PC Staff Report 12-4-18PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
REPORT
Tuesday, December 4, 2018
Subject Consider Variance to Build an Accessory Building (Garage) at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane
Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: C.1.
Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 201820
PROPOSED MOTION:
The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13foot front yard setback and a 4foot shoreland
setback variance, subject to the conditions of approval; and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a 1,000 squarefoot detached garage on a currently vacant parcel
(PID 25.1700010). The proposed detached garage would encroach 13 feet into the front yard setback and 4 feet into
the shoreland setback. In order to facilitate the construction of the proposed detached garage, the applicant would
combine the parcel with his other property at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane. Combining these parcels would remove the
possibility of a new singlefamily house being constructed on the vacant lot.
APPLICANT
Richard Morris (Owner)
SITE INFORMATION
PRESENT ZONING: Single Family Residential District RSF
LAND USE:Residential Low Density
ACREAGE: .48 acres
DENSITY: NA
APPLICATION REGULATIONS
Chapter 1, General Provisions
Section 12. Rules of Construction and Definitions
Chapter 20, Article II. Division 3, Variances
Chapter 20, Article VI. Wetland Protection
Chapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District
Chapter 20, Article XII. “RSF” SingleFamily Residential District
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, December 4, 2018SubjectConsider Variance to Build an Accessory Building (Garage) at 3790 Lone Cedar LaneSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: C.1.Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 201820PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13foot front yard setback and a 4foot shorelandsetback variance, subject to the conditions of approval; and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThe applicant is requesting a variance to construct a 1,000 squarefoot detached garage on a currently vacant parcel(PID 25.1700010). The proposed detached garage would encroach 13 feet into the front yard setback and 4 feet intothe shoreland setback. In order to facilitate the construction of the proposed detached garage, the applicant wouldcombine the parcel with his other property at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane. Combining these parcels would remove thepossibility of a new singlefamily house being constructed on the vacant lot.APPLICANTRichard Morris (Owner)SITE INFORMATIONPRESENT ZONING: Single Family Residential District RSFLAND USE:Residential Low DensityACREAGE: .48 acres DENSITY: NA APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 1, General ProvisionsSection 12. Rules of Construction and DefinitionsChapter 20, Article II. Division 3, VariancesChapter 20, Article VI. Wetland Protection
Chapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District
Chapter 20, Article XII. “RSF” SingleFamily Residential District
Section 20615. Lot Requirements and Setbacks
Chapter 20, Article XXIII. “General Supplemental" Regulations
Section 20904. Accessory Structures
BACKGROUND
In July 2018, PID 25.1700010 was placed on the market. City staff received numerous inquiries as to the possibility of
constructing a singlefamily home on the parcel. As the parcel is a lot of record, staff responded that a home could
likely be constructed, but cautioned that multiple variances would be needed due to the presence of wetlands along the
property’s northern edge.
On September 28, 2018, the applicant purchased this parcel along with the adjacent home at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane.
The applicant subsequently approached city staff to discuss the possibility of constructing a detached garage on the
parcel. Staff indicated that this would require a variance and the consolidation of the two parcels.
RECOMMENDATION
The applicant’s proposal to combine PID 25.700010, the vacant parcel, with PID 25.1700020, 3790 Lone Cedar Lane,
and construct a detached garage represents a significantly less intensive use of PID 25.700010 than the construction of new
singlefamily home. Additionally, the applicant’s proposed placement of the detached garage maximizes its distance from
both Lake Minnewashta and the property’s wetland and minimizes the length of the driveway needed to access the garage.
Since the proposed garage is located at the end of a street with no neighboring homes to the north, east, or south, reducing
the front yard setback will not negatively affect the neighbor’s viewscape. Staff recommends approval of the proposed
variances with conditions.
A full breakdown and analysis of the variance request can be found in the attached staff report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff Report
Findings of Fact and Decision Approval
Findings of Fact and Decision Denial
Variance Document
Development Review Application
Letter from Applicant
Surveys
Letter from Lester Buildings
ERS Memo
Affidavit of Mailing
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PC DATE: December 4, 2018
CC DATE: January 14, 2019
REVIEW DEADLINE: January 1, 2019
CASE #: 2018-20
BY: MW
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a 1,000 square foot detached garage on a
currently vacant parcel (PID 251700010). The proposed detached garage would encroach 13 feet
into the front yard setback and 4 feet into the shoreland setback. In order to facilitate the
construction of the proposed detached garage, the applicant would combine the parcel with his
other property at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane. Combining these parcels would remove the possibility
of a new single-family house being constructed on the vacant lot.
LOCATION: PID 251700010
OWNER: Richard Morris
3790 Lone Cedar Lane
Chaska, MN 55318
PRESENT ZONING: RSF
2030 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low
Density
ACREAGE: .48 acres DENSITY: NA
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN
DECISION-MAKING:
The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed
project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The city has a relatively high
level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established
standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
PROPOSED MOTION:
“The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13-foot front yard setback and a
4-foot shoreland setback variance, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached
Findings of Fact and Decision.”
(Note: A motion for denial and appropriate findings of fact are also included at the end of the
report.)
3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request
December 4, 2018
Page 2
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The applicant owns a home located at
3790 Lone Cedar Lane and an
adjacent undeveloped parcel of land
with PID 27500010. The vacant
parcel is a lot of record and the city is
required to allow the applicant
reasonable use of the property. Since
the parcel is zoned Single Family
Residential District (RSF), reasonable
use could be a single-family home;
however, the applicant is instead
proposing to construct a 1,000 square
foot detached garage on the site.
Due to the configuration of the lot of
record and the presence of a wetland classified as preserve along the northern property line, the
applicant is requesting a 4-foot shoreland setback and 13-foot front yard setback variance to
accommodate the proposed garage. This placement would maximize the structure’s distance
from Lake Minnewashta and the wetland, and would minimize the size of the driveway required
to service the garage, resulting in reduced impervious cover within the shoreland district.
Since the City Code does not allow the construction of accessory structures without a primary
structure, the applicant has agreed to combine the two parcels if the requested variance is
approved. The applicant is also requesting that the city vacate the unused drainage and utilities
easement located between the two parcels to accommodate the structure’s proposed placement.
