The URL can be used to link to this page

08-2-95 Agenda and Packet FILE AGENDA CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSII WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1995, 7:00 P.._,. CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 690 COULTER DRIVE CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Lundgren Bros. request for a sign height variance to allow an 8 ft. high entry monument sign to be located at the intersections of Galpin Blvd. and Hunter Drive and Hwy. 41 and Longactes Drive. 2. Bluff Creek Golf Couse has submitted an application for an Interim Use Peim it for the filling and stabilization of an existing ravine on Bluff Creek Golf Course. Due to the size of the ravine, this project will be ongoing as clean fill becomes available. The interim use permit will be reviewed annually. 3. *Item deleted and rescheduled for August 16, 1995. 4. Site Plan Review of a 9,161 square foot office/warehouse facility on a 1.57 acre lot, property zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development Industrial, located on Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen Business Center 2nd Addition, Highland Development, Inc. 5. *Item deleted and rescheduled for August 16, 1995. 6. Preliminary plat approval subdividing Outlot B, McGlynn Park Addition, an 8.79 acre parcel, into one lot of 1.15 acres and one outlot of 7.64 acres; site plan review of an 8,044 sq. ft. building and a conditional use permit for a day care center on property zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park and located at McGlynn Drive and Audubon Road, Children's World Learning Center, Inc. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS APPROVAL OF MINUTES CITY COUNCIL UPDATE ONGOING ITEMS OPEN DISCUSSION ADJOURNMENT NOTE: Planning Commission meetings are scheduled to end by 10:30 p.m. as outlined in official by-laws. We will make every attempt to complete the hearing for each item on the agenda. If, however, this does not appear to be possible, the Chair person will notify those present and offer rescheduling options. Items thus pulled from consideration will be listed first on the agenda at the next Commission meeting. Items Deleted 3. James and Karen Meyer for a preliminary plat request to subdivide 6.55 acres into 4 single family lots and variance request to Section 18-57(o) which allows up to four lots to be served by a private drive on property located at 6225 Ridge Road, north of Pleasant View Road, James and Karen Meyers. 5. Conditional Use Permit for Multiple Buildings (2) on the same lot and site plan approval for a 1,255 sq. ft. drive through car wash on property zoned BG, General Business District and located at 335 West 79th Street (West 79th Street and Great Plains Blvd.), Gary Brown. CITY 0 F PC DATE: 8/2/95 ` CIIAUAE CC DATE: 8/14/95 CASE #: 95-3 Sign By: Rask:v STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Variance request for a sign height variance to allow three eight (8) foot high entry monument signs at the intersections of Highway 41/Hazeltine Boulevard and 1- Longacres Drive, Galpin Boulevard and Hunter Drive, and Longacres Drive and Z Galpin Boulevard. QLOCATION: Meadows at Longacres, intersection of Highway 41 and Longacres Drive (existing sign); The Woods at Longacres, intersection of Galpin Blvd. and Hunter Drive (proposed sign); and future Longacres Drive and Galpin Blvd. (proposed sign). a.. APPLICANT: Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. 935 E. Wayzata Blvd. Minnesota, MN 55391 (612)473-1231 PRESENT ZONING: PUD-R, Planned Unit Development-Residential ACREAGE: Woods at Longacres, 112 acres Meadows at Longacres, 127 (net) acres • DENSITY: ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: N- PUD-R, Residential Single Family Q S- PUD-R, Residential Single Family E- RR, Residential Single Family/Vacant QW- RR, Residential Single Family/Vacant WATER AND SEWER: Available to the Site. F. PHYSICAL CHARACTER: The entry monuments are proposed to be located in the center . medians at the entrances into the subdivisions. The monuments are part of an overall entrance design consisting of stone columns, split rail fence, and landscape plantings. 2000 LAND USE PIAN: Low Density Residential 1 4 AA-4- ..,, „lem .\) ,, F-2:7.•-,. jk... t.'7,., ,, ,,.[,-Y A - m\Aic�® 44 �l�(`=�r��TJ]'/, 0 I \.../2/ /. MINNOWS/ 7A c,•r OP0o Q LUCY • ) --N REGIONAL N. IFI PARK INV- - -__ LAKE 0 al •aNARRISON , It i i i...,.••.........i..-., , r�a�-� i � ...______ LOCATION OF SIGNS � , O 1 OJv ,4�4 ; ,.,... * CO .,,....r, 7.4, * ...,, ... DRIVE t �- , I ,,,,,e rei N6,:-.111X r / •..:3 f'.� 1 1. 11111111 ;'• ik 1111Iiii_a 6 wimps •ll1111111111 _ __4, 1 / it \ HIGHWAY -- _ ,\ V 1111P 111111\israzdin,moniii TIM:ERW OD PGO'. ink CP% ANo 1I 82ND STREET �r< ..--7: - ,..• , �� Lundgren Bros. Sign Variance August 2, 1995 Page 2 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 20-1301(2), Signs Allowed in Agricultural and Residential Districts, "Area identification/entrance signs. Only one (1) monument sign may be erected on a lot, which shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet of sign display area, nor be more than five (5) feet high. Any such sign or monument shall be designed so that it is maintenance free. The adjacent property owner or a homeowners association shall be responsible for maintenance of the identification/entrance sign. Such sign shall be located so as not to conflict with traffic visibility or street maintenance operations, and shall be securely anchored to the ground. BACKGROUND On May 9, 1994, the City Council approved the final plat for the Meadows at Longacres. An entry monument was shown on the preliminary plat at the intersection of Highway 41 and Longacres Drive, however, no details on the type or size of the sign were provided at the time of plat approval. In September of the same year, the applicants erected a monument sign at the Highway 41 entrance. Staff was unaware that a permit had not been issued for this sign. On June 27, 1994, the City Council approved the final plat for the first phase of The Woods at Longacres. Once again monument signs were shown on the preliminary plat, but no sign details provided. In July of 1995, Lundgren Bros. contacted the city with regards to placing a similar monument sign at the southern Galpin Blvd. entrance. Staff informed the applicant that a sign permit would be required. The applicant submitted plans showing a monument sign approximately eight (8) feet high with a twenty-four (24) square foot display area. Staff denied the permit application as the sign did not conform to ordinance requirements. At this time, staff verified the height of the existing sign at the Highway 41 entrance and found that sign to be eight (8) feet high with a twenty-four (24) square foot display area. Staff directed the applicant to either reduce the height of the existing and proposed signs or apply for a variance. The applicants reasons or justification for the sign variance are based on aesthetics of the design. The intent was to design an entrance gate to give the user a feeling of passing through and between architectural forms and a sense of entry. The center monument was designed with the curved top to enhance and provide visual softening to the overall structure rather than placing a flat cap on the monument. (See letter from Ernst Associates dated July 24, 1995.) ANALYSIS Based on the criteria provided in the ordinance, staff is recommending denial of the variances. Neither the size, physical surrounding, shape, or topography prevents the placement of a sign which meets ordinance requirements. The applicants proceeded to construct the entry Lundgren Bros. Sign Variance August 2, 1995 Page 3 monument on Highway 41 under the assumption that the sign was approved along with the preliminary and final plat. As mentioned above, staff could find no records of sign details or any other evidence showing that the sign was approved. Generally, staff reviews signs separately through an administrative permit. Whereas, a clearly defined hardship may not be apparent, the applicants have attempted to create an entrance theme which takes into account the natural features and scale of the site, which includes approximately 225 lots. The applicants indicated in their appeal that the height variance is needed to enhance the project by providing architectural details such as an arched top, planter box, and natural stone. The entry monument, split rail fence, and stone columns create an aesthetically pleasing entrance design. The design takes into account the surrounding area by making use of appropriate scale and materials. Construction materials are durable and maintenance free and should provide a long lasting appearance. The proposed entry monument will not obstruct the view of the traveling public, increase congestion, or endanger the public safety. In addition, the sign area is twenty-four (24) square feet, which meets the minimum requirements of the sign ordinance. Should the Planning Commission recommend approval, staff has attached several conditions to ensure compliance with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. FINDINGS The Planning Commission shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. Comment: Whereas, there may not be a clearly defined hardship, the applicants wish to create a more aesthetically pleasing entrance design which takes into account the natural features and the use of appropriate scale and materials. The construction materials are durable and maintenance free and should provide a long lasting appearance. Finding: The applicant has not demonstrated a distinct hardship that would warrant the granting of a variance. Neither the size, physical surrounding, shape, or topography prevent the placement of a sign Lundgren Bros. Sign Variance August 2, 1995 Page 4 which meet ordinance requirements. The applicant would have reasonable use of the property with a five foot high sign. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this petition is based are applicable to other properties in this same zoning classification. c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The purpose of this variance does not appear to be based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the property, but rather add architectural design quality to the entrance theme. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The alleged difficulty or hardship appears to be self-created, because the applicant could have reduced the overall height of the sign while maintaining the same size area. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other lands because the sign does not obstruct the view of the traveling public, and it is setback over 100 feet from the highway. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increases the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Lundgren Bros. Sign Variance August 2, 1995 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION Whereas, there may not be a clearly defined hardship, the applicants have attempted to create an entrance theme which takes into account the surrounding area by making use of appropriate scale and materials. The applicants indicated in their appeal that the height variance is needed to enhance the project by providing architectural details such as an arched top on the monument, planter box, and natural stones. In addition, the sign meets all other ordinance requirements pertaining to sign area and design criteria. Therefore, staff has provided a motion for consideration by the Commission which recommends approval of the variance with two conditions. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council deny the variance request for a eight (8) foot high entry monument sign for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship that would warrant the granting of a variance. 2. Neither the size, physical surrounding, shape, or topography prevent the placement of a sign which meet ordinance requirements. 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship appears to be self-created, because the applicant could have reduced the overall height of the sign while maintaining the same size area. Should the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council grant the variance for the signs, staff recommends the following motion: "The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the variance request for three eight (8) foot high entry monuments as shown on the attached plans, and with the following conditions: 1. The Development Contracts shall be amended to allow signs within the public right-of- way. 2. The homeowners association shall be responsible for maintenance of the entrance monuments." ATTACHMENTS 1. Application dated July 25, 1995 2. Letter from Lundgren Bros. Construction dated July 24, 1995 Lundgren Bros. Sign Variance August 2, 1995 Page 6 3. Letter from Ernst Associates dated July 24, 1995 4. Map showing entry monuments FROM CITY OF CHANHASSEN 07. 17. 1995 13:05 P. 4 1 _ CITY OF CHANHASSEN . 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 I (612)937.1900 • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION David Hinners for APPLICANT: Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. OWNER: Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. ADDRESS: 935 East Wayzata Boulevard _ADDRESS: 935 East Wayzata Boulevard 1 Wayzalta, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 ! TELEPHONE (r)ay tine) 473-1231 TELEPHONE: 473-1231 • 1. C.)nprbttpnsive Plan Amendment 11. Vacation of ROW/Easements I : 2. Condltirn;aI Use Permit 12.Y Variance I 3. Interim U f e Permit 13. Wetland Alteration Permit " s 4. Non-cc.4rming Use Permit 14. Zoning Appeal i 5. Plar.;Sao lrlit Development 15._ Zc riling Odinance Amendment , 7. Sign Per rr,lis 8. Sign Pial Review Notlfbatlon Signs • 9. Site Plan review —1._ E Filing Fees/Attorney Cost" i ' UP/SPRNACNARME.P/Metes and Bcunds, $400 Minor SW) r 10. Sub,M‘,isiiin TOTAL FEE $ IAA'. 00 I A Its; .)f aii riroperty owners within 500 teat ci the boundartez\of the property must I tuise)d KI iR application. rryye� ,- �c,C ,k ate. 414 tot LS ..rnsa I nivv,*d`}}:Foft! d topic's of Nte pa, i t 'crest be subMitt ad. 814" X 11" r$duced copy of transparent:'for r;oii pian sheet. ' NOTE - When mur Ipfe applications are processed,the u-,oropriat�.lee shad be charged for each app!cation. " Escrow will be re.1 fired for other apH,:�atlons through tbi devalop,T,5nt crnt:act FROM CITY OF CHHNHRS£LH 07. 17. 1995 13:05 P. 5 PROJECT i.N.,41E_ l Longacres LOCATION ; Hwy 41 and Calr'in Road, Chanhassen, MN LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Meadows at Longacres and The Woods at Longacres PRESENT ZONING! R-1 REQUESTED ZONING Same PRESENT LAND U4E DESIGNATION Single Family Residential REQUESTED LAND JSE DESIGNATION Same REASON FOR THIS REQUEST Sign.Ordinance Variance Request This application rr.Js be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied ay all Information and plans required I?y applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Departrnen, to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. This Is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requlrempnts with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City show d contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached copy of proof of ownership (ether copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agree' nt), or I am the authorized person to'make this application and the fete ()Amer ilas also signed this application. 1 I will keep myseil I,1ormed of the deadlines for subrii.•i','on of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that add! lonal fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proc ed with the study. The documents and Information I have submitted are true and orrect to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Date _ ',wo (ig j ,Dr:cs Ce r sr.C.,,cT i c,A. ,,,6 Signature of Fee Ots er — Date 4ppllcatlon Receive on % L' '/ Fee Pali '�4`' Receipt No. �,-lv rho applicant sho d contact staff or a copy of tile staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. if not co:) acted, a copy of the report will u i naked t:: the applicant's address. LUf1DGREf1 BROS. CONSTRUCTION July 24, 1995 INC Ms. Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 935 E Wayzata Blvd. Re: Longacres - Entrance Monument and Sign Permit Wayzata Minnesota 55391 Dear Kate: (612)473-1231 Lundgren Bros Construction, Inc. is respectfully requesting that the City of Chanhassen grant a variance to the current sign ordinance. We believe that entrance monuments to the Longacres project are vitally important. These identifications are important to the residents of the subdivision as well as emergency vehicles and personnel. There are three planned entrances to Longacres. It is our desire that the three entrance features be identical. This creates a uniform concept and a cohesive theme. One of the entrance monuments is currently constructed on Longacres Drive at Highway 41. There will be another identical monument at the other end of Longacres Drive at Galpin Road. The third will be south at Hunter Drive and Galpin Road. The justification for the variance request is based on the aesthetics of design. All of the features from the landscaping plant selection to the placement of the features aii relate to one another. We feel that to adhere to the strict confines of the sign ordinance would negatively affect the integrity of the design. The attached letter from Gene Ernst of Ernst Associates explains the design criteria. We feel that the current sign on Longacres Drive is well designed and well constructed. It will be maintained by the Longacres Homeowners Association. It will not impair the supply of light, air or congestion on any public street. It is our desire that the City of Chanhassen allow Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. to construct two additional entrance monuments and signs to the Longacres project such as the one currently constructed. Ms. Kate Aanenson July 24, 1995 Page 2 Should there be any additional information needed, or if there are any questions, please contact me. Sincerely. LUNDGREN BROS. CONSTRUCTION, INC. AO_Af/a¢(4% David A. Hinners Ernst Associates 24 July 1995 Mr. David Hinners Lundgren Bros. Construction 935 E. Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata, MN 55391 Ref: LongAcres - Entrance Monuments Dear David: As per your request, I will try to outline the design criteria for the entrance monument. In discussing the design there has to be a certain amount of intuitive feeling that goes into the overall design of these entrances. The location of the Hwy. 41 monument required some special care and attention given to scale because of its proximity to faster moving traffic and the grade separation from Hwy. 41 down to the monuments. Distance back from the existing roadway was great, so scale and proportion became a very important part of the design. Many people driving by the monument at the present time probably are not aware that they are 7' to the bottom of the precast cap. It was important to keep this in mind to insure that we had designed a monument with good height, proportions and massiveness to visually identify this entrance. The drop in elevation from Hwy. 41 down to the monuments reduces the height and visual impact that we felt was necessary for this entrance. This required raising heights on certain elements to overcome that problem. The intent was to design an entrance gate to give the user a feeling of passing through and between architectural forms and a sense of entry. We did not feel we could achieve that experience by only enlarging the columns on each side and leaving the center island sign lower. The center monument was designed with the curved top to add some uniqueness and visual softening to the overall structure rather than placing a flat cap on the monument. The sign lettering and logo size was important because of the distance the sign had to be viewed from Hwy. 41. That in turn dictated the amount of surface area on the sign to accommodate the size of letters that have been installed. The size of those letters dictated the amount of width and height that we felt was needed to display that type of message. The type of plant material that we wanted to use in front of the sign also was part of the decision making process for the height of the sign. We didn't want the planting to cover up the logo. I feel that the sign in its present state is the correct scale and proportion for the type of entrance that we were trying to achieve. We wanted it to appear somewhat prestigious but not over pretentious in its character and its appropriateness for a rural setting. The stone LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ■ LAND PLANNING ■ 122 WEST SIXTH STREET ■ CHASKA. MINNESOTA 55318 ■ PHONE 612-448-4094 Ernst Associates Mr. David Hinners 24 July 1995 Page 2 was intentionally selected to introduce a natural stone that is typically found in the rural areas, and also to give it a substantial, durable and long lasting appearance. The split rail fence was used to provide a rustic and more natural feeling to the entrance design and experience. I think a strong theme for this project has been established with the Hwy. 41 entrance and feel it important to repeat that same concept at all main entrances to the LongAcres project. I feel this is important to carry through the continuity of design not only in materials but in form and scale for clear and easy identification as a user arrives to the site from different directions. I would hope that the city will allow the existing sign to stay and two additional signs be constructed in the same design ad size to carry through continuity on this project. Best ret ards, E• /ASSOCIATES , 9. •py Gene F. Ernst GFErb riii LI 10.1cri 111 f ft °I11- ,t 1 5 F �"li 1I L tip I•I c� � .: all' 6 --'31 '' ' 1 L2.::�1! ' +i1'�. zi.:::::::::::::;;;;;;;;::::::::::::::::„..„ ,,, ,. ,,, j. 1,..;-. .1./4\liel'..752,:f__Sti.., (....\\ .(4,;,:s ,' • ' & _ i ,i Sid...... ........ 4-4- 4''''''' 1' e. il • _ \ 17( `: 1 �il � ' � ' fiiiZ � f /i ° % I ^ f/ � --'-'szzs:,•••••"'""' • "" Z,,:,Z"-""'"‘‘.7:6:..‘‘‘,,,,,,,,,,, . L 4 trr._' '''.41.: "1 ." )11 i .. jy._. .......\.)..., e„zsi.. .. ::Y it »Ht rte./ ! .,,-,,,,y /�/ , •-Y,:. 1•N r {•'i1+.� '1,tr. ;`' ( • is,` 'll14 1 VII•1 ' �•�� ,jam%r' - • - ::g=J,' 1 ,r .:zz'zi;;;;; ii.z.:;szii; 4....„/:' t, '. IP—-*'•,'IIIPt\-r 'I.' ---1-:.'4'':-:4441. .‘i'll':'z'j'rfr—"fl...:.1 ,--4 i A- ; ..1(....b";,, • ir,) „ • :• in, kippli;itiONKtks.MP:414.110 •'..•.'-?/--"Yr ... iia,:ii.illiii... . i , ,eir:.,'..17)i' r,,,:t,. . .0i.! . ,- • , • ..) L ....N. • .• ..• . i, I/ p\-.,.-., ii-.. .1 -.... .,, ;;;,4 7,:. . 1 • 41 ..7-1 ( . \ ...•• \ - ii�'t, rw 'fir 1� 1--: ,../.• . ;. i -0 tl•N ' .. • ••••.... '"`".. -•1( „. to 1 )?. ).! ... , .(c , o .‘' .". .4. op. t A!‘..01/ • '' �. l A\. J 1\1 \%`:r • ry f !;.+.�1�. '`',.. /:i.' . 1. ,/ - CD i 1114N) •a 44 N/• � P wm J ..-. ) �c�-r Q i-4 • � q O' u .7 ' J 1 :ii:ii 1•1 lii i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGri- TI S "'- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 1 Wednesday, August 2, 1995 RErRON"` PARK •�; f tll MIf.JOf�' at 7:00 p.m. �� ' City Hall Council Chambers )1 1 ' 690 Coulter DriveIll1tc;:�i/!� ' e I Pp C 1�a Project: Sign Variance Request , %/lll _7 111PA.�..i mmnl. wAri . Warm, , Developer: Lundgren Bros. Construction ow/Mail Location: Galpin Blvd. and Hunter `Drive and Hwy. 41 and Filthy Longacres Drive 1 ‘7,•/ 2-; i -/ Notice: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a development proposed in your area. The applicant, Lundgren Bros. is requesting a sign area and height variance to allow a 33 sq. ft. x 8 ft. high entry monument sign to be located at the intersections of Galpin Blvd. and Hunter Drive and Hwy. 41 and Longacres Drive. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an over view of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The Commission will then make a recommendation to the City Council. Questions or Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact John at 937-1900, ext. 117. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 20, 1995. (ls Jay C. Dolejsi John P. Savaryn Estate Duane E. & M. Johnson 6961 Chaparral Lane d o Paul Savaryn Box 102 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1049 Oak Terrace Chaska, MN 55318 North Mankato, MN 56003 David A. Stockdale & Douglas C. & Theresa J. Bentz Darlene Turcotte Anga McBride Stockdale 7280 Galpin Blvd. 6430 City West Parkway, #5314 7210 Galpin Blvd. Excelsior, MN 55331 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Excelsior, MN 55331 Theodore F & Marlene M. Bentz J P's Links, Inc. Betty O'Shaughnessy 7300 Galpin Blvd. 7750 Galpin Blvd. 1000 Hesse Farm Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chaska, MN 55318 Charles C.S. & Irene L.Y. Song E. Jerome & Linda Carlson Dennis R. & Beverly Jacobson 7200 Galpin Blvd. 6950 Galpin Lake Road 6841 Hazeltine Blvd. Excelsior, MN 55331 Excelsior, MN 55331 Excelsior, MN 55331 Duane E & M. Johnson Robert C. & Penelope Arneson Neal K. & Deborah A. Wunderlich Box 102 6921 Galpin Blvd. 7011 Galpin Blvd. Chaska, MN 55318 Excelsior, MN 55331 Excelsior, MN 55331 Paul R. & Roxanne Youngquist Michael & C. Klingelhutz Brett A. Davidson 7105 Hazeltine Blvd. 8601 Great Plains Blvd. 7291 Galpin Blvd. Excelsior, MN 55331 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Excelsior, MN 55331 Prince R. Nelson Martin C & Beth Kuder Earl C. Gilbert III 7801 Audubon Road 6831 Galpin Blvd. 6901 Galpin Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Excelsior, MN 55331 Excelsior, MN 55331 Valetine C & Caroline Wirtz 19380 Hwy. 7 Excelsior, MN 55331 C I T Y F PC DATE: 8/2/95 \`I . CHANH1 SSEN CC DATE: 8/14/95 CASE #: 95-1 IUP �-' By: D. Hempel STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Restoration of an Existing Ravine on Bluff Creek Golf Course F z Q LOCATION: Bluff Creek Golf Course - 1025 Creekwood, Chanhassen V S1, Sec. 26, T116N, R23 11. eL APPLICANT: Bluff Creek Golf Association Q Norman Berglund - General Partner 1025 Creekwood Chaska, MN 55318 PRESENT ZONING: A-2, Agricultural Estate District ACREAGE: 193 Acres DENSITY: N/A ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: N - A-2 S - A-2 - Hesse Farm �— E - A-2 - Halla Nursery Q W - A-2 W WATER AND SEWER: N/A PHYSICAL CHARACTER: Generally rolling terrain (golf course). The southerly portion contains (n • wooded bluffs. 2000 LAND USE PLAN: Agricultural Estate a.... -- 4 ...'.c...'1 .•...4:Pm k; _jimi,:wy.-20/40,71.1. . sway Ai plit$, — - 4.‘"k IV 1 .--w. . I� 'ARK 't" s:L� `• : ��y�T—o' % ,'��I'�! ,� Nowa,ima .pis I � • Ip 1,- I 'i .��, t.1/ ��• Q��Ii1� Kzr •., :It.sr - R 1� loo— / pw- • e +t IP .qII ,iit,... �!*7 .'C _ 4, pR�_•� ,•-• IIi eall 1�....., , ` -- ILiautr ?! .. ; mu � �� 1 9100 I ; H1LL5 c5cfrotoi-pARK , m _, cc • PO BAMDMfRE V� 920C Q / '' PARR' �. / PARK 1INF \ 9300 i I �'� .r:,'h•`\, / N r couwNirr . fl'1/ 4, 9.00 1 J !� PARK ,; r �-� f -ea 9500 _ _ , '/+AI \' 9600 A T .' kJ m �`rL\ry, ii II"DGT�I 1 �1 o l 0 _. 9700 Of 9800 4:j l: rof7WkiulIiL , 't 'irf416 NOW c....,,. • Bluff Creek Golf Course Interim Use Permit Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The Bluff Creek Golf Course Association has submitted an application for an interim use permit (IUP) for the filling and stabilization of an existing ravine on Bluff Creek Golf Course. Due to the size of the ravine, this project will be ongoing for many years as clean fill becomes available. The IUP will be reviewed and renewed annually for compliance with the conditions of approval. This project will be restoring and enhancing the bluff line which has severely eroded over the past years. Staff is recommending approval of this IUP with the conditions outlined in the report. 1 ACKGROUND The golf course association has been working with the Carver County Environmental Services and City staff in a joint cooperative effort to clean up and restore a section of Bluff Creek for over the past year. This restoration effort included removal of junk cars, appliances, etc. from the ravine area. A new storm sewer has also been installed to control runoff and erosion. The applicant has acted responsibly in trying to resolve an ongoing erosion problem on their property. The applicant has incurred a great deal of time and expense in trying to improve the situation. Staff believes this proposal is an improvement to the property and will stabilize the bluff zone. Staff is proposing the permit expire on November 15, 1995. This permit is to allow the use to be permitted during the construction season. FINDINGS When approving a conditional use permit, the City must determine the capability of a proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the conditional use Section 20-232, include the following 12 items: 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. Finding: The project area will be fenced off during hours when work is not occurring. The project will be eliminating the existing dangerous conditions. 2. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. Finding: The project will enhance the bluff line by restoring the grade to match the adjacent bluffs and provide for revegetation of the bluff. Bluff Creek Golf Course Interim Use Permit Page 3 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. Finding: This project has been designed in a fashion to restore the bluff line back to its original condition and control stormwater runoff from the property. 4. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. Finding: The project will involve trucking of fill material to the site. Disruption will be minimized by controlling the hours of operation, providing dust control, and fencing the perimeter after hours. 5. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Finding: The applicant has installed a storm sewer along the ravine to manage runoff from the site and control erosion. A new bituminous street (private) has been installed by the golf course. 6. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Finding: This project was initiated by the applicant and will not require city funding or personnel/equipment. 7. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. Finding: Trucking activities will generate additional traffic through the neighborhood. Street cleaning will be required and monitored by the City. The applicant will be required to provide the City with a security escrow to ensure the streets are properly maintained. 8. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. Bluff Creek Golf Course Interim Use Permit Page 4 Finding: Trucking activities will temporarily increase traffic volumes along Creekwood. Truck turnarounds/bypasses will be required to maintain traffic flow through the neighborhood should congestion become a problem. 9. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Finding: The project will be restoring and enhancing the bluff line which has severely eroded only the past years. 10. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. Finding: The project will be restoring the bluff line and controlling erosion into Bluff Creek. 11. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. Finding: The project will maintain or improve property values by restoring the bluff line and controlling erosion. 12. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. Finding: The construction plans have been prepared in accordance with the Watershed District and City staff comments and recommendations based on engineering practices and city ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission recommends approval of Interim Use Permit #95-1 for Bluff Creek Golf Course as shown on the plans prepared by Schoell & Madson dated June 6, 1995, revised June 7, 1995 (received June 29, 1995) and subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be required to provide the City with a letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of $5,000 to guarantee maintenance of erosion control, site restoration and street cleaning. The financial guarantee shall be released upon completion of the project. Bluff Creek Golf Course Interim Use Permit Page 5 2. The applicant shall fence the top of slope area for safety purposes and to discourage/prohibit unauthorized filling after hours. 3. The site will be subject to periodic reviews by the City and inspections to ensure compliance with the conditions appropriated to ensure health, safety and restoration. 4. Hours of operation shall be 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no work on Sundays or legal holidays. 5. Erosion control measures shall be installed prior to commencement of any filling operation. Erosion control measures shall remain throughout the project until the slopes are fully revegetated and removal is authorized by the City. 6. All disturbed areas, as a result of this construction, must be restored with seed and disc-mulched, sod or wood-fiber blanket within two weeks from the completion of construction or no later than November 1, 1995. 