PC Staff Report 01-19-21PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
REPORT
Tuesday, January 19, 2021
Subject Consider a Request for a Variance to Replace/Rebuild Retaining Walls, Add Walkout Terrace,
Add Stairway to Lake, and Reconfigure Lakeside Deck/Patio Located at 6609 Horseshoe
Curve
Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.2.
Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, Associate
Planner
File No: Planning Case No. 202107
PROPOSED MOTION:
The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 19foot bluff impact zone and 29foot bluff
setback variance for the construction of a deck, a bluff impact zone and bluff setback variance for the construction
of retaining walls within the bluff, and a 25foot bluff, 5foot side yard, and 3foot shoreland setback variance for a
wateroriented accessory structure (WOAS), subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopts the attached
Findings of Facts and Decision.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a 19foot bluff impact zone and 29foot bluff setback variance to install an atgrade deck
off of their rear patio door. They are also requesting a bluff impact zone and bluff setback variance to allow for the
reconstruction of retaining walls on the property. Finally, they are proposing constructing a stairway down to the lake
and replacing a nonconforming WOAS. Only the first two of these items require a variance; however, staff is
recommending that the WOAS’s setbacks be included in the variance in order to formally document the nonconforming
setbacks. The applicant has stated that the intent of these variances is to provide a usable area for outdoor recreation
behind the home and to repair failing retaining walls.
The applicant has noted that larger more significant encroachments, i.e. a rear bump out, abovegrade deck, and patio,
were present in the area where they are requesting a variance to install an atgrade deck prior to a 2018 remodel
where these features were removed. They have noted the removal of the previous features have left the rear area
behind the house as an area of dirt and weeds, without any improved area near the rear patio door. They have stated
that adding a deck would provide reasonable use of the area.
The applicant has stated that in 2020, boulders from the failing walls came loose and rolled down the hill causing
damage to their property. They have stated that if they are not permitted to reconstruct the wall, they believe further
erosion and damage will occur. Finally, they have noted that they are proposing replacing one of the walls with a living
wall system which they believe will have significantly less impact than a traditional retaining wall.
The applicant has stated that the stairway system is being proposed to provide safe access to the lake and that the
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, January 19, 2021SubjectConsider a Request for a Variance to Replace/Rebuild Retaining Walls, Add Walkout Terrace,Add Stairway to Lake, and Reconfigure Lakeside Deck/Patio Located at 6609 HorseshoeCurveSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.2.Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, AssociatePlanner File No: Planning Case No. 202107PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 19foot bluff impact zone and 29foot bluffsetback variance for the construction of a deck, a bluff impact zone and bluff setback variance for the constructionof retaining walls within the bluff, and a 25foot bluff, 5foot side yard, and 3foot shoreland setback variance for awateroriented accessory structure (WOAS), subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopts the attachedFindings of Facts and Decision.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThe applicant is requesting a 19foot bluff impact zone and 29foot bluff setback variance to install an atgrade deckoff of their rear patio door. They are also requesting a bluff impact zone and bluff setback variance to allow for thereconstruction of retaining walls on the property. Finally, they are proposing constructing a stairway down to the lakeand replacing a nonconforming WOAS. Only the first two of these items require a variance; however, staff isrecommending that the WOAS’s setbacks be included in the variance in order to formally document the nonconformingsetbacks. The applicant has stated that the intent of these variances is to provide a usable area for outdoor recreationbehind the home and to repair failing retaining walls.The applicant has noted that larger more significant encroachments, i.e. a rear bump out, abovegrade deck, and patio,were present in the area where they are requesting a variance to install an atgrade deck prior to a 2018 remodelwhere these features were removed. They have noted the removal of the previous features have left the rear areabehind the house as an area of dirt and weeds, without any improved area near the rear patio door. They have statedthat adding a deck would provide reasonable use of the area.The applicant has stated that in 2020, boulders from the failing walls came loose and rolled down the hill causingdamage to their property. They have stated that if they are not permitted to reconstruct the wall, they believe furthererosion and damage will occur. Finally, they have noted that they are proposing replacing one of the walls with a livingwall system which they believe will have significantly less impact than a traditional retaining wall.
The applicant has stated that the stairway system is being proposed to provide safe access to the lake and that the
WOAS is being reconfigured to align with the stairs. As was noted, neither of these items require a variance from the
City Code.
Staff recognizes that the applicant has provided a thoughtful proposal that does its utmost to balance the owner's needs
with minimizing the impact to the bluff and lake. Furthermore, if the applicant had proposed the deck as part of the
initial remodel, a substantial portion of it could have been approved without a variance as a reduction to an existing
nonconformity. Additionally, the condition of the existing retaining walls does require action and the applicant’s
proposed living wall solution is designed to address the safety and erosion concerns in a way that improves the bluff
relative to the existing conditions.
While the city is typically extremely hesitant to support variances permitting structures within the bluff impact zone, the
city has been receptive to variances for retaining walls designed to address erosion in the past. Finally, this is a unique
situation in that a bluff was not present on the property when the home was constructed, but was created when the
retaining walls constructed along with the home increased the slope’s grade to an extent that triggered the bluff
ordinance. This change in conditions rendered previously conforming features nonconforming, and has necessitated the
variance process. For these reasons, staff is recommending approval of the variance requests.
A full discussion is provided in the attached staff report.
APPLICANT
Brian T. Bruner, Esq. 6609 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, MN 55317
SITE INFORMATION
PRESENT ZONING: "RSF" SingleFamily Residential District
LAND USE:Residential Low Density
ACREAGE: .64 acres
DENSITY: NA
APPLICATION REGULATIONS
Chapter 1, Section 12, Rules of Construction and Definitions
Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances
Chapter 20, Article II, Division 4. Nonconforming Uses
Chapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District.
Chapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” SingleFamily Residential District
Section 20615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks.
Chapter 20, Article XXVIII, Bluff Protection
BACKGROUND
General History
In April of 1999, the city approved a twolot subdivision with variances allowing for a 20% driveway grade and 81foot
shoreland setback.*
*Note: At the time this subdivision was proposed, the ordinance required structures maintain the shoreland setbacks of the
adjacent properties. This requirement was subsequently repealed and properties are subjected to the current 75foot
shoreland setback.
In July of 1999, the city issued a building permit for the construction of a singlefamily home.
In March of 2000, the city issued a building permit to add a deck.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, January 19, 2021SubjectConsider a Request for a Variance to Replace/Rebuild Retaining Walls, Add Walkout Terrace,Add Stairway to Lake, and Reconfigure Lakeside Deck/Patio Located at 6609 HorseshoeCurveSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.2.Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, AssociatePlanner File No: Planning Case No. 202107PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 19foot bluff impact zone and 29foot bluffsetback variance for the construction of a deck, a bluff impact zone and bluff setback variance for the constructionof retaining walls within the bluff, and a 25foot bluff, 5foot side yard, and 3foot shoreland setback variance for awateroriented accessory structure (WOAS), subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopts the attachedFindings of Facts and Decision.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThe applicant is requesting a 19foot bluff impact zone and 29foot bluff setback variance to install an atgrade deckoff of their rear patio door. They are also requesting a bluff impact zone and bluff setback variance to allow for thereconstruction of retaining walls on the property. Finally, they are proposing constructing a stairway down to the lakeand replacing a nonconforming WOAS. Only the first two of these items require a variance; however, staff isrecommending that the WOAS’s setbacks be included in the variance in order to formally document the nonconformingsetbacks. The applicant has stated that the intent of these variances is to provide a usable area for outdoor recreationbehind the home and to repair failing retaining walls.The applicant has noted that larger more significant encroachments, i.e. a rear bump out, abovegrade deck, and patio,were present in the area where they are requesting a variance to install an atgrade deck prior to a 2018 remodelwhere these features were removed. They have noted the removal of the previous features have left the rear areabehind the house as an area of dirt and weeds, without any improved area near the rear patio door. They have statedthat adding a deck would provide reasonable use of the area.The applicant has stated that in 2020, boulders from the failing walls came loose and rolled down the hill causingdamage to their property. They have stated that if they are not permitted to reconstruct the wall, they believe furthererosion and damage will occur. Finally, they have noted that they are proposing replacing one of the walls with a livingwall system which they believe will have significantly less impact than a traditional retaining wall.The applicant has stated that the stairway system is being proposed to provide safe access to the lake and that theWOAS is being reconfigured to align with the stairs. As was noted, neither of these items require a variance from theCity Code.Staff recognizes that the applicant has provided a thoughtful proposal that does its utmost to balance the owner's needswith minimizing the impact to the bluff and lake. Furthermore, if the applicant had proposed the deck as part of theinitial remodel, a substantial portion of it could have been approved without a variance as a reduction to an existingnonconformity. Additionally, the condition of the existing retaining walls does require action and the applicant’sproposed living wall solution is designed to address the safety and erosion concerns in a way that improves the bluffrelative to the existing conditions.While the city is typically extremely hesitant to support variances permitting structures within the bluff impact zone, thecity has been receptive to variances for retaining walls designed to address erosion in the past. Finally, this is a uniquesituation in that a bluff was not present on the property when the home was constructed, but was created when theretaining walls constructed along with the home increased the slope’s grade to an extent that triggered the bluffordinance. This change in conditions rendered previously conforming features nonconforming, and has necessitated thevariance process. For these reasons, staff is recommending approval of the variance requests.A full discussion is provided in the attached staff report.APPLICANTBrian T. Bruner, Esq. 6609 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, MN 55317SITE INFORMATIONPRESENT ZONING: "RSF" SingleFamily Residential DistrictLAND USE:Residential Low DensityACREAGE: .64 acres DENSITY: NA APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 1, Section 12, Rules of Construction and DefinitionsChapter 20, Article II, Division 3. VariancesChapter 20, Article II, Division 4. Nonconforming UsesChapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District.Chapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” SingleFamily Residential DistrictSection 20615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks.Chapter 20, Article XXVIII, Bluff ProtectionBACKGROUNDGeneral HistoryIn April of 1999, the city approved a twolot subdivision with variances allowing for a 20% driveway grade and 81footshoreland setback.**Note: At the time this subdivision was proposed, the ordinance required structures maintain the shoreland setbacks of theadjacent properties. This requirement was subsequently repealed and properties are subjected to the current 75footshoreland setback.In July of 1999, the city issued a building permit for the construction of a singlefamily home.
In March of 2000, the city issued a building permit to add a deck.
In November of 2018, the city issued a building permit for a significant remodel which include the demolition of the existing
deck and patio.
In June of 2020, the city issued a building permit to add a rooftop deck.
Several permits for interior work and maintenance are also on file with the city.
Case History
On May 21, 2020, the designer contacted staff with a proposal for the site that included a large concrete patio off the rear
of the home, a concrete patio and large WOAS structure near the lake, and front yard parking pad.
On May 22, 2020, staff expressed concerns about the likely presence of a bluff on the property and provided the designer
with the sections of the City Code that they believed would apply to the proposal. Staff indicated that the proposal would
require multiple variances, and that a survey would be required to determine the exact nature and extent of the variances.
On June 16, 2020, the designer sent a revised plan and requested a meeting with staff to discuss potential variances.
On June 18, 2020, staff met with the applicant’s designer to discuss the proposed project. During the meeting, staff
expressed concern regarding the proposed size and placement of the WOAS, proposed front yard parking, and presence
of impervious surface within the bluff impact zone.
On July 16, 2020, staff and the designer met to discuss the proposed project. During the meeting, staff expressed concern
regarding the proposed size and placement of the WOAS, but was supportive of the plans to stabilize the bluff and
proposed pervious patio above the bluff.
On November 20, 2020, staff and the designer met to discuss the proposed project. The proposed WOAS had been
scaled back to address staff’s concerns.
On November 30, 2020, staff and the designer met to discuss the proposed project. No significant concerns were raised.
On December 18, 2020, the applicant submitted the variance request.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approves a 19foot bluff
impact zone and 29foot bluff setback variance for the construction of a deck, a bluff impact zone and bluff setback
variance for the construction of retaining walls within the bluff, and a 25foot bluff, 5foot side yard, and 3foot
shoreland setback variance for a wateroriented accessory structure, subject to the Conditions of Approval, and
adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.
1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction.
2. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the
Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review.
3. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must
be obtained prior to construction.
4. The applicant shall install tree protection fencing at the furthest point from the trunk as possible around all trees
within the grading limits.
5. The applicant shall file for an Encroachment Agreement with the city for any encroachments within public drainage
and utility easements.
6. The wateroriented accessory structure shall be constructed of modular, removable decking for review and
approval by the city prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. The improvements must substantially conform to the plans dated December 18, 2020.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, January 19, 2021SubjectConsider a Request for a Variance to Replace/Rebuild Retaining Walls, Add Walkout Terrace,Add Stairway to Lake, and Reconfigure Lakeside Deck/Patio Located at 6609 HorseshoeCurveSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.2.Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, AssociatePlanner File No: Planning Case No. 202107PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 19foot bluff impact zone and 29foot bluffsetback variance for the construction of a deck, a bluff impact zone and bluff setback variance for the constructionof retaining walls within the bluff, and a 25foot bluff, 5foot side yard, and 3foot shoreland setback variance for awateroriented accessory structure (WOAS), subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopts the attachedFindings of Facts and Decision.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThe applicant is requesting a 19foot bluff impact zone and 29foot bluff setback variance to install an atgrade deckoff of their rear patio door. They are also requesting a bluff impact zone and bluff setback variance to allow for thereconstruction of retaining walls on the property. Finally, they are proposing constructing a stairway down to the lakeand replacing a nonconforming WOAS. Only the first two of these items require a variance; however, staff isrecommending that the WOAS’s setbacks be included in the variance in order to formally document the nonconformingsetbacks. The applicant has stated that the intent of these variances is to provide a usable area for outdoor recreationbehind the home and to repair failing retaining walls.The applicant has noted that larger more significant encroachments, i.e. a rear bump out, abovegrade deck, and patio,were present in the area where they are requesting a variance to install an atgrade deck prior to a 2018 remodelwhere these features were removed. They have noted the removal of the previous features have left the rear areabehind the house as an area of dirt and weeds, without any improved area near the rear patio door. They have statedthat adding a deck would provide reasonable use of the area.The applicant has stated that in 2020, boulders from the failing walls came loose and rolled down the hill causingdamage to their property. They have stated that if they are not permitted to reconstruct the wall, they believe furthererosion and damage will occur. Finally, they have noted that they are proposing replacing one of the walls with a livingwall system which they believe will have significantly less impact than a traditional retaining wall.The applicant has stated that the stairway system is being proposed to provide safe access to the lake and that theWOAS is being reconfigured to align with the stairs. As was noted, neither of these items require a variance from theCity Code.Staff recognizes that the applicant has provided a thoughtful proposal that does its utmost to balance the owner's needswith minimizing the impact to the bluff and lake. Furthermore, if the applicant had proposed the deck as part of theinitial remodel, a substantial portion of it could have been approved without a variance as a reduction to an existingnonconformity. Additionally, the condition of the existing retaining walls does require action and the applicant’sproposed living wall solution is designed to address the safety and erosion concerns in a way that improves the bluffrelative to the existing conditions.While the city is typically extremely hesitant to support variances permitting structures within the bluff impact zone, thecity has been receptive to variances for retaining walls designed to address erosion in the past. Finally, this is a uniquesituation in that a bluff was not present on the property when the home was constructed, but was created when theretaining walls constructed along with the home increased the slope’s grade to an extent that triggered the bluffordinance. This change in conditions rendered previously conforming features nonconforming, and has necessitated thevariance process. For these reasons, staff is recommending approval of the variance requests.A full discussion is provided in the attached staff report.APPLICANTBrian T. Bruner, Esq. 6609 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, MN 55317SITE INFORMATIONPRESENT ZONING: "RSF" SingleFamily Residential DistrictLAND USE:Residential Low DensityACREAGE: .64 acres DENSITY: NA APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 1, Section 12, Rules of Construction and DefinitionsChapter 20, Article II, Division 3. VariancesChapter 20, Article II, Division 4. Nonconforming UsesChapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District.Chapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” SingleFamily Residential DistrictSection 20615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks.Chapter 20, Article XXVIII, Bluff ProtectionBACKGROUNDGeneral HistoryIn April of 1999, the city approved a twolot subdivision with variances allowing for a 20% driveway grade and 81footshoreland setback.**Note: At the time this subdivision was proposed, the ordinance required structures maintain the shoreland setbacks of theadjacent properties. This requirement was subsequently repealed and properties are subjected to the current 75footshoreland setback.In July of 1999, the city issued a building permit for the construction of a singlefamily home.In March of 2000, the city issued a building permit to add a deck.In November of 2018, the city issued a building permit for a significant remodel which include the demolition of the existingdeck and patio.In June of 2020, the city issued a building permit to add a rooftop deck.Several permits for interior work and maintenance are also on file with the city.Case HistoryOn May 21, 2020, the designer contacted staff with a proposal for the site that included a large concrete patio off the rearof the home, a concrete patio and large WOAS structure near the lake, and front yard parking pad.On May 22, 2020, staff expressed concerns about the likely presence of a bluff on the property and provided the designerwith the sections of the City Code that they believed would apply to the proposal. Staff indicated that the proposal wouldrequire multiple variances, and that a survey would be required to determine the exact nature and extent of the variances.On June 16, 2020, the designer sent a revised plan and requested a meeting with staff to discuss potential variances.On June 18, 2020, staff met with the applicant’s designer to discuss the proposed project. During the meeting, staffexpressed concern regarding the proposed size and placement of the WOAS, proposed front yard parking, and presenceof impervious surface within the bluff impact zone.On July 16, 2020, staff and the designer met to discuss the proposed project. During the meeting, staff expressed concernregarding the proposed size and placement of the WOAS, but was supportive of the plans to stabilize the bluff andproposed pervious patio above the bluff.On November 20, 2020, staff and the designer met to discuss the proposed project. The proposed WOAS had beenscaled back to address staff’s concerns.On November 30, 2020, staff and the designer met to discuss the proposed project. No significant concerns were raised.On December 18, 2020, the applicant submitted the variance request.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends the Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approves a 19foot bluffimpact zone and 29foot bluff setback variance for the construction of a deck, a bluff impact zone and bluff setbackvariance for the construction of retaining walls within the bluff, and a 25foot bluff, 5foot side yard, and 3footshoreland setback variance for a wateroriented accessory structure, subject to the Conditions of Approval, andadopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction.2. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of theMinnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review.3. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit mustbe obtained prior to construction.4. The applicant shall install tree protection fencing at the furthest point from the trunk as possible around all treeswithin the grading limits.5. The applicant shall file for an Encroachment Agreement with the city for any encroachments within public drainageand utility easements.6. The wateroriented accessory structure shall be constructed of modular, removable decking for review andapproval by the city prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. The improvements must substantially conform to the plans dated December 18, 2020.
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff Report
Findings of Fact (Approval)
Variance Document
Development Review Application
Narrative
Justification of Request
Plan Set
Variance Document Pages: Aerials, Previous Existing Site Plan/Notes, Existing Site Photos
Variance Document Pages: Existing Site Photos
Variance Document Pages: Existing Site Photos
Variance Document Page: Existing Site Photo, 3D Model Renderings
ERS Memo
WRC Memo
Engineering Memo
Affidavit of Mailing
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PC DATE: January, 19 2021
CC DATE: February 8, 2021
REVIEW DEADLINE: February 16, 2021
CASE #: PC 2021-07
BY: MYW
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The applicant is proposing placing an at-grade deck outside their rear patio door approximately
one foot from the top of the bluff, reconstructing a failing retaining wall within the bluff, adding
a staircase to provide safe access to the lake, and replacing a water-oriented accessory structure
(WOAS) with nonconforming area, bluff setbacks, side yard setbacks, and shoreland setbacks.
Since the deck and retaining wall are within the bluff, a variance is required; however, the stairs
and replacement of the nonconforming WOAS are permitted by City Code without a variance.
LOCATION: 6609 Horseshoe Curve
APPLICANT: Brian T. Bruner, Esq.
6609 Horseshoe Curve
Chanhassen, MN 55317
OWNER: Elise R. Bruner, Esq.
6609 Horseshoe Curve
Chanhassen, MN 55317
PRESENT ZONING: “RSF” – Single-Family
Residential District
2040 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density
ACREAGE: .64 acres DENSITY: NA
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed
project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The city has a relatively
high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from
established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
PROPOSED MOTION:
“The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 19-foot bluff impact zone and
29-foot bluff setback variance for the construction of a deck, a bluff impact zone and bluff setback
variance for the construction of retaining walls within the bluff, and a 25-foot bluff, 5-foot side
yard, and 3-foot shoreland setback variance for a water-oriented accessory structure (WOAS),
subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.”
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 2
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting 19-foot bluff impact zone and 29-foot bluff setback variance to install
an at-grade deck off of their rear patio door. They are also requesting a bluff impact zone and
bluff setback variance to allow for the reconstruction of retaining walls on the property. Finally,
they are proposing constructing a stairway down to the lake and replacing a nonconforming
WOAS. Only the first two of these items require a variance; however, staff is recommending that
the WOAS’s setbacks be included in the variance in order to formally document the
nonconforming setbacks. The applicant has stated that the intent of these variances is to provide
a usable area for outdoor recreation behind the home and to repair failing retaining walls.
The applicant has noted that larger more significant encroachments, i.e. a rear bump out, above-
grade deck, and patio, were present in the area where they are requesting a variance to install an
at grade deck prior to a 2018 remodel where these features were removed. They have noted the
removal of the previous features have left the rear area behind the house as an area of dirt and
weeds, without any improved area near the rear patio door. They have stated that adding a deck
would provide reasonable use of the area.
The applicant has stated that in 2020, boulders from the failing walls came loose and rolled down
the hill causing damage to their property. They have stated that if they are not permitted to
reconstruct the wall, they believe further erosion and damage will occur. Finally, they have noted
that they are proposing replacing one of the walls with a living wall system which they believe
will have significantly less impact than a traditional retaining wall.
The applicant has stated that the stairway system is being proposed to provide safe access to the
lake and that the WOAS is being reconfigured to align with the stairs. As was noted, neither of
these items require a variance from the City Code.
Staff recognizes that the applicant has provide a thoughtful proposal that does its utmost to
balance the owners’ needs with minimizing the impact to the bluff and lake. Furthermore, if the
applicant had proposed the deck as part of the initial remodel, a substantial portion of it could
have been approved without a variance as a reduction to an existing nonconformity.
Additionally, the condition of the existing retaining walls does require action and the applicant’s
proposed living wall solution is designed to address the safety and erosion concerns in a way that
improves the bluff relative to the existing conditions.
While the city is typically extremely hesitant to support variances permitting structures within
the bluff impact zone, the city has been receptive to variances for retaining walls designed to
address erosion in the past. Finally, this is a unique situation in that a bluff was not present on the
property when the home was constructed, but was created when the retaining walls constructed
along with the home increased the slope’s grade to an extent that triggered the bluff ordinance.
This change in conditions rendered previously conforming features nonconforming, and has
necessitated the variance process. For these reasons, staff is recommending approval of the
variance requests.
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 3
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 1, Section 1-2, Rules of Construction and Definitions
Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances
Chapter 20, Article II, Division 4. Nonconforming Uses
Chapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District.
Chapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” Single-Family Residential District
Section 20-615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks.
Chapter 20, Article XXVIII, Bluff Protection
BACKGROUND
General History
In April of 1999, the city approved a two-lot subdivision with variances allowing for a 20%
driveway grade and 81-foot shoreland setback.*
*Note: At the time this subdivision was proposed, the ordinance required structures maintain the
shoreland setbacks of the adjacent properties. This requirement was subsequently repealed and
properties are subjected to the current 75-foot shoreland setback.
In July of 1999, the city issued a building permit for the construction of a single-family home.
In March of 2000, the city issued a building permit to add a deck.
In November of 2018, the city issued a building permit for a significant remodel which include the
demolition of the existing deck and patio.
In June of 2020, the city issued a building permit to add a rooftop deck.
Several permits for interior work and maintenance are also on file with the city.
Case History
On May 21, 2020, the designer contacted staff with a proposal for the site that included a large
concrete patio off the rear of the home, a concrete patio and large water oriented accessory structure
near the lake, and front yard parking pad.
On May 22, 2020, staff expressed concerns about the likely presence of a bluff on the property and
provided the designer with the sections of the City Code that they believed would apply to the
proposal. Staff indicated that the proposal would require multiple variances, and that a survey would
be required to determine the exact nature and extent of the variances.
On June 16, 2020, the designer sent a revised plan and requested a meeting with staff to discuss
potential variances.
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 4
On June 18, 2020, staff met with the applicant’s designer to discuss the proposed project. During the
meeting staff expressed concern regarding the proposed size and placement of the water oriented
accessory structure, proposed front yard parking, and presence of impervious surface within the
bluff impact zone.
On July 1 6, 2020, staff and the designer met to discuss the proposed project. During the meeting
staff expressed concern regarding the proposed size and placement of the water oriented accessory
structure, but was supportive of the plans to stabilize the bluff and proposed pervious patio above
the bluff.
On November 20, 2020, staff and the designer met to discuss the proposed project. The proposed
water oriented structure had been scaled back to address staff’s concerns.
On November 30, 2020, staff and the designer met to discuss the proposed project. No significant
concerns were raised.
On December 18, 2020, the applicant submitted the variance request.
SITE CONSTRAINTS
Zoning Overview
The property is zoned Single-Family Residential District, is located within the Shoreland
Management District, and is subject to the bluff protection ordinance. This zoning classification
requires riparian lots to be a minimum of 20,000 square feet, have front and rear yard setbacks of
30 feet, side yard setbacks of 10 feet, a shoreland setback of 75 feet, and limits parcels to a
maximum of 25 percent lot cover. Residential structures are limited to 35 feet in height, and
properties are allowed one water oriented accessory structure up to 250 square feet in size within
the 75-foot shoreland setback. Structures must be setback 30 feet from the top, side, and toe of
the bluff, and alteration of the land and vegetation within the bluff impact zone is heavily
restricted. Both the shoreland and bluff ordinance allow the construction of stairways, lifts, and
landings, subject to design criteria. A portion of the property is also encumbered by a sanitary
sewer easement.
