Loading...
PC Minutes 11-17-2015Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 there and all those listed criteria are in the report and I think it will be a really good project when it comes about. So any additional comments or questions? Hokkanen moved, Yusuf seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the official map of Highway 101 from Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) to Flying Cloud Drive (CSAH 61). All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: GATEWAY MEDICAL BUILDING, PLANNING CASE 2015-21: REQUEST FOR SIGN AND SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR A 4,300 SQUARE FOOT MEDICAL BUILDING ON 1.29 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED HIGHWAY AND TH BUSINESS SERVICES DISTRICT (BH) AND LOCATED AT 195 WEST 79 STREET ND (LOT 2, BLOCK 1, GATEWAY EAST 2 ADDITION). APPLICANT: RBSC CHANHASSEN, LLC. OWNER: CITY OF CHANHASSEN. Al-Jaff: Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. The site is located east of West th 79 Street, north of Highway 5 and west of Highway 101. It is bordered by the Western th Railroad to the north. Access to this site is off of West 79 Street. The site has an area of 1.29 acres. It is zoned Highway Business District. Just a brief history on this site. It was previously owned by Apple Red-E-Mix. In 1992 the City initiated the condemnation process and in October of ’93 Red-E-Mix vacated the property. In ’95 the City purchased the site so since ’95 this site has been, this entire area has been in City’s ownership. The eastern end was a taco shop and in ’91 the City initiated condemnations again of the taco shop. This was done in conjunction th with the realigning Highway 101, 79 Street and Highway 5. In April of 2005 the, let’s back up one second. In 1995 the City constructed a pedestrian bridge across Highway 5 and in 2005 the City approved the construction of 12,500 square foot building for a water treatment plant and an 8,100 square foot back wash tank and the building has been constructed. One thing that it would th be important to point out at this point, as you can see the site is accessed off of 79 Street. In order to get to this point, typically vehicles will be turning along Highway 5 onto Great Plains Boulevard. There is an access point right here that will take you to Dakota Retail. I’m sorry, Great Plains Center which is a newly constructed strip mall. Followed by another access point. This one is exit. Exiting only and it’s intended to serve the car wash. And then comes the turn th that would lead you onto West 79 Street and to the location of the site. So I needed to provide you with this background because later we will be talking about a directional sign and staff is recommending approval. This way you have the background and you know why we are recommending approval of it. So the application before you is for a 4,300 square foot medical office building and for an off premise directional sign. The building is proposed to be located along the southwest corner of the site. With a potential expansion in the future for a second building. The second building would be located east of the current proposed building. Maximum hard surface coverage in this district cannot exceed 65 percent. The applicant is proposing 26 percent so they are substantially below the maximum permitted. The ordinance requires 1 parking space per 150 square feet of medical office. This would translate to 26 7 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing 31 parking spaces so they exceed the minimum requirements. Trash enclosure is located in this area and it is north of the site. It will be screened from views from Highway 5 by both landscaping and then you also have the building as well. The architecture of the building. The design of the building is very attractive. It is intended to compliment buildings and structures in the surrounding area so you have the water plan along the west. There is the pedestrian bridge along, also within the vicinity of the building. One thing that as we were looking at the design of this building, one thing that we found to be very attractive and interesting is the V shaped design of the roof system. The roof top equipment would be located on top of the building and staff believes this is a very attractive roof top equipment screening. The other thing that we also need to point out is how it compliments the design of the water plant so the water plant is designed in a pitched shape and you have the exact same thing going on only in the opposite direction as far as the V of the building. Another element that also compliments the surrounding area is the galvanized metal that is used as a trellis around the building that is intended to compliment the design of the bridge. The materials that are used on the building are very durable. The applicant is proposing to use aggregate block. Rough faced block. Galvanized metal. Trellises. Glass windows. All 4 sides of this building have received equal attention and it is very well designed. One of the things that we mentioned earlier is the potential for a second building