Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CC Staff Report 12-14-20
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday,December 14,2020 Subject Consider a Request for an Amendment to Chanhassen Gateway PUD,Modification to PUD- Specific Design Features,and Amendment to Crossroads of Chanhassen Site Plan with Variances for Construction of a 5,100 SF Automotive Repair Shop Located at 8941 Crossroads Boulevard and Approval of Summary Ordinance Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No:D.4. Prepared By Sharmeen Al-Jaff,Senior Planner File No:Planning Case No.2020-21 PROPOSED MOTION The Chanhassen City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop, Planned Unit Development PUD)amendment for Chanhassen Gateway allowing Automotive Repair shops with standards,and Summary Ordinance for publication purposes,Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated, Received October 30,2020,including the attached Findings of Fact and Decision,subject to conditions." Approval requires a 4/5 Vote. SUMMARY The request consists of two applications to facilitate the construction of an automotive facility.The request includes a PUD amendment to existing standards,and Site Plan Approval for a 5,100 square-foot automotive facility. The site is located southeast of Crossroads Boulevard.Access to the site will be gained off of Crossroads Boulevard. The site is zoned Planned Unit Development-Mixed Use. BACKGROUND On December 1,2020,the Planning Commission reviewed this request.The site plan and ordinance amendment were approved unanimously.The Planning Commission minutes are attached to this report. DISCUSSION 1.Planned Unit Development Amendment: The first request is to amend the permitted uses section to allow automotive repair shops. 2.Site Plan: The second request is for a site plan to construct a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop.This use is not permitted under the PUD ordinance governing the site.If the requested amendment is not approved,the CITY COUNCIL STAFFREPORTMonday,December 14,2020SubjectConsideraRequest for an Amendment to Chanhassen Gateway PUD,Modification to PUD-Specific Design Features,and Amendment to Crossroads of Chanhassen Site PlanwithVariancesforConstructionofa5,100 SF Automotive Repair Shop Located at 8941CrossroadsBoulevardandApprovalofSummaryOrdinanceSectionCONSENTAGENDAItemNo:D.4.Prepared By Sharmeen Al-Jaff,Senior Planner File No:Planning Case No.2020-21PROPOSEDMOTION"The Chanhassen City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop,Planned Unit Development PUD)amendment for Chanhassen Gateway allowing Automotive Repair shopswithstandards,and Summary Ordinance for publication purposes,Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated,Received October 30,2020,including the attached Findings of Fact and Decision,subject to conditions."Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.SUMMARYTherequestconsists of two applications to facilitate the construction of an automotive facility.The request includesaPUDamendmenttoexistingstandards,and Site Plan Approval for a 5,100 square-foot automotive facility.The site is located southeast of Crossroads Boulevard.Access to the site will be gained off of Crossroads Boulevard.The site is zoned Planned Unit Development-Mixed Use.BACKGROUNDOnDecember1,2020,the Planning Commission reviewed this request.The site plan and ordinanceamendmentwereapprovedunanimously.The Planning Commission minutes are attached to this report.DISCUSSION1.Planned Unit Development Amendment:The first request is to amend the permitted uses section to allow automotive repair shops.2.Site Plan: The second request is for a site plan to construct a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop.This use is not permitted under the PUD ordinance governing the site.If the requested amendment is not approved,the request for the site plan cannot proceed. The total permitted site coverage is 70 percent.The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 43.8%. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high-quality materials which include brick,concrete block and EIFS.The design of the building is harmonious with the surrounding buildings.Approval of this site plan is contingent upon amending the PUD to allow the use of automotive repair shops.Parking and nine garage doors have been screened properly. Access to the site is provided via internal curb cuts off of Crossroads Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop, Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen Gateway allowing Automotive Repair shops with standards,and Summary Ordinance for publication purposes,Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated Received October 30,2020,including the attached Findings of Fact and Decision,subject to conditions. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact and Recommendation Ordinance Amendment Summary Ordinance Development Review Application Narrative Civil Plans Colored Site Plan Exhibit Exterior Elevation Colored Exterior Elevations Colored Renderings Memo from Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Memo from Carver County Public Works E-mail from Ms.Nancy Smith E-mail from Mr.Jeff Erpelding Letter from MnDOT Affidavit of Mailing December 1,2020 Planning Commission Minutes CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen City Council approve the site plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop, Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen Gateway allowing Automotive Repair shops with standards, and Summary Ordinance, Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated received October 30, 2020, including the attached Findings of Fact and Decision, subject to conditions.” Note: A motion for denial and appropriate Findings of Fact are also included at the end of the report.) PC DATE: December 1, 2020 CC DATE: December 14, 2021 REVIEW DEADLINE: Waived CASE #: 2020-21 BY: SJ, ET, EH, MU, DJ, JS SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Planned Unit Development amendment to allow auto repair facilities, amendments to design standards and a site plan for the construction of a 5,100 square foot automotive repair shop (Christian Brothers Automotive). LOCATION: SE of Crossroads Boulevard, 8941 Crossroads Boulevard (Lot 3, Block 1, Crossroads of Chanhassen). APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: Kimley-Horn & Assoc., Inc. Kraus-Anderson Inc. Christian Jones Chrystal Seelhammer 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100 525 S.8th Street St. Paul, MN 55114 Minneapolis, MN 55404-1030 Christian.Jones@kimley-horn.com chrystal.seelhammer@krausanderson.com 763-251-1016 612-255-2345 PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development, Mixed Use - PUD, Mixed Use 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Mixed Use ACREAGE: 0.79 acres DENSITY: N/A LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A PUD amendment must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The request consists of two applications to facilitate the construction of an automotive facility. The request includes a Planned Unit Development amendment to existing standards, and Site Plan Approval for a 5,100 square foot automotive facility. The site is located southeast of Crossroads Boulevard. Access to the site will be gained off of Crossroads Boulevard. The site is zoned Planned Unit Development- Mixed Use. The following is a summary of the requests: 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment: The first request is to amend the permitted uses section to allow automotive repair shops. 2. Site Plan: The second request is for a site plan to construct a 5,100 square foot automotive repair shop. This use is not permitted under the PUD ordinance governing the site. If the requested amendment is not approved, the request for the site plan cannot proceed. The total permitted site coverage is 70 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 43.8%. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high-quality materials which include brick, concrete block and EIFS. The design of the building is harmonious with the surrounding buildings. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon amending the planned unit development to allow the use of automotive repair shops. Parking and nine garage doors have been screened properly. Access to the site is provided via internal curb cuts off of Crossroads Boulevard. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 3 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial, and Office- Institutional Developments BACKGROUND The Land Use Plan designates areas around the TH 101/TH 212 interchange as Mixed Use. This category has been established to accommodate either commercial or high-density residential developments. The high-density category, which includes units with a maximum net density of 16.0 units per acre, accommodates apartments and higher density condominium units, but would also permit the development of townhome-type units. The commercial use is intended to support or complement high-density residential development. Commercial uses may include convenience grocery stores, daycare facilities, etc., or those uses that meet the daily needs of the residents. The Planned Unit Development governing this development needs to be amended and standards for the use developed in order for the site plan to be considered and approved. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 4 Concept Plan On January 4, 2005, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the Concept PUD for the site not to be confused with site plan approval). This plan was later approved by City Council on January 24, 2005. This final concept layout reflected a residential component within the areas located north and south of Lake Susan Drive with the highest density concentration facing Highway 101. The portion of the site located south of Highway 212 consisted of a mix of commercial and residential uses. In that instance, the residential part encompassed the western portion of the site while the commercial part occupied the remainder of the site, and faced Highways 101, 212, and Lyman Boulevard. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 5 Development Plan On June 27, 2005, the City Council approved rezoning the property from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development-Mixed Use and adopted the Planned Unit Development ordinance that regulated and set standards for the development of this site including permitted uses, landscaping, setbacks, signage, building materials, architectural standards, parking, etc. On February 27, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved a site plan for the construction of a three-story multi-family building containing 48 units, located northwest of the intersection of Highways 212/101 (north site). On January 24, 2008, the City requested the vacation of right-of-way along old Trunk Highway 101. A portion of the old highway occupies the westerly portion of the site. Development of the westerly portion of the site is contingent upon Minnesota Department of Transportation vacating the right-of-way. Amended Development Plan On March 10, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Planned Unit Development amendment clarifying setbacks, signage, and retail building size. Variance request to allow a 20-foot setback from Lyman Boulevard and a 20-foot setback from Highway 101. Preliminary plat for Planning Case 2008-01 for Crossroads of Chanhassen. Seven site plans consisting of a 5,300 square-foot convenience store with gas pumps and a 2,805 square-foot car wash (Building 4A), a multi-tenant building with an area of 11,000 square feet Building 4B), a two-story multi- tenant building with a first floor area of 13,800 square feet and second floor area of 15,000 square feet Building 4C), a one-story retail building with an area of 8,000 square feet (Building 4D), a 5,000 square-foot bank with drive-thru window (Building 4E), a 3,400 square-foot retail building (Building 4F), and a 10,000 square-foot Deli and Liquor Store (Building 4G). Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 6 On April 28, 2008, the City Council approved a final plat to subdivide 14.9 acres into three lots and one outlot - Crossroads of Chanhassen. On July 14, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council granted final plat approval for Crossroads of Chanhassen 2nd Addition creating two lots and one outlot for the area of the development that is being reviewed as part of the development proposal for the daycare. That plat was never recorded. As part of the submittal, staff directed the applicant to conduct a traffic study to evaluate the trip generation and circulation of the site along with the impact to the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Highway 101. A traffic study was performed by the applicant's engineer and reviewed by the City’s traffic consultant. Internally, the site has acceptable circulation. The only external site issue that was discovered is at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Crossroads Boulevard. Access spacing guidelines for Carver County do not allow a signal at this intersection. The possibility exists that the County could someday switch the access to Crossroads Boulevard to a right-in/right-out or block some of the turning movements. On March 26, 2012, the Chanhassen City Council approved a Planned Unit Development amendment to the existing standards; Preliminary and Final Plat to subdivide 6.15 acres into one lot and one outlot (Crossroads of Chanhassen 2nd Addition); and Site Plan Approval for construction of a daycare facility (Primrose of Chanhassen). This request combined Buildings 4F and 4G into a single building. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 7 SITE PLAN In order to provide a better understanding of the overall development, staff will first review the site plan component, which in turn leads to the PUD amendment. The building must comply with the Development Design Standards for Chanhassen Gateway. A PUD is required to be developed to a higher quality than other projects. Site coverage is averaged over the entire development. This is permitted under the PUD ordinance (Section 20-505(e)). The total permitted site coverage is 70 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 43.8%. The design of the 5,100 square foot building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high quality materials. They include brick, EIFS accents, rough-face block, awnings, and glass. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. Shared parking is centrally located on the site. It is buffered from views by buildings and landscaping. Staff had multiple conversations with the applicant and explained that the proposed building should be unique yet be harmonious and complement the buildings on the block. The proposed design of the building, as well as the materials used, fit and complement existing structures. All 9 garage doors and parking lot are properly screened. Complimentary design elements include parapet walls, pronounced entryway and awnings around the windows to soften the look of the building. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 8 Below is a colored rendering with the proposed materials which will make the building architecturally a fitting element of the overall development. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 9 Parking is proposed along the southeast half of the site. Buffering/screening of the parking and the garage doors will be discussed in the Landscaping section of this report. The applicant is proposing a bench at the entrance of the building. The structure is proposed to be located on Lot 3, Block 1, Crossroads of Chanhassen. One monument sign is proposed along the northwest corner of the site. The sign must meet all sign ordinance requirements. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 10 The ordinance regulating this development limits signage to two elevations per building. The size of the individual letters may not exceed 30 inches and the sign must comply with ordinance. Wall signs are proposed above the three middle garage doors and the rear of the building. All signage (Monument and Wall signs) shall use individual dimension letters, at least one-half inch deep. The logo may not exceed 30% of the total sign area. All buildings within the development of Crossroads of Chanhassen must maintain a 20- foot setback from the right-of-way. To continue the vernacular perspective, the applicant will maintain this setback. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 11 LIGHTING The applicant has submitted a lighting and photometric plan. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. All light fixtures must be consistent with the approved lighting plans. Staff is recommending that the lights be consistent with the approved fixtures in the development. Parking lot light fixtures may be 25 feet tall. All fixtures must be shielded. Monterey PARKING The ordinance requires auto repair shops to provide one parking space per 500 square feet of gross floor area. The entire Crossroads PUD shares parking spaces. The total required for the entire development is 247. The total proposed including the subject site is 278. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size, Portion and Placement Entries: The building has a pronounced entrance. Articulation: The building is part of a PUD. The buildings are intended to complement each other. The proposed building blends in and complements the architecture of the surrounding structures. It has unique features. All garage doors, parking and trash enclosure are properly screened. Signs: All signage must meet the sign criteria in the Planned Unit Development Design Standards for Chanhassen Gateway. W. 78th Street Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 12 Material and Detail High quality materials are being used on the building. Color The colors chosen for the building are earth tones. All materials are highly compatible with the existing buildings. Height and Roof Design The maximum building height in this PUD varies based on the use. The building meets the minimum set in the ordinance. The roofline is staggered, complements and is harmonious with the surrounding buildings. All rooftop equipment must be screened from views. Façade Transparency All facades viewed by the public contain more than 50 percent windows and/or doors except the southwest elevation. It is however properly screened. Loading Areas, Refuse Areas, Etc. The trash enclosure is located along the northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 1. The exterior material must be of the same exterior material as the building. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: 1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; 2) Consistency with this division; 3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; 4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 13 5) Creation of a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. 6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship with existing and future buildings. It does provide a compatible visual relationship. Approval of this building is contingent upon approval of the permitted uses of the Planned Unit Development ordinance to allow auto repair shops with standards. PUD AMENDMENT Allow an Auto Repair Shop: The language in the PUD currently does not permit any type of auto repair facilities. Staff has been working with the applicant and has had numerous discussions to prepare a plan that can meet the intent of the ordinance. The proposed location is the farthest from any residential development but staff still has concerns. This type of establishment can generate loud noises from power tools. In the summer, all garage doors remain open and the sound can carry to surrounding areas. Should the City approve this amendment, staff recommends adding the following language under permitted uses: Automotive Repair Shop on Lot 3, Block 1, with the following standards: o No unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on-premises except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas. o All repair, assembly, disassembly and maintenance of vehicles shall occur Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 14 with closed building except minor maintenance including, but not limited to, tire inflation, addition oil and wiper replacement. o No public address system. o No sales, storage or display of used automobiles or other vehicles such as motorcycles, snowmobiles, or all-terrain vehicles. o Disposal of vehicle fluids shall comply with PCA regulations. o Facilities for the collection of waste oil must be provided. o All service/garage doors shall be screened. o The building architecture shall complement surrounding buildings. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FINDINGS The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The site is guided Mixed Use (residential and neighborhood commercial). An auto repair shop can provide some convenience to neighboring properties. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The proposed use can generate noise. The design and architecture of the proposed building is compatible with the surrounding buildings (design standards, landscaping, architecture, etc.). c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: The proposed use will conform with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance such as design standards, signage, durable materials, uses, etc. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed use is intended to meet the daily needs of the area. It could potentially add convenience to the homeowners in the area. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 15 Finding: The site is located within the Municipal Urban Service Area. