Agenda and Packet (2)
2019 Commissions Interview Schedule
FIRST MEETINGS IN APRIL:
Planning Commission - April 2, 2018
Environmental Commission - April 10, 2019
Senior Commission - April 18, 2019
Park & Rec Commission - April 23, 2019
City Council InterviewsEnvironmental Commission Interviews - February 13
February 25 (Monday):6:00Brian Smith (PRC 2nd Choice)
8:00Bhakti Modi (SC)6:15Ross Reeves (PRC 2nd Choice)
8:15Alice "Lisa" Lyon (SC)6:30
8:306:45Andrew Allen-NO SHOW
8:45Gerald Cook (PC)7:00Jeff Harken
9:00Laura Skistad (PC & PRC)
9:15 Planning Commission Interviews - February 19
9:30Andrew Aller (PC incumbent-coming from airport may be earlier)1stAntonio J. Fricano (SC 2nd Choice)
2ndBala Chintaginjala-NO SHOW WITHDRAWN
February 26 (Tuesday): 3rdDouglas Reeder (PRC 2nd Choice)
5:00Sandy Sweetser (PRC)4thGerald Cook
5:15Bill Hickey (PRC)5thLynn Pelto WITHDRAWN
Annette Stock-Lind
5:30Natalia Sander (PC-NO SHOW AT PC INTERVIEW) WITHDRAWN 6th
5:45Laurie Susla (PC)7thNatalia Sander-NO SHOW
6:00Jeff Harken (EC)8thJohn Kunitz
6:15Lynn Pelto (PC) WITHDRAW 9thLaurie Susla
6:30Steve Weick (PC incumbent)10thLaura Skistad (PRC 2nd Choice)
6:45Annette Stock Lind (PC)
7:00BREAKSenior Commission Interviews - February 21
7:15Rick Echternacht (PRC incumbent)4:10Ruth Lunde
7:30Cole Kelly (PRC incumbent)4:30Jim Camarata
7:45Haley Pemrick (PRC)4:50Alice "Lisa" Lyon
8:00Drew Allen (EC-NO SHOW AT EC INTERVIEW)5:10Bhakti Modi
8:15Brian Smith (EC & PRC)5:30Mike Schachterle
8:30Antonio Fricano (PC & SC)5:50Antonio Fricano (PC 1st Choice)
8:45Ruth Lunde (SC)
9:00Jim Camarata (SC)Park & Rec Commission Interviews - February 26
5:45Bill Hickey
March 11 6:00Laura Skistad
4:30Doug Reeder (PC & PRC)6:15Sandy Sweetser
4:45John Kunitz (PC)6:30Doug Reeder
5:00Bill Chappell (EC incumbent)6:45Ross Reeves
5:15Mike Schachterle (SC)7:00Brian Smith
5:30Ross Reeves (EC & PRC)7:15Haley Pemrick
5:45Matt Kutz (PRC-OUT OF COUNTRY FOR PRC INTERVIEW)
6:00Discuss Commission Appointments
Incumbents
All commission appointments will take place at the March 11, 2019 City Council Meeting
\[4\]
ARTICLE IV. - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Footnotes:
--- (4) ---
Cross reference—Park and recreation commission, § 14-16 et seq.; planning commission, § 15-16 et
seq.
State Law reference—Authority to establish advisory boards and commissions, M.S. § 412.621(2).
DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY
Sec. 2-46. - Appointment to city committees and commissions.
All vacancies on committees, commissions, and boards shall be advertised to seek applicants. The
city council may interview applicants before making appointment. With the exception of the housing and
redevelopment authority, all appointments shall be by majority vote of the city council. Once appointed, an
applicant shall serve until removed, with or without cause, by a four-fifths vote of the city council, until the
expiration of the term of appointment and following appointment of the applicant's successor. Vacancies
during a term shall be filled for the unexpired portion of the term.
Sec. 2-46.01. - Same—Generally.
The council determines the duties and exercises the powers of administrative boards or commissions.
However, the council may establish boards or commissions as set forth in this article to investigate subjects
or to perform quasi-judicial functions. Additional administrative boards or commissions shall be established
as required by law or for the administration of a municipal function jointly shared with another political
subdivision.
(Ord. No. 363, § 4, 1-12-04)
Sec. 2-46.03. - Planning commission.
(a)Commission established.The planning commission is established pursuant to the Minnesota
Municipal Planning Act, and has the powers and duties assigned to it by that Act, by this Code, and
state law. The planning commission is hereby designated the planning agency of the city pursuant to
the Municipal Planning Act.
(b)Membership.The planning commission consists of seven members appointed in the manner set forth
in this subsection. Members of the commission are appointed by the council for staggered terms of
three years,expiring on March 31 of each year.
(c)Officers; meetings.The chairperson and vice chairperson of the planning commission are appointed
by the commission from among its membership for the term of one year. The commission shall adopt
its own bylaws with the approval of the city council. All members of the commission may vote on all
questions before the commission. No member of the commission may vote on any question in which
the member has fiduciary interest, either directly or indirectly. The commission shall determine in its
bylaws the date and time of its meetings and shall set such public hearings as are necessary and
desirable, or as required by law or this Code.
Page 1
(d)Powers and duties.The planning commission shall have the powers and duties allowed under state
law, including:
(1)To prepare a comprehensive plan for the future development of the city that is submitted to the
council for implementation and to recommend amendments of the plan to the council from time
to time as may be necessary or desirable.
(2)To initiate, direct, and review, from time to time, a study of the provisions of the zoning code and
the subdivision regulations and to report to the council its advice and recommendations with
respect thereto.
(3)To study applications and proposals for amendments to the zoning code and applications for
special permits and to advise the council of its recommendations thereon.
(4)To study preliminary plats and to advise the council of its recommendations thereof.
(5)To act in an advisory capacity to the council in all matters wherein powers are assigned to the
council by state law concerning comprehensive planning, zoning, platting, changes in streets, and
other matters of a general planning nature.
(e)Reports.The commission shall make an annual written report to the council, not later than March 31
of each calendar year, containing the commission's recommendations for the ensuing year.
(Ord. No. 363, § 5, 1-12-04)
Sec. 2-46.05. - Park and recreation commission.
(a)Creation.There is established a park and recreation commission for the city.
(b)Membership.The park and recreation commission consists of seven members appointed in the
manner set forth in this subsection. Members of the commission are appointed by the council for
staggered terms of three years expiring on March 31 of each year. Additionally, the commission may
also have one or two youth representatives who shall also be voting members. Youth representatives
shall be appointed for one-year terms.
(c)Officers; meetings.The chairperson and vice chairperson of the park and recreation commission are
appointed by the commission from among its membership for the term of one year. The commission
shall adopt its own bylaws with the approval of the city council. All members of the commission may
vote on all questions before the commission. No member of the commission may vote on any question
in which the member has fiduciary interest, either directly or indirectly. The commission shall determine
in its bylaws the date and time of its meetings and shall set such public hearings as are necessary and
desirable or as required by law or this Code.
(d)Powers and duties.The park and recreation commission shall have the following powers and duties:
(1)To hold meetings of its members, to consider such matters pertaining to parks and public
recreation programs in the city as shall be referred to the commission by the council, or as the
members of the commission themselves deem proper.
(2)To prepare a comprehensive plan for the future development of the city park and recreation
system, to be submitted to the city council for implementation, and to maintain said plan, and
recommend amendments of the plan to the city council, as may become necessary or desirable.
(3)To act in an advisory capacity to the council in all matters relating to park and recreation in the
city.
(e)Reports.The commission shall make an annual written report to the council, not later than March 31
of each calendar year, containing the commission's recommendations for the ensuing year.
(Ord. No. 363, § 6, 1-12-04; Ord. No. 582, § 1, 4-22-13)
Page 2
Sec. 2-46.07. - Board of adjustments and appeals.
Pursuant to M.S. § 462.354, a board of adjustments and appeals is hereby established. The planning
commission shall serve as the board of adjustments and appeals.
(Ord. No. 363, § 7, 1-12-04)
Sec. 2-46.09. - Environmental commission.
(a)Commission established.The environmental commission is established to provide the residents of
Chanhassen with opportunities to improve the quality of their environment, address issues that affect
the city's natural resources, provide environmental education to the public, bring a comprehensive
perspective to environmental issues, and advocate the benefits and necessity of Chanhassen's natural
resources.
(b)Membership.The environmental commission consists of seven members appointed in the manner set
forth in this subsection. Members of the commission are appointed by the council for staggered terms
of three years expiring on March 31 of each year.
(c)Officers; meetings.The chairperson and vice chairperson of the environmental commission are
appointed by the commission from among its membership for the term of one year. The commission
shall adopt its own bylaws with the approvalof the city council. All members of the commission may
vote on all questions before the commission. No member of the commission may vote on any question
in which the member has fiduciary interest, either directly or indirectly. The commission shall determine
in its bylaws the date and time of its meetings and shall set such public hearings as are necessary and
desirable or as required by law or this Code.
(d)Powers and duties.The environmental commission has the following powers and duties:
(1)The environmental commission shall serve as an advisory body to the city council and planning
commission in addressing the needs of the environment as directed by the city council. All final
decisions are to be made by the city council.
(2)The environmental commission will consider and make recommendations at the direction of the
city council regarding environmental issues.
(3)The environmental commission will make recommendations at the direction of the city council
regarding funding for environmental projects.
(4)The environmental commission may propose studies to the city council and make
recommendations according to the results.
(5)The environmental commission will coordinate services with other governmental and private
agencies for related issues.
(e)Reports.The environmental commission shall make an annual written report to the council, not later
than March 31 of each calendar year, containing the commission's recommendations for the ensuing
year.
(Ord. No. 363, § 8, 1-12-04)
Sec. 2-46.11. - Senior commission.
(a)Commission established.The senior commission serves as an advisory body to the city council in
addressing the special needs of people over age 55 living in Chanhassen. They consider and make
recommendations to the city council regarding the special needs of seniors in the areas of
transportation, information and assistance, independent living in the home, social and recreational
Page 3
programs, senior center and senior housing, but are not limited to these issues. All final decisions are
made by the city council.
(b)Membership.The senior commission consists of seven or eight members appointed in the manner set
forth in this subsection. Members of the commission are appointed by the council for staggered terms
of three years, expiring on March31 of each year.
(c)Officers; meetings.The chairperson and vice chairperson of the senior commission are appointed by
the commission from among its membership for the term of one year. The commission shall adopt its
own bylaws with the approval of the city council. All members of the commission may vote on all
questions before the commission. No member of the commission may vote on any question in which
the member has fiduciary interest, either directly or indirectly. The commission shall determine in its
bylaws the date and time of its meetings and shall set such public hearings as are necessary and
desirable or as required by law or this Code.
(d)Powers and duties.The senior commission shall have the following powers and duties:
(1)They make recommendations to the city council regarding funding for special services to be
provided for citizens over age 55.
(2)They may propose needs studies for this age group where necessary and make
recommendations to the city council based on the results.
(3)They coordinate services with other governments and private agencies for this age group.
(e)Reports.The commission shall make an annual written report to the council, not later than the last day
of March of each calendar year, containing the commission's recommendations for the ensuing year.
(Ord. No. 363, § 9, 1-12-04; Ord. No. 581, § 1, 4-8-13)
Sec. 2-46.15. - Resignations and removal from commissions.
Commissioners may resign voluntarily or may be removed from office by a majority vote of the city
council. Vacancies on any advisory board or commission shall be filled by appointment with a majority vote
of the city council. Vacancies shall be announced in the city's official newspaper and posted within city hall.
Applications shall be available at the city clerk's office and shall be forwarded to the city council within the
time prescribed.
(Ord. No. 363, § 10, 1-12-04)
Sec. 2-46.17. - Compensation.
Commissioners shall serve without compensation.
(Ord. No. 363, § 11, 1-12-04)
Secs. 2-47—2-55. - Reserved.
\[5\]
DIVISION 2. - HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Footnotes:
--- (5) ---
Page 4
State Law reference—Creation of city housing and redevelopment authority, M.S. § 469.003.
Sec. 2-56. - Authority to adopt housing plan, issue bonds, etc.
The city economic development authority is authorized to exercise on behalf of the city all of the powers
conferred by M.S. §§ 462C.01 to 462C.08, including without limitation, the power to adopt a housing plan
and program and to issue and sell mortgage revenue bonds for single family housing.
(Ord. No. 75, 11-7-83; Ord. No. 363, § 12, 1-12-04)
Secs. 2-57—2-65. - Reserved.
\[6\]
DIVISION 3. - RESERVED
Footnotes:
--- (6) ---
Editor's note—Ord. No. 363, § 13, adopted Jan. 12, 2004, repealed Div. 3, which pertained to the public
safety commissions and derived from Ord. No. 70-B, §§ 1.01, 3.02, 4.02, 5.01, and 6.01, adopted Oct. 1,
1984; Ord. No. 166, §§ 1 and 2, adopted Apr. 27, 1992; Ord. No. 268, § 1, adopted May 12, 1997; and
Ord. No. 298, § 2, adopted Feb. 14, 2000.
Secs. 2-66—2-71. - Reserved.
Page 5
INTERVIEW SCORING SHEET
5=High/1=Low
Name Years Lived in Knowledge Commitment Knowledge of Involvement in Total
Chanhassenof Community to Position Major Issues CommunityPoints
Doug Reeder (PC & PRC)
John Kunitz(PC)
Bill Chappell (EC incumbent)
Mike Schachterle (SC)
Ross Reeves (EC & PRC)
Matt Kutz (PRC)
2019 Commissions Interview Schedule
FIRST MEETINGS IN APRIL:
Planning Commission - April 2, 2018
Environmental Commission - April 10, 2019
Senior Commission - April 18, 2019
Park & Rec Commission - April 23, 2019
City Council InterviewsEnvironmental Commission Interviews - February 13
February 25 (Monday):6:00Brian Smith (PRC 2nd Choice)
8:00Bhakti Modi (SC)6:15Ross Reeves (PRC 2nd Choice)
8:15Alice "Lisa" Lyon (SC)6:30
8:306:45Andrew Allen-NO SHOW
8:45Gerald Cook (PC)7:00Jeff Harken
9:00Laura Skistad (PC & PRC)
9:15 Planning Commission Interviews - February 19
9:30Andrew Aller (PC incumbent-coming from airport may be earlier)1stAntonio J. Fricano (SC 2nd Choice)
2ndBala Chintaginjala-NO SHOW WITHDRAWN
February 26 (Tuesday): 3rdDouglas Reeder (PRC 2nd Choice)
5:00Sandy Sweetser (PRC)4thGerald Cook
5:15Bill Hickey (PRC)5thLynn Pelto WITHDRAWN
Annette Stock-Lind
5:30Natalia Sander (PC-NO SHOW AT PC INTERVIEW) WITHDRAWN 6th
5:45Laurie Susla (PC)7thNatalia Sander-NO SHOW
6:00Jeff Harken (EC)8thJohn Kunitz
6:15Lynn Pelto (PC) WITHDRAW 9thLaurie Susla
6:30Steve Weick (PC incumbent)10thLaura Skistad (PRC 2nd Choice)
6:45Annette Stock Lind (PC)
7:00BREAKSenior Commission Interviews - February 21
7:15Rick Echternacht (PRC incumbent)4:10Ruth Lunde
7:30Cole Kelly (PRC incumbent)4:30Jim Camarata
7:45Haley Pemrick (PRC)4:50Alice "Lisa" Lyon
8:00Drew Allen (EC-NO SHOW AT EC INTERVIEW)5:10Bhakti Modi
8:15Brian Smith (EC & PRC)5:30Mike Schachterle
8:30Antonio Fricano (PC & SC)5:50Antonio Fricano (PC 1st Choice)
8:45Ruth Lunde (SC)
9:00Jim Camarata (SC)Park & Rec Commission Interviews - February 26
5:45Bill Hickey
March 11 6:00Laura Skistad
4:30Doug Reeder (PC & PRC)6:15Sandy Sweetser
4:45John Kunitz (PC)6:30Doug Reeder
5:00Bill Chappell (EC incumbent)6:45Ross Reeves
5:15Mike Schachterle (SC)7:00Brian Smith
5:30Ross Reeves (EC & PRC)7:15Haley Pemrick
5:45Matt Kutz (PRC-OUT OF COUNTRY FOR PRC INTERVIEW)
6:00Discuss Commission Appointments
Incumbents
All commission appointments will take place at the March 11, 2019 City Council Meeting
2018 Planning Commission Attendance Record
Percentage
of
July 3
May 1
June 5
April 3
July 17
May 15
June 19
April 17
Attendance
March 6
August 7
Otober 2
January 2
March 20
August 21
January 16February 6
October 16
February 20
December 4
November 6
September 4
November 20
September 18
Andrew Aller
1111111111111193%
4/10 - 4/19
Mark Undestad
0000110111001147%
4/5 - 4/20
Steven Weick
1010111110110167%
4/13 - 4/19
John Tietz
1111111101011180%
4/15 - 4/20
Mark Randall
1101101111111180%
6/16 - 4/21
Michael McGonagill
1110011101047%
4/18 - 4/21
Nancy Madsen
1111111111111193%
4/15 - 4/19
Total Attended54040050076506606556060
Number of meetings to
15
date:
red means no meeting
PARK & RECREATIONCOMMISSION APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION – 2019
Terms Expiring:
Cole Kelly (Reapplied)
COMMISSIONCOUNCIL
Rick Echternacht (Reapplied)
RANK RANK
Steve Scharfenburg (Resigning with one year left in his term)
Grant Schaeferle (Youth Representative-no longer eligible)
Cole Kelly, 1556 Bluebill Trail1
Rick Echternacht, 8746 Flamingo Drive 2
Sandy Sweetser, 9132 Springfield Drive 3
Applicants
Haley Pemrick,7608 Erie Avenue4
Bill Hickey, 6301 Elm Tree Avenue---
Matt Kutz, 1080 Lyman Court---
Brian Smith, 7610 Great Plains Blvd. Apt. 201
5
st
(EC 1 choice)
Ross Reeves, 8471 Swan Court
---
st
(EC 1 choice)
Alternate
Douglas Reeder, 590 Broken Arrow Road
---
st
Applicants
(PC 1choice)
Laura Skistad, 2284 Stone Creek Lane West
---
st
(PC 1choice)
Natalia Sander, 6671 Amberwood Lane (WITHDRAWN) ---
Youth
None ---
Applicants
First
Ranked by:
April 23
Meeting
Steve Scharfenberg, Meredith Petouvis, and Karl Tsuchiya,
in April
Vacancies Two3-Year Terms/ One 1-Year Terms
1.
3-Year Terms (2)
2.
1-Year Term
1.
(1)
g:\\commission\\2019\\park & recreation commission matrix.docx
ENVIRONMENTALCOMMISSION APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
ENVIRONMENTALCOMMISSION – 2019
Terms Expiring:
COMMISSION COUNCIL
Bill Chappell (Reapplied)
RANK RANK
Wayne Benbow
Bill Chappell, 8736 Stonefield Lane (Incumbent)1
Jeff Harken, 7020 Derby Drive 2
Brian Smith 3
Applicants
Ross Reeves 4
Drew Allen5
Alternate
None---
Applicants
Ranked by: Environmental Commissioners Keith Butcher, Don Vasatka,
First
April 10 Greg Hawks, Wayne Benbow, and Kristin Fulkerson. Rachel Popken was
Meeting
absent.
in April
Vacancies Two3-Year Terms
1.
3-Year Terms (2)
2.
g:\\commission\\2019\\environmental commission matrix.docx
SENIORCOMMISSION APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
SENIOR COMMISSION – 2019
Terms Expiring:
COMMISSION COUNCIL
Jackie Engel
RANK RANK
Cheryl Ayotte
Jim Camarata, 6340 Oxbow Bend1
Ruth Lunde, 6721 Hopi Road3
Alice “Lisa” Lyon, 889 Kimberly Lane4
Applicants
Bhakti Modi, 8663 Flamingo Drive 5
Mike Schachterle, 2852 Century Trail 6
Antonio Fricano, 980 Lake Lucy Road
Alternate
2
st
(PC 1choice)
Applicants
Ranked by: Senior Commissioners Barbara Nevin, Jerry Cerchia, and
First
April 18 Mack Titus. Commissioners Dorina Tipton and Carol Buesgens were
Meeting
absent.
in April
Vacancies Three 3-Year Terms
1.
3-Year Terms
2.
(3)
3.
NOTE: The Senior Commission has the option to appoint a total of 7 or 8 commissioners
per Section 2.46-11 (b) of the City Code.
g:\\commission\\2019\\senior commission matrix.docx
2018-2019SENIOR COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE RECORD
AprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDecJanFebMarPercent of
Commissioner
201815201620191521182115Meetings Attended
Dorina A. Tipton XX X XXXX 100%
Cheryl AyotteXXXAXXA71%
Carol BuesgensXXXXXXA85%
Barbara NevinXX X XXXX 100%
Mack TitusXX X AXXX 85%
NO MEETINGNO MEETINGNO MEETINGNO MEETING
Jackie Engel XX X XXXX 100%
Jerry Cerchia XX X XXXX 100%
\\\\cfs5\\cfs5\\shared_data\\plan\\sj\\sc\\attendance\\2018.docx
Potential Property Acquisition
ta
ewash
Minn
rk
hts Pa
Heig
S
t
a
t
e
H
w
y
7
A
d
a
r
o
Town Line Road
b
7R
y
w
H
o
te
W. 62nd Sta
.ta
S
t.k
W.62ndS
s
ane
Lilac L
7
Hwy a Lilac Lanee
ate llyLan
St Ho
Ch
d
C
S Sta
te Hw vC
a y 7 Circle
W de
a
tadec
s
r e aa
ra scPC
C
asa
rb cs
taes
B s
wa
wh C
yr d
e t
n ra e
ba a n
L
ap
y
ey B Ca
r
r n
ao
y rs
y
b Cto tu
r e e
t
yw
C rl
at
r e
L eL
iKoehne ly
n Circle East l
R v r uR
a L r o
H
a cDriv o
he A
nto
u
n o
le
m g
ta
eer e Christmas
e a
l d n
Dk
re
d er
n
o
iaa
Le
vrd i
a i
l
c r R K
ro
e
Ov Nh
ta Cir E
OShas
a
O
BN
W
RKoehnen Circle WestA
W
En t
Hummingbird Road onr
ad Hi
lin dm
R ieC
s IPC
alP
e
lie t
hd Lra
mLanoa kouat
DeTr C
t ns
dro er
Cr as
ti Lpa
FaR e
H1 aLh
ah r ke ic
Lake Virginia ca A w La nS
tor s
s
ha LC
O Naa
r LP
kym wa
GC Ed
ue oTs
r lnrapper
s nl
ri ie
a eH
ie d
war W
re o
rr)
t
ahSoms
c 7 mer Gs a w
eaterC
C
e
M C
o
he
euo Ty
B
P
e y oRon
y OHW 932.77
R
a ev
oY Ta1
nRrl
iaMo
d av r
L w dra
e s
C ea0
ood Lane o
Pipew e
Jbd s
ove
w d 1
et g
H r c Cir
oi mpi
nhu Oly
L
aiv dn
os i
ie(i
a ae
e wdC nt
d
t erAu na
Re
lL s
ivlu u
s r
wpe wtG
a.so
Ai r
aDr Oe
ssDtR iM
t rirBA urtMu
lek Ashton Coa
orl
Me Vor
tc
v
ee xee
.PC
e g
dM
r bc
e id
a
gsen1
lR
e o
et
l
a7 tt
dlWest 63rd St
ws
OHW 929.8 o P
ey sa
nWest
1 n63rd St)
od gC
i Sta
a Sel
Ba
oye
o Hp
T uorn
R pB
n i
H)m
F n
i Lanea
el r
W7 l
i Pleasant View RoadCs
l mv
r
nlo
Mi da
1 d
l is
ina B
ina t
esht1 t
waMCP
L l
Ce
a y l
h Clasen
.
v
ry R
e i
r
a Bid
T cd
d re
s t
tg
r.a ol
on
ee
l n
D
ieMelody Hill C
C
MelodyHillr earMoun
WeNta
(vino
di
v o
nM aB
heasanu
ea PtyCl
e CMountain Wayv
.r
veS d
ri t
D iw
re r
nhoM
Sd
eo
i
e h
avl t
o w
S
l
hd
Murray Hill Crt P
oy td
L x
r
e o
T Bn
F
D
e
tr
PiadH e
rve
d
d
sB
u Herman e en
na Lak ne
i TetonLa
oi B
o b
P d
l Oxbow
e o
ol
C
ol lw
w
i
ge P
sR
n
T
wa PPlea
isant
veLC omView
ol lRoa
enbd Road
l bPleasant View
ee
e ax
rgi
nr Tsr
id O
i a
s e
Rr k
p
CD catH
iH r
B id
uo
lR
FieldPark VPleasantView
s Ciewi
r DCRoad
l
P
tgy l
n
i
n r
o d
i
a a
an
dL o
nR
nik i
PBj
anc
o
LPar o
Piptridge Cu i
ewoodC 7 ir no
W rR
e
ut t
aen
a
y e ia
l
L
k hd td
n
e
M
r a o
i
L
n
t r
o
eWc
vo
ou
idD D
r
eW
k
P a
Curry
r
v
y
F
a
s r
o
a D
a
e
t
t xno
n t
e
ra
t65thStreete
Wes i P
S
o
o h
n
kD P
da
o x
FarmsPark
s L s
r r
Ki nao
Cvw a
oe tI
a onF
h
i
d
e
eiy
t a
C
e D r n
g
d
i r
s H
R
il
t
a r
T i
ulFG
e
it ol
hB C
Pheasant R
W
x
o
odtHunters
ll
l For
wDrivewDrive
Wllo
v o
uourt
CH
Nez
hP
eo
Di
t d
fxt
oe
eyTfC
veo
nC i
e e u
M CerlF
P n
Li
Ll ieurtD(o
i ie rStrattonCotD
p n B
dir r
s C
e ne
elw
w nw r
Crestvie r
C i
aenF
i o
r ov
c hl
l.
e CresLdoGl
dtviW
ews R
Dr
x
lo
ner
Ce
w
H
i L. H
roCy
v d
a
Hill Lo
k d 1 aCx
Cr R
est tiF
view
De hrl
r eelo
mo
D 7 cl
L Pi
hPw
ddolaloF
ac
P u cex
)H
e
c S
D
i
y
VinelandCnr
ou
i
rv
L t
atae
i
u
a
a
d
n
F
o
C
e xn
d North
y I
P
aG
Park ta
h
o
e
.
u
R
t
P
s r
aG
r ray
lw
t e
Ci
ne
CharingiFox
a
V
d
C
Curv
u t
CRoad a
cy Bend
u n
L
na
e
La s
dkke o
Luc
Ly R
aoad
)
L t
Vs
N r
r e
lu
7 i
eos
D
C
Foxtail
Lak wPi
1e Luc
wty Roa n
d Lotus
s
1 g
r
R
.
i o
)
h a
P
R d
eC
d
r.
e r
vsmn
ti
rvE.
LM
ie
C t
wb
ed
ue(
Den v
g
sra
a e
Cr
L.p
le
w v
e iLake (
Crestview Drd Lucy Ro
poow adQ
ed
u
i
v
B er
lo
D v r
D
eLl r
Co yr Lake
r r
M
d c
t
e
eB
D
u
sn
sL
lo
n yL
r aNGraF
i nby
d eNaGrey
p
i ee
ea
o D
vp kFox
e ker
av
el
i
l Lze
e awurv
Maple Cir rC
r
ena Hr
r
n P
dC
oD
a e
l eev
e a D
G p
C rn
D e
vtCr
ru i L
iv c
e n
MrRC
r iiDee
e
lo
t d
Doc ekih
De
s
l
Pna
e
yw Park
e Lake rr
s
Glendale D ir
rive
avah
Wwo
T
e
Ma sH
h
w
s
o
P
e
uu
k
Shenandt
oahMr
l
a
boo
L
Hi Western Drive
dghg L
ate LH
a Ci
ar
r
k
y
ale DriveR
Glend y
y
c
L
a
w L
C
e
t
c r
k
ce
v
aL
lr
eu
u Park
w L
u d
C
d
c a
k
y
Eo
e
r
o
t
R o
Hiawatha DrR
a
o h
er
a Carv
R e
es
d
P
e
o
Country Oaks Drive li
s
V
t
S
k
Minnewashta
a o
Lake
C
Lak arver
eLu CH
cyR
oad
e
h
.t
a t a
y
e
e
r
P
B ch
tC HCarverBeachRoad ea Bea
ch
Carv
er Beach
o Road
n
d
Ca
v
D
w e
u
r
n o
r
o
o e
e P
layground
e
c
D
v a
Cwr l
i
P
r
ris
y
HCa r
ae r
C
lla e
g
rDim
e M
hrB
n
r h
St
Ltratfoge o k
ardRidr Par
co
n a
l
eB
Halv
lgren C d nn p
t
u d
r
d d
ad a
R
oY
Cree Drive
v ou r
feCree Drive
l b
e u
t yy r
M
h (n
n ae
L m
B
a aaC
a
l
r gn
L
ie
ta
Lr
y R
.
i
Regional H u R a
S bd cD
i
ynC
n
Stratford LnR
g g
r
.
ieC
eio
l
ie tv
a
r g 1
T dieDh
er
Higov e
h e
m
7 war
ni
C
n iv
a e
Uc
e)Pre
Pr
ln
a
t
n u
tgImperial Dra
k c
L
r
r
ee taw
i
m
e
e Ci
a n
r t
c
Lane ta
White Oak Minnewash C
r r
i
i Tar
c
le
)C
p c
i
o
t
7Tp u
n rP
r
t
E
1 mU
ea
C re
S aln
dLa
a
1 z
i
z
.
c
lD N
eR rive
derosa D
a Pon
.rive
erosa D
r Pond
o
a
C
(
r
e
r
.
s N
d
s Park o Lo
etu
s T
arail
v
nv
l
R
aa
a
B
j
a
L
Nd o
Lane
RedOakO Lake
vn
t
i
i D
r
Lone Eagle Dr
r
y
p r
l
u
C Lotus
tD
a
R
r
Roundho
use
G
e
OHW 944.5
u
r
v
N
o r
e e
H D
z
w
o
Pr
i r
C ToA
g pa
Park o z Dn
rive
e
rk
hh
cro
eB
go C
i t
v
Kerb
H n er Blvd
a
r
ison L
W Harr Woodhill Dr
Ker
aber
B
y
l
v
d
r h
Kings Road
Kings Road(County Park)s
D S
t
m
nr r
D
l
ul
Ri
La H
x
o
e
F
d
k
M T
eyH
do
no
e
va
ik
S
s n
o
eW R
g
y
re htod
993.6 an
OHW y rSH
L
gC
n o
h id
ao
Cs g
o nn
i
lC
n ae K
w
l
d
ig
e
e
L R
a
a
N e r
M d
r
b
n
Preakness Lane
a
Preakne
a e
s
l
Lake Lucy
L r
L
L
ia
a
n
n
a
e
k a
L
e
c
n
i
B
tL igWBlvd
oods
i C
Rn
e s n
d
C B
Ue
eeR
o eh
d
a
n l
e
r n
v a
C
a
y
t
o
d L
v r L
e
ir
Hickory Rd n
C e
C OHW 9
t 56.1 S
s n
H eo
aa
c
i
d c nlte
e h mo
g ille
i H o w
rrisonk
HaP
C v ev
i
s H aa
Lake eT Py
onr
w nti
d r rta
ChcD
HD
D
a
e rh L
Sa
a
n
i L
e
c C
r ao
i nr
R ti
k ero
l bukC
e nry
o Circle
do
a
C
r
N
e
y
m
d
a e
Jdn
r La
R
cy
P ntia
uePo
o
b
o
i
n nRr
e ood
ta reenw
v G
e Ri
o i r
J
St p dD
o
a D
s
e P
d e r
Lc
onga
o
rrive
D
A
tn
Arrow-
a L
r i
v edCed t
Rar a
Po
in n
tt rn
e R oBigho
c
on
a head i
d lmo
n
et
C
u B
u
Ct G
Park i
Shores
ner
a
eLCheyenne
cC
a
e ticc
U
v a
iti
t
r nC
c
o
n
D d
Pl
e
L
o
w
)
e
g
dr Meadow
n
i7 i
c k
a
1
a u
ee
1 B
v
iP
d
rh.
e
n
Da
v
i
roR
er
o
.
a
D
d c
r
eo
C
a
o
(
C
r
p
C
h.
tAT
e
c
u Gunflint dt
ia
Pont
oH Green i
t
ve
S r
i
Crt d C l
n Rx r
eo
i dF
n
oBT
r
f a
eil
iLw
n
n
Di WillowVie
ad
w
rn
sBigho
u C
p
ev
rl
l
c
v
G
aa
OHW
g
B
nG o
o
w
Park
L
d
e a
iv
r o
D
s
re R
riMapleSo
edl
kHi
e t
2
a 945.a
r
i i
L
dlB
ut
teT
l
urt
sCo
P
s
r
lP
e e
s
S
Conea v
stog
r
Ci
Loe
u u
o
o
K
r T
n
na w
i
gt n
t
Ta
nad
ooneC
a Drae
iveo
Cu M
1
er
ct
d
a
v
r
i
rDd p
ey
D
e
sa
e
r
cBrH
u
an L
gS ae w
t n
n
o
DL
r
r
H
in
vD
eg
T
t
r
dr
i
vo
Bl
Ri
Let
a Lake
tr
ae
es
gT
k
ed
rir
rook
bs
eTe
wlr
a
d
dil
a e
S
y r v
i
d
Tr
r
i
Lake e
ai
r D
c
C
S
l
Re
l
l
l o
i
d
H
H
L e
u r
a
kn
a
Basswood Cir
t
e
e
L
rD
rtrive7
idr
d
RCa
gM
W
F
o
e c
FrontierTr
c ailu
s
aS
r
t s
wv
Tanado i
ona Drive n
R
a
T e
r.
o l
d
d
o
Ann
d
R
(
l
D
l.e
i w a
r
d
i
h
Hawthorne Cir
r
v t
L
et
l k
o
u
n
)e r
g i
nR
s Bs
r a
o
cc Cuk g
d Mo
a
i d
W P v
n
e T
s
i i
t
R we
r
o ay
i o W
d p Cactusw
ca Highland Drive
Bi
D lt Highland Drive
es OHW 955.5
t r aj
M
i
C
n urve l
a
OHW 896.3
l
C
n
K
G
i
e r
nv
r
c
u
F
B
C l
o
a e
H o
l
n
w
Ht
rk
i
llC
a
o
e
h
ugarbus
S
v
Fo
i
d
r
7 r
7b
T D
r F
i
s
ti
inhe r
Dl
D o
ri
ve
C
S n
im
d aircle
drronC
oW
tL et
i
B r
e
ia
g Park
a L
ot r
r
i
rS
wtn
r
T
7d
7C
ths
Seo
t r
C a
m
u
op
n i
C l
Ci
c
g
d i li
o
l
o o
l
e t u
tq
r
R
D
dT a
g
t
C r
dr Chippewa Ciru
d a
i
t o
i s
iv
rBrinker S SC
treet
r
e
e
i
R
C t
n
t o
r
a e
Del Rio DriveF
s
o n
L
a
ra
re
a
e id
r oL
gL
a
oh C
F n
C o
e
S t
t R
W a
o
r
ad
n
S
lae
S
vir
ar
y
t
io
eaa
g
o
ra
wL Dell Road
Highwood Dr
n T
r
Pve
o
l
r
on Cu i
Cany
i
n l
r
tCurve
aln
Wu
t
C
u
R rve
aDrive
er
V
i
e
l da
i
na
Tr a
tury g
r
aw
d t
n
ee
ae
te
Si
v
t
p
Ci
i
. rn
e
p
te
yi
we
r
Fr
Ch
u
W tF
W
F
.C
s
n
7 a
n
8 ea e ta
Lak n
t
Le t
i
Cyn
h
n
.go
i
l d a a
e
la
aS
i
l S
v Su
lya
lS
i l
VDen P
n
r a
t
i a
V B
Fee
r Trail
ota Vrt
Minnes m P
ArboretumV s
illW eu
ageh rmot
C y
u t
arourC
rct rC A
t ernr
v e t
e
ma v e
C v
e gu
Tilo e
o o r
ru r t
t tC
te rLr
ley oS
Ci l
o r ul
C l
e n ti
h
D
brv e H
V
eF
r G
o b
ee
A
h DellRoad
b Cr
v
u cg w i
r t S
t
anr
ei h
et
Lo
A r o
Dr a
K eD
o C
P
B tA
u
b
eO
r
rl
scape eR
Land v i Q
C r
mL
tI
A
e
SA
v
Villar n lR
ge Cirril
li
t orN
P
u H
W R
r 76th
h y s Ann St
DE
c Cirn1
aeDT
V
o B d y aS
l
C n rrE
e v r rt
b P
li
e erW
r v
re o
y l&
a West V
Village Roadue
W h
S
st
t
saC oE
a H I
sly IS
y Way l
rEe e trT
W eberBaneberryI
e Ban K C
m oe
niC
n
i
y
err WaEqN
a
nE tus I
Village Crt A S Lo
rbo
et Su Blvd o
uml W
d oretum Vi
Arb SoT
hS
oout
S
H
aea Bl
a vi
i
s
r
u
n
o e a a a
n
A
l rr
ru
elo
a w o w
oCvTh
R flhicor k
T neyWay ic t
oB N n
l Co
e
iW i
u
r
y
K
o
7s
a8
l
a S
it
e ch
n l
a e
Lak
L m
BS d
elv n
g u
a t B
llV t t
i e e
V Arr 77thSt.
bor n a77th St.
B Park
o
iPoppy Dr
n
e
le
uLu
l t l
V
aB
a
t d
s t
igdCW 77th St
C S
le
rim
ly r
l
ae
irr
p a
tcr
g p
u
Se
e
ei
pt
r
t
Bln
Pue S rk
age Pa
LN n
E
o
ee
lgr
a
S
ue W
Blu
F
W
Nn
L
W 8
T e
d
H
7 v
n
1
8 r V a
i
T Watere
leafwA
H h
t 0
k
Park o
e
tr
e e 1
et LanE
e Chan View
5
HwyArb rleaf R
eor Wate
tate
Stu
m
SmBoule Y
taoretuvard l
teArb
Hwy5 W
Lane l
m
r
t Chan View e
e
D
o
b H
8TS
W7tre W
r et
bor e
Aretu 7
m 8i
A 5B t e
ou h
l r
ev S
wa t
t
d
E
e
t
a
v t
t
S
l
S W
tat S
e H
w
y 5
A
B rbo
re
tum
B
o
ule
va
rd
78thSt.
y W
7
r 8
t
eh
t
e
ne
tr
u S
a
t
e
t(W78thSt)
n
State Hwy 5 Arboretum Boulevard
W 78th St
e g
Lr
5
a o.
