Loading...
PC Staff Report 08-19-2014PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the subdivision re- platting Villages on the Ponds 81i Addition; and Site Plan Review for a one - story, two- building, 13,654 square -foot retail center subject to the conditions of the staff report and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting Subdivision approval to replat Villages on the Ponds 81' Addition, and Site Plan Review for a 13,652 square -foot, two - building retail center, The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen. LOCATION: APPLICANT: 460 Lake Drive (Lot 1, Block 1, Villages on the Ponds 8th Addition) Solomon Real Estate Group Steve Johnson 1508 Welland Avenue Minnetonka, MN 55305 (952) 852 -2339 stevei ohnsonAsolomonre.com VOP I, LLC 6ku, Vemelle Clayton 551 W. 781i Street P. O. Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 975 -0444 vemellegvisi.com PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: ACREAGE: 1.86acres Mixed Use DENSITY: F.A.R. 0.22 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 2 of 12 PROPOSAL /SUMMARY The applicant is requesting Subdivision approval to replat Villages on the Ponds 8' Addition, adjusting the common lot line between Lots 1 and 2, and Site Plan Review for a 13,652 square -foot, two - building retail center. The surrounding property is all within the Villages on the Ponds development. To the north are Pond Promenade, a storm water pond and wetland area. To the east is the Community Bank building and a parking lot. To the south are Lake Drive and a vacant parcel planned for future development. To the west are Main Street and another vacant parcel planned for development. Sewer, storm water and water service is available to the site as well as small utilities. The site had been rough graded in conjunction with a previous phase of development. The proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the project's development design standards. Staff is recommending approval of the project subject to the conditions of this report. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivision Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Villages on the Ponds Development Design Standards BACKGROUND On October 28, 2002, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for PUD 95 -2, Villages on the Ponds 86' Addition, creating two lots and two outlots. The two lots are the site for the two -story bank office building (Community Bank) and the four -story commercial and apartment building. (The four -story commercial and apartment building was not built and is the site of the current proposal.) On October 14, 2002, the Chanhassen City Council approved Site Plan #2002 -7, plans prepared by Milo Architecture Group, Inc., dated August 2, 2002, for a two - story, 11,000 square -foot office and bank building with drive - through windows and underground parking facilities with a variance for the use of 16.1 percent EIFS and a variance for signage in excess of 20 feet in height. On October 14, 2002, the Chanhassen City Council approved Site Plan #2002 -7, plans prepared by Milo Architecture Group, Inc., dated August 2, 2002, for a street level commercial and upper level apartment building with a variance for 1.35 underground parking spaces per unit. On April 8, 2002, the Chanhassen City Council approved Site Plan #96 -11 File 2, plans prepared by Opus Architects & Engineers, Inc., dated 1/30/02, for a 41,522 square -foot expansion to the existing building, St. Hubert Catholic Community, and amendments to the Villages on the Ponds Design Standards. On September 23, 1996, the City Council approved PUD 95 -2, Villages on the Ponds, including a Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment from Office /industrial, Institutional, Residential Medium Density, Residential Low Density to Mixed Use - Commercial, High Density Residential, Institutional and Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 3 of 12 Office; Preliminary planned unit development for up to 291,000 square feet of commercial /office buildings, 100,000 square feet of institutional buildings, and 322 dwelling units; Rezoning from IOP and RSF to PUD, Planned Unit Development (final reading); and final plat dated "Received September 19, 1996" for two lots and ten outlots and public right -of -way. SUBDIVISION The applicant is re- platting the lots of Villages on the Ponds 8`h Addition to provide additional lot area to Lot 2, which will be Lot 1 of the Tenth Addition. No public improvements are being proposed. FEES The fees usually collected with the final plat are: Surface Water Management (SWMP) Fee — paid with the 8'h Addition Park Dedication fee — paid with the 8' Addition GIS fee: $25 (plat) + ($10 /parcel x 2 parcels) = $45 The City collected SWMP fees with the 8' Addition so no additional fees are required. Full park fees were paid at the time of the initial platting of Villages on the Ponds 8'h Addition. No additional park fees are due for the replat and no park fees will be due at the time of any future building permit in the 8`h addition. City water (WAC), City sewer (SAC) and Metropolitan Council sewer (Metro SAC) fees are collected with the building permit and are calculated based on the uses within the building. Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 4of12 GENERAL SITE PLAN /ARCHITECTURE The applicant is proposing a one - story, two - building structure with a covered pass - through area between the two structures. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size Portion Placement Entries are framed with columns and highlighted through the use of aluminum sun shades. Each potential tenant unit is emphasized by faux columns with decorative wall sconces. Material and Detail Building materials consist of dark brown brick, decorative concrete masonry along the base of the building, cultured stone in the columns, Exterior Insulation Finishing System (E.I.F.S) along the top of the building and aluminum storefront windows and doors. The use of E.I.F.S. is limited to 15 percent of the building's fagade. Staff estimates that 28 percent of the building fagade consists of E.I.F.S. The building's elevation must be revised to reduce the amount of E.I.F.S. Roof Design The roof material consists of brown, standing -seam metal roof elements at the corners and in the middle of the structure. The development standards for the project require that sloped roof elements shall be incorporated in all structures: A minimum 70 percent of roof area shall be sloped. Currently, approximately 34 percent of the sloped roof treatment is provided. The required roof elements can be accomplished by adding additional mansard or hip roof elements along the parapet, incorporating stepped parapet elevations, adding rounded parapets or the use of canopies. Roof top mechanical equipment must be screened. No wooden fences are permitted on the roof as a screening element. Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 5 of 12 Facade Transparency Over 50 percent of the first floor elevation that is viewed by the public includes transparent windows and or doors. Site Furnishing The developer is providing planter boxes and patio areas as part of the development. Additional benches should be provided as well as a bike rack. Loading Areas, Refuse Area, etc. An enclosed trash storage structure is provided in the eastern parking lot. The material should reflect the building design and materials. The trash enclosure should be shifted to the north so that the gates face to the north, rather than the south. Landscaping Minimum requirements for landscaping at The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen include 900 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, two landscape islands or peninsulas, and three trees for the parking lot. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Applicant meets minimum requirements for landscaping in the parking lot area. City ordinance requires that parking lot islands with trees to have a minimum inner width of 10 feet. The applicant is proposing a treed island in the parking lot, which is required, but does not meet the minimum requirements for inner width. The applicant shall revise the plans to meet the minimum requirements. Lot Frontage and Parking Location The proposed building fronts on Main Street and is set at the build -to line within the development. The parking is distributed all around the building with 38 percent to the rear of the building. The balance of the parking is provided on Lake Drive East, Main Street and Pond Promenade and Outlot A, Villages on the Ponds 51 Addition. Most of the parking within Villages on the Ponds is under cross - access agreements throughout the development. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 900 square feet >900 square feet Trees/ parking lot 3 trees 3 trees Islands or peninsulas/ arking lot 2islands /peninsulas 2 islands /peninsulas Applicant meets minimum requirements for landscaping in the parking lot area. City ordinance requires that parking lot islands with trees to have a minimum inner width of 10 feet. The applicant is proposing a treed island in the parking lot, which is required, but does not meet the minimum requirements for inner width. The applicant shall revise the plans to meet the minimum requirements. Lot Frontage and Parking Location The proposed building fronts on Main Street and is set at the build -to line within the development. The parking is distributed all around the building with 38 percent to the rear of the building. The balance of the parking is provided on Lake Drive East, Main Street and Pond Promenade and Outlot A, Villages on the Ponds 51 Addition. Most of the parking within Villages on the Ponds is under cross - access agreements throughout the development. Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 6of12 COMPLIANCE TABLE PUD Building Height 3 stories 40 feet Building Setback N - WE - 0' W- 0'S -0' Villase Shoppes at Chanhassen (13.652 sfl 1 story 29.3 feet N- 6'E -15' W- 12'S -13' Parking Stalls 211 stalls 261 stalls # (Retail 1/200 square feet — 4,122/200 = 21 spaces; Restaurant 1150 square feet — 9,512/50 = 190) (# 81 spaces on -site, 20 spaces on Main Street, 22 spaces on Lake Drive, 56 spaces on Pond Promenade and 82 spaces Outlot A, Villages on the Ponds 5"' Add.) Parking Setback N- 0'E -0' N- 9'E -0' W- 0'S -0' W- 92'S -10' Hard Surface Coverage 70% 90 %# Lot Area 15,000 square feet 1.4 acres # Hard surface coverage must average 70 percent over the entire development. Individual lots may exceed 70 percent site coverage. LOT 2 FIErnuneaT. . uesz sr LOT f O y a- r no y LAKE DRIVE EAST - - S ..•., Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 7 of 12 STREETS AND ACCESS The site lies within the Villages on the Pond Planned Unit Development located south of Trunk Highway 5 between County Road 101 and Great Plains Boulevard. The streets within the Villages development — Pond Promenade, Lake Drive and Main Street — are privately owned and maintained. The site is on the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Main Street and will be accessed via the existing driveway on Lake Drive. The applicant must obtain the necessary agreement for the shared access between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Villages on the Ponds Tenth Addition. Some of the sidewalk adjacent to the site is damaged and shall be replaced with the site improvements. Access to the site is via Lake Drive, which is a private street within the Villages on the Ponds project. At one time, underground parking was planned for the site including access to the bank building to the east. The developer shall provide the city with an acknowledgement from Community Bank waiving their right to access for their underground garage area. Cross - access and maintenance agreements were required as part of prior platting and must remain in effect. All the streets within Villages on the Ponds, except for that portion of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive up to Grandview Road, are private. Villages on the Ponds Association is responsible for the maintenance of these streets. The Association is working with city staff on developing a maintenance schedule for the development. The owners of the improvements adjacent to the sidewalks are responsible for their maintenance. GRADING /DRAINAGE The site was mass graded when the surrounding area was developed. The applicant proposes minor grading within the site to prepare the building pad and install the other site amenities. The grading plan must be revised to include proposed spot elevations on the patio on the northeast corner of the building on Lot 1 and the green area on the west side of Lot 2. Drainage The proposed design maintains the same overall drainage pattern with some minor alterations for flood protection and water quality treatment. Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Because this will not result in greater than one acre of disturbance, it does not need to meet the requirements set forth in the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program (NPDES Construction Permit). The plan set must still meet Section 19 -145 of City Code. The applicant or their representative shall assure that all required elements are included the following: 1. A detail of all best management practices. These can be found on our website. Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 8 of 12 2. Inlet protection on all existing catch basins downstream of the disturbance area and adjacent to traffic routing. This includes the catch basin which the system is intended to tie into as well as the four (4) catch basins near the entrance. 3. All turf areas shall have a minimum of 6 inches of topsoil placed prior to seeding or sodding. WETLANDS, BLUFFS AND SHORELAND This area does not lie within a shoreland district. No bluffs or wetlands are present on the subject property. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Under existing conditions, the entire site drains from north to south before entering the private storm sewer system of the Villages on the Ponds. This system routes drainage into a pond which discharges into Riley Creek. Lake Riley, a downstream receiving water, and Riley Creek where it leaves Lake Riley, are both impaired waters. Because this will not result in greater than one acre of new impervious, it is not regulated by the requirements set forth in the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program ( NPDES Construction Permit). The site must meet erosion prevention and sediment control requirements spelled out in Chapter 19 of the Chanhassen City Code. The applicant is providing rate control and water quality improvements through the installation of an underground filtration system. The provided model summary indicates that this system has been designed to provide storage adequate to treat a water quality volume of 1.1 inch of runoff from the new impervious surface. The model makes the assumption that all soils on the site are of the "D" hydrologic group. The Web Soil Survey indicates that the majority of the soils on site are "B" soils and have a seasonally high water table deeper than six feet below the surface. Unless the applicant can provide satisfactory evidence to the contrary, the model should be changed to reflect these soils. This has implications on pre - construction and post - construction runoff rates and volumes. Further, the applicant indicates that infiltration is infeasible due to D soils having a slow infiltration rate. However, B soils are very conducive to infiltration. The applicant also failed to consider any other volume reduction practices. The Minimal Impact Design Standards has a number of accepted practices for runoff volume reduction. While this site does not cross the threshold for triggering the NPDES requirements, the goal of anti - degradation and the forthcoming Riley- Purgatory- Bluff Creek Watershed District rules indicate that volume reduction would be strongly recommended. The MN Pollution Control Agency oversaw the Minimal Impact Design Standards development. The developed standards provide a number of volume reduction methods. The applicant must demonstrate the infeasibility of alternate methods of volume reduction to justify the absence of any volume- reducing management practices as is currently proposed. Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 9 of 12 The system will be private and will be maintained by a party other than the City of Chanhassen. To this end, an operations and maintenance manual, identifying required inspections and maintenance tasks as well as a schedule of these tasks, who will be responsible for these tasks and how they will be reported to the City for MS4 compliance, will be required. STORM WATER UTILITY The Surface Water Utility Charges are calculated based upon land use type and land area. Credits may be applied based upon storm water practices being implemented. Storm Water Utility Fees were collected with the initial plat. UTILITIES Public sanitary sewer and water main are within streets surrounding the proposed development and services are stubbed to the site. The proposed 8 -inch ductile iron watermain on the east side of the building shall be privately owned and maintained. The existing conditions sheet indicates that an underground power line is within the southwest corner of the site as well as a hand hole. It appears that the proposed building would conflict with these utilities. The existing electric boxes on the southeast corner of the site appear to conflict with the proposed site improvements. The developer shall work with the small utility companies to ensure that any conflicts are resolved. LIGHTING /SIGNAGE The applicant is proposing 27.5 tall lighting, square steel poles, with hooded light fixtures for the parking lot area as well as decorative wall fixtures for building lighting. The site lighting photometric plan shows that adequate levels of lighting are provided around the building. There are existing light poles along Main Street that are located within the sidewalk area. With the construction of the retaining wall in this area, the developer needs to make sure that these lights do not block the sidewalk. Wall business signs shall comply with the city's sign ordinance for the central business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the "street" front and primary parking lot front of each building. Separate sign permits are required for each sign. The applicant has conceptually shown signage for the building. MISCELLANEOUS Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. The building(s) are required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. Water supply for the fire suppression system must comply with NFPA 13 (specifically, see restriction/requirements for pipes under buildings). Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. Structure proximity to property lines and other buildings will have an impact on the code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to, Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 10 of 12 allowable size, protected openings and fire - resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. Detailed occupancy- related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss building proximity issues as well as plan review and permit procedures. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow painted curb will be required. The builder shall contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for specific areas. There are specific codes relating to the installation of underground water mains under buildings. The builder will need to submit specific plans to the Chanhassen Building Department and Fire Department for review and approval. A three -foot clear space must be maintained from fire hydrants. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the development subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Subdivision 1. Before the final plat is recorded the $45 GIS fee must be paid. Site Plan Building 1. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 2. The building(s) are required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. Water supply for the fire suppression system must comply with NFPA 13 (specifically, see restriction/requirements for pipes under buildings). 3. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. Structure proximity to property lines and other buildings will have an impact on the code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to, allowable size, protected openings and fire - resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. 5. Detailed occupancy- related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. 6. The owner and /or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss building proximity issues as well as plan review and permit procedures Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 11 of 12 Engineerin¢ 1. The applicant must obtain the necessary agreement for the shared access between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Villages on the Pond Tenth Addition. 2. Some of the sidewalk adjacent to the site is damaged and shall be replaced with the site improvements. 3. The proposed 8" ductile iron watermain on the east side of the building shall be privately owned and maintained. 4. The developer shall work with the small utility companies to ensure that any conflicts are resolved. 5. The grading plan must be revised to include proposed spot elevations on the patio on the northeast corner of the building on Lot 1 and the green area on the west side of Lot 2. Fire Marshal 1. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow painted curb will be required. The builder shall contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for specific areas. 2. There are specific codes relating to the installation of underground water mains under buildings. The builder will need to submit specific plans to the Chanhassen Building Department and Fire Department for review and approval. 3. A three -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. Planning 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The developer shall provide the city with an acknowledgement from Community Bank waiving their right to access for their underground garage area. 3. The material for the trash enclosure should reflect the building design and building materials. The trash enclosure shall be shifted to the north with the gates facing north. 4. The building elevation must be revised to reduce the amount of E.I.F.S. to 15 percent. 5. Sloped roof elements shall be a minimum 70 percent of roof area. Revise the building elevations to incorporate additional sloped roof features. 6. The developer should verify the placement of the light poles along Main Street to allow pedestrian passage. 7. Additional benches should be provided as well as a bike rack. Planning Commission The Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 August 19, 2014 Page 12 of 12 8. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to show the treed parking lot island with a minimum inner width of 10 feet. Water Resources 1. Prior to issuing a building permit, the hydrologic model shall be amended to include hydrologic soils group B unless adequate evidence can be provided showing that the USDA soil survey information is incorrect. 2. An operations and maintenance manual, stating anticipated inspections and maintenance and including the responsible party, the schedule of these activities and the methodology of reporting to the city, shall be prepared and submitted to the city for review and approval prior to issuing a building permit. 3. The applicant shall discuss potential opportunities for infiltration or volume reduction and incorporate where practicable to do so or provide reasons deemed satisfactory to city staff why these practices are not being proposed. 4. A detail sheet showing all proposed erosion prevention and sediment control best management practices shall be included with the final plan set. 5. Inlet protection on all existing catch basins downstream of the disturbance area and adjacent to traffic routing. This includes the catch basin which the system is intended to tie into as well as the four (4) catch basins near the entrance. 6. All turf areas shall have a minimum of 6 inches of topsoil placed prior to seeding or sodding. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Project Narrative. 4. Reduced Copy Building Elevations. 5. Reduced Copy Existing Conditions. 6. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat. 7. Reduced Copy Civil Site Plan. 8. Reduced Copy Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan. 9. Reduced Copy Utility Plan. 10. Reduced Copy Landscape Plan. 11. Reduced Copy Site Lighting Photometrics. 12. Reduced Copy Final Plat. 13. Villages on the Ponds Development Design Standards. 14. Letter from Chuck Mayers, Center Point Energy, to Bob Generous dated 7/30/14. 15. Memorandum From Scott Sobiech, Barr Engineering Co., to Robert Generous dated 8/5/14. 16. Affidavit of Mailing of Public Hearing Notice. g: \plan\2014 planning cases\2014 -24 village shoppes of chanhassen sub spr var sig\staff report village shoppes.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Solomon Real Estate Group and VOP I, LLC for Subdivision and Site Plan approval. On August 19, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Solomon Real Estate Group and VOP I, LLC for preliminary plat and site plan approval. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development, PUD. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office /Industrial. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1, Villages on the Ponds Tenth Addition. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance and meets the standards of the Village on the Ponds Planned Unit Development; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan since the site is guided for mixed use development which includes commercial or multi - family residential; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature since adequate infrastructure is available. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 5. Site Plan. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a) The proposed project is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b) The proposed project is consistent with the Site Plan Review requirements of City Code; c) The proposed project preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; d) The proposed project creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e) The proposed project creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f) The proposed project protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 2 6. The planning report #2014 -24 dated August 19, 2014, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat (Villages on the Ponds Tenth Addition) and site plan for the Village Shoppes of Chanhassen. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 19th day of August, 2014. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT "' Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHANHASSEN Mailing Address - P O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 553AAgF Phone: (952) 227 -1300 / Fax: (952) 227 -1110 I APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT �� REVIEW Date Filed: % -18 - 14 60-Day Review Deadline: cf —4% - I Planner Rej ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ... __ ... ... .... ....... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Single - Family Residence . ............................... $325 ❑ All Others ..... . .......... _.... . .... ........ _............. $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ In conjunction with Single - Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others.._ ...... .. ....... ....... $425 ❑ Rezoning ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 ❑ All Others ........... .................. ................._.........$500 �Q Sign Plan Review-. [✓Ui- i /Fld $150 Site Plan Review ❑ Administrative .._._ ................ ...........................$100 Commercial /Industrial Districts '......._ .............$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area 1 -30 `lrclude number of existing employees: and number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts _._... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign ............. ......... ......._................... $200 (City to install and remove) it - y Property Owners' List within 500' ........ $3 per address (City to generate - fee determined at pre - application meeting) Escrow for ecordi Documents.. $50 per document (CUP A AP/Metes & Bounds Subdivision) to (Cp -S d a Create 3 lots or less ........ ....... ....................... $300 L] Create over 3 lots.. ..... ....... . .$600 + $15 per lot ❑ Metes & Bounds .........................$300 + $50 per lot F1 Consolidate Lots ................... ...........................$150 Lot Line Adjustment ...... ............................... jt5c FinalPlat * ............................. ...........................$250 Requires additional $456 escrow for attorney costs. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements /Right -of- way ................... $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance.......................... ........ _ ..... ............. ......... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Single - Family Residence .._ ...... ......... .......... $150 ❑ All Others.. ........................................ ...... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal.. ......... ..... ....... .. ....... _ ................ $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment .. ....... ..........._. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, lie appropriate tee shall be charged for each application. (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for mquimd submftla) information that must accompany Mis apptmahon) TOTAL FEES: $ Received fromSej I o ni or) R <a Date Received: n - t`b - 1-T Check Number t Iti Ktn-i Project Name: y ' i 1 dE4 p G _, «» F.k 42 a tih =a Property Address or Location: �4 t, o Parcel #:, 6- S 33n01 b Legal Description: L.r i i d (� ©� k I Y' 1(„<j c. a 4 L ?e. 4g A1 ' Total Acreage: t . -i T Ac_ Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No `=`� ^ ✓� ' _��� -ty Present Zoning: >,.: P Requested Zoning: Present Land Use Designation: i ,j 11 { Rcl .i ( Requested Land Use Designation: V? Existing Use of Property: L,4 x._. + La.. i Description of Proposal: tZc l d ` &J,% r. (, KCheck box if separate narrative is attached I— Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner. I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: S4c.3 fie!!.. se C)CSONt[X�'Kt�� �1niP %JroµContact S1e.�r Jam, �....za,_ Address: 11or- Phone: 6s:al ®Sit- .JZ3°J City/State/Zip: M W \LA 5'S Za s Cell: C4 sa I .T 10 -.Forma Email: S�c�a.. ', �, L.... u.... f+? <:.� lm� . 8_E .�.� Fax: l Signature: !���.�,.. L:... �.. - .-_. Date: -7 (, S /14 PROPERTY OWNER: in signing this application, 1, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, author¢e the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct Name: VO P I LC, Contact C1AV d- — Address: `5 '� Po ratty '{a.! Phone: 69al 97 S -044 Cdy /Statelzip: MkN S_V- a 1 -r Cell: Email: V.e, ^ ll� :- ✓ Ca Fax Signature: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly primed and must be accompanied by all Information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination at completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (f applicable) Name: Wes -4, cDd Contact: 6 >,,,..,kc Address: ? Ke "I fa'1a 4 0ww I,w),In Phone:11!CQ ,� 90 m — ? V 3 Cityrstate0p: Mirk '.SS 114'J Cell: fc1a1 t1,P -yyei1 Email: M t,-res Fax: Section 4: Notification information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: y_1 Property Owner Via: N Emaii ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ® Applicant Via: jgEmail ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: Engineer Via. �i Email El Mailed Paper Copy CoState2ip: ❑ Other- Vta ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email SCANNED New Development in Village Ponds PUD — Chanhassen, MN Narrative Introduction Solomon Real Estate is submitting the attached application for development of an approximate 1.45 -acre site in Chanhassen, Minnesota. This narrative describes the site development and various aspects of the application request. Location The site is presently vacant land and located next to Community Bank at the corner of Lake Drive East and Main Street. Various retail establishments surround the area respectively. Site Development As shown on the Concept Site Plan, the proposed development will have an approximate 13,100 square foot building housing both restaurant and support/convenience retail. Primary access to the site will be from either of the two lighted intersections on Hwy 5 at Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr. East or MN 101 respectively. The property is currently platted as one lot. The re -plat give an additional 2,125 square feet of land to Community Bank. Building Architecture As shown on the Architectural Elevations, the architecture and storefronts of the proposed buildings will use a combination of various building materials (brick, metal, glass and eifis). The building will be pulled to the front of the property lines giving an urban feel to the development. The building will feature a portico allowing for consumers to park either on the street, or in the parking field for the center. The roof line will have gable peaks on the corners to accent a more village look with the building. In addition, the portico will feature a tower element allowing for signage for up to three tenants, who otherwise would not be visible due to the north south orientation of the building. Traditional signage will be provided along sign bands on both sides of the building. Various storefronts will be tied together through the use of decorative brick piers and stucco cornices. Site Utilities Public utilities for sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer service will be made from the site within the adjacent roadway right -of ways. Other utilities (i.e., gas, electric, telephone) are also available to serve the site. Once completed, this development will generate excitement and energy drawing numbers of patrons to the area that will enhance shopping and dining visits to other nearby merchants as well. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEP7 SCANNED M pg� X I D N O 0 P .POeee1 Retell DAcMV: Lake and Main Oheeheaeen, MN c c 0 to NOWIN —.—G Enrol —_-0 V -o I (�r_ SIN e Z � o � O ° O pp C Q �: jj •r ©O =8a S p ga d g tCJ � 1 ?a leI leI ldIIIIIiSjj A°5 a g5my CIS O Go'J �yOYH'J ®oWO�al}3�t4iY3� o W a� VIII VIII S � e dCU1 o•�a418a�m ® ®n�aoa ® ® ® © ® ®,� y p c E /AP 400. 11 If% + v E eT w - <\ o J p c l I � t v W a 5 I k 5 ✓3 1 Q— I 11 leg C _.. {......L.. OWN- J m ; � 4.3 o � F e � d'a3 �ffi z s ; 's \ CJ y \ \ O 1 t arY+'R u� 11 O 1 la ,c I I --5 -j C1 e - I E 7 �3 Ls 5s s 5 ga a' o 9y9'yyrey goa FgA a ?�Y m 1n, 0 0 g F 8 4 $o 0 � 3y S pL 3 aR az� Fp Sjamy mbE:wyY�w° a$�aR tls° 8g M-Hi � 133H1S NIVPV a S80 s 5 ga a' o 9y9'yyrey goa FgA a ?�Y m 1n, 0 0 g F 8 4 $o 0 � 3y S pL 3 aR az� Fp Sjamy mbE:wyY�w° a$�aR tls° 8g M-Hi � 133H1S NIVPV i a 9 9 w Q J 2 if as O � V III � B 8141 g. a B oft J a i a 9 9 w Q J 2 if as O � V III � B 8141 g. a B oft J yE6 a m6 In! iW se a 4€ ,. I ago =n a� ;N ?a g�a„xi aka gab_ g =§ E "yz $ $a@ Fs'aa5� g OD O y 4.Fg s.'y �7F$e §e nag °=€�$° a 'a $sa 32b m§ e, e5 §�°35 y� 6°3A$ ME Sg$� §Fea e! . mum's $ qgb � b�� s e= ig� ^�� �$� -'� �g�w3 � § .: �: � e: s s a a 3 � s � § � @ a a off$ °$e°$ IL OR -41 = BOB! I '.i,.I a,5 =asE Qx� y=dm��g y �o b °§ g =`g:< I (• £ I 4w a O to U e+a� IRS � NO H a A "! �� �p 'b,° ° Easg o y gegbe y° E g y € � eg3 a iy see H . <�a ig: g .s g s g a -3 m $g 3: m,s: an as b -M o I I ag a sad W Affi3mo RRt 94 ON &a'as:aggReg F� ss s ?j g ez €ktva apag b�� gab m M e =m 0 6 w g "e as : a�g €� z nw u g @ogF�s€ c« � §§ z8c_ „ I N � n i e \ � ii n Q 6i1 Q LL ' C jaa s s -> 13361S NIVIN as zs �[516a E J - ��9 "3E 9kaya eg3b gEms €� HEEIM tae aE$$€ #¢$ a °p. $z$ e ° M " � a 3as 33Y � Eat a i &ae _ $ $s= s 9a :„�_ "$ xaPo' a n ° ^ a gi saq ^$� nog EyaV o a �N Pot a e� s;3 A99, :$ °EC ' €.Qeg as'ae s e a5 a s.a €M P. aa$ € h- paaAFzfi ax .. 5 xg : € gF. k e @e NNW ;. �.M aE @7e3$�.$e 2 °a ;a: a$gse 3u4g ^9 3 w § Z K�exH §IQ .nca �." � as ?m "s < 3 d a g§ A e a$: m # a x�a� ate= ... aw f$� a$ 3m eva Ego � $�' $� a =4= � �g�s g'3ay�, E$=� � � ®uu e E n ^$dy "Egs $$gEs E O a n -d $_ &$ "=��e;yza $�gd U =s „aa P' -1 3433n : aa 11 < 3° ay<Y emoeg e6 3 Vida AS/ Ili •� ka6 i i . N I� D ” d a x� uu a sa °� J aw J " Q t3f Q n ° J L _ t 1 -9HLE NIM . 8 $sl .dd dda Bad J 9 = IRI 4 q 55 � 3 ij a 8a isEw T8'+[ s.s9£44 z @ a P4 v 3 gg a " ¢ a41� =y a��p a s ". ° gy �ay`sg .? ms s a ds s 5 gq aet 3 g s g3g� s r' S• e3 ¢ g .ia g ^�! $ 8 r 3�` a@ 3 R a 3 W" ! a35a es� �xffie�e H E3 I�`s�a gg'a� 59gd Ins a €af hS 3 E $p yy ?a sg:;.d a `k3 a n g Y 3• @ lip e 33 a m � " k£ r$jaog 2 a da @ "a ;- e 3 A 33 H$$ r. 133N1S Nlb'YY =� y$e� Qao d Ip 0a „a3 4$6 b� B OHN E 8? &H. e s ;ap s's °fi =es Q 8g3 pei.§ syo s �=3gg?_ Bg ° i ��; ag3g3 '� i € Ta 3 =c4 Q, MA as e a "s jam. amg32 F r Phi In a M.j 3= y 9$k i'•p 414436 �` - s a b� z 8 O B F 2 0 h P d 0 J a a i B 6I JJ� d W Z EYE Q �'. a- Q is�g ?13 p J # J } } } \\\ \ }\ } } \ \ /((}. . ............., °`f ?` § ]/| }�! {) }(��� |�)!| �. t ! lam(]§ [$ �) \\ /_ )\ f\ | !/ l.,..,, gip... \. !! ©^ § ! ; ( ! ( � �!( L Q oa F gB R Rt � gg ,�Q333y Z z ci LL O O $ $ $ #E$$y 8 g I $ { 3 gp 4 �yy S gB > $ F $ s it $ 8g a t g4g 4' y i g S$€ If fx `Wy;y 6g 4 {f $ Q EEgFi $ a f �t$ a y ®$ a 4g$ } E gy �Ft 9 �R aS t E �n{ 8 gg t 999 $" $ �RS 9€ f�� �y B � i � gEt id If g S§ §38c es f SS §�' °d8 3z�A�$ es 38g g d2 $ ®� l {f f€ 6E� $ 4 119 !� g E F_ • �J j I - rtLLZ ANIIetaY — — — — — L Q Adopted September 23, 1996 Amended August 13, 2001 Amended November 26, 2001 Amended May 10, 2010 EXHIBIT C VILLAGES ON THE PONDS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a mixed use PUD consisting of commercial, institutional, office, and residential uses. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each lot proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. The Central Business District regulations shall apply except as modified by this ordinance. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to uses as defined below or similar uses to those as listed in the Standard Industrial Classification. If there is a question as to the whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. No single retail user shall exceed 20,000 square feet on a single level of a building. A maximum of thirty - three (33) percent of the square footage of the retail users within the development maybe of a "big box" category. The intent of this requirement is to provide a variety of users, including small retail shops, service providers, coffee shops, cabarets, etc., for residents of the Villages as well as the community as a whole, rather than typical suburban type large, individual users dominating the development and detracting from the "village" character. Retail users should be those that support and compliment the residential development located within the development, providing goods and services which enhance residents of the village and the community. Office. Professional and business office, non - retail activity except for showroom type display area for products stored or manufactured on -site provided that no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for such display and sales. bank/credit union finance, insurance and real estate health services - except nursing homes and hospitals engineering, accounting, research management and related services legal services Personal Services. Establishments primarily engaged in providing services involving the care of a person or his or her personal goods or apparel. dry cleaning beauty or barbershop shoe repair photographic studio tax return preparation laundromat health club optical goods computer services day care center copying mail stores Institutional. Establishments that are public /semi- public in nature. church library education services day care art gallery dance studio cultural facility Commercial/Retail. Establishments engaged in commercial operations including retail sales and services and hospitality industries. Apparel and Accessory Stores shoe stores electronic and music store and musical instruments restaurant — no drive through, except on Lot 1, Block 1, Villages on the Ponds 2 "d Addition through a conditional use permit and compliance with the following standards - the drive through shall provide sufficient stacking to assure that traffic is not backed into the parking lot drive aisles; loud speakers used for ordering shall be shielded so that noise is not heard off -site, and the drive through shall be screened from off -site views. (amended 8/13/01) restaurant - fast food only if integrated into a building no freestanding fast food and no drive through drug store /pharmacy book/stationary jewelry store hobby /toy game gift novelty and souvenir sewing, needlework and piece good florist camera and photographic supply art and art supplies, gallery sporting goods video rental food stores including bakery and confectionery hardware store computer store hotel /motel entertainment liquor store pets and pet supplies home furnishings Residential. Residential units shall be provided as upper level units above the commercial /office uses within the village core and as stand alone units. A minimum of 50 percent of the residential units shall be rental units. Of the rental units, the city has adopted a goal of 35 percent of the units meeting the Metropolitan Council's affordable criteria. For the ownership housing, the city has adopted the goal of 50 percent of the units meeting the Metropolitan Council's affordable criteria. Prohibited Uses: Auto related including auto sales, auto repair, gas stations C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, there is the requirement for landscape buffering in addition to building and parking setbacks. The following setbacks shall apply: Buildine Parkins Great Plains Blvd.: Buffer yard & Setback C, 0' 0' Market Blvd.: Buffer yard & Setback C, 50' 20' Hwy. 5: Buffer yard & Setback B, 50' 20' Interior Side Lot Line: Buffer yard & setback NA, 0' 0' East Perimeter Side Lot Line (adjacent to residential): Buffer yard & setback D, 50' 50' West Perimeter Side Lot Line (adjacent to industrial): Buffer yard & setback B, 50 20 Buffer yards are as specified in the City of Chanhassen Landscaping and Tree Removal Ordinance, Article XXV. No fences shall be permitted between the required landscape buffer and arterial and collector roads. d. Development Site Coverage and Building Height The PUD standard for hard surface coverage is 70% for the overall development. Individual lots may exceed this threshold, but in no case shall the average exceed 70 percent. 2. More than one (1) principal structure may be placed on one (1) platted lot. 3. The maximum building height shall be Sector I - four stories (residential with street level commercial or office) /50 ft. (retail and office buildings without residences above shall be limited to three stories /40 ft.) except for the lot on the corner of Promenade Pond and Great Plains Boulevard shall be limited to two stories and 30 feet, Sector II - three stories /40 ft., Sector III - three stories /40 ft., and Sector IV - four stories /50 feet. Building height limitations are exclusive of steeples, towers, and other architectural and roof accents. (Amended 11/26/01) 4. The maximum building footprint for any one building shall be limited to 20,000 square feet without a street level break in the continuity of the building, e.g., pedestrian passageways, except for the church and residential only buildings. 5. The following table shall govern the amount of building area for the different uses: (amended 11/26/01) * Includes 47,200 square foot, 106 unit motel. Building square footages may be reallocated between sectors and between uses subject to approval by the Planning Director. The following factors shall be used in calculating the reallocation of building square footages between uses: 1 Residential apartment unit = 3 congregate care (assisted living or dementia) unit. 11 Commercial/ Office /Service Institutional Dwelling TOTAL sq. f. Retail (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) Units Sector I 114,500 83,500 0 160 198,000 Sector II 60,000 * 14,000 0 0 74,000 Sector III 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 Sector IV 0 0 0 162 0 TOTAL 174,500 97,500 100,000 322 372,000 (amended 11/26/01) * Includes 47,200 square foot, 106 unit motel. Building square footages may be reallocated between sectors and between uses subject to approval by the Planning Director. The following factors shall be used in calculating the reallocation of building square footages between uses: 1 Residential apartment unit = 3 congregate care (assisted living or dementia) unit. 11 I Residential apartment unit = 2 elderly (independent) unit. 1 Residential apartment unit = 360 square feet of office /service. 1 Residential apartment unit = 90 square feet of retail. 1 Residential apartment unit = 440 square feet of institutional. 950 square feet of office /service = 1,000 square feet of institutional. 300 square feet of retail = 1,000 square feet of office /service. 290 square feet of retail = 1,000 square feet of institutional. (amended 11/26/01) In no instance shall addition institutional building square footage be reallocated without an amendment to the PUD. 6. Buildings adjacent to pedestrian sidewalks must have commercial /office on the majority of the street frontage. (amended 11/26/01) e. Building Materials and Design The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. The intent is to create a pedestrian friendly, "traditional" village character consistent with the European heritage of the upper midwest and the atmosphere within this development, yet with the amenities and technological tools of modem times. The village elevations shown on the PUD drawings are to be used only as a general guideline and the reflection of the overall village image including the north- midwestern architectural vocabulary, village like human scale and flavor, and variety in design and facade treatment. 2. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Major exterior surfaces of all walls shall be face brick, stone, glass, stucco, architecturally treated concrete, cast in place panels, decorative block, cedar siding, vinyl siding in residential with support materials, or approved equivalent as determined by the city. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted block or brick. Bright, long, continuous bands are prohibited. Bright or brilliant colors and sharply contrasting colors may be used only for accent purposes and shall not exceed 10 percent of a wall area. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. Exposed cement ( "cinder") blocks shall be prohibited. 4. Metal siding, gray concrete, curtain walls and similar materials will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials, or as trim or as HVAC screen, and may not exceed more than 25 percent of a wall area. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 6. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 7. The buildings shall have varied and interesting detailing. The use of large unadorned, concrete panels and concrete block, or a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in materials, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public ways shall be prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. Space for recycling shall be provided in the interior of all principal or accessory structures. 9. There shall not be underdeveloped backsides of buildings. All elevations shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. 10. The materials and colors used for each building shall be selected in context with the adjacent building and provide for a harmonious integration with them. Extreme variations between buildings on the same street in terms of overall appearance, bulk and height, setbacks and colors shall be prohibited. 