Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
02-14-2022 Agenda and PacketA.5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Note: Unless otherwise noted, work sessions are held in the Fountain Conference Room in
the lower level of City Hall and are open to the public. If the City Council does not complete
the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular
agenda.
A.1 Active Shooter Training Presentation
A.2 Consider Electric Vehicle Charging Station Offer from Carbon Solutions Group
A.3 Future Work Session Schedule
B.7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)
C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
D.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
E.CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will
be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is
desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City
council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for
each staff report.
E.1 Approve City Council Minutes dated January 24, 2022
E.2 Receive Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated December 14, 2021
E.3 Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated December 8, 2021
E.4 Approve Claims Paid February 14, 2022
E.5 Resolution 2022-XX: Approve Application of Minnesota Youth Athletic Services for a
AGENDA
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2022
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD
1
Premises Permit to Conduct Lawful Gambling at Buffalo Wild Wings located at 550 West
79th Street
E.6 Resolution 2022-XX: Award Professional Services Design Contract for Crimson Bay Road
Extension
E.7 Approve Agreement and Work Order for the Interim Traffic Signal at TH5 and Minnewashta
Parkway
E.8 Resolution 2022-XX: Supporting Housing and Local Decision-Making Authority
F.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and
submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda).
G.PUBLIC HEARINGS
G.1 Resolution 2022-XX: Conduct Improvement Hearing and Authorize Preparation of Plans and
Specifications for 2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 22-01
H.GENERAL BUSINESS
H.1 Resolution 2022-XX: Approve Joint Powers and Turnback Agreements with Carver County
for the Galpin Boulevard Improvement Project
I.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
J.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
K.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION
K.1 2022 Building Permit Activity January Year to Date
K.2 CenterPoint Energy Public Hearings Notice dated February 4, 2022
L.ADJOURNMENT
GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the
Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.
That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.
Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is
required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at
https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers
prior to the meeting.
Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the
Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be
addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is
2
not a member of the City Council.
If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a
spokesperson that can summarize the issue.
Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the
Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council.
During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in
discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a
thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request.
Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an
individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be
directed to the City Manager.
Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West
79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the
public are welcome.
3
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Active Shooter Training Presentation
File No.Item No: A.1
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Lance Pearce, Lieutenant, CCSO
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
Members of the City Council has expressed interest in preparedness training. The Carver County
Sheriffs Office will provide the training.
ALICE: An easy to remember Acronym
A - Alert
Alert is your first notification of danger.
ALERT is when you first become aware of a threat. The sooner you understand that you’re in danger,
the sooner you can save yourself. A speedy response is critical. Seconds count.
Alert is overcoming denial, recognizing the signs of danger and receiving notifications about the danger
4
from others. Alerts should be accepted, taken seriously, and should help you make survival decisions
based on your circumstances.
L - Lockdown
Barricade the room. Prepare to EVACUATE or COUNTER if needed.
If EVACUATION is not a safe option, barricade entry points into your room in an effort to create a
semi-secure starting point.
I - Inform
Communicate the violent intruder’s location and direction in real time.
The purpose of INFORM is to continue to communicate information in as real time as possible, if it is
safe to do so. Armed intruder situations are unpredictable and evolve quickly, which means that
ongoing, real time information is key to making effective survival decisions. Information should always
be clear, direct and in plain language, not using codes. If the shooter is known to be in an isolated
section of a building, occupants in other wards can safely evacuate while those in direct danger can
perform enhanced lockdown and prepare to counter.
C - Counter
Create Noise, Movement, Distance and Distraction with the intent of reducing the shooter’s
ability to shoot accurately. Counter is NOT fighting.
ALICE Training does not believe that actively confronting a violent intruder is the best method for
ensuring the safety of those involved. Counter is a strategy of last resort. Counter focuses on actions
that create noise, movement, distance and distraction with the intent of reducing the shooter’s ability to
shoot accurately. Creating a dynamic environment decreases the shooter’s chance of hitting a target and
can provide the precious seconds needed in order to evacuate.
E - Evacuate
When safe to do so, remove yourself from the danger zone.
Evacuating to a safe area takes people out of harm’s way and hopefully prevents civilians from having
to come into any contact with the shooter. Did you know that you should break a window from the top
corner as opposed to the center?
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
5
Active Shooter Booklet, Homeland Security
6
ACTIVE SHOOTER
HOW TO RESPOND
October 2008 7
Emergency Numbers
EMERGENCY SERVICES: 9 -1 -1
LOCAL EMERGENCY INFORMATION LINE:
LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENT:
LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT:
LOCAL HOSPITAL:
LOCAL FBI FIELD OFFICE:
FACILITY SECURITY:
FACILITY ADDRESS:
FLOOR: SUITE/ROOM:
OFFICE #: EXT.
8
PROFILE OF AN ACTIVE SHOOTER
An Active Shooter is an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in
a confined and populated area; in most cases, active shooters use firearms(s) and there is no
pattern or method to their selection of victims.
Active shooter situations are unpredictable and evolve quickly. Typically, the immediate
deployment of law enforcement is required to stop the shooting and mitigate harm to victims.
Because active shooter situations are often over within 10 to 15 minutes, before law
enforcement arrives on the scene, individuals must be prepared both mentally and physically
to deal with an active shooter situation.
Good practices for coping with an
active shooter situation
• Be aware of your environment and any
possible dangers
• Take note of the two nearest exits in any
facility you visit
• If you are in an office, stay there and
secure the door
• If you are in a hallway, get into a room
and secure the door
• As a last resort, attempt to take the active
shooter down. When the shooter is at
close range and you cannot flee, your
chance of survival is much greater if you
try to incapacitate him/her.
CALL 911
WHEN IT IS SAFE TO DO SO!
2• G• PROOOFDI PLERA OCFTI ACENS A FOCTRI CVEO SPIHNOGO WTEIRTH AN ACTIVE SHOOTER9
HOW TO RESPOND WHEN AN ACTIVE SHOOTER IS IN YOUR VICINITY
Quickly determine the most reasonable way to protect your own life. Remember that
customers and clients are likely to follow the lead of employees and managers during an
active shooter situation.
1. Evacuate
If there is an accessible escape path, attempt to evacuate the premises. Be sure to:
• Have an escape route and plan in mind
• Evacuate regardless of whether others agree to follow
• Leave your belongings behind
• Help others escape, if possible
• Prevent individuals from entering an area where the active shooter may be
• Keep your hands visible
• Follow the instructions of any police officers
• Do not attempt to move wounded people
• Call 911 when you are safe
2. Hide out
If evacuation is not possible, find a place to hide where the active shooter is less likely
to find you.
Your hiding place should:
• Be out of the active shooter’s view
• Provide protection if shots are fired in your direction (i.e., an office with a closed
and locked door)
• Not trap you or restrict your options for movement
To prevent an active shooter from entering your hiding place:
• Lock the door
• Blockade the door with heavy furniture
3• HOW TO RESPOND WHEN AN ACTIVE SHOOTER IS IN YOUR VICINITY10
If the active shooter is nearby:
• Lock the door
• Silence your cell phone and/or pager
• Turn off any source of noise (i.e., radios, televisions)
• Hide behind large items (i.e., cabinets, desks)
• Remain quiet
If evacuation and hiding out are not possible:
• Remain calm
• Dial 911, if possible, to alert police to the active shooter’s location
• If you cannot speak, leave the line open and allow the dispatcher to listen
3. Take action against the active shooter
As a last resort, and only when your life is in imminent danger, attempt to
disrupt and/or incapacitate the active shooter by:
• Acting as aggressively as possible against him/her
• Throwing items and improvising weapons
• Yelling
• Committing to your actions
4 • HOW TO RESPOND WHEN AN ACTIVE SHOOTER IS IN YOUR VICINITY11
HOW TO RESPOND WHEN LAW ENFORCEMENT ARRIVES
Law enforcement’s purpose is to stop the active shooter as soon as possible. Officers will
proceed directly to the area in which the last shots were heard.
• Officers usually arrive in teams of four (4)
• Officers may wear regular patrol uniforms or external bulletproof vests, Kevlar helmets,
and other tactical equipment
• Officers may be armed with rifles, shotguns, handguns
• Officers may use pepper spray or tear gas to control the situation
• Officers may shout commands, and may push individuals to the ground for their safety
How to react when law enforcement arrives:
• Remain calm, and follow officers’ instructions
• Put down any items in your hands (i.e., bags, jackets)
• Immediately raise hands and spread fingers
• Keep hands visible at all times
• Avoid making quick movements toward officers such as holding on to them for safety
• Avoid pointing, screaming and/or yelling
• Do not stop to ask officers for help or direction when evacuating, just proceed in the
direction from which officers are entering the premises
Information to provide to law enforcement or 911 operator:
• Location of the active shooter
• Number of shooters, if more than one
• Physical description of shooter/s
• Number and type of weapons held by the shooter/s
• Number of potential victims at the location
The first officers to arrive to the scene will not stop to help injured persons. Expect rescue
teams comprised of additional officers and emergency medical personnel to follow the initial
officers. These rescue teams will treat and remove any injured persons. They may also call
upon able-bodied individuals to assist in removing the wounded from the premises.
Once you have reached a safe location or an assembly point, you will likely be held in that area
by law enforcement until the situation is under control, and all witnesses have been identified
and questioned. Do not leave until law enforcement authorities have instructed you to do so.
5• HOW TO RESPOND WHEN LAW ENFORCEMENT ARRIVES12
TRAINING YOUR STAFF FOR AN ACTIVE SHOOTER SITUATION
To best prepare your staff for an active shooter situation, create an Emergency Action Plan
(EAP), and conduct training exercises. Together, the EAP and training exercises will prepare
your staff to effectively respond and help minimize loss of life.
Components of an Emergency Action Plan (EAP)
Create the EAP with input from several stakeholders including your human resources
department, your training department (if one exists), facility owners / operators, your
property manager, and local law enforcement and/or emergency responders. An effective
EAP includes:
• A preferred method for reporting fires and other emergencies
• An evacuation policy and procedure
• Emergency escape procedures and route assignments (i.e., floor plans, safe areas)
• Contact information for, and responsibilities of individuals to be contacted under the
EAP
• Information concerning local area hospitals (i.e., name, telephone number, and
distance from your location)
• An emergency notification system to alert various parties of an emergency including:
- Individuals at remote locations within premises
- Local law enforcement
- Local area hospitals
Components of Training Exercises
The most effective way to train your staff to respond to an active shooter situation is to
conduct mock active shooter training exercises. Local law enforcement is an excellent
resource in designing training exercises.
• Recognizing the sound of gunshots
• Reacting quickly when gunshots are heard and/or when a shooting is witnessed:
- Evacuating the area
- Hiding out
- Acting against the shooter as a last resort
• Calling 911
• Reacting when law enforcement arrives
• Adopting the survival mind set during times of crisis
6 • TRAINING YOUR STAFF FOR AN ACTIVE SHOOTER SITUATION13
7
Additional Ways to Prepare For and Prevent an Active Shooter Situation
• Preparedness
- Ensure that your facility has at least two evacuation routes
- Post evacuation routes in conspicuous locations throughout your facility
- Include local law enforcement and first responders during training exercises
- Encourage law enforcement, emergency responders, SWAT teams, K-9 teams,
and bomb squads to train for an active shooter scenario at your location
• Prevention
- Foster a respectful workplace
- Be aware of indications of workplace violence and take remedial
actions accordingly
For more information on creating an EAP contact the U.S. Department of
Labor, Occupational Health and Safety Administration, www.osha.gov. • TRAINING YOUR STAFF FOR AN ACTIVE SHOOTER SITUATION14
PREPARING FOR AND MANAGING AN ACTIVE SHOOTER SITUATION
Your human resources department and facility managers should engage in planning for
emergency situations, including an active shooter scenario. Planning for emergency situations
will help to mitigate the likelihood of an incident by establishing the mechanisms described
below.
Human Resources’ Responsibilities
• Conduct effective employee screening and background checks
• Create a system for reporting signs of potentially violent behavior
• Make counseling services available to employees
• Develop an EAP which includes policies and procedures for dealing with an active
shooter situation, as well as after action planning
Facility Manager Responsibilities
• Institute access controls (i.e., keys, security system pass codes)
• Distribute critical items to appropriate managers / employees, including:
- Floor plans
- Keys
- Facility personnel lists and telephone numbers
• Coordinate with the facility’s security department to ensure the physical security of the
location
• Assemble crisis kits containing:
- radios
- floor plans
- staff roster, and staff emergency contact numbers
- first aid kits
- flashlights
• Place removable floor plans near entrances and exits for emergency responders
• Activate the emergency notification system when an emergency situation occurs
8• H• PRUEMPAANR RINGES FOOURRCE A ANDND M FANAACIGLIINTGY A MNAN AAGCTEIVR RE SEHSOPOOTNESIRBI SLIITTUYATION 15
9
Reactions of Managers During an Active Shooter Situation
Employees and customers are likely to follow the lead of managers during an
emergency situation. During an emergency, managers should be familiar with their
EAP, and be prepared to:
• Take immediate action
• Remain calm
• Lock and barricade doors
• Evacuate staff and customers via a preplanned evacuation route to a safe area
Assisting Individuals with Special Needs and/or Disabilities
• Ensure that EAPs, evacuation instructions and any other relevant information
address to individuals with special needs and/or disabilities
• Your building should be handicap-accessible, in compliance with ADA
requirements.• H• PRUEMPAANR RINGES FOOURRCE A ANDND M FANAACIGLIINTGY A MNAN AAGCTEIVR RE SEHSOPOOTNESIRBI SLIITTUYATION 16
10
RECOGNIZING POTENTIAL WORKPLACE VIOLENCE
An active shooter in your workplace may be a current or former employee, or an
acquaintance of a current or former employee. Intuitive managers and coworkers may
notice characteristics of potentially violent behavior in an employee. Alert your Human
Resources Department if you believe an employee or coworker exhibits potentially violent
behavior.
Indicators of Potential Violence by an Employee
Employees typically do not just “snap,” but display indicators of potentially violent
behavior over time. If these behaviors are recognized, they can often be managed and
treated. Potentially violent behaviors by an employee may include one or more of the
following (this list of behaviors is not comprehensive, nor is it intended as a mechanism
for diagnosing violent tendencies):
• Increased use of alcohol and/or illegal drugs
• Unexplained increase in absenteeism; vague physical complaints
• Noticeable decrease in attention to appearance and hygiene
• Depression / withdrawal
• Resistance and overreaction to changes in policy and procedures
• Repeated violations of company policies
• Increased severe mood swings
• Noticeably unstable, emotional responses
• Explosive outbursts of anger or rage without provocation
• Suicidal; comments about “putting things in order”
• Behavior which is suspect of paranoia, (“everybody is against me”)
• Increasingly talks of problems at home
• Escalation of domestic problems into the workplace; talk of severe financial
problems
• Talk of previous incidents of violence
• Empathy with individuals committing violence
• Increase in unsolicited comments about firearms, other dangerous weapons and
violent crimes • RECOGNIZING POTENTIAL WORKPLACE VIOLENCE17
MANAGING THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACTIVE SHOOTER
SITUATION
After the active shooter has been incapacitated and is no longer a threat, human resources
and/or management should engage in post-event assessments and activities, including:
• An accounting of all individuals at a designated assembly point to determine who, if
anyone, is missing and potentially injured
• Determining a method for notifying families of individuals affected by the active
shooter, including notification of any casualties
• Assessing the psychological state of individuals at the scene, and referring them to
health care specialists accordingly
• Identifying and filling any critical personnel or operational gaps left in the
organization as a result of the active shooter
LESSONS LEARNED
To facilitate effective planning for future emergencies, it is important to analyze the recent
active shooter situation and create an after action report. The analysis and reporting
contained in this report is useful for:
• Serving as documentation for response activities
• Identifying successes and failures that occurred during the event
• Providing an analysis of the effectiveness of the existing EAP
• Describing and defining a plan for making improvements to the EAP
References
Safety Guidelines for Armed Subjects, Active Shooter Situations, Indiana University Police
Department, April 2007.
Safety Tips & Guidelines Regarding Potential “Active Shooter” Incidents Occurring on
Campus, University of California Police.
Shots Fired, When Lightning Strikes (DVD), Center for Personal Protection and Safety, 2007.
Workplace Violence Desk Reference, Security Management Group International,
www.SMGICorp.com
How to Plan for Workplace Emergencies and Evacuations, U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Health and Safety Administration, OSHA 3088, 2001.
11• LE• MSASNOANGSI LNGEA TRHNEED CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACTIVE SHOOTER SITUATION 18
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528
cfsteam@hq.dhs.gov
www.dhs.gov
19
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Consider Electric Vehicle Charging Station Offer from Carbon Solutions Group
File No.Item No: A.2
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
Discuss Proposal
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority Development & Redevelopment
SUMMARY
Carbon Solutions Group (CSG) is inviting the City to participate in the DirtRoad Electric Vehicle (EV)
Charging program. CSG proposes to install a network of 26 publicly accessible EV Charging Stations at
9 locations on city-owned property and provide 5 electric vehicles to the city fleet, at no cost to the
city.
BACKGROUND
CSG will provide five Nissan Leaf EVs (or equivalent) for the city fleet in lieu of monthly lease
payments in Years 1-8.
CSG will provide a fixed monthly lease payment beginning in Year 9, totaling $11,400 per year.
CSG will pay variable, annual utilization bonus payment to City for each charging station,
estimated at $100,000 over the first ten-year term.
Term of the agreement is 10 years, renewable for two 5-year terms with mutual agreement.
CSG will install a network of 26 publicly available EV Charging Stations at 9 City of Chanhassen
properties (see Page 3 of proposal for full list).
20
CSG will install and operate charging infrastructure on City property at no cost. CSG is
responsible for all costs associated with the design, permitting, equipment, and installation of the
projects.
CSG will pay operating costs for the term of the agreement to include maintenance of charging
units and all utility cost. CSG expects to invest $2,127,528 over ten years.
CSG is responsible for removal of equipment if project is discontinued.
CSG does not receive exclusive access or rights to any site or City overall.
EV charging stations will be available for a fee to residents and non-residents visiting City facilities and
parks. CSG is tentatively planning to brand the Chanhassen locations through the ChargePoint network
and has plans to offer subscription-based charging plans to provide drivers with discounted pricing for
charging and/or a certain amount of kWh charging per month.
DISCUSSION
The proposal helps achieve the following identified goals and priorities from the 2021-2024 Strategic
Plan:
Financial Sustainability
Limits the City's financial liability and risk
Does not require any funds from the City
Revenue generation
Asset Management
Provides EV pool vehicles to expand fleet and replace older vehicles (effective utilization and
protection of assets).
Development & Redevelopment
Chanhassen would be among the first in Minnesota to build a charging network for the public's
use (new innovative spaces and places)
Chanhassen would not bear the cost or risk of the project (public-private partnerships)
Provides convenience of EV stations throughout the city that benefit both the public and city fleet
Economic Development draw to city for users seeking charging
Operational Excellence
Allows residents and businesses to more readily convert to EV, if they desire (improved
operational effectiveness, including through the use of technology and innovation).
See attached for the FlashVote survey conducted in November 2021 on this topic.
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
Discuss and provide feedback on next steps to staff and CSG.
ATTACHMENTS
Chanhassen CSG EV Charging Station Offer
FlashVote
21
22
Carbon Solutions Group
Electric Vehicle Charging Station Offer
City of Chanhassen
October 22, 2021
23
Overview
Carbon Solutions Group is a Distributed Decarbonization Platform that specializes in owning
and operating electric vehicle charging infrastructure (EV Charging), distributed generation
solar (DG Solar) and geothermal as a service (GaaS). Combining these business lines allows
CSG to partner with cities, counties, colleges, and project developers to mitigate Scope 1, 2 &
3 emissions. CSG was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in San Diego with offices in
Birmingham, Chicago, and Portland.
Driving Decarbonization
Cracking the challenge of decarbonizing the transportation sector requires a 2030
perspective. CSG’s community charging initiative, DirtRoad, envisions linked vehicle
electrification projects in a community that enable people and automatons alike to charge at
home, at work and at public charging hubs. DirtRoad brings electric vehicle charging
amenities to communities, campuses, and commercial operators without risk, capital
investment, or ongoing expenses.
Benefits to Host
● Achieve Scope 3 sustainability objectives providing zero-CO21 electricity
● Eliminate the costs and risks of owning EV charging infrastructure
● Eliminate the electricity costs and demand charges from EV charging stations
● Eliminate operating expenses, including network fees, maintenance, and upgrades
● Attract unique EV drivers and creates new marketing opportunities
● Increase electric vehicle accessibility with new EV charging amenities
● Obtain long-term revenue streams from all installed EV Charging stations
Deal Structure
● CSG will install and operate charging infrastructure at Host’s properties at no cost
● CSG is responsible for all costs associated with the design, permitting, equipment
and installation of the projects
● CSG will pay operating costs for the term of the agreement to include maintenance
of charging units and all utility costs
● CSG will provide a fixed monthly lease payment and variable, annual utilization
bonus payment to Host for each charging station
1 CSG will provide Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) to cover electricity use
24
City of Chanhassen DirtRoad Charging Network
CSG will install a network of 26 EV Charging Stations at 9 City of Chanhassen properties.
City of Chanhassen will need five (5) electric vehicles on its fleet to qualify for charging
stations at each of the below locations.
Address Number of
Chargers Charger Type Number of
Parking Spaces
Chanhassen City Hall
7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317
2
2
Level 2
DCFC 62.5 kW
4
4
Lake Ann Park
1456 W 78th St. Chanhassen, MN 55317
1
2
Level 2
DCFC 24 kW
2
2-4
Lake Susan Park
903 Lake Dr. Chanhassen, MN 55317
1
2
Level 2
DCFC 24W kW
2
2-4
Bandimere Park
9290 Kiowa Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317
1
2
Level 2
DCFC 24 kW
2
2-4
Chanhassen Rec Center
2310 Coulter Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317
2
1
Level 2
62.5 kW
4
2
Public Parking Near Medical Arts Bldg.
480 West 78th St. Chanhassen, MN 55317
1
2
Level 2
DCFC 62.5 kW
2
4
Public Parking South of Tequila Butcher 1 DCFC 62.5 kW 2
Fire Station #2
6400 Minnewashta Pkwy. Chanhassen, MN 55331
1
2
Level 2
DCFC 24 kW
2
2-4
Public Works Building
7901 Park Place, Chanhassen, MN 55317
1
2
Level 2
DCFC 24 kW
2
2-4
25
EV Charging Spaces
CSG will operate a total of 42-52 EV Charging Spaces serving the City of Chanhassen.
EV Charging Spaces
Level 2 20
DCFC 24 kW 10 - 20
DCFC 62.5 kW 12
Total Spaces 42 - 52
License Fees and Revenue Shares to City of Chanhassen
City of Chanhassen will receive monthly License Fees and an annual Revenue Share from
CSG for each charger installed.
Monthly License Fee per Charger
Level 2 $20.00
DCFC 24 kW $25.00
DCFC 62.5 kW $50.00
Annual Utilization Bonus per Charger (per Percent)
Level 2 $15.00
DCFC 24 kW $25.00
DCFC 62.5 kW $50.00
26
The annual revenue share is based on the average utilization of each charger, with higher
utilization resulting in a higher revenue share. The utilization bonus applies to each percent of
utilization above a 5% threshold.
Revenue Share = Average Utilization - 5% Threshold x Utilization Bonus
EV Charging Revenue for City of Chanhassen
City of Chanhassen will generate over $228,000 in EV Charging Revenue during the next 20
years, based on an average utilization of 20% for each station.
Years 1-8
Pro Forma EV Charging Revenue Share to City of Chanhassen
Charger Type Charging
Stations
20% Annual
Utilization Bonus
20-Years Annual
Revenue
Level 2 10 $2,250 $45,000
DCFC 24 kW 10 $3,750 $75,000
DCFC 62.5 kW 6 $4,500 $90,000
20-year Cumulative Revenue $210,000
Years 9-10+
Pro Forma EV Charging Revenue Share to City of Chanhassen
Charger Type Charging
Stations
Monthly
License Fee
Annual Fixed
Revenue
20% Utilization
Bonus
Annual
Revenue
2-year
Revenue
Level 2 10 $20 $2,400 $2,250 $4,650 $9,300
DCFC 24 kW 10 $25 $3,000 $3,750 $6,750 $13,500
27
DCFC 62.5 kW 6 $50 $3,600 $4,500 $8,100 $16,200
20-year Cumulative Revenue $39,000
Revenue Share Utilization Bonus Example:
For a DCFC 62.5 kW station with 20% Average Utilization and 5% Threshold, the Utilization
Bonus would be equal to $750.00.
20% Average Utilization - 5% Threshold x $50.00 Utilization Bonus/percent = $750.00
Cost Savings
City of Chanhassen will benefit from a $2,127,528 savings** in capital and operating expenses
over ten years.
EV Charging Stations Cost Savings**
Charger
Type kW Charging
Stations
Charging
Spaces
kW
Total
Hardware
Cost
Install.
Cost
10-year Op.
Costs
10-year
Total Cost
L2 14.4 10 20 144 $82,100 $120,000 $152,560 $354,660
DCFC 24 10 20 240 $169,700 $450,000 $337,780 $957,480
DCFC 62.5 6 12 375 $244,800 $420,000 $150,588 $815,388
10-year Cost Savings $2,127,528
**Cost Savings does not include any savings associated with the use of five (5) electric
vehicles (EVs) for years 1-5 of the agreement term
28
Development Timeline
CSG will complete installation at each site location in approximately 6-12 months and work
on the stations concurrently, electrifying 2 - 4 new site locations per month.
Phase Weeks
License Agreement 2 - 8
Draft Design & Engineering 2 - 4
Utility Design 4 - 16
Permitting 4 -16
Construction 4 - 8
Start to Completion 20 - 48 weeks
29
Electric Vehicle Fleet Leasing Package for The City of Chanhassen
Carbon Solutions Group wants to help The City of Chanhassen benefit from the Xcel Energy Fleet EV
Service Pilot Program and further its transportation electrification initiatives. CSG is willing to provide
five (5) electric fleet vehicles to The City in order to ensure all proposed nine (9) charging station
locations are included in the program.
Model Nissan Leaf or equivalent:
(i.e., Chevy Bolt)
EV Range Up to ~149 miles for Leaf S;
Vehicle Type Front-motor, front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door hatchback
EPA Fuel Economy Combined/city/highway: 123/99/111 MPGe for Leaf S & SV;
Motor Type Permanent-magnet synchronous AC motor, 215 hp, 251 lb-ft
Battery Type 40kWh lithium-ion battery pack
Factory Warranty Limited warranty covering defects in materials or workmanship for
eight years or 100,000 miles
Included Mileage 15,000 miles per year
Additional Mileage $0.20 per mile above 15,000 miles per year
Term Five (5) years term
Buy-Out At the end of the initial five-year term: $7,500 per vehicle
30
Carbon Solutions Group wants to help City of Chanhassen exceed its sustainability objectives
and will continually upgrade or add additional EV Chargers stations throughout the term as
the community transitions to electric vehicles.
Thank you for considering Carbon Solutions Group as City of Chanhassen’s Electric Vehicle
Charging Station Infrastructure partner.
We look forward to reviewing this offer with you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Kory Trapp
VP Project Development
858.354.6273 mobile
ktrapp@carbonsolutionsgroup.com
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Future Work Session Schedule
File No.Item No: A.3
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions:
February 28, 2022
1. Commission Interviews
March 14, 2022
1. Commission Interviews
2. City Manager Performance Review (closed session after regular meeting)
March 21, 2022 (Note meeting date change from March 28, 2022)
1. Facilities Study Discussion
40
April 11, 2022
1. Fire Department/Public Safety Staffing Update
2. ARPA Discussion
April 25, 2022
1. Short-Term, Rental, and Business Licensing
2. City Council Roundtable
May 9, 2022
1. Park Referendum Update
May 23, 2022
June 13, 2022
BACKGROUND
Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting
agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 pm on the second and fourth Monday of
each month in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times
as needed.
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
41
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Approve City Council Minutes dated January 24, 2022
File No.Item No: E.1
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Minutes dated January 24, 2022."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
January 24, 2022 City Council Work Session Minutes
42
January 24, 2022 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
43
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
MINUTES
JANUARY 24, 2022
Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:31 p.m.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan (in person), Councilwoman Rehm (via
Zoom), Councilman Campion (via Zoom), Councilman McDonald (via Zoom), and
Councilwoman Schubert (in person).
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None
STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager;
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, Public Works
Director/City Engineer; George Bender, Assistant City Engineer; Kelly Strey, Finance Director;
Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk.
PUBLIC PRESENT:None.
DISCUSS COMMISSION INTERVIEW PROCESS
City Manager Hokkanen provided an overiew of the current Commission application process and
suggested a new format of conducting group interviews. Groups would consist of 4-5 applicants
and about 20 minutes would be allowed for the interview. The benefit of group interviews shows
how candidates interact in a group; however, there is less individual interaction. Group
interviews will save a lot of time as well.
Council Discussion:
All Council members were supportive of the group interviews suggestion. It was pointed out that
in a group interview setting, applicants tend to give the same answers or agree with another. A
suggestion was made that all candidates submit videos answering the typical commission
application questions in advance of the in-person interviews. It was noted that this option would
require the City Council to commit to watching the videos on their own time outside of a Council
meeting. It was then suggested that each commission prepare a list of questions targeted to that
specific commission to be answered by the applicants in advance of the group interviews.
Administrative staff could do this through email and compile the information to present to
Council prior to the interview sessions. City Council really appreciated the commission input
provided last year.
Council directed staff to collect three commission-specific questions from each commission and
email them to the applicants to answer prior to their scheduled group interview time.
44
City Council Work Session Minutes – January 24, 2022
2
PARKS REFERENDUM DISCUSSION
Mayor Ryan provided instructions on things Council should think about during the presentation.
Parks & Recreation Director Jerry Ruegemer provided a PowerPoint presentation on the
proposed park referendum and addressed the following:
Guiding principals of stewardship, connectivity, engagement, and adaptibility.
Relationship to Strategic Priorities of Financial Sustainability, Asset Management, and
Operational Excellence.
2019 NCS community survey results
Referendum planning documents: 2017 Parks & Recreation System Plan and 2019 Lake
Ann Park Preserve Feasibility Study
Referendum timeline (January through November 8-Election Day)
o Task Force:
Applications (online)
Interviews
Appointments
Meetings
o Ballot languge
o Social media/advertising
o Notice to Carver County Auditor
o General Election Day – November 8, 2022
Task Force make up – two residents from three different zones (total of 6), City Council
and Commission member representatives, and liaisons from local athletic associations
Financing
Comparison of neighboring cities’ facilities and amenities (Chaska, Victoria, Eden
Prairie, and Minnetonka)
Parks & Recreation System Plan Priorities
Next steps:
o Advertise Task Force application, conduct interviews, appoint members
o Staff/Task Form to define parameters of project scope and capital investment
o Identify grant opportunities and project partners
Council Discussion
Mayor Ryan thanked Jerry Ruegemer for the presentation. A question was asked about the
capital and operating components of the referendum. Specifically, how would the operating costs
be funded and is bonding going to affect the City’s AAA boond rating? Hokkanen stated
operating costs would be funded through the levy. Referendums are usually just for the capital
investment. Finance Director Strey said that depending on the size of the project, the City has the
capacity to issue debt for this. A maximum amount has not been addressed but can be looked
into. A concern was raised about the cost of street projects and would it have an impact on the
City’s bonding and bond rating? Strey stated the City has a pretty significant amount of bonding
available. Street projects are funded by special assessment revenue which has less impact on debt
capacity. Strey didn’t believe this would impact the City’s bond rating and that we needed to
look at the scope to vet that question. We can lay it out in a debt study and get our municipal
advisor involved (Ehlers) after key projects have been identified, or we can do it earlier as there
45
City Council Work Session Minutes – January 24, 2022
3
are many ways to structure a bond issue. We will need the project scope but can come up with
options.
Another concern was how we come with a plan in such a short period of time. Smaller projects
could be included but bigger projects should be part of a long-term plan and we should be
thoughtful about it. The Rec Center may need more time to think through.
Mayor Ryan said the Task Force would identify the projects and, with Kelly’s help, see if there
is funding, and if the referendum passes then come up with details of the plan? Hokkanen
commented that we should find out if there is community support to breaking down the project
as opposed to doing all the work up front.
A question was asked about the recent City of Lakeville Referendum. Ruegemer replied that
Lakeville had a really strong social media campaign and did have specific projects. A comment
was made that it would be helpful to see what other cities are doing. Parks, trails and
neighborhood parks are different than facility improvements like a Community Center or ice rink
or swimming pool. Mayor Ryan said we should focus on what residents want as a levy as
opposed to a specific plan. The Task Force would work toward what’s included in the
referendum and use the Parks & Recreation System Plan as an outline for potential projects.
Ruegemer stated that this plan still has a lot of relevance and was created as a long-term
document. The Plan is available on the City’s website.
Hokkanen stated that this will be a fairly intense endeavor to obtain community feedback,
engage the City Council and ask the community to work with the Task Force.
Mayor Ryan stated she was part of the 2017 Parks & Recreation Plan committee. It was an
exhaustive process with a lot of representation, including open houses. What was identified as
potential needs has not changed. It was a strategic long-term plan and there had never been a
plan done before; this is the first one. We also have the Lake Ann Park Preserver Feasibility
Study which was community driven.
Mayor Ryan questioned whether the Task Force interviewing team should include the
Environmental, Senior, and Planning Commission members.
Mayor Ryan solicited Council for a list of specific items or priorities they would like to be
considered or if there was anything missing from the list.
Expect to see smaller improvements or additions to neighborhood parks that might be
included
Increase the amount of greenspace downtown for dogs and walking?
Increase the number of swings in parks.
It was stated that the scope of the plan was to be thinking about the future. One thing that was
left out of the report was how to prioritize all of this; however, a lot of the groundwork has been
done. The study would help us to meet the schedule we are looking at. We’ve already laid out a
plan and we should follow it. Mayor Ryan said the Task Force will use the Parks & Recreation
System Plan which includes a priorities list.
46
City Council Work Session Minutes – January 24, 2022
4
Mayor Ryan asked who is interested in being City Council designees on the the Task Force.
Councilmembers Schubert and Rehm volunteered. Councilmembers McDonald and Campion
also expressed interest.
Mayor Ryan asked Ruegemer if any other feedback was needed and when do you anticipate
rolling out the application process. Ruegemer said he would like the online application to be live
by the end of this week.
Mayor Ryan suggested that the Council be aware that referendum news will be rolled out this
week. Hokkanen stated that a web page would be created and would include links to the studies.
A FlashVote survey will also be available to promote referendum awareness and provide
feedback.
Ruegemer stated that the Task Force would meet on either Tuesday or Wednesday nights.
FUTURE WORK SESSION SCHEDULE
January 31, 2022 Strategic Planning Session
February 14, 2022 Active Shooter Training Presentation
Electric Vehicle Charging Station Proposal
February 28, 2022 Commission interviews
March 14, 2022 Commission interviews
City Manager performance review
March 21, 2022 Facilities Study discussion
April 11, 2022 ARPA Discussion
April 25, 2022 Public Safety Staffing Update
The meeting adjourned at 6:52 p.m.
Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen
City Manager
Prepared by Kim Meuwissen
City Clerk
47
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
JANUARY 24, 2022
Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge
of Allegiance. Mayor Ryan noted they have decided to continue with remote meetings and noted
all Councilmembers are present.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman Campion (via Zoom),
Councilwoman Rehm (via Zoom), Councilwoman Schubert, Councilman McDonald (via Zoom).
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None.
STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager;
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, Public Works
Director/City Engineer; George Bender, Assistant City Engineer; Kelly Strey, Finance Director;
Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director; Don Johnson, Fire Chief; Lt. Lance Pearce,
CCSO; Ari Lyksett, Communications Manager; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk.
PUBLIC PRESENT:None
Mayor Ryan asked the City Council if there were any modifications or additions to the agenda.
After the roll call vote there were no changes to the published agenda.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS:
1. Invitation to February Festival
Mayor Ryan stated the City of Chanhassen is proud to announce the first event of 2022, the 29th
Annual February Festival. Feb Fest will be held on Saturday, February 5 from 12-3:00 p.m. on
Lake Ann and area residents, families, and friends are invited. Hot concessions and free activities
such as horse-drawn wagon rides, dog-sled rides, door prizes, and bonfires begin at Noon. The
Annual Ice Fishing Contest will run from 1-3:00 p.m. and includes over $6,000 in prizes. The
first clue to the Feb Fest medallion hunt sponsored by Charter Bank will be released on Monday,
January 31 on the City’s website. Mayor Ryan said a very special thanks to the Rotary Club of
Chanhassen for their support for this event.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded
that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City
Manager’s recommendations:
1. Approve City Council Minutes dated January 10, 2022
2. Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated December 15, 2021
48
City Council Minutes – January 24, 2022
2
3. Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated November 19, 2021
4. Approve Claims Paid January 24, 2022
5.Ordinance 685:Approve a Request to Amend City Code Reclassifying Certain Uses Within
the Fringe Business (BF) District as Interim Uses
6.Resolution 2022-07:Accept Feasibility Study and Call Public Hearing for 2022 City
Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 22-01
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None.
FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE
1. Fire Department Update
Fire Chief Johnson updated the Council noting they have 33 paid on-call firefighters with 2
firefighters on extended military leave. He shared recruitment efforts which included working
with the City Communications team to send a brochure out to parents in the school districts,
adjusting the hiring sign, and getting word out about the current open position, noting they have
12 applicants for the paid on-call position with interviews starting in February. Chief Johnson
shared that a full-time firefighter position opened in December and closed January 9 with 8
internal applicants for the position and 3 moving to the final interview for the two positions.
They will also be posting a paid on-call Captain’s position in the next couple of weeks. Fire
Chief Johnson shared that there were 105 calls in December, and total calls for 2021 were at
1,078 which is a record and 17.6% higher than 2020 and 7.6% over 2019.
2. Law Enforcement Update
Lieutenant Pearce reported on November and December activity, noting they had 810 calls for
service in November and 731 in December. Compared to the same months in 2020 calls were
down. They have been busy with a variety of snow events and had 69 crashes with thankfully
only 2 injury crashes. He noted fraud and theft calls for service have increased from previous
months but are down from 2020 numbers. He shared about traffic stops, an increase in medical
calls, and noted that domestic and mental health calls were significantly increased in November
and December.
GENERAL BUSINESS
1. Resolution 2022-09: Approve Assessment Policy Updates
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Charlie Howley gave a presentation on updates to the
Assessment Policy, noting tonight’s action is to review and discuss the proposed updates. He
explained that the Assessment Policy gives the ability to assess private property for public
49
City Council Minutes – January 24, 2022
3
improvements which is allowed by State Statute 429 as long as the improvement benefits the
property and the City follows the process. Assessments are a tool to help fund improvement
projects and are part of the City’s financial sustainability strategic priority. He shared the
clarifications needed in the document including modifying the interest rate that property owners
being assessed would pay if they elect not to pre-pay in full. Current practice is charging 2%
above the prime rate and the proposal is to change it to 2% above the cost of City financing. The
second change is modifying the maximum term allowed for paying off assessments to make it
based on the amount of the assessment. He shared other minor updates and clarifications within
the policy.
Councilman McDonald asked regarding a private street with two homeowners, if that private
street comes onto a public street and the City does work on the public street, would the
homeowners be assessed for that.
Mr. Howley replied the intent is that both of those properties in the example would get an equal
assessment just as everyone else that has access to that street.
Mayor Ryan asked what the City does now. Are those homeowners not assessed?
Mr. Howley shared recent history would mean the homeowners would not get assessed. For
example three houses on a shared driveway were not assessed and Staff did not feel that was
equitable and want to put it in writing for consistency.
Mayor Ryan clarified the responsibility for three houses on a private street that have driveways
off that street is plowing, maintenance, and everything is paid for by those residents. She stated
now they would also be assessed for another street which she struggles with a bit.
Mr. Howley noted that is the reason it says in the policy if certain conditions are met, those
would be candidates for no assessment or a reduced assessment on a case-by-case basis; he
clarified they would have the ability not to assess.
The City Council discussed the policy including conditions and clarifications.
City Manager Hokkanen suggested the City Council adopt the policy tonight if they are
comfortable with the changes being made and Staff would commit to refining the policy further.
The reason is that there is a public hearing coming the following week and those residents would
be impacted by the interest rate so it would be nice to have clarity for those residents.
Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Rehm seconded that the City Council
approve Resolution 2022-09 approving the updates to the City’s Assessment Policy. All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
2. Adopt 2022 Legislative Priorities
City Manager Hokkanen noted the City has been in the practice of adopting legislative priorities,
which are distributed to legislators to give them an idea of things that are important to the City.
50
City Council Minutes – January 24, 2022
4
This helps throughout the year in responding to specific requests and proposals without having to
come back to the City Council. In general, the priorities remain the same as 2021, and Ms.
Hokkanen walked through the proposed changes in the document.
Mr. Howley noted the City received $1.5 million in State funding for the roundabout on
Highway 41.
The City Council discussed ways to finish funding for the roundabout in the next couple of years
and other language adjustments within the legislative document.
Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Schubert seconded that the City Council
adopt the 2022 Legislative Priorities with changes discussed during the meeting. All voted
in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None.
CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION.
1. Rate Increase Letter from CenterPoint Energy dated January 10, 2022
Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilman Campion seconded to adjourn the meeting.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City
Council meeting was adjourned at 8:23 p.m.
Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen
City Manager
Prepared by Kim Meuwissen
City Clerk
51
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Receive Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated December 14, 2021
File No.Item No: E.2
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Christine Lusian, Administrative Support Specialist
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council Receives the Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated
December 14, 2021."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Operational Excellence
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
52
Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated 12-14-2021
53
CHANHASSEN PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
DECEMBER 14, 2021
Chairman Tsuchiya called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Karl Tsuchiya, Sandy Sweetser, Jim Peck, Don Vasatka, Scott
Fischer, Heather Markert, Matt Kutz (6:50pm), Youth Commissioner Alex Jerdee.
STAFF PRESENT: Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director; Priya Tandon, Recreation
Coordinator; Mitchell Czech, Recreation Supervisor; Jodi Sarles, Recreation Center Manager;
Mary Blazanin, Senior Center Coordinator
PUBLIC PRESENT: None.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Commissioner Sweetser moved, Commissioner Peck seconded
to approve the agenda as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried
unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS. None.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
APPROVE PARK & RECREATION MINUTES DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2021
Commissioner Sweetser moved, Commissioner Peck seconded to approve the Minutes of
the Park and Recreation Commission Meeting dated November 23, 2021 as presented. All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0.
GENERAL BUSINESS
1. 2021 Year in Review Presentation
Recreation Coordinator Tandon gave a presentation highlighting the 2021 year in Parks and
Recreation, showing photos on screen. She noted they are excited for an eventful 2022.
REPORTS
1. Park Maintenance Quarterly Update
Park and Recreation Director Ruegemer gave a quarterly updated and stated they put new
playground equipment at Pheasant Hills and Carver Beach, a new basketball court at Lake Susan,
a new Chanhassen monument sign, and Staff rebuilt the Lake Ann fishing pier. He noted with
54
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – December 14, 2021
2
winter here Staff shut everything down, draining water, removing drinking fountains, and closing
the bathrooms. Skating rinks are on hold right now due to the warmer temperatures. Park
maintenance also did a lot of work prior to the snow on the trails to be ready for plowing and
they are ready to react to the weather one way or another.
2. Recreation Center Quarterly Update
Mr. Ruegemer gave an update, noting the removable walls are still not in, although the track
system is in and there is a temporary wall between rooms 3 and 4. The new walls are to be
delivered the following Monday and will take a couple of days to install. This will help
Recreation Center Manager Sarles as it has been difficult without the walls. Highlights include
the Artisan Fair with 31 vendors and 600 attendees and a food shelf collection and the Holiday
Boutique which had 40 vendors participating.
Ms. Sarles noted they partner with the City of Victoria for the Royal Ball and Anna and Elsa
from Frozen will be coming to the event. She stated they are in the annual December punch card
sale: if someone buys a 40 punch card they get 10 punches free and it is open for the fitness
center, open pickle ball, basketball, open gym, etcetera.
3. Senior Center Quarterly Update
Senior Center Coordinator Mary Blazanin stated this has been the busiest quarter in 2021 with
many fun, interesting, and educational opportunities being provided for the older adult
community. Three goals over the last quarter were to create new community connections, focus
on lifelong learning, and get resources and information out on important and relevant topics.
Events included an Octoberfest lunch, a trip to the theater, and a beginner’s mahjong class. They
also did an age well in place series and partnered with the Senior Commission for a three-part
series.
4. Tree Lighting Ceremony Review
Ms. Tandon showed a review video of the event, noting the event was held on Saturday,
December 4 and Councilmember Schubert flipped the ceremonial switch lighting up the park.
The weather was fantastic and helped with the attendance numbers of approximately 800 people
which was exciting. They had many great sponsors for the event including Buy Chanhassen,
Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce, Mustard Seed Landscape and Garden Center,
Southwest Transit, and Garden by the Woods.
COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS. None.
COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS. None.
55
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – December 14, 2021
3
ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET. None.
ADJOURNMENT.
Commissioner Sweetser moved, Commissioner Markert seconded to adjourn the meeting.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. The Park and
Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:12 p.m.
Submitted by Jerry Ruegemer
Park and Recreation Director
56
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated December 8, 2021
File No.Item No: E.3
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council receives the Environmental Commission minutes dated December 8,
2021."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
57
December 8, 2021 Environmental Commission Minutes
58
CHANHASSEN ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
6:00 PM
December 8, 2021
Members Present: Kristin Fulkerson, Jeff Harken, Greg Hawks, Scot Lacek, Leslie Elhadi, Markus
Fischer, Julia Adams
Members Absent: none
Guests Present: none
Staff Present: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist
Minutes: The November minutes were approved.
Review and update ‘Know Your Natural Resources’ brochure: The commission liked the content of
the brochure and wants to update the facts with current statistics. The content can be used to put out as
tidbits of interesting information. The content could also be used as a basis in the next Connection
article. The commission wondered if there was a pie chart showing how household water usage occurs
in a home. Maybe Met Council has something like that. Greg volunteered to write the connection
article. Jill will get brochure updated and give to Greg to use for article. The commission had questions
about the water supply. Jill will get answers to them from the Utility dept.
Pollinator initiatives for 2022: The Commission was interested in promoting No Mow May. Perhaps
put something out in April. But should the ordinance be changed first? Can’t promote no mow if it’s
against city code not to mow. Commission could request that ordinance be amended to include ‘except
for the month of May’ in the sentence that requires mowing. Perhaps the city could give out lawn signs
so that others in the neighborhoods could be educated and would let people know why lawns are long.
Or the commission could promote a 3 week mow cycle which is also beneficial to pollinators but
doesn’t require an ordinance change. The most beneficial actions would be to stop using pesticides and
allow plant diversity in lawns. There are other benefits to No Mow May such as less noise pollution,
less air pollution, and less water usage. That aspect could be tied into the focus topic for this year.
2022 Work Plan review and finalize: The commission edited the 2021 work plan for 2022.
Suggestion was made to add a youth component to each event or project. The commission would like to
partner with Chanhassen high school on an Earth Day event. The commission is thinking about adding
a water event.
Media calendar: Markus and Jill will be meeting with the city’s communications manager this month.
The commission will discuss again in January.
City Updates:
Erhart Farm subdivision near Bandimere Park is scheduled to begin clearing all the trees for the
construction of the development.
The Waterwise rebate program will be funded for 2022. Rebates are available for WaterSense
certified toilets and irrigation controllers as well as EnergyStar clothes washers.
59
Environmental Commission Minutes – December 8, 2021
2
General Discussion:
Greg reported on the watershed district.
The January meeting will be moved from Jan. 12 to Jan. 19.
