Loading...
PC Staff Report 6-16-20PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Subject Consider a Request for Variances to Permit Construction of a Building on an Outlot and from the Standards Governing Water­Oriented Structures at 3920 White Oak Lane Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.1. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2020­08 PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to permit a building to be constructed on an outlot, approves a variance for a second water­oriented accessory structure, and denies the variance request to exceed the 250 square­foot water­oriented accessory structure size limit, subject to the Conditions of Approval and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions. SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is proposing to add on an 8­foot by 10­foot water­oriented accessory structure (WOAS) on their outlot. Due to the fact the buildings are not allowed on outlots, a variance is required to allow for the construction of a shed on this parcel. Additionally, there is already a 260­square foot patio located on the outlot. Since the City Code limits WOASs to a maximum size of 250 square feet and limits each property to a single structure, a 90­square foot maximum size variance and variance from the single structure limit would also be required. The applicant is requesting three variances. The first two, the variance from the prohibition on building on an outlot and the variance from the one WOAS limit, are consistent with the intent of the city’s Shoreland Management Ordinance and is necessitated by the unique nature of the applicant’s property. The reasons for granting these variances would not be broadly applicable to other properties and granting them would essentially allow the applicant to enjoy the same rights as other riparian property owners. The third variance is not justified by any circumstance unique to the applicant’s property and would allow the applicant a WOAS beyond what other riparian property owners are permitted.  A full discussion of the requested variances can be found in the attached staff report. APPLICANT Chad Lundeen 3920 White Oak Lane Excelsior, MN 55331 SITE INFORMATION PRESENT ZONING:  RSF­ Single Family Residential District PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, June 16, 2020SubjectConsider a Request for Variances to Permit Construction of a Building on an Outlot and from theStandards Governing Water­Oriented Structures at 3920 White Oak LaneSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.1.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: Planning Case No. 2020­08PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to permit a building to be constructed onan outlot, approves a variance for a second water­oriented accessory structure, and denies the variance request toexceed the 250 square­foot water­oriented accessory structure size limit, subject to the Conditions of Approval andadopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThe applicant is proposing to add on an 8­foot by 10­foot water­oriented accessory structure (WOAS) on their outlot.Due to the fact the buildings are not allowed on outlots, a variance is required to allow for the construction of a shed onthis parcel. Additionally, there is already a 260­square foot patio located on the outlot. Since the City Code limitsWOASs to a maximum size of 250 square feet and limits each property to a single structure, a 90­square footmaximum size variance and variance from the single structure limit would also be required.The applicant is requesting three variances. The first two, the variance from the prohibition on building on an outlot andthe variance from the one WOAS limit, are consistent with the intent of the city’s Shoreland Management Ordinanceand is necessitated by the unique nature of the applicant’s property. The reasons for granting these variances would notbe broadly applicable to other properties and granting them would essentially allow the applicant to enjoy the samerights as other riparian property owners. The third variance is not justified by any circumstance unique to the applicant’sproperty and would allow the applicant a WOAS beyond what other riparian property owners are permitted. A full discussion of the requested variances can be found in the attached staff report.APPLICANTChad Lundeen 3920 White Oak Lane Excelsior, MN 55331SITE INFORMATION PRESENT ZONING:  RSF­ Single Family Residential District LAND USE:Residential Low Density ACREAGE:  .55 acres, .13 acres  DENSITY:  NA  APPLICATION REGULATIONS Chapter 1, General Provisions Section 1­2, Rules of Construction and Definitions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article VII, Shoreland Management District Section 20­481, Placement, design, and height of structure Chapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” Single­Family Residential District Section 20­615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks BACKGROUND In December of 2000, the plat for the White Oak Addition subdivision was recorded, with the lots on the lakeside of Minnewashta Parkway being platted as outlots and required to be combined with the respective lot across the street. The goal of this designation was to prevent these lots from being sold as buildable lots. In July of 2001, the city approved a permit for the construction of a single­family home and attached garage at 3920 White Oak Lane. In April of 2017, the city approved a permit for the installation of a sand beach blanket on the outlot. Note: A patio was constructed on the outlot between 2005­2008 without a permit (dates based on aerial photos). Since the city did not require zoning permits for patios in 2007, staff cannot determine if the patio was legally installed before the permit requirement or illegally installed after the permit requirement went into force. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the first two variance requests and deny the third by adopting the following motion: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to permit a building to be constructed on an outlot, approves a variance for a second water­oriented accessory structure, and denies the variance request to exceed the 250 square­foot water­oriented accessory structure size limit, subject to the Conditions of Approval; and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions.” 1. No trees, shrubs or native vegetation shall be allowed to be cleared for the grading or construction of the building.  2. The applicant must apply for and receive a zoning permit. 3. The installation of the shed shall not encroach into any recorded drainage and utility easement associated with the outlot. 4. The combined area of both water­oriented accessory structures may not exceed 250 square feet. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, June 16, 2020SubjectConsider a Request for Variances to Permit Construction of a Building on an Outlot and from theStandards Governing Water­Oriented Structures at 3920 White Oak LaneSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.1.