Loading...
CC Staff Report 09-24-18CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Ordinance 635: Amendment to Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to Allow Additional Signage for Target Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2. Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­15 PROPOSED MOTION If the City Council decides to approve the amendment: “The Chanhassen City Council approves the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." If the City Council decides to deny the amendment: “The Chanhassen City Council denies the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Target is requesting an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permit signage along their building’s north façade at 851 West 78th Street. The PUD currently limits signage to two street frontages and the building has existing signage along its western and southern frontages. Target recently added a liquor section to the northwest corner of their store as part of extensive interior and exterior renovations and feels that signage along the West 78 th Street frontage is needed to provide visibility for the new liquor section. Other buildings within the PUD already have signage along three street frontages. In reviewing the requested PUD amendment, staff examined the general sign code that would govern the property in the absence of a PUD ordinance, other PUDs, and sign plans within the city, and the existing signage within the PUD. Staff believes that amending the PUD to allow signage along each street frontage would be in line with the city’s general sign code and the treatment of similar properties. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed PUD amendment. (A full breakdown and analysis of the requested amendment can be found in the attached staff report.) BACKGROUND CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectOrdinance 635: Amendment to Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to Allow Additional Signage forTargetSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2.Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­15PROPOSED MOTIONIf the City Council decides to approve the amendment:“The Chanhassen City Council approves the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned UnitDevelopment, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision."If the City Council decides to deny the amendment:“The Chanhassen City Council denies the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned UnitDevelopment, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYTarget is requesting an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permitsignage along their building’s north façade at 851 West 78th Street. The PUD currently limits signage to two streetfrontages and the building has existing signage along its western and southern frontages. Target recently added a liquorsection to the northwest corner of their store as part of extensive interior and exterior renovations and feels thatsignage along the West 78 th Street frontage is needed to provide visibility for the new liquor section. Other buildingswithin the PUD already have signage along three street frontages.In reviewing the requested PUD amendment, staff examined the general sign code that would govern the property inthe absence of a PUD ordinance, other PUDs, and sign plans within the city, and the existing signage within the PUD.Staff believes that amending the PUD to allow signage along each street frontage would be in line with the city’sgeneral sign code and the treatment of similar properties.The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed PUD amendment.(A full breakdown and analysis of the requested amendment can be found in the attached staff report.) BACKGROUND Chanhassen Retail Center PUD: On October 26, 1992, the City Council gave final approval for the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD and Target project. The PUD stipulated that wall signage was limited to a maximum of two street frontages. On February 8, 2010, the City Council approved an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD that allowed for the use of LED lights and adopted the Central Business District standards for the PUD’s setbacks, height, landscape, lot cover, and other standards not stipulated by the PUD. On December 6, 2017, sign permits were issued for revised signage along Target's south and west elevations.  On December 28, 2017, a building permit was issued for an interior and exterior remodel of the Target store. On February 12, 2018, the City Council approved an off­sale intoxicating liquor license for Target.  On September 4, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed PUD amendment. On September 10, 2018, the City Council discussed signage and Planned Unit Developments during the work session. DISCUSSION During the Public Hearing, local business owner Michael Clausen expressed his opposition to the proposed amendment. He noted that when he opened his business five years ago, he had expressed interest in having signage along three sides of his building but had been told by city staff that it was only permitted along two sides. He expressed his understanding that City Code limits signage to two sides per building. He did not feel it was fair to change the rules for Target, and felt they should be held to the same standard as every other business. Commissioner Madsen asked staff if they could address his comments. Staff replied that the city’s base sign ordinance allows one sign per street frontage, but that different development’s PUDs and sign plans may restrict the number of street