Meeting adjourned at 7:50 pm
Minutes submitted and prepared by Jill Sinclair
60
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Approve Claims Paid February 14, 2022
File No.Item No: E.4
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director
Reviewed By Kelly Strey
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated February 14, 2022."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Financial Sustainability
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
The following claims are submitted for review and approval on February 14, 2022:
Check Numbers Amounts
176902-176981 $589,625.97
ACH Payments $500,123.81
Total All Claims $1,089,749.78
61
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Check Summary
Check Summary ACH
Check Detail
Check Detail ACH
62
Accounts Payable
User:
Printed:
dwashburn
2/4/2022 8:46 AM
Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount
ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 01/20/2022 0.00 490.84176902
BCATRA BCA 01/20/2022 0.00 15.00176903
BS&ASo BS & A Software 01/20/2022 0.00 1,276.00176904
BusImp Business Impact Group, LLC 01/20/2022 0.00 2,448.00176905
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/20/2022 0.00 2,786.72176906
CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA 01/20/2022 0.00 1,162.80176907
ComMin Compass Minerals America, Inc 01/20/2022 0.00 1,853.42176908
DatPrac Data Practices Office 01/20/2022 0.00 125.00176909
HallKel Kelli Hallstrom 01/20/2022 0.00 200.00176910
HerAsso Herreid & Associates 01/20/2022 0.00 3,912.50176911
LEAINS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 01/20/2022 0.00 51,529.00176912
LibPam Pamela Libby 01/20/2022 0.00 100.00176913
MetGar Metro Garage Door Company 01/20/2022 0.00 60.00176914
NatCiv National Civic League 01/20/2022 0.00 175.00176915
PATMES PATCHIN MESSNER & DODD 01/20/2022 0.00 13,648.75176916
ResEnv Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 01/20/2022 0.00 1,467.00176917
ScaAme Scanning America Inc 01/20/2022 0.00 77,365.79176918
WelMik Cal Schelangoski 01/20/2022 0.00 2,500.00176919
ShaMde SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 01/20/2022 0.00 305.45176920
SnoKre Snow Kreilich Architects 01/20/2022 0.00 21,850.00176921
StanCons Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.01/20/2022 0.00 2,606.10176922
UB*02452 DANE & MOLLY SWENSON 01/20/2022 0.00 2,151.48176923
TimSav TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 01/20/2022 0.00 154.00176924
WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/20/2022 0.00 1,312.07176925
WatInMot Water In Motion, Inc.01/20/2022 0.00 1,761.50176926
BranRyan Ryan Brant 01/27/2022 0.00 47.99176927
CenLin CenturyLink 01/27/2022 0.00 59.51176928
CITEDE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 01/27/2022 0.00 51.47176929
CitSho City of Shorewood 01/27/2022 0.00 21,258.16176930
ComMin Compass Minerals America, Inc 01/27/2022 0.00 15,130.99176931
DulSal Dultmeier Sales LLC 01/27/2022 0.00 6.95176932
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 01/27/2022 0.00 212.00176933
FlePri FleetPride, Inc.01/27/2022 0.00 1,675.15176934
Lennar Lennar 01/27/2022 0.00 21.19176935
LITFAL LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 01/27/2022 0.00 107.83176936
MNAGR MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 01/27/2022 0.00 75.00176937
NORASP NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 01/27/2022 0.00 286,090.25176938
PriPar Princess Party Pals, LLC 01/27/2022 0.00 400.00176939
QUAFIR Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 01/27/2022 0.00 375.00176940
Shred Shred-It 01/27/2022 0.00 252.41176941
SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 01/27/2022 0.00 3,108.00176942
SOULOC SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 01/27/2022 0.00 849.00176943
StiBui Stinson Builders 01/27/2022 0.00 750.00176944
SUSA SUSA Treasurer 01/27/2022 0.00 125.00176945
WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/27/2022 0.00 521.92176946
POST POSTMASTER 01/31/2022 0.00 1,236.49176947
ALLDAT ALLDATA LLC 02/03/2022 0.00 1,500.00176948
Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (2/4/2022 8:46 AM)
63
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount
ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 02/03/2022 0.00 490.84176949
ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 02/03/2022 0.00 66.66176950
BCATRA BCA 02/03/2022 0.00 30.00176951
BLAZMARY Mary Blazanin 02/03/2022 0.00 50.58176952
CARLIC CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 02/03/2022 0.00 1,694.00176953
EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 02/03/2022 0.00 1,810.08176954
CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA 02/03/2022 0.00 1,369.94176955
ComMin Compass Minerals America, Inc 02/03/2022 0.00 3,301.55176956
CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 02/03/2022 0.00 825.00176957
CUTABO CUT ABOVE INC 02/03/2022 0.00 2,200.00176958
DigImp Digital Impact Solutions, LLC 02/03/2022 0.00 149.00176959
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 02/03/2022 0.00 454.70176960
FirSta First State Tire Recycling 02/03/2022 0.00 284.16176961
FlePri FleetPride, Inc.02/03/2022 0.00 343.28176962
HolEle Holton Electric Contractors LLC 02/03/2022 0.00 571.88176963
IxoWat Ixom Watercare, Inc 02/03/2022 0.00 27,130.00176964
KODMOO Kodru-Mooney 02/03/2022 0.00 11,866.00176965
LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 02/03/2022 0.00 275.00176966
MNSaf Minnesota Safety Council 02/03/2022 0.00 414.00176967
MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 02/03/2022 0.00 32.00176968
MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 02/03/2022 0.00 55.00176969
NorFie Northfield Lines, Inc 02/03/2022 0.00 984.98176970
OLSCOM OLSEN COMPANIES 02/03/2022 0.00 322.12176971
PATMES PATCHIN MESSNER & DODD 02/03/2022 0.00 3,700.00176972
RAITRE RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 02/03/2022 0.00 1,350.00176973
sarljodi Jodi Sarles 02/03/2022 0.00 300.00176974
pritan Priya Tandon 02/03/2022 0.00 300.00176975
TASFOR Task Force Tips Inc 02/03/2022 0.00 205.98176976
THEIKEN KENNETH A THIES 02/03/2022 0.00 850.00176977
triedeea DeeAnn Triethart 02/03/2022 0.00 21.49176978
UriJen Jennifer Urick 02/03/2022 0.00 25.00176979
WilMou Wild Mountain, Inc 02/03/2022 0.00 542.00176980
WilGolf Wilson Golf Group 02/03/2022 0.00 2,500.00176981
Report Total (80 checks): 589,625.97 0.00
Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (2/4/2022 8:46 AM)
64
Accounts Payable
Checks by Date - Summary by Check
User: dwashburn
Printed: 2/4/2022 8:47 AM
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
ACH ALEAIR ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 01/20/2022
0.00 156.25
ACH CRYINF Crystal Infosystems LLC 01/20/2022
0.00 532.56
ACH Avesis Fidelity Security Life 01/20/2022
0.00 315.70
ACH GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 01/20/2022
0.00 50.00
ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/20/2022
0.00 55.00
ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 01/20/2022
0.00 75.00
ACH K TECH K-TECH SPECIALTY COATINGS, INC 01/20/2022
0.00 821.44
ACH LifSup Life Support Innovations LLC 01/20/2022
0.00 2,364.10
ACH Marco Marco Inc 01/20/2022
0.00 735.00
ACH METCO Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 01/20/2022
0.00 29,521.80
ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 01/20/2022
0.00 4,563.20
ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/20/2022
0.00 288.39
ACH MUNLEG MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION 01/20/2022
0.00 6,486.75
ACH PREMRM PRECISE MRM LLC 01/20/2022
0.00 25.79
ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 01/20/2022
0.00 3.00
ACH SafFas Safe-Fast, Inc. 01/20/2022
0.00 23.85
ACH SNATOO SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 01/20/2022
0.00 484.71
ACH SPRPCS SPRINT PCS 01/20/2022
0.00 103.44
ACH TouPoi TouchPoint Logic LLC 01/20/2022
0.00 1,350.00
ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 01/20/2022
0.00 1,940.23
ACH AdvEng Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 01/27/2022
0.00 3,152.00
ACH BOYTRU Boyer Ford Trucks 01/27/2022
0.00 79.30
ACH BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 01/27/2022
0.00 1,684.00
ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 01/27/2022
0.00 14,151.69
ACH ColFun Colliers Funding, LLC 01/27/2022
0.00 116,566.74
ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/27/2022
0.00 67.80
ACH DelDen Delta Dental 01/27/2022
0.00 2,855.05
ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 01/27/2022
0.00 377.85
ACH HALCOM HALLOCK COMPANY 01/27/2022
0.00 6,043.51
ACH HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 01/27/2022
0.00 1,421.00
ACH IMPPOR IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 01/27/2022
0.00 6,809.80
ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/27/2022
0.00 92.27
ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 01/27/2022
0.00 56.00
ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 01/27/2022
0.00 21,423.82
ACH KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 01/27/2022
0.00 1,279.25
ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/27/2022
0.00 139.82
ACH MOSBAR MOSS & BARNETT 01/27/2022
0.00 165.00
ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/27/2022
0.00 160.46
ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 01/27/2022
0.00 4,726.01
ACH ProTec Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 01/27/2022
0.00 1,636.80
ACH SNATOO SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 01/27/2022
0.00 52.31
ACH SpeScr Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 01/27/2022
0.00 578.36
ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01/27/2022
0.00 298.36
ACH TBEI TBEI, Inc 01/27/2022
0.00 422.00
ACH ULTCON ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 01/27/2022
0.00 690.00
ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/27/2022
0.00 2,981.25
ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 01/27/2022
0.00 10,574.71
ACH AerMat Aero Material Handling Inc. 02/03/2022
0.00 41.75
Page 1 of 2 65
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 02/03/2022
0.00 39.78
ACH BarEng Barr Engineering Company 02/03/2022
0.00 7,000.00
ACH BOYTRU Boyer Ford Trucks 02/03/2022
0.00 11.30
ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 02/03/2022
0.00 760.00
ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 02/03/2022
0.00 26.76
ACH FORAME FORCE AMERICA INC 02/03/2022
0.00 158.66
ACH IndPla Indelco Plastics Corporation 02/03/2022
0.00 507.51
ACH INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc 02/03/2022
0.00 187.00
ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 02/03/2022
0.00 75.00
ACH KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 02/03/2022
0.00 31,963.75
ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 02/03/2022
0.00 31,405.20
ACH LYMLUM LYMAN LUMBER 02/03/2022
0.00 53.28
ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergency Group 02/03/2022
0.00 113,847.35
ACH MACEQU MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 02/03/2022
0.00 128.20
ACH MinPum Minnesota Pump Works 02/03/2022
0.00 766.20
ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/03/2022
0.00 7,328.68
ACH MobMin Mobile Mini, Inc 02/03/2022
0.00 1,620.00
ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 02/03/2022
0.00 16.30
ACH NorAmerS North American Safety, Inc. 02/03/2022
0.00 917.76
ACH NusEqu Nuss Truck & Equipment 02/03/2022
0.00 1,564.05
ACH PLAYPO PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON 02/03/2022
0.00 1,275.00
ACH PREMRM PRECISE MRM LLC 02/03/2022
0.00 325.00
ACH SanCre Sand Creek EAP, LLC. 02/03/2022
0.00 3,500.00
ACH SNATOO SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 02/03/2022
0.00 219.05
ACH STAPRO Stavros Properties 02/03/2022
0.00 709.73
ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 02/03/2022
0.00 4,766.81
ACH VESSCO VESSCO INC 02/03/2022
0.00 1,503.41
ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 02/03/2022
0.00 912.00
ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 02/03/2022
0.00 40,112.91
Report Total:0.00 500,123.81
Page 2 of 2 66
AP
Check Detail-Checks
User: dwashburn
Printed: 2/4/2022 8:56:18 AM
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
ALLDATA LLC 2/3/2022 101-1160-4300 Annual Renewal Alldata Repair Service 1,500.00
2/3/2022 1,500.00
ALLDATA LLC 1,500.00
ALLSTREAM 1/20/2022 101-1160-4300 Mitel Phone System Maintenance 490.84
1/20/2022 490.84
ALLSTREAM 2/3/2022 101-1160-4300 Mitel Phone System Maintenance 490.84
2/3/2022 490.84
ALLSTREAM 981.68
ASPEN MILLS 2/3/2022 101-1220-4240 Clothing 66.66
2/3/2022 66.66
ASPEN MILLS 66.66
BCA 1/20/2022 101-1120-4300 Criminal Background Check 15.00
1/20/2022 15.00
BCA 2/3/2022 101-1120-4300 Background Investigation 30.00
2/3/2022 30.00
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 1 of 14
67
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
BCA 45.00
Blazanin Mary 2/3/2022 101-1560-4130 Supplies 50.58
2/3/2022 50.58
Blazanin Mary 50.58
Brant Ryan 1/27/2022 101-1320-4240 Jacket reimbursement 47.99
1/27/2022 47.99
Brant Ryan 47.99
BS & A Software 1/20/2022 101-1160-4300 Bldg Permit Online App 1,276.00
1/20/2022 1,276.00
BS & A Software 1,276.00
Business Impact Group, LLC 1/20/2022 101-1807-4240 Apparel 1,224.00
Business Impact Group, LLC 1/20/2022 101-1806-4240 Apparel 1,224.00
1/20/2022 2,448.00
Business Impact Group, LLC 2,448.00
CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 2/3/2022 700-0000-4140 License Tabs 192.50
CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 2/3/2022 101-1250-4440 License Tabs 96.25
CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 2/3/2022 701-0000-4140 License Tabs 192.50
CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 2/3/2022 101-1320-4440 License Tabs 654.50
CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 2/3/2022 101-1170-4440 License Tabs 38.50
CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 2/3/2022 101-1550-4440 License Tabs 462.00
CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 2/3/2022 101-1310-4140 License Tabs 38.50
CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 2/3/2022 101-1420-4140 License Tabs 19.25
2/3/2022 1,694.00
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 2 of 14
68
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 1,694.00
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1/20/2022 101-1171-4320 Monthly Service 123.47
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1/20/2022 101-1220-4320 Monthly Service 2,211.72
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1/20/2022 101-1530-4320 Monthly Service 451.53
1/20/2022 2,786.72
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 2,786.72
CenturyLink 1/27/2022 700-7043-4310 monthly charges 59.51
1/27/2022 59.51
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 701-0000-4310 January - 408885285 15.12
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 101-1170-4310 January - 202000002 831.07
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 101-1370-4310 January - 202000002 48.06
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 700-0000-4310 January - 202000002 6.01
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 701-0000-4310 January - 202000002 6.01
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 700-0000-4310 January - 408885285 15.13
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 101-1540-4310 January - 437033333 90.12
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 101-1190-4310 January - 430212154 120.16
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 101-1350-4310 January - 202000002 30.04
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 101-1160-4320 January - 202000002 125.00
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 101-1550-4310 January - 202000002 30.04
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 101-1160-4320 January - 408885285 250.00
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 700-7019-4310 January - 408885285 210.28
CENTURYLINK 2/3/2022 101-1220-4310 January - 202000002 33.04
2/3/2022 1,810.08
CENTURYLINK 1,869.59
CITY OF CHASKA 1/20/2022 101-1560-4300 Senior Day Trip Tickets 1,162.80
1/20/2022 1,162.80
CITY OF CHASKA 2/3/2022 101-1560-4300 Old Log Theater Trip 1,369.94
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 3 of 14
69
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
2/3/2022 1,369.94
CITY OF CHASKA 2,532.74
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1/27/2022 700-0000-2019 Delinquent Utility Certified 47.67
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1/27/2022 700-0000-3140 Delinquent Utility Certified 3.80
1/27/2022 51.47
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 51.47
City of Shorewood 1/27/2022 420-0000-4751 Cost Share-M&O work on 62nd Street 21,258.16
1/27/2022 21,258.16
City of Shorewood 21,258.16
Compass Minerals America, Inc 1/20/2022 101-1320-4150 Materials 1,853.42
1/20/2022 1,853.42
Compass Minerals America, Inc 1/27/2022 101-1320-4150 bulk course 5,570.24
Compass Minerals America, Inc 1/27/2022 101-1320-4150 bulk course 1,852.75
Compass Minerals America, Inc 1/27/2022 101-1320-4150 bulk course 3,840.53
Compass Minerals America, Inc 1/27/2022 101-1320-4150 bulk course 3,867.47
1/27/2022 15,130.99
Compass Minerals America, Inc 2/3/2022 101-1320-4150 Materials 3,301.55
2/3/2022 3,301.55
Compass Minerals America, Inc 20,285.96
CORE & MAIN LP 2/3/2022 700-0000-4550 Supplies 825.00
2/3/2022 825.00
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 4 of 14
70
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
CORE & MAIN LP 825.00
CUT ABOVE INC 2/3/2022 720-7202-4300 Tree removal 2,200.00
2/3/2022 2,200.00
CUT ABOVE INC 2,200.00
Data Practices Office 1/20/2022 101-1120-4370 Intro to Data Practices 125.00
1/20/2022 125.00
Data Practices Office 125.00
Digital Impact Solutions, LLC 2/3/2022 101-1611-4300 FebFest Tickets 149.00
2/3/2022 149.00
Digital Impact Solutions, LLC 149.00
Dultmeier Sales LLC 1/27/2022 101-1320-4120 meter/6 AA batts -715.77
Dultmeier Sales LLC 1/27/2022 101-1320-4120 1 IN flanged Poly flow meter/6 A A Bats 722.72
1/27/2022 6.95
Dultmeier Sales LLC 6.95
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 1/27/2022 101-1370-4170 DEF 55 Gal 212.00
1/27/2022 212.00
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 2/3/2022 701-0000-4140 Supplies 351.00
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 2/3/2022 101-1250-4140 Supplies 103.70
2/3/2022 454.70
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 5 of 14
71
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 666.70
First State Tire Recycling 2/3/2022 700-0000-4120 Supplies 94.72
First State Tire Recycling 2/3/2022 101-1320-4120 Supplies 94.72
First State Tire Recycling 2/3/2022 101-1550-4120 Supplies 94.72
2/3/2022 284.16
First State Tire Recycling 284.16
FleetPride, Inc.1/27/2022 101-1320-4140 parts/supplies 1,675.15
1/27/2022 1,675.15
FleetPride, Inc.2/3/2022 101-1370-4170 Fuel 343.28
2/3/2022 343.28
FleetPride, Inc. 2,018.43
Hallstrom Kelli 1/20/2022 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00
Hallstrom Kelli 1/20/2022 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00
1/20/2022 200.00
Hallstrom Kelli 200.00
Herreid & Associates 1/20/2022 101-1120-4300 Professional Services 3,912.50
1/20/2022 3,912.50
Herreid & Associates 3,912.50
Holton Electric Contractors LLC 2/3/2022 701-7025-4751 Service Work 571.88
2/3/2022 571.88
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 6 of 14
72
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
Holton Electric Contractors LLC 571.88
Ixom Watercare, Inc 2/3/2022 700-0000-4550 Supplies 23,630.00
Ixom Watercare, Inc 2/3/2022 700-0000-4550 Supplies 3,500.00
2/3/2022 27,130.00
Ixom Watercare, Inc 27,130.00
Kodru-Mooney 2/3/2022 700-7019-4530 Equipment 11,866.00
2/3/2022 11,866.00
Kodru-Mooney 11,866.00
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 2/3/2022 101-1110-4370 Training - Elise Ryan 275.00
2/3/2022 275.00
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 275.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 1/20/2022 101-0000-2017 Insurance 51,529.00
1/20/2022 51,529.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 51,529.00
Lennar 1/27/2022 101-0000-2033 Refund permit overpayment-7130 Alphabet Street 21.19
1/27/2022 21.19
Lennar 21.19
Libby Pamela 1/20/2022 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00
1/20/2022 100.00
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 7 of 14
73
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
Libby Pamela 100.00
LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 1/27/2022 101-1320-4120 cylinder universal seal kit 107.83
1/27/2022 107.83
LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 107.83
Metro Garage Door Company 1/20/2022 101-1370-4510 Service Work 60.00
1/20/2022 60.00
Metro Garage Door Company 60.00
MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 1/27/2022 101-1550-4370 Pesticide Applicator License-Neuville 75.00
1/27/2022 75.00
MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 75.00
Minnesota Safety Council 2/3/2022 101-1560-4300 Class 414.00
2/3/2022 414.00
Minnesota Safety Council 414.00
MN DEPT OF HEALTH 2/3/2022 700-0000-4370 Water Supply System Operator Class - Jacob Casebeer 32.00
2/3/2022 32.00
MN DEPT OF HEALTH 32.00
MN Pollution Control Agency 2/3/2022 701-0000-4370 Collection System Operator Class - Jacob Casebeer 55.00
2/3/2022 55.00
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 8 of 14
74
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
MN Pollution Control Agency 55.00
National Civic League 1/20/2022 101-1120-4360 Membership 175.00
1/20/2022 175.00
National Civic League 175.00
Northfield Lines, Inc 2/3/2022 101-1731-4300 Wild Mountain Transportation 984.98
2/3/2022 984.98
Northfield Lines, Inc 984.98
NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 1/27/2022 601-6047-4751 2021 City Pavement Rehab Project 286,090.25
1/27/2022 286,090.25
NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 286,090.25
OLSEN COMPANIES 2/3/2022 101-1320-4120 Supplies 322.12
2/3/2022 322.12
OLSEN COMPANIES 322.12
PATCHIN MESSNER & DODD 1/20/2022 605-6502-4300 TH 101 Project 5,673.75
PATCHIN MESSNER & DODD 1/20/2022 605-6502-4300 TH 101 Project 7,975.00
1/20/2022 13,648.75
PATCHIN MESSNER & DODD 2/3/2022 605-6502-4300 Professional Services 3,700.00
2/3/2022 3,700.00
PATCHIN MESSNER & DODD 17,348.75
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 9 of 14
75
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
POSTMASTER 1/31/2022 700-0000-4330 Utility Statement Postage 618.24
POSTMASTER 1/31/2022 701-0000-4330 Utility Statement Postage 618.25
1/31/2022 1,236.49
POSTMASTER 1,236.49
Princess Party Pals, LLC 1/27/2022 101-1538-4300 Royal Ball event 400.00
1/27/2022 400.00
Princess Party Pals, LLC 400.00
Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 1/27/2022 700-0000-4350 General cleaning-PW building 37.50
Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 1/27/2022 101-1370-4350 General cleaning-PW building 300.00
Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 1/27/2022 701-0000-4350 General cleaning-PW building 37.50
1/27/2022 375.00
Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 375.00
RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 2/3/2022 720-7202-4300 Tree Removal 1,350.00
2/3/2022 1,350.00
RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 1,350.00
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 1/20/2022 720-7202-4300 Chanhassen Roundabout Management 1,467.00
1/20/2022 1,467.00
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 1,467.00
Sarles Jodi 2/3/2022 101-0000-1028 Petty Cash for Dance Showcase 300.00
2/3/2022 300.00
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 10 of 14
76
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
Sarles Jodi 300.00
Scanning America Inc 1/20/2022 101-1160-4300 Scan Service 77,365.79
1/20/2022 77,365.79
Scanning America Inc 77,365.79
Schelangoski Cal 1/20/2022 101-0000-2072 As-Built - 7516 Frontier Trail - Permit 2018-03076 2,500.00
1/20/2022 2,500.00
Schelangoski Cal 2,500.00
Shred-It 1/27/2022 101-1160-4300 shredding service 252.41
1/27/2022 252.41
Shred-It 252.41
SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 1/20/2022 101-1320-4150 Recycling 305.45
1/20/2022 305.45
SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 305.45
Snow Kreilich Architects 1/20/2022 300-0000-4300 Chan Facilities Study 21,850.00
1/20/2022 21,850.00
Snow Kreilich Architects 21,850.00
SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 1/27/2022 101-1160-4220 Barracuda Archiver Annual Renewal 3,108.00
1/27/2022 3,108.00
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 11 of 14
77
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 3,108.00
SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 1/27/2022 101-1170-4510 rekey/install new lock @ city hall maintenance rooms 515.00
SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 1/27/2022 101-1220-4510 repair bedroom locks at fire station 334.00
1/27/2022 849.00
SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 849.00
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.1/20/2022 720-7025-4300 Cranes Vineyard Design 2,606.10
1/20/2022 2,606.10
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 2,606.10
Stinson Builders 1/27/2022 101-0000-2075 Landscape escrow-2168 Wynsong Lane 750.00
1/27/2022 750.00
Stinson Builders 750.00
SUSA Treasurer 1/27/2022 701-0000-4360 Membership-Casebeer 62.50
SUSA Treasurer 1/27/2022 700-0000-4360 Membership-Casebeer 62.50
1/27/2022 125.00
SUSA Treasurer 125.00
SWENSON DANE & MOLLY 1/20/2022 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 098212-000, 8581 MISSION HILLS LANE 1,100.99
SWENSON DANE & MOLLY 1/20/2022 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 098212-000, 8581 MISSION HILLS LANE 26.20
SWENSON DANE & MOLLY 1/20/2022 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 098212-000, 8581 MISSION HILLS LANE 840.65
SWENSON DANE & MOLLY 1/20/2022 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 098212-000, 8581 MISSION HILLS LANE 183.64
1/20/2022 2,151.48
SWENSON DANE & MOLLY 2,151.48
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 12 of 14
78
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
Tandon Priya 2/3/2022 101-0000-1027 FebFest Ticket Change 300.00
2/3/2022 300.00
Tandon Priya 300.00
Task Force Tips Inc 2/3/2022 101-1220-4120 Supplies 205.98
2/3/2022 205.98
Task Force Tips Inc 205.98
THIES KENNETH A 2/3/2022 101-1611-4300 FebFest Wagon Rides 850.00
2/3/2022 850.00
THIES KENNETH A 850.00
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 1/20/2022 210-0000-4300 Meeting 154.00
1/20/2022 154.00
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 154.00
Triethart DeeAnn 2/3/2022 101-1170-4110 Paper Plates 21.49
2/3/2022 21.49
Triethart DeeAnn 21.49
Urick Jennifer 2/3/2022 720-7202-3640 Community Garden Plot Refund 25.00
2/3/2022 25.00
Urick Jennifer 25.00
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1/20/2022 101-1370-4350 Monthly Service 130.45
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 13 of 14
79
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1/20/2022 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 32.63
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1/20/2022 101-1170-4350 Monthly Service 220.88
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1/20/2022 700-0000-4350 Monthly Service 16.31
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1/20/2022 701-0000-4350 Monthly Service 16.31
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1/20/2022 101-1550-4350 Monthly Service 553.37
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1/20/2022 101-1190-4350 Monthly Service 258.38
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1/20/2022 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 83.74
1/20/2022 1,312.07
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1/27/2022 101-1550-4300 garbage service 521.92
1/27/2022 521.92
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,833.99
Water In Motion, Inc.1/20/2022 720-7204-4300 Irrigation Audits 1,761.50
1/20/2022 1,761.50
Water In Motion, Inc. 1,761.50
Wild Mountain, Inc 2/3/2022 101-1731-4300 Lifts, Lessons and Rentals 542.00
2/3/2022 542.00
Wild Mountain, Inc 542.00
Wilson Golf Group 2/3/2022 605-6502-4300 Halla Greens Consulting 2,500.00
2/3/2022 2,500.00
Wilson Golf Group 2,500.00
589,625.97
AP - Check Detail-Checks (2/4/2022)Page 14 of 14
80
AP
Check Detail-ACH
User: dwashburn
Printed: 2/4/2022 8:57:15 AM
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 1/27/2022 701-0000-4300 2021 SCADA services-December 2021 1,576.00
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 1/27/2022 700-0000-4300 2021 SCADA services-December 2021 1,576.00
1/27/2022 3,152.00
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 3,152.00
Aero Material Handling Inc.2/3/2022 101-1370-4120 Supplies 41.75
2/3/2022 41.75
Aero Material Handling Inc. 41.75
ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 1/20/2022 101-1220-4530 Air Quality Test 156.25
1/20/2022 156.25
ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 156.25
Al-Hilwani Juli 1/20/2022 101-1539-4300 Pickleball Lessons 75.00
1/20/2022 75.00
Al-Hilwani Juli 1/27/2022 101-1539-4300 Fit for Life-Jan 4 & 11 56.00
1/27/2022 56.00
Al-Hilwani Juli 2/3/2022 101-1539-4300 Pickleball Lessons 75.00
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 1 of 15
81
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
2/3/2022 75.00
Al-Hilwani Juli 206.00
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 2/3/2022 101-0000-2008 January Insurance 39.78
2/3/2022 39.78
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78
Barr Engineering Company 2/3/2022 700-0000-4300 Professional Services. 7,000.00
2/3/2022 7,000.00
Barr Engineering Company 7,000.00
Boyer Ford Trucks 1/27/2022 101-1320-4140 Blower Assy, motor and wheel, ac 79.30
1/27/2022 79.30
Boyer Ford Trucks 2/3/2022 101-1220-4140 Supplies - Return -44.76
Boyer Ford Trucks 2/3/2022 101-1320-4140 Supplies 204.64
Boyer Ford Trucks 2/3/2022 101-1220-4140 Supplies - Return -148.58
2/3/2022 11.30
Boyer Ford Trucks 90.60
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1/27/2022 601-6043-4300 Minnewashta Pkwy Rehab 1,684.00
1/27/2022 1,684.00
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1,684.00
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 1/27/2022 101-1140-4302 Legal services-December 2021 14,151.69
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 2 of 15
82
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
1/27/2022 14,151.69
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 14,151.69
Colliers Funding, LLC 1/27/2022 480-0000-4804 TIF #11 Pay-go-Note 116,566.74
1/27/2022 116,566.74
Colliers Funding, LLC 116,566.74
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 1/27/2022 700-0000-2008 January 2021 15.30
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 1/27/2022 101-0000-2008 January 2021 37.20
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 1/27/2022 701-0000-2008 January 2021 15.30
1/27/2022 67.80
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 67.80
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.2/3/2022 101-1160-4300 Datto Office365 Backup 760.00
2/3/2022 760.00
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 760.00
Crystal Infosystems LLC 1/20/2022 101-1170-4110 Toner 245.95
Crystal Infosystems LLC 1/20/2022 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 174.08
Crystal Infosystems LLC 1/20/2022 101-1170-4110 Toner 112.53
1/20/2022 532.56
Crystal Infosystems LLC 532.56
Delta Dental 1/27/2022 701-0000-2013 February dental charges 152.63
Delta Dental 1/27/2022 700-0000-2013 February dental charges 213.02
Delta Dental 1/27/2022 210-0000-2013 February dental charges 30.20
Delta Dental 1/27/2022 720-0000-2013 February dental charges 192.35
Delta Dental 1/27/2022 101-0000-2013 February dental charges 2,266.85
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 3 of 15
83
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
1/27/2022 2,855.05
Delta Dental 2,855.05
FASTENAL COMPANY 1/27/2022 101-1220-4120 Grove pins/retng cmpd 10ml 38.53
FASTENAL COMPANY 1/27/2022 101-1320-4150 2-1/2 to 16" S63-4 HseC 339.32
1/27/2022 377.85
FASTENAL COMPANY 2/3/2022 101-1350-4565 Supplies 26.76
2/3/2022 26.76
FASTENAL COMPANY 404.61
Fidelity Security Life 1/20/2022 101-0000-2007 February Vision 285.12
Fidelity Security Life 1/20/2022 701-0000-2007 February Vision 5.63
Fidelity Security Life 1/20/2022 700-0000-2007 February Vision 12.07
Fidelity Security Life 1/20/2022 720-0000-2007 February Vision 12.88
1/20/2022 315.70
Fidelity Security Life 315.70
FORCE AMERICA INC 2/3/2022 101-1320-4120 JIC Adapter 6.18
FORCE AMERICA INC 2/3/2022 101-1320-4120 Flow Control 152.48
2/3/2022 158.66
FORCE AMERICA INC 158.66
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 1/20/2022 400-0000-4300 Annual Facility Operator Fee 50.00
1/20/2022 50.00
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 50.00
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 4 of 15
84
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
HALLOCK COMPANY 1/27/2022 701-0000-4551 Yaskawa Drive 3PH 380-480V 6,043.51
1/27/2022 6,043.51
HALLOCK COMPANY 6,043.51
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 1/27/2022 400-0000-1155 Construction Admin & Observation-Lotus Woods 49.00
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 1/27/2022 400-0000-1155 Observation Services-Deer Haven 1,372.00
1/27/2022 1,421.00
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 1,421.00
IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 1/27/2022 101-1550-4400 Portable Rest Rooms-December 2021 928.00
IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 1/27/2022 101-1550-4400 Portable Rest Rooms-November 2021 928.00
IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 1/27/2022 101-1550-4400 Portable Rest Rooms-September 2021 4,953.80
1/27/2022 6,809.80
IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 6,809.80
Indelco Plastics Corporation 2/3/2022 700-7019-4120 Supplies 507.51
2/3/2022 507.51
Indelco Plastics Corporation 507.51
Indoor Landscapes Inc 2/3/2022 101-1170-4300 February Plant Service 187.00
2/3/2022 187.00
Indoor Landscapes Inc 187.00
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 1/20/2022 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 55.00
1/20/2022 55.00
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 1/27/2022 101-1170-4110 portfolio/tape/dispenser/tissue 92.27
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 5 of 15
85
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
1/27/2022 92.27
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 147.27
KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 1/27/2022 101-1370-4170 unleaded 87 Eth 10/ULS Dyed Nordic B35 21,423.82
1/27/2022 21,423.82
KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 21,423.82
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 1/27/2022 101-1140-4302 Local 49 Labor Matter-December 2021 1,279.25
1/27/2022 1,279.25
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 2/3/2022 605-6502-4300 Professional Services 31,963.75
2/3/2022 31,963.75
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 33,243.00
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 2/3/2022 605-6503-4300 TH 101 Reconstruction 1,721.36
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 2/3/2022 605-6502-4300 TH 101 Reconstruction 15,288.14
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 2/3/2022 601-6043-4300 Minnewashta Parkway Rehab 14,395.70
2/3/2022 31,405.20
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 31,405.20
K-TECH SPECIALTY COATINGS, INC 1/20/2022 101-1320-4150 Materials 821.44
1/20/2022 821.44
K-TECH SPECIALTY COATINGS, INC 821.44
Life Support Innovations LLC 1/20/2022 201-0000-4705 Equipment 2,364.10
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 6 of 15
86
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
1/20/2022 2,364.10
Life Support Innovations LLC 2,364.10
LYMAN LUMBER 2/3/2022 101-1550-4150 Materials 53.28
2/3/2022 53.28
LYMAN LUMBER 53.28
Macqueen Emergency Group 2/3/2022 201-0000-4705 Equipment 620.36
Macqueen Emergency Group 2/3/2022 400-4115-4705 Equipment 113,226.99
2/3/2022 113,847.35
Macqueen Emergency Group 113,847.35
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 2/3/2022 701-0000-4120 Supplies 128.20
2/3/2022 128.20
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 128.20
Marco Inc 1/20/2022 400-4109-4703 Konica Copiers Lease 735.00
1/20/2022 735.00
Marco Inc 735.00
Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 1/20/2022 101-1250-3816 December SAC -298.20
Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 1/20/2022 701-0000-2023 December SAC 29,820.00
1/20/2022 29,521.80
Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 29,521.80
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 7 of 15
87
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
Minnesota Pump Works 2/3/2022 701-0000-4551 Supplies 766.20
2/3/2022 766.20
Minnesota Pump Works 766.20
MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 1/20/2022 101-1250-3818 December Surcharge -93.12
MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 1/20/2022 101-0000-2022 December Surcharge 4,656.32
1/20/2022 4,563.20
MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 4,563.20
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 1/20/2022 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 288.39
1/20/2022 288.39
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 1/27/2022 101-1350-4320 Electricity charges 139.82
1/27/2022 139.82
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 700-0000-4320 January Utilities 212.53
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 101-1350-4320 January Utilities 166.09
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 101-1350-4320 January Utilities 236.16
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 101-1350-4320 January Utilities 46.01
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 101-1350-4320 January Utilities 29.22
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 605-6502-4300 January Utilities 69.05
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 101-1350-4320 January Utilities 5,477.47
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 101-1600-4320 January Utilities 441.92
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 701-0000-4320 January Utilities 505.05
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 101-1350-4320 January Utilities 102.76
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 2/3/2022 101-1350-4320 January Utilities 42.42
2/3/2022 7,328.68
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 7,756.89
Mobile Mini, Inc 2/3/2022 101-1617-4410 Rental 540.00
Mobile Mini, Inc 2/3/2022 101-1617-4410 Rental 540.00
Mobile Mini, Inc 2/3/2022 101-1617-4410 Rental 540.00
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 8 of 15
88
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
2/3/2022 1,620.00
Mobile Mini, Inc 1,620.00
MOSS & BARNETT 1/27/2022 210-0000-1193 Professional Services-December 2021 165.00
1/27/2022 165.00
MOSS & BARNETT 165.00
MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION 1/20/2022 101-1110-4360 Membership 6,486.75
1/20/2022 6,486.75
MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION 6,486.75
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 1/27/2022 101-1550-4140 winter blades/wiper blades 30.70
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 1/27/2022 101-1320-4120 oil filter -10.90
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 1/27/2022 101-1550-4140 oil filter/boxed capsules 24.27
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 1/27/2022 701-0000-4140 coupling 8.20
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 1/27/2022 101-1320-4140 blower motor without wheel 42.06
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 1/27/2022 101-1320-4140 air brake tube/tubing fitting 21.60
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 1/27/2022 101-1550-4140 capsules/oil filter/lamp 44.53
1/27/2022 160.46
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 2/3/2022 101-1320-4120 Supplies 5.12
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 2/3/2022 101-1320-4140 Supplies 4.16
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 2/3/2022 101-1320-4140 Supplies 7.02
2/3/2022 16.30
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 176.76
North American Safety, Inc.2/3/2022 701-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 458.88
North American Safety, Inc.2/3/2022 700-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 458.88
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 9 of 15
89
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
2/3/2022 917.76
North American Safety, Inc. 917.76
Nuss Truck & Equipment 2/3/2022 101-1320-4140 Supplies 285.48
Nuss Truck & Equipment 2/3/2022 101-1320-4140 Supplies 811.69
Nuss Truck & Equipment 2/3/2022 101-1550-4140 Supplies 466.88
2/3/2022 1,564.05
Nuss Truck & Equipment 1,564.05
PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON 2/3/2022 101-1550-4120 Equipment 1,275.00
2/3/2022 1,275.00
PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON 1,275.00
Potentia MN Solar 1/27/2022 101-1170-4320 monthly utilities 1,162.45
Potentia MN Solar 1/27/2022 700-0000-4320 monthly utilities 1,231.45
Potentia MN Solar 1/27/2022 101-1190-4320 monthly utilities 2,332.11
1/27/2022 4,726.01
Potentia MN Solar 4,726.01
PRECISE MRM LLC 1/20/2022 101-1320-4310 Telephone 25.79
1/20/2022 25.79
PRECISE MRM LLC 2/3/2022 101-1320-4310 Subscription 325.00
2/3/2022 325.00
PRECISE MRM LLC 350.79
Premium Waters, Inc 1/20/2022 101-1550-4120 Jan Service 3.00
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 10 of 15
90
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
1/20/2022 3.00
Premium Waters, Inc 3.00
Pro-Tec Design, Inc.1/27/2022 101-1160-4220 Milestone Xprotect Annual Renewal 1,636.80
1/27/2022 1,636.80
Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 1,636.80
Safe-Fast, Inc.1/20/2022 700-0000-4240 Disposable masks 7.95
Safe-Fast, Inc.1/20/2022 101-1320-4240 Disposable masks 7.95
Safe-Fast, Inc.1/20/2022 701-0000-4240 Disposable masks 7.95
1/20/2022 23.85
Safe-Fast, Inc. 23.85
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1530-4040 Employee Assistance Program 30.43
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 720-0000-4040 Employee Assistance Program 60.86
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1550-4040 Employee Assistance Program 243.44
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1220-4483 Employee Assistance Program 1,126.46
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 210-1125-4040 Employee Assistance Program 30.43
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1520-4040 Employee Assistance Program 30.43
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 720-7202-4040 Employee Assistance Program 15.22
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1125-4040 Employee Assistance Program 60.86
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1320-4040 Employee Assistance Program 304.30
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1560-4040 Employee Assistance Program 30.43
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1220-4040 Employee Assistance Program 91.29
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1130-4040 Employee Assistance Program 121.72
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1160-4040 Employee Assistance Program 91.29
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1420-4040 Employee Assistance Program 121.72
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 720-7201-4040 Employee Assistance Program 15.22
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 701-0000-4040 Employee Assistance Program 121.72
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1600-4040 Employee Assistance Program 60.86
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1120-4040 Employee Assistance Program 152.15
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1170-4040 Employee Assistance Program 30.43
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1250-4040 Employee Assistance Program 243.44
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1370-4040 Employee Assistance Program 91.29
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 11 of 15
91
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1310-4040 Employee Assistance Program 213.01
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 101-1260-4040 Employee Assistance Program 30.43
Sand Creek EAP, LLC.2/3/2022 700-0000-4040 Employee Assistance Program 182.57
2/3/2022 3,500.00
Sand Creek EAP, LLC. 3,500.00
SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 1/20/2022 101-1370-4705 Equipment 484.71
1/20/2022 484.71
SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 1/27/2022 101-1370-4705 1/2DR 12PT 1 5/16" SHL SKT 30.51
SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 1/27/2022 101-1370-4705 1/2DR 12PT 1 1/8" SHL SKT 21.80
1/27/2022 52.31
SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 2/3/2022 101-1370-4260 Equipment 219.05
2/3/2022 219.05
SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 756.07
Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 1/27/2022 101-1250-4240 shirts/jackets 578.36
1/27/2022 578.36
Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 578.36
SPRINT PCS 1/20/2022 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 51.72
SPRINT PCS 1/20/2022 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 51.72
1/20/2022 103.44
SPRINT PCS 103.44
Stavros Properties 2/3/2022 101-1171-4300 2021 Easement Fees 709.73
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 12 of 15
92
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
2/3/2022 709.73
Stavros Properties 709.73
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1/27/2022 700-0000-4140 lamp/core deposit 298.36
1/27/2022 298.36
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 298.36
TBEI, Inc 1/27/2022 101-1550-4140 mounting kit fender set 422.00
1/27/2022 422.00
TBEI, Inc 422.00
TouchPoint Logic LLC 1/20/2022 210-0000-4300 Repair of CC AV System Switcher 1,350.00
1/20/2022 1,350.00
TouchPoint Logic LLC 1,350.00
ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 1/27/2022 700-7043-4150 West WTP Service Work 690.00
1/27/2022 690.00
ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 690.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 720-0000-4310 Monthly Service 574.75
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1250-4310 Monthly Service 361.32
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1220-4310 Monthly Service 40.01
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1310-4310 Monthly Service 202.81
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1170-4310 Monthly Service 36.22
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1520-4310 Monthly Service 41.22
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1600-4310 Monthly Service 174.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1160-4310 Monthly Service 128.66
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 571.74
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 13 of 15
93
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1260-4310 Monthly Service 76.23
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1120-4310 Monthly Service 200.59
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1320-4310 Monthly Service 371.96
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-0000-2033 Monthly Service 11.08
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 427.01
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1530-4310 Monthly Service 41.22
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 162.63
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 210-0000-4310 Monthly Service 31.22
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1550-4310 Monthly Service 488.22
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 162.63
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1220-4310 Monthly Service 533.78
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1370-4310 Monthly Service 89.50
VERIZON WIRELESS 2/3/2022 101-1110-4300 Monthly Service 40.01
2/3/2022 4,766.81
VERIZON WIRELESS 4,766.81
VESSCO INC 2/3/2022 700-7019-4120 Supplies 508.04
VESSCO INC 2/3/2022 700-7043-4120 Supplies 995.37
2/3/2022 1,503.41
VESSCO INC 1,503.41
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 1/27/2022 720-7025-4300 2021 Pond Maintenance Project-December 2021 1,356.00
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 1/27/2022 700-0000-4300 WTP Radon & Humidity Mitigatin Study-December 2021 1,625.25
1/27/2022 2,981.25
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 2/3/2022 701-7013-4300 Professional Services 912.00
2/3/2022 912.00
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 3,893.25
XCEL ENERGY INC 1/20/2022 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 1,940.23
1/20/2022 1,940.23
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 14 of 15
94
Last Name Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount
XCEL ENERGY INC 1/27/2022 101-1350-4320 electricty charges 269.01
XCEL ENERGY INC 1/27/2022 101-1350-4320 electricty charges 131.52
XCEL ENERGY INC 1/27/2022 101-1600-4320 electricty charges 26.46
XCEL ENERGY INC 1/27/2022 101-1350-4320 electricty charges 35.17
XCEL ENERGY INC 1/27/2022 701-0000-4320 electricty charges 3,975.08
XCEL ENERGY INC 1/27/2022 700-0000-4320 electricty charges 6,888.36
XCEL ENERGY INC 1/27/2022 700-0000-4320 electricty charges -750.89
1/27/2022 10,574.71
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1170-4320 Utilities 1,354.10
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 700-7019-4320 Monthly Service 4,255.28
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1171-4320 Monthly Service 43.74
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1170-4320 Monthly Service 2,304.99
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1550-4320 Monthly Service 440.98
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1220-4320 Utilities 1,166.87
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 64.54
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 24,335.74
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 507.78
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1220-4320 Monthly Service 1,405.92
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 117.59
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1190-4320 Monthly Service 2,115.37
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1540-4320 Monthly Service 1,079.14
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1190-4320 Utilities 644.22
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 101-1171-4320 Utilities 39.41
XCEL ENERGY INC 2/3/2022 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 237.24
2/3/2022 40,112.91
XCEL ENERGY INC 52,627.85
500,123.81
AP - Check Detail-ACH (2/4/2022)Page 15 of 15
95
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item
Resolution 2022-XX: Approve Application of Minnesota Youth Athletic
Services for a Premises Permit to Conduct Lawful Gambling at Buffalo Wild
Wings located at 550 West 79th Street
File No.Item No: E.5
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council Approves an Application of Minnesota Youth Athletic Services for a
Premises Permit to Conduct Lawful Gambling at Buffalo Wild Wings located at 550 West 79th
Street subject to the Conditions of Approval in the Staff Report."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
Minnesota Youth Athletic Services has submitted a request for City Council approval to conduct lawful
gambling at the Buffalo Wild Wings located at 550 West 79th Street.
BACKGROUND
Minnesota Youth Athletic Services (MYAS) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and currently holds
lawful gambling License #04819 issued by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. In order to conduct
lawful gambling at Buffalo Wild Wings located at 550 West 79th Street, MYAS must apply for a
Gambling Premises Permit LG214 from the State of Minnesota. The permit application must be
approved by the City Council and a resolution provided to submit with the application.
96
MYAS is also submitting Form LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity as an attachment to Form
LG214. City Council approval is not required for this form.
The Chanhassen American Legion ("Legion") is the only other organization in Chanhassen that has
been granted a gambling license from the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. In addition to the lawful
gambling conducted at the Legion located at 290 Lake Drive East, the City Council adopted a resolution
on May 10, 2021 approving an application for an off-site premises permit for the Legion to conduct
lawful gambling at Chanhassen Brewing Company, located at 951 West 78th Street.
DISCUSSION
Background Investigations:
Section 10-153(b) of the Chanhassen City Code states that each organization licensed to conduct
gambling in the City shall complete the City's investigation form and submit any additional information
required by the City. The MYAS Officers and Gambling Manager are listed below:
Dawson Blanck, Chief Executive Officer
Dara Northfield, Chief Financial Officer
Deb Dahl, Gambling Manager
Law Enforcement conducted background investigations, including criminal history, driving records,
and outstanding warrants on the officers and manager listed above. No negative comments were found.
Distribution of Proceeds:
Section 10-152 of the Chanhassen City Code requires contributions from the organization to the City as
outlined below:
a. Each organization licensed to conduct gambling within the city shall contribute to the city, for
distribution by the city for lawful purposes, at least ten percent of the organization's net
profits derived from lawful gambling. For purposes of this section, net profits are profits less
amounts expended for allowable expenses.
b. Each organization conducting lawful gambling within the city must expend at least 50 percent of
its net profits derived from lawful gambling on lawful purposes conducted or located within the
city or any municipality contiguous to the city. The contribution required in subsection (a) above
shall be considered as part of the 50 percent expenditure.
c. An organization that conducts gambling on fewer than five days in a calendar year is exempt
from the requirements of this section.
According to State Statute and the Minnesota Gambling Control Board website, cities are restricted on
how they may spend these funds. Organizations must make 10% fund checks payable to the city
requiring the funds, and not to any other payee. A licensed organization that contributes to the 10%
fund may not be the beneficiary of that fund. A required contribution is different from a voluntary
contribution to units of government for government programs and projects, and cities or counties are
not required to report voluntary contributions to the Board. Local units of government are required to
spend the 10% contribution funds in the same manner as licensed organizations.
97
Copies of the organization's Minnesota Gambling Tax Return must be filed with the City Finance
Director each month, along with a check for 10% of the organization's net profits derived from lawful
gambling.
Each city implementing the local contribution fund is required to submit a calendar-year report to the
Minnesota Gambling Control Board detailing the amounts collected and spent. A copy of the City's
2021 Minnesota Gambling Tax Return is attached to this report for reference.
BUDGET
N/A
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving an application from MYAS for a
premises permit to allow lawful gambling at Buffalo Wild Wings in Chanhassen with the following
conditions:
1. Copies of the MYAS Minnesota Gambling Tax Return must be filed with the City of Chanhassen
Finance Director each month, along with a check for 10% of the organization's net profits derived
from lawful gambling.
2. MYAS must expend at least 50 percent of its net profits derived from lawful gambling on lawful
purposes conducted or located within the City or any municipality contiguous to the City. The
10% contribution required above shall be considered as part of the 50 percent expenditure.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Lawful Gambling Application
LG214 Premises Permit Application
LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity
Minnesota Youth Athletic Services Gambling License
Drawing of Premises
2021 City of Chanhassen Annual Report to Minnesota Gambling Control Board
98
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: February 14, 2022 RESOLUTION NO:2022-XX
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION FROM
MINNESOTA YOUTH ATHLETIC SERVICES TO ALLOW LAWFUL GAMBLING AT
BUFFALO WILD WINGS
WHEREAS,Minnesota Youth Athletic Services (“MYAS”), is a 501(c)(3) non-profit
organization established in 1991 with headquarters located in Spring Lake Park, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS,MYAS currently holds a lawful gambling license issued by the Minnesota
Gambling Control Board; and
WHEREAS, MYAS is applying for a premises permit to conduct lawful gambling at
Buffalo Wild Wings located at 550 West 79
th Street; and
WHEREAS,MYAS has entered into a lease with Buffalo Wild Wings to conduct lawful
gambling on the premises; and
WHEREAS,the Minnesota Gambling Control Board requires a City Council resolution
approving the premises permit application.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chanhassen, Minnesota approves the application from Minnesota Youth Athletic Services for a
premises permit to allow lawful gambling at Buffalo Wild Wings located at 550 West 79
th Street;
and that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to provide a copy of this Resolution to be included
with the permit application to the Department of Gaming, Gambling Control Division, State of
Minnesota.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 14
th day of February,
2022.
ATTEST:
Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Resolution 2022-XX: Award Professional Services Design Contract for
Crimson Bay Road Extension
File No.ENG 18-03 Item No: E.6
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution awarding the design contract for the Crimson Bay
Road Extension to Bolton & Menk, Inc."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
As part of the Arboretum Area Transportation Plan (AATP), improvements are needed to the existing
intersection of Crimson Bay Road and TH5. The project is planned for 2023 construction.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
The preferred alternative as a result of the AATP is to remove the existing access at TH5 and connect
Crimson Bay Road through to Dogwood Road to the north. Dogwood Road was stubbed out as a future
through street. The design process will further vet this concept along with others options. This project is
supported by the entire AATP partners, including MnDOT, as a way manage access to the Highway.
112
Public utility extensions are needed, including a sanitary sewer lift station at the south end of Crimson
Bay Road. Private property Assessments for extending these public utilities per the 429 process will be
part of the project.
The AATP still has a team assembled for this project to help support our public outreach process.
Consistency of messaging and the logistical tools of public outreach between this project, the
Arboretum's relocated entrance, and the widening of TH5 will be important to maintain.
BUDGET
The City successfully received a MnDOT Local Partnership Program (LPP) Grant last September for
this project since it involves locally led work on a trunk highway.
The current budget per the CIP project is as follows:
Source Amount
LPP Grant from MnDOT $700,000
PMP (Private Property Assessments)$120,000
PMP (City cost)$180,000
Stormwater Utility Fund $100,000
Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund $200,000
Water Utility Fund $200,000
Total $1,500,000
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council adopt the Resolution.
ATTACHMENTS
BMI Proposal
Contract
CIP Project ST-050
Resolution Contract for Crimson Bay Road Design Services
Project Layout
113
January 21, 2022
Charles Howley
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
7700 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
RE: Proposal for Professional Engineering Services
Crimson Bay Roadway Improvements
Dear Charles,
We are pleased to present the following proposal to support the City of Chanhassen in design and
construction of Crimson Bay Road from 78th Street to Highway 5. This proposal is for professional
engineering, surveying and construction administration services. Upon approval of this proposal, Bolton
& Menk will work closely with City staff to complete preliminary and final design as well as public
engagement and construction administration tasks as needed to construct the roadway project as intended.
Project Understanding
Crimson Bay Road Improvements
This project was identified as part of the recently completed Arboretum Area Transportation Plan (AATP)
as a critical improvement on the local roadway system to maintain safe and reasonable access given the
long-term vision for the Highway 5 corridor to continue as a 4-lane divided roadway to the west. One
phase of this project, which will include work in the intersection of TH 5/Crimson Bay Road to alter the
existing U of M Landscape Arboretum access will be completed in approximately 2025. Improvements
on Crimson Bay Road will consist of both completing the connection up to 78th Street as well as severing
access directly to Highway 5 by installing a cul-de-sac south of the southernmost driveway. A raised
median is proposed to be installed on Highway 5 to replace the left turn lane as part of the access closure.
Coordination with MnDOT and future Highway 5 plans will be required to finalize the exact scope of the
access closure. A path or cartway will be provided along the old roadway to facilitate emergency service
access from Highway 5 to the new cul-de-sac. Municipal watermain will be extended from 78th Street to
the proposed cul-de-sac to serve properties along the west side of the street which are currently on private
wells. Municipal sanitary sewer, including a lift station, forcemain and gravity service pipe, to serve
properties on the west side of the street which are currently on private septic systems. Right-of-way
acquisition will be necessary to complete the connection at the north end of the project. Negotiation with
the adjacent property owners and or the University of Minnesota will be required.
This project was successful in receiving MnDOT Local Partnership Program (LPP) funds which require
construction of the project in 2023. LPP funds will also require a specific MnDOT review and approval
process to be followed. Our team is experienced with this process and will efficiently manage required
submittals and approvals.
Proposed Scope of Work
The city of Chanhassen can expect our team to be fully committed to the success of this project, working
directly with and as an extension of city staff. The following tasks will be completed as part of our scope
of work:
114
Proposal for Professional Engineering Services
January 21, 2022
H:\CHAN\0T4124623\0_Crimson Bay Road LPP\City of Chanhassen 2021 Crimson Bay LPP Proposal - Revised.docx
Task 1 – Public Communication
A focused neighborhood meeting to discuss the selected alternative as well as gather property
specific information from each adjacent property is proposed to be completed.
Public open house informational meeting for the entire project area
Task 2 - Topographic Survey
Complete topographic survey of roadway from Highway 5 to 78th Street.
Obtain Gopher State One-Call utility locates
Complete structure inventories within the project area
Draft existing conditions drawing utilizing topo survey, City record drawings and GIS
information.
Establish rights-of-way and easement areas
Task 3 – Preliminary Design
Project Management
Kick-off meeting with City staff
Develop project schedule
Develop preliminary layout including horizontal and vertical alignment
Develop preliminary stormwater management plan
Develop preliminary utility plan and layout.
Identify easement needs. Assist in easement acquisition as necessary.
Develop and refine Highway 5 access closure plan with MnDOT
Prepare feasibility study, meeting Chapter 429 requirements, including preliminary assessment
roll
Wetland delineation and reporting
Prepare preliminary cost estimate
Task 4 – Final Design
Project Management
Preparation of Construction plans and specifications
Identify private utility conflicts & conduct pre-design utility coordination meeting
Provide 60% & 90% plans for City review
Provide 90% and final contract documents to MnDOT for review and approval
Obtain all necessary permits
Submit ad for bids and respond to bidders questions
Conduct on-line bid opening
Review bids and prepare award recommendation letter
Task 5 – Construction Management
Assist City with preconstruction meeting
Submittal review and project startup
Provide contract administration including weekly meeting attendance
Provide construction inspection / observation (assume 45hrs per week for 12 weeks)
Coordinate and provide construction staking
Prepare and coordinate final project documentation
Prepare & submit record drawings in electronic and hard copy format
Coordinate with Geotechnical materials testing
Expectations of City Staff:
115
Proposal for Professional Engineering Services
January 21, 2022
H:\CHAN\0T4124623\0_Crimson Bay Road LPP\City of Chanhassen 2021 Crimson Bay LPP Proposal - Revised.docx
Contract for geotechnical borings and materials testing
Public communications assistance
Presentations to the City Council for the assessment process
Easement negotiation assistance
Critical review of draft materials
Proposed Project Schedule
Below is our anticipated project schedule outline. This schedule may very depending on planned
Highway 5 work and coordination with those improvements. A detailed schedule will be completed
during preliminary design defining critical project milestones for MnDOT review, Chapter 429
assessment process and bidding timelines.
Neighborhood Meeting March, 2022
Preliminary Design March – May, 2022
ROW Acquisition Feb – Dec, 2022
Final Design June – Dec, 2022
Open Bids March, 2023
Construction June – Oct, 2023
Fee Estimate
Based on the scope of services described above, we propose a not-to-exceed fee of $270,334 to be billed
on an hourly basis. Our rates include labor, vehicle and personal expenses, mileage, routine expendable
supplies, and other normal and customary expenses associated with operating a professional business. A
detailed breakdown of our fees is attached.
Our Construction Management fees are dependent on contractor’s work schedule and hours. We have
assumed construction observation will require 45-hours per week (9 hours, 5-days per week) for twelve
weeks. We have included full time inspection; however, we will adjust our staffing as needed to maintain
the proper level of service and care. Should assumptions on working hours by the contractor or
construction duration be adjusted down, the city can expect our team to adjust staffing accordingly which
will result in cost reductions.
Thank you for allowing Bolton & Menk to submit this proposal for your consideration. Please contact
me at 612-756-4315 with any questions or comments. We truly appreciate the opportunity to work
with the City of Chanhassen and look forward to developing a successful project in your community.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
David Martini, PE
Principal Engineer
116
Detailed Fee Estimate
Revised -
Client: City of Chanhassen Bolton & Menk, Inc.Project: Crimson Bay Roadway Improvements
Task
No.Work Task Description Project ManagerPrincipal-in-ChargeDesign EngineerEngineeringTechnicianWater ResourcesEngineerSurvey CrewProjectCommunicationSpecialistLead InspectorTotals Costs
1.0 Public Communication
1.1 Neighborhood Meeting ---0 $0.00
1.2 Public Open House ----0 $0.00
Subtotal Hours - Task 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0.00
2.0 Design Survey
2.1 Topo Survey 2 30 32 $5,116.00
2.2 Gopher one-call utility locates 4 4 $512.00
2.3 Structure Inventories 1 6 7 $1,118.00
2.4 Existing Condition Drawing 16 16 $2,048.00
2.5 Establish Right-of-way 1 6 4 11 $1,566.00
Subtotal Hours - Task 2 4 0 0 26 0 40 0 0 70 $10,360.00
3.0 Preliminary Design
3.1 Project Management 20 2 22 $3,528.00
3.2 Kick-off Meeting 4 2 6 $1,000.00
3.3 Project Schedule 2 2 $316.00
3.4 Preliminary Layout 8 20 10 38 $5,344.00
3.5 Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan 16 16 $2,272.00
3.6 Preliminary Utility Plan 4 8 12 $1,752.00
3.7 Identify Easements & Assist W/ Easement Acquisition 10 2 8 20 $3,140.00
3.8 Develop Highway 5 Access Closure Plan W/ MnDOT 16 12 28 $4,064.00
3.9 Feasiblity Study 20 2 10 8 10 4 54 $7,844.00
3.10 Wetland Deliniation & Reporting 2 2 25 29 $4,122.00
3.11 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2 2 8 4 16 $2,372.00
Subtotal Hours - Task 3 88 8 48 32 55 8 4 0 243 $35,754.00
4.0 Final Design
4.1 Project Management 30 2 32 $5,108.00
4.2 Prepare Plans & Specifications 95 2 150 175 80 502 $70,138.00
4.3 QA / QC Plan Review 20 20 $3,160.00
4.4 Identify Private Utility Conflicts 1 4 5 $718.00
4.5 Provide 60% & 90% Plans for City Review 2 8 8 8 26 $3,596.00
4.6 Provide 90% & Final Contract Docs for MnDOT Review & Approval 10 15 15 15 55 $7,730.00
4.7 Obtain Permits 8 8 15 31 $4,514.00
4.8 Submit Ad for bids 2 2 4 $552.00
4.9 Conduct Bid opening 2 1 3 $434.00
4.10 Review Bids & Prepare Award Letter 2 1 3 $434.00
Subtotal Hours - Task 4 172 4 185 198 118 0 4 0 681 $96,384.00
5.0 Construction Management
5.1 Assist City with Precon Meeting 4 2 6 12 $1,816.00
5.2 Submittal Review & Project Startup 4 2 8 8 22 $3,208.00
5.3 Contract Administration (4hrs / wk July-Sep)48 48 $7,584.00
5.4 Coordinate & Provide Construction Staking 130 130 $20,800.00
5.5 Construction Inspection / Observation (45hrs / wk July - Sept)540 540 $73,440.00
5.6 Prepare Final Project Documentation 30 30 20 80 $11,660.00
5.7 Prepare & Submit Record Drawings 10 40 50 $6,520.00
5.8 Coordinate Geotechnical Materials Testing 4 16 20 $2,808.00
Subtotal Hours - Task 5 90 4 48 40 0 130 0 590 902 $127,836.00
Total Hours 354 16 281 296 173 178 8 590 1896
Average Hourly Rate $158.00 $184.00 $140.00 $128.00 $142.00 $160.00 $118.00 $136.00
Subtotal $55,932.00 $2,944.00 $39,340.00 $37,888.00 $24,566.00 $28,480.00 $944.00 $80,240.00
Total Fee $270,334.00
117
118
119
120
121
Capital Improvement Program
City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley
2022 2026
thru Department Street Improvements
Description
Project includes the extension of Crimson Bay Road northerly to tie into south terminus of Dogwood Road and eliminating the connection to TH5.
Project #ST-050
Priority n/a
Justification
This project is result of the preferred option to eliminate the existing Crimson Bay Road access from TH5 as part of the overall Arboretum Area
Transportation Plan (AATP). TH5 will be widened in the future to address capacity needs and eliminating minor roadway access points is part of
the overall corridor management strategy. The project needs to be completed prior to the relocation of the main Arboretum entrance and the
widening of TH5 planned for 2025.
Budget Impact/Other
Useful LifeProject Name Crimson Bay Road/Dogwood Road Connection Category Street Improvements
Type Improvement
Account #2
Account #1
Account #4
Account #3
Status Active
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Expenditures
1,500,0001,500,000Construction
1,500,000 1,500,000Total
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Funding Sources
700,000700,000Streets - Other Agency
Funding
120,000120,000Streets - PMP Assessments
180,000180,000Streets - PMP Funds
200,000200,000Utility Fund -Sewer
100,000100,000Utility Fund -Surface Wtr
200,000200,000Utility Fund -Water
1,500,000 1,500,000Total
122
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: February 14, 2022 RESOLUTION NO: 2022-XX
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTERING INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH BOLTON & MENK, INC. FOR DESIGN SERVICES RELATED TO
THE CRIMSON BAY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS,the City has a Pavement Management Program (PMP) that is supported by
the 5-yr Capital Improvement Plan (CIP); and
WHEREAS,part of the PMP and CIP is to perform annual improvements of various public
streets and related infrastructure; and
WHEREAS,the Crimson Bay Road intersection with TH5 is shown as a needed
improvement as part of the overall Arboretum Transportation Plan (AATP); and
WHEREAS,the Crimson Bay Road Improvement Project requires professional design
services; and
WHEREAS,the City utilized Bolton & Menk for previous work on grant funding for this
project and they also are the County’s consultant for the AATP; and
WHEREAS,the fee proposed fits with the requested scope and within the established
project budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby
authorizes entering into a Professional Services Agreement with Bolton & Menk, Inc. for design
services related to the Crimson Bay Road Improvement Project.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 14
th day of February, 2022.
ATTEST:
Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
123
chrisbrpdf-color.pltcfgbmi.tbl5/25/20217:05:27 AMH:\CACO\T44118370\CAD\MS\Prelim\dgn\Figures\East TH 5\TH 5 and Crimson Cul de sac Figure C.dgnExhibit
1 of 1
BITUMINOUS
CONCRETE
2020 CONSTRUCTION
LEGEND
Crimson Bay Road Access Reconfiguration
2021 MnDOT Local Partnership Program
City of Chanhassen, MN
EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
LANE INTO SHOULDER
RESTRIPE EXISTING RIGHT TURN
ACCESS CLOSURE
PARCEL LINE
RETAINING WALL
RAISED MEDIAN
TURN LANE WITH
REPLACE LEFT
120
SCALE IN FEET
CRIMSON BAY RD78T
H
S
T
TH 5POSSIBLE EMERGENCY VEHICLE
ACCESS
124
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Approve Agreement and Work Order for the Interim Traffic Signal at TH5 and
Minnewashta Parkway
File No.City Project No. 20-02 Item No: E.7
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves a maintenance agreement and work order for the interim
traffic signal system at TH5 and Minnewashta Parkway."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Operational Excellence
SUMMARY
MnDOT has granted the City's request to keep the temporary signal system in place until the TH5
expansion project reconstructs the intersection which will make the traffic signal permanent. A
maintenance agreement and work order are needed to be executed by the City to support this signal to
remain.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
The temporary signal system was installed as part of Phase 2 of the Minnewashta Parkway
Improvement Project. MnDOT only granted approval for a temporary signal and required that it be
removed upon project completion. That project was substantially complete in November of 2021.
125
Upon seeing how the signal operated and the public benefit of the signal being in place, a request was
made by numerous parties to MnDOT to reconsider the mandate to remove the signal, particularly
knowing that TH5 is planned to be widened and improved in this area, and a permanent signal is
planned for this same intersection.
MnDOT has agreed to partner with the City to allow the temporary signal to remain in place, but with
certain conditions of improving the signal to be in place for a longer period of time.
BUDGET
The costs to improve the signal to allow it to remain are as follows:
Item Responsibility Cost Source
Purchase of temp signal equipment from
Minnewashta Parkway contractor via contract
change order
City $7,500.00 Project 20-02
Purchase of MnDOT furnished materials to
improve the signal from Temporary to Interim
status
City $29,494.80 Project 20-02
Striping updates MnDOT Self
performed N/A
Signage updates City Self
performed
Street Operating
Budget
Driveway removal MnDOT Self
performed N/A
The Arboretum has graciously offered to help offset the City costs by contributing $12,500 toward the
improvement.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council adopt the Resolution.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution TH5 Minnewashta Pkwy Traffic Signal Agreement
Work Order
Agreement
Signal Plans
126
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: February 14, 2022 RESOLUTION NO: 2022-XX
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND WORK ORDER
WITH MNDOT FOR THE INTERIM TH5/MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY TRAFFIC
SIGNAL SYSTEM
WHEREAS,the City’s Minnewashta Parkway Improvement project (Project No. 20-02)
installed a temporary traffic signal at TH5 and Minnewashta Parkway; and
WHEREAS,the State has agreed to allow the temporary signal to remain in an interim
basis until the future TH5 Improvement project reconstructs the intersection; and
WHEREAS,there are additional improvements needed to be performed by the City and
State in order to keep the signal in place; and
WHEREAS, there are maintenance responsibilities required to be defined while the signal
system is in place during the interim period.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby
enters into MnDOT Agreement no. 1049110 and Work Order no. 1028123W01with the State of
Minnesota, Department of Transportation for operation and maintenance of the traffic control signal
system on Trunk Highway 5 at Minnewashta Parkway; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the
Agreement.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 14
th day of February, 2022.
ATTEST:
Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
127
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028123W01
Receivable Work Order – Lump Sum 1
Updated 02/11/2020
STATE OF MINNESOTA
WORK ORDER UNDER
MASTER PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT
State Project (SP) Number: 1002-124 and 194-111-002
Trunk Highway (TH) Number: 5
Project Description: State to furnish a video detection system, PTZ camera, and modem for interim traffic control signal
on TH 5 at Minnewashta Parkway.
This Work Order Contract is issued under the authority of the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) Master Partnership Contract No. 1028123 between the state of Minnesota acting through its Commissioner of
Transportation (“State”) and City of Chanhassen, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (“Local Government”)
and is subject to all applicable provisions and covenants of that Contract which are incorporated herein by reference.
Work Order Contract
1. Term of Work Order Contract; Incorporation of Exhibits
1.1. Effective date: This Work Order Contract will be effective on the date that all required signatures are
obtained by State, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 2. The Local Government
must not begin work under this Contract until ALL required signatures have been obtained and the Local
Government has been notified in writing to begin such work by the State’s Authorized Representative.
1.2. Expiration date: This Work Order Contract will expire on 06/30/2022, or when all obligations have been
satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first.
1.3. Exhibits: Exhibit A is attached and incorporated into this Work Order Contract.
2. Nature of Work
2.1. X the blanks below to indicate the nature of the work to be performed. See Article 3. Services Requiring
a Work Order Contract, of the Master Partnership Contract for applicable definitions.
[ ] Contract Administration
[ ] Emergency Services
[ ] Professional/Technical Services
[ X ] Roadway Maintenance
3. Scope of Work
3.1. The State will perform services under this Work Order summarized generally as follows: The State will
furnish a video detection system, PTZ camera and modem, (“State Furnished Materials”) according to
the Project Plans, to operate the interim traffic control signal system covered under this Work Order.
4. Items provided or completed by the Parties
4.1. The following will be provided or completed by the Local Government: Lump sum payment for State
Furnished Materials. Coordinate with contractor to pick up State Furnished Materials at MnDOT’s
Electrical Services Section office located at 6000 Minnehaha Avenue, St. Paul, MN.
4.2. The following will be provided or completed by MnDOT: State Furnished Materials as described in
Exhibit A.
5. Consideration of Payment
5.1. The Local Government will pay for all services performed by the State on a Lump Sum basis.
5.2. The Local Government’s obligation for all compensation and reimbursements to the State is $29,494.80.
6. Terms of Payment
128
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028123W01
2
6.1. The Local Government will pay the State upon execution of this work order.
6.2. Per Section 7.4 of the Master Partnership Contract;
6.2.1. The Local Government will pay the State as specified in this work order and will make prompt
payment in accordance with Minnesota law.
6.2.2. Payment by the Local Government.
i. The Local Government will make payment to the order of the Commissioner of
Transportation.
ii. IMPORTANT NOTE: Payment must reference the MnDOT Contract and Work Order Number
shown on the face page of this contract and the MnDOT Invoice Number shown on the
invoice.
iii. Remit payment to the address below:
MnDOT
Attn: Cash Accounting
RE: MnDOT Contract Number 1028123W01 and Invoice Number: #####
(see note above)
Mail Stop 215
395 John Ireland Blvd
St. Paul, MN 55155
7. Authorized Representatives
7.1. The State’s Project Manager, for this Work Order is:
Name/Title: Greg Kern, Metropolitan District Traffic Engineer, or successor
MnDOT - Metro District
Street Address: 1500 W County Road B-2
City State Zip: Roseville, MN 55113
Telephone: 651-234-7877
Email: gregory.kern@state.mn.us
7.2. The State’s Project Manager is responsible for overseeing the State’s fulfillment of its obligations under
this Work Order, reviewing, providing and approving invoices, resolving disputes related to this Work
Order, and for giving or receiving any notices required or permitted by this Work Order.
7.3. The Local Government’s Project Manager for this Work Order is:
Name/Title: Charles Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer, or successor
Name of Gov’t: City of Chanhassen
Street Address: 7700 Market Boulevard
City State Zip: Chanhassen, MN 55317
Telephone: 952-227-1169
Email: chowley@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
7.4. The Local Government’s Project Manager for this Work Order is responsible for overseeing the Local
Government’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Work Order, reviewing and approving invoices,
resolving disputes related to this Work Order, and for giving or receiving any notices required or
permitted by this Work Order.
8. Termination
8.1. Termination by the State or Local Government. The Local Government, the State or the Commissioner
of Administration may cancel this Work Order at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days’ written
notice to the other Party. Upon termination, the State will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro
rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed.
129
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028123W01
3
8.2. Termination for Insufficient Funding. If the State is the Local Government, The State may immediately
terminate this Work Order if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding
source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services
covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the Local Government. The State is not
obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination.
However, the Local Government will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services
satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any
penalty if the Work Order is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other
funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Local Government notice of the
lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State’s receiving that notice.
9. Additional Provisions
9.1. None
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
130
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028123W01
4
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
The Local Government certifies that the appropriate
person(s) have executed the contract on behalf of the
Local Government as required by applicable articles,
bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
Title: District Engineer or Assistant District Engineer
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
By:
Date:
131
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028123W01
5
EXHIBIT A – STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS
Item Quantity Cost per item Item Cost
Gridsmart video detection 1 $22,129.63 $22,129.63
PTZ Camera 1 $4,635.17 $4,635.17
Modem rental-Lump sum payment
for duration of interim traffic
control.
1 $2,730.00 $2,730.00
Total $29,494.80
[THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
132
MnDOT Contract No.: 1049110
-1-
2 Party Signal Reimbursable Maintenance (Cooperative Agreements)
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Control Section (C.S.): 1002
State Project Number (S.P.): 1002-124
State Aid Project Number (S.A.P.): 194-111-002
Trunk Highway Number (T.H.): 5
Signal System ID No.: 4021456
This Agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ("State") and
the City of Chanhassen acting through its City Council ("City").
Recitals
1. The City and the State wish to define their respective operation and maintenance responsibilities for the
existing , interim traffic control signal with signal pole mounted luminaires, Accessible Pedestrian Signals
("APS"), and signing ("Signal System"), and Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption System ("EVP System"), on Trunk
Highway No. 5 at Minnewashta Parkway; in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota; and
2. The City and State recognize the Signal System is in an interim state until the planned 2025 Carver County
led two-to-four lane expansion of Trunk Highway No. 5 through this intersection; and
3. The City's operation and major maintenance responsibilities covered under this Agreement will be
performed by the State on a reimbursable basis; and
4. Minnesota Statutes § 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make
arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing,
maintaining, and improving the trunk highway system.
Agreement
1. Term of Agreement; Survival of Terms
1.1. Effective Date. This Agreement will be effective on the date the State obtains all signatures required by
Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subdivision 2.
1.2. Expiration Date. This Agreement will expire when all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, replaced
by a subsequent agreement, or terminated by both parties.
1.3. Survival of Terms. All clauses which impose obligations continuing in their nature and which must survive
in order to give effect to their meaning will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement,
including, without limitation, the following clauses: 5. Liability; Worker Compensation Claims; Insurance; 8.
State Audits; 8. Government Data Practices; 9. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue; and 11. Force Majeure.
133
MnDOT Contract No.: 1049110
-2-
2 Party Signal Reimbursable Maintenance (Cooperative Agreements)
The terms and conditions set forth in Article 2. Signal System and EVP System Operation and Maintenance
may be amended by another agreement between the parties.
2. Signal System and EVP System Operation and Maintenance
Operation and maintenance responsibilities will be as follows for the existing Signal System and EVP System on
T.H. 5 at Minnewashta Parkway.
2.1. City Responsibilities.
A. Power. The City will be responsible for the hook-up cost and application to secure an adequate power
supply to the service pad or pole and will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to
operate the Signal System, EVP System, and Interconnect.
B. Minor Signal System Maintenance. The City will provide for the following, without cost to the State.
i. Maintain the signal pole mounted Light Emitting Diode ("LED") luminaires, including replacing the
luminaires when necessary. The LED luminaire must be replaced when it fails or when light levels
drop below recommended American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
("AASHTO") levels for the installation.
ii. Replace the Signal System LED indications. Replacing LED indications consists of replacing each LED
indication when it reaches end of life per the MnDOT Traffic Engineering Manual or fails or no
longer meets Institute of Traffic Engineers ("ITE") standards for light output.
iii. Clean the Signal System controller cabinet and service cabinet exteriors.
iv. Paint and maintain the pedestrian crosswalk markings on the Minnewashta Parkway approach at
the T.H. 5 intersection.
2.2. City Responsibilities Performed by the State on a Reimbursable Basis. Operation and maintenance
activities covered below are the responsibility of the City and will be performed by the State on a
reimbursable basis. The State will invoice the City for the actual costs incurred in performing said
operation and maintenance activities.
A. Interconnect; Timing; Other Maintenance. The State will maintain the Interconnect and signing, and
perform all other Signal System, APS, and signal pole luminaire circuit maintenance. All Signal System
timing will be determined by the State.
B. EVP System Operation. The EVP System will be installed, operated, maintained, and removed according
to the following conditions and requirements:
i. All maintenance of the EVP System will be done by State forces.
ii. Emitter units may be installed only on authorized emergency vehicles, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes § 169.011, Subdivision 3. Authorized emergency vehicles may use emitter units only when
responding to an emergency. The City will provide the State's District Engineer or their designated
representative a list of all vehicles with emitter units, if requested by the State.
iii. Malfunction of the EVP System must be reported to the State immediately.
iv. In the event the EVP System or its components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or
the conditions set forth in Paragraph ii. above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues
134
MnDOT Contract No.: 1049110
-3-
2 Party Signal Reimbursable Maintenance (Cooperative Agreements)
after the City receives written notice from the State, the State may remove the EVP System. Upon
removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, all of its parts and components become the
property of the State.
v. All timing of the EVP System will be determined by the State.
2.3. Termination of Operation and Maintenance Terms. Each party may terminate the operation and
maintenance terms covered in Section 2.2 by providing 30 days' notice to the other party. The City's
termination requires a resolution of the City Council and the State's termination requires a letter from the
State's District Engineer. Upon termination, the City will be responsible for removal of the signal system
unless the termination is based on a subsequent improvement project that installs a modified temporary
or permanent signal system.
2.4. Right-of-Way Access. Each party authorizes the other party to enter upon their respective public
right-of-way to perform the maintenance activities described in this Agreement.
3. Authorized Representatives
Each party's Authorized Representative is responsible for administering this Agreement and is authorized to give
and receive any notice or demand required or permitted by this Agreement.
3.1. The State's Authorized Representative will be:
Name, Title: Greg Kern, MnDOT Metropolitan District Traffic Engineering (or successor)
Address: 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113
Telephone: (651) 234-7877
E-Mail: gregory.kern@state.mn.us
3.2. The City's Authorized Representative will be:
Name, Title: Charles Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer (or successor)
Address: 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317
Telephone: (952) 227-1169
E-Mail: chowley@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
4. Assignment; Amendments; Waiver; Contract Complete
4.1. Assignment. No party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the
prior consent of the other party and a written assignment agreement, executed and approved by the same
parties who executed and approved this Agreement, or their successors in office.
4.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has
been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Agreement, or
their successors in office.
4.3. Waiver. If a party fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the
provision or the party's right to subsequently enforce it.
4.4. Contract Complete. This Agreement contains all prior negotiations and agreements between the State and
the City. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind
either party.
135
MnDOT Contract No.: 1049110
-4-
2 Party Signal Reimbursable Maintenance (Cooperative Agreements)
5. Liability; Worker Compensation Claims; Insurance
5.1. Each party is responsible for its own acts, omissions, and the results thereof to the extent authorized by
law and will not be responsible for the acts, omissions of others, and the results thereof. Minnesota
Statutes § 3.736 and other applicable law govern liability of the State. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and
other applicable law govern liability of the City.
5.2. Each party is responsible for its own employees for any claims arising under the Workers Compensation
Act.
6. Nondiscrimination
Provisions of Minnesota Statutes § 181.59 and of any applicable law relating to civil rights and discrimination are
considered part of this Agreement.
7. State Audits
Under Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subdivision 5, the City's books, records, documents, accounting procedures,
and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the State and the State Auditor or
Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this Agreement.
8. Government Data Practices
The City and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 13, as it applies to all data provided under this Agreement, and as it applies to all data created,
collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the City under this Agreement. The civil
remedies of Minnesota Statutes §13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the
City or the State.
9. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue
Minnesota law governs the validity, interpretation, and enforcement of this Agreement. Venue for all legal
proceedings arising out of this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with
competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota.
10. Termination by Mutual Agreement
This Agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement of the parties.
11. Force Majeure
No party will be responsible to the other for a failure to perform under this Agreement (or a delay in
performance), if such failure or delay is due to a force majeure event. A force majeure event is an event beyond
a party's reasonable control, including but not limited to, unusually severe weather, fire, floods, other acts of
God, labor disputes, acts of war or terrorism, or public health emergencies.
[The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank]
136
MnDOT Contract No.: 1049110
-5-
2 Party Signal Reimbursable Maintenance (Cooperative Agreements)
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
The undersigned certify that they have lawfully
executed this contract on behalf of the Governmental
Unit as required by applicable charter provisions,
resolutions, or ordinances.
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Approved:
By:
(District Engineer)
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
By:
(With Delegated Authority)
Date:
INCLUDE COPY OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION.
137
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION
WEST 77TH STREET TO MN HIGHWAY 7
REMOVAL PLAN
T.H. 5 & MINNEWASHTA PKWY 138
TEMPORARY SIGNAL
SYSTEM INPLACE.
SEE ATTACHED PLANS FOR
MODIFICATIONS.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION
WEST 77TH STREET TO MN HIGHWAY 7
CONSTRUCTION PLAN
T.H. 5 & MINNEWASHTA PKWY 139
RIGHT LANE
MUST
TURN RIGHT
RIGHT LANE
MUST
TURN RIGHT
i
Park Rapids 10
D etro t Lakes 2 9
ON PLAN SHEETS
L= SPACING LISTED
CHEVRON SIGNS
ORIENTATION OF
PC
PC
NOTES:
NORTH
INTERSTATE
35
PATH & FILENAME:OTST\Signing\Typicals\Standard Plans\5-297.701 DETAIL VERSION.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:5-297.701 DETAIL VERSION15-SEP-2020STANDARD SIGN PLACEMENT
LOCATIONS WITHOUT CURB
LOCATIONS WITH CURB NARROW LOCATIONS WITH CURB
PLACED SUCH THAT PANEL EDGE IS 1' FROM RIGHT OF WAY AND NEAR PANEL EDGE IS AT LEAST 2' FROM EDGE OF SHOULDER.
FROM SHOULDER. IF ADEQUATE RIGHT OF WAY IS NOT AVAILABLE TO PLACE SIGN AT REDUCED MINIMUM, SIGN SHALL BE
MINIMUM MAY BE REDUCED TO 6' FROM SHOULDER AND 12' FROM THRU LANE IF SITE CONDITIONS PROHIBIT A 12' OFFSET
IN ABSENCE OF CURB, TO THE NEAR EDGE OF THE THRU-LANE PAVEMENT. SEE SIGN TABULATIONS.
ALL SIGN MOUNTING HEIGHTS ARE MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN TO THE TOP OF THE CURB, OR
TO BE USED ONLY WHEN BOULEVARD IS TOO NARROW TO OBTAIN ADEQUATE CURBED LOCATION SIGN OFFSETS.
BUT NO MORE THAN TWO POSTS IN A SEVEN FOOT DIAMETER CIRCLE.
LIMITED TO, LIGHT POLES, TREES, SIGNS, AND BUILDINGS. SIGNS MAY BE PLACED CLOSER TO SIGNS IN TIGHT AREAS,
SIGNS MUST BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET FROM THE NEAREST OBSTACLE. OBSTACLES MAY INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT
SIGNS MUST BE PLACED SUCH THAT OBSTACLES DO NOT BLOCK THEM FROM BEING VIEWED BY THE APPROACHING TRAFFIC.
THE RAIL OF A RAILROAD TRACK.
SIGNS MUST NOT BE ERECTED OR CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO CAUSE ANY PORTION OF THE SIGN TO BE WITHIN 8.5 FEET OF
LATERAL CLEARANCES GIVEN APPLY TO RIGHT AND/OR LEFT SIDE INSTALLATION.
SIGN FACES MUST BE MOUNTED PLUMB.
CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES OR OBSTACLES, CONTACT THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
IF A SIGN NEEDS TO BE REPOSITIONED FROM THE PROPOSED PLAN LOCATION IN ORDER TO AVOID
TO AVOID SPECULAR GLARE, TURN SIGNS APPROXIMATELY THREE DEGREES AWAY FROM APPROACHING TRAFFIC.
TO THE DIRECTION OF, AND FACING, THE TRAFFIC THEY ARE INTENDED TO SERVE, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
SIGNS MUST BE PLACED AND ORIENTED APPROXIMATELY AS SHOWN IN THE PLAN, AT RIGHT ANGLES LL
12'
(MIN)
THRU
LANE
SHOULDER
3
2
4
2 4
2' (MIN)2' (MIN)
42
THRU
LANE
CURB & GUTTER
SIDEWALK OR TRAIL
1'
(MIN)
THRU
LANE
CURB & GUTTER SIDEWALK OR TRAIL
2'
(MIN)
1
42
3
2
1
4
PLAN FOR CRASH RESPONSE TYPE.
BREAKAWAY STRUCTURES AND AT LEAST 4 FEET FOR BENDABLE STRUCTURES. SEE SPECIFIC SQUARE TUBE BASE STRUCTURE
THE CRASHWORTHY HEIGHT FROM GROUND TO BOTTOM OF ANY PORTION OF THE SIGN PANEL IS AT LEAST 7 FEET FOR
SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(T.H. )PATH & FILENAME:OTST\Signing\Typicals\Standard Plans\5-297.701 DETAIL VERSION.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:5-297.701 DETAIL VERSION15-SEP-2020
STATE PROJ. NO.
