Emailed CommentsFrom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Steve Albrecht <salbrecht8791 @gmail.com>
Tuesday, February 26, 2019 12:20 PM
Aanenson, Kate
Prince's land development proposal
We are in favor of the PUD plan with 54 acres set aside for lake Ann park expansion
We live at 6951 Tecumseh Lane in Chanhassen
Thanks
1
Flom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
timleberle@gmail.com
Tuesday, February 26, 2019 12.47 PM
Aanenson, Kate
Prince land development
Please support the PUD plan to give the city as much parkland as possible.
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
:)
1
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Nick Lawson <nicklawson3l 1 @gmail.com>
Tuesday, February 26,2019 2:21 PM
Aanenson, Kate
Prince land/Development oPinion
Hello Kate,
I just wanted to extended my opinion on the proposal of the Prince land by my house.
Of the options that have been brought to my attention I would vote for the "Proposed PUD" option that
maintains as much of the beautiful woods as possible.
My family moved to Chanhassen in 2015 into the Greenwood shores neighborhood and my 3 kids, wife and
myself as well as most of our neighborhood use and enjoy those woods every summer.
It would be a shame to let them be developed if there is a viable option to save them that is on the table'
part of what makes Chanhassen so great is its parks and natural woods. Its something you cant get back once its
given up.
Fl"ur. do all that you can to save that area for future generations to use and enjoy and not just reminisce about
how great it was when we were young..
Thanks for your time.
Ill see you on the 5th.
--*t"U ru*ron - 612.232.3464
7071 Redman Ln, Chanhassen, MN 55317
]
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jim Rosendahl <jimr@systium.com>
Tuesday, February 26, 2019 3:48 PM
Aanenson, Kate
City Council
Galpin Boulevard Property
As a resident of Chanhassen and the Greenwood Shores neighborhood for 24 years I am in favor of the Proposed PUD. lt
would be a big plus for Lake Ann Park!
Jim Rosendahl
7090 Tecumseh Lane
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kate,
Stephen Barnes <s.m.barnes@gmail.com>
Tuesday, February 26,2019 3:49 PM
Aanenson, Kate
Prince Property Development
I just wanted to make known my support for the PUD plan (not the original plan). I hope this helps guide the
negotiations and approvals by the council.
Thanks!
-Steve Barnes
7100 Utica Lane
Chanhassen, MN 55317
612.237.0660
5
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Wednesday, February 27,2019 9:11 AM
Steckling, Jean
Fwd: Prince's Land proposal.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message :
From: Mike Boehm <mikeboehml I1474@y
Date: February 27,2019 at 9:01:50 AM CST
To: "kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us"
<kaanenson@ci.chanhas , "council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us"
<council(Eci.chanhassen. mn.us)
Subject: Prince's Land ProPosal.
Reply-To: "mikeboehml I 1474@yahoo.com" <mikeboehml 1 1474@y
Hello,
Just sending an email in case I can not make it to the March 5th meeting.
I am heavily in favor of the proposed PUD. I can not support the concept plan.
Thank you
Mike Boehm
G
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Wednesday, February 27,2019 2:20 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Lake Ann/Susan Development
From: Chad Johnson <chadmtka@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27 ,2019 11:47 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Lake Ann/Susan Development
Good morning Kate,
I wanted to reach out to you via email since I will not be able to attended the City councils meeting on the Lake Ann/
Susan development project. I have been a resident in the greenwood shores neighborhood for over 17 years. My family
and I have enjoyeO the natural beauty of this area and would like to keep it that way for others. Everything from the paved
path that reaches the length of the east side of Ann up to the park, to the foot paths that split between Susan into dense
woodlands has kept this i one of a kind area available for everyone to enjoy. With the minimal disturbance of the
southside with the exception of a park and additional trails, ln my opinion, the PUD plan would be the best way to
accomplish this.
Sincerely,
The Johnson Family
'7
?
Steckling, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Wednesday, February 27 ,2019 2:22 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: 16 residents support Proposed PUD of Galpin property
From: Barry Da llavalle <barry.dallavalle@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27 ,2019 1:55 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.cha nhassen.mn.us>
Cc: City Council <Council@ci.cha nhassen.mn.us>
Subject: 15 residents support Proposed PUD of Galpin property
To Chanhassen Planning Commission and City Council,
The following residents unanimously support the Proposed PUD plan for the Galpin property. We wish to thank
Lennar and our city planners while working with the community to achieve this well-conceived proposal. We
urge its recommendation. Our reasons are stated at the bottom of this letter.
Scott and Tamara Sather 7090 Utica Ln
Mike and Kressin Krause 7050 Utica Ln
Tim and Sharon McCotter 7000 Utica Ln
Bill and Joanne Lambrecht 6990 Utica Ln
Barry and Laura Dallaval-le 6960 Utica Ln
Daryl and Kim Weispfennlg 6930 Utica Ln
Dal-e and Gloria Carlson 6900 Utica Ln
Pat Mohr and Maureen Lord Mohr 6890 Utica Terrace
Ron and Mary Knudten 5850 Utica Terrace
Rob Long and Louise Ou-Yang 6830 Utica Terrace
Chris and Nicole Liwienski 612L Point Lake Lucy
Bryan and Bonnie McCoskey 6'720 Point Lake Lucy
Matt and Suzanne Woods 61 45 Lakeway Drive
Betsy RandaII 1571 Lake LucY Rd
John and Anne Wicka 1501 Lake Lucy Rd
Al and Mary Weingart 1685 Steller Ct
Reasons supporting our recommendation:
l. More green space to mitigate runoff damage to Lakes Lucy and Ann and the Riley Creek watershed. Many
of the co-signers here have willingly contributed significant time and money to control the invasive plant
growth in Lake Lucy each year.
2. More green space for the surrounding community to enjoy the natural beauty and numerous wildlife of both
lakes and their environs.
3. Preserve the long-envisioned legacy of Lake Ann Park.
Respectfully submitted,
Barry Dallavalle
6960 Utica Ln
952-737-8433
6
{
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Pat Harding <PSJCAHarding@msn.com>
Wednesday, Fefiuary 27,2019 8:39 PM
Aanenson, Kate
Support for PUD
Dear Ms. Aanenson,
We would like to voice our support for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the land surrounding
Lake Ann. We believe that dedicating the land as park space would the best option for the City of Chanhassen
and for Carver County. Than k you for taking into consideration the input of the residents in making this
decision.