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: Planning Case No. 2020­08PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to permit a building to be constructed onan outlot, approves a variance for a second water­oriented accessory structure, and denies the variance request toexceed the 250 square­foot water­oriented accessory structure size limit, subject to the Conditions of Approval andadopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThe applicant is proposing to add on an 8­foot by 10­foot water­oriented accessory structure (WOAS) on their outlot.Due to the fact the buildings are not allowed on outlots, a variance is required to allow for the construction of a shed onthis parcel. Additionally, there is already a 260­square foot patio located on the outlot. Since the City Code limitsWOASs to a maximum size of 250 square feet and limits each property to a single structure, a 90­square footmaximum size variance and variance from the single structure limit would also be required.The applicant is requesting three variances. The first two, the variance from the prohibition on building on an outlot andthe variance from the one WOAS limit, are consistent with the intent of the city’s Shoreland Management Ordinanceand is necessitated by the unique nature of the applicant’s property. The reasons for granting these variances would notbe broadly applicable to other properties and granting them would essentially allow the applicant to enjoy the samerights as other riparian property owners. The third variance is not justified by any circumstance unique to the applicant’sproperty and would allow the applicant a WOAS beyond what other riparian property owners are permitted. A full discussion of the requested variances can be found in the attached staff report.APPLICANTChad Lundeen 3920 White Oak Lane Excelsior, MN 55331SITE INFORMATIONPRESENT ZONING:  RSF­ Single Family Residential DistrictLAND USE:Residential Low DensityACREAGE:  .55 acres, .13 acres DENSITY:  NA APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 1, General ProvisionsSection 1­2, Rules of Construction and DefinitionsChapter 20, Article II, Division 3, VariancesChapter 20, Article VII, Shoreland Management DistrictSection 20­481, Placement, design, and height of structureChapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” Single­Family Residential DistrictSection 20­615, Lot Requirements and SetbacksBACKGROUNDIn December of 2000, the plat for the White Oak Addition subdivision was recorded, with the lots on the lakeside ofMinnewashta Parkway being platted as outlots and required to be combined with the respective lot across the street.The goal of this designation was to prevent these lots from being sold as buildable lots.In July of 2001, the city approved a permit for the construction of a single­family home and attached garage at 3920White Oak Lane.In April of 2017, the city approved a permit for the installation of a sand beach blanket on the outlot.Note: A patio was constructed on the outlot between 2005­2008 without a permit (dates based on aerial photos).Since the city did not require zoning permits for patios in 2007, staff cannot determine if the patio was legally installedbefore the permit requirement or illegally installed after the permit requirement went into force.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the first two variance requests and deny the third by adoptingthe following motion:The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to permit a building to be constructed on anoutlot, approves a variance for a second water­oriented accessory structure, and denies the variance request to exceedthe 250 square­foot water­oriented accessory structure size limit, subject to the Conditions of Approval; and adoptsthe attached Findings of Facts and Decisions.”1. No trees, shrubs or native vegetation shall be allowed to be cleared for the grading or construction of thebuilding. 2. The applicant must apply for and receive a zoning permit.3. The installation of the shed shall not encroach into any recorded drainage and utility easement associated with theoutlot.4. The combined area of both water­oriented accessory structures may not exceed 250 square feet. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact and Decision Variance Document Development Review Application Narrative Survey Photos Engineering Memo ERS Memo CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: June 16, 2020 CC DATE: July 13, 2020 REVIEW DEADLINE: July 14, 2020 CASE #: 2020-08 BY: MYW SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is proposing to add on an 8-foot by 10- foot WOAS on their outlot. Due to the fact the buildings are not allowed on outlots, a variance is required to allow for the construction of a shed on this parcel. Additionally, there is already a 260 square foot patio located on the outlot. Since the City Code limits WOASs to a maximum size of 250 square feet and limits each property to a single structure, a 90-square foot maximum size variance and variance from the single structure limit would also be required. LOCATION: 3920 White Oak Lane (PID 258300010) Outlot A, White Oak Addition (PID 258300060) OWNER: Chad Lundeen 3920 White Oak Lane Excelsior, MN 55331 PRESENT ZONING: RSF 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density ACREAGE: .55 acres, .13 acres DENSITY: NA LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The city has a relatively high PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to permit a building to be constructed on an outlot, approves a variance for a second water-oriented accessory structure (WOAS), and denies the variance request to exceed the 250 square foot water-oriented accessory structure size limit, subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions.” Planning Commission 3920 White Oak Lane Variances Page 2 level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant owns two parcels, one of which is Lot 1, Block 1 of the White Oak Addition and the other is Outlot A of the White Oak Addition. Lot 1, Block 1 has a single-family home and the Outlot provides that home with access to Lake Minnewashta. Currently, there is a 260-square foot patio on the outlot which was constructed by the home’s previous owner. The applicant is requesting a variance to construct an 8-foot by 10-foot WOAS, specifically a storage shed, on riparian property. The applicant is proposing to install the shed near the northern property line where it will be screened from view by existing vegetation. Since the property is an outlot, they will need a variance from the city’s prohibition on constructing buildings on outlots, a variance from Shoreland Management Ordinance’s limits of one WOAS per property, and a variance from the Shoreland Management Ordinance’s 250 square foot WOAS maximum size limit. The applicant intends to use the shed to store kayaks, paddleboards, fishing equipment, and other similar items near the water. The applicant has noted that their home is over 300 feet from the lake and that it can be dangerous crossing Minnewashta Parkway with children and equipment. Additionally, the shed would allow them to securely store items on the outlot when they are not in use. They have also noted that there are many similar structures, some significantly bigger than what they are proposing, along the shore of Lake Minnewashta and that adding a small shed to their parcel would not change the character of the area. Finally, they have stated that their goal in requesting this variance is to have the same rights and ability to use their riparian lot as other lakeshore owners. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 1, General Provisions Section 1-2, Rules of Construction and Definitions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Planning Commission 3920 White Oak Lane Variances Page 3 Chapter 20, Article VII, Shoreland Management District Section 20-481, Placement, Design, and Height of Structure Chapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” Single-Family Residential District Section 20-615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks BACKGROUND In December of 2000, the plat for the White Oak Addition subdivision was recorded, with the lots on the lakeside of Minnewashta Parkway being platted as outlots and required to be combined with the respective lot across the street. The goal of this designation was to prevent these lots from being sold as buildable lots. In July of 2001, the city approved a permit for the construction of a single-family home and attached garage at 3920 White Oak Lane. In April of 2017, the city approved a permit for the installation of a sand beach blanket on the outlot. Note: A patio was constructed on the outlot between 2005-2008 without a permit (dates based on aerial photos). Since the city did not require zoning permits for patios in 2007, staff cannot determine if the patio was legally installed before the permit requirement or illegally installed after the permit requirement went into force. SITE CONDITIONS The property is zoned Single-Family Residential (RSF) District and is located within the Shoreland Management District. This zoning classification requires lots to be a minimum of 15,000 square feet, 20,000 if riparian, with a minimum lot width of 90 feet and a minimum lot depth of 125 feet, have front and rear yard setbacks of 30 feet, side yard setbacks of 10 feet, and limits parcels to a maximum of 25 percent lot cover. Residential structures are limited to 35 feet in height. Riparian properties are allowed one water-oriented structure not to exceed 10 feet in height and 250 square feet in area. The property also includes an outlot which is not subject to minimum lot depth, width, and area standards. Lot 1, Block 1 is a 23,958 square foot flag lot with an estimated lot cover of 24.65 percent. The home appears to meet all required setbacks. Outlot A is 5,662 square foot parcel with an estimated lot cover of 4.6 percent and an existing patio that exceeds the 250 square foot size limit for accessory structures by 10 square feet. NEIGHBORHOOD White Oak Addition Planning Commission 3920 White Oak Lane Variances Page 4 The plat for this area was recorded in December of 2000 and created 5 lots and 2 outlots. A condition of approval for the subdivision was that Outlots A and B be combined with Lots 1 and 2, respectively, to provide those properties with lake access without allowing for the possibility that homes could be constructed on the riparian parcels. As this is a newer subdivision, the homes were built under the current zoning code and there do not appear to be many non- conforming properties in the subdivision and surrounding area. Variances within 500 feet: There are no known variances within 500 feet of 3920 White Oak Lane. ANALYSIS Request At A Glance City Code Applicant’s Request Staff’s Recommendation Building on an outlot Not allowed Allowed Allowed No. of WOAS 1 2 2 Maximum Size of WOAS 250 sq. ft. 340 sq. ft. 250 sq. ft. Building on an Outlot The city required the White Oak Addition subdivision to plat the lots abutting Lake Minnewashta as outlots and required that those lots be linked to the respective lots across the street in order to prevent those lots from being sold as separate buildable lots. The intent was for Outlot A and Outlot B to provide the owners of Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 1 with lake access without allowing for the possibility that a single-family home could be constructed on the riparian lots. Applicant’s Lots and Approximate Location of Proposed Shed The city had to require these lots be plated as outlots rather than as part of their respective lots due to the fact that the city’s definition of lot does not allow for the creation of lots bisected by road right-of-ways. Since the definition of an outlot precludes the construction of a building, the applicants require a variance to install a shed on the parcel. Were it not for the fact that the parcel is an outlot, the city’s Shoreland Management Ordinance would allow for the construction of a shed in Planning Commission 3920 White Oak Lane Variances Page 5 the proposed location. Staff believes that allowing the applicant the same rights to construct a WOAS that other riparian property owners in the city enjoy, would be consistent with the intent of platting the parcel as an outlot and requiring it to be linked to Lot 1, Block 1. Granting a variance to allow a shed to be constructed would not in any way undermine the city’s ability to prevent a home from being constructed on the parcel. The applicant has also noted that their intent in requesting the variance is to minimize the risks of traversing Minnewashta Parkway by allowing them to securely store items on the riparian portion of their property, rather than continually having to try to cross the road with these items. Staff acknowledges that there are increased safety risks associated with attempting to cross a road while encumbered. For these reasons, staff recommends approving the requested variance to construct a building on the outlot. Second Water-Oriented Structure The City Code permits residents to construct a WOAS within the required 75-foot shoreland setback, so long as it is setback 10 feet from the ordinary high water level and 10 feet from the property’s side lot line. The code also specifies that the structure should be designed and located so as to reduce its visibility from the lake and adjacent properties, suggesting that vegetation, topography, setbacks, or color should be used to accomplish this. Currently, the outlot has an existing WOAS in the form of a patio and fire pit that is located in the center of the outlot. The city’s policy is that if a resident wants to have both a patio and storage building within the 75-foot shoreland setback, the two must be connected and meet all other requirements, i.e. size, height, and setbacks, of the WOAS ordinance. In this case, the applicant is requesting to locate the shed 10 feet from the north side lot line. The applicant has stated that this location is screened from the lake by the existing vegetation and from the road by the outlot’s topography. They believe that the proposed location will be less obtrusive than requiring the shed to be located on or immediately adjacent to the patio and