Loading...
1a. Amendment to Article 16, Kurvers Pt Dev Contract 1 .., , CITY OF I 1 _ , . _ , 1/4.1 . \, \ CHANHASSEN 1 ,L, ., „,,,,,, _:.- 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 I (612) 937-1900 Actin Li G+y A.,' .1i,t-,tar MEMORANDUM / ^� II TO: Don Ashworth , City Manager - t•.° ': M._____4.__...m,.. FROM: Larry Brown, Staff Engineer �� `.+�t`��`a � a� I eat C,;1,n si, DATE: November 22 , 1988 Date Su`,1nr:tLI LI ,wie[; 1 SUBJ: Trail Compensation j ��: . 1.:r, Kurvers Point Subdivision File No. 87-20 (pvt) I On November 14, 1988 , the City Council tabled action on this item 1 until the City Attorney could prepare the appropriate wordage to amend the Development Contract for the trail compensation issue (refer to Attachment No. 1) . II Attached you will find the memorandum from City Attorney Roger Knutson amending Section 16 of the Development Contract to state that the established trail fee shall be collected at the time of I the issuance of a building permit and that the trail may be installed by the City in the future along Kurvers Point Road. I It is therefore recommended that the City Council accept the amendment to Section 16 of the Kurvers Point Development Contract as depicted in the City Attorney' s memorandum dated November 22 , 1988 (refer to Attachment #2) . I Attachments I1 . November 14 , 1988 staff report and City Council minutes. 2 . November 22 , 1988 memorandum from the City Attorney. 1 1 1 1 1 CITYOF \ i G 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Larry Brown, Staff Engineer 446 DATE: November 9, 1988 ✓'� SUBJ: Review of Kurvers Point Trail Compensation File No. 87-20, Mel and Frank Kurvers On September 14, 1987, the City Council approved the Development Contract for II the Kurvers Point Subdivision. Section 16 of the Development Contract (refer to Attachment No. 1) states that the compensation for the installation of the trail shall be determined by the City Council at the time of the trail plan approval. Staff is recommending that the fees for the construction of the Kurvers Point subdivision be collected as part of the issuance of the building permits. This is the manner in which the City has collected money for the construction of the _ trails in other subdivisions such as Saddlebrook and Curry Farms for example. The current fee of $142.00 per lot is the fee which has been established at this time to fund the cost of trail/sidewalk construction. It is recommended that the trail fee that is in effect at the time of the issuance of a building permit be collected as part of the building permit fees. I have included the letter from Mel Kurvers date. October 31, 1988 for the Council's review (refer to Attachment No. 2) . It is therefore recommended that the established trail fees be collected for the Kurvers Point subdivision by the City at the time of issuance of a building per- mit. Attachments 1. Excerpt from Development Contract (Section 16) . 1 2. Letter from Mel Kurvers dated october 31, 1988. Manager's Comment: Mr. Kurvers' point regarding the additional 17 feet being dedicated to the City is not germane to the issue at hand. Specifically, all subdivisions along TH 101 have been required to dedicate additional right-of-way for potential roadway/ ditch improvements. A trail may be included in this additional right-of-way; but, again, such is not germane to the primary reason for obtaining the 17 feet. 4k;°/ 1 II Page 2 City staff is in agreement with Mr. Kurvers that he should be treated similar to ' other developers in having the City carry out the installation of the sidewalks/trails through his development. In light of the recent defeat of the trail referendum, it may be prudent for the Park and Recreation Commission to ' re-look at their Sidewalk/Trail Plan; i.e. total dollars may only be available to fund trail construction for major collectors, trails to and from schools, the downtown area, etc. As part of our recommendation, we are recommending that the City Council ask that the Park and Recreation Commission re-review their overall Trail Plan to determine whether sufficient dollars will exist for internal sidewalk/trails, or whether such monies should be dedicated to arterail/collector roadway trail systems. Regardless of whether a modifica- tion to the Trail Plan occurs or not, the staff recommendation to have the City carry out installation of the finally approved Trail Plan would be our respon- sibility. Approval of modifying the Development Contract to include a require- ' ment that the developer pay current trail fees on each building permit in lieu of carrying out trail construction is hereby recommended. clv I I 1 I 1 I lor materialmen are seeking payment out cf the financial guaran- ees posted with the City, and if the claims are not resolved at east sixt ( 6U )Y days before the security required by paragraph ,of this Contrct will expire, the Developer hereby authorizes e City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22 , Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125% of the II claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and II dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys fees pursuant to paragraph 25 of this Contract. II 15. Timber Management Plan. The Developer shall arrange for the preparation of a Timber Management Plan by the Department of Natural Resources Forester for this property, paying special II attention to the area on riparian lots within 75 feet of the high water mark. 16 . Trails and Trail Fees. The Developer shall grade I a trail along the Kurvers Point Road right-of-way to its connection with TH 101 . The Developer shall submit 0. plan for approval by the City Council prior to construction of the trail. II Compensation for installation of the trail shall be determined by the City Council at the time of Trail Plan approval. 