Loading...
09-07-21 Agenda and PacketAGENDA  CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2021, 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.CALL TO ORDER B.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.Consider a Request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Drive­Thru Pick­Up Window at 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 (Crisp and Green) 2.Consider a Request for Subdivision of Two Parcels into Three Lots and One Outlot and Site Plan Review for Development of an Approximately 82,000­Square Foot, One­Story Office­Warehouse Building at 2100 Stoughton Avenue (River Valley Industrial Center) C.APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.Approve Planning Commission Minutes dated August 17, 2021 D.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1.City Council Action Update E.ADJOURNMENT NOTE: Planning Commission meetings are scheduled to end by 10:30 p.m. as outlined in the official by­laws.  We will make every attempt to complete the hearing for each item on the agenda.  If, however, this does not appear to be possible, the Chairperson will notify those present and offer rescheduling options.  Items thus pulled from consideration will be listed first on the agenda at the next Commission meeting. If a constituent or resident sends an email to staff or the Planning Commission, it must be made part of the public record based on State Statute. If a constituent or resident sends an email to the Mayor and City Council, it is up to each individual City Council member and Mayor if they want it to be made part of the public record or not. There is no State Statute that forces the Mayor or City Council to share that information with the public or be made part of the public record. Under State Statute, staff cannot remove comments or letters provided as part of the public input process. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, September 7, 2021 Subject Consider a Request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Drive­Thru Pick­Up Window at 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 (Crisp and Green) Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.1. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2021­18 PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a drive­thru facility for a pick­up window subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; and Adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow a drive­thru pick­up window as part of their restaurant operation. APPLICANT Applicant: Jason Pinski, Shingobee, 669 N. Medina Street, Loretto, MN 55357 / Owner: Brian Burdick, 530 W. 79th Street, Chanhassen, MN 55317 SITE INFORMATION PRESENT ZONING:  Business and Highway Services District, BH LAND USE:Commercial ACREAGE:  0.91 acres  APPLICATION REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article IV, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article XVII. Business and Highway Services District BACKGROUND Frontier Development Park was approved by the Chanhassen Village Council on March 2, 1970.  A one­story, office­ retail building was constructed on the site in 1982­1983. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, September 7, 2021SubjectConsider a Request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Drive­Thru Pick­Up Window at530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 (Crisp and Green)Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.1.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2021­18PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) toallow a drive­thru facility for a pick­up window subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; andAdopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThe applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow a drive­thru pick­up window as part of their restaurantoperation.APPLICANTApplicant: Jason Pinski, Shingobee, 669 N. Medina Street, Loretto, MN 55357 / Owner: Brian Burdick, 530 W. 79thStreet, Chanhassen, MN 55317SITE INFORMATIONPRESENT ZONING:  Business and Highway Services District, BHLAND USE:CommercialACREAGE:  0.91 acres APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 20, Article IV, Conditional Use PermitsChapter 20, Article XVII. Business and Highway Services DistrictBACKGROUND Frontier Development Park was approved by the Chanhassen Village Council on March 2, 1970.  A one­story, office­ retail building was constructed on the site in 1982­1983. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow a drive­thru pick­up window subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report, and adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact and Recommendation Development Review Application Development Narrative Traffic Study Site Pick­up Window Operation Site Plan 8­19­21 Grading Drainage Erosion Control Email Response Affidavit of Mailing CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: September 7, 2021 CC DATE: September 27, 2021 REVIEW DEADLINE: October 5, 2021 CASE #: 2021-18 BY: RG, EH, DN, JS, ET, MU SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a drive-through pick-up window for Crisp & Green. LOCATION: 530 West 79th Street, Unit 100 Lot 4, Block 1, Frontier Development Park APPLICANT: Jason Pinski OWNER: Brian Burdick Shingobee 530 W. 79th Street 669 N. Medina Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Loretto, MN 55357 Bburdick@burdickproperties.com 763-229-0571 jpinski@shigobee.com PRESENT ZONING: Highway and Business Services District (BH) 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial ACREAGE: 0.91 acres LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a drive-through facility for a pick-up window subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report, And, adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 Request for Conditional Use Permit September 7, 2021 Page 2 The City has limited discretion in approving or denying Conditional Use Permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow a drive-through pick-up window as part of their restaurant operation. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article IV, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article XVII. Business and Highway Services District BACKGROUND Frontier Development Park was approved by the Chanhassen Village Council on March 2, 1970. A one-story, office-retail building was constructed on the site in 1982-1983. SITE CONSTRAINTS Bluff Creek corridor This property is not located within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Wetland Protection There is not a wetland located on site. Bluff Protection There are no bluffs on the property. Shoreland Management The property is not located within a shoreland protection district. Floodplain Overlay This property is not within a federally designated floodplain. 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 Request for Conditional Use Permit September 7, 2021 Page 3 DISCUSSION The BH District allows fast food restaurants as a permitted use. However, a drive-through facility requires a conditional use permit. The applicant is proposing a drive-through pickup window as part of their restaurant. This drive- through is unique in that there is no menu board on-site, orders are placed on-line, via phone or with an app and payment is made virtually. Due to this operational model, the queuing for vehicles is reduced, leading to a reduction in the length of the drive-through stacking lane necessary for the operation. Based on the traffic study submitted with the application, the length of the vehicular stacking can be reduced to five cars from the required 12. It shall be a requirement of the CUP that only this restaurant business model for a drive-through pick-up window without a menu board and ordering system is permitted on the site. As part of the review of the proposed drive-through facility, staff must determine compliance with the specific criteria for conditional uses. Conditional Use Permit Criteria Sec 20-292 Drive-Through Facilities Drive-through facilities for any use shall comply with the following standards: 1. They shall not be located adjacent to any residential lot lines. *Drive-through is adjacent to a commercial parking lot. 2. They shall be provided with a suitable visual screen from adjacent properties. *Landscaping shall be installed along the western property line parallel to the drive- through. Along the west property line we suggest adding 2-3 columnar overstory trees in the wider sections of green space and tall grasses along the stacking spots. 3. Stacking shall be provided within applicable parking lot setbacks. *Stacking is accommodated within the existing vehicular circulation area. 4. Stacking shall meet the following standards: 1. Banks: Five vehicles (100 feet); 2. Coffee shops: 13 vehicles (260 feet); 3. Fast-food restaurant: 12 vehicles (240 feet); 4. Pharmacy: Four vehicles (80 feet); 5. Car washes: Four vehicles (80 feet); 6. Other uses: Four vehicles (80 feet). 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 Request for Conditional Use Permit September 7, 2021 Page 4 *The applicant submitted a traffic study regarding the required stacking for the pick-up window. Based on the study, five vehicle stacking is adequate to accommodate their peak hour stacking demand. 5. The City may require a vehicle stacking study to determine whether more or less stacking shall be required for a particular use. *A traffic study was submitted for review. 6. Stacking areas shall not interfere with vehicular circulation in the parking lot, nor encroach into any required drive aisles. *Due to the shortened stacking demand, the stacking area will not interfere with vehicular circulation on site. The site cannot accommodate a 12 vehicle stacking queue. 7. Speaker or intercom system shall not be audible at the property line. *No speaker or intercom is included in the drive-through pick-up window. ACCESS The site has two driveways onto West 79th Street. Access to the drive-through is from the east side of the building and circulates around the north side of the building terminating in the stacking area for the pick-up window on the west side of the building. 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 Request for Conditional Use Permit September 7, 2021 Page 5 PUBLIC FACILITIES City sewer, water and stormwater facilities and a public street are adequate for the planned pick- up window. The Engineering Department reviewed the Conditional Use Permit submittal for 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 (Crisp & Green). These comments are divided into two categories: general comments and proposed conditions of approval (Recommendation). General comments are informational points to guide the applicant in the proper planning of public works infrastructure for this project, to inform the applicant of possible extraordinary issues and/or to provide the basis for findings. Proposed conditions are requirements that the Engineering Department recommends be formally imposed on the developer in the final order. Note that references to the “City Standards” herein refer to the City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. General Comments/Findings 1. Any and all utility and transportation plans submitted with this application have been reviewed only for the purpose of determining the feasibility of providing utility and transportation facilities for the project in accordance with City Standards. A recommendation of Conditional Use Permit approval does not constitute final approval of details, including but not limited to alignments, materials and points of access, connection or discharge, that are depicted or suggested in the application. The applicant is required to submit detailed construction drawings for the project, as applicable. The City of Chanhassen Engineering and Public Works Departments will review plans, in detail, when they are submitted and approve, reject or require modifications to the plans or drawings based upon conformance with City Standards, the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances and the professional engineering judgment of the City Engineer. 2. It is the opinion of the Engineering Department that the proposed conditional use permit can be developed in accordance with the requirements of the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances (as it pertains to Engineering and Public Works requirements) and City Standards, provided it fully addresses the comments and conditions contained herein, and can be approved. 3. The applicant is proposing the installation of a drive-through pick-up window for a future fast-casual restaurant (Crisp & Green) in the existing building located at 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100. In consideration of this request, a traffic study conducted by SRF Consulting was provided which performed a review of the surrounding road network operations (existing condition and build condition), evaluation of projected trip generation, site access, and circulation within the site which included the proposed drive- through operations. The study concluded that the development is expected to generate 131 trips and 42 trips during midday peak hour (noon until 1 p.m.) and commuter peak hour (5-6 p.m.), respectively, which was characterized as a minimal traffic impact to the surrounding transportation network. Furthermore, it was determined that due to the characteristic of the drive-through pick-up window an anticipated design queue length 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 Request for Conditional Use Permit September 7, 2021 Page 6 would only be five cars during peak hours, which is less than a typical drive-through due to the fact that the drive-through pick-up window is only for pick-up of online orders. This anticipated queue length was found not to impede the operation of the existing users or block traffic circulation within the site. SRF Consulting did recommend pavement markings and signage to identify the pavement area assigned for pick-up window queues to avoid blocking or impeding other site-generated circulating traffic. There is also a need for “Do Not Enter” and “One Way” signage to further clarify site circulation. See proposed condition 1. COMPATIBLITY General Issuance Standards 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 Request for Conditional Use Permit September 7, 2021 Page 7 The Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the City Council shall issue such conditional use permits only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: (1) Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. (2) Will be consistent with the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and this chapter. (3) Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. (4) Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. (5) Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. (6) Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. (7) Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare due to excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents or trash. (8) Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. (9) Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. (10) Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. (11) Will not depreciate surrounding property values. (12) Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow a drive-through pick-up window subject to the following conditions: Building 1. Provide the City with a revised building plan showing the pick-up window. Engineering 1. The applicant shall submit a striping and signage plan that ensures proper site circulation for review and approval. 2. The applicant shall contact the City to ensure erosion control measures are in place prior to construction of the drive-through area. Planning 1. A menu board and ordering kiosk shall not be installed as part of the drive-through facility. 2. The drive-through facility shall only be permitted for a pick-up window. 530 W. 79th Street, Unit 100 Request for Conditional Use Permit September 7, 2021 Page 8 3. Landscaping shall be installed along the western property line parallel to the drive-through. A landscape plan shall be submitted for City review and approval. And adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Narrative 4. Traffic Study 5. Site Pick-up Widow Operation 6. Site Plan 8-19-21 7. C2 Grading Drainage and Erosion Control 8. Email Response 9. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-18 crisp & green cup for drive thru window\staff report crisp & green cup.docx CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Jason Pinski and Brian Burdick for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a drive-through pick-up window facility. On September 7, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Jason Pinski and Brian Burdick for a conditional use permit for the property located at 530 West 79th Street, Unit 100. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH). 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Commercial use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 4, Block 1, Frontier Development Park, Carver County, Minnesota. 4. Section 20-232: a. The proposed use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. Traffic circulation is contained on site and is adequately accommodated through appropriate signage and the type of service delivery b. The proposed use will be consistent with the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance. The development complies with City Code requirements and is consistent with the Commercial land use designation. c. The proposed use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. The proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. It is similar to other uses in the area. e. The proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed use will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community, but will promote economic development and be adequately served by existing public infrastructure. g. The proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. The use is consistent with other uses located along West 79th Street. h. The proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. The proposed use will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed use will not depreciate surrounding property values. l. The proposed use will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Article IV of the City Code. 5. The Planning report #2021-18 dated September 7, 2021, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to permit a drive-through pick-up window facility subject to the following conditions: Building 1. Provide the City with a revised building plan showing the pick-up window. Engineering 1. The applicant shall submit a striping and signage plan that ensures proper site circulation for review and approval. 2. The applicant shall contact the City to ensure erosion control measures are in place prior to construction of the drive-through area. Planning 1. A menu board and ordering kiosk shall not be installed as part of the drive-through facility. 2. The drive-through facility shall only be permitted for a pick-up window. 3. Landscaping shall be installed along the western property line parallel to the drive- through. A landscape plan shall be submitted for City review and approval. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 7th day of September, 2021. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY:___________________________________ Its, Chairman g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-18 crisp & green cup for drive thru window\findings of fact crisp & green.docx COHTUNITY DEI'ELOPIIENT DEPARTiIENT Plsnning Division - 7700 Ma*et Bouleverd Msihng Address - P.O Box 147. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone (952) 227-'1100 / Fax: (952)227-1110 Sub.nflalOet!L" fRofrr lo lhc rmropa.f! ApprErtp,, Crrcrdrs, lat Qqv,Gd E Comprehensive Plan Amendment . ..... . . ........ t600 E Minor MUSA line ior failing on-site sewers.....9100 E Conditional Use Permit (CUP) D Srngl+FamilyResidence .. .....................9325 El A[ others . ....... $425 I lntenm Use Permit (lUP) D ln conjunclaon with Single-Family Residence.. 3325 E alt otners . ..................... 3425 E Rezonrng (REZ )E Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 C Minor Amendment to existing PUD... ....... .....$100 E A others. .............. ..........3500 ! Sign Plan Revievv......... ...........t150 ! Site Ptan Review (SPR) E AdminisEative ..........................9100 D Commerciaulndustrial Districts'...................... $500 Plus $ 10 per 1.000 square feet of building area:( thousand square feet) 'lncluda nomb.r ol!!S149 employc€s - 'lnclucc numbcr ot 499 tmdoltes E Residential Districts......................... .............. S500 Plus $5 p€r dwelling unit ( units) E vacarion! Metes I Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) !! CITY OT CH,II{IIASSII{ APPLICATION FOR OEVELOPMENT REVIEW cc orrc 1L)?-l3L 6GD.v R!v.w D.rG Vacation of EasementyRight{f-way (VAC) (Addnb6.l llcording tur3 mrY .PPIY) Variance (VAR) . Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) to)el a-r 9300 5200 ................. $150 ............... $275 st]l.,rni .t inlo nrlan, lhet .rusl ffi.twt y lhis sfrlt abott) E subdivision (SUB)- E cr""t" i lots br less " s300 E create over 3 lots................. ... .i500 + $15 per lot( lots) Metes & Bounds (2 l"ts) . . ...... -. .$300 Consolidate 1ots.............-.......-..........'......... . .S150 Lot Line Adjust nent.................. ............ ........ 31 50 Final P|at.............. ........ ... ..9700 (lncludes 3450 escrow for attomey cosF)' iAdd(bnal ascrpr lrlsy bc rlquilld ,o, ohcr aPolrcalions through tha (hvclopmttrt contra€|. tr tr tr Dtr D D D D Single.Family Residence... All Others........................... E Notitication Sign (c'ty to lnst llsid llrrlov!) ........ $ Property Owne6' List within 500' (clty to gencntc .ft!r pr!{ppl€tion nrcting} ...... [0 Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)............... t--.' --EConotionrtu;"F';*ii - --tr'iiit"ri.useP;;i Variance Easements L_ easements) E Zoning Appeel ......,..................0100 E Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. SSOO M!IE: lthan m{lud. *Dllc.tloo |It proc..ttd co.tcumntty, lha rpp.lorl.t lba rhrll ba ch.read io. ..ch apDllcaion. $200 (lj addresses) ....... $3 per address .. $50 per document Agreernent Alteration Permit E Site PtantrtrWetland Deeds t 73TOTAL FEE: Section 1: Application Type (check all that applyl Section 2: Required lnlormation Descflptron ol Proposal J3o wer-l 1.r{ er}cce+ 5ui+6'+ 1ooProperty Address or Location Parcel *:Legal Oescription Total Acreage; Present Zoning Soloct One Wetlands Present? fl Yes ffi No n"g1on. Select One Requested Land Use Desig 161161. Select OnePresent Land Use Desig Existing Use of Property: lcirect box if separate narrative is attached PcDd,t_l'7_l_ul_ Requested Zoning:Seloct Ono Soction 3: Proporty Ownor and Applicant lnformation AppLlcANT OTHER THAN pROpERW OWNER: tn signing this application, l, as applicant, represent to have obtained ou[ronzeton lrom the property owner to file lhrs apptrcati-on iagree to be bound by condilions of approval, subiect only lo the nght to oblecl at the heanngs on the apphc€tion or during the appeal penod lf ihis application has not been signed by tne p perty owner. I nave atta|hed selaraie oocumentatio; ol full legal capacity lo file the application This application should be processed ,n .y n"." "nd iam ttre party wnom the City s[ould conlict regarding any matter pertaining to this apptrcatron I wr1 keep misetf rnformed of the deadirnes for submrision of material and the progress of this application I further understand that addilronal fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authonzatron to proceed wth the studi I cedid that lhe informairon and exhibits submltled are true and correct' Name SAsa ,v Pirrslt.Contact Phone 1bs-e?ct.of'|l -7b 3 -+ ".1 -34rr-n Cell Fax Date 2 -<O 41- Contact: Phone Address (olu { ^,1 me otiar )I Crty/State/Zrp l-o reL'to ,ir^r,j 5535? Emarl bc e. Srgnature Cell Fax Dale PROPERTY OWNER: ln srgnrng thrs apphcatron, l, as property owner. have tull legal capacity to, and hereby do, authonze the filng ol thrs afplicition. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those condrtrons. sublit only to the nght lo object at lhe hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlnes ,or submrssron of matenal and the progresgof this application. I further understand thal additional fees may be charged for consultrng fees. leasibility studies, etc with an estimate prior to any aulhorization lo proceed with the study I oertrty that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. n. .BR.tAxt l). firtanrc,t< contact:y'|.,* rl "( Address fz.. l,t/..+'vt 4 A-,-*-enone:(ol 2 - tul -oSZll-7 Emarl Srgn t <o This applEaton must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all inlonnation and plans required by applicable Crty Ordinance provEions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropnate Application Checktist and conter wth the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procrdural requirements and fees A determrnatron of completeness of the apphcalion shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal wntten notice of applcation deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. A Section 4: Notilication lnformation Who should roceive copies of rtaff repoat3? ! Property Owner Via: ! Email 'Othcr Contrct lnfomafl on: Name:! npdrcant Ma f] Engineer ViaE otner Etr Emarl Email Via; ! Email I Maiteo Paper Copy! Maited Paper copy D Uaiteo Paper Copy D Maited Paper Copy City/State/Zip: Email: Address INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT devrce PRINT FORM and dehver copy to the crty for pocessrng : Complete all necessary lorm fields, then select SAVE FORM to sav€ a copy to city along with required docurnents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to sond to yDur a dlgltal sAvE FORU SUAUT FORT'PRII{T FORII cry/sratezip: PROJECT ENGII{EER (if appl&rable) Name: _ Address _ city/srate/zip: Emarl: Cell: Fax: I6h The Cornerstone Hello We believe the 12 general standard bullet points have been met in the SRF study. The pickup window will not endanger the public. lt will help with the traffic. The aesthetics and design of the exterior will not change due to the pickup window. The community will benefit in many ways and nothing new to the exterior of the building will change the way the water, sewer and any other public service work in the community. The vehicles will be using the property in the best way it can as Iaid out in the traffic study. The pickup window will not depreciate the surrounding property values. Please read the SRF traffic study and findings. We believe all the criteria is met to move forward with the Pickup window. Thank you ! Jason Pinski Construction I Proiect Management I Real Estate Development 669 North Medina Street PO. Box 8 Loreno, MN 55357 763.479.1300 763.479.3267 hx www.shingobee.com lntegrity. Memorandum www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Fax: 1.866.440.6364 An Equal Opportunity Employer SRF No. 02 114711 To: Dean Villella | CEO | CRISP GREEN , G&G4U, LLC Erik Koenig | Senior Project Manager | Shingobee From: Jeff Bednar, TOPS, Senior Traffic Engineering Specialist Date: June 30, 202 1 Subject: C RISP GREEN | Traffic Study | Chanhassen, Minnesota Introduction This traffic study has been completed for the proposed Crisp & Green development in the City of Chanhassen (see Figure 1). The main objectives of the study are to review existing operations, evaluate trip generation, access, and circulation within the site, including the proposed drive -thru operations, and recommend improvements to ensure safe and efficient operations. A summary of the traffic study findings, conclusions and recommendations can be found on page 13 of this memorandum. Existing Conditions The existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline to identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes data collection efforts and intersection capacity analys es. The following information summarizes the existing conditions. Traffic Data Collection Existing weekday midday and p.m. peak period vehicular turning movement volumes were estimated at the following study intersections. Note that traffic data collection activities were conducted during May 2021 and were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with traffic volumes estimated to be approximately 15 to 25 percent lower than normal conditions for the study area. Therefore, a Post-COVID-19 estimate of the study area background traffic volumes was developed based on the newly collected turning movement counts as well as Pre-COVID-19 traffic counts from; MnDOT for the Highway 5 intersections (2019), and the City of Chanhassen including; the Chanhassen Chick -fil -A Traffic Impact Analysis (2016 , HRGreen) and the Market Boulevard Corridor Study (2016 , Kimley -Horn). This Post-COVID-19 estimate of the study area background traffic volumes was used as a surrogate for the existing (2021) traffic volumes and build condition background traffic volumes. • Highway 5/Great Plains Boulevard • Highway 5/Market Boulevard • Great Plains Boulevard/West 79 th Street • Market Boulevard/West 79th Street • West 79th Street /East Site Access • West 79th Street/West Site Access Figure 1 Project Location C RISP GREEN , Chanhassen | Traffic Study G&G4U, LLC. | City of Chanhassen H:\Projects\14711\TS\Figures\Figure1 02114711 June 2021 N Proposed Site Hwy 5 / Arboretum Blvd Market Blvd Market Blvd W 78th St Chanhassen Rd Dell Rd Dell Rd Powers Blvd Powers Blvd Kerber Blvd Note: Existing conditions peak hour volumes shown represent estimated Post -COVID -19 conditions and are based on Pre-COVID -19 traffic counts from; MnDOT for the Highway 5 intersections (2019), the Chanhassen Chick -fil-A Traffic Impact Analysis (2016 HRGreen) and the Market Boulevard Corridor Study (2016 Kimley-Horn). Figure 2 Existing Conditions C RISP GREEN , Chanhassen | Traffic Study G&G4U, LLC. | City of Chanhassen H:\Projects\14711\TS\Figures\Figure2 02114711 June 2021 N Great Plains Blvd Midday Peak Hour Vol. 110 (215) 1020 (1540) 130 (295) Market (200) 225 (1020) 1000 (235) 105 (140) 175 (360) 305 (100) 85 100 (205) 245 (275) 180 (275) (15) 15 (360) 285 (95) 90 10 (15) 10 (5) 40 (20) 50 (30) 190 (350) 180 (205) (70) 45 (5) 10 (135) 160 (120) 105 (1175) 1030 (70) 140 140 (170) 100 (140) 100 (120) 215 (325) 1040 (1790) 140 (215) (235) 280 (140) 85 (140) 120 Traffic Signal Control Market Hwy 5 Hwy 5 W 79th St Great Plains Great Plains Great Plns Great Plns Hwy 5 Hwy 5 Dean Villella | CEO | Crisp Green, G&G4U, LLC June 30, 2021 Erik Koenig | Senior Project Manager | Shingobee Page 4 Roadway Characteristics A field assessment was completed to identify various roadway characteristics within the transportation system study area, such as functional classification, general configuration, and posted speed limit. A summary of these roadway characteristics is shown in Table 1 . Note that these are general characteristics and that there are some deviations within portions of roadway segments. Table 1. Existing Roadway Characteristics (1) Functional Classification based on MnDOT’s Functional Classification GIS. The Highway 5/Great Plains Boulevard and Highway 5 /Market Boulevard intersections are traffic signal controlled, while the four other study intersections are unsignalized with side -street stop control. Existing geometrics, traffic controls, and traffic volumes in the study area are shown in Figure 2. Existing Intersection Traffic Operations/Capacity Analysis An existing intersection traffic operations/capacity analysis was completed t o establish baseline conditions to which future traffic operations can be compared. The capacity analysis was completed for the midday and p.m. peak hours at the study intersections using Synchro/SimTraffic traffic simulation model. Capacity analysis resul ts identify a Level of Service (LOS) which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay thre shold values shown in Table 2. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles experiencing minimal delays. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. Overall intersection LOS A through D are generally considered acceptable by drivers in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. For side-street stop-controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side -street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side- street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This considers the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capa bility of the intersection to support these volumes. Roadway Functional Classification (1) General Configuration Posted Speed Limit (mph) Trunk Highway (TH) 5 Minor Arterial Multi-lane divided 55 Great Plains Boulevard Minor Arterial Multi-lane divided 30 Market Boulevard Minor Arterial Multi-lane divided/Multi-lane undivided 30 West 79 th Street Local Road 2-lane undivided 30 Dean Villella | CEO | Crisp Green, G&G4U, LLC June 30, 2021 Erik Koenig | Senior Project Manager | Shingobee Page 5 Second, it is important to consider delay on the minor approach. Since mainline traffic does not stop, most of the delay is attributed to the side -street approaches. It is typical of intersections wi th higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high levels of delay (i.e. poor levels of service) on the side - street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. Table 2. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections LOS Designation Signalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) A ≤ 10 ≤ 10 B > 10 - 20 > 10 - 15 C > 20 - 35 > 15 - 25 D > 35 - 55 > 25 - 35 E > 55 – 80 > 35 – 50 F > 80 > 50 Results of the existing traffic operations analysis, shown in Table 3, indicate that all study intersections operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the midday (12 -1 p.m.) and p.m. (5-6 p.m.) peak hours under existing traffic control and intersection geometric s. However, the eastbound left - turn at the Great Plains Boulevard/West 79th Street intersection operates at LOS F, and the westbound left -turn at the Market Boulevard/West 79th Street intersection operates at LOS E. The southbound left-turn 95th percentile queues at the Great Plains Boulevard/Highway 5 intersection, currently spill back to and beyond the West 79th Street intersection during the midday (12 -1 p.m.) and p.m. (5 -6 p.m.) peak hours. The southbound left-turn 95th percentile queues at the and Market Boulevard/Highway 5 intersection, currently spill back to the West 79th Street intersection during the p.m. (5 -6 p.m.) peak hour. Note that the midday and p.m. peak hour 95th percentile queues for the worst approaches are also reported in Table 3. Table 3. Existing Peak Hour Traffic Operations/Capacity Analysis Study Intersection Midday Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue Highway 5/Great Plains Boulevard (1) B 20 sec. SB LT/15 D 40 sec. SBLT/20 Highway 5/Market Boulevard (1) C 29 sec. SBLT/10 D 41 sec. SBLT/15 Great Plains Boulevard/West 79th Street (2) A/D 30 sec. EBLT/1 A/F 74 sec. EBLT/3 Market Boulevard/West 79th Street (2) A/D 28 sec. WBLT/2 A/E 39 sec. WBLT/3 West 79th Street/East Site Driveway (2) A/B 13 sec. SB/1 A/B 14 sec. SB/1 West 79th Street/West Site Driveway (2) A/B 10 sec. SB/1 A/B 11 sec. SB/1 (1) Indicates a traffic signal -controlled intersection, where the overall LOS and average delay per vehicle are shown. The queue shown is the 95th percentile queue (in vehicles) for the worst side-street approach at the intersection . (2) Indicates a side -street stop-controlled intersection, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side-street approach average delay per vehicle. The queue shown is the 95th percentile queue (in vehicles) for the worst approach at the interse ction. The 95th percentile queue s shown in red bold font spill back to and beyond the adjacent upstream intersection. Dean Villella | CEO | Crisp Green, G&G4U, LLC June 30, 2021 Erik Koenig | Senior Project Manager | Shingobee Page 6 Proposed Development The site of the proposed Crisp & Green development is generally the westmost 3,000 square feet of currently unoccupied/vacant space (formerly Cheers Wine & Spirits) in the 79th Street Center, and was assumed to be completed and occupied by late 2021 to early 2022 . The proposed development consists of a healthy fast -casual restaurant offering a sustainable chef- crafted me nu, featuring: made-to-order salads with homemade dressings, naturally raised meats and fish, grain bowls, smoothies and seasonal sides and includes indoor seating for 50 patrons plus a pick - up window. Food services available include carry-out, delivery, pick-up and dine-in. The City of Chanhassen is specifically concerned with the operation of the pick -up window and its interaction and impact on the existing cleaners/laundry drive -up drop-off and pick up. The city also desires evaluation of the proposed pick -up window, assuming potential future conversion to a fast -food restaurant. Crisp & Green can be characterized as a fast-casual , sit-down restaurant. Most customers (70 percent) typically order online with fewer customers (30 percent) ordering at the rest a urant. The menu generally contains higher quality made to order food items with fewer frozen or processed ingredients than fast - food restaurants. The proposed development concept site plan is illustrated in Figure 3 . Access to the proposed development site is planned at the two site driveway locations on West 79th Street. Traffic Forecasts Trip Generation Estimates Trip generation estimates for weekday midday peak hour (12-1 p.m.) and p.m. commuter peak hour (5-6 p.m.) plus daily trips were made for the proposed development and a potential future fast-food conversion comparison, were based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The proposed development will not be open for breakfast, therefore , the a.m. peak hour was not included in the analysis. The midday peak hour (12-1 p.m.) trips were estimated based on ITE peak hour of generator data. The p.m. commuter peak hour (5 -6 p.m.) trips were estimated based on ITE p.m. peak hour of adjacent street data. Results of the trip generation estimate shown in Table 4 indicate that the proposed Crisp & Green development is expected to generate a total of 131 midday peak hour (12 -1 p.m.) trips, 42 p.m. commuter peak hour (5-6 p.m.) trips, and 946 daily trip ends (50 percent in/50 percent out). Table 4. Trip Generation Estimates – Proposed Development | Potential Future Conversion Land Use (ITE Land Use Code) Gross Square Feet Midday Peak Hour (12-1 p.m.) PM Commuter Peak Hour (5-6 p.m.) Daily Trip Ends In Out In Out Fast-Casual Restaurant w/ Pick -Up Window (1) (930) 3,000 60 71 23 19 946 Fast-Food Restaurant w / Drive-Through (2) (93 4) 3,000 79 75 51 47 1,413 (1) The proposed Crisp & Green development was assumed as a Fast-Casual Restaurant with Pick-Up Window. (2) Typical Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive -Through included for potential future conversion comparison and for use in site drive -through queuing/circulation analysis. Figure 3 Proposed Site Plan C RISP GREEN , Chanhassen | Traffic Study G&G4U, LLC. | City of Chanhassen H:\Projects\14711\TS\Figures\Figure3 02114711 June 2021 N Dean Villella | CEO | Crisp Green, G&G4U, LLC June 30, 2021 Erik Koenig | Senior Project Manager | Shingobee Page 8 Development-Generated Traffic Forecast Assignment The directional trip distribution for the proposed development and site -generated peak hour trips , as shown in Figure 4, was developed based on the regional distribution of households and employment, existing study area travel patterns, and engineering judgment. Based on this directional distribution, new trips generated by the proposed development were assigned to the existing traffic on the supporting roadway network for the Development Build Conditions and are shown in Figure 5 . Development Build Conditions Intersection Traffic Operations/Capacity Analysis The Build Conditions intersection traffic operations/capacity analysis was completed to determine future traffic operations and development -generated traffic impacts . The capacity analysis was completed for the midday and p.m. peak hours at the study intersections using Synchro/SimTraffic traffic simulation model. Results of the Development Build Conditions traffic operations analysis are shown in Table 5 . Development Build Conditions The Development Build Conditions traffic operations analysis results , shown in Table 5 , indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the midday (12 -1 p.m.) and p.m. (5-6 p.m.) peak hours under existing traffic control and intersection geometrics . While delay and queuing on West 79 th Street for the eastbound and westbound left -turning vehicles at Great Plains Boulevard and Market Boulevard, respectively, are expected to increase somewhat , the proposed Crisp & Green restaurant site-generated traffic impacts can be characterized as minimal . The northbound Great Plains Boulevard left-turn queues at West 79th Street , including the development of the proposed Crisp & Green restaurant , are not expected to spill back into the traffic signal -controlled intersection at Great Plains Boulevard/Highway 5 . Table 5. Development Build Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Operations/Capacity Analysis Study Intersection Midday Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue Highway 5/Great Plains Boulevard (1) C 21 sec. SBLT/17 D 41 sec. SBLT/22 Highway 5/Market Boulevard (1) C 30 sec. SBLT/10 D 42 sec. SBLT/16 Great Plains Boulevard/West 79th Street (2) A/E 3 8 sec. EBLT/2 A/F 90 sec. EBLT/4 Market Boulevard/West 79th Street (2) A/E 36 sec. WBLT/3 A/E 45 sec. WBLT/3 West 79 th Street/East Site Driveway (2) A/C 16 sec. SB/1 A/B 15 sec. SB/1 West 79 th Street/West Site Driveway (2) A/B 12 sec. SB/1 A/B 12 sec. SB/1 (1) Indicates a traffic signal -controlled intersection, where the overall LOS and average delay per vehicle are shown. The queue shown is the 95th percentile queue (in vehicles) for the worst side-street approach at the intersection . (2) Indicates a side-street stop-controlled intersection, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side-street approach average delay per vehicle. The queue shown is the 95th percentile queue (in vehicles) for the worst side-street approach at the intersection. The 95th percentile queues shown in red bold font spill back to and beyond the adjacent upstream intersection. Figure 4 Development -Generated Trip Directional Distribution and Hourly Volumes C RISP GREEN , Chanhassen | Traffic Study G&G4U, LLC. | City of Chanhassen H:\Projects\14711\TS\Figures\Figure4 02114711 June 2021 N Great Plains Blvd Midday Peak Hour Vol. Market Traffic Signal Control Market Hwy 5 Hwy 5 W 79th St Great Plains Great Plains Great Plns Great Plns Hwy 5 Hwy 5 5% 10% (0) 0 (0) 0 (5) 15 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 25 (15) (5) 15 (0) 0 (15) 30 (10) 25 (5) 5 (0) 0 (0) 0 (5) 10 (5) 15 20 (10) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 (5) 0 (0) (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (5) 15 (0) 0 (0) 0 Note: Development build conditions peak hour volumes shown represent estimated Post-COVID -19 conditions plus the Crisp & Green site-generated traffic volumes. Figure 5 Development Build Conditions CRISP GREEN, Chanhassen | Traffic Study G&G4U, LLC. | City of Chanhassen H:\Projects\14711\TS\Figures\Figure5 02114711 June 2021 N Great Plains Blvd Midday Peak Hour Vol. 110 (215) 930 (1540) 130 (295) Market (205) 240 (1020) 1000 (235) 105 (140) 175 (365) 315 (105) 100 100 (205) 255 (280) 180 (275) (15) 15 (360) 285 (100) 105 10 (15) 10 (5) 40 (20) 50 (30) 190 (350) 205 (220) (75) 60 (5) 10 (150) 190 (120) 105 (1175) 1030 (70) 140 140 (170) 105 (145) 100 (120) 235 (335) 1040 (1790) 140 (215) (245) 305 (145) 90 (140) 120 Traffic Signal Control Market Hwy 5 Hwy 5 W 79th St Great Plains Great Plains Great Plns Great Plns Hwy 5 Hwy 5 Dean Villella | CEO | Crisp Green, G&G4U, LLC June 30, 2021 Erik Koenig | Senior Project Manager | Shingobee Page 11 Proposed Site Pick-Up Window/Circulation Review Site Pick-Up Window Traffic Operations A review of the proposed Crisp & Green development concept site plan (see Figure 3 ) was completed to identify issues specific to the proposed pick -up window operation and recommend potential improvements regarding pick-up window queuing spillback and site circulation. Based on ITE and local traffic study data, the 95th percentile or design queue (in vehicles) developing from a fast-food restaurant drive-through operation has been field measured at an average of 15 percent of the total peak hour inbound traffic volume generated by the fast -food restaurant with drive - through. However, field observed pick -up window queuing data was not available for Fast -Casual Restaurant w/Pick-Up Window, therefore, the design queue for the proposed Crisp & Green development was based on data provided by Crisp & Green. Since Crisp & Green will not use a menu board or pay window (all done online), the estimated pick -up window vehicle dwell time (speed of service) is only 20-30 seconds, compared to 60-90 seconds, or more, for fast -food drive -through. Results of the Pick -Up Window /Drive-Through design queue estimates, shown in Table 5, indicate that the proposed Crisp & Green development is expected to generate a design queue of 5 vehicles during the midday peak hour (12 -1 p.m.). For comparison, a potential future conversion of the proposed Crisp & Green development to fast -food restaurant with drive-through could be expected to generate a design queue of 12 vehicles during the midday peak hour (12 -1 p.m.). Table 6. Pick-Up Window/Drive-Through Operations – Design Queue Estimates Land Use (ITE Land Use Code) Midday Peak Hour (12-1 p.m.) PM Commuter Peak Hour (5-6 p.m.) In bound Trips Design Queue Inbound Trips Design Queue Fast-Casual Restaurant w / Pick -Up Window (1) (930) 60 5 23 2 Fast-Food Restaurant w / Drive-Through (2) (93 4) 79 12 51 8 (1) The proposed Crisp & Green development was assumed as a Fast-Casual Restaurant with Pick-Up Window. (2) Typical Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through included for possible future conversion comparison and for use in site drive-through queuing/circulation analysis. Based on these Pick -Up Window /Drive-Through design queue estimates for the proposed Crisp & Green development and the potential future conversion of the proposed development to fast -food restaurant with drive -through, design queues were plotted on the proposed development concept site plan (see Figure 6 ). A review of these development generated pick -up window design queues indicates that the proposed Crisp & Green pick-up window would not be a factor in blocking or otherwise impeding the operation of the existing laundry drop -off/pick -up drive -through or of other site - generated circulating traffic. It is recommended that the proposed development Pick-Up Window lane be marked, striped and signed to identify the pavement area assigned and avoid potential blocking of other site-generated circulating and parked traffic (see Figure 6). Figure 6 Site Pick -Up Window Operation Queuing Spillback | Site Circulation Analysis CRISP GREEN, Chanhassen | Traffic Study G&G4U, LLC. | City of Chanhassen H:\Projects\14711\TS\Figures\Figure6 02114711 June 2021 N Pick-Up Window CRISP & GREEN Pick-Up Window Maximum Queue (5 Vehicles) Traditional Fast-Food Drive-Thru Window Maximum Queue (12 Vehicles) Double Painted Line Wait Here To Enter Pick-Up Window Lane When Full Double Painted Line Dean Villella | CEO | Crisp Green, G&G4U, LLC June 30, 2021 Erik Koenig | Senior Project Manager | Shingobee Page 13 Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations Based on this proposed Crisp & Green Development traffic study and analysis, the following summary of findings, conclusions and recommendations is offered for your consideration: 1. All study intersections operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the midday (12 -1 p.m.) and p.m. (5 -6 p.m.) peak hours under existing traffic control and intersection geometrics. However, the eastbound left -turn at the Great Plains Boulevard/West 79th Street intersection operates at LOS F, and the westbound left -turn at the Market Boulevard/West 79th Street intersection operates at LOS E. 2. Southbound left-turn 95th percentile queues at the Great Plains Boulevard/Highway 5 intersection, currentl y spill back to and beyond the West 79th Street intersection during the midday (12 -1 p.m.) and p.m. (5 -6 p.m.) peak hours. The southbound left -turn 95th percentile queues at the and Market Boulevard/Highway 5 intersection, currently spill back to the West 79th Street intersection during the p.m. (5 -6 p.m.) peak hour 3. The site of the proposed Crisp & Green development is generally the westmost 3,000 square feet of currently unoccupied/vacant space (formerly Cheers Wine & Spirits) in the 79th Street Center. The proposed development consists of a healthy fast -casual restaurant offering a sustainable chef- crafted menu, featuring: made -to-order salads with homemade dressings, naturally raised meats and fish, grain bowls, smoothies and seasonal sides and inclu des indoor seating for 50 patrons plus a pick -up window with online ordering and payment . 