Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Wetland Delineation Report_Updated
Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Comerica Bank by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2017-110) September 27, 2017 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY ......................................................................... 1 2. OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 2 3. METHODS ............................................................................................................................. 2 4. RESULTS ............................................................................................................................... 3 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters and NHD Information .......................................... 3 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations........................................................................ 4 4.3 Other Areas ....................................................................................................................... 6 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination ................................... 6 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION ............................................................................. 7 TABLES Table 1. Wetlands delineated on the Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard site ........................... 1 Table 2. Soil types mapped on the Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard site .............................. 3 Table 3. Delineated Wetlands Description Chanhassen – Galpin Boulevard site ................. 5 FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Public Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset APPENDICES A. Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota B. Wetland Delineation Data Forms C. Supporting Information D. Wetland Boundary Survey E. Historical Aerial Images 1 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The 188.5-acre Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard site was inspected on July 13, 2017 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map showed eleven wetlands within the property boundaries. • The soil survey showed hydric and partially hydric soil types on the property included Essexville, Hamel, Klossner, Klossner-Muskego, and Muskego-Houghton soils. • The DNR Public Waters Inventory showed Lake Lucy (DNR Public Water 10-7P), Lake Ann (DNR Public Water 10-12P), and a DNR Protected Wetland (10-211W) within the property boundaries. • The National Hydrography Dataset showed three waterbodies and one watercourse located within the property boundaries. • Fourteen wetlands delineated within the site boundary are summarized below. Table 1. Wetlands delineated on the Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard site Wetland ID Wetland Type Dominant Vegetation Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers and Reed 1 2/3/4/7 PFO1B/EM1B/C/F Partially forested,/fr. wet mead./sedge mead./shallow mar./deep marsh/hardw. sw. Reed canary grass, cattail, green ash, sedge, jewelweed 2 3 PEM1C Shallow marsh Reed canary grass, cattail 3 1 PEM1A Seasonally flooded basin Duckweed 4 1 PEM1A Seasonally flooded basin Green ash, sedge, rice cut grass 5 1 PFO1A Forested, seas. flood. basin Rice cut grass, sedge 6 1 PEM1A Fresh wet meadow Reed canary grass, nutsedge 7 1 PFO1A Forested, seas. flood. basin Green ash, jewelweed 8 1 PFO1A Forested, seas. flood. basin Green ash, boxelder 9 1 PFO1A Forested, seas. flood. basin Green ash, boxelder 10 1 PEM1A Seasonally flooded basin Duckweed 11 2/3 PEM1B/C Fresh wet mead./Shallow marsh Cattail, bulrush, reed canary grass 12 1/2 PFO1A/EM1B Forested seas. flood basin/ fresh wet meadow Green ash, reed canary grass 13 1 PFO1A Forested, seas. flood. basin Green ash, reed canary grass 14 1 PFO1A Forested, seas. flood. basin Reed canary grass, green ash Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report 2 2. OVERVIEW The 188.5-acre Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard site was inspected on July 13, 2017 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in Sections 3, 10, & 11, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. The site was situated east of Galpin Boulevard, south of Topaz Drive and Ruby Lane, and south of Majestic Way (Figure 1). The property corresponded to Carver County PIDs 250100100, 250100200, 256900010, 256900020, and 256900030. The northern and eastern portions of the site consisted primarily of woodland. The northern portion of the property was dominated by white oak, boxelder, and American elm trees with a dense understory of common buckthorn and honeysuckle shrubs. The eastern woodland was dominated by sugar maple and basswood trees with an understory of ironwood trees and common buckthorn shrubs. A large fresh wet meadow/shallow marsh/hardwood swamp wetland was located in the center of the property. The western third consisted of mowed hayfield dominated by alfalfa and Kentucky bluegrass with scattered white oak and bur oak trees. Site topography was highest in the northern and western portions and sloped steeply downhill toward Wetland 1. The property was bordered on the west by Galpin Boulevard, on the south by wetland, woodland, and single-family homes, on the east by Lake Ann and Lake Lucy, and on the north by woodland and single-family homes. Fourteen wetlands were delineated within the site boundaries. The delineated wetland boundaries and existing conditions are shown on Figure 2. Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and (2) delineation concurrence and an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) for Wetlands 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 13 under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. 3. METHODS Wetlands were identified using the Routine Determination method described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that were located by land surveyors from Carlson-McCain Inc. Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report 3 Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, a 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches (unless otherwise noted) using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Version 7, 2010). Mapped soils are separated into five classes based on the composition of hydric components and the Hydric Rating by Map Unit color classes utilized on Web Soil Survey. The five classes include Hydric (100 percent hydric components), Predominantly Hydric (66 to 99 percent hydric components), Partially Hydric (33 to 65 percent hydric components), Predominantly Non-Hydric (1 to 32 percent hydric components), and Non-Hydric (less than one percent hydric components). Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2016 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2016. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH). 