The lot is 27,878 square feet with 6,377 square feet (23 percent) lot cover. The existing house
has a nonconforming bluff setback of between 5 and 19 feet, with a porch that encroaches into
the bluff. The property also features retaining walls located within the bluff impact zone. The
home’s WOAS is a nonconforming 308-square foot structure with a 3-foot bluff setback, 5-foot
side yard setback, and 7-foot shoreland setback. This WOAS is also located within the city’s
sanitary sewer easement. The house and other features appear to meet all other requirements of
the City Code.
Bluff Creek Corridor
This is not encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District.
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 5
Bluff Protection
There is a bluff on the property. The city’s bluff protection ordinance requires structures to be
setback 30 feet from the top, toe, and side of the bluff and prohibits the alteration to land or
vegetation within the bluff impact zone, the area of the bluff and within 20 feet of the top of the
bluff. Stairways, lifts, and landings are permitted in areas where they will not redirect water flow
or increase drainage velocity so long as they do not exceed four feet in width and meet other
design criteria. Limited topographic alterations, grading, and filling within the bluff impact zone
is permitted through an earthwork permit, subject to standards designed to protect the integrity of
the bluff.
Floodplain Overlay
This property is not within a floodplain.
Shoreland Management
The property is located within a Shoreland Protection District. This district requires a 75-foot
structure setback from the lake’s ordinary high water level (OHWL) and limits the property to a
maximum impervious surface coverage of 25 percent. The shoreland ordinance permits one
WOAS to be located within the 75-foot shoreland setback, provided that it is at least 10 feet from
the ordinary high water level, no larger than 250 square feet, and has a maximum height of 10
feet. Stairways, lifts and landings providing access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore
areas are also permitted so long as they do not exceed four feet in width, do not cause soil
erosion, and meet other design criteria.
Wetland Protection
There is not a wetland located in the development site.
NEIGHBORHOOD
Pleasant View/Alicia Heights
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 6
The plat for Pleasant View was
recorded in March of 1910 and
Alicia Heights, a two lot subdivision
within Pleasant View, was recorded
in June of 1999. Pleasant View is
one of the oldest neighborhoods in
the city and it predates the
establishment of the City of
Chanhassen and its ordinances. The
neighborhood is located on a
peninsula jutting into Lotus Lake
and this combined with challenging
topography meaning it has a large
number of atypically shaped lots,
many of which do not conform to
current city standards. Some of the
homes are original to the
neighborhood, while others are new
construction or have been
extensively updated. Many
properties have nonconforming
elements or have received variances
due to the age of the neighborhood
and atypical configuration of the
lots.
Variances within 500 feet:
6605 Horseshoe Curve (PC 1991-09): 17’ shoreland setback (deck) – Approved
6631 Horseshoe Curve (PC 1996-07): 15’ shoreland setback (addition and attached garage) –
Approved
6677 Horseshoe Curve (PC 1982-03): 25’ front and 7’ side setback (detached garage) –
Approved
6681 Horseshoe Curve (PC 1986-15): 6’ side setback (detached garage) – Withdrawn
(PC 1987-03): 6’ side setback (detached garage) – Approved
(PC 2002-10): 16’ front and 5’ side setback, 4% LC (detached garage
and addition) – Approved
6691 Horseshoe Curve (PC 1987-14): 19.6’ front setback (detached garage) – Approved
6697 Horseshoe Curve (PC 1985-02): 9.03’ side setback (addition, intensify non-conforming) –
Approved
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 7
ANALYSIS
At-Grade Deck
The applicant is requesting a variance
to place an at-grade deck
approximately one foot from the top
of the bluff. Initially, the applicant
had expressed interest in a patio made
of an impervious surface; however,
after staff expressed concern over the
placement of impervious surface
within the bluff impact zone, the
request was revised to feature a
surface comprised of pervious
decking, complete with drainage
system. It should be noted that prior
to the property’s 2018 renovation, a
144-square foot bump out projected 8
feet from the home for a 12-foot bluff setback, a 225-square foot above-grade deck projected out
15 feet from the existing porch and was located partially within the bluff, and an approximately
200-square foot concrete patio connected the deck and bump out within the bluff impact zone.
In comparison to the 2018 conditions on the property, the applicant is proposing replacing
approximately 344 square feet of impervious surface within the bluff impact zone and a 225-
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 8
square foot deck partially located within the bluff with approximately 652 square feet of pervious
decking setback one foot from the top of the bluff at its closest point. Since the nonconforming
deck, bump out, and patio were removed over a year ago, the applicant is not entitled to replace
them nor can the proposed deck be approved without a variance as a reduction to an existing
nonconformity; however, even if the requested variance is granted for the proposed deck, the
removal of impervious surface within the bluff impact zone and of the encroachment into the
bluff itself does represent an improvement to the original conditions present on the property.
A final factor in determining the appropriateness of granting a variance, is the fact that a bluff
was not present on the property when the home was built. In 1999, when the home was built,
there was a steep slope in the rear yard that did not meet the definition of a bluff. As part of the
permit to construct the home, a retaining wall was shown in the rear yard. This retaining wall
leveled off approximately 20 feet of the rear yard creating a steeper slope that met the definition
of a bluff. Since the original survey did not show a bluff on the property and as-built surveys
were not required at that time, permits were issued based on the fact that the available survey did
not show a bluff until the scope of work proposed in May 2020 triggered the need for a new
survey and the presence of a bluff was confirmed.
Ordinarily, staff would not support the construction of a structure within the bluff impact zone;
however, this is a very unique situation. The 2018 removal of the pre-existing structures has left
the area to the rear of the house as a patch of bare soil and weeds, meaning that many of the
ordinary concerns about removing vegetation within the bluff impact zone are not a factor, and
the applicant is proposing making significant improvements to prevent further degradation of the
bluff as discussed in the following subsection. Additionally, the applicant’s desire to have an
improved area outside of their patio door is reasonable and in keeping with what is present on the
surrounding properties. While the applicant’s proposed deck is larger than the minimum size
necessary to provide an improved surface off of the patio door, staff believes the requested
dimensions are reasonable in light of what was previously present on the property.
For the above reasons, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve a 19-foot
bluff impact zone and a 29-foot bluff setback variance to permit the construction of the proposed
deck.
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 9
Retaining Walls
The applicant is proposing to rebuild two
retaining walls within the bluff impact zone.
Both of these retaining walls are boulder
walls and the applicant states that the
southern retaining walls is failing with
boulders having come loose and rolling
down the hill during a June 21, 2020 rain
storm. They believe that if the wall is not
replaced, additional wall failures will occur,
causing the slope to suffer additional erosion
and possibly resulting in rocks and sediment
reaching the lake.
The applicant is proposing replacing the southern
retaining wall with a living wall system. The living
wall system will utilizes a type of geogrid replete with
plantings to anchor and support the slope. These
systems utilize both geogrid and root structure of the
plants to help prevent erosion, and the plant roots
have the added benefit of helping to absorb
stormwater. The applicant has stated that this type of
construction will require less material than a
traditional timber or boulder retaining wall. The
applicant is also proposing using fescue on the lakeside slope, as its relatively deep root system
makes it a good low maintenance option for the area.
Staff concurs with the applicant’s
assessment that the existing southern
retaining wall must be replaced, and
believes that the proposed living wall
system is a viable, innovative, and
environmentally responsible way to
shore up that section of the slope. Since
the living wall system requires regrading
that will extend the “retaining wall” area
further into the bluff, it is not considered
a simple replacement of an existing
nonconforming use and requires a
variance; however, staff believes the
proposal represents an improvement
over rebuilding the existing boulder
retaining wall within its current footprint, which could be done without a variance.
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 10
The applicant is also proposing removing a boulder retaining wall on the west
portion of the property and replacing it with a smaller concrete retaining wall.
The proposed western retaining wall is located almost entirely within the
footprint of the existing boulder retaining wall, and the majority of the existing
retaining wall running along the top of the bluff is being removed. While the
northwestern most corner of the new retaining wall will be located outside of
the existing footprint, it is the area furthest from the top of the bluff. The
applicant is also proposing a drainage system to help manage the stormwater
associated with the retaining wall. Since the existing western retaining wall
could be rebuilt in its current more impactful configuration without a variance
as a continuation of an existing nonconformity, staff believes that it is
appropriate to grant a variance to accommodate the less impactful revised
placement.
For the above reasons, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve the
variance to permit the construction of retaining walls within the bluff impact zone.
Water-Oriented Accessory Structure (WOAS)
The property has a nonconforming WOAS
that is a combination of impervious patio and
pervious decking. This structure is
approximately 308 square feet, 58 square feet
larger than the maximum size permitted by
ordinance, and has a nonconforming 3-foot
bluff, 7-foot shoreland, and 5-foot side yard
setback. Additionally, the structure is located
overtop of a sanitary sewer line. The
applicant is proposing replacing this with a
smaller modular shoreline deck.
Since the proposed WOAS is 220 square feet,
entirely pervious, removable, and setback an
additional 2 feet from the toe of the bluff, this
is a clear reduction to the existing
nonconformity and does not require a
variance. Staff is including the structure’s
setbacks in the requested variance for the sole purpose of formally documenting the structure’s
nonconforming status and preventing any future confusion as to the legality of the structure’s
size, placement, and composition.
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 11
Impact on Neighborhood
Pleasant View is an older neighborhood with
many atypically shaped lots, nonconformities,
and variances. The applicant’s proposal will
result in a smaller nonconforming WOAS, a
stabilized slope, and the creation of an at-
grade deck approximately 92 feet from the
lake’s OHWL. The proposed deck will have
less of a visual impact than the deck and patio
that were present on the property before the
2018 remodel, and both the proposed
retaining wall and WOAS are smaller and
less visually obtrusive than what is currently
present on the property. The applicant has
also worked to create a proposal that is
minimally impactful to the property’s
environmental features. The use of a living
wall system instead of a traditional retaining
wall will help stabilize the bluff and should
prevent further erosion. None of the applicant’s proposed improvements will negatively impact
the neighboring properties or recreational users of Lotus Lake.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments,
approves a 19-foot bluff impact zone and 29-foot bluff setback variance for the construction of a
deck, a bluff impact zone and bluff setback variance for the construction of retaining walls
within the bluff, and a 25-foot bluff, 5-foot side yard, and 3-foot shoreland setback variance for a
water-oriented accessory structure, subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopts the
attached Findings of Facts and Decision.
1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction.
2. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets
all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or
requirements may be required after plan review.
3. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and
a building permit must be obtained prior to construction.
4. The applicant shall install tree protection fencing at the furthest point from the trunk as
possible around all trees within the grading limits.
5. The applicant shall file for an Encroachment Agreement with the city for any
encroachments within public drainage and utility easements.
6. The water-oriented accessory structure shall be constructed of modular, removable
decking for review and approval by the city prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. The improvements must substantially conform to the plans dated December 18, 2020.
6609 Horseshoe Curve
January 19, 2021
Page 12
ATTACHMENTS
1. Findings of Fact and Decision (Approval)
2. Variance Document (Approval)
3. Development Review Application
4. Variance Request Narrative
5. Variance Request Justification
6. Plan Set
7. Variance Documents
8. Landscaping and Tree Preservation Memo
9. WRC Memo
10. Engineering Memo
11. Affidavit of Mailing
g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-07 6609 horseshoe curve\staff report_6609 horseshoe curve_var.doc
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
(APPROVAL)
IN RE:
Application of Brain T. Bruner, Esq. on behalf of Elise R. Bruner, Esq. for a variance to
replace/rebuilt retaining walls, add a walk-out terrace, and reconfigure a lakeside deck/patio on a
property zoned Single-Family Residential District (RSF) - Planning Case 2021-07.
On January 19, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and
Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed
notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential District (RSF).
2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density.
3. The legal description of the property is:
Lots 1, Block 1, Alicia Heights
4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the
granting of a variance:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and
intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Finding: It is the intent of the city’s Zoning Code to protect the city’s environmental
resources by preventing the construction of structures near the top, side, and toe of bluffs as
well as limiting the size and nature of structures near lakes; however, property owners have
the right to repair and replace nonconforming structures. It is also the intent of the
nonconforming use ordinance to encourage property owners with nonconforming structures
to reduce the extent of existing nonconformities and bring their properties closer to
complying with City Code by allowing them to replace an existing nonconforming structure
with a less intensive nonconformity.
In this case, the applicant’s proposal reduces the size and impact of a nonconforming, water-
oriented accessory structure (WOAS), replaces a failing boulder retaining wall with a more
environmentally sensitive living wall, and replaces another boulder retaining wall with a
smaller concrete wall located further from the top of the bluff. While the footprints of the two
walls in places exceed the footprints of the walls they are replacing, they are less impactful
2
than the walls that they are replacing and represent an environmentally responsible solution
for a complicated parcel with numerous nonconformities.
The proposed deck is replacing a deck, patio, and bump out that was removed from the bluff
impact zone in 2018. While the nonconforming use ordinance does stipulate that
nonconformities discontinued for more than a year cannot be replaced, the proposed deck has
been designed to have minimal impact on the bluff and is much less impactful than what was
previously present on the property.
Given that it is the intent of the City Code to allow the owners of nonconforming properties
opportunities to make reasonable improvements their property, granting a variance to permit
thoughtfully designed and environmentally sensitive improvements that remove numerous
nonconforming elements is in line with the intent of the City Code and consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property
owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter.
Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems.
Finding: The applicant’s proposal to add a deck to the property is reasonable given the
improvements (deck, patio, and bump out) that were previously present on the property and
the presence of broadly similar rear-facing decks and patios present on neighboring
properties. Additionally, the presence of steep slopes throughout the rear yard means there is
not place where a rear-facing deck could be placed without receiving a variance from the
city’s bluff ordinance.
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations.
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the
landowner.
Finding: The plight of the landowner is due to pre-existing conditions on the property,
including the nonconforming location of the house, retaining walls, and water-oriented
structure. All of these conditions were present on the property, prior to the applicant
purchasing the property and commencing their remodeling and landscaping projects.
e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Finding: Pleasant View/Alicia Heights is an older neighborhood with many atypically
shaped lots, nonconformities, and variances. The applicant’s proposal will result a smaller
nonconforming WOAS, a stabilized slope, and the creation of an at-grade deck
approximately 92 feet from the lake’s Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL). The proposed
deck will have less of a visual impact than the deck and patio that were present on the
property before the 2018 remodel, and both the proposed retaining wall and WOAS are
3
smaller and less visually obtrusive than what is currently present on the property. The
applicant has also worked to create a proposal that is minimally impactful to the property’s
environmental features. The use of a living wall system instead of a traditional retaining wall
will help stabilize the bluff and should prevent further erosion. None of the applicant’s
proposed improvements will negatively impact the neighboring properties or recreational
users of Lotus Lake.
f. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes
Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter.
Finding: This does not apply to this request.
5. The planning report #2021-07, dated January 19, 2021, prepared by MacKenzie Young-Walters,
is incorporated herein.
DECISION
“The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 19-foot bluff impact zone
and 29-foot bluff setback variance for the construction of a deck, a bluff impact zone and bluff
setback variance for the construction of retaining walls within the bluff, and a 25-foot bluff, 5-foot
side yard, and 3-foot shoreland setback variance for a water-oriented structure, subject to the
following conditions of approval:
1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction.
2. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all
requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements
may be required after plan review
3. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a
building permit must be obtained prior to construction.
4. The applicant shall install tree protection fencing at the furthest point from the trunk as
possible around all trees within the grading limits.
5. The applicant shall file for an Encroachment Agreement with the city for any encroachments
within public drainage and utility easements.
6. The water-oriented structure shall be constructed of modular, removable decking for review
and approval by the city prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. The improvements must substantially conform to the plans dated December 18, 2020.”
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 19th day of January, 2021.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
Steven Weick, Chairman
g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-07 6609 horseshoe curve\findings of fact and decision 6609 horseshoe curve (approval).doc
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA
VARIANCE 2021-07
1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby
grants the following variance:
The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 19-foot bluff impact zone
and 29-foot bluff setback variance for the construction of a deck, a bluff impact zone and
bluff setback variance for the construction of retaining walls within the bluff, and a 25-
foot bluff, 5-foot side yard, and 3-foot shoreland setback variance for a water-oriented
structure.
2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County,
Minnesota, and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Alicia Heights.
3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction.
2. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that the proposed building
meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or
requirements may be required after plan review
3. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and
a building permit must be obtained prior to construction.
4. The applicant shall install tree protection fencing at the furthest point from the trunk as
possible around all trees within the grading limits.
5. The applicant shall file for an Encroachment Agreement with the city for any
encroachments within public drainage and utility easements.
6. The water-oriented structure shall be constructed of modular, removable decking for
review and approval by the city prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. The improvements must substantially conform to the plans dated December 18, 2020.
2
4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not
been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse.
Dated: January 19, 2021 CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
(SEAL) Elise Ryan, Mayor
AND:
Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
(ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2021 by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager, of the City of
Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to
authority granted by its City Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-07 6609 horseshoe curve\variance document 21-07.doc
Y//
*crTYotcumuAssrtl
6lrx! e: APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A ' I
sr.F:*ar Dare.'*-'E!+*ilo- "" *"-j.:9."- ;;;-ggEi-t 6GDav Re,ie* *teg=4-
(Refer to lhe awo$iele Applicdbh chccmst lot E,quiad submital i,:/o,,7r|allm thel mud a&omparly lhis adication)
! Comprehensive Plan Amendment...
E Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ...
E Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
E SingleFamily Residence..............................
E All Others.........
fl lnterim Use Permit (lUP)
E ln coniunction with Single.Family Residence
E A[ others.........
fl Rezoning lRez;! Planned Unit Development (PUD) ................
E Minor Amendment to existing PUD...............
! A orhers........
E Sign Plan Review...................
D Subdivision (SUB)
E create 3 lots or less
E create over 3 lots ...
D Site Plan Review (SPR)
! Administrative. ....... .. ..'.... $100
D Commerciaulndustrial Districis'...............-...... 5500
Plus $'10 per 1,000 square feet of building area:( thousand square feet)
'lndude number ofglELtq employees:
-
'lndude n8ber of 49q emPloYees:
E Residential Oistricls............................ ............ $500
Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( units)
E Notitication Sign (city to irEtalland remove).........-....... " '
E Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generab anet preapplicstion rEeing)
( lots)
D Metes & Bounds (2 lots)............
E Consolidate Lots..... . ........ .
D LotLineAdiustmen1............ ........
D Final P|at.........
(lncludes S45O escrow for attomey costs)'
;Additonal es6ow may b€ required for other apdicaUons
through ttle develoPment contrad.
! Vacation of Easements,/R€ht-of-way (VAC)
(Additronal recordirE fees may apply)
E Variance (VAR)
! Wetland Alteralion Permit (WAP)
E Single-Family Residence ..... ........ . ....
E Att others........
E Zoning Appeal.
E Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA).........
$3 per address
( ?z addresses)
..................,.... $50 per document
D Site Phn Agreement
n Wetland Atteration Permit
E Deeds
TOTAL FE
!q!Ei Yl,ihen mulupl€ .pplications a,e proco+ted coicu,rendy,
the approp.ids lre shall be ch.rgod for each application.
$600
$100
$325
9425
$325
$425
$750
$100
sso0
$1s0
s300
$200
s150
$275
$100
$500
$200
E] Esffow for Recording Oocuments (check allthat apply) . .. -fl conditional Use Fermit D lnterim Use Permit
Ei vacation fl Variance
I u*es a Bounds subdivision (3 docs.) ! Easements 1- easements)l<r
e (check all that aPPIY)Section 1: Application TYP
Section 2: Required lnformation
Description of P.oposal: Replace / Reconfigure Existing Boulder Retaining Wall variance
6609 Horseshoe Curve, Chanhassen, Minnosota 55317
Parcel #:
Residential250550010Legal Description
Present Land Use Designation
0.64 Wetlands Present?
Single Family Rssidential Districl (RSF)
Select One Requested Land Use Designation Select One
Total Acreage:
Present Zoning
EYes ENo
Requested Zoning Select One
Existing Use of Property:Residential
Echeck box if separate nanative is attached
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ptannino Division - 7700 Market Boulevard
i,taiting
-Aaoress - p.O. Box 147. Chanhassen, MN 55317
Phonet (952\ 227-1100 I Fax. 1952\ 227-1110
Property Address or Location:
Owner and APP|icant lnformationSection 3: Property
APPUGANToTHERTHANPRoPERTYowNER:lnsigningthisaPplication.|.asapplicant.representtohaveobtained
aurhorization ftom ," p.p"rty o*nriti, or" itriilipil*ti'"n. iagree io be bound bv conditions of approval' subiect only to
the right to object at tne nearings onl appii"ation or ouring th; appeal oeriod. lf ihis application has not been signed by
the property owner. r nare aracneo'se;;i;;;;.;"i;iioriot full ligal ;apacitv to file the application This application
shourd be processed in ,y n"r"
"n-o-iJ,r-it'.
prrtv "t". tt'" city s[ould tontia regarding any matter pertaining to this
aootication. I wi1 keep mysetf int"#J "i
tf'"-6i"-"Oiines for submilsion oimaeriat an-a tne progress of this application' I
furiher understand rt
"t "aoirion"r
r*!lri;;;;E; k;
";nsuhing.fees
feasibility studies' etc with an estimate prior to
any authorization to proceeO w1;r tnliirJi.-Ljiiifi tfr"t rf'L informition and exhibit! submitled are true and correct'
Name
-7. Enr.v1.a-- t Es-
Address:uuDq V th-l
c M N ,f! r-7 Cell:
Fax:
(.lL'L.r'r1 q
City/State/zip t
Email glbran,r PA -l-v-ra.'l. (.../t
Signature:Date:tz-/rsk z-
PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as property owner, have full legal capacity to' and hereby do'
authorize the fiting of tnis appticationl t ['nO""t"nO'tt "i "oi1ditions
of approval are 6inding and.agree to be bound by those
conditions, subject onty to the right i; ;d; ;i th; heirlngs or Ouring.i# appeal penods: I will keep mysetf informed of
the deadtines for suumission ot matJriatlno tt'" p.G"J; thi" appiication. l further understand thal additional fees mav
O. "n"id for *nsutting fees, feasiOir,tyiirii*i"iJ- *irr, an estimlte prior to any authorization to proceed with the
study. icerlify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and conect'
Name EI;v'u Contact:
Address: U o rh,, a Phone:
City/Statezip c ^^ Aal Y<.^lvlN ,t3 r'1 Cell:
Fax:
1S L- 1r7-LL./ j
Email: e rn \ri a-1 h6+Jw!-i ( - Co t,".-.
Date:I z_l tq/t t.
PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable)
Name:
Address:
Contact:
Phone:
City/Statezip:
Email:
Cell
Fax
Who should receive copies of staff reports?'Other Contact lnformation:
Property Owner Via:AppllEnt Via:Engineer Via:Othef Va:
aa Email
Email
Email
Email
E Mailed Paper copy Name Travis Van Liere
atr
Mailed Paper Copy
Maaled Paper Copy
Address 21 1 N 1st St #350
City/Slatefzip:
Email:
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT:Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a coPy to your
device. PRINT FORit and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT F ORM to send a digital
copy to the city for processing.
SAVE FOR PRINT FORiIi SUB ]T FORH
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A
writien notice ot applicaiion deliciencies shall be mailed to the applicanl within 15 business days of application.
nformation
appropriate
redandlansallberequed bymandStpuaccompanlbyicationUmbestThsapp istheckCtheloreferApplicationfithSrovtstonSBeforelingapplicationp
raluleordandnancermdeteneprocedthetoapplicabrtmentspecificn9Depa
applicable City Ordinance
and confer with lhe Plann
requirements and Ees.
tra A Mailed Paper copy
MN 55401
Contact:
Phone:
n^7 Pr--
Signature:
Section4: Notificationlnformation
Za
UZ
fu llin
o 612 345 4275
minneapolis, mn 55401
211 north 1st street suite #350
TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO
tvls
December 18, 2020
City of Chanhassen
Community Development Department
Planning Division
7700 Market Blvd
PO Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
RE: WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST
To whom it may concern,
As required by the City of Chanhassen, we are respectfully submitting this written description of
variance requests for the following property:
Bruner Residence
6609 Horseshoe Curve
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Variances Requested
1. Bluff Setback Area Encroachment Variance
2. Replace / Reconfigure Existing Boulder Retaining Wall Variance
Summary of Concern
The existing home on this property was built in 1999 and recently remodeled in 2017 by Christian
Dean Architecture. The landscape was not considered at that time, so the current project is
looking to finalize landscaping on the property while considering client needs while respectfully
meeting existing codes and standards.
This house non-conforming due to encroachment into bluff setback, hence variance for certain
items are needed. Please see the written justification of variance request for further information.