4. Access to the proposed Crisp & Green development site is planned at the two site driveway locations on West 79th Street. 5. The proposed Crisp & Green development is expected to generate a total of 131 midday peak hour (12 -1 p.m.) trips, 42 p.m. commuter peak hour (5-6 p.m.) trips, and 946 daily trip ends (50 percent in/50 percent out). 6. The directional trip distribution for the proposed development was developed based on the regional distribution of households and employment, existing study area travel patterns, and engineering judgment. Based on this directional distribution, new trips generated by the proposed development were assigned to the existing traffic on the supporting roadway network for the Development Build Conditions . 7. The Development Build Conditions traffic operations analysis results indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better du ring the midday (12 -1 p.m.) and p.m. (5 -6 p.m.) peak hours under existing traffic control and intersection geometrics. The delay and queuing on West 79th Street for the eastbound and westbound approach left-turning vehicles at Great Plains Boulevard and Market Boulevard, respectively, are expected to increase only slightly, therefore, the proposed Crisp & Green site- generated traffic impacts can be characterized as minimal. Dean Villella | CEO | Crisp Green, G&G4U, LLC June 30, 2021 Erik Koenig | Senior Project Manager | Shingobee Page 14 8. The northbound Great Plains Boulevard left -turn queues at West 79th Street, including the proposed Crisp & Green restaurant site -generated trips, are not expected to spill back into the traffic signal -controlled intersection at Great Plains Boulevard/Highway 5 . 9. A review of the proposed Crisp & Green development concept site plan was completed to identify issues specific to the proposed pick-up window and recommend potential improvements regarding pick-up window queuing spillback and site circulation. 10. Based on ITE and local traffic study data, the 95th percentile or design queue (in vehicles) developing from a fa st-food restaurant drive -through operation has been field measured at an average of 15 percent of the total peak hour inbound traffic volume generated by the fast -food restaurant with drive -through. However, field observed pick-up window queuing data was not available for Fast -Casual Restaurant w ith Pick -Up Window, therefore, the design queue for the proposed Crisp & Green development was based on data provided by Crisp & Green. Since Crisp & Green will not use a menu board or pay window (all done online), the estimated pick -up window vehicle dwell time (speed of service) is only 20 -30 seconds, compared to 60 -90 seconds, or more, for fast -food drive -through. 11. Results of the Pick -Up Window/Drive -Through design queue estimate s indicate that the proposed Crisp & Green development is expected to generate a design queue of 5 vehicles during the midday peak hour (12 -1 p.m.). For comparison, a potential future conversion of the proposed Crisp & Green development to fast -food restaurant with drive -through could be expected to generate a design queue of 12 vehicles during the midday peak hour (12 -1 p.m.). 12. A review of the development generated pick -up window design queues indicates that the proposed Crisp & Green pick-up window would not be a factor in blocking or otherwise impeding the operation of the existing laundry drop-off/pick-up drive -through or other site-generated circulating or parked traffic. The proposed restaurant site -generated pick-up window trips are not expected to spill back into the East Site Driveway /West 79th Street intersection. 13. It is recommended that the proposed development Pick -up window lane be marked, striped and signed to identify the pavement area assigned and avoid potential blocking or impeding of other site-generated circulating traffic as shown in Figure 6 . 14. Based on this proposed Crisp & Green Development traffic study and analysis, it is concluded that the proposed development would generate a modest level of new traffic, resulting in no significant degradation in peak period traffic operations and levels of service. Therefore, the City of Chanhassen may consider the proposed Crisp & Green Development, without concern that it would represent a significant negative traffic impact to the supporting area roadway system or existing site circulation and traffic operations . H:\Projects\14000\14711\TraffStudy\Reports\Report\14711_Crisp&Green_TS_210630.docx From:Dean Villella To:Generous, Bob; DEAN VILLELLA; Daniel Sheehy Subject:Crisp & Green Chanhassen Date:Friday, August 27, 2021 9:36:58 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning Bob, I thought I would send you a quick email to help explain how our proposed curbside pick up window will operate at our Crisp & Green fast casual restaurant. This pick up window will operate very similar to how other restaurants utilize curbside pickup. Generally speaking, other restaurants will reserve a handful of dedicated parking spots for curbside pickup. Customers order in advance and call the store once they have arrived in those dedicated parking spots. Our curbside pick up window will require our customers to preorder their food on our online application with the time they plan to pick it up. The customer then drives up to our curbside pick up window at their scheduled time and provides their name to our employee. The employee will simply hand the customer their bag of food and thank them for the business. There will NOT be any ordering at the pick up window. There will NOT be any payment at the pick up window. With this said, I am projecting the average time a customer is at our pick up window to be less than 10 seconds. With this type of speed in processing, we do not anticipate any significant back up at the curbside pickup window of more than a few cars at any time. Once the curbside pick up window is operational it will allow us to remove the need for dedicated curbside pick up parking spots. The pick up window will also provide the necessary relief on our overall parking in the mall. The convenience of being able to pick up their food without ever getting out of their cars will be valuable to the community. Fewer, slip and falls etc… Especially with the COVID-19 spiking once again. I’m confident that our curbside pick up window will really be appreciated by the Chanhassen community. If you have any additional questions or concerns regarding our curbside pick up window, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks again, Dean Villella CEO - C&G4ME LLC 952.201.6110 mobile Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COLTNTY OF CARVER ) T ssen, City C Subscribed and thiACi-6u, o S to before me JEAI M SIECKLING Notary tuUb,lf hneota l'ffirEtrr..b!1, eca Notary Public 2021. I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on August 26,2021, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk ofthe City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing to Consider a Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Drive-Through Pick Up Window at 530 W. 79'h Street, Suite 100 (Crisp & Green), Zoned Highway and Business Senices District (BII), Planning Case No.2021-18 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses ofsuch owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Cawer County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. ( Subiect Parcel Dbcl.iinor This map is neather a legally recorded map nor a suNey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, infomalion and datia located in vadous city, county, state and federal ofrces and other sources rcgading the area shown, aM is to be used lor reference purposes only The CiV does not \Nanant that the Geographic lniormatbn System (GlS) Oata used lo prepere this map are enor free. and the City does not epresent that the GIS Data can be used for navigatjonal, t.acking or any other purpose equidng exactino measurement of distance or direction or precGion in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disdaamer is provided pu6uant to Minnesota Statutes 5466.03. Subd- 21 (2000), and the user of this map adnowledges that the City shall not be liable ior any damages. and epressly waiv6 all daims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold hamless ihe City from any and all claims bought by user, its employees or agents, or thhd partes which adse out of the use/s access or use of alata provided. Subject Parcel Oilcl,lmot This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended lo be used as one. Thi! map is a compaletion of rccords, infomation and data located in vaious cily, county, state and lederalofices and other sources regarding th€ area shown, and is to be used for rcference pu.poses only. The City does not warant that the Geographic lniormation Syslem (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are eror free. and the City clo€s not repfesenl that the Gls oala can be used for navigalional, track,ng or any other puDose requirino exactjno measurement of distance o. direclion or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided puEuant to Minnesota StaMes 5466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user ol lhis map aclnowledges tlat the City shall not be tiable for any damages, and expressly waives atl claims, and ag.ees lo defend, indemnify. and hold harmless the Cily hom any and all daims blought by User, its employees or agents, or third parti6 which arise out of the use/s access or use of data provided. t \ I /.t 4 ..- q <TAX_NAMEI <TAX_ADD_LI r (TAX_ADD_L2D (Next RecordxTAX_NAirlEr ITAX_AD D_Ll r ITAX_ADD_L2r t i! \ 4E;Z ',i I l.- ) -- ru o qd, O-oo5OcJo 6€ c.r IohiN! rjg 8EF0) E3o- @E (o=Ets Orf6 E e 11, =ooFt- 6 o) -o Eo o oc foo G --O (E 3o_ (so) 9E -NE. SEfr o.r (! =l?o5 EJ nEa d.9 .0 o: =6li5==O: q) o EcD E iH EE EeooEEPofAi E,E E6TZX-> o)(55= .g o- co o o oE !c o o! Oa:E .=o5L@2 oloe!!u)a 6rEF-c.o>=>6ot rn< o 0) 0o, oE c) a .9.E tl)Eeio.0r-cO -^ .) A E-EE es .i SEeE EteE gEEg EEE$ IIEE EEEE s*;r ;=fi= ggEEigEE o.!2-c.= aot<)to E-.9, q +E O"O+:.:CFOcLr(,,-Nrr$ E oootI oo3 =BtE.;Ei$ Efi;Ecsef iTEIEes=EB EiiHEIEEPEE EESlsEls€EItc aaE|iBiiE=gE EEiIEEHgE$EE o oIp o) = =o o) =ool_c ooor6-qfE EEob thc 8E 1'Eccoo)aQ9Hf-ccc'F(!E_c-o 6qi=(,, <8l tlio!c o, CD(5 CDc It)o EcoE =c .o oo =oc o o Ec G E c) o oo 0.) o o,f .9o =UIz EE E E E b E _9 E aI a o o .JoJ :j Goo CLo o- t!I o CL iio ;o oILI o. >trt.9 o-Geto-J I iit 6J .= o-Xfi+,o(!E >G c6 ..o9ECoq, t=OE3Ogc, t, 'aoo = EDO .c_'-o E.EoFJ-E .9o =o, E')o- .=oEoa!.9d OE23 oo q(,Eo !2 d) n) oot--r.-ti c)-o EoE(J oc5o oI O !-9!6c)e5 -N'er o Y'r t.5 09oE E .0 .i, 6(): ErHhi=O: rDo E@;>BE oo) EE E606 H'9E h9>:-c 6E;Eb.=.e()€I ! ,=Lco G E l d) c(! d] ds o !4E o oE OO PEo9 =i! =L@2 E6.b -9(D o, -o, EF-t.6 =;o8 Lr)< c).c -ox€EsE 2e E6 Oti E EsE,g --== gEig gE:E Es qE 3;'e H:: x..e 9 Er; ?EsE g-snE:s E;ET 6ET3*;5t5 E E (E.E; 3 U:E 9E€ E; B-gE-: = FEE q *gA* sH#,EFgEd65gFOc(J(,)FN(r,s =r, izB E -E g t E$;sE srf e.iEaEeEEi E H3E EIE EgEfi igi|HElEfiEEi EEBI'-EIEEEI'ae E e'38 il€ t; = eE aEtl;HiEgfEE sEiIgEH$Ef;EE 9qr 9: F. O- o,oEOcrao 6€ NPo6-6tE rjg 39 5co- (/,b;s EE C)!.:, s G' E F o5 o C'o o .B(,oJ Eloo ELo o. oo o o,E]o E(, CIIG >ctooEo-o E! 96 !, .= o-xfl=-(,o.c =r .6 ..oBEE.99 6=OE:ooc, GEc(l) o) o)ocvEO EoEC EE;g 2-a0.>6o€e-. =eQ.9or 5E 3 -oo 3 i-E o o.i'6 (!6 cl,codq9E:(l)- Eo=:EEb EEtr rcccEq.g, -.'ra ui .= =g:UJX-z E; iliEiiEE:iisiiii iggiiiigIiiigEiEE6. € f coco dl (, i: c6 (, (!o EDc (,o =Ercao L|,,oa,a, .=IEoE=o de ot eEE.L =6ott(! a! .Co O O O O O O O O -l f..] O C) O O O O O O O O = - 6 - N 6 (n i.{.\J.'r.{ r\/ tt !'{ Fr !"r Fl <t r!83F88898888888888888- 6r./) 6 6r dr 6 F- @ o lD o F ot in \o r! o oO la; + J i6 + A 6 F. \6 dr !t o F. a ao ur 1l1 ot ro F.X n o i..r 6 ao N Fr rb <t N .! at r\r @ N cO @ 6JZ !,.t l^ !'t !n r, ur Ln Ln lJ) u) Lrl rt) lrl rJl lJl 1l1 .n lrl u) l,) d N r\ t\ a! N f\l l.\l a\l f\l l\ .\l a\ f\l (\ N N a{ a\l c{ a\ =F -Fgr F.o 6 z s;ts =B=BBB0=3EFEEFF=LFA Lo > L. V t^'vr',n 9 : t" ---z-a---E=--FFFFZI-I-l-4=IFan an r, an : co atr (h a lJ or qr Nt\IFAF\F.NZANF\ -{oFr..1Ot-iOOOOO.{(n6bO<f(aul<tqrFlJ)Osllri !,.l F- < r.r) Ln t 6 ur sl (o s 6 @ za-BBdL"3EEKEE ^--t4e-obobr(J=bl<Nr\ozNP!"rOOOOEsrootola(, r/1 vl F- rr1 L i 3aEEaHiaEBaigaAEHiaa .Eo9urri Ee o chEp _ 5{ .( u :a2z rE-HI-E i"3= ursl;=2 = * ttt;ag (Dcr< - - -;;qEEE!fiHHET6?EEEHIEg?HH::dl;!!dEEHE{55555lv 6.v o v rJ) O 2 - O v) :: (r\ O _ .6 ao ra ao dl>99RCRS383RP;XBtoooooF.-{i;iic{Nolns1 sr 6 F. € oo qr o- .! .L cL o- !>o-ZJ<os 3 .,a i :=r := =3 "=ili =4?lli,ii Zi z:''=En ;E B t =E;e=EEEEEE,*EEEEEEEE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, September 7, 2021 Subject Consider a Request for Subdivision of Two Parcels into Three Lots and One Outlot and Site Plan Review for Development of an Approximately 82,000­Square Foot, One­Story Office­ Warehouse Building at 2100 Stoughton Avenue (River Valley Industrial Center) Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.2. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2020­19 PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #2021­19 for a preliminary plat and site plan for River Valley Industrial Center, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc, dated August 3, 2021; and Phillip D. Johnson, Architect, dated August 3, 2021, subject to the conditions of staff report, and Adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting subdivision approval to create a building lot for a second building on the site and site plan approval for an 81,660­square foot, one­story office­warehouse building. APPLICANT Capstone Investors, LLC, Joel Buttenhoff, 102 Jonathan Boulevard North, #200, Chaska, MN 55318 SITE INFORMATION PRESENT ZONING:  Industrial Office Park District (IOP) LAND USE:Office Industrial ACREAGE:  24.12 acres  DENSITY:  0.21 F.A.R.  APPLICATION REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XXII, “IOP” Industrial Office Park District PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, September 7, 2021SubjectConsider a Request for Subdivision of Two Parcels into Three Lots and One Outlot and SitePlan Review for Development of an Approximately 82,000­Square Foot, One­Story Office­Warehouse Building at 2100 Stoughton Avenue (River Valley Industrial Center)Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.2.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2020­19PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #2021­19 for a preliminary plat andsite plan for River Valley Industrial Center, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc, dated August3, 2021; and Phillip D. Johnson, Architect, datedAugust 3, 2021, subject to the conditions of staff report, andAdopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThe applicant is requesting subdivision approval to create a building lot for a second building on the site and site planapproval for an 81,660­square foot, one­story office­warehouse building.APPLICANTCapstone Investors, LLC, Joel Buttenhoff, 102 Jonathan Boulevard North, #200, Chaska, MN 55318SITE INFORMATIONPRESENT ZONING:  Industrial Office Park District (IOP)LAND USE:Office IndustrialACREAGE:  24.12 acres DENSITY:  0.21 F.A.R. APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XXII, “IOP” Industrial Office Park District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and  Office­Institutional Developments BACKGROUND River Valley Business Center, an 180,000­square foot, four­unit, office­industrial­warehouse building, is the successor of the M.A. Gedney Pickle processing plant.  The most easterly 39,000­square foot unit contains a storage operation for decommissioned, armored vehicles, which have had their fluids drained.  There are two warehouse storage spaces of 48,370 square feet and 42,602 square feet in the middle portion of the building that are occupied by office, warehouse or manufacturing uses subject to limitations on the sewer capacity with the City of Chaska and Chanhassen City Code.  The westerly 50,160 square feet of the building is vacant and had been approved for a food processing operation, Hemp Acres, which did not proceed. The developer would like to build a second building on the site.  To do so, they must subdivide the property.  Since the public streets adjacent to the development are under the jurisdiction of the City of Chaska and Carver County, right­of­ way dedication and site accesses must comply with their requirements. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Planning Case #2021­19, for a preliminary plat and site plan for River Valley Industrial Center, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc, dated August 3, 2021; and Phillip D. Johnson, Architect, dated August 3, 2021, subject to the conditions of the staff report, and adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact and Recommendation Development Review Application Plans Project Narrative Building Elevations Building Elevations & Materials Carver County Requirements Chaska Boulevard Requirements Traffic Study Affidavit of Mailing CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: September 7, 2021 CC DATE: September 27, 2021 REVIEW DEADLINE: October 5, 2021 CASE #: 2021-19 BY: RG, EH, DN, JR, JS, MU SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Request for subdivision of two parcels into three lots and one outlot and site plan review for development of an approximate 82,000 sq. ft., one-story office- warehouse building, River Valley Industrial Center. The proposed subdivision is in both Chanhassen and Chaska. The proposed building is in Chanhassen. A portion of the parking lot is located within Chaska. The City of Chaska is reviewing the project concurrently and also must grant subdivision approval and site plan approval for the project. LOCATION: 2100 Stoughton Avenue APPLICANT: Capstone Investors, LLC. Joel Buttenhoff 102 Jonathan Boulevard North #200 Chaska, MN 55318 joel@conerstone-mn.com (952) 368-9009 PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #2021-19, for a preliminary plat and site plan for River Valley Industrial Center, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc, dated August 3, 2021; and Phillip D. Johnson, Architect, dated August 3, 2021, subject to the conditions of staff report, And, adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 2 PRESENT ZONING: Industrial Office Park (IOP) 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Office Industrial ACREAGE: 24.12 Acres DENSITY: 0.24 F.A.R. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City’s discretion in approving or denying a Preliminary Plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a Site Plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting subdivision approval to create a building lot for a second building on the site and site plan approval for an 81,660 square foot, one-story office-warehouse building. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XXII, “IOP” Industrial Office Park District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office- Institutional Developments BACKGROUND River Valley Business Center, an 180,000 square foot, four-unit, office-industrial-warehouse building, is the successor of the Gedney Pickle processing plant. The most easterly 39,000- square foot unit contains a storage operation for decommissioned, armored vehicles, which have had their fluids drained. There are two warehouse storage spaces of 48,370 square feet and 42,602 square feet in the middle portion of the building that are occupied by office, warehouse or manufacturing uses subject to limitations on the sewer capacity with the City of Chaska and Chanhassen City Code. The westerly 50,160 square feet of the building is vacant and had been approved for a food processing operation, Hemp Acres, which did not proceed. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 3 October 10, 2010, City Council approved a 39,000 square-foot, one-story warehouse expansion on the east end of the building (Planning Case #2010-11). October 18, 1982, City Council approved Industrial Revenue Bond resolution for M.A. Gedney (Planning File #82-64). November 1979, City Council approved a sign variance to permit two signs on the industrial site. May 1979, City Council approved a 41,500 square-foot warehouse expansion, 6,000 square-foot sauerkraut manufacturing and 1,200 square-foot refrigeration storage (Planning Case P-125 / SPR #71-1). May 1972, Chaska-Chanhassen-Metropolitan Sewer Board entered into an agreement to permit M.A. Gedney to continue to use Chaska’s sanitary sewer system. June 1968, City of Chaska and Village of Chanhassen entered into an agreement to annex to Chanhassen and de-annex from Chaska land being purchased by M.A. Gedney for the plant operations. April 1, 1963, City of Chaska and M.A. Gedney entered into a sewer connection agreement. 