PC Staff Report 03-04-2014PROPOSED MOTION:
"The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the minor
amendment to the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) to increase
the maximum building square footage within the development; and the Site Plan Review to
construct a 39,240 square -foot office /warehouse building subject to the conditions of the staff
report and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation."
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting a Rezoning for a minor amendment
to the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) to increase the
maximum building square footage within the development; and Site Plan Review to construct a
39,240 square -foot office /warehouse building for Business Impact Group on property zoned
Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located on part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen
West Business Park (2410 Galpin Court).
LOCATION: 2410 Galpin Court (PID- 25- 2240011)
APPLICANT: Taunton Ventures LP
2411 Galpin Court Suite 120
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952) 278 -7822
ptaunton(n,impactgroW.us
PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD)
2020 LAND USE PLAN:
ACREAGE: 2.07 acres
Office Industrial
DENSITY: F.A.R. 0.44
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING:
The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs, and
amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy - making capacity. A
rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the
proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the
City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi - judicial decision.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 2 of 15
PROPOSAL /SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting a Rezoning for a minor amendment
to the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit
Development (PUD) to increase the maximum building square
footage within the development; and Site Plan Review to
construct a 39,240 square -foot office /warehouse building for
Business Impact Group on property zoned Planned Unit
Development (PUD) and located on part of Lots 1 and 2, Block
1, Chanhassen West Business Park (2410 Galpin Court).
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments
Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review
Chapter 20, Article VIII, Planned Unit Development District
Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office -
Institutional Developments
Chanhassen West Business Park PUD Development Design Standards
BACKGROUND
On July 28, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following:
An amendment to the Planned Unit Development design standards for Chanhassen West
Business Park to permit a total development building square footage of 365,000.
The Site Plan for Planning Case #08 -14, for a 30,500 square -foot, one -story office /warehouse
building on Lot 3, Block 2, Chanhassen West Business Park (CWIII).
On February 11, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved the site plan for a 50,000 square -
foot, one -story office warehouse building on Lot 1, Block 2, Chanhassen West Business Park
(BIG /Snap).
On April 10, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following:
The Chanhassen West Business Park PUD Amendment for a 20 -foot parking setback from
Lyman Boulevard right -of -way for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Chanhassen West Business Park.
Site Plan #06 -11 for a 49,105 square -foot office /warehouse building on Lot 2, Block 2,
Chanhassen West Business Park.
On September 29, 2005 the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for Chanhassen
West Business Park creating 8 lots, 3 outlots and associated right -of -way for public streets.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 3 of 15
On August 22, 2005, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following:
Rezoning of the property located within the Chanhassen West Business Park from
Agricultural Estate District (A -2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD);
Preliminary Plat for Chanhassen West Business Park, plans prepared by Schoell & Madson,
Inc., dated June 17, 2005; and
Wetland Alteration Permit to fill and alter wetlands within the development, plans prepared by
Schoell & Madson, Inc., dated June 17, 2005.
PUD AMENDMENT
The applicant is requesting an amendment to the development design standards to increase the
overall development building area 12,000 square feet from 365,000 square feet to 377,000 square
feet. Since the proposed change in total square footage is less than five percent of the permitted
building area, the proposed amendment is considered a minor amendment pursuant to section 20-
507 (c) (3) of the Chanhassen City Code.
As can been seen by the building square footages compliance table below, previously the
majority of the difference between the originally approved development standard and the
proposed change occurred with the approval of the Waytek building. The additional building
square footage was used in the creation of a mezzanine level, which provides additional storage
area for the building. With this building approval, a second story of office space lead to the
increase in the overall square footage.
PUD Bldg.
Lot
Lot Area
Building area
area Estimate
Site coverage
Site
Coverage
(acres)
(sq. ft.)
F.A.R. 0.28
(acres)
s . ft.
( "%o)
Lot 3+ pt 1 & 2,
B 1 ( Waytek
7.98
110,000
97,300
5.1
64
Pt Lot 1 & 2,
B1
2.07
39,240
25,300
1.57
76
Lot 1, B 2
(BIG /Sna
3.8
50,000
46,500
2.66
70
Lot 2, B2
(Building 2)
3.32
49,105
40,300
2.65
80
Lot 3, B2 (CW
IIl)
2.85
30,500
34,800
1.96
68
Lot 4, B2
(Minger)
5.0
49,700
61,400
3.1
62
Lot 5, B2
(Outset)
3.58
48,000
43,700
2.5
70
Outlot C
3.8
0
0
0
0
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 4 of 15
The proposed amendment does not substantially change the trip generation of the development
(potentially increasing total daily trips by 153 trips, based on a Business Park classification, Trip
Generation 6`b Addition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997), nor raise the overall size of
the development above the threshold, 450,000 square feet, which would require the project to
perform a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Staff is recommending that the
PUD amendment be approved as outlined below in a strike - through/bold format.
In order to accommodate the increase in the square footage for this project, the PUD ordinance must
be amended as follows:
d. Development Standards Tabulation Box
1. Building Area
Building Square Footage Breakdown
Use
Percent Total
Square Feet
PUD Bldg.
30%
Site
Lot
Lot Area
Building area
area Estimate
Site coverage
Coverage
(acres)
(sq. ft.)
F.A.R. 0.28
(acres)
s . ft.)
Total
32.4
376,545
349,300
19.54
60
The proposed amendment does not substantially change the trip generation of the development
(potentially increasing total daily trips by 153 trips, based on a Business Park classification, Trip
Generation 6`b Addition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997), nor raise the overall size of
the development above the threshold, 450,000 square feet, which would require the project to
perform a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Staff is recommending that the
PUD amendment be approved as outlined below in a strike - through/bold format.