N
y
w
CH
T
tstWa
Harve
y
e
s
a
t
e
S
v
v
A
Place
Corporate
e
a
g
P
Chanhassen
d
a
ParDell Road
Srk Cou
rt
k
D
t
A
m M
o O
D
d R
L
I
tA
n
v R
a
u r
McGlynnDrive l N
R
ei
E
AT
v
S
Recreation k E
W
e
&
r
S Lake Drive East
E
rBou I
el
lte T
re I
uv C
oa
eha N
ric I
dP
b
W
T
r
e
e
KB
t
D
S t
Center t
l9
W7 s
rv
d
n
t
d East
mC ve Drive
Lak
u
t l
E
ue
Ag
a
d B
i r
k
e Lake Drive East
R e
t
S
t hassen
se Chan
A
v
u A
n
H
i
u e
i
r
m
a
E
i l
n
D
g
y
R
C
P
P
i o
d aDell Road
u r
h g k 5
e l RC
W t the
e oy
ates
r ae Est
d
n
rB
wC A an
oua
ltevlvd
rBoule y
d
.lvd.
Coulter B r e
Co
ulter
Bouu b r a
aleva D
rd
v
o
Ga
y
A
r
M
e
t rk
4 Pa
u
k
m
1
P
t
B
Andr A
W e
C
E
a o
r o l
e u vv
r ky
T t
o u r
w de
e
rPlace 7h
i
l
eCr
P9
e u
t
hHp
S
ltS
i
a
A
c a Dakota
ed
r
d v
v e
r Cir
o e
a
v
e C
l
u
eB
y
du
m
u
v
t
e l
C
r
o
t
tb
Bs
A
a
(5
y
E
r s
ew
H e
e en
t
Dta
nv
S ia
e ir
L
D
n
a
o
l
eeD
o kda
k
a
Pdo
w i
Lt
a
rD
H
tA
v
P
e
br
a
i
m m n
tu D L
re ake
bo A De
r O riv
e A de
ap e R
sc IL rH
d a A t
an Chanhassen
L o R
ota
es w N r
n R
in R E i
M T
G
k S dE
E
r W u
o
a&
S d
P E
I or
o T
I
C
ei
IN
de
W
r T
C
n
d
e
a
C
T n A
e
om C
Pr n
i
dn
i d
rv
H
o n ie
Mr
Le
o e
o
d
P
a
w
T a
Nature t
ed
l
A
i
p w o
s
a
m H
k
M
a
e
v
i
r r
D
D
ue
ee
ry
p
k
ie
a
L SC
V
e
reserv i
P e
e
i
w
r
o
E
Driv
e
n
d
G
M
k
usan
W 82nd St ake S
L
a
D
a
l
e a
l
O
o
L
a
u
k
k wr
o
e y
o
d
U
w t
R
i
dCa
p
g
o
e
l
r
o a
t Park
n
d
r
i
D
r S
d
BM
i
n
ne
C
n
a
S
e
r
ni
r s
s
t
c
wo
h
l
e t
n
s
D
e L
e
o
iW
d r
e
l a
e d v i
i
C
Cr
rD
e
C e
e
k
k e a
k
t d
L
i
T
reC
rl
ai
x
a La
n
kte
eo
kD
la
D
p
r
o
t
o
r
M
o
eCu
rt
u a
arsh
L Rice M
B
rid Stone
l
e
C
T
kview
e Cree
E
e
s
k
Crt
Til Park
ra Lake
e
B
i Cr
d eek
l
e
b
r
rt
e e C
e
nc
sa
is
ea
en
R
C
w
i
r
Park
o
o
r
e
D
v
i
r
D
l
D
sL
a
ok
e
r f
i
f
RiceMarsh
u
D H
riv
De
S
ls
il
H
a
n
a
a
s
n
us
e
S
eeu
Cr
ek r
nH an
to us
S t e S
o
S
LkD
S Lake
n
tS
o
Wn
en e s l
CL
reekLs
e
E La
C keDriv
e k
W
a
D
n
n Lake
r
La Preserve
e
o
r
L
eR
t C
i
k t o t
v
s
S e
s
Ce
r r
w
r
e
t
e Do
E o
e d
D W
d
G A
ice
R
k D
Oo
I
R
r
Lo
I
a
A
s
Rw
t
l
l dr
N
r
p C
R u r
Eu
o
D
T
o OHW 881.8
i
Sd
B M
n C
Eo
o
u w
r ose v
D R
W
k
l s
aer
&
i
r
t t
B
S C S n
d e E Hi
I ll
ns
n B
T
o
I L
l t
8
C
nS Lake
Marsh
W
N S
I n
Ct
W
n
ec
T
r
o
W
u
He a
ron De
Sr
CourteC
Dove
tr
C cs
o
t
nrD
LDr
DSake
es
Ceknt
rerol
Herl
r
ul
t
Ci
D
R s
o
n
na
a
u
c
ois
l
.
er r
n
OHW 8
HP 77.0
1 o
Hi
M
9 lws
k 1
o
a
H
)
r
0
r
oOP
nm f
Dr a
e
e
si
v Hills
Mission
i
p l
P
n
r
t
Cr
r
e
i
o w C
Mallard
ll
d Di
C
LH
a a
kn H
Crtea r M
Sus
o
r
e D
lu s i
BT
b
r n
ils
l
a
lvd (CSAH 18)i
Lyman Be
g g
e
r s
L
e e
y il u
g l
Hs
m M
T
o
a
e d
D
a
rn
n c
E
a.L
t
a
a
Bluff ilr
s
l
i
r
n
u
v P
M
M
r e e
d i
t s l
s s
us
i
r a o
(
n
C o
e ill
s
W
rt Fri
Ds
C C
n
rw
ek
T
o
r n
o
a.
A a
P
s
i
H
lD
t
A
1
8
e
V
)nW 8
6th St
alL
a
u
CL
l a
l
Ridgey
reTraib
l
Nk
torthe
llTr
yyail
r
e
eOK
p
ls
lp
s
Vrei
n
ayS
L C
LO
aCg M
iV e
n Ric
ee
Creek u
fa
e
ri
w i
ts
s s
kc
h
a
ea Marsh
land Trl
l
D i
n
o
oSP
n
u
rs
oweassenHillsDrNorth l
P
h
W
ln
a
m B
H
h
ly
l
y
a
H
i
llHa
W
MissionW
ke
t
i
b
l
l i
Preserve
d P
t r
erv
se
C
TD
hr
ushCrt r
t
r
n
v d
M
C
e rt
a
r
ey
Van
lley
Rid
ge P
lac
ee
a
c
n
l
h
t
r
2
l 1
o
2
.
DC
N
H
.
e
ay
T
B
i
D
rh
V
r
o
Power
N
ns
l
y
o
L
L
at
la
l
l
y l
S
k
Lake Susan Drive
a
m yn
e
l
e
R
Hill
idg r R
eTs
a rail
South
D
i
n Bar
bara Cl
rt
e
y
y
h e
B
l
i
D
l
R
Park
v
r
L
d e
d
k
k
Cr
R
e
eu a
(
o
L
su
C
S
v
n
n
S
o
s
i
t
A
c
t
re
H
l
f
e
C
1
eRw
S
unridgh
t
8
ui
o
)
e
SLa
r
D
s
l
l
i
H
n
e
s
S
s
aL
a
uk
h
e
n
n
a
h
e
e
y
t
T
T
r
v nB
a
l lv
a
md r
B y
l
L
Riley
i
l
a
r
i
C
s
Chanhassen C
ehe
o s
at
r de
dr
R
fi
ki
C e
a
l
se
ds
o Ridge e
L
S
R
no
i
t
O
snc
a Hills nl
i
ue
S
L
y
o
mQ
Park
Southwest Village Dr
Su
a
L r
t
o
h
y i
v
C
u
m w
o
ue
t t
he
a
Park
s
n
W
t
B
V
e
l
v
i
d s
l
l
(t
C a
S Village
A g
H
1
8
)e
Lyman Blv
d (CSAH 18)
D
r
LymanBlvd(
CSAH18)
AH 18)
Lyman Blvd (CS
Lyman Blvd (CSAH 18)LymanBlvd(CSAH18)
River Rock Dr N
e
i
r
f
t
a
r
fiu
rD e
n l
e C
d
Cro
ssroad
Ct n
Dy
me
ri
e
l
a
e
m
l r
e
Degler LN
G
f
D
S
g
r
nv
e
r
p
S
d
e
f
r
e
v
m
l
m
ut
B
r d
S lan
ark
P
o
y
ay
C
W
e
G
l
i
r
e
River Rock Dr N R
e
e
v
Mills Drive k
e
w
e
a
Di
L
i
r
e
v
i
r
D
s
l
l l
i
M
e
i
f
e
v
i
rr
Way
y
e
l
a
e
pv
sy
n
rSun
J
D
e
g
e
r
d
C
i
r
c
R
l
e
e
Lake
n
g
L
e
N
l
a
Dee
e rfoot Tra
il
d
v
n P
e
m
b
r
o
k
e r
e
l
l a
D
S e
e
E r
f
w t
r
T
i
C
k
a
k
d
c
s
c
r
e e
s
h t
t
C
e
i
r
B
C
Bluff Creek
Riley
d
v
Foxwoods
l
Bandimere
Preserve
e
e
r
n l
L
i
n
f
Preserve
f
e ga
s
u
r
d s
i
d
r
B
i
u T
k
e ar
P
J
R
a
Bandimere
e
lw
v
g
o
R
i
o
c
k K
D
Heights
S
t
W
a
erR
sivoc S
Rk H
D
r
i Park
v
e
C
w
i
rg
t
o
n
1
G
C
n Ln
Lincol
r
n
OHW 865.3
a
m
P
en
C d
md
a
g
C
e
D
a
r
t
W
a
D
l
t
aeh
Hemlock Way
BRlvd
c
s
o
l
ha
o B
r
n
is
a
n
e
w
t
v
gi
v
o
ee
t
n
o
l
a
t
D
lD
tr
hr
r
u
o
C
l
iaLn
lumb ld
Co
o
g
i
r
a
M
d
H
e
m
t
C
l
o
s
s
c
2
a
r
Franklin k
g
n
W 1
o
t
t
d
o
Ca
2
a
y
.
o
d
va R
H
l
.
Eastwood
C
do
B
u
r
rt
T
h
k
o
f
i
n s x
e
s
r
nial Ln
Colo a o
g
P W. 96th Street
C
F
B
l
f p
f lp e
o u
l
f
M
f d
o
C
n
r
B
e
l
e
e a
n
outh L l
Plym
d
L
L
r v
l
T
d
kn
e
a
c B
e
y
a eo
W
t
s
k
c
o
l
m
e n
H
l i
Ln
oma
eed
Fr
l
o
P
H
t
d
a
a
o
e
r R
d
G
r
o
f
1
x
0
o
P
in
eF
vi
e
w
4 CF
1)1 o
H ur
t
A
S
C y
(
l
i
o
a
w
r
T
P
r
ioe
ne e
H
R
R
t
d
eo
a
E
d
l
r
a
)
4
Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14)
1
Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14)
H
A
C
(
l
r
r.
T
T
r
rxe
p
lo
e
e
n
o
B i
P
s
i
r
onee
Pi
e
l
l
i P
n
H
a
y
L
r
e
e
r
m
b
R
u
p G
ns
i
a
n
h
e
rk
s Pa 0
Pas
pr
1
l
D
s
k
e
y l
o
Brami
beo
Dr
D
a
w b
r
e
v
e
H T
e
urse
reek Golf Co
Bluff C
ek Drive
Bluff Cre
d
R
d
n
s
H
w
1
1
G
e
T
r
a
i
lllers
e
stC
l
S
n
n
d
B
l rm
se Fa
u Hes
fv
f
d
C
r
e
e
k
W
D
e
s
r
t
i
F v e
eserv
Pr
e
r
m
R
o
a
d
W
e
s
rive
kwood D
Cree
m
R
a
sseF
Ha
rm
R
d
d
a
o
R
Rd
Hesse Farm
Wm
r
e
a
s
e
tn
F
a
eF
nL
at
La
ita
ids
ero
H
mk
ea
L
R
l
W
o
a
14)
SAH d
rail (C
eer T
Pion
Pioneer
Trail (CSAH 1 s
4)
n
a
e
l
B
c
r t
l
i
u
a
e
r
C fG
f1
0
f
f C
y
u
l r
e
B
e
H
k
D
r V
o
g
i e
l
v s
b
e
r
g
e T
r
l
r
D
d
u
o
l
C
g
n
i
y
l
F
/
1
6
d
R
o
C
d
B
s
n
i
a
P
e
r
G
1
0
r
d
u
o
l
C
g
n
l
F
/
1
6
H
A
S
C
CSAH 61/Flying Cloud Dr
Rice
MN Valley
National
ry Fen
Semina
Lake
Wildlife Re
fuge
fic and
Scienti
l Area
Natura
O
HW
699
.2
A)
(SN
r
D
d
u
o
l
C
g
n
i
y
l
F
/
1
6
H
A
S
C
Raguet
Wildlife
C
r
S
D
A
d
H
u
6
o
02505001,000 l
1
C
/
F
g
l
y
n
i i
n
y
g l
F
C
/
l
1
o
6
u
d
H
D
Managemen
t
A
r
i S
v
e C
Feet
Area (WM
A)
)
0
1
.
Pictometry 2017
O
N Raguet Wildlife
.
R
.
C
n
o
t
h
g
Management
u
o
Area (WMA)
µ
01,0002,0004,0006,0008,000
Feet
Potential Property Acquisition
Taxparcel
K:\\NickLH\\Projects\\PW\\Engineering\\For Paul\\2018\\January\\PropertyAcquis\\Property Acquistion_V2.mxd
CHANHASSEN FARMERS' MARKET
¯
1 inch = 30 feet
PC DATE: January 15, 2019
CC DATE: March 11, 2019
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
REVIEW DEADLINE: February 12 April 5, 2019
CASE # 2019-01
BY:KA,EH, JS, TH
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Subdivision approval, rezoning to
PUD-R and a wetland alteration permit.
LOCATION: 7141 Galpin Boulevard
APPLICANT: U.S. Home Corporation, d/b/a Lennar
PRESENT ZONING: RR Rural Residential
2030 LAND USE PLAN: Low Density Residential 1.2 –4 units peracre
ACREAGE: Approximately 191 acres gross GROSS DENSITY: 1 unit per acre net
129 123 acres net NET DENSITY: 1.33units peracre net
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAKING:
The city’s discretion in approving or denying a Preliminary Plat is limited to whether or not the
proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning
Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. This is a
quasi-judicial decision.
The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving Rezoning’s and Planned Unit
Developments (PUD) because the city is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A
rezoning or PUD must be consistent with the city’s Comprehensive Plan.
Notice was sent to adjacent properties within 500 feet.
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting Preliminary Subdivision approval, rezoning to PUD-R and a wetland
alternation permit.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 2of 45
Map of Property
Parcel and Site Information
GIS
Parcel ID TaxpayerLand UseCurrent Zoning
Acreage
Low Density
PRN
256900030 10 Rural Residential
1.2-4 units/acre
Low Density
PRN
256900020 156.07 Rural Residential
1.2-4 units/acre
Low Density
Paisley Park
250100100
3.75 Rural Residential
Enterprises Inc.
1.2-4 units/acre
Low Density
PRN
19.74 Rural Residential
256900010
1.2-4 units/acre
Low Density
250100200 PRN
6.49 Rural Residential
1.2-4 units/acre
Deeded acres vs.
Total 191/188
GIS
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 3of 45
The surrounding land uses are included in the following table:
Subdivision Zoning Land Use Notes
South Royal OaksRSFLow Density 13 acres-33 lots
West Woods at Long Acres PUD Low Density 97 acres-115 lots
Wynsong - Shoreland DistrictPUD Low Density 9.4 acres 4 units
North Ashling MeadowsRSF Low Density 40 acres-51 units
Lake Lucy Ridge RSF Low Density 9 acres-17 units
not applicable not applicable
East Lake Ann Recreational
Undeveloped Adjacent Land
South Gorra Property
ZoningLand Use Notes
38 (25 net) acres- 50 units
Low Density
Rural Residential
34 acres –204 units
Low/Medium
Rural Residential
46 acres - 276 units
Medium Density
Rural Residential
28 acres -336 units
High Density
Rural Residential
An existing home that is on 2.62 acres at 7011 Galpin Boulevard is not included in the
subdivision.
BACKGROUND
The following meetings were held discussing the PUD/Subdivision:
Where Meeting type Date
City Council, Planning Commission and Tour of the Site June 4, 2018
Park & Recreation
City CouncilWork Session June 11, 2018
Park Commission Concept PUDJune 26, 2018
Planning Commission -Public Hearing Concept PUD July 17, 2018
City Council Concept PUD August 13, 2018
City Council Work Session December 3, 2108
Planning Commission -Public Hearing Preliminary Plat January 15, 2019
Park Commission Preliminary Plat January 22, 2019
City CouncilWork Session January 28, 2019
City Council Work Session February 11, 2019
Planning Commission Public Comment March 5, 2019 (minutes not yet
available)
City Council Preliminary Plat Scheduled for March 11, 2019
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 4of 45
A public meeting was held on a concept PUD before the Planning Commission on July 17, 2018
and with the City Council on August 13, 2018. Included in the concept review were two layouts.
One demonstrated a traditional subdivision using the RSF zoning district and the second layout
applied the PUD zoning witha cluster development.
The RSF zoning district showed a plan with 202 lots and the PUD showed a plan with 199 lots.
The City Council held an additional work session on December 3, 2018 to discuss proposed
changes for the preliminary review based on neighborhood meetings held in November.
A summary of the comments from the Concept review include:
The elimination of the through streetthe on the north end.
Reduction of eight lots.
Larger lots and deeper lots were created on the southern end (Majestic Oaks) to
accommodate stormwater and tree preservation.
Four lot sizes were introduced.
The most significant changes from the Concept PUD and the Preliminary PUD application are:
Plan modifications since initial concept review
Overall
50+ acres designated for city park.
Lot count has been reduced to 191 181 homesites down 17 lots since the concept (1.37
1.33 DU/Acre).
Stormwater ponding has been incorporated to accommodate Galpin Boulevard upgrades
and has shifted to minimize visual impact to the Longacres neighborhood and allows
anopportunity to preserve the existing guardhouse as a symbol of neighborhood
identity (condition and ability to preserve guardhouse to be further evaluated for
safety).
Perimeter buffering has been evaluated.
Monumentation and landscape detail created.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 5of 45
North end
Through-street from Galpin Boulevard to Lucy RidgeLane has been eliminated.
Buffering through preservation has been identified.
Fourteen (14) lots have been eliminated to minimize environmental impacts.
South end
Twelve (12) lots have been eliminated from the southern 1/3 of the property to reduce
density.
Lots along the southern property line have been enlarged from 55’to 75’ wide to 75 90’
wide to meet the RSF standard to accommodate standard homes rather than a Villa.
Storm sewer and emergency overflows have been identified to alleviate water issues in
adjacent neighborhood.
Back yard areas along the southern property line have been expanded allowing for the
preservation of existing trees.
Landscape buffering has been integrated into the plan.
ZONING DISTRICT
Low-density zoning options for 1.2-4 units an acre. Within the low-density land use, there are a
number of zoning applications including RSF, RLM, R-4 and PUD. The applicant’s proposal is
requesting the Low Density Residential PUD Zoning. Residential Single Family (RSF) requires
15,000 square foot lots. This zoning district would cause the most environmental impacts to the
site. In order to achieve the desire for a larger preservation area next to the lakes, the most
appropriate zoning would be either a PUD or residential-low and medium density (RLM). Both
of these districts require preservation of environmental features. It will be the city’s goal to
ensure that the request for either zoning meets the intent.
ARTICLE VIII. – PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DIVISION 1. – GENERALLY
Sec. 20-501. – Intent.
Planned Unit Developments (PUD) offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the
relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a
greater variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing, and a potential for
lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation
that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal
than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts.It will be
the applicant’s responsibility to demonstrate that the city’s expectation is to be realized as
evaluated against the following criteria.
The applicant is pursuing the PUDzoning.In their narrative,they have stated,“The use of the
PUD zoning also allows for greater specificity in the types, location and sizes of uses. The city has
the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more
sensitive proposal than would be the case with the other, more standard zoning districts. It is the
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 6of 45
applicant's responsibility to demonstrate that the city's expectations are to be realized as evaluated
by the city’s goals.”
Justification for Rezoning to PUD
Sec. 20-501. – Intent.
Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of
most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to preserve a
significant open space (100 +/- acres) next to Lake Ann Park as identified in the city’s
Comprehensive Plan. The transfer of density preserves land by dedication rather than acquisition
by the city.In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the
development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than
would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed
subdivision provides a compatible development with the surrounding development and subject to
the recommended modifications to the plan.
The proposed PUD rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City
of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan:
Enhanced preservation of Lake Ann and Lake Lucy by limited development within the
shore land district.
Reduction in total impervious surfacethrough the cluster development.
Preservation of native vegetation and habitat within the shoreland district.
Preservation of over 90% of the wetlands on the site.
Reduction of city long-term maintenance costs.
Provide connectivity (trials) to existing parks and trails.
Dedication of right-of-way along Galpin Boulevard.
The proposed amendment and rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following housing goals
of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan:
A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life-cycle.
Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line.
The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing
opportunities.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 18, Subdivisions
Chapter 20:Article VI. - Wetland Protection
Article VII. -Shoreland Management District
Article VII. - Planned Unit Development District
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 7of 45
EXISTING CONDITIONS
A bluff area to the northern off of Lake Lucy Ridge.
A portion of the site is within the Shoreland District of Lake Ann and Lake Lucy. All
lots within 1000 feet of the shoreland must have a minimum lot size of 15,000 square
feet. This standard has been meet with the lots on the end of Street “Z”and the end of
Lake Lucy Lane.
There are several wetlands on the site,the largest of which is approximately 42 acres.
The wetlands have been delineated and a Notice of Decision has been made.
SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT
The applicant is requesting subdivision of 191 acres into three outlots and 191 181 residential
lots.Access to the site is from Galpin Boulevard except for the connection to the north that
connects Topaz Drive and Lucy Ridge Lane. Street “Z”off of Galpin Boulevard is now a cul-
de-sac.
While a variance is not required for the cul-de-sac length, staff has reviewed the criteria
necessary to permit longer cul-de-sacs. The maximum length of a street terminating in a cul-de-
sac shall be 800 feet. The city manager or their designee may approve a cul-de-sac exceeding
800 feet if they determine that the following necessitates a length in excess of 800 feet.
Topography would require substantial grading and the loss of significant trees that would alter
the physical character of the property and surrounding parcels. Additionally, the 16 lots
proposed for housing accessed via this cul-de-sac are on larger lots, rather than the 26-30 homes
that would be permitted by City Code.
Site Analysis
Total Gross Area191.0456 +/- Acres
Total Development Area 51.9451 51.21 Acres
Number of Lots191 181
Number of Outlots3
Total Outlot Area122.3114 123.28 Acres
Total Right-of-Way Area 16.79 16.47 Acres
Gross Density .9474 Lots/Acre
Net Density (Excludes Wetlands & Co. Rd. 117) 1.5 1.33+/-Acres
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 8of 45
DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS
Staff is proposing that the following development standards govern the development of the
property.
Wetland Standards - Manage 1
Buffer: 30 feet
Building Setback for Buffer: 25 feet
Accessory Building setback from the Buffer: 15 feet
Proposed Lot Standards
90-Foot Lots - Shoreline Overlay Non-Riparian Lots
Width: 90 feet
Area: 15,000 sq. ft.
OHW: 75-foot setback
Bluff: 30-foot setback
Local street ROW setback: 20 feet (25 feet with sidewalk)
Corner Lot Right-of-way: 20 feet
Lot Coverage: 25%
Total Lots: 31 42
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 9of 45
75-footlots
Width:75feet
Area: 11,000 sq. ft.
Front setback: 20 feet
Rear setback: 25 feet
Side setback: 7.5 feet
Corner at ROW: 20 feet
County Road 117: 50 feet
Lot Coverage: 35%
Total Lots: 10
65-Foot Lots
Width: 65 feet
Area: 8,450 sq. ft.
Front setback: 20 or 25 feet
Rear setback: 25 feet
Side setback: 7.5 feet
Lot Coverage: 35%
Total Lots: 116 139
55-footlots
Width: 55 feet
Area: 6,000 sq. ft.
Garage setback: 25 feet; Living space: 20 feet
Rear setback: 25 feet
Side setback: 7.5 feet
Lot Coverage: 35%
Total Lots: 34
*Lots within each category may exceed the pervious surface because they are averaged with the
overall preservation area within the development.
The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following
table displays these setbacks:
GALPIN PROPERTY COMPLIANCE TABLE
Lot Lot Area Lot Width Lot Impervious
(SF) (Feet) Depth Area (SF)
(Feet)
90 foot 15,000 90 125 5,500
frontage
90 foot 11,250 90 125 5,500
frontage **
65 ft Lots 8,450 65 125 4,400
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 10of 45
Front Rear Side Yard Corner CR 117
Setback SetbackSetback Setback Setback
20 ft* 25 ft 7.5 ft 20 ft50 ft
25 ft 25 ft 7.5 ft 20 ft50 ft
Wetland Buffer Setback 20 ft.
*25 ft. with Sidewalk
**Lots 101-111
90-Foot Frontage
Lot Lot Area Lot Width Lot Impervious
(SF) (Feet) Depth Area (SF)
(Feet)
501 18,092 100177 5,500
502 17,455 90 167 5,500
503 15,030 90 167 5,500
504 22,829 90 249 5,500
505 24,572 90 249 5,500
506 16,733 90 175 5,500
507 18,427 90 201 5,500
508 17,037 90 142 5,500
509 23,848 90 159 5,500
510 20,017 90 137 5,500
511 18,801 90 156 5,500
512 17,844 90 167 5,500
513 15,032 90 167 5,500
514 15,030 90 167 5,500
515 16,667 100167 5,500
516 15,574 90 175 5,500
517 15,514 90 175 5,500
51815,482901745,500
519 15,576 90 174 5,500
520 15,300 90 170 5,500
521 15,300 90 170 5,500
522 15,300 90 170 5,500
523 15,440 90 172 5,500
524 15,882 90 168 5,500
525 16,629 90 136 5,500
526 22,359 90 140 5,500
527 27,426 90 143 5,500
528 16,764 90 160 5,500
529 15,371 90 165 5,500
530 44,983 90 165 5,500
531 47,788 90 125 5,500
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 11of 45
90-Foot Frontage
Lot Lot Area Lot Width Lot Impervious
(SF) (Feet) Depth Area (SF)
(Feet)
10119,8971351435,500
10213,371901485,500
103 13,297 90 148 5,500
104 13,297 90 148 5,500
10513,297901485,500
10613,297901485,500
107 13,297 90 148 5,500
108 13,297 90 148 5,500
109 14,599 90 148 5,500
110 14,840 90 148 5,500
111 25,529 90 148 5,500
Avg. 18,479
65-Foot Frontage
Lot Lot Area Lot Width Lot Impervious
(SF) (Feet) Depth Area (SF)
(Feet)
301 9,993 78 125 4,400
302 8,450 65 125 4,400
303 8,450 65 125 4,400
304 8,450 65 125 4,400
305 8,450 65 125 4,400
306 8,450 65 125 4,400
307 11,132 65 125 4,400
308 13,748 78 131 4,400
309 8,925 65 129 4,400
310 12,282 65 126 4,400
311 8,607 65 125 4,400
312 8,126 65 125 4,400
313 8,257 65 125 4,400
314 8,795 65 130 4,400
315 9,683 65 142 4,400
316 12,836 78 125 4,400
317 12,591 78 150 4,400
318 10,414 65 145 4,400
319 10,228 65 145 4,400
320 11,448 65 145 4,400
321 13,180 65 147 4,400
322 12,052 65 145 4,400
323 11,853 65 142 4,400
324 10,767 65 142 4,400
325 9,524 65 139 4,400
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 12of 45
326 9,135 65 132 4,400
327 8,609 65 132 4,400
328 8,609 65 132 4,400
329 10,232 65 132 4,400
330 9,750 65 125 4,400
331 9,478 65 125 4,400
332 10,900 65 125 4,400
333 16,107 78 125 4,400
334 11,215 78 136 4,400
335 10,404 65 153 4,400
336 11,607 65 167 4,400
337 10,622 65 142 4,400
338 11,545 65 133 4,400
339 14,532 65 125 4,400
340 12,761 65 125 4,400
341 13,019 65 125 4,400
342 10,858 65 125 4,400
343 10,887 65 163 4,400
344 10,502 65 152 4,400
345 9,306 65 134 4,400
346 10,263 78 125 4,400
347 10,020 78 125 4,400
348 9,385 65 135 4,400
349 10,984 65 154 4,400
350 10,228 65 126 4,400
351 8,474 65 126 4,400
352 8,474 65 125 4,400
353 8,776 65 125 4,400
354 8,864 65 125 4,400
35513,586651314,400
35614,313651304,400
357 12,790 65 132 4,400
358 12,963 65 125 4,400
359 14,449 65 145 4,400
360 11,360 65 126 4,400
361 11,011 78 125 4,400
362 10,508 65 142 4,400
363 11,458 65 145 4,400
364 13,033 65 130 4,400
365 12,790 65 130 4,400
366 12,940 65 132 4,400
367 12,790 65 130 4,400
368 9,728 65 131 4,400
369 10,036 65 140 4,400
370 10,303 78 125 4,400
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 13of 45
371 8,933 65 130 4,400
372 9,242 65 130 4,400
373 9,242 65 130 4,400
374 9,242 65 130 4,400
375 9,236 65 130 4,400
376 8,450 65 130 4,400
377 8,450 65 130 4,400
378 8,450 65 130 4,400
379 8,450 65 130 4,400
380 8,450 65 130 4,400
381 8,801 65 130 4,400
382 15,319 95 130 4,400
383 11,772 78 145 4,400
384 9,453 65 145 4,400
385 9,780 65 145 4,400
386 9,898 65 134 4,400
387 9,263 65 130 4,400
388 8,450 65 130 4,400
389 8,450 65 130 4,400
390 8,450 65 130 4,400
391 8,450 65 130 4,400
392 8,450 65 130 4,400
393 8,749 65 130 4,400
394 9,189 65 130 4,400
395 9,390 65 130 4,400
396 9,313 65 130 4,400
397 8,922 65 134 4,400
398 12,754 78 130 4,400
399 8,474 65 130 4,400
4008,450651304,400
4018,450651304,400
402 8,450 65 130 4,400
403 8,450 65 130 4,400
404 8,450 65 130 4,400
405 10,504 65 130 4,400
406 11,092 65 130 4,400
407 8,819 65 130 4,400
408 8,450 65 130 4,400
409 8,729 65 130 4,400
410 12,658 78 131 4,400
411 10,192 78 127 4,400
412 9,559 65 127 4,400
413 9,104 65 145 4,400
414 9,702 65 137 4,400
415 14,151 65 135 4,400
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 14of 45
416 9,676 65 135 4,400
417 8,779 65 130 4,400
418 8,570 65 130 4,400
419 9,103 65 136 4,400
420 9,344 65 143 4,400
421 9,170 65 143 4,400
422 10,929 78 132 4,400
423 12,265 78 142 4,400
424 9,984 65 130 4,400
425 10,465 65 130 4,400
426 11,434 65 159 4,400
427 12,108 65 170 4,400
428 12,591 65 178 4,400
429 12,589 65 178 4,400
430 12,101 65 170 4,400
431 10,764 65 130 4,400
432 9,554 65 130 4,400
433 11,046 78 128 4,400
434 12,618 65 141 4,400
435 14,656 65 212 4,400
436 14,357 65 248 4,400
437 14,285 65 248 4,400
438 13,661 65 200 4,400
439 12,931 65 134 4,400
Avg. 10,475
Design Standards
1. The permitted uses in this zoning district shall be single-family detached houses and their
accessory uses. House styles include the Lennar Lifestyle, Luxury, Landmark, Classic and Villa
home plans; similar or equivalent as approved by the Community Development Director.
2. The 31 northern lots that are adjacent to Lake Lucy Ridge and Ashling meadows maybe
developed by another entity. These lots are a part of these governing documents; the home
styles may differ but must be similar in architectural scale and quality (Exhibit A).
EASEMENTS & RIGHT-OF-WAY
There is an existing 20’ wide Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sewer and
utility easement located on the property as illustrated on the submitted preliminary plat.
Generally, the easement traverses from the northwest corner of the property to the southeast
corner of the property, bisecting the site diagonally. The applicant is proposing to impact the
easement at two locations. The first location is within the northwest corner of the site where
grading and construction of Street “Z” and Basin 200 are proposed. The second location is to the
east of Street “G” where grading is proposed behind Lots 143-144. The MCES has been
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 15of 45
supplied withthe applicant’s site plans. The applicant shall address all comments and conditions
set forth by the MCES. An agreement to construct any of the proposed improvements over the
MCES’s easement must be executed and supplied to the city for review prior to the issuance of
grading permits. Furthermore, the applicant shall supply callouts identifying the width of the
MCES easement on the plat prior to recording.
The applicant is proposing standard drainage and utility easements (D&U’s) around the majority
of the lots on the provided preliminary plat. Additional 20’ wide D&U’s have been provided
within Lots116-130 abutting Street “Z”, Lots 108-111 abutting Street “A”, and Lots 102-105
abutting Topaz Drive. These 20’ wide D&U’s are provided for stormwater collection and
conveyance systems located in backyards that fall outside the standard D&U’s. Furthermore, 30’
wide D&U’s between Lots 133-134 abutting Street “H” and Lots 116-117 abutting Street “D”
have been proposed. These additional 30’ wide D&U’s are provided for access to proposed
utilities and the north side of Basin 300. However, 30’ wide D&U’s between additional lots
throughout the development shall be provided in areas requiring access to utilities and
stormwater basins. This shall include the location of a water main connection off Street “Z” to a
stub off Ruby Lane, discussed under the “Water” section of this staff report, and between lots
abutting stormwater Basins 100, 300, and 600.
Right-of-way dedication will be required along the east side of Galpin Boulevard per Carver
County’s review and comments (see attached “Carver County Development / Access Review
Comments” letter), the Highway 117 Corridor Study, and the typical roadway sections identified
in the county’s Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Corridor Study identifies specific right-of-
way needs and the plat will be required to follow and be consistent with the preferred roadway
alternative. The right-of-way shall tie into the existing highway right-of-way north and south of
the proposed development. The preliminary and final plat proposals shall be reviewed and
approved as to form and content by the county surveyor and city. Specific right-of-way
dedications and recommended cross-section submittals are referenced in the county’s comments
under Item 5.
Currently, there exists overhead utilities within the right-of-way abutting the development on the
east side of Galpin Boulevard. The applicant will be required to underground all overhead
th
utilities from W. 78 Street to the northern property line. Underground utilities reduce the risk
of accidents, such as vehicles colliding with poles and service impacts such as storms knocking
down limbs on lines. It also improves the overall esthetics of roadway corridors and
neighborhoods, which improves and promotes livability. The undergrounding of utilities from
th
Street to the southern property line is required to maintain continuity, discourage
W.78
associated impacts with piecemealed undergrounding activities, and promote constructability.
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
The provided existing conditions survey does not call out any existing septic systems or water
wells. However, Engineering and Public Works are aware of a potential septic system near the
“guard house” on the development. The applicant shall determine, to the satisfaction of the
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 16of 45
Engineering and Public Works departments, that there are in fact, no existing septic systems
and/or wells located on the property. If found, the abandonment of all existing wells shall be in
accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health’s review and regulations, and the
abandonment of all existing septic systems shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency’s review and regulations. All required permits from the appropriate regulatory
agencies shall be obtained prior to the commencement of any abandonment(s).
There is an existing MCES sanitary and utility easement on parcels 250100400 and 257580040
that is not delineated on the existing conditions survey. The applicant shall identify the
document numbers and illustrate the extents of the easement on these parcels and resubmit the
existing conditions survey.
GRADING
The applicant is proposing to construct five stormwater basins (Basins 100, 200, 300, 400, 600)
within and around the development. Through the preliminary grading plan and grading details,
drainage from individual lots will be routed away from buildings into a series of catch basins and
reinforced concrete pipe located within drainage and utility easements in backyards. Drainage
from proposed public streets will be collected through catch basins located next to curbs and
routed to stormwater basins within and around the site. The applicant has not provided in the
narrative or on the preliminary plans details regarding whether the site will be mass graded or if
the site will be graded under a phased approach. The applicant shall supply a mass grading plan
or a phased grading plan (whichever is applicable) for review and approval by the city prior to
the issuance of grading plans.
There are proposed driveways that approach the maximum 10% grade (e.g. Lot 130 abutting
Street “Z” is at 9.9% grade) and one street that reaches the maximum 7% grade (Street “A” near
station 24+50) allowed by city ordinance. Staff recommends limiting maximum grades in order
to achieve a higher level of constructability. Any constructed street or driveway that exceeds
maximum allowable grades upon final inspection will be required to be removed and replaced.
The applicant has not supplied top of curb elevations or spot elevations at the center of proposed
driveways at curb line on the submitted grading plans. Updated grading plans shall be submitted
illustrating these elevations for review by the city to ensure constructability and any potential
conflicts.
The proposed grading to the north of Street “Z” between stations 6+50 and 11+00 is called out as
a 2:1 slope. The slope shall be reduced to 2.5:1, at a minimum, upon submittal of construction
drawings and prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Certain locations that call out the emergency overflow route (EOF) are missing the associated
drainage arrows. All locations of the EOF shall be illustrated with accompanying drainage
arrows upon resubmittal of grading plans.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 17of 45
There are two bluffs within the site. One bluff is located west of Lots 111-115 abutting Lucy
Ridge Lane and a second bluff is located south of Lots 125-126 abutting Street “Z”. The grading
plans do not indicate the locations or extent of the bluffs and their appropriate buffers and
setbacks. The extent and location of all bluffs shall be provided on the grading plans upon
submittal of construction drawings, and the grading and/or building of any structures adjacent to
bluffs shall be subject to review and approval prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Proposed grading for Basin 400 encroaches into the southern section of the city’s well house #3
and water station site off Galpin Boulevard. The applicant will be required to perform site
improvements associated with the well house site as discussed under the “Water” section of this
staff report, including the relocation of the access driveway off Galpin Boulevard. Additionally,
there is a significant oak tree that shall be protected during grading operations. The grading
plans shall show the relocated access driveway location and grades, the location and footprint of
the well house, and call out the protection of the oak tree upon resubmittal of grading plans.