fire pit in the center of the outlot. Planning Commission 3920 White Oak Lane Variances Page 6 Staff feels the goal of limiting residents to a single structure is to prevent the shoreline from becoming visually cluttered with many small buildings. Since the proposed location is significantly less visible than a location meeting the single structure requirement, staff believes that the applicant’s proposed location for the shed meets the intent of the shoreland management ordinance by significantly reducing the visual profile of the building. For these reasons, staff supports the requested variance to allow a second water-oriented structure. Accessory Structure Maximum Size The outlot has an existing 260 square foot patio and fire pit that was installed between 2005 and 2008. There is no permit on file for the structure; however, since permits were not required for patios until 2007, it may have been constructed legally without a permit. This patio and fire pit is considered to be the outlot’s WOAS and exceeds the 250 square foot maximum size limit. The applicant is requesting a variance to add a second 80-square foot WOAS structure to the property which would increase the total size of the parcel’s WOASs to 340 square feet. The intent behind the limited Shoreland Management District’s 75-foot structure setback and limit on the size of the WOAS within that area is to minimize the amount of impervious surface present near lakes. While an additional 80 square feet of impervious surface on one property is not likely to pose a danger to water quality, the precedent it establishes and cumulative impact of allowing riparian properties to exceed this limit could be. Staff is supportive of the applicant’s first two requested variances because they are in line with the intent of the Shoreland Management Ordinance, are necessitated by the unique nature of the applicant’s parcel, and granting them will allow the applicant the same use of their riparian property that other homeowners are entitled to. Unlike the first two requests, the request to exceed the 250 square foot maximum WOAS size limit does not have its genesis in the unique nature of the applicant’s parcel and is not in line with the intent of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. All riparian properties are subject to the 250-square foot limit and all owners must balance their desire for patio space with their desire for storage space. Since the applicant can remove 90 square feet of patio to permit the construction of the proposed shed within the ordinances’ limits, staff does not believe that permitting the applicant to increase the extent of their existing non-conformity is in keeping with the intent of the City Code. Planning Commission 3920 White Oak Lane Variances Page 7 For these reasons, staff recommends denying the requested variance to exceed the 250-square foot WOAS size limit. Impact on Neighborhood Outlot A, the proposed location of the WOAS, is separated from single-family homes by Minnewashta Parkway and the other riparian parcels along that section of the lake are all lots or outlots that provide associated single-family homes or homeowners associations with lake access. Since the parcel already has a dock and patio, the addition of a small shed screened by the outlot’s vegetation is not anticipated to impact the intensity of use on the lake or the visual presentation of the outlot as viewed from the lake. Staff believes permitting the applicant to construct the shed in the proposed location would be consistent with the current character and use of the area; however, staff feels that permitting the applicant to exceed the 250 square foot size limit for WOAS would establish a precedent that could alter the character of the city’s riparian properties. SUMMARY The applicant is requesting three variances. The first two, the variance from the prohibition on building on an outlot and the variance from the one WOAS limit, are consistent with the intent of the city’s Shoreland Management Ordinance and necessitated by the unique nature of the applicant’s property. The reasons for granting these variances would not be broadly applicable to other properties and granting them would essentially allow the applicant to enjoy the same rights as other riparian property owners. The third variance is not justified by any circumstance unique to the applicant’s property and would allow the applicant a WOAS beyond what other riparian property owners are permitted. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the first two variance requests and deny the third by adopting the following motion: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to permit a building to be constructed on an outlot, approves a variance for a second water-oriented accessory structure, and denies the variance request to exceed the 250 square foot water-oriented accessory structure size limit, subject to the Conditions of Approval and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions.” 1. No trees, shrubs or native vegetation shall be allowed to be cleared for the grading or construction of the building. 2. The applicant must apply for and receive a zoning permit. 3. The installation of the shed shall not encroach into any recorded drainage and utility easement associated with the outlot. 4. The combined area of both water-oriented accessory structures may not exceed 250 square feet. Planning Commission 3920 White Oak Lane Variances Page 8 ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Decision 2. Variance Document 3. Development Review Application and Narrative 4. 3920 White Oak Lane Survey 5. Photos 6. Engineering Memo 7. ERS Memo G:\PLAN\2020 Planning Cases\20-08 3920 White Oak Lane VAR\Staff Report-3920 White Oak Lane_PC.doc 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of Chad Lundeen to construct an 8-foot by 10-foot water-oriented accessory structure (WOAS) on an outlot zoned Single-Family Residential District (RSF) - Planning Case 2020-08. On June 16, 2020, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential District (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Outlot A, White Oak Addition 4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: Chapter 20 intends for riparian property owners to be able to construct small, up to 250 square foot, WOASs within the 75-foot shoreland setback. The ordinance requires that each parcel be limited to one WOAS and that the structure be located so as to reduce its visibility from the lake. The applicant’s request to construct an 8-foot by 10- foot storage shed on the outlot providing lake access for his home is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The applicant’s request to allow the shed to be separate from the existing patio is also consistent with the intent of the ordinance, as it will allow the shed to be placed in a less conspicuous location where it is screened by vegetation. Finally, the city’s intent in platting this parcel as an outlot was not to prevent it from allowing the activaties typically associated with lake access, i.e. dock, swimming, etc., but rather to prevent the future construction of a home at this location. The requested variances are in line with the intended use of the parcel. 