Combining the parcels would permanently remove the potential for a new single-family home to
be constructed on the vacant parcel.
The applicant has noted that other uses for the parcel, such as a new single-family home, would
result in significantly larger impacts on Lake Minnewashta and the property’s wetlands. Of
particular note are the increased amount of impervious surface that would be required to build a
house on the parcel, the dock and associated vegetative removal rights that the new homeowner
would enjoy, and generally increased intensity of use. Staff agrees with the applicant’s
assessment that their proposed use of the property is significantly less impactful on the lake and
wetland than a new single-family home.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 1, General Provisions
Section 1-2. Rules of Construction and Definitions
Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances
Chapter 20, Article VI. Wetland Protection
3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request
December 4, 2018
Page 3
Chapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District
Chapter 20, Article XII. “RSF” Single Family Residential District
Section 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks.
Chapter 20, Article XXIII. “General Supplemental Regulations
Section 20-904. Accessory structures
BACKGROUND
In July 2018, PID 251700010 was placed on the market. City staff received numerous inquiries
as to the possibility of constructing a single-family home on the parcel. As the parcel is a lot of
record, staff responded that a home could likely be constructed, but cautioned that multiple
variances would be needed due to the presence of wetlands along the property’s northern edge.
On September 28, 2018, the applicant purchased this parcel along with the adjacent home at
3790 Lone Cedar Lane. The applicant subsequently approached city staff to discuss the
possibility of constructing a detached garage on the parcel. Staff indicated that this would require
a variance and the consolidation of the two parcels.
SITE CONDITIONS
The property is zoned Single Family Residential District, is located within the city’s Shoreland
Management District, and has a wetland classified as preserve which runs along the northern lot
line. This zoning district requires lots to be a minimum of 20,000 square feet, have front yard
setbacks of 30 feet, setbacks of 75 feet from the lake’s ordinary high water level, side yard
setbacks of 10 feet, and limits parcels to a maximum of 25 percent lot coverage. Houses are
limited to 35 feet in height and detached accessory structures are limited to 20 feet in height. The
property must also have a 40-foot buffer from the edge of the wetland, principal structures must
be setback 40 feet from the edge of the buffer, and accessory structures must be setback 20 feet
from the edge of the buffer.
The lot is 15,135 square feet and is
currently undeveloped; however, the
applicant also owns the neighboring parcel
at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane, which has a
single-family home built in 1981. This
parcel is approximately 37,026 square feet
and has an estimated 6,508 square feet of
lot cover resulting in 17.6 percent lot cover.
This home appears to have a non-
conforming wetland setback of 75.5 feet,
but meets all other standards established by
its zoning district and applicable City Code.
3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request
December 4, 2018
Page 4
NEIGHBORHOOD
Cedar Crest
The plat for this area was recorded in January of 1962. This plat and its lots predate the City of
Chanhassen, its zoning codes, the shoreland management district, and the wetland protection
ordinance. Additional subdivisions of the Cedar Crest plat subsequently took place between late
1975 and 1978 creating the Trolls-Glen development, and further subdivisions in 1987 and 2007
split up several of the larger lots along Lake Minnewashta. Changes to Highway 5 led to the city
vacating the portion of Cedar Crest Court’s, also known as Lone Cedar Lane, right of way in
favor of a private street serving Cedar Crest’s eastern parcels. Houses in the area vary
significantly in age and scale, and many of the older homes have non-conforming elements or
variances.
Variances on Lone Cedar:
78-10 3895 Lone Cedar Circle: Approved - 18.5’ front yard setback (house)
82-11 3892 Lone Cedar Lane: Approved - 11.23’ front yard setback (house)
87-05 3900 Lone Cedar Lane: Approved - 5’ rear yard (enclosed deck)
02-13 3840 Lone Cedar Lane: Approved - 10’ bluff setback (retaining wall)
07-07 Gauer Addition: Approved - Access off of private street (2 lot subdivision)
14-20 3880 Lone Cedar Lane: Approved - 13’ bluff setback (water oriented accessory structure)
15-20 3892 Lone Cedar Lane: Approved - 25’ shoreland setback (retaining wall)
ANALYSIS
Lot Combination and Vacation
The City Code does not allow for the construction of an accessory
structure on a lot that does not have a principal structure. Additionally,
the properties in question each have a 10-foot drainage and utility
easement on their respective sides of their shared interior lot line. The
City Code does not permit accessory structures like detached garages
to be located within a drainage and utility easement, and requires these
structures to meet a required 10-foot side yard setback.
The applicant proposes to address these issues by combining the two
parcels and requesting that the city vacate the drainage and utility
3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request
December 4, 2018
Page 5
easement. Combining the two lots would allow for the construction of accessory structures since the
house on 3790 Lone Cedar Lane would be the principal structure. It would also remove the interior
lot line and its associated side yard setback.
The Engineering Department is currently processing the applicant’s request to vacate the drainage
and utilities easement; however, the easement is not currently being used by the city and, once the
lots are combined, there will be no anticipated need for the city to retain the easement. Vacation of
the easement is a separate process that is currently scheduled for a public hearing before the City
Council on January 28, 2019. If the City Council votes to approve the vacation, recording of the
vacation and lot combination would occur concurrently.
In addition to allowing for the proposed placement of the detached garage, combining the parcels
would remove the potential for a new single-family home to be built on PID 251700010. Since PID
251700010 is a lot of record and zoned Residential Single Family (RSF) District, the city could be
required to accommodate a single-family home as a “reasonable use” of the property. Due to the
city’s minimum standards for single-family homes, any single-family home would involve the
creation of significantly more impervious surface and greater encroachment into the lot’s shoreland
and wetland setbacks. A single-family residence would also have the right to install a dock and
conducted associated wetland alteration on the property.
Once the parcels are combined, they would not be eligible for future subdivision since the lake and
wetland setbacks would preclude the creation of two lots meeting the subdivision ordinance’s
minimum standards.
For the above reasons, staff supports the proposed lot
combination and requested vacation.
Front Yard and Shoreland Setback
PID 251700010 has a roughly triangular shape. Approximately
the eastern one third of the triangle is covered by a wetland with
a combined buffer and accessory structure setback of 60 feet.