There is a low point indicated on the preliminary grading plans at the intersection of Street “E”
and Street “H” that does not align with the proposed storm catch basin. The applicant shall
adjust the grading plans so that the low point is adjacent to the catch basin for optimal drainage
and to reduce ponding or “bird bathing”.
The preliminary grading plans indicate drainage of backyards from Lots 164-174 abutting Street
“A” to runoff directly onto the proposed public trail, north of Wetland 11. The applicant shall
submit revised grading plans and stormwater plans so that no stormwater runoff flows directly
onto the public trail. Furthermore, no untreated stormwater shall be routed to wetlands prior to
treatment.
Immediately east of Lot 110 abutting Street “A”, the applicant is proposing a stormwater
conveyance pipe with catch basins. The preliminary grading plans indicate a grade of
approximately 30% running perpendicular to the stormwater system. The applicant shall adjust
the grading plans to create a grade of not more than 10% over the utility for maintenance and
accessibility purposes. Furthermore, staff has concerns regarding slope stability immediately
east of Lot 110. The applicant shall submit an updated geotechnical report, including soil types,
groundwater elevations, and slope stability calculations for this area based on the proposed
structure to be constructed on the lot.
The public trail adjacent to the back lot lines of Lots 112-115 has a proposed continuous grade of
8% extending over 150’. While the proposed public trail system meets the Americans with
Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) for maximum running slope of trail
segments (no more than 30% of the total trail length to exceed a 1:12 slope), staff recommends
the installation of a level resting pad over this continuous grade. This recommendation is based
on the intent of ADAAG which is to provide access to the greatest extent possible.
The plat’s final grading plans, ponds, and right-of-way along Galpin Boulevard shall be
reviewed and approved by the county and the city to show how they conform to the potential
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 18of 45
future Galpin Boulevard reconstruction. A cross reference of grading plans, profiles, and
respective cross sections should be provided at key locations such as intersections, ponds, or
other special features for review by the county and city prior to acceptance.
RETAINING WALLS
There are three proposed retaining walls on the site. All retaining walls exceeding 4’ in height
shall be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer or landscape
architect and shall be constructed of a durable material (smooth face concrete/poured in place,
masonry/mortared, railroad ties and timber are prohibited). No such plans or details were
submitted with the plan sheets and must be provided prior to issuance of grading permits.
The retaining wall on the south side of the development behind Lots 108-111 abutting Street “A”
is approximately 420’ long and ranges from 4’-10’ tall. The retaining wall is currently proposed
to be offset approximately 10’ from a proposed stormwater conveyance line. The retaining wall
shall be adjusted to accommodate a 1.5:1 buffer from the bottom of the proposed stormwater line
to the bottom of the proposed retaining wall foundation. The 1.5:1 buffer is required for
maintenance and repair purposes and to maintain structural stability of the wall during such
activities.
The retaining wall on the west side of the development behind Lots 161-163 abutting Street “A”
is approximately 170’ long. Top of wall and bottom of wall spot elevations were not provided.
The updated grading plans shall include the top of wall and bottom of wall elevations.
The retaining wall on the north side of the development behind Lots 123-125 abutting Street “Z”
is approximately 200’ long and ranges from 6’-8’ tall. The construction of this wall appears to
be within a bluff setback. Pending updated grading plans that illustrate the bluff, addressed
previously under the “Grading” section of this staff report, the retaining wall may have to be
adjusted outside the bluff protection area.
STREETS
The applicant is proposing the construction of nine new streets (Streets “A”-“H” and Street “Z”)
and the extension of two existing streets (Topaz Drive and Lucy Ridge Lane) that shall be owned
and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. All
newly constructed street sections shall be designed to meet the current standard specifications
and detail plates for residential streets. These new streets and extensions will result in six cul-de-
sacs with five of the six proposed cul-de-sacs meeting current City Code and standard
specifications. Street “Z”, a newly constructed street and cul-de-sac in the northern section of
the development, exceeds the maximum length for a cul-de-sac per city ordinance. City
ordinance section 18.57.k limits the length of any cul-de-sac to 800’. Street “Z” is proposed as a
cul-de-sac with a length of 1376’ measured from the centerline of Galpin Boulevard to the center
point of the turnaround radius. However, Engineering recommends approval of the cul-de-sac as
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 19of 45
the topography would require substantial grading and the loss of significant trees that would alter
the physical character of the property and surrounding parcels (Ordinance 18.57.k.2).
Furthermore, public outreach efforts and public hearings were conducted by the city regarding
the option for a local through street connecting Galpin Boulevard to Lucy Ridge Lane (i.e. Street
“Z”). The responses received from residences in the Ashling Meadows neighborhood noted that
they opposed the connection. The concerns were regarding perceived increased cut-through
traffic, safety associated with an increase in traffic through residential neighborhoods, and loss of
the natural barrier between neighborhoods. The alternative to connect Galpin Boulevard with
Lucy Ridge Lane was conceptually proposed back in June of 2018 by the applicant (see exhibit
below).
Exhibit 1: Pioneer Engineering’s Concept Plan 07 from 6-1-2018
As the applicant has proposed not to extend or connect the development of the north section
through the existing stub off Ruby Lane, the developer shall remove the existing hard surface
and construct half-streetimprovements (extending curb & gutter) to maintain the continuity of
Topaz Drive. The city will reach out to the property owners abutting the removed stub to discuss
vacating the right-of-way, while maintaining utility easements over existing utilities.
Access to Street “Z” is from Galpin Boulevard, a collector road. There is an existing driveway
30 feet south of Street “Z” providing access to parcel 250100400. This spacing does not meet
MnDOT Access Management Guidelines or Carver County’s requirements for access points off
collector roads. The parcel’s access from Galpin Boulevard shall be abandoned and realigned to
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 20of 45
tie into Street “Z”. Additionally, a water stub for future connection shall be installed to serve the
property. The city has had discussions with the resident of this property and has obtained verbal
agreeance of such a realignment and future water service connection.
The applicant has supplied a geotechnical evaluation report that was completed by Braun Intertec
Corporation on June 29, 2018. The report discussed and explored design and construction
recommendations for roadway sections, amongst other topics. The report utilized eight boring
locations for the entire site. Due to the size of the development, the city will require additional
borings. In-situ soil strata and subsoil conditions over a large area, such as this development
(approximately 52 acres), requires a more comprehensive understanding of subsoil constraints
that additional borings can provide. The city will require additional borings where roadways are
to be constructed and at all cul-de-sac locations. The city will require the applicant to submit an
updated geotechnical evaluation report based on the additional borings.
Sidewalks and pedestrian access points have been proposed on a majority of the streets
throughout the development. However, Streets“D”, “G”, and “Z” will require extensions of
sidewalk to provide access within the cul-de-sacs. Sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance
with city standard specifications and detail plates. Furthermore, there are considerable stretches
of sidewalk that do not provide access points or curb ramps to the newly constructed sidewalks.
The applicant shall provide curb ramp/access points for every 500 feet of sidewalk. This will
result in three additional curb ramps/access points from the provided preliminary site plan. All
curb ramps shall be constructed to meet ADA standards and the city’s detail plates.
The sidewalk located at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and Street “E” terminates with no
proposed intersection improvements to access the existing trail system on the west side. The
developer will be required to extend connectivity by providing access from the newly
constructed east side to the existing west side of Galpin Boulevard by utilizing approved
MUTCD practices for pedestrian crosswalk and intersection improvements.
Street lights have been proposed throughout the development. No street light construction detail
or specifications were provided with the subdivision submittals. A detail of the street lights shall
be submitted and reviewed prior to the issuance of building permits. An enumerated list of all
street lights and their locations shall be submitted prior to the recording of the final plat. Street
lights will be required at all intersections and at the end of each cul-de-sac. The developer will
need to work with Xcel Energy for the installation of city-approved street lights. A $300 fee
shall be collected with the development contract for each street light for the purpose of electricity
costs for the first year of operation.
WATER MAIN & SANITARY SEWER
Water
The applicant is proposing to construct 8” PVC C900 water main throughout the development
that shall be owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 21of 45
the City Council. The development is located between two pressure zones in the city; a high
pressure zone and a low pressure zone. To the west in the Longacres neighborhood is a high-
pressure zone. To the north and south in the Ashling Meadows and Royal Oak Estates
neighborhoods, respectively, are low-pressure zones. The city has modeled the impact of the
development based on the proposed usage. It was found that in order to provide adequate
pressures and fire flows, water mains shall be tied into the high-pressure zone located on Galpin
Boulevard. This will result in some areas of the development experiencing pressures above 90
PSI. Therefore, a portion of the homes will likely require individual pressure reducing valves.
The developer will need to work with the Building Department and Public Works Utility
Department to determine which homes will require pressure-reducing valves.
In the northwest area of the development where Topaz Drive and Lucy Ridge Lane will be
extended, the developer is proposing to tie into the low-pressure water system via the existing 8”
PVC water mains. Engineering does not anticipate any extraordinary impacts to the water
system’s pressure or fire flow for the proposed 15 connections.
Street “Z” will be tied into the high zone water system via the existing 14” HDPE SDR 11 water
main off Galpin Boulevard. Street “Z” is currently proposed as a cul-de-sac and the applicant is
proposing the creation of a dead end system. Public Works will require the applicant to resubmit
plans to tie into the proposed water main on Street “Z” to the existing water main stub located off
Ruby Lane, to the north. Because Street “Z” will be within the high-pressure zone and the north
tie-in location on Ruby Lane (Ashling Meadows neighborhood) is within the low-pressure zone,
updated construction plans shall call out a gate valve to be installed where the system ties in.
This gate valve will remain closed in order to separate the two zones and will be opened by city
forces during any maintenance or repair work in order to “back feed” the system, as necessary.
The majority of the water main to be installed is within the central and southern portion of the
development (Streets “A”-“H”). The applicant is proposing to create a looped water system
which meets city best management practices for water utilities. Looped systems improve
reliability by feeding water from two directions rather than one, which subsequently allows
service to continue during an event that may otherwise cause disruption to water service. Water
main connections will be tied into the high zone water system off Galpin Boulevard via a 14”
HDPE SDR 11 pipe. The applicant shall verify the location of the connections on the
construction plans. All water main taps, connections, and required water main testing shall be
witnessed by the city. A pre-construction meeting prior to the commencement of any work shall
be scheduled by the developer’s contractor with the city. Additionally, all underground utilities
on the east side of Galpin Boulevard have not been located. For example, the city’s raw water
main that feeds the west treatment plant. This area on the east side of Galpin Boulevard is where
water and sanitary sewer will cross before entering the development. Thus, prior to the issuance
of building permits, all underground utilities in this area shall be surveyed and illustrated in the
profile sheets in order to identify any conflicts.
The applicant is proposing a “land swap” to build Lot 163 abutting Street “A” within the city’s
well house #3 property off Galpin Boulevard. This exchange of land will require the execution
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 22of 45
of an agreement to be reviewed and approved by the city prior to acceptance and recording of the
final plat. The agreement will set forth conditions for improvements to the well house #3 site in
exchange for the land required for Lot 163. The improvements will include: the relocation of
the ingress/egress driveway to well house #3 due to vertical curve and sight distance hazards,
relocation of the SCADA antenna due to the impact of Lot 163, improvements to the hard
surface area surrounding the well house which shall include a turning movements analysis to
ensure proper widths for design vehicles are adequate, and potential landscaping improvements.
Furthermore, the applicant must maintain a 50-foot setback of all structures from well house #3
in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health requirements.
From the proposed preliminary water plans, there are multiple areas where water main and
sanitary sewer mains will cross. All crossings of water and sewer utility mains are required to
have 18” of vertical separation and 10’ of horizontal separation, measured from the edge of pipe.
Additionally, where water mains cross sanitary sewer mains, the sanitary sewer shall be
constructed of C900 water main material and the sanitary sewer pipe length shall be centered
over the water main crossing.
The preliminary plans delineate areas where water main will run closely adjacent to, or under,
stormwater catch basins. This may cause a potential for freezing of the water main at these
locations due to inadequate ground cover from catch basin bottoms (sumps) to the water main.
Water mains shall be constructed at 7.5’ below grade, or insulated, and constructed in
conformance with the city’s standard specifications and detail plates. Plan and profile sheets
provided with the construction drawings of the water main shall include the location and depth of
catch basins and their sumps for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
The location of gate valves at some locations are up to 40’ away from tees. The applicant shall
cluster all valves at tees to obtain a minimum of 5’ spacing from the tee to the valves, where
feasible. Review of valve locations and other water main appurtenances shall be conducted by
Public Works and Engineering prior to the issuance of building permits.
The applicant shall ensure all fire hydrant spacing meets fire codes and are subject to the review
and approval of the Fire Department.
Sanitary Sewer
The applicant is proposing to construct 8” PVC sanitary sewer main throughout the development
that shall be owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by
the City Council. The entire sanitary sewer system will operate as a gravity system and connects
to existing sanitary sewer mains at five locations (Lucy Ridge Lane, Topaz Drive, the
intersection of Galpin Boulevard and Hunter Drive, a direct connection to the MCES sanitary
sewer trunk line on Street “Z”, and at the Majestic Way extension off Street “D” through a utility
easement).
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 23of 45
As proposed, the connection to the MCES sanitary sewer trunk line from Street “Z” and its
subsequent manhole are not within the roadway, down steep grades, and abutting Basin 200.
The applicant shall resubmit construction drawings to provide the access manhole and tie-in on
and within Street “Z”. All conditions set forth by the MCES shall be addressed by the applicant
for the required access manhole and direct connection to their trunk line, and all permits required
shall be obtained prior to the commencement of construction.
The sanitary sewer line to the south, adjacent to Lots 101-109 abutting Street “A”, are proposed
to be constructed at the minimum slope for gravity systems based on 10 States Standards (0.4%
for 8” PVC pipe). It is the recommendation of the Engineering department to increase the slope
to a minimum of 2% for a more effective cleaning velocity. This approach is feasible as the
proposed manhole depths are 12-22 feet (e.g. MH-92) from top of lid to invert-outs. Also, the
tie-in of this sewer line is to a manhole at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and Hunter Drive.
From the proposed preliminary plans, the applicant is proposing a new manhole, while city
records show an existing manhole directly adjacent to the proposed new manhole. The applicant
shall field verify this connection and its configuration prior to the submittal of construction
plans.
The preliminary plans submitted utilize a nomenclature for identifying proposed manholes that
differs from the city’s. Prior to the submittal of construction drawings, the applicant shall ensure
the city’s manhole naming conventions are incorporated within the plans. The city will provide a
list of appropriate manhole identifiers. This will ensure an efficient transition of the newly
constructed public improvements into the city’s asset management system for sanitary sewer
appurtenances.
Profile sheets for all public utilities, including sanitary sewer, shall be required for review and
approval by the city prior to issuance of building permits. Based on the provided plan sheets, the
applicant is proposing sanitary sewer that reaches a maximum depth of 26.47’ (see MH-26 in
front of Lot 172 abutting Street “A”). PVC sanitary sewer pipes that have a burial depth of 0-16
feet are required to be class SDR 35, burial depths of 16-26 feet requires class SDR 26, and
burial depths of greater than 26 feet requires class C900. The applicant shall update construction
drawings indicating sanitary sewer pipes that fall within these burial depths to have the
appropriate class of PVC. Furthermore, all inverts that have a 20-inch or greater differential
shall be supplied inside drops per city standards and be constructed per the city’s detail plate for
inside drops.
The preliminary plans show one manhole (MH-99 in front of Lot 118 abutting Street “C”)
having sewer flows in opposing directions, i.e. the east “invert out” flows to the east, and the
west “invert-out” flows to the west. The applicant shall submit construction drawings that
isolate flow directions via separate manholes and independent pipe systems.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 24of 45
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Please note that due to the need to review additional stormwater information, additional
comments will likely be provided on any resubmitted plans.
General
The applicant has delineated all wetlands on the property and agencies have approved the
boundaries and type.
1. Wetland permitting is required due to the proximity and proposed impacts to wetlands on
site. A wetland permit application has not yet been received by the City from the
applicant. Grading permits will not be issued until approved wetland permits have been
received. See “Wetland Alteration” of this staff report for more information.
2. Wetland review will include ensuring hydrology is maintained to all wetlands to be
preserved as well as review of proposed stormwater impacts.
3. Storm sewer sizing calculations should be provided to confirm storm sewer is sized to
convey the 10-year storm event.
4. A NPDES permit and accompanying Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
will be required prior to the start of construction.
5. An operations and maintenance plan for the proposed stormwater management system
will be required prior to approval.
6. Provide infiltration test results per MPCA Requirements in the location of each proposed
infiltration area.
7. All comments and conditions set forth by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed
District shall be addressed by the applicant.
Preliminary Plans
1. Show all existing storm sewer and other water resource related features in plans.
2. Adjust and show all easements over the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services’
sanitary sewer on the preliminary and final plat.
3. Clearly indicate what storm sewer will be private and what will be public. All public
storm sewer will be required to be shown in profile view. Applicant should confirm there
are no conflicts with the watermain or sanitary sewer throughout the site.
4. The following comments pertain to all proposed ponds that include an infiltration bench
(Basins 100, 200 and 300):
a. Infiltration test results will be required in the location of all proposed infiltration
benches and infiltration basins. Infiltration test results have not been submitted in
the location of proposed Basin 100. If filtration is to be used, the applicant will
need to provide a specification for amended soils.
b. The exfiltration above the piped outlet elevation should be included in the
HydroCAD model and the exfiltration rate should correspond to what is presented
in the infiltration test results.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 25of 45
c. The proposed infiltration benches will be required to meet the 48-hour drawdown
requirement.
d. Outlets from the pond should be moved out of the permanent pond area and
should be moved away from the inlet to minimize the risk of short circuiting.
5. The proposed piped outlet being modeled for Basin 400 is not shown in the plans.
6. Access routes for all proposed stormwater basins are required for maintenance purposes.
Applicant should callout access locations for all proposed stormwater basins.
7. A defined riprap EOF spillway will be required for all stormwater basins per details
provided on Sheet 33. Applicant should include location and elevation of all EOF
spillways on the storm sewer plans.
HydroCAD Model
1. The soil borings provided show that there are clay soils throughout the site. Modeling
should be updated to reflect the D soils present.
2. Proposed and existing HydroCAD models should be modeling the same area. There is
roughly 120 acres included in the existing conditions model that is not included in the
proposed conditions model. All offsite drainage should be included in the models.
3. Existing and proposed conditions drainage area maps should be updated to show the
location and boundaries of all subcatchments included in the models.
4. Time of concentrations should be calculated in HydroCAD and not directly entered to
confirm accuracy. Provide supporting calculations for all directly entered times of
concentrations.
5. From the drainage area maps, it appears that P-LU 2-6 (P.E. Edit) in the existing model
corresponds to Pond 500P in the proposed conditions model. The modeled storage for
the wetland differs between the existing and proposed conditions models but no wetland
impacts are shown on Sheet 37 for this wetland. Applicant should update the models so
that they have the same storage modeled for the wetland.
a. There is a proposed piped outlet from this wetland that is over 4 feet lower than
the current natural spillway outlet. The applicant will be required to show that
this does not change the hydrology of the existing wetland as part of the wetland
permit requirements.
6. There are numerous inconsistencies between what is shown in the plans on Sheet 35 for
the outlets of the stormwater basins and what is being modeled in HydroCAD and P8.
Applicant will need to update the models so that they are representative of what is being
shown in the plans.
P8 Model
1. The same total area should be modeled in P8 as in HydroCAD.
2. The model should be run for at least 50 years and should include the most recent
precipitation data included in the precipitation file to get accurate removal efficiencies.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 26of 45
3. The modeling of the proposed stormwater ponds with filtration benches is incorrect and
is overestimating the removal efficiencies of the basins. The applicant should update the
model for the stormwater basins in the following way:
a. The design infiltration rate should be added to the flood pool section of the
stormwater pond devices where applicable. This will model infiltration above the
outlet elevation. The design infiltration rate should match what is being modeled
in HydroCAD.
b. The infiltration basins should be removed from the model (except for Device
600i).
c. Applicant should confirm total phosphorus and total suspended solids removal
requirements are still being met after the model has been updated.
4. Watersheds 201 and 600 are only modeling the impervious area. The pervious area in
these watersheds should be added to the model.
5. Watershed 300 in the P8 model has 25% impervious while the corresponding HydroCAD
subwatershed has 45% impervious modeled. Applicant should update the models to be
consistent with one another and representative of the plans.
Stormwater Management Plan
1. The total areas listed in the table in Section III.A of the Stormwater Management Plan are
inconsistent with the total area called out in the plans and the total area being modeled.
Applicant should include the entire site in the areas shown in the table.
WETLAND ALTERATION
Wetland Protection
The plan set shows intent to impact several wetlands on site. A Wetland Replacement Plan
application needs to be submitted to the cityand reviewed per the WCA. Many requirements of
Article VI have not been addressed. Some of the important requirements include:
1. Any projects seeking a wetland alteration permit subject to this article will also be
required to submit the following incomplete requirements: Existing and proposed
drainage areas to wetlands; Buffer strip plan meeting the criteria of subsections 20-411(c)
and (d).
2. Sec. 20-416. Mitigation. Wetland mitigation shall be undertaken on-site. If this is not
feasible, then mitigation may occur locally within the subwatershed. If this is not
possible, then mitigation may occur outside the subwatershed, elsewhere in the city. If
mitigation cannot be accomplished on-site or if the city deems it necessary to perform
mitigation off-site, then the applicant shall be responsible for providing off-site
mitigation within the major subwatershed as designated by the Minnesota Wetland
Conservation Act, or purchasing wetland credits from the state wetland bank.
3. Stormwater runoff shall not be discharged into wetlands without water quality
pretreatment as prescribed by this Code.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 27of 45
4. If a wetland alteration permit is issued allowing wetland alteration, the following
standards shall be followed: (1) The alteration will not have a net adverse effect on the
ecological and hydrological characteristics of remaining wetland,(2) It shall belocated as
to minimize the impact on vegetation, (3) It shall not adversely change water flow, (4)
The size of the altered area shall be limited to the minimum required for the proposed
action, (5) The disposal of any excess material is prohibited within remaining wetland
areas, (6) The disposal of any excess material shall include proper erosion control and
nutrient retention measures, (7) Alterations to any wetland area are prohibited during
waterfowl breeding season or fish spawning season, unless it is determined by the city
that the wetland is not used for waterfowl breeding or fish spawning, (8) Alterations to
wetland areas shall be mitigated in accordance with the requirements of this article if the
activity results in a loss of wetland area and/or function and value of the wetland.
5. The alteration shall not alter the hydrological patterns in the remainder of the wetland, if
a portion of the wetland remains, unless exempted under Sec. 20-417. Please show how
hydrologic patterns will not be altered for the remaining wetlands.
6. Sec. 20-405. Wetland delineation. An electronic copy of the delineated wetland
boundaries must be submitted in a format compatible with the city's GIS database.
7. Sec. 20-406. Wetland classification. All wetlands delineated under Sec. 20-405 of this
article that have not been previously classified shall be classified using the results from
the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions (MnRAM
Version 3.0), or future versions. A MnRAM shall be completed by the property owner or
applicant for each previously unclassified wetland. An electronic version of the MnRAM
evaluation must be submitted to and approved by the city to establish the classification of
each wetland prior to any alteration or impact to the wetland.
8. Staff review will be conditional upon an approved Wetland Replacement Plan.
9. A grading permit cannot be issued until the applicant has completed the WCA process.
10. Wetland Buffers. Wetland buffers and buffer monumentation will be required adjacent to
the wetlands on site. Please indicate wetland buffers widths and locations where signage
will be placed on a plan sheet. Please find additional information on signage placement
in the guidance document attached. The WMO provides signs and sign posts for the cost
of materials. Alternative signs (by the city or applicant) are also acceptable provided
they contain similar information.
11. Sec. 19-146. Wetland elements.
a. Water level fluctuations (peak elevation and duration) for wetlands shall be
limited to two feet and duration not to exceed 48 hours so as to prevent the
destruction of wildlife habitat and wetland vegetation.
b. Sedimentation basins or sediment removal devices shall be provided prior to
discharge into wetlands.
c. Variable bottom contours should be considered to provide deeper holes and flat
shallow benches. This feature will provide habitat for diversity of plants and
wetland inhabitants for wetland mitigation sites and stormwater basins.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 28of 45
WetlandAcresStatus
141.9preserved
20.18preserved
30.16filled
40.2filled
50.05filled
60.06preserved
70.62preserved
80.17preserved
90.38preserved
100.13preserved
112.79preserved
120.6filled
12A0.04filled
130.03preserved
140.23filled
Percent
Total47.54100%
Filled1.283%
Preserved46.2697%
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 29of 45
EROSION PREVENTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject
to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction
Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES
Construction Permit). The applicant has prepared and submitted a Surface Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the city for review. The SWPPP is a required submittal element for
preliminary plat review. No earth disturbing activities may occur until an approved SWPPP is
developed. This SWPPP shall be a standalone document consistent with the NPDES
Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements as listed in Parts III and IV of the
permit. The SWPPP will need to be updated as the plans are finalized, when the contractor and
their sub-contractors are identified and as other conditions change.
Financial Assurance. To guarantee compliance with the plan and related remedial work, a cash
escrow or letter of credit, satisfactory to the city, shall be furnished to the city before a building
permit is issued. The escrow amount shall be $7,500.00 per acre. The city may use the escrow
or draw upon the letter of credit to reimburse the city for any labor or material costs it incurs in
securing compliance with the plan or in implementing the plan. If the city draws on the
escrowed funds, no additional building permits shall be issued until the pre-draw escrow balance
has been restored. The city shall endeavor to give notice to the owner or developer before
proceeding, but such notice shall not be required in an emergency as determined by the city. The
assurance shall be maintained until final stabilization and removal of erosion and sediment
controls.
STORMWATER UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGES
Section 4-30 of City Code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. Water
quality and water quantity fees are collected with a subdivision. These fees are based on land
use type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the
greater the degradation of surface water.
This fee will be applied to the new lot of record being created. It is calculated as shown in the
table below:
AREA
PER ACRE FEEACRESFEE
GROSS AREA
$8,320191.0465$ 1,589,506.88
SURFACE WATER
ROW$8,32016.79$ (139,692.80)
DEVELOPMENT FEE
OUTLOTS$8,320122.3114$ (1,017,630.85)
NET AREA51.9451$ 432,183.23
The SWMP Fee is $432,183.23 pending any plan revisions.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 30of 45
ASSESSMENTS
Water and sewer partial hookups are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup fees will be
assessed at the rate in effect at that time. The remaining partial hookups fees are due with the
building permit.
FEES
Based on the proposal,the following fees would be collected with the development contract:
Administration Fee: If the improvement costs are between $500,000 and $1,000,000, 2%
of the improvement costs. If the improvement costs exceed $1,000,000, 2.5% of the first
$1,000,000 plus 1.5% of the remainder.
Surface Water Management fee: $432,183.23
A portion of the water hook-up charge: $2,311/unit
A portion of the sanitary sewer hook-up charge: $691/unit
GIS fees: $25 for the plat plus $10 per parcel
Street light operating fee for one year: $300 per light.
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 31of 45
The applicant for the Galpin Property development submitted tree canopy coverage and
preservation calculations. However, the minimum parkland dedication of 9.1 acres was not
included in the calculations; it has been incorporated into staff’s calculations.
Total upland area (excl wetlands, bluff and parkland) 130.2 acres
Baseline canopy coverage 69% or 89.8 acres
Minimum canopy coverage required 46% or 59.8 acres
Proposed tree preservation 36% or 47.5 acres
The developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage for the site; therefore, the applicant
must bring the canopy coverage on site up to the 46% minimum. The difference between the
required coverage and the remaining coverage is multiplied by 1.2 for total area to be replaced.
One tree is valued at 1,089 SF.
Minimum required 59.8 acres
Less canopy preserved 47.5 acres
Minimum canopy coverage to be replaced 12.3 acres
Multiplied by 1.2 14.76 acres
Divided by 1089 = Total number of trees to be planted 590 trees
The applicant has submitted a landscape plan showing a total of 397 trees to be planted in the
development. The applicant shall increase tree planting in the development to meet minimum
requirements.
While it may seem that tree removal on the site is significant, the intensity of it is regulated to the
proposed development of the west side of the property. Out of a total of 89.8 acres, which does
not include wooded wetlands, forested bluffs or parkland dedication, 42.3 acres will be removed
for homes, but a majority of 47.5 (52% of existing woods) acres will be preserved. This is a
positive outcome for the preservation of natural resources on the site.
The development is required to install a buffer yard along Galpin Boulevard.
Landscaping Item RequiredProposed
Bufferyard B – Galpin Boulevard., 12 Overstory trees 12 Overstory trees
1200’ 24 Understory trees 66 Evergreen trees
24 Shrubs0 Shrubs
The applicant is also proposing bufferyard planting along the south property line. According to
ordinance, a low-density development abutting a low-density development is not required to
have a bufferyard.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 32of 45
Landscaping Item RequiredProposed
Bufferyard B – South property 0 Overstory trees 6 Overstory trees
line, 1050’0 Understory trees 61 Evergreen trees
0 Shrubs0 Shrubs
The city well house on Galpin Boulevard abuts the development. Staff recommends that buffer
plantings be added to the east of the building. There are also three oaks on city property to the
south of the building that appear to be within the grading limits for a proposed pond. Staff
recommends that these trees remain and the grading limits be adjusted to provide for
preservation by avoiding any grading within the critical root zone areas of the trees.
The plant schedule submitted with the landscape plan lists overstory and evergreen tree
selections. Applying the city ordinance dealing with species diversity, each type (species) of tree
should be in quantities of 40 or less (10% of the total) and each group (Genus) of trees (maples,
oaks, etc.) should have no more than 80 specified. Using those designations, staff recommends
that Autumn Blaze maples be eliminated from the plant schedule since maples comprise 23% of
the total trees and these types of maples are overplanted and have an undesirable structure as
they mature. The applicant shall choose a different genus of tree to replace the Autumn Blaze.
Other trees which are noted in excess of the maximum quantities allowed include Northern Pin
Oak, Black Hills Spruce and White Pine. These quantities must be reduced to a maximum of
10% of the total trees and new varieties of trees added to increase diversity of plantings.
Additionally, Northern Pin Oak shall be replaced with white, bur, red or bicolor oak species.
The alkaline soils of Chanhassen make the Northern Pin Oak selection undesirable for long-term
survivability. Additional selections of tree species should expand the breadth of tree types and
take into consideration soil conditions and future hardiness zone changes.
Staff has reviewed the tree clearing limits for the development on the plans and on site. There
are a number of trees at the edge of the grading limits that staff would like to consider for
preservation. Staff requests that the developer conduct a walk-through of the grading limits on
site prior to removals with city staff to inspect for opportunities for additional tree preservation.
Grading and tree removal is not allowed within the bluff impact zone. The grading plan does not
show the impact zone on the plans and proposed grading and tree removal to the top of the
bluffs. The applicant shall revise the plans to show the bluff impact zone on both bluffs and
eliminate grading within these areas. Additionally, private lot boundaries should not encompass
surveyed bluff areas. Property lines could meet the edge of the bluff, but not encroach into it.
Staff recommends that lots with significant tree cover contain conservation easements to protect
the wooded areas. Lots 101, 104, 105, 130 and 131 should have protective easements over parts
of the lot containing existing forest. Specifically, the rear 40’ of Lot 101, the rear 100’ of Lots
104 and 105, the westerly 200’ of Lot 130 and the easterly 250’-300’ of Lot 131.
Staff fully supports the clustering of development/density transfer to preserve the significant
open space to the east. The existing woods on the east side of the property contain significant
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 33of 45
oaks, maples, and other native species. Many of these trees are over a hundred years old and
provide a wooded legacy within the community. Traditional subdivision development would not
preserve as many trees and would compromise the health of Lake Ann by removing woods and
vegetation along the lakeshore. As stated earlier, the applicant is preserving a majority of the
existing woods on site thereby allowing the Chanhassen community, and more directly the
residents of this neighborhood, an experience not found in every community whereby significant
open space is reachable and accessible from someone’s front door. That experience is a raregem
and would offer this neighborhood, and the others adjacent to it, an enhanced quality of life.
PARKS & RECREATION
Summary
Lennar is proposing to develop 191 acres of property located midway between W.78th Street
and Lake Lucy Road and east of Galpin Boulevard. The existing zoning is rural residential and
the existing guide plan designation is residential low density (1.2- 4 units per acre). Two concept
plans were originally submitted by Lennar for consideration. One plan titled Concept Plan 04
depicted an invariable plat of uniform sized residential single-family lots covering all quadrants
of the property. A second plan titled Concept Plan 07 depicted a variable plat of mixed lot sizes
clustered to the west-central and north-central quadrants of the property, 3.6 units per acre, and
preserving 100+/acres of public park area utilizing a density transfer and park dedication in the
eastern quadrant of the property. The Park and Recreation Commission supported the density
transfer and park dedication proposal at a concept review on June 28, 2018.
Background
This site has been held as an estate property in the community for an extended period of time and
is now being proposed for development as a single-family home community. The property
includes a large quadrant of land identified in the city's Comprehensive Plan as conceptual park
expansion area and in the city's Parks and Recreation System Plan as a priority park expansion
area. This eastern quadrant proposed for preservation is 100+/acres in size consisting of wetlands
and wooded uplands and featuring extensive shoreline on both Lake Lucy and Lake Ann.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 34of 45
Discussion
Upon completing conceptual plan review with city Commissions and Council this past summer,
Lennar also held a neighborhood meeting in November and met with individual residents to
receive feedback on the proposed development. The preliminary plat that has developed as a
result of the input gained from these reviews, is an excellent model of the use of a PUD. City
Code states "The use of a planned unit development for residential purposes should result in a
reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city and developer. The developer gains the
potential for offering reduced lot sizes and the flexibility indevelopment standards that resultin
a combination of reduced development costs and improved marketing flexibility. At the same
time, the city should be offered enhanced environmental sensitivity beyond normal ordnance
requirements". The city's PUD ordinance addresses the desire for the creation of parks and open
space consistent with the city's planning documents.
The proposed PUD, with the noted conditions, provides public benefit and helps the city meet
stated goals with respect to parks, trails, and open space by:
Preserving for the public 100+/acres of unique natural open space with very high
recreational and environmental value. This includes 50+/acres of upland around Lake
Ann and Lake Lucy that might otherwise be privatized.
Providing land and connections for trails to eliminate trail gaps and better connect the
community and natural areas.
Allowing for the expansion of Lake Ann Park and enhancing its role as Chanhassen's
premier community park.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 35of 45
This proposed PUD benefits all parties and ultimately fulfills the desires and intent of the city’s
Comprehensive Plan and Park and Recreation System Plan.
On December 28, 2018, the city received letters from Lennar and Comerica requesting additional
compensation for the proposed 50+/acre dedication ofupland for park purposes above and
beyond the granting of full park dedication fee credit ($1,107,800) and application of a density
transfer moving housing density from the eastern half of the property to the western half of the
property. In that this is a PUD application, staff is not recommending that compensation be
granted beyond the density transfer and full park dedication fee credit.
RECOMMENDATION
Denial
“The City Council denies the Rezoning of 191 acres from Rural Residential District, RR, to
Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD-R, including the PUD ordinance “Galpin Design
Standards”
“The City Council denies the Wetland Alteration Permit of 1.28 acres of wetland impacts
subject to conditions in the staff report;
“The City Council denies the Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating 181 lots, three outlots and
dedication of public right-of-way, as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated
February 28, 2019.
And
The City Council a adopts the attached findings of fact and decision for denial.
Approval
“The City Council approves the Rezoning of 191 acres from Rural Residential District, RR, to
Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD-R, including the PUD ordinance “Galpin Design
Standards”
“The City Council approves the Wetland Alteration Permit of 1.28acresofwetland impacts
subject to conditions in the staff report;
“The City Council approves the Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating 181 lots, three outlots
and dedication of public right-of-way, as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated
February 28, 2019, subject to conditions in the staff report subject to the following conditions:
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 36of 45
Parks &Recreation
1. Dedication of 100+/- acres of wooded open spaces and wetlands in the eastern half of the
property to the City of Chanhassen forparkland in exchange for a housing density transfer
and fulfillment of a nine +/-acre parkland dedication requirement.
2. Acknowledgement that the dedicated land may be developed at the city's discretion as
parkland for public use and may include, but is not limited to trails, boardwalks, bridges,
structures, and signage.
3. The planning, engineering and construction of a 10-foot wide bituminous east/west trail
connection between Galpin Boulevard and a location east of Street “D” and a 10-foot wide
bituminous trail adjacent to Galpin Boulevard between Street “E” and Street “A”.
4. All trails shall meet all city standards for trail construction.
5. The east/west trail shall maintain a minimum 10-foot setback from outside edges of trail to
private property and be designed to minimize encroachment of wetland buffers.
6. The east/west trail crossing of Street “A” shall be relocated from a midblock crossing as
shown to the intersection of Street “A” and Street “D”.
7. The east/west trail be designed and constructed so as not to require retaining walls.
8. The entirety of the east/west trail and associated buffers shall be constructed within the
dedicated public outlots.
9. The entirety of the Galpin Boulevard trail between Street “E” and Street “A” shall be
constructed in dedicated public right-of-way.
10. The planning, engineering and construction of 10-foot wide bituminous trails connecting
both Street “Z” and Topaz Drive Ridge Lane to the planned trail at the western edge of Lake
Lucy including trail easements.
Planning
1. All 191 acres must be included in the PUD.
2. All lots and homes must be developed consistent with the standards in the Compliance Table.
3. Approve the length of the cul-de-sac on Street “Z”.
Engineering
1. Any requirements set by the MCES to work within the MCES’s sewer and utility easement
shall be addressed by the applicant.
2. An executed agreement between the developer and the MCES allowing work within the
MCES’s easement shall be provided to the city prior to the issuance of grading permits.
3. The width of the MCES sewer and utility easement shall be called out on the final plat prior
to acceptance and recording.
4. The width of the public right-of-ways shall be called out on the final plat prior to acceptance
and recording, this includes radii cul-de-sacs bulbs.
5. Thirty foot (30’)wide drainage and utility easements, for the purpose of accessing utilities
and basins, shall be provided between but not limited to Lots 109 and 110 abutting the cul-
de-sac of Lucy Ridge Lane and Topaz Drive, Lots 152 and 153 abutting Street “E”, Lots 119
and 120 abutting Street “D”, in the area of Lots 128 and 130 abutting Street “Z” where the
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 37of 45
water main loop is to be installed, andLots 120 and 121 abutting Street “Z” prior to
acceptance and recording.
