The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda and Packet AGENDA �...- CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1978, 7: 30 P.M. CHANHASSEN MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 7610 LAREDO DRIVE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA AWARD OF BIDS 1. 7 :30 p.m. - South Lotus Lake Drainage Improvment Project. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2 . 7 :45 p.m. - South Lake Riley Sanitary Sewer Extension Across: a. The four lots between Lake Riley Blvd. and Kiowa, and b. To include sanitary sewer on Kiowa. NOTE: The public hearing was closed on November 6, 1978, with the final decision being tabled to this meeting. 3 . 8:00 p.m. - Fill Permit Application, Property Owners Abutting Hill Street, South Lotus Lake. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. 8:15 p.m. - City Council Minutes dated November 6, 1978 . Commission minutes. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 5. Residential Building Permit Requests, Carver Beach: 8:30 p.m. - a. Jim Hauplman, Carver Beach Road & Willow. 8:45 p.m. - b. Richard Rossing, Laredo Drive & W. 68th Street. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Council Procedures allows for the presentation of items - if action is required, the item will be tabled to the next regular agenda to allow for publication and review of items prior to final consideration. APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS 6 . 9 : 00 p.m. - Bills dated November 20, 1978 . NEW BUSINESS 7 . 9 :15 p.m. - Industrial Revenue Bond Request, Roman Roos, West 78th Street, Proposed Professional Office Building. 8. 9 : 45 p.m. - Conditional Use Permit, Amateur Radio Antennae, Roy Barke, 6901 Shawnee Lane. 9 . 10: 10 p.m. - Subdivision and Variance Request, Dr. James Meyer, 6225 Ridge Road (Create Three Residential Lots) . 10 . 10:30 p.m. - Front Yard Variance Request, Larry Dahl, 822 Elm Road. 11. 10: 50 p.m. - Development Contract Amendment Chapparel (New Horizon Homes) . 12 . 11:10 p.m. - 1978 Temporary Improvement Bonds, Authorize Sale and Set Bid Opening Date. 11: 30 p.m. - Adjournment. NOTE: The following items were proposed for consideration on November 20. Given the length of the agenda, a special meeting date of November 27 will be recommended for consideration of the following items : 1. Subdivision, Site Plan Review and Variance Request for Happy Chef, Inc. and Erickson Petroleum, Inc. , Lot 1, Block 2, Frontier Development Park. 2 . Industrial Revenue Bond Request, Gedney Pickle, Plant Expansion Proposal. 3. House Moving Permit and Request to Waive Subdivision Requirements, Bill Schmid, Church and Townline Road. 4 . Hansen and Klingelhutz, Burdick Park Development Contract, Appeal of Curb and Gutter Requirement. 5. North Lake Susan Improvement Project, Authorization to Purchase Schrnieg Easement. 6. North Lotus Lake Park, Authorization to Purchase Additional Acreage (Parcel abutting existing park property) . 7 . Front Yard Variance, B.T. Land Company, Lot 31, Block 2, ELotus Lake Estates. 1 COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 8. a. Lift Station Screening - Hibbert Hill Property, Carver Beach. b. Arbor Lane Stop Sign. c. Review Election Procedures. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 9. Consent Agenda: a. Set Public Hearing date - Proposal to expand Tax Increment District (Proposed Commercial/Industrial Properites South of Highway 5 and between S.H. 101 and County Road 17) . b. Fire Department Charges for Railroad, Highway and Car fires - Establish Uniform Carver County Rate Schedule. c. Defer Connection Sewer Requiremet.t, Mary Kurvers, East Lotus Lake. WILLIAM D. Sr HOELL CARLISLE MAUSON JACK T. VtOSLER AIL JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN �LARRY L. HANSON SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY 'Mr ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS JACK E. GILL RODNEY 8. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND (612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E. ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON. TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING R. SCOTT HARRI November 17 , 1978 City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Subject: South Lotus Lake Drainage Project No. 78-1 , Tabulation of Bids, Our File No. 9702 Gentlemen: The three bids received on the subject project on November 15 , 1978 , ranged from $50 , 485 to $71 ,340 as shown on the attached Tabulation of Bids . The low bidder, G . L. Contracting and high bidder , Park Construction, based their bids on the use of riprap material different than that specified. The only valid bid (meeting specifications) , submitted by Ideal Enterprises of $57 ,805 is $12 , 805 over our most recent estimate of $45 , 000 . Design changes required by the Soil Conservation Service required upward revision of the $41 ,000 estimated cost presented at the Public Hearing. The riprap gradation for the Lot 12 work as specified by the Soil Conservation Service, is not readily available from any of the aggregate suppliers in the metropolitan area. The material would have to be specially produced and delivered at a cost of $20 . 00 per ton. Commonly used riprap , stockpiled by suppliers , will cost $10 . 00 per ton delivered. Since 1700 tons of riprap are required, use of stock material could result in a savings of $17 ,000 (1700 X $10 . 00) and lower the cost tc our original estimate. SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. City of Chanhassen November 17 , 1978 Page Two It is possible that riprap material available at lower cost could be used with channel design changes (channel slope and width changes and/or riprap depth changes) . The City Attorney informs us that since competitive bids have been taken, the City is permitted by State Statute to contract for the work by day labor. This would save the con- siderable time required to rebid the project and make comple- tion of the work in Lot 12 possible this year. We suggest that the City reject all bids and authorize us to redesign the channel as necessary to reduce costs and to seek proposals to carry out the work at day labor. Very truly yours , SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. / WJErezinsky:esg Enclosure ' TABU! ." SOUTH LOTUS LAKE DRA I! CITY OF CI SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. Engineers & Surveyors 15 1976 G. L. CC CONSTRUCTION CO. HOPKINSEAPOLIS Bid Bond 5% PART I ; LOT 12 IMPROVEMENT Channel Excavation 1080 C.Y. 3.00 00 6,480.00 Riprap 1000 C.Y. 18.00 00 28,000.00 * Filter Blanket 390 C.Y. 14.00 00 10,140.00 Clearing & Grubbing 15 Trees 200.00 00 3,300.00 Seeding 1400 S.Y. .75 75 1 ,050.00 Mulching 800 S.Y. .75 70 560.00 Hay or Straw Bale Ditch Check 30 L.F. 5.00 00 450.00 Sedimentation Delta Excavation LUMP SUM 1 ,200.00 PART II ; LOTS 21 STORM SEWER Connect Existing C.M.P. Pipes to Catch Basin 256 L.F. 30.00 00 6,400.00 Catch Basins 3 Ea. 750.00 00 2, 100.00 Riprap 4 C.Y. 35.00 00 200.00 Filter Blanket 2 C.Y. 30.00 00 50.00 Clearing & Grubbing 2 Trees 200.00 00 400.00 Surge Basin LUMP SUM 800.00 Hay or Straw Bale Ditch Check 15 L.F. 5.00 00 300.00 Seeding with Wood Fiber Blanket 700 S.Y. 2.20 20 1 ,540.00 PART III ; POND OUTLET CONTROL Outlet Control Structure LUMP SUM 6,500.00 Riprap 33 C.Y. 30.00 00 1 ,320.00 Filter Blanket 14 C.Y. 25.00 00 350.00 Seeding 100 S.Y. 1 .50 00 200.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED BID $ $71 ,340.00 * REMARKS s based on material LOW Bied by Bryan Rock Bid is basicts. Material varies -..... Supplied b'ad i at i on from what is Material fled. is specif 4 ,6 AI I LARSON 80 MERTZ Cam• ^�1`�L r ATTORNEYS AT LAW Q cJ� 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RUSSELL H.LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE CRAIG M. MERTZ (612) 335-9565 September 11, 1978 OF COUNSEL HARVEY E.SKAAR MARK C.MCCULLOUGH Donald W. Ashworth Chanhassen City Manager Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re : South Lotus Lake Drainage Project Dear Don: As I reported to your earlier, we have received the signed easements on the Hughes, Sadok and Prieditis properties for construction of the 15" CMP in the ravine which transverses these lands . With respect to Lot 12, I have secured the signatures of all property owners for the easement covering the Lot 12 work except that of Sally deLancey. I have been assured by Ted deLancey that Sally ' s signature will be obtained as soon as the necessary documentation has been mailed to her and returned to me. Therefore, I suggest that the engineer be instructed to proceed with the bidding process so that this work might possibly get underway yet thi season. ery truly y A rs RUSSELL H. LARSON Chanhassen City Attorney RHL:mep cc: Bill Brezinsky l cn ScP 1973 `f, Pzczy cv v�� c�ci, c hill A& „(17:, C ft `rU y J_ Alto }yJ LARSON & MERTZ D. '� ATTORNEYS AT LAW l� 2 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RUSSELL H.LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE CRAIG M. HERTZ (612) 335-9565 OF COUNSEL HARVEY E.SKAAR MARK C.MCCULLOUGH September 21, 1978 Donald W. Ashworth City Manager P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: South Lotus Lake Drainage Project (Easements) Dear Don, This is to advise you that all easements for this project have now been obtained and are in the process of being recorded in the County offices . Very truly yours, 134544041.(biACVL, RUSSELL H. LARSON Chanhassen City Attorney R 410 cc : Bill Brezinsky (Dictated, but not read. ) 24 EP 1973 cp� co c of -Jr+ 1Ngg N. �. CITY- OF - CHANHASSEN • 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: Russell Larson, Bill Brezinsky FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth DATE: September 6, 1978 SUBJ: South Lotus Lake Drainage Improvement Project Please insure that your activities regarding obtaining easements and advertisement for bids are coordinated to insure that such signed easements are available to the city council, as approved, on or before the date of city council action regarding award of bids. L^ A 3 CITYOF -111v' CllANBASSEN „., , 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147.CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 s (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth SUBJ: South Lotus Lake Drainage Improvement Project On June 12th the city council ordered the public hearing for this improvement project including two proposed assessment areas : 1) . Those areas contributing waters to the Hughes drainage swale off Frontier Trail, to the lot 12 property off Frontier Trail and to the drainage pond constructed as a part of the Erie, Chan View and West 77th Street Improvement Project; and 2) . Those properties contributing waters to the Western Hills Pond. Attached please find a summarized feasibility study dated April 17, 1978, as prepared by the City Engineer ( maps will be available on Monday evening) . Similar to the frontage road improvement project off Highway 5, the engineer will present the feasibility study with this office reviewing the special assessment policies which have previously been used by the council (see attached copy of letter sent to property owners concerning the project, previous city council policy for storm sewer assessments, and estimated assessment rates) . It is recommended that the city council close the public comment portion of the hearing this evening, requesting that written comments be forwarded to the city no later than July 31, 1978, with a final council decision proposed for August 7th. � 1 • WILLIAM D.SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T.VOSLER JAMES R.ORR HAROLD E.DAHLIN e, r4. LARRY L.HANSON SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. RAYMOND J.JACKSON ' WILLIAM J.BREZINSKY ENGINEERS ANO SURVEYORS JACK E.GILL ROONEY B. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND I612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E.ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON. TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING April 17, 1978 City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Administrator P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Subject: Drainage Improvement Project - Lot 12, Hughes Drainageway and Western Hills Pond, - Our File No. 9702. • Gentlemen: Enclosed are Plans and Specifications for the subject project. The project includes : A) Channel improvement of the Lot 12 Drainageway; B) Construction of a storm sewer through the Hughes Drainage- way ; C) Construction of a sedimentation pond (on Erie Avenue Project) ; D) Construction of an outlet control structure for the Western Hills pond. For assessment purposes, we suggest combination of the Lot 12 and Hughes Drainageway Improvement with the Erie Avenue Sedimenta- tion Pond (under separate contract) . The total assessable cost for this work would be $31, 234 as itemized in the Appendix to this report . The assessed cost per acre would be $280. 00. Individual assessments would be $64. 00 for each 10, 000 square feet of lot area tributary to the improvements. The Western Hills Outlet Structure would cost a net of $2 ,965 after the Soil Conservation Service Grant . Assessed on an area basis against the 72. 2 tributary acres, the cost per acre would be $41. 00. We feel that we have sufficient information to conduct a Public Hearing for this project . Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. 14)47. geera-44t7 WJBrezinsky:bk attachment SCHOELL Si. MADSON,INc. April 17, 1978 APPENDIX ESTIMATED COSTS DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 78-1 PART A - Lot 12 - Auditor' s Subdivision No. 2 : Channel Excavation 1, 200 C.Y. @ $ 2. 50/C.Y. $ 3,000 Type A, Rip-Rap 660 C.Y. @ $ 28.00/C.Y. 18,480 Type 1 , Filter Blanket 520 Tons @ $ 5.00/Ton 2, 600 Clearing and Grubbing 15 Trees @ $ 100. 00/Tree 1 , 500 Seeding .4 Ac. @ $1, 500. 00/Ac. 600 Wood Fiber Blanket 200 S .Y. @ $ 1 .00/S.Y. 200 Remove Sedimentation Delta Lump Sum 1 , 000 Ditch Check 40 L.F. @ $ 3. 00/L.F. 120 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $27,500 PART B - Lot 21 , Auditor' s Subdivision No. 2: Catch Basins 3 Ea. @ $ 700.00/Ea. $ 2, 100 Connect Existing CMP to CBI Lump Sum 400 15" CMP Storm Sewer 271 L. F. @ $ 20.00/L.F. 5,420 Surge Basin 1 Ea. @ $1, 000. 00/Ea. 1 ,000 Type A, Rip-Rap 2 C.Y. @ $ 30. 00/C.Y. 60 Filter Blanket , Type 1 1 Ton @ $ 6. 00/Ton 6 Clearing and Grubbing 2 Trees @ $ 100. 00/Tree 200 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 9, 186 PART C - Erie Avenue Sedimentation Pond: Excavation 650 C.Y. @ $ 1. 75/C.Y. $ 1, 138 Outlet Structure Lump Sum 310 Sodding 1, 200 S.Y. @ $ 1 . 00/S .Y. 1, 200 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 2, 648 Appendix - 1 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. �.- TOTAL COSTS AND ASSESSMENTS - Parts A, B and C: Construction Cost - Part A $27, 500 Part B 9, 186 Part C 2, 648 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $39, 334 Feasibility Study, Plans, Specifications, Staking and Inspection 6 , 000 SUB-TOTAL $45, 334 Legal , Administrative, Easements and Contingencies 8, 500 SUB-TOTAL $53,834 Less Watershed District Grant 3, 300 Less Soil Conservation Service Grant 19, 300 TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST $31 , 234 Assessed Area 4, 841, 990 S.F. = 111 . 16 Ac. Assessment/Acre = $280. 00/Ac. or = $ 0. 0064/S. F. Lot Size (S .F. ) Cost 10, 000 $ 64.00 12,000 76.80 14, 000 89. 60 16,000 102. 40 18,000 115. 20 20,000 128. 00 PART D - Western Hills Outlet Structure : Outlet Structure $ 3, 750 Type A, Rip-Rap 25 C.Y. @ $ 30. 00/C.Y. 750 Type 1, Filter Blanket 20 Tons @ $ 6. 50/Ton 130 Sodding 180 S.Y. @ $ 1 .50/S .Y. 270 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 4,900 Engineering, Staking and Inspection 490 SUB-TOTAL $ 5, 390 Legal, Administrative and Contingencies 539 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 5, 929 Less 50 percent Soil Conservation Service Grant $ 2 , 964 ASSESSABLE COST $ 2,965 Appendix - 2 • CITY o f . . 1 CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 Dear Property Owner: On July 24 , 1978, the City Council will be considering public comments concerning proposed improvements to various drainage ways on Lotus Lake (see attached "Notice of Public Hearing") . Should the Council determine that these improvements are necessary, improvements will be completed and costs assessed against benefitted properties. Background In the Fall of 1977, the City received a petition to repair and permanently improve two drainage courses leading to Lotus Lake. In the City Engineer' s feasibility study, he notes that increased run off from developing areas, termination of storm sewers prior to entrance to the lake, and the lack of settling ponds, has created severe erosion to these drainage ways and has caused sedimentation and deltas to occur in the lake. Additionally, the feasibility study recommended that a control structure be built at Western Hills Pond and that ponding improvements considered as a part of the Erie, Chan i View and West 77th Street Improvement Project be incorporated into the overall drainage improvement project. The Engineer' s report was accepted in September of 1977 with establish- • ment of a public hearing date being tabled to determine costs of easement acquisition and the feasibility of Federal/State grants or aids. In March of 1978, the City received notice from the Soil Conservation Office that they had approved a grant application approximating 50% of the total project cost. Easements for the project have been donated to the City. (These easements are yet to be signed although we expect no problem) . Storm Sewer Assessment Policy The City has established a storm sewer assessment policy. Basically, all project costs, including construction costs , legal, engineering, easement acquisition, etc. , are divided by the area contributing waters to the drainage area. Additionally, all properties of a commercial, industrial, or multi-family usage (not used or proposed to be used for single family purposes) are assessed at a two to one ratio. The result of these computations is a square foot assessment for single family residential , multi-family, commercial and industrial uses. Again, overall project costs are anticipated to be lower for 4 the project due to grant monies. Page 2 I ' ,A map showing the drainage improvement areas and the properties contributing run off to these areas has been enclosed. I � Based on estimates from the engineer, the following square foot assessments are anticipated should the City Council determine to order this as a public improvement project: Drainage Area #1 Average Assmt. Square Foot for 15,000 Sq. Estimated Sq. Ft. Assmt. Assessment Foot Lot 1. Single Family Residential $. 00645 $96.75 Property. 2. Non-Single Family Property $. 01290 $193 . 50 Drainage Area #2 Average Assmt. Square Foot for 15,000 Sq. Estimated Sq. Ft. Assmt. Assessment Foot Lot 1. Single Family Residential $. 00094 $14. 10 Property. 2. Non-Single Family Property $. 00188 $28. 20 Certification of Assessment Policy After completion of the project and when project costs have been calculated by the City Council, the City Council will notify all owners proposed to be assessed for the improvement costs . Prior to the public hearing, the engineer will have prepared a tabulation of project costs, less available grant monies, and the actual square foot assessment rate. Additionally, the engineer will have prepared a tabulation of all properties, owners, and the proposed assessment against each lot or parcel within the improvement area. After the public hearing and making of any corrections, the council will certify for collection and payment on the following and/or future years property tax statements, the full or yearly principal amount of the assessment against each lot or parcel together with an interest charge. The interest rate to be paid is established by City Policy, i.e. the City will sell bonds for the proposed improvements with the interest rate charged being approximately 1% higher than the net rate being paid by the City. State law allows property owners to pay all or a portion of the assessment without interest penalty, if paid within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll following the public hearing. You will receive notice of this meeting. The project engineer, Bill Brezinsky of Schoell & Madson, will present detailed plans of improvements to be completed, costs, lots proposed to be assessed, etc. on July 24 , 1978. Should you desire additional information in advance of this meeting, please feel free to contact City Hall , 474-8885. e y .. / ... ........�.� -wr \ :1(----MtkVitt, '--,__ ci L[rc • -I- 1,1-' 4, ,\_"7 c 'alp 0, •,‘ -11440° . ., \--N____-•.: \ i— .,_. .. ii,spw...A.1 t... ----- A, - .1 ', wr iMi ; • 1 -k7v1ti cs Ic (1 Atbd.A1041; 0 , C_4041Tik , , ,t, \DRAIAGE .. " 7_ A �1 j� 1� NO ASS ' '-:L�j T � �� LAKE ��,AREA P.- - ,�.•NO, ez- t.,,.,wilkwa �'� \ w .,,,,„„Allgs rimi0e ti landurzarman` F� ._ �� , A RED\or zuvAlp'... .st. 0 p i I 0 A' Fi'sitiy. 00. - /FL ' \ \ME -4 •0 .gr . 97- : 11101? 010 a ir Ili a &„...rielleg in F- reit. ; lirtanoletriAil: :: E szlr tam NM .s� 1115TAmiumamini .Q 0lip • 1 J • MO • I tr:"" (� �. CHAN re tail ��J1 -mi 11111P ✓ COUNTY ROAD NO. 16 WEST lB- ST f j Mil lir "'� \--Li. ..j.,,.. ••• NE / P 0 ti dr o \' lioi ow �O•0 4 Pids I1P sr „„ „,„ PACE r �If R" STAtE HIGHWA'� L+e ., �, II� 1 wS LARSON & MEii•ri ATTORNEYS AT LAW I900 FIRST NATIONAL RANK eel LOING RUSSELL H. LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE CRAIG M. MERTZ 16121 335-9565 OF COUNSEL September 11, 1978 HARVEY E.SKAAR MARK C.MCCULLOUGH William J . Brezinsky Schoell & Madson, Inc. 50 Ninth Avenue South Hopkins, MN 55343 Re : Hughes/Prieditis/Sadok easements So. Lotus Lake Drainage Project Dear Bill: Mike Hughes has expressed to me his considerable concern about the possibility of irreparable damage to the rather extensive wildflower beds and heavily wooded ravine by reason of the planned construction in the area . After viewing the site, I share his concern, and join with him in requesting that you and the contractor first meet with Mike before any equipment is moved into the area or work performed. He will show you the exact areas which should be preserved and remain undisturbed . Very truly yours, RUSSELL H . LARSON Chanhassen City Attorney RHL:mep cc: Mike Hughes Donald W. Ashworth o CITY CIF - 0 CHANHASSEN if 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 ro i MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth DATE: November 20, 1978 SUBJ: South Lake Riley Sanitary Sewer Extension Across: a. The four lots between Lake Riley Blvd. & Kiowa, and b. To include sanitary sewer on Kiowa The City Council closed the public hearing for this project on November 6, 1978, tabling action on this item to this meeting, to consider comments made at the public hearing and to receive additional written testimony. Attached, please find a copy of the transcript of the public hearing. Also attached is a copy of a petition received from the Pemrick' s, Heille' s and Dockendorf ' s, favoring alternate B. To the best of staff ' s knowledge, the Pemrick' s are the only property owners in the probable improvement project needing sanitary sewer service this fall. If, as anticipated, property owners along Kiowa would have strongly objected to the proposed project, the sanitary sewer could have been installed across the four lots lying between Lake Riley Blvd. and Kiowa yet this Fall. Given the number of owners favoring sanitary sewer extension on Kiowa, easement negotiations for all owners, complete plans and specifications, formal bids , etc. will delay construction to the Spring of 1979 (completion in Summer, 1979) if the project is authorized to include properties on Kiowa. Should the City Council act to order the public improvement project to include both the four lots between Kiowa and Lake Riley Blvd. as well as Kiowa, the contract to complete this work could be broken into two parts: 1) the first 150 feet to be completed by informal bids, and 2) the remainder of the project under the formal bidding procedures. If this alternative were chosen, easement acquisition would be required for both the Heille' s and Pemrick properties with the Pemrick' s agreeing to pay any additional costs of the informal bidding contract over and above the unit costs of the entire project. As of the date of writing this report, the Heille' s and Pemrick' s would be agreeable to these requirements. Mayor and Council -2- November 20, 1978 Should the City Council authorize alternative B as a public improvement project, staff would recommend that: 1) . The engineer be authorized to prepare detailed plans and specifications for the project. 2) . The city attorney' s office be authorized to begin easement acquisition for the project. 3) . That the engineer be authorized to take informal bids to accomplish construction of sanitary sewer across the Heille and Pemrick properties conditioned upon a) the Heille' s and Pemrick' s both donating the easement to the City, and b) < that the Pemrick' s agree to pay any additional costs of the construction across the Heille and Pemrick property over and above the unit costs of the larger project when formally bid. REGULAR CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1978 Mayor Hobbs called the meeting to order at 7 :00 p.m. with the following members present : Councilmen Pearson and Neveaux. Councilman Waritz came • late. Councilman Geving was absent . The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilman Neveaux moved to approve the agenda with the addition of Diseased Tree Program. Motion seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Neveaux and Pearson. No negative votes . Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING • SOUTH LAKE RILEY SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION Mayor Hobbs called the hearing to order at 7 : 10 p .m. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the extension of sanitary sewer across ; a) the four lots between Lake Riley Blvd. and Kiowa, or b) to include sanitary sewer on Kiowa. The City Engineer presented the feasibility study for the two project. His estimate reflected a total cost of $8 ,494 for alternate A or a cost per home of $3, 085 . The total cost of alternate B was estimated at $51,511 or $3,823 per home. The difference between the two alternatives is the additional costs of street restoration. Councilman Waritz came at 7 : 15 p .m. The hearing was opened for convents from persons present. John Bell - Did you look at the feasibility of running right down along the lakeshore all the way through and getting easements across as an alternative? Bill Brezinsky - Yes, we did. The problem is that if you run along the lakeshore you serve the lots along the lake you also have to have a line along the road. You are looking at almost double the length. The other alternative was if you ran along the lake and ran some sort of services up to these lots over here or manholes and we did look at that and the cost was more. John Bell - Under alternative B did you include, do you spread the cost of the road against those other four lots in alternative A? Bill Brezinsky - No, we didn't. It is the city policy to assess the abutting properties for the streets that they front on. Kathy Dockendorf - We are the second lot in on those four . Why couldn't 1 the road come back in to Pemrick' s? They would be the last house on Kiowa Trail . Bill Brezinsky - That ' s a possibility. It could be looked into as part of this project. The' city does not have the right to go in there and put in a public road right now. If these property owners would get together and dedicate that property for the right-of-way to the city, the city would probably consider extending the road to serve those properties . The cost of that would be ` assessed back. Ron Setter - A year ago when we talked about the Lake Riley Blvd. sewer being put in there was some comments about dry water pipes being put in, I would like to know where we are with that and why it hasn't been figured into this cost . Bill Brezinsky - When the road was restored this time we would be restoring it to about a 20 foot width which is existing. When the • Council Meeting November 6, 1978 -2- • water pipe goes in in the future the road would be widened to a 28 foot city standard street . To answer ` your question as far as why we haven't considered putting the dry water pipes in, in this feasibility study is, we did consider that on the Shore Acres Subdivision and they were not installed there so that 's one more gap between you and the existing water on Highway 5. Before water service is available to either of these areas it has to come down from Chanhassen Estates area down to Shore Acres which will require some development in between there and then it would have to go through Shore Acres which would require a public hearing so it looks like, I would say it' s at least five years off right now. Jo King - Could you possibly define a unit and tell us upon on fact that you use to base those units? Bill Brezinsky - We counted the units as basically an existing platted lot or the unplatted metes and bounds described lots that we consider buildable. Mayor Hobbs - All we are showing you here is a sketch of which way the sewer would flow, a tentative place for the manholes, these are not the plans and specifications . John Bell - Over what period of time are these charges to the paid? Mayor Hobbs - That would be determined at the time of the assessment hearing. Normally we have been looking at a 15 year assessment. John Bell - What kind of interest rate? Mayor Hobbs - That depends on what the bond sale would go for. John Bell - What did the last one go for? Mayor Hobbs - The interest rate was 7%. Mayor Hobbs - As most of you realize this whole area down around Lake Riley is not involved in any comprehensive plans that the city has for sewer, water and street improvement. The Shore Acres project was done because of a majority petition of the homeowners . At the time we held a public hearing we included your area and a majority did not want it. Because of the uniqueness of this type of a public improvement project the Council elected at that time to stop the project where we did. I think had it been in the north area we would have finished it. Since we have completed the Shore Acres the property owners have come in and again requested that we take a look at sanitary sewer so we are now asking you people if you want us to take a look at it to go further on in. The costs do continue to go up. At some point in time the sewer will go through. The question that we have tonight is how many of you are in favor or how many of you still don't want it. Fran Heille - We did not request and we are one of the four. Mayor Hobbs - The public hearing is here for you to express your opinions and the one thing we haven't heard are opinions on whether you want the project or you don't . John Bell - Go ahead with it. Ron Setter - Is there any sly things happening back in a corner about these roads being tied through with this plan that you are . Council Meeting November 6, 1978 -3- E • presenting to us right now with this feasibility study? Last year we talked about it and I guess some how convinced we did not want the roads tied through. We still do not ~' want them tied through. Bill Brezinsky - Absolutely not . Unless we present it here this can't happen. Ron Setter - The only other question I've got is when you get a definite area where the manholes are going I would like to know because one of them is on our beach. Other than that we are for it . Sam Suhl - We are one of the newer residents out in the area. When we moved into our house in 1975 or 1976 I know in checking with City Hall we were told that city water and city sewer would probably be in the area of ten years away, for this reason basically I am opposed to the plan. Robert McCart - We just built a home a couple years ago and I am opposed to it. Mrs . Peter Pemrick - We are in favor of the plan. Peter Pemrick - Mainly because we are building now and we have to make a decision to put a septic system in or city sewer. Lee Mosman - I am for the project . Mrs . John Heille - If we go for alternate B we would vote yes . If it' s alternate A only we would vote no . Mrs. Ted Dockendorf - No for alternate A. Yes for alternate B. Susan Luker - No. Barry Bershow - Yes . Arthur Bandimere - Undecided. What I am interested in, if this goes up there, I came up twice this summer, I was thinking of finishing that proposed plat that we had there or maybe sell it, I was wondering if this went through, if that was developed up there would that connect those same lines? Bill Brezinsky - You would have to run another line. The system would take considerably more. Councilman Neveaux moved to close the public hearing and that the record be held open until the next Council meeting to receive written conuuients . Motion seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes . Hearing closed at 8 :10 p.m. 1 AWARD OF BIDS - CHASKA ROAD WATERMAIN PROJECT 78-7 : Five bids were received on this project with the low bid from Burschville Construction 1 Company of Loretto in the amount of $8 ,438.00. RESOLUTION #78-64: Councilman Neveaux moved the adoption of a resolution accepting the low bid of Burschville Construction Company for. the Chaska Road Watermain Project 78-7 in the amount of $8,438.00. Resolution seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes . Motion carried. IMINUTES : Arbor Lane stop sign and lift station screening, Hibbert Hill will be on the next Council agenda. Councilman Pearson moved to approve the October 16 , 1978 , Council minutes . Motion seconded by Councilman Neveaux. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson and Neveaux. Councilman Waritz abstained. 1 Motion carried. November 10, 1978 City Council Chanhassen, Minn. We, the undersigned, are in favor of extending the city sewer according to Plan A am. Plan B of the proposed Lake Riley Sewer Extension Improvement Project No. 78-8. (12/7. (1 17/1,i) i- 5• //ko / -C :` , /L: )"7 , 4-k 4L '.,cam 1 f. • • 46. NOV 19 8 ° RECEIVED VILLAGE oR `y '�- cHANHAss�N, L , MINT& '�S 1,1 WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON n lid JACK T. VOSLER _-' i ii, JAMES R. ORR Wi. i'f; HAROLD E. DAHLIN ' .` ` \, LARRY L. HANSON =' - `"°`'''' SCHOELL 81. MAOSON, INC. RAYMOND J. JACKSON s "`^ ."" WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS JACK E. GILL V = RODNEY B. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA IJOHN W. EMOND (612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E. ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING R. SCOTT HARRI t r • iii 1111 November 1, 1978 11 City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth II P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 I Subject : South Lake Riley - Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Study Our File No. 10228 ro Gentlemen: Herewith is the feasibility study for extension of Municipal Sanitary Sewer to serve the developed area on Lake Riley west and south of Shore Acres Subdivision. This study was authorized by the City Council on October II16, 1978. We hope this report will assist the Council in con- sideration of the problems and benefits of providing Ullmunicipal sewer service to the South Lake Riley area. Very truly yours, allSCHOELL & MADSON, INC. 6 078_, ilyii_f.4,127 WJBrezinsky :esg • II enclosure II FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO SOUTH LAKE RILEY AREA L CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan. ENGINEERSSCHOEL L & MADSON, INC. specification,certify or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision & SURVEYORS and that 1 am a duly registered . 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH Professional Enginee► under HOPKINS, MINNESOTA the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date //��' Reg.No. NOVEMBER, 1978 4 t CONCLUSIONS : III Extension of municipal sanitary sewer to serve the four Id 11 100 foot lots lying between the Plats of Shore Acres and Bandimere Heights is feasible from an engineering point of I view. Further extensions of this system to serve Bandimere Heights and Bandimere Heights 2nd Addition is likewise feasible. ill The trunk sanitary sewer system servicing this area is now operational . This system, shown on Drawing No. 10288-1 in- 11 cludes : two lift stations and force mains in Shore Acres; the , Lakeview Hills Trunk Sewer; Lake Ann Interceptor, Phase I ; and Ilithe MWCC Lift Station and downstream facilities. The cost of Ili this existing system must be shared by the homeowners in south Lake RileyArea. The costs of this service per single family i equivalent units are : i ll ITEM COST/UNIT Lakeview Hills Trunk $ 102 Ill Shore Acres Trunk $ 859 fSub-Total $ 961 (Assessed) MWCC Facilities $ 400 111 The first two items are City charges that would be assessed 11 against properties for a period of time and at an interest rate determined by the City Council after an assessment Public Hearing. The MWCC Service Availability (SAC) charge is collec- }i,, ted by the City when the connection permit is taken out and f forwarded to the MWCC. ti Additional facilities required to serve the south Lake 1 Riley Area are shown on Drawing No. 10288-2. I The estimated cost of new facilities to serve only the ` four 100 foot lots west of Shore Acres (Alternate A) is $8494 as itemized in the appendix of this report . This cost spread a 111 1 II 4--"P'CHA ll MtiY 1IIIIII ■ PO NOL . Tj ''---7-- - atittillill 1101 .,, , /- _ ,. ..: !III: 7011011, .._; amp stip* op up .„04116 mho Alma a r NIT; E' N . 1 ® t �, /� Z 1.0A3N. FOND Is�1 ,• . li C /'S'•TFONi/ f// cr .—_ �� f /7 \~ � _�—��\ LAKE ANN It*ERCEPTOR-PHASE iit 1 POND r / t • `1 L A K E S U S A N 1.011 ,//;. � � ,.- RICE MARSH L KE I • `Pi .., • I.AKEVIEvr HILLS . / I - # 41." • TRUNK SEWER _ 3 ' 1 86TH STREET I •r �!� . ' • _ CONNECT TO EXISTING • .� • 8; GRAVITI SEWER > .44-_ 61 Y y ' I E : fIL 0 • P0140 li ` ` _li • III 1 • ~� V v• E VAR O u • • _ PROPOSED 1----SIOVL " ` 1 �� , r T STATION J )1 .. ...: .._._ j •=t_____.___ - f . a 8"GRAVITY SEWER CITY OF CHANHASSEN • SERVICE AR A BOUNDARY CONNECTION MINNESOTA •1 IQF� I FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SANITARY SEWER RO-•SED ►- / L A K E SERVE SOUTH LAKE RILEY gar � 1�NITO � TRUNK SEWER jj�� 4" FORCEMAIN --0EXISTING GRAVITY SEWER !i i - \�� . -EXISTING FORCEMAIN * la t- / —EXISTING GRAVITY TRUNK SEWER lir � '/ �: ..•t_/ R ILEY QO EXISTING LIFT STATION al SCHOELL & MADSON INC. �' ' ENGINEERS a SURVEYORS • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 � �� - No. 10288-1 SCALE: I" : 1000' - DATE NOV1197✓3,_ 4 IIA11 I I it II I1 NiI EXIST. / .,, B 0 L.S.el r • I - ...` J . / � %r `. / . A . . .. s'�=" •' • CONNECT .;'• ..gl. TO EXIST. SAN. SEWER 1 4 p a, . ,. ), ,.,- , , , -, , . . ,- : I . __ �i'. I .- $ i - •-•,._. --i., s ' I 0.: t , . 4 J I1'. i , a • L..- . .. ;;., , . ..Z.. _ i . i^.' 4 .....• .1 i .".. , 'sk - • . .,o.s ,11 . /- 45"911')' f . . .... . .._ . . — —' — — 'i /Y! ,`= Co ' L. -J J ' -a..�ra•�r�.i Yar+•�•.a. - .-..,.uM+[�y�- -.7., . , • . 4111.1b•ma04"1".11111/ , ,..-----".-- -- 1 ....... \ v.-_,6,..- - . .i.-.-q,-.., ..„--,....-. • ' T % ' CITY OF CHANHASSEN `� '!, MINNESOTA i ✓. , _ FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SANITARY I SEWER TO SERVE SO. LAKE RILEY AREA P z • LATERAL SEWER r- C}.-••••--{1 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER •,4 . . .. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER 'Q SERVICE AREA SCHOELL 81 MADSON INC. ` • SCALE: IH=200' DRWG. NO. 10228-2 j i . 3- I on a unit basis would result in a lateral sewer cost per unit of $2124 . Adding the $961 cost of the existing facilities, a total cost per unit of $3085 results. Alternate B would include extension of sewer service to Bandimere Heights and Bandimere Heights 2nd Addition in addition to Alternate A, the total estimated cost of these additional facilities is $51511 . The lateral unit cost would be $2862 and R the total unit cost $3823. The higher unit cost of service to this area is a result of the relatively large lot frontages. r Sanitary sewer service to Bandimere Heights would require removal and restoration of existing gravel streets. This esti- mated $12650 cost spread against abutting lots would result in a unit cost of $703. If sealcoat street restoration is desired the total cost and cost per unit would be $16919 and $940 re- spectively. We have added 10 percent to the unit prices of recently bid projects for cost estimating purposes . This assumes con- IIII struction in 1979. The estimated costs include normal easement costs (i . e. the cost of describing easements and acquisition at value) . SERVICE AREAS AND UNITS SERVED The service area studied includes four platted lots bet- ween Shore Acres and Bandimere Heights Subdivisions, and all PI property abutting Kiowa Trail as shown on Drawing 10288-2 . In estimating costs the service area was further divided into i areas A and B as indicated. Because of the differing develop- 1 ment patterns in the two areas, this division appears reason- able. ll We recommend that the costs be spread on a unit basis rI with one unit charged to each buildable parcel . There are ill 2 i I 1 , four (4) such units in Area A and eighteen (18) in Area B. 1 l SANITARY SEWER The trunk sanitary sewer system serving the project area is operational . Sewage from the area would: flow by gravity to a lift station in south Shore Acres, through a force main- gravity system to a second lift station, through a force main through the Lakeview Hills Trunk to the Lake Ann Interceptor and MWCC System. This area will be charged its proportional Ishare of the cost of these facilities when lateral service be- comes available. The units costs have been calculated as follows: 1 System Total Cost Units Served Cost/Unit 1 Shore Acres Trunk $ 92, 817 108 $ 859 Lakeview Hills Trunk 80, 101 785 102 Trunk Assessment/Unit $ 961 1 The sanitary sewer proposed on this project will benefit only the outlined service area. In addition to the 8-inch sewer abutting the properties, 6-inch service lines would be extended to the property line . Restoration of the area to a condition equal to or better than that existing prior to con- struction, would be a part of the contract . Cost calculations are shown in the Appendix to this report . 