18. Parkland Fees. Prior to the issuance per- mits for residential construction within the plat,bthe dDeveloper, its successors or assigns , shall pay to the City the parkland fee II then in force pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance and relevant City Council resolutions thereafter. 19. Landscaping. The Developer shall plant one (1) tree on II every lot in the plat that does not already have a tree in the front yard setback. The trees shall be selected from among the following species; varying the species within the subdivision: II Maples ( including Norway, "Schwedler" , and Sugar) Linden, American (Basswood) I Linden, Littleaf (and varieties "Greenspire" and "Redmond" ) Green Ash (and varieties "Marshalls" and "Summit" ) Honeylocust (and varieties "Imparial" , "Skyline" ,. and II Hacxberry Oak The minimum tree size shall be two inches caliper, either bare II root in season or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard. The Developer shall sod the drainage II swales . All trees , grass , and sod, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease tree at installation. All trees shall be warranted for 12 months after planting. 11 -5- I __ __ / Iu . II 7240 Kurvers Point Road �' '`��t�' gs �i '�-t Chanhassen , Minnesota 55317 Gi! �L�r ' October 31 , 1988 OCT 3 11983 a�,! ' Mr . Gary Warren , City Engineer �n y : is"B!'u�g Mayor and City Council � . City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen , Minnesota 55317 Gentlemen : ' Our development contract with the City of Chanhassen states , "The developer shall submit a plan for approval by the City Council prior to construction of the trail . Compensation will be determined by the City Council at the time of Trail Plan approval . " The developers of Kurvers Point intend to fully comply with the provisions of the development contract . As you are aware , we have ' been attempting to resolve this issue over the past 4 weeks and are confident that an agreement can be reached at the City Council meeting on November X, 1988 . ly In reviewing the sidewalk/trail issue , it is important to look at Kurvers Point both as a neighborhood within the context of the entire City of Chanhassen and as a housing development . When the ' development was in the review and approval process , we stated that a sidewalk was unnecessary due to large lot sizes and low anticipated traffic volumes . Additionally , we viewed the sidewalk ' as a problem in limiting the beach lot usage to residents only due to increased public access to the area. On the evening that the City Council granted final approval for ' Kurvers Point , a development known as Shadowmere was also on the agenda . When final action on Shadowmere occurred , no sidewalk or trail requirements were imposed on the development . This action was taken in spite of the fact that Shadowmere is a higher density development than Kurvers Point . This raises the question , why Kurvers Point is being treated differently? ' The developers of Kurvers Point support trails in the City of Chanhassen when they serve a valid public purpose . In support of this position , we dedicated an additional 17 feet of property along TH 101 to accommodate the eventual construction of a bituminous trail . All completed landscaping and berming improvements have been installed on private property , outside of the right-of-way 1 area . In dedicating the land along 101 for a trail , Kurvers Point provided the residents of the City of Chanhassen with the land needed for a trail consistent with the City ' s Trail Plan . The cost of this dedication was borne solely by the developers . Based upon the selling price of the lowest cost lots along 101 , this ' dedication amounts to approximately $56 ,000 . We feel that a 1 dedication of $56 ,000 substantiates our commitment to a community I wide trail network. The trail issue needs to be looked at also in a narrower scope focusing on Kurvers Point as a housing development . If a trail is II required by the City of Chanhassen , when should it be installed and how should it be financed? In previous correspondence and discussions with the City , we have stated that if a trail is ' required , it makes sense to install it at a later date for two primary reasons , one pertaining to physical installation and the second pertaining to financing. i Regarding installation , completion of the trail at a later date will