The URL can be used to link to this page

Wetland Delineation 10-5-05 I -e- I Schoell & Madson, Inc. RECEIVED OCT 1 8 2004 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Engineering . Surveying · Planning Soil Testing · Environmental Services .WWW.schoellmadson.com October 5, 2004 Ms. Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator City ofChanhassen 690 Coulter Drive, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Subject: Wetland Delineation Fox Property - Lyman Boulevard and Powers Boulevard Dear Ms. Haak: Please find enclosed a copy of the wetland delineation report performed on behalf of Lundgren Brothers for the Fox Property in Chanhassen. A copy has also been sent to Mark Wilson at the RPBCWD. During the delineation, six wetland basins were delineated on the property. A review of aerial photography indicated no fewer than four additional areas that appeared to have hydric signatures. However, a field inspection of these areas revealed that they were not wetland areas. At your earliest convenience, I would like to site up a time to visit the site with you and verify the delineation. Please be aware that it is a large site and would likely require a sizable allotment of your time. If you have any other questions or other issues regarding this report, please feel free to contact me at 952.847.9637 or on my cellular phone at 952.457.7639. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. enc. cc: Ken Adolf, Schoell & Madson, Inc. Jason Palmby, Lundgren Brothers Mark Wilson, Barr Engineering Affirmative Action Equal Opportunity Employer 10580 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 1 · Minneapolis. MN 55305-1525 Office (952) 546-7601 · Fax (952) 546-9065 J â 1IIiIiiii~ Schoell & Madson, Inc. ., Engir-.ing . IJunMo¡Ing . PIMnIng ,..¡ SolI T-.g· ~_ www.echoeIrrødeon.com .. !IIIII~ -~ n JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Fox Property Chanhassen, MN Carver County Prepared for Lundgren Brothers, Inc. October 5, 2004 SMI Project 64000-276 &ŒUlIl -Ill I'" li Q ill rl " Sch()(:iJ t~ - ,.. - ,.. - ,.. ,.. ... ... ... ,.. ,.. ... ,.. - ,.. - ... ... 1. 0 Executive Summary .. ....................... .............................. ............... ...... ........... .... ........ ................ ........ ................... 2 2 .0 M etb 0 dol ogy ............................................. .......... .. ....... .......... . ................. ... .......... .. .. ........ .. ..... ........................ ...... 2 3 .0 Results aod Discussio o. ........... ................ ....... .................. .................... .......... ....... ..................... ........................... 2 3.1 Wetland Description ............. ....... ........ ......... ............... ................... ............ .............................. .............. ........... 2 3.1.1 Wetland 1 ...................................................................................................................................................2 3 .1.2 Wetland 2 ......................................... ....................... ................................... ................................................ 2 3.1.3 Wetland 3 ................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1.4 Wetland 4 ...... .......................... ...................................................................................................... ............. 3 3.1.5 Wetland 5 .......................................................................................................... ......................................... 3 3.1. 6 Wetland 6 .............................................................................................................................. ..................... 3 3.2 Site Description.. .............. ................ ......... ........ .... ................... ........ ............... .................. ............. ....... ............. 3 3.2.1 Topography............................................................................. .......................... .... ......................... ............ 4 3.2.2 Plant Connnunities ..................................................................................................................... ........... ..... 4 3.2 .2.A Wetland 1............................ ........................... ................................................. ............................ ....... 4 3 .2.2.B Wetland 2............... ...... ........................................................... ........ .......................................... ......... 4 3.2.2. C Wetland 3......................................... .................................................................................. ................ 5 3 .2.2.D Wetland 4... ....... ...................................................... ........... ....... ......................... ...... ..... ....... .............. 5 3 .2.2.E Wetland 5 ............... ..... ...................... ............. .................................................... ....................... ......... 6 3.2.2.F Wetland 6 .................................................................................................. ... .... .................................. 6 3.2.3 Soils............................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2.3.1 Mapped........... .................................. .................................................................................................. 6 3.2.3.1.A Wetland 1........................................................................................ ................................................ 6 3.2.3 .1.B Wetland 2 .......................................................................... .............................................................. 6 3.2.3.1.C Wetland 3 ..................................... ................................................................................................... 7 3.2.3 .1.D Wetland 4......... ................................ ..................... .............................................................. ............ 7 3.2.3 .1.E Wetland 5 ............................................................................................................. ........................... 7 3.2.3.1.F Wetland 6 .................................... ....................................................... .......... ................................... 7 3.2.3.2 Observed.................................... ......................................................................................................... 7 3.2.4 Hydrology...............................................................................................................................,.................. 7 3 .2.4.A Wetland 1.............. ............................................................................................................................. 8 3.2.4 .B Wetland 2..........................................................:................................................................................ 8 3.2.4. C Wetland 3........................................................................................................................................... 8 3 .2.4.D Wetland 4........................................................................................................................................... 8 3 .2.4.E Wetland 5 ..................................................... ...................................................................................... 8 3.2.4 .F Wetland 6 ............................................................. .............................................................................. 8 3.2.5 Records Review.................. ........................................................................................................................ 9 4.0 Co oel usi 0 0 .. ............... ...................... ............. ..... .......... ........... ............. ...... ............... ............. ............. ............... .... 9 5.0 Qualificatio os ........... ...... ......... ............. ....... ............... .................... ................ ....... .......... ............ ............. ........ ..... 9 6.0 Li ter a ture Cited ...... ............................ ............................. ........ .............. .......... .................... ..... .......................... 1 0 - - - Schoell and Madson, Inc. was contacted by Jason Palmby of Lundgren Brothers, Inc. to perform a jurisdictional wetland determination and delineation for the property known as the Fox Property. This property is located in Chanhassen, Minnesota south of the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Powers Boulevard. The wetlands were field identified between August 25, 2004 and August 28, 2004. A review of aerial photography revealed eleven areas that presented with potential hydric indicators. Of these eleven areas, two of the areas were depicted on the Shakopee Quadrangle of the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory Map as being entirely within the boundaries of the Fox property with a third basin extending on to the property. A copy of the NWI can be found in Appendix D. The soil survey for Carver County indicated that the majority of the soils on the property had at least one inclusion of a hydric soil unit. During the on site inspection, six of the areas were confirmed to be jurisdictional wetlands and their boundaries were delineated via the methodology described in section 2.0. That land that was not wetland was either forested or under cultivation of seed crops. - - ... ,.. ... ,.. The wetland was delineated according to the United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, 1987. A routine, on-site inspection was performed and transects were taken. The number of transect varied for each wetland depending upon the size of the wetland and the diversity of wetland typology present. No less than one transect was performed on any basin discussed in this report. A list of resources consulted for the wetland delineation and subsequent report can be found in section 6.0 of this document. ... ... """ 3.1 WETLAND DESCRIPTION """ ,.. 3.1.1 Wetland 1 Wetland 1 is a Type 2 wetland located northeasterly on the property. The wetland is a depression with elevation increasing sharply in all directions. An eighteen inch F.E.S. inlet structure is located I the northeast corner of the wetland. Lyman Boulevard borders the wetland to the north. The eastern and n boundary is adjoined by a wooded hill. The remaining adjacent land use is cultivated corn. ,.. IIII 3.1.2 Wetland 2 Wetland 2 is a large Type 2 and Type 3 wetland. Several areas along the perimeter of the basin are Types 6 and 7. A network of ditches has been constructed in the basin. This network eventually drains to the west to a large Type 4 wetland located on the adjacent property. This wetland is connected to Wetland 3 through a culvert under a field road. The upland area surrounding this basin consists nearly entirely of cultivated land. A review of IIII - - - ... aerial photography indicates that until approximately 1980, most of the wetland was annually planted in seed crops. ... ... 