1 STREET RESTORATION The existing gravel streets could be restored after in- stallation of sanitary sewer. However, we recommend applica- tion of a bituminous sealcoat surface for maintenance purposes and to eliminate dust problems. Because watermain will not be installed, construction of a 7-ton capacity bituminous street is not recommended. 1 F 3 The existing street width of 20 feet would be maintained. Widening to the 28-foot City standard would be done in con- junction with watermain installation. Vertical and/or horizontal alignment changes are not re- fcommended at this time. Minor changes, requested by owners, �I I � could be accomplished during construction without additional cost . • I ! I-A 4 November, 1978 TABULATION OF ESTIMATED COSTS SOUTH LAKE RILEY AREA PROPOSAL A SERVICE TO FOUR LOTS ONLY SANITARY SEWER: 8" Gravity Sewer 0' -8 ' Depth 320 L.F. @ $10. 00/L. F. $3200 Manholes to 10 ' Depth 2 Ea. @ 800. 00/Ea. 1600 Binder Rock 70 Tons @ 6.00/Ton 420 Service Conn. 4 Ea. @ 50. 00/Ea. 200 6" Service Line 40 L.F @ 8. 00/L.F 320 Sodding 650 S.Y. @ 1. 50/S.Y. 975 Total Estimated Construction Costs $6715 Add 15% Engineer & Contingencies 1007 Sub-total $7722 Add 10% Legal, Administrative and Contingencies $ 772 Total Estimated Cost New Facilities $8494 Estimated Cost/Unit = $8494/4 = $ 2124 City Trunk Cost/Unit = 961 Total Cost/Unit $ 3085 { Appendix - 1 • November, 1978 PROPOSAL B BANDIMERE HEIGHTS AREA SANITARY SEWER: 8" Gravity Sewer 0-8 480 L.F. @ $ 9. 00/L. F $ 4320 8-10 200 L.F. @ 10. 00/L.F 2000 10-12 400 L.F. @ 11. 00/L.F 4400 12-14 200 L.F. @ 12. 00/L.F 2400 14-16 200 L. F. @ 14. 00/L. F 2800 16-18 100 L.F. @ 16.00/L.F 1600 18-20 100 L. F. @ 18.00/L.F 1800 ii 20-22 100 L.F. @ 20. 00/L. F 2000 Manholes to 10' Depth 8 Ea. @ 700. 00/Ea. 5600 Manholes, Extra Depth 20 L.F. @ 60. 00/L. F 1200 Binder Rock• 200 Tons @ 6.00/Ton 1200 Service Connection 18 Ea. @ 50. 00/Ea. 900 6" Service Line 500 L.F. @ 8. 00/L.F 4000 Sodding 3600 S.Y. @ 1. 50/S.Y 5400 Bit. Driveway Rest. 150 S.Y. @ 4. 00/S.Y 600 Driveway Rock 100 Tons @ 5.00/Ton 500 Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 40720 Add 15% Engineering & Contingencies 6108 Sub Total $ 46828 it Add 10% Legal & Administrative 4683 Total Estimated Cost $ 51511 Estimated Cost/Unit = $51511/18 = $ 2862 } City Trunk Cost/Unit = 961 Total Cost/Unit = $ 3823 . it Appendix - 2 November, 1978 PROPOSAL B STREET RESTORATION: Gravel Mod. Cl. 5 Gravel 2000 Tons @ $ 5. 00/Ton = $ 10000 Street Add 15% Engineering & Contingencies 1500 Sub Total = $ 11500 Add 10% Legal & Administrative = 1150 Total Cost Gravel Street Restoration = $ 12650 Estimated Cost/Unit = $ 12650/18 = $ 703 Sealcoat Sealcoat 4500 S.Y @ $ 0. 75/S.Y = $ 3375 Street Add 15% Engineering & Contingencies 506 Sub Total $ 3881 Add 10% Legal & Administrative 388 Total Additional Cost $ 4269 Add Cost of Gravel 12650 Total Cost Sealcoat Street Restoration $ 16919 Estimated Cost/Unit = $16919/18 = $940 Appendix-3 October 27, 1978 Mr. Don Ashworth City Manager City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Subject: Lake Riley Sewer Project 77-2 Dear Mr. Ashworth: With reference to Lake Riley Project 77-2, we would like to bring the following to your attention: 1. Around this time last year, there were many times when Lake Riley Blvd. was dug up to the point where cars could not get through. This sometimes lasted for periods of 6 to 8 hours and many times people were not warned they would not be able to get out. Consequently, many of our neighbors found it necessary to come down to the dead end of Lake Riley, drive up around the side of our house, and go out by way of Kiowa Trail. As a result of the constant traffic for a period of about two weeks, and during the Fall rain, considerable damage was done to our yard. I am speaking specifically of some deep ruts along the side of the house. We brought this to the attention of the men on the sewer project and they assured us our yard would be repaired. However, this has not been done. 2. The sewer line ends approximately 10 feet into our property. When digging in our yard, it was necessary for the men to dig up an apple tree. This was a 7 ft. tree, purchased from Hallo Nursery for $25.00, and had been in the ground for a year and a half. I think the value now would be $40 or $50.00. At the time the tree was moved, the men said, "Don't worry about it. If it dies, we' ll replace it." Well . . . it died, and we're worried! 3. As the result of one late-night excursion through our yard, one neighbor ended up nose down the embankment of our upper driveway, apparently cracking a drain field pipe in the process. I am bringing this matter to your attention only so you are aware of the pain and hassle we have gone through with one sewer project that didn't even involve us. It 's a little disconcerting to think about Lake Riley Sewer Project 78-8. Irv--v-••_ May we please hear from you? ft, 7�,„ Q C r 1978 97r 0, John D. and Francine J. Heille o P lVED 9 249 Lake Riley Blvd. ��I�GE'op ° Chaska, MN 55318 co �, MINN SSEN, O N. c��``yj rtil�� . C ITY F / . CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth DATE: November 6, 1978 SUBJ: South Lake Riley Sanitary Sewer Extension The City Council set November 6, 1978, as the public hearing to consider the extension of the Lake Riley sewer system. Bill Brezinsky will present the feasibility study on Monday evening, a copy of which is attached. /X/ 047 P/7' UI ! y _ Utw - ,, .Vt__ ri , -:, .43 .2. 7: : ; li ' S SEr\I _ , , i , .... , ..07610 LAREDO DRIVE.P.O. BOX 147.CHANHASSEN, MINNESOT!1 55317 (612) 474-8885/- C ei/- • October 11, 1978 k' Mr. & Mrs. Peter Pemrick Mr. & Mrs. John Heille 15109 Orchard Drive 9249 Lake Riley Blvd. Burnsville, MN 55337 Chaska, MN 55318 Mr. & Mrs. Barry Bershow Mr. & Mrs. Ted Dockendorf 9251 Kiowa Trail 9261 Kiowa Trail Chaska, MN 55318 Chaska, MN 55318 Dear Property Owners: On October 16, 1978, the City Council of the City of Chanhassen will be considering whether to extend public sewer across the four lots owned by yourself and your neighbors. Should all property owners likely to be effected by the improvement agree to the project, a formal public hearing will not be required. If the City has not received notice from all four owners of their desire to have the improvement completed, the City staff will be recommending that a public hearing date be set for November 6, 1978, at which time public testimony will be received both for and against the proposed project. • • Points which will be considered by the City Council will include: 1) . A new home is being constructed on one of the four lots . However, whether this construction occurred on this lot or an adjacent lot this year or next year, or r whether septic systems on Kiowa fail this year or in the next five (5) years, the sewer will, eventually, be required. Problems created by allowing new septic ( systems to be constructed adjoining the lake and in t an area where septic failures have occurred cannot be recommended by City staff. t 2) . Although one owner has agreed to the proposed construction, the City Council does have the authority to initiate t and construct the sanitary sewer as a public improvement project and thus assure service to each of the four lots 1 and assure future service to owners on Kiowa. If initiated and ordered by the City Council, the costs of the improvement would be assessed against benefitting property. 1 Page 2 3) . As a project not involving replacement or repair of public streets, the cost is anticipated to be lower than on Lake Riley Blvd. The City' s consulting engineer will prepare an estimate for the project, but such is anticipated to be approximately $3,000 per lot. 4) . As a smaller project, easements should be of a similar character and thus assure that acquisition payments are similar and that the cost to all owners is approximately the same. 5) . Although the project could be completed yet this year, certification of assessments to the County Auditor' s office is no longer possible this year. As such, if the project were to be completed this year, the earliest assessments for the project could be certified is in August/September, 1979 for collection with property tax paymentsin 1980. On the Lake Riley project, assessments were spread over a 15 year period with interest at 7% per year on the unpaid balance. Again, if you are opposed to the proposed improvement project, it is not necessary for you to attend the October 16, 1978, meeting. You would be provided an opportunity to speak or present written comments on November 6, 1978. The October 16th meeting is only meaningful if all four owners support the project. If you have any questions in regard to this letter, please feel free ,-' to contact me. Sincerel , Don Ashworth City Manager 1 DA:k S tE i[k� )77/2. /940(ivak, 47"-A) of IgaA) tp. fixituir&. 7tetae ,_5.144%;e4e),) 61W/;'41- ina•L'all 7,25/ A",a;wiz?) aiJ acde_ 4,2%,„6,1,(44,,,%;,4 04, satuX0.7. 5.0/vzte-d) /riat4/$,..e)Adt ZO � 16:A/a-‘1),1a,ek/-/../),01.60M. co_4. 12,/4,*;7 0- fut,4-,1-(7 hia, /, ipi. cut ,.vie0,� ith7y ila) C‘e-GO .‘41-) . -744-,14)70(?)/PAIA;14) 41/&del;`)' 4;11, 641t Q9g(i /s/o q d'AtiAte4/64 . 2114114-a6)/&PT. 5.5-3.5'2 435- 769Fl6 /U g3S- 3o64e t CIT'{ OF ti - CHANHASSEN I 1 l i 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P_O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth DATE: November 20, 1978 SUBJ: Fill Permit Application, Property Owners Abutting Hill Street, South Lotus Lake. This meeting was scheduled to solicit comments concerning the proposed fill application of John Melby, John Segner and Wesley Arseth. Comments have been received from the Watershed District concerning the proposed fill and have been included in council packets. Staff is unaware of any potential negative implications to adjoining property owners from the proposed fill. However, the owners requesting fill should agree to hold the City harmless from potential suits between themselves or other property owners. Additionally, in reviewing documentation submitted, staff finds that although original discussions with the engineer included the Ronald Horr property, the fill permit application submitted to the city and Watershed District did not include this property. As drainage from the three owners will cross the Ronald Horr property, Mr. and Mrs. Horr should join in the application or in other manner, as prescribed by the attorney, agree to the fill. ("\ • C T • • E r L 7610 LAREDO DRIVE©P.O. BOX 147oCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 November 9, 1978 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Public testimony or written comments will be received by the Chanhassen City Council on Monday, November 20, 1978, 7 : 30 p.m. to consider the following application. Comments will be requested from both those opposing the proposed application as well as those favoring. A group spokesman may be designated noting those he is speaking for. Written comments may be read into the record on November 20 or mailed. Mailed comments should be received by the City on or before November 17, 1978 . A copy of the below application is on file at City Hall for public inspection. Applicants : Joint Application of John Melby, John Segner, Wesley Arseth, and Ronald Horr. Purpose of Application: To seek City Council approval of placing approximately 300 cubic yards of 'fill (per lot) in the rear yards of the applicants. Place of Hearing: Chanhassen City Hall, 7610 Laredo Drive. /9 Don Ashworth, City Manager I -,, Mr. Robert oavts , Mr. Fred uelscnlager Yvv • Blomberg Companies r7410 Chanhassen Road 501 West 78th Street ` Excelsior, MN 55331 ghanh5ssen, MN 55317 . ' . . 11 . . l' Mr. Ted Bentz 0 Ms. Mary Kurvers 7570 Chanhassen Road i! 7300 Chanhassen Road • Excelsior, MN 55331 ii Excelsior, MN 55331 1 . . 1 Mr. John Melby I Mr. Mel Kurvers 7540 Chanhassen Road ' ' 7240 Chanhassen Road Excelsior, MN 55331 I : Excelsior, MN 55331 I ' - Mr. John Segner I . Mr. Frank Kurvers 7530 Chanhassen Road 1 7220 Chanhassen Road Excelsior, MN 55331 l { Excelsior, MN .55331 1f i. Mr. Wesley Arseth t Mr. Lloyd Lierdahl • 7520 Chanhassen Road i ! 7417 Frontier Trail ,; Excelsior, MN 55331 1 . Chanhassen, MN 55317 t ' i Mr. Ronald Horr It . 1 7510 Chanhassen Road Iv . 1 .� Excelsior, MN 55331 f • i . I 1 is :_ H II Mr. Harvey Parker 11 7480 Chanhassen. Road �' t ' . Excelsior, MN 55331 k' : t 1 1 • 1 - 1 ._ . . ii 1 Mr. Donald Fowler is i 7470 Chanhassen Road i Excelsior, MN 55331 . lIt i, T: _ __ . . .._ . _ __ ______ Mr. John Vandahard 7500 Chanhassen Road 1 ' Excelsior, MN • 55331 �I - 1 li 1 /1 : . Mr. Irving Raymond h 1 7440 Chanhassen Road It ' Excelsior, MN 55331 11 • `. 1 !i . , Mr. Joe Welter it l' : 7420 Chanhassen Road I: . Excelsior, MN 55331 11 WILLIAM•D.SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T.VOSLER - - JAMES R.ORR •..,, HAROLD E.DAHLIN _ LARRYL.H _ SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. J JAC RAYMOND J.JACKSON c 3P' - WILLIAM J.BREZINSKY ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS JACK E.GILL +" RODNEY B. GORDON ' THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND (6121 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E. ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON. SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING October 16 , 1978. City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, City Manager P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Subject: Melby, Segner, Arseth & Horr Property Drainage & Restoration. Our File #9058C Gentlemen: We have met with above-named owners on several occasions and agree that additional restoration is required. This minor restoration, delayed because of wetness , will be completed this year. The possibility of providing excess material to the owners from other projects has been discussed. This is a possibility if the following conditions are met: 1) There is excess material available from a project after requirements of Public fill areas are met; 2) The owner must apply for and obtain fill permits from the Riley-Purgatory Watershed District and the City. The possible effects of filling in adjoining properties and Lotus Lake will be considered. We will continue to work with the owners to complete the restoration of the area disturbed during the City project to the homeowners satisfaction. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC . /�' ��'� 4 ti OCT 1978 o o RECEIV v�` "-LAGE p. obi WJBrezinsky:esg CHANHASS � �' cfDMINN. � cc: John & C. Melby `9S>£z ` Oc``o�' Jack Gill ...Mir;;)l 7� I'f ...araru Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District I L_ `� ��_" °� 8950 COUNTY ROAD g4 vs o '•. ". <•.^•»r• '`' EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343 . October 26, 1978 y I �� I Mr. William Brezinsky Schoell & Madson 50 - 9th Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 IRe: Filling on the Melby, Segner and Arseth 1 Properties in Chanhassen Dear Mr. Brezinsky: The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District have reviewed the plans, as submitted to the District on October 18, 1978, for filling on the above referenced properties in Chanhassen. A grading and land alteration permit will not be required from the Watershed District since this project does not meet the requirements set forth in Section E(2) of the District's Rules and Regulations. Due to the close proximity of the proposed alteration to Lotus Lake, the District suggests that the City include the following two conditions in the City's approval, if the project `�' is approved. 1. Erosion control measures, such as staked hay bales and snow fence, should be installed in the drainageway on the Arseth property to prevent sediment from leaving the altered arears and entering Lotus Lake. Erosion control measures should be installed prior to commencement of land alteration and should remain in place until the altered areas on the site have been restored. • 2. All altered areas should be restored with mulch and see or sod within two weeks from the commencement of land alteration. If you have any questions, please contact us at 920-0655. Sincerely, \ • \j a K r,, r Ro ert C. Obermey BARR ENGINEERING CO. r Engineers for the District j`�; -/-,o`�I 1,s 4. �I 15 I Rco/111 `tillg78 �' cc: All Managers 0G. W L Mr. Frederick Richards €� 1 ..._ RECEIVED Segner RECEIV , VItiAG5 OF �� ! Mr. Arseth y{ANHASSEN, V City-of Chanhassen MttiN• , I t Ali�:\ \aI i Date /C /7 Permit No. APPLICATION FOR EXCAVATING PERMIT Fee : Owners Name Ves �,, ys� � Telephone 4 - Address 7.5 2`) C `'i, /1�CC�io Excavator _ Telephone Address Lo+�' / /3 /Y Block 47 Subdivision rct , ""e ��-eeJ Site Address 7,S',2-,69 (21- Le? Description of work to be done: C l !_/ .767 / / / F 6 t; fl € Cam' / 'e Indicate the use or occupancy for which the proposed work is intended: ,j-t Estimated quantity of excavation 3 /e,-�/cubic yards Plot plan showing present elevations . Elevations after excavation is completed: Elevations of neighboring property within 15 feet of excavation: Location of any buildings or structures on the property where the work is to be performed and the location of any buildings or structures on land of adjacent owners which are within 15 feet of the property or which may be affected by the proposed grading operations : ,C72 e /* - Z— t c•j O&i in f,t, 1-911 APPT.Tr NTt G cTC:MATTiP1 -. - -4 g11.0.1111.11M- - _. • ; ' -. ill ( II 1 ----- -__ _ , .-...• V/1"11 LC-e....1"2"-sc'' __. , -1.., 1 1 ..,...`, - __ _ ___ ef/c_die 0/ _ ._.... „... I ..._. ._ ....... i •••••_. r-,.....;.. •, /. -..__ _ ---1, ....... 1.• ..- .... r - .I , .. *N. ,., ..e<... . . — -... • j,_,'‘. -,,. ----.. ....... , 1 \ -... [, - / , ----- • ---.-- "..... ,-/ \ '‘.. ... .. --..., • r ... 'i to . -,•,. .._, • i \ \ • :_ ,:_.•.. -- \ ---.\• ‘..i '": , ----. 1 • 4, Ci:4, 11,1.,1-'2'' ;.:- ‘;1 • \ ---- \ 1 k . .-.... .. • \ . I \ _-:,=___:\ . ... 11 01.-f I • - • -V. .. .....- .-1- . .'"c•-•-.... s -- - .-- 7.5 1• \\ 1 • , I . , ....v. ., . . ,. : , I\ ,,j ,. \ • . ,; l'•-• ' /7 . . ; , ? ••• ..,, i I VI_....-r, , , .,-t cct)ip \ . . \ / ' - .,A- • ., . •.. .1'- 1 I ‘ •'' .‘ . I . . \'. \ \• \ \ . ' V'' . ........2 ? . . i I 0.j.... - p. tic),( .„4 i I , ,.•'44. ''; ' -. It.''''':.....,........'."'...:s .....,. .....r../i/ -- \ I . ---• ,•• i°C) ......• .\ . \ "c N. •:',..:. ., • ..• I . , • - Vey-j,) i V . , - -/ • , . ,_•• s „:„.... •..c i I ,. If • .., • , / -9' 1,- 3 ,. ,,t-p ... ) fit-t-e. • Vc ,, 00_,\, 1 .,_-7---- I t • . .• .„ - ------P---- ---- \----- c .. . . , H.i.,.\/''r ' C.\ . ..-\\i / /,' ,..&• ,. •11- r \I \\ . ,....„....-- ',4%(;' ,, / / - A,. .-. • ,,. . . ,.. - • 4 i // /9..: . .---\ . .t, i .1. ....,... .t2,cr.t.41 ,., /, , \\ • .., . , .-„, , , 0--- ..1 0 • ., , . \ ‘ • % ‘ ) ... ,d / . • .../ AU-VLSI\\\ / ' / N.------- , 'IL / . •4 ....,_,,_• • 1. ( illrri.f.r-% 1 /. - . .,. .4• •-. > / . _‘•,-..40:4, -..*,--,•-•, • • 4. \-- /......-. . 4.,-• 4.4.5 1 Tt.=.^ . --\ • NI • 4k r — . . • / • ri / • • - ••-.r .ff,...'.;1 7‘,.....-.t.....,.. , .. ' COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 6 1978 Lit REGULAR CHANHASSEN CITY Mayor Hobbs called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p .m. with the following members present : Councilmen Pearson and Neveaux. Councilman Waritz came late . Councilman Geving was absent . The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilman Neveaux moved to approve the agenda with the addition of Diseased Tree Program. Motion seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Neveaux and Pearson. No negative votes . Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH LAKE RILEY SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION Mayor Hobbs called the hearing to order at 7 : 10 p.m. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the extension of sanitary sewer across ; a) the four lots between Lake Riley Blvd. and Kiowa, or b) to include sanitary sewer on Kiowa. The City Engineer presented the feasibility study for the two project . His estimate reflected a total cost of $8 , 494 for alternate A or a cost per home of $3 , 085 . The total cost of alternate B was estimated at $51,511 or $3 ,823 per home. The difference between the two alternatives is the additional costs of street restoration. Councilman Waritz came at 7 : 15 p .m. The hearing was opened for comments from persons present. John Bell - Did you look at the feasibility of running right down along the lakeshore all the way through and getting easements across as an alternative? Bill Brezinsky - Yes , we did. The problem is that if you run along the lakeshore you serve the lots along the lake you also have to have a line along the road. You are looking at almost double the length. The other alternative was if you ran along the lake and ran some sort of services up to these lots over here or manholes and we did look at that and the cost was more . John Bell - Under alternative B did you include, do you spread the cost of the road against those other four lots in alternative A? Bill Brezinsky - No, we didn't . It is the city policy to assess the abutting properties for the streets that they front on. Kathy Dockendorf - We are the second lot in on those four. Why couldn't the road come back in to Pemrick' s? They would be the last house on Kiowa Trail . Bill Brezinsky - That ' s a possibility. It could be looked into as part of this project . The city does not have the right to go in there and put in a public road right now. If these property owners would get together and dedicate that property for the right-of-way to the city, the city would probably consider extending the road to serve those properties . The cost of that would be assessed back. Ron Setter - A year ago when we talked about the Lake Riley Blvd. sewer being put in there was some comments about dry water pipes being put in, I would like to know where we are with that and why it hasn't been figured into this cost . Bill Brezinsky - When the road was restored this time we would be restoring it to about a 20 foot width which is existing. When the Council Meeting November 6 , 1978 -2- water pipe goes in in the future the road would be widened to a 28 foot city standard street . To answer your question as far as why we haven' t considered putting the dry water pipes in, in this feasibility study is , we did consider that on the Shore Acres Subdivision and they were not installed there so that ' s one more gap between you and the existing water on Highway 5 . Before water service is available to either of these areas it has to come down from Chanhassen Estates area down to Shore Acres which will require some development in between there and then it would have to go through Shore Acres which would require a public hearing so it looks like, I would say it ' s at least five years off right now. Jo King - Could you possibly define a unit and tell us upon on fact that you use to base those units? Bill Brezinsky - We counted the units as basically an existing platted lot or the unplatted metes and bounds described lots that we consider buildable. Mayor Hobbs - All we are showing you here is a sketch of which way the sewer would flow, a tentative place for the manholes , these are not the plans and specifications . John Bell - Over what period of time are these charges to the paid? Mayor Hobbs - That would be determined at the time of the assessment hearing. Normally we have been looking at a 15 year assessment . John Bell - What kind of interest rate? Mayor Hobbs - That depends on what the bond sale would go for . John Bell - What did the last one go for? Mayor Hobbs - The interest rate was 7%. Mayor Hobbs - As most of you realize this whole area down around Lake Riley is not involved in any comprehensive plans that the city has for sewer, water and street improvement . The Shore Acres project was done because of a majority petition of the homeowners . At the time we held a public hearing we included your area and a majority did not want it . Because of the uniqueness of this type of a public improvement project the Council elected at that time to stop the project where we did. I think had it been in the north area we would have finished it . Since we have completed the Shore Acres the property owners have come in and again requested that we take a look at sanitary sewer so we are now asking you people if you want us to take a look at it to go further on in. The costs do continue to go up . At some point in time the sewer will go through. The question that we have tonight is how many of you are in favor or how many of you still don' t want it . Fran Heille - We did not request and we are one of the four . Mayor Hobbs - The public hearing is here for you to express your opinions and the one thing we haven't heard are opinions on whether you want the project or you don't . John Bell - Go ahead with it . Ron Setter - Is there any sly things happening back in a corner about these roads being tied through with this plan that you are Council Meeting November 6 , 1978 -3- presenting to us right now with this feasibility study? Last year we talked about it and I guess some how convinced we did not want the roads tied through. We still do not want them tied through. Bill Brezinsky - Absolutely not . Unless we present it here this can't happen. Ron Setter - The only other question I've got is when you get a definite area where the manholes are going I would like to know because one of them is on our beach. Other than that we are for it . Sam Suhl - We are one of the newer residents out in the area. When we moved into our house in 1975 or 1976 I know in checking with City Hall we were told that city water and city sewer would probably be in the area of ten years away, for this reason basically I am opposed to the plan. Robert McCart - We just built a home a couple years ago and I am opposed to it . Mrs . Peter Pemrick - We are in favor of the plan. Peter Pemrick - Mainly because we are building now and we have to make a decision to put a septic system in or city sewer . Lee Mosman - I am for the project . Mrs . John Heille - If we go for alternate B we would vote yes . If it ' s alternate A only we would vote no . Mrs . Ted Dockendorf - No for alternate A. Yes for alternate B. Susan Luker - No . Barry Bershow - Yes . Arthur Bandimere - Undecided. What I am interested in, if this goes up there, I came up twice this summer, I was thinking of finishing that proposed plat that we had there or maybe sell it, I was wondering if this went through, if that was developed up there would that connect those same lines? Bill Brezinsky - You would have to run another line. The system would take considerably more. Councilman Neveaux moved to close the public hearing and that the record be held open until the next Council meeting to receive written comments . Motion seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes . Hearing closed at 8 : 10 p.m. AWARD OF BIDS - CHASKA ROAD WATERMAIN PROJECT 78-7 : Five bids were received on this project with the low bid from Burschville Construction Company of Loretto in the amount of $8 ,438 . 00 . RESOLUTION #78-64: Councilman Neveaux moved the adoption of a resolution accepting the low bid of Burschville Construction Company for the Chaska Road Watermain Project 78-7 in the amount of $8,438 . 00. Resolution seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes . Motion carried. ' MINUTES : Arbor Lane stop sign and lift station screening, Hibbert Hill will be on the next Council agenda. Councilman Pearson moved to approve the October 16, 1978 , Council minutes . Motion seconded by Councilman Neveaux. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson and Neveaux. Councilman Waritz abstained. Motion carried. • Council Meeting November 6 , 1978 -4- Councilman Neveaux moved to note the October 25 , 1978 Planning Commission minutes . Motion seconded by Councilman Waritz . The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes . Motion carried. RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT REQUEST, CARVER BEACH - JIM HAUPLMAN: . The City Building Inspector had asked the City Attorney for an opinion on the question; is the building office obligated to issue a building permit for parcels meeting city ordinances , but being contrary to the Carver Beach Plan? The City must either purchase that access that the city would potentially take away in the case of a trail system or allow the individual to build. Staff recommended that Mr. Hauplman be allowed to build with access to Huron. Mr . Hauplman is proposing to create two lots that abut Carver Beach Road and Huron. Due to the terrain along Carver Beach Road,access would have to be from Huron which is proposed to be a trail in the Carver Beach Plan. Sewer and water is in and assessed. Councilman Neveaux moved to table action until November 20th and request the City Manager set up a meeting with the Council and property owner to view the property. Motion seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes . Motion carried. RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT REQUEST - RICHARD ROSSING : Mr . Rossing was present requesting approval of a building peiiuit to construct a garage on the north 2 of Lots 1982, 1983 , 1984, 1985 and 1986 in Carver Beach with access to Laredo Drive . The Carver Beach Guide Plan shows Laredo Drive as a trailway. Councilman Neveaux moved to table action until November 20th and request the City Manager set up a meeting with council members and the property owner to view the property. Motion seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes . Motion carried. CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY, NORTHERN CABLEVISION: RESOLUTION ',E78-6S Councilman Waritz moved the adoption of a resolution that the City of Chanhassen, as an adjacent municipality, does not object to the within proposed CST. The City of Chanhassen takes no position at this time on the merits of the proposed CST. The City of Chanhassen, as an adjacent municipality, provisionally approves the proposed CST, in order to fulfill the requirements of approval or disapproval , and requests that it be kept informed of all the proceedings relating to the establishment of the proposed CST or any modification thereof. Resolution seconded by Councilman Neveaux. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes . Motion carried. REZONING REQUEST, BRUCE CAMERON, 6291 BLUE JAY CIRCLE : Mr . Cameron is seeking rezoning from R-1 to R-2 for a duplex he owns at 6291 Blue Jay Circle. The Assistant City Planner recommended that the council uphold the R-1 classification. This recommendation is conditioned upon a city attorney' s opjnion to the effect that the duplex in existance can remain as a duplex unless it is significantly damaged or destroyed necessitating major repairs or reconstruction. The Planning Commission recommended the council rezone the property to R-2 . Council Meeting November 6, 1978 -5- Mr. Cameron - The thing was sold to me as a legal duplex. I think it is a little strange that things have gotten messed up so much. I have got a piece of paper here that says it ' s a legal duplex and it also shows a double assessment on it . It was sold to me as a legal duplex and I have been under this assumption for three years now and it was a legal duplex when I bought it , it should have been the same when I sold it . Russell Larson - It is a legal duplex in the sense that it can be continued to be used as a duplex subject, however, to the provisions of our non-conforming use section of the Zoning Ordinance . This happens to be a letter of November 3 , 1975 , from Jerry Schlenk advising as to the assessments against the property, discussing the SAC charges and necessity for plumbing permits, etc . and he ends saying this dwelling is registered with the city as a legal duplex. It doesn' t refer to the zoning. In Jerry' s sense of the word, it is a legal duplex and we assume it to be a unit that can be used for two families because we gave it two assessments . As it now stands under the zoning ordinance it is a non-conforming use. You can sell it . You can give it away. You cannot enlarge it . If it is destroyed beyond a certain amount it cannot be reconstructed as a duplex unless you get a zoning change. Mr. Cameron - That hardly makes it marketable. If the guy is buying a duplex he is also buying it because of the income that it ' s providing. 1 1 Councilman Pearson moved to deny the request for rezoning and allow the continuation of a non-conforming use at 6291 Blue Jay Circle subject to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance . Motion seconded by Councilman Neveaux. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux. and Waritz . No negative votes . Motion carried. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, DEAN DEGLER - TEMPORARY MOBILE HOME: Mrs . Degler was present requesting approval to place a temporary mobile home on their farm located near the intersection of Galpin Blvd. and Audubon Blvd. Several months ago the Deglers requested permission to construct a permanent residence for their son on this parcel . The Carver County Highway Department has plans for the construction of a new intersection of Galpin Blvd. and Audubon Blvd. with construction to be completed around 1981. Due to the uncertainty of the alignment of this intersection, the Degler' s requested that they be conditionally permitted to provide a temporary residence in the form of a mobile home for their son and his wife who are presently living in the Degler residence . The Planning Commission recoi►uuended a conditional use permit be granted to the Deglers to provide a temporary residence for their son in the form of a mobile home subject to the following conditions : 1 . That the temporary structure be at least 20' from any existing buildings . 2. That the septic system meet all Health Department standards . 3 . That the conditional use be terminated within one year after completion of the improvements on the intersection. The City Manager recoituuended denial of the request . Councilman Neveaux moved to deny the conditional use permit for a temporary mobile home and request city staff meet with Pat Murphy to resolve the issue of the road alignment . Motion seconded by Councilman Council Meeting November 6 , 1978 -6- Pearson. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes . Motion carried. DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW, PHASES II AND III , HESSE FARM: Mr. Hesse is proposing to subdivide phases II and III of the Hesse Farm into 28 residential lots . A variance is request to Ordinance 45 to permitkd the subdivision and platting of land in the unsewered area. The Assistant City Planner recommended that if the Council approves the preliminary development plans that the following conditions be setforth: 1. That final development plans be reviewed in light of a response from the insurance service ' s offices concerning the overall effect of the development upon the fire classification ratings for the city. 2. That a development contract be drafted that consigns the responsibility for maintenance of the interior streets to the developer. 3. That a development contract be drafted that delineates the variances to ordinance, including lots abutting private streets , street grade , cul-de-sac length, resubdivision plan and platting and subdivision in an unsewered area. 4. That a development contract be drafted which provides for better construction of interior streets than is found in the first phase , and also requires the developers to prepare plans and specifications necessary for the installation of roads and storm and surface water drainage facilities with said plans to be approved by the City Engineer. The City Engineer gave his report of November 2 , 1978 . Trunk sanitary sewer service will not be available to this property in the foreseeable( future. City water is not contemplated for the area for some time. The cost of a well and pump house to serve this area would cost approximately $40 ,000 . The watermain system would cost approximately $54 , 376. This would probably be a higher cost than individual wells. The street alignment is dictated by the topography. One access is proposed to serve the 21 lots. The Engineer suggested that the developer provide a second access street or at least an emergency access road. He further suggested two seal coat applications on the streets. The Council expressed concern about a second access road. Frank Burg, representing the Hesse' s , explained that an emergency access road could be provided and built to a 9-ton capacity. Councilman Pearson moved to approve Phases II and III of the Hesse Farm preliminary development plan with the understanding that this is an exception to the normal roll based on the fact that Phase I had been approved prior to the moratorium and subject to the conditions setforth in the Assistant City Planner' s report of November 3 , 1978. The developer will install an emergency access road sufficient to support emergency vehicle loading with an easement granted to the City. Motion seconded by Councilman Neveaux. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes. Motion carried. SPECIAL MEETING - CANVASS ELECTION RETURNS : Councilman Neveaux moved to hold a special meeting Thursday, November 9 , 1978 , at 6 :00 p.m. to canvass election returns. Motion seconded by Councilman Waritz . The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz. No negative votes. Motion carried. Council Meeting November 6 , 1978 -7- DISEASED TREE PROGRAM: Policies for removal of trees and reimbursement under the program if they fall within the 20 day period were discussed. Mal MacAlpine had 28 trees marked and he tried to have them taken down within the 20 days but ran over slightly. The City Manager made the Council aware that Mr. MacAlpine may be an exception to the program as far as the 20 days. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Hobbs asked if any Council Member wished to discuss any items on the consent agenda. It was requested that item a. Set Public Hearing date - Fill Permit Application; item b. Authorization of payment, final consultive services, Ehlers and Associates;. item c. Animal Licensing, Suspend late fee penalty for 30 days ; and item g. Proposed 208 Water Quality Plan be discussed separately. As no additional comments were received, Councilman Waritz moved to approve the following items pursuant to the City Manager' s recommendations : d. Accept Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Installation, Trolls Glen 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Additions. e. Set Public Hearing date - Street Vacation Request, Arboretum Drive, University of Minnesota. January 15 , 1979 . f. Order of Removal, Hazardous Building, 6660 Opal, Carver Beach. h. Development Contract, Ecklund and Swedlund East Lotus Lake Residential Development. Motion seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson , Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes. Motion carried. FILL PERMIT APPLICATION - PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO HILL STREET: Wesley Arseth, John Melby, and John Segner have applied for a fill permit to fill a portion of each one of their lots located on the south side of Lotus Lake. The Riley-Purgatory Creek Board of Managers have reviewed the plans and determined that a grading and land alteration permit will not be required from the watershed district but suggested that the city include two conditions if the project is approved. 1. Erosion control measures , such as staked hay bales and snow fence, should be installed in the drainageway on the Arseth property to prevent sediment from leaving the latered areas and entering Lotus Lake. Erosion control measures should be installed prior to commencement of land alteration and should remain in place until the altered areas on the site have been restored. 2. All altered areas should be restored with mulch and seed or sod within two weeks from the commencement of land alteration. The City Manager recommended that the Council hold a public hearing and formally notify property owners in the area and invite their comments prior to final approval. Councilman Waritz moved to notify adjacent property owners of the fill permit application which will be on the Council Agenda for November 20 , 1978 . Motion seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes . Motion carried. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT, FINAL CONSULTIVE SERVICES , EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES : Councilman Neveaux moved to accept the City Manager' s recommendation of November 3 , 1978 , in regard to the Ehlers and Associates billing in the amount of $262. 50 . Motion seconded by Councilman Waritz. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes. Motion carried. Council Meeting November 6 , 1978 -8- ANIMAL LICENSING, SUSPEND LATE FEE PENALTY FOR 30 DAYS : Councilman Waritz moved to accept the City Manager' s recommendation to delete late fee penalty from November 1st to November 30th, 1978 . Motion seconded by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz. No negative votes. Motion carried. PROPOSED 208 WATER QUALITY PLAN DEVELOPMENT GUIDE : No action was taken. Councilman Pearson moved to adjourn. Motion seconded by Councilman Neveaux. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, and Waritz . No negative votes. Meeting adjourned at 11: 15 p.m. Don Ashworth City Manager SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING TO CANVASS THE CITY ELECTION NOVEMBER 9 , 1978 Mayor Hobbs called the meeting to order at 6 :00 p.m. with the following members present: Councilmen Pearson and Waritz . Councilmen Neveaux and Geving were absent. RESOLUTION #78-66 : Councilman Pearson moved the adoption of the following resolution: WHEREAS the Biennial City Election was duly held on Tuesday, November 7 , 1978, for the election of the Mayor for a term ending on the first business day of January 1981 and for two Councilmen for terms ending on the first business day of January 1983, and WHEREAS the City Council of Chanhassen has this date duly met as the City Canvassing Board to declare the results of the election returns made by the Election Judges. Said results are listed on the attached Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council sitting as the City Canvassing Board hereby declares the results of the Biennial City Election for the year 1978 as follows : 1. For the position of Mayor - Walter B. Hobbs. 