Loading...
PC Staff Report 04-07-2015CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC DATE: 4/7/2015 CC DATE: 4/27/2015 REVIEW DEADLINE: CASE #: 2015-08 BY: Al-Jaff, et al. 6/13/2015 "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Preliminary Plat with Variances to replat of 2.74 acres into four lots, Redstone Ridge, on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 6341 and 6400 Teton Lane; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval to replat 2.74 acres into four lots and a variance to allow neck lots. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. LOCATION: APPLICANT: 6341 and 6400 Teton Lane Southeast of the intersection of Teton Lane and Bretton Way Chris May 6400 Teton Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 P: 612-386-5055 E: cmay427(agyahoo.com City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Single Family Residential District 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (Net Density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 2.74 Acres (119,667.92 square feet) DENSITY: 1.4 Units per Acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. ..... . . . . . . . Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 2 of 12 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to subdivide 2.74 acres into four single family lots. The property is zoned RSF, Single Family Residential District. The site contains two single-family homes (built in 1956 and 1989), swimming pool and a detached garage which are proposed to remain. Access to the site is gained via existing driveways off of Bretton Way and Teton Lane. The site consists of two parcels with existing single-family homes and two remnant unbuildable lots. The applicant is proposing to replat those lots into four single family lots. - Ashton - t ..,ria..-.. _.r,....--..-.� ... ... ♦. •• _ .. e :Ir 17, a Ae Ail Bretton Wad46 � ` P 401 r . w. � �. ♦ � �' r! � Obi i ' b i. 341 TETON L The southeast corner of the intersection of Bretton Way and Teton Lane is an unutilized right-of- way. The applicant is requesting vacation of the right-of-way. Staff is recommending approval of the vacation (the vacation of the right-of-way requires City Council action only). Approval of the subdivision will be contingent upon approval of the vacation. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 3 of 12 The variance in this application is to allow a neck lot. The subdivision ordinance requires a variance be granted in order to allow a neck lot. Staff is recommending approval of the variance to minimize grading. This issue is discussed in detail later in the report. Staff has been working with the applicant for several months. Several development scenarios were examined. Staff directed the applicant to show how the site would develop if a public street was constructed. This public street concept can serve four home site; however, it mass grades the site and removes most of the vegetation. The average lot size is 29,916 square feet with a resulting gross density of 1.4 units per acre and net density of 1.5 units per acre. All lots meet the minimum area, width, and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The site contains a bluff along the south portion. The required tb k ' 11 b d Bretton i i Xt , tt e X9 X 9:99 21 y; �✓ , ref X=7 t t ti. =7 ! X90 X1 is N ##Mis" PAO X 9P.9 06 # - - tom _ _. 996, Y S C 14 Area : 76,777.54 F • �,� _T r�`r! l/ I,d t__ --ti. -- �i�1+1► 'cam y NO\\ dam,X !%4 i9 Q54 St je.. X.4 X W� &I XIC07 OR fox 01si K7y X) 04..Y8 7'S jq Xfo 5, XICtr 62 a -.c� rhe . '�.. s " ,.. X1= 2 p s�.t d XMi 58 .� I 525 71X to Y' Xt f F N e'4.�1Y4li�i.-N] LLiI ,., x `+• �(fi? .'� r *vim �� +37, rjg,6 23 S -r14 1 _ _ _.. ;0W 02 J7- _ f1trMi 77.w /+` Y' x � 'ti's'-•, ��. V ,.—.. .. •.— + - •"` —' atY �K � � _ -' - .•�,.. _ il �`' .-..: a� •^-..rte . ni..r~ �`� ^•.. ^..� .• ` ... .. -, E _ — X5+55. PC ?+'3r 962 JG W0.lJ11J W111 VG 1110.1111Ct111GU from the edge of the bluff. Public Street Option The site has mature trees which the applicant is making an effort to preserve. In summary, staff believes that the proposed subdivision is well designed. We are recommending that it be approved with a variance to allow a neck lot with conditions outlined in the staff report. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 4 of 12 PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 2.74 acre site into four single-family lots. The gross density of the site is 1.4 units per acre and net density is 1.5 units per acre. All four lots exceed the minimum 15,000 square feet of area, with an average lot size of 29,916 square feet. All four proposed lots meet the minimum width, and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The maximum hard surface coverage permitted in the RSF District is 25%. The applicant has not shown these calculations for Lots 3 and 4. Approval of the subdivision is conditioned upon the applicant demonstrating that the hard surface coverage does not exceed 25%. The applicant is proposing one neck lot (Lot 3). Neck lots require a variance. The applicant has demonstrated that there will be less environmental impact through the use of a neck lot. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS The preliminary plat incorporates a 500 square -foot segment of public right-of-way into the northwest corner of Lot 1. Staff is working with the developer on a title search of that City right- of-way platted as RLS 11, Tract C to determine the feasibility of vacating that right-of-way. The standard 10 -foot at front and 5 -foot drainage and utility easements shall be granted around Ahe perimeter of the parcels as shown on the preliminary plat. The western side -yard drainage and utility easement on Lot 4 shall be 10 feet wide to accommodate future maintenance of the storm sewer that runs along that property line. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 5 of 12 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site currently has four parcels. Two of these parcels are unbuildable in their present configurations. The applicant is proposing to subdivide to make four buildable lots. Two will include the existing houses and the other two will become available building sites. The site decreases in elevation from north to south. The grade change is gradual for the first 400 feet or so and then bluff conditions are present. The bluff is currently wooded. The remainder of the site is maintained as lawn. Soils on the site consist of Lester -Kilkenny loams as identified in the United States Department of Agriculture Web Soil Survey. The soils on the site fall into the B hydrologic soils group and would be conducive to infiltration. The plans shall show the first -floor elevations of existing buildings on adjacent properties. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The proposed design maintains the same overall drainage pattern as existing. The site maintains the same setbacks from the bluff area. The grading plans shall be revised to show the proposed elevations at each lot corner and at the corners of the proposed structures. Draintile service must be provided for Lots 1 and 2 where runoff will flow from the back to the front of the lot. A soils report is required indicating soil conditions, permeability, slope and water level if detected. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL This project will not exceed the one (1) acre threshold for an NPDES Construction Permit and therefore does not require a SWPPP. However, it must meet Section 19-145 of City Code. Items that need to be corrected prior to final plat approval and any earth -disturbing activity includes the following: • The plan must indicate that all swales discharging off site are to have the final 200 feet stabilized and must indicate the method to be used. • The silt fence must comply with City Detail 5300 which requires the use of metal tee -posts. • The silt fence shown across Lots 3 and 4 must be placed twenty (20) feet from the top of the bluff to ensure that entire bluff impact zone is protected. • Inlet protection shall be shown on all existing catch basins with the potential to receive runoff from the site or tracked material. • Plan must demonstrate the placement of a rock construction entrance and include a detail. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 6 of 12 A note shall be made that no less than six (6) inches of topsoil must be placed to achieve the final grade and prior to the placement of any sod. The plan must show a stockpile area for stripped topsoil. The erosion escrow shall reflect this requirement. DRIVEWAY The grading plan shall label the elevation at the centerline of the proposed driveways. The plan must also label the proposed grade of the new driveway for the home on Lot 3. The driveway of Lot 1 must be located a minimum of 40 feet from the intersection of Teton Lane and Bretton Way. The location shown on the plan meets this minimum. The new driveway pavement being installed at Lot 3 may not exceed a width of 50 feet. Existing pavement may remain in place. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN Sanitary sewer and watermain were constructed under Teton Lane as part of the Curry Farms 2nd Addition development. New sanitary sewer and watermain service hook-ups are proposed for Lots 2 and 3. Escrow for the construction of these services and the associated restoration of part of Teton Lane will be collected with the Development Contract. STORM WATER UTILITY The Surface Water Utility Charges are calculated based upon land use type and land area. Credits may be applied based on storm water practices being implemented but as there are none proposed with the project, the fees will not be adjusted. The fee will be based upon the two newly created lots with a total area of 0.83 acre. The following table illustrates the Storm Water Utility Charges associated with the development of this parcel. Area Rate Total Water Quality 0.83 ac $2,990/ac $2,481.70 Water Quantity 0.83 ac $4,270/ac $3,544.10 Treatment BMP Credit 0.00 ac $2,830(0.5)/ac ($0.00) $6,025.80 ASSESSMENTS Partial water and sewer hookup fees will be due at the time of final plat; the remaining hook-up fees will be due with the building permit. The fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. PARKS This property is located within the neighborhood park service area for Curry Farms Park. Future residents of Redstone Ridge will have access to the park via a trail connection near the end of Teton Lane. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 7of12 Curry Farms Park is 6.82 acres in size and features a playground, basketball court, open play field, natural areas, small sledding hill and bituminous trails. Off-street parking is available at the park along Stratton Court. The amenities at the park have been updated within the past 10 years. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. TRAILS The subject site does not have direct access to a trail; however, convenient access to the Powers Boulevard and Lake Lucy Road bituminous trails is available via local streets. A trail connection from Teton Lane to Knob Hill Lane further enhances the pedestrian opportunities in this neighborhood. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. LANDSCAPING The applicant for the Redstone Ridge development has submitted tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. They are as follows: Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 8of12 Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 2.74 ac. or 119,354 SF Baseline canopy coverage 38% or 45,354 SF Minimum canopy coverage allowed 30% or 35,806 SF Proposed tree preservation 33% or 39,386 SF The developer meets minimum canopy coverage allowed. All adjacent uses are compatible with the proposed development and therefore no bufferyard plantings are required for this subdivision. COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Lot Lot Lot Home Area Width Depth Setback Ordinance 15,000 90' 125' 30' front/rear 10' sides BLOCK 1 Lot 1 15,12 8.52 110' 130' 30730' 10' Lot 2 21,058.05 90.34' 180' 30730' 10' Lot 3 57,191.04 190' 260' 30'/30'* 10' Lot 4 .26,290.31 102' 253' 30730' 10' Total 119,667.92 *The 30 foot bluff setback includes a 20 foot bluff impact zone. SUBDIVISION FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. Findin : The subdivision meets the intent of the city code subject to the conditions of the staff report and the PUD. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Findin : The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable plans. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 9of12 Findin : The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Findin : The proposed subdivision will be served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Findin : The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Findin : The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. 7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Findin : The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban infrastructure. VARIANCE FINDINGS Sec. 18-22. Variances. The City Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: Variance Findings For Neck Lot Section 18-57. Streets. (r) Flag lots may be permitted in residential districts with a density of less than four units per acre, if the criteria in variance Section 18-22 are met and upon consideration of the following: (1) The prevailing development pattern makes it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public/private street. In making this determination, the city may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence of wetlands. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 10 of 12 (2) After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public or a private street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. (3) The use of a flag lot will permit enhanced protection of the city's natural resources, including wetlands and protected areas. Staff reviewed the two possible plat layouts for the site and considered individual driveways off of a proposed cul-de-sac that can serve four home sites. Staff believes that the best option from an environmental standpoint is the neck lot option. The option of a public street and cul-de-sac serving the parcel requires severe grading of the site. Staff is recommending approval of the neck lot. Variance Findings Within Subdivisions The city may grant a variance from the regulations of the subdivision ordinance as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. Finding: The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. The proposed neck lot preserves significant site features. 2) The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. Finding: The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape and topographical conditions of the land. 3) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property. Finding: The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other properties due to the unique site features. 4) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. Finding: The granting of a variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance, and comprehensive plan. The applicant is proposing to create one neck lot. This option will minimize grading and tree removal. The applicant's request is reasonable. Staff is recommending approval of this request. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 11 of 12 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: "The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Preliminary Plat with a Variance for the use of a neck lot, to replat of 2.74 acres into four lots, Redstone Ridge, as shown in plans dated received February 14, 2015, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Redstone Ridge for the two new housing units only. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the city's 2015 single-family park fee of $5,800 per unit, the total park fees for Redstone Ridge would be $11,600. Engineering Conditions: 1. The plans shall show the first -floor elevations of existing buildings on adjacent properties. 2. The grading plans shall be revised to show the proposed elevations at each lot corner and at the corners of the proposed structures. 3. Draintile service must be provided for Lots 1 and 2 where runoff will flow from the back to the front of the lot. 4. A soils report is required indicating soil conditions, permeability, slope and water level if detected. 5. The plan must indicate that all swales discharging off site are to have the final 200 feet stabilized and the method to be used. 6. The silt fence must comply with City Detail 5300 which requires the use of metal tee -posts. 7. The silt fence shown across Lots 3 and 4 must be placed twenty (20) feet from the top of the bluff to ensure that entire bluff impact zone is protected. 8. Inlet protection shall be shown on all existing catch basins with the potential to receive runoff from the site or tracked material. 9. Plan must demonstrate the placement of a rock construction entrance and include a detail. 10. A note shall be made that no less than six (6) inches of topsoil, meeting the MnDOT specifications for 3877.2 Loam Topsoil Borrow must be placed to achieve the final grade and prior to the placement of any sod. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 12 of 12 11. The plan must show a stockpile area for stripped topsoil. 12. The erosion escrow shall be required reflecting the quantity of topsoil necessary to place six (6) inches over Lots 1 and 2 excluding the 25% hardcover allowed with the Development Contract. 13. The grading plan shall label the elevation at the centerline of the proposed driveways. 14. The plan must label the proposed grade of the new driveway for the home on Lot 3. 15. The new driveway pavement being installed at Lot 3 may not exceed a width of 50 feet. 16. Escrow for the construction of the new sanitary sewer and water services and the associated restoration of part of Teton Lane will be collected with the Development Contract. 17. Surface Water Management Utility fees totaling $6,025.80 shall be due at final plat. 18. Partial water and sewer hookup fees will be due at the time of final plat; the remaining hook- up fees will be due with the building permit. The fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. Environmental Resource Conditions: 1. Tree protection fencing will be required at the edge of grading limits near any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading. 2. Each lot will be required to have a minimum of one tree in the front yard. Planning Conditions: 1. Approval of the subdivision is contingent on approval of the right-of-way vacation. 2. All lots must maintain a maximum hard surface coverage of 25%." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Application. 3. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat. 4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. g:\plan\2015 planning cases\2015-08 redstone ridge sub var vac\staff report pc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Chris May for the following: 1. Preliminary Plat to replat of 2.74 acres into four lots with a variance to allow a neck lot — Redstone Ridge. On April 7, 2015, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Chris May for a Preliminary Plat with avariance —Redstone Ridge (Planning Case 2015-08). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned RSF, Single Family Residential District. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density (Net Density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre). 3. The legal description of the property is shown on the attached Exhibit A. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2. Lack of adequate roads. 3. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. In evaluating a variance, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: Section 18-57. Streets. (r) Flag lots may be permitted in residential districts with a density of less than four units per acre, if the criteria in variance section 18-22 are met and upon consideration of the following: (1) The prevailing development pattern makes it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public/private street. In making this determination, the city may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence of wetlands. (2) After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public or a private street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. (3) The use of a flag lot will permit enhanced protection of the city's natural resources, including wetlands and protected areas. 6. Sec. 18-22. Variances. The city council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. 2) The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. 3) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property. 4) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 7. The planning report #2015-08, dated April 7, 2015, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. 2 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with a Variance for the use of a neck lot, to replat of 2.74 acres into four lots, Redstone Ridge, as shown in plans dated received February 14, 2015. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 7th day of April, 2015. CHANHAS SEN PLANNING COMMISSION I:• Its Chairman Note: Proposed Building Pads Shown are 60' x 60' Surveyor's No te. The metes and bounds portion o f this legal description does not fit the ro er t p p p y as m n o um en t ed. All o f the exterior boundaries ore common with CURRY FARMS and CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION. This survey is consiston t with thep lot. PROPERTY DESCRIP TION.- Outlot ION: Outlot B and Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY FARMS 2ND A DDI TIONs County, Minnesota. Carver C n AND Tract B. Registered Land Survey No. 27, Carver County, Minnesota. y AND That part of the East Half o f the Northwest Quarter o f Sect ion 2 To n described as follows. w ship 116, Range 23, Commencing at a point on the West line of the East one half of the East one half of the said Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 which point is 1244.43 feet South of the North line of said Northwest Quarter, thence West andarallel with the .d Northwest Quarter 75 feeth • �° e Nor th line ° f said thence ce South and parallel w� th the East line of said North west Quarter 250 feet; thence East and parallel with the North line of said North wes t Quarter 190 feet; thence North and parallel with the East line of said North west Quarter 501.5 feet; thence West and parallel with the North li t ne of said Northwest Quarter to the West line of the East one half of the East• one half of said Nor th west Quarter; thence South along the said West line of the said East one half of East one half of Northwest Quarter to place of 9 be innin . 9 PROPOSED VA CA TED TE TON L ANE That part of Teton Lane that Iles: 1 Eas f erl y of the Northeasterly extension of the Nor th erl FARMS 2ND A DDI TION Carver County line of Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY y, Minnesota, according to the recordedP lot thereof. 2) Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Outlot B of said CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION. 3) Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Outlot B. AND 4) Westerly of the West line of said Outlot B. ii e ; ii�H } C I V E ..- - - -- , ____ - --- I ------ - I---,-------,- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECFIVED Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard FEB 13 201 ENMailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 cir"y 0F ��N Phone: (952) 227-1300 !Fax: (952) 227-1110 CHANHASSBPLANN I ING DEPT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Date Filed,.Alla 1, 1 60 -Day Review Deadline:. L EL Planner S� Ak- Case#6W6, 0? Section 1 Application Type (check all that apply) Comprehensive Plan Amendment ........... I ............. $600 R1 Subdivision 0 Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 C..'Oonditional Use Permit Ej single -Family Residence ................ ............... $325 0 All Others .............................. ........... .......... 1425 Interim Use Permit In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 AllOthers ......................................................... $425 [] Rezoning, D Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 El Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 ElAll Others ......................... ............................... $500 Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 Site Plan Review 0 Administrative .................................................. $100 El Commer-Cial/Industrial Districts* ...................... $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area Include number of existing employees: and number of new employees: El Residential Districts .................... I ...... I ............. $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit A, D�MONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign .................................. 2 0 a (City to install and remove) IL 4� ?) n Prope.,rty Owners'List within 500'. ...... . $3 per address (City , to generate — fee determined at pre- application meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents. document .C$56 Subdivision} (CUP/SPRMACNARNVAP/Metes & BounTstubrd s2n) LJ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 Create over 3 lots ....................... �$k $15 per lot �60 Metes & Bounds ......................... $300 + $50 per lot Consolidate Lots ..............................................$15 Lot Line Adjustment..... .................................... $150 FinalPlat* ..............................0......................... $250 *Requires additional $450 escrow for aftorney costs. Escrow will be required for other applications through the detteloprinent contract. [iVacation of Easements/Right-cif-way.. ......... L$300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Va. ri a n C9 - . .......................... __ .............. .. ........... ($200 Wetland Alteration Permit Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 AllOthers ....................................................... $275 F] Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 [I Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submiltal information that must accompany this application) TOTAL FEES: Received from: Date. Received., Check Number: Section 2: Required information Project Name: Redstone Ridge Piroper-til! Address or Location: 6341 and 6400 Teton Lane, Chanhassen, MN 55317 2,5.2630180,25,0021710,25.C,311104 Parcel Legal Description- earl. or E112 of Nkffl/4, 2-116-23 and Tract B, RILS 27 and L6 2, Curry Farms 2nd Atkin. 7- tn., 2,74 i okaA Acr(8-a�Wetlands Pre -sent? Present Zoning: RSF - Residential Single Family Present Land Use Designation: Residential Lov-i Densi-ty Existing Use of Property* Residential 0 "t -'es 0 No Requested Zoning: Requested Land Use Designation: Description of Proposal: Preliminary Plat for 4 lots - two new lots and two existing lots. E] Check box if separate narrative i attached SCANNED Aar"'PLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: -Chris May Contact: Address. 6400 Teton Lane Phone: City/State/Zip: Chanhassen, MN 55317 Cell: (612) 386-5055 Email: Av'ky Aar Z400%_ Fax: Signature'. Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Chris May Contact: Address: 6400 Teton Lane Phone: City/StatelZip. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Cell: (612) 335055 Email: 4V ex 74v- see 4 Fax: Signature: Date: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Otto Associates Engineers & Land Surveyors, Inc. Contact: Paul E. Otto, PLS, PE Address: 9 West Division Street Phone: (763) 682-4727 City/State/Zip: Buffalo, MN 55313 Cell: (763) 439-4115 Email: paul@ottoassociates.com Fax: (763) 682-3522 Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: Property Owner Via: Email Wtailed Paper Copy Name: Applicant Via: Email Mailed Paper Copy Address: Engineer Via: Q Email Q Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip.- [I Other* Via: E] Email [J Mailed Paper Copy Email: SCANNED Existing CB Rim=1000.75-•• -�. Benchmark: Inv=996.95 \ / - T, N. H. Elevotion=1006.65 \' 99J (N. G V. D. 1929) 0.00 :1/ 1 Son. MH S 1 Rim=1001.93- Ol, S 4 yY 1002.49 S� 0, 2" RCP ."."" /002 Existing CB Rim= 1000. - 000.80 _ In v= 995.26 X 1000. 4 1000.75 ;�.., ` 2 N88'4611 W g7• � Line parallel to the North line o/ the R'm=1000.35 - - - ..g� .��`�-iB99 �• NW 1/4 of Sec. 2, T. 116, R. 23. Inv= 987.29 o to ve SS Son. MH PROPOSED VACATED STREET _ I �C�61 S o`�S - " -Rim=994.92 SEE DETAIL B >Z .100 . •. � "• � ••' ;' Benchmark: /=174'49" 100 --y .• . .61gB Rsljs+ 6.50�.,r.•'SS.-...-..._T.N.H. • F X98. 4 - -" '^ rs Elevation=998.95 L=17.68 -" "_:_ -I _ - 7 �.� R-812, l / i3 -- G! ZLQ-T B of 9� (N. C V. D. 1929) yr Fence 38 feet South and 3-8 _ ! Tel. Ped fP ,b�SS feet East o/ property line - - 999 ' X I _ X "x / -T Pi r �o co 990.48 991.21 I rs Ecce 10.31;i`L Existing CB / ,� / O' - -I�_ I r • 9S X SS Rim=998.30 - 0 60 x\._ "Fence 33 "feet East °' ° In v-- 992.75 \ X998.95 99 I -of property"`.line p Existing CB Rim= 998.35 - I I rn 989.08 Inv -994.07 \ \ o I x X99708', Son. MH A, 2.9 o Rim=998.92-'­.1 �0 / ¢�\ (� 1000 999.3 In v= 988.06 PROPOSED / INVk o \ a HOUSE PAD a stn / '�" h � / •. 5'" Riser- \I x y X \001. $� k yc1 U 9 9.06 99 9 Qe D 1" S 04 1002 � 2 ° / � 7 pJ Area = 15,128.52 ),, r . M 10 X 1002.91 X 1002.82 / `L 5 U 'X83 ?g "1P• gn � I ° O : o m o c�\ vl ♦ * 3 PRt7PQ D 1004 _...._ - o N oo �� \1# 1H X � HOUSE D m X1004.51 X1004. f o 0 ,100 X10 4.2 a+ 5" Risers . 100 �' a, o I � 3 U) 1 I , Fountain -.I 'o i X 1006 I x o S CS 1 1 371 I X, lOp4.. 10 5.0 X I w ... S �1ic v _...�...-...f' ' XXIt I 004.10 X1006.6 / o 1 5 Wl line of the E 1/a of the 1004 E 1/2 of the NW Ilf4 of x X1007.08 o� i o o vers I Sec. 2, T. 116, R..2,3. 1008E Existing CB 1002.32 e -F rno sof t ��O g0 0 c X10G�3.�S I # 9 reo =„2� if58.0 S. F• r " Rim=1000.67-...-... _ 5 8;c e Q ......... E r Inv=987.27 NE e P II I / . `` d\ X 1004.95 X l 06.46 X 10 03 y X11%0 m fF=1Q04 0 % �!� X 1008.80 °' � X c.. z� k c C LA I II l R`et _ in Wiall 1010-, I X 1008. 15 roy �I FF= 1004.81Or SzFr.L., IIFF=1006.34 x X1004.5 0 House - v 58248525?"E 12i_24 --T 'If ,° ° \ X00 2 n X 1004.38 �' I .�0 0 0-o X1011.55 / o 0 iX1011.6 I � o FF=1006.25 00 Pavers I /' \ �Fe 1244.43 feet South of �n p ; a\ 0 / Fsnc�e Ire! , to "-the Norah line o/ l a) Existing House \ I I Pillors.....,, /2 w \ "+ NW 1 4 of Sec. 2,'"'r. .. 11, 1 rn 1 � X p0 4 i R. 23. X1000.5 4 i o O 3 X 1012.91 X996.58 rea = 26,290...31 So'overs X1012.95G998 ,, X 1003.05 S X1006.58 I o I I xos: , ...-Conc. 995.71X 5 h o I o -FF=1014.61 N X1013. (41 O �. X r o031 Area = 57,191.04 S F. I .9� 1. X1001. 15 ... +. Existing House `-Window Well O 0 .fl �.. \ 9 � v , •Doric. ". 