4. RESULTS 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) map showed eleven wetlands within the property boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2015) showed hydric and partially hydric soil types on the property included Essexville, Hamel, Klossner, Klossner-Muskego, and Muskego-Houghton soils. Soil types mapped on the property are listed in Table 2 and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. The Hydric Soil Lists – All Components table is included in Appendix C. Table 2. Soil types mapped on the Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard site Symbol Soil Name Acres % of Area % Hydric Hydric Category EK Essexville sandy loam 34.45 18.3 100 Hydric HM Hamel loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 6.46 3.4 90 Predominantly Hydric KB Kilkenny-Lester loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes 23.74 12.6 0 Non-Hydric KB2 Kilkenny-Lester loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded 1.44 0.8 0 Non-Hydric Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report 4 Table 2. Soil types mapped on the Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard site Symbol Soil Name Acres % of Area % Hydric Hydric Category KC Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes 30.97 16.4 0 Non-Hydric KC2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded 12.46 6.6 0 Non-Hydric KD Lester-Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes 5.90 3.1 0 Non-Hydric KD2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded 0.62 0.3 0 Non-Hydric KE2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded 10.76 5.7 0 Non-Hydric KF Lester-Kilkenny loams, 25 to 40 percent slopes 9.63 5.1 0 Non-Hydric MK Muskego and Houghton soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes 38.84 20.6 100 Hydric ND3 Lester-Kilkenny clay loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded 1.49 0.8 0 Non-Hydric NE3 Lester-Kilkenny clay loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded 3.36 1.8 0 Non-Hydric PM Klossner muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes 3.96 2.1 100 Hydric TB Terril loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 4.60 2.4 8 Predominantly Non-Hydric The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2015) showed Lake Lucy (DNR Public Water 10-7P), Lake Ann (DNR Public Water 10-12P), and a DNR Public Wetland (10-211W) within/adjacent to the property boundaries (Figure 5). The National Hydrography Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) showed three waterbodies and one watercourse located within the property boundaries (Figure 6). 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated during field observations on July 13, 2017. Fourteen wetlands were identified and delineated on the property (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix B. The following descriptions of the wetlands and adjacent uplands reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. Herbaceous vegetation was actively growing at the time of the wetland delineation. Precipitation conditions were drier than the normal range based on available 30-day rolling total precipitation and wetter than normal based on the three-month antecedent precipitation data (Appendix C) and field observations. A wetland boundary survey prepared by Carlson-McCain Inc. is included as Appendix D. All delineated wetlands and their adjacent upland descriptions are included on Table 3 on the following page. Table 3. Delineated Wetland Descriptions Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard site Wetland ID Wetland Area (acres)Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers and Reed Dominant Vegetation Adjacent Upland Vegetation Observed Drainage Features Observed Hydrology Indicat.Mapped NWI Wetland Mapped Soil Series 1 41.90 2/3/4/7 PFO1B/ EM1B/C/F Partially forested, fresh wet meadow/ sedge meadow/ shallow marsh/ deep marsh/ hardwood swamp Reed canary grass, cattail, green ash, sedge, jewelweed White oak, common buckthorn, sugar maple, basswood, Kentucky bluegrass, alfalfa Wetland 1 extends outside of proprty to the north and south. Center of wetland inundated with 1-2' of standing water with a saturated fringe. PEM1A/C /FO1A/ABG Muskego-Houghton, Essexville 2 0.18 1 PEM1C Shallow marsh Reed canary grass, cattail Paper birch, boxelder, common buckthorn Wetland 2 drains through a ditch to Wetland 1. Center of wetland inundated with 6-12" of surface water with a saturated fringe.PEM1A Muskego-Houghton 3 0.16 1 PEM1A Seasonally flooded basin Duckweed White oak, Basswood, Pennsylvania sedge, common buckthorn Isolated depression Center of wetland inundated with 6-12" of surface water.PUBF Lester-Kilkenny 4 0.20 1 PEM1A Seasonally flooded basin Green ash, sedge, rice cut grass White oak, Basswood, Pennsylvania sedge, common buckthorn Wetland 4 appeared to surface flow to Wetland 5. Center of wetland inundated with 6-12" of surface water.N/A Lester-Kilkenny 5 0.05 1 PFO1A Forested, seasonally flooded basin Rice cut grass, sedge White oak, Basswood, Pennsylvania sedge, common buckthorn Wetland 5 appeared to surface flow to Wetland 1.Saturated at surface.N/A Lester-Kilkenny yellow-nut-sedge Kentucky bluegrass, birds-foot-trefoil, quackgrass Isolated depression Geomorphic position, FAC-neutral test N/A Hamel 7 0.62 1 PFO1A Forested, seasonally flooded basin Green ash, jewelweed Sugar maple, basswood, ironwood, common buckthorn Isolated depression Saturated at surface.PUBG Lester-Kilkenny 8 0.17 1 PFO1A Forested, seasonally flooded basin Green ash, boxelder Sugar maple, basswood, ironwood, common buckthorn Isolated depression Saturated at surface.PEM1A Lester-Kilkenny 9 0.38 1 PFO1A Forested, seasonally flooded basin Green ash, boxelder Sugar maple, basswood, ironwood, common buckthorn Isolated depression Saturated at surface.PUBG Lester-Kilkenny 10 0.13 1 PEM1A Seasonally flooded basin Duckweed Sugar maple, basswood, ironwood, common buckthorn Isolated depression Center of wetland inundated with 6-12" of surface water.N/A Lester-Kilkenny 11 2.79 2/3 PEM1B/C Fresh wet meadow/shallow marsh Cattail, bulrush, reed canary grass Kentucky bluegrass, disteria, Canada thistle, red clover Wetland 11 recieved surface flow from Wetland 12. No apparent outlets were observed. Center of wetland inundated with 6-12" of surface water with a saturated fringe.PEM1A Klossner, Terril, Lester-Kilkenny basin/fresh wet meadow Green ash, reed canary grass White oak, sugar maple, basswood, common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn Wetland 12 surface flowed toward Wetland 11. Center of wetland inundated with 6-12" of surface water.PEM1C Klossner, Lester-Kilkenny 13 0.03 1 PFO1A Forested, seasonally flooded basin Green ash, reed canary grass White oak, sugar maple, basswood, common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn Isolated depression Saturated at surface.N/A Lester-Kilkenny 14 0.23 1 PFO1A Forested, seasonally flooded basin Reed canary grass, green ash White oak, sugar maple, basswood, common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn Wetland 14 drains through a ravine into Wetland 1.Saturated at surface.N/A Lester-Kilkenny Reed canary grass, 6 0.06 1 PEM1A Fresh wet meadow Forested, seasonally flooded 12 0.64 1/2 PFO1A/ EM1B Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report 6 4.3 Other Areas Other areas were investigated because they were: (1) observed to support a hydrophytic plant community, (2) had visible wetland hydrology indicators, (3) were shown as wetland on the NWI map, or (4) were depressional and mapped as hydric soil. Field investigation led to the conclusion that these areas were not wetland. An ornamental feature was located in the eastern portion of the property (Figure 2) mapped as non-hydric soil (Lester-Kilkenny) on the soil survey. The feature appeared to be an abandoned ornamental pond dominated by reed canary grass and Canada thistle. A review of available aerial photography (Appendix E) showed the ornamental pond was excavated sometime between 1971 and 1991 in apparent upland meadow. Since the ornamental feature was excavated in an area mapped as non-hydric soil, KES determined the area to be non-wetland. Area A was an excavated channel located between Lake Ann and Lake Lucy on the far eastern portion of the site (Figure 2). This channel was approximately 8 to10 feet wide and approximately 1 foot deep with a sandy substratum bottom. No vegetation was observed within the channel and the banks were vegetated by woodland dominated by sugar maple and basswood trees and buckthorn shrubs. Due to a lack of hydrophytic vegetation, KES determined this area to be non-wetland. A drainageway was located in the northwestern portion of the property (Figure 2), which extended from Wetland 2 and flowed downhill toward Wetland 1. The drainageway was an eroded channel approximately 2 to 3 feet wide and approximately 6 inches deep with no vegetation observed within the channel. Due to a lack of a hydrophytic plant community, KES determined the drainageway to be non-wetland. No other areas with hydrophytic vegetation or wetland hydrology were observed on the site. No other areas were shown as hydric soil on the soil survey or as wetland on the NWI map. 