2. For the position of Councilman - John L. Neveaux. 3. For the position of Councilman - Richard P. Matthews . Resolution seconded by Councilman Waritz. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson and Waritz. No negative votes. Motion carried. Councilman Pearson moved to adjourn. Motion seconded by Councilman Waritz . The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs , Councilmen Pearson and Waritz. No negative votes. Meeting adjourned at 6 : 30 p.m. Don Ashworth City Manager r E Exhibit A GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 HEN. PRECINCT #1 PRECINCT #2 PRECINCT #3 PRECINCT #4 CTY. TOTAL TOTAL VOTED 791 701 538 509 2 2,541 i....., i MAYOR Walter B. Hobbs 622 615 465 410 2 2,114 Write Ins 46 11 16 22 0 95 Blank/Defective 122 75 55 77 0 329 790 701 536 509 2 2,538 COUNCIL John Neveaux 513 592 442 352 0 1,899 Write Ins: Dick Matthews 140 19 134 20 0 313 Wally ConAron 81 7 4 74 0 166 John Ziegler 12 125 6 17 0 160 Clark Horn 82 2 2 59 0 145 Jim Bohn 78 0 5 1 0 84 Frank Kurvers 8 0 2 32 0 42 Other Write Ins 95 50 53 68 0 266 Blank/Defective 571 607 428 392 0 1,998 1 1,580 1,402 1,076 1,015 0 5,073 j -- ( . { LARSON S ME.RTZ t ' ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RUSSELL H.LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE CRAIG M. MERTZ (612) 335-9565 OF COUNSEL. October 9, 1978 HARVEY E.SKAAR MARK C.McCULLOUGH This item was considered on Jerry Schlenk October 16, 1978, and tabled to this Chanhassen Building Inspector meeting. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Building Permit - Two Building Parcels, Carver Beach - Jim Hauplman. Dear Jerry : You have asked this office to respond to the question of "Is the building office obligated to issue a building permit for two parcels meeting city ordinances, but being contrary to the Carver Beach Plan?" You note the following facts : 1 . The two parcels represent an accumulation of lots 2002 -2011, 2042-2049, and 1997-2001; the accumulated square footage total being in excess of 40, 000 square feet and the area per parcel being in excess of 20, 000 square feet. 2. Although both parcels have frontage on Carver Beach Road, the existing terrain will not allow access from this street. 3. The parcels have frontage on Huron, and Huron provides the only reasonable future access for residential purposes . 4 . The City did levy full sewer and water assessments against both parcels, with service provided from Huron. 5 . Under current city ordinances, your office has the authority and would normally issue building permits to these parcels assuming other ordinances were met, i .e. front and side setbacks , etc . (which you have informed me would be met by these parcels) . However, if your office issues the permit, such permit would conflict with the Carver Beach Plan wherein Huron is proposed to be an unimproved utility road and trail. As a practical matter, I see no other option open to the city but to approve the building permits for these two parcels. For this office to begin eminent domain proceedings to acquire these tracts, we would be forced to show a public purpose in such acquisition which would involve a demonstration by city to abide, at least in part, with Carver Beach Plan, the incorporation of the plan into the city' s comprehensive plan, and the nature of the public purpose being served by such acquisition. , Jerry Schlenk -2- 10/9/78 In light of the city' s effort to control attorney expenses, I believe it is prudent to determine whether the council desires to see our office proceed with eminent domain proceedings and whether the city is in a position to purchase the land if such necessity were found. It should also be noted that the Carver Beach Plan is merely for study and review purposes, and has no official status . It is not part of an official map such as is contemplated by Minnesota Statute 462.359, which could be used to deny a building permit provided the city is prepared to acquire the property under sub- division 4 of the statute. Further, it should be noted that Huron at this location is a platted city street which may require impr• - •-nt if it is to serve residences served by the street iel - s, RUSSELL H. LARSON Chanhassen City Attorney RHL:mep Additional Comments: This item was tabled on November 6, 1978, to allow the council to review the site. The council is between a rock and a hard place on this issue, i.e. the attorney' s report leaves the city little discretion on denial of the building permit (unless the council determines that reasonable access can be gained from Carver Beach Road) ; and, on the other side of the coin, approval will have a negative impact on the Carver Beach Plan and will, in all likelihood, generate a necessity to hardsurface Huron. � rr•�9 k!11 /�f� J jll VII_LA�+w 54 . i �. MINN. ..\;-, �'?-'i -'III wit Ill 10 634 10 1111111114ZIW40 ---..:-,_ i W II 40 7-------- -,:--.- ..-,_, . •-.:- • I1 Ii --4-f.r.:, . ,::.7:'''''•;, ,!I ii!.; •••,:, , --,-:,,•..";: •- . .... .. :•:.*A-- -• --___. Wait .‘41111111%,.. INF :11114111.,lk.,, hifttr I 1 ....... I• . ,...,.... - ___ ftlit . ,,,_,..._:.....,17: _ ...., -,..:---- --., .--.... ---.. ., ; ,. R Am._ .....,- .---. _,--._ --„, A . . so,__ „-•- ..-c--- -• -.At'''. 'y --- - - --61 ----:?...-c-, - ..• ._. ---, ,.. • 0 s„ ,. .,,,..„• '--7.... Q .c.,f---------•.. '.-- • .:1.-.. •/ , i -_____ Ap 111.AA._ ir .- ..._ .,''.•:-.. 'T _...--...,-.7:::-.2_-7...0.•-• . . , . ,,.: ,..._ .,..- -•••..,, - ...-.;:.-7 s'''': •'z C° •• -., alties**111 404 Of ,,,-,_,....- •!11,5.1,44113 -,... • 4. I...1 ". \....• ..'"-••••• ! --:•,-._, .7... --'-'':•,*4 .• ":•4141117:i ,*'•,•_.f.,„r, Ilealt- .., !' ' • CO /,1 Al ,"..;..7.•Us,,Plir•:"ft, ".•:- ::- .:•,.• i 1 . .1":„... ..-_____.----•1 ....J .4-1!~11114 ,,..• .z,..,:_„.........n„.--7•-..-..;:-,4?.;'..eita • •••••••::A. • ..•-•,--‘" 4§ ii-sei 1'1111111111111 a IllWri.V ri •••. :... ,-. i / Cy i I-• 'a; i 806 454.4o-74Ni; wit? -,,--.....,.. --k...-. .:,.‘,...,....„. ..4.,......-; _ ,..., • tit 0 . itio Cr ' "Z. ••••'1,!•-,-,•••r -,..!_....:::„71,-, --" , ••_,,. ... • ---,-- Cr) 1 .4! -. it iiff!s 0 .....,,,, ,. y.--....1s,:, -3c , f • ...--..„.'-c-.. :-_-„,_ ,5'.,\L 1 -clur 4..Y-A4,:-,, ••..... s i .1. 7-ztaio-4, w. 67 T14 . 4. -:: .,,,,, r, c.„;,:. ..,,.." vir -7. ;.:"., ,...1 ••`-' I1A Si 'Cf..' i I c,....1 9 -,- , ....e.c..- 1 114:-:.• .- ‘--.. --:*'''':: ,ii-V, _z-, - ":7 f4, f f.r ,... ,i.. • (el•• 44"4 . -1164. 'A'‘.9 r 41.1‘46,411% lit I 9 v" ..n.: TAMARACK ROAD // P7•rj a •if JOG' c'e".f. aj • ' . 1 '4,N. ,1,,,'4• '/-- /4-4,f,_,.4! .,:).- :. , • # ofe .k..-x, .. 17 -7,...-4,,.._, . • ,.. . , 1 rra• , i;el ri •••;;> ;••,‘,,I, o i _,. z• . .•74,i.• II i t° - ,.,'.-..;..-. •./. .... . :4,,,,\,,,\,.. . --,,,,,..--- ,,,,-_ . ;g 1.. •,'"4-• , iSd"" • , ,.. _ _ 4 • , „.. t k\ ..• , •- , . ,‘1 • - -. , Nt• ev \\evs,", 2,0••• • , 1 r • ....... • :.-.._. ..•. i ROAD ° .? ..' \i_DP Op ov, vitevem,,r,,, . • , _ . . 0 .\ & `,..9 *it \,\- "t• Ailf,f,..110: olifCfro • ,\ • • i . 0 4LX% .__---- . _.,.... ., , 103 1 o,ji•I\ ik llimie.--4••• A) ' -• . CARVER BEAC RD(Juniper Rd)V .4,.*;,- R.„--4•3 -0,...0 .. ... .. vt.....-- -414....-4,-gb-._._.: .* •\, ::, . --,7;-::::::•-• , - „.•, -....... ••04,-... . -....,VI ;., •,4 . --47.-7.„;..._..ditu, ... 7 C -7 - • 111":7-r,.. ...a."..0, •• • i .. _ , ,t ....- •p.--e-osie, .. c.. ,..gb ‘\ iii ri: •-•....,-. - 'A /- \\ • • MEM 1,- 0 \\ \ : : : '. , - ...::••••• , 1 i'2'°. x 0•"-..,;..,, -:-P•.- .7..:'e.,,,ett.' t 0 IVY ; ,... ROAD •- ,r-- -,., t .: . n D.1•1 vi Mini_ 7y, t;•' •,. -;'1...-•iiiolek“ Ot ,..t• \ ... , ,..-zt:i•FP4','--: - I I I lia 74'-'0. Wit t * ' '"1:-,i't .-f - "••-•'''.'i, '\-..s% '' :-......-q,Lt.,;•:., • , col 1 arimim-li •,,- ..*---21 $ . ,-. ,.......• .,- ,, . aimimismi 40 ,..., -ssce V-.,4,•-•••;:re',••••-:, p, :..„..,:„..-., . •-:.,•,.••• • • • 1 1 „...,...:-: , . =ma ., • vi.„ ._„..„---::„.•:• _.... .....10 00- -4- --- ....,.-.....:....- • ..,,,,,,,•-,, . ,• Le MIMS -'-': 1111 0 .. • - ---:-' ,..,,,' i" .-' - '-'..?•;i'•-•':,7:''...i... '. , , . .:1&;.•?••7•:-.e.,.:-_-•,:-'. - ..• : 1.14 I I i I, .INNIS?z.. WitS,,o - ,....•,' ;.ii;i100 '' ' Pv•%<''-' -' •••'- - ' "- ''.- - ' \ -,,,,:• •??..:*.;..:±--...•: - - . ?-.1 1 I ' I 1-r-Fdi 0 10011115 t --- --:‘'-; ° • ''''''''''''--.40 ' ---i-- : :-'• , - ,•-01 -.,-_""••• . s, . „,,„.1'.4.4.oLkis... ..-•,. -.. I o -11-;;;;;;•174) ‘4,..-•.:4:. ..-v----za '' . .-HAWTHORNE RD • . Z ---- "7:-.-1": --- ---j.' .000001.11C-1;'-c. 4.!/ .` •• -• • --,•••••.v••,Te•!I.!';••• --- - - , I' • ,. 1-4 - - -- :'iii Tdr-i•14.4 .11,.:: • ...'"'•-•r•-:'•4:.; ..i...melNii Ise• - •`•••?' lamilm•-___,,44 A3--.1U're,-Ii;•1--.. • • .... .., . _ , __ -, _ -. .f. -- -'..,'... - -• ,-,,-14.,•••:f2c,;,,i.•:::::1-.- . i r-. ,4_, ' - .-''•:•,-• ---.47111......iik -. 100. 01,0 • :•-,1r.:74.9T-4.4.4,--- -----.7".- .19 I I 1 .1_ , .. ,.. le ,,..0,. 000 -:. - O. • ...,-....hc ....„., '''''• ' ' 1,71- it;14--!.'7-. . ..71:- • , 11 ' roil_ - ....I • ',NW-, ;":4-7,14'1; it '.;::.„.- - 1,4 ii . 1 II - • -- • - • „„gtioi •6 . •.: - •• - •••t. ._a..• •• ,i1910k-‘:. "". :.%r• It, 1 t ' Ixt y.,.. •- .4''''--,.•;. 1,A), • 12 '-‘ . l'..IA • tost7W '. ‘..f.,•,:c" . rt4e---r-'---- •• = ..c. i 1 1 -?. ,,,liessi . , ,-- •er_ . 0 .s- W. ! 68TH • *. - ST. (Grove Road) ..-.,--.-..• - - 1- '-' 13 -,.•••,‘ ? 1..-',.;I.'.s-'''• •in • i•cl..' 0 ^''',, ' ef..;.e.:•:,..,7-', , . I ;40 1 \ liilW"'V' %V. ' .\7..... .1,., •„.. .. • .t1:1V: v‘...•;4•:%7 44 Q. f•OsTrZ:i.---,74-1:,-, . -. - IN *, I ii - 0.010?.. ....'• _,,1%. 016.-'.•4j(1/4I''''.1". ‘.:::;'1-14frA.-4-1-"I''''''' t'Iti•12;•"-zt-;-• . . 3 • -r-1--1 fl - -'•'.' . , r tf-- .1-:•••:::,•., L.:• ' ?ZE: I 0 100 ..,..: .-: .4.....i...-... .. C.- • ...:). 1 4r-1,. I, .1 • 1 I ii I 1 lisre„,,Srf,7 7, jei I !'.4 (;) i .1 04 •OlfrO 4.1° °1°.10 1°. -----T>.:::•i: ;,........:-:-.: 10#:4 •13.11 • .. . iiiO4!‘i „600001• . -0 • .-.., .0. •9"" ' ..... 1,FOREST ;ROAD ,... :-. A '_:.1,.,t;i4" ;0'-i•i•-:;- '''' •••••• ...•_ 4,ye, Air 4'.....;... S\ri ;;... :•;:a..%.b.... .*- .e... 4•'.... ....:0111 .- , I : • ..4...A1,2572 t 1..._',„,;,.. .,...,_... 1000./.....01e4 0/000....4si....:: .:.:.%!.;w14:!...4;,....11.a.S,4 *, 0.....:471\ -1-1.:S....?-•;;. •-,. i ej :1 1 I Ng-A- •''':i -.11' 1,-;:,...41;--•'.:- 0 ,-•,.... 1.-- ' s4 s „ A A .-.• 1; ' . • I , s. i '••'• ' :. Cr "...,-(1••..:1011 a •,• ‘11‘.-- -:0,00 CI d;' - 1.t:IIVI .....00,. .;•---- .-' - ' 1 I 1 1 il • .- 0 OA 41:7---•,..'71 7--'.-- • .11,. . fr.:,-1---1• - -.evAL.,----:,--- " i 1 k....0. ...„ 4". 1.i..,'';':%,1-!-;:- .t...'t.•;):',.....r..... in ...r>.A.7....- -;',._• -...‘;',;'. 42./....-,V1Lces'rfl";•''-* .1.‘-.1t.f2;, _•-.Ft•.-7-"•.'-. '•-7 • • • l'" 1 '; " a'.�'yy.. 3 - j Sih'4 y' _ -W.. 4:� - -+•s'Y'' A.�.." '77W;I _ ..ems ..:csct' .e:`•'{'."-.'3'.=-. • -.- i-• N. `,, ._ 1�•iJ.l�w.--.1„;,..1 ice].;.. .z:c lFr:.-k1f�`r1.•+rdeallrs�s iiaszyw..ir___ •'4 ... .-- .,;,. 'n > ' ••44.4..d.ak i+u73Y:,r2..:....,. .3Y•-'Ti,L•ia'�.a Cwl`L.s..e bnavrt • i I / _ / T-� 111 .041 /„......-,, / ,..,..,.....''. '‘ ' /. r k -13 l'„,., lut-,z,Lf47),t . _....till IA r o r- J t„ O r' ; O C (ter m �/' , ?� -r Ai- e c. J r r. .,= _ yJ. b y li ,-p r itµ /�, �• �: ',v Ix ..1:) i---"It. ...--sN N [ : __ta*t '-` ^.-+ -'' ' nl ,• .n w 0 ` , fir, •A '—.+- -: a c) `1' -,. ,a ,b a bI • b ! , , 1 ;� L� ,` 3 �.t a / L /! I 1111 4. i r j: ? la-. YJ 1/ N OV NPos i It*, •i2oi (� /� , _. . _� ��-1 CSC j r / } 1 : •.4 q" �� ' l{ %:?..,., v U0 ' � r...ic a— Is" I'..• -- = 0 • \ ' b! i� �� n I . , � �``O� �' . a \ ® ! ❑ ,ram-r4`.• i `✓ �= �1- Q t` M .� . `,. �`fl` t� -yam'-' / �,.1!► _41-\*Al r\ o f Z C7 1 1 W. \ ., . I N 1 •�- n — O i3 t t _ e \ ZiO er'u ® i i /t . .i. �. , 1_.. �..,`.�/ . ._,'-;�f p ,, ' y�, Y1 -. 4 Q= ' a1° � 1 . ` `•: 1 » .', S= o ©/ bbo / / / .,;; j r1. 1 y i i � , r kni ' �' `'�jn .A. -.� sue!'ii. la r: c• ' ,; a /4. t• 4- -0,... •- 1 • :II di,. ,,.,1-.."../ .. „C.el ,,p „. - --.--..... ?.41.....1....z/ V/71% 1.. .fr -TIS) * In 4 1: �rc= 2 J,- �7 £,, Pi b _ a f�X.j- .• 4 -••._ H • r'` �. � X�� R �t l *1 I oritorea V t r b4 O "t 4, s X CI\c y DI INr T'�11� J, J .. . b2 Tao, ob w ss .. p 1 - ate -• h bZZ� 1 , F l �c un r—.a� b1''." �Z r �� 'mac`: / 'R(-ti ti A ---i p " b up 4, p ` fix' yz 7R C`�Il10 .O -rf••• _.....t.,..; C I TY ® F sA. CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 7X IS i/e.,, Gvc.S -74-4 MEMORANDUM �o No"' 6 /, / DATE: October 30, 1978 s��e TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth & Building Inspector, Jerry Schlenk FROM: Ass 't. City Planner, Bob Waibel SUBJ: Carver Beach Guide Plan, Reference Richard Rossing Building Permit Request In response to your comments regarding the compatability of the trailway and residential sites as shown in the Carver Beach Plan, I have the following. The trailways in the previously developed portions of Carver Beach, by necessity will have to provide interior pedestrian circulation compactedly alongside streets already in existence. I do not know exactly what the traffic count along Laredo Drive at this point is, however, it is only approximately a block and a half long and terminates at the intersection of W. 68th Street. Due to this rather short distance, it would be believed that the traffic loads along this stretch of street would not be significant and would possibly lend itself to simultaneous trailway and city street uses. In reviewing the Carver Beach Plan, it appears that the only pedestrian trip destinations along the Laredo Drive trailway, would be to the area noted as the potential park area preserve pond in the Chapparal Outlot A, and to the park and open space preserve area south of West 68th Street between Mandan Drive and Carver Beach Rd. There is an additional trailway leading south of this southerly park and open space preserve, to an area within the Chapparal addition Outlot C open space. There was a similar situation concerning the trailway during the time of the Cliff Jacobsen replat request along Ivy Rd. It was my opinion on the Jacobsen replat request that due to the relative shortness of Ivy Rd. , and also the compact development of the Carver Beach Area, I felt that the dual-uses of trailway and city street is workable out of necessity under conditions such as those along Ivy Rd. Don Ashworth & Jerry Schlenk -2- October 30 , 1978 In conclusion I find that Laredo Drive should be considered both trailway and public street because of the parcels abutting it that will be receiving access onto Laredo Drive. At most, the Carver Beach Plan seems to be expressing a concept of pedestrian circulation within Carver Beach on Laredo Drive. I feel that there exists little possibility of any physical improvements to accommodate pedestrians. :4/ Manager's Comments This item should also be considered in light of the previous agenda item - "Building Permit Application, Jim Haupleman" . Approval of the permit application is recommended. R- 1. I TY 0 F Y,t CHANHASSEN i .' = 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • :.,,;� (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 26 , 1978 TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth FROM: Building Inspector, Jerry Schlenk SUBJ: Carver Beach Guide Plan Richard Rossing is requesting a building permit to construct a garage on his property in Carver Beach on the North h of Lots 1982, 1983 , 1984, 1985 & 1986. He also owns Lots 1981 to 1976, as shown on the attached drawing. He is proposing to meet all City setbacks. Our problem is, once again, the Carver Beach Guide Plan, the Guide Plan shows Laredo as a parkway. I cannot issue a permit for a property that does not abut a public street. jutiSCELIJI / i. `. fl` I t ti � '� ' '` ', '�, 'l —f— . _, �t r _ ,� 1 i J ! , i i/' • 7 h •- jtc0 •. .-� ; /� 7 ` TA Igi x --- T— 't :'- 1 l •i` f'i a i Cf.r 2 i i li. (.•a i-- as a e v S I�I`_; t CC y �� •'` • \,..., ,_-: ...- .. _`._�..._� -..— 15 es y—- ,i 1.r-; 't [� _ Part of �i�J� • Nap of Carver Beach at Long Lake - .-- Rossings own Lots 1960 through 1965, 1976 through 1954; Wilsons own Lots 1985 through 1991. - zirt 'a' - ,.y� i Gy, ' �-.t < may, "..._ ''.-,� . f '*. F•cr •' <- •" 4,,I ,e. , "As1 � "� > �r -:H�! l '" • :' . ., ` • "mo . TXC : L te r:� [ ~-.-?, : -: � . •7-X-0t.2i � - eb 3-'i-1 '' A ..aiW.2. .„ i1rA e,1 `` e.sa x....:".. .t j 1 1= M t= Ii littA e ll - ) -. 1, ., , , , , . . f i l ] ``. _ % -- i i ots - / k !1 s►-A o1 —_�. is ! M !'` 3 SI F i ,... ' if__--' 1,1 th - I I h A a tr" -.., ...• A i 1 .._.,- f `, 7. c.-- .-- ..., ;•-•"1 ) I 11)4t -- ' . ...t•••••* %..... • r. i . . .._--.k-ctiA ‘ ___Ji CD r"' 0 / r 4%..)6I , i 11 ,, 1 .' 1 ift, : 11•1, , -_,g, ,3,iY * //I : tin u :\\' . 1 i` O IA= �1br/ --.t— _.4=In - "_ \, �� • 1 ei .t.‘ t . .... -9 --1-14, .....4_,. op I _ _......„..... , , \ ......___E-.2.1.1..... _.t.... „ere.,;•-' 1,445-,...! ..,....--j I\(1 �t / J ❑ 3-,t - , t. ti ir+11) 1 , �� _ \ .N .-. ik 0t o ° " , �., r'r- - 4& N t, 0.41, , t i 1 tot ,‘ MI `.-,:,-,-,;,i'-''''s---- '-'1,;•'• ,, -‘,.1/4,41k,' ,_ ,, ._ d_ y O v ��• •i / , ; �{ , v>'; . = Jt: ' to 4. t ii.. ... e 4 / ' _' 'Vi � 4 AMA PI FT_ -111,..,: i ,r ,-.:.• - .. 44.0:,,_ :4:....,,,,:f. -..-•,,,,-,5...7-, at N.-----—--------' li A° . -.. c , ,,c, ' L. -.0-A; ->.--7: - k"I 0 ri \-...,,,,Inel k, ti ‘.,n VII - SA il-k___ • •44:„0,.'":..-' / 0 i..." fr.:t" '\ h 1 l 'A. ••••2 CI ;::1.d. i /I A..140 .: - *'.$I flY :-.. - - t— 1 /", ..„,..-et -- ,..- * -..' igiiri: ..."....!,- is s I k 1.1 c r• d / n Ni • 4.Own'• \ 1 , O :;'- •(04, 1 =,-rr# Ch (l('•C, \ 3 EI ‘ eV- 2S --....-`''' ,' — can _ u,11� t �y IN,13�-.� -t, o e 0,o_ s ' ('` y CD b�2uhz _ ...... k , . , - . • 4 ,_ • \kW.' -I•.... .. ,._ CARISO:\i'S VOLIC SERVICt S#1- _ FP(----'.'•1 kr',0 tii"a , 6c,x 4„ l',--0.9 A r.t fw .a.4 • ,, , .t is,„),. - Excelsior, tviinnesota 55331 . '. Wit, Phone # 474-6840 iii 3 19 .2LF TO C42-1--- 4 ; i ii . .-.,f.' ::„.12:...:.2 4r 1SS • ..: .. . , CIF( (_.:ke..,....k-,1-4-4.....e„-' 17)‘. c._,:,,......• il I a . 1 i i ri.,.....„...4) . ......,„- ,....-,-_6,..........., , .--t :26 I, • I i I II , I t7 F , 7 . .9......„ I TS I; fi r ,- a e t• ,1 i i. 1 :• --- • ' • - :4::)b/, i i; •\,- 1 n <4'1- .._____,. ..1?; RECEIVED i 1 z'''s VILLAce as „I-- . .._ c-> CHANNASszte, - I ---,---,--ta . --, t-,-.--• ' ". -r- ii Is 11 '. r4L I li li $ I ii i : t I i 1 :., 'i P . _ CITY OF CHANHASSEN, - MINNESOTA ESTIMATE FOR PAYMENT ON CONTRACT Date October 30, 1978 Estimate No. 10 For period from Aug. 1st to0ct. 29, 7, \"" Name and Nature of Project Shore Acres Improvement Project II 77-2 Percent Completed After this Estimate 98 % ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 172,846.40 CHANGE ORDERS : - No. Date Approved ' Additions Deductions 650.00 • TOTAL ADDITIONS $ 0.00 SUB TOTAL $ 772,846.40- TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $ -650.0-0 CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE $ 172,196.40 TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE $ 183,746.83 MATERIALS STORED $ 0.00 TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED $ 183,7.46.8 LESS RETAINAGE 2 % $ 3,674.94 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE • $ 180,071.89 • LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 166,542.75 • �. EST. NO. 1 AMT 36,530.19 EST. NO. 6 AMT 2879.94 EST. NO. 2 AMT 39,221.64 EST. NO. 7 AMT 15,089.30 EST. NO. 3 AMT 25,052.76 EST. NO. 8 AMT 4,342.12 EST. NO. 4 AMT 9,836.10 EST. NO. 9 AMT 20,990.70 EST. NO. 5 AMT 12,600.00 EST. NO. AMT TOTAL ESTIMATES$ 166,542.75 AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE $ 13,529.14 Payment requested this 30 day of .Approved and recommended for payment October ,—I9 78 . this /3t day of d/ou , ,19 2? Crossings, Inc. ,, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. CONTRACTO PROJECT ENGINEER Ely: W. F. Shoe er BY: Illi1il .. William J. BYezinsky Address: P.O. Box 80 - Prior Lake, MN 55372 APPROVED: Approved by City Council this By: Mayor day of , 19 By City- Manager ST)TEMENT i • D C - B ANC ARD ENTERPRISES • SOD & SODDING • PLANTING SOIL • SNOW REMOVAL ■NRINNANNEMUgMABIR RWassslalaa■!aM mmusameamsameasmayammanstimmasom nammommmummammusgammesmmummems na! mumnsummaKSaasammatsaasssmas amumasumme 111 ammaimmemaamassm9592 ;t t 3725 W. 76th STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 DOSe June 30 1978 Sold City of Chanhassen l' 3 Yid ��Isis To P.O. Box 147 - 7610 Laredo Drive Et. il ?. ;7 ` Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 � . DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Work done at 7530 Hill Street 6/78 190 Square Yards Sod .55 $ 104.50 3 Cubic Yards Topsoil 5.50 $ 16.50 Stakes $ 7.50 18 Hours Labor 17.00 $ 306.00 2 Hours Tractor Time 27.00 $ 54.00 V 1 Hour Truck Time 27.00 $ 21..00 App ovsJ for Pc ymerr SCHELL & NAJMI, INC., EN INFER B r � Date '0 c/7 TAX ii:;ia'; .f7.C.. TOTAL $ 515.50 ;i`•y ' r „ 5 miew- STATEMENT - DO . B LANCH AR D ENTERPRISES • • SOD & SODDING • PLANTING SOIL • SNOW REMOVAL Ai!!i!!!!l tiVOI NIS*Waim ii iiiii!■!!!ii!!!Oilii!!i!!!i!i :!i��!!!,■��i!!!ii!■liiili!!i�!�!i!1!!• ih" 11:1111: 1i lii'/!!!ice! - i;:4;-` sIII j,.' 3725 W. 76th STREET Date June 30 1978 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 s__ °_,'•`t ri 1 ii •. f S IJ City of Chanhassen { ., t ; Ti' - i jt To P.O. Box 147 - 7610 Laredo Drive ` '-a �fi:-t!'� Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 _ ` DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Work done on birms on Highway # 101 __6/78 36 Square Yards Sod .55 $ 19.80 Stakes $ 1.50 7 Cubic Yards Topsoil 5.50 $ 38.50 3 Hours Labor 17.00 $ 51.00 1 Hour Tractor Time 27.00 $ 27.00 2 Hours Truck Time 27.00 . $ 54.00 Approved (or- Payment SC -LOP L & MADSON, INC., ENGINEERSl.A,� By ,iap i. Date - ' „, ,,......, TAX 4 f 4,it{fr ` TOTAL $ 191.80 jty ,11. OCT1978 X (jj- CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ESTIMATE FOR PAYMENT ON CONTRACT ` Date 9/15/78 Estimate No. 3 For period froml-1-78 to 9-15-78 Name and Nature of Project West 79th St. Watermain,Street,Curb & Gutter Imp. Proj. 77A Percent Completed After this Estimate 99 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 49,445.00 CHANGE ORDERS : No. Date Approved Additions Deductions 1 1-23-78 1655.00 TOTAL ADDITIONS $ 1655.00 SUB TOTAL $ 49,445.00 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $ - 0 - CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE $ 51,100.00 TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE $ 50,789.40 MATERIALS STORED $ -0- TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED $ 50,789.E+0 LESS RETAINAGE 10 $ 5,078.94 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE $ 45,7I0.4b LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 34,310.34 EST. NO. 1 AMT27,573.93 EST . NO. AMT EST. NO. 2 AMT 6,736.41 EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST . NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT TOTAL ESTIMATES$ 34,310 34 AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE $ 11,400.12 Payment requested thisiall day of Approved and recommended for payment r,' l? ti , 19 7 . this a.$7,, day of 7)UJoL. - , 19 7 P . S P f"G=��t. -7 7_ C-e1 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ONTRACTOR PROJECT ENGINEER. BY= .c Qll/ - BY: %/ .William Brezi,nsky Address : fp/ c APPROVED: Approved by City Council this By: Mayor day of L9 _- _ By _ City Manager f _ LASALLE, RUPPERT 8 ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS & CONSULTANTS PENNCREST BUILDING 8900 PENN AVENUE SOUTH C.E.L*SALLE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA :5:5.1,:31 TELEPHONE R.J. RUPPERT 612/884-9244 STATEMENT October 19, 1978 Invoice # 5180 Mr. Russell H. Larson Attorney at Law 1900 First National Bank Bldg. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Re: PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL SERVICES Victor Schmieg Property I - PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL SERVICES - including interviews with city officials regarding taxes, special assess- ments, zoning, age of buildings, etc. - interviews and conversations with Mr. Brezinsky, Engineer, and Mr. Larson, Attorney - field inspection of premises on 3 occasions and interview with Mr. Schmiege, owner - market data analysis of raw land (including interview with Mr. Burdick, Chanhassen Industrial Park) - market data analysis of improved properties (5 acres and residence) - preparation of exhibits - correlation of data and preparation of appraisal report - - 31.25 hours at $50 per hour = $1,562.50 LASALLE, RUPPERT & ASSOCIATES By R. J. Ruppert, SRA Metropolitan Animal Patrol Services, Inc. 506 1 1 th Avenue North • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411 SUPERINTEN ENT Ot. POLICE CITY OF AAsS 4P4.`) The followingis.j statement of services ren red by MAPS! from /0' / to JO- 3t - -74 3 Dogs Boarded Days ( _+�� . _ ) N�G —2.Dogs Boarded_Days ( P�s{re *• ) ._. __Dogs Boarded_Days ( _Dogs Boarded___Days ( -) • Dogs Boarded Days ( Dogs Boarded —Days ( ) flogs Boarded_Days ( Dogs Boarded Days ( _ ) __ Dogs Boarded —Days ( ) Dogs Boarded.—Days ( ) Dogs Boarded—Days ( Dogs Boarded_Days ( Dogs Boarded —Days ( ) Dogs Boarded _—Days ( _) Dogs Boarded —Days ( _ - ) Puppies Boarded. No charge except for euthanasia. Dead Dogs. No charge except for special calls. TOTAL .5 Dogs Boarded /6 days at 2000 , 30• o0 __Cats Boarded —Days ( ). Cats Boarded _Days ( Cats Boarded._Days ( Cats Boarded_Days ( ) Cats Boarded_Days ( ) Cats Boarded____Days ( ) Cats Boarded__Days ( ) _Cats Boarded .—Days ( ) Cats Boarded Days ( ) --Cats Boarded_ Days ( Kittens Boarded. No charge except for euthanasia. Dead Cats. No charge except for special calls. TOTAL _Cats Boarded _ days at S Euthanasia for. 4:9- Dogs at $ .�' S /C).U© Euthanasia for. Cats at $ S Weeks and or 6hours of Patrol, at S/0.75_ _ .$ W 1-11• CjO Stand-by Service Miscellaneous Creatures Boarded S Miscellaneous Creatures Euthanasia S off' -Special Calls at S/2•00 S �-- TOTAL S 343. 00 f ✓1. . '\. CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ESTIMATE FOR PAYMENT ON CONTRACT "*-..,'Date Octobdr 25,1978 Estimate No. 1 For period from 9-11 to 10-25-78 Name and Nature of Project Lotus Lake Estates Area San Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermain Sts. and curb and gutter. Percent Completed After this Estimate 44 % ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 258,576.00 CHANGE ORDERS : No. Date Approved Additions Deductions TOTAL ADDITIONS $ SUB TOTAL $_ 25E3,576„00 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $ CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE $ 258,576.00 TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE $ 114,575.50 MATERIALS STORED $ TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED $ .,575.50 LESS RETAINAGE 10 % $ 11,457.55 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE $ 103,117.95 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 0 EST. NO. AMT EST . NO. ANT EST . NO. ANT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT 1 EST . NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT TOTAL ESTIMATES$ 0 AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE $ 103,117.95 Payment requested this 25th day of Approved and recommended for payment October , 19 78 . this 274.4i day of Oc,4.0 ,,e. , 19 72 , Nodland Associates,Inc. SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. CONTRACTOR Box .338 PROJECT ENGINEER. Alexandria,� Minn. 56308 . By: C2k 4a6, By: c-0/J. Al Guenther W. J . Brez i nsky Address : APPROVED: Approved by City Council this By: Mayor day of .- By City Manager CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ESTIMATE FOR PAYMENT ON CONTRACT Date October 23, 1978 Estimate No.. 13 For period from S / /70 to 10/23/78 Name and Nature of Project Chanhassen-Fast J.ntii rake Sanitary Sewer & Watermain percent Completed After this Estimate 100 % • ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 679,269.00 CHANGE ORDERS : No . Date Approved Additions Deductions 1 5485.00 2 11762.20 _ TOTAL ADDITIONS $ 17,247.20 SUB TOTAL $ 713,763.20 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $ 0 CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE $ 713,763.20 TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE $ 763,930.54 * MATERIALS STORED $ 0 ^ TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED $ 763,930.54 LESS RETAINAGE 2 % . . . . $ 15,278.61 _ TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE $ 748,651.93 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 741 ,769:04 1 65,983.63 7 27,932.86 .4.. EST. NO. 2 AMT 164,284.76 EST . NO. 8 AMT 10.303.35 EST. NO. 3 AMT 188,429.37 EST. NO. 9 AMT 24.574.00 EST. NO . 4 AMT 47,794.44 EST. NO. 10 AMT 16.135.49 EST. NO. 5 ANT 39,623.17 EST . NO. 11 AMT 72,544.90 EST. NO. 6 ANT 67,902.30 EST. NO. 12 ANT 16,260.77 TOTAL ESTIMATES$ 741,769.04 AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE $ 6,882.89 Payment reques ed this 23 day of Approved and recommended for payment October 7 , 19 78 this 13 f day of AZ,V. , 19_712 . No / n Cern act om any 2 _ SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. CONTRACTOR! / PROJECT ENGINEER 7 /dy. / � U /P %� By: old, d&•8•r. ..4..PL_ ,,, ., / r Willia J. Br zinsky S : ox 650 Y. Hopkins, Minnesota APPROVED: Approved by Village Council this By: Mayor day of , 19 . By _ �- Village Administrator * This figure does not include the $60,236.74 claim subject to arbitration proceedings which have not been held as of this date. Ct , 4 t' ' 1 • e Professional Pools /A, P. O. Box 1099, 5645 Glen Ave. ' Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 Phone 612/933-6362 November 1, 1978 Mr . Donald Ashworth 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Technical Assistance Dear Don: Pursuant to our recent agreement, please be advised that I spent the following time working with the Chanhassen Planning Department: October 31 , 1978, meeting with Mark K. and Bob W. regarding Mandatory Planning Act, Planning Work Program and Chanhassen ' s relationship to neighboring communities, Metropolitan Council and higher units of government. 3 . 25 hrs. $65 . 00 Don, please have Kay issue this check to me. Thank you. inc el , r)3\ 12345 Bruce Pankonin /�;/_ / 5 __ 11 3, c ;) NOV19 8 b\ creRECEnTED ,VILLAGE Ofi '1'ANHASSEN, ;j MINN. Cam` �V, / • COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION &SERVICE O SWIMMING POOL DESIGN & MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS f WILLIAM D.SCHOELL CA'RLISLE MAOSON JACK T.VOSLER JAMES R.ORR ~,•� '-_ HAROLD E.DAHLIN €10� - . LARRY L.HANSON _ SCHOELL 8, MADSON, INC. �RAYMONDJ.JACKSON . .... WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS JACK E.GILL "- 'r, RODNEY B. GORDON "tr- l • THEODORE O. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND (612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E. ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING October 27 , 1978 - r To: City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Administrator Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Miscellaneous engineering services, September 16 , 1978 - October 15 , 1978: No. 930. Burdick Park. Staking center line of road, stake curb 0 and gutter, mark grade; inspection; supervision. 4p9 3-man survey party 12% hrs. g $42.00 $ 514.50 Inspection 10 hrs. @ 13.65 136.50 Inspection 6 hrs. ® 30.00 180.00 Supervision 5 hrs. ® 21.00 105.00 $ 936.00 Kurvers assessment appeal - review and prepare \„. 72-/ for trial. 5p7' Registered Engineer 13 hrs. g $21.00 273.00 015- Miscellaneous services by Registered Engineer: No. 923, Chaparrell - Review sketch plan of Outlots B and C; attend meeting. 3 hrs. No. 807-831 , Egqum - Assessment split. 1 hr. 7)-4/ -Cleve?and subdivision - Assessment ,split.__ _ _ _ 1 hr. Criteria , Inc. - Sketch plan review. ✓ 1 hr. f/O Somers subdivision - Review. �1 yhr. -0 , Higcins assessment review. 2 hrs.: 9 a -------- _.. .--..-- , • NOT ,. c.„i'7_ Meyer Subdivision - review preliminary plat. 1 hr. /"Ersbo - sketch plan review. r JA 1 hr. .,` Near Mountain property - meeting. /i 2 hrs. 13 hrs✓. C��2��h, � , ._� .___ ..__._._ g $21.00 273.00 �� =\ ��' ':c �" Total Miscellaneous $1,482_00 �r rs �.� Ric`f,��0 j `c;-' VILLAG. op `-U! �`: CHANI-IASS€N Col N &v Order No. 7120 WILLIAM D.SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T.VOSLER JAMES R.ORR iAROLD E.DAHLIN -tARRYL.HANSON SCHOELL $. MADSON, INC. RAYMOND J.JACKSON ': • WILLIAM J.BREZINSKY ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS JACK E.GILL - RODNEY B. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND (612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E.ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON. SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON. TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING October 25 , 1978 Mr. Allen Gray 8200 Norrnandale Boulevard, Suite 323 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437 June 21, 1978 - October 15 , 1978. Engineering services in connection with Sunny Slope Addition including preparation of plans and specifications, field survey for road alignment and profiles; assist with bid opening; stake for utility construction and inspect installation of utilities. Plans and Specifications. 3-man survey party 3 hrs. @ $52.00 $ 156.00 4-man survey party 6 hrs. @ 60.00 360.00 Surveyor, in office 1 hr. @ 20.00 20.00 Drafting 6 hrs. @ 8.45 50.70 Drafting 42 hrs. @ 10.40 46.80 Drafting 632 hrs. @ 12.61 800.74 Engineering 2 hrs. ® 22.00 44.00 Registered Engineer 19 hrs. @ 27.00 513.00 $1 , 991.24 Construction Staking, Inspection and Supervision. 2-man survey party 151/2 hrs. @ $42.00 $ 651.00 3-man survey party 10 hrs. @ 52.00 520.00 Inspection 5 hrs. @ 12.61 63.05 Inspection 152 hrs. @ 13.65 211.58 Inspection 21 hrs. ? 17.94 376.74 Inspection 9 hrs. @ 30.00 270.00 Registered Engineer 8 hrs. @ 27.00 216.00 $2 , 308. 37 Total to Date $4, 299,61 .172 00 g/,`2} Order No. 10094 WI.LLIAM D.SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T.VOSLER JAMES R.ORR --ter HAROLD E.DAHLIN LARRY L.HANSON - SCHOELL SQL MADSON, INC. RAYMOND J.JACKSON _ '` WILLIAMJ.BREZINSKY r' ei ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS JACK E.GILL ROONEY B. GORDON }• 4 THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND (6121 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E.ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON. SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING November 2 , 1978 City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Subject: (Kilpn Gra Sunnys ope Addition Gentlemen: Enclosed is our billing for engineering services on the subject project. According to the Development Contract this bill is to be paid out of the money Mr. Gray placed in escrow with the City. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC . WJBrezinsky:esg enclosure �jfj i a , I e Kt f_.:r f{:.'�'. SCHOELL & MADSON INC. :"44 ; • c .d r� � ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 • PHONE 938-7601 4g 7 TO City of Chanhassen 't c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Administrator ! Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 ORDER NO. 9383 DATE Oct. 27 , 1978 BILLS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF STATEMENT PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN February 21, 1978 - August 8, 1978. Surveying services in connection with the final plat of Chanhassen Lakes Business Park including research, computations, boundary survey and preparation of property descriptions; stake streets for viewing; set proposed setback elevation; stake revised street alignment; take cross-sections; furnish blueprinting. $8,096.05 ORDER NO. 9883 •'z '•�:ki _ ,r' SCHOELL 8: MADSON•INC. ' r.r. tf 4- 4 L • • \(c SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. - t t _ i }f' ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS ; 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 • PHONE 938-7601 � N,.-' 4; ' TO City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Administrator Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 ORDER NO. 10027 DATE Oct. 27, 1978 BILLS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF STATEMENT PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN TROLLS GLEN September 16 , 1978 - October 15 , 1978. Staking and inspection. 3-man survey party 17 hrs. @ $42.00 $714.00 Surveyor, in office 2 hrs. @ 18.00 36.00 Inspection 52 hrs. ® 13.65 75.08 inspection 1 hr. @ 30.00 30.00 • Supervision 1 hr. @ 21.00 21.00 0° $876.08 ORDER NO. 10027 -777-- SCHOELL 8. MADSON,INC. ! a i';. 3 , iFf;; '11tc, try 1 i a a,-- I ','si-:ill) ,!' I .� SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. .. c ‘,.; f ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS 50 NINTH AVENUE (SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 • PHONE 938-7601 TO City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Administrator Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 ORDER NO. 19174 DATE Oct. 27, 1978 BILLS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF STATEMENT PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN CHASKA ROAD WATERMAIN Engineering services in connection with the preparation of a feasibility study for this project. Drafting 42 hrs. ® $12.00 $ 54.00 Registered Engineer 4 hrs. ® 21.00 84.00 $138.00 Preparation of plans and specifications. 3.9% of low bid of $8 ,438.00 329.08 $467.08 ORDER N {t'�;f' f.. E o. 10174 ti SCHOELL & MADSON,INC. Tll} It; s .!I S 1 4 I{i C Ik' ' ? / , . • i i 4t ;isi i 1,..------___. SCHOELL 81. MADSON. INC. :. i >ry i 4 fit ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS +: :Il '1�„ ice: .o!' .-' I 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 • PHONE 938-7601 S i { TO City of Chanhassen 1 c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Administrator Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 F s { 1 ORDER NO. 8379 DATE Oct. 27, 1978 1 BILLS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF STATEMENT PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN iMSAS-101 L September 16 - October 15 , 1978. Staking and inspection. 3-man survey party 691/2 hrs. P $42.00 $2 ,919.00 i Surveyor, in office 71/2 hrs. ® 18.00 135.00 t Inspection 741/2 hrs. © 13.65 1,016.93 t Inspection 23 hrs. @ 30.00 690.00 t k $4,760.93 r S . i / 1 /1 1 li ...- 3 _-- ,_/75 F - - 1-1 ORDER NO. .8379 `` SCHOELL & MADSON,INC. ''';1'. / . : ,? '. ��; � f / -,. , .• 1 i t i sus 1- tad f. SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. �e ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS wt./ • • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 • PHONE 938-7601 TO City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Administrator Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 ORDER NO. 8886 DATE Oct. 27 , 1978 BILLS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF STATEMENT PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN East Lotus Lake September 16 - October 15 , 1978. Staking and inspection. 2-man survey party 3 hrs. @ $30.00 $ 90.00 3-man survey party 1 hr. 42.00 42.00 Surveyor, in office 3/4 hr. @ 18.00 13.50 Inspection 12 hrs. 13.65 163.80 $309. 30 Err. flw�w ORDER NO. 8886 SCHOELL 8. MADSON,INC. E y .t I( f 1v fC yf 1 l / • • \(\ ' i-1 `ct,- ji, '; ‘ ' t) -,1,i_ SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. `' ' ! qW ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS .,h ai �� wjl'i , 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH •• HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 •• PHONE 938-7601 1 i t TO City of Chanhassen { c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Administrator Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 s 4 DATE Oct. 27 , 1978 ! ORDER NO. 999 BILLS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF STATEMENT PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN 1 ,. LOTUS LAKE ESTATES I September 25 , 1978 - October 15 , 1978. Staking and 1 \1-- inspection. 2-man survey party 37 hrs. 0 $30.00 $1 ,110.00 1 3-man survey party 431/2 hrs. @ $42.00 1 ,827.00 Surveyor , in office 31/2 hrs. @ $18.00 63.00 Inspection 9 hrs. @ $12.61 113.49 Inspection 441/2 hrs. @ $13.65 607.43 f. Inspection _37 hrs. @ $17.94 663.78 Inspection 2 hrs. 0 $30.00 60.00 $4,444.70 arr. j 1/-z--:V, - ORDER NO. 9994 6 T 'p i ; 3f. rSCHOELL & MADSON,INC. ' 5%,'. t __ , r i 111.1! t ti 1 H 1 E 1 S / • • t J ill SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. • ; ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS $ : 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 • PHONE 938-7601 TO City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth , Administrator Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 ORDER NO. 9995 DATE Oct. 27 , 1978 BILLS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF STATEMENT PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN HIGHWAY 5 FRONTAGE ROAD September 26 , 1978 - October 16, 1978. Staking and inspection. 2-man survey party 5 hrs. @ $30.00 $ 150.00 3-man survey party 47 hrs. © 42.00 1 , 974.00 Surveyor, in office 2 hrs. ® 18.00 36.00 Inspection 1 hr. @ 12.61 12.61 Inspection 401 hrs. @ 13.65 552.83 Inspection 22 hrs. •© 17.94 394.68 Inspection 13 hrs. © 30.00 390.00 $3, 510.12 F ORDER NO. 9995 `1, f j r SCHOELL & MADSON,INC. -Pi , / STATEMENT ',... SOLIDIFICATION, INC. ...._ t. 620 COTTONWOOD LANE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 .‘ - ....,,-tii-li, MONTHLY STATEMENT FOR DATE October 1, 1978 • t -;: flyi) City of Chanhassen rI- c. - -0 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 AMT.REMITTED $ PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN THIS STUB WITH REMITTANCE CHARGES CREDIT BALANCE 8-11-78 Invoice 2319 1888.00 + service charge 18.88 1906.88 AoDrova-i ror Pa'jr-lent Si-GEIL ,t)..; WX)S01, iC., EMINEERS \.-- By .W.,?9:-....4..4ifrtmH, Dcite _f /'6/.21'. A gvoiI - P,.......7, 4.,>, ,...,'XL A ......, ., '..- .N.: -"."..14 4..........11 e....... -: ;.1..,:f VP , •7 t:) ---, ....-•et--.z. t. V,I.._ ' 'C'....3 r.•, ...,.. \:,-- 41;NN. ".' . (j—..., -0,..:/ ....