11. Slope roof elements shall be incorporated in all structures: Sector I - minimum 70 percent of roof area shall be sloped, Sector II - minimum of 70 percent of the roof area shall be sloped, Sector III - minimum of 30 percent of the roof area shall be sloped, and Sector IV - minimum of 70 percent of the roof area shall be sloped. An exception to this requirement are roof areas designed for human use such as decks, garden areas, patios, etc., which will not be counted towards flat roof area. 12. The following design elements should be incorporated into individual structures: Building Accents Towers, silos, arches, columns, bosses, tiling, cloisters, colonnades, buttresses, loggias, marquees, minarets, portals, reveals, quoins, clerestories, pilasters. Roof Types Barrow, dome, gable, hip, flat. Roof Accents Cupolas, cornices, belfries, turrets, pinnacles, look -outs, gargoyles, parapets, lanterns. Accent elements such as towers, turrets, spires, etc., shall be excluded from the sector building height limitation. Window Tvnes Bay, single paned, multi -paned, angular, square, rectangular, half - round, round, italianate. Window Accents Plant boxes, shutters, balconies, decks, grates, canopies, awnings, recesses, embrasures, arches, lunettes. 13. Street level windows shall be provided for a minimum of 50 percent of the ground level wall area. f. Site Landscaping and Screening All buffer landscaping, including boulevard landscaping, included in Phase I shall be installed when the grading of the phase is completed. This may well result in landscaping being required ahead of individual site plan approvals, but we believe the buffer yard and boulevard plantings, in particular, need to be established immediately. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 2. All open spaces and non - parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells shall be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. Storage of material outdoors is prohibited. 4. Undulating or angular berms T to 5' in height, south of Highway 5 and along Market Boulevard shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right -of -ways. Wing walls maybe required where deemed appropriate. 6. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. g. Signage One project identification sign shall be permitted for the development at each end of Lake Drive and at the south end of Main Street. Project identification sign(s) may also be located at the entrances to the development(s) in Sector IV. Project identification signs shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five feet in height. 7 One project identification sign, with a maximum height of 20 feet, which may be increased in height subject to city approval based on the design and scale of the sign, designed as a gateway to the project shall be located at the north end of Main Street. Individual lots are not permitted low profile ground business sign. Within Sector III, one sign for the church and one sign for the school may be placed on streetscape walls. The top of the signs shall not extend more than eight feet above the ground and the total sign area for the signs shall not exceed 64 square feet. Pylon signs are prohibited. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. 2. All signs require a separate sign permit. 3. Wall business signs shall comply with the city's sign ordinance for the central business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs maybe permitted on the "street" front and primary parking lot front of each building. 4. Projecting signs are permitted along Main Street and Lake Drive and along pedestrian passageways subject to the conditions below. Signage Plan and Restrictions Wall Signs The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend greater than 20 feet above the ground. In Sector II, sign height may be increase based on the criteria that the signage is compatible with and complementary to the building architecture and design. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, or translucent facing. 2. If illuminated, individual dimensional letters and logos comprising each sign may be any of the following: a. Exposed neon/fiber optic, b. Open channel with exposed neon, c. Channel Letters with acrylic facing, d. Reverse channel letters (halo lighted), or e. Externally illuminated by separate lighting source. 3. Tenant signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant's proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 15% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. 4. Within Sector Il, architecturally, building - integrated panel tenant/logo sign may be permitted based on criteria that the signage is compatible with and complementary to the building design and architecture. 5. Back lit awnings are prohibited. Projecting Signs The letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign area. 2. All wooden signs shall be sandblasted and letters shall be an integral part of the building's architecture. Signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant's proper name and major product or service offered and such minimal messages such as date of establishment of business. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band or within the projecting sign and do not occupy more than fifteen (15) percent of the sign display area. 4. Projecting signs shall be stationary, may not be self - illuminated but may be lighted by surface mounted fixtures located on the sign or the adjacent facade. 5. Projecting signs shall be limited to one per tenant on street frontage and pedestrian passageway and my not exceed six square feet. Letters shall have a maximum height of 12 inches. 6. Projecting signs shall be a minimum of eight feet above the sidewalk and shall not project more than six feet from the building facade. Plastic, plexi- glass, clear plex, or similar material projecting signs are prohibited unless used in conjunction with other decorative materials. 8. Projecting signs may be painted, prefinished, or utilize exposed metal. Any exposed metal shall be anodized aluminum, stainless steel, titanium, bronze, or other similar non- corrosive or ono - oxidizing materials. Window Signs Window signs shall not cover more than 25 percent of the window area in which they are located. 2. Window signs shall not use bright, garish, or neon paint, tape, chalk, or paper. Menu Signs Shall be located at eye level adjacent to tenant entries and shall not exceed 4 feet in height. 2. Shall be used only to convey daily specials, menus and offerings and shall be wood framed chalkboard and/or electronic board with temporary handwritten lettering. No paper construction or messages will be permitted. 3. Menu signs shall be limited to one per tenant and may not exceed 8 square feet. Festive Flags /Banners Flags and banners shall be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. 2. Plastic flags and banners are prohibited. 3. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric. 4. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. 5. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two feet. 6. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. 7. Flags and banners which are torn or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. Building Directory 1. In multi -tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. Pole Directory Sign Pole directory signs consisting of single poles with individual nameplate type directional arrows may be located within the development. 2. Pole directory sign shall not exceed 15 feet in height. 3. Directory signs shall be a minimum of eight feet above the sidewalk. 4. A maximum of eight directory signs may be provided per pole. 10 5. The maximum size of an individual sign shall be 18 inches long by four inches wide. 6. Poles shall be a minimum of 10 feet behind the curb. h. Lighting Lighting for the interior of the business center should be consistent throughout the development. The plans do not provide for street lighting. As with previous developments, the City has required the developer to install street lights throughout the street system. 2. A shoe box fixture (as specified by City Code) with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. Lighting equipment similar to what is mounted in the public street right -of -ways shall be used in the private areas. 4. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 5. Light poles shall be limited to a height of 20 feet. 6. Lighting for parking areas shall minimize the use of lights on pole standards in the parking area. Rather, emphasis should be placed on building lights and poles located in close proximity to buildings. i. Parking Parking shall be provided based on the shared use of surface parking areas whenever possible. Cross access easements and the joint use of parking facilities shall be protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. 2. A minimum of 75 percent of a building's parking shall be located to the "rear" of the structure and in underground garages. The development shall be treated as a integrated shopping center and provide a minimum of one space per 200 square feet of commercial /retail area. The office /personal service component shall be treated as an integrated office building and provide 4.5 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 49,999 square feet, four per thousand square feet for the second 50,000 square feet, and 3.5 per thousand square feet thereafter. Residential uses shall provide 1.5 spaces per unit as underground parking with visitor spaces provided as part of the commercial /office uses. Within sector IV, visitor parking shall be provided at 11 a rate of 0.5 stalls per unit. Hotel /motels shall comply with city ordinance. Churches /schools shall comply with city ordinance, however, a minimum of 50 percent of the parking shall be shared. 