FW Rick DorseyRick
As you requested, here are the soil borings we did for the project.
Lyndon
From: Nathen Will [mailto:nwill@srfconsulting.com]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 9:56 AM
To: Lyndon Robjent
Subject: RE: Rick Dorsey
Lyndon,
Attached is a smaller “scanned” version of the attachment which is approximately ½ the file size. This is the best I can do without losing quality of the image.
Just a side note, this attachment reflects the relative portions of the “plan” that I uploaded earlier to our FTP site with the filename “18_SAP_10-618-05_1981_C1-21.pdf” That file
is large (45MB).
Nate
From: Lyndon Robjent [mailto:lrobjent@co.carver.mn.us]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 7:22 AM
To: Nathen Will
Subject: Re: Rick Dorsey
Nathen
Can you email a smaller sized attachment. Thanks
Lyndon Robjent
Carver County Engineer/PWD
On Aug 16, 2013, at 2:50 PM, "Nathen Will" <nwill@srfconsulting.com> wrote:
Lyndon,
Wasn’t sure if you were looking for a response from us on this email or not. Several of Rick’s bullet points we view as being “closed items” based upon previous discussions with the
County. None the less, our responses are as follows:
2nd Paragraph regarding soil borings / determination – Upon review of our files, I wasn’t able to locate a request being made to either the County or SRF for the soil boring information.
Copies of the soils reports have been provided to the County. Let us know if you need further information. Regarding Rick’s statement about the “Is the county going to submit an application
along with me for a determination showing this to be incidental wetland?” What wetland is he referring to? I presume it’s Wetland #17 in front of his house. In short, I do not recall
any discussions about submitting a joint application with the County and Rick on the WCA application. We have reviewed Wetland 17 and we have no reason to believe it outside of WCA
jurisdiction and therefore at this time cannot consider it incidental. Rick will have an opportunity to present his data on Wetland 17 to the TEP. Ultimately, the WCA LGU will have
the final say whether Wetland 17 is jurisdictional (i.e. incidental or other).
Bullet Points in same order as original:
1. See attached PDF for 1981 Construction Plan (County) which clearly shows the location of existing cross culvert pipes that were present even before the County’s 1981/82 improvements
on Lyman. This plan even shows the proposed culvert (1981 plan) that exists currently today just to the east of the combined driveway to the north of Lyman (Sta. 19+30 equates to Sta.
209+60). Incidentally, notice the existing culvert (attached PDF) that was located just east of Sunset Trail which appears to have been directing flow (north to south) into Dorsey’s
property where Wetland 17 was delineated. This issue was responded to by County in letter to Rick dated 5/13/13, no further action.
2. Status of wetland determination – refer to previous email sent earlier today.
3. This issue was previously responded to by the County in a letter to Rick dated May 13, 2013. No further action.
4. I can only presume Rick is inquiring about the RI/RO which is not included in the plan. Again, the County provided a response to this in the 5/13/13 letter. We provided a revised
“sketch” showing the RI/RO location to the County on 6/27/13. Our scope does not include budget to coordinate / respond to questions regarding the RI/RO.
Sincerely,
Nathen
H:\Projects\6098-P3\_SENT\Client\130816_Response Dorsey\
From: Lyndon Robjent [mailto:lrobjent@co.carver.mn.us]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 7:40 PM
To: Bill Weckman; Nathen Will
Subject: Fwd: Rick Dorsey
Lyndon Robjent
Carver County Engineer/PWD
Begin forwarded message:
From: <rick.d@comcast.net>
Date: August 9, 2013, 3:38:32 PM CDT
To: Lyndon Robjent <lrobjent@co.carver.mn.us>
Cc: <plambert@co.carver.mn.us>
Subject: Rick Dorsey
Lyndon,
I am following up on our past meeting June 26 with SRF regarding wetlands and the drainage along the road.
You were going to try to find and copy me on the soil information from the files for the construction of the existing Lyman Blvd. and also send me the soil boring information you have
recently done. I didn’t hear back from you. Is the county going to submit an application along with me for a determination showing this to be incidental wetland?
Also, I got notice of a petition for condemnation of property yesterday from the County.
I would like to get an update on the following:
· The drainage issues we discussed at the northwest corner of our property including eliminating the culvert bringing water under the road from the north as historical maps
showed it staying to the north and that the culvert was moved two-three hundred feet to the west with the road construction in 1981.
· The status of the wetland determination on the south side of Lyman Blvd.
· Have any design changes been made to straighten out Sunset Trail making it safer by moving its intersection with Lyman Blvd. further west to align with our existing driveway
on the south side
· Lyman Blvd. alignment further north in front of our house. Thereby avoiding taking a disproportionate amount of land on our side of the section line and causing a loss of
the berm, trees and space distance between the road and the house.
· Right in right out along our westerly property line showing on project development maps
Please let me know if we should be meeting again with respect to any of the above issues and I will make myself available.
Rick Dorsey
952-831-7204
<130816_1980 Plan review.pdf>
UӫˑӬˑӬ˒{ӭ˒
ӭ˓
Ӯ˓ӯ˓`ӯ˔3Ӱ˔ӱ˔;ӱ˕XӲ˕ӳ˕ӳ˖}Ӵ˖Ӵ˗ӵ˗Ӷ˗]Ӷ˘5ӷ˘Ӹ˘8Ӹ˙[ӹ˙Ӻ˙Ӻ˚ӻ˚ӻ˛Ӽ˛ӽ˛[ӽ˜8Ӿ˜ӿ˜5ӿ˝]Ԁ˝ԁ˝ԁ˞Ԃ˞}Ԃ˟ԃ˟Ԅ˟XԄˠ;ԅˠԆˠ3Ԇˡ`ԇˡԈˡ
Ԉˢ
ԉˢ{ԉˣԊˣԋˣUԋˤ=Ԍˤԍˤ0ԍ˥cԎ˥ԏ˥
ԏ˦Ԑ˦xԐ˧ԑ˧Ԓ˧SԒ˨@ԓ˨Ԕ˨-Ԕ˩eԕ˩Ԗ˩Ԗ˪ԗ˪uԗ˫ Ԙ˫ԙ˫PԙˬCԚˬԛˬ*ԛ˭hԜ˭ԝ˭ԝˮԞˮrԞ˯ ԟ˯Ԡ˯MԠ˰Fԡ˰Ԣ˰(Ԣ˱kԣ˱Ԥ˱Ԥ˲ԥ˲pԥ˳#Ԧ˳ԧ˳Jԧ˴HԨ˴ԩ˴%ԩ˵nԪ˵Ԫ˶