140
PATH & FILENAME:OTST\Signing\Typicals\Standard Plans\DETAIL Versions\SQUARE TUBE SIGN MOUNTING DETAILS.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:SQUARE TUBE SIGN MOUNTING DETAIL1-JUL-2021
SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(T.H. )STATE PROJ. NO.
1 OF 3
SIGN MOUNTING DETAILS
SQUARE TUBE
(T=•" MIN, I.D.=…" MAX, O.D.=‡" MAX)
STAINLESS STEEL WASHER AND NYLON WASHER
1-1/2"
FOR SIGN PANELS ON TWO OR MORE POSTS
SIGN
PANEL
B
B
A
A
IF APPLICABLE
SPLICE PLATE
1-1/2"
MIN.
A
B
B
A
IF APPLICABLE
SPLICE PLATE
FOR SIGN PANELS 36" WIDE
OR GREATER ON ONE POST
FENDER WASHERS
ZINC COATED STEEL
TWO 1-1/4" X 0.065" THICK
ALUMINUM STRINGER
ALUMINUM STRINGER
ALUMINUM STRINGER
SQUARE TUBE
SQUARE TUBE
SQUARE TUBE
SQUARE TUBE
FOR SIGN PANELS UP TO 30" WIDE
12" MAX
13" MAX
SEE POST SPACING CHART
BOLT
BOLT
3"
MIN.
1-1/2"
(2 STRINGERS SHOWN)
STRINGER SPACING
36" MAX
STRINGER
ALUMINUM
NYLON INSERT LOCK-NUT
WITH ZINC COATED STEEL
5/16" STAINLESS STEEL BOLT
MAX, O.D.= 7/8 " MAX)
(T= 1/32 " MIN, I.D.= 3/8 "
AND NYLON WASHER
STAINLESS STEEL WASHER
ALUMINUM STRINGER
VIEW A-A
1-1/2"
VIEW B-B
CARRIAGE BOLT
CLAMP
ALUMINUM STRINGER
AND SERRATED FLANGE NUT.
WITH 3/8"-16X2" CARRIAGE BOLT
FINISHED STAINLESS STEEL
11GA TYPE 304, #2B
SQUARE TUBE
STRINGERS AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE THE STRINGER TO POST CLAMP.
IF POST SPACING REQUIRES PLACEMENT OF A POST WITHIN THIS AREA, EXTEND
12" TO 14"
13" MAX
12" MAX
AND SQUARE TUBE
CLAMP DETAIL
2. STRINGERS SHALL BE CENTERED ON SIGN PANEL.
INSERT LOCK-NUT
COATED STEEL NYLON
STEEL BOLT WITH ZINC
5/16" STAINLESS
(2 STRINGERS SHOWN)
STRINGER SPACING
36" MAX
MAX, O.D.= 7/8 " MAX)
(T= 1/32 " MIN, I.D.= 3/8 "
AND NYLON WASHER
STAINLESS STEEL WASHER
MAX, O.D.= 7/8 " MAX)
(T= 1/32 " MIN, I.D.= 3/8 "
AND NYLON WASHER
STAINLESS STEEL WASHER
ALUMINUM STRINGER
SQUARE TUBE
BACK TO BACK
ALUMINUM STRINGER
NYLON INSERT LOCK-NUT
ZINC COATED STEEL
STEEL BOLT WITH
5/16" STAINLESS
SIGN MOUNTING WITH STRINGERS
3"
1
1
1
1" TO 6"
1" TO 6"
MNDOT STANDARD SIGNS AND MARKINGS MANUAL FOR MOUNTING HOLES (PUNCH CODES) INFORMATION.
1. BOLT SIGN PANELS TO STRINGERS OR RISER POSTS AT NO GREATER THAN 24 INCH SPACING OR ACCORDING TO THE
NOTES:
CLAMP DETAIL
4" SQUARE TUBE
12" TO 14"
7/1/2021DATELIC. NO.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
CERTIFIED BYCHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: 141
SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(T.H. )STATE PROJ. NO.
2 OF 3
IS 2-3/16". IF RISER POST IS 2", INTERIOR POST IS 1-3/4".
FOR A TIGHT FIT. IF RISER POST IS 2-1/2", INTERIOR POST
INTERIOR POST STUD SHALL BE ONE SIZE SMALLER
IS BEHIND THE SIGN PANEL.
ABOVE GROUND. THE PREFERRED PLACEMENT LOCATION
WHEN USED MUST BE PLACED AT LEAST 8 FEET
NO MORE THAN ONE SPLICE PER POST.
6"
6"
SPLICE DETAIL
15
21
WIDTH
PANEL
SQUARE TUBE POST SPACING
POSTS
2
POSTS
3
POSTS
4
POSTS
5
POSTS
6
POSTS
7
POSTS
8
(IN)(IN)(IN)(IN)(IN)(IN)(IN)(IN)
42
48
54 30
60 36
66 36
72 42
78 42
84 48
90 48 42
96 48 42
102 54 42
108 54 42
114 60 42
120 60 48
126 66 48
132 66 48 42
138 72 48 42
144 72 48 42
150 78 54 42
156 78 54 42
162 84 54 42
168 84 60 48
174 90 60 48 42
180 90 60 48 42
186 96 66 48 42
192 96 66 48 42
198 102 66 54 42
204 102 72 54 42
210 108 72 54 42
216 108 72 54 48 42
222 114 78 60 48 42
228 114 78 60 48 42
234 120 78 60 48 42
240 120 84 60 48 42
246 84 66 54 42
252 84 66 54 42
258 90 66 54 42 42
264 90 66 54 48 42
270 90 72 54 48 42
276 96 72 60 48 42
282 96 72 60 48 42
288 96 72 60 48 42
294 102 78 60 54 42
300 102 78 60 54 42 42
306 102 78 66 54 42 42
312 108 78 66 54 48 42
318 108 84 66 54 48 42
324 108 84 66 54 48 42
330 114 84 66 60 48 42
336 114 84 72 60 48 42
DISTANCES ARE CENTER-TO-CENTER OF POSTS
STAINLESS STEEL WASHER
WASHER
STAINLESS STEEL
LOCK-NUT
NYLON INSERT
COATED STEEL
BOLT WITH ZINC
3/8" STAINLESS STEEL
7/1/2021DATELIC. NO.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
CERTIFIED BYCHECKED BY: DRAWN BY:
SIGN MOUNTING DETAILS
SQUARE TUBEPLOTTED/REVISED:1-JUL-2021 PLOT NAME:PATH & FILENAME:OTST\Signing\Typicals\Standard Plans\DETAIL Versions\SQUARE TUBE SIGN MOUNTING DETAILS.dgnSQUARE TUBE SIGN MOUNTING DETAIL 142
SHEET NO. OF SHEETS(T.H. )STATE PROJ. NO.
3 OF 3
SIGN MOUNTING DETAILS
SQUARE TUBE
NUMBER OF ALUMINUM STRINGERS FOR 2-1/2 INCH OR SMALLER POSTS
PANEL HEIGHT (INCHES)120 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4
114 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
108 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
102 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
96 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
90 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
84 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
78 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
72 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
66 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
60 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
54 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
48 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
42 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
36 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
30 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
24 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
18 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
12 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 102 108 114 120 126 132 138 144 150 156 162 168 174 180 186 192 198 204 210 216 222 228 234 240 246 252 258 264 270 276 282 288 294 300 306 312 318 324 330 336
1 POST 2 POST 3 POST 4 POST 5 POST 6 POST
PANEL WIDTH (INCHES)
NUMBER OF STRINGERS FOR 4 INCH POSTS
PANEL HEIGHT (INCHES)144 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7
138 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7
132 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 7 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7
126 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7
120 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7
114 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7
4 POST108 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7
102 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
96 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 8 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 6 6
90 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
84 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7
78 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7
72 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6
66 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6
60 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
54 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5
48 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
42 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
36 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
30 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
24 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
18 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
12 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 102 108 114 120 126 132 138 144 150 156 162 168 174 180 186 192 198 204 210 216 222 228 234 240 246 252 258 264 270 276 282 288 294 300 306 312 318 324 330 336
1 POST 2 POST 3 POST
PANEL WIDTH (INCHES)
7/1/2021DATELIC. NO.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
CERTIFIED BYCHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: PLOTTED/REVISED:1-JUL-2021 PLOT NAME:PATH & FILENAME:OTST\Signing\Typicals\Standard Plans\DETAIL Versions\SQUARE TUBE SIGN MOUNTING DETAILS.dgnSQUARE TUBE SIGN MOUNTING DETAIL 143
144
ABBREVIATIONS
YELLOW RIGHT ARROW
YELLOW LEFT ARROW
YELLOW INDICATION
WALK INDICATION
STATION
SPARE
SALVAGE AND INSTALL
RED LEFT TURN ARROW
REMOVE AND SALVAGE
RED INDICATION
PEDESTRIAN
PUSH BUTTON (PHASE 2, NO. 1)
PUSH BUTTON
PEDESTRIAN HEAD (PHASE 1, NO. 1)
NEUTRAL
LUMINAIRE
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE
JUNCTION BOX
INSULATED GROUND
INPLACE
INDICATION
HANDHOLE
GREEN THRU ARROW
GREEN RIGHT ARROW
GROUND ROD
GREEN INDICATION
GREEN LEFT ARROW
FLASHING YELLOW LEFT ARROW
FLASHING YELLOW ARROW
FLASH/FLASHING
FURNISH AND INSTALL
DON'T WALK
DEGREES
DETECTOR (PHASE 2, NO. 1)
COUNT DOWN
ADVANCE WARNING FLASHER
YRA
YLA
YEL
WLK
STA
SPR
S&I
RLA
R&S
RED
PED
PB2-1 (e.g.)
PB
P1-1 (e.g.)
NEU
LUM
LED
JB
INS. GR.
INP
IND
HH
GTA
GRA
GR. RD.
GRN
GLA
FYLA
FYA
FL
F&I
DWK
DEG
D2-1 (e.g.)
C.D.
AWF
LUMINAIRE NO.
SIGNAL BASE NO.
VIDEO DETECTION
EQ.G CONNECTION
SYMBOLS
EVP CONFIRMATORY LIGHT
EVP DETECTOR
EVP DETECTOR AND CONFIRMATORY LIGHT
BARREL MOUNT BASE NO.
WOOD POLE NO.
HANDHOLE
V
SIGNAL HEAD NO./FLASHER HEAD NO.
FOR PLANS AND UTILITIES SYMBOLS SEE TECHNICAL MANUAL
SPLICE
FIBER OPTIC SPLICE VAULT
TELEVISION CAMERA (CCTV)
PULL VAULTPV
F0
2
3
3-2
BM
4
WP
1
THE FOLLOWING STANDARD PLATES, APPROVED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, SHALL APPLY ON THIS PROJECT
PLATE NO.DESCRIPTION
PREFORMED RIGID PVC CONDUIT LOOP DETECTOR
SAW CUT LOOP DETECTORS
SHIM AND WASHER
POLE FOUNDATION (PA90 AND PA100)
POLE AND MAST ARM
PEDESTAL AND PEDESTAL BASE
8132
8130
8129
8126
8123
8122
STANDARD PLATES - SIGNAL SYSTEMS
B
E
A
L
G
F
STANDARD PLATES APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT
PLATE NO.DESCRIPTION
8121
8120
8119
8118
8117
8112
8111
8110
H
Q
C
D
G
I
E
E
TRANSFORMER BASE AND POLE BASE PLATE
POLE FOUNDATION (PA85)
GROUND MOUNTED CABINET FOUNDATION
SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND POLE
PRECAST CONCRETE HANDHOLE WITH VEHICLE LOAD
PEDESTAL FOUNDATION
TRAFFIC SIGNAL BRACKETING (PEDESTAL MOUNTED)
TRAFFIC SIGNAL BRACKETING (POLE MOUNTED)
160511045_sgl01
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN
SS06
SS01
ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, STANDARD PLATES CITY OF CHANHASSEN
MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION
WEST 77TH STREET TO MN HIGHWAY 7
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
PROJECT NO.
DRAWING NAME
MN LIC. NO.DATE:
LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO.
S.A.P.
S.A.P.
COUNTY PROJECT
CITY PROJECT
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
PHONE: 651-645-4197
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST, PAUL, MN 55114 194-111-002
2020-02
JOEL A. HINNENKAMP, PE
02/10/2020 53081
BWS
BWS
JAH
02/10/2020
16051104510:12:15 AM2/24/2020K:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\MINNEWASHTA PKWY\CAD\Plan Sheets\160511045_sgl01.dgnDISTRICT #:145
BASE OF POLE OR PEDESTALTO SIGNAL CABINET
ALL POLE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ARRANGED AS SPECIFIED ABOVE.
NOTE:
BLK OR BL
WH OR YEL
R OR O
BLK
WH
R
POWER
INPUT
G
WH
BLK
SERVICE
SIGNAL
WH
BLK
BLK/R
R
WH/R
BLK/R
BLK/WH
BLK
WH/BLK
BL/BLK
O/BLK
R/BLK
WH
BL
O
R
BLK
BLK/R
WH
BL
O
R
WH OR CLR
BLK
G
WH
BLK
BLK/R
R
BLK
BLK/R
WH
BL
O
R
WH
G
BLK
CABLE
(6SM)
G
WH
BLK
R
CABLE
COAXIAL
CONDUCTOR COLOR CODE (14 GAUGE)
TO DEVICE
GLA
YLA/FYA
NEU
GRN/GLA
YEL/YLA
RED/RLA
HEADS
SIGNAL
SECTION
4 AND 5
NEU
GRN/GLA/SPR
YEL/YLA/WLK
RED/RLA/DWK
HEADS
AND PED
3 SECTION
WH
G
BLK
WH
BLK
BLK/R
R
NEU
GRN
YEL
RED
ONLY)
HEADS
(CLUSTER
5 SECTION
WH
BLK
BLK/R
R
NEU
GLA
YLA
FYA
PART # W6S
SECONDARY LOCK PART
6-POSITION CONNECTOR
(BACK VIEW)
(FRONT VIEW)
PART # 0460-215-16141
PIN
PART # DT06-6S
6-POSITION PLUG
PART # DT04-6P
6-POSITION RECEPTACLE
61
2
3 4
5
6
5
4 3
2
1
6
5
4 3
2
1 1
2
3 4
5
6
PART # W6P
SECONDARY LOCK PART
PART # 0462-209-16141
SOCKET
6 Position DT Connector
pin #
Connector
Indication
Wire to Signal
1
2 YEL
Control Cabinet
Wire to
3 GRN
4 NEU
5
6 GLA
R
O
BL
WH
R
O
BL
WH
BLK/R
BLK
RED
Indication
Signal
Section Heads)
(4 and 5
YLA or FYLAO/BLK or BLK/R (6/C)
BL/BLK or BLK (6/C)
4-POSITION CONNECTOR
(BACK VIEW)
(FRONT VIEW)
PART # 0460-215-16141
PIN
1
23
4 4
32
1
4
32
1 1
23
4
PART # W4S
SECONDARY LOCK PART
PART # W4P
SECONDARY LOCK PART
PART # DT06-4S
4-POSITION PLUG
PART # DT04-4P
4-POSITION RECEPTACLE
PART # 0462-209-16141
SOCKET
4 Position DT Connector
pin #
Connector
Indication
Wire to Signal
1
2
3
4
Indication
Signal
WH or WH/BLK or WH/R
Control Cabinet
Wire to
O or O/BLK or BLK/WH or BLK
R or R/BLK or BLK
BLK/R
R
WH
YEL or WLK
NEU
(3 Section Head/DWK/WLK)
BL or BL/BLK or BLK/R or BLK BLK
RED or DWK
GRN or SPR
pin #
Connector
Indication
Wire to Signal
1
2
3
4
Indication
Signal
WH NEU
BLK
G
WH
BLK
G EQ.G
(Not Used)(Not Used)(Not Used) (See Note #8)
4 Position DT Connector
(Used with 3 Conductor Cable Only)
Control Cabinet
Wire to
pin #
Connector
Indication
Signal
4 Position DT Connectors
(Use Two Connectors for 5 Section FYA Cluster Heads)
to Control Cabinet
12 Conductor Wire
Signal Indication
4 Conductor to
1
2
3
4
R
BLK/R
R
WH NEU
BLK
O
BL
WH
RED
YEL
GRN
1
2
3
4
BLK/R
R
WH NEU
BLK
FYA
YLA
GLA
R/BLK
O/BLK
BL/BLK
WH/BLK
BL
O
R
WH
BLK
R/BLK
O/BLK
BL/BLK
BLK/WH
Red
Orange
Blue
White
Black
Red with Black Stripe
Orange with Black Stripe
Blue with Black Stripe
Black with White Stripe
WIRE COLOR CODE KEY
WH/BLK White with Black Stripe
WH/R White with Red Stripe
BLK/R Black with Red Stripe
CL Clear
BrownBRN
GreenG
WIRE SPECIFICATION CHART
Type Name
Number
Specification
1/C 6 INS.GR.
Loop Detector Lead-In Cable
3815.2C.6.b
1/C 2
1/C 6
2/C 14
3/C 14
4/C 14
6/C 14
12/C 14
6PR 19
3/C 20
Power Conductors
Power Conductors
Grounding Conductors
Signal Control Cable
Signal Control Cable
Signal Control Cable
Signal Control Cable
Telephone Cables Outdoor
EVP Detector Cable
3815.2B.1
3815.2B.1
3815.2B.5
3815.2C.4
3815.2C.3
3815.2C.3
3815.2C.3
3815.2C.3
3815.2C.5
DESIGNATION (AS INDICATED IN THE WIRING DIAGRAM) USING A PERMANENT BLACK MARKER.
9. LABEL EACH HALF OF THE CONNECTOR (PLUG AND RECEPTACLE) WITH THE DEVICE
(PART # 114017).
8. ANY UNUSED PIN MUST HAVE A SEALING PLUG PLACED IN BOTH THE PLUG & RECEPTACLE
7. WIRES MUST BE TERMINATED AS DETAILED IN TABLES DEPENDING ON WIRE COUNT.
NO OTHER CRIMPING TOOL WILL BE ALLOWED.
6. CRIMP PINS OR SOCKETS USING RATCHETING TYPE CRIMPING TOOL HDT-48-00.
5. STRIP .250 INCHES OF INSULATION FROM EACH INDIVIDUAL CONDUCTOR.
4. STRIP A MAXIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF THE OUTER JACKET OF EACH SIGNAL CABLE.
/JUNCTION BOX.
3. THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES OF SLACK ON EACH CABLE IN EVERY POLE BASE
CABINET TO THE BASE/JUNCTION BOX OF THE POLE.
2. DT06-_S PLUG SHALL BE TERMINATED TO THE CABLES RUNNING FROM THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
BASE/JUNCTION BOX OF THE POLE TO SIGNAL INDICATIONS.
1. DT04-P RECEPTACLE SHALL BE TERMINATED TO THE WIRING HARNESS RUNNING FROM THE
NOTES:
ENFORCEMENT LIGHT
VIDEO CAMERA
LUMINAIRE
EVP LIGHT/AWF
1/C 6
6PR 19
3-1/C 2
3-1/C 6
12/C 14
6/C 14
4/C 14
4/C 18
3/C 14
2/C 14
3/C 20
CABLE
6/C 14
CABLE
4/C 14
CABLE
4/C 14
CABLE
4/C 14
CABLE
3/C 14
or ENF LHT or AWF
EVP LHT or RED or YEL
ENF LHT)
(EVP LHT/AWF/
SS06
SS02
160511045_sgl02
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN
TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE
WIRING CONNECTOR DETAIL CITY OF CHANHASSEN
MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION
WEST 77TH STREET TO MN HIGHWAY 7
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
PROJECT NO.
DRAWING NAME
MN LIC. NO.DATE:
LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO.
S.A.P.
S.A.P.
COUNTY PROJECT
CITY PROJECT
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
PHONE: 651-645-4197
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST, PAUL, MN 55114 194-111-002
2020-02
JOEL A. HINNENKAMP, PE
02/10/2020 53081
BWS
BWS
JAH
02/10/2020
16051104510:12:15 AM2/24/2020K:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\MINNEWASHTA PKWY\CAD\Plan Sheets\160511045_sgl02.dgnDISTRICT #:146
APPROX.
10'APPROX. 5% SAG SIEMANS MARTIN GRADE GALVANIZED STRAND WIRE.
NOTE: ALL SPAN WIRES AND DOWN GUYS SHALL BE
17' MIN.
19' MAX.
OF POLE LENGTH)
(5' MIN OR 20%
TYPICAL WOOD POLE AND SPAN WIRE MOUNTED TRAFFIC SIGNALS
(NOT TO SCALE)
(NOT TO SCALE)
OVERHEAD SIGNAL BRACE DETAIL
(ABOVE ROADWAY)
20' MOUNTING HEIGHT
(NOT TO SCALE)
E.V.P. OR TRAFFIC DETECTOR WOOD POLE MOUNT
(NOT TO SCALE)
SIGNAL BRACE DETAIL
5 SECTION HEAD OVERHEAD
(AS REQUIRED)
NMC AND CABLES
MN/DOT APPROVED.
NOTE: TETHER CLAMP SHALL BE
(SUPPORT)
7/16" SPAN WIRE
(AS SHOWN IN PLAN)
SIGNAL CABLES
BACKGROUND SHIELD
CLAMP
(STABILIZER)
1/4" SPAN WIRE
WITH SIGNAL TETHER CLAMP
ATTACHED TO SIGNAL HEAD
(1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 1/4" X 1/4")
ALUMINUM ANGLE IRON
(AS REQUIRED)
WEATHERHEAD
NMC RISER AND
WOOD POLE
(SUPPORT)
7/16" SPAN WIRE
TRAFFIC DETECTION UNITS
LOCATIONS AND MOVEMENTS OF SIGNAL HEADS AND
UNITS. SEE TEMPORARY INTERSECTION LAYOUT FOR
MOUNTED SIGNAL HEADS AND TRAFFIC DETECTION
SIGNAL CABLE TO ALLOW MOVEMENT OF SPAN WIRE
FOR MULTIPLE TRAFFIC STAGES, COIL SUFFICIENT
(STABILIZER)
1/4" SPAN WIRE
MOUNTING HEIGHT)
(40' MINIMUM
AND MAST ARM
LUMINAIRE WITH PEC
REQUIREMENTS.
ADDITIONAL STRAPPING
SEE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR
18" MAX. BETWEEN STRAPS.
(SEE DETAIL)
IF APPLICABLE
E.V.P. SENSOR
NMC RISER AND WEATHERHEAD
(AS SHOWN IN PLAN)
SIGNAL HEADS
FLEXIBLE SEALTITE CONDUIT AND FITTINGS
REQUIRED)
(LENGTH AS
3/4" CONDUIT
BRACE DETAIL)
OVERHEAD SIGNAL
AS REQUIRED (SEE
ANGLE IRON BRACKETS
TURNBUCKLES AND
BREAKAWAY S-HOOKS,
ROADWAY SURFACE
IF APPLICABLE
E.V.P. LIGHT
(AS SHOWN IN PLAN)
SIGNAL CABLES
WOOD POLE
12" BETWEEN GUY AND SPAN SUPPORT
BE BONDED AND GROUNDED
CARRIER CABLE AND GUY WIRE MUST
GROUND WIRE AND CLAMPS
OF SIGNAL HEAD
NOT HIGHER THAN BOTTOM
(IF APPLICABLE)
JUNCTION BOX
NMC RISER AND WEATHERHEAD
(IF APPLICABLE)
3/4" NMC
(IF APPLICABLE)
PED PUSH BUTTON
ANCHOR
EXPANDING
GAURD AND
METAL GUY
GUY WITH
7/6" DOWN
APPROX. 55°
(SUPPORT)
7/16" SPAN WIRE
(AS SHOWN IN PLAN)
SIGNAL CABLES
SEE ALTERNATE 5 SECTION HEAD IF APPLICABLE
SIGNAL HEAD (AS SHOWN IN PLAN)
BACKGROUND SHIELD
S-HOOK 3/8" MIN. (BREAKAWAY)
TURNBUCKLE (5/16" MIN. EYE BOLTS)
CLAMP
(STABILIZER)
1/4" SPAN WIRE
STRAPS
STAINLESS STEEL
WITH SIGNAL TETHER CLAMP
ATTACHED TO SIGNAL HEAD
(1 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 1/4" X 1/4")
ALUMINUM ANGLE IRON
AND A WIRE ENTRANCE FITTING.
SUSPENSION CLAMP, A BALANCE ADJUSTER,
ASSEMBLY SHALL CONSIST OF A CABLE
THE ONE-WAY SPAN WIRE MOUNTING
WIRE ENTRANCE FITTING
TETHER CLAMP
ALUMINUM ANGLE IRON
BAND-IT POLE PLATE
E.V.P. DETECTOR
CONNECTION
WATERPROOF
(5/16" MIN. EYE BOLTS)
TURNBUCKLE
(BREAKAWAY)
S-HOOK 3/8" MIN.
SIGNAL HEAD (AS SHOWN IN PLAN)
SS03
160511045_sgl03
SS06
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN
TYPICAL WOOD POLE / SPAN WIRE
SIGNAL SYSTEM DETAIL
MOUNT (STATE PROVIDED)
VIDEO DETECTION CAMERA AND CITY OF CHANHASSEN
MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION
WEST 77TH STREET TO MN HIGHWAY 7
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
PROJECT NO.
DRAWING NAME
MN LIC. NO.DATE:
LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO.
S.A.P.
S.A.P.
COUNTY PROJECT
CITY PROJECT
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
PHONE: 651-645-4197
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST, PAUL, MN 55114 194-111-002
2020-02
JOEL A. HINNENKAMP, PE
02/10/2020 53081
BWS
BWS
JAH
02/10/2020
16051104510:12:16 AM2/24/2020K:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\MINNEWASHTA PKWY\CAD\Plan Sheets\160511045_sgl03.dgnDISTRICT #:147
UMH
790
UMH
40
SCALE IN FEET
V-1
VIDEO DETECTION
NUMBER
CAMERA
PHASE(S)
DETECTION
INDICATIONS AND PUSH BUTTONS
CONTROLLER PHASING, PEDESTRIAN
PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS SHALL BE LOCATED AS SHOWN ABOVE
SIGNAL HEAD CHART
FACE R Y G
5-1, 5-2
2-1, 2-2
6-1, 6-2
1
WP
2
WP
3
WP
4
WP
1
PED
2
PED
A
B
1
2
3
1
WP
2
WP
3
WP
4
WP
1
PED 2
PED
5
2
6
4
P6-1
PB6-1P6-2
PB6-2
2-1
2-2
POSTED 55 M.P.H.
T.H. 5 (ARBORETUM BLVD)
5-1
5-2
4-2 4-3
4-5
6-1
6-2
6 EVP
PHASE4 EVPPHASE2+5 EVP
PHASE POSTED 30 M.P.H.MINNEWASHTA PKWY9.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
A F&I:
INSTALL:
B
F&I:
INPLACE:
POSTED 55 M.P.H.
T.H. 5 (ARBORETUM BLVD)
1-1/4" SPAN WIRE
1-7/16" SPAN WIRE
2-4/C 14
1-1/4" SPAN WIRE
1-7/16" SPAN WIRE
1-2/C 14
2-4/C 14
1-7/16" SPAN WIRE
1-2/C 14
1-4/C 14
1-7/16" SPAN WIRE
SS04
SS06
TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM
INTERSECTION LAYOUT
160511045_sgl04
IN CHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY
T.H. 5 (ARBORETUM BLVD) AT MINNEWASHTA PKWY
SIGNAL SYSTEM OPERATION
- PHASES 2 AND 6 ON VEHICLE RECALL.
TIME OF DAY.
OPERATED AS A FLASHING YELLOW ARROW BY
- NORMAL OPERATION IS 4 PHASE, WITH PHASE 5
- THE SIGNAL SYSTEM FLASH MODE IS ALL RED.
3
1-CAT 5E VIDEO DET
2-3/C 20
1-2/C 14
2-3/C 14 (LUM)
2-3/C 14
5-4/C 14
1-7/16" SPAN WIRE
FYA
-FYA DENOTES FLASHING YELLOW ARROW
SHIELDS
POLYCARBONATE WITH BACKGROUND
-ALL SIGNAL HEADS SHALL BE BLACK
12" LED
-ALL SIGNAL INDICATIONS SHALL BE
2, 4, 5, 6
3-1/C 6
2" CONDUIT
CONTROLLER CABINET TO HH 3:
1-1/C 6 INS. GR.
1-3/C 20
1-2/C 14
1-3/C 14
6-4/C 14
2-6/C 14
3" CONDUIT
CONTROLLER CABINET TO HH 1:
(STATE FURNISHED)
TEMP CABINET WITH CONTROLLER AND CELL MODEM
TEMPORARY SIGNAL CABINET BASE
11.
12.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1-1/C 6 INS. GR.
1-CAT 5E VIDEO DET
2-3/C 20
1-2/C 14
2-3/C 14
5-4/C 14
3" CONDUIT
*
*
*
10.
SYSTEM ID: 4021456 T.E. 22533
12
4-4
4-1
SYSTEM IS INPLACE.
WHILE TEMPORARY SIGNAL
FOR CLOSURE OF ENTRANCE
SEE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS
1-3/C 14 (LUM)
4-4/C 14
1-1/4" SPAN WIRE
1-7/16" SPAN WIRE
1-3/C 14 (LUM)
5-4/C 14
1-6/C 14
1-1/4" SPAN WIRE
1-7/16" SPAN WIRE
1-3/C 20
1-3/C 14 (LUM)
1-3/C 14
1-4/C 14
1-1/4" SPAN WIRE
1-7/16" SPAN WIRE
1-3/C 20
1-3/C 14 (LUM)
1-3/C 14
2-4/C 14
1-1/4" SPAN WIRE
1-7/16" SPAN WIRE
4-1
4-2, 4-3
4-4, 4-5
LUMP SUM
TRAFFIC CONTROL
INCLUDED IN
(WHITE, 30 LIN FT)
PREFORM TAPE
24" SOLID LINE
13.
SIGHT DISTANCES. PAID FOR AS CLEARING, ACRE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TREES AND VEGETATION AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TO IMPROVE
TEMPORARY SIGNAL SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE END OF PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION (LATE 2021).
TEMPORARY SIGNAL SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL PHASE 2 COMMENCES IN 2021.
ITEMS DENOTED WITH AN * ARE INCLUDED IN PAYMENT FOR THE EVP SYSTEM PAY ITEM.
CONDUIT SIZES ARE NOMINAL DIAMETER.
ALL WIRES LISTED ARE AWG (AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE).
INSULATED GROUNDING CONDUCTOR AS SHOWN IN PLAN.
ALL NEW CONDUIT SHALL BE PVC - SCHEDULE 80 OR HDPE SCHEDULE 80 AND CARRY 1-1/C 6
SEE DETAIL SHEET FOR WOOD POLE AND SPAN WIRE MOUNTING DETAILS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY INPLACE UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE CONNECTION OF THE POWER FOR THE
CABINET BASE ARE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY MNDOT OFFICE PERSONNEL.
ENSURE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE HANDHOLES, POLES, LOOP DETECTORS AND TEMPORARY
VEHICLE HEADS, AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION (EVP).
SEE THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS, COUNT DOWN PEDESTRIAN HEADS,
CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC OR SCHEDULE 80 HDPE.
NOTES:
3-3/C 14 (LUM)
2" CONDUIT
FROM HH 2 TO ABOVE SPAN WIRE ON POLE 1:
3-3/C 14 (LUM)
2" CONDUIT FROM HH 3 TO HH 2:
3-1/C 6
2" CONDUIT FROM HH 3 TO CONTROLLER CABINET:
3-3/C 14 (LUM)
3-1/C 6
1-1/C 8 GR.
3-1/C 8
1.5" NMC FROM LIGHTING CABINET TO HH 3:
LIGHTING CABINET (CITY OF CHANHASSEN)
VIA CONTROLLER
NOTE: ALL DETECTOR FUNCTIONS
(WHITE, 25 LIN FT)
PREFORM TAPE
24" SOLID LINE
(WHITE, 25 LIN FT)
PREFORM TAPE
24" SOLID LINE
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION
WEST 77TH STREET TO MN HIGHWAY 7
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
PROJECT NO.
DRAWING NAME
MN LIC. NO.DATE:
LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO.
S.A.P.
S.A.P.
COUNTY PROJECT
CITY PROJECT
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
PHONE: 651-645-4197
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST, PAUL, MN 55114 194-111-002
2020-02
JOEL A. HINNENKAMP, PE
02/10/2020 53081
BWS
BWS
JAH
02/10/2020
16051104510:12:17 AM2/24/2020K:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\MINNEWASHTA PKWY\CAD\Plan Sheets\160511045_sgl04.dgnDISTRICT #:V-
1 HERE ONREDSTOP1-CAT 5E TRA MGMT CAM
TV
148
1
WP
2
WP
3
WP
4
WP
1
PED
2
PED
SS06
SS05
TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM
INTERSECTION NOTES
160511045_sgl05
IN CHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY
T.H. 5 (ARBORETUM BLVD) AT MINNEWASHTA PKWY
1-3/C 20
1-3/C 14
1-6/C 14
3" CONDUIT ABOVE JUNCTION BOX TO SPAN WIRES WITH:
1-1/C 6 INS. GR.
1-3/C 20
1-2/C 14
1-3/C 14
6-4/C 14
2-6/C 14
3" CONDUIT RISER AND WEATHERHEAD FROM HH 1 TO SPAN WIRES WITH:
METAL JUNCTION BOX WITH TERMINAL BLOCK
1-R9-3 SIGN FACING SOUTH
CONFIRMATORY LIGHT (PHASE 6) POLE MOUNTED
1-ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND
1-TYPE 10A-WOOD POLE MOUNTED AT 90°
2-DOWN GUYS, GUARDS AND ANCHORS
45' WOOD POLE
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
1-1/C 6 INS. GR.
1-CAT 5E VIDEO DET
1-3/C 20
1-2/C 14
2-3/C 14
5-4/C 14
*
*
1-2/C 14
2-4/C 14
AND APS PB MOUNTING SPACERS
1-APS PB AND SIGN (RT ARROW) (PB6-2)
1-STRAIGHT MOUNT C.D. PED HEAD
1-STRAIGHT MOUNT SIGNAL
16' ALUMINUM POST ON TEMPORARY FOUNDATION
1-2/C 14
1-4/C 14
AND APS PB MOUNTING SPACERS
1-APS PB AND SIGN (LT ARROW) (PB6-1)
1-STRAIGHT MOUNT C.D. PED HEAD
16' ALUMINUM POST ON TEMPORARY FOUNDATION
1-3/C 14 (LUM)
1" CONDUIT RISER AND WEATHERHEAD ABOVE SPAN WIRE WITH:
2-4/C 14
3" CONDUIT ABOVE JUNCTION BOX TO SPAN WIRES WITH:
METAL JUNCTION BOX WITH TERMINAL BLOCK
1-R9-3 SIGN FACING NORTH
15' MAST ARM AND LUMINAIRE-LED (FOR 40' MOUNTING HEIGHT)
2-TYPE 10A-WOOD POLE MOUNTED AT 90° & 180°
2-DOWN GUYS, GUARDS AND ANCHORS
45' WOOD POLE
1-3/C 14 (LUM)
1" CONDUIT RISER AND WEATHERHEAD ABOVE SPAN WIRE WITH:
1-3/C 20
1-3/C 14
1-4/C 14
3" CONDUIT ABOVE JUNCTION BOX TO SPAN WIRES WITH:
METAL JUNCTION BOX WITH TERMINAL BLOCK
1-R9-3 SIGN FACING NORTH
15' MAST ARM AND LUMINAIRE-LED (FOR 40' MOUNTING HEIGHT)
CONFIRMATORY LIGHT (PHASES 2+5) POLE MOUNTED
1-ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND
1-TYPE 10A-WOOD POLE MOUNTED AT 180°
2-DOWN GUYS, GUARDS AND ANCHORS
45' WOOD POLE
1-3/C 14 (LUM)
1" CONDUIT RISER AND WEATHERHEAD ABOVE SPAN WIRE WITH:
1-CAT 5E VIDEO DET
1-3/C 20
1-3/C 14
1-4/C 14
3" CONDUIT ABOVE JUNCTION BOX TO SPAN WIRES WITH:
METAL JUNCTION BOX WITH TERMINAL BLOCK
1-R9-3 SIGN FACING SOUTH
15' MAST ARM AND LUMINAIRE-LED (FOR 40' MOUNTING HEIGHT)
CONFIRMATORY LIGHT (PHASE 4) POLE MOUNTED
1-ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND
1-TYPE 10A-WOOD POLE MOUNTED AT 180°
ON WOOD POLE (STATE FURNISHED)
1-VIDEO DETECTION CAMERA (V-1) WITH MOUNT MOUNTED
2-DOWN GUYS, GUARDS AND ANCHORS
45' WOOD POLE CITY OF CHANHASSEN
MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION
WEST 77TH STREET TO MN HIGHWAY 7
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
PROJECT NO.
DRAWING NAME
MN LIC. NO.DATE:
LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO.
S.A.P.
S.A.P.
COUNTY PROJECT
CITY PROJECT
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
PHONE: 651-645-4197
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST, PAUL, MN 55114 194-111-002
2020-02
JOEL A. HINNENKAMP, PE
02/10/2020 53081
BWS
BWS
JAH
02/10/2020
16051104510:12:18 AM2/24/2020K:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\MINNEWASHTA PKWY\CAD\Plan Sheets\160511045_sgl05.dgnDISTRICT #:1-TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CAMERA (C_____) WITH MOUNT
MOUNTED ON WOOD POLE (STATE FURNISHED)
1-CAT 5E TRA MGMT CAM
149
1
WP
J.B. 1
HH 2
SERVICE
LIGHT
STREET
SERVICE
SIGNAL
S.O.P.
ROD
GROUND
1 - CABLE 3 3 - CABLE 5
2 - CABLE 4 4 - CABLE 6
LUMINAIRES
2
HH 3
2
CONTROLLER CABINET
HH 1
2
PED
8
DETECTOR
6 EVP
TO EVP
HUB
9
EVP LIGHT
6
7-9
10, 11
2-2
13
2
WP
J.B. 2
4-5
2-1
14
1518#6 INS. GR.3
WP
J.B. 3
4
WP
J.B. 4
28
DETECTOR
2+5 EVP
TO EVP
HUB
29
EVP LIGHT
2+5
4-2
6-2
20
DETECTOR
4 EVP
TO EVP
HUB
21
EVP LIGHT
4
6-1
1
PED
22-24
19
23
P6-2
24
PB6-2
TO PB
26
27
27-2919-21
30
#6 INS. GR.
14, 15
2-2
10
P6-1
11
PB6-1
TO PB
19-30 19-30
7-18 7-18
DETECTOR
8
EVP
6
9
NEU
SPR
EVP LIGHT 6
P6-1
10
NEU
WLK
DWK
SPR
11
PB6-1
13
NEU
RED
GRN
YEL
15
NEU
RED
GRN
YEL
4-5
2-1
4-4
18
INS. GR.
21
NEU
SPR
EVP LIGHT 4
P6-2
23
NEU
WLK
DWK
SPR
24
PB6-2
19
NEU
RED
GRN
YEL 6-1
26
NEU
RED
GRN
YEL6-2
4-2
DETECTOR
28
EVP
2+5
29
NEU
SPR
EVP LIGHT 2+5
30
INS. GR.
INS. GR.
3-1/C 6
SERVICE
SIGNAL 2
SS06
SS06
TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM
FIELD WIRING DIAGRAM
160511045_sgl06
IN CHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY
T.H. 5 (ARBORETUM BLVD) AT MINNEWASHTA PKWY
5-2
7
5-2
7
NEU
GLA
YLA
RLA
FYA
SPR
5-1
12
NEU
GLA
YLA
RLA
FYA
SPR
25
CAT-5E
VIDEO DET
V-1
DETECTOR
20
EVP
4
5-1
25
CAT-5E
V-1 VIDEO DET
12
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
PAYMENT FOR THE EVP SYSTEM PAY ITEM.
2. ITEMS DENOTED WITH AN * ARE INCLUDED IN
1. LUMINAIRES ARE METERED.
NOTES:
3-5
3-5
INPLACE CITY CABINET
3-5
3, 12-17 3, 14-17
3
LUMINAIRE
1
4-4
16
4-3
17
16, 17
4, 5, 19-29
4-1
22
5
LUMINAIRE
3
4, 26-29 4, 27-29
4
LUMINAIRE
2
14
NEU
RLA
GLA
YLA
16
NEU
RLA
GLA
YLA
4-317
NEU
RED
GRA
YRA
22
NEU
RED
GRN
YEL 4-1
27
NEU
RED
GRA
YRA
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION
WEST 77TH STREET TO MN HIGHWAY 7
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
PROJECT NO.
DRAWING NAME
MN LIC. NO.DATE:
LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO.
S.A.P.
S.A.P.
COUNTY PROJECT
CITY PROJECT
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
PHONE: 651-645-4197
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST, PAUL, MN 55114 194-111-002
2020-02
JOEL A. HINNENKAMP, PE
02/10/2020 53081
BWS
BWS
JAH
02/10/2020
16051104510:12:19 AM2/24/2020K:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\MINNEWASHTA PKWY\CAD\Plan Sheets\160511045_sgl06.dgnDISTRICT #:TRA MGMT CAM
CAT-5E 90
TRA MGMT CAM
CAT-5E
90
150
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Resolution 2022-XX: Supporting Housing and Local Decision-Making
Authority
File No.Item No: E.8
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution supporting housing and local decision-making
authority."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Development & Redevelopment
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
The League of Minnesota Cities has a model resolution supporting the authority of local elected
officials and city staff to make land use decisions in their community.
Housing industry groups have recently attacked city land use tools such as zoning and planned use
developments. They claim incorrectly that these basic regulatory functions are prohibiting the building
of more affordable housing stock, when market factors such as labor costs, land, and materials are
creating the market failures we see today.
The resolution reflects the City's Legislative Priority #2, which states:
151
The City believes strongly that development should pay for development, and costs for those services
should not be passed on to existing residents through increased property taxes. The City of Chanhassen
supports fees and regulations necessary for new development to pay for itself. The City of Chanhassen
disagrees with the recent Housing First (BATC) publications, which state that city building fees cause
housing in Chanhassen to not be affordable. Based on city calculations, the fees charged for a new home
in Chanhassen, including all development and building fees, are less than 5% of the total cost of the
average new home in Chanhassen, but provide return on investment for those homeowners through
inspections, infrastructure, and amenities. Local governments must ensure new developments meet
established standards for the safety of future residents, and building permits play an essential role in
advancing these oversight responsibilities.
If adopted, this resolution will be shared with legislators, the League of Minnesota Cities, and the
Municipal Legislative Commission.
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution supporting housing and local decision making authority
152
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: February 14, 2022 RESOLUTION NO: 2022-XX
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING HOUSING AND LOCAL DECISION-MAKING
AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, local elected decision-makers are in the best position to determine the
health, safety, and welfare regulations that best serve the unique needs of their constituents; and
WHEREAS, zoning regulation is an important planning tool that benefits communities
economically and socially, improves health and wellness, and helps conserve the environment; and
WHEREAS, local zoning regulation allows communities to plan for the use of land
transparently, involving residents through public engagement; and
WHEREAS, cities across the state are keenly aware of the distinct housing challenges facing
their communities and they target those local housing challenges with available tools; and
WHEREAS,multiple bills restricting local decision-making related to housing have been
introduced in the 2021-2022 biennium.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby
supports local decision-making authority and opposes legislation that restricts the ability for local
elected officials to respond to the needs of their communities.
LET IT ALSO BE RESOLVED that this Council supports housing policy that advances
solutions to support full housing spectrum solutions, local innovation, incentives instead of
mandates, and community-specific solutions throughout Minnesota.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the Chanhassen City Council this14th day ofFebruary,2022.
ATTEST:
Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
153
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item
Resolution 2022-XX: Conduct Improvement Hearing and Authorize
Preparation of Plans and Specifications for 2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation
Project No. 22-01
File No.22-01 Item No: G.1
Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS
Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer
Reviewed By Charlie Howley
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution ordering the improvements and authorizes
preparation of plans and specifications for the 2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 22-
01."
Motion Type 4/5 Vote
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
Host the first Public Hearing for the project, known as the 'improvement hearing', associated with the
M.S. 429 special assessment process in order to review the findings of the feasibility study and discuss
specific aspects of the project. Follow up the Public Hearing portion of the agenda item with a decision
regarding ordering production of plans and specifications for the project.
BACKGROUND
As part of the overall Pavement Management Program (PMP), the City annually plans to rehabilitate a
section or sections of public streets across the City. The Five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
identifies the near-term streets to be rehabilitated.
154
Key dates and items relative to the project:
On May 17, 2021, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for
geotechnical services for the project.
On July 12, 2021, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates for
geotechnical exploration and engineering services in preparation for the design contract.
On September 29, 2021, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for
design and construction services for the project.
On October 25, 2021, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Bolton & Menk for
design and construction services for the project.
On December 15, 2021, the Engineering Department hosted an open house relative to the project
areas.
On January 24, 2022, the City Council accepted the feasibility study and called for a Public
Hearing to be held on February 14, 2022.
DISCUSSION
Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project
limits as shown in the attached 5-year CIP map. None of these neighborhood areas have had major
rehabilitation performed after the original urbanized street construction. Only minor maintenance
activities such as pothole patching, crack sealing, and seal coating have been performed.
The three neighborhood areas are listed below:
Longacres neighborhood (most streets in the area excluding Longacres Drive itself - which is
scheduled to be rehabilitated in 2025)
Brinker neighborhood
Stone Creek neighborhood
An RFP for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the
Engineering Department for the project areas. WSB & Associates was hired to perform the work and
prepare the report for these project areas. The geotechnical assessment and pavement evaluation was
conducted to aid in the analysis of proper roadway pavement rehabilitation designs for the project.
Bolton & Menk was provided the geotechnical report in addition to our asset management data for the
neighborhood areas in the project scope to incorporate with the feasibility study and subsequent design.
Based on the geotechnical report and the feasibility study, all of the neighborhood areas should be
rehabilitated by a full depth reclamation (FDR) technique. This is primarily based on the existing
Overall Condition Index (OCI), existing pavement condition, and the supporting soils. There are three
short sections of street in the project areas that require full pavement reconstruction. These areas are
located at the east end of Stone Creek Drive, the intersection of Brinker Street and Crocus Court, and
the east end of Hunter Drive.
As with any road rehabilitation project, minor spot repair of curb and gutter and maintenance associated
with public utilities are planned.
Sidewalks within the project areas will also be maintained. This scope will include diamond grinding
misaligned joints that have heaved primarily due to freeze-thaw and replacement of significantly
damaged sidewalk panels. Existing pedestrian ramps impacted by the project will be designed to be
brought into ADA compliance in accordance with the City's ADA transition plan.
155
City staff performed a condition assessment on the existing utilities within the neighborhoods. The
storm sewer pipe network was televised and the storm structures were evaluated to access the need for
improvements. All identified needs will be incorporated into the project. There will be minor re-grading
incorporated into the project relative to the emergency overflow for stormwater pond BC-P4.2A which
is contained by Stone Creek Drive and Boulder Road in the Stone Creek neighborhood. Bolton & Menk
also plans to incorporate an alternate into the project documents to add work associated with
stormwater pond BC-P4.3 which is on the east end of the Stone Creek neighborhood. This alternate
work would include reshaping the pond to increase the dead storage and lower the normal water level
associated with the pond. These efforts would greatly improve the freeze-thaw effect this pond has on
the stormwater infrastructure that routes water to the pond. In addition, a number of comments from the
open house hosted on December 15, 2021 were also related to drainage concerns. As appropriate, these
concerns have been addressed in the design.
Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer mains are not necessary. The valves on the
watermain are planned to be rehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the existing valves. The age of
the original installation indicates the bolting is likely to be mild steel. The bolts will be replaced with
stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils found in Chanhassen. Minor repairs
primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitary sewer system.
Public Engagement Summary and Other Proposed Improvements
Engineering distributed a survey to the 417 accessible properties along the streets being rehabilitated by
the project. Of those surveys, 164 have been returned which is the highest return rate we are aware of
for this type of a mailing. The project also hosted an open house on December 15, 2021 at the
Chanhassen Recreation Center. There were 62 people in attendance at the open house and 25 comment
cards were completed. The majority of the comment cards were directed to the proposed street
connection between Stone Creek Court and Timberhill Drive which is identified as a need in the 2040
Comprehensive Plan. Property owners were in opposition to this connection and the proposed
connection has been removed from this project.
Another proposed work item identified in the RFP to be evaluated was the removal of 10 center islands
in cul-de-sacs within the Longacres neighborhood. The Longacres Homeowner's Association (HOA)
maintains these center islands. Engineering has reached out to the HOA to seek their input regarding
this proposed work. We haven't received a conclusive official response at the time of the drafting of this
agenda item but a response seems likely to be received in the near future. Engineering has received
some input directly regarding this proposed removal. The response has been mixed with some property
owners adamantly opposed to the removal of the center island and others indicating they should be
removed. At the open house the majority opinion favored removal but recently the majority of the input
has been for the center islands to remain in place. Public Works identified the proposed removal of the
center islands as an item to be evaluated for the following reasons: improved operation of the cul-de-
sac from a mobility and overall service perspective including emergency services and maintenance,
street parking, and the fact the center islands are an atypical installation that do not meet City standards.
Each of the center islands has a few trees in it and the City Arborist has noted the vast majority of these
trees are ash trees. These trees should be treated against Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) if the center islands
remain in place.
Engineering has also received 14 emails from different property owners since the formal letter went out
to the residents a couple of weeks ago identifying the preliminary assessment amount, and
approximately 6 phone calls.
156
Funding
Budget for the proposed work has been included in the CIP for the project to be constructed in 2022.
Funding for the project is proposed to come from the pavement management fund (PMP) including
special assessments to benefiting properties for the street improvement costs. The special assessments
will be managed per the City's Assessment Policy. City utility enterprise funding will be utilized to
cover the rehabilitation needs specific to each utility.
The preliminary special assessment amounts for the three neighborhood areas identified to be
completed are as follows:
Longacres area: $2,934.25
Brinker area: $2,259.76
Stone Creek area: $3,153.18
Schedule
Item Date
Approve Plans and Authorize Ad for Bids February 28, 2022
Bid Project March 2022
Call for Assessment Hearing April 11, 2022
Host Open House April 2022
Conduct Public 'Assessment' Hearing and Award Project May 9, 2022
Begin Construction Late May 2022
Substantial Completion October 2022
Final Completion Spring 2023
BUDGET
The overall project budget is shown in the table below. The proposed 2022 CIP is including an increase
to the PMP fund due to actual franchise fee revenue collected being higher than estimated. The utility
funds were slightly increased as well. A complete engineer's estimate was prepared with the study and is
included in the report. The street portion of the estimate is projected to be approximately 25% under
budget but the associated utility work for the watermain and stormwater infrastructure associated with
the project are slightly over budget. Overall, the project is projected to come in under budget. During
design, the utility efforts will be re-evaluated and engineered to bring them closer in line with the
budgeted amounts, or an increase in funding from the enterprise funds will be sought.
Fund Budget Estimate
PMP (Street)$4,000,000 $2,951,063
Surface Water $520,000 $686,510
Surface Water Alternate (Pond in Stone Creek area)$0 $110,615
Sanitary Sewer $235,000 $228,000
157
Water $470,000 $584,445
Total $5,225,000 $4,560,926
Fund Budget Estimate
RECOMMENDATION
From an engineering and financing perspective this project is feasible and cost effective. Staff
recommends the Council adopt a resolution ordering the improvements and authorizing production of
plans and specifications for City Project Number 22-01.
ATTACHMENTS
Streets 5-Year CIP - 2022-2026
2022-1-20_CP22-01_2022 Pavement Rehab Feasibility Study
Resolution - Ordering Improvements & Authorizing Preparation of P&S 22-01 - 2.14.22
CIP ST-012
158
#################################################
#
######################################################################
Lake
Virginia
Christmas
Lake
Lotus Lake
Brendan
Pond
Lake
Harrison
Kerber Pond
Lake Susan Rice Marsh
Lake
Lake Riley
Rice Lake
Lake St. Joe
Lake
Minnewashta
Lake Ann
Lake Lucy
ST15
ST18
ST14
ST17
ST61
Minnewashta
Regional Park
North Lotus
Lake Park
Meadow
Green Park
Lake Ann Park
Chanhassen
Pond
Park
Chanhassen
Nature
Preserve
Chanhassen
Recreation
Center
Lake Susan
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Preserve
Power
Hill Park
Fox
Woods
Preserve
Bandimere
Community
Park
Bluff Creek
Golf Course
Hesse Farm
Park Preserve
Lake
Susan
Preserve
Raguet Wildlife
Management Are
MN Valley
National
Wildlife Re
MN Landscape
Arboretum
Seminary Fen
Scientific &
Nat*
Bluff Creek
Preserve
Independent
School
District 11
Independent
School
District 112
Independent
School
District 276
Riley
Ridge Park
Lake Ann Park
Preserve
SA5SA5
SA7
SA7
SA41
SA101
SA5
SA41
)212
)212 PowersBlvdAudubonRdChanhassen RdArboretum Blvd
Pioneer TrlGalpinBlvdLyman BlvdHazeltineBlvd Mar
ketBlvdPowers BlvdGreatPlai
ns
Blv
d
Arboretum Blvd
Flying
C
l
o
u
d
D
r
ST101
ST101
GH117
GH117
Document Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\CIP\2022-2026\CIP_5Year_2022-2026.aprxDate Created: 9/29/2021
Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 3,000
Feet
0 0.5
Mile
5-Year CIP - Streets
(2022-2026)
City of Chanhassen
Legend
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2022 - Municipal State Aid (MSA)
2023 - Municipal State Aid (MSA)###
#
##2023 - County/State Project
######2024 - County/State Project
###
#
##2025 - County/State Project
159
Submitted by:
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318
P: 952-448-8838
F: 952-488-8805
City of Chanhassen, MN
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project
Feasibility Report
City Project No. 22-01
December 2021
160
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.Certification
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874 / C.P. 22-01
Certification
Feasibility Report
For
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project
City of Chanhassen
Carver County
City Project No. 22-01
BMI Project No. 0C1.125874
December 31, 2021
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I
am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
By:
Joshua Eckstein, P.E.
License No. 48224
Date:12/31/2021
161
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.Table of Contents
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01
Table of Contents
I.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................1
A.Background and Introduction........................................................................................................1
B.Proposed Improvements ...............................................................................................................1
C.Estimated Costs..............................................................................................................................2
II.BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................3
III.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................................................................................3
A.Street Improvements .....................................................................................................................3
B.Water System Improvements ........................................................................................................5
C.Stormwater Runoff Management System Improvements .............................................................6
D.Sanitary System Improvements .....................................................................................................9
IV.FINANCING & FUNDING .........................................................................................................................9
A.Financing ........................................................................................................................................9
B.Funding ........................................................................................................................................10
V.ASSESSMENTS ......................................................................................................................................13
VI.PROJECT SCHEDULE / NEXT STEPS .......................................................................................................14
Appendix
Appendix A: Figures
Appendix B: Preliminary Cost Estimates
Appendix C: Assessment Practice
162
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 1
I.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A.Background and Introduction.
As requested by the City of Chanhassen, Bolton & Menk, Inc. has evaluated the feasibility for
the proposed 2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project. The project includes rehabilitation of
city streets in the Brinker, Longacres, and Stone Creek neighborhoods. During rehabilitation of
these streets the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm drainage infrastructure will also be
repaired in spot locations to maintain their structural integrity and functionality.
B.Proposed Improvements
All improvements addressed within this report are feasible from a technical standpoint. This
study addresses issues with aging, substandard, or non-existent infrastructure including street
pavement, storm sewer, watermain, and sanitary sewer. The improvements recommended in
this report are necessary to provide safe and adequate infrastructure and represent cost effective
solutions for doing so.
1.Street Improvements
The proposed street improvements consist of a combination of full depth
reclamation (FDR) and full depth reconstruction on streets within the Brinker,
Longacres, and Stone Creek neighborhoods. Existing concrete curb and gutter will
be spot replaced as needed, the majority of existing curb is proposed to remain in
place. The selected areas of full depth reconstruction will include full pavement
section and curb replacement as well as the addition of draintile. All streets within
the project area will maintain their existing width, alignment, and profile elevations
to minimize impact to adjacent properties. Proposed street improvements include:
Stone Creek Neighborhood
o Stone Creek Drive (Galpin Blvd to Boulder Road)
o Boulder Road
o Stone Creek Road
o Stone Creek Lane West & East
o Stone Creek Court
Brinker Neighborhood
o Walnut Curve
o Windmill Drive
o Majestic Way
o Brinker Street
o Tulip Court
o Crocus Court
Long Acres Neighborhood
o Hillsdale Court
o Southern Court
163
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 2
o Gunflint Trial (Longacres Drive to Arrowhead Lane)
o Gunflint Court
o Moccasin Trail
o Bent Bow Trail
o Hunter Drive
o Lodgepole Point
o Northwood Court
o Fawn Hill Road (Fawn Hill Court to Longacres Drive)
o Red Fox Circle
o Fawn Hill Court
Existing sidewalks within the project area have been reviewed and select
replacement of cracked or broken panels and leveling of uneven areas are proposed
to be completed as part of the project. Additionally, in order to achieve compliance
with current ADA standards, replacement of all existing non-compliant pedestrian
ramps is proposed.
2.Water System Improvements
Proposed water system improvements include spot repairs to all system components
on an as needed basis. All gate valves in the project area will receive maintenance
or replacement to restore their functionality. There may be some other spot repairs
to watermain, curb stops, hydrants, and other infrastructure as the design process is
finalized.
3.Storm Sewer Improvements
Proposed drainage improvements include spot repairs to sewer and manholes as
necessary, installation of sump manholes directly upstream of outfalls to basins,
and installation of drain tile connections for sump pumps in targeted areas.
Improvements also include basin modification in the Stone Creek Neighborhood to
restore a surface overflow route and eliminate permanent flooding of street sewer.
No additional stormwater treatment will be required due to street improvements per
watershed or State requirements. However, modifications to the basin and adjacent
area on the east side of the Stone Creek Neighborhood will require approval of the
Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and the Twin Cities & Western
Railroad Company.
4.Sanitary Sewer Improvements
The existing sanitary sewer system will remain intact with spot repairs as needed.
Repairs to eliminate Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) issues will be completed on
various manholes within the project. All manholes in the project area will have
frames adjusted to the new pavement and new lids installed.
C.Estimated Costs
Cost estimates have been prepared for the proposed improvements. Itemized cost estimates are
provided in Appendix B and summarized below in Table 1.
164
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 3
Table 1: Estimated Project Costs
Proposed Improvements Total Estimated Project Cost
Brinker Area $750,583
Longacres Area $2,144,065
Stone Creek Area $1,666,278
Total Estimated Project Cost $4,560,926
II.BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
The impetus for this report is a request by the City of Chanhassen to evaluate the feasibility of planned
improvements to pavement and utilities for the 2022 project year. The City Council authorized Bolton
& Menk, Inc. to begin design services including preparation of a feasibility study on October 25, 2021.
The neighborhoods within the project area are 24 to 29 years old and only maintenance activities such
as minor sewer and watermain repairs, crack seals, chip seals and pothole patching have been
completed. Utility replacement, drainage basin excavation and pavement rehabilitation are potentially
expected maintenance needs at this point in the infrastructure’s life cycle. The goal of these
improvements is to renew and restore municipal infrastructure in the proposed neighborhoods with
proper and timely repairs and maintenance to avoid the need for more costly replacement techniques
in the future.
In an effort to gather input and engage impacted public, an open house was held on December 15,
2021. Approximately 60 people attended the meeting which was conducted at the Chanhassen
Recreation Center from 4:30 to 6:00 PM. Twenty-five comment cards were received and have been
included in the overall evaluation of improvements. In addition to the open house, a survey was sent
out to all impacted property owners asking specific questions about their property and offering an
opportunity to provide input or ask questions. Resident surveys will also be used to inform the design
process making it a more comprehensive evaluation.
This report is based on record drawings, aerial photography, City utility maps, topographical data,
televising data, geotechnical exploration report, staff inspection reports, feedback solicited from
property owners and City staff input. This report examines various potential infrastructure
components within the Longacres, Brinker and Stone Creek neighborhoods. More specifically, this
report reviews considerations for:
Bituminous Pavement Surfacing Needs
Water Supply System Needs
Stormwater Runoff Management System Needs
Wastewater System Facility Needs
Pedestrian Mobility Needs
III.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
A.Street Improvements
Figures 1 to 4 in Appendix A indicate the proposed street improvements. Figure 5 in Appendix
165
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 4
A indicates the proposed typical street sections.
Street improvements are planned in three separate neighborhoods:
Brinker Neighborhood, approximately 0.92 miles of street originally constructed
around 1993
Longacres Neighborhood, approximately 2.03 miles of street originally constructed
between 1992 and 1997
Stone Creek Neighborhood, approximately 1.50 miles of street originally constructed
between 1992 and 1994
The condition of the existing pavement section was reviewed to evaluate and select the proper
rehabilitation technique. The 2020 pavement condition index ratings range from 22 to 73 with
the majority of the streets falling in the 30 to 40 range. The overall pavement condition is
identified to be below average to poor, with evident signs of wear, significant cracking, and
distress primarily due to the age of the pavement and frequent patching. The pavement can no
longer be efficiently overlaid due to the distress and extent of prior maintenance. Geotechnical
boring analysis indicates an average bituminous thickness of 5 inches over 12.5 inches of
aggregate base. Visual inspection of the roadway surfaces indicates uniform block cracking
throughout the project area. Based on the type and quantity of cracks along with the PCI ratings
and existing pavement section thickness, a majority of the proposed street improvements require
full depth reclamation (FDR) of the existing pavement and aggregate base. The resultant blended
recycled aggregate material is proposed to be used as the aggregate base for new bituminous
pavement. A few isolated areas have been identified to be in need of full depth reconstruction
due to rutting or settlement of the pavement from unstable high moisture content subgrade soil.
The full depth reconstruction method will include a section of sand that will improve drainage
to newly installed draintile and increase stability under the roadway pavement. The proposed
street widths will remain the same as existing since the curb and gutter will largely remain in
place except in the reconstruction areas. Existing street and a majority of adjacent driveway
grades will also remain the same for the same reason. The proposed residential street section
will include 4-inches of bituminous pavement over the recompacted, reclaimed aggregate base.
Draintile is proposed to be added behind the existing curb in some locations to provide an access
point for residential sump pump connections and to help drain any offsite groundwater before it
enters the street section.
The locations that are proposed for full depth reconstruction are the east end of Stone Creek
Drive, the intersection of Brinker Street and Crocus Court, and the east end of Hunter Drive.
The proposed full reconstruction method consists of complete removal of the existing street
structural section. A full new street section of select granular, aggregate base and pavement is
then installed with new concrete curb and gutter. Parts of adjacent driveways are also
reconstructed as necessary to match any new grades on the roadway. The proposed residential
street section will include 4-inches of bituminous pavement, 12-inches of aggregate base, 24-
inches of select granular borrow placed on compacted subgrade. This section matches the City
standard residential street section. Additional excavation will occur and be replaced with
stabilizing aggregate if poor subgrade soils are encountered. Draintile is proposed to be added
behind the new curb in all full reconstruct locations to provide proper subgrade drainage and an
access point for residential sump pump connections and to help drain any offsite groundwater
before it enters the street section.
Existing sidewalks within the three neighborhoods have been analyzed for any deficient
concrete or trip hazards that will be addressed by spot replacement of panels or diamond
grinding. The proposed reconstructed sidewalk section will include 6-inches of concrete and 4-
166
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 5
inches of aggregate base. Given the extreme complexity of both physical installation and gaining
property owner approval, no new sidewalk or extensions of existing sidewalks were identified
to be included in the project scope. Additionally, this project is considered rehabilitation and not
reconstruction, therefore new sidewalks are typically not included in the scope of work.
The existing gap between Timberwood Drive and Stone Creek Court, which has been identified
within the 2040 Comp plan as a deficiency, was reviewed as part of this study. Physical street
connection and associated utility relocations were determined to be feasible. Public comment
was solicited through a public open house. A public open house was conducted on December
15, 2021. Based on public feedback which was heavily in favor of maintaining the gap and
separation of the roadways it has been determined to keep the street configuration as it is
currently constructed. No change to the existing street configuration is proposed to be completed
as part of this project.
The total project cost for the proposed street improvements is summarized below in Table 2.
Itemized cost estimates are included in Appendix B.
Table 2: Estimated Street Improvement Project Costs
Proposed Street Improvements Total Estimated Street Project Cost
Brinker Area $497,147
Longacres Area $1,298,293
Stone Creek Area $1,111,496
Total Estimated Project Cost $2,906,936
Optional Street Improvements
Option A: Cul-de-sac center island removal.
The Longacres neighborhood was originally designed with landscaped areas in the center of the
cul-de-sac turn around areas. As an optional street improvement, we have reviewed the cost to
remove the landscaped areas and install standard street pavement. The center of the cul-de-sac
would then be paved with a street section matching the adjacent reclaimed pavement. Removing
the landscaped areas would allow for more efficient plowing and maintenance in the winter and
better access for large vehicles and trailers that would drive in the cul-de-sacs. Additional space
for occasional parking and lower overall maintenance costs would also be facilitated by
removing the landscaped areas.
The total approximate project cost to remove eight cul-de-sac islands is $44,127.
This cost would be in addition to Table 2 costs if selected.
B.Water System Improvements
Proposed water system improvements are indicated on Figures 1 to 4 in Appendix A.
The existing water system has been determined to still be in good condition overall. Historical
repair records along with physical inspections were used to evaluate gate valves, curb stops,
hydrants and other components within the system. The existing mainline pipes are comprised
of 6-inch to 12-inch ductile iron pipe watermain with copper services to residences. Minimal
167
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 6
repairs have been documented within the project area indicating good pipe condition. Gate
valves, hydrants, and curb stop valves have been inspected by City staff and the identified
deficiencies have been included in the plan for repair. Gate valve repairs will include bolt
replaced with new, stainless-steel bolts and replacement of any broken or damaged valve boxes.
Cathodic protection will also be added at each valve to provide additional protection from
corrosion. The clay soils in Chanhassen, and much of Carver County, have proven historically
to corrode mild steels that had been used on all valve bolts in past projects and those existing
bolts have deteriorated and corroded away leaving the valves in jeopardy of failing over time.
This issue was not known in the past when the infrastructure was originally constructed. By
adding Cathodic protection as part of this rehabilitation project, a known potential problem can
be addressed before it causes harm to the system.
The total project cost for the proposed water system improvements is summarized below in
Table 3. Itemized cost estimates are included in Appendix B.
Table 3: Estimated Water System Improvement Project Costs
Proposed Water Improvements Total Estimated Water Project Cost
Brinker Area $117,286
Longacres Area $286,823
Stone Creek Area $180,336
Total Estimated Project Cost $584,445
C.Stormwater Runoff Management System Improvements
Proposed Storm Sewer improvements are indicated on Figures 1 to 4 in Appendix A.
