Attachment 2. Memo from Toole - Lane width standards and approach for Bluff Creek Boulevard dated June 13, 2017TooleDes gnGroup IIL
212 Third Aveiue Norti+,
Suac 476
Mit ,apo[Ls, MN 55401
612.534.4094
.- .uoedesian.com
MEMORANDUM
Date:
6/13/17
To:
Kendra Lindahl, AICP
Organization:
Landform
From:
Christopher Bower, P.E.
Project:
Avienda
Re:
Lane Width Standards and Approach for Bluff Creek Boulevard
Existing Conditions
The proposed roadway is an extension of Bluff Creek Boulevard, which was previously constructed with
16' lane widths, as shown below. The existing 16' roadway width provides enough space for an
emergency vehicle to pass a stopped car in the unlikely event that a vehicle impedes emergency access.
Design Intent
The goal of our design for Bluff Creek Boulevard is to create a roadway corridor that accommodates a
range of motorized and non -motorized users, and encourages users to walk and bike between
destinations within and beyond the proposed development. Our roadway design helps achieve this goal
through the use of landscaping, medians, frequent pedestrian crossings and the overall minimization of
the roadway cross section. This creates a more comfortable and safe environment for all users —
something that can be experienced on existing Bluff Creek Boulevard, especially when compared with
larger, less comfortable roadways such as Lyman or Powers Boulevard, whose wide roadway sections
and lack of landscaping lead to higher vehicle speeds and longer (and less comfortable) pedestrian
crossings.
Design Standards
Bluff Creek Boulevard will be designed in accordance with MnDOT's State Aid Standards (Minn. Rules
Chapter 8820), along with applicable AASHTO and MnDOT design guidelines.
The proposed Bluff Creek Boulevard will be a Collector or Local roadway with ADT < 15,000. Per Minn.
Rules 8820.9936, applicable standards and proposed dimensions are shown below:
Design Criteria
Minimum Standard
Proposed Bluff Creek Design
Design Speed
30-40 mph
30 mph
Lane Width
11,feet (wherever possible, lane
widths of 12 feet, rather than
11 feet, should be used)
12 feet
Median Curb Reaction Distance
1 foot
2 feet
Minimum Median Width
4 feet
7 feet
Outside Curb Reaction Distance
2 feet
2 feet
Clear Zone (area adjacent to
roadway that is clear of fixed
objects, such as trees)
1.5 feet (when posted speed is
40-45 mph)
At least 5 feet
The proposed roadway meets or exceeds all applicable State Aid design standards, and as designed
should be wholly adequate for the intended use.
Impact of Lane Widths on User Safety
MnDOT's current technical memorandum on lane widths (No. 13 -18 -TS -07), includes a discussion on the
role of lane widths in both pedestrian and motor vehicle crashes. An excerpt from this technical
memorandum is included below, with certain sections underlined for emphasis.
Urban and Suburban Highways and Streets
Special care is demanded for design in urban and suburban environments, where often limited
space must be balanced between the various transportation modes and among geometric
design elements. Lane width is particularly important on multi -lane streets, where even small
variations in design values are multiplied across the cross section. One research study has found
that narrower lanes on urban and suburban streets were generally associated with lower crash
frequencies compared to wider lanes. (An exception to this is four -lane undivided streets, where
9- and 10 -foot lanes have been associated with higher crash frequencies than wider lanes
respectively.) Furthermore, narrower cross sections reduce crossing distances and have been
associated with reduced travel speeds, both direct factors in the safety of pedestrians. For these
reasons, lane widths on urban and suburban streets should be designed no wider than to
adequately accommodate the vehicular traffic volume and composition. General design
guidance is as follows:
Lane widths of 11 feet are a good fit for a wide variety of urban arterials and collectors. 11 -foot
lanes are fully adequate for vehicular operation on low -speed facilities and can be thought of as
roughly equivalent in terms of comfort and usability to 12 -foot lanes on high-speed roads and
streets. 11 -foot lanes are also appropriate on high-speed facilities under favorable geometric
conditions.
Lane widths of 10 feet are typically most suitable where truck and bus volumes are relatively
low and design speeds are 35 mph or less, as well as in more constrained circumstances.
Lane widths of 12 feet tend to be most applicable in high-speed or high -demand circumstances.
On low -speed facilities, the use of 12 -foot lanes should be limited to very high demand
conditions or to limited -access roadways, so as to avoid wherever practical the drawbacks often
associated with overly wide cross sections, such as excessive speed and longer pedestrian
exposure.
Multimodal considerations
Mobility and safety apply to all modes of travel in the right of way. The ability of non -motorized
users to travel along and across streets and highways safely and comfortably is a principal
measure of livability. As discussed earlier in this section, the lane width selection for urban and
suburban streets will often significantly affect vehicular operating speeds and the distances
pedestrians face in crossing roadways. Bicycles and pedestrians are among the most vulnerable
roadway users, and vehicular speed and exposure are the two primary factors in non -motorized
users' crash frequency and severity.
Conclusion
The most current research and policy has found that overly wide roadway sections can result in higher
vehicle speeds, longer pedestrian crossings, and ultimately results in an increase in both crash frequency
and severity. The proposed roadway section is already wider than recommended in current MnDOT
guidance in the interest of corridor consistency and conformance with State Aid design standards. Any
further increase in the roadway width cannot be supported by existing best practices or guidance, and
should be expected to lead to a reduction in overall user safety.
Ensuring timely and effective emergency response is of paramount importance, along with promoting
roadway user safety. We hope to arrive at a roadway design that accomplishes both goals, and we
believe that maintaining the existing 16' wide roadway section is the appropriate response.