„,..- , 4". : 4...::..h- ,r; kk, i• ti:1 ..Avt.fc, IP. i ilivf.P*)ur:,"..,":"G'V 'Waft-4 *tsa , A'.' •k -,4Si'. \-- • • • -\)(CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ESTIMATE FOR PAYMENT ON CONTRACT Date 10/26/78 Estimate No. 5 For period from 9/26/78 to 10/26/78 Name and Nature of Project ERIE AVENUE - STREET & DRAINAGE PROJECT 75-11 Percent Completed After this Estimate 99 % ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 91,693.00 CHANGE ORDERS : No. Date Approved — Additions Deductions 1 b/1/77 : NONE NONE 2 7/21/77 900.00 _ SEE PAGE 2 TOTAL ADDITIONS $ 10,801.56 SUB TOTAL $TL`2,494.5b TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $ NONE CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE $ TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE $ 170,552.78 MATERIALS STORED $ -0- TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED $T 170,552.78 LESS RETAINAGE � $ 8,527.63 - TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE $^162,025.15 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 147,061.74 EST. NO. 1 AMT 77,761.89 EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. 2 AMT 33,941.20 EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. 3 AMT 15,334.07 EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. 4 ANT 20,024.58 EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. ANT TOTAL ESTIMATES$ 147,061.74 AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE $ 14,963.41 Payment requested this 27TH day of Approved and recommended for payment OCTOBER , 19 78 . this 3011% day of o be 499, WEST SUBURBAN UTILITY CONTRACTORS, INC. SCHOELL & MADSON , INC. CONTRACTOR PROJECT ENGIf�NEER. By��. nn2:4-17t7, �'V By :^ ��.e:i 4;s1X> i� SACK D. VAN REMORTEL, PRESIDENT William J. Brezi .-y Address : 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 APPROVED: Approved by City Council this By: Mayor day of 19 By City Manager }" CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ESTIMATE FOR PAYMENT ON CONTRACT Date 10/26/78 Estimate No. 2 For period from q/23/78 to 10/25/78 Name and Nature of Project GRADING & AGGREGATE BASE - MSAS 194-101-02 Percent Completed After this Estimate 66 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 256,285.55 CHANGE ORDERS : No. Date Approved — Additions Deductions TOTAL ADDITIONS $ SUB TOTAL $ TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $ CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE $ 256,285.55 TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE $ 170,668.40 MATERIALS STORED $ -0- TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED $ 170,668.40 LESS RETAINAGE 10 $ $ 17,066.84 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE $ 153,601.56 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $ 44,139.00 EST. NO. 1 AMT 44, 139.00 EST . NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. ANT EST. NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT EST . NO. AMT EST. NO. AMT TOTAL ESTIMATES$ 44, 139.00 AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE $ 109.462.56 Payment requested this 27TH day of approved and recommended for payment OCTOBER , 19 78 this3Mh day of 00-I-o66,/-. , 197g WEST SUBURBAN UTILITY CONTRACTORS, INC. SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. CONTRACTOR PROJECT ENGINEER By: ACK D. VAN REMORTEL, PRESIDENT William , Brezin y Address.: 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 APPROVED: Approved by City Council this By: Mayor day of 19 By City Manager { • _` STATEMENT SKYLINE FENCE, Route 5 - Box 183D Buffalo, Minn. 55313 LANDSCAPING & 7 miles west of Rockford on Hwy. 55 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO. (612) 477-5558 or 682-3539 7-1\,7 D 3 CT 4 1976 . DATE ITEM �� AMOUNT (.72 / Cf % S, C, 61,4-- Z /A// % ry EA) v7y -- ; 'cc io . .j o r5a, . % 7/1 /¢uc' . SCE L.'L ti :1� r BY Date !/ 'I TOTAL r / ' .. • i. _ . STATEMENT �SeRPDiaer 13,�a7� , FILE COP\ t ,,� .: City of Chanhassen ! > ,`' .t EtIa Town Nall - Box 147 s' .` ' ` Chanhassen, MN 55317 > `''�` r'' • • IN ACCOUNT WITH Loc. No. 4-24-63-15-C ' '•t', *; THE MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE W. O. No . 9508 "_______ Jordan, Minnesota 55352 492-2313 AMOUNT $ 284 ,52 PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION WITH PAYMENT 11 I1 I Service rendered 9/6/78 II - I i 1 Labor for installing wiri • 11 _ 1 for lift Station # 18 . 1 . . . . I1 $2$4.62 I II 1 11 I _ ---- - - t.f, •I_, ' - it '�..-•- I411 _ . ' r+ ,` terry� 11 i ., / el, II Thank you, I ii --- I it i 1 - --- — p• _ 1 II 1 _ r s i., j II II " 5 ..A!i, j- !; II I - ''k . ;t > �, ��. j1 OFFICE COPY ' ` L i i mod' 2 FIRE • MARSHAL'S REPORT July, 1978 3 1 hour Phone Calls 6 3 hours Inspections 10 2 hours Burning Permits 14 1 hour Micro Wave Oven Check 19 1 hour Fire Prevention Week 25 2 hours Burning Permits August, 1978 3 2 hours Inspections 7 12 hours Tot Finder Program 14 12 hours Microwave Oven Check . 21 2 hours Burning Permits 25 1 hour Burning Permits September, 1978 6 lhour Misc. Work 12 2 hours Inspection & Burning Permi 10 2 hours Planning Fire Pr@vention Week 13 1 hour Planning Fire Prevention Week 25 12 hours Planning Fire Prevention Week 28 1 hour Planning Fire Prevention Week OFF: 474-3979 SOUTHWEST PLUMBING & HEATING CO. RES : 474-9448 7606 Erie Avenue Chanhassen, Minn. 55317 October 18, 1978 BILLING ADDRESS : JOB ADDRESS : City of Chanhassen Instant Web Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Invoice ; 1029 STATEMENT PRICE TOTAL BID PRICE ON PROJECT : EXTRAS TO CONTRACT: Dug up the water main and back filled on 10/7/78 4 hrs . on Saturday 55. 00 $220 . 00 I TOTAL ON EXTRAS : f1. ''k TOTAL BILL: $220 . 00 4yO, 9>, vt to �'� 0.0 , • \Pr, .bkvt+ • CITY OF CHANHASSEN A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 11-20-78 PAGE 1 r: . K.O H M A N _. V i C.T 0 P_____: _ _ _.__ .... .._..,: _ ...__.. , .. ,_.._. ,F i D.. _ I N C 0 M ! TAX P A Y 5! ANO—MINK INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—P.E.R.A. PAYABLE __ ...__. AND-WIS,CONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP�_______.__._�w _-_._..w.. i AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG. s..___ ___O.i01.4,1.___...___:.__ ._...3,95.•. CHAS-TEK_SYLVESTER u. ... _.:_- ._ __.' ...._ .F•I,oG.A._PAYABL.E AND —FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE ;<< AND—MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE s AND-P.-E_.-R.A. PAYABL_E_._.. ,.? AND—WISCONSIN E.MPLO`YERS GRP AND —SALARIES + WAGES, REG. 427.50 BROSEE HAROLD F.I.C.A. PAYABLE i 010142 AND—FEO. INCOME. TAX PAYABLE AND—MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-°P.E.R.A. PAYABLE AND-WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GYP AND —SALARIES + WAGES, REG. L° 010143 399.15 GREGORY DALE F.I.C.A. PAYABLE AND —FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE .-----__ _----_. __--_ __.._ .__._.._ HND--MINN INCOME 'TAX PAYABLE AND—P,E,R.A. PAYABLE -AND—WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP ;i .ANO-SALARIES�+. WAGES, REG., iA. i i T`j 010144 310.92 MITCHELL DOUGLAS F,I.C.A. PAYABLE ;ITY OF CHANHASSEN A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 11-20-78 PAGE 2 Z._M A. N T.� _ AND -FED. INCOMME TAX PAYABLE -.AND-P:.E.R.A. PAYABLE AND -SALARIES + WAGES, R.EG, _ - __..-.__ u1t145 437.74 BOUCHER, GERALD F.I,C.A,< PAYABLE AND -EEO.; INCOME TAX PAYABLE INCOME uT A X_ .„ P A Y A _8 AND-P.E.R.A, PAYABLE AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG. 010146 :46.99 BREHM CURTIS F.I.:C.A. PAYABLE< -- - AND -FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE. - - — - ::_ :.AND-MIIN INCO*i yTAX F'rAYABL_ AND-P,E.R,A. PAYABL AND -SALARIES + WAGES: REG, 010i47 313.28 ENGELHARDT KAREN- AND-FED, INCOME TAX PAYABLE ANO-MINN INCOME 'TAX PAYABLE AND-P.y.,R.A,. PAYABLE AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG. 010148 370.88 KLTNGELHUTZ KAY FED,... INCOME TAX 'PAYABLE _-- AND—MINN INCOME 'TAX 'PAYABLE _.__.._. AND-P,rE*R.A. PAYABLE AND—WISCOlVSI"d�EMf'LOYERS GRP AND —SALARIES + WAGES, REG, CITY OF CHANHASSEN A C C G LI N T S P, A Y A 8 L E DATE 21-20-78 PAGE 3 U R 0 S _,..P .P -GERALD._.. F.-I•..C_•A,®PAY,A:BL __ trAND—FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—P.E,R.A. PAYABLE _ --..ANO—SALARIES + WAGES, PR.EG.s 355,33 NAIBEL ROBECT E,I.CmA.;-PAYA-BL- AND —FED, INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—P.E.R,A.. PAYABLE AND —SALARIES WAGES, 7EG. _______ _iI.1.t_15.1�_.__.._. +w.9.•6 _.__. _..'CALLANAN FRANCI:S._.. _ .. 'r_._._._.F,I.C_._A.PAYABLE AND —FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE AN0-MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—P.E.R.A. PAYABLE _ — - - - — — - - - — 'AND -SAL ARIESA}. WAR WAGES, EG: 0if�i52 __..__._.._..__ _..__._._ __.___..-__.._ 750,90 ..�..._._..._.�.._..__.._�.___ ASHWORTH DONALtD ._.._�__.___-.__.__.___..�__`___.......•.. FED. INCOME TAX PAYABL.E,.�_ .� AND—MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—P.E.R.A. PAYABLE AND—WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP 'AND —SALARIES, + WAGES , ;R EG � T' tD1D153 259,42 KA LYNN PEOERSON F.I,C.A. PAYABLE .__...... _.,_..__. AND—FEO. INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—P.E.R.A. PAYABLE CITY OF CHANHASSEN A C.C<0 LI N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 11-20-78 PAGE 4 0nH C_K ` d_ _A, _.M_. Q_._U t�l__T __ C _ t�4_I.� i�! A N T. _. ..._._ .. _.a m v p U—R- p U S E. _ AND —SALARIES + WAGES, REG. 010154�^ .Cc VOIDED CHECK 4MISC4CONTRACT� SVCSk�y N D RU N G __._._F •_ I_y.0 •_a_•.._. PAYABLE AND -FED,. INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-,MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP�� AND -SALARIES t WAGES, REG. ROBERT MARK COEGLER F.I.C.A. PAYAi3L1 AND -FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE .AND-MINN INCOME ._ TAX PAYABLE AND-P.E.R.A. PAYABLE _ AND —SALARIES t WAGESs REG. C10157 125.1030 HOBBS WALTER SALARIES } WAGES9 REGm' ?_ 9.5_.00._..M N_EVE,AUX_ JOHN --: _....._...w..' _ _...._SALARIES + WAGES,�.REG. 010159 95.00 GEVING DALE SALARIES + WAGES, REG. 95. PEARSOi� W .SALARIES + WAGEs, !REG. 161-- _.__._._. 95.06_-WARITZ NICK_;._..._ _.::, w.._.: _._.... .. _..SALAR_IESt WAGES,. REG. -'010162 32.00 PROCESS DYNAMICS FEES, SERVICE To cover costs of En .._� _ --t1ISC program from 6/30f 7f 010163 .00 VOIDED CHECK CONTfACT SVG5_employees.___ _ i.u-1n4�.:: _ .._: i*_8u .CHANHASS'EN PHARMACY' ._._ _..__._ MAINyTENANCE MATERIALS OiQ165 15.00 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC FEES, SERVICE To analyze 3 sample: tion system for 5tat 010166 32.22 ITASCA EQUIPMENT +CO SUPPLIES,EQUIPT.MENT ��- — - - - -- 10_167_ ._,___._ ____..171.9�_..._ ._m�??�j��__�'�ODUCTS CO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS Pipe, Short Bend, Lc o1317o 379.41 FRONTIER LUMBER MAINTENANCE MATERIALS AND-SUPP.LZES,` OFFI_CE_._ — :AND -SUPPLIES, EQUIPTMENT AND -SMALL TOOLS + EQUIP. 010171 240.00 OPFER: NANCY SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. _E R N S T-__ J — - �; _._ .... a_ ..w_..__.. —_.. _. __.:SALARIES + W A G E S._x_ TEMP ....—. . 010173 26.25 HELiENDRUNG, MIKE SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. CITY OF CHANHASSEN A C O,U N T-S P A Y A B L E DATE 11-20-78 PAGE 5 DiC182 51. u NORTHWESTERN,6ELL TEL-PHONE __... O_iQ2$3_._::._ 19.90___._.. CULLIGAh1. ._.._,� ., .._W._ µUTILITIES AYABLE_,_.,___..__:___ _ INCOME TAX PAYABLE INCOME TAX PAYABLE INCOME INCOME TAX PAYABLE TAX PAYABLE ARL_F Softener tankservice from 10/01 t�iu18 183.96 POSTMASTER POSTAGE Mailing of 2,190 newsletters c i0185 45C�.0 MASON ROBERT, BLOR. REFUNDS + RE-INBURSE. Refund of escrow fund 810185 29.Q9 MINN SOTA GAS COMPANY UTILITIES 010187 2.60 MN VALLEY ELECT CO-OP UTILITIES _. __-.__.__ _ .. __.. _ ____.__-_. 1C1$8 51.65 ___._ ___ _.__.__ __. , . _____ _ .. UNITED T-LE"PHONE TELEPHONE' 010191 545,477.0E STATE BANK OF CHANHASSEN INVESTMENTS PURCHASED 010192 433.97 KOHMAN VICTOR FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE ONSIN EMPEOYEPS GRP. RIES + WAGES, REG.` PAYABLE INCOME TAX PAYABLE INCOME TAX PAYABLE ERS GRP use$ V ! i C �,.. r .F°g^•Kr "rr�arc'r+w+:.., ..ter+wren'�er`i�vfi"i.�"..'•a.........�.�"�."\.��.5..,:�.y,.n�•.,,r....�.:,„��,,..�,._.._, CITY OF.CHANHASSEN A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 11-20-78 PAGE 8 P U _R P 0 .S E AND—P.E.R.A, PA`fABLE AND WISCONSIN;_EPi DYER GRp AND —SALARIES + WAGES, REG. F_.i.C..,A. ,PAYA:BLE AND —FED, IR 6ME TAX PAYABLE. AND—MINN 'INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND - P, �.. R A_* . P A Y AB LE___ AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG. GERALD.___..___...._._..___.___...___.._._...F�.I.•.•A. _PAYABLE _.�r_.!31f1197.___..._------ _-.. _437 AN® -FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE ANfl r oE3�i+A. PAYABLE AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG. 3,46 - 9B BR �H.M C URT I S_.---_ ._ F.I.C.A. PAYABLE..... _ ..___.._ ._._.... AND -FED. INCOME :,TAX. PAYABLE AND-MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND -P.E.R.A. PAYABLE _�.-_--_ AND —SALARIES + WAGES, REG G1Q199 26 ENGELHARBT KAREN ._ F.I.C.A. .._._.._.._ rtPAYABLE _313 AND —FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND —MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-?.E..A.`PAYA3i.E�' _....,_. ._.. _ _...: _ __,.... _ .,.. _._. AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG. iQZJO 370.88 KLINGELHUTZ KAY FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE CITY OF-CHANHASSEN A C C_0 U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 11-20-78 PAGE 9 M .0 _..tJ . N,__ P _ . U _ + AND-MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE _AND'p:. E_-__A =_ _. AND-WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG. _ __ __ 492.58 __-- -._ _._ _ _.__._____ SCHL_NK .. _._ n.. _ _ _ _..._,___ _ _ _ ____ GERALD __.. - . F.I,G,A. PAYABLE 0102i1 AND-E.D._:INCOMIE TAX PAYABLE AND-MINN INCOME TAX v PAYABLE -AND-P.E.R.A, PAYABLE AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG, 010202 355.33 F.I,C.A, PAYABLE WAIBEL, ROBERT AND -FED, INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-MINN ` INCOME w TAX PEA Y A B i__E AND-P.E.R.A. PAYABLE AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG. ^010203 w - 4-09.60_ - CALLAHAN, FRANCISA� - - P,I 0'.A-, PAYABLi AND-F'ED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-,iINN 'INCOME TAX PAYABi E AND-P,E.R,A, PAYABLE AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG. 010204 750.9f0 ASHWORTH DONALD FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-.P.F.R.A. PAYABLE _ ---..._.,.AND- W-I S C ON SvI}N~ EMPLOYERS GRP AND -SALARIES + WAGES, REG. CITY OF CHANHASSEN A C C O U N T S P A Y A 8 L E DATE ii-20-78 PAGE iA R P 0 S r. �._P_.._U _ A, ,PA YA_S.L AND —FED.. INCOME TAX PAYABLE ACID—MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE - - ANC_-P.•_E.�,a,A,,._PAYABLE AND —SALARIES +^ WAGES PEG ,....... 010207 364.15 BILL HELLENDRUNG F.I.C.A. PAYABLE - _._.AND-FED*INCOME TAX PAYAS ,E AND-MINN `INCOME TAX PAYAOIL c AND—P.E.R.As PAYABLE AND-WISCONSI,N� EMPLOYERS ,GRP AND -SALARIES } WAGES, REG. _...1.8 8_a 6_5 _ M -- U W I 5 S E N M A R Y JEAN .._ .. _.,..__. ._ _._.F E D s. INCOME TAX_ PAYABLE ANO-MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND -SALARIES + WAGES, 'TEMP. 010209 " 00 OPFER, NANCY SALARIE.S + WAGE TEMP. _._0 i_0 2.l. ...__ ..__ _:. _ .1.2.8_0. 0.8 _E R N S T J._F _.. .__ _.____..._. _ _ ..._ SALARIES +; WAGES, TEMP' ! 010211 132.92 SILL HELLENDRUNG Ft I.C.A. ,PAYABLE AND PEU4 INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND—P.E.R.A. PAYABLE AND —OVERTIME, REGULAR 010212 3_03a47 BOUCHERZ, , GERALD Flo I.C..A. 'PAYABLE AND 'FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE CITY OF CHANHASSEN A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 11-20-78 PAGE 11 ?.__ AND-MINN 'INCOME TAX PAYABLE _._..: ,.... AND-P_•E...,R.A.-PAYABL. ...:. AND -OVERTIME, REGULAR ..--------- -_$.7..5.i1_....... .._,_N_ELL_NQRUNG,.._rMI.KE _.._SALARI..ES_+ WAGES. TEM_P_• --.n ___.� _,�_ _.,� 1 214 485.i9 ROBERT MARK KOEGLE E.I.C.A. PAYABLE AND -FED. INCOME AND-MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE AND-P.E.R.A. PAYABLE AN,D SALAR_I,ES. + WAGES:: 110215 40.01 WRASE HENRY SALARIES + WAGES, ;TEMP. 010216 2,640.615 STATE BANK OF CHANHASSEN FED. INCOME TAX PAYABLE 1,._3.36_.87_ MINN _COMM qOF REVENUE_ _.w MINN INCOME TAX PAYABLE 010218 21157.8i STATE TREASURER p.E.JR.A. PAYABLE ANO CONTRIB.,YP_c_ETIRE.=.. 010219 608.62 MINN COMM OF REVENUE REMITT TO OTHER AGENCIES 80 573, 634.26 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING — -- I-ol IT Ur UMA}VI'AZ)ZJ t]N AUUUUNJIJ Y A T A U L L UA i L 11-ZO-7b PAGE 12 P U R P 0 S L�_0_6,8_6_4.. w __ .... _.. _.;'�.S-. v_8.._ A _ _�G _i .2_A. LING . - PRI J_T I G_ A.tt D__P_tl 006865 5,00 AIR COMM REP. + MAINT.I EQUIPT. 005866 320.50 AKINS FIRE EQUIP CO SUPPLIESs EQUIPTMENT Blaze orange gloves spiders, service bo ..47.5 M.__._.e:.AMEPIC,c N_..N_A.T_ R... ,'._ . .Pi lINTING AND_..,PUB.L- - ANC -SUBSCRIPT. + MEMBERSHIPS ,_._.._.M_0C_68.68_._ _--___--------- _.. _21..65 AND-RSONEARL SIGNS_ AND S,IGNAI.,S.______.______,__ ._r. _._.__..._--_.. ____._..... dead end sign. 006869 8.50 ARMOR SAFE CO SUPPLIES, OFFICE 006870 6.50 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES, EQUIPTME.NT 71--__-_._.._..__._.. _1.5G,00 BENTZ CONSTRUCTION INC R NTAL_� EQUIPTM'NT Labor tranching, ini _- _ _ ._ .. _..__ _. _-=-.—__-- and -I-roquois 0t» 6872 1411 .00 BREHM MARY FcES 9 SERVICE_ Cleaning of City Ha: G06873 38.10 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC OTH � CONTT COSTS and November -5th - -w- ____f..._0_ 6.8741_4_•_`_'_._.._.___._8_ULLS Y GLASS REPAIP.. .__ _._ SUPPLIES, EtQUIPTMENT 006875 262.50 CALLAHAN, FRANCIS TRAVEL + 'TRAINING, 006876 1, 702.44 CARGILL SALT` DEPARTMENT........_. MAI,�7'LNANCE MATEfZ� IALS - G� 6877._. ... .-__..._7_0 •C CAFLSON PUBLIC SERVICE OTHER COSST COSTS See attached copy. 006878 158.54 CARvE.R COUNTY HERALD PRINTING AND PUBLISHING AND OTHER COSTT COSTS 006879 997.25 CARVER COUNTY INS CO FEES, SERVICE Additional workmens AND-WORKM NS COMP. notary stamp and st< On 6880 5.C.0 CARVER COUNTY CLERK OF SUBSCRIPT. + MEMBERSHIDS 006881 35.82 CARVER COUNTY TR£ASURcR MAINTENANCE MATERIALS AND -PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 006882 4,00 CENEX MOTOR FUELS + LUBRICANTS 3 - - 29347.».G.. ' CHAP! FIRE RELIEF.. SALARIES + WAGES, :_REG, Salary for firemen _ASSN _...: �,nuary 1,- 97 -to-, V1IY ter UHANHASSLN A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 11-20-78 PAGE 13 P._ U _ R P... _.0 . S ,__...58:..15_...__ FUG-LS,__UB.S.CAN.,S... CJ 6885 173.14 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS SUPPL I_S, EQUIPTMENT _..... __4._._ __....-. ANC_. SMA LL i OOLSN� EQUIP P. 880886 6,345.ZJ CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPT SALARIES WAGES, 17 Pay to members for tr< 006887 11.78 CHANHASSEN PHARMACYEQUIPTMENT �._ AND -SUPPLIES, OFFICE 006888 54.40 CHAPIN PUBLISHING :OTHER C0;3ST COSTS mCH_ASKA AUTO PARTS INC_�SUPPLIS: tQUIFTMNT of 30 689G 112.col CITY VIEW PLBG t HTG REP. + MAINT., EQUIPT. nozzle, oil filter, tx C6891 13, 529.14 CROSSINGS INC "AWARDED CONTT CONTRACTS See `attached copy. _0_6$ 9 2... ;._ _ _ 355e5r7 .-..___CALF OFFICE------ ES w OrFIC� EQUIPTMENT Olivetti Electronic Ca 06893 355.81 BALES OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES, OFFICE AND SUPPLIES, EQUIPTMENT ANO-OFFICE EQUIPTMENT - 8689 _....__. __._ 707.30 - 4DOC BLANyCHARD ENTERPRISE _._. w OTHER COSTT COSTS - _.._..__ _._._ _... �w See attached copies. 0,06895 70.0G EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CLEANING + WASTE REMOVAL 8G58�36 .___._..__. 41.47 ..._- _ Ei3UCATIONAL AIDS OF TRAVEL +"'TRAINING -� ..v46,_79 EINICKE „V W ASSOCIATES_.._ OFFICE 006898 102.81 FEED RITE CONTROL CHEMICALS 006899 15.Z,0 FIRE INSTRUCTORS `ASSOC M TRAVEL } TRAINING 6.9.GQy :._ _. 46e92: ,-,-.,FLAHrRTY EQUIPMENT: �- _..SUPPLIS, EQUIPTMrNTw_. 0016901 4?.50 FLYING CLOUD CLEANING + WASTE. REMOVAL 8069u2 7.37 FRESCO, -. ---MAINTNANCE iATEPIALS 6.9i;,3• 467.39 FRONTIER LUMBER MAINTENANCE `SATERIALS ' CITY OF CHANHASSEN A C C 0 U N 7 .S P A Y A S L E DATE 11-20-78 PAGE 14 0_S._ AND-S UPPLIES,'._QUIPTMENT ANQ_ UNIFORMS _ 'AND -SMALL TOOLS + EQUID. AND -MOTOR FUELS + LUBRICANTS AND -SUPPLIES, OFFIC- i AND -OFFICE EDUIPTMENT I t i 369t35 21.6� -GL'ENW00D-INGLEWOOD SUPPLIES, OFFICE AND -UTILITIES 006906 i,300 0 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO LAND -PURCHASE + imp 406907 100.60 HAYDEN MURPHY SUPPLIES, EQUIPTMENT 110 H 0 38S_ W AL T E:R T- _,,....._ _... --- _._ -,_.. _ SALARIES _+ WAGES_, REG. 006909 2,123.40 INDEP SCHOOL DIST 112 FEES, SERVICE C�6910 21.20 KINGS SERVICE FE=S, SERVICE u06911 293.46 ROBERT MARK KOEGLER TRAVEL + TRAINING 006912 342.69 KR'�GER JACK TRAdEL +'TRAINING Expenses for State F - October 26 - 29, 197 006913 11,400i12� LAMETTI PETER CONST OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES See attached copy. i _ 0.0._6.91.4.r _ 2,p.�0.23,:.1-5- LARSON + MERTZ - ....___._..__ ...._ _._._..-_ . FEES, SERVICE 006915 3,156.30' LARSON + MERTZ FEES, SERVICE AND -LEGAL + FISCAL 006916 19562.50 -LASALLE RUPPERT +.ASSOC LEGAL + FISCAL See attached copy. 0.._U._11-_ ------------ C__.L__A__I___-M__A_-._.N......... 00_Fi.919_._..:: -- __6.5.01G __ ..w_.V_.LU.KEN_I.S.__P_ROE_.PO.OLS,:... _._....: _u..F_�.ES .__S RVICE ...__� :v See attached copy. 006920 456.50 LUTZ"TREE SERVICE GRANTS + SUBSIDIES Tree dumping 006921 3 3 M A .P S 'I f S SERVICE DICE " See attached copy 8:0O K S .._ +_ , R_ R T O,J !.,A 906923 61329.7u METRO WASTE CONTROL GOMM -, REMITT TO OTHER AGENCIES Sewer service chatges fox 006924 13.80 M-EUWISSEN MARY JEAN TRAVEL + TRAINING ....,,..,+�s.,. Q MIN.i.VESa_T_AT.RAP_SIT.�_LIN.E,S _... __.._.__. .__._.FEE S��SERVICE G06926 62,0.35 MINN VICTORIA OIL CO MOTOR FUELS + LUBRICANTS 006927 55931,78 MINNETONKA COMMUNITY SLR, SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP► Life guards and other ser ,.-AND _.F,E.E.Ss�'S�=_RVICE City share of 1977-f8 MCf 006928 84.00 MOBILE RA0I0 REP. + MAINT., EQUIPT. AND -RADIOS 306929 884.215, MUELLER WM +'SONS MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00693E 95.G0 NATL REC AND PARK ASSN SALARIE'S + WAGES, REG. Tshiis a Voided check:" 006931 .__:_78.42 NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS INC SUPP! IES• OFFICE 006932 1031117.95 NOOLAND + ASSN OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES See .attached copy. 006933 61882.819 NORTHERN CONTRACTING CO AWA DED CONST CONTRAC7S See attached copy. r_..._959. ..._PEARSON,..RW._ .._,. _. SALARIES + WAGES, REG. 006935 35.25 PITNEY BOWES'INC RENTALs EQUIPTMENT 006936 144.99 R113AS- PRINTING = PR INTiNG AND PUt3LISHING Ballots, pad, ,dater pens ANO-OFFICE EQUIPTMENT stackables, On. 6937 163.6 RIVER WAaRRr_ AGGREGATES MAINTENANCE i�iA7ERIAi S 006938 22.62 ROAD MACHINERY SUPPLIES, E-QUIPTMENT 4 E CITY OF CHANHASSEN A C C 0 U N T 5; P A Y A 8 .L t DATE 11-i p0-18 PAUE 16 _-P _U�?_ P _a. S� f S T _L Tc I DU RIES `INC R��L E MUTPTENT ___ ._ 006940 218.87 SCHLENK GERALD TRAVEL + TRAINING 0�6941 28,119.87 SCHOELL + MAOSON FEES,5ERVICL See attached copic AND -OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 006942 2.39 7-HI COAST TO COAST SUPPLI.S, OFFICE KOPc_E_..F4_.P_L'.. r__,_....._....... ._.__..._.., ... .. SUPPLIES, EQU_Z_PT_MP_N _ 006944 1,267.00, SHOREWOOD TREE CLEANING + WASTE REMOVAL AND GRANTS + SUBSIDIES- 006945 11906.88 SOLIDIFICATION ING OTHER CONST COSTS See attached copy. 00 6946 22� .w�;. SOUTHWEST PLIIMBI�VG See attached copy. REP. MAINT.4 UTILITY. 6 7 55.90 SPRUCE COMPANY SUPPLIES, OFFICE _006948 4.95 STATE REGISTER SUPPLIES, OFFICE 3u 6949 90.100 SULLIVAN SEPTIC - REP* -+ MAINT#j EQUIPT,. - 0�6°50 7.10 THURK BODY + IMPLEMENT SUPPLIES, EQUIPTMtNT 006951 63i.5� TONKA TREE. SERVICE CLEANING + WASTE REMOVAL AND -GRANTS + SUBSIDIES 006952 4.00 VICTORIA REPAIR SUPPLIES, EQUIPTMENT j06953 -'39.19 WACONIA FARM SUPPLY SUPPLIES, EQUIPTMENT ..` 5.0 0 _ W A R I T ZNICK SALARIES + WAGES, R EG 006955 12; .60 WATER PRODUCTS CO MAINTENANCE MATER. ALS 006950 .._._- _ --.__ _. . __.. __ .__W... ___ 124,425,97 ____--:. w w_.__. _.____ _:_ .. _— WEST SUBURBAN UTILITY .-- AWARDED CONST CONTRACTS See attached copy. AND -OUTSIDE EENGINEERINS FEES 006957 44C.15 WHITE 6Em:AR LAKE CITY OF FEES, SERVICE' R.C.C.M. billing f 00._69.5� 2..110..._ BIRDSALL CONSTRUCTION REFJND_S... +.__R.E..._IMBURSE..t Overcharge of buil REFUNDS + E4IMBU 5; . Refund ,s.ew�rs,erv�_ce char e,, customE Shorewood. 006960 .50 RUTH HALL REFUNDS + RE-IMBURSE. Refund overcharge of sur tax on Bldc J0696i 4.50 ....., _ , .. ELIZABETH LUCAS ,. _ . _ _. _... _. _ _ _._._ __ REFUNDS + _ __.... _ ... - - --__ _ _ . ____ RE-IMBURSE. _- -----. -.._.. ____ _ _ ._ Refund overcharge of sur ta>..'on Bldc 2.5G DAVIa MORi�OW -FUNDS r _ _.. r2 IDupSE� _ _. _ __. _ ._._of_surtaxo<n Refundovercharge _ Bldc Oi�6963 4.50 NORSE EXTERIORS REFUNDS + RE-IMBURSE, Refund overcharge.of sur tax on Bld< 0Cl6964 150.110 RICHARD PERKINS REFUNDS + R--IMBUJRSE, - - 6 .50 M,RS flt-AN WALLENTINE R E FUN9S + tRE IMBURSP. Refund ov_erchar e of sur tax on Bldc 006966 2.CO WALT WHITEHILL REFUNDS + RE-IMBURSE, Refund overcharge of sur tax on Bldc 06967 40.50 _-_.-___.. BASTIAN HELEN< SALARIES WAGES, TEMP. November 7, 1978-ELECTION JUDGE 000968 40 050 BLEED LOUISr SALARI S + WAGES, 006969 42.75 BOYLE PAT SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, OC 6970 21.00 SANDY.BRUESEHOFF SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP,' - 6971 42.75 BUSCHKOWSKY VIOLA SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, 006972 84.N01' MARY LOU CHMIEL SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, 006973 4G.50 COMER DOROTHY FEES, SERVICE 006974 45.L'Q COULTER SANDY SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP.' GG 6975 30.75 PAT DONNAY SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, +�6976 35.25 JOANN HALLGREN SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, Cis 6977 20,25 ALAN FOX SALARI S WAGES, TEMP. 06978 30,75 KATHY F-RYKMAN SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. ,56979 20.25 iAYE HEOTKE SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, ' ^698t 24.75 HEINLEIN MAR SALARIES + WAGES, TEMPS N.. _ n_0 _ S =_._ r M-E—. . N OV EMB E R 7, 1978 ELECTION J _r _ 0n 6984 27.00 MONA -KER3-R SALARIES WAGES, TE,";P. 0 698" 46.50 PAT KERBER SALARIES + WAGES, TTEMP. G<6-9.86.... __:.. ,...:.. 26..2 _._._....-KLI-NG=L_H.U.TZ AL_....::.:.-.., ...:. ...... _._.....' SALAD -DES._+_ A_ _E.S.,'.-_�T 006987 20.25 SHIRLEY KREGER SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 006988 26.25 DORIS LARSON:. SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. J2_69.89_- ..:__ ._ w._. -Z4._77 _._._ f L 0_Y CHL�R_:S_Fi;�R..I':.._ ._. SALAJRI 06993 4�.50 METCALF MAE SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, 006991 49.50 MEUWISSEN JOANNE SALARIES + WAGES, ;TEMP, .26.2.5.._.. _..BEV MORROW._._.._... _ _...._ ...... .....SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP._. � 169S- 4L .50 KATHY OESTREICH SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, 0069914 46.50 PETERSON <KAREN SALARIES + WAGES s ;TEMP. �.•25._.__ PHYLLIS POPE ...__.:. . .::_ .......__....:.._. SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, 006996 40.50 BASER FLORENCE SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 1306997 42.00 R I C K L E F S E L A I N E SALARIES + WAGES-, TEMP. ._.:.0_069.9.8....__'....-.......__..0o5,0- --SFi'YROBINSON ...: ._..___......___._.. SALARIES _ ._.... _ . .. _ _ .._ ,.., .. + WAGES,_ ._ . _. _...__._ TEMP. 006999 30.75 KAY ROTHE SALARIES +.WAGES, TEMP. 07�t�r 21.CU FCOUFS MAtRLENE SALARIES + WAGES, TEMPO 0_m.50_ v.._..__BETT,Y ROY ___.... __.. w..._SALARIES:+ WAGES,_JEMP, 007002 49.50 SCHROEDEZ MARIE SALARIES + WAGES: TEMP. 0J7003 21.0 ;OAN SCHUIT7 SAt A;RiLS WAGES, TEMP* 40.50 SINNEN .J AN .. S A L A R I E 5 + WAGES, T-MP. _ ' 7 i n C r. •� C'l U A D Y i V 11 V J A L; A Q A i I .J 7_ C L Lt A C C o ^ u h i i 007009.70 LEONA WENNING SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP., 0. .1.�t.:`_._ ..._. 35.25. IN 'IEIME 5ALA,�.IES._ (_WAGES f 1 0107011 21.00 WARNEKE OELIA SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 007012 41Pm50 MAZY WIECMAN SALARIES + WNGiS, TEMP. tJ +0,05:;,.___.. .W.oiTAt.La_ ,3ULIt+CrLL,E, __...SALA.I_Ls_____.Au�S__'...T._.Mp.Q_._..___:___.___:_ 150 336,920.37 CHECKS WRITTEN TOTAL OF 230 CHECKS TOTAL N=XkXX,2Xf 910,459.63 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE IN HOUSE CHECKS FOR NOVEMBER 20th COUNCIL MEETING 10220 500.00 Postmaster Postage 10221 5.77 - United Parcel Service -UPS Charge to return step ladder 10242- 163.08 -Carver County Herald Publications 10243 65.00 Eden Prairie Sanitation Garbage pick up Sep and Oct 10244 84.00 Ess Bros & Sons Casing and Cover for Man Hole 10245 7 19 Garwood Twin Cities Supplies__._ - 10246 9.58 Kenny's Market Supplies ` 1024 9, 98 .- Minnesota -Geological Survey_ , ....`...._ _....At1 as for 10248 161.28 M-V Gas Company Propane Gas 10249 1,040.52 Minnesota Electric Co-op - Electrical connection for 2 lift stations 10250 248.00 Skyline Fence Repair retaining wall 10251 120.25 Water Products 1-l";grater meter and parts 10252 161.00 Wilcox Paper Co 10 cases Xerox paper 10253 _....___. ..__..,__. 455.29 Xerox Corporation .__. _. ____ ___ _....__ .. Copier rent for October P. 10254 30.00 Laurence Thaemert __. __... __..__.._._.._.._ Pump septic tank at Maint Bldg/ 10255 22.50 Internatl City Mgmt Assn. Book ._ 0256 -�__ ._.._ ._ __.... _ ---95.00 _.-...___.-Johh" Neveaux-...w TOTAL HOUSE CHECKS 3,178.44 CITY O F \\, k ' 7610 LAREDO DRIVEeP.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth DATE: November 20, 1978 SUBJ: Industrial Revenue Bond Request, Roman Roos, West 78th Street, Proposed Professional Office Building Enclosed in "council member only" packets are reports received by this office from the city attorney' s office and M. J. Long regarding the proposed industrial revenue bond request submitted by Roman Roos. These two reports deal strictly with the financial assets and liabilities of the proposal. The summarized recommendation of these two consultants are included in the following comments: 1) . Advisory Role - Juran and Moody: Enclosed in this packet please find a letter forwarded to Juran and Moody on October 16th stating that, as Juran and Moody would act as the underwriter, they could not be considered as fiscal advisor to the City on this sale. I do not believe that Bob Sander anticipated Juran and Moody's involvement in potential sales in Chanhassen when original criteria were established; however, as they are proposing both this sale as well as the Gedney Plant Expansion, this office was forced to make temporary arrangements with M. J. Long and Company to act as the fiscal advisor for these two projects. Joe Froehling is anticipated to be present to answer council questions regarding the work completed by his office . Continuation of M. J. Long' s advisory capacity will be placed on a future council agenda. 2) . Disclosure - City Attorney: Included in the packet is a disclosure of the attorney' s office stating that they have acted as legal advisor to Roman Roos. This office sees no conflict with the firm of Larson and Mertz acting as legal advisor on the proposed sale given the comments in their October llth letter. 3) . Summarization of Fiscal and Attorney' s Recommendations : Both the attorney's office and fiscal advisor had significant difficulty in applying the existing fiscal criteria to the proposed sale documents. Specifically, the existing criteria were generated considering redevelopment or new construction by an existing business . Mayor and Council -2- November 20, 1978 Giventrelatively new business status of this proposal, the tests as previously established have little or no meaning . It is the belief of this office that the city council must make a determination as to whether new businesses will be considered for industrial revenue bond financing and under what conditions . "Possible Changes to Existing Criteria" have been included for council consideration. Of primary concern to this office would be that any new businesses be treated in a similar fashion to existing businesses, i.e. that the new business be required to have equity in the proposal similar to the assets which would be pledged through expansion of an existing business. The percent of equity could vary depending upon the type of application. Additionally, it is the belief of this office that new business ventures should only be considered for industrial revenue bond financing if - a) the city council finds that the "positive nature" criteria have been met and, b) that the proposed sale would be as a private placement wherein the city would explicitly state their inability to review fiscal criteria of the proposed sale and, as such, we would place the entire responsibility for reviewing such with the firm proposing to purchase the bonds. The above potential changes in criteria were not originally considered at the time that Roman Roos filed for industrial revenue bond financing. This office leaves the determination as to whether the Roos propsal would be considered under "potential future criteria" , or under criteria as presently exists to city council discretion. This office has been informed that, if the Roos Professional Building is to be a reality, a decision is required on this request this evening. • �,Y1` 22 LARSON & MERTZ `' ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RUSSELL H. LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE CRAIG M. MERTZ (612) 335-9565 — October 11, 1978 OF COUNSEL HARVEY E.SKAAR MARK C.MCCULLOUGH Donald W. Ashworth Chanhassen City Manager Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Roos Office Building Proposal. Dear Don: We wish to state for the record that prior to initiation of the Roman Roos industrial revenue bond proposal, this office performed certain legal work for the Roos family, including two real estate matters outside of Chanhassen, the preparation of wills, and the preparation of a rough draft of a real estate partnership agreement. The foregoing matters have been concluded, with the exception of the partnership matter, which Mr . Roos has referred to other counsel at our request. We have only one open Roos file at this time . That file concerns a corporate accounts receivable suit pending in Scott County. That suit will be tried this fall . Mr. Roos has retained other counsel to represent him in his dealings with the City, specifically the office building proposal and industrial revenue bond proposal. It is our intention to handle the above described collection matter to its conclusion. If you find our continued handling of this collection matter objectionable, please so advise and we will make arrangements with Mr. Roos to obtain substitute counsel. urs very truly, ---,„7„,7-- . CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen City Attorney CMM:mep h OCr 1978 RAC co CliiiNVAtiatx ti K ct‘;:741e00 � 9Z5z'°�� o Lc INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDING e' �� REVISION TO CRITERIA �r 1. Preamble a. Purpose of I.R.B. ' s b. City Intent c. Method of Review 1. Positive Nature of Proposal 2. Fiscal Criteria 2. Fiscal Criteria Amended to Include: a. Existing Businesses - with 5 years of history and proposal being an expansion of such business or pledging assets of such business shall be considered as follows : 1) . All tests previously applied shall remain valid, 2) . 100% financing may be considered for private placements, 3) . For public offerings City staff may recommend a 10% to 20% equity requirement should the proposed sale be for: a) . A single purpose facility b). Include more than % of equipment or other furnishings of the business c) . Housing proposals, not initiated by the HRA, or a business or firm directly competing with an existing business or firm. b. New Business - Any firm or business eligible for I. R.B. financing under state law, but not meeting the requirements of section a) . , above; shall be considered in light of the following: 1) . City staff may recommend a 10% to 20% equity requirement 1 for proposals which are private placements and if the proposal is a general purpose facility with less than % of the financing being used for equipment or other furnishings. 2) . Proposals not meeting a) . , above, or b. 1) . , above, shall not be considered without a variance by the city council. LARSON Sc MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RUSSELL H.LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE CRAIG M. MERTZ (612) 335-9565 OF COUNSEL November 13, 1978 HARVEY E.SKAAR MARK C.Mc CULLOUGH Donald W. Ashworth Chanhassen City Manager Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Roos IDR Preliminary Resolution Dear Don: Attached is our redraft of the proposed resolution giving preliminary approval to the Roos IDR proposal. The most significant revision of the Dorsey draft is that in our draft, the City requires placement of the revenue note ("bond") with an institutional . -star. '`' l my urs, RUSSELL H. LARSON Chanhassen City Attorney RHL:mep Encl. 02.1314, , c 3 �> ccq jai oi3 'L c MayiNC4 �c, le/in SZ `tic t, • CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION Date: Resolution No. Motion by Councilman Seconded by Councilman RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUB- MISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SAID PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT. WHEREAS, (a) The purpose of Chapter 474 , Minnesota Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, as found and determined by the legislature, is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment, and for this purpose the state has encouraged action by local governmental units; (b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in urban and metropolitan areas, and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of governmental services required to meet the needs of the increased population, and the need for development and use of land which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs; (c) The City desires to expand its business and employment opportunities, and the available tax base of the City; (d) The City Council has received from Rome Properties (the "Company") a proposal that the City finance a project for purposes consistent with the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, said project to consist of the acquisition of land and construction of two professional office buildings aggregating approximately 22, 000 square feet (the "Project" ) , all at a cost presently estimated at $700, 000; (d) The Project would aid and assist the City, the school district and the county, and the full faith and credit of the City would not be pledged or be responsible in connection with such Project. -1- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, as follows : (1) The proposal of the Company that the City undertake to provide financing for the Project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes) by acquisition of the Project to be leased or sold by the City to the Company, or by direct loans of the revenue bond proceeds to the Company, all upon such terms and conditions, with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on bonds of the City to be issued pursuant to the aforesaid Chapter 474 to finance said Project, is hereby given preliminary approval by the City. (2) On the basis of information provided to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the development of economically sound commerce in the City, to increase the assessed value of property within the City and to increase current employ- ment opportunities for residents of the City and surrounding areas, all to the benefit of the residents and taxpayers of the City, the school district, the county and the State of Minnesota . (3) The Project above referred to and the issuance of revenue bonds in the amount necessary to pay the costs of the Project, presently estimated to be $700, 000 , are hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to approval of the Project by the Commissioner of Securities and to the mutual agreement of the City, the Company, and the initial purchaser of the bonds as to the details of the bond issue and provisions for their payment, and subject, further, to the reservation of the right by the City to deny the application of the Company at any stage of the proceedings prior to the adoption of the final resolution authorizing issuance of the bonds . (4) In all events, it is understood, however, that the bonds, when, as and if issued, shall be sold only to institutionalinvestors, that the bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except the project, and each bond shall recite in substance that the bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues received from the Project and property pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City. (5) In accordance with the Minnesota Statutes, §474 .01, Subd. 7, the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner of Securities for his approval of the Project. The Mayor, City Manager, City Attorney and other officers, -2- �.. employees and agents of the City are authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project, if it is approved by the Commissioner . Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Chanhassen this day of , 1978 . Mayor ATTEST: City Manager YES NO " 1 • -3- CITE OF \LIete' /1(, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 October 10, 1978 Juran & Moody, Inc. Attention: Russell L. Prince 114 East Seventh Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Dear Mr. Prince: Iam in receipt of your letter of October 3rd requesting City Council consideration of industrial revenue bond financing for Mr. Roman Roos. This office was unable to place this request on the October 16th agenda as requested. Factors delaying consideration are: 1) . I am sure that Bob Sanders did not anticipate your firms involvement in an industrial revenue bond financing issue with the City during initial dis- cussions of IRB criteria discussions with the City Council. Given the fact that your film is presenting this application, the City has been forced to make other arrangements for review of the fiscal aspects of IRB financing requests. Using Bob' s experience in developing criteria for IRB is quite beneficial; however, I hope you realize that determining who would carry out the fiscal review for this issue and future IRB issues has created a minor time delay. For this specific issue, I have made arrangements with the CPA firm of M. J. Long to carry out the fiscal review for the City. After completion of this project, determination will be made by both M. J. Long and the City as to whether there involvement should continue on future issues. 