frontages. Staff noted that eleven of the PUDs and sign plans surveyed limited their business to two street frontages, and that if the speaker’s business was located in one of those, he would have been informed that he was only allowed signage on two elevations. Chairman Aller asked for clarification as to the potential impact of the proposed amendment. Staff clarified that it would allow all businesses within the PUD to one wall sign per street frontage, as provided for in the base sign code. Commissioner Madsen asked how many signs a business zoned Central Business District (CBD) is allowed if it is not in a PUD. Staff responded that they would be entitled to signage along each street frontage. The Commissioners expressed concern that businesses within the PUD and CBD all be treated fairly. They expressed interest in keeping the PUD internally consistent and making sure that all businesses within it were governed by the same provisions. Commissioner Madsen questioned the need for additional signage on Target. Chairman Aller expressed the opinion that the new liquor store was essentially a new service that may require additional advertising. Commissioner Tietz asked staff how this request related to the recently passed pick­ up/drive­up sign ordinance. Staff responded that the pick­up/drive­up signs change was citywide and fell under the category of directional signage. Commissioner Undestad stated that retail is changing and that signage needs are changing with it. He expressed support for changing it at the PUD level. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectOrdinance 635: Amendment to Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to Allow Additional Signage forTargetSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2.Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­15PROPOSED MOTIONIf the City Council decides to approve the amendment:“The Chanhassen City Council approves the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned UnitDevelopment, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision."If the City Council decides to deny the amendment:“The Chanhassen City Council denies the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned UnitDevelopment, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYTarget is requesting an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permitsignage along their building’s north façade at 851 West 78th Street. The PUD currently limits signage to two streetfrontages and the building has existing signage along its western and southern frontages. Target recently added a liquorsection to the northwest corner of their store as part of extensive interior and exterior renovations and feels thatsignage along the West 78 th Street frontage is needed to provide visibility for the new liquor section. Other buildingswithin the PUD already have signage along three street frontages.In reviewing the requested PUD amendment, staff examined the general sign code that would govern the property inthe absence of a PUD ordinance, other PUDs, and sign plans within the city, and the existing signage within the PUD.Staff believes that amending the PUD to allow signage along each street frontage would be in line with the city’sgeneral sign code and the treatment of similar properties.The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed PUD amendment.(A full breakdown and analysis of the requested amendment can be found in the attached staff report.)BACKGROUNDChanhassen Retail Center PUD:On October 26, 1992, the City Council gave final approval for the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD and Target project.The PUD stipulated that wall signage was limited to a maximum of two street frontages.On February 8, 2010, the City Council approved an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD that allowed forthe use of LED lights and adopted the Central Business District standards for the PUD’s setbacks, height, landscape, lotcover, and other standards not stipulated by the PUD.On December 6, 2017, sign permits were issued for revised signage along Target's south and west elevations. On December 28, 2017, a building permit was issued for an interior and exterior remodel of the Target store.On February 12, 2018, the City Council approved an off­sale intoxicating liquor license for Target. On September 4, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed PUD amendment.On September 10, 2018, the City Council discussed signage and Planned Unit Developments during the worksession.DISCUSSIONDuring the Public Hearing, local business owner Michael Clausen expressed his opposition to the proposedamendment. He noted that when he opened his business five years ago, he had expressed interest in having signagealong three sides of his building but had been told by city staff that it was only permitted along two sides. Heexpressed his understanding that City Code limits signage to two sides per building. He did not feel it was fair tochange the rules for Target, and felt they should be held to the same standard as every other business.Commissioner Madsen asked staff if they could address his comments. Staff replied that the city’s base sign ordinanceallows one sign per street frontage, but that different development’s PUDs and sign plans may restrict the number ofstreet frontages. Staff noted that eleven of the PUDs and sign plans surveyed limited their business to two streetfrontages, and that if the speaker’s business was located in one of those, he would have been informed that he wasonly allowed signage on two elevations.Chairman Aller asked for clarification as to the potential