In order to accommodate the increase in the square footage for this project, the PUD ordinance must
be amended as follows:
d. Development Standards Tabulation Box
1. Building Area
Building Square Footage Breakdown
Use
Percent Total
Square Feet
Office
30%
47 115,500
Light Industrial/Warehouse
70%
X3399 261,500
Total (Maximum)
363;000 377,000
The actual use percentages and square footage totals may vary provided that the total building
square footages are not exceeded.
2. More than one (1) principal structure may be placed on one (1) platted lot.
3. Building height shall be limited to 3 stories or 40 feet, except for Lot 5, Block 2 (lot 5) and Lot
3, Block 1 (lot 6) which shall have a building height limit of 2 stories and 30 feet, including
parapet.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 5 of 15
GENERAL SITE PLAN /ARCHITECTURE
The applicant is requesting site plan approval for a 39,240 square -foot, two -story
office /warehouse building on the 2.07 -acre site. Access to the site will be via two driveways to
the property from Galpin Court.
PWO DBUIIDUIG �I
1
�1 '1
1 5 m
e
e
1
\ \ I
Size Portion Placement
The building has one business entrance on the southeast corner of the building. The entrance is
emphasized through the use of projecting columns and the extension of the stone veneer to the
roof. Additionally, copper colored, arched metal canopies are located over the entrance.
Building articulation is accomplished though the use of multiple materials, use of windows and a
canopied entrance, providing stone veneer columns and wainscot on street frontages and the
stepping back of the building along the southern elevation.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 6 of 15
Material and detail
Building materials consist of tilt up exposed aggregate panels, stone veneer wainscot and
columns, burnished sill block window headers and sills, aluminum window and door frames,
metal canopies and metal columns and wall coping.
Color
The primary building color is dark brown with brown entry columns and wall caps, and amber
bronze window and door frames. Window headers and sills are limestone colored. The canopies
as well as metal accent bands in columns are copper colored. The stone veneer along the bases
and in the columns and at the entries mix tan bronze and red.
Height and Roof Design
Building height is 35 feet to the top of the parapet, except in columns areas where the height is
36 feet. Pitched roof elements consist of the arched canopy over the entry. Mechanical
equipment shall be screened through the use of low - profile units and placement away from the
edges of the roof.
Facade Transparency
The building includes transparent windows and or doors in all office areas of the building.
Additionally, upper level windows are proposed throughout the building. All other areas shall
include landscaping material and architectural detailing and articulation.
For buildings with a use or function that does not readily allow windows, e.g storage areas or
warehouse, the fenestration standards may be reduced. However, the architecture detailing must
be provided by the use of upper level windows, the use of spandrel glass or architectural
detailing which provides arches, patterning, recesses and shadowing that provide aesthetic
interest. The applicant has provided the stone veneer columns at all the upper level warehouse
windows. The stone veneer wainscot is continued from the east side of the building along the
south side of the building, providing additional architectural detailing to the warehouse area of
the building.
Site Furnishing
The developer will be required to provide a pedestrian connection to the city trail on Galpin
Boulevard. Pedestrian ramps shall be installed at all curbs along this pathway. The developer
should provide benches and/or picnic tables for employees.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 7 of 15
Loading Areas, Refuse Area, etc.
Loading docks are located to the west of the building. Trash containers are proposed to be
located within the building.
Signage
The applicant shows a wall sign over the primary entrance. This sign has not been evaluated for
compliance with city code. A separate sign permit will be required prior to its installation.
The signage shall follow the Chanhassen West Business Park PUD. There shall be one project
identification sign permitted at the entrance on Galpin Boulevard. The sign shall not exceed eight
feet in height. A maximum of 80 square feet of sign area shall be permitted. The project
identification sign shall not be counted against the permitted signage on an individual parcel.
1. All freestanding parcel signs shall be limited to monument signs. The sign shall not exceed
eighty (80) square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight (8) feet in height.
2. Each property shall be allowed one monument sign per street frontage.
3. The signage will have consistency throughout the development. A common theme will be
introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. The sign
treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the
development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material throughout the
development.
4. Wall sign shall be permitted per city ordinance for industrial office park site.
5. All signs shall require a separate sign permit.
Lighting
The applicant shows five 20 -feet tall and one 15 -foot tall parking lot light along the south side of
the parking lot area. Additionally, two wall- mounted wall units are included over the loading
docks. The lighting fixtures are all downcast and shielded from off -site illumination. City Code
permits a maximum pole height of 30 feet.
Landscaping
Minimum requirements for landscaping at the proposed development include 2,566 square feet
of landscaped area around the parking lot, landscape islands or peninsulas, 10 trees for the
parking lot. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and
parking lot trees is shown in the following table.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 8of15
Applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot area.
Bufferyards are required along Galpin Boulevard and the north property line. The north property
is installed at 75% of the total required, as directed by ordinance.
Bufferyard requirements:
Required
Proposed
Vehicular use landscape
area
2,566 sq. ft.
>2,566 sq. ft.
Trees/ parking lot
10 trees
10 trees
Islands or
peninsulas/ parking lot
5 islands /peninsulas
6 islands /peninsulas
Applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot area.
Bufferyards are required along Galpin Boulevard and the north property line. The north property
is installed at 75% of the total required, as directed by ordinance.
Bufferyard requirements:
All bufferyard requirements have been met.
WETLANDS AND SHORELAND AREAS
The site to be developed does not have wetlands on or immediately adjacent. Further, the site
does not lie within a shoreland overlay district.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
The existing site directs water on the north portion of the site to the property to the north. The
center of the site collects water at an on -site catch basin for entry into the stormwater system.
The western and eastern parts of the site drain onto Galpin Court.
The proposed design grading will direct rainwater that falls north and east of the proposed
building toward the property to the north. The majority of parking lot stormwater runoff is
directed into rain gardens before entering the stormwater system.
