Loading...
1985 12 11 e PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 11, 1985 Chairman Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:37 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT Steven Emmings, Robert Siegel, Bill Ryan, Ladd Conrad and Mike Thompson. MEMBERS ABSENT Howard Noziska STAFF PRESENT Barbara Dacy, City Planner, Jo Ann Olsen, Asst. City Planner, Bill Monk, City Engineer and Vicki Churchill, Secretary. PUBLIC HEARING Sunnybrook Development Corporation, Barney Schlender: e a. Site Plan Review #85-6 for a Country Inn and Conference Center on 33 Acres of Land Zoned P-4/P-3 and Located in Chanhassen Lakes Business Park between Hwy. 5 and Lake Susan; and b. Wetland Alteration Permit for a proposed road and to construct a country inn, restaurant, chapel and accessory recreational facilities on 33 acres of property zoned P-4, City of Chanhassen and Sunnybrook Development Corporation, applicants. Public Present Barney & Wanda Schlender C. Lundquist Lee & Lolly Borchert Michele Foster J. H. Ward Austin Ward Jerome Raidt W. J. Ward Sunnybrook Development Lundquist Architects 13809 Shelly Lane, Burnsville Opus Corp. 5916 Hansen Road, Minneapolis 226 Summit Ave., st. Paul 930 Baker Building, Minneapolis 1624 Harmon Place, Minneapolis - Olsen stated that this proposal was before the Planning Commission previously for the subdivision and rezoning requests. She stated that both requests were approved based on the motion stated in the staff report. She stated that the site plan proposal was tabled from the October 9, 1985 meeting until a wetland alteration permit could be processed, a lighting scheme could be proposed and an ele- vation from the lake could be submitted. She stated that with the proposal for a country inn, restaurant, chapel and accessory faci- lities, the applicant is proposing a realignment to the north for e e - Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 2 Lake Drive East. She stated that the applicants would like it to go north of the wetlands so that they can utilize the wetlands for drainage and grist mill. She stated that soil tests were conducted and found that this realignment is feasible if proper construction practices are used. She stated that a consequence of the realignment is the impact on the Ward property. She stated that it crosses the property and will result in a loss of about 300 feet of developable property. She stated that the Ward property to the north of the realignment is still large enough to be developed and subdivided to be used in the future. She stated that if the site plan is approved, the original Lake Drive East feasibility study must be amended to include this realignment. Revision of the realignment must be authorized by the City Council. If the realignment is eventually approved, she stated that staff is recommending that no building permit be issued for the Sunnybrook Inn until the construction plans for the realign- ment has been approved. She stated that the main building is located within 1000 feet from the ordinary high water mark of Lake Susan which is within the Shoreland Ordinance setbacks. She stated that this ordinance also regulates the height of buildings with a maximum of 35 feet and the proposed main building is 48 feet in height. She stated that the applicant is requesting a variance to this requirement. She stated that staff contacted DNR about this requirement and they stated that because of the existing heavy vegetation and the distance from the lake, the additional height should not pose any problems. She stated that the applicant is also proposing a walkway and gazebo which are located within the setback and will require grading because of the steep slope. She noted that if the walkway and gazebo are approved, the applicant should submit a detailed grading plan for city and DNR approval. She also noted that the applicant has submitted a more detailed landscaping and lighting plan that are acceptable; however, staff is recommending that the applicant landscape the parking lot islands to break up the large imper- vious surface. Olsen also explained that a wetlands alteration permit has been processed where the proposed grading will take place in the wetlands. She stated that the Al and A3 wetland will be altered with the construction of Lake Drive East and the A2 wetland, which is a dry wetland, will be graded to allow it to hold water. She stated that the amount of filling will be minimal and that the proposed plan will be an overall improvement by reducing the runoff. Bill Monk, City Engineer, stated that the applicant has presented data that the site can be developed as proposed. He stated that sanitary sewer exists along the north edge of Lake Susan and would be extended in with a service line from that trunk to ser- vice any building that would be on the site. He stated that a water trunk exists along County Road 17 which is stubbed to the e e e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 3 east over 1,000 feet and runs down into the well house facility at the northwest corner of Lake Susan. He stated that line would have to be extended as part of Lake Drive East construction and eventually linking wqith lines at T.H. 101 in Hidden Valley. He stated that the Council looked at the drainage plan as part of the previous feasibility study and some points should be made in accordance with the Wetlands Ordinance. He stated that it is unusual to drain a site directly into an existing wetland, however, that concept was approved as part of the feasibility study for several reasons. He stated that as the site is developed, the land to the west that now