7. All fill material to be placed in the ravine must be clean fill free of any debris. Clean fill consists of clay or granular-type soils. No organic or landscaping debris, asphalt or concrete larger than one foot in diameter will be permitted. All unsuitable material discovered must be removed by the applicant as directed by the City. 8. The applicant shall comply with the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District's permit. 9. The applicant shall daily clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the applicant, its agents or assigns. If the streets are not maintained, the City shall use the applicant's security escrow to hire outside forces to complete any necessary work. 10. This interim use permit shall be renewed on an annual basis. The permit shall expire November 15, 1995. The applicant shall contact the City to request a formal extension 45 days prior to expiration. The renewal permit shall be subject to City Council approval for renewal. 11. The applicant shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred in the enforcement of this permit including engineering and attorney's fees. 12. The applicant shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulted from permit approval or work done in conjunction with it. The applicant shall indemnify Bluff Creek Golf Course Interim Use Permit Page 6 the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages or expenses that the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys fees. 13. In the event of default by the applicant as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder the City, at its option, may perform the work and the applicant shall promptly reimburse the City for any expenses incurred by the City provided the applicant is first given notice of the work in default not less than four days in advance. This permit is a license for the City to act and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. If the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to other remedies, assess the cost in whole or part to the property owners. 14. The applicant must notify the City Engineer in writing a minimum of 48 hours prior to project commencing. 15. The site shall be graded in conformance with the approved ravine restoration plan prepared by Schoell & Madson dated June 6, 1995, revised June 7, 1995." ATTACHMENTS 1. Ravine restoration plan prepared by Schoell & Madson, dated June 6, 1995, revised June 7, 1995. 2. Public Hearing Notice. 3. Permit Application. c: Charles Folch, Director of Public Works Mr. Norman Berglund, Bluff Creek Golf Course Mr. Bob Obermeyer, RPBC Watershed District Mr. Marcus Zbinden, Carver County Environmental Services g.plan\beblu ffcr.iup CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Weice �r — " - APPLICANT: /3 fir Cr (_y►�r �S Ca d-k A- ✓1 OWNER: A}rfhvr c-'a a r7 ADDRESS: / O 2,5". Cre r k uJo o cj ADDRESS: /70,5" de h c o r Ci a- ,S7— Chaska / /VIN M/V TELEPHONE (Day time) 6/a - 47/- ?r j TELEPHONE: , 1 a - 4 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 11. Vacation of ROW/Easements 2. Conditional Use Permit 12. Variance 3. Y Interim Use Permit 13. Wetland Alteration Permit 4. Non-conforming Use Permit 14. Zoning Appeal 5. Planned Unit Development 15. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 6. Rezoning 7. Sign Permits 8. Sign Plan Review Notification Signs 9. Site Plan Review X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** $100 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP $400 Minor SUB/Metes & Bounds 00 10. Subdivision TOTAL FEE $ .3.400 7� f c.�r, :r,� �., r` � a tri ;i ;' d.. ,. A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the e _ ► rtll��it''- 1� � '._ Included with the application. tly < Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submttted. .!U .1 695 81" X 11" Reduced copy of transparency for each plan sheet. Etiu itiLEING RFT. • NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. " Escrow will hp rmniiireri for nthar annlicatinns thmunh the riavalnnmant contract FROM CITY OF CHANHASSEN 06. 29. 1995 13126 P. 3 PROJECT NAME B / vhf Creek (-4c .Course — ff -vine i es{ora1-ice LOCATION • a c e w . # • / .. . a-6-31e LEGAL DESCRIPT ON SZc -ion ,9.6 — 7-Pu P //to / ,1q e a 3 /9F,3e. he rer. �',�.,.°.AC 14 E \la seal �4-� ire , c i.i �S'. !4- ExC % F �3a f1-C o iii/.6 /¢ sE kit- _ E d 19ods a E .c.E, 1/1- sFYl- 3 --.Ar, i. c, Cre}f / Jin dofF4--d PRESENT ZONING REQUESTED ZO INO I)0 C`Ja ni f PRESENT LAND SE DESIGNATION REQUESTED LAisiD USE DESIGNATION j1/0 C 4‘)n 9 e REASON FOR THiS REQUEST T Ye s-i-o r e a- s vc r ly P v o cI e (-Iy v I Ai/ I / This application m st be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be a000mpanied by all Information and plans require. by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Departm=nt to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. This Is to certify th-t I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City require ents with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City s • id contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either spy of Owners Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person o make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself nformed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that a••Itional fees may be charged for oonsufing fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to pr•coed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. i also understand t at atter the approval or granting of the permit, such permits shall be Invalid unless they are recorded against the title to the property for which the approval/permit is granted within 120 days with the Carver County Recorder's Office and the original document returned to City Hall Records. 61Uff Creek (o)B 0C1.)-11017 /P //[.:WWd •/a`ire ik. Z—, `1 —?N S .naureofAppli• .nt 6;e (. K.j P>el-pie r, Date _ e4/,,,L..„,..,„ ..t.. I.r... , G X30-471/43- •nature of Fee a ner 4 Gerlervi 4,ri-oe►r Date p 0 Application Recel d on (400r- Fee Paid yt Receipt No.__, i The applicant shLuld contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. If not +ntacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's addross. • 101 nnt��i'n7 Bluff ^ nnn^n tot CREEk (' Golf ASSOCIATION wail Co 14 6iut1 Creek OFFICE: 464 SECOND ST. • EXCELSIOR. MINN. 55331 • PHONE 612/474-5428 i.1 v COURSE:LOCATED ON HIWAY 101 - 3.3 MILES SO.OF CHANHASSEN•445-5685 169 CIF antillASSEN June 27, 1995 City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive JUN 2 '3 i995 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: Mr. David Hemple Dear Sir: In accordance with Chanhassen City Code Sec. 7.35 "Applications for Earth Work Permits: we herewith submit 24 copies of Schoell & Madsen's drawing SMI project ND 60490-003, sheet 1 of 1 , outlining the fill area and design. Sec 7.35 paragraph 5 "Purpose of the operation". The ravine in question is a large ravine, bounded on each side by almost vertical clay banks. These clay banks have a lens of sandy soil approximately 20' to 30' from the top of the bank. The sandy soil becomes saturated by ground water and flows to the gully. This loss of support causes the vertical clay banks to slough off, which results in an ever increasing gully. The tops of the banks are covered with oak and maple trees of significant size. We wish, over a long period of time, to fill the ravine and stop the loss of the large trees and to improve the appearance of the ravine and retain the large, attractive trees. Sec. 7.35 paragraphs 6, 7, 11 , 14 7.35 para. 6 The entire operation will take years (assuming annual renewal of the permit). We will take fill as it becomes available. 7.35 para. 7 We will take fill as it becomes available, which could be any time of the year during normal working hours. 7.35 para. 11 Trucks would enter via Creekwood Road from Highway #101 , Chanhassen, MN. fol ^nf-n ori i' — 5 \ / BLufffof CREEK GOLF ASSOCIATION ti / co `°- BIu11 Geek OFFICE 464 SECOND ST. • EXCELSIOR, MINN. 55331 • PHONE 612/474-5428 1.2 COURSE.LOCATED ON HIWAY 101 - 3.3 MILES SO.OF CHANHASSEN•445-5685 169 City of Chanhassen June 27, 1995 Page Two 7.35 para. 14 We intend to follow Schoell & Madsen's plan and monitor the quality and quantity of the fill. Any complaints will be addressed by meeting the complainant and working out an agreement. Please contact Norm Berglund, 471-8981 if there are any questions or problems. Very truly yours, 7;724'x-,9-/A - , I Norman T. Berglund Bluff Creek Golf Assn. W.:iv/ I ! : . LW[ - � �KP IIIWrildr41 r144610 I III NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING oQ04' j 1.3t' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Qe • Wednesday, August 2, 1995 at 7:00 p. p.m. *IP PRO E LOCATION 7' City Hall Council Chambers , ,..,. ° -. BLUFF£ 690 Coulter Drive - - - ak — .M- ji .: .:r" Project: Interim Use Permit �-: .: - ;r - I , if 'to 116 I` C° ilk Developer. Bluff Creek Golf Course I R W_e� Location: Ravine on Bluff Creek Golf (.)' Course e Q., ^ i \ \ ---- oQOE 113 GLp00 Notice: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a development proposed in your area. The applicant is the Bluff Creek Golf Couse requesting an Interim Use Permit for the filling and stabilization of an existing ravine on Bluff Creek Golf Course. Due to the size of the ravine, this project will be ongoing as clean fill becomes available. The interim use permit will be reviewed annually. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an over view of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The Commission will then make a recommendation to the City Council. Questions or Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact David at 937-1900, ext. 123. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 20, 1995/05 l S iseph & LaVerne Lynch Dale & Peggy Gunderson Ann & Clara Vogel 2.5 Creekwood 845 Creekwood 815 Creekwood haska, MN 55318 Chaska, MN 55318 Chaska, MN 55318 ?encer Boynton Mark Halla 77 Creekwood 770 Creekwood haska, MN 55318 Chaska, MN 55318 CITY O F PC DATE: August 2, 1995 \,.-1 CUANIIASSEI CC DATE: August 28, 1995 CASE #: Site Plan #95-11 By: Generous:v STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Site plan review for a 9,161 square foot office/warehouse (1,802 sq. ft. office and 7,359 sq. ft. warehouse) F- LOCATION: Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen Business Center 2nd Addition a V APPLICANT: Highland Development, Inc. 2060 Majestic Way Chanhassen, MN 55317 (612) 470-8901 PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development, PUD ACREAGE: 1.57 acres (68,250 sq. ft.) ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: N - IOP, railroad, vacant S - PUD, National Weather Service E - PUD, vacant lot, Jehovah Witness, Power System W - PUD, open space/pond area Q I, WATER AND SEWER: Available to site. PHYSICAL CHARACTER: The site is being prepared for development as part of the W Chanhassen Business Center 2nd Addition. There are no significant environmental features on this lot. Vacant office/industrial lots abut the property to the east and south. The (f) • lot abuts a public right-of-way on Commerce Drive. 2000 LAND USE PLAN: Office/Industrial w , _.JJ •` t.aiSt ANN 1111111 011111111111r `4 z�11111111h" `*4 416 FrArf •wilv �L 1.1= 1 it 1.1 �; 14KB ,116 ' K I � rig:NNPA —- - STA "' Y � _ . 0.•• E V4'. 3 F IV � ;/ � a I 0 OS, `J`(/ ih,_......„,„-........„.7.,0*„._.,irelliFF,4, . 1‘ 414S4 _AV 2241 MEET 1".° 411," 4, fir. / -"ii a . , , , ..i . g 111 IP' , i ' .. __ _ .1: \� ( azt lion_vaigjoi ....„. Alf Aii � 4��c.L' a l ."i• AftsAIt A• / ;��o��!iiii��i'�t�j, (CB 181 - .,,�/ PARK /1111 411.n,.4,_ ��Ij��i'. LYMAN BLVD A�(�7 CO Is , ci�i.Yi IC .. 4A� 8700—I -ARK �'SE,,,,,J 1�'�.�. v4. •,., 7 ♦ 41��I ,„„e,„. $ o `o 0 0 °o / e �iGil y I �� SII♦ �CII IfiV ^ % N 8800— / �� Bi1�� I _1 a4�Yt, 4, min N.N 8300 //I • T E airo _ WI e. '«° 9000 LY o IA J 0 ' i .T Y OF CI. 9100 = 1 1 1SSEN920C —_, MAP 9 300 l8c4 ` / \ 9400 � 1_ _ ( , ,•,� / 9500 1 ' - / _ ti 7— 9600 ; 4 • 0 L. 9700 / % r^ 9800 - - - ir.-l /. C /: I, 9900 Q+ 1 . 4 10000— / 1111111k. 1010✓ 10200 Pr- ¢ - ,' -_ 'NGINEERING DEPT. �' . 10300 ...:.< I '-_-4p. ED JAN, 1995 ` 10400— % i 0500 1 ,r 1 1 Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing a 9,161 square foot office warehouse building on Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen Business Center 2nd Addition. The warehouse is approximately 201/2 feet in height. The office portion of the building is 12 feet in height. There is potential future expansion area for the building on the north and south sides of the proposed structure. The applicant is proposing the use of unpainted tilt-up random ribbed concrete panels for the warehouse portion of the building and a dry-vit (textured finishing system). The PUD requires that all walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. Staff is concerned that the applicant does not provide sufficient architectural interest within the warehouse component of this development and recommends that additional architectural detail be provided on the northeast and northwest elevations. Examples of such detail are the use of glazed tiles, projection of concrete panels to add relief, incorporation of smooth areas or bands within the facade, geometric patterns, etc. The southwest elevation of the building can be relieved through the use of landscaping. Additional landscaping needs to be provided north of the building to provide screening from the residential development to the northwest. Staff believes that the proposed development meets the standards established as part of the PUD and is recommending approval of the site plan subject to the conditions contained in this report. BACKGROUND On January 13, 1992, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for the Chanhassen Business Center as shown on the attached site plan. The PUD was amended on February 8, 1993 to allow for a church as a permitted use and the final plat for phase I of the project was approved. On April 24, 1995, the Chanhassen Business Center 2nd Addition, subdividing Outlot C into 7 lots, was approved by the City. The Chanhassen Business Center is an industrial/office park on 93.7 acres. The original plat consisted of 12 lots and 2 outlots. The ultimate development for this proposal was to have a total of 700,000 square feet of building area with a mix of 20% office, 25% industrial and 55% warehouse. The first phase of final plat approval included two lots. The National Weather Service (NWS) was built on Lot 1, Block 2 and the Jehovah Witness Church was built on Lot 1, Block 1 of the 1st Addition. Power Systems was built on Lot 4, Block 1 and Paulstarr Enterprises was built on Lot 7, Block 1 of the 2nd Addition. One of the original conditions of the PUD was that the perimeter landscaping was to be installed as well as the trail. Due to the extensive costs of grading and utility extension, the developers sought relief from this requirement. When the first two uses were approved, the perimeter landscaping was required for these two uses only. The Jehovah Witness Church has completed their Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 3 perimeter landscaping. The NWS building has posted surety for the completion of perimeter landscaping this spring. Staff added a condition on the 2nd Addition plat that all required perimeter landscaping be completed with this phase. This landscaping will be consistent with the approved landscaping plan for the original PUD. GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The development standards will remain the same as previously approved with the PUD. a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD light industrial/office park. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each lot proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to light industrial, warehousing, and office as defined below. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the City Council shall make that interpretation. 1. Light Industrial. The manufacturing, compounding, processing, assembling, packaging, or testing of goods or equipment or research activities entirely within an enclosed structure, with no outside storage. There shall be negligible impact upon the surrounding environment by noise, vibration, smoke, dust or pollutants. 2. Warehousing. Means the commercial storage of merchandise and personal property. 3. Office. Professional and business office, non-retail activity. FINDING: The proposed uses of light industrial and office are consistent with the parameters established as part of the PUD. c. Setbacks In the PUD standards, there is the requirement for landscape buffering in addition to building and parking setbacks. The landscape buffer on Audubon Road is 50 feet, south of Lake Drive Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 4 and 100 feet along the southern property line. The PUD zone requires a building to be setback 50 feet from the required landscape buffer and public right-of-ways. There is no minimum requirement for setbacks on interior lot lines. The following setbacks shall apply from the right-of-way: Building Parking Required (interior road system) 25' 15' Provided Commerce Drive 110' 20' FINDING: The proposed development meets or exceeds the minimum setbacks established as part of the PUD. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Chanhassen Business Center Second Addition CBC Lot Size - Bldg Bldg Sq. Building Coverage Impervious PUD Acres Ht. (ft.) Ft. Surface Proposed 1.55 40' 17,000 26% 65% Lot 2 Highland 1.57 20' 8" 9,161 13.4% 37 % Develop., Lot 2 The PUD standard for hard surface coverage is 70% for office and industrial uses. Parking Standards: Office - 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet; Warehouse - 1 space per 1,000 for first 10,000 square feet, then 1 space per 2,000 square feet. Staff has estimated the required parking at 16 spaces. The applicant has provided 24 spaces. Building Square Footage Breakdown for entire development Office 20% 120,700 sq. ft. Manufacturing 25% 150,875 sq. ft. Warehouse 54.09% 326,425 sq. ft. Church 0.91% 5,500 sq. ft. Total 100% 603,500 sq. ft. Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 5 FINDING: The proposed development meets the development standards established as part of the PUD. The city has previously approved the following square footages within the Chanhassen Business Center: church - 5,500 square feet; office - 32,219.5 square feet (National Weather Service, Power Systems, and Paulstarr Enterprises); and warehouse - 38,333.5 square feet (Power Systems and Paulstarr Enterprises). e. Building Materials and Design 1. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 2. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Masonry material shall be used. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted block. 3. Brick may be used and must be approved to assure uniformity. 4. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. 5. Concrete may be poured in place, tilt-up or pre-cast, and shall be finished in stone, textured or coated. 6. Metal siding will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials or curtain wall on office components or, as trim or as HVAC screen. 7. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 8. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. 9. The use of large unadorned, prestressed concrete panels and concrete block shall be prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. 10. Space for recycling shall be provided in the interior of all principal structures for all developments in the Business Center. FINDING: The applicant is proposing the use of unpainted tilt-up random ribbed concrete panels for the warehouse portion of the building and a dry-vit (textured finishing system). The PUD requires that all walls shall be given added architectural interest through building Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 6 design or appropriate landscaping. Staff is concerned that the applicant does not provide sufficient architectural interest within the warehouse component of this development and recommends that additional architectural detail be provided on the northeast and northwest elevations. Examples of such detail are the use of glazed tiles, projection of concrete panels to add relief, incorporation of smooth areas or bands within the facade, geometric patterns, etc. The southwest elevation of the building can be relieved through the use of landscaping. f. Site Landscaping and Screening 1. All buffer landscaping, including boulevard landscaping, included in Phase I area to be installed when the grading of the phase is completed. This may well result in landscaping being required ahead of individual site plan approvals but we believe the buffer yard and plantings, in particular, need to be established immediately. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 2. All open spaces and non-parking lot surfaces shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 3. Storage of material outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan review. All approved outdoor storage must be screened with masonry fences and/or landscaping. 3. The master landscape plan for the CBC PUD shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments. Each lot must present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan review process. 4. Undulating or angular berms 3' to 4' in height, south of Lake Drive along Audubon Road shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of Phase I grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed incrementally, but it shall be required where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. FINDING: The landscaping plan needs to be revised to provide building relief and additional screening. Specifically, six deciduous trees, 25 feet on center, shall be planted on the southwest side of the building beginning at the northwest corner of the warehouse. A landscape screen consisting of a mix of between five and seven evergreens and deciduous trees shall be incorporated in a triangular shaped area, with a minimum of 60 foot sides, Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 7 located in the northwest corner of the property south of the NSP easement. Additional evergreens shall also be provided on the east property line, north of the driveway to screen the loading area. g. Signage 1. All freestanding signs be limited to monument signs. The sign shall not exceed eighty (80) square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight (8) feet in height. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect with the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material throughout the development. The applicant should submit a sign package for staff review. 2. Each property shall be allowed one monument sign located near the driveway into the private site. All signs require a separate permit. 3. The signage will have consistency throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. 4. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. FINDING: The applicant has not provided details regarding signage for the site. h. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the business center should be consistent throughout the development. 2. A decorative, shoe box fixture (high pressure sodium vapor lamps) with a square ornamental pole shall be used throughout the development area for area lighting. 3 Lighting equipment similar to what is mounted in the public street right-of-ways shall be used in the private areas. 4. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. FINDING: The applicant has not provided lighting details or calculations for this development. However, city ordinance and the PUD standards provide sufficient control to assure compliance to an established standard. Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 8 GRADING The entire site will be graded in conjunction with the Chanhassen Business Center 2nd Addition. Only minor site grading for the parking lot will be necessary in conjunction with this site plan. DRAINAGE Storm sewer is proposed to convey surface water runoff from the parking lot area into the existing storm sewer. Staff requests that detailed stormwater calculations for a 10-year storm event will be supplied prior to issuance of a building permit. The landscape plan proposes planting trees along the storm sewer line on the east property line. The trees should be placed in a fashion so that they are not directly over the storm sewer. In addition, the applicant should enter into an encroachment agreement with the City for these planting materials that fall within the City's drainage and utility easement. UTILITIES Sewer and water service is being extended to the site in conjunction with the Chanhassen Business Center 2nd Addition improvement project. MISCELLANEOUS. Erosion control measures are proposed around the perimeter of the site. Staff also recommends that a rock filter construction entrance be used and maintained until the parking lot has been paved with an all-weather surface. In addition, the catch basins shall be protected with hay bales and/or silt fence until the parking lot has been paved. LANDSCAPING The landscaping plan needs to be revised to provide building relief and additional screening. Specifically, six deciduous trees, 25 feet on center, shall be planted on the southwest side of the building beginning at the northwest corner of the warehouse. A landscape screen consisting of a mix of between five and seven evergreens and deciduous trees shall be incorporated in a triangular shaped area, with a minimum of 60 foot sides, located in the northwest corner of the property south of the NSP easement. Additional evergreens shall also be provided on the east property line, north of the driveway to screen the loading area. LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The applicant has not provided lighting details or calculations for this development. However, city ordinance and the PUD standards provide sufficient control to assure Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 9 compliance to an established standard. The applicant has not provided signage details for the project. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 10 (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, the design guidelines established as part of the Chanhassen Business Center PUD with the modifications outlined in the staff report, and the site plan review requirements. The site has few existing natural amenities due to previous development in the area. The site design is compatible and harmonious with the approved industrial developments throughout the city. Neighboring properties will be protected through the incorporation of the revisions to the development contained in this staff report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Site Plan 95-11 for Highland Development, plans dated 6/19/95 prepared by Bernard Herman Architects, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. Fire Marshal conditions: a. Submit technical data to Fire Marshal which spells out processes, product commodity manufactured and warehoused. This is used to determine fire sprinkler design density. b. Add one fire hydrant on the east corner of the building. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location. c. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #04-1991. Copy enclosed. "Notes on site plan." d. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #07-1991 - "Pre-Fire Plan." Copy enclosed. e. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #29-1992, - "Premise Identification." Copy enclosed. f. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #36-1994 - "Combination Fire Sprinkler/Domestic Supply Pipe." Copy enclosed. Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 11 g. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #40-1995 - "Fire Sprinkler Systems." Copy enclosed. 2. The applicant shall supply the City with detailed stormwater runoff calculation for a 10-year storm event. 3. The applicant shall enter into an encroachment agreement for the landscape plantings within the utility and drainage easement along the east property line prior to issuance of a building permit. No landscape plantings shall be placed over the city's utility lines. 4. The plans shall include a rock filter construction entrance as well as the catch basins being protected with hay bales or silt fence until the parking lot has been paved with an all-weather surface. 5. The applicant shall enter into a site development contract with the city and provide the necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of approval. 6. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. As an alternative, the applicant can use factory applied panels on the exterior to the equipment that would blend in with the building materials. 7. All freestanding signs shall be limited to monument signs. The sign shall not exceed eighty (80) square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight (8) feet in height. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect with the quality of the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. Each property shall be allowed one monument sign located near the driveway into the private site. The monument sign must maintain a ten foot setback from the property line. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material throughout the development. The applicant should submit a sign package for staff review. A separate permit is required for all signage on site. 8. Lighting for the interior of the business center should be consistent throughout the development. A decorative, shoe box fixture (high pressure sodium vapor lamps) with a square ornamental pole shall be used throughout the development area for area lighting. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than ' foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Lighting equipment similar to what is mounted in the public street right-of-ways shall be used in the private areas. Highland Development, Site Plan 95-11 August 2, 1995 Page 12 9. Additional architectural detail shall be provided on the northeast and northwest elevations. Examples of such detail are the use of glazed tiles, projection of concrete panels to add relief, incorporation of smooth areas or bands within the facade, geometric patterns, etc. 10. The landscaping plan shall be revised to provide building relief and additional screening. Specifically, six deciduous trees, 25 feet on center, shall be planted on the southwest side of the building beginning at the northwest corner of the warehouse. A landscape screen consisting of a mix of between five and seven evergreens and deciduous trees shall be incorporated in a triangular shaped area with a minimum of 60 foot sides located in the northwest corner of the property south of the NSP easement. Additional evergreens shall also be provided on the east property line, north of the driveway to screen the loading area." ATTACHMENTS 1. Development Review Application 2. Reduced site plan 3. Reduced landscaping plan 4. Memo from Mark Littfin to Robert Generous dated June 27, 1995 5. Letter from Bernard Herman to Bob Generous dated June 29, 1995 6. Chanhassen Business Center Preliminary Plans 7. Tree Guide, from A Guide to Field Identification: Trees of North Am�rira, C. Frank Brockman, Western Publishing Company, Inc., 1986 8. Preliminary Landscape and Grading Plan for Chanhassen Business Center 9. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List 86/14/95 14:41 :36 612-937-5739-> 6125451254 Page 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY OF CHANHASSEN • RECEIVED 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 JUN 19 1995 (012) 937.1800 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT APPLICANT_ Highland Development Inc. OWNER., Highland Development Inc. 2060 Majestic Way 2060 Majestic Way ADDRESS; ADDRESS: Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 TELEPHONE(Day time) 470-8901 TELEPHONE: 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 11. Vacation of ROW/Easements I.•r� 1 E. Cdndltionai Use Permit 12. Variance 8.! CHIding/EXcavatlon Permit 13. Wetland Alteration Permit 4.- lrft6rlm Use Permit 14. Zoning Appeal 5. Planned Unit Development 15. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 8. Ra'toning 7. 84n Permits 8.x 814n Plan Review Notification Signs O.: sftle Plan Review Esorow for Filing Fees/Attomey Cost" $100 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP $400 Minor SUB/Metes & Bounds 10. SUbdivisIon TOTAL FEE $ 5-91 . 56'-. A flet Of all property owners within 600 feel of the boundaries of the property must Inolut id with the application. Twontyelx full alio folded copies of the plans must be submitted. 