Required plantings
Proposed plantings
Bufferyard B — north
3 overstory trees
3 Overstory trees
prop. line, 420'
6 Understory trees
6 Understory trees
6 Shrubs
6 Shrubs
Bufferyard C — east prop.
3 Overstory trees
6 Overstory trees
line, 100'
6 Understory trees
8 Understory trees
9 Shrubs
15 Shrubs
All bufferyard requirements have been met.
WETLANDS AND SHORELAND AREAS
The site to be developed does not have wetlands on or immediately adjacent. Further, the site
does not lie within a shoreland overlay district.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
The existing site directs water on the north portion of the site to the property to the north. The
center of the site collects water at an on -site catch basin for entry into the stormwater system.
The western and eastern parts of the site drain onto Galpin Court.
The proposed design grading will direct rainwater that falls north and east of the proposed
building toward the property to the north. The majority of parking lot stormwater runoff is
directed into rain gardens before entering the stormwater system.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 9 of 15
EN
V� AA
-- _ L \a \O`IUh
/ *a _ 111 Q11 Il,
- -- -- -- — — — — -- — ,11111,111 A
/ - - - - -- -- - -- Lnplle
\\ / PPOPMEDBOIMING
V AV RM,
\ _� t-
-_ - -_
w,
_ 77'
,
The developer must submit a soils report to the City.
The engineer shall revise the proposed grading plan to show the existing and proposed elevation
at the corners of the proposed building.
The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas.
Drainage and Treatment
The submittal did not include an exhibit showing pre- and post - development drainage for the
site. This is required as part of the submittal packet as well as under the National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System Permit to Discharge Storm Water Associated with Construction
Activities. Further, there was no hydrologic or hydraulic calculation summaries provided. The
applicant must demonstrate that rates are not increasing off the site and that the proposed
infrastructure can accommodate the newly generated runoff characteristics.
The applicant is proposing two bioretention features on the property. These shall be designed
and constructed per guidelines listed in the on -line version of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual
which can be found here:
http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title—Main Page &oldid =12872
No details were provided for these features. These details are required and shall include the
following information:
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 10 of 15
• Any soil amendments and corrections.
• Pre - treatment practices to be employed and these shall be shown on the plan view and in
the detail sheet. It is highly recommended that something similar to the Rain Guardian
developed by Anoka Conservation District be used.
• Steps that will be taken to prevent compaction and siltation of the area resulting from
construction activities on the site.
• Calculations demonstrating that the features will draw down in 48 hours or less.
• Calculations demonstrating the features will provide treat 1 -inch water quality volume
from impervious areas.
The site lies within the boundaries of the Carver County Watershed Management Organization.
The applicant will need to comply with their requirements for stormwater management.
Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control
The lot of record is over two acres in size and the majority of the lot is to be graded and
developed with some impervious coverage. The minimum threshold for requiring a NPDES
Construction Permit is the disturbance of one acre or more. It is clear that this threshold will be
surpassed. As a result, an NPDES permit will be required and a standalone Surface Water
Pollution Prevention Plan must be developed. The SWPPP must be reviewed and approved prior
to any earth - disturbing activities associated with the project. Proof of permit will also be
required to be on site prior to any earth - disturbing activities.
The SWPPP must include all elements required by the permit. At a minimum, the following
items were not found within the plan sheets provided for review.
• A narrative of construction activity per Part IIIA 1.
• A listing of the chain of responsibility for oversight of SWPPP implementation per Part
IIIA 2.
• Training documentation for those involved in the design and implementation of the
SWPPP per Part IIIE.
• Designs and calculations for meeting Stormwater Discharge Requirements although it is
understood that this project was originally permitted under different rules so design
requirements will be to that approval as administered by Carver County WMO.
• Estimated preliminary quantities tabulation for all erosion prevention and sediment
control BMPs per Part IIIA 5.
• Impervious coverage pre - development and post - development per Part IIIA 5.
• Site map showing soil types per Part IIIA 5.
• A map of surface waters and wetlands within one -mile of site which will receive
stormwater. The SWPPP must identify if these are special or impaired waters. Lake
Hazeltine receives runoff from the site and is listed as a 303D impaired water.
• The SWPPP must indicate who is responsible for the maintenance of the permanent
stormwater management practices on the site and a maintenance plan to assure
performance of the practice as listed in Part IIIA 5 k.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 11 of 15
• The plans must show all elements required underpart IV.0 of the permit.
The following items shall be incorporated into plan sheets C5.01A, C5.02A and C5.03A as
applicable.
• The existing Storm Catch Basin identified as ST CB on sheet C5.01A shall either be
abandoned and have the conveyance eliminated or shall have inlet protection provided
prior to disturbance within the area tributary to the CB. This shall be shown on the plan
sheet and included within the Sequence of Construction.
• Because the site connects to city infrastructure, the City and/or their representatives shall
be represented at the pre - construction meeting and shall approve the installation of
BMPs. The Sequence of Construction shall be changed to reflect this.
• Biolfiltration areas cannot be brought on -line until all tributary areas are stabilized. The
Sequence of Construction shall reflect this.
• Inlet protection shall be called out at all curb cut areas and the practice shall be included
in the details. The Sequence of Construction shall reflect this need.
• The swale areas must be stabilized with ditch checks, erosion control blanket or other
approved best management practice.
• The Sequence of Construction found on Sheet C5.02 A shall have "if required by
contract" removed.
• On sheet C5.03A, the city does not allow for the use of wooden posts for silt fence. The
silt fence detail must be modified to reflect this.
• On sheet C5.03A, change Maintenance Note 7 to include compaction and sediment
protection from all construction related activities.
CONNECTION CHARGES
Surface Water Management connection charges were collected when the parcel was platted. No
charges are due with the site plan review.
RETAINING WALL
Two retaining walls are proposed near the loading area. They are proposed to be boulder -style
retaining walls.
The wall located at the southwest corner of the building is 15 feet long and has a maximum
height of two feet.
