2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form4t Metropolitan Council
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
Please complete the following information. When completing this form electronically, fields in grey need your input.
Use the Tab key to quickly navigate to each field. Question 37 on the last page of this form is for MUSA Expansions or
Changes only and does not contain grey fields, but is directly editable. The form for Question 37 is also available in
Excel format. htti)://www.metrocouncil.orq/[)Ianning/assistance/resources.htm
This form is available in electronic format on the Metropolitan Council's website:
htto://www.metrocouncil ora/planning/assistance/resources htm.
AMENDMENT NAME CSAH 61 Corridor
COMMUNITY PROFILE AND AMENDMENT OVERVIEW
1. Please provide the following information:
Local governmental unit: City of Chanhassen
Contact name: Kate Aanenson.AICP
Contact title:
Community Development Director
Address:
7700 Market Boulevard, P. O. Box 147
City, State, Zip:
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Telephone number:
_(952) 227-1139
FAX number:
_(952)227-1110
Email address
kaanensonnaci.chanhassen.mn.us
Date of preparation: February 24, 2017
2. Identify the type of amendment and describe. Check all that apply: a
® 2a. Land use change: Amend the land uses within the CSAH 61 corridor in Chanhassen.
❑ 2b. MUSA expansion or change:
® 2c. Text Change: Amend Figures 2-1 and 2-2 of the Land Use Element
❑ 2d. Other:
3. Provide a description of the amendment:
Location: CSAH 61 corridor in southern Chanhassen
The County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 61 Corridor is a key southern gateway to the City of
Chanhassen. Impending transportation and infrastructure changes can increase the development
potential of parcels within the corridor. The city completed a framework plan that will guide future
public and private -sector decision making, shaping this important city gateway. The City of
Chanhassen initiated the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study to investigate future land use
Brief description: recommendations consistent with the gateway's importance.
Affected area, in acres: 288
Number of housing units in CPA area, if any: 8 existing
May 2011 1
it Metropolitan Council
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
SECTION 1: PROCESS OVERVIEW htti)://www.metrocouncii.org/planning/LPH/LPHSectl.i)d
4. Indicate the official local status of the plan amendment. Check all that apply.
NOTE: The local governing body must take action on the proposed amendment before submittal to the
Metropolitan Council.
Action Date of Action
® Acted upon by the planning commission. _February 3, 2015
® Approved by governing body, contingent upon
Metropolitan Council review February 23, 2015
S. List the adjacent local governments, school districts, and other jurisdictions that were
contacted and the date the copies were sent. Notifying adjacent governmental units and affected
school districts is one of the criteria the Council will use to determine whether an application is deemed
complete for review.
City of Eden Prairie, City of Shorewood, City of Excelsior, City of Victoria, City of Shakopee, Hennepin County, Carver
County, Scott County, Jackson Township, Minnetonka School District, Eastern Carver County School District, City of
Chaska, City of Minnetonka, Minnesota Department of Transportation. December 12, 2014.
6. Identify outstanding issues or conditions made in the Metropolitan Council's review of the
municipality's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update or subsequent comprehensive plan
amendments:
® The Council's review(s) did not identify any issues or conditions.
❑ The Council's review(s) identified the following issues/conditions:
Issue/Condition Steps taken or future planned actions, including date
7. Will/has and environmental review (Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Environmental
Impact Statement, or Alternative Urban Areawide Review) be/been completed for this site?
® No, none required.
❑ Yes. Indicate the type of review and approximate date of completion. If completed, include a
summary of the findings below:
May 2011 2
4t Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
SECTION 2: '7, FORECASTS..
8. Does the plan amendment change the population, household, or employment forecasts that
appear in the Metropolitan Council's published forecast tables? Published forecast tables can be
found online on the Council's website: lith:lvr;_°. n;ttit,cc�:n<il coca/inetroarea/stats htrn. Please note
that the Council's practice is to round forecasts to the nearest hundred.
No, no change in community -level forecasts. This plan amendment enables development that is
❑ already assumed in current, approved forecasts.
® Yes. Identify the net changes to community -level forecasts in the table below:
Net Changes to Community -level Forecasts (additions or reductions due to the amendment)
2010
Population
Households
2020 2030
1,715
747
Employment I 1 1 -1468 1
t,
•Item #10 Land Use
•Item #11 Housing
•Item #12 Critical Area / MNRRA
•Item =13 Trip Generation
•Item =22 Wastewater Flow
•Item =32 Water Supply
SECTION 3: LAND USE http://www.metrocouncii.orq/t)lanning/LPH/LPHSect3.i)df
9. Does the plan amendment propose any impacts to wetlands located on the site?
❑ No wetlands on the site.
