PC Staff Report 05-20-2014PROPOSED MOTION:
"The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a Site Plan for
construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion, subject to the conditions of approval; and
adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation."
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Site Plan Review approval for the
construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion (Next Steps Learning Center). Notice of
this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is
recommending approval of the request with conditions.
LOCATION: 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park)
APPLICANT: Next Steps Learning Center
1430 Park Court
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Mr. Jeremy Spaude
Phone: 612 -501 -1493
Jeremy- nslc@yahoo.com
PRESENT ZONING: IOP, Industrial Office Park
2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office /Industrial
ACREAGE: 2.2 Acres 96,010 square feet
DENSITY: N/A
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the
proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the
City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
Planning Commission
Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15
May 20, 2014
Page 2
PROPOSAL /SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting a site plan
review for the expansion of an existing
daycare center. The site is zoned IOP,
Industrial Office Park and bordered by
Highway 5 to the north, office buildings
to the east and southeast and Riley Creek
to the west. The lot area of the daycare
site is 2.2 acres and gains access off of
Park Court.
The site plan is for a 3,000 square -foot
addition that will be added along the
southwest portion of the building.
Materials used on the addition will be
identical to those used on the original
building: Decorative Concrete Masonry
Unit (CMU) with a strip of smooth
accent CMU, and windows.
The existing playground is located along the north portion of the existing building and is not
proposed to change. Parking is located along the south and east portions of the lot. The
southerly parking area will be reconfigured and new spaces will be added to accommodate the
addition.
Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. Based upon the foregoing, staff is
recommending approval of the site plan, with conditions outlined in the staff report.
BACKGROUND
On October 24, 1988, the City
Council approved a conditional use
permit with a variance to allow the
construction of a 6,700 square -foot
daycare center with a variance for a
parking setback.
Planning Commission
Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15
May 20, 2014
Page 3
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review
GENERAL SITE PLAN /ARCHITECTURE
The proposed 3,000 square -foot
daycare building addition will
be situated northwest of the
existing building. With this
addition, the total building area
will be 9,700 square feet. The
site is zoned IOP, Industrial
Office Park and bordered by
Highway 5 to the north, office
buildings to the east and
southeast and Riley Creek to the
west. The lot area of the
daycare site is 2.2 acres.
The site is within the shoreland
district for Riley Creek. The
proposed improvements are 70
feet from the centerline of Riley
Exislmg
Building
Proposed .
Addition
o2
- ->-
�� ART
Creek at its nearest point. This
is compliant with the required 50 -foot setback. There is at least 50 feet of wooded land adjacent
to Riley Creek acting as a buffer.
The addition is fairly straightforward. Access is gained from Park Road. Existing parking is
located to the east and south of the site. The parking will be reconfigured to allow for the
addition and add two parking spaces. Existing playground area is located along the northeast
portion of the building.
The applicant is proposing to utilize the same
materials as the existing building consisting of
decorative Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) with a
strip of smooth accent CMU, and windows. The
accent band was painted and the applicant will match
that color. Windows are also used to add an
architectural interest.
The addition including the existing building is
located 60.6 feet from the north, 63 feet from the east, and 50 feet from the southwest property
line. Site coverage may not exceed 70 percent. The total hard surface coverage proposed on the
site is 33.49 %.
Planning Commission
Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15
May 20, 2014
Page 4
ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE
The proposed addition will match the existing building. The colors and materials will be
identical to the existing building. The fagade of the addition viewed by the public contains 50
percent windows and/or doors.
LIGHTING /SIGNAGE
The applicant prepared a lighting photometrics plan. Light levels for site lighting shall be no
more than one -half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to
street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90- degree angle
as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded.
The applicant has not shown any signs on the site plan. There are existing wall and monument
signs on the site. Any modification in signage must comply with the sign ordinance and will
require a sign permit.
PARKING
The ordinance requires one parking space per six students. The building capacity is 119 students
which translates to 20 parking spaces. The applicant is providing 28 parking spaces.
ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE
Size, Portion and Placement
Entries: The building has a pronounced entrance.
Articulation: The building incorporates adequate detail and has been tastefully designed. The
architectural style is unique to the building but will fit in with the surrounding area. The building
utilizes exterior materials that are durable and of high quality.
Signs: All signage must meet the sign ordinance.
Material and Detail
High quality materials are being used on the building.
Color
The colors chosen for the building are earth tones. The selection is unique, but blends in with the
surrounding buildings.
Planning Commission
Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15
May 20, 2014
Page 5
Height and Roof Desian
The maximum building height permitted is three stories. The building meets the ordinance
requirement. The roofline is staggered, adding articulation to the design of the building. The
ordinance requires a pitched element on the building. A pitched element is located above the
entrance into the building. All rooftop equipment must be screened from views.