6 I , 5 j o0 6 IE 1 , 1012" o .� `" 00 I o 6X1 1 I 1 l N 00 7 I 4 Retaining 010 , �PConc'. . �`fl Via,.- \ I °pin - `oo X1005.09 X 10 w 35 ., 1008 Landsc ,g I I •/ - .fl I" 1 6.71 X , 1 g66 I .. Re ain t in . i '• ^'" ,= andsc pin ....... 964.. I WIG/ avers, ,I ° ! \ X1005.02 82 96?. 'L 1. 00. X Pavers /,1004 !X999.38; ..� � .,7U ...- Steps- ., 22 3© Sluff Line" 100310X 4� 10. Pond Sfbrm M \ I 20�. U12 _996998 �- ;02 -990 996 t 10 - 990 -;�9� "..429"I!VTX 1000.72 16 2�� J Rini=979. 8 -..:` " 1 1 9881. I ...."Il -- 4:28......`:�".. ...... :�4,,' I" 994 Invz972.3 - See Oeta A..",... 0 ,J.+,.. � . 986 4" I,. 992 ... • 33 / r`.\ � , -. - 35 990 -X961 :. 980I 988 .. l inv=959.78 --.11 X962.96 �,\� 978.... _...." .....t... �_ �, .......... ..:::::: 44 .,,.. I 986. v . i� I.. ...,..984 ..... .... 976 ,.....'/•Ss 7b,....... 36 ......".: 45' . } 38 ... : 982 .... 974 - �i ,�.... I 40"' 980 - Storm MH �_ �•»-jAB z - Riser --Fence on property line gI / a Rini=974:6.2;;-Ferf�e""om"property-line,...". �4rd a6. 1 "" 9 N. Inv=?68.97-970��?c/'"`,,,.". _...g.iQ...".., d.39 \ - i........ 76 W. Inv= 959.50 g68 ST 4... c� �_______..�_r---- 9� E. Inv --959.42 .. g 6�t54.87X " 96 ne parallel " to the North line of the 6 20 E 1 d.00 966.. Line parallel to the East line of the / ST X96345 Fence - 9 "964 1 N /4 of `Sec. 2, T. 116, R. 23. _..' 6� NW 1/4 of Sec. 2, T. 116, R. 23. \ ST X961.17 g60. ..... �••.="Ngrtherly Line o%Qutl\D CURRY FARMS Srj l / Pond Inv= 958.07 -•�''I / DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I I �-5 I I 0 5 l^ ----3----J L BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AND BEING 5 FEET /N WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT, VICINI TY MAP no scale 01TY U CHANHASSU! RECEIVED FEB 13 201b 6==Am�- AREA = 2.74 ACRES ZONING = RSF - RESIDENTIAL SiNGLE FAMILY LEGEND - 1012 - denotes Existing Contour X100360 denotes Existing Spot Elevation denotes Hydront denotes Water Shut Off *7 denotes coniferous tree and tog number O 8 denotes deciduous tree and tog number - ST denotes Storm Sewer - SS denotes Sanitary Sewer denotes Building Setback line Front = 30' Side = 10' Rear = 30' Bluff = 30' Note: Proposed Building Pads Shown are 60' X 60' Surveyor's Note: The metes and bounds portion of this legal description does not fit the property as monumented. All of the exterior boundaries are common with CURRY FARMS and CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION. This survey is consistent with the plot. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Outlot B and Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota. AND Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 27, Carver County, Minnesota. AND That port of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the West line of the East one half of the East one half of the said Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 which point is 1244.43 feet South of the North line of said Northwest Quarter; thence West and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter 75 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Northwest Quarter 250 feet; thence East and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter 190 feet; thence North and parallel with the East line of said Northwest Quarter 501.5 feet; thence West and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter to the West line of the East one half of the East one half of said Northwest Quarter; thence South along the said West line of the said East one half of East one half of Northwest Quarter to place of beginning. PROPOSED VACATED TE TON LANE That part of Teton Lone that lies: 1) Easterly of the Northeasterly extension of the Northerly line of Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. 2) Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Outlot B of said CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION. 3) Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Outlot B. AND 4) Westerly of the West line of said Outlot B. .f REV. NO. I DATE BY DESCRIPTION DESIGNED DRAWN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR www.ottoassociates.com PROJECT NO: UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I T A DULY REDSTONE RIDGE PRELIMINARY PLAT P,E.O. T.J.B. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 9 West Division Street 14-0135 (763) THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHECKED D TTO (763)Buralo, 55313 CHRIS MAY 682-4-4 727 P. E. 0. Poul E. Otto SSOCIATES Fax: (763)682-3522 DATE: CHANHASSEN DATE: 2-13-15 LICENSE NO. 40062 Engineers & Land Surveyors, Inc: , MN SHEET NO. 1 OF 4 SHEETS 2-12-15 De toil A Westerly extension of the 1U) ...-North Line of Outlot B, 1 CURRY FARMS 21VD ADDITION. N88 46'11 "W 48 9 3 w\ N M 2B 16 PROPOSED VA CA TED STREET I N Q� AREA - 495.68 S.F.- - -- - Qv�A j \ � N h No Scale Corner falls 38'27"E 33.00 / Westerly extension of o o in Manhole- I N FARMS 2ND ADDITION. a), ­;c \/ Northeasterly extension � U /'�.. l of the Northerly Line of Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY 3 Qi / FARMS 2ND ADDITION. Storm MH .10��4� Rim = 979.78 -... i �►p /F in v= 972.53 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I I �-5 I I 0 5 l^ ----3----J L BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AND BEING 5 FEET /N WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT, VICINI TY MAP no scale 01TY U CHANHASSU! RECEIVED FEB 13 201b 6==Am�- AREA = 2.74 ACRES ZONING = RSF - RESIDENTIAL SiNGLE FAMILY LEGEND - 1012 - denotes Existing Contour X100360 denotes Existing Spot Elevation denotes Hydront denotes Water Shut Off *7 denotes coniferous tree and tog number O 8 denotes deciduous tree and tog number - ST denotes Storm Sewer - SS denotes Sanitary Sewer denotes Building Setback line Front = 30' Side = 10' Rear = 30' Bluff = 30' Note: Proposed Building Pads Shown are 60' X 60' Surveyor's Note: The metes and bounds portion of this legal description does not fit the property as monumented. All of the exterior boundaries are common with CURRY FARMS and CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION. This survey is consistent with the plot. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Outlot B and Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota. AND Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 27, Carver County, Minnesota. AND That port of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the West line of the East one half of the East one half of the said Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 which point is 1244.43 feet South of the North line of said Northwest Quarter; thence West and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter 75 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Northwest Quarter 250 feet; thence East and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter 190 feet; thence North and parallel with the East line of said Northwest Quarter 501.5 feet; thence West and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter to the West line of the East one half of the East one half of said Northwest Quarter; thence South along the said West line of the said East one half of East one half of Northwest Quarter to place of beginning. PROPOSED VACATED TE TON LANE That part of Teton Lone that lies: 1) Easterly of the Northeasterly extension of the Northerly line of Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. 2) Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Outlot B of said CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION. 3) Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Outlot B. AND 4) Westerly of the West line of said Outlot B. .f REV. NO. I DATE BY DESCRIPTION DESIGNED DRAWN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR www.ottoassociates.com PROJECT NO: UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I T A DULY REDSTONE RIDGE PRELIMINARY PLAT P,E.O. T.J.B. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 9 West Division Street 14-0135 (763) THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHECKED D TTO (763)Buralo, 55313 CHRIS MAY 682-4-4 727 P. E. 0. Poul E. Otto SSOCIATES Fax: (763)682-3522 DATE: CHANHASSEN DATE: 2-13-15 LICENSE NO. 40062 Engineers & Land Surveyors, Inc: , MN SHEET NO. 1 OF 4 SHEETS 2-12-15 Detail B Westerly extension of the No Scale ...-North Line of Outlot B, 1 CURRY FARMS 21VD ADDITION. N88 46'11 "W 48 9 2B 16 PROPOSED VA CA TED STREET I N AREA - 495.68 S.F.- - -- - Qv�A j f - - -- �--•. �� 2 38'27"E 33.00 / Westerly extension of o o the South Line of o; Ir Outlot B. CURRY ° O / FARMS 2ND ADDITION. a), ­;c \/ Northeasterly extension � U /'�.. l of the Northerly Line of Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY 3 Qi / FARMS 2ND ADDITION. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I I �-5 I I 0 5 l^ ----3----J L BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AND BEING 5 FEET /N WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT, VICINI TY MAP no scale 01TY U CHANHASSU! RECEIVED FEB 13 201b 6==Am�- AREA = 2.74 ACRES ZONING = RSF - RESIDENTIAL SiNGLE FAMILY LEGEND - 1012 - denotes Existing Contour X100360 denotes Existing Spot Elevation denotes Hydront denotes Water Shut Off *7 denotes coniferous tree and tog number O 8 denotes deciduous tree and tog number - ST denotes Storm Sewer - SS denotes Sanitary Sewer denotes Building Setback line Front = 30' Side = 10' Rear = 30' Bluff = 30' Note: Proposed Building Pads Shown are 60' X 60' Surveyor's Note: The metes and bounds portion of this legal description does not fit the property as monumented. All of the exterior boundaries are common with CURRY FARMS and CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION. This survey is consistent with the plot. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Outlot B and Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota. AND Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 27, Carver County, Minnesota. AND That port of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the West line of the East one half of the East one half of the said Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 which point is 1244.43 feet South of the North line of said Northwest Quarter; thence West and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter 75 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Northwest Quarter 250 feet; thence East and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter 190 feet; thence North and parallel with the East line of said Northwest Quarter 501.5 feet; thence West and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter to the West line of the East one half of the East one half of said Northwest Quarter; thence South along the said West line of the said East one half of East one half of Northwest Quarter to place of beginning. PROPOSED VACATED TE TON LANE That part of Teton Lone that lies: 1) Easterly of the Northeasterly extension of the Northerly line of Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. 2) Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Outlot B of said CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION. 3) Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Outlot B. AND 4) Westerly of the West line of said Outlot B. .f REV. NO. I DATE BY DESCRIPTION DESIGNED DRAWN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR www.ottoassociates.com PROJECT NO: UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I T A DULY REDSTONE RIDGE PRELIMINARY PLAT P,E.O. T.J.B. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 9 West Division Street 14-0135 (763) THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHECKED D TTO (763)Buralo, 55313 CHRIS MAY 682-4-4 727 P. E. 0. Poul E. Otto SSOCIATES Fax: (763)682-3522 DATE: CHANHASSEN DATE: 2-13-15 LICENSE NO. 40062 Engineers & Land Surveyors, Inc: , MN SHEET NO. 1 OF 4 SHEETS 2-12-15 Existing CB Rim= 1000.16 - 1 00.86 - In v= 995.26 1000.75 X 1000.74 --:- ��T Son. MH ` ~-~' i' -. `~ 99 � • 20 \ Rim=1000.35 -�• I In v= 987.29 SS \ h ' ^ SS �Ui o X999.61 SS `- SS ' --� -- SS �N�`'� -Son. MH 1000. 4 /� Safi Rim=994.92 X Benchmark: Ss .. T. N. H. / _••• Elevotion=998.95 X998,74 ; _ (N. G. V. D. 1929) to X 990.48 X999.4 1000 4 . o �. 999.21 �� 1 0�+ X995 42 rn C� \ Existing CB X Rim = 998.30 X 995.8 Inv=992.75 (JX X998.95 Existing C8 a S Rim = 998.35 - .� / tn� 989.08 N My=99 .07 8.3 i X997.08 .9 0 16. Son. MH � �' i - TF 10d� Rim=998.92 \ ,;p (y LL=996.30 M v= 988.06 Cl) 1 c r E� �� h O ? 0 30 60 m Z Feet / # 56 0 1. r X k 999.06 E 10(13.04 W Existing CB S� I X10030 Rim =1000.75 SS g9 Benchmark: Inv --996.95 \.\ / iC9/ X 1000 : i ` X 1002.91 X1002.82." LEGEND T. Devotion= 1006.65 \9.8? SS 9 S� 2 \ t (N. G. V. D. 1929) \ 9? Y 3: I 1004,OG-�"^. SF SF- denotes silt fence to be installed prior to construction t000 denotes proposed contour / 004.51 X 1004.75 .�� Son. MH / / �Zr�� 2 7F- 1005 8 X100425? c, Rim=1001.93 -... 0i 0 001.4 SZ 0 Q LL -994.8 ` X1004.3 denotes proposed spot elevation 0 3 FB hc, p �0� �o denotes proposed drainage s O¢........ SS 6 X 1001.'.7 1 01 X 1002.49 0• CS i S r , �� 0 /- 7 X 004.10 j Opy 3 X 1006.60 oll 5 9o? Mi p04 55 Q> I / X100708 1006 1002.32 0 outside g ode elevation O X 003.67 9 I ' 1 X 1 oo3. 10 X71994.96 X OOT1. X1006.. �Q� X 009. / # 10 1 * j X1008.80 = elevation G 10115 garage elevation # 11 TF 1014,0 top of foundation LL=1005.0 low level elevation ' X �. � X 1008.75 LO home t e FF=1006.34 -` X WO - wolkou t ,,,.,....,..................... X1004.53 �E Existing House FB - full basement 51 ;.... �e g ,AZO X1004.38 ypJt� ��J X,0 d X1011.55 X1011.62 i ' ,. 5 I 60' wide x 60' deep house pod FF=1006.25 J Existing X 58 ` : X1000.53',,-` ' FF=.99j49-- " X1012.91 ca X996.58 - ` X1012.95 Q) 1 .95 ` o 99&........ '' , X100305 # 2 �0.. # 5 X 1005.58 o NO TE: 6. # THIS PLAN SHOWS THE PROPOSED FINAL HOUSE GRADING FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS. .995.71 X ttt �o FF 1014 61 _ = X101314 i X 1003.10 # X 100 1. 15 .-.. .....,... � Existing House rN 66 5' MIN. LENGTH POST \ 1$ 65 1©�'2 AT 4' MAX. SPACING X1001.15 \I - XI I 1 4 16 0 X GEOTE TLE FABRIC FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. TAMPED -•. ? '.. ,' -'- ( � � BACKFILL WITH X 005 09 / o NATURAL SOIL 1 RUNOFF N UR \ X1005-35 O. \ / . z 62 1`" l i 006, 71 XUj 9 00 N .9 , .......64., ,. 05 02 - , 0 , �6 1000.82X a,,..... 0 !%� �X 993:38 31" d'30s -'- 22 0, ` _..... 1oo31oX ��,.o.,1F / SILT FENCE DETAIL Pond Stoirn H o %20 0-32 ... s�-...��8 ..... OLX.. �.,�-� 2� y9 -SF-SF --SF - DENOTES SILT FENCE 4 � " b J Rrm�97 78 �9?.... 25�4' 4 --99 72 .. In v= 97223 �.: \. `. _..988..... .. 0 -- 90 ...C3 100 .......... 33 X961. 18 -` ` . `. .........:. X962.96 3T ` : � 9,>8..... ....... .,..-9�6....... _ .,.... ....._ .. ... 976....... "iti --� 98� 1 ' 98E. 44"" 974.,,.... storm MH ' ST /� 3l' 988--- 0 40 .... Rim = 9 74.62 \ `-..... 9 __ _ - -� . N.. In v= 96F. 97 -... ��l it l..... . 1 9c'> C W. ihv=9959.5) �_ 9�6 ST 11,39... �`.......... a 4 �:l.o ..... E. Inv .,59.42 _..5 �G......., g 968... X96 a''g.... ._NNW . 964.87X _...... ......... ........ 966 T " X963.45 96� REV- NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION DESIGNED DRAWN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR www.ottoassociates.com REDSTONE RPROJECTNO: UNDER RE DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I T A DULY SECONDARY GRADING PLAN P.E.O. T.J.B. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 9 West Street THE STATE OF MINNESOTA/"� St� TTO CHRIS MAY CHECKED C Buffalo, MN 55313 14-0135 (763)682-4727 P•E.0. Poul E. Otto SSOCIATES Fax (763)682-3522 DATE: DATE: 2-13-15 LICENSE NO. 40062 Engineers &Land Surveyors, Inc. CHAN HASSEN, M N SHEET NO. 2 OF 4 SHEETS 1 2-12-15 -t 11t ejti� d2 ji 1 ---BLUFF L .INF —CANOPYLINE 0 0 22,30 0 �7 020 032 MWMNWOO PWId St MH 029 $10 25 0 0, JI) Rkr 06,979.78 028 Mve 972.53 0 jj J4 00 35 sr 036 38 I Stam MH 037 Rkn-974.62 N. Ino -M97--1 41 W In X959.50 0 39 ............ ........... 49 E. Inio-959.42 . . . . . . . . . . IPTION DESIGNED DRAWN I "My COUFT 1W TM KAN WAS PREMW Uf LWM W On= SUPERMM AND 7 M1 I AM A DULY P.E.O. T.J.8. RE81S'1ERED PROFUN-ml ENOMM W= THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF META. CHECKED 'ilzae P.E.O. pow Otto A6-13-18 www. otbassociates-com 9 West Division Street TTOBuffalo, MN 55313 (763,W2.4727 $80CIAM Fax- (763)W-3522 ad surveym, Inc REDSTONE RIDGE CHRIS MAY CHANHASSEN,MN Tree Inventory propared by. Heritage Shod* Tree Consultants Manuel Aa++aOon, ISA Cortiflod Arborfet kOW 0206 A P.a BOX 26607 St. Loulm Park MN 55426 76J�-717-9W Tree DSH Is the tree's dkmoter measured at 4.5 Mot ftm the ground Tree CondlOws am deffited as: 0— Good Condition. A hedthy and structurally sound tree. F — Fab* Condition. A bvo lockbg In health and/or structurally deftW4 but cwmtabl& P — Poor Condition. A bw with si"Iftant health or structural dethc* and difikult to correct the problwn& D — Dead or Dying. No chance to correct health or structural concerns. Notes: 1. Some tmw numbers are not sequential due to them being orIgbally toned but are within the bluff. PROXCT AREA = 174 ACRES EVSTW0 BASE UNE CANOPY COMMAGE = 1.0 ACRES (3&V MINIMUM CANOPY COMMAGE REQUIREDw a7 ACRES (25X) EVS77NO CANOPY COMMAGE PRESMVWm ag ACRES (JJV NEW WE COVERAGE REQUIRED w 0 aw 0 ACRES NEW TREES REQUIRED m I FRONT YARD TREE PER LOT AT &NMNO PERMIT TIME PROJECT NO: TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 14-0135 A rF SHEET NO. 4 OF 4 SHEETS 1 12-15 Kill, K- m "T;c WIE,T11i M, =A-77,71 Nil F"m LAW W:i7i 7�77 � Al� W 7 � .��L� 7,7 7-N7 Tree Inventory propared by. Heritage Shod* Tree Consultants Manuel Aa++aOon, ISA Cortiflod Arborfet kOW 0206 A P.a BOX 26607 St. Loulm Park MN 55426 76J�-717-9W Tree DSH Is the tree's dkmoter measured at 4.5 Mot ftm the ground Tree CondlOws am deffited as: 0— Good Condition. A hedthy and structurally sound tree. F — Fab* Condition. A bvo lockbg In health and/or structurally deftW4 but cwmtabl& P — Poor Condition. A bw with si"Iftant health or structural dethc* and difikult to correct the problwn& D — Dead or Dying. No chance to correct health or structural concerns. Notes: 1. Some tmw numbers are not sequential due to them being orIgbally toned but are within the bluff. PROXCT AREA = 174 ACRES EVSTW0 BASE UNE CANOPY COMMAGE = 1.0 ACRES (3&V MINIMUM CANOPY COMMAGE REQUIREDw a7 ACRES (25X) EVS77NO CANOPY COMMAGE PRESMVWm ag ACRES (JJV NEW WE COVERAGE REQUIRED w 0 aw 0 ACRES NEW TREES REQUIRED m I FRONT YARD TREE PER LOT AT &NMNO PERMIT TIME PROJECT NO: TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 14-0135 A rF SHEET NO. 4 OF 4 SHEETS 1 12-15 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on March 26, 2015, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for the Redstone Ridge — Planning Case 2015-08 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. '- Kare J. Engel ardt5 Deputy Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me thisday of �'�� rf I'1 , 2015. a . ......... it A4,k -/ -1 -t Notary Pu M.T. MFUWISSF-14 KI Pubit-Winnesota � NOi�� E ,� 31, 2020�Wty �,�ission '°�''..;:... v 0 OA" L Z 0 V 0 z O E E 0 V s s 4— -i--, LO X cn co L N 0 +r () L U) �'' .> O 4-� O Q L O `O ,_� co U) , O -D L a) ^ rn Q VO O O im 0 0 a E N C .cn COIii ` � O -0 U O •+-' U .0 Ui (� cam. COL �, � o N C N u) E c E L E c ci OU o >, L U _� '- a) • Q) • p f+in N a) O ♦,,, n�.c O O V • V% �O L O __ � � .2 �, L O .N '�, .= C 2.2 to t_n C F- to (a _> C +_C U co 0) cu O L— 0 ° .L Q Q) >' O Ca •-' .� L- Q O •� O co O >1 •O O Ui �- O O O C C Y_ co 3 a) DEQ o -a �m�o �.c-0 L O 0.c m C Cp N > m N di -a O (/� O L (/� U V V_i -c C +� c: Ea> L O >% � O (� U; U N mU �: co O.v O +. -0 ". cn U "- C >+ C �• Q cc c Q° U �� Qo o o c O O L— 4) CU -�-+ 4— a) O v , O O O a) .- E `�- to N +-' p U 4-+ O O D U � to a) -0 .c •L E o F' c a c m cU io , m c 3 E L ° c- >. c- m N S :c a) Vi •� p _ ,�_ O �� 4— �'' �- O ''-' O L O O CI3 O >, +-• O a) C L U �� c 0 a) U) 0 *`� s (n L) E a> c 0 Jc (U E L .r ._ U ••- � cn o � 3 O.0 .,.� I- L f a G1 O N) O ,,.., C Cl +r 0) -4--' Q (� .� .� �� O `� O C = `_' '-' ° � (D ~ E a> o L e o m a> � a> 0 O ca ° L a) E o c o a) 0)a)oo • E O•— p � ,�' L O .� +�—, o a) O ° � L'•- �°o -2 Q p O (� E co 0a) -0 .0 •� `� E '� O �j (a a) � ,O � �"' ci. o c a> � 0 C- m "D c n 70 _Lo 0i c° can Q O O � > N O° Q p m a) '+- (6 N a) O Q O O O•- 4- m E ° t 3 -v a> o o U -a a c 0 `.° o -ov o O L � N N a) O 4- ,O O Z3 -U j> U) a) O to N .�..- +� U to U C p O N O O C t O c fn t C •� — >, .� L �= o a> m� c W C)L � o m m��_ -D E .— a) L O O1 V �.r O .� (� a) O -1--� � Q) (nCY) o Q C C .� D CD O a> U cn a) .� O U m O �-� O (� y� •- a) W L (6� J= � p U U QC __ O ca Q C L L (n O a) Q•- O O L a) U p U Q C co•U C •- E O c N o Q N cn o U�a> MO0m°cQ0a>U� c m o ._ E Q O •- o m >. - N U ,> C O +� p •tn to �..� U) .�... O a--' O }. O to - O (a �- U _> (Cf C•� Q a> �; L �, �. 16 E �, .. � � U L) to Q o aa) o -0 ami � m a> - ti n •�,�_-C U N _� >+ � �.-+ O O N }+ O U -r O C (D C `'�' � a) ♦-' > (� to s" �-% O C"' -O O Q� +� �+-- O to � (� �' �'� O ` (U a) .U) O a) c .a? c a> _- E �. L L c m c -c o a�o-Q c' a�Eca��»�..c c � E � � � � E � a> c a> a> � W � � a> QC N O �/� v/ O L �•-•- CL O m ,U }..ca O 0 C O O L Q, _ Q a) -r. O O O >� > 4— U� _ (6 C6 Jc 0 O NCa) E00UOE° mOc C0 cn 0 UOc a E w' c-0 L a> m 0= Q o .Q Q> U C) O Z 4- O O O d- C U Q p p (u O E U L �, (� (Cf 4., - L C U -c (o '�' -0 O C C p U N c !2 E Q. 3 L-0 a> Q o o .U) m m o cca �_. .. v> � U - Q >. C - o Q a> a> a> a> - m a? a> -a m a> L s E (6 L = c a O (� cfl O pZf .� a) = .� a) E O +� p a) (6 °_ a) _ o a)— M +' S �p ca 4., O O U C cn -� �, U E � Y L c — E Q > Q c O '2 Q cn m- a> _- .L ccc U o o- o E c co cv o� a> In ._ c U) = C O � QCi to •- v U }' U — .— (� F-' U .�._. .Q r- L U O C Q O 1 4- �' a) ., .— .0 .0 +_� o�� m0...c2c co c: �aa)o E o c c.0 m v> ._ .� - ._ co c o a L c m � �- �U� �.., to a) W OAU L .� .44. O M - OQ a) O .a � � I- O (U ��NM� O a) Q a) >, a) a) O >� N a) `}'� v)N� E to C C _ U ,� O -+-, O Q �, a> .E Q- o .� m ° -� -� �-� c E E N E �- o w c '3 � c: cx. o -gym - ;E N M .0 � 4O .V? ♦., }' a�t��a° `�o°���n C O Q c c O cQ.c X jLL a) O E 3 c •• (a a) C -c OdaQQa)CQ E o 0 0�� c a> o -- Qo O c t 0CU=�m3a .. Q% _ .= O ov>°o M C O Q j (D -0 � �-0 U Y0-0 C U- �' � o��Ucn � � 2� ~ ■ ■ ' ' . . .�.+ .. Q d% Vi a..r O U) N L U C C O.�a d o°'-�'� � QL Q d m o v a> >, >, ° c co w L- O t/1 0 m O O Co a>. .�mU�°ossa B ♦r 0 CL 2 Q) ,*.r ga `•■ E cn �■ co °� .> (D� L W E0 Cl) O o In Co cn c U O O J Q O O s-� o �= CU -W"�) 'L) .- �o��°U) wE5=(,,�O aQmLO ���c�QE =CL F -0-Z C MG. 4— � c- 0a Oc� ._ : cu X cn L CCL L- L -0 (D -0 o ca " O > O � , o Q O C � C -O 0' cO oc c=c c m cc �E E �-0 °C coo =3O O . fn u- .Q — -�-' U U a) U C (� O p U) O Q N CO a> E 3 m Q t E � Q L v a >, a) V � A/ O O= •O ?, O •p C C p _O Q) O C O •� Q E Al > -�-+ O L -_- C nt (� �V w o ai o o a> -- cn c a> -v -0 �� sc>u>Lcn a�-c LO c •tn .0 H to ; CD C m a) co C_ CD CU'� �� L O C L U C u) L Q V/ — co .p L QL oE>` co: ° LL -v 3 E m(> c a> c'a .L C N m ,(� N E '''' U O L w L }, C E O O O a) Rj U a) a) ca amUm COo'L) o•>,co ¢0) c °>Eaci==O°>c°c a) s ca -� N 4— a) O V ;, 0 Oco a) ,, �/? • (� C O 0 0 E O +� p U +.. a) U C U O M C `0. U) L� a) a c c E m H .a c U -v c 3 c-° c O a> o a> .� (D -E.-a> 3 °' a� G) a) N O a) +-� O ♦'' L C �• O C +r E ,C a) 4- +-� �, � C L N 3. a> O L .