2 That being said, the Shoreland Management Ordinance limits the size of WOASs to reduce the amount of impervious surface installed near lakes and to prevent the construction of large visually obtrusive WOASs. Owners of lakeshore property must choose how to divide their 250 square feet between patio, decking, and storage uses. It would not meet the intent of the ordinance to allow the applicant to exceed the 250 square foot size limit, rather than require that they reduce the size of the existing WOAS. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The city’s definition of an outlot does not permit the construction of a building on an outlot; however, the city’s Shoreland Management Ordinance allows riparian property owners to construct a WOAS. The applicant’s proposal to construct a small storage shed is reasonable and would be permitted if not for the fact that the parcel is an outlot. The applicant’s request to exceed the 250 square foot WOAS size limit is in excess of what riparian properties are typically allowed, and the applicant could install the shed while still meeting the requirements of the zoning code by removing a portion of the existing patio. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The parcel was platted as an outlot to allow for lake access without the possibility of a single-family home being constructed. The applicant’s inability to construct a storage shed on the property is the unintended consequence of this made during the subdivision process. The applicant’s request to exceed the 250 square foot maximum size limit for a WOAS, is the result of the presence of an existing 260 square foot patio, also considered a WOAS, on the property. While the applicant did not install this patio, there is nothing preventing the applicant from removing a portion of the patio to eliminate the conflict with the ordinance’s maximum size limit. There is no circumstance unique to the property that would justify permitting a larger WOAS. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The proposed location of the WOAS is separated from single-family homes by Minnewashta Parkway and the other riparian parcels along that section of the lake are all lots or outlots that provide associated single-family homes or homeowners associations with 3 lake access. Since the parcel already has a dock and patio, the addition of a small shed screened by the outlot’s vegetation is not anticipated to impact the intensity of use on the lake or the visual presentation of the outlot as viewed from the lake; however, permitting the applicant to exceed the 250 square foot size limit for a WOAS would establish a precedent that could alter the character of the city’s riparian properties. f. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2020-08, dated June 16, 2020, prepared by MacKenzie Young-Walters, is incorporated herein. DECISION “The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to permit a building to be constructed on an outlot, approves a variance for a second water-oriented accessory structure, and denies the variance request to exceed the 250 square foot water-oriented accessory structure size limit, subject to the following conditions: 1. No trees, shrubs or native vegetation shall be allowed to be cleared for the grading or construction of the building. 2. The applicant must apply for and receive a zoning permit. 3. The installation of the shed shall not encroach into any recorded drainage and utility easement associated with the outlot. 4. The combined area of both water-oriented accessory structures may not exceed 250 square feet. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 16th day of June, 2020. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Steven Weick, Chairman g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-08 3920 white oak lane var\findings of fact and decision 3920 white oak lane_var (approval).docx 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2020-08 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to permit a building to be constructed on an outlot, approves a variance for a second water-oriented accessory structure, and denies the variance request to exceed the 250 square foot water- oriented accessory structure size limit. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as Outlot A, White Oak Addition. 3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. No trees, shrubs or native vegetation shall be allowed to be cleared for the grading or construction of the building. 2. The applicant must apply for and receive a zoning permit. 3. The installation of the shed shall not encroach into any recorded drainage and utility easement associated with the Outlot. 4. The combined area of both water-oriented accessory structures may not exceed 250 square feet. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. 2 Dated: June 16, 2020 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: (SEAL) Elise Ryan, Mayor AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2020 by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-08 3920 white oak lane var\variance document 20-08.doc COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division— 7700 Market Boulevard OF CHANHASSNMailingAddress— P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317CITY Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952)227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date j 15 J 4-' PC Date: ! I G., I w CC Date:, f 311 .0 60-Day Review Date: .-1( l`1 1 ,3-e-- Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) Comprehensive Plan Amendment 600 Subdivision (SUB) Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers $100 Create 3 lots or less 300 Create over 3 lots 600 + $15 per lot Conditional Use Permit(CUP) lots) Single-Family Residence 325 Metes & Bounds (2 lots) 300 All Others 425 Consolidate Lots 150 Lot Line Adjustment 150 Interim Use Permit (IUP) Final Plat 700 In conjunction with Single-Family Residence..$325 Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)* All Others 425 Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. Rezoning (REZ) Planned Unit Development (PUD) 750 Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way(VAC) $300 Minor Amendment to existing PUD 100 Additional recording fees may apply) All Others 500 0 Variance (VAR) 200 Sign Plan Review 150 Wetland Alteration Permit(WAP) Site Plan Review (SPR) Single-Family Residence 150 Administrative 100 All Others 275 Commercial/Industrial Districts* 500 Zoning Appeal 100 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: thousand square feet) Zoning Ordinance Amendment(ZOA) 500 Include number of existing employees: Include number of new employees: Residential Districts 500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. Plus $5 per dwelling unit (units) sits Notification Sign (City to install and remove) 200 El Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre-application meeting)3 per address 29 addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) 50 per document Conditional Use Permit NN[ 1] Interim Use Permit ElSite Plan Agreement Vacation Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) Easements ( easements) Deeds TOTAL FEE: $537.