Loading...
Wetland Permit Application (2)January 29, 2014 RE: Southwest Reconnection Project CSAH 61 and Highway 101 Reconstruction SEH No. CARVR 119938 14.00 Ms. Melissa Jenny Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District Office 180 5th Street East, Suite 700 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1678 Dear Ms. Jenny: On behalf of Carver County, please find the enclosed application for the Southwest Reconnection Project, which proposes to reconstruct CSAH 61 and the Highway 101 crossing of the Minnesota River. The project is located primarily within the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, although the southern end is within the City of Shakopee and Scott County. Carver County Public Works is the project proposer, and is accepting the Highway 101 as a turn-back from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The project will impact 4.18 acres of wetland, and 0.68 acres of Public Waters associated with the relocation of Bluff Creek, and for placement of bridge piers into Rice Lake and Minnesota River floodplain. Total impacts for discharge and excavation into waters or wetland is 4.96 acres. The project proposes to bridge Highway 101, which will allow for the removal of the existing causeway, and the restoration of 9.82 acres of wetland on-site. Mitigation is proposed through the Board of Water and Soil Resources transportation bank, as the project is driven by safety and to meet state aid standards. A small amount of impact related to a pedestrian trail will be replaced through purchase of wetland credits from a private bank. Construction is proposed to start in the spring of 2014. This letter is a request for a Letter of Permission from the USACE, a Public Waters Works Permit from the MNDNR, and approval of replacement plan for the Wetland Conservation Act. Thanks for your review and support of this project, Rebecca Beduhn Staff Biologist drd Enclosure c: See list on back s:\ae\c\carvr\119938\environmental\wetlands\wetland permit application\seh submittal letter.docx Error! Reference source not found. January 29, 2014 Page 2 c: Lyndon Robjent, Carver County Kristin Larson, Carver County Terrence Jeffery, City of Chanhassen Katherine Heinz, MNDOT Sarma Straumanis, MNDOT Molly Kline, MNDOT Peter Leete, MNDOT Bruce Loney, City of Shakopee Mitch Rasmussen, Scott County John Gleason, MNDNR Melissa Doperalski, MNDNR Ken Powell, BSWR Lynda Peterson, BWSR Greg Graczyk, Carver Soil and Water Conservation District Len Kramer, Barr Engineering Linda Loomis, Naiad Consulting, LLC Wetland Permit Application Carver County Public Works Carver County, Minnesota SEH No. CARVR 119938 January 2014 Wetland Permit Application Southwest Reconnection Project: Highway 61/101 Flood Mitigation Carver and Scott Counties Cities of Chanhassen and Shakopee, Minnesota SEH No. CARVR 119938 January 2014 I hereby certify that this wetland permit application was prepared by me, and the procedures and field methods used constitute an official wetland delineation in accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Name: Rebecca Beduhn Certified Wetland Delineator-IT, No. 5109 Professional Soil Scientist-IT, No. 144868 Reviewed by: Certified Wetland Delineator, No. 1009 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, MN 55110-5196 651.490.2000 This Page Left Blank Intentionally SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page i Table of Contents Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects Minnesota WCA Application for Certificate of No Loss or Exemption Department of Natural Resources Water Permit Application Fees Form Certification Page Table of Contents Page 1.0 Summary ....................................................................................................................1  1.1.1 Project Description .................................................................................. 1  1.1.2 Purpose and Need Statement ................................................................. 1  1.1.3 Wetland Impacts...................................................................................... 1  1.1.4 Wetland Creation .................................................................................... 1  1.1.5 Wetland Mitigation – Roadway Safety Improvements ............................. 2  1.1.6 Wetland Mitigation – Trail Impacts .......................................................... 2  2.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................2  2.1 Contact Information ............................................................................................. 3  2.2 Project Location .................................................................................................. 3  3.0 Purpose and Need .....................................................................................................4  4.0 Project Description ....................................................................................................4  4.1 Highway 101 Bridge Replacement ...................................................................... 4  4.2 CSAH 61 Improvements ..................................................................................... 5  4.3 Bluff Creek Realignment ..................................................................................... 5  4.4 Pedestrian Trail ................................................................................................... 5  4.5 Storm Water Treatment ...................................................................................... 6  4.6 Project Costs ....................................................................................................... 6  4.7 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................. 6  4.7.1 Safety ...................................................................................................... 7  4.7.2 Flood Events ........................................................................................... 7  4.7.3 Construction Methods ............................................................................. 8  4.7.4 Mobility .................................................................................................... 9  5.0 Wetlands .....................................................................................................................9  5.1.1 Wetland Delineations .............................................................................. 9  5.2 Results .............................................................................................................. 10  5.2.1 Bluff Creek ............................................................................................ 10  5.2.2 Minnesota River Floodplain ................................................................... 11  6.0 Sequencing ..............................................................................................................11  6.1 Project Alternatives, Avoidance, and Minimization ........................................... 11  6.1.1 No-build Alternative ............................................................................... 11  6.1.2 CSAH 61 Alternative 1 – Design and Location Alternatives .................. 11  6.1.3 Highway 101 Alternative 2 – Design and Location Alternatives ............ 12  6.1.4 Alternative 3 – Preferred Alternative ..................................................... 12  6.1.5 Summary of avoidance and minimization .............................................. 13  Table of Contents (Continued) Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page ii 7.0 Wetland Impacts ......................................................................................................13  7.1 Bluff Creek Impacts ........................................................................................... 13  7.2 Pedestrian Trail Impacts ................................................................................... 14  7.1 Wetland Re-establishment ................................................................................ 14  8.0 Wetland Replacement Plan .....................................................................................14  8.1.1 BWSR Road Program ........................................................................... 15  8.1.2 Wetland Banking ................................................................................... 15  9.0 Permitting and Regulatory Jurisdiction ................................................................16  9.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers .......................................................................... 16  9.2 Wetland Conservation Act – City of Chanhassen ............................................. 16  9.3 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ................................................... 17  10.0 Supplemental Information ......................................................................................17  10.1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife and MNDNR Property .................................................... 17  10.2 State Threatened and Endangered Species ..................................................... 18  10.3 Storm Water Treatment .................................................................................... 18  10.4 Archeological Resources .................................................................................. 