impact of the proposed amendment. Staff clarified that itwould allow all businesses within the PUD to one wall sign per street frontage, as provided for in the base sign code.Commissioner Madsen asked how many signs a business zoned Central Business District (CBD) is allowed if it is notin a PUD. Staff responded that they would be entitled to signage along each street frontage.The Commissioners expressed concern that businesses within the PUD and CBD all be treated fairly. They expressedinterest in keeping the PUD internally consistent and making sure that all businesses within it were governed by thesame provisions.Commissioner Madsen questioned the need for additional signage on Target.Chairman Aller expressed the opinion that the new liquor store was essentially a new service that may requireadditional advertising.Commissioner Tietz asked staff how this request related to the recently passed pick­ up/drive­up sign ordinance. Staffresponded that the pick­up/drive­up signs change was citywide and fell under the category of directional signage.Commissioner Undestad stated that retail is changing and that signage needs are changing with it. He expressed support for changing it at the PUD level. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development. The recommended amendment would allow businesses in the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development to have signage along each street frontage by removing the clause limiting each business to two street frontages. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report_Target PUD Amendment Chanhassen Retail Center PUD Ord as of Feb 8, 2010 Chanhassen Retail Center PUD Ord Amendment 2018­15 Findings of Fact (Approval) Findings of Fact (Denial) Development Review Application Chanhassen PUD Amendment Cover Letter Elevations Public Hearing Notice Documents CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: September 4, 2018 CC DATE: September 24, 2018 REVIEW DEADLINE: 10/2/2018 CASE #:2018-15 Chanhassen Retail Center PUD Amendment BY: MacKenzie Walters SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting that the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development be amended to allow signage along three street frontages. LOCATION: 851 W. 78th Street APPLICANT: Leila Bunge (Kimley-Horn & Associates) 2550 University Ave. W. 238N St. Paul, MN 55113 OWNER: Target Corporation PO Box 9456 Minneapolis, MN 55440 PRESENT ZONING: PUD 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial ACREAGE: 18.69 Acres DENSITY: N/A LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs and amendments to PUDs because the city is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” (Note: a motion for denial and appropriate findings of fact are also included at the end of the report.) Planning Commission Chanhassen Retail Center (Target) – Planning Case 2018-15 September 4, 2018 Page 2 of 5 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY Target is requesting an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permit signage along their building’s north façade at 851 W. 78th Street. The PUD currently limits signage to two street frontages and the building has existing signage along its western and southern frontages. Target recently added a liquor section to the northwest corner of their store as part of extensive interior and exterior renovations and feels that signage along the W. 78th Street frontage is need to provide visibility for the new liquor section. Other buildings within the PUD already have signage along three street frontages. In reviewing the requested PUD amendment, staff examined the general sign code that would govern the property in the absence of a PUD ordinance, other PUDs and sign plans within the city, and the existing signage within the PUD. Staff believes that the requested PUD amendment is in line with the city’s general sign code and the treatment of similar properties. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed PUD amendment. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Ordinance: Limits wall signs to two street frontages per business, and a maximum of 15 percent (15%) total wall area. Chapter 20, Article XXVI. – Signs: Limits wall signs in Central Business District (CBD) to one sign per street frontage per business, and provides a sliding scale for maximum display area. BACKGROUND Chanhassen Retail Center PUD: On October 26, 1992, the City Council gave final approval for the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD and Target Project. The PUD stipulated that wall signage was limited to a maximum of two street frontages. On February 8, 2010, the City Council approved an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD that allowed for the use of LED lights and adopted the Central Business District standards for the PUD’s setbacks, height, landscape, lot cover, and other standards not stipulated by the PUD. Relevant Sign Variances: 2003-05: Allowed Giant Panda to place signs on three building elevations, sign plan limited Highway 5 Centre to two elevations. 