� ' >, Co a> CO 3 a> O a> a> cn 1- o ,- E c o H- • o (CS � v� �' = C cn ap U O C +� � L pF— E O� �"' m° a> a0i a> ��� �3QU-oE-0L_Q�> � � U �, E O•— p � ,�' L O •�' � � 0) a) v, � a) �- C= �� C .c... C 4) •� co a) � ♦' O C �� L to — O N � a) }' a) a- 0 Q � �� � L) (1) a) cocLo c�.`nQc=s�, E mco >� ` o 'o (1)-, m .° c c Q O O Imo- Rf LL C> C 4— O E p 'O (ii O O Q- O O lfj (iS .O `� � _O - a) a) a) cn C c ° LD c o E�� ��Q° �> a> = ° �' O C uj ;�-� N N C N S a) p ?� 4--' 4L- (� �, C p O -O ° cu -c O N +-' U .- t� ♦' O C -C O m L -0 w. O ai o c o U N c o a m_ a> E> >, m a> �= Q o ,� O L O O C N s` .,... U O 0 0 a) o +.+ C c U C p o a) a) ca .'"� � C C O ` (� � a) _.°w ..mom= -L �Ec °a>c- i6 o o m flU � E a o m mm o Q c c a> c o a> U cn O c LO :5 � E _ (� a) L _ >_ � C }' a) • L > Q O _O (� ..,r � •� � a) >' '> cu L U c O a) U O Q .>_ m � m ._�_' cn � c � ccn � o c a) Q m° O "- a) cn i >O ca '"' ° r i p OL (a - .O Z3 .y O W J.c C C p U U � (13 Q O =_ a) C L p O L N a) �•U p U � C _ M C = U C o` -O _ 3cpcNa> L) LODUc vim' �mo2XE Q.0 (D>'2 'u> N ~ V •� C O N �.+ p �-• O to }. .c/) ♦.; O O O +r a) �- 0 L U O t_n _ co a) U=> O Q ♦-. ` to C ca a) vi cn c m a> E �' �-' -- U U �4 v>ac o aci� �=v m viN�--- c .ai c a> E° L L c m .E ° —_ C •`' U C 3 >+ O ~ •N 4- O C (�S _C • > (a ' L, ° •O () v) }, (� = O to -0 (u C p `a .� — a) _ N a> m o c r E -ma m > rn W c`a o c E � -� E c �' o "� a) Q 'C Q O L O W 0Z Q O C7).— a) O .0 C6 U a) L L C C N O �'C = Q O a) p (6 >, j t6 +r C-0 to 4- O- .- (/� O t' (� — O E o a� .o m c a> L �. .) c, o E " c �o L E -v Y o 0 0= Q o Ec_�E > U O 4_ O p d• cn a) O tCS O U +.. }, O co �' -C C U (a O C a) C U= (6 •� c°m v>c�Lc a)Q o o 0 m° m Q>,� - o 0- a) m co 0-0 >+ N= cu +-• (6 •+-� � � F'- m c CO C O L a) ca L C =am, = ` i'Iz O to U O_ p • � . _ C M �'' � to }, E a) � O U v� -0 ami L) E m m E a> Q o E uS ° "- Q E Q E �' m � >, O v a> E c 4 U o c - = O C � 7-3 ° 0 � G •- v Q U .;.J U -c p � a) _ F- U OL U O � C 0 C- N 1 4— •+-.' a) _. C E' U• C +a cn � ,� v> o -a � m o -o .o c ai .X c aci � ami o C cn C L O C -_ cn c 0 0co E o c �> c> .0 m a) =3 U a) +.r W O L L U co- (0 C E- co m Q O a) Q a) >' a) p >+ N a) O� `~ � to N -c E C C (� U +r O O 0" .c Q c- Q a> aoi c- n C OL E N L 0Q�° E N 0 �Q N M .0 L •� � a) P> a) u 0) Q) m o c c Q o a) 0 -a E� cn - ox •�s .. y •� (Q O C: W c�ocoE-a>oE3c �ELmo..�-�ca, o -Qoocc .. _ S ^ ._ .0 O E ^, O ��QQa>�Q�°o-�o3�iUoc G a> c E a•o 0-00- c 75 -0 0 o� �m� _ _ 0 -- q: O L O ° co Q� O "' • F- O !� ■ ■ _ i.i. 0 = u) W L O O.ch ` L ,.,.., L _ C m a o 1S L C U) L c ._ .. m� o a> O U oa'>Lca>m�c>'`'m ''-aocEm- •- t/1 O •- _ �' •- E _ O' }, .O a caciv>�c`v�3ca��`->� sw� 3 .0 2 Q m m .Q O .. ♦r O Q O V 4) C `• m -- U o a> a> _ CO E•E •- c U.m m m O O J Q O G.J �+ '� ,+,.r S to O CJU O W p�' �� a> E a> m cn U o .S u) m> - Q 3 c° c� Q Q E m a> I -0-Z C MG.CL ALEJANDRO FERRER-MACHUCA ANDREW E & KARI L WEILEDER ANDREW G SEIFERT 6330 TETON LN PO BOX 221 1320 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 CHASKA, MN 55318-0221 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 BRENT W & DIANE E FESTER 6350 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 BRUCE A & ANNETTE M KOTZIAN 1340 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 CHRISTIAN S & MAUREEN CONNERY 6440 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHRISTOPHER WALTER MAY 6400 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 DANIEL J & PAMELA J FELLER 6430 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 ELIZABETH RENEE HILLS O'CONNOR 6431 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 GERALD E STORY 6281 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8331 GREGORY S & PATRICIA J BAZANY 6420 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 BRETT K STIER 2211 HILLSBOROUGH RD APT 4108 DURHAM, NC 27705-4164 CARY LYNN & JOYCELN R HUGHES 6480 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHRISTOPHER G GIMSE 6381 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 CINDY JO GREEN 6371 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 DANIEL J & SANDRA A COLICH 1321 ASHTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7529 GARY A & KAREN J DOHSE 6251 TETON LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9054 GREGORY A TINBERG 6491 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 JAMES A S HAN ESY 6340 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 BRIAN D & DIANE S WYFFELS 6421 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8332 CHET T MASTELLER 1311 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 CHRISTOPHER M HUBBY 6380 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 COLIN & LAURA J MCCULLOUGH 6470 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 DAVID W & JULIE A PEDERSON 6511 DEVONSHIRE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7541 GARY P & LEORA F MATTILA 1321 ITHILIEN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9032 GREGORY F AAMODT 6391 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 JAMES J JOHNSON 6421 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 JAMES R & CAROLYN K HESKETH JASON HARDIE JEFFREY R & PAULETTE L DANIEL 6500 DEVONSHIRE DR 1331 ASHTON CT 1321 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7537 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7529 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 JERRY K & VALORIE A HARLOW JIMMY D SHADLER JOHN J SAVARINATHAN 6490 DEVONSHIRE DR 6450 BRETTON WAY 6360 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7539 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 JOHN W JR & SUSAN E KUNITZ 6441 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 KENNETH F & PATRICIA J GARVIN 6390 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 MARC E MEEDEN 6481 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 MICHAEL J & ELIZABETH BRANDES 6411 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8332 MONICA A W IANT 1385 ITHILIEN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9032 RHONDA C DOWNIE 6361 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 SAMULE D TEUT 1311 ITHILIEN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9032 STEVEN R & SANDRA K KVIDERA 6510 DEVONSHIRE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7537 JONATHAN L SCHARLAU 1291 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 LEONARD E & ANN B WARE 1225 LILAC LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9053 MARCUS R & JENNIFER A ZBINDEN 6460 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 MICHAEL R MENZEL 6490 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 NAOMI RUTH CARLSON 5955 CAT H CA RT DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8916 ROBERT L RABE 6307 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 SHARON MICHELLE O'BRIEN 6451 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 SUZANNE B BLUESTEIN 6501 DEVONSHIRE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7541 KATHRYN P BROUGHTON 1301 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 MALCOLM K & MITRA P WHITLOCK 6471 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 MATTHEW A MCGEE 6398 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 MICHELLE M MERGEN 1280 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 PETER B & LEAH J THORSON 6370 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 RONALD C HAGLIND 6470 DEVONSHIRE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7539 STEVEN B & ALLISON M WEICK 6401 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8332 THOMAS & MOLLY BERGFALK 6461 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 THOMAS A PATTON THOMAS MAY TODD R & DIANE E GERHARDT 1310 STRATTON CT 6341 TETON LN 1330 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509