prevent damage during home construction which will be occurring in the area . It will be beneficial to install the ' trail /sidewalk after the completion of phase two for overall continuity. Phase one , by itself , will start at 101 and end in the middle of the development . II In order to be up-front with buyers and to preserve the right of the City to install a sidewalk , Kurvers Point has clearly identified the trail in all purchase agreements . The agreement states , "Buyer and Seller acknowledge that the 10 feet of property fronting Kurvers Point Road is subject to possible future use as a walkway , under terms of a Developers Agreement between Seller and II the City of Chanhassen . " Pertaining to the financial aspects of the sidewalk/trail issue , I two concerns exist , initial cost and method of financing. In order for a sidewalk to be compatible with the $300 ,000 to $500 ,000 homes in Kurvers Point , it must be constructed of concrete . A five foot wide concrete walkway is expected to cost approximately $11 ,430 . 00 . II If the City waives the payment of trail fees for Kurvers Point in lieu of trail construction by the developers , an inequitable situation will exist . Trail fees from Kurvers Point will amount II to approximately $5265 .00 ( $135 . 00 X 39 lots ) . This amount is $6165 . 00 short of the sum needed to install the sidewalk . How will the developer be compensated for the additional expense? I The City of Chanhassen is now embarking on the installation of an overall trail plan which will hopefully be approved on November 8th . Installation of the Kurvers Point trail at the time of the II installation of some of the community trails by the same contractor should result in overall cost savings . Regardless of how the costs are assigned , they are an overall cost to taxpayers within the II entire community. Isn ' t it beneficial to install public improvements in the most economical manner possible? In summary , the developers of Kurvers Point ask that the City II Council consider the following issues in reaching a decision on the trail issue : 1 . The need for the interior trail /sidewalk is questionable . I Other developments approved during the same period of time have not II been required to include trails . ' 2 . Kurvers Point has demonstrated that it supports the community trail system through the dedication of land valued at approximately $56 ,000 . This dedication received no formal park credit from the ' City of Chanhassen . 3 . If a trail is to be installed , it should be accomplished in the future by the City of Chanhassen to avoid damage to the walkway during home construction and to simplify financing of the project . The City of Chanhassen can collect trail fees at the time of building permit issuance and install the concrete walkway as part of a larger , more cost effective improvement project . The developers of Kurvers Point have clearly communicated to all buyers that a sidewalk may be installed in the right-of-way area. ' The developers seek a fair and reasonable settlement of this issue. We respectively request that you consider the points ' reviewed in this letter in making your decision . Sincerely , Melvin Kurvers City Council Meeting - November 14, 1988 1.85 1 Councilman Johnson: This is a public hearing. You haven't called the public hearing to order yet if you want to technically do this right. ' Councilman Horn: It is called to order by recognizing the applicant. We haven't closed it. Acting Mayor Geving: We haven't closed the public hearing. comments. Pu g Is there any other Councilman Horn moved, Acting Mayor Geving seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The public hearing was closed. ' Resolution #88-122: Councilman Horn moved, Councilman Johnson seconded to approve vacating that portion of the utility easement as shown in Attachment 2, contingent upon receipt of a roadway, utility and drainage easement for the remaining 33 feet within the recognized Erie Avenue right-of-way. All voted in favor and the motion carried. II REVIEW KURVERS POINT TRAIL ISSUE. Larry Brown: At the present time, the City has established the current trail ' fee of $142.00 per lot. I referenced two subdivisions, Curry Farms and Saddlebrook for examples where we have collected those fees at the time of the building permit issuance. Staff is recommending that the Kurvers Point • Subdivision be handled in a similar manner. Acting Mayor Geving: Could you give us a little bit more meat than that please in terms of your conversations with the Kurvers and their comments regarding the easement along TH 101 and the amount that they've dedicated. I know that's a separate issue in fact but it does have some bearing on whether or not this Council would put in or remove from their contract an item that says in fact that the developer would pay for the sidewalks. Could you give us any comments there in regard to why are we singlely out the Kurvers, if we are, as opposed to these other developments where we have not asked for this? Is that true? ' Larry Brown: Don Ashworth, the City Manager has included his comments on that stating