The longer wall on the west side of the building is 46 feet long and has a maximum height of two
feet.
The plan shall be revised to show the top and bottom wall elevations.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 12 of 15
PARKING LOT
The parking lot meets the Chanhassen City Code requirements of 9 -foot by 18 -foot minimum
stall dimensions, as well as the 26 -foot wide driving aisles for 90 degree parking spaces.
The engineer shall show the truck turning movements in the loading area on the plan.
The plan must follow all applicable State and Federal guidelines, including ADA standards for
the sidewalk reconstruction.
SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
Sanitary sewer and water main to be installed for this project shall be privately owned and
maintained.
COMPLIANCE TABLE
PUD BIG Building (39,240 sq. ft.)
Building Height 3 stories 2 story
40 feet 35 feet
Building Setback N - 10' E - 50' N - 10'E -52'
W- 30'S -30' W- 58'S -58'
Parking Stalls 52 stalls 52 stalls
(6,000 square feet of Office at 511,000 sq. ft. equals 30 stalls. 33,240 square feet of Warehouse
at 1 /1,000 for first 10,000, then 1/ 2,000 thereafter equals 22 stalls.)
Parking Setback
Hard Surface Coverage
Lot Area
N- 0'E -50'
W- 10,S -10'
70%
1 acre
N- 0'E -50'
W- 10,S -10'
76 %#
2.07 acres
# Hard surface coverage must average 70 percent over the entire development. Individual lots
may exceed 70 percent site coverage.
PARK DEDICATION FEE
A portion of the park dedication fee for this property was collected with the development
contract. The remaining balance of this fee is $23,121.00 and must be paid with the building
permit. The developer shall install a pedestrian access to Galpin Blvd Trail.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 13 of 15
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Planned Unit Development
amendment and site plan review subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached
Findings of Fact and Recommendation:
1. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City.
2. The developer shall pay the park fee of $23,121.00 with the building permit.
3. The developer shall install a pedestrian access to the Galpin Boulevard trail.
4. The developer shall provide benches and/or picnic tables for employees.
5. The developer shall provide detail of the bioretention areas is provided showing:
a. Any soil amendments and corrections,
b. Pre - treatment practices to be employed and these shall be shown on the plan view and in
the detail sheet (It is highly recommended that something similar to the Rain Guardian
developed by Anoka Conservation District be used.), and
c. Steps that will be taken to prevent compaction and siltation of the area resulting from
construction activities on the site.
6. Hydrologic calculations demonstrating that the features will draw down in 48 hours or less
are provided.
7. Hydrologic and water quality calculations demonstrating the features will treat 1 -inch water
quality volume from impervious areas is provided.
8. An exhibit showing pre- and post - development drainage is provided.
9. Calculations shall be provided demonstrating that no increase in runoff rates will result at any
point leaving the site after build out.
10. The SWPPP shall be modified such that it is a standalone document which includes all
elements required by the permit. At a minimum this shall include the following elements:
a. A narrative of construction activity per Part IIIA 1.
b. A listing of the chain of responsibility for oversight of SWPPP implementation per Part
IIIA 2.
c. Training documentation for those involved in the design and implementation of the
SWPPP per Part IIIF.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 14 of 15
d. Designs and calculations for meeting Stormwater Discharge Requirements although it is
understood that this project was originally permitted under different rules so design
requirements will be to that approval as administered by Carver County WMO.
e. Estimated preliminary quantities tabulation for al erosion prevention and sediment
control BMPs per Part IIIA 5.
f. Impervious coverage pre - development and post - development per Part IIIA 5.
g. Site map showing soil types per Part IIIA 5.
h. A map of surface waters and wetlands within one -mile of site which will receive
stormwater. The SWPPP must identify if these are special or impaired waters. Lake
Hazeltine receives runoff from the site and is listed as a 303D impaired water.
i. The SWPPP must indicate who is responsible for the maintenance of the permanent
stormwater management practices on the site and a maintenance plan to assure
performance of the practice as listed in Part IIIA 5 k.
j. The plans must show all elements required under part IV.0 of the permit.
11. The existing Storm Catch Basin identified as ST CB on sheet CS.OlA shall either be
abandoned and have the conveyance eliminated or shall have inlet protection provided prior
to disturbance within the area tributary to the CB. This shall be shown on the plan sheet and
included within the Sequence of Construction.
12. The bioretention area must be designed and constructed following the guidelines set forth in
the on -line Minnesota Stormwater Manual.
13. Because the site connects to city infrastructure, the City and/or their representatives shall be
represented at the pre - construction meeting and shall approve the installation of BMPs. The
Sequence of Construction shall be changed to reflect this.
14. Bioretention areas cannot be brought on -line until all tributary areas are stabilized. The
Sequence of Construction shall reflect this.
15. Inlet protection shall be called out at all curb cut areas and the practice shall be included in
the details. The Sequence of Construction shall reflect this need.
16. The swale areas must be stabilized with ditch checks, erosion control blanket or other
approved best management practice.
17. Silt fence or other acceptable perimeter control practices shall be extended to protect all
down gradient areas including the entire frontage along Galpin Court and shall be shown on
both CS.OlA and C5.02A.
18. The Sequence of Construction found on Sheet C5.02 A shall have "if required by contract'
removed.
19. On sheet C5.03A, the city does not allow for the use of wooden posts for silt fence. The silt
fence detail must be modified to reflect this.
Planning Commission
Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07
March 4, 2014
Page 15 of 15
20. On sheet C5.03A, change Maintenance Note 7 to include compaction and sediment
protection from all construction related activities.
21. The plans must meet all requirements set forth by other agencies with authority over the site.
The applicant is responsible to procure all necessary approvals and permissions. This
includes, among others, the MN Pollution Control Agency and the Carver County
Watershed Management Organization.