2) . The City Council agenda of October 16th is filled and it is questionable whether all items shown on that agenda can be completed on October 16th - without consideration of your request. Juran & Moody -2- ( Jctober 10, 1978 3) . Per the adopted Council criteria, a deposit is ti.. to be made by the applicant to defray all costs of the fiscal advisor as well as attorney ' s office. The Roman Roos request presents a new factor not considered in the fiscal criteria, i.e. should the City consider requests for IRB' s for new firms, and, if so, under what conditions. To insure this appli- cation is expedited, I would request that a deposit of $500. 00 be placed by the applicant prior to any work being completed by the City Attorney' s office or fiscal agent. Assuming that such monies can be received within the next week, review by these two agencies should be completed for Council review on November 6 , 1978. You should also be aware that, as development criteria has not been established for new firms, that additional information or reports may be required by the City Council on November 6th which could further delay action on this item and which could cause an additional increase in the amount of escrow from the applicant. One critical question will be whether this issue is to be considered as a private placement. Should you have any questions in regards to this letter, please feel free to contact me. Sincere •yy )s() ) , • r i.— Don Ashworth City Manager DA:njo cc: Joe Froehling, M. J. Long Co. City Attorney, Russell Larson t JURAN & MOODY , INC . MUNICIPAL BONDS EXCLUSIVELY 114 EAST SEVENTH STREET - SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE 612/298-1500 _ October 11, 1978 /c / 7 Mr. Don Ashworth City Manager City of Chanhassen 7610 T aredo Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 RE: CHANHASSEN OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAL Dear Mr. Ashworth: Thank you for your letter of October 10, 1978. We are disappointed that we could not be placed on your October 16 agenda, but will look forward to a spot on the November 6 schedule. I will contact Mr. Roos today concerning your request for a $500.00 deposit. Mr. Boos lives in Chanhassen and likely will want to deliver the check himself. On the subject of the sale of the bond, please be advised that we are contemplating this issue to be a private placement with an institutional lender. No public sale is foreseen for this project. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Very truly yours, JURAN & MJODY, INC. CLLRussell L. Prince RLP/tld •\ 1!/J4 N R OCT r197� V 4 STY O F '° ' A - ;-- - Y ,. 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 147°CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 �' - (612) 474-8885 October 16, 1978 Juran and Moody Attn: Russell Prince 114 East 7th Street St . Paul, MN 55101 Dear Mr. Prince: This office has been notified by our City Attorney, Russell Larson, and Fiscal Advisor, M. J. Long and Company of the necessity of the following information regarding the two industrial revenue bond issues being presented by your firm: 1) . Roman Roos Professional Building - West 78th Street: Please forward a copy of the following documents to both M. J. Long and Company and Russell Larson. This information must be received by each of the respective offices by October 25th to insure their reports can be completed and submitted to the City Council for their November 6, 1978, council meeting. a) . Mr. Roos' projection on rental values and how such was calculated. b) . Proposed use of proceeds as distributed between purchase of land, construction costs, and equipment. c) . The proposed term of indebtedness including principal and interest payments. d) . Total projected indebtedness. e) . A copy of the past three year audit returns of Mr. Roos. f) . Disclosure of involvement of Mr. Eastburn.. If he is to be involved in the project, a copy his financial statement including the past three years tax returns would additionally be required. Mr. Russell Prince -2- October 16, 1978 2) . Gedney Tuttle Plant Expansion Proposal: The following information regarding the Gedney proposal must be forwarded to each of the respective offices prior to November 1, 1978, to insure incorporation of this item on the November 20th council agenda. Prior to each of the respective offices beginning any work on this proposal, an escrow deposit of $3, 000 must be submitted to this office. The same conditions are established for the Gedney proposal in regards to the escrow deposit as were established for the Roos proposal, i.e. monies so deposited will only be used to reimburse actual payments made to the City Attorney ' s office and Fiscal Agent and any monies remaining in this escrow account will be returned to Mr. Gedney after final consideration. a) . Site plan and proposed building plans (showing type of construction) . b) . Full audit report. c) . Disclosure of the use of proceeds listing the type of equipment proposed to be purchased (value of such and useful life) and the value of buildings or land proposed to be purchased through proceeds. d) . Disclosure of the terms of indebtedness including interest rate, principal and interest payments per year, and term of indebtedness. e) . Total projected indebtedness. As the above documents or information was requested by both M. J. Long and the City Attorney's office, I would suggest that any questions regarding clarification of any item be submitted to either office . Should you have any questions of a general nature or regarding timings shown, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Don Ashworth City Manager DA:k • CITY OF 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 i PLANNING REPORT DATE: November 16, 1978 TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel SUBJ: Conditional Use Permit, 6901 Shawnee Lane APPLICANT: Roy Barke PLANNING CASE: P-590 Petition Mr. Barke is requesting a conditional use permit to construct an amateur radio tower upon the subject property. Zoning ordinance 47 requires that a conditional use permit be obtained for any amateur radio transmission antennas in a residential district. Background Community Location: As shown in enclosure 1, the subject property is located approximately 400 feet west of the intersection of Shawnee Lane and County Road 17 (Powers Blvd) . Existing Zoning: The subject property and its environs are presently zoned R-1, single family residential district. Planner's Comments As shown in the attached application for consideration of planning request, Mr . Barke is proposing to construct a 60 foot radio antenna 12 feet from the southeast corner of the dwelling situated on the property. Additionally, indicated on the attached planning commission minutes of October 25, 1978, Mr. Barke has indicated that the tower is 80 feet from the front of the lot, and approximately the same distance from the rear and side lot line. The antenna varies in width from 10 to 20 feet and is self supporting with no guy wires. The Planning Commission has reviewed and entered into the record the attached correspondence received from surrounding residents, Richard C. Potts , and Arlys Gribovsky. Both of these correspondences object to the antenna on the grounds of visual appearance, and in addition Mr. Potts speaks of the possibility of over modulation onto • Mr. Don Ashworth -2- November 16, 1978 neighboring radio 'and television receivers . Also attached is the petition of no objection that was presented by Mr. Barke at the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Throughout the discussion and staff review of this request, the subject of signal spill over was found to be of major importance. Mr. Barke has indicated that he has a considerably efficient antenna which is adaptable to traps and filtering devices, and that to date he has received no complaints to signal spill over from this particular antenna. Upon discussion with the Federal Communications Commission, I have found that it is their policy that in cases of signal spill over it is due to the inadequacy of the surrounding t.v. or radio sets, however the FCC does have toll free numbers where at complaints can be registered and the broadcaster is alerted to the problem. In my recommendation to the planning commission on October 24, 1978, was included several items from the ordinances of the City of Bloomington in reference to radio ;transmission antennas, and are as follows : a. Antennas shall be setback from property lines and structures a distance of 5 feet greater than the height of the antenna. b. That the antenna have proper corrosive treatment. c. That the antenna meet uniform wind loading requirments . d. That the power be subject to annual inspection. The planning commission duly held a public hearing for the subject request and subsequently recommended to grant a conditional use permit for the construction of anamateur radio transmission antenna at 6901 Shawnee Lane with the condition that the setback will be such as the height of the tower antenna will not fall outside the lot line, and that the permit will be subject to review upon complaints from neighbors. Planner' s Recommendation In concurrence with the recommendation of the planning commission, I would recommend that the city council approve a conditional use permit for Mr. Barke with the following additions to the planning commission recommendation: a. That the antenna meet the standards set forth by the Uniform Building Code. b. That the antenna be dismantled after 6 months of termination of use. c. That the antenna be subject to annual inspection. • Mayor and Council -3- November 16, 1978 Manager's Comments �... The tower and antennae have been installed and, as such, there may be support to allow it to stay. Unfortunately, there are few guidelines this office can advise the council of in considering this issue over and above those discussed by the Planning Commission. However, I believe there are three important points which were not emphasized in planning commission consideration: 1) . Neighborhood petitions often become emotional issues dealing more with ability of neighbors to live together rather than the merits of the issue or long range effects. 2) . There may be a misconception as to the effects of conditional use permits. Although the permit process does provide the council with certain discretion in reviewing applications on an individual basis, such process does not allow for differential treatment of owners if they are generally similar requests. Stated another way, if approved, the council would find difficulty in denying another similar application in this neighborhood or general area. As no other similar application has been approved in this area, the council' s action can be precedent setting - a factor which may not have been understood by owners signing the petition. 3) . The courts have generally expanded traditional zoning powers of cities recognizing the importance of aesthetic considerations as well as visual considerations . (ll (19-". J 2.1, • : / _- . Christmas ! _„ __— -1`�` _ ' "-,••.• •• •r .'J • Vijoi,- d (�Lake /�• •` i) ;° III arr.-4-41••C-4 • ilr . • . :-11:1i!:41.-+.,• • • -Cq---- . ... Alf& *la I 1 • r iii ildi r.LI • IV TO 4: :N 1 '" '.-.1 A ,. -,,,. . . •,.., , og ,.• i . -,...„, _ __ , , . _.„,.„.._.: „=,,,„,,,,...rg •• �' I* % . ;-: ... :. . ... .. (.7 \eve I UL: ,f .. \-,-0. -4')( . •� ® qs '... ' r"4Att , ± rii.....- ,.., -- ,) ,00ne ;eslaw,-1 -__-_„-% - ..,si • •• R r-- take Lucy ‘4r--) a •, - 1\ �� 1I�rGila _ f' �� a• •• •: SUr3J ® -A, (iirtD,,C . \ I 4 l\ y •� • • .F Lake ��/ 1; •F • • y Lake Ann I • :a• ` • • e ' ,• •f :Mil • • 17 0 its a.• 4 U Ea ([Q��[CpJ]Qn a° ►F POI '!5 as +►[ �aa4l' 1•11�% A77,FTBZ rum r YARD ��///�/ au • x.- I �`/ • ry� • r;767-6'Hi.: , 0 -' -ogiiiiiiiimmil---.. ..---'.-........----.4W CC I 45 excIFIC........ ---". --.."'-:::: ..........,„„../111111 1:73;172111.°":11s91- . Q °'r• .,.. . ._ .,..,, ,,, ,.,0,,..„ • _ i L.,..,4:777 •F :/ ' -..,..." '"'r- �� • PX Lake Susan �'` • 'k '474 f Rice ,`t 15 ' G Lakeh @ s• . . -..,..__-,___,,, .., V __— r _____.,, ... . r I*" 4- 1. ----,) .s cil • 1 x 1 St0 1 { Q 5a0a N ' / Y -24 . •...- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. • CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HIENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST • Date of Application 67 -76 7 - Fee Paid 35.cO . Date Received by at-e-A_-c,{-- U Daytime Phone # et Z 7` 3G"? L�. • Applicant: ��rr � Name: spc j`ice Kam? Initial Last First Address:____OM 51-ALc)t.?E�= ,L.. 1JE d5I IL r � ` . 3 1 Number and Street . City State Zip Code Owner Name: : Stst in •-t ..e 5 ail n v -•e- Number and Street • City State Zip Code �` Address of Property in Question : C,f2I 514 n -e- )r) . Legal description of properly in question: •-f- 2 ,�. c k - " '`e€n IL"c`'4 51,, ma's ` • . : • Reason for Request: -err,--e-�t /� �'-/1- . t .fir J/J/1 h , 4 t. __,,,47/ ._. --)--- lie;.. 1"1 % - 0-Z 0 ., , ./'nG, O� �� G j/7-C'J1 /"?1 Present zo n ii ing of proper tY: l �-1�. �� =-� r Present use of property : C-----dt-4,ck.a.c.3 ' , ' C L'C; CITY OF CHANHASSEN Cj CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA \a...A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ROY BARKS, CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Chanhassen will meet on Wednesday, October 25th, 1978 at 7 : 45 p.m. at the City Hall, 7610 Laredo Drive, Chanhassen, Minnesota for the purpose of holding a public hearing to consider the conditional use to instruct an amateur radio transmission antennae on the following described tract of land: "Lot 2 , Block 4 Greenwood Shores (6901 Shawnee Drive) . " All persons interested may appear and be heard at said time and place. BY ORDER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Bob ' Taibel , Ass ' t. City Planner (Publish in the Carver County Herald on October 11, 1978. ) Zad‘i -/1/?6g'nileae)f-/I ItrG( %.11,r(f01 e,.,4; /7,4zex, v *Z/ id/f4 t&i/H‘eJ 1-‘7'.elaki41-4i--7 11<i)14711 Z/>, 4/41Z9fiard de/. .1/11 .04e--J • J ci.vIA-4-7/' v .4 0/ nv° 41► �:CF 1978 7.1 SEC '- 49.i' M!lvN v,�`17 October 23, 1978 Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 7610 Loredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ROY BARKE HEARING WEDNESDAY, 10-25-78, 7:45 P.M. Gentlemen: I am concerned about the installation of the amateur (ham) radio station and antenna at 6901 Shawnee Drive. On somewhat of a personal viewpoint, I don't think the 60 foot steel tower does much for the aesthetic value of the neighborhood. T1ore importantly, and as you probably know, Roy Barke is a ham radio operator licensed to broadcast up to 1,000 watts of power. Therefore my primary concern is the television reception that I am going to experience in the future. I have had the experience of living in another community in years past near a ham radio operator and have listened to him broadcast over the television set. Some ham radio operators take the position that they are operating legally and the responsibility of the television interference is with the TV manufacturers that have not provided the necessary filtering equipment. Roy Barke's radio station up to this point has not interfered with my television reception but that does not necessarily mean it will not in the future. I would hope that the Planning Commission, when recommending the conditional use permit, can stipulate that Roy Barke be required to provide the necessary filter equipment to his neighbors if his radio station starts interfering with television reception. Ver;X truly yours, Richard C. Potz 6881 Tecumseh Lane Chanhassen, MN s , • . . r TO: Chanhassen Planning Committee - SUbJECT: Amatuer radio antenna tower located on Lot 2 Block 4 of Greenwood Shores `..' (6901 Shawnee Lane), home of Roy 8 Barke. Li I am signing this letter to inform the planning committee of my position on the previously described amatuer radio tower. The amatuer radio tower does not constitute an. objectionable sight to the neighborhood and interference fk to other forms of broadcast media have not occured. It ii my desire to approve the request for a variance. 1 in case, I will not be able to attend the planning committee meeting, my signature will confirm my approval of the amatuer radio tower. . NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE tt0,t J (' L L-Li'�, , 6`; o__r -..1��L ; c, 4/ ) C7 —S'j" ! K ! i j,-/ -1. / '. 'om L - �.7 -)`_ � � j4 iv: f i g3D s��'��Z� . c -.; z L ii//�,,_ �., G y y—38s/ r ,,'c v ti•;i.„.t,T c% ¢' 1 l_ . _:L4../L i ,{ e 1 A-- fps-^•c�i �7--'— S'/G)�j/ 71- i.,, / 67-rt. /V— fit/ 0 � / '(r � l �'�� , � � J rk, b Cr 1/-a 4 j X� Y7 ( � C •S' i `� (o 9 27 ' 5�--)\ .A_R '7 J -� 0 f _ 2:I , ,kc.., M / � - a7 ? , ,, u. e / r// �,��'�'/LI CU 6 p�/ � 2�{ — l/�/C� ., f V _,, _20 1 Li_d_ 6 73-0 744,144.,„,46.0R___ y) Y - P ? , /cui !? E 5 �, `u / „T. ‘,-, . 4 (..,,,--.......,gib,. r 1 i .._, , ,_ ,),f5Z, 474 —4 44 i, . ,.... ,,, :�;.545 5 ,lii, O A,,,,,,,,,,,,,,A.,_,,,/ ', y—6cj/ t 1 .,(7(- ) i 62 4 I --77-7c-m56--7-1 Z Ark-i C 4 7 f - ?.3o6 1 _.?4 ,'�r a-ez-e__/z ,L4 A =V-Pit- 9 fi g, 4_,., ,, 60,0 ie.,..,,,,iy , ' i„, ,,./ y ,--4a/il p,,,,p/ C,k/6) 7--1-6(42.,>---id--- 477 V- (57-(7.P a. Eu,6 ogoo qz:tman 46ye qw1- 01-57 19, ,1,1,,,, „. 6 q !1 4- -v -'t--_- 41 7a ? 0 ? 3 (:(k/--/�� 13 6o runt bVic( 1 `f 7 y y23 V (e /e' ('r eg."& ----- te.p.,:,,,,t,F4,1,,,,„),1 / / .;--/ )12,,L,„,,-(--.L. iv, y?5z __ ,6 ,3--, _,..c 96,v7tialay /31/ /A/ d_7 y- i o � e� \ �, W-1Db �u I Q. msen 14 -1 LI - .�- .7 8` r v S42 d O CSC LLPv +0 /77 / ( - 2 /S---- r AT) 11 �c �J� A tL :fit tP REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1978 Roman Roos called the meeting to order at 7 :30 p.m. with the following members present : Tim Stone, Dick Matthews , Jerry Neher, and Walter Thompson. Mal MacAlpine was absent . NEW MFMBER: The Assistant VCit Attorney administered the Oath of Office to Pat Swenson as a new member of the Planning Col?suission. . MINUTES : Amend •the motion under HAPPY CHEF AND ERICKSON PETROLEUM CORPORATION in the October 11, 1978 , Planning Couuuission minutes to read: Mal MacAlpine moved to recoiinuend the Council approve the subdivision and conditional use permit as outlined on Exhibit A dated October 11, 1978, for Happy Chef and Erickson Petroleum Corporation. Motion seconded by Walter Thompson. The following voted in favor: Walter Thompson and Mal MacAlpine. Tim Stone, Dick Matthews , Jerry Neher and Roman Roos voted no. Motion failed. Tim Stone moved to approve the October 11,: 1978, Planning Conanission minutes as amended. Motion seconded by Jerry Neher . = The following voted in favor: Roman Roos, Tim Stone, Dick Matthews , Jerry Neher, and Walter Thompson. Pat Swenson abstained. Motion carried. Dick Matthews moved to note the Council minutes of October 16, 1978 . Motion seconded by Walter Thompson and unanimously approved. PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ROY BARKS • Roman Roos called the hearing to order at 7 :45 p.m. with the following interested persons present : Gini and Roy Barke, 6901 Shawnee Lane Carol Watson, 1300 Greenwood Drive . . Dick Potz,_ 6881 Tecumseh Lane The Assistant City Planner read the official notice as published in the Carver County Herald. Mr.V Barke is proposing to construct a 60 foot radio antennae 12 feet from the- southeast corner. of his home= located- at 6901 Shawnee Lane. _ The antennae varies- in- width from 10-20 feet and is self-supporting with no guy wires. . - The Zoning Ordinance requires that a conditional use permit be obtained for any amateur radio transmission antennaes in a residential district.. Letters were received from Richard Potz and Arlis Gribovsky objecting ` to the antennae on grounds of visual appearance. Mr. Potz speaks of the possibility of over modulation onto neighboring radio and television receivers . Roy Barke - The tower is 60 feet to the top and in addition to that the antennae currently right now is nine feet above that . I mentioned 20 so that if I do want to .put some other type . antennae on top of that it would not fall outside that height limitation. The tower is aluminum, self-supporting tower and I have got it anchored. It ' s up . I don't _ know if you realize that. It would withstand -a wind of approximately 140 mph. • Planning Commission Meeting October 25 , 1978 -2- Dick Potz - I turned in a statement to the Planner. I thought I was going to be out of town tonight so if somebody wants to read that statement and if anybody has got any questions �.. or comments . Bob Waibel - I can read it into the record. "Gentlemen. I am concern about the installation of the amateur (ham) radio station and antenna at 6901 Shawnee Drive. On somewhat df a personal viewpoint, I don't think the 60 foot steel tower does much for the aesthetic value of the neighborhood. - More importantly, and as you probably know, Roy Barke is a ham radio operator licensed to broadcast up to 1,000 watts' of power. Therefore my primary concern is the television reception that- I- am going to experience in the future. •I have had the experience of living in another - community in years past near a ham radio operator and have listened to him broadcast over the television set. Some ham radio operators take the position that they are operating legally and the responsibility of the television interference is With the TV manufacturers that have not ' provided the- necessary filtering equipment . Roy Barke's radio station up to this point has not interfered with my television reception but that does not necessarily mean it will not in the future. I would hope that the Planning Commission, when recommending the conditional use permit, can stipulate that Roy Barke be required to provide the necessary filter equipment to his neighbors if his radio station starts interfering with television reception. Very truly yours, Richard C . Potz." In regards to the question about furnishing receivers to the neighbors if theirs should prove to be inadequate, the FCC does not uphold that position. _ I .talked with them yesterday. They do have a toll free number that they can be contacted where the complaints are filed and recorded and some actions are taken to try to mediate the problem. Roy Barke - I have installed traps on mine . Amateur radio a lot of - times I think has gotten a bad name due to its association or its similar frequencies with CB and this is unfortunate but I think the one difference you will note between amateur radio and CB, :expecially in the area of equipment, is that the equipment for amateur radio is considerably better quality.. I think there is sufficient grounds that show that you can eliminate that problem. I have submitted a petition amongst the neighbors in my area just to get their general feeling on it and if I am not causing them problem in appearance, they don't feel it's obstructive to the neighborhood and if I am not causing an interference problems to them, I asked them to sign that and this is the petition that I have gone to the neighbors within approximately a two block radius of my house. In addition to that, my next door neighbor Gordon Smida was going to be here tonight. He wrote a `• letter to the Council which I will turn over. Carol Watson - -I live two houses up the street. The tower is not unattractive and I really feel that if he wants to operate an amateur radio, we have got 3/4 acre lots Planning Commission Meeting October 25 , 1978 -3- out there and I really feel if we are going to have to start regulating our hobbies and checking with everybody, now we have to check because we have a cat, pretty soon it gets to the point where we are going to have to ask the City Council anything we want to do . It 's not an unattractive tower. It ' s been there for a while. Walter Thompson - How long have you had this equipment installed? - Roy Barke - I have been an amateur now for a little over four months . The tower has been up for a month and a half. Walter Thompson — Were you not aware of the requirements? Roy Barke - I first was aware of it. I talked to individuals and I was very disturbed by the price that. was quoted to me just to get- a permit and I talked to my neighbor Gordon Smida and he said he thought I misunderstood so he came back and talked to individuals and they said that I was totally wrong and he told me at that point that it was . misinterpretation so at that point he said go ahead there is no problem so that 's when I went ahead and this is sort- of the reverse kind of thing coming back. Walter Thompson - What- was the basis for your safety requirements of withstanding a 140 mph wind? Is that designed by the people who manufacture the tower? -. Roy Barke - No it' s not. My tower is sufficiently strong, I got a heavy duty tower that regardless of who much I would put up on the top it would still support at least a 100 mph wind. The base that I put in is 50% greater than what is recommended. Dick Matthews - We have a problem here, we have the tower installed . which I take it will not then conform to 60 feet away from the property. - - - - - Roy Barke - The tower does conform to that. It is 80 feet from the front of the lot, approximately the same from the back and the same from the other side. - Dick Matthews - If it fell over it would not come in contact with any building? } Tim Stone - Except his own. - - Roy Barke - That' s right. Bob Waibel - I will read the letter from Gordon Smida. "Gentlemen. In regards- to Roy Barke; his-.radio operation does not interfere with anything if it did I would have told him ,so and I livenext- door. As for looks , it is nothing different than the up-coming solar panels that are sure to be coming to homes or the single blade windmills to propel power. This is coming to many homes in the future. " Walter Thompson moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Tim Stone and unanimously approved. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ROY BARKE : - Jerry Neher - I am somewhat concerned. about interference with 'TV as well as stereo because I have gone through it for the last seven years now from the ready mix plant and also my neighbor across the street who is no longer there so I don't have that interference anymore. We have had our equipment tested and the only response we have gotten is that it' s your baby your equipment isn't right. I don't think that is the attitude that we should have. Planning Commission Meeting October 25 , 1978 - -4- . Roy Barke - In talking to all of the people I have always stated that if I am a problem I would like you to tell me so that we can work together to eliminate the problem. I don't want to become the scape goat for every problem in the neighborhood but I have always stated I would actually assist the people to either attach a filter to the source of it or- to remedy the situation. Even without the tower I have been on the air in different antenna' s which are less efficient which do cause more problems with interference and I have been on the air since the first . part of June and I have had no complaints in that area. - When you- look at amateur radio or any type of transmitting the higher the antenna the less problem you are going to have. You do have a limitation on how high you can go 'and that type of thing but-what I do have is at a reasonable height so that I don't have that problem as much as I would if I had to go down to a real small antenna which is almost on the ground or a wire antenna along the house which would be a greater risk for the neighborhood. Walter Thompson moved to recommend the Council grant a conditional use permit for the erection of an amateur radio transmission antenna at 6901 Shawnee Drive and that the setback will be such as the height of the tower and antenna will not fall outside the lotline . The permit will be subject to review- upon complaints by neighbors . Motion seconded by Tim -Stone and unanimously approved. PUBLIC HEARING SUBDIVISION AND REZONING - RICHARD ERSBO Roman Roos called the hearing to order at 8 : 10 p .m. with the following interested persons present : Richard Ersbo Bob Petersen Wendell Gravelun . The Assistant City Planner read the official notice as published in the Carver County Herald. Mr. Ersbo submitted a revised plan showing recommended changes to the City Engineer. The Assistant City Planner -did not receive a copy. Dick Matthews moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Walter Thompson and unanimously approved. Hearing closed at 8 :15 p .m. SUBDIVISION AND REZONING - RICHARD ERSBO : " Dick Matthews moved to table action until November 9, 1978, to give staff time to review the revised plan. Motion seconded by Pat Swenson and unanimously approved. • RILEY/PURGATORY CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT: The watershed district has requested all proposals of one acre of larger be sent to them for review and comment . CITYOF 9. • CHANHASSEN , =• 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 PLANNING REPORT DATE: November 16, 1978 TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel SUBJ: Variance and Subdivision Request, 6225 Ridge Road APPLICANT: Dr. James Meyer PLANNING CASE: P-582 Petition Dr. Meyer is requesting to subdivide the subject property and in doing so is requesting variances to record the subdivision by metes and bounds and also to create parcels not fronting on a public s t The subject proposal is to subdivide the property at o225 Ridge Road into three residential sites, the northerly most parcel, neither one with the Meyer's residence and parcel A containing 2 .93 acres and parcel B containing 2.08 acres . Background 1. Community Location: As shown in enclosure 1, the subject property is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Ridge Road and Pleasant View Road. 2. Existing Zoning: The subject property is presently zoned R-1, single family residential district. The properties adjacently east and south of the subject property are presently zoned R-la, agricultural residential district. 3. Utilities : Presently sanitary sewer and municipal water are available to the subject property. Planner' s Comments Sanitary sewer runs along the eastern boundary of the subject property, and municipal water and sanitary sewer abut the subject property along - Ridge Road. The property in question has been assessed one sewer and `, water lateral and trunk unit. 1 I ' Mr. Don Ashworth -2- November 16 , 1978 Ridge Road which runs along the west side of the subject property is not a public street. Subdivision ordinance 33 requires that all parcels subdivided have 90 feet of frontage on a public street. The staff concerns have been for the applicant to assure that potential purchasers of parcels A and B have unrestricted access rights to and along Ridge Road. This has been furnished in the proposed lot } division legal description as shown on the attached sketch plans. The Planning Commission duly held a public hearing on the subject proposal on October 11, 1978 and subsequently moved to recommend that the city council approve the subdivision and variances for the 1 Meyer request. The applicant was also advised to gain assurances of unrestricted access to Ridge Road and to investigate any potential drainage problems in the area. As previously mentioned, the proposed sketch plan attached hereto does contain a proviso for access to Ridge Road and additionally the city engineer and myself have found that the subject property does have suitable conditions for building with respect to drainage. Planner's Recommendation I recommend that the city council look with favor upon this request with the following reasons and conditions: a. That the proposed metes and bounds legal description does not appear to make the cumulative_description overly cumbersome. b. That the subject property be assessed additional unit assessments as per public improvement project 75-10. 1 c. That proper provisions be made to assure unrestricted access rights to parcels A and B onto Ridge Road. d. That no public benefit is realized in making Ridge Road a public street. PLANNING REPORT -3- November 16, 1978 `-- Manager' s Comments It is not easy to say you have goofed, but this office failed to discuss this issue with the planner prior to presentation to the Planning Commission. In review, neither the attorney nor myself can concur with the recommendation of division by metes and bounds descriptions. Specifically, the City has allowed property transfers and divisions in the agricultural areas by metes and bounds, i.e. "the NW a of Section 12" , etc. Also, Staff has previously endorsed, where other factors have warranted the division, lot splits in existing platted residential areas, i.e. , "the east 50 ' of Lot 1, Block 1, Western Hills 1st Addition" . In these cases a clean line was established and questions as the location or specific description is readily recognizable. However, this request does not meet either of the two examples sited above. This fact coupled with the belief that the new description, if approved by the Council, will create numerous headaches and costs for future owners, the City, county, etc. over the next 10, 20, or 100 years forces this office to strongly recommend that approval additionally be conditioned upon platting of the property. I recognize that the cost to the applicant will be increased, but I would reference the Council to the description for these parcels if approved as presented, i .e. the new description would be both the added parcel A description and the old description as well as again duplicating this process for the parcel description. This does not appear in line with previous Council requirements or actions. 2.1400-1 . • jrUTtY Gi iff Christmas _ } kT: _ • 4. �, Jei• , •' j," r • • • r � -Ia•• — .-, ' N.• . � A#I _ • io 441, Fi el . -- ,--I ''.***-V.c, li ,o__, :. f-n, I • qllg - . , ... _.- . 'tL _.-1-: //, )e,4,4, i ...... _ . i ,&: • EN, . A :. . .1g.-,4, ( ., Alger Aiit liCY\ _ - . lic.g mint I. .IEAV- \,. '.-!..\0.A././. . _ a , e�ee��eF- Lotus C Luc `tiE o p��i _ k .�� • :�D�\� "' r • aoq� C_ �' ' `�G Ala • (021tA.43,_ 1i '• 4.-= Lake\.,,, • .F ♦ ��1 1 i PK �dazi COCCX.r ••\�� . _ ---\ - ireaOfCQp� al �'6\\0 .; • cl �p i�U ciu vut'�i t'7n \•A ' ' Kr,no c- .r. ,e! . r0'fl ..., igr'''-'7:;-"288&prl5A551,1 407.::10:11 `MEDIA�-E r•��-I-. 0 ® ® --..,.,•.. 'GC" gi • •F . Li_._Il MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII--_• tiptg: S CIII • d■ • 1p�r . to .+,.,' >�s • .. L I fir- k /: ,E). lir- - • t !hiI Lake Susan to r \ ' , '`�Rice ili s j�0•0 Marsh �� 1 �» . r Lake_ ^y��: -- - - -r •F GZ__e SU/e.6 Fc/ 34 s+o _ o l� '�l'i ( I I f "°4 34 Planning Commission Meeting September 13 , 1978 -11- 1 • JAMES MEYER LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCE: Dr. Meyer is requesting to subdivide, through a lot split into two residential sites, and is b requesting a variance to record this lot split in a metes and bounds description and subdivide without access onto a public street . The property is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Ridge Road and Pleasant View Road. Sanitary sewer and water are available to the property. The property is served by Ridge Road which is a private street . Dick Matthews moved to hold a public hearing on October 11 , 1978 , to consider a lot split for Dr. James Meyer. Motion seconded by Tim Stone and unanimously approved. BRUCE CAMERON, REZONING REQUEST: Mr. Cameron is requesting rezoning to R-2 on his property at 6291 Blue Jay Circle. The house is currently a duplex. The Cameron's are selling the home and to• obtain financing for prospective buyers it is necessary to rezone . Jerry Neher moved to hold a public hearing on October 11, 1978 , to consider rezoning the subject duplex from R-1 to R-2 . Motion seconded by Dick Matthews and unanimously approved. SUBDIVISION REOUEST - ROBERT SOMMER: Mr . Sommer is proposing to subdivide Lot 9 , Murray Hill Addition and part of Lot D, Bardwell Acres into four lots . Prior to a public hearing Mr. Sommer must submit a plan demonstrating how the western portion of Lot 29 will comply with the frontage requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The Assistant City Planner recouuuended that the Planning Commission hold a public hearing on the proposal contingent upon the following : 1. That the applicant submit a sketch plan for Lots A, B, C, and D to be reviewed by the Planning Commission at their September 27 meeting. Such plan to show the relationship of these lots to the western portion of Lot 29 , Murray Hill. 2. That an escrow deposit be posted with the City Treasurer on or before September 20, 1978, to defray staff costs in processing this application. Jerry Neher moved to hold a public hearing on October 11, 1978, to consider the Robert Sommer subdivision request. Motion seconded by Dick Matthews and unanimously approved. Jerry Neher moved to adjourn. Motion seconded by Dick Matthews and unanimously approved. Don Ashworth City Manager C `REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 11, 1978 , , Prior to the meeting members Huderviewed HollenbacktonwtheoPlanTally ning Couaissionnd Lu Ann Wallentine to replace Members recommended the Council appoint Pat Swenson. . Roman Roos called the meeting to order at 7 :30 p.m. with the following members present: Dick Matthews , Mal MacAlpine, Tim Stone, Jerry Neher, and Walter Thompson. MINUTES: Dick Matthews moved to approve the September 13 , 1978 , Planning Commission minutes . Motion seconded by Jerry Neher . The following voted in favor: Roman Roos , Dick Matthews , Jerry Neher, and Tim Stone . Walter Thompson and Mal MacAlpine abstained. Motion carried. Walter Thompson moved to approve the September 27 , 1978 , Planning Commission minutes . Motion seconded by Dick Matthews and unanimously approved. s E Dick Matthews moved to note the September 11, 1978 , Council minutes . tMotion seconded by Mal MacAlpine and unanimously approved. t Jerry Neher moved to note the September 18 , 1978 , Council minutes . Motif seconded by Walter Thompson and unanimously approved. I Walter Thompson moved to note the October 2, 1978 , Council minutes . Motion seconded by Jerry Neher and unanimously approved. RESIGNATION: Dick Matthews moved to accept Hud Hollenback' s resignation from the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Walter Thompson and t unanimously approved. - . • . r , ,�..- PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES STUDY COMMITTEE : t Jerry Neher moved to appoint Tim Stone as Planning Couudission I representative to the Community Facilities Study Committee . Notion seconded by Dick Matthews and unanimously approved. JOINT MEETING WITH ECOLOGICAL COMITTEE: No members of the Ecological Committee were present. Planning Commission members would like to revie the charge of the Ecological Committee atia future meeting . PUBLIC HEARING SUBDIVISION REQUEST, DR. JAMES MEYER Roman Roos called the public hearpa order read the$offiP a1 notice asMeyer 'was present. The Assistant City lnner published in the Carver County Herald. Dr. Meyer is requesting approval to subdivide his property at 6225 Ridge Road into two lots and requesting a variance to record the lots in a metes and bounds description and subdivide without access onto a public street. . . The Assistant City Planner recommended that-. the applicant prepare a . plan showing the proposed building sites outlined by elevations , agreements suitable to the City Attorney that assure that the lots created would have access rights to Ridge Road and documentation which will outline the ground- floor elevations of proposed structures . Jerry Neher moved to close the public-hearing Alotion seconded by Dick Matthews and unanimously approved. Hearing closed at 8 :21 p .m. • 1 . . `Planning Commission Meeting October 11 , 1978 - -2- SUBDIVISION RE UEST, DR. JAMES MEYER: Tim Stone moved to recommend t e Counci approve t e su ivision and variances for Dr . Meyer and that the applicant work with staff to enter the conditions into the sale contract (road easement, proper elevation of new home to avoid drainag( problems) . Motion seconded by Dick Matthews and unanimously approved. PUBLIC HEARING SUBDIVISION REQUEST AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT HAPPY CHEF AND ERICKSON PETROLEUM CORPORATION Roman Roos called the hearing to order at 8 :40 p .m. with the following interested persons present :L. Zamor, J . Zamor, D. Zamor, Charles Towle, Robert Frederick, Richard Rice, John_ Lee, Bill Brezinsky, and Craig Mertz . The Assistant City Planner read the official notice as published in the Carver County Herald. The Assistant City Planner gave his report dated October 11, 1978 . Bob Waibel - Due to the existence of the building moratorium ordinance 47-K and being that this proposal was the first to prove to be a possible impediment to the downtown concept plan, there has developed several problems which have made the • review of the proposal significantly more difficult than usual. It was my opinion that the development be looked at solely in the context of general land use and the . intentions of the HRA keeping the green space as shown in the downtown concept plan. As you well know, site plan considerations had entered into the discussion necessarily for the HRA to decide upon the extent of their • ` green area. After reviewing the most recent plan presented to the HRA and the Planning CoiwlLission, I have serious reservations about my recommendation of September 11, 1978, concerning the entire development . Further study of the site plan has revealed some glaring deficits of the plan in it ' s relationship to the spirit and intent of the adopted city ordinances . First of all the proposed dual uses to be placed on what was originally created to be a single purpose property presents various problems such as four curb cuts in a relatively short distance along West 79th Street, the curb cut nearest to the intersection of Highway 101 would allow for less than adequate stacking distance for cars which could create confusion among motorists , and that the plan proposes less than the setback as prescribed by ordinance for the parking area abutting the right-of-way of Highway 101. I believe that there is a strong liklihood that there will be significant pedestrian traffic between the two facilities, and since no trash container area for Holiday is indicated, this would be the likely spot for the containers which in the end would detract from both ' developments. My notes made on the subject proposal further substantiate it as being over developed for the parcel in question, however, based on the content of this report , I would have 'to recommend that the Planning Commission encourage the applicant to acquire more land or reduce the magnitude /0. CITY OF - . CHANHASSEN • 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 PLANNING REPORT DATE : November 16, 1978 TO: Mr. Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel SUBJ: Front Yard Variance Request, 822 Carver Beach Road APPLICANT: Larry Dahl Petition Mr. Dahl is proposing to construct an attached garage and family room to the existing residence at the address mentioned above and in doing so is requesting a front yard setback variance of 24 feet. Ordinance 47 require that properties in an R-1 district maintain a 30 foot front yard setback. Background Community Location: As shown in enclosure 1, the subject property is located on the north side of Elm Road between Nez Perce and Mandan Drive. Existing Zoning: The subject property and it' s environs is presently zoned R-1, single family residential district. Planner's Comments As mentioned in the attached application, the applicant is requesting a variance to the exceptional grade (18%) of Elm Street in front of the subject residence. Elm Road is in effect a one way street going to the east as a result of Mandan Drive being a one way street to the north at a point where West 68th Street intersects Mandan Drive, thus the only approach to the Dahl residence is from the west on a down grade. It is the opinion of this office that there are numerous options available to the applicant to construct a double garage in conformance with the city zoning ordinance, such as extensive excavation to alleviate the deceleration problems from the downgrade approach, the acquisition of adjacent property in order to carry out appropriate excavation to alleviate the problem, and to petition the city to consider the changing of the one way status of Mandan Drive and Elm Road to provide for upgrade access. Mr. Don Ashworth -2- November 16, 1978 The Board of Adjustment and Appeals duly held a public hearing on November 7, 1978, and voted to recommend approval of the variance as requested due to the extreme topographic problems. Planner's Recommendation I recommend that the city council deny the request and urge the applicant to pursue the aforementioned courses of action as potential solutions to accommodate the property with a garage in conformance with the provisions as set forth in ordinance 47. gA4-11) Action tl City, adir*Is;t'1t i E :Icri :i C::... coi3rnissicr 7-7 t�I III { 2.1400-1 . iive S Christmas r _- -- 1 f 1'tI....iI.\fAv, (/ii loi 1mi1 iwpip4i 11 0 m d 1®Lake ar •` I.i . L ifit • . it -i -A\47 ```�►�• .F ,4,1.'• is A 1kb.,,I,41 '''"• .�b.' . 1O'eQ Alm ` , r ��. o 1 • = ,.. .. ,7 0,0p 474r".. \ 4wI = e is.......,..„......irri,M.„ . f•,-,:+•-Or ,, ------- ,;,.. tift, ( • 5.i;)/3'r 1111104 • odd..■■ =Pi% 1\•m, *'a el Iie eglk:4-F,,,_,-''•. sou. „.._. s,+.1, ,.,3,,, 1.0000.00-• •i, , . .-Sf,R* :.1 b,l0l%c1ii �o,4WTY take ucy Q e O rli _ — �� l t`GQO,OV --Elms i----i-c-.,--_-_--__-,-.-.413 DC I.Lt I-, 1 1 pi•em 1[Er . 1 ♦ ) iar.) ,A21.,:gagall a..+ ,Emil r • 'c= '`1 •F 1 • 74.5�\ Lake • '�` PK ▪ •• • •r ��. . ,....,_ 11 1 • ...yyyryyyy.��y�.., rta: 11... .\k‘f=1 \.,\CII.111 ;.;;;cam° a . •F ��C Dy • ICI ._ fir —f-3'Gs+Oflcrnn•. alj , I �i O v�i�s*I4[41[4.96V s BM c� n. _LO �1 • ao nr�0 , 1 i'iLJ 4 no na SV ..Cr1� 1 11(� �'� • .till ID ® ® Lk:�trJf�®�,� • •F •F leg •F ■11AI� /• ••3 S . • *r . Iril � . wFe . ter /% • ►K . I :T11;; , /�Q Marsh ./ ` Lake Z, • •F ' OF •F 1 I 1 C ]i 7r' ��- I __ __ __— t - 11 1 "---.."4;-- r. - . ! l I ~ i ! I I i I I i i I r - �- + - i 1 I i I I i �. I- . 1 I , I — `I _I 1 a 1 I ._ :._..._..: I .---:: ::.: I ! e.a-- .... 1 ...-. 1 "1j — f - - , : 1i 1I III ! IIi i 2 '� - - ' 7. 1 -,L, + i j --—-s — ---Y--- a -, --- -- • I i. -•I , ., , ,1 .. I I 1 I -.-f f _i i �• f ems. . , 4._ 4 . 1 i ` Ii 1 K . ;._ . ., Tea ; • I i • ;{ — i_ ,. 7. ---N -=--- i----4-__,----•-I- - - - , { f 1 I i t _ _ - f i i 1 �. . i 1 • ! - I f -�---F---I- _ I I I 1. - or I ! �— —r ` I f I ! ! _ I I I ! - I I i i i -. _�. _ r i — . 1 i I { i ` . 1 I ! 1 : •, I , . i : 1 _ _.1_, __i_._-__, ..1...._ i ... _ _ __ ._ __ _;__ ___-...... _._4__ _._. .. __.i..._ ...„ ..'..---...... .-"1.- -1-.----- I -.... 1. :T.- I 1 I , . I ' : • i - i I I I • i : . I r I : • . . : --- , .0 ,,_c--(./. 1 i 1 ---4 . : ---. - --7-----Ii • -- ___i_ -,-------4--- ! i • 1. . i. : ... .___i. ' ....1. _i _._____ -L---t li I I 1 1 I ; I ' I i ;C)-•C -- -4 -I- -± --7 I- ._ . : i • I , . I , I i • I - i i • : . , s--s--4. i .. , ... i • • i i A ,.___. __.,_ . , i ,r • 1 : ! I 1 . I ;i .--r-- . . ; ,_ . ,........,... ,. , i , .: ; • 1 1 1 1 , 1., •, - ,,, , : ! .1 t.4 11 - i. 1,, __Ii 1: .-.._ _I T. A. .. _.__• ; iI --..1;,..----,.. .• .. . I1iii 22)1;'t,.:•s 1III -I _ -r- -I T- 1 q II _ . , ; , I , __. , I - . -I- --r -- -- . , i 1 . . . i • „ . 1 1 i , I --1- i ) , ! • 1 II i . : i i 1 _i_ 1 i 1 1 : -1--- : 1 1 1—t- -4--7.----t---' i 1 I 'I. 1 i . d i 7 1 i I • 7. -7- , • --t--- --:-----t ' ! _ .._ I ' 11 t_.._{____. _____--. 1 .. •i . --I.- 2S43 I 1 -1- i_ II --; - •_4 -1,- , . , , ,, -4- •t r- -. t- I I .I . ; , . j ! • 1 I , I 1 • . . , : 1 I-1- ill 1____ 1 - 1 1 T 1 •- ---t- i. . , ; II . 'r , • ; I I ; 1 I . " ! -1- • 7 . ' - 1. ' 'I'•- I --1---- . . --i . i -i , - - - -1 I i I I , I. I ; . : . -7.- I 1 I 1 • I -.I--.L. --1.- ----12-- it--- --lt • _ 25-81r , • , „ , , , , . , , . , , , . • I , H . , •, . , • _ 1 i I . • I 4---t-- i. 1 , • _._ ____' _;:__i 11 -11 - --; r. I ' l .' I _ ____' 4_,- , ; ,. 1 1 1 ; . , I, , 1N,, ', I . I ! : I I I. ! I 1 i 1 1 • 1 . .1 .. _.!24'---41 _.. .. ,__....1 ..... _ .... .1.25-140 : 1 -, .1 1 I is:7) 1 1 I , i _.4 _,..........4 , - • -I ! - i.. ,.. r ! - -, ; , . 1 1 i ! i 2 . ./ 1, .... . . .. . 1... „. . i .1. : ;• I I I 1 i . i 1 ---; 1 : --r- . -1- ' • 1- -i- I---''. 1 i , -I • ,• .,.. .___ _ , --14 , , •_._ I , • , , 1 I I I ' . _ ___..',... I I ! , ,..) • I i I 'I 1 j I I = , • ; • ; - i , 1 il il - ;- - ; ---: :, -- - ------ -I - -I' - - - - • -- i' .1 • ! i • 1 • • '. -I - , , 1 . III II ' . : - - - •-- • --4-, --;- ----1-----r---------1 -; 1 : 1 1-- --1 ! , ; ; • .: - - : • . - - -. . .. , .,- . . • . . . . . . , . • , •,: . • • . . .... , : -.ri . . _ C I TY CJ F CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE.P.O. BOX 147eCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth DATE: November 20, 1978 SUBJ: Development Contract Amendment, Chapparel (New Horizon Homes) Attached please find a copy of the development contract for Chapparel Phase I. Staff believes the proposed development contract is in accordance with previous planning commission and city council approvals. Staff has met with representatives of New Horizon Homes and they are in agreement with the terms and conditions of the development contract with the following exceptions: 1) . The developers have stated that they desire to delete two additional building lots from the approved plan presented to the planning commission and city council. These lots are located adjacent to the ponding area off Carver Beach Road. Council members discussed the feasibility of building on these lots when this was approved. 2) . The development contract forbids any occupancy permit from being issued if utilities are uncompleted and roads in maintainable condition. The developer desires to draw a building permit for six model homes, gaining access off Carver Beach Road to a temporary parking area. Staff believes this to be in accordance with the development contract and will issue an administrative agreement letter to this effect if the contract is approved. 3) . In approval of the development contract, the planning commission and council were concerned with the possibility of a large number of variances given the number of smaller lots in the plat. As such, the attorney has drafted this section of the development contract in the form of an absolute, i.e. no variance application shall be considered. Both staff and the developer are in •- agreement that the intent of both the City and Developer should be recognized regarding variances, but an "absolute prohibition" may be unreasonable. This office would recommend optional wordage which would spell out Mayor and Council -2- November 20, 1978 the intent of both parties and place additional responsibility on the developer to show the imperative need of the variance - yet not being an absolute prohibition. Staff would recommend approval of the development contract with the amendments shown above. Q�n� NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC. �� C4 BUILDING TOMORROWS DREAMS TODAY �•�`�'�' 3131 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH 1 �,5;% SUITE 104 ��<' PLYMOUTH,MINNESOTA 55441 612-559-5770 November 14, 1978 City of Chanhassen 710 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 ATTN: Mr. Donald Ashworth, City Manager RE: Chaparral, Phase 1 Dear Mr. Ashworth, Persuant to our discussion this morning, relative to the subject Project, I am personally requesting that my Company be allowed to construct and maintain for sales purposes only, six (6) single family model homes located in Chaparral in accordance to the attached certificates of survey from Suburban Engineering, Inc. I fully understand that no occupancy will be permitted other than maintaining a sales staff to properly exhibit the model homes for public visitation. We anticipate that the models will be used for approximately a three (3) year period. Because of the approaching Winter, it is imparitive we commence construction as quickly as possible before heavy frost sets in. In a different vein, I wish to address the possible problem with respect to the statement within the Development Contract covering no Variances (paragraph 26, page 8) . I understand fully the intent of both the Planning Commission and the City Council to eliminate the need for variances that would be in conflict with the City ordinances. As you are aware, my Company has gone through extensive engineering, such as pre-selection of the particular house design for a particular lot. We then grade the lot accordingly to match the lot and house. This is an important correlation because all of our grading is controlled and engineered, cut and fill operation. Mr. Donald Ashworth, City Manager Chaparral, Phase 1 (con't.) However, in the course of grading, it is slightly possible that because primarily of the tree location, it might be necess- ary to ask for a variance in order to preserve a large tree or group of trees that otherwise might have to be destroyed in order to strictly comply with the ordinances. I feel that no one would wish this happen, if a reasonable alternative could be found to save the trees. Therefore, I am also requesting that some flexibility be given to us within the frame work of the Development Contract that may preclude such an occurence from happening. It is my understanding that the Chaparral Final Plat will be brought before the City Council on Monday November 20, 1978, for Council action. At that time Mr. Ashworth, I would appreciate a Council response to my two request in this letter. Thanking you and your staff for the excellent cooperation we have received on this project, I remain. Sincerely, ( NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC. i 1 444,552-- Robert L. Burger, President RLB/jlp Attached. L CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLAT OF CHAPARRAL (FORMERLY CARVER' S POINTE) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of , 1978, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, and DUNN AND CURRY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, INC . , a Minnesota cor- poration, as fee owner and by NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC . , a corporation, as contract purchaser. (Said fee owner and said contract purchaser are hereinafter referred to collectively hereinafter as the Developer) , WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, The Developer is the owner of a tract of land lying within the City of Chanhassen and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the subject property is presently zoned R-lA, Agricultural Residence District; and WHEREAS, the Developer has made application under the City Zoning Ordinance for City Council approval of a Planned Residential Development District encompassing all of the subject property; said district and plat to contain approximately 46 . 5 acres more or less divided into approximately 100 single family residential lots in four blocks and to be known as Carver ' s Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North; and WHEREAS, the Developer, with the consent of the City, has changed the name of the proposed plat from "Carver 's Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North" to "Chaparral" ; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Planning Commission on March 8, 1978 , to consider public comment on said development plan, plat, and rezoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by its resolution dated April 3, 1978, has approved said rezoning to P-1 and the develop- ' ment plan and preliminary plat of the Developer, subject to and on condition that the Developer enter into this agreement; and WHEREAS, approval of the development plan and preliminary plat of the Developer necessitated the vacation of West 63th Street from the Nez Perce west to County Road No. 17; and -1- WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on May 1, 1978, to consider public comment on said vacation; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by its resolution dated May 1, 1978, has approved the vacation of that portion of West 68th Street which lies westerly of Nez Perce and easterly of County Road No. 17; and WHEREAS, the City has established a policy requiring land developers to furnish surfaced streets, curbs, boulevard sodding, gutters, driveways, storm and surface water drainage facilities, street signs and lighting, municipal water and sanitary sewer faci- lities and underground electric and telephone service lines to all lots in plats approved by the City, all of the foregoing hereinafter sometimes referred to as "improvements" ; and WHEREAS, the Developer has made application to the City to be allowed at Developer ' s expense to construct, install and perform all work and furnish all materials in connection with the installation of the following improvements : a. Street grading, stabilizing, and bituminous surfacing; b. Surmountable concrete curbs and gutters; c. Sanitary sewer mains; d. Water mains; e. Storm and surface water drainage; f. Street signs; g. Boulevard sodding or seeding; �... h. Driveway surfacing; i. Underground utility lines; and j . Street lighting. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and acceptance by the City of the preliminary development plan and plat of Chaparral, the City and the Developer agree as follows: 1. Improvements by Developer. Developer agrees at its expense to construct, install and perform all work and furnish all materials and equipment in connection with the installation of the following improvements in accordance with the preliminary plat described in Paragraph 28 below: a . Street grading, stabilizing, and bituminous surfacing; b. Surmountable concrete curbs and gutters; c . Sanitary sewer mains; d. Water mains; e. Storm and surface water drainage; f . Street signs; g. Boulevard sodding or seeding; h. Driveway surfacing within the public street right of way; i. Underground utility lines; and j . Street lighting. -2- 2 . Standards of Construction. The Developer agrees that all of the foregoing improvements shall equal or exceed City standards, shall be constructed and installed in accordance with engineering plans and specifications approved by the City engineers and the requirements of applicable City ordinances and standards, and that all of said work shall be subject to the supervision of the City engineers . 3 . Materials and Labor. All of the materials to be employed in the making of said improvements and all of the work performed in connection therewith shall be of uniformly good and workmanlike quality, shall equal or exceed City standards and specifications , and shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the City. In case any material or labor supplied shall be rejected by the City as defective or unsuitable, then such rejected material shall be removed and replaced with approved material, and rejected labor shall be done anew to the satisfaction and approval of the City at the cost and expense of the Developer. 4. Construction Traffic . All traffic of equipment, supplies, etc . , relating to the construction and installation of the improve- ments described in paragraph 1 above shall be limited to the use of MSAS 101. 5 . Schedule of Work. The Developer agrees that it shall have all work done and the improvements described above in Paragraph 1 fully completed to the satisfaction and approval of the City on or before , 19 • The Developer shall submit a written schedule indicating the proposed progress schedule and order of completion of work covered by this contract, which schedule shall be a part of this contract. Upon receipt of written notice from the Developer of the existence of causes over which the Developer has no control which will delay the completion of the work, the City, in its discretion, may extend the date hereinbefore specified for completion. 6 . Roads, Sanitary Sewer, Water, and Storm Sewer Facilities . a. Plans and Specifications. The Developer agrees to cause its engineers to prepare all plans and specifi- cations necessary for the installation of roads, curb, gutter, sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer facili- ties, including a final grading plan in and for said plat, said plans and specifications to be in substan- tial accord with the proposed plans thereof prepared by James R. Hill, Inc . , and dated January 6, 1978 , with the following modifications: i. Street right of ways within the plat shall be reduced to 50 feet. ii. The entire subdivision pattern shall be shifted 30 feet in an easterly direction. -3- • iii . The surface water drainage plan shall be subject to the approval of the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District Board of Managers . iv. The Developer, in conjunction with the building inspector, shall develop a street naming plan which precludes the possibility of confusion with existing street names . v. All plans and specifications shall be subject to the final approval of the City Engineer . b. As-Built Plan. Upon completion of construction, the Developer shall cause its engineers to prepare and file with the City an "as built" plan showing the installation of the foregoing facilities within the plat. c. Easements . The Developer, at its expense, shall acquire all easements from abutting property owners necessary to the installation of the sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water facilities within the plat, and thereafter promptly assign said easements to the City. In addition, the Developer, for itself and for its successors and assigns, agree to convey to the City at no cost to the City, the easements which are more particularly described on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. 7 . Reimbursement of Costs . The Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs, including reasonable engineering, legal, planning and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection with all matters relating to the administration and enforcement of the within agreement and the performance thereby by the Developer. 8 . Disclaimer by City. It is understood and agreed that the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City shall not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the Developer, the Developer 's contractors or sub-contractors, material- men, laborers, or to any other person, firm or corporation whomsoever, for any debt, claim, demand, damages, actions or causes of action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the execution of this agreement or the performance and completion of the work and improvements hereunder; and that the Developer will save the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City harmless from any and all claims, damages, demands, actions or causes of action arising therefrom and the costs, disbursements, and expenses of defending the same. 9 . Written Work Orders. The Developer shall do no work nor furnish materials not covered by the plans and specifications for which reimbursement is expected from the City unless a written order for such work or materials is received from the City. Any such work • -4- • or materials which may be done or furnished by the Developer without N..e, such written order first being given shall be at its own risk, cost and expense, and Developer hereby agrees that without such written order, Developer will make no claim for compensation for work or materials so done or furnished. 10 . Performance Bond. For the purpose of assuring and guaran- teeing to the City that the improvements to be by the Developer constructed, installed and furnished as set forth in Paragraph 1 hereof shall be constructed, installed and furnished according to the terms of this agreement, and that the Developer shall pay all claims for work done and materials and supplies furnished for the performance of this agreement and that the Developer shall fully comply with all of the other terms and provisions of this Development Contract. Developer agrees to furnish to the City either a cash deposit, a corporate surety bond approved by the City and naming the City as obligee thereunder, or an irrevocable letter of credit approved by the City in the following amount $519, 370 . 00 . 11 . Boulevards and Driveways . The Developer agrees to furnish, construct and install, at Developer ' s sole expense, the following improvements for the benefit of each lot within the plat in accordance with the preliminary plat described in Paragraph 23 below: a. Boulevard sod or seeding, either of which shall be of uniformly good quality. b. Driveway surfacing within the public street right-of- way, the materials and installation of which shall be approved by the City Engineers . 12 . Erosion Control . Developer, at its expense, shall provide temporary dams, earthwork or such other devices and practices, including seeding or graded areas, as shall be needed, in the judgment of the City Engineers, to prevent the washing, flooding, sedimen- tation and erosion of lands and roads within and outside the plat during all phases of construction, including construction on indivi- dual lots. Developer shall keep all streets free of all dirt and debris resulting from construction by the Developer, its agents or assignees upon the lands described in Exhibit A hereto. 13 . Access . Reasonable access, including temporary grading and gravelling, shall be provided to all occupied residences in the plat until the streets are accepted by the City. 14 . Street Lighting. The expense of furnishing electrical energy for street lighting purposes shall be assumed by the City 24 months after completion of installation of the street lighting system, or after 50% of the building lots have been approved by the construction of residences thereon, whichever is first to occur . -5- • 15. Replacement of Defective Work. All work and materials performed and furnished hereunder by the Developer, its agents and subcontractors, found by the City to be defective within one year after acceptance by the City, shall be replaced by Developer at Developer ' s sole expense. 16 . Liability Insurance. The Developer shall take out and maintain so long as the Developer' s obligations under Paragraphs 1 and 15 above continue, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer ' s work or the work of its subcontractors, or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury or death shall be not less than $100, 000 for one person and $300, 000 for each accident; limits for property damage shall be not less than $100, 000 for each accident. The City shall be named as co-insured on said policy and the Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City. 17 . Water and Sewer Revenues . All water and sanitary sewer service charges shall at all times be billed by the City and all revenues derived therefrom shall be the sole property of the City. 18 . Conveyance of Improvements . Upon completion of the installation by the Developer of the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1 hereof in accordance with the plans and specifications - hereunder and the written approval by the City, the Developer shall convey said improvements to the City free of all liens and encum- brances and with warranty of title. Should the Developer fail to so convey said improvements, the same shall become the property of the City without further notice or action on the part of either party hereto, other than acceptance by the City. 19 . Restrictive Covenants. Any proposed covenants or restric- tions to be placed upon the lots in said plat shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles . 20. Building Permits and Occupancy Permits. Upon completion of the grading and placement of rock stabilizing materials for road construction within said plats, the City Building Inspector, upon the approval of the City Manager, shall be authorized to issue building permits for residential construction within said plats upon payment of all fees and charges applicable to the issuance of permits. The occupancy of any structure within said plats for residential purposes shall be prohibited by the City until the rock stabilizing base of the streets shall have been completed and municipal sanitary sewer and water lines shall have been installed and are available to serve the lot for which a building permit shall have been issued. -6- 21. Remedies Upon Default. a. Assessments . In the event the Developer shall default in the performance of any of the covenants and agree- ments herein contained, and such default shall not have been cured within ten days after receipt by the Deve- loper of written notice thereof, the City, if it so elects, may cause any of the improvements described in Paragraph 1 above to be constructed and installed or may take action to cure said default and may cause the entire cost thereof, including all reasonable engineering, legal and administrative expense incurred by the City, to be recovered as a special assessment under M.S . Chap. 429, in which case the Developer agrees to pay the entire amount of the assessment role pertaining to any such improvement within thirty days after its adoption. Developer further agrees that in the event of its failure to pay in full any such special assess- ment within the time prescribed herein, the City shall have a specific lien on all of Developer' s real property within said plat for any amount so unpaid, and the City shall have the right to foreclose said lien in the manner prescribed for the foreclosure of mechanic ' s liens under the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of an emergency, as determined by the City Engineers, the notice requirements to the Developer shall be and hereby are waived in their entirety, and the Developer shall reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City in remedying the conditions creating the emergency. b. Performance Bond. In addition to the foregoing, the City may also institute legal action against the Developer and the corporate surety on its performance bond, or utilize any cash deposit made or letter of credit delivered hereunder, to collect, pay or reim- burse the City for the cost of making any of said improve- ments, or for the cost of curing any default by the Developer in its performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein. c. Legal Proceedings. In addition to the foregoing, the City may institute any proper action or proceeding at law or at equity to prevent violations of the within development contract, to restrain or abate violations of the within development contract, or to prevent use of occupancy of the proposed dwellings. 22 . Special Conditions. Landscaping and location of structures on individual lots shall be determined through discussions between City staff and Developer or their assigns prior to issuance of building permits, subject to the following standards and conditions : a. Landscaping and location of structures shall take into �.. consideration the preservation of trees, slope protec- tion, subsurface drainage, prevention of siltation and -7- similar potential problems. b. In the event agreement cannot be reached between the City Staff and Developer or their assigns, the City shall have the right, at the expense of the Developer or its assigns, to engage the services of the City Engineer, Planner, a landscape architect, a soil con- servation consultant and others, to advise as to specific problems. c . Developer shall prepare and submit to the City for its approval a landscape plan for the screening and buffering of the lots abutting CSAH 17 and MSAS 101 . Said land- scape plan may incorporate earth berms , plant materials and fences . d. The certificate of occupancy for each homesite, or covenants and restrictions, may contain conditions for tree maintenance, and restrictions on tree removal, after consultations with the City Forester . e. Individual site drainage, basement waterproofing and footing drains for each residential structure shall be installed when necessary or appropriate . 23. Receipt of Engineers ' Report Acknowledged. Developer acknowledges receipt of the report of Schoell & Madson, Inc. , City Engineers, dated January 31, 1978, relating to existing water and sewer services to serve the plat, and agrees to be bound by the �... determination of the City regarding any redistribution of existing assessments, and the imposition of supplemental assessments as defined in Paragraph 29 below. 24 . Easements to be Shown on Plat. Easements for drainage, storm water holding ponds, City access to storm water holding ponds for maintenance purposes, and utility easements shall be shown on the final plat. 25. Trees to be Provided. The Developer shall provide each lot with one boulevard tree of a specie acceptable to the City Forester and of a diameter of not less than 1-1/2" . 26 . No Variances . The Developer acknowledges that the City has approved the subject plat with the understanding that the Developer has thoroughly studied lot configurations depicted on the subject plat and that the Developer is satisfied that no variances from the front yard setbacks and side yard setbacks depicted on the Developer ' s "Setbacks and Lot Areas" plan dated January 6, 1978 , a copy of which is on file in the office of the City 's Zoning Administrator, will be necessary. -8- �,. .7--r ..._...- Law!wKr-.-<.::•-e-.r.vr"? r.—Y.ar...vM.-.•..•...v:..c.;;�..r �.....nc�,�s.� a.:.�.... ..n,...rr.sa+.w-.c+...av,.w.yuc.-r.•�,-+a.-.a..---,w.a,-.,..... .... •. _.,.... ,...t 27 . Address of Developer. The address of the Developer for purposes of this development contract is New Horizon Homes , Inc . , 3131 Fernbrook Lane, Plymouth, Minnesota, 55441 . 28 . Final Plat. The Developer agrees to proceed immediately with the preparation of its final plat, which shall conform to its approved preliminary plat as prepared by James R. Hill, Inc . , and dated January 6, 1978 with the following modifications : a. Street rights of way within the plat shall be reduced to fifty feet in width. b. The entire subdivision pattern shall be shifted thirty feet in an easterly direction. c. The number of lots in Block 3 shall be reduced from thirty lots to a maximum of twenty-eight lots . d. The number of lots in the northerly half of Block 1 shall be reduced from six lots to a maximum of five lots. 29 . Special Assessment Payment Schedule. a. Developer Consents to Supplemental Assessment. The Developer acknowledges that the subject property derives special benefit from the sewer lift station facilities, trunk and lateral sanitary sewer facilities, and trunk and lateral water facilities which were con- structed as a part of Chanhassen Improvement Project 75-2 (Carver Beach Sewer and Water Project, ) and as a part of Chanhassen Improvement Project 75-3 (Greenwood Shores Sewer and Water Project. ) The Developer acknowledges that the amount of said special benefit so derived from Project 75-2 and Project 75-3 exceeds the amount of the special assess- ments levied pursuant to Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes by resolutions of the Chanhassen City Council adopted and dated October 6, 1976 . The amount of said excess is One Hundred Sixty-Three Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Nine Dollars ($163, 579 . 00) , which sum is hereinafter referred to as the "Project 75-2/75-3 supplemental assessments" or as the "Project 75-2 supplemental assessments" and the "Project 75-3 supplemental assessments. " The developer agrees that the entire amount of the Project 75-2/75-3 supplemental assessments -9- shall be paid by the Developer as special assessments levied against the properties proposed plat in twenty- six (26) equal semi annual installments, together with interest on unpaid installments at the rate of seven and one-half (7 1/2%) percent per annum accruing from October 6, 1976 . Said semi annual installments shall commence on May 30, 1979 , with installments due on the 31st day of each October thereafter and the 30th day of each May thereafter until October 31, 1991, on which date any remaining principal balance plus accrued interest shall be paid. Said semi annual installments shall be inclusive of and applied first to accrued interest and the remainder shall be applied to reduce principal. The Developer shall have the right and privilege to prepay the full amount of the then outstanding Project 75-2 supplemental assessments or the full amount of the then outstanding Project 75-3 supplemental assessments, together with accrued interest thereon, at any time . b. Developer Waives Public Hearing and Right of Appeal. The Developer waives its right to public hearing under §429 . 061 and 429 .071 of Minnesota Statutes and its right of appeal under §429 . 081 of Minnesota Statutes as to the Project 75-2 supplemental assess- ments and as to the Project 75-3 supplemental assess- ments . c. Acceleration of Payment Schedule. In the event that an occupancy permit is applied for for any residential structure constructed upon any lot in the proposed plat, the payment of the Project 75-2 supplemental assessments and the Project 75-3 supplemental assessments shall be accelerated as provided in Paragraph 29 (d) below. d. Payments Due Prior to Occupancy. No residential structure within the proposed plat shall be occupied until the developer has paid in full all unpaid special assessments levied against the lot on which said structure has been erected. The term "all unpaid special assessments" shall be deemed to include: i. Any outstanding City sewer and water hook-up charges and any charges owing to Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. ii . One ninty-fifth (1/95) of the total amount of the Project 75-2 supplemental assessments , including accrued interest thereon, less the sum of any principal payments made theretofore and applied against said Project 75-2 supplemental assessments. iii. One ninty-fif.th . (1/95) of the total amount of the Project 75-3 supplemental assessments, including accrued interest thereon, less the sum of any -10- • principal payments made theretofore and applied against said Project 75-3 supplemental assessments , and iv. One ninty-fifth (1/95) of the then outstanding principal balance, together with accrued interest thereon of the Project 75-2 and Project 75-3 special assessments which were levied by the Chanhassen City Council by resolutions adopted October 6, 1976 . 30 . Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that they are fee owners of the subject property. 31. Successors and Assigns . It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that the agreement herein contained shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of their respective legal representa- tives, successors and assigns . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed on the day and year first above written. NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC. DUNN AND CURRY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, INC . By By Its Its t And And Its Its CITY OF CHANHASSEN By Its Mayor Attest: I City Manager F STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF CARVER ) ss . On this day of , 1978 , before me, a notary public within and for said county, personally appeared Walter Hobbs and Donald W. Ashworth, to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the c Mayor and City Manager of the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its City Council, and said Watler Hobbs and Donald W. Ashworth acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF ) ss . On this day of , 1978 , before me, a notary public within and for said county, personally appeared and , to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the and the of NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC. , and that the seal affixed to said instru- ment is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instru- ment was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and said and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF ) ss. On this day of , 1978 , before me, �.. a notary public within and for said county, personally appeared and , to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the and the of DUNN AND CURRY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, INC. , and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and said and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public -12- CES • ORDER NO. 8759 WILLIAM O. ,CHOELL CARLISLE MAO•ON SCHDELL MADSON, INC. REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR MINK.ND.71•i ENGINEERS 6. SURVEYORS MINN.NO. 4174 •0.DAK.75• 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH NO.OAK.771 NO.£-•176 HOPKINS. MINNESOTA S5343 wit'.NO. 11-474 /L0/1/0A HO.6271 PHONE 030-7601 IOWA NO.1y0s NO.OAK.