6. Right-of-way dedication in conformance with the attached Carver County
Development/Access Review Comments, subject to review and approval by the county and
city prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat.
7. On-going coordination with the county and city regarding future improvements to Galpin
Boulevard. Also see Condition 25.
th
8. The developer shall underground all overhead utilities from W.78 Street to the northern
properly line of the development.
9. The developer shall locate on the existing condition survey all existing wells and septic
fields.
10. The developer shall abandon all existing wells and septic fields in accordance with all
federal, state and local regulatory agency standards, and obtain all necessary permits for said
abandonments. Prior to commencement of abandonment activities, a copy of all required
permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the city.
11. Provide an updated existing condition survey that illustrates the MCES sanitary and utility
easements on parcels 250100400 and 257580040.
12. The applicant shall submit a mass grading plan or a phased grading plan (as applicable) for
review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits.
13. Proposed spot elevations shall be shown on the grading plans at the center of the proposed
driveway at the curbline for review prior to issuance of grading permits.
14. Proposed spot elevations shall be shown on the grading plans at top of curb for review prior
to issuance of grading permits.
15. Slopes north of Street “Z” called out as 2:1 between stations 6+50 and 11+00 shall be
adjusted to achieve a minimum slope of 2.5:1.
16. Drainage arrows for all EOF routes shall be included on the grading plans prior to issuance of
grading permits.
17.Grading plans shall be updated to include bluff extents and setbacks. Grading within bluff
setbacks is subject to review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits.
18.All existing buildings and structures within the city’s well house #3 property abutting Galpin
Boulevard shall be included on the grading plans.
19.Grading plans shall be updated to include the location and grade of the improved and
relocated access driveway to well house #3 off Galpin Boulevard.
20.Grading plans shall be updated to include the location and protection methodology of the
significant oak tree on the well house #3 site.
21. The low point south of the catch basin (CBMH-306) near the intersection of Street “E” and
Street “H” shall be adjusted to be adjacent to the catch basin.
22. The applicant shall submit revised grading plans and stormwater plans so that no stormwater
runoff flows directly onto the public trail south of Lots 164-174 abutting Street “A”.
23. Slopes shall not exceed 10% immediately to the east of Lot 110 abutting Street “A” where
stormwater conveyance systems are proposed.
24. An updated geotechnical report assessing slope stability immediately east of Lot 110 abutting
Street “A” shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading
permits.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 38of 45
25. Final grading plans, including pond locations, sizing and analysis, along with right-of-way
dedications off Galpin Boulevard, shall conform to the future Galpin Boulevard
reconstruction project. Cross reference of grading plans, profiles, and respective cross
sections are to be provided at key locations such as intersections, ponds, or other special
features required by the county and city for review prior to acceptance and recording of the
final plat.
26. All retaining walls exceeding 4’ in height shall have plans and details prepared by a
registered engineer or landscape architect prior to issuance of building permits.
27. The retaining wall south of Lots 108-111 abutting Street “A” shall be adjusted to
accommodate a 1.5:1 buffer from the bottom of the proposed stormwater line to the bottom
of the proposed retaining wall foundation.
28. Spot elevations of top of wall and bottom of wall for the retaining wall behind Lots 161-163
abutting Street “A” shall be included on the grading plans.
29. Grading and construction within bluff setbacks are subject to review and approval by the city
prior to issuance of grading permits. This includes, but is not limited to, the retaining wall
located south of Lots 123-125 abutting Street “Z”.
30. All newly constructed streets and the extension of any existing streets shall be public streets,
owned and maintained by the city,after acceptance of the public improvements by the City
Council.
31. All newly constructed public streets shall be designed to meet the current standard
specifications and detail plate for residential streets (Detail Plate #5200), unless otherwise
directed by the City Engineer.
32. Any and all conditions associated with the alignment and configuration of Street “Z” set by
the Planning Commission or City Council shall be addressed by the applicant prior to
acceptance and recording of the final plat.
33. The applicant shall remove all impervious surface from the existing Ruby Lane stub-out,
construct half street improvements (extending curb and gutter) on Topaz Drive, and restore
the area to the surrounding conditions.
34. The existing driveway off Galpin Boulevardlocated on parcel 250100400 shall be abandoned
and tied into Street “Z”.
35. A water service lateral shall be stubbed off Street “Z”’s watermain for the future connection
to parcel 250100400.
36. An updated geotechnical report with additional soil borings shall be provided for review and
approval prior to the commencement of construction.
37. Sidewalks shall be extended along the cul-de-sacs located off Streets “D”, “G”, and “Z” and
shall be constructed in accordance with the city’s standard specifications and detail plates for
concrete sidewalks.
38. The applicant shall install curb ramps for pedestrian access to stretches of sidewalk greater
than 500’ between intersections and/or proposed curb ramps.
39. All curb ramps shall be constructed to meet ADA standards and the city’s Detail Plates
#5215-5215D.
40. Intersection improvements to provide pedestrian access at the intersection of Galpin
Boulevard and Street “E” shall be constructed in accordance with MUTCD best management
practices.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 39of 45
41. A detail of the proposed street lights shall be provided prior to the issuance of building
permits.
42. An enumerated list of all street lights and their proposed locations shall be provided for
review and approval prior to the recording of the final plat.
43. Street lights shall be installed at all intersections and at the end of each cul-de-sac subject to
review and approval of the city prior to issuance of building permits.
44. The site plan shall be updated to provide proposed street grades (centerline gradients).
45. All newly constructed water mains shall be public water mains, owned and maintained by the
city,after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council.
46. Water mains located on Streets “A”-“H” and Street “Z” shall be tied into the high-pressure
zone located on Galpin Boulevard. Water main extensions on Topaz Drive and Lucy Ridge
Lane shall be tied into the existing water main stubs (low-pressure zone).
47. The water main located on Street “Z” shall be tied into the existing stub off Ruby Lane and a
gate valve near the connection point shall be installed. The gate valve shall be closed to
separate the pressure zones.
48. The developer shall field verify the location of all water main taps prior to the issuance of
building permits and update the plans accordingly.
49. The developer’s contractor shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with Engineering and
Public Works Utilities prior to the commencement of any work to the water main installation
and tapping.
50. Updated plans indicating the location of all underground utilities on the east side of Galpin
Boulevard, along with plans and profiles of any utility crossings on the east side of Galpin
Boulevard, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits.
51. An agreement that lists the conditions and required improvements for the land swap between
the developer and the city regarding Lot 163 and a portion of the well house #3 site, shall be
executed and recorded prior to the acceptance and recording of the final plat.
52. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary and/or storm mains will require 18” of
vertical separation and 10’ of horizontal separation. The developer shall submit construction
plans with profiles and plan views of the utilities for review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
53. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary sewer will require that the sanitary sewer
main at that crossing be constructed of PVC C900 water main material. The developer shall
submit construction plans indicating material type at these locations for review and approval
of the city prior to issuance of building permits.
54. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating that pipe lengths of sanitary sewer
mains are centered over potable water crossings.
55. Water mains shall be constructed at 7.5’ below grade, or insulated, and constructed in
conformance with the city’s standard specifications and detail plates.
56. Cluster valves located around water main tees shall be installed at a minimum of 5’ from the
tees to the valves, where feasible. All valve locations and any other water main
appurtenances shall be reviewed and approved by Engineering and Public Works prior to the
issuance of building permits.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 40of 45
57. All comments and conditions regarding fire appurtenances, spacing, and location set forth by
the Fire Department shall be addressed by the applicant.
58. All newly constructed sewer mains shall be public sewer mains, owned and maintained by
the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council.
59. A 30’ utility easement shall be recorded over the existing public sewer line, within Outlot A
located near the south-central area of the preliminary plat, prior to acceptance of final plat.
60. All conditions set forth by the MCES for the direct connection and installation of an access
manhole to their trunk line shall be addressed by the applicant, and all permits required for
the connection and installation of the manhole shall be obtained prior to the commencement
of construction.
61. The applicant shall fieldverify the proposed sanitary sewer connection and existing sewer
system configuration at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and Hunter Drive prior to the
submittal of construction plans.
62. The applicant shall ensure the city’s sanitary sewer nomenclature is incorporated in the
construction plans.
63. Profile sheets for all public utilities, including sanitary sewer, shall be required for review
and approval by the city prior to issuance of building permits.
64. PVC sanitary sewer pipes that will be constructed at a burial depth of 0-16 feet shall be
constructed of pipe class SDR 35, burial depths of 16-26 feet shall be of pipe class SDR 26,
and burial depths of greater than 26 feet shall be of pipe class C900.
65. Inverts that have a 20 inch or greater differential shall be supplied inside drops per city
standards and be constructed per the city’s Detail Plate No. 2104.
66. The applicant shall submit construction drawings that isolate flow directions via separate
manholes and independent pipe systems.
Stormwater Conditions & Wetlands
The SWMP Fee is $432,183.23, pending any plan revisions. This fee will be applied to the new
lot of record being created. It is calculated as shown in the table below:
AREA
PER ACRE FEEACRESFEE
GROSS AREA$8,320191.0465$ 1,589,506.88
SURFACE WATER
ROW$8,32016.79$ (139,692.80)
DEVELOPMENT FEE
OUTLOTS$8,320122.3114$ (1,017,630.85)
NET AREA51.9451$ 432,183.23
Assessments
Water and sewer partial hookups are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup fees will be
assessed at the rate in effect at that time. The remaining partial hookups fees are due with the
building permit.
Fees
Based on the proposal,the following fees would be collected with the development contract:
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 41of 45
Administration Fee: If the improvement costs are between $500,000 and $1,000,000, 2%
of the improvement costs. If the improvement costs exceed $1,000,000, 2.5% of the first
$1,000,000 plus 1.5% of the remainder.
Surface Water Management Fee: $432,183.23
A portion of the water hook-up charge: $2,311/unit
A portion of the sanitary sewer hook-up charge: $691/unit
GIS fees: $25 for the plat plus $10 per parcel
Street light operating fee for one year: $300 per light
1. Wetland permitting is required due to the proximity and proposed impacts to wetlands on
site. A wetland permit application has not yet been received by the city from the applicant.
Grading permits will not be issued until approved wetland permits have been received.
2. Wetland review will include ensuring hydrology is maintained to all wetlands to be preserved
as well as review of proposed stormwater impacts.
3. Storm sewer sizing calculations should be provided to confirm storm sewer is sized to
convey the 10-year storm event.
4. An NPDES permit and accompanying Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will
be required prior to the start of construction.
5. An operations and maintenance plan for the proposed stormwater management system will
be required prior to approval.
6. Provide infiltration test results per MPCA Requirements in the location of each proposed
infiltration area.
7. All comments and conditions set forth by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District
shall be addressed by the applicant.
8. Show all existing storm sewer and other water resource related features in plans.
9. Adjust and show all easements over the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services’
sanitary sewer on the preliminary and final plat.
10. Clearly indicate what storm sewer will be private and what will be public. All public storm
sewer will be required to be shown in profile view. Applicant should confirm there are no
conflicts with the watermain or sanitary sewer throughout the site.
11. The following comments pertain to all proposed ponds that include an infiltration bench
(Basins 100, 200 and 300):
a. Infiltration test results will be required in the location of all proposed infiltration
benches and infiltration basins. Infiltration test results have not been submitted in the
location of proposed Basin 100. If filtration is to be used, the applicant will need to
provide a specification for amended soils.
b. The exfiltration above the piped outlet elevation should be included in the HydroCAD
model and the exfiltration rate should correspond to what is presented in the
infiltration test results.
c. The proposed infiltration benches will be required to meet the 48-hour drawdown
requirement.
d. Outlets from the pond should be moved out of the permanent pond area and should be
moved away from the inlet to minimize the risk of short circuiting.
12. The proposed piped outlet being modeled for Basin 400 is not shown in the plans.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 42of 45
13. Access routes for all proposed stormwater basins are required for maintenance purposes.
Applicant should callout access locations for all proposed stormwater basins.
14. A defined riprap EOF spillway will be required for all stormwater basins per details provided
on Sheet 33. Applicant should include location and elevation of all EOF spillways on the
storm sewer plans.
15. The soil borings provided show that there are clay soils throughout the site. Modeling should
be updated to reflect the D soils present.
16. Proposed and existing HydroCAD models should be modeling the same area. There is
roughly 120 acres included in the existing conditions model that is not included in the
proposed conditions model. All offsite drainage should be included in the models.
17. Existing and proposed conditions drainage area maps should be updated to show the location
and boundaries of all subcatchments included in the models.
18. Time of concentrations should be calculated in HydroCAD and not directly entered to
confirm accuracy. Provide supporting calculations for all directly entered times of
concentrations.
19. From the drainage area maps, it appears that P-LU 2-6 (P.E. Edit) in the existing model
corresponds to Pond 500P in the proposed conditions model. The modeled storage for the
wetland differs between the existing and proposed conditions models but no wetland impacts
are shown on Sheet 37 for this wetland. Applicant should update the models so that they
have the same storage modeled for the wetland.
a. There is a proposed piped outlet from this wetland that is over four feet lower than the
current natural spillway outlet. The applicant will be required to show that this does
not change the hydrology of the existing wetland as part of the wetland permit
requirements.
20. There are numerous inconsistencies between what is shown in the plans on Sheet 35 for the
outlets of the stormwater basins and what is being modeled in HydroCAD and P8. Applicant
will need to update the models so that they are representative of what is being shown in the
plans.
21. The same total area should be modeled in P8 as in HydroCAD.
22. The model should be run for at least 50 years and should include the most recent
precipitation data included in the precipitation file to get accurate removal efficiencies.
23. The modeling of the proposed stormwater ponds with filtration benches is incorrect and is
overestimating the removal efficiencies of the basins. The applicant should update the model
for the stormwater basins in the following way:
a. The design infiltration rate should be added to the flood pool section of the
stormwater pond devices where applicable. This will model infiltration above the
outlet elevation. The design infiltration rate should match what is being modeled in
HydroCAD.
b. The infiltration basins should be removed from the model (except for Device 600i).
c. Applicant should confirm total phosphorus and total suspended solids removal
requirements are still being met after the model has been updated.
24. Watersheds 201 and 600 are only modeling the impervious area. The pervious area in these
watersheds should be added to the model.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 43of 45
25. Watershed 300 in the P8 model has 25% impervious while the corresponding HydroCAD
subwatershed has 45% impervious modeled. Applicant should update the models to be
consistent with one another and representative of the plans.
26. The total areas listed in the table in Section III.A of the Stormwater Management Plan are
inconsistent with the total area called out in the plans and the total area being modeled.
Applicant should include the entire site in the areas shown in the table.
27. Any projects seeking a wetland alteration permit subject to this article will also be required to
submit the following incomplete requirements: Existing and proposed drainage areas to
wetlands; Buffer strip plan meeting the criteria of subsections 20-411(c) and (d).
28. Sec. 20-416. Mitigation. Wetland mitigation shall be undertaken on-site. If this is not
feasible, then mitigation may occur locally within the subwatershed. If this is not possible,
then mitigation may occur outside the subwatershed, elsewhere in the city. If mitigation
cannot be accomplished on site, or if the city deems it necessary to perform mitigation off
site, then the applicant shall be responsible for providing off-site mitigation within the major
subwatershed, as designated by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, or purchasing
wetland credits from the state wetland bank.
29. Stormwater runoff shall not be discharged into wetlands without water quality pretreatment
as prescribed by this Code.
30. If a Wetland Alteration Permit is issued allowing wetland alteration, the following standards
shall be followed: (1) The alteration will not have a net adverse effect on the ecological and
hydrological characteristics of remaining wetland, (2) It shall be located as to minimize the
impact on vegetation, (3) It shall not adversely change water flow, (4) The size of the altered
area shall be limited to the minimum required for the proposed action, (5) The disposal of
any excess material is prohibited within remaining wetland areas, (6) The disposal of any
excess material shall include proper erosion control and nutrient retention measures, (7)
Alterations to any wetland area are prohibited during waterfowl breeding season or fish
spawning season, unless it is determined by the city that the wetland is not used for
waterfowl breeding or fish spawning, and (8) Alterations to wetland areas shall be mitigated
in accordance with the requirements of this article if the activity results in a loss of wetland
area and/or function and value of the wetland.
31. The alteration shall not alter the hydrological patterns in the remainder of the wetland, if a
portion of the wetland remains, unless exempted under Sec. 20-417. Show how hydrologic
patterns will not be altered for the remaining wetlands.
32. Sec. 20-405. Wetland delineation. An electronic copy of the delineated wetland boundaries
must be submitted in a format compatible with the city's GIS database.
33. Sec. 20-406. Wetland classification. All wetlands delineated under Sec. 20-405 of this article
that have not been previously classified shall be classified using the results from the
Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions (MnRAM Version
3.0), or future versions. A MnRAM shall be completed by the property owner or applicant
for each previously unclassified wetland. An electronic version of the MnRAM evaluation
must be submitted to and approved by the city to establish the classification of each wetland
prior to any alteration or impact to the wetland.
34. Staff review will be conditional upon the approved Wetland Replacement Plan.
35. A grading permit cannot be issued until the applicant has completed the WCA process.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 44of 45
36. Wetland Buffers. Wetland buffers and buffer monumentation will be required adjacent to the
wetlands on site. Please indicate wetland buffers widths and locations where signage will be
placed on a plan sheet. Please find additional information on signage placement in the
guidance document attached. The WMO provides signs and sign posts for the cost of
materials. Alternative signs (by the city or applicant) are also acceptable provided they
contain similar information.
37. Sec. 19-146. Wetland elements.
a. Water level fluctuations (peak elevation and duration) for wetlands shall be limited to
two feet and duration not to exceed 48 hours so as to prevent the destruction of
wildlife habitat and wetland vegetation.
b. Sedimentation basins or sediment removal devices shall be provided prior to
discharge into wetlands.
c. Variable bottom contours should be considered to provide deeper holes and flat
shallow benches. This featurewill provide habitat for diversity of plants and wetland
inhabitants for wetland mitigation sites and stormwater basins.
Landscaping and Tree Preservation
1. The developer shall conduct a walk-through of the grading limits on site prior to
removals with city staff to inspect for opportunities for additional tree preservation.
2. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any
construction activities and remain installed until completion.
3. All trees shall be planted outside of the street right-of-way.
4. The applicant shall increase tree planting in the development to meet minimum
requirements of 590 trees.
5. Buffer plantings shall be added to the east of the city well building.
6. The three oaks on city property (not inventoried) to the south of the city well building
shall remain and the grading limits be adjusted to provide for preservation by avoiding
any grading within the critical root zone areas of the trees.
7. Autumn Blaze maples shall be eliminated from the plant schedule.
8. Northern Pin Oak shall be replaced with white, bur, red or bicolor oak species in the plant
schedule.
9. Additional selections of tree species shall expand the breadth of tree types and take into
consideration soil conditions and future hardiness zone changes.
10. No tree Genus shall comprise of more than 20% of the total number of trees and no tree
species shall comprise of more than 10% of the total number of trees.
11. The applicant shall revise the plans to show the bluff impact zone on both bluffs and
eliminate grading within these areas.
12. Private lot boundaries shall not encroach into bluff areas.
13. Lots with significant tree cover contain conservation easements to protect the wooded
areas. Lots 501, 504, 505, 530 and 531 should have protective easements over parts of
the lot containing existing forest. Specifically, the rear 40’ of Lot 501, the rear 100’ of
Lots 504 and 505, the westerly 200’ of Lot 530 and the easterly 250’-300’ of Lot 531.
City Council
Galpin Property Preliminary Subdivision Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2019-01
January 15, 2019 and Updated March11, 2019
Page 45of 45
And
The City Council a adopts the attached findings of fact and decision of approval.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Staff Report
2. PUD Ordinance
3. Findings of Fact and Decision - approval
4. Finding of Fact and Decision - denial
5. Development Review Application
6. Project Narrative
7. Affidavit of Mailing
8. Compliance Table
9. March 5, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes
10. Exhibit A – Home Styles
11. Pioneer Engineering Plan set dated February 28, 2019
12. Fire Marshall Letter
13. Carver County Development / Access Review Comments Letter
14. MCES Comments
15. Army Corp of Engineers dated 1-8-2019
16. Emailed Comments
g:\\plan\\2019 planning cases\\19-01 galpin site preliminary plat and rezoning pud\\pc prelim staff report - 1-15-19.docx
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. XXX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE
CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE
BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS:
Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the city's zoning ordinance, is hereby
amended by rezoning all property describedwithin Exhibit A from Rural Residential District,RR,
to Planned Unit Development Residential, PUD-R.
Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design
standards:
The Galpin Site Zoning Standards
a. Intent
The purpose of this zone is to create a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for single-family detached
housing. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a
higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The development will preserve 50 acres of woods
adjacent to Lake Ann. There are a number of housingcollections with a variety of housing styles
and exterior materials with in each collection serving different life stages.
Except as modified by this PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of
the Residential Low and Medium Density District, RLM.
The property shall be developed in accordance with the following plans.
1. Preliminary Plat
1
2.Landscaping Plan
3. Tree Preservation Plan
4. House Plans (Exhibit A)
b. Permitted Uses
1. The permitted uses in this zoning district shall be single-family detached houses and their
accessory uses. House plans include the Lennar Lifestyle, Luxury, Landmark, Classic and
Villa home plans or similar or equivalent plans.
c. Design Standards
1. Development - Amenities Design
Integrate pathways with the local street system to maximize access and flexibility of use.
2
2. House designs
There shall be a mix and a variety of housing materials.
Linear repetitive streetscape appearance and building facades shall be avoided by
providing variation between the front elevations. No two identical facades shall be
located next to each other.
The same front or rear elevations shall not be located directly across from one another.
No similar material/colors shall be located adjacent to each other.
There shall be articulation of wall planes, a variety of roof forms, variation in roof
heights or other architectural treatments.
If side loaded garages are incorporated into the development, the front facing wall must
be architecturally integrated with the design of the home (no blank wall).
d. Lot Requirements and Setbacks
The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following
table displays those setbacks:
GALPIN PROPERTY COMPLIANCE TABLE
Lot Lot Area Lot Width Lot Impervious
(SF) (Feet) Depth Area (SF)
(Feet)
90 foot 15,000 90 125 5,500
frontage
90 foot 11,250 90 125 5,500
frontage **
65 ft Lots 8,450 65 125 4,400
Front Rear Side Yard Corner CR 117
Setback SetbackSetback Setback Setback
20 ft * 25 ft 7.5 ft 20 ft50 ft
25 ft 25 ft 7.5 ft 20 ft50 ft
Wetland Buffer Setback 20 ft.
*25 ft. with Sidewalk
**Lots 101-111
90 foot frontage
Lot Lot Area Lot Width Lot Impervious
(SF) (Feet) Depth Area (SF)
(Feet)
501 18,092 100177 5,500
502 17,455 90 167 5,500
503 15,030 90 167 5,500
504 22,829 90 249 5,500
505 24,572 90 249 5,500
506 16,733 90 175 5,500
507 18,427 90 201 5,500
508 17,037 90 142 5,500
509 23,848 90 159 5,500
510 20,017 90 137 5,500
511 18,801 90 156 5,500
3
512 17,844 90 167 5,500
513 15,032 90 167 5,500
514 15,030 90 167 5,500
515 16,667 100167 5,500
516 15,574 90 175 5,500
517 15,514 90 175 5,500
518 15,482 90 174 5,500
519 15,576 90 174 5,500
520 15,300 90 170 5,500
521 15,300 90 170 5,500
522 15,300 90 170 5,500
523 15,440 90 172 5,500
524 15,882 90 168 5,500
525 16,629 90 136 5,500
526 22,359 90 140 5,500
527 27,426 90 143 5,500
528 16,764 90 160 5,500
529 15,371 90 165 5,500
530 44,983 90 165 5,500
531 47,788 90 125 5,500
90 foot frontage
Lot Lot Area Lot Width Lot Impervious
(SF) (Feet) Depth Area (SF)
(Feet)
101 19,897 135143 5,500
102 13,371 90 148 5,500
103 13,297 90 148 5,500
104 13,297 90 148 5,500
105 13,297 90 148 5,500
106 13,297 90 148 5,500
107 13,297 90 148 5,500
10813,297901485,500
10914,599901485,500
110 14,840 90 148 5,500
111 25,529 90 148 5,500
Avg. 18,479
65 foot frontage
Lot Lot Area Lot Width Lot Impervious
(SF) (Feet) Depth Area (SF)
(Feet)
301 9,993 78 125 4,400
302 8,450 65 125 4,400
303 8,450 65 125 4,400
304 8,450 65 125 4,400
305 8,450 65 125 4,400
306 8,450 65 125 4,400
307 11,132 65 125 4,400
308 13,748 78 131 4,400
309 8,925 65 129 4,400
310 12,282 65 126 4,400
4
311 8,607 65 125 4,400
312 8,126 65 125 4,400
313 8,257 65 125 4,400
314 8,795 65 130 4,400
315 9,683 65 142 4,400
316 12,836 78 125 4,400
317 12,591 78 150 4,400
318 10,414 65 145 4,400
319 10,228 65 145 4,400
320 11,448 65 145 4,400
321 13,180 65 147 4,400
322 12,052 65 145 4,400
323 11,853 65 142 4,400
324 10,767 65 142 4,400
325 9,524 65 139 4,400
326 9,135 65 132 4,400
327 8,609 65 132 4,400
328 8,609 65 132 4,400
329 10,232 65 132 4,400
330 9,750 65 125 4,400
331 9,478 65 125 4,400
332 10,900 65 125 4,400
333 16,107 78 125 4,400
334 11,215 78 136 4,400
335 10,404 65 153 4,400
336 11,607 65 167 4,400
337 10,622 65 142 4,400
338 11,545 65 133 4,400
339 14,532 65 125 4,400
340 12,761 65 125 4,400
341 13,019 65 125 4,400
342 10,858 65 125 4,400
343 10,887 65 163 4,400
344 10,502 65 152 4,400
345 9,306 65 134 4,400
346 10,263 78 125 4,400
347 10,020 78 125 4,400
348 9,385 65 135 4,400
349 10,984 65 154 4,400
350 10,228 65 126 4,400
351 8,474 65 126 4,400
352 8,474 65 125 4,400
353 8,776 65 125 4,400
354 8,864 65 125 4,400
355 13,586 65 131 4,400
356 14,313 65 130 4,400
357 12,790 65 132 4,400
358 12,963 65 125 4,400
359 14,449 65 145 4,400
360 11,360 65 126 4,400
361 11,011 78 125 4,400
5
362 10,508 65 142 4,400
363 11,458 65 145 4,400
364 13,033 65 130 4,400
365 12,790 65 130 4,400
366 12,940 65 132 4,400
367 12,790 65 130 4,400
368 9,728 65 131 4,400
369 10,036 65 140 4,400
370 10,303 78 125 4,400
371 8,933 65 130 4,400
372 9,242 65 130 4,400
373 9,242 65 130 4,400
374 9,242 65 130 4,400
375 9,236 65 130 4,400
376 8,450 65 130 4,400
377 8,450 65 130 4,400
378 8,450 65 130 4,400
379 8,450 65 130 4,400
380 8,450 65 130 4,400
381 8,801 65 130 4,400
382 15,319 95 130 4,400
383 11,772 78 145 4,400
384 9,453 65 145 4,400
385 9,780 65 145 4,400
386 9,898 65 134 4,400
387 9,263 65 130 4,400
388 8,450 65 130 4,400
389 8,450 65 130 4,400
390 8,450 65 130 4,400
391 8,450 65 130 4,400
392 8,450 65 130 4,400
393 8,749 65 130 4,400
394 9,189 65 130 4,400
395 9,390 65 130 4,400
396 9,313 65 130 4,400
397 8,922 65 134 4,400
398 12,754 78 130 4,400
399 8,474 65 130 4,400
400 8,450 65 130 4,400
401 8,450 65 130 4,400
402 8,450 65 130 4,400
403 8,450 65 130 4,400
404 8,450 65 130 4,400
405 10,504 65 130 4,400
406 11,092 65 130 4,400
407 8,819 65 130 4,400
408 8,450 65 130 4,400
409 8,729 65 130 4,400
410 12,658 78 131 4,400
411 10,192 78 127 4,400
412 9,559 65 127 4,400
6
413 9,104 65 145 4,400
414 9,702 65 137 4,400
415 14,151 65 135 4,400
416 9,676 65 135 4,400
417 8,779 65 130 4,400
418 8,570 65 130 4,400
419 9,103 65 136 4,400
420 9,344 65 143 4,400
421 9,170 65 143 4,400
422 10,929 78 132 4,400
423 12,265 78 142 4,400
424 9,984 65 130 4,400
425 10,465 65 130 4,400
426 11,434 65 159 4,400
427 12,108 65 170 4,400
428 12,591 65 178 4,400
429 12,589 65 178 4,400
430 12,101 65 170 4,400
431 10,764 65 130 4,400
432 9,554 65 130 4,400
433 11,046 78 128 4,400
434 12,618 65 141 4,400
435 14,656 65 212 4,400
436 14,357 65 248 4,400
437 14,285 65 248 4,400
438 13,661 65 200 4,400
439 12,931 65 134 4,400
Avg. 10,475
Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the
aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office
for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the
notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and
made a part of this ordinance.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of _____, 2019 by the City Council of the City
of Chanhassen, Minnesota.
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor
(Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ______________________________)
7
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
IN RE:
Application of U. S. Home Corporation, DBA Lennar, and Comerica Bank and Trust, NA, for
the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprise, Inc. for Rezoning, Preliminary
Plat with a Wetland Alteration Permit.
On January 15, 2019, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled
meeting to consider the application of U. S. Home Corporation, DBA Lennar, and Comerica
Bank and Trust, NA, for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprise, Inc. for
a Rezoning from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development – Residential,
PUD-R; Preliminary Plat approval creating 191 lots and three outlots with and approval of a
Wetland Alteration Permit to fill and alter wetlands on site. The Planning Commission
conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning, subdivisionand wetland alteration permit
preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all
interested persons wishing to speak and at the conclusion of the public hearing and discussion by
the Planning Commission, McGonagill moved, Tietz seconded that the Planning Commission
recommends denial of the rezoning for 191 acres from Rural Residential District (RR) to
Planned Unit Development Residential (PUD-R) including PUD ordinance for Galpin Design
Standards; the wetland alteration permit and the subdivision preliminary plat creating 191 lots,
three outlots and dedication of the right-of-way as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer
Engineering dated December 5, 2018.
Commissioners McGonagill, Tietz and Randall voted in favor of the motion for denial.
Commissioners Madsen, Weick and Aller voted against the motion for denial. The motion tied
with a vote of 3 to 3, and, therefore failed.
On March 5, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public comment meeting. No formal action
was taken.
On March 11, 2019, City Council met and reviewed the proposed development. They reviewed
the testimony from the Planning Commission. The City Council makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Rural Residential District (RR).
2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density (net density
1.2-4.0 units per acre) use. The net density of the PUD is 1.3 units an acre.
3. The city’s Comprehensive Plan has identified the eastern portion of this site (49 acres) as
future park expansion. This development will dedicate these 49 acres as open space.
1
4. The legal description of the property is: (See Exhibit A)
5. The Zoning Ordinance directs the city to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the
proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are:
a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official city
Comprehensive Plansince the zoning is consistent with the land use designation of
the property, preserves significant areas of natural habitat, trees and vegetation,
protects shore landarea, utilizes available infrastructure and provides a variety of
housing opportunities;
b. The proposed use is and will be compatible with the present and future land uses of
the area, which are residential uses to the west, north and south, an arterial roadway to
the west and is buffered from existing single-family homes by distance and
landscaping. The subdivision buffers existing development/homes on the north and
south by matching or exceeding lots sizes and creating a landscape buffer;
c. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning
Ordinance, subject to the conditions of approval for the subdivision and wetland
alteration;
d. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is
proposed since the use is similar to surrounding uses as well as providinga significant
area of permanent open space to be enjoyed by the community, which adds value to
all the homes;
e. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the city's service capacitysince adequate infrastructure is available to the
site; and
f. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the
property. This subdivision will dedicate the necessary right of way for the upgrade of
Galpin Boulevard.
6. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the cityto consider seven (7) possible adverse effects
of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are:
a. The proposed subdivision complies with the zoning ordinance;
b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional
plans including but not limited to the city's Comprehensive Plan;
c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and
stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development;
d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage,
sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the
subdivision ordinance;
e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage;
f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record, but will provide
additional required easements; and
g. The proposed subdivision is not premature since it is providing all required
infrastructure improvements necessary for residential housing as well as improving
2
existing stormwater issues for adjacent properties. A subdivision is premature if any of
the following exists:
1)Lack of adequate stormwater drainage.
2) Lack of adequate roads.
3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems.
7. When approving a Wetland Alteration Permit, the city must determine the capability of a
proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of
the conditional use Sec. 20-232, include the following 12 items:
a. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health,
safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. While
the development impacts several wetlands, the majority of the wetlands (97 percent) are
being preserved and protected. The developer shall mitigate any wetland impacts as
well as preserve significant areas of permanent open space for enjoyment by the
community.
b. The proposed development will be consistent with the objectives of the city's
Comprehensive Plan and the subdivision and zoning ordinances. The developer shall
meet all water quality standards required of it.
c. The proposed residential development will be designed, constructed, operated and
maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing and intended character of
the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. The project
proposes the development of single-family homes, which currently exist to the south,
west and north of this parcel.
d. The proposed development will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned
neighboring uses. The project proposes single-family homes and a significant public
open space.
e. The proposed development will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse
disposal, water and sewer systems and schools and will be served adequately by such
facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsiblefor the
establishment of the proposed use. The developer shall preserve the easterly outlot as
permanent open space.
f. The proposed development will not create excessive requirements for public facilities
and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community, but
will increase the value of the community through the provision of additional housing as
well as a significant public open space.
g. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property
or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare, odors, rodents, or trash since the use is similar to adjacent uses.
h. The proposed development will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not
create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares.
Primary access is provided viafull intersectionsoff of a collector street.
3
i. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar
access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Wetland impacts will be
mitigated. A significant amount of the site will be preserved as permanent open space.
j. The proposed development will be aesthetically compatible with the area.The project
proposes the development of single-family homessimilar to those in the
developments to the north, south and west.
k. The proposed development will not depreciate surrounding property values. The project
proposes the development of residential uses similar to those in the developments to
the north, south and west and will increase the value of the community through the
provision of additional housing as well as a significant public open space.
l. The proposed development will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in
Chapter 20, Articles VI, VII, VIII, XIV - Division 1, XXIII and XXIVof the
Chanhassen City Code.
8. The Planning Report #2019-01 dated January 15, 2019, and updated March 11, 2019,and
prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al, is incorporated herein.
MOTION
The City Council approves the rezoning of the property from Rural Residential District, RR, to
Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD-R; Preliminary Plat approval creating 181 lots
and three outlots; and a Wetland Alteration Permit; and an ordinance amending Chapter 20 of the
City Code, subject to the conditions of the staff report.
th
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 11 day of March, 2019.
BY: BY:
Todd, Gerhardt, City ManagerElise Ryan,Mayor
4
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description:
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County,
Minnesota.
Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County,
Minnesota.
Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County,
Minnesota.
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116,
Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the North Quarter corner of said Section 10; thence South along the North-
South Quarter line of said Section 10 as distance of 409.69 feet; thence West along a line parallel
with the South line of the North Half of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a
distance of 435.76 feet to the centerline of the Excelsior-Shakopee Road; thence Northeasterly
along said centerline a distance of 419.39 feet to the North line of side Section 10; thence East
along the North line of said Section 10 to the point of beginning, all according to the U.S.
Government Survey thereof.
That part of the South half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section
10, Township 116, Range 23 Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of the centerline of
County Road No. 117, also known as Galpin Boulevard, and lying North of the South 186.00
feet of said South half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thereof.
Together with:
That part westerly 183.00 feet of each of the following two tracts:
(1) That part of the South 186.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the
th
Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5
Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also
known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road
and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road).
(2) That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10,
th
Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5 Principal Meridian, lying Easterly
of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and
formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee
Road).
Which lies northerly of lines described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence
on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West, along the North line of
5
said South half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 588.71 feet, to the beginning of the lines
to be described; thence South 65 degrees 37 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 98.69 feet;
thence Northwesterly a distance of 141.37 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the
Southwest having a radius of 180.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 00 minutes 00
seconds, the chord of said curve is 137.77 feet in length and bears North 46 degrees 52 minutes
45 seconds West; thence North 69 degrees 22 minutes 45 seconds West, tangent to said curve a
distance of 40.00 feet and said line there terminating.
g:\\plan\\2019 planning cases\\19-01 galpin site preliminary plat and rezoning pud\\city council 3-11-19\\findings of fact and recommendation cc
approval.docx
6
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
IN RE:
Application of U.S. Home Corporation, DBA Lennar, and Comerica Bank and Trust, NA, for the
Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprise, Inc. for Rezoning, Preliminary Plat
with a Wetland Alteration Permit.
On January 15, 2019, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled
meeting to consider the application of U.S. Home Corporation, DBA Lennar, and Comerica
Bank and Trust, NA, for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprise, Inc. for
a Rezoning from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development – Residential,
PUD-R; Preliminary Plat approval creating 191 lots and three outlots with and approval of a
Wetland Alteration Permit to fill and alter wetlands on site. The Planning Commission
conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning, subdivision and wetland alteration permit
preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all
interested persons wishing to speak and at the conclusion of the public hearing and discussion by
the Planning Commission, McGonagill moved, Tietz seconded that the Planning Commission
recommend denial of the rezoning for 191 acres from Rural Residential District (RR) to Planned
Unit Development Residential (PUD-R) including the PUD ordinance for Galpin Design
Standards; the wetland alteration permit and the subdivision preliminary plat creating 191 lots,
three outlots and dedication of the right-of-way as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer
Engineering dated December 5, 2018.
Commissioners McGonagill, Tietz and Randall voted in favor of the motion for denial.
Commissioners Madsen, Weick and Aller voted against the motion for denial. The motion tied
with a vote of 3 to 3 and, therefore, failed.
On March 5, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public comment meeting. No formal action
was taken.
On March 11, 2019, the City Council met and reviewed the proposed development. They
reviewed the testimony from the Planning Commission. The City Council makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Rural Residential District (RR).
2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density (net density
1.2-4.0 units per acre) use.