22. The developer must submit a soils report to the City.
23. The engineer shall revise the proposed grading plan to show the existing and proposed
elevation at the corners of the proposed building.
24. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas.
25. The plan shall be revised to show the top and bottom wall elevations at points along the
wall.
26. The engineer shall show the truck turning movements in the loading area on the plan.
27. The plan must follow all applicable State and Federal guidelines, including ADA standards
for the sidewalk reconstruction.
28. Sanitary sewer and water main to be installed for this project shall be privately owned and
maintained.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
2. Development Review Application.
3. Reduced Copy Existing Conditions Plan.
4. Reduced Copy Site Plan.
5. Reduced Copy Grading Plan.
6. Reduced Copy Erosion Control Plan Phase II.
7. Reduced Copy Utility Plan.
8. Reduced Copy Site Landscape Plan.
9. Reduced Copy Site Landscape Details.
10. Reduced Copy Architectural Site Plan.
11. Reduced Copy Floor Plan.
12. Reduced Copy Exterior Elevation.
13. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List.
g1plan\2014 planning cases\2014 -07 business impact gmup\staff report.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND RECOMMENDATION
IN RE:
Application of Taunton Ventures LP
On March 4, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled
meeting to consider the application of Taunton Ventures LP for a Planned Unit Development
amendment for Chanhassen West Business Park to increase the overall development building
square footage from 365,000 square feet to 377,000 square feet; and site plan approval for a two -
story, 39,240 square -foot office warehouse building. The Planning Commission conducted a
public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed
notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak
and now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development, PUD.
2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office / hndustrial uses.
The legal description of the property is: part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen West
Business Park.
4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse
effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are:
a) The proposed amendment has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive
Plan, which is guided for Office Industrial Use.
b) The proposed amendment is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area.
This is an office buisiness park.
c) The proposed amendment conforms with all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance and the PUD Standards.
d) The proposed amendment will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is
proposed since this use is compatable with surrounding uses.
e) The proposed amendment can be accommodated with existing public services and will
not overburden the city's service capacity.
f) Traffic generation due to the proposed amendment is within capabilities of streets serving
the property.
5. Site Plan Review
a) The proposed project is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's
development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other
plans that may be adopted;
b) The proposed project is consistent with the Site Plan Review requirements of City Code;
c) The proposed project preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by
minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the
general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas;
d) The proposed project creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with
natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to
the development;
e) The proposed project creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site
features, with special attention to the following:
1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a
desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community;
2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping;
3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design
concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures
and uses; and
4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking
in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior
drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and
vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking.
f) The proposed project protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable
provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light
and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which
may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses.
2
6. The planning report #2014 -07 dated March 4, 2014, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is
incorporated herein.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit
Development amendment increasing the overall building square footage from 365,000 to 377,000
square feet and site plan review for a two - story, 39,240 square -foot, office /warehouse building,
Planning Case #2014 -07.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4th day of March, 2014.
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
Its Chairman
gAp1an\2014 planning cases\2014 -07 business impact grouptfindings of fact.doc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard
Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317
Phone: (952) 227 -1300 / Fax: (952) 227 -1110
CITY OF CNANHASSEN
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Date Filed: J\ 60 -Day Review Deadline: 4 I V 1 Planner: = Case #:. A(, 14—U]
❑
Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................
$600
❑
Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers .....
$100
❑
Conditional Use Permit
❑
Single - Family Residence . ...............................
$325
❑
All Others .......................... ...............................
$425
❑
Interim Use Permit
❑
In conjunction with Single - Family Residence..
$325
❑
All Others .......................... ...............................
$425
❑
Grading z 1,000 cubic yards ...........................
UBC
❑✓
Rezoning
❑
Planned Unit Development (PUD) ..................
$750
❑�
Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................
$100
❑
All Others .......................... ...............................
$500
❑
Sign
Plan Review .................... ...............................
$150
❑
Site Plan Review
❑
Administrative ....................... ...........................$100
❑
Commercial /Industrial Districts * ......................$500
Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building areagc-D
`Include number of existing employees:
and number of new employees:
❑
Residential Districts .......... ...............................
$500
Plus $5 per dwelling unit
ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES:
❑✓ Notification Sign ............................ $200
(City to install and remove)
❑✓ Property Owners' List within 500' . +�.. $3 per address
(City to generate —fee determined at pr ation meeting)
❑✓ Escrowfo� cording Documents. 6 erdocument
(CU II�P�di ACNARMAP /Metes & Bounds Subdivision)
❑ Subdivision
❑ Create 3 lots or less ............. ...........................$300
❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot
❑ Metes & Bounds .........................$300 + $50 per lot
❑ Consolidate Lots ................... ...........................$150
❑ Lot Line Adjustment .............. ...........................$150
❑ Final Plat * ............................. ...........................$250
`Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs.
Escrow will be required for other applications through the
development contract.
❑ Vacation of Easements /Right -of- way ................... $300
(Additional recording fees may apply)
❑ Variance ..... ............................... ...........................$200
❑ Wetland Alteration Permit
❑ Single - Family Residence ............................... $150
❑ All Others ........................ ............................... $275
❑ Zoning Appeal ....................... ............................... $100
❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500
NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently,
the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
(Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal
information that must accompany this application)
TOTAL FEES:
Received from: jctuln vt
Date Received: t 3 I Check Number:S 3
'10
Project Name: Business Impact Group Warehouse
Property Address or Location: Galpin Court, Chanhassen, MN 55317 X41 O
Parcel #: kG- ,>+,4 ocU t l Legal Description: P/c L�4 s I `N •
Total Acreage: -4, .c(L Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No
Present Zoning: Requested Zoning: No change
Present Land Use Designation: 0A- ce I Requested Land Use Designation: N" c,a-e—
Existing Use of Property: Vacant land
of Proposal:
❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached
SCANNED
rk
APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained
authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to
the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by
the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application
should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this
application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application.