Storm Sewer
Most of the existing storm sewer system has been determined to be in good condition, and spot
repairs will be adequate to restore the sewer system to acceptable condition and capacity. In
accessible locations, failing sewer will be reconstructed. In locations impractical to access or
where a major site disturbance can be avoided, failing sewer will be rehabilitated with cured-in-
place pipe (CIPP) lining. CIPP lining involves installing a liner inside the sewer to restore pipe
integrity while also adding strength.
Draintile
Draintile is proposed for installation behind the curb in targeted areas to provide connections
for residential sump pumps with inadequate routing available and to provide additional drainage
for the street section in locations susceptible to intermittent saturation.
Sump Manholes with Baffles
Sump manholes with baffles are proposed directly upstream of outfalls to basins to provide pre-
treatment of runoff prior to discharge. The sump manholes will increase pollutant removal
efficiency of the overall system, extend the life of basins in the project area, and help meet
pollutant reductions required by the Bluff Creek TMDL.
Stormwater Treatment Ponds
All stormwater treatment ponds within the project area have an acceptable rating per the City’s
Storm Basin Maintenance Priority List. However, ponds BC-P4.2A and BC-P4.3 in the Stone
168
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 7
Creek Neighborhood were analyzed in further detail due to concerns received from City staff
and in resident survey responses.
Pond BC-P4.2A
Pond BC-P4.2A is located between Stone Creek Drive and Boulder Road, and residents around
the pond have expressed concern regarding occasional flooding and wet backyards. This pond
has a drainage area from residential development of 17.5 acres, with no other basins upstream.
It was constructed in 1992 as part of the original Stone Creek development, with a normal water
level (NWL) of 959.0 ft, an estimated high-water level (HWL) of 960.7 ft, an emergency surface
overflow (EOF) of 961.7 ft, and adjacent low floor elevation of 962.7 ft. The original design
provided 1 ft freeboard between the HWL and the EOF and 2 ft to the adjacent low floor (see
Table 4 for list of elevations).
Per site survey, the NWL has been confirmed at 958.94 ft, and the EOF is at 962.40 ft. Due to
increased precipitation amounts, the HWL is now estimated at 961.42 ft. This provides for 0.98
ft freeboard between the HWL and overflow, but only 1.28 ft to the adjacent low floor. When
this development was approved, the basin was designed using precipitation data from prior to
1960, including “dust bowl” years of the 1930s. This was standard practice across the Midwest
until 2014, when updated precipitation data was integrated into the design. Precipitation
frequencies and amounts have been on the rise in Minnesota since the late 1930s, and inadequate
freeboard to EOFs and adjacent low floors is now a common issue for older treatment ponds.
For this basin, utilizing the updated precipitation data results in approximately a 23% increase
in depth (from 5.95 inches to 7.34 inches) for the 100 year – 24-hour event, which is the current
standard to determine the HWL.
Potential solutions to mitigate issues resulting from the increased high-water level include
upsizing the outlet pipe, installing a new outlet pipe to storm sewer on Boulder Road east of the
pond, expanding the pond, lowering the NWL, and/or restoring the surface overflow elevation.
Upsizing the existing outlet presents multiple issues. Increase in discharge downstream would
increase the HWL of the downstream system, which would be in violation of City and watershed
rules. Further study by the City may determine the downstream system’s capacity to
accommodate some amount of increased discharge is possible. However, due to the proximity
of adjacent structures, depth of pipe, and steep slopes, removing existing and installing larger
pipe would be costly and require major disturbance. Therefore, this improvement option was
deemed impractical for inclusion with this project.
Installing a new outlet pipe to storm sewer on Boulder Road east of the pond also presents
multiple issues. Design of a new outlet to accommodate increased runoff and maintain the HWL
at the design level (960.7 ft) would require routing flow east to Pond BC-P4.3. Increase in
discharge to a new watershed would be in violation of City and watershed rules. In addition,
Pond BC-P4.3 does not have capacity to accommodate increased flow. Pond BC-P4.3 is
discussed in more detail in the next section.
Other potential solutions considered also include increasing the footprint of the pond to utilize
the entire Drainage and Utility Easement and lowering the pond NWL. The Drainage and Utility
easement was located at the designed HWL location (960.7 ft). The current estimated HWL is
outside the easement, so expansion is not feasible. Lowering the NWL would require
replacement of the outlet pipe. The outlet pipe is already at minimal recommended slope to
provide self-cleaning velocity and would require costly replacement due to access issues.
Therefore, lowering the NWL is also not feasible.
Restoration of the EOF design elevation and 1 ft freeboard between the EOF and the adjacent
low floors, would reduce potential flood risk to adjacent structures to the original approved
169
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 8
level. Installing a swale east of the pond will re-establish the overflow elevation, improve
drainage for the adjacent backyards, and is cost effective. Therefore, this improvement is
considered practical and feasible.
Table 4: Pond BC-P4.2A Characteristics
Design Current Condition
Normal Water Level (nwl)959.0 958.94
High Water Level (hwl)960.7 961.42
Surface Overflow 961.7 962.40
Adjacent Low Floor 962.7 962.7
Alternate Improvement: Pond BC-P4.3 Improvements
Pond BC-P4.3 is located south of Stone Creek Drive just west of the Boulder Road intersection,
and the City has expressed concerns regarding the normal water level, which results in storm
sewer in the street permanently submerged. This pond has a drainage area from residential
development of 27.6 acres, with no other basins upstream. It was constructed in 1994 as part of
the original Stone Creek development. However, the original design intentionally placed storm
sewer below the normal water level. This has resulted in pipe and street failure due to
freeze/thaw cycles. In addition, safety issues have been noted adjacent to this pond. A trail on
the east side of the pond connecting Stone Creek Drive to the Chanhassen High School facilities
and trail system south of the railroad property has insufficient clear space and inadequate slopes
adjacent to the trail. No clear space has been provided adjacent to the trail, and adjacent slopes
are approximately 2:1. In addition, the pond does not include a safety bench immediately below
the normal water level.
Proposed improvements would include installing a new outlet structure to lower the normal
water level, re-grading the pond to provide a minimum 3:1 slope between the trail and the normal
water level and a 5:1 safety bench below the normal water level and raising the street storm
sewer above the normal water level. These improvements would eliminate permanent flooding
of the street storm sewer and improve safety conditions for the trail adjacent to the pond. In
addition, layout adjustments would improve the ability of the City to plow the trail during the
winter. Adequate permanent storage and flood storage will be maintained to meet governmental
requirements and restrict peak flow rates to current conditions.
The total approximate project cost to complete Pond BC-P4.3 grading and trail improvements
is $110,615. This cost would be in addition to costs shown in Table 5.
Proposed improvements for streets, utilities, and Pond BC-P4.2A will not require additional
stormwater treatment facilities per local or State requirements. However, improvements to Pond
BC-P4.3 will require permit coordination with Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District
(RPBCWD) and Twin Cities & Western Railroad. Also, testing will be necessary to determine
if sediment is suitable for reuse. Therefore, installation of new outlet structure, trail
modifications, and pond re-grading should be coordinated and permitted on a separate schedule
if included as part of the overall project. Adjustments to the storm sewer within the street will
be completed with street construction as part of the base project.
The total project cost for the proposed storm system improvements is summarized below in
Table 5. Itemized cost estimates are included in Appendix B.
170
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.FINANCING & FUNDING
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 9
Table 5: Estimated Storm System Improvement Project Costs
Proposed Storm Improvements Total Estimated Storm Project Cost
Brinker Area $74,324
Longacres Area $399,178
Stone Creek Area $213,008
Total Estimated Project Cost $686,510
D.Sanitary System Improvements
Proposed Sanitary Sewer improvements are indicated on Figures 1 to 4 in Appendix A.
The existing sanitary sewer system has been determined to be in good overall condition.
Televising of each pipe segment and staff reports on each manhole were reviewed to develop a
need-based approach to repairs. The existing pipes are comprised of 8-inch PVC pipe with 4-
inch PVC services to residences. The proposed sanitary system improvements include spot
repairs to existing pipe where joint separation or cracking was observed as well as a combination
of pressure grouting, bench repair and barrel section replacement to repair manholes within the
system.
Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) is an issue with the existing sanitary system, this is the case in many
cities, not just Chanhassen. I&I is when storm and groundwater leak into cracks in the manholes
and sewer lines resulting in treatment of water that is not wastewater. To repair some of these
I&I locations, the proposed improvements will fill manhole cracks with injection grout where
feasible. Other manholes on the project will be partially or fully reconstructed as necessary to
eliminate the issue. All existing and proposed manholes will be receiving new Chanhassen lids
that do not have any holes on the surface, further eliminating any I&I openings.
The total project cost for the proposed sanitary system improvements is summarized below in
Table 6. Itemized cost estimates are included in Appendix B.
Table 6: Estimated Sanitary System Improvement Project Costs
Proposed Sanitary Improvements Total Estimated Sanitary Project Cost
Brinker Area $61,826
Longacres Area $115,644
Stone Creek Area $50,822
Total Estimated Project Cost $228,292
IV.FINANCING & FUNDING
A.Financing
Based on the assessment policy methodology, all of the components of the project presented in
this report can be financed through the sale of a Chapter 429 Improvement Bond and meet
171
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.FINANCING & FUNDING
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 10
the statutory requirement for a minimum assessable percentage of 20%. The Chapter 429
Bond is the most common financing method for local street reconstruction projects that
contain assessments. The Financing & Funding table located at the end of this section shows
that the estimated assessable percentage of the project with all components is 25.9% for the
unit method.
B.Funding
This project is proposed to be funded with general City funds and special assessments imposed
on benefiting properties. There are several funding sources proposed to fund the project
including the following:
Property Tax Revenue
Sanitary Sewer Revenues
Water Revenues
Surface Water Revenues
Franchise Fee Revenues
Special Assessments
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
STONE CREEK AREA
The total project costs for the proposed project are apportioned as follows:
RECOMMENDED FUNDING
SOURCE
Total Project Cost $1,666,278.01
Standard Street Cost $1,111,495.64 PMP Fund and Special Assessments
Pond Grading & Trail (Optional)$110,615.47 Surface Water Fund
Storm Sewer Improvements $213,008.25 Surface Water Fund
Sanitary Sewer Cost $50,822.30 Sanitary Sewer Fund
Watermain Cost $180,336.35 Watermain Fund
Street Costs (Unit Method)
Total Standard Street Cost $1,111,495.64
City Contribution (60%)$666,897.38
Assessable Portion (40%)$444,598.26
Total Units 141
Cost Per Unit $3,153.18
Total Assessed Amount $444,598.26 Special Assessments
Total City Cost $666,897.38 PMP Fund
172
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.FINANCING & FUNDING
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 11
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
BRINKER AREA
The total project costs for the proposed project are apportioned as follows:
RECOMMENDED FUNDING
SOURCE
Total Project Cost $750,582.63
Street Standard Cost $497,146.89 PMP Fund and Special Assessments
Storm Sewer Improvements $74,323.77 Surface Water Fund
Sanitary Sewer Cost $61,826.33 Sanitary Sewer Fund
Watermain Cost $117,285.64 Watermain Fund
Street Costs (Unit Method)
Total Standard Street Cost $497,146.89
City Contribution (60%)$298,288.13
Assessable Portion (40%)$198,858.76
Total Units 88
Cost Per Unit $2,259.76
Total Assessed Amount $198,858.76 Special Assessments
Total City Cost $298,288.13 PMP Fund
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
LONGACRES AREA
The total project costs for the proposed project are apportioned as follows:
RECOMMENDED FUNDING
SOURCE
Total Project Cost $2,144,064.81
Street Standard Cost $1,298,292.82 PMP Fund and Special Assessments
Cul-De-Sac Island Removal (Optional)$44,127.31
Storm Sewer Improvements $399,177.70 Surface Water Fund
Sanitary Sewer Cost $115,643.95 Sanitary Sewer Fund
Watermain Cost $286,823.03 Watermain Fund
Street Costs (Unit Method)
Total Standard Street Cost $1,342,420.13
City Contribution (60%)$805,452.08
173
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.FINANCING & FUNDING
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 12
Assessable Portion (40%)$536,968.05
Total Units 183
Cost Per Unit $2,934.25
Total Assessed Amount $536,968.05 Special Assessments
Total City Cost $805,452.08 PMP Fund
174
PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES TABLE
FOR
2022 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
12/31/2021
PROPOSED PROJECT COMPONENTS
TOTALS
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
PROJECT ASSESS.CITY ASSESS.
COST AMOUNT COST %
STREET RECONSTRUCTION $2,951,063 $1,180,425 $1,770,638 40.0%
STORM SEWER/STORM TREATMENT $797,125 $0 $797,125 0.0%
SANITARY SEWER $228,293 $0 $228,293 0.0%
WATERMAIN $584,445 $0 $584,445 0.0%
TOTALS:$4,560,925 $1,180,425 $3,380,500 25.9%
175
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.ASSESSMENTS
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 13
V.ASSESSMENTS
The project is proposed to be assessed to the benefiting properties in accordance with the adopted
City Assessment Practices policy as follows:
Street Rehabilitation:40% Assessed on a Unit Basis
Watermain:100% City Cost
Storm Sewer:100% City Cost
Sanitary Sewer:100% City Cost
Figure 6 through 9 of Appendix A indicate the proposed assessment area. Properties included on the
preliminary assessment roll include those that have access to a street within the project area. The
estimated assessment amount for each property is tabulated on the preliminary assessment roll
located at the end of this section. A copy of the current Assessment Practice policy is included in
Appendix C of this report for reference.
The street improvement portion of the project cost is proposed to be assessed based on the Unit
method. The amount to be assessed is calculated separately for each neighborhood and summarized
in the following Table 7. The amount to be assessed to each property is calculated by taking 40% of
the street cost and dividing by the total number of units within the neighborhood. Each property,
within a neighborhood, that has access to a street that is proposed to be improved is assigned 1 unit.
Table 7: Preliminary Assessment Amount
Neighborhood Estimated Assessment Amount (Unit)
Brinker Area $2,259.76
Longacres Area $2,934.25
Stone Creek Area $3,153.18
176
12345678
910
11
12
13 14 15 16
17
18
1920212223
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36 37
38 39
40
41
42 43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
636465666768
70
69
90898887
86
85
84
83
82
81 80
79
78
77
76
75
74
73
97
96
95
94
93
92
91
98
99
141
140
139
138
137 136
135
134
133
132
131
130
129
128
127
126
125
124
123
122
121
120
119
118
117
116
115
114
113
112
111
110
109108
107106105
104
103
102
101
100
72
71
BRIDLE CREEK TRAIL
STONE CREEK ROADSTONE CREEK DRIVEBOUL
DE
R
R
O
A
D
RENAISSANCE COUR
T
TIMBERWOOD DRIVEBRIDLE
GALPIN CO
U
R
T
CS
A
H
.
N
O
.
1
8GALPIN BOULEVARDSTONE CREEK LANE
W
E
S
T
STONE CREEK LANE
E
A
S
T
CR
E
E
K
CIRCLECHIC
A
G
O,
MIL
W
A
U
K
E
E, S
T.
P
A
UL
A
N
D
P
A
CIFI
C
R
AIL
R
O
A
D STONE CREEKCOURTH:\CHAN\0C1125874\CAD\C3D\FIGR-125874-ASSESSMENTS.dwg 1/19/2022 2:25:03 PMR
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project
City of Chanhassen
Figure 6: Stone Creek Area Assessments
January 2022
R
FEETSCALE
0 120 240
HORZ.
ASSESSMENT AREA
PROPERTY NUMBER
PROPOSED REHABILITATION AREA
LEGEND
XXX
177
142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163164165166167168169170171172173174
176
177
178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190
191192193194195196197198199200
201
202
203
231 230 229 228 227 226 225 224 223 222
221
220
219
218217
216
215214
213
212211
210
209208
207
206
205
204
TULIP COURTCROCUS COURTWINDMILL DRIVEBRINKER STREET
MAJESTIC WAY
PR
A
I
R
I
E
F
L
O
W
E
R
B
L
V
D
HUNTER DRIVE
GALPIN BLVDPAISL
E
Y
P
A
T
H
F
AW
N
H
I
L
L
R
O
A
D
FAW
N
H
I
L
L
C
O
U
R
T
CLOVER COURT
WALNUT CURVE
175
H:\CHAN\0C1125874\CAD\C3D\FIGR-125874-ASSESSMENTS.dwg 1/19/2022 2:25:08 PMR
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project
City of Chanhassen
Figure 7: Brinker Area Assessments
January 2022
R
FEETSCALE
0 120 240
HORZ.
ASSESSMENT AREA
PROPERTY NUMBER
PROPOSED REHABILITATION AREA
LEGEND
XXX
178
LO
N
G
A
C
R
E
S
D
R
I
V
EHILLSDALE COURT
GUNFLINT
TRA
ILGUNFLINT COURTARROWHEAD LANE
ARRO
W
HE
A
D
COU
RT
HIGHOVER DRIVEHIGHCREST
C
IRCLE
MOCCASIN TRAILSOUTHERN COURTMOCCASIN TRAILBENT
B
O
W
T
R
A
I
L
BENT BOW
T
R
A
I
L
HUNTER DRI
V
E
T
H
4
1
H
A
Z
E
L
T
I
N
E
B
L
V
D
RIDGEVIEW POI
NT
RIDGE
VIE
W
W
AYVASSERMAN TRAILCEN
T
U
R
Y
B
L
V
D
CENTURYTRAIL316
232
233
234
235
236
237
238239
240
241
242
243 244 245 246
247
248
249
250
251
317
318
319 320 321
322
309310311312
313
314
315
296
295
294
293292
291
290289
288
287
286 285
284
283
282
281
280
279
278
277
276
275
274
273
272 271
270
269 268
308307306305304303302301
300
299
298
297
260
259
258
261
262
263 264
265 266
257 256
255
254
253
252
267
H:\CHAN\0C1125874\CAD\C3D\FIGR-125874-ASSESSMENTS.dwg 1/19/2022 2:25:13 PMR
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project
City of Chanhassen
Figure 8: Longacres Area Assessments
January 2022
RFEETSCALE
0 120 240
HORZ.ASSESSMENT AREA
PROPERTY NUMBER
PROPOSED REHABILITATION AREA
LEGEND
XXX
179
TULIP COURT
CROCUS COURTBRINKER STREETMAJESTIC WAYHUNTER DRIVECOU
N
T
Y
R
O
A
D
N
O
.
1
1
7
GALPIN BLVD
PAIS
LEY
PATHHARRISON HILL COURTHARRISON
H
I
L
L
T
R
A
I
L
FAW
N
H
I
L
L
R
O
A
D
RED FOX CIRCLELOD
G
E
P
O
L
E
P
O
I
N
T
WALNUT CURVENOR
T
H
W
O
O
D
C
O
U
R
T
LON
G
A
C
R
E
S
D
R
I
V
EFAWN HILL COURTFAWN HI
L
L
R
O
A
D
323
324
325
326327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340 341 342
343
344
345
346
347
348349
350
351
352
353
354
355
364365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384385
386
387
388
389
390
391
412
413
414
411
410
392393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407 408 409
417
416
415
363
362
361
360
359
358
357356
H:\CHAN\0C1125874\CAD\C3D\FIGR-125874-ASSESSMENTS.dwg 1/19/2022 2:25:18 PMR
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project
City of Chanhassen
Figure 9: Longacres Area Assessments
January 2022
RFEETSCALE
0 120 240
HORZ.ASSESSMENT AREA
PROPERTY NUMBER
PROPOSED REHABILITATION AREA
LEGEND
XXX
180
2022 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - STONE CREEK AREA
12/31/2021
OWNER OWNER ADDRESS P.I.D.
STREET ASSESSMENT *ANNUAL
ASSMT
PAYMENTPROP.PROPERTY ASSMT STREET NOTES
NO.ADDRESS UNIT ASSMT
STONE CREEK AREA
1 MICHAEL D & HOLLY S NELSON 2260 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2260 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150160 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
2 PATRICIA WHITEMAN TRUST 2272 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2272 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150150 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
3 JASON & LAURA SKISTAD 2284 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2284 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160160 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
4 BRADY WALTER JAHNKE 2300 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2300 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160150 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
5 KRISTYN CLARK GOLBERG BAKER 2314 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2314 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160140 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
6 JEFFREY BROWN 2328 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2328 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160130 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
7 CHARLES O & ERIN M BUSALACCHI 2342 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2342 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160120 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
8 JAMES A & LAURIE LISIGNOLI 2356 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2356 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160110 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
9 WILLIAM G JR & PAMELA FRANZEN 2370 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2370 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160100 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
10 GREGORY SCOTT CORNMAN JR 2382 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2382 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160090 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
11 TOM & SOMMANA MONTHISANE 2381 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2381 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160080 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
12 RICHARD B & CHRYSAUNA A BUAN 2369 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2369 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160070 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
13 DONNELL CRAYTON 2357 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2357 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160060 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
14 YAEL MIRIAM ROBIN 2345 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2345 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160050 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
15 LI LU 2333 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2333 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160040 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
16 R CHRIS RUMBLE 2321 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7413 2321 STONE CREEK LANE WEST 258160030 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
17 JOHN R & GENA K SWISHER 8420 STONE CREEK RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7411 8420 STONE CREEK ROAD 258160020 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
18 PETER B & CLAIRE S MITCHELL 8430 STONE CREEK RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7411 8430 STONE CREEK ROAD 258160010 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
19 CALEB WILLIAM FOX AND AMY ANN FOX TRUST 2294 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2294 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140010 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
20 JEFFRY S & LINDSEY L FINCH 2304 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7403 2304 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258130050 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
21 SETH CRAIG 2318 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7403 2318 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258130040 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
22 PAUL BOTES 2332 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7403 2332 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258130030 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
23 JOHN F & LAURIE SULLIVAN 2346 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7403 2346 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258130020 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
24 JOHN D & JODEE A MURPHY 2360 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7403 2360 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258130010 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
25 TIMOTHY J WHIPPS 2374 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7403 2374 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258110220 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
26 ADAM KING 2375 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2375 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258130060 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
27 ERIC F LAMOTE 2361 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2361 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258130070 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
28 RODDY Y & LAURIE L W ZIVKOVICH 2337 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2337 BOULDER ROAD 258110010 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
29 DANIEL J & PAMELA J CULHANE 2333 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2333 BOULDER ROAD 258110020 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
30 JOEL E & HEIDI M LEHRKE 2329 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2329 BOULDER ROAD 258110030 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
31 MORLOCK-ROMANSKI REV LIV TRUST 2325 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2325 BOULDER ROAD 258110040 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
32 JUSTIN L WILEY 2321 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2321 BOULDER ROAD 258110050 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
33 KENNETH B BAKER 2317 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2317 BOULDER ROAD 258110060 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
34 RORY D & AMY J LEA 2313 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2313 BOULDER ROAD 258110070 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
35 GERHARD & HELENE A SCHOCK 2309 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2309 BOULDER ROAD 258110080 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
36 MICHAEL & JACQUELINE R MROSKO 2305 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2305 BOULDER ROAD 258110090 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
37 MATTHEW SCHILLERSTROM 2301 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2301 BOULDER ROAD 258110100 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
38 SARAH L WENDORF REVOCABLE TRUST 2291 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2291 BOULDER ROAD 258110110 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
39 NEVIN A SEQUEIRA 2279 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2279 BOULDER ROAD 258110120 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
40 SCOTT A HANSON 2267 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2267 BOULDER ROAD 258120100 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
41 DANIEL J & NANCY R LYNCH 2255 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2255 BOULDER ROAD 258120110 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
42 JORDAN BRONCE 2243 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2243 BOULDER ROAD 258120120 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
43 O'BRIEN COLMAN FAMILY TRUST 2231 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2231 BOULDER ROAD 258120130 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
44 DENICE JEAN HOUWMAN 2219 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2219 BOULDER ROAD 258120140 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
45 JAYSON R NELSON 2207 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2207 BOULDER ROAD 258120150 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
46 DAVID HESTER 2199 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2199 BOULDER ROAD 258120160 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
47 CHAD K & ROCHELLE E CURTIS 2187 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2187 BOULDER ROAD 258120170 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
48 BRADLEY J & RENEE L VANBERGEN 2175 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2175 BOULDER ROAD 258120180 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
49 MARDI SUZANNE MILLER 2163 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2163 BOULDER ROAD 258120190 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
50 JOHN M DREVLOW 2151 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2151 BOULDER ROAD 258130150 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
51 THOR SMITH LIVING TRUST 2139 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2139 BOULDER ROAD 258130160 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
52 CAROLYN A MILLER 2127 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2127 BOULDER ROAD 258130170 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
53 MICHAEL D CASTAGNETTO 2115 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2115 BOULDER ROAD 258130180 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
54 MARK R & CARLEEN A LAPINSKI 2103 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2103 BOULDER ROAD 258130190 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
55 JAMES A WALL 2093 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 2093 BOULDER ROAD 258130200 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
56 DANIEL STOY 2079 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 2079 BOULDER ROAD 258130210 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
57 PAUL S JOHNSON 2065 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 2065 BOULDER ROAD 258140420 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
181
58 KHAM KONGRATSSY 2051 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 2051 BOULDER ROAD 258140430 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
59 THOMAS TODD COOK 2037 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 2037 BOULDER ROAD 258140440 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
60 ANN MARSO 14575 WILDS VIEW NW PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372-2023 BOULDER ROAD 258140450 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
61 MARVIN V & CAROLE J LUECK 2019 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7410 2019 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140460 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
62 ERIK M & LISA A MAGNUSON 2001 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7410 2001 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140470 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
63 CHERYL ROSS 2000 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2000 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140220 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
64 ROBERT J & CYNTHIA L EGELSTON 2018 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7410 2018 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140210 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
65 MARC B & LAURA S OLSON 2034 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7410 2034 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140200 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
66 LUTFI TARDIA 2050 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2050 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140190 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
67 RENATA ANNE BRAUDY 2066 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2066 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140180 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
68 PAUL & ANN KLOTH 2082 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7410 2082 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140170 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
69 SHANNON J HORGAN 8429 STONE CREEK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7408 8429 STONE CREEK COURT 258140160 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
70 ADAM S TEBBS 8409 STONE CREEK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7408 8409 STONE CREEK COURT 258140150 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
71 CORY DALBEC 8410 STONE CREEK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8410 STONE CREEK COURT 258140140 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
72 CORY RS CATER 8426 STONE CREEK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7408 8426 STONE CREEK COURT 258140130 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
73 MARIE A GUILLAUME 2126 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 2126 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140120 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
74 CHRISTOPHER T HARTWIGSEN 2140 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 2140 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140110 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
75 JASON GEYEN 2154 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2154 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140100 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
76 STEPHEN & TRACY ULANOSKI 2168 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 2168 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140090 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
77 TRUST OF ALAN SHERWOOD & CHARLENE SPARTZ 2182 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 2182 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140080 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
78 SPENSER D WILLIAMSON 2196 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2196 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140070 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
79 PATRICK J & CAROLYN H TOMMINS 2210 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 2210 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140060 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
80 SANDRA E SCHMALL REV TRUST 2224 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2224 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140050 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
81 TAYLOR G HARWOOD 2238 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 2238 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140040 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
82 PHILIP DAVIS 2252 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 2252 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140030 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
83 RICHARD J & ANN L KALGREN 2266 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 2266 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140020 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
84 BEVERLY A HUGHES 8441 STONE CREEK RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7411 8441 STONE CREEK ROAD 258150010 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
85 CHIN V NGUYEN 8433 STONE CREEK RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7411 8433 STONE CREEK ROAD 258150020 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
86 MAX A CARRUTH 8429 STONE CREEK RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 STONE CREEK ROAD 258150030 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
87 JASON M & JENNIFER J SYVERSON 2275 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7412 2275 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150040 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
88 GREGORY R & JENNIFER H BAXTER 2263 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7412 2263 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150050 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
89 JEFFREY M BUSH 2251 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7412 2251 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150060 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
90 MARQUES BLANK 2239 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2239 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150070 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
91 JASON L & SHEILA J BRASTAD 2227 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7412 2227 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150080 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
92 ALEXANDER W ZEMAN 2215 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7412 2215 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150090 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
93 HOWARD K RIEBLING 2214 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7412 2214 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150100 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
94 ROBIN L OXLEY 2222 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7412 2222 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150110 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
95 DEAN D & MONICA M HELD 2230 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7412 2230 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150120 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
96 RYAN ANDERSON 2236 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7412 2236 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150130 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
97 MICHAEL J & LORI L JUELICH 2246 STONE CREEK LN E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7412 2246 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 258150140 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
98 BONITA ANN JUNGELS 2338 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2338 BOULDER ROAD 258110130 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
99 NANCY GAGICH 2334 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2334 BOULDER ROAD 258110140 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
100 DAVID D & KATHLEEN A THORP 2330 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2330 BOULDER ROAD 258110150 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
101 JEFFREY J ALTHOFF 2326 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2326 BOULDER ROAD 258110160 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
102 DOUGLAS VERNON JOHNSON 2322 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2322 BOULDER ROAD 258110170 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
103 JAMES M & JENNIFER D LARRANAGA 2318 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2318 BOULDER ROAD 258110180 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
104 MATTHEW & ROBIN WARDEN 2308 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 2308 BOULDER ROAD 258110190 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
105 BRIAN T & SONYA A BENKSTEIN 2292 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2292 BOULDER ROAD 258110200 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
106 DAVID HERKENHOFF 2280 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2280 BOULDER ROAD 258110210 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
107 DAVID B ZIMMERMAN 2266 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2266 BOULDER ROAD 258120010 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
108 JENNIFER BAYER 2254 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2254 BOULDER ROAD 258120020 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
109 ALICIA D METZEN 2242 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2242 BOULDER ROAD 258120030 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
110 SALLIE L BERGESON 2220 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2220 BOULDER ROAD 258120040 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
111 STEVEN L & JONI L HANSEN 2208 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 2208 BOULDER ROAD 258120050 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
112 CHAD A & JULIE M EVEN 2198 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2198 BOULDER ROAD 258120060 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
113 MARK SCHMIDT 2186 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2186 BOULDER ROAD 258120070 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
114 TIMOTHY N & TERRI L RENDALL 2174 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2174 BOULDER ROAD 258120080 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
115 NICHOLAS J HAYWOOD 2162 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2162 BOULDER ROAD 258120090 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
116 KEVIN M & LAURA K CARLSON 2150 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2150 BOULDER ROAD 258130080 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
117 JONATAN TISHLER 2136 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2136 BOULDER ROAD 258130090 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
118 STEPHEN J KNAUFF 2122 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2122 BOULDER ROAD 258130100 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
119 ROBERT J & CHRISTINE R FINN 2108 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 2108 BOULDER ROAD 258130110 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
120 JEFFREY HAY 2094 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 2094 BOULDER ROAD 258130120 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
121 KENNETH D KUCIK 2080 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2080 BOULDER ROAD 258130130 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
122 KATHLEEN C BATTIS 2066 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2066 BOULDER ROAD 258130140 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
123 JEFFREY R & EDITH M STEARNS 2052 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 2052 BOULDER ROAD 258140410 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
124 EUGENE C & JAN M KRUCHOSKI 2030 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 2030 BOULDER ROAD 258140400 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
125 JEFFREY MARK COOKLE 2063 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2063 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140390 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
126 RONALD S & LAURIE A BLUM 2081 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7410 2081 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140380 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
127 CHAD GORDON SCHMIDT 2109 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2109 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140370 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
128 PAUL & LINDA SPEKMAN 2121 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 2121 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140360 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
2022 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - STONE CREEK AREA
12/31/2021
OWNER OWNER ADDRESS P.I.D.
STREET ASSESSMENT *ANNUAL
ASSMT
PAYMENTPROP.PROPERTY ASSMT STREET NOTES
NO.ADDRESS UNIT ASSMT
182
129 MICHAEL HEADLEY 2133 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2133 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140350 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
130 TIMOTHY CUSHMAN 2145 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 2145 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140340 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
131 NICHOLAS J AMATUCCIO 2157 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2157 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140330 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
132 ELIZABETH M LOCH 2169 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 2169 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140320 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
133 KAYTLYN O GORMLEY 2181 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2181 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140310 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
134 KATHRYN B DALMASSO 2193 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 2193 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140300 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
135 JEREMY J WHITEMAN 2203 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 2203 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140290 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
136 PAUL L & LYNETTE M ERICKSON 2217 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 2217 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140280 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
137 KAJ & JODI M DOERRING 2231 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 2231 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140270 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
138 CARL D RAY 2245 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 2245 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140260 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
139 CHET A LARSON 2259 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 2259 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140250 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
140 DAVID W & LYNNETTE A BAILEY 2273 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 2273 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140240 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
141 PAT AND MICHELLE MCNALLAN LIVING TRUST 2287 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2287 STONE CREEK DRIVE 258140230 1 $3,153.18 $492.81
Assessment Basis Unit 141.00 $444,598.26
Notes:
*Based on Interest Rate 2% Above Bonding Cost ( = 3.25% + 2.0% = 5.25%) and Term Equal to Bond Term ( = 8 Years).
2022 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - STONE CREEK AREA
12/31/2021
OWNER OWNER ADDRESS P.I.D.
STREET ASSESSMENT *ANNUAL
ASSMT
PAYMENTPROP.PROPERTY ASSMT STREET NOTES
NO.ADDRESS UNIT ASSMT
183
2022 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - BRINKER AREA
12/31/2021
OWNER OWNER ADDRESS P.I.D.
STREET ASSESSMENT *ANNUAL
ASSMT
PAYMENTPROP.PROPERTY ASSMT STREET NOTES
NO.ADDRESS UNIT ASSMT
BRINKER AREA
142 DAKE N & DEIRDRA CHATFIELD 2200 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9354 2200 MAJESTIC WAY 257530010 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
143 PAUL D JOHNSON 2174 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9353 2174 MAJESTIC WAY 257530020 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
144 RYAN PERRY ELLSWORTH 2150 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2150 MAJESTIC WAY 257530030 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
145 TIMOTHY NORDBERG 2126 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9353 2126 MAJESTIC WAY 257530040 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
146 MEHDI AYOUCHE 2102 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9353 2102 MAJESTIC WAY 257530050 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
147 JEFFREY S & CRISTIN L MASCHKA 2086 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9352 2086 MAJESTIC WAY 257530060 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
148 CHERREE R THEISEN 2072 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9352 2072 MAJESTIC WAY 257530070 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
149 JOSHUA KIMBER 2060 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9352 2060 MAJESTIC WAY 257530080 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
150 MATTHEW & MICHELLE N MYERS 7421 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9366 7421 WINDMILL DRIVE 257530090 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
151 DAVID SENIOR 7431 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9366 7431 WINDMILL DRIVE 257530100 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
152 BRADLEIGH SAWYER 7441 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7441 WINDMILL DRIVE 257530110 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
153 MICHAEL BURRIS 7451 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7451 WINDMILL DRIVE 257530120 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
154 ALLAN R & MARY J OLSON 7461 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9366 7461 WINDMILL DRIVE 258880010 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
155 CHRIS WILLIAM ORCUTT 7481 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9366 7481 WINDMILL DRIVE 258880020 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
156 MARK S FEYEREISEN 7501 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9365 7501 WINDMILL DRIVE 258880030 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
157 CHARLES E & LORETTA GOETZINGER 7521 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9365 7521 WINDMILL DRIVE 258880040 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
158 DAVID W CALLISTER 7541 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9365 7541 WINDMILL DRIVE 258880050 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
159 WILLIAM R JACQUES 7545 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9394 7545 WALNUT CURVE 258480150 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
160 BENTON OLSON 7547 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7547 WALNUT CURVE 258480160 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
161 THOMAS S & PATRICIA L BREMER 7551 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9394 7551 WALNUT CURVE 258480170 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
162 NICHOLAS R HANSGEN 7555 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9394 7555 WALNUT CURVE 258480180 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
163 PETER WARNER 7559 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7559 WALNUT CURVE 258480190 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
164 PAUL S & NANCY J BODDICKER 7563 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9394 7563 WALNUT CURVE 258480200 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
165 RYAN R JOHNSON 7567 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7567 WALNUT CURVE 258480210 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
166 JASON RUD 7571 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9394 7571 WALNUT CURVE 258480220 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
167 KARI LYNN CARSTENSEN 7575 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7575 WALNUT CURVE 258480230 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
168 LUCAS BAME 611 N 104TH ST MILWAUKEE, WI 53226-4327 7579 WALNUT CURVE 258480240 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
169 KARI L FINBERG-SHOOLER 7583 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7583 WALNUT CURVE 258480250 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
170 LONG D NGUYEN 7587 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9394 7587 WALNUT CURVE 258480260 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
171 BRIAN & KAREN WALKER 7591 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9394 7591 WALNUT CURVE 258480270 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
172 DANIEL S & TAMERA K SHREVE 7595 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9394 7595 WALNUT CURVE 258480280 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
173 AMY M HERNANDEZ 7599 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7599 WALNUT CURVE 258480290 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
174 ROBERT SWANSON 7601 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7601 WALNUT CURVE 258480300 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
175 DAVID K & CHRISTINA J STREETER 7598 PRAIRIE FLOWER BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9398 7598 PRAIRIE FLOWER BOULEVARD 258480710 ACCESS TO PRAIRIE FLOWER BLVD
176 THEODORE A & ANGELA M ELLEFSON 7609 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9395 7609 WALNUT CURVE 258480700 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
177 NATHAN SEVERSON 7606 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9397 7606 WALNUT CURVE 258480010 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
178 KYLE A & LEAH C PLATH 7604 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9397 7604 WALNUT CURVE 258480020 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
179 KODEY S SIMON 7602 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9397 7602 WALNUT CURVE 258480030 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
180 MARK & ANN M STRUTHERS 7600 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9397 7600 WALNUT CURVE 258480040 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
181 JOEL W ROBERTSON 7596 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9393 7596 WALNUT CURVE 258480050 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
182 JEREMY JOSEPH SINON 7592 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9393 7592 WALNUT CURVE 258480060 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
183 AMANDA R KARASEK 7588 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9393 7588 WALNUT CURVE 258480070 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
184 JOSEPH MARRAZZO 7584 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9393 7584 WALNUT CURVE 258480080 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
185 ALAN E & JAN M YOUNG 7580 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9393 7580 WALNUT CURVE 258480090 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
186 DOUGLAS LEE PERNULA 7576 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9393 7576 WALNUT CURVE 258480100 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
187 JAMES D HAIDER 7572 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9393 7572 WALNUT CURVE 258480110 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
188 PATRICK M RUTLEDGE 7568 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9393 7568 WALNUT CURVE 258480120 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
189 VICTOR D II & CAROLYN R DOYLE 7564 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9393 7564 WALNUT CURVE 258480130 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
190 HILARY DOLAN 7550 WALNUT CURV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7550 WALNUT CURVE 258480140 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
191 JEAN M KINGSRUD 2027 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9360 2027 BRINKER STREET 258880230 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
192 KEVIN J JOYCE 2043 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9360 2043 BRINKER STREET 258880240 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
193 KATHLEEN A HALDEMAN 2059 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9360 2059 BRINKER STREET 258880250 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
194 JAMES E & JACQUELINE A SCHMIDT 2075 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9360 2075 BRINKER STREET 258880260 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
195 BRIAN R ERDMAN 2091 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9360 2091 BRINKER STREET 258880270 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
196 BRIAN W MARTODAM 2103 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9361 2103 BRINKER STREET 258880280 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
197 TAO YANG 2117 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9361 2117 BRINKER STREET 258880290 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
198 MICHAEL L AKER 2131 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9361 2131 BRINKER STREET 258880300 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
199 DWAYNE A STRAND 2145 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9361 2145 BRINKER STREET 258880310 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
200 STEVEN L & CINDY M BRODIGAN 2159 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9361 2159 BRINKER STREET 258880320 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
201 SCOTT C ROBBINS 2173 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2173 BRINKER STREET 258880330 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
202 CUI SUN 2187 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9361 2187 BRINKER STREET 258880340 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
203 STEVEN J & NADIA M JANSON 2199 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9361 2199 BRINKER STREET 258880350 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
204 JOCELYN J O'BRIEN 2198 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9359 2198 BRINKER STREET 258880220 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
205 ROGER J & SALLY A HAMM 2180 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9359 2180 BRINKER STREET 258880210 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
206 OMAR E TAHA 7508 TULIP CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9330 7508 TULIP COURT 258880200 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
207 ROBERT W MCMANUS JR 7490 TULIP CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7490 TULIP COURT 258880190 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
208 MARK SEEFELDT 7470 TULIP CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9330 7470 TULIP COURT 258880180 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
209 BRIAN M LARAMY 7471 TULIP CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9330 7471 TULIP COURT 258880170 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
210 THOMPSON FAMILY TRUST 7419 TULIP CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7491 TULIP COURT 258880160 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
211 DANIEL R & LATASHA R SLINDEN 7509 TULIP CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9330 7509 TULIP COURT 258880150 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
212 KEVIN J & CHERYL C KOHLER 7510 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9351 7510 CROCUS COURT 258880140 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
213 CHARLES PETERSON 7496 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9351 7496 CROCUS COURT 258880130 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
214 JAMES A & LESA W BOETTCHER 7476 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9351 7476 CROCUS COURT 258880120 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
215 MICHAEL WESCHE 7475 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9351 7475 CROCUS COURT 258880110 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
184
216 JOEL W & SUSAN M REIMERS 7495 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9351 7495 CROCUS COURT 258880100 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
217 ERIC JAMES MAHER 7511 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9351 7511 CROCUS COURT 258880090 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
218 CHRISTOPHER R & KARI T HENTGES 7500 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9363 7500 WINDMILL DRIVE 258880080 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
219 STEVEN GERALD SELINGER 7480 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7480 WINDMILL DRIVE 258880070 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
220 JEROLD R CLAIR 7460 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9362 7460 WINDMILL DRIVE 258880060 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
221 SENGTAVANH B & MARIO S MEAS 7440 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9362 7440 WINDMILL DRIVE 257530230 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
222 HSIN-HUNG HUANG 2045 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9356 2045 MAJESTIC WAY 257530220 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
223 TRENT J MAHR 2065 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9356 2065 MAJESTIC WAY 257530210 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
224 DAGMAR DIETHELM REVOCABLE INTERVIVOS TRU 2085 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2085 MAJESTIC WAY 257530200 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
225 JOAN E WEIS 2101 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9355 2101 MAJESTIC WAY 257530190 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
226 JOHN D & CAROL A P PITZ 2117 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9355 2117 MAJESTIC WAY 257530180 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
227 DAVID KOELLN 2133 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9355 2133 MAJESTIC WAY 257530170 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
228 WILLIAM K & KRISTINE GUGGEMOS 2165 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9355 2165 MAJESTIC WAY 257530150 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
229 DAVID K WEIBY 2149 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9355 2149 MAJESTIC WAY 257530160 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
230 KENNETH LEER 2181 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9355 2181 MAJESTIC WAY 257530140 1 $2,259.76 $353.18
Assessment Basis Unit 88.00 $198,858.76
Notes:
*Based on Interest Rate 2% Above Bonding Cost ( = 3.25% + 2.0% = 5.25%) and Term Equal to Bond Term ( = 8 Years).
2022 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - BRINKER AREA
12/31/2021
OWNER OWNER ADDRESS P.I.D.
STREET ASSESSMENT *ANNUAL
ASSMT
PAYMENTPROP.PROPERTY ASSMT STREET NOTES
NO.ADDRESS UNIT ASSMT
185
2022 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - LONGACRES AREA
12/31/2021
OWNER OWNER ADDRESS P.I.D.
STREET ASSESSMENT *ANNUAL
ASSMT
PAYMENTPROP.PROPERTY ASSMT STREET NOTES
NO.ADDRESS UNIT ASSMT
LONGACRES AREA
231 BLAKE M & TAMI C GOTTSCHALK 2197 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9355 2197 MAJESTIC WAY 257530130 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
232 DAVID M & AMY K LYONS 7320 HILLSDALE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7548 7320 HILLSDALE COURT 254530220 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
233 EDWIN H CALDIE III 7298 HILLSDALE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7298 HILLSDALE COURT 254530230 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
234 DAVID O CRANDALL 7270 HILLSDALE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7270 HILLSDALE COURT 254530240 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
235 THOMAS J DOLL PO BOX 148 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-0148 7264 HILLSDALE COURT 250091900 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
236 AHMAD SHALABI 7260 HILLSDALE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7548 7260 HILLSDALE COURT 254530310 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
237 CESAR N DOMINGUEZ 7250 HILLSDALE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7548 7250 HILLSDALE COURT 254530300 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
238 ANDREW J PAUTZ 7265 HILLSDALE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7548 7265 HILLSDALE COURT 254530290 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
239 ERIC K & KELLY J DETTMER 7275 HILLSDALE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7548 7275 HILLSDALE COURT 254530280 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
240 SHONNA M TRAVIS TRUST AGREEMENT 7297 HILLSDALE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7297 HILLSDALE COURT 254530270 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
241 JOHN W & SHARON K CERJANCE 7301 HILLSDALE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7548 7301 HILLSDALE COURT 254530260 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
242 DARYL S & KRISTEN D MCLINDEN 7321 HILLSDALE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7548 7321 HILLSDALE COURT 254530250 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
243 DAVID YOST 7256 GUNFLINT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7576 7256 GUNFLINT TRAIL 254570040 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
244 ZACHARY CARPENTER 7240 GUNFLINT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7240 GUNFLINT TRAIL 254570030 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
245 BRADLEY HAMILTON WOLKEN 7216 GUNFLINT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7576 7216 GUNFLINT TRAIL 254570020 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
246 E JAMES DOBSON 7210 GUNFLINT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7576 7210 GUNFLINT TRAIL 254570010 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
247 JAMES R & MARY E VALENTINE 2476 GUNFLINT CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7575 2476 GUNFLINT COURT 254570050 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
248 ANDREW P MERRILL 2484 GUNFLINT CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7575 2484 GUNFLINT COURT 254570060 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
249 JOHN H & SARAH E DRITZ 2493 GUNFLINT CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7575 2493 GUNFLINT COURT 254570070 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
250 ROGER KEMPA JR 2487 GUNFLINT CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2487 GUNFLINT COURT 254570080 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
251 LARRY G & CINDY A LOVIG 2475 GUNFLINT CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7575 2475 GUNFLINT COURT 254570090 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
252 THE LINDAHL LIVING TRUST 7264 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7264 BENT BOW TRAIL 254560040 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
253 MATTHEW STOCKMAN 7284 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7284 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570100 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
254 JOSEPH PAUL PLANK 7300 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7300 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570110 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
255 PETER H LINDER JR 7320 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7320 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570120 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
256 MARK L SCHWENDINGER 7334 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6402 7334 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570130 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
257 BRIAN D COOK 7348 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6402 7348 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570140 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
258 JAMES W ANDERSON 7376 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6402 7376 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570150 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
259 JASON JON KOENIG AND LAURIE MADISON KOEN 7398 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7398 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570160 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
260 GARY GRIEME 7428 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7428 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570170 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
261 ANDREW MALONE 7399 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7550 7399 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540020 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
262 MICHAEL P SMITHSON 7389 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7550 7389 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540010 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
263 RANDALL L CHRISTY TRUST 7377 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7550 7377 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254530380 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
264 JAMES W & STACIA L SPEIGHT 7361 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7550 7361 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254530370 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
265 BECKY R FAUSTGEN 7351 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7549 7351 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254530360 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
266 KURT W & MICHELLE K ODDSEN 7325 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7549 7325 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254530350 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
267 KIMBERLY SWITALSKI 2563 LONGACRES DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7553 2563 LONGACRES DRIVE 254530340 Access on Longacres Dr
268 DAVID E & CONNIE S MOORE 7330 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7549 7330 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254530130 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
269 DAVID MICHAEL KUCERA 2572 SOUTHERN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7547 2572 SOUTHERN COURT 254530140 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
270 MICHAEL T & MARY T K MAESER 2584 SOUTHERN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7547 2584 SOUTHERN COURT 254530150 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
271 ALEXANDR V YEVZELMAN 2596 SOUTHERN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7547 2596 SOUTHERN COURT 254530160 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
272 BRIAN K & KRISTIN M BUNKENBURG 2595 SOUTHERN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7547 2595 SOUTHERN COURT 254530170 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
273 GARY E ELLING 2585 SOUTHERN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2585 SOUTHERN COURT 254530180 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
274 GREGORY S & ERIN E KASSEBAUM 2575 SOUTHERN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7547 2575 SOUTHERN COURT 254530190 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
275 JOSEPH M & CHRISTINE M STARK 7400 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7551 7400 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540030 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
276 ROBERT P THORBUS 7406 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7406 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540040 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
277 JOSEPH PAUL ZORTMAN 7414 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7414 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540050 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
278 ADAM WELIVER 7424 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7424 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540060 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
279 THOMAS B & LAURA E PAPAS 7434 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7551 7434 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540070 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
280 KELLY F MCGINNIS 7444 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7551 7444 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540080 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
281 SARA E ISBELL CUNNINGHAM 7454 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7454 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540090 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
282 MATTHEW BATINICH 7460 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7460 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540100 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
283 JONATHAN WAATAJA 7476 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7476 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540110 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
284 JOSEPH W SILBERNAGEL 7492 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6400 7492 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540120 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
285 TRAVIS C HEGG 7508 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540130 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
286 MICHAEL G & DIANN M TAYLOR 7516 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6401 7516 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540140 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
287 COHOON REVOCABLE TRUST 400 DREAM CATCHER DR LEANDER, TX 78641-7525 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540150 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
288 MARK A & SARAH L PLETTS 7517 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6401 7517 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540160 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
289 JOHN E & KRISTIN M NYSTUL 7509 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6401 7509 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540170 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
290 STEVEN M & NANCY P HANOUSEK 7501 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6401 7501 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540180 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
291 JOHN E KREBSBACH 7487 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7487 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540190 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
292 HAO LI 7473 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6400 7473 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540200 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
293 ALLAN D & ELIZABETH D REDING 7457 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6400 7457 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540210 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
294 KHAI & HEATHER TRAN 7474 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7552 7474 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540220 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
295 NEAL R & NANCY J SIMON 7490 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7552 7490 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540230 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
296 PAULA M WARD REVOCABLE TRUST 7483 MOCCASIN TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7483 MOCCASIN TRAIL 254540250 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
297 BART JAY & REBECCA LYNN EDDY 7433 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6400 7433 BENT BOW TRAIL 254540260 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
298 TERRY L RADIL TRUST & KAREN FOSHOLDT RAD 7415 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570270 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
299 MICHAEL A MAZUTIS 7397 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6402 7397 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570260 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
300 DAVID M FRITZ 7385 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7385 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570250 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
301 JEFFREY J OTOLSKI 7371 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6402 7371 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570240 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
302 WALTER D KRUHOEFFER 7357 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7357 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570230 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
303 AARON H ALLEN 7343 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6402 7343 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570220 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
304 DAVID C & SUSAN L KIBLER 7329 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6402 7329 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570210 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
186
305 JESSICA M COSSALTER 7315 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7315 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570200 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
306 STEVEN C & ANNE R FORSLUND 7301 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6402 7301 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570190 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
307 THOMAS M & KATHLEEN M KUHL 7289 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7562 7289 BENT BOW TRAIL 254570180 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
308 KELLY MARIE EIDSMO BOWE 7269 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7562 7269 BENT BOW TRAIL 254560050 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
309 CANDI S MCGONAGILL TRUST AGREEMENT 2451 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2451 HUNTER DRIVE 258950150 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
310 PATRICK M & LISA L BRUNNER 2443 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8431 2443 HUNTER DRIVE 258950160 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
311 BETSY ELLEN DONALDSON 2435 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2435 HUNTER DRIVE 258950170 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
312 MICHAEL MUGGLI 2427 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2427 HUNTER DRIVE 258950180 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
313 JOSEPH E MYSS 2419 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8431 2419 HUNTER DRIVE 258950190 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
314 LEONIDAS & KRISTINE CHECHERIS 2411 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8431 2411 HUNTER DRIVE 258950200 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
315 KARLENE A JOHNSON 2403 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8431 2403 HUNTER DRIVE 258950210 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
316 BOBERTZ LIVING TRUST 2401 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8431 2401 HUNTER DRIVE 258950220 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
317 DEBRA L STAGE 2408 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8431 2408 HUNTER DRIVE 258950140 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
318 NICHOLAS HAGEN 2418 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8431 2418 HUNTER DRIVE 258950130 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
319 CHRISTOPHER & E GRETEL BROWN 2428 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8431 2428 HUNTER DRIVE 258950120 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
320 JARVIS C JONES 2438 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8431 2438 HUNTER DRIVE 258950110 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
321 AARON & KRISTINA BLOOMQUIST 2448 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8431 2448 HUNTER DRIVE 258950100 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
322 LAURA M KANTRUD 46417 285TH AVE VERGAS, MN 56587-2456 HUNTER DRIVE 258950090 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
323 SCOTT ENGEL 2398 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8428 2398 HUNTER DRIVE 258910010 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
324 TODD A & JENNIFER B FRIEDRICH 2384 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8428 2384 HUNTER DRIVE 258910020 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
325 JEFFREY E & MARY ANN O'NEIL 2370 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8428 2370 HUNTER DRIVE 258910030 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
326 OSCAR D ARANGO 2362 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2362 HUNTER DRIVE 258910040 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
327 JOSEPH JOHNSON 2350 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8428 2350 HUNTER DRIVE 258910050 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
328 MOLLY PATRICIA MAI 2342 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2342 HUNTER DRIVE 258910060 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
329 KANWARPREET SINGH DUA & CAROL MARY GREEN PO BOX 903 LONG LAKE, MN 55356-0903 2328 HUNTER DRIVE 258910070 1 $2,934.25 $458.59 OWNERSHIP CHANGE IN FEB 2022
330 SAMUEL B SAFFRIN 2314 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8428 2314 HUNTER DRIVE 258910080 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
331 PETER R OERTEL 2300 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2300 HUNTER DRIVE 258910090 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
332 RONALD G & MARGARET SLOMINSKI 2280 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8432 2280 HUNTER DRIVE 258910100 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
333 CHRISTOPHER STONE 7348 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7348 FAWN HILL ROAD 258910110 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
334 MICHAEL D & JANE E FELMLEE 7336 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7336 FAWN HILL ROAD 258910120 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
335 LARRY J & YOKO N STUEVE 7324 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7324 FAWN HILL ROAD 258910130 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
336 BRIAN J & BARBARA A KNUDSON 7312 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7312 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960010 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
337 DAVID D KOESTER 7290 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8435 7290 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960020 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
338 SUSAN M LOMBARDO REV TRUST 7278 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8435 7278 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960030 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
339 STEPHEN M & RENEE L PAWLYSHYN 7266 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8435 7266 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960040 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
340 CHRISTOPHER ANDRIS KAULS 7254 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8435 7254 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960050 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
341 JARED HEIDEN 7242 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7242 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960060 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
342 ERIC VANDENBRINK 7230 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7230 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960070 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
343 JENNIFER BUESGENS 7214 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7214 FAWN HILL ROAD 258970090 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
344 PATRICK & TERESA KOCOUREK 7200 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8435 7200 FAWN HILL ROAD 258970100 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
345 LORI DELLEFIELD DOYLE 7192 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8442 7192 FAWN HILL ROAD 258970110 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
346 AJAY ISRANI 7184 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7184 FAWN HILL ROAD 258970120 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
347 TODD A & SHYLA S ALLARD 7168 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8442 7168 FAWN HILL ROAD 258970130 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
348 MARK & ROBIN MULLEN 7201 LODGEPOLE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7564 7201 LODGEPOLE POINT 258970170 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
349 JOHN B COX 7215 LODGEPOLE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7215 LODGEPOLE POINT 258970180 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
350 FRANCIS MURPHY 7227 LODGEPOLE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7227 LODGEPOLE POINT 258970190 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
351 MATTHEW B HANSON 7235 LODGEPOLE POINT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7563 7235 LODGEPOLE POINT 258970200 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
352 STEVEN SALMI 7238 LODGEPOLE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7563 7238 LODGEPOLE POINT 258970210 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
353 MARK A ESCEN 7232 LODGEPOLE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7563 7232 LODGEPOLE POINT 258970220 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
354 JOHN D BREITLING 7224 LODGEPOLE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7224 LODGEPOLE POINT 258970230 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
355 JAMES A & KRISTIN M RUELLE 7200 LODGEPOLE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7563 7200 LODGEPOLE POINT 258970240 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
356 DANIEL P & KATHRYN J O'CONNOR 7124 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7566 7124 NORTHWOOD COURT 258970020 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
357 BRUCE A & JERILYN M KRAFT 7094 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7582 7094 NORTHWOOD COURT 258980010 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
358 CHRISTOPHER J LILLA 7074 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7074 NORTHWOOD COURT 258980020 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
359 STEVEN P & JODY K BUSKA 7054 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7582 7054 NORTHWOOD COURT 258980030 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
360 PATRICK DOUGLAS SIMMONS 7055 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7582 7055 NORTHWOOD COURT 258980040 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
361 PETER JOHN GARBERG 7075 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7582 7075 NORTHWOOD COURT 258980050 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
362 DAVID B ERICKSON 7095 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7582 7095 NORTHWOOD COURT 258980060 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
363 SCOTT CARL & KATHRYN M WOSJE 7125 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7566 7125 NORTHWOOD COURT 258970010 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
364 PETER SPARBY 7163 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7163 FAWN HILL ROAD 258970060 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
365 WADE OSBORNE 7175 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8443 7175 FAWN HILL ROAD 258970070 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
366 SPENCER C LADD 7187 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7187 FAWN HILL ROAD 258970080 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
367 THEODORE E & BRENDA L DARKOW 2198 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8436 2198 RED FOX CIRCLE 258960200 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
368 JONATHAN R SEPTER 2188 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8436 2188 RED FOX CIRCLE 258960190 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
369 SWALLOWTAIL VENTURES-CHANHASSEN LLC PO BOX 910 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0910 2178 RED FOX CIRCLE 258960180 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
370 MATTHEW CHAMBERS 2169 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8436 2169 RED FOX CIRCLE 258960170 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
371 ELIZABETH BARNES 2179 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2179 RED FOX CIRCLE 258960160 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
372 DANIEL ALDEN STODDARD 2189 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2189 RED FOX CIRCLE 258960150 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
373 ROBERT LESTER SHEEHAN 2199 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8436 2199 RED FOX CIRCLE 258960140 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
374 SHAWN YOU 7263 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8435 7263 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960130 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
375 TODD M & KAREN T BIMBERG 7275 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8435 7275 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960120 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
376 KERRY-JO K STEWART TRUST AGREEMENT 7287 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7287 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960110 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
377 BRADLEY G & ALISA L LACOMY 7301 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7301 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960100 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
378 TODD N & ANNE B JUTTING 7311 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7311 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960090 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
379 LE THU CA 7319 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7319 FAWN HILL ROAD 258960080 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
380 CHARLES E LOEFFLER II 7327 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7327 FAWN HILL ROAD 258910140 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
2022 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - LONGACRES AREA
12/31/2021
OWNER OWNER ADDRESS P.I.D.
STREET ASSESSMENT *ANNUAL
ASSMT
PAYMENTPROP.PROPERTY ASSMT STREET NOTES
NO.ADDRESS UNIT ASSMT
187
381 DAVID A EICKMEYER REV TRUST 7339 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7339 FAWN HILL ROAD 258910150 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
382 DARYOUSH GOLBAN 2232 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8432 2232 HUNTER DRIVE 258910160 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
383 MARK R & TANYA L ERICKSON 2216 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8432 2216 HUNTER DRIVE 258910170 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
384 LONGACRES HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC PO BOX 542 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0542 0 258910310
385 LONGACRES HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC PO BOX 542 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0542 2201 HUNTER DRIVE 258910320
386 MARTIN ZIELINSKI REV TRUST 2211 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8432 2211 HUNTER DRIVE 258910300 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
387 JACE SENSKE 2221 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2221 HUNTER DRIVE 258910290 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
388 CHRISTIAN D WHITE 2231 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2231 HUNTER DRIVE 258910280 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
389 ANDREW WERNER 2241 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2241 HUNTER DRIVE 258910270 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
390 JEFFERY S SIMON 2251 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2251 HUNTER DRIVE 258910260 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
391 THOMAS J & CAROL R BELL 7381 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7381 FAWN HILL ROAD 258910250 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
392 JOHN E ELVECROG 7411 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8430 7411 FAWN HILL ROAD 252790180 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
393 STUART REID 7423 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8430 7423 FAWN HILL ROAD 252790170 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
394 JULIE MARTIN BREW TRUST 7435 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8430 7435 FAWN HILL ROAD 252790160 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
395 DAVID FREEHAUF 7447 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7447 FAWN HILL ROAD 252790150 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
396 JON D & LAURA A TRANTHAM 7465 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8430 7465 FAWN HILL ROAD 252790140 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
397 JEFFREY D HAGEN 2319 FAWN HILL CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8437 2319 FAWN HILL COURT 252790130 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
398 MICHAEL & OLGA CARUSO 2331 FAWN HILL CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8437 2331 FAWN HILL COURT 252790120 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
399 TIMOTHY F PAINE 2345 FAWN HILL CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8437 2345 FAWN HILL COURT 252790110 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
400 RICHARD A GLOVER & GAY L PANKONIN GLOVER 2357 FAWN HILL CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2357 FAWN HILL COURT 252790100 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
401 JAMES P & MITRA L CALLAGHAN 2369 FAWN HILL CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8437 2369 FAWN HILL COURT 252790090 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
402 MICHAEL W & DEBRA M BENKOVICH 2362 FAWN HILL CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8437 2362 FAWN HILL COURT 252790080 1 $2,934.25 $458.59 402 & 403 ARE UNDER COMMON
OWNERSHIP AND CURRENTLY
UNDERGOING A LOT
CONSOLIDATION403MICHAEL W & DEBRA M BENKOVICH 2362 FAWN HILL CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8437 2356 FAWN HILL COURT 252790070
404 JUSTIN T MCMAHON 2350 FAWN HILL CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8437 2350 FAWN HILL COURT 252790060 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
405 JASON A KREBS & JULIANN E ROBEY REV TRUS 2338 FAWN HILL CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8437 2338 FAWN HILL COURT 252790050 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
406 CHARLES CHUVA PO BOX 984 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0984 2326 FAWN HILL COURT 252790040 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
407 MICHAEL G & MAUREEN HARLANDER 7442 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8430 7442 FAWN HILL ROAD 252790030 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
408 PETER M & DENISE E WESTERHAUS 7420 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8430 7420 FAWN HILL ROAD 252790020 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
409 JEREMY FARNAN 7408 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7408 FAWN HILL ROAD 252790010 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
410 THERESA R LUNDSTROM 7398 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7398 FAWN HILL ROAD 258910230 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
411 AMBER MCMILLAN 7392 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7392 FAWN HILL ROAD 258910240 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
412 MARCUS MATA 7368 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8429 7368 FAWN HILL ROAD 258910180 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
413 JEFFREY A & LISA M TRITCH 2313 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8428 2313 HUNTER DRIVE 258910181 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
414 CHRISTOPHER T MARTIN 2325 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8428 2325 HUNTER DRIVE 258910190 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
415 JOHANNES LOUWERS 2351 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8428 2351 HUNTER DRIVE 258910200 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
416 ANN MARGARET ALBERG 2373 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2373 HUNTER DRIVE 258910210 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
417 GREGORY PEDERSON 2395 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8428 2395 HUNTER DRIVE 258910220 1 $2,934.25 $458.59
Assessment Basis Unit 183.00 $536,968.05
Notes:
*Based on Interest Rate 2% Above Bonding Cost ( = 3.25% + 2.0% = 5.25%) and Term Equal to Bond Term ( = 8 Years).
2022 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - LONGACRES AREA
12/31/2021
OWNER OWNER ADDRESS P.I.D.
STREET ASSESSMENT *ANNUAL
ASSMT
PAYMENTPROP.PROPERTY ASSMT STREET NOTES
NO.ADDRESS UNIT ASSMT
188
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.PROJECT SCHEDULE / NEXT STEPS
2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project 0C1.125874/ C.P. 22-01 Page 14
VI.PROJECT SCHEDULE / NEXT STEPS
The City should be aware of the following steps and requirements necessary to meet the
requirements of MN Statute 429 that allows for a portion of the project costs to be assessed:
City Council to accept the Feasibility Study and call for an Improvement Hearing.
City Council to conduct an Improvement Hearing
City Council to order the improvements (by 4/5ths vote) within 6 months of the
Improvement Hearing.
City Engineer to design, advertise and open bids.
City Council to call for an Assessment Hearing.
City Council to conduct an Assessment Hearing. Final assessment roll must be formally
adopted.
City Council to award the project. The construction contract must be signed within 12
months of ordering the improvements.
Construction to occur (months of May to November).
City staff to certify final assessment roll with the County by November 30th.
The following project schedule shows the necessary steps along with a tentative date to complete.
January 24, 2022 Present Study to the City Council
February 14, 2022 Conduct Public Hearing, Order Improvements
February 2022 Complete final design and plan reviews/approvals
March 2022 Advertise and bid project
April 2022 Neighborhood Meeting
May 2022 Conduct Assessment Hearing
May 2022 Award project, construction contracts
June - October 2022 Construct project
November 2022 Project closeout
189
Appendix A: Figures
190
2
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 STONECREEKCOURTBRIDLE CREEK TRAIL
STONE CREEK ROADDRIV
E
BOUL
D
E
R
R
O
A
D
RENAISSANCE COUR
T
TIMBERWOOD DRIVEBRIDLE
GALPIN CO
U
R
T
CS
A
H
.
N
O
.
1
8GALPIN BOULEVARDSTONE CREEK LANE
W
E
S
T
STONE CREEK LAN
E
E
A
S
T
CR
E
E
K
CIRCLECHIC
A
G
O,
MIL
W
A
U
K
E
E,
S
T.
P
A
UL
A
N
D
P
A
CIFI
C
R
AIL
R
O
A
D
22
2 2
2 2
2
2
2
2
BC-P4.2B BC-P4.2A
BC-P4.3
D
D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>>>>>>
>
>
>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SS
S
S
S
S
S
SSS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>
D
D
D lllllllllllll
l
l
l l l l l
l
l
l
l l l l
l lllllllllllll l l llll
l l
l
l
l
l
l l l l l
l
l
l
l l l lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll>>>S >>S
D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3
3
3
4 4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
CREEKSTONE
Street_No
Street_No
2314 23002370
2260238222842272
23462360
2109
20012294203023322168
206323182304
2227 22308429
8430
2140
2126
2236 8429233323572321
2369
8426
20182034
8410
2050206620822239
2246 84092381
23422356
2275 2000
2345
2263 2251
2328
2374
2081
2154
8420
2193
2330
2093
2079
2259
2333
21812375
2065
2122
2334
2273
210821692287
2094
2338
2238 2224 20372210225220802157
20662266
2196
2145
202384412133
2214
2182
2121
2215
22228433 2019
2136
2361
2051
2337
2052
2317 2163
2318
2292
21512208
22202242
22662280
2321
2198
2127
2325
2162 2115
2326
22172231 2203
210321502245
2139
21862322
2254
2174
2329
2243
2255 2231
2267
2305 2301
22792291 2219
2309
2207
2313
2199
2187
2308 2175
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
H:\CHAN\0C1125874\CAD\C3D\FIGR-125874-FEASIBILITY STUDY.dwg 1/19/2022 10:57:44 AMR
2022 Street Rehabilitation
City of Chanhassen
Figure 1: Stone Creek Area Improvements
January 2022
R
FEETSCALE
0 120 240
HORZ.