18  List of Figures Figure 1 – Site Location and Topographic Map  Figure 2 – Aerial Photograph (2012)  Figure 3 – MNDNR Public Waters Inventory  Figure 4 – National Wetlands Inventory  Figure 5 – Soil Survey for Carver and Scott Counties  Figure 6a- Wetland Delineation Results – North  Figure 6b- Wetland Delineation Results – South  List of Appendices Appendix A - Project Plan Sheets Appendix B - Wetland Delineation Report  Appendix C - TH 101 “Wye” Feasibility Study  Appendix D - Combined Wetland Application Forms  Appendix E - Wetland Banking Forms  s:\ae\c\carvr\119938\environmental\wetlands\wetland permit application\th 101 - csah 61 wetland permit application.docx January 2014 CARVR 119938 Page 1 Wetland Permit Application Southwest Reconnection Project: Highway 61/101 Flood Mitigation Prepared for Carver County Public Works 1.0 Summary 1.1.1 Project Description The proposed Southwest Reconnection Project, located in the cities of Chanhassen and Shakopee Minnesota, will construct a new 4,226-foot long four-lane bridge over the Minnesota River floodplain area and will include roadway safety and capacity improvements to Carver County State Aid Highway 61 (also known as Flying Cloud Drive) from approximately 475 feet west of Bluff Creek Drive to approximately 350 feet east of the Highway 61/101 “Wye” intersection. The total length of improvements along Highway 101 and Flying Cloud Drive is approximately 4,860 feet and 3,660- feet, respectively. 1.1.2 Purpose and Need Statement Highway 101 and CSAH 61 have safety and operational needs associated with the roadways having to close during periods of flooding, whereby requiring traffic to find alternative routes to cross the Minnesota River. There are also short- and long-term capacity deficiencies with the growing travel demand along these corridors. Both Highway 101 and CSAH 61 are currently experiencing peak hour traffic delays as the traffic volumes are approaching or exceeding the capacities of these two-lane roadways 1.1.3 Wetland Impacts The project will impacts a total of 4.96 acres of wetland. This consists of 0.21 acres for the new 101 crossing, and 3.76 acres of fill, 0.52 acres of excavation, and 0.47 acres for Bluff Creek realignment for the new round about and improvements to TH61. Of these impacts, 3,593 sf (0.08 acre) are uniquely associated with a pedestrian trail. Trail impacts are minimal, as they occur within the areas of proposed soils correction. 1.1.4 Wetland Creation Construction of the new bridge will allow for the removal of the existing causeway (fill material) from the Minnesota River 100-year floodplain area. The removal of the existing Highway 101 causeway across the Minnesota River floodplain area will have a positive effect by allowing restoration of natural wetland/floodplain habitat to re- Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 2 establish. Approximately 427,983 ft2 (9.82 acres) are anticipated to re-establish natural wetland/floodplain habitat through the removal of the exiting causeway. The removal of the causeway cannot be used as part of the replacement plan, as it will be part of the roadway right-of-way, and it is not feasible or prudent to place that area under the required conservation easements. The restoration of this area is a significant ecological improvement, and it is requested that it be considered in the overall decision making 1.1.5 Wetland Mitigation – Roadway Safety Improvements Wetland mitigation for this project is proposed through the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) as this project is a safety improvement. TH101 has been subject to frequent flooding and road closures. TH61 has had numerous accidents due to the placement if multiple intersections in close proximity, and traffic volumes that exceed the design requirements. Replacement of multiple intersections provides a safety improvement, and will secondarily achieve improved traffic movement. Wetland impacts associated with the roadway, bridge construction, storm water ponds, and relocation of Bluff Creek are 4.88 acres. It is proposed to utilize the BWSR roadway program, which would withdraw 9.76 acres to meet a 2:1 replacement ratio. 1.1.6 Wetland Mitigation – Trail Impacts The proposed pedestrian trail will impact 0.08 acre of wetland. The trail is not a safety improvement, and cannot utilize the BWSR roadway program. It is proposed to withdraw 0.16 acres of wetland credit from the German Settlement bank, which is within the same Bank Service Area, and therefore allows for replacement at a 2:1 ratio. 2.0 Introduction This wetland permit application has been prepared to describe the proposed construction of a new four-lane bridge spanning the Minnesota River floodplain area between the existing Trunk Highway 101 Minnesota River Bridge in Shakopee, Minnesota and County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 61/Flying Cloud Drive in Chanhassen, Minnesota. For safety improvements, the Hwy 101/ County Hwy 61 “wye” intersection will be reconstructed as a roundabout to accommodate the new Hwy 101 bridge. A pedestrian/bicycle trail will also be constructed along the north side of CSAH 61. The demonstration of wetland impact avoidance and minimization in this application follows the sequencing process of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) of 1991 and the federal Clean Water Act. These procedures require that projects that may result in the draining or filling of wetland habitat should demonstrate avoidance and minimization of such impacts. Wetland impacts that cannot be feasibly avoided or minimized must be replaced by compensatory mitigation. The proposed project will result in permanent impacts to wetland habitat for the construction of the interchange at the Hwy 101/ County Hwy 61 and the construction of the new four-lane bridge .This permit application is requesting: 1. Letter of Permission under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, as administered by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 3 2. Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, as administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) – Waived for LOP projects. 3. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) Public Waters Works Permit 4. Approval of a wetland replacement plan under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) An Environmental Assessment was completed, and was administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHA). A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was issued by the FHA in September 2013. The following information will discuss the project purpose and need, sequencing, impacts, and proposed mitigation for the permanent and temporary loss of wetland functions and values. 2.1 Contact Information The following is a summary of the contacts for this project. Table 1: Summary of Project Proposer, Agent, and Contact Information Proposer: Carver County Agent Short Elliott  Hendrickson  Contact  Person Lyndon Robjent, P.E. Contact  Person Rebecca Beduhn  Title Public Works Director/  County Engineer Title Wetland Biologist  Address 11360 Highway 212, Suite 1 Address 3535 Vadnais Center  Dr.  City, state,  ZIP Cologne, MN 55322 City, state,  ZIP St. Paul, MN 55110  Phone (952) 466‐5200  Phone 651‐490‐2146  Fax (952) 466‐5223 Fax 651‐490‐2150  E‐mail lrobjent@co.carver.mn.us E‐mail rbeduhn@sehinc.com  2.2 Project Location The project site is located in the eastern ½ of Section 35 and the western ½ of Section 36 in Township 116 North, Range 23 West in Cities of Chanhassen and Shakopee, Carver County, MN; and the northern ½ of Section 1 in Township 115 North, Range 23 West in Shakopee, Scott County, MN as shown on Figure 1, and summarized in Table 2. The area of investigation is approximately a 1 mile along TH 101 at the intersections of TH101 and CSAH 61. The project area is detailed in Figure 2, and summarized below. Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 4 Table 2: Summary of Project Location County City Township Range Sections  Carver County  Scott County  City of Chanhassen  City of Shakopee  T116N  T115N  R23W  R23W  35 and 36  1  The current land use adjacent to the project is a mix of open space (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Raguet Wildlife Management Area, low density residential, light industrial and commercial developments. 3.0 Purpose and Need The purpose of the project is to ensure Highway 101 and CSAH 61 remain open to traffic during 100-year flood events, while also ensuring the transportation improvements do not cause an increase in the 100-year floodplain elevation. The project purpose also includes improving safety and mobility throughout the project area by reducing intersections and adding capacity to both Highway 101 and CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive). 4.0 Project Description 4.1 Highway 101 Bridge Replacement The new bridge across the Minnesota River floodplain area, particularly over Public Waters 10-221W and 27-132P (Rice Lake), is proposed to be constructed immediately southwest of the existing roadway, which is built upon an elevated causeway. The bridge will be approximately 4,226-feet long and 78.5-feet wide, and be composed of 41 bridge sections, spaced every 105 feet. Forty piers and two abutments will be needed to support the bridge sections. Thirty seven of these will be within all or partially within wetland, and will consist of between 8and 11 bent piles with a concrete cap to support the bridge sections. Some of the bent pile are within upland at the bridge ends, or contain some bent pile within the existing causeway. In total, there are 374 bent piles proposed to be within wetland, and each has been estimated to have 25 square feet of wetland impact. The new four-lane bridge will accommodate two 12-foot driving lanes in each direction with 8-foot outside shoulders. The new bridge will elevate the roadway approximately 3 feet to 22 feet above the existing roadway, which will raise the roadway above of the 100-year flood elevation and consequently minimize road closures from flooding without increasing the 100-year flood elevation. It is anticipated that pile driving and pier placement construction would begin during summer of 2014. Construction of the new bridge will allow for the removal of the existing causeway (fill material) from the Minnesota River 100-year floodplain area. The causeway will be removed to the elevation of approximately 700 feet above mean sea level (1929 NGVD), approximately 11-14 feet below the elevation of the existing roadway surface. This will reduce the frequency and duration of roadway closures and restore natural flows to the river under high water/flood conditions. Upon removal, some of the old Highway 101 roadway material may be placed on a commercial property (Golf Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 5 Zone driving range) located along CSAH 61, but outside of wetland. Any material removed off site will also be disposed of in an upland location. 