The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda and PacketAGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION Note: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. 1.Update on the Feasibility Study for the Newly Acquired Parkland at Lake Ann Park 2.Key Financial Strategy: Pavement Management Followup Discussion Q & A B.CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. (PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS 1.Proclamation Chanhassen Red Birds 2019 State Amateur Baseball Class "B" Champions D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approve City Council Minutes dated August 26, 2019 2.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated July 16, 2019 3.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated August 20, 2019 4.Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for CSAH 101 Project 5.Approve Quote for Stormwater Improvements in Carver Beach Neighborhood 6.Resolution 2019XX: Approve Quotes for Lift Station 22 Rehabilitation 7.Glendale Drive Homes: Approve Amended Development Contract 8.Adopt Amended Economic Development Commission Bylaws 9.Resolution No. 2019XX: Accept Advertisement for Bids; Award Contract for the Bluff Creek Trail Rehabilitation Project AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2019CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:30 P.M. WORK SESSIONNote: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Update on the Feasibility Study for the Newly Acquired Parkland at Lake Ann Park2.Key Financial Strategy: Pavement Management Followup Discussion Q & AB.CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. (PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS1.Proclamation Chanhassen Red Birds 2019 State Amateur Baseball Class "B"ChampionsD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated August 26, 20192.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated July 16, 20193.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated August 20, 20194.Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for CSAH 101 Project5.Approve Quote for Stormwater Improvements in Carver Beach Neighborhood6.Resolution 2019XX: Approve Quotes for Lift Station 22 Rehabilitation7.Glendale Drive Homes: Approve Amended Development Contract8.Adopt Amended Economic Development Commission Bylaws 9.Resolution No. 2019XX: Accept Advertisement for Bids; Award Contract for the Bluff Creek Trail Rehabilitation Project 10.Consider a Site Plan Review with Variance for Chanhassen Butcher for Property Located at 590 West 79th Street E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda) 1.Eastern Carver County School District 112 Referendum DeeDee Kahring, Director of Finance and Operations F.OLD BUSINESS G.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.Approval of OnSale Intoxicating Liquor License with Sunday Sales for Chanhassen Butcher, LLC dba Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street H.NEW BUSINESS I.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS J.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS K.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.Review of Claims Paid 09092019 2.Building Permit Data as of 09062019 L.ADJOURNMENT M.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2019CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:30 P.M. WORK SESSIONNote: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Update on the Feasibility Study for the Newly Acquired Parkland at Lake Ann Park2.Key Financial Strategy: Pavement Management Followup Discussion Q & AB.CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. (PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS1.Proclamation Chanhassen Red Birds 2019 State Amateur Baseball Class "B"ChampionsD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated August 26, 20192.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated July 16, 20193.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated August 20, 20194.Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for CSAH 101 Project5.Approve Quote for Stormwater Improvements in Carver Beach Neighborhood6.Resolution 2019XX: Approve Quotes for Lift Station 22 Rehabilitation7.Glendale Drive Homes: Approve Amended Development Contract8.Adopt Amended Economic Development Commission Bylaws9.Resolution No. 2019XX: Accept Advertisement for Bids; Award Contract for the BluffCreek Trail Rehabilitation Project10.Consider a Site Plan Review with Variance for Chanhassen Butcher for PropertyLocated at 590 West 79th StreetE.VISITOR PRESENTATIONSVisitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete andsubmit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda)1.Eastern Carver County School District 112 Referendum DeeDee Kahring, Directorof Finance and OperationsF.OLD BUSINESSG.PUBLIC HEARINGS1.Approval of OnSale Intoxicating Liquor License with Sunday Sales for ChanhassenButcher, LLC dba Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th StreetH.NEW BUSINESSI.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONSJ.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONSK.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION1.Review of Claims Paid 090920192.Building Permit Data as of 09062019L.ADJOURNMENTM.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONSWelcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen CityCouncil wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is providedat every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required tocomplete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available athttps://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior tothe meeting.Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. Whencalled upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the CityCouncil as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the CityCouncil.If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokespersonthat can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If youhave written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Houlihan's, 530 Pond Promenade in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Update on the Feasibility Study for the Newly Acquired Parkland at Lake Ann Park Section 5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.1. Prepared By Todd Hoffman, Parks & Recreation Director File No: BACKGROUND The city is working with HKGi to prepare a feasibility report for improvements of the newly acquired parkland at Lake Ann. This includes analysis of natural resources on site, proposed trail layouts and materials, water and wetland crossings, and interfacing with trails within the new housing development and existing park facilities. This report will help the city understand the impacts and opportunities of parkland improvements with regards to cost, constructability, regulatory considerations, and natural resources. The Study Process to Date A trail connection around Lake Ann has been a part of the city’s plans for many years. Subdivision and development of the Galpin Boulevard site provided the opportunity for the city to preserve approximately 100 acres of property and over a mile of shoreline along Lake Ann and Lake Lucy. This land was preserved with the intent to: Continue trails around Lake Ann to allow for an eventual loop Preserve the land as a valued natural area in Chanhassen Connect residents with nature, trails, and parks Protect the ecological functioning (habitat, water quality) of the site Celebrate Lake Ann, Lake Lucy, and this property as community amenities The city and HKGi are exploring different approaches to meeting these goals. Public outreach through online and in person surveys have reached over 500 people, who have provided feedback on what they would like to see and do on the new parkland. This input will be considered, along with technical considerations (constructability, cost, regulations), and input from elected and appointed representatives. In addition to the survey, the project team participated in a Joint Commissions tour stop at Greenwood Shores Park, adjacent to the new property, on August 7 and presented a project update followed by discussion with the Park and Recreation Commission on August 27. Next Steps During the month of September, the city and HKGi will use this information to develop a preferred concept for further development of the feasibility report, including costs, phasing, and permitting. Submittal and presentation of the report CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 9, 2019SubjectUpdate on the Feasibility Study for the Newly Acquired Parkland at Lake Ann ParkSection5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.1.Prepared By Todd Hoffman, Parks & RecreationDirector File No: BACKGROUNDThe city is working with HKGi to prepare a feasibility report for improvements of the newly acquired parkland atLake Ann. This includes analysis of natural resources on site, proposed trail layouts and materials, water and wetlandcrossings, and interfacing with trails within the new housing development and existing park facilities. This report willhelp the city understand the impacts and opportunities of parkland improvements with regards to cost, constructability,regulatory considerations, and natural resources.The Study Process to DateA trail connection around Lake Ann has been a part of the city’s plans for many years. Subdivision and developmentof the Galpin Boulevard site provided the opportunity for the city to preserve approximately 100 acres of propertyand over a mile of shoreline along Lake Ann and Lake Lucy. This land was preserved with the intent to:Continue trails around Lake Ann to allow for an eventual loopPreserve the land as a valued natural area in ChanhassenConnect residents with nature, trails, and parksProtect the ecological functioning (habitat, water quality) of the siteCelebrate Lake Ann, Lake Lucy, and this property as community amenitiesThe city and HKGi are exploring different approaches to meeting these goals. Public outreach through online and inperson surveys have reached over 500 people, who have provided feedback on what they would like to see and doon the new parkland. This input will be considered, along with technical considerations (constructability, cost,regulations), and input from elected and appointed representatives.In addition to the survey, the project team participated in a Joint Commissions tour stop at Greenwood Shores Park,adjacent to the new property, on August 7 and presented a project update followed by discussion with the Park andRecreation Commission on August 27.Next Steps During the month of September, the city and HKGi will use this information to develop a preferred concept for further development of the feasibility report, including costs, phasing, and permitting. Submittal and presentation of the report to the City Council is anticipated in October. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Lake Ann Board 2. Lake Ann Handout 3. Lake Ann Feasibility Study Project Plan 4. Lake Ann Park Expansion Project Public Survey Results LAKE ANN FEASIBILITY STUDY CONCEPT DIAGRAMS CONCEPT VARIATIONS BOTH CONCEPTS MEET THE KEY PRINCIPLES OUTLINED BUT VARY ON WHAT THEY PRIORITIZE. HELP US UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE AND DO IN THIS PARKLAND! EMPHASIS ON PRESERVATION: THIS CONCEPT FOCUSES ON PROVIDING LARGER UN-ACCESSED AREAS OF LAND, A LIMITED TRAIL NETWORK, REDUCED WINTER USE, INVASIVE SPECIES REMOVAL PRECEDENT PHOTOS ARE EXAMPLES TO HELP ILLUSTRATE WHAT THE SITE MIGHT LOOK AND FEEL LIKE. THEY ARE NOT FINAL DESIGNS. PRECEDENT PHOTOS ARE EXAMPLES TO HELP ILLUSTRATE WHAT THE SITE MIGHT LOOK AND FEEL LIKE. THEY ARE NOT FINAL DESIGNS. EMPHASIS ON USER EXPERIENCE: THIS CONCEPT FOCUSES ON PROVIDING ACCESS TO RESIDENTS AND VISITORS, CONNECTING PEOPLE WITH NATURE, VARIED TRAIL EXPERIENCES, EDUCATION, INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT KEY PRINCIPLES: • CONTINUE TRAILS AROUND LAKE ANN TO ALLOW FOR AN EVENTUAL LOOP • PRESERVE THE LAND AS A VALUED NATURAL AREA IN CHANHASSEN • CONNECT RESIDENTS WITH NATURE, TRAILS, AND PARKS • PROTECT THE ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING (HABITAT, WATER QUALITY) OF THE SITE • CELEBRATE LAKE ANN, LAKE LUCY, AND THIS PROPERTY AS COMMUNITY AMENITIES KEY QUESTIONS: • TRAIL SURFACE(S) • BRIDGE/BOARDWALK CONNECTIONS • NUMBER OF TRAILS AND WHERE THEY GO • WINTER USAGE • APPROACH TO NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRESERVES A NON-ACCESSED AREA ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE (~35 ACRES OF WETLAND/UPLAND) LIMITED TRAILS THROUGHOUT THE SITE ONE MAIN TRAIL CORRIDOR WITH AGGREGATE SURFACE MINIMAL AMENITIES ON THE SITE HIGH INVESTMENT IN NATURAL RESOURCES PROTECTION AND RESTORATION LIMITED WINTER USE PAVED TRAIL TO BE BUILT IN THE FUTURE AROUND THE ENTIRE LAKE ANN PERIMETER PRESERVES A NON- ACCESSED AREA ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE (~22 ACRES OF WETLAND) ONE MAIN PAVED TRAIL CORRIDOR CONNECTS GREENWOOD SHORES TO NORTHERN AND WESTERN ACCESS POINTS ONE SECONDARY SOFT SURFACE HIKING TRAIL THROUGH THE MAPLE BASSWOOD FOREST AMENITIES INCLUDE FISHING PIERS, OVERLOOKS, AND BENCHES ALONG THE TRAILS BALANCED INVESTMENT IN NATURAL RESOURCES PROTECTION AND RESTORATION, FOCUSED ON BUCKTHORN MITIGATION MAIN PAVED TRAIL MAY BE CLEARED IN WINTER FOR WALKING AND BIKING PAVED TRAIL TO BE CONTINUED TO THE SOUTH IN THE FUTURE AROUND THE ENTIRE LAKE ANN PERIMETER Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Proposed Lake Ann Park Expansion and Trail Loop Concept Plan Lake Ann Park w 78th st / cr 16 park expansion boundarycr 117p ow e r s b l v d arboretum blvd lake ann lake lucy Continue Trail Loop around Lake Ann Make trail connection to neighborhoods (Route TBD) Make trail connection to neighborhoods (Route TBD) Connect to existing trail Continue Trail Loop around Lake Ann Legend Existing Trail Existing Sidewalk Proposed Bituminous Trail Future Bituminous Trail Bridge Boardwalk Park Road Future Park Expansion Wetland 500 0 500 Feet Access Point Shared-Use Aggregate Trail Shared-Use Paved Trail Boardwalk/Bridge Development Node/ Overlook Wetland Forest LEGEND Overlook Overlook + Fishing Bench OOOverlook OOOvvveerrllooookkkk +++++ FFFFFFFFiiiiiishing BBBBBBeeeeeennnnnnccccchhhhhhhBBBBeeeennnncccchhhh O Access Point Natural Surface Hiking Trail Shared-Use Paved Trail Boardwalk/Bridge Development Node/ Overlook Wetland Forest LEGEND LAKE ANN PRESERVE & TRAILS FEASIBILITY STUDY THE CITY IS IN THE PROCESS OF UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES, CONSTRUCTABILITY AND COSTS WILL BE TO BUILD THE TRAILS AND PRESERVE IN THE NEW PARKLAND AT LAKE ANN IF YOU HAVE THOUGHTS ABOUT WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE AND DO ON THIS PROPERTY, WE’D LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU! Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Proposed Lake Ann Park Expansion and Trail Loop Concept Plan Lake Ann Park w 78th st / cr 16 park expansion boundarycr 117p o w e r s b l v d arboretum blvd lake ann lake lucy Continue Trail Loop around Lake Ann Make trail connection to neighborhoods (Route TBD) Make trail connection to neighborhoods (Route TBD) Connect to existing trail Continue Trail Loop around Lake Ann Legend Existing Trail Existing Sidewalk Proposed Bituminous Trail Future Bituminous Trail Bridge Boardwalk Park Road Future Park Expansion Wetland 500 0 500 Feet FEASIBILITY STUDY THE CITY IS IN THE PROCESS OF UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES, CONSTRUCTABILITY AND COSTS WILL BE TO BUILD THE TRAILS AND PRESERVE IN THE NEW PARKLAND AT LAKE ANN IF YOU HAVE THOUGHTS ABOUT WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE AND DO ON THIS PROPERTY, WE’D LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU! IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: TODD HOFFMAN, PARK AND RECREATION DIRECTOR THOFFMAN@CI.CHANHASSEN.MN.US 952-227-1129 KEY PRINCIPLES: • CONTINUE TRAILS AROUND LAKE ANN TO ALLOW FOR AN EVENTUAL LOOP • PRESERVE THE LAND AS A VALUED NATURAL AREA IN CHANHASSEN • CONNECT RESIDENTS WITH NATURE, TRAILS, AND PARKS • PROTECT THE ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING (HABITAT, WATER QUALITY) OF THE SITE • CELEBRATE LAKE ANN, LAKE LUCY, AND THIS PROPERTY AS COMMUNITY AMENITIES KEY QUESTIONS: • TRAIL SURFACE(S) • BRIDGE/BOARDWALK CONNECTIONS • NUMBER OF TRAILS AND WHERE THEY GO • WINTER USAGE • APPROACH TO NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT THESE TWO CONCEPTS WERE DEVELOPED TO MEET THE KEY PRINCIPLES BUT VARY ON WHAT THEY PRIORITIZE IN ORDER TO HELP US UNDERSTAND WHAT PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO SEE ON THIS PROPERTY. PARTS OF BOTH CONCEPTS MAY MAKE IT INTO THE FINAL PROJECT. TELL US WHAT YOU LIKE AND DON’T LIKE! LIMIT HUMAN SPACES TO ONE TRAIL CORRIDOR CRUSHED STONE TRAILS INFORMAL NATURE OBSERVATION LARGE BUFFERS TO/FROM LAKES & WETLANDS AGGRESSIVE BUCKTHORN REMOVAL WAIT TO PAVE UNTIL ENTIRE LOOP IS POSSIBLE UNCLEARED TRAILS IN WINTER OTHER COMMENTS/IDEAS/CONCERNS? VARIED TRAIL EXPERIENCES AND LOCATIONS PAVED TRAILS LAKE EXPERIENCES (FISHING & OVERLOOKS) BENCHES/PLACES TO SIT AND REST PRESERVE SENSITIVE HABITAT BUCKTHORN/INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT CLEAR PAVED TRAILS IN WINTER, LEAVE NATURAL SURFACE TRAILS LIKE DISLIKE LIKE DISLIKEINPUT DIRECTIONS: 1. SELECT WHICH PARTS OF THE CONCEPTS YOU LIKE AND DISLIKE 2. CIRCLE THE 33 STATEMENTS THAT YOU THINK ARE MOST IMPORTANT 3. PROVIDE OTHER COMMENTS, IDEAS, AND CONCERNS THANKS!SURVEY ALSO AVAILABLE ONLINE ATWWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/R/CHANLAKEANN Task Task Description July 8-12 July 15-19 July 22-26 July 29-2 Aug 5-9 Aug 12-16 Aug 19-23 Aug 26-30 Sept 2-6 Sept 9-13 Sept 16-20Sept 23-27 Sept 30-4 Oct 7-131 Project Background and Analysis1.1 Project Startup1.2 Previous Plan Review1.3 Key Resources Mapping1.4 Site Tour Staff2 Master Plan Alternatives2.1 Conceptual Alignment of Trails and Boardwalks2.2 Preliminary analysis of wetland and floodplain impacts3 Stakeholder Input3.1 Pop Up Events 3.2 Staff Commissions, Council Work Session Joint3.3 Social Pinpoint Tool3.4 Work Sessions with StaffStaff Staff Staff4 Preferred Master Plan and Related Feasibilty Report4.1 Alignment of Trails and Boardwalks and Bridges4.2 Update 3D Visualizations4.3 Updated wetland and floodplain analysis4.4 Cost Analysis of Preferred Plan4.5 Permitting Analysis and Related Submittal and Approval Timing4.6 Proposed Implementation Strategies and Phasing5 Finalize the Report and Seek Approvals5.1 Park and Recreation Commission MeetingPRC5.3 City Council MeetingCCCity Council 8-Jul 22-Jul 12-Aug 26-Aug 9-Sep 23-Sep 7-OctPark and Recreation Commission 23-Jul 27-Aug 24-Sep Q1 This concept includes a number of different approaches to creating the park. Some of them may appeal to you while others do not. Tell us what you like and don't like about this concept: Answered: 516 Skipped: 7 59.12% 295 40.88% 204 499 Like Dislike Limit human spaces to on... Crushed stone trails informal nature... Large buffers to/from lake... Aggressive buckthorn... Wait to pave until entire... Uncleared trails in... 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% LIKE DISLIKE TOTAL Limit human spaces to one trail corridor 1 / 14 Lake Ann Input 63.10% 318 36.90% 186 504 92.06% 464 7.94% 40 504 64.97% 319 35.03% 172 491 91.27% 460 8.73% 44 504 62.10% 308 37.90% 188 496 40.16% 200 59.84% 298 498 Crushed stone trails informal nature observation Large buffers to/from lakes & Wetlands Aggressive buckthorn removal Wait to pave until entire loop is possible Uncleared trails in winter 2 / 14 Lake Ann Input Q2 This concept includes a number of different approaches to creating the park. Some of them may appeal to you while others do not. Tell us what you like and don't like about this concept: Answered: 519 Skipped: 4 84.40% 422 15.60% 78 500 Like Dislike Varied Trail Experiences ... Paved Trails Lake Experiences... Benches/Places to sit and rest Preserve sensitive... Buckthorn/Invas ive Species... Clear paved trails in... 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% LIKE DISLIKE TOTAL Varied Trail Experiences and locations 3 / 14 Lake Ann Input 64.89% 329 35.11% 178 507 81.03% 410 18.97% 96 506 88.43% 451 11.57% 59 510 97.87% 505 2.13% 11 516 95.04% 479 4.96% 25 504 75.70% 380 24.30% 122 502 Paved Trails Lake Experiences (Fishing & overlooks) Benches/Places to sit and rest Preserve sensitive habitat Buckthorn/Invasive Species Management Clear paved trails in winter, Leave Natural Surface trails 4 / 14 Lake Ann Input 46.18%236 36.59%187 35.42%181 27.40%140 Q3 When examining the concepts, what are the three (3) most important things you would like to see?(Choose up to 3) Answered: 511 Skipped: 12 Preserve sensitive... Lake experiences... Varied trail experiences ... Paved trails Benches/Places to sit and rest Clear paved trails in... Limit human spaces to on... Aggressive buckthorn... Large buffers to/from lake... Buckthorn/Invas ive Species... Crushed stone trails Informal nature... Wait to pave until entire... Uncleared trails in... 0%10%20%30%40%50% 46.18% 46.18% 46.18% 46.18% 46.18% 46.18% 46.18% 36.59% 36.59% 36.59% 36.59% 36.59% 36.59% 36.59% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 27.40% 27.40% 27.40% 27.40% 27.40% 27.40% 27.40% 25.24% 25.24% 25.24% 25.24% 25.24% 25.24% 25.24% 23.29% 23.29% 23.29% 23.29% 23.29% 23.29% 23.29% 21.53% 21.53% 21.53% 21.53% 21.53% 21.53% 21.53% 18.79% 18.79% 18.79% 18.79% 18.79% 18.79% 18.79% 17.42% 17.42% 17.42% 17.42% 17.42% 17.42% 17.42% 15.26% 15.26% 15.26% 15.26% 15.26% 15.26% 15.26% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 14.87% 6.65% 6.65% 6.65% 6.65% 6.65% 6.65% 6.65% 6.07% 6.07% 6.07% 6.07% 6.07% 6.07% 6.07% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Preserve sensitive habitat Lake experiences (fishing & overlooks) Varied trail experiences and locations Paved trails 5 / 14 Lake Ann Input 25.24%129 23.29%119 21.53%110 18.79%96 17.42%89 15.26%78 14.87%76 14.87%76 6.65%34 6.07%31 Total Respondents: 511 Benches/Places to sit and rest Clear paved trails in winter, leave natural surface trails Limit human spaces to one trail corridor Aggressive buckthorn removal Large buffers to/from lakes & wetlands Buckthorn/Invasive Species Management Crushed stone trails Informal nature observation Wait to pave until entire loop is possible Uncleared trails in winter 6 / 14 Lake Ann Input Q4 Do you have other comments, ideas, or concerns with regards to the park? Answered: 153 Skipped: 370 #RESPONSES DATE 1 I like the emphasis on user experience as long as there is oversight on the part of the city to ensure habitats are preserved and litter is disposed of throughout the new park. 8/31/2019 12:14 PM 2 We all know this is some of the most valuable land and habitat in Chanhassen. We want it to get the jewel of our park system to enjoy while retaining wildlife respectfully. It also would be appropriate to build some sort of monument to Prince and his legacy. 8/31/2019 9:05 AM 3 Our city park system, as with the act establishing Yellowstone National Park, should be for the benefit and enjoyment of the people. Pave the trails for all users, provide multiple experiences for people of all ages, aggressively remove invasive species (buckthorne). An emphasis on user experiences will be consistent with long-term plans, our existing park system, and proportionate with cost and effort involved with obtaining this property. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. 8/31/2019 8:11 AM 4 Keep ALL trails unpaved now and into the future. Plow unpaved trails when 4" or more of snow so it's accessible year around. Put in a "Camel Hump" bridge (4' of clearance from high water mark to bottom of bridge) in at the creek connecting Ann and Lucy so that canoes and small fishing boats can more easily use both lakes for fishing, paddling, etc. (but don't want big speed boats going to Ann). Over all - keep the area "wild" as possible, meaning no big areas of mowed grass, etc. Also do some Native Prairie Flower plots where appropriate for the Bees and Butterflies and the other wildlife that'd benefit too. 8/31/2019 6:09 AM 5 The east side of Lake Ann/Lake Lucy are already "Emphasis on User Experience". It would be great if the new west-park focused on "Emphasis on Preservation". This approach would satisfy both camps of park users. However, first and foremost we must preserve sensitive habitat. 8/30/2019 4:39 AM 6 Put in another 1-2 big fishing docks.8/30/2019 4:39 AM 7 I like the bridge idea on the little river connecting Lucy and Ann. I hope the bridge is high enough that canoes and kayaks can pass via water under bridge. Watercraft can get thru now went water is high and when local residence don’t build up barriers, such as logs and branches to prevent watercraft access to Lucy. That has been an ongoing issue, which would hopefully be addressed, or prevented with bridge. Thank you for preserving this land for people, animals and the environment. This area is one of the best places in the TC, and a true gem. 8/30/2019 3:14 AM 8 I would expect that a project of this nature which is funded by tax dollars MUST be accessible to ALL people. Those folks with limited mobility deserve access to this park as much as any other able-bodied person. Have ADA requirements been considered in either proposal? It should be! 8/29/2019 7:38 PM 9 Chanhassen already has a high volume of paved lakes trails. A more natural environment with crushed lime trails or even single track hiking/biking is not available and in high demand. Plowing trails in winter is not necessary as there are already many options. A snowshoe or natural environment is only available at the arboretuem or the mammoth trails which are on private property but heavily used. 8/29/2019 5:03 PM 10 Make it happen!8/29/2019 5:03 PM 11 Thank you for doing this survey!8/29/2019 11:11 AM 12 What about parking near path? Need/want access for all.8/29/2019 8:29 AM 7 / 14 Lake Ann Input 13 Todd, thank you for asking for our feedback. We would love to see more walking and bike trails. It promotes healthy outdoor family activity and provides true quality of life. I feel like their are so many great bike trails in the surrounding areas yet we can’t safely access any of them. We are essentially locked in by highway 7, can’t get to Excelsior....and can’t go further west (Waconia) due to Lake Minnewashta. I guess there might be routes for experienced bike riders but not families with young children. Research show that communities that provide walkability (or bike-ability) are in high demand. If Chanhassen is trying to create a vibrant downtown, projects like this would help! 8/29/2019 4:58 AM 14 Would like to see the trails connect to the small path currently off of Lucy Ridge Lane near Lake Lucy Road. Would allow many more residents to enter this trail system easily and safely. 8/29/2019 2:33 AM 15 I am thrilled that the city gained this new park space. Thank you! Keeping the land as natural as possible while still allowing access for outdoor enthusiasts is something I would like to see happen. Thank you. 8/29/2019 1:39 AM 16 We want to see Lake ann same as lake calhoon.8/28/2019 7:40 PM 17 Concerns with added traffic and trash management. Need to consider proper waste, including pet waste, management. Study should be included regarding additional traffic around a lake and it’s impact to the lake. 8/28/2019 2:20 PM 18 Some things go without saying like preserving sensitive habitat. Right? And managing buckthorn and invasive species. To me, the biggest question is whether or not to pave the trails. I say yes in order to allow access to those whose needs so often get overlooked, not to mention parents with strollers. I just don’t think trying to be exclusive or protective in the sense of trying to keep this a secret or exclude certain groups of people is the right way to go as a statement for a city to make. 8/28/2019 11:55 AM 19 The unspoiled, undeveloped land is a rare treasure. We do not need to jump into developing this space immediately, nor disrupt more of the animal habitat at the same time as the new neighborhood. If it is found that more permanent aspects are needed they can be added at a later time as the need arises. 8/28/2019 11:19 AM 20 A huge awesome crazy park for the kids!!! The park of all parks! Pavilions. Areas of attraction and activity. 8/28/2019 9:43 AM 21 The least amount of human disruption to the area as possible. Leave it as it is. Enough wildlife disruption is already happening in the area. No other lake access is necessary. Invasive plants need to be dealt with while conservation of natives is critical. There are enough bike trails so I hope this does not become another one. 8/28/2019 9:38 AM 22 Year round paved trail loop that can be accessed by stroller would be ideal. I strongly prefer the user experience option. Also, stop blocking access to the parking lot from Greenwood Shores. - 8/28/2019 8:56 AM 23 I love the idea of a trail all the way around lake. Keep natural if possible. Less upkeep/maintenance if keep trail unpaved? Love these ideas and look forward to biking and walking the trails. I live in Longacres neighborhood. 8/28/2019 5:52 AM 24 Chanhassen has a lot of playgrounds. I would love to see in nature play area (I.e. Lean-tos made with sticks, logs on ground for balancing or sitting, rocks for climbing, stumps for climbing, monkey fist swing, etc). Children and adults don’t interact physically with the environment enough in this high-tech world and that would create an encouraging place to do so. Ideas could be gleaned from Lowry Nature Center, Richardson Nature Center, and Westmoreland Nature Play Area (Oregon), as well as searching “woodland play” on Pinterest. I would love to see no plastic in this area (how about large landscape rocks or benches made from tree stumps?) other than recycle and waste bins. Please go out of your way to preserve any mature trees during this process! Thank you! 8/28/2019 1:58 AM 25 First item to accomplish is to build a bridge across waterway that connects Ann and Lucy to access park 8/28/2019 1:48 AM 26 Build a bridge now.8/28/2019 1:12 AM 8 / 14 Lake Ann Input 27 I think creating a small area dedicated to a natural playground would be a wonderful area here in the forested space. With so much acreage it would be easy to do and it would encourage use of the space but not off-trailed space. I would encourage the trails to not be paved so there is better water management, as well as not plowed in winter so there is a good space for snowshoeing!! Save your resources! Please do not spray these areas. The city has gotten extremely close to spraying the natural area off Kerber (basically into the steps). There is absolutely no reason anyone needs a "weed"-free area up to that natural preserve, as most of it is the side of a road, but also the areas kids roll around and enjoy, as well as animals. The pesticides run directly downhill into the water sources you are trying to preserve as well. We need to save our natural resources, as you are doing here! As well as save the financial resources of the city by not spending them on a frivolous expense. Thank you for what you are doing!! 8/27/2019 5:31 PM 28 Highly desire a BRIDGE over the small channel connection between Lake Ann and Lake Lucy HIGH ENOUGH such that kayaks and canoes will be able to pass under and between the lakes. This channel should be kept clear to allow kayak and canoe access to both lakes. If the bridge is not high enough then boaters might try to "portage" their boats around a low bridge and thereby destroy habitat. Design and build a bridge for free passage below. 8/27/2019 3:33 PM 29 Avoid concrete and any structure in the park space. Create a sense for moving through the area, allowing for bikes and pedestrians 8/27/2019 12:15 PM 30 Would like to see the entire loop around Lake Ann ASAP. I like the current hiking trails on the west through north side of Lake Ann. 8/27/2019 11:13 AM 31 Allow access for small watercraft i.e. canoes, kayaks, to pass between the lakes.8/27/2019 8:59 AM 32 Consider additional users of Greenwood Shores Beach 8/27/2019 5:58 AM 33 Pave trail on main loop around the lake 1-2 more fishing piers Benches not necessary 8/27/2019 5:55 AM 34 Any bridge over the channel between Lakes Ann & Lucy needs to be high enough to provide clearance for kayaks/canoes. 8/27/2019 4:11 AM 35 Minimally invasive. No loop around Ann. Trails far from lake. Don’t want to see people on the trails when on lake. Want lake to remain peaceful. Keep lake clean. 8/26/2019 3:45 PM 36 I would like a Trail under Galpin Rd to allow ease of Longacres residents to access Lake Ann.8/26/2019 12:37 PM 37 Preserve as much peace & nature as possible.8/26/2019 10:02 AM 38 Really enjoy round lake in EP with excercise areas, running. , water features, would love a small amphitheater 8/26/2019 7:22 AM 39 Please preserve the natural beauty and don’t overdevelop.8/26/2019 6:43 AM 40 Please limit concrete/pavement/asphalt to as little as necessary. Please leave as much untouched as possible. Please limit human intrusion to the smallest amount as possible. 8/26/2019 5:57 AM 41 Make it open to walk leashed dogs 8/26/2019 4:57 AM 42 Enable canoe/kayak passage between lakes.8/26/2019 3:55 AM 43 Would really like to see a complete loop around lake ann.8/24/2019 11:58 PM 44 Create passage under galpin to connect to trail head by the guard shack.8/24/2019 3:27 PM 45 Being able to bike, walk and possibly cross coutry ski around the lake is ideal.8/24/2019 1:28 PM 46 Add a parking area at Greenwood Shores beach/picnic area.8/24/2019 8:32 AM 47 I would like to be able to kayak between lake Ann and Lake Lucy. But you don’t have the little gap on the map where you can kayak through. 8/24/2019 3:24 AM 48 Make any bridge across the channel between Lake Lucy and Lake Ann high enough that kayaks can flow under. 8/24/2019 3:04 AM 49 I feel that we have many parks with an emphasis on user experience. It would be nice to have another variety with less pavement and more protection of the natural resources and informal nature observation. 8/23/2019 3:55 PM 50 It would be really nice to have a paved loop trail around Lake Ann and have it connected to Lake Susan/Rice Marsh Lake trail system 8/23/2019 2:19 PM 9 / 14 Lake Ann Input 51 There are so many dogs that walk the area. Put some dog bag stations out for people who don’t pick up or forget a bag. Have a few areas where people can fish or sit on a bench and enjoy the lake. 8/23/2019 10:41 AM 52 Could a disc golf course be added? If not, how about a basket or two for practicing putts?8/23/2019 8:39 AM 53 Thank you!8/23/2019 2:42 AM 54 Keep up the good work. Thrilled the Prince property is finally a reality for a trail completely around Lake Ann. 8/23/2019 2:17 AM 55 I like the idea of having paved trails both for walking and biking. Eventually I would like to see the trail go all the way around Lake Ann 8/22/2019 5:13 PM 56 On most of the current path around Lake Ann you can't see the lake, just woods. The point of walking around a lake is to see the lake, otherwise you'd just go walk in the woods somewhere else. That can still be done in a way that preserves nature. Instead of paving (upkeep!) or crushed rock (easy to twist your ankle) I would suggest wood chips as are found in the new park trails at Fox Woods Preserve. 8/22/2019 3:20 PM 57 Take on aggressive boat monitoring like Henn. C. Did at lake Riley. Aggressively post no dogs in the lakes and explain the threat of polluting the lakes when dogs are peeing in them. Provide plenty of water fountains for human and dogs. Aggressively post dog laws. (I am a dog owner and never allow them in lakes)thanks! 8/22/2019 11:50 AM 58 This survey was very well put together. Thank you.8/22/2019 6:52 AM 59 Love the idea of having a full circle paved path around Lake Ann so all residents can enjoy the lake year-round. 8/22/2019 5:18 AM 60 Connect the trail the older development to the south along Majestic Way so those neighborhoods have access. Increased traffic on Galpin will definitely affect the safety of going to Sugar Bush Park. 8/22/2019 4:07 AM 61 Please leave the space as natural as possible. We have the opportunity to preserve and enjoy the land without turning it into every other paved trail in the city’s network. Less is more. 8/22/2019 3:38 AM 62 Leave in its natural state as much as possible.8/22/2019 3:24 AM 63 Please keep focus on quiet recreation... hiking, biking, snowshoes, kayaks. We have plenty of kid rec opportunities in the city, lets use this space for nature lovers to enjoy in both winter and summer. Please keep the kayak channel accessible between the lakes. 8/21/2019 3:48 PM 64 sorry, I had to pick four !! ------this is just fabulous, keep it going --we have been waiting for years for this to happen especially a whole loop trail around one of our lovely lakes in Chan. !! Hope the trail has lake views all around. Thanks for all your hard work, so much appreciated !! 8/21/2019 1:10 PM 65 Love the idea of the continuous loop and accessibility from multiple entry points. Thank you!8/21/2019 8:45 AM 66 Thank you for asking for input. I just dont like paved trails. I like the crushed gravel or bark for trail running. So glad you bargained for this space. 8/21/2019 8:13 AM 67 Feel very strongly that an archery range should be included in the plan to replace the lost range at Lake Susan. 8/21/2019 6:45 AM 68 It would be cool to have it be a groomed cross-country ski path in the winter 8/21/2019 6:02 AM 69 Outdoor amphitheater for concerts like they have at the Minnesota Zoo would be awesome!!! Dedicate it to Prince and celebrate his legacy! 8/21/2019 5:56 AM 70 Informational kiosks should also be incorporated in the design.8/21/2019 5:11 AM 71 a 3/2 beer joint or restaurant on Lake Minnewashta - Thank YOu 8/21/2019 5:11 AM 72 Whatever the end result, this will be great for the residents of Chanhassen!8/21/2019 3:39 AM 73 The arboretum is a great model in my mind. I don't know how it applies here, likely #2. Survey design - there were things I was indifferent too and forced to choose like / dislike skewing results. (eg I don't care about benches but I don't dislike so I chose like). 8/21/2019 3:02 AM 74 I love the idea of a continuous walking path around Lake Ann and think it will become a destination. 8/21/2019 2:23 AM 75 Keep up the great work 8/21/2019 1:49 AM 10 / 14 Lake Ann Input 76 I like the idea of the picture of cement blocks to cross the stream, low maintenance compared to a wood bridge. An unplowed crushed stone main trail around the lake is fine. The complete loop may not be completed for decades. Plowing the east side gives winter people a way to walk from Greenwood Shores to 78th Street. 8/21/2019 1:40 AM 77 Sorry, This was one of the poorer surveys I have taken. Too much only this or that. It does not request input but more like confirmation of one or the other concept. Appears that gravel with future paving is what is wanted to be the answer. I want cross country skiing somewhere in Chanhassen. So and option for grommed trails in the winter. Paved and gravel are both poor for skiing. Paved is the only surface good for wheelchairs as the citizens ages some of the less mobile people really like to get out. I would like to see the main trails further back from the lake and then secondary trails up to the lake for viewing somewhere between the two plans. Then the last question. Pick only three items. I would rather rate each item. Unimportant, little important, important, very important. I could check almost all of them. 8/20/2019 5:33 PM 78 Stop the housing development, and keep the nature safe.8/20/2019 4:59 PM 79 In regards to the trails, would uncleared trails allow for cross country skiing and snowshoeing? If yes, that would be a top priority for me! 8/20/2019 4:48 PM 80 Create access trails from a number of different places 8/20/2019 3:53 PM 81 How about wildflower installations along shorelines, bluebird housing areas, American lotus lily locations, waterlily installations, blue heron/ egret rookeries, picnic areas, volleyball areas, recreation spaces, rain gardens, etc. Take time to think this through & invite community volunteers to start imagining something unique to Carver County. Remember the butterflies need food: milkweed, and maybe plants to attract hummingbirds. There should be a complete plan before any construction begins. 8/20/2019 3:40 PM 82 Leave primarily natural.8/20/2019 3:20 PM 83 Would like to see safe passage from Longacres subdivision to access trails via under roadway tunnel. 8/20/2019 2:08 PM 84 Please preserve these precious spaces. With so much development in the surrounding area, it is critical to keep spaces untouched and natural. Thank you! 8/20/2019 1:39 PM 85 It would be great to bike, walk, and cross country ski 8/20/2019 1:33 PM 86 Have as much green space as possible 8/20/2019 1:05 PM 87 I love going for walks and runs in the Lake Ann Park! I would love more trails so I don't have to walk next to busy roads (Powers Blvd), as I do now.. 8/20/2019 12:40 PM 88 Hope it goes through. Would be great.8/20/2019 12:20 PM 89 It is a great area that I have run through often. Although I like the "rugged" appeal of what it is today, many more people would enjoy the area if enhanced in the manners I chose above. Thanks for asking for input. 8/20/2019 11:53 AM 90 Love these ideas. Could you please consider an off lease dog area that is fenced somewhere in this park? 8/20/2019 11:45 AM 91 Develop it so it is family friendly and also handicapped accessible.8/20/2019 11:44 AM 92 It would be nice to have it so one could walk or bike completely around the lakes. I think it would be important to have refuse cans available for pet waste bags and garbage. 8/20/2019 11:36 AM 93 Keep disability accessible, but also as natural as possible while combatti invasive plants.8/20/2019 11:27 AM 94 A running trail all of the way around would be great and a bike lane as well. More fishing spots would also be nice. 8/20/2019 11:20 AM 95 Thank you for this wonderful concept! I think, above all, we need to protect and preserve as much as possible of the "au natural". environment.....; encourage native growth of plants and animal habitat. The management of "groups" visiting is vital......but not at the expense of the natural area. 8/20/2019 11:13 AM 96 I think it would be good to extend the same format of Lake Ann to the rest of the park. Paved trails, benches, beaches, docks, etc. 8/20/2019 11:10 AM 97 Gravel Paths for bikes, walking and cross country skiing in winter. Cleared spots on shoreline of lakes to possibly fish/wade in the water and access for Ice fish 8/20/2019 11:06 AM 11 / 14 Lake Ann Input 98 Thank you for doing this survey! More trails and access to them, the better. Allowing as many people the opportunity to exercise and enjoy nature the healthier and happier we will be. Paved trails allow the elderly safe walking paths, moms with strollers a smooth ride and runners/walkers an enjoyable path to exercise on. 8/20/2019 10:55 AM 99 Please make sure that most of the trees and forest coverage is maintained. Would be nice to have a path all the way around the lake but making it as natural as possible. 8/20/2019 10:51 AM 100 I am neutral on crushed rock trails. I am also neutral on clearing trails in winter. Seems like a big expense and hassle but I don’t know for sure. Please keep as many large trees as possible. 8/20/2019 10:49 AM 101 Eventual loop would be awesome, in addition cleared trail for skate skiing or winter snow shoeing in winter. docks for fishing (lots of kids love fishing on lake Anne)! 8/20/2019 10:48 AM 102 I would us for birding and biking.8/20/2019 10:47 AM 103 Have you considered adding single track bike trails in the wooded areas in addition to paved trails around the lake? Mountain biking is growing as a sport in this area and I'm sure the Chan /Chaska team would love some additional single track to practice on. 8/20/2019 10:47 AM 104 Bike friendly single track trail!8/20/2019 10:44 AM 105 This is tough! As a person who utilizes this area a lot all year long, I can honestly say, it is one of the most beautiful places I walk! It's quiet and there is no better view than the changing maples in the fall (even though I have to hike through the stream to get there.) The most important thing to me would be to preserve the current habitat and landscape (I believe it is called an esker on the isthmus between the lakes.) The sloping hill where you can walk up high and see both lakes or down low and be closer to the Lake Ann shoreline. I appreciate the lack of snow removal on the current unofficial paths as it is a reminder of the seasons (boots in the spring and Yak-traks in the winter.) 8/20/2019 10:33 AM 106 I don't know what limit spaces to 1 trail corridor means. Everything else seems like amenities already available at other area parks I'd like to see the city add new unique amenities like nature playscapes, outdoor classrooms, hiking / x-country ski trails 8/20/2019 10:29 AM 107 The wildlife (turkeys, cayotes, deer..) that has been effected by the new housing development is seemingly displaced and making there way into residential neighborhood's near by (west 78th St and Galpin) and so I would like to see a park and trails developed in a less inasive way to allow the wildlife that resides in these areas to continue to thrive. 8/20/2019 10:25 AM 108 It would be nice to see things in the park that would attract kids and make them want to go there. maybe have rock climbing walls, mountain bike trail, a playground that is more natural with rope swings, tire swings, sandpits, and encourages kids to get dirty and play in nature - roll down hills etc. I think having wooden bridges like fish lake park in Plymouth and making it a spot where you want to go to take family photos and create memories 8/20/2019 10:23 AM 109 I would like to preserve some single track mountain bike trials that currently exist there.8/20/2019 10:20 AM 110 Its a shame that you couldn't preserve all of the land instead of putting in a housing development. Please keep development to a minimum for the wildlife. We need more spaces for wildlife. 8/20/2019 10:17 AM 111 Lets do something different! We have plenty of paved trails, let keep this gravel and less of a highway and more of a nature feel. The trails can be closer to the trees and vegetation with not having them paved. I would not mind a few low maintenance walking trails if its doable as well. 8/20/2019 10:16 AM 112 Crushed stone trails may lead to more falls by 0oldr residents.8/20/2019 10:15 AM 113 Trails for cross country skiing in winter same trails for mountain biking in summer.8/20/2019 10:02 AM 114 Like the idea of vistas/benches along the trail that provide sight lines to the bodies of water to which the trail is adjacent. 8/20/2019 10:02 AM 115 What are the plans to handle bikes on the trails? Would be nice to have a space for outdoor education/demonstrations. Can Chanhassen work out a discount for residents for the Minnewashta Park? 8/20/2019 9:51 AM 116 Trails for walking/biking and easy access would be nice 8/20/2019 9:31 AM 12 / 14 Lake Ann Input 117 How about just leave it alone as is? It’s beautiful and more human access is only going to cause for crowding and taking away from the small lake vibe it has now. Lake Ann is a small lake- we don’t need more access points or more trails. This isn’t lake Calhoun. Let’s not pretend this lake can handle that much traffic. It’s already too busy with us that live near it as is. Opening up to the new neighborhoods is going to rob everyone of that “get away” feeling we have by it being an all natural small lake. 8/20/2019 9:27 AM 118 There is entirely too much goose droppings there.8/17/2019 5:59 PM 119 It would be nice if there was a better way to run into the park. Right now you need to run directly on the road and cut through parking lots. Easier access from the surrounding neighborhoods would be both safer and nicer. 8/17/2019 4:33 PM 120 No 8/16/2019 6:43 AM 121 I think the space should remain as natural as possible. One of the draws to this space is that it is natural/undeveloped, there are very few beaches and parks like this in the metro. 8/15/2019 3:50 PM 122 As a person that lives in Greenwood Shores I dislike the imprint you are even thinking of. I know many of the neighbors feel this way, preserve the beautiful space and don’t commercialize it into something else. That is what the neighboring parks like Minnewashta are for. 8/15/2019 6:43 AM 123 Generally, less landscaped and more natural. I’m excited for a Trail all the way around the lake, and support one main paved trail (for easier access for strollers and wheelchairs, etc) and stone or mulch trails for additional exploring. 8/15/2019 2:40 AM 124 A small nature education ‘cabin’ added somewhere on the trail (similar to Behren’s cabin at the Arboretum) would be a wonderful addition. Photos and small plaques can briefly explain some history of the area and what flora and fauna is observable on the trails. It would help all ages to take greater advantage of the trails and have a deeper appreciation of the area. LOVE the boardwalks in the proposal! 8/15/2019 2:12 AM 125 Sounds beautiful, wonderment around a safe space at lake for pups to swim. Currently have to leave our city to do that. So... would imagine I would stay here instead. 8/14/2019 1:47 PM 126 If closed in winter, consider leaving open to cross country skis and/or snowshoe use 8/14/2019 3:35 AM 127 A large natural buffer is the best thing for Lake Ann. As much as possible, keep the shoreline looking wild when viewing from the other side of the lake. Please keep trails natural in the winter. This area would be beautiful for snowshoeing or cross country skiing. Thank you. 8/11/2019 3:06 PM 128 I support any proposal that keeps the land as natural as possible, minus the buckthorn. Allowing dogs off-leash away from paved trails (similar to the rules at Purgatory Park in Minnetonka) would be a bonus. 8/11/2019 3:05 PM 129 Keep as natural as possible, no trails at all would be ideal 8/10/2019 10:49 AM 130 A dog friendly beach space! We are a very dog friendly community, but we have no place to go swimming with our dogs without being chased off. 8/10/2019 9:50 AM 131 Connect these trails to other existing trails outside of this area 8/10/2019 9:03 AM 132 Work some signature destination into the plan. Either a picturesque bridge structure somewhere or a more natural oriented playground, or a public treehouse observation. Something that makes the park special and unique. I REALLY like the idea of a public observation treehouse in a location. Kids and adults alike will gravitate to it. 8/10/2019 4:33 AM 133 Crushed stone would be fine if it's compacted enough for kids to bike on.8/10/2019 3:31 AM 134 Parking is currently an issue as there is no where to park by the smaller beach closer to Lake Lucy 8/9/2019 9:10 PM 135 Natural surfaces only. Really. Do not pave. Paving is bad for environment, costly to maintain long- term, and ruins “nature-retreat-within-city” experience. 8/9/2019 6:22 PM 136 We already have a great number of paved trails and it would be nice to feel like we’re taking a step away from the city within our own city by maintaining some elements of nature, like crushed stone trails. 8/9/2019 4:22 PM 137 This is such a beautiful area, I hope the changes made will enhance the area even more.8/9/2019 4:20 PM 138 please practice non-chemical ways of controlling weeds. keep the area natural & promote natural flower species. 8/9/2019 9:27 AM 13 / 14 Lake Ann Input 139 They’re are already fairly defined natural trails, I think those routes should be preserved as to limit human impact, plus then there doesn’t need to be any big trail building projects. 8/9/2019 7:37 AM 140 Natural style parks/obstacles for kids 8/9/2019 6:43 AM 141 Paved trails are costly to maintain especially in wetland areas.8/9/2019 6:43 AM 142 A little cleaning with a very small play set along the trail would be a amazing for parents running/walking the the trail to have just a small stop to look forward to 8/9/2019 6:39 AM 143 I would like to see just the crushed stone trails and to preserve as much of the wildland as possible. 8/9/2019 6:36 AM 144 Its too bad this development is going up and destroying the beauty there once was.8/9/2019 6:34 AM 145 Informational/education plaques where appropriate (for example at Riley Creek, or an impressive example of mature forest) 8/9/2019 6:28 AM 146 Please limit tree removal 8/9/2019 6:28 AM 147 Do not muddy this area with people/ mess that a beach would present. Be honest with the community on the area that they city of Chanhassen has and that it may or may not ever have access to so these packages are not “over sold”. 8/9/2019 6:19 AM 148 I strongly feel the park and trail extensions should extend further with a tunnel under Galpin similar to the tunnel under 41 to Lake Minnewashta to create a full trail connection experience. Also, how and when does the remaining Lake Ann parcel north of W 78th between Lake Ann and the Prince development become part of the equation to prevent another Prince catastrophe? 8/9/2019 6:15 AM 149 Unpaved trails are difficult for strollers and loose rock can be 'slippery' for bike tires. I like the option of having both paved and unpaved for everyone to enjoy them as they see fit while also preserving the natural habitat. Thanks for all your hard work on this! 8/9/2019 5:59 AM 150 Have rental of kayaks/canoes/paddle boards available. Model a beach area after lake Riley’s update. Make this space usable for all. 8/9/2019 5:50 AM 151 I'm excited at the prospect of being able to bike from our house near the northern boundary of Chanhassen down to Lake Ann entirely on bike trails without crossing any major streets. It'll be a much better connection to the parks for my family and reduce our reliance on our car for getting around to the playgrounds and beaches. 8/9/2019 5:44 AM 152 I am opposed to any paved trails. The number of trails and winter access is less important, but pavement is too unnatural. I also hope the city considers survey results when planning the park, but not to blindly implement the top vote getters. Ultimately we should defer to our Parks specialists to preserve nature first, and allow for human interaction second. 8/9/2019 5:26 AM 153 Please prevent all use of any motorized vehicle, e.g. snowmobiles, ATVs, etc.8/9/2019 5:22 AM 14 / 14 Lake Ann Input CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Key Financial Strategy: Pavement Management Followup Discussion Q & A Section 5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.2. Prepared By Jason Wedel, Director of Public Works/City Engineer File No: ATTACHMENTS: Pavement Management Questions & Answers Page 1 of 5 Can the utility companies distinguish or bill properties in Chanhassen on a different basis? Can the city exempt properties on private streets from a Franchise Fee? • The direct answer is Minnesota Statutes, Section 216B.03 provides that "[r]ates shall not be unreasonably preferential, unreasonably prejudicial or discriminatory, but shall be sufficient, equitable and consistent in application to a class of customers." • In addition the City’s Attorney on this matter, James Strommen, clearly points out in his letter dated to city council of November 13, 2018: “courts acknowledge that precise equality in imposing fees or taxes to support government cannot be precise or is "impossible" given the inherent disparity in use of or benefit from the tax use across the taxpayer base.” We have found no case even considering a franchise fee exemption due to the argument that a certain percentage of transportation within the City was reduced by private road use. Even the unlikely event of total non-use of public roads would not afford exemption. Similarly, it is settled law that school district residents without children using the schools are not entitled to gain exemption from referendum levies to build and maintain the schools. We already pay high taxes so why should we have to pay more for roads? • The city portion of your property tax bill is only 20% of the total. The school district and county each have nearly double the amount of taxes they collect on property owners. • The City of Chanhassen has the lowest Tax Rate in Carver County and among the bottom 1% of all tax rates in the entire Twin Cities. • The City Tax Levy increase (new growth) for the past eleven years has resulted in the average home paying the same or less in city property taxes every year. Because we live on a private street and use the public roads at a fraction of the amount others use public roads, we should get a reduced franchise fee or be exempt. • As noted previously, separate or exempt fees within billing classes is not allowed per state statute. • The city council is considering the use of Franchise Fees rather than a property tax levy to pay for a portion of the roads in order to have more equity between commercial and non-property tax paying properties rather than leaving the largest burden on residential properties. • Example: Based on the proposed funding scenario the average home will pay about $146/year. If a property tax levy is issued instead of a franchise fee as currently structured, the average home would pay about $196/year. Page 2 of 5 What has prompted the need for increased funding for street replacement? • The life expectancy of a typical street is 50 years. Based on this, the streets that were constructed in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s are now due for replacement. During the 1960’s the city was adding approximately 0.5 miles of streets per year. In the 1970’s new development increased significantly and the city was adding approximately 2.7 miles of streets per year. The chart below illustrates the miles of street that have been added to the city’s street network over the last 50 years. • The city is now at the transition from 0.5 miles per year to 2.7 miles per year, so an average of 1.6 miles per year of street replacement is necessary to maintain the city’s street network or the average quality of the street network will continue to decline. The cost for replacement is $1.5M per mile x 1.6 miles = $2.4M. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1960196319661969197219751978198119841987199019931996199920022005200820112014201720202023202620292032203520382041204420472050205320562059206220652068Cummulative MilesYear Original Construction Replacement (~50 years) 0.5 Miles/Year Current Year Page 3 of 5 • Similarly, it is critical to perform mill & overlay projects as part of the life cycle maintenance of a street. A mill & overlay involves milling off the top 1.5 inches of bituminous and paving a new surface across the entire street. The appropriate timing for completing mill & overlay projects is when a street is between 20 and 25 years of age. After that a street typically decays to a point where a mill & overlay is no longer viable. • Based on the chart above, looking back 25 years the city was adding 3.5 miles of streets per year. The city should therefore be completing 3.5 miles of mill & overlay projects each year to maintain the city’s street network or the quality of the streets will continue to decline. The cost for mill & overlay projects is $0.35M per mile x 3.5 miles = $1.2M per year. • The required annual street maintenance cost is therefore $3.6M. The current annual budget for street maintenance is $385,000. The funding shortfall is therefore $3,215,000. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1960196319661969197219751978198119841987199019931996199920022005200820112014201720202023202620292032203520382041204420472050205320562059206220652068Cummulative MilesYear Original Construction Mill & Overlay (~25 years)Current Year Page 4 of 5 How many miles of public streets and private streets are located within the city? • There are 115 miles of public streets within the city and 25 miles of private streets. What is the difference between a public street and a private street? • A public street is owned and maintained by the city and a private street is typically owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Public streets are designed to meet minimum standards for width and include additional right-of-way beyond the actual street pavement to provide area for utilities such as gas and electric to be installed as well as for sidewalks and snow storage. Private streets are narrower and do not have any right-of-way. This allows the homes on private streets to be located much closer to the street. • Private streets are primarily located in areas where the housing products are either townhomes or apartments. The primary reason for private streets is that the developers that construct those neighborhoods can fit many more housing units on their property as opposed to what they would be able to build if they had public streets. By having more housing units on their property they are able to keep the price of the homes lower. The tradeoff the developers decide to make is that the homeowners association will need to maintain the private streets in perpetuity. Do other cities use Franchise Fees? • Yes, all seven of our neighboring cities have franchise fees. They include Chaska, Eden Prairie, Excelsior, Minnetonka, Shakopee, Shorewood, and Victoria. There are at least 62 other cities within the twin cities that have a Franchise Fee. Can the Franchise Fees be used for something other than roads? • The current city council intends for all of the revenue generated from the franchise fee to be used exclusively for streets. However, future city councils could change that and use the franchise fees for something other than streets. The pavement management fund is reviewed with the city council on an annual basis as part of the budget process. That review will continue going forward and any changes in the use of the Franchise Fee would need to be a part of that discussion. We just had our street re-done two summers ago and had to pay thousands of dollars. Now you want me to pay a franchise fee for others? Doesn't seem fair • The city council has already determined that the practice of assessing 40% of the total cost of the project to the benefiting properties will continue into the future. So all property owners will be treated the same as previously assessed projects. The franchise fee and property tax levy increase that is being considered is for the city’s portion or the remaining 60% of the total cost of each of the projects. Page 5 of 5 100% against it the franchise fee, $10 a month for 20 years is the eternal tax. Raise the property taxes 1% for 2/3 years and be done with it. • Whether a property tax or franchise fee is issued the funding need will go on for an identical amount of time going forward into the future. Increasing the property tax levy by 1% per year for three years would only generate about $400,000 in funding for the pavement management program which is about $2 million short of the funding need. A property tax increase would need to be in the range of 15%-18%. Charge the 15 garbage truck companies who drive up and down my cul de sac a fee to collect garbage in our city. Those trucks fly around our streets and cause tons of wear not to mention it’s dangerous how fast they drive. • The city does not have statutory ability to charge a special tax or wheelage tax like the county has authority to do. All neighborhoods that are interested have the ability to organize your collection services. The city has a step-by-step guide on how to organize your collection services on the city website at http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/111/Garbage-Recycling CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Proclamation Chanhassen Red Birds 2019 State Amateur Baseball Class "B" Champions Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Item No: C.1. Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Superintendent File No: ATTACHMENTS: 2019 Chanhassen Red Birds Proclamation Proclamation RECOGNIZING THE 2019 STATE AMATEUR BASEBALL CLASS “B” CHAMPIONS SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 RED BIRDS DAY IN CHANHASSEN Mayor Elise Ryan WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Red Birds town baseball team became the Minnesota Amateur Baseball Class “B” State Champions on Monday, September 2rd, 2019 during the playing of the 96th Annual Minnesota Baseball Association tournament, and WHEREAS, the team had a season record of 32 wins and only 5 losses, and WHEREAS, the team defeated the Dundas Dukes in the final two games of the state tournament by the scores of 8 to 1 and 9 to 2, and WHEREAS, the team was coached by Mike Ralston, Mike Arnold, and scorekeeper Matt Schrad, and WHEREAS, the players on the team are: Brandon Arnold, Nick Smith, Derek Smith, Michael Jurgella, Aaron Pfaff, Aaron Kloeppner, Matthew Smith, Logan Spitzack, Justin Arnold, Luke Roskam, Joe Jersak, Justin Bach, Riley Johnson, Ryan Diers, John Straka, John Eischens, Miles Nablo, Zach Hartford, Dominic Reed, Zach Hoffmann, Garrett Fischer, Justin Anderson, Chris Choles, Justin Jeronimous, and Shawn Riesgraf. NOW BE IT RESOLVED, that the Honorable Mayor Elise Ryan and the members of the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, on behalf of all citizens, do hereby recognize the Chanhassen Red Birds for being the 2019 Minnesota Amateur Baseball Class “B” State Champions and for being the pride of Chanhassen and do hereby declare September 9, 2019 Chanhassen Red Birds day in Chanhassen, Minnesota. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated August 26, 2019 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the minutes dated August 26, 2019.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Work Session Minutes Summary Minutes Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 26, 2019 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 4:30 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, and Councilwoman Coleman. Councilman Campion arrived during the budget presentation. STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Jason Wedel, Greg Sticha, Kate Aanenson, Jake Foster, Todd Hoffman, Chief Don Johnson and Richard Rice ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INTERVIEW. Council members asked Peter Adolphson for background information and why he’s interested in serving on this commission. UPDATE ON ARBORETUM AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND FLYOVER VIDEO OF TH 101 CONSTRUCTION. Jason Wedel provided an update on the Arboretum area transportation plan’s purpose and description. He reviewed the make up of cities involved in the stakeholder advisory committee, existing conditions at intersections along the Highway 5 corridor, neighborhood and open house meetings, and project timeline. Mayor Ryan asked for clarification on who is managing this project. Jason Wedel played a flyover video of the Highway101 construction project from Pioneer Trail to Flying Cloud Drive. DETAILED BUDGET PRESENTATION. Greg Sticha explained that health care insurance proposals came in better than expected showing a decrease as opposed to a 15 percent increase. He provided details for the following budgets: legislative, administration, finance, legal, property assessment, MIS, City Hall, elections, library, police administration, fire department explaining that most budgets are showing little or no significant changes, Staff and council members discussed the increase in duty crew hours and funding in 2020. Greg Sticha continued with discussion of code enforcement, community service, engineering, and street maintenance. Councilman McDonald asked if pothole repairs for 2020 are addressed in this budget. Greg Sticha continued with street lighting and signals, fleet department, planning commission, planning administration, senior commission, Park and Recreation Commission, park and rec administration, recreation center, Lake Ann operations, and park maintenance. Mayor Ryan asked how the request for an additional neighborhood ice skating rink will affect the park maintenance budget. Greg Sticha continued with discussion of the senior center, recreation programs, self supporting programs, recreation sports, before City Council Work Session – August 26, 2019 2 reviewing potential service level and levy reduction ideas which will be easier with the decrease in health insurance costs. He explained that staff will be presenting a general fund levy equal to new growth. Mayor Ryan asked that staff research how the number of Chanhassen employees compare to key financial strategy cities and if there is a need to increase the number of employees in certain departments and asked if the Historical Society’s request to use the old village hall is considered in the budget. DISCUSS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS. Mayor Ryan outlined the process for making these appointments. Councilwoman Coleman explained her picks as being Adam Schafer, Steve Stamy, Mike Leonard, Anne Heinz, and Peter Adolphson. Councilman Campion explained his picks of Kathy Donovan, James Sanford, Steve Stamy, Mike Leonard (no), James Sanford, Anne Heinz, and Adam Schafer being on the bubble. Councilwoman Tjornhom explained her picks as being Steve Stamy, James Ebeling, Kathy Donovan, James Sanford, and Anne Heinz. Councilman McDonald explained his picks as being Anita Ward, Steve Stamy, James Ebeling, Anne Heinz and Adam Schafer. Mayor Ryan discussed her picks as being James Sanford, Kathy Donovan, Steve Stamy, Anne Heinz, Peter Adolphson as being on the bubble, and James Ebeling. The following is the results of council members picks. Steve Stamy and Anne Heinz with 5 James Ebeling with 4 James Sanford and Kathy Donovan with 3 Adam Schafer with 2 After discussion it was decided to appoint Steve Stamy and Anne Heinz to 3 year terms and James Ebeling, James Sanford and Kathy Donovan to 2 year terms Todd Gerhardt reviewed how the staff will proceed with setting up a meeting schedule for the Economic Development Commission. Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 6:30 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES AUGUST 26, 2019 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Jake Foster, Kate Aanenson, Jason Wedel, Todd Hoffman, Greg Sticha, Jerry Ruegemer, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Raymond Roob 8584 Chanhassen Hills Drive So. Connie Schibilla Love INC Brian and Jean Steckling 8040 Hidden Court Larry Koch 471 Bighorn Drive Linda Norderhaug 7603 Frontier Trail Roger and Dorothy Downing 7200 Juniper Avenue Joel Judy Nybeck 7404 Frontier Trail Mack Titus 2747 Century Trail Jay Schreur 8376 Suffolk Drive Carla Thompson 8524 Mayfield Court Ray Murray 6618 Brenden Court Lucas Souza 8091 Hidden Court Mark Page 10 Hill Street JoAnn Syverson 489 Pleasant View Road Donna Burt 6645 Horseshoe Curve Steve Corkery 40 Twin Maple Lane PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: TEEN VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION. Mayor Ryan presented certificates of appreciation to the following teen volunteers: Alex Haider, Amelia Wennerstrom, Ben Schubbe, Brian Gilbertson, Bryce Lesinski, Callie Lizak, Demitre Stampley Jr., Derek Puzak, Finn O’Brien, Holley Marini, Hope Durenberger, Jack Liwienski, Joshua Boevers, Kate Yezzi, Matthew Brands, Melanie Stewart-Hester, Olivia Guyer, Peter McNabb, Rebecca Ernst, and Zoe Griffin. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: City Council Summary – August 26, 2019 2 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated August 12, 2019 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated July 16, 2019 3. Approve 2020 Service Agreement for Joint Assessment with Carver County Assessor 4. Consider Site Plan Review for Life Time Fitness Parking Lot Addition 5. Glendale Homes: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract and Construction Plans 6. Resolution #2019-40: Approve Quote for Sanitary Sewer Televising (I/I) 7. Approve Contract for Repair of Floor Drains at Public Works Building 8. Approve Fireworks Display at St. Hubert Catholic Community, September 14, 2019 9. Approve Indemnification and Cooperation Agreement Regarding the Flying Cloud Airport Joint Zoning Board and the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance 10. Approve Driveway Easement for Control Concepts 11. Resolution #2019-41: Accept $2,500 Donation to Fire Department from CenterPoint Energy 12. Resolution #2019-42: Accept Donation from Love INC for Donations to the Senior Center Maple Room (Memory Café) All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. HONOR 20 YEAR RETIREE FIREFIGHTER BARRY STECKLING. Chief Don Johnson presented 20 year retiree firefighter Barry Steckling with a signed black helmet, badge, and flowers for his wife Anita. Fire Relief President Matt Kutz presented Barry Steckling with a black axe from the Fire Relief Association. MARK PAGE CITIZEN ACTION REQUEST FORM. Mark Page, speaking as a riparian owner, discussed the wake surfing issue on Lotus Lake and the results of the survey conducted by the Lotus Lake Conservation Association. Larry Koch, 471 Bighorn Drive reiterated the issue of high water and damage being caused by wake surfing boats on Lotus Lake. JoAnn Syverson, 489 Pleasant View Road, and a member of the Big 3, explained that it has not been fun doing the work of presenting the information on damage being done by wake surfing boats. Donna Burt, City Council Summary – August 26, 2019 3 6645 Horseshoe Curve responded to Mr. Page’s remarks about personal responsibility and that they are prepared to address their property’s shoreline but discussed the problem with water quality, ecology of the lake and the tree that is about to fall on the sewer line that runs along her property. Steve Corkery, 40 Twin Maple Lane discussed that the water quality of Lotus Lake was poor before wake surfing and his belief that the role of the City Council is to be working on issues like the quality of city streets rather than wake surf boats on Lotus Lake. FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE. Chief Don Johnson provided the monthly statistics for July and August regarding staffing, calls for service, training, assisting with Tour de Tonka, Night to Unite block parties, the Hopkins police officer funeral for Brooklyn Park as part of the Minnesota Chief’s Association Assistance Group, and the Fire Department Open House scheduled for October 7th. Lt. Lance Pearce presented the update on July calls for service, participation in Night to Unite, and upcoming community relations events. PUBLIC FEEDBACK ON PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT FUNDING. Jason Wedel and Greg Sticha presented the staff report on this item. Mack Titus, 4727 Century Boulevard asked for clarification on the miles of public roads versus private roads. Craig Mertz thanked the city staff for doing a wonderful job of coming up with a solution for a very difficult problem and urged the City to approve the proposed franchise fee. Jay Schreur, 8376 Suffolk Drive, representing 3 townhome neighborhoods on Powers Boulevard, discussed their concern with having to pay assessments to maintain their private streets and being charged to pay for public streets. Carla Thompson, 8524 Mayfield Court, Mission Hills Townhomes explained that their association just paid to maintain their private streets and the concern with being charged to pay for public streets as well. Ray Murray, 6618 Brenden Court discussed the state of his road being used by people to drop off their kids to walk to Minnetonka Middle School West. Lucas Souza, 8091 Hidden Court thanked the City and council for providing public services such as the library, public streets and explained that he is in favor of the franchise fees as a means to pay for public services. Mayor Ryan explained that staff will include any additional follow up questions that people may have at home or watching online and make those comments a part of the Q and A list for discussion. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS. Todd Gerhardt presented the staff report on this item. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to make the following appointments to the Economic Development Commission: Steven Stamy and Anne Heinze for 3 year terms ending March 31, 2022; and Kathy Donovan, James Sanford, and James Ebeling for 2 year terms ending March 31, 2021. All voted in favor, except Councilman McDonald and Councilwoman Tjornhom who opposed. The motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. City Council Summary – August 26, 2019 4 COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan recognized Love Inc. for donations to the senior center Maple Room which is going to be turned into a Memory Café. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Todd Gerhardt explained that as a follow up to the appointments to the Economic Development Commission staff will send letters to all the applicants. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 26, 2019 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Jake Foster, Kate Aanenson, Jason Wedel, Todd Hoffman, Greg Sticha, Jerry Ruegemer, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Raymond Roob 8584 Chanhassen Hills Drive So. Connie Schibilla Love INC Brian and Jean Steckling 8040 Hidden Court Larry Koch 471 Bighorn Drive Linda Norderhaug 7603 Frontier Trail Roger and Dorothy Downing 7200 Juniper Avenue Joel Judy Nybeck 7404 Frontier Trail Mack Titus 2747 Century Trail Jay Schreur 8376 Suffolk Drive Carla Thompson 8524 Mayfield Court Ray Murray 6618 Brenden Court Lucas Souza 8091 Hidden Court Mark Page 10 Hill Street JoAnn Syverson 489 Pleasant View Road Donna Burt 6645 Horseshoe Curve Steve Corkery 40 Twin Maple Lane Mayor Ryan: Good evening. Today is August 26, 2019 and I call this Chanhassen City Council meeting to order. Ladies and gentleman would you please stand and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. Again good evening everybody and welcome to our council meeting this evening. To those of you that are watching at home or livestreaming from the Chanhassen website thank you for joining us. We have a full chambers this evening. For the record we have all of our council members present tonight so our first action is our agenda approval. Council members are there any modifications to the agenda as printed? If not we will proceed with the publishes agenda. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: TEEN VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION. Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 2 Mayor Ryan: On behalf of the City Council, I think a lot of them are in the hall so let’s wait for them to join us. Welcome everyone. Keep squeezing in if you can. I know it’s a packed house. Don’t be shy. I know teenagers never get embarrassed. Come on in. Alright. On behalf of the City Council and the Park and Recreation Commission I would like to recognize the 2019 teen volunteers. These 13 to 16 year olds were selected to serve as volunteers for city sponsored recreation programs from June through August. The programs consisted of the Old National Bank Summer Concert Series, Senior Center activities, Lake Ann Adventure Camp, Exploring Science Camp, the Penny Carnival, youth sports at the Rec Center and the Discovery Playground program. The City would like to thank this year’s teen volunteers for their service. Together, you won’t believe this but together they compiled over 479 hours of service to the City of Chanhassen. I’m going to ad lib here real quickly. I just want to again acknowledge how awesome it is that I know how busy all of your schedules are with sports and activities and traveling and fun over the summer and the fact that you all took the time to volunteer on behalf of the City of Chanhassen is something that we’re all very proud of and we think it is for lack of a better word super cool so we hope that service becomes part of your life because once you get a bug for it I promise it will stay with your forever so I’m going to come forward and when I call your name please meet me up front and receive your certificate. And I will do my best to pronounce your name. I grew up, my first name is Elise and I was called Elsie all my life so I will do my best to get it right. Alright first up Alex Haider. Please come forward. Alright you want to step to the side please. You can stay up here with us. Next Amelia Wennerstrom. Ben Schubbe. I knew him when he was really little. Next up Brian Gilbertson. Bryce Lesinski. Demitre Stampley Jr. Jack Liwienski. Josh Boevers. And last but not least Matthew Brands. Jerry Ruegemer: Okay now everybody let’s get together please. Two lines. Mayor Ryan: Congratulations you guys. Todd Hoffman: Kate? Kate Yezzi. Mayor Ryan: Thanks everybody. Appreciate your service. Where did all my stuff go? Sorry, so many papers up here. Well next is our consent agenda. Alright sorry about the pause here. Next up we have consent agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated August 12, 2019 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated July 16, 2019 3. Approve 2020 Service Agreement for Joint Assessment with Carver County Assessor Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 3 4. Consider Site Plan Review for Life Time Fitness Parking Lot Addition 5. Glendale Homes: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract and Construction Plans 6. Resolution #2019-40: Approve Quote for Sanitary Sewer Televising (I/I) 7. Approve Contract for Repair of Floor Drains at Public Works Building 8. Approve Fireworks Display at St. Hubert Catholic Community, September 14, 2019 9. Approve Indemnification and Cooperation Agreement Regarding the Flying Cloud Airport Joint Zoning Board and the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance 10. Approve Driveway Easement for Control Concepts 11. Resolution #2019-41: Accept $2,500 Donation to Fire Department from CenterPoint Energy 12. Resolution #2019-42: Accept Donation from Love INC for Donations to the Senior Center Maple Room (Memory Café) All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. HONOR 20 YEAR RETIREE FIREFIGHTER BARRY STECKLING. Mayor Ryan: We will begin with our scheduled visitor presentations and then if anybody wants to come up afterwards I will welcome you at that time. So Chief I will turn it over to you as we honor a 20 year retiree. Chief. Chief Don Johnson: Thank you Mayor and Council. I also brought with me 40 some of your very dedicated volunteer firefighters tonight to help us celebrate with that. Tonight we’re here to celebrate retired firefighter Barry Steckling. If I can invite Barry and his family up to stand with me tonight. Council as you know when a firefighter retires after 20 years, this is one of our celebrations so tonight with Barry is his wife Anita and their daughter Holly and son Tim. First off I need Holly and Tim we recognize that you also service. Barry Steckling: Tom. Chief Don Johnson: Sorry Tom. We recognize that you also served 20 years on the fire department so the missed Monday nights. The family events and Barry taking off in the middle of the night most of the time to come and help us, we also appreciate your service to the City and the fire department as well so thank you for that. Barry I looked at your file to prepare for this Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 4 evening and you know over 20 years there’s not a lot in there but in your defense we didn’t do a lot of good record keeping back then. The one thing I did find was something a little, this was Barry’s picture that they took. Now it was kind of like a mug shot but you could tell a little bit that 20 years of fire fighting does kind of take a toll on a guy so. Thanks Barry. In all honesty you said you’re not really good with dates so I did find some. The application for the Chanhassen Fire Department was dated July 13th of 1998. Your start date was September of ’98 so it was a pretty quick process to get you on. I venture to say that Firefighter Steckling probably still maintains the highest overall overnight percentage of any firefighter on this department. Right up to the end we could always count on Barry showing up for the late calls. Also in your file was an Attaboy Letter for finding a safe in the water while serving on the dive team. It was a thank you letter for a crime that was investigated and the dive team was part of finding some of the evidence in that case. Barry recounts being on the Chanhassen Fire Department Dive Team for many years and transferring to the Carver Sheriff’s Dive Team when Chan’s team came to an end. Barry was the Chan Dive Coordinator while on the Carver Fire Team. Barry remembers helping with dive operations from the boat when the Carver Team responded to the 35W bridge collapse in 2007. Barry retired earlier this year with 20 years of service. As I’ve said many times 20 years as a paid on call volunteer firefighter is a significant contribution to the city. Barry was very active his entire career and remained active until his final Monday evening and attended training with us that night. From all of us on the fire department thank you for Firefighter Steckling for 20 years of dedicated service to the citizens of Chanhassen and the Chanhassen Fire Department. Barry Steckling: Thank you. Chief Don Johnson: This always comes with gifts so we have a few things to hand out. Anita we did have a small gift for you so I’ll have Assistant Chief Smith bring that up. Thank you and for recognition of your service and lending us to Barry many, many evenings. Part of what we like to do is we hand out a helmet so Barry’s last helmet with the badge number that he wore, we all took time to sign that again so it ends up being some decorations that Barry can be proud of and thank you for your service Assistant John Smith will hand you that. And we’ve also switched our badges over in the last few years so Barry will also receive his last badge with his badge number on it to serve in remembrance of his 20 years of service and Assistant Chief Van Aston has that. Finally I would ask that Relief President Matt Kutz come up and assist with the next presentation. Matt Kutz: This is for you Barry. On behalf of the Chanhassen Fire Relief Association, that’s past and current members, we’d like to present you this axe for your dedication and service to the citizens of Chanhassen. Appreciate all you do and we’re going to miss you. Barry Steckling: Thank you. Chief Don Johnson: Want me to hold anything? Turn it over to you this evening. Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 5 Barry Steckling: Well I’d like to thank the Mayor, council and Chief, it’s been the most rewarding thing I’ve ever done and really enjoyed it. Great group of people to work with and loved every minute of it so thank you very much. Mayor Ryan: Just on behalf of council and the community at large you look at your family and you have served all the families of Chanhassen and we are truly appreciative and grateful for your years of service. You know when you look at serving or volunteering for anything for 20 years that’s a considerable amount of time and the fact that you take into the demands and the requirement and the pressure that comes along with being a firefighter and for your commitment for 20 years it is truly remarkable so again on behalf of the families that you serve, everybody here on City Council we want to wish you congratulations. We want to extend our appreciation and thanks to your family for your commitment and service in supporting a firefighter who is always out the door at a moment’s notice so thank you for your service. Enjoy your retirement and appreciate what you’ve done for Chanhassen. Barry Steckling: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Chief Don Johnson: Mayor if you could just give us a couple minutes I’ll get everybody out of here. We have cake and refreshments. Mayor Ryan: Enjoy. Thank you everybody. Appreciate all your service as well. MARK PAGE CITIZEN ACTION REQUEST FORM. Mayor Ryan: The next item on for our visitor presentation is a citizen action request form that was submitted by Mark Page. Mark are you here to, there you are. Please come forward. Mark Page: Thank you Madam Mayor. I’ve always wanted to say that. And council members. So my name is Mark Page and I live at 10 Hill Street and I’m here to discuss the wake surfing issue on Lotus Lake. I’m a riparian owner and reside on the south end of the lake. When the LLCA and what I call the Big 3, and I do that with all respect. They’re Ms. Syverson, Mr. Coke and. Larry Koch: It’s Koch by the way. Mark Page: Koch yep, I’ve always butchered that. Sorry Larry. And Ms. Burt. When they brought this issue up they always said it was a big issue. They said it was a big issue and I was contended how they came up with that number and I talked to the LLCA, Ms. Susla directly and I said, she kept saying there’s many, many complaints and I said how many is many. Well we didn’t keep records. Go figure. I think they could remember who it was but if we really go back to the survey and try to quantify the sides of this argument we go back to the survey and there Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 6 were 95 respondents. 95 respondents on roughly 400 households. Roughly and check me if I’m wrong, roughly about 150 riparian owners and 250 lake associations. 400. That’s already 95 out of 400, that’s under 25 percent of the affected issues and as we keep forgetting this is a public lake. That doesn’t take into account anybody off the lake. Now if we dig down even farther there’s one particular question that said, first of all I’ve argued with their survey itself. It was greatly skewed. Gallop or Harris would have a field day with this. It was written by people who were on that side of the argument so I can’t prove that in any ways but that’s my gut check. But let’s dig into the survey. One particular question, has wake surfing adversely affected your use or enjoyment on the lake. Again arguing it’s going to skewed but we won’t go there anymore. Never was 34 percent. That was 32 people. Occasionally 38 percent. That was 36. Often was 28 and that was 27 people. Okay. The other side of the argument has always used occasionally with their numbers and they somehow get to a number of 72 percent. Well it actually isn’t. First of all I wouldn’t say that occasionally should be in their number but then do they really count, I’d say no. This does not even, again it doesn’t take into account any of the lake guests so 28 percent of 95 residents is roughly 30 percent. 27 out of 400 is less than 6.7 percent of the issue. Councilman McDonald you said well how do I know that this is a silent majority. Well I would argue it’s absolutely a vocal minority. It’s 3 people. In fact when I try and keep finding names of other people on the opposite side of this argument we don’t know. We do know Mr. Coke. Larry Koch: Koch. Mark Page: Koch sorry. Larry. Mr. Koch. JoAnn and Ms. Burt. Okay. We don’t know anybody else and I would contend if they don’t even come, if they don’t sign any petitions, if we don’t know who they are this is a very, very narrow, narrow set of the people arguing against this so very quickly, and for what it’s worth when we had the famed work session the media didn’t get it. They didn’t know who all came. It was almost on the wake, on the sportsman side of the argument. 60 people were on that. 5 were on the other side. That’s 8 percent. 8 percent. It was flooded and after we were a little bit bamboozled by the lake association we gathered those 60 people within 48 hours notice. Within 48 hours of notice. I would argue it’s far greater and the reason no one spoke is because you already made your decisions multiple times. You’ve answered the same question Mr. Wedel 4 or 5 times. You said it’s going to happen next year, sorry. Okay regarding the high water mark so you’ve kept, it’s been answered and answered and at this point it almost seems like it’s badgering. But let me go really quickly, there are roughly, in addition there’s roughly I said about 150 riparian owners. An informal survey shows there’s about 20 to 25 owners who have not repaired their shoreline. 80 percent have done the riprap. Most of it 3 to 1 that the DNR suggests. In fact I know most of you have gone on cruises to witness some of this so then it goes to me about responsibility. Even if the argument that it’s absolutely erosion because of the wake surf boats, that I don’t completely agree but let’s just for the argument sake it is all the wake board boats. It doesn’t matter. Still comes down to responsibility. This side of the argument is asking you 5 to fix their problems. They’re asking you 5 to fix their problems. I don’t own a wake board boat. I wake surf for 42 seconds a year. That’s the best I can do. But to me it’s about responsibility and it’s about, and it’s about limited government interaction which this is a fairly conservative board, take it or leave it. So, and I’m Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 7 going to use one example. We get every single leaf that every single leaf that comes down to the south shore blows into the south shore and we, and about 6 properties get it including city property. Okay. We get every single leaf. We pay $1,000 a year in kids, unskilled labor to get rid of those leaves. Okay. Now if I came to the City and said hey would you reimburse me the $1,000? After you start, stop laughing under your breath you would say no Mr. Page, our staff has checked this and it’s outside our purview. I wouldn’t ask anyway and I wouldn’t ask the LLCA. They’d laugh at me too. It’s about personal responsibility. Does it blow? Yeah. It’s no fun. It’s $1,000 bucks a year and we get it but that’s a cost of doing business. Living on this lake is a cost, part of that is a cost of doing business. Fix your shore. Spend a couple bucks and get it done. And finally we’ve become in my mind, and I’ve heard this from other people, we’ve become whiney elitists on this lake. Okay. People say it. In fact someone stole the sign. My gut check is someone off the lake stole it and said you whiney rich people. You’re not going to tell me what to do on a public lake so we’re getting this, the main reason I’m here is an apology to you 5 and it’s not everybody and the badgering and the harassment it really got to me when I kept watching that especially, there was even so far as to accuse the mayor of bias. Like an open secret for you people that don’t agree with you they know your integrity. That shouldn’t even be close to be questioned. I’ll close that with an apology and that’s all I have. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Mr. Page. We don’t have any more scheduled visitor presentations but certainly welcome anyone else to step forward. Larry Koch: Mayor, council members. Thank you. My name’s Larry Koch. I live at 471 Bighorn Drive and I appreciate the opportunity to speak to you this evening. I came to speak basically because I want to deliver a copy of the email that I sent to all of you regarding the Mayor’s most recent visit to our property, which I appreciate very much. My wife appreciates it very much. Again we appreciate basically the visit by Mr. Campion and Mr. McDonald and I know that Ms. Coleman has offered to come to our property. We’re just trying to arrange a mutually convenient time. We all have busy schedules and I appreciate that and I extend the invitation to Ms. Tjornhom also to join us. I apologize for the mispronunciation. I didn’t mean to get on Mr. Page about my number but he’s known me for a little while. About my name, excuse me. He’s known me for a little while. As I mentioned to the mayor the problem that we have now is that we have high water. Very high water compared to normal. We’re way over what the average is right now and unfortunately we have a situation where these particular boats, and it’s not necessarily the boats but the operation of these boats that create these incredibly large wakes that end up crashing into the shore. Much larger, 2 ½ times larger than the wake created by a normal boat cruising on Lotus Lake and that’s really the issue and these wake boats are a recent phenomena. And so I’ve asked the mayor that we look into this issue to prevent the damage. We have significant damage. The mayor, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Campion have all seen that damage. The damage around the lake. We took Mr. McDonald around the lake and showed him the various locations of the damage so they’re causing damage to this lake. Damage that isn’t caused by Mother Nature. Mother Nature blows the leaves. I’m sorry and if this was a cause, if these problems were caused by Mother Nature I would say you know maybe there’s something to people being, you know having to take action to protect it but this is not the case of Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 8 Mother Nature. This is the case of people purposely operating boats that they know or should know cause significant damage to our shoreline. And unfortunately Mother Nature gave us a very small and narrow lake and that’s something that we are saddled with. But I tell you I take offense at this blame the victim attitude that people have. This is no different than saying the person who got killed on a highway because of a drunk driver shouldn’t have been on the highway. That’s exactly what it is. You’re blaming the people who have been there for 30 or more years okay because their shoreline is being damaged by other people purposely operating boats to do that. This is not a fair comparison. And I’m pretty sure that on the agenda there’s at least a discussion about putting together a process to talk about this issue and I don’t know the process so that’s one of the reasons I’m talking right now. And unfortunately I’m not going to be here on the day of the open house so I’d like you to consider to changing that to 2 days earlier because I think it’s important to get everybody to participate and I think it’s a good process but I don’t know that there’s a process necessary right now because we know that these lakeshore are being damaged today. The elevation of Lotus Lake today I believe is 1 inch lower than the ordinary high water mark. No excuse me, it’s 1 inch lower than 6 inches lower than the high water mark but my point is this. At this point wake surf, wake by surf boats are going to go at least 6 inches over the top of those, of our shoreline. That’s going onto my property okay, and every other owner of lake around it and it’s eroding it. And so we need to take action to stop this and as I said before especially in these narrow areas, and I do have my picture but you probably remember. The narrow area in the middle of Lotus Lake and also at the north end. The north end the narrowest part is only 300 feet and the studies, pure reviewed scientific studies have shown okay that it takes a minimum of over 900 feet for the wakes created by these wake boats to dissipate. In other words not cause the damage. These are pure reviewed scientific studies. Indisputable. So I appreciate this process going through but I think today we should be, we should be imposing an emergency ordinance like I’ve asked before to stop the wake surfing okay in these narrow areas because those are the ones that are being damaged in particular. And my last comment has to do with Mr. Page’s reference to the survey. Now I can look at survey numbers and I can add like he did and I can make them look like well you know, nobody was, you know the small number was in favor or had a problem. Well if you do the right math the majority of the people who responded to the survey, for a majority had a problem in some degree with the wakes caused by these wake boats. And so before you go you know take Mr. Page’s remarks for face I’m happy to sit down as part of this process and we can do through the survey. We can go through the scientific studies and we can talk about these point by point so that, at the end of the day you make decisions based on science. Not conjecture. Not playing with numbers. Actually looking at the science. Looking at the facts and making logical decisions so I appreciate your time and again I don’t know the process when we get to talk about this, the process of looking at this issue but again I would appreciate it if we could revise that so I could be here. I’m going to be out of the country unfortunately and I can’t change those plans. So again I thank you very much and I have a copy of the letter and stuff. Should I give it to somebody now or later or? Mayor Ryan: Give it to Mr. Wedel please. Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 9 Larry Koch: Okay. Mayor Ryan: But we did receive your email as well just so you know. Larry Koch: I appreciate that thank you but I thought for the record I’d like to get these on the record. Mayor Ryan: Sure. Larry Koch: Thank you very much for your time. Mayor Ryan: Yeah thank you Mr. Koch. Larry Koch: And again we’ll arrange for a time and we’re happy to have you out as well. And I’m happy to have Mr. Page over and actually stand on my dock. Mark Page: I’ve seen it. Larry Koch: As the Mayor. Well you’ve never stood on my dock. So if you could come over and stand on my dock I’ll be more than happy to show you where it’s at and the other people on the lake that are suffering this. Mayor Ryan: Alright thank you. Larry Koch: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Is there anybody else for a visitor presentations? JoAnn Syverson: Hi, JoAnn Syverson, 489 Pleasant View Road. Member of the Big 3. What we’ve been doing here is not fun. I’ve loved being on the LLCA board. I loved it. I loved organizing the parties and getting to know everyone but when I saw the damage that wake surfing was doing I just couldn’t sit back anymore. I had to come forward. It’s been a lot of work. I worked for months on that deck that I presented and everything I said was backed up with scientific evidence about the damage and the dangers of these boats. So I know that you know I’ve been here a lot and I’m sorry, and I’m sorry to the Mayor too. I actually had nightmares about you. I’m sorry if I did anything to you know embarrass you and I just want you to know that whatever you think we’re doing it’s not fun and it’s a lot of work and we’re just standing up for what we believe in and what we know is right. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Mrs. Syverson. Anybody else that would like to come forward. Donna Burt: Good evening Donna Burt, 6645 Horseshoe Curve. I would like to respond to Mr. Page’s remarks about personal responsibility. We are prepared and have no problem spending Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 10 money in…this problem but the problem is not just my property. The problem is the lake and the water quality and the natural inhabitants of the lake and the ecology around the lake. It is not just about me and my home. We are more than fine to spend the money. We’ve already put down deposits. Unfortunately there’s another issue that we need to get a permit from the watershed so there’s very little we can do to protect ourselves. We may not be able to put riprap in. They don’t approve it anymore since 2016. We have to be in a 3 to 1 ratio for it to even be effective. We also already had riprap which has been compromised and destroyed by the wakes so there’s a question of do you just go do the same thing and have it fall down again. It’s not holding up to the high water and the wakes. Now there’s the issue of the sewer line that runs across our property and a tree that’s about to fall in so this is going to be a problem for everyone that lives on that lake when the raw sewage is in the lake. This is not just about our property. My house. This is a lake wide issue. This is an issue for anyone that uses that lake. And the water quality and the safety and health of the water. So I personally don’t even go in the water anymore it’s so disgusting and I’ve heard a lot of people remark about that. That the water quality is so poor they don’t even want to go in. So from the boat, do you see that or do you have to stand on the shore and see it? You’ve all been invited out. We’ve only had Mr. McDonald come out but it is, all you have to do is look at it and there are others. Not just 3. I personally didn’t even participate in the survey. I didn’t even know there was an LLCA so I was not part of the survey and I can only imagine there’s just as many people that also were not part of it and a lot of people that would be concerned about what is happening to this lake. That’s all, thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Ms. Burt. Steve Corkery: Hello my name is Steve Corkery. I live at 40 Twin Maple Lane. I live as part of an association that’s on Lotus Lake. I’ve been on and around Lotus Lake for probably the last 15 or 20 years. The water quality has never been great on Lotus Lake. That pre-dates wake surfing. It pre-dates most water activities that people are doing now. I think if we need to look at the water quality we have an issue with just the soil content of the lake but as well as the runoff that’s going into the lake. That’s not on surf boats. I look at the lake on a busy day and I see a lot of families out taking part in wake surfing or other lake activities. It’s a public lake. I see 3 people who are very passionate about this issue. The reality is they’re not interested in compromise. I think both sides have you know, those who are in favor of wake surfing have tried to say let’s work together. Let’s look at new signs, regulations. They’re not interested. They’re out videotaping people on their dock. Children who are, you know families who are going by on a surf boat and an individual’s out there videotaping them. That’s not okay to be videotaping families or young kids out on their boats and I think, I don’t think they’re ever going to be happy and I think they keep coming to the City Council and I look at we got a notice today, or to come to the meeting to talk about the quality of our city streets. I don’t know about most people but our’s looks like the surface of the moon. Those are the issues the City Council should be working on. Dealing with streets, you know fire, police those type of services. This issue affects a fraction of the city of Chanhassen residents and here we’re spending hours and hours and people keep coming back to the City Council meeting. I’d ask you to say, part of it we all Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 11 have to be adults. We have to respect each other. If people are concerned about the lakes we need to be cognizant and not be surfing close to other boats or up close to properties. Stay in the middle of the lake but at some point we have to focus on big issues that affect the entire city like roads. Like our public services and not get hung up on this issue that affects a really small segment of the population. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Anybody else like to come forward? Okay well I’m just going to make a couple comments and then of course if council wants to make additional comments I as always welcome those. You know I want to extend appreciation for the, you know the residents that live on Lotus that have invited and had council members out to their house. We do appreciate you taking the time to share your views and your concerns from your property so I just want to acknowledge that. I know many of us have been able to do that. Second of all I know Mrs. Koch you asked at the last meeting about a time line. We did put it in as a follow up at the, as we do all of our visitor request forms as part of our correspondence discussion but I don’t know if we have it available to, is it all ready? Now this is a time line specifically to address what the high water, high water level should be established at. We talk a lot about process and what’s that process. Well okay well there’s a process but what’s the time line? So in, to be very clear this is a process and this is the time line that we are going to be following for addressing the high water mark as it relates to Lotus Lake. We are starting, you know we’ve started the process and you can obviously read how that, how we proceed through that. Mr. Koch was this the public open house you were referencing? Larry Koch: Yes. Mayor Ryan: Yes okay. Larry Koch: Yes it was. Mayor Ryan: Okay. We’ll evaluate that. You know obviously I’m not going to make any commitments to changing schedules because this is one that we had laid out for reasons. If Jason wants to, or Mr. Wedel wants to address it he may. You know I don’t know how strict the time line is or this is just generally speaking. Jason Wedel: Mayor, members of the council. This was my first draft of putting a schedule together so if council’s in favor of tweaking that date I think we can accommodate that if need be. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Well we’ll look at our, I appreciate you saying that. We’ll look at the you know our schedule as it relates to our, the remainder of our year with meetings but we will keep that in mind. So that’s one time line. The other thing that I would like to address is, or actually ask a favor. I don’t know Mr. Wedel if you have been out but if somebody from the City could go to Ms. Burt’s house to look at the tree and the raw sewage line I think we should have somebody from the City go look at that. If it’s nearing collapse I’d like to get somebody from Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 12 the City to evaluate that please. And then last but not least you know as I’ve said and I expressed this to some of the residents that I’ve been in touch with, you know we’re dealing with a couple different issues here. The first one and the way this all came about was addressing the high water mark and this is the time line and this is the process that we’re going to follow with maybe some variation in dates but generally speaking this is the time line and process we’ll follow for evaluating the high water elevation. But as you can tell from the different meetings and discussions that we have that there’s a, you know a lot of other issues as it relates to this specific issue. So whether it’s boats. Areas on the lake they can go. Height of, you know height of the wave. The ecology of the lake. Buoys. Points. You know keeping distance from other boats. There’s a multitude of issues that have been brought forward and we need to take the time as a council and staff to evaluate all of those issues and so Mr. Gerhardt and I have been talking about putting together this fall some sort of a round table or a community meeting where we host it somewhere and the council at the Rec Center where it’s not a work session. It’s not a council meeting but we have an opportunity to take collectively feedback from all the residents for all of our lakes because as Mr. Corkery put out this is a big community. There are a lot of issues so this isn’t just isolated to Lake Minnewashta but we have other lakes that we need to make sure that we’re evaluating as a part of a bigger process or you know the ordinances around lakes so Mr. Gerhardt is going to be working on that. I don’t have specific dates, times but I just want you to know that that is the next step of this process so we are following the high water elevation process as laid out and we are working on doing something in the fall to address the myriad of issues as it affects all of our lakes in Chanhassen so we will be back in touch with you about that. As it relates to where we’re at with the water of Lotus Lake today, Mr. Wedel sent council an email that as of 1:30 today the elevation of Lotus Lake is 895.71 and the no wake elevation that the City Council approved earlier this year is 896.3 so we’re still below that. So you know we don’t as a city see the emergency in terms of the high water elevation but again I will withhold any further comments if council sees differently but I just wanted to share the current lake level that was last reported by Mr. Wedel. If council doesn’t have any additional comments then I just ask that you understand that this is the process that we’re going through. Ms. Burt if you’re open to having somebody from the City come out and look at your tree and your sewer then somebody from the City will be in touch with you and we will move forward collectively with that schedule. Council is there anything further? Okay. Thank you everyone for your feedback and thoughts as part of visitor presentations. FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE. Mayor Ryan: Next up we have the fire department and law enforcement update. Chief do you want to go first since you have cake to get to. Chief Don Johnson: Thank you Mayor and council. I’ll keep this brief so you can get on with your evening. This is our update for this month of August. Staffing stayed with 43. We’ve got 2 of our newest folks that started the academy August 13th. They’ll be done the end of December and fully firefighter trained. We had 102 calls in July which was significant for us. If you look back over our history we don’t normally run that much. We did start our day only response late Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 13 in the month so you’ll see we had 3 chief only 10 day only and 36 duty crew calls and only 53 of the 102 as all calls which starts to now ratchet down the load on folks that are just at home so it’s starting to pay off and you’ll see a significant change when I give my report next month. Out of those 102 calls we had 53 EMS with 8 motor vehicle accidents. One mutual aid response to Chaska and 4 citizen complaints resulting in 2 unauthorized burning incidents. Very quickly we had, we assisted with the Tour de Tonka. We had our annual fire department physicals and our annual SCBA maintenance which just about ends most of our NFP required certifications and compliance issues. We did visit 33 block parties as part of National Night Out and I assisted with the Hopkins police officer funeral for Brooklyn Park as part of the Minnesota Chief’s Association Assistance Group. We also had a kick off meeting and we’ll talk more about this as we get closer but Lieutenant Pearce, myself met with Westwood Church, Carver County Emergency Management and Ridgeview Ambulance to start the planning for a full functional exercise that will happen in May of 2020 which will involve all of those disciplines and this as a request from Westwood Church so I’ll be able to outline more of that and we’ll also be working with City and emergency operation center for that drill. It’s a good opportunity for us to work together on some things that are going on in the public so. With that I will just tell you that open house has been scheduled for October 7th from 6:00 to 8:00 and Fire Marshal Nutter is well in the planning phases for this year’s open house which will include the State Fire Marshal’s initiative on close the bedroom door we’ll have some live burn activities that we’ll outline why it’s important to keep your door closed at night. For that I can stand for questions. Mayor Ryan: Council any questions? Chief could you, I was going to highlight it at the end of the meeting but we approved a resolution as part of our consent agenda and I just, if you could, I know you want to get going but I would really like you to take a couple minutes to acknowledge the donation from CenterPoint Energy and then that we accepted earlier in the month and then just say what it’s going towards if you could. Chief Don Johnson: Alright Mayor. As a regular partner of the community the community partnership grant through CenterPoint Energy offers a significant amount of money each year. Since the program inception they’ve awarded $1.8 million dollars in donations and private funding to 967 projects in the communities throughout CenterPoint Energy. They usually come and deliver the check right to council but have since ended that so we did put that on the consent agenda tonight. The Fire Department applied for and was granted $2,500. We’re using that, it’s a matching grant so we’re using that towards the purchase of a new thermal imaging camera for Engine 1 due in later this fall. Mayor Ryan: And it was asked on Facebook what does a thermal imaging camera, how does it benefit the community? Chief Don Johnson: So from a community standpoint what it does is it benefits the firefighters in the fire department in the most intense parts of a structure fire. If we don’t know if that fire, if that residence is occupied we can quickly scan rooms because it differentiates temperature in the room so rather than going, it sees through smoke. Rather than going around on our hands and Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 14 knees trying to find people we can actually scan rooms quickly with a thermal imaging camera. The other opportunities instead of sometimes we have electrical issues in homes. We can actually see in walls and find hot spots versus the old way of doing things of taking an axe and opening up walls so I’d say from a community standpoint it’s a great benefit and a tool for us that is going to overlay into what we, how we provide services to the community. Mayor Ryan: Wonderful, thank you for the explanation so enjoy the retirement party. Chief Don Johnson: Thank you. And on my behalf I appreciate the council taking the time to honor our folks for that. I know it’s a busy night and we appreciate that and I know my people appreciate it as well so thank you for taking time out of the schedule to have that ceremony for us. Mayor Ryan: Thanks Chief. Chief Don Johnson: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Lieutenant. Welcome. Lt. Lance Pearce: He didn’t tell me there was cake. Mayor Ryan: Go ahead. Lt. Lance Pearce: Mayor, council, report for July. Total calls for service. We had 1,102 calls. 544 of those were non-criminal. We had a little over 500 were traffic related. Of the traffic related ones we had 349 traffic stops resulting in 2 DUI arrests and 44 citations issued. And the bulk of our calls for service last month were again non-criminal stuff and were dominated with alarms, medicals and suspicious activity calls. Just a note, I had a brief conversation on Night to Unite with the Mayor. Last month we only had one domestic assault arrest. Mayor Ryan: Great, thank you. Lt. Lance Pearce: Moving on with my report for the month. I want to thank council and department heads for participation in Night to Unite. That was fun to see all the department heads and all of my staff and most of the council members present so I appreciate the support and participation. A couple of community relations upcoming events. The Sheriff’s Citizens Academy for fall is starting September 19th. That’s advertised on the city website, the sheriff’s office website and also social media for both. It’s 10 weeks. Every Thursday night again starting on September 19th. We are taking applications so for residents of Chanhassen it’s highly recommended. I invite any of the City Council members, city staff, we’ve got nothing but positive feedback from others that have participated. Mayor Ryan: Great, thanks Lieutenant. Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 15 Lt. Lance Pearce: Any questions you can contact me since I’m coordinating it. In addition to that I’ve developed a Coffee with a Cop program. We’re going to start that and see how that takes off. It’s going to be October 2nd this year and we’ll be at Starbucks starting at 9:30 a.m. So you’ll see more of that advertised on social media here in the next week or two. Mayor Ryan: So it will just, somebody will be at Starbucks with an opportunity for anyone to come and have a conversation. Lt. Lance Pearce: Any questions. Comments. We’re available. Mayor Ryan: Wonderful. Fantastic. Lt. Lance Pearce: So and we’ll see but I think Sergeant Stahn will be there at Starbucks so with that that’s my report. I stand for any questions. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Lieutenant. Council any questions? You weren’t at the obviously the last meeting. I know you do your reports at the end of the month but we wanted to extend our appreciation for the sheriff’s office for Night to Unite so appreciate you being out in the community and talking to the residents. Had extended our appreciation to the Chief as well but thank you and I enjoyed spending the evening and heard great things about how cool your car was so. Lt. Lance Pearce: Thank you. And they didn’t take it. Mayor Ryan: Right, they tried. Lt. Lance Pearce: Thank you very much. Mayor Ryan: Alright, thank you Lieutenant. PUBLIC FEEDBACK ON PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT FUNDING. Mayor Ryan: Alright new business. Thank you everybody for being here tonight and your patience as we work through our agenda with a number of different topics but tonight we are here to take public feedback on the pavement management funding so tonight we are holding a public comment session regarding a proposed funding scenario for our pavement management fund. We are looking for your feedback as it relates to this topic. The council will not be voting tonight nor will we as a council be discussing this topic. We are here to listen to you, the residents as part of our decision making process. The council has been discussing pavement management funding at our work sessions throughout this past year and as many of you recall it was a topic considered last year as well. With staff we have reviewed a multitude of scenarios and various options that could be considered when we look at addressing the needs of our Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 16 funding for our roads. Tonight you will hear from both our Director of Finance as well as our Public Works Director on the history, the need and proposed funding scenario that council is considering. Once the presentation is completed I will open up the meeting for public comment. At that time I ask you to come forward. State your name and your address for the record and then proceed with your comments. I do ask that you limit your time to around 5 minutes. This truly is an opportunity for us as council and staff to hear from you. If you have specific questions when you approach council I will ask the appropriate staff member to answer if they are able. While all of this discussion is obviously recorded as all of our meetings are for public record I have asked that staff compiles a list of questions asked tonight with a corresponding city response so by the end of the week we are able to publish a Q and A document for the public to reference following this listening session so if there’s any follow up or further questions that will be part of the document. With that Mr. Sticha if you want to take it from here. Or Mr. Wedel, I’m not sure who’s going first. Greg Sticha: Yeah before Jason starts I just want to let the audience know there is copies of the power point on the table over here so if you want to follow along with the hard copy you can. There’s also a copy of the attachments on the table over here so you might want to grab a copy of that. Jason Wedel: Mayor, members of the council, members of the audience, thank you for being here this evening. I will kick things off. I’m going to start with some of the information that was discussed previously including last year’s presentation and this is a little bit of background on how we rate our streets. Every year we rate one third of our total miles of our street and they are ranked on a scale from 0 to 100. That’s what we call our Overall Condition Index and so the table that’s on this first slide shows you how the average OCI has looked from 2010 to our current year. It started off in the high 70’s. It’s gone down. It’s come up a little bit with some projects but right now we’re averaging close to right around a 70. So what does a 70 mean? A 70 means we are in fair condition if you look on this table being in that 50 to 74 range. That means a street in that condition would be due for what we call a mill and overlay where you mill off the top 2 inches of pavement and repave it. If you’re at the high category starting at the top in that 95 to 100 you’re in great shape. You don’t need to do anything. Going down the scale as you get into the 85 to 94 range you’re looking at doing like a sealcoat or a chip seal. And then as you get further down into the 70’s and 50’s that’s where we start looking at doing the mill and overlays where you’re milling off the top surface and paving on a new surface. Once you get below that the streets have degraded to a point where milling and overlaying is not an option anymore. The streets have fallen apart too much and that’s when you start talking about a total reconstruction of the street. So if you look at our total street system today as in 2019 we have 24 miles of streets that in that poor category. That’s 0 to 49. 27 miles that are in the fair, in that 50 to 75 ranking. 18 miles that are satisfactory and 46 miles that are good so our total miles of street are 115 miles. So this map is just kind of a shot of the streets and where you see red those are the streets that are in the worst condition. They are scattered throughout the city. They’re not in any one specific area. They are spread throughout the entire city so part of what we do when we put street improvement projects together every year is we try to keep our projects Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 17 clustered in one particular area and try to take care of a specific neighborhood all at once rather than doing a block of street here and a block of street there. It’s not cost effective to have contractors zig zagging all over town so we do try to target specific neighborhoods so their rankings may vary a little bit but when we get into the capital improvement planning that’s what we’re looking for. So this is really some new information that was not presented last year and this is what we’ve been using as a basis to come up with a budget for what we should be doing for our street replacement. This graph, the blue line shows you basically the history of our street system. It starts in 1960 and goes to today and it’s showing you on those lines is how many miles of street we were adding per year during those time periods. So if you look from 1960 to 1970 we were adding on average a half of mile of new street per year. Typically through new development. And then as you get into the 70’s development, more development started occurring in Chanhassen. We were adding streets at 2.7 miles per year. In the 80’s we were at 2.5 miles per year. In the 90’s was really the boom time. We were adding 3 ½ miles of streets every single year. And then the recession came and in 2000 things slowed down and we were adding a mile and a half per year. And then basically 2010 through today it’s been about a half a mile per year. And I point that out because your average street will last about 50 years so if you look at today’s date being 2019 and you go backwards 50 years how many miles of street were we adding at that timeframe and that’s where that little red arrow is at the bottom of this graph shows you we’re really at that transition point of going from 0.5 miles per year to 2.7 miles per year. So the point in all this is if we’re not replacing streets that are in that timeframe at the same rate they were being added we’re falling behind every year. So being that we’re in that transition point of 0.5 to 2.7 we’ve used an average and just called it 1.6 miles per year because we’re right kind of at that hinge point. So if you look at 1.6 miles per year and it costs on average one and a half million dollars per mile to do our streets we need $2.4 million dollars per year to keep up with our street system. So that’s for street reconstruction. Same exact concept is when we look at our mill and overlays and again milling and overlaying is where you grind off that top inch or two and then repave a new surface on top of it. Streets that are about 20-25 years old are about, that’s when they’re due to get the mill and overlay. If you wait too much longer they’re going to deteriorate beyond a point where you can do a mill and overlay so same exact exercise. Look at when our streets were added. Go back 20 years and were are we at? Well again we’re at that red arrow is at on this illustration, we’re right at actually our peak time in development. We’re at 3 ½ miles of street per year so again if we’re not milling and overlaying 3 ½ miles of street per year we’re falling behind. So the average cost to mill and overlay a street is $350,000 per mile times 3 ½ miles so we should be spending on average $1.2 million per year on mill and overlays. So if you combine our street reconstruction of $2.4 million per year plus our mill and overlay of $1.2 million per year that gives us our total annual budget of $3.6 million dollars for streets. And that ends my part of the presentation so if anyone has any questions on what I’ve said to date or so far. Mayor Ryan: Well just continue unless council has some specific questions for Jason. Okay. Go ahead Mr. Sticha. Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 18 Greg Sticha: Okay. I’m going to pick up on so how do we pay for this $3.6 million because that’s the big question probably a lot of people have. First I kind of want to go over some of the things that the City Council has kind of already discussed or established as part of this process, and we’ve been talking about this now for 2 years so this City Council and previous City Council has spent a lot of time and effort into researching this so I want to make sure that we’re clear on the proposal, the potential proposal that’s in front of you so we clearly understand how it would work if that proposal would go through. First of all the City Council has made it relatively clear that they’re going to continue it’s current assessment practice. The practice of assessing 40 percent to the benefitting properties will continue and I think the council made that pretty clear to us this past year and into this year so there really isn’t a big point of discussing well I had to pay an assessment. Why don’t the new people have to pay an assessment based on what the City Council has given us in direction going forward all people will pay this same amount for the assessment. The additional funding that is needed here is for the City share so if you look at item number one, the benefitting property owners are responsible for 40 percent while the City’s responsible for 60 percent. And to this point in time the only revenue stream that’s been established to pay for our 60 percent, so if you take 60 percent of $3.6 million obviously that’s you know a couple million dollars and to this point in time the only dedicated revenue stream that the City has put towards funding for roads is a levy of about $380,000. Far below of what is needed for the City share only. Any franchise fee or levy will be issued only for local road improvements. The council has been very clear to staff on that as well. They want the funding that is raised from either a franchise fee or this property tax levy to go for the local road improvements only. And the last bullet point I talk about is issuing a franchise fee I think we’ve made clear in previous presentations but I want to do that again this evening, we clearly understand that issuing a franchise fee has the exact same impact as a property tax. However the one thing, or a couple of things about a franchise fee that allows the City Council to do is have a little more flexibility in who pays what and what customers are charged. Whereas issuing a property tax levy will result in residential properties picking up 83 percent of the tab. Period. And that’s based on the City’s property tax market value across the entire city. 83 percent of all taxable market value in the city is residential properties. So what is a franchise fee? And we did discuss this last year but I’m going to take the time for those that weren’t able to attend one of the meetings last year to kind of go over what is exactly a franchise fee and some of the regulations behind it. The City, all cities have a statutory authority to have franchise agreements which each of the utility companies, gas and electric for maintaining the city owned right-of- way. It’s within state statute for the establishment of this franchise fee. Within those franchises, franchise ordinances, within those agreements cities may charge the utility companies a fee for the use of the right-of-way to be used for whatever purpose the City would deem necessary. To this point in time the City of Chanhassen has not done so. A number of, all of local communities in the Twin Cities have already implemented a franchise fee including all of our neighbors who all have franchise fees. Each of them using it for different sources but by far the largest use for franchise fees across the Twin Cities is for local roads. Per Statute 216B.36 the language for inclusion on the utility bill is franchise fee. Under statute you are not allowed to call it anything other than that on the utility bill unless we were to go through a legal process with the Public Utilities Commission and that would prove to be costly and most likely ineffective. Under Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 19 216B.03 of the State Statute that the utility companies are not allowed to charge different rates within billing classes. All residential customers, single family homes, townhouses and apartments are required to be treated the same under this statute. You’re not allowed within the franchise fee to charge a class within their billing structure differently than any other property within that class. The agreement ordinance that we have begun work on with the utility companies for a term of 20 years. Any future City Council could modify the franchise fee ordinance. The franchise fee ordinance portion of this agreement. Just the same as any future city council could modify any property tax levy. There’s really no difference in protecting the levy or a franchise fee from future city councils making a change of course or direction. So we looked at a number of scenarios over the past year but we put one together for this evening’s presentation as something that the council might likely consider going forward to fund the $3.6 million that Mr. Wedel mentioned earlier. And part of this funding scenario is a franchise fee. Under this scenario a $5 residential franchise fee per utility would be charged for residential customers. There would be a sliding scale for commercial customers and I’ll show you the scale here momentarily but this franchise fee would generate about $1.7 million per year in revenues for local roads. This proposal also includes an increase in the 2021 levy. Not next year’s levy but the year after next year of about $330,000 or 3 percent of the total levy that the City of Chanhassen has. And in addition this scenario also includes the use of the library levy which will no longer be needed to pay the debt of the library building starting in 2022. Using $260,000 of that debt levy coming off the books towards roads. That particular use would not have an impact on property tax owners as it’s just a levy being replaced with a different levy so that would not have an impact on your property tax statement. So why a franchise fee versus a property tax? As I mentioned earlier a franchise fee offers the City Council a little more flexibility in what property owners are charged. They are able to between different classes charge different rates for the said franchise fees, in particular one of the goals of previous City Councils was to attempt to adjust the total funding paid for less heavy on the residential portion and more so on the commercial property owners. A franchise fee allows that to happen. If the City Council were to issue solely a property tax for the entire amount to fund the $3.6 million, 83 cents of every dollar would be paid for by a home, apartment or townhouse in the city of Chanhassen. Whereas by using a franchise fee that would shift the balance paid closer to about a 60/40 split between residential property owners and other commercial property owners. The other thing a franchise fee allows for is the collection of a fee for those property owners that do not pay property taxes. Non profits and other properties which are using the city streets under an exempt property tax situation. They are not paying property taxes and a franchise fee would allow to collect a revenue stream from those property owners. So based on the 1.73 that I discussed two slides ago this is an example of a proposed franchise fee schedule. This mirrors exactly what the City Council had considered in November of last year. The amounts per class had not changed so the total revenue generated from this particular structure would be just over $1.7 million dollars per year. And you can see which of the classes of the $1.7 how much they’d be paying in each class. So taking a look at under this proposal what would be the total impact to a property owner in the city of Chanhassen? My dollar numbers are a little off there on the far right. I apologize for that. The franchise fee for all homes would be the same. $5 per utility per month which is $10 a month in almost a majority of cases in the city of Chanhassen assuming Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 20 you have a gas and electric utility in your home. $120 a year. The additional property tax levy increase of the $330,000 that I had mentioned three previous slides ago would cost the homes listed on the far left the estimated amounts in the middle column. So a $200,000 home would pay $13 on that $330,000 levy and a one million dollar home would pay $82 on that $330,000 levy. Total per year, numbers are on the right. Just obviously adding the left two columns. So this is a very detailed spreadsheet that we’ve been tracking for, ever since the establishment of our revolving assessment construction fund or pavement management construction fund and this is the current scenario that it’s in. And as you can see at the bottom of 2021 the fund will be out of money. There will no longer be any amount of funds to fund the city share of the improvements. You would be able to fund a project in 2021 of $2.2 million and then no project in 2022 and then by 2023 even, you couldn’t even afford the $2.2 million. So our current estimates have this fund being out of available resources and it is for the city portion of this equation. All of the repaid assessments are put back into this fund so as each property owner is paying their assessment all of those funds plus any interest that is earned on them are going right back into this fund which helps keep the fund alive even longer. So based on the scenario that I previously presented and if you look at the top of 2021 achieving funding of $3.6 million, which Mr. Wedel mentioned earlier this evening and with a 3 percent increase projected for increase in construction costs starting in 2022 and years thereafter, under the funding scenario of the $5 dollar franchise fee, maintaining the current levy of the $380,000 that is already being put towards roads plus the $330,000 levy increase in 2021 plus the $260,000 of levy that will become available in 2022 from the library would keep this fund funded well beyond the next 10 years. Now one thing I’d like to point out at the very bottom of this spreadsheet, the fund balances are not immense from year to year and typically in funding these large projects you probably don’t want to have a fund balance much less than a half a million dollars too frequently as for me to go to Jason and say you need to fund exactly $3.6 million in road projects in one year is probably not likely. Some years he might try to fund $3.9. Other years it might be $3.4 but in general with the average being $3.6 the fund should maintain just enough reserves to fluctuate the total cost of each project each year going forward. And that’s all I have in terms of the financing portion of this equation. Again this was based on one scenario that the council had asked staff to put together and we did for the City Council so I certainly would take any questions on this particular scenario or about a franchise fee or any of the other slides that I just finished presenting. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Mr. Sticha. Council I know we’ve seen this, talked through the presentation and the numbers that Mr. Sticha had presented as well as the information Mr. Wedel had presented but I, before I open it up to the public for comments are there any questions that you would like to ask before opening up the public comments? No. Okay so again for, thank you for the presentation. So those here in chambers again I just want to remind you of if you could keep it to around 5 minutes and just step forward. State your name and your address for the record and then you can make a comment on what you have seen tonight or if you have questions as it relates to what was presented tonight, both Mr. Wedel and Mr. Sticha will do their best to ask so if anybody would like to be first one up please go ahead. Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 21 Mack Titus: Mack Titus, 2747 Century Trail. You’re talking just public roads or public and private roads? Greg Sticha: This is public roads only. Funding for public roads. City roads. Mack Titus: And how many miles of each are there? Within Chanhassen. Jason Wedel: We have 115 miles of public streets. I don’t have a listing of how many miles of private streets. That would be something I would have to research. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Mack Titus: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Mr. Titus. Craig Mertz: Craig Mertz. I tried to…a Chanhassen resident in Chanhassen 46 years. I can probably beat anybody in the room on that. I think that the engineering staff and the regular city staff has done a wonderful job on coming up with a solution for a very difficult problem and I urge the City to look at the City Engineer’s work as the best solution that is available to the City on this and I urge approval of the proposed franchise fee. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Mr. Mertz. Hello sir. Jay Schreur: Hi, my name is Jay Schreur. I live at 8376 Suffolk Drive in Chanhassen. Mayor Ryan: Would you mind spelling your last name. Jay Schreur: S-c-h-r-e-u-r. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Jay Schreur: It’s like Elsie. Mayor Ryan: You get it. See, did you see how quickly responded? Jay Schreur: Right. I have a handout here I’d like to give to you guys and pass it around. You can keep going around the room. I’ve been trying to, I kind of represent the 3 townhouse neighborhoods on Powers Boulevard and I’ve been trying to kind of take the role of a peace maker I guess on this here because there’s a lot of people that are concerned. A lot of people that are unhappy and a lot of people that are downright angry about this and I think a couple of them, of the points, one of them is what Greg brought up here earlier is that the franchise fee is for city owned streets and myself and most all these people I think live on privates streets. Private Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 22 maintained streets so we maintain them through our association fees and they consider it a double taxation. They’re also concerned that, or not concerned but they’re angry about calling this a franchise fee because a franchise fee is for city owned streets so they would like to make the proposal or have something for you guys to think about, either exempt us from it, which I don’t know if you can or maintain the streets. One of the two. Make them city owned streets and maintain the streets. On this handout you have there’s Minutes that the City Council brought up last year so I took these and with the help of my staff, which is my wife, we went through these so I think these are very accurate and it gives a good scenario of how the people really feel about this franchise fee. What they would like and I know it’s impossible to do is to have the tax and call it a tax and have it a franchise fee but you can’t do that. I understand that so but they just want something that’s fair and equitable and treats all residents the same and not get double taxed on private and city owned streets. That’s the big concern of them and I think, I think if you can’t make them exempt and it talks about it here in the back part of it I think, and also they’re not happy that it’s on your utility bills. They would much rather pay it annually or whatever but that’s just the scenario. The feelings of the people. That’s all I’m giving to you is the feelings of the people. Mayor Ryan: Perfect, thank you. Jay Schreur: And there’s probably, I guess there’s, I don’t know there’s 75, 100, probably 500 people living there, right in that little area there so I encourage you to read this. Think about it and digest it a little bit before you do things. Mayor Ryan: Great. Jay Schreur: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you for that presentation and we will, thank you for the handout as well. We will do our best to address this as part of the Q and A as well. Jay Schreur: Yes please. Mayor Ryan: Okay thank you. Anybody else want to step forward? Carla Thompson: I’m Carla Thompson, 8524 Mayfield Court, Mission Hills Townhomes. We just paid for our streets and we just had them all redone and I’m suggesting that if the City wants to charge us this franchise fee then they should take over our roads and we’ve been told that oh our streets are so narrow. Well we don’t park on the sides of our streets at all so it isn’t any narrower than any other street. We just feel like this is just, if you can’t prorate us and according to this it sounds like the utilities can’t prorate. Mayor Ryan: Correct. Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 23 Carla Thompson: According to a statue or whatever, from what I read, but some consideration. Otherwise take over our roads. And that’s the way our other homeowners are feeling too so. I am President of the Association so I’m here to represent them. Mayor Ryan: Wonderful, thank you for coming tonight. We appreciate it. Hello sir. Ray Murray: Hi Mayor and City Council. Ray Murray. I live at 6618 Brenden Court and it looks likes according to the map that I…on the website and it looks like Brenden Court is one of those that is poor condition and it is probably due to a lot of traffic, junior highers being dropped off at the junior high school. Our cul-de-sac backs up to that. There’s a walkway from the cul- de-sac to the school and I appreciate, first of all I want to thank the City. Last year when I made the comments, about a week or two later the City put up no parking signs so I appreciate that but the people are still driving through dropping the kids off so the bottom line of it is we are, of all the roads that need repair and it’s not caused by the residents so I just want you to consider that too. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Appreciate it. Anybody else that would like to speak. Go ahead. Lucas Souza: Hi. Mayor Ryan: I could see the debate in your head. Lucas Souza: Yeah I want to come here today. My name is Lucas Souza. I live in 8091 Hidden Court, Chanhassen. 55317. By my accent you know probably, you can guess I am not born and raised in Minnesota. I have been here living in Chanhassen for 7 years and I want to just express my appreciation in how is a different vision for someone from outside of not being born and raised in Minnesota and Chanhassen. Just see how things work and today my first session that I come here to of the hearing section and because I was talking to my wife saying how does the roads and streets are being repaved and everything. She said I don’t know so a few days later I got the flyer at home and said see, that’s my answer. So I came here because that’s my answer so I like to find out so I learn a lot today and I understand because I lived in Shakopee before and the streets there were well maintained but it was an association and that’s was private owned street so there’s a difference now I just learned and I cannot blame you. My street is not that well maintained as it used to be in Shakopee. The one I was living and paying for. Coming from a different background and when I see things as little kids as 12 years old and they’ll be volunteering, that’s so inspiring because that’s how we raise citizens you know. That’s how we know the community is going to work. How you volunteer your time. How you care about others. That’s how you become a citizen. Even he was very inspiring beautiful to see kids this evening here being honored. I was, it’s beautiful. Such as the firefighters. They volunteer their time. They work hard and just call 911. They are there for you. Where I came from there is not that thing such a thing. I was telling my wife simple things like library. …people don’t have access to have a book. In some certain cultures there is a classmate I had in college here, she came from an Africa country. She said there she’s not even allowed to read books. And here Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 24 she was amazed how you can have a book and share. Return. Get as many as you want. And then I realize sometimes people take for granted things. They don’t appreciate what they have. They don’t know that bye kids. They’ve got backpack and go to school. They are safe. They go to school. Come back. It’s wonderful. It comes from our tax. We pay tax for that. It’s a well being of community so sometimes we don’t know how things are built. How things are made. How things work and then that comes from the tax we pay for. I know it’s sometimes hard for us to pay $5 dollars. $10 dollars more but for a public street that you drive on or your neighbor drive or your co-worker or your son-in-law, someone’s driving that road. If you think that because my road’s only my road that’s being a little more narrow vision of the well being of the city. Everything so all I just be my point of view. Appreciation of what I have here. What I drive on. What I visit the books I read that you guys did before I came so thank you so much for everything you guys have done. Thank you for all of you guys. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. I appreciate it. That’s nice. Thank you very much. Anybody else that would like to come forward still? Alright. You summarized things so nicely as what was being said so thank you everybody for your comment. Oh sir. Audience: No. To thank you. Mayor Ryan: Here, here. So do we want to talk a little bit about schedule or timeline of this discussion? Do we have one established? Greg Sticha: We do. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Greg Sticha: So if the City Council wants to proceed with a franchise fee it would take about a couple months to finalize the franchise ordinances and agreements that we’ve already kind of negotiated with the utility companies last fall. We need to look at those one more time and make sure that we’re not missing anything so we need a few weeks to finish up those agreements. We would then need to publish notice to hold a public hearing on approving the franchise ordinances. Again that’s for the agreements with the utility companies plus an ordinance for the franchise fee so we’d probably be looking the soonest of holding a public hearing probably early October, maybe the second meeting in October. Sometime in October most likely. And then at that meeting you would hold a public hearing. You could approve the agreements that evening or you could decide to approve the agreements at a following meeting. Mayor Ryan: Okay perfect. If we do move forward with the October public hearing or whatever time frame it is could we again make sure that we, as you I think all heard how many people got the flyers in the mail or in the Villager and I think that’s so important to do so if we could do that again I think that is well served. But thank you for the timeline, I appreciate that and I would again like to extend my appreciation or on behalf of council our appreciation for not only those that came to speak but those that are attending and just listening to understand the information Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 25 that is presented. I know it’s obviously a big decision for council that we have to make but to be able to know that the residents are paying attention and listening and I know we’ll receive emails from those that may be at home or watch this video later but getting the public comment and feedback prior to ever making a vote is something that’s very important to our process so I just want to extend our appreciation for your involvement as we work through this process. I just want to acknowledge your participation this evening so thank you very much. Is there anything further? Go ahead. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council members, I think Greg did a good job of summarizing if the council wants to go ahead with, I’m not going to call it a franchise fee or franchise tax. And but I think direction from the mayor and the rest of the council was to summarize the questions that came before you tonight. That we would bring that back and make a presentation to you and then give our thoughts on those questions and any legal support that we need to answer any of those. Bring that back to you and then have a discussion amongst the council to give staff direction after that. Not to give everybody the thought that we’re going to leave this room tonight that it’s you know it’s automatically done. Mayor Ryan: Correct. Todd Gerhardt: You know I think the council was very clear to us that they want to discuss the questions that were brought up. Address the questions that were brought up and then have an open discussion amongst yourselves and give staff direction from there. Mayor Ryan: And so that would take place at a work session in September. Todd Gerhardt: Yes. And I think the direction tonight was to get these questions out on the website and allow other people to add other questions to that list and then bring it back probably second meeting in September for those additional questions that we might get but so the public can see the questions that were brought up tonight. Mayor Ryan: Perfect and Mr. Sticha is the link still available for people online to review the presentation and make comments? Greg Sticha: Yes and I’ll make sure that the, it’s also on the banner on the website. I’ll make sure it had been staff include, keeps it up on the banner for the time being. Mayor Ryan: Perfect so we’ll take the questions from tonight. If there are additional follow up questions that people here may have or people at home or watching online, if they have those please send them to either city staff or council. We’ll forward those on and make sure those are a part of our Q and A list for discussion. Council anything further as it relates to this? Okay, thank you. Thank you Mr. Gerhardt. Todd Gerhardt: Yep. Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 26 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS. Mayor Ryan: Mr. Gerhardt are you? Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council members. In January of every year the City Council develops it’s goals, what we call our key financial strategies and as a part of those a majority of the City Council wanted to see an Economic Development Commission established and so as a part of that the council developed bylaws for the Economic Development Commission. Some marching orders of what the commission’s goals and responsibilities would be and then we advertised for those commissions in the last month and the last two meetings that we held at the work session you interviewed candidates wanting to serve on the Economic Development Commission. Before you tonight is to make a recommendation for a 5 member Economic Development Commission. Two of those people serving 3 year terms and three of them serving 2 year terms and staff would look to direction from the mayor and the council on who you’d like to see serve on those different terms. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Mr. Gerhardt. There is a proposed motion in front of us if anybody would like to make a motion. Councilman Campion: I will make a motion. Mayor Ryan: Councilman Campion. Councilman Campion: This was based on discussion at our work session earlier, I propose the City Council appoints the following commissioners to the Economic Development Commission: Steven Stamy and Anne Heinze for 3 year terms ending March 31, 2022; and Kathy Donovan, James Sanford, and James Ebeling for 2 year terms ending March 31, 2021. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Coleman: Second it. Mayor Ryan: With a valid motion and a second, all those in favor please signify by saying aye. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to make the following appointments to the Economic Development Commission: Steven Stamy and Anne Heinze for 3 year terms ending March 31, 2022; and Kathy Donovan, James Sanford, and James Ebeling for 2 year terms ending March 31, 2021. All voted in favor, except Councilman McDonald and Councilwoman Tjornhom who opposed. The motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Chanhassen City Council – August 21, 2019 27 Mayor Ryan: Next do we have any commission presentations? I would just like to highlight real quickly again, we didn’t pull it off the agenda but want to recognize the donation from Love Inc. for donations to the senior center Maple Room which is going to be turned into a Memory Café. They are going under getting new furniture. It’s going to be a place for seniors to gather. Have meetings and just spend some time on comfortable furniture and so we really appreciate the donations and the support from Love Inc. to make this space available for the seniors in our community so I just want to acknowledge them and say thank you to that. Any administrative presentations? ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, City Council members. Just to follow up on the Economic Development Commission. We will send letters to those that were not appointed and we will send letters to those congratulating them on being appointed and explain what their terms are and they’ll come under the Mayor’s signature so everybody will be aware of your actions tonight. And that’s all I have. Mayor Ryan: Wonderful, thank you. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated July 16, 2019 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.2. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Planning Commission minutes dated July 16, 2019.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JULY 16, 2019 Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Randall, Michael McGonagill, Doug Reeder, and Laura Skistad MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad and John Tietz STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; MacKenzie Walters, Associated Planner; Jason Wedel, City Engineer/Public Works Director; and Chief Don Johnson, Fire Chief PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR AN XCEL ENERGY METER READER POLE LOCATED AT 2150 LYMAN BOULEVARD. Sharmeen Al-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Chris Rogers, Principal Land Rights Agent with Xcel Energy and Chris Sarles, explained the technical aspects of the need for this pole and associated equipment. Commissioner McGonagill asked for clarification on how the system will operate. Commissioner Skistad asked about costs to customers and radiation output. Chairman Weick opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. McGonagill moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan to allow a 145 foot pole with a 5 foot lightning rod for the Utility Meter Reader subject to the following conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Site Plan Review The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Site Plan Permit - Planning Case 2019-07 for a 145-foot pole with a 5-foot lightning rod as shown in Attachment 4, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit is required to construct (erect) the (pole). 2. The pole plans must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. The contractor shall contact the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Commission Summary – July 16, 2019 2 4. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement. Conditional Use Permit The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit - Planning Case 2019-07 for a 145-foot pole with a 5-foot lightning rod as shown in Attachment 4, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: 1. The pole shall comply with the requirements in ARTICLE XXX. TOWERS AND ANTENNAS of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The pole shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. 3. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by federal, state, or local authorities. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 18, SUBDIVISIONS: DESIGN STANDARDS (STREETS AND FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS). MacKenzie Walters and Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. Chief Don Johnson discussed the fire department’s viewpoint on the need for these design standard changes. Jason Wedel provided information from a public works and maintenance point of view. Commissioner McGonagill discussed his concern with the word temporary and his belief that the amendment needs to be tighten up. Chairman Weick opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. After discussion between commission members the following motion was made. Randall moved, Reeder seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 18 concerning Street Design Standards. All voted in favor, except Commissioner McGonagill who opposed and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Randall noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated June 18, 2019 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE. Kate Aanenson provided updates from the City Council on the redevelopment of the Applebee’s site, Planning Commission Summary – July 16, 2019 3 the conclusion of the Red Cedar Point variances decision, Control Concepts site plan, discussions with the property owner of 1891 Arboretum Boulevard guided for industrial development, approval of Camp Tanadoona, grading plan for The Park, and agenda for the joint commission/City Council tour which will be held on Wednesday, August 7th. McGonagill moved, Skistad seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JULY 16, 2019 Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Randall, Michael McGonagill, Doug Reeder, and Laura Skistad MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad and John Tietz STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; MacKenzie Walters, Associated Planner; Jason Wedel, City Engineer/Public Works Director; and Chief Don Johnson, Fire Chief PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR AN XCEL ENERGY METER READER POLE LOCATED AT 2150 LYMAN BOULEVARD. Al-Jaff: Thank you Chairman Weick, members of the Planning Commission. The application before you is for a site located at 2150 Lyman Boulevard. That is north of Lyman Boulevard and south of Chanhassen High School. The site contains the Bluff Creek Electric Substation which has been in operation since the 1980’s. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan to construct 145 foot pole and a 5 foot lightning rod on top of that pole. The width of the pole at the base is 2 feet and it tapers as it goes up. The applicant is requesting to add meter readers at the top at the 145 foot level. Monopoles under our city code are only permitted under the conditional use permit process and that’s why this application is before you. One of the requirements within the city code is that we look at area within a mile radius to see if there are other poles that might be able to accommodate this request and yes, there is one within close proximity to this one. However it is 120 feet tall. It is at capacity at this moment so they can’t add anymore to it. As such the necessity for this one requires that we process this application. One other thing to add is this is a necessary public utility and they have gone through the Public Utility Commission approvals. Again this application is before you because our city code requires all poles to go through a conditional use process. The pole is proposed to be located on the site maintaining setbacks that far exceed those that are required by ordinance. The city code requires a 50 front, rear yard setbacks as well as 10 foot side yard setbacks. As you can see all of these setbacks far exceed the 200 foot. Currently there are an array of poles and electric structures on the site. We asked the applicant to put together an image of how this new pole would blend in and it will have the same color and blend in perfectly with the surrounding area. Staff is recommending approval of both the conditional use permit and site plan with conditions. We’ll be happy to answer any questions. The applicant is here if you have technical questions on this topic they will be able to address your questions. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 2 Weick: Okay. Certainly open it up for commission comment. I would say thanks for that picture. It shows up on page 4 of 10. You don’t have to show it again but with the pole put in there and in context of the surrounding landscape and other structures that are there I think that’s really useful so thank you for that. McGonagill: So I guess first question I have is why is it required at this time? What has changed? What has occurred? The fact that now you need it because of this system is already up and running so why is the applicant coming forward and saying we need a pole? Aanenson: I think we’ll just let them. I think at this point I think it does appear it’s going to be more technical so if you want to introduce yourself. Chris Rogers: Good evening Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, my name is Chris Rogers and I am a Principal Land Rights Agent with Xcel Energy. I also have with me Mr. Chris Sarles who’s probably going to be able to be better suited to answer the technical question. We call this our field area network or FAN for short The field area network is part of our advanced grid. You may have heard of the term smart grid which is coming up and many utilities are going to this for basically taking it to the next level. Not just to read our customer’s meters but it’s a way for us track our loads. Track our outages. We’d be able to respond quicker to outages. It’s a two way communication between our substation and our customer’s meters. It’s also a way for us to manage our load and our generation so when the grid is all together, not just with Chanhassen but with all the other areas combined, we’ll be able to manage that grid a little bit better on a distribution level which is your residences and your businesses locally but we’ll also be able to better manage our renewable energy on the grid which is pretty important right now. We have a big initiative for that too so it is reading our customer’s meters. In a few years our customers will have these smart meters installed. I’m going to bring Chris up. He’ll probably be able to speak a little bit better about the existing system because we do read our own meters now. Weick: Yeah. Chris Rogers: The system we have now is a little bit outdated from the mid 90’s and maybe Chris if you want to elaborate on the filtering network and what we’re replacing. Chris Sarles: Yeah good evening. So I was actually one of the folks that actually put in the original network that was here that is working today. Weick: Okay. Chris Sarles: With Cell-Net and I’m working on this network now. The main difference with it is the older network is made of one way meters so they chirp out their signal. It’s picked up by an MCC it brought up and is brought into the system but there’s no two way communication so Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 3 we can’t manage the meter in any way. We just read it. This way we have additional programs we can do. There’ll be new rates and different things that the company can offer customers. These meters, this two way network is also a mesh network so it will allow us to communicate to sensors. Voltage sensors. RTU’s. Different things like that through the mesh and that gives us some resiliency we don’t have today on the one way network, if that makes sense. Weick: It does. McGonagill: I’m kind of familiar with these kind of networks so with this it’ll be able to do, can you go in and calibrate your meters and look at them through the mesh and back up to see you know they’re accurate. They’re not. And I guess you could also then turn them on or turn them off if a customer wanted that kind of service. Chris Sarles: We can do remote disconnect, yep so that would be a shut off sensing thing but you know there’s a lot more sensors that are available on these newer meters. McGonagill: Sure. Chris Sarles: So we can sense hot sockets and things like that you know which are problems that can be taken care of. McGonagill: So unfortunately I had an outage this winter and I could go on your system and I could see where it up and how many customers were impacted so that’s kind of what you’re doing except just a little bit more beauty to it I guess. Chris Sarles: Yes. Although today we’re actually still reliant on customer call in’s. McGonagill: Okay. Chris Sarles: To figure out those outages and then we do have an OMS system that tries to take care of it but it’s tied in with a calling. This new system we actually can, since it’s two way and it’s mesh you don’t just have that last gap signal from the meter saying ooh I’m dying and that’s it but it actually, it can, it can go a little longer. It can re-route it’s signal so if it can’t find the way home through the normal ways it can find another path to get the data back. McGonagill: How many customers will this reach in this area? Where the tower is what’s the air length, how many meters are you going to pick up with it? Chris Sarles: So I, you know it goes in and out because of the landscape but we’re looking at it like 3 to 5 miles. A distance of radius. McGonagill: Okay is this first tower of several that are coming or is it? Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 4 Chris Sarles: It’s not the first tower of several that are coming. There’s actually one, I think today we actually stacked it in Eden Prairie. McGonagill: Okay. Chris Sarles: At the Eden Prairie substation which is right on 212 and 5 there right south of 494. McGonagill: Okay what about in Chanhassen though particularly? Chris Sarles: This would be the first one for here. McGonagill: Will there be more I guess is my question? Chris Sarles: I don’t think we’d need another one in Chanhassen, no. Not of this type. What we will have is we’ll probably end up with a handful of pole top. McGonagill: Repeaters. Chris Sarles: Yeah, access points and relays to go along to help enhance the mesh so if there’s places where your meters are thin you know they’ll throw a relay in there and that will help the mesh out. McGonagill: I guess the last question, if this thing happened to be in fact it’s the tallest thing around and does get hit by a lightning strike, yeah you’re grounded. You have that but similarly it can get fried. You know if that goes does the electrical grid go down and then stuff just goes on automatic itself? Chris Sarles: You know your electricity would still be delivered. McGonagill: You just couldn’t read it. Chris Sarles: We just, we would lose visibility temporarily for it. And the ground is pretty good on it. McGonagill: Oh yeah. Just asking. Chris Sarles: Yep it’s a good question though and it is possible to take it out. McGonagill: Anything with electronics. Chris Rogers: You’ll see a number of spikes in the substation too. We have a lot of other lightning protection there too on the box structures that protect the foundation because metal is kind of a lightning magnet too. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 5 McGonagill: Thank you Mr. Chair. Aanenson: I just want to point out to the Planning Commission we do have two electric providers in the city. The southern end of the city it actually has a different provider so there’s a substation down there on 212 just on the east side of Gedney Pickles so just when they’re talking about coverage area there’s a different area down in the southern part of the city. McGonagill: Good point, thank you. Weick: Other questions? Skistad: Yeah. Weick: Go ahead. Skistad: So the, you say 3 to 5 mile radius. Chris Sarles: Roughly. Skistad: Is there ultimately like a 30 mile radius? I was reading some information on the network that mentioned you could go out to 30 miles. Chris Sarles: We could go out 30 miles potentially if the line of sight is clear. The noise floor is low and those are two big factors we don’t really have here and so the terrain will cut it short in a lot of areas. Skistad: So this is primarily for wind energy? Chris Sarles: This pole? Skistad: This pole is created primarily for wind? Chris Sarles: No I wouldn’t say that but it will allow the, it allows us to better see our grid. We can do a lot better job of managing the voltage on the grid at connection points say when energy wanted to connect or interconnect with us then we would be able to manage that better. Much better locally because you know as that power comes onto the grid we have to make sure it’s at the right voltage or you know your houses are going to take on a lot more potentially so. Skistad: Right. Chris Sarles: It cleans that up. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 6 Skistad: Okay. So it sounds like there’s additional equipment that will be needed by customers to go with your tower? Chris Sarles: Down the line yeah, the smart meters will be coming yep. Skistad: What’s the estimated cost for those per customer. Chris Sarles: I don’t know that we’re charging anything for customers right up front. It will come in a rate case from a PUC so there’ll be monies and there may be a small increase coming down the line but it would be small. And then to counter that since not only we can see, manage our energy better you also will have the ability to manager your energy better if you so choose to. We’ll have a lot better customer you know websites. Things are going to improve around that so you’ll be able to see your energy in a much more granular manner than you can today. McGonagill: So could you interface with your meter and read it to yourself? Chris Sarles: No. I don’t think we have that capability and I don’t think we’re going to but I think you could look through your website and potentially just see your meter and see how it’s reading. Chris Rogers: We’ve got to be careful how we protect that information. Chris Sarles: So that will help. So that could potentially lower your bills then. That’s what our expectation really is on this. One of the projects we’re serving is, it’s call Integrated Voltage Optimization and what that is is we put a whole bunch of sensors out on those feeders and right now we just kind of generate enough electricity on that feeder to make sure that there’s enough voltage at the back end of that feeder that everybody’s happy working but a lot goes into the ground. It just goes, it gets wasted so since we can manage and measure that a long way we can actually lower the overall voltage of that meter making sure that the end customer is still maintained but we’re going to have to generate as much that will lower our generation costs which in in turn should lower the overall bills. Skistad: And I guess another question I have is, if it’s wireless what sort of radiation output are we putting? Chris Sarles: So it’s a 10 watt radio at this time and it’s, it’s you know it’s stronger than your cell phone but it’s also much farther away. There’s the MPE which is basically the allowed time you have to be in front of that tower and how close you can be is 18 inches so you can be within 18 inches of those antennas right on the front of them for half an hour safely according to the FCC so, and that’s the antenna that’s 145 feet high. Skistad: Okay. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 7 Chris Sarles: Yes, now the meters they’ll also put out an RF as will the AP’s. Those are at long lot so those are very similar to your cell phone and they’re in the same band as your cell phone. They’re in that 900 band. This tower will be running at 3.65 to 3.7 gigahertz so. Shorter waves. Skistad: It’s interesting that to read a little bit on this. I didn’t know anything about it before and at one point they were going to use cell phones on this. Is there any possibility of having? Chris Sarles: On our tower? Skistad: Yeah I’m just curious. We, for security reasons of our substation and just of our equipment because we will be running our grid we will not want co-location on this particular tower. Chris Rogers: It will also be inside the secured fenced area of the substation which is closed to the public. On our pavement. We don’t other carrier parties in there because it’s not safe basically and anybody who goes into our substations require an escort and proper clothing and those type of things too so it’s a very secure area. Skistad: Okay. Weick: So we’ll need more poles. Skistad: Kind of was curious if they were going to use technology or if you were going to change over and maybe we could. Chris Sarles: I mean there’s an unsecured tower about what, 2 miles up the road maybe. Something like that. Maybe the cell carriers can go on that. They have a space on it. Weick: Good questions. Skistad: I think that’s all I have. Weick: Okay. Any other questions for Xcel? Don’t see any. Thank you very much. Chris Sarles: You’re welcome. Weick: Appreciate it. At this time I will open the public hearing portion. Seeing nobody come forward I will close the public hearing and open this for commissioner comment. Discussion. Motion. Thoughts. McGonagill: Mr. Chairman I’d be glad to make a motion. Weick: That’d be wonderful, thank you. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 8 McGonagill: Very good. I move that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan to allow a 145 foot pole with a 5 foot lightning rod for the Utility Meter Reader subject to the conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Weick: Thank you. We have a motion. A valid motion. Do we have a second? Randall: Second. Weick: We have a second. Any comment, discussion for the record before we vote? McGonagill moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan to allow a 145 foot pole with a 5 foot lightning rod for the Utility Meter Reader subject to the following conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Site Plan Review The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Site Plan Permit - Planning Case 2019-07 for a 145-foot pole with a 5-foot lightning rod as shown in Attachment 4, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit is required to construct (erect) the (pole). 2. The pole plans must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. The contractor shall contact the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. 4. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement. Conditional Use Permit The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit - Planning Case 2019-07 for a 145-foot pole with a 5-foot lightning rod as shown in Attachment 4, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: 1. The pole shall comply with the requirements in ARTICLE XXX. TOWERS AND ANTENNAS of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The pole shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 9 3. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by federal, state, or local authorities. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Weick: The motion passes 5-0. And as we switch players at the desk, welcome MacKenzie. Walters: Thank you. Aanenson: And while we’re waiting for those of you that talked about gamma rays that was a big conversation when we did the National Weather Service. They had a lot of information in on that. Yes, a lot of information on that and we did get, but there’s some of the code amendments we added recently regarding 5G technology where we talked about where you could put, so we see towers going lower and more frequency as they move out in this area so kind of the changing technology. Skistad: I’ve seen a few. Aanenson: Yeah. Skistad: Concerning items on the 5G, I mean one that was placed low to the ground and what it did to a tree on one side versus another. I don’t know if that’s real or not. I would like to know. Aanenson: We’ve got standards in place in the right-of-way and so we haven’t had too many requests for that yet but we’re still further out. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 18, SUBDIVISIONS: DESIGN STANDARDS (STREETS AND FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS). Walters: Alright if you’re ready we’ll get started with the discussion of some proposed code amendments. So this is part of a, just to frame this a little bit. We’re in the process of updating the City to reference to most standard the 2015 Minnesota Fire Code and part of that is going to require us to update our street design standards. Because those are contained within Chapter 18 we’re going to be discussing those today as a public hearing which we’re required to by city code. They will then be bundled with the other items for the Chapter 9 Fire Code re-write that will go before the City Council on August 12th but first it will be discussed by the council at a work session on July 22nd so the council will see this in combination with some other re-writes to Chapter 9 of the City Code but because that’s outside the scope of the Planning Commission the public hearing, tonight we’ll be just focusing on the street design standard changes in Chapter 18 and we’ll explain a little bit why we’re adopting these as part of Chapter 18 instead of in Chapter 9. But without further adieux I’ll jump right into it. So as I mentioned we have street design standards in Chapter 18 and they differ from those that are cited in the appendix to the Minnesota Fire Code. So if you would have adopted the Appendix D as part of Chapter 9 we would have Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 10 created two issues. We would have created a non-conformity within our city code because we would have referenced standards that are different than our street design standards and that would have been pretty confusing for developers to navigate because there would have been two different standards within our code that didn’t agree. The second issue is the way the State law reads the final Court of Appeals for any issue with anything in Chapter 9 is the State Fire Marshal so in theory if we would have adopted Chapter, the street design standards in Chapter 9, if the City wanted to give a variance for that, you know they felt it was appropriate to say have a smaller cul-de-sac or something the City Council wouldn’t necessarily have the authority to do that and it could be appealed to the State so we wanted to balance, making sure these standards were established because we do feel they are very important with also making sure that we had local control to determine what was best within our community so the best solution we came up with was to take all the provisions that are in Appendix D, basically copy and paste them into Chapter 18 and that way we removed any potential inconsistencies between our Chapter 18 and the Appendix D Fire Access Road Standards. And also then because it’s in Chapter 18 it goes through the normal Chapter 18 variance standards rather than the Chapter 9 variance standards. So we felt that we absolutely had to pick up the Appendix D standards because they are important for ensuring the safe and efficient travel and emergency response vehicles and we also wanted to make sure that at the end of the day the City was the authority on this and that it was within our normal variance process. So the big changes are as follows. Our current cul-de-sacs have a turn around radius of 45 ½ feet and we would be amending it to be 48 feet which is the standard that’s in the Appendix D of the State Fire Code. Similarly we have a maximum cul-de- sac length of 800 feet in our current city code and that would need to be reduced to 750 feet to meet the standards of the Appendix D. The other thing is as it currently reads our maximum cul- de-sac length can be, we can grant administrative approval for a larger one if the City Manager feels there was an opportunity for future access or if the topography justifies longer length. We would be removing those provisions and any request for deviation from the 750 foot standard would need to go through the full variance process so they’d need to demonstrate that there was an actual hardship. That it wasn’t a mere inconvenience and the other Findings of Fact that are contained in Chapter 18. We’re also going to be adopting a bunch of new standards. I won’t read through all of these. They were in your packet but basically the fire code is very detailed in terms of making sure that the fire apparatus can navigate so there’s you know minimum street width when you’re near a hydrant. Minimum configurations for turn arounds for various length roads and as I said we’re adopting them wholesale. We feel that those standards were designed by experts in their fields and we think they’re important to ensure safe and efficient access. The one other note I will say is our city code allows temporary cul-de-sacs to have a 90 foot turning radius. We spoke with the fire chief and we’re comfortable keeping that because the idea is these will eventually become through streets. They will connect which brings us to something that we want to discuss as part of this. Oh I have more on temporary cul-de-sacs. So another slide. I mentioned they’re permitted to be a little shorter in the turn radius. We do require them to be located within a right-of-way and we have provisions in place like requiring the developer to put in escrow to guarantee that it’s not a cost burden to the City to remove the temporary cul- de-sac and create a through street. They do facilitate good subdivision design. A lot of times as I’m sure you’ve seen sometimes one parcel comes in but the surrounding parcels aren’t quite ready to develop and temporary cul-de-sacs can be a great tool to create place holders for where we know we want streets to go through in the future. That’s one of the reasons why we allow them to be a little smaller because if we required the full 96 feet and associated right-of-way it Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 11 could potentially lead to some real awkward lot design or poor subdivision design. And that’s also why we allowed them to exceed the maximum length is because the idea is at some point these will connect to form through streets so it won’t be an issue any longer. Unfortunately, or sometimes connections do not go through and so this is just a couple examples we found of some of the longer cul-de-sacs in the city and we highlighted areas where you can see there is the temporary cul-de-sac. It was intended to connect here. For whatever reason the connection did not happen and then the City ends up with a 3,800 foot cul-de-sac when again our current maximum cul-de-sac length is 800 feet and it’d be 750 feet under the new ordinance. And then this is another example where a connection didn’t go through and we ended up with a 2,700 foot cul-de-sac so the reason why I’m bringing this up is one of the reasons why we switch away and make cul-de-sac lengths go through the formal variance process is because we feel it puts increased pressure on the developer to make the case for why it should be an extremely long cul- de-sac and why it won’t connect. And we feel it pushes, we feel it helps illustrate the importance to city places on creating these connections and creates the presumption that streets will connect in the future. And this is something that is going to be coming up in the future. I just highlighted 4 properties that you know obviously there’s no knowing exactly when stuff will subdivide but that had the potential to subdivide and expand and where we have put in temporary cul-de-sacs or planned for streets to go through and where there may likely be issues with creating that connection and where the Planning Commission and City Council will have to weigh in on you know the relative merits of allowing for longer cul-de-sacs or requiring planned connections. And I think I’ll. Aanenson: I’m just going to add a couple comments. So the goal here tonight, we’ve got two experts here. Public Works and Engineering Director and then the Fire Chief because planners like to connect but I think there’s some other reasons to have the controls on the cul-de-sac. I think the challenge that you face is when a new subdivision comes in and people don’t want to make change even though it’s a temporary. As you can see on these drawings they’re not always a temporary level and sometimes it’s 10 years between subdivision connections. Sometimes even longer and we can’t control when someone’s ready to develop and the streets aren’t connected. We can only control what’s coming forward and plan for it in the future so part of what we’d like to do, if you have questions or if the two gentlemen, experts here would like to maybe give some of their feedback of why they want to have more specific language on this so I’ll turn it over to them if they want to make a few comments. Chief Don Johnson: Fire Chief Don Johnson. I suppose you can see my tag. We have, the fire code is more of our Bible here. It lends a consistent practice. It’s based on a few different things. It’s based on International Building Code. International Fire Code and adopted by the State Fire Marshal’s Office so it is kind of our guide book. From my point and standpoint with the cul-de-sacs it’s very difficult to probably explain to people unless you live in my shoes but if we have a structure fire in one of these areas and we call in 5, 6, 7 trucks, 2 of them are going to be over 40 feet long. The other 3 are going to be in the 30 foot length so if we can’t get those turned around, if you want to back one of those out, now we’re backing 5 or 6 of them out. Last night during a storm we had a tree, a considerably large tree go down on Pleasant View. If that was on a cul-de-sac was affected by that it’s going to be difficult to reach past with some of these 2,800 and 2,700 foot cul-de-sacs so one of the reasons they have 750 listed out is I carry enough hose to probably get through one of those obstacles but when we start talking about impeding Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 12 services and that would be my point in a lot of these. I have not seen in my time here, which is short in 5 years where we’ve developed a cul-de-sac that connected. I know there was one previous to my coming here but it turns into quite a level of concern with the folks that are already on that home. I would say that if you would consider that when you make these decisions that you’re impacting folks that haven’t even bought homes yet and it’s not just the fire service. It’s fire, police and EMS that in some instances have to go a pretty long route to get down to the bottom of these places so in a good situation it’s okay but I can’t always promise that we have good situations. So with the lengths of the streets, the widths of the streets, especially in some of these longer areas if I do have an incident where we, depending on what side of the street the hydrant’s on, if I start pulling hose across I’m not going to be able to get any vehicles past that either so enough with the cul-de-sacs but that’s one of the reasons that we have that. The other piece of Appendix D also addresses the apparatus, aerial apparatus length. So any commercial developments going in, 30 foot above grade requires a certain load. Again that truck is 40 feet long and managing those roads on the way in can be difficult if we’re not bringing them to widths. As well as you’ll see some of the hammer heads and some of the ways those other roads and most of that ends up being in private residential, private streets such as townhomes and some of these cottage homes where you know there’s not a lot of homes on the street. There has to be some type of turn around depending on the length and I know talking with the Public Works Director that this probably wouldn’t be approved under public roads anyways but it’s one of the things that this Appendix deals with fire lanes. It deals with a lot of the different dynamics off how we set up our commercial and residential developments and it needs to be in there but it also allowing it to be an ordinance gives the council the flexibility to make some decisions past the fire code. So I can stand for questions if anybody’s got anything specific on fire apparatus. McGonagill: I do as always. You know part of what my business was was managing risk in another business and what you’re talking about is managing risk. Now when I was first reading this I was going okay, I was looking at cul-de-sacs and length trying to balance out which was the higher risk. I think you’ve answered that in my mind but I’m going to put that question to you. When you look at the risk matrix, which is what we do when we’re managing risk, temporary. You know the cul-de-sac restriction, size, diameter and length, which one’s the higher risk for you to operate and manage an event? Chief Don Johnson: You know to be honest it’s getting to the scene and setting up is probably more of, would be my concern than egress. Or getting out so the cul-de-sac itself allows me to turn that vehicle around in lieu of backing completely back out of the cul-de-sac so I think that’s probably, that would probably be a better concern for me is the overall length. McGonagill: So excuse me, so you’re saying the cul-de-sac is a bigger issue for you than the length. Chief Don Johnson: No the other way around. So the length of the actual cul-de-sac is what’s going to impede me getting to the scene and start handling the emergency. The cul-de-sac allows me safe exit on, and a less impactful exit on getting back out with some of the larger vehicles that we operate. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 13 McGonagill: This is a question for staff. MacKenzie if you had to look at the, use the word density, how many areas, how many temporary cul-de-sacs do we have percentage wise and then also cul-de-sacs, I’m talking about the circle part of the diameter and how many are over our standard, or decided length? Aanenson: We don’t have that data. I can get it for you. McGonagill: Well I’m just curious. Is it a lot? Is it you know, is this a common problem we have? Chief Don Johnson: I would say it’s not just in Chanhassen. It’s not just a common problem but one of the changes that’s coming with the proposed change is to actually, our current standard is a 90 foot cul-de-sac. McGonagill: Right. Chief Don Johnson: And this change would bring about a 96 foot cul-de-sac for anything that would come in after this proposal. McGonagill: And that’s driven because of the equipment that you have? Chief Don Johnson: Correct. Correct. I’d like to add one other thing about cul-de-sacs if you think about 20 years from now or go to the north end where they’re reconing streets, that’s the longer that cul-de-sac is while they’re doing the recon and repaving also impacts our time during that timeframe as well so again it’s just, I look at it differently because of my response and that’s. McGonagill: Yeah I agree with you and I’ll have some comments when we get in discussion. Weick: Okay. McGonagill: So what you’re saying is the length is the bigger risk, if I can use that term, than the diameter. Both are concerning. Okay. It’s harder to fix the length than it is the other thing so okay. Thank you. Wedel: So from a public works and a maintenance standpoint, talking about cul-de-sacs, a couple of reasons why we try to avoid cul-de-sacs whenever possible is because one, they require local trips to usually have to come out of their neighborhood and go onto one of our collector or arterial roads. The Longacres example that was shown on the screen. If you wanted to get to a neighbor’s house you have to go out onto Highway 41, go down the street and then get back into the neighborhood and you’re just trying to make a local trip so it’s putting unnecessary trips on our roads that are meant for long durations for getting people through town and getting them to work and now we’re putting local trips on there so that’s adding more congestion. Cul-de-sacs also are larger from an impervious area standpoint so when you’re looking at a new subdivision and the amount of stormwater runoff that is generated from a cul-de-sac versus a normal street, now we’re putting in more, larger stormwater ponds. Our infrastructure that goes to support that additional impervious area is increased because of the size of the cul-de-sac and how much Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 14 pavement is physically there. Chief Johnson mentioned reconstruction. When we reconstruct cul-de-sacs that’s, you know right now the City assesses 40 percent of the cost. 60 percent of the cost is paid out of the general taxes. They’re more expensive to replace for the City so when we do reconstruction projects, cul-de-sacs do add cost to our projects that otherwise wouldn’t be there. And then from a, just purely from a maintenance perspective we use different equipment for snowplowing cul-de-sacs than we do main line streets. Certain equipment is better used for cul-de-sacs versus what the radius is versus main line roads so it takes extra time for us to plow cul-de-sacs and one cul-de-sac you know is not a big deal but incrementally as you keep adding them it does become a bigger deal. We’re adding you know roughly 2-2 ½ miles of streets per year toward our city street network just with new development coming in and we’re not adding staff so our public works staff, the number of plow drivers we have. The number of trucks we use hasn’t changed in over a decade but we’re adding miles of street per year so when we’re trying to be efficient at doing our jobs and getting the snow off the road, cul-de-sacs just add more time and it just takes more effort for us. And then lastly that’s not so much related to the road but the utilities beneath the road. Our watermains. So our watermains when you have a cul-de-sac they just get stubbed to the end of the cul-de-sac. They’re not looped. They’re not connected to the rest of the water system so all the homes that come off that stub, that water can get stagnant more easily so, which then requires us to go out and flush hydrants and so some things to keep the water fresh in those cul-de-sac areas so those are just some of the reasons from a public works and maintenance standpoint why we try to minimize the use of cul-de-sacs if possible. Weick: Kind of along those lines though, question for you and it just kind of popped up when you were talking about it. I understand, I fully understand all the reasons why we’d prefer not to have them but do you find that homeowners prefer cul-de-sacs? From a safety, a perceived safety standpoint or you know slower traffic flow and those kind of things, do you fight that where? Wedel: Absolutely. I mean I think people value the quietness of a cul-de-sac.. They feel like, though they shouldn’t, they can allow their kids to go bike around in the street because they think there’s less traffic. We certainly don’t encourage using the streets for playgrounds and basketball hoops and everything else that tend to end up in cul-de-sacs and I would say developers they get more premiums for lots. Weick: And that’s where my question was. Wedel: And cul-de-sacs are so I mean there is a financial benefit to developers to put in cul-de- sacs so there is that wrestling with what’s the right design for the neighborhood versus a developer who is just really wanting to get the most bang for their buck from their projects. Weick: Right. Chief Don Johnson: I would just add to that, that I’m not opposed to cul-de-sacs. I would just like conforming cul-de-sacs which allow us you know an in and out. Again I would just say that you’ve got one way in to this location. You don’t have multiple ways in if something were to impede that roads or for any reason for any of the services. I’m not just here on behalf of the fire Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 15 service but you’ve got one way in so which sometimes is time for whatever is going on in that area. Aanenson: So I’m going to circle the conversation back to planners. It’s nice to have other experts here to get their opinions so we’re grateful for that. They’re here with us but I think the big issue that we look at is we provide a stub street. We see how it’s going to be connected so our job as planners we see is how do we make all the pieces of the puzzle fit. Not every piece is ready to go at the same time. Some people have bigger pieces that they can maximize their development. Some people have smaller pieces that are dependent on getting extension from somewhere else and we have regulations of how you divide your property. We don’t want every property to be to access off a collector road you know so we have internal so we look at that. When one piece comes in we always ask or we used to a lot in the past when we had minor pieces to do a ghost plat. How would this street be extended in the future and so when you do that, and when we had this conversation now it’s a lot different than when you have a bunch of people in there saying I never wanted this to go through. I didn’t anticipate that and that’s when it becomes harder but what we’re trying to encourage now is kind of being more deliberate in these, in understanding. That’s using you to be the advocates or educate the public that we believe that by not connecting certain streets you really as was stated you’re limiting other factors. The potential of someone else to divide it because they can’t get access because we require a public street. Additional trips because of the way that they get to their property so we just want to think through those a little bit more so I think, I don’t think I’m confident by having you know more sensitivity on this topic when we come forward with some of these subdivisions that it will help us all make better decisions and it does create the flexibility of what we wanted for the City Council. There was some unique, which we’ve had in the past whether it’s steep slopes, a significant wooded area that we didn’t want to but I think the first thing the neighbors said we don’t want to connect to somebody. Well we’re all connected to each other and again this is plannereze. We’re all connected. Our kids are going to go to school together. That sort of thing and the mailman’s going to go by. The school bus is going to go by. The garbage is going to go by. Those are all the extra trips that Jason had talked about that you’re actually putting on the roads. By not letting the garbage man go through or the mailman you’re actually creating extra trips so those are the things that we think about and the like so I think we just want to make sure that we’re giving good consideration as we move forward on these subdivisions, and especially those little infill parcels that we had provided access. We have planned ahead and said no, we don’t want you to take advantage of that and we do have some that are coming forward. I think the easy pieces have been taken. Some of the more challenging ones are coming forward so again this will be a discussion with the City Council but this is a public hearing Chairman so if there’s any additional questions I would. Weick: I think fairly easy questions. One, so a temporary cul-de-sac we’re changing the. Aanenson: Radius. Weick: The radius and then, but we’re not changing, a temporary cul-de-sac still needs to be at a max 750 feet correct? Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 16 Walters: Yes it would be subject to 750 foot max and to clarify the radius for the temporary cul- de-sac would not be changing. It would still be that 90 foot yep. But it would need a variance to go over the 750 feet. Aanenson: Yeah. Weick: Just like any of them would. Walters: Exactly. Weick: And then we’re not changing how a cul-de-sac is measured correct? Walters: No we are not. Weick: Okay. Because I know we’ve had a lot of discussion over that in the past. Walters: I briefly considered redoing the graphic to try to further clarify what I thought was a very clear graphic but decided I was still happy with my graphic. Weick: We want to get home tonight so we’ll jut leave that where it is. Yes please. Skistad: Just have one question. So if I look, if you look at Foxwood and you have that circle down there. So I’m assuming that the person who would purchase one of those properties next to it would have a pretty good idea or would be able to go and ask you guys. Aanenson: Yeah there is a sign down there too. We typically do that now. There weren’t in the past that says this road will be extended in the future. Skistad: Okay. Aanenson: But that doesn’t mean that they’re going to acknowledge that or. Skistad: All I’m saying is. Aanenson: Correct. They can have. Skistad: It’s there. It’s in the city so it’s not a surprise to anyone unless they haven’t done their homework. Aanenson: Actually have…in your comp plan too because that’s a connection that’s going to actually tie into Powers Boulevard where we’ve got a lift station. That road will come all the way back up onto 101 so that’s kind of an important thread yeah for a connector. Skistad: Okay and I was just using that one as an example there. Not, you know I look at some of the other ones and there’s clear issues. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 17 Aanenson: Well I would say this. I think sometimes the biggest challenge is we have different densities. When you’re talking single family single family because whether it’s the lot size it’s still single family homes and typically they’re within the same square footage or price range. I think the more challenging connections are if you have a townhome going to a single family neighborhood which we do in certain areas but typically we like to see the townhome closer to the collector and the single family for the back so the single family with the less trips are going through the more dense if that makes sense. We typically do not try to mix those two together. Skistad: Okay. Weick: But the trips are certainly no light matter. I think the City Council now is dealing with repairing roads right? Aanenson: Oh yeah. Weick: It’s a direct, you know I live on one of those cul-de-sacs that yeah I would love the road to be replaced right but we can’t afford as a city to replace every road because the trips are higher and the road’s getting deteriorated faster and that’s unfortunate. That’s a real side effect of increased trips. That’s not just a kind of a thing people say so. Anyway all real issues. Any other comments? Questions. McGonagill: No discussion? Weick: Well open the public hearing. Right sorry. I will at this time open the public hearing portion. Seeing nobody come forward I will close the public hearing and open it up for commissioner comment and discussion and motion. McGonagill: Well then I’ll start and you know thank you MacKenzie for the work you’ve done on it. I don’t believe anything’s ever temporary particularly when it comes to safety. I never built a temporary pipeline. I don’t have temporary airplanes. It’s permanent. When you build something on the ground, particularly a road it’s permanent so I don’t, I’m not in favor of a 90 foot temporary cul-de-sac because the odds of it becoming permanent in this day and age are becoming harder and harder in my mind so I think you lock a design. There’s no temporary patches in my Bible. If you have a Bible it’s a Bible and that’s what you use so I’m, I’m rigorous about that particularly on safety matters. There’s other things that I’d go all day on but that. I think the other point, and you’re right Chairman. Mr. Chairman the amount of trips on our roads, particularly on cul-de-sacs because I live in Longacres. We have a ton of them, due to just the fact of the way our garbage situation is now with garbage trucks and now we have, we have to pick up, we don’t have a place to dispose of our lawn waste. There’s another trips and those trucks are getting bigger. When they make those corners it just grinding those streets to bits and then with the increased delivery mail due to home deliver of products like Amazon, now more trips. So there’s, that hits me with two things. The roads are going to go higher and higher use. Therefore you need to make them more vehicle friendly which makes, you want a larger turning radius I mean for them frankly and shorter lengths. And you just can’t do that. I look at some of the designs going here and go some of these, you know I look at and go, really I don’t want to set that up for future planning commissioners to deal with. I think you’ve got to be Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 18 pretty hard and fast about the way it is. This is our design. This is what we adhere to. We don’t deviate from it. I mean I wouldn’t do that on building a house on fire code and this is no different than that so I, I look at you know I don’t like the 90 foot at all because once it’s there it’s there so it’s I think you put the standard in. They’re all built the same and I think that if, if you have to build a temporary what you might call a temporary because you don’t have a connection on the other side I get that. I agree with your planning staff Kate to push that as hard as you can to put in some sort of skin in the game on the part of the developer but I think we’ve got to plan on the fact that that thing is going to be there. What is a real, and if you particularly have to push back hard, whenever you start to see a cul-de-sac go or road to a cul-de-sac go 1,000 feet, 1,500 feet, 2,000 feet, you’ve got, we just have to fight against that harder because it’s going to be, even at a path we have a 3,500 foot down the road right? And that is bad. I think you could probably handle with the apparatus 1,000 foot. You know 1,200. You would figure it out but when you’re 3 times that we’ve made you a problem that you can’t solve so all that being said I would like to see this design standard tighten up and be tighter to allow fewer exemptions to it because as we get on the road these problems are going to get harder. Not easier. And the only way you can make them easier is with a Bible that you don’t deviate from. So I don’t know what I’d do with the recommendation but I’m just saying I don’t think it’s tight enough. I think it’s got to be more restrictive. This is what we do. Particularly traffic from the roads. Aanenson: I’d just challenge that a little bit because we spent some time. You know we work with developers on this all the time and so, actually Jason and I looked at some different drawings too. You know if you put the burden all on the developer it’s going to be really difficult to develop here. You know if you make them do the connections a little shorter, make the houses set back and not a temporary, they’re not going to be building those and so then it just really, I’m not sure there’s a good solution to that. McGonagill: But a 3 foot is not that much more. 3 foot on a radius on a 90 versus a 96 is it? Aanenson: Well the impact of the driveway is. I mean we looked at the different drawings and again you’re putting a lot of onto the builder so you know we can look at some more recent ones that we just approved that are existing stub streets that don’t meet conformance on the recent larger subdivision that we just did. I think we have 2-3. McGonagill: Two or three. Aanenson: Two or three in there right. McGonagill: I understand completely. Aanenson: So and those are all substandard but putting those larger ones, those homes wouldn’t go in there so when you’re putting someone in escrow and to say to a developer you know you can sit on that in escrow for 15 years until the street goes through. I’m not sure you know. McGonagill: As a come back against your point. I understand that. Our job’s not here to make the developer money. Our job in this case is safety and that’s what I’m hearing and therefore the standard is a standard in my mind. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 19 Aanenson: Sure. Wedel: May I? Weick: Sure. Yeah please. Wedel: Mr. Chair, members of the commission. Weick: It’s a good discussion. Wedel: So the photo that’s in front of you is actually from a project in Prior Lake. So prior to my coming to the City of Chanhassen I worked for the City of Prior Lake and this is a project that I was involved with. McGonagill: So you did this? Wedel: This cul-de-sac doesn’t exist anymore because the street went through but part of what was done here is, you can see the right-of-way lines go straight through, it’s just a normal 60 foot right-of-way width. It doesn’t follow the bubble of the cul-de-sac so it allowed the homes to get built but you can see how close they are to the bubble of that cul-de-sac. They really almost don’t have much of a front yard. It felt awkward and uncomfortable so these homeowners couldn’t wait for the street to go through because they wanted their front yards back so it’s finding that right balance of not, we don’t want to accommodate a temporary cul-de-sac too much so that it feels comfortable that people want it to stay. We want it to feel uncomfortable so that they want the temporary to go away so they can get their front yards back so that was part of the discussion we had. McGonagill: I agree with you because if the temporary, what they do they do become basketball courts. I’ve seen them. I’ve driven past them and then you really fight against them because they want to, it’s a safety issue. Where it’s a safety issue to start with. Chief Don Johnson: Commissioner McGonagill I’d add to that too. This was a discussion that we had because I was kind of on the same page as you and I say that because I don’t see them ever connecting. I see, and I think it was the way that Jason and Kate talked to me about it. I think this is something that we could live with. If we could hold to that 90 in regards to some of these temporaries in limited situations I can live with that as long as we’re not going under 90 which we have in some instances and as this points out it’s pretty easy to see. This isn’t really an appealing, an appealing place to be right now when you can’t even park a car in a part of your driveway without hitting the street so. McGonagill: I agree with you Chief. The only, and I agree with what you said except the problem has, you said you know I agree with it as long as it’s temporary. There’s no rules for what the temporary means. There’s no, you know what you’ve done is given people a way out that says I decide what should be temporary or, you know the council decides and suddenly in my mind you’ve suddenly put a safety issue in the hands of people that you know against a code Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 20 that exists over here that you’re trying to adhere to. That’s why I’m pretty rigorous about these sort of things. Chief Don Johnson: And I appreciate that. McGonagill: And you do it whether you like it or not. It’s the way you do it you know. Does that, because I, give people something and they’ll take this and that’s what’s happened with some of these 3,200 and 3,000, 2,000 foot long cul-de-sacs. Thank you. I mean sorry, I could go on and on about it. It’s a personal thing. Skistad: So my question is why do we really need a temporary cul-de-sac? Why can’t we push the road on this one all the way through like it would and just have a turn around with no houses on that turn around? Aanenson: Right that’s the other, that would be the other option. You wouldn’t let them build on those last few lots and put the cul-de-sac at the end. That could be an option. Skistad: So that could be an option that we could do instead because I’ve seen that before but. Aanenson: But then you’re back to the same thing. You’re back to that street will never go through even though we believe the property to the north in order to develop needs that road to go through but now it will never go through because now we’ve got the perfect scenario. A cul- de-sac with nobody on it that nobody can come down. Plenty of snow storage for the snowplow to go by so I think what we all rationalize is, the neighbors have some skin in the game to get that road to go through because they’re going to end up with a bigger front yard because if you put the cul-de-sac at the end it would be very difficult to push the street through we believe. McGonagill: Yeah then it’s a traffic issue. Aanenson: Right. Right, right. Weick: And we did, I mean from a safety standpoint I mean we did kind of discuss how the lengths are probably more key. You know if we can be diligent about trying to limit I think the length of these in the future to me that’s the more important variable than the diameter. But that’s just my. Skistad: And that can’t be marketed as a cul-de-sac then. Aanenson: Yeah they’re not but people still, they have the perception. And let’s say the property changes 2 or 3 times before the street goes through. Well I didn’t buy into that. I didn’t know that. I was the third buyer so it’s, that’s what I’m saying. It’s a constant education on everybody’s part is that this street was intended to go through and like I said we put those sign down. If you came and looked at the plat you could see the plat doesn’t show a permanent cul- de-sac but most people don’t do their due diligence. If they come talk to us we always would explain that they’re looking at a lot, they should know that that street’s intended to go through. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 21 McGonagill: Can you put something in the code that would, I don’t know it’s a requirement on the city staff that wherever these temporaries are that there is a sign there. That we inspect it every year to be sure they’re there. Aanenson: We do. McGonagill: Well a lot of them the sign. Weick: Signs walk away. McGonagill: Signs walk away. That’s why we can come back and say it’s there and we keep putting it up and. Aanenson: Sure, we put in the chain of title in people’s properties too and you know that doesn’t stop political will to come in a big group and talk about the children and so, that’s why we’re having this. It’s an uncomfortable discussion and we don’t have a project in front of us. It amplifies when you have a project in front of you yeah, so. Chief Don Johnson: Technically by design those would become fire lanes as well and no parking because they would have to be free of access for the turn arounds of whatever is going down there. Whether it’s a garbage truck but those would be posted as fire lanes and no parking for those folks at the end as well. Skistad: I always wonder what you do with some of those tiny developments. Around the lakes. Aanenson: Oh yeah it’s a challenge. Challenge to snowplow. Weick: Good discussion though. Good feedback. Aanenson: So part of you’re discussing tonight will be discussing at the next City Council meeting. We’ll kind of be sharing with them what your discussion was. I mean you’re going to make a motion but we’re also going to share a little bit more detail of the discussion. Weick: It’s going to be part of a work session right? Aanenson: Correct. Yeah so it’ll be a little bit more robust. Weick: Yeah. Are there any other open questions that we need to get answered as a group? Skistad: I think we’re good. Weick: Thoughts of a motion of any kind? Randall: I would make a motion. Proposed motion. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 18 concerning street design standards. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 22 Weick: We have a motion. Do we have a second? Reeder: I’ll second that. Weick: We have a motion and a second. We should pause for comment. McGonagill: Thank you Mr. Chairman. I will vote against it because I do not think it’s tight enough. I think you’re still, even through you have a design standard and the best intention of the planning people and our city council I think it’s just, you just, it’s kicking the can down the road for further debate in this room which we’ve been part of on cul-de-sacs and streets. Do I have the right answer? No but I think you’ve given the street loads. What we’re going through with that. Given the fact with what I’ve heard from the Fire Chief, you know and I’ve benefitted by some of these decisions in my own neighborhood about very long cul-de-sacs so, but I see what’s happening to the place because of it and the amount of traffic that’s increased because of it so while I appreciate staff’s work I will be voting against this amendment. Weick: Appreciate that and also as we’ve talked about, you know I think all of these really valid concerns and comments obviously will be part of the record for the work session and certainly gives that group an opportunity to consider all of your concerns as well. McGonagill: Yeah and I’m not against adopting a standard. Weick: Yep. McGonagill: I’m really not. I think we need one. We desperately need one. I just don’t think this is, this simply leaves too much wiggle room for other, for the problems to continue. Skistad: You’re primarily concerned about the length. McGonagill: Length and the diameter as well. I agree with what he’s saying here so you just set a standard and that’s what you design to. Weick: The length is getting shorter. McGonagill: It has to get shorter. Weick: It’s going from 800 to 750. Randall: But the problem is with the temporary ones that’s. McGonagill: See that now you trying, somebody has a 1,600 foot like that. Randall: I know and you know I was just looking at the map of Stratford, remember that one? The one that was a temporary one that. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 23 Weick: Is now permanent. Randall: No one every knew that it was but I’m looking at the footage of it and like those homes on that cul-de-sac were designed at an angle when we saw the one that Jason showed us where they purposely made the houses so that it was sure of going through you know and is that something in the standard of a temporary that you make it uncomfortable like you said. I like that idea. McGonagill: I do too. Randall: Because I mean you can see it right there. McGonagill: Oh yeah because, that’s exactly the one I was thinking about. Had this big debate and there was a basketball hoop sitting right there and it’s like, and that’s what they were fighting against. Randall: I know. Skistad: They were fighting over the basketball hoop? Randall: No they were fighting over the temporary one because it was supposed to go through and it was a long, lengthy process but yeah so. McGonagill: And so now you have a long cul-de-sac with a shorter diameter. Aanenson: You might be seeing that property again very soon. McGonagill: And they have to come through. Skistad: Could you show, do you have it up there? Could you put it up there again please? Walters: Were you looking at this one or? Randall: No the one I was talking about was Stratford. McGonagill: Stratford you don’t have that. Skistad: Okay. McGonagill: It’s coming so to the commission so anyway, sorry. Weick: But temporary would all still need to be 750 feet. Walters: Yes and to clarify that is one of the changes that is being made under the code as it currently is one of the reasons that it can be approved at a longer length without a variance is if Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 24 there’s a potential for future access and that’s been used to allow for temporary and they’re longer. Those provisions are being deleted. Weick: Right. Walters: In order to exceed 750 feet now they will have to demonstrate hardship and have to convince yourselves and the City Council that it is not a mere inconvenience. You know not a mere we’d like another lot here. That it is an actual hardship. Weick: I mean this gives us more. Aanenson: Oh absolutely. McGonagill: Oh absolutely. Weick: Control. Not if you use that word but over how these things get developed in the future versus what we’ve had in the past. And tightens the length. McGonagill: It does. I would agree with that. I just, I don’t like the word temporary at all and it is what it is. Do it right and you’re done. Skistad: But if we don’t go forward with this then it’s going to be sitting there for all the other developing items or properties that are coming through so I guess for me I’d want to make sure we have something different even if it’s not perfect because I don’t know that we know what perfect is. Weick: Agreed. Also good, valid points. Well we do have a valid motion and a second. And we’ve had good discussion as well for the record. Randall moved, Reeder seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 18 concerning Street Design Standards. All voted in favor, except Commissioner McGonagill who opposed and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. Weick: Motion passes 4 to 1. Thank you all again and thank you for your input and really important and valid. So those are the two items we had this evening. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Randall noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated June 18, 2019 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Randall noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated June 18, 2019 as presented. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 25 COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE. Weick: Kate I will turn it over to you for administrative presentations. Aanenson: I’ll give you the City Council updates. Weick: Yes. Aanenson: So because we did have a meeting on the 24th. They discussed the Applebee’s site. We’ll talk about that when we do our tour. The redevelopment there. Also on a variance on Red Cedar Point. I think we got to a conclusion there. I think isn’t it a win/win when everybody’s unhappy so maybe you want to just explain a little bit what that was. Walters: Yeah. After discussion the council wanted to maintain the longer driveway that the Planning Commission had recommended while also allowing the applicant to maintain their footprint so they allowed the house to move 3 feet closer to the lake in order to facilitate a longer driveway. And so the motion was then changed accordingly to allow for the increased lot cover that would be associated with that. Aanenson: And then also I wanted to note that Control Concept was approved. Remember we had the stipulation on there regarding making sure the driveways, they needed to do a traffic study. They did do that so it was determined that those two driveways should align on Century Boulevard so there’s a piece of property, city property to the north so they’re going to do an easement, driveway easement over that property so that’s in the works right now. …no they’re just giving an easement. It’s a minor change in the driveway approach. That’s it so. Skistad: Oh okay. Aanenson: Yeah. Skistad: That’s not the, that’s the Applebee’s? Aanenson: No. It’s Control Concepts. It was an industrial building on Century Boulevard, yeah. So the Applebee’s, the parking easement was approved. They haven’t executed that document but we’ll go by that on our tour. I’ll talk about in a minute. We did talk to the property owner on 1891 Arboretum Boulevard. That’s the property just to the east of the town, corporate townhouses that are there on Highway 5 and kind of to the west of Paisley Park. On that so it’s 21 acres guided industrial. When we did the Highway 5 corridor study and looked at access there was a right-in/right-out granted on that. They’re looking at potentially trying to put some commercial there. Staff had some concerns about that. They’re going to give us some information regarding traffic and then the City Engineer will meet with MnDOT and see what the status of that right-in/right-out would be there. So that you would see if it comes in for a project. Camp Tanadoona was approved so we’ll be seeing that permit come through this fall and then grading permit for The Park was approved so that’s Phase 1 of The Park so pretty close Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 26 to having a pre-con it sounds like and so I know we’ll check all the construction easements for that first phase which goes a little bit beyond that but the final plat, we’ve got scheduled for that first meeting in August so all the work has been done on our side internally reviewing all the plans. They’re making a couple tweaks regarding the location of a parking lot that was put internally. They want more to the south so they’re working through that. McGonagill: What did they end up with how many lots on that thing? Aanenson: 167. McGonagill: They stayed with 167? Aanenson: Yes. Yep so that’s it for the update. And I just want. McGonagill: One question on the Applebee’s. Aanenson: Sure, absolutely. McGonagill: I had a question from a citizen. They were asking me about that parking lot that Applebee’s put in. Does the, will that be restricted just to the employees or is it public parking? Aanenson: You know we looked at that. There’s really no other uses that would use it. Walgreen’s has plenty of parking so I can’t imagine anybody else. Actually our recommendation is that they put the employees over there. Can we regulate that? We’re hoping they self police on that but there is cross access against all of those properties so we’re guessing on the weeknights that people they’re up to 20 spaces on the Walgreen’s parking lot that’s available. And then there’s also if the tire in the back so there is additional there. McGonagill: Where the question was coming from was growing out of a concern around the Venue and parking, limited you know parking there if someone has an extra car or two they just go park it over there and they leave it there instead of having to park it on the street or something. You know can that happen was the question? Aanenson: Parking on the street? McGonagill: No. Could they, could somebody like say if I had a truck you know could I park and just leave it? Aanenson: I don’t think the easement agreement calls for that but you know could it happen? Yes. Just like someone could park on a public street anywhere in the city without being in front of their property. Skistad: How come that didn’t come through the planning, I’m just curious. Aanenson: It’s an addition, a minor change to an existing building. By temporary, if it’s 10 percent minor change to an existing building then it doesn’t have to go to the Planning Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 27 Commission. So it’s the same thing with the parking on the Control Concepts. Their parking’s going to swing a little bit to the north for Control Concepts and they’ll be coming across the City parking. Excuse me the city property to align that driveway so we would consider that but it’s the same number of stalls. They’re just swing it a little bit to make the driveway work so again we, the city code allows if it’s a minor change. They’re not the number of parking stalls and that sort of thing isn’t changing so for the parking lot it’s less than 10 percent of the overall shared parking so that’s the interpretation. The still have to get all their watershed permits so the review that they have to have, they have to submit all their civils so all that will still go through the engineering department. It’s not any different, we’ve done large additions to existing industrial buildings that they still have to submit all their plans and get approved by the City so our engineering department, water resources and the watershed district will be doing all the permits and they have to submit any other permits that were required for them to construct so. Skistad: And let’s look at that and what happened with the parking lot on the other side where the, I’m trying to think. I don’t go over there because it’s so bad. That little section of parking and all of that, that’s basically the only other through street through Chan is that little frontage road is what I think of it as. Aanenson: Are you talking about Smashburger over there? Skistad: Yeah. Aanenson: Yeah. Skistad: Panera now and now we’re like, it’s hard to like today I was trying to drive in the middle of the day just trying to turn out on either end of those roads. Getting across there is almost impossible so now we’re adding additional you know people. A people burden crossing that road. Aanenson: Yep the council was really in favor of that project so. The other thing I would say I met with the TIF district that was put in place with the apartment project and Aldi’s. That will be Market Boulevard has some improvements and maybe that’s what you want to talk about. Wedel: No I was just going to mention with the Applebee’s parking lot that we did also consult with an engineering consulting firm that specializes in traffic and pedestrian crossing so we did get some input on some design factors that they are going to incorporate into that design so there was some additional help we included as a part of that as well. Skistad: Who do we consult with? Wedel: So for that one we consulted with SRF, an engineering firm. They’re kind of a transportation and. Skistad: Is it we use different farms? Wedel: Yes. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 28 Skistad: On a regular basis. Wedel: We have different engineering consulting firms that specialize in certain things. We use Barr Engineering when we’re dealing with wells. We use SRF for traffic. You know we, so there are different firms that have specialties and so this was one area where we wanted to make sure we were doing all the right things when we were looking at that pedestrian crossing and so they provided some good input on the design that is now being incorporated by them. Aanenson: So one of the things that we were adamant about is the crossing is that we don’t want people to try to cross mid-block and go to that sidewalk so we’re making them move, eliminate the existing sidewalk a little bit closer to the door so we looked at all that and so those are, I would say the last time we used SRF was actually on Paisley Park and they gave us some really good recommendations on bus circulation and traffic into that so I think that’s, they did a good job and they gave us some good insight and Jason didn’t talk about this but there’s actually going to be a median so when you’re crossing, it’s one way in. One way out and then when you’re crossing it will be a raised controlled median so you get halfway across the street and they’re restriping it for the turn into the site so if anybody’s interested we’ll have those drawings out for that meeting when we drive by there too. We’ll go over in a little bit more detail on the tour and Jason’s coming on that one too so we’ll show you how that all works. Skistad: Okay I’ve just seen, I mean just so you know I have seen a lot of comments, community comments that are, people who are very concerned about that. Aanenson: It’s good to know. We’re going to share that with the council. Yep. Skistad: Yeah. Aanenson: So that’s on our tour. I’m not sure where I left off. We do not have a meeting in two weeks. It’s Night to Unite. Walters: I think that’s what it’s called now. Aanenson: So we encourage you to meet with your neighborhood and get to know and that sort of thing so it used to be called National Night Out so we encourage you to do that. Typically we don’t have a meeting. For some reason we didn’t have it blocked out in advance but there will not be a meeting. But instead of that we’ve got a great tour the next night, on Wednesday night so it’s all commission tour. City Council is also invited on that so we’ve got a bus. I’ve given out the agenda so please let us know if you’re coming so we can plan it. I’ve heard from a couple of you. If you can let Jean Steckling know so we’ll start here in the lower level of City Hall. Again we’re going to go by the Venue and Aldi so we’ll have someone from the Venue to talk about the rents. Who’s renting. A little bit more about that. The demographic and how that’s going and then also someone from Aldi’s. Why they picked this site. How that’s all going and then also we’ll talk about Applebee’s. We’ll have a big map showing how they’re going to lay that out and then we’ll go by Arbor Glen. The small lot subdivision so I think that’s, why did they pick that market. How do they think that’s doing. ...Crossing, the senior housing. We’ll Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 16, 2019 29 also have the developer there to talk about that project. Hopefully we can get in on that project but we can take a look around. But we also, that one is already has a sign up for it’s all rented. 130 units so we’ll again look at that demographic for where people are coming from which I think we’d like to know a little bit too on the Venue and then our final stop will be at Greenwood Shores Park and then we’ll walk into the park and we’ll talk a little bit about where we are in the schedule, which you know but maybe some of the other groups don’t as far as you know the first phase. It’s got 4 phases. This is phase 1. The 50 lots and then we’ll maybe have Jill talk a little bit about with the Environmental Commission a little bit about the trees. Some of the natural resources in there and then Hoisington-Koegler will be there to talk about the trail and how they see that developing and time line and costs and some of those things too just for everybody’s edification so hope you can all make it. It will be fun. It’s kind of good to just be collegiate with some of the other commissioners and staff so that’s all I had Chair unless you had any questions or anybody else does. Weick: Any more questions? With that I will entertain a motion to adjourn. McGonagill moved, Skistad seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated August 20, 2019 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Planning Commission minutes dated August 20, 2019.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES AUGUST 20, 2019 Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Undestad, Mark Randall, Michael McGonagill, Doug Reeder, and Laura Skistad MEMBERS ABSENT: John Tietz STAFF PRESENT: Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and George Bender, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC HEARING: LIFE TIME FITNESS PARKING LOT ADDITION SITE PLAN REVIEW. Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Commissioners Reeder and McGonagill asked for clarification on the need for additional parking spaces. Representing the applicant, Justin Schmidt addressed the need for additional parking on the site. Kristie Elfering with Elfering and Associates clarified the issue regarding irrigation. Chairman Weick opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Undestad moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the site plan for a 184 space parking lot expansion for a off-site parking lot for the Life Time Fitness campus, subject to the following conditions and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Building 1. The addition of parking spaces requires additional accessible parking spaces be provided per the Minnesota Accessibility Code. The additional accessible spaces shall be distributed to locations at or near the accessible entrances of the four Life Time buildings noted on the plan. Engineering 1. On sheet C1.00: Under the governing specification notes, reference the City of Chanhassen’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. 2. On sheet C2.00: Existing utilities illustrated on Water Tower Place do not match city records, the developer should request appropriate shape files and as-builts from the city to accurately depict existing locations of utilities for clarity (e.g. the fire hydrant located on Planning Commission Summary – August 20, 2019 2 the east corner of the driveway approach to 2932 Water Tower Place is not illustrated, draintile in the area is not illustrated, etc.). 3. On sheet C3.00: Field locate the existing sanitary sewer service stub and have the plans updated to the exact location; electrical wiring is not illustrated between lights to be removed, show all electrical wiring and call-out removal; plans indicate the reuse and salvage of existing gravel, illustrate location of stockpiles either on sheet C3.00 and sheet C6.00. 4. On sheet C5.00: From the “Utilities Symbols” the existing and proposed storm manhole appear the same, adjust for clarity; from the “Utilities Symbols” there are multiple line types/symbols that are unused in the plan sheets, remove any unused line types for clarity, also ad symbol for “light grey” pavement that is hatched within majority of work area; add ADA compliant ramps; storm structures (catch basins, storm manholes, etc.) that have inverts should be labeled with direction of invert (N, S, E, W) connection type (IN/OUT); illustrate locations of access pits for Stormtech system; RCP pipe from CB 6 to STMH 5 shall be 15” diameter; adjust symbol if storm infrastructure is called out as STMH as currently all STMH’s are symbolized as proposed catch basins; show connection to outlet control structure and reference detail and/or sheet the detail is located on for clarity (STMH 7); reference city detail #5207 for driveway entrance off Water Tower Place; correct name to Water Tower Place; connection to existing STMH on southeast corner of site references “verify existing invert,” applicant shall field verify and update plans accordingly; add note to abandon 6” PVC sanitary stub and to coordinate with Public Works @ 952-227-1300 48-hours prior to commencement of work. 5. On sheet C6.00: Call out for rock construction entrance should also illustrate the entrance on plans; remove silt fence where rock construction entrance is located for proper ingress/egress; relocate silt fence on far east side to the edge of the extents of proposed grading (approximately 40’ to the west), and not on existing impervious surface, adaptively manage with bio logs and other approved erosion control BMPs when tying in new and existing bituminous; show stockpile of salvaged gravel and methods for erosion and sediment control; remove call out for existing and proposed contour and add line types to symbols. 6. On sheet C8.00: The planting legend indicates areas where work would include “sod- disturbed areas”, however no areas are proposed or illustrated to be sodded, update accordingly. 7. On sheet C10.00: Add applicable city details per updates required from Conditions 1-6, which includes, but are not limited to, driveway details, erosion control details, and storm pipe bedding details. 8. On sheet C13.00: Provide MPCA issued Construction Stormwater General Permit; update SWPPP to include every requirement listed under Sections 5.2-5.26 of the NPDES general permit. Planning Commission Summary – August 20, 2019 3 9. On sheet E0.1: Light pole base detail does not provide dimensions of concrete base, rebar spacing, depths, etc., update accordingly; electrical conduit/wire is difficult to read on plans, enlarge text for clarity; provide legend; provide north arrow; Key Note 3 shall replace the word “abandon” with “remove”; Key Note 4 indicates “conductors to be removed”, locate conductors on plan. 10. Provide an updated stormwater report that indicates the property owner and their contact information along with the consultant/engineer who produced the analysis and their contact information. 11. The stormwater report indicates that the underground system will utilize biofiltration. Provide an update to the report that clarifies how biofiltration will be achieved. Environmental Resources 1. All parking lot islands and peninsulas that contain a tree must have an inside width of 10 feet. Parking lot landscaped islands and peninsulas are required to have proper planting soil and irrigation. Planning 1. The applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement and provide the security required by it prior to receiving a building permit. 2. A separate sign permit application, review and approval shall be required prior to site sign installation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. NEW BUSINESS. Bob Generous reviewed items scheduled for the next Planning Commission meeting on September 3, 2019. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Randall noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated July 16, 2019 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Bob Generous reviewed action taken by the City Council at their July 22, 2019 and August 12, 2019 meetings and the Star Tribune article regarding Carver County. Planning Commission Summary – August 20, 2019 4 Commissioner Undestad moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 20, 2019 Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Undestad, Mark Randall, Michael McGonagill, Doug Reeder, and Laura Skistad MEMBERS ABSENT: John Tietz STAFF PRESENT: Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and George Bender, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC HEARING: LIFE TIME FITNESS PARKING LOT ADDITION SITE PLAN REVIEW. Weick: Bob, if you want to take it away. Generous: Yes thank you Chairman, commissioners. As you stated we have a public hearing tonight is a Life Time Fitness parking lot, Planning Case number 2019-09. It’s site plan review for 184 space parking lot expansion. This site, the applicant is Life Time and LTF Real Estate Company is the property owner. As you stated this item is going to Planning Commission, or to City Council next Monday night so it’s a quick turnaround. The property is located at 2970 Water Tower Place. It’s Lot 1, Block 1, Arboretum Business Park 5th Addition. It’s just to the west of this is Highway 41. There’s about a 14 foot drop down from the right-of-way to this site. At some time in the future if 41 is ever lowered that roadway will connect and there’ll be a right- in/right-out at that location. Previously this site had been used for an outdoor exercise facility but now they’re coming in to provide additional parking for the Life Time campus. They own the 3 properties to the north of this as well as the office building to the east of it. The site plan approval for a 213 stall parking lot. They’re adding 184 parking stalls to the site. When the office building to the east of this was built they provided a row of parking that just intruded onto this site. There’s a drive aisle that goes down the middle of the two property lines. As part of the subdivision for the 5th Addition there is cross access and cross easement agreements that were recorded for the two sites. The property is guided for Office Industrial use. It’s zoned Planned Unit Development. It’s the Arboretum Business Park Planned Unit Development. Office and health club parking are permitted uses in the PUD. Not very exciting site plan. It’s a basic parking lot. They’re complying with all the requirements of our ordinance with it. They’re trying to come in as part of this we will put other improvements in. Lighting for the parking area. Landscaping and stormwater improvements. As part of the site plan they don’t show any signage for the property. However under the zoning they would be permitted to come in with a monument sign if they so desired. Grading plan. The site is fairly level right now. They’re just going to grade it out so it drains towards the northeast I believe it is. There will be catch basins Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 2 on that side to take the water to the infiltration system. They will be providing quite a bit of landscaping on this site. I was sort of excited of making this slide because I was able to add both the legend and the plan together so we can tell what those symbols mean. They provided overstory parking. The aisles that don’t have any overstory parking in it will have light poles ins them so we didn’t, we have understory trees that they work out a lot better for everyone. And landscaping does need to be irrigated so they’ll have to incorporate that. That conflicts with one of the conditions that engineering had about abandoning the water service so they’d have to resolve that. As you’ve seen in a lot of new developments the stormwater system is an underground infiltration system so they’ll have the water go through and be treated and then it will connect into the existing stormwater system that goes down the hill to Arboretum Business Park outlot which is an centralized stormwater pond. Staff is recommending approval of the site plan subject to the conditions in the staff report. I should note that condition number 3 of the planning conditions should be deleted. It inadvertently got copied from another report and so, but there’s no articulation in any architecture with this site plan so. And adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. With that I’d be happy to answer any questions. Weick: Anybody can jump in. Reeder: Mr. Chairman my question is why do they need so much extra parking that we don’t have now? Weick: Is that something better for the applicant? Generous: Yeah I believe the applicant will be able to address that one. Weick: Can we save that one? Reeder: Yeah. Weick: Perfect. McGonagill: So Bob how many, if you can tell me, how many parking spaces are there today and where are they proposing to go to? I’m trying to get a percentage of growth on it. Generous: On this specific site or overall? McGonagill: It looks like to me it’s a corporate site. They’re all… Generous: Yeah the applicant has those numbers I believe. And I believe business has been good for them and so that’s why they need those. Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 3 McGonagill: Well yeah it’s always busy there but outside of this, I mean refresh my memory. The last growth, the last plan that was approved there for the expansion was when? 2008? 2017? Generous: Yeah, for expansion? McGonagill: Well you know they made some building recently here. Generous: Yeah those were approved like 10 years ago. McGonagill: Okay. Generous: And then they built the health club and the first office building and then they started the second office building and finally are in for completing that project. McGonagill: And so that second office building was approved when? Generous: Oh about 10 years ago. It was a two phase development. McGonagill: Okay thanks. Generous: I think I had that in the history. McGonagill: 2004, thanks. Generous: So 15 years ago. Yeah August, 2004 it was approved. Weick: Any other questions for the City? Are you thinking Mr. McGonagill? McGonagill: Oh no I’m done. Weick: Okay I didn’t know if you were pondering something else or not. Okay. Yeah go ahead. Skistad: I had several things. I’m just wondering is that a second, are the office buildings just Life Time office buildings or are they going to be rented out to other businesses? Generous: I believe they’re all for the corporate operations. And they actually reduced the floor space for offices on the second office building to provide additional interior parking stalls so. They’ve got too many people driving. Weick: Okay, well it sounds like we have a few questions for the applicant but I will certainly allow you to make a presentation first if you want to add anything. Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 4 Justin Schmidt: So we’re just doing a quick, sorry. Weick: Oh that’s okay. Justin Schmidt: One sec. Weick: Yeah take your time. Well don’t take your time but take some time. Generous: I need to…for all this stuff. Reeder: Mr. Chairman when they got approval for the second office building they’re building on every corner which was parking approved with that? I mean I assume it was. I mean. Generous: Mr. Chairman yes. They meet our standards down below. It’s just their operation is such that they need a lot more. They need more. Reeder: I mean because parking lots don’t pay a lot of taxes. Generous: No. Weick: Yeah. McGonagill: I assume they’re still within the code for hard pan with this. Like the number of impervious surfaces percentage, I didn’t look at that. Generous: Yes they comply with the ordinance requirement. And also as part of it getting the stormwater improvements so they’re getting the pre-treatment of the water before it goes into our system. McGonagill: Okay thank you. Skistad: So does that save us money from a, a state standpoint if we treat it. If it’s treated first and then it goes into the stormwater. Generous: George I don’t know if we can answer this. Pre-treatment saves the City any money in our system? Bender: I don’t know 100 percent for sure but I don’t believe it does. Skistad: It seems like it should, doesn’t it? Bender: Like I said I couldn’t say for sure. Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 5 Generous: I would venture that we save because they are responsible for the maintenance of that system as opposed to the City having to do those so. Long term. Weick: Well welcome. Justin Schmidt: Thank you. Weick: Yeah you bet. Justin Schmidt: I’m Justin Schmidt, a manager for Life Time. We didn’t prepare any presentation but I came here of course to answer any questions and we were just doing some quick math on that existing parking versus the proposed. So existing parking for the campus, so that would be the 3 buildings that would be on let’s say the Life Time campus plus the Water Tower Place piece, that’s 1,221 stalls. Weick: Okay. Justin Schmidt: We’re adding about 24 percent more for a total of 1,519 because we’ll have some head in stalls on the Life Time lots we’ll call them on the north and the south side and then we’ll have the Water Tower Place addition, that’s the easiest way to sort of make sense. As far as additional parking, yeah to Bob’s point. We’ve grown. We’ve expanded staff wise in incredible amounts so that’s why we’re building Corp 2 and then just realizing that parking was not going to work as far as coinciding with how well the fitness piece has been doing. Weick: So that kind of answers why, I think why so much parking is needed. Reeder: Well I’m still not sure. Are we exceeding what we require for parking? Is that what I’m hearing? Justin Schmidt: Yeah. Yeah requirement baseline yes. Reeder: And what you’re saying is that you’re 200 spaces short from your daily requirement for parking? Justin Schmidt: We believe so. Yes. Reeder: Based on? Justin Schmidt: Well it’s talking with traffic engineers and just internal data. Reeder: Okay. Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 6 Justin Schmidt: In order to help relieve parking too we actually, Corp 2 was supposed to be 3 levels of office. The first level is actually still parking so we actually took out the congestion of one level of that building just to alleviate some of that parking. Because if Corp 2 was built out we’d need even more parking. Reeder: Corp 2 is the one? Justin Schmidt: Sorry that’s the building that’s under construction. Reeder: Under construction now. Justin Schmidt: Correct, yep. McGonagill: So is your plan to build it out and so will you be back here again doing this again? Justin Schmidt: Hopefully not. It’s just parking now. McGonagill: If you build out the Corp 2 to become offices or is it always going to be parking? Justin Schmidt: So the first level of Corp 2 is going to be parking forever. Indefinitely. You know to my knowledge and then the second and third levels will be occupied for office. So we’ll have a basement, underground parking in the basement. The first level will be at grade parking inside and then second level and third level will be occupied by office. McGonagill: So I guess the question I have, you have a 24 percent miss in parking spots. What busted? Justin Schmidt: Well the thing that put it over the edge was the construction of Corp 2 and the mobilization area that’s needed to construct that. You know we missed out on all that surface stalls that are currently being occupied by construction equipment. McGonagill: But that will be taken care when construction is done right? Justin Schmidt: Yes. And so then indefinitely when Corp 2 was built just we were going to have to find a parking solution. McGonagill: So is this a temporary parking solution since you’re taking up these corporate stalls with construction equipment? Once that’s done then those stalls re-up again. Justin Schmidt: We’ll still those. Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 7 McGonagill: So I’m not following you. The bust was you just said that it was due to the fact that you had construction equipment on existing parking lot and you took it out of service for a while. Justin Schmidt: Sorry, and in addition with Corp 2 being built that was just going to cause an additional parking constraint. McGonagill: But you didn’t put that in the original design for Corp 2? Justin Schmidt: I don’t think, I don’t think we anticipated how well the athletic piece parking wise was going to take up. Reeder: Mr. Chairman when we considered Corp 2 did we have a parking plan that said they gave us this much parking as they’re required to have? Generous: Yes under, Mr. Chairman under city code they did meet the requirements. Reeder: With or without their first floor parking? Generous: Without that first floor parking. They put an additional. Reeder: So that building stands on it’s own without this lot? Generous: Yes. From a zoning standpoint but from their operation standpoint it’s not meeting their needs. Skistad: And so that was 10 years ago. So 10-15 years ago, okay. Weick: And there was another question, I think Commissioner Skistad asked, and I think we know the answer but these are Life Time only uses for these buildings. Justin Schmidt: Correct. Weick: You’re not renting out space to other people. Justin Schmidt: No. McGonagill: But if you had to take the growth between the 24 percent, the 24 percent swag that you’re going to, how much is consumed, of that is really being consumed by users as opposed to your staff so you think? The growth. I’m just trying to get a feel for it. Justin Schmidt: I would attribute a majority to staff. I guess I couldn’t give you a percentage. I would say a majority. A high majority. Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 8 McGonagill: Where are they parking today since you don’t have it? Justin Schmidt: There’s a temporary parking lot in this alpha field right now. McGonagill: Oh in the. Justin Schmidt: Where we’re proposing to park. To put in an asphalt parking lot. Reeder: And how many cars fit in that? Justin Schmidt: I think, I mean it’s not striped. It was just a temporary lot to relieve congestion during construction. Reeder: Are we talking 200 or? Justin Schmidt: It’s probably 150. It’s not as big as what the buildout is proposed to be. Reeder: Okay. Okay, alright. That’s helpful. I mean it’s refreshing to have somebody provide as much parking as you actually need. Weick: I would agree with you. Reeder: You know they put a parking ramp up…on this huge parking lot too. Weick: Well they’re expensive. I won’t speak for you. Justin Schmidt: They are. Weick: Good. Kristie Elfering: And if I can just interject. Weick: Yes please. Kristie Elfering: My name is Kristie Elfering. I’m with Elfering and Associates. We assisted Life Time with the site civil work. Weick: Welcome. Kristie Elfering: And I’m going to throw a little wrinkle in there I guess that we weren’t aware of, that Bob was mentioning in his presentation is a requirement for irrigation. We actually had a meeting with the watershed this morning and they were pretty adamant that we not irrigate it and Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 9 that’s going to be part of their requirements so I guess we would look for a, I don’t know if that would be a variance then or. McGonagill: So does that affect the trees? Kristie Elfering: No. So all of the trees are planning on being there and then what we’re going to do is there will be a rock, I’m going to call a trench I guess beneath it that will connect into the storm sewer system so the roots will be able to go down into the ground and draw from our underground storm system and so that was why it was required to not be infiltrated. That we’re not adding additional water on the top. That we’re meeting kind of our requirements through that. Generous: And that type of system would meet the irrigation requirements. Weick: Okay. Kristie Elfering: So I guess yeah I just wanted to be clear that we weren’t going against our. Weick: Anything is written right? Okay. Kristie Elfering: Okay just wanted to be clear because I just talked to the watershed and I didn’t want to go back to them and be like oh now we’re irrigating. Weick: Thank you. That’s very good information. Well thank you very much. Appreciate it. At this time we will open the public hearing portion. Anyone wishing to come forward and speak an opinion. Seeing nobody come forward I will close the public hearing and open this item for commissioner discussion. I’ll start. I will say as a member of Life Time Chanhassen I have had to leave, I’ve driven in. I’ve driven around and I’ve had to leave because I could not find a parking. And I was like ah, I’m not going to circle around and wait right, so I just, I went back home. So it happens. It happens at this club. It happens at other clubs too as a matter of fact. I would say that’s a good problem to have probably. But I think any additional parking, whether it be for members or for employees is probably needed for sure and will help alleviate for them you know some headaches I would imagine. Other thoughts or comments? Undestad: Looks good to me. Growth is always good. Weick: Certainly entertain a motion if someone is so. Undestad: Well I’ll make a motion. That the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the site plan for 184 space parking lot expansion subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. And Bob do we need to do anything with number 3 in there? Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 10 Generous: Oh yeah delete. Weick: Condition number 3. Undestad: Delete planning condition number 3. Weick: We have a valid motion. Do we have a second? Randall: Second. Weick: We have a valid motion and a second. Any comment regarding this item before we vote? Undestad moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the site plan for a 184 space parking lot expansion for a off-site parking lot for the Life Time Fitness campus, subject to the following conditions and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Building 1. The addition of parking spaces requires additional accessible parking spaces be provided per the Minnesota Accessibility Code. The additional accessible spaces shall be distributed to locations at or near the accessible entrances of the four Life Time buildings noted on the plan. Engineering 1. On sheet C1.00: Under the governing specification notes, reference the City of Chanhassen’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. 2. On sheet C2.00: Existing utilities illustrated on Water Tower Place do not match city records, the developer should request appropriate shape files and as-builts from the city to accurately depict existing locations of utilities for clarity (e.g. the fire hydrant located on the east corner of the driveway approach to 2932 Water Tower Place is not illustrated, draintile in the area is not illustrated, etc.). 3. On sheet C3.00: Field locate the existing sanitary sewer service stub and have the plans updated to the exact location; electrical wiring is not illustrated between lights to be removed, show all electrical wiring and call-out removal; plans indicate the reuse and salvage of existing gravel, illustrate location of stockpiles either on sheet C3.00 and sheet C6.00. 4. On sheet C5.00: From the “Utilities Symbols” the existing and proposed storm manhole appear the same, adjust for clarity; from the “Utilities Symbols” there are multiple line Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 11 types/symbols that are unused in the plan sheets, remove any unused line types for clarity, also ad symbol for “light grey” pavement that is hatched within majority of work area; add ADA compliant ramps; storm structures (catch basins, storm manholes, etc.) that have inverts should be labeled with direction of invert (N, S, E, W) connection type (IN/OUT); illustrate locations of access pits for Stormtech system; RCP pipe from CB 6 to STMH 5 shall be 15” diameter; adjust symbol if storm infrastructure is called out as STMH as currently all STMH’s are symbolized as proposed catch basins; show connection to outlet control structure and reference detail and/or sheet the detail is located on for clarity (STMH 7); reference city detail #5207 for driveway entrance off Water Tower Place; correct name to Water Tower Place; connection to existing STMH on southeast corner of site references “verify existing invert,” applicant shall field verify and update plans accordingly; add note to abandon 6” PVC sanitary stub and to coordinate with Public Works @ 952-227-1300 48-hours prior to commencement of work. 5. On sheet C6.00: Call out for rock construction entrance should also illustrate the entrance on plans; remove silt fence where rock construction entrance is located for proper ingress/egress; relocate silt fence on far east side to the edge of the extents of proposed grading (approximately 40’ to the west), and not on existing impervious surface, adaptively manage with bio logs and other approved erosion control BMPs when tying in new and existing bituminous; show stockpile of salvaged gravel and methods for erosion and sediment control; remove call out for existing and proposed contour and add line types to symbols. 6. On sheet C8.00: The planting legend indicates areas where work would include “sod- disturbed areas”, however no areas are proposed or illustrated to be sodded, update accordingly. 7. On sheet C10.00: Add applicable city details per updates required from Conditions 1-6, which includes, but are not limited to, driveway details, erosion control details, and storm pipe bedding details. 8. On sheet C13.00: Provide MPCA issued Construction Stormwater General Permit; update SWPPP to include every requirement listed under Sections 5.2-5.26 of the NPDES general permit. 9. On sheet E0.1: Light pole base detail does not provide dimensions of concrete base, rebar spacing, depths, etc., update accordingly; electrical conduit/wire is difficult to read on plans, enlarge text for clarity; provide legend; provide north arrow; Key Note 3 shall replace the word “abandon” with “remove”; Key Note 4 indicates “conductors to be removed”, locate conductors on plan. 10. Provide an updated stormwater report that indicates the property owner and their contact information along with the consultant/engineer who produced the analysis and their contact information. Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 12 11. The stormwater report indicates that the underground system will utilize biofiltration. Provide an update to the report that clarifies how biofiltration will be achieved. Environmental Resources 1. All parking lot islands and peninsulas that contain a tree must have an inside width of 10 feet. Parking lot landscaped islands and peninsulas are required to have proper planting soil and irrigation. Planning 1. The applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement and provide the security required by it prior to receiving a building permit. 2. A separate sign permit application, review and approval shall be required prior to site sign installation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Weick: Hearing none the motion passes 6 to 0. McGonagill: Not too often that happens. Weick: I had to do quick math there. Great we’ll move on to new business. NEW BUSINESS. Weick: Any new business? Mr. Generous. Generous: Yes on your next Planning Commission meeting you have 4 items. Moon Valley is back in for it’s Interim Use Permit. It expires in September and so they need to re-up it. Tequila Butcher is coming in for site plan approval. They are slightly expanding their space but they’re over what we can do administratively. They’re going to put two outside patios on but it adds too much square footage and I can’t do that at the staff level so you’ll see a public hearing. Plus there’s a variance. The want to increase the hard cover on the site. They’re at 70 percent. It looks like they’re going to increase that by 2 percent. We have a variance at 3713 South Cedar Drive. That’s a front yard setback and hard cover variance. And then we have a variance for 6641 Minnewashta Parkway. They’re proposing to replace their existing garage and expand it. Right now it’s under sized so I think it’s like 19 feet wide and they want to go to 24. And but it will go into their side yard setback so we need a variance for that. They are over on hard cover but they’re reducing their overage so we think it’s a plus for everyone so that’s what you’ll be seeing on September 3rd. Weick: Bring your coffee. Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 13 McGonagill: Bob on the Tequila and the Butcher. One of the things I would like to see or at least the discussion when you come in is the relationship between that parking lot and the CVS next door or a Walgreen’s, whatever it is Skistad: Walgreen’s. McGonagill: Walgreen’s. You know if they’re going to plan to use that? Are they not? Is there going to be ability to access that parking lot you know across right there? You know what I’m talking to. Generous: Yeah there’s, I can answer that right now but it also will be in the report. There are cross parking agreements between that whole development and they are allocated 24 of those stalls. McGonagill: Okay well I just, I just so you know. You know I’ll be looking for that and also hopefully there will be a drive thru so you don’t have to go back on the street and come back into the lot. You know make a loop. That’s what I’m looking to see. Just, I don’t know if that’s appropriate Mr. Chairman. Weick: Sure. It’s appropriate in my book. McGonagill: Okay that’s just, once again… Weick: …but that certainly is fine. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Randall noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated July 16, 2019 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Weick: I think we heard, I might have jumped the gun a little bit. We heard some of the administrative presentations. Are there any City Council action updates? Generous: Yes, Lotus Woods was approved on July 22nd. That was a final plat for that two lot subdivision. However it’s tied up in some legal issues and so we’ll see where that goes. And the City accepted the public streets and utilities in Anthem on the Park. And then on August 12th the council approved Ordinance 644 which was the Fire Code amendments to city code. You covered the Chapter 18 revisions and Chapter 20. The conditional use permit for the Xcel meter tower was approved south of the high school. And they approved the final plat construction Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 14 plans and specifications for Park One so that’s the City got about almost 100 acres of open space. 50 acres of wetlands. Weick: Oh that one, yeah sure. Generous: Prince’s old property so. And previously they had approval to start the grading so that’s a lot of the trees are coming down as part of that and people are upset to see the change. Now we have, the City has that survey online about what people want to see in that so encouraging people to respond to that and let us know what they’re looking for as part of the buildout of that open space so. Weick: Yeah. Skistad: Do you know how many people have responded? Generous: I’ve heard that the response is good but I don’t know the numbers yet. I think they’re going to give an update at council on Monday so. Weick: And there’s something noted here about a Star Tribune article. Generous: It’s the County is booming with people coming to our community. Weick: Is that what it was? Generous: That’s what it was and people even who have left previously are now coming back for the great lifestyle that we have. You know we have the number one in health. Number one is wealth in the metro area so you know it’s a great place to be. Lots of amenities. Weick: And places for them to live now too. Generous: And the business community is just growing too. Weick: Sounds like planning. Bender: I heard they’re starting to sell lots. Weick: Are they really? Generous: In The Park, yeah. Bender: Yep. Weick: So they’ve got it kind of, they’ve got it all staked out and everything or? Chanhassen Planning Commission – August 20, 2019 15 Bender: I think it’s more mapped out. Weick: Mapped out yeah. Beautiful land. McGonagill: Bob you talk about the business, have you had many discussions with, because we get this question a lot about higher end restaurants, those sort of things coming in. Talking about that. I mean the Tequila and the Butcher’s coming. Are there any others that you’re, is there any action on that? Generous: Well not the new restaurants but we do have some people are looking at the Perkins site. McGonagill: Yes. Generous: To re-use that so. McGonagill: So there is some action on that? Generous: There’s action on that and then when Avienda comes forward as part of their Lifestyle Center they had restaurants included as part of that so. McGonagill: Okay thank you. Skistad: Do we have any idea when Avienda is going to move? Bender: Million dollar question. Answer is no. We’re waiting on them. Every time they come in with something we respond and then we wait. Weick: Great. Well great discussion this evening. I would entertain a motion to adjourn at this point. Commissioner Undestad moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for CSAH 101 Project Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4. Prepared By Jason Wedel, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the Wetland Conservation Act Replacement Plan for the CSAH 101 Improvements from Pioneer Trail to Flying Cloud Drive.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The City of Chanhassen is the Responsible Government Unit (RGU) for the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). These are the state rules that regulate wetland impact and mitigation. In this capacity, decisions related to approvals or denials of wetland mitigation and replacement applications are the purview of the City Council. Decisions related to approvals or denials of wetland delineations and exemptions can be made at the staff level. The TH 101 Reconstruction project is before the City Council as the project involves 2.92 acres of permanent wetland impact that cannot be avoided or minimized more than the extent that it already has been. Therefore, the project requires wetland mitigation. Replacement is proposed using the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) Road Bank, which is allowed when wetland impacts occur with roadway projects that are being completed for safety improvements. There is no cost to the city to obtain BWSR Road Bank credits for eligible projects. DISCUSSION The TH 101 project is located between Pioneer Trail and Flying Cloud Drive. It is a Carver County project as part of a turnback from MnDOT. The project involves 1.2 miles of safety and capacity improvements in this area with straightening curves, improving site lines, and improving the road from a twolane undivided roadway to a fourlane divided roadway with turn lanes at key intersections. A paved trail is also proposed adjacent to the road to connect existing regional trails. Stormwater management improvements will also be made with the project. The city is both the applicant and the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) for the WCA. A complete application was submitted to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) on July 8, 2019. Prior to that submittal, a meeting with the TEP was held on May 14, 2019 to review the wetland delineation and to discuss the overall project. The application was open to agency and public comment through August 9, 2019. BWSR did receive questions during the comment period which were all addressed. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 9, 2019SubjectApprove Wetland Replacement Plan for CSAH 101 ProjectSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4.Prepared By Jason Wedel, Public Works Director/CityEngineer File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the Wetland Conservation Act Replacement Plan for the CSAH 101 Improvementsfrom Pioneer Trail to Flying Cloud Drive.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe City of Chanhassen is the Responsible Government Unit (RGU) for the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act(WCA). These are the state rules that regulate wetland impact and mitigation. In this capacity, decisions related toapprovals or denials of wetland mitigation and replacement applications are the purview of the City Council. Decisionsrelated to approvals or denials of wetland delineations and exemptions can be made at the staff level.The TH 101 Reconstruction project is before the City Council as the project involves 2.92 acres of permanentwetland impact that cannot be avoided or minimized more than the extent that it already has been. Therefore, theproject requires wetland mitigation. Replacement is proposed using the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR)Road Bank, which is allowed when wetland impacts occur with roadway projects that are being completed for safetyimprovements. There is no cost to the city to obtain BWSR Road Bank credits for eligible projects.DISCUSSIONThe TH 101 project is located between Pioneer Trail and Flying Cloud Drive. It is a Carver County project as part ofa turnback from MnDOT. The project involves 1.2 miles of safety and capacity improvements in this area withstraightening curves, improving site lines, and improving the road from a twolane undivided roadway to a fourlanedivided roadway with turn lanes at key intersections. A paved trail is also proposed adjacent to the road to connectexisting regional trails. Stormwater management improvements will also be made with the project.The city is both the applicant and the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) for the WCA. A complete application wassubmitted to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) on July 8, 2019. Prior to that submittal, a meeting with the TEP washeld on May 14, 2019 to review the wetland delineation and to discuss the overall project. The application was open to agency and public comment through August 9, 2019. BWSR did receive questions during the comment period which were all addressed. Attached is the WCA Notice of Decision which contains the findings of the project. The project includes 2.92 acres of permanent wetland impact which require mitigation at a 2:1 ratio. The project is eligible for BWSR Road Bank replacement and the TEP concurred with this finding. Therefore, the project is in conformance with the requirements of the WCA and staff recommends approval of the CSAH 101 Wetland Replacement Application. ATTACHMENTS: Notice of Decision TH 101 Wetland Permit Application BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) City of Chanhassen Address 7700 Market Boulevard, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name City of Chanhassen Project Name TH 101 Reconstruction (CSAH 14 to CSAH 61) Date of Application 7/8/2019 Application Number Attach site locator map. Type of Decision: Wetland Boundary or Type No-Loss Exemption Sequencing Replacement Plan Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation (if any): Approve Approve with conditions Deny Summary (or attach): 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 8/30/2019 Approved Approved with conditions (include below) Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): The TH 101 project is located between CSAH 14 and CSAH 61. It is a Carver County project as part of a turnback from MnDOT. The project involves 1.2 miles of safety and capacity improvements in this area with straightening curves, improving site lines, and improving the road from a two-lane undivided roadway to a four-lane divided roadway with turn lanes at key intersections. A paved trail is also proposed adjacent to the road to connect existing regional trails. Stormwater management improvements will also be made with the project. The City is both the applicant and the LGU for the WCA. A complete application was submitted to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) on July 8, 2019. Prior to that submittal, a meeting with the TEP was held on May 14, 2019 to review the wetland delineation and to discuss the overall project. The application was open to agency and public comment through August 9, 2019. BWSR had questions during the comment period which were addressed. The project includes 2.92 acres of permanent wetland impact which require mitigation at a 2:1 ratio. 0.14 acres of wet ditch impacts are incidental and do not require mitigation. The project is eligible for BWSR Road Bank replacement and the TEP concurred with this finding. The TEP signature pages are attached. Therefore, the project is in conformance with the requirements of WCA. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account # Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: Financial Assurance: For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR “Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants” and “Consent to Replacement Wetland” forms have been filed with the county recorder’s office in which the replacement wetland is located. Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Jason Wedel Title Public Works Director/City Engineer Signature Date 8/30/2019 Phone Number and E-mail 952.227.1169 JWedel@ci.chanhassen.mn.us THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal , the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send petition and $ fee (if applicable) to: Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send petition and $500 filing fee to: Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES SWCD TEP member: Aaron Finke; afinke@co.carver.mn.us BWSR TEP member: Ben Carlson; ben.carlson@state.mn.us LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): Andi Moffatt; amoffatt@wsbeng.com DNR TEP member: Becky Horton; becky.horton@state.mn.us DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member) WD or WMO (if applicable): Linda Loomis; naiadconsulting@gmail.com; Della Young; della@youngecg.com; Terry Jeffery; tjeffery@rpbcwd.org Applicant and Landowner (if different) Members of the public who requested notice: Jason Wedel (Applicant); JWedel@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Tim Smith (BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator); tim.j.smith@state.mn.us Jamie Hyslop (USACE PM); Jamie.R.Hyslop@usace.army.mil Jon Horn; jon.horn@kimley-horn.com Corps of Engineers Project Manager BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan decisions only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢ For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA_areas.pdf ➢ For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR_TEP_contacts.pdf ➢ Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE Bemidji, MN 56601 NE Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 1201 E. Hwy. 2 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 Central Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South New Ulm, MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr_regions.pdf ➢ For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 ➢ For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: TEP Signature Pages Wetland Permit Application TH 101 (CSAH 14 to CSAH 61) – 012363-000 PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf , the agent’s contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Jason Wedel, City of Chanhassen Mailing Address: 7700 Market Boulevard, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: 952-227-1169 E-mail Address: jwedel@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: WSB (Matt Unmacht) Mailing Address: 701 Xenia Avenue S., Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Phone: 763-762-2853 E-mail Address: MUnmacht@wsbeng.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Carver City/Township: Chanhassen Parcel ID and/or Address: Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): S25, 26, 35, 36 T116N, R23W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): Lat: 44.812834 Long: -93.539549 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): Approximately 6400 linear feet (1.212 miles) If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. This project involves 1.2 miles of safety and capacity improvements along Trunk Highway (TH) 101 between Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) and Flying Cloud Drive (CSAH 61) in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. The project includes reconstruction and realignment of TH 101 from a two-lane undivided roadway to a four-lane divided roadway with turn lanes at key intersections. A paved multi-use trail is proposed along both sides of TH 101 from Pioneer Trail to Creekwood Drive and along the east side only from Creekwood Drive to CSAH 61. The trail will connect to existing trails along TH 101 north of Pioneer Trail and south of CSAH 61, and to the Hennepin County Regional Trail Corridor that intersects with TH 101 south of Lakota Lane. A trail will also be placed along the north side of CSAH 61 and will cross Bluff Creek. No impacts to the creek are anticipated. On the south end, the roadway will connect to a roundabout that currently exists at the intersection of Flying Cloud Drive and T H 101. The project will include 0.14 acres of impact to lateral ditches along the corridor. This is due to the addition of two lanes and widening of shoulders along the corridor. Additionally, 0.06 acres of Wetland 1 and 0.03 acres of Wetland 2 will be impacted, also due to lane addition and shoulder widening. Lastly, 2.83 acres of Wetland 3 will be impacted to construct the roundabout connection at the intersection of TH 101 and Flying Cloud Drive and the construction of a stormwater pond within Wetland 3. The project will include 0.07 acres of impact to a stormwater pond located just north of Wetland 3. It is our understanding that this stormwater pond was created from upland and should be considered incidental (see below). The corridor was delineated by Kimley-Horn in May 2015 and the wetland boundary and types were approved on September 24, 2015, under City application 2015-05. This wetland boundary was set to expire in 2020. Project construction for TH 101 is anticipated to occur in 2020. Because of this expiration, WSB co mpleted a site visit and wetland reverification of the approved boundaries in October 2018. The site review concluded that the wetland boundaries were determined to still be accurate, and a Notice of Decision was issued on December 21, 2018. As such, the a pproved wetland boundaries now expire in 2023. One area from the original wetland delineation report, Wetland 3 on the Paws and Claws site, could only be delineated via a Level 1 desktop review in 2015 due to access constraints at the site. As such, that area needed to be field verified in spring 2019 when the site could be accessed. On April 19, 2019, WSB conducted a Level 2 on -site wetland delineation of the area. This area was approved by the LGU and TEP, and a Notice of Decision was issued on June 11, 2019. Both the December 2018 and June 2019 Notices of Decision can be found in Appendix A. PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact1 Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Resource ID (as noted on overhead view) Aquatic Resource Type (wetland, lake, tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)1 Size of Impact2 Overall Size of Aquatic Resource 3 Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area4 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Area5 Wetland 1 Wetland Fill P 0.06 ac (2695.44 sf) Type 2 – Fresh wet meadow Carver, 33, 9 Wetland 2 Wetland Fill P 0.03 ac (1331.07 sf) Type 2 – Fresh wet meadow Carver, 33, 9 Wetland 3 Wetland Fill P 1.63 ac (70,837 sf) Type 1/3/6 – Seasonally flooded basin/Shallow marsh/Shrub swamp Carver, 33, 9 Wetland 3 Wetland Excavation P 1.2 ac (52,272 sf) Type 1/3/6 – Seasonally flooded basin/Shallow marsh/Shrub swamp Carver, 33, 9 Stormwater Pond Stormwater pond Fill P 0.07 ac (2934.30 sf) Type 1 – Seasonally flooded basin Carver, 33, 9 Various wet ditches Lateral ditch Fill P 0.14 ac (6287.46 sf) N/A Carver, 33, 9 1If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the “T”. For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered “T (220)”. 2Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter “N/A”. 4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: NA PART FIVE: Applicant Signature Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. 1 The term “impact” as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. TH 101 (CSAH 14 to CSAH 61) – 012363-000 Attachment C Avoidance and Minimization Project Purpose, Need, and Requirements. Clearly state the purpose of your project and need for your project. Also include a description of any specific requirements of the project as they relate to project location, project footprint, water management, and any other applicable requirements. Attach an overhead plan sheet showing all relevant features of the project (buildings, roads, etc.), aquatic resource features (impact areas noted) and construction details (grading plans, storm water management plans, etc.), referencing these as necessary: The project involves reconstruction and realignment of TH 101 from Pioneer Trail to Flying Cloud Drive for approximately 1.2 miles in the City of Chanhassen. The road is being turned back by MnDOT to the County and the City is leading the project. The roadway is currently a two-lane undivided roadway without turn lanes, and is being designed to a four-lane divided roadway with turn lanes at key intersections. The existing roadway has over 10 percent grades with sharp horizontal curves. The speed limit through this section of roadway is 40 miles per hour (mph). The annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume is approximately 6,500 vehicles per day (MnDOT 2008 counts). This section of roadway is generally rural with adjacent residential areas and open space. In 2009, MnDOT resurfaced this section of TH 101, however, this work did not address most of the safety or capacity issues along the corridor. There are numerous constraints on the project including steep grades/challenging topography, poor sight distances and blind intersections. The roadway has many blind driveways and sharp curves. The section of roadway down the bluff is steep and treacherous especially during inclement weather. Numerous accidents have occurred on this section of roadway, and as the city and the region develop, increased traffic and accidents are expected to occur on this corridor. Additionally, this project is necessary because it is a subsequent stage of an earlier project. In 2013, the section of TH 101 between Pioneer Trail and Lyman Boulevard was reconstructed to improve safety, capacity, and connectivity issues on TH 101. This project included adding two additional lanes of traffic along with a median, turn lanes, a mixed-use trail, and curb and gutter. It also modified the road grade to flatten the horizontal and vertical curves. Reconstructing TH 101 between Pioneer Trail and Flying Cloud Drive, as this application proposes, will bring consistency and continuity to the corridor, and allow for steady flow to traffic and a safer corridor as a whole. The project will include the construction of a stormwater pond, located at the south end of the project. This pond i s necessary solely for the purpose of treating stormwater runoff from the additional impervious due to the new road , and not for any future development. The pond will be constructed by excavating roughly 5000 cubic yards from Wetland 3 and will be 1.2 acres in size. This will result in impacting 2.83 acres of Wetland 3. Additionally, a new stormwater outlet will be installed at Wetland 2. The existing outlet invert elevation is 913.6 and the proposed invert elevation is 913.8. This new outlet will result in a 10- year High Water Level that is a few inches lower than existing, but no-change for the 2-year High Water Level. As such, this outlet is not anticipated to impact hydrology at Wetland 2. See Table 1 below for more info. Table 1. Niemela Wetland – HWLs Event/Outlet Existing Proposed 2 914.1 914.1 10 914.6 914.3 100 915.4 914.9 Outlet Invert 913.6 913.8 Outlet Type Weir/Channel Structure EOF 915.8 915.5 Avoidance. Both the CWA and the WCA require that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives exist. Clearly describe all on-site measures considered to avoid impacts to aquatic resources and d iscuss at least two project alternatives that avoid all impacts to aquatic resources on the site. These alternatives may include alternative site plans, alternate sites, and/or not doing the project. Alternatives should be feasible and prudent (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2 C). Applicants are encouraged to attach drawings and plans to support their analysis: No Build Alternative – The No Build Alternative was reviewed and would have avoided all impacts to wetlands and wet ditches. However, this alternative would not have addressed the project purpose and need, which is to steep grades, challenging topography, poor site distances, and blind intersections. As a result, this alternative was rejected. Design Alternative 1 – In 2015, a preliminary design alternative that was considered was the construction of stormwater pond within Wetland 4, which is located in the northwest portion of the project area, at the northwest intersection of Trunk Highway 101 and Pioneer Trail. This stormwater pond would have treated drainage from the roadway and would have resulte d in 0.24 acres more wetland impacts. This alternative can be found in Appendix C. Due to this increase in wetland impacts, this alternative was rejected. Instead, water is being routed to the south, to an existing stormwater pond. Despite increasing storm sewer costs, this chosen alternative will not result in additional wetland impacts. Minimization. Both the CWA and the WCA require that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest extent practicable. Discuss all features of the proposed project that have been modified to minimize the impacts to water resources (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 4): All unavoidable impacts to wetlands and aquatic resources have been minimized to the greatest ext ent possible. A cul-de-sac is proposed for construction near the intersection of TH 101 and Creekwood Drive. Originally, the cul-de-sac was designed to be placed through the entirety of Wetland 2. This would have resulted in filling a significant portion of Wetland 2 and approximately 0.38 acres of additional impact. This design was minimized because of these additional wetland impacts. Instead, the cul-de-sac was reduced in size and relocated to the upland area adjacent to Wetland 2 at the intersection of TH 101 and Creekwood Drive. This minimization only resulted in 0.03 acres of wetland impacts. This was also a part of the 2015 preliminary design and can be found Appendix C. Off-Site Alternatives. An off-site alternatives analysis is not required for all permit applications. If you know that your proposal will require an individual permit (standard permit or letter of permission) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you may be required to provide an off-site alternatives analysis. The alternatives analysis is not required for a complete application but must be provided during the review process in order for the Corps to complete the evaluation of your application and reach a final decision. Applicants with questions about when an off-site alternatives analysis is required should contact their Corps Project Manager. An off-site alternatives analysis is not required for this project as it would not meet the project purpose and need. TH 101 (CSAH 14 to CSAH 61) – 012363-000 Attachment E Local Road Replacement Program Qualification Complete this part if you are a local road authority (county highway department, city transportation department, etc.) seeking verification that your project (or a portion of your project) qualifies for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement Program (LGRWRP). If portions of your project are not eligible for the LGRWRP, then Attachment D should be completed and attached to your application. Discuss how your project is a repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of a currently serviceable road to meet state/federal design or safety standards/requirements. Applicants should identify the specific road deficiencies and ho w the project will rectify them. Attach supporting documents and information as applicable: The TH 101 corridor has several major safety concerns based on its current design. The tables above show that the Total Crash Rate has a Critical Index of 2.67, which is significantly higher than the Critical Crash Rate of 1.00. Additionally, the obse rved Fatal and Serious Injury Crash Rate is 4.31, which nearly quadruple the Statewide Average of 1.23. Steep grades (up to 13 percent) and numerous curves along the roadway necessitate warning signs with 15 mph advisory speeds, and difficult travel conditions are caused by slick pavement during inclement weather. Inadequate sight distances create blind intersections with roadways, driveways, and a trial crossing. A crash analysis performed as part of the 2007 Corridor Scoping , Environmental Screening and Preliminary Design Study Report identified crash and severity rates more than twice the average for two-lane rural highways. The predominant crash type was “run -off-the-road,” a symptom of poor sight conditions, tight curves, and undulating terrain through the project area. The proposed TH 101 improvements will create safer driving conditions for users of this highway. Additional 10-Year (2006-2015) Crash Data can be found in Appendix B. Provide a map, plan, and/or aerial photograph accurately depicting wetland boundaries within the project area. Attach associated delineation/determination report or otherwise explain the method(s) used to identify and delineate wetlands. Also attach and discuss any type of review or approval of wetland boundaries or other aspects of the project by a member or members of the local Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) or Corps of Engineers: Incidental Wetlands “Incidental wetlands” are wetland areas that the applicant can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the local government unit, were created in non-wetland areas solely by actions, the purpose of which was not to create the wetland. Incidental wetlands include drainage ditches, impoundments, or excavations constructed in non -wetland areas solely for the purpose of effluent treatment, containment of waste material, storm water retention or detention, drainage, soil and water conservation practices, and water quality improvements and not as part of a wetland replacement process that may, over time, take on wetland characteristics. Based on a review of soils data, site topography, and historical available aerial imagery, WSB believes that the private stormwater pond located on the Paws and Claws site was created for purposes other than to create a wetland and should be considered incidental. No as-built could be obtained for this location. This stormwater pond is entirely within the Terril loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, soil type, which has a 10 percent hydric rating, which is classified as predominantly non-hydric. The Technical Evaluation Panel visited this stormwater pond in the field and agreed that this was an incidental wetland. This application is a request for official concurrence that this stormwater pond is incidental. In the table below, identify only the wetland impacts from Part 4 that the road authority has determined should qualify for the LGRWRP. Wetland Impact Figures can be found in Appendix C. Wetland Impact ID (as noted on overhead view) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain) Size of Impact (square feet or acres to 0.01) Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area1 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact2 Wetland 1 Fill 0.06 ac (2695.44 sf) Type 2 – Fresh wet meadow Carver, 33, 9 Wetland 2 Fill 0.03 ac (1331.07 sf) Type 2 – Fresh wet meadow Carver, 33, 9 Wetland 3 Fill 1.63 ac (70837.68 sf) Type 1/3/6 – Seasonally flooded basin/Shallow marsh/Shrub swamp Carver, 33, 9 Wetland 3 Excavate 1.2 ac (52272 sf) Type 1/3/6 – Seasonally flooded basin/Shallow marsh/Shrub swamp Carver, 33, 9 Various wet ditches Fill 0.14 ac (6287.46 sf) N/A Carver, 33, 9 1Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 2Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. Discuss the feasibility of providing onsite compensatory mitigation/replacement for important site-specific wetland functions: On-site compensatory mitigation/replacement is not feasible for the following reasons: 1. After improvements, the width of open space (lateral of the toe-of-road slope) will be limited to the existing remainder of right-of-way, which is not conducive to support and maintain a site-specific wetland mitigation. 2. The function of compensatory mitigation located very close to the road would be limited, and subject to salt and sand runoff from winter road treatments. Compensatory mitigation located very close to the road would not provide quality wildlife habitat because of traffic disturbance. 3. The cost of securing additional right-of-way, designing, engineering, and protecting the compensatory wetland mitigation at the site would not be cost effective. Technical Evaluation Panel Concurrence: TH 101 (CSAH 14 to CSAH 61) – 012363-000 TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement p rogram? Yes No Signature: _________________________________________ Date: TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement p rogram? Yes No Signature: _________________________________________ Date: TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? Yes No Signature: _________________________________________ Date: TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement p rogram? Yes No Signature: _________________________________________ Date: Upon approval and signature by the TEP, application must be sent to: Wetland Bank Administration Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North Saint Paul, MN 55155 Appendix A December 2018 Notice of Decision Documents May 2019 Notice of Decision Documents 540 Gateway Boulevard | Suite 100 | Burnsville, MN 55337 | (952) 737-4660 Building a legacy – your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer | wsbeng.com K:\012363-000\Admin\Docs\Wetland\MEMO - 110818 - poehment - Wetland Boundary Review Memorandum.docx Memorandum To: Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen From: Dustin Simonson (WDC ID# 1303), WSB Andi Moffatt (WDC ID# 1034), WSB Date: November 8, 2018 Re: TH101 Wetland Delineation Boundary Verification WSB Project No. 012363-000 The City of Chanhassen has consulted with WSB & Associates to reverify the approved wetland boundary located along TH 101 - CSAH 14 to CSAH 16 roadway. This area was delineated and approved on September 24, 2015 under application 2015-05. This wetland boundary approval is set to expire in 2020. Project construction for TH 101 is anticipated to occur in 2020 with design occurring in 2018/2019. Dustin Simonson of WSB & Associates did a site visit of the TH 101 project corridor on October 11, 2018 to verify the wetland boundary as described in the TH 101 – CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 wetland delineation report completed by Kimley-Horn. After reviewing the site, it was determined that no major disturbances occurred to the area or to the hydrologic scheme of the area. Based on this, the wetland boundaries were reviewed and determined to still be accurate. Based on these findings, WSB, on behalf of the City of Chanhassen, would like to apply for the approval of the wetland boundary as depicted in the TH 101 – CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Wetland Delineation Report (attached) and approved in the under-application number 2015-05 (attached). In addition to the previously delineated project area, two additional areas were reviewed for wetlands while on site. Area 1 was determined to have wetland characteristics. This area is located north of the original project corridor in the northeast corner of the intersection of Pioneer Trail and TH 101. This area was dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) with the boundary being located at the toe of slope along the road shoulder providing a sharp contrast in the topography depicting the boundary between the wetland and upland. Refer to attached Figure 1 for the wetland boundary of the new area. This area was delineated by Kimley-Horn but not included in the original TH 101 – CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Wetland Delineation Report. Area 2 is located west of the intersection of Lakota Lane and Great Plains Boulevard (Figure 2). This area had steep slopes leading to a channelized ditch outside of the City owned parcel. No wetlands were found within this area and this area was also not noted as wetland in the original delineation report. If you have questions, please feel free to call one of us at 763-541-4800. Pioneer Tr Great Plains BlvdF o x Ho ll o w Dr Pineview Ct Delphinium LaHalla Nursery Dr W Raspberry Hill0 250Feet¯Figure 1 - Area 1 InvestigationTH101 Wetland Delineation ReviewCity of Chanhassen 1 inch = 250 f eet Document Path: K:\012363-000\GIS\Maps\Figure 2.mxd Date Saved: 10/29/2018 2:43:30 PMArea of Investigation Wetland Boundary TH 1 01_CSAH 14-61_Delineated_W etlands Great Plains BlvdC r e e k w o o d D r Lakota LaMandan CirVogelsburg Tr 0 250Feet¯Figure 2 - Area 2 InvestigationTH101 Wetland Delineation ReviewCity of Chanhassen 1 inch = 250 f eet Document Path: K:\012363-000\GIS\Maps\Figure 2.mxd Date Saved: 10/29/2018 2:43:30 PMArea of Investigation Flow channel Wetland Boundary TH 1 01_CSAH 14-61_Delineated_W etlands WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT TH101 - CSAH 14 TO CSAH 61 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Prepared for: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N St. Paul, MN 55114 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. JULY 2015 | FINAL THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 TH 101 from CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 │ Wetland Delineation Report July 2015 Year │ City of Chanhassen TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 Site Location ........................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 Project Description .................................................................................................................. 3 4.0 Purpose of the Delineation ...................................................................................................... 3 5.0 Site Description ....................................................................................................................... 3 6.0 Preliminary Delineation ........................................................................................................... 3 7.0 Field Investigation ................................................................................................................... 4 8.0 Wetland and Upland Area Characteristics .............................................................................. 4 9.0 Regulatory Requirements ....................................................................................................... 7 10.0 Report Preparation ................................................................................................................ 7 11.0 References ............................................................................................................................ 8 FIGURES Figure 1. Project Vicinity Figure 2. Project Limits Figure 3. USGS 7.5 Minute Topographical Map Figure 4a-c. Delineated Wetland Boundaries APPENDICES Appendix A. National Wetlands Inventory Appendix B. Hydric Soils Information Appendix C. Precipitation Data Appendix D. MN DNR Public Waters Inventory Appendix E. Field Data Sheets Appendix F. Site Photos TH 101 CSAH 14-61 │ Wetland Delineation Report July 2015 │ City of Chanhassen 2 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Wetland scientists Ashley Payne, CWD (#1259) and Aaron Stolte with Kimley-Horn (K-H) conducted a wetland investigation and delineation for the TH101 Improvements project from CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 in City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. The site investigation and delineation occurred on May 19th, 2015. During the investigation, fifteen areas were reviewed, with four areas delineated as wetland and eleven areas were delineated as wetland ditches. WETLANDS AND WETLAND DITCHES  Delineated Wetlands (Level 2 – Onsite Delineation) o Wetland 1 was delineated as Type 2—Fresh Wet Meadow wetland. The wetland was located in a depressional area located on the east side of TH101. A portion of this wetland is located within existing TH 101 right-of-way and the rest is located within the adjacent golf course. o Wetland 2 was delineated as a Type 1—Seasonally Flooded Basin/Type 2—Fresh Wet Meadow wetland. The wetland was located in a depressional area in the southwest quadrant of the Creekwood Drive and TH 101 intersection. Adjacent to the wetland was a drainage channel connecting the wetland to the east side of the TH 101 through a culvert under TH 101. o Wetland 4 was previously delineated in 2012 during the TH 101 from CSAH 18 to CSAH 14 Roadway Reconstruction Project. This wetland is located north of CSAH 14 and west of TH 101. o Wetland 5 was delineated as Type 1—Seasonally Flooded Basin. The wetland was located in a depressional area within an agricultural field. This wetland contains a functioning draintile inlet and system.  Delineated Wetlands (Level 1 – Estimated Wetland Boundaries) o Wetland 3 was a Type 2 – Fresh Meadow/Type 3 – Shallow Marsh wetland observed along CSAH 61. A Level 1 delineation was completed for this wetland; Kimley-Horn was denied access to this private property during the field delineation. Some data was obtained for this wetland from the consultant performing an archeological investigation on the property. The southern edge of the property was delineated in September 2012 and was used in the Level 1 assessment.  Delineated Wetland Ditches (Level 2 – Onsite Delineation) o Eleven (11) wetland ditches (Wetland Ditch A-K) were delineated as Type 2 – Wet Meadwo wetlands. These areas were typical rural roadside ditches that collect roadway run-off and convey it to the adjacent ravines. 3 TH101 CSAH 14-61 │ Wetland Delineation Report July 2015 │ City of Chanhassen 2.0 SITE LOCATION The TH101 from CSAH 14 to 61 Roadway Improvement project is located in the city of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota (Section 25 and 36, Township 116, Range 23). The project includes a segment of roadway that is a currently a rural 2-lane roadway with tight curves and blind access points. TH 101 drops down the bluff to the Minnesota River Valley. 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The roadway is currently a 2-lane undivided rural highway section. The segment of TH 101 north was upgraded in 2013 to a 4-lane divided highway so this is the only remaining 2-lane undivided rural section of TH 101 from TH 212 to CSAH 61. The proposed project is to reconstruct the roadway into a safer four- lane divided highway with both rural and urban sections and a trail along the east side of the roadway. The project study area is depicted in Figure 2. 4.0 PURPOSE OF THE DELINEATION This delineation is intended to identify the extent of wetlands and potential waters of the US within the project study area. The information will be used to facilitate project design and to determine if wetland impacts are avoidable and/or if minimization of wetland impacts can result from design modifications. 5.0 SITE DESCRIPTION Land use within and adjacent to the project study area includes roadway right-of-way, commercial, residential, agricultural, parkland, and a golf course. The ground surface elevation ranged from 932 feet to 730 feet above mean sea level as the roadway drops down the Minnesota River Valley Bluffs. 6.0 PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION Prior to field reconnaissance, potential wetland areas within the project study area were identified though a desktop review of National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping, aerial photography (2013), DNR Public Waters Inventory (PWI), site topography, and the soil survey for Carver County. NWI mapping, maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, identified three wetlands within the project study area (Appendix A). According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service’s (NRCS) Web Soil Survey, two soil-mapping units within the project study area were considered hydric (Cordova-Webster complex, Glencoe clay loam). Maps and information obtained from the NRCS online web survey are included in Appendix B. The Carver County, Minnesota 7.5-minute topographic map (U.S. Geological Survey) shows no wetlands within the project study area (Figure 3). Precipitation data for the project study area was obtained from an online data retrieval system created and maintained by the Climatology Working Group at the University of Minnesota (available at http://climate.umn.edu/doc/historical.htm). This information was used to determine if the climatic/hydrologic conditions were typical for this time of year. Rainfall levels for the three months (February, March, and April) leading up to the May 19th field investigation were compared to historical data. The data shows that February and March were drier than normal and April had normal precipitation levels. This information is included in Appendix C. TH 101 CSAH 14-61 │ Wetland Delineation Report July 2015 │ City of Chanhassen 4 The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters Inventory Map (PWI) was reviewed. One DNR Public Water was identified within the project study area (Bluff Creek). The inventory map is included in Appendix D. 7.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION Wetland scientists, Ashley Payne (CWD #1259) and Aaron Stolte with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (K-H), conducted a field investigation and wetland delineation on May 19, 2015. A routine level 2 wetland delineation, as outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (USACE) along with the Midwest Regional Supplement was performed for all wetlands within the project study limits except for Wetland 3. A Level 1 delineation was completed for Wetland 3, as K-H did not have access to that private property to complete an on-site field review. During the Level 2 delineation, vegetation, soils, and hydrologic characteristics were evaluated at each potential wetland area within the project study area. A transect, including at least one upland and one wetland sample point, was completed and documented for each area identified as wetland. One transect was completed for the roadside wetland ditches as the conditions and upland to wetland transition was similar throughout the corridor. The sample point locations and wetland boundaries were surveyed with a Trimble GPS and are shown in Figures 4a-c. Since the project is in the pre-planning stage and the majority of wetlands were located on private property, flags were not placed along the boundaries. The field data sheets are included in Appendix E. Site photos for the delineation wetlands are located in Appendix F. 8.0 WETLAND AND UPLAND AREA CHARACTERISTICS The field investigation delineated four wetlands and eleven wetland ditches within the project study area. A summary of the field investigation is below. 8.1 WETLAND 1 Wetland 1 was a depressional area located on the east side of TH101 adjacent to a golf course. A wetland ditch (Wetland Ditch C) connects to the west side of the wetland. The preliminary investigation showed this area was not identified on NWI mapping nor had hydric soil, as noted on the County Soil Survey. However, aerial photography revealed potential inundation and wetland vegetation in the area. Two sample points were completed for the area; sample point C-1 within the wetland and C-2, which was 15 feet to the north and 2-feet upslope from the wetland sample point. Wetland 1 was delineated as a Type 2—Fresh Wet Meadow. Eighteen (18) points were surveyed along the boundary of the wetland. The wetland boundary was based on the distinct change in topography and the vegetation transition from foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum) and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) to smooth brome (Bromis inermis) The dominant vegetation at sample point C-1 was solely foxtail barley in the herbaceous stratum. Sample point C-1 met hydrophytic vegetation criteria. The dominant vegetation at sample point C-2 was smooth brome (Bromis inermis) in the herbaceous stratum. The vegetation at C-2 did not meet criteria to be considered hydrophytic vegetation. The soil profile at sample points C-1 and C-2 met the hydric soil field indicator F6 (redox dark surface). 5 TH101 CSAH 14-61 │ Wetland Delineation Report July 2015 │ City of Chanhassen Sample point C-1 had saturation at the surface, meeting hydrology indicator A3 (saturation), confirming presence of hydrology. Sample Point C-2 did not meet any hydrology field indicators. 8.2 WETLAND 2 Wetland 2 was a depressional area located in the southwest quadrant of TH101 and Creekwood Drive. A small drainage channel connected the wetland to a culvert under TH 101 to the east side of the roadway. The preliminary investigation shows this area as a Freshwater Emergent Wetland (PEM1A) according to NWI mapping and had hydric soil (Cordova-Webster complex), as noted in the County Soil Survey. Two sample points were completed for the area; sample point A-1 was located along the eastern edge of the wetland and sample point A-2 was taken approximately 20 feet northeast and 2-feet upslope from Sample Point A-1. Wetland 2 was delineated as a Type 2—Fresh Wet Meadow. Twenty-two (22) points were surveyed along the boundary of the wetland. The wetland boundary was based on the change in topography and vegetation transition from reed canary grass and giant goldenrod (Solidago gigantaea) to a more dominant presence of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis). The dominant vegetation at sample point A-1 was Kentucky bluegrass in the herbaceous stratum. Vegetation met the dominance test; therefore, met hydrophytic vegetation criteria. The dominant vegetation at sample point A-2 was also Kentucky bluegrass in the herbaceous stratum. Sample point A-2 also had hydrophytic vegetation. The sample points at A-1 and A-2 both met hydric soil indicator A12 (thick dark surface). Sample point A-1 met hydrology indicator D2 (geomorphic position) and D5 (FAC-Neutral Test). Sample point A-2 only met one secondary indicator, D5 (FAC-Neutral Test); therefore did not meet wetland hydrology criteria. 8.4 WETLAND 3 Wetland 3 was a Type 2 – Fresh Meadow/Type 3 – Shallow Marsh wetland observed along CSAH 61. A Level 1 delineation was completed for this wetland as Kimley-Horn was denied access to this private property during the field delineation so the wetland boundary was estimated based on a level 1 (desktop review) and information obtained from others. Some data was obtained for this wetland from the consultant performing an archeological investigation on the property (Florin Cultural Resource Services, LLC (Florin CRS)). Based on the information obtained from Florin CRS, the soils were muck and sandy clay loam mineral soils with a water table present approximately 6-feet below the surface. Based photos of the vegetation, reed canary grass and cattails comprised the dominant vegetation. The southern edge of the property was delineated in September 2012 as part of the CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) roundabout project. The wetland area within the CSAH 61 right of way is permitted to be filled for the roundabout construction (permitted by both the City and USACE) as shown in Figure 4c). 8.5 WETLAND 4 Wetland 4, as identified in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet, was delineated during the TH 101 from CSAH 18 to CSAH 14 Roadway Reconstruction project in 2011. This wetland is located north of CSAH 14 and west of TH 101. TH 101 CSAH 14-61 │ Wetland Delineation Report July 2015 │ City of Chanhassen 6 8.6 WETLAND 5 Wetland 5 was a depressional area within an agricultural field. The preliminary investigation showed the area was not identified as wetland on NWI mapping, but had hydric soil (Glencoe clay loam), according to the County Soil Survey. Two sample points were completed for the area; sample point B-1 was located at the lowest point of the basin and sample point B-2 about 25 feet southwest and 2 to 3-feet upslope from B-1. The agricultural field had a draintile inlet located in the northeast corner of the wetland, which was also in the lowest part of the basin. Due to this area containing drain tile and within an agricultural field, a historic aerial review of the area was completed. Surveyd boundaries were determined to be accurate based on historical aerial review. Wetland 5 was delineated as Type 1—Seasonally Flooded Basin. Nine (9) points were surveyed along the wetland boundary. The wetland boundary was based on a change in topography and vegetative transition from spike rush (eleocharis palustris) to orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), red clover (Trifolium pretense), and white clover (Trifolium repens). The dominant vegetation at sample point B-1 included spike rush, white clover, and orchard grass in the herbaceous stratum. Vegetation at B-1 did not meet the dominance test, however did meet the prevalence index; therefore was considered hydrophytic. The dominant vegetation at sample point B-2 included orchard grass, white clover, and red clover in the herbaceous stratum. Sample point B-2 did not meet hydrophytic vegetation criteria. The sample points at B-1 and B-2 both met hydric soil indicator F6 (redox dark surface). Sample point B-1 met hydrology indicator D2 (geomorphic position) and D5 (FAC-Neutral Test). Sample point B-2 met no primary or secondary hydrology field indicators. 8.7 WETLAND DITCHES Several wet ditches were identified along the existing rural roadway segment. No wetland diches were located in areas identified on NWI mapping nor located within a hydric soil map unit. Sample points E-1 and E-2 were representative of all ditched identified and all were delineated as Type 2 – Wet Meadow wetlands. Boundaries are depicted in Figure 4a-c. Sample point E-1 was located in the middle of a ditch segment and sample point E-2 was located 10 feet west and three feet upslope from E-1. The wetland ditch boundaries were based on a change in topography and the vegetation transition from reed canary grass and cattails (Typha angustifolia) to upland species such as smooth brome and common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale).  Wetland Ditch A was located along the west side of TH 101 and was a typical roadside drainage ditch conveying roadway run-off along the roadway.  Wetland Ditch B was located along the west side of TH101.  Wetland Ditch C was located adjacent to Wetland 1 and had a distinct channel that separated the wetland ditch from the adjacent wetland basin.  Wetland Ditch D was located west of TH101 in the southwest quadrant of Bramble Drive and TH101.  Wetland Ditch E was located just south of Wetland Ditch D adjacent to TH101.  Wetland Ditch F was located west of TH101 on the opposite side of a roadway from a large ravine. 7 TH101 CSAH 14-61 │ Wetland Delineation Report July 2015 │ City of Chanhassen  Wetland Ditch G was located adjacent to the south of Wetland Ditch F and to the west of TH101.  Wetland Ditch H was located on east of TH101 on the opposite side of the roadway from Wetland Ditch A.  Wetland Ditch I was located adjacent to Wetland 2 on the west side of TH101.  Wetland Ditch J was located across the TH101 and Creekwood Drive intersection.  Wetland Ditch K was located adjacent to the northeast of the intersection of TH101 and Lakota Lane. 8.8 POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE US Potential waters of the US were identified during the wetland delineation. These areas were ravine/drainage areas that appeared to have intermittent flow and appeared to convey water away from the TH 101 project area. These areas can be found on Figures 2 and 4a-C. Bluff Creek was also identified during the field review. This creek consisted of only the creek channel with not adjacent wetland. 9.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS The following provides a general summary of the permit requirements that may pertain to the TH101 from CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Improvements Project. Any activity planned within areas identified as wetland must be coordinated with and approved by the appropriate agencies prior to commencement of such activities. Agencies representing the levels of government in Minnesota regulate certain activities that affect lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands are listed below:  Federal – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE): Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.  Local – Local Government Units (LGU) (including cities, counties, watershed management organizations, soil and water conservation districts, and townships): Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). The City of Chanhassen is the LGU for this project. The regulatory authority of the USACE generally covers Waters of the United States, including those that are subject to WCA. Generally, the USACE reviews delineations to determine whether wetlands are jurisdictional (i.e., Waters of the United States). In Minnesota, a joint application process has been developed for projects with anticipated wetland impacts. Applications are coordinated between the USACE and the LGU. 10.0 REPORT PREPARATION The procedures followed for this wetland delineation are in accordance with the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (USACE 1987) and the Midwest Regional Supplement (USACE 2010). This report describes site conditions for a specific date-in-time, and is generally valid for a period of five years from the date of the final field investigation and delineation – May 19th, 2015 TH 101 CSAH 14-61 │ Wetland Delineation Report July 2015 │ City of Chanhassen 8 11.0 REFERENCES Climatology Working Group, University of Minnesota. Historical Climate Data Retrieval: Daily or Monthly Temperature, Precipitation, Snow Data by Target Location. Available at http://climate.umn.edu/doc/historical.htm, accessed July 2015. Minnesota Climatology Working Group. Historical Climate Data Retrieval: Wetland Delineation Monthly Precipitation Data Retrieval from Gridded Database. Available at http://climate.umn.edu/doc/historical.htm, accessed July 2015. Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. Information regarding Minnesota wetland regulations (includes links to other regulatory websites). Available at http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/index.html, accessed July 2015. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Protected Waters and Wetlands, Carver County, Minnesota. Public Waters Inventory Map. Available at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt_section/pwi/maps.html, accessed July 2015. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov, accessed July 2015. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87- 1. January 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0). August 2010. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Wetlands Online Mapper. National Wetland Inventory mapping. Available at http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html, accessed July 2015. Figures Project Location Rice Lake Riley Lake Chanhassen Shakopee Eden Prairie Jackson Chaska Chaska Bluff Creek Minnesota River Riley Creek A s s um p t i o n C r e e k Bluff Creek Riley CreekEsri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community 0 2,5001,250 Feet Legend Project Location County Boundaries Municipal Boundaries Streams Lakes °TH 101 Improvements from CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Figure 1. Project Vicinity Wetland Delineation Report TH 101 Improvements from CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Figure 2. Project Limits 0 600300 Feet Wetland Delineation Report Legend Project Study Area Delineated Wetland Boundaries Estimated Wetland Boundaries Delineated Wetland Ditches Potential Waters of the US (Identified during Field Review) NHD Streams ° 101 14 61 Legend Project Study Area TH 101 Improvements from CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Figure 3. USGS 7.5 MinuteTopographical Map°0 600300 Feet Wetland Delineation Report !(!( Wetland Ditch F Wetland Ditch B Wetland Ditch D Wetland Ditch E Wetland Ditch C Wetland Ditch G Wetland 1 SP-C2 SP-C1 0 200100 Feet Figure 4a. Delineated Wetland Boundaries TH 101 Improvements from CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Wetland Delineation Report Legend Delineated Wetland Boundaries Estimated Wetland Boundaries Delineated Wetland Ditches !(Sample Points Potential Waters of the US NHD Streams ° Drainage Ditch Connected to an Estimated Wetland Boundary !(!( !( !( !(!( Wetland 5 Wetland Ditch K Wetland Ditch H Wetland Ditch G Wetland Ditch J Wetland Ditch A Wetland Ditch I Wetland 2 SP-E2 SP-E1 SP-B2 SP-B1 SP-A2 SP-A1 0 200100 Feet Figure 4b. Delineated Wetland Boundaries TH 101 Improvements from CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Wetland Delineation Report Legend Delineated Wetland Boundaries Estimated Wetland Boundaries Delineated Wetland Ditches !(Sample Points Potential Waters of the US NHD Streams ° Delineated by SEH for Southwest Reconnection Project Wetland 3 0 200100 Feet Figure 4c. Delineated Wetland Boundaries TH 101 Improvements from CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Wetland Delineation Report Legend Delineated Wetland Boundaries Estimated Wetland Boundaries Delineated Wetland Ditches !(Sample Points Potential Waters of the US NHD Streams ° APPENDIX A National Wetlands Inventory 61 101 14 Flying Clo u d D r Lakota La Fox HCreekwood DrDelphinium LaRaspberry HillVogelsb u r g T r Pioneer Tr 0 600300 Feet °TH 101 Improvements - CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Appendix A. National Wetlands Inventory Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX B Hydric Soils Information Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Carver County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 1/27/2015 Page 1 of 64961800496210049624004962700496300049633004963600496390049618004962100496240049627004963000496330049636004963900456800457100457400457700458000458300 456800 457100 457400 457700 458000 458300 44° 49' 44'' N 93° 32' 54'' W44° 49' 44'' N93° 31' 31'' W44° 48' 25'' N 93° 32' 54'' W44° 48' 25'' N 93° 31' 31'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 500 1000 2000 3000 Feet 0 150 300 600 900 Meters Map Scale: 1:11,800 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons Hydric (100%) Hydric (66 to 99%) Hydric (33 to 65%) Hydric (1 to 32%) Not Hydric (0%) Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines Hydric (100%) Hydric (66 to 99%) Hydric (33 to 65%) Hydric (1 to 32%) Not Hydric (0%) Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points Hydric (100%) Hydric (66 to 99%) Hydric (33 to 65%) Hydric (1 to 32%) Not Hydric (0%) Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Carver County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 16, 2014 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2012—Apr 6, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Carver County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 1/27/2015 Page 2 of 6 Hydric Rating by Map Unit Hydric Rating by Map Unit— Summary by Map Unit — Carver County, Minnesota (MN019) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AE Hawick loamy sand, 18 to 40 percent slopes 0 4.4 0.7% BH Blue Earth mucky silt loam 100 77.2 11.4% CO Cordova clay loam 98 19.2 2.8% CW Cordova-Webster complex 100 2.8 0.4% GL Glencoe clay loam 100 2.4 0.4% HM Hamel loam 95 1.8 0.3% KB Kilkenny-Lester loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes 0 75.1 11.1% KB2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded 0 116.1 17.1% KC Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes 0 17.6 2.6% KC2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded 0 42.2 6.2% KD Lester-Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes 0 1.9 0.3% KD2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded 0 0.8 0.1% KE2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded 0 22.0 3.3% KF Lester-Kilkenny loams, 25 to 40 percent slopes 0 194.2 28.6% KL Hanlon-Kalmarville complex, frequently flooded 45 16.1 2.4% KM Minneiska-Kalmarville complex, frequently flooded 40 11.7 1.7% LS Le Sueur loam 5 3.1 0.5% MN Minneiska loam 5 48.2 7.1% TB Terril loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes 10 0.7 0.1% Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Carver County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 1/27/2015 Page 3 of 6 Hydric Rating by Map Unit— Summary by Map Unit — Carver County, Minnesota (MN019) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI TC Terril loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes 10 20.2 3.0% Totals for Area of Interest 677.9 100.0% Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Carver County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 1/27/2015 Page 4 of 6 APPENDIX C Precipitation Data Minnesota Climatology Working Group State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home |current conditions | journal |past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | contact us | search | Nearest Station Precipitation Data Retrieval Minnesota's precipitation data archive is searched for data closest to a selected target location for each month. Values from the site closest to the target location are returned below after clicking the retrieve monthly data or retrieve daily data buttons. The precipitation data are made up of measured rainfall and the measured liquid content of snowfall. Temperature, snowfall, and snow depth data from National Weather Service reporting stations are no longer retrieved from this application. To obtain those data, see our newest data retrieval tool (May 2014). National Weather Service precipitation data continue to be available from this application. Obtaining data for legal purposes Guide for column headers in the data table target location: Carver-Lake minnewashta-Shakopee 116N 23W S36 (latitude: 44.81727 longitude: 93.53796) click to select target location years: 2015  to 2015  number of missing days allowed per month: 3 retrieve monthly data retrieve daily data results: Target: T116 R23 S36 mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn oooooooo pre (inches) dis Jan 2015 10 116N 23W 23 BYRG .24 1 mi. Feb 2015 10 116N 23W 23 BYRG .33 1 mi. Mar 2015 10 116N 23W 23 BYRG .85 1 mi. Apr 2015 10 116N 23W 23 BYRG 2.14 1 mi. May 2015 10 116N 23W 23 BYRG 4.34 1 mi. Jun 2015 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS 3.66 3 mi. Jul 2015 m 999 mi. Aug 2015 m 999 mi. Sep 2015 m 999 mi. Oct 2015 m 999 mi. Nov 2015 m 999 mi. Dec 2015 m 999 mi. Where indicated: Missing values are shown as 'm'. Days on which precip accumulated in the gage are shown as '-'. 'TTTT RR SS' is the 'public land survey(PLS)' or 'legal' location of the observed data. Section values greater 36 are SECTIC 'TIC' locations plus 100. 'NWS ID' the National Weather Service Cooperative station number. Note that the 'PLS' will always be correct for precipitation data while the 'NWS ID' will always be correct for the temperature data. If no PLS info is supplied the the 'NWS ID' number applies to all shown data. State Climatology Office - MnDNR - Ecological and Water Resources Page 1 of 1HIgh DENsity radius retrieval 071210 7/9/2015http://climate.umn.edu/HIDradius/radius_new.asp APPENDIX D MN DNR Public Waters Inventory 61 101 14 Flying Clo u d D r Lakota La Fox HCreekwood DrDelphinium LaRaspberry HillVogelsb u r g T r Pioneer Tr 0 600300 Feet TH 101 Improvements - CSAH 14 to CSAH 61 Appendix D. DNR Public Waters Investory Wetland Delineation Report° APPENDIX E Field Data Sheets Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):Ashley Payne, Aaron Stolte Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:City of Chanhassen State: hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: Y Cordova-Webster complex NWI Classification: 2 Lat:Long:44.81865 Datum:-93.537756 Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Absolute % Cover30' If yes, optional wetland site ID: Depressional area in the southwest quadrant of TH101 and Creekwood Drive; connects to a drainage channel Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 70 210 0 2.96 115 340 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Poa pratensis 70 Y FAC (Plot size:5' Solidago canadensis 20 N FACU Solidago gigantea 15 N Phalaris arundinacea 10 N FACW Y 0 TH 101 CSAH 14-61 Improvements Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30' 115 (Plot size:15' Tree Stratum (Plot size: WGS NAD 1984 FACW 25 50 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 1 1 20 80 100.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/Carver CountySampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/19/2015 Sampling Point:A-1MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Sec: 36, Twp: 116N, Ran: 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1A , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Y Sampling Point:A-1 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-20 10YR 2/1 100 silty clay loam 20-24 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 4/6 2 RM PL silty clay loam slightly brighter 24-30 10YR 4/2 80 5YR 5/6 20 RM PL Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Hydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches):Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):24 20 loamy sand Based on secondary indicators *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):Ashley Payne, Aaron Stolte Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:City of Chanhassen State: hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: Y Cordova-Webster complex NWI Classification: 5 Lat:Long:44.818683 Datum:-93.537676 Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Absolute % Cover30' If yes, optional wetland site ID: Sample point upslope 2-ft from A-1 N Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 70 210 0 2.82 85 240 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Poa pratensis 70 Y FAC (Plot size:5' Solidago gigantea 15 N FACW Y 0 TH 101 CSAH 14-61 Improvements Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30' 85 (Plot size:15' Tree Stratum (Plot size: WGS NAD 1984 15 30 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 1 1 0 0 100.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/Carver CountySampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/19/2015 Sampling Point:A-2MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Sec: 36, Twp: 116N, Ran: 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1A , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X Y Sampling Point:A-2 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-20 10YR 2/1 100 silty clay loam 20-24 10YR 4/2 90 5YR 5/6 10 D PL loamy sand Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Hydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches):Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Upslope from SP-A1 *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Disturbed, unmowed ag field Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/Carver CountySampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/19/2015 Sampling Point:B-1MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Sec: 36, Twp: 116N, Ran: 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) n/a , or hydrology , or hydrology X TH 101 CSAH 14-61 Improvements Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30' 100 (Plot size:15' Tree Stratum (Plot size: WGS NAD 1984 FACU 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 3 1 50 200 33.33% Y 0 Dactylis glomerata 15 Y plantago major 5 N FAC rumex crispus 5 N FAC taraxacum officinale solidago canadensis 5 N FACU Eleocharis palustris 40 Y OBL (Plot size:5' Trifolium repens 25 Y FACU 0 2.70 100 270 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 5 N FACU 40 40 10 30 Absolute % Cover30' If yes, optional wetland site ID: Tiled, unmowed, agricultural field; sample taken at lowest point, drain tile inlet about 20ft NE of sample point Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus X X Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Y Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 1 Lat:Long:44.818146 Datum:-93.535872 Investigator(s):Ashley Payne, Aaron Stolte Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:City of Chanhassen State: depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches):Yes Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) met hydric soil in first 8in Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Hydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Y Sampling Point:B-1 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-8 10YR 2/1 98 5YR 5/6 2 C PL clay loam US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Disturbed, unmowed ag field Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/Carver CountySampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/19/2015 Sampling Point:B-2MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Sec: 36, Twp: 116N, Ran: 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) n/a , or hydrology , or hydrology X TH 101 CSAH 14-61 Improvements Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30' 70 (Plot size:15' Tree Stratum (Plot size: WGS NAD 1984 FACU 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 3 0 65 260 0.00% Y 0 Trifolium pratense 20 Y Rumex crispus 5 N FAC Taraxacum officinale Dactylis glomerata 20 Y FACU (Plot size:5' Trifolium repens 20 Y FACU 0 3.93 70 275 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 5 N FACU 0 0 5 15 Absolute % Cover30' If yes, optional wetland site ID: Tiled, unmowed, agricultural field; sample taken upland about 2-3ft from lowest point at vegetation change N Dominan t Species Indicator Staus X X N Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Y Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 3 Lat:Long:44.818065 Datum:-93.536047 Investigator(s):Ashley Payne, Aaron Stolte Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:City of Chanhassen State: hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches):Yes Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) met hydric soil in first 12in Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Hydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) 10YR 2/1 98 5YR 5/6 2 C PL clay loam Y Sampling Point:B-2 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 clay loam 8-12 US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site Slope (%): Lester-Kilkenny loams Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/Carver CountySampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/19/2015 Sampling Point: C-1MN Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Sec: 25 Twp: 116N, Ran: 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) n/a , or hydrology , or hydrology TH 101 CSAH 14-61 Improvements Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30' 97 (Plot size: 15' Tree Stratum (Plot size: WGS NAD 1984 FACU Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 1 1 100.00% Y 0 Taraxacum officinale 2N Hordeum jubatum 90 Y FAC (Plot size: 5' Bromus inermis 5 N FACU 0 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) Absolute % Cover30' f yes, optional wetland site ID: depression between golfcourse and roadway; standing water; clay soils Y Dominant Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Y NWI Classification: 1 Lat:Long:44.82449 Datum:-93.537122 Investigator(s): Ashley Payne, Aaron Stolte Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: City of Chanhassen State: depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X compact clay *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present? Yes No Depth (inches): 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches):Yes Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): 16 Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) compact clay Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Hydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) 10YR 3/1 98 5YR 4/6 2 C PL silty loam 15-16 10YR 3/1 95 5YR 4/6 5 C PL Y Sampling Point:C-1 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** 0-8 10YR 2/1 98 5YR 4/6 2 C PL mucky silty loam 8-15 US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Lester-Kilkenny loams Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):Ashley Payne, Aaron Stolte Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:City of Chanhassen State: depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: Y NWI Classification: 5 Lat:Long:44.824517 Datum:-93.537079 N Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Absolute % Cover30' If yes, optional wetland site ID: upslope from depression between golfcourse and roadway; clay soils N Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 5 15 0 3.95 110 435 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Bromus inermis 80 Y FACU (Plot size:5' Lotus corniculatus 20 N FACU Taraxacum officinale 5 N Poa pratensis 5 N FAC N 0 TH 101 CSAH 14-61 Improvements Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30' 110 (Plot size:15' Tree Stratum (Plot size: WGS NAD 1984 FACU 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 1 0 105 420 0.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/Carver CountySampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/19/2015 Sampling Point:C-2MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Sec: 25 Twp: 116N, Ran: 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) n/a , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Y Sampling Point:C-2 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-8 10YR 2/1 80 10YR 4/2 10 D M clay loam mixed soil 10YR 4/6 10 C PL 8-15 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C PL Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Hydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) owner says soils do not drain well; restrictive layer at 16in Depth (inches):16 Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) compact clay Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches):Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X compact clay loam *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/Carver CountySampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/19/2015 Sampling Point:E-1MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Sec: 35, Twp: 116N, Ran: 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) n/a , or hydrology , or hydrology X TH 101 CSAH 14-61 Improvements Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30' 40 (Plot size:15' Tree Stratum (Plot size: WGS NAD 1984 30 60 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 2 2 0 0 100.00% Y 0 Phalaris arundinacea 30 Y FACW (Plot size:5' Typha angustifolia 10 Y OBL 0 1.75 40 70 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 10 10 0 0 Absolute % Cover30' If yes, optional wetland site ID: Roadside ditch along rural corridor of highway Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus X X Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Y Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 1 Lat:Long:44.820242 Datum:-93.53777 Investigator(s):Ashley Payne, Aaron Stolte Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:City of Chanhassen State: roadside ditch Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):0 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) X Depth (inches):0Yes Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) met hydric soil in first 10in Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Hydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Y Sampling Point:E-1 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-10 10YR 3/1 98 5YR 4/6 2 C PL silty clay loam US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):Ashley Payne, Aaron Stolte Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:City of Chanhassen State: roadside ditch upland Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: Y Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 15 Lat:Long:44.820242 Datum:-93.53777 X X N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Absolute % Cover30' If yes, optional wetland site ID: 3ft upslope from bottom of roadside ditch N Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 0 0 0 2.67 75 200 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 phalaris arundinacea 50 Y FACW (Plot size:5' taraxacum officinale 25 Y FACU Y 0 TH 101 CSAH 14-61 Improvements Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30' 75 (Plot size:15' Tree Stratum (Plot size: WGS NAD 1984 50 100 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 2 1 25 100 50.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/Carver CountySampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/19/2015 Sampling Point:Wet ditch 2MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Sec: 25, Twp: 116N, Ran: 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) n/a , or hydrology , or hydrology X US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X N Sampling Point:Wet ditch 2 Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-8 10YR 3/2 100 clay loam 8-16 10YR 3/2 50 clay loam mixed soil 16-24 10YR 4/2 100 clay loam no redox 10YR 4/2 50 Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Hydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches):Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X clay loam upslope from bottom of ditch *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region APPENDIX F Site Photos Wetland 1 Wetland 2 Wetland Ditch J (Typical Roadside Ditch) Wetland Ditch K (Typical Roadside Ditch) Appendix B Crash Data Crash Type Summary CH 101 10 Year Crash Summary Report Version 1.0 March 2010 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015Analysis Years: Crash Summary: K - Fatal A - Incapacitating B - Non-Incapacitating C - Possible N - Property Damage 0 1 6 12 43 Total 62 0X - Not Reported 0Miscoded Surface Condition Summary: 01 - Dry 02 - Wet 03 - Snow 04 - Slush 05 - Ice/Packed Snow 28 14 10 2 8 Other 0 Unknown/Not Specified Miscoded 0 0 62Total Number of Vehicles 1 2 3+ 48 11 3 0 1 5 11 31 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 Diagram Summary: 02 - Sideswipe - Same Dir 03 - Left Turn 04 - Ran Off Road - Left Side 05 - Right Angle 06 - Right Turn 2 0 11 0 0 07 - Ran Off Road - Right Side 30 08 - Head On Other 3 11 62Total 309 - Sideswipe - Opposing Dir 0Unknown/Not Stated Miscoded 2 Intersection Relation Summary: 01 - Not at Intersection 02 - T Intersection 03 - Y Intersection 04 - 4 Legged Intersection 05 - 5 or more Leg Intersection 62 0 0 0 0 07 - Intersection Related 0 08 - Alley or Driveway 11 - Recreational Crossing 0 0 62Total 009 - School Crossing 020 -22 - Interchange Other 0 0Unknown/Not Stated 0Miscoded 006 - Roundabout/Traffic Circle 010 - RR Crossing Light Condition Summary: 01 - Daylight 02 - Before Sunrise 03 - After Sunset 04 - Dark (Street Lights On) 05 - Dark (Street Lights Off) 38 1 2 5 0 06 - Dark (No Street Lights)14 07 - Dark (Unknown Lighting) Unknown/Not Stated 2 0 62Total 0Other 0Miscoded Accident Type Summary 01 - Motor Vehicle in Transport 02 - Parked Vehicle 03-04 - Road Equipment 05 - Train 06 - Bike 14 2 0 0 0 07 - Pedestrian 0 08-09 - Deer/Animal 21-42 - Fixed Object 3 38 62Total 010-14 - Other/Unknown Collision 551 - Overturn 52-65 - Other Non-Collision 0 0Other 0Unknown/Not Stated Miscoded 0 WORK AREA: COUNTY_CODE('10') - FILTER: INTERSECTION_RELATION_CODE('01') - SPATIAL FILTER APPLIED Selection Filter: Analyst:Notes: Brandon Bourdon 05/13/2019 Page 1 of 1MnCMAT 1.0.0 Appendix C 2015 Preliminary Design and Proposed Wetland Impacts Wetland Impact Figures Drainage DitchConnected to anEstimated Wetland Boundary 489.67 SqftDitch Impacts Wetland 12,695.44 SqftWetland Impacts 1,018.19 SqftDitch Impacts 45.16 SqftDitch Impacts 157.47 SqftDitch Impacts 1,364.34 SqftDitch Impacts 610.81 SqftDitch Impacts 41.85 SqftDitch Impacts 48.49 SqftDitch Impacts 10.14 SqftDitch ImpactsDelphinium LnF o xf o r dRdBram ble Dr Gr eat Pl ai nsBl vdGreatPlainsBlvdGreatPlainsBlvdGreat Plains BlvdRaspberryHillPineview Ct Pi o ne e r Trl Pioneer Trl 1 inch = 200 feet Document Path: K:\012363-000\GIS\Maps\Wetland Impact Figures\Figure2_WetlandDelineation.mxd Date Saved: 7/3/2019 10:12:08 AMTH-101 (CSAH-14 to CSAH-61)City of Chanhassen, Minnesota DNR River/Stream Construction Limits Proposed Roadway Wetland Impacts Wetland Delineation Figure 2A - Wetland Delineation 0 200Feet¯ 610.81 SqftDitch Impacts 942.95 SqftDitch Impacts Wetland 21,331.07 SqftWetland Impacts Stormwater Pond2,934.30 Sqft(Incidential) Impacts Wetland 370,837 SqftWetland Impacts (Fill) 1,558.39 SqftDitch Impacts Wetland 352,272 SqftWetland Impacts (Excavation) Flying Cl o u d D r Flyin g C lo u d D rV ogelsbergTrl CountyRd1 0 1Great Plains BlvdGreatPlainsB lv d GreatPlainsBlvdC r e e k w o o d D r Mandan CircleL a k o ta L n 1 inch = 200 feet Document Path: K:\012363-000\GIS\Maps\Wetland Impact Figures\Figure2_WetlandDelineation.mxd Date Saved: 7/3/2019 10:12:08 AMTH-101 (CSAH-14 to CSAH-61)City of Chanhassen, Minnesota DNR River/Stream Construction Limits Proposed Roadway Wetland Impacts Wetland Delineation Figure 2B - Wetland Delineation 0 200Feet¯ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Approve Quote for Stormwater Improvements in Carver Beach Neighborhood Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5. Prepared By Jason Wedel, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council Approves the quote from Minger Construction in the amount of $23,967.50 for stormwater improvements in the Carver Beach neighborhood.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The city reconstructed the streets within the Carver Beach neighborhood in 2015. The improvements included the replacement of the existing storm sewer in certain areas, the addition of new storm in other areas, and repaving all of the streets. The street paving included the addition of bituminous curb and gutter where none had existed previously. The intent of the project was to replace the failing pavement and improve the management of stormwater runoff. As a result of the project, there is now increased stormwater runoff in certain areas compared to what had existed prior to the street reconstruction project. This has had unintended consequences in a couple of areas. In particular, on Quiver Drive there is now more storm water runoff being directed to the existing catch basin than previously existed. DISCUSSION This issue has been brought to the city's attention by the residents who live in the general vicinity of the catch basin. Due to the amount of stormwater runoff being directed at the catch basin it is unable to receive all of the water during larger rain events. In those situations the storm water bypasses the catch basin and continues to flow down the street and around the corner onto Pawnee Drive. There is only one catch basin located on Pawnee Drive that is at the low point in the street. That catch basin is not able to receive the stormwater runoff as quickly as needed and overtops the curb and flows into the yards of the adjacent properties. RECOMMENDATION City staff are recommending the installation of a larger capacity catch basin on Quiver Drive. A higher capacity catch basin will be able to accept more stormwater runoff during the larger rain events and capture it before it continues around the corner onto Pawnee Drive. The city received three quotes to perform this work and they are as follows: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 9, 2019SubjectApprove Quote for Stormwater Improvements in Carver Beach NeighborhoodSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5.Prepared By Jason Wedel, Public Works Director/CityEngineer File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council Approves the quote from Minger Construction in the amount of $23,967.50 for stormwaterimprovements in the Carver Beach neighborhood.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe city reconstructed the streets within the Carver Beach neighborhood in 2015. The improvements included thereplacement of the existing storm sewer in certain areas, the addition of new storm in other areas, and repaving all ofthe streets. The street paving included the addition of bituminous curb and gutter where none had existed previously. The intent of the project was to replace the failing pavement and improve the management of stormwater runoff.As a result of the project, there is now increased stormwater runoff in certain areas compared to what had existedprior to the street reconstruction project. This has had unintended consequences in a couple of areas. In particular,on Quiver Drive there is now more storm water runoff being directed to the existing catch basin than previouslyexisted.DISCUSSIONThis issue has been brought to the city's attention by the residents who live in the general vicinity of the catch basin. Due to the amount of stormwater runoff being directed at the catch basin it is unable to receive all of the water duringlarger rain events. In those situations the storm water bypasses the catch basin and continues to flow down the streetand around the corner onto Pawnee Drive. There is only one catch basin located on Pawnee Drive that is at the lowpoint in the street. That catch basin is not able to receive the stormwater runoff as quickly as needed and overtops thecurb and flows into the yards of the adjacent properties.RECOMMENDATIONCity staff are recommending the installation of a larger capacity catch basin on Quiver Drive. A higher capacity catchbasin will be able to accept more stormwater runoff during the larger rain events and capture it before it continues around the corner onto Pawnee Drive. The city received three quotes to perform this work and they are as follows: Company Quote Minger Construction Co., Inc.