❑ No, no impacts to wetlands located on the site.
® Yes. Describe the type of wetland(s), potential impacts, and mitigation plans below:
Potential impacts will be determined and reviewed as part of development proposals in the future. The City will comply with
the Wetland Conservation Act and city code requirements.
10. Describe land use changes in acres applicable to this amendment site in the table below.
Use the community's land use categories as contained in the local comprehensive plan.
❑ Not applicable. No land use changes proposed.
Land Use Designation (fill in All Land Uses in CPA Area Residential Land Uses Only
,ho c -if;, I—A A.-__
use categories) Pre -CPA Post -CPA Pre -CPA Post -CPA
--- _
Agricultural 847 824
Office
159
100
Office Industrial
82
42
Park & Open Space
Mixed Use (assume 70% residenfial/30%
42
52
commercial)
0
29
0, 10 units/cc.
171, 10 units/ac.
Residential Large Lot
39
16
16, 0.4 units/ac.
7, 0.4 units/ac.
Residential Medium Density
0
90
0, 4-8 units/ac.
458, 4-8 units/ac.
Residential High Density
67
82
572, 8-16 units/ac.
699, 8-16 units/ac.
May 2011 3
ItIt Metropolitan Council
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
Totals 1,256 1256 588 _ 1,335
CPA = Comprehensive Plan Amendment
11. Housing: If the proposed amendment changes the amount of land city-wide staged for
development for the 2011-2020 timeframe for medium density, high density, or mixed use residential
development, complete the following table to identify the amount of land available pre- and post -
amendment.
Acres city-wide for each land use
category
Pre -CPA
Fill in all land use categories Developed Developable
that allow multi -family Total Acres Acres Acres*
residential development A B A— B= C
* Developable means land planned for urban residential development, infill, or
** Amendment acres from the municipality's response to Question #10 above.
Acres city-wide for each
land use category
Post -CPA
Amendment Developable
Acres** Acres
D --C+D.=E_�
2011-2020 timeframe.
12. Mississippi River Critical Area / MNRRA: Does the proposed amendment include any land within
the designated Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) and Critical Area boundaries?
® No. Not a community with CA / MNRRA boundaries or project site is not within CA / MNRRA
boundaries.
❑ Yes. Describe below how Critical Area guidelines and MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan
policies are being addressed with this amendment.
SECTION 4: TRANSPORTATION httD://www.metrocounril.ora/nlanninci/I_PH/I. PHSert4-ndf
13. Trip Generation: Complete the table below using the most recent edition of the Institute of
Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual to show whether this plan amendment increases or
decreases trip generation compared to the planned land use and transportation element of the
community's comprehensive plan.
Estimated average daily traffic
Trip Generation for the Site
Based on Planned Land Use
Pre -Amendment_
29,755
Trip Generation for the Site
Based on Planned Land Use
Post -Amendment
25,737
Estimated peak hour traffic I a.m. 3,758, p.m. 3,724 a.m. 3,195, p.m. 3,145
14. Will these changes require improvements to the existing local and regional road network
or to interchanges beyond what is in the community's current transportation plan?
❑ No, existing local and regional road networks can accommodate increase.
® Yes, improvements are needed. Describe improvements and who will pay for them below:
Local street access to CSAR 61 will be needed at the time of development. CSAR 61 is currently under construction to
improve traffic flows. The 101 river bridge is currently under construction to four lanes with a pedestrian trail to improve
capacity and raise out of 100 year flood elevation. Highway 101 from CSAH 61 to Pioneer trail is being studied for
improvements. Carver County, Chanhassen and MnDOT will all participate in the upgrade of this roadway.
May 2011 4
tMetropolitan Council
'L Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
15. If this site has direct access to a Principal or "A" Minor Arterial, is the location and
spacing consistent with applicable County guidelines or MnDOT's Access Management
Guidelines? (�ll L{5_ 1 �. �T.GIf 'ict/91_ le.�i)
❑ Not applicable. No direct access to a Principal or "A" Minor Arterial.
❑ No. Explain:
® Yes. Describe below:
Local street access will be developed to CSAH 61.
16. Will the amendment increase or decrease by 10% or more the 2030 forecasted
households, population, or employment forecasts allocated to the development's Traffic
Analysis Zone (TAZ)?
❑ Yes. ® No. If Yes, explain below:
Transit and Other Modes of Transportation
17. Is the amendment likely to have any impact, positive or negative, on transit service?
® No, not currently served by transit or will not affect transit.
❑ Yes. List existing routes, describe changes, and identify proposed/necessary transit facility
improvements (e.g. shelters, park & rides, etc) below:
18. Does the amendment include Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies or land use
and urban design measures, if applicable?
