Letter to DNR • •
N H A S CITY OF ClIANIIASSEN
5 Chanhassen is a Community for Life-Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow
July 15, 2021
Jami Markle
Regional Wildlife Manager
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, MN 55106
Dear Jami Markle:
Recently,the City of Chanhassen requested input and collaboration from the MN Department of
Natural Resources (DNR) on a regulatory issue concerning an area of mutual interest. As an
important partner, I want to share feedback regarding the process in hopes that we can work
together to improve for the future.
The specific issue is Planning Case 2021-02, a request to reinstate and subsequently amend the
issued Interim Use Permit(IUP) for a golf driving range located at 825 Flying Cloud Drive. Over
a period of more than six months, City staff reached out to multiple members of your
organization requesting that the DNR comment on the case in general and the condition requiring
the installation of nets in particular. Staff was repeatedly informed that our requests had been
received and that there were no comments; however, during the July 12, 2021 City Council
meeting, Area Wildlife Supervisor, Robert Fashingbauer, who City staff had previously been
informed had no comments on the proposed IUP or its conditions,testified that the DNR
believed the condition to be undesirable/unnecessary and that the DNR had no concerns about
the business's potential impacts on the adjacent wetlands. No effort was made prior to his
appearance to contact City staff and inform us that the DNR had decided to take a position on
this issue.
The City understands that as new information becomes available,your staff may reevaluate their
initial comments and recommendations, or lack thereof; however, it is extremely unprofessional
and discourteous not to provide your local government partners advanced notice of what these
comments and recommendations will be. Had staff been informed by Mr. Fashingbauer of the
DNR's position on the issue, both our report and recommendation would have been altered to
reflect the DNR's comments. Advanced notice would also have provided us with an opportunity
to reach out to other impacted agencies, such as the local watershed district,to verify that they
also shared the DNR's position and were not relying on the City's recommendation to ensure
adequate environmental protections were in place. By providing the DNR's comments in the
manner he did, Mr. Fashingbauer undermined a major purpose of the City submitting Agency
Review Requests to the DNR.
In this case, Mr. Fashingbauer's failure to reach out to City staff is especially inexplicable
because he was forwarded a request for comment by the Area Hydrologist on May 25, 2021 and
PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110
7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 •CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317
Jami Markle, Regional Wildlife Manager
July 15, 2021
Page 2
he subsequently informed her that he had no comments, a position that was relayed to City staff
on June 4, 2021. As he was previously made aware of this case and that the City desired the
DNR's input, it is difficult for us to understand why he did not feel it appropriate to contact City
staff with his revised assessment. I am sure you can appreciate how awkward it is to have the
staff of another agency unexpectedly appear at a public meeting and make comments that
directly contradict a staff recommendation, especially after having been explicitly informed that
this agency and staff member had no comments. I will note that Mr. Fashingbauer was respectful
and apologetic for the lack of notice while speaking at the meeting,which further encourages me
that we all want to work well together and we just need to be more aware of our processes and
impact.
Staff has enclosed a brief timeline of the case in question, our requests for DNR comment, and
the responses we received. It is our belief that the enclosed timeline demonstrates that we went
well beyond the minimum requirements to reach out to your organization for comment and that
your staff members were provided numerous opportunities to comment on the case in advance of
the City Council meeting. It is our hope that in the future your staff will demonstrate their
commitment to our partnership and shared interests by providing comments through the frame
work of the Agency Review Request process,and that, in cases where they revise their initial
assessments,they will reach out to their counterparts here at the City to relay those comments in
advance of providing those comments at public meetings.
Sincerely,
r
edid
Kate Aanenson, AICP
Community Development Director
Attachment
g:lplan12021 planning cases121-02 825 flying cloud dr-golf zonelconfidential\etter to dnr golf zone.docx
Jami Markle, Regional Wildlife Manager
July 15, 2021
Page 3
Timeline:
City staff first submitted an Agency Review Request for this case to the Area Hydrologist,
Taylor Huinker,on December 7, 2020 with a request that comments be provided by
December 21, 2020. Staff received no response.
Prior to the January 25, 2021 City Council meeting, additional questions were posed by the
applicant regarding the IUP's condition requiring the installation of nets. On January 13, staff
emailed and left a voicemail for Taylor Huinker requesting that the DNR weigh in on if they
would still like to require the netting. Staff requested that this question be forwarded to the Non-
game Wildlife Manager or other appropriate staff members, as we recognized that it may not fall
under the Area Hydrologist's preview. On January 14, Taylor Huinker forwarded staffs question
to Non-game Specialist,Neil Slifka, and Area Wildlife Supervisor, Diana Regenscheild. Staff
received no response.
In response to the owner's request that the condition requiring netting be removed,the City
submitted an Agency Review Request to the Area Hydrologist on May 24, 2021 with a request
that comments be provided by June 3, 2021. On May 24, 2021, staff emailed Taylor Huniker and
again requested that the information and request for comment be forwarded to Neil Slifka and
Diana Regenscheid. On May 25, staff received an email from Taylor stating that she would
forward the request to Neil Slifka and Robert Fashingbauer, who had replaced Diana
Regenscheild. On June 2, 2021, staff again reached out to Taylor Huniker noting that we had not
received any comments and asking if either Neil Slifka or Robert Fashingbauer would like to
comment. On June 4, 2021, Tylor Huniker sent staff an email stating that she had not heard back
from Neilf Slifka, but that Robert Fashingbauer had no comments.
During the July 12, 2021 City Council meeting, Robert Fashingbauer attended and informed the
City Council that he had visited the site on July 9,2021 and that the DNR did not believe the nets
should be installed and had no concerns with operation of a golf driving range and associated
equipment adjacent to and potentially within a wetland. Prior to this, no effort was made by Mr.
Fashingbauer to reach out to City staff to discuss the condition or to advise us that his position on
the case had changed.