and you just need to, so this is the building that is currently proposed to be built in the future. This is what you would be seeing as you travel along Highway 5 westbound. I can’t guarantee the birds in the sky. Another thing that the applicant has done with this application is the landscaping. They have chosen to have vines that would, that are very colorful. They will compliment the design of the building. The same is true of the bushes and the trees. All of them are flowering and staff is very pleased with the overall design of the site. The site will incorporate patios along the east and west of the building. These patios will have benches, chairs, tables, bike racks. Signage on this site is intended to be located along the southwest corner and it will be a monument sign. The City Code allows these signs not to exceed 8 feet in height. 64 square feet in area. What the applicant is proposing is, has an area that is less as well as the height of the building, of the sign is 6 feet in this case. They’re also proposing to have an electronic message system along the top portion of the sign which is permitted by ordinance. Staff is recommending approval of the signage. The second part of the sign deals with the location of a directional sign to the site and it’s an off premise directional sign. The City Code is very clear that directional signs are permitted only in cases when access is confusing and as we talked at the beginning in describing the background of this site, access to this site is truly confusing and if you miss your turn you need to go back and try and circulate the area and hopefully you’d get it right the second time but we do believe that a directional sign is warranted in this case. Staff has developed a criteria for this sign and the majority of the criterions really deal with safety issues insuring that you are not within the sight triangle. Making sure that the trail is protected, so on and so forth. Since the staff report was written staff has added a couple of entries basically dealing with the ownership of the sign. The City will be owning and maintaining this sign. We have informed the applicant of this change to the staff report. We are also, one of the other entries that we added was the uniformity of the font and on th the sign. Again as mentioned earlier the sign would be located at the intersection of West 79 and Great Plains Boulevard and it would be outside the sight triangle. One of the other things 8 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 that was discussed, right now there is probably one of the largest bubbles of a cul-de-sac in the city of Chanhassen. It’s 120 feet wide and what the applicant is proposing to do is put an island in the center and staff will be working with the applicant on this location. There are some tweaks that need to take place and that’s very normal with applications that appear before the City. I need to point out that one of the things that the applicant had requested was parking along the cul-de-sac and because we have a well in that area staff is recommending that the bubble th portion be marked as no parking but the road itself, West 79 they are permitted to park along there. And we’re hoping that they wouldn’t need it because they do have ample parking on site. The other thing that we need to point out is the fact that this site is located adjacent to a regional trail that runs parallel to the southerly property line. The applicant is proposing to extend a sidewalk and we are currently working with the applicant to insure that, what they’re proposing is the best route. One of the options is to just come directly south and connect with the trail that is right here. What the applicant was proposing is actually to go around the cul-de-sac and then back down and then onto the trail. We do believe that most people will just take a shortcut. And with that staff does believe that this is a very good use of the land. It is an excellent project and we are recommending approval with conditions outlined in the staff report and I’d be happy to answer any questions. Aanenson: Mr. Chair I was just going to add a couple other comments. I’m not sure it was clear in our staff report but this is city owned property and we’ve had it for quite a while. We’re really excited with this use to come in there because it is difficult. We’ve had some other users that would be high trip generations which would be again we talk about the way finding. Where the off premise sign is still city property is why the position we took to the applicant would build on that sign but we’d maintain that property because it’s city owned property and that could provide for some other way finding in that area but we’re really pleased with how this project turned out. The applicant also owns the other parcel and we’re confident he will do the same due diligence to that site so we just think that’s what a great entrance to the city with that building. It really, really reflects kind of what’s in that area and a really nice design so we’re very happy about that but I just wanted to point that out that this is, the City