•12i NO.OAK. 1104 MONT.NO. 1•1•-K MONT.NO. 1743. IOWA NO. 3s11 DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF CHANHASSEN FOR, CARVER BEACH AREA SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAINS Chaparral . ' Revised "That portion of the following easement which lies within plat of/ 2-13-76 42) A 30.00 foot temporary construction easement and a 14.00 foot perpetual easement for watermain purposes over, under and across the N 1/2, Sec. 12 following described property: Torrens Starting at a point in the centerline of Lakeview Drive which is Ct-. No. distant, in a Northwesterly direction, 484.113 feet from the inter- 7001 section of the centerlinesof said Lakeview Drive and Fern Road as it appears on the "Map of Carver Beach" at Long Lake, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County of Carver and State of Minnesota and running thence S. 75° 07' 0011 W. a distance of 3.240 feet to the point of intersection of tangents of a curve with a radius of 278.141 feet swinging Westerly and at the centerline of Dogwood Road of the aforesaid "Map of Carver Beach"; thence N. 65° 20' 00" U. along the tangent of the same curve a distance of 29.336 feet to a point in the sane said tangent; thence S. 24° 40' 00" W. a distance of 10 feet plus or minus , to a point on the Southerly side of said Dogwood Road which is the POINT OR PLACE OF BEGINNING; from thence, along the southerly side of Dogwood Road, the following courses and distances : Westerly, along a curve with a radius of 298.141 feet, a distance of approximately 75. feet to a concrete monument on ,the ground; thence N.. 65° 20' 00' W. 740.284 feet to a point of curve; thence along this curve which has a radius of 609.922 feet, a distance of 246.849 feet to a point of tangent; thence N. 88° 31 ' 20" W. a distance of 2387,239 feet to the centerline of Excelsior Road .as it appears on the "Map of Carver Beach"; thence S. 1° 07' 10" W. a distance of 180.01 feet to a point; thence S. 1° 50' 10" W. 420.005 feet to the most westerly point of this parcel as it is conveyed; thence S. 88° 31 ' 20" E. , 2,234.85 feet; thence S. 2° 34' 40" E. 406.02 feet; thence S. 88° 31 ' 20" E. 1254.73 feet; thence N. 1° 28' 40" E. along the Westerly side of a Right of Way, a distance of 370. feet plus or minus; thence and still along the westerly side of same said Right of Way, N. 22° 21 ' 40" W. a distance of 260. feet plus or minus, to the POINT OR PLACE OF BEGINNING. Excluding all that portion of Excelsior Road which runs Southwesterly along the West Boundary of this parcel as described. Excepting from the above property, the following described parcel : Starting at a point in the centerline of Lakeview Drive which is distant in a Northwesterly direction, 484.118 feet from the inter- section of the centerlines of said Lakeview Drive and Fern Road as it appears on the "Map of Carver Beach" at Long Lake, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County of (Continued) Page 1 of 3 . • ORDER NO. P-7 C1 WILLIAM P. bCHOCLL SCHOELL Se. MADSDN, INC. C AR LIi LC HADiON R[O1fT[RREGISTERED CIVIL CNDINCEp REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR MINN.ND. »�i ENGINEERS IS SURVEYORS `� i(7.OAK.71f MINN. NQ. 4374 SO NINTH AVENUE SOUTH WIS. NO.K•i 17• SO. OAK.711 HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 Weft.HD. 1-1174 f L.OS/DA NO.6771 PHONS D,s '1e- 01 IOWA NO.370$ NO,DAK.L]] M ONT,NO. I O14-( ND.OAK. 1 1DM IOWA NO. 11921 ®ESC■7ipTI®[.,r MONT.NO. 1y43.9 �o�/ Revised CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2-13-76 CARVER BEACH AREA SANITARY SEWER AND WATER;1AINS • 42) (Continued) N 1/2, Sec. 12 Carver and State of Minnesota, and running thence South 75° 07 ' 00" West a distance of 3.240 feet to the point of intersection Torrens of tangents of a curve with a radius of 278.141 feet swinging Ctf. No. westerly and at the centerline of Dogwood Road of the aforesaid 7001 "Map of Carver Beach" ; thence North 55° 20' 00" West along the tangent of the same curve a distance of 29.336 feet to a point in the same said tangent; thence South 24° 40' 00" West a distance of 10 feet, plus or minus, to a point on the Southerly side of said Dogwood Road, thence along the Southerly side of • Dogwood Road, the following courses and distance: . Westerly, aloe_ a curve with a radius of 298.141 feet, a distance of approximately 75 feet to a concrete monument on the ground; thence North 65° 20' • 00" West 740.284 feet to a point of curve; thence along this curve �.. which has a radius of 609.922 feet, a distance of 246.849 feet to a point of tangent; thence North 88° 31 ' 20" West a distance of 631 .913 feet to a point on the southerly line of said Dogwood Road where the same intersects with an extension of the East line of Highland Drive, as the same is shown on said Carver Beach Map, said point being the point of beginning of this description; thence running South at an angle of 93u 22' on an extension of said East line of said Highland Drive 170.34 feet to a point on said extension line; thence running East at an angle of 85° 38' parallel to the South line of said Dogwood Road, 145.41 feet to- a point; thence North at an angle of 90 , 170.05 feet to a point on the South line of said Dogwood Road, which said point is 135.41 feet from the point of beginning, thence West at an angle of 90°, 135.41 feet to the place of beginning. Said temporary easement being 30.00 feet to the right of the following described line and said perpetual easement being 14.00 feet to the right of the following described line. Beginning at the intersection of the northerly line of Dogwood Road as dedicated in Carver-Beach, according to the recorded plat thereof and the westerly line of Lakeview Drive (now known as Kiowa Avenue) as dedicated in said plat; thence on an assumed bearing of South 22 degrees 21 minutes 40 seconds East , along the southerly extension of the westerly line of said Lakeview Drive, to the southerly line of said Dogwood Road; thence continuing South 22 degrees 21 minutes 40 seconds East, along said southerly extension a distance of 250.00 feet; thence South 1 degree 28 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 296.67 feet and said line there terminating. ec�• ORDER NO. 8759 R/ILLI OCWILENJIN[[R SCHOELL �► MADSON, iNc. CARllil[ MADpON REOISTERED LAND SURVEYOR MINN.NO.33113 ENGINEERS s. SURVEYORS MINN.NO.4374 OD.OAK.7611 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH •O.OAK.7eI WIC.MO.t•�176 HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 WEIS.NO. 11-41.74 /LOI/IOA NO.�37I PHONE 030-7001 IOWA NO.37O) NO.OAK.1133 NO.OAK. 1101 MONT.NO. 1•%4-[ /OWA NO. 5933 DESCRIPTIONMONT.NO. 1743•3 ROMCITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER BEACH AREA SANITARY SEWER AND WATER."1AINS Revised 42) (Continued) 2-13-76 Together with a 30.00 foot temporary construction easement and a 14.00 N 1/2, Sec. 12 foot perpetual easement for watermain purposes over, under and across the above described property. The center line of both easements is Torrens described as follows: Ctf. No. 7001 Beginning at the terminus of the above described line; thence North 88 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 109.88 feet; thence South 1 degree 22 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 100.00 feet and said center line there terminating. Said temporary easements to expire December 31 , 1976. • • Page 3 of 3 . CITY CIF 4.7 _s[ • 4, CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth DATE: November 20, 1978 SUBJ: 1978 Temporary Improvement Bonds, Authorize Sale and Set Bid Opening Date Attached please find a copy of the synopsis of the proposed sale as prepared by Juran and Moody. Bob Sander will be present to discuss the proposed sale. Authorization to advertise for bids and to set December 11, 1978, as the bond sale date is recommended. ( 6.1 j i ; ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS • ,d5;, • ljye,'/��*.Y . 60J • Items Included Article from League of Cities Magazine. Letter to owners in Kowhnen' s Addition. Correspondence to and from Roger Drewing, The Press. Letter to Fire Dept. from Walter Wiedrick dated 11-6-78. Letter League of Cities dated 11-3-78 Letter to Suburban Engineering dated 11-6-78 Letter from Robert Voto dated 11-2-78 Letter to MnDOT dated November 8, 1978 Letter from Craig Mertz re: Kurvers vs. Chanhassen dated 11-9-78. Northern Cablevision Proposal dated Nov. 9, 1978. Letter from Bill Brezinsky dated 11-14-78 Memo from Mark Koegler dated 11-14-78 Letter to Craig Mertz from Bill Brezinsky dated 11-14-78. aYlVv v,..arr.w... .. ._....___ •'_.."r__.......__....w.._-..."..:�..+-��_vs� �.w. ... .. .. -_..,.as,.a...ay- _.......A a.=.. ,..i- J' ,- _. • \ �� `w �.'. .t of -.. " " "" am y�. � •; �-r-- ,e, 4- :3 Nv , _ r-' Ioplicationsof to : '�'` iT ` � , .and Plannin Act - i - - 1 hill 11101011111111 '.. r a k __.II '' I \AN :.,,••Y„ iFN. '. -,,ue - .�. -. {g P-- ..-. - q• - '�. .n- 'ems^ \ A\\ ....... a...- ----- - - }.a *.t '. fir, �.✓— - .... :�tr r. � .t ti .•.'g at E r+.--• -•-:r-.a3- • =k CHARLES E RIESENBER� ••<,.a '_-, ,A..; ;tom : Agricultural Planner c� r' s � • `�-S Sr ,, spa" t . i Preservatio ;,'L , " = � :r,lV,:: , ,.,,-'"-"•..,?.--..,.s-..,.:.„.-:4ti4-,e-::'F?'„'.4----,-.:,--..__:,,._,-,..-1',-;.:.-,..-..-:.-.„_--_x,--7.,.i.-._„=---.-.,1.s7-,..,._!i„,,-.4-m.:.,',....-:;-_-,•.V::."..e'.-4':-4._.-,.f.- ,;f;.4..,...:.:1,:',. I _ A t ••_ •f�- �,,'r-. „u- '.- Wit. . - ! •� _ _".-__ .__�_� .. -_ ^. ,,,r&-,t'-yw.+"u,' F> ...p 4 °? . .•.I.tom". The Metropolitan Land Planning Act(MLPA) is plan element and a successful preliminary review, changing local planning for Twin City area local public facility planning, capital improvement municipalities. Viewed as a national experiment, programming, and drafting of land use controls follow, urbanized, developing, and rural communities in the and by 1980 each municipality must meet a final area all face the obligation of fulfilling the deadline for the entire local planning program requirements of a state planning act unique to submittal. `r Minnesota. Along with pointing out existing and potential local implications of the Act, this article It is at the final regional review step that the Act 1 discusses local attitudes and offers guidance to authorizes the Metropolitan Council to modify local municipalities as they develop a planning program program direction in case of conflict with regional systems. The Act, furthermore, requires local plan Summary of the Act implementation through official controls and capital • Passed by the 1976 Minnesota Legislature, the MLPA improvement programming upon adoption, and requires local units of government to fulfill certain regional review of significant local plan amendments planning tasks. Most important, the Act gives thereafter. communities two to three years to upgrade local planning programs in the areas of land use, utility Local Reactions to the Act • siting, housing, parks, and capital improvement Local response to the MLPA is mixed. Not fully programming. Having to conform to statements which aware of the ultimate impact the MLPA will have on outline existing and programmed metropolitan systems local affairs, most communities have cooperated of sewers, parks, transportation, and airports, cautiously since receiving their system statement. • municipalities will develop local planning programs Nonetheless, three attitudes typify local feelings. spanning to the year 1990. First, some communities advocate the Act as an The first major task in the local planning process is opportunity to do a good planning job. They stress the the development of an overall local framework by need to coordinate local and regional plans in part preparing a preliminary land use plan. Once the land because of problems which transcend local -' use element is complete, each community will receive governmental boundaries. a preliminary Metropolitan Council plan review to iron out relationships with neighboring community plans Second, other communities oppose the MLPA, and regional systems. Upon completing the land use believing the main impetus for the Act comes from a s.-- regional desire to influence development practices in the urban fringe and rural areas. These communities Mr.Riesenberg is with the firm of Isberg•Riesenberg,Chelseth,and Associates, Inc. (Continued on page 6) , 4 MINNESOTA CITIES =.: T t a \\) \ si Ng Land Planning Act feel the Act is an implementation tool of metropolitan growth system for each metro area developing government and not a program necessarily designed to community, a concept only a handful of municipalities advance good local planning. maintain nationwide. Similarly, the issue of local communities addressing the policy of regional housing Still other communities patronize the MLPA by need is only currently being tested in liberal east coast fulfilling its statutory requirements, even though state supreme courts. By 1980, if the MLPA process is feeling the bill is not needed. These communities will successful, the typical metro area municipality in our key on getting their local program approved to insure state may be ahead of the entire nation in local continued regional facility financing and planning program status. programming, along with maintaining favorable le regional A-95 comment on federal and state grant Establishing New Programs in Rural Areas applications. Prior to the Land Planning Act, state planning enabling legislation guided local planning by allowing Local Implications Are Evident communities to undertake planning programs as Although describing the implications of the MLPA is desired, assuming certain guidelines were followed. only speculation at this time, since most communities Minnesota central cities and suburbs ordinarily took have just started their plan update or initiation the most advantage of planning under enabling program, it is worthwhile to spell out inferences gained legislation. Obviously, the MLPA goes beyond enabling `- to date, especially from programs well advanced in legislation, since now every metro area community their local planning process. In assisting a number of needs to plan. This leaves most rural communities and municipalities to advance local planning programs to townships, before not practicing planning anywhere the preliminary Metropolitan Council review stage, we close to fulfilling MLPA plan content guidelines, in the became aware of numerous local implications. situation of having to establish new planning Upgrading Local Planning Programs programs. Many observers feel rural areas need planning as much as urban areas; yet planning is new The actual content and scope of most local planning to most rural areas, and acceptance takes time. programs need expanding, upgrading, and greater sophistication. For example, no metro area developing community at the passage of the MLPA satisfied plan Additional Local Planning Expenditure content for timing and staging of development with Many communities' first introduction to the MLPA existing plans; few municipalities use capital resulted•in spending or budgeting local funds to fulfill improvement programming; still fewer local programs planning requirements. As stated already, few maintain consistency among their land use plans, municipalities can meet the content required in local facility plans, and implementation measures. Likewise, plans from the Metropolitan Council without at least even though most suburban communities participate undertaking a plan update program. A companion in one or more public assisted housing programs, most planning grant bill received approval in the 1976 community comprehensive plans do not meaningfully session, but local shares from the first million-dollar address housing policy implementation. allocation cover only a fraction of most local community program costs. For example, local Some of the expanded plan content goes beyond the allocations range from $79,000 for Minneapolis to- typical coverage of local planning programs. In fact, $1,600 for Jackson Township in Scott County. The two of the plan content elements—staging community greatest burden is on communities with little or no development through utility extensions and a low- past planning experience. �.. income housing policy implementation—are the forerunners in national planning controversy. The Although the first year funding scheme was staging element actually requires one local managed objective and based on established criteria, the second 6 MINNESOTA CITIES round of funding needs more emphasis placed on local To successfully fulfill MLPA requirements, need. planners and engineers need to work hand-in-hand, not independently. One professional cannot separately One aspect of the MLPA which many communities formulate a good utility staging and capital overlook is that of ongoing costs once the planning improvement programming scheme. In fact, depending projects are completed. Concern seems to focus on on the size of the community, a successful capital project costs initially incurred and ignores the notion improvement program not only requires planning and that planning is an ongoing, continuous process. In engineering input, but probably also calls for bonding practice, however, by expanding planning programs in and management expertise. most communities and even establishing new programs for many rural and urban fringe One added aspect of the MLPA which will communities, the costs of future implementation and increase the likelihood of professionals working administration of official controls may easily exceed together is that of overall program scheduling. Even initial project costs only years after adoption. professionals wanting to work more closely together in the past simply never found the opportunity to Traditional Local Planning Approach to Change comprehensively plan in a sequential manner—the Past land use planning approaches have traditionally developed a colored graphic of future land use plan first, public facility plans next, followed by the zoning ordinance and capital improvement land use designations showingthe end result of full g program. Too frequently the individual elements came community development. This graphic approach, at separate times. Often an old zoning ordinance was frequently accompanied with esoteric statements of used in utility design, or land use plans were updated goals and objectives, dealt little with how without zoning ordinance adjustment. To the contrary, development was to reach the perceived end result the MLPA calls for upgrading the entire comprehensive and offered little flexibility for change. Actually, the planning program in a two-or three-year period. more important community development aspects of utility construction, assessment policy, and urban Changing Role of the Planner r services are some of the prime ingredients in directing Involvement in facility planning will expand the and shaping community growth. Ironically, however, in customary land use planner role. Added technical providing urban services, traditional utility design expertise and working ability to understand and exercises seldom consider impact on future communicate with other municipal professionals is \.. development patterns. In carrying out the MLPA, needed. Equally significant, however, is that for the traditional approaches will change, for the local first time many planners will be accountable for their planning process should address the full gamut of work. The municipal professions of engineering, law, community development forces: land use, utility and management must daily face design parameters, timing and staging, housing policy implementation, professional registration, and even court tests. and capital improvement programming—all in a Planners know little of this. Change will come with the comprehensive framework. MLPA when review of a planner's work takes place according to deadlines and specific performance in Local Municipal Professionals terms of plan content. } Must Work More Closely Together Past planning practice normally proceeded like this: the planner works on the land use plan and drafts the Metro Influence on Local Plans zoning ordinance; the engineer develops a sewer plan; i The bill's controversy goes beyond requiring the attorney reviews the zoning ordinance; the certain local plan content. Most local officials feel its manager/administrator has little, if any, involvement. A real significance lies in the fact that the "Metropolitan typical situation found the planner telling the Council may require a local government unit to modify engineer, "Once I know where utilities and services are any comprehensive plan or part thereof which may to be expanded, I'll designate land uses." To the have a substantial impact on or contain a substantial contrary, the engineer would tell the planner, "Once I departure from metropolitan system plans." know what land uses are designated, I'll be able to design utility systems." These uncoordinated, Everybody seems anxious to see how the independent relationships have difficulty coming to Metropolitan Council will use and interpret its new grips with community development issues as a whole, powers. Just what is the interpretation of the passage and are likely to change abruptly. "substantial departure from system plans"? Is this in reference to obvious situations where a local sewer system is planned and metropolitan system support is lacking? Or does the interpretation broaden into November 1978 7 metropolitan modification of related concerns such as meet its obligation under the MLPA differently. zoning ordinances? Therefore, to start or update a good local planning 71 The extent to which the Metropolitan Council will program, several suggestions may be helpful. modify a local plan is still unknown, but the question • Make sure the local plan represents local policy. may be answered at the preliminary land use plan Obviously, follow metropolitan plan content review step. As a key step in the entire MLPA process, guidelines and incorporate existing and scheduled the preliminary review will take place prior to metropolitan facility formalizing the land use plan. Thereafter, the land use and inconsistencies surface when the localrmiti plane s 1 i plan is the framework for public facility planning, reviewed, justify, express, and document local ; capital improvement programming, and zoning. Aside policy as best known. Realize that inconsistency • from other mechanics, the first evaluation with regional policy or with neighboring communities will experience in fulfilling requirements communities is not necessarily bad; in fact, many of the MLPA is at the preliminary review. observers feel that the isolating of inconsistencies is ocess. A The preliminary evaluation is twofold. First, the all,try nott ostatro t out second-guessingct of the MLPA what the ove Metropolitan Council will review local plan concepts Metropolitan Council wants without first going in relation to regional plans and systems. Especially through an active local planning important to developing communities, the g P g Process. Metropolitan Council will evaluate local growth areas • Do not design a local planning program solely to for conformance to regional sewer systems and comply with state law or to become eligible for metropolitan urban service area boundaries, and � possibly for sufficient regulatory control measures in metropolitan facility construction projects by showing need for metropolitan systems. Such an rural service areas. Second, the work of the local approach in the long run is dysfunctional to local planner in addressing plan content will be judged. Is loan) policyplanning, causing the local plan to become justified by sound population and meaningless. A realistic framework based on local household forecasting?Are designated urbanizing needs to guide future community development areas supported by realistic planning concepts? Is the and/or redevelopment is valuable enough to stand rural land use regulatory system based on proven on its own merits. Besides, the Act requires that the techniques and legally tested ordinances? These and a local plan be implemented as it is consistent with L host of other plan content questions will be directed to official controls. Trying to implement an ill- the local planner. conceived plan is inadvisable. Another interesting aspect of the MLPA arising • Attempt to meet deadlines and make sure your from the preliminary step is flexibility in review per local planner is capable of ng the local plan. In other words, will identical development assistance necessary to develop lalcreditable issues be reviewed against standard guidelines?An excellent issue is that of how communities should program. Take time, also, to schedule a worthwhile program and acquire the resources necessary to regulate rural land use development. Will the Metropolitan Council say that in rural areas a 40-acre fulfill plan content and meet submittal dates.Commitment minimum lot size is called for, or will it saysessions is also that it is for planning commission work the community's responsibility to devise regulatory important. approaches, assuming options are available for rural • Assure that the local planner communicates with land use development control? and receives input from other municipal professionals in engineering, management, and law. Good local engineers and attorneys realize that it Conclusions takes a professional planner to offer the type of technical assistance necessary to complete the local Regardless of whether the community is St. Paul program. On the other hand, the planner should be or Brooklyn Park, is friend or foe of the Metropolitan equally aware of the invaluable assistance needed Council,or believes in local planning, each city will from the manager, lawyer, and engineer.■ i i • i i ` 8 L MINNESOTA CITIES i .. , .. C I TY O F .,., .„ ' 11 -2-. - '''' SSEN .„ .: `.. I ",,.L , .: l ; 4'" 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 3 (612) 474-8885 i I t } November 13, 1978 i i NOTICE i i On Monday, November 6, 1978 , the City Council of the City of Chanhassen acted to deny a request to rezone Mr. Bruce Cameron' s property of 6291 Blue Jay Circle from single family residential (R-1) to two family duplex (R-2) . The council did act to officially recognize this property as a non-conforming use under the present zoning ordinance. This means that the City recognizes that the property presently exists and may continue to exist as a duplex. However, should this use be discontinued for more than a 12 month period or should the structure be destroyed, that the only use of the property will be single family residential. N..' This notice is being sent to property owners in Koehnen' s Addition per the request of the City Council. /-1 4 _,-4 (///- (/ (1 -7-6-42 Don Ashworth, City Manager DA:k `.. 1 ; ...r.dy ►r. iaerson ;.1 "- • a nrs. (gene Tews r T-: 1 ' 1610 W. 63rd Street 6300 Cardinal Ave. L.__ ___ �_ i Excelsior, MN 55331 ! Excelsior, MN 55331 ' 1 ;+ 1 _.1Mr. Weddell Gravlun :':=•6270 Blue Jay Circle fd ;Excelsior, MN 55331 Excelsior, 1 Mr. & Mrs. W. Johnson Mr. & Mrs. Bruce Wirtz , ' E �,1660 West 63rd Street :-� 6251 Cardinal Ave. Excelsior, MN 55331 ! Excelsior, MN 55331 i { i -J `;Mr. Russell Stoddart , `:,�1611 West 63rd St. , '..Excelsior, MN 55331 { Carole A.I 1 Mr. & Mrs . Dean Solum Sayer • 1630 W. 63rd St. 16225 Cardinal Ave. `•= 1 1 Excelsior, MN 55331 ;� Excelsior, MN k --. - F7- E. - r.- --- t.s y! r, 5 5 3 31 �' �,---�•-•-: ,:------� fi 1 la ' ak < .. t•. May • •� d 7 I 1 Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Fransdal t Mr. V.C. Wirtz - :9j��. �, C-- 4 Y�� 1 1 6291 Ordinal Ave. 1 1620 Koehnen Circle a* '4 +;a. ft•-".-�' - •.+r :; -- I + Excelsior, NN 55331 ,, Excelsior, MN 55331 "4. � . , f i Mr. & Mrs. Perry Willson ter.. Melvin Anderson Y�. - . :F�..AV- !..- �`� .: `� :'tt' ;. • 1641 Koehnen Circle +i 1600 Koehnen Circle c s c�.t - Excelsior, MN 55331 Excelsior, MN 55331 �:r `•• �..:, . �': A `` � ,3 ,_ ! . .H- - -. 4 i • }-. i ti `e. :r • -3- +- Mr. Glen Doty •i 1690 Koehnen Circle • • ," .4. �� ` j Excelsior, 5 ' ' - asp ' s- -: ' II MN 5 3 31 N � ' • _ r ` s MaryRosati , +e...4, ;L .- 1711 E. Koehnen Circle ,y y =t _� Excelsior, MN 55331 �:= t` -z_ i :I•( - . •;,'.. = . ,• € `r�i Mr. Charles Osterfeld `� L" g2 :C. - i 1 1 6211 Cardinal Ave. I. ``-� . 1. E-•e• `s ` ! Excelsior, MN 55331 _ter f� r �` •�v �'• =r + _ s • .E ' ' K.: 41 •�� -.4. v •cam • t 11 _ -�i. i4'-.. -y.. x +1 c'' : • 4 • - ,! - CF IY O F -, : \ . ft :- Fil rm- u. , IA , _ 0 L - , •- ria FR ....... , nkla ,n09 ,9! 61 : �'` 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 � " ==' (612) 474-8885 • October 31, 1978 The Press Attn: Roger Drewing 1285 Park Street St. Paul, Mn. 55117 Dear Mr. Drewing: I apologize for my lateness in responding to your letter of September 8th, regarding the full color renderings of your development as well as adjoining developments . I was unable to place this as a discussion item on the September HRA agenda and we were forced to cancel the October meeting. We will be meeting on November 14th, 1978. I sincerely believe your offer to coordinate and prepare color renderings of the downtown area, the business park, and develop- ments on East Highway 5 will be beneficial to overall development of our community. This concept was a part of the HPA' s rationale in approving and printing of the redevelopment plan for the downtown area (copy attached) . The renderings you are proposing could be incorporated as a part of this plan, or be considered as a supplement to it. Another possibility, which I had hoped for, • would be to incorporate these renderings in a final redevelopment plan which would be more specific, i.e. instead of reflecting alternative downtown redevelopment possibilities , a final plan be prepared which would show the approved redevelopment plan for the downtown area ,p.nd how such would be integrated with our joining business/commerical/industrial areas. Should you desire to discuss any of the possibilities noted in this letter or to provide additional information to me prior to my presentation of this item to the Housing & Redevelopment Authority, please feel free to contact me. Sincerel r,, ---ty-,-' .D.V.,,, ,, ,,,, .., Don Ashworth City Manager DA:njo Enc. io. y the failess Inc, 01 fy-1 . (%_,-.4:_-_r 7.: `'' . El 1285 PARK STREET • ST. PAUL• MINNESOTA 55117 September 8, 1978 ,,\,O910(1?4isle , Mr. Donald Ashworth Cr) ,r. City Administrator SEP 1973 `. City of Chanhassen � CEII�'Ef, 7610 Laredo Drive ,- v1LLAGc e•t 1 Chanhassen, MN 55317 G.LI�N.;sScy, ,`' Dear Don: o> _ cc)/- , • We will be breaking ground in the next few weeks for our new building housing The Press, Inc. I have enclosed a plat that has been drawn up for us by Schoell & Madson showing the location of our new company and also the location of MTS and Lyman Lumber. Our firm is in the process of making full color renderings of this plat and we plan to print 4,000 to 5,000 in full color. We would be interested in doing this same thing in four parts. One of them would be your plans for the center of town. The second part would be for the other end of town including Dunn & Curry's Lake Susan Development. I am sending this plat to Mr. Roger Ulstad of the City of Eden Prairie and we would be willing to print a full color panel on their proposed property which adjoins Chanhassen. Don, my reason for writing you is that we would like to look over the color renderings that each of these firms have so that we could include them in our set of printed full color plats. We would be willing to donate this printing to the City of Chanhassen. Our estimated cost for this project would be approximately $7,000 to $10,000. • I am sending a copy of this letter to those people whom I think would be interested in this project (which would also be at no charge to them) . Any help you could be would be appreciated. Sincerely, • 46.,:C.&, B ,C1 ti��G Roger Drewing j President cc: Mr. Walter Hobbs, Mayor of Chanhassen Mr. Roger Ulstad, City of Eden Prairie RD:djl `. Mr. Herb Bloomberg, Bloomberg Companies Mr.Enclosure Tom Lowe, President, Lyman Lumber Mr. Bill _Ziemer, Lyman Lumber Mr. Ed Dunn, Dunn & Curry Mr. George Butzow, President, MTS zi.r.,,.....r.......,-1..,.........h.- .a..1....1.4.1 .::::.z 4.1....N.totRi6,53.1Z-1 -1,..afni.9;S: i cl:V3 1 4'15 ib% . •• • lii 1 • i I i i I 1 ' I ft j t I I I 10 a (5/3.7 i-:- i 1 I • I ...., 1i N . •'N\ .- . i icoe2a -L'''t t -:,. 1 .1 1 ,1 •t , . ! \ , 1 , . . . . . •. . . . . . I. . • . : , I ; v.; ..:.. 1 . : 1 i 11 I i • . - i ...., i . • ..,,, ; i ! I I ):. .... .! I . :' ! \q1 1 ; 1 . 1 . , j ..... ..: . .., i & I, 1 ! I . `4.• : - .- :..: ! ' ' [- , • ' I t . . N . ! . 1 e" ''..' ' , . ... 4 • I I •,,,,, • i .i. 4 ,.. ' ' , ,.._ . • , . , , . ..._..___ ... , , ,.... , . , ,. , . . ....e.• • . . ., „, .1 •, , : , ,. . . i .: ,): • . ..f . 1 1 ' I . .) 'i . i , , ( I 1-.1. \ 3 A .t . • [ . ...!.., , 1 , ; •• •••, i ' ,,1 ",... i .• Iill i z, (-),4 Y : 1 a I i I 4. I * 1 N i c,-, k . '" • .3 • , . 11 1 1 IA! Fiv • • . . , • i , 1 /.,- 1 . ( LUhiL i!!I November 3, 1978 ii league of minnesota cities ""j~'y� �� ,� r TO: All City Councilmembers and Managers, l:' 19;3 u'=� in care of the City Clerk r� R>~C IV ? X VILLAGE OF FROM: Donald Slater, Executive Director CHAN.LA SEN, I,/ SUBJECT: President Carter's Volunteer Wage Limitation Program After President Carter announced his program to combat inflation, local government officials have been concerned about the effect that it has on their policies . Many officials are not aware of what the consequences are if the city enters a labor set- tlement that calls for a pay increase in excess of the President' s suggested maxi- mum of 7%. The reason for the confusion is that neither the President nor anyone else has stated what the effect is. As a result of this uncertainty, several rumors have been spread which need to be addressed. One rumor is that if a city approves a wage increase that exceeds 7%, that the city will lose a portion of its Revenue Sharing Entitlement. This rumor is absolutely false. There is nothing in the revenue sharing statutes or regulations which would authorize such a penalty, and absent a statutory amendment there is nothing that the President can do to change this. To repeat, by entering into a wage settlement with an increase in salary in excess of 7%, a local governmental unit does not jeo- pardize its revenue sharing funds. Another rumor is that if a city fails to comply with the President' s program, that points will be deducted from applications for federal discretionary grants. As far as the League can determine, there is no truth to this either. There is no statute which allows any governmental agency to discriminate against any applicant based upon their compliance or non-compliance with the President's program. Furthermore, based on the information available to date, the League is of the opin- ion that no local governmental entity will be subject to any kind of penalty if it exceeds 7% in a labor settlement. Of course, the situation should be carefully fol - lowed to see if Congress makes any changes in the law. Since the President made no reference to any kind of penalty to any local governmental body which exceeds the limit, the League has concluded that no penalties will in fact develop, unless a law is implemented. The result of this situation leaves the decision of whether to comply or not to com- ply with the President's program within the sound discretion of each local govern- mental official . If you have any questions on this matter, feel free to contact the League. Our information is based on our own research and Washington contacts as well as that supplied by the National League of Cities. We have requested that NLC pursue a num- ber of questions concerning any future program affecting city government and we will publish any additional information we receive. 300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 C61 2J 222-2861 DS:glb 4 .. C I TY F ..• r, 4 il' .. .:, . li,s, : .,5::.: _ LEI 4•.- 7610 LAREDO DRIVEeP.O. BOX 147.CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 �-� z.�.T (612) 474-8885 November 6, 1978 G .4 w 1; r, Suburban Engineering Attn: Bruce Patterson 6875 Highway No. 65 NE Minneapolis, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Patterson: I am in receipt of your letter of October 30, 1978, regarding storm sewer plans for New Horizon Homes in the Carver Beach area. In regards to a city benefit or benefit to property owners of the 5. 5 acres north of Carver Beach Road, this office has the following concerns: 1) . The City of Chanhassen has completed it' s budgetary process for 1979 and certified such to the County. This budget does not include general obligation levies for storm sewer improvements - thus negating the possibility of shifting priorities. 2) . To date, all storm sewer improvements have been carried out through special assessment procedures against benefitting properties. It is possible that the City Council would consider initiating a public improvement project to complete the work noted in your letter (the other alternative of receiving a petition from property owners in the 5. 5 acres requesting the improvements does not appear logical) . However, you should note that any project initiated by the city council which would consider specially assessing benefitted property would require that the city follow all requirements of State law, i.e. ordering of feasibility study, ordering public hearing, finding of public necessity, authorizing plans and specifications, authorizing bids, completion of work by low bidder, notification of special assessment hearing, municipal bonding, and certification of assessments to County Auditor. Although this process has been the only Mr . Bruce Patterson -2- November 6, 1978 - reasonable option open to the City on previous storm sewer improvement projects , I sincerely question whether the time required for this type of process would present a valid option for you. In summation, I do not believe this issue can be simplified in this type of letter. Given the concerns of your office and New Horizon Homes, as well as those of the City, I would suggest a meeting between yourself, our engineers and myself. Sincerely, Don Ashworth City Manager DA:k cc: City Attorney, Russell Larson City Engineer, Schoell and Madson, Attn: Bill Brezinsky // /4/ DELAHUNT VOTO & CO., LTD. L" CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS WHITE BEAR LAKE. MINNESOTA 55110 \ow+ RONALD J DELAHUNT. CPA PHONE 426-3263 ROBERT J. VOTO. CPA P. O. BOX 8678 TIMOTHY E. REARDON. CPA PATRICK J. BARRETT. CPA // ROBE HT G TA UTG ES. CPA !t() /��• • r'Ep'� November 2, 1978 Ga✓.._s • �a� _- , [� G�L • Mr. Donald Ashworth, City Manager City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Don: Pursuant to the instructions of the R.C.C.M. - Finance Director, we have prepared the accompanying financial data for 1975, 1976 and 1977. This data was presented at the Finance Director' s meeting at Shoreview today and is to be reviewed for final acceptance on November 29, 1978. If you have any questions or comments on this data, please call me or present them for discussion on November 29, 1978. Very truly yours, DE LA HUNT VOTO & CO. , LTD. Robert J. Voto, CPA RJV/sh enc. cc: Correspondence File 23t�567 RECEIVED ` CNA ` „52, NhASSN� t M1NN. MEMBERS OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS CONSORTIUM OF RAMSEY COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31 , 1975, 1976 AND 1977 UNAUDITED - DECEMBER 31 , 1975 1976 1977 ASSETS Cash in Bank (Overdraft) $ (4,994.21) $ (3,025. 15) $ 2,874.42 Investments - At Cost 5,000.00 Accounts Receivable - Schedule 3,024.78 3,839.77 3,622.94 Other Receivables: Ramsey County - C.E.T.A. 1 ,969.43 987.91 1 ,002.41 City of White Bear Lake 726.97 786.82 Total Assets $ -0- $ 2,529.50 $ 13,286.59 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE LIABILITIES: Accounts Payable $ 560.44 $ 8,090.69 Salaries Payable 456.92 780.00 Payroll Taxes Payable 264.60 415. 19 Other Payables: City of White Bear Lake 2,753. 17 City of Maplewood 1 ,247.54 1 ,247.54 Total Liabilities $ -a- $ 2,529.50 $ 13,286.59 FUND BALANCE (Note ) -0- -0- -0- Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ -0- $ 2,529. 50 $ 13,286.59 (See Accompanying Disclaimer of Opinion) CONSORTIUM OF RAMSEY COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 , 1975 UNAUDITED DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT- GENERAL ACCOUNTING ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM TOTAL SOURCES OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES : FEDERAL GRANTS : 9,670.97 $ 9,670.97 Comprehensive Employement Training Act $ FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES: $ 143.71 1 ,331 .25 1 ,4/4.96 City of Maplewood 143.73 931 .24 1 ,074.97 City of White Bear Lake 143.73 231 .24 374.97 City of New Brighton 143.73 231 .24 374.97 City of Mounds View 143.73 231 .24 374.97 City of Shoreview 143.73 931 .24 1 ,074.97 City of Roseville 143•73 231 .24 374.97 City of North St. Paul Total Sources $ 1 ,006.09 $ 13,789.66 $ 14,795.75 USES OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES: Personnel Services: $ 10,008.00 $ 10,008.00 Salaries 1 , 135.91 1 , 135.91 P. E.R.A. and F. I .C.A. 545.75 545.75 Insurance Contractual Services: 224.00 2, 100.00 2,324.00 `., Control Data Corporation $ Other Costs: 46.91 46.91 Supplies 735. 18 735. 18 Travel , Training and Mileage Total Uses . t ,006.09 $ 13,789.66 $ 14,795.75 EXCESS OF FINANCIAL SOURCES OVER USES $ -0- Fund Balance - January 1 , 1975 Fund Balance - December 31 , 1975 (See Accompanying Disclaimer of Opinion) CONSORTIUM OF RAMSEY COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1976 UNAUDITED DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GENERAL ACCOUNTING UTILITY PAYROLL LABOR AND OTHER CHARGES ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM SYSTEM SYSTEM TOTAL BURDEN ACCOUNTING UTILITY TOTAL TOTAL OURCES OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES FEDERAL GRANTS: Comprehensive Employment Training Act $ 6,544.89 $1,510.36 $ 335.64 $ 8,390.89 $3,948.65 $3,948.65 $ 12,339.54 Intergovernmental Personnel Act _'9,618.00 9,618.00 -0- _ 9,618.00 FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES; City of Maplewood $ 117.97 1,034.38 170.16 31.46 1,236.00 $ 475.80 $ 347.20 823.00 2,176.97 City of White Bear Lake 117.96 1,034.39 170.15 31.47 1,236.01 1,314.26 1,305.31 360.84 2,980.41 4,334.38 City of New Brighton _117.96 1,034.39 170.15 31.47 1,236.01 444.25 101.25 563.21 1,108.71 2,462.68 City of Mounds View 117.96 1,034.39 170,15 31.47 1,236.01 92.56 43.14 135.70 1,489.67 City of Shoreview 117.96 132.04 170.15 31.47 -333.b6 -0- 451.62 City of Roseville 117.96 132.04 132.04 -0- 250.00 City of North St. Paul 117.96 132.04 132.04 -0- 250.00 Total Sources 825.73 $11,078.56 2 6a3 1.12 $10,110.98 $23,550.66 ��72. 1 8. 82.36 $1,314.39 $8,996.47 $ 33,,372.86 1SES OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES Personnel Services (Note ) $ 9,613.03 $2,218.39 $ 492.98 _ $12,324.40 $5,799.72 $5,799.72 $ 1$,124.12 Contractual Services: Ramsey County 1,465.53 142.73 1,603.26 $1,406.56 $1,314.39 2,720.95 4,329.21 DISCO -0- 475.8o 475.80 475.80 Control Data Corporation 9,618.00 9,618.00 -0- g,618.00 Other Costs: Supplies $ 44.85 -0, -0- 44.85 Travel, Training and Mileage 780.88 -0- 7-0-- 780.88 Total Uses $ 825.73 ,$11,078,56 $2,361,12 $10,110.28 $23,550.66 �799.72 $1,882.36 $1,314,19 $8,996.47 $ 33,372.86 =XCESS OF FINANCIAL SOURCES OVER USESO- $.�_0- -0- $ -0- Fund Balance - January 1, 1976 -0- Fund Balance - December 31, 1976 $ -O- (See Accompanying Disclaimer of Opinion) CONSORTIUM OF RAMS EY COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND 'FUND BALANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1977 UNAUDITED DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GENERAL ACCOUNTING UTILITY PAYROLL -LABOR AND OTHER CHARGES ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM SYSTEM SYSTEM TOTAL BURDEN ACCOUNTING UTILITY TOTAL TOTAL SOURCES OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES: FEDERAL GRANTS: Comprehensive Employment Training Act $1,443.47 $ 1,431.44 $2,658.39 $ 4,089.83 $ 6,495.61 $ 6,495.61 $ 12,028.91 Intergovernmental Personnel Act -0- $15,234.20 15,234.20 -0- 15,234.20 FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES: City of Maplewood 541.89 2,154.99 839.60 2,994.59 3,353.13 $2,393.03 $1,092.58 6,838.74 10,375.22 City of White Bear Lake 541.89 2,154.99 839.60 2,994.59 1,731.88 1,614.73 3,346.61 6,883.09 City of New Brighton 541.89 2,854.99 839.6o 3,694.59 2,038.25 53.87 2,224.41 4,316.53 8,553.01 City of Mounds.View 541.89 2,854.99 839.60 3,694.59 497.87 646.70 1,144.57 5,381.05 City of Shoreview 541.89 839.59 839,59 -0- 1,381.48 City of Chanhassen 541.89 2,854.99 839.60 3,694.55 889.34 981.77 - 1,871.11 6,107.59 Ramsey County 500.00 -0- -0- 500.00 Total Sources $5,194.81 $14, 306. 39 $7,695. 98 $15,234.20 $37 , 236. 57 $15 . oo6. o8 $5,043.4o $3.963.69 $24, 013.17 $ 66 , 444. 