Our design team met with the city planning office several times throughout the process of this
project. Below is a summary of our previous meetings and their outcomes:
1
o 612 345 4275
minneapolis, mn 55401
211 north 1st street suite #350
TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO
tvls
July 16, 2020
• Meeting Contact: MacKenzie Walters
The primary landscape elements discussed at this meeting included:
- Proposed storage water-oriented accessory structure location and requirements
- Proposed walk-out terrace
- Proposed lakeside staircase connecting walk-out terrace to lakeside deck
- Proposed erosion control system to improve and replace failing boulder retaining wall
- Proposed low maintenance grasses to naturalize and cover full property ground cover
- Proposed new driveway access to property entry
November 20, 2020
• Meeting Contact: Erik Henricksen
The primary landscape elements discussed at this meeting included:
- Omitted proposed storage water-oriented accessory structure
- Modified material of proposed walk-out terrace from precast concrete to porous wood
decking material
- Modified material of proposed lakeside staircase from precast concrete to porous
wood decking material
- Simplified grading of proposed lakeside staircase from heavy grading to grading as
needed
- Proposed lakeside deck
- Fits within the footprint of existing concrete patio
- Maintains alignment with the rest of the plan layout
- Porous wood decking
- Proposed erosion control system to replace failing boulder retaining wall (unchanged
from last review)
- Proposed low maintenance grasses to naturalize and cover full property ground cover
(unchanged from last review)
- Proposed new driveway access to property entry (unchanged from last review)
2
o 612 345 4275
minneapolis, mn 55401
211 north 1st street suite #350
TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO
tvls
Conclusion
Our design team and the clients have continued to work with the city and other governing agencies
to develop a plan that maintains the spirit and works in concert with the applicable city codes and
ordinances while providing practical use for the property by the owners.
Thank you in advance for your due consideration of our request for a variance.
Sincerely,
Travis Van Liere, PLA, ASLA
Principal - Travis Van Liere Studio
3
December 4, 2020
City of Chanhassen
Community Development Department
Planning Division
7700 Market Blvd
PO Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
RE: WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION OF HOW VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 6606
HORSESHOE CURVE, CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 COMPLIES WITH THE FINDINGS
FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 20-58
Dear Planning Division,
As required by the City of Chanhassen, we are respectfully submitting this written
justification in support of our variance request currently pending with your office.
Overview and Introduction
My name is Elise Bruner, and my husband, Brian, and our daughter, Sieglinde, reside at
6609 Horseshoe Curve in Chanhassen. I am writing this written justification on behalf of
myself and my family. By way of background, I grew up in Chanhassen on the very
same property that is currently under review by the Planning Division. The name of the
parcel of land, Alicia Heights, is, in fact, named after my mother, Alicia. My childhood
home, now 6611 Horseshoe Curve, was the only home I knew. The property of 6609
was split and sold in 1999 and the new home was built where we are living presently.
As such, I have a very deep connection to this property.
Practical Difficulties
We understand that variances are requested when the strict enforcement of the
ordinance would cause a “practical difficulty” because of circumstances unique to the
property, such as when the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its
size, physical surroundings, shape, or topography. In consideration of all equities and
hardships in this case, we believe that our application warrants favorable discretion,
since everything we hope to do will improve the use of this property and reduce further
degradation of the property.
•Reasonableness
We confirm that as homeowners, we propose to use our property in a reasonable
manner. While we would like to use our property in a particularly reasonable way, we
cannot currently do so under the rules of the applicable ordinance.
At the current time, we do not have reasonable use of our lake property. With a
severely sloped property from the road to the house, and again from the front
side to lake, there are essentially two (2) limited flat areas on the lakeside for
family recreation, including:
(1)lower patio area by the slider door that is accessible from our walk-out home.
(2)flat patio area by shoreline.
The rest of the land is not usable for quiet enjoyment beyond a nature-scape. To this
end, we wish to create livable space for reasonable use as follows:
•Build a lower-level deck patio outside the slider door that is directly
accessible from our walk-out home. There is currently nothing outside our
slider door other than dirt and weeds. Building a deck is a reasonable use and
extension of our home.
•Build a staircase from the lower-level deck patio to the lakeshore. We
currently have no easy access to the lake without concern for falling, tripping, or
losing one’s balance. We have witnessed able-bodied friends slip while trying to
get down to the lake, and anyone with physical limitations would arguably not be
comfortable going down to the lake. Without an appropriate staircase, this will
continue to be a problem. The distance from our lower-level slider door to
the lakeshore is about 117 feet and has a 29.75-foot grade change. This is
just over a 25% slope.
•Build a modular (removable pieces) shoreline deck patio near the
lakeshore. This would comport with necessary setbacks and allow access for
maintenance of the utility line in this area.
•Uniqueness
Our current problem is due to circumstances unique to this property and was not
caused by our actions. As noted by the enclosed photographs and topography, the
physical characteristics of our property present unique challenges due to the sloping
topography and limited accessible space for use.
When we purchased the property in 2016, the home, boulder retaining walls, lakeshore
platform, and lack of staircase were all pre-existing factors. In 2019, we removed a 144
square-foot bump out on the lakeside of the house, as well as a deck that protruded
toward the lake 8 feet as part of an extensive home remodel that was approved by the
City of Chanhassen. Those structures are no longer present. However, without certain
reasonable improvements, the current state of the property is not sustainable for
enjoyable use over the long run.
•Boulders rolling down the hill – On June 21, 2020, boulders that are present in
an already dilapidated retaining fall came loose and rolled down the hill due to
the rains. The boulder retaining wall is no longer safe and has already caused
damage to the pre-existing shoreline platform. There are about 5 large boulders
that have already rolled down the hill. Please see enclosed pictures for proof.
We anticipate that without a new retaining wall, erosion and damage will
continue.
•Run off around the house and down the hill – Without an appropriate
drainage plan, sediment, rocks, etc. will continue to degrade the property and
ultimately go into the lake – which is what we remain concerned about.
Without improvements, the pre-existing susceptibilities of the property will only continue
to grow.
• Essential Character
Provided the variance is granted, the comprehensive plan will not alter the essential
character of our property or locality. The resulting structure of the boat house, as well
as the stairs and deck, will not be out of scale, out of place, or otherwise inconsistent
with the surrounding area. Please see enclosed photographs for similarly situated
staircases and boathouses on Lotus Lake.
The proposed comprehensive plan is more protective of the environment than
what is currently present. Please consider the following:
•Use of permeable deck surfaces will allow water to percolate into the soil to
filter out pollutants and recharge the water table. As noted in the enclosed
comprehensive plan, we intend to use permeable deck material on the lower-level patio,
staircase, and lakeshore deck to ensure that water is properly channeled into the
underlying soil, which will force slow percolation during periods of heavy rainfall.
•Use of Living Walls will again allow water to absorb into the soil and slow
erosion. As noted in the enclosed comprehensive plan, we intend to use a living
wall instead of the pre-existing boulder retaining wall. Living retaining
walls function just as a traditional stone or timber wall, and typically require much
less actual building material to construct. In keeping with the plan, we hope to
reduce storm water runoff and erosion.
•Use of Fescue “Low Grow No Mow” Application of fescue on the lakeside
slope is currently present, as we have already had great success with the
product, but we will continue the seeding of the entire lakeside area accordingly.
The use of this product is environmentally friendly due to the relatively deep root
systems (4-9”), which enhance drought-resistance by reducing water loss and
reaching deeper water reserves. Due to the nature of the fescue, once planted, it
requires only minimal water and no chemical fertilizers or pesticides for proper
maintenance.
•Preservation of Tree Canopy The comprehensive plan seeks to preserve the
pre-existing tree canopy on the property. We do not wish to disrupt the beauty of
the mature trees that we have.
CONCLUSION
Thank you in advance for your due consideration of our request for a variance.
Sincerely,
Elise Bruner and Brian Bruner
BRUNER RESIDENCE
VARIANCE APPLICATION DRAWINGS
DECEMBER 18. 2020
L000
PROJECT INFORMATION
N/A
SKeet #TitOe IssXeG
PRELIMINARY
PRICING SET PERMIT BID SET CD SET LANDSCAPE
REVISIONS
L000 PROJECT INFORMATION Ɣ
L001 GENERAL NOTES Ɣ
L009 EXISTING INCOMING SURVEY Ɣ
L010 EXISTING CONDITIONS REMOVALS PLAN Ɣ
L011 OVERLAY DIAGRAM Ɣ
L101 SITE PLAN Ɣ
L102 SURFACING AND WALLS PLAN
L103 SITE FURNISHINGS AND LIGHTING PLAN
L201 GRADING PLAN Ɣ
L401 LANDSCAPE PLAN Ɣ
L501 WALL ELEVATIONS Ɣ
L601 WALL, DOCK, DECK DETAILS Ɣ
L602 PAVING DETAILS Ɣ
L603 LIGHTING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS Ɣ
L607 PLANTING DETAILS Ɣ
L608 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS Ɣ
L700 SCHEDULES AND SPECIFICATIONS
SHEET INDEX
LOCATION MAP
SITE ADDRESS:
6609 HORSESHOE CURVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
LOT SIZE:
SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION
ZONING:
SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION
BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION AND
VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR PROJECT
JURISDICTION:
CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MN
OWNER:
BRIAN AND ELISE BRUNER
6609 HORSESHOE CURVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
SURVEY INFO PROVIDED BY:
EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC.
1229 TYLER STREET NE #100
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413
T 612 466 3300
PROJECT INFO:
PROJECT SITE
7
5
A
ABV ABOVE
AD AREA DRAIN
ADA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
ADJ ADJACENT
AGG AGGREGATE
ALGN ALIGNMENT
ALUM ALUMINUM
ANOD ANODIZED
APPROX APPROXIMATE
ARCH ARCHITECT, ARCHITECTURE
AVG AVERAGE
B
BB BALLED AND BURLAPPED
BC BACK OF CURB
BFFE BASEMENT FINISHED FLOOR
ELEVATION
BLDG BUILDING
BOC BOTTOM OF CURB
BOP BOTTOM OF POOL
BOR BOTTOM OF RAMP
BOS BOTTOM OF STAIR
BOT BOTTOM
BOW BOTTOM OF WALL
BTWN BETWEEN
C
CAL CALIPER
CAP CAPACITY
CB CATCH BASIN
CHAM CHAMFER
CIP CAST IN PLACE
CIVIL CIVIL ENGINEER
CJ CONTROL JOINT
CL CENTER LINE
CLR CLEAR, CLEARANCE
CM CENTIMETER
CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
CO CLEAN OUT
COL COLUMN
COMP COMPOSITE, COMPACTED
CONC CONCRETE
COND CONDITION
CONIF CONIFEROUS
CONST CONSTRUCTION
CONT CONTINUOUS
CNTR CENTER
CF CUBIC FEET
CU CUBIC
CY CUBIC YARDS
D
(D)DEEP, DEPTH
DBL DOUBLE
DECID DECIDUOUS
DEMO DEMOLISH, DEMOLITION
DET DETAIL
DIA DIAMETER
DIM/S DIMENSION/S
DN DOWN
DR DRAIN
DWG/S DRAWING/S
E
E EAST
EA EACH
EJ EXPANSION JOINT
EL ELEVATION
ELEC ELECTRICAL
EQ EQUAL
EQUIP EQUIPMENT
EST ESTIMATE
ETR EXISTING TO REMAIN
E.W.EACH WAY
EXP EXPOSED
EXT EXTERIOR
EXTG EXISTING
F
FDN FOUNDATION
F.F.FILTER FABRIC
FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
FG FINISHED GRADE
FIN FINISH
FL FLOOR
FOB FACE OF BRICK
FOC FACE OF CONCRETE
FOW FACE OF WALL
FT FEET, FOOT
FTG FOOTING
FURN FURNISHING
FUT FUTURE
G
GA GAUGE
GALV GALVANIZED
GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR
GEN GENERAL, GENERATOR
GEO GEO-TECHNICAL
GL GLASS, GLAZING
H
(H)HIGH/HEIGHT
HB HOSE BIB
HC HANDICAP
HDCP HANDICAP, HANDICAPPED
HDWD HARDWOOD
HDWR HARDWARE
HORIZ HORIZONTAL
H.P.HIGH POINT
HR HANDRAIL
HT HEIGHT
I
I.D.INSIDE DIAMETER, INSIDE DIMENSION
I.E.INVERT ELEVATION
IN INCH, INCHES
INCL INCLUDED
INSUL INSULATION
INT INTERIOR
INV INVERT ELEVATION
J
JST JOIST
JT JOINT
K
K.O.KNOCK OUT
L
(L)LENGTH
L.A.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
LB POUND
L.F.LINEAR FOOT
LOCN LOCATION
LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
L.P.LOW POINT
LT LIGHT
M
MAINT MAINTAIN, MAINTENANCE
MAS MASONRY
MAT MATERIAL
MAX MAXIMUM
MECH MECHANICAL
MEMB MEMBRANE
MFR MANUFACTURER
MH MANHOLE
MIN MINIMUM
MISC MISCELLANEOUS
MTL METAL
N
N NORTH
N/A NOT APPLICABLE
N.F.C.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
N.I.C.NOT IN CONTRACT
No.NUMBER
NOM NOMINAL
NTS NOT TO SCALE
O
OA OVERALL
O.C.ON CENTER
O.D.OUTSIDE DIAMETER, OUTSIDE DIMENSION
OFD OVERFLOW DRAIN
OH OVERHEAD
OHW ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
OPNG OPENING
OPP OPPOSITE
ORNM ORNAMENTAL
P
PA PLANTED AREA
PAR PARALLEL
PC POINT OF CURVATURE, PRECAST
PERF PERFORATED
PERP PERPENDICULAR
PL PLATE, PROPERTY LINE
PLYWD PLYWOOD
PNT PAINT
POB POINT OF BEGINNING
POI POINT OF INTERSECTION
POT POINT OF TANGENCY
PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT
PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
PT POINT, PRESSURE TREATED
PU POLYURETHANE
PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE
PVMT PAVEMENT
PVR PAVER
Q
QTR QUARTER
QTY QUANTITY
R
R RISER, RELOCATE
(R)RISER HEIGHT
RAD RADIUS
RD ROOF DRAIN
REBAR REINFORCING BAR
RECEPT RECEPTACLE
RECT RECTANGULAR
REF REFERENCE
REINF REINFORCED, REINFORCEMENT
REM REMOVE
REQD REQUIRED
RET RETAINING, RETURN
REV REVISION
RO ROUGH OPENING
ROW RIGHT OF WAY
RP RADIUS POINT
RT RIGHT
S
S SOUTH
SCHED SCHEDULE
SECT SECTION
SD STORM DRAIN
S.F.SQUARE FEET
SHT SHEET
SIM SIMILAR
SLR SEALER
SPEC SPECIFICATION
SPP SPECIES
SQ SQUARE
SS SANITARY SEWER
SST STAINLESS STEEL
ST STORM SEWER
STA STATION
STD STANDARD
STL STEEL
STRUCT STRUCTURE, STRUCTURAL
SURF SURFACE, SURFACING
S.Y.SQUARE YARD
SYM SYMMETRICAL
T
(T)THICK
T&B TOP AND BOTTOM
TBC TOP OF BACK OF CURB
TBD TO BE DETERMINED
THR THRESHOLD
TOC TOP OF CURB, TOP OF CONCRETE
TOD TOP OF DECK
TOF TOP OF FOOTING
TOP TOP OF PAVING
TOPO TOPOGRAPHY
TOR TOP OF RAMP
TOS TOP OF STAIR
TOW TOP OF WALL
TRANS ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER
TSL TOP OF SLAB
TVLS TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO
TYP TYPICAL
U
UTIL UTILITY
V
VAR VARIABLE, VARIES
VEH VEHICLE
VIF VERIFY IN FIELD
VERT VERTICAL
VOL VOLUME
W
W WEST
(W)WIDE, WIDTH
W/WITH
W/O WITHOUT
WD WOOD
WL WATER LEVEL
WP WATERPROOF, WORK POINT
WS WATER SUPPLY
WT WEIGHT
WTR WATER
WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC
WWM WELDED WIRE MESH
Y
YD YARD
SYMBOLS
&AND
∠ANGLE
⌒ARC LENGTH
@ AT
℄CENTER LINE
Ø DIAMETER
°DEGREE
#NUMBER, POUND
/PER
±PLUS/MINUS
⅊PROPERTY LINE
℄SF
X X X X
LOD
OHW
SS
ST
LANDSCAPE LINE LEGENDLANDSCAPE SYMBOL LEGENDLANDSCAPE ABBREVIATIONS
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION000.00
PROPOSED
SPOT ELEVATION
DET
SHT
DET
SHT
TRAFFIC
FLOW
X
EXISTING TREES
TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING TREES TO BE
SAVED AND PROTECTED
NEW DECIDUOUS TREE
NEW CONIFEROUS TREE
NEW SHRUB
NEW PERENNIAL/ANNUAL
CB RD AD
AIR CONDITIONER UNIT
CATCH BASIN, ROOF
DRAIN, OR AREA DRAIN
GAS METER
WATER METER
S
P.E.
GEN.GENERATOR
HOSE BIB
EXTERIOR
ELECTRICAL OUTLET
EXTERIOR LIGHT SWITCH
AC
HB
WTR
GAS
LIGHT FIXTURES
TRASH CONTAINER
PLANTER POT
SWING GATE
SHT
SHT
PUP-UP EMITTER
-XP
-XW
-XE
-XS
-XL
-XR
-XF
X
XXX
XXX.XX
LOCN
POT
CONTOUR ELEVATION
DATUM ELEVATION
TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW
KEY NOTE
SHEET NOTE
EDGING TYPE
FENCING TYPE
LIGHTING TYPE
PAVING TYPE
REMOVAL
SITE ELEMENT
WALL TYPE
GROUNDCOVER TYPE
PLANTING REFERENCE
ALGN
POB
000.00
TOW
X
POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF ENTRY
AT BUILDING
1
REVISION CLOUD
REVISION NUMBER
PARALLEL
ALIGNMENT
QTY
SPP
ELEVATION CALLOUT
DETAIL CALLOUT
SECTION CALLOUT
MATCH LINE / CONTROL LINE
STRUCTURAL GRID LINE
AREA OF ENLARGEMENT
SYMMETRY
SPRINKLER HEADS
BREAK LINE
PAVING HATCH LEGEND
G
X
X
DET
SHT
PLANT HATCH LEGEND
SECTION/DETAIL HATCH LEGEND
XXX
PROPERTY LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT
SETBACK
CENTER LINE
SILT FENCE
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
ORDINARY HIGH WATER
MARK
DRAIN TILE
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
EXISTING CONTOURS
PROPOSED CONTOURS
XX
X
90°180°270°360°
SLOPE-AT-SURFACE/
DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW
X.XX
STAIRDN
UP
ASPHALT SURFACING
UNIT PAVER (RUNNING BOND)
UNIT PAVER (HERRINGBONE)
DRY-SET UNIT PAVER
FLAGSTONE PAVING
AGGREGATE SURFACING
PAVING/SITE ELEMENT
TO BE REMOVED
GRASSPAVE POUROUS PAVER
RIPRAP
TURFSTONE PAVERS
MORTAR-SET UNIT PAVER
CONCRETE
ASPHALT
STONE, TYPE 1
STONE, TYPE 2
MORTAR
GRANULAR FILL
COMPACTED AGGREGATE
METAL
WOOD
DIMENSIONAL
LUMBER (SECTION)
PLANTING SOIL
EARTH (DISTURBED)
EARTH (COMPACTED
OR UNDISTURBED)
GRASSPAVE POROUS
GRASS PAVER
TURFSTONE
STONE, TYPE 3
NETLON ADVANCED
TURF SYSTEM
TURF
PLANTING AREA
GROUNDCOVER TYPE 1
GROUNDCOVER TYPE 2
GROUNDCOVER TYPE 3
CONCRETE SURFACING
SAND SURFACING
SAND
SEEDING TYPE 2
SEEDING TYPE 1
FESCUE
creation Gate:11/19/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L000.GZJOast saveG:EretZieseOer DecePEer 16, 2020 5:11 PMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
L001
GENERAL NOTES
N/A
GENERAL NOTES
1.USE OF THE WORD 'CONTRACTOR' IN THE
DRAWINGS INDICATES BOTH THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS
ON THE PROJECT.
2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL
MATERIALS AND LABOR TO COMPLETE THE
SCOPE OF WORK AS INDICATED IN THE
DOCUMENTS.
3.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONTRACTORS
ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING
THEIR WORK WITH THE WORK OF OTHERS.
NEITHER THE OWNER NOR THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
COORDINATION OF THE WORK. NO
ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE
TO ANY CONTRACTOR FOR EXTRA WORK
RESULTING FROM FAILURES OF
COORDINATION.
4.THE CONTRACTOR MUST ASSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES,
REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS AND
INSPECTIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR
MATERIALS SUPPLIED.
5.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
APPLYING FOR, OBTAINING, AND PAYING FOR
ALL NECESSARY PERMITS, APPROVALS AND
INSPECTIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE
INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A COPY OF
ALL DRAWINGS WITH THEM ON SITE AT ALL
TIMES AND SHALL RECORD ALL
MODIFICATIONS/CHANGES TO THE WORK ON
THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROVIDE A COMPLETE AS-BUILT SET OF
DRAWINGS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
AT PROJECT COMPLETION.
7.EXCEPT FOR ITEMS SPECIFICALLY MARKED
AS 'BY OTHERS' OR 'NOT IN CONTRACT', IT IS
THE INTENT OF THESE DRAWINGS TO
DESCRIBE A COMPLETE PROJECT. THE
CONTRACTOR MUST THOROUGHLY REVIEW
THE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID
AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS
DISCOVERED. NO ADDITIONAL
COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE FOR ITEMS OF
WORK NOT SHOWN OR DESCRIBED ON THE
DRAWINGS THAT COULD BE REASONABLY
INFERRED FROM THE DRAWINGS IN
PROVIDING THE OWNER WITH COMPLETE
SYSTEMS AND A COMPLETE PROJECT.
8.EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE
DRAWINGS ARE FROM A SURVEY PERFORMED
BY OTHERS. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC
FEATURES MAY NOT BE EXACT AS TO THEIR
LOCATION, CHARACTER, OR NUMBER. THE
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
VERIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF THE SITE
PRIOR TO BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION AND
FOR IMMEDIATELY NOTIFYING THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE
DRAWINGS.
9.THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN AND
PROTECT ALL BENCH MARKS, SURVEY
MONUMENTS, PROPERTY IRONS, LAYOUT
STAKES AND OTHER REFERENCE POINTS. ALL
FINES AND REPLACEMENT COSTS FOR
DAMAGE TO ANY OF THESE ITEMS THAT IS
DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S ACTS OR
NEGLIGENCE ARE THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
10.THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD EXPECT TO FIND
TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC, GAS, CABLE
TELEVISION, AND FIBER OPTIC LINES,
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, AND OTHER PUBLIC
AND PRIVATE UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR, IN
COOPERATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE
UTILITY COMPANY, IS RESPONSIBLE TO
VERIFY THE LOCATION, SIZE, AND DEPTH OF
ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY. AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR
MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT
800 252 1166 OR TO NOTIFY THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AND
VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE, AND
DEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES WITH THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES.
11.ANY RELOCATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES SHALL
BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY
AND ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY
COMPANY, INCLUDING FEES, BONDS, PERMITS
REQUIRED FOR SUCH WORK.
12.PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC
RIGHT OF WAY, THE CONTRACTOR MUST
OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND
SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
COMPLYING WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF
THE MNDOT ROADWAY REQUIREMENTS.
13.DO NOT PROCEED WITH ANY PORTION OF
WORK AS INDICATED IN THE DOCUMENTS IF
OBSTRUCTIONS, DISCREPANCIES OR
UNKNOWN CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED.
NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY
ON HOW BEST TO PROCEED.
14.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN A
SAFE AND SECURE SITE THROUGHOUT THE
PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL,
STATE, AND LOCAL SAFETY ORDINANCES.
15.UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF
PROJECT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST
IN WRITING, A FINAL ACCEPTANCE
INSPECTION WITH THE OWNER AND
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
CODES
1.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE LOCAL CODES AND
ALL OTHER GOVERNING AUTHORITIES HAVING
JURISDICTION.
2.APPLICABLE CODES: THIS PROJECT IS TO
COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN
MUNICIPAL CODE AND SUB-CODE
REQUIREMENTS AND STATE OF MINNESOTA
CODE REQUIREMENTS.
3.VERIFY IF THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE
SPECIAL REVIEW AND APPROVALS FROM THE
RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT.
SUBMITTALS / SHOP DRAWINGS / SITE MOCK-UPS
1.CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE SHOP
DRAWINGS AND FIELD MOCKUPS TO THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR FINAL REVIEW
AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: PAVING, WALLS,
FENCES, SPECIAL METAL FABRICATIONS &
CONNECTIONS, SPECIAL FINISHES,
SPECIALTY DETAILS, AND LIGHTING.
2.MOCK-UPS WILL ESTABLISH EXPECTATIONS
FOR QUALITY NAD WORKMANSHIP.
3.MOCK-UPS WILL BE SET UP IN A SECURED
PORTION OF THE SITE FOR REFERENCE
THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND REMAIN
UNTIL PROJECT SITE CONSTRUCTION
COMPLETION.
4.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW, STAMP, SIGN
AND DATE ALL SUBMITTALS PRIOR TO
FORWARDING TO ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. THE
ENGINEER¶S REVIEW IS FOR CONFORMANCE
WITH THE DESIGN CONCEPT AND GENERAL
COMPLIANCE WITH THE RELEVANT CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS. THE ARCHITECTS REVIEW DOES
NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THE SOLE
RESPONSIBILITY TO REVIEW, CHECK AND
COORDINATE THE SUBMITTALS THE
CONTRACTOR REMAINS SOLELY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
IN THE SUBMITTALS.
5.ALL CONTRACTORS SHALL SUBMIT SHOP
DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL
PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH ANY WORK.
6.SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN THE FORM OF
BLACK-LINE PRINTS OR PORTABLE
DOCUMENT FORMAT (PDF) FOR REVIEW.
EXISTING CONDITIONS / REMOVALS NOTES
1.VERIFY AND STAKE ALL PROPERTY LINES AND
STRUCTURE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO
COMMENCING WITH CONSTRUCTION.