Facade Transparency
The southeast fagade is the only one that will be modified by this addition and it contains more
than 50 percent windows and/or doors.
k MAMW
[GSJM�_M
u.TM�I L,T'fiR
MW GThi
Loading Areas, Refuse Areas. etc.
The existing trash enclosure is located northeast of the existing building. No changes are
proposed.
SITE PLAN FINDINGS
In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance
with the following:
(1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides,
including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that
may be adopted;
(2) Consistency with this division;
(3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing
tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the
general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas;
(4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site
features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the
development;
Planning Commission
Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15
May 20, 2014
Page 6
(5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with
special attention to the following:
a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and
provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general
community;
b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping;
C. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of
the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and
neighboring structures and uses; and
d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives
and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public
streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior
circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement
and amount of parking.
(6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision
for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light
and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations
which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses.
Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the design requirements, the
comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and the site plan review requirements. The
site design is compatible with the surrounding development and the existing building. It
is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area.
Planning Commission
Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15
May 20, 2014
Page 7
COMPLIANCE TABLE
WETLANDS, BLUFFS AND SHORELAND
Based upon a review of aerial photography, soils data, the National Wetland Inventory maps, the
City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wetland
Inventory, there is no evidence of any wetland features on site. Further, while there are steep
slopes immediately adjacent to the site, they do not meet the definition of bluff.
The site is within the shoreland district for Riley Creek. The proposed improvements are 70 feet
from the centerline of Riley Creek at its nearest point. This is compliant with the required 50-
foot setback. There is at least 50 feet of wooded land adjacent to Riley Creek acting as a buffer.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
The existing site drains water runoff in two directions. The runoff from the building, half of the
west parking lot and the west half of the property all drain over the surface of the ground to Riley
Creek. The existing spillway into Riley Creek has experienced erosion and is in a state of
deterioration. The water runoff from the east half of the property, including most of the
pavement surface, drains to Park Court to be picked up by the municipal storm sewer system.
Ordinance Requirements (IOP)
Proposed
Lot
Area
1 acres
2.2 acres
Frontage
150 feet
328 feet
Depth
200 feet
471 feet
Lot Coverage
70%
33.49%
Building Height
Principal
our stories (50 feet)
one story (21 feet)
Accessory
one story
NA
Building Setbacks
Front yard
30 feet
Approx. 60 feet
Rear yard
10 feet
Approx. 65 feet
Side yard
10 feet
Approx. 170 feet
Riley Creek
50 feet
75 feet
Parking Requirements
Stalls
1/6 space per student--20
28
WETLANDS, BLUFFS AND SHORELAND
Based upon a review of aerial photography, soils data, the National Wetland Inventory maps, the
City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wetland
Inventory, there is no evidence of any wetland features on site. Further, while there are steep
slopes immediately adjacent to the site, they do not meet the definition of bluff.
The site is within the shoreland district for Riley Creek. The proposed improvements are 70 feet
from the centerline of Riley Creek at its nearest point. This is compliant with the required 50-
foot setback. There is at least 50 feet of wooded land adjacent to Riley Creek acting as a buffer.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
The existing site drains water runoff in two directions. The runoff from the building, half of the
west parking lot and the west half of the property all drain over the surface of the ground to Riley
Creek. The existing spillway into Riley Creek has experienced erosion and is in a state of
deterioration. The water runoff from the east half of the property, including most of the
pavement surface, drains to Park Court to be picked up by the municipal storm sewer system.
Planning Commission
Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15
May 20, 2014
Page 8
The applicant is proposing to install a dry pond to address the runoff and erosion issues along the
slope of Riley Creek. This proposed practice will reduce rates to the steep slope area and will
provide some water quality benefit and volume reduction. The outlet for the dry pond will have
a rip rap slope constructed to provide energy dissipation. This area should be shown on the
overall grading plan and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to
accommodate this disturbance.
The plan calls for the use of a portion of the west parking lot and drop -off area as storage for the
larger rain events. Water may pool to a depth of one -half foot. It appears that it may be possible
to reduce, although not eliminate, this pooling depth and area by installing a curb cut emergency
overflow in the southwest corner of the parking lot.
A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required.
The scale on the grading plans must be corrected.
The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the corners of the proposed structure.
The plan shall be revised to show locations of any proposed stockpile areas.
The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1.
EASEMENTS
A 10 -foot drainage and utility easement runs along the north, east and southeast property lines,
whereas a 5 -foot drainage and utility easement runs along the rest of the property's borders
191.1 14'i `IaOI SIYI
Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid
in the stormwater management of the property. Per City Code §20 -1118, 60° angled parking
spaces have a minimum dimension of 9' x 18' spaces and 18.5' aisle widths. The City Code
contains a figure to illustrate the required dimensions.
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
Because the proposed plan will result in less than one acre of new impervious, it will not require
a General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity
Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program
(NPDES Construction Permit). The plan must comply with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City
code.