55 USES OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES: Personnel Services (Note ) $3,334.69 $ 3,306.90 _$6,141.38 $ 9,448.28 $15,006.08 $15,006.08 $ 27,789.05 .Contractual Services; Ramsey County . -0- 871.49 1,554.60 2,426.09 $5,043.40 $3,963.69 9,007.09 11,433.18 Control Data Corporat.ion -0- 10,128.00 $15,234.20 25,362.20 -0- 2 5,3b2.20 Other Costs: ` Supplies 627.59 -0- `-0- 627.59 Printing and Publishing 541.93 -0- -0- 541.93 Travel, Training and Mileage 659.22 -0- -0- 659.22 Telephone 31.38 _0_ _o- 31 .38 Total Uses 5,194.81 $14, 03 6,39 $$7,695.98 $15,234.20 $37,236.57 115,006,08 $5,,o43.40 $,3.963.69 $24,013.17 $ 66,444.55 EXCESS OF FINANCIAL SOURCES OVER USES $ -0- $ -0- $ _0_ $ _0_ Fund Balance - January 1, 1977 -0- Fund Balance - December 31, 1977-0- (See Accompanying Disclaimer of Opinion) .i CONSORTIUM OF RAMSEY COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES ' DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS - DECEMBER 31 , 1977 UNAUDITED i ACCOUNTING UTILITY PAYROLL TOTAL SUMMARY OF COSTS : Personnel Services $ 24,609.59 $ 8,359.77 $ 492.98 $ 33,462.34 Contractual Services: Ramsey County 2,337.02 1 ,697.33 4,034.35 Control Data Corporation 12,228.00 24,852.20 37,080.20 Total Costs S 39, 174.61 S 10,057. 10 $ 25,345. 18 S 74,576.89 SUMMARY OF FINANCING: FEDERAL GRANTS: Comprehensive Employment Training Act $ 17,647.30 $ 4, 168.75 $ 335.64 $ 22, 151 .69 Intergovernmental Personnel Act 24,852.20 24,852.20 FEES: City of Maplewood $ 4,520.62 1 ,009.76 31 .46 5,561 .84 City of White Bear Lake 4, 120.62 1 ,009.75 31 .47 5,161 .84 City of New Brighton 4, 120.62 1 ,009.75 31 .47 5, 161 .84 City of Mounds View 4,120.62 1 ,009.75 31 .47 5, 161 .84 City of Shoreview 363.28 1 ,009.74 31 .47 1 ,404.49 City of Chanhassen 2,854.99 839.60 3,694.59 City of Roseville 1 ,063.28 1 ,063.28 City of North St. Paul 363.28 363.28 Total Financing S 39, 174.61 $ 10,057. 10 S 25,345. 18 $ 74 576.89 (See Accompanying Disclaimer of Opinion) ',LP Lt1 tv M al �0 M Ltl M al N N Ol O Lh O al t7 al 01 r- M Ul M N CO al co N CD N 01 N J N CO 4- in �- In N. � Cl in 00 O I- � ul N N N Q 'o N •-- - .it - N C-CO - ♦0 '-Ltl N- 111 V0 O t+1..0 .- - N _ .C- a U M F- _ t/Y to tr)- t!T t/T v)- t/)- tn- Z 01 al0 '.0 �• -it N Ltl CO M LU M N .o CO trl t0 ‘0 Ni N CO N O 4- in M CD � 4- O N al N1 in_ N. 00 I -CO M 4- - N v `i - Q 2 {/) t1)- • Vr V. tn- U i.-.. — .. . '0 NCO - - Ul N NUN al O 00 O 3 O1\0 O C) 00 '0• co CDN in • - N• hO N N Ole al NI N in M v M - I 0 ^ CO OWC I v - I O M M v 5- Z t/) N tn- t/N th tn- tn- t/> �•-� r F. F. .."--. F. F— i0 O `0 - al U1 t- 10 M al al ill M 00 in 01N - O MCO--1" Ln Ln 00 tllN - 0 ul C) 3 it) n N -it al- N '.0 '0 01 N A.0 a1 N 4J N \O00 M OM�M 01 0- u\^ N N -LLI CD ] ..--• .. .. .. v ^ I- .� � ....... J yj. 41), 4.116- tn- N N t? Q _ . . d K1 0 M •�• 01 Lfl F` UN - - al' Cl al in O LA (7 O - N1 U ZO '.0 NI Co O M CO 4- N - M CDOO Ln N CO-- c) I- '.0 -N I- O Ln Lt\ N 4- 01-- al CO Lfl O '0 ON '.0 -- O 111 u1 O,1 OLu 3S '.0 '.0N M MNM %0 t- - in -1' 01 inM ') '.0 J n LU O - - t0 • • O "— N f- •- (- U) c) CO N. Z _ - ^ .. •• •-� . >- Q al CC .-- - v _ F- - Co r vy tn• to tn- to tn- Z -- o ti W ••LU O t, F- • F._ ^ ^ U W M - N al - � Ol Lf1 t\ � N. O 01 QI l\ N O n L` cc OW OD 01 CO C, M OD� N- 0 Kl CO ul N � O O Ih O W V) W Q W Q al 0 C) N � al-- Ltl t`Il '0 01 CO O N CD to F- coZ I- .-J Lc% ul - M (-el N M M LA N 4' in C) '0 Ln�' N Z i •-• N f- _ O .� v t0 N- ..._.... c) -it N Q ) W 2 CCN U W W LL. U 0 CO N to tn• tl} t/) tJ) O Q _ F._ -. LIl O Lf1 M CO � � C) OM al in M O N L O O tl O C) al 0l co c) M CD�' ) in N N.'0 01 c) N. n I- O t0 M O N .� C1 O '0 '0 01 N CT N O M 01 CO a 3 N al N M O v M uCP l 0) L�n LA -it ul tD Ltl O Ci! O CO al v v N v v csJ M 0) J C) tn- 1? t/r trr to trr N- n al Q) C) .. 4-' Q) a) N 4J - in C m a) C M Li) L. 0 0 L E L F-- ,• 0 a1 .-' 0 .0 t0 t-' 0 0 O N. > U ..0 j > U U 7 C E co n N- •- 4-' (0 L' •� 0 0 W - al {- (a 7 c E U -o concL i-' O E C C N Q ♦-' 0 < - L i-' E -, C C Q +t 0 E 4-' 0 0 7 0 O J -- -^ a < Ea..0 E E O 'o •• '.0 in < CL v' E •- '0 •• 0 t� 7 (+l L ^ •- O >- G) 0 L • 4, 0 atN. •- 0 >. O 4-' I._ LT U) O0-, 0 N. ___. cc a) L c O - cn a-' +' (0 7 0 C 01 C O -- N 4-' MI 7 C 0 C C 01 •0 Q CC -0 0 •• •- 4-$ Q) in Ln L CO 0)•- - •• - 1-) Q) to L_ Co •- a)•- (0 - < Lu w w E ,.C) '.0 E > Dl T >- Q) L +-' >. N. E > 0) >. C) 4-1 >- L_ 4-' .- _J Co co U E - n-0 r. 0 C in V) ❑."D (0 C 4-' N-'o � 0 c V) Q.•o C 4-' (0 C - —-- co 4-' Q) (0 al < C.O •- 0 C .0 7 •- CO 01 < Cl O •- O c 7 •- .c 7 0 (13 0 Q UJ W 0_ U 4.) - a-' >. (a C) 0 4--' 4-' >- (0 0 U 0 U 4-' 4-' I- (-) Q) (1) 0 4-1 .0 4' C +' - 4-' 0 •- 0 4' -C -I-' C 4-' 4-' U •- 0 w 0 0 - W N C) Uf F- ( N N 0 7 •- 0 0 L L 0 4-' F- I N U) V) 7 •- to '- U 4-' L U F- f- w 2 O 4-' 7 L. 7 0 -- L 7 0 0 0 7 L ) 0 - 7 0 Q 0 Q (_> I I C to •-) 0 •-i U •- >-•-1•n -C to •--i 0 •-. U •- •- 1-0 .0 w I- 0 I- 0 .O "0 L) 4-' (a -0 (0 4-' • • F- -C) •0 U 4-' •0 0 • • 4.' tY >- Q >. L- E zQ E < < 0.. < JO (a .n LU NE QQOQJ (a _00 m _ N co L 0 +-' w 0 • O % 0 0 • • 0 • • I- O - 7 O 7 I- F- I- -- N M F- - N F- F-.-•F- - N I- N Z W 0 N Q C •--) to O J z --) O < -", Q Co U •) Q m t) U - C) CI U CO Q Q Q CONSORTIUM OF RAMSEY COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES BILLING ADJUSTMENTS - CITY OF MAPLEW00D 1976 AND 1977 UNAUDITED REVISED ORIGINAL BILLINGS BILLINGS ADJUSTMENT 1976 ADJUSTMENTS: A. General Administrative (Total Costs $825.73 = 7 Cities) $ 117.97 $ 250.00 $ (132.03) B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System 1 ,034.38 ----- 1,034.38 2. Utility System 170. 16 200.00 (29.84) 3. Payroll System 31 .46 31 .46 C. Operations: 1 . Labor and Burden (Schedule Attached) ------ 1 ,500.00 (1 ,500.00) 2. Other Charges: a. Accounting 475.80 475.80 b. Utility 347.20 347.20 — Total 1976 Adjustments S 2. 176.97 S 2,773.00 $ (596.03) 1977 ADJUSTMENTS : A. General Administrative (Total Costs $5, 194.81 : C.E.T.A. $1 ,443.47 - Ramsey County $500.00 = $3,251 .34 - 6 Cities) $ 541 .89 $ 500.00 $ 41 .89 B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System: - - a. Base Charge ----r ----- b. Balance 2,154.99 2,311 .58 (156.59: 2. Utility System 839.60 2,548.85 (1 ,709.25: C. Operations: 1 . Labor and Burden (Schedule Attached) : a. Accounting 2,012.73 1 ,800.00 212.73 b. Utility 1 ,340.40 1 ,800.00 (459.60 2. Other Charges: 42 a. Accounting 2,393.03 2,435.93 (42.90 b. Utility 1 ,092.58 1 ,092.58 --- c. Miscellaneous ---- 250.00 (250.00 Total 1977 Adjustments S 10,375.22 $ 12,738.94 $ (2,363.72 Total Adjustments S (2.959.75 • CONSORTIUM OF RAMSEY COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES BILLING ADJUSTMENTS — CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE 1976 AND 1977 UNAUDITED REVISED ORIGINAL BILLINGS BILLINGS ADJUSTMENT 1976 ADJUSTMENTS : A. General Administrative (Total Costs $825.73 4 7 Cities) $ 117.96 $ 250.00 $ (132.04) B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System 1 ,034.39 ----- 1 ,034.39 2. Utility System 170. 15 200.00 i (29.85) 3. Payroll System 31 .47 ---- _ 31 .47 C. Operations: 1 . Labor and Burden (Schedule Attached) 1 ,314.26 1 ,650.00 (335.74) 2. Other Charges: a. Accounting 1 ,305.31 1 ,252.24 53.07 b. Utility 360.84 360.84 _ ------- Total 1976 Adjustments S 4.334.38 S 3,713.08 $ 621 .30 1977 ADJUSTMENTS: A. General Administrative (Total Costs $5, 194.81 — C.E.T.A. $1 ,443.47 — Ramsey County $500.00 = $3,251 .34 6 Cities) $ 541 .89 $ 500.00 $ 41 .89 B. Development (Schedule Attached) : . 1 . Accounting System: a. Base Charge __ —___.._ ------ b. Balance 2, 154.99 2,311 .58 (156.59) 2. Utility System 839.60 2,548.85 (1 ,709.25) C. Operations: 1 . Labor and Burden (Schedule Attached) : a. Accounting 1 ,731 .88 1 ,800.00 (68. 12) b. Utility ------ -------- ______ 2. Other Charges: a. Accounting 1 ,614.73 1 ,614.73 ------ b. Utility ----- ______ c. Miscellaneous ----- 150.00 (150.00: Total 1977 Adjustments S 6.883.09 $ 8,925. 16 $ (2,042.07: Total Adjustments S (1 .420.77: v vlJ VI\1 1 J 1 VI 1\I'll IJ L I vS '- ' I I i I 'I I V 1 1 T L.. 11 1 LJ • BILLING ADJUSTMENTS - CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON 1976 AND 1977 UNAUDITED REVISED ORIGINAL BILLINGS BILLINGS ADJUSTMENT 1976 ADJUSTMENTS: A. General Administrative (Total Costs $825.73 : 7 Cities) $ 117.96 $ 250.00 $ (132.04) B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System 1,034.39 ------- 1,034.39 2. Utility System 170. 15 200.00 (29.85) 3. Payroll System 31 .47 ------ 31 .47 C. Operations: 1 . Labor and Burden (Schedule Attached) 444.25 175.00 269.25 2. Other Charges: a. Accounting 101 .25 109.69 (8.44) b. Utility 563.21 557.90 5.31 Total 1976 Adjustments S 2.462.68 S 1 .292.59 $ 1 , 170.09 1977 ADJUSTMENTS: A. General Administrative (Total Costs $5, 194.81 - C.E.T.A. $1 ,443.47 - Ramsey County $500.00 = $3,251 .34 6 Cities) $ 541 .89 $ 500.00 $ 41 .89 B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System: a. Base Charge 700.00 700.00 ---- b. Balance 2, 154.99 2,311 .58 (156.59) 2. Utility System 839.60 .2,548.85 (1 ,709.25) C. Operations: 1 . Labor and Burden (Schedule Attached) : a. Accounting ---- --- b. Utility 2,038.25 1 ,800.00 238.25 2. Other Charges: a. Accounting 53.87 53.87 ---- b, Utility 2,224.41 2,224.41 ------ c. Miscellaneous ------ 150.00 (150.00) Total 1977 Adjustments S 8.553.01 $ 10.288.71 $ (1 ,735.70) Total Adjustments S (565.61) • ISILLI1Vb MUJUJIMkNIS - LIlY Ut MUUNDS VIEW 1976 AND 1977 UNAUDITED REVISED ORIGINAL BILLINGS BILLINGS ADJUSTMENT 1976 ADJUSTMENTS : A. General Administrative (Total Costs $825.73 = 7 Cities) $ 117.96 $ 250.00 $ (132.04) B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System 1 ,034.39 ------- 1,034.39 2. Utility System 170. 15 200.00 (29.85) 3. Payroll System 31.47 ------ 31 .47 C. Operations: 1 . Labor and Burden (Schedule Attached) 92.56 ------ 92.56 2. Other Charges: a. Accounting ------ -----_ b. Utility 43. 14 43. 14 ----- Total 1976 Adjustments $ 1 ,489.67 S 493. 14 $ 996.53 1977 ADJUSTMENTS: A. General Administrative (Total Costs $5, 194.81 - C. E.T.A. $1 ,443.47 - Ramsey County $500.00 = $3,251 .34 6 Cities) $ 541 .89 $ 500.00 $ 41 .89 B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System: a. Base Charge 700.00 7 00.0 0 ------- b. Balance 2, 154.99 2,311 .58 (156.59) 2. Utility System 839.60 2,548.85 (1 ,709.25) C. Operations: 1 . Labor and Burden (Schedule Attached) : a. Accounting ------ b. Utility 497.87 900.00 (402. 13) 2. Other Charges: a. Accounting ----- ----- b. Utility 646.7o 646.7o ------ c. Miscellaneous ----- ----- ----- Total 1977 Adjustments $ 5,381 .05 S 7,607. 13 $ (2,226.08) Total Adjustments $ (1 ,229.55) . CONSORTIUM OF RAMS- Y Lv, • BILLING ADJUSTMENTS — CITY OF SHO EVIE 44 1976 AND 1977 UNAUDITED REVISED ORIGINAL BILLINGS BILLINGS ADJUSTMENT 1976 ADJUSTMENTS: A. General Administrative (Total Costs $825.73 = 7 Cities) $ 117.96 $ 250.00 $ (132.04) B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System 132.04 —_---_ 132.04 2. Utility System 170. 15 200.00 (29.85) 3. Payroll System 31 .47 31 .47 Total 1976 Adjustments 5 451 .62 S 450.00 $ 1 .62 1977 ADJUSTMENTS: A. General Administrative (Total Costs $5, 194.81 — C.E.T.A. $1 ,443.47 — Ramsey County $500.00 = $3,251 .34 6 Cities) $ 541 .89 $ 500.00 $ 41 .89 B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System: a. Base Charge -- ------ _�_� b. Balance -- 2. Utility 839.59 2,650.68 (1 ,811 .09) Total 1977 Adjustments 5 1 .381 .48 S 3. 150.68 $ (1 ,769.20) Total Adjustments 5 (1 .767.58) Y CONSORTIUM OF RAMSEY COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES BILLING ADJUSTMENTS — CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1977 UNAUDITED REVISED ORIGINAL BILLINGS BILLINGS ADJUSTMENT 1977 ADJUSTMENTS: A. General Administrative (Total Costs $5, 194.81 — C.E.T.A. $1 ,443.47 — Ramsey County $500.00 = $3,251 .34 6 Cities) $ 541 .89 $ 500.00 $ 41 .89 B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System: a. Base Charge 700.00 700.00 ----- b. Balance 2, 154.99 2,311 .58 (156.59) 2. Utility System 839.60 ------ 839.60 . C. Operations: 1 . Labor and Burden (Schedule Attached) : a. Accounting 889.34 1 ,200.00 (310.66) b. Utility w-- ---'� 2. Other Charges: a. Accounting 981 .77 981 .77 ------ b. Utility -- --- c. Miscellaneous ---- ---~— `--"-- Total 1977 Adjustments S 6,107.59 S 5,693.35 $ 414.24 Total Adjustments S 414.24 CONSORTIUM OF RAMSEY COUNTY MUNICINALititS BILLING ADJUSTMENTS - CITY OF ROSEVILLE 1976 UNAUDITED REVISED ORIGINAL BILLINGS BILLINGS ADJUSTMENT 1976 ADJUSTMENTS: A. General Administrative (Total Costs $825.73 : 7 Cities) $ 117.96 $ 250.00 $ (132.04) B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System 132.04 `"`-- 132.04 2. Utility System 3. Payroll System `--- Total 1976 Adjustments $ 250.00 $ 250.00 S -0- Total Adjustments S -Cr- CONSORTIUM OF RAMSEY COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES BILLING ADJUSTMENTS - CITY OF NORTH ST. PAUL 1976 UNAUDITED REVISED ORIGINAL BILLINGS BILLINGS ADJUSTMENT 1976 ADJUSTMENTS: A. General Administrative (Total Costs $825.73 7 Cities) $ 117.96 $ 250.00 $ (132.04 B. Development (Schedule Attached) : 1 . Accounting System 132.04 ------ 132.04 2. Utility System 3. Payroll System -`--- Total 1976 Adjustments $ 250.00 S 250.00 $ -0- Total Adjustments $ -Cf- BILLING ADJUSTMENTS - DEVELOPMENT COSTS 1976 AND 1977 UNAUDITED ACCOUNTING UTILITY PAYROLL SYSTEM SYSTEM SYSTEM TOTAL 1976 ADJUSTMENTS: Total Development Costs $ 11 ,078.56 $ 2,361 . 12 $ 10,110.98 $ 23,550.66 C.E.T.A. Grants (6,544.89) (1 ,510.36) (335.64) (8,390.89) I.P.A. Grant -0- -0- (9,618.00) (9,618.00) Excess Membership Fees for Shoreview, Roseville and North St. Paul (396.12) -0- -0- (396. 12) Development Costs Chargeable to Cities $ 4, 137.55 $ 850.76 $ 157.34 S 5.145.65 Cities Participating 4 = 5 : 5 Cost Per City S 1 .034.39 S 170. 15 S 31 .47 1977 ADJUSTMENTS: Total Development Costs $ 14,306.39 $ 7,695.98 $ 15,234.20 $ 37,236.57 C.E.T.A. Grants (1 ,431 .44) (2,658.39) (4,089.83) I .P.A. Grant (15,234.20) (15,234.20) Development Costs Chargeable to Cities $ 12,874.95 $ 5,037.59 S -0- $ 17.912.54 Special "Base Charges" for New Brighton, Mounds View and Chanhassen (2, 100.00) -0- Balance Pro-Rated $ 10,774.95 $ 5,037.59 Cities Participating : 5 i 6 Cost Per City $ 2. 154.99 $ 839.60 BILLING vADJUSTMENTS -OPERATING LABOR AND BURDEN 1976 AND 1977 UNAUDITED 1977 ACCOUNTING UTILITY 1976 55% 45% TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS: , Salaries - Tim $ 15,695.00 $ 16,028.00 Salaries - Jim -0- - 7,715.43 F. t.C.A. and P.E.R.A. 1 ,703.58 2,658.22 Insurance 725.54 1 ,387.40 Totals $ 18, 124. 12 $ 27,789.05 CREDITS AND ADJUSTMENTS: C.E.T.A. Grants $ 3,948.65 $ 6,495.61 Allocated to Other Programs: Administration 0%/12% -0- 3,334.69 Development 687)34% 12,324.40 9,448.28 Totals $ 16,273.05 $ 19,278.58 NET PERSONNEL COSTS ALLOCATED TO OPERATIONS $ 1 .851 .07 S 4,680.76 $ 3,829.71 $ 8,510.47 ALLOCATION TO CITIES: Maplewood 0/°/43%135% $ -0- $ 2,012.73 $ 1 ,340.40 $ 3,353. 13 White Bear Lake 71%/37/J 0% 1 ,314.26 1 ,731 .88 -0- 1 ,731 .88 New Brighton 24%/1%/52% 4114.25 46.81 1 ,991.44 2,038.25 Mounds View 5%/0%/13% 92.56 -0- 497.87 497.87 Chanhassen 0%/19%/0% -0-- 889.34 -0- 889.34 Totals $ 1 ,851 .07 S 4,680.76 S 3,829.71 S 8,510.47 --w Finance Directors Meeting RCCM 11-2-78 In attendance were: Dan Faust, Maplewood Pete Sausen, White Bear Lake Don Brager, Moundsview John Remkus, Shoreview Rand Winspear, North St. Paul Don Scholund, Roseville Jim Thoren, RCCM Jim Thoren provided a handout of the RCCM work program for both the accounting and utility modules. Faust and Sausen pointed out that the information provided on the accounting system was inadequate. Faust spoke on the order of accounting priorities and the investment program. Thoren was directed to have Chaffee prepare a report and submit it to all members within a week. The report is to be prepared in the previously requested format. • Thoren discussed the utility proqrath and its development since the August 30 meeting. The month of November will be spent improving the system -For New Brighton and White 'Bear Lake. The next City could begin to go on in December. Chanhassen will be contacted by Thoren regarding being the next City. Sausen spoke regarding the payroll system. . The Ramsey County payroll system will be available about February 1 , 1979. At that time the RCCM will have the choice of two alternatives. First, the RCCM could become a department of the County. All Cities would be standardized and would follow all the County procedures. The second alternative would be for the RCCM to take the Ramsey County program and use the IPA grant to modify it as the needs of the Cities would dictate. Bob Voto of De La Hunt Voto and Company spoke regarding the accounting for past costs. Voto presented two handouts on the costs and payments of RCCM activity between 1975 and1977. A statement of accounts receivable was included for each City and the possible adjustments for each City. Additional discussion was held regarding the development costs and the possible costs for new Cities to buy into the RCCM. All Finance Directors were to take the Voto report for study and additional discussion at the next meeting. Faust discussed the possiblity of preparing the trial balance sheet 05 6i ,- 8 9-N for the Consortium Cities by computer. 4 Nov/978 Recent-Et) SAG£O� CHANHAss C9, MINN.12'4,72- • T Sausen. discussed the possibility of receiving an IISAC grant. The first determination for the Finance Directors will be the determination of the top priorities. Each Finance Directors will return at the next meeting with the priority items for his City. The next meeting will be Wednesday, November 29, 1978 at 1 :30 in Shoreview. Peter G. Sausen, • • tE f' WILLIAM D.SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSDN JACK T.VOSLER JAMES R.ORR 1AROLD E.OAHLIN s_:.»; - LARRY L.HANSON : SCHOELL MADSON, INC. RAYMOND J. MCKSON € '1 WILLIAM J.BREZINSKY s_: ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS JACK E.GILL RODNEY B. GORDON Lis` -; THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND (612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E.ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON. SOUTH OAKOTA AND DENTON• TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING November 8, 1978 Minnesota Department of Transportation f't011i73 �J 9 ~15 Transportation Building RECEIVED �°= St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Lo ( VILLAGE OF � C�-lA1�thTggg� �i�:� Subject: Mn/DOT/PLAN �. MtNt�F. �- Gentlemen: Oc' J?9L We have reviewed the subject plan, particularly as it pertains to the City of Chanhassen, Carver County,which we serve as City Engineers. Comments contained herein are authorized by Mr. Donald Ashworth, City Manager. We believe the projects affecting the area of the City of Chanhassen repre- • sent the minimum scope of state highway improvements which would provide satisfac- tory transportation to the City. These projects are enumerated as follows: A. Implementation: Projects which are funded and will be constructed during Fiscal 1979-81. 1979 1. Highway 5: Bikeway from County Road 17 to Lake Ann Park (p.B-97). 2. Highways 169-212: Turn and bypass lanes, signals, channelization and lighting at Shakopee "Y". (p. B-102). 3. Highway 5: Signal installation at Dakota Avenue (p. B-102). B. Project Development: High priority projects in development stage (design, securing approvals, right-of-way acquisition, etc.) 1982-83 1. Highways 169-212: Construct first stage of Expressway from Norwood to Interstate 494 (p. B-106). • 1984-85 1. Highways 169-212: Construct second stage of Expressway, Norwood to 494 (p. B-107). 2. Highway 41: Construct new highway from Southwest of Shakopee to Pro- posed 212 (p. B-107). 3. Highway 101: Replace bridges carrying C & NW Ry. and crossing Bluff Creek (p. B-107 and -108). i s > SCHOELL & MAOSON.tNc. - 1 Minnesota Department of Transportation Page 2 November 8, 1978 C. Study Program: Lead Time Beyond Six-Year Period. 1. Construction of Highway 41 from Highway 7 to Proposed 212 (p. B-112). As a general comment, the report appears complete and comprehensive and, if adopted, should serve well as a guide to transportation improvement for the next few years. A suggestion: location of various projects would be much clearer if a metropolitan area (Apparently Region 11) map were included to indicate the exact location of proposed projects therein, as was done with other regions. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. (Consulting Engineers for City of Chanhassen) WDSchoell; \A 4°4 ‘ —' cc: Mr. Danald Ashworth LARSON & MERTZ P ATTORNEYS AT LAW �� 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RUSSELL H.LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE CRAIG M. MERTZ (612) 335-9665 November 9, 1978 OF COUNSEL HARVEY E.SKAAR MARK C.McCULLOUGH Donald W. Ashworth Chanhassen City Manager Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Kurvers v. Chanhassen Dear Don: Enclosed is a copy of the dismissal with prejudice and judgment for costs which were entered against Mr. and Mrs. Franklin J. Kurvers in connection with their Frontier Development Park assessment appeal. The $515. 00 judgment will constitute a lien on any abstracts for real estate owned by Mr. and Mrs . Kurvers within Carver County. That lien will expire on September 21, 1988 . If the Kurvers attempt to sell any abstract real estate located in the county, they will not be able to pass marketable title to the purchaser until this judgment lien has been satisfied. This office will be taking no active measures to collect on this judgment. If you wish this office to commence such active measures as garnishment or attachment, please advise the undersigned. Very truly yours, CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen City Attorney CMM:mep Encl . C . NORTHERN CABLEVISION, INC. CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY PROPOSAL TO THE MINNESOTA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS BOARD NOVEMBER 9, 1978 ' F ■ I 1 .4 i t 1 I I NORTHERN CABLEVISION, INC. November 9, 1978 Mrs. Gertrude Ulrich, Chairperson Minnesota Cable Communications Board 500 Rice Street ' St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 Dear Chairperson Ulrich: Enclosed please find a proposal by Northern Cablevision, Inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary of Storer Broadcasting Company, to create a Cable Service Territory in the southwest suburbs of Hennepin County, consisting of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins , Minnetonka, Richfield and St. Louis Park. As required by statute and rule, this proposal is also being submitted to the Metropolitan Council and the City Managers of the seven included municipalities and twelve adjacent municipalities. Notice of this proposal was provided by letter dated September 28, 1978 to all City Managers of the included and adjacent municipalities. Notice was also published in the local newspapers of all included and adjacent municipalities during the week of September 29, 1978 through October 5, 1978. The thirty day notice requirement of MCCB Rule §4.225A has therefore been satisfied. During the preceding months, Northern Cablevision representatives have appeared before eighteen of the nineteen notified municipalities and obtained resolutions regarding the Cable Service Territory. (The City of Plymouth has requested that they be allowed to abstain from consideration of the matter) . Northern Cablevision representatives also appeared before the Southwest Suburban CATV Study Commission , on August 22, 1978. The enclosed Cable Service Territory proposal includes the following documents : 1. A map showing the boundaries of the Cable Service Territory. 2. Detailed demographic data compiled for the seven municipality area, including population, number of households, land area in acres, persons per acre, and households per acre. 3. Index of City Council resolutions from included and adjacent municipalities. 4. Copies of all City Council resolutions available as of this date. 5. Correspondence from the City of Plymouth regarding abstention from Council consideration. b. Index to publication affidavits and publication dates in local newspapers. 7. Notarized copies of all publication affidavits. 1650 Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes Avenue South t1,♦i:....on..,t;e NA;n'.xr..n GC VI . 41'1 41C T"'62 • ....-- NORTHERN CABLIEVISION, INC. Mrs. Gertrude Ulrich November 9, 1978 Page Two 8. Statement of efforts by Northern Cablevision representatives to contact all included and adjacent municipalities. 9. Copies of written notice to municipalities included or adjacent to the proposed Cable Service Territory. , Our experiences with the southwestern suburban municipalities have revealed great interest in the development of cable television in that area. We are pleased that all the municipalities within the proposed Cable Service Territory have adopted the necessary resolutions approving our Cable Service Territory proposal. We • therefore respectfully request the approval of the Board so that franchising efforts ` in those communities may proceed. If you have any questions about the enclosed application or about Northern Cablevision, Inc. , please feel free to contact either Jeffrey A. Marcus or Stephen Swimmer at 835-7784. You may also wish to contact Northern Cablevision's legal counsel, James C. 'rickson and Ember D. Reichgott, at Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. , (835-3800) . It is our hope that the MCCB can review this proposal and be prepared to take final action on it at the February, 1979 meeting. Please advise us if the application is incomplete in any way or if we can assist you with further information. Thank you for your kind consideration of this matter. Si c ly, , III _ //advt.,— Mreu ion,fftl. eyrnA Inc. jyt • cc: City Managers Mr. John Boland ( 1650 Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes Avenue South PROPOSAL FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY IN THE SOUTHWEST SUBURBS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY Northern Cablevision, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, by Jeffrey A. Marcus , herein submits to the Minnesota Cable Communications Board a proposal for a Cable Service Territory consisting of the following municipalities: Bloomington Richfield Edina Eden Prairie Hopkins Minnetonka St. Louis Park This application is submitted after compliance with all notice requirements pursuant to MCCB Rules §4.221-4.236. Inquiries and comments should be directed to Mr. Jeffrey A. Marcus or Mr. Stephen Swimmer of Northern Cablevision, Inc. , Suite 1650, Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (835-7784) . Northern Cablevision, Inc. , requests that this matter be heard at the February, 1979 meeting of the Minnesota Cable Communications Board. C. I" I I MAP AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA OF PROPOSED CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY r I .- , r t ‘Ii.„.... ... !.*1. z ;- - •:. '.;;;--. -- sl ,. .111,11v%\f.-/ &.(11,9 " -.. I.:''-f'41L.:3'IL',`"!1.)".'Y'.',4'. ,!'":'/-* i•-:e•\-`D• t ., ....,.: i I- If t! I i 1" 1- M'.11'1 k ' 1:7-:'-, • . .':'...:i1.1:1111'',j11%,•1 Ii1,1110.:1°.'si;as ti ! '- --f, _ : I- -' -- ''"1' ''''''''''* e ' • "•• . ,CI "'""' ''''' t4 ' 1 t: .: 1 • p,...\ ‘:',‘7J ,-, t:-•,10,1;ii‘,1:1 IP LI tltplit';'.110.• ---, IIN -,i6 '., 'fi'' - ------A,',', ,,, \'-:' cAlAT - - ,„:-• - 2• :--, , , . ,....., ., ,, • • rw,..4,,,,!:;.lici,,,,,ii„:;„„,,, , m.1 3 1 9., 1 I.. ,.. ..a,!.. ., • 4 a •tr.." . It,:;___331..L._.L. .. ..-.rini ,,,i,r1,1,:'.i,L.}21, Att. ' Witmer..4„......V.F....,..,,_ :::„7.6....,r , .., .., - .0„,„„,...,.... ,,..„,...,,,,.,,, ,.._IL,_ ,...•,„...._ _ NNA ve_, ;_c!..._. . I' - . ... f• :...A? Q .,.LI:..-,;if.:.'1'. 4- I . 4 1 N ..r. - 0....uo - L •? - , r8 X : ./ ' " _k,..,4„. tlikkipt - i • ,:.I-- ..li.'ii I!! 2 • •• 1....°4 .3 , ..:-_-- .. , 11;_i,-. i .. 1 .• •N .-... \ . P . ••• • ''..... - n - - -,4:a-z • •• / ,.1 .r• r.) ''' ‘ . .11. IITLiAMIl ... '' r' • ,,,A‘ '.0)-t ''711 TrI"--..”-7-`•"';---•'.' - -7- .. • .:" t;'._ ' -- . ... ,. I.e ir”!Int---i,,6.z.n:.:,==•<--'.---..?.43.-...,•I 1 ir F 1 -.. 1-' 00140.0103141111110M. M. vi.," -, - : IIMPSIVA--- \t ' ' " -z riiiiiiihk• ificii,w....1, ii. -. .Di/Ca lAKI IS ..., 111111R, . ,,L, , . , . 4. 1 WAILS% Ik.• ittlY/1114 '.. ' - .- • - MIMI .. . . ... winomppwoki•-as ; ,3 ,. • -re 111111103gartx 4,..c45.6,• yrs A- 1 "119Allikii156511111111."35411111"0.11. 1111a _r , ..• „ ,,, .. .. . _ --- • ,, ..•444.•••Q Iflit.?.."tt__1.'41 ' : NIIIMIlr- • . . r.• -- 1311.111114101/174's •--.0 re J.., .r rix4v- j •:''.'/.':` -'%i.l•l-•i-l•••N---•I Nt_''Fi'I•NS':-A- t wro,• .•"•••-q•PIf--. o-"ft•k.s --. 1-4•-"'..:.; j--. .-..'•_:'''.-•''.'--'a--._-.T•1.:-,.•..,.•....•..:..a---.-..'.4.._•,0.1.2,.t,,._.te', -R...,.L•m-..,..,w.:r4,_iiz fi.2a.:•.,,m:-:.e,is.m.',7,"s'--m-....„'i l•--1,,.-l'-,:--- •_.•._',-,. 4-.-.. 11,I .-...-_.5'-,-.•- ..,. c 1 •T , r• V• ' : iv,. ', ettgliPir ;''' .543, i.: •••'-•• ••• .. --... _,., r.r.7.7,!!' A -- - t ii:•,Z:, - „I :• N., -1 xi • :11 I i • 1111111111 .' rn .... _ _ • togi ,,,3 ,/ ,7•• - .:,,•. i. • W41•• - iii-..-:'-` ..i.:,:i.d. :„„------..t, 35- . ... .. - - • ,.a. „,.... too. '''''' .• 6-' .. ' ' . . • F,\ilirliir°1r_ __. ---- la - - 1p,ottipplelliritt., !:?•'1001111111 • -. . , - --4- _ . 0111K\ 7 • - - - - ;•• - • . ) ..,. __.,--e t'D'-;,:f ,d- - 7 --1-i=-'--;' --- -' - " •• - .- -- x : .;...,.......... . .vianjoilk,„,. ii"" .._ . . , ; ,..,,,_;.3 .., ..•.i, _ - .. ‘.. .. . „.., . . -.. ,. .. i - 4, ts tr... 1 ^ ...3, .• 'i - F ..•, ''..I`1* --.t.,-...,,•.,A.r -W•4ilai1o1jii.a n.illi_u, nkoppnow4--4-11 4--.--•.-.--•,--•4-- --....':,"-6 1."/-6.1"1."---.- •'-•'-.;-.4da.p.---f'-o,r a;',• t‘-;'i.. -1-'0...-'11 6• Z.7„A-..,,._..•-I:.'t''1I'r•-7...-.-..."i7s,.,•,.•r._,,\-_,-,'-,:-. -"- I raiM t . F • 4r ir 46 " . - - - --i/ 4 4 lgg _ - a . ..'.':.':....8-„.-..7.,''..''...:....>."6e•r-'.E•' .lI' .... • - - - :34.---:.... - ' -,‘,4113tak ...- - ..As .., b•?.. 1 t - -'' •sinf-.4.-- i. . . 2 ,"Zia .., .-7, ; -\ ' .1, 6 . Fi-ir ..•, 0.00111ilb AL Ai a di A a a t 4•4 t‘• - - isainetor* . j 1.40. . . •1.11k.4 i;. :,, ......... •Frol......L .....1...:..... ' •'.` . . -' . '- ." ''''.. ' '''' '' • ,I ' ' i' -..' 611111Millier, 5- -imik".'•'I - w r.' ;•,-.. . -14"--."- 0. 1..?„,.< -k„..,..... t • ,.... --,---• . 1 --....,, --,.. - ..,.".'..i., '1,=, . • _ i" ... . k. .„,. „„oerITIrW.111171.W..... -EA. •41tWril 1.,,..4 r . . •-•,... 5. ',. 'ir- ,C't ' 5 --- 7.• \ .>r 1- _., . ,co. . t tgt, .a. tr3.2:d.,s,, - - ' I -- . - • - ..(." - "',, , Ls . 3: . . \ '-. -criotailsar '.fiv - :' Ruj ' - • i. il:' --,- - -.L• O. A..' I , - . . '''....- • • -- - "\*Tigaiuk .,..,.. , ---f, -1---, - --, -- - - ---- - - .. . ' . ‘..',' (....".,* - . : ) ! 4i,••• _Loki iptAartaig". _ : t.---.. . ..• .; . • ,. Ng. - ' ,-.• if c's ! E . . ..." 0 '. _ - :--43 ....- .. ., . . -'111111%1.4"M • -,i ,-, 2 :A -• '; r : • .., -a'-;: -2;. ,`''.:_r'..gyz.:1_ -Q_ 7a.:1--- '-...;:- -.,- ,--• ,-'"-•- '''''"----'7,--,---4-. -- --:*----,--'-' 64 A --.V..2_,.., . i li. il ': .- '' ' 1 i'.!'-a 4; ' ' -A''.imerii&uvw'u.'14?,*1. l''r;--7,,,,,f-,1- r..'• - path,. 4k) ‘----t•.':.'-.i I; ,k,-'7.- . -.---T-'---;..t I _ I t.: ._ .*41- ( .4 . _ .. :;.,, _:_, ,., ,, swpj72. I _7 ,!.,.74i.1. 7 ,.....RIRL. •., ik.,„;. ,:. ' - ',-'%•.-i,-„ ii t - , -7 •• 11'4 '- i - -': '- - ., - ? -*4, -,, T1 ‘..2:!!, .- • ' : ..-s. 7,1-4!---.; 1-'1- P4.. .--,-:-;-------''';::,. 'T. ' - 1.'1 ,,4' , , ii . ,, L i . , I i 1 ------ ro.,i • t'„ _.,„........L.--•-•-,r•-t` 't, '.. •.- • -....4 , 6-4.l''''".. ,,, i i i ..„ - tAl . ; ,... lit. t."). , ;,..................- .• . • . :.....r. -0.421-.;---.,-- -. !... -, ,,, ' . a ,'„d:iii ... •:... .. ,-4-- .. i ; ( (.7.4 . I„ T.; 31 - . •°-, !....u.. . • ..1 .4 1 ,.. . . -, ,- % '• - : ::-. - / "'' ,,- 7; .1 • , '..1 -1=4),,, i'WPOIN14:174 , - ' r, O.: t-'-1..,, ...; ...r,iii •••• ",- -"`--1---4.._ shisegialwar. t-b• rt 1-4 fD HAc_......- . •!... r,,,,, .„ „ : •:• .. -., _ i ! II= 2.* • = .-1., I• .S' .).''• ': 0 t - M...0 LS 4•''''I,. I._ '; .4.11 7, , i . ; . . . .. t.. t.' . 12 .I, It •= r., -s, r, 1 ID - . (I) •• 0 to - f. i' :,",i , - 0 . - '•;- 12,...4.'Er 1. ft '5 .. 411418411"1°1(1)7 41)r) : c"X . it '''. a .\.: ',-- % / t : s : ; 1 , __. . .. !-• 1,-,3;.,, . ,4 t. 2 illeiroviarla.•• 1.nt_s *L. „...c • .,1.:71,1„,.... . ,„. ......,.,,;:.:.,,,...... .t..._ ____. .... _.. _ ..--. . ,,.,. .. \ .`7 ,. , . •••• ..,, . 4;•.• .. ei ..„., ._.: - '2, [1..1 :•, Ivmsweipowaa ;4-. •' i i' 1414<r/ i, .----- L, es...--- . ID •1, ' 0 H4 m MI t.t t-, _.-..-;,.----1---c4--71 • 47-:-. 1--, ,. , '''' '•_ 41, -''''-•44'L'• •• 1 '- .,- 0, \ .-.. .k. .'.. „..- ; i ) 14 1 r. :. Ir., '40 L. , 5 0 H• fD 1-6 11 C 'L 0 ... • kir. ., . •-4 A.- njt +"..-.7.% 'Ir..- ;.6%. . ... .11,:- '.,.. a '..: . ...•4 t•... ' I 4/ - I tD 'Cl W rt rt rt < 0 trl p H. •. ., H. o.:-. Z rr H. 1 ‘,;..,..... ,.. i ...s_....... k ...,. 4 .--..24,.iii.... . , ,.,. e ••• G3 ,-,...tc, --.---. ,c'D rcit; F., 1.--i P. f•-• M ,-1 I. ."'...s; 0 H• 4 --'-•• ,-. - .,4*--- ----'4' -. ..' •-"•(/ m 00 m H M I ..... ' -?1••• . . - s'- '''.:-..,•-\ II, , .... ErS f . '.. y- i : H. H. fD 1 i ip 'CI `---1-- ri . rt , ; ,,,......„._12- i t 1. i.. m 1.... 0 4 < • rt o i t_stit 4(1.,:..._P.4,, ri. I ' ' 4-6;---'-'4..... 07111:1°5\.---•N .' '. - H. •-;.-4•:.-.-", °r1. r) rt II : 4 -9C ••••••-• .LA 8?is+0 li ll''.4.4.44N,,_ 1111:t:z..----•--7-•--&I''''!!')15. .. ill*"- 'I'll '1.....? 7; 1 psi-n" (1.3r:. n) o •ri ..„....:. p cr m co - -- .,....L _1 t---I:-.-•-i......,- --e'l.........if.____I____.._____.___iti_r.77_:,_/ ....Izi.4%;i..;•... ,,,•,...,:i\• -,, • -1' I'." i • n m ri m ri m -o o ' la • rn % !." q 1 ---- - PI - - ' ., 0) ••• ' (0 .P. 3 c.-. --'' z'te, e-,-; •'. ...4_0?.;..4._ . •ILA T-4)0 et ' E.F. ,_ ii --1 . .2_„..k.- isr,,.: rt t R •., \ ,,,,.,•70,71-,.., ..otv. as ..< a' P-. . - :----„/ 1 iri : •.4- ...-,7Sitr-.Z.t.. :-.:6*It) _ _-.IA-,........- . TM... T - w.IQI ii. A,,, \.. . I \ Ci. P r-t• rt rt c-) IA 1 ...:2:r44-./-1' -,9 - . ••ti.:•,...,,.„... , .... Il 0.1 ri ri-1 0 V 1: re.:!, ,,,>- '4 1---- - % - t--1 .\4 .. 7) °I P, •,s, ii, m • co Cr ... „ . .. M H. -,-.4.‘i ''N'-,. M. r. ' a , .i_k zi ,.,t'(- ig .‘• • -i' L.' . o .. --, e.- - .t.- .,.. - • .-ai A) fp rT <7 1 IT s ' '. • ' \ 7 t-. a.- p•-• to . t. ,--- '-< 1, •,:, 1....., , a-t. ; ' . ii: it'lln I : ' . , . -,- ' • . A CS°--'1-',. .'L '* ..,..!1,1-1 :: II. :04 i :7. ...b•• c,,,,,,,,,... w N ~ o Cl) X. w O 0. a CHd ✓ H • n O •'U H co 0 9 0' o x G 0 0 H X * 3 . ; r r rn (ClN- a) 5 0 (Cl (D (o 0 H rt 0 Pr, F'' r-H rt x rt rt 9 G (P o cn Pi G ,Ti alOx00 t7 Cl)( G. 'v 'i '0 to H HH S ( p H 0 0 FW Cl) F•'• F'- C7 ty F rt rt rt 43 U) 23 0 G n G G C) 0 (-) C) O 0 0 0 G I-. G G F•' G G G n 03 n n F-. 0 F-. Fj N hj PI co• 0.. C:" �9 ) A IV In Co N V [ (n C) rt M 0 (1t F.) Co H ,,0 W .0 r o (Cl W F'- ak A In In co N W to 9 G = r F-' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H n C 0 F-, 0 (D Cl) Oo H Z v C) t7 C) H • a) Cl) kO r O. rt V • 0 '< CO (Cl O rt 113 99 (Cl 0 (D r F-' CJ) G H Cn O (Cl 'Ci H N . '[1 0 a Cn 5 rt C H. CI X "' rt O- CO ./ 0 I-, H H F-. N F 0 H ro a- `G 0 v I -� V n F v L.) ON V] L=J !J• • 0. 'ti O In to ..C. 0 rn 0r tz1 • 0 rn CO H N CO - H = H O F-` '0 .A 0" W In Lt1 V C N 00 t 1 rt -J H 0 74 co 1-3 VI rft " 0 La 1-6 O r" L. G d O N W rt t1 (Cl F' F-. O r7 C7 Co 0 03 0 9 H 03 H N N e.-3 0 • 0' Ch IN V N.) '-0 H W En 0 o ---, ON Ui 1.0 N. 9 W V N N 0 U N H H A W V lxn kQ V O l.7 ?. 9 H C9-) -a- 73 ni C!) t'C1 t7 7d Cl) 0 W C" ti0 N In 1.- W Cr) N In H W t0 10 In (.) F'd CO Co W A H N Co W S v C) xi CIl b w C13O 7o C H N (..) N H F-. 9 Cl) H 0" W O. V V H H-+ C) .". C` O O 00 l.) co ,..o A 0 CIS C) 9 En u INDEX TO RESOLUTIONS ACTED UPON BY CITY COUNCILS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY Included Municipalities: Resolution Adopted Comment Richfield October 23, 1978 Copy included Bloomington October 23, 1978 Copy to be forwarded Hopkins October 17, 1978 Copy included Edina November 6, 1978 Copy included Minnetonka November 6, 1978 Copy included St. Louis Park November 6, 1978 Copy to be forwarded Eden Prairie November 8, 1978 Copy included E Adjacent Municipalities: Shakopee October 17, 1978 Copy included (_ Shorewood October 23, 1978 Copy included Savage October 26, 1978 Copy to be forwarded Burnsville November 6, 1978 Copy to be forwarded Golden Valley November 6, 1978 Copy to be forwarded Chanhassen November 6, 1978 Copy to be forwarded Wayzata November 7, 1978 Copy to be forwarded Minneapolis October 27, 1978 Copy included Woodland November 8, 1978 Copy to be forwarded Eagan November 2, 1978 Copy to be forwarded t Deephaven Abstention, November 1, 1978 Letter to be forwarded Plymouth Abstention Letter included C e WILLIAM O.SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON _ ) ✓JACK T.VOSLER HAROLD E.DAHLIN =',' i LARRY L.HANSON RAYMONDJ.JACKSON SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. 9" WILLIAM J.BREZINSKY F ENGINEERS ANO SURVEYORS JACK E.GILL RODNEY B. GORDON :' THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W.EMOND (612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E.ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON. SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING November 14, 1978 Mr. Donald Ashworth, Manager City of Chanhassen P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Subject: Iron Problem in Municipal Water System, Proposal for Engineering Services. Dear Mr. Ashworth: In response to our meeting of Thursday, November 9 , 1978 , we are submitting a proposal for engineering services to study the iron problem in the municipal water system. This study will be a three-phase investigation into (1) immediate; (2) interim; and (3) long-term solutions to the problem. The first phase will deal with a solution to the iron problem at one or two homes that have had repeated occurrences of red water. These consumers have voiced complaints on many occasions and we will attempt to single out the reason for the problem and to relieve it at least on a temporary basis. The second phase will deal with interim solutions to the iron problem city-wide. We will analyze the present flushing program and other maintenance procedures to determine if any steps may be implemented to improve water quality city-wide without substantial outlays of money. Costs for these solutions will be included in the study. The third phase will investigate the feasibility of construct- ing iron removal treatment facilities in conjunction with the new well and pump house proposed in the Lake Susan Area. This study will be on a preliminary basis to determine only if the costs can realistically be addressed at this time. Should the result of this preliminary study look favorable, a complete feasibility study would be necessary to more accurately determine costs and methods of financing. SCHOELL MADSON,INc. Mr. Donald Ashworth, Manager November 14 , 1978 City of Chanhassen Page Two We estimate that this three-phase study will require 48 hours of working time and we propose to complete the study for an amount not to exceed $1,000 . We will proceed with the work and complete it within . 30 days of your written authorization. Thank you for the opportunity of presenting this proposal and we look forward to your letter of authorization. If you have any questions, please contact us at your convenience. Very truly yours , SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. e: 77S) RJJackson:bk i;i,N11978 ` co RECEIVED r— v1LLAGE O to CHAtiwAs q. =ti u C1TYOF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147OCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 d7c. Aaa G' (fib},^ G.e V c ri/re v..i r../ ) 1'sr. MEMORANDUM f /G F n• •,4-4 a...r! +G TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager r y,, �„ / o A e r.r 74°1ai) . A /a ...AO 'ors /in 0.7 FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner 71-1-4 •1.N 7/ DATE: November 14, 1978 7 y c 0.e" SUBJ: Status of Comprehensive Plan As per our discussion of November 13, 1978, I have contacted Jim Uttley of the Metro Council and set up a meeting this Friday, November 17. At that time, I would like to review a schedule for completion of the Chanhassen Plan with Metro Council staff in order to receive any comments they deem appropriate. Bob and Bruce Pankonin are also tentatively planning to be in attendance at this session. I feel that it may be beneficial to have Bruce present to both introduce me to "key" staff people and to receive his input on a revised schedule. At the November 29th Planning Commission meeting and the December 4th Council meeting, I would like some agenda time to outline work activities, meeting dates, requested input, etc. with both groups. Until that time, I will continue to collect and document the survey and analysis portions of the land use element. If you have any questions, or comments on any of this information, . please let me know. WILLIAM D.SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T.VOSLER `aAMES R.ORR _2N i4ROLO E.DAHLIN at��w °' LARRYL.HANSON SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. RAYMOND J.JACKSON WILLIAM J.BREZINSKY ENGINEERS ANO SURVEYORS JACK E.GILL - ROONEY B. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND 1612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 KENNETH E.ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON. TEXAS BRUCE C. SUNDING November 14, 1978 Mr. Craig Mertz Larson & Mertz 1900 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Subject: City of Chanhassen, Cleaning and Painting of Elevated Water Tank, Our File No. 9851. Dear Mr. Mertz: It is obvious that Brown Enterprises, Inc. , is not going to perform the work on the elevated tank this year and it appears that legal action will be necessary to insure the project is done at the contract amount. The City previously granted an extension of the specified completion date of June 16 , 1978 , to September 1, 1978, based on Mr. Brown's assurance that he would repair any interim leaks, etc. , that would occur in the interim period. Since the temperature must be 40 degrees Fahrenheit, or above, when paint is applied, work probably could not begin until next April or May. Mr. Brown has not contacted us since June 28 , 1978. It is doubtful that the City would receive as low a bid if • the project were re-bid for next year' s completion. We enclose copies of the Contract Agreement, Performance Bond and Specifications . If you have any questions, please contact us . Very truly yours , SCHOELL & MAQSON, INC. 0V r978 0 WJBre zinsky:bk co R�� f • ry enclosures �HANy sjv + cc: Mr. Don Ashworth, Manager c'/