that we often request additional trail easements with other subdivisions if they were along TH 101 and we're treating the Kurver's subdivision the same . way. Acting Mayor Geving: How about on the internal trail? The sidewalk issue? ' Larry Brown: We are treating that similar to the subdivisions which I referenced Saddlebrook and Curry Farms so we feel that they are being treated the same way that we have current subdivisions. Acting Mayor Geving: In those cases were the developers requested to put in the sidewalks and the trails as opposed to building them as you go with a permit basis as being requested by the Kurvers? Are those trails in Saddlebrook excatly right now. 19 18( IIcity Council Meeting - November 14; 1988 Gary Warren: The Saddlebrook trail has been rough graded in and where we have ' existing homes, we have separately poured the sidewalk in those area so they could restore their properties. The Saddlebrook development contract does provide reimbursement to the developer in the amount of $14,900.00 for installation of trails. That his cost, his bid tab are higher than that by ' approximately $5,000.00 but also in Saddlebrook we had the transfer of park property, Kerber East as we call the park property. Some of that excess that he's paying...part of this transaction. For the most part he's been reimbursed ' for the trails. Acting Mayor Geving: From an engineering standpoint Gary, would you feel that it would be more desirable to put in the trails after the subdivision is built? When the homes are in and at that time go in and put in your sidewalks and trails rather than to have the developer put than in at the time the development is being built? Also, if these were a concrete sidewalk as the estimate that has been supplied here, reasonably accurate in terms of $11,200.00? Gary Warren: I think it's a conservatively high estimate. I don't think it's ' out of line but I think it's on the high side. In reference to your first question. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush I guess. That goes back to the Pleasant Hills trail issue. ..to a certain extent. If we have enough conditions where the Kurvers...putting in a purchase agreements...affected by ' the City, they are reserving the right to put in a trail along the property. That notice up front to perspective buyers I think is important and until we've had some confidence that that is really addressed by the home buyer issue ' ...we're going to have some sidewalks that are going to be damaged by builders that they're going to have to repair. ' Acting Mayor Geving: Who repairs those? Gary Warren: It would be the builder's responsibility. There are measures that they can take...to get in to protect the sidewalks. As long as they're aware ' and they know that we're watching, that it's their responsibility... Acting Mayor Geving: Okay, let's move on. I know Mel that you have discussed this with us before. Would you like to make a similar comment tonight since we're really going to address this tonight and hopefully resolve it once and for all. Would you like to restate your comments that you wrote in your letter? Mel Kurvers: I guess my only comment is that we still feel that the interior trails are not necessary. People interested in lots really feel the same way. I guess that's about what's stated in my letter. ' Acting Mayor Geving: I'd like to hear one, before we open it up for Council deliberation, I'd like to hear from Lori. From a Park and Rec standpoint, how ' you feel about developing these trails at this time in light of the fact that if you were to collect $142.00 times the number of units in this development, you would be approximately $5,000.00 short of the amount of money it would take to build this sidewalk or trail. In this case I guess it's going to be a sidewalk. ' Could you address that for us Lori? Where would this money come from that is the difference between the $142.00 trail fee and the actual cost of building the sidewalk? 20 City Council Meeting - November 14, 1988 187-11 Lori Sietsema: It would cane out of the trail development fund that we're establishing with the collection of those fees. I would like to make a comment that in light of the trail referendum failing, that we may want to send some of these things back to Park and Rec to priority. They may want to reprioritize different trail segments. Collect the fees for this developments but where they want the trail along TH 101 rather than concentrate on sidewalks. I'm not sure if that's the case but we aren't going to have the referendum monies to fund the whole trail system. There are certain some priorities out there that the Park and Recreation Commission may want to pursue. Acting Mayor Geving: That's a very good comment and I think it's germane to our discussion. Let's open it up for Council. Councilman Boyt: I think the issue that came in front of us was, could they do ' this one lot at a time. I don't have any trouble with them doing one lot at a time. Acting Mayor Gevin g: So as buildin g permits came in, they would pay their $142.00. It would go into a central fund and at some point the