4.2 CSAH 61 Improvements Roadway and intersection safety improvements are proposed along Carver CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive). The CSAH 61/Flying Cloud Drive roadway improvements include adding a four-lane roadway section between the Highway 101 “Wye” intersection on the east and Bluff Creek Road on the west. Two new roundabout intersections are proposed at the Highway 101 “Wye” and Bluff Creek Drive intersections, which will replace the current lighted intersections. The roundabouts contain dedicated lanes for traffic that os passing through, and that is turning, to reduce the amount of shared time with vehicles within the roundabout. The CSAH 61/Flying Cloud Drive improvements will maintain a traffic signal at the Highway 101 (American Boulevard)/Flying Cloud Drive intersection. Muck soils are abundant in the project area, and soils corrections are required. These corrections have expanded the project limits beyond what would be required for construction in more stable soil types. 4.3 Bluff Creek Realignment Bluff Creek currently passes under CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) and Highway 101 via twin box culverts. The proposed project includes replacement of the twin box culverts under CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) and removal of four culverts under Highway 101. These will be replaced with new bridge on CSAH 61, and by spanning Bluff Creek with a bridge under Highway 101. In order to accommodate the new roundabout, and align the creek to by crossed with the new 101 bridge, the creek channel is proposed to be modified. He total length of Bluff Creek is proposed to be extended from the current length of 421 linear feet between the box culverts on CSAH 61 to the culverts under Highway 101, to a new channel length of 529 linear feet. The realigned section of Bluff Creek will benefit from replacing culverts with bridges, will be longer in total length, and will have more meanders than it currently does. 4.4 Pedestrian Trail The project also features pedestrian/bicycle trail improvements including a 10-foot off-road trail located on the southwest side of the proposed river/floodplain bridge. The trail corridor is proposed to cross under CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) in a shared bridge crossing with Bluff Creek. In addition, an 8-foot off-road trail will extend east along the north side of CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) to the eastern project termini, which will connect to a future trail corridor in Hennepin County. The proposed off-road trail will also extend west to Bluff Creek Drive where the trail will run along the shoulder of Bluff Creek Drive until it connects with the Minnesota River Valley LRT Trail, located approximately 0.25 miles north of CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive). The trail will result in some wetland impacts on the north side of the 61/101 roundabout. Total impacts unique to the trail are 3,593 square feet. This is a small number because the majority of the trail is located within areas that have had soils correction for the roadway, and are already quantified within the roadway impacts. Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 6 The bridge crossing on CSAH 61 over bluff Creek will accommodate the trail and have no additional impacts. 4.5 Storm Water Treatment Four drainage and water quality features are proposed within the project area to collect, convey, and/or treat surface water runoff. These features include drainage ditches, grass swales, infiltration ponds, and wet detention ponds. These features are being designed to meet local and state water quality standards. The west pond has been placed primarily within an area of upland, but will require excavation of wetland in order to get the required amount of treatment. The northeast pond, which is associated with the roundabout, has the greatest wetland impact, but is also providing the majority of treatment, and is utilizing the existing park and ride lot to reduce wetland impacts. The remaining storm water features (bridge pond and south pond) are placed entirely within upland, and will have no impacts. 4.6 Project Costs Estimated Total Project Cost - $60,300,000 (includes construction, right-of-way, and engineering). No federal funds are proposed for use on this project. Project Funding MnDOT Flood Mitigation Program: $20,000,000 Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP): $9,000,000 MnDOT Construction Engineering $8,200,000 County Turnback Funds: $12,400,000 Carver County: $7,500,000 Scott County: $2,300,000 City of Chanhassen: $900,000 TOTAL $60,300,000 4.7 Existing Conditions Currently, TH 101 is a 2-lane undivided highway over the Minnesota River and up to CSAH 18 (Lyman Boulevard). The south end of TH 101 over the river ends at the intersection of Scott CR 69/CR 101. The north side of the river crossing ends at Flying Cloud Drive through a “wye” intersection, which diverts traffic into eastbound and westbound directions through two controlled intersections. The designated TH 101 jogs westerly on Flying Cloud before TH 101 continues up the bluff into Chanhassen. CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) is a 2-lane undivided roadway in the study area with turn lanes at four signalized intersections. The existing road runs westerly from the project area through downtown Chaska and easterly through Eden Prairie before ending at US 212. The current configuration of the interchange with CSAH 61 and Highway 101 is divided into a “wye”, which diverts east and west bound traffic to two intersections. This increases the opportunities for accidents, and poorly manages the existing levels of traffic volumes on these roadways. Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 7 4.7.1 Safety Currently, the project area contains six (6) separate intersections. The signaled intersection at 101 and 61, where 101 turns north into Chanhassen as Great Plaines Blvd, will be reconstructed to have two thru lanes and dedicated turn lanes. The two intersections with east and west bound CSAH 61 and Highway 101 will be replaced by a single roundabout. The unsignaled intersection of Bluff Creek Dr. and Flying Cloud Dr. will be replaced with a single-land roundabout. Roundabouts were selected for the intersection because roundabouts are safer than traffic signals and stop signs for both motor vehicles and pedestrians. Crash data from January 1st, 2009 through December 31st, 2012 were obtained from MnDOT’s Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT). A total of 38 crashes occurred in this time frame, none of which were fatal. According to MnDOT, installation of a roundabout will reduce crashes by approximately a 39 percent. This is due to slower speeds, and the angle of collision impact. 4.7.2 Flood Events The Highway 101 Minnesota River crossing serves as an important component of the state and regional transportation system by providing an essential traffic link across the river for three counties; Carver, Hennepin and Scott Counties, as well as the surrounding cities. The Highway 101 Minnesota River crossing is located below the 100-year flood elevation of the river. Typically when there is flooding in the Minnesota River Valley both Highway 101 and nearby TH 41 are forced to close. The remaining open river crossings are US Highway 169 and TH 25, located nearly 25 miles apart. During these seasonal flood events, the detoured traffic adds a tremendous strain on the area’s regional transportation system when Highway 101 and TH 41 river crossings are closed. Three major flooding events between the spring of 2010 and the spring of 2011 closed both the Highway 101 and Highway 41 river crossings for several weeks, which prompted MnDOT to complete the Minnesota River Flood Mitigation Study in September 2011. The Minnesota River Flood Mitigation Study calculated the daily combined cost of both highway closures by applying the value of additional time and miles traveled using the Metropolitan Council’s 2030 Regional Travel Demand Model. The resulting cost was $670,000 per day in the year 2009, and is forecasted to be $1,670,000 per day in year 2030. Using the study results, MnDOT was successful in securing Flood Mitigation funding for the Highway 101 crossing of the Minnesota River floodplain area. Table 3: Days Highway 101 Crossing Was Closed During Flood Events (1965-2011) Flooding Event *Highway 101 Days Closed  Spring 2011 43  Fall 2010 16  Spring 2010 27  Spring 2001 29  Spring 1997 18  Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 8 Summer 1993 27  Spring 1969 17  Spring 1965 15  * Table Note: Data extracted from the 2010 Minnesota River Flood Mitigation Study. The study noted data  from the following: Data for 2010 and 2011 was provided by MnDOT. Data for 1993, 1997 and 2001 were  obtained from the Trunk Highway 41 Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Data for 1965‐1969 were  estimates from historic hydrograph plots and assuming the road is closed for three days beyond the date  when the water level dropped below the closure elevation to conduct maintenance and restoration work.  