2017-03: Allowed Dominos to place sign on eastern façade, sign plan limited Colonial Square to southern façade. Planning Commission Chanhassen Retail Center (Target) – Planning Case 2018-15 September 4, 2018 Page 3 of 5 ANALYSIS In regulating signage the city attempts to balance the advertising needs of businesses with the potential visual nuisance/negative aesthetics that can be created by unrestricted signage. One of the main ways that the city does this is by limiting which elevations can display wall signage. The city’s general sign code allows businesses to display signage along each street frontage and allows signage on the entrance façade in cases where the individual entrance does not front a public street. The city also uses sign plans to further regulate the signage of planned centers and multi-tenant buildings. These sign plans often designate the location of the building’s sign bands and can limit the number and height of elevations where signage is permitted. PUDs often also have unique sign criteria that can specify which elevations are allowed to display signage, and often establish design and style criteria for the development. Staff conducted a survey of 29 PUD ordinances and sign plans in order to determine what the general trend for provisions regulating the maximum number of elevations were for these developments. Almost half of these developments allow businesses to display signs on each street elevation, with the next most common limit being a maximum of two elevations. Staff also found two instances in which variances were granted to allow businesses to display signage along a façade prohibited by their sign plan or development’s PUD. The Chanhassen Retail Center PUD limits each building’s wall signage to a maximum of two street frontages, but does not specify which frontages are allowed signage. As shown by the table to the left, the various buildings have signage facing all four potential directions and two of the PUD’s five buildings already have signage along three street frontages. The building shared by Noodles and Jersey Mike’s has signage along three frontages because the interpretation was made that each business was entitled to signage along two elevations. Staff believes that Perkins was allowed signage along three elevations due to a permitting error. In many cases where buildings are limited to specific number of elevations, the elevations are specified (i.e. signage is only permitted on north and south elevations). These specific restrictions tend to reflect the architectural design of the building or the nature of adjacent land uses. The intent is typically to prevent unnecessary signage, signage that will detract from the aesthetics of the building, or signage that will be highly visible to a residential neighborhood. The Chanhassen Retail Center PUD is not located near any residential neighborhoods and is surrounded by commercial and industrial uses. In this situation, the primary intent of the restriction is to prevent superfluous Survey of Number of Permitted Sign Frontages Frontages allowed 1 2 3 1 per street frontage Total PUD 0 3 1 9 13 Sign Plans 1 8 1 6 16 Combined 1 11 2 15 29 Chanhassen Retail Center Signage Business Frontages Target South and West Noodles and Company* South and East Jersey Mike's Subs* North and East Taco Bell North and East Leeann Chin North and South Perkins North, East, and West *Noodles and Jersey Mike’s share a building so their building has signage on three frontages. Planning Commission Chanhassen Retail Center (Target) – Planning Case 2018-15 September 4, 2018 Page 4 of 5 signage as some of the buildings have street frontages where additional signage would not increase the business’s visibility or would be redundant due to the presence of monument or pylon signs. During the development’s September 16, 1992 Planning Commission meeting, commissioners discussed concerns related to superfluous signage as it pertained to Target’s proposed pharmacy sign; ultimately, they decided to support the presence of the pharmacy sign on the Target building because it advertised a service not present at all Targets. As a separate issue, the Planning Commission also discussed the fact that the Target would be allowed signage along W. 78th Street under the general sign code, which was not being requested. One commissioner indicated that they felt signage along W. 78th Street might make the development “friendlier” and help break up the large expanse of wall; however, no action was taken on the comment as Target felt the proposed signage was sufficient. Target’s recent remodel has added a new liquor store section with a separate entrance in the northeast corner of the store. Since this is a new service not found in many Targets and which, due to the separate entrance, functions largely as a separate store, Target feels that additional signage is necessary to market the liquor store. Locating a sign near the intersection providing access to Target’s parking lot facing 78th Street West is the most effective location for the sign. Staff agrees that the proposed signage is not redundant and that its proposed location is not problematic. Target Proposed North Elevation Since multiple buildings within the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD already have signage along more than two elevations and signage within the development already faces north, south, east, and west, it would be appropriate to remove the existing provision restricting signage to a maximum of two street frontages. Amending the PUD to remove that provision would allow the PUD to be governed by the city’s general sign code’s restrictions limiting signage to elevations where a building has street frontage. ALTERNATIVES 1) Remove the provision limiting wall signage within the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to two street frontages. 2) Amend the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to limit signage to three street frontages. 3) Add a provision allowing Chanhassen Retail Center’s major tenant signage along three street frontages. 