has entered into a purchase agreement with Mr. Schold and he’s done a wonderful job working to get a great site plan. Aller: Thank you. I guess my question was with the V shape. I’m used to, we’re in Minnesota and there’s going to be a lot of snow sometime. Maybe not now. This week but what are we going to do with the snow? Is that a good weight bearing roof? Has that been discussed and then also it would act as a rain catcher. What are we going to do with runoff? Aanenson: Mr. Schold can answer but actually that architect also did the library here in front of City Hall. Pretty well known firm so we have confidence in that so. I don’t know if he may have some other. Aller: And then the water system that’s going to be placed in, I would love to know just how that works because it interests me. 9 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 Aanenson: The stormwater? Aller: The stormwater system because I know we’re replacing and we’re going to put a lot of hard cover on there. It’s still well under but there’s been some remediation and some clean up in the area and I think everybody’s going to be interested in just how that system works. Aanenson: Yeah, there was some contaminated soil. Phase 1 was done on that and actually a Phase 2 so that affords you a different track to go down for stormwater management but it does meet all the City requirements. I don’t know if you wanted to add anything else on that Paul. Oehme: Sure that, so it’s an underground system that we’re capturing the runoff from the parking lot into the building. It basically helps the rate control and some water quality benefits too but it’s an underground system that’s going to take some maintenance. It’s kind of in lieu of your typical NURP pond system so it’s basically an underground chamber piled with rocks on the bottom with basically a storm pipe more or less zig zagging it through the system so that’s once, when rain comes, larger rain events come it kind of fills up but the rate, the outlet more or less stays the same so it’s been used in the city in the past. I think the Toll Line parking lot has a similar system that’s being used here. The Cub Foods. Aanenson: Powers Pointe. Oehme: Powers Pointe. Cub Foods in Shorewood over on 41 and Highway 7, that has the same system in it too so it’s been used. It’s a technology that’s been around for a while now. Aller: Great. Additional questions? Weick: I’m sorry, oh go ahead. Madsen: I have a question about the report mentions some soil contamination and that it’s apparently contained and I’m just wondering if it has been fully remediated or is there still contaminated soil and is there any risk to disturbing that soil during the excavation stage? Aanenson: No. So that was done with the Phase 1 environmental and then they actually did a Phase 2 environmental and so that’s the reason why we’re you know, affords you to do the other water treatment so we’re not, we’re staying outside of the disturbed areas and that’s been remediated so, so we’re confident that we’re not going to make, disturb anything that’s been fixed already. Madsen: Oh okay. Aller: Mr. Weick. 10 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 Weick: Yeah. Two questions. One, several of the diagrams in the site plan here and the report reference the future building just as a point of clarification. We’re not, we’re not making any recommendations based on the future? Al-Jaff: No. Aanenson: That has to come back through the whole site plan review. Yep. Weick: Okay, just to clarify. Aanenson: And I just wanted to clarify that the owner. Weick: Yep. Aanenson: Mr. Schold owns that property too so because he’s done such a nice job on the existing building he wouldn’t want to deter or do anything that would you know detract from that. Weick: Understood. And then the off premise directional sign. Was that a suggestion of the City or a request from the applicant? Aanenson: When we went into the purchase agreement there were 2 things that they requested. One was, he felt strongly about landscaping and the outdoor experience that he wanted with his building and so he always wanted to put the island in so that was part of the purchase agreement as was the off premise sign because he recognized that, just to make sure there was proper queuing to find your way in there. Everybody that looked at it before wanted to try to get off of Great Plains. You can’t. MnDOT is too close and so you know that’s why we thought this was a great use up there that was kind of more a directional, I mean a destination as opposed to a convenience. Weick: Thank you. Aller: Additional questions or comments? Yusuf: Just, on page 13. The picture that you have, are we intending for 2 way directional traffic around that, around that island? Aanenson: This one? Yusuf: Yep right there. Tietz: The traffic flow. 11 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 Yusuf: Yep this. Al-Jaff: The intent is for, one of the concerns that the engineering department had was would vehicles go around the cul-de-sac or would they just go in and out of the site. So typically this is what you would see