Highway 101 currently closes when flood waters reach an elevation of approximately two feet below the low road elevation at the crossing, which requires closure at 709.4 feet. Table 1 below shows the surface elevations for the 10-year, 50-year, 100-year and 500-year flood events. As shown in the table, even a 10-year flood event can require closure of Highway 101. Exhibit 1 on the following page was taken from the Minnesota River Flood Mitigation Study. The exhibit illustrates Minnesota River flood events and the corresponding water elevations in relation to the current closure elevation set by MnDOT. Table 4: Existing TH 101 Flood Elevations, and associated Graph Showing the Frequency of Overtopping Events. Hydraulic Event Water Surface Elevation (ft, NGVD 29)  10‐Year Flood 712.0  50‐Year Flood 718.4  100‐Year Flood 720.7  500‐Year Flood 726.0  4.7.3 Construction Methods The proposed project is anticipated to be constructed over two construction seasons (summer 2014 through fall 2015). Maintaining travel during construction is proposed to the extent practical. Temporary closures will be required for the various roadways in the study area as certain stages of the project improvements are being constructed. A preliminary construction staging plan has been developed that allows traffic across the Minnesota River floodplain area throughout the duration of construction. Traffic would continue to use the existing roadway while the new four-lane bridge is constructed immediately west of the existing roadway. The causeway (existing land bridge) will be removed to the elevation of approximately 700 feet above mean sea Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 9 level, which is approximately 11-14 feet below the elevation of the existing road surface. The proposed improvements along Carver County Road 61/Flying Cloud Drive and the Highway 1010 Bridge will be staged in order to maintain traffic during construction to the greatest extent possible. Due to poor/muck soils found under the existing road, the reconstruction of County Road 61 will require the removal of these poor soils and replacement with a select granular sub-base material. The depth of excavation for purposes of correcting the soil material ranges from only a few feet to over twenty feet. The anticipated construction technique for the bridge across the floodplain area will consist of placing prefabricated beams on already constructed piers and abutments. Once the beams are placed, then the remaining operations of forming and pouring the bridge deck curb and gutter, and barriers can be completed. The portion of the project that consists of constructing new roadway will consist of placing and compacting material for new roadway and embankments. It is anticipated that the material excavated on the project will be re-used for overlay, aggregate or embankment purposes where appropriate and in accordance with best management practices established in MnDOT’s Standard Specifications for Construction. 4.7.4 Mobility The 2010 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) along the Highway 101 crossing and Trunk Highway 41 crossing was approximately 19,000 and 17,000 respectively. Traffic operations data indicates that two-lane roadways begin to experience noticeable problems once they exceed 10,500 – 12,000 vehicles per day. Design standards suggest that 4-lane roadways would be required based on existing traffic counts. 5.0 Wetlands 5.1.1 Wetland Delineations Prior to visiting the project area, resources were consulted to map potential wetlands (Level 1 Delineation). Resources used to estimate wetlands for the Level 1 Delineations include: National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping, DNR Public Water Inventory (PWI) mapping, County Soil Survey mapping, DNR Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) mapping, Floodplain Mapping, USGS Topographic Mapping, MnDOT Video Road Log, and Current and Historical Aerial Photography. These sources identify wetland areas that were investigated in greater detail during the field delineation. A field visit was conducted to verify all level 1 delineations on the MnDOT and Carver County Right-of-Way. The project site was examined conducted in August 2012, and June of 2013 for areas meeting the technical wetland criteria in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (USACE 2010). Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 10 5.2 Results Thirteen (23) wetlands were delineated within the project site by MnDOT and SEH as reported in the wetland delineation report, and as summarized in Table 1. These wetlands delineated by MnDOT are labeled with a “D” prefix, while those completed by SEH start with an ”S.” More detailed information on the wetland delineation is available in the Wetland Delineation Report. Table 5: Wetland Characteristics Basin ID Cowardin Classification Circular 39 Classification Eggers & Reed Classification S1 PEMB Type2 Fresh (wet) Meadow S2 PEMB/PEMA Type2/ Type 6 Fresh (wet) Meadow/ Floodplain Forest S3 PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh S4 PEMB Type 3 Shallow Marsh associated with Bluff Creek S5 PEMB Type2 Fresh (wet) Meadow S6 PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh S7 PEMB Type2 Fresh (wet) Meadow S8 PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh S9 PEMB Type2 Fresh (wet) Meadow S10 PEMB Type2 Fresh (wet) Meadow D1 PEMB Type2 Fresh (wet) Meadow D2 PFO1A Type 1L Floodplain Forest D3 PUBH Type 5 Shallow Open Water D4 PEMF Type 4 Deep Marsh D5 PUBH Type 5 Shallow Open Water D6 PSS1A Type 6 Shrub Swamp D7 PEMB Type 2 Sedge Meadow D8 PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh D9 PFO1A Type 1L Floodplain Forest D10 PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh D11 PFO1A Type 1L Floodplain Forest D12 PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh D13 PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh 5.2.1 Bluff Creek Bluff Creek is located within the project area, and flows from north to south along Wetland S4, and the west side of Wetland S7. North of CSAH 61 Bluff Creek is composed of a defined channel, with gabion walls on the west bank. The channel north of the project area is located through a heavily wooded area with a closed canopy. The channel bottom is composed of cobble and gravel. Bluff Creek passes through a two-barrel box culverts, of which the eastern barrel is buried with sand and is vegetated and is no longer used to convey flows outside of flood conditions. South of CSAH 61 the channel is more natural with riffles and pools and gentle meanders. Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 11 Bluff Creek passes through additional culverts under the eastern lane of Highway 101 and into the Minnesota River floodplain, where it has scoured and has regular maintenance concerns. 5.2.2 Minnesota River Floodplain The Highway 101 crossing goes through extensive wetlands and floodplain associated with the Minnesota River. This includes areas of shallow marsh, shallow open water, wet meadow, and wooded floodplain. For the project area, the wetland is along the toe of slope of the existing causeway crossing. A few areas have wider cross sections, but the causeway is entirely composed of fill material. 6.0 Sequencing 6.1 Project Alternatives, Avoidance, and Minimization Within the project purpose and need, design alternatives that would avoid and minimize impacts were considered. Minimizing wetland impacts for the project remains difficult due to the location of the wetlands adjacent to the roadways. Design measures such as changes to the roadway profile, steeper slopes and minimized clear zones have been implemented to help reduce the impact to the wetland. Several alternatives were investigated (Appendix D- TH 101 “Wye” Feasibility Study). These alternatives were primarily disregarded due to engineering issues, as the majority of them impacted approximately the same amount of wetland. 6.1.1 No-build Alternative The No-Build Alternate would involve no improvements being made and retains the existing configuration of intersections within the project area. The No-Build Alternate does not preclude ongoing maintenance work. The No-Build Alternate provides the basis of comparison, or benchmark, for the Build Alternative and includes the impacts associated with doing nothing. The No-Build Alternative was not identified as the preferred alternative because it fails to address the project purpose and need or satisfied the project goals and objectives listed above. 