Sincerely,
Patrick Harding
1
/o
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Anna Harding <hardil 80@umn.edu>
Wednesday, February 27,2019 8:41 PM
Aanenson, Kate
Support for PUD
Dear Ms. Aanenson,
We would like to voice our support for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the land surrounding
Lake Ann. We believe that dedicating the land as park space would the best option for the City of Chanhassen
and for Carver County. Thank you for taking into consideration the input ofthe residents in making this
decision.
Sincerely,
Anna Harding
Stecklino. Jean
1
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear Ms. Aanenson,
Suzanne Harding <psjcaharding@gmail.com>
Thursday, February 28, 2019 4:25 AM
Aanenson, Kate
Support for PUD
We would like to voice our support for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the land surrounding
Lake Ann. We believe that dedicating the land as park space would the best option for the City of Chanhassen
and for Carver County. Thank you for taking into consideration the input of the residents in making this
decision.
Sincerely,
Suzanne Harding
1
/I
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Alyson Duneman <alysond23@gmail.com>
Thursday, February 28,2019 6:31 AM
Aanenson, Kate
Galpin Boulevard PropertY PUD
Dear Planning Commission Director,
I would just like to send a quick word in my support of the PUD plan.
In an effort to preserve the invaluable beauty our lake shore and our highly sought after and well cared for Lake
Ann Park, I am strongly requesting that the city does approve the concept plan.
Kind Regards,
Alyson Duneman
612-272-6297
i3
Stecklinq, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28,2019 9:17 AM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Lake Ann/Susan Development
From: Chad Johnson <chadmtka@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27,2019 11:47 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Lake Ann/Susan Development
Good morning Kate,
I wanted to reach out to you via email since I will not be able to attended the City councils meeting on the Lake Ann/
Susan development project. I have been a resident in the greenwood shores neighborhood for over 17 years. My family
and I have enjoyed the natural beauty of this area and would like to keep it that way for others. Everything from the paved
path that reaches the length of the east side of Ann up to the park, to the foot paths that split between Susan into dense
woodlands has kept this a one of a kind area available for everyone to enjoy. With the minimal disturbance of the
southside with the exception of a park and additional trails, ln my opinion, the PUD plan would be the best way to
accomplish this.
Sincerely,
The Johnson Family
Steckling, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Include in the packet
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28, 2019 10:17 AM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Comments on Prince's Galpin Property
From: Hoffman, Todd <thoffman @ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 10:16 AM
To: Gerhardt, Todd <TGerhardt@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Fwd: Comments on Prince's Galpin Property
Sent fl'om ury Verizon, Samsung Galaxy surartphone
Original message
From: Marcia Mclean <dmclean602@email. >
Date:2128119 1002 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: "Ryan, Elise" <ERyan@ci.chanhass >, aaller@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, "Hoffinan, Todd"
<thoffinan@ci.chanhas >
Cc: Dianne <dmclean602@gmail. >
Subject: Comments on Prince's Galpin Property
Please share my thoughts at all meetings related to Prince's Galpin property. Thank you.
It has been legally accepted that Prince Rogers Nelson left no will. He did, however, leave his thoughts, his
views, and his philosophy. One only has to look at his discography and approach the lyrics on literal and
figurative levels. One only has to consider his many philanthropic endeavors. One only has to see the
devastation he felt upon the loss of his child.
Thus, I petition all parties involved to rethink the "Galpin project" in light of what Prince would have
wanted. I propose that the property be given to the city of Chanhassen to become an extension of Lake Ann
with an Arts Center and a playground for children with disabilities within its boundaries.
Would this be easy to do at this point? No. Consider Prince's famous work ethic and it can be done, however.
He loved Chanhassen and it is time for Chanhassen to show its love for him.
To obtain the property and create this adjunct Paisley Park, inclusive, accepting and a place where people
can play, refresh, and just be, funding would be necessary. Create a 50lc(3)? Endless resources are "out there".
There is no doubt that the "Purple Family" all over the world would respond, as well as the PRN Alumni
Foundation, the People of Paisley Park, the Timberwolves, the Lyn*, Tavis Smiley, Spike Lee, Oprah Winfrey,
Sheila E., his photographers, and COUNTLESS others. They could give monitarily and/or in creative and
imaginative ways. Further, would his heirs donate a record from the Vault to raise money? A "Go Fund Me"
Account could be created?
Prince always went to "The Max". He sang "When I go, I go, I go to the Max". Let's all continue affirming
his legacy by doing exactly that "4 him".
/ Ll
Marcia Mclean
110 Stratton Ct
Columbia SC29210
2
'll
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Friday, March 01,2019 11:46 AM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Addendum to Email Marcia Mclean sent 2-28-19
From: Andrew Aller <aaller@mchsi.com>
Sent: Friday, March L,2OL911:33 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen'mn.us>
Subject: Fwd: Addendum to Email Marcia McLean sent 2-28-19
Addendum to yesterday email
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Marcia Mclean <dmclean602@gnail.com>
Date: March 1,2019 at9:40:34 AM CST
To : eryan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, thoffrnan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, aaller@mchsi.com
Cc : Dianne <dmclean602@ernail. co
Subject: Addendum to Email Marcia Mclean sent 2-28-19
Please consider these additional thoughts.
Yesterday a friend asked me why I was writing to you. I replied it was because I felt a
connection to Chanhassen. From the first time I came up there, I loved it. Perhaps, it is because I
grew up in and lived in a town with a seemingly similar character and "rhythm of life". In my
opinion, unfortunately, my hometown has not evolved positively. Farmland and woods have
been consumed by developers and the town is filled with so many housing developments and
endless cars. While I realize progress and change is inevitable and typically necessary, the
officials in my city did not appear to be very thoughtful in their decision-making.
Thus, I respectfully encourage you, members of government, in Chanhassen to consider the
environmentai effects of the decisions you make about the Prince Galpin Property. Land is a
limited commodity and environmentally sensitive. There are many places housing can be
constructed. Further, I continue to encourage all involved to think about using it in a manner that
would have been Prince-approved and benefit ALL of the people of Chanhassen and be in
keeping with the uniqueness and specialness of the city.
I do not want what happened to my hometown to happen to Chanhassen.
Sincerely,
Marcia Mclean
/5
From:
Sent:
TO:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:44 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Planned Unit Development
From: Ray Gaylord <rgaylord@qualitymold-inc.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 li42 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subiect: Planned Unit Development
We would like to voice our opinion on the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for land surrounding Lake Ann.
believe that dedicating the land as park space isthe best optio n for the City of Cha n hassen and Carver County.