1958, M.A. Gedney’s pickle manufacturing operations were consolidated at the plant on Stoughton Avenue. North of the site is vacant land in the City of Chaska and County Road 61 as well as additional vacant land within Chanhassen. To the east is an electrical substation for Minnesota Valley Electric and a cemetery. South across Stoughton Avenue is the Riverview Terrace mobile home park. To the west across Audubon Road are commercial businesses. The western portion of the property contains medal vats from the previous pickle factory on the site. A roofed, open sided dock area has been demolished on the western end of the existing building. In the future, if urban services are available for the entire area, the vacant land on the north side of the building will develop, creating a visual barrier for the north side of the building. The City undertook a feasibility study as part of the County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 61 Corridor Land Use Study in 2015 to determine the cost effectiveness of the extension of utilities to the property, and at that time, determine whether the Cities of Chanhassen or Chaska should provide sewer service to the property. The study findings indicated that extending City utilities to the study area is feasible. The CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study was finalized and approved by City Council on October 28, 2014. In anticipation of the redevelopment of this area, staff has also had discussions with the City of Chaska about extending Engler Boulevard as a connection to the northeast. SITE CONSTRAINTS Bluff Creek Corridor 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 4 This parcel is not encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low-impact practices. Section 20-1255 of the Chanhassen City Code requires a conditional use permit for all development within the Bluff Creek Corridor. Wetland Protection There is/is not a wetland located in the development site. The proposed development should/ should not impact this wetland. Bluff Protection There are/are not bluffs on the property. Shoreland Management The property is not located within a shoreland protection district. Floodplain Overlay This property is/is not within a floodplain. SUBDIVISION ACCESS Access to the property is provided from Audubon Road and Stoughton Avenue, which connect to the arterial roads of CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) and CSAH 15 (Audubon Road). Audubon Road and Stoughton Avenue directly abutting the property are under the City of Chaska’s 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 5 jurisdiction and Flying Cloud Drive is Carver County’s. The City of Chanhassen does not have any right-of-way (ROW) directly abutting the property; however, the approximately 1,300 foot portion of Stoughton Avenue which provides access from Flying Cloud Drive to the property is a part of Chanhassen’s roadway network, illustrated in the image below. A traffic memo prepared by Paul Villaluz, PE, PTOE, RSP1 and Christopher Topacio with Westwood Professional Services, Inc. dated June 30, 2021 was provided by the applicant which addresses the River Valley Industrial Center’s trip generation, trip distribution, trip assignment, total intersection volumes and left turn storage bay analysis on Audubon Road. Also included in the traffic memo is an internal truck movement exhibit which illustrates adequate turning movements within the site for their design vehicle, a WB-67 (semi-truck). Based on the proposed preliminary site layout and the truck movement exhibit, trucks cross lot lines within the subdivision and also will share the existing access located off Stoughton Avenue with the existing building. This will require private cross access agreements between the abutting properties. As the City does not manage ROW directly abutting the site, the applicant will be required to address comments and requirements set forth by the City of Chaska and/or Carver County, which may include ingress/egress configurations, installation of ROW improvements such as sidewalks or traffic control devices, the dedication of ROW, etc. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 6 EASEMENTS The preliminary plat provided by the applicant does not illustrate any public drainage and utility easements (DUE) as required by Sec. 18-76(b) of City Ordinance. The applicant will be required to provide at least a 10-foot wide DUE along all street right-of-way lines and five feet along side and rear lot lines that are located within the City of Chanhassen with the submittal of the final plat. Lots within the City of Chaska will be required to meet Chaska’s requirements. Existing easements were illustrated on the preliminary plat which included electric transmission line easements due to the overhead transmission lines that bisect the proposed subdivision. The applicant must adhere to all comments and recommendations from the utility, Minnesota Valley Electric, regarding improvements within their easements. GRADING & DRAINAGE The site is relatively flat. Existing drainage patterns fall into three subsheds; from the north side of the property sheet flow is directed to the northeast to an existing ditch abutting Chaska Boulevard (EX 1), the southwest portion of the property drains to an existing City of Chaska catch basin at the southwest corner of the site (EX 2), and the central and eastern portions drains to an existing private catch basin at the southeastern corner of the site (EX 3), as seen below. A majority of the grading within the subdivision is proposed on Lot 2 to accommodate the construction of the proposed multi-tenant industrial facility, River Valley Industrial Center, along with the required stormwater management BMPs. The applicant is proposing to construct 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 7 an infiltration basin at the southwest corner of the site to capture stormwater runoff from the roof and parking west and south of the building which is then routed to privately owned catch basins on the south east of the site. A second infiltration basin is located at the northeast corner of the site. The site has existing tanks with an elevated walkway, small abandoned buildings, and a water tower that were once used by a previous tenant of the existing building, the M.A. Gedney food processing plant. The applicant is proposing to remove all of the existing structures located on proposed Lot 2 in order to mass grade the site and construct all improvements. A demolition permit will be required for the removal of all existing structures. The applicant’s preliminary Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Westwood, dated August 3, 2021, indicates that the existing private catch basin to the southeast is owned by the City of Chanhassen, however this is not a City-owned and maintained storm sewer system. The applicant will be required to confirm both the ownership of this private system and determine if the downstream stormwater conveyance and BMPs are adequately sized to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Ultimately, permission to tie-into the private system must be provided prior to the recording of the final plat. Lastly, based on the provided grading plan and narrative it is unclear whether or not the site grading will balance the volume of earthwork necessary to achieve the proposed finished elevations. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. Also, if during the course of grading and/or construction any drain tile is discovered, the developer shall notify the City Engineer and will be required to relocate or abandon the drain tile as directed. EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has provided a preliminary erosion control plan that generally appears feasible, however it is deficient as it does not include all the requirements listed under Sec. 19-145.(a)(2) such as the location of stockpiled materials. Also, no SWPPP was provided which will be required in accordance with the NPDES Construction Permit for review and approval by the City. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. To guarantee compliance with the plans, and related remedial work, a cash escrow or letter of credit, satisfactory to the city, shall be furnished to the city before a Notice to Proceed is issued for the development. The escrow amount shall be 110% of the estimated costs of construction 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 8 for grading, erosion control and stormwater improvements associated with the development. The applicant will be required to supply an engineer’s estimate for the cost of these improvements. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include abstraction of runoff and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). The applicant will need to work with the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD), the City of Chaska, and the City of Chanhassen in order to meet all requirements. General 1. Applicant needs to confirm with the LMRWD map if the project location is in a High Value Resource Area (HVRA). Notes a) and b) below seem to be in conflict regarding the HVRA requirements. a. In the Stormwater Report on page 1, it is stated 1.1” of runoff is required to be retained on site. This is specific to the project being in a HVRA. b. In the Stormwater Report on page 1, it is stated that there should be no net increase in TP and TSS. This is specific to the project NOT being in a HVRA. 2. Provide evidence of an approved LMRWD permit prior to construction. Water Quality 1. Water quality was modeled with P-8 and was shown to be met with reductions of over 90% for TP and TSS. 2. It is recommended to treat water from Proposed Drainage Area 3 (P3) to meet MPCA water quality standards. Confirm no untreated water will enter the wildlife management area adjacent to the project site. Rate Control 1. Rate Control requirements are shown to be met for the 1-, 2-, 10-, and 100-year runoff rates per the HydroCAD modeling results provided. 2. It is recommended to calculate TCs for the proposed drainage areas instead of direct entry in Hydrocad. 3. Edit the Primary Outlet for Pond 2 in Hydrocad to match the slope called out on the drainage plan sheet. Volume Control 1. Infiltration is proposed to meet volume control requirements. Soil borings in the area show sands and silty sands. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 9 Infiltration Basin Design 1. Provide an operation and maintenance plan that identifies the maintenance schedule and responsible party. 2. Applicant should complete a double ring infiltrometer test to confirm soils are conducive to infiltration. If the test yields infiltration rates above 8.3 in/hr, soils should be mixed to reduce infiltration capacity. 3. Applicant should note proposed pretreatment for each infiltration basin. 4. MnDOT recommends at least 200’ separation between infiltration practices and private wells. The new domestic water well on the southwest side of the building is approximately 60’ from the proposed infiltration basin in the southwest corner of the site. 5. MnDOT recommends at least 100’ separation between infiltration practices and septic systems. The septic drain field in the northeast corner of the property is approximately 80’ away from the proposed infiltration swale in the northeast corner of the site. 6. Confirm existing building is not draining to the proposed northeast infiltration swale. Civil Plans 1. It is recommended that that the minimum 12” RCP pipe grade be 0.37%, MnDOT’s minimum grade to meet 3 FPS self-cleaning velocity. Elevations in STMH-201 and STMH-200 will allow for this slope and still connect to existing storm infrastructure. 2. Applicant should ensure there is at least 1.75’ of cover between top of CL V 12” RCP and top of flexible bituminous pavement. Heavy-vehicle traffic will place a substantial load on these pipes. 3. Applicant should confirm with the owner of the private storm sewer (STMH-EX-2) that tying into their existing storm sewer is acceptable for a proposed 10-year storm event. 4. Provide storm sewer sizing calculations for a 10-year storm event. 5. The EOF elevation of the SW basin called out in the grading plan is the same as the dock elevation. It is recommended the EOF be lowered slightly to mitigate flooding risk. 6. Applicant must re-route proposed sanitary sewer around the proposed infiltration basin. 0.5’ between the bottom of the infiltration media and the top of sanitary sewer is not acceptable. 7. Include plan to restore infiltration pond and swale after construction is completed. 8. The project SWPPP and NPDES permit must be submitted to the city prior to the start of any earthwork. WETLANDS AND BUFFERS There are no wetlands located on the property, and as such, no wetland delineation is required. Wetland buffers are not applicable on this parcel. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEES Section 4-30 of City Code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A water quality and water quantity fee are collected with a subdivision. These fees are based on land use 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 10 type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. This fee will be applied to the new lots of record being created. The fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time; 2021 rates are $22,450.00 per acre for Industrial development. 21.28 acres of this development are within Chanhassen. As such, SWMP Fee due at the time of final plat is $477,736.00. UTILITIES Currently, Chanhassen municipal sanitary sewer and water mains do not extend to the southern portion of the City, as such the site does not have adequate public sanitary and water to serve the development’s needs. In 2014, a Highway 61 corridor study was conducted in response to several near and long-term infrastructure projects at the time (e.g. Highway 101 Realignment, CR 61 reconstruction, flood mitigation projects, etc.) which prompted the City to investigate the feasibility of extending City utilities to the southern portion of the City. The study, known as “County Road 61 Corridor Plan”, conducted by SRF in association with Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc., determined that utility extensions were feasible within the study area. The image below, taken from Figure 3.1 of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, depicts the City’s existing and planned sanitary sewer in this area. The proposed development falls within the most southwestern corner of sanitary subdistrict LB-1 (the Lower Bluff Creek District). The 2040 Comprehensive Plan also indicates that water will be extended to the project area, however these utility extensions have yet to be funded. The 2014 study estimated costs and fee revenue associated with extending City utilities to the study area, along with estimated utility assessments per acre, which are shown in Tables 1 and 2. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 11 With a lack of adequate City utilities in the area, the applicant has proposed the construction of a private well and a septic system to serve the utility needs of the River Valley Industrial Center. The applicant is aware that in the future City utilities will be extended and has provided a dry sanitary sewer service which extends to the southern property line to facilitate this future connection. In order to limit the length that public sanitary sewer is required to be extended, the applicant must adjust the termination point of the dry sanitary service line (terminating at proposed MH-5) to the southeast corner of Lot 2. The utility plan provided for the site shows the adjacent building’s water tower supplying fire suppression needs to the newly proposed building. No calculations were provided to show that this is a feasible connection to supply adequate fire flows and the applicant will be required to provide such an analysis. Staff has discussed with the City of Chaska the alignment of this fire line, which at one point extends into Stoughton Avenue. Chaska will not allow for private utility lines within their public right-of-way, thus the fire line must be relocated to meet this requirement. Lastly, as private internal utility lines cross property lines, private operation and maintenance agreements for any internal private utilities crossing property lines must be recorded concurrently with the final plat. The properties associated with this subdivision will be specially assessed for the extension of the public water and sanitary sewer when they connect. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 12 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The applicant for the Holasek Business Park development did not submit tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. Staff estimated as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 21.28 acres Baseline canopy coverage 0% or 0 acre Minimum canopy coverage required 10% or 2 acres or 92,695 sf Total number of trees required 85 trees The applicant has proposed a total of 78 trees to be planted on site, but will need to revise the diversity and quantities of each species as well as bring the total number to be planted up to 85 trees. The planting schedule shall reflect that no one species will comprise more than 8 trees and no genus will have more than 17 trees. PARKS & RECREATION The quality and number of recreational facilities in a community directly contributes to its quality of life. For this reason, the City of Chanhassen places a strong emphasis on parks and open space. As the City of Chanhassen has developed and increased in population, more pressure and attention has been given to providing recreational opportunities for our residents. Increased leisure time, health awareness, greater mobility, and high disposable incomes have all contributed to the increased demand for recreational activities. The challenge of the next century will be to provide facilities for a growing and diverse population. Parks can be defined as public areas that provide active or passive-oriented recreational facilities. A significant characteristic of parkland is its accessibility to its users. Open space is any parcel that is not used for buildings or other structures and is left in a natural state. Parks and open space perform diverse functions such as: meeting physical and psychological needs, enhancing and protecting the resource base, enhancing real estate values, and providing a positive impact on economic development. Parks The goal of neighborhood parks is to provide informal recreational opportunities close to where people live. Chanhassen operates under the standard that all residents should be within walking distance, or a half mile, of a neighborhood park. The proposed subdivision is located in both the Cities of Chanhassen and Chaska. This unique industrial subdivision doesn’t serve your typical resident where neighborhood parks play a vital role. Trails The City’s goal is to maintain a comprehensive and easily navigable trail and sidewalk system that connects neighborhoods to park and recreation facilities, schools, community destinations 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 13 and other communities. This unique subdivision currently lacks a sidewalk/pedestrian corridor and any future road right away or pedestrian access conditions of approval will be deferred to the City of Chaska. The proposed development will have access to regional trails along Chaska Boulevard and the Southwest Regional Trail. Park and Trail Conditions of Approval The current rate for Commercial/Industrial is $12,500 per acre for Park Dedication fees. $12,500 X 7.89 acres = $98,625 Total Park Dedication Fees. The developer shall pay current Commercial/Industrial Park Dedication fees in effect at the time of final plat for Lot 2. PERMITS At this time staff has determined that the developer must contact the following agencies for permits: a) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for the NPDES stormwater permit b) Minnesota Department of Health for the well c) Carver County d) Lower Minnesota River Watershed District e) City of Chanhassen for building permits COMPLIANCE TABLE Area (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Hard Cover % / sq. ft. Notes Code 43,560 150 200 70 / 30,492 Lot 1 583,268 61 / 358,605 13.39 ac. Chanhassen Lot 2 343,688 670 350 63/ 217,800 7.89 ac. Chanhassen Lot 3 49,222 78 686 1.13 Chaska Outlot A 74,487 1.71 ac. Chaska ROW TBD As required by Chaska and Carver County Total 1,050,667 24.12 acres Setbacks: front yards - 30 feet, rear yards - ten feet, side yards - ten fee, site coverage 70% SITE PLAN REVIEW The applicant is requesting site plan approval for an 81,660 square foot, one story office- warehouse building. Development of the building is contingent on approval and recording of the final plat for River Valley Industrial Center. While the building is located within the municipal boundary of the City of Chanhassen, the public streets around the development are located 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 14 within the City of Chaska and subject to compliance with their requirements. Site plan approval is contingent on final plat approval and recording of the plat. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 15 Size Portion Placement The building entrances are recessed into the building and covered by metal canopies. Material and detail High quality materials - accent materials, such as metal or EFIS, may occupy up to 15 percent of the building’s façade. The metal panels would be considered accent material. Acceptable materials incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and other patterning. Color The primary building material facing the streets is a red with black accent exposed aggregate in concrete, light gray horizontal and vertical accent bands, charcoal gray metal accent panels and light gray window framing with smoked windows. Height and Roof Design The building height is 26 feet. City Code requires that each building shall have more than one pitched element. To meet this requirement, the developer has incorporated canopies over building entrances with additional architectural detailing above the entrance. Mechanical equipment shall be screened. No wooded fences on the roof are permitted. The applicant shall demonstrate that the roof mounted HVAC meets this standard. Facade Transparency Fifty percent (50%) of the first floor elevation that is viewed by the public shall include transparent windows and or doors. All other areas shall include landscaping material and architectural detailing and articulation. For buildings with a use or function that does not readily allow windows, e.g., cooler or freezer areas, mechanical rooms, security areas, storage areas or warehouse or manufacturing space in commercial or industrial buildings, the fenestration standards may be reduced. However, the architecture detailing must be provided by the use of upper level windows, the use of spandrel glass or architectural detailing which provides arches, patterning, recesses and shadowing that provide aesthetic interest. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 16 The south elevation of the building requires additional architectural detailing. This elevation should mirror the northern building elevation in materials and accent, rather than simple concrete panels. The truck bay shall be screened from the public right-of-way by the existing building on Lot 1, distance, and additional landscaping along Stoughton Avenue. Site Furnishing The applicant shall install sidewalks from the development to Audubon Road to connect to the sidewalk system in Chaska. Additionally, bike parking facilities and an employee patio area shall be provided. Loading Areas, Refuse Area, Etc. Screening of service yards, refuse and waste removal, other unsightly areas and truck parking/loading areas is required. The applicant shall increase site landscaping along Stoughton Avenue to provide additional screening. The use of berming is encouraged. Location, access and screening detail of trash enclosures must be provided. Lot Frontage and Parking Location The property fronts on three roads, Audubon Road, Chaska Boulevard (County Road 61), and Stoughton Avenue. All of these roadways are located within the city of Chaska. The primary access to the building is off of Audubon Road. Truck access shall be via Stoughton Avenue. Parking is distributed on three sides of the building. Parking setbacks along public rights-of-way may be reduced to a minimum of ten feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that 100 percent screening is provided at least five feet above the adjacent parking lot. ACCESS The development shows access to both Audubon Road and Stoughton Avenue with frontage on Chaska Road. Access permits from the City of Chaska and Carver County are required of the development. The developer shall comply with City of Chaska and Carver County requirements. Staff believes that Chaska is requiring that the access driveway on Audubon Road must align with Crystal Lane, which would require the realignment of the driveway and redesign of the stormwater pond. Chanhassen requires that a pedestrian access be provided from the proposed building to Audubon Road. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 17 EASEMENTS A cross access easement shall be recorded for the parcels in the development. GRADING A majority of the grading within the development is proposed on Lot 2 to accommodate the construction of the proposed multi-tenant industrial facility, River Valley Industrial Center, along with the required stormwater management BMPs. The applicant is proposing to construct an infiltration basin at the southwest corner of the site to capture stormwater runoff from the roof and parking west and south of the building which is then routed to privately owned catch basins on the south east of the site. A second infiltration basin is located at the northeast corner of the site. The site has existing tanks with an elevated walkway, small abandoned buildings, and a water tower that were once used by a previous tenant of the existing building, the Gedney food processing plant. The applicant is proposing to remove all of the existing structures located on proposed Lot 2 in order to mass grade the site and construct all improvements. A demolition permit will be required for the removal of all existing structures. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 18 The applicant’s preliminary Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Westwood, dated August 3, 2021, indicates that the existing private catch basin to the southeast is owned by the City of Chanhassen, however this is not a City-owned and maintained storm sewer system. The applicant will be required to confirm both the ownership of this private system and determine if the downstream stormwater conveyance and BMPs are adequately sized to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Ultimately, permission to tie-into the private system must be provided prior to the recording of the final plat. Lastly, based on the provided grading plan and narrative it is unclear whether or not the site grading will balance the volume of earthwork necessary to achieve the proposed finished elevations. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. Also, if during the course of grading and/or construction any drain tile is discovered, the developer shall notify the City Engineer and will be required to relocate or abandon the drain tile as directed. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has provided a preliminary erosion control plan that generally appears feasible, however it is deficient as it does not include all the requirements listed under Sec. 19-145.(a)(2) such as the location of stockpiled materials. Also, no SWPPP was provided which will be required in accordance with the NPDES Construction Permit for review and approval by the City. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. To guarantee compliance with the plans, and related remedial work, a cash escrow or letter of credit, satisfactory to the city, shall be furnished to the city before a Notice to Proceed is issued for the development. The escrow amount shall be 110% of the estimated costs of construction for grading, erosion control and stormwater improvements associated with the development. The applicant will be required to supply an engineer’s estimate for the cost of these improvements. The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 19 LANDSCAPING The development is required to install a buffer yard along the north, south and west property lines. The minimum requirements are shown in the table below: Required plantings Proposed plantings Bufferyard C – North prop. line, Lyman Blvd., 660’ 13 overstory trees 33 understory trees 33 shrubs 13 overstory trees 5 understory trees 37 shrubs Bufferyard C – South prop. line, Stoughton Ave., 520’ 15 overstory trees (not recommended under power lines) 31 (46 total) understory trees 46 shrubs 4 overstory trees 7 understory trees 33 shrubs Bufferyard C –west prop. line, Audubon Rd., 760’ 15 overstory trees 38 understory trees 38 shrubs 19 overstory trees 3 understory trees 16 shrubs The applicant does not meet bufferyard requirements along any of the property lines. Staff recommends that the applicant increase landscaping quantities to meet minimum requirements. The applicant will need to provide adequate screening of the loading docks along the south property line and parking stalls along the north property line. There are overhead power lines along Stoughton Avenue, therefore the overstory tree quantities should be added to the understory total and species such as spruce should be changed to junipers or cedars. Additionally, buffer plantings need to be located north of the parking area along Chaska Boulevard. All parking areas are required to have screening. Minimum requirements for landscaping for the parking lot include 6,400 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, five landscape islands or peninsulas, and 25 trees for the parking lot. The applicant’s proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 6,400 sq. ft. >6,400 sq. ft. Trees/parking lot 25 trees 18 trees Landscape islands or peninsulas/parking lot 5 islands/peninsulas 5 islands/peninsulas The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for trees. The applicant shall increase the parking lot tree planting quantity to 25 trees. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 20 LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The applicant has submitted a lighting plan and photometrics for review. Light fixtures include area lighting on 25-foot tall poles as well as wall mounted units. Lighting shall be revised at the southeast corner of the building to reduce lighting at the property line to 0.5. The applicant shows a monument sign at the corner of Audubon Road and Chaska Boulevard. This sign must comply with Chaska Code and receive a permit from them. If monument signage is proposed in Chanhassen, it would be limited to 64 square feet of sign display area and eight feet in height. Wall signage must comply with City of Chanhassen signage requirements. All signage requires separate sign permits. The City anticipates individual tenant signage as part of the development. MISCELLANEOUS Building will require a full fire suppression system, fire alarm panel to monitor the sprinkler system, and possibly a full functioning fire alarm system based on type of occupancy (planned type of storage in building). How the water will be supplied for the fire suppression system and fire hydrants must be analyzed and submitted for City review and approval. The system will need to meet NFPA13 standards to supply both buildings and fire hydrants on site with the proper flow as needed. The fire line could not run under the city street (per City of Chaska) so they need to find a different path. • Calculations for the new building for ESFR heads with a fire pump system and all 4 hydrants proposed to be added. The calculations will show the demand for all of this and how to provide adequate supply. A septic design must be submitted and approved before a building permit can be issued. Septic design must be prepared by a septic design professional licensed by the State of Minnesota. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the Code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to; allowable size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. Building plans must include a Code analysis that contains the following information: Key plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext walls, Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 21 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include abstraction of runoff and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). UTILITIES Sanitary sewer service shall be provided via a private septic system. In the future, City sewer may be extended to the property. At that time, the development would be required to connect to the City sewer. Section 19-41 requires that buildings connect to City sewer. All buildings and structures constructed within the city after March 11, 1985, on premises adjacent to a sewer of the City sanitary sewer system, or in a block through or to which the sanitary sewer system extends, or is within 150 feet of said sanitary sewer system, shall be connected to the city sanitary sewer system for the disposal of sewage or industrial waste. Water is proposed via a new domestic well for the building. Water supply for the fire suppression system is from the existing water tank on Lot 1. Size and direction of proposed water lines, fire hydrants, distance of hydrant to proposed building and the capacity of the water supply for fire suppression purposes shall be analyzed, reviewed and approved by the City. COMPLIANCE TABLE Code Project Building Height 4 stories 1 story 50 feet 26 feet Building Setback N - 10' E - 10' N - 10' E - 114' W - 30' S - 30' W - 101' S – 59’ Parking Stalls 101 stalls 111 stalls (Standards: Office: 5/1.000 square feet (12,249/1,000 x 5 = 61.25) Warehouse 1/1,000 for 1st 10,000 then1/2,000 thereafter (69,411 square feet 10,000/1,000 + 59,411/2,000 = 39.71) Parking Setback N - 0' E - 0' N - 0' E - 0' W - 30' S - 25' W - 27' S – 26’ Hard Surface Coverage 70% 63% Lot Area 43,560 sq. ft. 343,688 sq. ft. (7.89 ac.) 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 22 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Planning Case #2021- 19, for a preliminary plat and site plan for River Valley Industrial Center, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc, dated August 3, 2021; and Phillip D. Johnson, Architect, dated August 3, 2021, and adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: PRELIMINARY PLAT Engineering 1. A private cross access agreements between Lots 1 and 2 must be recorded concurrently with the final plat. 2. Private operation and maintenance agreements for any internal private utilities crossing property lines must be recorded concurrently with the final plat. 3. The applicant shall address all requirements set forth by the City of Chaska and Carver County prior to recording of the final plat and/or issuance of a Notice to Proceed for construction activities. 4. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, as necessary, i.e. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, Carver County, the City of Chaska, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers, etc. and comply with their conditions of approval. 5. The applicant shall provide drainage and utility easements in accordance with Sec. 18- 76(b) with the submittal of the final plat. 6. The applicant shall confirm the ownership of all private storm systems proposed to be connected to. Permission to tie into the private system must be provided prior to the recording of the final plat. 7. The Stormwater Management Report and modeling shall be updated to include analysis of downstream private conveyance and stormwater BMPs that are being proposed to be connected to in order to ensure they will adequately function with the increase in stormwater volumes. 8. An updated erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with Sec. 19-145 and SWPPP in accordance with the NPDES Construction Permit shall be provided for review and approval prior to commencement of any construction activities. 9. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. 10. Fire flow calculations justifying the existing water tank can supply the newly proposed development’s fire suppression needs shall be provided for review prior to recording of the final plat. 11. The private fire line proposed under Stoughton Avenue shall be relocated wholly outside the right-of-way. 12. The properties associated with this subdivision will be specially assessed for the extension of the public water and sanitary sewer when they connect. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 23 Parks 1. The developer shall pay Commercial/Industrial Park Dedication fees in effect at the time of final plat for Lot 2. Environmental Resources 1. Diversity within the Planting Schedule shall meet minimum standards for 85 trees to meet subdivision planting requirements. Water Resources 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate SWMP Fee for the rate in effect at the time of recording the final plat. 2021 rates would require a fee of $477,736.00. 2. The applicant shall confirm with the LMRWD map if the project location is in a High Value Resource Area (HVRA). 3. The applicant shall provide the approved LMRWD permit when it is obtained. 4. The applicant shall work with the City to execute an Operations and Maintenance Plan that identifies the maintenance schedule and responsible parties for the infiltration basin. 5. The applicant shall complete a double ring infiltrometer test to confirm soils are conducive to infiltration. 6. The applicant shall confirm with the City of Chaska that tying into the private storm sewer, but within Chaska’s right-of-way, is permissible. 7. The project SWPPP and NPDES permit must be submitted to the City prior to the start of any earthwork. SITE PLAN Building 1. A septic design must be submitted and approved before a building permit can be issued. 2. Septic design must be prepared by a septic design professional licensed by the State of Minnesota. 3. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 4. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 5. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 6. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 7. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the Code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to; allowable size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. 8. Building plans must include a code analysis that contains the following information: Key plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext walls, Bearing walls - exterior or 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 24 interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. 9. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Engineering 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of site plan approval. This shall include, but is not limited to, 110% of the estimated costs of construction for grading, erosion control and stormwater improvements associated with the development. 2. The applicant shall address all requirements set forth by the City of Chaska and/or Carver County prior to construction activities. 3. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, as necessary, i.e. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, Carver County, the City of Chaska, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Health, Army Corps of Engineers, etc. and comply with their conditions of approval. 4. The applicant shall address all requirements set forth by Minnesota Valley Electric regarding any improvements within the utility’s easements. 5. A demolition permit will be required for the removal of all existing structures. 6. The applicant shall supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff for materials imported to or exported from the site prior to construction activities. 7. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during construction and shall relocate or abandon the drain tile as directed by the City Engineer. 8. An updated erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with Sec. 19-145 and SWPPP in accordance with the NPDES Construction Permit shall be provided for review and approval prior to commencement of any construction activities. 9. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. 10. The applicant must adjust the termination point of the dry sanitary service line (terminating at proposed MH-5) to the southeast corner of Lot 2. 11. Fire flow calculations justifying the existing water tank can supply the newly proposed development’s fire suppression needs shall be provided for review. Fire 1. Building will require a full fire suppression system, fire alarm panel to monitor the sprinkler system, and possibly a full functioning fire alarm system based on type of occupancy (planned type of storage in building). Fire flow calculations for the new building for ESFR heads with a fire pump system and all four hydrants proposed to be added. The calculations will show the demand for all of this and how to provide adequate supply. 2. How the water will be supplied for the fire suppression system and fire hydrants must be analyzed and submitted for City review and approval. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 25 3. Access roads and parking lot will need to be of proper type and size to meet Fire Apparatus Access Roads standards. Environmental Resources 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to increase quantities to meet minimum ordinance requirements for bufferyard plantings. 2. The applicant shall increase the number of trees around the parking lots areas to 25 trees. 3. The applicant shall plant only understory species and shrubs along Stoughton Avenue. Planning 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee site restoration and landscaping. 2. Site plan approval is contingent on final plat approval and recording of the plat. 3. The south elevation of the building requires additional architectural detailing. 4. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the proposed building to Audubon Road. 5. Bike parking facilities and an employee patio area shall be provided. 6. Location, access and screening detail of trash enclosures must be provided. Water Resources 1. The applicant shall provide the approved LMRWD permit when it is obtained. 2. The applicant shall treat water from Proposed Drainage Area 3 (P3) to meet MPCA water quality standards. 3. The applicant shall confirm that no untreated water will enter the wildlife management area adjacent to the project site. 4. The applicant shall calculate TCs for the proposed drainage areas instead of direct entry into Hydrocad. 5. The applicant shall edit the Primary Outlet for Pond 2 in hydrocad to match the slope called out on the drainage plan sheet. 6. The applicant shall work with the City to execute an Operations and Maintenance Plan that identifies the maintenance schedule and responsible parties for the infiltration basin. 7. The applicant shall complete a double ring infiltrometer test to confirm soils are conducive to infiltration. 8. The applicant shall note the proposed pretreatment for each infiltration basin. 9. The applicant shall adjust the plans to meet MnDOT’s recommended 200-feet of separation between the infiltration basin and the domestic water well. 10. The applicant shall adjust the plans to meet MnDOT’s recommended 100-feet of separation between the infiltration basin and the septic system. 11. The applicant shall confirm that the existing building is not draining to the proposed northeast infiltration swale. 12. The applicant shall adjust the 12” RCP pipe grade to be 0.37%, MNDOT’s minimum grade to meet 3 FPS self-cleaning velocity. 13. The applicant shall ensure there is at least 1.75’ of cover between top of CL V 12” RCP and top of flexible bituminous pavement. 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 26 14. The applicant shall confirm with the owner of the private storm sewer (STMH-EX-2) that tying into their existing storm sewer is acceptable for a proposed 10-year storm. 15. The applicant shall confirm with the City of Chaska that tying into the private storm sewer, but within Chaska’s right-of-way, is permissible. 16. The applicant shall provide storm sewer sizing calculations for a 10-year storm event. 17. The applicant shall lower the EOF elevation to mitigate flooding risk. 18. The applicant shall re-route proposed sanitary sewer around the proposed infiltration basin. 0.5’ between the bottom of the infiltration media and the top of sanitary sewer is not acceptable. 19. The applicant shall include a plan to restore the infiltration pond and swale after construction is completed. 20. The project SWPPP and NPDES permit must be submitted to the City prior to the start of any earthwork. 21. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Plans 4. Architectural Specifications 5. Carver County Letter 6. Chaska Boulevard Requirements 7. Traffic Study 8. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-19 2100 stoughton ave (river valley industrial ctr)\staff report pc river valley ind ctr_final.docx 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Capstone Investors, LLC for Subdivision approval and Site Plan Review. On September 7, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly schedule meeting to consider the application of Capstone Investors, LLC for Subdivision approval and Site Plan Review for the property located at 2100 Stoughton Avenue. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Industrial Office Park District, IOP. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: See Exhibit A 4. Subdivision Findings a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and meets all of the requirements of the “IOP” Industrial Office Park District; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable City, County and regional plans including but not limited to the City's Comprehensive Plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to compliance with the conditions of approval; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements; 2 g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. Site Plan Findings Section 20-110: (1) Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Is consistent with Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6; (3) Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; (4) Creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 3 6. The planning report #2021-19 dated September 7, 2021, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat and site plan review subject to the conditions of the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 7th day of September, 2021. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY:___________________________________ Its Chairman 4 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 115, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West line of said Section 3 distant 1795.7 feet due South of the Northwest corner thereof, said point being in the Southeasterly right of way line of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad; thence running Northeasterly along said right of way line 997.8 feet; thence running due South parallel with the West line of said Section 3, 272.18 feet to a point in the centerline of the industry spur track, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, said point also being in a curve having a radius of 694.69 feet, the radius point of said curve being South 46 degrees 57 minutes East, 694.69 feet from said actual point of beginning; thence running Northeasterly along the centerline of said industry spur track and along the arc of said curve to the right a distance of 89.72 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 50 degrees 27 minutes East tangent to said curve and along the centerline of said industry spur track 1270.56 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 599.39 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the left and along the centerline of said industry spur track, a distance of 307.21 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 21 degrees 05 minutes East tangent to said curve and along the centerline of said industry spur track, 151.