Loading...
PC Staff Report 01-20-2015PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approves Planning Case #2015 -02 for an accessory structure area variance, subject to the conditions of the staff report; and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The property owner is requesting a variance to construct a 30 -foot by 48 -foot horse shelter (1,440 square feet) LOCATION: 750 West 96"' Street Lot 1, Block 1, Jeurissen Addition APPLICANT: Canssa and Steve Haverly 750 West 96th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 checsum @grnarl com PRESENT ZONING: Agriculture Estate District (A -2) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (Net density 1.2 — 4 0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 2 5 acres DENSITY N/A LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards This is a quasi - judicial decision Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Planning Commission 750 West 96th Street Variance — Planning Case 2015 -02 January 20, 2015 Page 2 of 8 PROPOSAL /SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a variance to exceed the 1,000 square -foot maximum area for a detached accessory structure to construct a 1,440 square - foot horse stable The site also contains a 67 square foot shed that houses a lawn mower The Zoning Ordinance limits detached accessory structures to 1,000 square feet While the size of the stable exceeds the maximum square footage by 440 square feet, the property is agriculturally zoned and permits horses and private stables. Limiting the area of the stable to 1,000 square feet for a horse stable is a practical difficulty The applicant has 3 horses and needs the space to house the animals and store hay. City Code also requires that horses must be provided shelter of sufficient size to for necessary protection and must provide space for the animal to roll with a minimum danger of being cast (trapped under stable boards). A 1,000 square -foot stable would minimize the stall and walkway spaces as well as storage area for related supplies The site is bordered by W 96h Street to the northeast and single family homes along the north, south, east and west Water and sewer services are not available to the site. Access to the parcel is gained via West 96' Street. Staff is recommending approval of the variance, subject to the conditions of the staff report APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article IX, "A -2" Agricultural Estate District Section 20 -904 (1) Accessory Structures Chapter 5, Article III Horses Planning Commission 750 West 96th Street Variance — Planning Case 2015 -02 January 20, 2015 Page 3 of 8 BACKGROUND The house on the property was originally constructed in 1970 on a 5 -acre parcel. In 1987, the parcel was subdivided into two lots. The subject property is Lot 1, Block 1, Jeunssen Addition which is zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) The subject property has an area of 2 5 acres. The lot frontage is 180.73 feet and is accessed off of West 96th Street; however, the site has no direct frontage onto a public street The depth of the site is 659 feet. Minimum lot area in the A2 district is two and one -half acres with a minimum lot frontage of 200 feet. The subject site received a lot width variance at the time the subdivision was approved and has 180 73 foot frontage Section 20 -904 Accessory Structures The current zoning ordinance pertaining to the maximum 1,000 sq ft detached accessory structure was adopted in May of 2007 Prior to that, the City Code limited the size of detached accessory structures on properties zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and Mixed Low Density Residential (R4), but not in the Low and Medium Residential District (RLM); the Agricultural Estate (A2), and Rural Residential (RR) Zoning Districts since they were at one time related to agricultural uses As the City continues to grow, agricultural uses are being replaced by estate homes. The City Code prohibits the use of accessory structures for home occupations In some cases, contractors were purchasing the property and building accessory structures, in addition to an attached garage, to house their business. In order to address this issue, the code was amended to limit the size of accessory structures to 1,000 square feet in all districts that permit single- family homes. At that time it was presumed that legitimate agricultural uses which came in to construct or expand agricultural buildings would be able to receive a variance for such expansion since the size of the structure is related to its use for agricultural purposes. The "Practical Difficulty" is related to the ability to maintain the horses and provide adequate shelter on an agriculturally zoned property as permitted by City Code The stated intended use of the accessory structure to be located on the subject property is for storage of hay and as a horse stable, which is a permitted accessory use. Private Stable City Code permits private stables and horses within the A2 zoning district The number of horses permitted is based on the acreage of the site a minimum one and one -half acre for two horses, two acres for three horses, and an additional one -third acre for each additional horse. Based on the size of the subject site (2 5 acres) the property could, contain up to 4 horses Planning Commission 750 West 96t' Street Variance — Planning Case 2015 -02 January 20, 2015 Page 4of8 City Code also requires that horses must be provided shelter of sufficient size to provide necessary protection and space for the animal to roll with a minimum danger of being cast Limiting the area of the stable to 1,000 square feet for a horse stable is a practical difficulty Shelter of sufficient size must be provided. A 1,000 square - foot stable would minimize the stall and walkway spaces as well as storage area for related supplies City Code requires private stables to meet minimum setback requirements A private stable may not be located closer than 100 ft from any neighboring residential dwelling and 200 feet from any wetland The 1,440 sq. ft. stable is proposed to be located east of the driveway and will meet all required setbacks In addition to the stable, the pasture area must be enclosed by a wire fence to ensure the horses stay contained within the site as required in Chapter 5, Division 2, Stable Permits f -. House I*1 Shed ` 1r 14 {' Proposed •h t ► ,+ . , Driveway fi Proposed Stable 1 � r I M y r'ri N T I n drt r we a rM t . r TW ! I rK .