drains to the existing pond will be rerouted to the street and down to a major pond that the city and the developers will be constructing on city and pri- vate property to the west of the site. He stated that even though the site is developed, there will only be a minimal increase in the amount of runoff that is going to the existing wetlands. He stated that all three wetlands will be made to function as one, in that they will all be connected with one outlet control structure. He stated that the overall concept was approved with the earlier study as a way to use existing wetlands and new ponding areas to protect the existing lakes as much as possible as development occurs. He stated that Al and A3 wetlands exists as shown and the A2 wetlands will be regraded. He stated that the road realignment does include some filling in the wetlands, on A2 a slight amount and a little bit more on A3. He stated that the road going across the Ward estate is primarily for future planning purposes. He stated that there is no intent at this time to plat that road. He stated that since the road will be platted to the western edge of the Ward estate and the point on the eastern edge is pretty much established as to grades and how the road would continue to the east, there is no question that some rough alignment is being given across the Ward estate. He stated that the realignment has an impact on the Ward property, however, an attempt has been made to minimize it given the current realignment by using the cross slope for the road bed. He stated that the distance between Highway 5 and the new align- ment is approximately 300 feet and at the widest point as it sweeps farther to the south is approximately 400 feet. He stated that an attempt has been made to make sure that a parcel to the north is left which is high ground and can be developed. Michelle Foster representing the Opus Corporation stated that they are supporting the project and can answer questions as it relates to their property. She stated that they support the realignment of Lake Drive East. John Ward stated that their concern is the realignment of the road. He stated that it cuts the property which significantly affects the northwest corner of the property and he agreed that it was buildable, however, that it was limited and would take away choices without benefiting them. He asked that if there was e e tit Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 4 any way the road could be curved around the pond and brought back more in alignment with the original city proposal. He stated that the road as proposed will give limited access onto Highway 101 which would significantly affect the useage and the value of the property. Ryan asked staff if there was a letter from the Lake Susan Homeowner's Association. Dacy stated that staff did not receive anything from them. She stated that representatives were contacted but they had previous commitments for the evening. Cal Lundquist, the architect for the developers, stated that there were no soil borings taken across the original road align- ment. He stated that there were a couple of borings taken in and around it but none right along the road. He stated that when the original alignment was made, most of the road across the Sunnybrook property, as shown, and the entrance to the Ward property occurred on a very swampy area. He stated that two things occurred to him in seeing that; 1) the road interferes with the natural drainage patterns of the terrain, whereas the realignment does not intersect the drainage pattern; and 2) in constructing this road, it will be more difficult road to build as originally proposed and when it gets to the Ward property it will be more difficult to enter this area to the north of the original proposed road because of the bank conditions - slope of 20 to 25 feet. He stated that the new proposal cuts across the contours in such a manner so that the road is on the high side of the developable property and gives easy access to the north part of the Ward property and avoids the problem of building the road across a lower more difficult area. Jerome Raidt stated that he did not know if that gentleman was an expert or not, but felt that the property could be graded. He felt that the developers want to put the road there for pure aesethetics and felt they were cutting down the value of the Ward property. Conrad moved, seconded by M. Thompson, to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried. M. Thompson asked if there was any right-of-way given or taken for the proposed original alignment? Bill Monk stated that the right-of-way all the way across the Opus property to the western edge of the Ward Estate is platted. He stated that what you are looking at is a realignment of that plat which was approved about l.l12 years ago. M. Thompson asked about the maximum and minimum depth across the Ward property. e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 5 Bill Monk stated that the road is being moved a little over 300 feet to the north from its existing platted location and it leaves about the same distance from the Highway 5 right-of-way to the new platted street. M. Thompson asked someone from the Ward property wondered how the road proposal was cutting down the value of the property? Jerome Raidt stated that the property located on Highway 5, the parcel would be between the original proposal and there property is cut in half. He stated that serviceability, access, ingress- egress, the size of and type of construction. M. Thompson asked what the property was zoned, existing and pro- posed? Dacy stated that it is zoned P-4, Industrial