1985 08 28
-
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 28, 1985
Acting Chairman Conrad called the meeting to order at 7:37 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Jim Thompson, Tom Merz, Ladd Conrad, Howard Noziska and Mike
Thompson.
MEMBERS ABSENT
Bill Ryan
STAFF PRESENT
Barbara Dacy, City Planner and Vicki Churchill, Secretary.
PUBLIC HEARING
Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Allow Churches as a
Conditional Use in the P-l, Planned Residential Districts,
Judy Siegle
Public Present
e
Judith Siegle - applicant
Nate Casteus
Carroll Hanna
411 Highland Drive
7801 Great Plains Blvd.
400 Santa Fe Trail
e
Dacy stated that the applicant represents the Family of Christ
Lutheran Church. She stated that they are proposing to construct
a church on Outlot B of the Hidden Valley Estates P.R.D. She
noted that the property is zoned P-l, Planned Residential Develop-
ment which does not permit churches. She stated that the appli-
cant is requesting the ordinance be amended to allow churches as
a conditional use. She stated that churches are currently
allowed as conditional uses in the R-l, R-la, R-2 through R-4
Districts. She noted that the R-la District requires the church
to be within the MUSA boundary. She stated that since churches
are required to go through the conditional use process in other
residential districts, staff is recommending that churches in the
P-l District should also be required to obtain a conditional use
permit. She stated that this would allow the Planning Commission
and City Council to review each proposal and determine if ade-
quate parking, landscaping, etc. is being provided. She stated
that this process will also require a public hearing to allow
for input from the surrounding residences. She noted that two
conditions of the conditional use permit should be that the
church site lie within the MUSA line and be located on a collec-
tor or arterial streets. She stated that a church is a more
intense use in a residential area because it genreates a high
amount of traffic at certain times. She stated that for this
reason, it is important that a church abut a collector or major
Planning Commission Minutes
August 28, 1985
~ Page 2
arterial so that it will not conflict with the normal traffic
flows of the adjoining residential area.
Chairman Conrad asked if the applicant had any more to add to the
staff report.
Judith Siegle stated that she wanted to clarify that the parcel
they are going to be purchasing is closer to 3~ acres.
M. Thompson moved seconded by Noziska, to close the public
hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
M. Thompson moved, seconded by Noziska, to recommend approval of
the Zoning Ordinance Amendment #85-3 to amend Section 14 as
follows by adding:
Section 14.12 Conditional Uses
1. Churches subject to the following conditions:
~
a. The church site must be served by a collector or major
arterial street.
b. The church site must be within the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area.
All voted in favor and the motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING
Conditional Use Permit for General Retail, Professional Offices,
Restaurant, and Grocery Store Uses in the former Instant Web
facility on property zoned CBD, Central Business District, 581
West 78th Street, Gary Kirt, David C. Bell Investment Co.
Public Present
Bob Vanney (Representing applicant)
Heise Vanney & Associates
~
Dacy explained that in the applicant's proposal he states that
his portion of the Chanhassen Mall is to be developed into a
retail center to contain tenant retail spaces, a 2,000 square
foot restaurant, a 10,000 square foot grocery store and a small
professional office portion to be located in the southeastern
part of the building. She stated that Phase One will include
upgrading the exterior by replacing damaged or rotted exterior
materials and finishing them to match the existing exterior. She
stated that the applicant has also stated that he will provide
the necessary site improvements as shown on the development plan.
She stated that this would include the installation of curbing
and landscaping. She noted that the second phase will include
connecting his portion of the development to the bowling center
and the proposed area now retained by the city with an interior
e
e
e
Planning Commission Minutes
August 28, 1985
Page 3
mall corridor. She noted that the applicant indicated that
leasing the tenant spaces may extend over a period of one to two
years. She stated that the city should, in the interest of
assuring that the proposed uses are suitable for this reuse acti-
vity, specify the types of uses to be located in the building and
retain the authority to review and approve or deny a use not spe-
cifically listed. She noted that the parking on the site plan
accurately depicts the approved Plan B and Plan C for the entire
site. She noted that the location of retail and office uses in
the southeast corner of Kirt's property will generate a parking
demand in this part of the lot and will spillover into Mr.
