PC Staff Report 7-19-05
PC DATE:
July 19, 2005
1
CC DATE:
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
REVIEW DEADLINE:
8/9/05
CASE #:
05-18
BY:
JM, JS, DR
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSAL:
Request for 4.23% hard surface coverage variance from the maximum 25% hard surface
coverage restriction for the addition of a patio and retaining wall on property located in the
th
Single Family Residential District at 380 West 86 Street. The sidewalks and patio have
been built.
nd
LOCATION:
Lot 4, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor 2 Addition
th
380 West 86 Street
Chanhassen, MN 55317
APPLICANT:
Troy & Virginia Kakacek
th
380 West 86 Street
Chanhassen, MN 55317
PRESENT ZONING:
Single Family Residential (RSF)
2020 LAND USE PLAN:
Residential – Low Density (Net Density Range 1.2 – 4u/Acre)
ACREAGE:
0.35 acre
DENSITY:
N/A
SITE DATA
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a 4.23% hard surface coverage variance from
the maximum 25% hard surface coverage restriction for the addition of a patio and retaining wall. These
improvements have already been built.Staff is recommending denial of this request.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed
project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high
level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established
standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
S Lake Riley dvlB snialP taerG 101 ywH Lakeview Road E dvlB yeliR ekaL Quinn Road Lyman Blvd (C.R. 18))81 .R.C( dvlB namyL Greenleaf evirD dleifgnirp
Planning Case #05-18
Kakacek Variance
July 19, 2005
Page 2
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
th
The subject property is located southeast of Great Plains Boulevard on West 86 Street and is zoned
Single Family Residential (RSF). The applicant is requesting a 4.23% (which represents 642.24 square
feet of site coverage) hard surface coverage variance from the maximum 25% hard surface coverage
restriction for the addition of a patio and retaining wall. These structures have already been built bringing
the existing hard surface coverage to 29.23%.
Lake Susan
M
i
s
s
i
o
n
H
i
l
l
Rice Marsh Lake
s
e
L
l
a
c
n
r
i
e
C
d
s
v
l
l
l
i
B
H
n
s
o
n
i
i
M
s
a
s
l
a
P
i
M
y
t
f
a Hills
Mission
i
e
e
Crt
l
r
d
G
C
r
t
1
M
0
Tigua Lane
1
i
H
i s
l
W 86th St nl
y
s
s
o
w
D
i
i
sr
o
.
H
s
i
n
M
M
i H
s
s
i
o
n
i
H
i l
l
l
l
Fr
i s
s
s
L
c
D
a
o
r
n
.
C
e
r
t
W 86th St
t
r
C
e
ic
R
M
i
Marshland Trl
s
Subject Site
s
i
E
o
n
l
l
W
i
H
a
B
y
y
H
l
i
la
l
Monk Crt
W
W
a
Mi
ssion
c
H
k
b
e
i
r
a
d
C
r
r
t
t
l
a
n
Proposed T.H.212
d
C
rt
a
B
y
h
t
r
o
D
N
r
APPLICABLE REGUATIONS
Sec. 20-91. Zoning compliance review.
(a) Zoning compliance review shall be required for the construction of structures which do not require
building permits to determine compliance with zoning requirements such as setback, site coverage,
structure height, etc.
(b) Any zoning compliance review application that fails to meet zoning ordinance requirements shall
be denied by the community development director.
Sec. 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks.
25 percent
(5) The maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces is .
Planning Case #05-18
Kakacek Variance
July 19, 2005
Page 3
Impervious surface
means any material that substantially reduces or prevents the infiltration of storm
gravel
water. It shall include, but not be limited to, driveways, parking area, buildings and structures.
(20)
BACKGROUND
nd
The subject property was platted as part of Rice Lake Manor 2 Addition which was recorded on October
22, 2003. The house was built in 2004. The patio, retaining wall and sidewalks were not shown on the
plans for the building permit application. The subject property is located in the Single Family Residential
(RSF) district and has an area of 15,180 square feet. In the RSF district 25% is the maximum permitted
impervious surface coverage for a lot. The applicant currently has a hard cover of 29.23%.
The hard cover issue came to the attention of the City in mid-November when the as-built survey from
Otto Associates was submitted. It appeared the lot could be over on the maximum hard cover
percentage. The City requested that hard cover calculation details be shown on the as-built survey. The
City received the revised survey on December 2, 2004 showing the existing hard cover was 31.8%.
Shortly after, staff informed the applicant they must bring the lot into compliance with hard cover
restrictions or apply for a variance.
This application was originally scheduled to appear before the Planning Commission on June 7, 2005.
The original proposal included the concrete and gravel sidewalks as part of the variance request. This
put the hard cover request at 30.86%. The applicant requested the application be tabled in order to
revise the variance proposal. The Kakacek’s have since removed the concrete and gravel sidewalks and
have replaced them with landscaping rock and mulch. In doing so the applicant has reduced the existing
hardcover by 248 square feet, or 1.63%. Therefore, a correction to the survey hard cover calculations
needs to be made. The as-built survey includes the sidewalks as part of the hard cover calculation. The
City does not consider landscape rock and mulch, with a fabric liner, to be impervious surface.
Therefore, the sidewalk portion of the hard cover calculations shall be ignored for the purposes of this
variance request.
Before - Gravel Walkway After – Mulch Walkway
Planning Case #05-18
Kakacek Variance
July 19, 2005
Page 4
Before - Concrete Sidewalk After – Rock Walkway
Revised as-built survey calculation:
House = 2,537.24 sq. ft.
Patio = 519.00 sq. ft.
Driveway = 1,369.00 sq. ft.
Retaining Wall= 12.00 sq. ft.