$23,967.50 Kusske Construction Company, LLC $27,710.00 Blackstone Constractors, LLC $28,875.00 Attached are copies of all three quotes. The quotes from Kusske and Blackstone were modified slightly so that the quantities of materials were consistent for all three quotes for comparison purposes. Funding for this work will come from the city's Surface Water Management fund. In 2019, the Surface Water Management Fund included $40,000 for miscellaneous stormwater improvements throughout the city. To date, none of those funds have been used this year and are available for this project. A copy of the specific page from the 2019 budget is attached. There are also some other smaller stormwater improvements that will be made within the Carver Beach neighborhood this fall. Those projects are much lower in cost and do not require city council authorization. All combined, the total expenditures for stormwater improvements with be within the 2019 budgeted amount. ATTACHMENTS: Budget Sheet Minger Proposal Kusske Proposal Blackstone Proposal 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget %Inc/(Dec) Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 146,887 139,037 184,800 188,600 2.1% 194,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 630 7,287 1,000 5,000 400.0% 5,000 4030 Contributions-Retirement 37,281 28,552 28,000 29,000 3.6% 29,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 16,236 21,172 35,000 37,000 5.7% 41,000 4050 Workers Compensation 1,169 986 1,000 1,000 0.0% 1,000 Total Personal Services 202,203 197,034 249,800 260,600 4.3% 270,000 4120 Supplies-Equipment 1,600 123 3,000 1,600 (46.7%) 1,600 4130 Supplies-Program 17,479 11,324 35,000 40,000 14.3% 45,000 4150 Maintenance Materials 10,134 4,766 12,000 12,000 0.0% 12,000 Total Materials & Supplies 29,213 16,212 50,000 53,600 7.2% 58,600 4300 Fees, Services 88,096 133,473 96,000 96,000 0.0% 130,000 4301 Auditing 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600 0.0% 4,600 4310 Telephone and Communications 1,207 1,857 1,400 2,000 42.9% 2,000 4340 Printing & Publishing - 25 100 100 0.0% 100 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 1,300 965 1,000 1,000 0.0% 1,000 4370 Travel & Training 1,338 2,327 3,000 3,000 0.0% 3,000 4380 Mileage- 150 300 300 0.0% 300 4410 Equipment Rental 865 1,022 - 1,000 100.0% 1,000 4483 Insurance-General Liability 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 0.0% 7,500 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 614 614 400 600 50.0% 600 Total Contractual Services 105,521 152,533 114,300 116,100 1.6% 150,100 Total Expenditures 336,936 365,779 414,100 430,300 3.9% 478,700 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Expenditures 7200 Administration 97 To:Contact:City of Chanhassen Chanhassen 2019 Minor Grading - Carver Beach AreaProject Name:Bid Number: Fax:(952) 227-1110 Address:Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone:(952) 227-1100 Project Location:Chanhassen, MN Bid Date:8/15/2019 Total PriceUnit PriceUnitItem DescriptionItem # Estimated Quantity 01. Hopi Rd Drainage 1 1.00 LS $4,575.00 $4,575.00Mobilization 2 1.00 LS $2,920.00 $2,920.00Clearing & Grubbing 3 1.00 LS $4,520.00 $4,520.00Remove existing rip rap 4 65.00 CY $130.50 $8,482.50Class III Rip Rap w/ Fabric 5 10.00 CY $189.50 $1,895.00Class IV Rip Rap w/ Fabric 6 300.00 SY $5.25 $1,575.00Seed w/ Cat 3 Blanket Total Price for above 01. Hopi Rd Drainage Items: $23,967.50 02. Quiver Rd Drainage 7 1.00 LS $4,850.00 $4,850.00Mobilization 8 1.00 LS $2,100.00 $2,100.00Ditch Grading 9 25.00 CY $10.00 $250.00Import Clay 10 30.00 LF $15.00 $450.00Remove Curb 11 45.00 LF $55.00 $2,475.00Install Curb 12 1.00 EACH $7,700.00 $7,700.0048" MH w/ 3' Sump & 3067 Casting 13 30.00 CY $149.75 $4,492.50Class III Rip Rap w/ Fabric 14 40.00 SY $75.00 $3,000.00Asphalt Patching - 3.5" Thick 15 250.00 SY $5.25 $1,312.50Seed w/ Cat 3 Blanket Total Price for above 02. Quiver Rd Drainage Items: $26,630.00 03. Lone Eagle Dr. Rip Rap 16 1.00 LS $1,015.00 $1,015.00Mobilization 17 1.00 LS $1,115.00 $1,115.00Minor Grading 18 20.00 CY $118.00 $2,360.00Class III Rip Rap w/ Fabric Total Price for above 03. Lone Eagle Dr. Rip Rap Items:$4,490.00 Total Bid Price: $55,087.50 Notes: • This quote includes: - Traffic Control - Restoration • This quote excludes: - Permits - Survey • If you have any questions or concerns regarding this quote please feel free to give me a call. Thank you for the opportunity! Luke Minger 8/15/2019 3:23:35 PM Page 1 of 2 ACCEPTED: The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. Buyer: Signature: Date of Acceptance: CONFIRMED: Minger Construction Co., Inc. Authorized Signature: Estimator:Luke Minger (952) 368-9200 lukem@mingerconst.com 8/15/2019 3:23:35 PM Page 2 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Resolution 2019XX: Approve Quotes for Lift Station 22 Rehabilitation Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6. Prepared By Jason Wedel, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves quote in the amount of $24,440.00 to Minnesota Pump Works for pump and installation of equipment at Lift Station #22.” And, "The City Council approves quote in the amount of $32,400.00 to Stacon for a panel and installation of equipment at Lift Station #22." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Annually, the city considers replacement of equipment for lift stations that are old, unreliable, or in need of upgrades. These replacements are designed to make the sanitary lift station network more reliable and reduce the likelihood of emergency calls and the potential for sewer backups. The city currently maintains 32 lift stations. Many of these lift stations have highservice pumps and require frequent maintenance. The 2019 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) had identified Lift Stations #18 and #28 for repairs this year. However, Lift Station #28 was actually rehabilitated in 2018 and the CIP should have been updated to include Lift Station #22 instead. Lift Station #18 was rehabilitated this spring after approval by the City Council on April 22nd. The City Council is now being asked to consider approval of moving forward with the rehabilitation of Lift Station #22. DISCUSSION Lift Station #22 is located along Dell Road. The proposed improvements include replacement of the pumps, piping, guide rails and panel. Two quotes were received for the pumps and piping and three quotes were received for the control panel. Staff is seeking approval of these quotes at this time. PUMP QUOTES Staff received two quotes for the pumps: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 9, 2019SubjectResolution 2019XX: Approve Quotes for Lift Station 22 RehabilitationSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6.Prepared By Jason Wedel, Public Works Director/CityEngineer File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves quote in the amount of $24,440.00 to Minnesota Pump Works for pump and installationof equipment at Lift Station #22.”And,"The City Council approves quote in the amount of $32,400.00 to Stacon for a panel and installation of equipment atLift Station #22."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYAnnually, the city considers replacement of equipment for lift stations that are old, unreliable, or in need of upgrades. These replacements are designed to make the sanitary lift station network more reliable and reduce the likelihood ofemergency calls and the potential for sewer backups. The city currently maintains 32 lift stations. Many of these liftstations have highservice pumps and require frequent maintenance. The 2019 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) hadidentified Lift Stations #18 and #28 for repairs this year. However, Lift Station #28 was actually rehabilitated in 2018and the CIP should have been updated to include Lift Station #22 instead. Lift Station #18 was rehabilitated thisspring after approval by the City Council on April 22nd. The City Council is now being asked to consider approval ofmoving forward with the rehabilitation of Lift Station #22.DISCUSSIONLift Station #22 is located along Dell Road. The proposed improvements include replacement of the pumps, piping,guide rails and panel.Two quotes were received for the pumps and piping and three quotes were received for the control panel. Staff isseeking approval of these quotes at this time.PUMP QUOTES Staff received two quotes for the pumps: Company Quote Minnesota Pump Works $24,440.00 Electric Pump $36,313.00 PANEL QUOTES Staff received three quotes for the panels Company Quote Stacon $32,400.00 Minnesota Pump Works $41,604.00 Ultimate Controls Electric, LLC $44,765.00 FUNDING Funding for the replacement of the electrical panel and pumps was budgeted for in the 2019 CIP SS017. The total budget was $135,000. The rehabilitation work that took place this spring cost $67,071.64 for Lift Station #18. The cost for the proposed rehabilitation of Lift Station #22 is $56,840.00. The total cost for both lift stations is $123,911.64 which is $11,088.36 below the $135,000 included in the CIP. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CIP Sheet Low Pump Quote Low Panel Quote CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: September 9, 2019 RESOLUTION NO: 2019-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING QUOTES FOR LIFT STATION #22 REHABILITATION WHEREAS, quotes were received for panels and pumps for the Lift Station #22 Rehabilitation; and WHEREAS, it appears the quote from Minnesota Pump Works in the amount of $24,440 is the lowest responsible quote for the pumps; and WHEREAS, it appears the quote from Stacon in the amount of $32,400 is the lowest responsible quote for the panel. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to approve the quote from Minnesota Pump Works in the amount of $24,400 for the pumps for the Lift Station #22 Rehabilitation. 2. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to approve the quote from Stacon in the amount of $32,400 for the panel for the Lift Station #22 Rehabilitation. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 9th day of September, 2019. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Glendale Drive Homes: Approve Amended Development Contract Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.7. Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer File No: Planning Case 201813 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the attached First Amendment to Development Contract for Glendale Drive Homes". Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. DISCUSSION On August 26, 2019, the City Council approved the Final Plat, Development Contract, and Construction Plans for Glendale Drive Homes with conditions Planning Case 201813. The city and developer previously entered into a Development Contract dated August 26, 2019 concerning the plat of Glendale Drive Homes, for the property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (“Development Contract”). Paragraph 8B, Engineering, subparagraph 1. of Other Special Conditions of the Development Contract, is hereby amended to read as follows: "Lot 1, Block 1 of the plat includes a portion of Outlot A, Country Oaks Addition, which is owned by the city. The city has agreed to convey Outlot A, Country Oaks Addition, to the Developer by quit claim deed on condition that the Developer convey Outlots A and B of the plat to the city immediately following recording of the plat and free and clear of any encumbrances. The properties to be exchanged reflect an even exchange of property between the city and Developer." RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached Amendment to the Development Contract. ATTACHMENTS: Development Contract First Amendment to Development Contract Glendale Drive Homes CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA GLENDALE DRIVE HOMES DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) i TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL PROVISIONS PAGE 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL ............................................................................ SP-1 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL ........................................................................ SP-1 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS ............................................................................................ SP-1 4. IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................................................ SP-2 5. TIME OF PERFORMANCE ......................................................................................... SP-2 6. SECURITY .................................................................................................................... SP-2 7. NOTICE ......................................................................................................................... SP-3 8. OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS................................................................................ SP-3 9. GENERAL CONDITIONS ........................................................................................... SP-5 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. RIGHT TO PROCEED ................................................................................................. GC-1 2. PHASED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................ GC-1 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS ................................................................................ GC-1 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS ..................................................................... GC-1 5. IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................................................... GC-1 6. IRON MONUMENTS .................................................................................................. GC-2 7. LICENSE ...................................................................................................................... GC-2 8. SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ......................................................... GC-2 8A. EROSION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING OR OTHER BUILDING ......................................................................................... GC-2 9. CLEAN UP ................................................................................................................... GC-3 10. ACCEPTANCE AND OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................... GC-3 11. CLAIMS ....................................................................................................................... GC-3 12. PARK DEDICATION .................................................................................................. GC-3 13. LANDSCAPING .......................................................................................................... GC-3 14. WARRANTY ............................................................................................................... GC-4 15. LOT PLANS ................................................................................................................. GC-4 16. EXISTING ASSESSMENTS ....................................................................................... GC-4 17. HOOK-UP CHARGES ................................................................................................. GC-4 18. PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING..................................................................................... GC-4 19. SIGNAGE ..................................................................................................................... GC-5 20. HOUSE PADS .............................................................................................................. GC-5 21. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS ................................................................................ GC-5 22. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT ......................................................................................... GC-6 22. MISCELLANEOUS A. Construction Trailers ........................................................................................ GC-6 B. Postal Service .................................................................................................... GC-7 C. Third Parties ...................................................................................................... GC-7 D. Breach of Contract ............................................................................................ GC-7 E. Severability ....................................................................................................... GC-7 ii F. Building Permits ............................................................................................... GC-7 G. Waivers/Amendments ....................................................................................... GC-7 H. Release .............................................................................................................. GC-7 I. Insurance ........................................................................................................... GC-7 J. Remedies ........................................................................................................... GC-8 K. Assignability ..................................................................................................... GC-8 L. Construction Hours ........................................................................................... GC-8 M. Noise Amplification .......................................................................................... GC-8 N. Access ............................................................................................................... GC-8 O. Street Maintenance............................................................................................ GC-8 P. Storm Sewer Maintenance ................................................................................ GC-9 Q. Soil Treatment Systems .................................................................................... GC-9 R. Variances........................................................................................................... GC-9 S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations ..................................... GC-9 T. Proof of Title ..................................................................................................... GC-9 U. Soil Conditions................................................................................................ GC-10 V. Soil Correction ................................................................................................ GC-10 W. Haul Routes ......................................................................................................... GC-10 X. Development Signs .............................................................................................. GC-10 Y. Construction Plans ............................................................................................... GC-10 Z. As-Built Lot Surveys ........................................................................................... GC-11 SP-1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) GLENDALE DRIVE HOMES SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated August 26, 2019 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and, Lake West Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for Glendale Drive Homes (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the plat. 3. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plan A, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A: Final plat approved August 26, 2019, prepared by Advance Surveying & Engineering Co. Plan B: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated January 14, 2019 last updated July 17, 2019, prepared by Ryan Engineering. Plan C: Plans and Specifications for Improvements dated January 14, 2019 last updated July 17, 2019, prepared by Ryan Engineering. Plan D: Landscape Plan dated January 11, 2019 last updated July 17, 2019, prepared by Ryan Engineering. SP-2 4. Improvements. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Water Drainage System D. Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Street Lights G. Site Grading/Restoration H. Underground Utilities (e.g. gas, electric, telephone, CATV) I. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments J. Surveying and Staking K. Landscaping L. Erosion Control 5. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements by November 15, 2020. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City Engineer. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 6. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank acceptable to the City, or cash escrow ("security") for $45,774.22. The amount of the security was calculated as 110% of the following: Site Grading/Erosion Control/Restoration $30,727.00 Sanitary Sewer $ - Watermain $7,450.00 Storm Sewer, Drainage System, including cleaning and maintenance $ - Streets $ - Street lights and signs $ - Sub-total, Construction Costs $38,177.00 Engineering, surveying, and inspection (7% of construction costs) $2,672.39 Landscaping (2% of construction costs) $763.54 Sub-total, Other Costs $3,435.93 TOTAL COST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS $41,612.93 SECURITY AMOUNT (110% of 41,612.93) $45,774.22 SP-3 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The security shall be subject to the approval of the City. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. With City approval, the security may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid, but in no case shall the security be reduced to a point less than 10% of the original amount until (1) all improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied, (4) the required “record” plans have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security is provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 7. Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Perry Ryan Lake West Development, LLC 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 952-653-1359 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 8. Other Special Conditions. A. SECURITIES AND FEES 1. A $45,774.22 letter of credit or escrow for the developer-installed improvements, the $61,554.87 cash administration fee and the fully-executed development contract must be submitted and shall be submitted prior to scheduling a pre-construction meeting. B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Engineering: 1. On sheet C-1 of the site and utility plan and profile: the general utility note that reads “The contractor shall receive the necessary permits for all work outside of the property limits” shall specifically reference the city’s Underground Utility Permit and coordination with Public Works staff (952-227-1300) for work within the public right-of-way; the general utility note that reads “All storm sewer pipe shall be class 5 unless otherwise noted” shall reference RCP class 5; the general utility note that reads “The contractor shall contact “Gopher State One Call” for utility locations prior to utility installation” SP-4 shall specify that utility locates shall be completed prior to grading and utility installation; fire hydrant call-out shall indicate city detail plate #1004; remove and replace pavement call-out shall indicate city detail plate #5202A 2. On sheet C-2 of the grading plan: general grading and drainage notes refer to a “paving plan” for detailed spot elevations, no paving plan should be necessary for these improvements however if one was created the applicant shall submit the paving plan for review; the general grading and drainage notes shall indicate that cleaning operations of streets shall be conducted by a street sweeper vacuum truck. 3. On sheet C-3 of the erosion control plan BMP O&M plan: the silt fence extending through and across the construction entrance shall be removed to not cross the construction entrance and shall instead “J-hook” on each side of the entrance. 4. On sheet C-4 of the details and notes: add detail plates specific to all improvements to the site and utilize the city’s details where applicable (e.g. connection to existing catch basin, water services, sanitary services, outlet control structures, concrete washouts, street cuts/repairs, hydrant installations, etc.) 5. On sheet C-5 of the SWPPP – narrative and notes: update “dates of construction” to indicate that the installation of silt fence and the construction entrance must be installed prior to mass grading or the removal of trees; update City of Chanhassen erosion control notes for a minimum of 48 hour notice prior to inspection and to call Ryan Pinkalla at 952-227-1173 for the initial inspection. Water Resources: 1. Easements for private stormwater treatment devices must be recorded against the properties using the city’s private stormwater easement template and approved by the City Engineer. 2. A Homeowners Association (HOA) encompassing all lots is required to ensure the technical expertise and a funding mechanism for the operation and maintenance of stormwater treatment devices is ensured in perpetuity. 3. Operation and maintenance of private stormwater BMPs is required in perpetuity. An operation and maintenance plan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator and recorded against the properties that details the HOA’s permanent inspection, maintenance, and funding mechanism that ensures stormwater BMPs will function as designed. 4. To ensure stormwater treatment devices function as designed, the developer is responsible for the operation, maintenance, and performance of all stormwater improvements including vegetation, structures, soils, inspections, and erosion/sediment SP-5 control for the first five years after project completion. After the first five years, responsibility shall transfer to the HOA. The developer is responsible for ensuring all stormwater improvements are functioning as designed at the end of the first five years. If stormwater improvements are not functioning as designed at the end of the first five years, as determined by the City Engineer, than the developer shall remain responsible for all operation and maintenance until devices are functioning as designed. 5. Maximum impervious per lot is 25%. 6. An updated boring log was received in an effort to satisfy Water Resources preliminary plat condition 14, which was imposed based on previously submitted geotechnical reports. However, a standalone boring log is insufficient in meeting the condition, and an updated, comprehensive geotechnical report by a licensed geotechnical engineer incorporating the updated findings with subsequent analysis and recommendations shall be submitted. 7. The proposed redevelopment requires Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) development review and permits. 8. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure and submit proof that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, MPCA, Carver County, MCWD, Board of Water and Soil Resources, PCA, etc.) prior to the City issuing permits. 9. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Contract are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. SP-6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20__, by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC SP-7 Lake West Development, LLC: BY: Curt Fretham, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20__, by Curt Fretham, Chief Manager of Lake West Development Company, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Parcel A: (Abstract) Beginning at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 5, Section 5, Township 116, Range 23, thence East along the southerly line of said Government Lot, 594.2 feet; thence North at right angles to said southerly line of Government lot 5 for a distance of 262.5 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence continuing North on said last described line for a distance of 103.5 feet to the point of intersection with a line drawn parallel to and 366.0 feet North of the South line of said Government Lot 5, thence East along said parallel line to its point of intersection with the westerly line of Carver County Road No.3 (formerly known as Glencoe Road), thence Southwesterly along the westerly right-of-way line of said Carver County Road No. 3 to its point of intersection with a line drawn parallel to and 262.5 feet north of the South line of said Government Lot 5; thence West along said parallel line to the point of beginning. And including: Starting at the SW corner of said cemetery, identified as Minnewashta Cemetery in Document No. A253524 recorded with the Carver County Recorder, State of Minnesota, thence south one rod to the north line of George M. Leach's premises, thence east over said line to the west side of the Minneapolis and Glencoe Road; thence northeasterly along said road to the south line of H. H. Whitmore premises {now Maple Drive in Pleasant Acres Plat); thence west along said line to the starting point. Said strip of land is one rod wide and is a part of Lot 5, of Section 5, Township 116, Range 23. Parcel B: (Abstract) Beginning at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 5, Section 5, Township 116, Range 23, thence East along the southerly line of said Government Lot, 594.2 feet; thence North at right angles to said southerly line of Government Lot 5 for a distance of 366.00 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence continuing North on said last described line for a distance of 30.00 feet to the point of intersection with a line drawn parallel to and 396.0 feet North of the South line of said Government Lot 5; thence East along said parallel line to its point of intersection with the westerly line of Carver County Road No. 3 (formerly known as Glencoe Road); thence Southwesterly along the westerly right-of-way line of said Carver County Road No.3 to its point of intersection with a line drawn parallel to and 366.00 feet north of the South line of said Government Lot 5; thence West along said parallel line to the point of beginning. Parcel C: (Torrens) Outlot A, Country Oaks, Carver County, Minnesota. Together with a permanent easement for driveway and utility purposes as contained and granted in Document Number 92538 filed December 16, 1987. MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 20 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by . NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of , 20 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by . NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2______, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2______. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ GC-1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the plat has been recorded with the County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Title’s Office of the County where the plat is located, and 4) the City Engineer has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Phased Development. If the plat is a phase of a multiphased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Contract and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Park charges and area charges for sewer and water referred to in this Contract are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the plat that are designated in an approved preliminary plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are final platted into lots and blocks. 3. Preliminary Plat Status. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within two (2) years after preliminary plat approval. 4. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5. Improvements. The improvements specified in the Special Provisions of this Contract shall be installed in accordance with City standards, ordinances, and plans and specifications which have been prepared and signed by a competent registered professional engineer furnished to the City and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and other pertinent agencies before proceeding GC-2 with construction. The City will, at the Developer's expense, have one or more construction inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer shall also provide a qualified inspector to perform site inspections on a daily basis. Inspector qualifications shall be submitted in writing to the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its project engineer/inspector to respond to questions from the City Inspector(s) and to make periodic site visits to satisfy that the construction is being performed to an acceptable level of quality in accordance with the engineer's design. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 6. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 7. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 8. Site Erosion and Sediment Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion and sediment control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion and sediment control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion and sediment transport. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion and sediment control plan and schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion and sediment transport at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion and sediment control requirements. Erosion and sediment control needs to be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored, even if construction has been completed and accepted. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion and sediment control, the City will authorize the removal of the erosion and sediment control, i.e. hay bales and silt fence. The Developer shall remove and dispose of the erosion and sediment control measures. 8a. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. GC-3 9. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 10. Acceptance and Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and acceptance by the City of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property. After completion of the improvements, a representative of the contractor, and a representative of the Developer's engineer will make a final inspection of the work with the City Engineer. Before the City accepts the improvements, the City Engineer shall be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the Developer and his engineer shall submit a written statement to the City Engineer certifying that the project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The appropriate contractor waivers shall also be provided. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall be by City Council resolution. 11. Claims. In the event that the City receives claims from laborers, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment out of the financial guarantees posted with the City, and if the claims are not resolved at least ninety (90) days before the security required by this Contract will expire, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125% of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees. 12. Park Dedication. The Developer shall pay full park dedication fees in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. The park dedication fees shall be the current amount in force at the time of final platting pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinances and City Council resolutions. 13. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with Plan D. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City’s approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2½) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). In addition to any sod required as a part of the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, the Developer or lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of six (6) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the GC-4 escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. 14. Warranty. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to two (2) years from the date of final written acceptance. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one full growing season following acceptance by the City. 15. Lot Plans. Prior to the issuance of building permits, an acceptable Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control including silt fences, and Tree Removal Plan shall be submitted for each lot for review and approval by the City Engineer. Each plan shall assure that drainage is maintained away from buildings and that tree removal is consistent with development plans and City Ordinance. 16. Existing Assessments. Any existing assessments against the plat will be re-spread against the plat in accordance with City standards. 17. Hook-up Charges. . At the time of final plat approval the Developer shall pay 30% of the City Sewer Hook-up charge and 30% of the City Water hook up charge for each lot in the plat in the amount specified in Special Provision, Paragraph 8, of this Development Contract. The balance of the hook-up charges is collected at the time building permits are issued are based on 70% of the rates then in effect, unless a written request is made to assess the costs over a four year term at the rates in effect at time of application. 18. Public Street Lighting. The Developer shall have installed and pay for public street lights in accordance with City standards. The public street lights shall be accepted for City ownership and maintenance at the same time that the public street is accepted for ownership and maintenance. A plan shall be submitted for the City Engineer's approval prior to the installation. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall pay the City a fee of $300.00 for each street light installed in GC-5 the plat. The fee shall be used by the City for furnishing electricity and maintaining each public street light for twenty (20) months. 19. Signage. All street signs, traffic signs, and wetland monumentation required by the City as a part of the plat shall be furnished and installed by the City at the sole expense of the Developer. 20. House Pads. The Developer shall promptly furnish the City "as-built" plans indicating the amount, type and limits of fill on any house pad location. 21. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall pay an administrative fee in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. This fee is to cover the cost of City Staff time and overhead for items such as review of construction documents, preparation of the Development Contract, monitoring construction progress, processing pay requests, processing security reductions, and final acceptance of improvements. This fee does not cover the City's cost for construction inspections. The fee shall be calculated as follows: i) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is less than $500,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs; ii) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is between $500,000 and $1,000,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs for the first $500,000 and two percent (2%) of construction costs over $500,000; iii) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is over $1,000,000, two and one-half percent (2½%) of construction costs for the first $1,000,000 and one and one-half percent (1½%) of construction costs over $1,000,000. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall deposit with the City a fee based upon construction estimates. After construction is completed, the final fee shall be determined based upon actual construction costs. The cost of public improvements is defined in paragraph 6 of the Special Provisions. B. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City for providing construction and erosion and sediment control inspections. This cost will be periodically billed directly to the Developer based on the actual progress of the construction. Payment shall be due in accordance with Article 21E of this Agreement. C. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. GC-6 D. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. G. Private Utilities. The Developer shall have installed and pay for the installation of electrical, natural gas, telephone, and cable television service in conjunction with the overall development improvements. These services shall be provided in accordance with each of the respective franchise agreements held with the City. H. The developer shall pay the City a fee established by City Council resolution, to reimburse the City for the cost of updating the City’s base maps, GIS data base files, and converting the plat and record drawings into an electronic format. Record drawings must be submitted within four months of final acceptance of public utilities. All digital information submitted to the City shall be in the Carver County Coordinate system. 22. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 23. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer as a part of the pre-construction meeting for installation of public improvements. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the acceptance of the public improvements unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer’s obligations under this Contract. The City GC-7 shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City’s failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. The City may also issue a stop work order halting all plat development until the breach has been cured and the City has received satisfactory assurance that the breach will not reoccur. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Building Permits. Building permits will not be issued in the plat until sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer have been installed, tested, and accepted by the City, and the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the site graded and revegetated in accordance with Plan B of the development plans. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property . After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. I. Insurance. Developer shall take out and maintain until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $500,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. J. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time GC-8 to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. K. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. L. Construction Hours. Construction hours, including pick-up and deliveries of material and equipment and the operation of any internal combustion engine, may only occur from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no such activity allowed on Sundays or on legal holidays. Contractors must require their subcontractors, agents and supplies to comply with these requirements and the Contractor is responsible for their failure to do so. Under emergency conditions, this limitation may be waived by the written consent of the City Engineer. If construction occurs outside of the permitted construction hours, the Contractor shall pay the following administrative penalties: First violation $ 500.00 Second violation $ 1,000.00 Third & subsequent violations All site development and construction must cease for seven (7) calendar days M. Noise Amplification. The use of outdoor loudspeakers, bullhorns, intercoms, and similar devices is prohibited in conjunction with the construction of homes, buildings, and the improvements required under this contract. The administrative penalty for violation of construction hours shall also apply to violation of the provisions in this paragraph. N. Access. All access to the plat prior to the City accepting the roadway improvements shall be the responsibility of the Developer regardless if the City has issued building permits or occupancy permits for lots within the plat. O. Street Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until streets within the plat are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed by the Developer when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If streets become impassable, the City may order that such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain a smooth roadway surface and provide proper surface drainage. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City plow snow on the streets prior to final acceptance of the streets. The City shall have complete discretion to approve or reject the request. The City shall not be responsible for reshaping or damage to the street base or utilities because of snow plowing operations. The provision of City snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. P. Storm Sewer Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system (including ponds, pipes, catch basins, culverts and swales) within the plat and the adjacent off-site storm sewer system that receives storm water from the plat. The Developer shall follow all instructions it receives from the City concerning the cleaning and GC-9 maintenance of the storm sewer system. The Developer's obligations under this paragraph shall end two (2) years after the public street and storm drainage improvements in the plat have been accepted by the City. Twenty percent (20%) of the storm sewer costs, shown under section 6 of the special provisions of this contract, will be held by the City for the duration of the 2-year maintenance period. Q. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the platting process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. R. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District(s); 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. T. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. U. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. V. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi-lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. GC-10 W. Haul Routes. The Developer, the Developer’s contractors or subcontractors must submit proposed haul routes for the import or export of soil, construction material, construction equipment or construction debris, or any other purpose. All haul routes must be approved by the City Engineer X. Development Signs. The Developer shall post a six foot by eight foot development sign in accordance with City Detail Plate No. 5313 at each entrance to the project. The sign shall be in place before construction of the required improvements commences and shall be removed when the required improvements are completed, except for the final lift of asphalt on streets. The signs shall contain the following information: project name, name of developer, developer’s telephone number and designated contact person, allowed construction hours. Y. Construction Plans. Upon final plat approval, the developer shall provide the City with two complete sets of full-size construction plans and four sets of 11”x17” reduced construction plan sets and three sets of specifications. Within four months after the completion of the utility improvements and base course pavement and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with the following: (1) a complete set of reproducible Mylar as-built plans, (2) two complete full-size sets of blue line/paper as-built plans, (3) two complete sets of utility tie sheets, (4) location of buried fabric used for soil stabilization, (5) location stationing and swing ties of all utility stubs including draintile cleanouts, (6) bench mark network, (7) digital file of as-built plans in both .dxf & .tif format (the .dxf file must be tied to the current county coordinate system), (8) digital file of utility tie sheets in either .doc or .tif format, and (9) a breakdown of lineal footage of all utilities installed, including the per lineal foot bid price. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. Z. As-Built Lot Surveys. An as-built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as-built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as-built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as-built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as-built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Rev. 3/31/06 1 204660v1 (reserved for recording information) FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT GLENDALE DRIVE HOMES THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (“Amendment”) is made this ___ day of __________, 20__, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). 1. The City and Developer previously entered into a Development Contract dated _________, 2019 and concerning the plat of Glendale Drive Homes, for the property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (“Development Contract”). 2. Paragraph 8B, Engineering, subparagraph 1. of Other Special Conditions of the Development Contract, is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Lot 1, Block 1 of the plat includes a portion of Outlot A Country Oaks Addition, which is owned by the City. The City has agreed to convey Outlot A, Country Oaks Addition to Developer by quit claim deed, on condition that Developer convey Outlots A and B of the plat to the City immediately following recording of the plat and free and clear of any encumbrances. The properties to be exchanged reflect an even exchange of property between the City and Developer. 2 204660v1 3. Except as herein amended, the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed this _____ day of September, 2019. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: ___________________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) And __________________________________________ Todd Gerhard, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _____________, 2019, by Elise Ryan and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. _________________________________________ Notary Public 3 204660v1 DEVELOPER: LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC By: ___________________________________________ Curt Fretham, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF _________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2019, by Curt Fretham, the Chief Manager of Lake West Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on its behalf. ______________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP 4 204660v1 EXHIBIT "A" TO FIRST AMENDMENTDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Parcel A: (Abstract) Beginning at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 5, Section 5, Township 116, Range 23, thence East along the southerly line of said Government Lot, 594.2 feet; thence North at right angles to said southerly line of Government lot 5 for a distance of 262.5 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence continuing North on said last described line for a distance of 103.5 feet to the point of intersection with a line drawn parallel to and 366.0 feet North of the South line of said Government Lot 5, thence East along said parallel line to its point of intersection with the westerly line of Carver County Road No.3 (formerly known as Glencoe Road), thence Southwesterly along the westerly right-of-way line of said Carver County Road No. 3 to its point of intersection with a line drawn parallel to and 262.5 feet north of the South line of said Government Lot 5; thence West along said parallel line to the point of beginning. And including: Starting at the SW corner of said cemetery, identified as Minnewashta Cemetery in Document No. A253524 recorded with the Carver County Recorder, State of Minnesota, thence south one rod to the north line of George M. Leach's premises, thence east over said line to the west side of the Minneapolis and Glencoe Road; thence northeasterly along said road to the south line of H.H. Whitmore premises {now Maple Drive in Pleasant Acres Plat); thence west along said line to the starting point. Said strip of land is one rod wide and is a part of Lot 5, of Section 5, Township 116, Range 23. Parcel B: (Abstract) Beginning at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 5, Section 5, Township 116, Range 23, thence East along the southerly line of said Government Lot, 594.2 feet; thence North at right angles to said southerly line of Government Lot 5 for a distance of 366.00 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence continuing North on said last described line for a distance of 30.00 feet to the point of intersection with a line drawn parallel to and 396.0 feet North of the South line of said Government Lot 5; thence East along said parallel line to its point of intersection with the westerly line of Carver County Road No. 3 (formerly known as Glencoe Road); thence Southwesterly along the westerly right-of-way line of said Carver County Road No.3 to its point of intersection with a line drawn parallel to and 366.00 feet north of the South line of said Government Lot 5; thence West along said parallel line to the point of beginning. Parcel C: (Torrens) Outlot A, Country Oaks, Carver County, Minnesota. Together with a permanent easement for driveway and utility purposes as contained and granted in Document Number 92538 filed December 16, 1987. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Adopt Amended Economic Development Commission Bylaws Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.8. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: ADM326 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts the Amended Economic Development Commission Bylaws.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The City Council adopted the Economic Development Commission Bylaws on August 12, 2019. Since that time, it has been determined that modifications need to be made to the bylaws pertaining to oaths of office, City Council Liaison, and election/duties of Chair and ViceChair. The City Council appointed members to the Economic Development Commission on August 26, 2019, with a tentative first meeting date of October 8, 2019. DISCUSSION The suggested changes are as follows: Section 3.2 Terms and Vacancies The City Council shall appoint five (5) members for staggered terms of two (2) 3year terms and three (3) 2year terms expiring on March 31 of each year.Vacancies during the term shall be filled by the City Council for the unexpired portion of the term.Every appointed member shall, before entering upon the charge of his/her duties, take an oath that he/she will faithfully discharge the duties of his office. All members shall serve without compensation. Section 3.4 City Council Liaison The Mayor or his/her City Council designee shall submit on an annual basis one current member of the City Council to act as Liaison and attend all Economic Development Commission meetings when possible.The City Council Liaison will not have voting rights. Section 4.1 – Appointment of Chairperson Election of Officers The City Council will appoint a chairperson to serve a term of one (1) year. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 9, 2019SubjectAdopt Amended Economic Development Commission BylawsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.8.Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: ADM326PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts the Amended Economic Development Commission Bylaws.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe City Council adopted the Economic Development Commission Bylaws on August 12, 2019. Since that time, ithas been determined that modifications need to be made to the bylaws pertaining to oaths of office, City CouncilLiaison, and election/duties of Chair and ViceChair.The City Council appointed members to the Economic Development Commission on August 26, 2019, with atentative first meeting date of October 8, 2019.DISCUSSIONThe suggested changes are as follows:Section 3.2 Terms and VacanciesThe City Council shall appoint five (5) members for staggered terms of two (2) 3year terms and three (3) 2yearterms expiring on March 31 of each year.Vacancies during the term shall be filled by the City Council for theunexpired portion of the term.Every appointed member shall, before entering upon the charge of his/her duties, takean oath that he/she will faithfully discharge the duties of his office. All members shall serve without compensation.Section 3.4 City Council LiaisonThe Mayor or his/her City Council designee shall submit on an annual basis one current member of the City Counciltoact as Liaison and attend all Economic Development Commission meetings when possible.The City CouncilLiaison will not have voting rights.Section 4.1 – Appointment of Chairperson Election of Officers The City Council will appoint a chairperson to serve a term of one (1) year. At the first meeting in April of each year, the Economic Development Commission shall hold an organizational meeting. At this meeting, the commission shall elect from its membership a Chairperson and ViceChairperson. Each member shall cast its vote for the member he wishes to be chosen for Chairperson. If no one receives a majority, voting shall continue until one member receives the majority support. ViceChairperson shall be elected from the remaining numbers of the same proceeding. Section 4.2 Duties of the Chairperson and ViceChairperson The Chairperson or in his absence, the ViceChairperson, shall preside at meetings and perform other such duties as ordered by the Economic Development Commission.The Chairperson shall conduct the meeting so as to keep it moving rapidly and as efficiently as possible and shall remind members, witnesses and others to preserve order and decorum and to keep comments to the subject at hand. The Chairperson shall not move for action but may second motions. The amended Economic Development Commission Bylaws are attached. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt the amended Economic Development Commission Bylaws. ATTACHMENTS: Amended Economic Development Commission Bylaws 1 BYLAWS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CITY OF CHANHASSEN The following bylaws are adopted by the Economic Development Commission to facilitate the performance of its duties and the exercising of its functions as a commission established by the City Council on June 10, 2019. SECTION 1 - DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES – ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: 1.1 The Economic Development Commission shall serve as an advisory body to the City Council with the responsibility of researching, reviewing, and making recommendations on issues related to economic development. The Economic Development Commission will review ways in which the city can expand existing businesses, attract desirable new business, and revitalize existing businesses and the community as a whole. All final decisions are to be made by the City Council. 1.2 The Economic Development Commission shall prepare an annual report for the City Council detailing the community development activities of the past year. The report will also provide a summary of residential and commercial construction activities and outline the progress that has been made toward achieving the goals of all strategic plans. 1.3 The Economic Development Commission shall review the Comprehensive Plan and have an understanding of the impacts the Comprehensive Plan has on economic development and commercial/industrial land uses. In addition the Economic Development Commission will review zoning ordinance changes that could impact businesses (commercial, industrial, and mixed-use districts) and all other studies that have an impact on local businesses. 1.4 The Economic Development Commission shall review fee policies as they relate to businesses. 1.5 The Economic Development Commission shall review and consider new or revised approaches to the city’s Economic Development policy. 2 1.6 The Economic Development Commission will review TIF and Tax Abatement applications approved by city council. 1.7 The Economic Development Commission shall review grant applications approved by city council and provide support where needed. 1.8 The City Council at its discretion will set agenda items and goals as deemed necessary by the City Council. SECTION 2 - MEETINGS: 2.1 - Time Regular meetings of the Economic Development Commission shall be held on the second Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 7700 Market Boulevard, unless otherwise directed by the Chairperson, in which case at least 24 hours’ notice will be given to all members. All unfinished business will be carried over to the next regular Economic Development Commission meeting. When the regular meeting day falls on a legal holiday, there shall be no Economic Development Commission meeting. 2.2 - Special Meetings Special meetings shall be held upon a call by the Chairperson or any other member with the concurrence of two other members of the Economic Development Commission, and with at least 48 hours of notice to all members. Notice of all special meetings shall also be posted on the official city bulletin board. 2.3 - Attendance Economic Development Commission members shall attend not less than seventy-five (75%) percent of all regular and special meetings held during a given (calendar) year, and shall not be absent from three (3) consecutive meetings. Failure to meet this minimum attendance requirement will result in removal from the Economic Development Commission. SECTION 3 - COMMISSION COMPOSITION, TERMS AND VACANCIES: 3.1 - Composition 3 The Economic Development Commission shall consist of five (5) voting members. Five (5) members shall be appointed by the City Council and may be removed by the City Council. All members of the Economic Development Commission will have resided or owned a business a minimum of two years in the City of Chanhassen. 3.2 - Terms and Vacancies The City Council shall appoint five (5) members for staggered terms of two (2) 3-year terms and three (3) 2-year terms expiring on March 31 of each year. Vacancies during the term shall be filled by the City Council for the unexpired portion of the term. All members shall serve without compensation. 3.3 - Quorum Three Economic Development Commission members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Whenever a quorum is not present, no final or official action shall be taken at such meeting. 3.4 - City Council Liaison The Mayor or his/her City Council designee shall act as Liaison and attend all Economic Development Commission meetings when possible. The City Council Liaison will not have voting rights. SECTION 4 - ORGANIZATION: 4.1 –Election of Officers At the first meeting in April of each year, the Economic Development Commission shall hold an organizational meeting. At this meeting, the commission shall elect from its membership a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson. Each member shall cast its vote for the member he wishes to be chosen for Chairperson. If no one receives a majority, voting shall continue until one member receives the majority support. Vice-Chairperson shall be elected from the remaining numbers of the same proceeding. 4.2 - Duties of the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson The Chairperson or in his absence, the Vice-Chairperson, shall preside at meetings and perform other such duties as ordered by the Economic Development Commission. The Chairperson shall conduct the meeting so as to keep it moving rapidly and as efficiently as possible and shall remind members, witnesses and others to preserve order and decorum and to keep comments to the subject at hand. The Chairperson shall not move for action but may second motions. 4 SECTION 5 - PROCEDURE: 5.1 - Parliamentary Procedure Parliamentary Procedure governed by Roberts Rules of Order Revised, shall be followed at all regular meetings. At special work session meetings, and when appropriate, the Economic Development Commission may hold group discussions not following any set parliamentary procedures except when motions are before the Economic Development Commission. SECTION 6 - MISCELLANEOUS: 6.1 - Economic Development Commission Discussion a. Matters for discussion, which do not appear on the agenda, may be considered and discussed by the Economic Development Commission under the On-going Items section. b. Matters which appear on the agenda as open discussion items will not be recorded as minutes. 6.2 - Suspension of Rules The Economic Development Commission may suspend any of these rules by a unanimous vote of the members present. 6.3 - Amendments Amendment of these bylaws may be made only by the City Council. 6.4 - Review At the first meeting in April of each year, these bylaws shall be read and adopted by the Economic Development Commission. Chairperson:__________________________________ Date: _______________________ f:\gregs\edc\edc bylaws 2019 edited.docx CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Resolution No. 2019XX: Accept Advertisement for Bids; Award Contract for the Bluff Creek Trail Rehabilitation Project Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.9. Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer File No: 1905 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the low base bid for the Bluff Creek Trail Rehabilitation Project from Northwest Asphalt in the amount of $321,054.50." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The Engineering and Parks departments have worked together to determine the overall condition of the trail surrounding the Bluff Creek Preserve which has declined to the point of necessitating a rehabilitation project. In several areas, tree roots have grown under the trail and created problematic areas. Engineering has also identified several areas where drain tile may be necessary to address high groundwater and areas that drain poorly adjacent to the surrounding wetlands. Culverts under the trail have deteriorated and should be replaced. The Parks department suggested several improvements to assist with the maintenance of the trail. There are sharply curved areas along the existing trail that are being widened or slightly realigned to allow maintenance and plowing vehicles improved access to efficiently perform their tasks. In addition, there are trail connections to the nearby streets that required Engineering to coordinate with existing homeowners in order to facilitate access and trail widening. New ADA accessible pedestrian ramps meeting current standards are being added at the trail connections to the street. DISCUSSION The existing trail is proposed to be reclaimed and the gravel generated by the project will be reused under the trail (i.e. full depth reclamation). A new bituminous trail section built to current city standards will be paved to reestablish the trail surface. Several improvements are being made to address user safety such as removal of some trees that are falling hazards and individual roots that are growing under the trail and creating tripping hazards. Additionally, corrugated metal pipe (CMP) culverts will be replaced and upgraded to reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culverts. The City of Chanhassen partnered with Pioneer Engineering as the design consultant and put together a rehabilitation project and solicited bids from contractors. Bids were opened on Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Six quotes CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 9, 2019SubjectResolution No. 2019XX: Accept Advertisement for Bids; Award Contract for the Bluff CreekTrail Rehabilitation ProjectSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.9.Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer File No: 1905PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the low base bid for the Bluff Creek Trail Rehabilitation Project from Northwest Asphaltin the amount of $321,054.50." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe Engineering and Parks departments have worked together to determine the overall condition of the trailsurrounding the Bluff Creek Preserve which has declined to the point of necessitating a rehabilitation project.In several areas, tree roots have grown under the trail and created problematic areas. Engineering has also identifiedseveral areas where drain tile may be necessary to address high groundwater and areas that drain poorly adjacent tothe surrounding wetlands. Culverts under the trail have deteriorated and should be replaced. The Parks department suggested several improvements to assist with the maintenance of the trail. There are sharplycurved areas along the existing trail that are being widened or slightly realigned to allow maintenance and plowingvehicles improved access to efficiently perform their tasks.In addition, there are trail connections to the nearby streets that required Engineering to coordinate with existinghomeowners in order to facilitate access and trail widening. New ADA accessible pedestrian ramps meeting currentstandards are being added at the trail connections to the street.DISCUSSIONThe existing trail is proposed to be reclaimed and the gravel generated by the project will be reused under the trail (i.e.full depth reclamation). A new bituminous trail section built to current city standards will be paved to reestablish thetrail surface. Several improvements are being made to address user safety such as removal of some trees that arefalling hazards and individual roots that are growing under the trail and creating tripping hazards. Additionally,corrugated metal pipe (CMP) culverts will be replaced and upgraded to reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culverts. The City of Chanhassen partnered with Pioneer Engineering as the design consultant and put together a rehabilitation project and solicited bids from contractors. Bids were opened on Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Six quotes were received as follows for the base bid: 1. Northwest Asphalt $321,054.50 2. Barber Construction $338,525.00 3. Sunram Construction $369,680.75 4. Park Construction $394,919.35 5. Meyer Contracting $415,957.75 6. Valley Paving $422,183.95 The project specifications were to consider award of the contract to the lowest base bidder. A bid alternative (Alt Bid) for approximately 1000 square yards of additional trail improvements was proposed with this project. The six attached bid alternatives were as follows: 1. Northwest Asphalt $36,120.50 2. Barber Construction $36,120.50 3. Park Construction $40,550.10 4. Sunram Construction $41,446.00 5. Meyer Contracting $41,490.50 6. Valley Paving $44,374.40 The low bidder was Northwest Asphalt for the base bid and the bid alternative. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $239,610.75 for the base bid and $27,842.75 for the bid alternative. This 34% difference from the Engineer's Estimate and the low bidder was determined to be due to the Engineer's Estimate utilizing unit prices based on previous year's estimates and not averaging previous year's actual bids, which would have provided a more accurate estimate of current year market rates. Based on the unit prices of the low bidder, staff has determined the bid to be reasonable; however, staff recommends only awarding the contract for the base bid quantity of work in order to remain closer to budget while focusing on rehabilitating the more degraded section of trail. Northwest Asphalt has previously worked for the city on other bituminous surface projects; the most recent being the Orchard Lane Area Reconstruction project (1801). Northwest Asphalt's previous work has been acceptable. Funding is proposed to come from the annual street improvement program. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends accepting the base bid and awarding contract for the Bluff Creek Trail Rehabilitation project (19 05) to Northwest Asphalt. ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tab & Summary Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract Prepared by Henricksen, Erik 8/28/2019 Page 1 Avgerage Average Item Description Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total #Quantity Units Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 Mobilization 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $60,500.00 $60,500.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $56,393.00 $56,393.00 $36,600.00 $36,600.00 $16,225.00 $16,225.00 $42,000.00 $42,000.00 $33,459.71 $33,459.71 2 Bio Logs 2513 LF $2.00 $5,026.00 $4.00 $10,052.00 $2.50 $6,282.50 $3.50 $8,795.50 $3.00 $7,539.00 $3.00 $7,539.00 $4.15 $10,428.95 $3.16 $7,951.85 3 Remove Culvert 67 LF $20.00 $1,340.00 $10.00 $670.00 $15.00 $1,005.00 $20.00 $1,340.00 $122.00 $8,174.00 $82.50 $5,527.50 $64.00 $4,288.00 $47.64 $3,192.07 4 Catch Basin Inlet Protection 4 EA $120.00 $480.00 $145.00 $580.00 $400.00 $1,600.00 $200.00 $800.00 $145.00 $580.00 $107.50 $430.00 $400.00 $1,600.00 $216.79 $867.14 5 Clear and Grub 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $10,200.00 $10,200.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $16,200.00 $16,200.00 $11,271.43 $11,271.43 6 Clear and Grub per Tree 6"-12"8 EA $800.00 $6,400.00 $300.00 $2,400.00 $500.00 $4,000.00 $315.00 $2,520.00 $306.00 $2,448.00 $300.00 $2,400.00 $432.00 $3,456.00 $421.86 $3,374.86 7 Clear and Grub per Tree 12" & Greater 6 EA $1,200.00 $7,200.00 $2,000.00 $12,000.00 $2,000.00 $12,000.00 $2,100.00 $12,600.00 $2,040.00 $12,240.00 $2,000.00 $12,000.00 $2,700.00 $16,200.00 $2,005.71 $12,034.29 8 Trim Tree Limbs 6"-12"1 EA $400.00 $400.00 $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $525.00 $525.00 $510.00 $510.00 $500.00 $500.00 $540.00 $540.00 $567.86 $567.86 9 Trim Tree Limbs 12" & Greater 1 EA $600.00 $600.