The wetland also runs the length of the triangle’s hypotenuse,
but in this case, the lake’s 75-foot shoreland setback is the most
restrictive. At its deepest point, the lot measures approximately
135 feet from the front lot line
to Lake Minnewashta’s
ordinary high water line.
Between the property’s
shoreland and front yard
setback, which require a
combined 105 feet of
setbacks, only a small triangle
of the property is buildable.
3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request
December 4, 2018
Page 6
The applicant initially proposed placing the garage in this location that met the ordinance’s front
yard setback; however, in order to meet the front yard setback the proposed structure would require
a 23-foot shoreland and an 8-foot wetland setback variance. Staff requested that the applicant
propose an alternate location that maximized the property’s distance from the lake and wetland by
encroaching upon the front yard setback. Given the high quality of the property’s wetland and the
importance of protecting Lake Minnewashta, staff believes that every step should be taken to
maximize the distance between the structure and the lake and wetland.
The applicant subsequently proposed a location that would require a 13-foot front yard setback,
reduces the required shoreland setback variance to four feet, and removes the need for a wetland
setback variance. The triangular shape of the lot means that only the northeast corner of the garage
will actually be located within the 75-foot shoreland setback. Due to the property’s location at the
end of a dead-end street with no residential properties facing it, many of the concerns involving
viewscape and neighborhood character that typically apply to variance requests for reduced front
yard setbacks do not apply. Since the property already has a large driveway and the garage will be
accessed from east side rather than the southern facing elevation, there are no concerns about the
distance between the structure and street being adequate to provide off-street parking spaces.
Finally, Highway 5 has a large enough right of way that distance between the front property line and
curb is over 45 feet, rather than the 10 to 15 feet that is typical for residential properties.
For the above reasons, staff supports the requested front yard and shoreland variances.
Impact on Neighborhood
The vacant lot is bordered by Lake Minnewashta to the north and east, Highway 5 and the
Minnesota Landscape Arboretum to the south, and the applicant’s home to the west. The applicant’s
proposed detached garage is larger than other accessory structures found within the neighborhood;
however, its size does not exceed the district’s 1,000 square foot maximum size. Additionally, the
proposed accessory structure has a smaller footprint and lower maximum height than an alternative
use, such as a new single-family home, and will not generate additional traffic or lake use. Due to its
relative isolation from other residential structures, the proposed variance is not expected to
significantly affect the surrounding property
owners.
SUMMARY
3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request
December 4, 2018
Page 7
The applicant’s proposal to combine PID 25700010, the vacant parcel, with PID 251700020, 3790
Lone Cedar Lane, and construct a detached garage represents a significantly less intensive use of
PID 2570010 than the construction of new single-family home. Additionally, the applicant’s
proposed placement of the detached garage maximizes its distance from both Lake Minnewashta
and the property’s wetland and minimizes the length of the driveway needed to access the garage.
Since the proposed garage is located at the end of a street with no neighboring homes to the north,
east, or south, reducing the front yard setback will not negatively affect the neighbors’ viewscape.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed variances with conditions.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a 13-foot front yard setback and a 4-
foot shoreland setback variance, subject to the conditions of approval and adopt the attached
Findings of Fact and Decision:
1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit.
2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined.
3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID
251700020 must be vacated.
4. The applicant shall include all trees 6” dbh and larger within the construction limits
for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be
protected during construction.
Should the Planning Commission decide to deny the variance request, it is recommended that the
Planning Commission adopt the following motion and attached Finding of Fact and Decision:
“The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the request for a 13-foot front yard
setback and a 4-foot shoreland setback variance and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and
Decisions.”
ATTACHMENTS
1. Finding of Fact and Decision Approval
2. Finding of Fact and Decision Denial
3. Variance Document
4. Development Review Application
5. Letter From Applicant
6. Surveys
7. Letter from Lester Buildings
8. ERS Memo on 3790 Lone Cedar Lane
9. Public Hearing Notice Mailing List
G:\PLAN\2018 Planning Cases\18-20 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Sub Var\Staff Report-3790 Lone Cedar Ln_PC.doc
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
(APPROVAL)
IN RE:
The application of Richard Morris for the construction of a detached garage on a property zoned
Single Family Residential District (RSF) – Planning Case 2018-20.
On December 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals
and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The
Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by
published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF).
2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density.
3. The legal description of the property is:
Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest
4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the
granting of a variance:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
Finding: The intent of the city’s shoreland and wetland ordinances is to minimize the
impact of development upon the city’s water resources. The applicant’s proposal to
combine the undeveloped lot of record with a parcel that has an existing single-family
home will remove the potential for a new single-family home to be constructed on the
vacant lot. A new single-family home would entail the creation of significantly more
impervious surface and require a larger shoreland setback variance than the proposed use,
as well as a wetland setback variance that the proposed use does not require. Granting the
requested shoreland variance to accommodate the construction of a detached garage that
will result in the less intensive use of a riparian lot is in harmony with the intent of this
Chapter.
2
The intent of the city’s required front yard setback is to ensure adequate driveway length
to accommodate off street parking, and to create a uniform aesthetic within residential
areas by ensuring the presence of a minimum amount of front yard greenspace. In this
instance, the parcel in question has an existing driveway that provides adequate off-street
parking and is located at the end of a dead-end with no potential to negatively impact the
neighbors’ viewscape. Furthermore, the requested reduction in the front yard setback will
reduce the need for a wetland setback variance and will significantly reduce the size of
the requested shoreland setback variance. In this case, increasing the structure’s distance
from the lake is more important than increasing its distance from the public right of way.
For the above reasons, the requested front yard setback variance is in harmony with the
intent of this Chapter.
b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property
owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter.
Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems.
Finding: The shoreland, wetland, and front yard setbacks leave the parcel with a very
constrained triangular building area, and relief from one or more setbacks would be
required for most potential uses of the property. The applicant’s proposed use of the
parcel to accommodate an accessory structure is reasonable and is significantly less
intensive than other potential reasonable uses for the property, i.e. a single-family home,
and requires significantly smaller variances.
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations.
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by
the landowner.
Finding: The property is a lot of a record and was platted before the city’s zoning,
wetland, and shoreland ordinances were adopted. The lot does not meet current standards
and the non-conforming nature of the lot has created the restricted buildable area that
necessitates the requested variances.
e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Finding: The size and scale of the proposed detached garage is permitted by the
property’s zoning district. Additionally, the location of the parcel at the end of a dead-end
street on the far side of the property from the only neighboring residence means that
granting the requested variance should not have any impact on the essential character of
the neighborhood.