4) Retain Chanhassen Retail Center’s existing two street frontage limit. Planning Commission Chanhassen Retail Center (Target) – Planning Case 2018-15 September 4, 2018 Page 5 of 5 RECOMMENDATION Staff believes that Alternative 1 would provide for equal treatment for all businesses within the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD and would be consistent with the guidelines outlined within the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” Should the Planning Commission recommend denial of the proposed PUD amendment, it is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council deny the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15; and adopts of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” If adopted the amended portion of the Chanhassen Retail PUD would be amended as follows: 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than 2 street frontages. The total of all wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total area of the building wall upon which the signs are mounted ATTACHMENTS 1. Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Ordinance as of February 8, 2010 2. Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Ordinance Amendment 2018-15 3. Findings of Fact and Recommendation (Approval) 4. Findings of Fact and Recommendation (Denial) 5. Development Review Application 6. Chanhassen PUD Amendment Cover Letter 7. Elevations 8. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing G:\PLAN\2018 Planning Cases\18-15 Target PUD amendment\Staff Report_Target PUD Amendment.docx 1 CHANHASSEN RETAIL CENTER Approved 9/28/92 Amended 2/8/ 2010 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD commercial/retail zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each lot proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. The Central Business District regulations shall apply except as modified by this ordinance. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with the City’s CBD development goals. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to the whether or not a use meets the definition, the City Council shall make that interpretation. 1. Day Care Center 2. Standard Restaurants 3. Health and recreation clubs 4. Retail 5. Financial Institutions, including drive-in service * 6. Newspaper and small printing offices 7. Veterinary Clinic 8. Animal Hospital 9. Offices 10. Health Care Facility 11. Garden Center (completely enclosed) 12. Bars and Taverns 13. Fast Food Restaurants (Maximum of 2) * • Drive-thru’s should be buffered from all public views. c. Setbacks Per City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box USE Lot Area Bldg sq Ft. Parking Permitted Use 20,000 sq. ft. NA Per code 2 e. Building Materials and Design The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 1. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Masonry material shall be used. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted block. Painted surfaces shall be allowed on the Target Store only. 2. Brick may be used and must be approved to assure uniformity. 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. 4. Concrete may be poured in place, tilt-up or pre-cast, and shall be finished in stone, textured or coated. 5. Metal standing seam siding will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials or curtain wall on office components. 6. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 7. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by pitched roofs, except for the Target store shall have a parapet wall for screening. Wood screen fences are prohibited. Screening shall consist of compatible materials. 8. All outlots shall be designed with similar material and colors as Target. (Target will be the first store to build and they will establish or set the theme.) 10. All buildings on Outlot B shall have a pitched roof line. f. Site Landscaping and Screening In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 1. All open spaces and non-parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3 3. The master landscape plan for the Target PUD shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments. Each lot must present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan review process. 4. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 5. Outlot B shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. g. Signage One freestanding pylon sign shall be permitted for Target. This site is limited to a monument sign. 1. Each property shall be allowed one monument sign. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than 2 street frontages. The total of all wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the total area of the building wall upon which the signs are mounted. 3. All signs require a separate sign permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. This includes the freestanding wall and monument signs. Signs shall be an architecture feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. h. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high pressure sodium fixtures or LED. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination, shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. 4. Light poles shall be Corten, shoe box light standards. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. ----- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Standards, Section g. Signage, subsection 2 to read as follows: 2. The total of all wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total area of the building wall upon which the signs are mounted Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 24th day of September, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ___________, 2018) g:\plan\2018 planning cases\18-15 target pud amendment\chanhassen retail center ordinance amendment 2018-15.