MAINTAIN PROPERTY LINE STAKES, CONTROL
POINTS, BENCH MARKS, AND OFFSET STAKES
THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. ANY LOST
SURVEY MARKERS TO BE REPLACED BY THE
CONTRACTOR AT THE CONTRACTORS
EXPENSE.
2.THE LIMITS OF WORK INDICATED ON
DRAWINGS, ARE GENERAL IN NATURE AND
ARE INTENDED TO DEFINE THE GENERAL
VICINITY IN WHICH THE SCOPE OF WORK
EXISTS. ACTUAL LIMITS OF WORK SHALL
INCLUDE AREAS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE
THE SCOPE OF DESIGN INTENT.
3.THE CONTRACTOR MUST REVIEW THE LIMITS
OF WORK WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. ANY WORK
OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORK AS SHOWN ON
THE DRAWINGS OR AS MODIFIED IN THE FIELD
BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL BE
DONE AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE UNLESS
THE CONTRACTOR NOTIFIES THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT OF THE NEED FOR THE WORK IN
WRITING AND IS DIRECTED TO PERFORM THE
WORK BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER
BEFORE PERFORMING THE WORK.
RESTORATION OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY
PAVEMENTS, CURB, GUTTER, PLANT
MATERIALS, TURF, UTILITIES, OR OTHER SITE
ELEMENTS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORK
THAT ARE DAMAGED DUE TO THE
CONTRACTOR'S ACTS OR NEGLIGENCE WILL
BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE
EXTENT AND ACCEPTABILITY OF THE
REPLACEMENT WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
4.A TREE PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR
MUST SIGN ALL PERMITS AND PAY THE
PERMIT FEE BEFORE STARTING WORK AND
MUST COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS
OF ALL GOVERNING AGENCIES IN
PERFORMING THE WORK OF THIS PROJECT.
5.THE CONTRACTOR MUST MEET AND
IMPLEMENT ALL NPDES, SWPPP, AND
EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS IN
EFFECT AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION
6.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY
REMOVAL WORK AND MUST BE MAINTAINED
UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY
IMPLEMENTED AND ESTABLISHED.
7.INSTALL SILT FENCING AROUND THE
PERIMETER OF THE LIMITS OF WORK AND
MAINTAIN UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION
CONTROL IS ESTABLISHED. ALL SILT FENCE
MUST HAVE GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC WITH STEEL
POSTS. MACHINE SLICING OF SILT FENCE
AROUND OR UNDER TREES WILL NOT BE
PERMITTED. SILT FENCE AROUND OR UNDER
TREES MUST BE HAND PLACED AND
FASTENED TO THE GROUND WITH STAPLES.
8.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
REVIEWING THE EROSION CONTROL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SITE AND FOR
INSTALLING AND MAINTAINING EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES WHERE NEEDED, EVEN
IF THEY ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE
DRAWINGS.
9.INLET PROTECTION (SILT FENCE BARRICADES,
SILT SACKS, RISER PIPES, OR FILTER FABRIC
AND GRAVEL) MUST BE INSTALLED IN ALL
EXISTING AFFECTED CATCH BASINS PRIOR TO
ANY REMOVAL WORK AND IN ALL NEW CATCH
BASINS IMMEDIATELY AFTER CATCH BASIN
INSTALLATION.
10.ADJACENT STREETS, ALLEYS, AND
PROPERTIES MUST BE SWEPT TO KEEP THEM
FREE OF SEDIMENT AND MATERIALS
TRACKED, BLOWN, OR WASHED FROM THE
SITE. CONTRACTOR MUST MONITOR
CONDITIONS AND SWEEP AS NEEDED OR
WITHIN 24 HOURS NOTICE BY THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT. SWEEPING IS INCIDENTAL TO THE
PROJECT.
11.CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN DUST
CONTROL FOR THE SITE AT ALL TIMES AND
PROVIDE WATERING TRUCKS AS NEEDED OR
WITHIN 24 HOURS NOTICE BY THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT. DUST CONTROL IS INCIDENTAL
TO THE PROJECT.
12.WHERE DISTURBED SOILS WILL LAY EXPOSED
FOR MORE THAN 21 DAYS, THE CONTRACTOR
MUST SEED WITH A TEMPORARY COVER
CROP TO PREVENT EROSION. TEMPORARY
SEED MIX MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TEMPORARY
SEEDING IS INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT.
13.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE
FOR SECURING THE SITE AND PROVIDING
PROTECTION FROM THE WORK FOR THE
PUBLIC. ALL OPEN EXCAVATIONS AND OTHER
HAZARDS MUST BE FENCED.
14.THE RELOCATION AND/OR PROTECTION OF
ALL EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BE
COORDINATED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND
ANY COSTS FOR SUCH WORK IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. NO
ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE
ALLOWED FOR EXTRA TIME AND EFFORT OR
PROVISIONS NECESSARY TO WORK AROUND
ANY UTILITIES.
15.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO
REPORT ANY EXISTING DAMAGE OR FAULTY
CONDITION OF ANY UTILITIES TO THE UTILITY
OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION AS, ONCE WORK HAS
COMMENCED, IT WILL BE ASSUMED THAT ALL
DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE
GROUND INSTALLATIONS HAS BEEN CAUSED
BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS AND IT
WILL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY
TO MAKE THE NECESSARY REPAIRS. UPON
COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, CONTACT ALL
UTILITY OWNERS AND MAKE ARRANGEMENTS
FOR A FIELD INSPECTION TRIP BY A
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CONTRACTOR AND
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UTILITY OWNERS
TO CONFIRM THAT ALL DAMAGE CAUSED BY
THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN
REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE
OWNERS
16.THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT ALL
EXISTING ROADS, CURB, STRUCTURES,
TREES, AND SITE ELEMENTS NOT
DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL. ANY DAMAGE
SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT
CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT.
17.ITEMS SHALL REMAIN UNTIL DESIGNATED FOR
REMOVAL. REMOVE DESIGNATION ITEMS
SHOWN ON THE PLAN TO THE FULL DEPTH OF
THEIR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
18.VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DIMENSION OF
ITEMS TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.
19.ALL CONCRETE AND ASPHALT REMOVAL
SHALL BE SAW CUT. EDGES OF MATERIALS
TO REMAIN SHALL BE SHORED UP AND
PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO
PRESERVE EDGE INTACT. REPAIRS TO
DAMAGED EDGES TO BE DONE WITH CARE
AND AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
20.ITEMS ENCOUNTERED BELOW GRADE AND
NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE
BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
21.SALVAGE EXISTING MATERIALS AS INDICATED
ON THE PLANS. REMOVE SALVAGED
MATERIALS AS INDICATED WITH CARE AND
STORE ON SITE IF APPLICABLE, CLEAN ALL
DEBRIS AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL FROM
SALVAGED ITEMS AND REUSE AS DIRECTED
BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
22.REMOVE DEMOLISHED MATERIALS FROM SITE.
DISPOSAL BY BURNING AND/OR BURYING IS
PROHIBITED. ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND
DEBRIS MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
ANY AND ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES
HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THIS PROJECT.
23.RELOCATE / TRANSPLANT EXISTING PLANT
MATERIAL AS INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS
AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT. MAINTAIN TRANSPLANTED PLANT
MATERIAL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.
24.EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY
SHORED, BRACED AND SHEETED SO THAT
EARTH WILL NOT SETTLE AND SO THAT
EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OF ANY KIND WILL
BE FULLY PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. ANY
DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LACK OF
SHORING, BRACING AND SHEETING SHALL BE
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR
AND SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER.
TREE PRESERVATION
1.PROTECT ALL TREES DESIGNATED TO BE
SAVED AND ALL HARDWOOD TREES 6 INCHES
OR GREATER IN DIAMETER THAT ARE NOT
SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL.
2.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONTACT
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO VISIT SITE AND
VERIFY TREES TO BE SAVED. CONTRACTOR
MUST REVIEW THE DRAWINGS AND DAILY
WORK SCHEDULE SO THAT, SHOULD
PROPOSED GRADES POSE A HAZARD TO A
'TREE TO BE SAVED', THE CONTRACTOR'S
WORK IS NOT IMPEDED AND THERE WILL BE
TIME TO STUDY THE ISSUE.
3.WHERE EXISTING TREES AND/OR SIGNIFICANT
SHRUB MASSINGS ARE FOUND ON SITE,
WHETHER SHOWN ON THE EXISTING
CONDITIONS PLAN OR NOT, THEY SHALL BE
PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE OR UNLESS DIRECTED BY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO BE REMOVED
AND/OR ARE IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED. ANY
QUESTION REGARDING WHETHER PLANT
MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN OR NOT SHALL BE
BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL.
4.ALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED AS INDICATION
ON LANDSCAPE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
REMOVALS PLAN SHALL BE PROTECTED BY 6¶
HEIGHT CHAIN LINK FENCING. THE FENCE
SHALL BE LOCATED AT A MINIMUM AROUND
THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE FOR ALL TREES
(SEE TREE PROTECTION FENCING DETAILS).
THE FENCE SHALL BE FIRMLY ANCHORED
INTO THE GROUND AND SHALL REMAIN
UPRIGHT AND INTACT UNTIL ALL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE.
BARRIER FENCES MAY BE USED TO PROTECT
TREES OUTSIDE OF THE MAIN CONSTRUCTION
AREAS. BARRIER FENCES SHALL CONSIST OF
SAFETY-CAPPED REBAR POSTS PLACED NO
MORE THAN 8 FEET ON CENTER WITH 4 FOOT
HIGH ORANGE SQUARE MESH BARRIER
FENCING, RESINET SLM40, OR EQUAL,
ATTACHED TO POSTS. BARRIER FENCE MUST
BE INSTALLED AT THE LIMITS OF THE
DRIP-LINE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND
MUST NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL FINAL
LANDSCAPING IS TO BE COMPLETED.
5.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OR STORAGE
SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHIN THE TREE
PROTECTED AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL STAKE OR MARK OUT ALL TREE
PROTECTION FENCING LOCATIONS ON SITE
FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON SITE.
6.THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO WATER,
FERTILIZE AND ATTEND TO OTHER
MAINTENANCE NEEDS OF THE EXISTING
TREES AS NEEDED PER THE ARBORIST¶S
RECOMMENDATIONS TO MAINTAIN HEALTHY
GROWTH THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION
PERIOD. PROVIDE 6´ PROTECTIVE LAYER OF
HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL EXISTING
TREES WITHIN CRITICAL WORK AREAS.
SPREAD CHIPS USING HAND TOOLS ONLY,
SUCH AS SHOVELS AND WHEEL BARRELS.
7.WHEN EXCAVATION IS TO OCCUR NEAR A
TREE THAT IS TO BE PROTECTED MUST BE
CARRIED OUT, DAMAGE CAN BE LIMITED BY
ROOT PRUNING. ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE
COMPLETED BEFORE GRADING HAS STARTED
AND SHALL OCCUR BENEATH THE
PROTECTIVE FENCING AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS.
8.ROOT PRUNING FOR PROTECTED TREES
SHALL BE PERFORMED WITH A TRENCHING
MACHINE PRIOR TO ADJACENT EXCAVATION
COMMENCES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
STAKE THE LIMIT OF ROOT PRUNING AS
INDICATED ON THE PLANS. LIMITS OF
TRENCHING SHALL BE APPROVED BY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY
TRENCHING IN THE FIELD. DO NOT TRENCH
FOR IRRIGATION OR ELECTRICAL WITHIN DRIP
LINES OF EXISTING TREES. COORDINATE ALL
TRENCHING REQUIRED FOR UTILITY WORK
WITH LANDSCAPE PLANS.
IF ROOTS OF TREES DESIGNATED TO BE
SAVED ARE EXPOSED, CUT OR OTHERWISE
BROKEN AND DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION
OPERATIONS, THEY MUST BE IMMEDIATELY
AND CLEANLY ROOT PRUNED WITH A SHARP
AXE OR PRUNER. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT OF ANY EXPOSED ROOTS THAT
REQUIRE PRUNING PRIOR TO COMMENCING
WITH WORK. NO ROOTS OVER 3´ IN DIA.
SHALL BE PRUNED WITHOUT REVIEW BY
ARBORIST AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
9.LIMIT SOIL COMPACTION BY LIMIT
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AROUND EXISTING
PRESERVED TREE CRITICAL ROOT ZONES.
THIS INCLUDES RESTRICTING ALL TRAFFIC
AND STORAGE OF MATERIALS FROM UNDER
THESE AREAS.
10.ANY PRUNING OF EXISTING PROTECTED
TREES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A
CERTIFIED ARBORIST AS DIRECTED BY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
SOIL PREPARATION NOTES
1.SOIL PREPARATION IS CRITICAL IN CREATING
A HEALTHY AND LONG-LASTING LANDSCAPE.
REMOVE EXISTING TOPSOIL AND STOCKPILE
ON SITE FOR USE AT A LATER DATE.
2.CONDUCT A SOIL EVALUATION OF EXISTING
STOCKPILED TOPSOIL TO BE USED TO
DETERMINE THE SOILS COMPOSITION,
COMPACTION RATE, NUTRIENT QUALITIES,
ORGANIC CONTENT, PH LEVELS AND WATER
HOLDING CAPABILITIES. THE IDEAL PARTICLE
SOIL MIX IS APPROXIMATELY 45 SAND, 40
SILT, 10 CLAY, AND 5 ORGANIC MATERIALS
WITH A PH LEVEL NEAR SEVEN.
3.PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPE AND
IRRIGATION SYSTEM, CONTRACTOR TO
PREPARE SOIL TO ENSURE A PROPER
ENVIRONMENT FOR PLANT ROOT
DEVELOPMENT.
4.CONTRACTOR TO DECOMPACT SOILS IN
PLANTING AREAS BY ROTO-TILLING, DISC OR
RIPPING SOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12´.
DECOMPACTING OF SMALLER PLANTING
AREAS SUCH AS PARKING AREAS AND
AROUND STRUCTURES, MAY REQUIRE THE
REMOVAL OF COMPACTED SOILS TO A DEPTH
OF 18´ OR MORE AND THEN REPLACEMENT
WITH NEW OR AMENDED SOILS. REMOVAL
ALL DEBRIS 2´ OR GREATER FROM NEW OR
AMENDED SOILS.
5.WHEN PERFORMING SOIL DECOMPACTION,
MULTIPLE PASSES ACROSS THE AREA MAY BE
REQUIRED. WHEN POSSIBLE VARY
DIRECTIONS OF DECOMPACTION TO ENSURE
ADEQUATE COVERAGE. WHEN USING A DISC
OR RIPPING EQUIPMENT, IT IS REQUIRED
THAT THE FINAL PASSES OVER THE ARE BE
MADE WITH A ROTO-TILLER TO BREAK UP ANY
LARGE CLUMPS TO MAKE FINAL GRADING
EASIER.
6.AFTER INITIAL SOIL DECOMPACTION
PROCEDURES ARE PERFORMED, SOIL
AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE ADDED. THE
ADDITION OF SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE
DETERMINED FROM SOIL TESTING
CONDUCTED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH
CONSTRUCTION. SOIL AMENDMENT MAY
INCLUDE INORGANIC MATERIAL SUCH AS
SAND, SILT OR CLAY, WHICH HELP IMPROVE
SOIL TEXTURE. ORGANIC MATERIAL SUCH AS
COMPOST, MANURE, AND PEAT MOSS MAY
ALSO BE USED AND HELP IMPROVE SOIL
STRUCTURE. OTHER AMENDMENTS SUCH AS
FERTILIZER IMPROVE NUTRIENT CONTENT
AND SULFUR ADJUSTS THE SOIL PH LEVEL.
SULFUR SHALL BE INCORPORATED AT THE
RATE OF ONE POUND OF SULFUR PER 100
SQUARE FEET.
7.ALL AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE MIXED
THOROUGHLY WITH EXISTING SOIL. AN
ADDITIONAL SOIL TEST SHALL BE TAKEN TO
ENSURE PROPER SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO
PLANTING.
8.DURING THE REMAINDER OF THE LANDSCAPE
INSTALLATION, VARIOUS AREAS OF THE SITE
MAY BE RE-COMPACTED DUE TO THE USE OF
EQUIPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC.
DECOMPACT ANY AREAS THAT BECOME
RE-COMPACTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF
FINAL LANDSCAPING COMMENCES.
LAYOUT NOTES
1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO
ACCURATELY SURVEY AND LAYOUT THE
PROPOSED WORK FOR CONSTRUCTION. THE
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY
GRADES, LINES, LEVELS, DIMENSIONS PRIOR
TO COMMENCING WITH WORK. NOTED
DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENT OVER SCALED
DIMENSION, LARGER SCALE OVER SMALLER
SCALE, ADDENDA AND CLARIFICATION OVER
PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS.
2.CONTRACTOR TO LAY OUT PROPOSED
LOCATIONS FOR ALL HARDSCAPE, WALLS,
AND SITE ELEMENTS AND VERIFY LAYOUT
WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. HARDSCAPE, WALLS AND
SITE ELEMENTS ARE DIMENSIONED ON THE
LAYOUT PLAN. ANY DISCREPANCIES OR
CONFLICTS WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
OR OTHER DRAWINGS SHALL BE REPORTED
TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY
FOR CLARIFICATION AND/OR ADJUSTMENT.
3.FOR DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS,
PROPOSED BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS AND
RELATED WORK, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL
DRAWINGS
4.WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE CALLED AS ³EQUAL,´
SPACE REFERENCED ITEMS EQUALLY,
MEASURED TO CENTERLINE.
5.MEASUREMENTS ARE TO FACE OF BUILDING,
WALL, FIXED SITE ELEMENT, GRID LINE OR
DEFINED PROPERTY LINE IRON / BENCH
MARKS. DIMENSIONS TO CENTER LINE ARE
AS INDICATED.
6.INSTALL INTERSECTING ELEMENTS AT 90
DEGREE ANGLES TO EACH OTHER UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
7.PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS WHERE
CONCRETE FLAT WORK MEETS VERTICAL
STRUCTURES SUCH AS WALLS, CURBS, STEPS
AND BUILDING ELEMENTS.
8.PROPOSED SURFACES SHALL MEET EXISTING
SURFACES WITH A SMOOTH AND
CONTINUOUS TRANSITION AND FLUSH ALONG
ENTIRE EDGE
9.EXPANSION JOINTS IN CONCRETE WALKS
SHALL BE LOCATED NOT MORE THAN TWENTY
FEET (20¶-0´ O.C.) MAXIMUM OR AS INDICATED
ON THE PLANS.
10.VERIFY ALL JOINTING LAYOUTS FOR
CONCRETE IN FIELD PRIOR TO
IMPLEMENTATION. ALL CONTROL JOINTS IN
CONCRETE TO SAW CUT UNLESS APPROVED
BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
11.LAYOUT OF PROPOSED TRAILS TO BE STAKED
OUT BY CONTRACTORS AND APPROVED BY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN FIELD.
GRADING NOTES
1.EXCAVATION, BACKFILL AND COMPACTION
SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
RECOMMENDATIONS.
2.PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE
AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES AT ALL TIMES.
3.ALL DESIGN CONTOURS AND PROPOSED
ELEVATIONS INDICATED ARE TO FINISH
GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCOUNT FOR ALL
IMPORTED SURFACE AND PLANTING
MATERIALS IN DETERMINING EARTHWORK
REQUIREMENTS
5.GRADING OPERATIONS MUST MINIMIZE THE
POTENTIAL FOR EROSION.
6.NO GRADING, STOCKPILING OF MATERIALS,
OR STAGING IS PERMITTED OUTSIDE THE
LIMITS OF WORK.
7.PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADING THE SITE, THE
CONTRACTOR MUST REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL IN
AREAS TO BE DISTURBED AND STOCKPILE ON
SITE FOR FUTURE USE. EXCESS TOPSOIL
MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AFTER
FINISH GRADING AT THE CONTRACTOR'S
EXPENSE.
8.IF THE EARTHWORK FOR THE SITE IS
ANTICIPATED TO PRODUCE AN EXCESS OF
MATERIAL, THE CONTRACTOR MUST REMOVE
ALL EXCESS MATERIAL FROM THE SITE AND
DISPOSE OF IT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S
EXPENSE.
9.NO TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM
SEEDING AND/OR RESTORATION AREAS
WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT.
10.TOPSOIL COMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION
TRAFFIC IN SEEDING AND/ OR RESTORATION
AREAS OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE LOOSENED
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT.
11.COMPOST SHALL BE MECHANICALLY
INTEGRATED INTO THE TOP 6" OF EXISTING
SOIL BY MEANS OF ROTO-TILLING AFTER
CROSS-RIPPING. GROUND COVER &
PERENNIAL BED AREAS SHALL BE AMENDED
AT A RATE OF 8 CUBIC FEET PER THOUSAND
SQUARE FEET OF NITROGEN STABILIZED
ORGANIC AMENDMENT AND 10 LBS. OF
12-12-12 FERTILIZER PER CU. YD.,
ROTO-TILLED TO A DEPTH OF 8". NO MANURE
OR ANIMAL-BASED PRODUCTS SHALL BE
USED FOR ORGANIC AMENDMENTS.
12.THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY DIRECT ON
SITE CHANGES TO THE GRADING TO SUIT
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND TO ACHIEVE
DESIGN INTENT. SUCH CHANGES SHALL BE
DONE AT THE NO INCREASE TO THE PRICE OF
THE CONTRACTED WORK.
13.THE TOPS OF EXISTING MANHOLES, INLET
STRUCTURES AND SANITARY CLEANOUTS
MAY BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY TO MATCH
PROPOSED GRADES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS.
14.STORM WATER ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS ARE
BASED UPON PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL
PLANS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO
AND FOR VERIFYING LOCATIONS ON FINAL
ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
SEEDING NOTES
1.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE WARRANTED
BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF TWO
YEARS AFTER OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY
ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY
OCCUR PRIOR TO THE OWNER'S WRITTEN
ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE CONTRACTOR.
2.SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT
SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED AS STRUCTURE,
HARD SURFACE, PLANTING AREAS OR LAWN.
3.THE SEEDING CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY
THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF THE
PROPOSED SEEDING START DATE A MINIMUM
OF ONE WEEK PRIOR TO SEEDING.
4.METHOD OF SEEDING AND SEEDING RATE
SHALL BE AS LISTED ON SEEDING KEY.
5.NO SEEDING MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL
BE ACCEPTED UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR,
PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR
QUOTATION, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
6.THE SEEDING / RESTORATION CONTRACTOR
SHALL KEEP NEWLY SEEDED AREAS
WATERED FOR A MINIMUM OF 4 WEEKS OR
UNTIL SEED IS 80 ESTABLISHED. SPRING
SEEDING COMPLETED AFTER MAY 15TH MUST
BE WATERED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR AT
LEAST 4 WEEKS, OR UNTIL AUGUST 15TH,
WHICHEVER IS LONGER. THE SEEDING /
RESTORATION CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO
PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A BID FOR
INDIVIDUAL WATERING APPLICATIONS WITHIN
THE TWO YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD FOR
POTENTIAL WATERING DURING UNUSUALLY
DRY PERIODS.
7.EROSION CONTROL MATTING MUST BE USED
ON ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1.
8.SEEDING IN RESTORATION AREAS WILL
FOLLOW PROCEDURES LISTED IN
³RESTORATION NOTES.´
9.EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS REQUIRED IN
RESTORATION AREAS SHALL BE INSTALLED
BY THE SEEDING / RESTORATION
CONTRACTOR.
PLANTING NOTES
1.EXACT LOCATION OF PLANT AREAS AND
MATERIALS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE
RIGHT TO ADJUST PLANTINGS TO EXACT
LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD.
2.VERIFY PLANT COUNTS AND SQUARE
FOOTAGES: QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR
REFERENCE ONLY. IF QUANTITIES ON PLANT
LIST DIFFER FROM GRAPHIC INDICATIONS ON
PLANS, THEN THE GREATER NUMBER /
QUANTITY SHALL PREVAIL. CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR QUANTITY TAKE OFFS AND
SHALL PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE OF
PLANTING AREAS AS INDICATED ON
DRAWINGS. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
OF ANY PLANTING DISCREPANCIES.
3.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WARRANTED
BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF ONE
YEAR AFTER OWNER'S WRITTEN
ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR
DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO THE
OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.
4.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE THE
DECOMPACTED SUBGRADE AFTER
DECOMPACTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND
PRIOR TO TOPSOIL PLACEMENT.
5.PROVIDE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL FOR ALL
LAWN TURF AREAS. PROVIDE A MINIMUM
OF12 INCHES OF PLANTING SOIL MIX
CONSISTING OF 1/3 TOPSOIL, 1/3 SAND, AND
1/3 COMPOST IN ALL SHRUB AND PERENNIAL
BEDS. WHERE SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS ARE
GROUPED, CREATE ONE CONTINUOUS
PLANTING BED. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO
APPROVE TOPSOIL PRIOR TO SPREADING.
CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT TESTING
RESULTS AND FERTILIZER
RECOMMENDATIONS.
6.ALL NEW TREE PLANTINGS AND EDGED
PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3 INCH DEPTH
OF DOUBLE- SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH.
ALL NEW EDGED GROUNDCOVER PLANTING
BEDS TO RECEIVE 3 INCH DEPTH OF PINE
BARK MULCH. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO
APPROVE MULCH PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
7.ALL PLANTING BEDS NOT CONTAINED BY
STRUCTURES, CURB, OR PAVING MUST BE
EDGED WITH METAL EDGING (ALUMINUM OR
STEEL).
8.WHERE LAWN / SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES,
FINISHED GRADE OF SOD MUST BE HELD 1
INCH BELOW THE SURFACE ELEVATION OF
THE PAVED SURFACE.
9.SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE
CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED
JOINTS.