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Request for variance to the no-building clause on our outlot on the east side of MinnewashtaPkwy. We would like to add a water-oriented accessory structure (small '8 x '10 storage shed) Property Address or Location: 3920 White Oak Lane; Excelsior MN 55331 Parcel #:258300010 Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1 White Oak Addition: Outlot A Total Acreage: 0.55 Wetlands Present? Yes No El Zoning: Single-Family Residential District (R - Requested Zoning: Not Applicable Residential Low Densn Re nested Land Use Designation: Residential Low DensityPresentLandUseDesignation: q Existing Use of Property: Detached Single-Family OCheck box if separate narrative is attached. iYy'd Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I. as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This applicationshouldbeprocessedinmynameandIamthepartywhomtheCityshouldcontactregardinganymatterpertainingtothis application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed ofthedeadlinesforsubmissionofmaterialandtheprogressofthisapplication. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Chad and Lindsay Lundeen Contact: Chad Address: 3920 White Oak Lane Phone: City/State/Zip: Excelsior, MN 55331 Cell: 612) 327-7096 Email: lundeenc@vikings.nfl.net Fax: Signature: Date: 5/13/20 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? Other Contact Information: O Property Owner Via: EI Email E Mailed Paper Copy Name:Lindsay Lundeen Ej Applicant Via: [' Email Mailed Paper Copy Address: same as above Engineer Via: Email Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: lindsavlundeen a(gmail.com Other' Via: El Email El Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. 'RINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORK to send a digital copy to the city for processing. SAVE FORM PRINT FORD 1 .11BMIT FORM Variance Application: Written Narrative Attachment Lundeen: 3920 White Oak Lane; Excelsior MN 55331 Lot 1, Block 1 White Oak Addition, Outlot A To Whom It May Concern: Our property is split into two separate lots and is divided by Minnewashta Parkway. Our home is on the west side of the Parkway and our lakeshore lot, termed an "outlot" is on the east side of the Parkway on Lake Minnewashta. We are requesting a variance to the no-building clause for an outlot. We would like to build a small 8' x 10' storage shed near the lake to keep water accessory equipment such as paddle boards, fishing equipment, life jackets, skis,tubes, a paddle boat, etc. The garage on our home is 300+feet from our lake shore and currently, we carry the kayak, paddle board,fishing rods and other equipment back and forth each time we use them. This is not only inconvenient, but it becomes dangerous at times crossing the road.The Parkway curves near our property and many vehicles don't adhere to the 30 MPH speed limit. Inevitably, our three children (ages 6, 9, 11) are involved in carrying the equipment to/from the lake.We would like to reduce the risk of a catastrophic accident occurring crossing the road. We have chosen not to keep the items unsecured, in the open,at the lakeshore for the summer due to potential theft.We are within eyesight of the public beach and pier, allowing many people to see us use the equipment during the day.We also don't have clear vision of our lakeshore from the house, making it more difficult to secure or keep an eye on our items or personal property. We have read and understand the code Section 20-481, "e" sub-section 2 "water-oriented accessory structures" In addition to this written narrative, we have included several photos of our waterfront and proposed location for the small water-oriented accessory structure.These photos will help demonstrate the following: o Show how the trees and growth will help hide the view of the shed when looking at the lakeshore from on the lake o There is currently a wood pile and paddle boat near the area we would locate the shed, and both are barely visible in a photo taken from the dock(in early May) o Show the proposed location is hidden from the road due to steep change in elevation o There is no problem meeting the setbacks of'10 from water and '30 feet from road o Sample structure with the desired look of potential shed o Show the existing patio and fire pit When we purchased the home and property in June of 2019,there was an existing patio and fire pit near the lakeshore. It is essentially shaped as two merging circles (see photos). After some careful math (A = Trr2) and estimates, we believe the total area to be approximately 260 square feet.Thus, we are requesting a second variance to the max area of 250 sq. ft.for such structures. Our new total would be about 340 sq. ft. This small shed would not change the character of this piece of land. It would simply help us to use the lakeshore for the appropriate recreation, as it was intended. Our goal is to have the same rights as any other homeowner on the lake,to have a water-oriented accessory structure near the lakeshore to store equipment such as life jackets,fishing poles, paddle boards, floaties and other items. The only reason we are prevented from having this right is because our lake lot is separated from us by Minnewashta Parkway and is defined as an "outlot". The city has developed rules to protect this open space and prevent someone from building a home or large structure on the lot, which makes perfect sense. As we go around our beautiful lake, we see many such structures, in varying shapes and sizes. Granting us this variance would not alter this rule or its intention. Granting us this variance would allow us to use our lakeshore as it is intended to be used and create a safer environment for our family in the process. Thank you very much for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 0:Le ivrkl ify e, LAI ) Efol 5 6 Chad, Lindsay, Eveyln,Titus and Eloise Lundeen 4' -s2 jam 4, N2 N O 3b"?/ Fao wa •j., s wLo o1111i 1A o1 TA-'q Iws05 -?,? moCUo . CD e1' line 1.0 rn x rD OSki 7;1 Oe fee tMNO•HRNO• k 19?9) uxiw IO- r+ cc On N CD0I III 0 CL III 1111 o' o O c CO F Q D n 1, au G eL r n r-f- Q a O m Q D D 2 4. 1 •'''.- .:.:.•:..:,.A : ':-!--):A,,1:4, ..:0/../. ._..,,..le 0';' 4.' i ',-'• #. ' ele•. #444 , * 1*A'----''''''' - ,- ' -••, ''','-' ,4'`,.,,A, • a z,\,..-.7i• . .. - ! , •..`.1 1,,p's,.. i 1 it 1 -42 (WO'' 7.• - 4.- •,-: '":9 tr...,';-7, ,L*1 .. i ii i' '• --lf- -‘, .• .., , -04- ,k5? 4-41- r: w - .1;Art• -•'.‹, : ::- < fli '---Y.ii,41.'-'i.i.• - '.-ii.: a AN.:-.A 01 - .ift- ..e6.- :tivii:", , 4, • .411L44•%•,; , .40M,;:t+...4It AYA"1:',..,.....P.,,AP: .7 ,.... 4j3.-7.."%•;,..`• .:-. C '-'' .' N's.•-":24;Ya%'P''-:'-•:' • Ai 4', Ti,-/;t6.4140k te 4 i A/ -:-, 11,r.,-'. :.• il 4.•••z AT:-.14-- 0,-%-wr,;.4!...,,,,-..--,:4: • • -._,- ....,, .--.•t. , .i, ...,..•1 .: - c•i .e.:ft?;-. •,i-•*- ,;*,.-7.4!-At_.i.--_( i--,:, ,•''-.-:,,..i.:.*,-..r. •----,' -6-Li-:.i.,.._,;•, '4,„•) -,' 4-,:.),- . .....,':- . 54_;•: i-.,.,--.._.• 7,-,.7*,. 