Planning Commission
Bluff Creek Cottages — Planning Case 2013 -8
July 16, 2013
Page 9 of 10
LANDSCAPING
Minimum requirements for landscaping at Next Step Learning Center include 873 square feet of
landscaped area around the parking lot, one landscape island or peninsula, three trees for the
parking lot. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and
parking lot trees is shown in the following table.
Applicant does not meet minimum requirements for trees. The applicant shall include a total of
three trees.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the site plan for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare
addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of
approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation:
Environmental Resources Conditions
1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and/or within the parking lot.
Engineering Conditions
1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and
area.
2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required.
3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected.
4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the corners of the proposed structure.
5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas.
6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1.
7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and
aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20 -1118.
8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of
Chanhassen City Code.
Re uired
Proposed
Vehicular use landscape area
873 s . ft.
>873 s . ft.
Trees/ parking lot
3 trees
1 trees
Islands or peninsulas/ parking lot
1 island/ eninsula
1 island/ peninsula
Applicant does not meet minimum requirements for trees. The applicant shall include a total of
three trees.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the site plan for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare
addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of
approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation:
Environmental Resources Conditions
1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and/or within the parking lot.
Engineering Conditions
1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and
area.
2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required.
3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected.
4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the corners of the proposed structure.
5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas.
6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1.
7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and
aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20 -1118.
8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of
Chanhassen City Code.
Planning Commission
Bluff Creek Cottages — Planning Case 2013 -8
July 16, 2013
Page 10 of 10
9. The applicant must procure and comply with all required approvals from applicable
jurisdictional agencies.
10. The rip rap slope must be shown on the plans and erosion prevention and sediment control
practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance.
Building Official Conditions
1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system.
2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of
Minnesota.
3. Detailed occupancy and building area - related code requirements cannot be reviewed until
further information is provided.
4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as
possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures.
Planning Conditions
1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views.
2. Any new signs must comply with the sign ordinance requirements.
3. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one -half foot candle at the project
perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be
downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90- degree angle as required by the city code. All
fixtures shall be shielded.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
2. Development Review Application.
3. Reduced Copy of Plans dated "Received April 18, 2014 ".
4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing.
g: \plan\2014 planning cases\2014 -15 next steps learning center expansion\staff report.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND RECOMMENDATION
IN RE: Application of Next Steps Learning Center for a Site Plan Review for the
Construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion — Planning Case No. 2014 -15
On May 20, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting
to consider the application of Next Steps Learning Center for a Site Plan request for the
construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare center addition for property located at 1430 Park Court
(Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the
proposed site plan preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard
testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park.
2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan Office /Industrial.
3. The legal description of the property is Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park.
4. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's
compliance with the following:
a. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including
the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted;
b. Consistency with this division;
c. Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and
soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance
of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas;
d. Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site
features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the
development;
e. Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special
attention to the following:
1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a
desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community;
2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping;
Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design
concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures
and uses; and
4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking
in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of
interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian
and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking.
f. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for
surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and
those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have
substantial effects on neighboring land uses.
5. The planning report #2014 -15, dated May 20, 2014, prepared by Sharmeen Al -Jaff, et al, is
incorporated herein.
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20th day of May 2014.
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
ON
Its Chairman
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECEIVED — 7700 Marke Boulevard
Mailing Address- P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 APR 18 ZO CITY OF CHMNSEN
Phone: (952) 227 -1300 / Fax: (952) 227 -1110
CIIINK4MRAM6N8111"
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Date Filed: A— i3_t 60 -Day Review Deadline: Planner: SETS Case #: _Is
Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply)
❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600
❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ...... $100
❑ Conditional Use Permit
❑ Single - Family Residence ...... ...........................$325
❑ All Others .............................. ...........................$425
❑ Interim Use Permit
❑ In conjunction with Single - Family Residence..$325
❑ All Others .............................. ...........................$425
❑ Grading z 1,000 cubic yards ........................... UBC
❑ Rezoning
❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) ...................$750
❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100
❑ All Others .............................. ...........................$500
❑ Sign Plan Review.........
.......... $150
❑ Subdivision
Site Plan Review El Zoning Appeal ........................... ...........................$100
!!! ��` Administrative ....................... ...........................$100
Commercial /Industrial Districts* ......................$500 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500
Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area —(3c) NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently,
Include number of existing employees:
and number of new employees: ` the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
�
❑ Residential Districts ...... ............................... $500 (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal
Plus $5 per dwelling unit information that must accompany this application)
ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES:.r�
Notification Sign .................... ............................... $200 TOTAL FEES: $ �frvlel�
(City to install and remove) N =x.}.- LeayYM
Property Owners' List within 500'......... $3 per addreh 3 1 Y Received from: J
(City to generate — fee determined at pr lication meeting)
Escrow for Recording Documents .$50%per document �� Date Received: l Check Number: iPt o �.
