The URL can be used to link to this page

WCA Notice of Decision Boundary and Type - 071919BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) City of Chanhassen Address 7700 Market Boulevard, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name TMSC of Chanhassen, LLC PO Box 16101 Mpls, MN 55416 Ebwright6@gmail.com Project Name Moments of Chanhassen Date of Application Received 6/11/19 Deemed completed 6/27/2019 Application Number WSB #13332- 000 Attach site locator map. Type of Decision: Wetland Boundary or Type No-Loss Exemption Sequencing Replacement Plan Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation (if any): Approve Approve with conditions Deny Summary (or attach): TEP members indicated they reviewed the site in the fall of 2018. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 7/19/19 Approved Approved with conditions (include below) Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): The applicant is requesting a wetland boundary/type decision for the Moments of Chanhassen project. A wetland delineation application was previously received in 2018. The application was deemed incomplete. It is the current LGU’s understanding that the TEP conducted a site visit in 2018 to review the line and indicated the wetland line needed to be adjusted and expanded. The applicant has completed an air photo review, conducted more transect sampling, expanded the wetland line based on the field visit, and addressed the other factors that resulted in the incomplete status. The application is now complete. The wetland boundary and type are approved. The wetland delineation indicates the wetland is 0.073 acres of a Type 1 / 2. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account # Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: Financial Assurance: For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR “Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants” and “Consent to Replacement Wetland” forms have been filed with the county recorder’s office in which the replacement wetland is located. Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Renae Clark Title Water Resources Coordinator Signature for Renae Clark Date 7/19/19 Phone Number and E-mail 952-227-1168 rclark@ci.chanhassen.mn.us THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT . Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal , the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send petition and $ fee (if applicable) to: Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send petition and $500 filing fee to: Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES SWCD TEP member: Aaron Finke; afinke@co.carver.mn.us BWSR TEP member: Ben Carlson; ben.carlson@state.mn.us LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): Renae Clark; rclark@ci.chanhassen.mn.us; Andi Moffatt; AMoffatt@wsbeng.com; DNR TEP member: Becky Horton; becky.horton@state.mn.us DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member) WD or WMO (if applicable): Terry Jeffery; tjeffery@rpbcwd.org Applicant and Landowner (if different): jacobsonenv@msn.com; Ebwright6@gmail.com Members of the public who requested notice: Erik Henricksen; EHenricksen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us; Ryan Pinkalla; RPinkalla@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Corps of Engineers Project Manager Melissa Jenny; Melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil; usace_requests_mn@usace.army.mil BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan decisions only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢ For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA_areas.pdf ➢ For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR_TEP_contacts.pdf ➢ Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE Bemidji, MN 56601 NE Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 1201 E. Hwy. 2 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 Central Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South New Ulm, MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr_regions.pdf ➢ For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 ➢ For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: Wetland Delination Report WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT 04/11/2019 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC jacobsonenv@msn.com 2018-295 Moments of Chanhassen Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 1 Table of Contents 1.0 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 EXISTING INFORMATION REVIEW ....................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1 Antecedent Precipitation ............................................................................................................. 3 2.1.2 National Wetlands Inventory ....................................................................................................... 3 2.1.3 Web Soil Survey ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.4 Public Waters Inventory ............................................................................................................... 3 2.1.5 Topographic Map ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.6 Aerial Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 FIELD DELINEATION ............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 Hydric Soils ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.3 Cautions Used in Applying the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils .................................................... 5 3.0 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 WETLAND BASIN DESCRIPTIONS ......................................................................................................... 6 4.0 CONFIRMATION OF JURISDICTIONAL STATUS ........................................................................................ 