3
f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota
Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter.
Finding: This does not apply to this request.
5. The planning report #2018-20, dated December 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, is
incorporated herein.
DECISION
“The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13-foot front yard
setback and a 4-foot shoreland setback variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit.
2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined.
3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID
251700020 must be vacated.
4. The applicant shall include all trees 6” dbh and larger within the construction limits
for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be
protected during construction.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4th day of December, 2018.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
Chairman
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
(DENIAL)
IN RE:
The application of Richard Morris for the construction of a detached garage on a property zoned
Single Family Residential District (RSF) – Planning Case 2018-20.
On December 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals
and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The
Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by
published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF).
2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density.
3. The legal description of the property is:
Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest
4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the
granting of a variance:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
Finding: The intent of the city’s shoreland management district is to limit the placement
of structures near recreational development lakes, in order to prevent the creation of
impervious surfaces near water resources and preserve the view of the shoreline for lake
users. Granting a variance to allow for the construction of a large detached garage within
the lake setback would not be in harmony with the intent of this Chapter.
Similarly, the city’s front yard setback is designed to create a uniform viewscape within
residential areas by ensuring the presence of a minimum amount of front yard greenspace
and requiring accessory structures to be built at or behind the front most point of the
primary structure. Allowing a detached garage to be built with a front yard setback
significantly less than that of the primary structure would not be in line with the intent of
this Chapter.
b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property
owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter.
2
Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems.
Finding: The applicant’s home has an existing two-car garage, and, if the two parcels are
combined, there are locations on the property where a smaller detached garage could be
constructed without the need for a variance. The inability of a parcel zoned RSF to
accommodate the maximum sized accessory structure permitted by the City Code is not a
practical difficulty.
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations.
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by
the landowner.
Finding: The property is a lot of a record and was platted before the city’s zoning,
wetland, and shoreland ordinances were adopted. The lot does not meet current standards
and the non-conforming nature of the lot has created the restricted buildable area that
necessitates the requested variances.
e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Finding: No other property in the area has a 1,000 square foot accessory structure. The
prevailing development pattern is for properties to have a home with an attached garage
and a relatively small shed or water-oriented structure. Granting a variance to allow the
construction of a large pole barn type structure would alter the essential character of the
neighborhood.
f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota
Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter.
Finding: This does not apply to this request.
5. The planning report #2018-20, dated December 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, is
incorporated herein.
DECISION
“The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the request for a 13-foot
front yard setback and a 4-foot shoreland setback variance.”
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4th day of December, 2018.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
Chairman
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA
VARIANCE 2018-20
1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby
grants the following variance:
The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13-foot front yard
setback and a 4-foot shoreland setback variance.
2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County,
Minnesota, and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest.
3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit.
2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined.
3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID
251700020 must be vacated.
4. The applicant shall include all trees 6” dbh and larger within the construction limits
for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be
protected during construction.
4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not
been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse.
2
Dated: December 4, 2018 CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
(SEAL) Denny Laufenburger, Mayor
AND:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
(ss
COUNTY OF CARVER )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2018 by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen,
a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted
by its City Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
.}ct ?- )D
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard
Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317
Phone: (952)227-1300 / Fax: (952)227-1110
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Submiftal o"t",lIl ;r t t (PC Date: P l{ l' tX cc Date:
CITY OT CHAI.IIIASSII*I
60-Day Review Date:
(Refer to the appropriate Application Checktist for required submittat information that must accompany this application)
tr
n
tr
Comprehensive Plan Amendment $600 f] Subdivision (SUB)
n Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers......$100 E Create 3lots or less
E Create over 3 lots ...
Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
E Single-Family Residence.,n Rttothers
lnterim Use Permit (lUP)
E ntothers....
n Rezoning (REZ)
n Sign Plan Review
E Site Plan Review (SPR)
......$325
............$425
trtrtrtr
(_ tots)
Metes & Bounds (2lots)
Consolidate Lots ............
Lot Line Adjustment.
Final Plat....
..$300
$6OO + $15 per lot
...$300
...$150
'..$150
.'.$700
........ ......$150
.............' $275
... . ...'..'..$100
.............. $500
n tn conjunction with Single-Family Residence (lncludes $450 escrow for attorney costs)*
"Additional escrow may be required for other applications
through the development contract.
Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC). . ...$300
(Additional recording fees may apply)
Variance (VAR) ..............$200
Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP)
I Single-Family Residence......
E ntothers
I Zoning Appeal
I Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)
$200
$32s
$425
E Planned Unit Development (PUD)......... .. ....$750
E Minor Amendment to existing PUD.................$100
E rutothers ....... . .....$500
'E
"E[
tr............$150
I Administrative ..........$100
E C;;;i.i,rrrno,.i,i;iDi;i;i;i;; ... .'$5oo
Plus $10 per 1 ,000 square feet of building area:
(- thousand square feet)
*lnclude number of existing.employees:*lnclude number of ry emPloYees:
E Residential Districts ..$500
Plus $5 per dwelling unit (- units)
p[!: When multiple applications are processed concurrently,
th- appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
..$3 per address
-lJ
.,8
.N
Description of Proposal: fitttcD 4P AcC.ASorz-f /$t-tt t-Dril 6 (arw.a66) oN La'z'
37 70 LoN{ kD*L l*Ns ct*sr* ,MN ST3lgProperty Address or Location:
Parcel #: 2{17 ot:t> t or}o Legal Description:
TotalAcreage: /. 33 Wetlands Present? fives n Uo
Etoc-i1 / ce>,+tt Cr?€sT
lPr 2 BLo cl<
Requested Zoning fte5'
Requested Land Use Designation' S a 6t Cb'qAtdPresent Zoning: fZ€S
Present Land Use Designation: S L Pe** br
Existing Use of Property: StfGLr" Fn'+rtc
E[ Cnecf box if separate narrative is attached.
oN PTb i2r/7afl eo,
vAc*.,,or Lof FzD zrtzoe:siO fo fec€tt/{
ffitz*.i€ ff727L cD^) SoL( D*r7oN sf Lo79 .
Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)
E Conditional Use Permit f] lnterim Use Permit
fl Vacation l-I Variance
Ei frl"t". & Bounds Subdivision (2 deeds) E Easements (- easements)
....$50 Per document
E Site Plan Agreement
fl Wetland Alteration Permit
n Deeds
TOTAL FEE:
Section 2: Required lnformation
AppLtcANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as applicant, represent to have obtained
authorization from the property owner to file this application. iagree to be bound by conditions of approval, sub.iect only to
ine rrght to onject at the hearings on the application or during thL appeal period. lf this applicatioi has not been signed by
in" piop"rty o*n"r, I have atta6hed separaie documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application
.noltO'0" [rocessed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this
il;ti";f;": I ;i1 k";f myself informed of the deadiines for submiision of material and the progress of this application. I
further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to
any autnorization to proceed with the study. I certift that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Address:
Contact:
Phone:
City/State/Zip:
Email:
Cell:
Fax:
Signature:
pROpERTy OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do,
authorize the filing of this afplicition. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those
ionaition", subleit only to ihe right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods..l will keep myself informed of
the deadlines for submission of
-material and the progresJof this application. I further understand that additional fees may
i"
"11iig"a
io;.
"onsulting
fees, feasibility studies, eti. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the
study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct
Contact:/OcZ 4n415-
adaress: 3'770 /.:p e' Q=-o*a- L+z"te'
city/state/zip: q/4r(4, tlil s3'3/8 g.n bs-t-ad/- //{6/- /{6,
Email: PfcKb4 Fax:
PROJECT ENGINEER (if aPPlicable)
Contact:
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all
intormliion and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before flling this application, refer to the
ippropriate eppiication ihecklisi and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and
applicable procedural requirements.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 1 5 business days of application submittal. A
writien notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
trtrtrtr
Who should receive copies of staff reports?
Property Owner
Applicant
Engineer
Other*
copy to the city for processing.
*Other Contact Information:
Via: E Email E tr,tailed Paper CoPY
via: E Email I Maited Paper Copy
via: E Email E Maiteo Paper copy
via: E Emait ! uaited Paper CoPy
Name:
Address:
Cityistate/Zip:
Email:
INSTRUCTTONS TO APPLTCANT: Complete all necessary.form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your
device. PRINT FORM and delivEito city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital
6s-t-e6/- /?67
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Richard D Morris
3790 Lone Cedar Lane, Chaska, MN 55318
(City of Chanhassen)
651-261-4469 rickdm@uwalumni.com
11/2/2018
Mr. Bob Generous & City Planning Commission
City of Chanhassen
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Mr. Generous & City Planning Commission,
On 9/28/2018, I purchased a home at 3750 Arboretum Blvd. within the city limits of Chanhassen. The
City and I have since changed the address to 3790 Lone Cedar Lane to match the neighbors and facilitate
emergency response and postal services.
Two lots of record were in included in the sale. There is a 1981 single family home on PID 25700020.
There is a vacant lot adjacent with PID 25700010. Both are on Lake Minnewashta’s south side.
A variance from the 100’ wetland setback is requested from the city to allow the building of a 26’ x 38.5’
garage accessory building on the vacant lot. I’ve met with Mr. Bob Generous and Ms. Vanessa Strong
regarding the project. Both the City Building Department and Water Resources staff support an
accessory building as the optimal usage for this lot versus the alternative of another single-family home.
As an official lot of record, a case could be made to build a house on this lot as an alternative to the
accessory building proposal.
To be a good steward of the lake and water resources, I will consolidate the two lots into one
contingent upon approval of the variance, and thereby permanently remove the potential for another
single-family home. I am requesting vacation of the drainage and utility easement. The City Engineer
confirmed the easement is not used. Recording of the vacation will occur concurrently with the
recording of the variance and consolidation of the lots.
If another single-family home was built, it would result in more impact to the wetland and lake with
another dock, erosion from usage, and riparian owner weed removal rights of 2500 square feet plus a
15’ path of weed removal to clear water. Another house would also impact a city fire hydrant, the
access road, and a drainage ditch. Lot 1 is zoned for a single-family home and a hardship of usage exists
from the lot shape and lack of buildable space.
Mr. Generous and City staff support waiving the 30’ frontage setback to the proposed 17’ setback to
provide more spacing from the lake OHW mark. Instead of the 75’ setback from the OHW mark, the
proposed location is 71.8’ for one corner as shown on the Site Plan. 99% of the building area satisfies
the 75’ lake setback and City Code Section 20-481. The previous (and currently website ordinance
posted) OHW mark was 944.5’, but it was recently changed to 945.9’.
Your consideration and approval of this variance request for an accessory building with the condition of
lot consolidation is appreciated. As noted above, this plan is supported by Water Resources and City
Building Dept. staff.
Respectfully submitted,
Rick Morris
ffisqxm
October 16,2018
Rick Morris
3790Lone Cedar Lane
Chaska, MN 55318
Day Phone: 651 -261 -4469
Dear Rick Morris,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with a quotation for a Lester Uni-Frame Embedded building. For
your review, please see the enclosed proposal, which is based on our understanding ofyour building
requirements up to this point.
As you review it, please be assured that we understand new building projects always come with many decisions
and a fair amount of stress! Our goal is to help make those decisions easier and reduce your stress with what we
feel is our industry's most responsive and collaborative buying experience.
Some other important factors set us apart and help us offer long-term customer satisfaction. For instance, the
renowned quality and engineering standards of Lester buildings means you get the most value from your
investment. In fact, with a solid reputation going back to 1947, Lester Buildings feature:
o Unmatched design flexibility to meet your unique needs
o Fast,cost-effectiveconstruction
. Strong, straight and true structures, with excellent curb appeal
o An industry-leading Lifetime Structural Design warranty
Of course, we do our own part by providing full-service project planning and construction services. We do so
with one goal in mind: to complete your project just as you envisioned it, in the agreed-upon time frame.
Our team here at Lester Buildings LLC. stands ready to work with you and we look forward to your comments
and questions.
Thanks again and, as always, feel free to contact me anytime al 612-756-1395 or jwight@lesterbuildings.com.
Respectfu lly Submitted,
.le lliirr \l'ight
Territory Manager
enc.