3. The legal description of the property is: (See Exhibit A)
1
4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the cityto consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the
proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are:
a.The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has been found to be inconsistent with the official city
Comprehensive Plan since the zoning and resultant cluster development does not
create a homogeneous development with the single-family zoning to the north and
south of the project;
b. The proposed use is not compatible with the present and future land uses of the area
since it consists of cluster housing development, rather than the single-family
residential uses to the west, north and south on 15,000 square foot or larger lots;
c. The proposed use does not conform to all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance for any existing residential zoning categories;
d. The proposed use may not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is
proposed since the use is similar, but not the same as surrounding uses;
e. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the city's service capacity since adequate infrastructure is available to the
site; and
f. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the
property.
5. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the city to consider seven (7) possible adverse effects
of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are:
a. The proposed subdivision does not comply with the zoning ordinance;
b. The proposed subdivision is inconsistent with all applicable city plans including but not
limited to the city's Comprehensive Plan since it does not create a homogeneous
development with the single-family zoning to the north and south of the project;
c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and
stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development;
d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage,
sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the
subdivision ordinance;
e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage;
f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record, but will provide
additional required easements; and
g. The proposed subdivision is not premature since it is providing all required
infrastructure improvements necessary for residential housing as well as improving
existing stormwater issues for adjacent properties. A subdivision is premature if any of
the following exists:
1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage.
2) Lack of adequate roads.
3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems.
2
6. Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the
relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also
allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing and
a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city
has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality
and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more
standard zoning districts. The applicanthas not demonstrated that the city's expectation is
to be realized as evaluated against the following criteria. Planned unit developments are
to encourage the following:
a. Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of
sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, mature trees, creeks,
wetlands, lakes and scenic views.
b. More efficient and effective use of land, open space and public facilities through
mixing of land uses and assembly and development of land in larger parcels.
c. High quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including
both existing and planned. Site planning, landscaping and building architecture
should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community.
d. Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and
along significant corridors within the city.
e. Development that is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
f. Parks and open space. The creation of public open space may be required by the city.
Such park and open space shall be consistent with the comprehensive park plan and
overall trail plan.
g. Provision of housing affordable to all income groups if appropriate within the PUD.
h. Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and sightings
and the clustering of buildings and land uses.
i. Use of traffic management and design techniques including the provision of transit
and pedestrian linkages to reduce the potential for traffic conflicts. Improvements to
area roads and intersections may be required as appropriate. Where appropriate, the
use of transportation demand management strategies may be required within a
project.
7. When approving a Wetland Alteration Permit, the city must determine the capability of a
proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of
the conditional use Sec. 20-232, include the following 12 items:
a. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health,
safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. While
the development impacts several wetlands, the majority of the wetlands (97 percent) are
being preserved and protected. The developer shall mitigate any wetland impacts as
well as preserve significant areas of permanent open space for enjoyment by the
community.
b. The proposed development is inconsistent with the objectives of the city's
Comprehensive Plan and the subdivision and zoning ordinances. The developer shall
meet all water quality standards required of it.
c. The proposed residential development is not designed, constructed, operated and
maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing and intended character of
3
the general vicinity and will change the essential character of that area. The project
proposes the development of single-family homes thatare on smaller lots than
currently exist to the south, west and north of this parcel.
d. The proposed development will not be hazardous, but aredisturbing to existing or
planned neighboring uses. The project proposes single-family homes on smaller lots
than surrounding development.
e. The proposed development will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse
disposal, water and sewer systems and schools and will be served adequately by such
facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the
establishment of the proposed use.
f. The proposed development will not create excessive requirements for public facilities
and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community but
will increase the value of the community through the provision of additional housing as
well as a significant public open space.
g. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property
or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare, odors, rodents, or trash since the use is similar to adjacent uses.
h. The proposed development will have vehicular approaches to the property that do not
create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares.
Primary access is provided via full intersections off of a collector street.
i. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar
access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Wetland impacts will be
mitigated.
j. The proposed development will not be aesthetically compatible with the area since it
consists of lots smaller than adjacent development. The project proposes the
development of single-family homes on smaller lots than to those in the developments
to the north, south and west.
k. The proposed development will not depreciate surrounding property values. The project
proposes the development of residential uses.
l. The proposed development will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in
Chapter 20, Articles VI, VII, VIII, XIV - Division 1, XXIII and XXIV of the
Chanhassen City Code.
8. The Planning Report #2019-01 dated January 15, 2019, and updated March 11, 2019,
prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al, is incorporated herein.
4
MOTION
The City Council deniesthe rezoning of the property from Rural Residential District, RR, to
Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD-R; Preliminary Plat approval creating 181 lots
and three outlots; and aWetland Alteration Permit; and an ordinance amending Chapter 20 of the
City Code.
th
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 11day of March, 2019.
BY: BY:
Todd, Gerhardt, City ManagerElise Ryan, Mayor
5
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description:
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County,
Minnesota.
Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County,
Minnesota.
Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County,
Minnesota.
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116,
Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the North Quarter corner of said Section 10; thence South along the North-
South Quarter line of said Section 10 as distance of 409.69 feet; thence West along a line parallel
with the South line of the North Half of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a
distance of 435.76 feet to the centerline of the Excelsior-Shakopee Road; thence Northeasterly
along said centerline a distance of 419.39 feet to the North line of side Section 10; thence East
along the North line of said Section 10 to the point of beginning, all according to the U.S.
Government Survey thereof.
That part of the South half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section
10, Township 116, Range 23 Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of the centerline of
County Road No. 117, also known as Galpin Boulevard, and lying North of the South 186.00
feet of said South half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thereof.
Together with:
That part westerly 183.00 feet of each of the following two tracts:
(1) That part of the South 186.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the
th
Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5
Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also
known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road
and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road).
(2) That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10,
th
Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5 Principal Meridian, lying Easterly
of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and
formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee
Road).
Which lies northerly of lines described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence
on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West, along the North line of
6
said South half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 588.71 feet, to the beginning of the lines
to be described; thence South 65 degrees 37 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 98.69 feet;
thence Northwesterly a distance of 141.37 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the
Southwest having a radius of 180.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 00 minutes 00
seconds, the chord of said curve is 137.77 feet in length and bears North 46 degrees 52 minutes
45 seconds West; thence North 69 degrees 22 minutes 45 seconds West, tangent to said curve a
distance of 40.00 feet and said line there terminating.
g:\\plan\\2019 planning cases\\19-01 galpin site preliminary plat and rezoning pud\\city council 3-11-19\\findings of fact and recommendation cc
denial.docx
7
Galpin Property
City of Chanhassen
Introduction
U.S. Home Corporation, d/b/a Lennar is proposing to develop Galpin Property (actual
name TBD) in a manner that is sensitive to the environment and surrounding area. With
this Preliminary Plat we are submitting a plan that has taken into account input from
public leaders, staff, and neighbors. Our plan has 191 homes demonstrating how the
property can be developed through the use of a PUD that will offer diversehousing
opportunities and price points accompanied by the preservation of open space.
Background/History
In November 2017 the property was listed for sale by Comerica Bank; Trust NA, as
personal representatives of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park
Enterprises. On several occasions the seller’s agents and members of Lennar have met
with City staff to begin reviewing the zoning standards and the best use for the property.
In May of 2018 U.S. Home Corporation entered into an Option Agreement to purchase
the property.
Property Description
The site consists of approximately 188 acres made up of several tax parcels (PID
25.6900010, 25.6900020, 25.6900030, 25.0100100, and 25.0100200) located in the
Notheast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23. All
buildings have been removed and the property has been vacant for some time. The site
suffers from frequent trespassers that use the property for walking trails.
City Standards
Land Usedesignation
The property is designated for Low Density residential: RSF 1.2-4 units per acre.
Pre-plat – 1.37 DU/Acre
Zoning Classification
The site is currently zoned as Rural Residential with underlying zoningofRSF;
low density residential 1.2-4 units per acre. Our plan requires a zoning change to
PUD to allow flexibility and the relaxation of strict application of the zoning
ordinance in exchange for greater environmental sensitivity and preservation of
open space for public use.At 1.37units per acre ourplan alsofits into the low
range of the RSF density classification.
1
Surrounding Land Uses
Residential developments of varying densities surround the site to the North,
South, and West. To the West, across Galpin is Long Acres which was developed
as a PUD to allow flexibility in design standards. Our primary street connections
appropriately line up with Hunter Drive and Long Acres Drive. Boarding the
property to the North and South are existing neighborhoods zoned RSF. The
existing neighborhoods to the North (Ashling Meadows and Lucy Ridge) provide
road stubs to the subject property. There are no road connections to the South.
Lake Lucy, and Lake Ann and their surrounding wetlands are located to the East.
Plan modifications since initial concept review
Overall
50+ acres designated for City Park
Lot count has been reduced to 191 homesites (1.37 DU/Acre)
Stormwater ponding has been incorporated to accommodate Galpin Rd upgrades
Perimeter buffering has been evaluated
North end
Through street from Galpin to Lucy Ridge has been eliminated
Buffering through preservation has been identified
14 Lots have been eliminated to minimize environmental impacts
South end
Density in Southern 1/3 of the property has decreased
Lots along Southern property line have been enlarged from 55’ wide to 75’ wide to
accommodate standard homes rather than Villa.
Storm sewer and Emergency Overflows have been identified to alleviate water issues in
adjacent neighborhood
Back yard areas along South property line have been expanded allowing for the
preservation of existing trees
Landscape buffering has been integrated into the plan
Open Space Preservation
The City of Chanhassen’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies significant trail
improvements along the Eastern boundary of the property that would enhance the Lake
Ann Park and trail system by completing important connections between Lake Ann, Lake
Lucy and Galpin Road.
Our plan for the Galpin property focuses housing development closer to Galpin and
preserves approximately 50 acres of land adjacent to Lake Lucy and Lake Ann that could
be used for park dedication to the City. By mixing lot sizes our plan strategically places
the 191homes on 88 acres of land giving the opportunity to preserve significantly more
open space for use by the residents of Chanhassen then would be available if strict RSF
2
zoning standards were followed. Preserving the open space in this manner not only
minimizes environmental impacts but also significantly reduces the length of public
infrastructure (sewer, water, roads) required for long term maintenance by the City.
Building Plans/Product Information
Extensive research on housing availability and market conditions within the City of
Chanhassen has guided us in putting together a plan that is matched by a product
portfolio that includes architecturally interesting variety of homes, and price points, that
meet multiple buyer niches.
Landmark Series - Designed with efficiency in mind, the Landmark series meets
the demands of today’s challenging housing market by offering a fantastic value
planned specially for 65’& 75’ wide homesites. Lennar has successfully built the
Landmark series in Reflections at Lake Riley, Boulder Cove, and Camden Ridge.
Typical footprints are 50’ wide allowing the ability to maintain setbacks
designated by zoning standards. A variety of houseplans and elevations make up
this series offering square footages ranging from 2,200 sq ft to 3,200 sq ft plus the
ability to finish the basement to add footage to the home. With families in mind,
the homes typically include four bedrooms, a large open living space on the main
level, a master suite, mud room, and three car garage. Sixty-five foot wide lots
allow the ability to preserve open space without compromising the integrity of the
neighborhood. Typical side yard setbacks will be maintained. An interesting
streetscape will be maintained through the incorporation of a variety of elevations,
materials, and color packages. Lots are arranged in a manner that will include an
assortment of walk-outs, look-outs, and flats. The 75’ wide lots will provide
additional spacing and allow the opportunity to expand certain elevations to
include a four-car garage.
Included in this series are Lennar’sNextGen plans. This revolutionary series is a
multi-generational home plan designed specifically to accommodate generations
living under one roof with privacy and convenience. This truly unique home
highlights the ‘NextGen suite’ that provides a separate first floor living space with
its own entrance, living area, kitchenette, attached garage andlaundryall under
one roof with access to the rest of the home. The result is a 5-bedroom, 5
bathroom home that creatively satisfies a variety of unique housing needs while
fitting into the architectural styling of the neighborhood.
Luxury Villa – The 34Luxury Villa aredesigned for the 55’ wide homesites just
North of the Southern entrance. The LuxuryVilla provides minimal maintenance
housing for an underserved market in Chanhassen; and the Twin Cities in general,
the ‘empty nester’. Designed for single level living, the Villa homes offer a
spacious first floor that includes a master suite, fireplace, open living room,
gourmet kitchen, and study. A deck or three season porch is included with the
home to allow the opportunity to enjoy the natural features of Galpin Property .
Multiple elevations and color packages will be incorporated to reduce monotony.
3
Traditional -The 31 Traditional homesites on the North end of the property are
currently being marketed for sale to custom homebuilders. We are requesting a
lot split that would allow that portion of the site to be developed in the future,
perhaps by another entity. It is recognized the lot split will not release the North
portion of the site from the responsibilities of the overall PUD request. Lennar
ultimately reserves the abilityto participate in development and construction of
homes in that area but does not have the intention to do so at this time.
Environmental Impacts
Wetlands - A wetland delineation was completed on the site in September 2017
and was followed by a Wetland classification analysis. Wetland impacts have
been minimized by careful planning and the preservation of open space.
Following RSF standards for the entire property would require more impact to
existing wetlands for the extension of public infrastructure (sewer, water, streets)
to serve the upland adjacent to Lake Ann and Lake Lucy.
Tree Preservation – Preservation of open space for public use will allow the
opportunity to preserve large wooded areas that may otherwise be disturbed with
development. Tree replacement as required by code has been factored into the
landscape plan. Following the RSF zoning guidelines would have a much greater
impact on the large stands of trees located in the upland areas fronting Lake Ann
and Lake Lucy that are contemplated by Public Park with this plan.
Water Quality – Water quality will be managed through the incorporation of on-
site ponding and other appropriate erosion control measures. We are evaluating
the potential for water re-use on site to supplement irrigation systems. Lennar is
committed to following stormwater policies enacted by the City of Chanhassen
and the Minnesota Pollution Control Association (MPCA). Plans have been
submitted to the Riley Purgatory Watershed to allow for the simultaneous review
of stormwater management designs.
Impervious Surface – Lennar recognizes the importance of managing the runoff
of hard surface areas. To help regulate standards we have created the following
table to set average thresholds for each sized homesite.
Note: A more detailed table specific to each homesite has been provided with the other submission materials.
To help inform customers of these standards Lennar intends to provide each
customer with a copy of their lot certificate that includes the current impervious
4
area, the maximum impervious area allowed, and the remaining impervious area
left for future improvements such as patios, 4-season porches, and pools.
Flexibility through the use of PUD
Our plan requires a zoning change to PUD to allow flexibility and the relaxation of strict
application of the zoning ordinance in exchange for greater environmental sensitivity and
preservation of open space for public use. The items we are requesting flexibility include; lot
width and area, cul de sac length, and relaxation of front setbacks along the North and South
boarders. All three items are requested for consideration to allow for the preservation of
open space and trees.
Homeowners Association(s)
A Master Homeowners Association will be established to maintain private common areas
and community monuments. A Sub-Association will be created to take care of the
common elements within the Villa area. The Villa will be ‘full maintenance’ in nature to
include; professional management, mowing, plowing, and exterior upkeep of the homes.
Owners of single family homes will be responsible for their own upkeep and maintenance
subject to City Ordinance and Architectural Controls established within the Master
Association.
Summary
Lennar has a long history of building successful Communities in the City of Chanhassen
under the names Lennar, Ryland, Lundgren Bros. Construction, and Orrin Thompson
Homes. We are very excited for the opportunity that lends itself through the careful
development of this fantastic property and ask for your support.
(US Home/Lennar)
Galpin Property – 191 Gross Acres
Total Homesites – 191
Approximate Developed Area – 89 acres
Open Space – 50 acres
Preserved wetlands – 49 acres
Traditional homesites – 31
Average Lot – 90’ wide
Landmark Homesites – 126
Average Lot – 65’ wide -115
75’ wide -11
Villa Homesites – 34
Average Lot – 55’ wide
5
Project Team
Developer: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar
Builder: Lennar Corporation
Primary Contact: Joe Jablonski
Planner/Engineer/Surveyor: Pioneer Engineering
Geotechnical Engineer: Braun Intertec
Wetland Specialist: Midwest Natural Resources, Inc.
Landscape Architect: Pioneer Engineering
Legal Council: Vantage Law Group
Association Manager: TBD
6
HBMQJO!QSPQFSUZ
DPNQMJBODF!UBCMF
Mpu!Xjeui!Mpu!Efqui!Jnqfswjpvt!Bsfb!
Mpu!Bsfb!)TG*)Gffu*)Gffu*)TG*
Mpu
:1!gu!MputQVE26-111:12366-611
:1!gu!Mput!!!!QVE++22-361:12366-611
76!gu!MputQVE9-561762365-511
GspouTjef!Zbse!Dpsofs
TfucbdlSfbs!TfucbdlTfucbdlTfucbdlDS!228!Tfucbdl
:1!gu!Mput!!!31!gu!+36!gu8/6!gu31!gu61!gu
76!gu!Mput!36!gu!36!gu8/6!gu31!gu61!gu
Xfumboe!Cvggfs!Tfucbdl!31!gu/
+!36!gu!xjui!Tjefxbml
++Mput!212.222
Mpu!Xjeui!Mpu!Efqui!Jnqfswjpvt!Bsfb!
Mpu!Bsfb!)TG*)Gffu*)Gffu*)TG*
:1!gu!MputMpu
50118,0921001775,500
50217,455901675,500
50315,030901675,500
50422,829902495,500
50524,572902495,500
50616,733901755,500
50718,427902015,500
50817,037901425,500
50923,848901595,500
51020,017901375,500
51118,801901565,500
51217,844901675,500
51315,032901675,500
51415,030901675,500
51516,6671001675,500
51615,574901755,500
51715,514901755,500
51815,482901745,500
51915,576901745,500
52015,300901705,500
52115,300901705,500
52215,300901705,500
52315,440901725,500
52415,882901685,500
52516,629901365,500
52622,359901405,500
52727,426901435,500
52816,764901605,500
52915,371901655,500
53044,983901655,500
53147,788901255,500
Mpu!Xjeui!Mpu!Efqui!Jnqfswjpvt!Bsfb!
Mpu!Bsfb!)TG*)Gffu*)Gffu*)TG*
:1!gu!MputMpu
10119,8971351435,500
10213,371901485,500
10313,297901485,500
10413,297901485,500
10513,297901485,500
10613,297901485,500
10713,297901485,500
10813,297901485,500
10914,599901485,500
11014,840901485,500
11125,529901485,500
Mpu!Xjeui!Mpu!Efqui!Jnqfswjpvt!Bsfb!
Mpu!Bsfb!)TG*)Gffu*)Gffu*)TG*
76!gu!MputMpu
3019,993781254,400
3028,450651254,400
3038,450651254,400
3048,450651254,400
3058,450651254,400
3068,450651254,400
30711,132651254,400
30813,748781314,400
3098,925651294,400
31012,282651264,400
3118,607651254,400
3128,126651254,400
3138,257651254,400
3148,795651304,400
3159,683651424,400
31612,836781254,400
31712,591781504,400
31810,414651454,400
31910,228651454,400
32011,448651454,400
32113,180651474,400
32212,052651454,400
32311,853651424,400
32410,767651424,400
3259,524651394,400
3269,135651324,400
3278,609651324,400
3288,609651324,400
32910,232651324,400
3309,750651254,400
3319,478651254,400
33210,900651254,400
33316,107781254,400
33411,215781364,400
33510,404651534,400
33611,607651674,400
33710,622651424,400
33811,545651334,400
33914,532651254,400
34012,761651254,400
34113,019651254,400
34210,858651254,400
34310,887651634,400
34410,502651524,400
3459,306651344,400
34610,263781254,400
34710,020781254,400
3489,385651354,400
34910,984651544,400
35010,228651264,400
3518,474651264,400
3528,474651254,400
3538,776651254,400
3548,864651254,400
35513,586651314,400
35614,313651304,400
35712,790651324,400
35812,963651254,400
35914,449651454,400
36011,360651264,400
36111,011781254,400
36210,508651424,400
36311,458651454,400
36413,033651304,400
36512,790651304,400
36612,940651324,400
36712,790651304,400
3689,728651314,400
36910,036651404,400
37010,303781254,400
3718,933651304,400
3729,242651304,400
3739,242651304,400
3749,242651304,400
3759,236651304,400
3768,450651304,400
3778,450651304,400
3788,450651304,400
3798,450651304,400
3808,450651304,400
3818,801651304,400
38215,319951304,400
38311,772781454,400
3849,453651454,400
3859,780651454,400
3869,898651344,400
3879,263651304,400
3888,450651304,400
3898,450651304,400
3908,450651304,400
3918,450651304,400
3928,450651304,400
3938,749651304,400
3949,189651304,400
3959,390651304,400
3969,313651304,400
3978,922651344,400
39812,754781304,400
3998,474651304,400
4008,450651304,400
4018,450651304,400
4028,450651304,400
4038,450651304,400
4048,450651304,400
40510,504651304,400
40611,092651304,400
4078,819651304,400
4088,450651304,400
4098,729651304,400
41012,658781314,400
41110,192781274,400
4129,559651274,400
4139,104651454,400
4149,702651374,400
41514,151651354,400
4169,676651354,400
4178,779651304,400
4188,570651304,400
4199,103651364,400
4209,344651434,400
4219,170651434,400
42210,929781324,400
42312,265781424,400
4249,984651304,400
42510,465651304,400
42611,434651594,400
42712,108651704,400
42812,591651784,400
42912,589651784,400
43012,101651704,400
43110,764651304,400
4329,554651304,400
43311,046781284,400
43412,618651414,400
43514,656652124,400
43614,357652484,400
43714,285652484,400
43813,661652004,400
43912,931651344,400
Mpu!Xjeui!Mpu!Efqui!Jnqfswjpvt!Bsfb!
Mpu!Bsfb!)TG*)Gffu*)Gffu*)TG*
66!gu!MputMpu
20111,262551153,400
2028,851551483,400
2038,645551463,400
2048,659551463,400
2058,894551493,400
2069,079551563,400
2079,043551653,400
2088,470551323,400
20913,623551153,400
21010,635551373,400
21111,580551393,400
21210,688551323,600
21313,820551243,600
2149,059551643,400
2157,285551323,400
2167,285551323,400
2177,488551333,400
2189,065551313,400
2198,605551243,400
2206,824551223,400
2217,222551403,400
2228,456551683,400
22311,920551763,400
22410,548551283,400
2257,164551313,400
2269,284551273,600
2278,832551263,600
2286,875551253,400
2296,875551253,400
2306,875551253,400
2316,875551253,400
2326,875551253,400
2337,651551263,400
23410,745551423,400
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Wbmfodjb!
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
B
C
D
E
MFOOBS/DPN
:63.35:.4111
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Wbmfodjb!
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
2-647!Tr/!Gu/!
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!
sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!
eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!
xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!
Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf!bhsffnfou!gps!
bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!
Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!
ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!
ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!
sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!bsf!
opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!
sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!
xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!
trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!
opu!cf!vtfe!bt!sfqsftfoubujpo!pg!uif!ipnft!
qsfdjtf!ps!bduvbm!tj{f/!Boz!tubufnfou-!wfscbm!
pg!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!tj{f!pg!boz!ipnf!jt!
b!tipsuiboe!eftdsjqujpo!pg!uif!nboofs!jo!
xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!
tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!
Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!
boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!
Mfoobs/dpn!ps!tff!b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!
Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!
mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!
xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!
qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!3126!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!
Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!
Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!
Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!
tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!
Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!
Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!
!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!
Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!
Mjd!$!CD112524/)27854*!507028
Nbjo!Mfwfm
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!
711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
MFOOBS/DPN
:63.35:.4111
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Wbmfodjb!
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
Pqujpot
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf
!bhsffnfou!
gps!bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!
dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!
bsf!opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!vtfe!bt!
sfqsftfoubujpo!
uif!nboofs!jo!xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!Mfoobs/dpn!
ps!tff!
b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!31
26!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!
tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!Mjd!$!CD112524/)27854*!507028
:63.35:.4111
MFOOBS/DPN
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Wbmfodjb!
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
Pqujpobm!Gjojtife!Cbtfnfou
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf
!bhsffnfou!
gps!bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!
dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!
bsf!opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!vtfe!bt!
sfqsftfoubujpo!
uif!nboofs!jo!xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!Mfoobs/dpn!
ps!tff!
b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!31
26!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!
tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!Mjd!$!CD112524/)27854*!507028
:63.35:.4111
MFOOBS/DPN
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Pygpse
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
B
C
D
E
MFOOBS/DPN
:63.35:.4111
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Pygpse
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
2-652!Tr/!Gu/!
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!
sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!
eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!
xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!
Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf!bhsffnfou!gps!
bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!
Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!
ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!
ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!
sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!bsf!
opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!
sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!
xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!
trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!
opu!cf!vtfe!bt!sfqsftfoubujpo!pg!uif!ipnft!
qsfdjtf!ps!bduvbm!tj{f/!Boz!tubufnfou-!wfscbm!
pg!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!tj{f!pg!boz!ipnf!jt!
b!tipsuiboe!eftdsjqujpo!pg!uif!nboofs!jo!
xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!
tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!
Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!
boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!
Mfoobs/dpn!ps!tff!b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!
Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!
mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!
xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!
qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!3126!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!
Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!
Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!
Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!
tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!
Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!
Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!
!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!
Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!
Mjd!$!CD112524/)27858*!507028
Nbjo!Mfwfm
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!
711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
MFOOBS/DPN
:63.35:.4111
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Pygpse
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
Pqujpot
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf
!bhsffnfou!
gps!bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!
dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!
bsf!opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!vtfe!bt!
sfqsftfoubujpo!
uif!nboofs!jo!xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!Mfoobs/dpn!
ps!tff!
b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!31
26!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!
tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!Mjd!$!CD112524/)27858*!507028
:63.35:.4111
MFOOBS/DPN
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Pygpse
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
Pqujpobm!Cbtfnfou
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf
!bhsffnfou!
gps!bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!
dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!
bsf!opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!vtfe!bt!
sfqsftfoubujpo!
uif!nboofs!jo!xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!Mfoobs/dpn!
ps!tff!
b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!31
26!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!
tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!Mjd!$!CD112524/)27858*!507028
:63.35:.4111
MFOOBS/DPN
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Cvdljohibn
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
2-:41!Tr/!Gu/!
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!
sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!
eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!
xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!
Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf!bhsffnfou!gps!
bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!
Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!
ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!
ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!
sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!bsf!
opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!
sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!
xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!
trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!
opu!cf!vtfe!bt!sfqsftfoubujpo!pg!uif!ipnft!
qsfdjtf!ps!bduvbm!tj{f/!Boz!tubufnfou-!wfscbm!
pg!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!tj{f!pg!boz!ipnf!jt!
b!tipsuiboe!eftdsjqujpo!pg!uif!nboofs!jo!
xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!
tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!
Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!
boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!
Mfoobs/dpn!ps!tff!b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!
Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!
mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!
xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!
qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!3126!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!
Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!
Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!
Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!
tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!
Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!
Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!
!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!
Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!
Mjd!$!CD112524/)27857*!507028
Nbjo!Mfwfm
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!
711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
MFOOBS/DPN
:63.35:.4111
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Cvdljohibn
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
B
C
D
E
MFOOBS/DPN
:63.35:.4111
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Cvdljohibn
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
Pqujpot
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf
!bhsffnfou!
gps!bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!
dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!
bsf!opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!vtfe!bt!
sfqsftfoubujpo!
uif!nboofs!jo!xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!Mfoobs/dpn!
ps!tff!
b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!31
26!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!
tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!Mjd!$!CD112524/)27857*!507028
:63.35:.4111
MFOOBS/DPN
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Cvdljohibn
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
Pqujpobm!Cbtfnfou
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf
!bhsffnfou!
gps!bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!
dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!
bsf!opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!vtfe!bt!
sfqsftfoubujpo!
uif!nboofs!jo!xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!Mfoobs/dpn!
ps!tff!
b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!31
26!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!
tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!Mjd!$!CD112524/)27857*!507028
:63.35:.4111
MFOOBS/DPN
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Cbsdfmpob
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
2-742!!Tr/!Gu/!
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!
sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!
eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!
xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!
Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf!bhsffnfou!gps!
bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!
Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!
ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!
ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!
sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!bsf!
opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!
sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!
xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!
trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!
opu!cf!vtfe!bt!sfqsftfoubujpo!pg!uif!ipnft!
qsfdjtf!ps!bduvbm!tj{f/!Boz!tubufnfou-!wfscbm!
pg!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!tj{f!pg!boz!ipnf!jt!
b!tipsuiboe!eftdsjqujpo!pg!uif!nboofs!jo!
xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!
tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!
Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!
boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!
Mfoobs/dpn!ps!tff!b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!
Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!
mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!
xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!
qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!3126!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!
Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!
Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!
Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!
tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!
Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!
Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!
!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!
Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!
Mjd!$!CD112524/)27855*!50728
Nbjo!Mfwfm
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!
711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
MFOOBS/DPN
:63.35:.4111
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Cbsdfmpob
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
B
C
D
E
MFOOBS/DPN
:63.35:.4111
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Cbsdfmpob
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
Pqujpot
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf
!bhsffnfou!
gps!bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!
dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!
bsf!opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!vtfe!bt!
sfqsftfoubujpo!
uif!nboofs!jo!xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!Mfoobs/dpn!
ps!tff!
b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!31
26!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!
tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!Mjd!$!CD112524/)27855*!50728
:63.35:.4111
MFOOBS/DPN
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Cbsdfmpob
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
Pqujpobm!Gjojtife!Cbtfnfou
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf
!bhsffnfou!
gps!bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!
dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!
bsf!opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!vtfe!bt!
sfqsftfoubujpo!
uif!nboofs!jo!xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!Mfoobs/dpn!
ps!tff!
b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!31
26!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!
tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!Mjd!$!CD112524/)27855*!50728
:63.35:.4111
MFOOBS/DPN
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Csjhiupo
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
2-75:!Tr/!Gu/!
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!
sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!
eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!
xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!
Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf!bhsffnfou!gps!
bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!
Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!
ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!
ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!
sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!bsf!
opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!
sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!
xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!
trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!
opu!cf!vtfe!bt!sfqsftfoubujpo!pg!uif!ipnft!
qsfdjtf!ps!bduvbm!tj{f/!Boz!tubufnfou-!wfscbm!
pg!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!tj{f!pg!boz!ipnf!jt!
b!tipsuiboe!eftdsjqujpo!pg!uif!nboofs!jo!
xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!
tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!
Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!
boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!
Mfoobs/dpn!ps!tff!b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!
Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!
mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!
xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!
qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!3126!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!
Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!
Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!
Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!
tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!
Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!
Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!
!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!
Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!
Mjd!$!CD112524/)27856*!507028
Nbjo!Mfwfm
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!
711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
MFOOBS/DPN
:63.35:.4111
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Csjhiupo
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
B
C
D
E
MFOOBS/DPN
:63.35:.4111
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Csjhiupo
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
Pqujpot
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf
!bhsffnfou!
gps!bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!
dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!
bsf!opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!vtfe!bt!
sfqsftfoubujpo!
uif!nboofs!jo!xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!Mfoobs/dpn!
ps!tff!
b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!31
26!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!
tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!Mjd!$!CD112524/)27856*!507028
:63.35:.4111
MFOOBS/DPN
¯
MFOOBS
Uif!Csjhiupo
WJMMB!DPMMFDUJPO
Pqujpobm!Cbtfnfou
27416!47ui!Bwf/!O/!!Tvjuf!711-!Qmznpvui-!NO!66557
Fmfwbujpot!pg!b!ipnf!nbz!wbsz!boe!xf!sftfswf!uif!sjhiu!up!tvctujuvuf!boe!0ps!npejgz!eftjho!boe!nbufsjbmt-!jo!pvs!tpmf!pqjojpo!boe!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Qmfbtf!tff!zpvs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!boe!ipnf!qvsdibtf
!bhsffnfou!
gps!bduvbm!gfbuvsft!eftjhobufe!bt!bo!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!gfbuvsf-!beejujpobm!jogpsnbujpo-!ejtdmptvsft-!boe!ejtdmbjnfst!sfmbujoh!up!zpvs!ipnf!boe!jut!gfbuvsft/!Qmbot!bsf!bsujtut!sfoefsjoht!boe!nbz!
dpoubjo!pqujpot!xijdi!
bsf!opu!tuboebse!po!bmm!npefmt/!Mfoobs!sftfswft!uif!sjhiu!up!nblf!dibohft!up!qmbot!boe!fmfwbujpot!xjuipvu!qsjps!opujdf/!Tubufe!ejnfotjpot!boe!trvbsf!gppubhf!bsf!bqqspyjnbuf!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!vtfe!bt!
sfqsftfoubujpo!
uif!nboofs!jo!xijdi!uif!trvbsf!gppubhf!xbt!ftujnbufe!boe!tipvme!opu!cf!dpotusvfe!up!joejdbuf!dfsubjouz/!Hbsbhf!tj{ft!nbz!wbsz!gspn!ipnf!up!ipnf!boe!nbz!opu!bddpnnpebuf!bmm!wfijdmft/!Wjtju!Mfoobs/dpn!
ps!tff!
b!Mfoobs!Ofx!Ipnf!Dpotvmubou!gps!gvsuifs!efubjmt!boe!jnqpsubou!mfhbm!ejtdmbjnfst/!Uijt!jt!opu!bo!pggfs!jo!tubuft!xifsf!qsjps!sfhjtusbujpo!jt!sfrvjsfe/!Wpje!xifsf!qspijcjufe!cz!mbx/!Tpvsdf!.!CBUD-!31
26!Upq!
36!Cvjmefst!Mjtu/!Dpqzsjhiu!ª!3128!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo/!Bmm!sjhiut!sftfswfe/!Mfoobs-!uif!Mfoobs!mphp-!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!boe!uif!Fwfszuijoht!Jodmvefe!mphp!bsf!V/T/!sfhjtufsfe!tfswjdf!nbslt!ps!
tfswjdf!nbslt!pg!Mfoobs!Dpsqpsbujpo!boe0ps!jut!tvctjejbsjft/!V/T/!Ipnf!Dpsqpsbujpo!e0c0b!Mfoobs!!Mjdfotf!Op/!31575982/!Mfoobs!Tbmft!Dpsq/!!Csplfs/!NO!Cmes/!Mjd!$!CD112524/)27856*!507028
:63.35:.4111
MFOOBS/DPN
/ğƩǝĻƩ /ƚǒƓƷǤ
tǒĬƌźĭ ƚƩƉƭ
ЊЊЌЏЉ IźŭŷǞğǤ ЋЊЋͲ {ǒźƷĻ Њ
/ƚƌƚŭƓĻͲ ab ЎЎЌЋЋ
December 28, 2018
City of Chanhassen,
c/o Paul Oehme, P.E.
Public Works Director/City Engineer
952-227-1169
poehme@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Re: Development / Access Review Comments: Nelson Property Preliminary Plat on CR
117/Galpin Blvd.
Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject development in the City of Chanhassen. Consistent
with the County Comprehensive Plan and County Codes, the following are comments and recommended
conditions of approval and as potential requirements for any necessary permits to be issued for the
project:
1. The subject plat and development has been reviewed against several other major planning
and infrastructure projects, with the result that several changes and/or cross-checks of the
subject plat will be required. CR 117/Galpin Blvd. is planned as turn back project and studied
as part of a Highway 117 Corridor Study. Galpin Blvd is also
Comprehensive Plan as an Urban/Urbanizing Collector, with a guided access spacing of 1/4-
mile full access and 1/8-mile secondary access. In addition, a draft master stormwater and
pond management was developed, based on planned development and road design
elements.
2. In terms of access management, the proposed accesses across from Hunter Dr. and
Longacres Dr. meet the guideline for full access. These two access points are also identified
in the Highway 117 Corridor Study for full access.
3. In terms of access management, the access across from Wynsong Ln. meets the 1/8 spacing
guideline for a secondary access. Note that this access could be restricted to a right-in/right-
out access in the future. As such, it is recommended the City and developer consider a local
through road connection instead of the proposed cul-de-sac. As a condition of the secondary
access across from Wynsong Ln, the driveway from parcel no. 250100400 will need to be
removed from CR 117/Galpin Blvd. and connect to the proposed new local road.
4. Exclusive left turn and right turn lanes should be required at all full access points across from
Hunter Dr. and Longacres Dr., and if full access allowed at Wynsong Ln. Left turn lanes are
preferred over right turn lanes if space is a premium. These are shown conceptually in the
preferred alternative from the Highway 117 Corridor Study. The Hunter Drive location looks
like it will need additional right of way and / or special design transitions to the south to fit
the recommended turn lane lengths and transition tapers.
DBSWFS!DPVOUZ!
hŅŅźĭĻ ΛВЎЋΜ ЍЏЏΏЎЋЉЉ Cğǣ ΛВЎЋΜ ЍЏЏΏЎЋЋЌ ǞǞǞ͵ĭƚ͵ĭğƩǝĻƩ͵ƒƓ͵ǒƭ
5. Right of way dedication will be required along the east side of CR 117/Galpin Blvd. per the
above considerations, the Highway 117 Corridor Study, and the typical roadway sections
. The Corridor Study identifies
specific right of way needs and the plat will need to follow and be consistent with the
preferred roadway alternative. The right of way will need to tie into the existing highway
right of way north and south of the proposed development. The preliminary and final
proposal will need to be reviewed and approved as to form and content by the County
Surveyor.
Specifically, given that most all of the existing corridor is platted at approximately 100-ft total
right of way could also be a total of 100 ft total or 50-ft on center. The
typical roadway section for a 2-lane urban undivided with continuous left turn lane
(intersection) should be followed and revised to fit in the 100-ft right of way planned, with an
exact cross-section to be reviewed and approved by the County and City.
The recommended cross-section could run as follows from west to east: 1--trail-5-
-----left turn lane; 12-thru
---gutter; 5--trail; 1-offset (with variations in
offset and/or blvd). Potentially, the right turn lanes could be shared Thru/Right Turn Lanes
as exclusive left turn lanes are preferred over right turn lanes if space is a premium.
It could be that the left turn lane or center left turn lane could be left out of the section
Wetland is existing to keep the road narrower in this section. From the
Corridor Study centerline stationing reference numbers, it looks like the typical left turn lane
is about 600-800-feet long, such that the LT lane at Hunter Drive falls at Sta 32+00 to Sta
40+00; and the LT lane at Longacres Dr falls at Sta 40+00 to Sta 48+00; and so on to the
north. More exact design layouts can verify some of these details.
6. The technical details of the plat, its boundaries and form(s) will need to be reviewed and
approved by the County Surveyor.
7. The s final grading plans, ponds, and right of way along CR 117/Galpin Blvd. will need to
be reviewed and approved to show how this is set up for the potential future CR 117/Galpin
Blvd. reconstruction. A cross reference of grading plans, profiles, and respective cross
sections should be provided at key locations such as intersections, ponds, or other special
features.