814" X11" Reduced Dopy of transparency for each plan sheet. • NOTE • When muttlple applications are processed, the appropriate tee shall,be charged for each application. " Escrow will be required for other applications throuoh the devAlOnmant MnfroM /14/95 14 :42:11 612-937-5739-> 6125451254 Page 3 `f OJECT NAME Highland Development Inc. C CATION Chanhassen, MN EaAL DESDRIPTION Lot 2, Block 1 . Chanhassen Business Center 2nd addition. RESENT ZONING 10P EOUESTED ZONING 10P RESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION of f i re:./warehotis.g '_QUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION office/warehouse EASON FOR THIS REQUEST tis application must be completed In full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information rd plans reqUIred by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the arming Depgrtment to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. uis Is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying tib all City re ulrements with regard to this request. This application should be processed In my name and I am the party )dm the Cit should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of 'riership (eh er copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Tale or purchase agreement), or I am the thorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. 'til keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further erstand thtt addltldnal fees may be charged for consuhing fees, feas'iblthy studies, etc, whh an estimate prior to any thorizatlon 1110 proceed whh the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best thy knowiet{Qe, iso understand that after the approval or granting of the perm't, ouch permhs shall be invalid unless they are recorded alnat the title to the property for which the approvalipermh Is granted within 120 days with the Carver County Recorder's 'Ice and the orlglnai document returned to City Hail Records, Irtiature of Applicant Date nature of Fee Owner Date )lication Received on &//Rq7 tree Paid //•• �� Receipt No.15'5 46— / 1 applicant should contact staff for a copy of the etetf report which will be evaitable on Friday prior to the otind. If nbt contacted, a copy of tho report will be mailed to the applicant's eddress. r na....t�wwwo�N •� ""' 1 I2 r �_ =, - NMt a - -r"7::-..1_:::" L��_ == ,1na4dO A3a wv1 EI1 i LIU IP rpopPV,,,,piti 1 ti.: y1 let : ;.1,... Z O 1 " diii Isii =a :._ilii X la ...tor :.„ ,,A• •-0111 !! I ii I i Li li I it 44 0 :II iiiiitlY111111111 III 11.1/1/ 2 O . 6 AL Millem ill! hilt 1 Mir dilliiiill . I I I I I I J I I = I V-- 5 1.1 .4-- W 4r 1, 1 fi I V I I (r/I/.. I iot . i 1 0 r I • td' I I L 1- t- c — —.......1.--=" •s-•'u.r.wa.r�.n�s t•n IN Imo �– .' SNI 51�31JH id I r — .....r JN 1N3^JdOT3A�WYl E* Nd 3-I O�lSIIJFl39 d J 11EMSt18fl8H8II©hII EII©IUul . ii . ) �Ebi liIs1a 111 1 �.� r ,r; iliIII 1 , ,;:.,,or -A-3 .1 -a' El ICICHEMIXIIII — ‘, 1 1 Y rrMM _____ci I i � .a i i • ea ___c jdo p. s I Z! , t a 7.a L. JT- r ,a. n °s 'fir 1 - ' , .. '` .lam y CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Generous, Planner II FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal DATE: June 27, 1995 SUBJ: Site Plan Review of a 9,161 square foot Office Warehouse, Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen Business Center 2nd Addition Planning Case 95-11 Site Plan I have reviewed the site plan in order to comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, and have the following fire code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The site plan review was based on the available information submitted at this time. As additional plans or changes are submitted, the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. 1. Submit technical data to Fire Marshal which spells out processes, product commodity manufactured and warehoused. This is used to determine fire sprinkler design density. 2. Add one fire hydrant on the east corner of the building. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location. 3. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #04-1991. Copy enclosed. "Notes on site plan." 4. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #07-1991 - "Pre-Fire Plan". Copy enclosed. 5. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #29-1992, - "Premise Identification". Copy enclosed. 6. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #36-1994 - "Combination Fire Sprinkler/Domestic Supply Pipe". Copy enclosed. 7. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #40-1995 - "Fire Sprinkler Systems". Copy enclosed. g:\safely\ml\95.11 a CITY OF i CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 ,`; (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES TO BE INCLUDED ON ALL SITE PLANS 1. Fire Marshal must witness the flushing of underground sprinkler service line, per NFPA 13-8-2.1. 2. A final inspection by the Fire Marshal before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 3. Fire Department access roads shall be provided on site during all phases of construction. The construction of these temporary roads will conform with the Chanhassen Fire Department requirements for temporary access roads at construction sites. Details are available. 4. Onsite fire hydrants shall be provided and in operating condition during all phases of construction. 5. The use of liquefied petroleum gas shall be in conformance with NFPA Standard 58 and the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. A list of these requirements is available. (See policy #33-1993) 6. All fire detection and fire suppression systems shall be monitored by an approved UL central station with a UL 71 Certificate issued on these systems before final occupancy is issued. 7. An 11" x 14" As Built shall be provided to the Fire Department. The As Built shall be reproducible and acceptable to the Fire Marshal. (See policy #07-1991). 8. An approved lock box shall be provided on the building for fire department use. The lock box should be located by the Fire Department connection or as located by the Fire Marshal. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991 Date: 11/22/91 Revised: 12/23/94 Page 1 of 2 9. High-piled combustible storage shall comply with the requirements of Article #81 of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. High-piled combustible storage is combustible materials on closely packed piles more than 15' in height or combustible materials on pallets or in racks more than 12' in height. For certain special-hazard commodities such as rubber tires, plastics, some flammable liquids, idle pallets, etc. the critical pile height may be as low as 6 feet. 10. Fire lane signage shall be provided as required by the Fire Marshal. (See policy #06-1991). 11. Smoke detectors installed in lieu of 1 hour rated corridors under UBC section 3305G, Exception#5 shall comply with Chanhassen Fire Department requirements for installation and system type. (See policy #05-1991). 12. Maximum allowed size of domestic water service on a combination domestic/fire sprinkler supply line policy must be followed. (See policy #36-1994). Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991 Date: 11/22/91 , Revised: 12/23/94 Approved - Public Safety Director Page 2 of 2 CITY OF i CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY REGARDING PRE-PLAN Prior to issuing the C .O. , a pre-plan, site plan shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval . The following items shall be shown on the plan. 1) Size 11" x 17 " (maximum) 2) Building footprint and building dimensions 3 ) Fire lanes and width of fire lanes 4) Water mains and their sizes, indicate looped or dead end 5) Fire hydrant locations 6) P. I .V. - Fire Department connection 7) Gas meter (shut-off) , NSP (shut off) 8) Lock box location 9) Fire walls, if applicable 10) Roof vents, if applicable 11) Interior walls 12) Exterior doors 13 ) Location of fire alarm panel 14) Sprinkler riser location 15) Exterior L . P. storage, if applicable 16) Haz . Mat . storage, if applicable 17) Underground storage tanks locations, if applicable 18) Type of construction walls/roof 19 ) Standpipes PLEASE NOTE: Plans with topographical information, contour lines, easement lines, property lines, setbacks, right-of-way lines, headings, and other related lines or markings, are not acceptable, and will be rejected. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention _ Policy #07-1991 Date: 01/16/91 / j� Revised: 02/18/94 Approved - Public Safety Director Page 1 of 1 - p.,,,. CliraiNNASsEN,, ,,,,„i .t. CITY OF -..„. ,,.li ' ;., „.,- , ,..;_,„.„...., .;,...:.,..„, -1, „ ....--7 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 � '-. (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 ql CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY PREMISES IDENTIFICATION General Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall be approved by one of the following - Public Safety Director, Building Official, Building Inspector, Fire Marshal . Requirements are for new construction and existing buildings where no address numbers are posted. °i Tr Other R.ilrements-General 1. Numbers shall be a contrasting color from'the background. 2. Numbers shall not be In script 3. If a structure is not visible from the street,additional numbers are required at the driveway entrance. Size and location must be approved. 4. Numbers on mall box at driveway entrance may be a minimum of 4". However, requirement #3 must still be met. 5. Administrative authority may require additional numbers If deemed necessary, Residen-ttal Requirements(2 or less dwelling unit) 1. Minimum height shall be 5 114". 2. Building permits will not be finaled unless numbers are posted and approved by the Building Department Commercial Reqrirements 1. Minimum height shall be 12". 2. Strip Malls a. Multi tenant building will have minimum height requirements of 6". b. Address numbers shall be on the main entrance and on all back doors. 3. If address numbers are located on a directory entry sign, additional numbers will be required on the buildings main entrance. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #29-1992 A - / Date: 06/15/92 Revised: Approved - Public Safty Director Page 1 of 1 ta 1«r� PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF 1,4 C HAN' HASSEN ,\ 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROTECTIVE INSPECTION DIVISION POLICY MAXIMUM ALLOWED SIZE OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ON A COMBINATION DOMESTIC/FIRE SPRINKLER SUPPLY LINE 1. Domestic water line shall not be greater than 1/4 pipe size of the combination service water supply line. 2. 1 1/2" domestic off 6" line 3. 2" domestic off 8" line 4. 2 1/2 domestic off 10" line Option 1: Domestic sizes may be increased if it can be calculated hydraulically that the demand by all domestic fixtures will not drop the fire sprinkler water below its minimum gallonage required. Option 2: Combination domestic and five line service shall have an electric solenoid valve installed on the domestic side of the service. This valve shall be normally powered open and close on loss of electric power or signal from the system water flow indicator. Must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Mechanical Inspector. Chanhassen Fire Department Water Line Sizing / Policy #36-1994 Date: 06/10/94 _ i i% Revised: Approved - Pi olio Safety Director Page 1 of 1 CITY QF CHANHASSEN \ reff 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 1. Permits are required for all sprinkler work. 2. A minimum of four sets of plans are required. Send, or drop off plans and specifications and calculations to: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 3. Yard post indicators are required and must have tamper protection. 4. All control values must be provided with tamper protection. 5. All systems tests must be witnessed by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal. Appointments can be made by calling the Fire Marshal at 937-1900, ext. 132, between 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Please try to arrange tests at least 24 hours in advance. All revisions of 25 heads or more will require a test. 6. Main drains & inspector test connections must be piped to the outside atmosphere. 7. Water may j be introduced into sprinkler piping from the City main until the Fire Marshal witnesses a flush test per NFPA 13-8-2.1. 8. The City of Chanhassen has adopted Appendix E (see 1305.6905 appendix chapter 38 of the MBC). Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Policy #40-1995 Date: 01/12/95 Revised: 04/26/95 Page 1 of 2 9. All systems must be designed to NFPA-13, 1991 edition and Chapter 6 Standards. All attic systems are to be spaced at a maximum 130 square foot coverage. 3/4" plastic piping will nat be allowed at any time in attic space. 10. All equipment installed in a fire protection sy stem shall be UL listed or factory mutual approved for fire protection service. 11. Fire protection systems that are hydraulically calculated shall have a 5 psi safety factor at maximum system flow. 12. Acceptable water supplies for fire sprinkler systems are listed in NFPA-13, 1991 ed., Chapter 7. Swimming pools and ponds are not acceptable primary water supplies. 13. Pressure and gravity tanks shall be sized per the requirements contained in NFPA-13 and 22. Duration of the water supply shall match the hazard classification of the occupancy. 14. Include spec sheets for fire sprinkler heads - dry pipe/pre-action valving. 15. The definition of inspection is contained in MN Rule 7512.0100 Subpart 10, and states that inspection means: 1. Conducting a final acceptance test. 2. Trip test of dry pipe, deluge or preaction valves. 3. A test that an authority having jurisdiction requires to be conducted under the supervision of a contractor. Only licensed fire protection contractors are permitted to conduct these tests. 4. All other inspections including the inspectors test, main drain and other valves are permitted under MN Rule 7512.0400 Subpart-2G, as maintenance activities and do not require a license as a fire protection contractor. 16. Per Section 904.3.2. and the 1994 Uniform Building Code, an approved audible sprinkler flow alarm to alert the occupants shall be provided in the interior of the building in a normally occupied location. (Location must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal). Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Policy #40-1995 Date: 01/12/95 Revised: 04/26/95 Approved-Public Safety Director Page: 2 of 2 GM\ BERNARD HERMAN ARCHITECTS, INC. GN_ June 29, 1995 REC�:1VED City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Dr. _!(! Chanhassen. MN 55317 �'n5 '� LiTV O- -., Attn: Mr. Bob Generous Re: Highland Development Building Dear Bob: As we discussed on the telephone, there are several informational items that should be noted on the drawings previously submitted for this project. They are as follows: Sheet Al - Add a dashed line on the south side of the Office building (front) with a note "future office expansion". - Add a dashed line on the north side of the Warehouse (rear) with a note "future warehouse expansion". Sheet A2 - The mezzanine will be expanded over the Assembly Area for an additional 840 s.f. The Assembly Area will be enclosed with block walls on the north and east sides. - Add double doors on the exterior north wall, 10' west of the building corner. Sheet A3 - Delete reference to painted pre-cast concrete walls of the Warehouse. Painting of the pre-cast panels will be deleted. Sheet L1 - Add a note that the two boulevard trees shown adjacent to the entry drive access to the site, Type D and C, shall be furnished by the Developer. 4825 Olson Memorial Highway.Suite 230 Minneapolis.Minnesota 55422 612-545-1253 June 29, 1995 Mr. Bob Generous Page 2 - Add two coniferous trees in the side yard setback area at the east property line for additional screening. These trees would be located in the spaces between the first tree Type B trees. If you have any questions or require additional information, lease call. Sincerely, BERNARD H AN ARCHITECTS, INC. / . .1 e 4 �A :e nerd He .n, AIA BH:crk cc: Benson Orth Associates, Inc. - Tom Osterberg .\ \• \{ 11 I _ } 11 E hill E j I --E I E --E •^ a s` I z a a i I c t I / \'� i ik . • • • • �I ii :t: i�. ki ! i tL ` f t i �i € •► Ik sII I I a-a a a: a •T1 '. •staff + II 1 : i i! rf g\ s► EI I lI lililli�illi it iliiil= t Il kilo s I T ! € 2 V2 4Mij iii I I cc 1 \ a \\ I ial a II IiIIiiII• it mil gI s Es 'E \r. "S. i =. . I i I I a \ I I I -l-I :1111 • 11111 s EI • m \ � _F. \ �. IPi Tr* 1111qq11 C _ 1 -A1/4.....t5:::...ma .P� (I .is t:1` fae pig €a.al a p 4j aw. ' p i I I 1 = i p4 i La 11 a[i I T a t p 2 :j N Ei:. 9 L I ' pI FLa Its iit:iTE i i L • o^N an X • b z i • t\ , sI{: . z a 2. i. 5.-• / w m a:'' g 0 �' 9... '•i' C• ; }• w - • •tiA s y F w o ; .�- by _ _ : i1 •,, � Z,, a ,( �\�.� 3; •.•pct ' �•. _ _/// . •I * N. 1 . 7t • -• '. ., C/,/ ;\. •ry:x- 517 ` /rte : v . . i SN'1;.-_ X e \ w t Z Z �!CT a . ,.. W Y c 6 •.: ".1 -. ollik ' • - ' � 'tr C Lw [ e. -c,--; ) --'.... .*. ' ._ t c- = u — _..„ .. t.1Z, „___ 4 7.Y4. ..e ,, �,'�'?orf-,?,,:-.%-,,i-.5„..4 - ; :.` .,.t'$ ,,;. �' � ?iii :ii_ �• t 3R -,-„'„Iir- ••-•‘\ ..,0. :‘,„, v 4 ' 3! o i. _ Ar- • - ✓mow_ • • • 'D p O, d a>1.E a C C O •-�.� 7adaa > > d O C 0c - -° .-= c— '- L cp, _13 a' `d ° > 03a a 0y.2«. _� U L a .`2 it La7 O ° -9- j, Q ) dLof Oi5 O-c N bc x ,- a v p c a) cu m ` c E - a .nac O• 0O >^ cC71LL ' Oa ° °` ° O,Q a ° EO °id= - ° > N dL3 > a O0 ' 0 ° 1 a0(") C d E - - O<'� w CO .o W C ° - L a a'O T_ C a •� •_ 30 03 • 0 ) L _od :i3-L5 .E y v ~ a ,_ do od d dx °,h a) C 6QV O•- C-0 ° 0•V ° :-'...11. rn).ac E c L >-n 33d -c c a) `C P ° -c,C m 3 Z ' flc E . ° o ,3 �° cZLE a ° . > '' o o >_Lof On LO ` ON O a cc,,,,,-0 : 2, ° `) cCas a) o oO 5 aW0 � 2 `` . °J0 O.-r-c; .. . a' ° °'s >. ° '7 ' a - Co . -6 o ° : ° E x .n ° >`a o " v ^ ° ' . 0 c - a) `- c L dco0 ° p n E 3 � Y o E• - E ' ° LO o )Nv + a y ;) Oc— o a, cd• a^'O > > CO >. j "- - EoC7cc ' uoo �' c ;c c.D o ELo aal, N o a ° O O ° dd In . o 2 '. oOo ° , a : v - E d QO `vi 3L = . xC- ° du C v oa) o „ , 3 d a c�Z vQ a O. — 3 dr` � N ornao ,A ' a �Q d000 � � accm o3rn )- QaO , cvU000 � a L�aTo03 Ev �o0 E �X � -«a3- 0 � ° _ ; o) ` . odv � E c v gd r1da.,, °, aon3 3O ° o L °v d 'K >.•-o O 'y > �F-— c O3.. aLN O O • ° _a a x >. a, C d a d — p a ° d i 'O+- ° O H-a 'o"O v G .c ° v > °— ` •a, � • ,5,., dac, O 2.- Li, oL tnv > ° ado ... � Qd � O > r E t T ` Noa 3 2.cNV L co .�iT O "O > °) 2 -2NW O • 7 7 a 6. d VoT �Lc-oocuF•E 3 E Oa, oc _O '7o NMLa) O'oL aN3d et tr, •• S aws .a)Lwrn - HO . • d o - o c7,- S -�� ° vvE d dao : E ad d ^ E d Z c ,Q vwu ' aDm ° Oacoa0Qca am � m Q L or E1E od oL .. o3 ' 0 ff = L Li '°' > a- .uof '' pyc ▪ ° 0 `m ° ; oZvcu. ° p. cd> >>• - u � nE), ° mN3 S ° NoLcc- c0 E4? C v�� .c °� ° 0 d E ° 3 . no.Eo-)n a0 s3�o 7c Q s a- Oa o f>� = a d . E E a 3tc cd so " « C a^° aa—E,. • I • a ` 0 d' 6 cL a ° d yCHc o c d 3 L a ° a. „;<- ° oQv c > a ,) ° S °s ° ° a ° anQw o o ° °s.5 .� 3 is y. r _ wLL n 1� �l W c Ct ,..1 EL CL �, F (` i.i m ,! m -�` W • g,. S Z S •} a . FC s f� co :.......,'''' .4;- -I O 1 d:.;' • o v :• r•- '•�\ .Y d .O Q f. -; �. _ iti ilrii • ....ks"-,,ACK;-141.. ti -----"o- -— - 7 a . r1 G1"'.0 y c V '''E O d -`43, d C r(J` E d C ° .... OC+O d N 1L�-- ` 6, -Cr 6> 30 0-Y C o Q ` s.E— `_ a v_o v 'a O..{:21 o o c v $ o (1") 'a ° �°Z 0 >O no Q c c S O C cu— -- -- -0 4, 0 v o � 4'? o 13 v a>• v „,-a „ ` 0,6-0 a o�.O O 0 O °Q C ° 0•}L O h.D O.E v E E 0 0 0 at N o ° 0`1 a ; a"O y K D1 c N Q1 ° °0 O V 6i 0 -X—- 6, 673.c .. a. •,-,„_. -- rn E c N c 3 a 8L•=Oh a o E or o o a v o_cu o o ao c•= a 3�'E >r� °s c p o 0 > T =L 13 E- -°-o of a V 0 O t O 01 00 H f")O•.O�'• f") CV C Q, Q, 00 ` of y 0, a a1 y ; p c 6, C s N >, L Y a1 IS 6) 6. c _CO w O 0 O vs—>.- 0 O E C") O ; 0 a > O'Et"' a Ta 0 0 1 O ` L O „ a t O X 0'0 •L N 0 6,cc E p a v ,„ 6, C - „ p ° a' 0 0 7 0 d•.- O CU a V 0 0 `y C C p>. 7 y 62 c _L•N O c V V p 4 0 0 „ 0-._ 0.G - V L a W C_ 6, `, E a 0 0-a �,L O 0 O c _O•� 0 ; a• V °N a L O= C•_°6, O ,E E 0 „ c H�: a O. "^ E 4 O ,A a~, a s a > ° ��— a °°' a o � ' N� °.,,� 6,U ; _° ,Q c ° E E� a c ,•-0 llv a ` o ` c a`, 0 0ca o O c v .- '—" p N 0 0 O C E L d M ° a N o Ql ° p .d E C `p 601 j'` 0 c pL.1„' Of T °. O �, E o _ v 0 T 0 `L 3 Z o?• 2 O O V C C L,E 0 1'- 0 co1LI: 0 'N N E L C a1 `) O 6,=L ° 0 E -C o1 C c O a,� X •O O`.0 O Q) 4:12 o ; C „CN C U a a1 � v O o•c -(-1C .60 �� •_ o o o o a �.N Q, Qo�O E a� „��--�° a'c a o 2 a H X Y L w d p E E a 0 U '^ v 6 W a N 'Y O 'V^ '� O O •C•> a .0 c c> 7 6 p weg L. v. ` 0 �� 61 a a a ; p � � O 0 0 0 ::_,..5.'-' ° �� ; 0 C— O"o'o O V ~ p s r a T '-0 73 CC Oraa N c m U :� O .c - p ~ sA 6i m ° O d c : 2 C Q ° O d O 6. ° c VI Eilill 07 O ; a)-0 0 L 6 O a 0 O - °�[ - 8 W O Qi C ° „ p 0 ; p C 0 �'E. ` � O•�� .L..I,c., d O L O ; ; V C•� C C C O-p � Q O T 6 Y v u Q E u - o a - 0Z v_ 6r ; ; - ° v m cc_.= °V ,�,L � c E rn`c aC7vVv1'� p = o� „ oQ'vt-a � o o d— O � °• „� 6`,�Q C•V O- a a C 6, -_ ' C C C E ` p EJ0Cc6, p 0 0 ;0 ,J O L aso C = O c O O'a °_ N `1 o O �? 6, w t „ d"o a d L .� C«. 1V of a Q ; v O ; OJ • • al I.:'' -`••,. T W N liW l" it . F V. W w d N N \ : 7 . 6 Q i 4 a. "Ilti:4iiik. ..T_N,_ 1. tp u +7y •! ' a • _____„.„,...p,... .. . re CI 7.j1 i / i fI[` � • " • .-•:X.. ..-Tif:'17...' -•• 4,li .A:: _ - _. s-. a o-o N. t''.0.`..4'',` 1.: .•"t1 `t •i44%. .qt. • O \ -�P '` 0 a c fes ' 41f .�: .2 u ry . A tit ,,,. Z •E. o ; �► � c 63 N h d - C .c r, v daH D't E..L' a C ' ° ic E .nL C °po EL '0)` vd3 • C ° a.C6 - DD ..._• ° ° 1jCaL -2 s n °v Oa V j D O 'C O w O 7 N L C C � wCL O32E ° v.c�N,� ° 6.Q 6 >. OwNaCI 7 0 '0' a� ° O '^cn ` oC E ` ; = 'C6 f _ O Ca- . N O - ° -O "C a- E• Os' d °) • O C c 3 •- ` Oa ° C. a E ` F �'3•c °) o .- m v E rn —.D d .. L . O ' " ' NOwC ° L .-` C° = XVa d C ? > .c p 4.D cE °-• ~ 6 a T -0 d v ° - aTEcca, rnwv o ° o ` rn a o •Eo o a-0 0 ° a, a : am.n 13 r, „ ,_ E dw a C E e, °�p c = .- _o c • — .in _ c _ NL > E 70 ° o ▪ OOw •~ °) Oy a, C . — d O a -a of a >,w. Q7 a > t3 2 vaaooL0 ` UC .' Ea ° rn ° . 0a c ° r , �' a _ 2� O Ea .- - CT_0E -0 crc-a3tv Het .2g O d ° N c°O ,, >•.0 E ?o °.YO13 d 7O OT L ti, )' ,OO . ` ap C r- ° =LOndCa flEou • M Qv o 1 c O .� — r-a• ad > N N d X-° C0O a E C.U aC L U ° a OD.° yDCpa, ° OD. °d ° ° ° aNaW-- 0 E — Ec ° ° aa 2T ° • CV Z.,' C•- 4 „ ° a - . . a a,= ° mLE �C f o av �a 4) t. TO 0. E «•-_o•o E; °) °+Oc � Ov'n'y0t W+ EJ ° > Q ^ ° O °c-a aa _ d v O E J a, ° 7 v n ` O_ - w a, a . NErQ ° 30•0..- °ED •••- o, , co .E S a ao a a — o d ° c0a — E . Qooo °o Q ° L E ° Q °Ls o o ; ° by y a u 1 arn ° o—L ooa � n v aa'` - an C 0 O•D cc °) C_ ,- ` yCLW E ` a) C ° a— Cd ° 0a . . ° o•� . -Od .E 3dd G ° v > o. Q, a a, E H o o E v 0 •- c av° ., C v T E rw ToaE 3Y = QoE E — ` w`a am Tv n I▪ I'-,5 N v a o v t m a E t ° O v `C O a al Q a ° maQ ° as , svLv v� a a E 7 . Z c m_ N a U 0 C k-' 1 .f....*.-t, r cg Nilittltill; M c r W W C W P a• o , a V V o o V c 0 4' l/ Ir411411112273112 d ® O d • u .O. Ceg L > y y Ils. v WI • o " 4, �Q�Z••. c 2 r, 3 w Y u » • 0 a W a, c m Y ` ii ® Q d p ��' .. x a m c v G c /r \l'‘11i t.' L ‘r/. (4(4(i' `l c .a `o- a N .tyle / . /. 2I s' 1 • !T fit +'d'i+'�'1 j/ O1 L. " -kly4.- W '4141 1. _ ,�, �i ` +� h, i\v. 3 41 4 • 2 a "v W r �� i.S a• \1 s s owe N d Cg t �IA��' • N ', a , • 0 O r. !/fes \` F •,,,, • �I,b,I1.., '-'• 1% •' •� . a . . �lr �r,�.• ,_f/ 11 1 1 i!' cu N i o "^/� •� V'!t•. :a�%.�...j'.I�iV�j•..�i i^�.,.%t."� i� j J,'. �.�•..i`,a,.. ` ° o C .i '9,411 •,Y".""-, "V\- o \_ as}r�'�.� tj:'4 v o A s 26 0 >..o O C a . .Q O t i e d ar'� O 0 C 3 ` a, O O y a, o.E 6 S N ' O O` 6 5 6 O - 6_c j o - _ O("2 0, 6 p1 Z— -a O 61 3 .c p E a ° O v s H p p c . d O d . H p C O c Y a,-c a, d"6 «. a Vi E 6 • N ,_ C j_c C_c >L w .E ° 2 a, 6 7 3 E '•n 6 C L t C',•3 y o 0 v Q _ a O-0Z ; 2 &F-'� O 0 0 ° �� a 6 E.' 6 C 0'C u 0' c °-o -p p V a °H- „` A) O 6 • ° O .a,^2.n _T y.x N O-O p c.C2 O c 7 Z a�m6 c v a Nv Cr'V > a " p ° p0 3 . 6 av-0 ° "� S a ri c . 0 p G y p O-0 O 0 , C ,,- 0,, ° Hm N -6 a)x-C ONY 60i m a • E v > c0.. C 'a' - . y >, V O v • O O • OC"O c - V O y 6 2, 6 O c T O ° a� T O 4r O L C•- 0 T� F "p p E T C c p 6 a,'c O s .D V O O C O --6 C C O C a y V h), . O FT 3 C O L '1 a,Y . O'�Y y W O C ° E•c O O L_ E C N O C O O 3 E ° 6 `,D v Q,.O 6 al 12 N,_ G V Oii w g.' oa, v= c.E ° 44 a ca,�.-' po o� c ° ic cc .- � 6a °.n : vEE .. a c C'a.0 j-0 `, °i O O O -OT' _o m= .n 7 L O L'D.. O rn a c aX,S° Q. d O .... a — o -c o N O al 6 0 u ar ' G 6 C C.'u `- C.°'w > ° '' Opf 0 C C s U 7 C) '^ C Cin a) O C v p p) d .V 6 L C 3 L d ' 3 -C2 Y _ - ` > T O.- W 3 p .0,. ar L a C Y •='° O -0 a 6 a t c c.p O W N O p T . .� ° a O aci O.a ° O'E 6 Vla °en L c s O c �a p 3 ° O at pf V Y y s O•�� O N ce 72 d v 61"° a v T p O c O a, O-0 T O c V O 6f C L71 d gt 6- C 3 o c .^10 yaj 01 - in G,T ~=p 3 0 c 6 Cg )`'6 o L 6 `,Ln 7 0 m 3 C 0 C.- cO s v 0 m 00 C ,... 0 t : ° ,_ >; 7 a ° , 6 6 Y!•v 6 �. N 6 .-N.- a a, 0 8 ; 6 6 yd„ v ._-° 3 - 0 .- G 4)- C Y-- c_0 _c ..,w 0 OZ U 1-C 3 . W O O s y ` • a ` 4r a n d L-6 c E c A, V O- O «` C c 6, 6 v yi v 0 0 C N r' 0 >. -13 C- N E 3 O N «•w — 6 U E o Q 6- o.O f a, a 6,-6 G o .•6.E 0.0 o 2 = o ff-o wS i o a`, " " d Ta aZUEU mc° N, 3 .°0.o3_a0 OC�°sN � ° a,o— `_ a 33 °tea ° J . >• T p T ° 0 a, v V ° L 61_c O _c'�1L )` O Q • I O V C a 6 7- +pad -- a'a . =11.1.1.111....1111, 1 ,i�� / 0 v/ 1 BUSINESS`\i .-f7,,,--' ": t(j SCHEDULE 04,p ,.' ; 6 r ASSN B. - ESS .° • ,,,...........,::).:,_<-- .....-.,- ,-,,,, . (:).° 7.>..„,,,,,,,,..:\ilezi,,o, , ....:...7... .--,..:., .. _ 0•\ 3:. ,..., ,--- 1,...,• v -! !•.;.-' ,-;.. .,-Ili,,•-•"7- : \'' 141r, 0 , - • 4- ;.: %-2 '2- �` ` \ ,S EC O % j-''./ 1 .,-,.;%.„-.....,,i_ ,.•c!.- ., .-- ,.....") ,.t. \I :.. ( 41fr :\ .‘ \ \"\s‘ ', ' \a ►��:• - `sem' si I • / , , \-. \ \ ,. \ . C' \ j 77 °•e ' V\\' ..:••\, , ),,, ,e..--/' I—— ---:-..,ws %,.ZS1:...\. 0 -,\ fit; \•II � : :-. 7 e N ..-' . \ ..., 9BI3 1. \` Z POND NO. I — Irr ;I-'- \ • c� t• �* _ NWL 913.00 \• • )i_ ' ' ; HWL 916.73 /• ;/.. 3 ./ , ...,/,/,‘,„ .4/ -,` 912 p 0p,,A, \ 7 e.OUTL / n� G . /: �t x / r , 3 / J HANHkASS-EN i '� ¢• .p ov- \ 924 _.'_ :�,y ' �� AP iS r"---..0 NS• ._ ,i. , ;��;\kine000� //:\ NOT . \ \ OR CHANH -' _ . „ APE PLA �► - -- ��d / SEE LA1 • 1D5C it �: ._ --- • - CENTER FOR. LANDSCAPI ALONG AND LAKE'-DRIVE WEST. ,. �ZZ c• CHAN H ASS -NN-- -- - BUSINESS . CEN OUTLO}T — A 4 -. - A-:. • VAR. Ihritr. I Or NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ' .... = - t 1046w PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PA*01.4 St Wednesday, August 2, 1995 01011V11 :" ,�� '% — at7•00 p.m. 0.011,11/0 e City Hall Council Chambers .. r pi amiCI J r 690 Coulter Drive 61111710. 1r , ii,.';'•-•,-,1,, IIIUi Project: Office Warehouse Facility sly ��`,�,.• / Ir .' ��G� ; v'�i, `"ghn�0 / tit _7:17:iAt t'37' 4j�i S Developer: Highland Development ' e,..,;�/-- , ,. Mr. ;�;_ Location: Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen � 17:7711,) i #-1 Business Center 2nd Addition , v . ,+ in ��' t* SIJ SMS. 1 iii 16; - Notice: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a development proposed in your area. The applicant is Highland Development, Inc. for a site plan review of a 9,161 square foot office/warehouse facility on a 1.57 acre lot, property zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development Industrial, located on Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen Business Center 2nd Addition. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an over view of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The Commission will then make a recommendation to the City Council. Questions or Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob at 937-1900, ext. 141. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 20, 1995. Heritage Development, Inc. Chan-Land Partners 450 Co. Road D East 200 Hwy. 13 West Little Canada, MN 55117 Burnsville, MN 55337 lubon 92 Twin Cities & Western '41 Creekside Court Railroad :n Prairie, MN 55346 2925 12th Street East Glencoe, MN 55336 P.C. DATE: 8-2-95 67' CIT T�/ O F C.C. DATE: 8-28-95 CASE: 95-14 Site Plan `I CUAIIAE N 95-2 CUP, 95-14 SUB B Y: Al-Jaff:v STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: 1) Site Plan Review for the construction of an 8,044 square foot Day Care Center, Children's World Learning Center 111' 2) Preliminary Plat to Replat Outlot B, McGlynn Park Addition, an 8.79 acre Z parcel, into one lot of 1.15 acres and one outlot of 7.64 acres 3) Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Day Care Center in an IOP District VLOCATION: South of McGlynn Road, West of Audubon Road,and North of Coulter Boulevard. a. APPLICANT : Doug Stahl Children's World Learning Center Schoell & Madson, Inc. 573 Park Point Drive Q 10580 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 1 Golden, CO 80401 Minnetonka, MN 55305 PRESENT ZONING: IOP, Industrial Office Park ACREAGE: 8.79 acres ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: N - McGlynn Road/IOP S - Coulter Boulevard/IOP E - Audubon Road/IOP W - Vacant Land/IOP QSEWER AND WATER: Services are available to the site. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The trees on the site are a mixture of significant and 11.1 insignificant trees in size and quality. The street alignment I— for Coulter Boulevard is graded and improved. McGlynn Road is a paper street, a platted, unimproved right-of-way. The site contains remnants of an old farmstead foundation. 2000 LAND USE: Office/Industrial , i �41 % °k � *Airtitt LAKE ANN � ►_ _ 0111111 L° • ICN ` WilIV ' pi . in ).. k :. ,i:'--4:: ' TRUF.- C. ___--- --'"---- '11111Hw1 i LAKE ANN PA/ . i I I —. 1 ____, 1 _ ___ 44p 411111k ARBORS UM �' -~ BOULEVARD s ) \ N Lr'„d. P4 Q CO �1 c s 10° !�: cGLYNN �,� ilkTIM�ERW OD LOCATI • i �� IlL.---a. OM . p4„ ; •\x.m . R, _ biro ' Will I I Tr?, csac....2.) ,, ,,, ,, " P pm ,-s 41 i , ..., I. " lige ..7 1111 ditill„1/11 C,C\' 611111inous ' 1 ijal nal - ;,,,. .-0 4a a�!►�� /1 Wei Isom. 4 oA.,flis u ply �� 11111► ♦ ♦ Q , . . ... (C.R. 18 ) ,` ,,'♦,,♦/ PARK �a1lI �-� �� . .AO a ,, I w1 ulwatiiiiiNro l • 1./ I VALLEY 11 :1_ � • ;QQ' VIEW p WV Offit.G ina 11 so arp. CWR7• 0— ` PARK ` P * • U rf �'� C� OSPREJ.\ :44 I ` I . �/��©ii Er' 13 � 1 LA I 11P1re SUNR`� ill gig. • Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY There are three actions being requested with this application, a subdivision, a conditional use permit and site plan review for a day care facility. The site is zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park and bordered by McGlynn Road to the north, Coulter Boulevard to the south and Audubon Road to the east. The lot area of the day care facility site is 1.15 acres. It is located in an Industrial Office Park District. At the present time, the site is visible directly from Highway 5 and has full access from McGlynn Road. A day care is a conditional use in the IOP District. In an accompanying subdivision request, the site is being replatted from an 8.79 acre outlot, into one lot of 1.15 acres, which will contain the Children's World building, and one outlot of 7.64 acres which will be reserved for future development. Staff is not aware of any pending developments for the outlot. The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action. Conditions proposed for review would result in dedication of all required easements. The site plan is for the Children's World Learning Center and is reasonably well developed. The building is proposed to utilize face brick on all four sides accented by columns, a synthetic plaster band, a canopy, and has a pitched roof. Parking for vehicles is located on the north side of the building. Vehicles will be screened from Highway 5 by berms and landscaping materials as well as future buildings which will be constructed between McGlynn Road and Highway 5. The site landscaping is generally of high quality however, there are certain areas such as the south and west portion of the site that are lacking in vegetation. A variety of trees and bushes must be used. A meandering berm of 3 to 4 feet in height runs along the edge of the site. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the Highway 5 corridor's image. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan, without variances, conditional use permit and subdivision requests for this proposal. DACKGROUND On August 8, 1988, the City Council approved subdivision #88-13 of 69.7 acres into one lot and two outlots. Lot 1 became the site for the McGlynn Bakeries building which was approved as a permitted use in the IOP District concurrently with the subdivision. Outlots A and B were reserved for future development. Outlot B is being proposed for subdivision into one lot and one outlot with this application. Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 3 GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The proposed Children's World building with an area of 8,044 square feet, will be situated parallel to and south of McGlynn Road. The site is bordered by McGlynn Road to the north and Audubon Road to the east. Access to the building is proposed from McGlynn Road. Parking will be located to the north between the building and McGlynn Road. A meandering berm with landscaping, 3 to 4 feet in height, is proposed to be installed along the parameters of the site to provide screening. The Children's World building is located 111 feet from the north, 30 feet from the east, 45.33 feet from the south, and 81.67 feet from the west property line. Materials used on the building will consist of face brick on all four sides. The entry will have a canopy with columns and a synthetic plaster band detailing. The building's architecture is tastefully designed and meets the standards of the site plan ordinance requirements. This development falls within the Highway Corridor Overlay and must comply with the districts design standards in addition to the Industrial Office Park Standards. The purpose of the overlay district is to promote high-quality architectural and site design through improved development standards with the corridor. The design standards should create a unified, harmonious and high quality visual environment. The plan and design of the proposed development meets the intent of the overlay district with the following features: • The building will be one story and the architectural style is unique to the Pillsbury building but will fit in. The building will provide a variation in style through the use of columns and a pitched roof as well as a pitched canopy. The building is utilizing exterior materials that are durable and of high quality. The applicant must show the colors proposed to be used on the building. • The site slopes easterly, and grading of the entire site is required. The existing site grade ranges from 982 in the southwest corner to 966± on Audubon Road. The trees on the site are a mixture of significant and insignificant trees in size and quality. Developing the site will result in the loss of these trees. The landscaping plan provides a variety of plant materials that are massed where possible, particularly along McGlynn Road and Audubon Road. The berm and landscaping materials will be continuous along the parameters of the site. The plant materials are repetitious in some locations and variable in others. Proposed plant materials are indigenous to Minnesota. A curb is required along the parameters of the green space area. All planting areas are adequate in size to allow trees to grow. Additional plantings will be required. Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 4 • A parking lot light plan is required. The plan should incorporate the light style and height. Staff is also requiring a more detailed sign plan which should include lighting method. • The site plan shows the trash enclosure located west of the day care building screened by a detached structure utilizing wood doors with siding and trim to match the building. Current state statutes require that recycling space be provided for all new buildings. The area of the recycling space must be dedicated at the rate specified in Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) 1300.4700 Subp. 5. The applicant should demonstrate the required area will be provided in addition to the space required for other solid waste collection space. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 5 c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the City's Highway 5 corridor design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and the site plan review requirements. The site design is compatible with the surrounding development. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. WETLANDS There do not appear to be wetlands on the parcel, however, staff does need verification from the applicant on this issue. GRADING The entire site is proposed to be graded and leveled off for the building and parking lot. The site ranges from 983.0 in the southwest corner of the lot to 968.0 in the northeast corner. The building is proposed to be approximately 7 feet higher than Audubon Road. The proposed grading will require removal of the existing trees on the site. McGlynn Road as proposed is a paper street. The right-of-way was platted with the first phase of McGlynn Park. The street (McGlynn Road) will need to be upgraded to full City standards in conjunction with this development proposal. DRAINAGE The site drains naturally to the easterly side of the property out to Audubon Road. The grading proposes maintaining the existing drainage pattern. The front parking lot will drain to proposed catch basins in the parking lot. Storm sewer will need to be extended from Audubon Road along McGlynn Drive to service this site. The plans propose a low area and a catch basin to convey runoff from the west side of the building south of the parking lot. This Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 6 could be a potential problem for the children playing in the area. Staff recommends creating a drainage swale outside of the children's play area along the westerly property line which will require grading into the outlot. This will provide a safe and dry area for the children's tot lot. Storm sewer calculations for a 10-year and 100-year storm event of 24-hour duration shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final plat approval. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) The City has adopted a Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) that serves as a tool to protect, preserve and enhance water resources. The plan identifies, from a regional perspective, the storm water quantity and quality improvements necessary to allow future development to take place and minimize its impact to downstream water bodies. In general, the water quantity portion of the plan uses a 100-year design storm interval for ponding and a 10-year design storm interval for storm sewer piping. The water quality portion of the plan uses William Walker, Jr.'s Pondnet model for predicting phosphorus concentrations in shallow water bodies. An ultimate conditions model has been developed at each drainage area based on the projected future land use, and therefore, different sets of improvements under full development were analyzed to determine the optimum phosphorus reduction in priority water bodies. Storm Water Quality and Associated Fees The SWMP has established a water quality connection charge for each new subdivision based on land use. Dedication shall be equal to the cost of land and pond volume needed for treatment of the phosphorus load leaving the site. The requirement for cash in lieu of land and pond construction shall be based upon a schedule in accordance with the prescribed land use zoning. Values are calculated using market values of land in the City of Chanhassen plus a value of $2.50 per cubic yard for excavation of the pond. A regional stormwater quality pond is located south of the Pillsbury facility just north of the railroad tracks which pretreats stormwater runoff from the Pillsbury site and Audubon Road. The proposed SWMP water quality charge for industrial development such as this is $2,507 per acre. Since this parcel will be served by the storm sewer from Audubon Road the City's surface water quality connection fees should be waived if the applicant extends the storm sewer through the site to the westerly property line along McGlynn Road. Storm Water Quantity and Associated Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average city-wide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Industrial developments will have a storm water quantity connection charge of Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 7 • $4,360 per developable acre. The total developable area of the property is 1.15 acres; therefore, the proposed development would then be responsible for a water quantity connection charge of $5,014. This parcel may have previously been assessed for Audubon Road improvements such as storm sewer. Therefore, the connection charge should be re- evaluated and reduced accordingly based on previous storm sewer assessments. Staff will review the water quality connection fees based on the final construction plans and the previous assessments for this parcel from Audubon Road. EROSION CONTROL An erosion control plan has been incorporated into the grading and drainage plan. Staff finds the plan in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook for erosion control measures. All disturbed areas shall be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to prevent erosion and sedimentation. Protection around catch basins such as hay bales or silt fence is also required until the pavement is installed. UTILITIES Back in 1988, Phase I of Audubon Road (McGlynn Park) was constructed. Phase II of the development which was never constructed included McGlynn Road (looped street). In conjunction with Audubon Road construction, utility stubouts were extended in the direction of McGlynn Road for future extension. In order to service this development, utilities will need to be extended along McGlynn Road to the west property line (approximately 200 feet). Extension of the utility improvements is typically done by the applicant/developer. The applicant may petition the City to install the utilities and construct the street; however, the City's bonding capacity is limited as well as the number of projects that are in front of this will not allow construction until at least 1997 or later. In addition, the project would have to be expanded to include additional properties. The City cannot legally order a public improvement project for the sole interest of one property owner. If the applicant installs the utility improvements they will receive credit from the City for the oversizing costs of the utility lines. The credit could be applied to existing assessments against the parcel. Credit would be given for the cost difference between an 8-inch watermain and the proposed 10-inch watermain. The applicant will be required to enter into a development contract for construction of the public street and utility improvements and to guarantee compliance with the conditions of approval. Detailed construction plans and specifications in accordance with City standards will be required for staff review and formal City Council approval in conjunction with final plat consideration. Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 8 STREETS The site borders Audubon Road on the east and McGlynn Road on the north. Access to the site is proposed from McGlynn Road. The street does not exist at this time but there is public right-of-way dedicated to the City. The street was proposed to be constructed under the Phase II development plan of the McGlynn Park proposal. Construction plans and specifications were prepared but never executed. Without upgrading McGlynn Road to full City industrial standards (36 feet wide face-to-face), the site does not have access due to grade differences along Audubon Road and therefore, should be considered premature in development. An 8-foot wide concrete sidewalk exists along the west side of Audubon Road adjacent to the site as well as boulevard trees. The applicant shall be responsible for replacing any sidewalk or boulevard trees damaged during construction of the site improvements. The applicant should post security escrow (letter of credit or cash escrow) to guarantee boulevard restoration. This will be added in the development contract. PARKING/INTERIOR CIRCULATION The City's parking ordinance for day care centers requires a design capacity of one stall for each six children. The applicant is providing 26 parking spaces. The total number of children enrolled at the day care may not exceed 146. Access to the site is proposed through one curb cut on McGlynn Road. Staff is concerned with the lack of parking area and proper circulation through the site based on the land use. The plans indicate 16 employees and up to 146 children occupying the area. The parking lot is providing 26 spaces which meets the ordinance but that leaves approximately only 10± spaces for drop-off and pick-up which seems low given the proposed land use. Another concern staff has is with the circulation in the parking lot. With only one access buses will not be able to turn around and cars coming and going will be limited to one ingress/egress point. Staff believes another access point should be added on the east end of the parking lot on McGlynn Road approximately 90 feet west of the intersection of Audubon Road and McGlynn Road. The Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) requires that handicapped parking spaces be provided at the rate of one handicapped space per every 50 spaces in the lot(s). This calculates out to 1 space. The submitted site plan shows three handicapped parking spaces. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has specific requirements for van spaces which currently are not part of the MSBC. These requirements are not enforced by the Inspections Division, but should be incorporated into the site plan. Site approaches are regulated by the Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 9 MSBC, and are not detailed on the site plan. Curb cuts, width, texture and slope are details that must be included on the site plans. Landscaping is proposed along the north and west side, adjacent to McGlynn Road and Audubon Road, to screen the parking area. A meandering landscaped berm, 3 to 4 feet in height, is proposed to be installed along the parameters of the site. Staff is recommending additional landscaping materials be added to screen the site along the south and west portions of the site to provide additional screening. LANDSCAPING The landscaping plan is well conceived. The applicant is providing a variety of plantings throughout the parking lot and especially along the perimeters of the sites. The plant materials include ornamental conifer, deciduous trees, and shrubs. Plantings, as well as the design and material used on the building, have been done tastefully. Staff is recommending some modification to the landscaping plan. The incorporation of a meandering berm with landscaping along the parameters of the site. The parking area is setback 30 feet from the property line, which is in compliance with the ordinance requirements. The site has an existing woods covering 0.67 acres (58%) of the 1.15 acre lot. The woods are a mix of native species including elm, ash, cottonwood, and box elder. Generally, it is a young woods with 2 special trees, a 28 inch elm and a 24 inch box elder, within it. Considering the proposed plans, it would not be possible to preserve those trees. The applicant is required to preserve a minimum canopy area of 20% or 0.23 acres. The applicant has proposed to remove all existing vegetation. Code requires a replacement planting of 1.2 times the amount of required canopy being removed. The applicant must provide 11 trees of replacement plantings as well as 9 trees to meet the 20% minimum canopy area. The parking lot also requires a total of 3 trees to meet minimum code requirement. At a minimum, 23 trees would be required for this development. The landscape plan lists 27 trees to be planted on site. However, staff recommends 5 more trees be planted along the west portion of the site and 6 trees along the southern edge from the city's approved primary or secondary deciduous. Increased plantings along the western edge would not only screen future neighboring developments, but also provide increased shade for the play area in the summer and protection from westerly winds and sun. LIGHTIN G Lighting locations have not been illustrated on the plans. Only shielded fixtures are allowed and the applicant shall demonstrate that there is no more than 1/2 foot candles of light at the property line as required by ordinance. Detailed lighting plan should be submitted when Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 10 building permits are requested. Street lights consistent with Audubon Road will be required along McGlynn Road at 200 feet intervals, staggered from one side to the other. SIGNAGE The applicant has submitted a signage plan. One ground low profile business sign is permitted per lot. The area of the sign may not exceed 80 square feet and a height of 8 feet. The applicant is showing a 6 foot tall sign with an area of 24 square feet. Also, one wall mounted sign shall be permitted per street frontage. The total display area shall not exceed 15% of the total area of the building wall upon which the signs are mounted. No sign may exceed 90 square feet. The applicant is showing a wall mounted sign of 12.5 square feet. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting the signs on site. One stop sign must be posted on the driveway at the exit point of both sites. A detailed sign plan incorporating the method of lighting, acceptable to staff should be provided prior to requesting a building permit. COMPLIANCE TABLE - IOP DISTRICT Ordinance Children's World Building Height 2 stories 1 story Building Setback N-30' E-30' N-111' E-30 S-30' W-30' S-45.33' W-81.67' Parking stalls 24 stalls 26 stalls Parking Setback N-25' E-25' N-30' E-30' S-25' W-10' S-NA W-25' Hard surface 70% 45% Coverage Lot Area 1 acre 1.15 acres Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 11 PARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION FEES The City is requiring that park and trails fees be submitted in lieu of park land. Fees are to be paid in accordance to city ordinance. One third of the fees will be required at the time of final plat recording. ,SUBDIVISION The subdivision proposal is a request that will serve to subdivide an 8.79 acre outlot, into one lot of 1.15 acres, which will contain the Children's World building, and one outlot of 7.64 acres which will be reserved for future development. Staff is not aware of any pending developments for the outlot. The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action. Conditions proposed for review would result in dedication of all required easements. The following easements are either illustrated on the plat or should be acquired: 1. Standard drainage and utility easements around the perimeters of all lots. 2. Dedication of public right-of-way. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Day care centers are permitted in the IOP District as a conditional use. The following constitutes staffs review of this proposal against conditional use permit standards. GENERAL ISSUANCE STANDARDS 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or city. FINDING - The site is zoned IOP. The proposed use will not create any significant or unexpected impacts from this use. It will provide a convenient location for employees of the office industrial park to drop off their children. 2. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. FINDING - The proposed use would be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. The use is also in compliance with the Hwy. 5 Corridor Plan. It meets the requirements of the design standards as discussed in the site plan/architecture section. Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 12 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. FINDING - The site is located adjacent to a collector road. It is in the industrial district and as such, a day care center is fully consistent with this site. Architectural standards required by the Highway 5 corridor study and the site plan requirements are being adhered to. 4. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. FINDING - There will be no measurable impacts to the existing or planned neighboring uses. This use will have traffic patterns that should combine trips with existing businesses. 5. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. FINDING - Full city services are available to be extended to this site. Roads serving the site, which will include McGlynn Road, are fully capable of handling the access needs of this proposal. 6. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. FINDING - Staff is not aware of any excessive requirements for public facilities. However, we do believe that there is always a need for a day care center within any office industrial park. The day care use is a good auxiliary use for the industrial park. 7. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. FINDING - This site will not create adverse impacts to persons, property or the general welfare of the area. Hours of operation, orientation of the building, and lighting standards will comply with city ordinances. Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 13 8. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. FINDING - The site is visible from a major highway and is accessible from that highway by an intersection with a collector street designed to commercial standards. There will be no direct traffic impacts to any area residential neighborhood. 9. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. FINDING - The development of this site will not result in the loss of any features of major significance. 10. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. FINDING - The site plan is well designed to provide adequate landscaping and buffering from adjoining properties. The building is to be built of brick accented by columns, synthetic plaster trim, and a canopy which is consistent with the Highway 5 overlay district. 11. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. FINDING - The site is being used for a day care type of operation which is consistent with its designation. It will not depreciate surrounding property values. On the contrary, it will add a convenient location for employees working in the surrounding area to drop off their children. 12. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. FINDING - The following is our review of conditions of approval and appropriate findings: a. The site shall have loading and drop off points designed to avoid interfering with traffic and pedestrian movements FINDING - The building is surrounded by a sidewalk to allow pedestrian movement. b. Outdoor play areas shall be located and designed in a manner which mitigates visual and noise impacts on adjoining residential areas. Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 14 FINDING - There are no adjoining residential areas. c. Each center shall obtain all applicable state, county, and city licenses. FINDING - Staff will ensure compliance with this condition prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy. Based upon the foregoing findings, staff is recommending that the conditional use permit be approved with appropriate conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: I. SITE PLAN REVIEW "The Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan Review #95-14 as shown on the site plan received July 5, 1995, subject to the following conditions: 1. The materials used to screen the trash enclosure shall be the same type of brick used on the building. 2. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting any signage on site. Provide a detailed sign plan for review and approval. 3. The applicant shall provide a meandering berm with landscaping along the parameters of the site. The height of the berm shall be between 3 to 4 feet. Five more trees shall be planted along the west portion of the site and 6 trees along the southern edge from the city's approved primary or secondary deciduous. The applicant shall also provide staff with a detailed cost estimate of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees. These guarantees must be posted prior to filing the plat. 4. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the city and provide the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping. 5. Fire Marshal conditions (Refer to attachment #2 for detailed policies): a. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #04-1991 - "Notes on Site Plan," copy enclosed. b. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #07-1991 "Pre Fire Plan Policy," copy enclosed. Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 15 c. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #29-1992 "Premises Identification," copy enclosed. d. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #36-1994 "Combination Domestic/Fire Sprinkler Supply Line," copy enclosed. e. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #40-1994 "Fire Sprinkler System," copy enclosed. f. Install and Indicate on plan a post indicator value (P.I.V.) on 6" water service. Location must be approved by the Fire Marshal. g. Install 2 "No Parking Fire Lane" signs at entrance to parking lot. Contact Fire Marshal for exact location. h. Building and attic space must be fire sprinklered per NFPA 13-1991 Edition. i. Water main may not pass under the building. 6. The applicant shall provide details on material colors used on the building for review and approval. 7. Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards shall be submitted. 8. Building Official's Conditions: a. Provide recycling space as required by Minnesota State Building Code 1300.4700. Demonstration of compliance may be provided on construction documents. b. Dispose of existing foundation at an approved landfill. Any roof top equipment should be screened from views. 9. No berming or landscaping will be allowed within any street right-of-way. 10. Existing wells and/or septic systems on site will have to be properly abandoned. 11. Another curb cut for driveway access should be incorporated into the site plan to improve traffic circulation." Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 16 II. SUBDIVISION "The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision #95- 14 for McGlynn Park 2nd Addition as shown on plat received July 5, 1995, with the following conditions: 1. Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance. 2. Enter into a development contract with the city. 3. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of the development contract. 4. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc-mulched or wood-fiber blanket or sod within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. All catch basins shall be protected with silt fence or hay bales until the parking lot is paved. 5. The applicant shall construct McGlynn Road and install public utilities along McGlynn Road to the west property line of the site. All utility and street improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the latest edition of the City's Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed street and utility plans and specifications shall be submitted for staff review and City Council approval. 6. The applicant shall provide detailed pre-developed and post-developed stormwater calculations for a 10-year and 100-year storm event, 24-hour duration. Individual storm sewer calculations between each catch basin segment will also be required to determine if sufficient catch basins are being utilized. 7. The applicant shall provide to the city written documentation by a qualified wetland delineator stating that there are no wetlands on the site. 8. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e. Carver County, Watershed District, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Health Department, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. 9. The proposed industrial development of 1.15 developable acres is responsible for a water quantity connection charge of $5,014 less any previous storm sewer assessment Children's World Learning Center August 2, 1995 Page 17 paid for the Audubon Road improvements. The water quality connection charge shall be waived. The water quantity fee is payable to the City prior to the City filing the final plat. 10. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during construction and shall re-locate or abandon the drain tile as directed by the City Engineer." III. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT "The Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit #95-2 subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with conditions of site plan and plat approval. 2. Obtain all applicable state, county, and city licenses." ATTACHMENTS 1. Memo from Diane Desotelle, Water Resource Engineer, and Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer, dated July 26, 1994. 2. Memo from Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal, dated July 19, 1995. 3. Memo from Steve Kirchman dated July 25, 1995. 4. Memo from Jill Sinclair, dated July 24, 1995. 5. Plans received July 5, 1995. CITY OF CHANHASSEN690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Generous, Planner II FROM: Diane Desotelle, Water Resources Coordinator David Hempel, Assistant City Engineer"- a/J- DATE: July 26, 1995 SUBJ: Children's World Learning Center 95-14 SUB, 95-14 Site Plan, and 95-2 CUP Land Use File No. 95-26 Upon review of the revised preliminary plat drawings prepared by Schoell and Madson, Inc. and date June 29, 1995 we offer the following comments and recommendations: WETLANDS There do not appear to be wetlands on the parcel, however, staff does need verification from the applicant on this issue. GRADING The entire site is proposed to be graded and leveled off for the building and parking lot. The site ranges from 983.0 in the southwest corner of the lot to 968.0 in the northeast corner. The building is proposed to be approximately 7 feet higher than Audubon Road. The proposed grading will require removal of the existing trees on the site. McGlynn Road as proposed is a paper street. The right-of-way was platted with the first phase of McGlynn Park. The street (McGlynn Road) will need to be upgraded to full City standards in conjunction with this development proposal. DRAINAGE The site drains naturally to the easterly side of the property out to Audubon Road. The grading proposes maintaining the existing drainage pattern. The front parking lot will drain to proposed catch basins in the parking lot. Storm sewer will need to be extended from Audubon Road along McGlynn Drive to service this site. The plans propose a low area and a catch basin to convey Robert Generous July 26, 1995 Page 2 runoff from the west side of the building south of the parking lot. This could be a potential problem for the children playing in the area. Staff recommends creating a drainage swale outside of the children's play area along the westerly property line which will require grading into the outlot. This will provide a safe and dry area for the children's tot lot. Storm sewer calculations for a 10-year and 100-year storm event of 24-hour duration shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final plat approval. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP1 The City has adopted a Surface Water Management Plan(SWMP) that serves as a tool to protect, preserve and enhance water resources. The plan identifies, from a regional perspective,the storm water quantity and quality improvements necessary to allow future development to take place and minimize its impact to downstream water bodies. In general, the water quantity portion of the plan uses a 100-year design storm interval for ponding and a 10-year design storm interval for storm sewer piping. The water quality portion of the plan uses William Walker, Jr.'s Pondnet model for predicting phosphorus concentrations in shallow water bodies. An ultimate conditions model has been developed at each drainage area based on the projected future land use, and therefore, different sets of improvements under full development were analyzed to determine the optimum phosphorus reduction in priority water bodies. Storm Water Quality and Associated Fees The SWMP has established a water quality connection charge for each new subdivision based on land use. Dedication shall be equal to the cost of land and pond volume needed for treatment of the phosphorus load leaving the site. The requirement for cash in lieu of land and pond construction shall be based upon a schedule in accordance with the prescribed land use zoning. Values are calculated using market values of land in the City of Chanhassen plus a value of $2.50 per cubic yard for excavation of the pond. A regional stormwater quality pond is located south of the Pillsbury facility just north of the railroad tracks which pretreats stormwater runoff from the Pillsbury site and Audubon Road. The proposed SWMP water quality charge for industrial development such as this is $2,507 per acre. Since this parcel will be served by the storm sewer from Audubon Road the City's surface water quality connection fees should be waived if the applicant extends the storm sewer through the site to the westerly property line along McGlynn Road. Storm Water Quantity and Associated Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average city-wide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. • Robert Generous July 26, 1995 Page 3 Industrial developments will have a storm water quantity connection charge of $4,360 per developable acre. The total developable area of the property is 1.15 acres; therefore, the proposed development would then be responsible for a water quantity connection charge of $5,014. This parcel may have previously been assessed for Audubon Road improvements such as storm sewer. Therefore,the connection charge should be re-evaluated and reduced accordingly based on previous storm sewer assessments. Staff will review the water quality connection fees based on the final construction plans and the previous assessments for this parcel from Audubon Road. EROSION CONTROL An erosion control plan has been incorporated into the grading and drainage plan. Staff finds the plan in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook for erosion control measures. All disturbed areas shall be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to prevent erosion and sedimentation. Protection around catch basins such as hay bales or silt fence is also required until the pavement is installed. UTILITIES Back in 1988, Phase I of Audubon Road (McGlynn Park) was constructed. Phase II of the development which was never constructed included McGlynn Road (looped street). In conjunction with Audubon Road construction, utility stubouts were extended in the direction of McGlynn Road for future extension. In order to service this development, utilities will need to be extended along McGlynn Road to the west property line (approximately 200 feet). Extension of the utility improvements is typically done by the applicant/developer. The applicant may petition the City to install the utilities and construct the street; however, the City's bonding capacity is limited as well as the number of projects that are in front of this will not allow construction until at least 1997 or later. In addition, the project would have to be expanded to include additional properties. The City cannot legally order a public improvement project for the sole interest of one property owner. If the applicant installs the utility improvements they will receive credit from the City for the oversizing costs of the utility lines. The credit could be applied to existing assessments against the parcel. Credit would be given for the cost difference between an 8-inch watermain and the proposed 10-inch watermain. The applicant will be required to enter into a development contract for construction of the public street and utility improvements and to guarantee compliance with the conditions of approval. Detailed construction plans and specifications in accordance with City standards will be required for staff review and formal City Council approval in conjunction with final plat consideration. Robert Generous July 26, 1995 Page 4 STREETS The site borders Audubon Road on the east and McGlynn Road on the north. Access to the site is proposed from McGlynn Road. The street does not exist at this time but there is public right- of-way dedicated to the City. The street was proposed to be constructed under the Phase II development plan of the McGlynn Park proposal. Construction plans and specifications were prepared but never executed. Without upgrading McGlynn Road to full City industrial standards (36 feet wide face-to-face), the site does not have access due to grade differences along Audubon Road and therefore, should be considered premature in development. Access to the site is proposed through one curb cut on McGlynn Road. Staff is concerned with the lack of parking area and proper circulation through the site based on the land use. The plans indicate 16 employees and up to 146 children occupying the area. The parking lot is providing 26 spaces which meets the ordinance but that leaves approximately only 10± spaces for drop-off and pick-up which seems low given the proposed land use. Another concern staff has is with the circulation in the parking lot. With only one access buses will not be able to turn around and cars coming and going will be limited to one ingress/egress point. Staff believes another access point should be added on the east end of the parking lot on McGlynn Road approximately 90 feet west of the intersection of Audubon Road and McGlynn Road. RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS 1. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc-mulched or wood-fiber blanket or sod within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. All catch basins shall be protected with silt fence or hay bales until the parking lot is paved. 2. The applicant shall construct McGlynn Road and install public utilities along McGlynn Road to the west property line of the site. All utility and street improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the latest edition of the City's Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed street and utility plans and specifications shall be submitted for staff review and City Council approval. 3. The applicant shall provide detailed pre-developed and post-developed stormwater calculations for a 10-year and 100-year storm event, 24-hour duration. Individual storm sewer calculations between each catch basin segment will also be required to determine if sufficient catch basins are being utilized. Robert Generous July 26, 1995 Page 5 4. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of the development contract. 5. The applicant shall provide to the city written documentation by a qualified wetland delineator stating that there are no wetlands on the site. 6. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e. Carver County, Watershed District, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Health Department, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. 7. No berming or landscaping will be allowed within any street right-of-way. 8. Existing wells and/or septic systems on site will have to be properly abandoned. 9. The proposed industrial development of 1.15 developable acres is responsible for a water quantity connection charge of $5,014 less any previous storm sewer assessment paid for the Audubon Road improvements. The water quality connection charge shall be waived. The water quantity fee is payable to the City prior to the City filing the final plat. 10. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during construction and shall re-locate or abandon the drain tile as directed by the City Engineer. 11. Another curb cut for driveway access should be incorporated into the site plan to improve traffic circulation. ktm/jms c: Charles Folch, Director of Public Works g:''eng4fiane\plannin ekidworld.pc CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Generous, ALCP Planner II FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal DATE: July 19, 1995 SUBJ: McGlynn Drive & Audubon Road Children's Learning World PLANNING CASE: 95-14 SUB, 95-14 Site Plan and 95-2 CUP I have reviewed the site plan in order to comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division,and have the following fire code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The site plan review was based on the available information submitted at this time. As additional plans or changes are submitted, the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. 1. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #04-1991 - "Notes on Site Plan", copy enclosed. 2. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #07-1991 "Pre Fire Plan Policy", copy enclosed. 3. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy#29-1992 "Premises Identification", copy enclosed. 4. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #36-1994 "Combination Domestic/Fire Sprinkler Supply Line", copy enclosed. 5. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #40-1994 "Fire Sprinkler System", copy enclosed. 6. Install and Indicate on plan a post indicator value (P.I.V.) on 6" water service. Location must be approved by the Fire Marshal. Children's Learning World Fire Department Site Plan Review July 19, 1995 Page 2 7. Install 2 "No Parking Fire Lane" signs at entrance to parking lot. Contact Fire Marshal for exact location. 8. Building and attic space must be fire sprinklered per NFPA 13-1991 Edition. 9. Water main may not pass under the building. g:\safenyinhchu tea.plr z_ CITY QF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 �-� (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES TO BE INCLUDED ON ALL SITE PLANS 1. Fire Marshal must witness the flushing of underground sprinkler service line, per NFPA 13-8-2.1. 2. A final inspection by the Fire Marshal before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 3. Fire Department access roads shall be provided on site during all phases of construction. The construction of these temporary roads will conform with the Chanhassen Fire Department requirements for temporary access roads at construction sites. Details are available. 4. Onsite fire hydrants shall be provided and in operating condition during all phases of construction. 5. The use of liquefied petroleum as shall be in conformance with NFPA Standard 58 and the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. A list of these requirements is available. (See policy #33-1993) 6. All fire detection and fire suppression systems shall be monitored by an approved UL central station with a UL 71 Certificate issued on these systems before final occupancy is issued. 7. An 11" x 14" As Built shall be provided to the Fire Department. The As Built shall be reproducible and acceptable to the Fire Marshal. (See policy #07-1991). 8. An approved lock box shall be provided on the building for fire department use. The lock box should be located by the Fire Department connection or as located by the Fire Marshal. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991 Date: 11/22/91 Revised: 12/23/94 Page 1 of 2 9. Hieh-piled combustible storage shall comply with the requirements of Article#81 of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. High-piled combustible storage is combustible materials on closely packed piles more than 15' in height or combustible materials on pallets or in racks more than 12' in height. For certain special-hazard commodities such as rubber tires,plastics, some flammable liquids, idle pallets, etc. the critical pile height may be as low as 6 feet. 10. Fire lane signage shall be provided as required by the Fire Marshal. (See policy #06-1991). 11. Smoke detectors installed in lieu of 1 hour rated corridors under UBC section 3305G, Exception#5 shall comply with Chanhassen Fire Department requirements for installation and system type. (See policy #05-1991). 12. Maximum allowed size of domestic water service on a combination domestic/fire sprinkler supply line policy must be followed. (See policy #36-1994). Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991 Date: 11/22/91 _ c . . V -__ Revised: 12/23/94 Approved - Public Safety Director Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 r '`• (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY REGARDING PRE-PLAN Prior to issuing the C .O. , a pre-plan, site plan shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval . The following items shall be shown on the plan. 1) Size 11 " x 17 " (maximum) 2 ) Building footprint and building dimensions 3 ) Fire lanes and width of fire lanes 4) Water mains and their sizes, indicate looped or dead end 5) Fire hydrant locations 6) P. I .V. - Fire Department connection 7) Gas meter (shut-off) , NSP (shut off) 8) Lock box location 9) Fire walls, if applicable 10) Roof vents, if applicable 11) Interior walls 12 ) Exterior doors 13 ) Location of fire alarm panel 14) Sprinkler riser location 15) Exterior L . P . storage, if applicable 16) Haz . Mat . storage, if applicable 17) Underground storage tanks locations, if applicable 18) Type of construction walls/roof 19) Standpipes PLEASE NOTE : Plans with topographical information, contour lines, easement lines, property lines, setbacks, right-of-way lines, headings, and other related lines or markings, are not acceptable, and will be rejected. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #07-1991 Date: 01/16/91 Revised: 02/18/94 Approved - Public Safety Director Page 1 of 1 4,1 CITY OF -F/-STe-';..1, kl";r01./ -.----.• _... cHAN .,..,..: ,._100 : 11 \ , -1 . • t"' .44,5-,- .1.s `•- 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 j. '"' (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY PREMISES IDENTIFICATION General Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall be approved by one of the following - Public Safety Director, Building Official, Building Inspector, Fire Marshal . Requirements are for new construction and existing buildings where no address numbers are posted. ,;� 4% Other Reculrements-General 1. Numbers shall be a contrasting color from the background. 2. Numbers shall not be in script • 3. If a structure is not visible from the street,additional numbers are required at the driveway entrance. Size and location must be approved. 4. Numbers on mall box at driveway entrance may be a minimum of 4". However, requirement #3 must still be met. 5. Administrative authority may require additional numbers If deemed necessary. Residential Requlrernerrts(2 or less dwelling unit) 1. Minimum height shall be 5 1/4". 2. Building permits will not be flnaled unless numbers are posted and approved by the Building Department. Commercial Requirements 1. Minimum height shall be 12". 2. Strip Malls a. Multi tenant building will have minimum height requirements of 6". b. Address numbers shall be on the main entrance and on all back doors. 3. If address numbers are located on a directory entry sign, additional numbers will be required on the buildings main entrance. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #29-1992 / - Date: 06/15/92 Revised: Approved - Public Salty Director Page 1 of 1 + PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF \ ,:ift CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 -N"\r, ' , `.- (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROTECTIVE INSPECTION DIVISION POLICY MAXIMUM ALLOWED SIZE OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ON A COMBINATION DOMESTIC/FIRE SPRINKLER SUPPLY LINE 1. Domestic water line shall not be greater than 1/4 pipe size of the combination service water supply line. 2. 1 1/2" domestic off 6" line 3. 2" domestic off 8" line 4. 2 1/2 domestic off 10" line Option 1: Domestic sizes may be increased if it can be calculated hydraulically that the demand by all domestic fixtures will not drop the fire sprinkler water below its minimum gallonage required. Option 2: Combination domestic and five line service shall have an electric solenoid valve installed on the domestic side of the service. This valve shall be normally powered open and close on loss of electric power or signal from the system water flow indicator. Must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Mechanical Inspector. Chanhassen Fire Department Water Line Sizing / Policy #36-1994 Date: 06/10/94 cu�' �% Revised: Approved - P 'lie Safety Director Page 1 of 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN n-i 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 �-f \ (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 1. Permits are required for all sprinkler work. 2. A minimum of four sets of plans are required. Send, or drop off plans and specifications and calculations to: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 3. Yard post indicators are required and must have tamper protection. 4. All control values must be provided with tamper protection. 5. All systems tests must be witnessed by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal. Appointments can be made by calling the Fire Marshal at 937-1900, ext. 132, between 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Please try to arrange tests at least 24 hours in advance. All revisions of 25 heads or more will require a test. 6. Main drains & inspector test connections must be piped to the outside atmosphere. 7. Water may not be introduced into sprinkler piping from the City main until the Fire Marshal witnesses a flush test per NFPA 13-8-2.1. 8. The City of Chanhassen has adopted Appendix E (see 1305.6905 appendix chapter 38 of the MBC). Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Policy #40-1995 Date: 01/12/95 Revised: 04/26/95 Page 1 of 2 9. All systems must be designed to NFPA-13, 1991 edition and Chapter 6 Standards. All attic systems are to be spaced at a maximum 130 square foot coverage. 3/4" plastic piping will no be allowed at any time in attic space. 10. All equipment installed in a fire protection system shall be UL listed or factory mutual approved for fire protection service. 11. Fire protection systems that are hydraulically calculated shall have a 5 psi safety factor at maximum system flow. 12. Acceptable water supplies for fire sprinkler systems are listed in NFPA-13, 1991 ed., Chapter 7. Swimming pools and ponds are not acceptable primary water supplies. 13. Pressure and gravity tanks shall be sized per the requirements contained in NFPA-13 and 22. Duration of the water supply shall match the hazard classification of the occupancy. 14. Include spec sheets for fire sprinkler heads - dry pipe/pre-action valving. 15. The definition of inspection is contained in MN Rule 7512.0100 Subpart 10, and states that inspection means: 1. Conducting a final acceptance test. 2. Trip test of dry pipe, deluge or preaction valves. 3. A test that an authority having jurisdiction requires to be conducted under the supervision of a contractor. Only licensed fire protection contractors are permitted to conduct these tests. 4. All other inspections including the inspectors test, main drain and other valves are permitted under MN Rule 7512.0400 Subpart-2G, as maintenance activities and do not require a license as a fire protection contractor. 16. Per Section 904.3.2. and the 1994 Uniform Building Code, an approved audible sprinkler flow alarm to alert the occupants shall be provided in the interior of the building in a normally occupied location. (Location must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal). Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Policy #40-1995 Date: 01/12/95 Revised: 04/26/95 Approved-Public Safety Director Page: 2 of 2 CITY OF ClIANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Generous, Planner II 4q-jç. FROM: Steve A. Kirchman, Building Official DATE: July 25, 1995 SUBJECT: 95-14 SUB, 95-14 SPR and 95-2 CUP ( Children's World Learning Center, Inc.) I was asked to review the site plan proposal stamped "CITY OF CHANHASSEN, RECEIVED, JUL 05 1995, CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT. " for the above referenced project. Analysis; Recycling Space. Current state statutes require that recycling space be provided for all new buildings. The area of the recycling space must be dedicated at the rate specified in Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) 1300.4700 Subp. 5. The applicant should demonstrate the required area will be provided in addition to the space required for other solid waste collection space. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. Existing Foundation. The existing foundation must be disposed of off site at an approved landfill Recommendations; 1. Provide recycling space as required by Minnesota State Building Code 1300.4700. Demonstration of compliance may be provided on construction documents. 2. Dispose of existing foundation at an approved landfill. I would like to request that you relay to the developers and designers my desire to meet with them as early as possible to discuss commercial building permit requirements. gAsafely\sannemos\plan,ch ildren.bg I t!.,_ . C QTY OF CHANIIASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 I MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmin Al-Jaff, Planner H FROM: Jill Sinclair, Forestry Intern DATE: July 24, 1995 SUBJ: Tree Preservation/Removal, Children's World Learning Centers Applicant's site has an existing woods covering .67 acres (58%) of the 1.15 acre lot. The woods are a mix of native species including elm, ash, cottonwood, and boxelder. Generally, it is a young woods with 2 special trees, a 28 inch elm and a 24 inch boxelder, within it. Considering the proposed plans, it would be not be possible to preserve those trees. Applicant is required to preserve a minimum canopy area of 20% or .23 acres. The applicant has proposed to remove all existing vegetation. Code requires a replacement plantings of 1.2 times the amount of require canopy being removed. The applicant must provide 11 trees of replacement plantings as well as 9 trees to meet the 20% minimum canopy area. The parking lot also requires a total of 3 trees to meet minimum code requirement. At a minimum, 23 trees would be required for this development. The applicant's landscape plan lists 27 trees to be planted on site. However, staff recommends more trees be planted in play area of the development. Increased plantings along the western edge would not only screen future neighboring developments, but also provide increased shade for the play area in the summer and protection from westerly winds and sun. Recommendations: 1. Increase tree plantings along southern half of western edge of site. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1 1 A/KE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ' ANN Wednesday, August 2, 1995 PAR. at 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers 690 Coulter Drive ~ ARBORS UM n BOULEVARD "CSP 11117.EP Project: Children's World Learning Center f Developer. Children's World Learning Center, Inc. LOCATI . sdA Location: McGlynn Drive and Audubon 11111111 Road Notice: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a development proposed in your area. The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval subdividing Oudot B, McGlynn Park Addition, an 8.79 acre parcel, into one lot of 1.15 acres and one outlot of 7.64 acres; site plan review of an 8,044 sq. ft. building and a conditional use permit for a day care center on property zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park, and located at McGlynn Drive and Audubon Road, Children's World Learning Center, Inc. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an over view of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The Commission will then make a recommendation to the City Council. Questions or Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob at 937-1900, ext. 141. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 20, 1995 1� J � L c� Shamrock Property Partners McGlynn Bakeries, Inc. Hi-Way 5 Partnership 7350 Commerce Lane c/o Grant Met Tax Dept. c/o Dennis Dirlam Fridley, MN 55432 200 So. 6th Street MS 1843 15241 Creekside Ct. Minneapolis, MN 55402 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Heritage Development of MN PRN Music Corporation Alfred Iverson 450 E. County Road D 7801 Audubon Road PMT Corporation St. Paul, MN 55117 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1500 Park Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 I ) ) 1 ) ) CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JULY 19, 1995 Chairwoman Mancino called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Ladd Conrad, Craig Peterson, Mike Meyer, Nancy Mancino, Bob Skubic, and Jeff Farmakes MEMBERS ABSENT: Ron Nutting STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Planning Director; Sharmin Al-Jaff, Planner II; Bob Generous, Planner II; and Dave Hempel, Asst. City Engineer PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT TO SUBDIVIDE 5.98 ACRES INTO 5 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LOCATED AT 7530 DOGWOOD ROAD, GETSCH ADDITION, GETSCH CORPORATION. Public Present: Name Address David Getsch 5233 Richwood Drive Marjorie & William Getsch 7530 Dogwood Road John Getsch 18022 Priory Lane, Minnetonka Shamir' Al-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Mancino: Thank you. Are there any questions for staff at this time? Can we just turn very quickly. The underlying zoning is RSF. Al-Jaff: Correct. Mancino: But the comprehensive plan guided this for large lots. Al-Jaff: Correct. Mancino: And we go back to the zoning because the zoning predates comprehensive plan? Al-Jaff: And takes precedence. Mancino: Takes precedence over the comprehensive plan. 1 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Al-Jaff: Correct. Mancino: Thank you. Any other questions for staff? Does the applicant or their designee wish to address the Planning Commission? Thank you. John Getsch: My name is John Getsch and I currently reside in Minnetonka and I'm the designated representative of the Getsch Corporation. I had a couple of questions on the conditions. First of all I'd like to go to what originally, how we got to this situation. Originally the land was bought, I think it was in '78 with the intention of buying 7 lots for the purpose of building homes for family. My parents bought it. They built a house there and one of my brothers built a house there. There's 4 brothers in the family. Each one of us was designated to get a lot and we were going to basically subdivide the lots, you know divide it up so there would be 5 lots. Two homes, year round homes have been built. There was an original cabin that was on the property, which is basically been unchanged other than to be just maintained. In the past we were operating under the assumption that they were 7 lots and being treated as 7 lots. The city was also acting under that in granting building permits for houses. Garages on the property. This came about last, I think about a year ago that we found out that in essence it is one piece of property with two single family homes and a... In going through and looking at what would be the best solution for, to get basically a non- compliance parcel into a complying parcel, working with the Planning Commission, we came up with dividing it into 5 lots, which does solve the issue of basically 5 interests in the corporation and the reason for it originally was to have a, to be able to provide the land equally into 5 lots. That's the whole reason the corporation was originally set up. The intent never was to buy the land, hold it and use it as a subdivision. It was to be to buy the land for the use of putting our homes on them. We support the planning staffs recommendations going through. We do have some questions on a couple of the items and asking for some clarification. The first one would be item 2 on page 6 of the report. It says private driveway and street shall be upgraded to meet city ordinances, and my question is, right now we're not planning on doing anything and we really don't want to go through and do a lot of work redoing the roads in there. And I guess we're wondering would this be, when anything is changed on the property, in other words a building permit be issued, then the roads would have to be brought up to the recommendations for use for a private drive. Hopefully a private drive. Mancino: It would not be until there was a building permit issued. So I think that would be good to add to this recommendation. John Getsch: The next item that I had was item 7, which is a Fire Marshal's condition and in essence that's kind of the same thing. We're modifying when the road, or the driveway gets 2 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 modified and it would need to meet that. Would that also be upon condition of granting a building permit in the future? Mancino: It is my understanding of that. Is that correct Sharmin and Dave? Hempel: Madam Chair, if I can address that for one moment. I guess the concern I would have is should the property change hands before a building permit has been issued, then who would be responsible for the upgrade of that driveway. Who pays for it? If it stays in the sole ownership of the Getsch Corporation or whoever, then we'd have them to go to. That's the only question I have. One way to do it would be to provide some sort of security to guarantee that that does get upgraded in the future. Typically these driveways are upgraded when the plat is recorded. So you have a driveway at that time already. A building permit can be pulled the next day. Mancino: Okay. And couldn't it be, can't we just award that legally so that the present owners at the time of the upgrade have the financial responsibility? Hempel: We could address that I believe through a development contract through the subdivision. That the costs that are born by the original property owner. John Getsch: The plan really is at the time, you know many of the lots are, would be separated out for the purpose of building, or sold off, that there would be a road in place that would meet all the requirements. In essence we really couldn't sell the lots without doing that. If you look at the plat right now you'll see that the present driveway comes down right through the middle of the lots so to really do anything with any of them, that has to be addressed. That was all that I, you know in reading through it that I had some questions on. And again, we support the... Mancino: Excuse me, any other questions? John Getsch: No. Do you have any questions of me? Mancino: Any questions? Thank you. May I have a motion to open this for a public hearing. Faimakes moved, Meyer seconded to open the public hewing. All voted in favor and the motion canied. The public hewing was opened. Mancino: Does anyone wish to address the Planning Commission on this issue? Seeing none, may I have a motion to close the public hearing? 3 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Meyer moved, Farmakes seconded to close the public healing. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The public healing was closed. Mancino: Commissioners. Jeff? Farmakes: I have no comments. Mancino: Okay. Bob. Skubic: I have no comments either. Mancino: Okay. Mike. Meyer: As long as we can get the street issue resolved, that's what I'm concerned. About the timing on that. Other than that, nothing. Mancino: Craig. Peterson: That'd be my only question too. How difficult is it to write it into, if there is a change of ownership, how difficult really is it to write that into the contract upon sale? Mancino: I think we may want to add that to our list of recommendations. Ladd. Conrad: It looks fine. Mancino: I just have one and that is, as I went over and walked the property and the area which is very, very unique, I'm wondering from staffs point of view, we're adding two new houses. I mean two houses to this private drive and it's 10 feet at this point, is that correct Sharmin? Al-Jaff: 10 to 14 feet. Mancino: 10 feet and we're asking a property owner to make that 20 feet in through there and I don't know if everyone else has a chance to walk through that area but the road itself right now is very close to some of the existing homes and also is surrounded by fairly big specimen trees, and is there another way, a more creative way to keep the road the same width and, Dave I guess I'm kind of addressing this to you in saying that maybe the two new homes that are going in there have to have. I know the concern is for public safety and buyer concern, that those two new homes, instead of widening the road, have to have those interior 4 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 sprinkler systems. Are there any other ways to look at this to maintain the character of the area and keep the road the way it is and yet have some assurances? Hempel: I believe the alternative that you suggested there is a viable one. The Fire Marshal has gone along with that in the past. The expense of something like that is pretty substantial. That's up to the property owner to elect to do that. The other option would be to see if there is another feasible route for a driveway to meander through the woods to leave the existing driveway in place and connect onto it later probably. Mancino: Okay. So that is an option. I have no idea if the applicant would like to consider that option but I think it's one that we could put in the recommendations and have staff and the applicant work through that with public safety. My last question is, these lots have riparian rights to Lake Minnewashta and they have to show two proposed ISTS sites. Sharmin, how far do they need to be from Lake Minnewashta? Al-Jaff: 75 feet from the ordinary high water mark. Mancino: Okay. So there won't be any leeching or, thank you. That's all the questions and comments I have. Enough said. May I have a motion? Farmakes: I'll make a motion that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approve the preliminary plat for Subdivision #95-11 dated July 19, 1995 for Getsch, is that it? John Getsch: Getsch. Farmakes: Getsch Addition for 5 single family lots as shown on the plans dated June 19, 1995, subject to the following conditions. 1 through 9 and how would you like to word 2 on that? Do you want to add your condition onto that for legal responsibility for upgrading? Mancino: A friendly amendment would be to, on number 2, the private driveway/street shall be upgraded to meet city ordinances at time of, when they pull a building permit. And secondly, also that there is a second option of, if the applicant and city staff review a second option of keeping the road the way it is and using a sprinkler system or something that meets safety fire code for the two new homes. And this is to be worked out with city staff and the applicant. Farmakes: Work with staff? Okay. That's fine. Mancino: Do I hear a second to the motion? 5 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Skubic: I'll second. Mancino: Any discussion? Faimakes moved, Skubic seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat for Subdivision #95-11 for Getsch Addition for 5 single family lots as shown on the plans dated June 19, 1995, subject to the following conditions: 1. Tree Removal Limits will be established 15 feet from building pad and grading limits. The locations of trees must be shown on site surveys submitted for building permits. Any additional tree removals must have staff approval. 