Park and Rec Commission would make a decision through their commission that we're going to - II put in Kurver's Point and put in a 5 foot or 6 foot sidewalk in there and take the funds out of the pool. Is that how you see it then Bill? At some future time this would happen. ' Councilman Boyt: I agree with Gary. If we don't put it in, I have a tendency to believe that it will never go in there. That's sort of a separate issue and the Park and Rec Department should deal with that. The Kurver's asked to have • this charged out one lot at a time. That's what we're doing in other developments and that's what we should do with them. Councilman Horn: I thought we agreed to that at least in principle the last time we talked about this. - Acting Mayor Geving: We more or less did. Councilman Horn: I firmly believe that people who are going to have a trail by their house need to be aware that it's there. I don't necessarily think you have to put concrete in there to inform them of that. I think there are other methods that can be used such as marking the trail or including it in their development contracts for each of the lots. Also, the comment that the perspective owners do not want interior trails was exactly the comment we heard from Near Mountain. Now the Near Mountain people are coming back and saying gee, we got ripped. We didn't get any sidewalks so I don't know that we can necessarily believe that. I think what we need is some, again I'll say this, consistent method of what we're going to do in the City. It seems we approach these things on a catch as catch can basis which I don't like. I think in terms of dedicating these and picking priorities, I don't think that's the way we should approach this at all. I think what we should be doing is have a plan in place that if the decision is made that we're going to have sidewalks, this is where we're going to have them and this is how they be placed. We do all our planning up front. Whether we have the money to put than in now to me is irrelevant. We should still go ahead with the full blown trail plan and allow space for that. If the money is available and the citizens decide yes, we do want sidewalks, then fine. Let's put them in. But let's not try to surprise ' 21 "`ify Council Meeting - November 14; 1988 ' everybody and figure out where they're going to go 10 years from now when the trail referendum passes, or whenever it is. I think that's something we have to plan for up front. Not only for sidewalks but all types of trail uses should [- I continue to be planned. That should be part of the overall plan. You can take an idealistic approach on where all this stuff should be. That doesn't mean we're always going to have the bucks to do them but at least a plan is in place ' and we know how it's going to work. I heard the argument said, we've got to wait to plan all this stuff until we find out if the referendum's approved. I don't agree with that. I think you plan for it first and get all the plans in place. Maybe if you've got the plans in place people get a better idea of what they're going to have and how they're going to have their money spent and you have a better chance of passing the trail referendum. But I think we should go ahead and reserve the space and whether it gets built or not, at least people know where it is. Acting Mayor Geving: May I ask you Mel, will there be space available on each ' of these lots so that Clark's idea here is the way we go, at some future time that sidewalk can be put in there in front of every one of those homes? There is space provided now in the lots is that correct? Mel Kurvers: It's in the... Acting Mayor Geving: It's in there and also you've indicated that in every ' sales agreement that would be firmly stated that there's a potential for a sidewalk in front of those homes. Councilman Horn: I think we can have them drawn in on the plat too. Acting Mayor Geving: I don't think there'd be does not? anYthxJ wrong with that... It ' Councilman Horn: Well, maybe we have something, we don't call it lat where show it. P ere we Frank Kurvers: I agree with Clark when he says we've got to plan. We got to get it resolved now and get some kind of a continuity for the trails but I guess what you're all talking about is the overall plan. I think the language that's ' in there... I don't like to see than get reassessed later on if it's there. Now we were dealing with people in good faith. If they know that they're possibly going to be there someday, that's all fine but we don't want a down the road say we're going to put it in and assess you people for that sidewalk or trail. Acting Mayor Geving: That's a very good point Frank. I think the biggest lack ' of faith in the City would come if a homeowner buyer buys your lot, pays the $142.00 fee and 5 years from now the Park and Rec Commission decides to put that in there and charges each of them another $200.00 to make up that $5,000.00 difference that I mentioned so we can pay for the sidewalk. I agree totally with you. That if the sidewalk is put in, it has to come out of the pool of the dedicated funds from the trail easements. Councilman Horn: Some are referendum. Acting Mayor Geving: Or whatever but not to go back against the homeowner. 