3.1.3 Wetland 3 Wetland 3 is similar to Wetland 2. Were it not for the field road, they would be considered parts of the same basin. Combined, these two basins stretch from the northeast quadrant of the northern 40 acres to the southeast quadrant of the same 40-acre parcel. The contributing watershed to these wetlands likely exceeds 70 acres although the exact size ofthe watershed has not been calculated. ... ,.. 3.1.4 Wetland 4 Wetland 4 is located in the southeast corner of the north 40-acre parcel. It is a Type 3 and Type 6 wetland with a small portion that is forested. Historically the basin has been cultivated with the exception of that portion which lies within the windbreak. This disturbance is evident in the soils and the relative youth of the woody vegetation. It is also visible in the aerial photography review. 1M """ ... 3.1.5 Wetland 5 Wetland 5 is located in the northwest corner of the southern parcel. It is a Type 2 and Type 3 wetland with a small pocket of sandbar willow located centrally along the southern boundary. It is surrounded by cultivated land on all sides. - 3.1.6 Wetland 6 Wetland 6 is a Type 7 wetland with an area of Type 2 in the interior extending to the northern extent where the canopy opens. The basin has a relatively diverse species composition and several vegetative layers. A drain tile inlet was observed in the northeast corner of the wetland. There is some evidence of erosion around the inlet and a large gully located southerly in the basin. The topography of this wetland is such that the basin drains from north to south and some channelization is evident in the wetland. - ... ... 3.2 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is approximately 91 acres in size. It is located in Section 23, Township 116N, Range 23W in Carver County, Minnesota. The topography consists of rolling hills with moderate to steep slopes with the wetland areas being located in the depressions between the hills or along the trees planted as windbreaks. There are no structures on the property and a majority of the land cover is cultivated crops. Both soybeans and corn are being grown on the property. The area that is not being cultivated is either wetland or forested. In some instances, both cover types are present concurrently. To the north, Lyman Boulevard borders the property. This is the only road frontage along the property. Adjoining properties elsewhere are either agriculture or, to the west, a large lot, single family homestead. ... """ """ ,.. - - ... ... ,.. 3.2.1 Topography The broad landscape generally decreases in elevation from north to south. On a smaller scale, the landscape is comprised of rolling hills with moderate to steep slopes. Elevation, on the site ranges form a low of less than 880 feet above mean sea level (msl) to a high point of greater than 950 feet above msl. ... ... 3.2.2 Plant Communities 3.2.2.A Wetland 1 Wetland 1 is a Type 2 (Wet Meadow) with a two small areas of Type 6 (Scrub Shrub) and Type 7 (Forested Wetland). According to the classification system developed by Cowardin, this basin would be a PEMB with inclusions ofPSS1B and PF01B. ... ... Vegetation observed at the sampling point included a thick mat of reed canary grass Phalaris arundinacea. The reed canary grass cover was greater than 100 percent of the ground in aerial extent. The overstory at the sample point consisted of black willow Salix nigra. Other plants observed in basin one, although not at the sampling point were box elder Acer negundo, sand bar willow Salix exigua, stinging nettle Urtica dioica, and giant golden- rod Solidago gigantea. - ... Upland vegetation was predominantly com Zea mays to the south and the west. To the north, the upland was Lyman Boulevard and the typical MNDOT seed mix associated with road right-of-ways. To the east, the topography sloped up abruptly. Vegetation in this area transitions to American basswood Tilia americana, American elm Ulmus Americana, and burr oak, Quercus macrocarpa. While the American elm and burr oak are adapted to live in wetter conditions, the abrupt change in topography was a good indicator that wetland was transitioning to upland. ... - - 3.2.2.B Wetland 2 Wetland 2 exists has a relatively large contributing watershed. Although the exact area was not calculated for this report, a rough estimate would place the watershed at between 25 and 30 acres. A ditch has been excavated through the wetland at what is roughly the centerline of Basin 2 and Basin 3. There are also several perpendicular ditches contributing to the larger centrally located ditch. ... ,. """ This basin is largely a Type 2 (wet meadow) and Type 3 (inland freshwater marsh) wetland with Type 5 (scrub shrub) and Type 7 (Forested wetland) wetlands located where the wetland narrows as it moves from east west. According to the Cowardin classification system this basin would be a PEMB and PEMC wetland with inclusions ofPSSB and PF01B wetland types. """ - Dominant vegetation located at transect 1 included boxelder Acer negundo and reed canary grass Phalaris arundinacea. Subdominant plants included wild black currant Ribes americanum and stinging nettle Urtica dioica. All of the plants located at the sample point were facultative plus or wetter. - """ - ... - Upland plants at this transect included common buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica, prickly ash, Zanthoxylum americanum, boxelder Acer negundo, burr oak Quercus macrocarpa, and garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata. With the exception of the boxelder, all of the plants located at this sample point were facultative minus or dryer. Another transect was performed at flag number ten. The community for this transect would be Type 6 or a PF01B. The dominant plants identified at the wetland sample point included the following: black willow Salix nigra, boxelder Acer negundo, red-osier dogwood Cornus stolinfera. All ofthese plants are facultative wetland minus or wetter. ,.. - ,.. The upland area for this transect was currently under cultivation. The crop cover was feed com Zea mays. Also present was great ragweed Ambrosia trifida. While the ragweed is a facultative plus plant, corn is not listed and, therefore, has a non-indicator (NI) status. As the corn constituted 75% of the aerial cover and the ragweed was less than 20 percent, this area was determined not to meet the vegetation criteria for wetland determination. - - 3.2.2.C Wetland 3 Basin 3 has a hydrologic connection to basin 2. A twelve-inch corrugated steel culvert flows under a field road between the two basins. It is likely that prior to the construction of this field road the two basins were part of the same lager basin. ... The plant community at this transect located at flag 3 was an ephemeral stream flowing through a type 6 (aka PFOIB) wetland. The dominant vegetation was a canopy composed of box elder with an understory of reed canary grass. Other plants noted at the sample point included great ragweed and showy milkweed Asclepius speciosa. All of these plants are facultative plus or wetter. ... ... The upland sample point consisted of cultivated corn. ... A second transect was performed at flag 14. The plant community at this sample point was a Type 7 wetland with a relatively open canopy. The overstory consisted of box elder. The herbaceous layer was comprised of pretty sedge Carex woodii, fowl bluegrass Poa palustris, reed canary grass, and wild black currant. All of these plants are facultative or wetter in habitat. """ ... The upland sample point consisted of cultivated corn. ,.. A third transect was performed at flag 14. This was an area that was plowed and planted but was currently denuded of all vegetation. Further into the interior ofthe wetland, the plant community was a Type 3 wetland that has been ditched. The Cowardin classification for this community is PEMCd. Like the last two sample points, upland vegetation consisted of com. ... ... 3.2.2.D Wetland 4 Basin number 4 is located in the southeast corner of the northern forty-acre parcel. It is a wetland complex consisting of Types 2, 6 and 7 wetland communities. In the Cowardin classification system these would be referred to as PEMB, PSSB and PF01B respectively. - """ - ,.. """ V egetation observed at the wetland sample point included American elm Ulmus americana, boxelder, red-osier dogwood, reed canary grass, wild black currant, giant golden-rod and great ragweed. Other plants observed within the wetland included sandbar willow and narrow leaved cattail Typha latifolia. All of the plants were facultative or wetter. """ Upland plants were com. ,.. 3.2.2.E Wetland 5 Wetland 5 is a Type 3 (PEMB/C) wetland with a small Type 6 (PSSB/C) inclusion located along the southern wetland boundary. Vegetation observed at the wetland sample point included a dense layer of reed canary grass with a few sandbar willows. Also visible in the wetland was stinging nettle and great ragweed. The species composition met the criteria for hydrophitic vegetation. - ,.. Upland plants consisted of soybeans. - 3.2.2.F Wetland 6 Wetland 6 is a Type 7 wetland with an area of Type 2 where the canopy opens. The wetland has a diversity of plant species and several vegetative layers. Plants observed within the wetland included American elm Ulmus americana, black willow Salix nigra, red-osier dogwood Comus stolinifera, burr oak Quercus macrocarpa, jewel weed Impatiens capensis, and reed canary grass. With the exception of the burr oak (F AC-) all plants were facultative or wetter. ... ... ,.. Upland vegetation to the north, south and east included cultivated soybeans. The upland to the west was marked by a sharp change in topography. Upland plants transitioned to American basswood Tilia americana, butternut Juglans cinerea, burr oak and prickly ash Zanthoxylum americana. ... - 3.2.3 Soils 3.2.3.1 Mapped A copy of the soils survey corresponding to the area can be found in Appendix C. 3.2.3.l.A Wetland 1 According to the Soil Survey for Carver County, the mapped soil unit at the location of Wetland 1 is Glencoe Loam. The hydric soil list for Carver County indicates that this soil unit is hydric in its entirety. ,.. """ """ 3.2.3.l.B Wetland 2 According to the Soil Survey for Carver County, the mapped soil units at the location of Wetland 2 are Glencoe Loam and Palms Muck. The hydric soil list for Carver County indicates that both of these soil units are hydric in their entirety. ,.. - - """ ... - 3.2.3.1.C Wetland 3 According to the Soil Survey for Carver County, the mapped soil units at the location of Wetland 2 are Glencoe Loam and Palms Muck. The hydric soil list for Carver County indicates that both of these soil units are hydric in their entirety. """ - 3.2.3.1.D Wetland 4 According to the Soil Survey for Carver County, the mapped soil units at the location of Wetland 4 are Kilkenny-Lester Loams and Hamel Loam. The hydric soil list for Carver County indicates that the Kilkenny-Lester Loams have inclusions of Glencoe and Hamel. Both of these soils are hydric. The Hamel Loam is listed as hydric in its entirety. - - 3.2.3.1.E Wetland 5 According to the Soil Survey for Carver County, the mapped soil unit at the location of Wetland 5 is Glencoe Loam. The hydric soil list for Carver County indicates that this soil unit is hydric in its entirety. ... ... 