2. The private driveway/street shall be upgraded to meet city ordinances at the time building permits are issued. The applicant and city staff will review a second option of keeping the road the way it is and using a sprinkler system or something that meets safety fire code for the two new homes. 3. The preliminary grading plan should be revised to include the following information: a. Show primary and secondary septic site locations. b. Show the revised private driveway including turn around. c. Final grading plan should be signed by a licensed land surveyor or professional engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. 4. The applicant shall provide a cross access driveway easement agreement to preserve access through the proposed lots and to spell out maintenance responsibilities. 5. All areas disturbed during site grading shall be immediately restored with seed and disc- mulched or wood fiber blanket within two weeks of completing site grading unless the city's (BMPH) planting dates dictate otherwise. All areas disturbed with slopes of 3:1 or greater shall be restored with sod or seed and wood fiber blanket. 6. Building Department conditions: a. Show the location of two proposed ISTS sites. This must be done before final plat approval. b. Demonstrate the existing ISTS's are not failing or non-complying systems. 6 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 c. Show existing and proposed well locations on the proposed five lots, and existing well location on lots abutting the proposed subdivision. Revise Grading and Drainage Plan to indicate lowest floor level elevation, top of foundation elevation and garage floor elevation. This should be done prior to final plat approval. 7. Fire Marshal conditions: a. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. These plans shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Marshal. 8. Full park and trail fees shall be collected per city ordinance in lieu of land acquisition and/or trail construction. 9. A preservation easement over the westerly 150 feet of Lots 1 and 2 shall be dedicated. All voted in favor and the motion canied unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING OF 20.25 ACRES FROM A2, AGRICULTURAL ESTATE TO RSF, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY AND PRELIMINARY PLAT TO SUBDIVIDE 20.25 ACRES INTO 18 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND 1 OUTLOT LOCATED AT 7210 GALPIN BOULEVARD, FOREST MEADOW. Public Present: Name Address John Sullivan 2346 Stone Creek Drive Jeffry Finch 2304 Stone Creek Drive Randy Lewis 2181 Stone Creek Drive Shaimin Al-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Mancino: Any questions for staff at this time? Conrad: Yes. The access to the property, it's referenced as access to the park. I don't understand that. 7 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Al-Jaff: The applicant is proposing to extend this street, which is Fawn Hills Road, to the south and then cul-de-sac it. There are parcels that are developable at some time in the future. Staff is recommending that this street be stubbed to the south and then end it at that point to provide future access. Mancino: And there will still be, there will be an access to the park off Galpin. Al-Jaff: Correct. Mancino: And the existing house that is there, the Stockdale house will still have their own driveway? Al-Jaff: Correct. Mancino: Okay. So they'll be those two. Sharmin, the parcel to the south, the Turcott parcel. Al-Jaff: Would you please repeat? Mancino: The parcel to the south, how many acres is that? The Turcott property. Al-Jaff: It's approximately 5 acres. Mancino: Thank you. Any other questions for staff at this time? Thank you. Does the applicant or their designee wish to address the Planning Commission? Please do. Would you like to bring that forward a little. Please. Dave Sevold: I'm Dave Sevold. I'm the Development Director for JMS Company. We're the applicant. We are located in Chanhassen. 80 West 78th Street. I'm very pleased to submit this proposal to the city. Basically we feel we've come up with a plan that utilizes the natural grades of the site. The existing road connection from the Lundgren Development in. We have met with the Turcott's, the...property to the south. She is the daughter-in-law of the Bentz', which are the rest of the owners of the property to the south of us. They indicated they have no desire for development on their property so our concern is that if we add a roadway section in here, we'll probably, we could wind up losing a lot. We're not sure how much it would benefit or cost at this time. Really that's basically our concern, but overall I think it's a really good plan. Any questions? Mancino: Any questions from commissioners? Thank you. May I have a motion to open this for a public hearing please? 8 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Peterson moved, Meyer seconded to open the public hewing. All voted in favor and the motion canied. The public hewing was opened. Mancino: This is open for a public hearing. Does anyone wish to come up and address the Planning Commission at this time? Seeing none, may I have a motion to close the public hearing? Conrad moved, Meyer seconded to close the public hewing. All voted in favor and the motion canied. The public hewing was closed. Mancino: Comments from commissioners. Bob? Skubic: I don't have any issue with this. I'd just like to say that, I do feel that the access to the properties to the south is advisable. I agree with that. At some point in the future there may be other owners in those areas at which time they may desire, it may be necessary to have access so I agree with that point. And that's all I have. Mancino: Thank you. Mike. Meyer: I agree with the staff recommendations. Mancino: Craig. Peterson: I agree with the staff recommendations also. Mancino: Ladd. Conrad: I really like the plan and I really wish I could figure out a way that we didn't have to stub in a street, but the land to the south will develop. We've heard this so many times that it won't, and it does. It does. It always does. So we have to have the access and I don't want to impact you in terms of number of houses but I think we need that access, so I agree with the staff report. Mancino: Any other comments Ladd? Conrad: No. Mancino: Jeff. 9 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Farmakes: I also agree with the staff report, unless something can be worked out otherwise, I think the land to the south...Ladd's comments. Quite a long cul-de-sac there also. That's it. Mancino: I have a couple comments, and that is, I really like the proposal, the preliminary plat in front of us. My only concern with putting a road to the south would be, I would like to conceptually keep it away from the park because I think it's pretty great in neighborhoods where you have little kids in parks and you have balls and you have people playing all over and there isn't a street that the ball runs into. People don't run into the street at all so my recommendation to be wherever the stub goes into the south, or wherever the staff feels with the applicant that it's appropriate, that it be away from the park, if at all possible. And especially because Galpin is going to become, and is such a heavy traffic collector road and it will become even more so that that's my concern. Now the other thing to look at is from the Benson property, if you could use that to tie everything in. I don't know. Instead of Turcott property. I hope I'm pronouncing their name correctly. My only other concern, again walking it is that on Lot 16 and 17, to the developer, that you have absolutely wonderful, big, the biggest that I've seen in Chanhassen, oak trees there and I would just ask that staff work with the applicant in saving some of those bigger ones, again that are specimen trees and that we add to recommendation 21. Lots 16 and 17, Block 1 should be custom graded at time of building permit issuance. Individual tree removal, tree protection fencing, grading, drainage and erosion control plans will be required for review and approval by the City prior to issuance of a building permit because I think the protection fencing will decide whether those trees live or not. And right now it has been graded in that area and there is no tree protection fencing so I would like to see that changed. Those are my only two. Oh, my third comment is, on 17. Recommendation 17. I'm not sure I understand Sharmin. If we have an ordinance that says you have to hook up if you're within 150 feet, and this house, the Stockdale house is within 190 feet, why are we making them hook up? Hempel: Madam Chairman, maybe I can address that. Typically with an urban subdivision such as this, we'd like to bring the area homes up to conformance with city codes, now that city sewer and water is available to the site. We've done on some other home sites, the applicant may have a fairly new septic system that's up to code. It meets today's codes. We've allowed variances to allow that resident to stay on the current septic system, as long as they bi-annually supply us with documentation that it's being properly maintained and operated. At such time that the septic system fails or the well fails, we require that the resident hook up to the city sewer and water at that time. That is an option here for the resident to do that. The resident should submit a letter to the city engineer requesting a variance for that. Mancino: Okay. So they do have that option? 10 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Hempel: Yes. Mancino: Okay, thank you. Any other questions or comments? Conrad: Yeah,just one of staff. There is no connection really between this development and the park, is there? Other than it backs up to it? Aanenson: Right. Conrad: So access for the residents would be also? Al-Jaff: Originally staff had recommended that a trail between those two homes would be created to allow residents to access the park. However, with the street stub to the south, it will be just, there will still be a trail between the street stub and the park that would allow that access. Conrad: I like that solution. Mancino: May I have a motion please? Meyer: I'll make a motion. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat for Subdivision #95-10, Forest Meadows for 18 single family lots and one outlot, as shown on the plans received June 19, 1995, subject to the following conditions 1 thru 21 with the amendment on number 21, inserting tree protection fencing between tree removal and grading. Conrad: I'll second that. Mancino: Thank you. Any discussion? Meyer moved, Conrad seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat for Subdivision #95-10, Forest Meadow for 18 single family lots and one outlot as shown on the plans received June 19, 1995, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with the City in developing a landscaping reforestation plan on the site. The landscaping plan shall include 63 trees to be planted on Lots 1-17. The vegetated areas which will not be affected by the development will be protected by a conservation easement. The applicant shall provide the city with a legal description of these easements. Staff shall provide a plan which shows the location of the conservation 11 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 easement and the applicant shall provide the legal description. A snow fence shall be placed along the edge of the tree preservation easements prior to grading. 2. Building Department conditions: a. Submit soil reports to the Inspection Division. This should be done prior to issuance of any building permits. b. Revise the Grading and Drainage Plan to show standard designations for dwelling. This should be done prior to final plat approval. 3. Fire Marshal conditions: a. Add one additional fire hydrant. Hydrant maximum spacing is 300 feet. The distance between hydrants located between Lots 3 and 4 and between Lots 6 and 7 is in excess of 500 feet. b. A ten foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e. street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, NSP, NW Bell, cable television, transformer boxes. This is to insure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. c. Street name is acceptable. d. Cul-de-sac inside turning radius must be 45 1/2 feet, not 42 feet as shown. 4. Park and Recreation conditions: a. The park be platted as an outlot in the general configuration shown on the proposed plat. b. The city shall compensate JMS Companies $24,000 per acre for the outlot at the time of sale. (The same compensation offered to Mr. Stockdale.) c. JMS Companies shall mass and finish grade the outlot per the city's plan at no cost to the city. d. All park and trail fees shall be waived for Forest Meadow. (These fees total $20,400 at current rates.) 12 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 e. JMS Companies shall administer all work relating to the construction of the park's trail loop, trail connection to Fawn Hill Road, entry road and parking lot. The city shall pay unit prices for the materials consumed in this construction. JMS Companies shall assume all "soft" costs associated with this work. JMS Companies shall secure a minimum of three competitive bids for this work. These bids shall be submitted to the city for review prior to selection of a contractor. f. The proposed trail easement shall be 20 feet in width and the outlot area shall be reconfigured to include no less than 5 acres of property. 5. The existing outbuildings and any septic system or wells on the site shall be abandoned in accordance with the City and/or State codes. 6. The applicant will need to develop a sediment and erosion control plan in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook and the Surface Water Management Plan requirements for new developments. The plan shall be submitted to the city for review and formal approval. Type III erosion control fence shall be used adjacent to the wetlands. A rock construction entrance shall be installed and maintained on Fawn Hill Road until the street is paved. Construction access to the site other than Fawn Hill Road is subject to approval by the City. 7. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc-mulched or wood-fiber blanket or sod within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. Other than one model home permit, no other building permit will be issued until the site grading is completed and the site re-seeded and mulched. 8. All utility and street improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the latest edition of the City's Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed street and utility plans and specifications shall be submitted for staff review and City Council approval. 9. The wetlands and wetland buffers shall be delineated on the grading and drainage plans. Wetland buffer areas shall be surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The City will install wetland buffer edge signs before accepting the utilities and will charge the applicant $20 per sign. 10. The applicant shall provide detailed storm sewer calculations for 10 year and 100 year storm events and provide ponding calculations for stormwater quality/quantity ponds in accordance with the City's Surface Water Management Plan for the City Engineer to review and approve. The applicant shall provide detailed pre-developed and post 13 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 developed stormwater calculations for 100 year storm events and normal water level and high water level calculations in existing basins, created basins, and/or creeks. Individual storm sewer calculations between each catch basin segment will also be required to determine if sufficient catch basins are being utilized. In addition, water quality ponding design calculations shall be based on Walker's Pondnet model. 11. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of the development contract. 12. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e. Carver County, Watershed District, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Health Department, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. 13. The appropriate drainage and utility easements should be dedicated on the final plat for all utilities and ponding areas lying outside the right-of-way. The easement width shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. Consideration shall also be given for access for maintenance of the ponding areas. 14. No berming or landscaping will be allowed within the right-of-way. 15. The lowest exposed floor or opening elevation of all buildings adjacent to the wetlands shall be a minimum of 3 feet above the 100 year high water level. 16. The proposed stormwater pond must have side slopes of 10:1 for the first ten feet at the normal water level and no more than 3:1 thereafter or 4:1 throughout for safety purposes. A landscape plan providing upland and wetland plants to naturally blend the pond into the surroundings is recommended. 17. The house at 7210 Galpin Boulevard shall be connected to city sanitary sewer within 30 days after the final plat has been recorded. The well may continue to be used until it fails, at which time the property shall connect to City water. 18. The proposed single family residential development of 13.3 developable acres is responsible for a water quantity connection charge of $26,334 and a water quality connection charge of $10,640. These fees will be fine tuned during the time of final plat since credits may be given if the applicant proposes to assist with the trunk system. The fees are payable to the City prior to the City filing the final plat. 14 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 19. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during construction and shall re-locate or abandon the drain tile as directed by the City Engineer. A drain tile system will need to be incorporated into the construction plans for those lots which are unable to discharge directly into either a storm sewer system or pond/wetland. 20. The applicant shall meet and resolve with the property owners to the south and City staff the placement of storm sewer facilities and extension of a street prior to final platting. 21. Lots 16 and 17, Block 1 shall be custom graded at time of building permit issuance. Individual tree removal, tree protection fencing, grading, drainage and erosion control plans will be required for review and approval by the City prior to issuance of a building permit. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously. Aanenson: Just for clarification. We're doing a rezoning and subdivision. Your motion just said subdivision so you might want to. Mancino: Okay. Let's redo that. Aanenson: Or do a separate motion for the rezoning. Mancino: Let's do, do you want to do a separate motion for the rezoning? Meyer: The Planning Commission recommends City Council approve Rezoning #95-4 REZ, 20.25 acres of property zoned A2 to RSF for Forest Meadow as shown on the plans received June 19, 1995 and subject to the following conditions 1 and 2. Mancino: Second? Peterson: Second. Meyer moved, Peterson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Rezoning (#95-4 REZ) 20.25 acres of property zoned A2 to RSF for Forest Meadow as shown on the plans received June 19, 1995 and subject to the following conditions: 15 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 1. The applicant shall enter into a development contract containing all of the conditions of approval for this project and shall submit all required financial guarantees. The development contract shall be recorded against the property. 2. The applicant shall meet all conditions of the Subdivision #95-10. All voted in favor and the motion canied unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL SUBDIVIDING LOT 3, BLOCK 1, SUNRIDGE ADDITION, AN 11.27 ACRE PARCEL INTO ONE LOT OF 2.62 ACRES AND AN OUTLOT OF 8.65 ACRES ON PROPERTY ZONED RR, RURAL RESIDENTIAL AND LOCATED AT 8950 AUDUBON ROAD, MARLIN EDWARDS. Public Present: Name Address Lois Degler 9111 Audubon Road Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Mancino: Thank you Bob. Any questions for staff at this point, from commissioners? No. Does the applicant or their designee wish to address the Planning Commission at this time? Is the applicant here? Generous: I haven't seen him. Mancino: Okay. Let's see, may I have a motion to open the public hearing? Conrad moved, Meyer seconded to open the public healing. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The public healing was opened. Mancino: This is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to address the Planning Commission at this time, please come up on this issue, if you'd like to. Conrad moved, Peterson seconded to close the public healing. All voted in favor and the motion canied. The public hewing was closed. 16 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Mancino: Ladd. Conrad: Nothing. Looks good. Mancino: Okay. Craig. Peterson: No questions. Meyer: Nothing. Skubic: No questions. Farmakes: No comment. Mancino: I don't have any either. May I have a motion? Skubic: I'll make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Subdivision #95-12, preliminary plat for one lot and one outlot dated 4/19/95 on 11.27 acres of land as shown on the plans prepared by Rieke, Carroll, Muller Associates, Inc. subject to the following conditions 1 through 5. Mancino: Do I hear a second? Meyer: Second. Mancino: Thank you. Any discussion? Skubic moved, Meyer seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Subdivision #95-12 approving the pi liminaiy plat for one lot and one outlot, as shown on the plans prepared by Rieke, Carroll, Muller Associates, Inc. dated 4/19/95 on 11.27 acres of land subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall dedicate a 50 foot wide right-of-way from the center of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard on the new plat. 2. The applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot trail easement outside of the right-of-way for Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard. 3. The applicant shall show the location of an alternate individual sewer treatment system (ISTS) site. This must be done prior to final plat approval. 17 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 4. The applicant shall designate the remainder of Lot 3, Block 1, Sunridge Addition as Outlot A. 5. The applicant shall designate this subdivision Sun Ridge 3rd Addition. All voted in favor and the motion canied unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT FROM OFFICE/ INDUSTRIAL TO RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY; REZONING FROM A2, AGRICULTURAL ESTATE TO RSF, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY; PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR 59 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND 2 OUTLOTS AND ASSOCIATED RIGHT-OF-WAY ON 46.27 ACRES; AND WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT TO FILL WETLANDS ON-SITE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8470 GALPIN BLVD. (THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GALPIN BLVD. AND LYMAN BLVD.), SOUTHERN OAKS, SCHERBER PARTNERSHIP PROPERTIES. Public Present: Name Address Craig Scherber 11415 Valley Drive, Rogers, MN Dennis & Carol Medo 2420 Bridle Creek Trail Craig & Nina Wallestad 2475 Bridle Creek Trail (Own Lot) Residing at: 6566 France Ave. So, #1001, Edina Arvey & Marlene Eeg 2479 Bridle Creek Trail Greg Bradbury 2207 Boulder Road Gary Feldick 2231 Boulder Road Bob Finn 2108 Boulder Road Bill & Angela Lawrence 2122 Boulder Road Jeff& Cynthia Olson 2520 Bridle Creek Trail John P. Fisher 8470 Galpin Blvd. Dona Lee 2451 Bridle Creek Trail Scott & Michele Welsh 2461 Bridle Creek Trail Al Beaty 2193 Stone Creek Trail Bob & Jo/Ann Schwartz 2507 Bridle Creek Trail Steven & Nancy Cavanaugh 2441 Bridle Creek Trail Tom Loueks 8735 Goldenrod Lane, No, Maple Grove Peter Coyle 7900 Xerxes Avenue So, Mpls. 18 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Gary Scherber Box 181, Rogers, MN John Bereett 256 Washburn Avenue No, Mpls Mary & Mike Minear 2421 Bridle Creek Trail Jim & Kathryn Liddell 2550 Bridle Creek Trail Rene Schroeder 2337 Boulder Road Kelly Morloyl 2325 Boulder Road Ron Lindberg 2480 Bridle Creek Trail Rodney & Janice Melton 2413 Bridle Creek Trail Kris Barnes 2338 Boulder Road Susan Marshak 2527 Bridle Creek Trail Harry Marshall 2427 Bridle Creek Trail Andy Kindler 2198 Boulder Road Jeff J. 2151 Bridle Creek Trail Chris Hartwiegson 2140 Stone Creek Drive Kent & Melinda Hollrah 2450 Bridle Creek Trail Bob Generous presented the staff itpoit on this item. Mancino: Thank you Bob. Any questions for staff at this time? Bob, I have one. Or probably two. Just west of this property is Chaska's city line. Generous: Correct. Mancino: And that's industrial right now? Generous: Correct. Mancino: Industrial/commercial. Just west of Trotters Ridge. The old Carlson property. That is also Chaska. Generous: And industrial. Mancino: And industrial. The entire length of that border? Generous: Correct. Mancino: Okay. And Galpin is going south of TH 5 from Lyman to, Highway 5 is now going to be 4 lane? Generous: Eventually. 19 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Mancino: Is that correct? Hempel: A portion of it this summer. The remaining will be done either late this year or in '96, depending on the County. Mancino: Okay. But there are no, right now Lyman is 2 lane and are there any future to go 4 lane in that, Lyman? Hempel: I'm not aware of any current plans within the next two years of upgrading that portion but I'm sure it's on the County's comprehensive plan to upgrade that in the near future as well. Mancino: At some point. And the comprehensive plan is for industrial or commercial. What can go in there? Industrial/commercial. Generous: A corporate center. Light industries. Manufacturing. Warehousing. The preference in the community has been for a corporate center. We actually were trying to push a nursery business that wanted to relocate out into Chanhassen to this site. Mancino: Okay, thank you. Does the applicant or their designee wish to approach the Planning Commission please. Peter Coyle: Good evening Madam Chair, members of the Commission. My name is Peter Coyle. I'm an attorney with the Larkin-Hoffman law firm in Bloomington. I'm here tonight on behalf of your applicant, the Scherber Brothers Partnership and the two individual brothers, Gary and Craig Scherber are here with me this evening. I'm also accompanied by the planner and engineer for the project, Loueks and Associates, Mr. Tom Loueks and John Berg, principles of that firm are here as well to answer questions. John Fisher who is the property owner as well this evening. We'll try to be pretty concise in our presentation. I think staff has accurately and fairly described the project to you this evening. I think it's fair to say the issue is about the land use designation. If we get the land use designation issue resolved, the balance of the staff report is actually quite favorable to the project. There are some minor issues that they have raised but it's fair to say that we feel confident that we can work those out with the staff between the Planning Commission and City Council meeting, presuming we can satisfy any concerns you might have about the development of the property for residential. Low density residential. Just quickly to reiterate a couple of background issues for you. The property, as you know, is seeking to be re-guided. Rezoned. There's an application for a wetland alteration permit, and also a subdivision application before you. The property in description has 37 acres of developable property out of a larger portion of about 49 acres of land. The proposal is for 59 low density, single family detached housing units, 20 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 and it will include, as required by your City Code, a 25% minimum canopy coverage pursuant to your tree preservation and enhancement ordinance. The project takes careful account of the existing wetlands on the property and to a very minor extent I would say, proposes some filling of wetlands but there is substantial mitigation provided in the plan according to the Wetland Conservation Act and the project is in compliance with the Wetland Conservation Act in that respect. Staff has indicated that the property is directly adjacent to Trotter's Ridge to the north and Stone Creek, which is to the east and the Chaska Industrial Park. At this time what I'd like to do is ask Tom Loueks to forward and just briefly walk you through the site plan. Depending if there are any technical questions you have regarding the layout and then I'll address a couple of other broader issues that we'd like to...thank you. Tom Loueks: I'm glad Mr. Coyle forewarned me I was going to say something. I'm Tom Loueks. I'm the principal planner with Loueks and Associates and as Mr. Coyle has described the property. What we're proposing here is an alternative land use for this particular residential neighborhood. It's 59 single family residential lots. The net density is approximately 1.27 units per acre. The net, that's the gross density. The net density is about 1.82. A rather low density development. Our basic approach for this residential use is to minimize the impact and the effects on the natural environment on this site. We are proposing for example a minimal amount of grading for this residential site because of the existence of the large, mature trees on the property. Typically on a single family subdivision, as you may have witnessed in Chanhassen, and other communities around you, the developer comes in. We do a mass grading plan on the property. Set the building house pads and put in an inch and a half FHA tree and up springs a nice single family residential development. We are going to minimize all of those grading problems. We are not going to do any mass grading on this site. The type of grading we will do will be just sufficient enough to create some additional drainage patterns on the site. Put the roadways in. We are not going to pre- grade the building pads on these sites, and each individual home will be somewhat custom fitted to each site so that we do not have to remove a lot of material in terms of soils as well as vegetation. The issue has come up in regards to, in the staff report in regards to the wetland issues. There is less than 10,000 square feet of wetland that is going to be filled on this approximately 40 acre site. And maybe you should point out where that is. If I can't John, you will, won't you? This is a major area where we're suggesting some wetland filling. Our mitigation plan however is we're going to replace that 10,000 square feet with 30,000 square feet of mitigated wetland or additional wetland is going to be added to the property... Some of the previous staff reports we were able to evaluate...required by ponding and creating ponding areas and wildlife habitat areas... Our intention here is to create a community, a single family residential community...existing development...in the city of Chanhassen...We do recognizing it now there is an industrial park to the west in the city of Chaska. We think, or I believe that that not ought to dictate development here in the city of Chanhassen. And particularly when you have a relatively fragile piece such as this. A 40 feet difference in 21 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 elevation on this property from east to west There's heavily wooded tract of land. We're going to replace, or we're going to provide 258 more trees beyond what's in the report, or exists on the site. As part of our planning process, I probably should mention. I've been in the planning business for 25 years...about 2 nights a week I sit on your side of the table and • advise a Planning Commission and City Council what to do. When we initially looked at this site, and it's fair to say that our clients had thought it might be a good industrial site. But when they saw what was available there as a residential development, their objective was not to destroy the site. So we went through, we did go through a process where upon we created an industrial park and you don't want to see the results because it's very difficult to put office industrial park buildings on a site like this without flattening it. Without removing a great deal of vegetation. We think this is a reasonable alternative for the property and we think that, we also believe that in the spirit of the city of Chanhassen we're building in some protection to the existing neighborhoods in the area. If you should have some technical questions or just general questions, I'd be more than happy to answer them. Mr. Coyle, I'm sure will be happy to answer any questions, and our client as well... Mancino: Thank you very much. Peter Coyle: Madam Chair and Commission members. I've got a few other points that I'll make relative to the comprehensive plan issues that staff has raised with you and I will, where possible, I'll try to provide you with quotations on the comp plan that supports the application of the Scherber Brothers Partnership. First of all it's worth noting that