22 189 ■ City Council Meeting - November 14, 1988 ■ Councilman Johnson: When we approved this development we fought on the trail issue and we came to the conclusion that the best way all around was for the ' developer to build the trails as part of it and that way, rather than the City putting in a standard asphalt trail, the developer preferred to put in a concrete trail or something. Now we're back to the point the developer doesn't want to put in a trail. He wants us to put in the trail. We're going to modify the development contract after we've approved it and now it's up to the City as to what goes in there. The developer has now lost control of what type of trail is put in there. We could put a woodchip trail in. He no longer has the control. As long as he realizes by modifying his own development contract that he's already agreed to, he's losing control then I have no problem with switching this in our current state. I think this gives the Park and Rec a little more flexibility as what to do with the monies from these fees. I don't see this particular development is going to fill up overnight. It might. I hope for the Kurvers it does but I have a feeling it's going to be a steadily growing development with, not brisk sales but some good sales in there. I think we'll see houses going in there all the time but I don't see it doing like a than Vista did and get 30 houses in 2 or 3 months. It may be a few years before we have all these fees came in. I have no problem with changing it if that's II what the developer wants. Acting Mayor Geving: If you feel that way, why don't you go ahead and make the motion Jay if you would to delete item 16 and modify it. Delete the existing development contract provision 16 and modify it with new words if you would. I think 16 has got to come out of here in terms of trails and trail fees. Just delete it entirely and then we'll rework it. ' Councilman Horn: I don't know that we're going to do that. Acting Mayor Geving: Well, that's the point that I'm making. I think tonight we need to identify exactly what we're going to do and as far as I'm concerned, based on what I've heard from the rest of the Council members, we're all willing -- to go along and modify the existing development contract by deleting item 16. Item 16 is the trail and trail fees which indicates currently that the developer will pay. They'll submit the plans and the build the construction of this trail. My idea is to pull this out. To omit it entirely changing the words in item 16 modifying the development contract to include a requirement that the trail fees will be collected at the time that each building permit is issued. That the other provision that there would be no future assessment to the homeowner. If a trail is built at any time in the future, funds would be derived from the trail funds that have been previously collected and it would be a decision of the Park and Rec Commission whether or not the trail would be proposed. And to carry it one step further, we've all talked about this. There would be public hearings with those homeowners before the trail would actually be installed. Councilman Boyt: I would speak against that. I know it's not a motion yet but I don't think that this Council wants to tie the arms of any future Council in how they would approach this trail issue. We're in no position to guarantee anybody in this town how sidewalks are going to be built in front of their house. 1 23 ' W() IIa City Council Meeting - November 14; 1988 Acting Mayor Geving: Bill, what I'm trying to propose here is that we delete the existing item 16 which says that the developer will submit the plans and develop the sidewalks. Okay, we'll delete that let's start over then with building a new item 16 which says in effect that we will collect the fees at the time the building permits are issued. They will be put into the trail pool and we don't need to really say anymore than that except I personally would like to build into the wordage here for all time that no future assessment for the construction of these trails in Kurvers Point Road would be placed against the homeowners. Now that's the motion I would like to place before the Council. Councilman Horn: I think that could always be changed by any future Council. Legally we can't tie. .. Acting Mayor Geving: I know but it's the intent. Councilman Horn: You can say that's our intent. ' Acting Mayor Geving: You have to always look at where we're at tonight. position is that the intent of this Council is to do just what we stated. To ' remove the item that's in there now and put back another provision and that was the motion that I'm going to propose to the Council. ' Councilman Johnson: I think what I'd like to see is our City Attorney or somebody draw up a new item 16 for us to have the exact reading. This is a contract we're talking here. It's not a simple condition or anything. It's a legal binding document that we're modifying here. I think I would like to see ' before we do exactly the