8. A new a draft master stormwater and pond management will need to be developed for this
plat and area, based on planned development, road design elements, and the draft ponds
planned
will need to be verified accordingly.
9. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way, the applicant
shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility or
Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) from Carver County Public Works:
(http://www.co.carver.mn.us/how-do-i/apply-for/a-permit). Final details of locations, grades,
and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed
and approved prior to any permits.
Ћ tğŭĻ
10. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on County highways from current or
approved conditions will need to remedied or updated at development expense, including
costs incurred by the County.
These are comments at this time. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not
hesitate to contact me at dmccormick@co.carver.mn.us or by phone at (952) 466-5208.
Sincerely,
Dan McCormick, P.E. PTOE
Transportation Manager
Carver County Public Works
Ќ tğŭĻ
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Galpin Property - In Opposition to the PUD
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:07:59 AM
From: Danlye Jones <danlye@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 9:29 PM
To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Galpin Property - In Opposition to the PUD
Dear CouncilMembers & My Fellow Chanhassen Citizens,
Thank you for your efforts to gather public opinion regarding the proposed development of the
Galpin property.
I would like the city to preserve the Galpin property and I oppose the PUD. My husband and I
have called Chanhassen home for 11 years. We are raising our little girl here. I grew up
swimming and fishing at Lake Ann during summerswhile visiting my grandmother long
before this was my home. This land needs to stay pristine to preserve our city's treasure, Lake
Ann, for my child, your children, and future generations.
Prince wasa fan of Joni Mitchell. When I think about the land being developed, I think of her
song lyrics "Don't it always seem to go, that you don't know what you got 'til it's gone". Let's
not pave paradise. We can do the right thing and preserve this land for us and for generations
to come.
Thank you,
Danlye Jones
7026 Pima Ln
Chanhassen, MN 55317
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Galpin Property PUD - Oppose
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:31:18 AM
From: Becca Brandt <becca.brandt@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 8:25 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Fwd: Galpin Property PUD - Oppose
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Becca Brandt<becca.brandt@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:23 AM
Subject: Galpin Property PUD - Oppose
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us <council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>,
kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.is <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.is>
Hello -
Me and my family recently moved to Chanhassen (7601 Walnut Curve) from Minneapolis.
The appeal of the area and the community was and is the trees, open land, park space, and
nature that surrounds us.
Please reject the PUD plan. The high density in this community would instantaneously and
permanently eliminate the appeal that brought us here.
Becca Swanson
--
Becca Brandt
--
Becca Brandt
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Galpin Site Preliminary Plat & Rezone PUD
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:08:33 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
From: matthew.myers@mchsi.com <matthew.myers@mchsi.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 9:04 PM
To: Ryan, Elise <ERyan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Coleman, Julia <JColeman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>;
Campion, Dan <DCampion@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; McDonald, Jerry
<JMcDonald@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Tjornhom, Bethany <BTjornhom@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Galpin Site Preliminary Plat & Rezone PUD
Dear Mayor Ryan and the Chanhassen City Council,
I urge the council to reject the current PUD and density transfer. The PRN Galpin property is
unique piece of land.
It is the only remaining virtually untouched land of hills and wetlands left in the City of
Chanhassen.
There are many more acres of farmland that could be developed into housing subdivisions.
The topography has been changed and the trees stripped from the farm land
The PRN Galpin property was never farmed because of its topography and wetlands.
These features also make the land less than ideal for a housing sub division on the scale of the
current proposal.
I am not opposed to the development because of the proximity to my house. I oppose it on
behalf of the future citizens of Chanhassen.
I want people in 2069 to look back and praise the foresight of the City of Chanhassen for
saving the entire piece of land and thus keeping Lake Ann clear.
I worry about the wildlife that survive in the wetlands and woods. While the PUD saves the
wetlands down by the lake, it destroys the wetlands and the trees on the south hill.
The Lennar plan clearly shows streets laid right on top of a wetland.
The property has been a de facto nature preserve for more than a decade.
There is an abundance of wildlife on the site that would be displaced or wiped out.
There are deer, coyotes, turkeys, opossums, and at least 5 different types of woodpeckers
There is a pair of pheasants that have nested on the south hill for at least the last 3 years.
The decision before you on Monday will affect Chanhassen for decades.
I know the PRN Estate andLennar have timelines, however, that does not mean the citizens
and elected officials of Chanhassen have to meet those deadlines.
I urge the council to reexamine the Comprehensive Plan and find a better use of the land. Be
creative and innovative.
Reach out to othergovernmental bodies and create a partnership for the purchase and long-
term preservation of the land.
Please put a referendum to the vote of the citizens of Chanhassen, the people you were elected
to serve.
No future City council will be able to make a decision like this one. This type of land will not
exist any more in Chanhassen for the City to step in and save for future generations.
I respectfully ask you to do your duty to serve and preserve Chanhassen.
Sincerely,
Matthew Myers
7421 Windmill Drive
Chanhassen MN
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Galpin Site PUD
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:08:51 AM
Attachments:8581.910000182688
From: Daly Myers <daly.myers@mchsi.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 8:44 PM
To: Ryan, Elise <ERyan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Coleman, Julia <JColeman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>;
Campion, Dan <DCampion@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; McDonald, Jerry
<JMcDonald@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Tjornhom, Bethany <BTjornhom@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Galpin Site PUD
My favorite book is "The Lorax" by Dr Seuss. I wanted my mother to read it to me every
night.
The final message of the book is:
"Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not."
I urge each city council member to read this book prior to voting on the destruction of the tress
and land on Galpin Blvd.
Daly S. Myers
Chanhassen MN
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Galpin/Lennar development
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:32:59 AM
From: Hoffman, Todd <thoffman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 8:32 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: Steckling, Jean <jsteckling@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: FW: Galpin/Lennar development
From: Lynne PILGRIM <lpilg@msn.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 8:26 PM
To: Hoffman, Todd <thoffman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Fwd: Galpin/Lennar development
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Lynne PILGRIM <lpilg@msn.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 8:32:16 PM EDT
Subject: Fwd: Galpin/Lennar development
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: LPILG@msn.com
Date: March 10, 2019 at 8:15:57 PM EDT
To:eryan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Cc: dcampion@ci.chanhassen.mn.us,
jcoleman@cichanhassen.mn.us, jmcdonald@ci.chanhassen.mn.us,
btjornhom@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Galpin/Lennar development
Good evening Mayor Ryan and Chanhassen City council members,
Tomorrow night is a major council meeting for many Chanhassen
residents. It is always difficult toface the reality that the area you
moved your family to and now call home will greatly change in the
near future. Those of us who moved here years ago bought our
homes that were surrounded by farms, woods, lakes andother scenic
views. Our children played in these areas. We loved the silence and
the peace these areas offered us. We walked the paths through the
woods and around the water. We appreciated the beauty of the land.
However, we were always aware that those areas could and would be
developed some day. That was the future for Chanhassen.
Our one hope was that we could help to choose the best type of
development. As you are aware, Chanhassen Estates fought the first
ideas on the land to the west. We did not want a Mobil home park or
slab homes. What was finally approved was a neighborhood of
single family homes. Likewise our neighborhood joined with Eden
Prairie to fight the Hennepin County idea for a garbage dump on
what is now the Wynfield neighborhood, just off Dell Road. That
area instead became a lovely area of family homes. Our voices were
heard but we always accepted the fact that our voices could only
express dislike to a point and that development would happen. We
just wanted the best for our area and for Chanhassen in general.
The Chanhassen city council has a purchase agreement with an
opportunity to gain a great addition of 54 acres to our park land. The
builder can do as its chooses without the city picking a plan that helps
allresidents of thecity. It is very narrow minded of a neighborhood
to think it can choose what is best for everyone in our town. We are
a great community with people from all areas and economic
backgrounds. We need to look for what is best for everyone, not just
one special area. The city is not buying the land. Aprivate party is
not buying the land. The neighborhood is not buying the land. A
developer has apurchase agreement on the land. Let’s work with the
developer and accept what is best for everyone In Chanhassen. Let’s
supportthe plan that includes 54 lovely areas for everyone to share
and enjoy.
Lynne and Ron Pilgrim
8026Dakota Ave
612-202-1632
Sent from my iPad
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Please reject the PUD and density transfer
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:08:12 AM
From: Christine Butterfield <cmcbutterfield@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 9:06 PM
To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Aanenson, Kate
<kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Please reject the PUD and density transfer
Mayor Ryan and Chanhassen City Council,
We are urging you to reject the current PUD you are scheduled to vote on tomorrow. This is
not what the residents of Chanhassen want. There are so many more options beside the few
thatLennar is providing. We realize they are trying to negotiate with gifting a portion of the
land to the City. Theexchange is dense housing, clearing beautiful big woods, rolling hills,
and displacing more wildlife. In the short 6 years we have lived in Chanhassen, we have
watched this same thing happen in our back yard withthe development on Lakeway Dr and
Anthem in the Park on the north side of Lake Lucy.
We movedhere from Eden Prairie and while we loved coming to this community, we feel it
lacks walking trails that don't run along a road and housing developments. We lived near
Starring Lake and the trails around that lake are amazing and highly used. We are now facing
a once in a lifetime opportunity to potentially capture a similar setting as Starring Lake. I
believe manycitizens would agree.
Has there been discussions about the City potentially buying a portion of this land around the
lakes? Has the City talked to a spokesperson from Prince's estate regarding a discount on the
land in exchange for an added memorial for Prince on the property? Another place the Prince
fans from all over the world can go and enjoy while they also visit Paisley Park? They not
only see the inside of his home, but also can see the beauty of the landscaping where Prince
called his home? What are the options on voting for a referendum, or applying for a loan?
This would allowfor a developer to pay less for their portion of land and could comply with
the 2040 Comprehensive plan. Please don't allow Lennar to turn our beautiful land into
another cookie-cutter dense housing subdivision. The City just approved a large apartment
building in the middle of downtown. We don't need more dense housing, we need less.
We appreciate all the work you do and know it's not an easy job. We urge you to please work
a little harder to make this development great.
Thank you,
Christine and Jason Butterfield
6626 Pointe Lake Lucy
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Prince"s property on Galpin
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:06:35 AM
From: K B <kabl1@msn.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 8:38 PM
To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Aanenson, Kate
<kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Prince's property on Galpin
Hi,
I live in Chanhassen and have lived in Chanhassen for 23 yrs. I am concerned about the
developement of Prince's property on Galpin Blvd.
I reviewed both proposed options, PUD and Concept plan. The Propsed PUD is better than the
concept plan but neither is acceptable. We need to leave areas such as this for wildlife. All
pieces of land do not need to be developed. I moved to Chanhassen originally because of
more open spaces and now that is becoming less and less. Prince owned this land for many
years possibly to keep it as is, not to be developed. Think of what he would have liked.
Develop a park for everyone to enjoy as a wild area.
Please make the right decision in this and hear what the community is saying. Do not develop
this land because someone wants their profit. Think of what is right. Think about/research
what developing this land will do to the lakes, such as runoff from fertilizer, chemicals, etc.
We need green areas, trees, especially old growth forests for future generations to come and
enjoy. I seen to much of this destroyed over the years, beautiful areas, old oak trees, replaced
with a housing community, one example housing development on Lyman Blvd years ago to
the current development around the lake off Lyman and 101, and many more.
Thank You,
Karen Blenker
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: PRN Galpin Property
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:07:37 AM
-----Original Message-----
From: Dake Chatfield <dake.chatfield@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 7:34 AM
To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: PRN Galpin Property
Dear Mayor Ryan and City Council members,
My name is Dake Chatfield and I live at 2200 Majestic Way in Chanhassen. I border the south side of the proposed
development property in the Royal Oaks neighborhood. My family and I have lived there for 18 years. I am located
at ground zero between this property development and the Galpin boulevard reconstruction.
I have attended every city planning and council meeting on this topic. I recognize the difficulty and importance of
this decision. I have thought long and hard about this and tried to determine what I would do if this were my
decision. I’ve always wondered what would become of this land when he was gone. I’ve imagined many things
from a golf course, a park land, some sort of memorial space with an amphitheater, or something like Matt Myers
has been envisioning in his comments. The worst possible scenario I can imagine is clear cutting all of that old
growth forest, leveling those rolling hill acres, and putting in a high density housing subdivision. Therefore, I would
ask that you vote No to this PUD proposal and reject these development plans.
I respect and appreciate the amount of work that has gone into this plan by the developer, Kate, and city staff. I
think the concept of preserving a park land west of Lake Ann is enticing. I am an avid outdoorsman, and nobody
would benefit more from that space more then me and my family. But it is not worth the cost of building a high
density development on the remaining space.
My comments and feedback so far on this development have been to minimize the impact on the environment,
minimize the loss of old growth forest, and to preserve a buffer between the existing neighborhoods and the
development. None of that has been addressed with this proposal. Nobody has reached out to me to seek my
opinion in this manner, short of the city council meetings. My recommendation is that we try to preserve the
property as-is as much as possible. And if we cannot do that, only develop the open land with low density and do
not cut down all the trees and grade the land.
The last thought I will leave you with is to ask that you think about what he would have wanted for this property.
Surely his importance to the community and the impact he’s had across the world should have some weight on his
legacy. I have to think that there is no way a high density housing development would have been his choice. Let’s
find another option for this property and pay him respect.
Dake Chatfield
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Statement opposing the Galpin Project
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:07:48 AM
-----Original Message-----
From: Kristen <kjkelroy@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 10:32 PM
To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Statement opposing the Galpin Project
Dear City Council,
I’m writing to let you know that I oppose the proposed PUD for the Galpin project. I by no means have a “not in my
backyard” mentality...because growth and development is bound to happen. However I do believe that the
builder/buyer of the land can and should do better to preserve the beauty of Chanhassen. I would like to see minimal
tree removal and something that better addresses the increased traffic that is bound to come from dropping in a new
development. I feel as though Mayor Elise Ryan has been thoughtful in hearing people out and am confident she has
the best interest for keeping Chanhassen unique and beautiful. I encourage you press for better as well and do not
pass the PUD. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Kristen Nordberg
2126 Majestic Way
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Sent from my iPhone
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Citizen Letter - PUD
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 6:31:03 PM
Attachments:Citizen Letter_PUD_Christian Myers.docx
ATT00001.htm
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Christian Myers" <christian.myers@mchsi.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 6:22:46 PM CDT
To: <'eryan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'>, <'dcampion@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'>,
<'jcoleman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'>, <btjornhom@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'>,
<'jmcdonald@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'>
Cc: <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Citizen Letter - PUD
Please see the attached letter for my concerns about the recently proposed
development. Thank you for your time and attention.
Thank you,
Christian Myers
612.964.9061
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Developing Prince’s property
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 4:53:57 PM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Linda W <lindawilkes@live.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 4:52:00 PM CDT
To: "kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Fwd: Developing Prince’s property
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Linda Wilkes <lindawilkes@live.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 4:49:50 PM CDT
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Developing Prince’s property
To our Mayor and City Council, This is such a bad idea! It will
destroy the lakes and park. We do not need more housing especially
in that beautiful little oasis in the middle of Chanhassen. Why can’t it
just stay a park that all can enjoy instead of polluting the whole area.
The city should buy it and I for one think that our exorbitantly high
taxes be used for what residents want. Especially when it comes to
preserving our dwindling natural areas. Please find an alternative
option to this disastrous plan. We the people want a say in this
endeavor. Start a go fund me with residents and see what happens.
Linda Wilkes
Sent from my iPad
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Email RE: Galpin Development
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 8:11:52 PM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Richard Sit <richardsit32@gmail.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 8:10:29 PM CDT
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, eryan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Cc: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, Andrea Sit <andrea.i.h.sit@gmail.com>
Subject: Email RE: Galpin Development
March 10, 2019
Dear Mayor Ryan and the Chanhassen City Council,
We urge the Chanhassen City Council to reject the current PUD and
density transfer development plans proposed by Lennar. The Galpin
Development property is a unique piece of land and offers a rare
opportunity to preserve and enhance the Lake Ann area and nearby
Chanhassen neighborhoods for current and future generations.
The Galpin Development property is the only remaining virtually
untouched land of hills and wetlands left in the City of Chanhassen. There
are other less unique pieces of land that could be developed into housing
subdivisions. For example, there are many more acres of farmland already
stripped of trees and of which the topography has already been changed.
The Galpin Development property was never farmed and retains its
original topography, wetlands, and Big Woods. These features also make
the land less than ideal for a housing subdivision on the scale of the
current proposal.
We oppose this development on behalf of the current and future citizens
of Chanhassen. This plan is contrary to Chanhassen’s 2040
Comprehensive Plan which calls for the protection of significant wooded
areas. We and our children cherish the wildlife, wetlands, and trees that
make up this land, and we strongly urge you to preserve this pristine area
of land and wetlands for current and future generations. This plan strongly
resembles the destruction of a beautiful forest and wildlife habitat in the
movie, The Lorax. It is beyond heartbreaking to imagine this beautiful
land torn up, filled in, and bulldozed. Also, Lennar’s plans for preserving
existing trees and wetlands and the proposed tree buffers along the North
and South borders of the Galpin Development property are grossly
inadequate to meet the goals of Chanhassen’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan
and to maintain the existing character of the nearby neighborhoods. We
moved here in 2016 from Shorewood because of the open spaces, woods,
and natural beauty, and if this plan goes through, we will be forced to
move again to remove ourselves from the heartbreak of seeing this land
desecrated.
We are also concerned about the ever-increasing traffic volume on Galpin
Boulevard between Highways 5 and 7. In addition, it is already hazardous
to turn right (Eastward) onto Highway 7 with cars crossing two lanes of
traffic to get to Excelsior and holding up the line of traffic waiting behind
them to get onto Highway 7. People take chances pulling onto Highway 7
when there are cars lined up behind them. We have both witnessed near-
accidents occurring here.
Thank you for hearing our concerns. We hope that you make the correct
decision.
Sincerely,
Andrea and Richard Sit
1957 Topaz Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
andreaihsit@gmail.com
richardsit32@gmail.com
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Galpin Property Development
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 4:16:59 PM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jennifer Smolka <jenlynnsmolka@gmail.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 4:09:17 PM CDT
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Galpin Property Development
To whom it may concern,
I am a resident of Chanhassen who is writing to you today to oppose the new
housing development around Lake Lucy and Lake Ann, as this area is vital for
wetlands and wildlife, and once it is developed, it cannot be restored. Wetlands
and the lands surrounding them work together to provide ecological benefits for
our community - benefits that are undermined when land is razed for
development, obliterating wildlife corridors and interrupting habitats and food
chains necessary to preserve the ecosystem as a whole. Wetlands provide flood
and erosion protection, water quality improvement, and climate stability.
Wetlands are also the breeding ground for dragonflies, which provide us with a
natural form of mosquito control.
I work with and am a board member of the Frankfurt Zoological Society, an
international NGO based in Germany and Washington DC with over 30
conservation projects in 18 countries around the world, whose mission is to
preserve critical ecosystems and biodiversity. But conservation must begin in our
own backyards. Because if we allow ourselves to destroy our resources - one area
at a time - eventually the benefits provided to us by these irreplaceable natural
habitats will be gone.
Minnesota leads the nation in conservation stewardship. It is my hope that the
City of Chanhassen will safeguard the future of our community's environment by
choosing be a leader in conservation now.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Smolka
500 Trap Line Lane
Chanhassen
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Galpin property PUD
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 3:21:57 PM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Vanessa Martin <Vanessa_Martin@jjtaylor.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 3:11:26 PM CDT
To: "council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: "kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Galpin property PUD
Hello, my name is vanessa martin.
We live at 2325 hunter drive Chanhassen mn.
I strongly oppose the PUD, please take into consideration those who have
purchased for the beauty and quality of life that is in jeopardy.
Vanessa
Get Outlook for Android
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended
solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient,
you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically
archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business.
Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in;
.
Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Galpin Property
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 5:56:22 PM
Attachments:image001.png
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: <michelle.myers@mchsi.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 5:54:59 PM CDT
To: "'Councilman Jerry McDonald'" <'jmcdonald@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'>, "'Councilwoman Bethany Tjornhom'"
<'btjornhom@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'>, "'Councilwoman Julia Coleman'" <'jcoleman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'>,
"'Councilman Dan Campion'" <'dcampion@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'>, "'Mayor Elise Ryan'"
<'eryan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'>
Cc: <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Galpin Property
The beauty of nature’s bounty….
And we are about to lose it all. That’s is unless, you as our Chanhassen City Council preserve it for future generations.
So many people think this is an either/or with the Lennar plans. They don’t seem to understand we can choose not to succumb
to big builders and we can choose to ask for more.
The quality of life in Chanhassen will change for the worse if we have to contend with 181 more homes confined to such a small
space. The lakes and habitats will be adversely
affected by the destruction of the land. Water quality will diminish and wildlife will be permanently displaced.
There must be other options to leave hope for the future. Require more of builders looking to build in Chanhassen. Innovation
and compassion are not mutually exclusive.
Please consider rejecting Lennar’s proposals as they are now.
Thank you,
Michelle Myers
7421 Windmill Drive
Chanhassen, MN
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: I oppose the Galpin PUD
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 5:55:14 PM
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tami Gottschalk <tamig66@gmail.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 5:24:54 PM CDT
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Cc: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: I oppose the Galpin PUD
Dear Chanhassen City Council,
I respectfully urge the council to reject the current PUD and density transfer. The
PRN Galpin property is unique piece of land. My husband and I built our home
facing the property 20 years ago. We truly enjoy the beauty of the minimally
touched property.
It is the virtually the only untouched land of hills and wetlands left in the City of
Chanhassen. There are many more acres of farmland that could be developed into
housing subdivisions if the housing need is so great.
I worry about the wildlife that live in those wetlands and woods within this
property. While the PUD saves the wetlands down by the lake, it destroys the
wetlands and the trees on the south hill. The property has been a de facto nature
preserve for more than a decade. There is an abundance of wildlife on the site
that would only be displaced or wiped out. There are deer, coyotes, turkeys,
ducks and opossums.
The scale of the current proposal scares me. Along with the apartments going in
downtown, I am concerned about the strain on the schools.
I also worry about the increased traffic this proposed development will bring;
understanding the new and improved roadway. Still too much traffic going at
unreasonable speeds.
I know the PRN Estate and Lennar have timelines but that does not mean the
citizens and elected officials of Chanhassen have to meet those deadlines.
Please consider what is before you on behalf of me, my family and my neighbors.
No future City council will be able to make a decision like this one. This type of
land will not exist any more in Chanhassen. Please put a referendum to the vote
of the citizens of Chanhassen, the people you were elected to serve.
Thank you,
Tami Gottschalk
2197 Majestic Way
Chanhassen MN
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: I oppose the PUD on Galpin Rd
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:52:55 AM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jacqueline Tyson <jactyson03@me.com>
Date: March 11, 2019 at 8:41:08 AM CDT
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Cc: Chanhassen City Planner <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: I oppose the PUD on Galpin Rd
As a long time resident of the Longacres community in Chanhassen, I just want to
share with you that I oppose the current PUD for the former property owned by
Prince.
As it is proposed, in the very least, this PUD will increase traffic through my
neighborhood and along Galpin Road. However I feel it will have a larger
negative impact on the city of Chanhassen at large. I’m not convinced the city
has explored all the ways this PUD will impact our community. Please take the
time to evaluate, and let developers know we demand more from them - access to
Lake Ann, less density and perhaps most importantly less destruction of our
beautiful landscape - we don’t want all the trees removed & land flattened for
more homes!!!
Concerned residents,
Jacqueline & George Tyson
7414 Moccasin Trail
Chanhassen
Sent from my iPhone
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Oppose the PUD!
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 3:08:37 PM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: C Jerdee <cjerdee@gmail.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 2:49:14 PM CDT
To: "council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>,
"kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>,
"mayor@ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <mayor@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Oppose the PUD!
Craig Jerdee, 6621 Chestnut Ln 55317 here
I oppose the PUD and urge you to do the same. Make Lennar or whomever stands
to develop and profit from the development work harder to come up with a better
plan.
I’d love to see a non-development option, and sell bonds to fund the city the
purchasing the land for all to enjoy. We’ll never have another opportunity to do
this! Now is the time!
If you vote for the PUD, we, the voters, will make sure to remember that come
election time.
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Oppose
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 3:08:20 PM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Natalia Sander <nataliasander@me.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 2:54:28 PM CDT
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Cc: <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Oppose
The proposed PUD is NOT the right thing for the residents of Chanhassen
Please vote No
Natalia Sander
6671 Amberwood Lane
Thank you.
Natalia N. Sander- Realtor
Edina Realty- Minnetonka
(612) 850-7737
Http://nataliasanderhomes.com
Your referral is the best compliment I can earn!
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Prince / Lennar Proposed Development
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 3:07:55 PM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Mark Seefeldt <maseefeldt@gmail.com>
Date: March 9, 2019 at 1:06:40 PM CST
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Cc: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Prince / Lennar Proposed Development
Dear Chanhassen Council,
Will the plans impact me? A little with increased traffic and infrastructure usage, but
my yard doesn’t touch the proposed development property. I live a block south of the
proposed development. I have a line of tall spruce trees in my backyard separating my
backyard from the neighbors. That was one of the reasons we bought our house. If
those trees were not there, we would not have purchased.
Am I strongly against either plan? No.
Will we all get over it? Yes. Time heals all wounds.
Which plan is the right choice? Neither in my opinion. This shouldn’t be a quid pro
quo. If Lennar wants to only develop the western half of the property, then the density
should fall in line with the master plan and zoning requirements that the city has set. If
Lennar is a good developer and wants to keep developing in Chanhassen, then they’ll
recognize the voice of the community and not develop the eastern half close to Lake
Ann. There is better plans and options out there that haven’t been brought to the
table yet.
I urge you to vote no to Lennar’s density transfer plan. Put the decision about
developing the full property (while meeting density requirements) back on to them.
They’ll find a better solution or someone else will.
Thank you,
Mark & Jennifer Seefeldt
7470 Tulip Court
952-297-2645
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Prince Property - Vote NO on Lennar Development
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 3:08:10 PM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Rebecca Nay <nay.rebecca@gmail.com>
Date: March 9, 2019 at 1:37:29 PM CST
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Cc: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Prince Property - Vote NO on Lennar Development
I am one of the area residents who have enjoyed the beautiful Prince property
around Lake Ann and Lake Lucy for many years, I am thankful to Prince who
allowed the public to enjoy his land. Ibeg the city to say no to the Lennar
development andallow the area residents to continue to enjoy one of the last
remaining nature areas in the city. It would take away trees, pollute the lakes,
increase noise and traffic congestion, and overall will ruin a once peaceful and
beautiful oasis.
-Rebecca Nay
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Prince Property proposal
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:52:42 AM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Abby Ellis <abby.ellis11@gmail.com>
Date: March 11, 2019 at 8:33:29 AM CDT
To: btjornhom@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, "council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>,
dcampion@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, eryan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, jcoleman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, jmcdonald@ci.chanhassen.mn.us,
"kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: Neil Ellis <neil.ellis4@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Prince Property proposal
Hello all!
I am not opposed to A development, but AM opposed to Lennars scare tactics to get the city to do what they want. I am IN FAVOR
of the city exploring more responsible and thorough propsals that have full transparency into the end result. There are way too many
unknowns in this proposal that Lennar has simply ignored, despite many requests by council to research and provide details. The city
owes it to the current residents of Chanhassen and the Comprehensive Plan to uphold the higher standards Mayor Ryan mentions and
require detailed information of ANY development proposed here. I hope you do the right thing and insist on this by voting ‘NO’
tonight.
Thank you!
Abby and Neil Ellis
7284 Bent Bow Trail
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:42 PM Abby Ellis <abby.ellis11@gmail.com> wrote:
Good evening,
I was one of many Chanhassen residents who attended the city planning session tonight. It is great to see so many people engaged
in this process and voice their opinions respectfully. I was excited to hear an update on the inevitable development. Boy did Lennar
disappoint! Still 181 homes, still only the Concept Plan and the same PUD Plan that was proposed last time, only very slight
variations were made. If I were Mayor and Council, I would be extremely frustrated with the amount of time and resources spent
by city and staff without the results that were asked for on several occasions.
Many of the residents who spoke tonight were in support of the proposed PUD. The vast majority of them did so with the position
of 'but what would the alternative be' and 'we don't want to risk losing the opportunity to have the area west of Lake Ann'. The
many nature-lovers stated that the current proposal would preserve the land around the lake for the wildlife that inhabits the area
currently. I am concerned that the wildlife would be forced out during the 2+ years construction of the area, excavating the land,
altering the entire topography of the landscape, tree removal, noise and air pollution, etc. Perhaps wildlife would return once all is
settled, but that is a lot of disruption to a thriving ecosystem.
I am unclear on how the density transfer works. If it is literally the transferring of existing trees from the area to be developed to the
western edge of the lake and buffer areas, how viable is that? Will the mature trees really survive when transplanted? Our soil is not
the greatest here and I have trouble believing that 20'-30' trees that have rooted where they are will sustain if migrated around the
property. How about an expert opinion from a horticulturist or an unbiased authority to weigh in on that?
Regarding the increase to traffic and the plan for Galpin Blvd...how could this NOT be incorporated in this project? Many residents
voiced their concerns about the traffic increase and safety issues that currently exist, let alone with approximately 362 drivers (2 per
household) added to the mix. There are already concerns about traffic congestion and visibility. Of the 3 entrances proposed off
Galpin, 2 of them feed directly to/from Longacres neighborhood. There will absolutely be an increase of traffic running through our
neighborhood for access to 41. What does the city's plan include to address those concerns of our neighborhood's safety?
Here's a big unknown...is the land that Lennar is "gifting" to Chanhassen even able to be developed? Do we even have to worry about
that if Lennar's proposal is not accepted? There were varying opinions on that tonight, but none of them official. Why don't we have an
unbiased analysis on that aspect of this plan? That would answer a lot of questions that residents have.
Some of the residents brought up good points about the area that would be a continuation of the park around Lake Ann, that it
would mainly serve as a draw to the new development. Unless there is public parking spaces and areas for people to gather, similar
to the existing Lake Ann park, it's simply a bonus to the people who purchase homes in the development and not a realistic benefit
to the other residents of Chanhassen. So their newly constructed homes reduce the value of homes for currently established
residents AND they get the benefit of 54+ acres in their backyard that we have generously persevered for their enjoyment and their
property values? That doesn't live up to the commitment to the current residents of Chanhassen that I would hope to be considered.
Several speakers provided historical perspectives and are clearly proud Chan residents. I appreciate their wise decisions made
decades ago in purchasing and preserving the land in this community that we are so passionate about. Many comments have been
made about this shouldn't be an 'either/or' proposition and it isn't! Decisions of this magnitude should not be made under pressure from a
company that has their own best interest, AND PROFIT, as the highest priority. The city of Chanhassen doesn't owe Lennar an agreement to
one of their two proposals. Lennar owes it to the city of Chanhassen and it's residents to present a responsible, sustainable proposal
that supports this community's values.
Mayor Ryan - I really appreciated your public letter in response to other council members public appeal for this proposal. I am proud that we have elected
officials in place now who are listening to residents and fulfilling the comprehensive plan. Please keep up the commitment and the good work. The right
proposal is out there for Chanhassen, but it has not been presented yet or this would be a done deal already. There are too many unanswered questions to
make a well-planned decision.
See you on March 11th!
Abby Ellis
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:16 AM Abby Ellis <abby.ellis11@gmail.com> wrote:
Good morning!
I appreciate the time council and the planning commission has invested in this proposal. I joined the Facebook group regarding
this and provided my comments from the meeting last night. I’d like to share them with you:
Mayor Ryan mentioned that, of the feedback she received, the vast majority of residents recognized that the land would be
developed (vs left alone), but would like to see a plan that is more “responsible”. I have the impression that she is not pleased that
Lennar is coming back with minimum changes in the several revisions to date. It appears that Lennar is getting irritated and was
nearly threatening the council regarding the land around Lake Ann. Personally, I think it feels like blackmail. What I don’t
understand is why the city is in this position to HAVE to accept a proposal from Lennar or lose the Lake Ann land. Doesn’t the
city have final say with permits and zoning to allow/not the land to be developed? How is it that Lennar is coming from an ‘upper
hand’ position? Perhaps this is just the way these deals are when developers obtain an agreement to purchase as they have.
Excuse my lack of familiarity with the process. But I keep scratching my head like, ‘how did we get here’?
I appreciate that Mayor Ryan is clearly listening to residents surrounding the perimeter of the land and voicing their concerns as
well as referring to the Comprehensive Plan and keeping that commitment in the forefront.
There are more details that need to be addressed:
Traffic along Galpin - it was stated that the city has a plan in place already to upgrade Galpin. How does this coincide with
plans/changes to the proposals from Lennar?
How does the city plan to address the through traffic that will occur on Longacres Drive b/w Galpin and 41? It will become busy
like Lake Lucy Rd. vs the quieter neighborhood street it is currently.
How do the current residents, who have invested in Chanhassen’s economy and property tax base, deal with the loss in home
values when compared to these new homes at the same price point as homes that are 20 years old? Where is the commitment to
the existing home owners who have invested in their homes and this community for decades?
Soliciting feedback from other residents is great and the right thing to do. However, the residents who are not directly impacted
by the process of construction, the drastic change of the quality of life and decrease in home values, may focus on preserving the
Lake Ann land without considering how this development will negatively impact those of us who live surrounding the area.
I continue to believe that there is still an opportunity for better compromise. The city should not have to be forced to make a
decision on Lennar’s timeline with their contract to purchase. If Lennar wants to move ahead, they should have made the
adjustments requested by staff and the council previously vs the minimum effort. I’d like to see the city taking a stronger
approach to ensure a responsible decision, taking as much time as that requires, in order to uphold Chanhassen’s commitment to
the Comp Plan and the current residents.
I look forward to the city planning meeting that is on March 5 and the city council meeting on March 11.
Thanks!!!
Abby Ellis
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:47 AM Abby Ellis <abby.ellis11@gmail.com> wrote:
We are current residents of Longacres and I have been a Chanhassen resident for over 15 years. What we appreciate about our
city are the green spaces, the sense of community and the commitment our city council has to maintain the integrity of our
special place to live.
I have involved myself in community events and previous proposals in front of city council, most actively when Wallmart had
a proposal in front of our council. I was a member of the Chanhassen First volunteer group who helped organize the residents
who were opposed to the proposal. I am proud that my contribution encouraged the city council to make the right decision on
this proposal.
Our concern about this Lennar proposal is that it does not follow the commitment the city council has made to the residents of
Chanhassen. We attended the city planning commission meeting on Jan 15 and were disappointed in the result. It appears that
Lennar is attempting to bribe the city to meet their proposal in exchange for the 50 acres around the northwest area of Lake
Ann. The developer representing Lennar could not speak to the sustainability efforts that would be made, and that is very
concerning for our environment. The extensive loss of a variety of mature trees, wildlife that depends on the ecosystem and the
aesthetics of the topography of the land would be catastrophic. We are also very concerned about the increase in traffic through
our neighborhood and the decrease in our home values.
We are not opposed to development of our area, recognizing that we have a jewel of a city and this is attractive land for
development. We ask the city council to stay committed to the current residents who have contributed to the economy and
quality of this community. There must be other options to explore that will enable the long-term plan, so carefully developed
by our city leaders, to continue to support our values.
Thank you,
Abby and Neil Ellis
7284 Bent Bow Trail
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Prince Property: proposed development
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 8:11:24 PM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Stephanie Rutledge <p-s.rutledge@mchsi.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 8:09:06 PM CDT
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Cc: <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Prince Property: proposed development
Dear Chanhassen City Council:
Is the proposed PUD the right thing for the residents of Chanhassen?
We vote NO!
Thank you.
Sent from
Patrick and Stephanie Rutledge
7568 Walnut Curv
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Prince PUD
Date:Sunday, March 10, 2019 4:53:34 PM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tom’s New Gmail <7381tbell@gmail.com>
Date: March 10, 2019 at 4:41:49 PM CDT
To: council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Cc: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Prince PUD
Dear Council,
As I have emailed most of you about different dimensions of the PUD request by
Lennar, I’d like to one more time reiterate that I’m against the proposal.
Among my concerns is that though the request has been made several times,
Lennar has never definitively shown that the parkland they want to give to the city
is, in fact, buildable for 50 single family homes. The density transfer is
predicated on that fact.
If the PUD is granted, there should be more protections provided for those who
are most affected.
If the PUD is denied, the city should figure out a way to purchase some of the
land as parkland.
Tom Bell
7381 Fawn Hill Rd
Longacres
Sent from my iPhone
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:Fwd: Proposed Development of Galpin property
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 8:53:31 AM
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: mary beth johnson <mbsilbs@me.com>
Date: March 11, 2019 at 8:45:35 AM CDT
To: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Proposed Development of Galpin property
To whom it may concern, my family and I believe the currently proposed Galpin
PUD is NOT the thing for the residents of Chanhassen.
We are strongly opposed to this plan for Princes property based on the density of
proposed new homes and it’s negative impact on our open/green spaces, traffic,
school systems and the financial impact it will have on the bordering
neighborhoods of similarly priced homes.
Thank you for your consideration of our concerns.
Mary Beth Silbernagel
7492 Bent Bow Trail
Chanhassen, MN 55317
612-245-9759
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Galpin Property Development
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 10:05:46 AM
From: Ryan Erickson <ryanaerickson@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 9:55 AM
To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Aanenson, Kate
<kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Galpin Property Development
To whom it may concern,
I am a resident of Chanhassen who is writing to you today to oppose the new housing
development around Lake Lucy and Lake Ann. As a recent addition to the Chan community (I
moved here 2 years ago), I moved here specifically because of the wetlands and wildlife.
Wetlands and the lands surrounding them work together to provide ecological benefits for our
community - benefits that are undermined when land is razed for development, obliterating
wildlife corridors and interrupting habitats and food chains necessary to preserve the
ecosystem as a whole. Wetlands provide flood and erosion protection, water quality
improvement, and climate stability. Wetlands are also the breeding ground for dragonflies,
which provide us with a natural form of mosquito control. In addition to the science behind the
need to protect our wetlands and woodlands, they provide a beauty to the area that prompted
me to choose to become a member of Chanhassen instead of so many other spots in the
Minneapolis/St Paul area. I would hate to see Chan lose what makes it so great.