TOTAL4,437.24 sq. ft. 29.23%
=
In discussing the matter, the applicant informed staff that miscommunication had contributed to the
violation of impervious surface restrictions. According to the applicant, the plans which the City
approved were different from those the homeowner had in their possession. The applicant did meet with
staff, prior to construction of the home, to discuss landscaping options for the property. Staff informed
the applicant that any part of the property could be landscaped except in easements. In a meeting
between staff and the applicant, which took place after the issue of impervious surface came to the
attention of the City, it was revealed that the applicants’ interpretation of landscaping included patio
areas. Had staff been aware of this interpretation, the applicant would have been informed that hard
cover restrictions include concrete and paver patios.
Adding to the discrepancies between the proposed building survey and the as-built survey are the
dimensions of the driveway. The driveway was built larger and with a different shape than that which
was proposed. The as-built survey shows that the home and driveway alone are at 25.8% (111.24 square
feet over the maximum permitted hard cover).
ANALYSIS
The site is zoned Residential Single Family (RSF). The applicant has completed construction of the
sidewalks and patio in question. Chanhassen City Code does not require building permits for sidewalks
and patios. However, such structures do require a zoning compliance review. The City uses zoning
compliance reviews to ensure that structures, which do not require a building permit, still comply with
zoning ordinances. Criteria of a zoning compliance review include setbacks, hard surface coverage and
structure height.
Kakacek Variance
Planning Case #05-18
July 19, 2005
Page 5
Patio Retaining Wall/Rock Sidewalk
There are alternatives the applicant could pursue to bring the property into compliance with City Code.
Regarding the patio, the applicant could remove the patio pavers and replace them with wooden decking
with a pervious surface below. This would allow the applicant to continue to enjoy their backyard while
complying with ordinance requirements. In addition, in order to reach 25%, the size of the driveway
would have to be reduced by at least 111.24 square feet.
While the applicant has expended money for the improvements, such expenditure does not justify the
granting of a variance. Approval of a variance is contingent upon proof that the literal enforcement of
the Chanhassen City Code would cause an undue hardship. Not having a reasonable use of the property
would constitute an undue hardship. Reasonable use is defined as the use made by a majority of
comparable property within 500 feet. Reasonable use of this property, a single-family home with a two-
car garage, already exists. Any use of the property beyond that discussed above is strictly ancillary to
the principal use. There are alternatives the property owner could pursue to receive the same utility, i.e.,
use of deck instead of patio. Based on these facts, staff must recommend denial of this request.
Landscaping
nd
The landscaping requirements for Rice Lake Manor 2 Addition included a total of 12 trees to be
planted as part of subdivision approval. Each lot was required to have two trees of the aforementioned
th
trees planted in the front yard. Lot 4, Block 1, 380 West 86 Street is required to have a total of four
trees planted as part of the subdivision conditions of approval. A recent inspection of the property found
only one tree, a crabapple, planted in the front yard. Two existing trees remain in the rear yard. This lot
requires three more trees to be planted in order to meet subdivision requirements.
Kakacek Variance
Planning Case #05-18
July 19, 2005
Page 6
FINDINGS
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a
variance unless they find the following facts:
a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means
that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or
topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500
feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize
that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-
existing standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria.
Finding:
The literal enforcement of this chapter does not cause an undue hardship. By having a
single-family home and a two-car garage the property owner has reasonable use of the property.
There are also reasonable alternatives to the patio.
b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other
property within the same zoning classification.
Finding:
The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties that lie
within the Single Family Residential District.
c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of
the parcel of land.
Finding:
The improvements increase the value of the property.
d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship.
Finding:
Construction of the patio and retaining wall were completed before a zoning compliance
review was performed; therefore, this is a self-created hardship.
e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land
or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
Finding:
The granting of a variance may be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located due to the increase in
runoff from this property.
f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or
substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger
the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
Finding:
The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets.
Kakacek Variance
Planning Case #05-18
July 19, 2005
Page 7
RECOMMENDATION
Staffrecommends that the Planning Commissionadopt the following motion:
“The Planning Commission denies Variance #05-18 for a 4.23% hard surface coverage variance from the
maximum 25% hard surface coverage restriction for the addition of a patio and retaining wall on a lot zoned
Single Family Residential (RSF) based upon the findings in the staff report and the following:
1.The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship.
2.The property owner has reasonable use of the property.
The Planning Commission orders the property owner to:
1.Remove sufficient impervious surface to comply with ordinance requirements.
2.Plant three trees to meet subdivision requirements.”
Should the Planning Commission choose to approve the variance, staff recommends that the Planning
Commission adopt the following motion:
“The Planning Commission approves Variance #05-18 for a 4.23% hard surface coverage variance
from the maximum 25% hard surface coverage restriction for the addition of a patio and retaining wall
on a lot zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) with the following conditions:
1.The applicant must plant three trees to meet subdivision requirements.”
ATTACHMENTS
1.Findings of Fact.
2.Development Review Application.
3.Letter from Troy & Virginia Kakacek stamped “Received May 6, 2005”.
4.Letter from Kurt & Lynne Miller dated May 4, 2005.
5.Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing List.
6.Building Permit Survey.
7.As-Built Survey.
g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-18 kakacek variance\staff report.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND ACTION
INRE:
Application of Troy & Virginia Kakacek for 4.23% hard surface coverage variance
from the maximum 25% hard surface coverage restriction for the addition of a patio and
retaining wall - Planning Case No. 05-18.
On July 19,2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled
meeting to consider the Application of Troy & Virginia Kakacek for a 4.23% hard surface
coverage variance from the maximum 25% hard surface coverage restriction for the addition of a
patio and retaining wall on property located in the Single Family Residential District at 380 West
86th Street. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance that
was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from
all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential (RSF).
2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential - Low Density (Net
Density Range 1.2 - 4uJ Acre).
3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 4, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor 2nd
Addition
4. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall
not grant a variance unless they find the following facts:
a. Literal enforcement of this chapter would not cause undue hardship.
b. The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable, generally, to other
properties in the Single Family Residential district.
c. The improvements increase the value of the property.
d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is a self-created hardship.
e. The granting of the variance may be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is
located.
f. The proposed vanatlOn will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or
increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or
impair property values within the neighborhood.