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and (2) delineation concurrence and an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report 7 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. This wetland delineation and report were prepared in compliance with the regulatory standards in place at the time the work was performed. Site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation completed by: Ben Carlson, Wetland Specialist MN Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1125 Andrew Krinke, Ecologist/GIS Specialist MN Certified Wetland Delineator In-Training No. 5197 Adam Cameron, Wetland Ecologist/GIS Specialist MN Certified Wetland Delineator In-Training No. 5221 Report prepared by: Andrew Krinke, Ecologist/GIS Specialist MN Certified Wetland Delineator In-Training No. 5197 Report reviewed by: ____________________________________ Date: September 27, 2017 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Protected Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location Galpin Property (KES 2017-110)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 2,000 Feet Source: ESRI Streets Basemap Site Location Figure 2 - Existing Conditions Galpin Property (KES 2017-110)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 600 Feet Source: Minnesota DNR (2013) Drainageway Ravine Transect Ornamental Feature Lake Edge Wetland Boundary Assessment Area Wetland 141.90ac Wetland 20.18ac Wetland 60.06ac Wetland 50.05ac Wetland 40.20ac Wetland 30.16ac Wetland 130.03ac Wetland 120.60ac Wetland 112.79ac Wetland 100.13ac Wetland 90.38ac Wetland 70.62ac Wetland 80.17ac Wetland 140.23ac T-1 T-1 T-4 T-3 T-2 Area A Wetland 12A0.04ac Figure 3 - National Wetlands Inventory Galpin Property (KES 2017-110)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 600 Feet L1UBH L2ABH L2UBH PABG PABGx PEM1A PEM1C PEM1F PFO1A PUBF PUBG PUBGxSource: Minnesota DNR (2013), USFWS W W EX MK KC KE2 KB KB KE2 MK MP KC KC KE2 KC2 KB KFMK KF KC2 PM KD HM KB KD KC2 KF TB KB KC2 KC2 NE3 KB KD KC2 KD KB NE3 KB KCKC HM KC2 KC KC2 KF KBND3 HM KC KB GL PM KE2 NE3 TB KC KF HM KD HM KE2TC KD2 KB2 HM KB2 KD2 HM HM KF HM KC2 KC KC2 KE2 KD2 GL ND3 KF KB KC2 TC KC2KC2 PM GL Figure 4 - Soil Survey Galpin Property (KES 2017-110)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 600 Feet Hydric/Predominantly Hydric Partially Hydric Predominantly Non-Hydric/Non-Hydric Source: USDA, NRCS For soil series information see narrative. Ann (10-12 P) Lucy (10-7 P) Unnamed (10-211 W) Harrison (10-8 W) Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Inventory Galpin Property (KES 2017-110)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 600 Feet Public Waters Public Watercourse Source: Minnesota DNR Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset Galpin Property (KES 2017-110)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 600 Feet NHD Flowline ArtificialPath StreamRiver NHD Waterbody LakePond Source: USGS Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX A Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: Chanhassen – Galpin Boulevard PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent’s contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Gerard Snover – Comerica Bank Mailing Address: 230 Park Avenue Suite 634, New York, New York 10169 Phone: E-mail Address: GDSNOVER@comerica.com Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Andrew Krinke – Kjolhaug Environmental Services Mailing Address: 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130, Orono, MN 55331 Phone: (612)-704-6743 E-mail Address: Andrew@kjolhaugenv.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Carver City/Township: Chanhassen Parcel ID and/or Address: Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): 250100100, 250100200, 256900010, 256900020, and 256900030 Lat/Long (decimal degrees): Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 188.5 acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. 212-590-9992 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: Chanhassen – Galpin Boulevard PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact 1 Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Resource ID (as noted on overhead view) Aquatic Resource Type (wetland, lake, tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)1 Size of Impact2 Overall Size of Aquatic Resource 3 Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area4 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Area5 1If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the “T”. For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered “T (220)”. 2Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter “N/A”. 4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: * Date: * I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term “impact” as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. 9/26/2017 Comerica Bank & Trust, N.A. as Personal Represenative of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson uure below, I attest thhthhhhhhhhhthhhhhhhhatataaatataatatatatataaaattaatttatatatt the informatio ttto undertake ttttttttttttttthehehehehehehehehehehehhh wwwwwwwwwworoooooooooooooookkkkkk described here * bbby authorize tottttt act on my beha suppleme Com Rep Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: Chanhassen – Galpin Boulevard Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): Wetland Type Confirmation Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX B Wetland Delineation Data Forms Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Muskego and Houghton soils NWI Classification: 2 to 4 Lat:Long:Datum: N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 0 0 0 4.00 110 440 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Bromus inermis 100 Y FACU (Plot size:5 Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU Asclepias syriaca 5 N N0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 110 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACU 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 1 0 110 440 0.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP1-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1A , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP1-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-10 10YR 2/1 100 SL 10-18 10YR 3/2 100 L Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP1-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1A , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACW 120 240 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 5 5 0 0 100.00% Y0 Persicaria pensylvanica 20 Y Urtica dioica 60 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Phalaris arundinacea 20 Y FACW 10 2.00 120 240 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Frangula alnus 10 Y FACW Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 1If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Muskego and Houghton soils NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):10 Surface Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 12-16 10GY 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M SiL 0-12 N 2.5/0 100 muck Sampling Point:SP1-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP1-2UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 70 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACW 130 260 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 8 8 0 0 100.00% Y0 Pilea pumila 20 Y Alliaria petiolata 30 Y FAC (Plot size:5 Laportea canadensis 