from a zoning history standpoint, the City Council in the last 12 years has twice denied application to rezone this property for industrial use. And so at least we have that little bit of track record to indicate that the City Council has, on previous occasions not been inclined to pursue industrial development and a zoning change. The comprehensive plan in it's policy statement recognizes that planned growth can and should be designed to minimize, and I'm quoting here, environmental neighborhood and traffic impacts. We think that this neighborhood property will clearly satisfy that policy and an industrial development will not satisfy our policy. The plan further states, and I'm quoting again, the more incompatible the neighboring uses, the more important that transition zone. What staff is recommending, as I understand their argument, is that the city will be better off by bringing in other industrial development smack up against two existing residential districts as opposed to developing a new residential district to buffer the existing industrial district that's in place in Chaska. And again we don't think that that is consistent with your comprehensive plan policies. The comprehensive plan goes on to state that the city should avoid running high traffic volumes and/or non-residential traffic through residential neighborhoods, and I'm again quoting from the plan. The plan provides that the city should provide adequate land for protective housing growth. The plan states that some of Chanhassen's most prominent natural features are the areas of extensive tree coverage. Again, a direct quote from... Trees are important...of the city's image and 22 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 should be preserved where feasible. Clearly this plan is designed from the get go with an objective not only of preserving the tree stand that's there, but by virtue of your very best tree ordinance, Scherber Brothers will be required to add several hundred trees to the site in order to bring it up to the 25% minimum tree coverage required by code. The plan states that single family detached housing will continue to be the dominant planning use and housing type...proposal. The comp plan favors preservation. I'm quoting, that development be consistent with the preservation and enhancement of significant natural features and aesthetic amenities. I'm quoting again. If Chanhassen's present residential growth rate continues, the supply of vacant land within the MUSA will be exhausted by the end of 1993. In the industrial policy statement, the comprehensive plan does recognize the property as a potential source of industrial development and the fundamental basis for the conclusion that this is good property for that, is that it's not being currently used for residential or agricultural purposes. It doesn't go forward and demonstrate how this property provides an essential link- up with the city's industrial corridor that's developing along Highway 5, which makes good sense given the high traffic volumes on that property further to the north and further to the east. And more importantly, in staffs report, there really isn't a discussion at all of the impact of bringing an industrial development project up against the existing residential projects that are in place. It's far simpler, as you all know, to convince a neighborhood, a residential neighborhood that more residential neighbors on a well designed project is in their best interest as opposed to trying to bring in an industrial project up against residential. That's a little tough to sell. Staff has talked about permitted industrial uses on the property. I would note that warehouses are permitted. Body shops are permitted and light manufacturing is permitted as a permitted use. A conditional use on the property would be motor trade terminals, contractors yards, outdoor storage and mineral excavation. Staff has cited, and is relying on an article that was published by PAS, and I want to make note of a couple of comments that are reflected in that article where the authors themselves acknowledge the deficiencies of the study that lays out the land use ratios. The article notes that all of the cities surveyed provide different land use categories and that it is very difficult for the authors to try to reconcile their various land uses in a coherent formula. The article notes that they had a very difficult time manipulating the data, their word, and that that weakens the results. The authors of the article went on to note that they had a difficult time interpreting the data because of the different land use standards. And the authors concluded that the survey basically ignored land uses that are either vacant, agricultural or not improved at the present time. So we don't know what chunks of land may have been left out of those studies and what those affects would have been on the land use ratios. But the most compelling point I think about the article itself is even the authors don't try to lay out any precise formula or even a recommended formula where the mix of land between residential, commercial and industrial. They'd rather just cite a survey of roughly 25 communities and state what their formulas are, as best they can be determined. I'd like to talk for just a minute about the tree preservation ordinance that the city has in it's codes, which is as I say, quite aggressive and 23 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 one which we intend to comply with. The policy states, or the code states, it's the policy of the city to preserve natural woodland areas, is what this development proposes. If this project develops as low density residential, the developer must satisfy a 25% canopy coverage plan. On the other hand, it says the property, if as staff recommends the property is developed for industrial purposes, the canopy coverage is only 10%. So it really is somewhat difficult to understand how industrial development in this property would be more protective of this site than the project proposed by the Scherber Brothers Partnership. Having said that, it is sincerely our intent to work with staff. If there are deficiencies in the site design that we've submitted to you this evening, we are prepared to sit down with them to work out those deficiencies. They've probably got some good ideas and we maybe haven't listened too carefully enough, but we certainly will work with them to correct those deficiencies. We think that it's quite clear from the site plan to your ordinances to your comprehensive plan, that a residential development on this property is a preferred use of this land. Staff has identified a potential economic impact to the property but it's fair to say that the variables that are essential to determining return on investment are market demand, the type of development you actually get on the property and what kind of investments the city may be required to make in order to allow that industrial development to occur. What we know for sure is that there's a developer who's prepared to pay fair market value to develop this property for a market that that developer believes to be present right now. What we don't have any idea of is whether industrial development of this property will occur in 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, or maybe 20 years. That's why we ask you to consider that as well. At this point we would ask for the support of the Planning Commission and ask you to adopt a resolution in support of the, both the comprehensive plan, rezoning, subdivision and wetland alteration permit applications that have been submitted and forward this to the City Council with a favorable recommendation of approval. We'd be happy to answer any questions at this time. Mancino: Any questions for Mr. Coyle? No questions at this time. Thank you. Is there anyone else that would like to speak, Mr. Coyle, from your team? Peter Coyle: Not from our team at this time. Mancino: Okay, thank you very much. May I have a motion to open this for a public hearing please? Conrad moved, Farmakes seconded to open the public hewing. All voted in favor and the motion canied. The public hewing was opened. Mancino: This is open for a public hearing. Is there anyone that would like to speak on this issue? Please come up, one at a time. State your name and your address and we're here to listen. Thank you. 24 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Greg Bradbury: Madam Chairman, Council. Greg Bradbury. I reside at 2207 Boulder Road, which is in the single family subdivision just east of the proposed project. I think the issue here, from when I sit and listen, becomes more of an issue of economics than it is an issue of what is right for the community and what is right for the residents of the community. I think a couple of things that are being overlooked here, and some things that I should really compliment the Planning Commission on is the wonderful work that they have done with changing the city and upholding such high standards for all the retailers and for the home developers in the area. But I think we owe it to the people in Chanhassen and also the retailers that have come into this area to help them survive and do well. And I think by bringing in residential residents who will support our existing retail and keep it strong and healthy, is something that wasn't brought up and I think it could be an issue. The other thing I think if you were to walk from my neighborhood and talk to people, they would be greatly opposed to an industrial site. I think another issue is also we are building a school on TH 5 and Galpin Lake Road there too and I think the increase in traffic, as the attorney had mentioned, would certainly not be something, with my wife, myself and our new daughter would recommend or condone. With that being said, I sincerely hope that the committee rules in favor of the developer to put in 59 new beautiful homes rather than 6 or 5 ugly big buildings. Thank you. Mancino: Thank you. Please come up. Mike Minear: My name is Mike Minear. I live at 2421 Bridle Creek Trail. I'd like to point out my back yard adjoins this property. I would like to strongly disagree with one thing that the staff brought up that there's nothing unique about this property. I think what is clearly unique is the closeness of the new school that we're investing a lot of money in, and the deep concern we have that the traffic on Galpin Road would be increased dramatically with the potential commercial business. That we don't know what that would be. I feel as a very new resident to Chanhassen, we moved here about 4 months ago from Cincinnati and we chose Chanhassen for the beauty and the nice things we find here and I think we'll feel very betrayed if you put a commercial property literally at the back...to my home. Thank you. Mancino: Thank you. Al Beaty: Madam Chairman and members. My name is Al Beaty. I live at 2193 Stone Creek and that is the single family residential development directly east of this proposed development. I'm proud to say and happy to say that I'm almost a 3 month resident of Chanhassen. Happy to be here and I have an 8 year daughter and 5 year old son that live with me and we are concerned about the industrial or office nature of development on that site that's in question. We would be concerned about the nature and the amount of commercial traffic that may be generated. We would be concerned about the nature and the 25 • Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 amount of the industrial uses that we would make to that property. Some of the uses that have been mentioned here tonight, relatively benign. A nursery doesn't seem like an obnoxious industrial use, but there are other uses that seem to be incompatible with being adjacent to the single family developments to the north and the east. I would also be concerned about the safety of my children and the other children that will be attending the new school at the corner of Highway 5 and Galpin. And I thought the improvements of the Galpin Boulevard to 4 lanes was due to the school to handle the increase bus traffic. I wasn't aware that it had been designated a collector and would be subject to commercial traffic. I think that the development pattern that seems to have merged in the past couple years may be somewhat different than it was originally envisioned under the plan that was put into effect in 1991. I would request that you consider that when you make your decision tonight. I think the marketplace is changing here. I think Chanhassen is a very desirable place for people to live and I think single family dwellings are going to become very important for Chanhassen, as I'm sure you know. I would strongly prefer not to have an office industrial development located in this area. And I hope that you would approve two of the items that are requested tonight. The comprehensive plan, land use map amendment from office industrial to residential low density and the rezoning to single family resident. I would strongly support those two. The other issues that are here, I'm not that well educated on and I think that is between the staff and the developer to work those two out. Or work those other issues out. Thank you very much for listening and appreciate the opportunity. Mancino: Thank you. Jim Liddell: Good evening. I'm Jim Liddell at, I live in the Trotters Ridge development on Bridle Creek Trail and my concerns are the same. My house does not back up or is adjacent to the proposed property. I actually face Galpin Avenue or Galpin Boulevard, and the traffic is a major concern of mine. The industrial traffic that is going back and forth from the school construction zone and from that nursery. I don't know the name of it but it would be south of this one, and their harvest season the delivery trucks are going through there actually about 70 mph and I think my concern, besides the speeding vehicles, with service and light industrial, is we are building a school, as you've heard and the traffic in that area is especially heavy at the same hours that our school is functioning. There's a number of companies there in that Chaska development region that are working three shifts a day so the change out is at 7:00 and at 3:00 so the heavy traffic patterns there is 7:00 to 8:00 and then from 3:00 to 4:00. That would be like Flouroware and FSI and some of the bigger companies in that northern Chaska region. So I would encourage you to consider the current traffic patterns as being too heavy as they are and by putting in more industrial traffic in that area, to burden that area would not be right for the community. Would not be right for the investment that Chanhassen's making for the school and would not be right for us homeowners that are already in there. Thank you. 26 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Mancino: Thank you. Anyone else? Trotters Ridge Resident: My name's...Bridle Creek Trail. I live just, I have the wetland just on the back side of the...are here also. I'm a mother of three. I'm home all day and in Trotters Ridge there's probably at least 10 mothers at home all day. There's a lot of children in that area. I'm concerned just about the industrial already. It's all night there's great big clanging all during the whole night. I've got a lot of wildlife in my back yard. I've got wild turkeys that are there all day...there's geese and ducks and the cattle are wonderful. We'll lose those but, we lived 6 years in Bloomington and we moved from Bloomington to Chanhassen because of the quietness. Because of the country kind of thing there and we'd just really like to have that stay there. Mancino: And where are you hearing the noise at night, all night from? Trotters Ridge Resident: Which building I'm not sure but it's one of those big ones back there. Clanging all night... Mancino: Oh existing in Chaska, okay. Trotters Ridge Resident: Thanks. Mancino: Thank you very much. Rodney Melton: Hi. I'm Rodney Melton. I also live in Trotters Ridge and you've met most of my neighbors. ...talked about. Jan, Stefan and I, as you most have probably heard Stefan, have been living here since November of last year. We moved here from Houston, Texas. And I must say, we really love this area. We looked up in Plymouth. Spent a lot of time in that area. Decided on Chanhassen. Basically because of the subdivisions. As you know there's a lot of industrial activity in the Plymouth area. We were out the 4th of July. Very proud of the fireworks. You know a lot of great things going on in Chanhassen area. We do not want to have an industrial complex in our back yard. I invite all of you to come over and spend some time on our deck and look out. Have you seen this property that we're talking about? It's really beautiful property. There's a lot of property just south of Lyman that's, I understand it's already zoned for industrial development. There's also an additional 95 acres just to the east of Galpin that's designated for industrial development. We need to have a residential community behind us. Thank you. Mancino: Thank you. 27 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Scott Welsh: My name is Scott Welsh and I live at 2461 Bridle Creek and I'd just like to say, I agree with all my neighbors that are speaking tonight. But I want to add another twist. I work for a commercial developer, Welsh Companies and I can't imagine that a developer would take this parcel serious in the near future when there's a lot of other land in Chanhassen off of Highway 5 and Chaska. This land has a lot of tree replacement and water replacement. Water shedding. Leveling and taking away a lot of the characteristics of the land that's already there. I'd just like to give my commercial real estate opinion and I think if the city is planning on this as a tax basis, you're not going to see a commercial developer take this site serious in the near future. There's a lot of other property that they'll probably take more serious and consider first before viewing this property as something that is developable. Thanks. Mancino: Thank you. Steven Cavanaugh: My name is Steven Cavanaugh and again, you've met all my neighbors. I live 2441 Bridle Creek Trail. Again, I'm one of these, yeah over here. Lot 6. My perspective is, I own a business in Golden Valley and it probably fits into two categories what the gentleman is talking about. When he talks about light industrial warehouse and manufacturing. I own a packaging company, 40,000 square feet. So my understanding is the company that I own in Golden Valley would be actively welcome in Chanhassen. I can tell you about the traffic that comes to my building. I probably get 20 semi's a day and enumerable smaller trucks. I don't think with a school half a mile down Galpin Boulevard that the children, all these people have children. I don't have children but all these people here have children. Most of them do. There are children are all over. There are children at Stone Creek. I can't imagine these children walking down their streets with the amount of traffic I, in 40,000 square feet, generate. I just can't imagine that in all these beautiful subdivisions, that a development of light industrial manufacturing warehousing would even be considered. And again I want to reiterate what everyone else said here. That we are looking at a gorgeous park right outside of our back. This is pasture land that I thought I had to go to Ireland to see, but I'm seeing it outside my back window. And then I understand, I hear this remark about adequate buffering and I don't know what that means. I don't know what that means. Are we going to put mountains or, I don't know what buffering means. Maybe somebody can explain what buffering means in a plain language sometime but I have no idea what it means but I cannot believe that it would be buffered so well that the traffic would be altered away from the neighborhood or that no one would be impacted...back yard. That's really all I have to say. I hope you vote this down. Thank you very much. Mancino: Thank you. 28 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Jeff Olson: Good evening. My name is Jeff Olson. I'm here with my wife Cynthia. We're also on the Trotters Ridge team and recently moved out there to a new house. One point that I'd like to make, I've got a couple. One is, there are a few head shakes and a few chuckles when someone mentioned something about the expansion of the Galpin Boulevard. Before we bought our lot we contacted the city staff and were told at that time, probably 6-7 months ago, that there were no plans to expand that other than some turning lanes and the signal at TH 5. So this has been quite a revelation to me in the last week to find out what's going on. And there's a learning curve and I'm quickly getting up to speed here. Quite frankly it's kind of upsetting to me. I just made a big investment out there and it probably shows. I personally fail to see the bevy of benefits that have been eluded to here by putting some industrial development in there. We've already got development, industrial behind us to the west. We'll gladly share some of those benefits with some other neighborhoods in the community. They can have those benefits. We'll share them. We've already got our's. The other, I wrote down several things. A lot of them were covered by Mr. Coyle in his presentation. What I'd like to see is you recommend residential development here and what I'd like to see is that to go forward. There might be some things that I would like to see done differently here but I think the developers are willing to work with the staff and what I'd like to see is that go forward and have them work together if both sides realize it's a two way street and there's no ego problems or battles that develop just because someone didn't get their way and have industrial development there. I think this thing can work out beautifully if the people work and see it as a two way street and develop this and save all these trees, which you know, we had our problems with the tree ordinance when we started building our's. That's one of the things we came out here for, was the treed areas. The residential. The feeling of community and I think we lose that if we go the other way on this. Thank you. Dennis Medo: Hi. My name is Dennis Medo and I'm also part of Trotters Ridge. I'm 2420, which looks across a couple people...into the field. A couple things. I've, because of my job, been transferred several times. This is my third time here in Minnesota. First time lived in Bloomington. Second time Burnsville. This time Chanhassen. The reason I picked Chanhassen is, (a) it was a tough job convincing my wife to go out this far. Keep in mind far. It's not far but to get the feel that you're out away from everything as opposed to being in industrial. I was born and raised in Chicago. Last move was out of Chicago suburbs. I would hope to god that this planning commission does a whole lot better job of what many of the suburbs in Chicago have done. Light industrial, whatever you want to call it, does not fit well in residential. And if you think it does, then you should move here. Live here in that approved area. It's not going to work. Thank you. Mancino: Thank you. Anyone else? 29 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Mark Christian: My name is Mark Christian. These are all neighbors of mine too. We back way up to the proposed development. One of the reasons we did move out to Chanhassen was because of the trees. We saw our lot in September and there are gorgeous oak trees out there. Like 20 inches around...that are just beautiful during the fall time. That was one of the main reasons why I moved to Chanhassen. I was out here all year and...as well as the neighbors, is the traffic flow. There already is quite a bit of traffic on Galpin and with an industrial park, it would be even more. Those are our concerns. But it is just gorgeous out there and we would hate to have those trees destroyed. Thanks. Mancino: Thank you. Nina Wallestad: Good evening. I'm Nina Wallestad. My husband and I own a lot on 2475 Bridle Creek Trail and I would guess that the only comment that is left to be made is our concern over the effects of an industrial office complex on the values of our homes and we know that this would have a very great impact on the value and future resale of our homes, which indeed would affect the city's revenue, tax wise and otherwise. The city has approved neighborhoods and executive homes on two of the three borders of this property and I would just remind you that you only have control over three of them. The fourth is definitely a Chaska border and it seems inconsistent now to approve industrial zoning on the remaining border over which you have control. So again we'd just ask that you truly consider this matter very closely and consider the impacts upon residents in your community. Thank you. Mancino: Thank you. Anyone else wish to address the Planning Commission? Jeff Finch: Hi. My name is Jeff Finch and I live at 2304 Stone Creek Drive. I'd just like to say that I agree with most of what the people have said here in Trotters Ridge and Stone Creek neighborhood about increased traffic problems...especially from people with children. I'm also concerned about the noise. Increased noise issue with the approval of light industrial. So I would like to reiterate what someone else said here that I would like you to approve the rezoning at least and then work out the rest of the issues with the current developer...Thank you. Mancino: Thank you. Anyone else? May I have a motion to close the public hearing? Conrad moved, Faimakes seconded to close the public hewing. All voted in favor and the motion canied. The public hewing was closed. Mancino: Did we volunteer to do this? Appreciate everyone speaking tonight. Comments. Ladd. 30 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Conrad: I heard real valid comments from the neighbors. I think if I were there, if I lived in that area, I'd be saying exactly the same thing. I've been trying to say what kind of a speech I'm going to make tonight because it might be more of a speech than reaction to what's in front of me but, it will be a speech. I moved here 25 years ago. I did because it was natural. And that's why most people come out here. It's getting full. It will be full in another 10 years so, regardless of what we think it should be, those fields are drying up and the cows are going and it's a problem for those of us who have been around for a while. Probably the reason I got on the Planning Commission. If it's going to go that way, which it does, then you try to plan. And when you plan, you do what's called a comprehensive plan, which we did. We probably spent, what year was it done Kate? Aanenson: It was finished in '91. You spent a couple years. Mancino: Two years. Conrad: We spent years figuring it out. And it's going to be wrong no matter what. You just can't figure some of the stuff out but I don't think anybody else up here has to take credit for it or discredit for it but I was there when we did it and we made some pretty, every time you have transitions, you make some compromises in here. You make some decisions. One of the things you try to do is make sure there's enough space for what you've got planned for, and I think when I moved out, I was happy to keep this all residential. Didn't need a commercial building, retail. We'll go into the city so. That's kind of changed and I think we're now a fairly substantial retail center, but you know we don't have any more retail land. We're full. So what you see is what you're going to get. There's no more retail land right now. Well, we can probably make that analogy in industrial commercial. Neighbors, I've been on the commission for a while so probably have a little bit of background when people come in and I try to, you know...some volunteers up here trying to really be sensitive to the community. Really sensitive, and we're probably overly so. People move out here. They just don't want change and the problem is, they also don't want a tax increase. And when we're here, we hear two things. Don't change my neighborhood and don't raise my taxes, and everything else sort of comes later. So we kind of balance this. There was a reason for the commercial industrial zoning here. It was that way. That doesn't mean we can't change it. Staff has done a good job of analysis. You could pick holes at it and maybe have a different point of view but really they did a, in my mind, a real nice job of analyzing this. It doesn't mean it can't be residential but there's a lot of logic for keeping it where it is. Couple other points and there's a lot of insecurity and again I'd probably be saying the same things you said. If you look at our industrial commercial in Chanhassen, it's excellent. If you find a bad industrial park, let me know. This is good stuff out here so whatever you hear from another area, doesn't apply to Chan. If you're worried about buffering, we spent so much time. We spend hours of our life, days of our life trying to figure out how to buffer things so whether it 31 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 be, whatever. Buffering solves a whole lot of problems. We even have, we have a draft of a buffer ordinance that may or may not pass so there's predictable solutions. Again, I don't think I'm persuading you that you want to live next to industrial commercial but I think, I want to just make sure you feel that the commission and City Council cares about those things. Things do make transitions and we're concerned about that. We tend to be very liberal here. If we see something that's sort of God, Motherhood and the Flag, we'll do it. Residential is God, Motherhood and the Flag and you know, how can you be so, how can you go against that? What starts to happen though, somebody has to really raise the tax issue. Has to raise the revenue issue and if I don't see, if we eat this land up, you know I'm not a genius on land like this but we really do have to know if we're going to put more industrial commercial into. We're going to have to take it out of some other residential area if we kind of want to balance the taxes. Now somebody can make a pretty good point that this doesn't matter. That this is 50-60 acres and geez, it's not going to develop for 10 years into commercial but still. My point will be tonight, I have to know if we are losing that kind of revenue tax wise. Second thing, I have to be persuaded that this is a benefit to Chanhassen too. I zoned, I guided it for this. I felt kind of convinced, even though it's a fringe area, kind of convinced that this was the right thing for that property. But for me to change it, I would have to see something that Chanhassen is looking for that we need that, and it's not just residential. It's something special in the residential area. I don't know that I see it here. I think if the developer came in and presented me something and I said, wow. That's what we've been looking for. We don't have concentrated houses or we don't have open spaces in Chanhassen where we've sort of clustered some things and you know, staff did a nice job of giving us those options. I don't see that here and there's nothing wrong with this. You know this is, with some tweaks here and there, this is just fine but at this point in time, I'm sure to everybody's chagrin, you know I'm not really ready to rezone it. Mancino: Thank you for your comments. Jeff. Farmakes: First of all, I'm happy to see everybody here tonight. I'll remind everybody that there's an election year next year and for you newcomers to Chanhassen, this is probably your first, I don't know if it's your first but if it's your first situation in a very fluid, growing community, be involved and I encourage you not just to come in for this and things that are built next to your house but become involved in commissions and volunteers in the community relies on that heavily. Often we see a lot of people show up here in relationship to development of a farm field next to their home and we never see them again and the city's heavily dependent upon people coming in and volunteering for these situations. That's what you see up here on the commission. We're people such as yourself. We're living in a suburb here and neighborhoods, maybe adjacent next to you and we're dealing with issues of planning that deal with a lot of different interests. As Ladd went over, we have taxation. Many people that have lived here for years have seen their taxes go up 40%-50% over a short 32 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 period of time. The city has grown 300% in a short period of time. Several people who came up here tonight said that they just moved to the community. I'm reminded of a meeting that we had a couple of meetings ago where the developer comes in and he sits down and he says, the reason we want to build here is because they have all these beautiful trees and then someone point out. Well, to move there, you're going to have to cut down all those beautiful trees. He said, well that's a given in development and I was trying to resolve that in my mind. There really isn't a resolution there. You simply have to work at saving what you can and realize that the land's going to be developed. This land is going to be developed. What concerns me is how it was developed prior to getting here. As you can see on a map where Timberwood was a large lot development that took place to the north of that property, or to the northeast. That development sort of got ahead of planning and I think it was, it has been I guess you'd say, you can plant a flower somewhere. Pretty soon you've got a bunch of other flowers around it. And I've always been concerned when the other developments that you're living in now adjacent to Timberwood, I believe they came in and said, gee these houses are too small. These lots are too small. This isn't what we thought would be here. These subdivisions. We think everybody should be on 2 1/2 acres. That didn't happen. If all your houses were on 2 1/2 acres, your houses would be maybe twice as expensive when you bought them. Again, you're dealing with different interests. Different investments. You're talking about an investment. That's a county road. It's not even in the city's jurisdiction to widen it. The reason that they're widening these roads is because people are moving out here, and they've got to. In case of some of the roads where I'm at, when a car's parked on the side of the road, two opposing cars have to go into the other lane to get around. Things, when they were developed and designed many years ago weren't always to an optimum. They're constantly changing the rules here and that's part of city government. We change them in relationship to the economy. People are moving out here. The tax base. Money that comes in from the State and Federal government. We constantly have to be changing things, and change is an issue. If you live in Chanhassen, it's like a daily thing. I've always been concerned about the development surrounding Timberwood and it's a continuing problem. I brought it up with Stone Creek and some of the other developments and the issues of any development that goes around there. It shouldn't have been there. If you were looking at it from strictly a planning issue. It should have never gotten there in the first place, but it's there and the other developments alike are growing around it. What concerns me is that once, if this becomes single family residence, it will continue. The lot next to it will want to be the same thing. Let me finish. Let me finish. Audience: ...have you even been there? Farmakes: I've lived here for 15 years. Mancino: Excuse me. No speaking while the commission is speaking. 