Thank you for your consideration,
Pat and Sue Ha rding
Q Virus-free. www.avast.com
lc
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28,2019 3:53 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Galpin Boulevard Property PUD
From: Alyson Duneman <alysond23@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 28,2079 6:31 AM
To: Aa nenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.m n. us>
Subject: Galpin Boulevard Property PUD
Dear Planning Commission Director,
I would just like to send a quick word in my support of the PUD plan.
In an effort to preserve the invaluable beauty our lake shore and our highly sought after and well cared for Lake
Ann Park, I am strongly requesting that the city does approve the concept plan.
Kind Regards,
Alyson Duneman
612-272-6297
t?
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28,2019 3:54 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW 7141 Galpin Boulevard Comments & Pictures
DS-City Development - Aug 2018.pptx
From: david senior <davidtsenior@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 8,2OL87:57 PM
To: Aa nenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.m n.us>
Cc: Trish Ann Wisell <trish.wisell@yahoo.com>
Subject: 7141Galpin Boulevard Comments & Pictures
Hi Kate - my wife & I bought the property located at7431 Windmill Drive, Chanhassen just 12 months
ago. We love the neighborhood, neighbors and City. The Prince property development as proposed I have
concerns about how close the Concept plan comes to the back of all neighbors property lines without any
significant tree buffer, and considering the existing wetlands which do not seem to have been correctly
considered.
Our property gives a unique insight into why this area is so wet as we have a city storm drain in our back
yardi I have attached 2 slides that show the back yard & the view of the Prince property from our backyard
showing the wetlands & outlet from the storm drain.
I understand the desire of the City to expand the parkland, but have to agree with the 2 Planning Commission
Council members & many neighbors that had serious reservations on the plan as submitted in the July meeting.
I just want to add our voices to that concern as we were on vacation during the last meeting time.
I recognize you may not have time to come visit, but we do extend that offer given the gravity of what is being
proposed.
Best Regards,
David & Trish Senior
oIIe=az.antx
fiHFE;
7t ;IE
=5EIE=;lr;F=lAfr=
g=firH
r==r;--r-uZt
ntfiHjE=><llJr-=uJuJE
:
aot
IJJJfo
mz
I
o-J
o
FtT'N
t,oll
a
UJ
:)aLz
J
o-
F
o-
IIJozoo
Ft
ITJ(Lto)tOo
E
=oO:<Jo
H#>zoo
z
to
=toFa
ua>o
9eurJ
ilH
:
aot,
IIJJfo
mz
I
o-J
o
!Ft!FN
Eo
lJ.aul
:)aIz
J
o-
F
o-
IJJozoo
?. at!
r9
From:
Sent:
To:
Subiect:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28, 20'19 3:54 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Proposed Development on GalPin
--.-Original Message---
From: Chrissy Boberg <cnboberg@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 28,2OL812:15 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
subject: Proposed Development on Galpin
I am writing in in support of the proposed development of the land off of Galpin. My family and I have lived in
Chanhassen for over 10 years and currently live at 1321 Heather Court. We live close to Lake Ann and have enjoyed that
and other parks in the area. After looking at the planes it looks like the developer is offering up to the city around 100 of
the 188 acres. Ofthe 1OO acres given to the city it appears the plan has the Lake Ann Park expanded to the west side of
the lake. We have often visited that park and it would be wonderful to be able to walk almost entirely around the lake
with this expansion. lt seems very generous and responsible of the developer to offer such a large part of the property
to the city to preserve green space for all to use and enjoy. we strongly hope that the city supports this plan at the
upcoming meetings.
Thank you,
Mlke Boberg and Family
1
rq
Steckling, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28,2019 3:54 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: draft for consideration
From: Gord ie Ham pson <gord ie. ha m pson @cushwa ke.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 26,2078 2:01 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: FW: draft for consideration
Dear City Council, Planning Commission and Staff:
Attention: Kate Aanenson: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
My family and I have lived in Ghanhassen for 26 yearsi at 7003 Sandy Hook Circle. We understand that the 188
acres on Galpin Road is being considered for development. I have reviewed both plans that the developer has
submitted to the city. We very strongly support the plan which shows the majority of the units on the west side
of the property. Not sure how the developer was pensuaded up to this point, however, it seems pretty amazing
that they are offering to deed approximately 100 acres to the City of Chanhassen. This would really open up the
two lakes which have been non-accessible until now! This seems like a huge win for everyone in the
community! We understand that the developer could legally develop adjacent to the lake as presented in the first
plan.
We hope the city supports the second plan proposed by the developer at the Planning Commission meeting July
17th. On behalf of our family, we would enthusiastically express our support for the second plan of the proposed
project.
Thank you,
Gordie Hampson and Family.
Gordie Hampson
Senior Director
Brokerage Services
Direct: +1952 465 3310
Mobile: +1612 366 6139
gordie. hampson@cushwake. com
3500 American Blvd W, Suite 200
Bloomington, MN 55431 | USA
cushmanwakefield.com
The information contained in this email (including any attachments) is confidential, may be subject to legal or other professional
1
privilege and contain copyright material,
and is intended for use by the named recipient(s) only.
Access to or use of this email or its attachments by anyone else is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. lf you are not the
intended recipient(s), you may not use, disclose,
copy or distribute this email or its attachments (or any part thereof), nor take or omit to take any action in reliance on it. lf you have
received this email in error, please notify
the sender immediately by telephone or email and delete it, and all copies thereof, including all attachments, from your system. Any
confidentiality or privilege is not waived
or lost because this email has been sent to you by mistake.
Although we have taken reasonable precautions to reduce the risk of transmitting software viruses, we accept no liability for any
loss or damage caused by this email or its
attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unapproved access.
2
)<>
Steckling, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28,2019 3:55 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Proposed Galpin Plan
From: Dewing Scott <dewscott@Email.com>
Sent: Monday, July 23,20L810:24 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaa nenson@ci.chanhassen.m n.us>
Subject: Proposed Galpin Plan
Attention Kate Aanenson;
My famity and I have lived in Chanhassen for 20 yeans, currently at 6735 Mulberry Circle. We understand the 188
acres on Galpin Road is being considered for development. ! have had a chance review both plans the developer
has submitted to the city. We strongly support the plan, which shows the majority of the units on the east side of
the property.
It is a great position to have the Developer to agree to offer approximately 100 acres to the city of
Ghanhassen. Everybody in the community and area will benefit from this layout with the ability to walk it and
enjoy the added space. We spend a lot of time outdoors and look fonrvard to seeing this preserved for all. Please
express my famities' support for the project. We understand the developer could legally develop adiacent to the
lake. We hope the city supports the second plan proposed by the developer at upcoming Planning Commission
meetings.