20 Y FACW 55 2.42 225 545 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 95 285 Rhamnus cathartica 35 Y FAC Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Y FACW Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW Acer negundo 30 Y FAC Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Ulmus americana 40 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Muskego and Houghton soils NWI Classification: 2 to 4 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X 20-26 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 15-20 10YR 2/1 100 CL 0-15 10YR 2/1 100 L Sampling Point:SP1-2U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Muskego and Houghton soils NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 1If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Acer negundo 5 Y FAC Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 5 15 0 2.05 105 215 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Phalaris arundinacea 60 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Impatiens capensis 20 Y FACW Pilea pumila 20 Y Y0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACW 100 200 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 4 4 0 0 100.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP1-2WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1C , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Sampling Point:SP1-2W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-7 N 2.5/0 100 muck 7-12 10GY 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M mucky CL Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):12 Surface *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP1-3UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: UPL 100 200 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 5 5 0 0 100.00% Y0 Leonurus cardiaca 10 N Alliaria petiolata 50 Y FAC (Plot size:5 Laportea canadensis 40 Y FACW 15 2.54 175 445 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 10 50 0 0 65 195 Rhamnus cathartica 15 Y FAC Ulmus americana 20 Y FACW Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Fraxinus pennsylvanica 40 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Muskego and Houghton soils NWI Classification: 2 to 4 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 10-18 10YR 3/2 100 L 0-10 10YR 2/1 100 SL Sampling Point:SP1-3U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Muskego and Houghton soils NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 1If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Acer negundo 10 Y FAC Ulmus americana 10 Y FACW 0 0 25 75 0 2.18 140 305 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Laportea canadensis 70 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Phalaris arundinacea 15 N FACW Galium boreale 10 N Athyrium filix-femina 5 N FAC Y0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FAC 115 230 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 4 4 0 0 100.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP1-3WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PFO1A , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region X Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Sampling Point:SP1-3W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-6 N 2.5/0 100 peat 6-16 10YR 3/1 100 peat Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):16 Surface *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes 16-26 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Flat Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Essexville sandy loam NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: N Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Acer saccharum 40 Y FACU Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Ulmus americana 20 Y FACW Acer saccharum 15 Y FACU 0 0 0 0 15 3.47 95 330 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Acer saccharum 15 Y FACU (Plot size:5 Arisaema triphyllum 5 Y FACW N0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 20 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: UPL 25 50 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 5 2 70 280 40.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP1-4UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP1-4U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-11 10YR 2/1 100 L 11-18 10YR 4/1 95 SL 10YR 6/1 5 D M Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes 18-26 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 4/6 15 C M SL US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP1-4WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACW 20 40 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 3 3 0 0 100.00% Y0 Phalaris arundinacea 20 Y Typha angustifolia 50 Y OBL (Plot size:5 Carex lacustris 30 Y OBL 0 1.20 100 120 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 80 80 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 1If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Essexville sandy loam NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region X Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):Surface Surface Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 0-12 N 2.5/0 100 muck Sampling Point:SP1-4W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: 2 to 4 Lat:Long:Datum: Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Betula papyrifera 20 Y FACU Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Acer negundo 10 Y FAC Malus spp.20 Y UPL Rhamnus cathartica 30 Y FAC 0 0 60 180 30 3.60 100 360 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 20 100 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC (Plot size:5 Y0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 20 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 5 3 20 80 60.00% Prevalence index was greater than 3 and sample area was dominated by FAC or drier vegetation. Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP2-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP2-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-24 10YR 2/1 100 L 24-28 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M SCL Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):26 22 *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP2-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 110 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACW 110 220 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 1 1 0 0 100.00% Y0 Impatiens capensis 10 N Persicaria pensylvanica 10 N FACW Phalaris arundinacea 70 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Pilea pumila 20 N FACW 0 2.00 110 220 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 2If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Kilkenny-Lester loam NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region X Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):12 Surface Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 12-18 10GY 4/1 100 S 0-12 N 2.5/0 100 muck Sampling Point:SP2-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 3 to 5 Lat:Long:Datum: N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Quercus alba 25 Y FACU Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC 0 0 30 90 10 4.26 115 490 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 60 300 Carex pensylvanica 60 Y UPL (Plot size:5 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC N0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 80 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 4 2 25 100 50.