(CUP /SPRNACNARNVAP /Metes & s Subdivision)
Section 2: Required In7ormation
�p L S1+12-05, Project Name: _lam ('COI _ P�_yiJun C r 0 r
Property Address or Location: Lt"
Parcel 0 a O Legal Description: L-p4- V Vic
Total Acreage: . Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes No
Present Zoning: t.�1 ,,QgrZ -0 . �jrK
Present Land Use Designation: ?a Jm Lsdc ^ )
Existing Use of Property:
Description of Proposal:.
Requested Zoning: _
Requested Land Use Designation: m-e -
❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached
E.
❑
Create 3 lots or less .............. ...........................$300
❑
Create over 3 lots ......................
$600 + $15 per lot
❑
Metes & Bounds .......................
$300 + $50 per lot
❑
Consolidate Lots ................... ...........................$150
❑
Lot Line Adjustment ............. ...........................$150
❑
Final Plat* ............................. ...........................$250
*Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs.
Escrow will be required for other applications through the
development contract.
❑
Vacation of Easements / Right- of- way
...................$300
(Additional recording fees may apply)
❑
Variance ................................ ...............................
$200
❑
Wetland Alteration Permit
❑
Single - Family Residence .... ...........................$150
❑
All Others ........................ ...............................
$275
Site Plan Review El Zoning Appeal ........................... ...........................$100
!!! ��` Administrative ....................... ...........................$100
Commercial /Industrial Districts* ......................$500 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500
Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area —(3c) NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently,
Include number of existing employees:
and number of new employees: ` the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
�
❑ Residential Districts ...... ............................... $500 (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal
Plus $5 per dwelling unit information that must accompany this application)
ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES:.r�
Notification Sign .................... ............................... $200 TOTAL FEES: $ �frvlel�
(City to install and remove) N =x.}.- LeayYM
Property Owners' List within 500'......... $3 per addreh 3 1 Y Received from: J
(City to generate — fee determined at pr lication meeting)
Escrow for Recording Documents .$50%per document �� Date Received: l Check Number: iPt o �.
(CUP /SPRNACNARNVAP /Metes & s Subdivision)
Section 2: Required In7ormation
�p L S1+12-05, Project Name: _lam ('COI _ P�_yiJun C r 0 r
Property Address or Location: Lt"
Parcel 0 a O Legal Description: L-p4- V Vic
Total Acreage: . Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes No
Present Zoning: t.�1 ,,QgrZ -0 . �jrK
Present Land Use Designation: ?a Jm Lsdc ^ )
Existing Use of Property:
Description of Proposal:.
Requested Zoning: _
Requested Land Use Designation: m-e -
❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached
E.
Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information
APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained
authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to
the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by
the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application
should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this
application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application.
further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to
any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name
Address:
City /State /Zip:
Email:
Signature: _
Contact
Phone:
Cell:
Fax:
Date:
PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do,
authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those
conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of
the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may
be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the
study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: �f
Address: I
City /State /Zip:
Email:
Signati
5' -
Contact: Sys
Phone:
Cell: (I2--5oi 3
Fax:
Date:
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all
information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the
appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and
applicable procedural requirements.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A
written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable)
Name:
Addres
City /St:
Contact:
Phone:
Cell:
Email: 4 U (- �[y P -enci Fax:
Who should receive copies of staff reports?
Property Owner Via: ®'Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy
❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy
Engineer Via: I&Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy
Other* Via: Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy
*Other Contact Information:
Name: s ); vh 14cvszQc
Address:
City / State /Zip: o
Email: Fr/. ^&I-
\\ _- y , fi
NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER EXPANSION
(hip L }i
r6y � /ix
L0 0.pPE0.TT 2 B ock 1 O. N IPAON
CK PPAM <uerEFq 1e 16e rtcatletl plot r6ueol Corm Gwnry Nnnml,
PROPERTY ANDEASS
]0 MI It
CRm�ossen. NN EE31]
NEI
1. UIIIFg Inpo^r GGR elewlim[INDERa o0y ;emi, LREd E...A
2 q<N<ua AN, e<I1E / BB.c rI r by R<xtlw - Wwxel. .Plies le m
<r Et", M< WA Cwrw Rt 651- aE0 -U0 2 G
i N <I «w 6ergr<1Rl e6 m<aals p5xo< 5 11EN, 1EDIRRI
DIN, Ad —.E le Ex r ur<gNe1M nil yWG<d«
SHEET INDEX
Gt ontl CroI PM
3 01'
] P <awro on
{
AD
SCALE IN FE�T
\
\
\
\
NLy�
TZA1�T�
ErtIGNAMINNIN.
s EAA..P "REE
eE
p s.R �o
.ags
'
L
A,
M
i u
�IC
NSIIxC
PPAKIN6pLOT
SECfIpX.