Thank you,
- Scott Dewing and Family
)l
Steckling, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28,2019 3:55 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW 7 141 Galpin PUD Concept
From: Tim Nordberg <nord0296@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July L9,2O!8 3:11 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.m n.us>
Subject:7141 Galpin PUD Concept
Re: 7l4l Galpin PUD Concept
Hi Kate,
I attended the 7l4l Galpin PUD Concept Review session on Tuesday to learn more about the Galpin Concept and really appreciated
the opportunity to learn more about the process, the city and developer's ideas and public's opinions on the matter. I know the
session's public commentary has passed, but I wanted to take the time to send over some of my own thoughts, many came up in
retrospect of attending the meeting and hearing what was said. Hopefully you can share this with anyone involved in the back-and-
forth with the Concept Development.
One takeaway I had from the meeting I had was few proposed solutions or additional ideas to consider. Nearly all in the public
seemed clearly worried about environmental impact and preservation or trees / nature, while clearly the developer cares most about
economics, i.e. profit. The two notions aren't necessarily polar opposites (developer profit vs environmental impacts), but they
definitely trade offeach other.
I wonder if on the South side of the development the path connection into Lake Ann's park system could be considered along the north
edge of, within, or near the current tree cover. It would help with several of the concerns I heard in the meeting:
o Poorly or under marked wetland area within the Southern trees - it is really wet there, with often standing water for 4 months
of the year. Development would impact the environment due to filling in the space, but also potentially push water back on
other existing properties that back up to the land.
. Buffer between current homes and new development - especially important if realistically considering 55' lots in this area
with high percentage lot coverage. A proper buffer should add value and desire to the lots abutting it new development
making it a positive for current residents and developers alike.
o Preservation of Trees - during the meeting I heard this was a priority within the city overall within long term plans (i.e. 2040
review). It may be true that "replacing" if removed trees is technically allowed, but can you consider planting hundreds of
new, young trees the same as replacing 30-50+ year old woods equivalent and adequate "replacement"?
Hopefully it can be considered, the idea came to mind while I was enjoying a run along the Bluff Creek trail, portions nicely tucked
into and around the trees are one ofthe things I really enjoy since moving to Chanhassen a few years ago. I have come to appreciate
the City's commitment to excellence in Parks, Trails and outdoor activities (Walking, Bicycling, Running). I would love for this
commitment to hold true in new developments rather than see "Trail Connections" run along a sidewalk or within a dense
neighborhood.
Further items I had thought of, and wanted to reiterate with my communication:
l. The Galpin Road project really needs to be closely tied to this planning. The proposed development seems to be roughly the
size of Longacres, but it is effectively forced to put all traffic on Galpin while Longacres has Hwy 41 on the West
Side. Galpin is already difficult to manage (as a pedestrian or in a car) near Majestic due to traffic flow including numerous
cars rolling through or completely missing the stop signs at Sugar Bush Park (Galpin and Brinker). Trafhc from nearly 200
additional homes would have a significant impact here that may be difficult to properly estimate with a simple traffic
study. Galpin to the North (into Shorewood / Hennepin Cty) and Lake Lucy Rd do not seem suitable for significant increases
either.
2. Housing density and lot coverage may be within rules (perhaps pushing the limits), but when I look at similar new
developments I always worry about places for small children to play without ending up on the road. Cul-de-sacs help
(because they somewhat create a safe place _in the road_ to play, but in the concept plan the cul-de-sacs were all targeting the
"Empty Nester" home styles (likely' without small children). Often in these new developments I see the streets lined with
signs and flags (i.e. "Drive like your children live here", "Caution kids at play"), highlighting the safety risks of such layouts,
density and lot coverage.
3. I don't fully understand the need to line up the road connections to Hunter and Longacres, especially the alignment with
Hunter seems to have an immediate challenge with the large holding pond / wetland space adjacent to the road. Relaxing this
need may help offer more favorable layouts within the usable land on the properfy.
On the positive side, I really appreciate the concept that expands Lake Ann's paths and the City's long term plans for further trails and
connections. The more options we have, the better for the enjoyment and health of those in the community. I really believe these
concepts are primary drivers that attract people to moving to the City of Chanhassen in the first place -- it was for my wife and I.
Thinking of large developments like this reminds me of the praise early Minneapolis planners now receive in setting up the
groundwork for their interconnected trail system (Lake and River trails, Parkway system, etc...). This is a key chance to ensure we
develop an exceptional shared natural resources (Lakes and Trails) for everyone in our community to enjoy for many years to come.
Ultimately I agree with the Planning Committee's final points, especially that neither of the concepts proposed thus far seem to respect
the land, but with enough effort an acceptable compromise between the Environment, the City, current residents and the developers
could be made.
Best Regards,
Tim Nordberg
2126 Majestic Way, Chanhassen
2
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28,2019 3:55 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Galpin Property - PUD
From: Meredith McGuirk <meremcguirk@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 77,2018 5:L5 PM
To: Aa nenson, Kate <kaanenson @ci.cha nhassen.mn'us>
Subject: Fwd: Galpin Property - PUD
July 17,2018
Planning Commission
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O.Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Planning Commission Members.
We recently learned of the Planned Unit Development for the Galpin Property, formerly owned by Prince. We write today to formerly register our opposition
to the plan.
We are residents of Chanhassen in the Lucy fudge neighborhood, adjacent to the PUD land. lnterestingly, the concept review offered by Lennar on page 2
states that the "existing neighborhood to the North (Ashling Meadows) provides two existing road stubs to the subject property." This is inaccurate. Ashling
Meadows provides one existing road stub, while our neighborhood, a I 6 unit custom home development contains the other. The current plan proposes direct
access through the Lucy fudge neighborhood.
We oppose the PUD in its cunent form for the following reasons:
o Safety. We are a 16 home development currently attached to a 45 home development, commonly called Ashling Meadows. The one street leaving
our community is already heavily flooded with traffic from Ashling Meadows. With one access road out of neighborhood residents cutting through
often travel well beyond the speed limit and igrrore stop signs, causing significant hazards to the small children living in our neighborhood. The
same road proposed as a pass through to the PUD property contains a bus stop for dozens of elementary children aged k-5. I cannot imagine the
additional safety hazard caused by the increased flow oftraffic from another adjoining neighborhood twice the size. Simply stated, the current plan
is only acceptable ifthe Commission disregards public safety to the children in our neighborhood.
o Environmental. I think it is reasonable that even with the VERY BEST construction and water management techniques, given the proximity of
proposed development to Lakes Lucy and Ann, it is, as a practical matter, impossible to prevent harmful phosphorous runoff(especially at the
outset), and to furthermore expect the preservation ofLake Ann's pristine quality and clarity in concert with the proposed development would be
naive and reckless.
o Please also refer to Donna and Brian Strauss' letter, dated July 4, 2018. We concur with all statements raised in their letter to the Commission and
City Council.