3.2.3.1.F Wetland 6 According to the Soil Survey for Carver County, the mapped soil units at the location of Wetland 6 are Terril Loam and Hamel Loam. The hydric soil list for Carver County indicates that the Terril has an inclusion of Hamel, a hydric soil. The Hamel Loam is listed as hydric in its entirety. - - 3.2.3.2 Observed ... Soils observed in the wetland pits were found to present with hydric indicators. Conversely, the soils in the upland pits were found to be lacking in hydric indicators although some presented with low chroma. In general, the soils were consistent with profiles typical for the mapped unit. However, given the land use, many of the profiles were observed to have been disturbed by cultivation. For a detailed review of observed soils, please see the attached data sheets. ... """ """ 3 .2.4 Hydrology With the exception of two sample points, no hydrology was encountered in any of the sample borings. All were left open for no fewer than ten minutes, however, given that the soils tended to be heavy clays, it is conceivable that more time was required for capillary action to conduct water to the borings. Further, it is important to note the timing of the delineation and the effect this may have on water table elevations. - """ Precipitation data was acquired form Station 211448 Chanhassen WFO from the High Density Radius Retrieval website maintained by the University of Minnesota, Climatology Department. Precipitation for the year to date totaled 32.62 inches. Average precipitation for the entire at this station is 30.44 inches. For the month of September, 5.40 inches of - - IIII ... IIII precipitation was recorded at this station. This is 2.43 inches above the normal precipitation of 2.97 inches. This above normal month was subsequent to an August in which precipitation was 2.35 inches below normal. The net deviation from average precipitation for the two months preceding the delineation was plus 0.08 inches. This is statistically normal for this time period. IIII ,.. 3.2.4.A Wetland 1 Although no hydrology was directly observed in transect number 3, three secondary indicators were observed. These indicators were oxidized root channels in the upper twelve inches of the soil profile, the FAC-Neutral Test, and recorded data on the local soil survey. Hydrology was assumed to be present at some point in the growing season based upon these three secondary indicators. """ ... Saturated soils were observed at a depth of eight inches within the wetland boring at transect number 9. In addition, several primary and secondary indicators were present. - 3.2.4.B Wetland 2 No direct observation of hydrology was made at transect number one. However, two primary indicators of hydrology and three secondary indicators were observed. Trees within the wetland area had widened buttresses and exposed roots. Channeling was also evident. Oxidized root channels were observed in the upper twelve inches ofthe soil profile. Other indicators included the FAC-Neutral test and local soil survey data. ... """ Similar evidence was observed at transect 1 O. In addition, drift lines of dried and matted leaves and grass were observed. """ 3.2.4.C Wetland 3 No soil saturation or free water was observed in either transect of Wetland 3. However, several primary and secondary indicators of hydrology were observed. These included; water marks, drainage patterns, local soil survey data, and the F AC-neutral test. - ... 3.2.4.D Wetland 4 No soil saturation or free water was observed in either transect of Wetland 3. However, several primary and secondary indicators of hydrology were observed. These included; water marks, drainage patterns, local soil survey data, and the F AC-neutral test. - - 3.2.4.E Wetland 5 No soil saturation or free water was observed in either transect of Wetland 3. However, several primary and secondary indicators of hydrology were observed. These included; drainage patterns, local soil survey data, and the F AC-neutral test. - """ 3.2.4.F Wetland 6 Saturated soil was observed at 14 inches. Although this is not within the top twelve inches of the soil profile, two primary and two secondary indicators were also observed. - - I- ... ,.. ... ... ,.. ,.. """ ... """ - ... - ... """ ... - - - 3.2.5 Records Review No previous delineation reports were reviewed for this delineation. Historical Information Gatherers, Inc. provided aerial photograph coverage of the area. Aerial photographs from 1937, 1940, 1951, 1957, 1963, 1970, 1980, 1984, 1991, 1997, and 2003 were reviewed. The review did reveal some areas were apparent hydric footprints were evident. Upon inspection of these areas, it was determined that they were not wetlands because they were either fully supporting crops or they were located at a higher elevation on the landscape. Aerial photograph review did reveal that Wetland 2 and Wetland 3 were cropped in every reviewed year prior to the 1980 aerial photograph. However, a ditch is visible in every year reviewed. Based upon the presence of hydric soils and hydrophitic vegetation, coupled with the assumed hydrology, six areas have been delineated as a wetland. Efforts should be made during planning and construction to avoid impacting the wetland primarily and secondarily. The site lies within the Bluff Creek Watershed boundaries. Bluff Creek is within the Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District. According to the Wetland Conservation Act of 1996, wetlands on this site come under the jurisdiction of the Board of Water and Soil Resources. The responsibility for administering the provisions ofthis legislation is up to the local unit of government (LGU). In this case, the City of Chanhassen will oversee as the LGU. The project must be certified by the LGU as having complied with the provisions of the Act. Wetland impacts must be replaced or restored at a minimum ratio of 2 acres of replacement for every 1 acre impacted. These mitigation activities must occur within the same watershed as the impact occurs. The act also mandates that restoration or creation of replacement wetlands only be considered after an applicant has demonstrated that the impacts cannot be avoided, further minimized, corrected, or eliminated over time. This requirement is essentially the same as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit process. During the final design process, effort should be taken whenever possible to avoid and minimize wetland impacts. By utilizing this approach, wetland replacement costs will be kept to a minimum and any additional permitting will be more easily facilitated. In addition, this strategy should result in a greater level ofproject acceptance Mr. Jeffery has been employed as an applied scientist of natural resources for over six years. He has completed over 200 wetland delineations throughout the upper Midwest. He has earned a B.S. in Natural Resource Assessment with a minor in Forestry form the University of Minnesota and a B.S. in Biology and Earth Science from Minnesota State University, Mankato. He has continued his education by taking the Basic Wetland Delineators course offered through the University of Wisconsin, La Crosse and the MnRAM training offered by the Minnesota Board of Soil and Water Resources. ... """ · """ · """ Some or all of the following sources may have been used in the research and compilation of this wetland delineation and subsequent report. · Britton, Nathanial and Hon. Addison Brown, An Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States and Canada, VI-III, 2nd Edition Dover Publications, Inc., New York · Harlow, William M. et aI, Textbook of Dendrology, ih Edition, McGraw Hill, Inc., © 1991 · Knobel, Edward, Field Guide to the Grasses, Sedges, and Rushes of the United States, 2nd Edition, Dover Publications, Inc. New York ©1980 · Soil Survey Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, Sixth Edition Pocahontas Press, Inc., Blacksburg, VA, © 1994 · Uva, Richard H. et aI, Weeds of the Northeast, Cornell University Press © 1997 · Vance, F.R. et aI, Wildflowers of the Northern Great Plains, University of Minnesota Press, ©1984 · National Wetlands Inventory, Shakopee. Minn., United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, 1989 · National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Minnesota, United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, May 1988 · Protected Waters and Wetlands, Carver County Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1983 Wetland Delineation Manual, US Army Corps of Engineers January 1987 Soil Survey, Carver County Minnesota, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Novemebr 1974 """ """ IIII """ - ... - - - - - - """ - """ ,.. ,.. ,.. """ """ Appendices """ - - ,.. - ... - - """ ... - ... ... - , ž' ,) \ , " ;; ) \' ) ) ) \ " , · \ \ , \ ¿ \ " ) , ) , j £i '. · it ) ,) if , H :( 5 j ) · ) ,," " . , , i · ) " " ""- ) , , " " \ ) ) . \ ,\ " ) ) "" "0">" ,>,,' ) >"v,,~ >,,~» " f ). " j j í I . \ , ), " " .' , . " , " ) "" i , ) " , " " ) ¡ , , , " ,"",> '>'"" (f If " J \ , I NO " .. ..' , , ) , , , , ( Prepared for Lundgren Brothers Project Number 64000-276 ) j . " v,<'>'" """" Schoen & Madson$ Inc EIIQlnearlnQ " Surl/eying $ Planning Soil Testing * Enl/jronmantal Sal'l/lcaa ,oJ ",,>,vu,," >u , "0 "" v",> v,p> »'" , · · · · ,. »""""",u' ., ,0> oJ' .oJ vu> pifI! ,,, ~ <: '" " ^ '" '" ^ . ^ ^ , ( '" . '" '" , ^ ( " ( ! ( ( '" ( , ( ( ill ~ , , t" H '-"""""0=""'" It " H It 't i" " Ii (f " ~ f¡f¿-]!;~J: '" M \ "H *' Vø ø ( ". it""".{" I ,4- , I - ., , ( \ I I¥ ! '" " (( ( , '!We 111 , CHASKA 1f(71¢' U';¡ '" ^' ^ . '" ^ ( '" , " ì - .. ¡ ì '" " , ¡ , í ¡ !I .. " , ( , · '" , , , Prepared for Lundgren Brothers Project Number 64000-276 , . ^ . , , , , ";/";,/ú,, ."",.,{"{",{~"{~{¡0 ,¿{,*_'"0_"~{",,,0 ,~{^__""""f; Schc)eU . ( S Madssn$ Inc,¡ , ( , .",.' "'~{"{' ,,,,,,,,,,, · ( , * SliNeyil'i£! . PIElI'iI'i!I'i£! El'ivl¡"OI'i111I!ntl!! SI!N¡I~I!!I El'igil'il'il'i¡"il'ig Sol! Tasting * ¡ · , , í ( ,,,,,,,. ,{,",""""" '"' '" , , , ",'"","""'''''' "". ""''''' h" """,r,,'''' , "","', ,," ",,' "," .."m,,"""" ">' "",{ "".