5. The planning report #05-18 Variance dated July 19,2005, prepared by Josh Metzer, et
aI, is incorporated herein.
ACTION
The Chanhassen Planning Commission denies the variance from the impervious surface
restriction for the addition of a patio and retaining wall.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on this 19th day of July, 2005.
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
BY:
Planning Commission Chairperson
g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-18 kakacek variance\findings of fact.doc
Planning Case No. 0 ~ - I 8
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
REceIVED
MAY 0 6 2005
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PLEASE PRINT
Applicant Name and Address:
'~Oy A-NC> Vll?eiNJII KlfeA-t EK'
3'lo W. ~(p..,*-. S'f,
~t-u\(\ httS'se /1, M tV s- ~ 3 I =t
Contact: V IRe, IN' A ,\ b-. NG€R. "
Phone: 952 -(10....20J~ Fax: g 52 -(1q3- ;:l-I -=t-s
Email: [Lo..lLC"-c v @ fX^-V' \c-n '\ to J1e+. e.on-,
Owner Name and Address:
S <\.m e f\-s <JLjO (~;-'VL./.
Contact:
Phone:
Email:
Fax:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Temporary Sales Permit
Conditional Use Permit
Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements
Interim Use Permit
ex..
Variance
Non-conforming Use Permit
Wetland Alteration Permit.
Planned Unit Development*
Zoning Appeal
Rezoning
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
Notification Sign
Site Plan Review*
X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost**
- $50 CUP/SPRIV ACIVAR/W AP/Metes & Bounds
- $400 Minor SUB
TOTAL FEE $ ~SO.OO
Subdivision*
An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to
the public hearing.
* Twenty-six (26) full-size folded. cppies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8W' X 11" reduced copy for
each plan sheet along with a diqital COpy in TIFF-Group 4 (*.tif) format.
** Escrow will be required for othel' applications through the development contract.
Building material samples must bEli submitted with site plan reviews.
NOTE: When multiple appllcatloml are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
SCANNED
PROJECT NAME:,'1=> A-T \,C) ~:\:)b \, "\ I t)(\)
LOCATION: 3)?O(j.J, c(?lo~-k S+.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
TOTAL ACREAGE:
t 3'1 {X~X t5
WETLANDS PRESENT:
YES
IX... NO
PRESENT ZONING: -R es IDe /'-YT, A C .- SIN G-l F rfl-YY\ I L Y
REQUESTED ZONING: II
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: ~es lDt:f'l'T( He .- S (t0ErLG FA-rY\( L ~
,
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION:
REASON FOR REQUEST: To f(e a '-IF 51 A V A-\'<..l.f\ l\.) e L '",0
l' it T I 0 -Co 'R..e tyU\ l ru (1)0 0 u....~ l+o ME",
l\
t*-cco (;0
F()~..
A-
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable Ci'ly Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the
Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership
(either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person
to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge;
~~t.A.~~ KO-__L.()~~j,L--
~~,
Signature Ol.Applicant
! ~:;~,:.:.. c/!.. ~~.--a_.e.. ~
" '(j,. ~ _J
5/S-/0 5--
sl ~ /0 g;;-
Date
>/S-(os'"
~/G/os;-
Date
G:\plan\forms\Development Review Application. DOC
Rev. 3/05
To the City of Chanhassen - Planning Committee:
Troy and Virginia Kakacek variance request for 380 W. 86th 8t
Points on variance application:
7. Variance request - To allow existing patio to remain as an improvement to the
exterior of the home.
8. a. All homes in the immediate vicinity of our home have preexisting decks
and patios. The back yard (patio area) would not be usable without
covering. The layout of the home requires some walkout consistent with
the homes around us.
b. The homes around us have had preexisting structures but were developed
on much larger lots.
c. The variation is for personal use and to make the area more presentable
and improved.
d. The development was as a result 9f several different miscommunications
despite multiple attempts to pre-empt any future problems prior to
placement. An original building plan was submitted with the patio on it
and the final building approval was changed without our knowledge.
After the house was built we waited to add this later for financial reasons
instead of doing it with the final home construction. We also sought the
advice of the city staff two times prior to starting any landscaping or
hardscaping projects. When we were notified of the problem after our
final survey we were shown what Chanhassen had officially approved and
realized it was different than the plans we had as our final building plan.
e. The variance will improve the neighborhood, it is already in place, and
multiple neighbors have stopped and commented on how they think the
things we have done greatly improved the property.
f. The improvements do not impose any danger, impair property value (an
increase was actually made), and will not infringe upon any neighbors
and! or ordinance. Our neighbors to the north Kurt and Lynn Miller are
substantially below their hardscaping requirements and have included a
letter of support for our variance (see attached).
SCANNED
Kurt D. Miller
8590 Tigua Lane
Chanhassen~ MN 55317
May 4, 2005
To: City ofChanhassen
From: Kurt & Lynne Miller
8590 Tigua Lane
Chanhassen, MN
Subject: 380 West 86th Street
Chanhassen, MN.
Our backyard joins the backyard ofMr. & Mrs. Kakacek. The patio they
had installed last year compliments their backyard and adds to the
functionality of their home.
We do not object to this patio in anyway and believe it is a nice addition to
their home and yard. Our lot is connected along their entire rear property
line is one acre in size and affords an abundance of green space. It would
seem sensible to allow the Kakacek's to retain their patio.
8CANNED
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
Thursday, July 7, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen,
Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing for Kakacek Variance - Planning Case No. 05-18 to the persons named on attached
Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and
depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage
fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate
records.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this'l+l--\ day of:Jukl ,2005.
Y' /Yvl n " ~
~J\..A'\... T'NO~~,.l1A1I'-
f
KIM T. MEUWISSEN I
Notary Public-Minnesota
My Commission ExpIres Jan 31, 2010
8CANNED
0)
c:
.-
...