6.1.2 CSAH 61 Alternative 1 – Design and Location Alternatives Preliminary plans included the relocation of CSAH 61 to the north of the existing alignment. This alternative would provides over 1,100 linear feet between the new intersection and the TH 101 North intersection. This alternative would meet future traffic demand, but included a need to grade into the bluff. These plans required raising the elevation of the TH 101 north intersection approximately 8 feet. Alternative 1 would have added acres of impacts to Wetlands S3, S4, S5/6 and D13, and would reduce impacts to Wetland 1. Impacts associated with the roundabout would be unchanged, as the route would continue to go through Wetland D11. Alternative locations of the roundabout were also considered, but any adjustment from the proposed location would result in additional impacts to wetlands D6 and D9 (Minnesota River, as opposed to depressional wetland). The loss of wetland D11 is the greatest impact on the project, but the adjustment to Knowing that impacts to Wetland D11 were unavoidable, it was determined to concentrate the impacts to one Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 12 area, and reduce the overall quantity of impacts to other, potentially higher quality, wetlands. Roundabouts have a larger footprint than traditional intersections, and because of this, a smaller footprint alternative was considered. Because of the location of the intersection in the middle of wetland D11, a traditional intersection would not reduce impacts. This is in part due the extensive amount of souls correction involved, which expands the construction limits past what would be considered discharge for the roadway. Because of these factors, the roundabout was selected as it provided the greatest safety improvement, and does not diminish the wetland impacts. The alternatives of locating CSAH 61 further north, siting he roundabout in a different location, and using a traditional intersection were all dismissed, as they all had greater or no decrease in wetland impacts, required additional right of way, or had greater cost. 6.1.3 Highway 101 Alternative 2 – Design and Location Alternatives Highway 101 was considered for multiple construction and alignment alternatives. Analysis of raising the causeway to a higher elevation was considered but quickly dismissed, as it would have extensive wetland impacts, and would have caused an increase in flood elevations. No quantify of impacts were calculated for this alternative, but have been estimated to exceed 25 acres of wetland fill. Alternative alignments to Highway 101 were also considered, but ultimately the alignment that follows as close to existing would have the least amount of impact. Construction alternatives were considered, and provided the greatest opportunity to avoid and minimize wetland impacts. The original plans for the bridge construction proposed to set the piers into constructed riprap islands. These islands would protect the piers from scour and debris, but would have a considerable footprint of discharge into wetland. Impacts from the island piers would have added between 5and 6 acres of wetland impacts. The decision to go with unprotected bent piles, eliminate the riprap, and reduced impacts to the Minnesota River floodplain to only 9,350 sf. 6.1.4 Alternative 3 – Preferred Alternative The Preferred Alternative includes plans for a new bridge across the Minnesota River to replace the existing Highway 101 causeway. Construction of the new bridge will allow for the removal of the existing causeway (fill material) from the Minnesota River 100-year floodplain area The new bridge will elevate the roadway approximately 3 feet to 22 feet above the existing roadway, which will raise the roadway above of the 100-year flood elevation and consequently minimize road closures from flooding without increasing the 100-year flood elevation. The use of unprotected bent piers significantly reduced impacts for the bridge portion of the project. The removal of the causeway is also a major environmental improvement by restoring the wetland, and reconnecting areas of Minnesota River floodplain. The CSAH 61/Flying Cloud Drive roadway improvements include adding safety through two new roundabout intersections at the Highway 101 “Wye” and Bluff Creek Drive intersections. The existing high traffic volumes are also addressed by adding a four-lane roadway section between the Highway 101 “Wye” intersection on the east and Bluff Creek Road on the west. In addition, the CSAH 61/Flying Cloud Drive Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 13 improvements include a traffic signal at the Highway 101 (American Boulevard)/Flying Cloud Drive intersection. 6.1.5 Summary of avoidance and minimization Wetland impact avoidance and minimization has successfully been achieved with this project. When the project was initially designed, before the design could be refined, the impacts were estimated to be approximately 11.5 acres of lost wetland. By locating CSAH 61 closer to the existing alignment, and reducing the extent of soils corrections needed, the impact were reduced to approximately 7.5acres. The use of bent pile piers for the new bridge further reduced impacts to the current 4.96 acres. In total, impacts have been reduced by more than 50% through design refinements. 7.0 Wetland Impacts The proposed project will result in the permanent loss of wetland habitat. Wetland impacts will result from the direct placement of fill material into wetland habitat, and convert the area into non-wetland. Additional impacts are the result of excavation to incorporate those areas into storm water treatment features. In addition to wetland, the project proposes to realign Bluff Creek, which is a MNDNR Public Water. The construction of the new Highway 101 bridge will also impact Public Water, consisting of Minnesota River backwater and floodplain areas. Wetland impacts are summarized in Table 6. Table 6 Wetland Impacts Basin ID Cowardin Classification Circular 39 Classification Eggers & Reed Classification Impact Type Wetland Impacts (acres) S1 PEMB Type 2 Fresh (wet) Meadow Fill 0.44 S1 PEMB Type 2 Fresh (wet) Meadow Excavation 0.05 S2 PEMB Type 2 Fresh (wet) Meadow Fill 0.44 S3 PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh Fill 0.21 S5/S6 PEMB Type 2 Fresh (wet) Meadow Fill 0.66 S8 PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh Fill 0.01 S8 PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh Excavation 0.01 D11 PEMB/PEMC Type 2/3 Fresh (wet) Meadow, Shallow Marsh Fill 1.99 D11 PEMB Type 2 Fresh (wet) Meadow Excavation 0.47 Bluff Creek PEMB Type 2 Fresh (wet) Meadow Realignment 0.47 Minnesota River Crossing PEMC Type 3 Shallow Marsh Bent Piers 0.21 Total Impacts 4.96 acres 7.1 Bluff Creek Impacts As part of the proposed action, the culverts under CSAH 61 and under TH 101 will be removed and replaced with bridges. A new 36’ x 101’ bridge is proposed to be constructed along CSAH 61/Flying Cloud Drive to allow Bluff Creek and a new pedestrian trail to pass under the roadway. Construction of the proposed project requires the removal of unsuitable organic material below the proposed roadway. The Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 14 removal extents of this project combined with the roadway footprint for the proposed project result in the channel being impacted in its entirety. The creek channel is also proposed to be relocated as part of the proposed roundabout intersection design. Nearly 500 linear feet of the creek, located between CSAH 61 and Highway 101 will be realigned as part of the project. The future channel will be approximately 100 feet longer, and has been designed to meander to provide additional habitat for wildlife and eliminate the current steep (2.3% slope) and incorporate a natural channel bottom. The river banks of the realigned Bluff Creek will be graded to allow for natural vegetation. The proposed stream design will no decrease the length of the existing channel. Benefits of the creek realignment include reestablishing a natural flow which has been obstructed from the existing culverts. The resulting design will decrease overall flow velocities at the roadway crossing. This will allow a more appropriate velocity for fish passage. The stream bed and banks will be seeded using native vegetation mixes. 7.2 Pedestrian Trail Impacts The project includes the construction of a trail, which will connect with existing regional trail systems. The trail is located on the north side of CSAH 61, and will share the bridge crossing of Bluff Creek. The trail will have wetland impacts of 0.08 acres. Impacts have been minimized by placing the trail within the area of the construction limits that already has soils correction, which has already been considered an impact for the roadway. 7.1 Wetland Re-establishment Construction of the new bridge will allow for the removal of the existing causeway (fill material) from the Minnesota River 100-year floodplain area. The removal of the existing Highway 101 causeway across the Minnesota River floodplain area will have a positive effect by allowing restoration of natural wetland/floodplain habitat to re- establish. Approximately 427,983 ft2 (9.82 acres) are anticipated to re-establish natural wetland/floodplain habitat through the removal of the exiting causeway. This cannot be claimed as mitigation, but is a substantial environmental benefit. 8.0 Wetland Replacement Plan Wetland replacement is proposed through the BWSR road program and Wetland Banking. The replacement plan for the Southwest Reconnection Project is summarized in Table 7. Descriptions of the plan are found in the following paragraphs. Table 7 Summary of Wetland Replacement Plan by Bank Site Impact Source Mitigation Source Wetland Impacts (acres) Wetland Mitigation (acres) at 2:1 ratio Roadway, bridge. and storm water ponds BWSR Road Bank 4.88 9.76 Pedestrian trail German Settlement Bank #1175 0.08 0.16 Totals 4.96 9.92 Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 15 8.1.1 BWSR Road Program The reconstruction of the Highway 61/101 Flood Mitigation project has been proposed as a safety improvement. In addition to flood mitigation, the roadway and intersection improvements along Carver County Road 61/Flying Cloud Drive will improve safety and capacity based on existing traffic volumes. On the basis that the project is proposed primarily for safety improvements, and the project is being led by a local road authority (Carver County), it is proposed to complete the compensatory mitigation requirements through the Board of Water and Soil Resources road safety program. The road components of the project propose to impact a total of 4.88 acres of wetland habitat. This includes areas of both fill and excavation, and includes area of Public Waters. It is proposed to provide mitigation at a 2:1 ratio, which would require the withdrawal of 9.76 acres of wetland from the BWSR road program. It is requested that BWSR identify the bank to be uses as part of this project review. 