Sincerely,
Ryan Erickson
500Trap Line Lane
Chanhassen
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Galpin Property Letter
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 11:44:39 AM
From: Mars Chatfield <mars.chatfield@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 11:42 AM
To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Aanenson, Kate
<kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Galpin Property Letter
Dear Mayor Ryan and City Council members,
My name is Marsden Chatfield and I live at 2200 Majestic Way in Chanhassen. I border the
south side of the proposed development property in the Royal Oaks neighborhood. I have lived at
this location for the past 18 years. I am located at ground zero between this property development
and the Galpinboulevard reconstruction.
I moved into this house when I was one year old and have been living here my entire life.
While I may not yet be an experienced member of society with decades of residency under my belt, I
feel as though my 19-year-old opinion should still be considered, if not taken with more weight than
others’; I am the fruit that Chanhassen has produced. I love this town with all of my heart, and will
continue to love it whether or not you develop this property into a neighborhood. So rather than
boring you with an emotional memoir telling the experience that this property has allowed me, I
write this letter to you in the name of logic and common sense- I hope that you will find this more
relevant to your decision.
While I am not an economist or city planner, not (yet) a financial analyst or
environmentalist, I am still able to recognize the foolishness of your proposal- simply as an observer.
It is true that I live at ground zero and that this place means a lot to me, but even if it were not this
way I could still see the golden opportunity that is being overlooked; how could I miss it?
Chanhassen, MN: a small, developing suburb just outside of Minneapolis is graced by one of the
largest icons in all of music history, who personally advocates and shares his love of the town, an
ideal situation for a newer suburb who possesses no deep roots in culture, little to no historic value,
and lots of open space. After the passing of this beloved star, the town of Chanhassen is swamped by
tourists from all across the country who hope to see the place where their idol spent most of his time-
tourism which brings in thousands of dollars for local businesses, further promoting Chanhassen’s
booming economy.
Now, here’s the part that doesn’t make any sense to me. The city of Chanhassen receives the
beautiful, sprawling property that Prince himself had purchased and built his private residence on.
While the home is now destroyed, the acres of rolling hills and beautiful wildlife still persist,
untouched by any industrial development or manmade infractions. Chanhassen is essentially given a
‘Graceland’; an opportunity to dig its feet into national history for decades to come. What boggles
my mind is that, rather than milking Prince for as many cultural sites and memorials as possible
while simultaneously pleasing the citizens of their town, my city council would rather flatten that
gorgeous plot of nature and cover it in concrete; stimulating the local economy briefly and
destroying both a natural gem and a potential heritage site forever.
This proposed development makes sense, don’t get me wrong-it just makes sense right now.
In a growing suburb, you will increase the overall property value, bring in more citizens which in
turn inflate the local economy; businesses make more money, you all earn more taxes-- our city will
become better, I understand that. I just wish that you could recognize the potential gold mine you
have here, if things were handled the right way. Chanhassen could become nationally realized as
‘Prince’s town’; the Motown of Minnesota, the Graceland of the Great Lakes- yet my city is focused
on short term gains and development rather than establishing Chanhassen as a city to withstand the
test of time, a city to be taught about in schools around the country for years to come.
Thirty years from now, what do you expect of this neighborhood? The houses will remain
full, the foundations sound, the streets paved- I expect you will do a good job on construction.
However after thirty years, the neighborhood will lose its glimmer. Take a look at neighborhoods
built in the 1980’s and 1990’s- these neighborhoods are no longer the apple of the homebuyer’s eye,
instead they are typically considered options which are safer for buyers’ checkbooks; temporary
homes to be lived in until income increases. In the year2050 aneighborhood on this land will be
approaching its demise, whereas a city park will likely only have increased in beauty and value; an
oasis of natural delicacy in a city which willpresumably be much larger than it is today.
All in all, my point is this: in pursuit of economic prosperity, environmental conservation,
cultural enhancement, residential happiness, and respect for the deceased and his family, the city of
Chanhassen ought not develop a neighborhood on the property adjacent to Galpin Boulevard, nor on
any of the properties previously owned by Prince and company. The city should, however, recognize
the potential value of these properties and improve them to serve not only as amenities to the
townspeople and tourists, but also to honor a great neighbor who we miss dearly. I hope that this
letter does not fall on deaf ears, and that my council will act in favor of the city it represents rather
than the expansion of its treasury.
Marsden Chatfield
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Lennar Development (Prince Property)
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 10:43:13 AM
From: Susan Mcallister <smcallister7510@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 10:37 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Lennar Development (Prince Property)
Dear Madam Mayor, City Council,
I have lived in Chanhassen for 58 years, since 1959, and when we arrived it was just a "hick
town" as my mother would refer to it. I have seen almost all the rural areas disappear to
development over time.
I watched the video for public comment at the Planning Commission Meeting when it popped
upon my phone. Because I now reside in Waconia I unfortunately didn't know about it until it
was too late which was the day after.
I just want to comment on the numerous residents who don't want it abutting their homes. The
reality is, they don't "own" their view so if they don't want to look at it, then unfortunately
they haveto buy their view, becausedevelopment is inevitable and obviously clustering is the
only way to preserve the beautiful greenspace we find in this property and all others going
forward.
I hope you adopt the plan as shown because it is very sensitive to the site. I think the
developer, along with the planning department has done an absolutely wonderful job putting
this together.
Please make sure though, that every tree in the 54 acres is protected and that it is not tobe
accessed by car, that the only way to access the 54 acres is by foot.
Also, if there is ANY possibility to protect a few of the old growth trees in the clustered
section of the planthat wouldbe wonderful. I realize this might not be possible due to the
regrading that will happen.
Lastly, I would ask the developer to name it Purple Meadows.
Sincerely,
Susan McAllister
100West 3rd Street #302
Waconia, MN 55387
952.228.4511
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Prince Property
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 1:05:36 PM
From: Juli Gempler <juliannagem@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 1:04 PM
To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Prince Property
We oppose the PUD development. We are at 1877 Topaz Drive. We have lived here for 14
years and feel there needs to be other options for the property that preserves and protects the
natural beauty and resouces it provides. Please take into considerstion the people, the
residents that call this area home. This is a unique opportunity to do the right thing, step out of
the box and vote no.
Thank you for all of your efforts and considerstion,
Juli and Mark Gempler
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
From:Aanenson, Kate
To:Meuwissen, Kim
Subject:FW: Proposed Development Galpin Blvd.
Date:Monday, March 11, 2019 10:28:21 AM
From: Connie Moore <CMoore@mclindengrp.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 10:14 AM
To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Fwd: Proposed Development Galpin Blvd.
Begin forwarded message:
From: CONNIE MOORE <cmoore@mclindengrp.com>
Subject: Proposed Development Galpin Blvd.
Date: March 11, 2019 at 9:53:01 AM CDT
To: <council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Cc: <kaanerson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Dear Council Members and City Planner,
First and foremost, thank you for your service.
We have been residents of Chanhassen for 24 years and have experienced
tremendous growth and prosperity. We have felt that the leadership of
Chanhassen has had it’s residents best interest at heart.
We are opposed to the current development under discussion due to the density
and the impact it will have on the community.
In making your decision, please consider the affect it will have on green space,
traffic, schools and community as a whole.
Thank you for your consideration.
Dave and Connie Moore
7330 Moccasin Trail
Chanhassen, MN 55317
2019 Commissions Interview Schedule
FIRST MEETINGS IN APRIL:
Planning Commission - April 2, 2018
Environmental Commission - April 10, 2019
Senior Commission - April 18, 2019
Park & Rec Commission - April 23, 2019
City Council InterviewsEnvironmental Commission Interviews - February 13
February 25 (Monday):6:00Brian Smith (PRC 2nd Choice)
8:00Bhakti Modi (SC)6:15Ross Reeves (PRC 2nd Choice)
8:15Alice "Lisa" Lyon (SC)6:30
8:306:45Andrew Allen-NO SHOW
8:45Gerald Cook (PC)7:00Jeff Harken
9:00Laura Skistad (PC & PRC)
9:15 Planning Commission Interviews - February 19
9:30Andrew Aller (PC incumbent-coming from airport may be earlier)1stAntonio J. Fricano (SC 2nd Choice)
2ndBala Chintaginjala-NO SHOW WITHDRAWN
February 26 (Tuesday): 3rdDouglas Reeder (PRC 2nd Choice)
5:00Sandy Sweetser (PRC)4thGerald Cook
5:15Bill Hickey (PRC)5thLynn Pelto WITHDRAWN
Annette Stock-Lind
5:30Natalia Sander (PC-NO SHOW AT PC INTERVIEW) WITHDRAWN 6th
5:45Laurie Susla (PC)7thNatalia Sander-NO SHOW
6:00Jeff Harken (EC)8thJohn Kunitz
6:15Lynn Pelto (PC) WITHDRAW 9thLaurie Susla
6:30Steve Weick (PC incumbent)10thLaura Skistad (PRC 2nd Choice)
6:45Annette Stock Lind (PC)
7:00BREAKSenior Commission Interviews - February 21
7:15Rick Echternacht (PRC incumbent)4:10Ruth Lunde
7:30Cole Kelly (PRC incumbent)4:30Jim Camarata
7:45Haley Pemrick (PRC)4:50Alice "Lisa" Lyon
8:00Drew Allen (EC-NO SHOW AT EC INTERVIEW)5:10Bhakti Modi
8:15Brian Smith (EC & PRC)5:30Mike Schachterle
8:30Antonio Fricano (PC & SC)5:50Antonio Fricano (PC 1st Choice)
8:45Ruth Lunde (SC)
9:00Jim Camarata (SC)Park & Rec Commission Interviews - February 26
5:45Bill Hickey
March 11 6:00Laura Skistad
4:30Doug Reeder (PC & PRC)6:15Sandy Sweetser
4:45John Kunitz (PC)6:30Doug Reeder
5:00Bill Chappell (EC incumbent)6:45Ross Reeves
5:15Mike Schachterle (SC)7:00Brian Smith
5:30Ross Reeves (EC & PRC)7:15Haley Pemrick
5:45Matt Kutz (PRC-OUT OF COUNTRY FOR PRC INTERVIEW)
6:00Discuss Commission Appointments
Incumbents
All commission appointments will take place at the March 11, 2019 City Council Meeting
2018 Planning Commission Attendance Record
Percentage
of
July 3
May 1
June 5
April 3
July 17
May 15
June 19
April 17
Attendance
March 6
August 7
Otober 2
January 2
March 20
August 21
January 16February 6
October 16
February 20
December 4
November 6
September 4
November 20
September 18
Andrew Aller
1111111111111193%
4/10 - 4/19
Mark Undestad
0000110111001147%
4/5 - 4/20
Steven Weick
1010111110110167%
4/13 - 4/19
John Tietz
1111111101011180%
4/15 - 4/20
Mark Randall
1101101111111180%
6/16 - 4/21
Michael McGonagill
1110011101047%
4/18 - 4/21
Nancy Madsen
1111111111111193%
4/15 - 4/19
Total Attended54040050076506606556060
Number of meetings to
15
date:
red means no meeting
PARK & RECREATIONCOMMISSION APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION – 2019
Terms Expiring:
Cole Kelly (Reapplied)
COMMISSIONCOUNCIL
Rick Echternacht (Reapplied)
RANK RANK
Steve Scharfenburg (Resigning with one year left in his term)
Grant Schaeferle (Youth Representative-no longer eligible)
Cole Kelly, 1556 Bluebill Trail1
Rick Echternacht, 8746 Flamingo Drive 2
Sandy Sweetser, 9132 Springfield Drive 3
Applicants
Haley Pemrick,7608 Erie Avenue4
Bill Hickey, 6301 Elm Tree Avenue---
Matt Kutz, 1080 Lyman Court---
Brian Smith, 7610 Great Plains Blvd. Apt. 201
5
st
(EC 1 choice)
Ross Reeves, 8471 Swan Court
---
st
(EC 1 choice)
Alternate
Douglas Reeder, 590 Broken Arrow Road
---
st
Applicants
(PC 1choice)
Laura Skistad, 2284 Stone Creek Lane West
---
st
(PC 1choice)
Natalia Sander, 6671 Amberwood Lane (WITHDRAWN) ---
Youth
None ---
Applicants
First
Ranked by:
April 23
Meeting
Steve Scharfenberg, Meredith Petouvis, and Karl Tsuchiya,
in April
Vacancies Two3-Year Terms/ One 1-Year Terms
1.
3-Year Terms (2)
2.
1-Year Term
1.
(1)
g:\\commission\\2019\\park & recreation commission matrix.docx
ENVIRONMENTALCOMMISSION APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
ENVIRONMENTALCOMMISSION – 2019
Terms Expiring:
COMMISSION COUNCIL
Bill Chappell (Reapplied)
RANK RANK
Wayne Benbow
Bill Chappell, 8736 Stonefield Lane (Incumbent)1
Jeff Harken, 7020 Derby Drive 2
Brian Smith 3
Applicants
Ross Reeves 4
Drew Allen5
Alternate
None---
Applicants
Ranked by: Environmental Commissioners Keith Butcher, Don Vasatka,
First
April 10 Greg Hawks, Wayne Benbow, and Kristin Fulkerson. Rachel Popken was
Meeting
absent.
in April
Vacancies Two3-Year Terms
1.
3-Year Terms (2)
2.
g:\\commission\\2019\\environmental commission matrix.docx
SENIORCOMMISSION APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
SENIOR COMMISSION – 2019
Terms Expiring:
COMMISSION COUNCIL
Jackie Engel
RANK RANK
Cheryl Ayotte
Jim Camarata, 6340 Oxbow Bend1
Ruth Lunde, 6721 Hopi Road3
Alice “Lisa” Lyon, 889 Kimberly Lane4
Applicants
Bhakti Modi, 8663 Flamingo Drive 5
Mike Schachterle, 2852 Century Trail 6
Antonio Fricano, 980 Lake Lucy Road
Alternate
2
st
(PC 1choice)
Applicants
Ranked by: Senior Commissioners Barbara Nevin, Jerry Cerchia, and
First
April 18 Mack Titus. Commissioners Dorina Tipton and Carol Buesgens were
Meeting
absent.
in April
Vacancies Three 3-Year Terms
1.
3-Year Terms
2.
(3)
3.
NOTE: The Senior Commission has the option to appoint a total of 7 or 8 commissioners
per Section 2.46-11 (b) of the City Code.
g:\\commission\\2019\\senior commission matrix.docx
2018-2019SENIOR COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE RECORD
AprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDecJanFebMarPercent of
Commissioner
201815201620191521182115Meetings Attended
Dorina A. Tipton XX X XXXX 100%
Cheryl AyotteXXXAXXA71%
Carol BuesgensXXXXXXA85%
Barbara NevinXX X XXXX 100%
Mack TitusXX X AXXX 85%
NO MEETINGNO MEETINGNO MEETINGNO MEETING
Jackie Engel XX X XXXX 100%
Jerry Cerchia XX X XXXX 100%
\\\\cfs5\\cfs5\\shared_data\\plan\\sj\\sc\\attendance\\2018.docx
!"#$%&'(')*+
;2+ <$%)(%='#+%>%?!@@'-(%)(%;2+ <%A!@)+-
,$+-.01'$2)!-"
&-/"#+0.%34546758%%8.79% :
!"#$%) *+%,#$%) *+%,#$'- !"#&'( !"#0-%1*(
)%.+# !"/
%7H77%53H7G
5I7G39 B& ,C *D2'E-'D2/ $% !- -'%FG867646546758
%7H77%KGH77
5I7G3K; !J+#; !"#-($/0+%J+#+-/"'-(%;*/"/ %&BB;7646546758
%7H77%9L5HG5
5I7G3I&+#+-;2+;2+*$+'%&+#+-$+"7646546758
%7H77%59H77
5I7G3LM; NC M; 7646546758
%7H77%33H69
5I7G38M; NC M; 7646546758
%7H77%I5H77
5I7GG7M *0B(""B(""+##+%M *0#7646546758
%7H77%5TKL9H8G
5I7GG5;OAOAO;OANOC&PQAN%OAOCRS%:QAAOR ?;P7646546758
%7H77%K3IHGK
5I7GG6; !J+#; !"#-($/0+%J+#+-/"'-(%;*/"/ %&BB;7646546758
%7H77%5T9K6H97
5I7GG3OUBOC?OUBOC?%V% ??P;Q NO?%QA;7646546758
%7H77%5T356H97
5I7GGGRPRS:AR %R(@"'$#/ $7646546758
%7H77%3L7H59
5I7GG9QA=BQRQA=,?NCQ B%BQRUNQAR%?,&&BS%QA;7646546758
%7H77%53H77
5I7GGKWPU: C:'-( ""%W 2"$ "7646546758
%5T39KH77%7H77
5I7GGIXOARC XOAAO=S%V%RC JOAT%;U CNOCO=7646546758JPQ=
%7H77%88GH77
5I7GGLBO :QABO R,O%PY%:QAAO?PN %;QNQO?7646546758
%7H77%8LHL9
5I7GG8: =R B: ==OA%R B ANOC%U A?OA%BB&7646546758
%7H77%5G6HLI
5I7G97:;X:O=: X+$$ "%:+0/ '*>?!-E/ '*%Q" 7646546758
%7H77%59TG5GHKL
5I7G95:Q=;P,:Q=%;P,ANS%;PP&7646546758
%7H77%3L8H77
5I7G96:/"!&-+:/"!#+@'"%&-+$$7646546758
%7H77%5TIG6H35
5I7G93:PC? B:PCNPA%? BN7646546758
%7H77%KGT65KHI5
5I7G9G:NQ=Q?:NQ%=Q?NCQM,NQAR%QA;7646546758
%7H77%56TL85H93
5I7G99C QNCOC QAMPZ%NCOO%;P:& AS7646546758
%7H77%G7LH77
5I7G9KC ?::Q;U:/ 2 "%C'$@!$$+"7646546758
%7H77%95KH97
5I7G9I?QRA?P?QRA?P,C;O7646546758
%7H77%69H77
5I7G9L?QAA=PA= "%?/""/E+-7646546758
%7H77%6TI97H77
5I7G98?P,?,M? !#21+$#%?!)!-)'"%&!)*/$2/"E7646546758
%7H77%53H77
5I7GK7?,BB& NC&'#-/ /'%?!**/\['"7646546758
%7H77%67H8K
5I7GK5#-/+0++'=++ ""%N-/+#2'-#7646546758
%7H77%KKLHIK
5I7GK6&P?N&P?N: ?NOC7646I46758
%7H77%5T779H77
5I7GK3 ;UO ;%V%UO NQAR%MS%ROPCRO7646L46758
%7H77%IT377H77
5I7GKGNUOC:ON2+-@+ 27646L46758
%7H77%G77H77
5I7GK9 C& C&7646L46758
%7H77%6KKHL7
5I7GKK :ONQC :OCQ; A%NQCO%=Q?NCQM,NPC?%QA;7646L46758
%7H77%3IIHI5
5I7GKI ?&O\\, $D+"%O\]!/D@+"#7646L46758
%7H77%59H77
5I7GKLM; NC M; 7646L46758
%7H77%K98HK8
5I7GK8MOC;PYMOCCS%;PYYOO%;P:& AS7646L46758
%7H77%977H77
5I7GI7M ** "0M **/E%V%? "$T%Q" H7646L46758
%7H77%57H77
5I7GI5; ?OW ;PW ;PM%; ?OMOOC7646L46758
%7H77%559H8K
5I7GI6;PC: Q;PCO%V%: QA%B&7646L46758
%7H77%L3H3K
5I7GI3Y ;:PNY ;NPCS%:PNPC%& CN?%;P:& AS7646L46758
%7H77%KI8H7L
5I7GIGYBO&CQY*++#&-/0+T%Q" H7646L46758
%7H77%5K7H77
5I7GI9RCOZ NR-+'#%Z'#+-$%Y/"'" /'*7646L46758
%7H77%5T769HII
5I7GIKU CNBQYOU'-#^ -0%B/^+%'"0% /0+"#%Q"$!-'" +%; @D'"(7646L46758
%7H77%LLH73
5I7GIIUOA;P,UOAAO&QA%;P,ANS7646L46758
%7H77%5TGKKHKI
5I7GILQ;: CNQ;: %CONQCO:OAN% A=%NC,?N>G9I7646L46758
%7H77%I39H77
5I7GI8B G8Q,PO%B '*%FG87646L46758
%7H77%5IT5I5HL3
5I7GL7:Q=;P,:Q=%;P,ANS%;PP&7646L46758
%7H77%5KH77
5I7GL5:/"!&-+:/"!#+@'"%&-+$$7646L46758
&%;2+ <$%)(%='#+%>%?!@@'-(%)(%;2+ <%A!@)+-%_34546758%%8.79% :`&'E+%5
!"#$%) *+%,#$%) *+%,#$'- !"#&'( )%.+# !"/ !"#0-%1*(
%7H77%53T696H77
5I7GL6:AUO B:A%=O&N%PY%UO BNU7646L46758
%7H77%KGH77
5I7GL3A;&OC?:A%A;&OC?%BQYO%QA?,C A;O7646L46758
%7H77%9KH97
5I7GLG?QRA?P?QRA?P,C;O7646L46758
%7H77%577H77
5I7GL9?N :QA?N NO%PY%:QAAO?PN 7646L46758
%7H77%5T39KH77
5I7GLK?,MC N?,M,CM A%C NO% ,NUPCQNS7646L46758
%7H77%IKH6I
5I7GLI,BQAO,BQAO%QA;7646L46758
%7H77%5T8G5H77
5I7GLLZQB?;PZ/**/'@$%? #$@'"%Q" 7646L46758
%5T39KH77%599T9L3H78
C+D -#%N #'*%_9G% 2+ <$`.
&%;2+ <$%)(%='#+%>%?!@@'-(%)(%;2+ <%A!@)+-%_34546758%%8.79% :`&'E+%6
!"#$%&'(')*+
,-+ .%/+#'0*1,-+ .$
2$+34%56'$-)!3"
&30"#+54%7897:9;7:<%1%%<4;7% =
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
>&7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:@A71B877/30C+3%D'E+#(%1%B%-3%3+E3+$-+3% !3$+%B77F77
>&%B77F77
,%G%HI JKLM%NO%MIP>MI7;9;?9;7:<Q77177771B@87K"5! +3%N* 6+3R%,!3 !0#%N '35%:R77@F77
,%G%HI JKLM%NO%MIP>MI%:R77@F77
*S-'T3'S-0 $% !3 3'%UB<;7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:8;71B8B7$-0SS0"T% $#$%E 3%*+'C+%3+V!+$#$%:8F7B
*S-'T3'S-0 $% !3 3'%UB<;%:8F7B
=I>K, L%JK>I%/KDJ>KN2JP>D%KL,7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:@@71B:;7::Q9::;W%HI>%&PXI>%DJ;%DJ%J> KWI>%;AAF?7
=I>K, L%JK>I%/KDJ>KN2JP>D%KL,%;AAF?7
$S+"%IV!0SY+"#7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:8;71B:;7D+'*%Z0#%8QQFQ:
$S+"%IV!0SY+"#%8QQFQ:
N, 7;9;:9;7:<:7:1::;71B877N' .T3 !"5%K"C+$#0T'#0 "%:@F77
N, 7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:;;71B877N' .T3 !"5%K"C+$#0T'#0 "%88F;@
N, 7;9;?9;7:<:7:1::;71B877N' .T3 !"5%K"C+$#0T'#0 "%:@F77
N, %A8F;@
NI>>O%,P\[\[II%,P=& LO7;9;?9;7:<:7:1::Q71B::7, EE++%A@<FA<
NI>>O%,P\[\[II%,P=& LO%A@<FA<
N *5#%W(""+##+7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:@A718A8Q>+E!"5%1%,*'$$0 %L'$-C0**+%> '5$- 6%UA:<:F:7?%Q:F77
N *5#%W(""+##+%Q:F77
N **0T%G%D "$R%K" F7;9;?9;7:<?:@1?;7;1;7;BI3 $0 "%I$ 3 6%1%8Q8?%H0 . 3(%> '5%@77F77
N **0T%G%D "$R%K" F%@77F77
, DINII>%\\ ,PN7;9;?9;7:<Q77177771B8Q7=L%X'#+3%\]!'*#0(%J3'0"0"T%W!" -%:7F77
, DINII>%\\ ,PN%:7F77
,ILJI>&PKLJ%ILI>MO%=KLLIM D,P7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:;;71B8;7T'$% -'3T+$%:R::AF:7
,ILJI>&PKLJ%ILI>MO%=KLLIM D,P7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:@871B8;7T'$% -'3T+$%BA?F<A
,ILJI>&PKLJ%ILI>MO%=KLLIM D,P7;9;:9;7:<:7:1::;71B8;7T'$% -'3T+$%:77F??
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1,-+ .$%^7897:9;7:<%1%%<4;7% =_&'T+%:% E%@
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
,ILJI>&PKLJ%ILI>MO%=KLLIM D,P%:RA?@F<B
,P>I%G%= KL%W&7;9;?9;7:<Q77177771B@@7P1>0"T$%::@F<A
,P>I%G%= KL%W&%::@F<A
, !"#3($05+%`+#+30"'3(%,*0"0 %&WW,7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:;A71B877N '350"TR%Ia'Y$R%D- #$%BB;FA7
, !"#3($05+%`+#+30"'3(%,*0"0 %&WW,7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:;A71B877KYS !"5%K"#'.+R%N '350"T1KYS !"5%ABF77
, !"#3($05+%`+#+30"'3(%,*0"0 %&WW,7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:;A71B877KYS !"5R%Ia'YR%D- #$%:<BF?A
, !"#3($05+%`+#+30"'3(%,*0"0 %&WW,%Q7:FBA
IHWI>D%G% DDP,K JID%KL,7;9;:9;7:<Q77177771B8772#0*0#(%>'#+%D#!5(%@;7F?8
IHWI>D%G% DDP,K JID%KL,7;9;:9;7:<Q7:177771B8772#0*0#(%>'#+%D#!5(%@;7F?8
IHWI>D%G% DDP,K JID%KL,7;9;:9;7:<Q;7177771B8772#0*0#(%>'#+%D#!5(%@;7F?B
IHWI>D%G% DDP,K JID%KL,%:R@A;F@7
\[ ,JP>O%=PJP>%& >JD%,P=& LO7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:;@71B:B7/IW%?A&D%S'3#%?8F8A
\[ ,JP>O%=PJP>%& >JD%,P=& LO%?8F8A
\[*++#&305+R%K" F7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:8Q71B:Q7\[*!05%/0+$+*%Ia-'!$#%@@%T'** "%:8@FAA
\[*++#&305+R%K" F7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:8Q71B:Q7\[*!05%/0+$+*%Ia-'!$#%@@%T'** "%:8?F8Q
\[*++#&305+R%K" F7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:8;71B:B7/+* % *#+3%:;`%:A7 %H0"T+%="#%:@BF<<
\[*++#&305+R%K" F7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:8;71B:B7>0Y%,*'YSR%K"1) !"5%E3+0T-#%;@7F7A
\[*++#&305+R%K" F%AQ<F7?
M %M(Y"'$#0 $7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:@8Q1B877T(Y"'$#0 $% *'$$%:9:<1;9:A%<B@F77
M %M(Y"'$#0 $7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:@8?1B877T(Y"'$#0 $% *'$$%:9:<1;9:A%8AQF@7
M %M(Y"'$#0 $%:R8:;F@7
M3+'#%X'#+3$%\[0"'" 0'*7;9;?9;7:<:7:177771;7;:>+E!"5%> Y%>+"#'*%:7F<<
M3+'#%X'#+3$%\[0"'" 0'*7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:@8:18A8:>+E!"5%> Y%>+"#'*%:B<F7:
M3+'#%X'#+3$%\[0"'" 0'*%:A7F77
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1::A71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%;AF8<
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:;@71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%:7@F@:
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:8:71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%Q:F?B
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:8;71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%::;FQA
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:@@71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%<@FB?
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:B;71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%?7F@7
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:B871B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%BF?:
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:8Q71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%B@F@<
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:@;71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%8@F<A
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:@871B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%:BFA:
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:@A71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%::F<<
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:A771B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%;@F8B
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:Q771B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%;F?;
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1::;71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%Q;F:7
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1::871B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%B<F;Q
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<;:7177771B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%:?FA7
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1,-+ .$%^7897:9;7:<%1%%<4;7% =_&'T+%;% E%@
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<Q;71Q;7:1B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%@FA?
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<Q;71Q;7;1B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%@FA?
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1::Q71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%:;FA:
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:;;71B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%B8F:B
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<Q7:177771B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%A?FQ7
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<Q77177771B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%<BF@A
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(7;9;?9;7:<Q;7177771B7B7='3%;7:<%0"$!3'" +%S3+Y0!Y%;:F?8
H'3#E 35%W0E+%'"5% 05+"#%K"$!3'" +%, YS'"(%:R7;@FQQ
HILLI&KL%,P2LJO7;9;?9;7:<:7:17777187:7;7:?%E0"'*%$+##*+Y+"#%Q8FA7
HILLI&KL%,P2LJO7;9;?9;7:<B;717777187:7;7:?%E0"'*%$+##*+Y+"#%7FA:
HILLI&KL%,P2LJO7;9;?9;7:<8A<17777187:7;7:?%E0"'*%$+##*+Y+"#%8F7:
HILLI&KL%,P2LJO7;9;?9;7:<A7:17777187:7;7:?%E0"'*%$+##*+Y+"#%;F@:
HILLI&KL%,P2LJO7;9;?9;7:<B7717777187:7;7:?%E0"'*%$+##*+Y+"#%@F;8
HILLI&KL%,P2LJO7;9;?9;7:<8Q717777187:7;7:?%E0"'*%$+##*+Y+"#%8F7Q
HILLI&KL%,P2LJO%??F78
K,= %>IJK>I=ILJ% L/%J>2DJ1B@Q7;9;?9;7:<:7:177771;77<89:9:<%K/%U87B878%:R:8@FB;
K,= %>IJK>I=ILJ% L/%J>2DJ1B@Q7;9;?9;7:<;:7177771;77<89:9:<%K/%U87B878%;@F77
K,= %>IJK>I=ILJ% L/%J>2DJ1B@Q7;9;?9;7:<Q77177771;77<89:9:<%K/%U87B878%:@;F@7
K,= %>IJK>I=ILJ% L/%J>2DJ1B@Q7;9;?9;7:<Q7:177771;77<89:9:<%K/%U87B878%:@;F@7
K,= %>IJK>I=ILJ% L/%J>2DJ1B@Q7;9;?9;7:<Q;7177771;77<89:9:<%K/%U87B878%:F;@
K,= %>IJK>I=ILJ% L/%J>2DJ1B@Q%:RBAAFAQ
KL/2DJ>K W%WKMHJKLM%D2&&WO%KL,7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:8Q71B@:7W'YS- *5+3R%N'**'$#$%8?7F:@
KL/2DJ>K W%WKMHJKLM%D2&&WO%KL,%8?7F:@
K2PI%W '*%UB<7;9;?9;7:<:7:177771;77B&>%N'# -%77B7:F78F;7:<%W '*%B<%5!+$%@::F@<
K2PI%W '*%UB<7;9;?9;7:<Q77177771;77B&>%N'# -%77B7:F78F;7:<%W '*%B<%5!+$%:A:F8;
K2PI%W '*%UB<7;9;?9;7:<Q7:177771;77B&>%N'# -%77B7:F78F;7:<%W '*%B<%5!+$%A;F7<
K2PI%W '*%UB<%Q8@F77
\\ -"$ "%='3( ""7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:@A718A8Q>+E!"5%1% "% EE'03% E%#-+%H+'3#1`'*+"#0"+b$%/'(%&'3#(%UA:<:F:7Q%:8F77
\\ -"$ "%='3( ""%:8F77
WI M2I%P\[%=KLLIDPJ %,KJKID7;9;:9;7:<Q;7177771B8A7=L%,0#0+$%D# 3Y6'#+3%, '*0#0 "%, "#30)!#0 "$%<<BF77
WI M2I%P\[%=KLLIDPJ %,KJKID%<<BF77
= //IL%M W LJI>%H LDIL%WW&7;9;:9;7:<:7:1::B71B87;W') 3%>+*'#0 "$%D+3C0 +$%$C %#-3 !T-%:98:9;7:<%<?F?@
= //IL%M W LJI>%H LDIL%WW&%<?F?@
= Z+$$ "%=+50 '*1D!3T0 '*%K" 7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:;;71B:87M* C+$%:B;F?Q
= Z+$$ "%=+50 '*1D!3T0 '*%K" %:B;F?Q
=K/%,P2LJO%,PP&7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:8Q71B:Q7X0"#+3%/0+$+*%/(+5%QR:?8F;7
=K/%,P2LJO%,PP&7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:8Q71B:Q7L %W+'5%M'$ *0"+%?R;8:FB?
=K/%,P2LJO%,PP&7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:8Q71B:Q7L %W+'5%M'$ *0"+R%X0"#+3%/0+$+*%\[!+*%:QR:Q:F?8
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1,-+ .$%^7897:9;7:<%1%%<4;7% =_&'T+%8% E%@
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
=K/%,P2LJO%,PP&%8;R@?AF@:
=0"!#+Y'"%&3+$$7;9;:9;7:<:7:1::Q71B::7)!$0"+$$% '35$%1%D%\[*'T$#'5%:AF77
=0"!#+Y'"%&3+$$7;9;:9;7:<:7:1::Q71B::7/ 3%H'"T+3$%1%I>%X'#+3%D-!#5 6"R%L #0 +%2"0E 3Y%, 5+%8Q8F77
=0"!#+Y'"%&3+$$7;9;?9;7:<:7:1::Q71B::7N!$0"+$$%,'35$%1%/ "%L!##+3%:AF77
=0"!#+Y'"%&3+$$%B7@F77
=L%/I&J%P\[%HI WJH7;9;?9;7:<Q77177771B@7<X'#+3%D!SS*(%D+3C0 +%, ""+ #0 "%\[++%:9:9:<1898:9:<%:8R;@;F77
=L%/I&J%P\[%HI WJH%:8R;@;F77
=L%L,&I>D%WK\[I%KLD2> L,I7;9;?9;7:<:7:177771;7::&>%N'# -%77B7:F78F;7:<%L,&I>D1W0E+%K"$!3'" +%BBF7:
=L%L,&I>D%WK\[I%KLD2> L,I7;9;?9;7:<Q77177771;7::&>%N'# -%77B7:F78F;7:<%L,&I>D1W0E+%K"$!3'" +%<FA7
=L%L,&I>D%WK\[I%KLD2> L,I7;9;?9;7:<Q7:177771;7::&>%N'# -%77B7:F78F;7:<%L,&I>D1W0E+%K"$!3'" +%<FA7
=L%L,&I>D%WK\[I%KLD2> L,I7;9;?9;7:<Q;7177771;7::&>%N'# -%77B7:F78F;7:<%L,&I>D1W0E+%K"$!3'" +%7FQ<
=L%L,&I>D%WK\[I%KLD2> L,I%ABF77
=P>JPL%D WJ7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:8;71B:@7D'E+1J1D'*#%:RQB;F8:
=P>JPL%D WJ%:RQB;F8:
=JK%/KDJ>KN2JKLM%KL,7;9;:9;7:<B77177771BQ7@M3 !"5Y'$#+3%B7771/%ABR;:AFQ:
=JK%/KDJ>KN2JKLM%KL,%ABR;:AFQ:
&+#+3$+"%,-+*$+'7;9;:9;7:<:7:1::;71B8?7=0*+'T+%B77FA;
&+#+3$+"%,-+*$+'7;9;:9;7:<:7:1::;71B8?7=0*+'T+%:A7FQ<
&+#+3$+"%,-+*$+'7;9;:9;7:<:7:1::;71B8Q7 &=&%, "E+3+" +%1%3+T0$#3'#0 "%;7F77
&+#+3$+"%,-+*$+'%@?:FB:
&PDJ= DJI>7;9;Q9;7:<Q77177771B887\[+)3!'3(%2#0*0#(%D#'#+Y+"#$%88BF8?
&PDJ= DJI>7;9;Q9;7:<Q7:177771B887\[+)3!'3(%2#0*0#(%D#'#+Y+"#$%88BF8?