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 532.18 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the right and along the centerline of said industry spur track 142.42 feet to its intersection with the Southeasterly right of way line of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad, said point being 48.93 feet Southwesterly from the North line of said Section 3 as measured along said Southeasterly right of way line; thence running Northeasterly along said Southeasterly right of way line 48.93 feet to a point in the North line of said Section 3; thence running East along said North line 146.4 feet, more or less to the Northwest corner of the parcel of land conveyed to St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church as recorded in Book 46 Deeds, Page 19, filed August 23, 1950; thence running South at right angles 593.85 feet; thence deflecting 53 degrees 47 minutes to the right and running Southwesterly parallel with the Northerly right of way line of the Chaska and Shakopee Road, 150 feet; thence deflecting 53 degrees 47 minutes to the left and running Southerly 175 feet to a point in the Northerly right of way line of the Chaska and Shakopee Road; thence running Southwesterly along said Northerly right of way line 1676.9 feet, more or less, to a point in a line drawn parallel with the West line of said Section 3 from the actual point of beginning; thence running North along said parallel line 367.62 feet, more or less, to the actual point of beginning. For the purpose of this description the West line of Section 3, Township 115, Range 23 is considered to be a due North and South line. Except that part lying West of the following described Line A: Commencing at a point on the West line of said Northwest Quarter distant 1655.37 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner thereof, said West line has an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds West, said point being on the Northerly line of the Chicago and North Western Railroad Company right of way; thence North 51 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds East along said right of way line 1218.17 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line A to be described; thence South 23 degrees 43 minutes 37 seconds East 8.72 feet; thence Southerly 228.75 feet along a tangential curve 5 concave to the West having a radius of 510.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds; thence North 88 degrees 01 minutes 42 seconds West and not tangent to said curve 5.00 feet; thence Southerly 96.91 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 505.00 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds and a chord bearing of South 07 degrees 28 minutes 09 seconds West; thence South 12 degrees 57 minutes 59 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 143.07 feet; thence Southerly 330.26 feet along a tangential curve concave to the East having a radius of 420.00 and a central angle of 45 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds, and there terminating. AND Excepting therefrom the following described tract: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 115 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 3; thence on an assumed bearing of South 88 degrees 52 minutes 27 seconds East along the north line of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 2286.69 feet; thence South 01 degree 21 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 195.90 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 412.15 feet; thence South 34 degrees 48 minutes 12 seconds East to the intersection with the westerly line of the parcel conveyed to Northern States Power Company by the document recorded in Book 61 of Deeds, page 58, in the office of the Carver County Recorder; thence northerly along said westerly line to the northwesterly line of said conveyed parcel; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line to the intersection with the westerly line of the parcel conveyed to St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church by the document recorded in Book 46 of Deeds, page 19, in the office of the Carver County Recorder; thence northerly along said west line to the intersection with a line bearing North 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence South 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds West to the point of beginning. (Abstract Property) Parcel 2: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West line of said Section 3 distant 1795.7 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof, said point being in the Southeasterly right-of-way line of the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Company; thence running Northeasterly along said right-of-way line 997.8 feet to a point (which point is the Northwest corner of the tract previously conveyed to American Sugar Company as described in Book 44 of Deeds at Page 8 thereof), which point is the true point of beginning of the tract conveyed; thence running South parallel with the West line of said Section 3, 272.18 feet to a point (which point is the Northwest corner of the tract previously conveyed to M. A. Gedney Company as described in Book 61 of Deeds at Page 251 thereof) in a curve having a radius of 694.69 feet, the radius point of said curve being South 46 degrees 57 minutes East 694.69 feet from said point; thence running Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of the tract previously conveyed to M. A. Gedney Company as described in Book 61 of Deeds at Page 251 thereof and along the arc 6 of said curve to the right a distance of 89.72 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 50 degrees 27 minutes East tangent to said curve 1270.56 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 599.39 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the left a distance of 307.21 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 21 degrees 05 minutes East tangent to said curve 151.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 532.18 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the right 142.42 feet to its intersection with the Southeasterly right-of-way line of Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company railroad, said point being 48.93 feet Southwesterly from the North line of said Section 3 as measured along said Southeasterly right-of-way line; thence running Southwesterly along said Southeasterly right-of- way line of Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company railroad to the point of beginning. Except that part lying West of the following described Line A: Commencing at a point on the West line of said Northwest Quarter distant 1655.37 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner thereof, said West line has an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds West, said point being on the Northerly line of the Chicago and North Western Railroad Company right of way; thence North 51 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds East along said right of way line 1218.17 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line A to be described; thence South 23 degrees 43 minutes 37 seconds East 8.72 feet; thence Southerly 228.75 feet along a tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 510.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds; thence North 88 degrees 01 minutes 42 seconds West and not tangent to said curve 5.00 feet; thence Southerly 96.91 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 505.00 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds and a chord bearing of South 07 degrees 28 minutes 09 seconds West; thence South 12 degrees 57 minutes 59 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 143.07 feet; thence Southerly 330.2 feet along a tangential curve concave to the East having a radius of 420.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds, and there terminating. (Abstract Property) g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-19 2100 stoughton ave (river valley industrial ctr)\findings of fact river valley industrial center_final.docx COMMUilTTY OEVELOPilIEI{T OEPARTTTENT Phnning Division - 7700 Markct Boulevard Mailrng AddI3Bs - P O 8ox 147. Chanhass€n. MN 55317 P hon.: (952) 227-1 1 0 0 t F ex. 1952i, 227 .1 1 10 APPLICA FOR Srrbmrli.l oat J] *crTYorcltAtlttAssrlt DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ..o",fl-EfJ-!l- so.oryRceow *" tol( [ >tv Secllon 1: Apphcalpn Type (check all that apply) lfur. b iL w99tle aaacer, dEd.frr 'b. rrcrrrld t.rtdll!/ E Comprchcnsrvc Phn Ancndmcnt .... ... .. t6OO 3E Minor MUSI lin. for irrling on-!it! sav.rs tlOO E Cmditional Ur. Pcrmit (CUP) ! Srnglr-Family R6d.ncr ... $325fl All Oh!r'.... .. .. .. . . t425 E tntcrim Usc Permit (tUP) el ln coojunslbn wirh Srngb-Fsnily R6rdcnc. . t325 LI All Ohcr!... . t425 t1lofln.,,r'i th', ttlug Go ry hE ryk iot1) Subdivi.ion lSl.JB) l,Bl creato 3 tots or lesr a lr cl l i ! Creatc ov.r 3lorr . S600 { lob) -l M6tqJ & Bound! (2 ror3) .. .. . . .. .. . + S'15 par lot $300o D Rgzoning (REZ) lhml4fi fi' da'loqn"{ conl, d' ! Ptanned Unlt Oevelopment (PUO) . . . .. . t750 E Vacelix of Ea$rnsnt Rrght of-wly (VAC)... ..t300 E Mino, Amefidront to axBting PUD.. ......3100 (AddnDnrr rlcodirt 1... mrv splv) E Ait otrea .. .. . . ... ... .. . . . s500 Etr va.ianc" (vAR). .?I,*l^!.(,- ..1:!.1.r:.... . ., ., ,..$2jq- signpranRoviax . .. .... .. . $iso i w*,"noer"r",,#E!,*ynffi1"'*,u ""'" ' Srte Plan Rev6^, (SPR) E Singte-F.mily Rrrrdcncr. . . .. . .' ."' . .. 3150 ! Mministrativr. .. . . . .. S1OO lJ All Others $275 F 3ilTfi81'lt#t'3J,?iJl*'ro,r,*..11* El zoninsAppcar .. . .. . . .s1oo ( 9?.f tho'/s.nd lquaG fc.l) 5nor CiO:111 OE Zonrng Ordrnanc. Am.ndmant (ZOA) SSOO'lrdud! n nb.r oltllll8g..n lorcc6 - i{-- -- - - - .tndl(la lrmbt o, @ amrtoyaaa:o Sng;*"*:ffi;- ' - -- s5oo tr;,.ffiJ:iijrEH?X"'[,1ffi#ffi:* E Notification Sign {cny ro,^x.fl.nd rclnol,r) ... -.. .. -. i., .t .t200 $ Property ownea' Lilt within 5oo' (cr., ro gener.r.6le. p'r-.ppr""ri*,,,*t ngt...fJ'^ ng i11L1 'n, L]i5i". *0.* Leddr$8e8)E Escrow for Recording Oocuments (ch€ck allthat apply) ....... .$50 p.r docum€nt E Conditional Ws Pemit I tntcrim u3e P€rmit E Sita P]ro AgBsmsnt E Vacation E Variancc E w6tland Alteration Psrmil E Maes & Sounds SuMivBion (3 docs.) E Eascm.nts (- eascments) tr Dscd! TOTAL FEE: Consolidate Lots . .. . .. .. . 8150 Lot Linr Adtustmcnl. ........... $150 F,nat ptat.... (?,r(,r& t.,t)ta\t!.w) $ioo (lnc uda3 t450 6crow for attomay co6ts)' 'Addtronal claro* m!y be raqurl.d for oltar agplicanons tr D d S€ction 2: Required lntormation Oescriptron of proposal ,VDgrvtrtoNl .f 6\r{f\P t ft>cCc 171. lrtt L4r I tfiYlvl,," t€qevJ F\y Ottltvc\aetl .f 0tlL t.'9"'1^'t.L rvrV1,rta 7 tr'r, Total Acreage Pr$ent Zoning xl Wetlands Present?f ves fi trto Rcqu*ted Zonrngf e z tD r o??tct .|Jo Re quested Land Us€ DesrgnationPresent Land Use O*€nation 0F(t Lt tPD- Exrsting Use of Propsny ?rtlttL f r..Dv, j:oL!: yglN f t li!:1 crTY OFECHANIIASSEN AUG 0 6 2021 $tAlstASS$ n AMlltlG DwI lcrrect< box if separate narBtive is attached Propcrly Address or L ocation Parcet t -?5!9)97!9- LegatoffJcnptio: ,er 5w P'tc\ / frtvt^Pbt1 y''ff Seclion 3: Property Owner and Applicant lnrornEtion M/k APPLICANT OTHER TI{AN PROPERW OWNER: ln ligning thiE epplication, l. ac applic.nt, r.pres€nt to nave obrerned authorrzelon from thc property owner to fila this applicslion I agre€ to bs bound by cond[ron! ot approval, subjcct only to the oght lo oblact at lha haanngs on th! applrcatroo or during the appesl penod. ll thia applcalion hlr not baan 3ignld oy tha prop.rty ovi/n€r. I havc atiached 3sp.rale docu,nenteton of tull l€981 cspacrty to filc lhr applicatlon Thl3 apptrcation should bc proc4$ed in my name end I am tha pady whom th. City 3hould cont*t rcgardlng any mattar po.taining to thr! spplicittion. I will h€ap myserl rnform€d of tha dcadline! for tubmirlron ot meteriel and tha p.ogra$ ol thB Eppticetion. I fu(her understBnd that addiuonsl fees may be charged tor consuning facs, foasibility studbs. 6tc. with an e3trmat pnor to any authorization to proc€ad ryith thc study I crrtify lhat thr ntormation and gxhibrts submalted are true and corrscl Address Contact Phone: City/Stde/Zip Email: Cell Fax Date PROPERTY OW[{ER: ln signing this application, l, as properly owner, have lull eget c.pscity to .nd hE lby do. authorize thc filino ot this applicetion. I undeBtand that conditions of approval arc bindlng and agre. to bc bound by thos€ cond(roflS, 3ubrscl only lo the right to object at the hearings or dunng the appeal peflods I wi I ksep my$f rnformed of tha dcodlirc! tor |ubmisEron of mderial and the progress of lhis applcetLcn. I lunhar understand that addilEnal foa3 may be chargrd tor consuttrng fe€s, leasibilily stud e3 etc. with an $limats prior to 6ny authorizAion to proce€d with lhr sludy. I ccrlify that the information and exhibits submined are true snd corr6ct. X Narnc Add.esE Cityi Siate/Zip Contact Phon€. Csll. Fax: Dalo g c Err arl Srgnatu PROJECT ENGINEER (if applrcablc) Naffo: bl€sf wo.o ?lt if+s,c.tv I € t',t re j Addte33 Contast Phone D rt,tgv et A. r 1EL.1oc.1 415 b:1,1t0, 141>. L-)./Lae-r-r This appti:af$n must Ue complctod in t[[ and must bc accompanEd by all anformation and plam required by applrc.bla City Ordinence provisions. Eefor8 filing this applicaton. refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confor with ths Plaflnrng Oeparlmaot to dctrfmin€ the spccific ordinance and applicable procedural requirBmenB and f€€g A determinatbn of completeness ol the application shall bo made withrn 15 business days ol application submittal. A writtcn noticc of applicatron deficienclcs shall be mailed to the applicant withrn 15 busine$ days of application. Who should receive copies of staff reports? Property Owner Vra: El Email 'Other Contact lnlormatlon: Etrlrj - Ema I Email Emarl Appli=nt Engneer Olher' trtrtr Marted Paper Copy Marl6d Paper Copy Mailed Paper Copy Aodress tr El Mailad Papsr copy City/Statezip: Email. !$iIS!19!!LI9jEE!EAXI: Complete allnecessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to savo a copy to your devic" PRINT FORM and d.laver to city along with required documonts and payment SUBMIT FORM to s€nd a digital copy to the c y for proce3srng PRLNT TORM SUBUIT FORU Name Srgnaturc Crty/Statdzip: nll,.c tp,tv,, f1) 5t| 4n CaL Emar, dan. lt L'. F wtst vJool ?t,t,^a Fu.. Section 4: Notficalion lntormation No-o - POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHFFE=759.46FFE=760.00SSTEEEESPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHTRANSMISSIONLINE TOWERBUILDINGELECTRICCABINETTRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENTPER DOC NO. A455245AUDUBON ROAD CHASKA BLVD. (COUNTY ROAD 61)STOUGHTON AVENUEAREA NOT FULLY SURVEYED125. 0 0 SSSSSTROCK LANDSCAPINGGUARD RAILWEMAILTCRYSTAL LANEC-STORERIGHT-INEXISTING BITUMINOUSEXISTING178,753 SF81,660 SF BUILDINGFFE = 762.50DOCK ELEV = 758.5078959109810861011NO PARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGINFILTRATION PONDBOTTOM ELV = 754.00OUTLET ELEV = 756.50100-YR HWL = 756.68INFILTRATION SWALEBOTTOM ELV = 754.00OUTLET ELEV = 756.50BUILDING 181,660 SF BUILDINGFFE = 762.50DOCK ELEV = 758.5078959109810861011NO PARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGINFILTRATION PONDBOTTOM ELV = 754.00OUTLET ELEV = 756.50100-YR HWL = 756.68INFILTRATION SWALEBOTTOM ELV = 754.00OUTLET ELEV = 756.50BUILDING 1LOT 2 (CHANHASSEN)LOT 1 (CHANHASSEN)CITY OF CHASKA111111S.1S.1S.2S.2S.21515151321AACDDEFEFGHLOT 3 (CHASKA)FFJ73.35'6'18'26'50'26'25'30'25'30'10'25'30'10'1 8 ' 2 6 ' R25'R25'888R60'18'26'18'28.24' 18'26'26'14026.55'6R30' R3 0 ' R5'R10'R10'32212121212124242410101010KMLR50'R5'R22'R5'R30'R5'R5'R15'R10 'R20'R10'R46'R20'R46 ' R10'R10'58.63'111113OUTLOT A(CHASKA)NNNNNPPPPPOOOOQS.21572.82' 10.00'100.92'30.15'30.06'SANITARY DRAIN FIELDSANITARY DRAIN FIELD(RESERVE LOCATION)IIIIIII131313114.07'26.20' 26.00'63.36'83.92'SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:HORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0031776.00\DWG\CIVIL\0031776SP01.DWG CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA08/12/2021...RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTERCIVIL SITE PLAN102 JONATHAN BLVD N #200CHASKA, MN 55318RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTERC20008/03/20211891908/12/2021DANIEL M. PARKSCAPSTONE INVESTORS, LLCNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION© 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'40'80'120'1" = 40'40'8' or 4'1208/03/202108/12/2021...CITY SUBMITTALCITY OF CHANHASSEN COMMENTS...PROJECT NUMBER: 0031776.00S.1S.10S.2REFERENCESTOP SIGN30" X 30"R1-1SIZEMnDOT DESIGNATIONHANDICAP ACCESSIBLE12" X 18"R7-8M1 B612 CURB AND GUTTER6CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER8PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK10PRIVATE PARALLEL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP11STOP BAR13TRAFFIC ARROW15HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING21HEAVY DUTY LOADING DOCK (AT 4' BELOW FFE)24CONCRETE CURB AT SIDEWALK32CURB CUT WITH RIP RAP40RETAINING WALL (SEE ARCH PLANS)1·EXISTING ZONING:IOP - INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT·PROPOSED ZONING:IOP - INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT·PARCEL DESCRIPTION:SEE SURVEY FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION·TOTAL PROPERTY AREA: 24.12 ACRES (1,050,667 SF)NEW BUILDING: LOT 2 (CHANHASSEN)7.89 ACRES (343,688 SF)NEW BUILDING: LOT 3 (CHASKA)1.13 ACRES (49,223 SF)EX. BUILDING: LOT 1 (CHANHASSEN) 13.39 ACRES (583,268 SF)EX. BUILDING: OUTLOT A (CHASKA)1.71 ACRES (74,488 SF)·EXISTING BUILDING GROSS SIZE178,753 SF·BUILDING COVERAGE (% OF SITE)NEW LOT, BUILDING 1 COVERAGE:20.78%EX. LOT, EX. BUILDING COVERAGE:27.18%BUILDING 1 INFORMATION·PERVIOUS SURFACE:4.02 ACRES (45%)·IMPERVIOUS SURFACE(RATIO):5.00 ACRES (55%)·EXPECTED OCCUPANCY55·BUILDING 1 HEIGHT26' - ONE STORY·BUILDING 1 GROSS SIZE:81,660 SFOFFICE (EST. 15%): 12,660 SFWAREHOUSE/COMMON (EST. 85%):69,000 SF·BUILDING SETBACK PER CODE:30'=FRONT10'=SIDE10'=REAR·PARKING SETBACK:10'=FRONT AND ROW (CHASKA)5'=SIDE AND REAR (CHASKA)25'=FRONT, SIDE, AND REAR (CHANHASSEN)·PARKING SPACE/DRIVE AISLE:9' WIDE X 18' LONG, 26' AISLE·PARKING COVERAGE (% OF SITE)BUILDING 1 PARKING AND LOADING AREA2.14 ACRES (23.72%)·PARKING RATIO REQUIREMENTCITY OF CHANHASSENOFFICE5 SPACE / 1000 SF OF OFFICE SPACEWAREHOUSE:1 SPACE / 1000 SF UP TO 10,000 SF PLUS1 SPACE / 2000 SF OVER 10,000 SFOFFICE (12,660 X 5/1000)64 SPACESWAREHOUSE (10,000 / 1000 + 59,000 / 2000)40 SPACESTOTAL SPACES REQUIRED:104 SPACES·PARKING PROVIDED:110SIGN LEGENDSITE DETAILS (SI-0XX)SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY1.BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONALSERVICES, MINNETONKA, MN, 04/06/2021.2.LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THEENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY.3.REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS.4.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OFEXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS.6.ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7.ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERSAND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OFTHESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS.9.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THERECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURINGCONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TOADJACENT PROPERTIES.11.SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPAREDBY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS.GENERAL SITE NOTESPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLCONCRETE PAVEMENTNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSTRANSFORMERSITE LIGHTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDFENCEXXHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSTANDARD DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTRAFFIC SIGNPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGEND5TA PROPOSED TURN LANE STRIPPINGBNOT USEDCSEPTIC DRAIN FIELDDPROPOSED LOT LINEEBUILDING SETBACK LINEFPARKING SETBACK LINEGFULL ACCESS AUTO ONLY ENTRANCEHTRUCK ENTRANCEILANDSCAPED AREAJPROJECT IDENTIFICATION SIGNKSEPTIC TANKSLVERIFY NEW PAVEMENT LINE WITH OWNERMSAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENTNBITUMINOUS LOADING DOCK (AT FFE)OSTANDARD DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTQDOUBLE YELLOW TRAFFIC STRIPESITE KEYNOTESAS.4S.5DO NOT ENTERBEGIN ONE WAY30" X 30"24" X 30"R5-1R6-X1A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED FOR PARKING WITHIN THE SETBACK OF THE COMMON LOT LINE WITHCHANHASSEN & CHASKA.VARIANCE REQUEST River Valley Industrial Center - Project Narrative August 3, 2021 The proposed project, River Valley Industrial Center will be a Class A multi-tenant industrial facility. It is our intent to design the facility so that it is divisible down to 7,500sf with each tenant having their own recessed entry along with dock and drive in access to their warehouse. This small bay market has been ignored by developers in the Twin Cities for years. We believe this building could create a base of smaller users that will hopefully grow in the Chanhassen and Chaska communities in the years to come. We are a family based, local real estate company (our offices are in Chaska) with 1.5 million square feet of mostly industrial property. It is our intent to remain in the community and be long term holders of this proposed building. Plans for the building and site work are being submitted by our architectural and civil engineering consultants. The proposed access for automobile traffic will be off of Audubon Road and truck traffic from Stoughton Avenue. The planned curb cut location off of Audubon is important for ease of access into the development area and the success of the project. The previously submitted traffic report supports the location of the proposed access point and shows the locations of new pavement markings on Audubon Road to provide adequate traffic control and turn lanes for the project entrance. Since there is no available public sanitary sewer and watermain service for the development, there will be a private onsite septic system and new water well constructed to support the project. The location of the proposed septic and well facilities are shown on the Utility Plan. The new well will be used for domestic water needs within the proposed building. The existing onsite well and storage tank will be used for supplying water to the building’s fire suppression system and the fire hydrants being proposed on the property. We look forward to a successful development in your community and would invite you to contact me or any of our development team for questions about this project. Thank you! Joel Buttenhoff Cornerstone Investors LLC 102 Jonathan Blvd. N #200 Chaska MN 55318 WEST ELEVATION LEFT HALF 8 9 10 1176 WEST ELEVATION - RIGHT HALF 3 412 5 6 NORTHWEST ELEVATION concrete trowelled bands exposed aggregate metal at entrances aluminum dr framing solar grey glass CBA SOUTH ELEVATION 734526 345 126 EAST ELEVATION - RIGHT HALF 891011 