Attachment A
Detailed Building Specifications for Rick Morris, 3750 Arboretum Blvd,
Chaska, MN 55318
Lester Buildings LLC. proposes to deliver, furnish and erect to industry standards the described building
to the following location: Rick Morris, 3750 Arboretum Blvd, Chask4 MN 55318.
Lester Structural System: Uni-Frame Embedded
Width: 26'-0" Length: 38-4" Clear Height: lzt-0tt
Building Code: IBC-2012
End Use: Personal Use - Garage
Ground Snow Load (psf): 50
Roof Dead Load (psf): 4
Risk Class: General Use
UniForm Roof Snow Load (psf): 33.3
Truss Bottom Chord Load (psf): 5
Design Bottom Chord Braces for Ceiling Load: Yes
This Warranty allows for a properly designed Snow Retention Trim to be installed on this building.
Design Wind Speed (mph): I l5 Ultimate
Warranted Wind Speed (mph): 90.9
Exposure Category: C
Quotation on a code clear span building system with columns embedded in the ground at 9'-7" OC
and poured concrete footings.
. 3 ply 2x6 sidewall columns
. I ply truss 2x6l2x6
. Poured concrete footings
Material: Uni-Rib 28ga steel- AZ50 SMP
Top Chord Slope: 4 / l2 Overhangs: 12" Overhang around perimeter of building
Bottom Chord Slope: 0 / 12 Annex or Dormers: None
Additional: 2x6 roof purlins pocketed in saddle hangers between trusses for a flush roof system
EWI EW2 swl sw2
Panel Material: Uni-Rib
28ga Steel - AZ50 SMP
Panel Material: Uni-Rib
28ea - AZ50 SMP
Panel Material: Uni-Rib
28ga - AZ50 SMP
Panel Material: Uni-Rib
28ea - AZ50 SMP
Fasteners: Colored
Screws
Fasteners: Colored
Screws
Fasteners: Colored
Screws
Fasteners: Colored
Screws
Sheathing: None Sheathing: None Sheathing: None Sheathing: None
Insulation: House Wrap Insulation: House Wrap Insulation: House Wrap Insulation: House Wrap
Wainscot Material: Uni-
Rib 28ea - AZ50 SMP
Wainscot Material: Uni-
Rib 28ea - AZ50 SMP
Wainscot Material: Uni-
Rib 28ea - AZ50 SMP
Wainscot Material: Uni-
Rib 28ea - AZ50 SMP
Wainscot Insulation:
House Wrap
Wainscot Insulation:
House Wrap
Wainscot Insulation:
House Wrap
Wainscot Insulation:
House Wrap
Gable Material:None Gable Material: None Eave Material: None Eave Material: None
Additional: 2x6 flush frame (bookshelf) wall girts at 24" OC. Wainscot at 36"
Basic Construction
Roof *nd Roof Accessories
Insulation: None
Sheathing: None Fasteners: Colored Screws
Exterior Walls
EW1 EW2 sw1 Additional
Material: Uni-Rib
Liner 30ga-G40
Polv
Material: Uni-Rib
Liner 30ga-G40
Poly
Material: Uni-Rib
Liner 30ga-G40
Poly
Insulation: 6" FG
Insul Unfaced (R-
19)
Insulation: 6" FG
Insul Unfaced (R-
l9)
Insulation: 5" FG
Insul Unfaced (R-
t9)
s1v2 Cei'lins Partition Wall
Material: Uni-Rib
Liner 30ga-G40
Poly
Material: Uni-Rib
Liner 30ga-G40
Poly
Material: None
Insulation: 6" FG
Insul Unfaced (R-
1e)
Insulation: R-49
Blown Cellulose
Attic Insulation
Additional: Fully lined and insulated. Includes Attic access doors, blown attic insulation and vapor banier.
Exterior and interior finishes, require "surface mounted" electrical and plumbing fixtures and
connections. Any holes cut into the final finish material will require a labor and material surcharge. Consult
your salesperson for an estimate.
Openings Schedule
Refer to floor plan and or elevation drawings, AJ Door and Windows Product Bulletin, and Openings
Schedule Report for additional information.
ID Ouantity Type/Model/Size
A 1 Overhead Door Opening - Custom / Custom Size (16'wide xl0'high) No overhead door
included.
B J Window - Commercial / Window Vinyl Slider Thermal Pane / 4'0" Wide x 3'0" High with
color matched erids. insulation in the frames and removable screens
C I WalkDoor - Commercial / Wlk Door 7100 22x36 Lite / 3'0"x6'8" with color matched grids,
lever latches, door latch guard and deadbolt prep
D 1 Overhead Door Opening - Custom / Custom Size (10'wide x 10'high) No overhead door
included.
Additional: No overhead doors included.
Refer to Accessory Product Bulletins for additional information.
ID Quantity Twe/Model/Size
A I Rideecap - Metal / Ridsecap - Metal / Ridsecap - Vented
B 2 Cupola - Louver / Square - Louver I 24" Louver- non-operating
Additional: Continuous vented ridge full length of building.
.I*terior Walls/Partition lValUCeilinc
Accessorv Schedule
Additiunal Accessories
Gutters:S1:Gutter - F.B.O.