ADD 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT SIGN
REPLACE GV
NO WM REPAIRS NOTED.
CONNECT DRAINTILE TO CB 2491 &
CB 2492. INSTALL CONNECTIONS
FOR 2321, 2328, 2333, 2342, 2345,
2356, 2357, 2369, 2370, 2381, AND
2382 STONE CREEK LANE WEST
CB 2492
CB 2491
CONNECT DRAINTILE TO CB 2737.
INSTALL CONNECTIONS FOR 2318,
2332, 2346, 2360, AND 2374 STONE
CREEK DRIVE
CB 2737
INSTALL STA SUMP MH W/ BAFFLE.
CB
2738
CONNECT DRAINTILE TO CB 2482.
INSTALL CONNECTIONS FOR 2162,
2174, 2186 AND 2198 BOULDER ROAD.
CB 2482
CB 1987
CB 1988
CB 1951
REMOVE AND REPLACE CB
1951, 1987, AND 1988 AND
ASSOCIATED STORM SEWER.
INSTALL DRAINTILE
CONNECTIONS FOR 2030
BOULDER ROAD AND
2063, 2081, 2109, AND
2121 STONE CREEK DRIVE.
INSTALL STA SUMP
CBMH W/ BAFFLE.
CB 2941
CB 2489
CONNECT DRAINTILE
TO CB 2489. INSTALL
CONNECTIONS FOR
2227 STONE CREEK
LANE EAST
INSTALL STA SUMP MH W/ BAFFLE.
REPLACE
PED RAMP.
REPLACE
PED RAMP.
OPTIONAL POND
GRADING &
MODIFICATIONS.
*STORM SEWER REPAIRS FOR THIS SHEET ARE BASED OFF
OF FIELD INSPECTIONS COMPLETED IN THE VICINITY.
PERCENTAGE BASED REPAIRS FOR THIS SHEET=
TOTAL STORM STRUCTURES ADJACENT TO ROADWAY - 44
REPLACE ADJUSTING RINGS - 19
STORM STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE - 12
REPLACE STORM STRUCTURE - 10
REPLACE
PED RAMP.
REESTABLISH
POND
EMERGENCY
OVERFLOW
PROPOSED FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION
PROPOSED FULL DEPTH RECONSTRUCTION
REMOVE CDS CENTER ISLAND (OPTIONAL)
SALVAGE FRAME, ADJUST FRAME, INSTALL LID
SALVAGE VALVE BOX, REBOLT GV
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MAINTENANCE
INJECTION GROUT
MH RECONSTRUCTION
REPLACE MH
REPLACE ADJUSTING RINGS
STORM STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE
REPLACE STORM STRUCTURE
LEGEND
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SANITARY SEWER POINT REPAIR
SANITARY SEWER PIPE REPLACEMENT
STORM SEWER REPLACEMENT
CURED IN PLACE PIPE LINING (CIPP)
DRAINTILE
CURB REPLACEMENT
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
SIDEWALK DIAMOND GRIND
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
>
l
>>
X
191
F
AW
N
H
I
L
L
R
O
A
D
FAW
N
H
I
L
L
C
O
U
R
T
TULIP COURTCROCUS COURTWINDMILL DRIVEBRINKER STREET
MAJESTIC WAY
PR
A
I
R
I
E
F
L
O
W
E
R
B
L
V
DGALPIN BLVDPAISL
E
Y
P
A
T
H
CLOVER COURT
WALNUT CURVE
1
1
1 6 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1 1
2
2222
2
2
2
2
2
BC-P1.6
BC-P3.1A
LU-P5.15
>>>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
S
S
S
S
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S S
S >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D
D
D
D
D
D llllllllllllllllllllll l
ll
ll
l
l l l l l l l l llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l l l llll >>>>S
D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1
6
6
6
6
7609
204521972133
7441
20722086
2150
2174
2101 74402117
7431742120602126
2149
21022200
755075647568
7545
7576758075847592759676007602
7541
20272091
21452159
2173
7511 7500
75107509
2187
7480
7495
74617476
74717470
2180
2198
7451
20852165
20432103
7521
7501
7508
2199
74967491
7490
74607475
757275887604
2059207521172131
7481
2181 2065
7598 7563
7587 7583
7579 7575 7571 7559
7591759576017599 7555
7551
7547
7567
7606
9
2 2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2 22222222
H:\CHAN\0C1125874\CAD\C3D\FIGR-125874-FEASIBILITY STUDY.dwg 1/19/2022 10:57:48 AMR
2022 Street Rehabilitation
City of Chanhassen
Figure 2: Brinker Area Improvements
January 2022
R
FEETSCALE
0 120 240
HORZ.
HUNTE
R
D
R
I
V
E
PED SAFETY CONCERNS
WILL BE REVIEWED W/ THE
GALPIN BLVD PROJECT
NO WM REPAIRS NOTED.
INSTALL STA SUMP MH W/ BAFFLE.
CB 1017
INSTALL STA SUMP MH W/ BAFFLE.
CB 1023
REPLACE
PED RAMP.
*STORM SEWER REPAIRS FOR THIS SHEET ARE BASED OFF
OF FIELD INSPECTIONS COMPLETED IN THE VICINITY.
PERCENTAGE BASED REPAIRS FOR THIS SHEET=
TOTAL STORM STRUCTURES ADJACENT TO ROADWAY - 26
REPLACE ADJUSTING RINGS - 12
STORM STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE - 7
REPLACE STORM STRUCTURE - 5
PROPOSED FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION
PROPOSED FULL DEPTH RECONSTRUCTION
REMOVE CDS CENTER ISLAND (OPTIONAL)
SALVAGE FRAME, ADJUST FRAME, INSTALL LID
SALVAGE VALVE BOX, REBOLT GV
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MAINTENANCE
INJECTION GROUT
MH RECONSTRUCTION
REPLACE MH
REPLACE ADJUSTING RINGS
STORM STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE
REPLACE STORM STRUCTURE
LEGEND
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SANITARY SEWER POINT REPAIR
SANITARY SEWER PIPE REPLACEMENT
STORM SEWER REPLACEMENT
CURED IN PLACE PIPE LINING (CIPP)
DRAINTILE
CURB REPLACEMENT
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
SIDEWALK DIAMOND GRIND
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
>
l
>>
X
GRADE AREA TO DRAIN.
192
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1 1
1
11
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
111
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1 1
ARRO
W
HE
A
D
COU
RT
HIGHOVER DRIVEHIGHCREST
C
IRCLECENTURYTRAILLO
N
G
A
C
R
E
S
D
R
I
V
EHILLSDALE COURT
GUNFLINT
TRA
ILGUNFLINT COURTARROWHEAD LANE
MOCCASIN TRAILBENT
B
O
W
T
R
A
I
L
BENT BOW
T
R
A
I
L
HUNTER DRI
V
E
T
H
4
1
H
A
Z
E
L
T
I
N
E
B
L
V
D
RIDGEVIEW POI
NT
RIDGE
VIE
W
W
AYVASSERMAN TRAILCEN
T
U
R
Y
B
L
V
D
SOUTHERNCOURT2
2
2
2
2
2 2 2
2
BC-P1.7B
BC-P1.10C
BC-P1.7C
BLUFF
CREEK
2-14-1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>S
S
S
S
SS
S
S
SS
S
S
S
S SS
SS
S
S
S S
S
S S S
S
S
S
S
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SS
S
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>||||
||
||
||
||
||||||||||>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>l
l
lL
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDl l l l
l l l l
llllll
l l l l l l lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l
llll
llllllllllllllllllllllll
l
llllllllllllllllllllllll
LL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
XX
MOCCASINTRAIL7321
72657275
7250
7270
7260
7298
7264
2484
72107256
2487
2493
7216
2476
7240
2475
2418
2438
7297
7275
2563
7320
7320
2408
2427
2428
7301
2443
7269
7264
2448
2451
2456
7315 7301
7300
2435
7289
7284
2411
7330
7460
7457
7444
7434
7424
7414
7433
7483
2585
2575
7399
7389
2584
7357
2572
7361
2403
7325
7334
2419
7474
7454
7490
2595 2596
2401
7343
7397
7376
7385
7371
7377 7351
7348
7329
7406
7428
7400
7415
7398
7517
7516
7509
7508
7501 7487
7473
7525
7492
7476
2398
2
2
2
2
22
22
2
2
2 2
2
2
2
2
22
2
2
2
2
H:\CHAN\0C1125874\CAD\C3D\FIGR-125874-FEASIBILITY STUDY.dwg 1/19/2022 10:57:53 AMR
2022 Street Rehabilitation
City of Chanhassen
Figure 3: Longacres Area Improvements
January 2022
RFEETSCALE
0 120 240
HORZ.
INSTALL STA SUMP MH W/ BAFFLE.
CB 874
CB 887
INSTALL STA SUMP MH W/ BAFFLE.
*STORM SEWER REPAIRS FOR THIS SHEET ARE BASED OFF
OF FIELD INSPECTIONS COMPLETED IN THE VICINITY.
PERCENTAGE BASED REPAIRS FOR THIS SHEET=
TOTAL STORM STRUCTURES ADJACENT TO ROADWAY - 42
REPLACE ADJUSTING RINGS - 18
STORM STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE - 11
REPLACE STORM STRUCTURE - 9
PROPOSED FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION
PROPOSED FULL DEPTH RECONSTRUCTION
REMOVE CDS CENTER ISLAND (OPTIONAL)
SALVAGE FRAME, ADJUST FRAME, INSTALL LID
SALVAGE VALVE BOX, REBOLT GV
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MAINTENANCE
INJECTION GROUT
MH RECONSTRUCTION
REPLACE MH
REPLACE ADJUSTING RINGS
STORM STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE
REPLACE STORM STRUCTURE
LEGEND
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SANITARY SEWER POINT REPAIR
SANITARY SEWER PIPE REPLACEMENT
STORM SEWER REPLACEMENT
CURED IN PLACE PIPE LINING (CIPP)
DRAINTILE
CURB REPLACEMENT
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
SIDEWALK DIAMOND GRIND
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
>
l
>>
X
193
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
6
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1FAWN HILL COURTTULIP COURT
CROCUS COURTBRINKER STREETMAJESTIC WAYCOU
N
T
Y
R
O
A
D
N
O
.
1
1
7
GALPIN BLVD
PAIS
LEY
PATHHARRISON HILL COURTHARRISO
N
H
I
L
L
T
R
A
I
L
RED FOX CIRCLELODGEP
O
L
E
P
O
I
N
T
WALNUT CURVENORTH
W
O
O
D
C
O
U
R
T
LONGA
CR
E
S
D
R
IV
E
2
2
2
22
2
2 2
2
2
2
LAKE
LUCY
2-8-1
LU-P5.8
BC-P1.5B
BC-P1.5A
BC-P1.10E >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SS
S
SSS
S
S
S
S
S
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SS
S
S
S
S SS
S
S
S
S
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S >>
>>>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>||
||
||||||||||>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDlllllllllll llllllllllllll l l
l llllll l lllllllllllllllllllll
l
l l l
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllll>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3
3
3
3
4 4
1
6
6
7095
2418
243824082428 2448
2456
7490
7447
7435
7442
7423
7420
7411
2350
2356
2362
7381
7398
7392
7368
2326
2338
7408 2313
2331
2357
2369
2345
2319
7465
7336
7324
7348
7319
2201
2211
2231
2241
2216
2232
7327
7311
2221
2251
7339
7275 72637287 2189
2179
7301
2328
2280
7312
2350
2370
7254
2362
2314
2300
2342
7290 7278 7266
7238
7242
7235
7232
2351
2325
2395
2373
2384
2398
7201
7230
7227
7214
7215
7200
7224
7200
7163
7192
7175
7184
7168
2169 2178
2188
2198
7187
2199
BC-P1.5C
BC-P1.10D
7124 7094
7074
7054
7055
7075
7125
FAWN HILL
ROAD
7
77
7
8
8
8
7
9
7
7
7 8 7
7
9
9
FAWN
HILL
ROAD
9
8 9
9
7 8
9
7 8
7 8
7
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
H:\CHAN\0C1125874\CAD\C3D\FIGR-125874-FEASIBILITY STUDY.dwg 1/19/2022 10:57:58 AMR
2022 Street Rehabilitation
City of Chanhassen
Figure 4: Longacres Area Improvements
January 2022
RFEETSCALE
0 120 240
HORZ.HUNTER DRIVEREMOVE CENTERLINE
STRIPE ON HUNTER DRIVE
ADD STOP SIGN AHEAD
TRIM TREES FOR
INTERSECTION
ADD STOP
AHEAD SIGN
CB 867 CB 866
INSTALL STA SUMP
MH W/ BAFFLE.
INSTALL STA SUMP MH W/ BAFFLE.
CB 856
CB 859
INSTALL STA SUMP MH W/BAFFLE.
CB 865
CB 210
CB 1458
INSTALL CONNECTIONS FOR 7095
AND 7125 NORTHWOOD COURT.
CB 1459
CB 858
CB 860
CB 862
CB 855
CB 854CB 853
CB 850 CB
851
CB 852
204
CB 849CB 394
131
130
CB 393
CB 392
CB 678
CB 677
CB 227CB 228
PROPOSED FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION
PROPOSED FULL DEPTH RECONSTRUCTION
REMOVE CDS CENTER ISLAND (OPTIONAL)
SALVAGE FRAME, ADJUST FRAME, INSTALL LID
SALVAGE VALVE BOX, REBOLT GV
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MAINTENANCE
INJECTION GROUT
MH RECONSTRUCTION
REPLACE MH
REPLACE ADJUSTING RINGS
STORM STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE
REPLACE STORM STRUCTURE
LEGEND
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SANITARY SEWER POINT REPAIR
SANITARY SEWER PIPE REPLACEMENT
STORM SEWER REPLACEMENT
CURED IN PLACE PIPE LINING (CIPP)
DRAINTILE
CURB REPLACEMENT
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
SIDEWALK DIAMOND GRIND
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
>
l
>>
X
STOP BAR
STOP
BAR
INSTALL MEDIAN NOSE
INSTALL MEDIAN NOSE
194
INSET A
FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION
2" MNDOT TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE (3,C)
-SPEC. 2360 MIX DESIGNATION SPWEA340C
TACK COAT
2" MNDOT TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE (3,C)
-SPEC. 2360 MIX DESIGNATION SPNWB330C
FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (FDR) BASE - SPEC. 2215
INPLACE SUBGRADE
VARIABLE DEPTH INPLACE AGGREGATE BASE
18" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE-SPEC. 2211 (OR RECLAIM-SPEC. 2215)
INPLACE SUBGRADE
RECLAMATION SOIL CORRECTION SECTION
TYPICAL STREET FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SECTION
15.5'15.5'
℄
SEE INSET A
EXISTING
CURB & GUTTER
CITY STANDARD PLATE 5233 - ALTERNATE 4"- 8"
SUB-SURFACE DRAINTILE. SEE ROADWAY AND
DRAINAGE PLANS FOR DRAINTILE LOCATIONS
OR AS DIRECTED BY INSPECTOR.
2%2%
EXISTING
CURB & GUTTER
EXISTING
GROUND
6" TOPSOIL AND
RESTORATION
EXISTING
GROUND
15.5'15.5'
℄
SEE INSET B
SURMOUNTABLE
CURB & GUTTER
2%2%
EXISTING
GROUND
6" TOPSOIL AND
RESTORATION
EXISTING
GROUND
1'DRAINTILE 1.5:1
INSET B
2" MNDOT TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE (3,C)
-SPEC. 2360 MIX DESIGNATION SPWEA340C
2" MNDOT TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE (3,C)
-SPEC. 2360 MIX DESIGNATION SPNWB330C
12" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (SPEC. 2211)
INPLACE SUBGRADE
24" SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL (SPEC. 2105)
TYPICAL STREET SECTION
FULL DEPTH RECONSTRUCTION
36" COMMON EXCAVATION
18" COMMON EXCAVATION
CUL DE SAC ISLAND RECONSTRUCTION
2" MNDOT TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE (3,C)
-SPEC. 2360 MIX DESIGNATION SPWEA340C
2" MNDOT TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE (3,C)
-SPEC. 2360 MIX DESIGNATION SPNWB330C
18" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (SPEC. 2211)
INPLACE SUBGRADE
18" COMMON EXCAVATION
6", 3" CLEAR AGGREGATE (SPEC. 2105)H:\CHAN\0C1125874\CAD\C3D\FIGR-125874-FEASIBILITY STUDY.dwg 1/19/2022 12:39:54 PMR
2022 Street Rehabilitation
City of Chanhassen
Figure 5: Typical Sections
January 2022
195
Appendix B: Preliminary Cost Estimates
196
2022 STREET REHABILITATION
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ITEM UNIT TOTAL TOTAL
NO.BID ITEM UNIT COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST
1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM $110,000.00 1.00 $110,000.00 0.11 $11,990.11 0.03 $2,828.65 0.01 $1,491.16 0.02 $1,792.56 0.24 $26,807.00 0.01 $1,225.73 0.04 $4,349.29 0.05 $5,137.33 0.02 $2,667.83
2 CLEAR & GRUB TREE TREE $385.00 47 $18,095.00 26 $10,010.00
3 SALVAGE VALVE BOX & REBOLT GATE VALVE EACH $3,200.00 120 $384,000.00 25 $80,000.00 36 $115,200.00
4 SALVAGE & REINSTALL PAVERS SQ FT $17.00 110 $1,870.00
5 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH $330.00 2 $660.00 1 $330.00
6 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $495.00 51 $25,245.00 7 $3,465.00 17 $8,415.00 1 $495.00
7 SALVAGE & ADJUST FRAME EACH $220.00 139 $30,580.00 27 $5,940.00 41 $9,020.00
8 SALVAGE & REINSTALL GAURDRAIL LIN FT $35.00 102 $3,570.00 102 $3,570.00
9 REPLACE ADJUSTING RINGS (STORM)EACH $700.00 57 $39,900.00 10 $7,000.00 17 $11,900.00
10 REMOVE SIGN EACH $55.00 7 $385.00
11 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH $1,500.00 6 $9,000.00 2 $3,000.00
12 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $550.00 8 $4,400.00 2 $1,100.00 3 $1,650.00
13 REMOVE CURB STOP BOX EACH $275.00 41 $11,275.00 9 $2,475.00 14 $3,850.00
14 REMOVE & REPLACE GV BOX SECTION LBS $11.00 1328 $14,608.00 316 $3,476.00 380 $4,180.00
15 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT $17.00 1541 $26,199.55 45 $767.55 378 $6,426.00
16 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT $17.00 144 $2,448.00
17 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT $6.00 6407 $38,442.00 669 $4,014.00 2014 $12,084.00
18 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE LIN FT $55.00 145 $7,966.75 109 $5,986.75
19 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD $2.75 252 $693.00 252 $693.00
20 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT $6.00 2227 $13,362.00 163 $978.00 2064 $12,384.00
21 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ FT $2.00 850 $1,700.00 50 $100.00 590 $1,180.00
22 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ FT $1.75 9647 $16,882.25 320 $560.00 8065 $14,113.75
23 DIAMOND GRIND SIDEWALK SQ FT $2.75 315 $866.25 315 $866.25
24 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CU YD $24.50 2605 $63,828.63 269 $6,584.38 1084 $26,558.00
25 EXCAVATION - COMMON CU YD $16.50 4957 $81,795.45 570 $9,406.65 1733 $28,594.50
26 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE CU YD $22.00 182 $4,004.00 11 $242.00 70 $1,540.00
27 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (CV)CU YD $33.00 182 $6,006.00 11 $363.00 70 $2,310.00
28 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (CV)CU YD $15.00 2795 $41,921.25 367 $5,505.00 873 $13,095.00 56 $843.75
29 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD $3.25 79013 $256,792.25 15438 $50,173.50 25516 $82,927.00
30 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) TON $80.00 9802 $784,160.00 1906 $152,460.00 3261 $260,860.00
31 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) TON $75.00 9802 $735,150.00 1906 $142,931.25 3261 $244,556.25
32 15" RC PIPE APRON EACH $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00
33 33" RC PIPE APRON EACH $1,925.00 1 $1,925.00 1 $1,925.00
34 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT $20.00 4599 $91,980.00 115 $2,300.00 300 $6,000.00 2107 $42,140.00 300 $6,000.00
35 CONNECT TO EXISTING PIPE DRAIN EACH $330.00 36 $11,880.00 26 $8,580.00
36 SUMP SERVICE CONNECTION BOX EACH $330.00 36 $11,880.00 26 $8,580.00
37 CURED IN PLACE PIPE LININIG (CIPP)LIN FT $55.00 704 $38,720.00
38 12" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT $55.00 605 $33,275.00 237 $13,035.00
39 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT $55.00 80 $4,400.00
40 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT $60.00 30 $1,800.00
41 21" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT $93.50 220 $20,570.00
42 24" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT $99.00 360 $35,640.00
43 27" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT $104.50 171 $17,869.50 111 $11,599.50
44 REESTABLISH POND EMERGENCY OVERFLOW LUMP SUM $15,000.00 1 $15,000.00 1 $15,000.00
45 BACK YARD GRADING LUMP SUM $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00
46 POND EXCAVATION CU YD $45.00 1293 $58,187.25 1293 $58,187.25
47 CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE LIN FT $200.00 145 $28,970.00 109 $21,770.00
48 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH $1,100.00 12 $13,200.00 10 $11,000.00
49 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH $1,100.00 2 $2,200.00
50 8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 LIN FT $77.00 147 $11,319.00
51 8"X6" PVC WYE EACH $385.00 2 $770.00
52 6" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPE LIN FT $55.00 30 $1,650.00
53 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MAINTENANCE EACH $2,200.00 12 $26,400.00 4 $8,800.00
54 INJECTION GROUT EACH $1,100.00 14 $15,400.00 10 $11,000.00
55 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RECONSTRUCTION EACH $2,750.00 1 $2,750.00 1 $2,750.00
56 SANITARY SEWER POINT REPAIR EACH $3,850.00 2 $7,700.00
57 HYDRANT EACH $3,000.00 6 $18,000.00 2 $6,000.00
58 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $2,200.00 8 $17,600.00 2 $4,400.00 3 $6,600.00
59 CURB STOP BOX EACH $825.00 41 $33,825.00 9 $7,425.00 14 $11,550.00
60 INSTALL LID EACH $275.00 139 $38,225.00 27 $7,425.00 41 $11,275.00
61 STORM STRUCTURE MAINTANENCE EACH $750.00 48 $36,000.00 7 $5,250.00 22 $16,500.00
62 CONSTRUCT OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE EACH $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00
63 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $2,200.00 40 $88,000.00 5 $11,000.00 14 $30,800.00
64 STANDARD SUMP MANHOLE W/BAFFLE EACH $8,000.00 10 $80,000.00 2 $16,000.00 3 $24,000.00
65 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH $770.00 10 $7,700.00 2 $1,540.00 2 $1,540.00
66 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH $775.00 88 $68,200.00 17 $13,175.00 35 $27,125.00
67 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CU YD $110.00 32 $3,520.00 14 $1,518.00
68 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ FT $16.50 900 $14,850.00 50 $825.00 590 $9,735.00
69 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY/TRAIL PAVEMENT SQ FT $5.75 12310 $70,782.50 320 $1,840.00 8065 $46,373.75 2265 $13,023.75
70 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT $8.25 1948 $16,071.00 63 $519.75 1885 $15,551.25
71 PEDESTRIAN RAMP EACH $3,300.00 9 $29,700.00 2 $6,600.00 7 $23,100.00
72 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN SURMOUNTABLE LIN FT $27.50 5783 $159,032.50 669 $18,397.50 2014 $55,385.00
73 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM $16,500.00 1.00 $16,500.00 0 $1,798.52 0.03 $424.30 0.01 $223.67 0.02 $268.88 0.24 $4,021.05 0.01 $183.86 0.04 $652.39 0.05 $770.60 0.02 $400.17
74 SIGN PANELS TYPE C EACH $220.00 3 $660.00 1 $220.00
75 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM $3,300.00 3 $9,900.00 1 $3,300.00 1 $3,300.00
76 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH $165.00 144 $23,760.00 25 $4,125.00 42 $6,930.00
78 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT $2.25 800 $1,800.00 200 $450.00 200 $450.00
79 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAW LIN FT $3.50 600 $2,100.00 200 $700.00 200 $700.00
80 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD $44.00 343 $15,092.00 38 $1,672.00 124 $5,456.00
81 HYDROMULCH W/SEED MIXTURE 25-151 SQ YD $5.50 1803 $9,916.50 221 $1,215.50 641 $3,525.50
82 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT - CAT 3 SQ YD $11.00 135 $1,485.00 135 $1,485.00
83 24" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT $16.50 31 $511.50
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST LESS PRORATED $3,845,022.13 $419,112.53 $98,876.00 $52,121.75 $62,657.55 $937,030.25 $42,845.00 $152,030.00 $179,573.50 $93,252.75
PRORATED PERCENTAGE 1.0000 0.109 0.026 0.014 0.016 0.244 0.011 0.040 0.047 0.024
PRORATED COSTS $126,500.00 $13,788.63 $3,252.95 $1,714.83 $2,061.44 $30,828.05 $1,409.59 $5,001.68 $5,907.93 $3,068.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS WITH PRORATED ITEMS $3,971,522.13 $432,901.15 $102,128.95 $53,836.58 $64,718.99 $967,858.30 $44,254.59 $157,031.68 $185,481.43 $96,320.75
+10% SOFT COST $397,152.21 $43,290.12 $10,212.89 $5,383.66 $6,471.90 $96,785.83 $4,425.46 $15,703.17 $18,548.14 $9,632.08
5% CONTINGENCY $192,251.11 $20,955.63 $4,943.80 $2,606.09 $3,132.88 $46,851.51 $2,142.25 $7,601.50 $8,978.68 $4,662.64
TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,560,925.44 $497,146.89 $117,285.64 $61,826.33 $74,323.77 $1,111,495.64 $50,822.30 $180,336.35 $213,008.25 $110,615.47
$750,582.64 $1,666,278.01
TOTAL STORM SEWER PROJECT COST $686,509.72
TOTAL WATERMAIN PROJECT COST $584,445.02
TOTAL STREET PROEJCT COST $2,906,935.35
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER PROJECT COST $228,292.58
TOTAL POND GRADING PROJECT COST $110,615.47
TOTAL CUL-DE-SAC PROJECT COST $44,127.31
WATERMAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER
STONE CREEK AREA TOTAL =BRINKER AREA TOTAL =
ROADWAY STORM SEWERROADWAY
BRINKER AREA IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
POND GRADING
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
STONE CREEK AREA IMPROVEMENTS
SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN
197
2022 STREET REHABILITATION
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ITEM UNIT TOTAL TOTAL
NO.BID ITEM UNIT COST QUANTITY COST
1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM $110,000.00 1.00 $110,000.00
2 CLEAR & GRUB TREE TREE $385.00 47 $18,095.00
3 SALVAGE VALVE BOX & REBOLT GATE VALVE EACH $3,200.00 120 $384,000.00
4 SALVAGE & REINSTALL PAVERS SQ FT $17.00 110 $1,870.00
5 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH $330.00 2 $660.00
6 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $495.00 51 $25,245.00
7 SALVAGE & ADJUST FRAME EACH $220.00 139 $30,580.00
8 SALVAGE & REINSTALL GAURDRAIL LIN FT $35.00 102 $3,570.00
9 REPLACE ADJUSTING RINGS (STORM)EACH $700.00 57 $39,900.00
10 REMOVE SIGN EACH $55.00 7 $385.00
11 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH $1,500.00 6 $9,000.00
12 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $550.00 8 $4,400.00
13 REMOVE CURB STOP BOX EACH $275.00 41 $11,275.00
14 REMOVE & REPLACE GV BOX SECTION LBS $11.00 1328 $14,608.00
15 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT $17.00 1541 $26,199.55
16 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT $17.00 144 $2,448.00
17 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT $6.00 6407 $38,442.00
18 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE LIN FT $55.00 145 $7,966.75
19 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD $2.75 252 $693.00
20 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT $6.00 2227 $13,362.00
21 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ FT $2.00 850 $1,700.00
22 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ FT $1.75 9647 $16,882.25
23 DIAMOND GRIND SIDEWALK SQ FT $2.75 315 $866.25
24 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CU YD $24.50 2605 $63,828.63
25 EXCAVATION - COMMON CU YD $16.50 4957 $81,795.45
26 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE CU YD $22.00 182 $4,004.00
27 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (CV)CU YD $33.00 182 $6,006.00
28 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (CV)CU YD $15.00 2795 $41,921.25
29 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD $3.25 79013 $256,792.25
30 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) TON $80.00 9802 $784,160.00
31 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) TON $75.00 9802 $735,150.00
32 15" RC PIPE APRON EACH $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00
33 33" RC PIPE APRON EACH $1,925.00 1 $1,925.00
34 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT $20.00 4599 $91,980.00
35 CONNECT TO EXISTING PIPE DRAIN EACH $330.00 36 $11,880.00
36 SUMP SERVICE CONNECTION BOX EACH $330.00 36 $11,880.00
37 CURED IN PLACE PIPE LININIG (CIPP)LIN FT $55.00 704 $38,720.00
38 12" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT $55.00 605 $33,275.00
39 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT $55.00 80 $4,400.00
40 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT $60.00 30 $1,800.00
41 21" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT $93.50 220 $20,570.00
42 24" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT $99.00 360 $35,640.00
43 27" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT $104.50 171 $17,869.50
44 REESTABLISH POND EMERGENCY OVERFLOW LUMP SUM $15,000.00 1 $15,000.00
45 BACK YARD GRADING LUMP SUM $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00
46 POND EXCAVATION CU YD $45.00 1293 $58,187.25
47 CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE LIN FT $200.00 145 $28,970.00
48 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH $1,100.00 12 $13,200.00
49 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH $1,100.00 2 $2,200.00
50 8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 LIN FT $77.00 147 $11,319.00
51 8"X6" PVC WYE EACH $385.00 2 $770.00
52 6" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPE LIN FT $55.00 30 $1,650.00
53 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MAINTENANCE EACH $2,200.00 12 $26,400.00
54 INJECTION GROUT EACH $1,100.00 14 $15,400.00
55 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RECONSTRUCTION EACH $2,750.00 1 $2,750.00
56 SANITARY SEWER POINT REPAIR EACH $3,850.00 2 $7,700.00
57 HYDRANT EACH $3,000.00 6 $18,000.00
58 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $2,200.00 8 $17,600.00
59 CURB STOP BOX EACH $825.00 41 $33,825.00
60 INSTALL LID EACH $275.00 139 $38,225.00
61 STORM STRUCTURE MAINTANENCE EACH $750.00 48 $36,000.00
62 CONSTRUCT OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE EACH $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00
63 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $2,200.00 40 $88,000.00
64 STANDARD SUMP MANHOLE W/BAFFLE EACH $8,000.00 10 $80,000.00
65 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH $770.00 10 $7,700.00
66 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH $775.00 88 $68,200.00
67 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CU YD $110.00 32 $3,520.00
68 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ FT $16.50 900 $14,850.00
69 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY/TRAIL PAVEMENT SQ FT $5.75 12310 $70,782.50
70 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT $8.25 1948 $16,071.00
71 PEDESTRIAN RAMP EACH $3,300.00 9 $29,700.00
72 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN SURMOUNTABLE LIN FT $27.50 5783 $159,032.50
73 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM $16,500.00 1.00 $16,500.00
74 SIGN PANELS TYPE C EACH $220.00 3 $660.00
75 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM $3,300.00 3 $9,900.00
76 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH $165.00 144 $23,760.00
78 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT $2.25 800 $1,800.00
79 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAW LIN FT $3.50 600 $2,100.00
80 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD $44.00 343 $15,092.00
81 HYDROMULCH W/SEED MIXTURE 25-151 SQ YD $5.50 1803 $9,916.50
82 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT - CAT 3 SQ YD $11.00 135 $1,485.00
83 24" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT $16.50 31 $511.50
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST LESS PRORATED $3,845,022.13
PRORATED PERCENTAGE 1.0000
PRORATED COSTS $126,500.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS WITH PRORATED ITEMS $3,971,522.13
+10% SOFT COST $397,152.21
5% CONTINGENCY $192,251.11
TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,560,925.44
TOTAL STORM SEWER PROJECT COST $686,509.72
TOTAL WATERMAIN PROJECT COST $584,445.02
TOTAL STREET PROEJCT COST $2,906,935.35
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER PROJECT COST $228,292.58
TOTAL POND GRADING PROJECT COST $110,615.47
TOTAL CUL-DE-SAC PROJECT COST $44,127.31
QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST
0.28 $31,312.16 0.01 $1,064.25 0.03 $2,789.05 0.06 $6,917.57 0.09 $9,627.31
21 $8,085.00
59 $188,800.00
110 $1,870.00
1 $330.00
26 $12,870.00
71 $15,620.00
30 $21,000.00
7 $385.00
4 $6,000.00
3 $1,650.00
18 $4,950.00
632 $6,952.00
1118 $19,006.00
144 $2,448.00
3100 $18,600.00 624 $3,744.00
36 $1,980.00
210 $420.00
1262 $2,208.50
1253 $30,686.25
2148 $35,443.65 506 $8,350.65
85 $1,870.00 16 $352.00
85 $2,805.00 16 $528.00
1197 $17,958.75 301 $4,518.75
38059 $123,691.75
4563 $365,040.00 73 $5,800.00
4563 $342,225.00 73 $5,437.50
1 $1,500.00
977 $19,540.00 800 $16,000.00
10 $3,300.00
10 $3,300.00
704 $38,720.00
368 $20,240.00
80 $4,400.00
30 $1,800.00
220 $20,570.00
360 $35,640.00
60 $6,270.00
36 $7,200.00
2 $2,200.00
2 $2,200.00
147 $11,319.00
2 $770.00
30 $1,650.00
4 $8,800.00 4 $8,800.00
2 $2,200.00 2 $2,200.00
2 $7,700.00
4 $12,000.00
3 $6,600.00
18 $14,850.00
71 $19,525.00
19 $14,250.00
21 $46,200.00
5 $40,000.00
6 $4,620.00
36 $27,900.00
18 $2,002.00
260 $4,290.00
1660 $9,545.00
3100 $85,250.00
0.28 $4,696.82 0.01 $159.64 0.03 $418.36 0.06 $1,037.64 0.09 $1,444.10
2 $440.00
1 $3,300.00
77 $12,705.00
400 $900.00
200 $700.00
181 $7,964.00
941 $5,175.50
31 $511.50
$1,094,506.90 $37,200.90 $97,492.00 $241,802.00 $336,521.00
0.285 0.010 0.025 0.063 0.088
$36,008.98 $1,223.89 $3,207.41 $7,955.21 $11,071.41
$1,130,515.88 $38,424.79 $100,699.41 $249,757.21 $347,592.41
$113,051.59 $3,842.48 $10,069.94 $24,975.72 $34,759.24
$54,725.35 $1,860.05 $4,874.60 $12,090.10 $16,826.05
$1,298,292.82 $44,127.31 $115,643.95 $286,823.03 $399,177.70
$2,144,064.80LONGACRES AREA TOTAL =
CUL DE SAC ISLANDS WATERMAIN STORM SEWERROADWAY
LONGACRES AREA IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
SANITARY SEWER
198
Appendix C: City Assessment Practice
NOTE: Assessment Policy being considered for review and update at 1/24/2022 City Council
meeting. None of the contemplated modifications affect the 40% assessment methodology.
199
g:\eng\forms\assessments\assessment practice 111814.doc
This Assessment Practice is intended to provide general direction to City Staff in preparation of assessment rolls
to ensure fair and consistent treatment of all properties within the City of Chanhassen. This practice may not
apply in all circumstances at which time the Council will direct staff to determine an alternate assessment
methodology. All benefiting properties that have access or potential future access to the street proposed to be
Reconstructed or Rehabilitated shall be included in the assessment roll. Assessments must be equally
distributed between housing types. Commercial properties will typically be assessed using an area charge or in
some circumstances front footage.
NEW CONSTRUCTION: 100% assessed to benefitting properties
Assessable Costs Include:
• Construction of a new street – Typically not a City project.
• Installation of water main, storm sewer and sanitary sewer systems where it did not previously exist.
RECONSTRUCTION: 40% assessed to all benefitting properties
Assessable Costs Include:
• Reconstruction of an existing street.
• Installation or repair of concrete curb and gutter associated with a street reconstruction project.
Notes:
• If a residential property benefits from a collector or commercial street reconstruction project, the
assessment amount for the residential property shall be based on a 31-foot wide street.
• Replacement or repair of an existing water main, storm sewer and sanitary sewer will not be assessed to
the benefitting properties. The City will pay 100% of these improvement costs out of the associated
enterprise fund.
REHABILITATION: 40% assessed to all benefitting properties
Assessable Costs Include:
• Edge or full-depth mill and overlay, cracksealing and full-depth repair of problem areas within the street
rehabilitation project area, installation or repair of curb and gutter.
• Replacement or repair of existing water main, storm sewer and sanitary sewer will not be assessed to the
benefitting properties. The City will pay 100% of these improvement costs out of the associated
enterprise fund.
Notes:
• If a residential property benefits from a collector or commercial street rehabilitation project, the
assessment amount for the residential property shall be based on a 31-foot wide street.
ASSESSMENT PAYMENT OPTIONS
• Term for Reconstruction projects shall be 10 years.
• Term for Rehabilitation projects shall be 8 years.
• The interest rate of the assessment projects shall be the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (at the date of the
assessment hearing) plus 2%.
REGULAR MAINTENANCE: Properties are not assessed
• Projects Include: Pothole filling, Patching, Cracksealing, Sealcoating
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT PRACTICE Updated November, 2014
200
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: February 14, 2022 RESOLUTION NO:2022-XX
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS & AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
2022 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 22-01
WHEREAS,on January 24, 2022, the City Council received the feasibility report and called for
the public hearing to be held on February 14, 2022 for the 2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project
No. 22-01. The project includes street, drainage, and utility system improvements to Majestic Way,
Windmill Drive, Walnut Curve, Brinker Street, Crocus Court, Tulip Court, Stone Creek Ln W, Stone
Creek Ln E, Stone Creek Road, Stone Creek Court, Boulder Road, Stone Creek Drive Galpin Blvd
to 250 feet east of Boulder Road, Hillsdale Court, Gunflint Court, Gunflint Trail from Longacres
Drive to 150 feet north of Gunflint Court, Moccasin Trail, Southern Court, Bent Bow Trail, Hunter
Drive, Fawn Hill Court, Fawn Hill Road from Longacres Drive to 225 feet south of Fawn Hill Court,
Red Fox Circle, Lodgepole Point, Northwood Court; and
WHEREAS,a minimum of ten (10) days’ mailed noticed and two (2) weeks’ published notice
of the public hearing was given; and
WHEREAS,the public hearing was held thereon the 14th day of February, 2022, in the Council
Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, at which all persons desiring to be heard
were given an opportunity to be heard thereon,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe Chanhassen City Council:
1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the project’s
Feasibility Study.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted October 25,
2021.
3. The Council authorizes preparation of plans and specifications for the 2022 City Pavement
Rehabilitation Project No. 22-01.
4. The Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from
the proceeds of tax exempt bonds.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 14th day of February, 2022.
ATTEST:
Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
201
Capital Improvement Program
City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley
2022 2026
thru Department Street Improvements
Description
Annual project to rehabilitate and/or reconstruct streets in the City. The 5 year Capital Pavement Management Plan identifies the planned streets
for the next five years. The Plan is updated every fall to review priorities and needs, but generally intends to keep the overall condition index (OCI)
average across all streets at 70 or higher.
Project #ST-012
Priority n/a
Justification
The City uses a Pavement Management System in Cartegraph to monitor the condition of the City streets. While proper preventative maintenance
extends the life of the street and is cost effective, a street will eventually deteriorate to a point that major maintenance is required. Rehabilitation
projects extend the life of the street. In cases when utilities or poor sub grade needs to be replaced or where streets have deteriorated to a point
where rehabilitation will no longer be practical, reconstruction of the street is necessary. A feasibility study is written to consider the merits of the
project, scope of work, costs and assessments.
Budget Impact/Other
The City has an Assessment Policy, last updated in 2014, that identifies what and how much of the project is assessed to benefiting properties.
Useful Life Unassigned
Project Name Pavement Management Program (PMP)Category Street Improvements
Type Improvement
Account #2
Account #1 601-6xxx-4xxx
Account #4
Account #3
Status Active
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Expenditures
27,325,0005,075,000 5,225,000 5,475,000 5,675,000 5,875,000Construction
5,075,000 5,225,000 5,475,000 5,675,000 5,875,000 27,325,000Total
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Funding Sources
8,380,0001,560,000 1,600,000 1,680,000 1,740,000 1,800,000Streets - PMP Assessments
12,570,0002,340,000 2,400,000 2,520,000 2,610,000 2,700,000Streets - PMP Funds
1,225,000225,000 235,000 245,000 255,000 265,000Utility Fund -Sewer
2,650,000500,000 520,000 540,000 560,000 530,000Utility Fund -Surface Wtr
2,500,000450,000 470,000 490,000 510,000 580,000Utility Fund -Water
5,075,000 5,225,000 5,475,000 5,675,000 5,875,000 27,325,000Total
202
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item Resolution 2022-XX: Approve Joint Powers and Turnback Agreements with
Carver County for the Galpin Boulevard Improvement Project
File No.ENG: PW176a Item No: H.1
Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution approving the Joint Powers Agreement and
Turnback Agreement with Carver County for the Galpin Boulevard Improvement Project."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
Consider approving both a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) and a Turnback Agreement with Caver
County as part of the planned Galpin Boulevard Improvement Project. The County Board will also
consider these agreements at their next available Board meeting.
Staff will give a short presentation at the Council meeting as a way to help support public
communication for this highly anticipated project.
BACKGROUND
As part of the planned Galpin Boulevard Improvement Project, the County is transferring jurisdiction of
the road to the City, commonly known as a "Turnback". This action requires an agreement between the
City and County.
203
The JPA defines the responsibilities and cost splits of each party for the implementation of the
improvement project, which is being led by the City.
A preliminary design was performed in 2018 which resulted in the development of a feasibility study
(attached) including a preferred project layout along with a cost estimate. Public outreach was
conducted as part of that preliminary design exercise.
DISCUSSION
The City has prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP) for design services related to the project. Proposals
are due on February 16, 2022 in anticipation of recommending a consultant selection at the February 28,
2022 Council meeting.
Design phase will commence immediately with the intent to solicit bids in January of 2023 for
construction to begin in the spring of 2023. Part of the design phase will be to hold public outreach
meetings focusing on traffic safety and multi-model characteristics of the corridor.
The general scope is a full roadway reconstruction including adding turn lanes, intersection
improvements, soil corrections, adding curb/gutter, stormwater management, public sewer/water,
landscaping and lighting. Multi-use trails will be reconstructed and extended north to the City limits.
Based on the ultimate utility improvement scope, the construction may have to occur over two seasons,
meaning the project has the potential to be built in phases, 2023 and 2024. This has not been fully
vetted and will be one of the initial critical design elements.
There are five single-family residential properties north of Lake Lucy Road, on the east side of Galpin
Boulevard, that do not have public sewer available at their property. Part of the design will be to
determine the feasibility of extending sewer to these properties with this project. Should that be the
case, private property assessments will be used for these benefitting properties. Outside of the sewer
extension for these properties, no other assessments will be utilized for this project as the County does
not assess for roadway improvements on County Roads.
Once the project is completed, all routine and future maintenance of the roadway corridor will be the
responsibility of the City.
BUDGET
The overall project cost is estimated at $11.25M.
The project is identified in the City's 5-Year CIP as Project No. ST-040 (sheet attached).
The general cost breakdown of the project is as follows per the attached JPA:
204
Item Responsibility
Roadway & Stormwater County (75%)
City (25%)
Public Utilities - Water City (100%)
Public Utilities - Sanitary Sewer City (100%)
Right of Way County (50%)
City (50%)
The cost split was generally derived by the County's standard Cost Participation Policy; however,
adjustments were negotiated to account for project-specific elements, including the fact that this is a
Turnback.
The overall cost for the City is estimated at $4.0M and is currently fully funded.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution and Agreements.
ATTACHMENTS
CIP Project No ST-040
Galpin Feasibility Report 08_13_18
City Resolution Turnback CR117
Turnback Agreement
JPA
205
Capital Improvement Program
City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley
2022 2026
thru Department Street Improvements
Description
The project will reconstruct Galpin Blvd from 78th Street north to the City limits. The street is proposed to have geometric improvements made to
conform to current design standards and urbanized to have concrete curb and gutter. Turn lanes will be constructed and trail improvements made.
This section of Galpin Blvd is on Carver County's turnback list for roadways to be jurisdictionally transferred to the local agency. Once Galpin
Blvd is reconstructed the City would be responsible for operations and future maintenance.
Project #ST-040
Priority n/a
Justification
The pavement of Galpin Blvd has reached its life expectancy. The roadway at this time should be reconstructed and designed to current standards.
The project is also planned for growth in the area.
Budget Impact/Other
The project will require the City to have operational and maintenance over this section of Galpin Blvd.
Useful LifeProject Name MSA-Galpin Blvd Imp (Hwy 5 N to City limits)Category Street Improvements
Type Improvement
Account #2
Account #1 601-6040-4751
Account #4
Account #3
Status Active
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Expenditures
11,250,0005,625,000 5,625,000Construction
5,625,000 5,625,000 11,250,000Total
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Funding Sources
7,000,0003,500,000 3,500,000Streets - Other Agency
Funding
3,000,0001,500,000 1,500,000Streets - PMP MSA Funds
250,000125,000 125,000Utility Fund -Sewer
1,000,000500,000 500,000Utility Fund -Water
5,625,000 5,625,000 11,250,000Total
206
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
Preliminary Design Study
TH 5 to North City Limits
CITY OF CHAHASSEN AND CARVER COUNTY
CITY PROJECT PW176A
AUGUST 2018
Prepared By:
207
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
Studied Improvements .................................................................................................................. 1
Public Involvement Summary ....................................................................................................... 3
Estimated Costs and Funding ....................................................................................................... 3
Project Schedule ........................................................................................................................... 4
Appendicies
Appendix A – Project Location Map
Appendix B – Existing Conditions Layout
Appendix C – Traffic Memorandum
Appendix D – Potential Underpass Plan
Appendix E – Geotechnical Report
Appendix F – Preferred Layout and Profile
Appendix G – Proposed Drainage Plan
Appendix H – Estimated Costs and Funding
208
1 Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
INTRODUCTION
On November 13, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley-Horn
and Associates to assist the City in preparing a preliminary design study for Galpin Boulevard between
Trunk Highway (TH) 5 and the north City limits. Galpin Boulevard is currently a 4-lane urban section
roadway between TH 5 and West 78th Street and a 2-lane rural section roadway north of West 78th Street.
A project location map is provided in Appendix A and a layout detailing the existing conditions is provided
in Appendix B.
Carver County currently operates and maintains Galpin Boulevard; however, the County has identified
this section of Galpin Boulevard as a potential turnback since it functions more as a local collector
roadway than a County roadway. This study has included the following tasks to assist the City and
County in evaluating the potential turnback of the roadway:
• A public involvement process to inform stakeholders and gather input
• A study of existing and future traffic operations
• An evaluation of potential improvements to address safety and operational concerns
• An investigation of potential bicycle and pedestrian improvements
• Determination of a preferred layout and profile
• Development of a proposed storm drainage plan
• Determination of estimated costs and a funding plan
The improvements to Galpin Boulevard are current programmed for construction in 2022. This study was
completed well in advance of construction to allow the City and County to better plan for future
development along the corridor and to develop a funding plan for the proposed improvements.
A Project Management Team (PMT) consisting of staff from the City of Chanhassen and Carver County
worked cooperatively to determine the proposed scope of the project improvements. This report
summarizes the findings and direction of the PMT, details the scope of the proposed improvements, and
establishes estimated costs and a proposed cost share plan for the improvements.
STUDIED IMPROVEMENTS
The investigation of potential of improvements along the corridor included a traffic forecasting and
operations analysis. The analysis included a study of the overall corridor and the following intersections:
• TH 5 (currently a traffic signal)
• West 78th Street (currently stop control on West 78th Street)
• Brinker Street (currently a three-way stop)
• Longacres Drive (currently stop control on Longacres Drive)
• Lake Lucy Road (currently a four-way stop)
• Pheasant Drive (currently stop control on Pheasant Drive)
A memorandum summarizing the results of the traffic analysis is provided in Appendix C.
The traffic analysis determined that the current roadway configuration with existing intersection control will
function at an acceptable level of service for both existing and future design year (2040) traffic volumes;
however, intersection improvements would be beneficial at some locations to address operational and
safety concerns. The specific intersections of concern are West 78th Street, Brinker Street, and Lake Lucy
Road. The preliminary design work identified potential improvements at these intersections as follows:
• West 78th Street - It is recommended that a roundabout be constructed at this location
209
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
2
• Brinker Street - It is recommended that the existing three-way stop be replaced with either an
enhanced pedestrian crossing with stop control on Brinker Street or with a mini-roundabout
• Lake Lucy Road - It is recommended that the existing four-way stop be replaced by either an
enhanced pedestrian crossing with stop control on Lake Lucy Road or with a mini-roundabout
Based on technical analysis and input received as a part of the public involvement process, it is
recommended that mini-roundabouts be constructed at Brinker Street and Lake Lucy Road.
The preliminary design work has also investigated the need for sidewalk and trail improvements along the
corridor. The proposed design includes 10-foot wide trails along both sides of the roadway between TH 5
and Lake Lucy Road, and a 10-foot wide trail along the east side of the roadway north of Lake Lucy
Road. Right-of-way limitations and physical constraints make it difficult to include trails along both sides of
the roadway north of Lake Lucy Road. A trail on the east side of Galpin Boulevard would connect to a
future City of Shorewood trail that will run along the east side of the roadway from the Chanhassen City
limits to TH 7. The possible construction of a pedestrian underpass crossing of Galpin Boulevard was
also investigated between Hunter Drive and Longacres Drive. Preliminary design information for the
underpass is provided in Appendix D. The underpass was found to be difficult and expensive to construct
considering topographic and right-of-way limitations.
Galpin Boulevard is proposed to be reconstructed to an urban section roadway, requiring storm drainage
improvements including storm sewer and storm water treatment facilities. The preliminary design work
identified 4 potential locations for the storm water treatment facilities. One of the facilities would be built
on City property at Sugar Bush Park, while the other 3 locations will require easement dedication or
acquisition. The southerly portion of the project area falls within the boundaries of the Riley Purgatory
Bluff Creek Watershed District, while the northern portion of the project is within the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District. The proposed storm drainage improvements must meet the requirements of the
respective watershed districts.
The project area includes pending development of the Prince R. Nelson property along the east side of
Galpin Boulevard between West 78th Street and Lake Lucy Road. The proposed development plans will
need to include the dedication of an additional 17 feet or right-of-way along the westerly edge of the
property to provide for the future reconstruction of Galpin Boulevard. In addition, drainage and utility
easements are needed for two proposed storm drainage facilities on the property. The proposed drainage
plan in Appendix G details the suggested locations for the drainage facilities; however, their exact
locations can be somewhat flexible based on the development plans.
The City has investigated the potential burial of existing overhead utilities along the project corridor. Xcel
Energy has provided a preliminary cost of $1,294,000 for the burial work based on some general
assumptions. More detailed analysis will be required at the time of the Galpin Boulevard final design
work to refine the estimated costs. Some of the overhead utility burial work along the Prince R. Nelson
property may occur in conjunction with the proposed development.
This study did not include an evaluation of the need to relocate or replace public utilities, and no
estimated costs have been identified for public utility relocation/replacement. The future final design
process will need to determine whether public utility improvements are needed.
A preliminary geotechnical exploration program was completed as a part of the preliminary design work.
A report summarizing the results of the geotechnical investigation is provided in Appendix E.
The preferred layout and profile for Galpin Boulevard is provided in Appendix F. The proposed drainage
plan is provided in Appendix G.
210
3 Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY
A public involvement process was implemented as a part of the preliminary design process to inform the
area stakeholders and gather input on the proposed design. The following is a summary of the public
involvement activities:
Public Open House #1
Public Open House #1 was held on March 22, 2018 at the Chanhassen Rec Center. The meeting was
attended by over 35 residents and 10 comment cards were received. The feedback on the project was
generally very positive with support for changes at the West 78th Street, Brinker Street, and Lake Lucy
Road intersections. The proposed trail improvements were also viewed as very favorable. Residents
requested that the existing horizontal and vertical alignment challenges at the north end of the corridor
near Melody Hill Circle be improved as a part of the project.
Public Open House #2
Public Open House #2 was held on June 12, 2018 at the Chanhassen Rec Center. The meeting was
attended by over 45 residents and 16 comment cards were received. The feedback on the proposed
improvements was generally positive. There was support for the construction of a roundabout at West
78th Street and mini-roundabouts were supported over enhanced pedestrian crossings at Brinker Street
and Lake Lucy Road. The proposed trail improvements were also supported by residents.
Input from the Chanhassen City Council was received at work sessions on February 26, 2018, and May
29, 2018. The project was reviewed with the Carver County Board on June 5, 2018. The Chanhassen
City Council adopted a resolution in support of the feasibility study findings on June 25, 2018.
ESTIMATED COSTS AND FUNDING
The estimated costs for the Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements project are summarized below and
detailed in the table provided in Appendix H. The estimated costs include a 10% contingency and 4%
escalation for the planned 2022 construction year. Planning/design costs have been estimated at 20% of
the construction cost.
Estimated Construction Cost $ 6,930,000
Contingency $ 690,000
Escalation for 2022 Construction $ 300,000
Right-of-Way/Easements $ 400,000
Indirect Costs $ 1,670,000
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 9,990,000
A proposed cost sharing plan has been developed based on Carver County’s current cost sharing policy
and additional clarification/direction provided by County staff. Based on the current policy, the City of
Chanhassen’s cost share for the project would be approximately $3.1 million as detailed in Appendix H.
The City and County will need to agree upon a final cost share split and a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA)
will be needed between the City and County detailing the turnback terms.
Estimated total project costs for the optional pedestrian underpass and overhead utility burial
improvements are as follows:
Pedestrian Underpass $ 2,600,000
Overhead Utility Burial $ 1,294,000
211
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
4
PROJECT SCHEDULE
A proposed project schedule is summarized below assuming that the improvements are constructed in
2022 as currently programmed.
Feasibility Study and Preliminary Design Complete July 2018
Final Design 2020*
Right-of-Way/Easement Acquisition 2021*
Bidding Winter 2021/2022
Begin Construction 2022*
*Contingent on City and County agreement on a funding plan for the improvements
212
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
APPENDICIES
APPENDIX A – PROJECT LOCATION MAP
213
W 78TH ST
BRINKER ST
LONGA
R
E
S
D
R
LAKE LUCY RD
P
H
E
A
S
A
N
T
D
R
LAKE
ANN
LAKE
LUCY
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
GALPIN BOULEVARD (CR 117)
RECONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
LOCATION
CARVER
COUNTY
214
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
APPENDIX B – EXISTING CONDITIONS LAYOUT
215
MAJESTIC WAY HUNTER DRLONGARES DRRDTOPAZ DR HARRISONLAKELAKE LUCY RD
PINEHURST DR
CRESTVIEW DR
W 65TH STWHITETAIL RIDGE CTMELODY HILL RD
P
H
E
A
S
A
N
T
D
R GALPIN BLVD (CR 117) W 78TH STWALNUT CURVEBRINKER ST
GALPIN BOULEVARD (CR 117)RECONSTRUCTIONEXISTING CONDITIONSCARVERCOUNTYNORTH216
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
APPENDIX C – TRAFFIC MEMORANDUM
217
MEMORANDUM
To: Paul Oehme, P.E.
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
City of Chanhassen
Darin Mielke, P.E., LSIT, PMP
Assistant Public Works Director / Deputy County Engineer
Carver County Public Works
Dan McCormick, P.E., PTOE
Transportation Manager
Carver County Public Works
From: Brandon Bourdon, P.E.
Douglas Arnold, P.E.
Date: March 8, 2018
Re: Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Reconstruction
Corridor Safety and Operations Analysis
Introduction
Carver County is proposing to turn back Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) to the City of Chanhassen from Trunk
Highway (TH) 5 to the northern City limit. As part of the turnback process, Kimley-Horn performed a traffic
analysis to determine existing and future operating conditions of the corridor, and determine if any
roadway/intersection improvements should be made as a part of the corridor reconstruction that will
occur prior to turn back to the City.
This memorandum provides a summary of historic crash data along the study corridor, intersection
capacity analysis for Existing and Design Year conditions, and a discussion on potential roadway and
intersection improvement alternatives. This memo uses traffic forecasts documented in the Traffic
Forecasting Memorandum dated January 4, 2018 (see Appendix).
218
Page 2
Existing Conditions Analysis
The segment of Galpin Boulevard that was the focus of this corridor analysis is between TH 5 and the
northern city limit. Based on discussion with City and County staff, the following intersections along Galpin
Boulevard were the focus of the traffic analysis; TH 5, W 78th Street, Brinker Street, Longacres Drive, Lake
Lucy Road, and Pheasant Drive.
Roadway Conditions
Galpin Boulevard is a north-south roadway that connects Lyman Boulevard (to the south) with TH 7 (to
the north), located between Hazeltine Boulevard (to the west) and Powers Boulevard (to the east). The
approximately 2-mile study corridor begins at TH 5 and ends at the City of Chanhassen’s northern border.
Galpin Boulevard currently has a posted speed limit of 45 mph on the south end (south of Lake Lucy Drive)
and 40 mph on the north end. Galpin Boulevard is currently a two-lane undivided roadway that is classified
as a Major Collector within the study limits in Carver County’s Comprehensive Plan. Exhibit 1 provides the
existing lane geometry and intersection control for the study area.
Existing Traffic Volumes
The existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is 5,300 vehicles per day (vpd) south of TH 5, 8,700 vpd between
W 78th Street and TH 5, 4,350 vpd between Longacres Drive and W 78th Street, 2,700 vehicles per day
between Lake Lucy Road and Longacres Drive, and 2,450 vehicles per day north of Lake Lucy Road. Exhibit
2 provides the ADT volumes along the study corridor.
The Traffic Volume Forecasting Memorandum included in the Appendix provides information regarding
the collection of existing turning movement volumes at the study intersections. This data was collected in
December 2017. Exhibit 2 provides the intersection turning movement counts for the AM and PM peak
hours.
219
NOT TO SCALENOTNOT NOTNOTNNNNOT NOTOOT OONONONONOTNOTNOT OT NOTONOTNOTNNOT NOTNOT NOOOTNOTTTNNTNONOTNOTNOTTOONONONOOTNNOTOT OTT T OTTTNNOTTTTTTOTTNNNT TO STO STOTO STO STO SOSOSOSTO STO TO STO SOSTO STOOSOSOOSSTO SSTTTTTSSSCALCALECALECALECALCCALECALECALELCALCALCALCALECALELALELCALECACALEAACCALCALECCC
LEGEND
Study Intersections
Existing Signal Control
Existing Stop Control
Channelized Right Turn
W 65th StreetW 65th Street
Melody Hill Melody Hill
RoadRoad
Brinker StreetBrinker Street
Hunter DriveHunter Drive
Majestic WayMajestic Way
Longacres DriveLongacres Drive
Wynsong LaneWynsong Lane
Lake Harrison Lake Harrison
RoadRoad
Walnut CurveWalnut Curve
W 78
Str
e
et
W 78
Str
e
et
Topaz DriveTopaz Drive
Lake Lucy Lake Lucy
RoadRoad
Pinehurst DrivePinehurst Drive
Crestview DriveCrestview Drive
Whitetail Ridge Whitetail Ridge
CourtCourt
W 65th StreetW 65th Street
Melody Hill Melody Hill
RoadRoad
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
TH 5TH 5 Galpin BlvdGalpin BlvdHazeltine BoulevardHazeltine BoulevardHunter DriveHunter Drive
EXHIBIT 1
EXISTING (2017) INTERSECTION CONTROL AND GEOMETRY
NOT TO SCALE
N
220
NOT TO SCALENOTNOT NOTNOTNNNNOT NOTOOT OONONONONOTNOTNOT OT NOTONOTNOTNNOT NOTNOT NOOOTNOTTTNNTNONOTNOTNOTTOONONONOOTNNOTOT OTT T OTTTNNOTTTTTTOTTNNNT TO STO STOTO STO STO SOSOSOSTO STO TO STO SOSTO STOOSOSOOSSTO SSTTTTTSSSCALCALECALECALECALCCALECALECALELCALCALCALCALECALELALELCALECACALEAACCALCALECCC
EXHIBIT 2
EXISTING (2017) TRAFFIC VOLUMES
100 (12
5
)
10 (20)
5 (
5
)
20
(
1
0
)
5 (5)120 (145
)10 (10)75 (95) 20 (30) 60 (40)
25 (15)
10 (20)15 (25)25 (35)100 (130) 15 (10)
45 (45)
40 (30)10 (30)135 (105) 20 (15)100 (175) 20 (10)
45 (30)270 (170) 0 (5) 20 (5)
10 (5)5 (15)125 (240)15 (10)275 (135) 35 (30) 30 (40)
25 (35)
10 (25)10 (20)35 (55)125 (240) 15 (25)
50 (40)
35 (25)25 (40)40 (65)175 (135) 145 (95) 485 (1300)
50 (80)
70 (155)100 (85)45 (95)80 (150) 25 (50)
1220 (870)
130 (65)
LEGEND
AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Existing AADT
XX (XX)
XX,XXX
Brinker StreetBrinker Street
Hunter DriveHunter Drive
Majestic WayMajestic Way
Longacres DriveLongacres Drive
Wynsong LaneWynsong Lane
Lake Harrison Lake Harrison
RoadRoad
Walnut CurveWalnut Curve
W 78
Str
e
et
W 78
Str
e
et
Topaz DriveTopaz Drive
Lake Lucy Lake Lucy
RoadRoad
Pinehurst DrivePinehurst Drive
Crestview DriveCrestview Drive
Whitetail Ridge Whitetail Ridge
CourtCourt
W 65th StreetW 65th Street
Melody Hill Melody Hill
RoadRoad
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
TH 5TH 5Galpin BlvdGalpin BlvdNOT TO SCALE
N
14,600Hazeltine BoulevardHazeltine Boulevard2,450
2,700
4,350
8,700
5,300
25,500 25,500
2,3002,050
221
Page 5
Existing Traffic Operations
An intersection capacity analysis was performed at the study intersections using the weekday AM and PM
peak hour turning movement volumes. The capacity analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic
software to determine a baseline of operations at the study intersections. The level of service (LOS)
boundaries, as documented in the Highway Capacity Manual, are shown in Table 1 for signalized and
unsignalized intersections. LOS A through LOS D are considered to be acceptable levels of operation for
both signalized and unsignalized intersections.
Table 1: Level of Service Boundaries
Table 2 provides a summary of the delay (seconds per vehicle) and LOS for each individual movement of
the study intersections. The LOS information is also summarized by movement in Exhibit 3. Based on the
Existing Conditions capacity analysis, all intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS during
the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Additionally, all individual movements are operating at LOS D or
better for both the AM and PM peak hours. The SimTraffic reports are included in the Appendix.
222
Page 6 Table 2: Existing Year Peak Hour Delay and Level of Service Results Intersection AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Left Through Right Overall Left Through Right Overall Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Galpin Boulevard & Pheasant Drive Side‐Street Stop Controlled WB 6.3 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.9 A 2.6 A 5.6 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.0 A 2.6 A NB ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.2 A 4.1 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.6 A 4.4 A SB 0.9 A 0.5 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.6 A 0.6 A ‐‐ ‐‐ Galpin Boulevard & Lake Lucy Road All‐Way Stop Controlled EB 5.0 A 6.7 A 3.4 A 6.9 A 5.3 A 6.7 A 3.7 A 7.2 A WB 7.1 A 7.5 A 4.6 A 6.3 A 7.5 A 4.3 A NB 4.9 A 9.3 A 3.6 A 5.4 A 10.2 B 3.2 A SB 4.2 A 8.6 A 2.1 A 4.2 A 8.7 A 2.3 A Galpin Boulevard & Longacres Drive Side‐Street Stop Controlled EB 6.4 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.2 A 4.0 A 5.5 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.4 A 4.2 A NB 4.8 A 4.6 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.2 A 4.6 A ‐‐ ‐‐ SB ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.0 A 2.9 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.4 A 3.1 A Galpin Boulevard & Brinker Street All‐Way Stop Controlled WB 4.7 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.7 A 9.0 A 5.2 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.5 A 8.8 A NB ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.8 A 3.6 A ‐‐ ‐‐ 9.0 A 3.8 A SB 5.0 A 10.4 B ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.6 A 9.3 A ‐‐ ‐‐ Galpin Boulevard & W 78th Street Side‐Street Stop Controlled EB 7.3 A 9.8 A 4.1 A 4.2 A 6.7 A 9.6 A 3.5 A 3.6 A WB 7.2 A 9.5 A 2.6 A 7.7 A 10.8 B 3.2 A NB (1) (1.7) 2.4 (1) (A) A 0.5 A 0.0 A (1) (1.3) 2.2 (1) (A) A 0.6 A 0.1 A SB 4.6 A 4.5 A 3.7 A 6.2 A 4.8 A 4.2 A Galpin Boulevard & TH 5 Signalized EB 46.4 D 19.2 B 7.0 A 18.6 B 50.5 D 25.5 C 4.8 A 23.5 C WB 41.1 D 10.2 B 3.0 A 38.9 D 19.6 B 7.9 A NB 29.4 C 37.4 D 14.7 B 32.4 C 39.6 D 11.6 B SB 27.0 C 28.4 C 11.0 B 32.3 C 37.1 D 21.2 C (1) Delay and LOS are reported for both the (U‐turn) and left movements for the northbound left turn lane at Galpin Boulevard and W 78th Street 223
NOT TO SCALENOTNOT NOTNOTNNNNOT NOTOOT OONONONONOTNOTNOT OT NOTONOTNOTNNOT NOTNOT NOOOTNOTTTNNTNONOTNOTNOTTOONONONOOTNNOTOT OTT T OTTTNNOTTTTTTOTTNNNT TO STO STOTO STO STO SOSOSOSTO STO TO STO SOSTO STOOSOSOOSSTO SSTTTTTSSSCALCALECALECALECALCCALECALECALELCALCALCALCALECALELALELCALECACALEAACCALCALECCC
EXHIBIT 3
EXISTING (2017) INTERSECTION DELAY AND LOS
A / A
A / A
A / A
B / C
A / A 0.5/A [0.6/
A] 0.9/A [1.6/
A] 6.
3
/
A
[
5
.