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP3-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP3-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-6 10YR 4/3 100 L 6-18 10YR 5/3 100 L Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP3-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PUBF , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 1 1 0 0 100.00% Y0 Lemna minor 100 Y OBL (Plot size:5 0 1.00 100 100 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 100 100 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 3If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region X Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) 2Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):Surface Surface Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 0-12 N 2.5/0 100 muck Sampling Point:SP3-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 2 to 4 Lat:Long:Datum: Y N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Tilia americana 40 Y FACU Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Rhamnus cathartica 50 Y FAC 0 0 90 270 50 3.31 130 430 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC (Plot size:5 Solanum dulcamara 20 Y FAC Y0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 40 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 4 3 40 160 75.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP4-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP4-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-8 10YR 3/2 100 L 8-16 10YR 4/3 100 L Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP4-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 25 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: OBL 40 80 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 6 6 0 0 100.00% Y0 Leersia oryzoides 5 Y Carex hystericina 10 Y OBL (Plot size:5 Laportea canadensis 10 Y FACW 20 1.92 65 125 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 15 15 10 30 Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Frangula alnus 10 Y FACW Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 4If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):16 Surface Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 12-18 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 L Sampling Point:SP4-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP5-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 65 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 3 2 25 100 66.67% Y0 Rhamnus cathartica 60 Y FAC (Plot size:5 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5 N FACU 20 3.24 105 340 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 80 240 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Tilia americana 20 Y FACU Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 2 to 4 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 8-16 10YR 4/3 100 L 0-8 10YR 3/2 100 L Sampling Point:SP5-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 5If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 50 50 0 0 0 1.29 70 90 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Leersia oryzoides 30 Y OBL (Plot size:5 Carex hystericina 20 Y OBL Y0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 50 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 40 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 3 3 0 0 100.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP5-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Sampling Point:SP5-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 L 12-18 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):14 Surface *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Flat Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Hamel loam NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: N Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 70 210 0 3.30 100 330 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Poa pratensis 70 Y FAC (Plot size:5 Elymus repens 20 Y FACU Lotus corniculatus 10 N N0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACU 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 2 1 30 120 50.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP6-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP6-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-6 10YR 2/1 100 SL 6-36 10YR 3/1 96 10YR 4/6 2 C M SL 36-42 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes 10YR 4/1 2 D M US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP6-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 70 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FAC 50 100 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 3 3 0 0 100.00% Y0 Poa pratensis 20 Y Cyperus esculentus 30 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Phalaris arundinacea 20 Y FACW 0 2.29 70 160 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 20 60 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 6If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Hamel loam NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X 30-36 10YR 2/1 100 SCL *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 36-42 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL 24-30 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL 0-24 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M L Sampling Point:SP6-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Flat Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Acer saccharum 40 Y FACU Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Tilia americana 40 Y FACU Acer saccharum 15 Y FACU 0 0 0 0 15 4.00 145 580 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Acer saccharum 50 Y FACU (Plot size:5 N0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 50 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 4 0 145 580 0.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP7-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP7-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-26 10YR 3/1 100 L Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 30 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP7-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PUBG , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 15 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACW 45 90 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 4 4 0 0 100.00% Y0 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Y Impatiens capensis 5 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Phalaris arundinacea 5 Y FACW 0 2.00 45 90 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 7If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Lester-Kilkenny loams NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):12 Surface Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 12-24 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 CL Sampling Point:SP7-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Flat Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: N Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Acer saccharum 55 Y FACU Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Tilia americana 35 Y FACU 0 0 0 0 0 3.89 95 370 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Arisaema triphyllum 5 Y FACW (Plot size:5 N0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 5 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 5 10 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 3 1 90 360 33.33% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 90 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP8/9-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Convex S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP8/9-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-5 10YR 2/1 100 L 5-30 10YR 3/1 100 L Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes 30-36 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Lester-Kilkenny loam NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 8If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Ulmus americana 20 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Acer negundo 15 Y FAC Frangula alnus 5 Y FACW 0 0 15 45 5 2.25 60 135 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Laportea canadensis 20 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Y0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 20 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 45 90 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 4 4 0 0 100.