{,,{, {,{j"".,., .", ",,' "'hr",,""""""" ""M"",", "'h";""""" "'" """ , """"""""."~.,."."",,,,.,,"""'''''''m'''~'''_''{ "''''''',,'' """ """"",""" :;:c, C;";:::,, ,,,,,,,,,,, """ H" ,{ :m: CII;:::: ,I r::mJ: ::: :1"1" '<' ::':: \\1::' ',,·"'WH"i:' ,·h.· "",,,'.,., ",,,.,,.',,""'"''''''''''''''''''''''',,,,,,''' ",,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,, ",,,...,,,,,,.,.,,..,,,,,, .".., ,,,.,, , ,,,.,.,,..,.,, "".'.. "",,'" , ·..,..N .'" '"'''''''''''''''W''''''''''''' """,.".",,,..,', """"". ",""'" """''''.,..,.",, "",.,,, "",",," ".,,,,,,,,,,, j""" ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ¡ . , , · Prepared for Lundgren Brothers Project Number 64000~276 , , . , , , , , , ; , , \^'"'''' , , , , · , ¡ .."." SchoeU & Madson~ Inc:: Engineering $ Surveying '" Plenning Snil Taating $ Environmental SaMlicoa "."""""., ".,,,., ,,_.., , , , , , ) , , . " , , ¡ , ""..", " .,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,, · " .. ",,,, """"'''''',,'.. "" ".",. "".,.,.,,,,,,,,,.,.,. ".". ,.,,, 'N."·'" """"".."""." j",,,,,, '''''''''''''''''''''' ,"'''',,''''m "^"",,,,,,,,,,,·,'..,,,,.,,m.,,,,^,,''^'''' """, .'"'''' '"'''' ......,.., ",,,,,,,.,,.,,,... '"'''''''''''' ."', "w"""",,,,,,,,",m """"""'''''''J ~~I:::¡,:: :m¡: i:t.:: :::~::n¡ UJi!J,,:CL,:.L:.....::c III 1111L::T:m: Uj , ¡ , , · " " , · · , , , , , , , , , · i -. = ""'f I I , , . . "'.", »", ,,~ , i / i , I ! , . . , "".",., I i " I , ·'h i '" "" " , , Prepared for Lundgren Brothers Project Number 64000-276 Schoel! & Medson~ 1002 Engineering " Surveying ~ Planning Soil Testing % En\l!ronn~enUlI Servlcss ",,,,,,,".,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,"^,' q'".,.".". , , , , , i · , I , · I · I · , .., ,j '", ,,,,.,,, '<'" "",,,,, .".".,., '" 'uh' .,,,, "" "" ',",.." ,,", 'h' '.""""",,>.,,, .,n, ','h, .,,,,., ." '"'''' ""m" ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, """""" '"'''''',:""."..~''' ~,~,,-~._~""'-~~ '""'" ".,,,,,,,"',,, . ! ¡ Jl :1 J ,JUII!::! m' ;::3 !.f " ¡::í ~, #'1\ i!i3 W · f:r 41 I:l (~ m !W~ 0 J 5 :3 -, -, (\ ::3 +& !JC tJI ','M , , , , , ; " ¡: h~ø"" , i ; , , i i j , i · · , , ( ; ; j HI i t;$k ." " \# ,~, ,- m ::; j ¡- ;'ißMW ; (if :;t' : If! ~ i tt m :::; " ,fA Me" ,,'kW þf$ j C ¡ ( 41 · · , , , · ( ¡ ( , , · , ¡ , '''" """""',,, """""',,, , , , , , ¡ , ( . , , fJ) (') ::r :3 m - - ø ..( :3 (') ,,,,,, Y' .",,/(\, ",,"W', /""""""'''' ; , , ¡ , , , · · ; · ¡ , i · · · · j t ; · , , · , · , , , , · ¡ , · , , i , , · , , · · , · , ¡ · , , , j , ",,,,.,,, ,.,' 4ir 8= tI)' 8. 'ï.1 !l~ (¡i 'Ít:tI)"d O\=~ .jÄ tI) ot:Øø. 0'" 0~Õ" , ::r'" '-"'(I) ~;A ,'''''''',''',',',,, ",^,,"'" ¡ , ~ , i , ; ¡ , , , , , , , , "",- ~M= m,,,,,"" ^'~,,- ,- _i 1":1'"'' "', "11: , .~ . "'ÚM>~M ,.,,,,, :u1l ::;:""""" ,,' ...... '''"'',, < "" ,'i ,"" ,/, ,', '," ,H, i'i,- ',< ~;lj "i, :Ë; ",,' 't+ ,:'; . P h,,'H 'H" '?(/' i;\,,:;L':," :>, ,,/i qi ~l~ <, 'f> :¡¡V . >'-' ,Xi ",> ,,' ,;il} 't!1 '-)\' ':Y ;<' '// iA 're fit; i,'," /0 ¡f¥;' t?F [if¡ ",",i !'~\ i:ii Ì&l 41\. ~;'~;;,l - Xi,"'-','" ;11<">' )1;;';(' y,' p ?Jtj\:,)~ slS1,t-;' - š!YJ'> {ý,yr:> ,',' >\¡ ','):\' "'i, '>Y Of,-', :':1< 'i,'" ,'j :/f If />i;- '-ns Wi:: P;¡; ,'i'" r:-)' i,'i_ -:'.< - Vj>/'>' !~:;:;TJ' 1'i/'}-' t,r ,f'! \itj- '""," >1é 'i", ,',,-',, ',?,; ¡~j <"'z' p /flY::): 1Ù::>:':S' :flY," ,',,'y i,'" "'",',, ,',",' H,'C" '''.'x 11¡~J p «<,r" i[;J± ¥\L;'i'H :i:¡>;'':'::' <'1< f:J;Ä )/> "'C".'- iii' ;U;: ",c,; '-"<,, ';;f Ti'H ;,'''c,' ','" !t\i);: :\{W~ ,'J', ,',r> ~:';:1 :;111: "iy <",'" , ,':--."F ""x- ¡I:¡y - "",','/Ci \*t1,:g~', ',';i',"'" ;g:' p žtfiY'i X""' p,H," - tYi??Y? gL?i/: ï,f:<,r:: K1i~ ::XX ,hi- ','i;,": ')LS U', i:i/< , ¡;;It, if'l!! i::':\i' ';A> '",,, . ;,y/// >y:>"'" iE":"';.':" >>'h 'XJi¡ ,:1-â ,:f?; "» V';',. ~;f;¡¡ ;'i" ;i;:ji:, ,,,,,',,' if:;? ,-,,/, i:« "f «i. ,. \c/'/ "e" +,','H' it!?:>"~ 'Ie)"" p ",-<:'i":', ",/,,"',,' i:\X'>'-'" ',", Y:b\ ;',;:W '"",,,", 'i; :'// :>:1) 'iff fiX ,<',,; ,,/: ,,',/; !!iII''' "p'."" ;';f];\ '-:"i< ,>'-'> ',',/ ~~;rf '"i,,', :,':{~ ;tit:; sx< :;'lll' }~i;~i «::,> ::':-;:f; , ;11,--'!- ;i:~~~ ,'itP ViN: ¡';{~j: ,i::-,'t< 'x,::p :¿-\:i ~~~£; fi-> :15> /,>' - 'e""" ",,,,H' Vi;;':- ",' }:', - -/,"'<" 1}1\;';:-'" ~i.;',;': ;,ì~¡ '23;; ;;;~ij, Ö;l:~ (;lft~ ""," <'iiL,= '" if;>:-' F:" if}':::""/- """""""" r 0 0 ='" r - 0 Z Q 0 ='" m - z » ¡:;, m -I Z ~ 0 0 :;u 0 -I ::IE :I: Z m » » m -I -I ::IE » m -I -I :E .. » m Z -I 0 .. N » Z 0 ~ r 0 0 ='" - z r Q 0 Z 0 0 ='" ;;0 - Z -I ø :I: Z » 0 Ill' ;;ø :;u -I 0 :I: m ¡¡;n » ::IE -I m ::IE -I m .. -I Þ r Z » 0 z ~ 0 N -I 0 ï ..( ::J: » Z to .. <; 0 " "mW11--!1"U""""'" ",,""""" , __'M"""''' " II " ililil""""il.,,,,,,, ilO'" il""__""',,____ --,--'" n"",,,,,,,,,,,'''' . --" : 1I:;¡:i!1 ,:::c::: U::Ut\WiM@illl[ "',,,,,,---- '11:11 l. lLlJ¡í¡¡ÆIL__""",U¡;IIJ\tr;¡¡j¡lg¡¡l!lli~~,_ [I J :: ::: m II; fIW'" r J '0 " '0 . ;;Ii: ~ z r t;;> » 0 0 -I ;;ill{ J:> - ;:¡: Z m G') » '0 :iE "T! m :\IE m ~ m -I ~ , » :I: '0 Z ;n ""T! '0 0 <: {A c: m (;) .ç¡, :\IE ::I: m ~, ., -I --i )::>~ -( .,z - -¡;¡ '00 m z::u , '0 '" "¡"¡ '"U ,-¡ m '0 ;0 - r Z )::> ø z rn '0 -I þo :x: ~ J:> ., :iE ~ m w'Ø 0 ~ r m Þ z c Z 0 0 m a N r '0 '0 :x - z G) Z '0 AI -I :x: m » VJI -I )::> (') :\IE::U :::¡'O Igs )::>~ -< ø, rom AI ¡:¡:¡N"J ø- (A '0 "T! '0 :::¡)::> 0-1 II m» :n-l I )::> ø tII m m z )::> AI m - Z -I m AI Vi m .-. -I m '0 r '0 '0 :x ~ z ;;:, Z '0 :u -I :x: tII -< Z '0 :u -I I m :Þ ø -I » r '0 Z ;;:, :\IE m ., r » '0 z (A m '0 C Z '0 » ::u '"""" » , '0 Z G) '0 ~ ., .-. ::J: ""'~""~,_._-~ ".m," ',-- :l,,,,,.,,,,,''''''CC ''''UL'L''U'''''''' ""JU::: [ ."",~~" ~ X/i", '".",' 4>,\' /i" if!/IIJI ;~~;3;s: {{f'" ;;2-;; ~ ¥iW<' r o o ;X - z ø if!/IIJI ~;i:IiT;,' m Þ ø -i >,,' »,-". ;>)' Þ -i if!/IIJI mY-?5< ~~¡;,Ô;; c ::¿ "IJ m tv- <. 0' Þ :::Ð m Þ . i0X»> f$><> ó\:,· - ~ ÆVW3ìT )", :i\Y'i' 'x,-"" c W;·'/ z :¡¡: m -i r Þ Z o +" ., ~ '''''''" ;y;., ~:{);i if!/IIJI 1%(1:::}: i{{¡X:>: <:l>i:·' f> if!/IIJI "'.",., ~1:.;;;,:~; II +::'''''' KtX'" i,?Y {,'. f-'" if!/IIJI '<c',' "/":'''',.' f£<~/ ,<-:-:e, if!/IIJI ¥W'lL< "', S/" >cr'· t- O o ;;>;; - z '" II """^,'''' Àf> :~n,» m ]> m -i ]> -! - 117M? i¥A:;;-:C' :¡¡: m -i ¡- Þ Z o ~([,);:;:: ~ +7\':'" &i/;,'/ 01 Lf' if!/IIJI ttrw {iI/>' if!/IIJI }'>"'" v',>,:: L1'<» K\?;>';': if!/IIJI ',: b^" f::Þ'Y" - \\'''2\'? . %ÞI"I{Ii" c?\Ì, "')B'f~P», 8" ','. c., , 'w;/t ,,,d,,,,,,,,,';¡j14 \,jZ1<:sr'I'%' *::4~ !JifJ¡&',J9{I;J1%~¥4 +f({t)V'2 "'''''1'' /+<.":/'A<: }i~ ;1$"""""""'''" " \f!!é4'i{:x" r;AiQ$tØ~(if}ÄÇ::;^' \(ÞfI:;t'J4!e< "''''''<j-'''-'Jr., ), \"1'<' '<:"'-"/&6. ,J.[' ',<>t< ,,""" . 'Ù"ýyH::C:0>, "", i'h ., '''0',+>",,) "/""''"'' "'''<'''':': '-";'1: ~ f' " , >"!0Úy"<o" /Ø;<dÍ!:'>c . ·';1F·' '.,-: o Ñ Þ - Z ø - Z -i o c 1- o o ;X - z ¡;;, ø o c:. .....¡ :¡:; þ .....¡ --i --< "IJ m +" :¡¡: m .....¡ r þ Z o :¡¡: :r - n :r o - -i n :r - z ~ m .....¡ r Þ Z <:I N þ Z a (Þi r o o Ã -, Z ¡;;, ø o c:. .....¡ :¡:; m Þ ø -i Þ -i ]> ;a m Þ - NZ -i:¡¡: Om --i¡:::! --<]> -Uz mo -..¡ l:~ - ""~, ~ -i :¡:; ]> -i .....¡ ;a ]> z ø - -i - o Z ø "IJ ~ 3: --i --< "IJ m -, "", c >, c ? """'''''''''' ""","" --, ""'''''''''''' ~; ", ,."''''''' ,,,- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix G Data Sheets I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.1 Transect #: 3 Stake: 1W Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEMB/C Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? No 9/25/04 Applicant/Owner: Lundgren Bros County: Carver City: Chanhassen Ves No Vegetation !6orTÚn~-ñ¡~Plãr1t·-.~"·"''' - . - 00", ~~ ··...-¡-.-Stäiu-s-:..-- Î ··Stratum Non-Dominant Plants . ":--T~Stã-tüs-:-TSïr'ãtLlln ¡ : Phaiarísl.arUhdinacea ¡ 100 ! FACW 5 UlmusAmericfma .. 110 FACW·· 11 I !. Salix" njgt:ä·;. ~I OBL. . . T . I ~ .' .... I 'I ., I' ~ ... .. . . . ,". . . . I t~ :~~~~==-~:-:]~l~-:~~=-:-l :~~=:-J_-~~=~ ·~=~;=~:-:~f~~___T: ==:::_::-:-: Vegetation Strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? 100% FAC or wetter Soils -be .th-(Tn-n;ches IHorizo.¡,----- '! r\~ätri'x Color q.:tq:LA-_____..c_ _. ..... .._: ...:...._~___: 1 OY.~_~/2 ~.1 O~~_~_J_ª_on.. .. _00___' ¡ 5/1_QY.. I~'~~~~--~'---' . __...n~_~=_~~n¡ ! Gleying I Mottle Colors :_.___ _..._u ...1 ~_._~y...!,-ª ._ ____ . .. . : 5Y~_~!_~.___ _.._.. _ i 5YR 4/3 .._____~~ - ,_ - . .. __n___.___._. I . __.___ i ; TextureíStructure i . , :_ LoamY..._~L~_y.n_. . ....___....._ ..._... n..' L..f..!.~~____._._ .n . _ . _.. _ .. . i . -. C--· .-..:-_.........~-_~~~~~~~~:~:~_.~._.. _ i ---..-.... X On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor X Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking X Concretions Are the soils hydric? Yes Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators X Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary X X Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Is Wetland hydrology present? Yes: assumed based upon secondary indicators Are Wetland soils present? Yes Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Rationale for jurisdictional decision .. .. -- ,. ...- . .. . n.. .. .n I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.1 Transect #: 3 Stake: 2U Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEMB Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? No 9/25/04 Applicant/Owner: Lundgren Bros County: Carver City: Chanhassen Yes No Vegetation '[JömrhMfPIé1rìt <' ... / ¡ Solidago CéJnacJensis i Phalar!s arundinaceA i I 0/ /1) Stêtùs" , Slrnlull1 Noh:'b'ò¡niháiifÞ!nrHs" FACU ; 5 ! FAGIN i!) ·1 % IS!2ti..JS' Stratum I (30 ! 30 Vegetation Strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? No Soils ! De¡Jth(in ¡nches)/H6rizon i.,,1atr!x Cola:' ~O·~L~___. ._____.... ._. __.. . :_'. 10YR 5/3 3-18 / A2 Fill material ...-------_. - . ..--..- ------ --.-¡- :Gleyi'ng ; r',iaUic:) Colors :. ì !-.~~~~- ~---=! . - , Texture/Struc:u~0 .._ n . ._~_~~my~al]c!.___u 'uo . n.....__.. . !. _S.~~~EJ!!YJP..~~.....____ n __: '. . ----- ---.. --..'.: - .. _.~_._~-~-. ~.~ n 1_ .. ". -. .. ....---.---.. . .__ ._. . ~__.n...___ ___.. __ ._.___ .._ ...---- . I . _.__ ..._._n ___.._._ _.. _. .._ .,_ _ ... I On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking Concretions Are the soils hydric? No Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits _ Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is Wetland hydrology present? No Are Wetland soils present? No Is the plant community a wetland? Rationale for jurisdictional decision No None of three criteria present at sampling point. COMMENTS: Located 25 feet from shoulder of Lyman Blvd. Recently mowed and soils consist of fill material from road constnlction. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.1 Transect #: 9 Stake: 1W Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEM/SSB Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils. and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? No 9/25/04 Applicant/Owner: Lundgren Bros County: Carver City: Chanhassen Yes No Vegetation _ ___ :Dorninant:Plant I % I Statu,s i Stratum Non-Dominant Plants ! % . Status Stratum ¡ Phéi/ads:ahmdínacea· ~ 20 I FACW I 5 Polygonwn pennsvlvaníca ,5 ! FACV'{ 1 i Sa/h(~xiqLlf1. ~ 25 ! OSLo I 3 Scimus spp ! 5 i Oal 5 [_~'!!É~o~j~ trif!9.?__.. ..: .._.. _ ___I 2.9 ~._. F..ðÇ~..____; 5. _ . ,! I I I --. -. ------------~.-:.--_.--.-- .. . n! .-..- ---.-- -----,-- ~.~_......~_._~_.-_.--...~.~.-.-_.-_~_-.....:~..=..~_~.~.~_._~.~-.__~__- '. ::-.:---_-.. .__. ~_.--.~_.-~.,_ -.. .._n·.'~L¡ _._.__.: ~_·-~_--~-·'-.-·~__~·"ir-_-...-_·._. -~~ . -- =~=.-.-.~-'~-------''''---'----'' -------, --. ;_ou___ . ---: ....--. i I ._m _.'._n___ ..._.-.._~~~-=~=_~~.. ....~~~~. . .:-- :__"-[~~..- . _.~...~~_~_._--,,-----_. -i i Vegetation strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBl, FACW, and/or FAC: Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? 100% F AC or wetter i Matrix Color . Gleving i Mollie Colors .. -iy~~_ t ._-~~ ¡ : Texture/Structure -,-'=:~a~_y sa.~~_._._ __~___ _~_ _.i _ i S!!ndy'._~_a.y.l<.:.'_~m .__... _'.. ...: i Sandy clay . .: .__ oA____. .___ _.______ , . ____u__ ___n_. _.._ __...__ .- -- -.-- .__. "._ _. .u . "---. ...-- --- ----. .-. ---~- X On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor X RedudngcondWons High organic content Organic streaking X Concretions Are the soils hydric? Yes Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to Saturation: 8" Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation X Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks X Sediment deposits X Drainage patterns ¡nwetlands Secondary indicators X Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves ~ Local soil survey data ~ FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Is Wetland hydrology present? Yes Are Wetland soils present? Yes Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Rationale for jurisdictional dedsion Three criteria present Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.1 Transect #: 9 Stake: 2U Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEMB/C Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? No 9/25/04 Applicant/Owner: Lundgren Bras County: Carver City: Chanhassen Yes No \f.e._ge~<ltio~ ___ i Dominant Piant· loa nJays ~--._- --.. ! % ! Status I Stratum I I ¡ % : - Siat-u-s'-- - I Stratum Non-Dominant Plants 75 i NI .' I 5 ------.... . - -. - --... - : ~ ¡ .~~-~~.-. ...~~'- .__.~__'--.: _~:-_.. ~-~C-·:· :':_~~~=-~~'=~i_~_ ..._____ ...n __ __ .~. ··n' ___.____. \. _::~~~_~~...~: -:~:~~:~. _ ·:-~=7:_ ~~=:--".-. :'~¡I'" I . . .. _____... - .. ______.., ._. __0·'· . 'n. ... a _ .-- .----..--... - ... --. -- ..-"-- Vegetation Strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? No Matrix COlor 1 OYR 4/2 ,Glevirg ¡ ~·,k)~lIe Colors I Texture/Structure :. Sa~d~.:~~Jp~.IT1_ .~_:._.___-.J : Clá· . .: . ,___':1...__. .. -----.-. - ..- .---.-.---... . "1 .. i.--__... .,:,--..~~ ~-.:-==-~--=~--=! . --- - -. ........ . -I~· ____m___. i . .-¡ .._----,--_. ....____.. _ n____ , .-.---... ----------...-..-.---.-. J~~ ---=¡ , . .. u__··___ _ ,._____. . _. _.. On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking Concretions Are the soils hydric? No Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is Wetland hydrology present? . No Are Wetland soils present? No Is the plant community a wetland? Rationale for jurisdictional decision No None of three criteria present at sampling point. I I I "-I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.2 Transect #: 1 Stake: 1W Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: 9/25/04 Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Applicant/Owner: Lundgren Bros Project Site: Fox Property County: Carver City: Chanhassen Plant Community / Name: PFOB/C PEMB/C Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is this a Problem wetland? No Veg_~tati<?_~__.. .. .___... ._ _n___.____. Dominant Plant : Phalaris'aiundinacea ! Ace,. negundo . . --.. - - . ¡ Strat~ 5 I 14 1 . _....i I , "...-" ---.-.. . Non-DOIì1 inaníPlants Urtica cfiioica' . Ribes americanum % I Status FACIN.· ; FACW- I Straturn 15 I 1 10 10 __u" .___. .. . .. - _m__. _. ___.~ ._n. .___..___.. ..--..,.... .. Vegetation strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? 100% F AC or wetter Soils I Q~ptli (iriir.iëhes)if-ïûf¡žon -.-:-... : ~1atrix Cü(or--- :Gley¡ng':'MötÜë Colors ... n'lTexture/Structure I ~-~:~~~e:ri:s._-_.:~=~_:-.~-=~. _---]-..2.5= ~.'.?~~. -.:~.__.. -:-¡~__ '. .-"~I-~--·----·- :.... - . .___n_ -~~;~m..~n~--5aí1Cj=.~.-:-~:-"j 1.~::_19/.~_....:..:.._..__.._ __~_.___ 1_?.'5/~. -.. n__ L--.---....-. Ii 5YR 4/6 . ¡ ,=óa~Y_c;I~L_____ .. .... .. _ . J . . . I : ¡ .__. .___._. ____._.. - ._. __.. __ ..... .._. . .___n 1._.____. ______. ! X On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor X Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking X Concretions Are the soils hydric? Yes Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches X Water marks Sediment deposits X Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators X Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary X X Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Is Wetland hydrology present? Yes: assumed based upon secondary and primary indicators Are Wetland soils present? Yes Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Rationale for jurisdictional decision I Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd, Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.2 Transect #: 1 Stake: 2U Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: 9/25/04 Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Applicant/Owner: Lundgren Bros Project Site: Fox Property County: Carver City: Chanhassen Plant Community / Name: PF01 B / PEMB Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is this a Problem wetland? No Vegetation .. I. D"ominant Plant :' Rhamnus: catharticÐ . Alliaria petio/eta' i Acer negundo ! Quercus macrocalpa _~§'!..~~)E..~y/urr!._ ~mer[c~)J2~Jm .. --.-.- -- .--.".. ... ..-- - - ---.---. I I I I (~,~) : Status IFACU· I FAC I F.ACIN- . 'FAC- .1.__~ð,c:;.LJ+ i Stratunl 13 15 . '1 11 T~. Non-Dominant Plants % ! -EÚã-i"LJS" i" StrElturrï I I i i 60 140 . .' ! ~O ! 20 : 20 ·1 I , I '. __on_______...._ I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I Vegetation Strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are 08l, FACW, and/or FAC: Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? No '. I Mé:Ürix Coior ! Gle ing , Mottle Colors .. . "TexturelStrü-c-t"ü-r-e--- - -.. . .. ._-_.~- -----~.. - ---- - --.... . . .. ---" ---.. ,.--. , . , in -......-:.....:..-----.--- -..~..---.... ___J --. .---- ..,. .__ _._._n_.____....n On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking Concretions Are the soils hydric? No Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is Wetland hydrology present? No Are Wetland soils present? No Is the plant community a wetland? Rationale for jurisdictional decision No None of three criteria present at sampling point. COMMENTS: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Stake: 1W Date: Transect #: 3 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.3 Routine Onsite Determination Method Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: R1 UB Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/27/04 Appl icanUOwner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Vegetation ¡. D-b~miñaRt"Piärït·,. ---:-:--. ~ ..-..,...., '}(~-'- ~~tãtus' . 'r Stratum Non-DominantPlants i"Yo ¡ StatLs Stratum !. Pha/aris:arundinaèea I 80 I ,FACAW ¡ 5 Asclepias speciosa 5 ¡ FAG LAc~n~~g_t.~~9....:____.~... :_.._....._,. __L~O _-l_F~_Ç_,!!~_..: ~._._. ..c_~!.~1É!"'q§ia tri[~rJ...?.._.. ._.__.___ _._?.. _L£ð_Ç.~_____~__ ;.___ . n.__" .._____._ _____ .:. .._ L..· _._~_~. .._Ln_. . _ ___-'-_.__._... n.._~_.__.._n__. _._._1.. -.---.---:- Vegetation strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? Yes Soils 'Oe" tii O(ii'-··ir;ches)/Horizon . .'~-'" ¡ -~"atrix GOIÕ'f ....n --¡Gle - inõ-' Mottle Colors' -- Texture/Structure .:..~:.Lq·r..A~~·n.... _ .n._-"-~~... .__..__. 1º_Y~~.l1._ .~__ _.____.......___.____.._ __...~h9._<!...~Y_..E.!a.y_' ~~-1 ~L~_," ~~~.C~:::m~·1 ~i~GY ~ -:. -~:L~:~m - i~;:~-~~~~') . ·lJ1!~~~~aj~~~= : _.J x On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking x Concretions Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches X Water marks Sediment deposits x Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves ~ Local soil survey data ~ FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Is Wetland hydrology present? Yes Are Wetland soils present? Yes Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Rationale for jurisdictional decision Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin No.3 Transect #: 3 Stake: 2U Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: R1 U B Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/27/04 Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Vegetation :Dom ihånfÞlâi1t· : Andropogon. gerardíí : Z_e_<! ~7!~Y~___ __. _: l$tátUs· Stratum ! F AC- : 5 : NI ' 1 NÔr;':'bÒrrITnâñfÞlàhfs '}~1 SfâiLÚ:¡' ... StretLim i ~.'~: i 50 I GO ------r-' - ...----.-. ..~...__._--_. .... ... -- -. -....-...... ... . -- .. . .__.____..._n_. ..------ .... ...-- ....-. --. ...-.--..-."..- Vegetation Strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 0 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? No Soils I bf3þfh (in irìcl18s)/Hor.izon. Matrix Co'or :.Jt1]jA~__n.. __._ .______.__ i 10YR 3/1 . 10·12/ AB . I 10YR 4/2 r-)2:rä}~~~~-'--- _:" ~ ~_ _:_-==---==~.- .: 1 OYR 4/4 : G!eying ¡ kicMe Colors u.L..__._ _.1 I ...-----.-. .. _..- . Texture/Structure .... _: L~_~~'y.~I.~y . _ . .....n.__u --_I ........... ~_ Ç!~y_ ____ __ . n .... _ .___________. . _._..§andy_c~y .. .~_. ._ ._.._.___... . -. .-----. ... -". .-. . - ... - - ......-. .-..- .-. On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking Concretions Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits _ Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data F AC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is Wetland hydrology present? No Are Wetla(1d soils present? No Is the plant community a wetland? No Rationale for jurisdictional decision I I I I I I I I I II .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.3 Transect #: 10 Stake: Wet Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PF01 AlB Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/27/04 ApplicanVOwner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Yeø~!~~~~.______ i Dominant Plant ; Carox sp'; 40 ¡--~f;;;:~=~Z;0.