{ r t Planning Commission 750 West 96"' Street Variance — Planning Case 2015 -02 January 20, 2015 Page 5 of 8 ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a 30 -foot by 48 -foot stable, 1,440 square -foot horse shelter The property currently has an existing 67- square -foot shed The purpose of the request to exceed the 1,000 square -foot accessory structure limitation is to provide an adequate stable for horses on an agriculturally zoned property Agricultural uses were addressed in the discussion of the amendment in 2007, in that it would be a reasonable request based on a legitimate agricultural use and will be keeping in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the A2 district The proposed stable will meet all required setbacks and height limitations as outlined in the A2 zoning district. The A2 district permits other agricultural uses and farm animals Section 20 -1001 (3) of the City Code states Farm animals are an allowed use on all farm property except as otherwise specifically provided in the City Code. Farm animals may not be confined in a pen, feed lot or building within 100 feet of any residential dwelling not owned or leased by the farmer The proposed stable is 48 feet by 30 feet (1,440 square feet) to accommodate four horses, tack, feed, and hay City Code definition- Farms animals means cattle, hogs, bees, sheep, goats, chickens, turkeys, horses, llama, emu, and other animals commonly accepted as farm animals in the State of Minnesota The practical difficulties of the variance to exceed the 1,000 square -foot limitation are directly related to horses and the requirements of the Stable Permit in Chapter 5 of City Code The proposed building will contain overhead doors along the western elevation. Equipment Stall l & Grain Storage Stall 2 ' Hay Stall Storage Area Stall Farms animals means cattle, hogs, bees, sheep, goats, chickens, turkeys, horses, llama, emu, and other animals commonly accepted as farm animals in the State of Minnesota The practical difficulties of the variance to exceed the 1,000 square -foot limitation are directly related to horses and the requirements of the Stable Permit in Chapter 5 of City Code The proposed building will contain overhead doors along the western elevation. Planning Commission 750 West 96a' Street Variance — Planning Case 2015 -02 January 20, 2015 Page 6 of 8 The smallest standard stable width offered by common manufacturers is 36 feet This allows for a 12 -foot wide by 12 -foot deep stall (common stall size recommended by equine experts) or tack room on each side of the 12 -foot center aisle. Staff reviewed city records to determine if any structures in proximity to the subject site were constructed after the accessory structure limitation was adopted in 2007 Year F951 ro er Address Type of Variance Outcome 2007 Homestead Lane A 177 - square -foot variance to exceed the Approved 1,000 square -foot maximum for accessory structures to allow for a 452- square -foot addition to an existing 725- square -foot detached garage 2014 610 West 96t1i Street 1,848 square -foot horse shelter and a 264 square- Denied by the foot day shelter. Currently, the property has Planning 12,706 square feet of accessory structures Commission Being appealed to City Council 2012 r720 0 West 96th Street Construct a 2,560- square -foot accessory structure Approved 2012 West 96th Street Reconstruct and expand by 520 square feet an Approved existing accessory structure, which is a 40 -foot by 37 -foot building with a 40 -foot by 8 -foot covered walkway /lean -to area (1,800 square feet total 2012 760 West 96" Street 7,120 square -foot accessory structure Denied 620 Ye.96 ' Street Planning Commission 750 West 96th Street Variance — Planning Case 2015 -02 January 20, 2015 Page 7 of 8 As can be seen from the aerial photo, this neighborhood has numerous accessory structures in excess of 1,000 square feet As the property is less than ten acres, the agricultural exemption from building code requirements does not apply. Building permit(s), plan review and approvals are required for the proposed building GRADING The proposed structure will sit on the eastern side of the property The grading will direct water away from the structure and away from the neighboring property The water will flow to the back of the lot, which follows the existing front -to -back drainage pattern The provided drawing shows silt fence to be installed down gradient of the construction area. In the event a building permit application comes forward, erosion prevention and sediment control requirements will be addressed at that time SITE CONSTRAINTS There are no wetlands, bluffs or other features or overlay districts which must be addressed on this parcel The proposed barn will not exceed the allowed hardcover percentage and should not negatively impact surface water management in the area. DRIVEWAY The proposed driveway will