7 EAST ELEVATION - LEFT HALF WEST ELEVATION 1 2 NORTHWEST ELEVATIONNORTH ELEVATION ACB EAST ELEVATION RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CHANHASSEN. MN SPEC. OFFICES FOR: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Aug 26, ‘21 charcoal colored metal panels red w/ black accent colored aggregate in concrete lights grey concrete horizontal and vertical accent bands light grey window framing w/ smoke colored glass RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CHANHASSEN. MN SPEC. OFFICES FOR: FINISH MATERIALS AND COLORS PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION PARTIAL NORTHWEST ELEVATION NORTHWEST ELEVATION PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CHANHASSEN. MN SPEC. OFFICES FOR: FINISH MATERIALS AND COLORS 1200exterior building materials on facade viewed by the public: Total facade to 12’height = 820x12 = 9840 sq ft North: entrys and windows - 164 sq ft articulation-troweled conc - 96 textured panels - 960 NW: entrys and windows - 600 sq ft textured panels(below wdw) - 120 West: entrys and windows - 1896 sq ft articulation-troweled conc - 1392 textured panels - 2832 South: entrys and windows - 136 sq ft articulation-troweled conc - 96 textured panels - 224 troweled conc panels - 1344 entrys and windows - 2796 sq ft 28% articulation-troweled conc - 1584 16 textured panels - 4136 42 troweled conc panels - 1344 14 foundation plantings 511’x30” hi overstory trees @ building 6 upper level windows provided TOTALS Aug 26, ‘21 Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212, Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 Office (952) 466-5200 | Fax (952) 466-5223 | www.co.carver.mn.us CARVER COUNTY August 26, 2021 City of Chanhassen c/o Bob Generous AICP Senior Planner 952-227-1131 bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Re: Development / Access Review Comments: Preliminary Plat and Site Plan for 2100 Stoughton Avenue (River Valley Industrial Center) located at PID #250030700 and #301370090 adjacent to County State Aid Highway 61 (Chaska Blvd.) and the intersection of CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject development in the City of Chanhassen. The County assumes compliance with State Statute 505.03 Subdivision 2 regarding road authority review. Consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and County Codes, the following are comments and recommended conditions of approval and potential requirements for any necessary permits to be issued for the project: 1. Regarding access a. No direct access to CSAH 61 is proposed. Additional County review and approval will be required if this condition changes. b. The proposed access from the site to Audubon Rd. (City street) is approximately 350 ft. from the intersection of CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. and shows planned impacts to the left turn lane serving the southern leg of the intersection. New local road access on local roads near County intersections is guided to be approximately 660 ft. from the intersection or at the greatest distance possible considering site constraints in order to avoid impacts to turn lanes serving the County Highway intersection and to minimize conflicts with traffic turning on to and off of the County Highway. In addition, the adopted CSAH 61/TH 41 Corridor Study final report identifies the future roadway concept for this intersection, which includes a median on the south leg of the intersection for at least 400 ft. south of the intersection (Link to adopted study, See page 39). i. Revise the proposed site plan regarding the access on Audubon Rd. to remove the access or shift it further south for consistency with adopted corridor study and to mitigate impacts to the CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. intersection. 2. Regarding highway right of way a. CSAH 61 at this location is a 2-lane undivided rural roadway facility with a continuous left turn lane and no trail facilities. The existing total right of way is approximately 115 ft. with approximately 55 ft. from centerline on the southeast side adjacent to the subject parcel. b. The County’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Figure B.6) identifies typical section widths for existing and future County highway facilities. The planned future typical section for this highway, per corridor study, is for a 2-lane divided urban roadway with the trail on the southeast side, which requires 65 ft. from centerline. i. Revise the preliminary plat to incorporate a minimum of 10 ft. additional right of way dedication adjacent to CSAH 61 from the existing right of way for a total of 65 ft. from centerline. ii. A sight triangle right of way dedication from the required right of way dedication for 100 feet along CSAH 61 and 80 feet along Audubon Rd. is required on the southeast corner of the CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. intersection. iii. Right of way along Audubon Rd. should be preserved by dedication for consistency with the CSAH 61/Audubon Rd. intersection plans as well as for any future pedestrian facilities planned by the Cities such as a sidewalk or trail along the east side of Audubon Rd. 3. Regarding pedestrian facilities a. There is currently no pedestrian crossing infrastructure for the south or eastern legs of the CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. intersection adjacent to the proposed development. i. Work with the County to install crosswalk and pedestrian traffic signal system improvements for the southern and eastern legs of the intersection including installation of ADA compliant curb ramp(s) at the southeast corner of the intersection adjacent to the proposed development. An internal pedestrian connection on the site from this corner is recommended. 4. Regarding traffic impacts a. The memo titled Buttenhoff Industrial Trip Generation and Access dated June 30, 2021 did not include analysis of the CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. intersection. i. Traffic operations need to be studied and reviewed for the CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. intersection. Information is needed regarding the northbound left from Audubon Rd. onto CSAH 61 to analyze the impact of the added traffic to the intersection. Coordinate with County staff regarding traffic split assignments, trip generation calculations, and future traffic projections to use for this analysis. ii. Provide truck turning templates to and from CSAH 61 and for each turn lane on Audubon Rd. 5. Regarding final approval and permitting a. The County will need to review and approve the final grading plans adjacent to CSAH 61. A grading permit will be required for grading work within the highway right of way. b. The technical details of the final plat, its boundaries and form(s) will need to be reviewed and approved by the County Surveyor. c. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way, the applicant shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility or Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) from Carver County Public Works: (https://www.co.carver.mn.us/departments/public-works/quick-links/permits). Final details of locations, grades, and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed and approved prior to any permits. d. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on County highways from current or approved conditions will need to remedied or updated at development expense, including costs incurred by the County. These are the County’s comments at this time. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please contact staff noted below: Joan Guthmiller Administrative Technician Carver County Public Works 952.466.5201 jguthmiller@co.carver.mn.us Angie Stenson AICP Sr. Transportation Planner Carver County Public Works 952.466.5273 astenson@co.carver.mn.us Dan McCormick, P.E. PTOE Traffic Services Supervisor Carver County Public Works 952.466.5208 dmccormick@co.carver.mn.us MEMORANDUM TBPLS Firm No. 10074302 Date: June 30, 2021 Re: Buttenhoff Industrial Trip Generation and Access File #0024684.00 To: Daniel Parks, P.E., Senior Project Manager From: Paul Villaluz, P.E., PTOE, RSP1 Christopher Topacio This memorandum has been prepared to address the following transportation-related aspects of the proposed 82,500 square foot Buttenhoff Industrial project: • Trip Generation • Trip Distribution • Trip Assignment • Total Intersection Volumes • Left Turn Storage Bay Analysis A Preliminary Concept Site Plan is shown on the next page. Trip Generation The 10th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual was used to estimate the number of vehicle trips that could be generated by the project. This manual is a standard reference used by municipalities and public agencies throughout the United States. The trip generation characteristics included in the manual are summarized by general land use type and are based on actual trip generation studies performed at numerous locations in areas of various populations. Trip generation for the proposed Buttenhoff Industrial project is based on average rates during the AM and PM peak hours for a general light industrial land use (ITE Land Use Code 110). The resulting trip generation is summarized in Table 1. Calculations are provided in Appendix A. 789512899891086INFILTRATION PONDPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXXXXXSSTEEEESPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANBUILDINGTRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENTPER DOC NO. A455245AUDUBON ROAD STATE HIGWAY NO. 212STOUGHTON AVENUE125 .00 30.00' 25.00' PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACKTRUCK ENTRANCEFULL ACCESSAUTO ONLY ENTRANCEPROPOSED LOT = 9.01 AC12'62'35.29'35.25'54.93' 26'26.00'REMAINDER LOT = 15.17 ACPOSSIBLE LOT LINECITY OF CHASKA73.35'R60.00 'INFILTRATION POND82,500 SF BUILDING134 PARKING STALLSDRAIN FIELDINFILTRATION PONDPOSSIBLE LOT LINESHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:HORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0031776.00\DWG\EXHIBITS\0031776TRUCKTURNEXHIBIT.DWG CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA05/11/2021...BUTTENHOFF INDUSTRIALCONCEPT SITE PLAN& TRUCK MOVEMENTS21000 STATE HIGHWAY 7EXCELSIOR, MN 55331BUTTENHOFF INDUSTRIAL104/27/2021.XX/XX/XX...XX/XX/XXXX/XX/XXJOEL BUTTENHOFF..© 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'40'80'120'1" = 40'40'8' or 4'..........PROJECT NUMBER: 0031776.00PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLCONCRETE PAVEMENTNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSTRANSFORMERSITE LIGHTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDFENCEXXHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTRAFFIC SIGNPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGEND5TSteering AngleLock to Lock TimeArticulating AngleWB-67Trailer TrackTractor TrackTrailer WidthTractor Width19.504.00feet8.508.50:8.008.00:::0.003.0045.5015.0053.00:::6.028.475.0 June 30, 2021 Page 3 0024684.00 Table 1 – Buttenhoff Industrial Trip Generation ITE Code Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 110 General Light Industrial 82.5 ksf GFA 205 204 409 51 7 58 7 45 52 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition According to the latest ITE Trip Generation Manual (see Appendix A), trucks are anticipated to comprise 3% of the AM peak hour trips and 2% of the PM peak hour trips. Using these percentages, two trucks are anticipated to access the site during the AM peak hour and one truck is anticipated to access the site during the PM peak hour. Trip Distribution The directional distribution of project traffic quantifies the percentage of project-generated traffic that arrives and departs the project site in each direction by type of use. The primary trip distribution quantifies the percentage of site-generated traffic that generally arrives and departs the project site along the same route. Primary trips are new trips to the street network and project driveways. Figure 1 illustrates the anticipated primary project trip distribution for the Buttenhoff Industrial project. The primary trip distribution is based on anticipated access restrictions and internal circulation through each project driveway, anticipated trip origins and destinations with the surrounding areas, and engineering judgment. It is assumed that 90% of the total trip vehicles (cars and trucks) will access the site via the Audubon driveway. It is assumed that both proposed driveway locations will have full access – no left or right turn movements into and out of the driveway locations will be prohibited. Trip Assignment Project traffic assignment was calculated by applying the primary trip distribution percentages found in Figure 1 to the primary project trip generation found in Table 1. The resulting traffic assignments at the intersections are illustrated in Figure 2 for the primary trip assignment. POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXFFE=759.46FFE=760.00SSTEEEESPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHTRANSMISSIONLINE TOWERBUILDINGRETAINING WALLELECTRICCABINETTRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENTPER DOC NO. A455245AUDUBON ROADSTATE HIGWAY NO. 212STOUGHTON AVENUEAREA NOT SURVEYED125.00SSSSSTSIGNROCK LANDSCAPINGGUARD RAILWEMAILTTRUCK ENTRANCEFULL ACCESSAUTO ONLY ENTRANCEPROPOSED LOT= 9.02 ACREMAINDER LOT= 15.16 ACPROPOSED LOT LINECITY OF CHASKAR60'INFILTRATIONPONDDRAIN FIELDINFILTRATION PONDPROPOSED LOT LINESTOUGHTON AVENUEPROPOSEDINDUSTRIALBUILDING81,660 SFSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:HORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0031776.00\DWG\EXHIBITS\210617_0031776AUDUBON STRIPING WITH VOLGRAPH.DWG CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA06/22/2021...BUTTENHOFF INDUSTRIALAUDUBON DRIVE PRELIMINARYAM/PM TRIP DISTRIBUTION21000 STATE HIGHWAY 7EXCELSIOR, MN 55331BUTTENHOFF INDUSTRIAL104/27/2021..JOEL BUTTENHOFF----© 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'70'140'210'1" = 70'70'14' or 7'..........PROJECT NUMBER: 0031776.00PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLCONCRETE PAVEMENTNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSTRANSFORMERSITE LIGHTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDFENCEXXHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTRAFFIC SIGNPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGEND5T STOPSTOPSTOPSTOP06/14/21 POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXFFE=759.46FFE=760.00SSTEEEESPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHTRANSMISSIONLINE TOWERBUILDINGRETAINING WALLELECTRICCABINETTRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENTPER DOC NO. A455245AUDUBON ROADSTATE HIGWAY NO. 212STOUGHTON AVENUEAREA NOT SURVEYED125.00SSSSSTSIGNROCK LANDSCAPINGGUARD RAILWEMAILTTRUCK ENTRANCEFULL ACCESSAUTO ONLY ENTRANCEPROPOSED LOT= 9.02 ACREMAINDER LOT= 15.16 ACPROPOSED LOT LINECITY OF CHASKAR60'INFILTRATIONPONDDRAIN FIELDINFILTRATION PONDPROPOSED LOT LINESTOUGHTON AVENUEPROPOSEDINDUSTRIALBUILDING81,660 SFSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:HORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0031776.00\DWG\EXHIBITS\210617_0031776AUDUBON STRIPING WITH VOLGRAPH.DWG CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA06/22/2021...BUTTENHOFF INDUSTRIALAUDUBON DRIVE PRELIMINARYTRIP ASSIGNMENT21000 STATE HIGHWAY 7EXCELSIOR, MN 55331BUTTENHOFF INDUSTRIAL204/27/2021.06/14/21.JOEL BUTTENHOFF----© 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'70'140'210'1" = 70'70'14' or 7'..........PROJECT NUMBER: 0031776.00PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLCONCRETE PAVEMENTNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSTRANSFORMERSITE LIGHTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDFENCEXXHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTRAFFIC SIGNPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGEND5T STOPSTOPSTOPSTOP June 30, 2021 Page 4 0024684.00 Total Intersection Volumes In order to approximate intersection operations at the two project driveway locations, Annual Daily Traffic (ADT) information was collected at Audubon Road and at Stoughton Avenue from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT Traffic Forecasting & Analysis, 2018). Figure 3. ADT information on Stoughton Avenue Figure 4. ADT information on Audubon Road It is assumed that both of the peak hours represent 10% of the ADT. The assumed vehicles per hour were calculated by taking 10% of the most recent ADT and dividing it by 2 to indicate how many vehicles will travel in each direction. Therefore, 189 vehicles per hour (3750 x 0.10 =375. 375/2 = 188.5) are assumed to travel northbound and southbound during both AM and PM peak hours along Audubon Road at Project Driveway A. 115 vehicles per hour (2300 x 0.10 =230. 230/2= 115) are assumed to travel eastbound and westbound along Stoughton Avenue at Project Driveway B. These volumes have been added to trip assignment in Figure 2. Total volumes are included on Figure 5. POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXFFE=759.46FFE=760.00SSTEEEESPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHTRANSMISSIONLINE TOWERBUILDINGRETAINING WALLELECTRICCABINETTRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENTPER DOC NO. A455245AUDUBON ROADSTATE HIGWAY NO. 212STOUGHTON AVENUEAREA NOT SURVEYED125.00SSSSSTSIGNROCK LANDSCAPINGGUARD RAILWEMAILTTRUCK ENTRANCEFULL ACCESSAUTO ONLY ENTRANCEPROPOSED LOT= 9.02 ACREMAINDER LOT= 15.16 ACPROPOSED LOT LINECITY OF CHASKAR60'INFILTRATIONPONDDRAIN FIELDINFILTRATION PONDPROPOSED LOT LINESTOUGHTON AVENUEPROPOSEDINDUSTRIALBUILDING81,660 SFSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:HORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0031776.00\DWG\EXHIBITS\210617_0031776AUDUBON STRIPING WITH VOLGRAPH.DWG CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA06/22/2021...BUTTENHOFF INDUSTRIALAUDUBON DRIVE PRELIMINARYTOTAL VOLUMES21000 STATE HIGHWAY 7EXCELSIOR, MN 55331BUTTENHOFF INDUSTRIAL504/27/2021.06/14/21.JOEL BUTTENHOFF----© 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'70'140'210'1" = 70'70'14' or 7'..........PROJECT NUMBER: 0031776.00PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLCONCRETE PAVEMENTNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSTRANSFORMERSITE LIGHTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDFENCEXXHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTRAFFIC SIGNPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGEND5T STOPSTOPSTOPSTOP June 30, 2021 Page 5 0024684.00 Left Turn Storage Bay Analysis Left turn storage bay analyses for the study intersections are provided for the projected conditions with site. The analyses are based on the traffic volumes as illustrated in Figure 3. The analysis uses the 95th percentile left turn queue lengths reported by Vistro (see Appendix B). Table 2 summarizes the results of the analysis. The desired storage reported in Table 2 is the larger of the AM and PM values. Table 2 - Left Turn Storage Bay Analysis Intersection Left Turn Movement Available/Desired Storage per Lane (ft) Existing Projected Conditions with Site Storage Vistro Queue Intersection Control Unsignalized Intersection #2 Audubon Road and Project Driveway A WB On-Site 1.17’ SB 100’ 2.28’ Intersection Control Unsignalized Intersection #4 Stoughton Avenue and Project Driveway B EB Shared 0.66’ SB On-Site 0.71’ Conclusions and Recommendations Figure 6 illustrates the proposed intersection markings on Audubon Road at the Project Driveway. A 100-foot long storage bay length for southbound ingressing left turn traffic will be provided on Audubon Road. This proposed left turn storage bay is anticipated to have adequate storage for the projected demand. POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSSTEEEAUDUBON ROADFULL ACCESSAUTO ONLY ENTRANCEINFILTRATIONPONDSTOUGHTON AVENUEPROPOSED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING81,660 SFSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:HORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0031776.00\DWG\EXHIBITS\0031776AUDUBONSTRIPING.DWG CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA06/14/21...BUTTENHOFF INDUSTRIALAUDUBON DRIVE PRELIMINARYLANE CONFIGURATION21000 STATE HIGHWAY 7EXCELSIOR, MN 55331BUTTENHOFF INDUSTRIAL604/27/2021.06/14/21.JOEL BUTTENHOFF----© 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'20'40'60'1" = 20'20'4' or 2'..........PROJECT NUMBER: 0031776.00PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLCONCRETE PAVEMENTNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSTRANSFORMERSITE LIGHTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDFENCEXXHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTRAFFIC SIGNPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGEND5T June 22, 2021 0024684.00 APPENDIX A TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS APPENDIX C OF TRIP GENERATION MANUAL Buttenhoff Industrial ITE Trip Generation - 10th Edition Equation Type: T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends AM Peak Hour One hour between 7AM to 9AM (Adjacent Street) T = 1,000 SF GFA Entering Exiting T = Entering*Exiting* *Rounding may occur in calculations PM Peak Hour One hour between 4PM to 6PM (Adjacent Street) T = 1,000 SF GFA Entering*Exiting T = Entering*Exiting* *Rounding may occur in calculations Weekday Daily Weekday T = 1,000 SF GFA Entering Exiting T = Entering*Exiting* *Rounding may occur in calculations Pass-By Reduction AM AM PM PM AM AM PM PM *Rounding may occur in calculations *Rounding may occur in calculations General Light Industrial 0 Entering 0 Exiting 0% 0% Non Pass-By Trip Ends:Pass-By Trip Ends: 0 Entering 0 ExitingEntering Entering Exiting Exiting7 51 7 45 Variable (X):1,000 SF GFA Number of (X):82.5 58 52 CIT R0031776.000 Land Use Code: Average Rate 110 (X) *0.63 Trip Ends Per 13%87% Trip Ends 7 45 Trip Ends 51 Project Name: TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS Calculations by:Date:Project #:June 07, 2021 100% (X) *4.96 Trip Ends Per 50%50% Directional Distribution: Trip Ends 205 205409 100% Non Pass-By Trip End Percentage Pass-By Trip End Percentage 7 Directional Distribution: Directional Distribution: (X) *0.70 Trip Ends Per 88%12% June 22, 2021 0024684.00 APPENDIX B VISTRO CALCULATIONS 0.004Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 7: Audubon Road and Project Driveway A Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100110No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Project Driveway AAudubon RoadAudubon RoadName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 522094010205Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 115210251Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 52192379189Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 5243791Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 0018800188Base Volume Input [veh/h] Project Driveway AAudubon RoadAudubon RoadName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AM WSButtenhoff Industrial 6/22/2021 1 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.81d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.091.240.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.450.290.002.280.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.020.010.000.090.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABAAAAMovement LOS 9.3311.970.007.740.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.030.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AM WSButtenhoff Industrial 6/22/2021 2 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 0.001Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 8.