~ï!t·,m- -_~-..~-:-.. -~-~.-J ·.~·i{~ --,--.-----. Non-Dominant Plants %) Poa palustris 10 Phalaris arundinacea 10 Status : Stratum FAC 5 F ACW . 5 Status ; Stratum 5 : . FAC\¡V- '1 ._~~. --. .--.-----'. J..EÞ.-C'!Y..__. ...ª. ..---------. -. .. - . ... . ------.. .- --. .".. .---.. . ..----... ...... -.--" _ . .. __...a . .. Vegetation strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? Yes Soils 15iI§)&i~tl1 (in inches")lHorizon I Matrix Color ï 0.101 A' . . '.' ¡ 1 OYR 2/1 1._. ,_,____,.__... .... .,." . .. _m . ..____. 110.~18-¡:B .'. I 5/5GY ¡_._:~__~---==-~===____.~n..~-- ."":.. .: '_-.'-_-] n.. ¡ ~1.~Yin~ ..i r~:ottl~..~olor~_._"". . ~_~~~~;~~'~C~~:.~._...___J !._'(e~ _.... : . _. ._. _ .__~§.~J:..I_c1Y~~_n________. ..--, . u.n. .._ ..__n.. . u_____.,_,. _. -----...---. --.¡ ! -... .. ... -.--.--- ... --. -.-- .-. .-. - .. ...-.... .. . - .... .--. .--.----.----,-- . . .._,_...... . .. ..------ . - . _.. .__n. . x On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking x Concretions Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches X Water marks Sediment deposits x Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves x Local soil survey data x FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Js Wetland hydrology present? Yes - assumed based upon indicators Are Wetland soils present? Yes Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Rationale for jurisdictional decision Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.3 Transect #: 10 Stake: Up Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PF01A1B Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/27/04 Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Vegetation : Dominant Plant ! % . Zea mays ',' , GO : ~~d.r.oJ?þ'go~!.~_cpp.!Jril!.~_ ._ _ . :~_ 4,0 _.:.._ ________~ . '._____ _. ____I Non-Domihant Pltlnts . % I Status I StrAtum I . .. ';- -:----,...:....-·---·f-·· . - ..¡ . .L _.__.__ __ ... .._ .".. , Status Straturn . NI' i 5 : NI ' . ..--J.5 .L~-~:_~ --:-. 1--'-'.' ..._ __ . ~_ _______ _~._ _M.___ . __.___ ..---- . -.---- ______.._._n Vegetation Strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? Yes i Gle in, Motllo Colors ___.._ ...:.._:_. _._ L.. .. . I .-r-----! 5YR--3J3 i ..._- .-----. ¡ Texture/Structure -~ !. L_o a r:n Y_l?..I ~.Y._ _.. .. _ ~_.___ -'- . _. .. .:_..f._!~.Y...nn_.._ .__._:________.__ __ _ ._ ªa.~~_y_.~~y',.~__: .______n.._. _ . ., I.. . _ ... _... . i i Matrix Color ---...... ------ -- . ---------- . I __. _____._ .. ... -- -- . .... .---.-. ....... x On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking Concretions Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves x Local soil survey data. FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is Wetland hydrology present? No - assumed based upon indicators Are Wetland soils present? No Is the plant community a wetland? No Rationale for jurisdictional decision I I I I I I I I II , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546..7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin No.3 Transect #: 14 Stake: Wet Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEMB Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/27/04 Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen No Yes Yes - area was planted but is currently denuded of vegetation Vegetation : Dominant Plant . denucfed ' ! Status % , .----,_... --.... .-- ! Status : Stratum 100 S:raturn ,: 5 Non-Dorr-inant Plants 01 I 10 .._.__.__ ._____ . __".. ... ·-_.__0·. _.._....______. ..J~~.~.'-- ~~~ .....:~~~.~~ --~-------.---.- .--...--..... . -·-------1 u ; I ·_.u_._.... ~ ...__ u_u_ . J L. n_.. ...-. ..-.---- .--------.. .. -. ... Vegetation strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAG: 100 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? No --area denuded of vegetation Soils : Dep.th (in inchos)¡Hor.TZOrl·-~ Matrix Color : O~3.1 ' '.: 10YR 612 1- . ..--- -" ..-- --...- M._ --- ---. .---. .- , 9;;18 1 AI? '.' . 3/N I..· . :...- -~~_--- _"'~_-_:..-'~ - .-~~. ...=~~--~~- - .'.~;~~.~-- _ _. u_. : Gleying ,J Mottle Colors I T"exture/S"tructüre ..--. -- .: : .,' ! I Sand . " ¡ -- -: - -..-------; ....-- -. . ----- -.. . - 1-- -.--.: --------. -. - . --. -- -.--.1 .~~ fN:~_::f '/, :-~d!S_C~=:=::~t: :~m~!aL~c-~:_:~:::1 x On Hydric soils list Histosol x Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking Concretions Histic Epipedon x Sulfidic odor Sand has been deposited on the landscape since being planted Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation _ Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks l Sediment deposits ~ Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves x Local soil survey data FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes - denuded of all vegetation Is Wetland hydrology present? Yes - assumed based upon indicators Are Wetland soils present? Yes Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Rationale for jurisdictional decision Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin No.3 Transect #: 14 Stake: Up Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEMB Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/27/04 Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen No Yes Yes - area has been planted in corn Vegetation 1--'-- --.., . --- ; Dominant Plant I Zea mays i ,';(, ; siätus' ï Stré-1tl;rii' Non~"öorT\iriarit Plarits ..-.. i '~~,-'" ¡ StatLIs"-; "StréillJi,Cj 75 ! 5 ! i ,- -. .-. --...--'-----.. ... -. ---- - . ! - - ___n -~= f..-.~_: _.__ ____. _.. -.-..------... .._.__ ".___._.____ n.____.. .___0.___ . , , - --... .nn.o··___·· ..-.. . -- Vegetation strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW I and/or FAC: 100 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? No Soils , be th(ininches)!Horizon tviéllrix Color Inº__9J'Ap.<·' ." . .' ' .! _1_0.Y~ ~/3 I 9·18 '/ g. . . . 10 YR 5/3 C~~~-:-_ ' ~-~~__.:- :'~--'=~~'-~"~-=--!-' .., ! Glè¡nC rv10itle Colo:'s . Texture/Structure' " : LO_~~ï cl~_y_~___: -:---,-.1 L .~C?Êmy",!?lay~.____._. __.' , I. ; "--------1" í _~~__ -=~.-l... .-- - .....- . -.---..--.,. ----! . ..-.---------..... . --.. -----. .-- On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Organic streaking Concretions Reducing conditions High organic content Sand has been deposited on the landscape since being planted Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data _ FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is Wetland hydrology present? No Are Wetland soils present? No Is the plant community a wetland? No Rationale for jurisdictional decision I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.4 Transect #: 1 Stake: Wet Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEMB Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/28/04 Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Vegetation [ Òorninãï,t:pïant n__',___nn~.._.._ Î tX; ,Status I StraLJnl : Acer neguncfo . I 50 ;--~ml~~~~;~;;~m-~:~:·~=::~~"---·.I ~~ __:' T._._~~~~::j .~~~..-- i '-:1.:0 ~ Status, ~ 20 Non-Dominant Plants Carex sp Stratum 5 ....______ ..... .. .. ....______.___._ ..... ... .__._n .. _ ..n. .. ... .....-----.--.- --- . ....----.-----. .. ----....-.---.----. Vegetation strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? yes Soils . . Öe" ih' . in, im:tlCs.)lHQrizon j O~9JA1"- , . " i 9-1 ä:fA2 ~-.:....-..- _u_u___ . "-I Matrix Color 1 OYR 2/1 1 OYR 2/1 i Gie'· ing , Mottle Colors ¡ Texture/Structure " 'Clavloam ¡ I.:~ñ;y cläy .----... . ! ' .1 m'_~__'1 . I _ ________1 i. ; .---.- -- . . 10YR 6/1 . 1%· faint i--· .-..----.---------""----.. --.----.-------- ... . .----- - . ...-.-.--.---- - --.- ..-..-... - -.. . . . . . [~-~.-.~~.:-_::_~- - -' -- :--.-~:.-----' ---... --.-------.- --~ -. ._._~---_._.__._.. . _. __no . .. .. - ----- ---- -.---.--.....-.-.... - x On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking Concretions Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits x Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves x Local soil survey data x FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Is Wetland hydrology present? Yes - assumed based upon indicators Are Wetland soils present? Yes Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Rationale for jurisdictional decision Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.4 Transect #: 1 Stake: Up Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEMB Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/28/04 Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No ¡ Strmum 15 Status I' . . I : Non-Dominant Plants % ¡ Status S:ré1tulll 0/ 10 . , ~_._---- ....---.-- ._-.... ._- ----- --_. .---- ..-¡- -. _ -- -.... _ __1··_' _. ._. ..._1 .........n. . _ ... .1... .... --- - - --...- -... .,.---- --- . .. - - - Vegetation Strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 0 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? no Soils .De' tho (in inches /Horizon '.' . ~_---....:._..:.____~_..:..~'.' i I ..' . . :. I Ic-:...._·:-:-:-:-_·_·_-~n..----..-_- .._.._-_.._~,. . I Gle in I .. I . ... .n··_~I.~::==_.1 ; I i...1atrix Coior rdottle Colors ! Texture/Structure -_._--¡---~..-_..:...._.._-_....- ._-_..~.---_. ,.. --.-----.. __n_._ I p.. _ _n__.___..__ .._ ___._._ .. .... __.______p , . , . . n_____ __. _ _ I "__._. _"."._. . __ ___no. "__ ____ ._n on - -.---- .. --------. .----.. On Hydric soils list Histosol Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Reducing conditions High organic content Organic streaking Concretions Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data FAC-Neutral test definite vegetation transition at boundary Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is Wetland hydrology present? No Are Wetland soils present? No Is the plant community a wetland? No Rationale for jurisdictional decision I I .-¡ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka. Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.5 Transect #: 5 Stake: Wet Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEM/SS1 B Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/28/04 Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Vegetation : Dpm inant Plant (~'Ó j Pht;¡laris arundimicea , 95 ~..=~/~~~X~~Lla_,~_.. :.=_ ..___. ..:_~.'~__ _Jn2~~ Non-Dominant Plants n -;- (~.; -T"iStatus': : Strat-um Urtica dioica : 1 0 i FAC.;. I 5 Ambrosia tritida· i '> ~ F AC+ '5 -,---- - ·-1·'::· r-·· .. "..-- . .-.,- .. ,. --..2- _ .1 __ .__ ! ... _... ¡Status : S:ratum ! FACW . I 5 I n L.Qª-~ . -_ .---1 ~- I n.'; I nul . --. -. ..-"..- -... .. ____. Vegetation Strata: 1 == Tree; 2 == Sapling; 3 == Shrub; 4 == Woody Vine; 5 == Herbaceous; 6 == Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? Yes Soils !Depth(in,¡nches)IHorizon : Matrix Color jGleyirlg Mottle Colors ~~,'~~~-9S1Âi_-'_ ~~_=.~~.__ - . _~~.... - :: =-~·U ~.~~~a-. = . - n~. 4/N -.-. --h~.5YR 2: 5/4 t~..