7:e.:', .‘111.1,' -"r 1,_ •- .4"':f li,p;S1. ."IP.> e:41kx'4,t ,'...*'-.-1:41',.'.W...4. rk• •••';',1.--igr,,,s4;1.7441.,--.. ..-!ir , ._... - _ -_p lii-Ifett ,- i ?kg 4' '3:0-04----,.g'4''•''.4..:;4.- •'l'%;•.--` ••.-.=.v7.`,.•=.,-;:---• --;., %,,%,A'... 4,44s_ •A.r."' ‘_ AL''.--',--•tf-'••--.1-. •:'„Wciit. A.,-,.-,.:,_,•- '44 v! =1,17. ,,i--,.. ,- __0..-..--. :•::•..,..,-. - - ... 7-' - , _.::t". ..-,.F:...;::-.. .i.„..i...,.....-.,,-.,,,t_._,7,..7,-,.Ligc-•••tillg'-'3.'t -'',."4 '...;.t':"1.:. :.:-',.i.,...-.,..-,-; 1,_"• _•-'' .., iii'''''''-'-‘:: '\ ''.1. '''' T,"04.67-M1 ..i.:-.k.1 0,--:•if 4.- 4„ ,: rt* 11'.''-1414,64-4.•' '''',1: i.:'-'----- '7'- '-'r;•7W., .1 .--'.72. *.:`, ,- E'si).--A.09.i7:-•,;;: -'00 Kge,, 2-00:•;74.1-1114# ,:".=''i'7, • ..-. 'il. :t,',A"---4:•.....:•',-;---tt•.,.;,,..'!'.;fr. ',:::.,,':- • . .„..4,,N.:..„. !Ili -i-,1: 1 4* -<-'.44, ii,---).v; _...--1 k.--,-;...i.,--.4":,11. z W74r-.;.' i,..„,r - • 0.--:,7-.: -;ak,14:- -rf. -. - 1,.. 1,it 0;.,.. ...:.•• ,-7... '_?_t-4. ... -:-"..,,,z--. --..,v-z-__,,- 4-,-. •t 'I'S:4 z,,, ,-...4.;•.-. .,-:.., • 7,c..411*. - A% ..4- /.'":- - _•-_;.,_i fwa wow Am 5,...,k --,-!"..----4_-_,.4.-... ,-._?::,•fy,::4,,Ir•-- ..,;--5,41,.• .. ..;A: , •:.-• ...-. i•,- ;-- • ,r.t.., ik .. A ..1, __..--: , iv.lam !„...i•tiN- 1 - .,- ",'4,-.4%,--ez" .:;•-.-47*....-,-..:ffril ---• .-,..,- rt--;"`: -.,-:-.-,--.. --...,, .0, - - - t . If 4, 1#•;.,•114,•,---c..- - '• - - - , -5,;:.4i;?•,?..k...,.$4. 0.Y1 - .-. 4.iltg. 1. A 0- '. .- '.4--It- l‘iY;': --Aigies' -1.14,414-i•,'.. .;,kift,......445:,5,---'''',.‘'-:: ' • •A,'-'4-4..;i',-•,_i,:-.0:. r;:-; . .--:.- .?.-:"---*- 7.'.• ;"%.' v'_:-cyt iti 4---- . ' ''''.- -•,if„-,..-- -:N.-vx.. /A, /. :141.---7 ,.:---t--n--•..," 167,„ "- A. .-4.7•.-.- 1 s-•_;•-•q, 4`*-- -. ..-- - -- r':'•"-, 42._-7-: - - .'-,.-* .. i4:7---,t-rqJ.- s„..,iik-. :- ..$4.- -...... r<-,e4 iv ,i. ,•,;,., i :4-qpip fa ...: -'•..' ;;---; '', i ' --s. . ' .4"•----''-- -1 Irri -=''' -- -'-A4 ''''' '-' •44-.71-i ..-:,-.-'•..---,43C.- ile'. fi'::•:..-1:3-::-i-- 1.44-7,-:.. 1- ' • '-::-. .-'`•i'' ,.;..1,-t•,k•-?" ''..;!,' 7 ...r. . L-; -,,,, ,..."- e- - '-_-,-,---• - --- -- - - •---- -- •- kla,:=44-..... ,c,.: ,;.-.P...'_-........ 4„;: t•-,, ,, •-•.. i4. i, ... k.i, 745- 0.0. . .---.,.:-117;?t,-• L-' --i" -"e---,. .,.4.-! t•--. t,. -:. i ;-.,,_-....3,- Alk - -'f•-';...-4:-..-,‘,.. -,-....,-;„ .-: . .,. • 4.-• ,,,.._ 11- ---.-:.",--.-;-•... . '.--.:r.,.-....*7"- .. ..---. 40,---. 441.4 .' 1=1.7..-.7.1. 4` - -...;::::".:, " N'. S. .:; I: x. 11 -----;-- . . OP 7::-.2":".--:-.''4‘--,71:i.-' ':7t !.-- ? 2' 7.• : ''.._ •'''----.--- 7-Z7--:".-- -:•1-il'AY: r:11 : : :4:;- r'..: :- --'.9.-: "1-t•-• 410..r..,....-• • ... -' '111 t-,-,•- -,.., .i. ,,, 5.,,---. ., .„4-. 1;'..-:'Ve' _ . 4.... r.„. 1-, ,_.',..•,,,--*--:-.1„---,T-Le.AZ • ,,i;--%-; ' • •'. . m"-. ' .A04. 4.4,..,*-**1 :I* -,-,:;c•--.'-- _! , i?.--. --,--' , , 4, t,:fly-, ,7,.....-4_,, ..--•••:-.. ,• ,;_•r ,,...-, ....- _.--...„...-14:. 1, -.. .• - - '"I.:-i-0_...!.'-',..,-. ' •.0'.'w. 7--.. • ..- ....- gailir'''': ' 4.- . _,. _ _ 1---.?': .1.‘, .._ • -_...` 52.:-', '-: •'..;''_ l''...-.1; ' --'...---.1ti, ..-",• .- ki,' ., - E .i.INC;,1-'":„War air...`-' 7 ... - 7... .,. ,_,'.. .., per 7,,X.' - -- -. 7•...,..•,,,,•- • ...;',.,i:.,.., ..,,,-,,%r°?••....-*-;-.,.--' .:•!,1- ::, 4* ' --- .. 7t-4•-*,..,...!-.."." V'‘.::. :,.- -!'.'-•. AL.!1...- r-.7--.•:.--,- ,... .-_:... .-- •-. 5- --- .------ - -_,--- VIA.JrCile4-„. ••'''''•-,•-•-- '--- 11.-7*i.r.,.7--;- - -';''''-i'--•"`r- 1---.--,---,,-.----- .,_----,f.-...-:.----z.-_-.-_-_---- , 1.-- -"''' 2,40...... ,.- - _ ---10;---.= ,,. .-• i.....;....--.-.- ,------7---=--..- -- . --.- - --=--__.--4:-----;_.. 1.----=..-t-.11...a9!3:.:_,:ig--„..-, .. .„,-...%-..: ...7m-L-----7,f, - ,. -. - ,----.- -- _- .--- .,-.•.;-., 7.;... k A, - - '------'- - ''' - ---,.•.--------i-i--,.---,-''-'''--: .1.- .- -.,. -,•dr.; rw: ..,:,,,....k. .. __....-- _..,,,..'--.-'•- _.. j.:-......frff,-4,'-_;.0,„--i,-;:-.:---,e...:7, t ,:.- - -*•71'. '" .;.• .' -4 .*:•• -..- - - - - --*--;-;,...--- ----'-': A*4ir..-. ..-- _- • ‘.. ,.,- ••. Nallept. z-1,4,...;....,_ _ .---„2 -7. -7-.:-•,..- -",.'.- • y....-,. ‘„......!--. ..,..._;,,,,,....F.._ . . ,.. . mi c‘. ''' t*'-- 1--.. __aliera•e,„ , ',. - ' ..- ., . .'-- .: li-'1 .,.'1..*.*1'1:-,....... -',........7.7.‘-.,,, -... ....,...--' ' .,--s--.-- -I:, A;.# 1`;7_,ATtilet- -' -`; AL.-- 4... -'" 41-1164.;- -. ._ ...-7-;-" r_-..- ISA-7:' '...:',....-.. .., ,}_:_, --- -'.21'---t, r-' s .7.'-...--. ..'‘.W-41,•:-..7..-*-.7--.---7.--'1altt. -'.4'-',: -A•,•-, _ ' 2,-_ '4de.4* , --.:- 't.'' L..-,..: ' . -.: ,% B.' , - ,. .Illr- '..". .. - •••'..it--... 1.6. '.....".. 16. ,--------W":4Y. '-'-',7 7%,Itt:.44-A,te... ' I: i- 'X';$..-. 30441r, 1.41114.-- 119... 0.7.r-/,,•,-.., t.:.:- •• ' -- * ---'•--- -.:-... •_- '1. - *'----.**--'- * - - 4* -,--- r- - %.,-."--•---• •-••• --;,.--:. =-."..• ih. -AA ----- - . uk-*; giiiiiik-4,Eic 0 -117,i(•,••••T:-_- - I. Ikish..11434=•• - - - ----•-•' W.N.sx-p- N.„.--: If -• i,.ihlt".4 Vf.ft•,4.,:t' 444 VI44%. 7-'''!.0.1•;." 200 K.\ -r.‘ • - .... aIr• f'4INFts ' \ p.,1 t:+2....• 4-k(..... 1,3 C Ck k"):ti t4:koki.‘"‘ \Di trees fr.i,AL. dgy,l .., Al 1 5erivn 3c66)-0-... Lt.. bo.,4-Also A 04, cocoetr A-1 1'At. e-% .4.4-444 ‘,:i ittro j 61„K. 5().2A- , vi ez+.1(x)-(3 o-pact r rrPii1 - ii vf' xi' f r t „ r' 9fr , :. LII: 46.1a•" ' a ,?9 dss'7^L2e ir tk:off 1 'i.fin•,<s y , 4,v,,e ; .: + W- ytstB, •i ter•, 9oNs 1-.': t fiA, -. 'aii%,--Atr4 1-t. If_ mo` i:-- .:, 4 to`,•-,,, t. 4. e, y p . t O Ey44'` ,VL s 1-- :-,',- • 17414,44V44, ;4174r:c.ra,':s4-4'441.4'.-:‘ 0.•t`' .,` ,,;(.4.:,- j ` , tr,ti ! ',• :'. 7 v.a, - i. a;. e4y^ y- « Az,,`* X r-Y; t, t 1 I f °", fps •fQST : 1 i t• t 1 r r , Z y, 4r I ' + ii 1 1 ti C a br a of 0 I l++t 1 i ,i ',' `•/ tY ifom t A 11 Y T, r, 1 I ' • r i 1 r may4 a ",^.- r , : " 1 tt 1. ( d •, f v 1 I,1 1 \ s ri 44 s- L 6 1 a 1`' •f 1{ 1 1 rg ` v.r.: e• - r' 1 1 'I SII e ;' 1 Ep{ r Sa r? - Ir._41A r It 1 1 Al t t JO •+ 4 .. in r', 1 ty` k •1 y • ,, e >w ati. I I y'I' ,,; 1t y. Ia , fff itl if iiii, i . 4 Nt: r R f , if el F, I 1.no ., 1 ; I i ' Al ; k'. t I ` t ' I t1 tit 4-e. lil. ' H Ii+1 1 r i ''• _. i. .,0 li it f 41 i it F 11 Xrt w il1 { j •11 I t 1 s ri•P'`>/ T+ 3 1 ' ' Y Vic{ti 1 t'fI op kii a• 1 i , ,.i ,,1 4. ` 1 is 4 t11 !ilia `\ ii r i l ;1 `h 11 1 VrVjVrs. _4J7 t a 4 r ,f, , +. _,2,-,•:„. ...•., . .• : .. ? rz ...,..p s •,,,..,‘ t..... I t r / -. ir"''' C -4- l 1 4. J. s1 h• ,[ eti iQ' I 11.'. c, r s .-r ' fiiist 42 2.,)° a 4• ....,4 3 4, r_ IL _ il ___%,„, __ x,. . t. .Vi r VA j '^ 1 ti . jCt , , 2:-..--------17-s..-- ,-_ T1_ x' 1 y ci C% i s* !1.4.- . '-• . .'" • c...' ,',1,.-••• '.,. r, .. 7.-- , ..... _A . , f i';-:.• ' ''' '..-... .. . • t,.:•--, . ._ _ __„..-- 401",, A,""8 i ill 8 -444., - . • ' 41p.-t.: -,,,k, • .4, , 4- 144 P7' 4. •-,‘ .',is.'7' - 7... ---r.---i f 11 • 14,,.."'.. ti , ..4 r . tit 1 ..11, 4 • :-• • .r .....k.11L'14• • W.-•''-.7-, 1. OY'i '' =. - I ."1 At 4,a f 4,',' ' . .'.-.-4'--',.r. 1.,I C14-'•-' i., ,•i ;.4 ,1 '' .-. • 44 -.. •_ • .. ..i.,cf, ,i ;.4. 4, - 1 4.•t...., 6 ., • .: ;,...„,._ :, ..,,,,,,,r,„:„..: . . ,. ........