6 5.0 CERTIFICATION ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Appendices Appendix A Antecedent Precipitation Data Appendix B Sample Data Sheets Appendix C Site Photographs Appendix D Wetland Type and Boundary Approval Forms Appendix E Aerial Analysis Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 3 Soils Map Figure 4 Public Waters Inventory Map Figure 5 Delineation Map Figure 6 Topographic Map Figure 7 Hydric rating Map Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 2 1.0 SUMMARY Jacobson Environmental, PLLC (JE) visited the project site at PIDs 250101100 and 250101000 on October 11, 2018 and April 8, 2019. The site was approximately 3.49 acres in size, and was located at Sec. 10, T116N, R23W, Chanhassen, Minnesota. See Figure 1 for a Site Location Map. The purpose of the investigation was to identify areas within the project boundary meeting the technical criteria for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland basins, and classify the wetland habitat according to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. Wetlands are areas that are saturated or inundated with surface and or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in hydric soil conditions. Examples of wetlands include seasonally flooded basins, floodplain forests, wet meadows, shallow and deep marshes, shrub swamps, wooded swamps, fens, and bogs. Wetland boundaries were determined through a routine analysis of the vegetation, soils and hydrology which must all show wetland characteristics for an area to be delineated as a wetland. One basin was delineated within the project area, which is summarized below and shown on Figure 5. Basin ID Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers & Reed Dominant Vegetation Size (acres) 1 Type 2/1 PEMB/PFO 1A Wet Meadow/Floodplain Forest Slough Sedge, Reed Canary Grass, Black Willow 0.073 All figures and appendices referenced by this report are presented at the end of the text. This wetland delineation was performed by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC under the direction of Wayne Jacobson, Minnesota Professional Soil Scientist #30611, Society of Wetland Scientists – Professional Wetland Scientist #1000, University of Minnesota / BWSR Wetland Delineator, Certified #1019, American Fisheries Society – Associate Fisheries Scientist #A-171. 2.0 METHODS 2.1 EXISTING INFORMATION REVIEW Prior to field delineation, Jacobson Environmental reviewed the following information: Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 3 2.1.1 Antecedent Precipitation The previous three month’s precipitation data obtained from the Minnesota State Climatology Office suggest that the sampling period occurred under normal conditions on the October site visit and wetter than normal conditions on the April site visit. Antecedent precipitation data can be found in Appendix A. The growing season in this area is approximately from mid-April to mid-October, when the air temperature averages above 28 degrees F. This delineation was completed during the growing season. 2.1.2 National Wetlands Inventory The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) identified no wetlands within the property boundary (Figure 2). 2.1.3 Web Soil Survey The National Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey (Figure 7) identified the following soils: Soil Hydric Rating Kilkenny-Lester loams 0 Lester-Kilkenny loams 0 Lester-Kilkenny complex 5 2.1.4 Public Waters Inventory The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Waters Inventory shows that one public water exists on the property: Riley Creek, which runs approximately 445 feet along the northern edge of the property (Figure 4). The top of bank is shown in blue of Figure 5. 2.1.5 Topographic Map A topographic map with aerial photo overlay was obtained from MnTOPO (Figure 6). This map was reviewed for suspected wetland areas based on topography and vegetative cover. 2.1.6 Aerial Analysis A review of historic aerial photos was completed. See Appendix E. 2.2 FIELD DELINEATION Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 4 The wetlands on the subject property were delineated using the routine determination methodology set forth in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region as follows: 1) The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine whether 50% of the dominant plant species were hydrophytic using the 50/20 method. 2) Soil pits were dug using a Dutch auger to depths of 18”-40”, noting soil profiles and any hydric soil characteristics. 3) Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and were compared to field criteria such as depth to shallow water table and depth of soil saturat ion found in the soil pits. Transects were established in representative areas of each wetland. Each transect consisted of one sample point within the wetland and one sample point in upland. Other areas which have one or more of the wetland vegetation, soils, or hydrologic characteristics present, or where questionable conditions exist may also have been sampled. Data sheets for each sample point are available in Appendix B. Wetland classifications discussed in the text are set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (FWS/OBS Publication 79/31, Cowardin et al. 1979) and Wetlands of the United States (USFWS Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine, 1971.) Additionally, plant community types as named by Eggers and Reed (1998) are given. Wetland edges were marked with orange numbered pin flags or “wetland boundary” flagging tape on vegetation as site conditions warrant. Sample points are marked with orange numbered pin flags. Any wetlands or sample points were mapped using GPS. 2.2.1 Vegetation The plant species within the parcel were cataloged and assigned a wetland indicator status according to: Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin, 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 Wetland Ratings, Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. In the text of this report and on the enclosed data forms, the plant indicator status follows the plant’s scientific name unless a status has not been assigned. The hydrophytic plant criterion is met when more than 50 percent of the dominant species by the 50/20 rule for each stratum (herb, shrub/sapling, tree, and woody vine) were assigned an obligate (OBL)1, facultative wet (FACW), and/or facultative (FAC) wetland status. 