&PDJ= DJI>%AA?FQA
> KLNPX%J>II%,P=& LO7;9;:9;7:<Q;71Q;7;1B877X0"#+3%&'3.$%&3!"0"T%1%,!33(%\['3Y$%:R:AAF7:
> KLNPX%J>II%,P=& LO7;9;:9;7:<Q;71Q;7;1B877X0"#+3%&'3.$%&3!"0"T%1%D!T'3)!$-%:RB??F77
> KLNPX%J>II%,P=& LO7;9;:9;7:<Q;71Q;7;1B877X0"#+3%&'3.$%&3!"0"T%1%& 6+3-0**%:RQ;;F?7
> KLNPX%J>II%,P=& LO7;9;:9;7:<Q;71Q;7;1B877X0"#+3%&'3.$%&3!"0"T%1%=0""+6'$-#'%H+0T-#$%8R@:@F<Q
> KLNPX%J>II%,P=& LO7;9;:9;7:<Q;71Q;7;1B877X0"#+3%&'3.$%&3!"0"T%1%=+'5 6%M3++"%BR<<?FQ@
> KLNPX%J>II%,P=& LO%:;R?<:F@8
>'$Y!$$+"%=0 - "7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:@8<1B877,-'03%O T'%B:<:F::;%B7?F77
>'$Y!$$+"%=0 - "%B7?F77
DKMLDP2>,I7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:;;71B:;7\[\[%H+*Y+#%M3'S-0 $%@:AF@7
DKMLDP2>,I7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:@A71B:87>+S*' +Y+"#%"'Y+%S*'#+%1%=%N*'c'"0"%@AF@7
DKMLDP2>,I%@Q8F77
D0""0T+3%/ "7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:8;71B:@7='0*) a%& $#%= !"#%, Y) %1%3+S*' +%5'Y'T+%;@F77
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1,-+ .$%^7897:9;7:<%1%%<4;7% =_&'T+%B% E%@
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
D0""0T+3%/ "%;@F77
D !#-6+$#%D!)!3)'"%&!)*0$-0"T7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:::71B8B7S30"#0"T9'5C+3#0$0"T%:RAQ<F;7
D !#-6+$#%D!)!3)'"%&!)*0$-0"T7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:8:71B8B7S30"#0"T9'5C+3#0$0"T%ABF77
D !#-6+$#%D!)!3)'"%&!)*0$-0"T7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:B:71B8B7S30"#0"T9'5C+3#0$0"T%@BFB7
D !#-6+$#%D!)!3)'"%&!)*0$-0"T7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:A::1B8B7S30"#0"T9'5C+3#0$0"T%Q;;F77
D !#-6+$#%D!)!3)'"%&!)*0$-0"T7;9;:9;7:<A7:1A78?1B8B7S30"#0"T9'5C+3#0$0"T%@:F;7
D !#-6+$#%D!)!3)'"%&!)*0$-0"T7;9;:9;7:<Q771Q7@71B8B7S30"#0"T9'5C+3#0$0"T%1%X17A:%:Q<F;7
D !#-6+$#%D!)!3)'"%&!)*0$-0"T%;RQ@7F77
DJ JI%P\[%=KLLIDPJ 7;9;?9;7:<Q771Q7:<1B@@7=L%H'c'35 !$%='#+30'*$% #%\[++R%,-+Y0 '*%K"C+"# 3(%\[++%:77F77
DJ JI%P\[%=KLLIDPJ %:77F77
D2N2>N L%> JI% 2JHP>KJO7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:8:71B877;7:<%=+Y)+3$-0S%1%:$#%-'*E%:R8@AF77
D2N2>N L%> JI% 2JHP>KJO%:R8@AF77
D!**0C'"%&'#30 0'7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:@A718A8Q>+E!"5%1% "% EE'03% E%#-+%H+'3#4%`'*+"#0"+b$%/'(%&'3#(%:8F77
D!**0C'"%&'#30 0'%:8F77
J-+3Y+ -7;9;?9;7:<B77177771B@:7K"$!*'#0 "% YS*+#+%1%W=,%,*'0Y%QR877F77
J-+3Y+ -%QR877F77
J30+#-'3#%/++ ""7;9;:9;7:<:7:1:;@71B:;7\[03$#% 05%$!SS*0+$%;7F<A
J30+#-'3#%/++ ""%;7F<A
2WKLI%KL,7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:A771B:87X-0#+%M3 +3(%N'T$%QAF;Q
2WKLI%KL,%QAF;Q
X0**0'Y$%D #$Y'"%K" 7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:A:Q1BB:7B;a:;%= )0*+%PEE0 +%1%:9:;9:<%# %;9::9:<%ABQF77
X0**0'Y$%D #$Y'"%K" 7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:A:Q1BB:7B;a:;%= )0*+%PEE0 +%1%:9:;9:<%# %;9::9:<%ABQF77
X0**0'Y$%D #$Y'"%K" 7;9;?9;7:<:7:1:A:Q1BB:7B;a:;%= )0*+%PEE0 +%1%:9:;9:<%# %;9::9:<%ABQF77
X0**0'Y$%D #$Y'"%K" %:R<B:F77
%:@@R@?8F7<
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1,-+ .$%^7897:9;7:<%1%%<4;7% =_&'T+%@% E%@
!"#$%&'(')*+
,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2
3$+45%67'$-)!4"
&40"#+65%89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
9@/%A B@%CD EF& @D8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;>;91H988C!II+4%C.'#+) '46%, "#+$#%J%,-'"%C.'#+&'4.% "%K:9:;=%L88M88
9@/%A B@%CD EF& @D%L88M88
I+%E *$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;9<81H<>8BIN' #%O4+" -%7:P40 #0 "%9;=M==
I+%E *$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;9<81H<>8O' .+4%Q+!$ "%B"#+4"'*%R0)4'# 4%KGKM==
I+%E *$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;9<81H<>8O' .+4%Q+!$ "%B"#+4"'*%R0)4'# 41KGKM==
I+%E *$%9;=M==
04%?+ -'"0 '*8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;LL81H9882 #%C!4S' +%BT"0# 4%<>9M88
04%?+ -'"0 '*8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;LL81H988UF?%BT"0# 4%;;8M88
04%?+ -'"0 '*%9K9M88
*120*7'"0%V!*08<:<G:<8;=;8;1;L991H988&+4$ "'*%E4'0"0"T%<GLM88
*120*7'"0%V!*0%<GLM88
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;K81H;;8 (*0 %X'** #%X Y%>;M==
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;K81H;;8UN+"%F"6%,'#'* T%F"Z+* N+$%;<M==
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<<81H<=8E'IN+4%$+'*$:\[0N%#0+$\\%C- +%'"6%X #%, Z+4$%<>M>;
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L981H;<8C '*+%=8M<9
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=K881K8H91HL;8O0"6 7%E0"#%P0*I%>=MK=
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=K881K8H91H;L8,'4#406T+%<KM>8
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89C!4S' +%) .% -'4T+4%==M=L
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;>81HL98&'66*+% "#+""'\\%O+) 'I%>;M=G
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89?0#+*%B&%&- "+$\\%, 46*+$$%2+'6$+#$%;\\=L>MGH
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89 4!)'%C70# -%;\\8<KM>;
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;>81H;L8,')*+%E0+$\\%X4 #-+4%E'N+$%=LM;>
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89,'" "%?0 4 N- "+%9==M88
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89,')*+%&!" -%/ 7"%C#'"6%>M==
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89 4!)'% +$$%& 0"#$%;\\HL=ML8
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89D+($# "+%V' .\\%? 6!*'4%&*!T%X4+'. !#% 6'N#+4%;;KMKG
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89/+**%A'#0#!6+%;H%@!TT+6%LH;H:;H%BL%;\\GGKM==
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;>81H;L89%N' .% S%I !$+%N'6$%;8M==
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89?DK;8%O04+*+$$%.+() '46%I !$+% I) %;KHM8>
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89<H%0" -%I "0# 4$%G9=M=>
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89 ')*+$\\%0N'6%6 .%L8MHG
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;9;81H;<86'0*(%N*'""+4\\% 4'( "$%9<M>;
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89 6'N#+4\\%N 4#% ')*+%99M;H
I'W "8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89/+**%$N+'.+4%)'4$%==M=<
I'W "%G\\>H9M;K
I+40 '"%P'I0*(%A0S+% $$!4'" +%, IN'"(% S%, *!I)!$8<:<G:<8;=;8;188881<88GP+)4!'4(%<8;=%N4+I0!I%9=MKG
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2%\]89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?^&'T+%;% S%;8
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
I+40 '"%P'I0*(%A0S+% $$!4'" +%, IN'"(% S%, *!I)!$%9=MKG
I+40 '"%A+T0 "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<<81H<=8,-0+S%*!" -%I++#0"T%9<MGH
I+40 '"%A+T0 "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;<81H9K8X4+'.S'$#%I++#0"T%70#-%O 4.I'"%_%,'**0$#+4%9LM88
I+40 '"%A+T0 "%>KMGH
I+40 '"%&*'""0"T% $$ 0'#0 "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;H<81H9K8<8;=%Q'#0 "'*%&*'""0"T%, "S+4+" +%K9LM88
I+40 '"%&*'""0"T% $$ 0'#0 "%K9LM88
Q,U?%EF,2QB, A%,FQEF@8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;<<81HL9;@+N*' +I+"#%3CX%& 4#%, Z%LHML8
Q,U?%EF,2QB, A%,FQEF@8<:<G:<8;=H881H;<K1HK8L`L%/!'*%X'"6%R2P%&'T+4$%'"6%/+$.# N%,-'4T+4$%;;\\>K8M88
Q,U?%EF,2QB, A%,FQEF@%;;\\K<HML8
X (+4%E4! .%&'4#$8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9<81H;H8&0N+1FY-'!$#\\%X4' +\\%U0*%C+'*\\%/!$#%C-0+*6%LH>MKG
X (+4%E4! .%&'4#$8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9<81H;H8&0N+1FY-'!$#%;>9MK<
X (+4%E4! .%&'4#$%K;8ML8
,'4-'4##8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H<H8AC%#1$-04#$\\%a+'"$\\%$7+'#$-04#%;=HM=H
,'4-'4##%;=HM=H
,'40) !%, SS++8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;<81H9K8@+ 4!0#I+"#%I++#0"T%1% SS++%>M88
,'40) !%, SS++%>M88
,'4Z+4%, !"#(8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;;>81H9<8,'4Z+4A0".%B"#+4"+#:P0)+4%1%P+)%<8;=%LH8M88
,'4Z+4%, !"#(8<:<;:<8;=K881K8H91H9<8/'4.%P0)+4%OOE&%1%P+)%<8;=%9L8M88
,'4Z+4%, !"#(8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;LL81H;L8E4+'#+6%C'*#%L\\GLLM8H
,'4Z+4%, !"#(%>\\KHLM8H
,/O%` Z+4"I+"#8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89,'I+4'%6 I+%I !"#0"T%.0#%;8;M<>
,/O%` Z+4"I+"#8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89,'I+4'%I !"#0"T%)4' .+#%G>M<L
,/O%` Z+4"I+"#8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;>81H<>8C+40'*%Q!**%? 6+4"%'6'N#+4%;8M;H
,/O%` Z+4"I+"#8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;>81H<>8X*' .%X Y%/X=%$+40'*%'6'N#+4$%<;M>=
,/O%` Z+4"I+"#%<;=M9H
,-'"-'$$+"%/0""+4%E-+'#4+8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L>81H9882 *06'(%B""%#0 .+#$%;\\L88M88
,-'"-'$$+"%/0""+4%E-+'#4+8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L>81H9882 *06'(%B""%#0 .+#$%;\\H>HM;L
,-'"-'$$+"%/0""+4%E-+'#4+8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L>81H9882 *06'(%B""%#0 .+#$%9;>MKL
,-'"-'$$+"%/0""+4%E-+'#4+%9\\<G8M=8
, ) 4"b$%/+*0Z+4$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;;81H9K8,0#(%, !" 0*%1%O'#+4%G=MK8
, ) 4"b$%/+*0Z+4$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;K81H;;8C 'N\\%,4+'I+4$\\% 04%P4+$-"+4$\\%E0$$!+$%>=MK>
, ) 4"b$%/+*0Z+4$%;L=MH>
, * "0'*%A0S+%_% 06+"#%B"$!4'" +%, 8<:<G:<8;=K8;188881<88GP+)4!'4(%<8;=%N4+I0!I%9>M=9
, * "0'*%A0S+%_% 06+"#%B"$!4'" +%, 8<:<G:<8;=;8;188881<88GP+)4!'4(%<8;=%N4+I0!I%>8MK<
, * "0'*%A0S+%_% 06+"#%B"$!4'" +%, 8<:<G:<8;=K88188881<88GP+)4!'4(%<8;=%N4+I0!I%9>M=9
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2%\]89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?^&'T+%<% S%;8
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
, * "0'*%A0S+%_% 06+"#%B"$!4'" +%, %;9HMLG
,!)%P 6$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<<81H<=8, .0+$%1%@ .0+%U40+"#'#0 "%"0T-#%<8MHG
,!)%P 6$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L>81H988P4!0#\\%?!SS0"$\\%,'.+%<GMHH
,!)%P 6$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L>81H;98`0S#%,'46$%K8M88
,!)%P 6$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L>81H;98A!" -%+Z+"#%1%N'$#'\\%)+'"$\\%#!4.+(\\%N4 6! +%HKMLG
,!)%P 6$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L>81H988P4!0#\\%,'.+%=M=K
,!)%P 6$%;K>MHK
,!$# IB".M I8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L981H9KLAC%E1$-04#$%1%C0*Z+4%C"+'.+4$%&4 I %;>=MK<
,!$# IB".M I%;>=MK<
/+*#'%/+"#'*8<:<;:<8;=;8;188881<8;9?'4 -%0"$!4'" +%N4+I0!I%;\\>H9MHL
/+*#'%/+"#'*8<:<;:<8;=;8;188881<8;9?'4 -%0"$!4'" +%N4+I0!I%1% )4'%>8MH8
/+*#'%/+"#'*8<:<;:<8;=K88188881<8;9?'4 -%0"$!4'" +%N4+I0!I%<<8M9L
/+*#'%/+"#'*8<:<;:<8;=K8;188881<8;9?'4 -%0"$!4'" +%N4+I0!I%;=8M;>
/+*#'%/+"#'*8<:<;:<8;=K<8188881<8;9?'4 -%0"$!4'" +%N4+I0!I%;8>MHH
/+*#'%/+"#'*%<\\<<8MG8
/ I0" b$%&0WW'8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H;L87'#+4I'0"%)4+'.%1%S4 "#0+4%#4'0*%9KMKH
/ I0" b$%&0WW'%9KMKH
/!"T'4++$8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H<H8&'"#$\\%V+'"$\\%X #$%;K<MHG
/!"T'4++$8<:;L:<8;=K8;188881H<H8&'"#$\\%V+'"$\\%X #$%;K<MHK
/!"T'4++$%9HHM=L
FI+4T+" (%@+$N "$+%C *!#0 "$8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;<<81H;<8U1@0"T%9GMGG
FI+4T+" (%@+$N "$+%C *!#0 "$%9GMGG
F"Z04 E+ -%C+4Z0 +$%B" M8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;9<81H;L8,'* 0!I%,-* 406+%;\\8<HM8G
F"Z04 E+ -%C+4Z0 +$%B" M%;\\8<HM8G
FN0 %CN 4#$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L981H;<8P 'I%X 7*0"T%&0"$%H<M>9
FN0 %CN 4#$%H<M>9
P' +) .8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L981H9KL2 *06'(% 6%X !#0c!+%<LM<=
P' +) .%<LM<=
P0)+4UN#0 M I8<:;L:<8;=H881H;<>1HK89P0)+4%UN#0 %?+#+4%9;LM88
P0)+4UN#0 M I%9;LM88
P06+*0#(%C+ !40#(%A0S+8<:<G:<8;=;8;188881<88KR0$0 "%0"$!4'" +%1%?'4 -%<8;=%;><M=L
P06+*0#(%C+ !40#(%A0S+8<:<G:<8;=K88188881<88KR0$0 "%0"$!4'" +%1%?'4 -%<8;=%;8M;G
P06+*0#(%C+ !40#(%A0S+8<:<G:<8;=K8;188881<88KR0$0 "%0"$!4'" +%1%?'4 -%<8;=%HM89
P06+*0#(%C+ !40#(%A0S+8<:<G:<8;=K<8188881<88KR0$0 "%0"$!4'" +%1%?'4 -%<8;=18MK9
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2%\]89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?^&'T+%9% S%;8
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
P06+*0#(%C+ !40#(%A0S+%;K>MH9
PU@,F% ?F@B, %BQ,8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;LL81H;<8<HM8 061<%X *#% 1;1;:Hd%.+(+6%1%e;8%$#'TT+4+6%N 4#$%K9GM8L
PU@,F% ?F@B, %BQ,%K9GM8L
P4+$-7'#+48<:;L:<8;=;8;1;9;81H9K8<8;=%@ '6%C'*#%C(IN%@+T0$#4'#0 "%1%,%X!4.+%;HLM88
P4+$-7'#+48<:;L:<8;=;8;1;9;81H9K8<8;=%@ '6%C'*#%C(IN%@+T0$#4'#0 "%1%@%&0".'**'%;HLM88
P4+$-7'#+4%<=8M88
` Z+4"I+"#%P0"'" +%USS0 +4$% $$ 0'#0 "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;981H9K8 ""!'*%`PU %, "S+4+" +%H<8M88
` Z+4"I+"#%P0"'" +%USS0 +4$% $$ 0'#0 "%H<8M88
2' -%, IN'"(8<:;L:<8;=K881K8H91HLL8,-* 40"+%@+'T+"#\\%,-+I.+(%@+T+"#$%H9>M<K
2' -%, IN'"(%H9>M<K
2+'*#-(D0"M I8<:;L:<8;=K881K8;=1H;L8&'N+4%# 7+*$\\%# 0*+#%N'N+4%;GHMKL
2+'*#-(D0"M I%;GHMKL
2UBCBQ`EUQ%DUF`AF@%`@U3&8<:<;:<8;=H;8188881H988&4 a%8;G18K<%A'.+% ""%&'4.%FYN'"$0 "%1%$Z %S4 I%V'"%<8;=%K\\9L8M88
2UBCBQ`EUQ%DUF`AF@%`@U3&%K\\9L8M88
2 I+%/+N #8<:;L:<8;=K881K8;=1HL;8/ 4%,* $+4\\%P 'I%C+'*'"#%;==M>9
2 I+%/+N #8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;LL81H;<8&*(7 6\\%&'0"#\\%`*!+\\%,-'0"\\%C'7\\%/40**:BIN' #%D0#%H<GM>H
2 I+%/+N #8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H<>8E 4 -%2+'6\\%,(*0"6+4\\%E *%X'T%L<MH<
2 I+%/+N #8<:;L:<8;=K881K8;=1H;L8,')*+%E0+$\\%O04+%@ N+%;HM8;
2 I+%/+N #8<:;L:<8;=K8;188881HLL;&R,%X!$-0"T\\%, !N*0"T%GM9<
2 I+%/+N #8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;9<81H<>82'II+4%/40**:BIN' #%/40Z+4%, I) %<>KM9>
2 I+%/+N #8<:;L:<8;=K881K8H91H;L8/+#+4T+"#\\%`4+'$+%T!"\\%@!$#%@+I Z+4%=;M<=
2 I+%/+N #%;\\8>;M>K
2 !*0-'"b$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;;81H9K8f+'4%+"6%74'N%!N%70#-% M %6+N#%-+'6$%KGM88
2 !*0-'"b$%KGM88
2(64'!*0 %O 4*68<:;L:<8;=;8;1;9<81H;<8I0$ %N'4#$:$!NN*0+$%9H8MHH
2(64'!*0 %O 4*6%9H8MHH
2(64 , /%C S#7'4+%C *!#0 "$%AA,8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;9;81H9>8A0 +"$+%HLM88
2(64 , /%C S#7'4+%C *!#0 "$%AA,%HLM88
BDF 8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L981H;<8@+ %,+"#+4%P4'I+$%<L;M;8
BDF %<L;M;8
B"" Z'#0Z+%USS0 +%C *!#0 "$%AA,8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;;K81H;;8,'* !*'# 4%4 **%N'N+4%KM;<
B"" Z'#0Z+%USS0 +%C *!#0 "$%AA,8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;;K81H;;8P0*+$\\%&'N+4\\%&!$-%N0"$\\%?'4.+4$%;>8M8G
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2%\]89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?^&'T+%H% S%;8
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
B"" Z'#0Z+%USS0 +%C *!#0 "$%AA,%;>KM<8
B"#+4"'#0 "'*%, 6+%, !" 0*8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<L81H9K8<8;=%B,,%3NN+4%`4+'#%&*'0"$%@+T0 "%@+T0$#4'#0 "%1%V%D+ T-%<=8M88
B"#+4"'#0 "'*%, 6+%, !" 0*8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<L81H9K8<8;=%B,,%3NN+4%`4+'#%&*'0"$%@+T0 "%@+T0$#4'#0 "%1%&%F.- *I%<=8M88
B"#+4"'#0 "'*%, 6+%, !" 0*8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<L81H9K8<8;=%B,,%3NN+4%`4+'#%&*'0"$%@+T0 "%@+T0$#4'#0 "%1%F%E+$$I'"%<=8M88
B"#+4"'#0 "'*%, 6+%, !" 0*8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<L81H9K8<8;=%B,,%3NN+4%`4+'#%&*'0"$%@+T0 "%@+T0$#4'#0 "%1%X%C!**0Z'"%<=8M88
B"#+4"'#0 "'*%, 6+%, !" 0*8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<L81H9K8<8;=%B,,%3NN+4%`4+'#%&*'0"$%@+T0 "%@+T0$#4'#0 "%1%V%2+06+*)+4T+4%;HLM88
B"#+4"'#0 "'*%, 6+%, !" 0*8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<L81H9>8,+40S0 '#+%4+"+7'*$%S 4%#-+%"+Y#%9%(+'4$%;<LM88
B"#+4"'#0 "'*%, 6+%, !" 0*%;\\H98M88
V,&+""+(8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H<H8V+'"$%K=M=G
V,&+""+(8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H<H8O 4.%C-04#%98M88
V,&+""+(%;8=M=G
V -"%2+"4(%P $#+48<:;L:<8;=K881K8;=1H;<8\[+.$%/4'0"%P* '#%KLMH=
V -"%2+"4(%P $#+4%KLMH=
A!"6$%_%X(+4*(b$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;;81H9K8T '*%$+$$0 "%1%FTT%X'.+%9>M<H
A!"6$%_%X(+4*(b$%9>M<H
?' (b$8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H<H8V+'"$\\%&'"#$\\%$-04#$%=;M9K
?' (b$8<:;L:<8;=K8;188881H<H8V+'"$\\%&'"#$\\%$-04#$%=;M9K
?' (b$%;G<MKH
?+"'46$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<<81H<=8P *60"T%D"0S+%<;M>9
?+"'46$%<;M>9
?FE@U&UABE Q%PU@/8<:<G:<8;=K8;188881H;H8;;;9%D0#%1%V+#%;;MH8
?FE@U&UABE Q%PU@/%;;MH8
?0**$%P*++#%P'4I8<:;L:<8;=K8;188881H<H8E1$-04#$\\%V+'"$\\%,4+7%<=M;G
?0**$%P*++#%P'4I8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H<H8E1$-04#$\\%V+'"$\\%,4+7%<=M;G
?0**$%P*++#%P'4I%LGM9>
?0""+$ #'%Q!4$+4(%'"6%A'"6$ 'N+8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H9K8Q 4#-+4"%`4++"%<8;=%9<KM88
?0""+$ #'%Q!4$+4(%'"6%A'"6$ 'N+%9<KM88
?0""+$ #'%@!4'*%O'#+4% $$ 0'#0 "8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H9K8,*'$$%1%?'4 -%L1K\\%<8;=%<=8M88
?0""+$ #'%@!4'*%O'#+4% $$ 0'#0 "8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H9K8@+S!"6%S 4% *'$$%1%I+I)+41L8M88
?0""+$ #'%@!4'*%O'#+4% $$ 0'#0 "%<H8M88
?0""+$ #'%E4 N-0+$%_%`0S#$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;>;;1H;98,4' .+6%B +%#4 N-0+$%H;M<=
?0""+$ #'%E4 N-0+$%_%`0S#$%H;M<=
?Q%/+N#% S% T40 !*#!4+8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;LL81H9K8?/ %@+"+7'*%1%/%D $.+*'%;8M<<
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2%\]89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?^&'T+%L% S%;8
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
?Q%/+N#% S% T40 !*#!4+%;8M<<
?Q%R AAFf%FAF,E@B,%,UU&8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9L81H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%;9KMK>
?Q%R AAFf%FAF,E@B,%,UU&8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9L81H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%H9M8L
?Q%R AAFf%FAF,E@B,%,UU&8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9L81H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%;<;MHL
?Q%R AAFf%FAF,E@B,%,UU&%98<M<>
?3QB,B& A%,U/F%,U@&U@ EBUQ8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;;>81H988 ""!'*%- $#0"T%S++%1% 0#(% 6+%=88M88
?3QB,B& A%,U/F%,U@&U@ EBUQ%=88M88
Q & % 3EU%_%E@3,D%& @EC8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9<81H;<8I0$ %N'4#$:$!NN*0+$%>MLG
Q & % 3EU%_%E@3,D%& @EC%>MLG
Q 4#-+4"%E *gFc!0NI+"#8<:;L:<8;=K88188881HL982'"6%#4! .\\%`+"+4'# 4%;\\<89M;G
Q 4#-+4"%E *gFc!0NI+"#%;\\<89M;G
USS0 +%?'Y:USS0 +%/+N #8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;LL81H;<8& $#10#$\\%?'4.+4$\\%&+" 0*$\\%, 4.%X '46\\%E 7+*+##+$%K;M8;
USS0 +%?'Y:USS0 +%/+N #8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<<81H<=8X0"6+4$%H8ML=
USS0 +%?'Y:USS0 +%/+N #%;;;M>8
&'"+4'%X4+'68<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;;81H9K8,0#(%, !" 0*%/0""+4%;=8M;=
&'"+4'%X4+'6%;=8M;=
&'4#$%&+ N*+8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;>81HL98/+**%A'#0#!6+%4+N*' +I+"#%$ 4++"%;==M=L
&'4#$%&+ N*+%;==M=L
&+#+4$ "%X4 #-+4$%P!"+4'*%2 I+8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;;81H9K8P!"+4'*%P* 7+4$%S 4%E 66%2 SSI'"b$%S'#-+4%G<M;9
&+#+4$ "%X4 #-+4$%P!"+4'*%2 I+%G<M;9
&0 "++4%F"T0"++40"T\\%&M M8<:<;:<8;=>8;1>8H<1H988;;G;9<%A'.+%C!$'"%E4'0*%@+-')%1%$Z %#-4 !T-%;:9;:;=%9L8M88
&0 "++4%F"T0"++40"T\\%&M M%9L8M88
& #+"#0'%?Q%C *'48<:<G:<8;=;8;1;;=81H9<8/+ +I)+4%<8;G%;\\9L;M;K
& #+"#0'%?Q%C *'48<:<G:<8;=K88188881H9<8/+ +I)+4%<8;G%>LKMH<
& #+"#0'%?Q%C *'48<:<G:<8;=;8;1;;K81H9<8/+ +I)+4%<8;G%;\\8L=M<H
& #+"#0'%?Q%C *'4%9\\8>KMG9
& !"6+4b$%X'4%_%`40**8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;<81H9K8,'4Z+4%, !"#(%,0#(%?T4%I++#0"T%;GM88
& !"6+4b$%X'4%_%`40**%;GM88
& 7+4%C($#+I$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L981H;<8&!IN%C+#1X'4%U"*(\\%C0"T*+%`40N%2'"6*+%7:4 #'#0"T%-'"6*+%GKM8;
& 7+4%C($#+I$8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L981H;<8&!IN%C+#1X'4%U"*(\\%C0"T*+%`40N%2'"6*+%7:4 #'#0"T%-'"6*+%8M8;
& 7+4%C($#+I$%GKM8<
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2%\]89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?^&'T+%>% S%;8
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
&4+I0+4%C'S+#(8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H<H82 6+6%O'#+4N4 S%@+S*+ #0Z+%N'4.'%K9M>L
&4+I0+4%C'S+#(%K9M>L
&4 P* 7%/("'I0 $8<:;L:<8;=K881K8;=1H;L8, !N*+4\\% 6'N#+4%99M88
&4 P* 7%/("'I0 $%99M88
&4 1E+ %/+$0T"\\%B" M8<:<;:<8;=H881H;HG1HK89D+(S )\\%&4 Y.+(%BBB%H9;M88
&4 1E+ %/+$0T"\\%B" M%H9;M88
&!)*0 %C!4N*!$8<:;L:<8;=;8;188881<899U"*0"+% ! #0 "$%;;8M==
&!)*0 %C!4N*!$%;;8M==
@+6%O0"T%C# 4+8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<<81H<H888G9HF<;88%X*' .%) #$%1%/%V -"$ "%;LKMH=
@+6%O0"T%C# 4+8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<<81H<H888G9HF<;88%X*' .%) #$%1%/%Q!##+4%;LKMH=
@+6%O0"T%C# 4+%9;HM=G
@0Z+4S4 "#%&40"#0"T8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;>;;1H988<8;=%P0$-0"T% "#+$#%#0 .+#$%;HHM88
@0Z+4S4 "#%&40"#0"T%;HHM88
@ #'4(%,*!)8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L<81H9>8I "#-*(%6!+$%1%E%2 SSI'"%L9M88
@ #'4(%,*!)8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;<81H9>8I "#-*(%6!+$%1%E%`+4-'46#%L9M88
@ #'4(%,*!)%;8>M88
C'Ib$%,*!)8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L>81H988P4!0#\\%/+$$+4#\\%CN0"' -\\%U"0 "$%9;MHG
C'Ib$%,*!)%9;MHG
C+"$0)*+%A'"6%3$+%, '*0#0 "8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;H<81H9K8?'4.+#%@+ 'N%'"6%<8;=%P 4+ '$#%X4+'.S'$#:&4 T4'I%1%D% '"+"$ "%HGM88
C+"$0)*+%A'"6%3$+%, '*0#0 "%HGM88
C ('%C!$-0%_%`40**8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;<<81H<=8/0""+4%S 4%QfF% 4+7%K>M;9
C ('%C!$-0%_%`40**%K>M;9
C#'4%E40)!"+8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L981H9>8<8;=%Q+7$N'N+4%C!)$ 40N#0 "%H;8M<G
C#'4%E40)!"+%H;8M<G
C#'Z4 $%&4 N+4#0+$8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;LL81H988hH%<8;G%F'$+I+"#%S++$%S 4%N4 N+4#(%'6a' +"#%# %KG8L%`4+'#%&*'0"$%989MH<
C#'Z4 $%&4 N+4#0+$%989MH<
CE@ EU`3 @/%AA,8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;;>81H988&4 SN 0"#%FI'0*%P0*#+40"T%$+4Z0 +%1%?'4%<8;=%;>9M<8
CE@ EU`3 @/%AA,%;>9M<8
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;LL81H988 ""!'*%P04+%FY#0"T!0$-+4%?'0"#+"'" +%1%A'.+% ""%&'4.%9;<M88
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;;=81H988 ""!'*%P04+%FY#0"T!0$-+4%?'0"#+"'" +%1%A0)4'4(%KLM88
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;;K81H988 ""!'*%P04+%FY#0"T!0$-+4%?'0"#+"'" +%1%,0#(%2'**%;98M88
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2%\]89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?^&'T+%K% S%;8
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;<<81H988 ""!'*%P04+%FY#0"T!0$-+4%?'0"#+"'" +%1%P04+%/+N#%_%E4! .$%H==M88
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;<<81H988 ""!'*%P04+%FY#0"T!0$-+4%?'0"#+"'" +%1%P04+%/+N#%<9LM88
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;9K81H988 ""!'*%CN40".*+4%B"$N+ #0 "% S%<%7+#%$($#+I$%1%&!)*0 %O 4.$%X*6T%<HLM88
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;<<81H988 ""!'*%CN40".*+4%B"$N+ #0 "% S%;%7+#%$($#+I%1%P04+%/+N#%_%E4! .$%;=LM88
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;;=81H988 ""!'*%CN40".*+4%B"$N+ #0 "% S%;%7+#%$($#+I%1%A0)4'4(%;=LM88
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC8<:<;:<8;=;8;1;;K81H988 ""!'*%CN40".*+4%B"$N+ #0 "% S%;%7+#%$($#+I:;%2 6%1%,0#(%2'**%<98M88
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC8<:<G:<8;=K881K8;=1HL98 ""!'*%CN40".*+4%B"$N+ #0 "% S%;%7+#:;%64(%$($#+I%1%OE&%9=8M88
C3??BE%,U?& QBFC%<\\L8>M88
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;<L81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%HLM88
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9;81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%9=M8=
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;<L81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%9<M9;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%1%, )4'%L8M;;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9;81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%9=MGG
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9<81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%HKM><
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9K81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%;GMG>
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;L<81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%;9ML8
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;L981H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%>M<;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;L>81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%LM;9
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;>881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%;8MGL
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;K881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%;M<;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;LL81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%H8M<H
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;H<81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%9HMLG
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;;<81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%99M98
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9<81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%HKM=;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;;981H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%<;M98
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;;>81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%;;M<;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;;<81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%9<ML>
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;H981H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%<M8L
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=<;8188881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%KM=8
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K<81K<8;1H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%<MH9
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K<81K<8<1H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%<MH9
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9K81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%;=M;;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;;K81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%9ML;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;<<81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%;GMK<
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;;>81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%;;MGG
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K8;188881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%98M;G
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K88188881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%9=M;H
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K<8188881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%=M=K
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%K>8M9>
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=<;8188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%>M<=
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K88188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%;8=ML<
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K8;188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%;8=ML<
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K<8188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1?'4 -%<8;=%=M88
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;;981H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%<<M8;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%><M9>
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;L<81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%;;M>>
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;L981H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%>M9=
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;L>81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%LM9;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;>881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%9MG<
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;K881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=18MLG
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;LL81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%H8MLG
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;H<81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%9LM=>
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;H981H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%<M;<
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2%\]89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?^&'T+%G% S%;8
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=<;8188881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%GM;L
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K<81K<8;1H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%<ML<
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K<81K<8<1H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%<ML<
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;;K81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%9MLK
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;<<81H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%;GM==
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K8;188881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%98ML>
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K88188881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%9=ML<
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K<8188881H8H8A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%HM<;
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=;8;188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%KKHMGG
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=<;8188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%>MLG
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K88188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%;;HM>=
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K8;188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%;;HM>=
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*8<:<G:<8;=K<8188881<8;;A0S+%B"$!4'" +1P+)4!'4(%<8;=%HMGL
C!"%A0S+%P0"'" 0'*%<\\=GGM<H
E'4T+#8<:;L:<8;=K8;188881H<H8V+'"$%L9M=K
E'4T+#8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;;K81H;<8E4'(%'"6%X4!$-%# % *+'"% '4N+#%;=M9;
E'4T+#8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L981H;98E0$$!+$%HMG<
E'4T+#8<:;L:<8;=K88188881H<H8V+'"$%L9M=K
E'4T+#%;9<M8K
E,B,\\%B" M8<:<G:<8;=K88188881HL98;81 1?PE1;8%<KHML8
E,B,\\%B" M%<KHML8
E ! -& 0"#%A T0 %AA,8<:<G:<8;=<;8188881HK8L, !" 0*%,-'I)+4%/0T0#'*%?+60'% R%3NT4'6+%>8\\8KHM88
E ! -& 0"#%A T0 %AA,%>8\\8KHM88
3AEB? EF%,UQE@UAC%FAF,E@B,%AA,8<:<G:<8;=K881K8;=1HLL8,-'"-'$$+"%FOE&% 04%/0$ -'4T+%&4+$$!4+%E4'"$I0##+4%<\\=L>M88
3AEB? EF%,UQE@UAC%FAF,E@B,%AA,8<:<G:<8;=K8;188881HL98,-'"-'$$+"%A0S#%C#'#0 "%e<>%C70# -%O040"T%>LLM88
3AEB? EF%,UQE@UAC%FAF,E@B,%AA,%9\\>;;M88
3QBEF/%O f8<:<G:<8;=;8;188881<88>&@%X'# -%88H8;M89M<8;=%3"0#+6%O'(%<=MH8
3QBEF/%O f%<=MH8
34)'"%A'"6%B"$#0#!#+8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;H<81H9K8&!)*0 % T+" (%?+I)+4$-0N%L>8M88
34)'"%A'"6%B"$#0#!#+%L>8M88
3C X*!+X .8<:;L:<8;=K881K8H91HLL8C'IN*0"T%Z'*Z+%H<M>>
3C X*!+X .%H<M>>
RFCC,U%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=K881K8;=1HL98FRL8R%4+)!0*6%.0#%;G>M88
RFCC,U%BQ,%;G>M88
OFBCC? Q8<:;L:<8;=;8;1;L9L1H;98, $#!I+$%99>M8;
OFBCC? Q%99>M8;
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9L81H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%9<M;8
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2%\]89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?^&'T+%=% S%;8
!"#!$%&'($$)*+,'!-$./0,/)+( )*+,
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<;:<8;=K88188881H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%L\\L;=M8G
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=K88188881H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%;\\HG9M9G
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=K8;188881H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%L\\K9GM<H
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=K88188881H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%<\\HH>ML>
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9L81H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%;;M9<
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9L81H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%;;M9<
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;>881H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%;<M;>
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;>881H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%;8M;L
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=K88188881H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%>;M8G
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=;8;1;9L81H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%98M;=
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,8<:<G:<8;=K881K8H91H9<8+*+ #40 0#(% -'4T+$%9\\9K8M<K
i,FA%FQF@`f%BQ,%;G\\K<LMGL
\[ 4 8<:;L:<8;=K881K8;=1H;<8@+N'04%D0#%9HMG8
\[ 4 %9HMG8
%;L8\\GG9M<>
!"#$%&'(')*+%1%,-+ .%/+#'0*1 ,2%\]89:8;:<8;=%1%%=5<>% ?^&'T+%;8% S%;8
FEBRUARY 2019 WEBSITE ANALYTICS OVERVIEW
SESSIONS VS. PAGEVIEWS
SessionsPageviews
1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000 3,0003,0003,000
15,932 Sessions vs. 38,702 Pageviews
2,0002,0002,000
Session: The period of time a user is actively
500500500500
engaged with our website, app, etc.
1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000
Pageview: Total # of pages viewed. Repeated
views of a single page are counted.
ÈFeb 3Feb 5Feb 7Feb 9Feb 11Feb 13Feb 15Feb 17Feb 19Feb 21Feb 23Feb 25Feb 27
HOW ARE THEY FINDING US?NEW VS. RETURNING VISITORWHAT CAN WE LEARN?
Chanhassen’s website gains attention from neighboring communities as well as some
7,080 Organic Search 9,523 New Visitors
from around the country. Visitors spend very little time on each page, which hopefully
3,723 Direct 3,291 Returning Visitors
582 Social
315 Referral
WHAT ARE THEY SEARCHING FOR?WHAT PAGES ARE THEY VISITING?
Organic Search
Direct
Social
PagePageviews
Search TermTotal Unique Searches
Referral
38,702
(Other)1,046
31.8%
% of Total:
% of Total:
100.00%
100.00%(38,702)
60.5%
(1,046)
5,411
1./
(13.98%)
15
1.Pickleball
(1.43%)
1,352
2./https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/chanhassenmn
(3.49%)
7
2.Ithilien Pond Maintenance Project
(0.67%)
1,298
3./296/Recreation-Center
(3.35%)
6
3.pickleball
WHERE ARE THEY?
AVG TIME ON PAGE(0.57%)
1,287
4./240/Agendas-Minutes-Videos
(3.33%)
6
1 minute 34 seconds
4.Snow Removal
1,855
1,073
1.Minneapolis
(0.57%)
5./270/February-Festival
(15.72%)
(2.77%)
AVG PAGE LOAD TIME
5
1,468
995
5.map
2.Chanhassen
6./301/Gym-Schedule
(0.48%)
(12.44%)
(2.57%)
3.59 seconds
1,212
5
702
3.Chicago
7./31/Parks-Recreation
6.Rink Attendant Job Description
(10.27%)
(1.81%)
(0.48%)
613
670
HOW OLD ARE THEY?
4.Chaska
5
8./194/Proposed-Developments
(5.20%)7.volunteer
(1.73%)
(0.48%)
557
1,210
588
5.Eden Prairie
1.35-44
9./1467/Galpin-Site---Preliminary-Plat-Rezoning-
5
(4.72%)
(28.70%)
(1.52%)
8.zoning map
(0.48%)
433
985
492
6.Saint Paul
2.25-34
10./vr/modal
(3.67%)
(23.36%)
(1.27%)
4
9.Babysitting 101
(0.38%)
312
918
7.Minnetonka
3.45-54
(2.64%)
(21.77%)
4
10.Basketball
(0.38%)
236
583
8.Waconia
4.55-64
(2.00%)
(13.83%)
224
314
9.Seattle
5.65+
(1.90%)
(7.45%)
193
206
10.Bloomington
6.18-24
(1.64%)
(4.89%)