wrap around the east side of the existing house to tie into the existing gravel driveway The plan shows a 15% grade near the existing house The grading must be revised so as not to exceed the maximum allowed driveway slope of 10% The engineer must also work with City staff on the alignment of the proposed driveway to provide an adequate turning radius for the larger vehicles used to bring animals, equipment and feed to the proposed structure FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS Per the staff report for the Jeurissen Plat, the 30 -foot easement on the northern edge of this property was platted with the intent that when the property to the north was developed, the easement would be used for half of a 60 -ft. roadway easement to extend W 96th Street While the proposed driveway for this accessory structure will not violate current code, it should be noted that if the City extends W 96th Street into the 30 -ft easement as planned, a legal, non - conformity may be created regarding code for the number of allowed driveways or allowed driveway width at the right -of -way RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Planning Case #2015 -02 for a 1,440- square -foot stable for a total area variance of 507 square feet subject to the following conditions and adoptions of the attached Findings of Fact and Decision 1 The grading of proposed driveway must be revised, to not exceed a 10% slope at any time Planning Commission 750 West 96"' Street Variance — Planning Case 2015 -02 January 20, 2015 Page 8 of 8 2 The engineer must also work with the Engineering Department on the alignment of the proposed driveway to meet adequate turning radius for vehicles 3 The private stable must meet all setback requirements 4 Building permit required 5. Structure must comply with Minnesota State Building Code 6. The applicant must obtain a stable permit 7. The accessory structure may not be used as a separate dwelling unit ATTACHMENTS 1 Findings of Fact and Decision 2 Development Review Application. 3. Applicant's Narrative. 4 Land Survey. 5. Affidavit of Mailing of Public Hearing Notice CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Carissa and Steve Haverly for a 507 square -foot variance from the 1,000 square - foot accessory structure area limitation to construct a 1,440 square -foot stable on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) — Planning Case #2015 -02. On January 20, 2015, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is Lot 1, Block 1, Jeurissen Addition 4 Variance Findings — Section 20 -58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan Finding: The subject site is zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) Private stables are a permitted use within the A2 zoning district The property has an area of 2 5 acres, and according to City Code could contain up to 4 horses A private stable in excess of the 1,000 square feet is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter and consistent with the comprehensive plan b There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance 'Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems Finding: Limiting the area of the stable to 1,000 square feet for a horse stable is a practical difficulty, being that the property could, according to City Code, house up to 4 horses City Code also requires that horses must be provided shelter of sufficient size to provide necessary protection and must provide space for the animal to roll with a minimum danger of being cast. A 1,000 square -foot stable would minimize the stall and walkway spaces as well as storage area for related supplies c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone Finding: The purpose of the request is to have a private stable and horses on an agriculturally zoned lot for personal use. The private stable is not intended for economic gain d The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner Finding: The property is unique due to the fact that it is an agriculturally zoned property within the City City ordinance permits private stables on agriculturally zoned property. However, to limit home occupations from being run out of accessory structures, the city limited the size of accessory structures in all residential zoning districts to 1,000 square feet in 2007 City Code also requires that horses must be provided shelter of sufficient size to provide necessary protection and must provide space for the animal to roll with a minimum danger of being cast A 1,000 square -foot stable would minimize the stall and walkway spaces as well as storage area for related supplies. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality Finding: A private stable in excess of 1,000 square feet will not alter the essential character of the locality, rather it is consistent with the A2 zoning district and permitted uses f Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C 06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5 The planning report #2015 -02, dated January 20, 2015, prepared by Sharmeen Al -Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. 