1 OBL=Obligate Wetland, occurs an estimated 99% in wetlands. FACW=Facultative Wetland, has an estimated 67%-99% probability of occurrence in wetlands. FAC=Facultative, is equally likely to occur in wetlands and non -wetlands, 34%-66% probability. FACU=Facultative Upland, occurs in wetlands only occasionally, 1%-23% probability. UPL=Upland, almost never occurs in wetlands, <1% probability. NI= No Indicator, insufficient information available to determine an indicator status. Positive or negative sign previously indicated a frequency toward higher (+) or lower (-) frequency of occurrence within a category. Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 5 With the 50/20 rule, dominants are generally measured by absolute % cover in each stratum which individually or collectively account for more than 50% of total vegetative cover in the stratum, plus any other species which itself accounts for at least 20% of the total vegetative cover. 2.2.2 Hydric Soils A hydric soil is a soil formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. If a soil exhibits the indicators of a hydric soil or is identified as a hydric soil the hydric soil criterion is met. The break between hydric and non-hydric soils was determined by excavating soil pits along transects crossing the wetland/upland eco-tone and evaluating the soil colors, textures, and presence or absence of redoximorphic indicators (i.e., mottles, gley or oxidized rhizospheres). Hydric Soil Indicators for the Midwest Region were noted as presented in the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States version 8.1 (USDA NRCS 2017) if present at each sample point. Upper soil profiles were also compared to the mapped or inclusionary soil series found in the sample area for soil identification purposes. 2.2.3 Cautions Used in Applying the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils There are hydric soils with morphologies that are difficult to interpret. These include soils with black, gray, or red parent material; soils with high pH; soils high or low in content of organic matter; recently developed hydric soils, and soils high in iron inputs. In some cases, we do not currently have indicators to assist in the identification of hydric soils in these situations. If the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil, the lack of an indicator does not preclude the soil from being hydric. The indicators were developed mostly to identify the boundary of hydric soil areas and generally work best on the margins. Not all the obviously wetter hydric soils will be identified by the indicators. Redoximorphic features are most likely to occur in soils that cycle between anaerobic (reduced) and aerobic (oxidized) conditions. Morphological features of hydric soils indicate that saturation and anaerobic conditions have existed under either contemporary or former hydrologic regimes. Where soil morphology seems inconsistent with the landscape, vegetation, or observable hydrology, it may be necessary to obtain the assistance of an experienced soil or wetland scientist to determine whether the soil is hydric. To clarify, when investigating hydric soils in this area, one must consider the following: • Many of these soils have black or gray parent materials . • Many of the soils have a high organic matter content. • The hydric soil margin is typically higher than the wetland boundary margin on the site . • Not all the obviously wetter soils will be identified by the indicators. • Many of the hydric soils are Mollisols which are classic problem hydric soils in many cases . Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 6 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 WETLAND BASIN DESCRIPTIONS Basin 1 Basin 1 was an approximately 0.073-acre, type 2/1, PEMB/PFO1A, wet meadow/floodplain forest wetland. The basin was dominated by Slough Sedge (OBL), Reed Canary Grass (FACW), and Black Willow (OBL). Hydrology indicators included A2 (high water table), A3 (saturation), D2 (geomorphic position) and D5 (FAC neutral test). Wetland soils met indicators F3 (depleted matrix), A11 (depleted below dark surface), A12 (thick dark surface), and F6 (redox dark surface). Adjacent upland was typically dominated by Tall Goldenrod (FACU), Reed Canary Grass (FACW), Kentucky Bluegrass (FAC), and Common Buckthorn (FAC). Primary hydrology indicators were not observed at the upland sample point. Hydric soil indicator F6 was found in the upland at sample point 1-2- UP. The wetland boundary followed a change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a gradual to distinct change in topography. The basin was not shown as a wetland on the NWI map (Figure 2) and was located within an area mapped as Kilkenny-Lester loam (RATING=0) by the Web Soil Survey (Figure 7). Sample data sheets 1-UP/1-WET through 1-4-UP/1-4-WET in Appendix B correspond to this basin. 4.0 CONFIRMATION OF JURISDICTIONAL STA TUS Jacobson Environmental is submitting this report to the client and regulatory agencies to request a wetland boundary and type determination. We have enclosed an official WCA Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary form in Appendix D along with a USCOE wetland delineation concurrence request. 5.0 CERTIFICATION I certify that this wetland delineation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. This was a Routine On-Site Determination and the results reflect the conditions present at the time of the delineation. Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW’s-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans 7 I certify that this report has been prepared in accordance with regulatory standards. Thank you for the opportunity to provide wetland services on this important project. If any wetland impacts are planned for this project, permits would be necessary from the LGU and other agencies. 04/11/2019 Figure Map data ©2018 Google 1000 ft 1620 Arboretum Blvd Figure 1 Site Map Soil Map—Carver County, Minnesota (Figure 3 Soils Map) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/15/2018 Page 1 of 34967960496798049680004968020496804049680604968080496810049679604967980496800049680204968040496806049680804968100455430455450455470455490455510455530455550455570455590455610455630455650455670 455430 455450 455470 455490 455510 455530 455550 455570 455590 455610 455630 455650 455670 44° 51' 54'' N 93° 33' 51'' W44° 51' 54'' N93° 33' 39'' W44° 51' 48'' N 93° 33' 51'' W44° 51' 48'' N 93° 33' 39'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 15 30 60 90 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,120 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI KB Kilkenny-Lester loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes 4.4 73.5% KC Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes 1.5 25.1% KC2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 0.1 1.4% KE2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 16 to 22 percent slopes 0.0 0.0% Totals for Area of Interest 6.0 100.0% Soil Map—Carver County, Minnesota Figure 3 Soils Map Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/15/2018 Page 3 of 3 0 0.025 0.05 0.0750.0125 Miles The State of Minnesota and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources makes no representationsor warranties expressed or implied, with respect to the use of maps or geographic data providedherewith regardless of its format or the means of its transmission. There is no guarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy, currency, suitability, or reliability of this datafor any purpose. The user accepts the data “as is." The State of Minnesota assumes no responsibility for loss or damage incurred as a result of any user reliance on this data. All maps and other material provided herein are protected by copyright. Extreme care was used during the compilation of this product. However, due to changes in ownership and the need to rely on outside information, errors or omissions may exist. If you should discover an oversight, we encourage you to let us know by calling the DNR at 1-888-646-6367 or by e-mail at info.dnr@state.mn.us. Note: Elevation images and contours were generated from LiDAR derived elevation surfaces acquired 2007-2012. ³ Created on 10/11/2018 Figure 6 Topographic Map 1:3 ,07 4Scale: Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Carver County, Minnesota (Figure 7 Hydric Rating Map) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/15/2018 Page 1 of 54967960496798049680004968020496804049680604968080496810049679604967980496800049680204968040496806049680804968100455430455450455470455490455510455530455550455570455590455610455630455650455670 455430 455450 455470 455490 455510 455530 455550 455570 455590 455610 455630 455650 455670 44° 51' 54'' N 93° 33' 51'' W44° 51' 54'' N93° 33' 39'' W44° 51' 48'' N 93° 33' 51'' W44° 51' 48'' N 93° 33' 39'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 15 30 60 90 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,120 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Hydric Rating by Map Unit Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI KB Kilkenny-Lester loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes 0 4.4 73.5% KC Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes 0 1.5 25.1% KC2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 5 0.1 1.4% KE2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 16 to 22 percent slopes 5 0.0 0.0% Totals for Area of Interest 6.0 100.0% Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Carver County, Minnesota Figure 7 Hydric Rating Map Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/15/2018 Page 3 of 5 Appendices Appendix A Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home | current conditions | journal | past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | about us Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Carver township number: 116N township name: Lake Minnewashta range number: 23W nearest community: Carver Beach section number: 10 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Thursday, October 11, 2018 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar-based estimates. first prior month: September 2018 second prior month: August 2018 third prior month: July 2018 estimated precipitation total for this location:missing 1.85R 4.88R there is a 30% chance this location will have less than:2.50 3.04 3.10 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than:4.46 5.35 4.18 type of month: dry normal wet missing dry wet monthly score missing 2 * 1 = 2 1 * 3 = 3 multi-month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet)missing Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home | current conditions | journal | past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | about us Nearest Station Precipitation Data Retrieval Minnesota's precipitation data archive is searched for data closest to a selected target location for each month. Values from the site closest to the target location are returned below after clicking the retrieve monthly data or retrieve daily data buttons. The precipitation data are made up of measured rainfall and the measured liquid content of snowfall. Temperature, snowfall, and snow depth data from National Weather Service reporting stations