❑ Yes. ® No.
If No, explain why not. If Yes, describe below (e.g. car and van pooling, flexible work hours, mixed land
uses that discourage vehicle trips and promote walking, biking, ridesharing, and transit):
Development strategies will be determined at the time of development review.
19. Does the amendment include any pedestrian or bicycle access or facilities?
❑ Yes. ® No. If No, explain why not. If yes, describe access/facilities below:
May 2011 5
44d Metropolitan Council
'7e
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
20. Does the amendment affect any airport functions?
® Not applicable. Site is not within airport compatibility area or search area.
❑ No. The site is within airport compatibility area or search area, but no impacts. Explain below:
❑ Yes. The CPA site is within an airport compatibility area or search area, and experiences off -airport
impacts related to the following:
❑ Aircraft Noise. Describe whether the community has adopted land use compatibility guidelines,
including preventive and corrective noise abatement and/or mitigation measures being applied.
❑ Airport Safety Zoning. Indicate whether the community participates on a joint
airport/community zoning board, has an approved airport zoning ordinance, and how those
requirements relate to the proposal.
❑ Airport Infrastructure. Describe how the proposal affects or is affected by the provision of
services or facilities to the airport (e.g. roads, utilities, police/fire, etc.).
SECTION 5: WATER RESOURCES htti)://www.metrocouncii.orQ/i)lanning/LPH/LPHSect5.ipdf
Wastewater'
21. What type of wastewater treatment will be used to serve the proposed amendment?
❑ Individual Sewage Treatment System (ISTS)
❑ Privately Owned/ Community Treatment System
❑ Local/ Municipal Owned Wastewater Treatment Plant
® Regional Wastewater Treatment
22. Wastewater Flow: Complete the following table to show whether the amendment increases or
decreases wastewater flow compared to the currently planned land use and sewer flow projections.
I Total Community Flow Total Community Flow
Year Pre -Amendment (mgd) Post -Amendment (mgd)
2010 1 4.46 I 4.46
May 2013 6
4t Metropolitan Council
"7� Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
2020 5.96 5.96
2030 7.3 7.3
- -
mgd =million gallons per day
23. Does the local wastewater system have adequate capacity or staged capacity to
accommodate the proposed amendment?
® Yes. ❑ No. Explain response below:
City untertook a Utility feasibility study in conjunction with the proposed amendment.
24. Does the regional wastewater system have adequate capacity or staged capacity to
accommodate the proposed amendment?
® Yes. ❑ No. Explain response below:
25. Has the community and/or Metropolitan Council identified an inflow and infiltration (I/I)
problem?
® Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, describe steps taken to address the I/I issue and plans for action below:
City has drafted a five year work plan. City working with Metropolitan Council to televise sewer mains to determine UI
problem areas. City is undertaking UI program including sewer line replacement, community education, specifying UI
resistant manhole structures, etc.
26. Identify regional interceptor(s) that will be impacted by these changes and indicate if
flows will be diverted from one interceptor service area to another below.
Lake Ann
27. Does the amendment include any wastewater flow to an adjacent community? For new
inter -community agreements, the receiving community must also amend the sewer element of its plan.
❑ Yes. Enclose a copy of the inter -community agreement with the amendment submittal.
® No.
28. Will stormwater runoff generated from the amendment be treated on-site?
❑ No. Check one of the following and describe:
❑ Runoff will not receive treatment. Describe below:
❑ Runoff will be treated off-site. Identify off-site treatment facility below:
May 2011 7
it
Metropolitan Council
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
® Yes. Describe type and level of on-site pollutant removal treatment/mitigation plans below:
At the time of development, General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity
Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination" (NPDES construction permit) will be required and a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be developed.
29. Does the community an updated local surface water management plan?
® Yes. Year adopted: 2006 ❑ No. Explain below:
In processing of updating plan in compliance with Water Management Organizations.
30. Does the community have an adopted erosion control or stormwater management
ordinance?
® Yes. Year adopted: 1992 ❑ No. Explain below:
Storm water management ordinance updated in 2008. Erosion control ordinance updated in 2011. In process of updting
storm water management ordinance in compliance with the current NPDES permit.
31. Does the community have an updated water supply plan?
® Yes. Year adopted: 2008 ❑ No.
32. Will the amendment increase or decrease projected water use from the community's
current water supply plan?
❑ Yes. Provide the water supply plan amendment as an attachment to describe necessary facilities
improvements or changes.
® No increase or decrease in projected water use from the water supply plan.
SECTION.htti)://www.metrocouncil.org/i)lanning/LPH/LPHSect6.i)d
33. Does the amendment include, or is it adjacent to or within +/2 mile of an existing or
planned regional park, reserve, or trail as identified in the Metropolitan Council's 2030
Regional Parks Policy Plan?
