The URL can be used to link to this page

2019 02 11 Agenda and PacketAGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2019 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Note: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. 1.Galpin Property Site Plan Update 2.Applebee's Site Redevelopment 3.Lyman Boulevard Joint Reconstruction Project Update B.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approve City Council Minutes dated January 28, 2019 2.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 15, 2019 3.Approve 2019 Key Financial Strategies and Legislative Priorities 4.Approve 2019/2020 Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard Contract E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda) 1.Senator Scott Jensen 2.Brent Carron 3.JoAnn Syverson F.NEW BUSINESS AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2019CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:00 P.M. WORK SESSIONNote: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Galpin Property Site Plan Update2.Applebee's Site Redevelopment3.Lyman Boulevard Joint Reconstruction Project UpdateB.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDERC.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTSD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated January 28, 20192.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 15, 20193.Approve 2019 Key Financial Strategies and Legislative Priorities4.Approve 2019/2020 Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard ContractE.VISITOR PRESENTATIONSVisitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete andsubmit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda)1.Senator Scott Jensen2.Brent Carron3.JoAnn Syverson F.NEW BUSINESS 1.Key Financial Strategy: Review the Practice for Addressing Citizen Requests for Traffic Safety Concerns G.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS H.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS I.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.Review of Claims Paid 02112019 2.Building Permit Data as of 02052019 3.January 2019 Website Analytics Overview J.ADJOURNMENT K.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Houlihan's, 530 Pond Promenade in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Galpin Property Site Plan Update Section 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.1. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director File No: Planning Case 201901 SUMMARY NOTE: This staff report was originally presented at the January 28, 2019 City Council Work Session. The applicant/developer will be providing updated information at the February 11, 2019 City Council Work Session. Before you tonight is a summary outline of the Planning Commission's review and suggestions on the Galpin Properties proposed development. It is staff's expectation for the Mayor and City Council to provide input/feedback regarding the US Home Corp./Lennar proposed Galpin Properties proposed development. DISCUSSION Below are the areas the Mayor and Council will comment on that need further consideration or amendments to the proposed plan in shaping the proposal and achieving a successful development: 1. Mayor and City Council's thoughts on the current proposed layout of the development. 2. Thoughts on preservation/tree loss. 3. Thoughts on taking advantage of the rolling terrain vs. mass grading the site. 4. Has the developer's plan limited the density transfer to the fullest extent? 5. Has the developer addressed the drainage issues and tree loss along the southerly border of the property? 6. Is there a good mix of housing types? 7. What other parts of the proposal could be improved that have not yet been mentioned? 8. Has the developer proved that there will not be an increased amount of water flowing to the Gorra property? 9. Should the City Council allow 41 units of density transfer in lieu of 45 acres of parkland dedication? ATTACHMENTS: PUD Concept Plan Power Point Ll23lzots Galpin Properties City Council Work Session January zB, zotg APPLICANT J.S. HOME CORPORATTON, D/B/A LENNAR SUMMARY OF RE,QUEST Rezoning RR to PUD-R Subdivision Preliminary Plat r9r lots Wetland Alteration 1.2 acres Background A Psrcel ID Ta{aycr Gts Iind Us Current Znning 256900030 PRN 8.95 t w D6ity I .2-4 uitvede R@l R6idotial 256900020 PRN 149.0 lnw Dffiity R@l R6idfllial 250100100 Paisl€y Park Erffipris Irc.121 ltr D6ity 1.2-4 @igaqe Runl R6id@tial 2569000r 0 PRN 20.78 Ifl D6ity I 24 mitvm Rwl Rsidatial 250100200 PRN 6.62 lrw D6ity 1.2-4 uitYa@ Rual R6idmial Total 188 -l9l L Ll23/zoLe Currently Zoned Rural Residential . Guided Low Density L.2-4.o units an acre RSF plan r.56 units/acre PUD Plan is z.z6 unit/acre " RSF (r5,ooo sq. ft. minimum lot) R-4 (r5,ooo for singlefamily detached and ro,ooo for a two famill'unit) RLIVI (sinsle-familu dwelling is-located on the lot, o.ooo iouare feet o6r drrellin-e init. a nuo-familu dwelindis z.z6o s'ouare feet ibr dil'ellins init a"nd a townho:use'or multiole-familil proiect islocated on the Iot, an average of s,4+s squar? Ieei per du'elling unit " PUD-R Cluster (There shall be no minimum lot size; howerer, in no case shall net densib'exceed guidelines established by the city comprehensire plan) , Any lot is the Shoreland Drstrict must be t5,ooo sq.ft. A Land Use Zoning Park Master Plan O 2 Ll23120L9 2oL7 System Plan Transfer of Density 3 Ll23/2OLs Transfer of Densitv RSF Subdivision rnith Aerials 4 1.123/201e 5 Concept PLID with Aerial Preliminary Plat request L/231207e Wetland Delineation Fiun2-ErililCor-is :o@ ,{F\ A -rh,!!3f lficrr.rru ^,,..,.... . Gla tr?.! OiIs :rlr-lll)(kk --ts-- Forest Inventory 6 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Applebee's Site Redevelopment Section 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.2. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director File No: BACKGROUND The owners of the Applebee's building, Solomon Brothers, is requesting release from two recorded documents on the site: the Declaration of Restrictions and the Declaration of Cross Access, Utility and Parking Easements. The releases require formal action from the City Council. DISCUSSION Solomon Brothers has provided a letter describing their intended use of the property, a bank which is restricted to only one lot in this subdivision. There was a bank, Americana, that was part of the shared parking; this bank was replaced by Walgreens. The release would allow for one bank to be a part of the shared parking. The developer would like to discuss with the City Council their plans for the property and receive direction and feedback. ATTACHMENTS: Letter from Solomon Real Estate Group Site Plan and Plat Bank Building Plan Sheets Declaration of Restriction Declaration of Easements a iBl?I','r;,, ^a cRouP "Where Wisdom and OpPortunitY Meet" February 1,2019 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community DeveloPment Director City of Chanhassen Re: Redevelopment Proposal (and Conditional Use Permit) for the former Applebee's property at 590 West 79h Street Dear Kate: Solomon Real Estate Group, Inc. dba Chanhassen West 79ft Street, LLC (the ..Developer" and "Property Owner") are seeking feedback and direction from the City of Chanhassen regarding our proposed redevelopment of the former Applebee's property located at 590 West 79n Street. The 1 .24-acreproperty contains an existing restaurant building (formerly occupied by Applebee's Restaurant) of approximately 5,500 square feet. The site is fully improved and contains 87 parking stalls. Applebee's vacated the building prior to our acquisition of the property in September of 2018. As you know, we have been very involved in the City of Chanhassen retail marketplace and have developed two successful retail properties in the past few years including the Chick-frl-A restaurant and the Village Shoppes of Chanhassen retail center anchored by Davanni's. We are excited about our recent acquisition of this property and we continue to look at investment opportunities within the Chanhassen coflrmunity. Since our acquisition of the property, we have evaluated the property and improvements at 590 West i9,h Street and have come-up with three basic redevelopment strategies for consideration: (1) re-use the existing building and put in another restaurant; (2) remodel and subdivide tire existing building for 2-3 smaller restaurant or retail tenants; and (3) demolish the existing building and redevelopment it with something new. All three options are valid considerations and have merit' After careful consideration, we favor redeveloping the property into a new banking facility for Bank of America. We have submitted for your review some preliminary plans of what this may look like with this type of redevelopment strategy. We understand that the proposed drive thru would require a Conditional Use Permit issued by the city. 8560 Kelzer Pond Drive Victoria, MN 55386 Phone: 65 1-336-6060 wrvrv. solontonre. cot-tt tHlrTyil,u "Where Wisdom and Opportunity Meet" We believe this proposed redevelopment strategy has some key benefits to be considered as follows: o Bank of America is national bank that invests heavily in the local community and would be a strong contributor and partner to the City of Chanhassen. o A bank use would require less parking which would allow for more shared parking with the adjacent properties (Buffalo Wild Wings, Chipotle and Tires Plus). o A bank use would have far less traffic than a restaurant or traditional retail use, which would provide some positive relief on the high trafficked intersections located off of West 79th Street. . The redevelopment would involve demolishing the old building and many of the existing site improvements which would allow for the following: o New architectural standards to be implemented with a new building; o New and updated site improvements, including new parking lot and landscaPing; and o An opportunity to meet new storm water management standards on site. We are seeking feedback and direction from the City Council on this proposed redevelopmeni strategy at their workshop session on February 1lth. Thank you for your consideration. If you should have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, 01 ^d*t Jay Scott Manager Chanhassen West 79 Street, LLC 8560 Kelzer Pond Drive Victoria, MN 55386 Phone: 651-336-6060 www. solotuotue.com ,*u'i,ltJ?;tt'o't 3E^Yi;S,4TIR NNAT Ot ot t{u &cl ,=t1-:,1 \k _\\-- , J.Psltf :ial LlLg--+.\ 7' gc +j Z. C qt g ?i lfiA6 I coNT f,'roolH t 2 iTO iFLTNDIi , ar.r LrNt HORtr LOCugl ie"r]s,-Ig!l rrt t-a.Ie_i n^tcH Ezt5ntl6 2',1' ac --\'*-" uf?\ Y'- '. -D lFrgtrclS ifD HAFLE .l{,)' ) --.( \\W ra Pi{ oax ?rt' CC 2\1'Ol, - - :;.t.i,_-i- .4. r \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r\,I\nE tJLrl)ilc PAt) \ \\ \\J\ ; )''' .?- o Cho n hosson,MN ii) ) : I l: It€ hr { fur ,x{w d0 pECLARATION OF RESTRTCTTONS RECITALS: A. Declamnt is the owrpr in fee sirple of certain real property located in Carver County, Minnesota, legalty described as: Irts l, 2, 3 and 4, Block I, CROSSROADS PI-AZA 3RD ADDmoN (hereinafter called the "Sub.lect Property'). NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant does hereby declare that the Subject Property shall he beld, impmved and utilizrd subject to the following rcstrictions, which shalt perpetually eruumber tbe Subject Property, shall run wi0l th Subject Property and shall be binding upon all parths heving any right, title or intcrest in the Subject Property or any part thercof, ard their nrccessors and .asigns (any of said parties hereimfter individually called a "Burdened Party", and cotlectivcly called the 'Burdened Parties'), and shall irurc to tlrc beoefit of Declaraut. 1. Except as otberwise consented to in writing by Declarant, the following shall be pennitd ard norpemdtted uses: Permitred Uses: a. Retail shops; b. Specialty retail; c. Apparcl eales; d. Aufo scrvice center with no qlside stomge of cars, tires or parts (no more than one); e. Day care that would be incorporated in the retail centcr; f. Rcsaurant/bar having at least 180 seats (no more than two); g. Heslth care facilitY; h. Professional busine.ss and administrative ofrices; or i. Dry cleaning. Non-Permitted Uses: a. Body shoPs; b. Car/boautrucliltrailersales; c. Car wash; d. Convenbnce store with or without gas PumPs; 28519.02 0,t2otfi CI{A}I/TIRES PLUS - TIIIS DECI-ARAflON OF RESTRICIiIONS ("Declaration") is msde as of this lE-day of Decertrbetr, 1995 by CITY Of CIIANHASSEN, a municipal corporation under tfu laws of th state of Miuresota (hcreinafier calld 'Delarant'). t. e. Fast food nestaurants; f. Bank;g. Equipment rental;h. Garden center;i. Lumber yard;j. Temporary uses of any kind;k. Wholesale nursery;l. Frce-standing day care;m. Liquor storc; orn. Hotels/motels. 2. All exterior surfaces of the building shatl be composed of at least eight percent (80%l face brick, stone or glass. The following materials shall not be atlowed as a viiible exterior application. Exposed concrcte or ncinder" block; Decorative concrcte block; Painred brick; Fabricated/comrgated metal; or Precast concrete materials. 3. All architectural designs must conform with City of Chanhassen Onlinance No. 212, as amended frorn tirne to time. 4. Outside trash containers and satellit€ dishes or antennas shall be scrcened or enclosed as rcquid by Declarant. Ventilation and air coditioning equipment on the roof of any building shall be hidden from view by parapets or, if on the ground, shall be screerrcd or errclosed as requircd by Declarant. 5. Lanrlscaping irutallation must be accompanM by an uuleiground irrigation system ard a orr year plant guaranty to cover replacement cost of nonsurviving plans. 6. This Declaration may only be amended, modified or supplemented by the combined written approval of the Declarant and all of flrose entities who are owners of the Subject Propertl' at the time such amendment, modification or supplement is proposed. 7. Each of the four lots affected by this Declaration shall be responsible for and shall pay orr{uart€r of the cost of corstnrction of the roads, driveways, and utilities as shown on Brhibit "A". It is anticipated that the owner of l.ot 1, Block l, Crossroads Plaza 3rd Addition, as tlrc first purchaser of any lot affected by this Declaration shall commerpe corrtruction of rcads, driveways, and utilities envisioned by this paragraph, which conEaction is hereby authorized. Declarant agrees that the sales of [.ots 2, 3, and 4, Block l, Crossroads Plaza 3rd Adrtition, shall obligate such ptrchasers to pay their share of such costs, includhg eryineering, administration, ard holding costs as part of the closing on any such lot. Upon such payment, the owner of lot 1, shall executf ard appropriate release indicating that this obligation has been satisfied. Neither the City of Chanhassen nor the 245I.9.02 09t20195 a. b. c. d. e. CHAII/'IRES PLUS '',r].:i I :.,j:. i ' :il:j, rt,:. '':. i .'?: !,:.,. it- 'l : ',. r1' j .:',1i i .:,r.::, ;: r; .1 : .:iii.r,.j -i ' ri:.ri jj ":. i ..i -i i, ,: i. .: t-.i .:. .i :':'r:r ;t rri;ij g i:li. j_ . .:ij t: :,:!. 11i.j .-.;, i ..;.: : .. :.. -t_ ..: 2 Declarant shall be responsible for payment of any costs refercnsed in this paragraph over and above Declarant's obligations as hereinbefore set forth. 8. Notwithstanding any provisions herein to the contrary, this Declaratiou arnd the restrictions set forth herein shall expire on the date which is the thirtieth anniversary of the date hercof. 9. Any notice required or permitted hereunder to be sent to Declarant shall be mailed by Unitd Sates registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, properly addressed as follows: City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 i or any other address designatd by Declarant by recording notice of such address. Any Plans or notices mailed to Declarant in accordarrce with this Section 9 shall be deemed to have becn receivcd by Dectarant on tlrc date which is the third busiress day after any such Plans or notice has been deposited in the mail. 10. Declarant and any subsequent owner of any lot subject to this Declaration shall have the right to enforce the provisiom of this Declaration through any proceedings. at law or inequity, rgainst any person or pe$ons violating, or attcmpting to violate, the pmvisions of this Declaration, either to prcvent such violadon or breach or to Fecover damages fcr such violation or breach. 11. Ttre resuictions contained lrcrein shall be demed and constnred to be continuing and no waiver of any breach of any of zuch restrictions shall be construed to be a waiver of any other breach of the same, nor shall failure to enforce the restrictions contained hercin be eonstnrcd as a waiver of such restrictions IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has made this Declaration as of the date and year first above written. :l' - rj. .+ ,,], '?:ii 1j' i .::. 24519 . 02 oot20f9, CITY OF CHANHASSEN CIIATI/TIRES PLIJS 3 ,t.-.: ii.:. srATE OF MTNNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) \ Tlris.instnrment was acknowledged betbre me this 2blaay ot U.cL,tmlr, , 1995 by Donald J. Chmiel, tle Mayor, and Don Ashworth, the City Manager for the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Miruesota. KAf,I}J J. EI.IGELFARDT NOfARy pt {tUC - MrYIIES0IA C,\BVqlCo(ldli-- --.uy co*ililii, dPu.lan Et, acm THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A. 3t7 Eagandale Office Center 13E0 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (612) 452-5000 JRW t26f,81380 i ,.i :- .l' t . .r 5.!.1 it i] '.i: *- j Lit:r' tr,.t.:+ { .j:.r'i :-i...:::: I .: il::. :.... :J I ar:.i- i :,.1r-' '' ' i"; t::,1 ' it:l:i '1.:..: :..! 4 28519.02 6rtmt% CIIAII/TIRES PLUS DEC a 'fi t6rtr,l rrc & ffimoE P.3 rf,F3ffi.e lglErlolll 0 gOrE, lE fL GvEts tbaU tle BssttBs aud EedeveloSnaat fu*orttf des!,ree Eo trqref€r tltla Co a loE gubjesE to thla Declaratioprlor Uo Ebr alete4fe*lggr aud rrctcuEt@ of the anendnent' Eo tbe iiifaraifm ttpfesf-rg tlle ExlrlDlg 1,. tt€n Ehc Purabeacr_.of gatd lot shBll pev es apuat blsed eD ehtg ErFrrlg f sith El.adjrrstreat dj,,Dll'f;f,1f,,IU'i$iefirttftbi65,jtti flj i,ftfij5irs.azg itatlablc. Is no 6vlfr4 ilrflf tlc omcr of lny lot srrUleat to ths occlentio be obll€Btcd to Day urrtt tLea lD fincr of aao8her IoE. SGrEet &Esvrslrrtssta?,ft!ry Smergtr:cr !!a;l8:Broeie @sE.ro1rgf.er gpfirerr Slte GrqctsE: oa8lt,8u,et1$r staklDg, IasDCcEl@, AE-Bu:LI! Drael"EE rcgnfhihfnfeErative/Ead cest*.rrsEt@ tnBtlngtaryf B. raeb lot oEer rball ?uy !o tbs ernsr of tret 1 a boldingr cosE (i-rr,.nsi ecsnf4 at a 11ggj.qi elgbt pcrccnt (8-t) per_anrun) calauieted f3g6 tha Eiua EbsE the baEe courBe ol aalD-hElt ag ffittrE-,-trf1-roeU tfnc -rs thrt lot ormei sel6gre6a to t-hc ostt6! &-#i- 1 6;;tr nrrflragt to tt,rg Et&rltt- a 9F qEY ErDs€qtf?t "nsffift;t uo AOi[ic-iT-ffi-"fui.e61q1-date ior-tbe Ddre courE€ of ffi;;iiE-d;t.hi""d-hicertlireatLon frqt tbc areb:lrcct ar-roalaeed $tth tht trrsr ol lot L. t\Ellg\Iu\g0c\B3tE.rll I 55r00o eor000 20,0oo 5r5oo 35r 000 10,000 12,000 strsgr 0ooJ.E -00O s1?3,500 , :...:: ... 1. I : :l .:j ..:';,!':1',.l1. 1.:. ..- j"i'i i t, 't:: i rl.' : 'il. rl :,i'!...]} ..1 t:i:I:. :.:..t ,ii'. i.:.':l . i:t :rl .:-1. ' ;;i; ,..:.:,1 I i.i: ..:i -..ir,ii ' i:,,:..a; :i .:. ',. :i..:: ,: I . i ..'. I ;. -' SIATE OF UIi{'GSOTA GARI'EB@UNWNBOOROER G t,tl €l $C.lc^J(-(ld TO b- o..ot 5.dzNol -t6la, --' =8Et0o,() Ng a rr + b i. { t 1 :. ::. . l7l?-t L4{ CROSSROA.DS PLAZA SRD ADDIruOAI a)() (n \z -t'(l [\ e -,tJ (f,' / hrBil.dllldtaD@dNo lOSduIffi MM.freg. / Sb n & lAMDooEnNo rDltd rto@h@NcT9ol6l. / M.ro.ilCoddfl fid 3 AhaMM. ll9l$d llfidM &.mro. / k&ofEll@rrfldslMMdM. l$ltd!tuMi k mt$. / Mdtdffi ilfldtltuDcrM! &. lDlt! d! f65Md No. mlt. fv-- r1, cvo?c) z.Rw- ^ ,\ t, N' (f"t'o -{-(n.jt ,/a % .. g't9O.r.'.o+ p" 2i'l D ----.----/\ 'u ,/ \\ 's, \.u-.^r ti i)',.At''h ).-v#l-- T.t'I 1 1i*\, d'I ai', E - l\ r rt ^ <: 1\ ,1., C A U - i,\-- IETLAND ffi 't, \" c tt., N 50 26 0 60 lo0E+5Ei SCALE IN TB8T /..- - - - =- _("9;f.,9,;\- _ _ _ g:1;.,,i\og*i frjffir -* ..i:::,:,"'::;^:i':i:,,.,::iIfonfronuh.nl.*+-..-l.""W"u. Dalolca iton tunufrcnl I ound ounotc, t/2 tnch by 11 tn.h rrdnonn..nt ,{3i". -t'1" - 'il&fith' ^ , ,, -Y "?-'.if"':*!^',::'r:,",":,"T';"',""","-: '''.if,?o,- ----- --)'zt -,;;.r'l!:J iibslndf;otkdd by uinna,oto lic.nar rc. a'r,,_"4-'O_ \\\- -, o ' -y' ,.;tr]J' tui,ntotion o, rhii Drot ts bda.d upon ' ""L?O,- \--_- ---=l -{li - ini"irii'"li "inciiiiu6i'pttza-1tb tobnou "rr, -o .1,n-,. ,--' .,a ..Lrarri^tira''? \ 1so\\' i \ P8rrns. Ptlcr t glldtoN LAND 9UNYBYOi'S, LTD. -/ - --- Drolhog. o^d utllllY.or.monlt or.-trs SItsETzOF2SEEETS o() AD C. 1t-ric CROSSROADS PI,AZA ADDITION T FILE NO. I U ffRlffi lY IW PlREf,Xt, ti.t tt. CITI 0t cMti. r f,tnil.ot. xuntctFt r.p{ttoir s..t Dro)rl.torr ol tht tolldlt &!.rlDd ,rwty rtt[tad rn ti. OuntJ ot Crft.r, 3t.t. !f Xnratolr, b Loh 6, a, ,, a .d l. llocl l. fru[I4 Etttoiltn ?nr, .crodt4 to !h. r.@6d plrt tmrol, qd.r and .ll ti.t Frtlo ol ,,n tnl€I, .r d6.t( ail d.alr.tad bJ FtffiIU oatttffifi NI, .Ecldtre to ti.r.codd rt.t lha6t, ca.v.r courtJr llrmtgb. titai lta! -ttrly of th tutErtJ arthrts af tmxrt.rly lli. at lo! t, llct l, ..ld lilla 0:I:1ff[ tfr, .I h! Br! 0t s. !0!ti..3t q{rrr ol th kiM.! ([.rt.r or scilo ltt lmt9 lla. I0 arrOrr.r td.tr, Ilnn.taU, lyl4 mrrly ot !h.o.!brlt .tot-otq ilm ot 3t.t. Irut flllrit b. !. ..m tL m b !a .0fiar.a d rl.ttd I Cl8tlilld M OllIil, d & n.r$, mr ard dt-6 tha tDlla tc !ali( rn tw.r lia bo{|.[d. tm alnat, .nd t[ rr-tt tar ddlr!. rt !ti-D@r.r .r tM 6 tilDl.tr irt: w'41 6 i) i'.?'t" N - 'sio :'ii:ti:e V /.1. / *t*q*mY-"-"*GET4Kl,ffiE .\\ MPe rt'Es .,,,,-',,i,.ii,iffiil,,.,,,,u0ECT , ^.ii \-$i{ .{3 ti.' r.'i,,.y .r'i 6.' i\tl I [^I Y I I -: EttwEulmcstEoaM1!0Wm.OfLm, 16 utsEuucuDqffi t, rat ru gr.0 E" r6a rm O ErcES'MEXIIGEEilr^bduohcretlto a IpEmuml, EEIGITEOIAlgIMMPA E E'I"D TUE A ruQt,@'f L IgI& DUCMMSEqA mttE,flld. I rycrmaEa^m - [rs n 0rqu0. [r) .ih hv ffi ttf #227 A ,),tr,,1';i'[)i' 5;t,e, 'r \BLOCK Lor f SHEET2OF2SHEETS f;li|i,a^; SHEETzOF2SHEETS r{'(:. (:: t -. ii j .)'ri'.:-t-) ,'..i ii: : i.i '/\ ji: ji, r \ r \.j\ .:' :-.\ :j, ::: t "''. (l:\ . .-: 'ii \ '. \t p (:- : i.l .:...) (i- - CROSSROADS PLAZA ?ND ADDITION - ( \ k Mffir tE 6 dr@r ,. d6waosWA@M6AWfuXAGAW \ 'or-i,. --')\ \ ,\\ 2J \ \20] \ "ii,,H ,l','-", \ 'd '-;-''-:'\i-{'--::'"' \ i,irt'- \ ijijTi.ilT i' \ I 4 I I I I I I GRAPHIC SCAI,E i5r,u' ^,*L 1d ao' D.ECLARAfiON OF cRoss AccEss, uTrLrTy ANp PARKING EASEMENTS rEIs DECT,ARA'TrON made this trday of , 1995, by the CITY OF CHANHASSEI{, a municipal corporation under the laws of ttre Sarc of Minresota (refcnd to herein as the 'CffY'). RECITAIS A. The CITY is the fee owrrcr of property in Cawer County, Minnesota described on tbe attached Exhibit nA": B. CITY desires to mmorialize rooess, utility ad parking easernerte and privileges over the Subjept Propeny for the berefit and apprtenant to the four loB platted within tte Subject Prropcrty. NOW, IUEREI]ORE, the CITY does hercby declare that $e Subject Property shatl be permanentty encumbercd with the easements described on Exhibit ]A' for as!€ssr utilrty and parking prrposes in accordance with the terms as set fonh hercin. l. Thc maiuennuce and repair of the access ard utility easement areas shall be Sared equa[y by each lot oumer. The maiffirce ard repir costs of the parking ar:eas shall be the rcsponsibility of tbe owner of each lot where the parkiag area is located. Notwithshrding the foregoing, fre City of Chrnhassen sball not be respoasible for any maiffioanc€ or repair com, 2. Each owner sball be obligated to maintain in good repair tbe parking area located on the owners lot. .{ 292L7.42 gw?sn5 Erhibit E Ch6h/fires Plus PA 3. In the event an owner fails or refuses to contribute toward that owner's share of maintenance and rcp1i1 costs for thc access and utility easement areas, the obligation for such costs will become a lien on the lot subftrt to this Agreement ard may be enforced by the party undertaking the rrccessary repain. 4. The easements described brein shall run with the lard and shall inure to the benefit ofeach owner ofthe Subject Property, their successors arxC assigns. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COLTNTY OF CARVER )ss. The foregoing iostnrmen was aclmwledged before me this 2M dary of December, 195, by Donald J. Ctmiel and Don Ashworth, the Mhyor and City Manager of THE CITY OF CHANIIASSEN, a municipal corporation under the laws of the StaE of Minnesota, on behalf of thc corporation and thtough autbority grao[ed by ia City Cortncil. 1[IIS INSTRTJMENIT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAI{PBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A. 317 EaFDdaIe OfEce Centcr 1380 Corporate Cemer Curve Esgan, MN 55121 Tele,phorre: (612) 452-5000 JRW i. * ,.i.:ii .Ir,': ,il :,::.j,li;, {rr:.if .;r':!::,i: ii ., :' '.1 ...j:i i.': . 1-t ::.\ .r .. i' :,: '1. - It 'ry, :,.ii'l i;xit) ir :,'.jj f 't1:.1. i .;::i: i 1 l:.i r , -.:! j ' .:-i '''t.:i . .:-.i. ' '''ir 29217.02 ool20l95 Exhibit E charvTires Plus PA CTTY OF CIIANIIASSEN ;.i: -,t 2 EIilIIBIT UA'' to DECLARATTON,O-f cR0ss AgcEss. UTILITy AJ$D PARKING EASEMENT Lesal Dssigtion TtE City of Chanhassen is the fec owner of Lors l, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, CROSSROADS P[*L?A, TIIIRD ADDffiON, according to the recorded plat thereof. fi19 easemcnt created herein may bc amerded from time to time provided such amendment is in writing, executd by ttre then-owners of all four of the above-described lots. and is filed for record in thc Office of the Carver County Recorder. There are hereby creatod for the b€nefit of the respetive owners of the above- described property the following two permam.nt easemetrts: Fesement No. I Easemeot No. I stntl be over, above, ard below the followitg described property: Tbat part of CROSSROADS P[-L?,,I., THIRD ADDITION, Chanhassen, Mirmesota, according to t[c plat thrpof on fih in the office of the County Rrcorder, Carver County, Minnesota, describd as follows: The soulrerly 4O.m feet of tb castcrly 20.00 fect of Lot l, Block 1, the southerly 40.00 fmt of th westerly 20.(X} feet of Lot 2, Block 1, the wcstrrly 20.fr) feet of lnt 3, Blck I aDd the east€rly 20.00 fcet of Lot 4, Block 1' This Easeme,lrt No. I sball bc for asoess and utility purpffies ard shall be appurenant to each of tbe four above{eec;iH lots to provide tbe owner of each such lot with utilig rights within Easemenr No.l , as well as acgess rights over and across Easement No' I to gaia rccess to tbe public street apputcnant to Lots 3 and 4, as well as for each lot to gain access to the otbr three lots in order to utilize tlre crosrparking easement, Easement No. 2 m berreimfter set forth. Easernent l.Io. 2 fasr.ment No, 2 is a cross-pa*hg easerrent to ploville the right to the owrpr of each of the fog above{e$cribed lots parkirrg privileges upon ttat portion of the other ftree lots improved and utilired for parkiqg pupos€s. This cross-prking eeseirent shsll not ereute any ercgmbrance oo ary portion of the above-described four los upon which buildings or st$ctures hve been established. It is anticipated trat this cross-parking easemcnt shall encumhr th parking arcas on each lot substantialty as set forth in tlre site plan for this subdivision as adopted by the Hursing and Redevelopment Authority in and for ttrc City of Chenlnssen on Nwember 13, 1995, as the same is from tirc to time modified or amended. 292t7.O2 @t20t95 Exhibit E Chan/Tires Plus PAIRACTer!ru@.,1[8 3.O. BOX I -ira1i,(A, MN55$A . Oo.P1-7r/s:o Certlff cate numaer jf3&Q!_ w_b pas"JAd_ STATE OF MINNESOTA r Oarnty ol C! u, I * OFFICE OFTTIE REOSTRAR OFTILE!} Tlilr b lo Ctnfiy rhe0 thb doarmm[ wec fil6d in hbolfraon rr" 3I. o*or-O&r- m. rg ? (:" ,-/O-cc**,.Qn. . REG| TRAB OT TNLE! il s, Pgr-=' KFEl\g{ o lNi NEs lNt$ gg F ti i$E *NItI \ Ni $$ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Lyman Boulevard Joint Reconstruction Project Update Section 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.3. Prepared By Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: Project No. 201202 BACKGROUND Carver County is planning to reconstruct the intersection of Highway 41 and Lyman Boulevard (County Highway 18), and Lyman Boulevard from just west of Highway 41 to Galpin Boulevard. The project is planned to begin construction in the spring of 2019.The Minnesota Department of Transportation, along with the City of Chaska and the City of Chanhassen would be financial partners in the project.The project has been planned for several years. On June 13, 2011 and on June 26, 2016, the City Council approved resolutions supporting Carver County federal funding applications for the reconstruction and widening of Lyman Boulevard from Highway 41 to Galpin Boulevard. Neither grant applications were successful. Carver County was successful in obtaining grant funds to help pay for the intersection improvements at Highway 41 and Lyman Boulevard. The section of Lyman Boulevard east of Highway 41 is a rural road section that is in poor condition. A significant portion of the road sits over poor soils which causes the road to shift. The section of Lyman Boulevard in Chanhassen does not have many crashes, but traffic is expected to increase from 6,000 ADT to 11,200 ADT by 2040. Lyman Boulevard would remain a twolane roadway until Peavey Road would transition to a fourlane divided roadway to Highway 41. The City of Chanhassen does not have any sewer and water utility services that need to be extended or replaced in this area. Eastern Carver County School District (ISD 112) and Southwest Transit are planning a joint bus facility on Norex Drive. It is estimate 73 buses will use Lyman Boulevard daily. Improvements to Lyman Boulevard east of Highway 41 generally include: 1. Reconstruct the roadway to an urban section and add concrete curb and gutter 2. Remove the poor soils and reconstruct the road to a 10ton design 3. Construct roundabouts at Norex Drive, Peavey Road and Highway 41 4. Construct a pedestrian trail on the north side of Lyman Boulevard 5. Stormwater treatment improvements DISCUSSION Carver County has secured $2,210,000 in grant funds to help pay for the intersection improvements at Highway 41 and Lyman Boulevard. Chanhassen is not programmed to help fund these improvements. Funding for the upgrade of Lyman Boulevard east of Highway 41 was agreed to in the Master Agreement between Carver County, City of Chaska and City of Chanhassen in 1994. This agreement was updated in 2008. Chanhassen CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 11, 2019SubjectLyman Boulevard Joint Reconstruction Project UpdateSection5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.3.Prepared By Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/CityEngineer File No: Project No. 201202BACKGROUNDCarver County is planning to reconstruct the intersection of Highway 41 and Lyman Boulevard (County Highway 18),and Lyman Boulevard from just west of Highway 41 to Galpin Boulevard. The project is planned to begin constructionin the spring of 2019.The Minnesota Department of Transportation, along with the City of Chaska and the City ofChanhassen would be financial partners in the project.The project has been planned for several years.On June 13, 2011 and on June 26, 2016, the City Council approved resolutions supporting Carver County federalfunding applications for the reconstruction and widening of Lyman Boulevard from Highway 41 to Galpin Boulevard. Neither grant applications were successful. Carver County was successful in obtaining grant funds to help pay for theintersection improvements at Highway 41 and Lyman Boulevard. The section of Lyman Boulevard east of Highway 41 is a rural road section that is in poor condition. A significantportion of the road sits over poor soils which causes the road to shift. The section of Lyman Boulevard in Chanhassendoes not have many crashes, but traffic is expected to increase from 6,000 ADT to 11,200 ADT by 2040. LymanBoulevard would remain a twolane roadway until Peavey Road would transition to a fourlane divided roadway toHighway 41. The City of Chanhassen does not have any sewer and water utility services that need to be extended orreplaced in this area. Eastern Carver County School District (ISD 112) and Southwest Transit are planning a joint busfacility on Norex Drive. It is estimate 73 buses will use Lyman Boulevard daily.Improvements to Lyman Boulevard east of Highway 41 generally include:1. Reconstruct the roadway to an urban section and add concrete curb and gutter2. Remove the poor soils and reconstruct the road to a 10ton design3. Construct roundabouts at Norex Drive, Peavey Road and Highway 414. Construct a pedestrian trail on the north side of Lyman Boulevard5. Stormwater treatment improvementsDISCUSSIONCarver County has secured $2,210,000 in grant funds to help pay for the intersection improvements at Highway 41and Lyman Boulevard. Chanhassen is not programmed to help fund these improvements. Funding for the upgrade of Lyman Boulevard east of Highway 41 was agreed to in the Master Agreement between Carver County, City of Chaska and City of Chanhassen in 1994. This agreement was updated in 2008. Chanhassen would not participate in any costs associated with the TH 41 improvements or improvements to Lyman Boulevard west of TH 41. Chanhassen would not participate in the rightofway cost or parking lot improvements in Chaska. The 2019 CIP has programmed funds for the city's share of the project. The city would need to advance State Aid funds. Advancing state aid funds has been approved by the City Council on other larger roadway projects. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST PARTICIPATION State Grants for Highway 41 Improvements $2,210,000.00 Carver County $4,804,854.66 City of Chaska $1,473,977.06 City of Chanhassen $2,228,921.16 Total $10,717,752.88 SCHEDULE City Council approves JPA and Resolution for State Aid Advancement February 25, 2019 Start Construction Spring 2019 Substantial Completion Fall 2020 ATTACHMENTS: Layout Cost Estimate CIP sheet Cost Participation Layout MSA Fund 3 LINES 2 LINESTV TV ABANDONEDABANDONED1 2" 4" STEEL4" STEEL4" STEEL12" STEEL4" STEEL3" STEEL2" STEEL2" STEEL3" STEEL 4" POLY8" PVC8" PVC10" PVC10" PVC 12" RCP 12" RCP 12" RCP 12" RCP8" PVC 8" PVCABANDONEDWT T T TTVTVT T TVTTT16" WM 12" WM16" WM12" WM 12" WM12" WM1 2" WMHH HH HH S TMS T T S T T T T TTTT TV T E E T T S T S S T T T DIDIDI PETRO DI P E C.O. DI DIE 4.0%4.0% GRADE PROFILE 2.0% THRU 2.0% GRADE PROFILE BLVD 10.0' BLVDTHRU 2.0% THRU VAR (1:4) (OR FLATTER) B424 C&G 16.0' B424 C&G B424 C&G DESIGN SPEED = 55 MPH B424 C&G 10.0' TRAIL 2.0' 2.0% EX. R/W EX. R/W 4.0' MEDIAN 2.0% 16.0' THRU 14.0' LC 14.0' DESIGN SPEED = 55 MPH EX. R/WEX. R/W 4.0% GRADE PROFILE 2.0% THRU 2.0% GRADE PROFILE BLVD 10.0' THRU 2.0% THRU VAR (1:4) (OR FLATTER) B424 C&G 16.0' B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G 4.0' MEDIAN 2.0% 16.0' THRU 14.0'14.0' LC 6.0' 4.0% BLVD VAR (1:4) (OR FLATTER) 10.0' TRAIL 2.0' 2.0% 6.0'1:3DITCH 4.0'-8.0'1:3DITCH 4.0'-8.0' (OR FLATTER) VAR (1:4) SOUTH OF LYMAN BLVD (CSAH 18) HAZELTINE BLVD (TH 41) NORTH OF LYMAN BLVD (CSAH 18) HAZELTINE BLVD (TH 41) HAZELTINE BLVD HAZELTINE BLVD051015 02 20 25 30 35 40 45 55 60 65 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 6 5 70 45 50 55 60 6570 75 5 10 86 2000100 scale in feet SUBJECT TO CHANGE 8/1/2017 PRELIMINARY LEGEND WETLANDS (TOE OF SLOPE) PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION LIMITS RAISED MEDIANS & CURBS PAVED SHOULDERS PROPOSED PONDING LOCATION PAVED ROADWAY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY BITUMINOUS TRAILS & BIKEWAYS CONCRETE TRUCK APRON PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT LANDSCAPE MEDIAN PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT MILL AND OVERLAY ROADWAY EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW PEAVEY RDN JONATHAN BLVD NOREX DRGALPIN CT GALPI N BLVDSTONE CREEK DR YEAR 2040 313A , 982P671A, 687P556A , 478P 982A, 730P981A, 384P702A, 860P373A, 664P 466A, 969P717A, 418P 718A, 764P329A, 886P 627A, 909PYEAR 2040 434A , 749P42A, 100P981A , 384P 77A, 348P792A, 498P200A, 59P313A, 982P 229A, 42P917A, 387P 202A, 237P436A, 927P 165A, 45PPEAVEY RDYEAR 2040 504A , 720P105A, 194P792A , 498P 771A, 601P196A, 62P434A, 749P 862A, 613P 399A, 670P 70A, 115P91A, 12P2040 FORECAST GALPIN BLVD0A, 0P 604A, 496P 167A, 105P 0A, 0P 435A, 552P 200A, 245P 0A, 0P0A, 0P0A, 0P69A, 168P0A, 0P390A, 210PLYMAN BLVD LYMAN BLVD PEAVEY RDNOREX DRLYMAN BLVD DRIVEWAYVOLUME CIRCULATORY AM/PM VOLUME CIRCULATORY AM/PM VOLUME CIRCULATORY AM/PM TRAFFIC VOLUMES LYMAN BLVD (CSAH 18) 5,200 AADT 2012 /11,100 AADT 2040 TRAFFIC VOLUMES LYMAN BLVD (CSAH 18) 1,150 AADT 2012 /9,000 AADT 2040 HAZELTINE BLVD (TH 41)HAZELTINE BLVD (TH 41)TC&W RAILWAYCITY OF CHASKACITY OF CHANHASSENCITY OF CHASKA CITY OF CHANHASSEN 14' 14' L Y MA N B L V D ( C S A H 1 8)LYMAN BLVD (CSAH 1 8)PEAVEY RDBOU LD E R RD EX. 1 4' RT TURNEX. 1 4' L T TURNEX. 1 2' THRUEX. 1 2' THRUEX. 1 2' THRUEX. 1 4' THRUEX. 12'EX. 12'EX. 14'EX. 14'SHLDTHRUTHRU/LT TURNRT TURNEX 24' THRUEX 14' LT TURNEX 14' THRU/RT TURNE X . 14' T H R U E X . 12' T H R U E X . 12' T H R U E X . 12' T H R U 14' X 300' 14' X 300' L T T U R N R T T U R N 12' THRU 12' THRU 14' THRU 12' THRU 10' TRAIL 1:40 4' SHLD EX 4' SHLD E X 4' S HL D 4' SHLD 1:15 1:40 1 :15 1:3010' TRAIL 3 8'REX. 17' THRUEX. 20' THRU12' THRU12' THRU 8' SHLD 8' SHLD CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY CARVER COUNTY CITY OF CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA { NOREX DR { PEAVY RD { HAZELTINE BLVD 24'24'24'24' 1:30 1:30 1:40 4' SHLD 12' 8' SHLD 12' THRU 12' THRU 12' THRU 10' TRAIL 8' SHLD 8' SHLD18' THRU18' THRUEX. 18' THRUEX. 18' THRU28'R 36'R 33'R 33'R 25'25'NORPA KCURT '8NORPA KCURT '3 1 NORPA KCURT '31 18' 16'24'24'18' 16'EX. 20' THRUEX. 20' THRU20'20'14' THRU 12' THRU 12' THRU/LT TURN 12' THRU/RT TURN 4'R 8'R 8'R 8'R 14' RT TURN 14' THRU/LT TURN 14' THRU 14' THRU 17' 17'17'17'55'R 45'R 44'R 1 1' THRU1 1' THRU1 6' LT TURN1 1' THRU1 6' LT TURN1 1' THRU10' TRAIL 10' TRAIL 6' 6' 6' 6'6' 6' 10' TRAIL 6' 6 '12' RT TURN16' THRU/LT TURN16' THRU12' THRUTRAFFIC VOLUMES HAZELTINE BLVD (TH41) 15,700 AADT 2012 /18,200 AADT 2040 TRAFFIC VOLUMES HAZELTINE BLVD (TH 41) 12,700 AADT 2012 /16,400 AADT 2040 HAZELTINE BLVDTH 41CSAH 18 CSAH 18 CSAH 18 LYMAN BLVD CSAH 1812' THRU12' THRU12'12' SHLD10' SHLD10' SHLD10' SHLD1:301:501:10EX 12' SHLDEX 12' THRUEX 12' MEDIANEX 12' THRUEX 2' SHLDEX 12' SHLDEX 12' THRUEX 12' THRUEX 2' SHLD12' THRU12' THRU12' SHLD10' SHLD10' SHLD12' THRU12' THRU14' RT TURN16' THRU/LT TURN16' THRU14' THRU12' SHLD10' SHLD1:501:101:101:501:37.21:1010' TRAIL43'R 43'R 6. 7' SHLD6. 7' SHLD4 4'SPEEDLIMITXXEXISTINGSPEED LIMIT 50 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT40EXISTINGSPEEDLIMIT45EXISTING SPEEDLIMIT40EXISTINGSPEEDLIMIT45EXISTINGSPEED LIMIT 50 EXISTING SPEEDLIMIT50EXISTINGSPEEDLIMIT50EXISTINGSPEEDLIMITXXEXISTINGB24 C&G B24 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B612 C&G B612 C&G B612 C&G B612 C&G B612 C&G B424 C&GB424 C&G B424 C&G B418 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G B424 C&G MNDOT STD PLATE 7113 MNDOT STD PLATE 7113 RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL24'26'RETAINING WALL { E.B. C.S.A.H 18 { N.B. T.H. 41 B612 C&G { E.B. C.S.A.H. 18 { E.B. C.S.A.H. 18 { W.B. C.S.A.H. 18 { W.B. C.S.A.H. 18 { S.B. T.H. 41 (60 MPH) e = NC 0°30' C (30 MPH) e = NC 300.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 300.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 300.00'R (20 MPH) e = NC 150.00'R (20 MPH) e = NC 150.00'R (20 MPH) e = NC 150.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 300.00'R (20 MPH) e = NC 150.00'R (20 MPH) e = NC 150.00'R (20 MPH) e = NC 150.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 300.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 300.00'R (20 MPH) e = NC 150.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 300.00'R (20 MPH) e = NC 120.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 300.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 1000.00'R (20 MPH) e = RC 250.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 800.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 800.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 3005.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 3000.00'R (25 MPH) e = NC 240.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 700.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 692.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 500.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 500.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 2230.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 943.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 951.00'R (40 MPH) e = 0.034 1932.00'R (40 MPH) e = 0.034 1924.00'R (30 MPH) e = NC 1005.00'R4'4'1 0' TRAI L10'DESIGN SPEED = 40 MPH 2.0% GRADE PROFILE MEDIAN THRU 14.0'14.0' B624 C&G (MOD.) D424 C&G D424 C&G (MOD.) B624 C&G LC BLVD 4.0% EX. R/W EX. R/W 2.0% 6.0'10.0' TRAIL BLVD 2.0' 6.0' 4.0' GRADE PROFILE 2.0% THRU 14.0' THRU 14.0' THRU 2.0% 1.5%2.0% 1:4 1:4 1:4LYMAN BLVD WEST OF HAZELTINE BLVD (TH 41) LYMAN BLVD (CSAH 18) EXISTING BENTLEY LOT EXISTING JONACO LOT DESIGN SPEED = 40 MPH EX. R/W EX. R/W 2.0% GRADE PROFILE MEDIAN THRU 14.0'14.0' B624 C&G (MOD.) D424 C&G D424 C&G (MOD.) B624 C&G 2.0% VAR.10.0' TRAIL BLVD 6.0' 4.0' GRADE PROFILE 2.0% THRU 14.0' THRU 14.0' THRU 2.0% VAR. LCLC B624 C&G THRU 12.0' 2.0% BLVD 4.0%2.0% B624 C&G GRADE PROFILE THRU 12.0'10.0' TRAIL BLVD LC DESIGN SPEED = 40 MPH EX. R/W EX. R/W 6.0'6.0' SHLD 8.0' SHLD 8.0' 2.0%2.0% 3.0' 2.0%1.5%2.0%4.0% BLVD 6.0' 1:3or 1:4 1.5% 5.0'1:31:3 DITCH 2.0%2.0%1:31:3 DITCH 4.0'-8.0'4.0'-8.0' LYMAN BLVD LYMAN BLVD BETWEEN HAZELTINE BLVD (TH 41) & PEAVEY RD LYMAN BLVD (CSAH 18) & EAST OF NOREX DR BETWEEN PEAVEY RD & NOREX DR LYMAN BLVD (CSAH 18) B624 C&G 3.0% 14.0' RT. TURN 12.0' THRULT. TURN 14.0'12.0' THRU 2.0%3.0% 6.0' MEDIAN 16.0' THRU 14.0' THRU D424 C&G (MOD.) D424 C&G (MOD.) B624 C&G 2.0% E.B. LYMAN BLVDLCLCW.B. LYMAN BLVD 48.0' DESIGN SPEED = 45 MPH 2.0%2.0% GRADE PROFILE GRADE PROFILE EX. R/W EX. R/W 10.0' TRAIL BLVD 6.0' 1.5% 5.0' 2.0%2.0%1:31:3 DITCH BLVD 4.0% 6.0'1:31:3 DITCH 4.0'-8.0'4.0'-8.0' WEST OF GALPIN BLVD LYMAN BLVD (CSAH 18) Project 128637 CSAH 18 From 0.25 W of TH 41 to Galpin Blvd December 26, 2018 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST PARTICIAPTION Modified Master Agreement: Cap Escalation/Reduction, County pays for 50% Lyman East R/W (land only), City Share by parcel in each City. (Land Only). County pays 100% of Parking Lot Mitigation. County Pays 100% of Lyman West. Rationale: reduce cost burden to cities while keeping to spirit of past agreements. R/W handled similar to recent CIP projects (50% County-50% City). Remaining Cap = 2,763,290.00$ CSAH 18 East of TH 41 CSAH 18 West of TH 41 TH 41 Project Cost Splits Roadway Split Up to Cap Roadway Split After Cap R/W Mitigation (Parking Lot/Wall) R/W Land Splits Roadway Splits R/W Mitigation (Parking Lot/Wall) R/W Land Splits Roadway Splits R/W Mitigation (Parking Lot/Wall) R/W Land Splits Chanhassen 40.29% 45.00% 0.00% 2.20% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Chaska 19.42% 10.00% 0.00% 47.80% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Carver County 40.29%45.00%100.00%50.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00% Engineering 20.00%of Construction Cost Estimated Costs (90% Estimate) ROADWAY R/W* Mitigation (Parking lot, retaining wall) R/W Land* UTILITIES Engineering (20% of construction) Totals TH 41 1,713,967.52$ 203,657.00$ 714,606.69$ 383,524.90$ 3,015,756.12$ Lyman (CSAH 18) - WEST OF TH 41 744,672.60$ 148,934.52$ 893,607.12$ Lyman (CSAH 18) - EAST OF TH 41 4,393,873.32$ 439,943.00$ 563,742.45$ 966,763.26$ 6,364,322.03$ Fiber (Carver County) 65,981.80$ 13,196.36$ 79,178.16$ Watermain (Chaska)304,074.54$ 60,814.91$ 364,889.45$ Totals 6,852,513.44$ 643,600.00$ 1,278,349.14$ 370,056.34$ 1,573,233.96$ 10,717,752.88$ Note: * See Separate Sheet. Lyman West R/W costs included in TH 41 costs Summary of Cost Shares Roadway R/W* Mitigation (Parking lot, retaining wall) R/W Land* Utilities Engineering (20% of construction) Total Total Project Splits Lyman - Road Construction Only Construction Splits Lyman - R/W (Land)R/W Splits Lyman - Parking Lot Mitigation PK Lot Splits Carver County TH 41 1,713,967.52$ 203,657.00$ 714,606.69$ 383,524.90$ 3,015,756.12$ 28.1% Carver County Lyman West 744,672.60$ -$ -$ 148,934.52$ 893,607.12$ 8.3% 744,672.60$ 100%-$ 100%-$ 100% Carver County Lyman East 1,847,092.04$ 439,943.00$ 281,871.23$ 457,407.01$ 3,026,313.27$ 28.2% 1,847,092.04$ 42%281,871.23$ 50.00%439,943.00$ 100% Carver County Utilities 65,981.80$ 13,196.36$ 79,178.16$ 0.7% Chaska TH 41 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0% Chaska Lyman West -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0% -$ 0%-$ 0%-$ 0% Chaska Lyman East 699,689.25$ -$ 269,460.51$ 139,937.85$ 1,109,087.61$ 10.3% 699,689.25$ 16%269,460.51$ 48%-$ 0% Chaska Utilities 304,074.54$ 60,814.91$ 364,889.45$ 3.4% Chanhassen TH 41 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0% Chanhassen Lyman West -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0% -$ 0%-$ 0%-$ 0% Chanhassen Lyman East 1,847,092.04$ -$ 12,410.71$ 369,418.41$ 2,228,921.16$ 20.8%1,847,092.04$ 42%12,410.71$ 2%-$ 0% Totals 6,852,513.44$ 643,600.00$ 1,278,349.14$ 370,056.34$ 1,573,233.96$ 10,717,752.88$ 100% 5,138,545.92$ 563,742.45$ 439,943.00$ Funding Sources Roadway R/W* Mitigation (Parking lot, retaining wall) R/W Land* Utilities Engineering (20% of construction) Total Total Project Splits TH41 1,713,967.52$ 203,657.00$ 714,606.69$ -$ 383,524.90$ 3,015,756.12$ COOP (LPP) (710,000.00)$ (710,000.00)$ 24% TED (1,003,967.52)$ (153,238.98)$ (342,793.50)$ (1,500,000.00)$ 50% Carver County Sales Tax -$ 203,657.00$ 561,367.72$ -$ 40,731.40$ 805,756.12$ 27% Lyman East (CSAH 18)4,393,873.32$ 439,943.00$ 563,742.45$ 370,056.34$ 1,040,774.53$ 6,808,389.64$ Lyman East Carver County CSAH 1,847,092.04$ 439,943.00$ 281,871.23$ -$ 457,407.01$ 3,026,313.27$ 44.4% Carver County Sales Tax 65,981.80$ 13,196.36$ 79,178.16$ 1.2% Chaska MSAS 699,689.25$ -$ 269,460.51$ -$ 139,937.85$ 1,109,087.61$ 16.3% Chaska Local -$ -$ -$ 304,074.54$ 60,814.91$ 364,889.45$ 5.4% Chanhassen MSAS 914,866.02$ -$ 12,410.71$ -$ 228,716.51$ 1,155,993.24$ 17.0% Chanhassen Local 932,226.02$ -$ -$ -$ 140,701.90$ 1,072,927.92$ 15.8% Lyman West (CSAH 18)744,672.60$ -$ -$ -$ 148,934.52$ 893,607.12$ Carver County CSAH 744,672.60$ -$ -$ -$ 148,934.52$ 893,607.12$ 100% City can claim MSAS for all eligible work within City Limits and upto 25% of construction cost for engineering $ 1,473,977.06 $ 2,228,921.16 $ 3,105,491.43 Carver County Chaska Chanhassen 2/4/2019 G:\ENG\state-aid\MSA Projected Fund Balance City of Chanhassen, City # 194 Municipal State Aid Construction Fund Account Estimated Yearly Expenditures and Balances Assumes State Aid has sufficient funds to Advance Maximum Advancement $4M Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Beginning Year Balance $10,276 -$1,566,400 -$2,524,609 -$2,663,982 -$4,684,143 -$3,784,707 -$4,265,282 Allocation (assume 2% adjustment annually $923,324 $941,791 $960,627 $979,839 $999,436 $1,019,425 $1,039,813 Yearly Programmed Expenditure $2,500,000 $1,900,000 $1,100,000 $3,000,000 $100,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 Year Ending Balance -$1,566,400 -$2,524,609 -$2,663,982 -$4,684,143 -$3,784,707 -$4,265,282 -$5,225,469 Lake Drive E Minnewashta Pkwy Market Blvd Galpin Blvd.TH 41/82nd St. Signal Bluff Creek Drive Pleasant View Road $700,000 Powers Blvd. Ped Crossing $300,000 $1,200,000 $600,000 $3,000,000 $100,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 Lyman Blvd. Galpin to 41 Lake Lucy Road Lake Drive W. & Great Plains $1,500,000 $700,000 $500,000 $900,000 - Closed Bond Fund $100,000- 212 MUSA Assessment Bonds Subtotal $2.5 Million Lyman Signal Imp. On TH 41 Bluff Creek Drive (Pioneer Trail to Flying Cloud Drive) Pleasant View Road (Powers to TH 101)Projects Lake Drive Imp. (Dell to Dakota) Lyman Blvd west of Galpin Blvd. Powers Blvd. Ped Crossing Galpin Blvd. (TH 5 to north City limits) Market Blvd. Imp. (78th to TH 5) Lake Drive E ( Dakota to Great Plains) Great Plains south of TH 5 Minnewashta Pkwy (TH 7 to south City limits), Lake Lucy TH 41 to Galpin Blvd. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated January 28, 2019 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the minutes dated January 28, 2019.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: City Council Summary Minutes dated January 28, 2019 City Council Verbatim Minutes dated January 28, 2019 City Council Work Session Minutes dated January 28, 2019 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JANUARY 28, 2019 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Josh Kimber 2060 Majestic Way PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS. Mayor Ryan read an invitation to the February Festival being held on Saturday, February 2nd at Lake Ann and provided an update on the City’s outdoor rinks and warming house weather policy. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated January 14, 2019 2. Resolution #2019-06: Approve Establishment of County State Aid Highway 101 between Pioneer Trail and Lyman Boulevard 4. Resolution #2019-07: Approve Purchase of 2019 CIP Equipment All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. CONSENT AGENDA: 3. APPROVE LAKE ANN PARK EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY. Mayor Ryan pulled this item to ask staff for clarification. Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves $10,000 for Phase 1 of the 2019 Park and Trail Acquisition and Development City Council Summary – January 28, 2019 2 Improvement Program Expenditure for Lake Ann Park Expansion Feasibility Study. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE. Chief Don Johnson presented the updates on staffing levels, calls for service, training and other activities attended by the Chanhassen Fire Department. Lt. Eric Kittelson presented updates on activity descriptions by class, December and year end numbers, 2019 Chanhassen Policing Work Plan and year end report data review for 2014 through 2018. PUBIC HEARING: ORCHARD LANE AREA STREET & UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT-ADOPT ASSESSMENT ROLL AND AWARD CONTRACT. Paul Oehme presented the staff report on this item. Councilwoman Coleman asked if staff had received any other feedback from residents other than the 3 people who showed up to the neighborhood meeting. Mayor Ryan asked for clarification of the curb and gutter transition with 64th Street, communication with the residents, and design and maintenance of the rain garden prior to opening the public hearing. No one spoke at the public hearing. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The public hearing was closed. Resolution #2019-08: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids and awards the contract for the Orchard Lane Area Street and Utility Reconstruction Project No. 18-01 to Northwest Asphalt Inc. in the amount of $1,987,011.56; and Resolution #2019-09: to adopt a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Orchard Lane Area Street and Utility Reconstruction Project No. 18-01. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. APPROVE VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AT 3790 LONE CEDAR LANE. Paul Oehme presented the staff report on this item. Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing. No one spoke at the public hearing. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The public hearing was closed. City Council Summary – January 28, 2019 3 Resolution #2019-10: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of public drainage and utility easements dedicated as follows: 1. The westerly 10.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, CEDAR CREST, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota (P.I.D. No. 251700010); and 2. The easterly 10.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, CEDAR CREST, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota (P.I.D. No. 251700020). All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan apologized for skipping over visitor presentations before outlining the new procedure to be implemented with a Citizen Action Request form. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan explained that going forward she would ask council members to share updates from the various boards and commissions they attend. Councilman McDonald provided updates from the Southwest Transit Commission and Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Commission. Mayor Ryan provided an update from her and Mr. Gerhardt attending the Carver County Leaders Meeting in which the opioid crisis in Carver County was discussed. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Todd Gerhardt thanked the employees in the utility department for their work in the extremely cold weather and extended his appreciation to Paul Oehme, the Public Works Director, who has decided to resign his position and become the Public Works Director for the City of Lakeville. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. Todd Gerhardt commented on Dr. Peterson from School District 276’s comments regarding their 2019 Legislative Position Statements. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 2019 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Josh Kimber 2060 Majestic Way Mayor Ryan: Thank you and welcome to this evening’s meeting. I apologize for our tardiness in starting the meeting tonight. Our work session ran a little bit over. To those of you that are watching at home either on Mediacom cable channel or those who are streaming from Chanhassen’s website, we are glad you can join us. For the record we have all of our council members present tonight so our first action is our agenda approval. Council members are there any modifications to the agenda as printed? If not we will proceed with the published agenda. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS. Mayor Ryan: We have a couple public announcements tonight. First and foremost our Feb Fest announcement. The City of Chanhassen is proud to announce the first community event of 2019. It’s the 26th Annual February Festival, otherwise known as Feb Fest. This is the first in the year long series of special events that are sponsored by the City of Chanhassen, local service organizations and the local business community. February Festival will be held on Saturday, this Saturday, February 2nd and I invite the residents, their families, friends to join us on Lake Ann. Events begin at 12:00 noon and include ice skating, sledding, sleigh rides, dog sled rides snow shoeing. This one’s really cool, fat tire bike demo’s, kick sled demo’s, bonfires, medallion hunt and the always popular ice fishing contest. Hot food and concessions will be sold on the ice by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen and Culver’s. Boy Scout Troop #330 will be selling live bait and yummy S’mores kits. The ice fishing contest will run from 1:00 p.m. and includes, or 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. It includes over $6,000 dollars in prizes and each Feb Fest attendee will receive one free door prize ticket at the event for a chance to win over $3,000 dollars in door prizes. Ice fishing tickets are $10 a person and are available at City Hall and online on the City’s Feb Fest page. For more information watch the Chanhassen Villager or visit the City’s website and I look forward to seeing everyone there and I believe that we are going to get up into the 30’s by Saturday so everybody can come out of their homes and join us this Saturday and Mr. Hoffman Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 2 one of my favorite stats from Feb Fest always is the number of holes that you drill. So do you have an approximate number that you’re going to? Todd Hoffman: We have an exact number, 1,000. Mayor Ryan: 1,000 awesome. I’m always very impressed. So we hope you can join us. It’s a great event and you know friends and family and people of all ages we’d love to see you on Saturday so thank you to the Park and Rec Commission for all your hard work on that. Next we have, I just want to provide an update on our outdoor rinks and warming house weather policy. Obviously it’s very important in this very cold weather just so everybody has a clear understanding on what our policy is with our rinks Rinks will remain open but ice conditions vary with the weather conditions so they will, we want you to come out and skate but these are the guidelines to determine warming house closures. When the temperatures soften the ice. When the actual or wind chill temperatures reach negative 15 degrees or colder, so that will be this week. And if more than one inch of snow accumulates on the ice when maintenance crews are not available so this policy is on our website so please look for it there. I know it’ been posted on our Facebook page as well but just so there’s no confusion and we want to make sure everybody is safe when they’re out on the ice so come enjoy our great rinks. And one final announcement, I just would like to personally thank our road and trail crews for the great job that they did early this morning in clearing all our streets and trails. I couldn’t believe when I made it to the bus stop at 8:30 this morning and all our trails were already wide open for the kids to get safely to the bus stop for please along our thanks. Todd Gerhardt: We will. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Ryan: Next is our consent agenda. Tonight we have consent agenda items 1 through 4. All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be considered as a single motion based on staff recommendation. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired by anyone on council or here in the chambers you may request to have an item removed and have it considered separately on our agenda this evening. Are there any items that council would like to consider separately? I would. I’d like to remove D(3) and we will address that right after the approval of the consent agenda. With that is there a motion to approve consent agenda items 1, 2 and 4? Councilwoman Coleman: So moved. Mayor Ryan: Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 3 Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated January 14, 2019 2. Resolution #2019-06: Approve Establishment of County State Aid Highway 101 between Pioneer Trail and Lyman Boulevard 4. Resolution #2019-07: Approve Purchase of 2019 CIP Equipment All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. CONSENT AGENDA: 3. APPROVE LAKE ANN PARK EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY. Mayor Ryan: Mr. Gerhardt, is this something that you could talk about please? Todd Gerhardt: The Lake Ann Park expansion feasibility study is broken into several phases and it’s a tool that our park and rec department, Todd Hoffman uses in laying out trails as developments come in so as you looked at the Galpin property this evening you saw some proposed trail layouts of where they would best as a part of that development. So we have expended money out of that feasibility study. We’ve done phase 1 and staff is suggesting you approve phase 1 in the feasibility study not to exceed $10,000 and then if and when the council feels comfortable if part of the Galpin property approval down the line then we would bring that feasibility study for the next phase. So right now what…approve phase 1 of the Lake Ann Park expansion feasibility study. Mayor Ryan: So instead of the $35,000 it would be the $10,000. Todd Gerhardt: Correct. Mayor Ryan: Correct, okay. And I had brought this to Mr. Gerhardt’s attention earlier just because I know earlier tonight we were discussing the Galpin project and nothing has been approved or moved forward so just asked about the approval of what has been spent so far and then in the next, or phase 1 as Mr. Gerhardt pointed out and then as we continue on this process we can approve further funds. So thank you for the clarification Mr. Gerhardt. Is there a motion, is there a motion on this agenda item? Councilwoman Coleman: Do we have to read it out differently with the $10,000? Mayor Ryan: Yes. Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 4 Councilwoman Coleman: Okay. So correct me if I am wrong here. The City Council approves $10,000 for Phase 1 of the 2019 Park and Trail Acquisition and Development Improvement Program Expenditure for Lake Ann Park Expansion Feasibility Study. Mayor Ryan: Perfect. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion and a second. Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves $10,000 for Phase 1 of the 2019 Park and Trail Acquisition and Development Improvement Program Expenditure for Lake Ann Park Expansion Feasibility Study. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE. Mayor Ryan: Next is our monthly fire department and law update. Chief, welcome. Chief Don Johnson: Thank you Mayor and council, good evening. Tonight I’ll talk a little bit about where we’re at with staffing. We’ve got 42 current firefighters. One’s on leave. This year’s hiring cycles started out with quite a bit of interest. We had about 20 applications and once you whittle down the, you actually have to live in Chanhassen. It’s a paid on call department because it starts to weed some of that down a little bit so we actually took about 10 candidates starting through the interview process. They’ve been through oral panel interviews. They’ve been through chief’s interviews. They had a physical agility test and after all of that lined up we ended up offering 6 candidates conditional offers so the still have 3 major steps in their process so it doesn’t mean that we’ll necessarily get 6 out of that but we’ll be sitting pretty well. Two of them were already through school so we like to call them freebee’s because we don’t have to hold onto them for a year and pay for them to go to school so we’re hoping that all 6 can get through the process. Our current set of rookies that are in training are completing their emergency medical technician course work right now which is probably some of the more grueling stuff that they’re going to have to do and that ends in February with the National Certification exam. So I’ll start here with December stats so we went to 101 calls in December which is, I can’t find another month in Chan’s history that we went to that many calls. We finished the year at 921 which now sets the new record for Chanhassen back from 2003 when it ended at 830 calls. The years after that we went to a prioritized medical which actually took the call load down a little bit and we stopped going on what we call band aid runs where we’re in the community and you don’t necessary need the fire department because you’re just not feeling well so that prioritized dispatch hasn’t changed within the last month or two. We’ve had some changes with our CAD system which allows some flexibility in fire departments across Carver County to decide which calls they want to go on and which ones they don’t. It hasn’t changed systemically for us here in Chanhassen but our calls continue to move north. Significant calls in Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 5 December. We had 65 rescue calls which included 7 motor vehicle accidents. Responded to 3 fires. One mutual aid fire in Excelsior. We had an equipment fire at Palm Beach Tan here on West 79th and then a fire in an industrial oven at Robert’s Automatic. Training wrapped up. We had an officers training off leadership development training. We’ve had 2 EMS trainings and then I had the January 14th we had our annual fire department training which we bring in a motivational speaker and do dinner and we actually had, enjoyed that at the Chanhassen Dinner Theater this year which was kind of a prelude to where our banquet will be later in May. The other thing with Don’s been very active, the other Don. Don Nutter, the Fire Marshal has been very active with starting to build some of our fire prevention activities so he actually did CPR and fire extinguisher training for Cortera, one of the businesses here in town. I did the tenant meetings with Summerwood as well as did all their fire extinguisher training for their staff this month and then we’re at Powers Ridge Senior tomorrow doing tenant meetings and set up some fire prevention activities for them. I hope to have a more detailed annual report for you within the next couple of months in regards to all of our activities over December and lay some of that out and I did in the graphics if you look there’s a Councilman McDonald requested some, when do these calls comes in so I also added some graphs and charts based on that so with that I can stand for questions. Mayor Ryan: Perfect thank you. Council any questions? Councilwoman Coleman: Not a question but if I may Chief Johnson, last night in the weather when that pager went off it just reminded me again of how much the men and women at your department do for the city. Getting up in the middle of the night, going out in God’s know what to face God’s know what. And same with law enforcement so I just want to again please along my sincere thank you. Chief Don Johnson: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Alright thank you. Thanks Chief. Chief Don Johnson: You bet, thank you. Mayor Ryan: Lieutenant Kittelson. Lt. Eric Kittelson: Good evening Madam Mayor, council members. I have the annual law enforcement update for you this evening so in the interest of brevity I’ll review the 2018 totals and I’ve included the December, 2018 monthly report for your review. Annual calls for service summary for 2018. We had 523 Group A crimes, 175 Group B crimes, 4,914 miscellaneous non-criminal calls for service, 4,478 total traffic incidents, 582 administrative tasks. Those are mostly permits and background checks and things like that, and these totals represent 10,672 calls for service and traffic stops handled by our deputies annually with an average of 5 calls for service per shift per deputy. The types of incidents most commonly responded to were DUI 54, drug violations 89, theft 185, medicals 1,012, alarm response 561 and suspicious activity 744. Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 6 The busiest day of the week is Monday which for as long as I can remember it had always been Tuesday. For 2018 the busiest day of the week is Monday and the busiest time of day for us is 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Arrest citations and verbal warnings summary. Arrests for 2018, we had 445 individuals were arrested and charged with 641 crimes in 348 separate incidents. Some of the highest offenses per arrest were DUI 54, drug violations 59 and theft and shoplifting 37. We issued 790 citations with the most common violations being speed 246, no proof of insurance 92 and driving after suspension 61. We also issued 2,207 verbal warnings on all violations with 1,858 of those being on traffic stops. Community relations update. Deputies worked a special detail at St. Hubert’s on November 29th. We attended the annual tree lighting ceremony at City Center Park on December 1st. I attended the Southwest Chamber of Commerce General Membership luncheon with city staff on December 19th. Just last week I met with Park Nicollet. Their entire system in Minnesota is doing a collaboration with law enforcement just discussing response and different security issues so I had a meeting with their clinic manager last week. I’ll be meeting with Summerwood on a similar initiative next week and then deputies will be assisting with February Fest events at Lake Ann Park on February 2nd. Our 2019 policing work plan mission is to develop an atmosphere of policing that works in partnership with the community to creatively problem solve and deter crime. Our goal is to coordinate and tailor the delivery of police services in a manner that is aligned with city and county core values, goals and strategies and just a few of the methods that we’ll utilize is to identify regular opportunities for quality, constructive engagement with the public at community events. The deputies will assist in planning, coordinating, and attending events such as February Fest, July 4th, National Night Out just to name a few and we work very closely with Todd’s staff for those events and they do a phenomenal job. We’ll work collaboratively with the City Community Service officers to utilize the city’s speed signs to confirm neighborhood speeding concerns and respond with follow up patrol if warranted and we’ll maintain our neighborhood vitality and a sense of safety through consistent follow up to calls for service through the continuance of the community policing project that we implemented in 2017. And just as a reminder winter parking. On street parking is prohibited by Chanhassen City Ordinance between November 1st and April between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. On street parking is also prohibited when there are 2 inches or more of snow on a street until the street has been plowed from curb to curb. And that concludes my report. I will stand for questions. Mayor Ryan: Great thank you Lieutenant. Council any questions, comments? Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council. At our next work session Eric Kittelson will be giving both the mayor and council an update on the 5 year history of law enforcement activity in the community. This is something I’ve been asking for for a while. What it does is it compares from year to year and gives you a good background on the activities that our law enforcement have engaged in and any trends that they might see in developing our annual work plan. So Eric will give… Lt. Eric Kittelson: Yes and if I may, so if some of you recall so we went to NIBRS which is National Incident Based Reporting System which is actually required by the FBI. Will be implemented everywhere I believe by 2020. We were a pilot project for this and started this July Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 7 1, 2016 and so these 5 year stats we’re going from summary based report to national incident based reporting. There are now one major changes that drug crime is not a victimless crime. It’s now counted as a crime against society so it does things to our numbers that we need to analyze and it’s taken us some time so I put together a report that will combine Group 1, or Type 1 and Type 2 crimes and Group A and Group B crimes to a point where it will make sense with limited interpretation at this point so it will be a document that’s being submitted to Mr. Gerhardt’s staff that is a 5 year crime trend analysis and comprehensive exam of all crime in the city. It took us a long time to get there but it’s a document that I think you’ll be able to reference for some time. Todd Gerhardt: It’s our largest contract that the City entertains and as a part of that it shows you what we’re buying as a part of that contract. There’s sub-sets to the contract. We brought in the Drug Task Force element at our last meeting to give you some background on what the Drug Task Force does. Eric is going to show you what the detectives have been working on. How many cases they’ve opened and closed and investigated over the last several years and also I’ve added prosecution portion to Eric’s overall presentation because what the prosecutor does is takes those misdemeanors that the deputies write and determines if they are worth investigating and taking through the court process. In some cases there’s just not enough information to prosecute so it will talk about open and closed cases. Sometimes these cases will linger into 2 or 3 years so there’s no real correlation of open and closed cases but it shows you how many cases that Eric’s team has sent over to Roger’s office to be prosecuted and also how many cases that Roger’s office has closed and also a comparison of the cost benefit of working with Roger’s office versus working with Carver County’s prosecutor. Lt. Eric Kittelson: Yeah misdemeanor FTE is hard to capture if you look at it the wrong way because detectives open and close cases that take months or years sometimes they remain open and so as Todd mentioned Mr. Knutson’s staff will have statistics of all the misdemeanor cases that they’ve prosecuted. What I did in my report, and I think Mr. Knetsch will have the other report, is if you look at the police contract there’s a separate line item for misdemeanor investigator so I took the numbers of cases that they closed and that were assigned to them. Or I’m sorry, the cases that were closed and cleared because if we do the cases that were assigned to them in a year it’s not going to make sense because a case assigned on December 21, 2018 will potentially be closed in March of 2019 or we might have a warrant for DNA that is out there until a suspect is developed so it could be years and so the most accurate way to look at it would be, because we do also assign and that’s what Sergeant Breunig, one of his main functions is, is he reviews all calls for service and all cases in Chanhassen and then he assigns them appropriately to the misdemeanor investigator. That’s going to take more time to develop or he’ll assign it to an on duty deputy so I didn’t, those numbers are already represented in the calls for service so I didn’t include those. I wanted to separate those out so you know what that separate line item in the contract, what you’re getting for that essentially. Mayor Ryan: Alright. Todd Gerhardt: So what Eric and I are telling you is. Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 8 Lt. Eric Kittelson: We did a good job. Todd Gerhardt: It’s very thorough. Todd Gerhardt: It’s not always going to be apples to apples when you look at or average but we’re going to do our best to explain each to you but the key thing is, is that they’re out there patrolling. They’re not sitting around and you can see that based on the activities hours. Mayor Ryan: Great well thank you. Look forward to that report. You said next. Lt. Eric Kittelson: February 11th. Mayor Ryan: At our next work session. Todd Gerhardt: February 11th. Mayor Ryan: February 11th, great. Look forward to that. Todd Gerhardt: And Elliott also will be here. Mayor Ryan: Okay perfect. Todd Gerhardt: You’ll get a chance to him. Mayor Ryan: Great, thank you Lieutenant. Lt. Eric Kittelson: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Appreciate it. PUBIC HEARING: ORCHARD LANE AREA STREET & UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT-ADOPT ASSESSMENT ROLL AND AWARD CONTRACT. Mayor Ryan: The first item I believe is Mr. Oehme. The Orchard Lane and street and utility reconstruction project. Mr. Oehme. Paul Oehme: Thank you Mayor, City Council members. So tonight staff would like to have the council consider holding an assessment hearing and awarding the contract for the 2018 Orchard Lane area street improvement project. So the project is located on the north side of Lake Minnewashta. It’s about .7 miles worth of streets that we’d like to have considered for improvement. This is the last section of neighborhood that, on the north side of Lake Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 9 Minnewashta that needs reconstruction so over the last I think 8 years we’ve been reconstructing all these neighborhoods annually. This is the, showing the streets that we’d like to have reconstructed. They include Orchard Lane, Forest Avenue, Forest Circle, Oriole Avenue and 64th Street and the numbers that are shown on each of these segments of roadway, that’s pavement condition index so that’s the rating that the, we have put on each of these sections of roadway for the pavement condition so the rating goes from 100 which is basically a brand new street down to zero which is basically a gravel street so the streets segments here are shown in more half to scale for the pavement condition. So they are considered in need of the reconstruction area. So with that a little background on the street and the neighborhood itself. Orchard Lane and the areas around it were constructed in 1974 and most of the utilities were put in at that same time. The water and the sanitary sewer improvements. 64th Street is a little bit different. That was built a little later in 1988. Little different pavement section. Little different pavement condition. And then the, again the OCI ranges for these areas are between 13 and 36 for the Orchard area and anything we say below a 45 range, grades pavement section is considered for reconstruction. That means that the pavement has deteriorated to such a point that minor maintenance techniques such as sealcoat or just patching, oil patches really not cost effective at this time. Here’s just a couple photos of some of the pavements in the area. So you can see Orchard Lane has been patched several times. The edge of the pavement is starting to alligator just because of the weights of the traffic that’s going through the neighborhood. 64th Street is alligatored. Really difficult to sealcoat that type of street with this condition. Forest Circle, Orchard Avenue again these are heavily alligatored. Black cracking and heavy patched. So what the city staff is proposing to reconstruct the streets and what we’ve done in the other neighborhoods is digging down and replacing the entire pavement section so the proposed pavement section would be 18 inches of basically sand section to help drain the pavement section so it doesn’t get into the asphalt. 10 inches of aggregate gravel basically on top of that for stabilization and then you’d have 4 inches of asphalt on top of that. Included in the pavement design would be 4 inches, a 4 inch drain tile on each edge of the pavement section. That would direct water away from the pavement section for longevity and also it allows homeowners to tie into that drain tile if they have sump pump discharges in the front of their house they can tie into that so it doesn’t run into our street or into our curb and potentially freeze during the winter months. The pavement width of the roads is going to vary. We tried to match the existing pavement width for each of the streets that are out there so, and that’s basically the curb line that’s shown here. We are proposing the surmountable curb. The concrete surmountable curb that we have put in in several other neighborhoods to match those areas as well. It seems like the property owners seem to approve that curb type. So we also, staff has also looked at the, all the utilities in this area. There’s only one documented watermain break in this area off of Forest Avenue. However the watermain in this area is cast iron and again it was constructed in 1974 and it’s very susceptible to breaks, especially this time of year. So what we’d like to do is replace that watermain with a PVC pipe that’s, we’ve standardized our watermain pipe width. And then also the watermain that would go underneath the street we’d have to tie into that with copper services to each of the new properties. Each of the properties and replace the curb stops at the property line as well so everything within the right-of-way in terms of the water would be replaced. The City has also televised all the sanitary sewer pipes in the neighborhood. There are Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 10 3 areas that are being proposed for replacement from a manhole little section. These areas can’t be lined or improved without digging that section up. Particularly their bellies and they’re holding water then they can hold debris and then potentially have clogging issues so we’d like to address those issues as long as we have the streets torn up. And then also with the manholes we’ll also be routing some of the manholes and some of the leaking joints that we’ve identified in the area and then also including I and I barriers with the manholes as well so that water that potentially is sitting next to the manholes doesn’t get into the sanitary sewer system. Staff has looked at several options for storm sewer improvements in this area. Again the roads are rural section roads so the water just sheet flows off into the neighbor’s yards and kind of goes, meanders where it wants so with that curb and gutter we want to put in a robust storm sewer system so the green line here is basically showing the new storm sewer system that we’d be constructing. A lot of the storm sewer would be along Orchard Lane and Forest Avenue as well. A lot of storm sewer again on Orchard as well to capture that storm water before it ends up in people’s yards and direct it so we can treat the water as well. So one of the treatment options that we’ve looked at is to install rain gardens. This is a rendering of a rain garden that we’re proposing at a corner of Oriole and Orchard. We do, we did work with the property owner on this property to acquire an easement to make the improvements so we’d like to treat the water in the rain garden before it discharges into the lakes and streams in the area so the water that would come off of the streets again would be directed into the rain gardens. Potentially sit there and infiltrate for up to 24 hours and discharge at a lower rate into the existing storm sewer system in the area. So that’s a brief background on the scope of the project. Staff did solicit bids for this project and we did open bids on December 13th. We did receive 6 bids from local contractors. The bids were tabulated and checked for accuracy. The engineer’s estimate from WSB was a little over $2 million dollars. The lowest responsible bidder was from Northwest Asphalt out of Shakopee at a little over $1.987 million dollars. Northwest Asphalt has worked in the city of Chanhassen before and most recently in the rehabilitation project in 2016 and 2017. So with street improvement projects we do have an assessment practice that the City follows so the practice in general is to assess 40 percent of the street cost back to the benefiting property owners. We do not assess for utilities such as watermain, sanitary and storm sewer improvements. That would come out of the utility funds. So looking at the improvements associated with Orchard Lane, Oriole Avenue, Forest Circle and then Forest Avenue the total estimated assessment cost is a little over $7,800. Again that’s based upon the bid that we received back in December from Northwest Asphalt. So if you take that number, take 40 percent of that and it’s a little over $283,000. Divide that up amongst the 36 units that are associated or abut, have driveways on these 4 streets, the total assessment amount comes to $7,876.89 per unit. With that the terms of the assessment is proposed over a 10 year period with an interest rate of 7.25 percent. That’s based upon prime rate plus 2 percent. The last, or the other section of street proposed for assessment is 64th Street is a little bit different section of pavement that we’re looking at here that we’re not completing a whole reconstruction. This is more of a mill up the existing pavement and so some corrections and repave the streets so it’s a little bit different assessment calculation. So on 64th Street a total cost for the street section is a little over $97,000 and taking that number and looking at the 40 percent assessment amount is $38,000 and there’s 12 units on 64th Street. That comes to a proposed assessment of $3,238.54. Again the terms of Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 11 the assessment if the property owners so choose to pay it off over time and put it on their taxes would be a 10 year timeframe with 7.25 percent interest rate. Again that’s prime rate plus 2 percent. So the feasibility study, going back and looking at what the feasibility study said this is the total estimated cost was $2.296 million dollars which is very close to what the bids came in at. Looking at the improvement cost from the bids that we received versus the budget amount in our CIP, the totals are shown here. Again these are the total assessment amounts. A little over $322,000. The revolving assessment would pay for 60 percent of the City’s cost and again that comes out of the revolving assessment amount and we budgeted about $1.5 million dollars for that. The watermain improvements are a little over $585,000. That would come out of the water utility fund. The sanitary sewer costs for replacements of the sanitary sewer would come out of the sanitary sewer enterprise fund and the storm sewer improvements would come out of the storm sewer utility funds so a little over $353,000 for a total improvement cost of $2.271 million dollars. This, these improvement costs do include the engineering cost that we had with a consultant. We also include the surveying costs that we have in the construction survey. It also includes… That roughly involved 11 percent of the total bid price. So here’s a schedule of what we’ve completed to date and if this project were to move forward we anticipate construction so we did have a neighborhood meeting in January 17th. We did have 3 representatives from the neighborhood attend. All the neighbors being proposed for assessments were invited to the meeting. Tonight we are, we would like to hold the assessment hearing in consideration of the bids. And then if the project were to move forward we’d like to start the project some time in April right after road restrictions or right at road restrictions and then we’d like to have substantial completion of the project early September. The final wear course of the project would be in 2020. So with that I’d be willing to stand for questions. The assessment hearing or I request that an assessment hearing be held at this time. To date the City has, staff has not received any objections to the assessment amount and our typical practice is if, that assessments, objections to assessments after the assessment hearing are not valid so we’re looking for an assessment objection before the public or the assessment hearing is closed. So with that I’d stand for questions and again request that an assessment hearing be opened at this time. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Mr. Oehme. Before I open the public hearing are there any questions of council? Councilwoman Coleman: I have one. Yes I was wondering, I know you mentioned 3 members of the community came out for the neighborhood meeting. Has there been any other feedback via phone or email from people impacted by the assessment? Paul Oehme: We have had calls over the last couple months from property owners asking questions about the assessment. Specifically more towards the project itself. Storm sewer improvements that we’re proposing. That was one of the questions. One of the, when we had the public hearing we had one gentleman stand up and ask about his oak tree that was in the right-of-way so we’re definitely have been in contact with him and working around that oak tree to make sure that the project would impact that oak. Those are basically the questions that we’ve Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 12 had. Overall the property owners have been supportive of the project and I think most of them would like to see the project go forward. Councilwoman Coleman: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Any other questions? I have a couple Mr. Oehme. Just for clarification with Oriole Avenue getting the full reconstruction and then the 64th getting partial, how do you make that transition? Are you connecting then the new curb and gutter or what does that transition look like? Paul Oehme: Yep it’s a good question. So what we do in both the reconstruction area and the overlay area we would be having the contractor mill up these areas for the roads and the pavement so the streets themselves, as you can see the 64th Street here that already has the curb and gutter, that’s the same type of curb that we’re looking at for the other areas on Orchard and Oriole. So the transition when the streets are going to be completed you really won’t see that there’s much difference between the neighborhoods. Between the streets in terms of design and layout of the street. The construction itself is going to be a lot different because say Orchard we’re going to be digging up and replacing the watermain so this whole section here is going to be completely removed and we’re going to replace that whole section where on 64th Street we’re just going to grind up the asphalt. We’re going to actually use that as base if we find any soft spots within the paving section itself we’re going to dig those out and use the RAF or the recycled asphalt as stabilizing the aggregate so there’s two different techniques for construction and, but overall after the project is complete you really won’t notice the difference between the two neighborhoods or two streets. Mayor Ryan: And thank you, and with that I guess they’re all somewhat like similar in terms of access and road closures and with, how will they get around? I mean there’s no alternative route to their homes. Paul Oehme: Exactly so that’s a good point so we do have a construction staging plan. You know we’re not going to be opening up all the streets at one time so we’re going to allow the contractor to do a couple sections of the project at first and allow the other neighborhoods that aren’t going to be worked on to be completed at a later date and then move to that next section when the first section of the neighborhood is more or less put back together. At least that gravel section so we do have a staging plan. We always work with the neighborhoods and we let them know how and when the project’s going to start and it’s going to be impacting their neighborhoods and their property. We do use the website for communication. The inspector gives out their cell phone to all the neighbors so if they have any questions on a day to day, hour to hour basically they can always get in contact with them…for those type of questions as well. Mayor Ryan: Okay. And that was a great lead in to my next question which I’m sure you anticipated because I asked it back in December, or at the last meeting is in terms of the communication. I know there was some challenges on the Minnewashta Manor project and I Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 13 know a lot of it had to do with weather and the delays and the movement of some utilities I think was part of the issue so how, just a commitment in terms of communication and updating the website. I know that was some of the frustration was you know going to the website and not having that. To make sure that they have a contact so that they can be in touch when there are these road closures. Paul Oehme: Right yep, exactly. So again we allow, well we have the inspector’s phone number, cell number on the website. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Paul Oehme: We have the city staff, engineering staff’s numbers on the website. For example last year’s project was really difficult just because of the weather that we had and things changed from week to week sometimes and the contractor you know didn’t know if he was going to be there one week just because the soil conditions were so bad we had to postpone some of that work just to get access and replace some of the watermain specifically so you know we always strive or we try to do our best for allowing for notifying the neighbors with that communication so you know there’s always room for improvement but we do our best to make sure that the website’s updated you know as much as we can when we get the information from the contractor. One thing we did do on this project was proactively approach the gas company on if they could move and relocate some of that gas main in this area because that was one of the biggest struggles we had with the last project was the gas main was in the way. They took forever to move that gas main and there were some problems associated with that so that really delayed that project so we did have the contractor last fall replace and relocate the gas main out of our way. There’s still some other smaller utilities that have to get relocated but the biggest one, the biggest hurdle we had in the last project was the gas…addressed under this project. Mayor Ryan: Perfect. And my last question. The rain garden that you spoke of, it says number one so is there a number two? And was that part of the easement acquisition that was mentioned in the packet? Paul Oehme: Yes. Mayor Ryan: And so then who’s responsibility is the rain garden? Will it be the City or will it be the property owner? Paul Oehme: Yep so the rain garden would be, like we have on other projects would be the City’s responsibility to take care of that rain garden since this is a public improvement and we have to work with the watershed district and try to do our best to infiltrate and to try to treat the water before it leaves the site so this is, this is the improvement that we’re, that we’ve completed in the past and it seems to work. We do contract out annually for maintenance of these rain gardens… There is only one rain garden that’s proposed. There was a bioswale, kind of an underground system that was proposed down by the park. Unfortunately we got into final design Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 14 and the grade and soils out here really didn’t lend itself to putting a bioswale in this area so what we’re doing now is having the sump manhole and the SAFL baffle basically treating that water in the manhole before it discharges into the wetland. That’s the watershed district defines that. Mayor Ryan: Mr. Gerhardt wants you to repeat what that was. Paul Oehme: The SAFL baffle. It is a SAFL baffle so yeah so we do have a couple of those going into the project. One in the park. Herman Park and then there’s another one off of Orchard as well and I think, yeah there is another one up by the rain garden as well too. Todd Gerhardt: We have them farther west on the same street. Paul Oehme: We do. We have several in the last neighborhood that we constructed as well so those are sump manholes that catch the fine particulates before it discharges into the wetlands and the ponds and it allows access, easy access for our maintenance crew to suck out that debris and that sediment in the street before it ends up in the wetlands and ponds so it’s, we’ve put in a lot of these in recent improvement projects and they have been very successful. Mayor Ryan: Perfect thank you. I appreciate your answers. Todd Gerhardt: It means St. Anthony Falls, oh gosh now. Filtration? Paul Oehme: I’ll get back to you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Alright, with no further questions. Todd Gerhardt: I just want to make a point. Mayor Ryan: Oh sure. Todd Gerhardt: We talked about 64th Street. It already has curb and gutter. Paul talked about mill and overlay. If you go into the assessment roll you notice all the homes that are in on 64th Street, their assessments are typical with a mill and overlay. Not a total reconstruction. They’re in the range of $3,238 so when you don’t have curb and gutter you usually pay for curb and gutter the first time so they had curb and gutter. They’re just paying for the mill and overlay so I wanted to make that point. And then there’s also an assessment for $15,000. That individual has two lots is why it’s 15. If you divide it by 2 it comes out at the $7,876. Mayor Ryan: Perfect. Thank you. Therefore I’ll open the public hearing. Nobody is here so, pardon me? Could I get a motion to close the public hearing? Councilman Campion: So moved. Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 15 Mayor Ryan: Is there a second? Councilwoman Coleman: Second. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The public hearing was closed. Mayor Ryan: I’ll bring it back to council for questions, comments or action. Councilman Campion: I’ll make a motion. Mayor Ryan: Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: The City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids and awards the contract for the Orchard Lane Area Street and Utility Reconstruction Project Number 18-01 to Northwest Asphalt Inc. in the amount of $1,987,011.56, and the City Council adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Orchard Lane Area Street and Utility Reconstruction Project Number 18-01. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Coleman: Second it. Resolution #2019-08: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids and awards the contract for the Orchard Lane Area Street and Utility Reconstruction Project No. 18-01 to Northwest Asphalt Inc. in the amount of $1,987,011.56; and Resolution #2019-09: to adopt a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Orchard Lane Area Street and Utility Reconstruction Project No. 18-01. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Ryan: That motion passes 5-0. Thank you. APPROVE VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AT 3790 LONE CEDAR LANE. Mayor Ryan: Next Mr. Oehme is this you as well? Paul Oehme: Yes. Mayor Ryan: Alright. Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 16 Mayor Ryan: If you could provide a staff report please. Paul Oehme: Let me bring up the slide show. Mayor Ryan: Alright. Paul Oehme: So thank you Madam Mayor and City Council members. This is a proposed vacation for a drainage and utility easement at 3790 Lone Cedar Avenue. So Lone Cedar Avenue is just south of Lake Minnewashta, north of Highway 5 and the properties in question are the last two properties on Lone Cedar Lane. The easement in question that’s proposed for the vacation is located right between Lots 1 and 2. This property has recently been sold and the property owner, current property owner owns both lots. So again the drainage and utility easement was dedicated back in the original plat in 1962 between two lots shown here in a little bit more detail. It’s a 10 foot wide drainage and utility easement on both sides of the parcel line. The City does not have any utilities, water or sanitary sewer in this easement and there are no private utilities in this easement as well such as gas or electric and those type of easements so we did talk to the DNR, or contacted the DNR for this easement if they had any concerns for the vacation. They actually sent a letter back today, late this afternoon saying they didn’t have any issues with the vacation of this easement so, so staff’s in support of dedication. Kate Aanenson: Can I just give a little background on that too? Paul Oehme: Yep. Kate Aanenson: There was two lots of record. Can you just go back a little bit. So this, Lots 1 and 2, they were two lots of record and so the applicant on that lot actually got a variance to put a garage on that second lot so to vacate the easement allows him to use it, which we were excited about as opposed to having a house that close to Highway 5 and it did have access so it’s really a better use of the property so that’s why we did support the variance and this is the last part of the condition of that variance was to get the vacation of the easement. Mayor Ryan: So are they done with any construction on the property? Kate Aanenson: They have to wait, yeah. Mayor Ryan: It will be a garage. Kate Aanenson: Yep it will be a garage but they had to get, they had to vacate the easement first in order to build a garage because they want to move it closer to the house. Mayor Ryan: Okay, perfect. Paul Oehme: Over the easement. Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 17 Kate Aanenson: Correct, yep so it makes it closer. Correct. Mayor Ryan: Gotch ya, perfect. Thank you. Paul Oehme: So with that the staff’s in support of the vacation of the easement so, and we’d request that a public hearing be opened at this time for consideration of the vacation. Mayor Ryan: Perfect. Thank you Mr. Oehme. Any questions from council before I open the public hearing? Alright I hereby open the public hearing. No comments. Could I get a motion to close the public hearing please? Councilman Campion: So moved. Mayor Ryan: Is there a second? Councilwoman Coleman: Second it. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The public hearing was closed. Mayor Ryan: I again bring it back to council for any questions, comment or action please. Councilman Campion: I’ll make a motion. Mayor Ryan: Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: The City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of public drainage and utility easements on Lot 1 and 2, Block 1 of Cedar Crest plat. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Coleman: Second. Resolution #2019-10: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of public drainage and utility easements dedicated as follows: 1. The westerly 10.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, CEDAR CREST, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota (P.I.D. No. 251700010); and 2. The easterly 10.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, CEDAR CREST, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota (P.I.D. No. 251700020). Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 18 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Ryan: That motion carries 5-0. Alright next we have no new business however everybody was so kind in not calling me out that I didn’t go through the visitor presentation so I was hoping not to make a mistake but I breezed through that. There was nobody in the chambers to, for the visitor presentation so I apologize for that but I did want to point out, we spoke about it at the January 14th meeting about the new visitor presentation process. As part of the emphasize on communication that we talked about at the last meeting we are implementing a new way to go about managing requests as they are presented during the visitor presentation portion of the meeting. So if you come forward and your request includes an action item from staff or council we would like to complete a Citizen Action Request form, and I think that’s on the monitor now. What it looks like. So this can be done in one of two ways. It can either be completed in council chambers the evening that you are making a request. There’ll be hard copies available or it may be completed online. The link to the form is part of our agenda and can be, and will be submitted accordingly and so Councilwoman Tjornhom asked me at the last meeting about if, if you’re just making a comment do you have to fill out a form so I just want to clarify again that if you’re just making a comment or here for a presentation the form does not need to be completed. And the reason for this new process is to ensure that your requests are clearly understood by both staff and council and that there is follow up and follow through and for transparency reasons the completed citizen action request form will be included in the correspondence section as part of the following meeting. So after, at the next meeting if you look at the correspondence packet that request form will be in there and it will show what action has been taken and whether or not the request has been completed or further discussion is required. So thank you for getting that form out there. I appreciate it and look forward to having that communication with the residents. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan: Going forward you know we have a lot of council members that sit on different boards and community, different commissions or boards and go to various meetings as representatives of council and so I had asked that if you are at one of those meetings to utilize this opportunity to share, share what happened at your meeting or at that commission so if anybody had attended a meeting or a board meeting of some sort if you have an update we’d appreciate it. Councilman McDonald: Madam Mayor. I’m on the Southwest Transit Board representing the City and at our last meeting we approved our budget for 2019. We also kind of looked at what our goals and summaries are going to be for the coming year and one of the things that Southwest is trying to do is, it’s a micro transit solution. What that means is we started the prime movement about 3 years ago and that has since taken on some national importance. In fact I was at a meeting this morning down at the State Legislature and that’s one of the big things that they’re interested in is how do we get transit to everybody so that it’s usable and affordable and Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 19 what Southwest has been doing over the past 3 years has now become a model for doing that. Southwest called it their prime approach. We’re now looking at going to what’s called a prime medical which will only handle, much like the fire department. We’ve been overwhelmed by I think calls and now what we’ve tried to do is break them down into medical calls and just taking people to the mall shopping. If they have to go someplace to pick up something you know to get prescriptions so the medical will allow more or less, we can now take someone to their doctor’s office. To the hospital. Wherever they need to go for their clinic and that way they’re not part of this other chain where we’re picking up people and taking people to a number of different places so this is a new concept and everybody’s kind of interested in how it’s going to work. There’s a lot of interest I think within the state as to what the opt out’s have been doing. What we do as far as service and what Southwest has constantly tried to do is how do we better improve transit opportunities for the communities that we serve so we’re looking at a number of innovative practices to go forward with that and you know that was part of what our budget reflects is to be able to do all of those types of jobs. The other commission I’m serving on is Beyond the Yellow Ribbon. Not a lot has happened there in the past couple of months. We haven’t been hit with any big needs at this point but you know we’re always ready to do something. We act as kind of a clearinghouse to either get people in touch with agencies that can provide what the need is or we can try to do fundraising. One of the best examples was a couple years ago. There was a mother in the community who’s son was graduating out of boot camp down at Fort Jackson and she had no way to get down there so we went around, raised some money. Got her an airline ticket. Got her a hotel room. Provided for transportation back and forth from the hotel so we an do those kind of things for veterans and I think one of the things that we’re always asking the public to do is, we’re here. Just contact us and you know we’ll try to get resources together to address whatever the need is for the particular veteran or their family. And that’s pretty much it. That’s the two committees I work on. Mayor Ryan: Great, thank you Mr. McDonald. Could I ask a follow up question for your transit? Councilman McDonald: Sure. Mayor Ryan: So the, I’m sure the interest in the prime medical is huge so what is the timeline or how is this going to be implemented and what are you waiting for in terms of next steps? Councilman McDonald: Well it’s going to be rolled out this year and the problem that we’re having, which is what we talked to the State about is capital funding to buy these vehicles. You’re not using a bus. What you’re using in most cases, they call them a cut away but it’s like a regular van only a little bit bigger because again you’ve got passenger seats but those are not cheap and what we did for prime is we went out and got a lot of Metro Mobility’s vehicles that were already beyond their life and we refurbished them and all like this and used them to prove the concept and now we’re starting to get some attention from again it’s as far away as New Zealand has asked us how the program works but it’s really, it comes down to the software you use and again it’s the dedication of, it’s like a Lyft or an Uber. We go right to the house to pick Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 20 people up. You can’t do that with a big bus so it’s trying to get transportation to those members of the community. What’s holding it up is again trying to get the funding to buy these new vehicles. We’ve got some funding to take care of some vehicles this year and we’ll convert a couple of them to be able to do this new service and we’ll see how it goes from there. Mayor Ryan: Great, thank you. Councilman Campion: I have a question too. Councilman McDonald: Sure. Councilman Campion: So is prime going away and being replaced with the prime medical or they’re both? Councilman McDonald: No it’s going to be both. Councilman Campion: Okay. Councilman McDonald: Again they’re two customer bases that you look at using and by having prime medical you can now call up and you know if you’re wheelchair bound or if you need special assistance we can now dedicate those services to that particular run. Councilman Campion: Okay cool. Mayor Ryan: Perfect thank you. Anybody else? I would like to just highlight one of the meetings that Mr. Gerhardt and I attended at the Carver County Leaders Meeting. We spent a significant amount of time on the opioid crisis facing Carver County. They brought in a woman from the Minnesota Department of Health to talk about overdose prevention and went through a resources dashboard and shared with us that that, the Department of Health is rolling out to address, it gives different statistics. It provides resources but it really just speaks to the crisis that we’re facing obviously as a nation but particularly in Carver County and not only the State and the County but locally ways you can get information and address this very scary crisis facing our community so you can go to Minnesota Department of Health and look for the resources dashboard on their website and it’s a great tool to use so really appreciated that update. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan: Next are there any administrative presentations? Todd Gerhardt: I have a couple Mayor and council members. Councilmember Coleman thanked the volunteer fire department for their efforts going out in the cold weather. I’d also like to extend my appreciation to our utility department that worked until 1:30 last night on a watermain break. It was long after dealing with the watermain break then they jumped into their plow Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 21 trucks and started plowing so it was a long early morning for those gentlemen. And I also want to extend my appreciation to Paul Oehme our Public Works Director who has decided to resign his position and become the Public Works Director for the City of Lakeville. I’ve been harassing Paul for the last 2 weeks since he’s announced this and because I still haven’t accepted the fact that he’s leaving me after 15 years. But Paul it’s truly that I appreciate everything that you’ve done here. Tonight is a perfect example. You just assessed probably close to 35 homes and nobody’s here to contest it and so credit to you and your staff for doing such a fantastic job and helping reinvest into our infrastructure. I know Todd Hoffman’s going to miss you because his parks will be saved and but again you’ve done a fabulous job in investing our citizen’s money tax money into our infrastructure and you should be very proud of that as we are for your efforts. Paul Oehme: City Council members thanks Todd for those kind words and I just wanted to say that it wasn’t an easy decision at all. There’s so many valuable friends and acquaintances that I’ve met in the city and Todd has a really strong and a great staff to work with so it’s just something that from a career opportunity it just seems like it was the right thing to do. I know the City will be in good hands with the next Public Works Director. Todd Gerhardt: Well they’ve got big shoes to fill and Justin is off my Christmas list so he’ll no longer be receiving Christmas Cards from me. He used to the Assistant here, City Manager but no he’ll still get Christmas Cards. Mayor Ryan: Well I will echo that comment, Mr. Oehme we’re very sad to see you go. In the last 4 years I’ve certainly enjoyed working with you. You’ve been, I know just great to work with from a resident standpoint but for me personally the many phone calls and emails and quick response. You know weekends, early mornings, night time is when I’ve emailed you with a question from a resident you’ve always been quick to respond and mostly I appreciate you sitting there while I pepper you with questions so, and always have good answers and if you don’t have an answer you’re, you look it up and get an answer and response so I will, we will definitely miss you at the City but wish you much success in your next endeavor and adventure. So thank you for your service and commitment to the City. Paul Oehme: Thank you very much. You do have me for one more council meeting. Mayor Ryan: Well then we’ll thank you again. Todd Hoffman: Maybe there’s something you don’t know. Todd Gerhardt: We don’t expect much out of your Paul. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. Mayor Ryan: Anything else in the correspondence discussion? Chanhassen City Council – January 28, 2019 22 Todd Gerhardt: There is the, the Mayor and I did attend the 276 Leaders Meeting and Dr. Peterson shared the school district’s legislative position statements, very similar to our legislative position paper that was handed out earlier and if you have any questions regarding that list don’t hesitate to call me. He was gracious enough to share that with the surrounding 276 community leaders and mayors and city managers. Mayor Ryan: Perfect. I think that’s it so if I could get a motion for adjournment please. Councilman Campion: So moved. Mayor Ryan: Is there a second? Councilwoman Coleman: Second. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 28, 2019 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman, Roger Knutson, and Chief Don Johnson PUBLIC PRESENT: Jon and Mary Beth Hebeisen 2150 Majestic Way Steve Ach Lennar Gerard Snover Comerica B&T Jon Rausch 5229 Minnetoga Terrace Tim McCotter 7000 Utica Lane Josh Kimber 2060 Majestic Way Jon Tietz Planning Commission Cole Kelly Park and Recreation Commission REPRESENTATIVE KELLY MORRISON (VERBAL PRESENTATION). Mayor Ryan congratulated Kelly Morrison on being newly elected to the State Legislature. Kelly Morrison provided background information on being a physician, her family and committees that she serves on. Todd Gerhardt provided information on the population make up, school districts, roadway system, and development projects in the city of Chanhassen. Mayor Ryan discussed the City’s legislative priorities. GALPIN SITE PLAN UPDATE. Mayor Ryan provided background information on this item being presented before the Planning Commission on January 15th and asked for council feedback prior to the item appearing before the City Council on February 11th. Kate Aanenson provided background information that pertains to this property and how development could proceed taking into account land use, zoning, the Park Master Plan, and density transfer. Todd Hoffman discussed the action taken by the Park and Recreation Commission voting 7-0 in approval of the preliminary plat. Steve Ach introduced Jon Rausch, broker and Gerry Snover with Comerica Bank who were present to answer any questions before reviewing the planning process Lennar went through in coming up with concept plans and the preliminary plat that was presented to the Planning Commission. He discussed Lennar taking into account comments received from council members, commission City Council Work Session – January 28, 2019 2 members and residents who attended the neighborhood meetings. Councilman Campion asked if the question raised by Commissioner Tietz at the Planning Commission meeting regarding the number of lots being transferred is accurate. Steve Ach explained how Lennar looked at the density transfer relating to the property that could be built along Lake Ann and the benefit to the City receiving 50 acres of parkland around Lake Ann. Mayor Ryan asked about the challenges dealing with the grade changes in relation to the density transfer numbers and if the properties along the lake are actually buildable because of access through the wetlands. Steve Ach discussed the other option for Lennar could be moving forward with straight zoning rather than PUD-R in order to do the engineering to determine the accurate number of lots that could be developed along the lake. Councilman McDonald discussed his experience with developing properties such as this and the trade off needed to get the 50 acres of parkland. He stated he did not want to get into a fight over density transfer numbers. Mayor Ryan continued by asking the developer to be sensitive to transition with adjoining neighborhoods, the use of a conservation easement along the north property line, concerns voiced by residents along the southern property line and the fact that there wasn’t a follow up meeting with the neighbors regarding conservation concerns along the south property line. Steve Ach explained the need to address drainage issues associated with the plan and that Lennar will revisit the density along the south. Mayor Ryan asked for clarification regarding the requirements for ponding from Carver County associated with the upgrade of Galpin Boulevard in the future. Councilwoman Tjornhom explained that her thoughts are the priority to preserve the parkland around Lake Ann for the entire community and the need for the City and the developer to work together to make this a premier development. Councilman Campion appreciated that there have been improvements to the plan, especially on the north side but did not feel good about giving concessions to the north and squeezing the south boundary. He also would like engineering to be done to validate the density transfer numbers. Jerry Snover, Comerica Bank and Trust explained the parameters outlined by the City and the Comprehensive Plan used by the bank in order to broker and develop this property for the Estate to it’s highest and best use. Mayor Ryan closed by thanking Comerica and Lennar for their work and acknowledged the parameters they are working under but asked that they keep in mind the needs of the residents and citizens of Chanhassen to make this development unique and special. She challenged the developer to show the council innovative plans regarding design, transitions and buffers when it comes back before the city council on February 11th. FINALIZE 2019 KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGIES. Todd Gerhardt discussed the results of the rankings for the key financial strategies and how staff will address priorities ranked 1 and 2. In discussing consideration of implementation a lodging tax staff stated they would be in contact with Vernelle Clayton. Mayor Ryan stated the storm and retention pond review can be removed because staff is already doing that. Paul Oehme explained the practice for addressing citizens request for traffic safety concerns. The work session was recessed at 7:00 p.m. It was reconvened at 8:20 p.m. City Council Work Session – January 28, 2019 3 CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION TO FINALIZE 2019 KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGIES. Todd Gerhardt and Paul Oehme continued with discussion of finalizing 2019 key financial strategies regarding the study of inflow and infiltration initiatives. Mayor Ryan asked for clarification on how future engineering and public work items will be handled with the resignation of Paul Oehme. Todd Gerhardt asked council how they want to proceed with items ranking higher than 2 such as consideration of establishing a EDA Commission. Mayor Ryan, Councilman Campion and Councilwoman Coleman voiced support for establishing a EDA commission. Councilman McDonald voiced opposition to this because he believes it’s the responsibility of council to make economic decisions and not outsourcing it to another commission. He upheld his ranking of 4. Mayor Ryan explained that the council would continue as the Economic Development Authority but is interested in establishing a commission as a recommending body as a means of being proactive rather than reactive which would have been helpful with the downtown vision study. Councilman McDonald and Councilwoman Tjornhom debated their opposition for the need for more government while Mayor Ryan and Councilman Campion explained their reasoning for the need for this commission. Councilman McDonald explained that the current EDA can hold meetings. Councilwoman Coleman asked if council can change the ranking system for items. In discussion to implement a mental health awareness program, Councilwoman Coleman asked that this item be reconsidered to raise this item as a priority. Councilwoman Tjornhom stated she would consider changing her ranking from 4 to 2 to change the overall ranking to 1.9. Mayor Ryan asked if there were any other items council would like to discuss. Councilman McDonald asked for clarification on the item of addressing trail gaps and trail crossing safety issues. Councilman Campion stated he would be willing to go from 3 to 2 on that item. Councilman McDonald asked where the funding for the trail gaps would be addressed before changing his score from 4 to 2 which would bring the score to 1.7. Todd Gerhardt explained that staff will bring back a final list at the February 11th City Council meeting for approval. Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session meeting at 9:05 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 15, 2019 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.2. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No: N/A PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Planning Commission minutes dated January 15, 2019.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commissioon Verbatim Minutes dated January 15, 2019 Planning Commission Summary Minutes dated January 15, 2019 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 15, 2019 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Steve Weick, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, Mark Randall, and Michael McGonagill MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Todd Hoffman, Park and Rec Director; and Erik Henriksen, Project Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Mary & Allan Olson 7461 Windmill Drive Tim Nordberg 2126 Majestic Way Neil & Abby Ellis 7284 Bent Bow Trail Mauricio Goes 6930 Ruby Lane Matt Chambers 2169 Red Fox Circle Dake Chatfield 2700 Majestic Way Mehdi Ayouche 2102 Majestic Way Ann Nye 1641 West 63rd Street Bill & Jill Borrell 2300 Longacres Drive Jim Freebersyser & Michelle Treptau 6935 Ruby Lane Larry Stueve 7324 Fawn Hill Road Cherree Theisen 2072 Majestic Way Scott Wosje 7125 Northwood Court Laurie Susla 7008 Dakota Avenue Courtney Jennings 7406 Moccasin Trail Josh Kimber 2060 Majestic Way Melissa Murrujo 1973 Topaz Drive Jay Gerczak 1941 Topaz Drive Geri Stewart 1893 Topaz Drive Aller: Happy New Year. Welcome to everyone. I’m pleased to see that the commission room is full of our resident ready for our first Planning Commission meeting. Today is January 15, 2019. For the record we have a quorum. This Planning Commission is a recommending body to the City Council. That means we want you and suggest that you follow the items before us to the City Council for final action when they come up and we’ll let you know when they come up. Also all the items that we see, all the packages that we review are on the City’s website so feel free to, if you haven’t already when you go home take a look at the documents that are there in Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 2 preparation for any time that you want to come visit or whether you want to follow this particular item to the City Council for further action. Any person wishing to appeal a variance decision made by us sitting as a Board of Appeals and Adjustments may do so. That should be done in writing within 4 days. Public input is accepted when the Planning Commission opens the public hearing portion of any item. Tonight we do have a public hearing item before us so we’ll be taking testimony and again welcome to all present and we look forward to hearing your comments. Any persons wishing to speak are requested to come to the podium. State your name and address and your representational capacity, if any and then state your position either for or against the item or just your comments regarding the item. We look forward to hearing them. Any item is introduced first by the staff and they make a presentation of the report. Again that report is on the website. Once the staff makes it’s presentation the applicant or developer can come up and make a presentation. The public hearing is held. Once the public hearing is held it’s closed and then the commissioners will make discussion and take whatever appropriate action they deem necessary at that time. So with that we will begin with our public hearings and item number one. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER REZONING PARCEL (GALPIN SITE) FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL (RR) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PUD-R), WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT, AND SUBDIVISION OF 191 ACRES INCLUDING THE PRESERVATION OF APPROXIMATELY 100 ACRES AND THE CREATION OF 191 LOTS. Aanenson: Thank you Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. This item again it will be scheduled to go forward to the City Council on February 11th. I just want to remind you that we did have a meeting on this in the concept. That was held at the Planning Commission on July 17th and the council also discussed the concept on August 13th. Again the concept was part of the PUD process the applicant chose to go through to get feedback on that and we’ll talk a little bit more about that as we move forward. So the request tonight is to rezone the property from RR to PUD Residential. It’s also for the subdivision, a preliminary plat of 191 lots and a wetland alteration permit for a 1.2 acres. Don’t have a map on that one. The concept review was for low density. The site is guided low density. Excuse me, the land use designation is low density. 1.2 to 4 units an acre. The zoning is rural residential, 2 ½ acres. Rural residential typically is not serviced by sewer so in order for this project to go through the project proceeds consistent with the land use guiding which allows 1.2 to 4 units an acre. So in looking at that the applicant put together the different iterations of a, this is again was under the concept review. If it was laid out as a traditional residential single family which would be an RSF zoning district which allows 15,000 square foot lots. Also within the zoning would be compatible would be an R-4 which allows for twin homes and 15,000, excuse me 10,000 for the lots and single family homes for 15,000. Again the zoning also provides for residential low medium which allows 9,000 square foot single family homes and 7,260 square foot lots for twin homes and, or a PUD. Now the only way you could get the RLM zoning district or the PUD would be you would have to give preservation of a significant amount of woods so for example the Fox Wood is one that Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 3 we’ve done recently where we preserved a significant amount of upland trees and created a trail through there and the lots were allowed to be smaller. So this applicant chose to go forward with the PUD allowing for the density transfer. So in looking at this and meeting with perspective people that were looking at purchasing the property the Comprehensive Plan for this area adjacent to Lake Ann and to Lake Lucy was shown to be preserved so in order to that preservation to take place with the dedication of open space in lieu of purchasing the property the applicant and the City felt the PUD process would be the best way to go through to pursue the preservation without purchase of the property that was deemed in the Comprehensive Plan to be an area to be preserved. So with that. Hoffman: Thanks Kate. Chairman Aller and members of the Planning Commission my name is Todd Hoffman. It’s a pleasure to be here this evening. I serve as the Parks and Recreation Director for the City of Chanhassen and I’ll go over the slides that have to do specifically with the expansion, proposed expansion of Lake Ann Park. Significant size piece of property and then talk briefly about some trail planning that’s taking go in that area as well. So if we go back to 6-28-18. I can do it Kate from here I think. So the, or excuse me the Park and Recreation Commission took a look at the concept plan as well and their recommendation to the City Council at that time in the early stages of the development process was to say okay, we understand the property owner has the right to develop their property. The Comprehensive Plan and the Park System Plan says but our preference is to preserve that large area between the two lakes. Not put homes in there. Preserve it as park space but obviously they own the property. We don’t. How are we going to gain access to that property? Two ways. Well a number of ways to do it. So park dedication takes about 10 percent of any development and so that’s about 9 acres, give or take in this scenario. It’s also, it’s another way of calculating it. It’s 1 acre per 75 people so for every 75 people you’re bringing into a new neighborhood the City can ask for 1 acre. That’s about 9 acres. But in total there’s just about 50 acres of upland in the area that we’re going to be talking about. So maybe click forward. Is there a map? Yeah there we go. So this is just gives some context about the, we’ll get back to the other stuff once we get to that map. This will give you a context about what’s being planned in this general area. If you take a look at the yellow lines on the outside of the entire area, so you’ve got Lake Lucy to the north. Galpin to the west. Highway 5 and Audubon to the south and Powers Boulevard. Those all have comprehensive trail systems and neighborhoods on them and the goal is to get all of those people connected to this large expansion of Lake Ann Park. So Lake Ann Park currently is 100 acres in size. Has many amenities but this proposed expansion will add about another 100 acres to the park with all natural treed areas, some wetlands and then this trail system. So those lines that you see there are representative of what has been in the City’s Comprehensive Plan for a long time and so everybody that’s either owned this property or has proposed to develop it or any citizen that has lived in the area could have had access to the comprehensive planning documents and could have learned what the City was proposing for this property, both for parks and trails into the future. That just again text I’m not going to read but that’s what the Comprehensive Plan says is we’re going to build parks and trails within a half mile of everyone’s front door. Connect our parks and our neighborhoods via trails. That’s what our comp plan says. Again same thing. It talks about the 9 acres. So to accomplish that you have this large area inbetween Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 4 the lakes where the red arrows are and the red circles. That you could plat homes in but it’s just simply, it’s not very desirable for a variety of reasons to do it. If you’re a developer or a potential homeowner that might be desirable but from the City’s comp plan it says let’s get those homes out of that area. Allow them to be transferred to the west and to transfer that density out and so going back to the park dedication, 9 acres. That’s the first you can get so you’ve got 41 acres left to acquire. The City’s not in a position to buy 41 acres of property from Lennar but they’re willing to go ahead and say we’ll work with you on this transfer of density. What we want to do is we want to abide by your City’s Comprehensive Plan. We think it’s a good idea as well. Provide all the open space for all the neighbors but we also have to financially you know turn a profit. Make money in this deal just like any other developer and so same goes for the land owner. When they sell the property they want to obtain the highest and best value of the property and you just can’t, simply can’t say we’re going to take your property from either the landowner or Lennar. So then this is what you accomplish with that transfer of density. All of that open space. The large wetland area which is over 40 acres in size. 50 acres of upland inbetween the two lakes is preserved and the density transfer is to the west into that neighborhood. Gives you a little more of a graphical representation of what we’re talking about. So the green is all upland. The light blue is the wetland area. That’s a large wetland that runs north and south. It also drains, it drains from the south to the north. Drains into Lake Lucy and then eventually Lake Lucy drains into Lake Ann so that gives you at least some scale of the size of the area that’s proposed to be preserved as part of both the park dedication, 9 acres and then the density transfer out of the other 41 acres. So this just, the City recently finished a Park System Master Plan and this speaks to that. Development master plan defines the extent of the park expansion to the west and north and that’s what’s being done so the Park System Plan, and all that citizen input that was a part of that process just about 18 months ago said that this is the number one priority in our city. So when residents were asked what’s the biggest parks and trail priority in our city? They said preserving this area inbetween the two lakes is our number one priority as a community. Last summer the City Council identified a key financial strategy that said we want to start planning for this. We think it’s important for the future of our community. We want to communicate to residents what we’re thinking. Redefine, or define that Comprehensive Plan trail system a little bit more and so this is a concept trail plan that would show how the trails would connect, both through Lake Ann. Around the east side of Lake Ann and then connecting up to Greenwood Shores Park. That’s where the creek is so you would have your first bridge at that location then you, is the cursor showing? There we go, fantastic. So this trail here would continue. There would be a bridge over the top of the creek at this location. The trail would continue to the north. Second bridge over this creek and then the trail would connect to a dead end trail at this location right here which goes up to Lake Lucy Road. So that’s the first leg. Second leg would continue down around Lake Ann and work it’s way over to a boardwalk. This would be a boardwalk across the narrowest part of this neck down wetland and this is where the Lake Ann Interceptor comes through and so that’s where the large sewer line goes through for Met Council and then this would be the main connection, not just to the new neighborhood but also over along to the back side of this wetland to Galpin Boulevard into the adjoining neighborhoods so everybody can have access to this comprehensive trail system. And then eventually if this property ever subdivides then the final piece could be developed and Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 5 you would complete that ring around Lake Ann. But even without this parcel here you can still access Lake Ann Park from the new developments and it will continue to, the trail to the north. So you start making those connections that everybody would like to see happen around this area to preserve a very significant stand of forested area that would otherwise be developed into homes and you preserve that large wetland area so it becomes a common public space that everybody can access and gain access to and it’s a benefit for all. Park System Plan identifies those trail gaps and community input trails are the highest value amenity in our system. Connections to our Lake Ann are key and the desire is for more trail access to parks and natural areas, just what I talked about. That’s probably it for me. And so as we continue through, I’ve been in the city a number, a good number of years. This no doubt represents the largest park dedication opportunity that the City has ever been faced with so it’s a significant opportunity I think for the citizens of Chanhassen to realize long range plan in the City’s Comprehensive Plan but it does take that density transfer of housing and that’s the trade off and so I think that’s one of the biggest talking points as the Planning Commission moves forward. Thank you for your time. Aanenson: So I talked about the rezoning portion of the property…the purpose of the PUD and what we were trying to accomplish was using that as a tool so now we’re going to talk about the preliminary plat which has a lot more of the planning aspects and then significant amount of engineering so the preliminary plat then includes 191 lots. Of that the development area is 51 acres and it’s on 191 gross acres of land so there’s 3 outlots. The largest being the preservation area and then 2 outlots that are located here and up here and then there’s right-of-way that will be dedicated with this as a part of Galpin Boulevard. There is right-of-way being dedicated for that when that gets built in the future and so all the right-of-way is taken out as is the outlot area as far as taking the density so it is well under the 1.2 to 4 units an acre which is a requirement of the low density zoning district. So within the PUD one of the things that we look at besides the preservation is a variety of housing types so within this you can see there’s 4 different housing types and this was some of the issues that were brought up and I’ll let engineering go through a little bit more details but the original design showed the through street which is the preferred direction for the fire department but I’ll let the developer go into a little bit more detail but meeting with some of the neighbors to the north that they felt like having the two cul-de-sacs was the preferred. So this was one of the designs. So these are all, these are in the shoreland district which requires the 15,000 square foot lots so those would be the largest lots. It’s also, while talking about the shoreland district the DNR supports the density transfer and the preservation of those amenities next to the lake for water quality. And then the next, there’s some transitional zoning that came up at your concept plan. Some transitional, some larger lots here on the south side so that’d be 10 lots there so you can see within the PUD there’s 3, excuse me 4 different lot sizes and then they’ve got the 34 lots here and then the largest would be the 116 of those lots. Included in your packet we put the PUD ordinance in place so one of the goals I know would be the variety of housing types and then also we calculated all the lots. We went through and measured all the lots to make sure they met compliance and then also that they provide an opportunity because we know houses are flexible. Sometimes people want to add a screen porch or a deck so there was an opportunity for that so we went through that exercise too. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 6 So within that PUD ordinance there’s also an attachment of the housing types so within each, so for example the landmark series, there‘s different facades and then there’s different floor models and I’ll let the developer talk a little bit more about those but it’s my understanding that some of those will be changing over the summer. They might do a little bit different branding on those but we are going to make those a part of the PUD ordinance that they are similar and that they mix up the facades on the exterior and so they’d be different housing types so that has been demonstrated with the PUD which is also one of the requirements. Also the setbacks. The 20-25 foot setbacks. 7 ½ between yards. Again you have that in other zoning districts in the RLM. Sometimes we use the 5 and 10. You’ve seen it a couple different ways. The nice thing when you get to the 7 ½ it really kind of eliminates storage in the side yards because you don’t have a 10 foot side yard to put storage. And also it’s my understanding that they’ll also be submitting homeowners association rules of how they’ll regulate that. If you look at some of the other neighborhoods that Lennar’s done they have those requirements. So that is pretty much the subdivision itself. How it’s laid out so just wanted to remind everybody kind of what we talked about. This was a slide we showed doing the concept kind of the forestry area. So if you look at where the, kind of the open area is here. The preservation of this area of the woods. So the City Forester put quite a bit of detail in the comments for the preservation and yes there are some woods that are going to be removed but also significant portion of the woods will be saved. So in looking at that we also looked at the fact that if you did a traditional subdivision there would also be, could you do some custom grading? Potentially but there’d also be some tree loss with that too so I’ll go in a little bit more detail of the preservation area. Everything in that shaded like this is in the preservation area. Then you can see some of the grading limits. I know some of these edges of the wetlands are important but we’ll talk about that in the wetland in a minute but the nice thing about on this side of the wetland you kind of preserve these existing edges. But in the tree canopy the minimum about 9 ½ acres was not included in the calculations so you don’t get to double, you have to dedicate something so you can’t double count that so the canopy is a little bit less than what was calculated as far as the total preservation area. There’s, so a recommendation of revegetation of the landscaping. I think there’s some areas that we think preserve some of those edges along the wetland. Also along Galpin Boulevard for those typical buffers so there will be trees that will be put into the back yards or the front yards on those lots and then we’ll be looking at that with the final grading plan but there’s a pretty detailed report from the City Forester then on that and feel good about the direction that we’re moving in that regard in the forestry and landscaping plans. With that I’ll turn it over to engineering to go through. Henricksen: Alright thank you Kate. Good evening everyone, commissioners. My name’s Erik Henricksen. I’m the project engineer with the city. I’ll be presenting the engineering review for easements, right-of-way, streets, retaining walls, utilities such as sanitary sewer and watermains. Beginning with easements and right-of-ways. As you can see from the map the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services has a 20 foot easement that bisects the site diagonally from the northwest corner to the southeast corner. There are two locations the applicant is proposing to impact their easement. One is location A where they’re going to be constructing the Street Z and location B where they’ll be grading for some lots off of Street G. The council or MCS has been Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 7 provided and supplied the plans and have no comments or concerns at this time regarding the impacts to their easement. If there are any changes to any of grading plans MCS will again be provided the plans for comments. Right-of-way dedication will be required along the east side of Galpin Boulevard. This is per Carver County’s comments along with Highway 117 corridor study and the typical roadway sections identified in the County’s draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The corridor study did identify that specific, there were specific right-of-way needs right here. It indicated that a 50 foot dedication from the center line of Galpin Boulevard would be required. This has been illustrated on the preliminary plat by the applicant. In order to satisfy the County and City’s conditions the applicant will be required to produce cross reference submittals such as grading plans, profiles and respective cross sections at key locations such as intersections where ponds kind of abut the right-of-way and other key locations identified by the City. These will be subject to review by the County prior to recording of the final plat. The applicant is proposing to construct 5 stormwater basins. From the preliminary grading plans and grading details drainage from individual lots will be routed away from buildings into a series of catch basins and reinforced concrete pipe in the back drainage utility easements located in the back yards. Drainage from proposed public streets will be collected through catch basins located next to curbs and routed to stormwater basins for treatment. The applicant has not provided in their narrative or in the preliminary plans details regarding whether the site will be mass graded or will undergo a phase approach. The applicant shall supply a mass grading plan or a phased grading, whichever is applicable for review and approval by the City prior to the issuance of grading permits. Lastly the stormwater best management practices and proposed facilities for treating runoff have been evaluated and are found to be feasible to meet the City’s stormwater master plan or management plan and the stormwater standards. All required updates addressed in the staff report to the preliminary models must be addressed and submitted to the City for review. Additionally this development falls within the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek watershed district. They have been provided plans. Pending any comments from the watershed district the applicant shall address those as well. More grading. There are two bluffs within the site. It’s kind of difficult to see but this hashed area up here is what has been identified as a bluff within their site plan. This is located behind the lots of 111 through 115 off Lucy Ridge Lane. There is a second bluff located behind the lots of 125 and 126 abutting Street Z. As you can see the grading plans do not indicate the location or extents of the bluffs and their appropriate buffers and setbacks. This may impact grading of these areas and any subsequent construction of retaining walls or building pads in the area. Thus the applicant would be required to submit updated grading plans that illustrate these bluffs and their setbacks while adhering to bluff protection ordinances prior to issuance of grading permits. The preliminary grading plans do illustrate grading for Basin 400 that will encroach into the southern section of the City’s well house number 3 and water station site located off of Galpin Boulevard. As addressed under the water section of the staff report the applicant will be required to perform site improvements to the well house number 3 site. One of the improvements is the inclusion of the realignment of the access off of Galpin Boulevard. As you can see from the preliminary grading plans that hasn’t been incorporated yet so we want to see the coordination of this access and it being illustrated on the grading plans prior to the issuance of grading permits. Furthermore this access point is one of those key locations that we’d like to see the cross reference material for the Galpin project Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 8 that’s scheduled in 2022 to insure proper alignments, elevations, and the like. The preliminary grading plans indicate drainage of back yards from these lots here. This stems from Lot 164 down to Lots 174 which abut Street A. This runoff will be, will go directly onto the proposed trail. Runoff from these lots will degrade the trail and unnecessarily and warrant undue maintenance and upkeep. Furthermore runoff would actually go directly into the Wetland 11 untreated so the applicant shall submit revised grading and stormwater plans to deal with the stormwater here. One of the recommendations might be either to swale it or as they proposed prior to is to install the catch basin and RCP system to come into Basin 400 for treatment. East of Lot 111 abutting Street A the applicant is proposing a stormwater conveyance system. The preliminary grading plans indicate a grade of up to approximately 30 percent which runs perpendicular or across slope to the stormwater system. Maintenance and repair activities on such a steep slope are difficult and can pose safety concerns. The applicant shall adjust the grading plans for a more appropriate grade. Engineering does recommend not more than 10 percent over the utility. Additionally staff does have concerns about slope stability in this area here. The applicant shall submit an updated geotech report which will include the soil types, the ground water elevations and slope stability calculations for this area based on the proposed structure to be constructed on this lot here. Retaining walls. There are 3 retaining walls that are proposed on the preliminary plans. All of these retaining walls do exceed a height of 4 feet. Therefore they’re going to have to be designed by a professional engineer or landscape architect. Those designs will have to be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of grading permits so that we can review their stability. Wall 1 is approximately 200 feet long and ranges from 6 to 8 feet in height. The construction of this wall appears to be within a bluff setback area. That was discussed earlier. This is Street Z. This is Lot 124 and 125. The retaining wall may have to be adjusted but this is going to be pending the updated grading plans so engineering will be excuse me looking at that for review. Wall 2 is approximately 170 feet long. This here will require, this is another key location that we’re going to want to see cross reference material because of the proximity to the right-of-way line which we discussed earlier on cross reference material. Wall 3 to the south here is approximately 420 feet long and ranges from 4 to 10 feet in height. The retaining wall is offset approximately 10 feet from a stormwater conveyance pipe that you can see from the drainage and utility easement here. This retaining wall will have to be adjusted to maintain a 1 ½ to 1 buffer from the bottom of the stormwater pipe to the bottom of the retaining wall. This is for maintenance purposes along with structural stability of the wall to give it an appropriate buffer if those maintenance activities have to be conducted. Moving now to streets. The applicant is proposing the construction of 9 new city streets and the extension of 2 existing streets. The City shall own and maintain the streets after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. All newly constructed street sections shall be designed to meet the current standards specifications and details and detail plates for residential streets. After review by engineering they do appear to meet the majority of all our detail plates and standards. One addition will be the, from the detail plate for our residential streets would be the addition of draintile on both sides which weren’t provided. The proposed streets in line with existing ones off Galpin Boulevard which are Longacres Drive and Hunter Drive. These alignments promote full access management and circulation of traffic and also match the design considerations for the Galpin Boulevard construction and the Highway 117 corridor study. These new streets and Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 9 extensions will result in 6 cul-de-sacs with 5 of the 6 proposed cul-de-sacs meeting city code. Street Z, a newly constructed street and cul-de-sac in the northern section of the development exceeds the maximum length for a cul-de-sac per the city ordinance. As proposed Street Z has a length of 1,576 feet measured from the center line of Galpin Boulevard to the center of the turn around radius of the cul-de-sac. Engineering recommends the approval of the cul-de-sac as the topography would require substantial grading for a through street and the loss of significant trees that would alter the physical character of the property and the surrounding parcels. Furthermore as Kate mentioned the residents to the north in the Ashling Meadow neighborhood strongly opposed the through street. Because and since Street Z has not been proposed as a through street the stub off Ruby Lane is no longer necessary. Ruby Lane services no driveways and will not be required for future connections. Therefore the developer will be required to remove the hard surface, restore the area to the existing natural conditions and construct half street improvements which would be curb and gutter to maintain continuity of Topaz Drive and the drainage along Topaz Drive. The City will reach out to the abutting property owners to see if they are interested in the vacation of the right-of-way. However all utility easements will remain in place. Then here the sidewalk located at the intersection of Galpin and Street E terminates to, with no proposed connectivity to, at the intersection to the existing trail system on the west side of Galpin. Using the manual of uniform traffic control devices approved practices for pedestrian crosswalk and intersection improvements the applicant shall construct that connection. Water and sanitary sewer. The applicant is proposing to construct an 8 inch PVC C900 watermain and 8 inch PVC sanitary sewer main throughout the entire development as well as streets. The watermains and the sanitary sewer mains shall be owned and maintained by the City after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. The staff report enumerates the comments and conditions regarding both systems. However all those comments and conditions addressed are in regards to the building and construction permits. Overall the applicant has proposed systems that meet the City’s best management practices, construction standards and standard specifications for construction for the installation of public utilities. The only major change to the preliminary plans would be the addition of a back feed location for the long dead end of Street Z which shall connect to the existing stub off of Ruby Lane. There’s an existing watermain that was stubbed out during this, the construction of a stub out of Ruby Lane. Aanenson: Thank you. So now we’re onto the third action which is the wetland alteration permit. So as we mentioned before there was a 41 acre wetland that’s going to be preserved. There are 3 impacted, excuse me 5 impacted wetlands and those include 12 and 12A. These two wetlands here and then wetlands 3, 4 and 5 would also be impacted so if you look at the total of wetlands on the site, 1.2 acres of 47.54 acres are being impacted so 3 percent of the wetlands are being impacted so this is going through a wetland alteration permit process. We are recommending approval as we’ve done with other applications but there’s, it’s still moving through the process so we are supporting the alteration permit itself. So before we get to the motion there are a lot of conditions in the staff report. All those conditions, I mean there might be some modifications to the plat itself. That’s not that uncommon. As the project engineer indicated there’s condition to mitigate all that and we believe that all those things can be accomplished with some modifications. That may be if we have to stay away from a bluff or to Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 10 get a trail through there might be some changes or reconfigurations or maybe even a loss of a couple of lots as it moves through those modifications. But with that we do believe that it, that this project again with all the conditions of approval could move forward so with that we are recommending approval of the rezoning to the PUD. PUD Resident including the design standards. As I indicated we put together specific design standards calling out the different plans and the standards that we would recommend for that. In addition we’re recommending approval of the subdivision with 191 lots, the 3 outlots, the dedication of the public right-of-way and the plans proposed here tonight and then also that we approve the City recommend that the City Council approve the wetlands. We also have attached Findings of Fact so with that I’d be happy or any of the staff would be happy to answer any questions the Planning Commission has. Aller: A lot to digest. Tietz: Andrew? Aller: Any questions at this point of staff? Tietz: Chairman Aller. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Yeah I have a couple things Kate and Todd. Obviously preservation of open space and parkland is pretty critical but I have a fundamental issue with the transfer of density. The June plan or concept plan that we, that was presented in July illustrated 54 lots on the Lake Ann parcel or the east parcel. And my question and one of my questions on this is how was the plan tested and verified? To my knowledge there is no grading plan, wetland assessment other than the plan that we saw here. The impact on wetlands. Whether they’d be filled. Tree removal or inventory of trees on any of that parcel and obviously the shoreline and wetland setbacks. I don’t know that there is, that plan was tested so I can’t logically say that there were 54 buildable lots or if there were 70 buildable lots or 20 buildable lots. To follow up on that I really question the, if the acreage is feasible for development because of it’s accessibility. There’s wetland crossing on the south. There’s wetland and steep slopes connecting to either Topaz or Lake Lucy Lane on the north. If not feasible economically or the ability to obtain approvals for those two connections, developable, to make it developable, then the lot count is irrelevant so I guess I’d like the staff’s comment on that. I just, there’s no evidence that that plan was tested to the level that we see on this, or on this current set of plans. Aanenson: So is your question is would you like to see a full blown engineering plan on that then I would think they would probably move towards that as an option for cost. Tietz: Well I’m just not sure that it’s developable period. Under current regulations crossing the wetland and traversing the slope and connecting to the north, we always have issues with the north, with the traffic issues and they illustrated a change in their plan to create two, one long Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 11 cul-de-sac which the fire department in our document says that they do not agree with that even through engineering says that it’s feasible but the fire department disagrees with that. So I’m just questioning whether or not that connection to the north would be obtainable and the crossing of the wetland to the south is it, obviously anything is financially feasible if you have enough money but, and the duration of trying to get a permit for the wetland crossing. If the land is not technically developable there’s no transfer of density. Hoffman: Commissioners I’d be glad to address some of that. So density transfer is a tool that we want to use and so the City wants to have access to a density transfer tool to make this possible. It’s a negotiation and so there was a 54 lot count at one time. Now we’re down closer to 41 lots being transferred out of that area. So are 41 lots developable in that area? That’s a negotiation. We’re not, if the City Council directs us to go out and decide if those lots are absolutely buildable into that area that may be something we would have to do. But it’s a negotiation. You just can’t take these people’s property from them. Is it accessible? Sure. It could be accessible from the south. It’s got a dry land connection from the south. Does it have value? Absolutely and so if it’s not developed during this subdivision you could just simply hang onto it. Lennar could hang onto it and sell it when the south piece develops and you can just drive right into it. And so the City is attempting or recommending to both the Planning Commission, the Park Commission and the City Council that we utilize the density transfer. Right now it’s somewhere in area of 41 lots. Could 41 lots be developed in that property? That’s a question that you’d have to ask yourself. Staff believes it is. It’s valued at that. That’s an area that you could put 41 lots. If we can transfer that out and move it to the west that’s a way we can access millions of dollars of property that the City would not otherwise have the ability to go ahead and purchase so it’s a tool that we want to use. How far you want to test that tool, that’s a discussion item. Aller: Do you have a second one? Tietz: Well yeah a couple more but I think that was the most critical one and I’m not sure, where did the 41 comes from Todd? I’ve never seen it in any publication. Hoffman: So if you take a look at there was originally 119 lots over there. Now I think we’re down to 160 and so that equals you know about 41 that are being transferred over there. So we have 160 lots now. I think there was 119 on one of the original plans so you know it’s, again that number if fluid. It goes from it started at 54. It could be down to 41. It might be somewhere inbetween. That’s a negotiable number. Tietz: Okay. Can the, and my second question would be related to the Galpin, the standards for the PUD. It doesn’t appear that there’s a lot of standards applied in there other than the setbacks and so forth. And I’m just curious whether that can be amended to include other items? Aanenson: Absolutely. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 12 Tietz: Such as trail lighting. Such as way finding. I’m also concerned about the appearance on the street front that all the models that have been submitted to us have the standard garage compliment which will be a wide open mouth to every one of those high density units. I’d like to personally see that a significant percentage of those lots have garages that enter 90 degrees to the street because it gives, it changes the character of the neighborhood that the setbacks as opposed to everything being lines up just 20 feet back from the right-of-way. There should be some variation. I think architecturally we deserve to have the benefit of some alteration to the strict picket fence street frontage and I’d like to see further discussions of that maybe after the meeting and as this plan progresses. Aanenson: Sure. Tietz: To have an opportunity to have the Planning Commission and others address those site specific things. Ashling Meadows has a wonderful neighborhood facility that was built in conjunction with the development. They have the community building of their own. It’s not city owned to my knowledge. It has a pool and it has wonderful facilities for the neighbors and that’s just the immediate property to the north. Items such as that could certainly have been considered in this development so those are a couple of questions I have. Aller: Commissioner McGonagill. McGonagill: Erik I’ve got a couple technical questions for you. When you were going through the catch basin size and I was just looking at that, the amount of water coming in there because it’s a fairly large footprint of the subdivision. Particularly I was thinking about Basin 400 and some of the others, how did the sizing of that because I worry about if those basins overflow impacting the houses in proximity and then as it went into the wetland. I guess it’s Wetland 1 to the south if I get this right. Or Wetland 11 I guess to the south and it was backing up into those homes so tell me about catch basin size and water handling because that is, that will be an issue with this given the fact it’s low and there’s going to be a lot of rain off if there happens to be a significant rain event. Henricksen: The stormwater analysis and the models provided were reviewed first by our Water Resources Coordinator or our previous Water Resources Coordinator. Right now she’s no longer with the City and then along with a consulting agent so when it comes to the sizing of the rate control and volume control for the stormwater system it was inputted into hydrocad. Those models were provided to the City from their stormwater management report they were meeting all the hydraulic conveyance requirements. However through the review of the model there were some changes that we needed to see about some of the variables they used so that is actually some of the resubmittals that we’re waiting for in order to insure that those size requirements have been met. McGonagill: What size rain event were you thinking? You know it’s in the model because I’m not familiar with the hydrocad you’re using. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 13 Henricksen: Okay yeah, the rate control or those standards are for the 2 year, the 10 year and the 100 year I believe that is one of the requirements for the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek watershed district requirement that they’re also conducting a review on. The actual intensities of those events I don’t have on hand. I’d be happy to. McGonagill: So maybe the simpler question, are the basins designed for 100 year event? 10 year event? Henricksen: Yes. McGonagill: So they’re designed for 100 year event? Henricksen: Yeah. McGonagill: Okay. Next question. In the package Carver County talked about the access roads. Entering from the subdivision onto Galpin and they were talking about the need I think for you know proper turn lanes. I think it was off Street A and Street E. To have enough wide so they can turn in there to traffic. Were those addressed? Henricksen: Is that for the full access control off Galpin? McGonagill: Perhaps. Maybe I don’t have my terminology right. Henricksen: So the Highway 117 corridor which was a study that was completed by Kimley- Horn. They did an evaluation on a couple proposals for best access management control. They did include right turn lanes, left turn lanes for both north and south bound but that’s off of Galpin. McGonagill: No I’m talking about off of the streets in, what kind of, did they put the tur lanes into Streets A and E on this subdivision or are they just straight stops? Henricksen: So the, that project won’t have any effect on the actual access points for… McGonagill: Okay I’ll try it this way. Street A and E run into Galpin. Henricksen: Right. McGonagill: Are there going to be turn lanes on Street A and E? Henricksen: Okay so we haven’t received those, that cross reference material that’s being requested for those key intersections. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 14 McGonagill: You haven’t received that from the developer? Henricksen: We have not yet. McGonagill: Okay. Henricksen: That’s part of the what we need to see prior to issuance of final plat to insure that we have proper widths. McGonagill: Okay, thank you. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Weick: I actually just follow up to that and I’m, is there any indication how those intersections at Longacres and Hunter will be managed? Whether it’s like stop sign or stop light, do we have any? Henricksen: Those two intersections will have stops from the east and west but north and, up and down Galpin Boulevard will be, it will be free flowing with left and right turn lanes. The Highway 17 corridor study there will be, on Galpin there will be improvements to install cul-de- sacs north and south of this development but for these locations you’ll have no stop control. Weick: And is there, did you do any estimate of how much dirt, earth will need to be excavated off of this property? Do we have any, and I can ask the developer that too. Henricksen: The developer should be able to answer that. That’s a part of the comments with the, that we weren’t given any type of mass grading or phased grading approach with that. When we get that grading plan obviously we want to see haul routes, stockpile routes. We want to see cut, fill sheets and that kind of things so we can. Weick: Okay. I just was wondering if there was an early estimate on that or not. Okay. And then I just had two other questions I think probably Kate. On page 1 when it talks about the acreage and it talks about gross versus net. Can you just clarify the difference between gross and net? Aanenson: Yeah. So we take the wetlands out for net. So gross is a total acre of 191 so then we would take out stormwater ponds, right-of-way, wetlands, those all come out. Weick: Okay. Actually that’s my last question. Aller: Great, any additional questions at this time? Commissioner Madsen. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 15 Madsen: These I think are for Kate. When we looked at this request last time there were some areas of concern and I was just wondering if you could summarize if and how those areas of concern were addressed. The first was there was a concern of overall density. Another one was steep slopes on the north side and the through traffic. A third one is the width of the lots on the south end along with the buffers to that south neighborhood and water runoff in that south neighborhood. Aanenson: Yeah I’ll address some and I’ll let the developer address them too but regarding the steep slopes and that was where the two cul-de-sacs came into play kind of blending those two neighborhoods. Preservation along here. I know the trees that are on this property are of interest to the people to the north. Those are some of the areas that were of concern so these are all 15,000 square foot lots and I know there’s a greater buffer creating for some of those existing homes and again I’ll let the developer talk to that. On the south end those lots were made larger on the south end abutting the 15,000 square foot lots to the south. Also the project engineer talked about the retaining wall and drainage to pick up some additional water that’s coming off the backs of those lots there and providing a conveyance for those to get treated so those lots were transitioned to be larger lots so there’s a better buffer there. I think some of the challenge too with that retaining wall is to provide, continue to maintain some of that buffer on the south but as we pointed out in the staff report as a general rule we don’t require a buffer between single family single family. That’s, you know we usually try to buffer between higher intense uses but through the preservation of the, if you came with the retaining wall there may be some areas that they can try to preserve through that area. I’ll let the developer, as far as stormwater and the rest, those have been as the project engineer indicated, I believe those have been addressed. Obviously there’s still some minor tweaking for those as we locate some of the trail connections that might again impact the total number of lots and as we talked about maybe a free right or a free left on some of these. The widening of the intersections of the streets also a potential for some of the lots too, to not make the total. Did I answer them all? Madsen: I think you did. Aanenson: Okay. Madsen: One follow up question. Aanenson: Sure. Madsen: There was a letter from the fire marshal and he was not sure of the width of some of the cul-de-sacs and indicated what the required width needed to be. Will that all, if it is found that those widths need to be adjusted will that all be incorporated into what they will be required to do? Aanenson: That’s correct. So there’s a difference of opinion, the City hasn’t adopted those standards but that would be the fire marshal’s request so we’re working through that issue but Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 16 yes that would also impact the number of lots. So to be clear the 191 would be the ultimate. It may be less than that as we work through some of the trail connections and the right-of-way at the end of the cul-de-sac, those sort of issues. And as we, the touch down point at Galpin Boulevard as we talked about that. If there needed to be additional turn lanes or something of that there. Madsen: Okay thank you. Aller: Thank you. Any additional questions based on those? Hearing none if the, oh Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: You know…talked about averages. Lot averages. The front yard width averages. I’m assuming that we have no averages anymore. That if this plan does proceed forward that minimum lot sizes would be minimum lot sizes. It’s not an average of a lot size. It’s not an average of a front width. If it’s 65 or 90 or 75. Aanenson: You’re correct. So if you look at the compliance table, yep. We put those in the compliance table. Each lot has. Tietz: I just want to be sure that Aanenson: Agreed. Tietz: Now you always spoke of averages. Aanenson: No. Tietz: In the previous submissions. Aanenson: No. There is a, and that might have been just in general but no we calculated all those. We also asked them to give us an area for additional…per lot so we checked all those but we do measure at the building setback line which is how we turn in any zoning district so but you’re right, they are all calculated and those are all in the table that’s with the PUD ordinance. Tietz: But on additional buildable per lot, I know Steve we’ve always had a lot of discussions about preserving space for people to do something in the future. Some of these lots have dramatic drop off’s. Aanenson: Correct. Tietz: They may have theoretically space for that future gazebo or, but there’s no way you can build it. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 17 Aanenson: That’s correct. So those. Tietz: How do we protect in this process that every lot has a buildable area that’s been set aside for future? Aanenson: So as with other parts of the city people are also living on bluff areas that they have not the potential so what we talked to with the developer is that as part of the disclosure with those lots that have maybe a more scenic view but not as much space to add something else on, that those are all part of their disclosure documents because we do have other lots in the city but also abut a bluff or, yeah so we’ve asked them to put that in their disclosure documents and I’ll let Lennar talk a little bit more about that. Tietz: I guess to avoid variances for the first homeowners. Aanenson: Absolutely and we don’t, yeah. We don’t want that. Aller: Okay hearing none we’ll have the developer come forward. If you could state your name and address and representational capacity. Tell us about your project. Joe Jablonski: Good evening Mr. Chair, members of the Planning Commission. My name is Joe Jablonski here this evening representing Lennar Corporation as the Director of Entitlements and Forward Planning. Aller: Welcome back. Joe Jablonski: Thank you. I was taking some notes so if I missed anything feel free to stop me. I’m going to kind of back up a little bit and want to go through a few of the changes that we made and some of the things that we’ve been working on since you originally saw this back in July and council saw it in August. We have gone back. We have met with, we did hold a neighborhood meeting. We had, I had met individually with some of the neighbors as well and in doing that some of the things that we’ve done and changes that we’ve made, I’m going to kind of walk them through on this plan here. As staff mentioned we did change the north portion quite a bit. We eliminated that road and that was something that was very important to the neighbors to the north. Connectivity and the reduction of traffic concerns was very important to them. There were some challenges related to the grades and some of that stuff that had to be looked at more closely as well but the decision to do that was really based off of the importance of not having those connections to the neighborhood. They really wanted to keep the neighborhoods separated and we were able to support that with this plan and in doing so these couple lots that you see here also changed significantly from the original concept. We actually had lots backing up to that area. What we’ve done here has allowed us to preserve a lot more trees as a buffer between the two neighborhoods. That was important to some of the residents that lived right up against the back of it. It also allowed some, there’s a fair amount of grade change from the back of this property line down to the back of this area down there. It ends up Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 18 being about a 30 foot grade change and leaving some of that northern part natural allows it to be, keep that slope. Keep some of those trees that were there and we recognize the importance doing that. Lot sizes. We did go back and change the south end quite a bit. We had a series of smaller cul-de-sacs. There were approximately 54, 55 foot wide, what we referred to as villa lots in that area. We reduced that down to 34 and put them a little bit more centrally located in through this area and what we did along the south property line is we expanded those to be 75 feet wide so we did make them 20 feet bigger than what we originally proposed to help match up to the neighbors to the south. One of the things that we also learned at the neighborhood meeting was the importance of not only planting a buffer there but also trying to preserve some of the trees that were allowed on the south side. So after we conducted our tree inventory we did go back and were able to preserve some trees along the south. It’s about a 20 foot corridor that we hope to maintain up through about halfway where the transition to the grade becomes challenging and we have to put in a retaining wall. But in doing that it does help relieve some of the water and we’ll be adding storm sewer to the back of those too to help relieve some of the water that was brought up as well. Architecturally we are proposing a variety of house plans. We do have two very distinct styles. One of them in the smaller lot area is more of a villa type product where we would see full maintenance type of product that would be catered to folks that don’t want to maintain yards. Folks that aren’t interested in maintaining the exteriors of their homes. That will be handled by a homeowners association. So it really is the type of product that as needs of people change and whether it’s spending time in other parts of the country or just don’t have the time or don’t want to spend time doing that kind of thing we feel it’s an important piece of the neighborhood to allow something that’s a little it different. We did cut back the number of those a little bit but that was just as much to demonstrate a reduction in the lot count as it was recognizing that there’s a real need for that type of product. It’s a very under served market so we felt it was very important to maintain and keep some of that. The predominant or the single family that you see throughout I did mention that we did do some larger lot sizes adjacent to the neighborhood there. Those would be a plan style that could accommodate up to 4 car garages. It is a little bit bigger type of plan. We did, the rest of the plans in the interior we have a variety of styles. Some of them have been submitted for the packet but we have at least a selection or a catalog of 10 homes which each have 4 to 5 house plans. We’re constantly changing them. As Community Director Aanenson mentioned we tend to constantly change and evolve our house plans to meet the desires of the market and in doing so recognize that we would have to maintain the architectural standards that are set forth in the PUD. It would be probably more interior type changes. Name changes to the plans. And variety in façade and what that does is it helps create a dynamic neighborhood. I think our neighborhoods stand up very well to the test of time and variety and we do have a, we also impose a monotony code that doesn’t allow for us to put the same house across from or on either side of a home to continue that trend for variety throughout a neighborhood. Color packages are also looked at very closely. We have an in-house design team that reviews that to make sure that the neighborhood is full of variety and interest. Talk a little bit to the north property. What we were planning to do which is a little different from the original concept, we’re looking at sectioning that portion off to potentially allow custom builders or to even allow a different developer to proceed with that portion of it recognizing that they would be part of the overall PUD and that would have to appear to the rest of the PUD but Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 19 knowing that you know in some capacity we may participate in it but also recognizing that there’s strong interest from the custom building world that may like to take a crack at some of that as well. Let’s see. There’s a couple questions about grading and earth work that I heard. The way that the grading plan appears to be working out is the area up in, whoops sorry about that. The north portion will likely be able to kind of balance on it’s own. That’s approximately 85,000 yards to finish this north portion which would be this cul-de-sac and this portion and the ponds that go with it. That’s not final numbers but it’s the ballpark that we’ve been going off of. The south portion could, it looks like we can grade that probably in two phases. We would start at the south end where the watermain utilities start at this intersection. We would have to connect into the Met Council interceptor line and our first phase of development or first final plat would probably be in this area here. The grading for the completion of the south section is about a 285,000 yards so it’s a, obviously there’s a lot of earth work to move but it’s not, for something of this size it’s not an uncommon type of number for earth work. Let’s see what else did we have here? I think I mentioned that the final plat area for the first phase would be in here. Moving on from there I would expect that we would do this in about 4 to 5 final, subsequent final plats which would allow us would take out about 5 to 6 years for final buildout. That’s not fully considering what exactly happens up on this north end but that’s kind of what our range or our target absorptions and what our vision of the property is. We do recognize and we see that we think that this is going to be a real asset to the City of Chanhassen. Not only to the new residents here but the existing residents and to have the trail connectivity and the ability to access public space and that much public space. It’s one thing when you work in a 5 acre park or a 10 acre park, a pocket park or something like that but this is something here that has the opportunity to be incredibly special for the city with the two lakes. Trail connections to a major regional park and we think that it will be a tremendous asset not just to our community but to the overall community of Chanhassen. Let’s see we have met, sat down and met with the engineering staff. He did a good job of going through some of the details of that. There’s a lot of items in there that need to be worked on but as we went through them item by item we feel that we can address the items in the report and we’ll do so as we get to final plans. Final construction drawings and before we address the permitting process so I’m confident that we will be able to continue working through those. I guess if there’s any other questions I’d be happy to answer them for you. I guess there were a couple questions about street frontage, architecture, and some variety. We have offered as part of the packet we did include a side loaded plan that was, we refer to as our next gen plan. That is a little bit different type of concept or housing type that it’s, we refer to it as the home within a home. It is a, it has it’s own grandmother suite. Architecturally it is a side loaded garage so it does allow for that to be incorporated into our plan set. I know that staff has some concerns about how exactly that’s used but from an architecture standpoint and from the streetscape it does allow an additional plan style that could meet some of the desire for the side loaded garage and I’d be happy to talk about that a little bit more if needed. As far as the community center, a neighborhood amenity. In our opinion the park is the neighborhood amenity. We really try to highlight the use of open space and community space and when we build isolated communities that aren’t attached to large regional parks and large systems like that, that’s when our marketing platform tends to focus more on the smaller neighborhood type private features which is what at one time Ashling Meadows was. You know it was kind of a Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 20 stand alone community in an area that wasn’t real highly developed but now you’ve got the parks into place and the addition of this park and the trail system and we feel that that is more than adequate to support the recreational needs of the neighborhood. So I hope I answered the questions. I do have a couple of drawings here just cross sections that might help show a couple of areas. This is a cross section of the, it’s referred to as Street Z. The long cul-de-sac so this is looking to the south from the Ashling Meadows neighborhood. So if you were in this house here and this would be your home, this is the elevation approximately of where our homes would be. So they do sit down because of the topography and where the street gets cut in. They do sit down a little bit. We did preserve quite a bit of tree space inbetween the two and it just kind of gives you a little picture of relationship wise how that works. I do have some that overlook the park space. This shows how much wooded area is being preserved through there and helps highlight the wetlands, the low areas. The low areas in the wetland, this wetland is along the edge of it is full of trees as well. I do have one more here on the south. This is the cross section for the south neighborhood approximately halfway down the street. The existing home this time is on this side. So originally the spacing between the back of the house and the property line was at 50 feet. We were able to free up a little bit more space and we limited the depth of the house pads on the first 10 homes that, we made them wider and we elected to limit the depth that those houses could be so we were able to create 50 feet to the tree line and then another about 20 feet. 25 feet between the tree line and the property line. And we’re also proposing to plant trees within there too so we are creating a pretty substantial buffer not just for the existing homes but also for our residents looking into their back yards so with that I’ll be happy to answer any questions and recognize that there’s several people here that probably want to talk so if I have to come back up I won’t be too far. Aller: Alright thank you. Questions? McGonagill: Yes Mr. Jablonski. When you on your grading plan I was trying to interpret this from the package and I was having trouble. Could you point out the areas where you have the maximum elevation change and how much of an elevation change there is within the grading plan because you know it doesn’t have to be exact but orders of magnitude because with the 285,000 yards you’re moving there’s a lot of dirt. You know it’s going to be cut and refilled so could you show me that. Show us, the commission where those points are and how much of an elevation change there is. Because there’s quite a bit of elevation on the site and you know for sure. Joe Jablonski: The most significant change from top to bottom would be from the north property line down to the backs of these lots that go down to the wetland and inbetween there we have to cut in a flat road which is why you start seeing a retaining wall kind of down along here. You can see that there’s quite a bit of slope off the back of these. That’s where from top to bottom there’s the most. McGonagill: So about how much? Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 21 Joe Jablonski: From this property line down to here it’s about 30 feet. McGonagill: Of cut that you’re going to have to cut? Joe Jablonski: No not that we have to cut. Some of that is being made up by the walkout elevation too so we’re proposing 10 foot basements on there as well to help make up from the front of the house to where the walkout elevation is, that helps make up some of that. So we’re cutting the road in but allowing the natural topography that’s out there in some degree to set the elevations of the houses. The other places, and I didn’t bring a full cut fill map but the other, let’s see if I have that. The other places that we’re moving the largest amounts of dirt is where on the edges of, let’s see. I apologize. This might be as easy as anything. So there’s a fairly significant hill kind of right in the middle and then it starts dropping down to the wetland and from the top of the hill down to the wetland again you’re probably looking at about 30-35 feet and the areas that are getting the most cut and fill, the elevation is locked at Galpin so we’re coming in at Galpin and gradually sloping it down to the wetland area so what we’re doing is kind of taking that hill and starting to pull that out and down to fill in the areas to set the basement elevations that are an acceptable level above the wetland but starting to fold that grade down out of that hill and pushing it through down towards the wetland. McGonagill: How much are you going to have to pull it down? Joe Jablonski: From the top to the bottom? McGonagill: (Yes). Joe Jablonski: Well the elevation along the wetland has to be built up about 12 feet so there’s about and I think there’s about 6 feet but a lot of the dirt coming from here is actually coming out of the pond. Because we do have to excavate fairly large ponds in there too. McGonagill: Right okay. Aller: Any additional questions at this point? Tietz: Commissioner Aller. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Back in July the council requested additional concepts to be submitted and I think that if you look at your concept from June and July of this year that all I see is really a subtle variation of the original concept. Can you explain your process and why there weren’t other submissions made that would be considered alternative concepts? Personally I don’t consider this an alternative concept. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 22 Joe Jablonski: What we have elected to do is meet the desires of the request that we felt were necessary. Out of the comments, out of the neighborhood meetings, out of the council, the items that, the big ticket items that we felt could be addressed through our planning, we’ve done that and elected to move forward with the plan that you see before you tonight. Tietz: So it was really just in response to neighborhood requests and not really looking at it from a technical standpoint of what else could be done with the property to potentially preserve more of the vegetation and more of the terrain, is that accurate? Joe Jablonski: There’s a million different ways that this property could be developed. This is the way that we’ve elected to move forward. Tietz: One concept. Joe Jablonski: I wouldn’t say it’s one concept. Tietz: Okay. The intent, in approving a PUD of this nature, and this is from the ordinance, is that the product reflects a higher quality of design than is found elsewhere in the community. Can you explain how your proposal achieves these expectations? Joe Jablonski: We have a product that is designed to meet the market demands. We are proposing or self imposing a higher standard of architecture and exterior materials than is required by code. Tietz: But is it higher than anything else in the community? Joe Jablonski: Higher than some communities certainly. Tietz: Okay. Can you explain your sustainable practices that have been incorporated in this plan and design? Joe Jablonski: Is this from the PUD language? Tietz: No, this is just a question. What are your sustainable practices that have been incorporated in this design? Joe Jablonski: I apologize I don’t understand the question. Tietz: Well there are sustainable design practices. Whether it’s reclamation of water and reusing it for irrigation. There’s a lot of sustainable practices that are being used in other communities and in other practices today. What is Lennar doing on this project? Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 23 Joe Jablonski: We’re following the standards in the code. We haven’t, we’ve elected at this point not to go into water reuse because, and we may change our minds on that when we start getting comments back from the watershed that it’s something that as we get into further design and planning. We have looked at the area of the townhouses using water reuse but at this point because of the proximity to the ponds it didn’t make sense. Sustainability wise I would say that the amount of preservation we’re doing is by far exceeding what is required both I the 50 acres and our willingness to not disturb the wetlands. Tietz: Okay. That’s all I have. Aller: Additional questions at this time? Thank you sir. Okay at this point in time we’ll open up the public hearing portion of this item. It’s an opportunity for those present to speak either for or against an item before us. In particular the item that we’ve just been presented with. We’d ask that you come forward. Don’t step on each other’s toes as you come forward. Go ahead and speak your mind but do so politely and respectfully as we would expect all citizens of Chanhassen to do. I understand that there have been several meetings. We’ve had several presentations before us where people have had an opportunity to speak so what I’d like to do is concentrate on those areas that are most important to you. This is a public forum and an avenue to put our thoughts and our processes down so the City Council then can take additional action on it at a later time so we want to make sure that we’re clear in our intentions for them. So with that I will open the public hearing portion of the item. Any individual wishing to speak either for or against the item please step up to the podium. Geri Stewart: I guess I don’t have specific for or against. My name is Geri Stewart and I live at 1893 Topaz Drive so it’s that northern zero with the cul-de-sac. I just have a concern that supposedly, well we did get a buffer and I was very excited about it for a while until I saw that, the cul-de-sac has got houses that are backing up kind of almost to my yard but I don’t know how deep that buffer is and it turns out that the buffer is part of two yards. They crammed two houses in on either side up against and that property actually belongs to those yards so if they can do anything they want with that what’s to keep them from building a pool right behind my yard or have a huge ugly swing set or cutting down all the trees that supposedly were a buffer. I was just wondering if there’s anything that can be done to truly make it a buffer. Make it conservancy. Make it some kind of thing that they’re not allowed to cut down the trees. I don’t know how easily the City gives variances on that. I just, I think it’s nice that they wanted to make the buffer but I would really like it to be a real buffer instead of having that one house at the end and then several houses that go past the cul-de-sac at this end. That’s kind of my personal thing there. Aller: Great, thank you. Geri Stewart: And I would like to know how much space that is. It’s a little drawing. If the road has to be graded they may wind up having to cut down a lot of the trees just to put that road in. I don’t know how in the end, how much of a buffer it will really be. L Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 24 Aller: Great, thank you. Any additional comments? Individuals wishing to come forward, speak for or against the property that would be great. And while he’s stepping forward I would also note that we did receive an email correspondence from Gregory Stewart which has been received and read and will be made part of the package. Dake Chatfield: Alright my name is Dake Chatfield. I live at 2200 Majestic Way. I’m in the southwest quadrant of the development being planned. You can see my home is here so we’re looking at Galpin Boulevard here and Majestic Way on the south side here and so I’m right in this corner lot here and I think my questions are probably to Mr. Jablonski. There’s quite a bit of old growth woods and forest here and looking at the plan I guess I’m assuming that all that’s going to be clear cut and houses will be put in there. So this is the same thing only with the overlay. So I guess a question is, is all that woods going to be clear cut. And then I want to make sure I understand the buffer here. On the south side it looks like a 25 or 20 to 25 foot buffer which I guess is not super significant in my opinion. That’s, I mean that’s half the size of this room or whatever. That’s not a very big buffer and so if I were to offer any recommendations I think if you know these neighbors could get a little bit bigger buffer inbetween there that would be my recommendation. Aller: Thank you. Welcome sir, please state your name and address for the record. Scott Wosje: Okay thank you for giving me a moment. Scott Wosje. W-o-s-j-e, 7125 Northwood Court in Chanhassen. Longacres neighborhood. Aller: Welcome. Scott Wosje: I actually, thank you. I actually sit, I’m the guy that didn’t show up for the Longacres Board meeting and they made me President again this year so. So we did talk amongst the Board and amongst the 222 homes. We’ve tried to gather some information and everybody has their own perspective. You know Mr. Hoffman, actually I’ve gone to the Park and Rec Commission to try and say hey, get us a mountain bike trail. Carver Trails is a non- profit that I’ve helped start that’s trying to develop mountain bike in Chanhassen, Chaska, Carver County so very much support the parks and Kate I’m sure has a perspective of it meets the city code let’s do it. Perspective is everything and so that’s what I guess I’m trying to say. If you live in Ashling Meadows the perspective be this helped us a little bit. If you live in Longacres the perspective is this is going to hurt our home values. The developer seem to be concerned with keeping a buffer but yet is going to clear cut everything along the Galpin Boulevard. When my son was born in 2001, January of 2001, December of 2001 I put him in a back pack and every weekend I walked through Prince’s land and would say hi to, believe it or not Roger Prince Nelson would be out and he would be out and about. Larry Graham who used to live in the rambler that was torn down were out and about and they invited us over. I walked that land a lot. The contour of the land leads me to believe that this is questionable whether that this can really happen. There’s a lot of unknown. As I’m sitting here listening I’m going, it seems like we’re Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 25 trying to force something and so the perspective is the developer says well hey we’re, we want to develop this. Let us do this. The City has a perspective. The Longacres perspective is this is not good for us. They’re clear cutting everything. We’ve been used to having this. The density transfer doesn’t seem to be fair because you’re dumping everything on our side of the neighborhood. Again that’s our perspective. Everybody has a fair perspective. I would also like to love to know who, or I would love to hear your motion actually because the proposed motion is the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve this. I would like to hear your motion not, I’m guessing that’s a city staff. I want to hear what your motion is or what your proposed motion is because I don’t know how this proposed motion can move forward. I also wonder what the plan is for the development on the south. You’re pushing all this traffic onto Galpin but what happens when there’s a development on the south and does it make sense to spread that traffic out a little bit more. If this would get approved I would also ask that you would lower the speed limit. At 45 there’s a lot of people that use the sidewalks and as you know or may or may not know the grade going up and down along Galpin is somewhat dangerous and there’s a lot of, that sidewalk’s also very close to Galpin as well so a lot of thoughts. I’m trying to think if I have, I just was writing a couple meandering thoughts. But I guess I would respectfully ask with all the unknown variables I would ask you not to approve this motion and actually get another plan because as council or whatever, John Tietz say, I mean I’ve watched this all along and I was expecting to see another plan and we don’t see another plan quite honestly so thank you for your time. Aller: Thank you. Any additional comments? Josh Kimber: Good evening everyone. Josh Kimber, 2060 Majestic Way. I’m on the south side of the lot. You know what I’ll be honest with you, when we were here in July and August I mean I left both this meeting and the City Council meeting you know feeling pretty good. The comments that we had, both from City Council and what you provided the developer I think were spot on and I guess I just don’t think that we see that reflected in this plan. At the Planning Commission, or at the City Council meeting 3 council members did express the desire to see a Plan C and they spoke about it as seeing 3 separate plans that they could look at and that actually didn’t happen which was a little disappointing. Specifically asked for 3 plans to go through concept review but a lot of their comments were matched a lot of the residents and the quote that Mayor Laufenburger said at the time was, he used closely similar when speaking to lot sizes and he said similar, similar buffers and similar hard cover and again I just don’t see that in this plan. Specifically when speaking to lot sizes right, actually this one’s a better view. When I look at lot sizes here there are 3 proposed lots to 2 lots and to me I don’t look at that as similar lot sizes or of similar sizes. Also the image that was shown showing the side view of the buffers, I don’t believe that happened either. Now I know that we use creative words to talk about how there’s expanded lots or larger lots but the old lot sizes that were in this southern side were those villa houses and overall if you look at what was proposed versus what is proposed on this south side we actually added 5 houses so they removed 14 houses from the north but added 5 houses to the south so I understand that this line of homes did receive a larger density but overall at that southern lot this whole, that whole package is actually more houses than what was on the other Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 26 side which is a little disappointing. Another comment that was left out tonight was when staff provided comments on the concept review was the desire to keep a tree line to that south side which is where I reside and that essentially has been gone away. They did provide a copy of what trees would be removed and they do keep some of these trees now on the south side but a majority of those trees that my neighbor so generously talked about do get removed. All the trees on the south side, all the trees along Galpin which is really disappointing in my mind. Overall, and I don’t, there’s some weird math that happens in these plans but when you look at the canopy plan it talks about how there are 42 acres of canopy to be removed and there’s a total of 52 acres of development so that means 80 percent of this plan to put houses in removes trees and that’s extremely disappointing to me and I wish that overall I wish you guys would deny the plan to move forward. I think it’s important that we see 3 comprehensive plans or concept review plans side by side and not look at this. I don’t look at this as Plan C. I look at this as Plan A2 so thank you. Aller: Thank you. Cherree Theisen: My name is Cherree Theisen. I live at 2072 Majestic Way. I too am neighbors with these guys. I was one of the very first houses built on Majestic Way. When I built I’m repeating the story that you have heard at the other meetings but it doesn’t seem like it’s sunk in with anyone. Went to the City and I asked okay I plan on being here for a while. There’s this wonderful natural tree line. If Prince sells that property what’s going to happen and they said we will never remove that natural tree line and I went alright. So our whole neighborhood, I don’t have to show you but our entire back yards were for the most part treeless. Our kids were young. They could run. They could play football. They could play soccer. They could do whatever. My kids grew up in that back yard with the neighbor’s kids. I look out and I see a wall of trees. My house is one of them that he’s planning on going in there and clear cutting the whole damn thing. And then also putting in that water treatment thing, I would like to show you the pictures of my west wall of my house that was collapsing 2 years after it was built because of the drainage that was coming down in. I had to remove everything on the west side of the house. Have the wall pushed back out. Steel beams, the City of Minneapolis came, or State of Minnesota came to engineer these beams that had to go in my basement to hold my house up and keep that wall where it’s supposed to be. They took out all the clay that was on the west side of the house. They put in 2 sump pumps. Ripped up my whole totally finished basement. I mean I spent thousands of dollars and I did all that work myself when I moved in so it kind of hurts a little bit more than the average bear. However it’s very discerning to find out that what you’re going to do is going go what, 25 more feet up? More water’s going to come down into my yard. It’s going to come into Joshua’s yard. It’s going to come into my neighbor’s yard and we’re all going to get flooded again. I have two sump pumps running constantly and my basement has flooded more than once. Now there appears to be an awful lot of effort put into this new development for the north side. Meetings with the people. No one came down to the south side and invited any people from the south side to discuss. Nothing has been changed down there. Like Josh said I look at those plans and here’s my back yard. To have nothing back there now but there’s going to be 3 houses there for 2 houses on our side of Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 27 the street. If this goes on I’m outta here and I know you don’t care but I do. I’ve been here since ’95 and I’m getting dry mouth so I’ll shut up. Aller: Thank you for your comments. Jim Freebersyser: My name is Jim Freebersyser, F-r-e-e-b-e-r-s-y-s-e-r. I live at 6935 Ruby Lane in the Ashling Meadows neighborhood. We’ve been tracking this project as it’s gone along and come to previous meetings and it’s pretty clear that the builder is doing as little as possible in terms of giving us other options. They’re understand as a businessman that they’re trying to minimize their up front costs but I would suggest that the City consider a really radical option which is the City should buy the property and just end this nonsense. End this monstrosity that seems to be just like a train hurtling down the tracks trying to force fit this whole project. I would be more than willing to see my taxes go up and even localize that levy to the people who are affected than to continue to do this. I’d much rather see it stay the way it is so my recommendation would be that the planning committee could consider that as an option and say no to this PUD. Aller: Thank you. Anyone else wishing to come forward? Please sir. Todd Simning: Todd Simning, 2145 Wynsong Lane. I’m just across I guess the west side from Prince’s property and full disclosure I’m a builder/developer. Pro development because that’s how I make my living. I would actually recommend tabling or not approving the plan tonight myself. I’ve heard many instances from Erik over here that there’s a lot of items out there, issues out there that just aren’t fully completely understandable from grades to drainage to bluffs to, I mean you name it. I mean from drainage pipes or whatever that he mentioned over there. He went through a litany of items. In my opinion anything that the Planning Commission would look at tonight to say that I give approval to something, you really need to have a full understanding of what you’re approving and with the plan tonight you don’t. I have no problem with density transfer. It’s my business. I’ve done it before. I’ve done it in the city of Chanhassen. I’ve worked with Kate. I’ve worked with Todd. They’ve been very good to work with. In the case of the ghost platting with 54 lots, Todd’s saying it’s a negotiation. 41 lots. Let’s call it that. Without having a true understanding of what the impact is on grading. When you look at, when you look at the west side what they’re doing, it’s a mass grade. The only way they’re getting lots in there they need to completely rip down all the trees and they need to completely grade it out to make it work. What do you think’s going to happen on the other side? You think they’re really going to fit 54 lots in there? 41? Call it 32. I don’t know what it is. I don’t think anybody actually knows what it is so when you’re in negotiation I’m with the City. I think it’d be a really super cool area and I think it’d be a great park area. But you’re negotiating with something you don’t even know yet. And it could be 100. Okay? I’d take that chance to say that it’s probably less than 54 and probably less than 41 but to be honest with you if you don’t really know what you’re negotiating with how could you really actually give them the density transfer? Whether it’s myself. Whether it’s Lennar. Whether it’s Gonyea. I don’t care who it is. Whoever it might be if you actually don’t know the impact you’re negotiating with Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 28 yourself without, not even knowing what you’re negotiating with. So just again pro development. Something’s going to be there. I just want to see it be the best plan that it can and I think as good stewards of Chanhassen, as elected public officials you just owe it to yourselves. You owe it to the City. You owe it to everybody, to all of us, just to make certain you know what kind of decision you’re making before you actually make it and so if it meant it took another 60 days to actually kind of look at it and see what the real impacts are, take that time. It’s okay. So that’s all I have. I appreciate it. Thank you. Aller: Any other individuals wishing to come forward to speak either for or against the item? Seeing no one come forward I’ll close the public hearing on this item. I will invite Mr. Jablonski if you’d like to comment or make comment after hearing any of those items. Again understanding the comments weren’t something that you could truly anticipate so we’d love it if you could do your best to comment on those items that you can or let us know that there’s additional work or information that needs to be done. Joe Jablonski: Mr. Chair and members of the commission. I was taking some notes but if I missed some things I apologize. As far as the north portion, it was the recommendation of staff in the report that conservation buffering or a conservation easement be placed over the areas that tree preservation was proposed especially in the more significant standing areas and I agree that that’s a good idea and we support that so while we don’t have a prepared conservation easement, that is something that we will continue to work on with staff and imagine that would be more of a final plat type of condition as well or on a document that would be resolved with the final plat. Let’s see the, you know I think one of the things and it’s difficult for me to say this or potentially difficult for people to hear this but there is a willing seller out there that wants to see their property sold. We’re a developer who is in the business of developing property and building houses. The overall density that we’re proposing on this is at the very low range of what is allowed in RS-1 and you know there’s concerns and of obvious nature over the tree removal but we’re also meeting the City’s standards. We’re meeting the tree replacement requirements. We do have some adjustments to make within our plan but we feel we can make those. We have done what we can to preserve the perimeters and buffer the perimeters. And properties of this nature, there’s change that occurs and change can be difficult and at the same time there’s certain rights and there’s certain rules set up within the city code that allows for tree replacement. Tree preservation. Tree canopy. That’s why you have those systems in place and we’re meeting those guidelines and our desire is to meet those guidelines and part of the density trade, it’s difficult for us to consider or even propose giving up 50 acres of land as well but it’s important to understand that that’s part of the trade here is you’re not just getting a small park. You’re not just getting a small area or a neighborhood park. You’re getting a very substantial area that has a very substantial cost to it and there was a suggestion that you know perhaps the City could entertain buying it. That’s a possibility but right now the contract is with us. We have a contract to purchase it and so right now to me that’s not an option and that’s because there is a valid contract in place. It is something you know the City could certainly discuss if the City would like to entertain or make an offer to us to do it, you know that’s something that is a whole different conversation but there is value there. It has been serviced by sewer and water. It is Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 29 guided for development to occur on it so regardless who the former owner was and what the property was intended to do by the former owner, right now the intent is to sell it and for it to be developed and we’re playing within the guidelines of the code. We’ve asked for a PUD but we feel that we’re giving up a substantial amount of area in exchange for some of the requests that we’re making. You know there’s certain items in here that we will continue to work with staff on but the conversation of what could or could not be done in the south area is, or the eastern part is, as Mr. Hoffman mentioned, that’s part of the negotiation. We feel that part of the trade off for some of these other things occurring is that the City is getting a much larger park than what is required of us and that’s, you know I think that addresses quite a few of the concerns here. Maybe not necessarily the way that people want to hear them. I do want to point out that we are proposing storm sewer along the Majestic Oaks property line to help alleviate some of the water concerns or the stormwater concerns. That is the reason why we’re putting storm sewer near that property line to pick up some of that drainage of that area and in doing so we have to take down trees to do that. We have to put that as far back as we can to pick up as much water from the Majestic or the Royal Oaks neighborhood as we can. We’re not necessarily required to do that but that’s one of the items recognizing the concerns that were brought up that we’ve elected to address. I don’t know if there’s, was there any other specific items that I missed? Aller: Any additional questions while he’s up? No thank you. Joe Jablonski: Thanks. Aller: Alright so now it’s time for the Commissioners to speak amongst themselves. Pros. Cons. Thoughts. Motions. Actions. McGonagill: You just want us to start down the line? Aller: You can go ahead. Commissioner McGonagill. McGonagill: First thanks for all the citizens that came tonight and have been coming and particularly to the staff. You put a lot of work in this. You have and to the developer as well. A lot of time. A lot of money. A lot of effort and trying to work. It’s a difficult problem. This property is a jewel and all of Mr. Hoffman’s work is trying to preserve that jewel and I really appreciate that. I’m in favor of development. I think development’s good. I mean that’s why we live here. I really enjoy Chanhassen. We have a development we live in, in a beautiful setting and this property as I say is a jewel and I do believe it deserves a beautiful setting for that jewel and it needs to be done in a proper way. One of the things on the Planning Commission that we take very seriously is a couple of things when we look at proposals that we cited. Two things. One is what I call function. Does it meet the function but also does it meet form. Function, engineering term, does it meet function. Stormwater drains. Driveways. Egress and plain and clearly meets function. It’s functional. It works. Homes build there. People can get there and has a lot of other really great attributes and so that’s done. Then you look at form and there’s a lot of really pluses to the form. Like Mr. Hoffman said beautiful park. Access to trails. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 30 And things that are really good so when I started looking at the question of form, and I’ve been looking at this for the last few days, how do you do that and what’s lens you look through so I pulled out the Comprehensive Plan because that’s where we should go. That’s the plan that governs our growth. I mean that’s why it’s here. It lays it out so as I went through the plan, and citizens please bear with me because I’m really talking here to, now to my commissioners. Is that what I found when I was going through it in my rudimentary way was that really in some ways there’s a lot of benefits to what we’ve seen here from the developer and from staff but there’s also some limitations. When I look at natural resources in Section 1.7.3 of Natural Resources there’s 9 goals and of those goals 4 are violated in the plan. It does not preserve natural slopes wherever possible. It doesn’t preserve wooded areas, plant communities and native habitat. It does not minimize soil erosion and sedimentation. I realize they do with their plan but when I look at the amount of soil that’s going to be moved and the soil mixing that’s going to occur that bothers but more importantly it does not increase overall tree cover in Chanhassen. That’s goal 5. Also with that it does not increase canopy cover on private and public lands to a minimum standard of 50 percent. I noticed in the cutting plan that they said they’re, what they’re going to cut and they’re going to add plants, add trees back but they’re still 33 percent short. And they said well they would fix that and I’m going, and I said how are you going to fix it when the density’s that high. I mean I drove around over the last days and went by other developments that have this kind of density and it’s hard to get trees in there so I just don’t think that’s possible to do goal 6 which is maintain a healthy and diverse urban forest. But all things you can’t have everything but that’s just the first piece. And then when I looked at I guess densities. Yes you can do mixed use. You can move, increase densities. Alternative homes and it goes through that but then I went back to the primary goal that we come in on land use and our goals and policies. Again I’m an engineer myself but I have to look at principles. Does it meet form? And when I looked at that I said one of the things that it says here and it’s particularly in the fourth point that our goal is to create a mixture of development capable of providing high quality of life and a reliable tax base here in Chanhassen. I agree with that. High quality of life. That’s why I joined the Planning Commission a year ago was wanting, I’ve been here 20 years. I wanted to continue to have that for not only myself but also for the people that would follow me. It’s a wonderful place to live. So in that what it says in the four negatives it says we will support low density residential development in appropriate areas of the communities in such a manner and I quote this, to mainly aesthetics of existing single family areas and to create new neighborhoods of similar character and quality. It also goes on in one of the other statements that transition should be created between different land uses and the more important the transition zone it has to have been these land uses. And to me the way this looks it’s a real big change in land use. I’m a simple person so what I ended up doing and I took the plat of this development. I laid it up against a base plat that we all get. The big plan plat and said what does this look like, and it didn’t fit. And then I took Google Earth and did it again and laid it on there and then I started imaging what it would look like in 20 years. We are going to clear cut trees. Will the trees go in? Will it be back and I just could not get there. And so I had to ask myself a question. Does this development, does this plan, following the core principles for our Comprehensive Plan, which is our structure that allows our plan that allows the City to flourish, will this neighborhood allow itself to flourish in it’s position, will it flourish in position relative Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 31 to the other neighborhoods in close proximity. Will it be additive or will it be subtractive? And so from the environmental standpoint it’s a plus because of the park but with the surrounding neighborhoods and the rest of Chanhassen that’s where it kind of gets dark. A little bit cloudier to see. So as I said at the beginning this is a choice piece of property. It’s a wonderful jewel. It needs a beautiful setting. I do believe there ought to be a Plan C setting better. I’m not, I don’t look at this and I say does it meet my personal test on, particularly when I look what’s in our plan and when I looked at the overall design. So pros and cons are all there but I’ve concluded personally that it’s not additive for the City. It’s not additive for what we want and I’m not in favor of it. And I would encourage you, my fellow commissioners and the City Council to do the same. Thank you. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Andrew I’ll probably add to what Michael has just stated but you know the plan proposes diversity in housing type and size yet the process of developing the property has reduced, if not eliminated the natural diversity. The loss of habitat, flora and fauna. There’s loss of visual diversity. Disruption of natural water flow. Loss of wetlands and topographic diversity. Mass grading accompanied by the loss of vegetation and if I look at the sheets that were submitted of the inventoried trees there’s over 2,600 inventory trees on the site and looking at the ones that are going to be saved I’m guess that there’s over 90 percent of the inventoried trees which were trees of significant size are going to be lost through this process of mass grading. Included edge and as we all know the edge is the most diverse area in the landscape. The edge is where you have vegetation change. You don’t have the big canopy trees. You’ve got, well you’ve got buckthorn I know but you also have a lot of dogwoods and other understory trees that provide a diversity for habitat and for birds and just for visual diversity and that zone will be lost. It’s significant resulting in, and this will result in a new, a very basic plan with little natural diversity. This is not a call for no build but rather a question of what is the proper carrying capacity of the resource to create a truly high quality development. What makes a neighborhood and what makes our community? What does Chanhassen want of this, for this prime development site? What is proposed is just another housing development planned to the maximum allowable within the transfer of density with no distinguishable character. That’s all I’m going to say. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: I guess in some ways my view differs from your’s. I do see that there have been some changes to the plan. Some of the streets have been changed. Maybe it’s not a large enough change that you know others have requested but I do see that the developer has listened. Has made some changes. Trying to preserve some of the steepest of the slopes. Preserving some of the trees. And then as I understood it I believe that there might be even an easement on the north side. For the buffering that neighborhood. I’m not sure if there’s an easement on the south side but I see that the developer has listened to the concerns of the neighbors on the south side and it sounds like they are going to address some of the water issues that were not of their making and to try to improve that. He showed us some of the additional footage for that buffer down there Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 32 but it was limited because of those improvements that he wants to put in. I do see that the lots on the south side are larger to be more comparable but are definitely smaller than the ones on the south side but I don’t know that our zoning requires that lots have to be exactly the same size from neighborhood to neighborhood when it’s all single family. So perhaps there is more that could be done to preserve this unique and wonderful property but they have proposed to preserve a huge amount of parkland to keep it pristine. To keep it natural and as what I’ve heard from the Park and Rec Director was when they went out and spoke to citizens of Chanhassen that one of the most important things that they wanted was the trail connectivity. Was to have this unique park which I think is a unique asset, not to just this neighborhood but to the surrounding neighborhoods and to the whole city so perhaps there are some tweaks that do need to happen to preserve those steep slopes. Maybe you can preserve more of those trees. I don’t know all the particulars of all that but I do see an effort to try to listen, adjust the plan and work with the city so you know I am leaning in favor of it. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Thank you everyone for your position. Yeah this is tough because our hands are tied. There are, there is more than one option out there as I understand it and that is for the developer to develop the land as they wish and not give us a park and go ahead and develop that land around the lake and probably in so doing make the lots bigger all over the property. Probably save some of the grading issues and we wouldn’t have to sit here and debate it at all because we would not be able to connect the park around Lake Ann. As I understand it. I, you know maybe my understanding is wrong but they certainly don’t need to be here to listen to this and you know maybe that’s an elephant in the room but it truly comes down to a hands are tied type of decision. Do you want the 50 acres or don’t you? And really that’s what it comes down to. To get the 50 acres we have to stuff a bunch of houses on the southwest side of that property. I mean that’s it. I mean that’s the trade off. I don’t see a solution where you can say I want the 50 acres and I don’t want 190 lots or whatever it is stuffed on the southwest side. I’d love for that to be the case. And I think it’s noble to say I’m going to vote no because I don’t like that but understand what you’re voting against which is a really nice big jewel of a park for the City of Chanhassen. I’m not, I don’t know how I’m going to vote I’ll be honest with you but I, our hands are absolutely tied here. This is not, this is not a good position for us to be in. I mean you can join in. I’m not trying to, but that’s the way I see it so I’d love to hear otherwise and I hear you know people that I do care. I do care about the houses and I do care about the potential for flooding. That does matter to me. I hear that the contour, some, I’m sorry I don’t know who said it but you know they say the contour of land just doesn’t work. You’re right but when they’re done just flattening it, it will work and that’s what they’re going to have to do. They’re going to have to flatten it and they’re going to have to take out all the trees and to do that then the other side of it is we get a park. I hate it. I hate it. I hate that there could be, I actually wrote it down before all this even started. I said it’s not much of a choice, and this was before this whole thing even started. I said I’m sad that there’s nothing I can do. I would be proud of the legacy of the lake preservation and that park and embarrassed by the legacy of the housing density and those are the choices that I have to face as a planning commissioner and I hate that. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 33 Aller: Commissioner Randall. Randall: Yeah I agree with you. It’s a tough decision. I mean I read through all the stuff tonight. Immediately I thought of the people on Majestic right away because of the flooding issues. You know is that going to be an improvement? Is that going to fix the problem for them or is it going to make it worst? You know Lennar will be long gone after, if they do have flooding issues but at the same time if it improves it it makes their property better. I went with a lot of different angles on this. Looking, trying to make a decision. Whether it be decisions that we’ve made in the past with variances for cul-de-sacs and if it’s going to be a through street right off of, we dealt with that a few weeks ago. Or few months ago. This is another compromise where do we make, were we thinking that same way on that side? I don’t know if we were or not. That bothered me. I looked at the aerial photos back to 1937 to see what this area was like. There was farms in the Topaz development. There was farms at Majestic. There was wooded coverage in this lot because it was undevelopable without moving, until the value got there for them to move the earth to develop it and that’s where they’re at right now so it’s the growth of the city. I get the trade off. I think the point on a lot of different angles that need to be taken yet, or there’s a lot of moving parts to this but now all the moving parts have been totally figured out and that’s a concern of mine too without moving forward and right now I’m still undecided so I’m hoping we have more discussion and get some input from you guys so. Aller: I agree that it’s a tough position to be in and I look to our responsibility, my responsibility as a commissioner to try to please not just the neighboring community. Not just one particular section in a plan but the entire city and the entire plan. I mean we spent the better part of last year creating that plan and one of the biggest things that we all talked about and discovered as we went through week after week, or bi-weekly was the integration of that plan. How traffic interplayed with the environment and how the tree cover and the water structures all had to interplay and then we went through that process where we were hearing about the visioning of the city and I heard big things about where do we want to go and were we going to fast to develop and here we have an opportunity to preserve a pristine piece of land with an incredible size. An incredible stature for all citizens and for all residents and one of the biggest problems that we’ve been facing as a planning commission over the last year was the infill. We’re running out of developable property in such big sizes so we’re infilling and we’re putting pocket properties in and we’re doing a lot of variances because the properties have gotten older and the needs of the community have changed. So when I look at the process that we’re going through. We’ve got 65 different items that still have to be met and I agree that there’s a lot that still has to be done. Commissioner Weick with his trees, I’m surprised to hear you say anything other than no and I’m glad to hear that you recognize you know those responsibilities as we all do and I’m on your side. There’s a plan to be looked to and guidelines that we’ve created as a community over time but I think those change but the one thing that we can do and have an opportunity to do now is to move this forward and that’s one of my things that I’ve always done here on the commission is I try to move them forward with the guidance to the City Council because we’re not making a final decision tonight. With the guidance to the City Council to further input of the community so that they can have the opportunity to modify this plan, to tweak it and they’ve Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 34 shown the ability to listen to the community. Make changes. Some are small. Some are large but I think if they take it to heart, you know the comments about the ability to do things that are grander and in a long term sense and benefit to the city and the community and I think they will. I hope they will and when I vote I try to look at that positive side and that’s where I am right now. I’m going to vote I hope in what’s in the best interest of the community as a whole. Tietz: Andrew this isn’t just about natural resources. I know I said and talked a lot about diversity and natural resources. It’s about creating a neighborhood. It’s creating a neighborhood for people. People who want to be there and is this going to be a model neighborhood in Chanhassen or is this going to be just another neighborhood by a large national developer? I could go to Brooklyn Center, I could go to Omaha, I could go to anyplace and find lots stashed on the site. Now we’re creating a site, we’re creating, there’s been said several times tonight we’re creating a flat site to do what this happened. You know what this is proposed to be and there’s a lot of flat sites around. Maybe not in Chanhassen but there’s a lot of flat sites around to stuff houses on. …opportunity here to create a model neighborhood that people are excited. We’ve got all the resources. We have schools. We have parks. Nothing against the potential of getting a large piece of land against, adjacent to Lake Ann. I fully support that. I just disagree with the amount that is being stuffed onto this property. This is a giant variance is what we’re being asked to approve. The biggest variance that I’ve ever been a part of. It’s a PUD but essentially it’s a variance because all the rules are being negotiated and massaged to make it happen. Aller: Well I agree with you but also a PUD by definition is a variance. I mean. Tietz: I know. Aller: It is so we’re talking about the same thing. We’re talking about taking a piece of property in it’s raw state which includes everything from the Lake Ann setback all the way to Galpin and modifying it to some degree. Tietz: Changing all the standards. McGonagill: Chairman? Aller: Commissioner McGonagill. McGonagill: Appreciate the comments of fellow commissioners. I’ve been exactly where you’re at. I’ve been all over the map on this. I look at it one way as a citizen. I look at it another way as a planning commissioner so I actually pulled out and pull out the job description of a planning commissioner and again I look at it. What’s our job? You know and it’s really to look at summarizing subdivisions, flow, design of use of land. I’m not on the parks and rec commission. I’m on the Planning Commission and as such I agree with you Commissioner Weick. Parks are beautiful. The subdivision is not what I want. It’s, I’m sad, I would be sad to Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 35 see it in here particularly where it’s at because it’s such, it’s surrounded by beautiful subdivisions. It’s got the lake. It’s got everything there. I just go it’s the wrong spot for this. It’s not wrong for Chanhassen but it’s the wrong spot for this kind of development and so I had, when I put on my planning commissioner hat that’s how I got to where I am. It is just a lot of things about it don’t meet what we would say to be an aesthetic of what Chanhassen is. And I took some more encouragement on that, and I don’t know if any of you all had the chance to do it but from our new mayor in her comments last night. She commented in her, after her swearing in ceremony that she wanted to see Five C’s for Chanhassen. I won’t go through all of them. She can do it better than I but it’s community, communication, collaboration and the last two were commitment to excellence and a commitment to Chanhassen and those two are where I’m at and in that commitment to excellence she said take aim for excellence. We do not want mediocrity and I agree with that 100 percent and I think listening to her and the comments of the other council members and particularly the one on Chanhassen that together we can build a better community is what put me where I am in this camp. As hard as this is and what it means to the 50 acres over by the lake, I worry about that. How does this all work? But as a planning commissioner I’m not committed to mediocrity and neither is the council, at least our mayor and I’m with that so that’s how I got there. Thank you. Aller: Any additional comments? Randall: I have one. Aller: Commissioner Randall. Randall: I, you know I go back and forth here but there was one element in here that I really thought of and it went back to some of these other variances we’ve dealt with in the past and it was the one from the Fire Marshal. Weick: Yeah. Randall: And that was, you know I man it seems simple but have we gone that far with this that we’re going to allow that when we wouldn’t do it somewhere else and that’s the issue I have with it. It doesn’t get fixed I mean you know I might be somewhere else but right now just for that one little thing I mean it seems simple but it’s not because we wouldn’t allow that somewhere else so. So that’s why I’ll be voting no for it. Weick: But if we’re voting no then what’s the next step for him? What do you see as the next step? What does tomorrow look like? McGonagill: Well I do believe the way the process works, Chairman you can correct me, we’re making a recommendation to City Council and the City Council has to act on it. Now they do take us under advisement but they have made decisions in the past I understand and 180 degrees from what the Planning Commission has recommended. But as a body we’re here to advise Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 36 them and that’s what we’re doing. Now have we dumped them a big problem in their lap? Absolutely but they get the big bucks for that you know and so, you know they ran for this so I, I understand Commissioner Weick. What is the option? It’s like I looked, I had to get another way because I always think of analogies. Yes that park we could get is beautiful but I can’t let that blind me in one eye and lose sight in the other. You know I can do that but I still have to have a subdivision that meets what we want here and that’s when I got here so yes, they have to sort that out. They have more resources than perhaps we do but that’s, I appreciate their problem and I’m glad I’m not there. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: Just wanted to make one comment about the cul-de-sac and normally I would never go along with that because of the Fire Marshal’s comments but the reason it arose, the cul-de-sac came about was after listening to concerns about traffic flow and safety the plan was changed based on the comments that citizens had so do you go back to having you know, having it cut through the steepest areas and disturbing the dirt more and perhaps having more runoff and more concerns with traffic or do you go with the long cul-de-sac? Maybe there’s another plan but this is a, it’s a very unique property. I don’t have enough engineering background to come up with another plan but this is the one that we have to make a recommendation on today. Aller: Additional comments? I’ll entertain a motion. Randall: We can make a motion really quick but will all our comments be forwarded to the City Council? Aller: Yeah the verbatim Minutes will be received. Randall: Okay perfect. Aller: It’s part of the package and part of, and which is the transparency that we all have and so I’ll add on to the comments that have been made before too that I would hope that everybody present, everybody watching, we’re dealing with, when we’re dealing with water issues and canopy issues and I think I heard the Mayor say last night that she wanted us all to get up and participate so I would appreciate it if everybody would go plant a tree. Bottom line is, is that we’re always looking for somebody else to plant trees for us and we have our own yards so let’s, if we want a buffer, truly want a buffer, create one on your own property. I think that’s the best way to guarantee that you’re going to have that buffer. Protect your own property. Protect your own wetlands. Stand up for them. We are trying to do our best to stand up for the community which is why you know I vote and of course why we differ in our comments because we are diverse. We’re a diverse segment of the community. We’re from different backgrounds. From different areas in town and we look at things differently which has given us a great perspective I think over the last year as a working commission so we’re not always in lock step but I think that after discussion our votes normally are unanimous or close to it because of the fact that we’re all Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 37 looking to do what’s best for the city and if that doesn’t necessarily play out in tonight’s vote that’s fine but thank you for your participation and your comments and let’s entertain a motion and move this thing forward and see where we’re at with our recommendation to City Council. Would anyone like to take a stab at a motion? This is why a lot of times we take the one that’s on there. McGonagill: I guess Mr. Chairman I’m a little bit, help me on the Robert’s Rules of Order here a little bit. We have a motion in front of us that the planning staff has proposed to us to act on that’s on the agenda. So do we have to vote on that? Do we vote it down? I’m just, I don’t understand process as well. Aanenson: You can modify the motion. Aller: That is a motion that has been presented because it’s. Tietz: Easy to present. McGonagill: I lost my screen. I lost my screen. That’s okay Aller: It is easy for us to use because it goes through the report and provides us with that information but as we have in the past we can modify it to add comments. To add conditions. And this is a recommendation and it can be voted up or voted down depending upon how you want to present it. McGonagill: May I ask a process question? Aller: Sure. McGonagill: Okay. In the motion I don’t, I think where we’re getting hung up, I don’t think we have, I offer this as an opinion. That I don’t think we have a problem with the first state of rezoning the PUD. You know that one is fine. Where we’re getting the, where we have a lot of debate on is the number of lots. The density and the way it’s created in the plans by Pioneer Engineering. This is where we’re having I believe most of the debate so this part of the motion s okay. This part probably is okay on the wetland piece. The third piece. And then we of course have the attached Findings of Fact and recommendations so it’s this middle one if I correctly look at it where we are not having agreement on what… Aanenson: Chairman Aller if I may. All the conditions are tied to each other so once you rezone the property it’s rezoned so you’d really have to recommend denial of all of them because they’re all tied to that specific plan. That would be my recommendation. McGonagill: Okay that answers my question. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 38 Aanenson: Thank you. McGonagill: Thank you. Well then I will offer a recommendation for denial of the proposed motion that this recommend denial of the motion that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends to City Council to approve the rezoning for 191 acres from Rural Residential District (RR) to Planned Unit Development Residential (PUD-R) including PUD ordinance for Galpin Design Standards and the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the subdivision preliminary plat creating 191 lots, 3 outlots and dedication of the right-of-way as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated December 5, 2018 subject to conditions in the staff report and the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Wetland Alteration Permit of 1.28 acres of wetland impacts subject to conditions in the staff report and the Planning Commission also adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendations. Aanenson: Can I get a clarification, excuse me. So we’re recommendation on all of the issues. Is that what the intent was? McGonagill: Well I understood I couldn’t break them apart so therefore I have to. Aanenson: Okay. McGonagill: That’s what you said and I’m following. Okay. Aanenson: Again I just want to make sure I understood the motion. I’m sorry. McGonagill: Proposing the motion. Aller: So we have a motion. Do we have a second? Tietz: Second. Aller: Having a. Weick: Can I have a clarification please on the vote because I want to be perfectly clear. Aller: We have a motion with a second. Weick: So a vote for this motion is a vote against. Aller: The proposal. Weick: The proposal. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 39 McGonagill: Thank you for that because I probably had it screwed up. Aller: Okay? McGonagill: Thank you Commissioner Weick. Aller: So having a motion and a second and a vote in favor of the motion is for a denial of the presentation. McGonagill: Correct. Aller: Everybody okay with that? Any other discussion based on that? McGonagill moved, Tietz seconded that the Planning Commission recommends denial of the proposed motion that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends to City Council to approve the rezoning for 191 acres from Rural Residential District (RR) to Planned Unit Development Residential (PUD-R) including PUD ordinance for Galpin Design Standards; and the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the subdivision preliminary plat creating 191 lots, 3 outlots and dedication of the right-of-way as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated December 5, 2018 subject to conditions in the staff report; and the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Wetland Alteration Permit of 1.28 acres of wetland impacts subject to conditions in the staff report; and the Planning Commission adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendations. Commissioners McGonagill, Tietz and Randall voted in favor of the motion for denial. Commissioners Madsen, Weick and Aller voted against the motion for denial. The motion is tied with a vote of 3 to 3. Aller: So we have a 3-3 which is not unexpected in a situation like this and that’s why we toss it to the people who make the big bucks. With our thanks to the community for their presentations. Please note that you have been heard. We are still listening. We know that the developer is listening. The City is listening and this matter will go to the City Council on what date Kate? Aanenson: The 11th. Aller: The 11th. Aanenson: 11th of February. Aller: The 11th of February. Let’s take a minute while the room clears. There was a short recess at this point in the meeting. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 40 APPROAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Weick noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated December 4, 2018 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. Aller: Anybody wishing to make comments? I just on behalf of the commissioners here would like to welcome and congratulate the present City Council as constituted and we look forward to them looking at our recommendations. Although they’re not going to be thrilled with this and of course this is not our doing. It’s not their doing. It’s the community growing and we’re all going to have growing pains so we appreciate them and on the 11th I’m sure they’ll work through a lot of the information that we provided them. Also congratulations to the Red Birds who were champions and they had their presentation or announcement last night at the City Council meeting and I think that’s about it. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aanenson: I’ve got a council update, if that’s alright. Aller: Please. Aanenson: Okay. So the council did approve the final draft of the Comprehensive Plan. It is up for review so just like you have procedures, they have 15 days to determine if it’s complete. There’s a couple things that didn’t align between engineering, looking at some modeling for sewer and what we had for projections so those were all straightened out so we’re in the process. So they also our plan will then also go to what they call a community development committee to get that approved so they’ll write their final recommendation so we anticipate that happening. The flood plain ordinance was adopted. Through that whole process we tried to keep pubic involvement and appreciate Commissioner Madsen’s help on that but we didn’t have anybody show up to any of the hearings but again we tried hard to do some outreach on that one too. The Holasek Farms, the business park was approved by the City Council. It is in the final plat. I did mention that I did meet with the developer of that and so that is hopefully they’ll be closing in February. I think the middle lot’s been eliminated based on poor soils but it’s going to be a very nice industrial park and they do have a tenant moving in there so we’ll probably see some work on that this spring. McGonagill: Kate question on that and my favorite subject is the pipeline. Any, heard anything from Magellan? What are they talking about that? Aanenson: That building’s being completely removed in proximity to that so I haven’t heard anything more on that. I just found out about that. McGonagill: You mean they’re removing that building completely? Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 41 Aanenson: Completely yep. McGonagill: They’re not building the building in the back. Aanenson: Correct in the middle. In the far back but not in the middle so there’s the Magellan Pipeline has got 100 feet on either side of it now so. McGonagill: So will it still be between the two buildings? Aanenson: Yes. McGonagill: Okay. Aanenson: But significantly. Like I say with the middle building being gone it’s. McGonagill: Yeah well it’s mostly about you know the. Aanenson: Yeah they’re not grading or anything in that area now so it’ll be left… Tietz: Is that a phase decision by Mark? Aanenson: It’s really poor soils. If you remember there was a lot of stockpiling. Tietz: Yeah. Aanenson: Yeah there’s a lot of stockpiling to correct those soils so I think just the cost of all that was just, so that’s just going to be eliminated. Tietz: So it’s gone away forever? Aanenson: Yeah. So it’ll just be, yeah correct Aller: So it’s gone. Aanenson: Just the two buildings. McGonagill: There will be, there will be a building on one side of the pipeline and there will be another building on the other side. Aanenson: Correct. McGonagill: So they will have to still go through. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 42 Aanenson: Correct. McGonagill: Padding and crossing, how they cross that. Aanenson: Yeah, yep, yep, yep. But I mean the building, the second building…second building is quite a bit further, closer to the pipeline so now there’s a significant, a couple hundred feet but yes, they still have to go through all the requirements yep. McGonagill: Yeah okay. Well just something to be sensitive to. Aanenson: Sure. McGonagill: Is for them to insure they get a good engineering study of how many, how much point load they can have. They need a pad above that pipeline to build a ramp above it so they can spread the load with the dumpsters. Aanenson: Yeah, yeah. McGonagill: But after the meeting we can talk about that Aanenson: Yep, yep. Yeah. And then the Venue project, they did the final, the registered land survey. This is the first time I’ve done one of those where it’s actually, it’s an abstract in the air because the final plat for the Venue is actually the Aldi building so the had to wait for the parking ramp to get built and then they do the survey based on that parking ramp so that’s been done and recorded. They actually pulled the permit for the Aldi although we don’t anticipate that starting until April so that will be under construction. So that’s what I had for, so the council will have, just had their first meeting last year and there wasn’t much action item on that. I take that back. Paisley Park. They did approve, you looked at that, the temporary to allow liquor at those 12 special events, yep. Aller: Special permits right Aanenson: Yep. Aller: Special events. Aanenson: Correct yep so that’s on there. I do want to tell you we do have a meeting in 2 weeks and there’s a variance on and that’s up in the Lake Minnewashta area and then we also are going to give you our year end report. There’s some exciting things in our year end report. We did a lot of development so we’ll talk about that. Aller: Great. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 15, 2019 43 Aanenson: And I did mention to the 3 people that their terms are up so I’ll be sending out notices reminding you if you want to reapply so we’ll be doing those interviews. I think that second meeting in February. We’re trying to get those to the City Council. I think they’re looking at maybe trying to block out a couple of meetings to do more at once instead of trying to plug up all the work sessions so I’ll let you know about that. Aller: I think it helps give them a better idea too. Aanenson: Yes, right because they’re just kind of, when they interview over a month they kind of you know, yeah so I think that will be good so that’s what I’ve got. Just as a side note I’m hearing rumors about possibly Avienda kind of starting to rumble up a little bit now too so I’ve been getting some inquiries from the developer and some of the residents so, so if you recall on that one we have to go back and amend that PUD. They’re going to shift up some of the internal uses in there an move those around and so you’ll have to look at that PUD again too so, they got approval to do the grading so now they’re working on that. Then they can come forward with a PUD amendment so anticipate that so. So that’s all I have. McGonagill: I’ll just compliment how the Panera turned out next to Chick-fil-A. Aanenson: Oh thank you. McGonagill: I didn’t really have a, I was really concerned a little it about the parking and traffic flow in there. It turned out okay. Aanenson: Yeah it looks nice. It’s always hard to visualize something when you see it and those are compact sites right there. Those retrofits of substandard storm water measurements so they’re very complex so yeah they just got their final CO. Aller: And that was the big delay with Chick-fil-A. Was working that underground. McGonagill: I know they, of course I wasn’t on the commission then but they dug one heck of a hole when they were working through all that. Aller: Yeah. Well thank you one and all for a difficult but good meeting. We’re at our finest when we have the community present and asking us the hard questions and I look forward to working with you. On that motion to adjourn. Commissioner McGonagill moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JANUARY 15, 2019 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Steve Weick, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, Mark Randall, and Michael McGonagill MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Todd Hoffman, Park and Rec Director; and Erik Henriksen, Project Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Mary & Allan Olson 7461 Windmill Drive Tim Nordberg 2126 Majestic Way Neil & Abby Ellis 7284 Bent Bow Trail Mauricio Goes 6930 Ruby Lane Matt Chambers 2169 Red Fox Circle Dake Chatfield 2700 Majestic Way Mehdi Ayouche 2102 Majestic Way Ann Nye 1641 West 63rd Street Bill & Jill Borrell 2300 Longacres Drive Jim Freebersyser & Michelle Treptau 6935 Ruby Lane Larry Stueve 7324 Fawn Hill Road Cherree Theisen 2072 Majestic Way Scott Wosje 7125 Northwood Court Laurie Susla 7008 Dakota Avenue Courtney Jennings 7406 Moccasin Trail Josh Kimber 2060 Majestic Way Melissa Murrujo 1973 Topaz Drive Jay Gerczak 1941 Topaz Drive Geri Stewart 1893 Topaz Drive PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER REZONING PARCEL (GALPIN SITE) FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL (RR) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PUD-R), WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT, AND SUBDIVISION OF 191 ACRES INCLUDING THE PRESERVATION OF APPROXIMATELY 100 ACRES AND THE CREATION OF 191 LOTS. Planning Commission Summary – January 15, 2019 2 Kate Aanenson presented planning aspects of the staff report on this item. Todd Hoffman addressed park dedication and plans to expand Lake Ann Park with the use of density transfer. Erik Henriksen discussed engineering aspects of the plan regarding easements, right-of-way, streets, retaining walls, and utilities such as sanitary sewer and watermains. Commissioner Tietz discussed his fundamental issue with the density transfer and how the plan was tested and verified. He also asked for architectural variation on the front facades of the homes. Commissioner McGonagill asked for clarification on sizing of catch basins, how runoff will be handled and turning movements onto Galpin Boulevard from the development. Commissioner Weick asked about the amount of earth being moved, and the difference between gross and net acreage numbers. Commissioner Madsen asked how overall density, steep slopes on the north, through traffic, width of the lots on the south end, buffers and water runoff to the south neighborhood were addressed. Joe Jablonski, representing Lennar Corporation as the Director of Entitlements and Forward Planning, addressed issues related to elimination of the street connection to the north, lot sizes, architectural styles, grading plan, phasing plan for final plats, and meeting neighborhood park needs. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. Geri Stewart, 1893 Topaz Drive expressed concern with the buffer between her property and new houses being built and requested a conservancy buffer. Dake Chatfield, 2200 Majestic Way, which is on the south side of the property, expressed concern with the property being clear cut and the amount of buffer being provided. Scott Wosje, 7125 Northwood Court, speaking as President of the Longacres Homeowners Board, explained that from the perspective of the people who live in the Longacres neighborhood this development is not good for them. Josh Kimber, 2060 Majestic Way explained that after this item was before the Planning Commission and City Council he expected to see 3 plans as requested, and that the lots abutting the southern border are not of similar size to existing lots. Cherree Theisen, 2072 Majestic Way discussed having been one of the first houses on Majestic Way and being told that the stand of trees on Prince’s property would not be removed when the property sold, expressed concern with runoff from this property onto her yard. Jim Freebersyser, 6935 Ruby Lane suggested that the City buy this property to end the nonsense of development and say no to this PUD. Todd Simning, 2145 Wynsong Lane and speaking as a builder/developer, noted he is pro development but would recommend tabling or not approving the item until outstanding engineering issues are addressed and understood. Chairman Aller closed the public hearing. Joe Jablonski addressed issues such as density and tree removal. After comments and discussion by commission members the following motion was made. McGonagill moved, Tietz seconded that the Planning Commission recommends denial of the proposed motion that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends to City Council to approve the rezoning for 191 acres from Rural Residential District (RR) to Planned Unit Development Residential (PUD-R) including PUD ordinance for Galpin Design Standards; and the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the subdivision preliminary plat creating 191 lots, 3 outlots and dedication of the right-of-way as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated December 5, 2018 subject to conditions in the staff report; and the Chanhassen Planning Commission Planning Commission Summary – January 15, 2019 3 recommends that the City Council approve the Wetland Alteration Permit of 1.28 acres of wetland impacts subject to conditions in the staff report; and the Planning Commission adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendations. Commissioners McGonagill, Tietz and Randall voted in favor of the motion for denial. Commissioners Madsen, Weick and Aller voted against the motion for denial. The motion is tied with a vote of 3 to 3. There was a short recess at this point in the meeting. APPROAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Weick noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated December 4, 2018 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. Chairman Aller congratulated the new members to the City Council and commented that the Chanhassen Red Birds were announced as State Champions. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Kate Aanenson discussed the City Council action update items and future Planning Commission agenda schedule. Commissioner McGonagill moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Approve 2019 Key Financial Strategies and Legislative Priorities Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3. Prepared By Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Manager File No: ADM076 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts the 2019 Key Financial Strategies and 2019 Legislative Priorities as attached.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Since 2003, the Chanhassen City Council has established annual goals and key financial strategies (KFS).These goals and strategies cover a broad spectrum of items that the council feels need the most attention over the next 12 months. The City Council concentrates on four strategic areas: Competitiveness Strengthen the City's Financial Position Planning for the City's Infrastructure Enhance Local Tax Base This year's goals have been developed through a series of meetings between City Council and staff throughout January. The final proposed 2019 Key Financial Strategies are attached. Additionally, staff has reviewed previous years' legislative priorities and have discussed these issues with surrounding communities and legislators. These priorities have also been compared to City Council's KFS list for 2019. Attached is the draft of 2019 Legislative Priorities for City Council consideration. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the 2019 Key Financial Strategies, and that staff be directed to prepare the necessary information for the city council to review these goals throughout the year. Additionally, staff recommends approval of the 2019 Legislative Priorities and that staff be directed to share these goals with legislative representatives. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 11, 2019SubjectApprove 2019 Key Financial Strategies and Legislative PrioritiesSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3.Prepared By Chelsea Petersen, Assistant CityManager File No: ADM076PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts the 2019 Key Financial Strategies and 2019 Legislative Priorities as attached.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYSince 2003, the Chanhassen City Council has established annual goals and key financial strategies (KFS).These goalsand strategies cover a broad spectrum of items that the council feels need the most attention over the next 12 months.The City Council concentrates on four strategic areas:CompetitivenessStrengthen the City's Financial PositionPlanning for the City's InfrastructureEnhance Local Tax BaseThis year's goals have been developed through a series of meetings between City Council and staff throughoutJanuary. The final proposed 2019 Key Financial Strategies are attached.Additionally, staff has reviewed previous years' legislative priorities and have discussed these issues with surroundingcommunities and legislators. These priorities have also been compared to City Council's KFS list for 2019. Attachedis the draft of 2019 Legislative Priorities for City Council consideration.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends approval of the 2019 Key Financial Strategies, and that staff be directed to prepare the necessary information for the city council to review these goals throughout the year. Additionally, staff recommends approval of the 2019 Legislative Priorities and that staff be directed to share these goals with legislative representatives. ATTACHMENTS: 2019 KFS List 2019 Legsislative Priorities 1 City of Chanhassen 2019 Annual Goals and Key Financial Strategies Since 2003, the Chanhassen City Council has established annual goals and key financial strategies (KFS). The goals/strategies cover a broad spectrum and are items the council feels need the most attention over the coming year. The City Council concentrates on four strategic areas and developed the 2019 goals through a series of meetings with staff in January. The final results are: COMPETITIVENESS Create an environment for innovation and change, building on our strengths, creativity and skills: • Increase Staffed Fire Department Hours (Duty Crew Program): The Chanhassen Fire Department has experienced a steady increase in call volume over the past several years, creating an increased demand on the 45 paid on-call firefighters. Currently duty crews are utilized primarily between 5pm and 10pm, and the program has been received very well by the department. Firefighters are essentially able to schedule their response times by signing up for duty crews, and then spend evenings off not worrying about responding to fire calls. Staff would like to consider expansion of this program to include overnight hours, as that is one of the highest risk times and often some of the lowest response times. Scheduling shifts would improve retention by decreasing “all calls” during overnight hours, and ensure that there is always a set crew available to respond overnight. • Consider Implementation of a Lodging Tax: With this tax, the Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce could help better market Chanhassen and local attractions as a destination for both metro residents and visitors in town for large-scale events (Final Four, Super Bowl, etc.). • Implement a Mental Health Awareness Program: Work with outside organizations including, but not limited to: CCSO, Mental Health Crisis Team, Make it OK, SAVE, local schools, etc. to create and implement an outreach and education program. Tasks could include a review of service levels and expectations from CCSO, arrange and host annual or biannual mental health workshops, bring awareness to city/county/state organizational resources, and reduce stigma surrounding mental health. STRENGTHEN THE CITY’S FINANCIAL POSITION Provide financial stability and resources necessary to achieve the city’s vision by exercising financial stewardship, implementing best practices, and utilizing long-term financial planning tools: • Conduct a Thorough Review of all Utility Fund Fees: Compare our operating and connection utility fund fees compared to KFS Cities and neighboring communities. The 2 City of Chanhassen works to find a balance between the competitiveness of fees and the long-term financial stability of the utility funds. • Perform a Pavement Management Program Deep Dive: Staff and City Council will review the current pavement conditions throughout the city and the full OCI map to see specific problem areas. Staff will also review and provide an update on future planned projects and the potential schedule/sequence. Staff should also provide an opportunity to thoroughly review all potential funding sources. PLANNING FOR THE CITY’S INFRASTRUCTURE Create solutions for managing existing infrastructure and future growth in our community while preserving a sustainable quality-of-life and protecting the environment: • Address Trail Gaps and Trail Crossing Safety Issues: During the Parks System Master Planning process, 34 trail gaps and 16 trail crossing safety concerns were identified in Chanhassen. By addressing these concerns, the overall pedestrian safety and mobility throughout Chanhassen can be greatly improved. • Review the Practice for Addressing Citizen Requests for Traffic Safety Concerns: Staff would like to discuss current practices and standard traffic safety measures with council, and discuss whether changes need to be made. Once completed, staff and council will have the same procedure and standard responses so that residents hear a consistent message from all city sources. • Study and Consider Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Initiatives: Staff plans to study methods for reducing I&I of groundwater and storm water into the sanitary sewer system, educate the public and council on the importance of reducing I&I, and develop a plan to address issues and reduce I&I. ENHANCE LOCAL TAX BASE Enhance the Comprehensive Plan with Current Goals and Policies, and Assess the Impact: • The City of Chanhassen has ongoing economic development goals and projects throughout the year. The Chanhassen City Council will address each of these goals throughout the year as part of the regular work session schedule. The city is committed to providing public services in the most efficient manner possible and maximizing the public’s return on their investment. City of Chanhassen 2019 Legislative Priorities 1. Support “Opt-Out” Suburban Transit Agencies: Chanhassen supports opt-out cities and suburban transit agencies, in concurrence with the findings of the Office of the Legislative Auditors January 2011 Governance of Transit Report. Creation of these agencies provided residents and businesses with a desired service that met their needs while maintaining financial and management controls. The State should refrain from infringing on the ability of local agencies to provide and control bus services for the benefit of area businesses and residents. Suburban riders are an integral part of the suburban transit system. 2. Unfunded Mandates: Chanhassen opposes both current and future statutory changes that create mandated tasks that require new or added local costs without a corresponding funding mechanism. Without a funding source, Chanhassen is potentially in the position of having to increase property taxes and/or fees. These unfunded mandates add to the responsibilities for cities and the ability to fund traditional service needs. 3. Local Governance & Planning: The city strongly supports participation in cooperative arrangements, but strongly opposes any effort to weaken the ability of local governments to provide the best services and benefits for their communities (levy limits, unfunded mandates, cooperative purchasing, and ability to grant variances). Local budgets are subject to intense public scrutiny. Inflation alone forces cities to spend more money to maintain current service levels. The people who know what is best for this city are the people who live and work here. 4. Environmental: The current permitting processes are too time-consuming and can slow down development processes. Research should be conducted by both city and their jurisdictional staff on streamlining one or more of the following processes: NPDES, MS4, Non-degradation, Wetland Conservation Act, and Clean Water Act requirements, EPA Standards and Regulatory Rules, etc. Additionally, the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) is proposing a contradictory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) rule change that significantly reduces the threshold of wetland impact from a 2.5 acres to a 1 acre limit for projects requiring preparation of an EAW document. This would increase the number EAW's (and costs of projects) that will need to be prepared. This change goes against the State's streamlining goals. Additionally, the proposed rule change does not increase environmental protection because it duplicates environmental review efforts already required by state and federal regulations governing work in wetlands and public waters. 5. TH 5 Project Improvements (West of TH 41 to Norwood Young America): This is a joint project with MnDOT, Carver County, and the Cities of Victoria, Waconia, Norwood/Young America, and Chanhassen. Problem: No funding or schedule to make the corridor four lanes. 6. Highway 212: Continue development of Highway 212 from County Road 147 on the Chaska/Carver border to the City of Cologne. Problem: No construction funding source secured. 7. Fiscal Disparities: Explore modifications to the fiscal disparities program in order to reduce the imbalances inherent in the current formula. The fiscal disparities program was created in 1971, and although the population of the metro area has grown by over 1.5M people since that time, the formula for fiscal disparities has remained the same. As the population grows, the need for retail services to support residents grows with it. Individual cities and their property taxpayers take the lead in developing regional, retail, and service assets that support residents and visitors to the area. In addition to the cost of planning and developing these assets, retail and service industries consume significant city services, particularly in the area of public safety, as well as impose significant burdens on local roads, bridges, and other transportation infrastructure. A 2012 report commissioned by the Minnesota Legislature demonstrates that the property taxes generated by these retail services do not pay for the additional services they require, an imbalance that is increased by the fiscal disparities program. Local taxpayers in communities that host regional retail assets are forced to subsidize the costs of city and county services while taxpayers in communities that use, but do not develop, these assets have their tax rates lowered. LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES FOR OTHER AGENCIES: Metro Cities 2019 Legislative Policies League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policies g:\admin\tg\legislative priorities\2019\2019 legislative priorities.docx CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Approve 2019/2020 Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard Contract Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4. Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Superintendent File No: RA100D PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a twoyear contract (2019/2020) with Minnetonka Public School District 276 for Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard Services in the amount of $33,670 per year." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed and discussed the twoyear (2019/2020) Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard Contract at their January 22, 2019 meeting. A motion was made by Commissioner Echternacht and seconded by Commissioner Boettcher recommending that the City Council approve the 2019/2020 twoyear contract (Option A) with Minnetonka Public School District 276 for Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard Services in the amount of $33,670 per year. This amount is included in the 2019 Lake Ann Park Operations Budget (1540) and will be submitted as part of the 2020 Lake Ann Park Operations Budget. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract 2. Park & Recreation Commission Staff Report dated January 22, 2019 83758 Page 1 of 4 TWO (2) YEAR AGREEMENT FOR SUMMER SERVICES AT LAKE ANN BEACH - SUMMER 2019 & 2020 AGREEMENT made this 11th day of February, 2019 between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and the MINNETONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS (the "Contractor"). WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen has requested that Contractor provide a Lifeguard Service Program during the 2019 and 2020 Swimming Seasons for Lake Ann Beach. WHEREAS, the Contractor agrees to provide Lifeguard Services for Lake Ann Beach. NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. CONTRACTOR'S SERVICES. A. Lifeguard Service. The Contractor agrees to provide the City with qualified and Red Cross certified personnel to lifeguard above stated beach from June 1 through August 11, 2019 and June 6 through August 16, 2020 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. daily (weather permitting). B. Contractor agrees to provide: 1) an appropriate number of lifeguards on duty at all times, according to any applicable industry standards or regulations; 2) lifeguard staff with ongoing in-service training during the summer season; 3) supervision of lifeguard personnel; 4) all necessary safety equipment for the Lifeguard Services including: rescue tubes, first aid kits, reaching pole, rescue board 2. CITY OBLIGATIONS. A. Beach. The City agrees to provide a clean and well-maintained beach and beach area as stated in this agreement. This includes defined swimming boundaries; clean restrooms and lifeguard station. The City agrees to provide a working telephone, lifeguard chairs, umbrella, and megaphone. B. 2019 Payment. The City agrees to pay Contractor a total of $33,670 divided into two equal payments of $16,835 on July 10 and August 10, 2019 in return for lifeguard services. C. 2020 Payment. The City agrees to pay Contractor a total of $33,670 divided into two equal payments of $16,835 on July 10 and August 10, 2020 in return for lifeguard services. 83758 Page 2 of 4 3. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees and officers subject to limitations of Chapter 466 of Minnesota Statutes from any and all liability, loss, costs, damages and expenses including but not limited to property damage and personal injury, including death, which arise in connection with any acts or omissions of Contractor's employees. The City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Contractor and its employees, officers and agents from any and all liability, loss, costs, damages and expenses including but not limited to property damage and personal injury, including death, which arise in connection with the City's performance of this Contract or in connection with any acts or omissions of City employees subject to limitations and immunities subject to Chapter 466. 4. REPORTS. Contractor will provide the City with all necessary information relating to the Lifeguard Services provided in order for the City to properly maintain the beach. On an as need basis the Aquatics Manager or Aquatics Supervisor will report to the City representative in regards to incidents and/or accidents. At the end of the season (October 2019 & October 2020) the Contractor will provide the City will a full report of beach activity during the season. 5. LIABILITY. Employees of the Contractor and all other persons engaged by the Contractor in the performance of any work or services required, volunteered, or provided for herein to be performed by Contractor shall not be considered employees of the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged in any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the Contractor, and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees so engaged in any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the Contractor to the full extent permitted by law, actions by the parties pursuant to this Agreement are intended to be and shall be construed as a "cooperative activity" and it is the intent of the parties that they shall be deemed a "single governmental unit" for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subd. l; provided further that for purposes of that statute, each party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for the acts or omissions of the other party. 6. INSURANCE. The City is responsible for obtaining property and liability coverage for the cities’ beaches. Contractor will maintain professional liability and comprehensive general liability coverage for all employees in an amount consistent with Chapter 466 of the Minnesota Statutes. 7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. Notwithstanding the date of the signature of the parties to this Agreement, upon acceptance by all parties, this Agreement shall be deemed to be effective upon signature by all parties and shall remain in effect until October 1, 2019 and October 1, 2020 unless earlier terminated by either party, with or without cause, upon 45 days written notice or as otherwise provided in this Agreement. 83758 Page 3 of 4 8. DEFAULT. If Contractor or City fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of this Agreement, this shall constitute a default. Unless the party in default is excused by the other party in default, the non-defaulting party may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety. 9. SUBCONTRACTORS. Contractor shall not enter into any subcontract for performance of any services contemplated under this Agreement nor assign any interest in this Agreement without the prior written approval of the City and subject to such conditions and provisions as the City may deem necessary. Contractor shall be responsible for the performance of all Subcontractors. 10. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. The parties to this Agreement shall appoint an authorized representative for the purpose of administration of this Agreement. The authorized representative of the City is: Todd Gerhardt City Manager City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd., P.O Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1100 The authorized representative of the Contractor is as follows: Dennis Peterson, Superintendent Minnetonka Public Schools 5621 County Road 101 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone: (952) 401-5000 11. AMENDMENTS. Any amendments to this Agreement will be in writing and will be executed by the same parties who executed the original Agreement, or their successors in office. 12. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral Agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous Agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. 83758 Page 4 of 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: (SEAL) Elise Ryan, Mayor AND Todd Gerhardt, City Manager DATE: MINNETONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BY: Dennis Peterson, Superintendent DATE: PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday,January 22,2019 Subject Consider Recommendation To City Council 2019/2020 Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard Contract Section NEW BUSINESS Item No:G.2. Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer,Parks and Recreation, Recreation Superintendent File No: PROPOSED MOTION The Park and Recreation Commission recommends the City Council approve a two-year contract,2019/2020) with Minnetonka Public Schools ISD 276 for Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard Services in the amount of 33,670 per year. Approval requires a simple majority vote of members present BACKGROUND The City of Chanhassen contracts with Minnetonka Public Schools ISD 276 for the provision of lifeguard services at Lake Ann Park.The city and ISD 276 have worked together and developed a two-year contract format that has been used since 2007.The city council has endorsed the concept of a multi-year contract. The 2018 contract was: 24 hours/day x 72 days 1,728 hours per season Hours:11 am 6 pm daily Dates:June 2 through August 12 32,402 The 2019 Proposed Contract:Option A) 24 hours/day x 72 days 1,728 hours per season Hours:11 am 6 pm daily Dates:June 1 through August 11 33,670 The 2020 Proposed Contract:Option A) 24 hours/day x 72 days 1,728 hours per season Hours:11 am 6 pm daily Dates:June 6 through August 16 PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday,January 22,2019SubjectConsiderRecommendation To City Council 2019/2020 Lake Ann Park BeachLifeguardContractSectionNEWBUSINESSItemNo:G.2.Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer,Parks and Recreation,Recreation Superintendent File No:PROPOSEDMOTIONTheParkandRecreationCommission recommends the City Council approve a two-year contract,2019/2020)with Minnetonka Public Schools ISD 276 for Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard Services in the amount of 33,670peryear.Approval requires a simple majority vote of memberspresentBACKGROUNDTheCityofChanhassencontractswithMinnetonkaPublicSchools ISD 276 for the provision of lifeguard servicesatLakeAnnPark.The city and ISD 276 have worked together and developed a two-year contract format that hasbeenusedsince2007.The city council has endorsed the concept of a multi-year contract.The 2018 contract was:24 hours/day x 72 days 1,728 hours perseasonHours:11 am 6 pmdailyDates:June 2 through August 12$32,402The2019 Proposed Contract:Option A)24 hours/day x 72 days 1,728 hours perseasonHours:11 am 6 pmdailyDates:June 1 through August 11$33,670The2020Proposed Contract:Option A)24 hours/day x 72 days 1,728 hours per season Hours:11 am 6 pm daily Dates:June 6 through August 16 33,670 Attachment 2 shows a list of options developed by Minnetonka Public Schools ISD 276 for the two year 2019/2020 contract.Staff reviewed the various options and is recommending approval of Option A.This option has 24 hours daily,while the number of days the beach is open remains at 72.The proposed new two year contract amount is 33,670 per year,a 3.9%increase over the 2018 contract.The 3.9%increase is due to rising staff wages for the upcoming proposed two-year contract.This amount is included in the 2019 Lake Ann Operations Budget 1540)and will be submitted as part of the 2020 Lake Ann Park Operations Budget. A representative from Minnetonka Aquatics will be present at the January 22 meeting to review the options and answer the commission’s questions. RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission recommends the City Council approve a two-year contract Option A)for 2019/2020)with Minnetonka Public Schools ISD 276 for Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard Services in the amount of 33,670 per year. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Lake Ann Lifeguard Coverage 2.Lifeguard Service Proposal Options 3.Lifeguard Contract 2019/2020 2019-20 Lake Ann Lifeguard Coverage 11:00 AM-12:00 PM: 2 guards 6 hours 6 hours 6 hours 6 hours 11:00 X X 11:30 X X 12:00 X X X X 12:30 X X X X 1:00 X X X X 12:00 PM-5:00 PM: 3 guards 1:30 X X X X 2:00 X X X X 2:30 X X X X 3:00 X X X X 3:30 X X X X 4:00 X X X X 5:00 PM-6:00 PM: 2 guards 4:30 X X X X 5:00 X X 5:30 X X 6:00 City of Chanhassen Beach Options 2019-20 Two Year Contract Option A: same service as 2018 24 hr/day x 72 days = 1728 hours Total hours: 1728 x $19.485 = $33,670.00 each year Option B: same service as 2018 24 hrs/day x 72 days = 1728 hours Total hours: 1728 x $19.485 = $33,670.00 each year 2019 invoice = $32,670.00 2020 invoice = $34,670.00 could choose other similar price structure to lesson increase for 2019* Option C: 30 minutes less in coverage each day i.e. 11:30 AM-6:00 PM or 11:00 AM-5:30 PM 23.0 hr/day x 72 days = 1656 hours Total hours: 1656 x $19.485 = $32,267.16 each year Option D: reduce from 72 to 68 days of service for 2019 and 2020 24 hr/day x 68 days = 1632 hours Total hours: 1632 x $19.485 = $31,799.52 each year could increase number of days by $467.64 each day* Option E: 60 minutes less in coverage each day i.e. 12:00 PM-6:00 PM 22.0 hr/day x 72 days = 1584 hours Total hours: 1584 x $19.485 = $30,864.24 each year 2017-18 agreement was for $32,402.00 each year* 83758 Page 1 of 4 TWO (2) YEAR AGREEMENT FOR SUMMER SERVICES AT LAKE ANN BEACH - SUMMER 2019 & 2020 AGREEMENT made this 11th day of February, 2019 between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and the MINNETONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS (the "Contractor"). WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen has requested that Contractor provide a Lifeguard Service Program during the 2019 and 2020 Swimming Seasons for Lake Ann Beach. WHEREAS, the Contractor agrees to provide Lifeguard Services for Lake Ann Beach. NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. CONTRACTOR'S SERVICES. A. Lifeguard Service. The Contractor agrees to provide the City with qualified and Red Cross certified personnel to lifeguard above stated beach from June 1 through August 11, 2019 and June 6 through August 16, 2020 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. daily (weather permitting). B. Contractor agrees to provide: 1) an appropriate number of lifeguards on duty at all times, according to any applicable industry standards or regulations; 2) lifeguard staff with ongoing in-service training during the summer season; 3) supervision of lifeguard personnel; 4) all necessary safety equipment for the Lifeguard Services including: rescue tubes, first aid kits, reaching pole, rescue board 2. CITY OBLIGATIONS. A. Beach. The City agrees to provide a clean and well-maintained beach and beach area as stated in this agreement. This includes defined swimming boundaries; clean restrooms and lifeguard station. The City agrees to provide a working telephone, lifeguard chairs, umbrella, and megaphone. B. 2019 Payment. The City agrees to pay Contractor a total of $33,670 divided into two equal payments of $16,835 on July 10 and August 10, 2019 in return for lifeguard services. C. 2020 Payment. The City agrees to pay Contractor a total of $33,670 divided into two equal payments of $16,835 on July 10 and August 10, 2020 in return for lifeguard services. 83758 Page 2 of 4 3. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees and officers subject to limitations of Chapter 466 of Minnesota Statutes from any and all liability, loss, costs, damages and expenses including but not limited to property damage and personal injury, including death, which arise in connection with any acts or omissions of Contractor's employees. The City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Contractor and its employees, officers and agents from any and all liability, loss, costs, damages and expenses including but not limited to property damage and personal injury, including death, which arise in connection with the City's performance of this Contract or in connection with any acts or omissions of City employees subject to limitations and immunities subject to Chapter 466. 4. REPORTS. Contractor will provide the City with all necessary information relating to the Lifeguard Services provided in order for the City to properly maintain the beach. On an as need basis the Aquatics Manager or Aquatics Supervisor will report to the City representative in regards to incidents and/or accidents. At the end of the season (October 2019 & October 2020) the Contractor will provide the City will a full report of beach activity during the season. 5. LIABILITY. Employees of the Contractor and all other persons engaged by the Contractor in the performance of any work or services required, volunteered, or provided for herein to be performed by Contractor shall not be considered employees of the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged in any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the Contractor, and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees so engaged in any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the Contractor to the full extent permitted by law, actions by the parties pursuant to this Agreement are intended to be and shall be construed as a "cooperative activity" and it is the intent of the parties that they shall be deemed a "single governmental unit" for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subd. l; provided further that for purposes of that statute, each party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for the acts or omissions of the other party. 6. INSURANCE. The City is responsible for obtaining property and liability coverage for the cities’ beaches. Contractor will maintain professional liability and comprehensive general liability coverage for all employees in an amount consistent with Chapter 466 of the Minnesota Statutes. 7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. Notwithstanding the date of the signature of the parties to this Agreement, upon acceptance by all parties, this Agreement shall be deemed to be effective upon signature by all parties and shall remain in effect until October 1, 2019 and October 1, 2020 unless earlier terminated by either party, with or without cause, upon 45 days written notice or as otherwise provided in this Agreement. 83758 Page 3 of 4 8. DEFAULT. If Contractor or City fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of this Agreement, this shall constitute a default. Unless the party in default is excused by the other party in default, the non-defaulting party may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety. 9. SUBCONTRACTORS. Contractor shall not enter into any subcontract for performance of any services contemplated under this Agreement nor assign any interest in this Agreement without the prior written approval of the City and subject to such conditions and provisions as the City may deem necessary. Contractor shall be responsible for the performance of all Subcontractors. 10. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. The parties to this Agreement shall appoint an authorized representative for the purpose of administration of this Agreement. The authorized representative of the City is: Todd Gerhardt City Manager City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd., P.O Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1100 The authorized representative of the Contractor is as follows: Dennis Peterson, Superintendent Minnetonka Public Schools 5621 County Road 101 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone: (952) 401-5000 11. AMENDMENTS. Any amendments to this Agreement will be in writing and will be executed by the same parties who executed the original Agreement, or their successors in office. 12. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral Agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous Agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. 83758 Page 4 of 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: SEAL) Elise Ryan, Mayor AND Todd Gerhardt, City Manager DATE: MINNETONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BY: Dennis Peterson, Superintendent DATE: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Brent Carron Section VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Item No: E.2. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ATTACHMENTS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject JoAnn Syverson Section VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Item No: E.3. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ATTACHMENTS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Key Financial Strategy: Review the Practice for Addressing Citizen Requests for Traffic Safety Concerns Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: F.1. Prepared By Paul Oehme Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: BACKGROUND The city from time to time receives calls from concerned citizens regarding traffic safety. The City of Chanhassen, along with Carver County Sheriff's Department responds to neighborhood traffic and pedestrian safety concerns. Traffic concerns may include such things as speeding, cutthrough traffic, sight distance obstructions, or other safety requests. Staff reviews each request to determine the measured response to each individual request. For trafficrelated requests, staff refers to the Minnesota Department of Transportation guidelines to determine when signs or other traffic elements may warrant installation. Staff will be reviewing the city’s practice on traffic safety requests with the City Council. Speeding Concerns Public residential streets within the City of Chanhassen have a speed limit of 30 mph even if speed limit signs are not posted. Speed limits are set by state statutes that cities/counties must follow. Decisions on changing speeds are based on speed studies that require MnDOT's approval. Things to be aware of: Very often, speedrelated complaints are due to someone's perception of a vehicle's speed rather than the actual speed.Followup speed studies have shown most of the time speeds are generally being followed. Reducing the speed limit is unlikely to reduce speeds as most drivers travel roadways at a speed they are comfortable with based on their perception of roadway conditions such as road width, pedestrian presence, parked vehicles, and obstructions on the side of the road. Installing a speed limit sign in a residential area may advertise that a given speed is acceptable and could instead increase the average speed. Things that can be done: In some cases, educating drivers can help to reduce or eliminate a speeding problem. The city can utilize a variety of education tools to address a speeding problem on a local road. Some of the methods used include: Speed trailer Public awareness campaigns Website announcement of speeding problem area and targeted enforcement Officer stops and warnings Speak with the neighbors they are typically contributing to the issue. Take advantage of community events CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 11, 2019SubjectKey Financial Strategy: Review the Practice for Addressing Citizen Requests for Traffic SafetyConcernsSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: F.1.Prepared By Paul Oehme Public Works Director/CityEngineer File No: BACKGROUNDThe city from time to time receives calls from concerned citizens regarding traffic safety. The City of Chanhassen,along with Carver County Sheriff's Department responds to neighborhood traffic and pedestrian safety concerns.Traffic concerns may include such things as speeding, cutthrough traffic, sight distance obstructions, or other safetyrequests. Staff reviews each request to determine the measured response to each individual request. For trafficrelatedrequests, staff refers to the Minnesota Department of Transportation guidelines to determine when signs or other trafficelements may warrant installation.Staff will be reviewing the city’s practice on traffic safety requests with the City Council.Speeding ConcernsPublic residential streets within the City of Chanhassen have a speed limit of 30 mph even if speed limit signs are notposted. Speed limits are set by state statutes that cities/counties must follow. Decisions on changing speeds are basedon speed studies that require MnDOT's approval.Things to be aware of:Very often, speedrelated complaints are due to someone's perception of a vehicle's speed rather than theactual speed.Followup speed studies have shown most of the time speeds are generally being followed.Reducing the speed limit is unlikely to reduce speeds as most drivers travel roadways at a speed they arecomfortable with based on their perception of roadway conditions such as road width, pedestrian presence,parked vehicles, and obstructions on the side of the road.Installing a speed limit sign in a residential area may advertise that a given speed is acceptable and could insteadincrease the average speed.Things that can be done:In some cases, educating drivers can help to reduce or eliminate a speeding problem. The city can utilize a variety ofeducation tools to address a speeding problem on a local road. Some of the methods used include:Speed trailerPublic awareness campaignsWebsite announcement of speeding problem area and targeted enforcement Officer stops and warnings Speak with the neighbors they are typically contributing to the issue. Take advantage of community events such as "National Night Out" or online neighborhood groups.The city has sent out letters to neighbors reminding them be attentive drivers and observe the speed limit. The city can verify the actual speeds to see if it is a perceived speeding problem or an actual issue by collecting speed and traffic volume counts using a pneumatic tube traffic counter. Stop Signs Stop signs are intended to assign right of way for drivers and are not speed control devices. Increasing the number of stop signs does not necessarily reduce crashes, and a sign installed in an improper location may have poor compliance rates, create driver confusion, and increase crash risk. The effectiveness of a stop sign on: Volume: Stop signs generally do not result in a reduction of traffic. Speed: Stop signs are unlikely to reduce speeds, and too many stop signs installed in one area can often lead to increases in speed between the signs as drivers try to "make up for lost time." Safety: If sight distance is poor or traffic volumes are significant and equal on all sides of the intersection, stop signs can have a positive effect on safety. However, if installed at a location that does not warrant a stop sign, or where motorists are likely to ignore them, the stop sign can lead to an increase in crash risks. Things to be aware of: If a stop sign in installed, there will be an increase in acceleration and deceleration, potentially resulting in noise impacts to the surrounding properties. Adding unnecessary and unwarranted stop signs will likely have a low effectiveness at solving the problem and could lead to compliance and safety issues. "Children At Play" Signs Some cities have posted “CHILDREN AT PLAY” signs in residential areas despite studies showing that generalized signs warning of Normal Conditions such as children in a residential area fail to achieve the desired safety benefits. "CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs may give parents and children a false sense of security as the sign is assumed to provide protection, which in reality it does not. Due to these serious considerations, federal standards no longer recommend the use of "CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs. Special conditions such as warnings of school zones, playgrounds, parks and other recreational facilities, do warrant signing as these are not easily anticipated by drivers. Below is a link to a State of Minnesota video discussing ineffective signs: https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=u94X3uVzxns&feature=youtu.be&list=PL8D3XXieDs8nM47JJOqwCqCJqgnSUs0eE Speed Bumps The City of Chanhassen does not install speed humps (bumps) on our public streets for the following reasons: Speeds may increase between humps as drivers try to make up for lost time. Noise levels may increase as drivers brake and accelerate at speed humps. Speed humps may have a negative impact on air quality and energy consumption due to increased slowing and braking. Speed humps cause delays for police and fire vehicles of 310 seconds per hump. Speeds may increase over time as drivers get used to the feel of the speed humps. Traffic volume may be diverted to adjacent streets as drivers seek alternate routes to avoid the speed humps. Some motorists may drive with their wheels in the gutter, bike lane, or road shoulder in order to minimize the impact of the humps. Maintenance activities, including snow plowing, are difficult to accomplish. Additional Information For additional traffic safety resources, please visit the city's website for Traffic CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 11, 2019SubjectKey Financial Strategy: Review the Practice for Addressing Citizen Requests for Traffic SafetyConcernsSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: F.1.Prepared By Paul Oehme Public Works Director/CityEngineer File No: BACKGROUNDThe city from time to time receives calls from concerned citizens regarding traffic safety. The City of Chanhassen,along with Carver County Sheriff's Department responds to neighborhood traffic and pedestrian safety concerns.Traffic concerns may include such things as speeding, cutthrough traffic, sight distance obstructions, or other safetyrequests. Staff reviews each request to determine the measured response to each individual request. For trafficrelatedrequests, staff refers to the Minnesota Department of Transportation guidelines to determine when signs or other trafficelements may warrant installation.Staff will be reviewing the city’s practice on traffic safety requests with the City Council.Speeding ConcernsPublic residential streets within the City of Chanhassen have a speed limit of 30 mph even if speed limit signs are notposted. Speed limits are set by state statutes that cities/counties must follow. Decisions on changing speeds are basedon speed studies that require MnDOT's approval.Things to be aware of:Very often, speedrelated complaints are due to someone's perception of a vehicle's speed rather than theactual speed.Followup speed studies have shown most of the time speeds are generally being followed.Reducing the speed limit is unlikely to reduce speeds as most drivers travel roadways at a speed they arecomfortable with based on their perception of roadway conditions such as road width, pedestrian presence,parked vehicles, and obstructions on the side of the road.Installing a speed limit sign in a residential area may advertise that a given speed is acceptable and could insteadincrease the average speed.Things that can be done:In some cases, educating drivers can help to reduce or eliminate a speeding problem. The city can utilize a variety ofeducation tools to address a speeding problem on a local road. Some of the methods used include:Speed trailerPublic awareness campaignsWebsite announcement of speeding problem area and targeted enforcementOfficer stops and warningsSpeak with the neighbors they are typically contributing to the issue. Take advantage of community eventssuch as "National Night Out" or online neighborhood groups.The city has sent out letters to neighborsreminding them be attentive drivers and observe the speed limit.The city can verify the actual speeds to see if it is a perceived speeding problem or an actual issue by collectingspeed and traffic volume counts using a pneumatic tube traffic counter.Stop SignsStop signs are intended to assign right of way for drivers and are not speed control devices. Increasing the number ofstop signs does not necessarily reduce crashes, and a sign installed in an improper location may have poor compliancerates, create driver confusion, and increase crash risk.The effectiveness of a stop sign on:Volume: Stop signs generally do not result in a reduction of traffic.Speed: Stop signs are unlikely to reduce speeds, and too many stop signs installed in one area can often lead toincreases in speed between the signs as drivers try to "make up for lost time."Safety: If sight distance is poor or traffic volumes are significant and equal on all sides of the intersection, stopsigns can have a positive effect on safety. However, if installed at a location that does not warrant a stop sign, orwhere motorists are likely to ignore them, the stop sign can lead to an increase in crash risks.Things to be aware of:If a stop sign in installed, there will be an increase in acceleration and deceleration, potentially resulting in noiseimpacts to the surrounding properties.Adding unnecessary and unwarranted stop signs will likely have a low effectiveness at solving the problem andcould lead to compliance and safety issues."Children At Play" SignsSome cities have posted “CHILDREN AT PLAY” signs in residential areas despite studies showing that generalizedsigns warning of Normal Conditions such as children in a residential area fail to achieve the desired safety benefits."CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs may give parents and children a false sense of security as the sign is assumed toprovide protection, which in reality it does not. Due to these serious considerations, federal standards no longerrecommend the use of "CHILDREN AT PLAY" signs. Special conditions such as warnings of school zones,playgrounds, parks and other recreational facilities, do warrant signing as these are not easily anticipated by drivers.Below is a link to a State of Minnesota video discussing ineffective signs:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u94X3uVzxns&feature=youtu.be&list=PL8D3XXieDs8nM47JJOqwCqCJqgnSUs0eESpeed BumpsThe City of Chanhassen does not install speed humps (bumps) on our public streets for the following reasons:Speeds may increase between humps as drivers try to make up for lost time.Noise levels may increase as drivers brake and accelerate at speed humps.Speed humps may have a negative impact on air quality and energy consumption due to increased slowing andbraking.Speed humps cause delays for police and fire vehicles of 310 seconds per hump.Speeds may increase over time as drivers get used to the feel of the speed humps.Traffic volume may be diverted to adjacent streets as drivers seek alternate routes to avoid the speed humps.Some motorists may drive with their wheels in the gutter, bike lane, or road shoulder in order to minimize theimpact of the humps.Maintenance activities, including snow plowing, are difficult to accomplish.Additional Information For additional traffic safety resources, please visit the city's website for Traffic Concerns: http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/437/TrafficConcerns. Residents can also report neighborhood traffic concerns using the website's Request Tracker, which can be found here: http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/RequestTracker.aspx . For concerns about speeding or other traffic violations, all inquiries should be directed to the Carver County Sheriff's Office nonemergency line, 9523611231. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Review of Claims Paid 02112019 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: I.1. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on February 11, 2019: Check Numbers Amounts 170288 – 170366 $217,021.36 ACH Payments $850,231.60 Total All Claims $1,067,252.96 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 2/1/2019 11:24 AM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount CAPAGE CAP AGENCY 01/24/2019 0.00 2,100.00170288 DAVWEE David Weekley Homes 01/24/2019 0.00 2,560.00170289 DELTOO DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01/24/2019 0.00 335.36170290 DULSAL Dultmeier Sales LLC 01/24/2019 0.00 104.45170291 EveLan Evergreen Land Services 01/24/2019 0.00 994.24170292 HenPro Henning Professional Services, Inc 01/24/2019 0.00 14,993.85170293 IDCAUT IDC Automatic LLC 01/24/2019 0.00 45.00170294 LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 01/24/2019 0.00 291.50170295 MNNAT MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 01/24/2019 0.00 14,954.85170296 NORASP NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 01/24/2019 0.00 126,457.01170297 SOUSUB Southwest Suburban Publishing 01/24/2019 0.00 428.80170298 TERBROS Terry Bros Inc 01/24/2019 0.00 7,379.43170299 AARP AARP 01/24/2019 0.00 190.00170300 ATKIJACK JACK ATKINS 01/24/2019 0.00 15.00170301 BCATRA BCA 01/24/2019 0.00 15.00170302 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/24/2019 0.00 382.00170303 GOLDMARI MARILYN GOLDSBY 01/24/2019 0.00 10.00170304 hach Hach Company 01/24/2019 0.00 1,386.10170305 HOOTHREA HOOPS AND THREADS LLC 01/24/2019 0.00 51.30170306 MEFIRE METRO CHIEF FIRE OFFICERS ASSN 01/24/2019 0.00 100.00170307 MINRUR MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 01/24/2019 0.00 250.00170308 MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 01/24/2019 0.00 390.00170309 MSFCA MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.01/24/2019 0.00 398.00170310 MORSAL MORTON SALT 01/24/2019 0.00 7,176.39170311 MunH2O Municipal H2O 01/24/2019 0.00 4,200.00170312 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 01/24/2019 0.00 22.60170313 STPSTA ST PAUL STAMP WORKS 01/24/2019 0.00 89.46170314 TRIEDEEA DeeAnn Triethart 01/24/2019 0.00 45.99170315 ZACKS ZACK'S INC.01/24/2019 0.00 1,538.01170316 CENHIL Centennial Hill Apartments 01/31/2019 0.00 207.45170317 LEAINS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 01/31/2019 VOID 8,684.20 0.00170318 SRCM SRCM, LLC 01/31/2019 0.00 872.50170319 AlbrStev Steven Albrecht 01/31/2019 0.00 15.00170320 UB*01601 KARA AMOROSI 01/31/2019 0.00 89.68170321 bcatra BCA 01/31/2019 0.00 15.00170322 bcatra BCA 01/31/2019 0.00 33.25170323 BerCof BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01/31/2019 0.00 799.21170324 BLAMAN Blackburn Manufacturing Company 01/31/2019 0.00 61.13170325 Borsta BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/31/2019 0.00 553.56170326 UB*01598 BURNET TITLE 01/31/2019 0.00 17.50170327 UB*01600 BURNET TITLE 01/31/2019 0.00 57.36170328 CAPPUB Capstone LLC 01/31/2019 0.00 350.00170329 UB*01597 CCA & T 01/31/2019 0.00 8.03170330 SHAKOP CITY OF SHAKOPEE 01/31/2019 0.00 2,100.00170331 CUTABO CUT ABOVE INC 01/31/2019 0.00 850.00170332 UB*01594 SYLVIA & DANIEL DE YOUNG 01/31/2019 0.00 85.20170333 UB*01592 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP 01/31/2019 0.00 91.22170334 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (2/1/2019 11:24 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount UB*01591 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 01/31/2019 0.00 15.55170335 FLUINT Fluid Interiors LLC 01/31/2019 0.00 611.24170336 GolLak Golf Lakes Condos 01/31/2019 0.00 750.00170337 UB*01603 GONYEA HOMES INC 01/31/2019 0.00 169.86170338 HENCHE HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEF'S ASSOC 01/31/2019 0.00 425.00170339 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/31/2019 0.00 1,466.67170340 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 01/31/2019 0.00 735.00170341 JHLAR JH LARSON COMPANY 01/31/2019 0.00 188.60170342 LAUPIA LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 01/31/2019 0.00 101.00170343 UB*01593 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/31/2019 0.00 94.73170344 UB*01596 MINNESOTA TITLE 01/31/2019 0.00 127.49170345 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/31/2019 0.00 64.00170346 MORSAL MORTON SALT 01/31/2019 0.00 2,256.48170347 NEOGOV NEOGOV 01/31/2019 0.00 6,444.00170348 POST POSTMASTER 01/31/2019 0.00 1,243.43170349 RobBeaIn Robert Bealke Industries 01/31/2019 0.00 800.00170350 UB*01590 TIMOTHY & ALISON RONGITSCH 01/31/2019 0.00 80.88170351 ROSCIT Rose City Canopy 01/31/2019 0.00 10.00170352 RuegJerr JERRY RUEGEMER 01/31/2019 0.00 600.00170353 SARLJODI Jodi Sarles 01/31/2019 0.00 200.00170354 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 01/31/2019 0.00 77.00170355 Signso SIGNSOURCE 01/31/2019 0.00 211.50170356 SILRUN Silent Run Adventures LLC 01/31/2019 0.00 400.00170357 SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 01/31/2019 0.00 4,156.00170358 GREPRO THE GREENWORLD PROJECT 01/31/2019 0.00 128.93170359 THEIKEN KENNETH A THIES 01/31/2019 0.00 650.00170360 TraAdv TRAVEL ADVISOR'S INTERNATIONAL 01/31/2019 0.00 250.00170361 TRUWES TruWest LLC 01/31/2019 0.00 1,500.00170362 UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 01/31/2019 0.00 11.42170363 UB*01599 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/31/2019 0.00 22.37170364 UB*01602 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/31/2019 0.00 57.49170365 UB*01595 TIM & JANE WHITE 01/31/2019 0.00 62.29170366 Report Total (79 checks): 217,021.36 8,684.20 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (2/1/2019 11:24 AM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 2/1/2019 11:35 AM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-ACMTOO Acme Tools 01/16/2019 0.00 787.99 ACH Z-ADOBE Adobe 01/16/2019 0.00 535.80 ACH Z-ALLFUS Allfuses.com 01/16/2019 0.00 160.00 ACH Z-ALLELE Allied Electronics Inc 01/16/2019 0.00 435.99 ACH Z-AMAZON Amazon 01/16/2019 0.00 3,768.58 ACH Z-BATPLU Batteries Plus 01/16/2019 0.00 209.72 ACH Z-BLOWAL Blocker & Wallace Service LLC 01/16/2019 0.00 262.60 ACH Z-BRAWOR Brady Worldwide Inc 01/16/2019 0.00 107.89 ACH Z-WINZIP CBI-WINZIP 01/16/2019 0.00 10.68 ACH Z-CEMSTO Cemstone 01/16/2019 0.00 45.99 ACH Z-CROAWA Crown Awards 01/16/2019 0.00 959.44 ACH Z-CUBFOO Cub Foods 01/16/2019 0.00 125.11 ACH Z-DAVANN Davanni's 01/16/2019 0.00 207.87 ACH Z-DISRUB Discountrubberstamps.com 01/16/2019 0.00 72.06 ACH Z-DOLTRE Dollar Tree Stores Inc 01/16/2019 0.00 59.13 ACH Z-EDDBAU Eddie Bauer 01/16/2019 0.00 124.99 ACH Z-FACBOO Facebook 01/16/2019 0.00 63.11 ACH Z-FASTEN Fastenal Company 01/16/2019 0.00 9.78 ACH Z-HACCOM Hach Company 01/16/2019 0.00 256.87 ACH Z-HAJCOR Hajoca Corporation 01/16/2019 0.00 138.29 ACH Z-HOMDEP Home Depot 01/16/2019 0.00 1,149.95 ACH Z-HOULIH Houlihan's 01/16/2019 0.00 318.93 ACH Z-HYVEE Hy-Vee 01/16/2019 0.00 4.99 ACH Z-IMPARK IMPARK 01/16/2019 0.00 30.00 ACH Z-INTCOD International Code Council 01/16/2019 0.00 665.85 ACH Z-INTPOW Interstate Powersystems 01/16/2019 0.00 46.68 ACH Z-IOBIT IObit Online Shop 01/16/2019 0.00 22.95 ACH Z-JOHFIT Johnson Fitness & Wellness 01/16/2019 0.00 46.49 ACH Z-LAMCOM Laminator.com 01/16/2019 0.00 114.48 ACH Z-LEEANN LEEANN CHIN 01/16/2019 0.00 178.81 ACH Z-LIVACT Live Action Safety 01/16/2019 0.00 173.37 ACH Z-LUNBYE Lunds & Byerly's 01/16/2019 0.00 58.17 ACH Z-LYNCAR Lynn Card Company 01/16/2019 0.00 37.41 ACH Z-MAKIT MakIt Products Inc 01/16/2019 0.00 96.00 ACH Z-MCMCAR McMaster-Carr 01/16/2019 0.00 173.53 ACH Z-MENARD Menards 01/16/2019 0.00 601.85 ACH Z-MERLIN Merlins Ace Hardware 01/16/2019 0.00 516.35 ACH Z-MILFLE Mills Fleet Farm 01/16/2019 0.00 190.92 ACH Z-MNSTA Minnesota State Colleges and Universities 01/16/2019 0.00 575.00 ACH Z-MNASSN MN Assn of Asphalt Pavement Tech 01/16/2019 0.00 155.00 ACH Z-NATREG National Registry Of EMT 01/16/2019 0.00 15.00 ACH Z-NORTOO Northern Tool+Equipment 01/16/2019 0.00 330.69 ACH Z-OFFMAX Office Max/Office Depot 01/16/2019 0.00 121.12 ACH Z-PARBAK Paragon Bakery 01/16/2019 0.00 16.50 ACH Z-PARCIT Party City 01/16/2019 0.00 90.32 ACH Z-PASTER Pasternack 01/16/2019 0.00 792.17 ACH Z-PIZZAI Pizzaioli 01/16/2019 0.00 124.88 ACH Z-PLUSTO Plumbersstock.com 01/16/2019 0.00 31.82 ACH Z-PROLAM Projector Lamps USA 01/16/2019 0.00 162.94 ACH Z-REDWIN Red Wing Store 01/16/2019 0.00 203.99 ACH Z-ROTCLU Rotary Club 01/16/2019 0.00 106.00 Page 1 of 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-SAMCLU Sam's Club 01/16/2019 0.00 210.75 ACH Z-SCHENT SCH ENTERPRISES LLC 01/16/2019 0.00 2,091.42 ACH Z-SOUMET Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 01/16/2019 0.00 240.00 ACH Z-TARGET Target 01/16/2019 0.00 713.35 ACH Z-TECPRO Tech Products Inc 01/16/2019 0.00 332.44 ACH Z-TESEQU Test Equipment Depot 01/16/2019 0.00 87.63 ACH Z-THEGAR The Garden By The Woods 01/16/2019 0.00 29.53 ACH Z-TONPIR TonerPirate.com 01/16/2019 0.00 198.12 ACH Z-UOFM U of M Contlearning 01/16/2019 0.00 565.00 ACH Z-VECSTO VectorStock 01/16/2019 0.00 50.00 ACH Z-VICHOU Victoria House 01/16/2019 0.00 13.73 ACH Z-VIKELE Viking Electric Supply 01/16/2019 0.00 40.62 ACH Z-WWGRAI WW Grainger 01/16/2019 0.00 227.73 ACH ABMEQU ABM Equipment & Supply, LLC 01/24/2019 0.00 546.50 ACH AdvEng Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 01/24/2019 0.00 2,487.25 ACH BROAWA BROADWAY AWARDS 01/24/2019 0.00 106.63 ACH carcou Carver County 01/24/2019 0.00 100.00 ACH carcou Carver County 01/24/2019 0.00 15,838.75 ACH CARSWC CARVER SWCD 01/24/2019 0.00 110.00 ACH DIASNO Diamond Snow & Ice Control 01/24/2019 0.00 2,800.00 ACH FergEnte Ferguson Waterworks #2516 01/24/2019 0.00 4,635.30 ACH STICGREG GREG STICHA 01/24/2019 0.00 560.54 ACH HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 01/24/2019 0.00 2,737.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/24/2019 0.00 198.96 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 01/24/2019 0.00 292.50 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergengy Group 01/24/2019 0.00 604,898.00 ACH MatTri Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 01/24/2019 0.00 101.64 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/24/2019 0.00 114.16 ACH SPRPCS SPRINT PCS 01/24/2019 0.00 103.44 ACH TCIInc TCIC, Inc. 01/24/2019 0.00 60.00 ACH UniFar United Farmers Cooperative 01/24/2019 0.00 2.90 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 01/24/2019 0.00 536.53 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/24/2019 0.00 1,160.50 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 0.00 11,682.30 ACH AdaPes ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 01/31/2019 0.00 125.00 ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 01/31/2019 0.00 39.78 ACH carcou Carver County 01/31/2019 0.00 46,304.06 ACH CivPlu CivicPlus 01/31/2019 0.00 716.63 ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/31/2019 0.00 134.58 ACH comint COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 01/31/2019 0.00 4,128.00 ACH DALCO DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 01/31/2019 0.00 58.22 ACH LARSDALE DALE LARSEN 01/31/2019 0.00 119.99 ACH EnvSer EnviroTech Services Inc. 01/31/2019 0.00 1,020.00 ACH AVESIS Fidelity Security Life 01/31/2019 0.00 194.50 ACH HeaStr Health Strategies 01/31/2019 0.00 525.00 ACH HOIKOE HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 01/31/2019 0.00 2,599.75 ACH IndPla Indelco Plastics Corporation 01/31/2019 0.00 94.03 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/31/2019 0.00 723.00 ACH JohSup JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 01/31/2019 0.00 528.88 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 01/31/2019 0.00 285.00 ACH KimHor KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 0.00 34,449.93 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/31/2019 0.00 183.94 ACH NusEqu Nuss Truck & Equipment 01/31/2019 0.00 70.67 ACH nyspub NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 01/31/2019 0.00 9,253.08 ACH OPG-3 OPG-3, Inc 01/31/2019 0.00 13,680.00 ACH ProTec Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 01/31/2019 0.00 8,000.00 ACH SafVeh Safety Vehicle Solutions 01/31/2019 0.00 130.00 ACH STRGUA STRATOGUARD LLC 01/31/2019 0.00 1,631.75 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 01/31/2019 0.00 29.40 ACH WitPub Witmer Public Safety Group, Inc. 01/31/2019 0.00 433.48 ACH wsb WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 0.00 27,871.79 Page 2 of 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 01/31/2019 0.00 5,244.85 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 0.00 22,289.02 Report Total:0.00 850,231.60 Page 3 of 3 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 02/01/2019 - 11:26 AM Name Check Da Account Description Amount AARP 01/24/2019 101-1560-4300 Driver Safety - 8 hr course 190.00 AARP 190.00 Albrecht Steven 01/31/2019 101-1539-3631 Refund - Tri City TB Tourney 15.00 Albrecht Steven 15.00 AMOROSI KARA 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 26.62 AMOROSI KARA 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 61.34 AMOROSI KARA 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.47 AMOROSI KARA 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.25 AMOROSI KARA 89.68 ATKINS JACK 01/24/2019 101-1220-4300 EMT National Registry Reimbursement 15.00 ATKINS JACK 15.00 BCA 01/24/2019 101-1120-4300 Background investigation 15.00 BCA 01/31/2019 101-1120-4300 background investigations 15.00 BCA 01/31/2019 101-1220-4300 background investigations-firefighter 33.25 BCA 63.25 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 Cartridge Filter 65.00 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 coffee 75.36 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 coffee 658.85 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 799.21 Blackburn Manufacturing Company 01/31/2019 701-0000-4150 Krylon Long Wand w/Flag Holder 61.13 Blackburn Manufacturing Company 61.13 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/24/2019 701-0000-4530 200W 115V Heater 382.00 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/31/2019 101-1370-4510 lamps 182.04 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/31/2019 101-1190-4510 lamps 285.12 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/31/2019 101-1190-4510 lamps 86.40 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 935.56 BURNET TITLE 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.28 BURNET TITLE 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.66 BURNET TITLE 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.73 BURNET TITLE 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.83 BURNET TITLE 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 49.39 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2019 - 11:26 AM)Page 1 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount BURNET TITLE 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.14 BURNET TITLE 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.41 BURNET TITLE 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.42 BURNET TITLE 74.86 CAP AGENCY 01/24/2019 101-1430-4300 4th quarter charges - Oct to Dec 2018 2,100.00 CAP AGENCY 2,100.00 Capstone LLC 01/31/2019 101-1220-4370 Instructor fee - Training/FIRE: Honor,Pride,Purpose 350.00 Capstone LLC 350.00 CCA & T 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.05 CCA & T 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.36 CCA & T 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.06 CCA & T 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.56 CCA & T 8.03 Centennial Hill Apartments 01/31/2019 101-1220-4290 Replacement of fire door for apartment #309 207.45 Centennial Hill Apartments 207.45 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 01/31/2019 101-1210-4300 2019 Drug Task Force membership dues 2,100.00 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 2,100.00 CUT ABOVE INC 01/31/2019 720-7202-4300 Pipewood city property clean-up 850.00 CUT ABOVE INC 850.00 David Weekley Homes 01/24/2019 101-1250-3816 Refund for SAC charged on permit# 2015-03320 24.85 David Weekley Homes 01/24/2019 701-0000-2023 Refund for SAC charged on permit# 2015-03320 2,460.15 David Weekley Homes 01/24/2019 701-0000-3811 Refund for SAC charged on permit# 2015-03320 75.00 David Weekley Homes 2,560.00 DE YOUNG SYLVIA & DANIEL 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 63.70 DE YOUNG SYLVIA & DANIEL 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 20.93 DE YOUNG SYLVIA & DANIEL 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.24 DE YOUNG SYLVIA & DANIEL 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.33 DE YOUNG SYLVIA & DANIEL 85.20 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01/24/2019 101-1220-4260 Screw Ext Drill Set, Socket set, Hex Die 335.36 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 335.36 Dultmeier Sales LLC 01/24/2019 101-1320-4120 misc parts/supplies 104.45 Dultmeier Sales LLC 104.45 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 30.11 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 49.52 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.85 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2019 - 11:26 AM)Page 2 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.74 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP 91.22 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.68 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.05 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.54 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.28 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 15.55 Evergreen Land Services 01/24/2019 605-6501-4300 Proj 14-08 Relocation Consultant - Dec 2018 994.24 Evergreen Land Services 994.24 Fluid Interiors LLC 01/31/2019 400-0000-4703 7 - Chair backs 611.24 Fluid Interiors LLC 611.24 GOLDSBY MARILYN 01/24/2019 101-1539-3631 Refund - Pickleball Lesson 10.00 GOLDSBY MARILYN 10.00 Golf Lakes Condos 01/31/2019 815-8201-2024 Landscape Escrow - 735 Crossroads Court 750.00 Golf Lakes Condos 750.00 GONYEA HOMES INC 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 64.33 GONYEA HOMES INC 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 90.82 GONYEA HOMES INC 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.50 GONYEA HOMES INC 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.21 GONYEA HOMES INC 169.86 Hach Company 01/24/2019 700-7019-4550 misc parts/supplies 1,386.10 Hach Company 1,386.10 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEF'S ASSOC 01/31/2019 101-1220-4370 Blue Card SIM Training - J Lafevere, January 2019 425.