happen. However because of this layout one of staff’s recommendations was potentially creating a tear drop design for the island and change the entrance into this site so that traffic would be moving straight into the parking lot and out so you won’t be going around the cul-de-sac necessarily. Yusuf: Do you anticipate any traffic concerns for users who aren’t too familiar with the routes? Or not knowing how to navigate that island. Aanenson: I’d just say that’s one of the conditions that we’re still working on. Yusuf: Okay. Aanenson: We want to meet the applicant’s desire to landscape it. We also want to make sure that we have safety issues addressed and as we talked about there’s a well there that we want to make sure there’s nobody parking in front of so those are the few things that we’re working on. We’re trying to meet some deadlines here and so we’re going to address that. Oehme: Potentially looking at maybe some signage out there and one of the criteria that we looked at too for the no parking was, there’s some delivery trucks from the water treatment plant and then from the automotive building, business just to the west of here that there’s some bigger trucks that deliver so we need to accommodate that flow of traffic there so it’s, the volumes on the end of the cul-de-sac here are very, very low so I think that’s going to help you know with the traffic flow and at the access points. The geometrics of where the driveway is, that kind of is, that’s where we get into a little bit of conflict I think in terms of where the traffic flow will be so we just want to make sure that maybe there’s some striping out there we’re going to look at and maybe there’s some signage too that we need to enhance it. Like we said we might want to change the configuration of the island too to help clarify where traffic’s supposed to go so those are the kind of things that we’re looking at. Yusuf: Thank you. Aller: Great. Any additional questions at this time? Okay. If we can have the applicant come forward and state your name and address for the record and your representation. Randy Schold: Randy Schold and my address is 8925 Twin Lakes Crossing, Eden Prairie. Aller: Welcome Mr. Schold. Randy Schold: Thank you. 12 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 Aller: Can you tell us about your project? Randy Schold: Oh I think Sharmeen has done a wonderful job. The interest for us is, has been in the first phase of the project and it’s to provide a medical office building. I’ve looked at the site for years as it’s sat vacant and thought definitely that it’s under used in it’s present state and wondered with the good visibility why and I think Kate or Sharmeen mentioned the access dilemma and if I’m not mistaken Kate I think you mentioned access off Great Plains but what I think several developers have made an attempt over the years to do is to get access off of 101 and that’s not acceptable and not going to happen so that’s caused some development problems quite frankly. As a real estate developer as I am access is critical and although we’d like to think that cars are becoming less important and walking and biking and all of those important things are, that we all believe in are critical. The car and parking often drives these deals and so the question is how do you get people in a car to find their way to this site and so that’s, that’s all about the way finding concerns frankly that we’ve had from the outset of being interested in this site. And the second concern has been what is just really a confusing and odd cul-de-sac which serves really nobody or a few trucks and is completely over sized in my mind. And without a doubt every consultant and individual we have out at the site to take a look at it is just baffled by why that cul-de-sac exists so our attempt, my attempt as a developer is to find a way to, and the design team, find a way to bridge this gap between I think what is a valid concern and vision or desire from a planning perspective to have this as a wonderful gateway site with a nice building and a building that is welcoming to the city of Chanhassen as one approaches, traveling westerly on 5 but there’s this conflict where the cul-de-sac is, looks like it should be serving a light industrial use. So that really is the reason, and if there were other ideas on how to humanize that cul-de-sac and bring it down to a scale where it’s more compatible with office you know I think we’d be all ears and this was our design teams attempt in terms of the island to try to, try to make the site just more welcoming. So aside from that I think the site is beautiful. It’s got great visibility. The feeling of it now in it’s kind of rough state, we want definitely to tamper with but we don’t want to destroy the kind of garden landscape, heavily landscaped aspects of it. To us that’s what Chanhassen is. It’s different than being in the city. You know it has this wonderful kind of village feel to it and we want to reinforce those feelings and the design team is a terrific team as Kate mentioned, or Sharmeen. They designed your library. They’re working at the Arboretum presently. They’re, so I thought they would be a good fit for this project and, and I think they’ve done a wonderful job with the design of the building. In answer to your question about the V shaped roof, not everything is engineered but certainly there are lots of V shaped roofs even in Minnesota and in addition to the drainage going the two ways the roof would be canted towards the roof drain which would then tie into the system that the City Engineer has described. Aller: Great. Any questions? Tietz: I just have a comment. 