6
E.
3 i
F a
/
¢ /
R A,
P
EI
���3 �
i••
_
� 'Y.
P
aF "
��•�n�
t
/� //R
� V�i
0
A
'
DRAINAGE MR"
RIDGE DRAINAGE
aVy' S � � 1 ��
✓+1
A.
DIG
/ 1
' s
RE
it
F..
I \S' ,
✓ /J/
�'1
//
��,*y
HNOIKMK
INGE M EN, uo MGM G
DEN EI V. II N. 00)
I
\
1 K \
®>
N
/
L0 0.pPE0.TT 2 B ock 1 O. N IPAON
CK PPAM <uerEFq 1e 16e rtcatletl plot r6ueol Corm Gwnry Nnnml,
PROPERTY ANDEASS
]0 MI It
CRm�ossen. NN EE31]
NEI
1. UIIIFg Inpo^r GGR elewlim[INDERa o0y ;emi, LREd E...A
2 q<N<ua AN, e<I1E / BB.c rI r by R<xtlw - Wwxel. .Plies le m
<r Et", M< WA Cwrw Rt 651- aE0 -U0 2 G
i N <I «w 6ergr<1Rl e6 m<aals p5xo< 5 11EN, 1EDIRRI
DIN, Ad —.E le Ex r ur<gNe1M nil yWG<d«
SHEET INDEX
Gt ontl CroI PM
3 01'
] P <awro on
{
AD
SCALE IN FE�T
\
\
\
\
NLy�
TZA1�T�
ErtIGNAMINNIN.
s EAA..P "REE
eE
p s.R �o
.ags
'
L
A,
M
i u
�IC
NSIIxC
PPAKIN6pLOT
SECfIpX.
6
E.
3 i
LEGEN.
4 4
V
GAIRDENT
7.
DRAINAGE MR"
RIDGE DRAINAGE
—
El EMMET
HNOIKMK
INGE M EN, uo MGM G
DEN EI V. II N. 00)
®>
N
e
fcb
.
'D ,�+
FERN LEAR
—MS—
PAWECTx6
I mxwn[xnor¢
1901
-. >.._..
PARK
COURT
EE REM pN
P
E
SxEE15
c'n,0FCHANr)AS Ee
REMN ED
APR '18 2014
CHANHASSEm PLANNING DF "Y SCANNED
�.��; OFCHANHASSH�:
gECEIVED SCANNW
APR "1 6 2014
04410AAMENKANNIN4OR I
EngtrWRODing
\T
L
nls ae �D
tE NyI
(1'1 -9'PVL 00yh\ �
\ ANN �99.D
B¢�Xi G8
\'sEE�e�14 N \ x�rp�
xne5 B
;cdNiRETE FLUME
\ \ WOE
T yr L�
\ T •,\ T
EnsnND mono
� ^
`
I
oar PWO Ea�
a :.e
\ T
D .D 30
GWLE IN PEST
!I
-.UL, rAF.O mE Iv
g
\ \
�i
I \\ \ \
ws* e[ xuu Pump
DO ACWEK BEARER 311W
g p
\ \\ \
d�
DRY POND
RIPRAP SLOPE DETAIL
R
e �
BmN-
EOU SLOPES INNEFIA l W'. EIAL ORABINO - TON OF FIRO 950.B
_
I.. EOD DO CREEK SIBE OF BERN- A\
\ SECFEE INLET
-IW 969.R
ROOEINV GUARD Pt Pi ONF
NIXINON RIPRM ER S T PVC W ..E. PM
VC
J UNDER <' PMORY MO KGETARON
j
PREVENTION AI INLET.
XIEN CNINII µLL RE PRUNE TO ..DO INLETS SHOUIO BE PROTECTED
1 MON LEA O RWRENM.
'
- Y . PX FM AL WLV 1. WOE NE91 MFN I/T WEXMCS ON .15 AND lm
- CAN BE PLACED AROUND ENRRE INLET FOR RCOENT µD CLOMING PRRUBCRON.
p
R1909No
1-OJ \ _ RIPRAP AWE
` -R:-
15' BEPIN
H RIPRAP CL. II OvR
SHEET
6EOlE%nLE fAmlG ME IV
.(
z
MTFND TO OR W aroE DRY POND OUTLET DETAIL
OF
3
NEE.
�.��; OFCHANHASSH�:
gECEIVED SCANNW
APR "1 6 2014
04410AAMENKANNIN4OR I
F
II \ I
\ 11
\ L
1 \ 1
\ \ r
/
/
/
l�.
�95eJ� -0pI
4
1 V� A A
I RM \\ V AA,
\ 2
!r 1
..