2 DECISION The Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves Planning Case 2015 -02, for a 507 square -foot variance from the 1,000 square -foot accessory structure area limitation to construct a 1,440 square -foot stable on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments this 20"' day of January, 2015. CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chairman COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHMNSEN Mailing Address - P O Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone (952) 227 -1300 / Fax (952) 227 -1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Date Filed ! J 19 — / 4 60 -Day Review Deadline. — I — S Planner ,:Z'hn y-M eP h Case # ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for fading on -site sewers $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Single - Family Residence $325 ❑ All Others $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ In conjunction with Single - Family Residence $325 ❑ All Others $425 ❑ Rezoning ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD $100 ❑ All Others $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review $150 ❑ Site Plan Review ❑ Administrative $100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts* $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area *Include number of existing employees and number of new employees ❑ Residential Districts $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign $200 (City to install and remove) Qp3oddress Property Owners' List within 500' $3 (City to generate — fee determined at pr lication meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents 50 r document (CUP /SPR/VAClVAR/WAP /Metes & Bounds Subdivision) Project Name Property Addre Parcel # QL7, GG lc> Legal Description La k 1 , 13 1c,ck Total Acreage O1 S Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes -No Present Zoning Present Land Use Designation ; }y Existing Use of Property Description of Proposal \/(1,(`fy C�Cr_-rn� ❑ Subdivision ❑ Create 3 lots or less .$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots $600 + $15 per lot ❑ Metes & Bounds $300 + $50 per lot ❑ Consolidate Lots $150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment $150 ❑ Final Plat* $250 *Requires additional $450 escrow for allomey costs Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract ❑ Vacation of Easements /Right -of -way $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance .. $20 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence. $150 ❑ All Others $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment $500 NOTE When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) TOTAL FEES $ 1-1 Ix 00 Received from t f riSSU Date Received 12 -19- 4 Check Number l ©� 144109 Check box if separate narrative is attached Requested Zoning A Q Requested Land Use Designation OfN P_ n Sl V 1^ A - yDK; SCANNED Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct Name Contact Address Phone City /State /Zip Cell Email Fax Signature Date PROPERTY OWNER- In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct Name Contact CIUf _ Address 7,S7G W q6 4 "'S Phone City /State /Zip C Cell SaVY1 Email C ( U 0. Fax i\ Signature Date i — This ap tion must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name Contact Address Phone City /State /Zip Cell Email Fax. Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information - ❑ Property Owner Via ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name ❑ Applicant Via ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address ❑ Engineer Via ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City /State /Zip ❑ Other* Via ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email SCANNED Written description of variance requested To whom it may concern, 12/1/14 The variance that 1, Carissa Haverly D V M , am requesting is to build a 1440 sq ft steel building Current city code allows for only a 1000sq ft of accessory building My property currently has a small shed, (67sq. ft) that houses my lawn mower The barn will be constructed by a reputable builder and comply with all building codes It will be 30ft across and 48ft long with a large sliding door in the front and back of the barn Currently, I am allowed a cumulative 1000sq ft of accessory building by the city Including the 67 sq ft from my shed, I need a variance of 507 sq feet Please see my "Written Justification" for further details on why this variance is necessary to the health and safety of my horses. Carissa Haverly D V M SCANNED Written Justification for Variance from city code 750 W 96th St. Chanhassen, MN 55317 To whom it may concern, Thank you for your time reviewing this application My name is Dr. Carissa Haverly lama veterinarian who recently purchased my primary residence herein the city of Chanhassen, MN lam requesting a variance to add an additional 507sq ft. to the allowed 1000sq ft to a horse barn I need to build My property is zoned Agriculture estate zone A2, and is slated to continue this zoning until 2030. 1 purchased this home specifically because I could legally have my horses on this property (currently being boarded in a less than ideal barn) I verified this with the city's stable inspector prior to purchasing the home My residence is 2 5 acres; the land is gently sloped, cleared and has a small service shed According to Section 5 -104 Subsection Al of the Chanhassen city code, "Minimum acreage for three horses shall be 2 acres, and an additional one -third acre shall be required for each additional horse " I have 4 horses, this requires a minimum acreage of 2 34 acres and I have 2.5 acres (Please verify with attached survey) Rightly so, the city of Chanhassen requires at least a 3 sided structure in order to issue a stable permit I would like to do one better and construct a four -sided steel barn The barn would be 30ft across, 48ft long and 12ft tall I have a reputable builder and will comply with all building codes The color scheme I chose even matches a neighboring barn down the block I am allowed 1000sq ft of accessory structure by city code (updated in 2007) Asa veterinary professional and expert in the field, 1000sq ft is not adequate to house 4 horses, their equipment and hay I am requesting a variance of 507sq ft of accessory building 