13 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Sure. I just, I think it’s a great solution for really a, as you said an under utilized but a sliver site that’s been there since we moved out here. I remember when Apple Valley Red-E- Mix was there so it’s been there a long time. And I also want to commend you on the selection of the architect and the proposed design. I think it’s a very fitting solution to the site. The scale and the appearance and I also, I think MSR also did the bridge back in the. Aanenson: Yes… Tietz: In the mid 90’s. Randy Schold: That’s correct. Tietz: Yeah so they have quite a history here in Chanhassen. I think it’s great to have a good architect. Randy Schold: Thank you. Weick: I have a question and if it’s not appropriate let me know. Can we speak to the type of business that will be in the building? Aanenson: I think right now it’s still proprietary but it will be medical related yeah. Weick: It is, okay. And the reason I ask is to me it’s relevant to the off premise sign in the sense that, what amount of you know unique consumer visits would you have there or is it appointment based? Aanenson: It’s appointment based so I think you would have kind of your regular clientele like you would with any other you know medical office. Weick: Okay. That’s just kind of what I was getting at. Aanenson: Yeah and I think that’s why we felt that it was really a good fit because you don’t have people trying to meet at a restaurant somewhere that can’t get, find out how to get there so you would have your regular clientele going there by appointment. Weick: Okay. Aller: Any additional questions? Thank you sir. Randy Schold: Thank you. 14 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 Aller: At this point in time we’ll open up the public hearing portion of this item and anyone in the audience wishing to come forward and speak either for or against the item can do so at this time. Seeing no one come forward I’ll close the public hearing and open it up for commissioner comments. Madsen: It’s a beautiful building. Hokkanen: I think it’s going to be a beautiful building as you drive into Chanhassen. I think the aesthetics are just really nice. Aller: Any additional? I think it’s a unique piece of property. It’s been totally under utilized and the City’s going to increase it’s tax base ultimately as a result of it. It will come off the non- tax rolls and be put on the tax rolls but more than that when you drive in, we talk about all the construction down south by the 61 corridor and how that’s going to be a gateway from the Chaska area and the Shakopee area. Well this is one that really separates us from the Eden Prairie area and I think that it’s important to have that, it’s like if it comes out the way it’s depicted in the drawings it will be a breath of fresh air. Kind of come into Chanhassen. I think it’s a beautiful addition and architecture and I really enjoyed looking at the articulation of the building not only by the windows and the physical design but using the landscaping. The vines and things as part of that. I think that’s going to be really nice. So with that. Weick: I do. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Weick: I’m not opposed to the off, it sounds like I am but I’m not opposed to the off premise directional sign. I will say however I personally I don’t think we need it. I think that people, especially in a use that is primarily appointment driven, you know people use. Hokkanen: Google map. Weick: Phones and maps, you know. I don’t know, I don’t know if we need any signs to be quite honest with you, let alone more signs. So personally I don’t think we need it. I wouldn’t oppose this because of the directional signage and certainly if the City has other uses as well that’s great in the future but wanted to put it out there that I personally don’t think we need an off premise directional sign for a use like this. Aller: Point well taken. Any additional comments? Then with that I’ll entertain any motions. Undestad: I’ll make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Undestad. 15 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 Undestad: That the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve site plan review for the construction of a 4,300 square foot medical office building on 1.29 acres of property zoned Highway and Business Services District, an off premise directional sign and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Tietz: Second. Aller: Having a motion from Commissioner Undestad and seconded by Commissioner Tietz. Any additional comments or questions? Undestad moved, Tietz seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the site plan consisting of a 4,300 square foot medical office building, Planning Case 2015-21, as shown in plans dated received October 16, 2015, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resources: 1. The applicant shall increase bufferyard plantings along Highway 5 and the north property line to meet minimum requirements. Planning: 1. All rooftop equipment must be screened. 