6
/
A
]
2.
9
/
A
[
3
.
0
/
A
]4.1/A [4.4/
A]4.2/A [3.6/
A]
A / A
2.1/A [2.3/A]8.6/A [8.7/A]4.2/A [4.2/A] 7.5/A [7.5/A]
7.1/A [6.3/A]
4.6/A [4.3/A]3.6/A [3.2/A]4.9/A [5.4/A]9.3/A [10.2/B]5.0/A [5.3/A]
6.7/A [6.7/A]
3.4/A [3.7/A]2.9/A [3.1/A]3.0/A [3.4/A] 4.8/A [5.2/A]4.6/A [4.6/A]6.4/A [5.5/A]
4.2/A [3.4/A]10.4/B [9.3/A] 5.0/A [4.6/A] 4.7/A [5.2/A]
2.7/A [2.5/A]3.6/A [3.8/A]7.8/A [9.0/A]3.7/A [4.2/A] 4.5/A [4.8/A] 4.6/A [6.2/A] 9.5/A [10.8/B]
7.2/A [7.7/A]
2.6/A [3.2/A] 0.0/A [0.1/A]2.4/A [2.2/A]0.5/A [0.6/A]7.3/A [6.7/A]
9.8/A [9.6/A]
4.1/A [3.5/A]1.7/A [1.3/A]11.0/B [21.2/C]28.4/C [37.1/D] 27.0/C [32.3/C] 10.2/B [19.6/B]
41.1/D [38.9/D]
3.0/A [7.9/A] 14.7/B [11.6/B] 29.4/C [32.4/C] 37.4/D [39.6/D]46.4/D [50.5/D]
19.2/B [25.5/C]
7.0/A [4.8/A]
Brinker StreetBrinker Street
Hunter DriveHunter Drive
Majestic WayMajestic Way
Longacres DriveLongacres Drive
Wynsong LaneWynsong Lane
Lake Harrison Lake Harrison
RoadRoad
Walnut CurveWalnut Curve
W 78
Str
e
et
W 78
Str
e
et
Topaz DriveTopaz Drive
Lake Lucy Lake Lucy
RoadRoad
Pinehurst DrivePinehurst Drive
Crestview DriveCrestview Drive
Whitetail Ridge Whitetail Ridge
CourtCourt
W 65th StreetW 65th Street
Melody Hill Melody Hill
RoadRoad
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
TH 5TH 5 Galpin BlvdGalpin BlvdNOT TO SCALE
N
LEGEND
AM / PM Overall Intersection LOS
AM [PM] Delay/LOSXX.X/A [XX.X/A]
A / AHazeltine BoulevardHazeltine Boulevard224
Page 8
Existing Queue Analysis
A review of existing vehicle queueing based on the SimTraffic analysis and field observations show no
significant queueing issues. All queueing can be accommodated from the existing storage provided at the
turn lanes. Additionally, at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and TH 5, the through queues are not
blocking entry into the turn lanes. The SimTraffic reports that provide the queueing information are
included in the Appendix.
Crash Analysis
Historical crash data was obtained for the previous ten (10) year period using MnDOT’s Crash Mapping
Analysis Tool (MnCMAT). A review of the crash data showed that there was a total of 97 crashes at study
intersections. Of the 97 crashes, there were 0 fatalities, 1 incapacitating injury, 4 non-incapacitating
injuries, 21 possible injuries, and 71 property damage only crashes.
Intersection crash rates, both site specific and statewide average, are included in Table 3. Crash rates
provide an indication of the number of crashes that can be expected per entering vehicle over a given
analysis period. Using MnDOT’s 2015 “Green Sheets,” intersection crash rates were calculated and
compared against metro and statewide average values to develop a critical index value (for the purposes
of this analysis, the statewide and metro average are assumed to be the same value). This value is used
to determine if an intersection is operating outside of the expected normal range, where a critical index
value over 1.0 means the intersection is outside of the normal range.
Table 3: Crash Summary
Intersection
Total
Number
of
Crashes
Crash Type Observed
Crash
Rate
Average
Crash
Rate
Critical
Crash
Rate
Critical
Index
PD C B A K
Galpin Boulevard &
Pheasant Drive 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.19 0.19 0.58 0.33
Galpin Boulevard &
Lake Lucy Road 1 0 1 0 0 0 0.06 0.35 0.74 0.08
Galpin Boulevard &
Longacres Drive 6 5 1 0 0 0 0.42 0.19 0.52 0.81
Galpin Boulevard &
Brinker Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.35 0.75 0.00
Galpin Boulevard &
W 78th Street 14 13 1 0 0 0 0.44 0.19 0.41 1.07
Galpin Boulevard &
TH 5 74 51 18 4 1 0 0.62 0.45 0.62 1.00
225
Page 9
The intersection of Galpin Boulevard and W 78th Street has a historic crash rate that is above the critical
index. Of the total crashes at W 78th Street, twelve were right angle crashes with the side street vehicle
failing to yield the right-of-way. While W 78th Street is over the critical index by a small margin, all but
one of the crashes resulted in property damage only, and there were no injuries or fatalities. No specific
trends among the right-angle crashes at W 78th Street were identified.
Along the corridor, there were only 14 reported crashes during the previous ten years. Six (6) crashes
occurred along the roadway, seven (7) took place at other non-study intersections along the corridor, and
one (1) occurred at a residential driveway with access directly to Galpin Boulevard. Exhibit 4 provides a
summary of the crashes (including crash type) along the corridor.
226
NOT TO SCALENOTNOT NOTNOTNNNNOT NOTOOT OONONONONOTNOTNOT OT NOTONOTNOTNNOT NOTNOT NOOOTNOTTTNNTNONOTNOTNOTTOONONONOOTNNOTOT OTT T OTTTNNOTTTTTTOTTNNNT TO STO STOTO STO STO SOSOSOSTO STO TO STO SOSTO STOOSOSOOSSTO SSTTTTTSSSCALCALECALECALECALCCALECALECALELCALCALCALCALECALELALELCALECACALEAACCALCALECCC
EXHIBIT 4
10 YEAR CRASH SUMMARY
31
11
11
8
7
5
12
LEGEND
Rear End
Ran Off The Road
Right Angle
Left Turn
Sideswipe
Head On
Right Turn
Other
2
Brinker StreetBrinker Street
Hunter DriveHunter Drive
Majestic WayMajestic Way
Longacres DriveLongacres Drive
Wynsong LaneWynsong Lane
Lake Harrison Lake Harrison
RoadRoad
Walnut CurveWalnut Curve
W 78
Str
e
et
W 78
Str
e
et
Topaz DriveTopaz Drive
Lake Lucy Lake Lucy
RoadRoad
Pinehurst DrivePinehurst Drive
Crestview DriveCrestview Drive
Whitetail Ridge Whitetail Ridge
CourtCourt
W 65th StreetW 65th Street
Melody Hill Melody Hill
RoadRoad
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
TH 5TH 5 Galpin BlvdGalpin BlvdNOT TO SCALE
N
Hazeltine BoulevardHazeltine Boulevard227
Page 11
Design Year (2040) No-Action Intersection Analysis
A capacity analysis was performed at the study intersections for the Design Year (2040) to get an idea of
baseline operating conditions along the corridor in the future. Below is a summary of the Design Year
(2040) volume development and anticipated operating conditions during the AM and PM peak hours.
Design Year (2040) Volume Forecast
Based on the Traffic Volume Forecasting Memorandum, which considered historical growth and
forecasted growth in the City of Chanhassen’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, a 1.0% annual growth rate was
applied to the existing traffic counts to develop background traffic volumes along Galpin Boulevard. Based
on discussion with City staff, the large tract of land on the east side of Galpin Boulevard between W 78th
Street and Lake Lucy Road is anticipated to be developed into a residential subdivision with approximately
250 single family dwelling units. At this point, access to the development is expected to be provided via a
connection to the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and Longacres Drive. Based on existing traffic counts,
it is anticipated that 75% of the traffic will access the site to/from the south and 25% to/from the north.
Exhibit 5 provides a summary of the Design Year (2040) forecasted turning movement volumes, which
accounts for both background growth and anticipated traffic from the adjacent residential subdivision.
The exhibit also provides 2040 ADT volumes, which was based on the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan
except for the TH 5 forecast. The TH 5 forecast was estimated based by applying a 1.0% growth rate that
was based on a review of historic traffic growth in the area and the regional travel demand model.
Design Year (2040) No-Action Intersection Capacity Analysis
Using the forecasted Design Year (2040) AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes, a capacity
analysis was performed at the study intersections to determine baseline operating conditions in 2040.
Existing intersection control and geometry were assumed for this No-Action analysis. Table 4 provides a
summary of the delay (seconds/vehicle) and LOS at the study intersections. Exhibit 6 also provides a
summary of the delay and LOS for each individual movement at the study intersections. Based on the
analysis, all turning movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better except for several left-turn
movements at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and TH 5 that are LOS E. This is not a concern because
the traffic volumes for these movements are not very high, the operations are not negatively impacting
adjacent movements, and it is not unique for left-turning traffic with lower turning movements to
experience LOS E at a traffic signal under forecast traffic conditions. The SimTraffic reports are included
in the Appendix.
Design Year (2040) No-Action Queue Analysis
Similar to Existing Conditions, the provided storage at the turn lanes along the corridor are anticipated to
accommodate the 95th percentile queue for the Design Year (2040) No-Action weekday AM and PM peak
hours. As traffic increases along TH 5, the through movement queues are anticipated to increase, so there
may be a few occasions in the eastbound direction during both peak hours and the westbound direction
during the PM peak hour where the through queue has the potential to block entry into the dedicated
turn lanes; however, since these occurrences are anticipated to be low, there are no recommended
changes to the turn lanes.
228
NOT TO SCALENOTNOT NOTNOTNNNNOT NOTOOT OONONONONOTNOTNOT OT NOTONOTNOTNNOT NOTNOT NOOOTNOTTTNNTNONOTNOTNOTTOONONONOOTNNOTOT OTT T OTTTNNOTTTTTTOTTNNNT TO STO STOTO STO STO SOSOSOSTO STO TO STO SOSTO STOOSOSOOSSTO SSTTTTTSSSCALCALECALECALECALCCALECALECALELCALCALCALCALECALELALELCALECACALEAACCALCALECCC
EXHIBIT 5
DESIGN YEAR (2040) TRAFFIC VOLUMES
135 (18
0
)
10 (20)
5 (
5
)
20
(
1
0
)
5 (5)170 (19
5)15 (15)100 (145) 25 (40) 75 (50)
35 (30)
15 (25)25 (35)40 (50)145 (180)20(15)
55 (55)
50 (50)10 (30)170 (130) 20 (15)125 (220) 20 (10)
45 (30)
105 (70)
35 (25)10 (40) 35 (115)445 (285) 0 (5) 20 (5)
10 (5)5 (15)190 (415)20 (15)450 (240) 45 (40) 40 (50)
30 (45)
15 (30)15 (25)45 (70)190 (415)20 (30)
65 (50)
45 (30)30 (50)65 (90)260 (200) 230 (155) 610 (1635)
65 (100)
105 (250)125 (105)55 (120)115 (235) 35 (80)
1535 (1095)
165 (80)
Brinker StreetBrinker Street
Hunter DriveHunter Drive
Majestic WayMajestic Way
Longacres DriveLongacres Drive
Wynsong LaneWynsong Lane
Lake Harrison Lake Harrison
RoadRoad
Walnut CurveWalnut Curve
W 78
Str
e
et
W 78
Str
e
et
Topaz DriveTopaz Drive
Lake Lucy Lake Lucy
RoadRoad
Pinehurst DrivePinehurst Drive
Crestview DriveCrestview Drive
Whitetail Ridge Whitetail Ridge
CourtCourt
W 65th StreetW 65th Street
Melody Hill Melody Hill
RoadRoad
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
TH 5TH 5Galpin BlvdGalpin BlvdNOT TO SCALE
N
Hazeltine BoulevardHazeltine Boulevard15,100
LEGEND
AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
2040 AADT
XX (XX)
XX,XXX
3,800
3,500
5,300
10,000
32,100
8,200
32,100
3,0002,100
229
Page 13
Table 4: Design Year (2040) No-Action Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection
AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
Left Through Right Overall Left Through Right Overall Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Galpin Boulevard
&
Pheasant Drive
Side-
Street
Stop
Controlled
WB 5.7 A -- -- 3.4 A
3.0 A
6.6 A -- -- 2.7 A
2.9 A NB -- -- 3.4 A 4.4 A -- -- 4.0 A 3.9 A
SB 1.9 A 0.7 A -- -- 1.6 A 1.0 A -- --
Galpin Boulevard
&
Lake Lucy Road
All-Way
Stop
Controlled
EB 6.0 A 7.1 A 3.5 A
7.8 A
6.2 A 7.2 A 3.9 A
8.4 A WB 7.1 A 8.7 A 5.8 A 7.2 A 8.2 A 5.6 A
NB 6.6 A 10.5 B 4.2 A 7.7 A 11.4 B 5.5 A
SB 4.5 A 9.0 A 2.5 A 5.4 A 9.9 A 2.6 A
Galpin Boulevard
&
Longacres Drive
Side-
Street
Stop
Controlled
EB 5.7 A -- -- 5.1 A
5.2 A
7.5 A -- -- 3.5 A
5.7 A WB 8.1 A -- -- 4.5 A 8.6 A -- -- 4.8 A
NB 5.5 A 5.5 A 4.7 A 7.1 A 6.4 A 5.5 A
SB 3.8 A 3.5 A 3.2 A 5.7 A 4.0 A 3.5 A
Galpin Boulevard
&
Brinker Street
All-Way
Stop
Controlled
WB 5.0 A -- -- 2.9 A
11.2 B
4.3 A -- -- 2.7 A
11.5 B NB -- -- 9.2 A 3.1 A -- -- 12.5 B 6.3 A
SB 0.0 A 12.7 B -- -- 6.9 A 10.5 B -- --
Galpin Boulevard
&
W 78th Street
Side-
Street
Stop
Controlled
EB 13.5 B 15.4 C 7.7 A
5.7 A
15.2 B 15.1 B 6.9 A
4.8 A
WB 16.2 C 13.4 B 4.5 A 14.2 B 15.0 B 6.9 A
NB (1) (3.7)
4.1
(1) (A)
A 0.7 A 0.0 A (1) (1.9)
2.7
(1)
(A)
A
0.9 A 0.1 A
SB 6.1 A 5.3 A 4.0 A 7.6 A 5.2 A 4.1 A
Galpin Boulevard
&
TH 5
Signalized
EB 59.1 E 28.2 C 9.9 A
28.3 C
69.2 E 41.5 D 7.6 A
40.9 D WB 61.6 E 14.4 B 4.1 A 53.4 D 40.0 D 16.1 B
NB 39.7 D 53.1 D 29.9 C 46.0 D 54.5 D 26.9 C
SB 42.5 D 44.2 D 27.1 C 54.2 D 50.7 D 39.1 D
(1) Delay and LOS are reported for both the (U-turn) and left movements for the northbound left turn lane at Galpin Boulevard and W 78th Street
230
NOT TO SCALENOTNOT NOTNOTNNNNOT NOTOOT OONONONONOTNOTNOT OT NOTONOTNOTNNOT NOTNOT NOOOTNOTTTNNTNONOTNOTNOTTOONONONOOTNNOTOT OTT T OTTTNNOTTTTTTOTTNNNT TO STO STOTO STO STO SOSOSOSTO STO TO STO SOSTO STOOSOSOOSSTO SSTTTTTSSSCALCALECALECALECALCCALECALECALELCALCALCALCALECALELALELCALECACALEAACCALCALECCC
EXHIBIT 6
DESIGN YEAR (2040) DELAY AND LOS (NO-ACTION)
A / A
A / A 0.7/A [1.0/
A] 1.9/A [1.6/A] 5.
7
/
A
[
6
.
6
/
A
]
3.
4
/
A
[
2
.
7
/
A
]4.4/A [3.9/A]3.4/A [4.0/
A]
A / A
2.5/A [2.6/A]9.0/A [9.9/A] 4.5/A [5.4/A] 8.7/A [8.2/A]
7.1/A [7.2/A]
5.8/A [5.6/A]4.2/A [5.5/A]6.6/A [7.7/A]10.5/B [11.4/B]6.0/A [6.2/A]
7.1/A [7.2/A]
3.5/A [3.9/A] 3.2/A [3.5/A]3.5/A [4.0/A] 5.5/A [7.1/A]5.5/A [6.4/A]5.7/A [7.5/A]
5.1/A [3.5/A]
4.5/A [4.8/A]
8.1/A [8.6/A]4.7/A [5.5/A]3.8/A [5.7/A] 12.7/B [10.5/B] 0.0/A [6.9/A] 5.0/A [4.3/A]
2.9/A [2.7/A]3.1/A [6.3/A]9.2/A [12.5/B]4.0/A [4.1/A] 5.3/A [5.2/A] 6.1/A [7.6/A] 13.4/B [15.0/B]
16.2/C [14.2/B]
4.5/A [6.9/A] 0.0/A [0.1/A]4.1/A [2.7/A]0.7/A [0.9/A]13.5/B [15.2/B]
15.4/C [15.1/B]
7.7/A [6.9/A]3.7/A [1.9/A]27.1/C [39.1/D]44.2/D [50.7/D] 42.5/D [54.2/D] 14.4/B [40.0/D]
61.6/E [53.4/D]
4.1/A [16.1/B] 29.9/C [26.9/C] 39.7/D [46.0/D] 53.1/D [54.5/D]59.1/E [69.2/E]
28.2/C [41.5/D]
9.9/A [7.6/A]
Brinker StreetBrinker Street
Hunter DriveHunter Drive
Majestic WayMajestic Way
Longacres DriveLongacres Drive
Wynsong LaneWynsong Lane
Lake Harrison Lake Harrison
RoadRoad
Walnut CurveWalnut Curve
W 78
Str
e
et
W 78
Str
e
et
Topaz DriveTopaz Drive
Lake Lucy Lake Lucy
RoadRoad
Pinehurst DrivePinehurst Drive
Crestview DriveCrestview Drive
Whitetail Ridge Whitetail Ridge
CourtCourt
W 65th StreetW 65th Street
Melody Hill Melody Hill
RoadRoad
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
TH 5TH 5 Galpin BlvdGalpin BlvdNOT TO SCALE
N
LEGEND
AM / PM Overall Intersection LOS
AM [PM] Delay/LOSXX.X/A [XX.X/A]
A / A
B / B
A / A
C / DHazeltine BoulevardHazeltine Boulevard231
Page 15
Design Year (2040) Alternatives Analysis
As part of the corridor study, multiple roadway and intersection alternatives were considered. In total,
three (3) alternatives were considered. The first alternative (Alternative A) considers the reconstruction
of the roadway without any intersection control or lane assignment changes. From a traffic analysis
perspective, the delays and LOS for Alternative A will be the same as the No-Action scenario. The second
alternative (Alternative B) adds dedicated turn lanes (left-turn and right-turn) to all major intersections
along the study corridor, including W 78 th Street, Brinker Street, Longacres Road, and Lake Lucy Road, in
addition to the removal of the all-way stop control at Brinker Street. Turn lane modifications at W 78 th
Street are anticipated to clarify operations by removing the through-right lanes northbound and
southbound and the lane drop northbound that currently exists within the intersection, both of which are
anticipated to have a positive impact on reducing the crash rate at this intersection. The third alternative
(Alternative C) includes the installation of roundabouts or mini-roundabouts at W 78 th Street, Brinker
Street, and Lake Lucy Road.
Exhibit 7 provides the intersection control and lane assignments at the major intersections for all three
alternatives. Under Alternatives A and B, the intersection at Lake Lucy Road will remain all-way stop
control. Under all scenarios, the intersection at Longacres Road will remain side-street stop control.
Operating conditions of the major intersections were reviewed using Synchro/SimTraffic for Alternatives
A and B and RODEL for Alternative C. The purpose of this review is to provide a comparison of operating
conditions between No-Action/Alternative A and Alternatives B and C. As mentioned previously, there are
no proposed changes to intersection control or lane assignments under Alternative A, so the delay and
LOS results are the same as presented previously in Table 4.
Table 5 provides a summary of vehicle delay and LOS at the major intersections for Alternative B. Based
on the analysis, all intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours
with the proposed turn lane improvements. Additionally, all movements are anticipated to operate at LOS
B or better during the AM and PM peak hours. These results are similar to the No-Action operating
conditions at these intersections. The SimTraffic reports are provided in the Appendix.
Table 6 provides a summary of vehicle delay and LOS at the W 78th Street, Brinker Street, and Lake Lucy
Road intersections for Alternative C. There are no changes proposed between Alternative B and
Alternative C at the Longacres Road intersection. Based on the analysis, the three intersections are
anticipated to operate at LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours as single-lane roundabouts. These
operating conditions are similar to the No-Action operating conditions for these intersections. The RODEL
reports are provided in the Appendix.
Exhibit 8 provides the intersection delay and LOS at the major intersections for all three alternatives.
Based on a review of all three corridor alternatives, the study intersections are all anticipated to operate
at acceptable LOS through the Design Year (2040) for No-Action as well as the three alternatives. Although
there isn’t a significant crash history along the corridor, implementing Alternative B should provide safer
operations throughout the corridor as all Galpin Boulevard turning traffic at the study intersections will
turn from dedicated turn lanes instead of the through lane.
232
Page 16
The roundabouts included as part of Alternative C typically result in fewer right-angle and left-turn related
crashes which is anticipated to result in a reduction of the most prevalent crash type at the intersection
of Galpin Boulevard and W 78th Street (right angle). Alternative C would also replace the all-way stop
control at Brinker Street and Lake Lucy Road reducing delay for the northbound and southbound through
movements without having any signification impacts on the eastbound and westbound minor approach.
Roundabouts also reduce travel speeds near the roundabout which can serve as a form of traffic calming.
The queuing at TH 5 for southbound Galpin Boulevard was also reviewed as queues that extend into a
roundabout cause safety and operational concerns. The 95 th percentile queue for the southbound Galpin
Boulevard movement at TH 5 does not exceed 250 feet under the design year (2040) scenario. Given the
distance between the intersections is approximately 750 feet, queuing is not anticipated to negatively
impact the operations of the roundabout at Galpin Boulevard and W 78th Street.
233
NOT TO SCALENOTNOT NOTNOT NOT NOT NOTNOONOT TNOTOTNOTNONOT NNOT NOTOOOTNNNNOTNT TNNTNT TOTOTOTOTTOTOTO TO TO SO STO SO STOO SO STO SOSOSTO STO STO SOTO STO STO TO TOTO STO TO O STTOTOTOTOSOOTOTTOTTOOTOOTTTO STTOOTOCACALECALECALECCALECALECALECALECACALECALECALECAALEECACACACCACCCCALEECAAA
EXHIBIT 7
DESIGN YEAR (2040) ALTERNATIVES
INTERSECTION CONTROL AND GEOMETRY
Brinker StreetBrinker Street
W 78
Str
e
et
W 78
Str
e
et
Lake Lucy Lake Lucy
RoadRoad
Galpin BlvdGalpin BlvdNOT TO SCALE
N
Longacres DriveLongacres Drive
Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C
Alternative CAlternative A Alternative B
LEGEND
Study Intersection
Proposed Stop Control
Proposed Roundabout Control
Enhanced Pedestrian Crosswalk
Alternative CAlternative A Alternative B
Alternative CAlternative A Alternative BHazeltine BoulevardHazeltine BoulevardAlternative A:Alternative C:Alternative B:
Existing Intersection
Geometry and Control
Turn Lane Modifications,
Brinker Street Becomes
One-Way Stop Controlled,
and Lake Lucy Road Becomes
Two-Way Stop Controlled
Roundabouts at
Lake Lucy Road, Brinker Street,
and W 78th Street.
TH 5TH 5
234
Page 18
Table 5: Design Year (2040) Alternative B Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection
AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
Left Through Right Overall Left Through Right Overall Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Galpin Boulevard &
Lake Lucy Road
All-Way
Stop
Controlled
EB 6.7 A 8.8 A 4.3 A
3.8 A
9.3 A 8.9 A 4.6 A
3.9 A WB 9.2 A 9.0 A 5.9 A 10.1 B 9.9 A 5.6 A
NB 2.0 A 1.3 A 0.7 A 2.5 A 2.6 A 1.5 A
SB 4.7 A 9.1 A 3.3 A 2.3 A 1.1 A 0.7 A
Galpin Boulevard &
Longacres Drive
Side-
Street
Stop
Controlled
EB 6.0 A -- -- 4.7 A
3.1 A
8.7 A -- -- 3.9 A
2.7 A WB 7.6 A -- -- 4.9 A 7.9 A -- -- 4.0 A
NB 1.8 A 1.4 A 1.0 A 2.4 A 2.1 A 1.8 A
SB 1.8 A 1.5 A 0.3 A 2.7 A 1.2 A 1.2 A
Galpin Boulevard &
Brinker Street
Side-
Street
Stop
Controlled
WB 7.8 A -- -- 3.0 A
1.5 A
7.4 A -- -- 4.0 A
1.8 A NB -- -- 0.8 A 0.6 A -- -- 1.2 A 0.9 A
SB 0.0 A 1.4 A -- -- 3.2 1.1 2.7 A -- --
Galpin Boulevard &
W 78th Street
Side-
Street
Stop
Controlled
EB 14.2 B 14.9 B 7.7 A
3.9 A
13.9 B 15.8 C 5.9 A
3.9 A
WB 12.3 B 12.5 B 3.6 A 17.4 C 15.0 B 6.7 A
NB (1) (2.8)
4.1
(1) (A)
A 0.7 A 0.1 A (1) (2.0)
2.9
(1) (A)
A 0.9 A 0.1 A
SB 3.0 A 1.9 A 0.9 A 4.1 A 1.7 A 0.6 A
(1) Delay and LOS are reported for both the (U-turn) and left movements for the northbound approach at Galpin Boulevard and W 78th Street.
235
Page 19
Table 6: Design Year (2040) Alternative C Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Approach Overall Approach Overall Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay LOS Galpin Boulevard
&
Lake Lucy Road
Roundabout
EB Approach 3.8 A
3.9 A
3.9 A
4.1 A WB Approach 3.9 A 3.9 A
NB Approach 4.0 A 4.3 A
SB Approach 3.8 A 4.0 A
Galpin Boulevard
&
Brinker Street
Roundabout
WB Approach 3.5 A
4.7 A
3.7 A
4.7 A NB Approach 3.8 A 5.0 A
SB Approach 5.2 A 4.2 A
Galpin Boulevard
&
W 78th Street
Roundabout
EB Approach 4.7 A
5.4 A
4.1 A
5.7 A WB Approach 3.9 A 4.8 A
NB Approach 4.4 A 6.6 A
SB Approach 6.3 A 4.8 `A
236
NOT TO SCALENOTNOT NOTNOT NOT NOT NOTNOONOT TNOTOTNOTNONOT NNOT NOTOOOTNNNNOTNT TNNTNT TOTOTOTOTTOTOTO TO TO SO STO SO STOO SO STO SOSOSTO STO STO SOTO STO STO TO TOTO STO TO O STTOTOTOTOSOOTOTTOTTOOTOOTTTO STTOOTOCACALECALECALECCALECALECALECALECACALECALECALECAALEECACACACCACCCCALEECAAA
EXHIBIT 8
DESIGN YEAR (2040) DELAY AND LOS (ALTERNATIVES)
Brinker StreetBrinker Street
W 78
Str
e
et
W 78
Str
e
et
Lake Lucy Lake Lucy
RoadRoad
Galpin BlvdGalpin BlvdAlternative A Alternative C
3.8/A [5.0/A] 3.5/A [3.7/A] 5.2/A [4.2/A] Alternative B
1.4/A [1.1/A] 0.0/A [3.2/A] 7.8/A [7.4/A]
3.0/A [4.0/A]0.6/A [0.9/A]0.8/A [1.2/A]A / A A / A A / A
4.7/A [4.1/A]4.4/A [6.6/A] 3.9/A [4.8/A] 6.3/A [4.8/A] Alternative C
A / A0.9/A [0.6/A]1.9/A [1.7/A] 3.0/A [4.1/A] 12.5/B [15.0/B]
12.3/B [17.4/C]
3.6/A [6.7/A]0.1/A [0.1/A]4.1/A [2.9/A]0.7/A [0.9/A]14.2/B [13.9/B]
14.9/B [15.8/C]
7.7/A [5.9/A]2.8/A [2.0/A]A / A
Alternative B
A / A
Alternative A
Alternative C
3.8/A [3.9/A]4.0/A [4.3/A] 3.9/B [3.9/A] 3.8/A [4.0/A] Alternative B
0.9/A [0.7/A]1.1/A [1.1/A] 1.7/A [2.3/A] 9.0/A [9.9/A]
9.2/A [10.1/B]
5.9/A [5.6/A]0.7/A [1.5/A]2.0/A [2.5/A]1.3/A [2.6/A]6.7/A [9.3/A]
8.8/A [8.9/A]
4.3/A [4.6/A]
A / A A / A
Alternative A
NOT TO SCALE
N
Longacres DriveLongacres Drive
A / A
Alternative CAlternative BAlternative A
0.3/A [1.2/A]1.5/A [1.2/A] 1.8/A [2.4/A]1.4/A [2.1/A]6.0/A [8.7/A]
4.7/A [3.9/A]
4.9/A [4.0/A]
7.6/A [7.9/A]1.0/A [1.8/A]1.8/A [2.7/A] A / A 2.9/A [3.3/A]3.6/A [7.9/A] 2.4/A [6.2/A]1.3/A [9.5/A]6.4/A [5.3/A]
4.7/A [3.4/A]
4.7/A [3.8/A]
7.3/A [5.3/A]0.8/A [5.7/A]3.9/A [5.3/A] LEGEND
AM / PM Overall Intersection LOS
AM [PM] Delay/LOSXX.X/A [XX.X/A]
A / A
A / A
A / A2.3/A [2.6/A]9.3/A [9.6/A] 5.1/A [5.5/A] 8.2/A [8.5/A]
6.3/A [7.4/A]
5.0/A [5.0/A]4.7/A [5.5/A]6.6/A [7.4/A]10.3/A [11.8/B]5.6/A [6.3/A]
7.2/A [7.3/A]
3.8/A [4.0/A] 2.8/A [3.6/A]3.6/A [4.2/A] 5.9/A [6.7/A]5.3/A [6.3/A]7.0/A [7.1/A]
5.1/A [4.1/A]
4.6/A [4.5/A]
7.8/A [8.7/A]4.5/A [5.3/A]3.8/A [5.8/A] 12.5/B [10.6/B] 0.0/A [8.9/A] 4.9/A [5.1/A]
2.7/A [2.6/A]3.8/A [6.0/A]8.7/A [12.2/B]3.9/A [4.6/A] 5.2/A [5.2/A] 5.9/A [7.4/A] 13.3/B [14.6/B]
13.6/B [16.9/B]
3.2/A [7.2/A] 0.1/A [0.1/A]4.3/A [3.1/A]0.7/A [0.9/A]13.7/B [12.5/B]
15.6/C [14.8/B]
7.2/A [6.4/A]3.5/A [2.2/A]Hazeltine BoulevardHazeltine BoulevardTH 5TH 5
Alternative A:Alternative C:Alternative B:
Existing Intersection
Geometry and Control
Turn Lane Modifications,
Brinker Street Becomes
One-Way Stop Controlled,
and Lake Lucy Road Becomes
Two-Way Stop Controlled
Roundabouts at
Lake Lucy Road, Brinker Street,
and W 78th Street.
237
Page 21
Conclusions and Recommendations
Carver County is preparing to turn back Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) to the City of Chanhassen from TH 5 to
the northern City limit. As part of the turnback process, a traffic analysis was completed to determine
existing and future operating conditions of the corridor, and determine if any roadway/intersection
improvements should be made as a part of the proposed corridor reconstruction. This memorandum
provides a summary of existing intersection operations, historic crash data, volume forecasting, and 2040
analysis of No-Action and three proposed reconstruction alternatives (Alternatives A, B and C) for Galpin
Boulevard.
Based on the existing operations analysis, all intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS during the
AM and PM peak hours. A review of the crash data shows that all intersections are operating within
normal expected ranges with the exception of W 78th Street, where the critical index exceeds 0.99. At this
intersection, the majority of crashes were right-angle with no injuries or fatalities being reported.
Improvements to the W 78th Street intersection should be considered during alternative development to
reduce the future number of crashes.
The Design Year (2040) No-Action intersection analysis, which took into consideration background growth
of 1.0% annually and traffic from the proposed residential subdivision in the project area, showed that all
intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS under all scenarios including No-Action.
Although there isn’t a significant crash history along the corridor, implementing Alternative B would
provide safer operations throughout the corridor as all turning traffic off Galpin Boulevard will turn from
a dedicated lane instead of the through lane. The roundabouts included as a part of Alternative C typically
result in fewer right-angle and left-turn related crashes. Alternative C would also replace the all-way stop
control at Brinker Street and Lake Lucy Road reducing delay for the northbound and southbound through
movements without having any signification impacts on the eastbound and westbound approaches.
Roundabouts also reduce travel speeds and can serve as a form of traffic calming.
The analysis showed that the 2040 No-Action intersection geometry would be acceptable from a traffic
operations and safety perspective. Given current design standards and the expectation of drivers, it is
recommended that either Alternative B or C, or a combination of the improvements proposed for these
alternatives be implemented. The ultimate decision should be based on a variety of considerations
including public input, construction costs, right-of-way impacts, etc. It is important to note that
roundabout control or all-way stops are not warranted at Brinker Street, Lake Lucy Road, or W 78th Street
based on a review of the traffic volumes and operations analysis. If roundabouts are ultimately selected
as these intersections, Roundabout Justification Reports (RJR) will be required if State Aid funding is
proposed for the roadway reconstruction.
238
Page 22
Appendix
1. Traffic Forecasting Memorandum
2. Existing Year (2017) SimTraffic Reports
3. Design Year (2040) No-Action/Alternative A SimTraffic
Reports
4. Design Year (2040) Alternative B SimTraffic Reports
5. Design Year (2040) Alternative C RODEL Reports
239
1. TRAFFIC FORECASTING MEMORANDUM
240
DRAFT MEMORANDUM
To: Paul Oehme, P.E.
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
City of Chanhassen, MN
Darin Mielke, P.E., LSIT, PMP
Assistant Public Works Director / Deputy County Engineer
Carver County Public Works
Dan McCormick, P.E., PTOE
Transportation Manager
Carver County Public Works
From: Brandon Bourdon, P.E.
Doug Arnold, P.E.
Date: January 5, 2018
Re: Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Reconstruction - Traffic Volume Forecasting
Background Information
Kimley-Horn has been hired by the City of Chanhassen to provide preliminary design and traffic
engineering services for the potential reconstruction of Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) between Arboretum
Boulevard (TH 5) and the northern border of the City of Chanhassen. As part of the preliminary
engineering, a traffic analysis is being performed at critical intersections along the study corridor to
determine the most appropriate intersection control and geometry recommended to accommodate
existing conditions and anticipated growth along the corridor.
This memorandum provides a summary of existing weekday peak hour turning movement volumes at the
study intersections, and documents the future volume forecasting process, assumptions, and the 2040
Design Year volume forecasts.
Existing Conditions
Existing turning movement volumes and pedestrian volumes were collected in December 2017 at the
following study intersections along Galpin Boulevard: Arboretum Boulevard (TH 5), W 78th Street, Brinker
Street, Longacres Drive, Lake Lucy Road, and Pheasant Drive.
Exhibit 1 provides a summary of the turning movement volumes during the weekday AM and PM peak
hours along with existing AADT volumes. Raw traffic data from the field data collection is included in the
Appendix.
241
NOT TO SCALE
TH 5
W 78
Str
e
et
Walnut Curve
Brinker Street
Majestic Way
Hunter Drive
Longacres Drive
Wynsong Lane
Lake Harrison Road
Topaz Drive
Lake Lucy Road
Pinehurst Drive
Crestview Drive
Whitetail Ridge CourtW 65th Street
Melody Hill
Road
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
Galpin BlvdEXISTING (2017)
P EAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES100 (125) 10 (20) 5 (5)
20 (10)5 (5)120 (145)10 (10)75 (95) 20 (30) 60 (40)
25 (15)
10 (20)15 (25)25 (35)100 (130) 15 (10)
45 (45)
40 (30)10 (30)135 (105) 20 (15)100 (175) 20 (10)
45 (30)270 (170) 0 (5) 20 (5)
10 (5)5 (15)125 (240)15 (10)275 (135) 35 (30) 30 (40)
25 (35)
10 (25)10 (20)60 (90)125 (240) 15 (25)
50 (40)
35 (25)40 (65)175 (135) 145 (95) 485 (1300)
50 (80)
70 (155)100 (85)45 (95)80 (150) 25 (50)
1220 (870)
130 (65)
LEGEND
AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Existing AADT
XX (XX)
X,XXX 4,3508,7002,7002,450242
Page 3
Design Year (2040) Volume Forecast
Future traffic was projected along the study corridor to determine peak hour traffic volumes at the study
intersections for the 2040 Design Year (approximately 20 years beyond opening). Historic daily traffic
volumes from MnDOT and forecasted volume information from the City of Chanhassen’s 2040
Comprehensive Plan were used to develop the annual growth rates used to project the Design Year 2040
traffic volumes.
Additionally, changes in local land use were considered when developing the 2040 Design Year turning
movement volumes. The following sections provide a summary of the future volume forecast
development.
Historic ADT Volume Growth
Historic traffic volumes were summarized based on information obtained from MnDOT. Table 1 provides
the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes along Galpin Boulevard in 2005, 2011, and 2015. Historic
growth rates were calculated for short term (2011 to 2015) and long term (2005 to 2015) time periods to
help understand the historic growth patterns that have occurred along the study corridor.
Based on the volumes, the Galpin Boulevard corridor has experienced growth ranging from 0.0% to 4.9%
over the previous ten years. On average, the corridor grew at 0.9% annually from 2005 to 2015.
TABLE 1: HISTORIC GROWTH SUMMARY
City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan Growth
Traffic volumes from the current 2040 Comprehensive Plan for the City of Chanhassen were reviewed.
Volumes were provided for Existing Year (2015), and Design Year (2040). Table 2 provides a summary of
volume growth within the project study area.
Based on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the Galpin Boulevard corridor is anticipated to experience growth
ranging from 0.6% to 1.4% annually, with an average growth rate of 0.9%.
TABLE 2: 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GROWTH SUMMARY
2005 2011 2015 2011-2015 2005-2015
Galpin Blvd Between TH 5 and Coulter Blvd 4,900 4,600 -4.8% 0.9%
Galpin Blvd Between TH 5 and 78th St 5,400 5,000 8,700 14.9% 4.9%
Galpin Blvd Between 78th St and Longacres Dr 5,400 5,000 4,350 -3.4% -2.1%
Galpin Blvd Between Longacres Dr and Pheasant Dr 2,450 2,400 2,450 0.5% 0.0%
Count Location Count Year Rate
2015 2040
Galpin Blvd Between TH 5 and Coulter Blvd 5,300 6,200 0.6%
Galpin Blvd Between TH 5 and 78th St 8,700 10,000 0.6%
Galpin Blvd Between 78th St and Longacres Dr 4,350 5,300 0.8%
Galpin Blvd Between Longacres Dr and Pheasant Dr 2,450 3,500 1.4%
Volume Location Year Rate
243
Page 4
Development Along Study Corridor
Based on discussion with City staff, the large tract of land on the east side of Galpin Boulevard between
W 78th Street and Lake Lucy Road is anticipated to be redeveloped into a residential development with
approximately 250 single family dwelling units. At this point, access to the development is expected to be
provided via a connection to the intersection of Galpin Boulevard & Longacres Drive. Based on existing
traffic counts, it is anticipated that 75% of the traffic will access the site to/from the south and 25%
to/from the north.
Recommendation
Based on the historical growth and forecasted growth in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, a 1.0% annual
background growth rate is recommended for traffic volumes along Galpin Boulevard. In addition to
background growth, traffic from the proposed residential development was also included in the future
volume forecast. Exhibit 2 provides a summary of the forecasted 2040 AM and PM peak hour turning
movement volumes at the study intersections.
The forecasted 2040 AADT along Galpin Boulevard ranges from 10,000 at the south end of the corridor to
3,500 at the north end of the corridor.
244
NOT TO SCALE
TH 5
W 78
Str
e
et
Walnut Curve
Brinker Street
Majestic Way
Hunter Drive
Longacres Drive
Wynsong Lane
Lake Harrison Road
Topaz Drive
Lake Lucy Road
Pinehurst Drive
Crestview Drive
Whitetail Ridge CourtW 65th Street
Melody Hill
Road
P
h
e
a
s
a
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
Galpin BlvdDESIGN YEAR TOTAL (2040)
P EAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
LEGEND
AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Future AADT
XX (XX)
X,XXX 135 (180) 10 (20) 5 (5)
20 (10)5 (5)170 (195)15 (15)100 (145) 25 (40) 75 (50)
30 (30)
15 (25)25 (35)40 (50)145 (180) 20 (15)
55 (55)
50 (50)445 (285) 0 (5) 20 (5)
10 (5)5 (15)190 (415)20 (15)450 (240) 45 (40) 40 (50)
30 (45)
15 (30)15 (25)75 (115)190 (415) 20 (30)
65 (50)
45 (30)65 (90)260 (200) 230 (155) 610 (1635)
65 (100)
105 (250)125 (105)55 (120)115 (235) 35 (80)
1535 (1095)
165 (80)10 (30)170 (130) 10 (40) 0 (0)
105 (70)
35 (25)35 (115)20 (15)125 (220) 20 (10)
0 (0)
45 (30)5,30010,0003,8503,500245
Page 6
APPENDIX
246
Kimley-Horn : Saint Paul (MN) 2550 University Ave W, Suite 238NSaint Paul, Minnesota, United States 55114 612.617.7993 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & PheasantDriveSite Code: Intersection 1Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimePheasant DriveGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPeds App. Total LeftThruPeds App. Total LeftThruRightPeds App. Total Int. Total6:00 AM010102020100010136:15 AM020208080130013236:30 AM050516070160016286:45 AM14051607027002739Hourly Total11201322202406600661037:00 AM140509090261027417:15 AM27094100140431044677:30 AM06061150160322034567:45 AM0606420024031103262Hourly Total3230269540630132501372268:00 AM01010290290301031618:15 AM15062320341250026668:30 AM11022180200220022448:45 AM0303127028035003566Hourly Total210012510601111112101142379:00 AM05054270310260026629:15 AM12033190220200020459:30 AM05053120150230023439:45 AM02021809018001829Hourly Total1140151166077087008717910:00 AM00001901001200122210:15 AM1203340701400142410:30 AM11020808050051510:45 AM01013508018101928Hourly Total240672603304910508911:00 AM0606240601340172911:15 AM1203070701200122211:30 AM010131401701120133111:45 AM20022140160700725Hourly Total39012739046043604910712:00 PM0101110011090092112:15 PM0202360902200223312:30 PM01014509081091912:45 PM020238011015001528Hourly Total0606112904005410551011:00 PM00001100110140014251:15 PM11022100120120012261:30 PM010141201605005221:45 PM01011708014101524Hourly Total13048390470451046972:00 PM01011809015101626247
2:15 PM04043140170160016372:30 PM0202590140160016322:45 PM0202218020023002345Hourly Total0909114906007010711403:00 PM20024270310201021543:15 PM03032160180261027483:30 PM01013190220340034573:45 PM1607227029027002763Hourly Total310013118901000107201092224:00 PM01012280300292131624:15 PM03035360410341035794:30 PM00007300370301031684:45 PM1304629035032203473Hourly Total17082012301430125611312825:00 PM12032320340422044815:15 PM14053340370370037795:30 PM12037230300260026595:45 PM4206431035029103071Hourly Total7100171612001360134301372906:00 PM02025260310270027606:15 PM02024210250210021486:30 PM02023230260210021496:45 PM0202511016024202644Hourly Total080817810980932095201Grand Total24125014913584309781111729111472274Approach %16.183.9--13.886.2--0.197.42.5---Total %1.15.5-6.65.937.1-43.00.049.11.3-50.4-Lights22124-146133826-9591108825-11142219% Lights91.799.2-98.098.598.0-98.1100.097.486.2-97.197.6Mediums21-3217-190294-3355% Mediums8.30.8-2.01.52.0-1.90.02.613.8-2.92.4Articulated Trucks00-000-0000-00% Articulated Trucks0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.00.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Road00-000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.00.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0----0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk-----------0.0--Pedestrians--0---0----1--% Pedestrians-----------100.0--248
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & PheasantDriveSite Code: Intersection 1Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 312/05/2017 6:00 AMEnding At12/05/2017 7:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total1212 959 217130 19 490 0 00 0 00 0 01242 978 2220826 133 017 2 00 0 00 0 00 0 0843 135 0T L P
164
0
0
0
6
158
Out
149
0
0
0
3
146
In
313
0
0
0
9
304
Total
Pheasant Drive [E]
R
125
0
0
0
1
124
L
24
0
0
0
2
22
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
848 1114 196219 33 520 0 00 0 00 0 0867 1147 2014Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P1 1088 25 00 29 4 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 11 1117 29 1Fake Approach [W]Total100001In000000Out100001Turning Movement Data Plot249
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & PheasantDriveSite Code: Intersection 1Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:15 AM)Start TimePheasant DriveGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPeds App. Total LeftThruPeds App. Total LeftThruRightPeds App. Total Int. Total7:15 AM27094100140431044677:30 AM06061150160322034567:45 AM06064200240311032628:00 AM0101029029030103161Total220022974083013650141246Approach %9.190.9--10.889.2--0.096.53.5---Total %0.88.1-8.93.730.1-33.70.055.32.0-57.3-PHF0.2500.714-0.6110.5630.638-0.7160.0000.7910.625-0.8010.918Lights219-21871-7901344-138238% Lights100.095.0-95.588.995.9-95.2-98.580.0-97.996.7Mediums01-113-4021-38% Mediums0.05.0-4.511.14.1-4.8-1.520.0-2.13.3Articulated Trucks00-000-0000-00% Articulated Trucks0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Road00-000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0----0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--------------Pedestrians--0---0----0--% Pedestrians--------------250
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & PheasantDriveSite Code: Intersection 1Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 5Peak Hour Data12/05/2017 7:15 AMEnding At12/05/2017 8:15 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total153 79 2323 4 70 0 00 0 00 0 0156 83 23971 8 03 1 00 0 00 0 00 0 074 9 0T L P
14
0
0
0
2
12
Out
22
0
0
0
1
21
In
36
0
0
0
3
33
Total
Pheasant Drive [E]
R
20
0
0
0
1
19
L
2
0
0
0
0
2
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
73 138 2113 3 60 0 00 0 00 0 076 141 217Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P0 134 4 00 2 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 136 5 0Fake Approach [W]Total000000In000000Out000000Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:15 AM)251
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & PheasantDriveSite Code: Intersection 1Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 6Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:15 PM)Start TimePheasant DriveGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPeds App. Total LeftThruPeds App. Total LeftThruRightPeds App. Total Int. Total4:15 PM03035360410341035794:30 PM00007300370301031684:45 PM13046290350322034735:00 PM1203232034042204481Total28010201270147013860144301Approach %20.080.0--13.686.4--0.095.84.2---Total %0.72.7-3.36.642.2-48.80.045.82.0-47.8-PHF0.5000.667-0.6250.7140.882-0.8960.0000.8210.750-0.8180.929Lights28-1020126-14601356-141297% Lights100.0100.0-100.0100.099.2-99.3-97.8100.0-97.998.7Mediums00-001-1030-34% Mediums0.00.0-0.00.00.8-0.7-2.20.0-2.11.3Articulated Trucks00-000-0000-00% Articulated Trucks0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Road00-000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0----0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--------------Pedestrians--0---0----0--% Pedestrians--------------252
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & PheasantDriveSite Code: Intersection 1Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 7Peak Hour Data12/05/2017 4:15 PMEnding At12/05/2017 5:15 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total143 146 2893 1 40 0 00 0 00 0 0146 147 293126 20 01 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0127 20 0T L P
26
0
0
0
0
26
Out
10
0
0
0
0
10
In
36
0
0
0
0
36
Total
Pheasant Drive [E]
R
8
0
0
0
0
8
L
2
0
0
0
0
2
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
128 141 2691 3 40 0 00 0 00 0 0129 144 273Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P0 135 6 00 3 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 138 6 0Fake Approach [W]Total000000In000000Out000000Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:15 PM)253
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Lake LucyRoadSite Code: Intersection 2Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeLake Lucy RoadLake Lucy RoadGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total6:00 AM00000020120600613004 126:15 AM2100313408080082 10 0012 316:30 AM0420614409270192 15 2019 436:45 AM41106147012 091110 1 21 1023 51Hourly Total663015 3 13 15131 2 30 1233 6 49 3058 1377:00 AM44109165012 080082 28 2032 617:15 AM954018 2 12 9023 1 20 5026 4 31 3038 1057:30 AM451010 4 13 13030 1 15 2018 6 35 5046 1047:45 AM10 13 4027 2 15 9026 4 27 1232 5 23 2030 115Hourly Total27 27 10064 9 46 36091 6 70 8284 17 117 120146 3858:00 AM3 18 0021 397019 8 11 2221 7 20 4031 928:15 AM6 20 2028 25 11118 5 20 3028 6 19 2027 1018:30 AM771015 14 13018 7 21 0028 4 18 0022 838:45 AM1 12 2015 1 11 10022 2 19 8029 5 17 0022 88Hourly Total17 57 5079 7 29 41177 22 71 132106 22 74 60102 3649:00 AM4 17 0021 029011 6 17 1024 2 16 0018 749:15 AM567018 046010 4 14 0018 2 15 5022 689:30 AM4400804307350083 15 5023 469:45 AM32106065011 391013 192012 42Hourly Total16 29 8053 0 16 23039 16 45 2063 8 55 12075 23010:00 AM22206012033 10 1014 3 11 4018 4110:15 AM33107284014 2 10 1013 2 10 3015 4910:30 AM11103175013 290111 3 11 2016 4310:45 AM16219156012 180092 10 5017 47Hourly Total7 12 6125 4 21 17042 8 37 2147 10 42 14066 18011:00 AM563014 06107271010 7 10 3020 5111:15 AM2020403104473014 2 16 3021 4311:30 AM23207043070 11 2013 3 16 1020 4711:45 AM26109082010 4 10 0014 4 12 3019 52Hourly Total11 15 8034 0 21 7028 10 35 6051 16 54 10080 19312:00 PM32308272011 2 10 1013 772016 4812:15 PM04307075112 0 10 3013 2 14 3019 5112:30 PM341080210318009691016 3612:45 PM12205084012 171091 10 3014 40Hourly Total7 12 9028 2 24 12138 4 35 5044 16 40 9065 1751:00 PM681015 13509283013 2 19 3024 611:15 PM381012 05308191011 1 13 4018 491:30 PM44109011021 11 1013 154010 341:45 PM352010 075012 390012 5 15 1021 55Hourly Total16 25 5046 1 16 14031 7 37 5049 9 52 12073 1992:00 PM243091420727009671014 39
254
2:15 PM23106227011 193013 5 22 4031 612:30 PM471012 184013 1 13 1015 3 17 2022 622:45 PM294015 1 10 5016 2 22 4128 2 22 4028 87Hourly Total10 23 9042 5 24 18047 6 51 8165 16 68 11095 2493:00 PM3 12 2017 2 11 3016 1 21 4126 15 16 4035 943:15 PM4 10 5019 1 11 7119 2 15 1018 9 14 11034 903:30 PM5 13 3021 256113 2 12 2016 6 23 3032 823:45 PM2 18 4024 263011 3 20 4027 4 27 5036 98Hourly Total14 53 14081 7 33 19259 8 68 11187 34 80 230137 3644:00 PM6 14 3023 4 16 15035 3 28 1132 8 20 5033 1234:15 PM493016 2 13 4019 5 30 3438 13 39 5057 1304:30 PM472013 4 10 6120 6 21 1228 8 36 5049 1104:45 PM3 14 4021 0 13 4017 8 24 3035 6 23 7036 109Hourly Total17 44 12073 10 52 29191 22 103 87133 35 118 220175 4725:00 PM5 11 5021 09 11020 6 22 3031 11 37 4052 1245:15 PM386017 2 10 5017 8 25 1034 8 30 8046 1145:30 PM4 12 7023 199019 5 18 3026 5 28 4037 1055:45 PM2 16 4022 485017 6 31 1038 9 23 6038 115Hourly Total14 47 22083 7 36 30073 25 96 80129 33 118 220173 4586:00 PM284014 192012 3 20 1024 4 24 2030 806:15 PM693018 374014 4 16 0020 7 14 3024 766:30 PM3 12 0015 195015 2 12 1015 2 16 8026 716:45 PM3 11 1115 136010 290011 6 19 2027 63Hourly Total14 40 8162 6 28 17051 11 57 2070 19 73 150107 290Grand Total 176 390 1192685 61 359 2786698 147 735 7916961 241 940 17101352 3696Approach % 25.7 56.9 17.4-- 8.7 51.4 39.8-- 15.3 76.5 8.2-- 17.8 69.5 12.6---Total %4.8 10.6 3.2-18.5 1.7 9.7 7.5-18.9 4.0 19.9 2.1-26.0 6.5 25.4 4.6-36.6 -Lights173 371 106-650 58 342 267-667 138 725 73-936 233 925 165-1323 3576% Lights98.3 95.1 89.1-94.9 95.1 95.3 96.0-95.6 93.9 98.6 92.4-97.4 96.7 98.4 96.5-97.9 96.8Mediums3 19 12-34 3 16 11-30 886-22 8 12 5-25 111% Mediums1.7 4.9 10.1-5.0 4.9 4.5 4.0-4.3 5.4 1.1 7.6-2.3 3.3 1.3 2.9-1.8 3.0Articulated Trucks 001-1010-1120-3031-49% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.8-0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0-0.1 0.7 0.3 0.0-0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6-0.3 0.2Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----1----1----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0----16.7----6.3-------Pedestrians---2----5----15----0--% Pedestrians ---100.0----83.3----93.8-------255
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Lake LucyRoadSite Code: Intersection 2Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 312/07/2017 6:00 AMEnding At12/07/2017 7:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total1089 936 202527 22 494 3 70 0 00 0 01120 961 208173 725 138 06 8 8 00 2 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 1679 735 147 16R T L P
677
0
0
3
29
645
Out
685
0
0
1
34
650
In
1362
0
0
4
63
1295
Total
Lake Lucy Road [E]
R
119
0
0
1
12
106
T
390
0
0
0
19
371
L
176
0
0
0
3
173
P
2
2
0
0
0
0
1165 1323 248822 25 472 4 60 0 00 0 01189 1352 2541Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P233 925 165 08 12 5 00 3 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 0241 940 171 0Lake Lucy Road [W]Total1344631001408In66730100698Out6773300071058300061L34216100359T26711000278R000066PTurning Movement Data Plot256
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Lake LucyRoadSite Code: Intersection 2Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:15 AM)Start TimeLake Lucy RoadLake Lucy RoadGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:15 AM954018 2 12 9023 1 20 5026 4 31 3038 1057:30 AM451010 4 13 13030 1 15 2018 6 35 5046 1047:45 AM10 13 4027 2 15 9026 4 27 1232 5 23 2030 1158:00 AM3 18 0021 397019 8 11 2221 7 20 4031 92Total26 41 9076 11 49 38098 14 73 10497 22 109 140145 416Approach % 34.2 53.9 11.8-- 11.2 50.0 38.8-- 14.4 75.3 10.3-- 15.2 75.2 9.7---Total %6.3 9.9 2.2-18.3 2.6 11.8 9.1-23.6 3.4 17.5 2.4-23.3 5.3 26.2 3.4-34.9 -PHF0.650 0.569 0.563-0.704 0.688 0.817 0.731-0.817 0.438 0.676 0.500-0.758 0.786 0.779 0.700-0.788 0.904Lights26 38 6-70 10 46 35-91 13 72 8-93 21 108 13-142 396% Lights100.0 92.7 66.7-92.1 90.9 93.9 92.1-92.9 92.9 98.6 80.0-95.9 95.5 99.1 92.9-97.9 95.2Mediums033-6133-7112-4111-3 20% Mediums0.0 7.3 33.3-7.9 9.1 6.1 7.9-7.1 7.1 1.4 20.0-4.1 4.5 0.9 7.1-2.1 4.8Articulated Trucks 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk-------------0.0-------Pedestrians---0----0----4----0--% Pedestrians -------------100.0-------257
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Lake LucyRoadSite Code: Intersection 2Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 5Peak Hour Data12/07/2017 7:15 AMEnding At12/07/2017 8:15 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total124 93 2175 4 90 0 00 0 00 0 0129 97 2268 72 13 02 1 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 410 73 14 4R T L P
77
0
0
0
5
72
Out
76
0
0
0
6
70
In
153
0
0
0
11
142
Total
Lake Lucy Road [E]
R
9
0
0
0
3
6
T
41
0
0
0
3
38
L
26
0
0
0
0
26
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
133 142 2754 3 70 0 00 0 00 0 0137 145 282Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P21 108 13 01 1 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 022 109 14 0Lake Lucy Road [W]Total15813000171In91700098Out6760007310100011L46300049T35300038R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:15 AM)258
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Lake LucyRoadSite Code: Intersection 2Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 6Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:15 PM)Start TimeLake Lucy RoadLake Lucy RoadGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total4:15 PM493016 2 13 4019 5 30 3438 13 39 5057 1304:30 PM472013 4 10 6120 6 21 1228 8 36 5049 1104:45 PM3 14 4021 0 13 4017 8 24 3035 6 23 7036 1095:00 PM5 11 5021 09 11020 6 22 3031 11 37 4052 124Total16 41 14071 6 45 25176 25 97 106132 38 135 210194 473Approach % 22.5 57.7 19.7-- 7.9 59.2 32.9-- 18.9 73.5 7.6-- 19.6 69.6 10.8---Total %3.4 8.7 3.0-15.0 1.3 9.5 5.3-16.1 5.3 20.5 2.1-27.9 8.0 28.5 4.4-41.0 -PHF0.800 0.732 0.700-0.845 0.375 0.865 0.568-0.950 0.781 0.808 0.833-0.868 0.731 0.865 0.750-0.851 0.910Lights16 41 12-69 6 43 24-73 23 97 9-129 37 133 21-191 462% Lights100.0 100.0 85.7-97.2 100.0 95.6 96.0-96.1 92.0 100.0 90.0-97.7 97.4 98.5 100.0-98.5 97.7Mediums002-2021-3201-3120-3 11% Mediums0.0 0.0 14.3-2.8 0.0 4.4 4.0-3.9 8.0 0.0 10.0-2.3 2.6 1.5 0.0-1.5 2.3Articulated Trucks 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk--------0.0----0.0-------Pedestrians---0----1----6----0--% Pedestrians --------100.0----100.0-------259
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Lake LucyRoadSite Code: Intersection 2Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 7Peak Hour Data12/07/2017 4:15 PMEnding At12/07/2017 5:15 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total151 129 2804 3 70 0 00 0 00 0 0155 132 2879 97 23 01 0 2 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 610 97 25 6R T L P
91
0
0
0
4
87
Out
71
0
0
0
2
69
In
162
0
0
0
6
156
Total
Lake Lucy Road [E]
R
14
0
0
0
2
12
T
41
0
0
0
0
41
L
16
0
0
0
0
16
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
137 191 3281 3 40 0 00 0 00 0 0138 194 332Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P37 133 21 01 2 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 038 135 21 0Lake Lucy Road [W]Total1605000165In73300076Out87200089600006L43200045T24100025R000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:15 PM)260
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & LongacresDriveSite Code: Intersection 3Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeLongacres DriveGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPedsApp. TotalThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. Total Int. Total6:00 AM002060061405116:15 AM0303140014410014316:30 AM461105005020020356:45 AM7511223002311801954Hourly Total11144254800486520581317:00 AM99018180018125026627:15 AM85013414045228030887:30 AM915024344038133034967:45 AM11701845104692303296Hourly Total2746073138901471310901223428:00 AM67013240024723030678:15 AM1516321033120021608:30 AM3407372039317020668:45 AM210332103331601955Hourly Total12171291254012914760902489:00 AM2416224026016016489:15 AM2709252027120021579:30 AM0606152017222024479:45 AM231516001641301738Hourly Total62022678808677107819010:00 AM33061400142160183810:15 AM20021400144120163210:30 AM520715001509093110:45 AM250717001721401640Hourly Total121002260006085105914111:00 AM230570073160193111:15 AM0505920111240254111:30 AM02021320152190213811:45 AM210314201611601736Hourly Total41101543604977508214612:00 PM24061510161150163812:15 PM14051400142160183712:30 PM22041500150120123112:45 PM22041110122801026Hourly Total7120195520575510561321:00 PM0101181019527032521:15 PM1405172019518023471:30 PM240615101629011331:45 PM3701015301841702149Hourly Total61602265707216710871812:00 PM26089301211301434261
2:15 PM2103181019428032542:30 PM28010181019222024532:45 PM240621302492703666Hourly Total819027668074169001062073:00 PM21132260281137048793:15 PM2406233026729036683:30 PM0101235028326029583:45 PM341722102392803767Hourly Total710217901501053012001502724:00 PM6309393042425029804:15 PM6501127100379520611094:30 PM27092010030047047864:45 PM46010171102873103876Hourly Total18210391033401372015501753515:00 PM07073630394530571035:15 PM29011324036244046935:30 PM0909263029937046845:45 PM420637604353203786Hourly Total6270331311601472016601863666:00 PM11021660221028038626:15 PM14052220241124035646:30 PM2406212023827035646:45 PM051515401932502852Hourly Total4141187414088321040136242Grand Total128237103651076123011991941191013852949Approach %35.164.9--89.710.3--14.086.0---Total %4.38.0-12.436.54.2-40.76.640.4-47.0-Lights120231-3511055119-11741861165-13512876% Lights93.897.5-96.298.096.7-97.995.997.8-97.597.5Mediums86-14154-19818-2659% Mediums6.32.5-3.81.43.3-1.64.11.5-1.92.0Articulated Trucks00-060-608-814% Articulated Trucks0.00.0-0.00.60.0-0.50.00.7-0.60.5Bicycles on Road00-000-000-00% Bicycles on Road0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Crosswalk--1---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--10.0----------Pedestrians--9---0---0--% Pedestrians--90.0----------262
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & LongacresDriveSite Code: Intersection 3Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 312/07/2017 6:00 AMEnding At12/07/2017 7:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total1285 1174 245926 19 458 6 140 0 00 0 01319 1199 2518119 1055 04 15 00 6 00 0 00 0 0123 1076 0R T P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Fake Approach [E]1286 1351 263721 26 476 8 140 0 00 0 01313 1385 2698Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T P186 1165 08 18 00 8 00 0 00 0 0194 1191 0Longacres Drive [W]Total65626000682In35114000365Out305120003171208000128L2316000237R00001010PTurning Movement Data Plot263
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & LongacresDriveSite Code: Intersection 3Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:15 AM)Start TimeLongacres DriveGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPedsApp. TotalThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. Total Int. Total7:15 AM85013414045228030887:30 AM915024344038133034967:45 AM117018451046923032968:00 AM6701324002472303067Total244406814490153191070126347Approach %35.364.7--94.15.9--15.184.9---Total %6.912.7-19.641.52.6-44.15.530.8-36.3-PHF0.6670.647-0.7080.8000.563-0.8320.5280.811-0.9260.904Lights2443-671447-15118103-121339% Lights100.097.7-98.5100.077.8-98.794.796.3-96.097.7Mediums01-102-213-47% Mediums0.02.3-1.50.022.2-1.35.32.8-3.22.0Articulated Trucks00-000-001-11% Articulated Trucks0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.00.9-0.80.3Bicycles on Road00-000-000-00% Bicycles on Road0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk-------------Pedestrians--0---0---0--% Pedestrians-------------264
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & LongacresDriveSite Code: Intersection 3Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 5Peak Hour Data12/07/2017 7:15 AMEnding At12/07/2017 8:15 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total127 151 2783 2 51 0 10 0 00 0 0131 153 2847 144 02 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 09 144 0R T P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Fake Approach [E]187 121 3081 4 50 1 10 0 00 0 0188 126 314Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T P18 103 01 3 00 1 00 0 00 0 019 107 0Longacres Drive [W]Total92400096In67100068Out2530002824000024L43100044R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:15 AM)265
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & LongacresDriveSite Code: Intersection 3Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 6Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:15 PM)Start TimeLongacres DriveGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPedsApp. TotalThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. Total Int. Total4:15 PM6501127100379520611094:30 PM27092010030047047864:45 PM460101711028731038765:00 PM0707363039453057103Total1225037100340134201830203374Approach %32.467.6--74.625.4--9.990.1---Total %3.26.7-9.926.79.1-35.85.348.9-54.3-PHF0.5000.893-0.8410.6940.773-0.8590.5560.863-0.8320.858Lights1225-379934-13319181-200370% Lights100.0100.0-100.099.0100.0-99.395.098.9-98.598.9Mediums00-010-112-34% Mediums0.00.0-0.01.00.0-0.75.01.1-1.51.1Articulated Trucks00-000-000-00% Articulated Trucks0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Road00-000-000-00% Bicycles on Road0.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk-------------Pedestrians--0---0---0--% Pedestrians-------------266
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & LongacresDriveSite Code: Intersection 3Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 7Peak Hour Data12/07/2017 4:15 PMEnding At12/07/2017 5:15 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total193 133 3262 1 30 0 00 0 00 0 0195 134 32934 99 00 1 00 0 00 0 00 0 034 100 0R T P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Fake Approach [E]124 200 3241 3 40 0 00 0 00 0 0125 203 328Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T P19 181 01 2 00 0 00 0 00 0 020 183 0Longacres Drive [W]Total90100091In37000037Out5310005412000012L25000025R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:15 PM)267
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Brinker StreetSite Code: Intersection 4Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeBrinker StreetPrivate DrivewayGalpin BoulevrdGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total6:00 AM30003000000900904004 166:15 AM00101000000 19 0019 0 17 1018 386:30 AM20103000000 16 0116 0 16 0016 356:45 AM40004000000 39 0139 0 18 0018 61Hourly Total902011 000000 83 0283 0 55 1056 1507:00 AM30205000000 44 0044 0 24 0024 737:15 AM70108000001 53 0054 0 23 0023 857:30 AM60319000000 79 0079 0 33 2035 1237:45 AM40105000000 88 0088 0 33 0033 126Hourly Total20 07127 000001 264 00265 0 113 20115 4078:00 AM40206000000 50 0050 0 30 1031 878:15 AM40105000000 50 0150 0 28 1029 848:30 AM10001000001 57 0058 0 22 1023 828:45 AM00000000001 45 0046 1 25 1027 73Hourly Total903012 000002 202 01204 1 105 40110 3269:00 AM30104000000 36 0036 0 20 1021 619:15 AM00101000000 39 0039 0 26 0026 669:30 AM10011000001 25 0126 0 23 0023 509:45 AM10001000002 23 0025 0 28 1029 55Hourly Total50217000003 123 01126 0 97 2099 23210:00 AM10001000000 24 0024 0 17 1018 4310:15 AM00101000000 24 0024 0 17 0017 4210:30 AM10001000001 20 0021 0 16 0016 3810:45 AM00000000000 25 0025 0 18 0018 43Hourly Total20103000001 93 0094 0 68 1069 16611:00 AM20002000000 19 0019 0 25 1026 4711:15 AM00000000000 20 0020 0 28 3031 5111:30 AM20002000002 25 0027 0 20 0020 4911:45 AM30003000000 17 0017 0 25 0025 45Hourly Total70007000002 81 0083 0 98 40102 19212:00 PM10102001011 17 0018 0 23 1024 4512:15 PM10001000000 23 0023 0 19 0019 4312:30 PM20002000000 21 0021 1 13 1015 3812:45 PM10001000001 22 0023 0 21 4025 49Hourly Total50106001012 83 0085 1 76 6083 1751:00 PM00101000000 17 0017 0 33 2035 531:15 PM10102000000 24 0024 0 29 0029 551:30 PM20002000000 19 0019 1 19 5025 461:45 PM40004000000 24 0024 0 31 2033 61Hourly Total70209000000 84 0084 1 112 90122 2152:00 PM00000000000 18 0018 0 27 1028 46
268
2:15 PM10001000000 25 0025 0 32 0032 582:30 PM00101000000 31 0031 0 21 2023 552:45 PM10001000000 25 0025 0 45 3048 74Hourly Total20103000000 99 0099 0 125 60131 2333:00 PM10102000001 23 0024 0 57 3060 863:15 PM00101000001 29 0030 0 49 1050 813:30 PM10001000000 32 0032 0 35 2037 703:45 PM30003000000 36 0036 0 40 1041 80Hourly Total50207000002 120 00122 0 181 70188 3174:00 PM40004000000 43 0043 0 40 1041 884:15 PM30124000001 40 0241 0 67 1068 1134:30 PM00000000001 37 0038 0 54 4058 964:45 PM30023000000 33 0233 0 53 2055 91Hourly Total10 01411 000002 153 04155 0 214 80222 3885:00 PM00000000001 48 0049 0 71 4075 1245:15 PM10203000001 48 0049 0 58 3061 1135:30 PM00000000001 40 0041 0 67 7074 1155:45 PM40004000000 47 0047 0 49 3052 103Hourly Total50207000003 183 00186 0 245 170262 4556:00 PM50005000001 21 0022 0 46 3049 766:15 PM40105000000 35 0035 0 52 4056 966:30 PM00000000000 33 0033 0 39 4043 766:45 PM00020000001 24 0225 0 36 5041 66Hourly Total901210 000002 113 02115 0 173 160189 314Grand Total95 0 258120 00101 20 1681 0101701 3 1662 8301748 3570Approach % 79.2 0.0 20.8-- 0.0 0.0 100.0-- 1.2 98.8 0.0-- 0.2 95.1 4.7---Total %2.7 0.0 0.7-3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.6 47.1 0.0-47.6 0.1 46.6 2.3-49.0 -Lights88 0 17-105 001-1 17 1637 0-1654 3 1617 81-1701 3461% Lights92.6 - 68.0-87.5 -- 100.0-100.0 85.0 97.4 --97.2 100.0 97.3 97.6-97.3 96.9Mediums708-15 000-03 35 0-38 0 37 1-38 91% Mediums7.4 - 32.0-12.5 -- 0.0-0.0 15.0 2.1 --2.2 0.0 2.2 1.2-2.2 2.5Articulated Trucks 000-0000-0090-9081-9 18% Articulated Trucks 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 -- 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.5 --0.5 0.0 0.5 1.2-0.5 0.5Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 -- 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---2----0----2----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---25.0---------20.0-------Pedestrians---6----0----8----0--% Pedestrians ---75.0---------80.0-------269
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Brinker StreetSite Code: Intersection 4Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 312/07/2017 6:00 AMEnding At12/07/2017 7:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevrd [N]Out In Total1634 1654 328845 38 838 9 170 0 00 0 01687 1701 33880 1637 17 00 35 3 00 9 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 100 1681 20 10R T L P
103
0
0
1
4
98
Out
120
0
0
0
15
105
In
223
0
0
1
19
203
Total
Brinker Street [E]
R
25
0
0
0
8
17
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
95
0
0
0
7
88
P
8
8
0
0
0
0
1726 1701 342742 38 809 9 180 0 00 0 01777 1748 3525Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P3 1617 81 00 37 1 00 8 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 03 1662 83 0Private Driveway [W]Total400004In100001Out300003000000L000000T100001R000000PTurning Movement Data Plot270