It is my sincere hope that the Planning Commission and City Council will consider altemative road access points. Alternatively I urge the Commission to
consider the development of a smaller community ending in a cul de sac connecting to our community that will be less hazardous and disruptive to current
community members. While I understand the desire to have several access points, I also find it alarming that the Commission would not consider the
disruptive and significant impact this will have on neighborhoods developed almost l5 years ago.
Sincerely,
Meredith and Greg McGuirk
1770Ltcy fudge Court
clJ-
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:55 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Galpin Development - Staff Report
From: j bra nda ll@aol.com <jbrandall@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2018 8:49 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Re: Galpin Development - Staff Report
Kate,
After reading the Staff Report I have a few questions:
Page 6 last paragraph:
I assume this paragraph is referring to the North lots which are the only ones listed as 15,000 sf if
so the number of lots may not be correct.
Would you please explain why/how the development plan is not consistent with the Park Comp
Plan
Looking at scenario 2 and reading the small print, it looks as though they will be requesting variances'
for lot area size on both the central and south lots.
Betsy
---Original Message----
From: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
To: jbrandall <jblalde!!(Da.Ql@!0>
Sent: Tue, Jul 10,201810:26 am
Subject: RE: Galpin Development
Betsy,
The developer is requesting the PUD, which preserves the large area adj acent to Lake Ann. The staff report
should be available by the end ofthe day Thursday. You can address any concems to me and I will forward
then to the Planning Commission and the City Council
Kate
Kathryn Aanenson, AICP
Community Development Direclor
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PA. 952.227 .1139
FX. 952.227.11'tO
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
From: iEa!dal!@iq!.es!0 <.i!ra-!.d.a.!l@.q-q]-!o.!0>
sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 10:19 AM
To:Aanenson, Kate<@>
Subject: Galpin Development
Kate,
When might the staff reporUrecommendations be posted for the development?
Do you know which concept plan the city might be recommending?
Pleases let me know if I should be directing my questions to someone else'
Regards,
Betsy Randall
1571 Lake Lucy Road
Av
Steckling, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:56 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Galpin Blvd Proposed Development
-:-Original Message---
From: Julie Witt <juliewitt20@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, July L4,20L811:01 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Re: Galpin Blvd Proposed Development
Thanks Kate. I appreciate the information. l'm not sure I will be able to join future meetings so I will take you up on the
offer to leave my feedback with you. Comments are below.
My vote if I had to choose between the 2 would be for concept #2. This concept builds 199 homes on 88 acres. Why this
plan is better:
1. Less impact to wetlands. One of the things I love about Chanhassen is how much natural land there is. I am concerned
how many trees the first concept will take down and the disruption to nature it will create. I would love to see
Chanhassen utilize the undeveloped acres for trails instead. lt is a beautiful piece of land and I would appreciate the
ability for the public to use part of it.
2. Variety of price ranges. 55' and 90' lots will probably still be above average home prices especially with the
opportunity for families to add upgrades (having priced Lennar homes before).
One question, would the city consider adding trails for biking and/or hiking to the undeveloped land?
Thanks for you consideration as you assess the available plans.
Julie Witt
> On Jun 27 ,2018, at 8:01 AM, Aa nenson, Kate <kaanenson @ci.chanhassen.mn.us> wrote:
> J ulie,
>Therewill be a num ber of opportunities for you to give input into the proposed development. Thereisaconcept
review going to the Planning Commission on July 17th. You can review the staff report online on the city's website and
should be available on July 12th. You can attend that meeting or submit your comments in writing to me and I will share
with the Planning Commission and City Council. The staff report outlines the review process, after the concept review
they will come go through preliminary plat with another public hearing at the Planning Commission. The developer has
expressed they would have a neighborhood meeting.
> Kate
> Kathryn Aanenson, AICP
> Community Development Director
> CITY OF CHANHASSEN
> PH. 952.227 .t139
1
> FX. 952.227 .t7t0
> www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
> ---Original Message---
> From: Julie Witt <juliewitt20@gma il.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26,2018 7:00 PM
> To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn. us>
> Subject: Galpin Blvd Proposed Development will ou
> Hi Kate,
> Will the public be able to give input to the decision for this development?
> Thanks,
> Julie
2
J9
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28,2019 3:56 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: 18-12 Galpin Development
From: Barry Da llavalle <barry.dallavalle@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, July 9,2O!82:46 PM
To: Aa nenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.cha nhassen.m n. us>
Subject: 18-12 Galpin Development
Hi Ms. Aanenson,
My name is Barry Dallavalle and am current President of the Lake Lucy Homeowners Association. As you
might expect, our association membership is interested in how this development moves forward. Currently,
there appears to be two alternatives, a "density trade" and a "yield plan".
Has the planning group settled on either? Or would the selection be the subject of the planning commission
meeting on the lTth?
Would you or another on your staff be interested in receiving our comments prior to or at the meeting?
Thank you,
Barry Dallavalle
6960 Utica Ln
952-737-8433
1
.1(
Stecklinq, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:57 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Prince's land off Galpin
---Original Message---
From: Holly Nelson <hollysn9@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20,2018 9:12 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn us>
Subject: Prince's land off Galpin
ljust read through the development plans from Lennar for Prince's land. Those 55'and 55' lots make me sad. I was
hoping this would be an elite development in Chan and instead it's sadly dense. I read their justification that if they
spread it out they'd fit that many lots but are condensing it for the parkland. lt would be so much nicer to have the 90'
lots through the whole development and have the park land too. This is valuable land. Please don't let them waste it.