® Yes. ❑ No.
If Yes, indicate the name of the regional park, reserve, or trail and describe potential impacts and
mitigations plans below:
City will provide local connections to trails on the Hennepin County Regional Trail corridor, the CSAH 61 corridor and the
101 riverbridge.
34. Does the community have a Parks & Open Space Plan including regional park elements?
® Yes. Year adopted:
2008 ❑ No.
May 2011 8
tMetropolitan Council
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
SECTION 7: IMPLEMENTATION htti):ZZwww.metrocouncil.orq/l)lanning/LPH/LPHSect7.1)d
35. Will the amendment require changes in zoning or subdivision ordinances, the capital
improvement program (CIP), or other official controls?
® Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, describe proposed changes and timeline for making those changes below:
The properties will need to be rezoned at the time of development. This land is outside the current urban services area.
Utility services will need to be extended to this area to accommodate the future development.
36. Does the community have natural resources protection ordinances, including those
addressing wetlands, tree preservation, or steep slopes?
® Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, identify applicable ordinances below:
The city has adopted wetland protection, shoreland management, tree preservation, bluff protection and Bluff Creek overlay
ordinances.
DON'T FORGET!
A complete comprehensive plan
amendment submittal must include the
following:
❑ Completed CPA Submittal Form
❑ Staff report regarding CPA
❑ Other relevant information related to the
CPA
And the following color maps:
❑ General location of CPA
❑ Current planned land use
❑ Proposed planned land use change
❑ Current sewer staging
❑ Proposed sewer staging changes
❑ Existing land cover (MLCCS if available)
May 2011
_ >
co
O C a7C'c m
O p Z C 5 +
R U W O \ a
U a) a)
C Ii
O >T 0 0 roo Y C N w
C E -o _N �_ Z 9 U 90
1
v9+ A
a. EC f0 a) R II
Q) E -C H
C
a O N N
N O Y y
�L C w+Ti WCL
'LJ 0 R N LA V1 �• Q
° ai � ° a) CL VY>C 7
[P C E Io 'O Q O OI R
�, E 'O J
O C
o u �
0
oE vI ° vi yO,
r a
off C'V y c d 'a
a,R y dI `u: M w
> o m c y a s
E° C) c o d a
c E0
a O a C
C O Y I V C a)
E
cc) u.), F awl G L Y G IVO w
0 L _c¢am0uaj
m a, +' a
° v io aa)i C 'i L. a
��c�ou C .cp -0
m y a) m- Q y c+� y
w-0 C 0. u� R9 p
o3'moo�Ol a v3o
C N v cc ° e u a 3� m
>,Fm 75
o 0 O G N R
D a+ N ip u u
v�Qj���i R �c�
L N p C to V N L
a.. •p D) o :n ,y O N •N
+�+ I 'p Vi E V) � J I V W
O Imp C) E C C 'U Ecl c:= LL = �' w, Y7
U - c c = - o
> m ° o+c+ d g mtt� m
c E C U R uI a
'''ai
Y O d £ L
h a n 3 = r
�m/Co- 0 fu cc c. Q'Eo� a
C
v E o dw v inLML
t N n C O O R O L;
v E o ° O.� c _..,
Ol p� 'EO N v .2.
R R R -1
o N
C Xa
o+-o,oa'wgmc >
{A CP ia) M > m m
O L y O 0)Qj
c u
O CTC R r N ul Q
m�aj��C= c
Y Q) Y L 3 L Y
C v w u a. c
Lu r.+>"OA R E E OI
a v c 3� O i CL E
(A E .0 3 !n R u c O q'
�oa>v0Wa >zl
c' F
>E>> O1 Of D
M-0 Ov �UaZaL+ cc,
Fe
1
d
Lu
O v
L
a •yI a
b
Y C w
o
N
9
a)
n
L
v
N
0 w u
m
Q C N
Y
Q �
O
c
O
�
J
I
>
O
i
m
i i
v
ya v
Y
E'�a
V
OI a
W > p
o
D
m
u
Iv
I
o
'a)ca
1 V N N
y
a � m
a
YamU
E� a
f a°
-
o �aG
M
'..
—
o
y
= ';.
l o u
o
41"
R
'o>
�
La3y
s9co
yu
o
mC co
o f
H C R
,rcoa
7'�i,
o�
iui
o m
a7'
J
rA V
a'i
a
d a a
rIA
O I,I
o
0
O 0
ITE
m O
�
N N
d
@ N
na
p'
m
�E
J U
mg
O1 Iu
In
s
c
i
•c
� �
p m
J
d
Fe
1