12 SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION RE MAINTENACE AT VILLAGE ON THE PONDS Participants: Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme and Vemelle Clayton as Manager of the Village on the Ponds Association Current Street Work Completed and Scheduled: Leveling the sewer cover and replacing the asphalt has been completed at the north end of Main Street (at the Pond.) Addition of the second left of asphalt at Church Circle (the fountain) is scheduled for completion within the next 2 weeks. Replacing missing pavers at the Lake Drive/Main Street intersection is scheduled for this summer but no specific date has been promised. Routine mowing of areas adjacent to streets and along Highway 5, planting and maintaining of annual and perennials at various common locations, street sweeping, striping and snow removal from streets as well as fountain maintenance are also provided by the Association. All owners provide necessary landscape and lawn maintenance as well as snow removal within their individual parcels and along the walkways adjacent to their parcels. Future Street Work: The Association reserves $3,000 per year for street repairs, with a total current reserve account of $36,000. While this account, together with future special assessment and /or budget increases can accommodate the repair of a certain amount of the streets, it is not entirely adequate for major repairs to Lake Drive. In fact, Lake Drive has functioned from the outset as a cut - through from Hwy 101 traffic seeking to bypass one or more stop lights to access Hwy 5. This has resulted in an inordinate amount of traffic which does not originate from nor terminate within Village on the Ponds. The potential of some public /private cost arrangement similar to other street improvements but with a different ratio of cost sharing was discussed. Other streets and /or drive aisles functioning as streets within Village on the Ponds include: Lake Drive from the turn off to the homes behind St. Hubert to Hwy 5. This is a City street and is maintained by the City. Pond Promenade from the north end of Main Street to Lake Drive (at the Starbucks intersection is considered to be a Village on the Ponds Street and is maintained by the Association Pond Promenade from the north end of Main Street to the intersection at Americl m is not a part of the responsibility of the Association. It is owned by the Northcott entity which owns the adjacent vacant parcel. The street from the intersection described above southward to the intersection with Lake Drive in front of Bokoo Bikes, is considered the responsibility of the Association to maintain.. Misc. re Pavers: The contractor who did the work at the north end of Main Street will be using some of the saved pavers from that site to replace loose and/or missing pavers at the primary intersection of Lake and Main and the Northcott entity has been invited to do the same for the intersection at AmericInn. Sidewalks We discussed the condition of the sidewalks briefly. The owners of the improvements adjacent to the sidewalks are responsible for their maintenance and to date several have been repaired and/or replaced. This summer, PHM and Community Bank, for example have both replaced certain portions. The existing tarvia walkways were done by the original developer with the understanding that any such sidewalks would be the ongoing responsibility of the adjacent property owner and it was assumed that appropriate concrete walkways would be installed as the parcels were improved. St. Hubert's Participation It was brought to my attention that there appears to be some misunderstanding on the part of the staff at St. Hubert's as to their participation in the Association and its maintenance responsibilities. While St. Hubert's is not a voting member of the Association, they were, by virtue of a Tri-Party Agreement which is of record, responsible for an initial negotiated annual payment toward the budgeted costs of the Association, and each year are responsible for and have paid an amount resulting from applying the percentage increase in CPI to the previous year's amount assessed. In addition, should any improvements be made whether by the Association or others which are assessable or which would qualify as assessable improvements, St., Hubert's is obligated to pay an amount which they are or could be assessed for such improvements. Summary Prepared by Vernelle Clayton August 5, 2014 l: +r July 30, 2014 City of Chanhassen Bob Generous AICP Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Planning Case: 2014 -24 Dear Mr. Generous: 700 West Linden Avenue PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440 -1165 With reference to your request, CenterPoint Energy has no natural gas mains within the requested area, but we do have a service line to the building to the NE of the new proposed platted area, knowing this CenterPoint Energy has no objection to this proposal at this time and will work with you if the service line needs to be moved within the new plat. We do have gas services in the area and look forward to working with you when the time comes for new services. If you have any questions, please contact me at 612- 321 -5381. Respectfully, CENTERPOINT ENERGY All Chuck Mayers (� Right -of -Way Specialist Engineering Services charies.mayers@centerpointenergy.com 612 -321 -5381 resourceful, naturally. BARB engineering and environmentol consultants � Memorandum To: Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner; City of Chanhassen From: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject: Village Shoppes of Chanhassen Plan Review by Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District Date: August 5, 2014 c: Claire Bleser; Administrator Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District The Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) is in the process of implementing watershed district rules. The draft rules were released for public review and comment earlier this spring. The District is currently reviewing comments and anticipates implementing the permitting program this summer. Because the draft rules have not been adopted, the District does not currently have an official permitting program. We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the project relative to the draft rules and your willingness to work with the District in advance of the permitting program. The following is a summary of RPBCWD review comments for the Village Shoppes of Chanhassen development at 460 Lake Drive East. The following comments are based on the draft rules that would likely apply to this project and highlight the areas where revisions or additional information would be needed to fully meet the draft rules. Rule C: Erosion and Sediment Control Rule C: Erosion and Sediment Control applies if a project disturbs more than 5,000 square feet or more than 50 cubic yards. Based on the submitted design plans and supporting documents, the project will disturb more than 5,000 square feet and excavate more than 50 cubic yards. In this case Rule C would apply, and the comments below should be reflected in the plans. • Provide an erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with Section 4 (requirements of the erosion and sediment control plan submittal) and meeting the criteria established in Section 3 of Rule C. Rule J: Stormwater Management Rule J: Stormwater Management applies if a project disturbs 5,000 square feet or more distrubs 50 cubic yards or more. Based on the submitted design plans and supporting documents, the project will disturb more than 5,000 square feet and excavate more than 50 cubic yards. Because the project will increase the imperviousness of the parcel by more than 50 percent, the criteria will apply to the entire parcel. The following criteria would apply. Borr Engineering Co. 4700 West 77th Street, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.borr,com To: Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner; City of Chanhassen From: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject: Village Shoppes of Chanhassen Plan Review by Riley- Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Date: August 5, 2014 Page: 2 • Rate Control: Documentation must be provided showing that the project does not increase runoff rates for all points where stormwater leaves the site for the 2 -, 10 -, and 100 -year storm events, and the 100 -year frequency, 10 -day snowmelt event. This analysis must be done using Atlas 14 reference data using a nested storm distribution. o The impervious percentage, pervious area, and pervious percentage for existing conditions listed in the project description do not match the HydroCAD modeling. Review and revise for consistency between the project summary and analysis. o A stormwater analysis was provided that addressed rate control for the 2 -, 10 -, and 100 - year storm events. The events used Atlas 14 precipitation depths; however they used the SCS Type II distribution. The modeling should be revised to use a nested storm distribution based on the Atlas 14 precipitation. • The storm depths listed in the HydroCAD modeling do not match the storm depths listed in the rate control summary table. Review the depths and use consistent values. • The draft RPBCWD rules require that the project not increase runoff rates for all points where stormwater leaves the site. To accurately comply with the draft rules, the existing conditions modeling should be split to represent that there are two points where stormwater leaves the site, and documentation should be provided showing that the runoff rates do not increase at both locations. o Provide information documenting the existing and proposed time of concentration estimates. The existing time of concentration seems low when compared to the total time