Holly Nelson
1
3t-1
From:
Sent:
To:
Subiect:
Aanenson, Kate
r[liiioiv,'rebruary 28, 2o1e 5:oe PM
PffiI[?fiJ"3:rpin Propertv comment
From: Marcia Mclean <dmclean602@gmail'com>
Date: February 28,2019 at12:59:46 PM CST
To: aaller@mchsi.com
Subject: Prince Galpin Property Comment
Please share my thoughts at Galpin Property meetings'
It has been legally accepted that Prince Rogers Nelson left no will' He did,
however, leave his ihorrghtr, his views, and his philosophy' One only has to look
at his discography and approach the lyrics on literal and figurative levels' One
only has to-consiier his many philanthropic endeavors. One only has to see the
devastation he felt upon the loss of his child'
=- ih;;, I petition uil purti.r involved to rethink the "Galpin projectu in light^of
what Prince would have wanted. I propose the property be given to the city of
Chanhassen to become an extension of the Lake Ann Park, with an Arts Center
and a playground for children with disabilities to be developed within its
boundaries.
would this be easy to do at this point? No. consider Prince's famous work
ethic and it can be done. He loved Chanhassen. It is time for Chanhassen to show
its love for him.
To obtain the property and create this adjunct Paisley Park, inclusive,
accepting, and where people can play refresh and just be, funding will be
requiredlCreate a SOf ct:) perhaps? There is no doubt that people from the
,,Purple Family,, around the world, the PRN Alumni Foundation, the People of
PaisleyPark,thefimUerwotves,theLyn*'TravisSmiley'SpikeLee'Oprah
Winfrey, Sheila e., t,i, pt,otographers,-and countless others will respond either
monetarily o, ir.r"uiiri u"aI*^uginative ways to gather resources' Maybe his
heirs will donate a song from the Vaull
prince always *"r,io ,,The Max". He sang "whenJ gg,I go,I go to the Max"'
Let,s ali continue and affirm his legacy by doing exactly that "4 him"'
Thank You.
Marcia Mclean
110 Stratton Ct'
Columbia SC29210
lr
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Friday, March 01,2019 8:06 AM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Development plan
From: Ron Robey <trapshooterl 100@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 28,2019 6:38 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Development Pla n
I'm in favor of the proposed pud plan to have more green space and protect the lakes
Thanks Ron Robey
J?
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Friday, March 01,2019 12:27 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Lennar Galpin subdivision
From: Andrew Dunema n <a nd rew@bulkreefsupply.com>
Sent: Friday, March 'J.,2019 12:23 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Lennar Galpin subdivision
Kate - I wanted to drop you a quick note supporting the Proposed PUD version of the Galpin Subdivision project. l'm a
resident of Greenwood Shores (7050 Redman Lane)just on the other side of Lake Ann. My family and I along with our
neighbors love hiking through the woods around Lake Ann year round. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to create a
space that all residents of Chanhassen and the surrounding area can enjoy for generations to come.
l, along with my neighbors, strongly oppose the Concept Plan which will eliminate this valuable recreational area for
good. I attached a few pictures of our kids hiking here this last August. I look forward to attending the meeting on March
5th to express my support for protecting this priceless area.
Andrew Duneman
lntegrotor
Direct:763.231.9061
Cell:612.242.9838
Andrewt@bulkreefsuoolv.com
BUI.K REEF
SUPPLY
3o
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Friday, March 01 , 2019 12:26 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: l'm in favor of the proposed PUD Plan
From: Mike Harding (mharding) <mharding@cisco.com>
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 L1:58 AM
To: City council <council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen mn.us>
Sublect: I'm in favor of the proposed PUD Plan
Kate and Council members - l'm urging you to back the PUD plan.
Please help us maintain some community green space and keep our city an outstanding place to live.
Mike Harding
Mobile: 612-860-5584
mhardinq@cisco.con-l
1
3r
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Friday, March 01,2019 2:12PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: PUD - Lake Ann park space
From: Tim Harding <t.h@visi.com>
Sent: Friday, March L,2OL91:59 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci'chanhassen'mn'us>
Subject: PUD - Lake Ann Park sPace
Dear Ms Aanenson,
I would like to voice my support for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the land surrounding Lake
Ann.
I believe that dedicating the land as park space would the best option for the residents of the City of
Chanhassen
and Carver County.
Thank you for your careful consideration in making this important decision.
Sincerely,
Tim Harding
{-
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Monday, March 04, 2019 8:1 1 AM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Suppo( for PUD plan
From: RICHARD MARIETTA MCLEOD <rmktm@msn.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 3, 2019 11:04 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson @ci.cha nhassen.mn.us>
Subiect: Support for PUD Plan
Dear Ms. Aanenson,
We are writin8 to voice our support for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the land
surrounding Lake Ann. We believe that this would be the best long-term option for the City of
chanhassen and carver county. we have friends who live near Lake Ann, and have enjoyed
spending time with them in this natural setting.
Thank you for your consideration,
Marietta and Rick Mcleod
13306 Kipling Ave So
Sava8e MN 55378
952-895-8676
rm ktm @ msn.com
3_3
February 27,2019
Mayor Ryan and Council Members:
Thank you for seeking public comment regarding the Galpin Boulevard property development. I
understand the two proposals and support the change from the Concept Plan to the Proposed PUD with
a density transfer. lunderstand the density transfer results in approximately4l lots to be transferred to
smaller parcels which will allow approximately 45 acres of land to be available for parkland. The density
transfer would benefit the wetlands by creating more green space for water runoff, natural filtration
and a buffer for the Lake Ann and Lake Lucy's water health. ln addition, a community with a strong park
system is a more desirable community, a more interactive community and a healthy community. The
hard work of Council, Planning Commission, City Staff and Lennar to create this option with a life time
benefit is much appreciated.
please approve the density transfer Proposed PUD in order to capture the land for public use and the
benefit of Chanhassen's residents.s
Sincerely,
Solvei and Todd Wilmot
7101 Shawnee Lane
Chanhassen, MN 55317
952-470-2360
cc: Chanhassen Planning commission
3t
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Tuesday, March 05, 2019 2:09 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Once in a life time opportunity! 100 acres on Ann & Lucy
From: Jon Rausch/USA <Jon.Rausch@cushwake.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 2:08 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: FW: Once in a life time opportunityl 100 acres on Ann & Lucy
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I understand that as a result of the work session last night l2/l/191, the council has requested that the
Developer re-present its latest plan to the Planning Commission. Additionally, the City is asking the
residents their opinion on the park, for example, residents are being asked " How important is the new
park to the residents"?
As I understand the project, the Developer is proposing to transfer density from the East side to the
West side of the property in order to preserve a laree oark alons the lake. This is INCREDIBLE!
For the sake of the land and our future generations enjoyment of this incredible green space, I would
strongly urge you to consider the density transfer, which would result in a 100 acre oark.
At Camo Tanadoona, we have an internal wetland comDlex that we eniov (ducks. qeese, deer. turkev
CllgL lt's amazing to see such a diverse wildlife on our property.