Q)
Q)
:E
0)5
c: .-
.- tn
I.. tn
ca._
Q) E
:I:E
.~ 0
:co
::so)
c.c:
.-
""'"c:
o c:
Q) ca
(,)-
.- c.
...
o c:
ZQ)
tn
tn
ca
J:
c:
ca
J:
o
0)
c:
.-
...
Q)
Q)
:E
c:
0)0
c: .-
._ tn
I.. tn
ca.-
Q) E
~E
._ 0
-0
.c
::so)
c.c:
.-
""'"c:
o c:
Q) ca
(,)-
.- c.
...
o c:
zm
tn
ca
J:
c:
ca
J:
o
>-
t
Q)
a.
o
....
a.
c
o
~Q)
a5g
ctl
Q) ';::
.l<:: ctl
(ij>u.
. :i: Q) (J)
E OJ a:
,0 ctl
00;-
0....... >,~
0.......0'E
.. (,) Q)
....... (I) Q)"o
- Q5 (,).-
ctl.octl(l)
tOEtQ)
o ctl ::J a:
O..c:(I)
~O"EE
0> ctl ctl
T""" ..c:u.
ctl cb
....-
.8c
ctlCljiiiU5
'OIQ)'O
(I) ::J Q)
Q) O'c'7o
::J ,- Q) 0 to ....
1-0a:NOI-
CD
E
j::c
_v. .!2
.......
! B
Cll 0
0..1
oj
U
:;::
o
I:
III
:E
-
-
o
CIl
'tl
'iij
CIl
III
.l<:: ~
Q) ...
(,) _ CIl
ctl Q).c
'@ Q)-
~ ~ 5
.~ .cOO .!!!
.~ -co go
~E
(1)1:
Q)O
:s:~
OU
00..2
C")<l:
.!
u:
ca >-c
1/1 t: 0
o G):;:;
0. o.Cll
e.!2 eg
D.. D.. <C D.. ..I
'0
>
a5
-
Q)
.l<::
....
ctl
':i:
E;o
o
0.......
0.......
r:....:
CD
E
j::c
-'" ,!2
.......
s B
Cll 0
0..1
.l<::
Q)
(,)
ctl Q) ~
.l<:: Q)_
ctl .... I:
~ - 0
.~~,!!!
.~ -co go
~E
(1)1:
Q)O
:s:~
OU
00..2
C")<l:
.!
u:
ca
1/1
o
0.
o
'-
D..
>c
t:o
G):;:;
o.Cll
e g
<CD....I
Q)"8~
..c:0-
-..c:'O
-....ctl
g.8~
.o..c:_
ctl 0>=
::J'Q) ;!:
o c.:
>-Q)ctl
E:sB
o E Q)
'Eo..c:iI:i
.- '- ...... a..
O:;..,;,S
- ::J c'(I)
.!a a.:;:; 0>
OJ'~ ~.~
.~,~ E ~
ctl'sQ)=
Q).o..c: 0
..c:o_-
.S:! 0 0> ~
:c ; oe +-'
::JC::J..c:
o.ctlO 0>
(1)_ ::J
'- (I) ,0
:SQ)t5~
_::JO)-
o O'.~ 0>
Q)O)ec
(I) .... 0..';::
o_(I)lJ)ctl
e- 'E :.c ~
::Jctl-
o.g '5 g
0) 0.0.0
..c: 0..0 ::J
I-ctlctlo.
Q)"8~
..c:O-
-..c:'O
-....ctl
g.8~
.o..c: _
ctl OJ=
::J'Q) ;!:
o c,:
>-Q)ctl
E..c:..c:
oj....-o
uOEO)
:g1;;e:s~
I: --0)
~ .8 '5 g'iii
_ (I) 0..- 0>
o '~.f: ~.~
CIl.~.~ E ;!:o
~ctl,SO)=
CIl~.g:s.8
III
;u .g 0 C> ~
~ :0 .; .~ -
...::JC::J..c:
o.ctlO 0>
IJ) ::J
,- iii . 0
:SQ)t5~
_::JO)-
o 0"'0 OJ
0) 0).... C
IJ) .... a..;::
o _IJ) IJ) ctl
e- 'E :.c ~
::Jctl-
o.g '5 g
0) 0.0.0
..c: 0..0 ::J
I-ctlctlo.
....:
(,)
Q)
'oop.;
.... (,)
0.0)
'0"0
Q)o..
(I) (,)
00)=
T"""C\iM.,t
:gm
G).5
0.-
0.G)
Cll G)
:I::iE
...G)
Cll.c
.c'"
3:<<i
IJ)
0)
(I)
(I)
....: ::J
(,) (,)
0) IJ)
.0....: '6
.... (,) C
0.0) 0
'0"0 'en
3l 0. ..!a
oO)~E
g-:s -g E
....co.O
0.0Q)0
0) (I)..c: 0)
..c:c-..c:
::::~E';
Oo.oc
;!: 'E ~ ctl
.~ 0) '0 '0
i:: (I) Q) 0)
Q) 0).2: IJ)
> o.O).Q
o=~(,)
c'-.... IJ)
ctl ;!: ~';;'
a>CCCSC
,2: ctl IJ) .~ ....:
OJ ,s:! - Q) (,)
_-c Q)
= 0.0)..c:.