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Brinker StreetSite Code: Intersection 4Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:15 AM)Start TimeBrinker StreetPrivate DrivewayGalpin BoulevrdGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:15 AM70108000001 53 0054 0 23 0023 857:30 AM60319000000 79 0079 0 33 2035 1237:45 AM40105000000 88 0088 0 33 0033 1268:00 AM40206000000 50 0050 0 30 1031 87Total21 07128 000001 270 00271 0 119 30122 421Approach % 75.0 0.0 25.0-- NaN NaN NaN-- 0.4 99.6 0.0-- 0.0 97.5 2.5---Total %5.0 0.0 1.7-6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.2 64.1 0.0-64.4 0.0 28.3 0.7-29.0 -PHF0.750 0.000 0.583-0.778 0.000 0.000 0.000-0.000 0.250 0.767 0.000-0.770 0.000 0.902 0.375-0.871 0.835Lights18 05-23 000-01 267 0-268 0 112 3-115 406% Lights85.7 - 71.4-82.1 ----- 100.0 98.9 --98.9 - 94.1 100.0-94.3 96.4Mediums302-5000-0030-3060-6 14% Mediums 14.3 - 28.6-17.9 ----- 0.0 1.1 --1.1 - 5.0 0.0-4.9 3.3Articulated Trucks 000-0000-0000-0010-11% Articulated Trucks 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 ----- 0.0 0.0 --0.0 - 0.8 0.0-0.8 0.2Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 ----- 0.0 0.0 --0.0 - 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0-----------------Pedestrians---1----0----0----0--% Pedestrians ---100.0-----------------271
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Brinker StreetSite Code: Intersection 4Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 5Peak Hour Data12/07/2017 7:15 AMEnding At12/07/2017 8:15 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevrd [N]Out In Total117 268 3858 3 111 0 10 0 00 0 0126 271 3970 267 1 00 3 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 270 1 0R T L P
4
0
0
0
0
4
Out
28
0
0
0
5
23
In
32
0
0
0
5
27
Total
Brinker Street [E]
R
7
0
0
0
2
5
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
21
0
0
0
3
18
P
1
1
0
0
0
0
285 115 4006 6 120 1 10 0 00 0 0291 122 413Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P0 112 3 00 6 0 00 1 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 119 3 0Private Driveway [W]Total000000In000000Out000000000000L000000T000000R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:15 AM)272
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Brinker StreetSite Code: Intersection 4Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 6Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:00 PM)Start TimeBrinker StreetPrivate DrivewayGalpin BoulevrdGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total5:00 PM00000000001 48 0049 0 71 4075 1245:15 PM10203000001 48 0049 0 58 3061 1135:30 PM00000000001 40 0041 0 67 7074 1155:45 PM40004000000 47 0047 0 49 3052 103Total50207000003 183 00186 0 245 170262 455Approach % 71.4 0.0 28.6-- NaN NaN NaN-- 1.6 98.4 0.0-- 0.0 93.5 6.5---Total %1.1 0.0 0.4-1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.7 40.2 0.0-40.9 0.0 53.8 3.7-57.6 -PHF0.313 0.000 0.250-0.438 0.000 0.000 0.000-0.000 0.750 0.953 0.000-0.949 0.000 0.863 0.607-0.873 0.917Lights502-7000-03 182 0-185 0 244 17-261 453% Lights100.0 - 100.0-100.0 ----- 100.0 99.5 --99.5 - 99.6 100.0-99.6 99.6Mediums000-0000-0010-1010-12% Mediums0.0 - 0.0-0.0 ----- 0.0 0.5 --0.5 - 0.4 0.0-0.4 0.4Articulated Trucks 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Articulated Trucks 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 ----- 0.0 0.0 --0.0 - 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 ----- 0.0 0.0 --0.0 - 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---------------------Pedestrians---0----0----0----0--% Pedestrians ---------------------273
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & Brinker StreetSite Code: Intersection 4Start Date: 12/07/2017Page No: 7Peak Hour Data12/07/2017 5:00 PMEnding At12/07/2017 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevrd [N]Out In Total246 185 4311 1 20 0 00 0 00 0 0247 186 4330 182 3 00 1 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 183 3 0R T L P
20
0
0
0
0
20
Out
7
0
0
0
0
7
In
27
0
0
0
0
27
Total
Brinker Street [E]
R
2
0
0
0
0
2
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
5
0
0
0
0
5
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
187 261 4481 1 20 0 00 0 00 0 0188 262 450Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P0 244 17 00 1 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 245 17 0Private Driveway [W]Total000000In000000Out000000000000L000000T000000R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:00 PM)274
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & W 78th StreetSite Code: Intersection 5Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart Time78th Street78th StreetGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total6:00 AM11002124072 13 0015 44109 336:15 AM52007342093 14 0017 26109 426:30 AM841013 385016 9 16 2027 4 14 1019 756:45 AM40105195015 12 33 2047 9 15 3027 94Hourly Total18 72027 8 23 16047 26 76 40106 19 39 6064 2447:00 AM681015 3 11 8022 12 39 1052 11 17 3031 1207:15 AM521082 10 9021 11 47 3061 6 20 3029 1197:30 AM663015 2 13 12027 13 85 20100 15 19 0034 1767:45 AM754016 4 11 11026 4 86 3093 14 41 3058 193Hourly Total24 21 9054 11 45 40096 40 257 90306 46 97 90152 6088:00 AM261091 16 5022 9 52 4065 15 38 4057 1538:15 AM792118 497020 6 52 3061 12 23 3038 1378:30 AM931113 79 10026 5 40 4049 14 25 5044 1328:45 AM663015 296017 7 45 1053 15 25 1041 126Hourly Total24 24 7255 14 43 28085 27 189 120228 56 111 130180 5489:00 AM363012 676019 4 30 5039 14 34 1049 1199:15 AM633012 065011 6 26 6138 15 21 1037 989:30 AM463013 765018 7 24 2033 12 23 3038 1029:45 AM542011 575017 4 21 4029 11 26 4041 98Hourly Total18 19 11048 18 26 21065 21 101 171139 52 104 90165 41710:00 AM641011 161087 15 0022 8 18 2028 6910:15 AM426012 051063 15 1019 11 25 1037 7410:30 AM42006253010 6 16 4026 5 18 2025 6710:45 AM765018 286016 9 14 3026 16 20 4040 100Hourly Total21 14 12047 5 24 11040 25 60 8093 40 81 90130 31011:00 AM723012 13115484016 11 19 0030 6311:15 AM05207281011 2 19 1022 16 15 2033 7311:30 AM32207158014 2 13 1016 10 13 3026 6311:45 AM70209286016 5 25 3033 13 18 3034 92Hourly Total17 99035 6 24 16146 13 65 9087 50 65 80123 29112:00 PM571013 1 11 5017 6 10 0016 17 17 3037 8312:15 PM372012 286016 3 15 1019 20 27 3050 9712:30 PM10 52117 0 12 10022 5 12 1018 22 16 3041 9812:45 PM533011 486018 3 14 1018 26 16 4046 93Hourly Total23 22 8153 7 39 27073 17 51 3071 85 76 130174 3711:00 PM653014 284014 6 13 3022 7 14 4025 751:15 PM10 73020 476017 6 12 0018 4 21 2027 821:30 PM863017 372012 2 18 0020 11 90020 691:45 PM4 11 8023 26 10018 7 18 0025 7 14 3024 90Hourly Total28 29 17074 11 28 22061 21 61 3085 29 58 9096 3162:00 PM21104343010 580013 22 20 3045 72
275
2:15 PM342094 11 5020 4 13 4021 12 21 3036 862:30 PM734014 444012 5 16 0021 16 20 4040 872:45 PM352010 565016 5 13 1019 15 38 1054 99Hourly Total15 13 9037 16 25 17058 19 50 5074 65 99 110175 3443:00 PM353011 2 15 5022 5 30 1036 22 43 3068 1373:15 PM776020 155011 7 25 3135 21 34 6061 1273:30 PM11 78026 4 11 5020 6 26 2034 16 32 1049 1293:45 PM543012 388019 8 26 1035 21 38 4063 129Hourly Total26 23 20069 10 39 23072 26 107 71140 80 147 140241 5224:00 PM12 4 10026 3 11 6120 7 36 5148 16 54 3073 1674:15 PM9 11 8028 3 10 3016 6 29 7042 30 41 4075 1614:30 PM586019 6 11 5022 5 30 1036 22 65 7094 1714:45 PM9 12 6027 983020 8 36 0044 26 56 2084 175Hourly Total35 35 300100 21 40 17178 26 131 131170 94 216 160326 6745:00 PM665017 285015 5 21 4030 13 61 6080 1425:15 PM12 12 6030 6 12 9027 8 47 1056 26 54 5085 1985:30 PM1 11 9021 179017 5 21 3029 23 58 3084 1515:45 PM15 12 9036 8 12 9029 7 25 9041 19 65 4088 194Hourly Total34 41 290104 17 39 32088 25 114 170156 81 238 180337 6856:00 PM7 10 7024 497020 3 34 1038 24 44 7075 1576:15 PM5 11 7023 462012 2 26 5033 24 53 1078 1466:30 PM966021 2 10 6018 7 20 1028 19 43 3065 1326:45 PM10 41015 766019 6 32 1039 8 38 3049 122Hourly Total31 31 21083 17 31 21069 18 112 80138 75 178 140267 557Grand Total 314 288 1843786 161 426 2912878 304 1374 11531793 772 1509 14902430 5887Approach % 39.9 36.6 23.4-- 18.3 48.5 33.1-- 17.0 76.6 6.4-- 31.8 62.1 6.1---Total %5.3 4.9 3.1-13.4 2.7 7.2 4.9-14.9 5.2 23.3 2.0-30.5 13.1 25.6 2.5-41.3 -Lights295 285 175-755 156 419 286-861 297 1349 107-1753 765 1481 144-2390 5759% Lights93.9 99.0 95.1-96.1 96.9 98.4 98.3-98.1 97.7 98.2 93.0-97.8 99.1 98.1 96.6-98.4 97.8Mediums14 38-25 575-17 7 25 8-40 6 27 5-38 120% Mediums4.5 1.0 4.3-3.2 3.1 1.6 1.7-1.9 2.3 1.8 7.0-2.2 0.8 1.8 3.4-1.6 2.0Articulated Trucks 501-6000-0000-0110-28% Articulated Trucks 1.6 0.0 0.5-0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0-0.1 0.1Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---2----1----1----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---66.7----50.0----33.3-------Pedestrians---1----1----2----0--% Pedestrians ---33.3----50.0----66.7-------276
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & W 78th StreetSite Code: Intersection 5Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 312/05/2017 6:00 AMEnding At12/05/2017 7:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total1812 1753 356540 40 802 0 20 0 00 0 01854 1793 3647107 1349 297 08 25 7 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 3115 1374 304 3R T L P
879
0
0
0
19
860
Out
786
0
0
6
25
755
In
1665
0
0
6
44
1615
Total
78th Street [E]
R
184
0
0
1
8
175
T
288
0
0
0
3
285
L
314
0
0
5
14
295
P
3
3
0
0
0
0
1930 2390 432044 38 825 2 70 0 00 0 01979 2430 4409Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P765 1481 144 06 27 5 01 1 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0772 1509 149 078th Street [W]Total2018341002053In86117000878Out11571710011751565000161L4197000426T2865000291R000022PTurning Movement Data Plot277
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & W 78th StreetSite Code: Intersection 5Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM)Start Time78th Street78th StreetGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:30 AM663015 2 13 12027 13 85 20100 15 19 0034 1767:45 AM754016 4 11 11026 4 86 3093 14 41 3058 1938:00 AM261091 16 5022 9 52 4065 15 38 4057 1538:15 AM792118 497020 6 52 3061 12 23 3038 137Total22 26 10158 11 49 35095 32 275 120319 56 121 100187 659Approach % 37.9 44.8 17.2-- 11.6 51.6 36.8-- 10.0 86.2 3.8-- 29.9 64.7 5.3---Total %3.3 3.9 1.5-8.8 1.7 7.4 5.3-14.4 4.9 41.7 1.8-48.4 8.5 18.4 1.5-28.4 -PHF0.786 0.722 0.625-0.806 0.688 0.766 0.729-0.880 0.615 0.799 0.750-0.798 0.933 0.738 0.625-0.806 0.854Lights20 26 7-53 10 48 35-93 32 268 11-311 56 119 10-185 642% Lights90.9 100.0 70.0-91.4 90.9 98.0 100.0-97.9 100.0 97.5 91.7-97.5 100.0 98.3 100.0-98.9 97.4Mediums103-4110-2071-8020-2 16% Mediums4.5 0.0 30.0-6.9 9.1 2.0 0.0-2.1 0.0 2.5 8.3-2.5 0.0 1.7 0.0-1.1 2.4Articulated Trucks 100-1000-0000-0000-01% Articulated Trucks 4.5 0.0 0.0-1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.2Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0-----------------Pedestrians---1----0----0----0--% Pedestrians ---100.0-----------------278
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & W 78th StreetSite Code: Intersection 5Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 5Peak Hour Data12/05/2017 7:30 AMEnding At12/05/2017 8:30 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total136 311 4476 8 140 0 00 0 00 0 0142 319 46111 268 32 01 7 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 012 275 32 0R T L P
91
0
0
0
1
90
Out
58
0
0
1
4
53
In
149
0
0
1
5
143
Total
78th Street [E]
R
10
0
0
0
3
7
T
26
0
0
0
0
26
L
22
0
0
1
1
20
P
1
1
0
0
0
0
323 185 5088 2 101 0 10 0 00 0 0332 187 519Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P56 119 10 00 2 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 056 121 10 078th Street [W]Total1863000189In93200095Out9310009410100011L48100049T35000035R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM)279
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & W 78th StreetSite Code: Intersection 5Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 6Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:15 PM)Start Time78th Street78th StreetGalpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total5:15 PM12 12 6030 6 12 9027 8 47 1056 26 54 5085 1985:30 PM1 11 9021 179017 5 21 3029 23 58 3084 1515:45 PM15 12 9036 8 12 9029 7 25 9041 19 65 4088 1946:00 PM7 10 7024 497020 3 34 1038 24 44 7075 157Total35 45 310111 19 40 34093 23 127 140164 92 221 190332 700Approach % 31.5 40.5 27.9-- 20.4 43.0 36.6-- 14.0 77.4 8.5-- 27.7 66.6 5.7---Total %5.0 6.4 4.4-15.9 2.7 5.7 4.9-13.3 3.3 18.1 2.0-23.4 13.1 31.6 2.7-47.4 -PHF0.583 0.938 0.861-0.771 0.594 0.833 0.944-0.802 0.719 0.676 0.389-0.732 0.885 0.850 0.679-0.943 0.884Lights34 45 31-110 19 40 34-93 23 127 14-164 92 221 19-332 699% Lights97.1 100.0 100.0-99.1 100.0 100.0 100.0-100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0-100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0-100.0 99.9Mediums000-0000-0000-0000-00% Mediums0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Articulated Trucks 100-1000-0000-0000-01% Articulated Trucks 2.9 0.0 0.0-0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.1Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---------------------Pedestrians---0----0----0----0--% Pedestrians ---------------------280
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & W 78th StreetSite Code: Intersection 5Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 7Peak Hour Data12/05/2017 5:15 PMEnding At12/05/2017 6:15 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total271 164 4350 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0271 164 43514 127 23 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 014 127 23 0R T L P
82
0
0
0
0
82
Out
111
0
0
1
0
110
In
193
0
0
1
0
192
Total
78th Street [E]
R
31
0
0
0
0
31
T
45
0
0
0
0
45
L
35
0
0
1
0
34
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
195 332 5270 0 01 0 10 0 00 0 0196 332 528Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P92 221 19 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 092 221 19 078th Street [W]Total2440000244In93000093Out151000015119000019L40000040T34000034R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:15 PM)281
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & TH 5Site Code: Intersection 6Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeTH 5TH 5Galpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:00 AM600060 162 140176 0 20 12032 30003 2177:15 AM800080 234 130247 0 29 4033 10 00010 2987:30 AM21 00021 0 206 170223 0 59 6065 10 00010 3197:45 AM15 00015 0 198 320230 0 72 6078 17 00017 340Hourly Total50 00050 0 800 760876 0 180 280208 40 00040 11748:00 AM10 00010 0 205 330238 0 32 8040 12 00012 3008:15 AM12 00012 0 218 240242 0 23 5028 70007 2898:30 AM15 00015 0 216 160232 0 33 17050 21 00021 3188:45 AM700070 220 190239 0 27 9036 19 00019 301Hourly Total44 00044 0 859 920951 0 115 390154 59 00059 1208*** BREAK ***---------------------4:00 PM11 253 240288 10 143 111164 30 16 13059 25 41 16082 5934:15 PM12 285 380335 10 150 70167 10 26 12048 26 22 10058 6084:30 PM22 282 420346 9 203 110223 22 26 11059 23 47 12082 7104:45 PM13 288 340335 11 219 150245 21 24 17062 18 30 14062 704Hourly Total58 1108 13801304 40 715 441799 83 92 530228 92 140 520284 26155:00 PM20 251 280299 16 165 180199 9 19 11039 18 40 17075 6125:15 PM20 261 380319 10 208 100228 29 34 16079 21 35 25081 7075:30 PM24 267 390330 7 155 170179 21 11 13045 27 34 26087 6415:45 PM31 261 510343 14 118 190151 13 28 12053 16 30 13059 606Hourly Total95 1040 15601291 47 646 640757 72 92 520216 82 139 810302 2566*** BREAK ***---------------------6:00 AM3 60 4067 3 145 80156 890017 079016 2566:15 AM7 72 8187 3 208 60217 13 81022 67 10023 3496:30 AM4 78 6088 4 226 180248 21 60027 47 16027 3906:45 AM6 116 20124 6 276 140296 37 12 4053 2 10 21033 506Hourly Total20 326 201366 16 855 460917 79 35 50119 12 31 56099 15017:00 AM8 82 7097 6 296 280330 21 13 7041 6 16 25047 5157:15 AM15 103 60124 7 291 280326 33 25 14072 98 17034 5567:30 AM15 115 160146 8 311 370356 31 65 70103 11 22 14047 6527:45 AM13 138 200171 3 294 480345 38 65 90112 13 18 40071 699Hourly Total51 438 490538 24 1192 14101357 123 168 370328 39 64 960199 24228:00 AM11 129 180158 2 303 270332 42 14 10066 17 21 17055 6118:15 AM7 102 120121 8 309 180335 30 27 14071 2 17 27046 5738:30 AM16 139 122167 7 278 250310 30 28 8066 21 20 32073 6168:45 AM9 127 170153 6 247 200273 37 15 7059 12 17 17046 531Hourly Total43 497 592599 23 1137 9001250 139 84 390262 52 75 930220 23319:00 AM13 165 160194 11 186 50202 20 21 15056 68 15029 4819:15 AM5 134 210160 11 187 130211 18 10 10038 10 65021 4309:30 AM9 113 240146 14 226 110251 19 6 13038 11 13 7031 4669:45 AM9 120 150144 5 171 80184 20 15 3038 6 14 11031 397
282
Hourly Total36 532 760644 41 770 370848 77 52 410170 33 41 380112 177410:00 AM7 116 120135 14 157 80179 16 10 6032 5 10 6021 36710:15 AM13 103 80124 9 156 100175 18 14 7039 996024 36210:30 AM7 89 150111 8 177 30188 18 87033 75 11023 35510:45 AM10 128 160154 6 175 80189 19 11 11041 5 16 8029 413Hourly Total37 436 510524 37 665 290731 71 43 310145 26 40 31097 149711:00 AM5 112 250142 11 182 70200 12 13 9034 75 20032 40811:15 AM11 138 140163 13 193 90215 27 38038 8 10 15033 44911:30 AM15 153 140182 10 201 80219 20 12 7039 12 12 19043 48311:45 AM14 177 250216 10 204 80222 16 99034 8 12 28048 520Hourly Total45 580 780703 44 780 320856 75 37 330145 35 39 820156 186012:00 PM20 146 240190 15 210 50230 14 17 6037 6 19 25050 50712:15 PM16 188 120216 9 218 90236 24 7 12043 9 12 26047 54212:30 PM24 164 100198 7 162 60175 24 16 13053 7 10 24041 46712:45 PM25 186 200231 8 184 80200 23 11 12046 4 14 21039 516Hourly Total85 684 660835 39 774 280841 85 51 430179 26 55 960177 20321:00 PM26 179 240229 11 156 70174 16 13 3032 5 15 19039 4741:15 PM15 163 260204 6 180 100196 17 10 8035 11 13 11035 4701:30 PM12 188 290229 2 153 60161 16 13 11040 12 26020 4501:45 PM14 187 210222 0 176 40180 17 12 10039 24 17 15056 497Hourly Total67 717 1000884 19 665 270711 66 48 320146 52 47 510150 18912:00 PM11 192 300233 5 124 20131 18 10 10038 17 14 13044 4462:15 PM10 200 200230 6 177 60189 14 15 11040 18 10 7035 4942:30 PM11 191 220224 8 186 70201 13 12 10035 14 9 18041 5012:45 PM18 203 340255 8 132 190159 9 19 18046 31 31 22084 544Hourly Total50 786 1060942 27 619 340680 54 56 490159 80 64 600204 19853:00 PM20 258 280306 7 193 100210 12 23 9044 31 45 23099 6593:15 PM18 262 310311 8 177 60191 15 14 15044 20 33 28081 6273:30 PM21 244 250290 9 202 60217 21 17 13051 19 20 16055 6133:45 PM13 303 230339 7 190 110208 17 19 10046 21 23 19063 656Hourly Total72 1067 10701246 31 762 330826 65 73 470185 91 121 860298 25554:00 PM23 301 370361 16 186 70209 32 17 15064 30 17 15062 6964:15 PM25 326 390390 13 217 210251 19 17 12048 25 32 21078 7674:30 PM21 312 351368 19 197 170233 29 26 18073 25 40 18083 7574:45 PM15 341 290385 11 211 200242 18 29 17064 22 24 20066 757Hourly Total84 1280 14011504 59 811 650935 98 89 620249 102 113 740289 29775:00 PM19 314 481381 11 223 170251 22 30 11063 26 48 19093 7885:15 PM25 331 420398 5 237 100252 26 32 16074 18 37 28083 8075:30 PM24 291 510366 7 204 90220 25 19 17061 19 34 17070 7175:45 PM17 263 410321 9 180 110200 22 32 13067 20 25 12057 645Hourly Total85 1199 18211466 32 844 470923 95 113 570265 83 144 760303 29576:00 PM21 288 460355 6 160 150181 19 14 4037 20 19 12051 6246:15 PM33 314 410388 10 130 280168 19 20 17056 17 34 12063 6756:30 PM18 224 300272 2 138 130153 24 20 13057 11 20 20051 5336:45 PM10 211 270248 14 118 100142 14 12 8034 10 17 9036 460Hourly Total82 1037 14401263 32 546 660644 76 66 420184 58 90 530201 2292Grand Total 1004 11727 1472514203 511 13440 951114902 1258 1394 69003342 962 1203 102503190 35637Approach % 7.1 82.6 10.4-- 3.4 90.2 6.4-- 37.6 41.7 20.6-- 30.2 37.7 32.1---Total %2.8 32.9 4.1-39.9 1.4 37.7 2.7-41.8 3.5 3.9 1.9-9.4 2.7 3.4 2.9-9.0 -Lights964 11429 1437-13830 503 13076 932-14511 1225 1355 672-3252 937 1173 982-3092 34685% Lights96.0 97.5 97.6-97.4 98.4 97.3 98.0-97.4 97.4 97.2 97.4-97.3 97.4 97.5 95.8-96.9 97.3Mediums31 180 20-231 5 231 13-249 24 34 12-70 23 24 33-80 630
283
% Mediums3.1 1.5 1.4-1.6 1.0 1.7 1.4-1.7 1.9 2.4 1.7-2.1 2.4 2.0 3.2-2.5 1.8Articulated Trucks 9 118 15-142 3 133 6-142 956-20 26 10-18 322% Articulated Trucks 0.9 1.0 1.0-1.0 0.6 1.0 0.6-1.0 0.7 0.4 0.9-0.6 0.2 0.5 1.0-0.6 0.9Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---4----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---80.0----0.0------------Pedestrians---1----1----0----0--% Pedestrians ---20.0----100.0------------284
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & TH 5Site Code: Intersection 6Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 412/05/2017 7:00 AMEnding At12/07/2017 7:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total3113 3252 636549 70 11924 20 440 0 00 0 03186 3342 6528672 1355 1225 012 34 24 06 5 9 00 0 0 00 0 0 0690 1394 1258 0R T L P
15723
0
0
152
288
15283
Out
14203
0
0
142
231
13830
In
29926
0
0
294
519
29113
Total
TH 5 [E]
R
1472
0
0
15
20
1437
T
11727
0
0
118
180
11429
L
1004
0
0
9
31
964
P
5
5
0
0
0
0
3251 3092 634378 80 15820 18 380 0 00 0 03349 3190 6539Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P937 1173 982 023 24 33 02 6 10 00 0 0 00 0 0 0962 1203 1025 0TH 5 [W]Total275494642680028281In145112491420014902Out1303821512600133795035300511L130762311330013440T93213600951R000011PTurning Movement Data Plot285
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & TH 5Site Code: Intersection 6Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:15 AM)Start TimeTH 5TH 5Galpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:15 AM800080 234 130247 0 29 4033 10 00010 2987:30 AM21 00021 0 206 170223 0 59 6065 10 00010 3197:45 AM15 00015 0 198 320230 0 72 6078 17 00017 3408:00 AM10 00010 0 205 330238 0 32 8040 12 00012 300Total54 00054 0 843 950938 0 192 240216 49 00049 1257Approach % 100.0 0.0 0.0-- 0.0 89.9 10.1-- 0.0 88.9 11.1-- 100.0 0.0 0.0---Total %4.3 0.0 0.0-4.3 0.0 67.1 7.6-74.6 0.0 15.3 1.9-17.2 3.9 0.0 0.0-3.9 -PHF0.643 0.000 0.000-0.643 0.000 0.901 0.720-0.949 0.000 0.667 0.750-0.692 0.721 0.000 0.000-0.721 0.924Lights52 00-52 0 833 94-927 0 189 23-212 46 00-46 1237% Lights96.3 ---96.3 - 98.8 98.9-98.8 - 98.4 95.8-98.1 93.9 ---93.9 98.4Mediums100-1071-8030-3300-3 15% Mediums1.9 ---1.9 - 0.8 1.1-0.9 - 1.6 0.0-1.4 6.1 ---6.1 1.2Articulated Trucks 100-1030-3001-1000-05% Articulated Trucks 1.9 ---1.9 - 0.4 0.0-0.3 - 0.0 4.2-0.5 0.0 ---0.0 0.4Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 ---0.0 - 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 ---0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---------------------Pedestrians---0----0----0----0--% Pedestrians ---------------------286
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & TH 5Site Code: Intersection 6Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 6Peak Hour Data12/05/2017 7:15 AMEnding At12/05/2017 8:15 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total0 212 2120 3 30 1 10 0 00 0 00 216 21623 189 0 00 3 0 01 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 024 192 0 0R T L P
843
0
0
3
7
833
Out
54
0
0
1
1
52
In
897
0
0
4
8
885
Total
TH 5 [E]
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
54
0
0
1
1
52
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
335 46 3815 3 81 0 10 0 00 0 0341 49 390Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P46 0 0 03 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 049 0 0 0TH 5 [W]Total996114001011In9278300938Out69310073000000L8337300843T94100095R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:15 AM)287
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & TH 5Site Code: Intersection 6Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 7Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)Start TimeTH 5TH 5Galpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total4:30 PM22 282 420346 9 203 110223 22 26 11059 23 47 12082 7104:45 PM13 288 340335 11 219 150245 21 24 17062 18 30 14062 7045:00 PM20 251 280299 16 165 180199 9 19 11039 18 40 17075 6125:15 PM20 261 380319 10 208 100228 29 34 16079 21 35 25081 707Total75 1082 14201299 46 795 540895 81 103 550239 80 152 680300 2733Approach % 5.8 83.3 10.9-- 5.1 88.8 6.0-- 33.9 43.1 23.0-- 26.7 50.7 22.7---Total %2.7 39.6 5.2-47.5 1.7 29.1 2.0-32.7 3.0 3.8 2.0-8.7 2.9 5.6 2.5-11.0 -PHF0.852 0.939 0.845-0.939 0.719 0.908 0.750-0.913 0.698 0.757 0.809-0.756 0.870 0.809 0.680-0.915 0.962Lights73 1070 141-1284 46 784 53-883 79 101 55-235 80 152 67-299 2701% Lights97.3 98.9 99.3-98.8 100.0 98.6 98.1-98.7 97.5 98.1 100.0-98.3 100.0 100.0 98.5-99.7 98.8Mediums290-11 070-7220-4000-0 22% Mediums2.7 0.8 0.0-0.8 0.0 0.9 0.0-0.8 2.5 1.9 0.0-1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.8Articulated Trucks 031-4041-5000-0001-1 10% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.3 0.7-0.3 0.0 0.5 1.9-0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5-0.3 0.4Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---------------------Pedestrians---0----0----0----0--% Pedestrians ---------------------288
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & TH 5Site Code: Intersection 6Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 8Peak Hour Data12/05/2017 4:30 PMEnding At12/05/2017 5:30 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total339 235 5740 4 41 0 10 0 00 0 0340 239 57955 101 79 00 2 2 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 055 103 81 0R T L P
944
0
0
5
9
930
Out
1299
0
0
4
11
1284
In
2243
0
0
9
20
2214
Total
TH 5 [E]
R
142
0
0
1
0
141
T
1082
0
0
3
9
1070
L
75
0
0
0
2
73
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
227 299 5264 0 41 1 20 0 00 0 0232 300 532Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P80 152 67 00 0 0 00 0 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 080 152 68 0TH 5 [W]Total2088168002112In8837500895Out12059300121746000046L7847400795T53010054R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM)289
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & TH 5Site Code: Intersection 6Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 9Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM)Start TimeTH 5TH 5Galpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:30 AM15 115 160146 8 311 370356 31 65 70103 11 22 14047 6527:45 AM13 138 200171 3 294 480345 38 65 90112 13 18 40071 6998:00 AM11 129 180158 2 303 270332 42 14 10066 17 21 17055 6118:15 AM7 102 120121 8 309 180335 30 27 14071 2 17 27046 573Total46 484 660596 21 1217 13001368 141 171 400352 43 78 980219 2535Approach % 7.7 81.2 11.1-- 1.5 89.0 9.5-- 40.1 48.6 11.4-- 19.6 35.6 44.7---Total %1.8 19.1 2.6-23.5 0.8 48.0 5.1-54.0 5.6 6.7 1.6-13.9 1.7 3.1 3.9-8.6 -PHF0.767 0.877 0.825-0.871 0.656 0.978 0.677-0.961 0.839 0.658 0.714-0.786 0.632 0.886 0.613-0.771 0.907Lights44 460 63-567 20 1197 125-1342 139 165 39-343 40 75 94-209 2461% Lights95.7 95.0 95.5-95.1 95.2 98.4 96.2-98.1 98.6 96.5 97.5-97.4 93.0 96.2 95.9-95.4 97.1Mediums2 13 1-16 1 11 4-16 161-8322-7 47% Mediums4.3 2.7 1.5-2.7 4.8 0.9 3.1-1.2 0.7 3.5 2.5-2.3 7.0 2.6 2.0-3.2 1.9Articulated Trucks 0 11 2-13 091-10 100-1012-3 27% Articulated Trucks 0.0 2.3 3.0-2.2 0.0 0.7 0.8-0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0-0.3 0.0 1.3 2.0-1.4 1.1Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---------------------Pedestrians---0----0----0----0--% Pedestrians ---------------------290
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & TH 5Site Code: Intersection 6Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 10Peak Hour Data12/07/2017 7:30 AMEnding At12/07/2017 8:30 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total158 343 5014 8 123 1 40 0 00 0 0165 352 51739 165 139 01 6 1 00 0 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 040 171 141 0R T L P
1456
0
0
12
14
1430
Out
596
0
0
13
16
567
In
2052
0
0
25
30
1997
Total
TH 5 [E]
R
66
0
0
2
1
63
T
484
0
0
11
13
460
L
46
0
0
0
2
44
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
334 209 54312 7 191 3 40 0 00 0 0347 219 566Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P40 75 94 03 2 2 00 1 2 00 0 0 00 0 0 043 78 98 0TH 5 [W]Total18813321001935In13421610001368Out53917110056720100021L1197119001217T1254100130R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM)291
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & TH 5Site Code: Intersection 6Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 11Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)Start TimeTH 5TH 5Galpin BoulevardGalpin BoulevardWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total4:30 PM21 312 351368 19 197 170233 29 26 18073 25 40 18083 7574:45 PM15 341 290385 11 211 200242 18 29 17064 22 24 20066 7575:00 PM19 314 481381 11 223 170251 22 30 11063 26 48 19093 7885:15 PM25 331 420398 5 237 100252 26 32 16074 18 37 28083 807Total80 1298 15421532 46 868 640978 95 117 620274 91 149 850325 3109Approach % 5.2 84.7 10.1-- 4.7 88.8 6.5-- 34.7 42.7 22.6-- 28.0 45.8 26.2---Total %2.6 41.7 5.0-49.3 1.5 27.9 2.1-31.5 3.1 3.8 2.0-8.8 2.9 4.8 2.7-10.5 -PHF0.800 0.952 0.802-0.962 0.605 0.916 0.800-0.970 0.819 0.914 0.861-0.926 0.875 0.776 0.759-0.874 0.963Lights80 1283 153-1516 46 841 64-951 95 114 62-271 91 148 84-323 3061% Lights100.0 98.8 99.4-99.0 100.0 96.9 100.0-97.2 100.0 97.4 100.0-98.9 100.0 99.3 98.8-99.4 98.5Mediums081-90 19 0-19 030-3011-2 33% Mediums0.0 0.6 0.6-0.6 0.0 2.2 0.0-1.9 0.0 2.6 0.0-1.1 0.0 0.7 1.2-0.6 1.1Articulated Trucks 070-7080-8000-0000-0 15% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.5 0.0-0.5 0.0 0.9 0.0-0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.5Bicycles on Road 000-0000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---2----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---100.0-----------------Pedestrians---0----0----0----0--% Pedestrians ---0.0-----------------292
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Galpin Boulevard & TH 5Site Code: Intersection 6Start Date: 12/05/2017Page No: 12Peak Hour Data12/07/2017 4:30 PMEnding At12/07/2017 5:30 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGalpin Boulevard [N]Out In Total347 271 6182 3 50 0 00 0 00 0 0349 274 62362 114 95 00 3 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 062 117 95 0R T L P
1048
0
0
8
20
1020
Out
1532
0
0
7
9
1516
In
2580
0
0
15
29
2536
Total
TH 5 [E]
R
154
0
0
0
1
153
T
1298
0
0
7
8
1283
L
80
0
0
0
0
80
P
2
2
0
0
0
0
258 323 5813 2 50 0 00 0 00 0 0261 325 586Out In TotalGalpin Boulevard [S]L T R P91 148 84 00 1 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 091 149 85 0TH 5 [W]Total23872715002429In95119800978Out14368700145146000046L84119800868T64000064R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM)293
2. EXISTING YEAR (2017) SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS
294
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Existing 2017 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
1: Phaesant Drive & Galpin Blvd Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR SBL SBR NWL NWR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)4.2 4.1 0.9 0.5 6.3 2.9 2.6
Vehicles Entered 122 6 9 107 4 20 268
Vehicles Exited 121 6 9 107 4 20 267
Hourly Exit Rate 121 6 9 107 4 20 267
Input Volume 120 5 10 100 5 20 260
% of Volume 101 114 88 107 76 101 102
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)5.0 6.7 3.4 7.1 7.5 4.6 4.9 9.3 3.6 4.2 8.6 2.1
Vehicles Entered 14 42 41 22 58 10 21 105 15 22 80 11
Vehicles Exited 14 42 42 22 58 10 22 104 15 22 81 12
Hourly Exit Rate 14 42 42 22 58 10 22 104 15 22 81 12
Input Volume 15 45 40 25 60 10 25 100 15 20 76 10
% of Volume 95 93 106 88 96 98 88 104 102 111 107 117
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.9
Total Del/Veh (s)6.9
Vehicles Entered 441
Vehicles Exited 444
Hourly Exit Rate 444
Input Volume 441
% of Volume 101
295
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Existing 2017 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.4
Total Del/Veh (s)6.4 4.2 4.8 4.6 3.0 2.9 4.0
Vehicles Entered 20 42 21 117 138 9 347
Vehicles Exited 20 42 21 117 137 10 347
Hourly Exit Rate 20 42 21 117 137 10 347
Input Volume 20 45 20 116 135 10 345
% of Volume 101 93 106 101 101 98 101
4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street Performance by movement
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.1
Total Del/Veh (s)4.7 2.7 7.8 3.6 5.0 10.4 9.0
Vehicles Entered 24 10 148 4 1 268 455
Vehicles Exited 24 10 148 4 1 266 453
Hourly Exit Rate 24 10 148 4 1 266 453
Input Volume 20 10 145 5 1 270 451
% of Volume 122 98 102 76 100 99 100
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)2.6 0.1 0.2 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4
Total Del/Veh (s)7.3 9.8 4.1 7.2 9.5 2.6 1.7 2.4 0.5 0.0 4.6 4.5
Vehicles Entered 13 49 35 22 29 11 20 40 128 11 34 277
Vehicles Exited 14 49 34 22 29 11 20 40 128 11 34 276
Hourly Exit Rate 14 49 34 22 29 11 20 40 128 11 34 276
Input Volume 15 50 35 25 30 10 25 35 125 10 35 275
% of Volume 95 98 96 88 96 107 81 113 102 107 96 100
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.2
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)3.7 4.2
Vehicles Entered 14 683
Vehicles Exited 15 683
Hourly Exit Rate 15 683
Input Volume 15 686
% of Volume 102 100
296
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Existing 2017 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 3
6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5 Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.7 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.9 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.3 6.6 0.3 0.6 1.4 0.1 0.4 0.9 0.4 1.1 1.4 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)46.4 19.2 7.0 41.1 10.2 3.0 29.4 37.4 14.7 27.0 28.4 11.0
Vehicles Entered 26 1214 128 50 480 71 47 84 105 141 172 40
Vehicles Exited 25 1216 129 50 483 71 46 85 105 142 172 40
Hourly Exit Rate 25 1216 129 50 483 71 46 85 105 142 172 40
Input Volume 25 1220 130 50 485 70 45 80 100 145 177 40
% of Volume 100 100 99 100 100 101 102 106 105 98 97 101
6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5 Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr)0.2
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Delay (hr)13.5
Total Del/Veh (s)18.6
Vehicles Entered 2558
Vehicles Exited 2564
Hourly Exit Rate 2564
Input Volume 2568
% of Volume 100
Total Network Performance
Denied Delay (hr)0.2
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Delay (hr)22.2
Total Del/Veh (s)26.1
Vehicles Entered 2955
Vehicles Exited 2966
Hourly Exit Rate 2966
Input Volume 8219
% of Volume 36
297
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Existing 2017 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection: 1: Phaesant Drive & Galpin Blvd
Movement EB SB NW
Directions Served LR LR LR
Maximum Queue (ft)5 18 37
Average Queue (ft)0 1 15
95th Queue (ft)3 8 38
Link Distance (ft)2616 941 964
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road
Movement EB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)69 64 70 57 26
Average Queue (ft)35 38 30 32 7
95th Queue (ft)59 63 52 48 24
Link Distance (ft)1930 4160 2284 2616
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)200
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive
Movement EB NB
Directions Served LR LT
Maximum Queue (ft)66 22
Average Queue (ft)28 3
95th Queue (ft)54 15
Link Distance (ft)3536 2341
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
298
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Existing 2017 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection: 4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street
Movement WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LR T R LT
Maximum Queue (ft)50 78 31 83
Average Queue (ft)20 36 3 47
95th Queue (ft)43 58 18 71
Link Distance (ft)1138 1467 2341
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)150
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W
Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR UL L TR
Maximum Queue (ft)32 72 38 50 51 31 4
Average Queue (ft)10 32 12 17 14 3 0
95th Queue (ft)31 54 32 38 39 18 0
Link Distance (ft)2061 2211 1467
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Intersection: 6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L T T L T T L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)66 306 334 102 116 111 91 118 118 173 132 125
Average Queue (ft)21 146 164 38 51 59 30 52 50 77 52 55
95th Queue (ft)53 253 270 81 95 108 72 101 93 143 99 101
Link Distance (ft)4461 4461 4585 4585 3524 3524 407 407
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 300 250
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0
299
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Existing 2017 PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
1: Phaesant Drive & Galpin Blvd Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR SBL SBR NWL NWR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)4.2 3.6 4.4 1.6 0.6 5.6 3.0 2.6
Vehicles Entered 142 12 5 20 128 3 13 323
Vehicles Exited 142 12 5 20 128 3 13 323
Hourly Exit Rate 142 12 5 20 128 3 13 323
Input Volume 145 11 5 20 125 5 10 322
% of Volume 98 109 100 99 102 60 127 100
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)5.3 6.7 3.7 6.3 7.5 4.3 5.4 10.2 3.2 4.2 8.7 2.3
Vehicles Entered 9 42 31 14 35 20 38 131 27 30 92 13
Vehicles Exited 9 43 32 14 35 20 37 131 27 30 94 13
Hourly Exit Rate 9 43 32 14 35 20 37 131 27 30 94 13
Input Volume 10 45 30 15 40 20 35 130 25 30 95 10
% of Volume 88 96 108 92 88 99 106 101 107 101 99 127
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0
Total Delay (hr)1.0
Total Del/Veh (s)7.2
Vehicles Entered 482
Vehicles Exited 485
Hourly Exit Rate 485
Input Volume 485
% of Volume 100
300
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Existing 2017 PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)5.5 3.4 5.2 4.6 3.4 3.1 4.2
Vehicles Entered 10 25 14 236 107 33 425
Vehicles Exited 10 25 14 238 107 33 427
Hourly Exit Rate 10 25 14 238 107 33 427
Input Volume 10 30 15 230 110 30 425
% of Volume 98 84 92 103 97 111 100
4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street Performance by movement
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.2
Total Del/Veh (s)5.2 2.5 9.0 3.8 4.6 9.3 8.8
Vehicles Entered 4 7 281 14 4 160 470
Vehicles Exited 4 7 280 14 4 160 469
Hourly Exit Rate 4 7 280 14 4 160 469
Input Volume 5 5 276 15 5 170 476
% of Volume 80 140 102 92 80 94 99
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)1.9 0.2 0.2 1.6 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)6.7 9.6 3.5 7.7 10.8 3.2 1.3 2.2 0.6 0.1 6.2 4.8
Vehicles Entered 27 36 24 34 39 27 38 53 242 18 24 132
Vehicles Exited 26 36 25 34 39 27 38 53 242 18 24 133
Hourly Exit Rate 26 36 25 34 39 27 38 53 242 18 24 133
Input Volume 25 40 25 35 40 25 40 55 240 20 30 136
% of Volume 103 91 99 98 98 107 95 96 101 89 81 98
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.2
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.7
Total Del/Veh (s)4.2 3.6
Vehicles Entered 9 703
Vehicles Exited 9 704
Hourly Exit Rate 9 704
Input Volume 10 722
% of Volume 88 98
301
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Existing 2017 PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 3
6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5 Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.7 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.7 6.2 0.1 0.8 7.2 0.4 0.8 1.6 0.3 0.8 1.3 0.4
Total Del/Veh (s)50.5 25.5 4.8 38.9 19.6 7.9 32.4 39.6 11.6 32.3 37.1 21.2
Vehicles Entered 51 855 64 77 1302 159 86 143 80 92 128 66
Vehicles Exited 51 854 64 76 1303 158 88 141 79 92 128 66
Hourly Exit Rate 51 854 64 76 1303 158 88 141 79 92 128 66
Input Volume 50 870 65 80 1300 155 95 150 85 95 135 65
% of Volume 102 98 98 95 100 102 93 94 93 97 95 102
6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5 Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr)0.3
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Delay (hr)20.6
Total Del/Veh (s)23.5
Vehicles Entered 3103
Vehicles Exited 3100
Hourly Exit Rate 3100
Input Volume 3145
% of Volume 99
Total Network Performance
Denied Delay (hr)0.3
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Delay (hr)31.3
Total Del/Veh (s)31.2
Vehicles Entered 3471
Vehicles Exited 3471
Hourly Exit Rate 3471
Input Volume 9578
% of Volume 36
302
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Existing 2017 PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection: 1: Phaesant Drive & Galpin Blvd
Movement EB SB NW
Directions Served LR LR LR
Maximum Queue (ft)9 38 28
Average Queue (ft)0 3 10
95th Queue (ft)5 17 31
Link Distance (ft)2616 941 964
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road
Movement EB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)69 67 64 59 24
Average Queue (ft)34 34 36 32 8
95th Queue (ft)57 59 58 50 26
Link Distance (ft)1930 4160 2284 2616
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)200
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive
Movement EB NB SB
Directions Served LR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)50 16 4
Average Queue (ft)20 1 0
95th Queue (ft)46 10 3
Link Distance (ft)3536 2341
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)225
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
303
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Existing 2017 PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection: 4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street
Movement WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LR T R LT
Maximum Queue (ft)28 77 31 72
Average Queue (ft)8 46 11 39
95th Queue (ft)28 68 34 61
Link Distance (ft)1138 1467 2341
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)150
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR UL R L
Maximum Queue (ft)38 59 50 56 61 5 33
Average Queue (ft)17 29 18 22 12 0 5
95th Queue (ft)39 50 41 42 40 3 22
Link Distance (ft)2061 2211 226
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L T T L T T L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 107 352 354 115 316 324 134 149 131 123 116 124
Average Queue (ft)37 155 175 51 163 183 52 75 45 60 51 61
95th Queue (ft)80 287 291 98 264 279 112 135 93 103 92 113
Link Distance (ft)4461 4461 4585 4585 3524 3524 407 407
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 300 250
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1
304
3. DESIGN YEAR (2040) NO-ACTION/ALTERNATIVE A
SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS
305
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
2040 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
1: Phaesant Drive & Galpin Blvd Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR SBL SBR NWL NWR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)4.6 3.4 4.4 1.9 0.7 5.7 3.4 3.0
Vehicles Entered 175 5 6 11 132 5 20 354
Vehicles Exited 175 5 6 11 132 5 20 354
Hourly Exit Rate 175 5 6 11 132 5 20 354
Input Volume 170 4 5 10 135 5 20 350
% of Volume 103 111 114 107 98 95 101 101
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)6.0 7.1 3.5 7.1 8.7 5.8 6.6 10.5 4.2 4.5 9.0 2.5
Vehicles Entered 18 54 46 36 74 17 40 153 27 22 101 15
Vehicles Exited 18 53 47 36 72 16 40 152 27 23 100 15
Hourly Exit Rate 18 53 47 36 72 16 40 152 27 23 100 15
Input Volume 20 55 50 35 75 15 40 145 25 25 101 15
% of Volume 91 96 94 102 96 108 101 105 108 92 99 102
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1
Total Delay (hr)1.3
Total Del/Veh (s)7.8
Vehicles Entered 603
Vehicles Exited 599
Hourly Exit Rate 599
Input Volume 600
% of Volume 100
306
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
2040 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive/Future Development Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.9
Total Del/Veh (s)5.7 5.1 8.1 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.7 3.8 3.5 3.2 5.2
Vehicles Entered 16 50 104 34 20 159 35 10 168 11 607
Vehicles Exited 17 50 103 34 20 158 35 10 169 11 607
Hourly Exit Rate 17 50 103 34 20 158 35 10 169 11 607
Input Volume 20 45 105 35 20 145 35 10 171 10 596
% of Volume 86 111 98 97 101 109 100 98 99 107 102
4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street Performance by movement
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBT All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.6 2.3
Total Del/Veh (s)5.0 2.9 9.2 3.1 12.7 11.2
Vehicles Entered 19 11 234 4 451 719
Vehicles Exited 19 11 233 4 452 719
Hourly Exit Rate 19 11 233 4 452 719
Input Volume 20 10 219 5 445 700
% of Volume 96 107 106 76 102 103
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)1.6 0.2 0.2 1.7 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7
Total Del/Veh (s)13.5 15.4 7.7 16.2 13.4 4.5 3.7 4.1 0.7 0.0 6.1 5.3
Vehicles Entered 22 59 43 29 43 13 29 47 203 17 46 451
Vehicles Exited 22 59 43 28 44 13 30 47 203 17 47 453
Hourly Exit Rate 22 59 43 28 44 13 30 47 203 17 47 453
Input Volume 20 65 45 30 40 15 30 45 190 15 45 450
% of Volume 111 91 96 93 111 88 100 104 107 115 104 101
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.2
Total Delay (hr)0.0 1.6
Total Del/Veh (s)4.0 5.7
Vehicles Entered 22 1024
Vehicles Exited 23 1029
Hourly Exit Rate 23 1029
Input Volume 20 1008
% of Volume 116 102
307
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
2040 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 3
6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5 Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.7 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.6 12.3 0.5 1.1 2.5 0.1 0.6 1.6 1.0 2.7 3.4 0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)59.1 28.2 9.9 61.6 14.4 4.1 39.7 53.1 29.9 42.5 44.2 27.1
Vehicles Entered 34 1514 161 64 599 113 51 106 123 227 276 69
Vehicles Exited 32 1522 160 64 603 113 50 104 123 227 276 69
Hourly Exit Rate 32 1522 160 64 603 113 50 104 123 227 276 69
Input Volume 35 1535 165 65 610 105 55 115 125 230 262 65
% of Volume 91 99 97 99 99 107 90 91 98 99 106 107
6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5 Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr)0.3
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Delay (hr)26.9
Total Del/Veh (s)28.3
Vehicles Entered 3337
Vehicles Exited 3343
Hourly Exit Rate 3343
Input Volume 3367
% of Volume 99
Total Network Performance
Denied Delay (hr)0.4
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Delay (hr)41.5
Total Del/Veh (s)36.7
Vehicles Entered 3894
Vehicles Exited 3895
Hourly Exit Rate 3895
Input Volume 11290
% of Volume 34
308
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
2040 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection: 1: Phaesant Drive & Galpin Blvd
Movement EB SB NW
Directions Served LR LR LR
Maximum Queue (ft)9 32 32
Average Queue (ft)0 2 15
95th Queue (ft)5 15 37
Link Distance (ft)2616 941 964
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road
Movement EB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 73 80 74 62 25
Average Queue (ft)38 45 39 33 9
95th Queue (ft)61 71 63 52 28
Link Distance (ft)1930 4160 2280 2616
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)200
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive/Future Development Driveway
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 60 82 36 14
Average Queue (ft)28 44 3 1
95th Queue (ft)53 69 17 7
Link Distance (ft)3535 1821 2335 2280
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
309
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
2040 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection: 4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street
Movement WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LR T R LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 42 90 31 119
Average Queue (ft)17 46 4 60
95th Queue (ft)39 73 20 94
Link Distance (ft)1138 1467 2335
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)150
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR UL T L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 46 91 60 62 71 3 38 14
Average Queue (ft)14 40 16 22 24 0 8 0
95th Queue (ft)38 71 43 44 53 0 29 5
Link Distance (ft)2061 2211 226 1467
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 200 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
310
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
2040 AM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 6
Intersection: 6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T R L T T L T TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft)92 488 486 23 140 170 181 105 139 171 258 221
Average Queue (ft)31 272 287 1 57 88 96 37 72 77 147 107
95th Queue (ft)71 418 431 17 115 155 164 83 128 139 238 185
Link Distance (ft)4461 4461 4585 4585 3524 3524 407
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 350 300 250
Storage Blk Time (%)3 3 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 6 1 0
Intersection: 6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5
Movement SB
Directions Served TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 207
Average Queue (ft) 111
95th Queue (ft)183
Link Distance (ft)407
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 8
311
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Future 2040 No Build PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
1: Phaesant Drive & Galpin Blvd Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR SBL SBR NWL NWR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4
Total Del/Veh (s)4.6 4.0 3.9 1.6 1.0 6.6 2.7 2.9
Vehicles Entered 199 20 5 22 177 5 9 437
Vehicles Exited 199 20 5 21 177 5 9 436
Hourly Exit Rate 199 20 5 21 177 5 9 436
Input Volume 195 20 5 20 180 5 10 436
% of Volume 102 98 100 104 98 100 88 100
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)6.2 7.2 3.9 7.2 8.2 5.6 7.7 11.4 5.5 5.4 9.9 2.6
Vehicles Entered 14 55 50 27 51 28 49 180 37 43 137 14
Vehicles Exited 14 54 50 28 50 28 49 182 36 42 137 14
Hourly Exit Rate 14 54 50 28 50 28 49 182 36 42 137 14
Input Volume 15 55 50 30 50 25 50 180 35 40 145 15
% of Volume 95 98 100 93 100 112 98 101 102 106 94 95
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1
Total Delay (hr)1.6
Total Del/Veh (s)8.4
Vehicles Entered 685
Vehicles Exited 684
Hourly Exit Rate 684
Input Volume 690
% of Volume 99
312
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Future 2040 No Build PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive/Future Development Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.2
Total Del/Veh (s)7.5 3.5 8.6 4.8 7.1 6.4 5.5 5.7 4.0 3.5 5.7
Vehicles Entered 6 31 71 23 12 296 112 43 143 30 767
Vehicles Exited 7 31 72 24 12 296 111 43 142 29 767
Hourly Exit Rate 7 31 72 24 12 296 111 43 142 29 767
Input Volume 10 30 70 25 15 290 115 40 155 30 781
% of Volume 68 102 103 97 81 102 96 108 92 96 98
4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street Performance by movement
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.5
Total Del/Veh (s)4.3 2.7 12.5 6.3 6.9 10.5 11.5
Vehicles Entered 5 8 462 14 4 270 763
Vehicles Exited 5 8 461 14 4 272 764
Hourly Exit Rate 5 8 461 14 4 272 764
Input Volume 5 5 461 15 5 285 776
% of Volume 95 152 100 95 76 96 98
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)2.2 0.1 0.2 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)15.2 15.1 6.9 14.2 15.0 6.9 1.9 2.7 0.9 0.1 7.6 5.2
Vehicles Entered 30 47 33 41 50 31 52 63 419 21 32 232
Vehicles Exited 31 46 33 41 50 31 52 63 419 20 33 232
Hourly Exit Rate 31 46 33 41 50 31 52 63 419 20 33 232
Input Volume 30 50 30 45 50 30 50 70 420 25 40 240
% of Volume 102 92 109 91 100 102 103 90 100 80 83 97
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.0 1.4
Total Del/Veh (s)4.1 4.8
Vehicles Entered 16 1067
Vehicles Exited 16 1067
Hourly Exit Rate 16 1067
Input Volume 15 1096
% of Volume 108 97
313
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Future 2040 No Build PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 3
6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5 Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Delay (hr)1.5 12.8 0.2 1.5 18.9 1.1 1.6 3.8 0.8 2.4 2.8 1.0
Total Del/Veh (s)69.2 41.5 7.6 53.4 40.0 16.1 46.0 54.5 26.9 54.2 50.7 39.1
Vehicles Entered 77 1084 84 96 1651 240 122 243 108 150 197 88
Vehicles Exited 78 1086 84 93 1666 240 123 241 107 155 195 88
Hourly Exit Rate 78 1086 84 93 1666 240 123 241 107 155 195 88
Input Volume 80 1095 80 100 1635 250 120 235 105 155 200 90
% of Volume 97 99 105 93 102 96 102 103 102 100 97 98
6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5 Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr)0.5
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4
Total Delay (hr)48.3
Total Del/Veh (s)40.9
Vehicles Entered 4140
Vehicles Exited 4156
Hourly Exit Rate 4156
Input Volume 4146
% of Volume 100
Total Network Performance
Denied Delay (hr)0.5
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4
Total Delay (hr)67.7
Total Del/Veh (s)49.5
Vehicles Entered 4685
Vehicles Exited 4703
Hourly Exit Rate 4703
Input Volume 13382
% of Volume 35
314
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Future 2040 No Build PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection: 1: Phaesant Drive & Galpin Blvd
Movement EB SB NW
Directions Served LR LR LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 27 26 32
Average Queue (ft)1 2 10
95th Queue (ft)12 14 31
Link Distance (ft)2616 941 964
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road
Movement EB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 59 74 75 66 26
Average Queue (ft)38 42 43 37 9
95th Queue (ft)58 67 68 58 28
Link Distance (ft)1930 4160 2280 2616
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)200
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive/Future Development Driveway
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 55 80 35 40
Average Queue (ft)19 39 2 11
95th Queue (ft)43 66 16 32
Link Distance (ft)3535 1821 2335 2280
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
315
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Future 2040 No Build PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection: 4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street
Movement WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LR T R LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 32 145 31 79
Average Queue (ft)11 72 11 44
95th Queue (ft)32 115 35 66
Link Distance (ft)1138 1467 2335
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)150
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Intersection: 5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W
Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR UL L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 57 79 73 83 69 43 4
Average Queue (ft)21 37 22 29 20 8 0
95th Queue (ft)47 66 48 61 51 31 3
Link Distance (ft)2061 2211 1467
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 200 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
316
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction
Future 2040 No Build PM Peak
January 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 6
Intersection: 6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T L T T R L T TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 230 530 543 315 767 769 548 184 266 260 220 185
Average Queue (ft) 75 286 308 75 368 384 55 84 149 104 115 95
95th Queue (ft)167 457 480 206 645 658 326 153 232 200 197 153
Link Distance (ft)4461 4461 4585 4585 3524 3524 407
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 350 300 250
Storage Blk Time (%)5 7 9 11 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)4 6 9 27 0 0
Intersection: 6: Galpin Blvd & TH 5
Movement SB
Directions Served TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 209
Average Queue (ft) 108
95th Queue (ft)175
Link Distance (ft)407
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 46
317
4. DESIGN YEAR (2040) ALTERNATIVE B SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS
318
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard - Alternative B
AM Peak Hour
March 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)6.7 8.8 4.3 9.2 9.0 5.9 2.0 1.3 0.7 1.7 1.1 0.9
Vehicles Entered 20 52 50 31 73 16 33 151 23 30 109 14
Vehicles Exited 19 52 50 32 72 16 33 150 23 30 109 15
Hourly Exit Rate 19 52 50 32 72 16 33 150 23 30 109 15
Input Volume 20 55 50 35 75 15 40 145 25 25 101 15
% of Volume 96 94 100 91 96 108 83 103 92 120 108 102
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.7
Total Del/Veh (s)3.8
Vehicles Entered 602
Vehicles Exited 601
Hourly Exit Rate 601
Input Volume 600
% of Volume 100
3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive/Future Development Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)6.0 4.7 7.6 4.9 1.8 1.4 1.0 1.8 1.5 0.3 3.1
Vehicles Entered 20 44 103 35 20 141 37 11 174 10 595
Vehicles Exited 20 43 103 34 20 140 38 11 176 9 594
Hourly Exit Rate 20 43 103 34 20 140 38 11 176 9 594
Input Volume 20 45 105 35 20 145 35 10 171 10 596
% of Volume 101 96 98 97 101 96 109 107 103 88 100
319
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard - Alternative B
AM Peak Hour
March 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street Performance by movement
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBT All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)7.8 3.0 0.8 0.6 1.4 1.5
Vehicles Entered 23 13 214 5 441 696
Vehicles Exited 24 13 214 5 442 698
Hourly Exit Rate 24 13 214 5 442 698
Input Volume 20 10 219 5 445 700
% of Volume 122 127 98 95 99 100
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)1.8 0.2 0.2 1.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)14.2 14.9 7.7 12.3 12.5 3.6 2.8 4.1 0.7 0.1 3.0 1.9
Vehicles Entered 19 65 40 29 42 16 27 48 183 16 44 450
Vehicles Exited 19 64 41 29 43 16 27 49 183 16 45 449
Hourly Exit Rate 19 64 41 29 43 16 27 49 183 16 45 449
Input Volume 20 65 45 30 40 15 30 45 190 15 45 450
% of Volume 96 99 91 96 108 108 90 109 96 108 100 100
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.2
Total Delay (hr)0.0 1.1
Total Del/Veh (s)0.9 3.9
Vehicles Entered 19 998
Vehicles Exited 19 1000
Hourly Exit Rate 19 1000
Input Volume 20 1008
% of Volume 96 99
320
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard - Alternative B
AM Peak Hour
March 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 3
Total Zone Performance
Denied Delay (hr)0.1
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Delay (hr)2.6
Total Del/Veh (s)120.0
Vehicles Entered 921
Vehicles Exited 46
Hourly Exit Rate 46
Input Volume 2904
% of Volume 2
321
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard - Alternative B
AM Peak Hour
March 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection: 2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road
Movement EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L R L
Maximum Queue (ft)69 84 28 5 30
Average Queue (ft)39 38 3 0 3
95th Queue (ft)61 68 17 2 18
Link Distance (ft)1924 4142
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)150 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive/Future Development Driveway
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L L
Maximum Queue (ft)74 88 21 23
Average Queue (ft)26 41 2 1
95th Queue (ft)50 70 15 9
Link Distance (ft)3529 1807
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street
Movement WB
Directions Served LR
Maximum Queue (ft)41
Average Queue (ft)21
95th Queue (ft)43
Link Distance (ft)1138
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
322
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard - Alternative B
AM Peak Hour
March 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection: 5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR UL R L T R
Maximum Queue (ft)36 99 49 54 81 3 43 4 9
Average Queue (ft)13 37 17 23 24 0600
95th Queue (ft)36 70 42 43 60 2 28 3 5
Link Distance (ft)2054 2211 226 1467
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 200 100 100
Storage Blk Time (%)1
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0
323
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard - Alternative B
PM Peak Hour
March 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)9.3 8.9 4.6 10.1 9.9 5.6 2.5 2.6 1.5 2.3 1.1 0.7
Vehicles Entered 15 56 48 28 48 26 51 190 39 44 143 15
Vehicles Exited 15 56 47 28 48 26 50 189 39 43 144 14
Hourly Exit Rate 15 56 47 28 48 26 50 189 39 43 144 14
Input Volume 15 55 50 30 50 25 50 180 35 40 145 15
% of Volume 102 101 94 93 96 104 100 105 111 108 99 95
2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1
Total Delay (hr)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)3.9
Vehicles Entered 703
Vehicles Exited 699
Hourly Exit Rate 699
Input Volume 690
% of Volume 101
3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive/Future Development Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6
Total Del/Veh (s)8.7 3.9 7.9 4.0 2.4 2.1 1.8 2.7 1.2 1.2 2.7
Vehicles Entered 11 29 72 23 13 302 109 39 153 27 778
Vehicles Exited 10 30 73 24 12 302 109 39 154 27 780
Hourly Exit Rate 10 30 73 24 12 302 109 39 154 27 780
Input Volume 10 30 70 25 15 290 115 40 155 30 781
% of Volume 98 99 104 97 81 104 95 98 99 89 100
324
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard - Alternative B
PM Peak Hour
March 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street Performance by movement
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)7.4 4.0 1.2 0.9 3.2 1.1 1.2
Vehicles Entered 3 6 466 13 4 293 785
Vehicles Exited 3 6 466 13 4 295 787
Hourly Exit Rate 3 6 466 13 4 295 787
Input Volume 5 5 461 15 5 285 776
% of Volume 57 114 101 88 76 104 101
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)2.3 0.1 0.2 1.7 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)13.9 15.8 5.9 17.4 15.0 6.7 2.0 2.9 0.9 0.1 4.1 1.7
Vehicles Entered 33 47 31 40 52 29 48 73 425 22 40 248
Vehicles Exited 33 46 31 40 51 29 48 73 425 22 39 249
Hourly Exit Rate 33 46 31 40 51 29 48 73 425 22 39 249
Input Volume 30 50 30 45 50 30 50 70 420 25 40 240
% of Volume 109 92 102 89 102 96 96 104 101 88 98 104
5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W Performance by movement
Movement SBR All
Denied Delay (hr)0.0 0.0
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2
Total Delay (hr)0.0 1.2
Total Del/Veh (s)0.6 3.9
Vehicles Entered 14 1102
Vehicles Exited 14 1100
Hourly Exit Rate 14 1100
Input Volume 15 1096
% of Volume 95 100
325
SimTraffic Performance Report Galpin Boulevard - Alternative B
PM Peak Hour
March 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 3
Total Zone Performance
Denied Delay (hr)0.1
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4
Total Delay (hr)2.8
Total Del/Veh (s)58.9
Vehicles Entered 685
Vehicles Exited 145
Hourly Exit Rate 145
Input Volume 3342
% of Volume 4
326
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard - Alternative B
PM Peak Hour
March 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection: 2: Galpin Blvd & Lake Lucy Road
Movement EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L
Maximum Queue (ft)76 95 25 2 41
Average Queue (ft)39 42 6 0 7
95th Queue (ft)63 73 21 2 28
Link Distance (ft)1924 4154 2278
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Galpin Blvd & Longacres Drive/Future Development Driveway
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L L
Maximum Queue (ft)54 79 16 42
Average Queue (ft)23 35 1 7
95th Queue (ft)46 63 7 26
Link Distance (ft)3529 1807
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 4: Galpin Blvd & Brinker Street
Movement WB SB
Directions Served LR L
Maximum Queue (ft)28 27
Average Queue (ft)8 1
95th Queue (ft)28 11
Link Distance (ft)1138
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)150
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
327
Queuing and Blocking Report Galpin Boulevard - Alternative B
PM Peak Hour
March 2018 SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection: 5: Galpin Blvd & 78th Street W
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR UL T R L
Maximum Queue (ft)54 68 63 84 74 3 11 45
Average Queue (ft)21 31 22 28 26 0 0 11
95th Queue (ft)46 58 49 55 59 2 5 34
Link Distance (ft)2054 2211 226 226
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0
328
5. DESIGN YEAR (2040) ALTERNATIVE C RODEL REPORTS
329
Page 1 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Scheme Summary
Control Data
Control Data and Model Parameters
Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd 2040 PHF Flow Profile (veh)
2040 AM Peak 7.5 min Time Slice
Rodel-Win1 Queuing Delays (sec)
Right Hand Drive Daylight conditions
AM Peak Hour Peak 60/15 min Results
Full Geometry Output flows: Vehicles
English Units (ft)50% Confidence Level
Available Data
Entry Capacity Calibrated No
Entry Capacity Modified No
Crosswalks No
Flows Factored No
Approach/Exit Road Capacity Calibrated No
Accidents No
Accident Costs No
Bypass Model No
Bypass Calibration No
Global Results Yes
330
Page 2 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Data
Main Geometry (ft)
Approach and Entry Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Approach
Bearing
(deg)
Grade
Separation
G
Half Width
V
Approach
Lanes
n
Entry
Width
E
Entry
Lanes
n
Flare
Length
L'
Entry
Radius
R
Entry
Angle
?