S2:Grrtter-FRO
Downspouts:S1:0
0
Snow Retention Trim:l:No
No
Additional:
Buildinp Color Schedule
Roof Colors
Roof:
Ouaker Grav
Non-Cfg Shingles:
N/A
Cupola Roof:
Ouaker Gray
Eave Trim:
Quaker Gray
Rake:
Quaker Gray
Cupola Body:
Snow White
Gutter:
N/A
Ridge Cap:
Ouaker Grav
Cupola Base:
Ouaker Gray
Ridge Vent:
N/A
Wall Colors
Exterior Walls:
Pewter Gray
Wainscot:
Quaker Gray
Ceiling Liner:
Liner White
Porch Root
Quaker Gray
Gable:
N/A
Eave Finish:
N/A
Wall Liner:
N/A
Porch Column Covers:
Snow White
Gable Louver:
N/A
Accent:
N/A
Porch Vblock:
Snow White
Insulated Wall Batten:
N/A
DownSpout:
N/A
Porch Ceiling or Soffit:
Snow White
Sofrit:
Snow White
Ooenins & Trim Colors
Base Trim:
Snow White
Overhead Door Panel:
N/A
Signature SIdg. Door
Field:
N/A
Dutch Dr. Insert:
N/A
Corner:
Snow White
Overhead Door Jamb:
Snow White
Signature Sldg Trim:
N/A
Dutch Dr. Frame:
N/A
Sldg. Door Panel:
N/A
Walk Door:
AJ White
Signature Sldg Jamb:
N/A
Horse Stall:
N/A
Sldg. Door Verticals:
N/A
Walk Door Trim:
Snow White
Signature Sldg Window:
N/A
Mansard Root
N/A
SIdg. Door Jamb:
N/A
Window:
Hayfield White
Signature SIdg Track
Cover:
N/A
Mansard Fascia:
N/A
Sliding Door Track:
N/A
Window Trim:
Hayfield White
Large Door Panel:
N/A
Mansard Soffit:
N/A
Sliding Door Bottom Girt:
N/A
Shutters:
N/A
Large Door Trim:
N/A
Clear Opening Trim:
N/A
Curtain Opening Trim:
N/A
Additional:
Attachment B
Item Includes Excludes
Site preparation x
Fill and preparation needed for concrete grade heights x
Lester building material package x
Labor x
Delivery x
Builders risk insurance x
General liabilitv and workmans' comp.x
Sisned ensineered drawings X
Architectural stamp x
Local buildins permits X
Concrete and placement ofconcrete x
Jobsite electricity x
Final exterior landscapins - eradine x
Electrical hook-up of overhead doors x
Interior finishing x
Dumpster x
Complete construction proiect debris placed in customer provided dumpster x
Tax x
Exclusions Note
All items not specifically listed above or noted elsewhere are excluded from this proposal. The investment
proposal assumes building site is prepared and level, with no underground obstructions, has easy and
obtainable Tractor/Trailer access and has no other features that can inhibit efficient construction
performance. Any delays or additional costs resulting from owner(s) or owner(s) agents negligence to or
failure to comply with any part of this contract, or have not completed site preparation prior to start of
construction will be charged extra material and labor according to Change Order Procedures and Schedules.
Work Authorization
No holds are applied to this project. It will be fully processed, produced, and delivered as scheduled.
Total Building Investment I $411889.91
Includes 80% Promo discount throush October 27, 2018
Note: This investment proposal is based on Lester Improv Project 060A- I 5406-02-00, and the Price File
QP092218 that expires on Nov 10, 2018.
Authorized this _ day of ,20
By (Buyer Signature)
Printed Name:
By (TM Signature)
Printed Name:
trnclusio nslExclu sion s
@
DEALER INFO.CUSTOMER INFO.BUILDING DESCRIPTION Customer Approval Bldg Direction
+
PRoJ: 0604-1 5406-02-00
Jennifer Wight
25434 Cedar Lane
New Prague, MN 56071
Rick Morris
3790 Lone Cedar Lane
Chaska, MN 55318
26'-0"x38'-5"x12'-0"
Uni-Frame Embedded
QP092018
PROPOSAL DRAWINGS ONLY
Not lnlendd for Constudlon Put@*s
(lnloals)
DATE:
prdhlnary deslgn udng tre hpd Foftd. The inal
d6lgn ls 3ubj*t to L*Gr Enghstug E*w-
NOT TO SCALE
@
Orry
J
O,r-mc
e!ry
O,Z-O-CR-
o
#^*
c-414"
cLMBRG
O+.oumore
n -4-4" CLMBRGt-
O*" "**o..
,1} ENDWALL E2 SECTIONttffi /:} SIDEWALL 51 SECTION
Y ) 2o'-2" FRoM E1
,E8TEN
BUIIOINES
DEALER INFO.CUSTOMER INFO.BUILDING DESCRIPTION Customer Approval Bldg Direction
^+
Y
(Mark Nonh)
PRoJ: 060A-1 5406-02-00
PROPOSAL DRAWINGS ONLY
Not lnl€nded for Consruclion PurposesJennifer Wight
25434 Cedar Lane
New Prague, MN 56071
Rick Morris
3790 Lone Cedar Lane
Chaska, MN 55318
26'-0"x38'-5"x12'-0"
Uni-Frame Embedded
QP09201 I (lnitials)
DATE:
preliminary d6si9n using the inpul providsd Th. nnel
desiqn is subFdto L6sld Engln€s.ins review
'NOTTO SCALE'
n 0'-0" FLooRF*
A EHBi.ir,.r+LL 1 ELRTATIO\,--//a SIDE'.'.'A-L 1 ELEI/ATION
\J-
d: l-Hl:1tr,1.1 I 7 Fl l-ur\l lotlffi ,5 :iltll-ti,q I ir Fl FUrr ll(lN
,E*rEfi
gUtLfitffEs
DEALER INFO.CTJSTOh,IER INFO.BUILDING DESCRIPTION {-}r, ulurr rcr Ap;;r o';a I BhlU Dirustiuil
L'ciF
iHirt]}d l
Prr(1,r. 060A-15406-02-00
PRUPL)SAL DRA\,UlNGS UNLY
icl @ d:dt tFr +JahFvEa(;Jennifer lvYight
25434 Cedar Lrrre
Nerv Frague, I\.lN 5{J071
Rick l\,lorris
3790 LonE Cedar Lane
Chrska, l\.lN 55318
2810" x 38 -5' x '2'-0"
Uni-Frarne Ernbedded
0P DC20'l S
irrhl{;
DATE
iErn tr.r..{.EiluJtr, I E r r-l -rord-d l'E l
.xr{. rErFrl ,: kd- !i[r*rE'ts Fr
'il:r l:l ;:il1
MEMORANDUM
TO: MacKenzie Walters, Planner I
FROM: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist
DATE: December 4, 2019
SUBJ: Variance to combine lots, 3790 Lone Cedar Lane
The applicant did not submit tree cover as part of the existing conditions survey, so staff cannot
confirm which, if any, trees will be removed for the proposed accessory building. Staff
recommends that the applicant meet ordinance requirement when applying for the building
permit and show all trees within the construction limits on the survey.