;!: g. E .s:! e
~O)Eo:OO)
_..c: ::J
(J) 1-0 a..:S
C\iM.,t
I/Im
c c
G).-
0.'G)
0.G)
~:iE
...G)
Cll.c
.c-
3:<<i
I
a. ~~E 'i
.8 .00.0 O)E
IJ) ctlC\l::J 'OG)G)
Q) - Q) C") IJ) .-... .c c
(I) 'cT""" 0)>'-
ctlEo'7.8..c:ol/l"':;
0) . 0)....... 0)- .....-....... G)
a.gEC\I~.8~;:~E
-C") 0 C}I 0 >-'5: '-::
OJ.. (l)C\I..c: a.> 0.0 c
.~ "<t 0 to (,) 0:::: -t: G).!2
-0-0> (,)ctl >1/1
Q)-.l<::_::J -0':::'1/1
0) . - ctl 0 0) (J) 0. CD .-
EE,S....>-c G)'E
. O)_O....CD
~ ctl .8 N - 0) OJ= ~ E
- 0 ..c: Q) en ~.~ Cll 0 0
Q)c::?(I):i:::J..c:Q)1ij"":o
o 00 '~ ..c: coO) 8
Q)~::J ~ E;= E~~.5
.o::J~....,c::JO)I-":'iC
IJ)O...... 0)Ci...c: C
c::..c......OCl>-+-' .....ca
ctl -ctlIJ)O)-C:"'-
- 0) . _ ctl ..c: 0 .Q .c D..
0.(,) >-C..c: 0) IJ)- G)
0):;:: ctl 0 c .!a (,) IJ) Cll .c
..c: '0 32 (,) ctl :!: S 'E- G) ...
- ....O)..c: w co
Q) g' u. IJ) ~ $- ~ E :: ...
Q).;::..c: ctl'u c ctl 0 c...
(I) ::J OJ~ Q) 0 0 0
.8 '0 g a. ~ E .~ Q) G) .;:
'Ero~ul8Ec::S:C
ctlI-O)-OQ)OCllCll
;!: >-'0 0) (,) E - = '0
~ctl....ECtIJ)CllI/I
::J .- '0 A.' 0) ctl Q) > ...
o 0 c IJ) = ::::: 0.'0.. Cll ::I
>- >- 0 .- ctl.;:: 0) 0 G) .c
=.o:i::SE;!:'O(,)'o1-
~
I/I~
C C
o G)
:;:;E
m E
::I 0
00
I
a. ~~E 'i
0.00 E
iii ctl C\I -g 0) .
Q) _O)C")(I) 32!G)c
(I) . c:T""" 00)>'-;::;:;
ctlEo'7-..c:OI/l G)
Q) . 0) ....... Q) - .....- ....... ".
- a. E C\I 0 o..c ~ '"
0.0 (I)_="'cE
- C') 0 C}I g >-'S: ... ::
OJ.. IJ)C\I..c: a.> 0.0 c
.~ "<t 0 to (,) 0:::: -t: G) .!2
-0-0> (,)ctl >1/1
Q)-.l<::_::J -0':::'1/1
0) ,- ctl 0 Q)(J) o.CD.-
EE.s....>-5 G)cDE
. Q) - . ... "'-- E
~ ctl .8 N - 0) OJ= ,-;
- 0 ..c: Q) en ~.~ Cll 0 0
O)c::?(I)OO::::::J..c:Q)"'''":o
.... .-..::: 1/1 CD
OOO;!:..c:cOQ) 0
Q)~::J ~ ~= E~~.5
.o::Jo....,c::JQ)I-":'iC
IJ)O>- 0)Ci...c: c
c..c:=t5~a>::::c=.!2
~ 0) .,S ctl ..c: 0 .Q .c D..
0.(,) >-c..c: 0) IJ)'" G)
Q) :;:: ctl 0 c .!a (,) (I) Cll .c
..c: '0 32 (,) ctl :!: S 'E- G) ...
- ....O)..c: w co
0) ~u. IJ) ~ .!!f -6 E:: ...
O).;::..c: ctl'u c ctl 0 C '-
(I) ::J OJ~ 0) 0 0 0
.8 '0 ::J a. ~ E.~ 0) G) .;:
o - E-..c:-
'Ero~t5l8 c_,o
ctlI-O)-OO)O.!2Cll
;!: >-'0 0) (,) E - .- '0
~ctl....ECtIJ)CllI/I
::J .- '0 A.' 0) ctl 0) > ...
o 0 c (I) = ::::: a. '0.. Cll ::I
>- >- 0 .- ctl.;:: 0) 0 G) .c
=.o:i::SE;!:'O(,)'o1-
~
I/I~
C C
o G)
:;:;E
m E
::I 0
00
w w 00 ~ ~
c: J::. . t .S: Q) UJ
g = 5::ca 2;: _'-.~ ~Q) ~~
~ 0 -.;:;0)0. !!!'5 Ceo 1o.l.o cu_
Jg 5 ~ .gJ'~ ctI 0... Q) ~ <( .5 ~ i c ~ C
<wE ~~~ !a ~.E ~Q) !~i
-g.g g E (ij m m ~z. ~* ~ ~.~ +-':J ~
:mQ) .2l.oQ) ~ e 8.~ t:.c: -= ~ a. a.... !! 0 ~ ~~
oQ)oca!.~~_EE - UJ-c:
~~~ ~~aEa....~~~8~ 0; *=~
"'Q)~'(ijQ)-'~ ca Q) Q) "C 0 Q).g Q) 0 t:: i-~ 0_
00~0 ~.~S~~a.5~;~ .5~ ~~e
~~~ ~~sEBE~oo~i ~~ .8~
.~~F ~~~S~'m'5~oO -0 ~~Q)
~_~ ~_~'Q)-~~~"CE~ ~$ e~E
m~0 ~~~~tiQ)Eo-'~ -~ OOO~
~~w E~~-0~Ew~2 000 mQ)e
-owS .E -8.~E-o.5~.sg S;t; .g:5~
~j~ .5.~~B~~~i~~ ~s ~B~
ca w 1ii c>> 'E 1i5 - .!Q E Q) ~ ;: Q) ~ 0 en e t::
c~weQ)Q)~"C.~E~"C~- ~, g&=
ooo-~eE~u="C~Q)~~ wm u~.e
~~8~ic~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~Q)en
C:E~Eo.P",-Q)o~E~~E~ 00.0 "~__
oucQ)- ~c~~ 0 0 ~~ ~ ~
~i~Sca,~~'~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~.~
"'E~~~ES~~8~.2l~u ~~ ~~~
,~<(~~-g8~.Q~"'O~oa:S ~S Ol-oo..