10.STAKE ALL PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS IN
FIELD FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
RESERVES RIGHTS TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS
TO LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING.
11.ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE STAKED AS
SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND/OR AS
DIRECTED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
MUST APPROVE ALL STAKING LOCATIONS OF
PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED
AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE
DELIVERY DATE FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL.
12.PAINT OR STRING ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS
AND LOCATIONS IN FIELD FOR LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT APPROVAL. ADJUSTMENT IN
LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL
MAY BE NEEDED IN THE FIELD. SHOULD AN
ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED.
13.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEARLY
IDENTIFIED (COMMON OR LATIN
NOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC TAG WHICH
SHALL NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL.
14.ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL MEET AND
CONFORM TO ³THE AMERICAN STANDARDS
FOR NURSERY STOCK´, ANSI, LATEST
WRITTEN STANDARDS AND CONSTITUTE
MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL
PLANT MATERIAL.
15.AN INSPECTION TO APPROVE PLANT
MATERIAL AT THE NURSERY SHALL OCCUR
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO
PROVIDE 48 HOUR NOTIFICATION TO
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
16.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED
UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL
OR OTHER FERTILIZER AS INDICATED MIXED
IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE
MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.
17.ALL PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER
PLANTING DETAILS.
18.WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES FROM THE
GROUND TO THE FIRST BRANCH. WRAPPING
MATERIAL SHALL BE QUALITY, HEAVY
WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER
MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP
ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL
PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1ST, AND REMOVE ALL
WRAPPING BETWEEN MAY 1ST AND JUNE 1ST,
OR AS INSTRUCTED BY THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT.
19.IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PERCEIVES
ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT
SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS, OR ANY
OTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT
NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT MATERIAL
ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL, OR GUARANTEE,
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING
THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF
THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
20.NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE
ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED
OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE
SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION.
ANY SUBSTITUTION IS REQUIRED TO
APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT.
21.PROVIDE MATCHING FORMS AND SIZES FOR
PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN EACH SPECIES AND
SIZE DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. ALL PLANT
MATERIAL SHALL MEET SIZE AND QUALITY
STANDARDS AS INDICATED IN DOCUMENTS
AND SHALL BE OF TOP QUALITY AND
VIGOROUS HEALTH. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT PLANTS
NOT MEETING THESE STANDARDS.
22.ALIGN AND EQUALLY SPACE PLANTINGS IN
ALL DIRECTIONS AS DESIGNATED ON THE
PLANS.
23.FINISH GRADE OF PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE
1´ BELOW ADJACENT PAVING OR SURFACING
AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
24.ALL TREES PLANTED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC
AND/OR PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS SHALL BE
PRUNED CLEAR OF ALL BRANCHES BETWEEN
GROUND AND A HEIGHT OF EIGHT (8) FEET
FOR THAT PORTION OF THE PLAN LOCATED
OVER THE SIDEWALK AND/OR ROAD.
25.PRUNE NEWLY PLANTED TREES AND SHEAR
NEWLY PLANTED HEDGES AS DIRECTED BY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
26.PROTECT ALL NEW EVERGREEN PLANTINGS
FROM WINTER BURN BY WRAPPING NEW
PLANTINGS WITH BURLAP. MAINTAIN
THROUGHOUT WARRANTY PERIOD.
27.TREE ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED
WHERE TREES ARE PLACED WITHIN 5 FEET OF
EXISTING OR NEW PAVEMENT SURFACES.
THE ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED ON
THE SIDE OF THE TREE PIT CLOSEST TO THE
IMPROVEMENTS. DO NOT ENCLOSE ROOT
BALL FOR TREES WITH ROOT BARRIER.
28.ALL PLANTING AREAS ON SLOPES OVER 4:1
SHALL RECEIVE COCONUT FIBER EROSION
CONTROL NETTING FROM ROLLS. NETTING
SHALL BE #CT-125, AS MANUFACTURED BY
NORTH AMERICAN GREEN (OR EQUAL).
INSTALL AND STAKE PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
29.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN
REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE
INSPECTION UPON COMPLETION OF ALL
PLANTING WORK
30.PLANTING IN SEEDING AND/OR RESTORATION
AREAS WILL FOLLOW PROCEDURES LISTED IN
³SEEDING NOTES´ AND ³RESTORATION
NOTES.´
31.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO
MAINTAIN ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS OF
PROJECT UNTIL SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION
OF PROJECT.
32.AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION ALL PLANT
MATERIAL SHALL BE IN HEALTHY, VIGOROUS
GROWING CONDITION, PLANTED IN FULL
ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
IRRIGATION NOTES
1.IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN / BUILD.
AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE
INSTALLED TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR ALL
PLANTING AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. LOW
VOLUME EQUIPMENT SHALL PROVIDE
SUFFICIENT WATER FOR PLAN GROWTH WITH
A MINIMUM WATER LOSS DUE TO WATER RUN
OFF. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL USE HIGH
QUALITY, AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVES,
CONTROLLERS AND OTHER NECESSARY
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. ALL COMPONENTS
SHALL BE NON-CORROSIVE MATERIALS. ALL
DRIP SYSTEMS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY
FILTERED AND REGULATED PER THE
MANUFACTURER¶S RECOMMENDED DESIGN
PARAMETERS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT
SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL OF SYSTEM
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
2.IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL OPERATE ON
POTABLE WATER, AND THE SYSTEM WILL
HAVE APPROPRIATE BACKFLOW PREVENTION
DEVICES INSTALLED TO PREVENT
CONTAMINATION OF THE POTABLE SOURCE.
3.IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED
AND INSTALLED, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT
POSSIBLE, TO CONSERVE WATER BY USING
THE FOLLOWING DEVICES AND SYSTEMS:
MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATE
TECHNOLOGY ON ROTOR AND SPRAY HEADS
(WHEREVER POSSIBLE), RAIN SENSORS, AND
MULTI-PROGRAM COMPUTERIZED IRRIGATION
CONTROLLERS FEATURING SENSORY INPUT
CAPABILITIES.
4.ALL LAWN, PLANTING AREAS AND NEW TREE
PLANTINGS WITHIN PROPERTY LIMITS MUST
BE IRRIGATED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
NEW SEEDING AND / OR RESTORATION AREAS
TO BE IRRIGATED SEPARATELY AS INDICATED
ON DRAWINGS.
5.ALL NEW PLANTING BEDS, NEW TREE
PLANTINGS, GREEN ROOFS AND CONTAINER
PLANTINGS TO RECEIVE DRIP LINE EMITTER
IRRIGATION. ALL TURF / LAWN, SEEDED AND /
OR RESTORATION AREAS TO RECEIVE
OVERHEAD SPRAY IRRIGATION.
6.PROPOSED IRRIGATION LAYOUTS AND
MATERIAL LISTS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH
BIDS. ACCEPTABLE PRODUCT
MANUFACTURERS INCLUDE RAINBIRD, TORO,
AND NETAFIM. THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER
SHALL BE SIZED TO ACCOMMODATE ALL
PROPOSED ZONES, INCLUDING ANY AREAS
INDICATED AS FUTURE IRRIGATION, AND
SHALL BE FULLY AUTOMATIC WITH A
VOLATILE MEMORY CHIP.
7.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THE
LOCATION OF ALL IRRIGATION SLEEVES. IF
ADDITIONAL SLEEVING IS REQUIRED,
IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT. ONLY TRENCHLESS METHODS
WILL BE APPROVED AFTER PAVING IS
COMPLETED.
8.THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A COMPLETE
IRRIGATION SYSTEM FROM THE POINT OF
CONNECTION AT THE COLD WATER STUB OUT
LINE(S) FROM THE BUILDING. THE STUB
OUT(S) FROM THE BUILDING, THE BACKFLOW
PREVENTER, AND OTHER CODE REQUIRED
PLUMBING ELEMENTS MUST BE PROVIDED BY
A LICENSED MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR.
9.THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL
THE IRRIGATION CONTROL PANEL IN THE
LOCATION INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS OR
AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER / LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT. COORDINATE LOCATION W/
APPLICABLE TRADES.
10.THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MUST
PROVIDE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
MANUALS AND ON-SITE INSTRUCTION TO THE
OWNER IN THE SYSTEM OPERATION. THE
IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE
FOR INITIAL SYSTEM STARTUP,
WINTERIZATION FOR THE FIRST WINTER, AND
STARTUP THE FOLLOWING SPRING.
11.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE
IRRIGATION COVERAGE FOR ALL SEEDING /
RESTORATION AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE
INDICATED.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE WITH SEEDING / RESTORATION
CONTRACTOR REGARDING IRRIGATION
SYSTEM SCHEDULE AND IRRIGATION NEEDS
IN RESTORATION AREAS.
12.ALL SPRAY AND ROTOR HEAD LOCATIONS
SHALL BE STAKED, FLAGGED AND/OR
OTHERWISE CLEARLY MARKED ON THE
GROUND PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
SPRINKLER HEAD STAKING SHALL BE
INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S
REPRESENTATIVE OR THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT BEFORE INSTALLATION. STAKED
LOCATIONS SHALL BE SPACED TO PROVIDE
HEAD-TO-HEAD COVERAGE.
13.SET SPRINKLER HEADS PERPENDICULAR TO
FINISH GRADE OF AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
14.ADJUST IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT FOR
ANY VERTICAL OBSTRUCTIONS OR
INTERFERENCE. DO NOT OVERSPRAY ONTO
WALKS, ROADWAYS, WALLS, FENCES AND /
OR BUILDING STRUCTURES.
15.IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE BASED ON
MINIMUM PRESSURE AND MAXIMUM FLOW
DEMAND. VERIFY WATER PRESSURE BEFORE
START OF CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY
DIFFERENCES IN WATER PRESSURE
READINGS AT IRRIGATION POINT OF
CONNECTION PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH
IMPLEMENTATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
16.IF EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO BE
RETAINED FOR REUSE, CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROPOSE ALL REQUIRED ADDITIONS TO
EXISTING SYSTEM NECESSARY TO OBTAIN
FULL COVERAGE OF ALL LANDSCAPE WORK
AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS AND PROVIDE A
DESIGN BUILD DRAWING IDENTIFYING
EXISTING AND PROPOSED IRRIGATION
SYSTEM COMPONENTS FOR INSTALLATION.
17.PROVIDE AS-BUILT DRAWING OF FINAL
IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO OWNER / LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT FOR THEIR RECORDS. UPON
COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION OF
IRRIGATION SYSTEM, IRRIGATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE
FOLLOWING:
ā ACCURATE AND COMPLETE "AS BUILT"
PLANS OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING
8-1/2"[11" ZONE MAP TO BE PLACED INSIDE
EACH CONTROLLER BOX.
ā A LOG ON ALL WATER WINDOWS, RUN
SCHEDULE TIMES, AND OTHER CHANGES
AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE IRRIGATION
SYSTEM SINCE INSTALLATION.
ā ONE HOUR OF TRAINING TO OWNER ON
IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND CONTROLLER
OPERATION.
ā THREE OF EACH TYPE OF HEAD AND
EMITTER INSTALLED.
ā ONE OF EACH TYPE OF VALVE INSTALLED.
ā REVIEW WINTERIZATION PROCEDURES FOR
IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH OWNERS
REPRESENTATIVE.
SITE LIGHTING NOTES
1.THE LIGHTING PLAN IS INTENDED TO SHOW
THE LOCATIONS AND TYPE OF LUMINAIRE
FIXTURES ONLY. POWER SYSTEMS, CONDUIT,
WIRING, VOLTAGES AND OTHER ELECTRICAL
COMPONENTS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE CONTRACTOR. EXTERIOR LIGHTING
TYPES SHALL CONSIST PRIMARILY OF LOW
VOLTAGE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
2.ALL LANDSCAPE LIGHTING AND THEIR
COMPONENTS SHALL MEET THE UL1838
GOVERNING STANDARDS.
3.CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT OF ANY LIGHTING LOCATIONS
THAT CONFLICT WITH DRAINAGE, UTILITIES
OR OTHER STRUCTURES.
4.COORDINATE PROPOSED POWER SOURCES
FOR ALL SITE LIGHTING ELEMENTS AND THEIR
LOCATIONS.
5.COORDINATE SWITCHING AND CONTROLS
SYSTEMS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING WITH
OWNER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. VERIFY ALL
SWITCH LOCATIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION.
6.INSTALL LIGHT FIXTURES PER
MANUFACTURER¶S RECOMMENDATIONS AND
PER LOCAL, STATE, AND NATIONAL
REGULATIONS.
7.ALL LIGHTING IN PAVEMENT AND HARDSCAPE
TO BE CORE DRILLED. VERIFY FINAL
LOCATIONS IN HARDSCAPE AREAS PRIOR TO
DRILLING..
8.ALL LIGHT POLE BASES SHALL BE DESIGNED
AND SIGNED OFF BY A STRUCTURAL
ENGINEER.
9.ALL ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOXES FOR
EXTERIOR LIGHTS SHALL BE LOCATED IN
PLANTING AREAS OR OTHER DISCRETE
LOCATIONS AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
10.ALL TRANSFORMERS SHOULD BE SIZED TO
ALLOW FOR ANY FUTURE INCREASE IN
SYSTEM LOAD, AS WELL AS THE RESISTIVE
VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH LONGER CABLE
RUN DISTANCES AND THE USE OF VOLTAGE
TAPS GREATER THAN 12-VOLT. INSTALL
TRANSFORMERS PER MANUFACTURER¶S
RECOMMENDATIONS.
11.ALL 120-VOLT ELECTRICAL WORK SHOULD BE
PERFORMED BY A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY LAW.
REFER TO ALL NEC AND ALL LOCAL CODES
FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.
12.ALL EXTERIOR RECEPTACLE BOXES SHOULD
BE G.F.C.I.-PROTECTED FOR USE WITH
TRANSFORMERS THAT UTILIZE A PLUG-IN
CORD. ALL RECEPTACLE BOXES SHOULD
UTILIZE AN ³IN-USE´ OR ³BUBBLE´ TYPE
RECEPTACLE COVER TO PROTECT IT FROM
WATER ENTRY.
13.ALL RECEPTACLES, LOW VOLTAGE
TRANSFORMERS, AND FIXTURES CANNOT BE
LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF ANY WATER
SOURCE THAT WOULD BE NORMALLY
OCCUPIED BY HUMANS.
14.EXTERIOR LIGHTING SYSTEM SHALL
CONNECT TO EITHER PHOTOCELL OR
ASTRONOMICAL TIMER. VERIFY FINAL
LIGHTING CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION.
RESTORATION NOTES
1.ALL EXOTICS, INVASIVE AND UNDESIRED TALL
NATIVE SPECIES TARGETED FOR REMOVAL
WILL BE REMOVED BY HAND OR SPRAYED
WITH APPROVED HERBICIDE. THIS WORK
SHALL BEGIN DURING THE FIRST STAGES OF
CONSTRUCTION AND EXTEND THROUGH THE
MANAGEMENT PERIOD.
2.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE
MANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF NATIVE SPECIES
TO BE LEFT AND MANAGED ON SITE.
3.RESTORATION PLANTING AND SEEDING SHALL
BEGIN AFTER ALL CONSTRUCTION AND TREE
PLANTING WORK IS COMPLETE AND THE
IRRIGATION SYSTEM INSTALLED BY OTHERS
IS IN PLACE.
4.RESTORATION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF THE
PLANTING AND SEEDING START DATE A
MINIMUM OF ONE WEEK PRIOR TO SEEDING
AND PLANTING.
5.SALVAGED TOPSOIL APPROVED BY THE
RESTORATION CONTRACTOR WILL BE
SPREAD ONLY ON AREAS CLEARED OF
TOPSOIL DURING CONSTRUCTION.
APPROVED TOPSOIL WILL ONLY BE SPREAD
TO THE ORIGINAL GRADE OR GRADE
APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
6.SEVERELY COMPACTED SOIL CAUSED BY
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL BE
LOOSENED TO ORIGINAL GRADE BY OTHERS.
MINOR COMPACTION SHALL BE LOOSENED BY
RESTORATION CONTRACTOR TO ORIGINAL
GRADE OR GRADE APPROVED BY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
7.SEEDING SHALL BE HAND BROADCAST AND
RAKED EITHER BY HAND OR WITH A DRAG
HARROW.
8.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WARRANTED
BY THE RESTORATION CONTRACTOR FOR A
PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER OWNER'S
WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF
VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR
PRIOR TO THE OWNER'S WRITTEN
ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE CONTRACTOR.
9.SEEDED AND SODDED AREAS SHALL BE
WATERED WITH THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM
(INSTALLED BY OTHERS) FOR A MINIMUM OF
FOUR WEEKS OR UNTIL SEED IS
ESTABLISHED. ALL WATERING ASSUMES A
SYSTEM COVERING ALL RESTORATION AREAS
IS IN PLACE AND RESTORATION CONTRACTOR
HAS CONTROL OVER WATERING SCHEDULE
FOR RESTORATION AREAS.
10.PLANTINGS SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDING TO
SPECIFIC ZONE SECTION NEEDS AND NOT
ACCORDING TO A FIXED PATTERN.
ON-CENTER GOALS ARE ON AVERAGE.
11.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE ALL
SEEDING LOCATIONS PRIOR TO SEEDING.
12.NO FERTILIZER OR SOIL AMENDMENTS ARE
REQUIRED IN THE RESTORATION AREAS
UNLESS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE
RESTORATION CONTRACTOR.
13.RESTORATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE
A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER
ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION UPON
COMPLETION OF ALL RESTORATION SEEDING
AND PLANTING WORK.
WARRANTY
1.ALL HARDSCAPE AND PAVING AREAS TO BE
WARRANTED FOR 1 YEAR AFTER OWNER
ACCEPTANCE.
2.ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE WARRANTED FOR
1 YEAR AFTER OWNER ACCEPTANCE. AN
INSPECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL WILL
OCCUR AFTER THE FIRST YEAR FOLLOWING
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION / OWNER
ACCEPTANCE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
SHALL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTORS OF
INSPECTION DATE. REPLACEMENTS MAY BE
REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. REPLACEMENTS
SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM
THE DATE OF INSPECTION UNLESS
OTHERWISE DIRECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
ACCEPTED HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES.
LANDSCAPE STRUCTURAL NOTES
1.BUILDING CODE: CONFORM TO LATEST
EDITION OF STATE BUILDING CODE AND
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC).
2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS AND
METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FOR THE
SAFETY OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
COMPLYING WITH ALL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
AND REGULATIONS DURING THE WORK. THE
ENGINEER WILL NOT ADVISE ON NOR ISSUE
DIRECTION AS TO SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND
PROGRAMS.
3.THE DRAWINGS HEREIN REPRESENT THE
FINISHED STRUCTURE. DURING ERECTION OF
THE STRUCTURE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY
SHORING, BRACING, FORMING, ETC. TO HOLD
THE STRUCTURE IN PROPER ALIGNMENT AND
TO WITHSTAND ALL LOADS TO WHICH THE
STRUCTURE MAY BE SUBJECTED. SUCH
MEASURES SHALL BE LEFT IN PLACE AS LONG
AS REQUIRED FOR SAFETY AND UNTIL ALL
FRAMING AND CONNECTIONS ARE IN PLACE.
4.FOOTINGS AND SOIL DATA:
4.1.SOIL PARAMETERS ARE ASSUMED FOR
THE DESIGN OF THE RETAINING WALLS
FOR THE FOLLOWING:
4.1.a.MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOIL
BEARING CAPACITY = 2000 PSF.
4.1.E.LATERAL SOIL PRESSURES
(EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSURE) 45
PCF.
4.2.FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON NATURAL
UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ON COMPACTED,
ENGINEERED FILL. ALL SUBGRADE
SHALL BE PREPARED AND COMPACTED
ACCORDING TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS
PROVIDED BY A GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER.
5.ALL TOPSOIL, FILL AND OTHER UNSUITABLE
BEARING MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED. A
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL INSPECT
THE EXCAVATED AREA TO ENSURE ALL
MATERIALS REQUIRING REMOVAL HAVE BEEN
REMOVED AND TO VERIFY THE SOIL BEARING
CAPACITY USED FOR DESIGN PRIOR TO
CONCRETE PLACEMENT.
6.EMBEDMENT DEPTH FROM EXTERIOR GRADE
TO BOTTOM OF FOOTING SHALL NOT BE LESS
THAN 5¶-0´. BOTTOM OF FOOTING ELEVATION
SHALL BE LOWERED AS REQUIRED TO MEET
THIS MINIMUM.
7.ALL RETAINING WALLS SHALL HAVE A
MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES OF FREE-DRAINING
GRANULAR BACKFILL, FULL HEIGHT OF WALL,
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROVIDE
CONTROL JOINTS IN RETAINING WALLS AT
APPROXIMATELY EQUAL INTERVALS NOT TO
EXCEED 40 FEET OR 3 TIMES THE WALL
HEIGHT. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS AT
EVERY FOURTH CONTROL JOINT UNLESS
OTHERWISE INDICATED.
8.MUD SLABS, FOOTINGS OR SLABS SHALL NOT
BE PLACED ONTO OR AGAINST SUBGRADE
CONTAINING FREE WATER, FROST OR ICE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY
PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT ANY FROST OR
ICE FROM PENETRATING ANY FOOTING OR
SLAB SUBGRADE BEFORE AND AFTER
PLACING CONCRETE UNTIL SUCH SUBGRADES
ARE FULLY PROTECTED BY THE PERMANENT
BUILDING STRUCTURE OR PROPER DEPTH OF
BURY.
9.DO NOT UNDERMINE EXISTING FOUNDATIONS.
10.REINFORCED CONCRETE:
10.1.DESIGN CODE: USE BUILDING CODE
REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL
CONCRETE (ACI 318), LATEST ADOPTION
10.2.CONCRETE MIXES SHALL BE DESIGNED
PER ACI 301 USING THE FOLLOWING
PARAMETERS:
10.2.a.PORTLAND CEMENT CONFORMING
TO ASTM C150 OR C595.
10.2.E.AGGREGATE CONFORMING TO ASTM
C33.
10.2.c.ADMIXTURES CONFORMING TO
ASTM C494, C1017, AND C260. DO
NOT USE CALCIUM CHLORIDE OR
ADMIXTURES CONTAINING CALCIUM
CHLORIDE.
10.2.G.CONCRETE SHALL BE READY-MIXED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C94.
11.REINFORCING STEEL
11.1.BARS -ASTM A615, GR. 60
11.2.PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE AND
REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ACI AND CRSI
STANDARDS.
11.3.DO NOT FIELD BEND BARS PARTIALLY
EMBEDDED IN HARDENED CONCRETE
UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OR
ACCEPTED BY THE ENGINEER.
11.4.PROVIDE CORNER BARS EQUAL IN SIZE
AND SPACING TO WALL HORIZONTAL
REINFORCEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE
DETAILED.
12.COLD WEATHER CONCRETING SHALL FOLLOW
PROCEDURES IN ACI 306.
13.HOT WEATHER CONCRETING SHALL FOLLOW
PROCEDURES IN ACI 305.
14.PROVIDE 32 BAR DIAMETER LAP LENGTHS
FOR WALL FOOTINGS UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE. FOR OTHER LAP LENGTHS
PROVIDE CLASS B LAP SPLICES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318.
15.BAR SUPPORTS AND HOLDING BARS SHALL BE
PROVIDED FOR ALL REINFORCING STEEL TO
ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM
CONCRETE COVER. BAR SUPPORTS SHALL BE
PLASTIC, PLASTIC TIPPED, EPOXY COATED OR
STAINLESS STEEL FOR UNCOATED STEEL.
BAR SUPPORTS FOR COATED STEEL SHALL BE
PLASTIC, PLASTIC COATED OR EPOXY
COATED.
16.CONCRETE MIX DESIGN(S) SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO ENGINEER/ARCHITECT FOR
REVIEW.
17.PROVIDE REINFORCING STEEL SHOP
DRAWINGS TO ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW / APPROVAL.
18.MATERIAL STRENGTHS:
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION NOTES
DESCRIPTION
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH (fc)
AT 28 DAYS
MAX
AGGREGAT
E SIZE
SLUMP
MAX WATER
TO CEMENT
RATIOS
(W/C)3/
FOOTINGS 3,000 PSI 1 1/2"4" ± 1"0.57
RETAINING
WALLS (5
AIR
ENTRAINED)
4,000 PSI 3/4"4" ± 1"0.45
1 / TOLERANCE ON AIR CONTENT AS DELIVERED
SHALL BE ± 1.5
2/ PRIOR TO THE ADDITION OF PLASTICIZER OR
HIGH-RANGE WATER-REDUCER
1 / TOLERANCE ON AIR CONTENT AS DELIVERED
SHALL BE ± 1.5creation Gate:11/19/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L001.GZJOast saveG:EretZieseOer DecePEer 4, 2020 11:14 AMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
HORS
E
S
H
O
E
C
U
R
V
E
6609
H
O
R
S
E
S
H
O
E
C
U
R
V
E
LOTUS LAKE
EXISTING INCOMING SURVEY1 L009
EXISTING INCOMING SURVEY
N
1" = 16'
SCALE: 1 incK =
0 16'32'8'
16 feet
creation Gate:11/19/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L009.GZJOast saveG:EretZieseOer DecePEer 4, 2020 11:28 AMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
NOTE:
GENERAL NOTES
1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.
3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,
AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/
PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON
SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND
WALLS.4.REFER TO SHEET L010, EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR
BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION
STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND
SURVEYOR
5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS
ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.
6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT
DISCREPANCIES.
7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND
APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON
REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.