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. ACCESS Vehicular access to the site was originally provided from Crossroads Boulevard, a public street designed and built to Municipal State Aid Standards, during the construction of the original build-out of Crossroads of Chanhassen in 2008. The applicant is proposing to remove and restore the single access from Crossroads Boulevard in order to facilitate the proposed site plan layout. The removal and restoration of the original access will be required to meet the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates and will require a traffic control plan for review and approval prior to commencement of construction activities on-site. The applicant is proposing that the building be located at the western edge of the site, angled parallel to Crossroads Boulevard, with the customer facing side of the building internal to the development, with parking located directly east of the building. With the proposed layout, vehicular access will be had from two driveways connected by the internal, private roads of the Crossroads of Chanhassen to the north and south of the site (see image below). Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 16 The south driveway appears to propose no extraordinary issues, however, the north driveway entrance may negatively impact vehicular traffic on Crossroads Boulevard due to the spacing from the intersection with Crossroads Boulevard. The applicant was required to provide analysis that the proposed north driveway location is adequately spaced as to not create adverse impacts to Crossroads Boulevard and that the largest design vehicle accessing the site could turn into the north driveway access from Crossroads Boulevard (from both northbound and southbound movements). The provided analysis proved the north access feasible. Crossroads Boulevard intersections with Lyman Boulevard, a Carver County road, and Highway 101, which is governed by MnDOT. Plans were provided to both parties for review, and any applicable comments and conditions set by Carver County and MnDOT must be addressed. The applicant will be required to provide a brief traffic memo identifying changes to the PUD trip generation levels, traffic patterns, and impacts to the County and MnDOT intersections compared to the original PUD plan and traffic study as the site was not analyzed based on the intended use (previous trip generations were based on a drive-thru bank). EASEMENTS A 10-foot public drainage and utility easement along the western portion of the property was recorded with the original plat from 2008 for Crossroads of Chanhassen. As all utilities and Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 17 roads within the development are privately owned and maintained and covered under cross access agreements or private easements, no additional public easements are required from the proposed site plan. It is recommended that the applicant verify that all private easements and cross access agreements and their subsequent conditions are adhered to prior to construction. GRADING The first phase of the Crossroads of Chanhassen PUD completed mass grading of the site to achieve the relative elevations required for the site to be built-out. As such, the applicant is not proposing mass grading or major alterations to existing elevations of the site. However, as improvements are installed (underground and surface stormwater facilities, installation of utilities, paving and construction of parking areas, building pads, etc.) the site will expose soils and will be required to meet all erosion control measures as addressed under “Drainage and Erosion Control” of this report. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will exceed 5,000 square feet of land area disturbance, and as such, will require an erosion and sediment control plan submitted to the City. This shall be a stand along document that includes all required information listed in Chapter 19-145(a)(2) of the Chanhassen City Code. The applicant appears to have provided a sufficient erosion and sediment control plan, with minor amendments required. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. The proposed erosion control measures and BMPs appear adequate. However, if at any time during the construction of the site prior to final stabilization, these measures are found to be inadequate, additional BMPs will be required to meet the NPDES permit. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round. In the event that dewatering is needed, the city inspector shall be contacted prior to any dewatering activities. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The proposed development consists of a new automotive repair building, parking lot, associated utilities, and an underground and surface stormwater management BMPs. The 0.80-acre site is subject to the requirements of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD). The existing site consists of a vacant grass area with slopes of 1% to 4% encompassing much of the site. Prior to the proposed development, stormwater from the northeastern portion of the site flows to an existing inlet to the north of the site along an internal road for the overall development and is conveyed to the public storm sewer system. The western and northwestern portion of the site flows west to Crossroads Boulevard, a paved public street. Stormwater from the eastern and southern portion of the site flows to an existing area drain inlet on the south portion of the site and connects to the existing underground stormwater system. After development, site improvements will maintain existing drainage patterns. Stormwater runoff from a portion of the roof and a majority of the paved parking surface will discharge to a proposed underground stormwater infiltration system, noted on the plans as BMP #2. The Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 18 underground stormwater infiltration system is proposed to be perforated 36” pipe. Overflow from this BMP is routed to the existing underground storm sewer network. Stormwater runoff from the western portion of the roof will discharge to an infiltration basin, noted on the plans as BMP #1, on the west side of the proposed building. Overflow from this BMP is routed to an existing catch basin within Crossroads Boulevard. These BMPs appear to be adequate to treat stormwater runoff from the site. All stormwater from the site eventually runs to MnDOTs BraeBurn Pond, which was constructed with the off ramp of Highway 212. The applicant has evaluated that the impervious surface from this site will not inundate or negatively impact the downstream MnDOT facility based on new rainfall requirements (TP-40 vs NOAA Atlas 14). Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include abstraction of runoff and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). In addition, the project will need a permit from the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District prior to beginning construction activities. The RPBCWD provided a memorandum outlining the need for a permit and listed potential District rules that this project might meet. These rules are not considered exhaustive of all potential RPBCWD rules or provisions that may apply. The City encourages the applicant to work directly with RPBCWD to obtain the necessary approvals and permit. UTILITIES (SANITARY/WATER) The developer of the Crossroads of Chanhassen installed private sanitary sewer and water main throughout the development during the 2008 build-out of the PUD, and the proposed site has adequate sanitary and water services which will be had from these private utility extensions. The applicant is proposing to abandon an existing water service stub located near the southwest corner and southeast corner of the site. These service laterals were installed with the Crossroads of Chanhassen and the proposed abandonment appears to be due to the proposed site layout. Abandonment of the existing water services shall meet the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates (Specifications). The applicant is proposing to service the site with 1” PVC water service and a 6” PVC sanitary sewer service to be connected directly to the existing 8” stub. As required by Ordinance, the subject development is required to pay sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. These fees are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. The 2020 rates are $2,302.00/unit and 7,974.00/unit for sanitary sewer and water, respectively. LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION Minimum requirements for landscaping at the proposed development include 1,484 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, 3 landscape islands or peninsulas, and 6 trees for the Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 19 parking lot. The applicant’s proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 1,484 sq. ft. 1,484 sq. ft. Trees/parking lot 6 trees 6 trees Islands or peninsulas/parking lot 3 islands/peninsulas 3 islands/peninsulas The applicant meets minimum requirements for landscaping. The applicant has proposed screening for the garage doors or parking spaces. Adequate screening of this area is provided by evergreen shrubs along the eastern property line. Boulevard trees are required along Crossroads Boulevard every 30 feet. The applicant has proposed additional trees to meet the current spacing of existing trees. The applicant is protecting seven existing trees on site. These trees will be covered by the same standards as the proposed landscaping and will require replacement if damaged or dead upon inspection. Compliance Table Boundary Building/Parking Setbacks feet) Proposed Lyman Boulevard 20/20 NA Highway 101 North of Highway 212 50/50 NA Highway 101 South of Highway 212 20/20 NA Highway 212 50/50 NA Northerly Project Property Line 50/20 NA Westerly Project Property Line 50/20 NA Internal Project property lines 0/0 N 20’ E 70’ S 37’ W20’ Internal Right-of-Way (Crossroads Boulevard) 20/20 20/20 Hard Surface Coverage-Residential 50% NA Commercial and Office Hard Surface Coverage 70% 68.1%. Maximum Commercial (Retail) Building/Structure Height 1 story 1 Story Maximum Office Building/Structure Height 2 stories NA Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less NA Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 20 RECOMMENDATION Alternative 1: The City Council approves: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT The City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Chanhassen Gateway allowing Automotive Repair shops with the following standards: Automotive Repair Shop on Lot 3, Block 1, with the following standards: o No unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on-premises except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas. o All repair, assembly, disassembly and maintenance of vehicles shall occur within closed building except minor maintenance including, but not limited to, tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement. o No public address system. o No sales, storage or display of used automobiles or other vehicles such as motorcycles, snowmobiles, or all-terrain vehicles. o Disposal of vehicle fluids shall comply with PCA regulations. o Facilities for the collection of waste oil must be provided. o All service/garage doors shall be screened. o The building architecture shall complement surrounding buildings." SITE PLAN APPROVAL The City Council approve the site plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop, Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated received October 30, 2020, including the attached Findings of Fact and DecisionRecommendation, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resources Conditions: 1. All existing trees on site to be saved during construction shall be protected at all times by tree preservation fencing. Trees that are damaged or dead will be replaced. Engineering: 1. The applicant shall provide a traffic control plan for review and approval for the removal and restoration of the original access had from Crossroads Boulevard prior to commencement of construction activities on-site. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate sanitary sewer and water trunk hook-up fees at the time of building permit issuance. These fees are based on the number of SAC units Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 21 assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. The 2020 rates are $2,302.00/unit and $7,974.00/unit for sanitary sewer and water, respectively. 3. Prior to commencement of any construction activities, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the City which shall include, but is not limited to: the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed, etc. Water Resources: 1. The applicant has provided an erosion and sediment control plan as required by Chapter 19-145 of the City Code. The applicant shall update the plans to include the City’s Water Resources Coordinator as the contact on the plans (Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Coordinator, 952-227-1168). 2. The applicant shall evaluate and analyze that the impervious surface from this site will not inundate or negatively impact the downstream MnDOT facility based on new rainfall requirements (TP-40 vs NOAA Atlas 14). This analysis must be provided to the City under separate cover. Planning: 1. Approval of the site plan shall be contingent upon approval of the Planned Unit Development amendment to allow Automotive Repair shops. 2. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 3. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 4. The exterior material for the trash enclosure must be of the same exterior material as the building. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. 5. The monument sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area nor be higher than five feet. The sign shall be located 10 feet from the property line. A sign permit is required before construction of the sign. 6. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 7. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure as the trash. 8. Any prior approvals for a bank building on the subject site shall be null and void. 9. No unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on-premises except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 22 10. All repair, assembly, disassembly and maintenance of vehicles shall occur within closed building except minor maintenance including, but not limited to, tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement. 11. No public address system. 12. No sales, storage or display of used automobiles or other vehicles such as motorcycles, snowmobiles, or all-terrain vehicles. 13. Disposal of vehicle fluids shall comply with PCA regulations. 14. Facilities for the collection of waste oil must be provided. 15. All service/garage doors shall be screened. Alternative 2: The Planning Commission recommends denial of the Planned Unit Development Amendment to allow an Automotive Repair Shop and denial of a site plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop, Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated received October 30, 2020, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Ordinance Amendment 3. Summary Ordinance 4. Development Review Application and Narrative 5. Plan Sets 6. Letter from Riley Purgatory Watershed District dated September 12, 2020 7. Letter from Carver County Public Works dated September 25, 2020 8. E-mail from Ms. Nancy Smith dated September 28, 2020 9. E-mail from Mr. Jeff Erpelding dated September 17, 2020 10. Letter from MnDOT 11. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-21 8941 crossroads blvd (christian bros automotive)\revised documents 10-30-20\staff report december 14, cc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of Kimley-Hom & Assoc. Inc. for the following: I . Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards - Chanhassen Gateway. 2. Site Plan Review for the construction ofa 5,100 square foot Automotive Repair Shop (Building 4E). On December 1, 2020, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Kimley-Hom & Assoc. Inc. for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and Site Plan Review (Planning Case 2020-21). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Site Plan and Planned Unit Development Amendment preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT l. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development-Mixed Use, PUD-Mixed Use' 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Mixed Use. 3. The legal description of the property is Lot 3, Block l, Crossroads of Chanhassen. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. fu1!!4g: The site is guided mixed use (residential and neighborhood commercial). An Automotive Repair Shop will add a convenience to the area. The architectural design ofthe structure complements and blends well with surrounding buildings. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. gg!!4g: The proposed use is and will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area through the implementation ofthe design standards, landscaping, archilecture, etc. I c) The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. ESCjSg: The proposed use will conform to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance such as design standards, signage, durable materials, uses, etc. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. E!g@g: The proposed use is intended to meet the daily needs of the area. It could potentially add convenience to the homeowners in the area. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. fug!!4g: The site is located within the Municipal Urban Service Area. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f1 Traffrc generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. fu1!!4g: Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: I ) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; 2) Consistency with this division; 3) Preservation ofthe site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance ofthe neighboring developed or developing areas; 4) Creation ofa harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visua! relationship to the development; 5) Creation offunctional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense oforder for the buildings and use on the site and provision ofa desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. b. The amount and location ofopen space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression ofthe design concept and the compatibility ofthe same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. 6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring prope(ies through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation ofviews, light and air and those aspects ofdesign not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Ehdilgi The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship with existing and future buildings. It provides a compatible visual relationship. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon approval ofthe permitted uses ofthe Planned Unit Development ordinance to allow auto repair shops with standards. 6. The planning report #2020-21, dated December 1,2020, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development Amendment to the Chanhassen Gateway PUD and Site Plan for an automotive repair shop (Building 4E). ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this l't day of December 2020. GCOPLANNSSIONCHANHASS BY: Steven Weick, Chai glplanu02o plsnning cases\20-2 I 894 I crossroads blvd (christiai bros automotive)Vevised documents I G3o-2ovindings of fa.t approval doc J RECOMMENDATION 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by amending the Chanhassen Gateway Planned Unit Development Design Standards in its entirety as follows: CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a MIXED USE PUD including a Neighborhood Commercial, office and Residential. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. The Neighborhood Business District regulations shall apply to Lots 1- 3, Block 1 and Outlot A, Crossroads of Chanhassen , except as modified by this ordinance. The R-16 District regulations shall apply to Outlot C, except as modified by this ordinance. Exhibit A, as revised herein to reflect the changes to the commercial portion, reflects the site layout and buildings as referenced herein. 2 b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with meeting the daily needs of the neighborhood. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on these lots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Commercial and office uses shall be limited to the area located south of Highway 212. Residential uses shall be located north of Highway 212 and along the western portion of the southern half. Small to medium-sized restaurant-not to exceed 8,000 square feet per building. Fast food restaurants with a drive-thru is limited along the north end of Building 4B. It must be part of and attached to the multi-use building. The drive-thru lane shall be screened and the exterior wall of the drive-thru shall contain the same level of architectural detail as any other elevation visible by the public. Banks with a drive-in service window Office Day care Neighborhood scale commercial up to 8,000 square feet per tenant with the exception of building 4C. A tenant may occupy up to 10,000 square feet of said building and building 4G for a daycare to occupy 12,000 square feet. No individual service component of a retail building shall occupy more than 8,000 square feet of a building. Convenience store with or without gas pumps and car wash. Specialty retail (Book Store, Jewelry, Sporting Goods Sale/Rental, Retail Sales, Retail Shops, Apparel Sales, etc.) Personal Services (an establishment or place of business primarily engaged in providing individual services generally related to personal needs, such as a Tailor Shop, Shoe Repair, Self-Service Laundry, Laundry Pick-up Station, Dry Cleaning, Dance Studios, etc). Residential High Density (8-16 units per net acre). The total number of units for the entire site may not exceed 150 units. Automotive Repair Shop on Lot 3, Block 1, with the following standards: o No unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on-premises except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas. o All repair, assembly, disassembly and maintenance of vehicles shall occur within closed building except minor maintenance including, but not limited to, tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement. o No public address system. o No sales, storage or display of used automobiles or other vehicles such as motorcycles, snowmobiles, or all-terrain vehicles. o Disposal of vehicle fluids shall comply with PCA regulations. o Facilities for the collection of waste oil must be provided. o All service/garage doors shall be screened. o The building architecture shall complement surrounding buildings." c. Building Area Commercial/Office – Not to exceed 75,000 square feet for the entire development Maximum Commercial/Office lot usage is a Floor Area Ratio of 0.3 3 Maximum office/commercial building area per tenant may not exceed 8,000 square feet Maximum residential units may not exceed 150 units. d. Prohibited Ancillary Uses Drive-thru Windows except banks, coffee shops, fast food restaurants or pharmacies. Outdoor storage and display of merchandise such as propane, salt, window washer fluid, etc. except on the sidewalk surrounding the convenience store 4A. The outdoor display of merchandise shall not impede nor interfere with pedestrian traffic. e. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Boundary Building/ Parking Setbacks (feet) Lyman Boulevard 20/20 Highway 101 North of Highway 212 50/50 Highway 101 South of Highway 212 20/20 Highway 212 50/50 Northerly Project Property Line 50/20 Westerly Project Property Line 50/20 Internal Project property lines 0/0 Internal Right-of-Way (Crossroads Boulevard) 20/20 Hard Surface Coverage-Residential 50 % Commercial and Office Hard Surface Coverage 70 % Maximum Commercial (Retail) Building/Structure Height 1 story Maximum Office Building/Structure Height 2 stories Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less f. Non-Residential Building Materials and Design There shall not be underdeveloped backsides of buildings. All elevations shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article XXIII. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. g. Residential Standards Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article XXIII. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 1. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 4 2. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick, stone, etc. 3. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. h. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights-of-way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. 1. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to, truck loading areas, trash storage, parking lots, Large unadorned building massing, etc. 2. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 3. All open spaces and non-parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells shall be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. 4. Undulating berms, north of Lyman Boulevard, north and south of Highway 312 and west of Highway 101 shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. 6. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. i. Street Furnishings Benches, kiosks, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. j. Signage The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment and the business’s ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet 5 the city's goals: a. Establish standards which permit businesses a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise their name and service; b. Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination; c. Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; d. Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; e. Preserve and protect property values; f. Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; g. Limit temporary commercial signs and advertising displays which provide an opportunity for grand opening and occasional sales events while restricting signs which create continuous visual clutter and hazards at public right-of-way intersections. j.1. Project Identification Sign One project identification sign for the commercial portion of the development located at the entrance off of Highway 101. Project identification signs shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. As an alternative, the project identification sign may be located at the southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1. If the sign is located in the right-of-way, an encroachment agreement must be obtained. Otherwise, the sign must maintain a 10 foot setback from property lines and may not exceed 24 square feet nor be higher than 5 feet. j.2. Monument Sign One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrance to the development off of Lake Susan Drive. One monument sign per lot shall be permitted for the commercial portion of the site. One multi-tenant sign shall be permitted at the entrance into the development off of Highway 101 and two signs off of Lyman Boulevard. These signs shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than 5 feet in height except Kwik Trip, located on Lot 1, Block 1, shall be permitted a 48 square-foot, 8-foot high monument sign. These signs must comply with all ordinances pertaining to size and percent of sign area dedicated to gas prices as well as any other applicable regulations. These signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. j.3. Wall Signs 6 a. The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend above parapet height. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, or translucent facing. b. Second story illuminated signs that can be viewed from neighborhoods outside the PUD site, are prohibited. c. Tenant signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant’s proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 15% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. d. Wall signs are limited to two elevations per building. j.4. Festive Flags/Banners a. Flags and banners shall be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. b. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric or vinyl. c. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. d. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two feet. e. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. f. Flags and banners which are torn or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. j.5. Building Directory a. In multi-tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. j.6 Directional Signs a. On-premises signs shall not be larger than four (4) square feet. The maximum height of the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet from the ground. The placement of directional signs on the property shall be so located such that the sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties including site lines or confusion of adjoining ingress or egress) or the general appearance of the site from public rights-of-way. No more than four (4) signs shall be allowed per lot. The city council may allow additional signs in situations where access is confusing or traffic safety could be jeopardized. b. Off-premises signs shall be allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately routed through residential 7 streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. c. Bench signs are prohibited except at transit stops as authorized by the local transit authority. d. Signs and Graphics. Wherever possible, traffic control, directional and other public signs should be consolidated and grouped with other street fixtures and furnishings to reduce visual clutter and to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement. A system of directional signs should also be established to direct traffic within the commercial area and away from residential areas. j.7. Prohibited Signs Pylon signs are prohibited. Back lit awnings are prohibited. Window Signs are prohibited except for company logo/symbol and not the name. Such logo shall not exceed 10% of a window area. Menu Signs are prohibited. j.8. Sign Design and Permit Requirements a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. c. Wall business signs shall comply with the city’s sign ordinance for the Neighborhood business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the “street” front and primary parking lot front of each building. k. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the development. High pressure sodium vapor lamps or LED with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. Parking lot light poles may not exceed 25 feet in height. 2. Light fixtures in areas other than parking lots should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). Street light fixtures should accommodate vertical banners for use in identifying the commercial area. 3. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than ½ foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 4. Lighting for parking areas shall minimize the use of lights on pole standards in the parking area. Rather, emphasis should be placed on building lights and poles located in close proximity to 8 buildings. l. Non-Residential Parking 1. Parking shall be provided based on the shared use of parking areas whenever possible. Cross access easements and the joint use of parking facilities shall be protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. 2. The development shall be treated as an integrated shopping center and provide a minimum of one space per 200 square feet of commercial/retail area. The office/personal service component shall be treated as an integrated office building and provide 4.5 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 49,999 square feet, four per thousand square feet for the second 50,000 square feet, and 3.5 per thousand square feet thereafter. m. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements.” Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this -----th day of October, 2020, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Heather Johnston, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The purpose of this ordinance is to amend the Planned Unit Development for Gateway of Chanhassen to allow an automotive repair shop with standards. A printed copy of Ordinance No. _____ is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Manager/Clerk. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION this 14th day of December, 2020, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen. Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-21 8941 crossroads blvd (christian bros automotive)\revised documents 10-30-20\summary ordinance.doc kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651 645 4197 September 4, 2020 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, City Planner RE: Proposed Christian Brothers Automotive – Project Narrative Christian Brothers Automotive is requesting the proposed site to be considered for approval within the existing PUD. The parcel is legally described as: Lot 3, Block 1, Crossraods of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. Proposed Development Overview Christian Brothers Automotive is proposing to construct an approximately 5,100 SF, 9 -bay automotive repair center located at 8941 Crossroads Boulevard in Chanhassen. The customer facing portion of the building will face the internal road of the Crossroads of Chanhassen development. The proposed development is within the Crossroads of Chanhassen PUD which was approved in 2008. The two lots east of the proposed site have been previously developed as retail and a gas station/convenience store, a child care facility is located to the south and west of the proposed site, and the rest of the PUD is currently undeveloped. Proposed Concept Plan & Development Stage Christian Brothers Automotive is proposing an amendment to the existing planned unit development PUD). The PUD is designated as mixed use PUD including neighborhood commercial, office and residential. Christian Brothers provides light automotive repair and the scope of repairs provided by Christian Brothers has been included within the submittal package. Overnight parking only occurs when customers have a conflict retrieving their vehicle during business hours or to drop off their vehicles. Long term exterior storage is not permitted at Christian Brothers Automotive. Consultants: Civil Engineer – Christian Jones, Brandon R. Elegert, P.E. – Kimley-Horn Architecture – Dana King – Cortland Morgan Architect Landscape Architecture – Evergreen Design Group, Inc. – Rodney McNabb Photometrics – City Lighting Products Company – Mike Hohl Page 2 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651 645 4197 Site Design The site currently vacant land with water and sanitary sewer utilities provided as part of the Crossroads of Chanhassen Development to the south. Gas, communications, and electric utilities are provided to the west along Crossroads Boulevard. The proposed building is to be located at the western edge of the site angled parallel to Crossroads Boulevard, with the customer facing side of the building internal to the development. The surface parking will be located directly east of the building. Access is proposed to be east of the building and at both the north and south side of the parking lot, with two proposed driveways connecting the internal roads of the Crossroads of Chanhassen. The existing site is currently vegetated with no impervious area; the proposed site will be comprised of approximately 70% impervious area. Above ground and underground stormwat er management will be provided adhering to City and Watershed treatment and rate control requirements. Architecture Architectural elevations and site photometric plans are provided within the submission. The proposed building is to be constructed of primarily brick and limestone. The trash enclosure is also to be constructed in materials similar to the building and will have gates to screen the trash from the public right-of-way. Landscape Architecture A landscape plan is included within the submission to comply with the city code. Trees, shrubs, and other plantings will complement the site. Christian Brothers Automotive is seeking a landscape variance for screening of the vehicular area. Please contact me at (763) 251-1016 or christian.jones@kimley-horn.com should you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Christian Jones Project Manager This document, togetherwith the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_ LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C0-COVER SHEET.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10: 11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCOVER SHEETC0.08941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P. E.09/04/ 202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBRENORTH VICINITY N.T.S.SITE CHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY, MN 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ANSI FULL BLEED D (34.00 X 22.00 INCHES) SHEET.3.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/ OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/ OR UTILITY SERVICESCOMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES.4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED ( EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.NOTES: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT EVERGREEN DESIGN GROUP, INC.PO BOX 2193 GARNER, NC 27529 TELEPHONE: (800) 680-6630 FAX: (866) 579-8452 CONTACT: RODNEY MCNABB PROJECT TEAM: SURVEYOR EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC.1229 TAYLOR STREET NE, SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 TELEPHONE: ( 612) 466-3300 CONTACT: ERIC ROESER ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PREPARED BY: BRANDON R. ELEGERT,P.E. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN This document, togetherwith the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\ TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGENERAL NOTESC0.18941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREGENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" ( LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK,EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL.3.THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL " D" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02,ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK.4.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR' S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS.7.ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER.8.ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY.9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10.ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED.11.ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE.12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER.13.SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES:PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION,INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES 3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'D TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:DENSITY TEST REPORTS BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES,AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.2.ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.4.DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS.5.ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I.PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED.ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.6.WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE.7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.8.UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACK FILLING.9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10' AND A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18" BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES.11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER.12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.13.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE.14.TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW.15.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME.16.ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT.17.ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18.ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED.19.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.20.THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.21.A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED.22.GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES.23.COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION.24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS.25.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS.26.REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.27.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS.28.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS ( BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING.GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1.GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION.THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS,POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5.BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED.6.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED.7.AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED.8.WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED.9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS.10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11.FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO MN/DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.12.ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN.13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.14.SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION,SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER.16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATION.17. ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.19.LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20.IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.21.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION.22.BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE.23.ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS.ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24.ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D. E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.25.ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE.26.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FOR ASPHALT PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING.EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1.THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS.2.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MN NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS.3.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER.4.SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED,WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR.5.TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE.6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT.7.CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES.8.ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED.9.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS.10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11.RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE.12.ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE.13.ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESE AREAS WITH SOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY.14.