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 35 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP8-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1A , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13)X True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X X Sampling Point:SP8-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-8 N 2.5/0 100 CL 8-26 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP9-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PUBG , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 20 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FAC 35 70 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 6 6 0 0 100.00% Y0 Solanum dulcamara 5 Y Pilea pumila 5 Y FACW Frangula alnus 5 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Arisaema triphyllum 5 Y FACW 0 2.22 45 100 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 10 30 Acer negundo 5 Y FAC Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 9If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Lester-Kilkenny loam NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13)X True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X X 18-26 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M mucky CL *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 8-18 10YR 3/1 100 mucky CL 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 mucky CL Sampling Point:SP9-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Flat Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: N Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Acer saccharum 40 Y FACU Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Ostrya virginiana 15 N FACU Tilia americana 30 Y FACU Acer saccharum 5 Y FACU 0 0 10 30 5 3.87 155 600 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Acer saccharum 50 Y FACU (Plot size:5 Rhamnus cathartica 10 N FAC Arisaema triphyllum 5 N N0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 65 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACW 5 10 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 4 0 140 560 0.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 85 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP10-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP10-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-26 10YR 2/1 100 L 26-46 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M L Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes 46-48 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M SCL US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 30 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP10-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 60 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 2 2 0 0 100.00% Y0 Lemna minor 100 Y OBL (Plot size:5 0 1.23 130 160 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 100 100 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 10If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Kilkenny-Lester loam NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region X Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) 6Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):Surface Surface Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) X Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 muck Sampling Point:SP10-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP11-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Depression S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACU 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 4 2 55 220 50.00% N0 Trifolium pratense 20 Y Plantago major 20 Y FAC Cirsium arvense Digitaria ischaemum 30 Y FACU (Plot size:5 Poa pratensis 25 Y FAC 0 3.55 100 355 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 5 N FACU 0 0 45 135 Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Dominan t Species Indicator Staus N Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Klossner muck NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Flat Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 32-36 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M SCL *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):31 26 Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 16-32 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M L 0-16 10YR 2/1 100 L Sampling Point:SP11-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP11-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1A , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 100 200 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 1 1 0 0 100.00% Y0 Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW (Plot size:5 0 2.00 100 200 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 11If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Klossner muck NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X 47-48 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M CL *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):24 20 Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 17-47 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL 0-17 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M L Sampling Point:SP11-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Klosnner muck NWI Classification: 3 to 5 Lat:Long:Datum: N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Tilia americana 50 Y FACU Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Acer saccharum 20 Y FACU Rhamnus cathartica 70 Y FAC 0 0 75 225 70 3.48 145 505 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Poa pratensis 5 Y FAC (Plot size:5 N0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 5 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0 0 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 4 2 70 280 50.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 70 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP12-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP12-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-14 10YR 2/1 100 SL 14-26 10YR 3/2 90 SL Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes 10YR 4/3 10 US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Klossner muck NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 12If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Fraxinus pennsylvanica 100 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 0 0 0 2.00 140 280 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Phalaris arundinacea 30 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Urtica dioica 10 Y FACW Y0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 40 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 140 280 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 3 3 0 0 100.