Recommendations:
1. The applicant shall include all trees 6” dbh and larger within the construction limits for
the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be
protected during construction.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COLINTY OF CARVER )
I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
November 21,2018, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen,
Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing to consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback variances in order to build
an accessory building (garage) on the lot located at3790 Lone Cedar Lane, Planning Case
File No. 2018-20 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said
notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all
such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and
addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer,
Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
thir3 <- day of F-k,.u< ryrb(,^ , 2018.
JEAN M. STECI.LiNG
Notary Public-Minnosota
(-otary Public
Clrnmbsion Explreo Jan gl, A01O
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used
as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various
city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and
is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the
Geographic lnformation System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are errorfree, and
the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or
any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision
in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes 5466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map
acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all
claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all
claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the
user's access or use of data Drovided.
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used
as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various
city, county, state and federal offlces and other sources regarding the area shown, and
is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the
Geographic lnformation System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are errorfree, and
the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or
any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision
in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes 5466.03, Subd. 21 (2OOO), and the user of this map
acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all
claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all
claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the
user's access or use of data provided.
(Next Record>rTAX_NAMED
<TAX_ADD_LIr
(TAX_ADD_L2I, <TAX_ADD_L3D
(TAX_ADD_L3D
B
ii
Fr
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Gommission Meeting
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date & Time:Tuesday, December 4,2018 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not
start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the aqenda.
Location:City Hall CouncilChambers, 7700 Market Boulevard
Proposal:
To consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback
variances in order to build an accessory building (garage) on
lot.
Applicant:Richard Morris
Property
Location:
3790 Lone Cedar Lane
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
What Happens
at the Meeting:
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
public hearing through the following steps:1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the oroiect.
Questions &
Comments:
lf you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the city's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-20. lf you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact MacKenzie
Walters by email at mwalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by
phone at952-227-1132. lf you choose to submit written
comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in
advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the
Commission. The staff report for this item will be available
online on the project website listed above the Thursday
prior to the Planning Commission meeting.
Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas,
packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to
www. ci. chan hassen. mn. us/notifvme to siq n u p!
. Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviem, Conditional and lnterim Usas, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings,
Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City
ordinanes require all property within at least 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the applietion in writing. Any interested
party is invited to attend the meeting.. Staff prepares a report on the subject appli@tion thal includes all pertinent information and a rs@mmendation. These reports are
available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overuiew of the report and a recommendation.
The item will b€ open€d for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the haaring pro@ss. The Commissaon will closa the
public hearing and discuss the item and make a re@mmendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify
wholly or partly the Planning Commission's rmmmendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority
vote of the City Council ex@pt rezonings and land use amendmenls from residential to @mmercial/industrial.. Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all appli€tions to be pro@ssed within 60 days unless the appli€nt waives this standard.
Some appli€tions due to their omplexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the
pro@ss should check wilh the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.. A neighborhood spokesperson/represenlative is en@uraged to provide a @ntaci for the city. Often developers are encouraged to
meet with the neighborh@d regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the prolsct with any interested person(s).
. Beeuse the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any @rraspondence
regardang the application will be included in the report to the City Council. lf you wish to have something to be included in the report,
please contacl the Plannino staff person named on the notificataon.
Date & Time:Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not
start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Location:City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Boulevard
Proposal:
To consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback
variances in order to build an accessory building (garage) on
lot.
Applicant:Richard Morris
Property
Location:
3790 Lone Cedar Lane
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
What Happens
at the Meeting:
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
public hearing through the following steps:1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the proiect.
Questions &
Gomments:
lf you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the city's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-20. lf you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact MacKenzie
Walters by email at mwalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by
phone at952-227-1132. lt you choose to submit written
comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in
advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the
Commission. The staff report for this item will be available
online on the project website listed above the Thursday
prior to the Planning Gommission meetinq.
Sign up to receive email andior text notifications when meeting agendas,
packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to
www. ci. chanhassen. mn. us/notifyme to siq n u p !
City Review Procedure:. Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and lnterim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rszonings,
Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendmonts require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City
ordinanes require all property within at least 500 feet of the subj*t sita to be notified of the appli€tion in writing. Any inlerested
party rs rnvrted to attend the meeting.. Staff prepares a report on the subject appli€tion that includes all pertinent information and a re@mmendation. These reporls are
available by request. At lhe Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a re@mmendation.
The item will be opened for the public to sp€ak about the proposal as a part of the hearing pro@ss. The Commission will close the
public hearing and discuss the item and make a re@mmendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, aftirm or modify
wholly or partly the Planning Commission's rmmmendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments lake a simple majority
vote of the City Council ex@pt rezonings and land use amendments from rssidential to @mmercial/industrial.. Minnesola State Statute 519.99 requires all applietions to be proessed within 60 days unless the appli€nt waives this standard.
Some applietions due to their @mplexity may take several months to @mplete. Any per$n wishing to follw an ilem through the
proess should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.. A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is en@uraged to provide a @ntact for the city. Often developers are enouraged to
meet with the neighborh@d regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the poact with any interested person(s).. Be€use the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any orespondence
regarding the appli€tion will be included in the report to the City Council. lf you wish to hav6 something to be included in the report,
oleas contacl the Plannino slaff oerson named on the notifi€tion
PIN
251700010
2s0080200
252940030
252940020
2s0080100
2s1700030
TAX_ADD_T2
CHANHASSEN
EXCELSIOR
CHASKA
BONITA SPRINGS
MINNEAPOLIS
CHASKA
TAX_ADD_13
MN 55317-0026
MN 55331.-3102
MN 55318-9652
FL 34134-2502
MN 55455-01.79
MN 55318-9652
TAX-NAME
ABRAHAM & DOROTHY ABBARIAO
JEFFREYJ & DEBRAJ PAPKE
SCOTTP&LAURIEAGAUER
WAWH BS FAMILY TRUST
REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MINN
KENNETH R & MARTHA t SORENSEN
TAX_ADD_11
PO BOX 26
6180 CARDINAL DR S
3820 LONE CEDAR CIR
265 BAREFOOT BEACH BLVD # 405
319 15TH ST SE 424 DONHOWE BLD
38OO LONE CEDAR CIR
SHAPE
3750 ARBORETUM BLVD
3810 LONE CEDAR CIR
3675 ARBORETUM DR
38OO LONE CEDAR CIR