which allows ware- house, manufacturing uses, and office. She stated that on the proposed zoning map it is intended to be lOP, Industrial Office Park use. M. Thompson asked how the different depth of the Ward property would be affected as to what they can put on the property? e Dacy stated that although staff has no detailed site plan to review, she stated that warehouse and manufacturing uses vary in size. Conrad stated that he did not see how the proposed realignment would be decreasing the value of the Ward property. He does not feel that is a valid concern. He asked the City Engineer if he felt that in regards to the wetlands, there would be a zero change? Bill Monk stated that he felt it will better the situation by creating better drainage pattern and better quality and quantity. He stated that the Watershed District concurred with him on this. Conrad asked what the standard height of buildings and if staff felt there was enough screening with the existing vegetation? Olsen stated that 35 feet is the required height within the 1,000 foot Shoreland District. She stated that the building would be able to be seen, but it is located at a distance from the lake and is partially screened by the existing vegetation. Conrad asked if the previous alignment was kept, would there be any advantages for anybody other than the Ward's? e Bill Monk stated that the road can be built at either location. He stated that since the developer is going to pay the major e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 6 share of costs for building the road it is a toss up. He stated that as far as the Ward property, there is an affect on the property to the north which effects the square footage. He stated that it becomes questionable on how much property do you need for a reasonable development and if staff felt that it was totally unreasonable we would be saying that but at this time it is questionable. Conrad asked how much frontage other parcels in the business park had? Dacy stated that at the intersection of Audubon and Highway 5, the recording studio, has approximately 500 to 600 feet. She stated that at Park Road and Highway 5, the 15,000 square foot office warehouse building, they have approximately 200 to 300 feet. e Michele Foster, Opus Corporation, stated that as a general com- ment, a 300 foot depth for an industrial lot is very acceptable. She stated that 600 feet would be far to deep for a standard industrial lot. She stated that if it were to be used as a major corporate user of some sort, it would obviously limit their flexibility some. Dacy stated that the Opus Two site is approximately 350 feet deep and the LSR site is approximately the same. Siegel had no quesions. Emmings commented that because there is no specific plan to develop the Ward property, any comments about whether this road benefits or harms it are purely speculative. He also felt that the applicant has done a great deal to accommodate all of the concerns that we have heard expressed. Ryan asked about the access to the church. Bill Monk stated that it is a condition of the plat that the access be realigned when the road is constructed. Michele Foster stated that Opus has an agreement with the church that when the new road goes in, they will make accommodations for access for them. Ryan asked if the Fire Marshal had any concerns with the height of the building? e Olsen stated that he has contacted the architect to get more detail plans on access to the rear of the building and other than that he had no comments. e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 7 Siegel moved, seconded by M. Thompson, that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan #85-6 as depicted on the site plan stamped IIReceived November 25, 198511 1. That the building permit will not be issued until a construc- tion contract for Lake Drive East is awarded. 2. That no structures are allowed below the 940 foot elevation. 3. That four additional parking spaces be added for a total of 354 parking spaces. 4. That landscaping be added to the parking lot islands. 5. That additional landscaping be added on the westerly and northerly edge of the main parking lot subject to staff approval. 6. That the applicant receive a wetlands alteration permit. 7. That the feasibility study for Lake Drive East be amended to reflect the modified street alignment and corresponding uti- lity revisions. e 8. All regulatory permits from the Watershed District and DNR be secured and all conditions made a part of this approval. ,/ 9. A detailed grading plan be submitted at time of building per- mit application showing provisions for protecting the wetlands and Lake Susan from erosion during the construction process. 10. A detailed grading plan for the gazebo and walkway be sub- mitted subject to staff and DNR approval. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Final Plan Amendment for Chaparral 4th Addition with the sub- division of 29.2 acres into 55 single family lots on property zoned P-l, Planned Residential Development and located to the east of Kerber Boulevard, L. A. Laukka, applicant. Public Present Jeff Kleiner Philip Hanson Lloyd Miller 655 Carver Beach Road 35 Nathan Lane, Plymouth 610 Carver Beach Road - Olsen stated that the applicant has submitted another revision to amend the final plan for Chaparral 4th Addition. She stated that e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 8 e the parcel is under different ownership, it is still considered part of the Chaparral PUD and must receive approval to amend the final plan. She stated that the plan proposes 55 single family lots with a gross density of 1.88 units per acre and a net den- sity of 3.36 units per acre. She stated that the average lot size is 12,967 square feet, ranging from 11,700 to 20,000 square feet. She stated that the applicant is proposing 10 foot side yard setbacks on both sides and is proposing a 25 foot front yard setback on the wooded lots to save trees and maintain the existing vegetation. She noted that staff is recommending that all of the lots have a reduced front yard setback to allow for easier enforcement. She noted that the plan proposes to direct drainage from the site into a retention basin on the eastern edge of the property. She stated that this area will allow for sedi- mentation of the runoff and will have a controlled outlet. She stated that the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the plan and has recommended that park dedication fees be accepted in lieu of park land. She stated that the Park Commission also recommended that a trail easement be designated across Outlot A which will connect the property with Meadow Green Park as indi- cated in the Comprehensive Plan. She noted that the housing designs will be varied and each unit will have a two car garage. She also noted that the applicant has indicated that restrictive covenants would be submitted to control the architectural exterior, roof pitches and location of the buildings. She stated that the applicant is proposing to maintain much of the existing vegetation and one boulevard tree per lot, which meets city stan- dards. She noted that staff is recommending the applicant install berms and additional landscaping along Kerber Boulevard to minimize traffic impact on the subdivision. Dale Beckman, from BRW, representing Dr. Schroeder and Larry Laukka, provided the Commission handouts of the various building styles. He stated that they have tried to design the cul-de-sacs such that at the building setback line, the house elevation would be at the street elevation. He stated that they will drop the elevation of the cul-de-sacs and thereby allowing each builder to customize the lot. He stated that he will be happy to answer any questions the Commissioners might have. e Lloyd Miller stated that over the years that Chaparral has been developed, he stated that a lot of mud has been going through the creek and it is having an impact on Lotus Lake, by getting shallower and muddy. He stated that this development is going to cause more problems for the lake. He thought there was a 200 foot setback from any creek and the developer was also taking about grading the soil down in the southern part. He stated that they might as well take a dump truck and dump it into Lotus Lake because that is where it is going to go. He stated that he has no objections to the development. e e e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 9 Bill Monk stated that there has been economic ban on development in the area because of the drainage improvements that would be needed. He stated that the existing three phases of the Chaparral development drain into a holding basin down in the southwest area of this site which has a controlled outlet. He stated that it drains into a creek and then follows the existing creek line directly to Lotus Lake with basicly nothing in its path. He stated that the Watershed District has said that a pipe needs to be installed or some improvements put into the creek to control that problem. He stated that what is being recommended at this point, instead of piping, is that the water be piped from this subdivision directly down to the low area shown as Outlot A. He stated that the area has existing low lands which will be regraded so that the creek will actually outlet into that low area and then release from there with an outlet control structure under an existing driveway that goes to service the Moulton property. He stated that it will allow for control in runoff from the site so that it does not have any more detriment to the creek but also will allow it to pond in such a location that some sedimentation and water quality improvement can be done. He felt that the site was tailor made for that because it exists as a low marshy area and can be made to handle the flow not only from the existing Chaparral but also from this subdivision, as well as the property that would develop to the south. He felt that this is the only way that any development can occur and water quality be improved. He stated that the final plan for that as far as sizing and outlet control would have to be approved by the city and watershed district. He stated that before any development could occur, these improvements would need to be designed and installed, because one of the conditions the watershed district would put on it without any thought would be that all drainage improvements be made and ponding areas be graded before any development. Jeff Kleiner stated that his home is backed up against the holding pond. He stated that this spring he dredged it out with a rake. He stated that the heavy rains had the creek up 8 feet into his yard and garden. He stated as it is now, the creek feeds into that holding pond and if you are going to dump more water in there, he stated that he would have to get flood insurance. Bill Monk stated that there would be a substantial amount of grading on the site to allow for the storage or volume of water to be held and that would have to be done at the same time. He stated that the holding basin will have to be reshaped and changed in terms of how much water it will hold, whether the sides will have to be raised or the basin lowered. Ryan asked who would be doing the