·-_: ~~._~n~_-_:.._-.. ---~~ _.~-~~: __I .__. .~.. .~---__" _:-. _ - .:-<~-_ '~~~~'. ·:-.l~~:··~u_-_~-~: .---__.__. ! T extu reiStructure-"-.--- n. :.. L~amy claL .____.. .-~._..:J ! Clay ... . ¡ ..---. ..-.. -'---.-.-- .--....---... -----, I . . i --r" ..----.-- --.-----..-.---. --~ ._. ___ __ ___ n_ ______ ._. _ ____ . x Local Hydric list Histosol Aquic regime Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor x Gleyed/low chroma x Reducing conditions High organic content other Organic streaking Concretions Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits x Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves x Local soil survey data x FAC-Neutral test Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Is Wetland hydrology present? Yes - assumed Are Wetland soils present? Yes Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Rationale for jurisdictional decision ..._--"- ---------.-- - -.""" . i. . ______.. . .__n_ ----.-- --. "- --------- ." - ""-..-....- -" . I I I I I I I I I Ii I I I I I I I I I Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.5 Transect #: 5 Stake: Up Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEM/SS1 B Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/28/04 Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Vegetation : Dõí1;iiíàrìt.Plarif : Soybeans ,. . i (~';J '.SÙÙLJS Stratum ! 80 [j - j ·u. -- -....---.- . .,_. ...------- N6n-DÒrrlinarit Plants '. % ¡status . Str2tur.l I ¡. ___..n. -.. _-c. ___m _ _ .. ------.- --- -+ -. _ ~.._-_.-- I .. __ u... __....I... " -- -"""- -. --"--_.""".. .._.__"___n____n.". ._" Vegetation Strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? Yes '. .: ; r..,1atrix Color ___ _.. : 10YR 4/3 : 10YR 4/2 ! Gle ill ";.·_==~I Mottle Colors ; . fexture/Structure' . : CI~ loam' . I n' -J ~I.~_i::__. ~==~~_~:~~'~_,_~=:-I ! ~ . "__ "";__"_"""__ n_" """_ _ __ ."_..__".._"_" ¡ ,_ -""·_"_·"·"-------_0--- "."... . """.---. _ Local Hydric list Histosol Aquic regime Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Gleyed/low chroma Reducing conditions High organic content other Organic streaking Concretions Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: NA Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data FAC-Neutral test Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is Wetland hydrology present? No Are Wetland soils present? No Is the plant community a wetland? No Rationale for jurisdictional decision I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.6 Transect #: 3 Stake: Wet Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PF01 B Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/28/04 ApplicanUOwner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Vegetation bomirianLPlant·, ,. . ! % ¡ Status ! Stratum ~ Salixnigra·: . 40 OBL. j 1 L l!.!...'"Œus .~.f!ieciqan?_.· :~_:_ .---.--..1. 35l. __~_FAf'!'/'::"'. .-1-..1 "__. L.~I1_~élr~~_aruQQjn0?!!a _ _._.n.. .. .J_ 4º-._ _1._E..A_(?flL-:'. .t.? .._. Non-Dominant Plants' [ (1'0 .-¡. Stät"u·s-· Quercus macrocarpa ! 10 ¡ FAC- . _~!l!!.~!§_ ~P: _.___ .. __.___. ! __9 . 1 :4 r-- ----" ----.. _,_.__ . _,__.. .:. __ _ ,.___i.. _n. _..~J Vegetation strata: 1 ::: Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 ::: Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? Yes Soils ..De tll Iii· inches)iHorizon. . i Matrix Color 0-4{M/ .", .. .. .... , i 10YR 3/2 4:+0 TA2'-,~ .-.~-.., --- -.--- . .. ..--: .,OVR4/2--· JA~~_~-·)~~-·:::".~~: ~.--:-..... "'~-~~:-~5j f~Y~ ~!.~~ .. ¡ Gie ino 'Mottle Colors __ ¡__. _ _n.......1 _,___. -.'~·l-=·. :-:=~::~?~~YR ~/5u._._... .___J. _.___. .__. . : UTexturë¡S'trüCture' -.----- . ..L~oa~._..,-_ .u_..._._____ .__.~~~al'!!y..cl~L_. . ____:..._.___ .: C!.~ï.:_. - .--- -- ----_ -----.----i ~ Local Hydric list Histosol Aquic regime Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor x Gleyed/low chroma Reducing conditions High organic content other _ Organic streaking x Concretions Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? Is the soil saturated? No Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation No Surface water depth: Depth to Saturation: NA NA Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches x Water marks Sediment deposits ~ Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves x Local soil survey data x FAC-Neutral test Exposed roots and widened buttresses Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Is Wetland hydrology present? Yes - assumed Are Wetland soils present? Yes Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Rationale for jurisdictional decision I Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd, Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.6 Transect #: 3 Stake: Up Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PEM/SS1 B Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? -.'." :~',,'---' :'':--__-----~.~.~_._-.--- :~·_·~·:."._I. __:~ ! -- -- "--"I' . . I I I I I I I 9/28/04 Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Vegetation Dominant Plant Soybeans ! Ambrosia trifida t . - ----.-------.-.--. - .. ! Cirsium'Ellvense . ......... ___ i oil i 10 140 I 40 20 . Status. I I !. F.:Þ.-_º~_,,___.. 5 i FACU I 5 Stíuturn Non-Dominant Plants -:--~;¡:---: Status .".. S:ratuill- i I ~ I ~) Vegetation Strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 40 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? No Soils : Depfli(iriir,cheS)/Horizon I iv18trix Colo' 1·"q:8:/_~P. .---.". ..--..---: 10YR4/3 ! ~~1.~__~==~=.=.':.~,,:.:~:===-~: 10YR 4/2 , ;Gl8yÌllg i.,-1ottle Colors Tcxture/StrUcture ; Clay"loam' . .,... ·1 ¡ . Clä"y"-' . """.-----. - -~.. .. -,,' - -'-'--1 I. .... __ _," __..__o__________..._onn_----¡ _._._u__.____. __ I I i ___ .1-. __.__, I ' I ' ":--~--.-.- i . ·---·"L"·-.-·.._ ------.------ _ Local Hydric list Histosol Aquic regime Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Gleyed/low chroma Reducing conditions High organic content other Organic streaking Concretions II I I I I Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? No Depth to Saturation: Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation NA NA Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data FAC-Neutral test I Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is Wetland hydrology present? No Are Wetland soils present? No Is the plant community a wetland? No Rationale for jurisdictional decision I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546-7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin NO.6 Transect #: 12 Stake: Wet Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PF01 B Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/28/04 Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Vegetation Dominant Plant ! (}h ¡ Status ; Stratum i Salix",iigra... ¡50 ; .OBL. 1 :__0_?p'§itie.!?~ ~caPß_Œ~i8;_.___._m..__ '_" -1--3°---- .£~ÇV~L_ mL 5__ . .__. L. P..~!a~arJ...s... ar~{QçiinéJ..~_'?_é!· . ___. . ___jO _. L_F~CvY.+__15 __... __._ Non-DomirÏänt -¡:J,ä'ñì;--- -' f'- oia '-TStäÚ:ïs-' i Sti:'atlirrl i I , .--.---.. ... ..-~___. .______......:__. .1___. .. ........_.. ...._. ,..._. .---. -..-..---_____. _.______......1..__ ..~. __... .____.._L_. ___._J Vegetation strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 ::: Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? Yes Soils L Dep'th (in inches)/Horizo[1 . ¡ Matrix Color : Gieying . Mottle Colors : TextureJStru'ctu're---" I µ'. 0-1Jll.L.._ ........:......__~._~_:. ·_~_·.._..:--'..1ºY~_ 211 .__ ._.. ___.1.---- _~! .·'.5'(~_6l8 .____: .Loa~_~.I~ï.._ "'__n ... ...-___---J . .. I . I _ .-.--_.-._-_ 'i".-.-. ._ .-.-__-.__..~.__ ._--. n___. .__..._---....-__--__.. ··-_-_··.·._...1" t~~~~-:--=:_~ <::H=~--L -_~n--~~ ~ ~_~t-n_~=L_-~-__ H L__ ____ __ _~ x Local Hydric list Histosol Aquic regime Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor x Gleyed/low chroma Reducing conditions High organic content other Organic streaking x Concretions Hydrology Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: NA Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to Saturation: 14 Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches x Water marks Sediment deposits x Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves x Local soil survey data x FAC-Neutral test Exposed roots and widened buttresses. Soil saturated at 14 inches in late September. Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Is Wetland hydrology present? Yes - assumed Are Wetland soils present? Yes Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Rationale for jurisdictional decision Schoel! & Madson, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners Soil Testing Environmental Services 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 1, Minnetonka, Mn 55305 (952) 546·7601 Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin No.6 Transect #: 12 Stake: Upland Routine Onsite Determination Method Date: Field Investigator(s): Terrance Jeffery Project Number: 64000-276 Project Site: Fox Property Plant Community / Name: PF01 B Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Is this a Problem wetland? 9/28/04 I I I I I I Applicant/Owner: County: Carver Lundgren Brothers City: Chanhassen Yes No No Vegetation . Domit:ìémt Plant I %)..-. -:StaiLïs-~'aturn , Sa/íx nigra. 25 o.BL '1 ...jug/ans GÍ'1!'J(ea· n__.___n___._.._.i 30 :_~Þ.-~l!~__.I. 5 : Tilía americana :\0 'F/~CU I fj : lÐ¡:;tiJ.9_àl~!~i.im~riË.~i.i~i:~~:-=~ 3.5 1,:·:F~AACÇQ~~:-~.:~j .~. .... ~.A.!7er!iong qU!!1quefC?li~ _ .. .. . _20 oJ Non-Dominant Plants Ribes amerícanum ,.;~) : Status Strémat1 ... -. .---.- I n..__. _ _ . _ ! -.-..-.-- . . ...- . i I '10 I FACv-.¡· 5 !.:--~...-.-:~:.~·I..-- ~ i ... ... .._ ... __ . . ___.__ __. n .: ..__u. ....__.._.__!.. ! I I I I . ..-.--- ....- "... .... Vegetation Strata: 1 = Tree; 2 = Sapling; 3 = Shrub; 4 = Woody Vine; 5 = Herbaceous; 6 = Bryophyte Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 30± Is the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? No Soils iOeplfî{iniiÎêhÓS}/Hc5riiÕri ·1 tdrltrix Color ¡ 0-3JA' . 10YR 4/2 !·-~H)Iê..~ -.~-_ :_:.:=:=. _~ ._.... ...- .__ 110Y~ $i4 Q~~}_~~ !?~Iow_ 12" .. .. n..._n _ J t-....1otUe Colors :têXruf8¡stfUtWhr' . . , : Loam . u._~...u_u._....._____·._ _......._.. __. .__ - ._un_j _. . : _ Ç.I_~ y.nl_<>.~~·_ _. nn u. __ n.... __.~_n._.__1 , ..... ..I . I - --- ·-------·1 ... n._ Local Hydric list Histosol Aquic regime Histic Epipedon Sulfidic odor Gleyed/low chroma Reducing conditions High organic content other Organic streaking Concretions I Is the ground surface inundated? No Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Yes Depth to Saturation: Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole NA List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation NA 14 I I I I I I I I Hydrology Primary indicators Inundation Saturated in upper 12 inches Water marks Sediment deposits Drainage patterns in wetlands Secondary indicators Oxidized root channels Water stained leaves Local soil survey data FAC-Neutral test Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale Is Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is Wetland hydrology present? No Are Wetland soils present? No Is the plant community a wetland? No Rationale for jurisdictional decision CER'llflCA1ICN ~'::r,:~lfþ.