further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to
any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: Contact:
Address: Phone:
City /State /Zip: Cell:
Email: Fax:
Signature: Date:
PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do,
authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those
conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of
the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may
be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the
study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: Paul Taunton Contact: Paul Taunton
Address: 2411 Galpin Court Suite 120 Phone: (952) 278 -7822
City /State /Zip: Chanhassen YN 55317 Cell: (612) 840 -5164
Email:
Fax:
Date:
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all
information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the
appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and
applicable procedural requirements.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A
written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable)
Name: -i-`CWZtCir+ Contact:__ rie r-%
Address:
3157 a+ Sncv, bcilj .Pgj Phone: oZIR -tia4 - 5 tJl I
City /State /Zip:1 _rni I ly , M IJ 5`3 -1-15
Email: ",, WaukU .vll.n 6d JG_hm. cam
Who should receive copies of staff reports?
Cell: G,Si- to31 -O�o6
Fax:
*Other Contact Information:
SCANNED
Property Owner
Via: k Email
[I Mailed Paper Copy Name: L .,�n nderS
❑
Applicant
Via: ❑ Email
❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address:
Engineer
Via: 'K Email
❑ Mailed Paper Copy City /State /Zip:
Other"
Via: ❑ Email
❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: Rv n P j M . US
SCANNED
nfra
1NA3BA:M 8.6111
ePb'�IH®2'bN!
p69e6.61Z W�iY
...mkmn
lnent
BUSINESS
IMPACT GROUP
Project
CHANHASSEN
WEST BUSINESS
PARK
Location
CHANHASSEN,
MN
CALPIF4 COURT
Certification
Summary
Revision History
wem�mil
Sheet Title
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
PLAN
Sheet No. Revision
C2.01 A
Project No. HOU19929
6Z661noH '- NV-!Wd
v TWO
UOISinay 'ON 7a34S
NVId 3115
all!11aa45
uom„N /141w9M °° a -lnay artw
A3ois!H uols
kewwnS
.mv�u� ro
uoRe»Hlao
mNW
'N3SSVHNVH:)
❑Oge3oj
Nand
SS3NISn9 ism
N3SSVHNVHJ
I3afwd
dnoa913VdWI
SS3NISn9
lualp
gLRNn�4ML
yy4y�Nrt
N N1tlON °
ll 3AIONIWMOUA30=
O
O
- ®
,
11 I
6u61nOH -- NPafmd
Uad 10`aab�
NVId 9NIOVa9
all!11aa4s
uo�N^M OISI a)j
Adols!H uolsmay
w AdewwnS
.�mnsno.. ono
ate, UORMU!ua7
nMNIOV
'N3SSVHNVH:)
NNVd
SS3NISnH ISM
N3SSVHNVH:)
Pa!Old
dno891:)VdWI
SS3NISnH
°p�
luag�
n
waxen mw
fwxo�NUawu
n..
ml wsewmamaf
e«u..
- ®�.
9N3931 °�
......... eMa... i...e.i S3lON ONI0Vtl9=
nn-
1nr
r �IIII
1111
?l
0 11 11\
s
a 1
r � r
�i
3 �\
- -_ - -' _ 9Nlalln9 a3$adatld � \ � /—•_�
h f �
1 �^
mmmO�
®_I ®IIII�IIO_�_ILIIim_�_0_0_m_
��_
•� ��
— LEGEND
} AAA li
t�
®_
J
_
CEFFOU-
..w
O
6�1 V
�� p
0F -9 0PA10
IPI
,
I
PROPOSED BUILDING
—
®
EFERE
C
-
xror�,:o,o,xm,�
®...
»
i
v•y
Ee SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
PMSE,L
` y
s. xxmnrw.u�xnoox..s..�M�
\
•
�
,
.._..
4
T
_. ..._ Iai
�K. -..
•.
:»
s. mnnn[srt[mnrnxxi
oxo,x�
oxxnu »wwr »umxFE»orurmxs
.
�u�a
�
1
,: g ».,,»<wma,oERaoro«x.:n.a
�5011 EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROLOPER.ION TIME 5[.E...
INEZ
mmmO�
®_I ®IIII�IIO_�_ILIIim_�_0_0_m_
®_
_
iN FEET
fra
I�'rtmm �M A�Itl
Client
BUSINESS
IMPACT GROUP
Project
CHANHASSEN
WEST BUSINESS
PARK
Location
CHANHASSEN,
MN aVgr
tFRUPIN
Certification
EUF-
Summary
o »..
Revision History
xo.on.n so°mlroi /P.erx »n
Sheet Title
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
- PHASE2
Sheet No. Revision
C5.02 A
Project No. HOU19929
szesinOH 'wNUalw.d
b 10'93
uolS!naH 'ON ID04S
NVId Alllll(1
all!113a45
�wrv+viimiw %sPa.w x
Aio1sIH uo,sinaH
w.
W AdewwnS nS
r�oNNOm
uoWMIJ03
NW
'N3SSVHNVH7
uopeaol
)lavd
SS3NIS(191S3M
N3SSVHNVH:)
1J3(old
d(lON'J iDVd W I
SS3NIS(I8
IL-
luay�
•iRY W60
uPP %%' &r09
ON9 mxw W W
WMwtiNwMw4rM
eaju
..9HLLSt7 mx�me
31n03Hm 3annna H3M3StlWHO1S�
sawuxoiunessuosunun=
1
1
-
-
_
.
u ..••
4ann
2 spry
news
wt nm
PROPOSED BUILDING
se�
+ \� e.+- A= • ?R;.�'�+••_ it R
Mwmv /SWV roa•pgWpNWSGrtvup[
fra
u�
am,n�p wow.