improvements. e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 P ag e 10 Bill Monk stated that the developer would do the improvements and the city would then take over the maintenance of it. Lloyd Miller asked about the 200 foot setback from the creek. Dacy stated that the 200 foot distance is the distance that the watershed district tries to enforce for the business park. She stated that it is not part of our Wetlands Ordinance. She stated that the watershed district has not advised us of any problems with the development. She also stated that in the residential development the setback requirment has not been commented on by the watershed district. Ryan asked if staff would review the proposed Fertilizer Ordinance. e Olsen stated that the city will be initiating an ordinance that will be requiring low phosphorus fertilizer so that it will lessen the impact on lakes. She stated that there will be a setback from the lakes that it can be used, however, that has not been determined. She felt that it would be approximately 25 feet. Philip Hanson stated that the plan shows trees and wondered if the developer was going to leave the existing trees in the plan. He wanted to know if there was a guarantee to keep the existing trees. Bill Monk stated that there is no guarantee, however, as final plans and specifications are drawn up for any subdivisions, they have to submit a grading plan. He stated that the grading plan is checked with the plans that were submitted to make sure there is no misrepresentation. He stated that they also check the plan to the point where the areas shown as being grading are the areas. He stated that through that process it is checked. He stated that every attempt will be made to minimize the area disturbed. ? be saved? asked if the tree line on top of the hill would Dale Beckman stated that they will be trying to save as much of the existing vegetation as possible and they will be keeping the existing trees. M. Thompson moved, seconded by Emmings, to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried. e M. Thompson asked if the developer carries the full burden of costs for solving all of those problems? e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 11 Bill Monk stated that one of the intents is to make this economi- cally feasible for this developer to develop the property. He stated that since the bulk of the improvements need and should be done on this site, and that this is part of the Chaparral Addition, he felt that it was reasonable that the grading of the basin should be done by the developer as part of this development. M. Thompson asked if the developer agrees to that? Bill Monk stated that it is a condition of approval. e Dale Beckman stated that about a year ago, they met with the Watershed District, two developers to the south, and one developer to the east side. He stated that one of the discussions was that they would be willing to do part of the work provided that the other developers that would benefit from this would also contribute something with this. He stated that preli- minary discussions were that we would do dredging and a control structure. He stated that another option would be the 429 pro- ject where if we were not able to strike a deal with the other developers to do this, we would then as a majority property owner petition city for improvements. He stated that they are very interested in finalizing the design of which the City Engineer has had a very large part in shaping. Conrad stated that the City Council's last directive stated they wanted to see 15,000 square foot lots. He asked if that was true? Olsen stated that they wanted an average lot size of 15,000 square feet. Conrad asked what the developer has done to tell us that we don't need the 15,000. Dacy stated that there were three revisions to that plat. She stated that it was stated to the developer that they should try and approximate 15,000 square foot average size as much as possible with the smallest lot size of 11,700. She stated that the developer has chosen to submit a plan for 55 single family lots which is 8 above the previously approved plan of 47. She stated that staff believes the lot pattern is well distributed. Conrad asked about the Hidden Valley subdivision lot sizes. Dacy stated that the Hidden Valley subdivision had an average lot size of 14,900 square feet. She stated that 35% to 40% of the lots were below 10,000 square feet. e Conrad felt that there should be an average lot size of 15,000 square feet and he sees nothing to persuade him to lower that. e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 12 Dale Beckman compared the original Chaparral 4th grading plan with the now proposed plan. He stated that the original plan for the Chaparral 4th Addition located the lot lines well into the wetlands and showed a large green open space, however, after the grading, there is very little vegetation left. He stated that with our plans we are trying to protect more green area. Olsen stated that they are increasing the open space by 10% over the originally approved plan. They are preserving more of the slopes than the other plan. Conrad stated that he likes what the developer is doing with green space and what is being done for the creek but he would like to maintain the 47 single family lots. Siegel asked if the developer was going to take the respon- sibility of the improvements? Dale Beckman stated that if they cannot get the other developers to contribute to the improvements, they will petition the city through the 429 project. Siegel asked if the City Engineer could explain the 429 project. e Bill Monk stated that it has been proposed