I
1 \�
I
\
/
/ro 0
iINVENTORY -P
�
96 gaCm9 a V Nn..
oroe Ireeeal ' orea
20 40
TREE REPRAD LI
r... wa A,4 AIR, =.'v e< m ne M—R. A mm If (7) +.morlee xwi Wil x 1-1d
EAMDg b,d, M rv, I
.. ee.ee 4 wee veM w I same -E a wee ... RE en. e� "I a.M
Ee pane n f. p-0, 1.11 enMw e. N erwa ne pe rvi Ce grins eCeM1 rwm mu v
TREE REPIAEEMERR
REPLACEMENT TRES 6F/A06I O
SVG.R All 25E I.
Q RRVes
/ \\ e
i
iw1 EM�K 951.61 (xnw ea)
PARK ,
" s COURT
LEGEND -
IA 4T
EX HDRANT -6 i—
n ®o
—ER IDA
SMT FEAR..
L" RMRPR�PRNA
,aII al.N,e,
OFL AANOASEiEt'
RECEIb`Ef7)
APR ? 6 2014
0941 IASSEM PLANNING OPPi
KALLIO
E111 PARN 1
rs 11
1404
EE2
OF
3
9HEEiE
'T
�a r —= - - - - --
,Lr oroh °9eiN<LItvE °..me�x� - -�
-- - - -
- -= ------ - - - -_-
7�/
h
30' 60'
Next Center
o Court
14Chanhassen,
7
Hard Cover Calculations:
9s.om :e. ca / z.z6 nrrr.
.g \
'^ \ o
/ i ,/ /
J/
caseme smmma zoos :a. n.
al,a V`t.'S rf.— z�sss :'v: i`a
14 /
'i_ eetlsMa� rzo
r
.ry ' fl.
51' s ° f
iotnl or p 1, p sa It
\ o \
Nartl Cor % 32I9 %
rGLpN4�cxn R9t!
m
�g2y9 \ \
\ f'f'
9"
(k,
MN ERP SITE NOTES
I \
\
\
\
N
\ \ e xw meua� rrmixo smmw
iewmnrs
\
\ \ a wax Zr- ixisMr rossm[�
�'°ri ui�mwx
ixxpirs mmr
of
CITYOFCHANHASSEV
' " °" cover
°i.;
RECEIVED
/
APR 'I 6 2014
CHAN14ASSEN PLANNING "'IT
— -- 328.40' (plat) �f
_ _
/
I� 28.0
\ II - v A:A 6• / v
r7 ul"
qie y V"
00 /
VA/ 2 /
X
na k
nil
Next Steps Learning Center
1430 Park Court
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Hard Cover Calculatlons�
Lot Szel 96,010 sq, ft / 2.20 Acres
Ex st nq a ld g >oes sq. n.
] stng Canopy 222 sq tt.
Elilt,n, Bt S f cep 21,556 sq, ft.
Exist Core S'tl lb 1,984 sq.ft
E ,st. Storage Shed 120 sq. ft.
(7' \ 0' z E Prop. Bur, Net Gan 512 sq. Pt.
Total Hard cover q. 31,479 s ft.
Hard Co / 32,79
44 q 2 s rti
a? P
69
I n \',r / SS's
GincWCHANHASSEP! I x1, //2 ��l Flsrr�C
RECEIVED \ `
\.r s
APR 'i 2014 i
GHAIIlHASSEN PLANNING nFpw
�- aenchnuro
Top nut F Fire hydrant
Elem = 95161
PARK COURT
OITYOFCHANHASS&
RECEIVED
APR 18 2014
cHMNAMEN RANNING wr
J -
M�MMWWWMW
1-mm
Elmer
J -
viry RECEIVE) E0
APR 1 8 2014
CNANHASUN PLANNING DEPT
-� - �IT m
d 2
■
:�o va 3�II
gs�
Ilk
,58
T
F
6
U
S �
.ust .3113
6/�q
Existing Conditions Survey /Proposed Improvements
— for — Next Steps Learning Center
Property Address:
1430 Park Court
Chanhassen, MN 55317
GescHption of Preperty Surveyed:
Lot 2. Block 1, ROME PARK, according to the recorded
plat thereof,, Carver County, Minnesota.
Hard Cover Caleulatlon8:
LM ste: SSRL1 l,ft12.30A—.
&INNIS autlCrry. ;n85 5q, ft.
EIANS, C., 2225p. ft.
F.eL,L 6Y SII.. 21.558 sC X.
IRRI. C. —Sltl—. 1,984 ap.ft
E—L .NA S'.d: 1211, ft
Pep AGS -Nul n.,: 418 N. A.
Prop. P&SAAK, - Net Gein: 802 IA. ft
TKIK HRe c.— 32,187 Sq. It
HaN Co — %, 3,4S
Parking
E+rsnng PNANA Stel, 26
P.KNNd P..A.. 1e
NO Gem.