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $2,040.00 $2,040.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $1,920.00 $1,920.00 10 Subgrade Excavation (For Soft Areas Encountered)50 CY $10.00 $500.00 $30.00 $1,500.00 $20.00 $1,000.00 $78.00 $3,900.00 $56.60 $2,830.00 $182.00 $9,100.00 $105.00 $5,250.00 $68.80 $3,440.00 11 Full Depth Reclamation 6650 SY $3.50 $23,275.00 $2.00 $13,300.00 $1.75 $11,637.50 $5.50 $36,575.00 $11.40 $75,810.00 $7.00 $46,550.00 $5.10 $33,915.00 $5.18 $34,437.50 12 Topsoil Borrow 260 CY $20.00 $5,200.00 $32.00 $8,320.00 $48.00 $12,480.00 $52.00 $13,520.00 $92.20 $23,972.00 $110.50 $28,730.00 $140.00 $36,400.00 $70.67 $18,374.57 13 Seed MnDOT Mix 25-131 7565 SY $0.25 $1,891.25 $1.00 $7,565.00 $0.50 $3,782.50 $0.35 $2,647.75 $0.31 $2,345.15 $0.30 $2,269.50 $0.54 $4,085.10 $0.46 $3,512.32 14 Lawn Sod 1680 SY $7.00 $11,760.00 $10.00 $16,800.00 $10.00 $16,800.00 $7.75 $13,020.00 $7.40 $12,432.00 $7.30 $12,264.00 $10.25 $17,220.00 $8.53 $14,328.00 15 Erosion Control Blanket (Cat. 3N)7565 SY $2.00 $15,130.00 $3.00 $22,695.00 $2.50 $18,912.50 $1.50 $11,347.50 $1.35 $10,212.75 $1.30 $9,834.50 $2.50 $18,912.50 $2.02 $15,292.11 16 18" RCP Class 5 56 LF $31.00 $1,736.00 $60.00 $3,360.00 $100.00 $5,600.00 $105.00 $5,880.00 $139.00 $7,784.00 $160.50 $8,988.00 $120.00 $6,720.00 $102.21 $5,724.00 17 24" RCP Class 3 28 LF $39.00 $1,092.00 $70.00 $1,960.00 $120.00 $3,360.00 $142.00 $3,976.00 $175.00 $4,900.00 $196.50 $5,502.00 $215.00 $6,020.00 $136.79 $3,830.00 18 18" FES w/Trash Guard 2 EA $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,920.00 $3,840.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,025.00 $4,050.00 $2,130.00 $4,260.00 $3,383.00 $6,766.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,136.86 $4,273.71 19 18" FES no Trash Guard 2 EA $900.00 $1,800.00 $1,275.00 $2,550.00 $2,100.00 $4,200.00 $1,550.00 $3,100.00 $1,310.00 $2,620.00 $2,118.00 $4,236.00 $1,300.00 $2,600.00 $1,507.57 $3,015.14 20 24" FES w/Trash Guard 1 EA $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $2,900.00 $2,900.00 $3,200.00 $3,200.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $3,180.00 $3,180.00 $4,776.00 $4,776.00 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $2,965.14 $2,965.14 21 24" FES no Trash Guard 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $1,520.00 $1,520.00 $2,386.00 $2,386.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,772.29 $1,772.29 22 Grout Exiting Pipe at Structure 1 EA $100.00 $100.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $563.00 $563.00 $1,225.00 $1,225.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,269.71 $1,269.71 23 Pipe Foundation 36 CY $35.00 $1,260.00 $50.00 $1,800.00 $40.00 $1,440.00 $130.00 $4,680.00 $175.00 $6,300.00 $174.00 $6,264.00 $100.00 $3,600.00 $100.57 $3,620.57 24 Remove Existing Casting & Replace w/R-3290-A 1 EA $850.00 $850.00 $850.00 $850.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $867.00 $867.00 $1,994.00 $1,994.00 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $1,380.14 $1,380.14 25 Adjust Existing Storm Manhole Castings 1 EA $500.00 $500.00 $750.00 $750.00 $500.00 $500.00 $750.00 $750.00 $895.00 $895.00 $1,499.00 $1,499.00 $850.00 $850.00 $820.57 $820.57 26 Remove Existing Curb & Gutter w/Sawing 73 LF $5.00 $365.00 $14.00 $1,022.00 $19.00 $1,387.00 $21.00 $1,533.00 $17.80 $1,299.40 $21.00 $1,533.00 $28.00 $2,044.00 $17.97 $1,311.91 27 Sawcut Bituminous 71 LF $3.50 $248.50 $4.00 $284.00 $10.00 $710.00 $5.00 $355.00 $7.25 $514.75 $2.00 $142.00 $3.00 $213.00 $4.96 $352.46 28 Remove Existeing Concrete Sidewalk w/Sawing 50 SF $1.00 $50.00 $8.00 $400.00 $20.00 $1,000.00 $10.00 $500.00 $13.10 $655.00 $6.40 $320.00 $16.80 $840.00 $10.76 $537.86 29 Remove Existing Bituminous Pavement 38 SY $4.00 $152.00 $8.00 $304.00 $16.00 $608.00 $28.00 $1,064.00 $19.30 $733.40 $25.50 $969.00 $16.80 $638.40 $16.80 $638.40 30 Class 5 Aggregate Base 334 TON $35.00 $11,690.00 $17.50 $5,845.00 $30.00 $10,020.00 $26.00 $8,684.00 $31.60 $10,554.40 $71.00 $23,714.00 $35.00 $11,690.00 $35.16 $11,742.49 31 Bituminous Wear (MnDOT 2360 SPWEA340B)1150 TON $95.00 $109,250.00 $85.35 $98,152.50 $130.00 $149,500.00 $105.00 $120,750.00 $101.00 $116,150.00 $135.00 $155,250.00 $128.00 $147,200.00 $111.34 $128,036.07 32 Concrete Curb & Gutter 65 LF $30.00 $1,950.00 $85.00 $5,525.00 $50.00 $3,250.00 $90.00 $5,850.00 $84.70 $5,505.50 $87.25 $5,671.25 $43.20 $2,808.00 $67.16 $4,365.68 33 Adjust Gate Valve Box 1 EA $300.00 $300.00 $685.00 $685.00 $500.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $485.00 $485.00 $444.00 $444.00 $1,050.00 $1,050.00 $709.14 $709.14 34 Bituminous Pavement Patching 7 TON $95.00 $665.00 $135.00 $945.00 $300.00 $2,100.00 $325.00 $2,275.00 $307.00 $2,149.00 $477.00 $3,339.00 $275.00 $1,925.00 $273.43 $1,914.00 35 Pedestrian Curb Ramp w/Plates 4 EA $2,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,850.00 $15,400.00 $3,200.00 $12,800.00 $3,500.00 $14,000.00 $3,380.00 $13,520.00 $3,310.00 $13,240.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 $2,962.86 $11,851.43 36 Type 3 Barricades 7 EA $300.00 $2,100.00 $250.00 $1,750.00 $250.00 $1,750.00 $450.00 $3,150.00 $143.00 $1,001.00 $140.00 $980.00 $270.00 $1,890.00 $257.57 $1,803.00 37 Street Sweeping 10 HR $120.00 $1,200.00 $135.00 $1,350.00 $100.00 $1,000.00 $200.00 $2,000.00 $153.00 $1,530.00 $135.00 $1,350.00 $180.00 $1,800.00 $146.14 $1,461.43 TOTALS $239,610.75 $321,054.50 $338,525.00 $369,680.75 $394,919.35 $415,957.75 $422,183.95 $357,418.86 Denotes Corrected Value Bluff Creek Trail Rehabilitation (Base Bid) Bid Tabulation and Comparison Northwest BarberEngineer's Estimate Sunram Meyer Valley PavingPark Prepared by Henricksen, Erik 8/28/2019 Page 1 Avgerage Average Item Description Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total #Quantity Units Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price ALT 1 Catch Basin Inlet Protection (Street)1 EA $120.00 $120.00 $165.00 $165.00 $400.00 $400.00 $220.00 $220.00 $144.00 $144.00 $107.50 $107.50 $400.00 $400.00 $222.36 $222.36 ALT 2 Full Depth Reclamation 1020 SY $3.50 $3,570.00 $4.00 $4,080.00 $2.00 $2,040.00 $8.00 $8,160.00 $10.30 $10,506.00 $7.90 $8,058.00 $5.10 $5,202.00 $5.83 $5,945.14 ALT 3 Topsoil Borrow 40 CY $20.00 $800.00 $36.00 $1,440.00 $40.00 $1,600.00 $100.00 $4,000.00 $92.20 $3,688.00 $78.75 $3,150.00 $140.00 $5,600.00 $72.42 $2,896.86 ALT 4 Seed MnDOT Mix 25-131 685 SY $0.25 $171.25 $1.50 $1,027.50 $2.00 $1,370.00 $0.60 $411.00 $0.51 $349.35 $0.50 $342.50 $0.54 $369.90 $0.84 $577.36 ALT 5 Lawn Sod 680 SY $7.00 $4,760.00 $14.00 $9,520.00 $13.00 $8,840.00 $8.00 $5,440.00 $7.40 $5,032.00 $7.30 $4,964.00 $10.25 $6,970.00 $9.56 $6,503.71 ALT 6 Erosion Control Blanket (Cat. 3N)685 SY $2.00 $1,370.00 $4.00 $2,740.00 $2.50 $1,712.50 $2.00 $1,370.00 $1.35 $924.75 $1.30 $890.50 $2.50 $1,712.50 $2.24 $1,531.46 ALT 7 Sawcut Bituminous 9 LF $3.50 $31.50 $10.00 $90.00 $20.00 $180.00 $25.00 $225.00 $38.00 $342.00 $2.00 $18.00 $10.00 $90.00 $15.50 $139.50 ALT 8 Bituminous Weare (MnDOT 2360 SPWEA340B)176 TON $95.00 $16,720.00 $95.50 $16,808.00 $130.00 $22,880.00 $120.00 $21,120.00 $110.00 $19,360.00 $135.00 $23,760.00 $135.00 $23,760.00 $117.21 $20,629.71 ALT 9 Type 3 Barricades 1 EA $300.00 $300.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $500.00 $500.00 $204.00 $204.00 $200.00 $200.00 $270.00 $270.00 $282.00 $282.00 TOTALS $27,842.75 $36,120.50 $39,272.50 $41,446.00 $40,550.10 $41,490.50 $44,374.40 $38,728.11 Denotes Corrected Value Bluff Creek Trail Rehabilitation (Alt Bid) Bid Tabulation and Comparison Northwest BarberEngineer's Estimate Sunram Meyer Valley PavingPark CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: September 9, 2019 RESOLUTION NO: 2019-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE BLUFF CREEK TRAIL REHABILITATION PROJECT 19-05 WHEREAS, pursuant to an ad for bids for the Bluff Creek Trail Rehabilitation project, six bids were received and opened. The bids are as follows: AND WHEREAS, Northwest Asphalt is the lowest responsible bidder with a total base bid amount of $321,054.50. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Northwest Asphalt in the name of the City of Chanhassen for the Bluff Creek Trail Rehabilitation project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the city clerk. 2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 9th day of September, 2019. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT Bidder Total Bid 1. Northwest Asphalt $321,054.50 2. Barber Construction $338,525.00 3. Sunram Construction $369,680.75 4. Park Construction $394,919.35 5. Meyer Contracting $415,957.75 6. Valley Paving $422,183.95 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Consider a Site Plan Review with Variance for Chanhassen Butcher for Property Located at 590 West 79th Street Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.10. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 201908 PROPOSED MOTION City Council approves the restaurant expansion to include two exterior patios of 900 and 677 square feet with a variance to permit the addition of 946 square feet of hardcover to permit 73 percent hardcover, subject to the conditions of the Planning Commission staff report, and adopts the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Site Plan Review request with a variance for hard cover for expansion of restaurant to add two exterior seasonal patios of 900 and 677 square feet, one with a partial roof cover.The 630 square feet of roof and the additional sidewalks on site exceed the approved hardcover for the parcel. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 3, 2019 to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 5 0 to approve a motion recommending approval of the project. The only discussion was that there was sufficient parking to accommodate this use with the other restaurant uses in the area, which is accomplished through the crossaccess and crossparking agreements with the Crossroads Plaza development. A secondary issue was that people would exit the site along the south sidewalk and immediately cross the street to the proposed West 79th Street parking lot, rather than proceeding to either of the designated cross walk areas. The Planning Commission minutes for September 3, 2019 are attached to this report. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of Site Plan #201908 to permit the construction of two exterior patios with a variance to permit an additional 946 square feet of hardcover for a total of 73 percent hardcover, plans prepared by CNH Architects dated 8/22/19, and Westwood dated 8/20/19, subject to the conditions of the Planning Commission staff report and adoption of the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 9, 2019SubjectConsider a Site Plan Review with Variance for Chanhassen Butcher for Property Located at 590West 79th StreetSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.10.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 201908PROPOSED MOTIONCity Council approves the restaurant expansion to include two exterior patios of 900 and 677 square feet with avariance to permit the addition of 946 square feet of hardcover to permit 73 percent hardcover, subject to theconditions of the Planning Commission staff report, and adopts the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYSite Plan Review request with a variance for hard cover for expansion of restaurant to add two exterior seasonalpatios of 900 and 677 square feet, one with a partial roof cover.The 630 square feet of roof and the additionalsidewalks on site exceed the approved hardcover for the parcel.BACKGROUNDThe Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 3, 2019 to review the proposed development. ThePlanning Commission voted 5 0 to approve a motion recommending approval of the project. The only discussionwas that there was sufficient parking to accommodate this use with the other restaurant uses in the area, which isaccomplished through the crossaccess and crossparking agreements with the Crossroads Plaza development. Asecondary issue was that people would exit the site along the south sidewalk and immediately cross the street to theproposed West 79th Street parking lot, rather than proceeding to either of the designated cross walk areas.The Planning Commission minutes for September 3, 2019 are attached to this report.RECOMMENDATIONStaff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of Site Plan #201908 to permit the construction of twoexterior patios with a variance to permit an additional 946 square feet of hardcover for a total of 73 percent hardcover, plans prepared by CNH Architects dated 8/22/19, and Westwood dated 8/20/19, subject to the conditions of the Planning Commission staff report and adoption of the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Staff Report w/attachments Planning Commission Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, September 3, 2019 Subject Consider a Request for Site Plan Review with a Variance for Hard Cover for Expansion of a Restaurant located at 590 West 79th Street Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: C.1. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 201908 PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the restaurant expansion to include two exterior patios of 900 and 677 square feet with a variance to permit the addition of 946 square feet of hardcover to permit 73 percent hardcover subject to the conditions of the staff report; and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST Consider Site Plan Review request with a variance for hard cover for expansion of restaurant to add two exterior seasonal patios, one with a partial roof cover with a variance for hard cover. APPLICANT Chanhassen Butcher, LLC and Chanhassen West 79th Street, LLC SITE INFORMATION PRESENT ZONING: Highway and Business Services District, BH LAND USE:Commercial ACREAGE: 1.24 acres (54,014 SF) DENSITY: F.A.R. 0.14 APPLICATION REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article 2, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article 2, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XVII, “BH” Highway and Business Services District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and OfficeInstitutional Developments PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, September 3, 2019SubjectConsider a Request for Site Plan Review with a Variance for Hard Cover for Expansion of aRestaurant located at 590 West 79th StreetSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: C.1.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 201908PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the restaurant expansion to includetwo exterior patios of 900 and 677 square feet with a variance to permit the addition of 946 square feet ofhardcover to permit 73 percent hardcover subject to the conditions of the staff report; and adopts the Findings ofFact and Recommendation.SUMMARY OF REQUESTConsider Site Plan Review request with a variance for hard cover for expansion of restaurant to add two exteriorseasonal patios, one with a partial roof cover with a variance for hard cover.APPLICANTChanhassen Butcher, LLC and Chanhassen West 79th Street, LLCSITE INFORMATIONPRESENT ZONING: Highway and Business Services District, BHLAND USE:CommercialACREAGE: 1.24 acres (54,014 SF) DENSITY: F.A.R. 0.14 APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 20, Article 2, Division 3, VariancesChapter 20, Article 2, Division 6, Site Plan ReviewChapter 20, Article XVII, “BH” Highway and Business Services District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and OfficeInstitutional Developments BACKGROUND On February 26, 1996, City Council approved a site plan for a 5,500 squarefoot restaurant with a five percent hardcover variance to permit 70 percent hardcover, and denied a variance to permit two wall signs. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Site Plan #201908 to permit the construction of two exterior patios with a variance to permit an additional 946 square feet of hardcover for a total of 73 percent hardcover, plans prepared by CNH Architects dated 8/22/19, and Westwood dated 8/20/19, subject to the conditions of the staff report; and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact Development Review Application Project Narrative ALTA Survey Grading and Drainage Plan Floor Plan and Building Elevation W. 79th Street Parking Lot Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing List CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: September 3, 2019 CC DATE: September 9, 2019 REVIEW DEADLINE: October 1, 2019 CASE #: 2019-08 BY: RG, EH, DN, JS, ET SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Consider Site Plan Review request with a variance for hard cover for expansion of restaurant to add two exterior seasonal patios, one with a partial roof cover with a variance for hard cover. LOCATION: 590 W. 79th Street Lot 4, Block 1, Crossroads Plaza 3rd Addition, Carver County, Minnesota PID 252490040 APPLICANT: Chanhassen Butcher, LLC Chanhassen West 79th Street, LLC 14663 Quebec Place 8560 Kelzer Pond Drive Savage, MN 55378 Victoria, MN 55386 (651) 331-0620 (612) 439-4632 loneoakmarket@gmail.com andymcconville@solomonre.com PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the restaurant expansion to include two exterior patios of 900 and 677 square feet with a variance to permit the addition of 946 square feet of hardcover to permit 73 percent hardcover subject to the conditions of the staff report, and adopts the findings of fact and recommendation.” 590 W. 79th Street, Planning Case 2019-08 September 3, 2019 Page 2 PRESENT ZONING: Highway and Business Services District, BH 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial ACREAGE: 1.24 acres (54,014 sq. ft.) DENSITY: F.A.R. 0.14 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city’s discretion in approving or denying a Site Plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a Variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY Site Plan Review request with a variance for hard cover for expansion of restaurant to add two exterior seasonal patios of 900 and 677 square feet, one with a partial roof cover. The 630 square feet of roof and the additional sidewalks on site exceed the approved hardcover for the parcel. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article 2, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article 2, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XVII, “BH” Highway and Business Services District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office- Institutional Developments BACKGROUND On February 26, 1996, City Council approved a site plan for a 5,500 square foot restaurant with a five percent hardcover variance to permit 70 percent hardcover and denied a variance to permit two wall signs. On November 13, 1995, City Council approved preliminary and final plat to replat Lot 2, Block 1, Crossroads Plaza 2nd Addition into four lots and site plan review for a 7,742 square foot Tires Plus facility on Lot 1, Block 1, Crossroads Plaza 3rd Addition. 590 W. 79th Street, Planning Case 2019-08 September 3, 2019 Page 3 On March 9, 1992, City Council approved Crossroads Plaza 2nd Addition, which replatted Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Crossroads Plaza Addition into two lots, and site plan review for an 11,468 square foot bank and office building for Americana Bank on Lot 1, Block 1, Crossroads Plaza 2nd Addition. On February 12, 1989, City Council approve preliminary and final plat for Crossroads Plaza Addition creating two lots and four outlots. Two of the outlots were used for Highway 5 right- of-way and two of the outlots were used for stormwater ponds. SITE CONSTRAINTS Wetland Protection There is not a wetland located on the property. Bluff Protection There are no bluffs on the property. Shoreland Management The property is not located within a shoreland overlay district. Floodplain Overlay This property is not within a designated FEMA floodplain. SITE PLAN REVIEW The applicant is proposing the addition of two patio decks of 900 and 677 square feet. Since staff may only approve a 10 percent increase to an approved site plan (Section 20-108, Chanhassen City Code), the proposed expansion requires site plan review and approval. Additionally, while the decks do not count against hardcover since they permit water to pass through to the ground underneath, the applicant is proposing a roof over 630 square feet of the attached deck on the south side of the building. This roof area and the additional sidewalks for the property will increase the hardcover by 946 square feet or three percent to 73.1 percent hardcover. The applicant prepared a schematic of how they could potentially meet the hardcover requirements. However in order to do so, they would remove four parking stalls on site. The removal of parking spaces is not in the best interest of the business nor the city. 590 W. 79th Street, Planning Case 2019-08 September 3, 2019 Page 4 ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size Portion Placement Access to the building is through the existing entrance in the northwest corner of the building. Material and Detail The building is made of reddish-brown brick. The decks will be built of wood with a black, standing seam roof over 70 percent of the south patio deck. Color The decks shall be brown. The fencing around the patio as well as the railing at the deck will both be decorative prefinished metal picket fence style in black. A black, standing seam metal roof will be added above the south patio. Height and Roof Design A black, standing seam metal roof is being added over 70 percent of the proposed southern patio. Facade Transparency The proposed expansion are for open sided patio decks, which are visible from the public right- of-way. Site Furnishing Tables, chairs and umbrellas will be used on the exterior patio decks. Loading Areas, Refuse Area, Etc. Screening of refuse and waste containers is in the enclosure on the east side of the building. Lot Frontage and Parking location Parking is located on the north side of the building. Additionally, there are cross access and parking agreements with the other parcels in the Crossroads development. 590 W. 79th Street, Planning Case 2019-08 September 3, 2019 Page 5 ACCESS Vehicular access to the proposed “Tequila Butcher” site, located at 590 W. 79th Street, currently exists via a shared commercial driveway through the eastern property line. There are cross access agreements with all the abutting properties including the Walgreen’s site to the west via an internal driveway connecting the properties. No improvements to the existing vehicular access have been proposed with the applicant’s submittal, while pedestrian access improvements to the site have been proposed. The applicant is proposing the removal of the existing western sidewalk access point and the addition of two new sidewalk access points: one is located at the southwest corner of the south patio and will provide egress to the new north-south sidewalk; the other is located on the west side of the building providing north/south access from the existing public sidewalk located near the southern property line to the main building. The north/south access sidewalk will also be the main pedestrian route to and from a future parking lot located across W. 79th Street. All accessibility barriers (e.g. stairs) should be removed and the sidewalks proposed should be fully ADA compliant. EASEMENTS There exists 20-foot public drainage and utility easements on the south and east property lines (abutting W. 79th Street and the private drive, respectively), and 5-foot public drainage and utility easements on the west and north property lines. The applicant is proposing the installation of fencing and private sidewalks within the public drainage and utility easements and will be required to file for an encroachment agreement with building permits. There are numerous private easements that affect the subject property as identified by the ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey provided by the applicant. There are cross access and parking agreements with the other parcels in the Crossroads development. The applicant is required to ensure all terms, conditions and obligations of these easements are met prior to construction. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Minimal site grading is proposed for the proposed expansion. The site is currently developed and grading will be limited to the installation of new sidewalks discussed under the ACCESS section of this report, as the patios will be installed as decking. Grading will require erosion control measures and best management practices (BMPs) be installed. Upon submittal of construction plans for building permits, the applicant shall update the grading plan to include the location of silt fence, bio rolls, concrete washouts, inlet protections, and any other erosion and sediment control BMPs that will be used during construction. The applicant is proposing to improve the existing structure with the installation of two patios. Patio B is completely uncovered, and Patio A has approximately 630 square feet of cover. Including the additional sidewalks (534 square feet), the increase to impervious surface will be 590 W. 79th Street, Planning Case 2019-08 September 3, 2019 Page 6 1094 square feet. However, with a reduction of impervious area of 218 square feet from the removal of the western sidewalk access, the total net increase to impervious area is proposed to be 946 square feet. UTILITIES The site is currently served by existing sanitary and water services, however, the site plan does not show existing utilities on or around the property. The applicant will be required to update plans to illustrate the locations of services and include a note on the plans to call 811 for locates prior to any work being performed. No changes to the existing utilities has been proposed at this time. LANDSCAPING The applicant is required by ordinance to provide landscaping around the exterior of the building as well as along the public right-of-way. These items are required with or without approval of the variance. Required Proposed Frontage road boulevard trees 5 trees 5 trees The applicant meets ordinance requirements for landscaping. However, rather than providing a rain garden, the applicant shall plant an additional tree, such as a Freeman Maple, in this location. 590 W. 79th Street, Planning Case 2019-08 September 3, 2019 Page 7 LIGHTING/SIGNAGE Parking lot lighting is currently in place. A new wall sign and shared monument sign are allowed. A separate sign permit is required for each sign. Signage must comply with the sign criteria for the BH District. MISCELLANEOUS Remodel of interior will require separate fire sprinkler, fire alarm, and kitchen hood suppression system permits. Sprinklers will possibly be required under the exterior covered patio ceiling. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Building plans must include a code analysis that contains the following information: Key plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext. walls, Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. COMPLIANCE TABLE Code Project Building Height two-stories one-story NA feet 21 feet to top of parapet Building Setback N - 20' E - 10' N - 141' E – 19.5' W - 10' S - 25' W - 97' S –25’ Parking Stalls 124 stalls 136 stalls (Standards: restaurant full liquor 1/50 sq. ft. 5,806/50 = 116; patios 1/200 sq. ft. 1,577/200 = 8) Parking Setback N - 0' E - 0' N - 0' E - 0' W - 0' S - 10' W - 0' S - 0' Hard Surface Coverage 65% @ 73% # Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft. 54,014 sq. ft. (1.24 ac.) @ - A variance to permit 70 percent hardcover was approved by the city in 1996. # - A variance request to increase the hardcover by 946 square feet to permit 73 percent hardcover is incorporated in the request. 590 W. 79th Street, Planning Case 2019-08 September 3, 2019 Page 8 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Site Plan #2019-08 to permit the construction of two exterior patios with a variance to permit an additional 946 square feet of hardcover for a total of 73 percent hardcover, plans prepared by CNH Architects dated 8/22/19, and Westwood dated 8/20/19, subject to the following conditions: Building 1. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 2. Building plans must include a code analysis that contains the following information: Key plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext. walls, Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. 3. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. Engineering 1. All newly proposed pedestrian access routes shall be ADA compliant. 2. An Encroachment Agreement Application shall be filed for any structures places in public drainage and utility easements. 3. Grading plans shall be updated to include erosion control Best Management Practices upon submittal of building permits. 4. Site plan shall be updated upon submittal of building permits to include: a. Legend b. Engineering scale c. Vicinity map d. Existing utilities (and services) e. Detail plates f. Call 811 notes Fire 1. Remodel of interior will require separate fire sprinkler, fire alarm, and kitchen hood suppression system permits. 2. Sprinklers will possibly be required under exterior covered patio ceiling. Planning 1. The applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The applicant shall install an additional over-story tree to the southeast of the south deck. 590 W. 79th Street, Planning Case 2019-08 September 3, 2019 Page 9 ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact 2. Development Review Application 3. Project Narrative 4. ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey 5. Tequila Butcher Schematic Site Plan by CNH Architects 6. Grading and Drainage Plan by Westwood 7. West 79th Street Parking Lot 8. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List g:\plan\2019 planning cases\19-08 tequila butcher - applebees site 590 w. 79th street\staff report tequila butcher.doc 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Chanhassen Butcher, LLC and Chanhassen West 79th Street, LLC for Site Plan review with a variance for hardcover. On September 3, 2019, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Chanhassen Butcher, LLC and Chanhassen West 79th Street, LLC for Site Plan Review to add exterior patio decks of 677 square feet and 900 square feet to a one-story restaurant building with a variance to the site hardcover on the property located at 590 W. 79th Street. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use and site plan, which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH). 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Commercial uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 4, Block 1, Crossroads Plaza 3rd Addition, Carver County, Minnesota 4. Site Plan. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a. The proposed development, an expansion on the existing restaurant development of the property, is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. The proposed development is consistent with the site plan review requirements and meets all the specifications of City Code subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval and approval of the hard cover variance; c. The proposed development will preserve portions of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed areas; 2 d. The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. The proposed development creates functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and the general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. The proposed development protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 5. Variance – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The zoning of the property limits hard cover to 65 percent. As originally approved, the site was given a variance to permit a restaurant with a liquor license, which requires a significant amount of parking, relative to other commercial uses. Had the property been located north of the railroad tracks, there would not be a hardcover limitation and no variance would be required. The use is a permitted use in the zoning district. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. “Practical difficulties”, as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable 3 manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The proposed patio area is consistent with other restaurant uses in the community. By adding the roof over the southerly patio, they created additional hardcover. In addition, the city is requiring that they install more sidewalks on the site, further increasing the hardcover. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations, but allows for a restaurant operation consistent with their business model. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property is located in a zoning district that has severe limitations on hardcover, but permits uses that require significant parking standards. The proposed development has a floor area ratio (F.A.R.) of only 0.14. Normally, commercial uses have a F.A.R. of 0.2 or higher. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The proposed patios are very similar to the patios on the restaurants directly to the east of the site. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 6. The planning report #2019-10 dated September 3, 2019, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. 4 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan with variance for hardcover subject to the conditions of the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 3rd day of September, 2019. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY:___________________________________ Steven Weick, Chairman g:\plan\2019 planning cases\19-08 tequila butcher - applebees site 590 w. 79th street\findings of fact tequila butcher.docx avI9 -0y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT anning Division— P.O. 147 nhard CITY OF CILANHASSENMailingAddress— O. Box 147,Chanhassen,MN 55317110 11 Phone:(952)227-1300 I Fax:(952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Oats (3I-l lPC Oats.ClI '3 i CC Dat. I x. 1 Int 60-Day Review Date:16( I I I C'i Section 1: Application Type (cheek all that apply) lRefor tot,*aop"t>Fviare Appr.'cahen Chocei sf for required subrmtar rntormorron thol must occonglany this opplratron) Comprehensive Plan Amendment 5600 0 Subdivision(SUB) Minor MUSA line for fading on-site sewers $100 Create 3 lots or less 300 Conditional Use Permit(CUP) E Create over 3 lots 600+S15 per lot lots) Single-Family Residence 325 Metes&Bounds(2 lots) 300 All Others 5425 0 Consolidate Lots 150 Intenm Use Permit(IUP) Lot Line Adjustment 5750000 FinalPlal In conjunction with Single-Family Residence.,$325 Includes$450 escrow for attorney costs)' O All Others 425 Adddoonal escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract Rezoning(REZ) Planned Unit Development(PUD) S750 0 Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way NAG) $300 Minor Amendment to existing PUD 100 Addiuohal recording fess may apply) D All Others S500 0 Variance(VAR) 200 Sign Plan Review S150 0 Wetland Alteration Permit(WAP) Site Plan Review(SPR) Single-Family Residence 5150 Administrative 100 All Others 5275 O Commercialllndustnal Dislricts' 500 Zoning Appeal S100 Plus 510 per 1.000 square feet of building area: 5 thousand square feet) o Zoning Ordinance Amendment(20A) S500 incluse number of vxisSnq employees' Include numnet of new employees NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, Residential Districts 5500 the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. Plus$5 per dwelling unit( units) 0 Notification Sign jCdy to instar and remove) 200 0 Property Owners'List within 500'(City to generate atter pre-applicabn meeting) 3 per address 13 addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents(check all that apply) S50 per document Conditional Use Permit 0 Interim Use Permit Site Plan Agreement 0 Vacation Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Metes&Bounds Subdivision(3 docs.) Easements( easements) 0 Deeds S1,039TOTALFEE: Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Expansion of restaurant to add 2 extortor seasonal patios,one with a partial root cover. 590 79th Street West Properly Address or Location: Parcel,y: 252490040 Legal Description: Lot 4,Block 1 Crossroads Plaza 3rd Addition Total Acreage 1 24 acres Wetlands Present? Yes 0 No Present Zoning.Select One Requested Zoning: Select One Present Land Use Designation:Select One Requested Land Use Oesignalton: Select One Existing Use of Property: Restaurant OCheck box if separate narrative Is attached Scanned by CamScanner 1 Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER:to signing this application.I.as applicant,represent to have obta.ned authonza:on from the arc:t ny owner to file this application.I agree to be bound by Conditions of approval.subject Ally to the right to object at me heanngs on the application or dunng the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner I have attached separate documentation of fa legal capacity to file the application This application should ae processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this app'ca:ron I v ill keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of malenal ano the progress of th s application, I further understand that add tonal lees may be charged for consulting fees.feasibility studies,etc.with an estimate prior to any authonzat on to proceed with the study. I ertify that the information and exhibits su tried are tru nd correct. Name: (, \ci,\i‘o4le.,-, laAtL,c ILL Sri p 1-Ft d4) Contact* s Address. is . _ Phone: C251 ?. S5_0(e C:ty State:Zip , 4 0.SS t Cell: ( 5 Ot% Email 10,e, a Ito/ t fain Fax: Signature: Dale: 0)11 PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application,I,as property owner,have full legal capacity to.and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions.subject only to the right to object at the hearings or dunng the appeal periods.I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. 1 further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees,feasibility studies.etc.with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify thatfthe information and exhibits submittedl_ are true and correct. Name:C:h t i e a ? J Tri T G' Contact: G/- g 1,4,d tk Address:_ B,jbC1 ` ,../"...e.,--- /i.A.,tt.Y,Phone:1 Cyd,-d3`7-41C 301 City'Slate/Zip: 14 c./v/i i rel 53-3J C Cell: I( Email: y r.c yi?tcccire_ @.a1iFax: 4, 5; f7/71i_.,ettSignature: l10- 1,de,eve\ Date: P. /'r ThisThis application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application,refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ARCHITECT if applicable) Name: CNH Architects Contact: Quinn Hutson Address' 7300 W 147th Street,Suite 504 Phone: 952)431-4433 CnyfStatefZ p: Apple Valley,MN 55124 Cell: 612) 790-7943 Email: ehulson a©cnharch.com Fax: N/A Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? Other Contact Information: Q Properly Owner Via Q Email 0 Mailed Paper Copy Name: E] Applicant Via Q Email 0 Mailed Paper Copy Address: CI Engineer Via: CI Email Mailed Paper Copy City/Slate/Zip: Other' Via: Email Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields,then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing.SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM Scanned by CamScanner 7300 WEST 147TH STREETSUITE 504APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124-7580(952) 431-4433 August 16, 2019 Project Narrative: Tequila Butcher Restaurant . The Tequila Butcher Restaurant is a proposed remodeling and patio expansion of the former Applebee’s Restaurant at 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen. The restaurant will be locally owned and operated by the same family as Burgers & Bottles, Volstead House, Bourbon Butcher, and Whiskey Inferno all popular restaurants around the south metro. The project site is located in the Crossroads Plaza development accessed off West 79th Street just east of Market Boulevard one block north of Highway 5. The property is a 1.24 acre existing restaurant and parking lot site. The property is zoned BH – Highway and Business Services District as are the properties surrounding the site. The current and proposed restaurant is an allowed use within this zoning district. The existing restaurant has a gross floor area of 5,792 square feet and will remain the same size with remodeling of interior finishes and layout to create the new restaurant image. There will be two proposed exterior patios added to the site to provide 132 seats of seasonal guest seating for the restaurant, an amenity that is not currently provided with the former restaurant building. The west patio will be at grade near the front entrance of the restaurant and will include a yard game enclosure. The second patio will be attached to a portion of the south side of the building and will be raised above grade level with the restaurant floor height in this area. This attached patio will include a 630 square foot portion of the seating covered by a new canopy roof. Parking for the restaurant and expanded seasonal patio seating calculates to a minimum requirement of 124 stalls. The current parking provided, including the new stalls to be added along 79th Street, is a total of 136 stalls resulting in 12 stalls more than the minimum ordinance requirement. The new patios will all be constructed with wood deck framing and composite decking allowing rainwater to flow through the deck in order to not increase the impervious surface of this overall site. However, the new canopy roof and required added sidewalks provide a net additional impervious surface of 1,094 square feet. This increase in impervious surface brings the site total impervious surface to 72.7% which is slightly over the maximum allowed ordinance amount of 70%. The calculations indicate that the current impervious surface is already slightly over the ordinance maximum by 375 square feet. The new canopy and sidewalk will add an additional 719 square feet of net impervious surface, still only 2.7% total area over the ordinance. To address this slight additional impervious surface the project is requesting a variance to the impervious surface maximum allowed by city ordinance. Initially the restaurant considered removing four parking stalls to compensate for the additional impervious surface which would still result in more parking stalls than ordinance minimums, however the consensus is that removing parking stalls is counter-productive with the overall goal of adding parking for the Crossroads Plaza center in general, especially when the overage is such a small percentage of the allowed amount. The following items identify why this variance would meet the findings as required for granting a variance. a. This variance will remain consistent with the comprehensive plan and the general purpose of the ordinance. Parking lot pavement will not be increased but only a decorative canopy over a portion of the attached patio. Further the rainwater from this canopy roof will be collected by a gutter and run into a rain garden area in the adjacent landscaped area, not into the storm sewer system. b. The practical difficulty is the intent to increase parking for the overall development. As noted above, if the project offset the impervious surface overage by reducing parking stalls, the project would be in compliance with both the impervious surface amount and the minimum parking for the restaurant including seasonal patios. However, due to the broader shortage of parking stalls in this overall area, the variance addresses the existing conditions to increase total parking stalls in the district. c. The variance is based on a broader parking availability concern, not on economic considerations. d. The shortage of parking is not based on this restaurant but is a result of the conditions in the broader area. e. The increase in impervious surface will not change the character of the locality, in fact the project will enhance the neighborhood by expanding landscaping and providing additional seasonal outdoor dining for residents of the region. The existing building exterior is finished with brick, glass, prefinished metal standing seam accent roofs, and a limestone clad entrance tower. The new attached patio will have a pre-finished metal standing seam canopy roof, stained cedar colored wood deck framing, and a prefinished metal picket railing to match the picket fencing added to the site. This canopy will fit well with the existing building massing and enhance the south side of the building facing 79th Street as shown in the provided colored elevation. New landscaping is also shown including overstory trees along 79th Street and extensive additional base plantings along both new patios including 100 added shrubs and perennials. The civil engineering drawings indicate the minor grading for this project. The stormwater impacts were reviewed by the watershed district and the impacts are sufficiently minor to not require a watershed permit. In essence, there is no change to parking lot stormwater impacts and the minor stormwater addition from the patio canopy is directed to a rain garden area. In conclusion, the proposed Tequila Butcher restaurant provides for an exciting new dining option for the Chanhassen residents as well as guests from around the region. The added seasonal outdoor patio seating provides a great location to enjoy dining outside and creates an upgraded image between the new patios and extensive landscaping. On behalf of Tequila Butcher, we are pleased to have this opportunity to bring this new restaurant to Chanhassen. Sincerely, Quinn S. Hutson, AIA, LEED AP Principal CNH Architects, Inc. Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 FO EX-MHRE = 945.71 EX-MHRE = 945.60 950947948949951950950949949951951 952 950949951952953 950 947 94 8 94 9950 947948 949 946 947950.91 Existinglandscaping Existing lands c a p i n g Existinglandscaping Proposed CoveredPatio with Roof 630 SFProposed Uncovered Patio 270 SF Patio 'A' Patio 'B' ProposedUncoveredPatio 677 SF Walk-ins Existing landscaping Property Line Drainage and UtilityEasement per the platof Crossroads Plaza3rd Addtion Roof above Existing sidewalk ProposedFenced Area Existing RestaurantBuilding Existing lands c a p i n g Existing sign ProposedSidewalk331 SF Proposed new sidewalk 133 SF 951.3 951.3 951.1 951.1 951.1 951.1 952.3 952.3 952.3 952.3 949.8-4.0% -2.0%(TYP.)948.7 G 950.5 G 950.5 G 950.0 G951.1 G 951.1 951.1 G 950.0 947.6 949.7 946.6 950.7 G 950.6 G-4.0% -2.0%(TYP.) S TO S TO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STOST ST ST ST O ST O ST O STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTO P:\Projects\2019\19064\Central\19064-ChanhassenRestaurant_qhutson@cnharch-CNH-LOGO-556336.jpg1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 A B C D E F G H J K L M A B C D E F G H J K L M © COPYRIGHT BY CNH ARCHITECTS, INC.7300 WEST 147TH STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124-7580 (952) 431-4433CNH NO.: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 REVISIONS: DATE:8/19/2019 12:33:10 PM.C1Tequila Butcher590 West 79th StreetChanhassen, MN 5531719064 08/16/19 Drainage and Grading PlanPhone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0'20'40'60' 1"=20' 952.3950.6 G PROPERTY LINE 982 980 STORM SEWER EXISTING PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL CONTOUR982 980 SPOT ELEVATION (G = GROUND) FLOW DIRECTION CURB AND GUTTER GRADING LEGEND 0.00%N:\0020082.00\dwg\0020082C-GRAD.dwgDATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTADANIEL M. PARKS08/19/201918919 UP Existing brick soldier course; paint black Prefinished metal standing-seam patio roof Prefinished metal gutter and fascia Solid wood column and braces, stain Prefinished metal picket railing Wood deck framing, stain Existing brick walls Back Bar Host Stand Waiting Vestibule 101 Bar/Dining Room 102 Private Event Space 103 Kitchen 104 Women's Restoom 105 Men's Restroom 106 Existing roof above 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 A B C D E F G H J K L M A B C D E F G H J K L M © COPYRIGHT BY CNH ARCHITECTS, INC.7300 WEST 147TH STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124-7580 (952) 431-4433CNH NO.: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 REVISIONS: DATE:C:\REVIT (local)\2019\19064 - Chanhassen Restaurant_AKlis.rvt8/14/2019 11:24:04 AMCITY SUBMITTAL CS02Tequila Butcher590 West 79th StreetChanhassen, MN 5531719064 08/14/19 Floor/Furniture Plan and Exterior Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"CS02 A1 South Elevation - Colored 1/8" = 1'-0"CS02 E8 Floor/Furniture Plan TTGEWESTST R E E T79THMARKET BOULEVARDARBORETUM BOULEVARD (MN STATE HIGHWAY 5)APPLEBEE'SN:\0020082.00\DWG\CIVIL\PARKING\0020082CV01.DWG WEST 79TH ST. PARKING LOT © 2019 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.CONSTRUCTION PLANSWEST 79TH ST. PARKING LOTCHANHASSEN, MNPREPARED FOR:SOLOMON REAL ESTATE GROUP8560 KELZER POND DRIVEVICTORIA, MN 55386CONTACT: JAY SCOTTPHONE: 651.336.6060EMAIL: JAYSCOTT@SOLOMONRE.COMFORFORSITE & GRADINGPREPARED BY:PROJECT NUMBER: 0020082.00CONTACT: DANIEL M. PARKSPhone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150CONSTRUCTION PLANSWEST 79TH ST. PARKING LOTCHANHASSEN, MNFORFORSITE & GRADINGINITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 07/23/19 SHEET: C000 OF 4PROJECT NUMBER: 0020082.00Sheet NumberSheet TitleC000COVERC100EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLANC200CIVIL SITE PLANC300GRADING, STORM SEWER, & EROSION CONTROL PLANCONTEXT MAP (1"=80')NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SSSSSSWATWATWATSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATEDGE OF WATERE D G E O F W A T E REDGE OF WATERFESINV=943.18PONDPONDEX. CBRE=945.71EX. CBRE=945.60EX. FESIE=941.64STOSTO STO STSSSSSSFOWATWATWATSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WAT953952951950948947946945 944943942946947951950949948 9479 4 8 9 4 7 9 4 6 9 4 6 9 4 5 94 4 94 3 94 2943944 946FESINV=943.18SSTSTTSSSTGESANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WA T WA T WA T WA T S AN S AN S AN SAN SANSANSANSANWATWATWATWATWESTST R E E T79THARBORETUM BOULEVARD (MN STATE HIGHWAY 5)REMOVE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE TREE (TYP.)REMOVE TREE (TYP.)B-2B-1B-3\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\MANHOLE NOT LOCATED IN SURVEYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSHEET NUMBER:DATE:PREPARED FOR:HORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0020082.00\DWG\CIVIL\PARKING\0020082EX01.DWG CHANHASSEN, MN07/23/19DMPDMPTDMWEST 79TH ST. PARKING LOTEXISTING CONDITIONS &REMOVALS PLAN8560 KELZER POND DRIVEVICTORIA, MN 55386WEST 79TH ST. PARKING LOTC10007/23/191891907/23/19DANIEL M. PARKSSOLOMON REAL ESTATE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION© 2019 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'20'40'60'1" = 20'..........20'PROJECT NUMBER: 0020082.00PROPERTY LINE\\\\\\CURB & GUTTERSAW CUT PAVEMENTSANSANITARY SEWERWATWATER MAINSTOSTORM SEWERCONCRETEBITUMINOUSTREELIGHT POLETRAFFIC SIGNEXISTINGPROPOSEDSANWATSTOWATHYDRANTWATGASGASGASPUGUNDERGROUND ELECTRICPUGTUGUNDERGROUND TELEPHONETUGPOHOVERHEAD ELECTRICPOHTOHOVERHEAD TELEPHONETOHRETAINING WALLFENCEXSOIL BORING LOCATIONSB-19XEXISTINGREMOVALS\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\REMOVAL LEGEND1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIEDIMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIMITS OF REMOVALS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTSAND FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF EXISTING APPURTENANCES TO REMAIN. CONTRACTORSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING OR REPLACING MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (SUCH ASFENCES, SIGNS, IRRIGATION HEADS, ETC.) THAT MAY BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FORREMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY SITE DEVELOPMENT. ALLPERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.REMOVAL NOTESSSX*XXX 79TH STREET WESTTTGESTXXXAPPLEBEE'SXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXFOCONCRETESIDEWALKFENCE PED. CROSSING AND ISLAND(BY CITY)PONDINGMODULAR BLOCKRETAINING WALL2213.5' 2 5 . 6 2 '11.73'12.57'18.70'15' R3'R20'R15'R10'R150.79'R260.82'R293.02'R118.59'R25'R15'R1 0 'R15'15'5'8.48'AA3'7'PLACE ROCK MULCH BETWEEN BACKOF CURB AND RETAINING WALLFENCEEDGE OF WATERBEGIN ONE-WAYNO TRUCKSSIGNSSODDED BOULEVARD (TYP.)DO NOT ENTERSIGNDO NOT ENTERSIGNSTOP SIGN6'HANDICAP PARKINGAND RAMP SIGNAGE45°(TYP.)W. 79TH ST. TURN LANESTRIPING BY CITYB612 CURB ANDGUTTER (TYP.)RAMP W/ TRUNCATED DOMESSODSHEET NUMBER:DATE:PREPARED FOR:HORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0020082.00\DWG\CIVIL\PARKING\0020082SP01.DWG CHANHASSEN, MN07/23/19DMPDMPTDMWEST 79TH ST. PARKING LOTCIVIL SITE PLAN8560 KELZER POND DRIVEVICTORIA, MN 55386WEST 79TH ST. PARKING LOTC20007/23/191891907/23/19DANIEL M. PARKSSOLOMON REAL ESTATE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION© 2019 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'20'40'60'1" = 20'..........20'PROJECT NUMBER: 0020082.001. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONALSERVICES.2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THEENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY.3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS.4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERSAND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OFTHESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS.8. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THERECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURINGCONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TOADJACENT PROPERTIES.10. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPAREDBY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS.11. PARKING LOT STRIPING TO BE TWO COATS OF 4" WHITE PAINT WITH EPOXY AND SILICA SAND.GENERAL SITE NOTESPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSTRANSFORMERSITE LIGHTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDFENCEXXNORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTRAFFIC SIGNPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTCONCRETE SIDEWALK (4" CONC. OVER 4" CLASS V)TIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGEND5T PARKING LOT CROSS-SECTION A-AN.T.S.LAST REVISED:07/17/1918.7'13.5'5'3' 7'EX. SLOPERETAINING WALLDRIVE LANEPARKING STALLSEX. CURBAND STREETFENCESI19PAVEMENT SECTIONS SHOWN ARE FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTIONS.LAST REVISED:08/15/17BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (STANDARD DUTY)1.5" MnDOT TYPE 2360 SPWEA240B WEARING COURSE2" MnDOT TYPE 2360 SPNWB230B BASE COURSE6" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5APPROVED SUBGRADEMNDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT6"MAX.AANOTES:1. PROVIDE A RELATIVELY FLAT MINIMUM 4'x4' LANDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, 2% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE BOTH DIRECTIONS.2. CURB RAMP AREA TO BE CONCRETE AND MEET LATEST ADA REQUIREMENTS. RAMP CROSS SLOPE 2% MAXIMUM. BACK-TO-BACK PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 48'' LANDING BETWEEN, OR PROVIDE AT-GRADE CROSSING.3. SIDE FLARES TO BE CONCRETE AND IMPLEMENTED WHERE ADJACENT TO PAVED AREAS. FLARED SLOPE TO BE 10% MAXIMUM. EXISTING CURB RAMP ALTERATIONS, WITH NO LANDING, SHALL BE 8.33% MAXIMUM. PROVIDE 10% MAXIMUM SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.4. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE MAY NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH.5. ADA REQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE(TRUNCATED DOMES) SHALL BE 2' MIN. IN DIRECTION OF LANDING AT CURB AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE LANDING. AREA SHALL BE CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE WITH A PREFABRICATED CAST IRON TRUNCATED DOME INSERT MEETING THE ADA DOME SIZE AND SPACING REQUIREMENTS.ALAST REVISED:08/15/17PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPSI09AA332233FACE OFCURBBACK OFCURBFACE OFCURB15158"5' MIN.4' MIN. ORPER PLAN5' MIN.5'-4"MIN.2'8"5' MIN.5' MIN.4' MIN. ORPER PLAN5'-4"MIN.2'CURB FACEOR GUTTER5% APPROACHSLOPE MAXSEE NOTE #41/2" PREFORMEDJOINT FILLER MATERIALRAMP5'-4" MIN.LANDING4' MIN.RAMP 8.33%MAX. SLOPECONCRETE WALKDET. WARN.SURFACEROUND ALL SLOPEDINTERSECTIONSSIDE FLARE 10%MAX. SLOPESIDE FLARE5' MIN.RAMP4' MIN.SIDE FLARE5' MIN.ELEVATION OF RAMPSECTION A-APLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMPPLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMPHANDICAP SYMBOLLAST REVISED:08/15/17HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPINGSI15HANDICAP SIGNNOPARKINGNOTE:BOTTOM OF SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED60"-66" FROM PARKING GRADE, SEESIGN POST INSTALLATION DETAILHANDICAP PARKINGNOTE:STRIPING TO MATCHPARKING, UNLESSPER LOCAL CODENOTE:SEE PLAN FOR PARKING LAYOUTNOPARKINGPARKINGVEHICLE IDREQUIREDUP TO $200 FINEFOR VIOLATIONVANACCESSIBLENOPARKING ACCESS AISLEHANDICAP PARKING SPACE WITHPAINTED INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OFACCESSIBILITY WITH CONTRASTINGSQUARE BACKGROUND, CENTEREDTOWARD DRIVE AISLE.HANDICAP PARKINGSIGNS, 12"X18", OR PERLOCAL CODEHANDICAP SIGNCENTERED AT HEAD OFSPACE ON CENTER STRIPEHANDICAP PARKING ACCESSAISLE WITH PAINTED 12"HIGH LETTERING OF "NOPARKING" CENTEREDTOWARD DRIVE AISLEPER CITYCODEHANDICAP VANACCESSIBLE PARKINGSIGN, 12"X16", OR PERLOCAL CODE, ASAPPLICABLEFACE OF CURBSIDEWALKHANDICAP SIGNCENTERED AT HEAD OFSPACE, 2' MIN. AND 8'MAX. FROM FACE OFCURB2"-0"2"-0"10" DIAMETER CENTERSYMBOL IN PARKING STALL,ALL LINES TO BE 5" WIDE2"-0"NOPARKING4" WIDE PAINTED STRIPINGAT 45 DEGREES AND AT 2'O.C. AT ACCESS AISLE8'MIN.8'MIN.8'MIN.5°67.5° FOWATWATWATWAT953952951950948947946945944943942 946947951950949948 9479 4 8 9 4 7 9 4 6 9 4 6 9 4 5 94 494394 2943944 946SSSSSWATWATWATSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WAT EX. CBRE=945.71EX. CBRE=945.60EX. FESIE=941.64STOSTO STO STXXXAPPLEBEE'SX X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X79TH STREET WESTSSTSTTSSSTGESANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WA T WA T WA T WA T S AN S AN S AN S AN SANSANSANSANWATWATWATWAT945.40945.90946.15946.20946.26946.50946.00947.20946.76947.01946.13947.75947.70947.40948.50948.10947.69948.94946.98945.99945.24946.59942.70947.00946.25942.04942.04BBSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF 947.00950946946947947947948949951940 9 4 0 945 938 9 3 8 939 9 3 9 941 941 942 942942 943 944 946947947 947.04946.83946.73946.40945.99945.96946.32945.75946.49945.71945.75944.40946.21944.69SEED & MULCH DISTURBED AREASILT FENCE (TYP.)SODDED BOULEVARD (TYP.)INLET PROTECTIONCB 27" ∅RE=945.40IE=941.77R-3067 CASTINGW/ 3' SUMPFESIE=941.5054 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50%ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCECITY POND RM-P4.6NWL=941.5100-YR HWL=947.00100-YR HWL=949.48 (WATERSHED)PROPOSED PONDPOND BOTTOM=938.00NWL=941.50SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFMNDOT SEED MIX33-262 ON SLOPEMNDOT SEED MIX33-261 IN WET AREASEED POND, SLOPES, &EMBANKMENT W/WOOD-FIBER BLANKETSEED & MULCH DISTURBED AREASSOUTH OF RETAINING WALLSEE OVERFLOWOUTLET PLAN DETAIL3:1 (TYP.)RESPONSIBLE PARTYJAY SCOTTDESCRIPTIONSTART DATESTART OF WORK09/05/19INSTALL EROSION CONTROL09/05/19START GRADING & RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION09/09/19PLACE SEED, MULCH, & FIBER BLANKET09/23/19INSTALL STORM SEWER, RIP RAP, & POND OVERFLOW09/30/19BEGIN CURBING, SIDEWALK, & GRAVEL FOR PARKING LOT 10/07/19PAVE PARKING LOT10/21/19INSTALL SOD & FENCING10/28/19END OF WORK11/30/19SHEET NUMBER:DATE:PREPARED FOR:HORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0020082.00\DWG\CIVIL\PARKING\0020082GD01.DWG CHANHASSEN, MN07/23/19DMPDMPTDMWEST 79TH ST. PARKING LOTGRADING, STORM SEWER, &EROSION CONTROL PLAN8560 KELZER POND DRIVEVICTORIA, MN 55386WEST 79TH ST. PARKING LOTC30007/23/191891907/23/19DANIEL M. PARKSSOLOMON REAL ESTATE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION© 2019 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'20'40'60'1" = 20'..........20'PROJECT NUMBER: 0020082.00PROPERTY LINE982980POND NORMAL WATER LEVELTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSB-19SOIL BORING LOCATIONSTOSTORM SEWERWATER MAINSANITARY SEWEREXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUR982980WATSANSPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONSB-19RETAINING WALLCURB AND GUTTERFLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP)GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THEENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.2. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCHEXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.3. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATEREDUNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH ASBARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERENECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROLDEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS.5. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHUNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES.7. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE.8. SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITE GRADING AND UTILITYCONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLETO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.11. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANTDISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE.PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY-LOADED TANDEM-AXLEDUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTIONOF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RE-COMPACTED AS SPECIFIEDHEREIN.13. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED INACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.14. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED INACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2.15. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FORTHE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICALENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITHTHE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.GRADING NOTES0.00%900.00900.00TW=XXX.XXBW=XXX.XXE.O.F.POND CROSS-SECTION B-BN.T.S.LAST REVISED:07/17/193:13:1NWL = 941.5'NWL = 941.5'5'EXISTING CITY PONDPROPOSED PONDPOND BOTTOM = 938.00BERM TOP = 942.00OVERFLOW=941.505'SILT FENCEROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETINLET PROTECTIONSFSCHEDULE & RESPONSIBLE PARTY1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AREBASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BERELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THEOWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES.2. ALL STORM SEWER MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORMSEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK ORVERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTORUNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER.4. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THECONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BYTHE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITYUNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICETO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.6. STORM SEWER PIPE:A. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGERUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PER ASTM C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS.B. ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS AND STRUCTURE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA PLUMBINGCODE, PART 707.3. STORM SEWER LOCATED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED PER MINNESOTAPLUMBING CODE, PART 712.7. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS-BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION.THE AS-BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER ORENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST-CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED.GENERAL STORM SEWER NOTESPOND OVERFLOW OUTLET PLAN DETAILN.T.S.LAST REVISED:07/19/19941.55.0'5.0'942942CLASS 3 RIP RAPBERMST05RIPRAP AT OUTLETS810108121418201612L(Ft.)TABLE OF QUANTITIES24"DepthDepth18"RiprapRiprapApron(Cu. Yd.)(Cu. Yd.)(Cu. Yd.)(Cu. Yd.)(Cu. Yd.)(Cu. Yd.)RiprapDepth12"(In.)PipeRoundDia.2.32.11.51.21.00.70.50.40.316.413.212.39.48.56.45.92.21.71.61.10.90.80.60.40.30.312.39.99.27.16.44.84.41.51.21.10.80.60.50.40.30.20.212.510.68.26.66.24.74.33.23.0RIPRAP AT OUTLETSCLASS IVCLASS IICLASS III2.929.624.921.122.218.715.814.848423630272421181512PLANSECTION B-BRIPRAP1'2'2'SECTION A-AGRANULAR FILTERGEOTEXTILE FABRICMNDOT 373352GRANULAR CUSHION4GRANULARCUSHIONGEOTEXTILE FABRICMNDOT 373321'1RIPRAPDIA. E 2'32' 2'AA1441BBLNOTES:1. FOR PIPES GREATER OR EQUAL TO 30", USE 1.5'.2. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL COVER THE BOTTOM AND SIDES OF THE AREA EXCAVATED FOR THE RIPRAP, GRANULAR FILTER MATERIALS.3. DIMENSION "E" EQUALS INSIDE WIDTH OF APRON.4. GRANULAR FILTER, MNDOT 3601, MAY BE USED AS A CUSHION LAYER. PLACE FILTER PER MNDOT 2511.5. GRANULAR FILTER OR RIPRAP, MNDOT 3601, TO EXTEND UNDER ENTIRE OPEN PORTION OF PIPE APRON. DEPTH OF MATERIAL UNDER APRON SHALL MATCH RIPRAP DEPTH. WHEN USING RIPRAP INCREASE RIPRAP QUANTITY ACCORDINGLY AND PLACE A 3" LAYER OF 1.5" CRUSHED ROCK UNDER THE APRON TO AID IN GRADING FOR APRON PLACEMENT.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE RIPRAP, PULVERIZED TOPSOIL, SEED AND WOODFIBER BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER PIPE IS INSTALLED. EXTEND AREA TO MATCH UNDISTURBED SOIL.GranularFilterUnderApronGranularFilterUnderApronGranularFilterUnder4d50 = 6"d50 = 9"d50 = 12"LAST REVISED:08/10/171941941940940 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 3, 2019 Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Randall, John Tietz, Michael McGonagill, and Laura Skistad MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad and Doug Reeder STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and George Bender, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Dan Zwiers Elko Michael Baier Box 340, Chanhassen Larry & Susan Nowlin 3713 South Cedar Drive PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH A VARIANCE FOR HARD COVER FOR EXPANSION OF A RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 590 WEST 79TH STREET. Generous: Thank you Chairman and commissioners. As you stated Planning Case 2019-08 is a site plan review with a variance. They are proposing to slightly expand an existing restaurant site in the community. Normally we would have done this administratively but they’ve gone over 10 percent of the allocated square footage and so it has to come through the public hearing process. The applicant is Chanhassen Butcher LLC and the public hearing is tonight, September 3rd and it goes to City Council on September 9th so it’s a quick turn around. The property is located at 590 West 79th Street. It’s just to the east of the Walgreen’s and south of the Tires Plus. Across the street is city owned property and we’ll discuss that a little later as long, as well as some stormwater facilities. Again this is a site plan review for expansion of a restaurant to add two exterior seasonal patios. One with a partial roof cover and there’s a variance for hard cover. The property is guided for commercial uses in the Comprehensive Plan. It’s zoned Highway and Business Services District and restaurants are permitted use in the district. The site plan. I’ve highlighted the two areas of the patio. This is the south patio. This is going to be their adults only area and this would be open to anyone that comes to the restaurant. They’re proposing that this area is be fenced in also. They’re making these of composite wood materials so low maintenance requirements. Long life on it. They will be having a roof over 70 percent of the southern patio area and that’s where additional hard cover is brought into the equation. As part of our review the Fire Marshal required that they provided egress, sidewalk from the patio to the Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 2 street system and then additionally staff had recommended that they provide this access from West 79th Street into their building. Currently there is an access point on the end over here. There’s a small stairway. The City Engineer felt it would be better to move that farther to the east to accommodate anyone using that new crosswalk that will be developed on the corner. Again this is a view of the, a schematic of the building. Here’s the new metal roof. It will be standing seam black in color. They’ll have wood columns. They’re going to wrap those in cedar and then they’ll have the composite decking. The surfaces allow water to percolate through them so for the uncovered patio there’s no additional pervious surface and for the southern patio the total size is 900 square feet, 670 square feet of that is in their, underneath the cover so it’s counted in the hard cover. I should point out that as part of the variance request 56 percent of the hard cover is due to the pedestrian circulation that the City is requiring them to install on the site. There will be minimal grading for the sidewalk and this is an old plan. They don’t show the connection but they’ll be some grading to bring the sidewalk to the west to connect in here. The one condition that we have regarding the sidewalk is that we make it ADA compliant and so that would mean that the steps would have to be removed and they’d have to revise the grading to lengthen out that slope. I should note that the City is working with the property owner concurrently or in parallel for a public parking lot on the south side of West 79th Street. This will be a one way operation so they’ll enter from the west side and exit out on the east side. After, this is the entrance to the Crosswoods Plaza development. There will be a sidewalk installed as well as a little island for pedestrians in the middle of West 79th Street. In reviewing the site plan, oh I should probably go back and point out. If you look at all these properties have cross access and cross parking agreements so once you get in here you can actually drive internally without going out onto West 79th Street and go over to the pharmacy. After 5:00 the restaurant has right to use parking within the Walgreen’s site and historically it’s been the ones right on the periphery but under the easement agreement it could be anything in here. There is a small sidewalk section in here. This is the end of the sidewalk that’s being removed as part of this project and this is the location of the public parking lot that will be available for all the properties and development within the Crosswoods Plaza development. Finally staff is recommending approval of the expansion of the 900 square foot patio on the south side of the building. The 677 square foot patio on the west side of the building and to permit an additional 946 square feet of hard surface which will bring it up to 73.1 percent hard cover. Currently they have a variance to allow 70 percent. Had this property been located north of the railroad tracks there would be no variance requirements in this. This is an extension of our downtown area and so at the time it was zoned Business Highway they were looking for low profile buildings and so they didn’t feel that they would cover that much. However when you bring in a restaurant the parking standard are increased so high that they tend to eat up all the hard cover with that. With that, and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. With that I’d be happy to answer any questions. Weick: Thanks Bob. Appreciate it. Just go ahead and open it up to the commission to go ahead and kind of take turns and ask questions. If you want to start Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: I will. Thanks Steve. Regarding the deck is, it’s specified as decking material but it’s called a patio so is that, it’s pervious? Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 3 Generous: It’s pervious yeah. Tietz: It’s pervious. Generous: So the slots between the boards and so. Tietz: So that will drain and it will go under the ground. Generous: Under the ground and the water. Tietz: Okay. And on the parking, a couple questions on parking. The Walgreen’s on that side, if you count just the sites that are highlighted in your red. In red in your diagram Bob, there are 87 parking so I’m not, one I’m not sure how they got to current of a 124 and proposed is 136. Now does that assumes that it’s cross access parking agreement allows for that. Generous: That’s correct. Tietz: In the future when this takes off and we have a lot of people coming there the tire stores stays open til 7:00. The drug store stays open til 10:00. How do you resolve conflicts of parking in the future if there are more stalls required of the facility? And I’m also concerned, is the City building the parking lot across the street or are they building it on city property? Aanenson: They are building it on city property. Tietz: They are? Aanenson: They are, correct. And so that’s also going through the watershed district for stormwater and all that too so correct. Tietz: Okay, well just go back to the parking numbers. I just, it’s kind of confusing. The numbers don’t seem to work out. And I don’t know what the occupancy of the building is because those sheets were not included in the documentation. Generous: They based it on the City’s requirement of 1 per 64 in the building square footage and that includes their cooler and cooking area. The numbers they had, on site there were 87 spots on the specific property. Tietz: In that red. Generous: Yeah in the red area which is their lot. And then they counted 24 of the spaces over, off on the periphery of the Walgreen’s site. I don’t know if you’ve ever been there at 7:00 or Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 4 8:00 at night but I don’t, I’ve never seen any conflict there. But if it became an issue it’s something that we would address with the property owner. Tietz: Well it’s just you know it’s just those cross access agreements sometimes can get kind of muddy and if there’s ever a conflict, it doesn’t appear that there would be but you know there’s not too many people buying tires and having tires put on at 7:00 at night but happy hour starts at 5:00 I think doesn’t it so there’s, it’s just a concern with the cross access and if there ever is a conflict how do we, or is it spelled out in that document? We didn’t have access to that document. Aanenson: In the cross access agreement? Tietz: Yeah. Aanenson: Yes it’s spelled out. I mean between the individual parties. Tietz: For resolution of problems. McGonagill: Yeah same question I had frankly. Aanenson: Well it’s between the individual property owners so if they would have to resolve that which Walgreen’s would assert their rights too. What the hours are and how many they’re using, right. Tietz: Okay. McGonagill: Bob, thanks Commissioner Tietz because that was the very first same question. If you can go with me Bob to, first off I want to start with the parking lot across the street because I need to understand something on the 78th, the parking lot across the street that’s being built. Okay, go to the diagram. Is there, when I look at that I can see where the fence is. They’re putting the fence in along there right? Is that a sidewalk in there too? Generous: No. McGonagill: Okay, alright. So this comes to my question. If you now can go to the site plan of the building, that one. My concern is this, I understand the fire department and they’re dumping everybody out on the street. Right they’re dumping everybody out, right there. Generous: Onto the sidewalk. McGonagill: Onto that sidewalk. People are going to go across the street right there. What’s going to prevent them from just walking off and then walking down the fence line? I mean I realize that’s not what they’re supposed to do but you built this crosswalk and everything over Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 5 here on the left to try to put traffic flow there so people would not do that. But people line of sight, I mean furthest distance between two points is a straight line and I’m really I think I know exactly what’s going to happen. People are going to walk down the street. Either going to go, and unfortunately they’re hitting the parking lot across the street right in the middle so they’ll go this way. They’re going to go to the right or the left and work their way around that fence. Aanenson: Yep a lot of time was spent looking at that issue with the applicants. The City did, the City Engineer did work with SRF to give us a recommendation for the best crossing and we did not want them to cross mid block nor did we want them to cross at the intersection because people are committed so if they cross mid block they’re still not going to be able to get in. There’s a fence there which is the reason why we put the fence there is to deter that so the fire department, and it isn’t a building code issue. It’s a fire department issue to get people safely out of the building to a surface. Again they would go back, can you go back to the parking lot. Go back to the intersection where you’ve got a. McGonagill: Yeah they’re going to come out basically where that car is. Generous: It will be right here. McGonagill: Right in there. Aanenson: Correct. Have to go left or right because you can’t talk them in the box. Either go a controlled intersection so part of everything that we discussed with this is, you know with the tax increment district that’s, that we put in place with the Venue project is the improvement of Market Boulevard so what we looked at that is kind of a short range this project is and as we make those improvements on Market Boulevard this intersection would also be re-examined too but there is a mid point crossing. Again if you could go back to the parking lot design. There is a mid point crossing that shows a, there would be a base sidewalk similar to what’s at Galpin and 5. McGonagill: Well I get when I first saw the design of this I was fine. Okay they’re going to come off here. They go straight across. Straight line. They’ll go into the restaurant. Makes all the sense in the world. But putting the sidewalk right in the middle you’ve negated that whole approach of trying to force people to go in a certain direction. Do you follow what I’m saying? Aanenson: Right but he other, we spent a lot of time discussing that too so if you’re going up there is no access going up the driveway and you’re coming into the dumpster and some fire hydrant equipment so currently right now the entrance is on the other side of the building. McGonagill: Right it’s over on the left. You come around and you have to go around that. Aanenson: Correct. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 6 McGonagill: I understand that but the, with the fence and the parking that will make people do that. I’m just saying when they come out of the restaurant or they come out of the play area they’re going to be on that sidewalk and they’re going to head south and they’ll dump onto the street. I mean that’s. Aanenson: That’s a smaller percentage of the people that are going to go there too. Those 25 yeah. Right. McGonagill: It only takes one to get hit so that’s my point. Kids coming out of there running, you know they’re going to go straight. And so then they’ll go down the street. So I understand what you’re trying to go and that was one of my concerns. I want to understand that’s what you did or how it was designed so I understand the point. And I’m, it was kind of, I was surprised to see that but I understand what the fire department did. Now I understand why it was there to start with so makes sense. On the site, can you go back to the site plan again? That one. One of the things that when I was reading the write up I was curious why you, why this was done. Up in the upper left corner, and we talked about, you know we talk about coverage. We talk about hard cover and we talk about trying to get water into the ground to control it you know and to void that which makes sense and even though we’re over the percentage, why did you replace the, the way I read it. Maybe I read it wrong. Why did you replace the rain garden with a tree? To me rain gardens work great. I mean this rain garden in the upper left corner. That’s the one I’m concentrating on because this water’s dumping off of this shed, that would be an ideal to me a place for a rain garden. I have one in my yard and it does a great job of controlling my wet area but when…knows this a lot better than I do that if rain garden’s work, why was that one, why did you take it out? Bender: I believe it was felt that the tree in and of itself would, the root system would be absorbing water. There were no details provided on the rain garden from the applicant at all and all it said was potential rain garden and it wasn’t felt that it was completely necessary. McGonagill: I understand, okay. Obviously if they had, with a concern of hard cover to me one of the best solutions of handling hard cover is rain gardens and retention areas which is really what a rain garden is. And given, if I go back, go back to the photograph Bob if you would please. Generous: Of the aerial? McGonagill: Of the aerial yeah. When I look at that area and going to me if you’re going to put one it’d be a great spot for it. It’d be a great place to hold the water because the drainage kind of, if I remember right runs this way doesn’t it? And you could at least keep it on the site. Let it slow down and then move it’s way. Bender: Hit a tile and go straight to the storm sewer. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 7 McGonagill: Yeah and move it’s time. You know take it’s time to not overflow, particularly since you have all this parking lot up to the north. That was my reaction to the question. That’s really what I was wondering. Because it really was about that. I would like to see something in there to kind of control it and I was also thinking that’s, you know if you had it is that a way you could keep people from going across the street but you can’t the way it’s designed. You have to go to the sidewalk so. Bender: The applicant still can, you know when they come with their final plans and what not still include one. That will be up to them. McGonagill: Great. I think it’d be a great spot for it and be the right environmental thing to do. Weick: Question. Will the, that parking lot be signed in any way? That’s across the street. Aanenson: I don’t believe so. Weick: In other words like. Generous: One way. Weick: They won’t say parking for. Aanenson: No. Weick: Because technically that parking is for anybody. Aanenson: Correct. Weick: So to assume that everybody that parks there is going to be going to the, the Butcher restaurant isn’t, that’s not. They could be going to BW3. They could be going to Walgreen’s. They could be going anywhere. Aanenson: That’s correct. Weick: Okay. Which then and my point to say that is then that sort of central walkway you know might make more sense because it is servicing then the entire. McGonagill: Central, which one Chairman? Weick: The way they have it now. McGonagill: Oh yeah. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 8 Weick: Because not everybody’s going to be going there. McGonagill: No and that’s a perfect place to put it. I mean that was a good design. It solved the problem for parking. It was across the street and it forced everyone, my point was it forced everyone to go through at least the most controlled access point you could. They put a median in there for protection so they had done a lot to protect the residents and I think that’s great. I agree with you. It’s just when they come out of the restaurant and swing around go south they’re going to head to the parking lot and they’re not going to go around. They’re going to go straight. Weick: Okay. McGonagill: It kind of, to there’s a particular restaurant close to the lake in Excelsior that has this situation and people go across the street all the time in every direction. That’s, I don’t want to recreate that issue. Weick: Sure, yeah. Tietz: We did have some conversation at one of the last meetings too about, hopefully that could be more of employee parking. Is that correct or is that not correct? Aanenson: It’s intended how they want to use it, yeah. Tietz: Yeah. Aanenson: Again that was the purpose of the fence. You can get over there but there’s no sidewalk on that side so you’re really encouraging someone if you want to make the crossing to try to jump a fence or walk in the street that you would stay on the sidewalk. Because there’s a fence so that was the intent of that. Weick: Questions? None, okay. Thank you. At this time I’d like to have the applicant come forward. If they would like and either answer any of the concerns you’ve heard so far or just give us a general overview of the project that’d be great. Good evening. Blaine Eggen: Good evening. So my name is Blaine Eggen. This is Tony. We’re excited to be coming to Chanhassen if we can get this thing done. The name of the restaurant would be Tequila Butcher. It’s going to be a, I don’t know if any of you have been to Whiskey Inferno in Savage but it’s a lot of smoked meats but this one, Tony likes to do, Tony’s the main orchestrator behind all this. So we’re continuing to smoke meats but we’re adding a Mexican flare to it. Tony started in Eagan. If anybody’s been to Folsted House. The Grandson’s Eatery and Burgers and Bottles is in Eagan on Lone Oak Road. That’s where he got his start and then went to Farmington with Bourbon Butcher and then Whiskey Inferno was our last one that we just did. Completed last year. We’ve had a lot of good success there and we’re excited to bring this to Chanhassen, this concept. In this particular setting we chose to do the split patios to try and give Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 9 a family oriented one on the side where we’ve got the fenced in area. We were trying to incorporate like a Bocce Ball type of situation but with the terrain and the area that we’re left with it didn’t work out so we kind of just created this fenced in area for families to, if their kids want to play in the grass and do some sorts of activities there, that they would have that where it’s safe for them to do that. The back patio with the covered feature is a key thing for us. We have it in Farmington and we have it in Savage. It’s one of our main themes that we have where you’ve got a fireplace to sit at back there and it’s just a, that area is going to be more of a quiet adult area for people to mingle and have cocktails and stuff. The inside project if you guys care, it will be different from all the other places but, I don’t know do you want to add anything to the inside? Tony: Hi guys, good evening. We’re, I guess what Blaine’s trying to say is we’re beyond excited to be in Chanhassen. We want to bring something unique to the community that’s not already here. We always spend a lot of time looking at what’s competition doing and we try to not head on compete with what’s going on but create something completely unique to the community so that’s what he’s saying with the two patios. One that’s family friendly and one for much needed night out with friends and date night where you don’t bring the kids and there’s not kids throwing crayons on the floor so very cocktail focused and just something very unique to Chanhassen so. Blaine Eggen: And then as far as the working with planning, we had come to the table with, with eliminating 4 parking stalls so that we wouldn’t have to do the variance and they suggested obviously we didn’t want to do that but we thought that would be a solution because we need parking is also a big key to this. And they suggested no, that we go for the variance and keep the parking which is great with us. So that’s where that all came about. Other than that if you guys have any questions. Weick: Great, thank you very much and please don’t misinterpret us kind of getting into the weeds on some of these things as not being excited about you guys coming to town because I’ve been on this commission for a few years and we consistently hear that people want solutions like this you know for dining and for relaxing and having a drink or whatever it is. So certainly it’s a cool, I think it’s a great thing for Chanhassen, speaking on behalf of myself only but I don’t have any specific questions about the site but certainly if anybody does of the applicant. No? Okay, well thank you. Thanks for coming. Blaine Eggen: Thank you. Weick: At this time I would open it to, I don’t gavel that. I gavel it closed. I’ll open up the public hearing portion of this. Anyone wishing to come forward and voice an opinion on this project or what you’ve heard so far tonight please do so. And seeing nobody come forward I will close the public hearing portion and open this item up for commissioner discussion and/or motion. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 10 Tietz: Probably not too much to say. I think it’s a great idea and a great solution for Chan. I think it’s going to be good. I’m just always concerned about parking and I’m sorry but I am concerned about parking and with the system that you have there with the cross, cross access agreements for parking it just looks like, I don’t know what, how big is Houlihan’s across the way? Sometimes that parking lot, I mea it’s over into Total Wine. It’s down by Bookoo. It’s all over and it’s just my caution that hopefully we don’t run into some issues at certain times of the evening but I think it’s great. I look forward to dining there so thanks. McGonagill: Yeah I’ll reiterate what the commissioner said. It’s real excited about having it there and I think it will be a great addition. Something that we’ve needed for a long time. My concern goes, and it’s not the restaurant. It’s the parking just like you’ve talked. How you access it and what it is. The cross agreements. They’re going to have to work that out. I do, I can’t, you know my issue is with the sidewalk and having access in and where it’s going to egress. I’d like to see some additional thought put into that some way. You know we have great engineering staff and we have an applicant that wants to work with us to try to prevent people from going across the street and walking down the street. That happens at another restaurant all the time and people coming around those corners and people having a great time and you’re out for a good time and you’re just walking. You don’t think about those things. So traffic flow or pedestrian flow is a concern but it doesn’t take away from the value of the restaurant. I want to make that clear. Weick: Sure. Yeah. McGonagill: And the hard cover I think they can, there’s ways to solve that that I’ve already talked about so they can, but I would ask them to really consider that. But that’s really where all my comments start and stop is the, is accessing the, I think we’ve done a great job with that parking lot across the street trying to prevent people from going across the street except in one spot. I want to see that discipline maintained someway. Weick: Yeah. Because ultimately the parking affects the business right. I mean if there aren’t enough spots for people to park then that ends up hurting the business so he’s not. McGonagill: We want that. Weick: Right yeah so we want. McGonagill: We absolutely want that. Weick: People to succeed and. McGonagill: Yeah I think this will be a very busy place so it’s, I don’t know what the answer is but I’m not the engineer. I just try to follow a want to be engineers. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 11 Weick: There you go. And no issues with the actual variance which is the hard cover variance. I mean we don’t. McGonagill: Not for myself. Weick: Okay. Tietz: Are you ready for a motion? Weick: I love it. Tietz: I’ll make a motion. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the restaurant expansion to include two exterior patios of 900 and 677 square feet, for the variance to permit the addition of 946 square feet of hard cover to permit 73 percent hard cover subject to the conditions of the staff report and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Weick: We have a valid motion from Commissioner Tietz. Do we have a second? McGonagill: I’ll second it. Weick: We have a second from Commissioner McGonagill. Any last comments before we vote? Tietz moved, McGonagill seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Site Plan #2019-08 to permit the construction of two exterior patios with a variance to permit an additional 946 square feet of hardcover for a total of 73 percent hardcover, plans prepared by CNH Architects dated 8/22/19, and Westwood dated 8/20/19, subject to the following conditions and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Building 1. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 2. Building plans must include a code analysis that contains the following information: Key plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext. walls, Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. 3. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. Engineering Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 3, 2019 12 1. All newly proposed pedestrian access routes shall be ADA compliant. 2. An Encroachment Agreement Application shall be filed for any structures places in public drainage and utility easements. 3. Grading plans shall be updated to include erosion control Best Management Practices upon submittal of building permits. 4. Site plan shall be updated upon submittal of building permits to include: a. Legend b. Engineering scale c. Vicinity map d. Existing utilities (and services) e. Detail plates f. Call 811 notes Fire 1. Remodel of interior will require separate fire sprinkler, fire alarm, and kitchen hood suppression system permits. 2. Sprinklers will possibly be required under exterior covered patio ceiling. Planning 1. The applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The applicant shall install an additional over-story tree to the southeast of the south deck. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Owner Name Percent of Ownership Rheata C. Donatell 97% Rodrigo LopezAndrade 3% CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Approval of OnSale Intoxicating Liquor License with Sunday Sales for Chanhassen Butcher, LLC dba Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: LIQ TEQUILA BUTCHER PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the request for an onsale intoxicating liquor license with Sunday sales from Chanhassen Butcher, LLC, dba Tequila Butcher located at 590 West 79th Street.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY This office has received a request for an onsale intoxicating liquor license with Sunday sales from Chanhassen Butcher, LLC, dba Tequila Butcher, located at 590 West 78th Street (former Applebee's site). BACKGROUND The property is zoned Highway and Business Services (BH) District and specialty sales, including liquor sales, is a permitted use in this district. Liquor sales are also allowed in Planned Unit DevelopmentCommerical (PUD), Business Neighborhood (BN), Central Business District (CBD), Community Commercial (CC), and General Business (BG) zoning districts. The property owner, Chanhassen West 79th Street, LLC, is leasing the building to the applicant and a copy of the Lease Agreement has been submitted to this office. The size of the proposed restaurant and bar is 5,792 square feet, with an additional 900 square feet for Patio A and 677 square feet for Patio B. The total size of the bar, restaurant, and two patios equals 7369 square feet. Projected guest seating is 165 seats in the restaurant interior and 132 seats in the seasonal patio. The applicant anticipates opening the liquor store in early November, 2019. Chanhassen Butcher, LLC is a limited liability corporation with one named manager, Rheata C. Donatell. Additionally, Rodrigo LopezAndrade is listed on the application as a partial owner. The following table reflects the ownership breakdown as shown on the application: The Carver County Sheriff’s Office has been requested to complete a background investigation on the owners listed in Owner Name Percent of OwnershipRheata C. Donatell 97%Rodrigo LopezAndrade 3%CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 9, 2019SubjectApproval of OnSale Intoxicating Liquor License with Sunday Sales for Chanhassen Butcher,LLC dba Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th StreetSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.1.Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: LIQ TEQUILA BUTCHERPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the request for an onsale intoxicating liquor license with Sunday sales from ChanhassenButcher, LLC, dba Tequila Butcher located at 590 West 79th Street.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThis office has received a request for an onsale intoxicating liquor license with Sunday sales from ChanhassenButcher, LLC, dba Tequila Butcher, located at 590 West 78th Street (former Applebee's site). BACKGROUNDThe property is zoned Highway and Business Services (BH) District and specialty sales, including liquor sales, is apermitted use in this district. Liquor sales are also allowed in Planned Unit DevelopmentCommerical (PUD), BusinessNeighborhood (BN), Central Business District (CBD), Community Commercial (CC), and General Business (BG)zoning districts. The property owner, Chanhassen West 79th Street, LLC, is leasing the building to the applicant and a copy of theLease Agreement has been submitted to this office. The size of the proposed restaurant and bar is 5,792 square feet,with an additional 900 square feet for Patio A and 677 square feet for Patio B. The total size of the bar, restaurant,and two patios equals 7369 square feet. Projected guest seating is 165 seats in the restaurant interior and 132 seats inthe seasonal patio. The applicant anticipates opening the liquor store in early November, 2019.Chanhassen Butcher, LLC is a limited liability corporation with one named manager, Rheata C. Donatell. Additionally,Rodrigo LopezAndrade is listed on the application as a partial owner. The following table reflects the ownershipbreakdown as shown on the application: The Carver County Sheriff’s Office has been requested to complete a background investigation on the owners listed in the table above. The investigation includes criminal history checks, driving records, and outstanding warrants. No negative comments were found on either of these individuals. Rheata C. Donatell will also be the operating manager of the restaurant. The owners also own and operate three other restaurants in Minnesota with onsale intoxicating liquor licenses, all located within the metro area: Bourbon Butcher, 20700 Chippendale Avenue, Farmington, MN (Lone Oak Store, LLC) Burgers and Bottles, 1278 Lone Oak Road, Eagan, MN (Lone Oak Store, LLC) Whiskey Inferno, 14425 Highway 13, Savage, MN (Inferno Savage, LLC) A public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site. As of the writing of this staff report, no comments have been received. A review of Carver County tax records show that all tax payments on the property are paid to date. Chanhassen utility bill records show that all utility payments are paid to date. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve of the onsale intoxicating liquor license with Sunday sales as requested by Chanhassen Butcher, LLC, dba Tequila Butcher located at 590 West 79th Street. Approval of the license would be contingent upon receipt of the required annual fee of $9,809.00 (to be prorated to number of months licensed is issued), receipt of certificate of insurance for liquor liability, and final approval by the Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Department. ATTACHMENTS: Property Report Card Floor Plan Patio Plan Property Card Taxpayer Information Property Address Parcel Information Building Information Miscellaneous Information Assessor Information Ta xp ayer N ameCHANHASSEN WEST 79TH STREET LLC Mailin g Address 8560 KELZER POND DR VICTORIA, MN 55386- Parcel ID Number 25249 0040 Address 590 79TH ST W City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 Uses Comme rcial GIS Acre sDeeded AcresPlatLotBlock 1.2 3 CROSSRO AD S PLAZA 3RD ADD ITIO N004001Tax Description Bu ilding Style Year Built Garag e Ab ove G radeFinished Sq Ft Be drooms Scho ol District Watershed District Homestead Green Acre s Ag Preserve0112WS 0 64 RIL EY PURG BLU FF N N N Estimated Market Value Land Bu ilding To tal 2018 Value s(Paya ble 2019 )2019 Value s(Paya ble 2020 )Last Sale Date of Sale Sa le Va lue $843,400 .00 $593,500 .00 $1,436,900.00 $885,600 .00 $639,000 .00 $1,524,600.00 9/2 8/2 018 $2,000,000.00 The data provided herewith is for reference purposes only. This data is not suitable for legal, engineering, surveying or other similar purposes. Carver County does not guarantee the accuracy of theinformation contained herein. This data is furnished on an ‘as is’ basis and Carver County makes no representations or warranties, either expressed or implied, for the merchantability or fitness of theinformation provided for any purpose. This disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03 and the user of the dataprovided herein acknowledges that Carver County shall not be liable for any damages, and by using this data in any way expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and holdharmless Carver County, its officials, officers, agents, employees, etc. from any and all claims brought by anyone who uses the information provided for herein, its employees or agents, orthird parties which arise out of user's access. By acceptance of this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user includeswith the data a copy of this disclaimer. Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Carver Co unty, MN Net Acre s CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Review of Claims Paid 09092019 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.1. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on September 9, 2019: Check Numbers Amounts 171483 – 171560 $192,983.48 ACH Payments $406,446.61 Total All Claims $599,430.09 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 8/29/2019 3:11 PM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount ADVAIRRI Advantage Irrigation LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 136.45171483 AMECus AMEK Custom Builders Inc 08/22/2019 0.00 250.00171484 AMETIR AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 08/22/2019 0.00 539.84171485 ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 08/22/2019 0.00 380.36171486 UB*01597 CCA & T 08/22/2019 0.00 8.03171487 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 08/22/2019 0.00 204.28171488 CenLin CenturyLink 08/22/2019 0.00 64.00171489 CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA 08/22/2019 0.00 577.26171490 CLACCO CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 08/22/2019 0.00 48.45171491 CODYERIN Erin Cody 08/22/2019 0.00 250.00171492 UB*01754 JOHN & BRENDA COOPER 08/22/2019 0.00 80.63171493 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 08/22/2019 0.00 9,856.10171494 COYNHARO Harold Coyne 08/22/2019 0.00 2,180.55171495 DulSal Dultmeier Sales LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 187.95171496 EHLERS EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 08/22/2019 0.00 735.00171497 UB*01752 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 159.29171498 UB*01753 EXECUTIVE TITLE SERVICES 08/22/2019 0.00 33.79171499 FlePri FleetPride, Inc.08/22/2019 0.00 83.98171500 FLOTOT FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 08/22/2019 0.00 21.31171501 GERHTODD TODD GERHARDT 08/22/2019 0.00 266.60171502 GOGYMN Go Gymnastics 08/22/2019 0.00 469.00171503 GONHOM GONYEA HOMES 08/22/2019 0.00 750.00171504 GRABAR GRAYBAR 08/22/2019 0.00 2,358.72171505 HOOPTHRE Hoops & Threads LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 28.99171506 JenkJoel JOEL JENKINS 08/22/2019 0.00 204.00171507 JHLAR JH LARSON COMPANY 08/22/2019 0.00 165.30171508 JoneDavi David Jones 08/22/2019 0.00 100.00171509 KREEALLE Allen Kreemer 08/22/2019 0.00 250.00171510 LakCoun Lake Country Builders 08/22/2019 0.00 250.00171511 LANDTITL Land Title Inc 08/22/2019 VOID 334,123.66 0.00171512 LANSALAN ALAN LANGSETH 08/22/2019 0.00 408.00171513 MADGAL MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 08/22/2019 0.00 784.00171514 MCKMED McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 08/22/2019 0.00 131.66171515 MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 08/22/2019 0.00 13,399.00171516 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 08/22/2019 0.00 29.51171517 PAUPOP Paul Pope Builders LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 500.00171518 Pollar Pollard Water 08/22/2019 0.00 6.95171519 RECTCHAR Charles & Mindi Rector 08/22/2019 0.00 250.00171520 ROSCAR ROSELYN CARPET CLEANERS LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 855.00171521 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 08/22/2019 0.00 293.52171522 sioval Sioux Valley Environmental 08/22/2019 0.00 240.00171523 STAINV Staffmark Investment LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 112.25171524 TFOFIN TFORCE FINAL MILE 08/22/2019 0.00 35.63171525 OSSCON The Osseo Construction Company LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 86,307.97171526 TOWFEN TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 08/22/2019 0.00 4,000.00171527 TRUWES TruWest LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 9,250.00171528 TWIHAR TWIN CITY HARDWARE 08/22/2019 0.00 3.47171529 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (8/29/2019 3:11 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount ULINE ULINE INC 08/22/2019 0.00 45.55171530 UB*01755 APRIL WEBB 08/22/2019 0.00 9.09171531 ZAJIKERR Kerry & Abbie Zajicek 08/22/2019 0.00 500.00171532 BARCON BARBER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC08/29/2019 0.00 12,147.85171533 CAMEBRIA Brian Camey 08/29/2019 0.00 750.00171534 CenLin CenturyLink 08/29/2019 0.00 59.52171535 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 08/29/2019 0.00 4,741.02171536 FLOCON Flow Control Automation LLC 08/29/2019 0.00 3,865.00171537 gonhom GONYEA HOMES 08/29/2019 0.00 750.00171538 GuaGre Guaranteed Green, Inc.08/29/2019 0.00 150.00171539 HEALSTEV Steve Healy 08/29/2019 0.00 102.00171540 HENCOU HENNEPIN COUNTY 08/29/2019 0.00 1,600.00171541 HOOPTHRE Hoops & Threads LLC 08/29/2019 0.00 38.66171542 KERRMATT Matt Kerr 08/29/2019 0.00 960.00171543 MCDCON MCDONALD CONSTRUCTION 08/29/2019 0.00 8,950.00171544 MICBLU Michael Blue Productions LLC 08/29/2019 0.00 825.00171545 MILWIN Milbank Winwater Works 08/29/2019 0.00 1,399.18171546 MINROA Minnesota Roadways Co 08/29/2019 0.00 316.11171547 MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 08/29/2019 0.00 100.00171548 POST POSTMASTER 08/29/2019 0.00 649.03171549 RMBENV RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 08/29/2019 0.00 130.00171550 SAFBAS Safebasements of MN Inc 08/29/2019 0.00 500.00171551 SamLaw Sam's Lawn & Landscape 08/29/2019 0.00 2,229.95171552 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 08/29/2019 0.00 80.47171553 SHIPMELO Melonie Shipman 08/29/2019 0.00 85.00171554 SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 08/29/2019 0.00 850.00171555 SUBRAT SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 08/29/2019 0.00 1,356.00171556 TWIHAR TWIN CITY HARDWARE 08/29/2019 0.00 332.47171557 VALRIC VALLEY-RICH CO INC 08/29/2019 0.00 11,890.75171558 VIKELE VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 08/29/2019 0.00 19.91171559 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 08/29/2019 0.00 304.08171560 Report Total (78 checks): 192,983.48 334,123.66 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (8/29/2019 3:11 PM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 8/29/2019 3:11 PM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH AdvEng Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 08/22/2019 0.00 2,888.88 ACH ALEAIR ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 08/22/2019 0.00 140.00 ACH AMEENG AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING 08/22/2019 0.00 13,402.18 ACH BadSta Badger State Inspection LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 35,067.00 ACH LANZBOB BOB LANZI 08/22/2019 0.00 204.00 ACH carcou Carver County 08/22/2019 0.00 890.00 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 8,009.21 ACH DELDEN Delta Dental 08/22/2019 0.00 2,649.80 ACH EmeRes Emergency Response Solutions 08/22/2019 0.00 141.39 ACH FergEnte Ferguson Waterworks #2516 08/22/2019 0.00 4,829.88 ACH Avesis Fidelity Security Life 08/22/2019 0.00 234.59 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 08/22/2019 0.00 16,554.07 ACH HeaStr Health Strategies 08/22/2019 0.00 6,169.00 ACH IMPPOR IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 08/22/2019 0.00 4,918.25 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 08/22/2019 0.00 5,123.10 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 08/22/2019 0.00 28.00 ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 08/22/2019 0.00 4,162.86 ACH MACEQU MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 08/22/2019 0.00 62.08 ACH MidAqu Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 08/22/2019 0.00 2,631.00 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 08/22/2019 100.00 0.00 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 08/22/2019 0.00 241.75 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 08/22/2019 0.00 59.99 ACH PioEng Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 08/22/2019 0.00 10,320.00 ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 08/22/2019 0.00 9,897.85 ACH SPRPCS SPRINT PCS 08/22/2019 0.00 103.44 ACH STRGUA STRATOGUARD LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 176.00 ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 08/22/2019 0.00 275.80 ACH TarLea TargetSolutions Learning, LLC 08/22/2019 0.00 4,878.68 ACH VESSCO VESSCO INC 08/22/2019 0.00 4,270.52 ACH WARLIT Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 08/22/2019 0.00 506.30 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 08/22/2019 0.00 3,262.79 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 0.00 23,744.03 ACH A1ELE A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 08/29/2019 0.00 265.48 ACH ADAPES ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 08/29/2019 0.00 401.25 ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 08/29/2019 0.00 39.78 ACH BOYTRU Boyer Ford Trucks 08/29/2019 0.00 127.04 ACH BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 08/29/2019 0.00 883.25 ACH PedrChri Christine Lea Pedretti 08/29/2019 0.00 312.00 ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 08/29/2019 0.00 134.58 ACH EmeRes Emergency Response Solutions 08/29/2019 0.00 3,156.00 ACH FergEnte Ferguson Waterworks #2516 08/29/2019 0.00 2,200.00 ACH GSSys GS Systems, Inc. 08/29/2019 0.00 10,950.00 ACH IdeSer Ideal Service Inc. 08/29/2019 0.00 255.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 08/29/2019 0.00 110.68 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 0.00 187,481.28 ACH LOCSUP LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 08/29/2019 0.00 26.52 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 08/29/2019 0.00 140.93 Page 1 of 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC 08/29/2019 0.00 6,849.00 ACH SafFas Safe-Fast, Inc. 08/29/2019 0.00 52.50 ACH WENCK WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 0.00 792.00 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 08/29/2019 0.00 1,015.16 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 0.00 19,577.00 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 0.00 5,387.67 ACH ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 08/29/2019 0.00 447.05 Report Total: 100.00 406,446.61 Page 2 of 2 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM Name Check Dat Account Description Amount Advantage Irrigation LLC 08/22/2019 700-0000-4552 SVC call to 2086 Majestic Way 136.45 Advantage Irrigation LLC 136.45 AMEK Custom Builders Inc 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 6490 Devonshire Drive 250.00 AMEK Custom Builders Inc 250.00 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 08/22/2019 101-1550-4120 HER POWER ST2 ST TRAILER 438.10 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 08/22/2019 101-1550-4120 92S IRON RB12 NWS 94031.1 101.74 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 539.84 ASPEN MILLS 08/22/2019 101-1220-4240 CB Award Bar 5 Color 323.41 ASPEN MILLS 08/22/2019 101-1220-4240 Pants 56.95 ASPEN MILLS 380.36 BARBER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC08/29/2019 601-6042-4751 Lake Susan Trail Rehabilitation 12,147.85 BARBER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 12,147.85 Camey Brian 08/29/2019 815-8201-2024 Landscape Escrow - 2620 Arrowhead Lane 750.00 Camey Brian 750.00 CCA & T 08/22/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check - 52 Lake Riley Trail 3.61 CCA & T 08/22/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check - 52 Lake Riley Trail 3.36 CCA & T 08/22/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check - 52 Lake Riley Trail 1.06 CCA & T 8.03 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 08/22/2019 101-1171-4320 monthly charges 15.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 08/22/2019 701-0000-4320 monthly charges 17.11 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 08/22/2019 101-1600-4320 monthly charges 15.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 08/22/2019 101-1370-4320 monthly charges 41.08 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 08/22/2019 700-0000-4320 monthly charges 5.14 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 08/22/2019 701-0000-4320 monthly charges 5.14 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 08/22/2019 101-1220-4320 monthly charges 63.99 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 08/22/2019 101-1530-4320 monthly charges 41.82 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 204.28 CenturyLink 08/29/2019 700-7043-4310 Monthly Service - 8/13/19 to 9/12/19 59.52 CenturyLink 08/22/2019 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service - 8/1/19 to 8/31/19 32.00 CenturyLink 08/22/2019 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service - 8/1/19 to 8/31/19 32.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 1 of 7 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount CenturyLink 123.52 CITY OF CHASKA 08/22/2019 101-1560-4300 Summer Pops AOA Trip 7/23/19 577.26 CITY OF CHASKA 577.26 CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 08/22/2019 101-1550-4120 Short Sleeve Shirt 48.45 CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 48.45 Cody Erin 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 2215 Lukewood Drive 250.00 Cody Erin 250.00 COOPER JOHN & BRENDA 08/22/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 23.64 COOPER JOHN & BRENDA 08/22/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 37.98 COOPER JOHN & BRENDA 08/22/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.77 COOPER JOHN & BRENDA 08/22/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.24 COOPER JOHN & BRENDA 80.63 CORE & MAIN LP 08/22/2019 700-0000-4550 17 LB Anodes 7,007.52 CORE & MAIN LP 08/22/2019 700-0000-4552 Red Hydt Spray Paint 216.00 CORE & MAIN LP 08/22/2019 700-0000-4150 73206 3/4 CC Plug No Lead 75.53 CORE & MAIN LP 08/22/2019 700-0000-4552 Valves 187.50 CORE & MAIN LP 08/22/2019 700-0000-4550 Red Hydt Spray Paint 216.00 CORE & MAIN LP 08/22/2019 700-0000-4552 Connector, Ready Kit, Brackets, Snake Skin 2,153.55 CORE & MAIN LP 08/29/2019 700-0000-4550 Copper Tube, Pipes, Plugs 1,462.92 CORE & MAIN LP 08/29/2019 700-0000-4550 misc supplies/parts 3,278.10 CORE & MAIN LP 14,597.12 Coyne Harold 08/22/2019 101-1220-4300 NREMT Test and Pearson VUE - Feb 2019 90.00 Coyne Harold 08/22/2019 101-1220-4370 EMT Class, Lodging and meals - Mar 2019 2,090.55 Coyne Harold 2,180.55 Dultmeier Sales LLC 08/22/2019 400-0000-4704 misc parts/supplies 187.95 Dultmeier Sales LLC 187.95 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 08/22/2019 300-0000-4300 TIF Reporting - billing through 7/31/19 735.00 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 735.00 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 08/22/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 44.81 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 08/22/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 78.85 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 08/22/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 31.38 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 08/22/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.25 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 159.29 EXECUTIVE TITLE SERVICES 08/22/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.58 EXECUTIVE TITLE SERVICES 08/22/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 15.12 EXECUTIVE TITLE SERVICES 08/22/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.14 EXECUTIVE TITLE SERVICES 08/22/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.95 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 2 of 7 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount EXECUTIVE TITLE SERVICES 33.79 FleetPride, Inc.08/22/2019 101-1320-4120 Drain Valve 83.98 FleetPride, Inc. 83.98 Flow Control Automation LLC 08/29/2019 701-0000-4551 Air/Vacuum Valve 2,940.00 Flow Control Automation LLC 08/29/2019 701-0000-4551 Functional Unit w/cover 925.00 Flow Control Automation LLC 3,865.00 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 08/22/2019 101-1170-4530 New lock for cabinet 21.31 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 21.31 GERHARDT TODD 08/22/2019 101-1120-4370 Flight to ICMA Conference - Oct 2019 266.60 GERHARDT TODD 266.60 Go Gymnastics 08/22/2019 101-1537-4300 gymnastics class 7/24/19-8/21/19 469.00 Go Gymnastics 469.00 GONYEA HOMES 08/22/2019 815-8201-2024 Landscape Escrow - 7575 Fawn Hill Rd 750.00 GONYEA HOMES 08/29/2019 815-8201-2024 Landscape Escrow - 780 Hawkcrest Circle 750.00 GONYEA HOMES 1,500.00 GRAYBAR 08/22/2019 700-0000-4550 Holophane 2,358.72 GRAYBAR 2,358.72 Guaranteed Green, Inc.08/29/2019 101-1310-3629 Refund Encroachment 100.00 Guaranteed Green, Inc.08/29/2019 101-1310-3307 Refund Trenching Permit 50.00 Guaranteed Green, Inc. 150.00 Healy Steve 08/29/2019 101-1767-4300 Adult Softball Umpire - 4 games, 8/22/19 102.00 Healy Steve 102.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY 08/29/2019 101-1150-4300 8/1/18-7/31/19 Assessment Fees 1,600.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY 1,600.00 Hoops & Threads LLC 08/22/2019 700-0000-4240 hi-vis shirts - City of Chanhassen logo 14.50 Hoops & Threads LLC 08/22/2019 701-0000-4240 hi-vis shirts - City of Chanhassen logo 14.49 Hoops & Threads LLC 08/29/2019 701-0000-4240 City of Chanhassen Utilities Dept logo 19.33 Hoops & Threads LLC 08/29/2019 700-0000-4240 City of Chanhassen Utilities Dept logo 19.33 Hoops & Threads LLC 67.65 JENKINS JOEL 08/22/2019 101-1766-4300 Adult Summer Umpire - 8 games - 6/6, 7/11 204.00 JENKINS JOEL 204.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 3 of 7 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount JH LARSON COMPANY 08/22/2019 101-1190-4510 Lamps 165.30 JH LARSON COMPANY 165.30 Jones David 08/22/2019 101-1560-4300 8/27/19 The Statue of Liberty Presentation 100.00 Jones David 100.00 Kerr Matt 08/29/2019 101-1160-4370 Tuition Reimbursement - Intro to Coding 960.00 Kerr Matt 960.00 Kreemer Allen 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 7615 Kiowa 250.00 Kreemer Allen 250.00 Lake Country Builders 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 6275 Powers Blvd 250.00 Lake Country Builders 250.00 LANGSETH ALAN 08/22/2019 101-1766-4300 Adult Softball League - 8 games 408.00 LANGSETH ALAN 408.00 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 08/22/2019 101-1140-4302 Labor Relations Services - svc from July 2019 784.00 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 784.00 MCDONALD CONSTRUCTION 08/29/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 1641 Anthem Place 2,700.00 MCDONALD CONSTRUCTION 08/29/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 1581 Anthem Place 3,550.00 MCDONALD CONSTRUCTION 08/29/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 1651 Anthem Place 2,700.00 MCDONALD CONSTRUCTION 8,950.00 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 08/22/2019 101-1220-4130 Gloves, Bandages 131.66 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 131.66 Michael Blue Productions LLC 08/29/2019 101-1613-4300 Deposit for "Dweebs" July 3rd, 2020 825.00 Michael Blue Productions LLC 825.00 Milbank Winwater Works 08/29/2019 700-0000-4250 Meters 748.52 Milbank Winwater Works 08/29/2019 700-0000-4250 Meters 650.66 Milbank Winwater Works 1,399.18 Minnesota Roadways Co 08/29/2019 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Emulsion 316.11 Minnesota Roadways Co 316.11 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 08/22/2019 700-0000-4509 Water Supply Service Connection Fee 7/1/19-9/30/19 13,399.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 13,399.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 08/29/2019 701-0000-4530 Electrical Employer Registration Fee 100.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 4 of 7 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 100.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 08/22/2019 101-1550-4120 Switch 29.51 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 29.51 Paul Pope Builders LLC 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 3351 Shore Drive 500.00 Paul Pope Builders LLC 500.00 Pollard Water 08/22/2019 700-0000-4150 misc parts/supplies 6.95 Pollard Water 6.95 POSTMASTER 08/29/2019 700-0000-4330 Utility Statements 324.52 POSTMASTER 08/29/2019 701-0000-4330 Utility Statements 324.51 POSTMASTER 649.03 Rector Charles & Mindi 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 9107 Sunnyvale Drive 250.00 Rector Charles & Mindi 250.00 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 Labs 104.00 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 Labs 26.00 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 130.00 ROSELYN CARPET CLEANERS LLC 08/22/2019 101-1170-4300 Carpet cleaning - Senior Center, Admin City Hallway 855.00 ROSELYN CARPET CLEANERS LLC 855.00 Safebasements of MN Inc 08/29/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 8724 Valley View Place 500.00 Safebasements of MN Inc 500.00 Sam's Lawn & Landscape 08/29/2019 601-6042-4751 Lake Susan Bike Trail #PW440A 2,229.95 Sam's Lawn & Landscape 2,229.95 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 08/22/2019 701-0000-4150 Paint 293.52 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 08/29/2019 700-7019-4150 Clearcut Glide, Liner 15.62 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 08/29/2019 700-7019-4150 Paint and supplies 64.85 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 373.99 Shipman Melonie 08/29/2019 101-1560-4300 It's a Sled Dog's Life Presentation 85.00 Shipman Melonie 85.00 SIGNSOURCE 08/29/2019 101-1220-4120 Fire Dept Locker Tags, Par Tags and Helmet Graphics 850.00 SIGNSOURCE 850.00 Sioux Valley Environmental 08/22/2019 700-7043-4160 SVENFLOC 855A - 5 Gallon Pails 240.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 5 of 7 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount Sioux Valley Environmental 240.00 Staffmark Investment LLC 08/22/2019 101-1120-4020 8/4/19 Receptionist 112.25 Staffmark Investment LLC 112.25 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 08/29/2019 101-1310-4300 2019 Membership - 2nd half 1,356.00 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 1,356.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 08/22/2019 101-1410-4300 City Hall to Campbell Knutson 35.63 TFORCE FINAL MILE 35.63 The Osseo Construction Company LLC 08/22/2019 700-7050-4751 Water Tower #3 Rehabilitation 86,307.97 The Osseo Construction Company LLC 86,307.97 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 08/22/2019 101-1550-4300 Bluff Creek Rec Center Fence repair 4,000.00 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 4,000.00 TruWest LLC 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 765 Crossroads Ct 1,500.00 TruWest LLC 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 750 Crossroads Ct 1,500.00 TruWest LLC 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 735 Crossroads Ct 1,500.00 TruWest LLC 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 755 Crossroads Ct 1,500.00 TruWest LLC 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 795 Crossroads Ct 1,750.00 TruWest LLC 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 745 Crossroads Ct 1,500.00 TruWest LLC 9,250.00 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 08/22/2019 101-1190-4510 Wall Bumper 3.47 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 08/29/2019 700-7019-4150 misc parts/supplies 332.47 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 335.94 ULINE INC 08/22/2019 700-0000-4120 B35 POLY FORK WHEEL FOR PLLT TRK 45.55 ULINE INC 45.55 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 08/29/2019 700-0000-4552 Kerber and Saddlebrook 3,935.50 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 08/29/2019 700-0000-4552 Powers and Saddlebrook 4,799.75 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 08/29/2019 700-0000-4552 Powers and Saddlebrook 3,155.50 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 11,890.75 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 08/29/2019 101-1170-4150 Ballast 19.91 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 19.91 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 08/29/2019 101-1550-4300 garbage service - 8/1-8/15 304.08 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 304.08 WEBB APRIL 08/22/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.53 WEBB APRIL 08/22/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.56 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 6 of 7 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount WEBB APRIL 9.09 Zajicek Kerry & Abbie 08/22/2019 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 1512 Camden Ridge 500.00 Zajicek Kerry & Abbie 500.00 192,983.48 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 7 of 7 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM Name Check D Account Description Amount A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 08/29/2019 700-7019-4550 EWTP - Check Transfer Switch 75.00 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 08/29/2019 701-0000-4551 Lift Station #29 - Rewire VFD and Controls 190.48 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 265.48 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 08/29/2019 101-1190-4300 Quarterly Service 270.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 08/29/2019 101-1170-4300 Monthly Service 131.25 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 401.25 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 08/22/2019 700-0000-4300 2019 SCADA - svc from 7/6/19 to 8/2/19 2,888.88 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 2,888.88 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 08/22/2019 101-1220-4530 Qrtrly Compressor Air Quality Test, Station #1 140.00 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 140.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 08/22/2019 101-1539-4300 Personal Training 28.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 28.00 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING 08/22/2019 605-0000-4300 CSAH 101 Improvements 13,402.18 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING 13,402.18 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 08/29/2019 101-0000-2008 August 2019 premium 39.78 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 Badger State Inspection LLC 08/22/2019 700-7050-4706 Reconditioning Tower 3 Phase II Project Specs 11,300.00 Badger State Inspection LLC 08/22/2019 700-7050-4706 Reconditioning Tower 3 Inspection Services 20,017.00 Badger State Inspection LLC 08/22/2019 700-7050-4706 Project Management and Inspection Nextera Arboretum WT 750.00 Badger State Inspection LLC 08/22/2019 700-7050-4706 Project Management and Inspection Sprint Arboretum WT 1,500.00 Badger State Inspection LLC 08/22/2019 700-7050-4706 Project Management and Inspection Carver Cty Arboretum WT 1,500.00 Badger State Inspection LLC 35,067.00 Boyer Ford Trucks 08/29/2019 101-1320-4140 Tank - Surge 127.04 Boyer Ford Trucks 127.04 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 08/29/2019 601-6042-4300 Lake Susan Trail Rehab #PW440A - svc through 8/10/19 542.75 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 08/29/2019 420-4223-4300 2019 Seal Coat #19-03 - svc through 8/16/19 340.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 883.25 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 1 of 6 Name Check D Account Description Amount Carver County 08/22/2019 700-7043-4320 CarverLink Dark Fiber - WWTP - Aug 2019 350.00 Carver County 08/22/2019 101-1160-4320 CarverLink Internet/Fiber - Aug 2019 540.00 Carver County 890.00 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 08/22/2019 101-1220-4320 July 2019 134.38 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 08/22/2019 101-1350-4320 July 2019 3,509.03 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 08/22/2019 101-1540-4320 July 2019 394.63 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 08/22/2019 101-1550-4320 July 2019 420.21 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 08/22/2019 101-1600-4320 July 2019 32.22 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 08/22/2019 700-0000-4320 July 2019 123.46 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 08/22/2019 700-7019-4320 July 2019 1,962.88 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 08/22/2019 701-0000-4320 July 2019 1,432.40 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 8,009.21 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 08/29/2019 101-0000-2008 August 2019 premium 60.72 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 08/29/2019 700-0000-2008 August 2019 premium 36.93 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 08/29/2019 701-0000-2008 August 2019 premium 36.93 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 134.58 Delta Dental 08/22/2019 101-0000-2013 Sept insurance premium 2,025.55 Delta Dental 08/22/2019 101-0000-2013 Sept insurance premium - Cobra 30.20 Delta Dental 08/22/2019 210-0000-2013 Sept insurance premium 49.85 Delta Dental 08/22/2019 700-0000-2013 Sept insurance premium 275.35 Delta Dental 08/22/2019 701-0000-2013 Sept insurance premium 245.15 Delta Dental 08/22/2019 720-0000-2013 Sept insurance premium 23.70 Delta Dental 2,649.80 Emergency Response Solutions 08/22/2019 101-1220-4290 Towelettes, Cleaner 129.32 Emergency Response Solutions 08/22/2019 101-1220-4290 Valve, Flow Test 12.07 Emergency Response Solutions 08/29/2019 101-1220-4300 Face Piece Fit Test 820.00 Emergency Response Solutions 08/29/2019 101-1220-4530 Flow Test, Face Piece Test 2,336.00 Emergency Response Solutions 3,297.39 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 08/22/2019 700-0000-4250 misc parts/supplies 1,519.56 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 08/22/2019 700-0000-4550 misc parts/supplies 3,310.32 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 08/29/2019 700-0000-4530 Collector Repair 2,200.00 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 7,029.88 Fidelity Security Life 08/22/2019 101-0000-2007 Vision insurance - Sept 2019 191.55 Fidelity Security Life 08/22/2019 210-0000-2007 Vision insurance - Sept 2019 7.96 Fidelity Security Life 08/22/2019 700-0000-2007 Vision insurance - Sept 2019 19.62 Fidelity Security Life 08/22/2019 701-0000-2007 Vision insurance - Sept 2019 13.48 Fidelity Security Life 08/22/2019 720-0000-2007 Vision insurance - Sept 2019 1.98 Fidelity Security Life 234.59 GS Systems, Inc.08/29/2019 700-0000-4550 Software renewal/maintenance 5,475.00 GS Systems, Inc.08/29/2019 701-0000-4551 Software renewal/maintenance 5,475.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 2 of 6 Name Check D Account Description Amount GS Systems, Inc. 10,950.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 08/22/2019 700-7019-4160 Azone 5,055.26 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 08/22/2019 700-7019-4160 Corrosion Inhibitor, Sodium Permanganate 11,498.81 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 16,554.07 Health Strategies 08/22/2019 101-1220-4300 Medical Exam 5,996.00 Health Strategies 08/22/2019 101-1220-4300 Medical Evaluation, Mask Fit 173.00 Health Strategies 6,169.00 Ideal Service Inc.08/29/2019 700-0000-4550 Svc on Well #9 255.00 Ideal Service Inc. 255.00 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 08/22/2019 101-1550-4400 portable restrooms - July 2019 4,918.25 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 4,918.25 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 08/29/2019 101-1170-4110 Paper, Lubricant, Note pads 110.68 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 110.68 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 08/22/2019 400-4127-4705 Imaging Camera Kit, Charger 5,123.10 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 5,123.10 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 08/22/2019 101-1370-4170 Unleaded 87 Eth 10 4,162.86 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 4,162.86 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 605-0000-4300 TH 101 Reconstruction - svc through 7/31/19 187,481.28 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 187,481.28 LANZI BOB 08/22/2019 101-1766-4300 Adult Summer Umpire - 8 games 204.00 LANZI BOB 204.00 LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 08/29/2019 701-0000-4530 Recalibrate/reset counter on Gator Cam 26.52 LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 26.52 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 08/22/2019 701-0000-4140 Switch 62.08 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 62.08 Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 08/22/2019 101-1550-4300 Weed & Algae Control Treatment #1 and #2 891.00 Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 08/22/2019 101-1550-4300 Weed & Algae Control Treatment #1 1,113.00 Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 08/22/2019 101-1550-4300 Weed & Algae Control Treatment #1 and #2 627.00 Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 2,631.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 08/22/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 148.16 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 08/22/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 93.59 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 3 of 6 Name Check D Account Description Amount MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 08/29/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 107.98 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 08/29/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 32.95 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 382.68 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 08/22/2019 101-1220-4120 Oil Pressure Switch 7.39 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 08/22/2019 101-1550-4120 Trimmer Line 7.14 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 08/22/2019 101-1550-4120 Constant Velocity Joint Bo 4.29 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 08/22/2019 101-1320-4120 Oil Filters 22.31 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 08/22/2019 101-1550-4120 Coolant Reservoir 8.41 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 08/22/2019 101-1220-4120 Carburetor Kit 10.45 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 59.99 Pedretti Christine Lea 08/29/2019 101-1539-4300 8/27/19 Gentle and Vinyasa yoga 312.00 Pedretti Christine Lea 312.00 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.08/22/2019 601-6044-4751 119130 Bluff Creek Trail Rehab svc through 7/31/19 10,320.00 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 10,320.00 Potentia MN Solar 08/22/2019 700-0000-4320 June 2019 2,291.56 Potentia MN Solar 08/22/2019 101-1190-4320 June 2019 4,292.12 Potentia MN Solar 08/22/2019 101-1170-4320 June 2019 3,314.17 Potentia MN Solar 9,897.85 RBM SERVICES INC 08/29/2019 101-1190-4350 Library - Nighly/Weekend Janitorial - Sept 2019 3,370.00 RBM SERVICES INC 08/29/2019 101-1170-4350 Nighly Janitorial - Sept 2019 3,479.00 RBM SERVICES INC 6,849.00 Safe-Fast, Inc.08/29/2019 101-1320-4240 Vests 52.50 Safe-Fast, Inc. 52.50 SPRINT PCS 08/22/2019 700-0000-4310 monthly charges 51.72 SPRINT PCS 08/22/2019 701-0000-4310 monthly charges 51.72 SPRINT PCS 103.44 STRATOGUARD LLC 08/22/2019 101-1160-4300 Proofpoint Email Filtering Svc - Sept 176.00 STRATOGUARD LLC 176.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 08/22/2019 101-1220-4140 Guards, Liner 275.80 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 275.80 TargetSolutions Learning, LLC 08/22/2019 101-1220-4370 Premier Membership Platform 4,483.68 TargetSolutions Learning, LLC 08/22/2019 101-1220-4300 Maintenance Fee 395.00 TargetSolutions Learning, LLC 4,878.68 VESSCO INC 08/22/2019 700-7019-4150 Sigma/1 Control Ver b 4,270.52 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 4 of 6 Name Check D Account Description Amount VESSCO INC 4,270.52 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc.08/22/2019 700-0000-4552 Power Blvd/Santa Vera Dr - Barricades, Signs, Barrels 506.30 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 506.30 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 Stormwater Ordinance Revisions through July 31, 2019 792.00 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 792.00 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 08/22/2019 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant - 1/4" Fine Mix 728.45 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 08/22/2019 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant - 1/4" Fine Mix 900.15 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 08/22/2019 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant - 1/4" Fine Mix 556.75 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 08/22/2019 420-0000-4751 7901 Park Place - 1" Minus 741.69 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 08/22/2019 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant - 1/4" Fine Mix 335.75 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 08/29/2019 700-0000-4552 7901 Park Place - Class 5 Gravel, 1" Minus 501.76 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 08/29/2019 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant - 1/4" Fine Mix 513.40 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 4,277.95 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 101-1310-4300 2019 GIS Specialist Support Svc for July 2019 1,740.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 700-0000-4300 2019 GIS Specialist Support Svc for July 2019 1,087.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 701-0000-4300 2019 GIS Specialist Support Svc for July 2019 1,087.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 2019 GIS Specialist Support Svc for July 2019 435.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 101-1310-4300 2019 GIS/AMS Support Svc for July 2019 572.40 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 700-0000-4300 2019 GIS/AMS Support Svc for July 2019 357.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 701-0000-4300 2019 GIS/AMS Support Svc for July 2019 357.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 2019 GIS/AMS Support Svc for July 2019 143.10 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 2018 WCA Annual Reporting from July 2019 74.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 MCES Interceptor LGU Duties from July 2019 906.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 Carver County TH5 Regional Trail from July 2019 277.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 685 Pleasant View Road from July 2019 555.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 Pioneer Pass Wetland Monitoring LGU Review from July 2019 536.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 Moments WCA Review from July 2019 370.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 Holasek Farm Development from July 2019 148.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 701-0000-4300 Sewer CAD Model Update & Analysis from July 2019 436.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 605-0000-4300 Highway 101 Wetland Permitting from July 2019 #14-08 1,680.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 700-7050-4752 West Water Treatment Plant from July 2019 #15-03 8,429.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 601-6033-4752 Park Road Mill and Overlay from July 2019 #16-04 346.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/29/2019 720-0000-4300 Galpin Property WCA Review from July 2019 #19-10 37.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 19,577.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 700-7043-4320 electricity charges 7,182.56 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges -14.16 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 14.66 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 9,726.06 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges -20.15 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 36.29 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 128.84 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 700-7019-4320 electricity charges 6,694.67 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 12.16 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 101-1600-4320 electricity charges -17.37 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 700-0000-4320 electricity charges -22.17 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 11.32 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 5 of 6 Name Check D Account Description Amount XCEL ENERGY INC 08/22/2019 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 11.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 22.64 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 101-1540-4320 electricity charges 1,106.84 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 49.87 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 101-1550-4320 electricity charges -141.24 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 475.69 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 281.67 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 101-1170-4320 electricity charges -462.28 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 101-1190-4320 electricity charges 212.61 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 101-1220-4320 electricity charges 1,159.15 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 101-1370-4320 electricity charges 2,136.50 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 101-1171-4320 electricity charges 12.10 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 267.06 XCEL ENERGY INC 08/29/2019 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 267.06 XCEL ENERGY INC 29,131.70 ZIEGLER INC 08/29/2019 700-7019-4550 Svc Transfer Switch 447.05 ZIEGLER INC 447.05 406,446.61 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (08/29/2019 - 3:22 PM)Page 6 of 6 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 9, 2019 Subject Building Permit Data as of 09062019 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.2. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: ATTACHMENTS: Building Permit Data 09062019