8.1.2 Wetland Banking Additional impacts are anticipated due to the proposed pedestrian trail. These impacts cannot be mitigated using the BWSR road bank and thus a mitigation plan is outlined below. Unavoidable impacts to wetlands will be replaced in accordance with the rules and requirements of the USACE and the Minnesota WCA. The preferred method of wetland replacement is by purchasing credits from an approved wetland bank. The USACE rules require a base replacement ratio of 2.5:1 in Carver County for wetland impacts, with incentives to reduce that ratio to a minimum of 2:1. Incentives are offered if the wetland mitigation is provided “in kind,” with wetland replacement being the same type as that impacted; “in place,” in the same wetland bank service area; and “in advance,” or prior to the impacts from the proposed action. In Carver County, the replacement ratio begins at 2.5:1 and decreases incrementally by 0.25:1 for each of the three incentives that are met with a minimum ratio of 2:1. In wetland banking situations, the “in advance” requirement is met if the wetland credits are purchased from an approved wetland bank. WCA requirements stipulate a standard wetland replacement ratio of 2.5:1 for impacts in a <50% area, 50-80% area, or non-agricultural land that are replaced outside the BSA or County and a standard ratio of 2:1 when those impacts are replaced within the same BSA or County. SEH contacted several banks located in BSA #9 from the BWSR Available Wetland Bank Credits Database. Wetland credits from the Scott County wetland bank, German Settlement (No. 1175) will be used for compensatory mitigation. Bank 1175 is located within is within BSA #9 and major watershed #33-Minnesota (Shakopee), and has sufficient credits available. A replacement ratio of 2:1 will be applied for both the USACE and for the WCA. The proposed replacement via wetland banking is considered “in advance” and “in place” Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 16 and qualifies for both of these two 0.25:1 reduction incentives under USACE Mitigation Policy. The proposed wetland bank is within the same BSA as the impacts, there therefore the required replacement under the WCA is also 2:1. To mitigate the 0.08 acres (3,593 sf) of wetland impact associated with the Proposed Action, a total of 0.16 acres (7187 sf) of wetland credit will be withdrawn from bank site No. 1175. 9.0 Permitting and Regulatory Jurisdiction Wetlands in the project area are regulated by several agencies at the local, regional, state, and federal levels including the USACE and the EPA at the federal level; the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) at the state level; the Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District at the regional level; and Carver County at the local level. The City of Chanhassen has accepted the responsibility for the administration of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) of 1991, on the basis that the majority of impacts are within the city limits. Specific permit actions are described below. 9.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers All of the wetlands in the project area are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination would be accepted. This permit application is a request for a Letter of Permission, and acceptance of the use of the BWSR bank for wetland replacement related to the roadway safety improvements. It is requested that the use of the German Settlement Bank be allowed for impacts associated with the pedestrian trail. Mitigation is proposed at a 2:1 ratio for all aspects of the project. All of the 4.96 acres of impacts are regulated by the USACE. It is requested that 401 Water Quality Certification be completed in conjunction with this review, and that waiver of LOP projects be considered. In anticipation of this, a copy of this application has not been provided to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 9.2 Wetland Conservation Act – City of Chanhassen The City of Chanhassen is responsible for administration of the WCA in the project area. The project is eligible for Replacement Plan Approval under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act for impacts to wetland within the project area. Of the 4.96 acres of impacts, the WCA only regulates those that are not also MNDNR Public Waters. The impacts to Bluff Creek (0.47 acres) and the Minnesota River (0.21 acres) are not under the jurisdiction of the WCA. Therefore, the impacts under the WCA are 4.28 acres. This permit application is a request for Replacement Plan Approval under the rules of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. A copy of the Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Form for Water/Wetland Projects is included at the beginning of this document. Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 17 Compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts is proposed through withdrawal of 9.76 acres of credits from the BWSR transportation bank and 0.16 acres from wetland bank No. 1175. The request for replacement exceeds the WCA requirements, as it includes mitigation for lost areas of Public Water. This is consistent for the BWSR to provide mitigation for all impacts related to a project, not just those under the jurisdiction of the WCA. 9.3 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources The MNDNR is responsible for all public waters and public waters wetlands in the project area. This permit application describes project activities with Bluff Creek (realignment) and the Minnesota River (bent piers for new bridge). An existing 421 feet of Bluff Creek, with an area of 0.47 acres, will be relocated to create a new channel. The new channel will be 529 feet, and will also replace two culver crossings with bridges. Although the net area of Bluff Creek will increase, the loss of the existing channel is proposed for replacement via the BWSR road bank. This is consistent with past projects of a similar impact. The placement of bent piles in the Minnesota River floodplain (Public Waters 10- 221W and 27-132P, Rice Lake) is also considered an impact, although it is a structural discharge. The area of the bent piles is estimated to be a total of 0.21 acres (9,350 sf),based on an estimate of 374 piles within wetland, and an average area of 25 square feet for each structure. Mitigation is proposed for these impacts, as they are permanent. It is requested that although it is not eligible for use as mitigation, that the restoration of the former causeway, and the addition of 9.82 acres of Public Water Wetland be considered in the overall review of this project. This permit application is a request for permission to work in the bed of Bluff Creek, Public Water 132P, and Public Water Wetland 10-221W. A copy of the Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Form for Waters/Wetlands Projects is included at the beginning of this document. An electronic submittal has also been made through MPARS. 10.0 Supplemental Information In addition to the wetland components, the project has been reviewed for a variety of ancillary topics. These are discussed below. 10.1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife and MNDNR Property The large portion of the project area lies adjacent to wildlife management areas; US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) MN Valley National Wildlife Refuge and the DNR Raquet Wildlife Management Area (WMA). The portion of the project area that crosses the Minnesota River floodplain as had no previous development except for the construction of Highway 101. The floodplain habitat found adjacent to the highway corridor primarily consists of forested wetlands and grasslands. Along Carver CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive), there are scattered private parcels with recent land disturbances that can be characterized as more rural commercial and residential development Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 18 Construction of the proposed project will be staged such that the project will not occupy either temporarily (during construction) or permanently within the US FWS Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge property. Since the eastern boundary of the designated Raquet WMA abuts the existing Highway 101 causeway across the Minnesota River floodplain area, a narrow strip of the WMA will be affected by the construction of the new bridge. Furthermore, a small permanent right- of-way will be needed from the MNDNR on a parcel of property owned by the MNDNR near the north end of the proposed bridge. A land transfer between the MnDNR and MnDOT has been previously discussed and since Highway 101 will be turned back to Carver and Scott Counties a local jurisdictional transfer of the roadway and right-of-way is planned to occur 10.2 State Threatened and Endangered Species The Minnesota NHIS has been queried to determine if any rare plant or animal species, native plant communities, or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one-mile radius of the project area. Based on this query, rare features have been documented within the search area. The Minnesota River contains several types of rare species (fish and native mussel species). A restoration of the floodway should ultimately provide aspects for their benefit; precautions should be taken not to cause adverse impact during construction. With appropriate sediment control measures during construction, the MNDNR does not believe the project will negatively affect any known occurrences of rare features. A Scientific and Natural Area (SNA), is located a short distance southwest from the immediate Southwest Reconnection Project study area. The SNA includes a rare calcareous fen (known as the Seminary Fen) with threatened plant species. According to the MNDNR, the establishment of a SNA is intended to preserve and perpetuate the ecological diversity of Minnesota's natural heritage, including landforms, fossil remains, plant and animal communities, rare and endangered species, or other biotic features and geological formations, for scientific study and public edification as components of a healthy environment. Continued coordination with the MNDNR and LMRWD will occur to ensure no impacts occur to the Seminary Fen as a result of the proposed improvements. 