final vote, I would like to see the exact wording of what I'm approving. II Acting Mayor Geving: I have no problem with that Jay. I really have no problem with that. Councilman Johnson: So what I'd like to see is that this come back to us with whatever conditions. I think one of the conditions that would be part of number 16 is that all homeowners are notified that a trail is planned through the front of their property as part of the overall city trail system. Not that it may or ' it might but it is planned. This is a walk through, pass through neighborhood connecting eventually to two different segments of the trail system. Councilman Horn: I'd also like to include the option in there. I think this can be somewhat of a general development contract that each builder has the option of paying them on a permit by permit basis at the current fee at that time or if they choose they can pay than all off at the existing rate. What ' that does, if you do have a development that may take several years to develop and everybody knows the trail fees keep going up, you can lock in at a fixed rate. Councilman Johnson: So the Kurvers could pay now. Acting Mayor Geving: Bill, do you have any items you want to add? We're up to four now. Councilman Boyt: What I would suggest, I think this is fairly simple although [:: we keep attaching leaves to it. The developer provide the standard trail 24 . . 191 City Council Meeting - November 14, 1988 II 17, - easement along Kurvers Point Road right-of-way to it's connection through TH 101 and so notify any and all property holders. That the developer pay the trail fees in effect at the time of the building permit or be able to pay the fees in II effect at the time of building permit with the provision that the fees may be paid at any one time in a lump sum. Acting Mayor Geving: That's 2. 11 Councilman Boyt: I think that covers 3 and 4. _ I Acting Mayor Geving: Roger, do you have any questions about what our intent is? Roger Knutson: No. _ II Acting Mayor Geving: Okay, you could build item 16 around that? Any other comments? I think we're fairly clear. I Frank Kurvers: The wording should say builder instead of developer. Acting Mayor Geving: I had a problem with that too Frank. That it should be I builder because once you develop this, you guys are going to be gone and a builder will be in there applying for the building permits. I agree it should . be builder and I'm sure Roger would have put that in but that's a good point. II Any other comments from the Council? Councilman Johnson: Was Bill's a motion? II Councilman Boyt: I'm alright with having him write it up, that's fine. Acting Mayor Geving: If you want to make the motion to do that. Bill I think I your comments were okay. Councilman Boyt: I would move with the change of the word builder and developer I as I previously stated. Acting Mayor Geving: Okay, and direct Roger to prepare the appropriate wordage II for consideration on the 28th. Councilman Horn: I'll second that. II Councilman Boyt moved, Councilman Horn seconded to table action on the Kurvers Point Trail issue until the next meeting and direct the City Attorney to delete II item 16 and reword a new item 16. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Stuart Warren: I'm one of the new owners who will live in that area. There are II several lots sold. I have one of them. I think I speak for all three so far that we would just as soon pass on having the trails put in at all. If not, I'd kind of like, I heard you say a public hearing with the homeowners. II Acting Mayor Geving: That would be done. I'm quite confident that the future Council will give you that opportunity. II 25 II 1 . LAW OFFICES GRANNIS, GRANNIS, FARRELL & KNUTSON DAVID L. GRANNIS- 1874-1961 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION TELECOPIER. 1 DAVID L. GRANNIS,JR.- 1910-1980 POST OFFICE BOX 57 (612)455-2359 VANCE B.GRANNIS 403 NORWEST BANK BUILDING ELLIOTT B.KNETSCH VANCE B. GRANNIS,JR. 161 NORTH CONCORD EXCHANGE MICHAEL J. MAYER PATRICK A. FARRELL TIMOTHY J BERG ' DAVID L. GRANNIS,III ROGER N.KNUTSON SOUTH ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075 TELEPHONE(612)455-1661 DAVID L. HARMEYER November 22, 1988 Mr. Larry Brown Chanhassen City Hall 690 Coulter Drive, Box 147 ' Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 RE: Kurvers Point Development Contract 1 Dear Larry: 1 Enclosed is the revised language the City Council requested concerning trails and trail fees. V- • yours, 1 GR, NIS, G: -NNIS, FARRELL • 1 BY. Roger N. Knutson RNK:srn 1 Enclosure 1 1 1 1 NOV 2 ,3 1988 iCITY OF CHANHASSEN 1 40e, 1 16. Trails and Trail Fees. In the future the City may construct a trail in the plat along the Kurvers Point Road right-of-way to its connection with TH 101. The Developer shall inform, in writing, each lot buyer of this planned trail construction. Before a building permit is issued for a lot, a trail fee shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule that exists at that time. The trail fee, however, may be prepaid at any time in accordance with the fee schedule that exists at the time of payment. ' 1