KEYNOTES
1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND
PROTECT
2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE -
SAVE AND PROTECT
3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,
REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS
4.EXISTING DOCK BY OWNER, REORIENT TO ALIGN WITH
PATH, STAIRS
5.FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING LAKESIDE PAVING AND DECK
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
EXISTING GARAGE
REFER TO ARCH
936.33
HORSESHOE CURVE
LOTUS LAKE
O.H.W.: 896.30PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE5' SIDE YARD SETBACKTRAFFIC FLOW
TRAFFIC FLOW
PROPERTY LINE
5' SIDE YARD SETBACKNEIGHBORING
STRUCTURE
NEIGHBORING
STRUCTURE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
10' FRONT YARD SETBACK
DN926.90
BFFE
EXISTING
PORCH
ABOVE
EXISTING HOUSE
937.08
FFE
REFER TO ARCH
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
4
10' OH
W
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
5
5
-1R
-1R
-2R
-2R
-2R
-2R
-3R
-4R
-5R
-5R
-2R
-5R
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN1 L010
EXISTING CONDITIONS ANDREMOVALS PLAN
N
1" = 16'
SCALE: 1 incK =
0 16'32'8'
16 feet
REMOVALS KEY
R1 EXISTING BITUMINOUS DRIVE TO BE REMOVED
R2 EXISTING SITE WALL TO BE REMOVED
R3 EXISTING PAVING TO BE REMOVED
R4 EXISTING DECK TO BE RECONFIGURED AND REALIGNED
R5 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED
-R
creation Gate:11/19/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L010.GZJOast saveG:EretZieseOer DecePEer 4, 2020 11:33 AMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
NOTE:
GENERAL NOTES
1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.
3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,
AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/
PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON
SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND
WALLS.4.REFER TO SHEET L010, EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR
BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION
STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND
SURVEYOR
5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS
ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.
6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT
DISCREPANCIES.
7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND
APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON
REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.
KEYNOTES
1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND
PROTECT
2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE -
SAVE AND PROTECT
3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,
REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS
4.EXISTING DOCK BY OWNER, REORIENT TO ALIGN WITH
PATH, STAIRS
5.FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING LAKESIDE PAVING AND DECK
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
5' SIDE YARD SETBACK5' SIDE YARD SETBACK1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
10' FRONT YARD SETBACK
DN4
10' OH
W
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
5
5
OVERLAY DIAGRAM1 L011
OVERLAY DIAGRAM
N
1" = 16'
SCALE: 1 incK =
0 16'32'8'
16 feet
EXISTING HARDCOVER
EXISTING HOUSE 2,985 s.f.
EXISTING DRIVEWAY 2,684 s.f.
EXISTING PAVING 305 s.f.
EXISTING WALLS 403 s.f.
AREA OF PROPERTY 27,878
s.f.
EXISTING HARDCOVER AREA 6,377 s.f.
EXISTING HARDCOVER 23
HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY
CODE 25
PROPOSED HARDCOVER
EXISTING HOUSE 2,985 s.f.
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY AUTOCOURT 2,550 s.f.
PROPOSED AGGREGATE EDGING 178 s.f.
AREA OF PROPERTY 27,878
s.f.
PROPOSED HARDCOVER AREA 5,713 s.f.
PROPOSED HARDCOVER 21
HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY
CODE 25creation Gate:11/19/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L011.GZJOast saveG:EretZieseOer DecePEer 4, 2020 11:34 AMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
NOTE:
GENERAL NOTES
1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.
3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,
AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/
PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON
SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND
WALLS.4.REFER TO SHEET L010, EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR
BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION
STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND
SURVEYOR
5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS
ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.
6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT
DISCREPANCIES.
7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND
APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON
REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.
KEYNOTES
1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND
PROTECT
2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE -
SAVE AND PROTECT
3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,
REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS
4.EXISTING DOCK BY OWNER, REORIENT TO ALIGN WITH
PATH, STAIRS
5.FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING LAKESIDE PAVING AND DECK
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
EXISTING GARAGE
REFER TO ARCH
936.33
HORSESHOE CURVE
LOTUS LAKE
O.H.W.: 896.30PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE5' SIDE YARD SETBACKTRAFFIC FLOW
TRAFFIC FLOW
PROPERTY LINE
5' SIDE YARD SETBACKW.W
NEIGHBORING
STRUCTURE
NEIGHBORING
STRUCTURE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
10' FRONT YARD SETBACK
DN926.90
BFFE
EXISTING
PORCH
ABOVE
EXISTING HOUSE
937.08
FFE
REFER TO ARCH
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
4
10' OH
W
S
E
T
B
A
C
KPOBDN DN
DN
DN DN
DN
DN
5
5
40'-6"12'49'-10"12'8'-8"2'
3'
12'-7"4'4'-6"TYP.2'TYP.11'-7"
6'-9"12'6 EQ.6'
37'
13'
R6'R6'2'13'R12'ALGNALGN1'1
1
2 2
6'6'4'41'4'3', TYP.11 SP. EQ.4'
4'86'-6"3
6 EQ.36'77'-3"12 EQ.1', TYP.9', TYP.2 EQ.19'12'63'-5"ALGN
3'-3"11'20'-6"
PROPERTY LINE
OHW ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
SITE PLAN1 L101
SITE PLAN
1" = 16'
SCALE: 1 incK =
0 16'32'8'
16 feet
SHEET NOTES
1.REPLACE CURB-CUT FOR EXISTING DRIVE APRON
2.INSTALL NEW CURB CUT FOR DRIVEWAY PER CITY
STANDARDS
3.SLOT DRAIN @ GARAGE THRESHOLD
CONTOUR ELEVATIONXXX
POB POINT OF BEGINNING
PROPOSED CONTOURSXXX
EXISTING CONTOURSXX
X
TRAFFIC
FLOW TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW
EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED
AND PROTECTED
DECID.CONIF.ORNM.
PROPOSED NEW TREE
DECID.CONIF.ORNM.
SETBACK
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION000.00X
LEGEND
N
creation Gate:12/4/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L101.GZJOast saveG:EretZieseOer DecePEer 4, 2020 11:34 AMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
NOTE:
GENERAL NOTES
1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.
3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,
AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/
PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON
SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND
WALLS.4.REFER TO SHEET L010, EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR
BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION
STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND
SURVEYOR
5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS
ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.
6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT
DISCREPANCIES.
7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND
APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON
REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.
KEYNOTES
1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND
PROTECT
2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE -
SAVE AND PROTECT
3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,
REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS
4.EXISTING DOCK BY OWNER, REORIENT TO ALIGN WITH
PATH, STAIRS
5.FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING LAKESIDE PAVING AND DECK
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
CB
CB CB
CB CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
EXISTING GARAGE
REFER TO ARCH
936.33
HORSESHOE CURVE
LOTUS LAKE
O.H.W.: 896.30PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE5' SIDE YARD SETBACKTRAFFIC FLOW
TRAFFIC FLOW
PROPERTY LINE
5' SIDE YARD SETBACKW.W
NEIGHBORING
STRUCTURE
NEIGHBORING
STRUCTURE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
P.E.
10' FRONT YARD SETBACK
1.50
2.42
2
:
1 19DN926.90
BFFE
EXISTING
PORCH
ABOVE
EXISTING HOUSE
937.08
FFE
REFER TO ARCH
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
4
10' OH
W
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
CB
DN DN
DN
DN DN
DN
DN
927928930932926
925
931934933935936937938939953
952
952
951
950
949
948
947
946
945
944
943
942
941
940
939
926
924
922
920
918
916929926.75
924.58
BOS
933.50
TOW
936.92
TOS
929.33
BOW
935.00
TOS
927.75
BOS
900.00
TOD
5
5
926.75
936.33
RIM
931.00
BOW
933.00
BOW
934.50
TOW 926.75
TOS
926.75
933.00
BOW
931.50
TOW
935.50
936.33
938.50
935.50
926.75 926.75
926.17
BOS
926.17
BOS
926.17
BOS
924.50
TOS
922.75
TOS
921.00
TOS
925.75
RIM
925.75
RIM
925.75
RIM
925.75
RIM
925.75
RIM
926.75
RIM
936.33
RIM
917.50
TOS
919.25
TOS
908.33
TOS
915.75
TOS
914.00
TOS
912.25
TOS
910.50
TOS
908.75
TOS
907.00
TOS
905.25
TOS
903.50
TOS
901.75
TOS
4
4
4
4
BEYOND
BEYOND
2
1
1
3
1
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN1 L201
GRADING AND DRAINAGEPLAN
N
1" = 16'
SCALE: 1 incK =
0 16'32'8'
16 feet
PROPERTY LINE
OHW ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
CONTOUR ELEVATIONXXX
SLOPE-AT-SURFACE/DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWX.XX
POB POINT OF BEGINNING
DRAIN TILE
PROPOSED CONTOURSXXX
XX
X EXISTING CONTOURS
NEW PERENNIAL/ANNUAL
PERENNIAL GRASS
POINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDING
TRAFFIC
FLOW TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW
EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED
AND PROTECTED
DECID.CONIF.ORNM.
PROPOSED NEW TREE
DECID.CONIF.ORNM.
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONXXX.XX
LOCN
SETBACK
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION000.00X
STAIRDN
UP
LEGEND
SHEET NOTES
1.12" NDS CATCH BASIN
2.SLOT DRAIN
3.POP-UP EMITTER
4.DRAIN TILE, TYPICAL
CB RD AD CATCH BASIN, ROOF DRAIN, OR AREA DRAIN
creation Gate:11/19/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L201.GZJOast saveG:EretZieseOer DecePEer 4, 2020 11:37 AMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
NOTE:
GENERAL NOTES
1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.
3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,
AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/
PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON
SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND
WALLS.4.REFER TO SHEET L010, EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR
BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION
STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND
SURVEYOR
5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS
ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.
6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT
DISCREPANCIES.
7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND
APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON
REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.
KEYNOTES
1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND
PROTECT
2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE -
SAVE AND PROTECT
3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,
REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS
4.EXISTING DOCK BY OWNER, REORIENT TO ALIGN WITH
PATH, STAIRS
5.FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING LAKESIDE PAVING AND DECK
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
EXISTING GARAGE
REFER TO ARCH
936.33
HORSESHOE CURVE
LOTUS LAKE
O.H.W.: 896.30PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE5' SIDE YARD SETBACKTRAFFIC FLOW
TRAFFIC FLOW
PROPERTY LINE
5' SIDE YARD SETBACKW.W
NEIGHBORING
STRUCTURE
NEIGHBORING
STRUCTURE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
10' FRONT YARD SETBACK
DN926.90
BFFE
EXISTING
PORCH
ABOVE
EXISTING HOUSE
937.08
FFE
REFER TO ARCH
TYP.
TYP.
TYP.
4
10' OH
W
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
DN DN
DN
DN DN
DN
DN
5
5
13
PM
1
PM
G
1
G
1
36
EQ
1
1
1
2
L608
7L608LANDSCAPE PLAN1 L401
LANDSCAPE PLAN
N
1" = 16'
SCALE: 1 incK =
0 16'32'8'
16 feet
PROPERTY LINE
OHW ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
SHEET NOTES
1.4' MOWED PATH, TYPICAL
CONTOUR ELEVATIONXXX
POB POINT OF BEGINNING
PROPOSED CONTOURSXXX
XX
X EXISTING CONTOURS
POINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDING
TRAFFIC
FLOW TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW
EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED
AND PROTECTED
DECID.CONIF.ORNM.
PROPOSED NEW TREE
DECID.CONIF.ORNM.
SETBACK
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION000.00X
STAIRDN
UP
LEGEND
PLANT SCHEDULE
TREES
KEY NAME QTY SIZE
PM PseXGotsXJa Pen]eisii
DOUGLAS FIR 14 EA.14' (H) BB
PERENNIALS
KEY NAME QTY SIZE
EQ ETXisetXP
HORSETAIL 36 EA.#4 CONT.
TURF, GROUND COVERS, AND SEED MIXES
HATCH KEY NAME QTY SIZE
TAG
QTY
G1 NOW-MOW 21,810 s.f.N/AFESCUE
creation Gate:12/4/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L401.GZJOast saveG:EretZieseOer DecePEer 4, 2020 12:36 PMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
NOTE:
GENERAL NOTES
1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.
3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,
AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/
PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON
SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND
WALLS.4.REFER TO SHEET L010, EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR
BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION
STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND
SURVEYOR
5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS
ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.
6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT
DISCREPANCIES.
7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND
APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON
REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.
KEYNOTES
1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND
PROTECT
2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE -
SAVE AND PROTECT
3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,
REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS
4.EXISTING DOCK BY OWNER, REORIENT TO ALIGN WITH
PATH, STAIRS
5.FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING LAKESIDE PAVING AND DECK
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
L501
WALL ELEVATIONS
1" = 16'
940' 0"
935' 0"
930' 0"
925' 0"
933.50
TOW 6"940' 0"
935' 0"
930' 0"
925' 0"
933.50
TOW
940' 0"
935' 0"
930' 0"
925' 0"
933.50
TOW6"2'-6"6"931.50
TOW931.00
BOW
933.00
TOW
WALL RETURNS BEYOND
C.I.P. CONCRETE WALL
FACE OF BUILDING
DECK ABOVE -
SEE ARCH. DWGS.
FINISHED GRADE BEYOND
WALL RETURNS
BEYOND
DECK ABOVE - SEE ARCH. DWGS.
FINISHED
GRADE
BEYOND
C.I.P. CONCRETE WALL
931.00
BOW
1L601WALL RETURNS BEYOND
C.I.P. CONCRETE WALL
FACE OF BUILDING
DECK ABOVE -
SEE ARCH. DWGS.
FINISHED GRADE BEYOND
SCALE:1/2" = 1'-0"
WALL 1 - NORTH FACING ELEVATION1 SCALE:1/2" = 1'-0"
WALL 1 - WEST FACING ELEVATION2 SCALE:1/2" = 1'-0"
WALL 1 - SOUTH FACING ELEVATION3
creation Gate:11/19/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L501.GZJOast saveG:GanieOOeMXricKNo NovePEer 19, 2020 8:11 PMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
L601
WALL, STAIR, AND SURFACINGDETAILS
1" = 16'
1/2" PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT
#3 SMOOTH BAR DOWELS 12" O.C.
CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE AS
SPECIFIED - SEE SURFACING PLAN FOR
FINISH
1/4" X 3/4" HAND TOOLED CONTROL
JOINT. SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR
JOINTING.
CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED
- SEE SURFACING PLAN FOR FINISH.
1/4" X 3/4" HAND TOOLED CONTROL
JOINT. SEE LAYOUT PLAN ON SHEET L5
FOR JOINTING.
CONSTRUCTION JOINT AS SPECIFIED
AND NEEDED.
CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE AS
SPECIFIED - SEE SURFACING PLAN
FOR FINISH.
1/2" PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT.
SILICONE JOINT W/ 1
2"Ø BACKER ROD
CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE AS
SPECIFIED - SEE SURFACING PLAN FOR
FINISH.
EXPANSION JOINT
CONTROL JOINT
CONSTRUCTION JOINT
SILICON EXPANSION JOINT1"1
2"
1
8"3/4"1
8"3/4"1
2"VARIESVARIESVARIESVARIESSCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
CONCRETE SURFACING @ PLANTING BED7 SCALE:N/A
CONCRETE JOINTING, TYPICAL8 SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
AGGREGATE SURFACING, TYPICAL9
TOP OF PAVING
ELEVATION VARIES
C.I.P. CONCRETE SURFACING
W/ 6 [ 6 W.W. MESH. EXPOSED
FINISH. SEE PLANS FOR
JOINTING. EXPANSION JOINTS
AS NEEDED.5"118"6" MIN.1'1"COMPACTED, CRUSHED
AGGREGATE BASE,
COMPACT TO 98 SPD
COMPACTED OR
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE, AS
RECOMMENDED BY
GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER.
EXTEND BASE BEYOND
EXTENTS OF UNIT
PAVERS. 6" MIN.
SNOW MELT SYSTEM,
SEE MECH. DWGS.5"118"6" MIN.1'1"TOP OF PAVING
ELEVATION VARIES
C.I.P. CONCRETE
SURFACING
COMPACTED, CRUSHED
AGGREGATE BASE,
COMPACT TO 98 SPD
COMPACTED OR
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE, AS
RECOMMENDED BY
GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER.
EXTEND BASE BEYOND
EXTENTS OF UNIT
PAVERS.12" MIN.
LOOSENED AND
AMENDED PLANTING
SOIL AS SPECIFIED.
VEGETATED AREA
AS SPECIFIED.
GEOFABRIC TYP.
SNOW MELT SYSTEM,
SEE MECH. DWGS.
TOP OF PAVING
ELEVATION VARIES
ALL JOINTS ARE TO BE SAW CUT
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
JOINTS SHALL BE STRAIGHT,
CLEAN AND NEAT. STONE
VENEER, SEE L102, L700
C.I.P. CONCRETE SURFACING
W/ #4 BAR @ 12"O.C. EW. SEE
PLANS FOR JOINTING.
EXPANSION JOINTS AS
NEEDED.
COMPACTED, CRUSHED
AGGREGATE BASE, COMPACT
TO 98 SPD
COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE, AS RECOMMENDED
BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.5"1'GEOFABRIC TYP.
SNOW MELT SYSTEM, SEE
MECH. DWGS.
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
CONCRETE SURFACING @ DRIVEWAY AND AUTOCOURT5
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
CONCRETE SURFACING @ LAWN6
AGGREGATE SURFACING
8"3"GEOFABRIC UNDERNEATH, TYP.
COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE AS RECOMMENDED BY
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
TOP OF PAVING
ELEVATION VARIES
1' , TYP.7"TYP.5/4[6 IPE DECKING, TYP.T.O.S.
SEE PLAN
3'-3" O.C., TYP.3'-3" O.C., TYP.
4'-01
2"
1
2" GAP., TYP.
2[6 P.T. JOIST @ 16" O.C., TYP.2" MIN.HELICAL PIER TO FROST, TYP.
2[12 P.T. STAIR STRINGER, TYP.
5/4[6 IPE DECKING ON TREAD AND RISER, TYP.
2[6 P.T. SLEEPER, TYP.
FINISHED GRADE BEYOND
1', TYP.2' TYP.2'-6" MAX.SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
WOOD STAIRCASE SECTION, TYPICAL34'-4"8"
1'-3"9"4'TO FROST929.33 6" MIN.VARIESBOW VARIES
SEE PLANS
933.50
TOW
C.I.P. CONCRETE WALL W/
BOARD FORM FINISH
SURFACING AS
SPECIFIED - SEE PLANS
COMPACTED
GRANULAR BACKFILL -
WRAP W/ GEO-FABRIC
COMPACTED GRANULAR
BACKFILL- WRAP W/
GEO-FABRIC
#5 VERT @ 12" O.C.
#5 HORZ @ 12" O.C.
4" DIA. CORRUGATED PVC
DRAINTILE WITH SLEEVE.
DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT. (VERIFY
DAYLIGHT LOCATIONS IN
FIELD)
REINFORCED CONCRETE
SPREAD FOOTING
#4 @ 12" O.C. EA WAY, TOP
AND BOTTOM
COMPACTED OR
UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE
GEOFABRIC, TYP.
INFILL SOILS, COMPACT PER
ENGINEER REQUIREMENTS
COMPACTED GRANULAR
BACKFILL - WRAP W/
GEO-FABRIC
GEOFABRIC, TYP.
INFILL SOILS, COMPACT
PER ENGINEER
REQUIREMENTS
AGGREGATE
SURFACING
GEOFABRIC
UNDERNEATH, TYP.
OUTSIDE EDGE OF
HOUSE AND WINDOW
CASING- V.I.F.3"8"2 MIN.
CATCH BASIN. DRAIN TO
DAYLIGHT. (VERIFY DAYLIGHT
LOCATIONS IN FIELD)
WALL RETURN BEYOND 7"TYP.314"6"8"1'
BURY BELOW GRADE
GEO-FABRIC
UNDERNEATH, TYP.
COMPACTED OR
UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE
AS RECOMMENDED BY
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
SURFACING BEYOND
- SEE PLANS
COMPACTED CRUSHED
CLASS 5 BASE.
COMPACT TO 100 SPD
SURFACING BEYOND
- SEE PLANS
914"8"ALUMINUM EDGING
1'
T.O.S.
SEE PLAN
2[6 P.T. FRAMING, TYP.
5/4[6 IPE DECKING ON
TREAD AND RISER,
TYP.
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
WOOD LANDSCAPE TREAD - SECTION, TYPICAL2
7", TYP.1', TYP.612"6" MIN.4"6"8"COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE AS RECOMMENDED
BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
1/2" WASHED DRESSER TRAP
ROCK BENEATH DECK EXTENTS
926.75
TOD
924.42
BOS
SURFACING
BEYOND - SEE
PLANS
GEO-FABRIC
UNDERNEATH,
TYP.
COMPACTED
CRUSHED
CLASS 5 BASE -
COMPACT TO
100 SPD
SLOPE
ALUMINUM EDGING
5/4[6 IPE DECKING, TYP.
2[12 P.T. STAIR
STRINGER, TYP.
5/4[6 IPE DECKING
ON TREAD AND
RISER, TYP.
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
DECK STAIRS - SECTION4SCALE:3/4" = 1'-0"
C.I.P. CONC. WINDOW WELL1
creation Gate:12/4/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L601.GZJOast saveG:EretZieseOer DecePEer 4, 2020 12:29 PMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
L602
DRAINAGE AND LIGHTINGDETAILS
1" = 16'
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
SQUARE CATCH BASIN IN PLANTING AREA5
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
POP-UP EMITTER8
NDS POLYOLEFIN POP-UP
DRAINAGE EMITTER - OR
APPROVED EQ.
NDS 1/4 BEND SEWER
DRAIN ELBOW - OR
APPROVED EQ.
SURFACING AS
SPECIFIED - SEE PLANS
COMPACTED TOPSOIL
1
4" LEACH HOLE
DRAIN TILE, TYP.
GRANULAR FILL WHERE
APPLICABLE
UNDISTURBED SUBGRADEVARIES6" MIN.SLOPE TO DRAINSLOPE TO DRAIN
RIM ELEV.
ELEV. VARIES, SEE L2012" MIN.16" DIA. MIN.
COVER TOP OF
CATCH BASIN WITH 2"
OF 2-3" DIA BLACK
MEXICAN BEACH
PEBBLES
GEO FABRIC, TYP.
NDS GALV. STEEL GRATE,
SEE L700
NDS RISER IF REQUIRED
NDS 12" OR 18" SQUARE
CATCH BASIN AS
SPECIFIED
NDS UNIVERSAL OUTLET
INVERT ELEVATION
GRANULAR FILL
GEO FABRIC, TYP.
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
UPLIGHT IN MONOLITHIC STAIR2
TOP OF SURFACING
ELEVATION VARIESSEE MANUFACTURERRECOMMENDATIONUP LIGHT. SEE
MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
SURFACING AS SPECIFIED,
SEE PLANS
FLEXIBLE CONDUIT
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
UPLIGHT IN LPLANTING AREAS3
1" MAX
BOLLARD LIGHT, SEE L103
BOLLARD FLANGE MOUNT TO
CONCRETE PIER, SEE
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
SURFACING BEYOND, SEE L401
FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO LIGHT
FIXTURE.
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
BOLLARD4
FACE OF HOUSE
P.T. 2[6 LEDGER BOARD
CONNECTION @ HOUSE
912"3"3"3"6"
V.I.F.
(2) P.T. 2[6 BEAM, TYP.
5
4"(t) IPE DECKING, TYP.
9" NDS GRATE, GALV. STEEL
GRATE
NDS 9" SQUARE CATCH
BASIN - USE RISERS AS
REQUIRED
NDS UNIVERSAL OUTLET
DRAIN PIPE, CONNECT TO
SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
INVERT ELEVATION
GRANULAR FILL, TYP.
GEOFABRIC, TYP.
HOUSE FOUNDATION
BEYOND - V.I.F.
926.75
RIM
1/2" WASHED DRESSER
TRAP ROCK BENEATH
DECK EXTENTS
SLOPE SLOPE
WRAP W/ GEOFABRIC
DECK FRAMING
ABOVE
9" NDS GRATE, GALV.
STEEL GRATE
NDS 9" SQUARE
CATCH BASIN - USE
RISERS IF REQUIRED
NDS UNIVERSAL
OUTLET
DRAIN PIPE, CONNECT
TO SITE DRAINAGE
SYSTEM
INVERT ELEVATION
GRANULAR FILL, TYP.
GEOFABRIC, TYP.
1/2" WASHED DRESSER
TRAP ROCK BENEATH
DECK EXTENTS
925.75
RIM
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
SQUARE CATCH BASIN BENEATH DECK6 SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
SQAURE CATCH BASIN IN DECK7 SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
SLOT DRAIN @ GARAGE THRESHOLD9
SCALE:NTS
TYPICAL SLOPETAME2 ASSEMBLY AND ANCHORAGE (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)1
SLOPETAME2
UNITS
PLAN SPECIFICATIONS
UNIT SIZE - 50 CM X 50 CM X 2.5 CM
(20" X 20" X 1")
UNIT WEIGHT - 558 GRAMS (19 OZ.)
STRENGTH - 402 KG/CM (5720 PSI)
COLOR - BLACK (STANDARD)
RESIN - 95 POST-CONSUMER
2
OR 2.2 KG (4.8 POUNDS)
RECYCLED HDPE/LDPE
UNITS
FABRIC
WEIGHT - 2.25 OZ./SY( 76.3 GM/M )2
TENSILE - 65 [ 40 LB/FT (585 KG/M )2
8.3 CM (3.3")
2.3 CM (0.9")
6 CM (2.4")
25 CM (9.8")16.7 CM (6.6")
50 CM (19.7")
2.5 CM
15 CM
TYPICAL ANCHOR PIN
FACE OF SLOPE
SLOPE CROSS SECTION
START AT TOP OF SLOPE
WITH HOLES IN UPPER RIGHT
CORNER.