Client
BUSINESS
IMPACTGROUP
Project
CHANHASSEN
WEST BUSINESS
PARK
Location
CHANHASSEN,
MN
..PNra�A,
Certification
w =rv,n,
Summary
Revision Historyno'
uo.mce eta s� um /swap
Sheet Title
SITE LANDCAPE
PLAN
Sheet No. Revision
NORTH L1.01 A
y""
IN "^ Project NO. HOU19929
Samoa
®®
MEN
Mwmv /SWV roa•pgWpNWSGrtvup[
fra
u�
am,n�p wow.
Client
BUSINESS
IMPACTGROUP
Project
CHANHASSEN
WEST BUSINESS
PARK
Location
CHANHASSEN,
MN
..PNra�A,
Certification
w =rv,n,
Summary
Revision Historyno'
uo.mce eta s� um /swap
Sheet Title
SITE LANDCAPE
PLAN
Sheet No. Revision
NORTH L1.01 A
y""
IN "^ Project NO. HOU19929
VA11I 1ho \ alomw
1 ENTRANCE DETAIL
u.az
� "'0 WORTH
ENTRANCE DETAIL
w ��
ENTRANCE DETAIL r
NOUN Az �
3P1110 NORTH
/ z l ENTRANCE DETAIL
u.az
-- NORTH
I
Ly \ ENTRANCE DETAIL
uAz
scV[f -'d NOIITH
i
nfra
,sm 14o
N�Nw,
M4; = �mk
Client �tibm
BUSINESS
IMPACT GROUP
Project
CHANHASSEN
WEST BUSINESS
PARK
Location
CHANHASSEN,
MN
Certificattii\onnP F�W
Summary �~
Revision History
Sheet Title
SITE LANDCAPE
DETAILS
Sheet No. Revision
ProjeRNo. HOU19929
LANDSRPVEUGEND
I
Ly \ ENTRANCE DETAIL
uAz
scV[f -'d NOIITH
i
nfra
,sm 14o
N�Nw,
M4; = �mk
Client �tibm
BUSINESS
IMPACT GROUP
Project
CHANHASSEN
WEST BUSINESS
PARK
Location
CHANHASSEN,
MN
Certificattii\onnP F�W
Summary �~
Revision History
Sheet Title
SITE LANDCAPE
DETAILS
Sheet No. Revision
ProjeRNo. HOU19929
Proposed Office/ Warehouse
Chanhassen West Business
Park Addition
C,
90®0
TotalMerohandiseAgency
.m iamxLJfOO: m`""w am.
art � / ago m m[ /.wuFi - wmxxn
1 Overall Site Pion
�cc�ay. °'~ �mar.rmmm
PFIOFOeM
n graphic site plan
PERSPECTIVE VIEW from SOUTHEAST
r _
y ,,, M,NL.
FAMI
4
SWfTE PLAN
HOMMAN
ARCHITECTS
oR�`;e�Nne
.m,x.xn�,x• ®r�xneex
3410 Gelpin Cuurl
Chanlassen, MN 55317
Business
Impact Group
2411 Galpin Coen
Suite 120
Cherhassen, MN 55317
.eV, IP., le met.
uoim wxmuarzwm"'xexme
Te le
urmwsmeucrtaeFinaxvuvs
uamWxruwFaxm•ixaxury
MFx'OiaRrtmrtoo ii
9m PUNSUUMMAL 11014
9. PLSUOUNUUMIN9 1444
1111 U9
DOW
JOP 1355
DAR
DRAWN L1
519911 IS
Site Plan
A1.0
n, MAIN FLOOR PLAN
.2nd FLOOR PLAN
NOUWMAN
ARCHUCTS
2410 GNPI. Court
GNPPM249SS, MN 55317
FIRLEMER OR
Business
Impact Group
2411 GO111. COON
Suite 120
CM1 ENEFEE, MN 55317
o..SOT METRE,
MY FERESSERSTION N OFFERED
OF FORTEREETT"'4"',
n� IRESELEwxmu.OR
e MORE
THE. ..TO wooeE
OF, EITHER, E.Enswx
RFMMEFR� THE
Sm PLU1903MmN N0.11
B.PLSUSN.WlOSmBl18 T1411
BIOSa
PPSn
Mat 1345
MR
MAN IN
COCAM 00
Floor Plans
A2.0
Oo° Oo O O o0 O O O °oO Oo
00 0_ o0 0 � o 0 0 o
O
O �3 O �"
�
p
X07 o a
O O O
0 0
SOUTH ELEVATION
*SOUTH EAST VIEW
s NO /iY• RTH ELEVATION
v�e� —
�a�— R�i�1��wYlYaQ_ YYYYLQ
MQr aunt YY�aa YYYYYLY�we
®i I .0hat. 6YY�aQ�YaQ
Qf IaI QaQaQa�w /w /aY1Yhe
OfafnY aa��r�w��rw
Qj �aaY+.YYYYealYia
va =aafaaul%
PYwwYa Yaw saaww
� nsaaas�a�a.yea><Y
P�fQYaPRY�YiQ{anY �aQQ�QQNnQYIna
YYIY[alY1fYMYaQ
IY��YI �PnY fYlanQ
� YYaaaaw -aaYQ way
aw YQwtQravaar M... P�
Pw PQwuQnvaQYQQPnnora�
13.YanYwYaaalfessuaYY aQYY
� �ns�saawrt�arwa�Yaa YQ QiY�eaaY
a
6 r J
Iii' dP¢ai
�SO�UTH EAST VIEW
C/
HOUWMAN
ARCHITECTS
nwiivamnn
awnwiwxauM�aoaaa
,;eovma
a fiat Unit
CIMMann Me 55317
Business
Impact Group
3411 Galptn Chun
Suite 130
Chanhassen. Mn 55317
THEM 11 —an`fa
HE m
as
Mn PnwnMwce
. inun
. EET sh,a Wse JtIM
1
FALD 1Ea WR
" ��RN
Pm PUiNSaMRAt 1414
APLOOKWUMMS 2-11,13
a1a 3n
aasn
!Ma INS
on
Oman a
CMPMM PN
Exterior Elevations
A3.0
i
s NO /iY• RTH ELEVATION
v�e� —
�a�— R�i�1��wYlYaQ_ YYYYLQ
MQr aunt YY�aa YYYYYLY�we
®i I .0hat. 6YY�aQ�YaQ
Qf IaI QaQaQa�w /w /aY1Yhe
OfafnY aa��r�w��rw
Qj �aaY+.YYYYealYia
va =aafaaul%
PYwwYa Yaw saaww
� nsaaas�a�a.yea><Y
P�fQYaPRY�YiQ{anY �aQQ�QQNnQYIna
YYIY[alY1fYMYaQ
IY��YI �PnY fYlanQ
� YYaaaaw -aaYQ way
aw YQwtQravaar M... P�
Pw PQwuQnvaQYQQPnnora�
13.YanYwYaaalfessuaYY aQYY
� �ns�saawrt�arwa�Yaa YQ QiY�eaaY
a
6 r J
Iii' dP¢ai
�SO�UTH EAST VIEW
C/
HOUWMAN
ARCHITECTS
nwiivamnn
awnwiwxauM�aoaaa
,;eovma
a fiat Unit
CIMMann Me 55317
Business
Impact Group
3411 Galptn Chun
Suite 130
Chanhassen. Mn 55317
THEM 11 —an`fa
HE m
as
Mn PnwnMwce
. inun
. EET sh,a Wse JtIM
1
FALD 1Ea WR
" ��RN
Pm PUiNSaMRAt 1414
APLOOKWUMMS 2-11,13
a1a 3n
aasn
!Ma INS
on
Oman a
CMPMM PN
Exterior Elevations
A3.0
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
February 24, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen,
Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing for Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2024 -07 to the persons named on
attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner,
and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage
fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate
records.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
thi[Q� day of Ce 2014.
\ I
Notary
Notary Public- Minnesota
rn ,W W Expim jw 31,201
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date & Time:
Tuesday, March 4, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start
until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Location:
City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for Rezoning for a minor amendment to the
Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development
Proposal:
(PUD) to increase the maximum building square footage within
the development; and Site Plan Review to construct a 36,240
square -foot office /warehouse building for Business Impact
Group on property zoned Planned Unit Development PUD
Applicant:
Taunton Ventures, LP
Property
Part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen West Business Park
Location:
(2410 Galpin Court)
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
What Happens
public hearing through the following steps:
at the Meeting:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project.
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the City's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -07. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by
Questions &
email at bpenerous anci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at