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEF'S ASSOC 425.00 Henning Professional Services, Inc 01/24/2019 605-6501-4300 Proj 14-08 TH 101 from CSAH 61 to CSAH 14 - svc through Dec 2018 14,993.85 Henning Professional Services, Inc 14,993.85 HOOPS AND THREADS LLC 01/24/2019 701-0000-4240 Utilities logo on left chest 8.55 HOOPS AND THREADS LLC 01/24/2019 700-0000-4240 Utilities logo on left chest 8.55 HOOPS AND THREADS LLC 01/24/2019 700-0000-4240 Utilities logo on left chest 17.10 HOOPS AND THREADS LLC 01/24/2019 701-0000-4240 Utilities logo on left chest 17.10 HOOPS AND THREADS LLC 51.30 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/31/2019 101-0000-2009 2/01/2019 ID #304303 1,135.41 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/31/2019 210-0000-2009 2/01/2019 ID #304303 25.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/31/2019 701-0000-2009 2/01/2019 ID #304303 151.58 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/31/2019 720-0000-2009 2/01/2019 ID #304303 1.25 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2019 - 11:26 AM)Page 3 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/31/2019 700-0000-2009 2/01/2019 ID #304303 153.43 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 1,466.67 IDC Automatic LLC 01/24/2019 101-1550-4300 Lake Ann Park Shed Fire Door 45.00 IDC Automatic LLC 45.00 IUOE Local #49 01/31/2019 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00401.02.2019 Local 49 dues 489.93 IUOE Local #49 01/31/2019 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00401.02.2019 Local 49 dues 181.27 IUOE Local #49 01/31/2019 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00401.02.2019 Local 49 dues 63.80 IUOE Local #49 735.00 JH LARSON COMPANY 01/31/2019 101-1190-4510 Lamps 188.60 JH LARSON COMPANY 188.60 LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 01/31/2019 101-1560-4300 piano tuning 101.00 LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 101.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 01/24/2019 400-0000-3808 refund quick attack fire truck overpayment claim CA 61285 291.50 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 291.50 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 29.00 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 51.61 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.94 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.18 LIBERTY TITLE INC 94.73 METRO CHIEF FIRE OFFICERS ASSN 01/24/2019 101-1220-4360 2019 Member Dues - Don Johnson 100.00 METRO CHIEF FIRE OFFICERS ASSN 100.00 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 01/24/2019 700-0000-4360 City Membership - Jan 2019 to Jan 2020 250.00 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 250.00 MINNESOTA TITLE 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 54.99 MINNESOTA TITLE 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.86 MINNESOTA TITLE 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.00 MINNESOTA TITLE 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 62.64 MINNESOTA TITLE 127.49 MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 01/24/2019 700-0000-4550 2018 water permit 14,954.85 MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 14,954.85 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/31/2019 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00401.02.2019 NCPERS-Life Insurance 44.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/31/2019 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00401.02.2019 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.66 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/31/2019 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00401.02.2019 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.55 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/31/2019 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00401.02.2019 NCPERS-Life Insurance 0.79 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2019 - 11:26 AM)Page 4 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 64.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 01/24/2019 701-0000-4370 2019 Conference Registration - T Monnens 390.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 390.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.01/24/2019 101-1220-4360 2019 Membership dues 398.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. 398.00 MORTON SALT 01/24/2019 101-1320-4150 Safe-T-Salt 7,176.39 MORTON SALT 01/31/2019 101-1320-4150 Safe-T-Salt 2,256.48 MORTON SALT 9,432.87 Municipal H2O 01/24/2019 700-7043-4300 Annual EPA RMP Compliance Service Fee for WWTP 4,200.00 Municipal H2O 4,200.00 NEOGOV 01/31/2019 210-0000-4300 Software License, Governmentjobs.com Subscription 6,444.00 NEOGOV 6,444.00 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 01/24/2019 601-6036-4751 2017 Street Rehab Proj Lake Susan Hills 126,457.01 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 126,457.01 POSTMASTER 01/31/2019 700-0000-4330 Utility statements 142.29 POSTMASTER 01/31/2019 701-0000-4330 Utility statements 142.29 POSTMASTER 01/31/2019 700-0000-4330 Utility statements 479.42 POSTMASTER 01/31/2019 701-0000-4330 Utility statements 479.43 POSTMASTER 1,243.43 Robert Bealke Industries 01/31/2019 101-1611-4300 DJ & AV/PA services-Feb Fest 800.00 Robert Bealke Industries 800.00 RONGITSCH TIMOTHY & ALISON 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 27.86 RONGITSCH TIMOTHY & ALISON 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 37.98 RONGITSCH TIMOTHY & ALISON 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.07 RONGITSCH TIMOTHY & ALISON 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.97 RONGITSCH TIMOTHY & ALISON 80.88 Rose City Canopy 01/31/2019 101-0000-2033 Overpaid on permit# 2019-00103 10.00 Rose City Canopy 10.00 RUEGEMER JERRY 01/31/2019 101-0000-1027 Feb Fest Ice Fishing Contest change 600.00 RUEGEMER JERRY 600.00 Sarles Jodi 01/31/2019 101-0000-1028 Petty Cash - Dance Showcase 200.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2019 - 11:26 AM)Page 5 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Sarles Jodi 200.00 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 01/24/2019 700-0000-4550 PS HD Filter 60M 10pk 22.60 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 01/31/2019 701-0000-4150 Flour Purple, Utility Knife 77.00 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 99.60 SIGNSOURCE 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 interior name plates 211.50 SIGNSOURCE 211.50 Silent Run Adventures LLC 01/31/2019 101-1611-4300 Dogsled Rides-Feb Fest 400.00 Silent Run Adventures LLC 400.00 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 01/31/2019 101-1160-4220 VMWare annual renewals 4,156.00 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 4,156.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 01/24/2019 601-6039-4340 printing/advertising 57.60 Southwest Suburban Publishing 01/24/2019 101-1110-4340 printing/advertising 371.20 Southwest Suburban Publishing 428.80 SRCM, LLC 01/31/2019 101-1250-3816 Refund for SAC charge on permit# 17-02802 24.85 SRCM, LLC 01/31/2019 701-0000-2023 Refund for SAC charge on permit# 17-02802 2,460.15 SRCM, LLC 01/31/2019 101-1310-3903 Refund for SAC charge on permit# 17-02802 -1,405.00 SRCM, LLC 01/31/2019 101-1320-3903 Refund for SAC charge on permit# 17-02802 -200.00 SRCM, LLC 01/31/2019 400-0000-1155 Refund for SAC charge on permit# 17-02802 -82.50 SRCM, LLC 01/31/2019 701-0000-3811 Refund for SAC charge on permit# 17-02802 75.00 SRCM, LLC 872.50 ST PAUL STAMP WORKS 01/24/2019 101-1170-4110 Self-Inking Die Plate Dater 89.46 ST PAUL STAMP WORKS 89.46 Terry Bros Inc 01/24/2019 410-0000-4710 Proj. Anthem Park Trail - 3" Wearing Course Mix for trails 7,379.43 Terry Bros Inc 7,379.43 THE GREENWORLD PROJECT 01/31/2019 720-7202-4130 Arbor Day seedlings - Bag and Tag Tree 128.93 THE GREENWORLD PROJECT 128.93 THIES KENNETH A 01/31/2019 101-1611-4300 horse drawn wagon ride-Feb Fest 650.00 THIES KENNETH A 650.00 TRAVEL ADVISOR'S INTERNATIONAL01/31/2019 101-1611-4300 Travel certificate-Feb Fest 250.00 TRAVEL ADVISOR'S INTERNATIONAL 250.00 Triethart DeeAnn 01/24/2019 101-1250-4130 Notary Public Stamp 25.99 Triethart DeeAnn 01/24/2019 101-1250-4360 Signature registered 20.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2019 - 11:26 AM)Page 6 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Triethart DeeAnn 45.99 TruWest LLC 01/31/2019 815-8201-2024 Landscape Escrow - 745 Crossroads Ct 750.00 TruWest LLC 01/31/2019 815-8201-2024 Landscape Escrow - 755 Crossroads Ct 750.00 TruWest LLC 1,500.00 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 01/31/2019 700-0000-4330 City to MN Pump Works-Dundas,MN 11.42 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 11.42 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.41 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.40 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.22 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.34 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 17.41 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 32.11 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/31/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.78 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.19 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 79.86 WHITE TIM & JANE 01/31/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.55 WHITE TIM & JANE 01/31/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 43.74 WHITE TIM & JANE 62.29 ZACK'S INC.01/24/2019 101-1320-4120 Misc parts/supplies 1,538.01 ZACK'S INC. 1,538.01 217,021.36 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2019 - 11:26 AM)Page 7 of 7 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM Name Check D Account Description Amount ABM Equipment & Supply, LLC 01/24/2019 701-0000-4120 BFX Door Seal - Contour Body 546.50 ABM Equipment & Supply, LLC 546.50 Acme Tools 01/16/2019 101-1320-4260 Wacker Neuson M2500 Internal Vibrator, SM2S Shaft 787.99 Acme Tools 787.99 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 01/31/2019 101-1170-4300 monthly service 125.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 125.00 Adobe 01/16/2019 101-1160-4220 Adobe Captivate Upgrade 535.80 Adobe 535.80 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 01/24/2019 701-0000-4300 2018 SCADA Services - 9/29/18 to 11/2/18 2,487.25 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 2,487.25 Al-Hilwani Juli 01/24/2019 101-1533-4300 Personal Training 292.50 Al-Hilwani Juli 01/31/2019 101-1533-4300 Personal Training 285.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 577.50 Allfuses.com 01/16/2019 700-7019-4150 JJS-250 Fuse 160.00 Allfuses.com 160.00 Allied Electronics Inc 01/16/2019 700-7019-4150 Oil Filters 435.99 Allied Electronics Inc 435.99 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1160-4530 Replacement phone case - Paul 20.01 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1310-4120 Flashlight Batteries for Steve F 21.38 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1370-4705 Dell 17" Laptop - Shop Car Scanning tool 929.00 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1160-4530 Replacement Keyboard Nann + Spares 156.53 Amazon 01/16/2019 400-4126-4703 Ipad car chargers - Parks / Cable adapters 92.92 Amazon 01/16/2019 400-4126-4703 Apple TV/Remote - Eng Conf Room/Rep PW 185.98 Amazon 01/16/2019 400-4126-4703 Dell 24in monitor 439.88 Amazon 01/16/2019 400-4126-4703 Cell Phone Gimbal for video recording 115.00 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1320-4240 Long Sleeve shirt 74.97 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1170-4110 Large copy paper for GIS printing 84.18 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1310-4120 Flashlight Batteries - Engineering 21.38 Amazon 01/16/2019 400-4126-4530 Security Camera 1,099.00 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1170-4110 Voicemail Log Books 9.42 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1260-4120 CSO Supplies - Trash Bags 25.77 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 1 of 11 Name Check D Account Description Amount Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1170-4110 Plates - Meal/Meeting supplies 59.99 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1220-4290 Coffee Urn 60 Cup 106.01 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1806-4130 Superhero Masks 21.46 Amazon 01/16/2019 701-0000-4240 Long Sleeve Shirt 17.50 Amazon 01/16/2019 700-0000-4240 Long Sleeve Shirt 17.49 Amazon 01/16/2019 700-0000-4310 Holster Belt Clip 12.46 Amazon 01/16/2019 701-0000-4310 Holster Belt Clip 12.46 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1370-4260 Drill Driver, Screwdriver 95.22 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1370-4260 Compact Battery Packs 65.49 Amazon 01/16/2019 101-1320-4120 Refund for foreign currancy on Deep Groove Bearings -4.30 Amazon 01/16/2019 400-4126-4703 Tripod stand for Gimbal 7.90 Amazon 01/16/2019 400-4126-4703 TV Mount Bracket - Deputies Camera TV 14.99 Amazon 01/16/2019 400-4126-4703 Ergonomic keyboard - Kim M Fountain Conf 66.49 Amazon 3,768.58 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus01/31/2019 101-0000-2008 January 2019 premium 39.78 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 Batteries Plus 01/16/2019 101-1160-4530 SLAA 12-5F2 12V Batteries 135.92 Batteries Plus 01/16/2019 700-0000-4150 6V HVY DTY Lantern, 6V Alkaline Batteries 73.80 Batteries Plus 209.72 Blocker & Wallace Service LLC 01/16/2019 700-7043-4120 Grease Lubricant for Truck Blowers, Oil 262.60 Blocker & Wallace Service LLC 262.60 Brady Worldwide Inc 01/16/2019 701-0000-4150 High Performance Polyester Sign 107.89 Brady Worldwide Inc 107.89 BROADWAY AWARDS 01/24/2019 101-1110-4375 Walnut Plaque - Denny Laufenburger's Maple Leaf Award 106.63 BROADWAY AWARDS 106.63 Carver County 01/24/2019 101-1210-4300 4th Quarter 2018 Police Contract - 10/1/18-12/23/18 15,838.75 Carver County 01/24/2019 101-1210-4300 Liquor License Bkgrd Investigation - Kwik Trip - renewal 100.00 Carver County 01/31/2019 720-7205-4300 AIS Watercraft Inspections 46,304.06 Carver County 62,242.81 CARVER SWCD 01/24/2019 400-0000-1155 11/28/18 CSEC Monitoring/Inspection Panera Bread 110.00 CARVER SWCD 110.00 CBI-WINZIP 01/16/2019 101-1160-4220 Winzip Subscription Renewal 10.68 CBI-WINZIP 10.68 Cemstone 01/16/2019 700-0000-4240 Safety Lime Bomber Jacket 23.00 Cemstone 01/16/2019 701-0000-4240 Safety Lime Bomber Jacket 22.99 Cemstone 45.99 CivicPlus 01/31/2019 210-0000-4300 Parks & Rec Website Annual Fee for Hosting and Support 716.63 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 2 of 11 Name Check D Account Description Amount CivicPlus 716.63 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/31/2019 101-0000-2008 January 2019 premium 60.72 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/31/2019 700-0000-2008 January 2019 premium 36.93 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/31/2019 701-0000-2008 January 2019 premium 36.93 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 134.58 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.01/31/2019 101-1160-4220 Sonicwall Firewall annual support renewal 1,930.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.01/31/2019 101-1160-4220 Dell PS6100 annual support renewal 2,198.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 4,128.00 Crown Awards 01/16/2019 101-1806-4130 Medals 623.00 Crown Awards 01/16/2019 101-1807-4130 Medals 336.44 Crown Awards 959.44 Cub Foods 01/16/2019 101-1220-4290 Coffee, Forks, Cake, Milk - Truck 1 Ceremony 74.17 Cub Foods 01/16/2019 101-1538-4130 Holiday Gift Making - Apple juice, Donuts 8.75 Cub Foods 01/16/2019 700-7019-4150 Paper towels, Water 42.19 Cub Foods 125.11 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.01/31/2019 101-1170-4510 Rug Runner for Public Safety Entrance 58.22 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 58.22 Davanni's 01/16/2019 101-1110-4370 City Council meals 119.46 Davanni's 01/16/2019 720-7201-4130 Pizza - Comm. meeting 88.41 Davanni's 207.87 Diamond Snow & Ice Control 01/24/2019 101-1320-4150 Ice B-Gone Liquid De-icer 2,800.00 Diamond Snow & Ice Control 2,800.00 Discountrubberstamps.com 01/16/2019 101-1250-4130 Self-Inking Stamp 72.06 Discountrubberstamps.com 72.06 Dollar Tree Stores Inc 01/16/2019 101-1560-4130 Tablecovers 26.88 Dollar Tree Stores Inc 01/16/2019 101-1560-4130 Tablecovers, Tablerunners 19.35 Dollar Tree Stores Inc 01/16/2019 101-1560-4130 Hand Soap 12.90 Dollar Tree Stores Inc 59.13 Eddie Bauer 01/16/2019 700-0000-4240 Sweatshirts, Tees 100.00 Eddie Bauer 01/16/2019 700-0000-4240 Flannel shirt 24.99 Eddie Bauer 124.99 EnviroTech Services Inc.01/31/2019 101-1320-4150 Calcium Chloride 1,020.00 EnviroTech Services Inc. 1,020.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 3 of 11 Name Check D Account Description Amount Facebook 01/16/2019 101-1530-4375 FB Ads - Engagement, Holiday Boutique 63.11 Facebook 63.11 Fastenal Company 01/16/2019 701-0000-4551 Stainless Steel Threaded Rod 9.78 Fastenal Company 9.78 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 01/24/2019 700-0000-4550 HHBXL HYD BUDDY XL 4,095.00 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 01/24/2019 700-0000-4150 Bracket A-FRM for SRL50 GALV RTRVL 42.35 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 01/24/2019 700-0000-4250 LF 4 MTR FLG KIT BRZ SET 497.95 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 4,635.30 Fidelity Security Life 01/31/2019 101-0000-2007 Vision insurance - February 2019 161.92 Fidelity Security Life 01/31/2019 700-0000-2007 Vision insurance - February 2019 18.14 Fidelity Security Life 01/31/2019 701-0000-2007 Vision insurance - February 2019 11.99 Fidelity Security Life 01/31/2019 720-0000-2007 Vision insurance - February 2019 2.45 Fidelity Security Life 194.50 Hach Company 01/16/2019 700-7043-4550 Chemkey Reagents, Fluoride Reagent Solution 256.87 Hach Company 256.87 Hajoca Corporation 01/16/2019 700-0000-4550 PROPRESS COP CPLG, COP TEE LEAD FREE, COPPER TUBE 138.29 Hajoca Corporation 138.29 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 01/24/2019 601-6036-4300 Lake Susan Hills Proj 17-01 - 2017 Street Rehab 2,737.00 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 2,737.00 Health Strategies 01/31/2019 101-1220-4300 recruit physical ability test 525.00 Health Strategies 525.00 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 01/31/2019 410-0000-4300 Proj 018-072, Chanhassen Lake Ann Park Expansion Feasibility 2,599.75 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 2,599.75 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4150 Sealant, Paint 40.96 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4150 Work Gloves, Conduit 56.77 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4150 Conduit, Blank Cover, Connectors, Outlet 39.86 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4150 Connectors -12.05 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4150 Connectors, Conduit 22.24 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4260 Shockwave Bit Set 39.97 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4120 Paint, Liners, Anchors w/Screws, Adhesive Clips 58.49 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4150 Calcium,Lime & Rust remover, Salt 89.62 Home Depot 01/16/2019 101-1550-4260 Bit set, Imp Driver kit, R-Charger 446.65 Home Depot 01/16/2019 101-1550-4120 27 Gallon totes 57.89 Home Depot 01/16/2019 101-1550-4120 Christmas lights 48.28 Home Depot 01/16/2019 101-1550-4120 CO/Smoke detector, Drain grate, Poly sheeting 83.71 Home Depot 01/16/2019 101-1560-4130 Poinsettias 80.11 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4150 Flashlight 18.22 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4150 Anchors w/Screws 7.49 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 4 of 11 Name Check D Account Description Amount Home Depot 01/16/2019 101-1220-4140 PEAK 2.5 Gal Diesel Exhaust Fluid 12.85 Home Depot 01/16/2019 700-7043-4550 Screws, Clamps, Coupling, Vinyl Tube 58.89 Home Depot 1,149.95 Houlihan's 01/16/2019 101-1520-4370 Meeting/Food 106.93 Houlihan's 01/16/2019 101-1110-4370 City Council Meal - Stuffed Chicken Take Out 212.00 Houlihan's 318.93 Hy-Vee 01/16/2019 101-1120-4370 APMP Board Meeting - Cinn Rolls 4.99 Hy-Vee 4.99 IMPARK 01/16/2019 101-1160-4370 Dec 4th Parking 10.00 IMPARK 01/16/2019 101-1160-4370 Dec 5th Parking 10.00 IMPARK 01/16/2019 101-1160-4370 Dec 6th Parking 10.00 IMPARK 30.00 Indelco Plastics Corporation 01/31/2019 700-7019-4530 misc parts/supplies 94.03 Indelco Plastics Corporation 94.03 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/24/2019 101-1170-4110 Paper, Tabs 198.96 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 Stapler, Tape, Rubberbands, Binders, Planner 79.13 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 Paper 197.94 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 Markers, Tape, Labels, Binding, 2 hole punches 131.52 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 Creamers 36.98 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 Tape, Paper, Post-Its, Plates, Spoons, Cups, Knives 223.11 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 punch/sanitizer 43.95 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 calendar 19.85 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/31/2019 101-1170-4110 return punch -9.48 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 921.96 International Code Council 01/16/2019 101-1250-4360 Single Certificate Renewal 85.00 International Code Council 01/16/2019 101-1250-4210 Code book, Handbook, Tabs, PocketBook/materials 290.85 International Code Council 01/16/2019 101-1220-4370 Training - D Nutter 290.00 International Code Council 665.85 Interstate Powersystems 01/16/2019 101-1220-4140 Plate - Retarder Separator 46.68 Interstate Powersystems 46.68 IObit Online Shop 01/16/2019 400-4126-4703 Driver Booster 3 pack 22.95 IObit Online Shop 22.95 Johnson Fitness & Wellness 01/16/2019 101-1530-4120 Weights 46.49 Johnson Fitness & Wellness 46.49 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 01/31/2019 101-1190-4530 185332LF Bearing Assy - Pump Leaking Water 429.80 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 01/31/2019 101-1170-4510 motor 99.08 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 5 of 11 Name Check D Account Description Amount JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 528.88 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 605-6501-4752 TH 101 Reconstruction 34,449.93 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 34,449.93 Laminator.com 01/16/2019 101-1170-4110 Laminating pouches 114.48 Laminator.com 114.48 LARSEN DALE 01/31/2019 101-1320-4240 clothing reimbursement - Biberalls for safety 119.99 LARSEN DALE 119.99 LEEANN CHIN 01/16/2019 101-1110-4370 City Council meals 178.81 LEEANN CHIN 178.81 Live Action Safety 01/16/2019 101-1220-4260 Skin Litter Basket Stretcher Bridle Sling 173.37 Live Action Safety 173.37 Lunds & Byerly's 01/16/2019 101-1617-4130 Cookies 16.97 Lunds & Byerly's 01/16/2019 720-7201-4130 Water, Ginger Ale, Cookies 22.74 Lunds & Byerly's 01/16/2019 101-1560-4130 Cookies 13.47 Lunds & Byerly's 01/16/2019 101-1110-4370 City Council meal - Brownies 4.99 Lunds & Byerly's 58.17 Lynn Card Company 01/16/2019 101-1220-4290 50 - Firefighter's Birthday cards 37.41 Lynn Card Company 37.41 Macqueen Emergengy Group 01/24/2019 422-0000-4704 Pierce Velocity Pumper 604,898.00 Macqueen Emergengy Group 604,898.00 MakIt Products Inc 01/16/2019 101-1538-4130 Gift Making - Plates 96.00 MakIt Products Inc 96.00 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.01/24/2019 101-1370-4170 Pro 33 Net 31# Alum 101.64 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 101.64 McMaster-Carr 01/16/2019 700-7043-4150 PVC Pipe Nipple 7.26 McMaster-Carr 01/16/2019 700-7043-4150 Pipe Fittings 29.31 McMaster-Carr 01/16/2019 700-7043-4550 On/Off Valve 136.96 McMaster-Carr 173.53 Menards 01/16/2019 101-1550-4120 Pine Garland 338.43 Menards 01/16/2019 101-1550-4120 Christmas Lights 241.99 Menards 01/16/2019 700-7043-4150 PVC Couplings, Pipes 21.43 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 6 of 11 Name Check D Account Description Amount Menards 601.85 Merlins Ace Hardware 01/16/2019 101-1250-4260 Rule Tapes, Snowbrushes, Tape Measures 74.02 Merlins Ace Hardware 01/16/2019 101-1220-4260 Chain Saw, MotoMix 1/2 Gallon 442.33 Merlins Ace Hardware 516.35 Mills Fleet Farm 01/16/2019 701-0000-4240 T-shirt 8.50 Mills Fleet Farm 01/16/2019 700-0000-4240 T-shirt 8.49 Mills Fleet Farm 01/16/2019 700-0000-4240 Safety Boots 49.99 Mills Fleet Farm 01/16/2019 701-0000-4240 Safety Boots 49.99 Mills Fleet Farm 01/16/2019 701-0000-4240 Tees, Jeans 36.98 Mills Fleet Farm 01/16/2019 700-0000-4240 Tees, Jeans 36.97 Mills Fleet Farm 190.92 Minnesota State Colleges and Universities 01/16/2019 101-1310-4370 Concrete Field 2 class - S Ferraro 575.00 Minnesota State Colleges and Universities 575.00 MN Assn of Asphalt Pavement Tech 01/16/2019 101-1310-4370 Training - S Ferraro 155.00 MN Assn of Asphalt Pavement Tech 155.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/24/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 114.16 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/31/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 139.66 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/31/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 44.28 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 298.10 National Registry Of EMT 01/16/2019 101-1220-4300 EMT renewal fee 15.00 National Registry Of EMT 15.00 Northern Tool+Equipment 01/16/2019 101-1320-4260 Steel Rod Cutter 330.69 Northern Tool+Equipment 330.69 Nuss Truck & Equipment 01/31/2019 101-1320-4140 Misc parts/Supplies 70.67 Nuss Truck & Equipment 70.67 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 01/31/2019 101-1110-4340 spring connection 7,349.84 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 01/31/2019 101-1120-4330 spring connection-postage 1,903.24 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 9,253.08 Office Max/Office Depot 01/16/2019 101-1160-4530 Replacement Keyboard,Mouse - Server Room 32.05 Office Max/Office Depot 01/16/2019 400-4126-4703 USB C Cable, Canned Air 53.42 Office Max/Office Depot 01/16/2019 700-7043-4150 Battery, Clipboard, Legal Pad 35.65 Office Max/Office Depot 121.12 OPG-3, Inc 01/31/2019 400-4117-4703 Laserfiche annual license support renew 13,680.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 7 of 11 Name Check D Account Description Amount OPG-3, Inc 13,680.00 Paragon Bakery 01/16/2019 101-1110-4370 City Council Meal - Cookies 16.50 Paragon Bakery 16.50 Party City 01/16/2019 101-1615-4130 Plastic Tablecloth 20.84 Party City 01/16/2019 101-1560-4130 Cups, Plates 45.88 Party City 01/16/2019 101-1560-4130 Plates 23.60 Party City 90.32 Pasternack 01/16/2019 701-0000-4530 10 dB Fixed Attenuator 792.17 Pasternack 792.17 Pizzaioli 01/16/2019 101-1538-4130 Holiday Gift Making - pizza 69.23 Pizzaioli 01/16/2019 101-1530-4130 Staff Meeting - pizza 55.65 Pizzaioli 124.88 Plumbersstock.com 01/16/2019 700-7043-4550 Hose Bib Sampling Valve 14.62 Plumbersstock.com 01/16/2019 700-7043-4150 Blue Teflon Tape 17.20 Plumbersstock.com 31.82 Projector Lamps USA 01/16/2019 101-1160-4530 Replacement Lamp - Public Works Projector 162.94 Projector Lamps USA 162.94 Pro-Tec Design, Inc.01/31/2019 700-7050-4705 Labor - WWTP 8,000.00 Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 8,000.00 Red Wing Store 01/16/2019 101-1320-4240 Boots 203.99 Red Wing Store 203.99 Rotary Club 01/16/2019 101-1120-4360 Monthly Fee - T Gerhardt 53.00 Rotary Club 01/16/2019 101-1520-4360 Monthly Fee - T Hoffman 53.00 Rotary Club 106.00 Safety Vehicle Solutions 01/31/2019 101-1220-4140 Install Heater in Chiefs Tahoe 130.00 Safety Vehicle Solutions 130.00 Sam's Club 01/16/2019 101-1560-4130 Food 105.69 Sam's Club 01/16/2019 101-1560-4130 Food, Napkins, Cups 93.10 Sam's Club 01/16/2019 101-1560-4130 Food 11.96 Sam's Club 210.75 SCH ENTERPRISES LLC 01/16/2019 410-0000-4705 Eclipse series Umbrella 2,091.42 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 8 of 11 Name Check D Account Description Amount SCH ENTERPRISES LLC 2,091.42 Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 01/16/2019 101-1110-4370 Chamber Meeting - McDonald, Campion, Ryan 90.00 Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 01/16/2019 101-1520-4370 Chamber Meeting - Hoffman 30.00 Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 01/16/2019 101-1210-4370 Chamber Meeting - Kittleson 30.00 Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 01/16/2019 101-1120-4370 Chamber Meeting - Petersen, Gerhardt, Meuwissen 90.00 Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 240.00 SPRINT PCS 01/24/2019 700-0000-4310 monthly charges 51.72 SPRINT PCS 01/24/2019 701-0000-4310 monthly charges 51.72 SPRINT PCS 103.44 STICHA GREG 01/24/2019 101-1130-4370 2019 mileage changed to .58/mile - adjustment 1.51 STICHA GREG 01/24/2019 101-1130-4370 LA Airfare to Conf in May 2019, SRA meeting lunch and mileage 559.03 STICHA GREG 560.54 STRATOGUARD LLC 01/31/2019 101-1160-4300 Proofpoint email filtering service-January 160.00 STRATOGUARD LLC 01/31/2019 101-1160-4220 Ivanti Protect Annual Renewal 1,471.75 STRATOGUARD LLC 1,631.75 Target 01/16/2019 101-1550-4120 Christmas Lights 117.99 Target 01/16/2019 101-1550-4120 Christmas Lights 120.26 Target 01/16/2019 101-1615-4130 Wondershop/Grocery 18.17 Target 01/16/2019 101-1617-4130 Band-Aids, Food storage 90.60 Target 01/16/2019 101-1530-4120 Lobby TV 268.43 Target 01/16/2019 101-1530-4120 Weights 60.97 Target 01/16/2019 101-1530-4130 Lobby Coffee, Pencils - Staff Meeting 22.49 Target 01/16/2019 101-1220-4375 Candy Canes 14.44 Target 713.35 TCIC, Inc.01/24/2019 701-0000-4530 Adapters 60.00 TCIC, Inc. 60.00 Tech Products Inc 01/16/2019 700-7043-4510 Everlast Sign 332.44 Tech Products Inc 332.44 Test Equipment Depot 01/16/2019 700-0000-4530 Removal Pump w/Detection Unit 87.63 Test Equipment Depot 87.63 The Garden By The Woods 01/16/2019 720-7202-4300 City Hall planters 29.53 The Garden By The Woods 29.53 TonerPirate.com 01/16/2019 700-0000-4120 Brother Black on White Tape 81.91 TonerPirate.com 01/16/2019 700-0000-4120 Brother Black on White P-Touch Tape 170.30 TonerPirate.com 01/16/2019 700-0000-4120 Refund for wrong tapes ordered -54.09 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 9 of 11 Name Check D Account Description Amount TonerPirate.com 198.12 U of M Contlearning 01/16/2019 101-1310-4370 68th Annual Concrete Conference - S Ferraro 175.00 U of M Contlearning 01/16/2019 101-1310-4370 Conference+CEAM Annual Membership, Lunch - P Oehme 390.00 U of M Contlearning 565.00 United Farmers Cooperative 01/24/2019 101-1550-4120 Fuel Inlet 2.90 United Farmers Cooperative 2.90 UNITED WAY 01/31/2019 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00401.02.2019 United Way 29.40 UNITED WAY 29.40 USA BLUE BOOK 01/24/2019 700-0000-4550 Hydrant Gate Valve w/speed handle 536.53 USA BLUE BOOK 536.53 VectorStock 01/16/2019 101-1170-4110 100 Images 50.00 VectorStock 50.00 Victoria House 01/16/2019 101-1120-4370 Carver County Managers Meeting 13.73 Victoria House 13.73 Viking Electric Supply 01/16/2019 701-0000-4551 PVC Pipes, Rod Clamp, Copper Grnd Rod 40.62 Viking Electric Supply 40.62 Witmer Public Safety Group, Inc.01/31/2019 400-4105-4705 Men's Supreme 14" Structural Fire Boot Pull-On 433.48 Witmer Public Safety Group, Inc. 433.48 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/24/2019 720-0000-4300 Teaton Lane Pond Survey - svc through May 2018 1,160.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 420-0000-4300 2018 Pavement Management 7,994.54 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 601-6038-4752 Orchard Lane area street & utility reconstruct 7,505.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 601-6039-4752 Lake Drive East Street Imp 18-02 6,550.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 720-7025-4751 Ithilian Pond Maintenance Project 1,069.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 720-0000-4300 Galpin Development Stormwater Review 2,652.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 605-6501-4300 Highway 101 Wetland Permitting 432.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 601-6033-4300 Park Road Mill and Overlay 182.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 700-0000-4300 2018 Water Distribution System Modeling 1,207.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/31/2019 720-0000-4300 2018 Misc Ponds 278.25 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 29,032.29 WW Grainger 01/16/2019 700-7043-4150 LENSCLNGTISSUE, ELBOWS 39.23 WW Grainger 01/16/2019 700-7043-4550 Connectors, Elbows, Reducer Bushing, Coupling 62.70 WW Grainger 01/16/2019 700-7043-4550 Connectors 56.40 WW Grainger 01/16/2019 700-7043-4150 Faceshield, Goggles 37.34 WW Grainger 01/16/2019 700-7043-4150 Coiled Grounding Clamps 32.06 WW Grainger 227.73 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 10 of 11 Name Check D Account Description Amount WW GRAINGER INC 01/31/2019 101-1190-4510 Dispensers for bathrooms 56.76 WW GRAINGER INC 01/31/2019 700-0000-4530 Personnel Lift 5,188.09 WW GRAINGER INC 5,244.85 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 251.06 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 700-7043-4320 electricity charges 4,307.79 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 11.31 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 94.05 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 71.28 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 22.98 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 11.31 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 43.22 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 35.28 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 6,821.86 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/24/2019 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 12.16 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 101-1190-4320 electricity charges 2,163.87 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 101-1550-4320 electricity charges 357.02 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 101-1170-4320 electricity charges 1,688.36 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 458.81 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 173.73 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 6,081.57 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 2,935.45 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 700-7019-4320 electricity charges 3,994.63 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 101-1540-4320 electricity charges 512.71 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 101-1220-4320 electricity charges 1,063.48 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 101-1370-4320 electricity charges 2,204.25 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 101-1120-4320 electricity charges 104.08 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 275.53 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/31/2019 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 275.53 XCEL ENERGY INC 33,971.32 850,231.60 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2019 - 11:45 AM)Page 11 of 11 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject Building Permit Data as of 02052019 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: I.2. Prepared By Robert Generous, Senior Planner File No: ATTACHMENTS: Building Permit Data 02052019 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 11, 2019 Subject January 2019 Website Analytics Overview Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: I.3. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ATTACHMENTS: January 2019 Website Analytics Overview Analytics City of Chanhassen All Web Site Data Go to report  Top Channels Users Conversions Acquisition Behavior Set up a goal. To see outcome metrics, define one or more goals. GET STARTED Conversions Acquisition Overview Jan 1, 2019 -Jan 31, 2019 Primary Dimension:Conversion: Edit Channel Grouping To see all 5 Channels click here. Top Channels All Goals Organic Search Direct Social Referral (Other)26.2% 64.9% Users Goal Conversion Rate January 7, 2019 January 21, 2019 500500500 1,0001,0001,000 January 7, 2019 January 21, 2019 0.00%0.00%0.00% 100.00%100.00%100.00% 1 Organic Search 2 Direct 3 Social 4 Referral 5 (Other) Users 12,793 New Users 10,851 Sessions 18,539 8,614 3,471 819 354 6 Bounce Rate 60.37% Pages / Session 2.22 Avg. Session Duration 00:02:15 56.52% 67.96% 72.89% 50.83% 55.56% © 2019 Google All Users 100.00% Users Analytics City of Chanhassen All Web Site Data Go to report  Page Rows 1 - 10 of 2489 Pages Jan 1, 2019 -Jan 31, 2019 Explorer Pageviews Unique Pageviews Avg. Time on Page Entrances Bounce Rate % Exit Page Value 41,242 % of Total:100.00% (41,242) 32,866 % of Total:100.00% (32,866) 00:01:50 Avg for View:00:01:50 (0.00%) 18,539 % of Total:100.00% (18,539) 60.37% Avg for View:60.37% (0.00%) 44.95% Avg for View:44.95% (0.00%) $0.00 % of Total:0.00% ($0.00) 1.6,436 (15.61%) 4,007 (12.19%)00:02:36 3,673 (19.81%)34.28%28.15%$0.00 (0.00%) 2.1,782 (4.32%) 1,491 (4.54%)00:00:55 1,347 (7.27%)29.10%31.14%$0.00 (0.00%) 3.1,631 (3.95%) 1,130 (3.44%)00:02:36 930 (5.02%)63.12%52.18%$0.00 (0.00%) 4.1,354 (3.28%) 1,239 (3.77%)00:02:31 736 (3.97%)87.36%78.58%$0.00 (0.00%) 5.1,317 (3.19%) 1,068 (3.25%)00:04:36 520 (2.80%)80.96%66.29%$0.00 (0.00%) 6.1,308 (3.17%) 1,159 (3.53%)00:02:21 771 (4.16%)85.34%76.22%$0.00 (0.00%) 7.1,090 (2.64%) 980 (2.98%)00:03:59 859 (4.63%)87.08%84.31%$0.00 (0.00%) 8.1,089 (2.64%) 879 (2.67%)00:03:54 667 (3.60%)84.11%68.23%$0.00 (0.00%) 9.737 (1.79%) 476 (1.45%)00:00:39 178 (0.96%)24.16%14.65%$0.00 (0.00%) 10.731 (1.77%) 584 (1.78%)00:00:59 201 (1.08%)40.30%28.32%$0.00 (0.00%) Pageviews January 2, 2…January 6, 2019 January 10, 2019 January 14, 2019 January 18, 2019 January 22, 2019 January 26, 2019 January 30, 2019 1,0001,0001,000 2,0002,0002,000 3,0003,0003,000 / /296/Recreation-Center /270/February-Festival /301/Gym-Schedule /240/Agendas-Minutes-Videos /1018/Job-Opportunities /289/Ice-Skating-Rinks /888/Medallion-Hunt /194/Proposed-Developments /31/Parks-Recreation © 2019 Google All Users 100.00% Pageviews Analytics City of Chanhassen All Web Site Data Go to report  Search Term Rows 1 - 10 of 929 Search Terms Jan 1, 2019 -Jan 31, 2019 Explorer Site Usage Total Unique Searches Results Pageviews / Search % Search Exits % Search Refinements Time after Search Avg. Search Depth 1,217 % of Total:100.00% (1,217) 1.23 Avg for View:1.23 (0.00%) 32.37% Avg for View:32.37% (0.00%) 17.91% Avg for View:17.91% (0.00%) 00:02:49 Avg for View:00:02:49 (0.00%) 1.67 Avg for View:1.67 (0.00%) 1.Pickleball 18 (1.48%)1.11 33.33%25.00%00:00:52 0.78 2.Dance 10 (0.82%)1.20 50.00%16.67%00:02:04 0.90 3.Open Indoor Pickleball 7 (0.58%)1.00 57.14%0.00%00:04:17 1.71 4.rink attendant 2018 7 (0.58%)1.00 100.00%0.00%00:00:00 0.00 5.Tot time 7 (0.58%)1.00 57.14%0.00%00:00:39 0.71 6.avienda 6 (0.49%)1.50 16.67%33.33%00:05:31 2.00 7.city code 5 (0.41%)1.00 0.00%20.00%00:04:08 1.60 8.Feb fest 5 (0.41%)1.40 80.00%0.00%00:00:57 0.20 9.fee schedule 5 (0.41%)1.80 0.00%33.33%00:02:29 4.00 10.Ice rink 5 (0.41%)1.00 20.00%0.00%00:00:38 0.80 Total Unique Searches January 2, 2…January 6, 2019 January 10, 2019 January 14, 2019 January 18, 2019 January 22, 2019 January 26, 2019 January 30, 2019 505050 100100100 © 2019 Google All Users 100.00% Total Unique Searches AnalyticsCity of Chanhassen All Web Site Data Go to report  Rows 1 - 3 of 3 Overview Jan 1, 2019 -Jan 31, 2019 Explorer Summary 12,793 % of Total: 100.00% (12,793) 12,793 % of Total: 100.00% (12,793) 1.desktop6,59851.22% 2.mobile5,47542.50% 3.tablet8086.27% Users January 2, 2…January 6, 2019January 10, 2019January 14, 2019January 18, 2019 January 22, 2019 January 26, 2019 January 30, 2019 500500500 1,0001,0001,000 Device CategoryUsersUsers Contribution to total: Users 6.3% 42.5%51.2% © 2019 Google All Users 100.00% Users Analytics City of Chanhassen All Web Site Data Go to report  Rows 1 - 3 of 3 Overview Jan 1, 2019 -Jan 31, 2019 Explorer Summary 12,793% of Total: 100.00% (12,793)12,793% of Total: 100.00% (12,793) 1.desktop 6,598 51.22% 2.mobile 5,475 42.50% 3.tablet 808 6.27% Users January 2, 2…January 6, 2019 January 10, 2019 January 14, 2019 January 18, 2019 January 22, 2019 January 26, 2019 January 30, 2019 500500500 1,0001,0001,000 Device Category Users Users Contribution to total: Users 6.3% 42.5%51.2% © 2019 Google All Users 100.00% Users JANUARY 2019 WEBSITE ANALYTICS OVERVIEW Analytics City of ChanhassenAll Web Site Data Go to report  Language Users % Users 1.en-us 12,628 98.33% 2.en-gb 55 0.43% 3.c 26 0.20% 4.zh-cn 11 0.09% 5.en-ca 10 0.08% 6.ko 10 0.08% 7.en 8 0.06% 8.en-au 8 0.06% 9.ru-ru 8 0.06% 10.de-de 7 0.05% Audience Overview Jan 1, 2019 -Jan 31, 2019 Overview Sessions Pageviews January 2, 2…January 6, 2019 January 10, 2019 January 14, 2019 January 18, 2019 January 22, 2019 January 26, 2019 January 30, 2019 500500500 1,0001,0001,000 1,5001,5001,500 1,0001,0001,000 2,0002,0002,000 3,0003,0003,000 Users 12,793 New Users 10,851 Sessions 18,539 Number of Sessions per User 1.45 Pageviews 41,242 Pages / Session 2.22 Avg. Session Duration 00:02:15 Bounce Rate 60.37% New Visitor Returning Visitor 25% 75% © 2019 Google All Users100.00% Users SESSIONS VS. PAGEVIEWS 18,539 Sessions vs. 41,242 Pageviews Session: The period of time a user is actively engaged with our website, app, etc. Pageview: Total # of pages viewed. Repeated views of a single page are counted. HOW ARE THEY FINDING US? 8,614 Organic Search 3,471 Direct 819 Social 354 Referral WHAT ARE THEY USING TO VIEW OUR SITE? WHAT ARE THEY SEARCHING FOR?WHAT PAGES ARE THEY VISITING? NEW VS. RETURNING VISITOR 10,893 New Visitors 3,637 Returning Visitors WHAT CAN WE LEARN? Park and Rec events and amenities continues to bring a high level of traffic to the city’s website. Traffic was up considerably from last month, largely due to Feb Fest and the Medallion Hunt.