>ID~=~ e~Eew-Eo ~~ '~~!
w"'8~~eOJw:J ~c~o~ ~c m.5=
~oeSi~~~~~~~,~: ~~ ~IDu
~~~~:5~.oQ):5~o~~~~~C>>CQ)~ u~.e
~~~'sco.._IDo~i~-u,5 ~ ~~~
~ ~ ~.5 ~ Q) ~ ~ >..:2 E 8:.9 K m '~"'8 5. ~ ~
~~'5,!Q~:5E~~~~~IDQ)Q)>0 IDa 00
wEg>-g~Q)=(,)o~~~=~~E =~~
C u ~ t:: 8: ."!:;: ~.5 ~ 00 00 ~ '5 "E 0 00 ,Q -
Q)~m~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~ ~~~
KEgi~~~'m~ID~~~e8~'~~~~0
g<(~~F~'.!QgOC"CQ)~:5 ~c~gQ)Q)
I~~*~~~~~g~i~~g~~~:~~~
~~~~~~~8~~~~Q)~~~€~E~~
'2,~~~c~Q)Q)~~'2~E~~Q);:"C~~'-
.. ::) ~ 0 ~ 0!s! E ~ ~ Q) ~ 2 ~ ::.E g-(j} * 0 f?-g
~-g!g ,E'~~~6E~a ,ggjQ)~g~-g
~cm.-~~~uooo~_S~o._oEw-~~
-g ~ c. ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ m - u ien {g ~ ~ ~,g"E 2 c.5
g~E'~'~~~~g~~~mc~wuu'~~~m
~ oe woo"O~~wQ)~Sc~oQ)co..cn
~~Oo,5~t::C~~~~~0~~B~~Q)os
~8~oc~&~gcgg~~.!Q"C~~~:5~
~:~.~gj~~E'i~jga:5;:~~8::~~~
~~~.2~~Q)gQ)EEomm800.~cn:J8m
~ Nc=~oo~~oE c>oo:JQ)Q)Q)m E
gQ)~8:S~Q)Q)uo~,5'~~~c~'~~~
~(I)OC~~IJ)~==~OO~~o.w~~o.m~g
0. . .
~ ID ~o OJ ~
- .c . t .5 ID 00
,Q - 5::cu 2:6 ___~ ~Q) -g~
~ ~ ,-Q)~ ~- C2~ ~ ~B
ID~n :rg'~cu a:~ ~<(,5 ~~ c.cc
~;~ ~o~~ ~s ~.E ~~ !.~i
~~~ E~~ro~~ il& -O'~ -~~
~ mEn 0 Q) t '"E . Q) a. ~ c ~ * _~:;:o=
~ .0 ~ 8 ID g.~ ~ .Q.]! :6 E "E JB 0 w - C
~gB ~=c.E~e~ffl8~ 5; m 'm
~'~~ ~w~~~Q).g~St:: i-~ ~~:5
oo.c 00 c '5= ~ =a o..~ ;:, jg ~ '0 ~ ~ 5 ~
~~nQ) ~_:JE~E~w-m ~~ On
E :c ,~ C = 0 Q) ;: '(j).o >- a 0 -- <5 >. m
'_ffi~g", j:-fij~~~ID{gEg> ~~ c:~E
~ ~~~.ctiQ)Eo-.- -ro wUm
Erom Eoom-o~EID~2 nw mmc
"O~:5 0 ~8.~E-o.5Q)ro CU'- .g:5~
c.-_ ~ooo~~~o~~a: E~ 000
~~o .=io~ocS~wm 0_ ~-ID
cum-~cQ)-.-EQ)_:>m~ uen ct
c~~cIDm.2u,~Em~~- m 5~~
ow-~cEn~~"C~(]Jcu~ mm "wm
~'Eom~ ~cro~~oo-- "000 ~~-
~mg~ID8~~~EU~~.~ ~[ ~Q)oo
~~cQ)~'~!g~~'(j)gE~ ~e G:5c
~~~5~'~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~.~
ooE'~umE.E~~oEm~u -'ffi ~i~
~ <( ~ ~ u O"C (.) >- 0 g .0 a!2 ~ -= 0-0 a..
'~~i~~O~~~~~BE~ ~~ ~~~
m ~ cOm~ ~cwo~ ~c cuc_
oc8eg=~~~~~ID~~: g~ !'~n
~'O~'O~cm!~;:,~~'ffioo .g~ o~S
~c=JB-~.o-o"CCO~W~IDf? ~=c
w::'~~a..~~O~EQ)~~~i~~ 5..~8
__~,-_ID;:O~- a ~Q)Q)0 CQ)
~i'~.!Q~~E~Bg:=~~~~B ~j~
ooEQ)~~<(Q)=mcwcuu_-ro~ mw
"Eu~~~ =~~'2~oow.cUcB ~,2-
Q)~m~~~~c~o~.~,~~~I.c .~a.~
[Eg~~~~~~~~~~eo~,~~.cio
~<(~oo~rr~,!Qgoc~~gS~QQ)c:~g(]Jm
mC (]J:JQ)oE:J C Q _ mo'-.c~
~~~~:~~E8,~:~ijG~5~,~~~
~Q)~~5m~8>.~g~(]J'-~~~QE~c
~~G~C:~Q)Q)6-g~~~~~!~i~.~
..=>c: .~0~~~Q)~:::l21J)~S"'QiwO&rQ)
~i!g .~~o ,:6 ~2 .gg~Q)~~~~
~c(]J._g>~~uooo~_S~O._OEID.-~U
-g ~ a.J~Le ~ ~ ~ m ~ u ioo {g -;:g 5r.8,~ 2 ~,~
g~~E~~~roeg~~~~~~~i~~~~
~~O~Em~~~~~~~~,5uornro(]Joo
~ g u; 0 c <<; 8. ~ ~ -g ,Q 'g ~.<12 ~ .; ~ ~:€ :6 ~-
~:~~~~~~~i~~~~:6~~~8~~~~
~.~c'2~~(]Ji(]JEEO(]J~~oogcu~8~
~E2~~~m~~BE>-2,~~2~:'~~~E
~~~~~w~~~~8B~~~~<m~~~~
0.. . .