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of The City of Chanhassen to amend the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development. On September 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Target for a Planned Unit Development Amendment. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed application preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and recommended approval of the proposed amendment. On September 24, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the applicant of Target for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development District. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Commercial. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail Addition; Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail 2nd Addition; Lots 1-3, Chanhassen Retail 3rd Addition; Lots 1-2, Block 3, Burdick Park Addition; and, Lot 1, Block 1, Chanhassen Retail 4th Addition. 4. The proposed amendment to the PUD is consistent with the guidelines outlined within the comprehensive plan. 5. The planning report #2018-15, dated September 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters is incorporated herein. DECISION The Chanhassen City Council approves the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 24th day of September, 2018. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY:___________________________________ Denny Laufenburger, Mayor CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (DENIAL) IN RE: Application of The City of Chanhassen to amend the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development. On September 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Target for a Planned Unit Development Amendment. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed application preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and recommended approval of the proposed amendment. On September 24, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the applicant of Target for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development District. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Commercial. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail Addition; Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail 2nd Addition; Lots 1-3, Chanhassen Retail 3rd Addition; Lots 1-2, Block 3, Burdick Park Addition; and, Lot 1, Block 1, Chanhassen Retail 4th Addition. 4. The proposed amendment to the PUD is not consistent with the guidelines outlined within the comprehensive plan. 5. The planning report #2018-15, dated September 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters is incorporated herein. DECISION The Chanhassen City Council denies the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 24th day of September, 2018. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY:___________________________________ Denny Laufenburger, Mayor ?c Utt- ts I-n.^> COMMUNlTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division -7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147 , Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 CITY OT CIIAI.IHASSII'I APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW submittaroate:) 1,If<pc ort"tL'l-l !-L cc Date:1a:Ll-IL 60-Day ReviewDate:tollil* (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submiftal information that must accompany this application) trtr tr tr Comprehensive Plan Amendment ..... $600 ! Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) fl Single-Family Residence ................................ $325 E All Others......... ........ $425 lnterim Use Permit (lUP) ! ln conjunction with Single-Family Residence.. $325fl All others......... ........ $425 Rezoning (REZ) fl Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 EI Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 fl All others......... ........ $500 Sign Plan Review........ ...$150 Site Plan Review (SPR) E Administrative.......... .................... $100 E Commercial/lndustrial Districts* .. $500 Plus $10 per 1 ,000 square feet of building area:(_ thousand square feet) "lnclude number of g1g{149 employees:.lnclude number of ryemployees:E Residential Districts. .................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) Subdivision (SUB) E Create 3 lots or less ............. ....... $300! Create over 3 |ots.......................$600 + $15 per lot( lots)E Metes & Bounds (2lots) ..............$300 E Consolidate 1ots....... ...................$150 ! Lot Line Adjustment............... ......$150I rina|P1at.............. ....$700 (lncludes $450 escrow for attorney costs)* "Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) .. .. $200 Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) E Single-family Residence............................... $1 50 fl Ail others......... ......$2Zs Zoning Appeal........ ...... $100 Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. u tr tr tr tr tr tr h x tr Property Owners' List within 500' (city to generate after pre-apptication meeting) ............:....... ...... $3 per address ( I l. addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)... $50 per document E Site Plan Agreement E Wetland Alteration Permit E Conditional Use Permit E lnterim Use Permit ! Vacation E Variance E Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) fl Easements ( easements)BrTl"E:+3:r,,.oo Description of Proposal: Adding a "Wine & Spirits" sign to the north side of the Target building 851 W 78th St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 qq lziF-t.1- [l*r^- Property Address or Location: Parcel#: 2518400'10 Legal Description:LOT 1 EXC: That part of Lot '1, Block 1, Chanhassen Retail Addition TotalAcreage:10.06 Wetlands Present? ! Yes Z ruo Present Zoning:Central Business District (CBD)Requested Zoning: Central Business District (CBD) Present Land Use Designation: Commercial Requested Land Use Designation:Commercial Existing Use of Property: Retail ECheck box if separate narrative is attached. Section 1:allthat Section 2: Reouired lnformation APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. lf this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name:Leila Bunge (Kimley-Horn & Associates)Contact: Leila Bunge Address:2550 University Ave W, 238N Phone:(763) 251-1015 St. Paul, MN 55113 Cell: Fax: Date:7131118 PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name:Eames Gilmore Contact: Eames Gilmore Address:50 South 1Oth Street #400, TP3-1 1 140 Phone: Cell: (612) 761-1585 City/State/Zip:Minneapolis, MN 55403 Email:Fax: Signature:Date:7t31t18 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name:Contact: Phone:Address: City/State/Zip: Email: Cell: Fax: leila.bunge@kimley-horn.com Who should receive copies of staff reports?*Other Contact I nformation : Name:Via: Via: Via: Via: trZtrtr Property Owner Applicant Engineer Other" fl Email E Email E Email E Email E trlaiteO Paper Copy f] ttlaiteo Paper Copy ! lvtaiteO Paper Copy E naaieo Paper Copy Address: City/State/Zip: Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. Section 3:Owner and lnformation City/State/Zip: Email: Signature: Section 4: Notification lnformation kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 July 31, 2018 City of Chanhassen Department of Planning and Zoning 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Target (T-0862) Target PUD Amendment 851 W 78th St Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Walters, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. serves as the engineering consultant for Target, who is seeking a PUD amendment of the Chanhassen Retail Center for the building at 851 W 78th Street, Chanhassen, MN. The PUD amendment is being submitted to include a “Wine & Spirits” sign as a permitted exterior wall sign on the north side of the building. Target has recently remodeled the Chanhassen store with façade and signage improvements, which included a new liquor section. Since Target completed the liquor section, they have found that the current signage is not advertising the service very well to customers. The addition of the “Wine & Spirits” sign on the north elevation will provide more visibility to the store and new liquor section from 78th Street, which is the main street facing the store. We respectfully request to be on your next Planning Commission agenda. Thank you for your time and comments on the initial submittal. If you have any more questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at 763-251-1015 or Leila.bunge@kimley-horn.com. Sincerely, Leila Bunge Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Phone: 763-251-1015 Email: Leila.bunge@kimley-horn.com Attachments: 1 – Development Review Application 2 – Elevations (Proposed Front vs. Existing Front) 3 – Property Deed (IITVOf,. CHANEASSEN t-n'nvpn emNNEPTN COUNTIES NOTICE OT PUBLIC HEARING ""ffitS,to#*I3"'31*'fithat the Chanhassen Plannrng i:iil"iiissio" will hotd a Public ilJi"i-i-g o" t"esday, September a:frrg it t'Jo P.m. iir'the council dfiilG;s i" Chanhassen CitY ffii:'it-o-o Market BIvd' The ""itios. of this hearing is to I"'"ii-aei an amendment to the iiffi ui-u"it oevelopment (PUD) iriTiieet to allow adding- a^.iit t6in" north side of the ;;:iilft ;i the property located ^iGi {f"ii1aut'Str6et and zoned Fi;;";d unit DeveloPm-ent ?P-uoi. ePPticant: Kimley'Horn Ina-A-tJoiirt"s, owner: Target Corporation. . 1r-- r^^^]i^6 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent ofthe publisher ofthe newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge ofthe facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requiremen-ts constituting_qualification as a legal ne'fuspaper, as piovioed by Minn-esota statute 331A.02,331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identifie a asNo. ? [' )-) ivas putiistreO on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated. in the attached Noticd and sdid Notiie is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. SaiO notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper -specifirld. Printedbelow is a copy of the lower cas9 alphabetfrom A to Z, both inclusive, aird ishereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: 'iolrn-it owing the location ttri-oroposal ls availableor fi;;;;p"iai-is available iot iirUti. r-eview.on !hg-t-tl{t abcdefghij klmnopqrstuvwxyz Subscribed and swom before me on JYMME JEANNETTE BAHK NOTABY PUBLIC . MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01I31/23 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classifled rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... S31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter... ...... $3 1.20 per column inch Rate actually charged forthe above matter... $12.97 per column inch ief's ite-at www.ci.chanhaqsin' ffii;J;o'ig:is ;; qi citv Hallmn.us/2018-15 or at CIIY trau duiine regutar business Jro-urslilffit".i.a P""-*s are invited io attend this Public hearrn-gi"-iiTii,a -ttrft Public hearing ,irJ Lirii"tJ ttt"ir opinions withand exPress respecfto t]ris"Jcfto tnis proYisat. fu aixenzie Watters, Assistant Planner Email: mwalters(4 ci.chanhassen'mn'us P}ilofue, 932-227'L132 (Published in the Chanhassen Viuigeion Thursday August 23' 2018: No.4623)