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP12-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1C , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region X Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Sampling Point:SP12-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 muck 12-18 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M mucky CL Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):4 0 *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 70 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP13-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 0 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 90 180 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 3 3 0 0 100.00% Y0 (Plot size:5 40 2.18 110 240 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 20 60 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC Frangula alnus 20 Y FACW Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Fraxinus pennsylvanica 70 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: 3 to 5 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X 38-48 2.5YR 4/2 90 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 10GY 4/1 5 D M 6-38 10YR 2/1 100 CL 0-6 10YR 2/1 100 L Sampling Point:SP13-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP13-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 20 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 105 210 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 3 3 0 0 100.00% Y0 Carex hystericina 15 Y OBL (Plot size:5 Urtica dioica 5 Y FACW 0 1.88 120 225 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 15 15 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 13If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Fraxinus pennsylvanica 100 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Kilkenny-Lester loam NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X 38-48 2.5YR 4/2 90 10YR 4/6 5 C M CL *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):30 28 Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 10GY 4/1 5 C M 6-38 10YR 2/1 100 CL 0-6 10YR 2/1 100 L Sampling Point:SP13-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 90 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP14-1UMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):None S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 140 280 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 4 4 0 0 100.00% Y0 Laportea canadensis 80 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Alliaria petiolata 20 Y FAC 0 2.26 190 430 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 50 150 Acer negundo 30 Y FAC Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. N Fraxinus pennsylvanica 60 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes N Kilkenny-Lester loams NWI Classification: 2 to 4 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X 46-48 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M SCL *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 26-46 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M L 0-26 10YR 2/1 100 L Sampling Point:SP14-1U Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):B. Carlson, A. Krinke, A. Cameron Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Comerica Bank State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Kilkenny-Lester loam NWI Classification: 0 to 2 Lat:Long:Datum: Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present?Yes Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 14If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are wetter than normal based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent) and drier than normal based on the 30-day rolling precipitation total. Y Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus 0 0 0 0 0 2.00 130 260 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 Urtica dioica 60 Y FACW (Plot size:5 Phalaris arundinacea 20 Y FACW Persicaria pensylvanica 20 Y Y0 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size:30 100 (Plot size:15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACW 130 260 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 4 4 0 0 100.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 30 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 7/13/2017 Sampling Point:SP14-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S10 T116N R23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Sampling Point:SP14-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc** 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 L 8-24 10YR 2/1 100 CL 10GY 4/1 5 C M Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5)Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):24 22 *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes 24-30 2.5YR 4/2 90 10YR 4/6 5 C M SCL US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX C Supporting Information Galpin Property, Chanhassen: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Monthly Totals: 2017 Target: T116N R23W S10, Lat: 44.87032 Lon: 93.57186 mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn oooooooo pre Jan 2017 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS .88 Feb 2017 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS .72 Mar 2017 10 116N 23W 15 BYRG .45 Apr 2017 10 116N 23W 15 BYRG 4.50 May 2017 10 116N 23W 15 BYRG 6.27 Jun 2017 10 116N 23W 15 BYRG 3.68 Jul 2017 10 116N 23W 15 NWS CHAN_NWS 4.20 Date Precip. May 1, 2017 .90 May 2, 2017 .15 May 3, 2017 0 May 4, 2017 0 May 5, 2017 0 May 6, 2017 0 May 7, 2017 0 May 8, 2017 0 May 9, 2017 .16 May 10, 2017 .03 May 11, 2017 0 May 12, 2017 0 May 13, 2017 0 May 14, 2017 0 May 15, 2017 0 May 16, 2017 .50 May 17, 2017 .79 May 18, 2017 1.94 May 19, 2017 .03 May 20, 2017 .02 May 21, 2017 1.59 May 22, 2017 .03 May 23, 2017 0 May 24, 2017 .02 May 25, 2017 0 May 26, 2017 .04 May 27, 2017 0 May 28, 2017 0 May 29, 2017 0 May 30, 2017 .07 May 31, 2017 0 1981-2010 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 30% 0.45 0.43 1.15 2.00 2.57 3.23 3.10 3.04 2.50 1.12 1.03 0.66 17.42 29.24 27.63 70% 1.11 0.88 2.05 2.86 4.13 4.95 4.18 5.35 4.46 3.35 1.88 1.42 21.61 33.03 34.10 mean 0.86 0.74 1.69 2.60 3.46 4.29 4.14 4.32 3.51 2.44 1.75 1.12 19.72 30.92 30.73 Date Precip. Jun 1, 2017 0 Jun 2, 2017 0 Jun 3, 2017 0 Jun 4, 2017 0 Jun 5, 2017 .04 Jun 6, 2017 0 Jun 7, 2017 0 Jun 8, 2017 0 Jun 9, 2017 0 Jun 10, 2017 0 Jun 11, 2017 0 Jun 12, 2017 1.29 Jun 13, 2017 .30 Jun 14, 2017 .23 Jun 15, 2017 0 Jun 16, 2017 0 Jun 17, 2017 0 Jun 18, 2017 .16 Jun 19, 2017 0 Jun 20, 2017 .19 Jun 21, 2017 0 Jun 22, 2017 0 Jun 23, 2017 .51 Jun 24, 2017 0 Jun 25, 2017 0 Jun 26, 2017 .04 Jun 27, 2017 0 Jun 28, 2017 .82 Jun 29, 2017 .10 Jun 30, 2017 0 Date Precip. Jul 1, 2017 0 Jul 2, 2017 0 Jul 3, 2017 0 Jul 4, 2017 0 Jul 5, 2017 T Jul 6, 2017 0 Jul 7, 2017 0 Jul 8, 2017 0 Jul 9, 2017 .03 Jul 10, 2017 0 Jul 11, 2017 T site visit Jul 12, 2017 .02 Jul 13, 2017 T site visit Jul 14, 2017 0 Jul 15, 2017 0 Jul 16, 2017 0 Jul 17, 2017 .67 Jul 18, 2017 .14 Jul 19, 2017 2.01 Jul 20, 2017 0 Jul 21, 2017 .01 Jul 22, 2017 0 Jul 23, 2017 0 Jul 24, 2017 T Jul 25, 2017 .42 Jul 26, 2017 .90 Jul 27, 2017 0 Jul 28, 2017 0 Jul 29, 2017 0 Jul 30, 2017 0 Jul 31, 2017 0 April/June/July Daily Records 9/6/2017 Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database http://climateapps.dnr.state.mn.us/gridded_data/precip/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm83=454827&passYutm83=4968704&passcounty=Carver&pa…1/1 Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home | current conditions | journal | past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | about us Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Carver township number: 116N township name: Lake Minnewashta range number: 23W nearest community: Carver Beach section number: 10 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar-based estimates. first prior month: June 2017 second prior month: May 2017 third prior month: April 2017 estimated precipitation total for this location:3.87R 4.84R 4.43 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than:3.23 2.57 2.00 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than:4.95 4.13 2.86 type of month: dry normal wet normal wet wet monthly score 3 * 2 = 6 2 * 3 = 6 1 * 3 = 3 multi-month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet)15 (Wet) Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5/12/17 5/27/17 6/11/17 6/26/17 7/11/17Daily and monthly total precipitation (inches) monthly precip daily precip 30d rolling total 30 -day rolling total normal precip range Site Visit Climate Conditions Galpin Property, Chanhassen Site Visit: 7/13/2017 Report—Hydric Soil List - All Components Hydric Soil List - All Components–MN019-Carver County, Minnesota Map symbol and map unit name Component/Local Phase Comp. pct. Landform Hydric status Hydric criteria met (code) EX: Essexville sandy loam Essexville 85 Beaches on lakes,moraines Yes 2 Belleville 10 Beaches Yes 2 Soils with a sandy substratum 5 Beaches Yes 2 HM: Hamel loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Hamel 75-95 Ground moraines Yes 2 Terril 5-15 Ground moraines No — Glencoe 0-10 Ground moraines Yes 2 KB: Kilkenny-Lester loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes Kilkenny 60 Moraines No — Lester 40 Moraines No — KB2: Lester-Kilkenny loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded Lester-Eroded 60 Moraines No — Kilkenny-Eroded 40 Moraines No — KC: Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes Lester 60 Moraines No — Kilkenny 40 Moraines No — KC2: Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded Lester-Eroded 60 Moraines No — Kilkenny-Eroded 40 Moraines No — KD: Lester-Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes Lester 60 Moraines No — Kilkenny 40 Moraines No — KD2: Lester-Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded Lester-Eroded 60 Moraines No — Kilkenny-Eroded 40 Moraines No — KE2: Lester-Kilkenny loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded Lester-Eroded 60 Moraines No — Kilkenny-Eroded 40 Moraines No — KF: Lester-Kilkenny loams, 25 to 40 percent slopes Lester 60 Moraines No — Kilkenny 40 Moraines No — MK: Muskego and Houghton soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes Muskego-Surface drained 20-60 Depressions Yes 1,3 Houghton-Ponded 20-60 Marshes Yes 1,3 Klossner-Drained 0-20 Depressions Yes 1 Glencoe 0-15 Depressions Yes 2 Hydric Soil List - All Components---Carver County, Minnesota Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/12/2017 Page 3 of 4 Hydric Soil List - All Components–MN019-Carver County, Minnesota Map symbol and map unit name Component/Local Phase Comp. pct. Landform Hydric status Hydric criteria met (code) MP: Klossner and Muskego soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes Klossner-Ponded 15-85 Marshes Yes 1,3 Muskego-Ponded 15-85 Depressions Yes 1,3 Canisteo 2-15 Ground moraines,rims on depressions Yes 2 Glencoe-Ponded 0-10 Depressions Yes 2,3 Harps 0-5 Rims on depressions Yes 2 ND3: Lester-Kilkenny clay loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded Lester-Severely eroded 60 Moraines No — Kilkenny-Severely eroded 40 Moraines No — NE3: Lester-Kilkenny clay loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Lester-Severely eroded 60 Moraines No — Kilkenny-Severely eroded 40 Moraines No — PM: Klossner muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes Klossner-Drained 85-95 Depressions Yes 1 Canisteo 0-10 Ground moraines,rims on depressions Yes 2 Okoboji 0-10 Depressions Yes 2 TB: Terril loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Terril 70-95 Ground moraines No — Delft 5-10 Swales on ground moraines Yes 2 Storden-Moderately eroded 0-10 Ground moraines No — Clarion 0-10 Ground moraines No — W: Water Water 100 ——— Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Carver County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 13, Sep 19, 2016 Hydric Soil List - All Components---Carver County, Minnesota Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/12/2017 Page 4 of 4 Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX D Wetland Boundary Survey LAKE LUCYLAKE ANNPARCEL 2EXCEPTIONPARCEL 1PARCEL 365431of6BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYComerica Bank 230 Park Avenue Suite 634 New York, New York, 10169REVISIONS1.2.3.4.5.6.DRAWN BY:FILE NO:JAB1478PRN ESTATE Chanhassen, Minnesota 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100, Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: 763-489-7900 Fax: 763-489-7959 ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING f:\jobs\6901 - 6920\6903 - prn estate - chanhassen\cad c3d\survey\6903-bndy.dwgSave Date:08/29/17 ISSUE DATE:08/28/2017Thomas R. Balluff08/28/2017License #:I hereby certify that this survey, plan orreport was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulylicensed land surveyor under the laws ofthe State of MinnesotaD R A F TTRACT A, B, AND C,REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 89,AND PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER~ for ~COMERICA BANKName:Signature:Date:40361OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23,CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTABOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY~ of ~LEGENDVICINITY MAPP R E L I M I N A R Y R E V I E W C O P Y 10113LAKE LUCYLAKE ANNPARCEL 2EXCEPTIONPARCEL 1PARCEL 32of6 TOPOGRAPHYComerica Bank 230 Park Avenue Suite 634 New York, New York, 10169REVISIONS1.2.3.4.5.6.DRAWN BY:FILE NO:JAB1478PRN ESTATE Chanhassen, Minnesota 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100, Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: 763-489-7900 Fax: 763-489-7959 ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING f:\jobs\6901 - 6920\6903 - prn estate - chanhassen\cad c3d\survey\6903-bndy.dwgSave Date:08/29/17 ISSUE DATE:08/28/2017VICINITY MAPLEGENDP R E L I M I N A R Y R E V I E W C O P Y PARCEL 2PARCEL 3EXCEPTION3of6DETAIL AComerica Bank 230 Park Avenue Suite 634 New York, New York, 10169REVISIONS3.4.5.6.DRAWN BY:FILE NO:JAB1478PRN ESTATE Chanhassen, Minnesota 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100, Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: 763-489-7900 Fax: 763-489-7959 ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING f:\jobs\6901 - 6920\6903 - prn estate - chanhassen\cad c3d\survey\6903-bndy-detail.dwgSave Date:08/29/17 ISSUE DATE:08/28/2017DETAIL AP R E L I M I N A R Y R E V I E W C O P Y E X C E P T I O NPARCEL 1PARCEL 3EXCEPTION4of6DETAIL BComerica Bank 230 Park Avenue Suite 634 New York, New York, 10169REVISIONS3.4.5.6.DRAWN BY:FILE NO:JAB1478PRN ESTATE Chanhassen, Minnesota 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100, Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: 763-489-7900 Fax: 763-489-7959 ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING f:\jobs\6901 - 6920\6903 - prn estate - chanhassen\cad c3d\survey\6903-bndy-detail.dwgSave Date:08/29/17 ISSUE DATE:08/28/2017DETAIL BP R E L I M I N A R Y R E V I E W C O P Y E X C E P T I O NPARCEL 15of6DETAIL CComerica Bank 230 Park Avenue Suite 634 New York, New York, 10169REVISIONS3.4.5.6.DRAWN BY:FILE NO:JAB1478PRN ESTATE Chanhassen, Minnesota 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100, Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: 763-489-7900 Fax: 763-489-7959 ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING f:\jobs\6901 - 6920\6903 - prn estate - chanhassen\cad c3d\survey\6903-bndy-detail.dwgSave Date:08/29/17 ISSUE DATE:08/28/2017DETAIL CP R E L I M I N A R Y R E V I E W C O P Y PARCEL 16of6DETAIL DComerica Bank 230 Park Avenue Suite 634 New York, New York, 10169REVISIONS3.4.5.6.DRAWN BY:FILE NO:JAB1478PRN ESTATE Chanhassen, Minnesota 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100, Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: 763-489-7900 Fax: 763-489-7959 ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING f:\jobs\6901 - 6920\6903 - prn estate - chanhassen\cad c3d\survey\6903-bndy-detail.dwgSave Date:08/29/17 ISSUE DATE:08/28/2017DETAIL DP R E L I M I N A R Y R E V I E W C O P Y Chanhassen - Galpin Boulevard Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX E Historical Aerial Photographs Historical Aerial Photograph - 1951 Photograph Galpin Property (KES 2017-110)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 600 Feet Assessment Area Project Boundary Historical Aerial Photograph - 1967 Photograph Galpin Property (KES 2017-110)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 600 Feet Assessment Area Project Boundary Historical Aerial Photograph - 1971 Photograph Galpin Property (KES 2017-110)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 600 Feet Assessment Area Project Boundary Historical Aerial Photograph - 1991 Photograph Galpin Property (KES 2017-110)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 600 Feet Assessment Area Project Boundary