of concentration in the proposed conditions modeling. o It appears that the HydroCAD modeling is allowing outflow from the StormTech system through both a 4" draintile and a 12" pipe with an invert of 941.0. Confirm that the HydroCAD modeling correctly represents the system as it is proposed. o Verify that the Intensity- Duration - Frequency data obtained from MnDOT for the Rational Storm Sewer Design Tabulation uses the Atlas 14 precipitation depths. o Provide a figure showing the existing and proposed drainage divides for the site, including subwatershed divides that match the subwatersheds in the HydroCAD model. • Volume Control: Stormwater management features must provide abstraction for 1.1 inches of runoff from all impervious surface of the parcel because the project increases the imperviousness of the parcel by more than 50 %. o Pretreatment of runoff must be provided for all filtration facilities. Pretreatment could include using sump manholes or SAFL baffles upstream of the StormTech chambers on the proposed storm sewer system. o The proposed design routes only the proposed impervious surface to the StormTech chambers for treatment. RPBCWD draft rules require that the project provide treatment for the entire parcel. To: Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner; City of Chanhassen Prom: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject: Village Shoppes of Chanhassen Plan Review by Riley- Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Date: August 5, 2014 Page: 3 o The proposed project includes filtration of runoff but does not include any of the required runoff abstraction. o The applicant may request that the property be considered a restricted site due to underlying soil conditions, and request that the project be considered using one of the criteria in Rule J, Section 3.3. To apply for restricted site consideration, the applicant must demonstrate that the abstraction standard cannot be met. However, Section 3.3 would still require abstraction to the maximum extent practicable. • Water Quality: Stormwater management features must provide an annual total phosphorus removal of at least 75% and an annual total suspended solids removal of at least 90% from all site runoff. o Calculations must be provided that verify that the proposed treatment system provides the required level of water quality treatment. No water quality computations were provided. • General Comments: o The invert of the StormTech system is listed as 944.5 in the water quality narrative, which is different than the cross - sections and other sections of the analysis. Review and revise for consistency between the plans and analysis. o Provide a plan view layout for the StormTech system and draintile configuration. This should include storm sewer inlet and outlet connections. o The provided Utility Plan has a discrepancy about the pipe size of the outlet from the StormTech system. Confirm the pipe dimension on the plans and update the modeling if necessary. o Verify that the proposed grading allows for adequate cover over the StormTech system to support traffic loading. o Verify that the catch basin in the parking lot has sufficient inlet capacity to convey the design storm into the treatment system and account for flows not captured by the catch basins (i.e. bypass flow) in discharge leaving the site. • All stormwater management structures and facilities must be designed for maintenance access and properly maintained in perpetuity. A maintenance and inspection plan must be provided. • Upon completion of site work, submit as -built drawings demonstrating that at the time of final stabilization, stormwater facilities conform to design specifications as approved by the District. To: Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner; City of Chanhassen From: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject: Village Shoppes of Chanhassen Plan Review by Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District Date: August 5, 2014 Pane: 4 Summary Based on the information provided to date, the proposed design would not fully meet the RPBCWD draft rules once implemented. Depending on the timing of the project and the official implementation date of the draft rules, the project could be required to obtain Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management permits from RPBCWD. CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on August 7, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Village Shoppes of Chanhassen — Planning Case 2014 -24 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. KaLdi J. Engelh • , eputy Cl Subscribed and sworn to before me this Z1'`day of A , 2014. Notat Publico;.z.; KIM 7- MEUWISSEN a,,......s Notary per. My comet ic'Minneaote �P6us J9" 31.2015 C N d j 0) O C N .L d ££C = G �? O U CL' c 0 C C 0a is c ZN R s C R s V C d 5 00 C z �L d S v o U LL c_ 0 C C CD R '? a O c Z N tl) R t C R s U 'C � 'O d d O y >% Mn m a OD d L d N N N R N mn q ��'� o O > 2 Oa N 0 YN(D ycO ' o" . d E CL m ° C cR c E O � E d 66 Z, M 0)= a) 4) a) 0 0 a E N d 0 a o O%E, Qa2 m .° a E O - o c ' c m `m N S > O R O c . O °"> N C 0 6 8 E o Oo m E m, qmO �Y c@ N> N O d � E c m Co O p -0N � O 3 p O a) ° R a) m o s p So °N FIn w NO V a O w N YJ C d N 'C Gs N O Ea E °'m E m Q ° O w d R r V c m c c c y�EWu E E @ =M CO �� 0 O E N d° 9 aoc W a2t o d0 R a � L NRU N N w d d m L o ooc o ` m E N O z .m Or_ O O nd wp C .•a'R m 01C) � O 7RN '0N d + m E I v , x E m M O WIRE �c C o I_ � r-- d � p W E ° o O c = .dRO a.0 c d OpL O EOOE , =q<< V m 'u ' EE E:2 E ° a R c Od N E > m mL a) .0 LO .j.. > N � O d .° o E Uc y W « 2 c � 0 q O0) N>d O d CO)L O"O u °o Nm> ` Ga0 d > O o a m c L°o y C L ay c a yD v N E H C d (c � `O O te> L O oT EJ w m y-c 0 1m L m �L a�-r R> > � y 7_ RQ CN = 3: U K E`.c a. - Em o o o o q cj c UJn c R CLN M E C C LC s o N >TO W O . U > V N pN _ O R _E c m o Q m o mn $ WUC m � U) cu C UJ � m O O N O m ? n E m m E m Q ° 0,p co R p a Y, �O N'a L Q E O � di mr m - #a u .Jm'u -o m3 Qtr - i C d O R E .0 O a C 0) r- . E o, m m"wc r o R -z = pd p J = U „ O L �,_ O R N L C a mma @$°c cc omE 0 N 3 O r Ci O( � C O. 0'-E--,E. C nEE m n wm d7 p d 0 , 7 0 co p O 0-0.0 L . O N .o aEO L a o B Uo mommd . m D m” m W E m W E ._ c O- H Ci C! L N y VF R R Q N CO tL- d p)L E a Z m �J E °�cUc C Q E. tl m Uy v E a od Im N ?.c aEcU o mL m ~ o 3- :o 0w EmJ N om E o � E�� m c d 61 $ aNEE ' ancC a 1d m aon eUgcmo d-U u r'odm E C N o O C �moE o m o mn>i ~ O O 0 C d - d m D O m w « N C m OE F C O O V _ d r 0 C C O d mR'm cm0 m m Q O S c > > _� W L m L °W"EEo mo E>m. d ~(0 O CL p �0 ° Eo = v cw E R J O . J Rr ¢ma .um mt ad M. U U 2c o m m vmi O O O IL io au . rO � CD N w d O 1 C o � B Em 00 N ` a 0 °r N C ~ m m � vc ° w � dOm o ¢ o -p —0 2 3 0 .> m 3 1` d O � N R C O E 12 2P-- m 'O E N d O x .L m 'a Wdn$°m «EE o R OV C OO P C _ m v E mW Em m a° m -oa Q O O OL l EC C y O m m m m - c �0amncc�.W O R m � O m 0 d C E O m mm 0 O u > tEOR> m a U. °l p d -- J U U , a Ua Ea 0 o m o Q = E = ' - m Q.lE m m c oN R- O d 'om m m m o oZ) N UE c .P wE a�Y3 c W -im -- o O m 0 Co 46 C C d) C d L `) N N R I oo _0., 5 d E OL O O O aw O 3: E N CO N -0 d Em e 04, -E:5-Ea« -L m e I� c d C d E ,cR O a d 9 d m N mom m cnm m o _ O d E q 0 a) CN Q C LU - > E c£ no n C m'o m o E c M6 `m V ` d 0 O C ` OLd0 'O p O) N RN O d d O L C R U.''cm 1 m m> E o >v c oma E Od > � °y ` C dV o > n7 0. >d9 v a- m� a E N R> y C a) R C �N Q Q ° ° d E ° O m ' E c c O n m cwn) E OyF Co W N N T ° a- 4r F - 7d R O w d c tw Q 03 � a uN c . c 1c 0 dN�n UJ Co R c 0N r N L Ndc m m Q> E Cc ° co R p a C o N M Od Nc U r m Qtr O ca d U E N N d L Q Q Co R r L a+i V O V c O R R o�C d O dL O 6O r- E m m 0 1 cO Emm 0'y °mfi R (6 0)d OYO � co Ea co OURL O7L a) �C C �0 CE � C U� Nw imm o E,mm °E= vmo- «« a yE j�E c � 0 c0 p Q L as ° E d N p nE c°O 0�rno rva L aG C Q E. tl N ?.c aEcU o mL m ~ o 3- :o 0w EmJ N :m omo ..gop 'g o vioE9Tv� of mEmd mcnmm .c0m . °c vv'�,Aym co eo06 f a N a d W°m a m m cN C oL F C O C O C C O d O O R «OS ~(0 N j OE;tW o m _ �i L d d O . C L d Rr y E ym,vo � nW NcEE[g c a �a3 vonm a,jE O O O O O i 7 EmJ N0d ff E . Rd� mEm O ,mm o m`o,)C m O o. Q nJ ALBERT R SINNEN AUSMAR DEVELOPMENT CO LLC CHCR LLC 8150 GRANDVIEW RD 5916 HANSEN RD PO BOX 1038 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9459 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 -2513 MASON CITY, IA 50402 -1038 CHRISTOPH J LESER 8110 MARSH DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9624 COMMUNITY BANK CORP 706 WALNUT ST N CHASKA, MN 55318 -2265 NICHOLAS L & EMILY PRONGA 8120 MARSH DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9624 PHM /CHANHASSEN INC 2845 HAMLINE AVE N ROSEVILLE, MN 55113 -7127 THOMAS JBEUTZ 8090 MARSH DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8319 WHEATSTONE RESTAURANT GROUP 250 EAST LAKE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9364 CHURCH OF ST HUBERT 8201 MAIN ST CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9647 GREGORY D & MARY A LARSEN 8151 GRANDVIEW RD CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9460 NORTHCOTT COMPANY 250 EAST LAKE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9364 ROBERT J & LOIS A SAVARD 8080 MARSH DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8319 TREVOR MAASSEN 8100 MARSH DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9624 CLOUTIER PROPERTIES CORP 16505 75TH AVE N OSSEO, MN 55311 -2783 KINSALE OF CHANHASSEN LLC PO BOX 404 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -0404 PAUL F & RITA A KLAUDA 8130 MARSH DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9624 SILO BUILDING LLC 3561 44TH ST W MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55410 -1359 VOP I LLC PO BOX 404 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -0404