TOP OF SLOPE
FOLD OVER TOP OF SLOPE AND ANCHOR
TYPICAL
ANCHOR PIN
LOCATION
TOE OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPESLOPETAME
2
SLOPETAME2
FABRIC
TOE OF SLOPE
ANCHOR PIN
SLOPETAME2 CROSS-BRACING
AVAILABLE IN 9 STANDARD ROLL SIZES
PLACE ROLLS GOING DOWN THE
SLOPE WITH CROSS-BRACING
RUNNING ACROSS THE SLOPE
1600 JacNson St., SXite 310
GoOGen, CoOoraGo 80401
800-233-1510 OR 303-233-8383
FAX: 303-233-8282
rev. 08/04
InvisiEOe StrXctXres, Inc.
FOR REFERENCE ONLY - SEE MANUFACTURER'S FULL SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
EQ'EQ'
12"
TOP OF CANISTER SHALL BE
FLUSH WITH FINISHED GRADE.
SEE MANF. SPECS.
16" WIDE X 6" THICK MONOLITHIC
STONE STAIR, TYP.
COMPACTED CRUSHED
CLASS 5 BASE. COMPACT
TO 100 SPD.
GEOFABRIC
SLEEVE LIGHTS INTO PVC BASE
FLEXIBLE CONDUIT TO LIGHT
CANISTER
18"7
8"
CAULK JOINT
6"6"5"VERIFY DIMS.
PER MAFR.
SPECS.6"5" THICK CONCRETE
SURFACING W/
SNOW-MET SYSTEM
BRICKSLOT 100 SST.
SLOT DRAIN BY ACO -
OR APPROVED EQ.
C.I.P. CONCRETE
SURROUND W/ (4)
#4 BARS
COMPACTED
CRUSHED AGG.
BASE, COMPACT
TO 98 SPD
GEOFABRIC
COMPACTED OR
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE
GARAGE DOOR - SEE
ARCH. DWGS.
GARAGE THRESHOLD -
V.I.F.
VERIFY DIMS. PER MAFR. SPECS.
EXPANSION JOINT
creation Gate:11/19/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L602.GZJOast saveG:EretZieseOer DecePEer 4, 2020 12:31 PMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
L603
SITE ELEMENT DETAILS
1" = 16'
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"
DECK - SURFACING PLAN2
CB
CB CB CBCB
926.75
926.75
926.17
BOS
926.17
BOS
926.17
BOS55'-5"
1'-3"
O.C.
55'-8"
49'-9"5'-6" O.C.5'-6" O.C.9 SP. EQ.6' O.C.6' O.C.8" O.C.4'-9" O.C.11'-8"24'-512"1"
5'-8"
11
2"
ALGN
6'-8" O.C., TYP.8"5"1'-4"
O.C.
TYP.5'-9"5'-9"5'-3"5'-3"112"1'-4"
O.C.
TYP.
55'-10"12'24'-9"2'ALGN6'
FACE OF HOUSE, TYP. - V.I.F.
P.T. 2[6 LEDGER BOARD
CONNECTION @ HOUSE, TYP.
925.75
RIM
925.75
RIM
925.75
RIM
925.75
RIM
925.75
RIM
P.T. 2[6 RIM JOIST, TYP.
(2) P.T. 2[6 BEAM, TYP.
P.T. 2[6 RIM JOIST, TYP.
HELICAL PIER FOOTING
BEYOND, TYP.
9
L602
10L602CATCH BASIN BEYOND, TYP. -
CONNECT TO SITE DRAINAGE
SYSTEM AND DRAIN TO
DAYLIGHT
FACE OF HOUSE, TYP. - V.I.F.
DECK FRAME BEYOND, TYP.
5/4[6 IPE DECKING, TYP.
5/4[6 IPE SKIRT BOARD ON
ALL EXPOSED EDGES
HELICAL PIER FOOTING
BEYOND, TYP.BBA A
SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"
DECK - FOOTING AND FRAMING PLAN1
SCALE:3/4" = 1'-0"
DECK - SECTION A-A9 SCALE:3/4" = 1'-0"
DECK - SECTION B-B10
SLOPE SLOPE
FACE OF HOUSE
5'-6" O.C.5'-6" O.C.
51
2" , TYP.
1
4" GAP, TYP.
HOUSE FOUNDATION
BEYOND- V.I.F.
HOUSE FOUNDATION
BEYOND- V.I.F.
4'-9" O.C.
5'-3"5'-3"8"
P.T. 2[6 LEDGER BOARD
CONNECTION @ HOUSE
FACE OF HOUSE
P.T. 2[6 LEDGER BOARD
CONNECTION @ HOUSE
926.75
TOD
926.17
BOS
926.75
TOD
926.17
BOS
FINISHED GRADE AS
SPECIFIED - SEE PLANS
HELICAL PIER FOOTING,
TYP. - SIZE AND DEPTH
AS SPEC'D. BY
GEOTECHNICAL ENG.
CATCH BASIN -
CONNECT TO SITE
DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND
DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT
GEOFABRIC, TYP.
COMMERCIAL
LANDSCAPE EDGING
5/4[6 IPE DECKING, TYP.
(2) P.T. 1[6 RIM JOIST
5/4[6 IPE SKIRT BOARD
ON ALL EXPOSED EDGES
(2) P.T. 2[6 BEAM, TYP.
P.T. 2[6 JOIST, TYP.
JOIST HANGER, TYP.
6'3"3"12'
JOIST HANGER, TYP.3"3"5/4[6 IPE DECKING, TYP.
(2) P.T. 1[6 RIM JOIST
5/4[6 IPE SKIRT BOARD
ON ALL EXPOSED EDGES
P.T. 2[6 JOIST, TYP.
(2) P.T. 2[6 BEAM, TYP.
JOIST HANGER, TYP.
COMPACTED OR
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE, AS SPEC'D.
BY GEOTECHNICAL ENG.
SLOPE SLOPE
1/2" WASHED DRESSER
TRAP ROCK BENEATH
DECK EXTENTS
FINISHED GRADE AS
SPECIFIED - SEE PLANS
HELICAL PIER FOOTING,
TYP. - SIZE AND DEPTH
AS SPEC'D. BY
GEOTECHNICAL ENG.
CATCH BASIN -
CONNECT TO SITE
DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND
DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT
GEOFABRIC, TYP.
COMMERCIAL
LANDSCAPE EDGING
COMPACTED OR
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE, AS SPEC'D.
BY GEOTECHNICAL ENG.
1/2" WASHED DRESSER
TRAP ROCK BENEATH
DECK EXTENTS
6
L6026
L602
creation Gate:11/19/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L603.GZJOast saveG:GanieOOeMXricKNo NovePEer 19, 2020 8:10 PMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
L607
PLANTING DETAILS
NTS
2 [ DIA. OF BALL MIN.
REFER TO PLANTING
PLANS FOR QUANTITY
AND SIZE
WRAP AND PROTECT TREES
THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION,
REMOVE TREE WRAPPING
AFTER 1-YEAR WARRANTY
WALK THROUGH
ROOT BALL. REMOVE ALL
WIRE. SCORE ROOT BALL
AND PULL BACK TOP 1
3 OF
BURLAP AND TWINE
SHREDDED HARDWOOD
MULCH. @ 3" DEPTH.
APPROVED
PLANTING SOIL
MIX AS SPECIFIED
4" TOPSOIL MIN,
FINE GRADE AND
SOD
PREPARED OR
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE
NOTES:
1.ALL BARE ROOT PLANTINGS TO FOLLOW NURSERY
BEST PRACTICE STANDARDS
2.SOAK ROOTS IN WATER FOR LEAST ONE HOUR BUT
NOT MORE THAN 24 HOURS PRIOR TO PLANTING.
3.SCARIFY ROOTS AND THE BOTTOM OF THE HOLE.
4.APPLY CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF BRANCHES AND
ROOTS IF NECESSARY.
5.TRANSFER PLANT DIRECTLY FROM WATER TO
HOLE. SET PLANT SO ROOT FLARE IS AT THE
FINISHED SOIL ELEVATION.
6.WATER THOUROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO
SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS
7.BACKFILL VOIDS AND WATER A SECOND TIME
8.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 4 HOURS OF THE SECOND
WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.
9.REFER TO IRRIGATION PLANS FOR IRRIGATION
INFORMATION.
6" MIN.
2 [ DIA. OF BALL MIN.
SHREDDED
HARDWOOD MULCH
@ 3" DEPTH.
APPROVED
PLANTING SOIL
MIX AS SPECIFIED
4" TOPSOIL MIN,
FINE GRADE AND
SOD
PREPARED OR
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE
REFER TO IRRIGATION
PLANS FOR IRRIGATION
INFORMATION.
REFER TO PLANTING PLANS
FOR QUANTITY AND SIZE
PROTECT TREES DURING
TRANSPORTATION AND
THROUGHOUT
CONSTRUCTION - REMOVE
PROTECTION AFTER TREE HAS
BEEN PLANTED
ROOT BALL. REMOVE ALL
WIRE. SCORE ROOT BALL AND
PULL BACK TOP 1
3 OF BURLAP
AND TWINE
4" TOPSOIL MIN, FINE
GRADE AND SOD
PREPARED OR
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE
SUBGRADE -
SCARIFY WALLS
OF TREE PIT TO
ENSURE GOOD
WATERING
PERCOLATION
REFER TO IRRIGATION
PLANS FOR IRRIGATION
INFORMATION.
3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD
MULCH COVER, PLANTING,
TURF OR APPROVED EQUAL.
VERIFY W/ LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT FINAL MULCHING
REQUIREMENTS
4" HIGH WATERING RING,
DIAMETER TO MATCH
ROOT BALL AREA - FOR
CONSTR. PHASE ONLY,
REMOVE MULCH RINGS
PRIOR TO FINAL WALK
THRU
REFER TO PLANTING PLANS
FOR QUANTITY AND SIZE
PROTECT TREES DURING
TRANSPORTATION AND
THROUGHOUT
CONSTRUCTION - REMOVE
PROTECTION AFTER TREE HAS
BEEN PLANTED
REFER TO PLANTING PLANS
FOR ADDITIONAL TREE
INFORMATION
WRAP AND PROTECT TREES
THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION,
REMOVE TREE WRAPPING AFTER
1-YEAR WARRANTY WALK
THROUGH
4" TOPSOIL MIN, FINE
GRADE AND SOD
PREPARED OR
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE
3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD
MULCH COVER, PLANTING, TURF
OR APPROVED EQUAL. VERIFY
W/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FINAL
MULCHING REQUIREMENTS
4" HIGH WATERING RING.
DIAMETER TO MATCH ROOT
BALL AREA - FOR CONSTR.
PHASE ONLY, REMOVE
MULCH RINGS PRIOR TO
FINAL WALK THRU
SUBGRADE -
SCARIFY WALLS
OF TREE PIT TO
ENSURE GOOD
WATERING
PERCOLATION
REFER TO IRRIGATION
PLANS FOR IRRIGATION
INFORMATION.
2 [ DIA. OF BALL MIN.
REFER TO IRRIGATION
PLANS FOR IRRIGATION
INFORMATION.
REFER TO PLANTING
PLANS FOR QUANTITY
AND SIZE
WRAP AND PROTECT TREES
THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION,
REMOVE TREE WRAPPING
AFTER 1-YEAR WARRANTY
WALK THROUGH
ROOT BALL. REMOVE ALL
WIRE. SCORE ROOT BALL
AND PULL BACK TOP 1
3 OF
BURLAP AND TWINE
SHREDDED HARDWOOD
MULCH. @ 3" DEPTH.
APPROVED
PLANTING SOIL
MIX AS SPECIFIED
4" TOPSOIL MIN,
FINE GRADE AND
SOD
PREPARED OR
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE
VARIES
REFER TO IRRIGATION PLANS
FOR IRRIGATION
INFORMATION.
UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE
PLANTING SOIL MIX
PROPOSED PLANTING BED,
REFER TO PLANTING AREAS.
DRESS BED WITH 3" OF FINELY
SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH
12" MIN.AS SHOWN, SEE L401SECONDARY EDGE OFPLANTING BEDDD D
NOTES:
1.D = TYPICAL ON CENTER (O.C.)
SPACING AS INDICATED IN THE
PLANTING SCHEDULE
2.REFER TO IRRIGATION PLANS FOR
IRRIGATION INFORMATION.
PLANT
CENTER,
TYP.
PLANT MATERIAL, SEE SHEET L401
MULCH, AS SPECIFIED
PREPARED OR UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE
PLANTING SOIL MIX
1/2 D 1/2 D
PRIMARY EDGE OF PLANTING BEDD
Xref /Users/GanieOOeMXricKNo/DropEo[ (TVLS)/AUTOCAD/DETAILS/PLANTING/PLANTINGS ON SLOPE.GZJ
2 X DIAMETER
OF ROOT BALL
6"
MIN.REFER TO IRRIGATION
PLANS FOR IRRIGATION
INFORMATION.
UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE
PREPARED PLANTING
SOIL, AS SPECIFIED
SHREDDED HARDWOOD
MULCH, 3" DEPTH
ROOT BALL. REMOVE ALL
WIRE, SCORE, AND PULL
BACK TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP
AND TWINE
SCALE:1" = 1'-0"
DECIDUOUS BALL AND BURLAP TREE PLANTING, TYPICAL1 SCALE:1" = 1'-0"
CONIFEROUS BALL AND BURLAP TREE PLANTING, TYPICAL2 SCALE:1" = 1'-0"
DECIDUOUS SPAYED TREE PLANTING, TYPICAL3 SCALE:1" = 1'-0"
CONIFEROUS SPAYED TREE PLANTING, TYPICAL4
SCALE:1" = 1'-0"
SHRUB PLANTING, TYPICAL6 SCALE:1" = 1'-0"
GARDEN PLANTINGS, TYPICAL7 SCALE:1" = 1'-0"
GROUNDCOVER PLANTINGS, TYPICAL8
SCALE:1" = 1'-0"
DECIDUOUS BARE-ROOT PLANTING, TYPICAL5 SCALE:1" = 1'-0"
PLANTINGS ON SLOPE9
creation Gate:11/17/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L607.GZJOast saveG:GanieOOeMXricKNo NovePEer 17, 2020 5:05 PMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
ROOT ZONE
ROOT PRUNING
LIMITS
PRUNING CUT, TYP.,
PER ARBORIST
RECOMMENDATIONS
BASE OF TREE
GROUND PLANE
PLAN VIEW
MAXIMUM 25" ON ONE SIDE OR 33 OF
TOTAL ROOT SYSTEM
NO MORE THAN HALF
THE CROWN OF THE TREE
AT END OF SLOPE SECURE BLANKET
MATERIAL BY INSERTINGSTAPLES ABOUT
20" APART THROUGH THE FABRIC
EXTEND MATERIAL ABOUT
40" ON TOP OF THE
GROUND AND RANDOMLY
INSERT STAPLES
THROUGH THE MATERIAL
ABOUT 20" APART
NOTES:
1.EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TO BE CATEGORY 4-COCONUT 2S FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1 AND SIDES AND
BOTTOM OF ALL DRAINAGE SWALES AND PONDING AREAS AND CATEGORY 2-STRAW 2S FOR ALL SLOPES LESS
THAN 5:1 PER MNDOT SPEC. SECTION 3885.
2.INSTALL PER MNDOT SPEC. SECTION 2575
LONGITUDINAL SEAMS:
BLANKET MATERIAL MUST OVERLAP
AT LEAST 6" AND STAPLES INSERTED
THROUGH BOTH FABRICS AT A
MAXIMUM SPACING OF 40" APART
TRANSVERSE SEAMS:
BLANKET MATERIAL MUST
OVERLAP AT LEAST 6" AND
STAPLES INSERTED THROUGH
BOTH FABRICS AT A MAXIMUM
SPACING OF 20" APART
STAPLES AT 3' O.C.
STAPLES MUST BE
INSERTED THROUGH
OVERLAP MATERIAL SLOPE LENGTH
LESS
THAN
50
'
1.BEFORE INSTALLATION APPLY TOPSOIL, FERTILIZER AND SEED TO SURFACE.
2.BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL, INSTALL MATS BY ANCHORING IN A 6" DEEP BY 6" WIDE TRENCH WITH
APPROXIMATELY 12" OF MAT EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR WITH A
ROW OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE
TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" PORTION OF MAT BACK
OVER SEED AND SOIL. SECURE MATS WITH A WITH A ROW OF STAPLES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" APART
ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE MATS.
3.ROLL CENTER MATS IN DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW IN BOTTOM OF CHANNEL.
4.PLACE CONSECUTIVE AND ADJACENT MATS END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH A MINIMUM 6" OVERLAP. USE
A DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES STAGGERED 4" APART AND 4" ON CENTER TO SECURE OVERLAPPED MATS.
5.FULL LENGTH EDGE OF MATS AT TOP OF SIDE SLOPES MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES
APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN A 6" DEEP BY 6" WIDE TRENCH.
6.THE TERMINAL END OF MATS MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN A 6"
DEEP BY 6" WIDE TRENCH.
7.BACKFILL AND SEED AFTER STAPLING.
8.FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROPER INSTALLATION.
FABRIC ANCHORAGE
TRENCH BACKFILL
WITH TAMPED
NATURAL SOIL
WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT,
ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH
WITH HOG RINGS, PER MNDOT SPEC.
SECTION 3886 B1.
SILT FENCE
FABRIC
DIRECTION OF
RUNOFF FLOW
METAL (OR WOOD)
POST OR STAKE
NATURAL SOIL
1.SILT FENCES SHOULD
BE INSTALLED ON THE
CONTOUR (AS OPPOSED
TO UP AND DOWN A
HILL) AND
CONSTRUCTED SO THAT
FLOW CANNOT BYPASS
THE ENDS.
2.ENSURE THAT THE
DRAINAGE AREA IS NO
GREATER THAN 1/4
ACRE PER 100 FT OF
FENCE.
3.MAKE THE FENCE
STABLE FOR THE
10-YEAR PEAK STORM
RUNOFF.
4.WHERE ALL RUNOFF IS
TO BE STORED BEHIND
THE SILT FENCE,
ENSURE THAT THE
MAXIMUM SLOPE
LENGTH BEHIND THE
FENCE DOES NOT
EXCEED THE
SPECIFICATIONS
SHOWN IN TABLENOTE: SILT FENCE SHALL FOLLOW
MNDOT SPEC. SECTION 3886.
DESIGN
RECOMMENDATIONS
FIGURE 1: TYPICAL INSTALLATION FOR SILT FENCE
6"
MIN 6"MINPLAN VIEW
NOTES:
1.ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION. AFTER
DEMOLITION OR AS NECESSARY, TREE PROTECTION FENCING MAY BE RELOCATED WITH APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL TREE
PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
2.TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL CONSIST OF TEMPORARY METAL WIRE CHAIN LINK MESH FENCING OR APPROVED EQUAL.
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STORE ANY MATERIALS OR PARK ANY VEHICLES IN TREE PROTECTION ZONES. THE FENCE SHALL PREVENT TRAFFIC
MOVEMENT AND THE PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, STOCKPILES AND SUPPLIES FROM HARMING VEGETATION WITHIN THE
LIMITS OF PROTECTION.
4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEANLY CUT ALL ROOTS EXPOSED BY GRADING AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND STAGING AREAS.
6' MAX
6' MAX.
POST SPACING 3' MINIMUM 6' IDEAL
FROM DRIPLINE
DRIPLINE
2/3 OFLOGDRIPLINE
INSTALL SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH
(MNDOT TYPE 6). EQUIVALENT MATERIAL
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT THE DISCRETION
OF THE ENGINEER.
STAKE DRIVEN THROUGH LOG MESH
COIR LOG 6"-7" MINIMUM DIAMETER
SOIL
WEDGE OR 2"X2" STAKE
PRE-DRILLED HOLES
0.5"X0.5" OPENING IN NET
1/3 OFLOG10' MIN LENGTH
2" WASHED COURSE AGGREGATE,
12" THICK, OVER GEOFABRIC
50'
M
I
N
20' MI
N
EDG
E
O
F
P
U
B
LI
C
R
O
A
D
O
R
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
TABLE 1: MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH AND SLOPE FOR WHICH SILT FENCE IS APPLICABLE
BY CALCULATION BY CALCULATION BY ACCEPTED DESIGN
PRACTICES
SLOPE (H:V)SILT FENCE STORAGE EQUALS
2 FT FOR A 100-YEAR EVENT
SILT FENCE STORAGE EQUALS 2 FT
FOR A 2-YEAR EVENT OR 3 FT FOR A
100-YEAR EVENT
MAXIMUM SLOPE
LENGTH
100:1 1400 FT 900 FT 100 FT
50:1 2200 FT 450 FT 75 FT
25:1 4100 FT 225 FT 75 FT
20:1 580 FT 180 FT 75-50
17:1 667 FT 150 FT 50 FT
12.5:1 850 FT 112 FT 50 FT
10:1 1040 FT 90 FT 50-25 FT
5:1 2020 FT 45 FT 25-15 FT
4:1 2516 FT 36 FT 15 FT
3:1 3312 FT 27 FT 15 FT
2:1 508 FT 18 FT 15 FT
L609
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
1" = 16'creation Gate:11/19/2020fiOepatK:/Users/EretZieseOer/DropEo[ (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BRUNER RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/5. VARIANCE/L609.GZJOast saveG:GanieOOeMXricKNo NovePEer 19, 2020 8:10 PMTKe GesiJns sKoZn anG GescriEeG Kerein incOXGinJ aOO tecKnicaO GraZinJs,
JrapKics anG specifications tKereof, are proprietar\ anG cannot Ee copieG,
GXpOicateG or coPPerciaOO\ e[pOoiteG, in ZKoOe or in part, ZitKoXt tKe e[press
Zritten perPission of Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. TKese are avaiOaEOe for
OiPiteG revieZ anG evaOXation E\ cOients, consXOtants, contractors,
JovernePent aJencies, anG venGors onO\ in accorGance ZitK tKis notice.
Cop\riJKt 2020Travis Van Liere StXGio, LLC. AOO riJKts reserveG.
Oicense no:
I KereE\ certif\ tKat tKis pOan, specification, or report Zas prepareG E\ Pe or
XnGer P\ Girect sXpervision anG tKat I aP a GXO\ LicenseG LanGscape
ArcKitect XnGer tKe OaZs of tKe State of Minnesota.
43728
T R A V I S V A N L I E R E
Gate:1/23/2018
6 6 0 9 H O R S E S H O E C U R V E
C H A N H A S S E N , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 1 7
B R U N E R R E S I D E N C E
DraZn B\:
Date:
ScaOe:
DraZinJ:
SKeet:
12/18/2020
DJ
Rev #Description Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION 12/18/2020
N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N
211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
t 612 345 4275
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
VARIANCE DOCUMENTS
DECEMBER 18, 2020
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SURROUNDING CONTEXT
1” = 200’
LOTUS LAKE
6609 HORSESHOE CURVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
N
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 2016 - PRE-REMODEL
1” = 40’
LOTUS LAKE
N
Bruner Residence - chanhassen, minnesota
PREVIOUS EXISTING SITE PLAN + NOTES PRE-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS PRE-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - chanhassen, minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS PRE-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS PRE-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS POST-CHRISTIAN DEAN ARCHITECTURE
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
3D MODEL RENDERINGS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE DESIGN (TVLS)
WALK-OUT TERRACE
2
1
3
5
6
4
PROPOSED GATHERING SPACE: Creates habitable + enjoyable family gathering space
BLUFF SETBACK AREA ENCROACHMENT VARIANCE
REPLACE / RECONFIGURE EXISTING BOULDER RETAINING WALL VARIANCE
REPLACE / RECONFIGURE EXISTING BOULDER RETAINING WALL VARIANCE
PROPOSED SLOPETAME 3
EROSION CONTROL
SYSTEM: Controls slope and
adds natural + sustainable
character
PROPOSED LAKESIDE STAIRCASE: Creates safe + easy access down to lakeshore with slope mitigation
PROPOSED LAKESIDE DECK: Fits within the footprint of existing concrete patio + maintains alignment with plan layout
PROPOSED NEW DRIVEWAY: Facilitates access to property + maintains alignment with plan layout
PROPOSED LOW MAINTENANCE GRASS: Naturalizes and covers full property ground cover
EROSION CONTROL
LAKESIDE STAIRCASE
LAKESIDE DECK
DRIVEWAY
GROUNDCOVER
1
2
3
5
6
4
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
3D MODEL RENDERINGS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE DESIGN (TVLS)
WALK-OUT TERRACE
PROPOSED GATHERING SPACE: Creates habitable + enjoyable family gathering space
BLUFF SETBACK AREA ENCROACHMENT VARIANCE
REPLACE / RECONFIGURE EXISTING BOULDER RETAINING WALL VARIANCE
PROPOSED SLOPETAME 3 EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Controls slope and adds natural + sustainable character
EROSION CONTROL
REPLACE / RECONFIGURE EXISTING BOULDER RETAINING WALL VARIANCE
PROPOSED LAKESIDE STAIRCASE: Creates safe + easy access down to lakeshore with slope mitigation
LAKESIDE STAIRCASE
PROPOSED LAKESIDE DECK: Fits within the footprint of existing concrete patio + maintains alignment with plan layout
PROPOSED LOW MAINTENANCE GRASS: Naturalizes and covers full property ground cover
LAKESIDE DECK
GROUNDCOVER
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
3D MODEL RENDERINGS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE DESIGN (TVLS)
WALK-OUT TERRACE
PROPOSED GATHERING SPACE: Creates habitable + enjoyable family gathering space
BLUFF SETBACK AREA ENCROACHMENT VARIANCE
REPLACE / RECONFIGURE EXISTING BOULDER RETAINING WALL VARIANCE
PROPOSED SLOPETAME 3 EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Controls slope and adds natural + sustainable character
EROSION CONTROL
REPLACE / RECONFIGURE EXISTING BOULDER RETAINING WALL VARIANCE
PROPOSED LAKESIDE STAIRCASE: Creates safe + easy access down to lakeshore with slope mitigation
LAKESIDE STAIRCASE
PROPOSED LAKESIDE DECK: Fits within the footprint of existing concrete patio + maintains alignment with plan layout
LAKESIDE DECK
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
3D MODEL RENDERINGS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE DESIGN (TVLS)
PROPOSED NEW DRIVEWAY: Facilitates access to property + maintains alignment with plan layout
DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED LOW MAINTENANCE GRASS: Naturalizes and covers full property ground cover
GROUNDCOVER
Bruner Residence - Chanhassen, Minnesota
December 17, 2020
3D MODEL RENDERINGS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE DESIGN (TVLS)
PROPOSED NEW DRIVEWAY: Facilitates access to property + maintains alignment with plan layout
DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED LOW MAINTENANCE GRASS: Naturalizes and covers full property ground cover
GROUNDCOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO: MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner, AICP
FROM: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist
DATE: January 19, 2021
SUBJ: 6609 Horseshoe Curve, Variances from Bluff Setback
The property is a fully wooded site of mainly native deciduous trees. The proposed landscaping
changes will require the removal of 7 trees on the site. No replanting has been proposed. A
fescue mix will be seeded over the disturbed areas and is appropriate for the conditions. The
plans show perimeter erosion control fencing which will protect most trees on the property, but
there are a number shown for preservation that will be inside of the grading limits. The native
trees on site, maples, lindens, oaks, and such, are sensitive to root compaction and root
severance. More so for the older trees that may have less ability to recover from root damage.