2. The materials used on the trash enclosure must be the same material as the building. 3. Off-premise direction sign criteria: a. The sign shall not exceed 8 feet in height. b. The sign area shall not exceed 32 square feet. c. The sign shall be located outside of the sight triangle and shall not interfere with the driver’s intersection sight distance. d. The sign shall maintain a minimum of 10 feet from the back of the curb. e. The sign shall maintain a 1.5 foot separation from the trail. f. The sign shall not be illuminated. g. The sign shall not interfere with snow removal operations. h. The sign lettering shall not exceed 6 inches and have a uniform style. i. The sign shall only include the names and logos of the businesses and a directional arrow. 16 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 j. The sign design shall compliment the design and materials of the proposed building. k. The sign shall not obstruct driver’s views of any city owned street signage or railroad signage. l. The sign will be owned and maintained by the City. m. The applicant shall build the sign. 4. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize design of the directional sign. 5. All signs must meet city ordinance. A sign permit is required prior to erecting any signs. Building: 1.The building(s) are required to have automatic fire-extinguishing systems. 2.Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3.Any retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4.Detailed occupancy-related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. 5.The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Fire Marshal: 1.An additional fire hydrant will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for exact location. 2.A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. Engineering: 1.The trash enclosure must be relocated, or the developer must enter into an encroachment agreement with the City. 2.An easement for the maintenance and construction of the cul-de-sac island shall be recorded with the purchase agreement of this property. 3.All easements, existing and proposed, shall be labeled in the plan set. 4.The developer’s engineer shall provide a separate “existing conditions” plan page to show the existing conditions and topography of the site as well as existing easements on the property. 17 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 5.Revise grading south of proposed building to minimize channelization of flows and to maintain drainage on the subject property. The latter may be excused if permission granted from MnDOT. 6.Project designer shall work with city staff to assure accurate contacts are included on sheet SW-1. 7.References must be to appropriate storm water management BMPs. No infiltration is proposed on-site. (see DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING WATERS on sheet SW-1) 8.Sheet SW1 shall include Rice Marsh Lake as the receiving water. 9.Sheet SW-1 indicates that there will only be 0.07 acres of new impervious. Staff calculates the new impervious to be 0.32 acres. The SWPPP shall be amended to accurately reflect this. 10.Sheet SW2 – SOILS AND NATIVE TOPSOIL shall be amended to indicate that six inches of topsoil is required on all disturbed areas to be used as green space. 11.Sheet SW2 shall be amended to indicate that the city must receive a copy of the dewatering plan and approve before any dewatering can take place. 12.Note shall be added to SW2 indicating that all outlets must be stabilized within 24 hours of connection. 13.The graded slope south of the proposed building shall be stabilized with an appropriate rapid stabilization method for offsite discharges. 14.The pipe configuration used to outlet underground system into pond shall be made as shallow as possible and with as large a drop as possible into STM MH1 so as to dissipate energy in the system and minimize rates. Ex. Raise SW invert by 1.5 feet to 948.3. 15.Sheet C3 shall use the city silt fence detail which shows that wooden posts are not allowed. 16.Sheet C3 shall use city detail for rock construction entrance or shall be amended to show that geotextile fabric must be placed under the rock. 17.A final stabilization plan will be needed. This is typically the landscaping plan. The sheet included shows only woody vegetation south of the building to the property line. This must indicate how this will be stabilized. 18.The applicant must meet the requirements of all other jurisdictional agencies, including the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. 19.The applicant must evaluate other methods of volume reduction, such as capture and use, to achieve volume reduction to the maximum extent practicable. 