440ft is from the barn I am proposing to build and 67sq ft is from a small service shed that is pre - existing on the property I explored the possibility of building a 2 story barn with a 1000 sq ft. foot print However there are two reasons why this option will not be sufficient First is the cost associated with building an inner structure that can hold 4 -6 tons of hay The second is housing the machinery (Hay Bale Elevator) needed to move 4 -6 tons of hay into the loft There is no room in the lower part of the 1000sq ft structure for the equipment That means the equipment would need to be left out in the open, creating an eye -sore and decreasing the working life of the equipment The significant practical difficulty complying with the zoning ordinance is described as follows In dealing with Minnesota winters, it is essential to store enough hay to last throughout the winter The hay needs to be kept dry and away from wildlife or else it will mold and become lethal to the horses Hay is available to purchase throughout winter, but it has been stored outside This hay is safe for cows, but as described above can be lethal to horses Also, horses are "hind -gut fermenters ". This means they use bacteria in their colon to break down hay particles and harvest the energy A by- product of a horse's digestion is heat. Therefore, in order to stay warm and fit a horse needs to be offered a high fiber forage at all times in an un- heated barn Given that horses are about 1000lbs, this is a large amount of hays According to my calculations based of the Carver County Extension Office web site, I will need 500sq ft of dry space to lay in enough hay to last 5 months (November- March) The remaining space is devoted to horse stalls and horse equipment (saddles, grain bins etc) (See provided drawings of proposed "Haverty Family Barn" layouts). This variance will not change the essential character of the neighborhood In fact, most homes on my block have even larger buildings (most pre 2007) 1 would be improving my property to better fit the neighborhood by constructing my barn Both my neighbors on either side of my home have nice barns with healthy horses There are also several others along the lane that also have barns and horses that are in compliance with the city too This variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter. Legally I am allowed to keep my 4 horses on my property, but I need a variance from code in order to adequately house them. The purpose of this variation is not based upon economic considerations, but on the halth and wellbeing of my horses This is a hardship unique to the property due to current city code and was not created by me, the land owner A simple remedy is to approve a variance from code This way both parties work together in harmony I have been and will continue working with the city in good faith I moved my horses almost 2,000mi to Minnesota and I look forward to finally bringing my horses home soon SCANNED LEGAL DESCRIPTION I hereby certify that this is a correct representation of a survey of- Lot 1 Block 1 JEURISSEN ADDITION Carver County Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. And that this survey and certificate was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Glen A Mullenbach MN License No 47470 Dated this 15th Day of October 2014 --•�E9 w co 0 30 60 F— W W f- = House H cD 0) is •z. >�+ FAN o s0v 3 w Q 109 °Q r7 � z l i 6 Z U \ acrmNwc 30 / 1 50.00- - N 00'37'33" W ]USE GRADING, EROSION 8 SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES M URV Y N C , uN Z I L L v I TT 1 OWNER SHALL APPLY FOR ANI NPDES PERMIT IF DISTURBED AREA EXCEEDS 1 (s„ , us Z NzwvvcnxcocHAA,w C I V I L D E S I G N ACRE. PROPOSED DISTURBED AREA IS 0.22 ACRES AN NPDES PERMIT WILL NOT '^°" ux tsml sse - +�+s unn w-uu c N BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT BENCHMARK � a 2 STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE DRAINS TO THE SOUTH AND EVENTUALLY ZONING INFORMATION' � a w EMPTIES INTO BLUFF CREEK WHICH IS AN IMPAIRED WATER WITHIN 1 MILE OF THE ZONING DISTRICT- A2 AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT SITE. 3 - N PROPERTY LINEg., 3. ALL DOWN- GRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR PROPERTY AREA. 108,853 SQ.FT = 2.50 ACRES SETBACK LINE TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBING OPERATIONS. ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS AREA = 20% = 21 771 SQ.FT = 0.50 AC >^ 4. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS ON SITE INCLUDING STOCKPILES SHALL BE 8 a A 3 � C STABILIZED NO LATER THAN SEVEN DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 7 8% = 8 480 SQ.FT = 0 19 AC 3 THAT AREA HAS CEASED DRIVEWAY = 5,414 SQ.FT 0 8 rc HOUSE = 1,879 SQ.FT a w 5 PERMANENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: SHED = 67 SQ.FT p SLOPE ARROW • SEED AND FERTILIZER APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS. SIDEWALKS = 444 SQ.FT PATIO = 508 SQ.FT FIRE RING = 168 SQ.FT Z �w • STRAW MULCH MATERIAL APPLIED AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE AND 3 DISC ANCHORED INTO PLACE. NEW IMPERVIOUS =$.7% =4,010 SQ.FT= 0.09 AC FUTURE DRIVEWAY a 2,570 SQ.FT 6. THE FOLLOWING SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED ON THIS BARN = 1 440 SQ.FT s SITE: a zO PROPOSED TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS = 11.5% = 12,490'SQ.FT = 0.29 AC - E • SILT FENCE CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARD PLATEINO 5300 & - C7 • TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 6 g STANDARD PLATE NO. 5301 9 —sue— s c CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARD PLATE NO 5304 :ZT% o N Db37'33" W E. LINE OF THE NEt /d OF SEC. 16. TVrP 116, RGE. 23 659.09 DRAINAGE. AND 1 _ LI Y_ E N N %an x�a6POeAn y _ _- I- os (1,dao�Frl� LOTS BLOCK 1 BENCHfAARK -- HUe 89141 '. .. vi ... -.. ri INAG AN ti N EA MENT - -48112 N 054218 W on OF CHANHASSEN LOT 2 RECEIVED DEC 19 2014 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT LEGEND EXISTINGq s • IRON PIPE s BENCHMARK -- -- METAL FENCE a w -- - - -- ELECTRIC FENCE �I d 3 - N PROPERTY LINEg., y SETBACK LINE =wo C WELL MAJOR CONTOUR '� s 8 rc MINOR CONTOUR s SLOPE ARROW Z �w 3 o Z C9 zO PROPOSED zLEGEND Q E -1- MAJOR ;CONTOUR C7 z - —sue— MINOR CONTOUR :ZT% SLOPE ARROW m > 3 GRAVEL SURFACE °o y CO a � B SHEET NO. 1 1 OF 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on January 8, 2015, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for 750 West 96t' Street Variance Request — Planning Case 2015 -02 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon, that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records 4rJ En elh rdt, Dip ty Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2015 �ta T EUWSSEN Nry �':.bhc- Minnesota Nota C:xpires Jan 31, 2020 NWWVW�Mtr�l1N Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 7 00 p m This hearing may not start until later in the evening depending on the order of the agenda Location Cit Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd Request for Variance for accessory structure in excess of 1,000 Proposal: square feet on approximately 2 5 acres of property zoned A ricultural Estate A -2 Applicant Carissa & Steve Haverl erty 750 West 96th Street A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps at the Meeting: 1 Staff will give an overview of the proposed project 2 The applicant will present plans on the project. 3 Comments are received from the public 4 Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at www ci chanhassen mn us/2015 -02 If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI -Jaff Questions & by email at sallaff(5ci Chanhassen mn us or by phone at 952 - Comments 227 -1134 If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting Staff will provide copies to the Commission The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the City R Procedure Planning Commission meeting eview • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews Conditional and Interim Uses Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as apart of the hearing process The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. vote of the • Minnesota State Statute 519 99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s) • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council If you wish to have something to be included in the report please contact the Planning Staff person named on the nntifi —t- Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time. Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 7 00 p m This hearing may not start until later in the evening depending on the order of the agenda Location: Citv Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd Request for variance for accessory structure in excess of 1,000 Proposal- square feet on approximately 2 5 acres of -Agricultural Estate (A-?) property zoned Applicant: Carissa & Steve Haverl Property 750 West 96th Street Location A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to Inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps at the Meeting 1 Staff will give an overview of the proposed project 2 The applicant will present plans on the project. 3 Comments are received from the public 4 Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at www ci Chanhassen mn us/2015 -02 If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI -Jaff Questions & by email at saliaff(a)ci Chanhassen mn us or by phone at 952 - Comments. 227-1134 If you choose to submit written comments, It is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting Staff will provide copies to the Commission The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the City Review Procedure Planning Commission meeting • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as apart of the hearing process The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s) • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council If you wish to have something to be included in the report please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. BRADLEY C WORM CHARLES E & SANDRA R WORM DOUGLAS L & PAULA JO STEEN 750 96TH ST W TRUS 701 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8603 760 W 96TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8603 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8603 GARY J & MARY LANE BENDZICK 731 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8603 JAMES R & SHARON M HEDBERG 750 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8671 ROBERT & BETTY WOLD 730 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8671 GREGORY M FALCONER 720 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8603 LESLIE L O'HALLORAN 710 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8603 ROBERT A & ELIZABETH K HAAK 770 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8671 JAMES M & TERESA A BYRNE 700 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8603 RICHARD A & BETTY A DERHAAG 711 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8603 STEVEN J & SANDRA R KADISAK 810 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8673 TIMOTHY A & DAWNE M ERHART WESLEY & CAROL DUNSMORE WILLIAM F & MARY E HEINLEIN 9611 MEADOWLARK LN 730 96TH ST W 721 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8695 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8603 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8603