~OO 'f~1:rp::'¡;·~::"~h~nl~~a o~~'ì~~=t~~O~ffr~~t~~)Cll:"·d ~:;~t)'F~:U~~~O~' the Fo( Tru.t. that thl. Is 0 Mlrw)' of: Scetlon Twenty- Three (23), Township One ... That p«tlon of the South half of the Southwnt Quart.... of County. I.4lnnnoto; Mdch IIee wntorly ot the foßowlng ~ 111'1« B.glnnln'il ot the south quart.. of saId s.ctIon 23; thenct Nn west on an azimuth of 271 degr"8 .5ð minutes 13 HConds along the ~th Ilns of eold Section 23 for 1634.23 ,Nt to 0 point; thence on on ozImuth of 00 d.- 043 mlnut.. 2-4 MConœ for 500.11 fNt to 0 point thence on on o:rJmuth of 91 d.... 5& minutes 13 MÇOntb for 1173.4ð f.et to 0 point; thilnC4t on on ozlmuth of 2SI d~ 19 minut" 18 ..conda 'Of' 152.11 ,Nt to a point; thence on on o:lmuth of ~2 d.... 57 mlnut.. 23 HCon~ for 709.3ð ,..t to 0 poI'nt on the north 111'1. of aald South.œt Quo1.. at the Southwat Qucrtw; thence on on ozImuth of 91 degrea 23 minutes 02 HCOI'Ids olong th north Ilns of OQId South~t OJortllll" of the Southwnt Quart... for 475.37 'eet to th northeCtSt comer of !laId Southeœt Quart.. of ths Southwnt Quart... and thlre tonnInCltJru;. But ~tln'il ttJ.-.from the following: w..t, eo.- Range 23 8 North. of s.cuon 2J, Town.tllp The Northeœt Quart.. 01 thlll Southwest Quarter (NE " of SW ,,) .4undr~ Sbct..-. (116) North of Ran9111 T..,t)'- Thr.. (23) 'Nut N E S ." ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY Comm.,cln9 at the Southwnt comer of Sttc:tIQn 23. Townahlp 1160 Rong. 23; th.,ce runnln9 North on s.ctlon 11n. JO f..t: th...t:1II In 0 str(l1ght IIn. to 0 point on South Section IIn. of eald Section. JO feet Eo.t of the South_t.. com.. of IKIld SectJon; th...c. w.at 30 f..t to said South....t com... of sold SectIon and the ploce of beginning. beJng 0 thI"M corn...ed piece In South...t com... of See:tlon 23. Townlll11p 116. Rang. 23. and I. bONd ~on Informotlon found In the commltmont for tltl. InDUronce prlllpOl"ed by Stewart T1t1. Guaranty Compony, FII. NOL 108817 and 108B1B. dated .tfec:tJw AuVUllt 2&. 2004 ot 7:00 .....M.. and corroctly lII10n the location. of 011 bußdlnga., struct\lm or Improvements lllalbl. on IKIld proprty; thot th.... or-. no vlslbI. rights of woy or easemenb on ~Id d~ed property other than s,own or noted hereon; thot there are no porty wolls or visible encroad1menbi, an sold dnc:rlbed property by buildings. .tructur.. ar oth... Improwments oItuated on adjoining property .xcep~ (III shown or noted hereon; thot 011 eoøm...ta. If any, listed In Schedul. B on the h...oIn ref.-.need commitment for tm. In..ranc.. or. "own hw~: and that thbl mop and the eurYe)' on which It Is boNd "..... mod. (Q In occordonce wIth ~lnlmum Standard Detol Requirement. for ÞJ..TA/ACSN Land TltI. SUrveys,- jointly Htoblllh.d and odopt.d by AlTA. ASCW and NSPS In 1999. and Indud.. Item. 1. 2. 3. ... 8, 7(0). B. 9. 10. 11(0) of TabI. A thwRf and (8) pUl"Mlont to the Ace\lrocy Standard. (IS odopted by AlTA. NSPS ond ACSM and In effect on the dot. of th~ ctrtlfk:atlon, undngned furth.. cortlfl.. that proper ""'d proçtdurea. In.trum...tatlon, ond od~ot. aurwy p,",,"nlill ,"",e ","plo:,.d In ord.. to achl..... r.....lt. comparabl. to \hOlM! outlined In the ~lnlmum Angl.. DI.tanc. ond aow,. Requnmenb fOt' Survey Ueoaurem.,ta \II11lch Conb'oI Land Boundarln for þ!'TA/ACSM Land TltI. Surwys,- Dot. 01 Dote 01 2"'" OrIglnol Sll)noture: Octob... ... F1e1d SUrvey. October 1. 2004 I I I _ --=.~ .. __ .....ct37"W ~""'E Com" of SW ~wP&., ~1t( '3Il'. ~..'....... ....... .1 '/" s.ctIon" _1ii:>À . ~ 1- .~___ I- ~~ ".: . -- \ \ 1 __ \I,-';>'"'j &.. ..... ... ' \ --- "'~ "~,, -- \ "'_""ca<' _______I!LOO-" ¥"! \. PER .- .--= ...a, ~d1~1~ HJot> \ 'E1l.NI~' ../ N. 11n. of NE 1/'" of SW 1/.... , Donlel G. Nlded.. Land SUrve)'Or UN UC.,H No. 19839 GENERAL ItoIES ~~x,F~~:a~lpthl: ~t~ru~lF~a~:rotl:m"'~ a2~ö2~~I~ed2E-~~ O:~ ~'::: d~edon~tI~erf L)nn commltmenl 23 .... The City of OIonho...... ho. Indlcoted that the property shown on this survey mop Is In F100d Zone C (Ofeo of minimum flooding), according to Rood InDUranc. Rot. Uap Community Ponel No. 270051 0001-0010. published by the Federal Emergency Monag","...t Agency. .ffectl.... dote .Ally 2. 1979. , ~I. :~~~ ~:~:tc~~~::\:t;.flo~sl~:o~~~:;y;;~t::~ Indicated that the property shown an 5. Utßltles ahÇWf1 or-. from visible utnlty locations by SMI DUrvey crew. ÐccowUon. were not mod. during the procen of thl, survey to locat. underground utnltl.s and/or struc1u..... The locotlon of underground utmtle. ma)' vary from locations shown hereon ond oddltlonol under9l'ound utnTtlea ond/or structura may be encountered. Contact GophIK' State One Call Notiflc:otlon Center (800) 252-1166 for verification of utRlty t)pe and field locatIon prior to excavation. . under 6. Area of prfPorty. ....118.503 Sq. Fl (9....55 Ac. 7. Property hos acx:na to L)"'on Boulevard, public rlght-ot-ways. 8. Nam.. of adjoining ownora were provided by Corver County. 9. Th. field IlUrvey of thJa alte was completed on Slllptember 30. 20M. 10. The City or Chonhasaeen, h08 Indicated that tho property III currently 'Zoned A2 (Agricultural Estates) appllcabl. 'Zon~g regulotlons, and that the current setback. are: BU~:1:. 50 feet Side - 10 feet. Reor - 50 feet For addltlonat information contoct the planning department 1/2 23. I J ----HE Comer of S of SW 1/.... See: ,,--- ...... .~ '\ ..-J '~". ........ 475.40 _ .' sennn: (Az-91'23'02-) (Dnc-4ð7.37) No 'h. at the City of Chanha..en. ar conoldered during the procna of this DUrve)t ovemeod contain... or tocMIUea that may affect wwe not axamlned of underground or 11. SUbsurfac. and environmental conditione statement 10 made c:oncernlng the e)Clstence use or development of this property. 12. Totol num~CII' of o1rlped parking atoll: din It ern ~ ~~\ 1/2 '~ I I I -W 1/4 Cornw of SW 1/.... I / Soc: 23, Twp. 116, Rg. 23. I Carver Co. Uon / 1'=- - - ~ ~2- - - 5! ----r- --------\-T------------~ '....-'>HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER I Doc. No. 50332. I I I I I I I ~ ~ "'.. t .' ,;- ~¡¡¡ ;. !í ~~ ~ I ;e~ Z,_ § I '.....____-J:.- =,. ~""".-> ,;' ./ ::! is _ _ ./ ¡¡¡ . ( õ~ .0 "'.. ~r , /- \.............. ~.- ff on Monument Set Iron Monument round BitumInous Surfaco Concrete Surface Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Watermaln Gasmoln Under Ground Electric LInes Under Ground Telephone Llntll! Owr Head Unes Chain Unk Fence Solid Metal Fenco Wrought Iron Fence Curb And Gutter Dellnloted Wetland Section 23, Townahlp 116, Range: of Southw..t Quarter site. of the 2. Addntu 011 property; Unanl9"ed, all noted on 3. For the purpOH 01 this eurvey. the South hOIl an aseumed beorfng of S 88'03'-40- E. I' I a; '" ~ ~ Iii ;s -I 6 ..\t& 1/4 Jlne of NE SW '/" W. of ------- \ / " " \ " '- ,,, -...... ........ ) , ......... ,..U s , I I l --N. line of SE 1/2 of SW 1/'" See: 23. ii 1- ..\t& tþ 6/ -# ..\t& / ,. and elevation) LEIIÐID o - Denotes . - Denotes ~ - Denotes ~ - Denotes -----ss----- - Denotes -----ST----- - Denotes -1- - Cenotes ----~---- - Denotes ----..£----- - Denotes -----1----- - Denotes -----ott----- - Denotes _____ - Denotes c c - Denot03 - - Denotes - Denotes - . - - Denotes [!!] - Denotes ð. - Denotes Handicap Parking Stoll -Ó- - Denotes Fire Hydrant þQ - Denotas Gate Valva )!( - Denotes Light Pole /ã) - Denotes Sanitary Sower Manhole (l) - Denot08 Electric Manhole @ - Denates Woter Manhole ® - Denotes Telephone Manhole <;) - Denotes Unknown Manhole @ - Denotes Storm Sewer Manhole A - Denotes Storm Culwrt GIll D - Denotes Cas Meter m - Denotes Cas Valve 1MN18I - Denotes Electric Transformer EII@ - Denote:!: Electric Meter . . - Denotes Catch Bo,ln t'3 - Denotes Post Indicator Valva c:cMN Ð _ Denotes Utility Riser .Q - Denotes Stand Pipe GP 0 _ Denotes Guard Post .a - Denotes Utility Pole & - Cenotes SoU Boring (with noms CHtt _ Denotes Electric Hond Hole m Pt.4 _ Denotes Parking Meter o - Denotes Trafflc Signal Pole ~ ~2: _ Denotes Existing spot Elevation BENCHIIARIC 1FORMA1ION 1. TOP NUT OF HYDRANT ON NW CORNER OF LYMAN BLVD ANO POWERS BLVD AS SHOWN: ELEVATlON-920.61 FEET (NGVD 1929' encumber no .... (regular _ O. handicapped - 0: tie commitment 108818. Doe. No 299869. site: number 10 0' 13. The F1nol Certlflcoto the property. ." ) . . \ "- ~'. . ~d'--. ,,\ 1.... Docum.,t No. ðOJ32 IIste(l In Item number 9 of tlOe cornmltmont 108818 don not .,cumber the property. 1S, The Ditch agreement dated September 26, 1916 and flied September 20.191& I Book F of Ulaçl., Po",e 631 III undefined os to IOC:atlon and therefore hi not $hown hereon. ~ ii- i- 2. OIMPLE OF S 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23 AS SHOWN: ELEVATlON-883.90 FEET (NGVD 1929 w:N1Y MAP r ~ f:'f' ~'H.t:k:!.> ~ o! ~ 1....... -, ."" 1173.... saro.1"WE <_"'56'\3") " ,-- I 3. OIMPLE OF W 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23 AS SHOWN: ELEVATlON-892.31 FEET (NGVD 1929). dl 1 SIÄIE OF IINNESCJI'A (Az-271"56'IJ-) ------ 1634.23 NB8'OJ'46"W 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Eo IIn. of NE I I 1/4 of SW 1/....---...._ 1 1 \t& , I I" !II' I 1 I g§ I I wI': ....1 1 §!is:œ / II!r 1 1 "'....¡¡; I I ~~~ / '- 1 ",f::~ I .0,....'-...1 I I" 1-1 ... . I 'r" / , . I I / -.7..~------+ r-1-7--~~~ . I 1/ / I u,.. \ .Y.-" //1' 1 '. 1 1 " // 1 1 /./ II '-.~--- 1 1 /. 1 I " ',-- S. line of NE 1/'" I I . --- 1 of SW 1/4. 1 I \ 1 I ---~ e ,\ \ I '--N. line of SE of SW 1/.... I I I I I I I I I I I I J I -Jr- - / / 1 ., of See. 23.--~ 1/4;;::" County Non. I ...' r- -- I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I L=-~~ - -Ch -i~ ill '/4 í 1 / , '---s. Une of SW of Soctlon 23. SEE DETM. - -.... /, , I '. \ r. \. / ". J ' '004.,. ,/,/ saro.1"WE / - - 1tJWN " aJUfIR'( HCIIIES 1 \----SW Comer of Section 23, Corvor Co Non A -- " 1 " \ , I ( '7~ \ (/ SW Com:....;,-;.~:·DO / , ''''~: ~~.Sðc ~ T;:: ~~' / ,,(STONE) ,/ ..... ..... ......, ." DETALA .,,-' " / / / 30.00 -.;:-- ...... ", WEI:il LwacIaren &roe. Con8tructIon t35 E. WaYZGta Bhd Wayzata.... 55381 PROJECT NO. 64000-276 S.M" LOCA1l0N Peri of the SW 1/4 of SectIon 23- TownthTp 111. Range 23- CcnIr Ccuaty. UN ..r . '"' I..JU CERllFlCA liON l_y-uly_lllloourwy_ rr:1 und.- my .......... and lIIat .;:: ; ~~..=. undIr IIHI 1hIa dr'awtI9 ..... _ _ and .....- 11110 _ day of .20_ by REVISIONS OO~@1e1UL ~ IMJtê\I!»OOIM. DIM©. ÐlGIIEERS · SUR\IE'/ORS · PLNI4ERS _ SOI."ŒS1IIQ · EN\IIRONIIENTAL SEJMCES lœao WAYlATA IIOUI£VARD. SUItE 1 IItI£IIN(A, IIN e5Jœ (VS2) ~71101 FAX:(852) ~11085 2 \S . . .