Comments:
952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
staff report for this item will be available online on the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
Planning Commission meeting.
City Review Procedure:
• Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings,
Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City
ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is
invited to attend the meeting.
• Staff prepares a report on Me subject application that includes all pedinent information and a recommendation. These reports are
available by request. At the Fanning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation.
The item will be opened for vie public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the
public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify
wholly or partly the Fanning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority
vote of the City Counal except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialflnduslriel.
• Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard.
Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the
process should check with the Fanning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
• A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to
meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested personjs).
• Because the Fanning Commission holds the public heading, the any Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence
regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Counal. If you wish to have something to be included in the report,
lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification.
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date & Time:
Tuesday, March 4, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start
until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Locatilow
City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for Rezoning for a minor amendment to the
Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development
Proposal.
(PUD) to increase the maximum building square footage within
the development; and Site Plan Review to construct a 36,240
square -foot office/warehouse building for Business Impact
Group on property zoned Planned Unit Development PUD
Applicant:
Taunton Ventures, LP
Property
Part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen West Business Park
Location:
(2410 Galpin Court)
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
What Happens
public hearing through the following steps:
at the Meeting:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project .
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the City's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -07. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by
Questions &
email at bpenerous(o)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at
Comments:
952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
staff report for this item will be available online on the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
Planning Commission meeting.
City Review Procedure:
• Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings,
Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City
ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is
invited to attend the meeting.
• Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are
available by request. At the Fanning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation.
The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pad of the hearing process. The Commission will close the
public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify
wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority,
vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindustrial.
• Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard.
Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the
process should check with the Fanning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
• A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the cry. Often developers are encouraged to
meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested peisoms).
• Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence
regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. ff you wish to have something to be included in the report,
lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification.
CHAN WEST II LLP DANIEL J & PAMELA J CULHANE DANIEL N GRANT
8821 SUNSET TRL 2333 BOULDER RD 2357 STONE CREEK LN
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9137 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7413
JC INVESTMENTS OF CHASKA LLC
1405 WEST FARM RD
CHASKA, MN 55318 -9517
JOHN VOSKAMP
2375 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7403
RICHARD B & CHRYSAUNA A BUAN
2369 STONE CREEK LN W
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7413
TAUNTON VENTURES LP
9980 DEERBROOK DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8551
JOHN D & JODEE A MURPHY
2360 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7403
KELLY K MORLOCK
2325 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7401
RODDY Y & LAURIE L W ZIVKOVICH
2337 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7401
THOMAS V & BEVERLY L ANTILLEY
2361 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7403
JOHN F & LAURIE SULLIVAN
2346 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7403
MP DEVELOPMENT LLC
2218 LUKEWOOD DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8425
SUNNY DAY FITNESS PROPERTIES
L
4640 PALMER POINT RD
MINNETRISTA, MN 55331 -9176
TIMOTHY J WHIPPS
2374 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7403
TOM & SOMMANA MONTHISANE VOLK - MINGER PROPERTIES LLC WAYTEK INC
2381 STONE CREEK LN W 2218 LUKEWOOD DR 2440 GALPIN CT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7413 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8425 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4621