Lyman Blvd (C.R 18
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a sUlvey and is not intended to be used as one.
This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and
federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used
to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used
for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or
direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found
please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes ~466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not
be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, Its employees or agents, or third
parties which arise out of the use~s access or use of data provided.
<<NAME1 >>
<<NAME2>>
<<ADD1>>
<<ADD2>>
<<CITY>> <<STATE>> <<ZIP>>
Lyman Blvd (C.R.18
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one.
This map is a compilation of records, information and data iocated in various city, county, state and
federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used
to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used
for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or
direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found
please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes ~466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map aCknowledges that the City shall not
be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third
parties which arise out of the use~s access or use of data provided.
<<Next Record>><<NAME1>>
<<NAME2>>
<<ADD1>>
<<ADD2>>
<<CITY>> <<STATE>> <<ZIP>>
Public Hearing Notification Area Map (500 feet)
Kakacek Variance
Planning Case No. 05-18
380 West 86th Street
City of Chanhassen
Lake Susan
Lake Riley
PATRICIA A ADAMS
429 RICE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
GEORGE J CARLYLE &
JANELLE VEILLEUX CARLYLE
8560 MISSION HILLS LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JOHN D & MARY JO EICHLER
TRUSTEE OF TRUST
25628 CORDOVA LN
RIO VERDE AZ 85263
DANIEL T & KELLY A FASCHING
8550 MISSION HILLS LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
SUNITA GANGOPADHYAY &
SHUBHAGAT GANGOPADHYAY
8571 MISSION HILLS LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JAY K HALVORSON &
ELEN M HALVORSON
422 RICE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
SUSAN M HEINEMANN
421 RICE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
KATHLEEN M JOHANNES
430 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
SARA LUCY KALEY
482 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
KLlNGELHUTZ DEVELOPMENT CO
350 HWY 212 E
PO BOX 89
CHASKA MN 55318
SARAH K BERG
424 MONK CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JAMES A & MARILYN L CRAWFORD
8581 MISSION HILLS LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
MICHELLE J ERICKSON-CODY
442 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
BEVERLY A FIEDLER
8521 TIGUA LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
MICHAEL A GRAY &
SARAH A NICKOLAY
8510 TIGUA LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
ROBERT J & ARLENE T HART
474 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
RICHARD K & THERESA A HESS
8561 MISSION HILLS LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
PAUL D JUAIRE
462 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JEAN M KAMRATH
434 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
KLlNGELHUTZ DEVELOPMENT CO
350 HWY 212 E
PO BOX 89
CHASKA MN 55318
KAREN L BLENKER
405 RICE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
BEVERLEY K DAVIS
466 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
RONALD S & BAR BRA T EWING
8570 MISSION HILLS LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
SCOTT E & SHANNON L FIEDLER
8511 MISSION HILLS LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
ROCHELLE R GREAVES TRUST
570 78TH ST W #2001
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JOSEPH & GAYLE HAUTMAN
TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS
8551 TIGUA LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
BONNIE M HOGHAUG
425 RICE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
TROY A & VIRGINIA L KAKACEK
380 86TH ST W
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
THOMAS D KARELS
416 MONK CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
NIKOLAY V KRASNOKUTSKIY &
LIllY A KRASNOKUTSKIY
8564 POWERS PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
VYACHESLAV KRASNOKUTSKIY &
NATALYA P KRASNOKUTSKIY
4419 CINNAMON RDG CIR
EAGAN MN 55122
PAUL C LYONS
8571 TIGUA LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
NANCY JEAN MESSNER
478 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DAVID T & CORRINE A NAGEL
8550 TIGUA LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
RAYMOND C ORTMAN JR
JULIANNE E ORTMAN
8525 MISSION HILLS LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
BRENTW POPPENHAGEN &
KARl J BERG
8501 TIGUA LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
TIMOTHY T & TRACY A SALWEI
454 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
STEVEN M & TRACY A SCHEID
451 MISSION HILLS CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
TANDEM PROPERTIES
7808 CREEKRIDGE CIR
#310
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55439
ARTURO F URRUTIA
408 MONK CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
KEVIN KUNZE
417 RICE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JOYCE I MANCINO
413 RICE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
KURT D & LYNNE MILLER
8590 TIGUA LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
LARRY M & MARLENE R NASH
409 RICE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
ERIC L PETERSON
KATHERINE M WELCH
8561 TIGUA LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JENNIFER RENKL Y
446 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
GORDON A & BRENDA M
SCHAEFFER
8591 TIGUA LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JAMES M SCOTT
PO BOX 544
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
RACHELLE L TIMLIN
404 MONK CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
AMANDA C WINBLAD-VONWAL TER
438 MISSION HILLS WAY E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JUDITH A LEHMAN
412 MONK CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
LUANN M MARKGRAF
401 RICE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JULIE S MONROE
418 RICE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DAVID & SHARON NICKOLAY
8500 TIGUA LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
MARK D PILATE
470 MISSION HILLS WAY E
#115
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
BRIAN M & DAWN M RODELL RILEY
8580 MISSION HILLS LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CARMEN M SCHALLOW
428 MONK CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
LAWRENCE D & NANCY E STEIN
8541 MISSION HILLS LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
SHANNA M UNKE
420 MONK CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
BARBARA E WOLTER
400 MONK CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
g
\ 1\ fr\
\ ~
\
) \ ~
) "\
I ~
!
~ !~
)
~. ~ ..~ ~
d~ ~.