Grade changes, whether adding soil or removing it, can damage important feeder roots causing
the death of a portion of the root system. Given enough damage, the trees will die. Staff
recommends that the applicant add tree protection for all preserved trees located within the
grading limits.
Recommendation:
1. The applicant shall install tree protection fencing at the furthest point from the trunk as possible
around all trees within the grading limits.
Memorandum
To: MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner
From: Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Coordinator
CC: Charles Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Ryan Pinkalla, Water Resources Technician
Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer
Date: January 6, 2021
Re: 6609 Horseshoe Curve Variance - City Planning Case No. 2021-07
The Water Resources Department has reviewed variance request located at 6609 Horseshoe
Curve. These comments are divided into two categories: general comments and propo sed
conditions. General comments are informational points to guide the applicant in the proper
planning of any water resources issues or stormwater infrastructure fo r this project, to inform
the applicant of possible extraordinary issues and/or to provide the basis for findings.
Proposed conditions are requirements that Water Resources recommends be formally imposed
on the applicant in the final order.
General Comments/Findings
1. The applicant is requesting two variances. One bluff setback variance and one variance
to replace and reconfigure the existing boulder retaining wall. The applicant went
through multiple rounds of submittals and revisions with City staff in order to better
accommodate City ordinances and staff recommendations.
2. The property is located on Lotus Lake. According to the Riley-Purgatory Bluff Creek
Watershed District, water quality on Lotus Lake has improved in some parameters, such
as water clarity and phosphorus, but degraded in others, such as chlorophyll-a, in recent
years. The project is proposing construction very close to the lake and on the steep
slopes on the project.
3. The applicant has one existing Water Oriented Accessory Structure (WOAS) on the
property, which consists of pavers and a deck. This WOAS is considered non-conforming
because it encroaches beyond the 10-foot Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) setback
and is over the allowable 250 square feet. The applicant is proposing to remove and
replace this existing WOAS with one that is 220 square feet of deck patio. This means
that the existing WOAS, which is considered impervious surface, would be replaced with
non-impervious surface. The proposed WOAS would still encroach beyond the 10-foot
OHWL setback, however there is no way for the applicant to orient this structure
without encroaching into other setbacks such as side yard and bluff setbacks. Overall,
the applicant is proposing to reduce the intensity of the existing non-conformity.
Additionally, hardcover on the entire property (due, in part, to the removal of the
existing WOAS) would be decreasing from 23% to 21%.
4. The existing property currently has no easy access down to the lake. The applicant is
proposing to construct a staircase from the lower-level deck patio to the lakeshore. This
proposed staircase meets the standard set forth in Sec. 20-481(e)(3) Stairway, lifts, and
landings.
5. The applicant proposing the installation of a “Living Wall” and fescue that is called “Low
Grow No Mow.” This is intended to reduce erosion potential on the retaining wall area
and on steep slopes on the property. The City feels this approach can be effective.
6. As for other water resources issues: outside of Lotus Lake, there are no wetlands on this
property. In addition, this project does not involves any City owned stormwater
infrastructure. As such, there are no concerns or conditions to place on the project
based on these conditions.
7. It is the opinion of the Water Resources Department that this variance request can be
granted in accordance with the requirements of the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances (as
it pertains to Water Resources requirements) and City Standards, provided it fully
addresses the comments and conditions contained herein, if applicable, and can be
approved.
Proposed Conditions
1. There are no proposed conditions associated with a review by the Water Resources
department. Given the sensitive nature of Lotus Lake, the proximity of the proposed
work to the lake, and the steep slopes on site, extra care and review will be undertaken
during the building permit process to ensure that proper erosion and sediment control
measures are undertaken during construction to protect the lake.
Memorandum
To: MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner
From: Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer
CC: Charles Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer
George Bender, Assistant City Engineer
Kevin Crooks, Utility Superintendent
Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Coordinator
Ryan Pinkalla, Water Resources Technician
Steve Lenz, Engineering Technician
Date: January 7, 2021
Re: Setback Variance at 6609 Horseshoe Curve – Planning Case #2021-
07
The Engineering Department has reviewed the Variance submittal for 6609 Horseshoe Curve.
These comments are divided into two categories: general comments and proposed conditions.
General comments are informational points to guide the applicant in the proper planning of
public works infrastructure for this project, to inform the applicant of possible extraordinary
issues and/or to provide the basis for findings. Proposed conditions are requirements that
Engineering recommends be formally imposed on the developer in the final order. Note that
references to the “City Standards” herein refer to the City of Chanhassen Standard
Specifications and Detail Plates.
General Comments/Findings
1. Any and all grading, utility and transportation plans submitted with this application have
been reviewed only for the purpose of determining the feasibility of the plans and
providing utility and transportation facilities for the project in accordance with City
Standards. A recommendation of variance approval does not constitute final approval
of details, including but not limited to alignments, materials and points of access,
connection or discharge, that are depicted or suggested in the application. The
applicant is required to submit detailed construction drawings and/or plat drawings for
the project, as applicable. The City of Chanhassen Engineering and Public Works
Department will review plans, in detail, when they are submitted and approve, reject or
require modifications to the plans or drawings based upon conformance with City
Standards, the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances and the professional engineering
judgment of the City Engineer.
2. It is the opinion of the Engineering Department that the proposed project can be
developed in accordance with the requirements of the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances
(as it pertains to Engineering and Public Works requirements) and City Standards,
provided it fully addresses the comments and conditions contained herein, an d can be
approved.
3. The applicant is proposing the reconfiguration and realignment of an existing driveway
to the property. The provided survey indicates that the proposed driveway will be
constructed with a 19% grade oriented from Horseshoe Curve right-of-way to the
existing home. While city ordinance requires driveways to be constructed with a grade
not to exceed 10%, the subdivision (Alicia Heights) received approved variances allowing
for a maximum of 20% grades on driveways due to the topographic constraints of the
development. As such, the proposed driveway grade can be approved, however the
applicant will be required to file for a Driveway Replacement permit as work will impact
Horseshoe Curve right-of-way.
4. The applicant is proposing the reconfiguration and realignment of an existing Water
Oriented Structure (WOAS). The existing WOAS consists of stone pavers and wood
decking which will be removed and replaced with a modular wood decking WOAS. The
WOAS lies within a public drainage and utility easement (DUE) that was recorded with
the Alicia Heights plat in 1999. Additionally, the city owns and maintains a public
sanitary sewer main constructed in 1975 that is located within the DUE and located
directly under the existing and proposed WOAS. As such, the applicant will be required
to enter into an encroachment agreement for the WOAS, and the WOAS shall be
constructed so that it is removable to allow for access to and for the proper
maintenance of the public sanitary sewer main. See proposed condition 1 and 2.
5. The applicant is proposing the construction of stairs to gain lake access from the
proposed lower level deck patio to the proposed WOAS. While this proposed staircase
meets the standards set forth in Sec. 20 -481(e)(3) and Sec. 20-1402, they will encroach
into a 5’ side yard DUE. See proposed condition 1.
Proposed Conditions
1. The applicant shall file for an encroachment agreement with the city for any
encroachments within public drainage and utility easements.
2. The water oriented structure shall be constructed of modular, removable d ecking for
review and approval by the city prior to issuance of a building permit.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
( ss.
COTJNTY OF CARVER )
I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on
January 7,2021,the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk ofthe City of Chanhassen,
Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy ofthe anached notice ofa Public
Hearing to consider a request for a variance to replace/rebuild retaining walls, add a walk-
out terrace, add a stairway to lake, and reconfigure lakeside deck/patio located at 6609
Horseshoe Curve. Zoned Single-Famity Residential (RSF), Planning Case No. 2021-07 to
the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy ofsaid notice in an envelope
addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the
United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such
owners were those appearing as such by the records ofthe County Treasurer, Cawer County,
Minnesota, and by other appropriate records.
J
Subscribed and
thislt- dav o
Kim T.euwissen, Deputy Cl
(Seal)
JEAil M SiIECKLIIIG
NdryPlnbffinstsry*tE+..btr,l4a
s to before me
<a^^
2021.
Notary Public
Disclaianer
This map is neither a legally Ecorded map nor a survey and i3 not intended to be used
as one. ihis map is a compilalion of records. information and alata located in vadous city.
county. sliate and fede.al offices and other sources regarding the arca shown, and as to
be used br reference pumo6es o.lly. The cny does nol war.ant that the Geog6phic
lnbrmation System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are eror free, and lhe City does
not represeni ulat the Gls Data can te used for navigational trackino or any other
porpose requanng exactng measurement of dEliance or directlon or pleosion in the
deficton of geographic Catures. The precedang disdairier is provided pursuant to
Minnesota Statnes S466.03, Subd. 2l (2000). and the user of trlas map acknowledges
fiat lhe City shall not be liable tor any damages. and expressly waives all daims. and
agrees to d;iend, indemnily, and hold harmless the City fom any ard all claims b(ought
b, user, its employees or agents. or third parties which aise out of the us€/s access or
use of data provrcled
<TAX_NAMET
<TAX_ADD_LI r
rTAX ADD L2r
<Next Record>(TAX-NAMED
<TAX_ADD-Llr
<TAX ADD L2tr
Diaclelmer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a suoey and is not intended to be used
as one This map is a @mpilation of records. information and daia located in vadous city
count, state and lederal off@s and other sources regardang the area shown, and is to
be us€d lor reference purposes only. The Cjty does not war.ant that the Geographic
lnformalion System (GlS) Dala used to prepare this map are eror f.ee, and the City does
not represent that the GIS oata can be used for navigallonal, tracking oa any other
purpose requiring exactjng measuemenl of distrance or dhection or precasaon in the
depiction of geographic ieatures. The prececlang disclaimer is provided puBuant to
Minnesota Statutes 5466.03, Subd 21 (2000), and the user ol this map acknowjedges
that the City shall not be liable fo. any damages, and exPressly waives all claims and
agrees to debnd, indemnat, and hold harmless the Caty from any and all claims brought
by Ljser. ils employees or agents, or third parties wllich adse out ot the use/s access or
use of data provided.
Subject
Parcel
\'\
-il
-/Z\
K
\
.,
-')\
.t#)>2
h-I
I
I
!
n
r
,/
.A ll
2?'.,
)
aI
\
\.\:!
Subiect
Parcel
o:
HH;,.tl,oo:!i ro = ettc (5 c= oesEb:Ifoetrg:i E3 0,
€;iE E
sEE;t
}EeEE
N B=€=
$EE:t
E Efi93-cetri!>i5 Ea6o=!9ob;bFs
fc
Ecq)
o.c,coE
(.)
e
it)
G
B
E
.c)Nc
0)Yoo
=(Jocoo
0)
([
o,
o,
oIt)'6'
o-
.r2
E
fo-oo
o,co
o)
Eo
.,-
.a
o
oo
o-
ciE'-
o)o
E
(,
Eo
dr ii6(uoo)c ct)(o(!ao-cB!i
Ol,o*?EI6';b-Or,
=->
>. q)s<
;
=]
o
o
E
o.,
-o
0)
E
+
C,tc
fo
o
6
E
;ao
=t-o
NoN
o
:
E
oooo
t!E
.:
c
c,o
a
c
.96
.!2
E
Eoo
o
o-
o
o
o
ul
oc
=d)
t
q)
,9
I.IJ
U.l
oca
co
ic
G
c0
d
o
.!2
t
e
.9.
o,
lo
o)oE
o,
-
o
@(o
o
o
-9
Ee3,
=r-o' < c,EDC Y O
-EE "g.' EEet E 3s Eo-- os!F+P6 e:=6
EEE E;T!::op EgEE
: HE gEifi
E== i="EE
Ene Iifig
9cu i'_*Et
EE= EE E=.9E.=60FOO-:i o)o o;in-c 0)(! c(J ir-Naot
=oo
r5
l
E
o
.s
o
.9
o,c
o
o)-c
.9Eao
.aE
o
rl)
oo-
lo-
il)
F
ID.c.
(.)E
=
!
d
,E
:
=
E
..2
F
c
cioo
a-
o
NoN
o,
-r!)co
([o
o.)aF
6
d,
o
=oot-F-
ui
o
-o
E(t,
_co
ocJo()
oI
O
Id,>E)(,c
= Ein2 6o66Pe:s(E'0 ,a-ooEEelI
EEE
EEE(E .r, .,>= o):ste(!E,o)
xi P .sl
qsr 6
HE E
bsEE='c;o)6Er
L!at
.q
c
IDp
ot
E([t!
cq,
o)(5
o)ocv
Eo
Eo,
6E5(,,}l
9-aEa6o.9q
O^c.;t
XE
.dl6a
c)(0ol'6o
b8(l)E,>'8pp6
eEots
JC
C,Eo)L
A6
=xIE
(o
!
E
ai
Ec
o)
(!
-cc(!.cq'6
=
=;
-c
a
o
o.)
E
EEiieii,EigE
EgIBEEgEEiiEE
EEE;EEEiEEEEE
rii?EEBEai;;g
iEiEEEEiEE?ig
gciiiEgEiEEEEi
EiEEiiEE;[fiEE
E
q
E I
E
E-2
E
E
q
E
.9a q
tg
q!63
a
E
!
9 c
5
E
9
E
8
EE
,9 z
e
E
-!!
',q
5
6a ..o9EEoo
o=C'E
=ooo
iiog
'o
tooo
o-
>Etoo'Eo.oeto-J
I ii)o,=
o. :lf=
-Oo.t
=;
o
t!ooJ
:joooILo
A
G(J
CLrL
CDE
oo
=Eoo
.= .a
EEatE-LE.9oEofEDo-E
oE
0,G-9d
OEza
6l!EtrE.co
o
EooE
PEE'6l!ano'=-EaJ=
=o€odp
oc
nE
6126
oo6Eto
o
E
.9
F
E
cioo
t-
o
NoN
ot
(\l
fco
jo!
lt)
=F
5
ci
.E
.:
-q
o
o-o
EoE
(.)cloo
o-
p2dl
o,
o
ooF-t-
9d,>(,,(5C
= Ea
,EE?l,D(|/);:
e:s(!.o,ia o.E
9sr.8
e E*
EEEh= a)'EO!l
9= E
r gt
eoE
EHE,J- -c:i(,o
;gE
EqE
srt
L!
tr
Ec
c)p
C,)t
Eo
LL
dl
ul
ll,)c-
d)
i.
o)
.9tr
o)Cf
dl
F
c
,q
co
ci
ao
.9
o
E
o
eo
d)o
AE(-):
oroOot
oq
i!
or !io;(o-@<
c,
0o.
oE
9-icB
=!a
*-EE Ec ;tEes EreE.! Y ^E o, -c -o F-+ ='o, o- f =
:3EE E *"; E!
Eeqg:=sEE::E-E ggEE
e;=E E=HgfrEgEI HiE;
igEE saE:
tEE-i *HE,EFE d6+.9FOtr(J(,,rN(.)S
Eoo
E
E
.9o
.2
Eo(.)
cl!
o-
(,
o
o
.,)t 9lc
,EI-EEEA
g EI5fsEE
EgigEEE
=;il€g€E€EEEgAS
P=e 8 g*i.
HEgCIEE
o
E
o
E
=o
=tlI
o
a:c
Ei!,ooo3
(!
.Cq'q
;i
3
.9
(,
Gtl,E
c;c
o)q)
E
o).c,
(.,
oEt
al, oE(,o(5aqc€!=O.,
?E
tB-(! {,
=->do>.oe<
o-c
.9
o
otr;!
oc
=C
Eio
o-cc(o
-cI'6
,Ii
o
(,
ai
-oo)
=^a
.5
o-c
I
DIt)!
-9o-a
rl)
(5
oop
co
g
f
,Etr
ut
o)
ooo-
c
.o
oo
Eoa
o)
o
!co
o
E
o)
()
o
o
o
olc.9a
=ulz
(!Dc
o)
o(')c
o)
o)
Ec
o)E!
9
5
3
E
6
g
-q
6
id
.EF
66
o
!!o
o
oIoJ
Eoolto
o-
(l(,
c!
iio
;o
Eolt
e
o-
>Et.9
o.osto-J
e ii,
6! .=
=a,fl=-(,o.c
.d ..o9CEoo
o=OE
=ooo
a;
Ei:
oa
o
t!cl
ct
o oo o oo N o d) O O O OO O O OO O OO OO O OO o oo o O Fr orn rn + 6 (n a N N a\r !i an.n !i 6t (n N F{ t\ c) N N Fr r.{ r\ ro <l rn f\r (n F{ o Fr or..r o .n F o o o O O O O O O O ln o .Yt (n .n o o o O () .! .\l .! N O .\ N N .'{o 6o...r 6 o o o o oo o oo o o OO O OO O O O OOO OO O O OO6 0 6 E{ (o \o (') Fr ot .r H (tt rrt L,] 0 (n o o o N o o N or o o o o rn o o o oli 6 m o G) (o o coo co@ c) !/) La (n cr an (o aYt La <t <l L/1 l,r'1 rn .Yr .n (n o (n (n.n(n
-(o<'\OOF.F(nrnand)(n(oOO(o@(o(o(oF.(o(oF. l- (o \O(o (o @ (o (o (o (o1 v\ tn v\ ur u) rn lrl L/) Lr') rn ln u1 L/l Lrt r/) r, r.l) Ln r, ra L^ l/l ln L^ Ln la La !n Ln rn ln ul rn
E (.{ N a{ a! a\l l\ N N N a.,J a.,l N N a\r (\ a\ N 61 6lNN(\tNNNN..,lN..,lNNN.\l
4-- C c. n c.4 d. GGG.d.&.6.4,6. e. G. g. G. G, e. E e, E e G d, A,el<raa-.l f f l:)llf llf f lf lllf f >:)llfg-uJoSrSQ U U U (J U (J (J U (J (J U (J U U I U (J U U (J (J U (J
sJ S uJ !! M trr uJ uJ Er u t! uJ t! !J uJ uJ t! uJ uJ uJ uJ u, u,r r.!,r uJ uJ r.!,r sJ ir,ro ; o > ) ) o --.r o J J o o o oo o oo o oo o oo o oo o oo o o
-, - r-, t - G.- e, d. -- - - - I I - - - - - - ! - - E - - t - -th = tt z 2 2 ta F th ts F tt tt tl\ v) tt vt v) ta tt ta ur a t^ u1 th tt1 v, t^ tl\ th th th
r,.r(46aa3(,-6!illl 6 v,t1 th t^ t1 t^ t^ ta t^ ta t^ t^ t^ ta th th vt qt rh \h thd < i v) v) q E ry ts ry lJ E G. e. e, e, G, e, e, g, e e G e, 4 t E E G. G. G. G. G.o o'J.i o s * 10 a o f I oo o ooo oo o oo o oo o ooo ooo o6- -r= ==-o- o.o---- - --- -- --------- --r{ r-.ns 4 a! 4 rn !-.{ t-.1 (! ri) lrl gl !i rn st s1 o uro.ro ct ot Lrt F r-r !r.t (o !-.r !/1 (oNP ib r\ o r,r ut u) o o o o o o o Fr rr ?.r ?.r N a! (ft ri <l (o (o t- F- @ a Fr ot qr qt orI 16 ur G, (n (o alt (o (o ro ro (o (o (o (o (o (0 (o (o @ (o (o (o ro ro \o (o (o ro {o ro to @ roo (o (o (o .n (r) an (o ro (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o o \o to'o ro to (o (o ro lo (o (o (o
(o9an r+ sr @.o@@ ro .t, (o.c,(o(o.o .o,o\o (o (o r-{ r.cr (o (o
=1,l NN Ol!OO NN r.,l a\l N l\r N a! 1\l N NNON a.,l N'i .\J lJ.l t ul r/) v1 la rrt la !n rJ1 r, Lrt rn u1 tn Ln Lo u) tjl tl) rn ulcO a- q! qr Ot Cti Or Or O| Ol q! Ol Ol Ol Ot 01 O1 Cn (,1 Ol Or Ctl Or (Ir
I + r.. x * * r\ ri A A r.. r.. r.. n * * * * .\ r.. n r.. F\ r- |.- r- F. r,. F. F. * F-
.: <r !-.a -{ -r: F{ !-.1 r-{ t-l r..l r-{ F{ Fl F{ Fl Fl .'l .'{ .'{ r'{ ?'{ !"{ r'{ F{ t"l !"4 Fl fl !"{ r'{ Fl
:',.1 .d trt.n r?) i.i (n rn r, ln (n an (n.n.n m ('t .n rn.y, rn m ln rn lr1 rn m ln ln an an an-'tlN r/)tnt ; Ln !n rn ra u) rn l,) 6 !n u1 !n u.,l l^ !n !n Ln u't Ln ra u) r,) rr1 v1 ra rrl Laz ur@ tn 6 l, 6ai ur Ln t,1 lJ1 u) lrt r/l tJ) ln tJ1 Ln t,t La u) L,) rr1 tn L,) rrl La ralJl l./) l/' ur Ln2 z*z z z N z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
^, p yg E i i ;i' i i i i 2 i 2 2 i i i i i ; ; ; i ; 2 i i i i i 2 i'i r- e a r! t! UJ --l UJ r! UJ UJ tlJ El lJ.l UJ UJ UJ lrJ UJ t! U, UJ lr,l UJ UJ LU lrJ lr, L! UJ lrl UJ !U..-r (9 = - a vl vt -4 tlt ttl tt tn vl v\ vl ta ta t^ tal ta ta tn ta ta tn t^ t^ ttt th ra vl ta t\ th
^'- < <l tt ttt ttt <L v) a v) vt th th ti t^ v\ tl\ v\ vt t\ t/\ tll tl\ t\ ttl tt\ ul ttl tt t\ tll t\ tll
2>d- r.--- >- r---r---- --- -- - -- ---- E----,.r 7 H Z Z Z i Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
aio=t--E----I---------------r-----F: .O IIJ 5 U (J U (, U (J U (J 9 (J (J U U (J U U (J (J U (J U (J (J U (J U U (J U U
o
dAA9 6. g. e. 6. g. E E g, G, e, g, G E 6, G, e, G t EEeta\u f f lf lllllllllf lf f f za))=
=!-:-595x O O O o u o o u u u u u u u u u u u = u u u ui ll I t L!4 I 4 Z r! !! uJ uJ rlJ uJ !! LlJ uJ rrJ uJ u, uJ r.!J ur ul ur tr.r r.J gJ ur ur ur:X;>>>1...,O...., O O o o o o o o o o o o O o o O O O O O o o1- e;F F=E rcEG rr---- :E-- --- -:E- I-- E---r 9 (9 = r r i Z F (a F F Vl V't ta ut t^ ta tA th th tt th t/\ Vt Vt Lt\ V\ tlt t\ t\ ttt V, tt'i (al ? !- -- -- = E) : (,lJ !r,l UJ t! trJ lrJ UJ gJ UJ !! UJ lll UJ UJ lr, !r, uJ uJ Lll (rl lrJ UJ uJIrE 3 B A 6 A I E p E E PPPzzzzPPPB?28?zBPPPPPx6=?*ssolof f oooooooooooooooooooooo<;;O===(9.o :E.o.o------ -r- -- - -rr r-- rrrr
lf.r t (o s E B tn ri Fr a{ rYt rJl or F{ (rt <l |n o rJt o.{ o o cD r,) F- r-{ r/) o r-r ra (o Nx o st (o ta rrt rn .! o o o o o o ..{ Fr r-.r i-{ N N (n (r,t sl @ (o F. F o @ cn ol or or (n< F{ Fl (r! rn (o Or O \o @ (O rO (o (o (o rO rO (o 10 rD (o (D (o (o (o tO (O (o (o (o (o (o (o (ots Fr .-r ?.{ (?t d) .n st \o ro ro @ ro ro (o (o (o (o (D (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o
tl\F
?Ba',- .E_5E f E - s 9. --E = -3 Egt* ilEEE! ,,= Es: 6t,Hin -_ efrt?'J
=iEE$iEEIEEiEgEEEE=EE=EiIgIfrEEEEHE