33 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Farmakes: Let me finish. What I'm trying to do is talk to you about the issues that we deal with here, not only your lot but we're setting precedence for other issues. Ladd was referring to, if you give and take within a base. Tax base. You're setting precedence here. Every commission meeting that we have here, we're dealing with this. This is not just this development. There's several developments on the other side of TH 5. It's the same issue. So what I'm trying to deal with in one way here is to talk to you about the generalities of development, and I know that's not what you want to hear but there's a practicality that's involved in this that we have to, one is legal. The other is that, in general politically a city wants to service it's residents. And in general you get a room full of people in here that are concerned. They made investments into the city and they come forward and say, this is what we would like to have adjacent to us. We'd rather have single family homes than industrial. That's sounds fine and like Ladd, I'd say that in general, that's how I perceive Chanhassen. It's a bedroom community. On the other hand, we also deal with people who come in and say, you just raised my taxes 30%. Why? I can't live here anymore. I've got to move out. I'm not sure that I'm not amenable to changing this, and I'll say why. I have never thought that residential should have been there in the first place, and have voted against it in the past. On the other developments. I think that the city has created it's own problem here in this property, and the adjacent properties next to it. And I'm talking about over a period of history that the city has dealt with this. We're compounding the problem I think by cornering that area. I think that's what's left over. And I would refer back to the staffs issue of compromise. I'm looking at some of the issues that they've listed in their report, and I would consider that be looked at seriously. And I would support the argument that this use is becoming, the planned use, is becoming less consistent based on the decisions the city has made already in regards to the adjacent residential development. It's expanded and I think the city has to come to terms with that. It's long term plan. And should consider looking at some of the solutions and compromises that the staff has talked about. Mancino: As in clustering? As in? Farmakes: Looking at alternate uses to the industrial and further going into what could go adjacent to existing residential. Mancino: Okay. Farmakes: As for this particular development, I'm not going to make a comment on that right now. But I don't think that that's where it's at, what has come before us. • Mancino: So would you support at this time the rezoning? Into single family. Or would you rather wait and see something. 34 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Farmakes: I would rather wait until I saw what that compromise situation is going to be. Mancino: Thank you. Craig. Peterson: I see a certain amount of irony, having been recently sitting in your side of table and I was on the part of a corporation, fighting for a rezoning in Eden Prairie that was going from commercial to residential on both sides of our corporate building. And the residents ironically were against residential going up against them. They preferred having commercial next to them. I think corporate offices for a lot of reasons. Number one, being that the times that they were at home, the offices were generally vacant and so there was cross trafficking. They were addressing the tax base in Eden Prairie being high. So I empathize. I have been where you're at today recently and I'm struggling with balancing that right now in Chanhassen as we deal with this development. I also concur with Ladd that the tax base is a serious issue. That I personally heard of people having to move out of Chanhassen because of the high taxes and going up and up and that has to be addressed and it has to be addressed by us and by yourselves. I think that I personally would like to see something more unique. That was the key thing that Ladd said earlier is that what we have here is somewhat of a normal subdivision that doesn't create anything that is atypical to the rest of the developments in Chanhassen. So I think right now, until I would see something that is more creative, I wouldn't support rezoning either. Mancino: Thank you. Bob. Skubic: Somebody made a comment regarding the, that the city planners, council has done a pretty good job of developing retail areas. I think that we have to, I think the Council and the Planning Commission here, staff and yourselves, as Jeff pointed to, all can make the most of this property or satisfy the needs of the adjacent residents and the needs of the industrial community to satisfy the tax base and provide employment and so forth. I just think that, and I think staff offered some good alternatives that meet some of these needs. I think something can be worked out here. I wouldn't favor rezoning at this point. Mancino: Thank you. Mike. Meyer: I have three conflicts of interest that I can count on this so I'm not going to make any comments at this time. I won't be voting. Mancino: Okay, thank you. Well, I think I concur with the rest of the Planning Commission. We would like to see something, have the developer come back and not support rezoning. Whether that be a mix of single family, larger lots to the north that abuts Trotters Ridge and 35 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 some industrial in the southern part, or a clustering development, etc. So that's what I would like to see come back before us. Any other comments or questions? Conrad: Yeah. I think issues like this are interesting. I think as this goes up to City Council, I'd sure like to have staff be prepared to talk about replacement of industrial land. If there is any. Where it would come from. I'd like to have staff give the City Council a recommendation in terms of our need for industrial commercial. You know it sat, we've really sat for a while without a whole lot of development and, I'd just like to take a look at that. As I talk about having enough space, I think it's real important that, you know this is not philosophy as much as it is in practice. We really haven't built much recently and so what does that mean? Does that mean we're priced too high for, I guess I'd just like the staffs analysis to be presented to the City Council along with whatever recommendation we make tonight. Mancino: And I'd also like to add to Ladd's, and that would be, and I think the thing that we heard the most from the residents is, number one, traffic on Galpin and is there a way to limit that more to Lyman and not Galpin. So that may be residential off Galpin. It may be industrial off Lyman. And secondly, and boy can I identify with this lately, and that is noise. I mean you, how do we buffer noise? How do we buffer that third shift? And when you hear those back-up, I can hear a quarter mile away the back-up on any truck or anything that just pierces through the sky. I mean it's unbelievable so traffic and noise, I think is what I kept hearing tonight. Now the public hearing is closed. Do you wish to ask a question? Tom Loueks: I would like to ask a question. I made a presentation. Mancino: Okay. Tom Loueks: The sense of the Planning Commission is this should be developed for industrial park purposes? Mancino: Well we have not voted so we. Tom Loueks: The sense of it. Mancino: Yes. Tom Loueks: And so what you would prefer to see us come back with then is an industrial park plan for this property and I'm not certain, if I understand what the alternative proposals have been brought forward in the staff report. One is half industrial and half residential. The other recommendation or suggestion by staff was to do something unique and different. For 36 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 example, create low and moderate income housing. Zero lot lines. Townhouse type development mix. Is that what you're suggesting? That's my sense of it is that this, as an alternative to industrial, your preference would be to meet the metropolitan or the regional planning agency's goal of 10% low cost housing...under a PUD. And we can accomplish that. Conrad: Madam Chair? Mancino: Yes, Ladd will take that over. Conrad: Yeah, we're not talking about building slums. Tom Loueks: No, no. Absolutely not. Conrad: I think what we're saying, or at least what I'm saying. I can't speak for, we haven't voted yet so, I mean normally we don't enter into these conversations but basically you haven't persuaded us yet. The residents would like to have single family. You haven't persuaded us this is it. You're their chance to make this single family. You haven't sold us on it. Tom Loueks: I'm just speaking direction because we will have to make the determination of to move forward with a negative recommendation to the City Council or to come back with an option and I want to know what those options are. Mancino: Okay, thank you. Do I have a motion? Conrad: I'll make the motion. I'll give the neighbors my phone number. Do we have a page? Mancino: Page 18. Conrad: Okay, thanks. Okay, I'll make a recommendation the Planning Commission recommends denial of the land use map amendment #95-1, Rezoning #95-2, and Preliminary Plat #95-4 and the Wetland Alteration Permit #95-2 with, and I'm going to re-state what I said earlier to staff. That's my motion but I also would like staff to present to the City Council the issues on replacement land in Chanhassen for industrial commercial. The real financial impact of taking this out of the industrial commercial zone, which is tough to do. But again, just needing somebody more expert than myself to analyze this. And I'm going to paraphrase, I'm going to put the rationale for my request right now is that the developer really hasn't presented us with the type of plan that would allow us to seriously consider moving this from the proposed zone, the proposed commercial industrial zone to residential. 37 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Mancino: A second? Skubic: Second. Mancino: Any discussion on the motion? Conrad moved, Skubic seconded that the Planning Commission recommends denial of Land Use Map Amendment #95-1, Rezoning #95-2, Preliminary Plat #95-4, and Wetland Alteration Permit #95-2. All voted in favor, except Meyer who did not vote, and the motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT TO FILL 0.66 ACRE OF WETLAND BASINS NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 5 AND GALPIN BOULEVARD (T116N, RWE2, SECTION 16, NE 1/4 NE 1/4). TWO SMALL WETLANDS AND A VERY SMALL PART OF ONE LARGE WETLAND WILL BE FILLED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTHERN HIGHWAY 5 FRONTAGE ROAD AND A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THESE WETLAND IMPACTS WILL BE REPLACED AT A RATIO OF 2:1 WITH A WETLAND RESTORATION PROJECT JUST SOUTHWEST OF LAKE SUSAN (T116N, R23W, SECTION 23, NE 1/4 W 1/2), CITY OF CHANHASSEN. Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. Mancino: Thank you Kate. Any questions for staff? I do. Could you show the previous map? Aanenson: Sure. Mancino: Now, the frontage road that goes from Galpin to TH 41 is. Aanenson: This road right here. This is the property line. This is the area that we're securing for the park. The Park Commission is working with Mrs. O'Shaughnessy in securing this portion. And then we believe that when the Gateway West property develops, we'll also get the additional property here. It will be approximately a 100 acre passive park so this road will ultimately serve as access to that and there will be parking. Mancino: A question for you. Is that's the only place along that entire roadway, all the way from Galpin to TH 41 that we need to fill the wetland? 38 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Aanenson: A study was done as to look at where would be the least impact. There's a lot of poor soils in that area. It's very marshy and we believe that that location, in order to meet, and Dave you can correct me if I'm wrong. In order to meet State Aid design standards. The curvature on the design of the road, that is the area of least impact in order to meet the design standards of the road. Mancino: But when Opus comes in, to continue the road all the way to TH 41, are they going to also have to do some wetland mitigation in their area? Aanenson: Through their portion? Mancino: Yeah. Through their portion. Aanenson: Yes. If you look on that map, they may need to. They also have fingers of poor soil that run through that beyond this point so more than likely when they come in for development, we'll probably be looking at some wetland alteration. Mancino: Okay. To continue that. Aanenson: Right. Mancino: Okay, thank you. Any other questions for staff? May I have a move to open this for, oh. The applicant's already done that. May I have a motion to open this for a public hearing please? Meyer moved, Peterson seconded to open the public hewing. All voted in favor and the motion canied. The public heating was opened. Mancino: Thank you. This is open for a public hearing. Anyone wishing to address the Planning Commission at this time on this issue? Seeing one, may I have a motion to close the public hearing. Meyer moved, Peterson seconded to close the public healing. All voted in favor and the motion canied. The public hewing was closed. Mancino: Thank you. Jeff. Farmakes: I have no comments on this. Mancino: Bob. 39 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Skubic: No comments. Mancino: Mike. Meyer: No comments. Peterson: No comments. Conrad: It's okay. Mancino: My only comment would be that, and I will certainly vote to go ahead but I would just ask, and make sure that City Council looks at the whole roadway. That frontage road and make sure that they want it and they want it to connect and they want to fill the wetland because there is more to fill for that roadway and I don't know who's expense that will be but if it's the city's expense, I just think that they would want to look at that and make sure they want to do that. May I have a motion please? Farmakes: I make a motion that the staff recommend that Wetland Alteration Permit #95-4... be approved and that staff pursue the possibilities for wetland enhancement to the large DNR wetland under the following conditions, 1 thru 6. And do you want to add a proviso to the City Council? Mancino: No. They have our Minutes. Thank you. Second please. Meyer: Second. Faimakes moved, Meyer seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Wetland Alteration Permit #95-4 and direct staff to pursue the possibilities for wetland enhancement to the large DNR wetland under the following conditions: 1. Wetland Conservation Act conditions are met. 2. General Permit 17 under the Army Corps of Engineers is applicable and should be completed by the City. 3. The applicant shall develop a sediment and erosion control plan in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Type III erosion control fencing will be required around the wetlands. Additional erosion control may be necessary around the DNR wetland. 40 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 4. Verification of permit exemption shall be received from the DNR. 5. Wetland bank necessary for the project is completed in accordance with the WCA. 6. A feasibility study and design is included to enhance the DNR wetland if the plan proves to be efficient and acceptable. All voted in favor and the motion canied. NEW BUSINESS: Aanenson: I can give you the Director's Report under New Business if you'd like. Mancino: Okay. Aanenson: The City Council tabled the Perkins site plan review on their July 10th meeting based on the fact that the applicant wasn't there and they didn't have the visuals or the material samples and they felt uncomfortable and wanted some changes made to the plan. So that has been scheduled for this coming Monday, which is July 24th. The preliminary and final plat for Tim Erhart was approved. The three lot subdivision for Brendon Pond 2nd Addition was also approved. And they also reviewed the first reading of the glitch ordinance so that will be on the second reading on the 24th so hopefully we'll have some of those changes made. Also I included in your packet the recently adopted legislation and I also included a letter from the City Attorney as how they impacts the city. Just for your knowledge, the one 60 day requirement which is effective July 1st. It's the City Attorney's opinion that it doesn't have to be mutually acceptable. The applicant can put the applicant on notice that they need more time and so we've accomplished that by changing our application to say that most subdivision applications take longer than 60 days, or rezoning, so that will put them on notice that the 60 days may be exceeded. Also as far as the amendments to the land planning Act which requires the Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with the zoning ordinance. As you know, we do have some areas of inconsistency. Met Council still is possibly reviewing this because there will be a big cost as far as a lot of cities that haven't updated their plans, or need to, so they're going to be evaluating that. If they can accomplish reviewing all of the cities within that short timeframe. But as you're aware with the Highway 5, we rezone an area of the city. Looked at the 1995 study area, which we will be zoning but then our next step would be to bring it in so we're kind of going through mini Comp Plan amendments all the time anyways but we wanted to make sure that if we do something, we're consistent with what the new regulations are going to be and they haven't really formulated that, the Met Council, so we're kind of following what that all means to the city of Chanhassen. If there's questions on some of the other, I highlighted those from the League of 41 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Cities. Just kind of brief summary of some of the things that affect municipalities and the city of Chanhassen. Mancino: Thank you. When is the buffer yard ordinance going to the City Council? Generous: Monday. Aanenson: Yes. Bob and I had a very interesting meeting with the Builders Association. Would you say there was 12 members probably, approximately. It was a very fruitful discussion. We found some very interesting things. There was a lot said about the fact that people buy next, people develop next to industrial sites knowing the fact that the lots are discounted they shouldn't have to be buffered because that's the reason why those people moved there. Because they're getting a cheaper lot and they shouldn't be obligated to buffer because they got a cheaper lot, and we were kind of dumbfounded by that statement but they were very adamant against adopting the ordinance. We felt strongly, we reiterated the point that we feel like, at least on the collector streets, we need some more quantitative data to make sure we're getting that where we need it to be. And then the industrial buffering area. Whether or not, as we know, we struggle between low density and low density, whether or not that needed to be accomplished but there was some interesting statements made about the fact that we shouldn't have to buffer and so they will be at the City Council meeting on Monday night. Was there anything else you wanted to add about that discussion, Bob? Generous: No. Their point was the cost impacts that the ordinance would have on the developments and the practicality of fitting some of our buffer requirements on sites, more intensive sites. Especially the office warehouse over the multi-family. Aanenson: Then Lundgren also asked too, if you're doing a PUD, you know you try to do things more creative so if we're making all these requirements, how can you be more creative? But that's kind of the point why we said, well then why are you doing a PUD because we already require you to do that anyway. That goes back to the same argument we have and I think there are other fears that if we adopt something like that, well then all the other cities kind of follow suit to what we do and that's a big thing too. Farmakes: I think also, usually the losers in that situation are the ones who are in the existing structure. Aanenson: Right. Well, that's what we kept saying is, it goes back to the same argument we heard just tonight. The developer says, well that person bought a discounted lot. They wouldn't have been in that neighborhood except that the lot was cheaper because there was less buffering and it was next to industrial. But then we said, but the city's stuck with the 42 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 problem when the neighbors say, then they start complaining about the noise and so we're saying, it's our job to protect them so that was kind of, you know going back and forth and that sort of issue but they obviously didn't want the cost added on to their development and they got into the discussion how do you really...through buffering and lights and is it really health, safety and welfare so. Meyer: Did they give any numbers about how much is actually... Aanenson: Yeah, they were saying like $1,500.00-$2,000.00 a lot. Generous: They were using some of the numbers, the same numbers that I did. There was that one matrix where I had the cost with $200.00 for an overstory tree. Meyer: So they're saying $1,000.00? Aanenson: I think it was a little more than that. Generous: Yeah, it was. They did one proposal and they were looking at landscaping costs of $24,000.00, or $35,000.00 for a low development with the fencing and everything. I haven't been able to evaluate all their costs exactly so I'm not sure. Farmakes: I think that's interesting because usually when we see that, the adjacent zonement is still agricultural. It's still farm land and it's still, where do they come off discounting. Aanenson: Well no, if people adjacent to a road let's say. Well they bought that lot cheaper because it's adjacent to a road or, they bought that lot cheaper because there's industrial in the back and then why should we have to even go beyond that because that's lowering the price. So it was kind of a, it was good to hear those comments but it kind of, it kind of flies in the face of what we heard tonight too so. Mancino: Exactly. Aanenson: But the other issue we brought up too is, well we're struggling with now when we have single family that comes in next to single family and wants to be buffered from each other. I mean whether it's detached of same value, then they still want to be buffered, which we've seen recently too and how do we struggle with that? We've seen that in our recent subdivisions. Farmakes: It's unfortunate but perception is reality. It's hard to quantify. 43 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 Aanenson: So it was a good meeting. I think that was positive. Mancino: Good comments. Aanenson: They were very good comments from them. Generous: And they'll probably be there Monday night. So we encouraged that. And they brought up the three issues that you all specifically addressed those. We believe they'll probably table it... Aanenson: Maybe make some modifications to the ordinance. Mancino: That's a good idea. Well yes. After hearing tonight, especially when you have the residential comes in first. Boy is that hard. Farmakes: I think you should get some of the polystyrene cows that they have out...and place them in various places throughout the city. Mancino: Any other things? Aanenson: We'll have a full agenda again on the next, on the August 2nd. Probably as many items as we had this time and then the next one in August appears a little bit lighter. Mancino: Were you able, one of the, when I went to the last, I don't know if it was this last one but the time before, to the City Council meeting. They did not pass the Michael Byrne plat, Lake Lucy. The turned that down, so I wanted to say that. Mike, do you have anything to report from the HRA? You are the HRA person and I wanted to find out what was going on at the last HRA meeting. Meyer: I got there about a half hour late so I missed most of it. Oh man, I'll take better notes next time. Mancino: Okay, if you could. Meyer: I didn't see that there was anything that they really needed to pass onto us but. Mancino: Otherwise just give us kind of a general feel of what's going on. I went to the park referendum meeting. I did miss one and they're going ahead. It's a good committee of a lot of citizens and the last meeting that they had was with Roger Knutson and with the President of the Land Trust for Minnesota asking some questions about that. And what's 44 Planning Commission Meeting - July 19, 1995 next? I think that we meet next Thursday night on the park referendum and then after that meeting, I'll tell you more about it. We're just kind of getting into it and they have identified some land that they would like considered for the referendum and I haven't told you very much because I've only been to one meeting. But I will continue with that. Would anyone like to so note the Minutes from the last Planning Commission meeting? Falmakes moved, Meyer seconded to note the Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated June 21, 1995 as presented. Conrad moved, Peterson seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Planning Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 45 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM • TO: Planning Commission FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Planning Director DATE: August 2, 1995 SUBJ: Report from the Director On July 24, 1995, the City Council took the following action: 1. Approved the 2nd reading of the "glitch" code amendments. 2. Approved the final plat for 45 lots at the Oaks of Minnewashta. 3. Approved a preliminary plat extension for Olivewood Addition, 9 lots on Lake Minnewashta. 4. Approved the site plan for the Perkins Restaurant. 5. Tabled action on the buffer ordinance. The Council wanted staff to review the following issues; reduce the amount of landscaping on the upper end of the matrix, evaluate where the buffer is most important like between residential and commercial and industrial. The Metropolitan Council will be touring Prior Lake, Savage, Shakopee, Chaska and Chanhassen on Wednesday, August 2, 1995. The Metropolitan Council will be holding a meeting at Shakopee City Hall at 6:30 - 8:30 p.m. regarding "Suburban development and suburban schools." Unfortunately, this meeting conflicts with the Planning Commission meeting and I am unable to attend. INVITATION Development and Growth in the Twin Cities Region Community Meeting SCOTT AND CARVER COUNTIES Special focus: Suburban development and suburban schools Date: Wed., August 2, 1995 Community Meeting: 6:30-8:00 p.m., in the community room, Shakopee City Hall Cohosted by: Metropolitan Council and the Cities of Chanhassen, Chaska, Prior Lake, Savage and Shakopee Who should attend: Local government and school district officials, community and economic development representatives, and state legislators Development and Growth in the Twin Cities Region ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS FOR THE YEAR 2020 What will our region look like in the future? More than 330,000 new households are projected by the year 2020 in the seven-county region. The Metropolitan Council, with public participation, is exploring various scenarios for development and growth. By early 1996, one growth scenario depicting long-term physical growth and development patterns will be selected by the Council. This scenario will serve as the framework for further Regional Blueprint action and implementation of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, recently enacted into law. Please join the Council in a series of community meetings throughout the region and adjacent counties this summer. You will have an opportunity to be briefed on various development scenarios and to discuss trends, issues and visions for three growth scenarios: spread development, concentrated development and channel development. For more information, call Carole Peterson at 291-6559 or Donna Mattson at 291-6493. !RECEIVED • �v CITY 0!- CN ^:1-.-QSE.1`a ON-GOING ISSUES August 1995 ISSUE STATUS 1. Highway 5 Corridor Study and City Council has selected the southern Land Use Recommendation alignment. In June the council adopted the remaining portion of the Corridor Study. The document is in revised form and will be printed for final dispersement. 2. Southern 1995 Study Area: BF Staff is proposing to study the remaining District and remaining city land land outside of the MUSA. We will be uses outside of the MUSA Line. studying property in conjunction with the Park and Recreation Commission open space study. We will also be recommending land use by the end of 1995. In early 1996, we will begin evaluating the timing for the Planning Commission hearing process and determine how much, if any, area should be brought into the city's MUSA area. 3. Slope Protection Ordinance. The Planning Commission has held one work session on the proposed ordinance. Staff is making changes. 4. Revise PUD Ordinance. The standards of the PUD ordinance do not necessarily merit the increase in the flexibility it allows. Staff believes the PUD should be a process. Proposed changes are included in a Code glitch update. The Planning Commission has requested that the staff review the PUD separate from the "glitch " amendment. 5. Bluff Creek Study The next meetings scheduled for August 7, 1995. 6. Joint Meeting with Park and The joint meeting was held on 1/24/95. Recreation Commission 7. Affordable Housing Staff is exploring the affordable housing issue. We are examining what affordable housing is in the metro area and how Chanhassen fits into this issue. We are also monitoring the Metropolitan Council's new blue print as well as the 1995 Legislature for any housing mandates. 8. Train Depot The Planning Commission requested staff explore the possibility of moving the old train depot to the City Center, especially in light of the train that is providing the rides 9. Transition Zone The Planning commission requested that staff develop an ordinance for transition zones between different densities and intensities of use. The ordinance was reviewed at a work session. The city Council reviewed the proposed ordinance on July 24, 1995. The council tabled the item and staff will rewriting the ordinance. 2