Outdoor experts believe that contact with nature leads to improved mental health, lower stress levels,
and enhanced cognitive skills!
Please feel free to contact me anytime. Again, to be clear - | support the transfer of density to the
West side of the site and the preservation of the 100 acres on Lake Ann and Lucy, especially given the
alternative of the Developer/Owner pursuing a development plan that would impact the land adjacent
to the lake. Which I understand they could do by code.
Thank you.
All my best,
Marnie
Marnie K, Wells
ch ief Executive Off icer
camp Fire Minnesota
Direct (612) 284-6816
t'lain (612 ) 235 7284
www. ca mpfiremn.oro
Find us on Facebook & Twitter
Light the fire within
The information contained in this email (including any attachments) is confidential, may be subject to legal or other professional
privilege and contain copyright material,
and is intended for use by the named recipient(s) only.
Access to or use of this email or its attachments by anyone else is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. lf you are not the
intended recipient(s), you may not use, disclose,
copy or distribute this email or its attachments (or any part thereof), nor take or omit to take any action in reliance on it. lf you have
received this email in error, please notify
the sender immediately by telephone or email and delete it, and all copies thereot including all attachments, from your system. Any
confidentiality or privilege is not waived
or lost because this email has been sent to you by mistake.
Although we have taken reasonable precautions to reduce the risk of transmitting software viruses, we accept no liability for any
loss or damage caused by this email or its
attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unapproved access.
Z7
Steckling, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Tuesday, March 05, 2019 3:24 PM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Lennar Galpin Boulevard Property Planned Unit Development
From: Julie Sorensen <Julie@TeamSorensen.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 3:23 PM
To: Ryan, Elise <ERyan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Sinclair, Jill <jsinclair@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; McDonald, Jerry
<J McDonald@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Tjornhom, Bethany <BTjornhom@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Coleman, Julia
<JColeman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Campion, Dan <DCam pion@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Aanenson, Kate
<kaanenson @ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; AlJaff, Sharmeen <SAlJaff@ci.cha nhassen.mn.us>; Generous, Bob
<bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Walters, MacKenzie <MWalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subiect: Lennar Galpin Boulevard Property Planned Unit Development
Thankful for Lake Ann Park!!l
My husband and I moved to Chanhassen 28 years ago. We actually bought our lot 29 years ago and could not afford to
build Initially. We were attracted by the natural beauty. We are so thankful the founding fathers of Chanhassen put
aside such a wonderful park - Lake Ann. We have picnicked, swam, fished and walked the paths as much as possible
over the past 28 years. lt has been a gift of tra nquility; sun rises, sunsets and quiet moments. So many of Chanhassen's '
current residents were attracted by the beauty and green space of Chanhassen. lt is a great place to enjoy life and raise
a family.
We are grateful for the comprehensive plan to make the north shore of Like Ann a park. We feel the City of Chanhassen
should not lose this opportunity to preserve this beauty of nature with little to no investment by the citizens of
Chanhassen.
What Lennar has proposed to have 41 acres added to the park at no cost to the city in exchange for increased density is
incredibly generous on their part. Money doesn't grow on trees. The concept that the city purchase the acreage instead
of allowing increased density is fiscally irresponsible. That is clearly only for the benefit ofadjacent nelghbors. lf thecity
were to pursue such a financial transaction, are the neighbors willing to pay for this through a special property tax
assessment against their property? lam guessing not. They want to entire city to unnecessarily pay money it doesn't
have. lf the city does have it, it should be used for other purposes or reduced property taxes in the future. When
lookinB at the density they are complaining about, the complaining neighborhoods aren't any different than the PUD's
proposed density. The proposed density is in keeping with the adjoining neighborhoods and property. The parkland
version also leaves more trees in place, especially on the north side where those neighbors are complaining about loss of
natural buffer. This park version is a gift by Lennar on multiple levels. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth. Even the
city purchase instead of density transfer would be fewer trees excluding the park land when comparing the two
versions. The park plan minimizes cost to the city and maximizes trees retainage. The City's logo is a tree leaf. Kind of
implies that we value maintaining as much green space as possible especially with mature trees. With the natural buffer
at the north side and the 90 foot lots on the south side, the plan completely complements adjacent neighborhoods for
consistency. Even the wetland segment benefits from increased tree borders in the park based plan. Again this
wouldn't be the case if the city purchased the density where the park is planned. The park plan basically is setup to
make lt appear the wetland is a part of the pa rk given the tree separation on the west and north perimeters of the
wetland. Lennar clearly bent over backwards to maximize parkland and natural areas with their new plan. lf
city/cltizens get to greedy and Lennar walks away, the next developer will not likely be as generous. The other financial
downside of the city purchasing the park acreage is reduce property tax basis. So any cost of an estimated 57 to S10
million is a clear misstatement of actual costs to the city. Losing the property tax revenue from those lots in perpetuity
is a staggering amount of revenue to the city. With what looks to be roughly 54 lots being taken offthe property tax
rolls, that is easily at least S2oo,OOO/year and likely much more based on size/quality of homes built on the lots.
Let's not think only of ourselves or our families, but what we can leave behind. Make Chanhassen a place people want to
stay, especially in a fiscally responsible way!
Greg and Julie Sorensen
2
3g
Steckling, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Wednesday, March 06, 2019 8:18 AM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Proposed Galpin PUD
From: Kathy O'Connor <kjoconnorl3@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 5,2O!9 11:08 PM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Fwd: Proposed Galpin PUD
Kate-
First of all, thank you all so much for sitting through the Public comment meeting tonight. It was wonderful to
witness a collaborative environment. Chanhassen residents are the best :)
1. NEED PLAN C!
I will say, I was surprised at the number of comments from residents who thought the proposed plan was an
EITHER/OR situation. Who wouldn't chose the "gift" of park land ?!?!?!
I have sat through all the meetings in person or via streaming and it was clear to me that a plan C had been
requested a few times. The council had challenged Lennar to come back with something creative, unique,
something Chanhassen could be proud of. I truly believe this gem of a property deserves something very
special. They need to get creative!
While Lennar listened to some neighborhood concerns and appeased Lake Lucy Ridge residents with no thru
street and the south side residents by addressing water run off, elevation, etc., they did nothing to addressing a
unique neighborhood - plan C. They also fluffed up the design by including entrance monuments, flowers,
etc......I'm soffy, those are a given. Not a concession!
The last thing we need is another Longacres, Ashling Meadows or Vasserman neighborhood. While I love
living in Longacres, I do NOT want another cookie cutter Lennar development, especially on this arnazing
property.