\ r;:,'.b.. -~~
~&> g
\~ ~
\l ------- ~.~
l ~'
>l
(l)
>
t...
::l
CJ)
-f-J
.r-!
E
L
(l)
0..
0>
C
.r-!
"0
r-I
.r-!
::l
CO
'~j
"
"
"
~ I-:
ge: g 8
f~~,~ ~
ltJ.., m
~Il ~ ?S
t ~~.
~
C'~
"i
\
\
\.,
\
r} /7
/;
" /
" /
"<
"
"
~- . --
~-T7/LJ
~ I III I
\\ :
-\\\ :,. ,
- ,: ul
: \ 'I . ,ll
· I, IIi
[! .,
- I
~J
- '\
1\
,I
-Iii!
~.
II!
[i
- I
Ii
, I
I
~~. : J. ....~~
~ I
......C/')
L...:
Vi
Cl
Cl
c:)
OJ
Li)
"'-
I · ~ i
i!
,Oi!
ll!~1 :
:;~
00
UJ",
"'= ,
> ^ i
g:~ I
.,
.l :
~@I
~I&. I
I
I
;t
Gi m.~
'~,'~':o;,Q)
$::-. s'~n
:;::':~'II~
~i~~
B~~f
~ 08,.
'8;--~-:~,.'.'~.
II
o
~
"'C
UJ
Z
<(
..J ...
//
/'"
/
I
!
':1
i
~
i.
:4i
~
. ~
\
l
"'-
/
<(
:::>
~
H
I-
~:
,~
~
:J:
I-
<0
co
l!
~
~ 1
~ ~,~
~- &.]
~H i
r:::,~(j e
9. -it:~..
~;i1
~.1lf
~-~ t:l g
-io:(
~<:
~c:i"
ij:3,',~,~
~~~~'~
&;:~-Cl.
"g ;s,~~ ~
!.s~ tf~
~~tt$!..
:!_.,,~ ...-::a~ 1M
~-'~;e'~
~--'= :J_~,,:,:s<
~! ~~f:.
I ~
2. ~ f
;::: ~ ~
6*1
o
C\I
II
GiT-
;;
Gl
.ii>
<(
>...~.
~",,~
e
o
~
..
i
'"
~
'"
2
'<
~ "
5 8:'0
i;- bi ~
~ ll:'~
tIj Q ~
~ -~ ~ '~
~- g~g
ti'ii<~ .~
~'_:~~-'~: ,,~
CE'08-Ct.:_u
.:g .CJDll -a
::l . "., s:
.E,'..~',~ u;
~-:-:c 2
Q) .4J,;:t
E,~o O'IC
'-'_.g:,Ql~ '2 ~
0_:-- -0.- -0 .2
: :_~ --:a.~ ~_~
~---g~ 'g-8..
~= -.=-t:
Ul-viO
2, .2-E
o 0
CC"O
'" "'C:
"D "U 0
~
(b
~
t....
=:3
Cf)
0)
t:::
-r-i
~
ctS
t....
~
i-J
r---t
-r-i
::J
co
I
CI)
~
'\
'\
'\
ffi Ii:
<I> .... '"
~, ~. ~
a l:'\ ~
J: . Ctffi
~li! ~ ~
o 0 i5
5
~
II
CJ
~
'<<::
~
l~
i~
~~ J~]
- l! :s _
~ is ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ i!
~ - 1> ~ ::. !:I S I I I
~~6t"'...~cll_~.
~.dH~i~",ill
IHU'o~
.~ ; H H ~
.UULH
I I
B ~~ I :
~~t I I
~
1
.s~
~~. ~
~ e $
'"~t
tql
~~. ~~.
~.~ .~..~
~::: ~.'g
lE ~ Ii! ~
1,
!
..1'l1
g....~. {
.:;~':
1~811 I
Ha,;
tl8~~J
Hd..
L...:
Vi
a
a
c::)
Q;)
-
ll)'
-
it
'" -
",t~~
lS.",t
'" ~t I
~ i I ~
IH..~-&
'o!-i
fl;.!"~ClI
\
\
\
\
..
~
~
~
i':
I _~
c?.2:,~- \.
~'''', ~ ">~,
'----
06'.
""era;:.
.90:.<06'
L.U
Z
<(
...J/
/
/
/
/
/
/
(
i
i
..
~
"
1l
~
I
..
..
~
r
I
i
1<(
I=>
J(.!:5
i......
It-
II
g
l"
~
~
6L~06'
S!
~.
'\l,
~
"
\
\
"-
<0
~
ill
~
~-
I
I
I
09
@]
I
I
------1
t-
en
L.U
$:
t-
en
:c:
t-
CO
OJ
\
\
\
\
E~ <
f~.~]~.
:ll13-:
:~ -K;g,~ ~
~ll~!~
~1:::g-.e~:g
:,:e&.E'o -g .~
8':P!~E '~_~
>\....,.0000
.00;-0 ':>.
.',Q)'C"":'":'O'lIi
~t~~~~
t
~
..
It
~..
~t
,"~
be
.f!--~
g~
0> 0
c: ~ u.i
~..
.-r-I ~-Q..
"0"
.....-f 0
"r-I ~
:J ~ ~
em :~
o I-t
:::J ~-:r:
L i lD
E
+.J 0
:::J
~s:::.
"it)
~,ct)
'"
g
2
""
5' ~.2
~ 0 g
5 ~ ~
Vl ll: ,I;
'" <:> ~
.5:..: ~ .i$
~ 15' ~ !S
~'~~ ~
'S.,,:S ~
!Xl W...
~ :3 ~ .~
I:~
~t
I"
~!
"'(l])... ..!!
C,': . 0
~... r~ ~
1: c 2
Em~ ~s
g -8.~ 'g ~
E '1i.lI> .<) 0
0_ _ e
e -,_:511 '2 ~
'--' "=,~ (1)(1)
2 2. ~ -5','~
OOc:c
i: '~-g -8 ~
D 'U Q
. 0
0()