Recorded Resolution 2015-86 Revoking CUP 1984-07CAMPBELL KNUTSON
February 29, 2016
Ms. Kim Meuwissen
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re: Miscellaneous Recorded Documents
Dear Ms. Meuwissen:
Y
MAR P 3 2016
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
Please find enclosed, for the City's files, the following original recorded documents:
Site Plan Agreement dated December 8, 2014 with SCP PE Chan, LLC,
recorded January 25, 2016 as document number A622416;
2. Encroachment Agreement dated December 18, 2015 with Christopher and
Kathryn Atterberry, recorded December 28, 2015 as document number
A621204;
183816v4
Encroachment Agreement dated September 16, 2015 with Michael and Kerry
Marrou, recorded January 15, 2016 as document number T198031;
Resolution 2016-08 Approving Conditional Use Permit 2016-02 to operate an
adult daycare facility recorded February 4, 2016 as document number
A10284976;
Encroachment Agreement dated January 25, 2016 with Robert and Katie
Goggins, recorded February 4, 2016 as document number A622833;
Resolution 2015-86 Revoking CUP 1984-07 for a horse stable, recorded
January 14, 2016 as document number A621978;
Resolution 2015-87 Revoking CUP 1985-04 for a bed and breakfast, recorded
January 14, 2016 as document number A621979; and
Page 2
February 29, 2016
lK' Resolution 2015-88 Revoking CUP 1996-04 for an amateur radio tower, recorded
January 15, 2016 as document number A622049.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
Jean lbl. Olson Le al Assistant
g
/jmo
Enclosures
183816v4
Document No. A621978
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Certified Recorded on -January 14, 2016 2:55 PM
Fee: $46.00
1111111111111111111 Luke C Kranz
621978 County Recorder
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY' OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, duly appointed and acting Deputy Clerk for the City of Chanhassen,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of Resolution No.
2015-86 "Resolution Revoking Conditional Use Permit #1984-07 For A Horse Stable"
adopted by the Chanhassen City Council on December 14, 2015 with the original copy now
on file in my office and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof.
Witness my hand and official seal at Chanhassen, Minnesota, this 17`h day
of December, 2015.
i/l
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: —_ December 14, 2015 RESOLUTION NO: 2015-86
MOTION BY: McDonald SECONDED BY: Tiornhom
A RESOLUTION REVOKING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #1984-07 FOR A HORSE STABLE
WHEREAS, the subject property, located at 675 Lakota Lane, received a conditional use
permit for a horse stable on August 22, 1984, Conditional Use Permit #1984-07; and
WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit #1984-07 was recorded in the Office of the County
Recorder in Carver County, Minnesota, as Document No. 60734 in Book 79 of Misc. page 277-278 on
August 23, 1984; and
WHEREAS, the subject property was rezoned from Single -Family Residence District (R-1)
to Agricultural Estate District (A-2) on December 15, 1986, as part of Ordinance No. 80; and
WHEREAS, city staff visited the subject property and spoke with the property owner of the
site to verify compliance with the conditions of the conditional use permit and discovered that the
conditional use permit was not needed for the property since horse stables are a permitted accessory
use in the Agricultural Estate District (A-2), per City code Sec. 20-573; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after notice and public hearing, reviewed Conditional Use
Permit #1984-07 for Section 36 Township 116 Range 023 IN NW1/4 DESC AS: COMM AT A PT
WHERE W LINE NW 1/4 INTERSECTS NLY R -O -W OF RR & TH ELY ALONG NLY R -O -W
292' TO INTERSECT WITH ELY R -O -W HWY 101 BEING PT OF BEG TH NELY ALONG
ELY R -O -W HWY 101 WHOSE COURSE IS AS FOLLOWS DEFL LEFT FROM NLY R -O -W
OF RR 70* 4 (PID: 250362300).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby
revokes Conditional Use Permit #1984-07.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 14s' day December of 2015.
ATT �"
T dd Gerhardt, City Manager
YES NO
Laufenburger
Campion
McDonald
Ryan
Tjomhom
Denny Lau nburger, ayor
ABSENT
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
IN RE:
The revocation of Conditional Use Permit #1984-07 for a Horse Stable. On August 22, 1984, the
City Council approved Conditional Use Permit #1984-07 to allow the stabling of four (4) horses on
an R-1, Single Family Residence District, property located at 675 Lakota Lane. The subject
property was rezoned in 1986 from Single -Family Residence District (R-1) to Agricultural Estate
District (A-2). Horse stables are a permitted accessory use in the Agricultural Estate District (A-2),
per City Code Section 20-573, making the existing conditional use permit unnecessary.
On December 14, 2015, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to
consider the revocation of Conditional Use Permit #1984-07. The City Council conducted a
public hearing on the proposed conditional use permit, which was preceded by published and
mailed notice. The City Council heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak
and now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Agriculture Estate (A-2).
2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density.
3. The legal description of the property is:
Section 36 Township 116 Range 023 IN NW 1/4 DESC AS: COMM AT A PT WHERE W
LINE NWl/4 INTERSECTS NLY R -O -W OF RR & TH ELY ALONG NLY R -O -W 292,
TO INTERSECT WITH ELY R -O -W HWY 101 BEING PT OF BEG TH NELY ALONG
ELY R -O -W HWY 101 WHOSE COURSE IS AS FOLLOWS DEFL LEFT FROM NLY R -
O -W OF RR 70* 4 (PID: 250362300).
4. Conditional Use Findings:
a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or
general welfare of the neighborhood or city.
Finding: There will be no changes on the property due to the revocation of the
conditional use permit. The revocation of the conditional use permit will not be
detrimental or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general
welfare of the neighborhood or city.
b. Will be consistent with the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and this chapter.
Finding: The revocation of the conditional use permit is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and complies with Chanhassen City Code.
c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in
appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not
change the essential character of that area.
Finding: There will not be any required alteration to the property for the revocation of
the conditional use permit. Therefore, the appearance and existing or intended character
of the neighborhood in the general vicinity will not be changed.
d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses.
Finding: There will not be any required work done on the property for the revocation of
the conditional use permit. Therefore, there will not be any hazardous or disturbing
conditions for existing or planned neighboring uses.
e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems
and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the
persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use.
Finding: There will be no alternation in services required by the revocation of the
conditional use permit. The property is adequately serviced by the city or through
services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the property.
f. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be
detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
Finding: The use of public facilities and services will not be altered by the revocation of
the conditional use permit.
g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of
operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because
of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash.
Finding: The revocation of the conditional use permit will not involve uses that have the
potential to create any adverse conditions, as previously stated.
h. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or
interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares.
Finding: Access by motorized vehicles to the property is currently adequate and will not
be altered by the revocation of the conditional use permit.
2
i. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or
historic features of major significance.
Finding: The revocation of the conditional use permit will not result in the destruction,
loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance.
j. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area.
Finding: The property is currently aesthetically compatible with their surrounding area
and this compatibility will not be changed by the revocation of their conditional use
permit.
I Will not depreciate surrounding property values.
Finding: The revocation of the conditional use permit will not have any effect on the
surrounding property values.
1. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article.
Finding: The revocation of the conditional use permit is consistent with City Code
regarding Conditional Use Permits.
5. The staff report, Planning Case #2015-25, dated December 14, 2015, prepared by Drew
Ingvalson, et al, is incorporated herein.
DECISION
The City Council approves the Revocation of Conditional Use Permit #1984-07, Planning
Case #2015-25.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 14a' day of December, 2015.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
(SEAL)
BY:
Denny L fenburge ,Mayor