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHICH THEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR STORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS,SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL, PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS.15.EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT.16. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ENGINEERING DIVISION.17.IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED AND/ OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE ALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5" RAINFALL EVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION.1.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.2.SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE.3.THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND.4.THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND.5. ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION.PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1.ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION)OR MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTY REGULATIONS.2.ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.4.ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB.5.THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET.6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT.7.THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.9.ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED This document, togetherwith the concepts and EXISTING SIGN TO BE REMOVED 921 921 922 922 922922923924921 922 923924924924921922 9231.70% 1.00% 2. 261. 17%0. 30%3. 69% 2. 89 0. 82%1. 4 5 4.51% 0.86%2.351.75%A A A A50. 0'20.0'PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING8" PVC SANITARY SEWERPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING 10" DIP WATERMAIN PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING 27" HDPE SANITARY SEWERCROSSROADS BOULEVARDPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITIES (TYP.) SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TREE (TYP.) PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TREES,TYP.) PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TREE TYP.) PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TREES AND PLANTER, TYP. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER 4.6 8SF SF SFSFREMOVE STUB TO MAIN, CAP PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_ LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN. dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORDEMOLITION ANDEROSIONCONTROL - PH.1PLANC1.08941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBRE1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS,PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.2.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES.5.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK.6.ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK.7.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.8.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC.AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY AND MN/DOT. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION.10.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED.11.CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR.12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED.13.REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS.14.ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES.15. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS. 16.IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.17.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER.DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES NORTH KEYNOTE LEGEND INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE A B LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (OFFSET FOR CLARITY)REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J- BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1.ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.3.WITHIN TWO WEEKS (14 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS.4.ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION.6.ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR.7.REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.9.IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS.10.IN THE EVENT OF FROZEN SOILS, THE GC MAY UTILIZE BIO LOG. THE GC IS TO PROHIBIT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE.11.A PRE- CONSTRUCTION MEETING SHALL BE HELD AT CITY HALL WITH THE ENGINEERING DIVISION AND EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. A PLAN SHOWING HAUL ROUTES WILL BE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL AT THIS MEETING AS OUTLINED IN THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT.UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGESIN PREPAREDFOREROSIONANDSEDIMENTCONTROLDETAILSC1. 18941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/ 04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-EROS DETAILS.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1 3B 3A 4 5 2 1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME,FERTILIZER, AND SEED. 2.BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH.ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET.3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOILSURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACEBY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS PER MANUFACTURES CROSSROADS BOULEVARDCCPROPOSED CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE 5,100 SF FFE: 923. 00'26.0'26. 0'9. 0' TYP.18.0'18. 0'9. 0' TYP. 9. 0' TYP. EX. 20' BUILDING AND PARKING SETBACK PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA BB C D H F F F G G G G EX. PROPERTY LINE EX. 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EX. PROPERTY LINE 10. 0' A A E 26. 0' 8 16 2 5 G B B 18 0 16 0 20.0 PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN SEE ARCH PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PAD EX. LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN 5.0' 14.5'22 0 21. 0'6.0'= 55°42'56"R= 270.00' L=262.55'CB= N28°21' 12"E C=252. 33'S55° 34' 14" E 96.19' S0°00'00" E 170. 67'N90° 00' 00" W 199. 20'26 0 PROPOSED 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT10.0' 20.0'PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING STALL 56.1'30 3 K KK PR. "NO PARKING" SIGN PR. STOP SIGN PR. STOP SIGN DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E. 09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREBUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 34,691 SF (0. 80 AC)BUILDING AREA 5, 100 SF (14.7% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA)PUD ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM HARD SURFACE COVERAGE 34,691 SF * 70%24, 284 SF PROPOSED HARD SURFACE COVERAGE 23,656 SF PARKING REQUIRED PARKING 22 SPACES PROPOSED PARKING 31 SPACES ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 2 STALLS / 2 STALLS EXISTING OVERALL PUD PARKING 247 SPACES PROPOSED OVERALL PUD PARKING 278 SPACES PROPERTY SUMMARY 8941 CROSSROADS BLVD ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PARKING SETBACKS CROSSROADS BLVD = 20'INTERNAL PROJECT ROADS = 0'BUILDING SETBACKS CROSSROADS BLVD = 20'INTERNAL PROJECT ROADS = 0'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSEDSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA LEGEND KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK MATCH EXISTING EDGE OFPAVEMENT/ CURB & PREPAREDFORSITEDETAILSC2.18941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/ 04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without writtenauthorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651- 645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\ PlanSheets\C4-SITE DETAILS.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:12pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION9' 9'9'18.0'(PER PLAN)HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGN 4" PAINTED WHITE STRIPING 4" WHITE STRIPE AT 2'-0" O.C.NOTE: REFER TO PLAN FOR DETAILED LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS CURB AND GUTTER NO PARKING" SIGN, CENTERED AT HEAD OF SPACE, 2'MIN. AND 8' MAX FROM FACE OF CURB. NO SIGN REQUIRED IF THE SIGN OBSTRUCTS A CURB RAMP OR PEDESTRIAN ROUTE.NO PARKING PAINT THE WORDS " NO PARKING" WITHIN EACH 9'-0" ACCESS AISLE WHERE SHOWN USE 12" MINIMUM HIGHWHITE LETTERSHANDICAPACCESSIBLESIGN1/2" 6" 12" FIN. GRADE60"-66"' 18" WHITE SYMBOL ONBLUEBACKGOUNDLEGEND & BORDER: WHITE BACKGROUND: BLUENOTES: 1. ALL LETTERS ARE 1" AERIES "C" PER MUTCD.2.SIGN SHALL HAVE A REFLECTORIZED (ENGINEERING GRADE) BLUE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE REFLECTORIZED LEGEND AND BORDER.3.FINE NOTIFICATION SIGN SHALL HAVE A REFLECTORIZED (ENGINEERING GRADE) WITH WHITE LEGEND AND BORDER. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY FINE AMOUNT.5. ONE(1) SIGN REQUIRED FOR EACH PARKING SPACE. 6. INSTALLED HEIGHT OF SIGN SHALLBE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 24-23 OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROLDEVICES (MUTCD) AND STATE OF MINNESOTAACCESSIBILITY CODE.7.ALL ACCESSIBLE FEATURESTO BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.ASTANDARDS AND LOCAL LAWS.SIGNAGE K-1479 12"x6" PLAQUE TYPICAL AT ALL VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PARKING VEHICLE ID REQUIRED UP TO $200 FINE FOR VIOLATION 2'-9"3'- 0"WHITE LEGEND RED BACKGROUND30" 30"CURB TAPER B612 CURB AND GUTTER TR A N S I T I O N LE N G T H V A R I E S SE E P L A N 20"PAVEMENT SECTIONS ARE PROVIDED AS A COURTESY ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL PAVEMENT, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS 7" 4,000 PSI CONCRETE PER MNDOT 2301 4" AGGREGATE BASE PER MNDOT CLASS V IN SECTION 3138 APPROVED SUBGRADE HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL N.T.S.PAVEMENT DETAILS (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)7 N.T.S.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE3 N.T.S.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL4 N. T.S.ADA ACCESS AISLE NO PARKING6N. T.S. TYPICAL ACCESSIBLE STALL PARKING5 N.T.S.CONCRETE CURB TRANSITION8 N. T.S.R1-130"X30" " STOP" SIGN9 1.5" BITUMINOUSWEAR PREPAREDFORSITEDETAILSC2.28941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is DCROSSROADS BOULEVARDLP:922.21 LP:922.04 ME:921.27 ME:923.58 ME:921.95 922.00 923.00 922.87 922.25 922.16 922.25 922.40 922.19 922.05 922.23 922.50922.52 922.60 922.60 922.47 921.75 921.85 921.88 923.20 EOF:922.40 922.53 922.95 922.79 2.29% 1.10% 1.67% 2. 17%1. 37%2. 2 0 1.91% 1. 00% 1. 07%2.90%9 2 3 924922922922 923924922 921 921921922 922 922 922 923 922PROPOSED CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE 5, 100 SF FFE: 923. 00'ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 923.00 923. 00 923. 00 923. 00 922. 95 922. 89 A A A A A A B B B 50. 0'20. 0'B B B1. 55%1.31%1.35 922.44 922.66 922. 23 LP:921.85 2. 44 3.38%BP-1: STORMWATER INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM OF BASIN: 919.50 TOP OF BASIN: 921. 50 100-YR HWL: 920. 78 STORAGE VOLUME: 1, 645 SF LP:922.15 10 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.00% ST-17 CONNECT TO U/G INFILTRATION SYSTEM IE:917.51 W ST- 18 CONNECT TO U/G INFILTRATION SYSTEM IE: 917. 60 SE ST- 16 CONNECT TO U/G STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IE:917.92 N ST- 9 CBMH W/ 3' SUMP RE:922.04 IE:917.66 W IE:917. 66 E OCS- 1 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE PROVIDE 6" WIDE WEIR WALL TOP OF WEIR WALL: 918.50 RE:922.56 IE: 915.40 S ST-11 CB 24"X36"W/ 3' SUMP RE:921. 83 IE: 917.80 NW ST-8 CATCH BASIN, CONNECT TO U/ G STORM SEWER RE:921.85 ST-20 CONNECT TO EX. STORM STRUCTURE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY INV. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IE:915.20 N IE: 915.40 S BMP 2: UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SYSTEM ADS 36" N- 12 PERFORATED HDPE PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME: 6,238 CF TOP OF PIPE: 918. 90 PIPE INV.: 915.90 BOTTOM OF STONE: 915. 40 100- YR HWL: 918. 80 ME:921.68 EOF: 922.80 EOF: 921.50 2.0 0 2 5 0%2.6 1 24 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1. 00%ST-26 CORE DRILL AND CONNECT TO EX. STORM STRUCTURE PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS IE:920. 96 SE 19 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1. 06%56 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0. 50%922.25 ST- 7 CB 27" DIA.W/ 3' SUMP RE:922.15 IE:918. 20 S 56 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0. 50%31 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0. 50% 922. 50 922. 50 922. 50 922.50 923.00 923.00 A 9239 2 3 922922 92292192092 1 922922923923922923 922 ST- 25 24" RISER PIPE W/ DOME GRATE TOP OVERFLOW ELEV = 921.20 IE: 921.20 NW EXPOSED FOUNDATION 7.83 EOF:920.81 ST-29 CB 27" DIA. W/ 3' SUMPRE: 919. 99 IE:917. 94 E ADJUST RIM TO PROPOSED GRADE LP:921.95 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\ CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:12pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGRADING,DRAINAGE &EROSION CONTROLPH. 2 PLANC3.08941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/ 2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBRENORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN,SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/ CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS.8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS.13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL.14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/ CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% ( 1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A. D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES.16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0. 5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDSLOWPOINTS. 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION 918.50 OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION.19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS.20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE.21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.23.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10' OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES,CHAPTER 474, SECTION 1109.PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100. 00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION LP:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1.ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.3.WITHIN TWO WEEKS (14 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED,SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS.4.ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY,STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION.6.ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR.7.REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.9.IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS.10.IN THE EVENT OF FROZEN SOILS, THE GC MAY UTILIZE BIO LOG (EROS-11). THE GC IS TO PROHIBIT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE.UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN,PORTA- POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE ASFOLLOWS: 1. TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE.2. INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, UNDERGROUND SYSTEM, CURBS AND GUTTERS.3.INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AS EACH INLET STRUCTURE IS INSTALLED.4.PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE.5.PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING.6.PAVE SITE AND INSTALL STRIPING.7.INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES FOR PAVED AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES. 8.COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION PREPAREDFORGRADINGANDDRAINAGEDETAILSC3.18941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\ CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING DETAILS.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:13pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONUNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES 1.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE (2) DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER TESTS WITHIN THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM EXCAVATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE RESULTS TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL OVER-EXCAVATE ALL TOPSOIL AND FILL AS NECESSARY TO NATIVE FREE DRAINING SOILS. EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPLACED WITH SUITABLE ENGINEERED FILL MEETING THE MNDOT SPECIFICATION FOR COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE PER SECTION 3149.2H. DEPTHS OF FILL/URBAN FILL EXPECTED TO VARY, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DEPTHS OF EXCAVATION AND PERFORM INFILTROMETER TESTS PRIOR TO INSTALLING UNDERGROUND SYSTEM.3.IF NATIVE SUBGRADE SOILS BELOW FILL ARE DETERMINED TO NOT BE CONDUCIVE TO THE DESIGN INFILTRATION REQUIREMENTS,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND REPLACE THE POORLY INFILTRATING SOILS TO A DEPTH WHERE THE EXISTING NATIVE SUBGRADE SOILS MEET OR EXCEED THE DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE AS REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER.4. UPON COMPLETION OF THE STORMWATER BMP AND FINAL STABILIATION OF THE TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THE BMP AFTER A SIGNIFICAT RAIN EVENT THAT SHOWS THE BMPS DRAWS DOWN WITHIN 48 HOURS.5.NO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL TRAVEL WITHIN THE UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SYSTEM AREA. USE EXCAVATOR WITH TOOTHED BUCKET FOR INFILTRATION BASIN EXCAVATION TO AVOID COMPACTING OR SMEARING OF SOILS.6.FINAL EXCAVATION OF UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SYSTEM AREA AND INSTALLATION OF OF ENGINEERED SOIL MUST OCCUR IN DRY SOIL CONDITIONS TO PREVENT SMEARING AND COMPACTION. DO NOT WORK IN INFILTRATION SYSTEM AREA IF SOIL CONDITIONS ARE WET.7.IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION, THE EXCAVATION FOR THE TRENCH SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED BACKFILL MATERIAL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION, OR THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCE AND OR BIO- ROLLS SUCH THAT ON-SITE SOILSDO NOT ENTERTHETRENCHEXCAVATION AND CLOG UP THE BOTTOM/SIDES OF THE TRENCH LIMITING THEINFILTRATIONCAPACITYOF THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM.8.IF ANY SOILS ENTER THE CROSSROADS BOULEVARDD A A F A A F E H G F D I J PR. TRANSFORMER PAD, SEE PLANS BY OTHERS FOR DETAILS K PR. GAS METER, SEE MEP PLANS FOR DETAILS A C CONNECT TO EXISTING BY OTHERS) B L RIM: 922. 55 INV: 912. 08 RIM:922. 74 INV: 912. 51 D WYE CONNECTION INV: 912. 50 REMOVE EX. 8" SANITARY SEWER STUB,CONSTRUCT PR 6" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. CONNECT AND SEAL CONNECTION PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS INV: 910.8 N INV: 910.7 W INV: 910.8 E RIM: 922. 75 INV: 912. 50 D CONNECT TO EXISTING BY OTHERS)WYE CONNECTION INV: 912. 08 21 LF @ 2. 0%64 LF @ 2. 0%UTILITY CROSSING EX. 27" STRM BOTTOM: 912. 60 6" SSWR TOP: 911. 18 CLEARANCE: 1. 42'WATERMAIN CROSSING,MAINTAIN 1.5' CLEARANCE 95 LF WATERMAIN CROSSING,MAINTAIN 1.5' CLEARANCE UTILITY CROSSING 12" STRM BOTTOM: 918. 90 6" SSWR TOP: 911. 40 CLEARANCE: 7. 50'PROPOSED CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE 5,100 SF FFE: 923. 00'RIM:922. 65 INV: 913. 06 INV: 913. 19 PR. STORM SEWER, SEE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR DETAILS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, SEE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR DETAILS 10. 0'PR. POWER, SEE MEP PLANS FOR DETAILS PR. 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EX. 27" HDPE STORM SEWER INV: 912. 71 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW. KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\ 3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:13pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORUTILITY PLANC4.08941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREUTILITY PLAN NOTES 1.ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES.2.SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 16' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 16'- 26' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3.WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241.4.MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.5.ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS.6.ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN ( 10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18"VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE).7.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES.8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES,STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50).9.LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING.10.TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS.11.ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P. S.I.12.EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES.13.REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES.15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.16.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19. BACKFLOW DEVICES ( DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED ANDMAINTAINED. 21.ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINEDWITH REACTION BLOCKING. NORTH KEYNOTE LEGEND POINT OF CONNECTION, REFER TO MEP PLANS FOR CONTINUATION TAP EXISTING WITH 3 4" CORP 3/4" DOMESTIC COPPER WATER SERVICE INSTALL CLEANOUT CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE INSTALL 6" PVC SDR40 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE, LENGTH AND SLOPE PER PLAN PROPOSED GREASE INTERCEPTOR LOCATION, REFER TO PREPAREDFORUTILITYDETAILSC4.18941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORTWAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT CROSSROADS BOULEVARDCCNORTH LEGEND EX- CCOLOR SITE PLANEXHIBIT09/18/ Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212, Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 Office (952) 466-5200 | Fax (952) 466-5223 | www.co.carver.mn.us CARVER COUNTY September 25, 2020 City of Chanhassen c/o Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner 952-227-1134 saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Re: Development / Access Review Comments: Amendment to the Chanhassen Gateway Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Conditional Use Permit for Christian Brothers Automotive at 8941 Crossroads Blvd – Located near the intersections of CSAH 101 Great Plains Blvd.)/Crossroads Blvd. and CSAH 18 (Lyman Blvd.)/Crossroads Blvd. Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject development in the City of Chanhassen. Please reference the Public Works Development Review Process document on the County’s website for detailed instructions. The County assumes compliance with State Statute 505.03 Subdivision 2 regarding road authority review. Consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and County Codes, the following are comments and recommended conditions of approval and potential requirements for any necessary permits to be issued for the project: 1. Impacts to County Right of Way and Access to County Highways a. The subject site is not adjacent to County right of way and no direct access to County Highways is proposed. Additional County review and approval will be required if this condition changes. 2. Traffic Impacts a. It is recommended to provide a brief traffic memo identifying changes to PUD trip generation levels, traffic patterns, or impacts to the County highway intersections of CSAH 101 (Great Plains Blvd.)/Crossroads Blvd. and CSAH 18 (Lyman Blvd.)/Crossroads Blvd. compared to the original PUD plan and traffic study. The memo should note the expected level of service at these intersections and any findings that impact future traffic operation needs. 3. Required Permits a. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way (none currently proposed), the applicant shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility or Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) from Carver County Public Works: (http://www.co.carver.mn.us/how-do-i/apply-for/a-permit). Final details of locations, grades, and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed and approved prior to any permits. b. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on County highways from current or approved conditions will need to remedied or updated at development expense, including costs incurred by the County. These are the County’s comments at this time. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please contact staff noted below: Joan Guthmiller Administrative Technician Carver County Public Works 952.466.5201 jguthmiller@co.carver.mn.us Angie Stenson AICP Sr. Transportation Planner Carver County Public Works 952.466.5273 astenson@co.carver.mn.us Dan McCormick, P.E. PTOE Traffic Services Supervisor Carver County Public Works 952.466.5208 dmccormick@co.carver.mn.us CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COLNTYOFCARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 19,2020, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk ofthe City ofChanhassen' Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy ofthe attached notice ofa Public Hearing to consider a request for an amendment to the chanhassen Gateway PUD to allow Automotive Repair Shops; and an amendment to the Crossroads of chanhassen site Plan with variances for the construction of a 51100 sf automotive repair shop @uilding 4E) located at 8941 Crossroads Boulevard. Zoned Planned Unit Development @UD). Planning Case No. 2020-21to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy ofsaid notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses ofsuch ownets were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Kim T. Meuwissen, Deputy Cl Subscribed and swom to be me JEAiI M SIECI(LJI{G ilmry n..Io.ilfnt€.ota ry*i3rar..Lltr,r@1 t thisRlh day of 2020. Notary Public Seal) 2 Disclaiire, This map is rErther a legally rccorded map nor a survey and is not intendd lo be used as one. This map is a comFilaton of reco.ds, informatron and data located in various city, county, state and tederal offices and other sources regading the area shown and is to be ud for refeence purposs only The City does not wanant thal the Geographic lniormatbn System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are eror free, ancl the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navioatjonal. tracking or any other Durpose requidng exacting measurement of distance or dareclion or precision in the depiction of geoOhphic features. The prerceding disclaimer is provided pu6uant to Minnesota stalutes s466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and lhe uger of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damag€s, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, andemnify. and hold hamless the City ftom any and all daams blought by User, its employees or agents. or third parties which ads€ out of the use/s access or use of data provrded. TAX_NAMEI cTAX_ADD-LI r cTAX_ADD_L2l Next RecordD(TAX-NA lEr I<TAX_ADD_Llr ITAX_ADD_L2r This map is nejther a leoally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to b€ used as one. This mep is a compilaton of records, informatlon and data located in vaious crty, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to b€ used for reference purposes only. The Crty does not wanant that the Geographic lniormaton System (GlS) Data used to prepare tiis map are enor free. and the City does not represenl thal the GIS Oata can be used for navigat,onal, t acking or any other purpose requiring exactng measurernenl of distance or directon or precision in the deprcton ol geographic features. The preceding d6daamer is provrded pulsuant to Minnesota Stat es y66.03. Subd. 21 (2000), and tne user of this map acknowledge5 Ulat tie City shall not be liaue for any damages, and e)Q.essly waives all daims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold hamless lhe Crty from any and allclaims b.ought by User, its employees or agents. or thard partres whici atise out of the use/s acaess or use of dala provided. rv ID I ; E-.tIF-: J tl. EI I z J r :":ri.:--7 I ti r I o, E q E P EI 2 F E cioIF. oNoN o) o Eoo IDotoE o) fF 2( I) o ooF. F- u; tu. o E o c oo r o olc o Eo. 9o o,)o c5rF SE ca :c(!< : r! h }EEE€ O ., YE s! gEs otl Q o_-;? xesk >, --, I ar EX:fE66: E: 39EE:; T€ EP-. e* 6; I 9E c E I rE;!: 6 o ;a E acorlrr Ee54ii!.=-E':b 88ts tr EEO(, o E 6q) rn'6 o 06 c oI 9 Ev q) g o 06 o o! EY o c] .iU'9 6E i9. oo op uJoeE' oo NO D o cob9o AcYOot loor-@< EiE€ Elo:Ylo6tq- o-c- Y. ar0cDE .!1 ; r'6 I 9i5 ;o c E oo F>org odiF-cir o = oE- rJ tt*.l'= Ee 4 EEE E dr ^L c O- -Y EE-pe E + e E; HE:i.A; 94i"9.96!! riEqEsaS rEa-gs= H : E EtE sE t E' s iE:8-EEo-o *E t HE.9 iE:TEE5Ee339.. F O (! OF N (Y) \t EDE 0, o E 9 2 E Eoo E! c o o i,$ilE$tE EiEiriEEEsPaEd.33E =':.,lB =.!e rrb lll BE; a-EEEEtt! aeltflatE; eIIE EI $E€ u; oocoq) g o)oc- BoEg EE:g La6.> Eoo0) O^ cE XE.( tr 6_9 cr(0ol' 6o oU OE.> t3pE6 eEo-; fEcEODL @P 9fiPzii l oi'-o o o) E aoc fc Ec 0) 5. cc GEq 6 z E a 3 I t*Effis:EtiiE gEltIiEgggEilEEi liisEi;e:iiiEEaffEa EF oa, o t! o Eo t!(, oJ oo CI iio o EoiLor trr.9 o.Geto-J 9glt d, .= E r! .c E c6 .. o9trcO{, 6= rl, E3Ooo 6c oo gro o EC LE. 9oEo5E' G.S bE 0, l!. 9dot2g ot! c!! o C'c alto P.E r!o(, '= E( JE onri t gt otr sE: q 2=" oooEEt! Eo 9 oIc6;.YoeE x oo>oo.. r! llor€ oE9r3a B_aEi9EE€ ExP g t1iooFU)'=06 .! (! sE€E.: g O, rJ o E t* 5:Ei9P96 AEtr.StEie 5.= 3 e eE 3? a1E 6 Jc P *eE650 Bq oS:<(!- J O- cE 3E aO !.r3E- c EtB Rlfr 31.!D; l cr t ZlE s El0'o Elclo,old E HI€> - al l., El o E EI€'dq9 b.Et b.,.l P ailH o o 9e cn E Q' o, E q, a Io o) co I o(, o li o F-(\l 6t t o s q) o- e oI t co o c G q @tso I o G Eo q,(, E 9 9 E Eoo Eo o. E o oE o o'6 o 6 o o,)! E Y i 2d)d a .9. PBoLi .9. o OE ur ' 6 e.fr' ooEiqo 6: cob9aqe YOoE o< o{ E* E;xo =x=-: ilt B* € iis rlH , fi EeaaeEE O - ;jg ! . O--Y EiEg€E;riETEAEE{ E; s+ EsEgo659IEIo.9;.56tori.! Q6;OEE( Ei BH= cE td:<E q F€d.e=.e6F6doo-o-o F G a! O-- N (t t E 9 F E cio9F. oNoN o)- o E( l) o o)o; o! q) aF L p E e 2m o E ooF. F. o. o Eo o c oo nI o s E N! i* EIOELL odF6 NSEio O- r).c t o:oca:; 9EE:bqE0'nz>+( E ot - hN=* o 6*. EE9Eg;a Eo,c: coofo-c Q (6 E(D ffi,::!. E<: o AEo 6tro.r) o qp o o 6 o o 9. o) E(! o o c) o. J o F G f o- c o) o o 1 q) 6 o 06 oI 9 EY o. lc. q o l) E oc lc EE o.) o- cE([ Eq o oo C) ooi u, 6 It). c o o o, a, oooa Eo oIt)p E rt, o) f E E ui o( lt o, co'- 5 E oc o) Eo 5 E o) o 6 oo o c. 9 U) uJz o lioac n) o) o o,c n)o E E 0) E a g€EEp Ei EP EEIEEE;iEE:; EESgBEEtEiiE E?tEitIlErigEE;: E E IIBJ:: H;:€ i '-:f:;ia;;eEIrgEEeEfEFEE$i EiEEEiiEEEiEEE EEE B?eEEEEEEEE EEtEEiEi3AgEiEE sEig€Eigte;EEE E 3 q E z I E 6 5 a E I E E 6 6 .. o9ECoo o= OE3Ogo o o otr; o Eocto G tsoa, 'E cL a! eto-J qa o.= o. !l r'E o.€ E id i: o5 0, clo o oJ l! ooco G qo o t! 6orLo o. 9o o ooQQQnQO9OQe)e)OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOc)c,c|.{ d !t @ o) o o .\. .n < Ln O'r O ..,r m !^ or sl r^ @ F\ oO m .{ r^ (o F\ co 6 O H - m - r^ 6 - - <'iOornoo (o N o F{ d d q, n n !r Q !r':r i n d d O O o o o 6 6 i H i i ; - H o d ; rrQQQ <) I .r F{ Q O O a Cf o o o o o O O O o <) o O O O 6 6 o o o O O c) o o - o <) c)ce (D i. t t m + 0Q Q' a a a rg st st sr 9 <r sl q <t rr F- F. T. F. F F F F- F. l< F |< F F F F F F.!o sl @ co o .! .{ st 0o to .o oo a @ q) q, oo !9 ao @ co 60 <t <t 6 co .o 6 @ .o oo .o .o 6 6 6 <t (o (o ioryEQ, a Q, Ql ry r- F: .: r: c] a a Q F. o o o o o ca o0 d !r d ai n - - ti - - - ;i .a F. F Fv'!t4 4 '4 ul 14 ' 4 rrl {r {r !n L,ll.rarnI^ ln !/1 !^ !^ rr1 rnI^rn !n .^ !^ !^ r^ !,r rn Ln !^ !n !^ !a !/) i-oin6- at a{ .! .!.! ^t .{ a\l .\t r\ N.!.r N a{ a\ N a\t N a\.!.! N ^ i o-d6- t^ t^ a \^ t^ tA t^ t^ t^ tA.^ a 88IOEG,G,GG,G,.tC,GGEG, OOO66OOOO6OO lrJ tr.r r! a t^ t^.^ (,(9(, rrr-riiiiiii === SSSSSeeHHHHHggggsuuohhh 5 3 5 5 64443 3 3 3 ????€ E E E*8F, 9, z 222 22 2 2 2 2 ) ) ) ) zl I I EEEEH=I55EE565EEEEE=999 rn ln 6 r,t rn i H .r .t m an rf (6{o6Hdirndrn {o F\ ao cD o !n lar.n !n 6 6 !,t r./l !n r^ 6 Llt 6 dr dr diinF\ F\ l\ f,\ F- 0o @ 0o.O @ @.O @.a o0 o.o co - 6 6 6 6 6 6066(^ 6666JJJ<!!! l!! d,d,c, a>5> Y>=> 9f,:)f ororoo q6; q:= JTO=FF- 3;""y, t<iiQQ3P=66. IALEE 8:EApp<(^ oduol.uo!^r^oo @or(Dsld(^\D6oF-F- F$ E$. $E gg P EEHSH H HE *S.r (n TFFF..: or o! c. 00o@6@ oo ++ " g ","i r- .t n 9X N N N !? F\ \ F\ F. <r F\ r'\ r.\ r- F i r- n r.. r'. i * F N Fl r- * r.. r.<t <t vro.iYdddrr id;iiiiiHAam (o @ q:.n o.n S.nm m rn.n.n ri.n.n !') an m rn .n lYl m.n.n.n m., m m.n.n rn .nmfls3 _ 3 ; x 4 I S S ti S B S 3 S 3 S * * S S S S S S * n 3 S * S S 3 B n $ S * i fr fr * H g 4 B : : 2 i !, i a i 4 a i i i i_ i i i i i i i i i i i i 2 i 2 i i 2 i 2 i i i nvvv F H H E uivuafrfrvvavahvavvauuuva-sa E r r 3. s s j j { i f i E i + f + r s + s f s + + s + + $ s $ $ + s f $ + + + f $-tz z; ttt t^ < < z Z Z z z z z z z 2 z z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z 2 - Z = - = =< O Or I rF r- = I - -= I rI - O - I I I I - -- I r r - r r II r r - -I IjFruy (J (J i, i^ z u (J e z e (J (J o ur (J (J O O O O O O O O O O O O U O O O O O - O O Zo<od 6 o .Lo_a_ FUJFd F ." <???!?,*t1,1 ut6a ggg 4Gddde,t)G,d,dce,o A E ;00006,,.16666oe22 =92!2!=22!2! 229o_= a ddc.e 5 |, = J!:=|:-:!J=) Ii j. 6 oooi l;;ir= EE EEEEEEEEEAeA= ?!ggt1g=i1ii= a=EE6'|-'o H> <r'r rr': I I I ZvEEEd-EPEEE= lE55EE6;EEE6U= g g9:, 8 S P X E 91i A i ie Y 9 9 9 e 9 9 9 Y e 1- !^ o,.o F. H !', (h ol r c.,, s (o){ !n F- tr) c) \o !^ c) ln Or rn F- o Ln r/t rr a O !^ Lo r^ 16 rJt d rnt s i 6!^roro (o dm.nli< m F d.{ m (h o N or o o rr.r.n $ 'a rl !/l io t-.(i oi o r^ ui iri a lri ' n Jr ;t ./i rri 6 6 !^ or oi iiariF!r.r.trYr.n.nr^I^r^ro(DF-r.-F\F-F-F-F.FF.F-F-.o.odi.(j-('d-od-od.d--6cd66 FFFF oooo oooo oooo JoguJ< 9LUHEE>r6 E = a3 H qeE s e q== iEEE= IE H r;e : E -s64 z E EsEEEEIBEE*;EE*EEEiEE=5E==EE:rE;EEEEE 3=;iE;!;=*!EEfiEEIEEE= Ea irBb= s "ga-=iBEE= - EE =- Jz= = t ,tt6re'2< -r oay 2 oa oz o 6 6 (D @ @ @ Co @ @ @ 0o co c! Q o!' 09 !! 9-o 9o cocbA :l 6 6 6 6 6 6 (o b (o @ ii (o 6 6 io @ (o (D to !9 !9 !0 \o (orovl.i 6 6 6 n n n n n -J ..J i n 5 6 or 6' 6 u (, (n L 5a5(, rt,:-;.1 i 6 d di \i .h u A (! r.i p \D n (n u, P (o .{ L ur lD r\r o co O'!aa aa.ttj6a<t4 14t4U't4qoa: HPPP=PP=P<PPPCPSP=PE8PPE8PF -< = = - < = = < = < = = --r a i --{ --{ > --{ --{ -.{ --{ -{ -.1 --{ -.{OTTIIF-I=-=III--TI6)--I-I-II':=== E==E=E===€€€E-=={€€€€€ EEEnqEaEnEqqEqqqsqEqqEEqq;===x==x= x=== ====q======- - FEFVEF;iVSFEEEEEEEEE!EEEE2'6'c1 -6 66 6 616o6a:)anan 6)66)6lo6)6)oaii;i m- rmm4-e-bbb bb b b600000aaaaasaaE€€ €g e cceggee ceeeseee 6 6 .1 .1 .) .) r) .) .) at al rt o 6 6 a) .) o o o o o o>tiiiai-iii- jii--I---rIr-II A a Z ? Z Z Z 2_? Z == z z z z z z z z z z z z z z2H**I*sIIt***ItrI*fSI***iEEE2Z'6 i''6 i^ i^'6 a^ v\ 'u1 in a^ -q i^ a^ a^ tn t a^ a a q u, t v\ t,. l"C 6;i;66a;i 66ata^a t 11 v1 a^ 6 a vt a a \4 lt t \ tA i; in ri n! nr m m m m m ir - m m m r m m a ? ? ? ? "? ??? ? ??? ??? ? ? ? 6 s. 2 z - = - 2 - = 2 2 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z2FEssssssssssuussBsssssB$sgsnJ =; i ni ni ni ni 6J ae au u,, '.! u, (, (,@ u, (, oJ (, u, (,t u, ur (! (rr iiP-EE-;;i;iiiiiFPPoN{ ! { ! -r { \J.{..r ! {.{ \J !rJ \J -.1 !! \l'.J:J! {\J<*J -"i -d;& -d; - d; &&&&& && &&aee! IG 6 6 L,i an .n r,(nan(/llJi ! !r! !!(Jl(,(nu'; 5o a. 66 do co @-o@@ a. c. q,aa@@ 6 6 66 6 tlt 6iato@ro (o(.l ro(o(o@ 6 6 6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ca @ @co 6 @ @ @ aa @F6666i66b (o b \o ro @ @ 6 \o (o tO ao (o (D \O Q p !o (o5EE;;=;;x;J:sssSEs$$sAt3sv,t^t t49r6566666666ooOOOOoooooQQQo-E-E---ccccCc-ecccccccccc! - i = --{ --l --{ --r -.1iiiiiii-iiirrrirr--rrrr-r E========a{€€€{{{€EEE<ri ri ri ri ri.'i ni ni m m rri ri nFq!!lP9199222199Ig22222222299.24 E'EE'Fii5''EEsEEEEEEEE''c\'61'ct'6 -Gt -a -6 6 6 6 6 Zr 6, o 6 6 an an o o o 6) o O 6) ninirrin;mrnm55555555555555555666666E6EEEEggegccccccceeeeseeees o o a I I"JNNJI\,^JNNJNJ ^ JNI\JNJNI9I!\?N'NNJi.i ii :i ii n n n{ ir..r -r..1 n n n'{ ! ! '.J \.r .'l {{ !:r>l:lEdddo' or oi oi oi oi or or o\ o1 ororootolqoro!oo1 or(^ol EHEEEddEHEEdEEHEd$EdddHdEHE5EXEEEEEsEsEtsgg838336ts38838 PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PUD, MODIFICATION TO PUD-SPECIFIC DESIGN FEATURES, AND AMENDMENT TO CROSSROADS OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN WITH VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 5,100 SQUARE-FOOT AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SHOP LOCATED AT 8941 CROSSROADS BOULEVARD. Weick: I will give it to Sharmeen. Al-Jaff: Thank you Chairman and members of the Planning Commission. The application before you is for a site plan to allow an automotive repair shop within the Crossroads Development. The site is located southwest of Crossroads Boulevard. It has an area of .79 acres and is zoned Planned Unit Development. Just a brief background on this. The 2030 Land Use Plan guided the site mixed-use. The area surrounding 212/101 intersection has been guided mixed use. These are the types of designations for uses that will meet the daily needs of the surrounding area. They also will accommodate high-density residential developments. In 2005 the City approved a concept plan for this area overall location and basically the area located north of Highway 212 was guided residential. The southern portions was a combination of commercial as well as office spaces. Again with the intent that these are neighborhood types of commercial uses that will meet the daily needs within this vicinity. We began working with Christian Bros. approximately six or seven months ago. This is an auto repair facility. Auto repair shops are not a permitted use within the Crossroads Development. As part of the work that we asked of them we needed a complete design that they submitted. The request is for a 5,100 square-foot building. Because this is a Planned Unit Development the overall site coverage is calculated as not to exceed 70%. In this case the total hard surface coverage within this entire development is 43.8%. The architecture of the building and design is attractive. All four elevations of the proposed building have received equal attention. Materials used on the building are of high quality. It is proposed to include brick, block, EFIS, as well as metal. The garage doors (there will be nine of them) are proposed to be made of glass and metal. They are fully screened. The overall design of the building is compatible and harmonious with existing buildings as well as future proposed buildings. This is accomplished through using compatible materials, complementary design elements including parapet walls, pronounced entryway, use of canopies over the windows, awnings over the windows, and glass windows throughout this development. Parking for this building is buffered from views through evergreens and landscaping. The total required parking for this development (there is a shared parking agreement for all of the buildings) and the total should be 247 and this entire development is proposing 278 parking spaces. Signage is proposed to include two wall-mounted signs facing northwest and southeast. Signage is in compliance with the ordinance. They do need to apply for a building permit but these are individual letters, backlit. There is one monument sign proposed along the northwest corner of the site and it may not exceed 24 square feet. Trails and sidewalks are intended to allow for connection between the subject site and the surrounding area and it will separate pedestrian from vehicular traffic. The landscaping plan is in compliance with ordinance. The shrubs along the east side of the site will fully screen the parking lot as well as the garage doors on this side. The applicant is proposing to Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 2 have a bench at the entrance in the southeast corner of the building. Lighting plan is in compliance with ordinance. What you see along the right side of the screen is existing light fixtures. What the applicant is proposing is very compatible with this development. This development was permitted a maximum number of 71,500 square feet of total building area. With this building the total number is going add up to 67,271 square feet. As I mentioned earlier, the current standards for the planned unit development do not list auto repair shops as a permitted use. Staff has prepared ordinances that regulate the automotive repair shop. The site plan cannot be approved without approval of this planned unit development amendment. We are recommending approval of the application with conditions. I’ll be happy to answer any questions. Weick: Thank you, Sharmeen. Very thorough as was the staff report. At this time I would open it up for commission questions. You can go ahead and just speak up if you have them. McGonagill: Sharmeen, the question I have go back to the site plan. Walk me through, I have two areas of curiosity. One is how the effluent will be handled inside the bays. What are they doing to wash down the bays, clean up, because there is oil and stuff leaking every day? How will that be handled inside the facility itself environmentally? Does it go to our stormwater? Does it go to sewage? Where is it going? The second one is out in the parking lot, the slope of the parking lot. Which way does it go? For example, if someone brings in a car and its leaking oil as they do and they are bringing it there for maintenance in rain, snow, whatever, which way will it go? Will it go to the stormwater pond that you have there? I’m just curious about that. To keep the contamination as I would call it on that site? Aanenson: Sharmeen, do you want to let the applicant answer that question? If that’s all right, Commissioner McGonagill? Al-Jaff: Sure. McGonagill: Sure, that’s fine. Or we can wait until the applicant presents. Aanenson: I think they are probably more technically… McGonagill: We can do that. What about the overall site grade? Do you know that? Henricksen: Sharmeen, I can butt in here if you guys can hear me. This is Erik Henricksen. I’m with the Engineering Department. I’m the Project Engineer. I did review of these plans. To kind of go back to your previous question, if I recall in the plans, and I would leave this up to Kimley- Horn too, but I believe they have a coalescing oil water separator. It’s a system that is pretreatment prior to discharge into the sanitary sewer system. I believe I did see that on the site plan. As far as slopes or grades it is relatively a flat lot. When the PUD was built out as mass graded, this lot was a part of that mass grading so it is relatively flat. As far as the parking lot itself, it does grade and drainage does go to the storm that’s going to be collected there so it Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 3 would be routed to catch basins in the parking lot. As far as the issue when cars are leaking in a repair area there is really no pretreatment on the storm that it goes directly to but the main focus again is how you deal with the pits and the drainage inside, which again is that pretreatment. It did appear adequate from our review. Again, I think Kimley-Horn knows more about the ins and outs of the, or the minutiae of that part. McGonagill: Thank you. That’s what I was expecting was some sort of a water coalescer. Usually that’s what you will see. Thanks. Wakefield: This is Jonathan Wakefield. I’m the property procurement director for Christian Bros. Automotive. I’m more than happy to answer the first part of the question regarding how we handle the internal cleanliness of the shop. We are not a wash-down shop at all. Modern EPA standards wouldn’t allow that and we’ve been compliant since we started operating in 1982. The way that we operate we have a Zamboni-style machine. It looks like something you would see on a small-scale hockey rink. It is a daily clean and scrub of the particulate matter