20.The applicant shall provide the city with a drainage map corresponding to the provided HydroCAD™ model. This shall be used to determine if pre- and post-construction rates are consistent with city requirements. 21.The applicant shall provide water quality modeling to the city for review and approval. 18 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 22.The sump at CB 1 on C1 shall be deepened to three feet and a device such as the SAFL baffle, the Preserver or equivalent shall be installed. 23.An operations and maintenance manual shall be developed and made available to the City. 24.The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement for the stormwater facility with either the watershed district or the city. 25.The plans shall show locations proposed for stockpile areas. 26.The plans shall show existing and proposed elevations at the lot corners and the corners of the proposed structure. 27.The developer’s engineer shall continue to work with City staff to find a geometric layout that would successfully route vehicles and minimize conflict. 28.The plans must label the dimensions of the parking spaces, drive aisle and the 26-foot by10- foot turnaround at the end of the aisle. 29.An additional plan sheet must be provided that does not show the “Phase 2” construction, but instead illustrates what is to be constructed on the site in “Phase 1” only. 30.The plans must show the driveway entrance grade. 31.The bituminous trail shall be revised into a concrete sidewalk that shall be owned and maintained by the property owner. 32.The plans shall be revised to show dimensions for the width of the proposed sidewalks and trails. 33.These plans must comply with all ADA regulations for the site. 34.The developer’s engineer shall work with City staff to determine if a connection can be made directly to the switchback trail that leads to the pedestrian bridge across Trunk Highway 5. 35.All of the service utilities shall be privately owned and maintained. 36.Fees for City water and sanitary sewer connections shall be collected with the building permit. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. Aller: Those of you at home wishing to follow this item, it will be before the City Council. Aanenson: Next Monday night. Aller: Next Monday. Aanenson: It’s a quick turn around. 19 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2015 Aller: Fairly quick so it’s not the normal turn around. Tune in or come on down to watch it November 23, 2015 right here in the City Council chambers. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Aller: I’d like to thank Commissioner Weick for filling in for me at that meeting. You did a great job chairing. Weick: Thank you. Aller: Can someone please note those Minutes? Commissioner Weick noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated October 6, 2015 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aanenson: Sure, so because we haven’t met we’ve got a few items that you have taken action on that now the City Council has. One being the variance that was on Red Cedar Point for the shoreland, the retaining walls. Then also the request for a, the indoor gun range. That was also rd approved by the City Council and then on November, I think that should say November 3. The thrd 9 meeting because you did not have a meeting on the 3. There was no items going forward so. Following up on that we’ll go through the future planning items. So at your meeting on st December 1, I know there may be one person, if anybody else knows that they wouldn’t be available on that meeting. Okay, so we have a quorum. So we have an interim use request for a senior daycare so that’s pretty straight forward but they do require an interim use permit and then we’re going to have a public hearing on the code amendments that are, that you have jurisdiction over which would be Chapters 18 and 20. There’s some other ones that would just go forward to the City Council. So with that we are working on quite a few projects in town right now so we anticipate the first part of the year that we’ll have quite a few projects going on. I think that’s all I had. Oh I had one other announcement. A week today will be the bridge opening so that will th be November 24 at 11:00 a.m. The new bridge at 101. They’ll have a ceremony down there at 11:00 a.m. Anybody that’s interested in attending so pretty exciting. We’ve got the 61 corridor done. We’re working on now, the Hennepin County’s got that side done. Mr. Oehme and myself will be meeting with the City of, excuse me Carver County to talk about the planning going to the west of the rest of the 61. Just the upgrade of that section of road. They’re working on that now too so that meeting actually starts tomorrow. The first kick off meeting so things going on and then we’ve now just talked about the 101 project so as we move south. I think one of the things that both Mr. Oehme and myself have heard some of those properties on the north end of that, they’re ready to develop. There’s some properties there so getting that infrastructure 20