10.3 Storm Water Treatment In accordance with the requirements of the NPDES permit, the roadway design will include storm water treatment BMPs that will be designed and built to comply with the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit requirements (in effect prior to August 2013), Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD) volume control standards and City of Chanhassen storm water design standards. The project includes two planned filtration basins and two wet detention ponds to treat runoff from the local roadway, bridge and intersection improvements. 10.4 Archeological Resources The proposed project was reviewed for archaeological, historical, and architectural resources. No historic structures eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) were identified in the study area. However, Phase 1 and Phase 2 investigations were completed for several potentially eligible archaeological sites. Background research was conducted at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office and Minnesota History Center Library prior to field surveys. Research Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 19 included a review of previously recorded sites, historic plat maps, and historic accounts of Native American sites along the Minnesota River near Shakopee. No sites were recorded in the project area from these sources. Below is a summary of field investigations for four sites that could be impacted by the proposed roadway improvements. Site 21CR154 - This site is a precontact habitation that consists of a sparse amount of lithic debris, fire-cracked rocks, and animal bone. Site activities are inferred to include animal processing, cooking, and lithic reduction. The portion of the site within the existing road right-of-way was evaluated and was recommended not eligible for listing on the NRHP. A small portion of the site was surveyed outside of the road right-of-way, and this portion of the site is recommended for further Phase 2 investigations. In summary, a total of 31 deep auger tests were dug in five and ten- meter intervals at the site, with only seven tests containing artifacts. Artifacts were recovered from 0 to 80 cm below surface. Two (1 x 1 meter) excavation units were also dug, but neither unit contained artifacts. Site 21CR155 - This site is an early Archaic or Late Paleoindian habitation that consists of a moderate amount of lithic debris, stone tools, fire-cracked rocks, and butchered and calcined (burned) animal bone (bison or elk). Site activities are inferred to include animal processing, cooking, lithic reduction, and stone tool production. A total of 42 deep auger tests were dug in five and ten-meter intervals, with30 tests containing artifacts. Seven (1 x 1 meter) excavation units were also dug. Artifacts were recovered from 100 to 240 cm below surface, with most recovered from a buried soil between 220 and 240 cm. Lithic materials include Knife River Flint and Hixton Quartzite that derive from western North Dakota and west-central Wisconsin. Radiocarbon dating was performed on the animal bone (bison or elk) and provided a conventional date of 7160 BP1 (+/-30), with a 2 Sigma Calibration of 8020 to 7940 BP. The evaluation results indicate that the site has the potential to provide important information on the precontact period because of the site’s research potential and the well-preserved cultural deposits that have integrity. The site is recommended eligible for listing on the NRHP, and a Phase 3 data recovery is recommended if the site can’t be avoided. Site 21CR156 – This site is a precontact habitation that consists of a moderate amount of Late Woodland ceramics, lithic debris, stone tools, and animal bone. Site activities are inferred to include animal processing, cooking, lithic reduction, and stone tool production. A total of 50 deep auger tests were dug in five-meter intervals, with 35 tests containing artifacts. Artifacts were recovered from 20 to 240 cm below surface. Eight (1 x 1 meter) excavation units were also dug. The site contains stratified Late Woodland, Archaic, and Late Paleoindian components. Radiocarbon dating was conducted on calcined/burned turtle bone, which provided a conventional date of 7040 +/- 30 BP, with a 2 Sigma Calibration of 7940 to 7830 BP. The evaluation results indicate that the site has the potential to provide important information on the precontact period because of the site’s research potential and the well-preserved cultural deposits that have integrity. The site is recommended eligible for listing on the 1 Before Present (BP) years is a time scale used in archaeology, geology, and other scientific disciplines to specify when events in the past occurred. Because the "present" time changes, standard practice is to use 1 January 1950 as the origin of the age scale, reflecting the fact that radiocarbon dating became practicable in the 1950s. Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 20 NRHP. The site will be avoided since it has been determined that the site is located outside the construction limits of the Southwest Reconnection Project. Site 21CR157 - This site is a precontact habitation that consists of lithic debris, fire- cracked rock, and animal bone. Site activities are inferred to include animal processing, cooking, and lithic reduction. The site is buried below modern fill, and three tests contained artifacts from 130 to 300 cm below surface. The site is recommended for further Phase 2 investigations. Since the project will require a US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) wetland permit, it is following the federal Section 106 process. Carver County has coordinated with USACE and the MnDOT Cultural Resources Unit on the required tribal consultation and will be developing a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that will detail the process for mitigating impacted archaeological sites. List of Figures Figure 1 – Site Location and Topographic Map Figure 2 – Aerial Photograph (2012) Figure 3 – MNDNR Public Waters Inventory Figure 4 – National Wetlands Inventory Figure 5 – Soil Survey for Carver and Scott Counties Figure 6 – Wetland Impacts Figure 6-1- Wetland Impacts – West Side CSAH 61 Figure 6-2 – Wetland Impacts – West Side CSAH 61 Figure 6-3 - Wetland Impacts – Highway 101 This Page Left Blank Intentionally Site Location and Topographic MapProject: CARVR 119938 Figure 1 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 FAX: (888) 908-8166 TF: (800) 325-2055 www.sehinc.com Map by: RB/BPT Projection: UTM NAD83 15N Source: MnDOT, SEHInc Background: USGS 24k Topo Print Date: 7/18/2013) This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Minnesota River Flood Plain Bridge Replacement and Improvements Carver & Scott Counties, Minnesota ± 00.250.5 Miles EXPLANATION Area of Investigation Th i s P a g e L e f t B l a n k I n t e n t i o n a l l y   Aerial Photograph (2012) CarverScott ?A101 UV61 UV61 B l u ffCreekDr UV69 Project: CARVR 119938 Figure 2 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 FAX: (888) 908-8166 TF: (800) 325-2055 www.sehinc.com Map by: RB/BPT Projection: UTM NAD83 15N Source: MnDOT, SEHInc Background: MnDNR 2012 Print Date: 7/18/2013) This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. TH 101 / CSAH 61 Road Improvements Carver & Scott Counties, Minnesota ± 05001,0001,500 Feet EXPLANATION Area of Investigation Th i s P a g e L e f t B l a n k I n t e n t i o n a l l y   MNDNR Public Waters Inventory A s s u m pt i o n C re e k Assu m ption C r e ek M i n n e s o t a R i v e r Minnesota River M i n ne s o t a R i v e r Bl uff C r eekUnnamed10-220 W Unnamed10-221 WUnnamed10-222 W Unnamed10-223 W Rice27-132 P Strunks70-116 P UV61 UV61?A101 KL212 UV69 UV101 Project: CARVR 119938 Figure 3 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 FAX: (888) 908-8166 TF: (800) 325-2055 www.sehinc.com Map by: RB/BPT Projection: UTM NAD83 15N Source: MnDOT, SEHInc Background: MnDNR 2012 Print Date: 1/27/2014) This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. TH 101 / CSAH 61 Road Improvements Carver & Scott Counties, Minnesota ±05001,0001,500 Feet EXPLANATION Area of Investigation PWI Watercourses PWI Basins Th i s P a g e L e f t B l a n k I n t e n t i o n a l l y   National Wetlands Inventory He n n e p i n Ca r v e r He n n e p i n Sc o t t CarverScott L1UBH PE M C P E M F PFO/SS1C P E M C PEMC P E M Bd PFO 1 C PEMC PSS/F O 1 C PEM/SS1C PFO/S S 1 C PEMC R 2UBH R 2 U B H P E M /S S 1 C P E M A PUBGx P E M F P F O 1 C PFO/SS1C PEMA P F O 1 C P E M F PSS1/EMCPEMCd P E M F PEMC PFO1C P F O 1 A PEMAPFO1C PEMCPEMCPUBG PFO1A PFO1CPEM/SS1Bd PUBGx PFO1C PFO1C PFO1/EMCPSS1C PFO1A PFO1CPEMCPSS/FO1C PSS/FO1C PEMC PFO/SS1C PFO1CPFO1C PEMC PEMC PSS1CPEMC PSS/FO1C PEMC PEMCdPEMAPUBF PEMC ?A101 UV61 UV61 UV69 UV101 Project: CARVR 119938 Figure 4 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 FAX: (888) 908-8166 TF: (800) 325-2055 www.sehinc.com Map by: RB/BPT Projection: UTM NAD83 15N Source: MnDOT, SEHInc, USFWS Background: MnDNR 2012 Print Date: 7/18/2013) This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. TH 101 / CSAH 61 Road Improvements Carver & Scott Counties, Minnesota ±05001,0001,500 Feet EXPLANATION Area of Investigation NWI Legend Type 1 - Seasonal Type 2 - Wet Meadow Type 3 - Shallow Marsh Type 4 - Deep Marsh Type 5 - Shallow Open Water Type 6 - Scrub Shrub Type 7 - Forested Th i s P a g e L e f t B l a n k I n t e n t i o n a l l y   Soil Survey for Carver and Scott Counties CarverScott KD2 BH W KC2KC2 KC2 KE2 MN MNAE HD TC YE MN YD