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 12: Stoughton Avenue and Project Driveway B Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 000010No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Stoughton AvenueStoughton AvenueProject Driveway BName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 1130126510Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 03332100Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 1120116510Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 151510Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 0115115000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Stoughton AvenueStoughton AvenueProject Driveway BName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AM WSButtenhoff Industrial 6/22/2021 3 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with AIntersection LOS 0.18d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 0.000.298.92d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.260.260.080.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.010.010.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAABMovement LOS 0.000.000.007.488.9210.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AM WSButtenhoff Industrial 6/22/2021 4 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Detail 6/22/2021Report File: N:\...\X_AM WS.pdf Scenario 3 AM WSVistro File: N:\...\210607 Buttenhoff Industrial Vistro.vistro Buttenhoff Industrial 243 0 13 0 - 230 Total Volume 1 0 1 0 1.00 0 Right 120 0 5 0 1.00 115 Thru Westbound 116 0 1 0 1.00 115 Thru 5 0 5 0 1.00 0 Left Eastbound 1 0 1 0 1.00 0 Right 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 Left Southbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Stoughton Avenue and Project Driveway B 12 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 434 0 58 0 - 376 Total Volume 5 0 5 0 1.00 0 Right 2 0 2 0 1.00 0 Left Westbound 192 0 4 0 1.00 188 Thru 37 0 37 0 1.00 0 Left Southbound 9 0 9 0 1.00 0 Right 189 0 1 0 1.00 188 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Audubon Road and Project Driveway A 7 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 3: 3 AM WSButtenhoff Industrial 6/22/2021 5 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 0.015Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 11.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 7: Audubon Road and Project Driveway A Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100110No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Project Driveway AAudubon RoadAudubon RoadName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 35920552209Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 92511152Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 32818952192Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3281524Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 0018800188Base Volume Input [veh/h] Project Driveway AAudubon RoadAudubon RoadName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PM WSButtenhoff Industrial 6/22/2021 1 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with BIntersection LOS 1.02d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 9.880.180.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.291.170.000.280.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.130.050.000.010.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABAAAAMovement LOS 9.5211.250.007.660.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.040.020.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PM WSButtenhoff Industrial 6/22/2021 2 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 0.001Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 9.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 12: Stoughton Avenue and Project Driveway B Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 000010No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Stoughton AvenueStoughton AvenueProject Driveway BName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0126130141Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 03233010Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 0116120141Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 015141Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 0115115000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Stoughton AvenueStoughton AvenueProject Driveway BName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PM WSButtenhoff Industrial 6/22/2021 3 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with AIntersection LOS 0.20d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 0.000.069.12d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.050.050.330.1095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.010.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAAAMovement LOS 0.000.000.007.478.919.94d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PM WSButtenhoff Industrial 6/22/2021 4 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Detail 6/22/2021Report File: N:\...\X_PM WS.pdf Scenario 4 PM WSVistro File: N:\...\210607 Buttenhoff Industrial Vistro.vistro Buttenhoff Industrial 242 0 12 0 - 230 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 Right 116 0 1 0 1.00 115 Thru Westbound 120 0 5 0 1.00 115 Thru 1 0 1 0 1.00 0 Left Eastbound 4 0 4 0 1.00 0 Right 1 0 1 0 1.00 0 Left Southbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Stoughton Avenue and Project Driveway B 12 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 428 0 52 0 - 376 Total Volume 32 0 32 0 1.00 0 Right 8 0 8 0 1.00 0 Left Westbound 189 0 1 0 1.00 188 Thru 5 0 5 0 1.00 0 Left Southbound 2 0 2 0 1.00 0 Right 192 0 4 0 1.00 188 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Audubon Road and Project Driveway A 7 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 4: 4 PM WSButtenhoff Industrial 6/22/2021 5 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTYOFCARVER ) Kim City C k \ Subscribed and thiQ(z9day o S to befo me f SGCKLING l.aobry PlJilo.lt ln Esta ra,Od -oi E?ara It ll' ,E!a Notary Public ,2021 CITY OF CHANHASSEN I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on August 26, 2021, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk ofthe City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy ofthe attached notice of Public Hearing to Consider a Request for Subdivision of Two Parcels into Three Lots and One Outlot and Site Ptan Review for Development of an Approximately 82'000 SF One-Story Offrce-Warehouse Building @iver Valley Industrial Center), Zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP), Planning Case No.202l-19 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy ofsaid notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses ofsuch owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota" and by other appropriate records. JEAN M Subiect Parcel OiBclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a suNey and is .ot intended to be used as one. This map is a compilatton of records, informatlon and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources rcgarding the area shown, and is to be u+d for reference purposes only. The City does not wanant that lhe Geographic lnformation Sysiem (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are eror free. and the Cily does not represent that the Gls Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other pwpose requidng exacting measurement of distance or dhecton or precjsion in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota statutes s466.03, subd. 2'1 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims and agrees to deEnd, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by lJser, its employees or agents, or thid partjes which arise out of the use,'s access or use of data Provided. (TAX_NAME,D (TAX-ADD_LI D (TAX ADD L2D (Next RecordD(TAX_NAME)D (TAX_ADD_Ll )t (TAX ADD L2D Obclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one This map is a compilaton of records. information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offi@s and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used ior reference purposes only. The Clty does not wanant that the Geographic lnfomation System (GlS) Data used to prepa.e this map are enor free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacling measurement of distance ol direction or precision in the depiction of geographic featu.es. The preceding disclaimer is provrded pursuant to Minnesota statutes s466.03, SuM. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable lor any damages, and expressly waives all daims, and agrees to defend, indemnify. and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User. its employees or agents, or third partes which arjse oul of the us€is access or use of data provided. \ ,./ A \ ! Subject Parcel qo F. O,oo5OE(o 6€ NEo6i(\E 3EEo .Eed- oE j-q EE OE.r! E2 @ o) ([ =ooFt- tli o) -o E(5 -c ocaoo (!- Eb frE:6Y;EoEa ;E+E93Y oEqEE; o.9 iHt > tl-- o;o= E E 5d .A G- U Eo*8b ',', 6 Q .9 o cv- ttE (5N f, E=3Ea5 OE H o6Igotr: o = iNEi 3 g, EESE o-9 6 -6 )J ot o c oco o-(I, o-cc o) l d) o)o oi o I o p o> EO>E<E 6.e -- E' Or @E tst N< (.) Ic.r0f-Eto -^ r O€ E'= E E 1,E€ EE 5 EEee B re E'i€ s,e Et:E gEEE gEE! FEsP !sE; EEsP HEee- EE:B ;iEgF EgEE ;EEiE =EE =,ES.EFgdr= (,, (5 o = -6+9F(EC(JU,rN(9\t q^(, l6i.>c' ;ioB;,= PA::e EEEE :5EB P s)o)P; !-o l\ c (5-c 6 c=F(!_Qyc) cO- (D-cEqc6P(E:L " (tE E:E"iEaBE;s 8 8.,4fi9o (t)-c f =^cp:.EE; B€= 5c XtsodC)B=-9, o, or'E Fii E E.EEFF =oi NoN o E (,oollt C' (, (., 'i; ao oEdbqo: =c -E3i8qo6 co =t=:r il ; 8 gl: 6 ql o(E !te* El3;tt8o ._jt-c O YJ(J'6'(9 rx ol o*fl >r(,) ol- - Fl-< ol(., :6N E tgTE ES)E ots; (,-o (o 6 o E !2 ==o a't o) (g o) o- ci-Ei! (,,)q)oo)E8 rlr a56 orB OCb9-ot PE6s) EC)f_oo_ig 6+0'ro-/, =->o='=o ^oF-! a f a.9 o 0) E = c fc E c 0) o.c,cocq'6 ; =; uioEcoo)(E o)ocv (l,)/n d)v Eq; 5E€o,}l 9. -(r,65Eoo0) qo iHo: -(!€9!!+ CJ(\,O '6(! EI"o6oo,> .; o,o=p6 eEo< cEo)L6ui =9urHz.& ffig EE;EE IE,EEEi iEEEiEgEEEiBiEii EeE iiffiEEggEiEig EEi EgieeEagEIiir ;EEsiEiiEEEEiSEEa A;eEi;E:iiicEEEESE6. I E e 6 E 6 q o i: 06 il, (go o (,ooJ too o o- ii(, Bo E(, I o- 96, 6' .= o-xo=--, .g.E c6 ..o9ECoo tD=OE =oo<) o Eo!, =Egro .=.l! 8.9 rE .9oEo5tDo- .= oEot!.9d OEz3 or! t! o EDtr oo = .B.E (!la a, .=IEoE=o€odE OE eE E1za oo(g .Cct! o ee F..o Eb O- q;o€OcN3; 6€ NE 3E 6E a_- oEj-s(5= -a(l)E .Jg E d) (g oot-N ,J' o E(5 -c oc f (.) o- st Q ! x-C:oEaE A6';o + E frg Q o b .-.,. o€ iH = >9= o;o: = E 5d .a E,r 3 Ee*85 B aoE ocv-U,ts o c\l :,6<@9 tD ll >.:1r (l)zi .EIS -QE Y.; -c o oY ()-Q 6-6 JJ v; 0) c c)co o6 o-cco =co 6o o o g o B o Po> 6E>={c -o6.e E,!fEOc6e5t N< g_ -0r.d =-- .. Ifi P= I EB 6-6 Pi: E]eEE -oE 5 EEge a+;E SEEE e'Eet Ee,qH :'eEEE o Y O () hoao ^ o.c t 6 o 6 =El,o ko.Z@x"aE== B='Hi 3.eiz* E =;:d =g€E EEEE,3 glE: icEt U *E*-= sE35FE F(DcLJ(,TN(v)S . ,9- (D o B E O -E>h< E c 6 0.) E oEfr . oE $,e"8 p ffse Ea€eEEg ?i trl =6 6E > e ;lE iE# Eo.2lo,b c=l- R -El9 6 ! i crii El o.EL 6€ --il 8E PB eE' :q;l€EE=-EE EHsae.E;H:: clr O (Il -c r'= = ol(9 E a - E cEEI;: EE= 5 E5N fi=AEiB HgH gfi f; E,F o =o o E ; fo =o (\aoN o ; iooo G'E tll q '6ti; !2 o (5oo Ei,,,EOoooo)c(ELdo^: rl) o= OCb9 a? : d.) Ed)f'o9o:o o!+ OBo' .n = ^>.o='to o9 U;(E E 6q, (tr oro Eoto) +- o),> 9-a65Eooo)EEaqo, iE a(t): l, . GOo o-> o-q N !).i (Eruocl,co64 9E;o- tr EE; !sH =cc 6rtr^ca ui .". =g;5 [t "e " EE I6: ! !O IP-o BaEi IiE EE$: IEe E&EB IoC.iYooP l aoe '*;i6E =::EEEES EEgsgEEE E€E3E: EE E! 55 ,E F 9 : AAEEESg EE;EiEEE ::gEgfiE: T $:dEH:: e iEs58E3E fiEEEEEHiE c EiE EEaEE .6-eqQio€E 3T53.EE;:E ETBE E;EE"1 ao:oFp=!i; ifi:EEEsiE EE€-r*ae;;'E6e.E*'oF;e 5B€:EE{EEI s:-5 E:!;5 EEg[E;EEE -.si E:*Piq,E €e€:F E5i : EEE-sp5e SEboE oii. Foq66IE> .;EE9tFt EPE:g €Be fl€?EE EEE EA'EE iEE E;ffi{ -!P|+ .6i F E8€ Eif Ps i:E Ei:gEi6< e .Eo;6aE Ei;PP s 9; *i;;59s: Bl;BF.it99 YqaE9i E.= EEcEE:E* iE;EE gi!EEEEE €: e +s; ;; EE€ EHiE E EEEeiEt*E S iE;E ;;?E+ i1;eEEq!F;.iEE!3!3E1 IEiE€i;EEE:lE.oooEooFo, a; E F €(, !!o o lE()oJ o =o c, I o- >Etsoo'EtL tgetOJ 9elt d, .=o-?o- :{i=so,.g.t =E 06 ..o9t=Eoo o=(,Efooo >EtooEcL(,PtLJ .::llloo o o- ooo o o O OO O Fra O O O Fr o O O A o O OO F{ oO O O oi6 5 E 5 5 5 ; : a -r 6 o !^ .o -r o C| 6 o o L^ !'r sr rn .! rn o r'{ o5 = F'; - 6 F- o cb.{ o = o o.r .r o F sr.! o o o o o o ln o.'r5 6 b -i ; ; ; o .i o = o 6 6 o o 6.!.r o o o o o Q o o o Frm s +.n F. 6 + < Or d) m m Ol f"l Oo F\ oo @ sl oo 9 =HHEHHHHHHHHHHHftHHHHHHHHHHHHHH o =F (, o *.zz:oo3-i3(,0r!flEoo .{ooclLr)Oool(\ E e i(3iz_,=9l:<tl9SBtrv)l^92 EEE= c) rJ] a! lnNO.nFst.oo@ il H .P 8 *-**[-;Rfi EHs EEB=E miEEiIin ig3mfrfrfififrff=?ff=. 3'EE*aeEE E aEE i EiSE g aE E E g E 3EE EE E 8 Exbsir:*=E=.,==Ea e? E IIiEEEEiiEcIEEEiH g gH=EE 3EEiEg*F -l F{ '-{ Fl Fl Fr .'l !"1 .l F{ EFOa* E,iHgJ4Et?>1 'r'Q z H 9r* * U5 Eg = 6 5E= = z\)3., EE = g,,ia.g i tri :EEEEEEEEEE=EEEEEEEEEgEEEEE giE IJJ IJJ UJ UJ TTJ T! zzzzz_zooooo<oFFFFF-I- (,L,(,(,193(,lSlflL^>ooooo>oT-FFFFEFt\ u\ vt t^ th \) u1oooooooO(OF-0o(OO\O!-r Fr F{ Fl N st <)a! r-l -l t"{ r'l .{ N oo F oazzzzZzZJJJJ@Jcotitisi-<9999?9?d.d.d.c.-E-.EU(J(J(J(J()UOFTOOOOAOOsla{Oool/)(nrninrn(nrn.{ Fl !-.1 r-.1 r-l a{ r'{ N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, September 7, 2021 Subject Approve Planning Commission Minutes dated August 17, 2021 Section APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item No: C.1. Prepared By Jean Steckling, Senior Admin. Support Specialist File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the minutes from its August 17, 2021 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated August 17, 2021 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 17, 2021 CALL TO ORDER: Noyes called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and noted the Chair and Vice Chair were absent so the Commission needed to nominate someone to be Chair Pro-Tempore. Alto nominated Noyes to be Chair Pro-Tempore for the meeting. Johnson seconded. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. MEMBERS PRESENT: Eric Noyes, Erik Johnson, Doug Reeder, and Kelsey Alto. MEMBERS ABSENT: Steven Weick, Laura Skistad, Mark von Oven. STAFF PRESENT: MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner; Josh Storms, Community Development Intern. PUBLIC PRESENT: Merle Steinkraus 1800 Lake Lucy Road Diane Steinkraus 1800 Lake Lucy Road Tim Johnson 6287 Chaska Road Chair Pro-Tempore Noyes reviewed guidelines for conducting the Planning Commission meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: PLANNING CASE 2021-16: APPROVE A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) WITHIN AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1800 LAKE LUCY ROAD Associate Planner Young-Walters presented a summary packet of information. The property at 1800 Lake Lucy Road is zoned rural residential (RR) and has a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. The lot is 2.57 acres, has about 14.82% lot cover, and the home and accessory structures meet all setback requirements of the RR district. The Applicant is requesting a variance as part of an already approved building permit; they bumped out the garage and received permission to add a mudroom, washer/dryer, master bathroom, and bedroom. However, because they want to add a kitchen, it technically qualifies as a second dwelling unit. City Code allows the granting of a variance to allow a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling assuming it meets certain criteria. The Applicant has stated they would like to use it as an accessory dwelling unit so they can live with their children; the father has developed a heart condition which has made this arrangement desirable. Section 20-59 allows the use of single-family as two-family if they meet four conditions: demonstrated need based upon disability, age, or financial hardship; the dwelling has the exterior appearance of a single-family dwelling; separate utility services may not be established; and the variance will not be injurious to or adversely affect the neighborhood or surrounding residents. Staff believes the Applicant meets all four criteria and recommends that Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2021 2 the variance be approved, subject to conditions preventing the future use as a rental property; it may not be rented, must be occupied by a relative, must have unobstructed access between levels, and no separate utilities. Reeder asked, when the next family moves in, how does the City become aware that the utilities are not separate? Mr. Young-Walters noted separate utilities are easy because they must go to the City for a separate water meter. How does the City guarantee that it does not become a rental property? Much of it is honor system; if the City were to receive complaints from neighbors or see a listing for a rental property (because it is recorded against the deed), the City has more leverage to come in and clean it up. He clarified that the Applicant could still rent the entire house out as they have property rights, however, they cannot rent it as two units. Merle Steinkraus, Applicant, built the home 32 years ago and recently sold it to his son and daughter-in-law who have two small children. He noted it is a wonderful opportunity for the Steinkraus family to stay in the house and grow old. He clarified the intent is to keep it as a single-family home. Chair Pro-Tempore Noyes opened the public hearing. Chair Pro-Tempore Noyes closed the public hearing. Commissioner Johnson moved, Commissioner Alto seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommend the variance request for the use of a single-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling be approved, subject to the conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Decision Recommendations. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: APPROVE A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR LOT COVER AND SETBACK VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT A PORCH AND DECK ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6287 CHASKA ROAD Community Development Intern Josh Storms presented a summary packet of information. The lot is zoned Single-Family Residential and the property has a lot size of 21,205 feet with a lot cover percentage of 26.8%. The house has a non-conforming rear-yard setback of 17.4 feet and a non-conforming west side yard setback of 9.7 feet. The patio behind the garage is non- conforming at six feet and the patio at the southeast corner has a non-conforming setback of seven feet. The existing deck has a non-conforming rear yard setback of 20 feet and the property has a non-conforming retaining wall and stone path that crosses the west property line. The Applicant is proposing to replace the existing deck with a 3-season porch and replace the attached patio with a new deck, and are also proposing to remove the southeast attached patio, two sections of driveway, and the stone pathway. The Applicant has stated that they do not have the ability to construct a 3-season porch and deck meeting the 30-foot setback and have stated the porch will not extend any closer to the rear lot line than the existing deck and the existing attached patio will be replaced with a new deck with a setback of 17 feet. With the removal of both patios, two sections of driveway, existing deck, and stone pathway, the property will be just under 25% lot coverage. The City received four phone calls from neighbors of which three had Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2021 3 no concerns and were just curious; one neighbor asked if these changes would have any major effects on the rear yard’s visibility. The existing yard is already screened by vegetation and fencing, and the Applicant is proposing additional landscaping for a visual barrier. Staff believes these changes to the property will not have a visual impact on neighbors and the variance is a result of practical difficulties caused by the home’s location. The decrease and removal of existing non-conformities will bring the property closer to conforming with the City Code. Commissioner Reeder asked why it was built at the back of the lot; was it low up front? Mr. Storms said staff is not entirely sure but they know the home was constructed in 1987 and the original plans intended for the house to be much closer to the street. Commissioner Alto asked if the Applicant needs the neighbor’s permission to remove the walkway since it crosses the property line. Mr. Young-Walters replied, yes, technically they would, although he assumes the neighbors are not objecting to things being removed from their property but the Applicant can speak to that. Tim Johnson, LIVIT Site + Structure, is representing the client and has a family that is excited about the space and recently purchased the home unaware of some of these challenges. The clients are excited for the improvements and said it is a tough lot, and they do not know why the house was pushed back that far. The site is non-conforming and the Applicant has done everything they can to push or keep the porch in the existing deck location that is there today. They need to pull out the retaining walls as they are taking on water in the basement of the home; part of the project is to rebuild the retaining walls, increase the privacy, and landscape to get the hardscape to conform. Chair Pro-Tempore Noyes asked if the diverted water will stay on the property, will it absorb, or move off of the property. Mr. Johnson thinks it will slow the water down so it can stay in the planting beds and garden beds by elevating the retaining walls higher than they are today. Right now it is a negative grade right to the house so by building the walls high enough in the middle, it allows the water to go to the lot lines and drainage utility easements and run north. Chair Pro-Tempore Noyes opened the public hearing. Chair Pro-Tempore Noyes closed the public hearing. Commissioner Reeder clarified the Applicant would have to submit a drainage plan that would need to be approved. Mr. Young-Walters replied in the affirmative. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Reeder seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the 8.3 foot rear yard setback variance to construct a 3- season porch and a 13-foot rear yard setback variance to construct a deck be approved, subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopts of Findings of Fact and Decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2021 4 APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED JULY 20, 2021 Commissioner Alto noted the summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated July 20, 2021 as presented. CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE Mr. Young-Walters noted the Commissioners attended the ULI meeting and they will be discussing that more at the next meeting. He reminded them to please fill out the survey that was sent and they will do a summary of that with take-home points. He stated Agritourism was approved with a few modifications, the 21 lot subdivision south of Fox Wood was approved, and the 2-lot split off Eagle Ridge Road was approved. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Reeder moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:27 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Jean Steckling Sr. Admin Support Specialist PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, September 7, 2021 Subject City Council Action Update Section ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS Item No: D.1. Prepared By Jean Steckling, Senior Admin. Support Specialist File No:  ATTACHMENTS: City Council Action Update City Council Action Update MONDAY, AUGUST 23, 2021 Ordinance XXX: Approve Amendment to City Code Concerning Noise – Approved Minutes for these meetings can be viewed and downloaded from the city’s website at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us, and click on “Agendas and Minutes” from the left-side links.