that drops from the cars. That includes snow melt, so on and so forth. There are trench drains within the shop to take snow melt, rain, and so forth. That’s carried to the 750 gallon sand and oil separator that the Engineering folks alluded to earlier. I can go into a deep dive of our environmental compliance but we literally have a three-level containment system that more than exceeds state and federal containment requirements. Again, if you want me to go deeper into detail I certainly can, but we are as above and beyond as can possibly be imagined. McGonagill: Thank you. That’s all I have. Weick: Thank you. Great. Other questions from the commission or clarifying points? Von Oven: This is Commissioner Von Oven. On the staff report pages 13 and 14 is where you’ve got the PUD amendment and there you indicated staff had some concerns. In the bullet points below that, two bullet points I wanted to call out and just understand if they are somehow related or if they are not at all related. Bullet 2: All repair, assembly, disassembly… shall occur within a closed building. The second to the last bullet point is all service garage doors shall be screened. Is a garage door with a screen on it considered a closed building? Al-Jaff: No. The screening of the garage door is through landscape purposes. Von Oven: So we’re not talking about screens that allow noise through. We are talking about like blackout? Al-Jaff: No. Visual screen. Weick: Like the trees. Al-Jaff: So the trees along this… Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 4 Von Oven: Thank you. No further questions. Al-Jaff: Thank you. Aanenson: If I may, Chairman, I think that was one of the things that we contemplated when we looked at the orientation of the building for noise. This is adjacent to kind of the frontage road adjacent to 212 and so looking at that orientation the bays internally, but then that screening, the landscaping screening provides an additional visual impact and the noise attenuation. So that’s, it was kind of a twofold thing. We’ve had other auto repairs that there was conditions put on that the doors had to down the whole time. That is really onerous. For one, staff to try and enforce, and then seasonal times of the year that there may be some ambient noise. We have confidence that the way this operation is going to go that it would fit in. Again, we know there’s a demand fr this type of service in the community, and this seems like a good site. Kind of a transition when you are behind the existing gas station with that Kwik Trip and working on that orientation. Weick: Thanks, Kate. Reeder: I’m Mr. Reeder. Does what we’re doing here is a repair business and not a collision repair business? Does our ordinance distinguish between those? Al-Jaff: Yes, it does. What you have here is basically the equivalent of changing tires, oil. It’s not a body shop. It is actually engines and the running of… Reeder: So you would not expect to have a car that’s missing a front end or a … or whatever sitting in this parking lot? Al-Jaff: Well it depends on what type of damage has… Aanenson: Let’s let the applicant answer that. Wakefield: Again, this is Jonathan Wakefield. We don’t do anything to the exterior of a vehicle at all whatsoever. We don’t even do touch-up paint to a bumper. No window replacement. None of that. We are strictly internal and with a modern vehicle, a very high percentage of the work that we do is electronic and electronic diagnostic. Most vehicles have 32 on-board computers and/or sensors and that’s the vast majority of what you fix anymore. The mechanical aspect is still very important but our technicians are really accomplished at working with both a wrench and a laptop. So, all the work happens within the bays and happens to vehicles that, they are not there to have any kind of body work at all whatsoever, they’re just there to be repaired and put back on the road. Does that answer your question? Reeder: It does for you. My question for staff is whether or not the subsequent owner of this building would be restricted to that kind of repair? Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 5 Al-Jaff: Yes, they would be. Reeder: How? Al-Jaff: The city code defines auto repair shops and differentiates it from body shops. What the applicant is requesting is an auto repair shop, not a body shop. Reeder: So if somebody wanted to put a body shop in this building, they would have to go through an amendment to the PUD? Al-Jaff: That is correct. Reeder: In this current proposal are there any regulations on how many cars they can have sitting in their lot waiting for repair? Al-Jaff: No, there isn’t. There’s a limit on the number of parking spaces, there’s a limit on the square footage and how many bays there are so I’m assuming that if they reach capacity as far as vehicles that need to be fixed, they just will let their clients know that their appointment would have to wait to a later date or time. Wakefield: If I may I can elaborate on that as well. So there’s also is a stipulation in the restrictions that we have accepted with staff and those restrictions require that any vehicles that are in our parking lot, especially for overnight, must be operable. In other words, they can drive under their own power. If they can’t, they are in the bays overnight. They also have to be licensed. That keeps derelict vehicles from staying for extended periods of time. We don’t want that. A, it’s a bad look. This is a high-end neighborhood. We want to look like our neighbors and be attractive to them. That’s Item 1 and the other, somewhat self-serving here, when the cars leave, that’s usually when we get paid. So there is no incentive for a vehicle to stay long term, overnight occasionally as maybe somebody has to work late and they can’t pick up their vehicle until the next morning and so it forces a courtesy. The first nine vehicles we have go in the bays overnight, and if there happen to be some stragglers, we’ll put them in a lighted part of the parking lot and they will be picked up or worked on the next day. Aanenson: Chairman, if I may? Weick: Yes. Aanenson: That’s condition number 9 of the PUD and that’s what regulates it and that’s what Ms. Al-Jaff was talking about. We do differentiate it in the code but it is further spelled out in the PUD ordinance what was specific to this zoning district. Weick: Thank you. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 6 Reeder: Mr. Chairman, I’m not sure if I heard all of that but everything he says sounds super to me. Is that our requirement or the decision of the company that’s coming into this building at this time? Aanenson: It’s our requirement in the PUD. It says no vehicles that are inoperable can be parked there and that also they have to be licensed. That’s pretty much universal throughout the zoning district in the city. All other places that would do repairs. Reeder: Super. Weick: Great questions. Do you have more, Commissioner Reeder? Reeder: I think I’m good. I’m just looking for the trash receptacle. I assume it’s on the end of the building, is that correct? Al-Jaff: That is correct. It is along the north, right here. Weick: Which is towards Kwik Trip I think, right? Reeder: Super. Thank you. Al-Jaff: Northeast. Weick: Great. Other commissioners with questions? Hearing none, I would ask the applicant to rejoin us and if there is something to add. I know we’ve heard from you a couple of times already and we certainly appreciate that. That is very helpful. But we’d give you an opportunity to speak about the project and the neighborhood if you would like. Wakefield: Absolutely. So again, my name is Jonathan Wakefield. I’m the Property Procurement Director for Christian Bros. Automotive. I also have representation from Kimley-Horn. Christian was kind enough to give up an evening to back me up if you ask anything too terribly technical. Our Chief Development Officer is also on the call so you’ve got a Director and a CDO. That hasn’t happened before and hopefully that speaks to how important this project is to us and how taking root in your community is something that we dearly want to have happen. Also, a representative from the current owner of the property is here. We are in the process of buying it, developing it, and it is our goal to bring it to fruition. In looking at the history of this site, the lot that we are occupying was original designed for a bank. There are some things about Christian Bros. Automotive that I want to get into; some advantages that may not be too apparent. One of them is that our traffic count is extraordinarily low. As compared to a bank, we will reduce the traffic that it would have generated by 60-80%. So, at worst 60%. At best, 80%. The McDonald’s that’s already there and operating, we do less business by volume from a traffic standpoint all day than they do in 30 minutes. It’s stunning. There’s a value add in having a very low traffic generator. That’s really speaking to the transactional side of Christian Bros. coming in Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 7 and becoming part of this development. From a noise standpoint, that wasn’t brought up here in this particular forum, but it was brought up by staff. It was a detracting letter that was sent in an email. Somebody gave their voice and had a concern I wanted to address that as well. As staff alluded to our building orientation places the bays facing inboard and away from the street. The only people who might hear anything out of us might be the Kwik Trip, at worst. We’ve done two acoustic studies in other locales for other municipalities and we know, without any shadow of a doubt, that by the time the sound reaches our property line and crosses into somebody else, our loudest noise, which is the air hammer which takes the nuts off of a tire, is 74 decibels at the door and is attenuated out to somewhere between 40 and 50 decibels at the street. For reference, my speaking voice, I’m told, is somewhere between 50 and 55 decibels. I can talk all day as my staff will tell you, but we’re not running an air hammer all day. We work on about 17 cars a day, and that’s it. We are a true repair shop. We are not a tire and lube shop. That’s not our bit. We don’t need 200 cars a day to come through to have a viable business. That’s not what we’re there for. We see some real advantages. There was a line in the staff report that I really enjoyed and it was talking about neighborhood commercial uses: “Those uses that meet the daily needs of the residents.” That’s exactly what we do. A gas station does that. Having a childcare facility there does that. Across the street, although not part of this development necessarily, the Park and Ride does that. McDonald’s does that. Businesses that may or may not be liked in what they do but have a strong and positive impact on the community in the way that they serve it. Christian Bros. Automotive certainly does that. There were some environmental questions. I think I answered those. Lighting has been talked about. Again, that’s the transactional part of our presentation but I also want to move into the relational aspect of Christian Bros. and who we are and why we do what we do. We’ve been in operation since 1982. We have over 230 stores across the nation approaching 30 states. We may have 30 states. I’ve actually lost count in the 10 years I’ve been with the company. This is not our first rodeo by any stretch of the imagination and it’s not our first store in this particular area or your state. We are also in places you may have heard of: Maple Grove where incidentally we are part of, we are actually in their parking lot, for Parnassus Preparatory Charter School, so we play very well with others, even educational facilities like Primrose who is directly adjacent to us. Also in the Maple Grove facility, there is a Tender Time childcare facility as well and our Lakeville location we are one lot over from a KinderCare and actually we are directly adjacent to a KinderCare in Clive, Iowa. We’ve got another location coming up in Inver Grove. Two more in development: one in Woodbury and one in Savage. Actually a couple more that are too early to talk about. I say all that to say this: We are a highly professional company. Extremely reputable. Incredibly clean. I would challenge anyone and we offered this to staff as well, at least I told Christian to offer it to staff. Feel free to drive and look at any of our other facilities, the way they are operated, way we handle cars, the way we treat our customers, the shuttle vehicles that we have and then we take them to work and back, which helps reduce the car count. We are excited about the Park and Ride, that somebody could conceivably drop their vehicle off and before they hop on that mass transit vehicle, drop it off with us. We will fix your care while you are at work and come pick you up at the parking lot and take care of you. That’s a service that very few can offer. Again, I can’t stress enough how deeply embedded we are in the communities that we serve and service. We don’t look at our customers as customers or clients. They are friends. I know that sounds a little bit salesy but we Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 8 are a faith-based company and we are very proud of that and we feel that if we’re allowed to be a part of this community, a part of this development, we will have a lasting impact. I don’t know if I said it or not but since 1982 we have not closed a single location. Our business model is sound. Automotive repair is an essential business and during this time of COVID where we are all coping and doing strange things like having meetings in your home office, we have continued to shine. We had one down month and then it picked up immediately. Actually, the month after our down month was the best month we’ve ever had. We’re survivors and we’ll do well here and are very much looking forward to being part of what you already have and possess here: a great community. Again, I’m open for any questions. I’ve been with Christian Bros. for 10 years. There’s not a whole lot that hasn’t been thrown at me before and I can take it. Weick: Well, thank you very much. It’s a great presentation. You answered quite a few questions of mine. In that presentation, and I will certainly turn it over to our commission members if there are any clarifying questions they need to ask you or your team. We’ll give everyone a second to gather their thoughts if they would like. Wakefield: This is usually the part where I say I’ve flown in from Houston, Texas and my time is your time, but obviously we are not doing that right now. So I’m actually going to get to have dinner after this with my family so that’s kind of cool. Weick: That is a good side of it, yes. Wakefield: Anything you’ve got. We’re an open book. Very transparent. Weick: Are you working on something over there, Commissioner McGonagill? Okay. I wasn’t sure if you were turning or not. Okay. McGonagill: I’m good. Weick: I can see you. I can’t see everybody else. It doesn’t sound like, it sounds like you’ve touch on everything and you’ve certainly answered a few questions, throughout the staff presentation as well, so thank you very much. I appreciate the detail you provided and it certainly left our Commission members speechless so it must have been thorough. I will now open the public hearing portion of this matter. I will say that we did receive a couple of emails, or at least two and those are in the record. I think one was in favor and one was opposed to the building of the item. Al-Jaff: Correct. Staff has received phone calls. Weick: Okay. Al-Jaff: Mainly inquiries about what is the development and we just were able to answer all of their questions and ensure that if they had any comments or any concerns to let us know. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 9 Weick: Okay. Great. Anyone here present this evening who would like to come forward and speak an opinion on this item may do so at this time. Just please state your name and talk as loud as you can because the microphone is covered with plastic. Thank you for coming this evening. Chintaginjala: Good evening. May name is Bala Chintaginjala. My address is 8982 Southwest Village Loop. That is a townhome. From my home this proposed project is 800 feet away. By the way, I spoke to Sharmeen earlier today about this project. She tried to explain. Actually, I went through this project last weekend. It was very good. I am also a civil engineer. I worked for 10 years in the construction field but for the last 20 years I’ve been working in IT. I want to thank the applicant for investing in our city. He created jobs and also he will fulfill the needs of neighborhood residents. My request is, as long as we can keep the noise levels low as for the allowable limits, as for the core, and pollution is under control as for the limits. I don’t have any problem. I welcome this project and I want to vote yes for this project. Thank you very much. Gentlemen, thank you. Excellent job. Weick: Thank you so much and thank you for coming this evening and offering your views on this project. Very important. Anyone else present who would like to come forward on this item? We also have the call-in number on the screen. Is it lighting up over there? Al-Jaff: Nothing is happening. Weick: All right. So I mentioned the emails have been noted and are in the record and thank you this evening for speaking. Your opinion on the item as well. We’re just checking the phones. We’re just making sure anyone who wants to call in, can. I know it’s weird. We’ve done this a couple of times but it still is a challenge to get used to the new way of doing things but we will perfect it, I’m sure. With that, I will close the public hearing portion of this item. We’ve heard from staff, our applicant, as well as members of the community in person and via email, and telephone calls earlier. So thank you to everyone who has expressed their views and opinions on this item. At this time the item is open for the Planning Commission to discuss the item amongst ourselves, voice any opinion, concerns, and certainly would be open to a motion and a second as appropriate. Yes, Commissioner Skistad. Skistad: I am Commissioner Skistad and I appreciate all the work that went into this proposal and I’m excited about having it. I do think it’s something we need for the community and it’s very well done and very well thought out. The building is beautiful, so this would be something that I would definitely support. I appreciate all of the parties that worked so hard on this project. Weick: Awesome. Thank you. I concur. Some things that were touched on that I had written down. Certainly people had mentioned noise a lot and one thing that I had sort of, I know Commissioner Reeder had mentioned it, is it like, could it be a body shop and it’s not like that. My big question was, is it like one of those quick-change oil places where you got like you mentioned. They make money by turning cars. Turn and burn. Turn and burn and that’s where I Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 10 think you can start to get into unsightly potentially traffic patterns, noise patterns. They’re not as concerned with limiting those things, right? They need to get in and out. That’s clearly not what’s going on here and so I think that’s great. In fact, having seen that area and, I don’t think it’s the number one probably noise unsightly or detractor, if you will, in that area. That Kwik Trip is packed and like there’s cars everywhere, and people pumping gas and going in and out of the store and running through the car wash. All this stuff. I just think it’s a good use of the land and I think it will be a, I honestly believe it will be a good neighbor for the area. McGonagill: Mr. Chairman, I would agree with you and I think the thing that I think about with their affect is true. I mean a third of the price of your car these days is electronics. Weick: Right. McGonagill: And you’re not, everybody guarantees their drive trains for 100,000 miles but the electronics are the ones you’re working on so I think it’s good. I appreciate the way they thought it out. I do also appreciate staff’s conditions that you put in there on the fact of it has to be drivable, things like that have to be kept sitting out there and there are some conditions to try and keep it up as nice as possible and I think it would be a good add. These kind of facilities, if you think about it, it will probably hire 12-15 people that will be good, permanent jobs by the time you go through it all, not counting the suppliers, not counting anything else that goes through there. It’s a nice extension so I’m in favor of it, Mr. Chairman. Weick: Awesome. We would certainly entertain a motion if there weren’t… Reeder: Mr. Chairman? I’m prepared to make that motion. I think it’s a good project in a good place. I’m pleased with the operation suggestions that they have so I would make the motion. Reeder moved, Noyes seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Site Plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop and Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen Gateway allowing automotive repair shops with standards, Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated received October 30, 2020, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to conditions. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. Weick: The motion passes unanimously 7-0. Again, thank you for all your hard work Sharmeen. I know this has been a long one and detailed and it’s very important any time we are amending PUD and adding a new neighbor. We want to make sure that its right for the neighborhood and this feels like a good one. Thank you for your hard work. Thank you to representatives from Christian Bros. as well. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 11 Aanenson: I would just like to make a reminder Chairman that this item does go to the City Council so for anybody that’s following along, that will be scheduled for the December 14th City Council meeting for final action. Weick: Thank you and thank you for coming and speaking this evening as well. Appreciate that. We do have a couple other items on the agenda this evening. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 12 PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1601 LAKE LUCY ROAD FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-RESIDENTIAL (LOW DENSITY). Weick: With that I will turn it over to Sharmeen. Thank you, Sharmeen. Al-Jaff: Chairman and members of the Planning Commission, the application before you is a request to rezone from rural residential to planned unit development. Briefly, the site is located south of Lake Lucy Road. It is surrounded by Lake Lucy in its entirety. The site has an area of approximately 9.03 acres. It is currently zoned rural residential. Access to the site is gained via Lake Lucy Road. The 2040 Land Use Plan guides the subject site for low density residential. Within a low density you can have 1.2 units per acre but no more than 4 units per acres. This category can be either zoned into single-family residential, R-4 which is a mix of low density, residential low and medium density, or planned unit development-residential. Rezoning this property into any of those categories would allow the site to be consistent with the 2040 Land Use Plan. Brief background. Back in 1993 the owners of the island at the time came in for a wetland alteration permit for the purpose of constructing a bridge and a driveway to access the driveway. There were multiple extensions granted to this. The work was completed on the bridge as well as the driveway in 1999. Some of the things that have taken place that we also need to point out is that since 2018 staff has been working with the applicant very closely. This site is truly unique. It is the only island that has building rights within the City of Chanhassen. The applicant’s goal is to build a single-family home for their family and an accessory dwelling unit for his mother. The site contains bluffs and wetlands. It is located within the shoreland overlay district of Lake Lucy and it has 100% tree canopy cover. The access driveway off of Lake Lucy Road connects the island to Lake Lucy Road via a bridge. The length of this driveway is approximately 1,600 feet and this is just the distance between Lake Lucy Road and the bridge right here. Looking at the different options, we know that this is a lot of record, it is entitled to the building of a single-family home. The applicant’s request was to have a principle structure with an accessory dwelling unit. This can either be achieved via subdivision or rezoning the site to planned unit development. We looked at the impact of subdividing the site versus rezoning it to planned unit development. With a subdivision, you will be able to accomplish the additional home; however, you will have to widen the driveway to 20 feet. There is additional grading, tree removal, hard surface, potential for two additional home sites rather than the two that the applicant is requesting. Also, there is more potential for grading with the extension of public utilities. Through a planned unit development, the applicant would be able to use the existing driveway. There is a septic system that is proposed on the site as well as a well. We are able through the planned unit development regulations to cap the size of the accessory dwelling unit. We can require the use of a single internal driveway and the planned unit development governing the site would establish additional limitations on the site. The applicant selected to move forward with a planned unit development approach. With that, staff directed the applicant to put together a concept, bring it before the city to allow us to evaluate the request, and bring it before you. It is important that we point out this is a concept. It was intended to give us an idea of what it is the Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 13 owner of the property’s intentions were and how to write proper ordinances that address concerns, improve potential development of the site, add regulations and improve the quality of development. Some of the things that we’re able to accomplish is that the total permitted site coverage is 20%. What the applicant is proposing is going to be below 15%, 14.5% with this concept. We sent this concept to multiple agencies including the watershed, the DNR, and staff at the city, and there was one reoccurring theme that was pointed out by the different agencies and different staff members and that had to do with the amount of grading and what can be done to reduce the grading. So we had a discussion with the property owner and the initial proposal basically looked at serving the main home via one driveway. At the southern portion of the island the driveway would split to serve the accessory dwelling unit. We recommended that the applicant unify those driveways and share access, basically eliminating everything that you see in the hatched red and the applicant can talk about that further but he did agree to this request and understood that this was a concern to many different departments and different staff members. What some of the other elements that this planned unit development will regulate is the fact that you can have one single-family home and one accessory dwelling unit. The ownership of those two homes; they cannot be sold separately. These will remain under single ownership. There is no short-term lease and with short term we are defining it as less than three months. We are limiting the size of the accessory dwelling unit. There are measures in place to ensure fire prevention. We are requesting that the driveways be combined. The applicant was directed to continue working with staff to promote preservation of natural features of the site. We are limiting the size of the accessory structures which also include water-oriented structures for the island. We are also regulating dock rights within this development. Staff is recommending approval of this application of this request because I had mentioned earlier, yes it can be subdivided but this is a mechanism for the city to regulate the future development of this site. This is the type of development when basically a one-size-fits-all ordinance was difficult to implement on a parcel such as this one. We are recommending approval with comments in the staff report and as an adoption of the attached ordinance. One thing I do need to point out is that staff received three emails in addition to the emails included in your staff report. They were from Gregory Fast, Kathryn Randall (also goes by Betsy), and Kim and Tom McReavy. The emails basically included comments requesting minimizing grading, concerns with potential light pollution on the island, impact to surrounding habitat. Other comments involved support of the project, commending the applicant for removing buckthorn from the island. With that, we will make sure that these are incorporated as part of the public record when this items appears before the city council. I’ll be happy to answer any questions. Weick: Great. Thank you. I will open it up for commissioners to ask questions. McGonagill: I have the same questions I had before on the previous item and it’s about fire. They’re going to have a well and other fire suppression sprinklers inside the structures? Al-Jaff: Correct. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 14 McGonagill: So there’s not a hydrant or anything down there? There’s no sewage down there? They have their own septic system? Al-Jaff: Correct. And there was a rather lengthy meeting that took place between the fire chief and the applicant. They walked the site and they agreed upon a consultant that specializes in fire suppression. The applicant would be able to speak to this matter further. McGonagill: In the conversations with the fire chief is it his intention, as I just sit here looking at the bridge, will the bridge take a fire truck? Al-Jaff: Yes, actually it would. McGonagill: So they could get equipment down there. Al-Jaff: Correct. So what we are waiting for is official certification that the bridge will be able to handle the truck. Preliminary investigations tell us that yes, it will be able to handle it. McGonagill: Under the conditions of the PUD can you put in a requirement that the bridge always be able to handle a truck? Bridges age. To meet that. I don’t know if there is a code for that but I just want the ability to get an ambulance down there. At least to get one small piece of equipment in there. If there was an emergency, that’s whose going to respond and I don’t want to see the fire truck go blasting down through there no knowing if the bridge won’t take it and it ends up in the lake. Aanenson: I’m not sure you mentioned this Sharmeen but the house will be fire sprinkled. McGonagill: Yes, she said that. But they respond. Like a 9-1-1 call, somebody calls and has a heart attack or something and the fire guys, they respond. What I’m looking for is can in the PUD you put requirements similar to commercial bridges. That it’s maintained at a certain standard to allow fire equipment access. Al-Jaff: Specifically from a safety standpoint and emergency management, that will be the intent. Staff will check with the city attorney to ensure that…It is staff’s intent to ensure that this requirement is part of the planned unit development. We will check with legal counsel. McGonagill: The second question is similar to that. Is access for other commercial vehicles, garbage trucks, etc., they will have the same? Aanenson: Can I just clarify that, too? I think oftentimes in situations like that you have to bring your garbage up to the street. That’s actually a private driveway so typically you take your trash up to the end of the driveway, but we can clarify that. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 15 McGonagill: Okay. Very good. Because it’s, I just think about natural activities, landscaping, and construction. People are going to always be doing something down there. There’s going to be a weight requirement on that bridge? Aanenson: Yes, when they are constructing the house for sure. McGonagill: For sure and then as you go down the road it will be there too. I just want to ensure that it’s maintained safely. I realize it’s a private drive. It’s not our responsibility. But with a PUD it is. I mean we could put that in the PUD if that’s the way we want it to be done and just ensure that it’s safe. Okay. That’s all the questions I have. Weick: Great. Thank you. Other questions? Noyes: I have a little bit of a follow up question to kind of the previous one and it’s related to that private road and the maintenance of it. I would imagine the property owner is responsible for the plowing of that road in the winter? The plowing of the snow? Are there any restrictions related to use of road chemicals on that road given that this is a bridge over a lake. Al-Jaff: So back in 1993 when the wetland alteration permit was approved for the construction of the driveway one of the conditions was limiting chemicals used on the driveway. Noyes: Thank you. Skistad: I’m going to assume that flooding is not really an issue. It is an issue? Al-Jaff: It is…the island sits over 30 feet above the ordinary high water mark of Lake Lucy so it’s fine. It will be okay. Skistad: Okay. The other question I had was the accessory dwelling unit. It says it has a maximum of two bedrooms and it may not exceed 1600 square feet. I’m just wondering why we are limiting it to two bedrooms because like a typical apartment would be 1200 to 1300 square feet for a three-bedroom and this would be 1600 so it seems like…I was just curious about that. Why we would be limiting it specifically to two bedrooms with 1600 feet? Al-Jaff: So the 1600 feet was requested by the applicant. Number of bedrooms within the structure, a couple of things came into play. The first one was the capacity of the septic system that is proposed out there. This site will take in the sewage from the main house as well as the accessory dwelling unit. The intent is to provide a place for mom to live as well as a potential caregiver. So these are the two reasons why we limited the number of bedrooms, directly relating to the septic system that’s going to serve this site. Also, we needed to ensure that this was not a full-fledged detached single-family home but rather truly an accessory dwelling unit and it was reasonable to limit the size. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 16 Skistad: Thank you. McGonagill: Follow up on Commissioner Skistad’s septic system question, has any sort of percolating test been done on the island to know if the septic system will work out there? Aanenson: Just a second. Can you make sure you are speaking into your microphone? McGonagill: Sure. I’m sorry. I’ll just repeat the question. Follow up on Commissioner Skistad’s question on the septic system. Has any sort of percolating test been done on the island to give a high degree of certainty that a septic system will work and not effluent go into the lake? Aanenson: The Building Official looked at that, just cursory soil types, and they believe there is a couple different types of systems but they are confident that one of those would work. McGonagill: Okay. Thank you. Von Oven: We’ve been very specific about this accessory dwelling unit so as not to make it a sellable total home. I guess, given my unfamiliarity with those things, is there anything about an accessory dwelling unit that makes it less safe than the requirements on a normal single-family home? Aanenson: No. It would still have to go through the building permit process. Be inspected like a regular one. Again, the goal was, there’s no limit to the square footage of a home so you can have one large home. In this circumstance they have identified a home and want to have an ancillary one instead of saying you are going to get two lots. We want to cap those so it doesn’t become two separate lots as Ms. Al-Jaff indicated. But it has to go through the same rigorous. It would have to meet as Sharmeen indicated there would have to be sewer and water which would be through the well and septic and in addition, all of the building codes. Von Oven: I understand that it was the request of the applicant to make that accessory dwelling unit a maximum of 1600 feet. I’m still confused on the max of two bedrooms. Sharmeen, I know you said part of the reason for this was to ensure that it doesn’t turn into a single-family home. Given that that’s covered in other areas, I’m going to make the assumption that the actual single- family home to be built can has as many bedrooms as it wants, right? Al-Jaff: That’s correct. As long as the number of bedrooms can be served via public or private utilities. Von Oven: Okay. I guess then my question ends up being this: Between these two structures, is there a maximum number of bedrooms that the proposed sewage system will be able to handle, and is that governed through some sort of inspection process? Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 17 Aanenson: Correct. It is. They have to demonstrate that and it’s actually based on bedroom space to your septic and well. Let’s just go back to the two separate dwellings again. If you have enough to make it two complete homes then you have different traffic patterns, different use of the property. So when it’s intended to be ancillary and regulated by the homeowner, it’s a different feel than two separate homes with cars coming and going, two sets of trash being hauled up to the end of the driveway, that sort of thing. We are looking, it says one structure with something ancillary that is related to that principal structure. Von Oven: Thank you. Skistad: I guess I’m just going to ask a future question then. So if, let’s say that someone in the future, a new person has purchased the property. Perhaps they will probably have to install a new septic system so they won’t be able to increase the bedroom. The land won’t be able to have a three-bedroom instead of a two-bedroom unit unless they come back to us and ask for a variance? Aanenson: Yes. Or amend the PUD. Typically, if you add additional bedrooms, you have to demonstrate that you have sewer capacity. Could they oversize it to begin with? That’s potential. I’m not sure. That is something that would have to be looked at at the time when they are putting together the system. Any changes to the plan as laid out would have to come back. Any modifications, which would have to come back as a PUD amendment. That’s why the PUD was put together. To regulate all that’s being used. Skistad: I understand what you are doing. I understand what you are saying, but let’s say that they have an office and it just naturally becomes a bedroom at some point. I don’t know if there is a better way to write that. Because the goal is to just make sure obviously that we don’t overcome the sewage capacity because we don’t obviously want to spill anything into Lake Lucy. Weick: There is a septic field sizing attachment which is really long actually. They specify, and there’s two different options. They specify seven bedrooms and then they sort of explain how they can. It really comes down to the bedrooms. They explain how they can appropriately fit one or two mounds or septic systems to support the seven bedrooms where they can build one for the main house and one for the accessory structure. But there’s only so much space to be able to have the runout fields and all that kind of stuff. I think what they are saying is it sounds like they want that primary structure to be five bedrooms and honestly, I think all that’s left is just size. Aanenson: Capacity. Weick: Thank you. That’s a better word. Capacity. Is two bedroom. I think they are fully limited by septic and nothing else. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 18 Aanenson: So if one of the bedrooms in the accessory building was being used as an office, that’s fine. It wouldn’t affect. Weick: Right. Skistad: Okay. Weick: Great. These are great questions. It’s awesome. It’s really important. Reeder: Under normal regulations, is it possible for this accessory dwelling unit to be rented out or would that be illegal? How would be control that? Al-Jaff: They can rent it out but it cannot be a short-term lease. It has to be three months or more. Reeder: So we essentially have two residences on one lot? Al-Jaff: Correct. Which is permitted under a planned unit development. Aanenson: It was proposed, it was originally intended to be an accessory structure for a grandparent. Could it be used for something else? We always as planners try to anticipate something in the future. So if you’re doing a weekly rental, you have a different capacity whether there is two bedrooms. How it’s being used is different that someone who might rent it for the summer or something like that. That’s how we looked at that it. Looking at having a three-month as opposed to renting it out by the week. Reeder: So there’s no requirement that the accessory building, the person that lives in that building, be related to the main building? It can be anybody? It seems like we had one of these accessory buildings I think about two years ago that we approved and I can’t remember what the requirements were. Aanenson: Right now we have a variance requirement that you can finish your basement off and have someone living with you but that has to be related to you. It’s a different requirement. It is certainly a requirement that you could put on this property. That’s certainly under the PUD. You could say that the person living there has to be related. That’s an option. We gave a different option. Reeder: What is the intent of the proposed property owner? Aanenson: I would have to ask the applicant to speak to that. Skistad: I’m just going to look at this from a lease perspective again. I’m just going to assume that, let’s just say it sold and they want to lease this secondary area. I’m going to assume that you Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 19 could do a typical lease which runs 12 months and then possibly it turns into a month-to-month lease but that wouldn’t cause any problems here because they would have met the minimum. Aanenson: Yes. Skistad: Okay. Weick: Great. More thoughts or questions on this one for Sharmeen? Just holler if I’m rushing you as commission members. If you need some more time to read or think, just holler at me. I don’t want to push anybody. Von Oven: Hey, Commissioner Weick! Weick: Yes. Von Oven: I’m hollering at you. I’ve been sitting here trying to figure out how to ask this question so it’s not going to come out right. At the very beginning, Commissioner McGonagill talked about the bridge and it was very clear to me that an existing bullet, there is not an existing bullet in the PUD that says, “Hey, this bridge has to be safe.” So I think my question is more procedural. For us as a Planning Commission tonight, moving forward with this. If there are those of us who would like to see a bullet point in that PUD, is that be an amendment possibly? Is that a motion? Is that something that can be done after the fact? How does that work? Aanenson: I would recommend that you make it, if someone wanted that in the conditions, that you make that an amendment to the motion, that that be added. Von Oven: Okay. McGonagill: Following up to his question procedurally, does that happen after the first motion or can you make an amendment before then? Aanenson: You can make it as part of your original motion. Weick: As part of the motion. Aanenson: So what we’re checking on is the legality. It is a lot of record so they could build on that lot without going through this process and you would have the same jurisdiction. But we’ll follow up on that and have that answer if you want to amend that motion and get that clarified when it goes up to city council. McGonagill: Very good. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 20 Von Oven: Got it. Okay, sorry. I’m going to repeat what you just said to make sure I understood it. If the applicant was just going to build a single-family home, they could just do that in its current state? Aanenson: Yes. Von Oven: The reason why our concerns about the bridge holding an ambulance could be met is because they are asking for this variance. I’m sorry, this rezoning, in which case we have the ability to amend what is being proposed right now as the PUD? Aanenson: That is correct. Von Oven: I think I’m getting this thing down. Thank you. Weick: You’re killing it. But a motion is premature at this point because we have not heard from the applicant or the public hearing. So unless there are other… I will move at this point to, and we certainly have an opportunity to follow up with staff as questions come up. I would invite the applicant if they are on the Zoom call to make any comments or a presentation. Wicka: I am and thank you very much. Weick: Welcome! Wicka: Thank you. And thank you to all the members of the Planning Commission for considering this rezoning request. My name is John Wicka. I live at 2547 Bridle Creek Trail in Chanhassen with my wife and five daughters. We’ve been, I don’t know if this qualifies, in Chanhassen as long-time residents but we’ve been here is this house for 17 years. At least we’re not newcomers. I thank you for the opportunity to speak to you all and offer you a little additional information and commentary for your consideration as you consider this rezoning request. The first time my wife and I experienced the island was in June of 2018, just over two years ago and it was just recently put up for sale by Al and Mary Weingart who live on the adjacent property and still do. It was their dream to build a home out on the island. They’re the ones that oversaw the building of the bridge so I’ll come back around and talk more about that and I will be happy to answer any questions pertaining to the bridge. I understand there is a lot of concern in and around that. When we first experienced the island in June of 2018 I think our first reaction was I guess we couldn’t believe it was available. It’s sizeable. It has some acreage to it. It’s unique. It’s an island but it’s even better than an island. It’s an island with a pre-existing, very capable bridge that is intended to support fire trucks and construction trucks and so forth. It was really an ideal find for us. If you’ve had a chance to consider the topography map there, the top graphic map, it’s very interesting topography. It’s flat around many of the edges but it has this elevation in the center of the island and there are bluffs there. There are bluff setbacks there. There are wetland setbacks so there is a lot of dynamic things happening on the island but it is indisputably breathtakingly beautiful. We were excited about the opportunity because of the size Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 21 of the property and it had been our desire for several years to build a home for my mother who is now 86 years old near us. My dad died 21 years ago so this has been kind of something that we’ve been thinking of considering and planning for some time now. My mother is fiercely independent but she is 86 years old. She now really relishes or welcomes or is excited about the opportunity to maintain her independence but still have us just a moment’s notice away. So this was one of the big motivations for us to purchase the island because we thought it gave us the elbow room, if you will, to build a separate structure for her. Just two months later we purchased the island and at that time the first order of business was to eradicate the buckthorn. I think about it as kind of freeing the island because the buckthorn had a choke hold on the island. I think it was a neighbor’s comment that Sharmeen referenced a few moments ago that they were glad that we took out the buckthorn. I worked with Jill Sinclair. Walked the island with her over two years ago. She made some recommendations on some experts that could remove the buckthorn and treat it. It transformed the island back to its natural state. So it was very important for us to get the balance back to the island, and it doesn’t surprise me that the neighbors were in favor or positively affected by that because they all look at the island. It makes the view of the island so much more interesting because you get depth. It looked like an overgrown bush. You couldn’t see into it. You couldn’t penetrate it. Frankly, when you were on the island you couldn’t see the water from the interior of the island. So that was important to us. I don’t know what your experience is with buckthorn but I didn’t realize they grew into trees. Sizeable, 14-inch diameter type size trees. So it was not a small undertaking. At the same time in August of 2018 when we undertook the eradication of the buckthorn, we ran off full speed with an architect to build our dream home and with an attached, if you will, living structure for my mother. We intended to do that via connecting it by a skyway or a tunnel so that we met all of the city requirements. But, the things that make the island beautiful and unique and magical also make it a very challenging piece of property to build on. Again, there are bluffs. There are bluff setbacks. There are wetland setbacks. There was only one sensible place to put the septic system. There is a lot of elevation in the interior of the island so getting the grading right to get up that high is tricky business. Sadly, about five months later after spending a fair amount of money in architectural fees, we bagged it. We were demoralized. We couldn’t get it right. It was like putting together a puzzle and we couldn’t seem to kind of crack the code to make it work, so we stopped. We let several months go by. I did reach out to city staff and I had all sorts’ questions about variances and every time we turned around we hit another complication and we just couldn’t get it to work. But after kind of a cooling off period we took a second attempt at it but we stopped again because it just was overwhelming. It was an emotionally overwhelming, and I know you may be thinking how can it be so hard when there is that much space to work with? But again, all of the complexities layered on top of each other make it a very challenging task. So I circled back with city staff another time looking for more out-of-the-box solutions, if you will, and that’s when I discovered that single-family residential was an option. So, we started looking at that and we realized that that was a really big undertaking. As Sharmeen, the road coming down that services the island from Lake Lucy Road would have to be widened considerably. There were, I think, nine or more agencies that were involved in the original construction of the road and bridge in 1998-1999 and so to bring sewer and water down, the only way we could get our head around that would be to involve a developer and go through the whole subdividing of the island and that’s not what we Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 22 had in mind for the island. We were enamored with natural beauty of it and this felt like we would have to get very creative and create lots and the size of the roads and the cul-de-sacs and the infrastructure just made this a very undesirable option. That led us to the option to consider the PUD which, the way I understand it, is it provides some flexibility in creating exceptions that we are talking about here today but also requires, if you will, something in return, meeting the higher standards, sprinklers, or the turnarounds for the fire trucks, the higher building standards. We intend to build a green, being environmentally green with solar and geothermal and high building standards, and high-quality windows, and recapturing rainwater for reuse, that type of thing. So we intend to meet the higher standards in the conditions put upon the PUD request. This seemed to be a much more sensible solution, not only for what we were trying to accomplish, but really for all parties involved. The impact on the island is much lower than going for single-family residential. It’s better for the community, for the neighborhood, for the island, and so it seemed to be much more sensible and while I suppose the single-family residential is an option, it’s not a very good option. We would like to preserve the integrity of the island, not only now but into the future and we think this is a way to do that. I only have a few more comments if you can bear with me for just a few more moments. I did have a chance to meet with the city and county experts on some of the challenges that the island offers. I was able to walk the island with Fire Chief Don Johnson… (coughing). I just got over COVID so pardon the cough here. Weick: Thanks. Wicka: I’m in the clear now but I can tell it is still affecting my throat. I was able to walk the island with Fire Chief Don Johnson and he understandably had some concerns, some of them that you stated. That’s why we had gone through, I went back to the bridge builder and designers and it is and always was designed to carry not only construction trucks, but emergency vehicles and fire trucks. I’ll come back and be happy to answer questions about that. We also incorporated turnarounds for the fire trucks. I heard some of that commentary and concerns in the previous PUD that you were discussing. So we have accounted for that. I also was able to have a Zoom meeting with Terry Jeffery, Watershed Planning Manager with Bluff Creek. I also learned quite a lot in my conversation with Terry and was very pleased because I know this is high on everybody’s list, keeping the integrity of the water and the cleanliness of the lake. That’s certainly a concern of ours. I was very pleased in that conversation with Terry. He was very matter of fact. He knew exactly which five concerns he had that we needed to meet and we went through them together. I won’t put words in his mouth because I’m sure he’s commented on his own, but by the end of the conversation I think we, I think I can say both agreed that the island actually handled all of these requirements very well, actually. We didn’t have any concerns there. I’ll trust that he gave his own report and that it’s consistent with what I’m saying. The driveway, the purpose for that driveway that runs further to the south that forks off was to service the accessory dwelling unit. The reason for that, and I have a little bit of heartburn giving that up I’ll be honest with you, but I’m willing to make that a condition is because it’s flat. If you can see those topographic lines there it doesn’t climb the elevated area of the island. It runs along the south side and is largely flat. That was intended to make it easier for my aging mother to be able to go out and walk and get outside, frankly, and enjoy the island. But, as I said, we have agreed Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 23 to make it a condition. There were multiple comments on that assuming that’s still desirable we have agreed to have the one driveway service both dwelling units. My final comment is I did initiate some outreach to the Lake Lucy Homeowners Association and that consisted of all lot owners on Lake Lucy and they are the ones most impacted by any development that we do on the island, whatsoever. So I did initiate some outreach there. Because of COVID we weren’t able to organize any in-person meeting, but I did encourage them all to bring any questions or concerns with me. I did hear from three of the parties. I was able to answer their questions. Most of them were curiosities and clarification. I believe I have all of their support, at least I’m not aware of anyone that doesn’t support it. I was able to provide them with clearer maps than were available on the city website so they could get a better understand of what we were after. So, I feel pretty good about engaging the neighborhood and as I said I heard from some of them but I think it was all positive interaction and I hope and I believe that I have their support. Again, I would like to thank you all for your consideration here and I’m happy to take any questions you might have. Weick: Wow. Thank you so much. That offers a lot of color and clarity on what you’re trying to do and thank you for hanging in there with your cough and giving us that. That’s really helpful. I will open it up though. I know there were several questions that commission members had raised that I know would have been properly answered by you. I don’t know if those have already been answered but we’ll open it up to the commission members to either ask follow ups on those questions or ask new questions. McGonagill: Thank you for a very good presentation and walking us through this. You walked with the Fire Chief so I would assume, talk to us about the bridge that there is a certain design standard the bridge has been designed to and it was for construction equipment and for fire equipment and it is your intention to maintain that standard in the bridge going forward? Wicka: Yes it is Commissioner and thank you for the opportunity to come back around and address the concerns around the bridge. Fire Chief Johnson was, we had quite a lot of back and forth via email after our meeting and he was able to provide me with the specifications on the two, I believe they are the two largest trucks, but they are also the two primary trucks that would service the island in case of a fire. I did share that with the company that built the bridge. They went to their engineers and shared with me that the bridge was designed and built to support trucks of that size. That answers I think the question in terms of when it was originally built. I think your question is a fair one in terms of ongoing upkeep and maintenance and as long as it’s a reasonable interval so that, because I am sure there are cost implications that come with this, but as long as there is a reasonable interval to recertify it with an engineering firm that it is still capable or operating as designed, still capable of supporting those trucks, I would be happy to incorporate that. McGonagill: Thank you. I appreciate that because just like you I’ve got some elderly parents and when I call emergency services I want them to be able to get to them, and it’s very true to you, too. On the design, one of the questions I have for you is, I didn’t see it. I may have missed it Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 24 because I just probably missed it. There’s a two-story guest house and there is also an accessory structure at the end of the first driveway. Is that a garage? Wicka: I think it’s ultimately going to be a multi-purpose structure. It’s put there because as someone was pointing out earlier we’re going to be responsible for a lot of private driveway here. So I’m envisioning a plow in there and probably other utility-type tools and needs for the island. We put it there so it was kind of closer to the access point of the island and also a little bit out of the way although we intend to design it such that it’s equally attractive to the rest of the structures on the island. McGonagill: Thank you. That’s all I had Mr. Chairman. Weick: Great. Thank you. Any other questions for our applicant? Skistad: I don’t have a question I just have a, I guess a statement. My goal, my questions about the limitations of the bedrooms was just to make sure we weren’t putting a limitation over the property unnecessarily. That was the only goal with that. I think it sounds like a great project so I’m for it so that was the reason for reason for those questions. Weick: Great. Thank you. Wicka: And thank you Commissioner for that thought. I appreciate it. When it was suggested that it be limited we were agreeable to it because as previously stated the concept is just a space for my mother and perhaps a caregiver. So thank you. Aanenson: Mr. Chair, if you want to open the public hearing. Weick: I will. I was just giving people a second in case they wanted to speak. I always feel like I’m talking over somebody. Thank you Commission members and thank you for, again, a really thorough and honest appraisal of how you are going to use that beautiful piece of property so thank you very much for joining us. At this time I will open the public hearing portion. If anyone would like to come forward and speak and opinion on this matter may do so now. Sharmeen, you already. I might be mixing my cases but I think you already summarized the emails for us, right? Al-Jaff: I did. Weick: Yes. Thank you. And those will be in the record and the telephone number has been up on the screen for a little bit. Would you like to? Yeah, absolutely. So we have someone joining us here in chambers. Again, as you’ve heard, just please speak very loudly into the microphone. Frerichs: Thank you very much. I’m Roger Frerichs and we are neighbors on Lakeway Drive, the street right over next to it. I didn’t come here with any particular speech in mind but I came with less knowledge and so after hearing the discussion of the owner, it sounds like he’s trying to Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 25 maintain the beauty that that island has and that’s why I think it should be something that we should favor. Weick: Thank you so much. I’m happy to agree. I do think it’sa , considering the alternatives, I think it’s certainly a good use. Any phone calls? Al-Jaff: I haven’t heard so far. None. Weick: None. With that and with no one else here in chambers I will close the public hearing portion of tonight’s matter and open to commissioner comment, discussion, and motion. And I pre-empted a little bit there. It is getting late, I have to admit and I’m maybe getting a little dreary. I offered my opinion there a little bit too soon but I am certainly in favor of this PUD. I imagine that if there is concern from neighbors or public like myself, I was envisioning a typical development that we look at where they come in and they grade it down, they clear out the trees, they build four houses and four docks. You know what I mean? That option I think would be disappointing at least to me and I imagine for some of the local residents as well. I would imagine once seeing and hearing these plans it puts to rest those concerns of dramatically changing the view of that island which I just don’t think will happen. I am certainly strongly in favor of the PUD in this instance, and if things want to be added to it, we can certainly do that as part of the motion. McGonagill: Mr. Chairman, I agree with you to stick with the other, just to the small amendment we talked about on the bridge just for emergency access. I’m also there with you because, let’s face it. This is privately owned. It’s property that someone has owned and purposed. They have the constitutional right to develop it and they worked through the process and I think it’s about as nice as one could imagine if he carries out the plans that he’s talking about it would be great. So, yes I think it’s a good use of the property for a very unusual one. Weick: Yeah. Sure. McGonagill: It will add a lot to look of the lake in many ways. But I will be proposing the, some amendment on the, just so the bridge remains within a certain level of usability by fire, by emergency equipment. I’ll say it that way. And I’ll let staff sort out what it needs to look like. Weick: Fair enough. How do the rest of you feel? Von Oven: And therein lies the experience of Commissioner McGonagill because I’m sitting here racking my brain trying to figure out how we amend this thing on the fly and get that all in and he knows he can just rely on staff to do that. I’m in the same boat. It’s funny. One, what a fantastic project both from the standpoint of I’m super jealous of what you are doing. This is beautiful and what a great project. Two, it’s probably the first project that’s come through where as a commissioner I have zero fear of us setting some sort of a precedent here because we’re never going to see another property like this so, variance away here. It’s great. The third part is Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 26 that I’m not at all worried about the applicant and his any lack of letting that bridge deteriorate. He will have every reason in the world to ensure that emergency personnel can access that property. The reason that I will support, however Commissioner McGonagill gets this done, is for the next owner. For that owner down the road who might be renting the property out, which I am also in favor of for long term and I’m glad that provision was put it there, to just ensure that we don’t end up with a situation many, many years from now where someone is renting out the property to someone else and they’re letting the bridge deteriorate. I do not want to put any undue burden on Mr. Wicka for yearly engineering reviews of the bridge. I just don’t know how that works. But finding a way where we ensure that for the long term that very unique structure maintains safety standards without putting the undue burden on Mr. Wicka is what I would be in favor of. McGonagill: I support you in that regard. Five daughters, he’ll have 15 grandchildren pretty soon and he will want emergency personnel in there. Weick: Great. Those are great thoughts and great viewpoints. Go ahead. McGonagill: Are you ready for a recommendation? Weick: Sure. McGonagill moved, Skistad seconded for the Planning Commission to recommend approval of rezoning of the property located at 1601 Lake Lucy Road with an approximate area of 9.03 acres from Rural Residential to Planned Unit Development-Residential incorporating the attached standards and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision recommendation, including an amendment that staff will work with the property owner to develop appropriate safety standards for the continued maintenance of the bridge. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0.