are no longer retrieved from this application. To obtain those data, see our newest data retrieval tool (May 2014). National Weather Service precipitation data continue to be available from this application. Obtaining data for legal purposes Guide for column headers in the data table target location: Carver-Lake minnewashta-Carver Beach 116N 23W S10 (latitude: 44.87032 longitude: 93.57186) click to select target location years: 2018 to 2018 number of missing days allowed per month: 3 retrieve monthly data retrieve daily data results: Target: T116 R23 S10 mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn oooooooo pre (inches) dis Jan 2018 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS 1.42 0 mi. Feb 2018 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS 1.28 0 mi. Mar 2018 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS 1.29 0 mi. Apr 2018 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS 2.59 0 mi. May 2018 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS 3.19 0 mi. Jun 2018 10 116N 23W 15 BYRG 5.22 0 mi. Jul 2018 10 116N 23W 15 BYRG 4.59 0 mi. Aug 2018 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS 1.74 0 mi. Sep 2018 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS 5.95 0 mi. Oct 2018 66 112N 22W 35 SWCD 2.44 28 mi. Nov 2018 m 999 mi. Dec 2018 m 999 mi. Where indicated: Missing values are shown as 'm'. Days on which precip accumulated in the gage are shown as '-'. 'TTTT RR SS' is the 'public land survey(PLS)' or 'legal' location of the observed data. Section values greater 36 are SECTIC 'TIC' locations plus 100. 'NWS ID' the National Weather Service Cooperative station number. Note that the 'PLS' will always be correct for precipitation data while the 'NWS ID' will always be correct for the temperature data. If no PLS info is supplied the the 'NWS ID' number applies to all shown data. State Climatology Office - MnDNR - Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home | current conditions | journal | past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | about us Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Carver township number: 116N township name: Lake Minnewashta range number: 23W nearest community: Carver Beach section number: 10 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Monday, April 8, 2019 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar-based estimates. first prior month: March 2019 second prior month: February 2019 third prior month: January 2019 estimated precipitation total for this location:missing missing missing there is a 30% chance this location will have less than:1.15 0.43 0.45 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than:2.05 0.88 1.11 type of month: dry normal wet missing missing missing monthly score missing missing missing multi-month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet)missing Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) 2.08 2.26 0.52 wet wet normal 3*3=9 2*3=6 1*2=2 17 (wet) Appendix B Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Moments of Chanhassen City/County:Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:10/11/18 Applicant/Owner:Patrick Sarver State:Minnesota Sampling Point:1-UP Investigator(s):ACM Section, Township, Range:Sec. 10, T116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):sideslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):linear 4 Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: Y , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes, or hydrology (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Y N N N If yes, optional wetland site ID: VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute % Cover Dominan t Species Indicator StausTree Stratum (Plot size:30' radius Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:3Acer negundo 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:4 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:75.00% 15 (Plot size:15' radius Rhamnus cathartica 30 Y FAC 0 0 50 100 45 135 30 120 30 0 0 (Plot size:5' radius 125 355 Phalaris arundinacea 50 Y FACW 2.84 Solidago altissima 30 Y FACU Coronilla varia 15 N NI Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Y0 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)95 (Plot size:30' radius *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region TMSC of Chanhassen, LLC Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) SOIL Sampling Point:1-UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-8 10YR3/2 100 sandy loam contained gravel 8-24 10YR4/3 100 sandy clay loam contained gravel *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2)Sandy Redox (S5)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Black Histic (A3)Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10)Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type:Hydric soil present?N Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2)Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present?Yes No X Depth (inches):- (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Saturation present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Y0 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)97 (Plot size:30' radius *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Salix nigra 2 N OBL Phalaris arundinacea 20 Y FACW Solidago gigantea 15 N FACW Poa pratensis 5 N FAC 10 0 0 (Plot size:5' radius 137 192 Carex atherodes 55 Y OBL 1.40 10 30 0 0 Rhamnus cathartica 5 Y FAC 92 92 35 70 30 (Plot size:15' radius Salix nigra 5 Y OBL Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100.00% Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:5 Absolute % Cover Dominan t Species Indicator StausTree Stratum (Plot size:30' radius Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:5Salix nigra 30 Y OBL (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Y Y Y Y If yes, optional wetland site ID: VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Soil Map Unit Name:Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: Y , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes, or hydrology Investigator(s):ACM Section, Township, Range:Sec. 10, T116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave 1 Lat:Long:Datum: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Moments of Chanhassen City/County:Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:10/11/18 Applicant/Owner:Patrick Sarver State:Minnesota Sampling Point:1-WET US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region TMSC of Chanhassen, LLC Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):8 Saturation present?Yes X No Depth (inches):2 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present?Yes No X Depth (inches):- Water Marks (B1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2)Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type:Hydric soil present?Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Black Histic (A3)Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10)Depleted Matrix (F3) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2)Sandy Redox (S5)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 6-12 10YR5/2 98 7.5YR4/6 2 C PL sandy clay loam 0-6 10YR3/2 100 sandy clay loam SOIL Sampling Point:1-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Y0 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)95 (Plot size:30' radius *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Coronilla varia 5 N UPL Phalaris arundinacea 25 Y FACW Urtica dioica 20 Y FACW Poa pratensis 15 N FAC 25 5 25 (Plot size:5' radius 120 355 Solidago altissima 30 Y FACU 2.96 40 120 30 120 0 0 45 90 0 (Plot size:15' radius Rhamnus cathartica 25 Y FAC Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:75.00% Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:4 Absolute % Cover Dominan t Species Indicator StausTree Stratum (Plot size:30' radius Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:3 (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Y Y N N If yes, optional wetland site ID: Antecedent precipitation data indicate wetter than normal conditions. See Appendix A. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Soil Map Unit Name:Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: N , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes, or hydrology Investigator(s):ACM Section, Township, Range:Sec. 10, T116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):sideslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):linear 5 Lat:Long:Datum: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Moments of Chanhassen City/County:Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:4/8/19 Applicant/Owner:Patrick Sarver State:Minnesota Sampling Point:1-2-UP US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region TMSC of Chanhassen, LLC Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Saturation present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present?Yes No X Depth (inches):- Water Marks (B1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2)Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type:Hydric soil present?Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Black Histic (A3)Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10)Depleted Matrix (F3) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2)Sandy Redox (S5)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 16-24 10YR2/1 100 sandy clay loam 6-16 10YR3/2 95 7.5YR4/6 5 C PL sandy clay loam 0-6 10YR2/2 100 sandy loam SOIL Sampling Point:1-2-UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Y0 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)95 (Plot size:30' radius *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Solidago altissima 15 N FACU Poa pratensis 10 N FAC 0 0 0 (Plot size:5' radius 95 230 Phalaris arundinacea 70 Y FACW 2.42 10 30 15 60 0 0 70 140 0 (Plot size:15' radius Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100.00% Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:1 Absolute % Cover Dominan t Species Indicator StausTree Stratum (Plot size:30' radius Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:1 (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Y Y Y Y If yes, optional wetland site ID: Antecedent precipitation data indicate wetter than normal conditions. See Appendix A. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Soil Map Unit Name:Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: N , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes, or hydrology Investigator(s):ACM Section, Township, Range:Sec. 10, T116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave 1 Lat:Long:Datum: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Moments of Chanhassen City/County:Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:4/8/19 Applicant/Owner:Patrick Sarver State:Minnesota Sampling Point:1-2-WET US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region TMSC of Chanhassen, LLC Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Saturation present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present?Yes No X Depth (inches):- Water Marks (B1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2)Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type:Hydric soil present?Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Black Histic (A3)Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10)Depleted Matrix (F3) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2)Sandy Redox (S5)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 20-24 10YR2/1 100 clay loam 8-20 10YR4/2 85 2.5Y5/2 15 C PL silty clay loam 0-8 10YR2/1 100 silty clay loam SOIL Sampling Point:1-2-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Moments of Chanhassen City/County:Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:4/8/19 Applicant/Owner:Patrick Sarver State:Minnesota Sampling Point:1-3-UP Investigator(s):ACM Section, Township, Range:Sec. 10, T116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):sideslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):linear 3 Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: N , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes, or hydrology (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Y N N N If yes, optional wetland site ID: Antecedent precipitation data indicate wetter than normal conditions. See Appendix A. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute % Cover Dominan t Species Indicator StausTree Stratum (Plot size:30' radius Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:3Acer negundo 7 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:3 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100.00% 7 (Plot size:15' radius Rhamnus cathartica 35 Y FAC 0 0 0 0 102 306 3 12 35 0 0 (Plot size:5' radius 105 318 Poa pratensis 60 Y FAC 3.03 Solidago altissima 3 N FACU Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Y0 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)63 (Plot size:30' radius *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region TMSC of Chanhassen, LLC Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) SOIL Sampling Point:1-3-UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-14 10YR3/2 100 sandy clay loam 14-24 10YR6/1 100 sandy clay loam *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2)Sandy Redox (S5)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Black Histic (A3)Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10)Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type:Hydric soil present?N Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2)Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present?Yes No X Depth (inches):- (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Saturation present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Y0 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)95 (Plot size:30' radius *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Phalaris arundinacea 5 N FACW 16 0 0 (Plot size:5' radius 111 125 Carex atherodes 90 Y OBL 1.13 3 9 0 0 Rhamnus cathartica 3 N FAC 100 100 Cornus alba 3 N FACW 8 16 0 (Plot size:15' radius Salix nigra 10 Y OBL Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100.00% Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:2 Absolute % Cover Dominan t Species Indicator StausTree Stratum (Plot size:30' radius Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:2 (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Y Y Y Y If yes, optional wetland site ID: Antecedent precipitation data indicate wetter than normal conditions. See Appendix A. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Soil Map Unit Name:Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: N , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes, or hydrology Investigator(s):ACM Section, Township, Range:Sec. 10, T116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave 1 Lat:Long:Datum: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Moments of Chanhassen City/County:Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:4/8/19 Applicant/Owner:Patrick Sarver State:Minnesota Sampling Point:1-3-WET US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region TMSC of Chanhassen, LLC Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Saturation present?Yes X No Depth (inches):20 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present?Yes No X Depth (inches):- Water Marks (B1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2)Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type:Hydric soil present?Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Black Histic (A3)Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10)Depleted Matrix (F3) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2)Sandy Redox (S5)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 18-24 2.5Y5/2 85 7.5YR4/4 15 C PL sandy clay loam 6-18 10YR2/1 95 7.5YR4/6 5 C PL sandy clay loam 0-6 10YR2/1 100 silty clay loam SOIL Sampling Point:1-3-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Hydrophytic vegetation present?N0 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)95 (Plot size:30' radius *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Phalaris arundinacea 35 Y FACW Urtica dioica 5 N FACW 11 5 25 (Plot size:5' radius 106 331 Solidago altissima 55 Y FACU 3.12 0 0 55 220 Ulmus pumila 5 Y UPL 6 6 40 80 0 (Plot size:15' radius Salix nigra 6 Y OBL Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:50.00% Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:4 Absolute % Cover Dominan t Species Indicator StausTree Stratum (Plot size:30' radius Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:2 (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) N N N N If yes, optional wetland site ID: Antecedent precipitation data indicate wetter than normal conditions. See Appendix A. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Soil Map Unit Name:Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: N , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes, or hydrology Investigator(s):ACM Section, Township, Range:Sec. 10, T116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):linear 8 Lat:Long:Datum: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Moments of Chanhassen City/County:Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:4/8/19 Applicant/Owner:Patrick Sarver State:Minnesota Sampling Point:1-4-UP US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region TMSC of Chanhassen, LLC Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology present?N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Saturation present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present?Yes No X Depth (inches):- Water Marks (B1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2)Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type:Hydric soil present?N Depth (inches): Remarks: Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Black Histic (A3)Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10)Depleted Matrix (F3) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2)Sandy Redox (S5)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 6-24 2.5Y4/3 98 7.5YR4/4 2 C PL sandy clay loam 0-6 10YR3/2 100 sandy clay loam SOIL Sampling Point:1-4-UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Hydrophytic vegetation present?Y0 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)95 (Plot size:30' radius *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Solidago altissima 15 N FACU Poa pratensis 5 N FAC 7 0 0 (Plot size:5' radius 102 232 Phalaris arundinacea 75 Y FACW 2.27 5 15 15 60 7 7 75 150 0 (Plot size:15' radius Salix nigra 7 Y OBL Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100.00% Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:2 Absolute % Cover Dominan t Species Indicator StausTree Stratum (Plot size:30' radius Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:2 (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Y Y Y Y If yes, optional wetland site ID: Antecedent precipitation data indicate wetter than normal conditions. See Appendix A. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Soil Map Unit Name:Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: N , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes, or hydrology Investigator(s):ACM Section, Township, Range:Sec. 10, T116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave 1 Lat:Long:Datum: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Moments of Chanhassen City/County:Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:4/8/19 Applicant/Owner:Patrick Sarver State:Minnesota Sampling Point:1-4-WET US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region TMSC of Chanhassen, LLC Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Indicators of wetland hydrology present?Y Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Saturation present?Yes No X Depth (inches):>24 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present?Yes No X Depth (inches):- Water Marks (B1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2)Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type:Hydric soil present?Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Black Histic (A3)Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10)Depleted Matrix (F3) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1)Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2)Sandy Redox (S5)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 16-24 2.5Y5/2 85 7.5YR4/4 15 C PL sandy clay loam 6-16 10YR2/1 90 7.5YR4/6 5 C PL sandy clay loam 0-6 10YR2/1 100 silty clay loam SOIL Sampling Point:1-4-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Appendix C 1-UP 1-WET 1-Representative Gulley to Riley Creek Riley Creek Culvert 1-2-UP 1-2-WET 1-2-Representative 1-3-UP 1-3-WET 1-3-Representative 1-4-UP 1-4-WET 1-4-Representative Appendix D Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: 2018-295 PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the ag ent’s contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Patrick Sarver Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Wayne Jacobson Mailing Address: 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Phone: (612)802-6619 E-mail Address: jacobsonenv@msn.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Carver City/Township: Chanhassen Parcel ID and/or Address: 250101100, 250101000 Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): Sec. 10, T116N, R23W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highw ays. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 3.49 acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. TMSC of Chanhassen, LLC PO Box 16101, Minneapolis, MN 55416 612-849-0200 ebwright6@gmail.com Elizabeth Wright Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: 2018-295 PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact1 Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identif y each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead vie w map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the propose d impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following t able. Aquatic Resource ID (as noted on overhead view) Aquatic Resource Type (wetland, lake, tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)1 Size of Impact2 Overall Size of Aquatic Resource 3 Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area4 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Area5 1If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the “T”. For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered “T (220)”. 2Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter “N/A”. 4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I poss ess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: Date: I hereby authorize Wayne Jacobson to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term “impact” as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. 4/18/19 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: 2018-295 Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): Wetland Type Confirmation Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not a ddress the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generall y be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx Appendix E Moments of Chanhassen 12/2/18 Carver ACM 116N 23W 10 4-1991 USGS N SS 8-2002 USGS W 4-2003 USGS N NV 4-2004 USGS W 3-2006 USGS N NV 9-2008 USGS D 9-2009 USGS N NV 5-2010 USGS N NV 4-2011 USGS N NV 4-2012 USGS N NV 9-2013 USGS N NV 8-2015 USGS W 3-2016 USGS N NV 4-2017 USGS D 4-2018 USGS W A A 9 1 11 A N N 11 Y Y A