REVISED OU27114 - HARD SURFACE CALCULATIONS
AGVGS7G0I,2VN( PROPOSED PARKING LOT
REVISED. 01/24M4 - PROPOSED PARKING LOT
REVISED: 0INVI4 - PROPOSED PARKING LOT
AND ADDITIONAL TORO
STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5
Nov �wiud� wee lo�aey mbn.p
uneuea ah— perwewous surrey oerea 18aaa8,
PAPA —by ReKd r- 4Yenze, rNC RSV any
e.Me —IN.,u SPNNL tow LK(MA
GNSIRSe. GIN Get Carve1.1 MI- 45,VTG.M
he.®me- dKl.- dholiK AM Se area
arevaeerygennnee.
1 1� NO
I�
HASSEN
ED
2014
NING DFPT
OMMIER
I AND ,SURVEY oNO . LLC
Plan View
Scale:1 inch = 50 Ft.
d 13 13 pz v. h: a1 •.
dry? a
'
a17YOFCHANHAS5El
�.
a x, o, m d a a,
1,
RECEIVED
Porletlfd:
z 13�LPd
n I
_
.. w :, ° ,a 1, 4. Hans a.
�. m a,
APR 1 6 2014
o, o„ k bs de 'u 1. , lz � z A- V, %, d. h,
......... emwinmsu .ma...va++,nu°.nwnm..aanwn°
k
a. n. „ a3 a. a
L IL I G�
Voice Number: 18811722-1000
, \ s x 1. 1, d a a3 .o,.a• .,
CHANHA98ENPiANIVIN017F�i
ChichaEer, MN 55311
Fax Nurtet: I M Ill 1232
d Lo 4o a, h b+ °' h. b,
Neallope.MN 55,22
ugbUng Layout
a. a, a, U as b, b
designed beyond Standard,
Email Address: wwx.rabweb.mm
d, n, tl L dt._lu . . az a a
1fi3-56y1,5
Vamm.0
a.: to h, In ar a. a. •
ergineredti,parlo
Filename:\\PAB- STOMGE -10ou\ Sales \ApplicationsEngineeriMMob FllaskRWouz rGroup\VIWng Elettia \Minneapolis- Mankato 103883LLCare&erloMGl files \REVISED3 -Care
Fxteriar Layout 031114CAct
Plan View
Scale:1 inch = 50 Ft.
Lighting
- .,,,�,.��...i..e- ,,....a...... .
Porletlfd:
Job Name.
170 LUtlIUx Me. NMM1VaIG M Otrac 2
j {are EelNi.,
......... emwinmsu .ma...va++,nu°.nwnm..aanwn°
POUffNGROUP
Iage Pa,kCcrr1
L IL I G�
Voice Number: 18811722-1000
m.......«.m..m ....
2138 WInetka AM NO
ChichaEer, MN 55311
Fax Nurtet: I M Ill 1232
Neallope.MN 55,22
ugbUng Layout
Ed,
designed beyond Standard,
Email Address: wwx.rabweb.mm
VP °"°` ° ° " " ° _ ° "` °'°'° " °" ° °_ ° "'° °' °• °`°"^
1fi3-56y1,5
Vamm.0
ergineredti,parlo
Filename:\\PAB- STOMGE -10ou\ Sales \ApplicationsEngineeriMMob FllaskRWouz rGroup\VIWng Elettia \Minneapolis- Mankato 103883LLCare&erloMGl files \REVISED3 -Care
Fxteriar Layout 031114CAct
Calculation Summary
Label
CalcType
Urdts
Avg
Max
Min
Avg/Min
Max/Min
Description %Spdr
%SpcTb
Meter Type
Area
Illuminance
FC
0.51
10.1
0.0
N.A.
NA
Readings Taken at T -0 -AFG 10
10
Horizontal
Lumioaire Schedule
Symbol
Dry
Tag
Label
Arrangement
LUm.LUmens
AnNLUMAlsmens
LLF
Description
Lum.Vil
Arr.Watts
Total Watta
Filename
WPLED52
1
A2
ALED3T78x 2 @180°
BACK -BACK
6911
13822
1.000
78. Type 111
]8.4
156.8
156.8
ALED3T78- Cool- IIV9605.IES
Total Quantity:2
1
Lighting Layout
I WPLED52
SINGLE
5896
5896
1 1.000
1 52w Wallpack - IF Uptil[
1 60.7
160.7
10.7
1 WPLED52 - Cool - ITL79]50.les
Lumircaire Location Summary
mg lightlng
Prepared For:
mb Name:
LMnd40 Tag IQtyl
label
X
T
All NT
Orient
Tilt
1 C(1)
WPLED52
238.3
294.8
14
332.793
0
2 A2(2)
ALED3T78 x 2 @181Y
12682
1260.4
1 20
155,774
10
Total Quantity:2
New Lepage 554V
Lighting Layout
Ian 5
Email Address:www.rabwe6rwn
q� RECENED SEP(
APR '18 2014
�H�IHPS�� \� p►�,MNMO }�F'YT
NOTM
Thought loss from,(LLFPs a pmtluR of many ea rime,, only lamp lumen Eepredabon pil has been applied to mlmlatetl
results unless otheralse notes The LLD IN the result(puurrim of mean lumens /Initial lumens pan hams, manuhtturers '
Illumination values sM1Oxnin bottandles(or Lin Nliniment!) are the predided results for Bann of alculati one ither withered,
wild orindined as des moth In the calcWatlen more ry.Meter onmtatian is normal W the plane of<almlation.