Bloomberg's property to the east. She stated that a cross ease-
ment between the applicant and Mr. Bloomberg should be achieved
assuring that access rights in the northwest corner of
Bloomberg's site is available. She stated that this agreement
would also include joint parking rights. She noted that site
improvements on Plan B indicates the areas where curb and gutters
should be installed as well as identifies on the landscaping plan
where potential vegetation should be located. She stated that
the applicant has indicated that curbing will be installed in
conformance with the previously approved plan. She stated that a
detailed landscape plan indicating proposed plantings should also
be submitted prior to installation. She noted that as in other
commercial/industrial developments, these site improvements
should be installed before occupancy of the building. She
stated that the applicant is proposing cosmetic improvements to
the front portion of the building at this time, but stated that
the applicant does not want to commit to an exterior improvement
at the present time. She stated that the applicant does intend
to upgrade the exterior when the tenant spaces are leased, espe-
cially what is proposed as the grocery store area. She stated
that the interior mall connection is to be located between the
northern wall of the bowling center and the southern wall of
Kirt's property. She stated that a twelve foot corridor has been
reserved to extend from the western portion of the building east
to the center of the building. She stated that it is difficult
to predict its alignment and function at this time without
knowing the proposed use the city owned space will have. She
stated that the applicant should enter into negotiations with the
city when consideration of the interior mall connection is made.
She also stated that the applicant indicates that one pylon sign
will be installed on the property as well as allowing indivdiual
tenants to have wall signs. She stated that signage details will
have to be sumitted in conjunction with the usually required sign
permit application.
Bob Vanney stated that the only concern the applicant had was
the exterior facade of the building having to match the bowling
center's. He stated that they did not want to be tied into an
Planning Commission Minutes
August 28, 1985
P ag e 4
e
exterior plan because the tenant space was not leased yet. He
did not want to be "locked in" to a certain plan, especially in
the area of the grocery store.
M. Thompson moved, seconded by Noziska, to close the public
hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
M. Thompson moved, seconded by Noziska to recommend approval for
Conditional Use Permit Request #85-11 based on the site develop-
ment plan and text stamped "Received August 7, 1985" and subject
to the following conditions:
1. Permitted uses in the subject area of the building are as
follows:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
e g.
h.
i .
j .
k.
l.
m.
n.
o.
Apparel sales
Grocery store
Medical clinics
Restaurant
Daycare center
Financial institutions
Home furnishings
Newspaper office
Business and general offices
Professional offices
Personal services including beauty and barber shops
Print shops
Specialty retail
Book or music stores
Any other uses to be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner
2. Installation of curbing prior to building occupancy around
the perimeter of the building, the loading area, entrances to
the public street, and the island near the east property line
as depicted on the approved Plans Band C dated April 15,
1985.
3. Submission of a detailed landscaping plan and installation
of said landscaping in conjunction with other site improve-
ments.
4. Execution of an access and joint parking cross easement with
Mr. Bloomberg.
5. Signage on site shall be limited to a free standing pylon
sign and tenant signs to be mounted on the building walls in
conformance with the regulations of the Sign Ordinance.
e
6. The applicant shall agree to enter negotiations with the city
to develop an interior mall connection.
-
-
e
Planning Commission Minutes
August 28, 1985
Page 5
7. Submission of detailed facade plans for the upgrading of the
exterior of the building to be reviewed by the City Council.
(The Planning Commission felt there was no need to review
these plans.)
All voted in favor and the motion carried.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
J. Thompson moved, seconded by Conrad to approve the August 14,
1985 meeting minutes as written. J. Thompson, Conrad and M.
Thompson voted in favor. Merz and Noziska abstained. Motion
carried.
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Barbara Dacy, City Planner
Prepared by Vicki Churchill
September 3, 1985