2. Need to address parking for any park land - I agree with Michael McGonigill that they also need to address
parking for any park land within the neighborhood development. There will be conflict between residents who
are parking on their neighborhood streets and trying to utilize the park. That is a given.
3. PLEASE Don't Settle - Please don't settle for just another Reflections on Lake Riley, Vasserman, Camden
Ridge, Ashling Meadows, Longacres - type neighborhood. This extraordinary piece of land deserves
extraordinary home in an extraordinary neighborhood with an extraordinary feel! An executive neighborhood
that draws people to Chanhassen. Don't allow this builder to come in and nueter this land! Any builder can
come in and do what they have propsed. Make them work for this pizel And if they won't, let's find someone
who will.
I have also sent this email to the City Council.
Kathy O'Connor
Resident Longacres
7124 Northwood Ct, Chanhassen, MN 55317.
612.309.1712
2
Steckling, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Wednesday, March 06, 2019 8:17 AM
Steckling, Jean
FW: Proposed Galpin PUD Development Proposed by Lennar Homes
From: Jim Aiken <jaiken299@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 8:25 PM
To: Aa nenson, Kate <kaanenson @ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Re: Proposed Galpin PUD Development Proposed by Lennar Homes
Dear Ms. Aanenson and Esteemed Commissioners:
I am a Chanhassen resident living at 751 Carver Beach Road. I am a professional geologist and have 25 years of
experience in reviewing development plans and performing environmental review on large development projects. I am
in no way connected with the proposer associated with the development.
Based on review of the proposal packet and staff recommendations, I find that the planned unit development (PUD)
proposal that is currently proposed (with the density transfer plan including a large 54 acre woodland buffer area along
the northwest side of Lake Ann) is thoughtful and represents an excellent opportunity for increasing and protecting
public access and water quality in Lake Ann. ltherefore strongly support the proposed development proposed by Lennar
on the former Prince Rogers Nelson estate.
My opinion is based on the following observations:
o The land is guided for residential development. lt will be developed and we will have new neighbors on this
land sooner or later.
o lf this plan is rejected there will be another, perhaps less accommodating plan eventually. The proposal
could be far worse including more homes and removing much of the woodland areas northwest of Lake
Ann. This would be disastrous and should never be supported it in any way.
o The development plan provides for significant buffer between the residential areas and lake shore with
stormwater runoff control and pre-treatment. The county and watershed requirements for runoff control are
substantial and proven to protect water quality.
o The provisions for tree preservation are substantial and In my experience, exceptional benefit of this
proposal
. I routinely bike along Galpin. Contrary to recent public comments, the existing traffic on Galpin is relatively
sparse and has adequate controls for safe and efficient egress and access. This road has been long planned for
expa nsion.
o The development will provide additional recreational and wildlife viewing opportunities for city
residents. Lake Ann is a favorite snowshoeing and fishing lake for our famlly and increased trail connections will
enhance these opportunities.
o Much of the opposition to these developments is fear of the unknown and uncertainty on how the existing
neighbors will adapt to the changes from the development. History shows that new developments in our area
work out fairly well.
. Unless you are descendent of one of the original settlers in the area (a nd I know a few), at one time, we
were ALL a new neighbors in Chanhassen. We are all part of change. The reality is we have no right to seek the
close the door on those who wish to join us in future.
. Recreational connection to lakes greatly enhances the value and quality of life in any city. Connection to
water is paramount. Looking at what the trails and lakes do for the City of Minneapolis, it appears likely that this
project will similarly result in benefits to all residents.
o I live near Lotus Lake and one problem is that when it was developed there were no modern stormwater
controls and no public imperative to improve access to lakefront via trails. The result is that water quality has
struggled and very few hiking and riding opportunities along the shores ofthis otherwise beautiful lake.
This project represents an opportunity. The Commission and the Council have rare chance to create a legacy for future
generations ofChanhassen residents. Please approvethe plan with the additional parkland for Lake Ann.
Thank you !
Jim Aiken, PG
2
4c
Steckling, Jean
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Aanenson, Kate
Thursday, March 07, 20191 1 :04 AM
Steckling, Jean
FW: How to Ensure the Top Notch "Prince" Property Has Top Notch Homes Built On lt
From: Art Roberts <artroberts3 @gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 7,2019 10:57 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Hoffman, Todd <thoffman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Henricksen,
Erik <EHenricksen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Brotzler, Andy <ABrotzler@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: How to Ensure the Top Notch "Prince" Property Has Top Notch Homes Built On lt
Kathryn: I am told you are the one who forwards this to the Planning Commission. Thanks.
A well known standard for ranking real estate is "Location/Location/Location".
The "Prince" property is truly a Top Notch, impressive property based on 3 Locations:
Location #1: Chanhassen itself is a highly rated, respected, sought after city.
Location #2: Homeowners will have easy access to an adjacent 50 acre park.
Location #3: Homeowners will have easy access to Lake Ann plus Lake Ann Park.
We should strive to have Top Notch homes filling up this Top Notch, impressive property.
Then, to allow for Top Notch homes to be built, we need to have larger properties/lots!
At the March 5th public meeting there was nearly unanimous consensus that the
"Proposed PUD", with no homes East of the wetland, provided the best street layout, by far.
But the current proposal, with its 121 65-foot lots, accommodates only smaller homes.
Lennar builds houses from small up to quite large. In the current Parade of Homes they are
showing homes from $300,000 all the way up to $2 million. Having larger properties/lots will
provide Lennar the space it needs to build homes that are a bit larger -- more Top Notch.
Thus, could the Planning Commission request that Lennar flesh out a "third
alternative" (which should take very little time)?
In place of the 121 65-foot lots in the current "Proposed PUD", and probably using the same street layout,
Lennar should redraw it using wider lots -- maybe SO-foot wide, for example.
Sure, there willbe fewer lots than the current 121 65-foot ones, yet, as offsets:
a) Each of the larger lots will be worth more dollars, plus
b) These larger lots will accommodate larger more expensive homes for Lennar to build.
Lennar should then "rerun the numbers" to check that the larger lots will:
a) Generate equivalent total dollars, thanks to both more expensive lots and homes.
b) Set a Top Notch home standard more in line with the "Prince" Top Notch property.
Let's develop this site with a level of home excellence matching this siters excellence.
Thank you for this opportunity to propose elevating this site to a true Top Notch development.
ArtRoberts artroberts3@8mail.com (952)484-0233
Homeowner's Association President
Vasserman Ridge Promenade [38 twinhomes]
(Northwest of Galpin Boulevard and Highway 5)