The calculated results of this light, simulation represent an aMltlpmed prediction of system performarem.
Actual measured rMantsmayvaryhom the anticlpatN peROrmanre and are sublento mearoaM methodsemidr are beyond
Me mnvol.f PFDUgh rmg Inc.
Mounting height determination ispb sitespechl, ourlightlng simulation assume amounting height insertion point of the
Iuminaie symbelf 0 Wtaken at the top ofthe rymMlfor caring moudmil lumindres and at the botlom of Me WWI he all
orherlumineremo cntngconfgwatlons.
4
P54- 11 -20D2
r
A2: ALED3T78 x 2 @ 180°
C: WPLED52
S.I. as noted
WW /IB /2014
Drawn By Mike Mllnikkwl<x
Page 2 of 2
mg lightlng
Prepared For:
mb Name:
VO ILL= AVe N:LMke,NI 0I69I
Kam Eidenor
POUZEPGWUP
1430PaM1COUr1
L I G H T I N G
vdee NUmnan aaeerz -WO
27Miannnedu AVe No
enanhassen,MN SS3v
Faa Number; 1d00)22-II32
New Lepage 554V
Lighting Layout
Ian 5
Email Address:www.rabwe6rwn
)6 }583145
VersionC
engineered topedwm
Filename: \ \MB- STOPAC£- 110ac5\ Sales \Appli<aLlona EngineeeingVab Files \fllflauzer Group \Nang EleRd<1Minneepolis- Mankato 103803ULare
F #enorUGl5ile5WEN5ED 2VGre6terior Layou[031T4CAG1
S.I. as noted
WW /IB /2014
Drawn By Mike Mllnikkwl<x
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
May 8, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota;
that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for
Next Steps Learning Center Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2014 -15 to the persons named
on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such
owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with
postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing
as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other
appropriate records.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this day of M!2.4 2014.
Notary Pu is
Kardh J. E ge dt, Dep ty Clerk
p,wHAnn�nnn
KIM T. MEUWISSEN
. Notary Public- Minnesota
.' My Commhalon E*m im 31,015
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date & Time:
Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until
later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Location:
City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for Site Plan Review with Variances for a 3,000
Proposal:
square -foot building expansion on property zoned Industrial
Office Park (10P)— NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER
Applicant:
Jeremy S aude
Property
1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park)
Location:
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
What Happens
public hearing through the following steps:
at the Meeting:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
at the Meeting:
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project.
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the City's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -15. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI -Jaff
Questions &
by email at saliaffla')ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952 -
Comments:
227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
staff report for this item will be available online on the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
Planning Commission meeting.
City Review Procedure:
• Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations,
Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the
Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting.
• Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation.
These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of
the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of
the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a
recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning
Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the
City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial.
• Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant
waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any
person wishing to follow an item through the pmcess should check with the Planning Department regarding its
status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
• A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers
are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the
project with any interested person(s).
• Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and
any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have
something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification.
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date & Time:
Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until
later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Location:
City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for Site Plan Review with Variances for a 3,000
Proposal:
square -foot building expansion on property zoned Industrial
Office Park IOP — NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER
Applicant:
Jeremy S aude
Property
1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park)
Location:
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
What Happens
public hearing through the following steps:
at the Meeting:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project.
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the City's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -15. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI -Jaff
Questions &
by email at saliaff(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952 -
Comments:
227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
staff report for this item will be available online on the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
Planning Commission meeting.
City Review Procedure:
• Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations,
Remnings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the
Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting.
• Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation.
These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of
the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of
the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a
recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning
Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the
City Council except remnings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial.
• Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant
waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any
person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its
status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
• A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers
are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the
project with any interested person(s).
• Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and
any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have
somethina to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification.
DAVID SWARTOUT K & L PARTNERS MUSTANG LLC
10028 INDIGO DR 14417 LAKE STREET EXT 7860 PARK DR
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 -1206 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 -2923 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9294
PRN MUSIC CORPORATION
7801 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8201
TWO S PROPERTIES INC
PO BOX 25025
GLENDALE, CA 91201 -5025
SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC
1430 PARK CT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8901
STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT
395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD MAILSTOP
ST PAUL, MN 55155 -1899