TB MN TC MN MN KM TB EBCH EB MN MN O S KM W KF KFKFKF KF KL KC 2 KC2 K C 2KC W W Ab AaA Oa IN T INT Dd Dc AaB AaA A a A Oa Dd AaB AaA ScAbAb Project: CARVR 119938 Figure 5 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 FAX: (888) 908-8166 TF: (800) 325-2055 www.sehinc.com Map by: RB/BPT Projection: UTM NAD83 15N Source: MnDOT, SEHInc, NRCS Background: MnDNR 2012 Print Date: 7/18/2013) This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. TH 101 / CSAH 61 Road Improvements Carver & Scott Counties, Minnesota ± 05001,0001,500 Feet EXPLANATION Area of Investigation SSURGO Hydric Rating All hydric Partially hydric Unknown (water) Not hydric SymbolMap Unit Name SymbolMap Unit Name AEHawick loamy sand, 18 to 40 percent slopes TBTerril loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes BHBlue Earth mucky silt loam TCTerril loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes CHChaska loam, occasionally flooded WWater EBEstherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes YDRasset-Lester-Kilkenny complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes HDEstherville-Hawick sandy loams, 12 to 18 percent slopesYERasset-Lester-Kilkenny complex, 18 to 25 percent slopes KCLester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes AaAAlluvial land, 0 to 2 percent slopes KC2Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedAaBAlluvial land, 2 to 6 percent slopes KD2Lester-Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, erodedAbAlluvial land, frequent overflow, 0 to 6 percent slopes KE2Lester-Kilkenny loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, erodedDcDorchester loam and silt loam KFLester-Kilkenny loams, 25 to 40 percent slopes DdDorchester silty clay loam KLHanlon-Kalmarville complex, frequently flooded INTWater, intermittent KMMinneiska-Kalmarville complex, frequently flooded OaOshawa silty clay loam MNMinneiska loam ScStony land OSOshawa silty clay loam Th i s P a g e L e f t B l a n k I n t e n t i o n a l l y   3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 FAX: (651) 490-2150 WATTS: 800-325-2055 www.sehinc.com Ma p D o c u m e n t : ( L : \ R e s o u r c e s \ C a r t o g r a p h i c \ T e m p l a t e s \ E m p t y L a y o u t s \ A _ A N S I _ 8 x 1 1 L \ 8 x 1 1 L _ S t d _ N e a t l i n e . m x d ) 2/ 1 3 / 2 0 0 9 - - 1 1 : 4 6 : 3 3 A M Wetland Impacts - Overall Project Figure 6 This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Project: CARVR 119938 Print Date: 12/20/2013 Map by: drd Projection: UTM NAD 83 Source: LMIC TH 61 and CSAH 101 Roadway Improvements Carver and Scott Counties, Minnesota West Half CSAH 61 1.11 acres of fill 0.05 acres of excavation 1.16 acres total impact TH 101 Bridge Crossing 374 bent piers within wetland 0.21 acres wetland fill ³ 1,000 Feet Wetland ImpactsImpact Type Fill Excavation Bluff Creek Construction Limits East Half CSAH 61 2.66 acres of fill 0.52 acres of excavation 0.47 acres within Bluff Creek 3.65 acres total impact TH 101 Bridge Crossing Removal of causeway 9.82 acres of wetland restored Total Impacts: 3.76 acres wetland fill 0.52 acres wetland excavation 0.47 acres to Bluff Creek 0.21 to Minnesota River floodplain Total: 4.96 acres Total Restoration: 9.82 acres restored Minnesota River floodplain This Page Left Blank Intentionally Wetland 20.36 Acres Fill Wetland 30.21 Acres Fill Wetland 20.08 Acres Fill Wetland 10.44 Acres FillWetland 10.05 Acres Excavation 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 FAX: (651) 490-2150 WATTS: 800-325-2055 www.sehinc.com Ma p D o c u m e n t : ( L : \ R e s o u r c e s \ C a r t o g r a p h i c \ T e m p l a t e s \ E m p t y L a y o u t s \ A _ A N S I _ 8 x 1 1 L \ 8 x 1 1 L _ S t d _ N e a t l i n e . m x d ) 2/ 1 3 / 2 0 0 9 - - 1 1 : 4 6 : 3 3 A M Wetland Impacts Figure 6-1 This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Project: CARVR 119938 Print Date: 12/20/2013 Map by: drd Projection: UTM NAD 83 Source: LMIC TH 61 and CSAH 101 Roadway Improvements Carver and Scott Counties, Minnesota ³ 100 Feet Wetland ImpactsImpact Type Fill Excavation Purgatory Creek Construction Plans Roadway Features Trail; Trail Features Storm Water Features Construction Limits Th i s P a g e L e f t B l a n k I n t e n t i o n a l l y   Bluff Creek0.47 Acres Fill Wetland 50.44 Acres Fill Wetland 111.99 Acres Fill Wetland 50.15 Acres Fill Wetland 110.47 Acres Excavation Wetland 50.01 Acres Fill 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 FAX: (651) 490-2150 WATTS: 800-325-2055 www.sehinc.com Ma p D o c u m e n t : ( L : \ R e s o u r c e s \ C a r t o g r a p h i c \ T e m p l a t e s \ E m p t y L a y o u t s \ A _ A N S I _ 8 x 1 1 L \ 8 x 1 1 L _ S t d _ N e a t l i n e . m x d ) 2/ 1 3 / 2 0 0 9 - - 1 1 : 4 6 : 3 3 A M Wetland Impacts Figure 6-2 This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Project: CARVR 119938 Print Date: 12/20/2013 Map by: drd Projection: UTM NAD 83 Source: LMIC TH 61 and CSAH 101 Roadway Improvements Carver and Scott Counties, Minnesota ³ 100 Feet Wetland Impacts Impact Type Fill Excavation Bluff Creek Construction Plans Roadway Features Trail; Trail Features Storm Water Features Construction Limits Th i s P a g e L e f t B l a n k I n t e n t i o n a l l y   Wetland ImpactsProject: CARVR 119938 Figure 6-3 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ST. PAUL, MN 55110 PHONE: (651) 490-2000 FAX: (888) 908-8166 TF: (800) 325-2055 www.sehinc.com TH 61 and CSAH 101 Roadway ImprovementsMap by: drd Projection: UTM NAD 83 Source: LMIC Print Date: 1/27/2014 Carver and Scott Counties, Minnesota This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information, and data gathered from various sources listed on this map and is to be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and SEH does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking, or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The user of this map acknowledges that SEH shall not be liable for any damages which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Pa t h : C : \ U s e r s \ r b e d u h n \ D o c u m e n t s \ G N S S P r o j e c t s \ C a r v e r \ I m p a c t s M a p s \ F i g 6 - 3 W e t l a n d I m p a c t s . m x d ³ Minnesota River0.21 Acres FIll 374 Bent Piles25 sf per pileTotal Impacts: 9,350 sf pile impacts Existing Causeway to be removed 9.82 Acres Restored Wetland Impacts Impact Type Fill Excavation Purgatory Creek Construction Plans Roadway Features Trail; Trail Features Storm Water Features Construction Limits 400 Feet This Page Left Blank Intentionally Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 22 Appendix A Project Plan Sheets This Page Left Blank Intentionally     The TH 101 Project Plan Sheets are located on the attached CD at the end of this document.  This Page Left Blank Intentionally Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 23 Appendix B Wetland Delineation Report This Page Left Blank Intentionally     The TH 101 Wetland Delineation Report is located on the attached CD at the end of this document.  This Page Left Blank Intentionally Wetland Permit Application CARVR 119938 Carver County Page 24 Appendix C TH 101 “Wye” Feasibility Study This Page Left Blank Intentionally     The TH 101 “Wye” Feasibility Study is located on the attached CD at the end of this document.  This Page Left Blank Intentionally Appendix D Combined Wetland Application Forms This Page Left Blank Intentionally Appendix E Wetland Banking Forms This Page Left Blank Intentionally This Page Left Blank Intentionally Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits from the Minnesota Wetland Bank  BWSR Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form Rev 10/3/2013 Page 2 of 2  4. Withdrawal Information To be completed by seller of credits (account holder). Bank Service Area: 9 Account Number: 1175 County: Scott Credit Subgroup Letter Plant Community Type Cost per Credit (acre) Number of Credits to be Withdrawn (acre) (acre=ft2/43560) Cost of Purchased Credits (cost per credit x number of credits) B Tributary $43560.00 0.1650 $7187.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL 0.1650 $7187.40 Table: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/2013_Fee_Schedule.pdf Enter County Fee from Table (county of seller’s bank) 6.5% of sale price 2995.00 Transaction Fee (choose either amount) Above TOTAL x County Fee $ 494.18 $ 467.18 Attach check payable to Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. By signature below I seller and holder of the aforementioned account in the State of Minnesota Wetland Mitigation Bank certify that: 1) The credits described in this application have been sold to the credit user or will be used for my own project; 2) I have received payment in full from the buyer (if applicable); 3) The credits described in this application have not been sold or used in any way to mitigate wetland losses other than for the project and location identified in the wetland impact information block on the previous page; 4) The credits described in this application should be withdrawn from my account; and 5) I will not have a negative balance of credits after the subject credits are debited from my account Seller Name (print): Seller Signature: Date: ____________ Seller e-mail*: 1. The account holder of the credits is responsible for submittal of this form, containing signatures, to the BWSR Wetland Bank Administrator so the affected account can be properly debited. 2. No impacts to any wetland or other water resource may commence until the credits have been debited and a copy of this form with stamped debit date has been received by the regulatory authority(ies), the account holder, and the credit user. When this form is completed and all required signatures are obtained, send with the fee check to: Wetland Bank Administration Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North Saint Paul, MN 55155