that the improvements would go in here would be most likely be publicly installed, where the city would approve the plans and specs but not be involved in the installation. He stated that if the developer cannot come to grips with the benefitting property owners, then they may come back to the city petitioning for drainage improve- ments and then other properties will be assessed as they benefit. Ryan asked what the price range of housing would be? Dale Beckman stated that for the original configuration they were looking at $80,000 to $100,000, however for the new con- figuration, they do not have range. Ryan asked about two car garages. Dale Beckman stated that there would be deed restrictions covering this. Ryan asked staff if the Commission could be assured that there would be two car garages and basements. Dacy stated that unless it is specifically stated in the motion, they could not be assured of it. e Ryan stated that he likes what he sees on this development and the average is very close to the median. e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 13 M. Thompson moved, seconded by Siegel, that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Final Plan Amendment #85-2 PUD, as depicted on the plan stamped IIReceived November 26, 198511 with the following conditions: 1. That the front yard setbacks be reduced to 25 feet for all lots. 2. That a trail easement be dedicated over Outlot A. 3. That utility and street details meet all city standards for urban type construction. 4. That silt fence be installed along the construction limits and that restabilization of graded areas take place immediately following construction. 5. Approval of a final drainage plan by the City and Watershed District. 6. Submission of deed restrictions. e 7. Submission of a landscape plan for berming and plantings along Kerber Boulevard. M. Thompson, Ryan, Siegel, and Emmings voted in favor. Conrad opposed. Motion carried. Conrad stated that he is not persuaded that 8 additional lots from the approved plan was needed. Site Plan Review for a 2,527 square foot warehouse building on property zoned P-4, Planned Industrial Development District and located on outlot B, Park One, Fortier & Associates, applicant Olsen stated that this request was tabled from the November 20, 1985 meeting so that staff could research the regulations on ser- vice stations and found no requirements that they had to be con- nected to sanitary sewer. e Bill Monk stated that he contacted several agencies and found that in talking with the PCA and health department that normally commercial service stations work off of a septic system arrange- ment and they can be made to meet all agency requirements. He stated that he is recommending the amendment to condition number 4. read, IIAll drains from the site be connected to an approved septic system or the sanitary sewer system with an in-line oil separator and flammable waste trap. Additionally, the owner pro- vide for a waste storage system for disposing of oils and other automotive fluids. II e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 14 Daryl Fortier stated that they are reducing the size of the fuel tank and will be relocating the fuel storage tank farther from the building. Emmings moved, seconded by Siegel, to recommend approval of the site plan #85-10 stamped IIReceived November 13, 198511 with the following conditions: 1. A detailed location and acceptable percolation test for the septic system must be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Details of the gas storage must be approved by the Fire Marshal. 3. No outdoor storage is allowed. 4. All drains from the site be connected to an approved septic system or the santiary sewer system with an in-line oil separator and flammable waste trap. Additionally, the owner provide for a waste storage system for disposing of oils and other automotive fluids. e 5. Final site plan for the building permit denote the septic system location, water service location and driveway layout along with septic system design details. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Sign Variance Request for an area identification sign on property zoned P-l, Planned Residential Development and located in the Near Mountain Development, Mark McDonald, applicant. Because the applicant was not present at the meeting, the Commissioners felt it necessary to table the item so that their questions could be answered. Conrad moved, seconded by Siegel, to table the request until the applicant could be present. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Approval of Minutes M. Thompson moved, seconded by Emmings, to approve the October 9, 1985 and the November 20, 1985 meeting minutes as written. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Planning Commissioner Vacancies e Olsen stated that the Commission currently has terms expiring at the end of the year. Chairman Bill Ryan and Vice-Chairman Ladd Conrad. e e e Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1985 Page 15 M. Thompson moved, seconded by Emmings, to reappoint Bill Ryan and Ladd Conrad to the Planning Commission. M. Thompson, Emmings and Siegel voted in favor. Motion carried. Olsen also stated that Mr. James Wildermuth contacted staff and wishes to be considered again for appointment. She stated that he could fill Mr. Thompson's term. She stated that no other applications have been received. The Commission instructed staff to contact past Commission appli- cants and arrange a future interview date. Meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Barbara Dacy, City Planner Prepared by Vicki Churchill January 2, 1986