_ . .f,le, I,--r 0'46,,Si.; -',;-,.. ...„,,,,,./ii,;,‘ ..!,,,k. r` _ •-f • i f''.. •.rt;t‘ ,67'..,' - f_-_,,,. .•••;,. -, . .. ki.. ,. •i:r c.- \ ..w..44-A...t -,A. . .,,. •1 t:,- 0,... 4ti ,,,,,,,, .- .,• . ;••.- • •-,, ..: ...-z.-„,,,..,-......-:.;:*.- - , - - -•_ f•••• -...i :... t:-....-„,ti.1.„. e...1/4 A , N, F,- .., ',..:•,..-',...„.,. .Y.- /.- ',:.:,ZI", •:;;"-- ,. . ' .ti'ik•0 1,t ' 1 4. rii," - •-• s,,,s'--/ , '"••••4".'7';'.44-3'''.' 1-PV• i•••'.. • • ' /"..›,..*7- ' --•- :•• ,,,•:•.AA'', - ' T‘11 11111111111ritil..---. 1.,) 1, ',-.4-t' -1C-i---1t.itl., .'; •41.4.- -:7 :•f• . --...,- - •--'* , ' , .,,' .''.."p"- • "P 14.,T.L -1".1. 4 - -"Will:1k*, -; e- ' '' ' .i. -,_:::-..:.'-'--.'4-4••_, . -,-.7 •-t 1.8 ••'4 ?::r,, Jr',....".S'g, r •• ..•-• •• 1,.4. -4, -k..4 -- ...., - 4 , •-:1." ' '.-Pr. l'—', L. . -....,,'4-.- • -,1 pf P. .V'. t As; .. 7 -_,"-:' 4.-...'.•, S f'- • 70 4.Y.: -• , 1 I .1 ! . 47 P 1 1 ...,, • Itii4-:•t iI141 7"(r`i Nt-,tis' its, j4./.. . 1 -- - - i f ."-- t .„..,• ic- i 1 - i -- f ••-• lk- 4 T _ a Art. ,...4 -...„ 1 .: • -,., e - i -; .--, 4 - . 1,... • ,, '.,...`, ,, , ---•;,_ . . 4„.,. , N,,. ',rt... 1 ' p„,,, NN k ..,....,_. ...4, . , . , ..... ...... 1‹... - T ' ' -. -; i- / . -' --z-ri•-4.:4-,•;-t -1 J I Z • i': - 1.-. 8 . s.4. ".'•' ., :•;- --8[''.., '._ 4- =k i•,.. i" .•t ;- - ,7110.-....\,il - 4. , • mi. it. % 4 - c. f, r1... -,, 4 141 . 1 I, l..., N- 1. 1* .. 1? i 4' I .r- ,,, s_ i • 'q " 1t”, 1 i i4. ;. , 1 . ii' r I I eft. i.,,, -..,----'''.•: 1; i. , , • o k A.:•••,Y, 1'•. I&-A:' ' •'..-:, •Ilt.'- ' - . -V •. A tr. •.- i- •liwair-- 7. • 7 z q•• . • pe--.- 4,• -..•---..„-.e. A4:-. -... .‘'7 4 4 .. f I-' ',..,..., , A •to, 7' Jr" ,Iii,..,- it a- , .,:. .,,,,. : „.„,,- ,. ,.,,.,„ , ,..,.,,, i. , . . .,-,,',.,i • ....... $ ,,,,,-. ,,tiii.'r114• . ' ‘.:". :\ ‘. - si.-'",' 7,----" 7:1%;:'1,1.:1:4"-,:,A , • /t ti1,,,,,-. --- - A. ...;„-; .3: =0,-....- `: : - ?;.-.`" . 1'. • ' ' ' ' i. . - . • ..-,-- -::', . .--:.. 11.'i'''''' - i'.,3 - '% ..-.: ' -:.: - !', 4 - .... i , . , . I.y.,• -, ..-1,._. .1,• N--:-• - --; '.. —: -- . - - ,,,,.....,.-7" 4 ,t • . • ,.. ..., '--,„ - -S, • —41 t•--- _,_.• l'.; .0 ,•-•1-T.- • 1 •.,' 4e,.....• •• • : .• i 1,/ , At....i,:....,5 .4.,7 L,L, ., ,5n--_ -;•.."6, . ,..-.. .5 t " .":.., i -"-4 -.1.'i ,.. i • ".1'-;; ".*.?-•' ,%. t ' " ' pe-..\--t. • '". 1 -, ,t\ki" ' "....• - ,t ,',.. i ..,,,- ef,:",i • -.. , •, l,.1,1A' ,i,,,,,. i\ f ', d1 1 ' -,. , ../ , 7 • --';.• 7-- - 1::..'.r,...;.,: -: t • -f tr• „ie.,.• .. , „. 1 . ,•,•-.4. / t-.4.7-: . .-.._. *Is, .--.-.,,-..,. ", . ... -::41, , '- ,, , /14,, ,,,. ; I ... -•-...4 .„ ,...: • 1• , 4 '.., . -.....'' : 1.'‘.. 6/,:,...‹--,.... .-_---- ...-- • , - s,t x144,41 sI( •71::nx41At 7. Mil 1 4i t.1 is al I . .• .1 ' . i C up v) I Q) 0- 0 c fD 0 0 Ipll 111.7...\,,CU 4-0O 0- 4- 0 4- O i \. A. CL co t x 1111 _.,` 73 C 4-' V) 4,,llUMfi F e s 111 trii. f s rftkiiininat P i' 1' • s i i f 1_ a 1 - T • 1,11/ • shor.; IL, 1 i Ar F ii LI' • i- t 4:,, r t a- t .l D i E J Memorandum To: MacKenzie Walters, Associate Planner From: Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Engineer CC: Charles Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer George Bender, Assistant City Engineer Date: 6/4/2020 Re: Water Oriented Accessory Structure Variances at 3920 White Oak Lane – Planning Case 2020-08 The Engineering and Water Resources Department have reviewed the Variance submittal for 3920 White Oak Lane. These comments are divided into two categories: general comments and proposed conditions. General comments are informational points to guide the applicant in the proper planning of public works infrastructure for this project, to inform the applicant of possible extraordinary issues and/or to provide the basis for findings. Proposed conditions are requirements that Engineering and Water Resources recommends be formally imposed on the developer in the final order. Note that references to the “City Standards” herein refer to the City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. General Comments/Findings 1. Any and all utility and transportation plans submitted with this application have been reviewed only for the purpose of determining the feasibility of providing utility and transportation facilities for the project in accordance with City Standards. A recommendation of variance approval does not constitute final approval of details, including but not limited to alignments, materials and points of access, connection or discharge, that are depicted or suggested in the application. The applicant is required to submit detailed construction drawings and/or plat drawings for the project, as applicable. The City of Chanhassen Engineering and Public Works Department will review plans, in detail, when they are submitted and approve, reject or require modifications to the plans or drawings based upon conformance with City Standards, the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances and the professional engineering judgment of the City Engineer. 2. It is the opinion of the Engineering and Water Resources Department that the proposed variance can be be developed in accordance with the requirements of the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances (as it pertains to Engineering and Public Works requirements) and City Standards, provided it fully addresses the comments and conditions contained herein, and can be approved. 3. The applicant is proposing the installation of an 8’ x 10’ storage shed on Outlot A of the associated property. The installation of the shed, as proposed, does not encroach into the 10 foot drainage and utility easement abutting the northern property line of Outlot A. There are no public utilities located within the Outlot. See proposed condition 1. 4. The request to place the second water oriented accessory structure (WOAS) in the Outlot meets the intent of the Shoreland Management Ordinance and the platting of the subdivision. 5. The addition of this second WOAS would bring the total square footage of WOAS on the Outlot to approximately 340 square feet. A maximum of 250 square feet is allowed for WOAS. See Proposed Conditions 2. Proposed Conditions 1. The installation of the shed shall not encroach into any recorded drainage and utility easement associated with the Outlot. 2. All WAOS on the Outlot will need to be no more than a combined 250 square feet. MEMORANDUM TO: MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner FROM: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist DATE: June 16, 2020 SUBJ: 3920 White Oak Ln., Variance to construct a building The beachlot has had many trees and shrubs removed over the years and replaced with turf grass even though only limited clearing of vegetation in a shoreland area is allowed. Staff recommends that no vegetation be allowed to be cleared for the grading or construction of the building. The property owners should, over time, replace vegetation on the beachlot to help protect water quality and reduce run off. Recommendation: 1. No trees, shrubs or native vegetation shall be allowed to be cleared for the grading or construction of the building.