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
2 Lake Lucy Rd
EB
90 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
3 Galpin Blvd NB 180 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
4 Lake Lucy Rd
WB
270 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
Circulating and Exit Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Inscribed
Diameter
D
Circulating
Width
C
Circulating
Lanes
nc
Exit
Width
Ex
Exit
Lanes
nex
Exit
Half Width
Vx
Exit Half
Width Lanes
nvx
1 Galpin Blvd SB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
2 Lake Lucy Rd
EB
164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
3 Galpin Blvd NB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
4 Lake Lucy Rd
WB
164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
Capacity Modifiers and Capacity Calibration (veh/hr)
Leg Leg Names
Entry Capacity
Capacity
+ or -
XWalk
Factor
Entry Calibration
Intercept
+ or -
Slope
Factor
Approach Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
Exit Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
2 Lake Lucy Rd
EB
0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
3 Galpin Blvd NB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
4 Lake Lucy Rd
WB
0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
331
Page 3 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Traffic Flow Data (veh/hr)
2040 AM Peak Peak Hour Flows
Leg Leg Names
Turning Flows
U-Turn Exit-3 Exit-2 Exit-1 Bypass
Flow Modifiers
Trucks
%
Flow
Factor
Peak Hour
Factor
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 25 100 15 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
2 Lake Lucy Rd
EB
0 20 55 50 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
3 Galpin Blvd NB 0 40 145 25 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
4 Lake Lucy Rd
WB
0 35 75 15 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
332
Page 4 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Results
2040 AM Peak - 60 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 140 150 180 1024 0.1387
2 Lake Lucy Rd EB None 125 160 130 1019 0.1244
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 210 100 185 1049 0.2032
4 Lake Lucy Rd WB None 125 205 105 997 0.1272
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 3.81 3.81 0.45 A A
2 Lake Lucy Rd EB None 3.77 3.77 0.40 A A
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 3.99 3.99 0.72 A A
4 Lake Lucy Rd WB None 3.86 3.86 0.41 A A
333
Page 5 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
2040 AM Peak - 15 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 157 168 202 1015 0.1562
2 Lake Lucy Rd EB None 140 180 146 1009 0.1402
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 236 112 208 1042 0.2282
4 Lake Lucy Rd WB None 140 230 118 985 0.1438
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 3.76 3.76 0.45 A A
2 Lake Lucy Rd EB None 3.72 3.72 0.40 A A
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 3.96 3.96 0.72 A A
4 Lake Lucy Rd WB None 3.82 3.82 0.41 A A
334
Page 6 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Approach Flow Profile
2040 AM Peak - Approach Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB Lake Lucy Rd EB Galpin Blvd NB Lake Lucy Rd WB
0.0 - 7.5 16.78 14.98 25.17 14.98
7.5 - 15.0 16.78 14.98 25.17 14.98
15.0 - 22.5 16.78 14.98 25.17 14.98
22.5 - 30.0 19.66 17.56 29.49 17.56
30.0 - 37.5 19.66 17.56 29.49 17.56
37.5 - 45.0 16.78 14.98 25.17 14.98
45.0 - 52.5 16.78 14.98 25.17 14.98
52.5 - 60.0 16.78 14.98 25.17 14.98
Peak 15 min 19.66 17.56 29.49 17.56
Peak 60 min 17.50 15.63 26.25 15.63
Exit Flow Profile
2040 AM Peak - Exit Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB Lake Lucy Rd EB Galpin Blvd NB Lake Lucy Rd WB
0.0 - 7.5 21.56 15.57 22.16 12.58
7.5 - 15.0 21.57 15.58 22.17 12.58
15.0 - 22.5 21.57 15.58 22.17 12.58
22.5 - 30.0 25.26 18.24 25.96 14.74
30.0 - 37.5 25.28 18.26 25.98 14.75
37.5 - 45.0 21.59 15.59 22.19 12.60
45.0 - 52.5 21.57 15.58 22.17 12.58
52.5 - 60.0 21.57 15.58 22.17 12.58
0-60 180 130 185 105
%Trucks 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
335
Page 7 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Economics
Economic Input Data
2040 - Vehicle Delay Parameters
Peaks Peak / Day Days / Year Delay Cost
($ / hour)
AM Peak 1 325 15.00
OFF Peak 14 325 15.00
PM Peak 1 325 15.00
2040 - Accident Severity Proportions and Costs
Accident Type Proportion (%)Cost ($)
Fatal Vehicle Accident 0.3 0
Incapacitating Vehicle Accident 17.7 0
Non-incapacitating Vehicle Accident 82 0
Damage Only Vehicle Accident 100 0
Pedestrian Injury Accident 100 0
Economics - Results Data
2040 Delay and Accident Costs
Delay Costs
Peak Delays
Veh.hrs
Costs
($)
Accident Costs
Accident
Types
Annual
Accidents
Accident
Costs
Total Costs
Cost
Type
Costs
($/year)
AM 209.90 3148 Vehicles Injury 0.00 0 Vehicle Delay Cost 3148
OFF 0.00 0 Vehicles DO 0.00 0 Vehicle Injury Acc Cost 0
PM 0.00 0 Pedestrians 0.00 0 Vehicle DO Acc Cost 0
Pedestrian Accident Cost 0
Total Accident Cost 0
Total 209.90 3148 Totals 0.00 0 TOTAL COST 3148
336
Page 8 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Global Results
Performance and Accidents
2040 AM Peak Global Performance
Parameter Units Entries Bypasses Total
Arrive Flows veh/hr 600 600
Capacity veh/hr 4088 4088
Average Delay sec/veh 3.87 3.87
L.O.S. (Signal)A – F A A
L.O.S. (Unsig)A – F A A
Total Delay veh.hrs 0.65 0.65
337
Page 1 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Scheme Summary
Control Data
Control Data and Model Parameters
Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd 2040 PHF Flow Profile (veh)
2040 PM Peak 7.5 min Time Slice
Rodel-Win1 Queuing Delays (sec)
Right Hand Drive Daylight conditions
PM Peak Hour Peak 60/15 min Results
Full Geometry Output flows: Vehicles
English Units (ft)50% Confidence Level
Available Data
Entry Capacity Calibrated No
Entry Capacity Modified No
Crosswalks No
Flows Factored No
Approach/Exit Road Capacity Calibrated No
Accidents No
Accident Costs No
Bypass Model No
Bypass Calibration No
Global Results Yes
338
Page 2 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Data
Main Geometry (ft)
Approach and Entry Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Approach
Bearing
(deg)
Grade
Separation
G
Half Width
V
Approach
Lanes
n
Entry
Width
E
Entry
Lanes
n
Flare
Length
L'
Entry
Radius
R
Entry
Angle
?
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
2 Lake Lucy Rd
EB
90 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
3 Galpin Blvd NB 180 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
4 Lake Lucy Rd
WB
270 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
Circulating and Exit Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Inscribed
Diameter
D
Circulating
Width
C
Circulating
Lanes
nc
Exit
Width
Ex
Exit
Lanes
nex
Exit
Half Width
Vx
Exit Half
Width Lanes
nvx
1 Galpin Blvd SB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
2 Lake Lucy Rd
EB
164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
3 Galpin Blvd NB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
4 Lake Lucy Rd
WB
164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
Capacity Modifiers and Capacity Calibration (veh/hr)
Leg Leg Names
Entry Capacity
Capacity
+ or -
XWalk
Factor
Entry Calibration
Intercept
+ or -
Slope
Factor
Approach Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
Exit Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
2 Lake Lucy Rd
EB
0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
3 Galpin Blvd NB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
4 Lake Lucy Rd
WB
0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
339
Page 3 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Traffic Flow Data (veh/hr)
2040 PM Peak Peak Hour Flows
Leg Leg Names
Turning Flows
U-Turn Exit-3 Exit-2 Exit-1 Bypass
Flow Modifiers
Trucks
%
Flow
Factor
Peak Hour
Factor
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 40 145 15 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
2 Lake Lucy Rd
EB
0 15 55 50 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
3 Galpin Blvd NB 0 50 180 35 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
4 Lake Lucy Rd
WB
0 30 50 25 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
340
Page 4 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Results
2040 PM Peak - 60 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 200 130 220 1034 0.1954
2 Lake Lucy Rd EB None 120 215 115 992 0.1221
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 265 110 225 1044 0.2566
4 Lake Lucy Rd WB None 105 245 130 977 0.1085
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 4.04 4.04 0.63 A A
2 Lake Lucy Rd EB None 3.88 3.88 0.36 A A
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 4.30 4.30 0.89 A A
4 Lake Lucy Rd WB None 3.88 3.88 0.32 A A
341
Page 5 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
2040 PM Peak - 15 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 211 137 232 1030 0.2061
2 Lake Lucy Rd EB None 126 226 121 986 0.1291
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 279 116 237 1041 0.2705
4 Lake Lucy Rd WB None 111 258 137 971 0.1148
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 4.01 4.01 0.63 A A
2 Lake Lucy Rd EB None 3.85 3.85 0.36 A A
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 4.29 4.29 0.89 A A
4 Lake Lucy Rd WB None 3.85 3.85 0.32 A A
342
Page 6 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Approach Flow Profile
2040 PM Peak - Approach Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB Lake Lucy Rd EB Galpin Blvd NB Lake Lucy Rd WB
0.0 - 7.5 24.56 14.74 32.54 12.89
7.5 - 15.0 24.56 14.74 32.54 12.89
15.0 - 22.5 24.56 14.74 32.54 12.89
22.5 - 30.0 26.32 15.79 34.87 13.82
30.0 - 37.5 26.32 15.79 34.87 13.82
37.5 - 45.0 24.56 14.74 32.54 12.89
45.0 - 52.5 24.56 14.74 32.54 12.89
52.5 - 60.0 24.56 14.74 32.54 12.89
Peak 15 min 26.32 15.79 34.87 13.82
Peak 60 min 25.00 15.00 33.12 13.13
Exit Flow Profile
2040 PM Peak - Exit Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB Lake Lucy Rd EB Galpin Blvd NB Lake Lucy Rd WB
0.0 - 7.5 27.01 14.12 27.62 15.96
7.5 - 15.0 27.02 14.12 27.63 15.96
15.0 - 22.5 27.02 14.12 27.63 15.96
22.5 - 30.0 28.94 15.13 29.59 17.10
30.0 - 37.5 28.95 15.13 29.61 17.11
37.5 - 45.0 27.03 14.13 27.64 15.97
45.0 - 52.5 27.02 14.12 27.63 15.96
52.5 - 60.0 27.02 14.12 27.63 15.96
0-60 220 115 225 130
%Trucks 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
343
Page 7 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Economics
Economic Input Data
2040 - Vehicle Delay Parameters
Peaks Peak / Day Days / Year Delay Cost
($ / hour)
AM Peak 1 325 15.00
OFF Peak 14 325 15.00
PM Peak 1 325 15.00
2040 - Accident Severity Proportions and Costs
Accident Type Proportion (%)Cost ($)
Fatal Vehicle Accident 0.3 0
Incapacitating Vehicle Accident 17.7 0
Non-incapacitating Vehicle Accident 82 0
Damage Only Vehicle Accident 100 0
Pedestrian Injury Accident 100 0
Economics - Results Data
2040 Delay and Accident Costs
Delay Costs
Peak Delays
Veh.hrs
Costs
($)
Accident Costs
Accident
Types
Annual
Accidents
Accident
Costs
Total Costs
Cost
Type
Costs
($/year)
AM 0.00 0 Vehicles Injury 0.00 0 Vehicle Delay Cost 3818
OFF 0.00 0 Vehicles DO 0.00 0 Vehicle Injury Acc Cost 0
PM 254.52 3818 Pedestrians 0.00 0 Vehicle DO Acc Cost 0
Pedestrian Accident Cost 0
Total Accident Cost 0
Total 254.52 3818 Totals 0.00 0 TOTAL COST 3818
344
Page 8 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Global Results
Performance and Accidents
2040 PM Peak Global Performance
Parameter Units Entries Bypasses Total
Arrive Flows veh/hr 690 690
Capacity veh/hr 4047 4047
Average Delay sec/veh 4.09 4.09
L.O.S. (Signal)A – F A A
L.O.S. (Unsig)A – F A A
Total Delay veh.hrs 0.78 0.78
345
Page 1 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Scheme Summary
Control Data
Control Data and Model Parameters
Galpin Blvd and Brinker St 2040 PHF Flow Profile (veh)
2040 AM peak 7.5 min Time Slice
Rodel-Win1 Queuing Delays (sec)
Right Hand Drive Daylight conditions
AM Peak Hour Peak 60/15 min Results
Full Geometry Output flows: Vehicles
English Units (ft)50% Confidence Level
Available Data
Entry Capacity Calibrated No
Entry Capacity Modified No
Crosswalks No
Flows Factored No
Approach/Exit Road Capacity Calibrated No
Accidents No
Accident Costs No
Bypass Model No
Bypass Calibration No
Global Results Yes
346
Page 2 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Data
Main Geometry (ft)
Approach and Entry Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Approach
Bearing
(deg)
Grade
Separation
G
Half Width
V
Approach
Lanes
n
Entry
Width
E
Entry
Lanes
n
Flare
Length
L'
Entry
Radius
R
Entry
Angle
?
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 33.00 66.00 30.00
2 Galpin Blvd NB 180 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 33.00 66.00 30.00
3 Brinker St WB 270 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 33.00 66.00 30.00
Circulating and Exit Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Inscribed
Diameter
D
Circulating
Width
C
Circulating
Lanes
nc
Exit
Width
Ex
Exit
Lanes
nex
Exit
Half Width
Vx
Exit Half
Width Lanes
nvx
1 Galpin Blvd SB 131.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
2 Galpin Blvd NB 131.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
3 Brinker St WB 131.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
Capacity Modifiers and Capacity Calibration (veh/hr)
Leg Leg Names
Entry Capacity
Capacity
+ or -
XWalk
Factor
Entry Calibration
Intercept
+ or -
Slope
Factor
Approach Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
Exit Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 1.000 0 1.000 12.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
2 Galpin Blvd NB 0 1.000 0 1.000 12.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
3 Brinker St WB 0 1.000 0 1.000 12.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
347
Page 3 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Traffic Flow Data (veh/hr)
2040 AM Peak Peak Hour Flows
Leg Leg Names
Turning Flows
U-Turn Exit-2 Exit-1 Bypass
Flow Modifiers
Trucks
%
Flow
Factor
Peak Hour
Factor
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 0 445 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
2 Galpin Blvd NB 0 190 5 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
3 Brinker St WB 0 20 10 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
348
Page 4 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Results
2040 AM Peak - 60 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 445 20 200 1080 0.4188
2 Galpin Blvd NB None 195 0 465 1091 0.1812
3 Brinker St WB None 30 190 5 992 0.0307
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 5.16 5.16 2.02 A A
2 Galpin Blvd NB None 3.75 3.75 0.62 A A
3 Brinker St WB None 3.52 3.52 0.09 A A
349
Page 5 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
2040 AM Peak - 15 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 500 22 225 1079 0.4685
2 Galpin Blvd NB None 219 0 522 1091 0.2025
3 Brinker St WB None 34 213 6 980 0.0346
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 5.27 5.27 2.02 A A
2 Galpin Blvd NB None 3.69 3.69 0.62 A A
3 Brinker St WB None 3.45 3.45 0.09 A A
350
Page 6 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Approach Flow Profile
2040 AM Peak - Approach Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB Galpin Blvd NB Brinker St WB
0.0 - 7.5 53.33 23.37 3.60
7.5 - 15.0 53.33 23.37 3.60
15.0 - 22.5 53.33 23.37 3.60
22.5 - 30.0 62.50 27.39 4.21
30.0 - 37.5 62.50 27.39 4.21
37.5 - 45.0 53.33 23.37 3.60
45.0 - 52.5 53.33 23.37 3.60
52.5 - 60.0 53.33 23.37 3.60
Peak 15 min 62.50 27.39 4.21
Peak 60 min 55.62 24.38 3.75
Exit Flow Profile
2040 AM Peak - Exit Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB Galpin Blvd NB Brinker St WB
0.0 - 7.5 23.95 55.67 0.60
7.5 - 15.0 23.97 55.73 0.60
15.0 - 22.5 23.97 55.73 0.60
22.5 - 30.0 28.07 65.22 0.70
30.0 - 37.5 28.09 65.31 0.70
37.5 - 45.0 23.99 55.82 0.60
45.0 - 52.5 23.97 55.73 0.60
52.5 - 60.0 23.97 55.73 0.60
0-60 200 465 5
%Trucks 5.00 5.00 5.00
351
Page 7 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Economics
Economic Input Data
2040 - Vehicle Delay Parameters
Peaks Peak / Day Days / Year Delay Cost
($ / hour)
AM Peak 1 325 15.00
OFF Peak 14 325 15.00
PM Peak 1 325 15.00
2040 - Accident Severity Proportions and Costs
Accident Type Proportion (%)Cost ($)
Fatal Vehicle Accident 0.3 0
Incapacitating Vehicle Accident 17.7 0
Non-incapacitating Vehicle Accident 82 0
Damage Only Vehicle Accident 100 0
Pedestrian Injury Accident 100 0
Economics - Results Data
2040 Delay and Accident Costs
Delay Costs
Peak Delays
Veh.hrs
Costs
($)
Accident Costs
Accident
Types
Annual
Accidents
Accident
Costs
Total Costs
Cost
Type
Costs
($/year)
AM 282.76 4241 Vehicles Injury 0.00 0 Vehicle Delay Cost 4241
OFF 0.00 0 Vehicles DO 0.00 0 Vehicle Injury Acc Cost 0
PM 0.00 0 Pedestrians 0.00 0 Vehicle DO Acc Cost 0
Pedestrian Accident Cost 0
Total Accident Cost 0
Total 282.76 4241 Totals 0.00 0 TOTAL COST 4241
352
Page 8 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM peak
Run number 7
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Global Results
Performance and Accidents
2040 AM Peak Global Performance
Parameter Units Entries Bypasses Total
Arrive Flows veh/hr 670 670
Capacity veh/hr 3163 3163
Average Delay sec/veh 4.67 4.67
L.O.S. (Signal)A – F A A
L.O.S. (Unsig)A – F A A
Total Delay veh.hrs 0.87 0.87
353
Page 1 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM peak
Run number 9
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Scheme Summary
Control Data
Control Data and Model Parameters
Galpin Blvd and Brinker St 2040 PHF Flow Profile (veh)
2040 PM peak 7.5 min Time Slice
Rodel-Win1 Queuing Delays (sec)
Right Hand Drive Daylight conditions
PM Peak Hour Peak 60/15 min Results
Full Geometry Output flows: Vehicles
English Units (ft)50% Confidence Level
Available Data
Entry Capacity Calibrated No
Entry Capacity Modified No
Crosswalks No
Flows Factored No
Approach/Exit Road Capacity Calibrated No
Accidents No
Accident Costs No
Bypass Model No
Bypass Calibration No
Global Results Yes
354
Page 2 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM peak
Run number 9
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Data
Main Geometry (ft)
Approach and Entry Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Approach
Bearing
(deg)
Grade
Separation
G
Half Width
V
Approach
Lanes
n
Entry
Width
E
Entry
Lanes
n
Flare
Length
L'
Entry
Radius
R
Entry
Angle
?
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 33.00 66.00 30.00
2 Galpin Blvd NB 180 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 33.00 66.00 30.00
3 Brinker St WB 270 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 33.00 66.00 30.00
Circulating and Exit Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Inscribed
Diameter
D
Circulating
Width
C
Circulating
Lanes
nc
Exit
Width
Ex
Exit
Lanes
nex
Exit
Half Width
Vx
Exit Half
Width Lanes
nvx
1 Galpin Blvd SB 131.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
2 Galpin Blvd NB 131.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
3 Brinker St WB 131.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
Capacity Modifiers and Capacity Calibration (veh/hr)
Leg Leg Names
Entry Capacity
Capacity
+ or -
XWalk
Factor
Entry Calibration
Intercept
+ or -
Slope
Factor
Approach Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
Exit Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 1.000 0 1.000 12.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
2 Galpin Blvd NB 0 1.000 0 1.000 12.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
3 Brinker St WB 0 1.000 0 1.000 12.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
355
Page 3 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM peak
Run number 9
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Traffic Flow Data (veh/hr)
2040 PM Peak Peak Hour Flows
Leg Leg Names
Turning Flows
U-Turn Exit-2 Exit-1 Bypass
Flow Modifiers
Trucks
%
Flow
Factor
Peak Hour
Factor
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 5 285 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
2 Galpin Blvd NB 0 415 15 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
3 Brinker St WB 0 5 5 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
356
Page 4 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM peak
Run number 9
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Results
2040 PM Peak - 60 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 290 5 420 1088 0.2693
2 Galpin Blvd NB None 430 5 290 1088 0.4000
3 Brinker St WB None 10 415 20 876 0.0115
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 4.19 4.19 0.95 A A
2 Galpin Blvd NB None 5.01 5.01 1.69 A A
3 Brinker St WB None 3.71 3.71 0.03 A A
357
Page 5 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM peak
Run number 9
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
2040 PM Peak - 15 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 305 5 442 1088 0.2832
2 Galpin Blvd NB None 453 5 305 1088 0.4206
3 Brinker St WB None 11 437 21 865 0.0123
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 4.17 4.17 0.95 A A
2 Galpin Blvd NB None 5.02 5.02 1.69 A A
3 Brinker St WB None 3.90 3.90 0.03 A A
358
Page 6 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM peak
Run number 9
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Approach Flow Profile
2040 PM Peak - Approach Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB Galpin Blvd NB Brinker St WB
0.0 - 7.5 35.61 52.81 1.23
7.5 - 15.0 35.61 52.81 1.23
15.0 - 22.5 35.61 52.81 1.23
22.5 - 30.0 38.16 56.58 1.32
30.0 - 37.5 38.16 56.58 1.32
37.5 - 45.0 35.61 52.81 1.23
45.0 - 52.5 35.61 52.81 1.23
52.5 - 60.0 35.61 52.81 1.23
Peak 15 min 38.16 56.58 1.32
Peak 60 min 36.25 53.75 1.25
Exit Flow Profile
2040 PM Peak - Exit Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB Galpin Blvd NB Brinker St WB
0.0 - 7.5 51.55 35.60 2.45
7.5 - 15.0 51.58 35.61 2.46
15.0 - 22.5 51.58 35.61 2.46
22.5 - 30.0 55.23 38.14 2.63
30.0 - 37.5 55.26 38.16 2.63
37.5 - 45.0 51.61 35.63 2.46
45.0 - 52.5 51.58 35.61 2.46
52.5 - 60.0 51.58 35.61 2.46
0-60 420 290 20
%Trucks 5.00 5.00 5.00
359
Page 7 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM peak
Run number 9
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Economics
Economic Input Data
2040 - Vehicle Delay Parameters
Peaks Peak / Day Days / Year Delay Cost
($ / hour)
AM Peak 1 325 15.00
OFF Peak 14 325 15.00
PM Peak 1 325 15.00
2040 - Accident Severity Proportions and Costs
Accident Type Proportion (%)Cost ($)
Fatal Vehicle Accident 0.3 0
Incapacitating Vehicle Accident 17.7 0
Non-incapacitating Vehicle Accident 82 0
Damage Only Vehicle Accident 100 0
Pedestrian Injury Accident 100 0
Economics - Results Data
2040 Delay and Accident Costs
Delay Costs
Peak Delays
Veh.hrs
Costs
($)
Accident Costs
Accident
Types
Annual
Accidents
Accident
Costs
Total Costs
Cost
Type
Costs
($/year)
AM 0.00 0 Vehicles Injury 0.00 0 Vehicle Delay Cost 4611
OFF 0.00 0 Vehicles DO 0.00 0 Vehicle Injury Acc Cost 0
PM 307.39 4611 Pedestrians 0.00 0 Vehicle DO Acc Cost 0
Pedestrian Accident Cost 0
Total Accident Cost 0
Total 307.39 4611 Totals 0.00 0 TOTAL COST 4611
360
Page 8 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM peak
Run number 9
Project: Galpin Blvd and Brinker St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Global Results
Performance and Accidents
2040 PM Peak Global Performance
Parameter Units Entries Bypasses Total
Arrive Flows veh/hr 730 730
Capacity veh/hr 3052 3052
Average Delay sec/veh 4.66 4.66
L.O.S. (Signal)A – F A A
L.O.S. (Unsig)A – F A A
Total Delay veh.hrs 0.95 0.95
361
Page 1 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak single-lane option
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Scheme Summary
Control Data
Control Data and Model Parameters
Galpin Blvd and W 78th St 2040 PHF Flow Profile (veh)
2040 AM Peak single-lane option 7.5 min Time Slice
Rodel-Win1 Queuing Delays (sec)
Right Hand Drive Daylight conditions
AM Peak Hour Peak 60/15 min Results
Full Geometry Output flows: Vehicles
English Units (ft)50% Confidence Level
Available Data
Entry Capacity Calibrated No
Entry Capacity Modified No
Crosswalks No
Flows Factored No
Approach/Exit Road Capacity Calibrated No
Accidents No
Accident Costs No
Bypass Model No
Bypass Calibration No
Global Results Yes
362
Page 2 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak single-lane option
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Data
Main Geometry (ft)
Approach and Entry Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Approach
Bearing
(deg)
Grade
Separation
G
Half Width
V
Approach
Lanes
n
Entry
Width
E
Entry
Lanes
n
Flare
Length
L'
Entry
Radius
R
Entry
Angle
?
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
2 78th St EB 90 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
3 Galpin Blvd NB 180 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
4 78th St WB 270 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
Circulating and Exit Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Inscribed
Diameter
D
Circulating
Width
C
Circulating
Lanes
nc
Exit
Width
Ex
Exit
Lanes
nex
Exit
Half Width
Vx
Exit Half
Width Lanes
nvx
1 Galpin Blvd SB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
2 78th St EB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
3 Galpin Blvd NB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
4 78th St WB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
Capacity Modifiers and Capacity Calibration (veh/hr)
Leg Leg Names
Entry Capacity
Capacity
+ or -
XWalk
Factor
Entry Calibration
Intercept
+ or -
Slope
Factor
Approach Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
Exit Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
2 78th St EB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
3 Galpin Blvd NB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
4 78th St WB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
363
Page 3 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak single-lane option
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Traffic Flow Data (veh/hr)
2040 AM Peak Peak Hour Flows
Leg Leg Names
Turning Flows
U-Turn Exit-3 Exit-2 Exit-1 Bypass
Flow Modifiers
Trucks
%
Flow
Factor
Peak Hour
Factor
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 45 450 20 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
2 78th St EB 0 20 65 45 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
3 Galpin Blvd NB 0 75 190 15 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
4 78th St WB 0 30 40 15 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
364
Page 4 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak single-lane option
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Results
2040 AM Peak - 60 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 515 145 225 1026 0.5117
2 78th St EB None 130 525 135 840 0.1578
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 280 130 525 1034 0.2750
4 78th St WB None 85 285 125 958 0.0901
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 6.33 6.33 2.97 A A
2 78th St EB None 4.74 4.74 0.54 A A
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 4.42 4.42 1.07 A A
4 78th St WB None 3.87 3.87 0.28 A A
365
Page 5 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak single-lane option
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
2040 AM Peak - 15 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 579 163 253 1018 0.5764
2 78th St EB None 146 589 152 808 0.1826
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 315 146 589 1026 0.3095
4 78th St WB None 96 320 140 940 0.1024
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 6.66 6.66 2.97 A A
2 78th St EB None 4.80 4.80 0.54 A A
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 4.43 4.43 1.07 A A
4 78th St WB None 3.83 3.83 0.28 A A
366
Page 6 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak single-lane option
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Approach Flow Profile
2040 AM Peak - Approach Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB 78th St EB Galpin Blvd NB 78th St WB
0.0 - 7.5 61.72 15.58 33.56 10.19
7.5 - 15.0 61.72 15.58 33.56 10.19
15.0 - 22.5 61.72 15.58 33.56 10.19
22.5 - 30.0 72.33 18.26 39.33 11.94
30.0 - 37.5 72.33 18.26 39.33 11.94
37.5 - 45.0 61.72 15.58 33.56 10.19
45.0 - 52.5 61.72 15.58 33.56 10.19
52.5 - 60.0 61.72 15.58 33.56 10.19
Peak 15 min 72.33 18.26 39.33 11.94
Peak 60 min 64.38 16.25 35.00 10.63
Exit Flow Profile
2040 AM Peak - Exit Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB 78th St EB Galpin Blvd NB 78th St WB
0.0 - 7.5 26.94 16.16 62.83 14.96
7.5 - 15.0 26.97 16.18 62.92 14.98
15.0 - 22.5 26.97 16.18 62.92 14.98
22.5 - 30.0 31.57 18.94 73.59 17.53
30.0 - 37.5 31.60 18.96 73.73 17.55
37.5 - 45.0 27.00 16.20 63.06 15.01
45.0 - 52.5 26.97 16.18 62.93 14.98
52.5 - 60.0 26.97 16.18 62.92 14.98
0-60 225 135 525 125
%Trucks 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
367
Page 7 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak single-lane option
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Economics
Economic Input Data
2040 - Vehicle Delay Parameters
Peaks Peak / Day Days / Year Delay Cost
($ / hour)
AM Peak 1 325 15.00
OFF Peak 14 325 15.00
PM Peak 1 325 15.00
2040 - Accident Severity Proportions and Costs
Accident Type Proportion (%)Cost ($)
Fatal Vehicle Accident 0.3 0
Incapacitating Vehicle Accident 17.7 0
Non-incapacitating Vehicle Accident 82 0
Damage Only Vehicle Accident 100 0
Pedestrian Injury Accident 100 0
Economics - Results Data
2040 Delay and Accident Costs
Delay Costs
Peak Delays
Veh.hrs
Costs
($)
Accident Costs
Accident
Types
Annual
Accidents
Accident
Costs
Total Costs
Cost
Type
Costs
($/year)
AM 491.04 7366 Vehicles Injury 0.00 0 Vehicle Delay Cost 7366
OFF 0.00 0 Vehicles DO 0.00 0 Vehicle Injury Acc Cost 0
PM 0.00 0 Pedestrians 0.00 0 Vehicle DO Acc Cost 0
Pedestrian Accident Cost 0
Total Accident Cost 0
Total 491.04 7366 Totals 0.00 0 TOTAL COST 7366
368
Page 8 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 AM Peak single-lane option
Run number 11
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 AM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Global Results
Performance and Accidents
2040 AM Peak Global Performance
Parameter Units Entries Bypasses Total
Arrive Flows veh/hr 1010 1010
Capacity veh/hr 3858 3858
Average Delay sec/veh 5.39 5.39
L.O.S. (Signal)A – F A A
L.O.S. (Unsig)A – F A A
Total Delay veh.hrs 1.51 1.51
369
Page 1 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak single lane option
Run number 15
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Scheme Summary
Control Data
Control Data and Model Parameters
Galpin Blvd and W 78th St 2040 PHF Flow Profile (veh)
2040 PM Peak single lane option 7.5 min Time Slice
Rodel-Win1 Queuing Delays (sec)
Right Hand Drive Daylight conditions
PM Peak Hour Peak 60/15 min Results
Full Geometry Output flows: Vehicles
English Units (ft)50% Confidence Level
Available Data
Entry Capacity Calibrated No
Entry Capacity Modified No
Crosswalks No
Flows Factored No
Approach/Exit Road Capacity Calibrated No
Accidents No
Accident Costs No
Bypass Model No
Bypass Calibration No
Global Results Yes
370
Page 2 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak single lane option
Run number 15
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Data
Main Geometry (ft)
Approach and Entry Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Approach
Bearing
(deg)
Grade
Separation
G
Half Width
V
Approach
Lanes
n
Entry
Width
E
Entry
Lanes
n
Flare
Length
L'
Entry
Radius
R
Entry
Angle
?
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
2 78th St EB 90 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
3 Galpin Blvd NB 180 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
4 78th St WB 270 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 164.00 66.00 30.00
Circulating and Exit Geometry
Leg Leg Names
Inscribed
Diameter
D
Circulating
Width
C
Circulating
Lanes
nc
Exit
Width
Ex
Exit
Lanes
nex
Exit
Half Width
Vx
Exit Half
Width Lanes
nvx
1 Galpin Blvd SB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
2 78th St EB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
3 Galpin Blvd NB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
4 78th St WB 164.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1
Capacity Modifiers and Capacity Calibration (veh/hr)
Leg Leg Names
Entry Capacity
Capacity
+ or -
XWalk
Factor
Entry Calibration
Intercept
+ or -
Slope
Factor
Approach Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
Exit Road
V
(ft)
Default
Capacity
Calib
Capacity
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
2 78th St EB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
3 Galpin Blvd NB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
4 78th St WB 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0
371
Page 3 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak single lane option
Run number 15
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Traffic Flow Data (veh/hr)
2040 PM Peak Peak Hour Flows
Leg Leg Names
Turning Flows
U-Turn Exit-3 Exit-2 Exit-1 Bypass
Flow Modifiers
Trucks
%
Flow
Factor
Peak Hour
Factor
1 Galpin Blvd SB 0 40 240 15 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
2 78th St EB 0 30 50 30 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
3 Galpin Blvd NB 0 115 415 25 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
4 78th St WB 0 45 50 30 0 5.0 1.00 0.9
372
Page 4 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak single lane option
Run number 15
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Operational Results
2040 PM Peak - 60 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 295 210 475 994 0.3001
2 78th St EB None 110 325 180 938 0.1185
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 555 120 315 1039 0.5427
4 78th St WB None 125 560 115 823 0.1538
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 4.76 4.76 1.11 A A
2 78th St EB None 4.09 4.09 0.35 A A
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 6.64 6.64 2.92 A A
4 78th St WB None 4.83 4.83 0.48 A A
373
Page 5 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak single lane option
Run number 15
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
2040 PM Peak - 15 minutes
Flows and Capacity
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Flows (veh/hr)
Arrival Flow
Entry Bypass
Opposing Flow
Entry Bypass
Exit
Flow
Capacity (veh/hr)
Capacity
Entry Bypass
Average VCR
Entry Bypass
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 311 221 500 989 0.3172
2 78th St EB None 116 342 189 930 0.1257
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 584 126 331 1036 0.5723
4 78th St WB None 132 589 121 808 0.1645
Delays, Queues and Level of Service
Leg Leg Names Bypass
Type
Average Delay (sec)
Entry Bypass Leg
95% Queue (veh)
Entry Bypass
Level of Service
Entry Bypass Leg
1 Galpin Blvd SB None 4.77 4.77 1.11 A A
2 78th St EB None 4.07 4.07 0.35 A A
3 Galpin Blvd NB None 6.76 6.76 2.92 A A
4 78th St WB None 4.85 4.85 0.48 A A
374
Page 6 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak single lane option
Run number 15
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Approach Flow Profile
2040 PM Peak - Approach Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB 78th St EB Galpin Blvd NB 78th St WB
0.0 - 7.5 36.23 13.51 68.16 15.35
7.5 - 15.0 36.23 13.51 68.16 15.35
15.0 - 22.5 36.23 13.51 68.16 15.35
22.5 - 30.0 38.82 14.47 73.03 16.45
30.0 - 37.5 38.82 14.47 73.03 16.45
37.5 - 45.0 36.23 13.51 68.16 15.35
45.0 - 52.5 36.23 13.51 68.16 15.35
52.5 - 60.0 36.23 13.51 68.16 15.35
Peak 15 min 38.82 14.47 73.03 16.45
Peak 60 min 36.88 13.75 69.38 15.62
Exit Flow Profile
2040 PM Peak - Exit Flows (Veh / Hour)
Time Slice Galpin Blvd SB 78th St EB Galpin Blvd NB 78th St WB
0.0 - 7.5 58.29 22.09 38.67 14.12
7.5 - 15.0 58.33 22.10 38.68 14.12
15.0 - 22.5 58.33 22.11 38.68 14.12
22.5 - 30.0 62.44 23.67 41.43 15.12
30.0 - 37.5 62.49 23.68 41.45 15.13
37.5 - 45.0 58.38 22.12 38.70 14.13
45.0 - 52.5 58.34 22.11 38.69 14.12
52.5 - 60.0 58.33 22.11 38.68 14.12
0-60 475 180 315 115
%Trucks 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
375
Page 7 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak single lane option
Run number 15
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Economics
Economic Input Data
2040 - Vehicle Delay Parameters
Peaks Peak / Day Days / Year Delay Cost
($ / hour)
AM Peak 1 325 15.00
OFF Peak 14 325 15.00
PM Peak 1 325 15.00
2040 - Accident Severity Proportions and Costs
Accident Type Proportion (%)Cost ($)
Fatal Vehicle Accident 0.3 0
Incapacitating Vehicle Accident 17.7 0
Non-incapacitating Vehicle Accident 82 0
Damage Only Vehicle Accident 100 0
Pedestrian Injury Accident 100 0
Economics - Results Data
2040 Delay and Accident Costs
Delay Costs
Peak Delays
Veh.hrs
Costs
($)
Accident Costs
Accident
Types
Annual
Accidents
Accident
Costs
Total Costs
Cost
Type
Costs
($/year)
AM 0.00 0 Vehicles Injury 0.00 0 Vehicle Delay Cost 8316
OFF 0.00 0 Vehicles DO 0.00 0 Vehicle Injury Acc Cost 0
PM 554.43 8316 Pedestrians 0.00 0 Vehicle DO Acc Cost 0
Pedestrian Accident Cost 0
Total Accident Cost 0
Total 554.43 8316 Totals 0.00 0 TOTAL COST 8316
376
Page 8 of 8
Rodel-Win
Report dated 31-Jan-2018
Rodel Version 1.88
Scheme: 2040 PM Peak single lane option
Run number 15
Project: Galpin Blvd and W 78th St2040 PM Peak
50% Confidence Level
Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry
Global Results
Performance and Accidents
2040 PM Peak Global Performance
Parameter Units Entries Bypasses Total
Arrive Flows veh/hr 1085 1085
Capacity veh/hr 3794 3794
Average Delay sec/veh 5.66 5.66
L.O.S. (Signal)A – F A A
L.O.S. (Unsig)A – F A A
Total Delay veh.hrs 1.71 1.71
377
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
APPENDIX D – P OTENTIAL UNDERPASS P LAN
378
HUNTER DR
L
O
N
G
A
R
E
S
D
R
NORTHCARVER
COUNTY
379
CARVER
COUNTY
380
CARVER
COUNTY
381
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
APPENDIX E – GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
382
383
384
Table of Contents
Description Page
A. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
A.1. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1
A.2. Site Conditions and History ................................................................................................. 1
A.3. Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 2
A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents .......................................................... 2
A.5. Scope of Services ................................................................................................................. 2
B. Results .............................................................................................................................................. 3
B.1. Geologic Overview .............................................................................................................. 3
B.2. Boring Results ...................................................................................................................... 3
B.3. Groundwater ....................................................................................................................... 4
B.4. Laboratory Test Results ....................................................................................................... 5
B.4.a. Moisture Contents ................................................................................................. 5
B.4.b. Organic Contents .................................................................................................... 5
B.4.c. Percent Passing the #200 Sieve Tests .................................................................... 5
C. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 5
C.1. Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 5
C.1.a. Pavement Subgrade Preparation and Soil Corrections .......................................... 5
C.1.b. Reuse of Pavement Materials ................................................................................ 6
C.1.c. Reuse of On-Site Soils ............................................................................................. 6
C.1.d. Disturbance of On-Site Soils ................................................................................... 6
C.1.e. Precautions Regarding Changed Information ........................................................ 6
C.2. Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation .............................................................................. 7
C.2.a. Pavement and Trail Subgrade Preparation and Excavations ................................. 7
C.2.b. Groundwater Control ............................................................................................. 8
C.2.c. Excavation Side Slopes ........................................................................................... 8
C.2.d. Subgrade Fill and Compaction ................................................................................ 8
C.2.e. Proofroll .................................................................................................................. 9
C.2.f. Embankment Side Slopes ....................................................................................... 9
C.2.g. Embankment Settlement and Performance .......................................................... 9
C.3. Pavement Design ............................................................................................................... 10
C.3.a. Subgrade R-Value ................................................................................................. 10
C.3.b. Recommended Pavement Sections ...................................................................... 10
C.3.c. Bituminous Pavement Materials and Compaction .............................................. 11
D. Procedures...................................................................................................................................... 11
D.1. Penetration Test Borings ................................................................................................... 11
D.2. Exploration Logs ................................................................................................................ 11
D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets ............................................................................................. 11
D.2.b. Geologic Origins ................................................................................................... 12
D.3. Material Classification and Testing ................................................................................... 12
D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification .......................................................................... 12
D.3.b. Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................... 12
D.4. Groundwater Measurements ............................................................................................ 12
E. Qualifications .................................................................................................................................. 13
E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions .................................................................................. 13
E.1.a. Material Strata ..................................................................................................... 13
385
Table of Contents (continued)
Description Page
E.1.b. Groundwater Levels ............................................................................................. 13
E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility .......................................................................... 13
E.2.a. Plan Review .......................................................................................................... 13
E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ............................................................... 14
E.3. Use of Report..................................................................................................................... 14
E.4. Standard of Care ................................................................................................................ 14
Appendix
Soil Boring Location Sketch
Log of Boring Sheets ST-1 through ST-7
Descriptive Terminology of Soil
Traffic/ESAL Calculations
MnPAVE-Flexible Design Output (Two Sheets)
386
A. Introduction
A.1. Project Description
Per our conversations with Kimley-Horn and Associates (KHA), this project will include reconstructing
approximately 2 miles of Galpin Boulevard, from Trunk Highway (TH) 5 to the Hennepin County Line. We
assume the reconstructed roadway will generally remain within the existing core with grade changes of
less than 2 feet above or 5 feet below the existing roadway profile. We understand new trails will be
constructed outside of the existing footprint parallel to the roadway requiring up to 10 feet of additional
fill along the roadway alignment. In addition, curb and gutter and utilities (storm sewer) will be included
as part of the proposed reconstruction project.
Additional design details associated with the project are provided in Table 1 below. Bituminous
equivalent single axle loads (BESALs) were calculated using the provided traffic counts and the Minnesota
Department of Transportation’s (MnDOT) “State Aid 10 Ton ESAL Traffic Forecast Calculator”
(04/07/2017), with an urban vehicle class distribution. The BESAL calculations are attached in the
Appendix.
Table 1. Design Details for Galpin Boulevard
Roadway Segment
2018 Current
AADT*
2040 Projected
AADT* 20-year BESALs
Galpin Boulevard
(CR 117)
TH 5 to the Hennepin
County Line 8,700 10,000 1,179,000
*Average annual daily traffic (AADT) counts provided by KHA.
A.2. Site Conditions and History
Currently, Galpin Boulevard is a two-lane roadway with occasional turn lanes generally running north and
south through a residential area in the city of Chanhassen.
Current grades along the existing roadway core range in elevation from 965 to 1055 feet Above Mean
Sea Level (MSL). Generally, the roadway slopes up from south (TH 5) to north with gradual hills and
valleys; the steepest grade is located around Melody Hill Road where the roadway slopes down to
Mayflower Road.
387
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 2
A.3. Purpose
The purpose of this geotechnical evaluation was to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at
selected exploration locations and provide geotechnical recommendations for the Galpin Boulevard
(CR 117) reconstruction project.
A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents
We reviewed the following information:
Communications with KHA regarding the proposed reconstruction project.
The Geologic Atlas of Carver County available from the Minnesota Geologic Survey.
In addition to the above sources, we used several publicly available sources of information such as
Google Earth.
We have described our understanding of the proposed construction and site to the extent others
reported it to us. Depending on the extent of available information, we may have made assumptions
based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the
project details, the project team should notify us. New or changed information could require additional
evaluation, analyses and/or recommendations.
A.5. Scope of Services
We performed our scope of services for the project in accordance with our Proposal to Mr. Jon Horn with
KHA, dated March 30, 2018, and authorized through an Individual Project Order on April 16, 2018. The
following list describes the geotechnical tasks completed in accordance with our authorized scope of
services.
Reviewing the background information and reference documents previously cited.
Staking and coordinating the clearing of the exploration locations of underground utilities.
KHA selected and we staked the exploration locations in the field. We acquired the surface
elevations and locations with GPS technology using the State of Minnesota’s permanent GPS
base station network. The Soil Boring Location Sketch included in the Appendix shows the
approximate locations of the borings.
388
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 3
Performing seven standard penetration test (SPT) borings, denoted as ST-1 to ST-7, to
nominal depths of 10 to 14 1/2 feet below grade along the roadway.
Performing laboratory testing on select samples to aid in soil classification and engineering
analysis.
Preparing this report containing a boring location sketch, logs of soil borings, a summary of
the soils encountered, results of laboratory tests, and recommendations for subgrade
preparation and design of pavements.
Our scope of services did not include environmental services or testing, and we did not train the
personnel performing this evaluation to provide environmental services or testing. We can provide these
services or testing at your request.
B. Results
B.1. Geologic Overview
We based the geologic origins used in this report on the soil types, in-situ and laboratory testing, and
available common knowledge of the geological history of the site. Because of the complex depositional
history, geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. We did not perform a detailed investigation of the
geologic history for the site.
B.2. Boring Results
Table 2 provides a summary of the soil boring results, in the general order we encountered the strata.
Please refer to the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix for additional details. The Descriptive
Terminology sheet in the Appendix includes definitions of abbreviations used in Table 2.
389
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 4
Table 2. Subsurface Profile Summary*
Strata
Soil Type -
ASTM
Classification
Range of Penetration
Resistances Commentary and Details
Pavement
section** --- ---
Overall thickness ranges from 13 to 18 inches.
Bituminous thickness ranges from 5 1/2 to 10 inches.
Aggregate base thickness ranges from 5 to 10 inches.
“Aggregate base” represents the layer immediately
underlying the bituminous pavement as identified
during drill. The term does not connote a particular
gradation or classification (i.e. Class 5).
Fill SM, SC, CL 6 to 24 BPF
Not encountered at Boring ST-6.
Generally, dark drown and brown to black.
Moisture condition generally moist.
Thicknesses at boring locations varied from 4 to
13 feet below existing grades.
Highly variable, soils intermixed.
Occasional layers of slightly organic soils, likely
representing buried topsoil, encountered at Borings
ST-1, ST-2, ST-3, and ST-5.
Contained variable amounts of gravel.
Glacial
deposits
(till)
SC, CL 4 to 14 BPF
Encountered beneath the fill and/or pavement
materials.
General penetration resistance of 7 to 14 BPF.
Generally brown and gray to gray.
Variable amounts of gravel; may contain cobbles and
boulders.
Moisture condition moist.
*Abbreviations defined in the attached Descriptive Terminology sheet.
** Where discernable, we attempted to measure the in-place thickness of bituminous and apparent aggregate base to the
nearest 1/2 inch. These measurements were taken within the 8-inch diameter borehole. It can be difficult to identify strata
boundaries, particularly between the aggregate base consisting of sand and gravel and the sand subbase or sandy subgrade soils.
For simplicity in this report, we define fill to mean existing, uncontrolled or undocumented fill.
B.3. Groundwater
We did not observe groundwater while advancing our borings. Therefore, it appears that groundwater is
below the depths explored. However, we anticipate groundwater may be encountered at/near the
surface level of the wetlands along Galpin Boulevard (near Borings ST-3, ST-4, and ST-7), which currently
range in elevation from 864 to 870 feet above MSL. Occasional zones of perched groundwater could also
be located above wetland and low-lying areas.
390
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 5
Groundwater may take days or longer to reach equilibrium in the boreholes and we immediately
backfilled the boreholes in accordance with our scope of work. If the project team identifies a need for
more accurate determination of groundwater depth, we can install piezometers. Project planning should
anticipate seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater.
B.4. Laboratory Test Results
B.4.a. Moisture Contents
We performed moisture content (MC) tests (per ASTM D2216) on selected samples to aid in our
classifications and estimations of the materials’ engineering properties. The moisture contents for the
soils overall ranged from 11 to 24 percent. The Log of Boring Sheets attached in the Appendix present the
results of the moisture content tests in the “MC” column.
B.4.b. Organic Contents
We performed organic content (OC) tests (per ASTM D2974) on selected samples to determine the
reusability of the material for pavement design. The organic content of the material tested ranged from
3 to 4 percent, which makes them “slightly organic” according to MnDOT terminology. The Log of Boring
sheets in the Appendix show the results of the organic content tests in the “Tests or Notes” column.
B.4.c. Percent Passing the #200 Sieve Tests
We performed tests to evaluate the percent of particles passing the #200 sieve (P200) (per ASTM D1140)
to estimate the engineering properties of the granular material. The results of these tests indicated the
tested soils had P200s ranging from 38 to 70 percent. The Log of Boring sheets list the results of P200
tests in the “P200” column.
C. Recommendations
C.1. Discussion
C.1.a. Pavement Subgrade Preparation and Soil Corrections
We recommend typical subgrade preparation procedures as outlined in Section C.2 to prepare the new
pavement and trail areas. These procedures primarily involve pavement stripping (removal) and
subcutting to the proposed grades, proofrolling and then moisture conditioning and compaction of loose
or soft areas of exposed subgrade soils.
391
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 6
Based on our review of the Geologic Atlas of Carver County, it appears pockets of organic soils are
present along Galpin Boulevard within the wetland and low-lying areas near Borings ST-3, ST-4, and ST-7.
Based on the soils encountered in our borings, we anticipate excavation depths of up to 5 feet from
existing grades will be required to remove unsuitable soils below the proposed widening and the
associated embankments and oversize areas. Deeper areas of excavation, particularly in the wetland
areas, should also be anticipated. Our exploration outside of the existing roadway/shoulders was limited
due to site vegetation, slopes, and overhead utilities and additional investigations such as hand auger
borings and/or test pits could be performed to help identify the limits of these unsuitable soils prior to
final design.
C.1.b. Reuse of Pavement Materials
Based on the thicknesses encountered in the borings, it appears reclamation (or milling) of the existing
bituminous pavement for reuse as recycled aggregate base or as a component to new pavements is
feasible. We recommend following MnDOT Specification 3135 for reclaimed materials left in place.
Processed millings replaced as MnDOT Class 5 or Class 6 will require quality control practices including
sieve analyses, asphalt contents and other tests to meet the requirements of Specification 3138.
C.1.c. Reuse of On-Site Soils
The non-organic native and fill soils consisting of silty sand, clayey sand and sandy lean clay generally
appear suitable for reuse, although some moisture conditioning and removal of unsuitable materials may
be required. Soils with organic contents of greater than 5 percent by weight should not be reused as
pavement and/or trail subgrade fill anywhere on the project. Organic soils can be stockpiled for use as a
component in topsoil dressing or in other areas where loads will not be supported. Any materials to be
reused as engineered fill should be tested and approved by the engineer prior to reuse.
C.1.d. Disturbance of On-Site Soils
The contractor should note the on-site clayey and silty soils are susceptible to disturbance due to
repeated construction traffic and/or exposure to precipitation. Disturbance of these soils may cause
areas that were previously prepared or suitable for pavement support to become unstable and require
addition moisture conditioning, compaction, and/or subcutting. Care should be taken to avoid disturbing
the on-site soils.
C.1.e. Precautions Regarding Changed Information
We have attempted to describe our understanding of the proposed construction to the extent it was
reported to us by others. Depending on the extent of available information, assumptions may have been
392
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 7
made based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the
project details, we should be notified. New or changed information could require additional evaluation,
analyses and/or recommendations.
C.2. Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation
C.2.a. Pavement and Trail Subgrade Preparation and Excavations
For subgrade preparation within the existing roadway, we recommend removal of the pavement section
and subcutting to the proposed subgrade depth per design specifications. Based on the borings, we
anticipate excavations to generally range from 1 to 1 1/2 feet to remove the existing pavement section
along the alignment. In addition, we recommend removing topsoil and organic soils (> 5 percent organics
by weight) to at least 3 feet below proposed pavement and trail areas to reduce the risk of settlement
and instability and subsequent effects to roadway performance and maintenance. The exposed subgrade
soils should be evaluated in the field by a geotechnical engineer, then scarified and surface compacted
prior to performing the subgrade proofroll described in Section C.2.d.
As discussed above in Section C.1.a, pockets of organic soils may be present along the alignment and will
generally be encountered adjacent to the roadway in the wetland/low-lying swamp areas near Borings
ST-3, ST-4, and ST-7. Outside of the existing roadway, we recommend removing any vegetation, topsoil,
organic soils and unstable soils from below the proposed road/trail alignment, embankment, and
oversize areas until suitable non-organic soils are encountered.
Excavation depths will vary between the borings. Portions of the excavations may also extend deeper
than indicated by the borings. A geotechnical representative should observe the excavations to make the
necessary field judgments regarding the suitability of the exposed soils.
To provide lateral support to replacement backfill, additional required fill and the loads they will support,
we recommend oversizing (widening) the excavations 1 foot horizontally beyond the outer edges of the
toe of the embankment slope for each foot the excavations extend below bottom of existing grade.
We recommend benches be excavated into the soils of existing slopes that are steeper than 5:1
(horizontal:vertical) prior to placement of fill. The “stair step”-shaped benches are recommended to key
the fill into existing slopes, allow fill to be spread and compact on level surfaces and reduce risk of fill
instability. Benches should be cut at vertical intervals of 2 to 3 feet and be at least 3 feet wide.
393
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 8
C.2.b. Groundwater Control
We anticipate groundwater may be encountered at/near the surface level of the wetlands along Galpin
Boulevard (near Borings ST-3, ST-4, and ST-7), which currently range in elevation from 864 to 870 feet
above MSL.
We recommend removing the groundwater from the excavations to facilitate proper fill placement and
backfilling. Sumps and pumps would likely be suitable for short-term groundwater control in shallow
excavations or trenches near or slightly below groundwater levels or within excavations terminating in
clayey soils.
C.2.c. Excavation Side Slopes
The on-site soils mostly appear to consist of soils meeting OSHA Type B and C requirements. In
accordance with OSHA requirements, we recommend excavation side slopes be constructed to lie back at
a horizontal to vertical slope of 1 1/2:1 (H:V) or flatter. However, in organic soils, or where saturated soils
are present (including saturated sand seams), excavation side slopes may need to lie back at slopes of
5:1 (H:V) or flatter to prevent sloughing.
All excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations
and Trenches.” This document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor.
Reference to these OSHA requirements should be included in the project specifications.
C.2.d. Subgrade Fill and Compaction
To limit differential movement of widened portions of the roadway embankment, we recommend that
materials used in these areas closely match the fill and native soils encountered within the existing
roadway core: usually silty sand, clayey sand, and sandy lean clay. This recommendation includes
extending any cohesive pavement subgrade encountered in the existing roadway to the edges of the
widened embankment. We recommend the plasticity index (PI) of any clayey materials used to match
existing subgrade soils not exceed 15.
We recommend spreading engineered fill in loose lifts of approximately 8 to 12 inches thick.
The project documents should not allow the contractor to use frozen material as engineered fill or to
place engineered fill on frozen material. Frost should not penetrate under foundations during
construction.
394
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 9
We recommend performing density tests in engineered fill to evaluate if the contractors are effectively
compacting the soil and meeting project requirements.
The fill materials should be compacted to a minimum 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry
density (ASTM D 698) within 3 feet of pavement subgrade, and compacted to a minimum 95 percent of
its standard Proctor maximum dry density below 3 feet of the pavement subgrade. We recommend any
granular fill material have a moisture content within 3 percentage points of its optimum moisture
content (OMC), and any cohesive fill material have a moisture content no more than 1 percentage point
below, or 3 percentage points above its OMC.
C.2.e. Proofroll
Prior to placing pavement materials, we recommend proofrolling pavement subgrades to determine if
the subgrade materials are loose, soft or weak, and in need of further stabilization, compaction or
subexcavation and recompaction or replacement. Areas that yield or rut more than 1 inch due to wheel
traffic (fully-loaded dump truck with a rear tandem axle) should be corrected. Failed areas should be
compacted, or if too wet, we recommend scarifying the upper 1 foot of the resulting subgrade and dried
to a moisture content not more than 3 percentage points above OMC. The soil should then be
compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698).
If there are areas that still cannot be compacted, we recommend subexcavating the unstable materials to
a minimum depth of 1 foot, replacing them with suitable materials, and compacting them as specified for
the fill. Depending on the depth of subcut and underlying material, suitable subcut backfill material may
consist of MnDOT select granular material, aggregate base or larger crushed aggregate (such as
3-inch minus). We should be consulted regarding subcut depths and backfill material.
C.2.f. Embankment Side Slopes
We recommend designing embankments with a maximum slope gradient of 3:1 (H:V) or flatter, assuming
soil corrections are performed to remove unstable and organic soils as described in Section C.2.a above.
C.2.g. Embankment Settlement and Performance
In areas where embankment widening is required, we anticipate total settlement of the newly
constructed embankments to generally be less than 1 inch provided the embankments consist of soils
meeting the requirements of Section C.1.c. and the subgrade preparation in Section C.2.a is performed.
However, some long-term settlement of the embankment (and fill areas) should be anticipated where
organic or compressible soils are left in place. This settlement may result in an increase in pavement
maintenance or re-leveling of surface grades. We can establish a more precise magnitude and timeframe
for settlement once fill materials and depths are known.
395
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 10
C.3. Pavement Design
C.3.a. Subgrade R-Value
Assuming grading soils will be similar to the existing fill soils and native soils present on site, we
anticipate the subgrade will consist mostly of sandy lean clay with the possibility of silty sand and clayey
sand pockets. Based on the anticipated subgrade soils, we recommend an R-value of 12 for pavement
thickness design.
C.3.b. Recommended Pavement Sections
For the above subgrade and projected traffic, the bituminous pavement section for Galpin Boulevard in
Table 3 is adequate to 90 percentile reliability according to MnPAVE-Flexible design methodology and its
available Monte Carlo simulation.
Table 3. Minimum Pavement Thicknesses without Sand Subbase and Specifications
Alignment Section Specification
Galpin Boulevard
(TH 5 to the Hennepin
County Line)
3 inches bituminous wear
4 inches bituminous non-wear
9 inches aggregate base
MnDOT 2360 (SPWEA340C)
MnDOT 2360 (SPNWB330B)
MnDOT 3138 (Class 5 or Class 6)
Pedestrian trail 3 inches bituminous surface
8 inches aggregate base
MnDOT 2360 (SPWEA230B)
MnDOT 3138 (Class 5 or Class 6)
Table 4 shows an alternative pavement design that includes a select granular subbase for Galpin
Boulevard. In our opinion, the sand subbase will aid in the overall performance, life, and maintenance
costs associated with the pavement over its service life.
Table 4. Minimum Pavement Thicknesses with Granular Subbase and Specifications
Alignment Section Specification
Galpin Boulevard
(TH 5 to the Hennepin
County Line)
3 inches bituminous wear
2 inches bituminous non-wear
7 inches aggregate base
18 inches of Select Granular Material
MnDOT 2360 (SPWEA340C)
MnDOT 2360 (SPNWB330B)
MnDOT 3138 (Class 5 or Class 6)
MnDOT 3149.2.B.2
We based the above pavement designs on a 20-year performance life. This is the amount of time before
we anticipate the pavement will require reconstruction. This performance life assumes routine
396
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 11
maintenance, such as seal coating and crack sealing. The actual pavement life will vary depending on
variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance.
It is common to place the non-wear course of bituminous and then delay placement of wear course. For
this situation, we recommend evaluating if the reduced pavement section will have sufficient structure to
support construction traffic.
Many conditions affect the overall performance of the pavements. Some of these conditions include the
environment, loading conditions and the level of ongoing maintenance. With regard to bituminous
pavements in particular, it is common to have thermal cracking develop within the first few years of
placement, and continue throughout the life of the pavement. We recommend developing a regular
maintenance plan for filling cracks in pavements to lessen the potential impacts for cold weather distress
due to frost heave or warm weather distress due to wetting and softening of the subgrade.
C.3.c. Bituminous Pavement Materials and Compaction
We recommend specifying crushed aggregate base meeting the requirements of MnDOT Specification
3138 for Class 5 or 6. We recommend that the bituminous wear and base courses meet the requirements
of MnDOT Specifications 2360.
D. Procedures
D.1. Penetration Test Borings
We drilled the penetration test borings with a truck-mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow-
stem auger. We performed the borings in general accordance with ASTM D6151 taking penetration test
samples at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals in general accordance to ASTM D1586. The boring logs show the
actual sample intervals and corresponding depths.
D.2. Exploration Logs
D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets
The Appendix includes Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings. The logs identify and
describe the penetrated geologic materials, and present the results of penetration resistance tests
397
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 12
performed. The logs also present the results of laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples
and groundwater measurements.
We inferred strata boundaries from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings.
Because we did not perform continuous sampling, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The
boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may occur as
gradual rather than abrupt transitions.
D.2.b. Geologic Origins
We assigned geologic origins to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report, based
on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual
classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface
exploration, (3) penetration resistance testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and
(5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the
site and surrounding area in the past.
D.3. Material Classification and Testing
D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification
We visually and manually classified the geologic materials encountered based on ASTM D2488. When we
performed laboratory classification tests, we used the results to classify the geologic materials in
accordance with ASTM D2487. The Appendix includes a chart explaining the classification system we
used.
D.3.b. Laboratory Testing
The exploration logs in the Appendix note most of the results of the laboratory tests performed on
geologic material samples. The remaining laboratory test results follow the exploration logs. We
performed the tests in general accordance with ASTM or AASHTO procedures.
D.4. Groundwater Measurements
The drillers checked for groundwater while advancing the penetration test borings, and again after auger
withdrawal. We then filled the boreholes as noted on the boring logs.
398
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 13
E. Qualifications
E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions
E.1.a. Material Strata
We developed our evaluation, analyses and recommendations from a limited amount of site and
subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from
exploration locations continuously with depth. Therefore, we must infer strata boundaries and
thicknesses to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and project planning
should expect the strata to vary in depth, elevation and thickness, away from the exploration locations.
Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until
performing additional exploration work, or starting construction. If future activity for this project reveals
any such variations, you should notify us so that we may reevaluate our recommendations. Such
variations could increase construction costs, and we recommend including a contingency to
accommodate them.
E.1.b. Groundwater Levels
We made groundwater measurements under the conditions reported herein and shown on the
exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. Note that the observation periods were
relatively short, and project planning can expect groundwater levels to fluctuate in response to rainfall,
flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal
and annual factors.
E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility
E.2.a. Plan Review
We based this report on a limited amount of information, and we made a number of assumptions to help
us develop our recommendations. We should review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and
specifications. This review will allow us to evaluate whether we anticipated the design correctly, if any
design changes affect the validity of our recommendations, and if the design and specifications correctly
interpret and implement our recommendations.
399
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B1802734
May 4, 2018
Page 14
E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing
We recommend retaining us to perform the required observations and testing during construction as
part of the ongoing geotechnical evaluation. This will allow us to correlate the subsurface conditions
exposed during construction with those encountered by the borings and provide professional continuity
from the design phase to the construction phase. If we do not perform observations and testing during
construction, it becomes the responsibility of others to validate the assumption made during the
preparation of this report and to accept the construction-related geotechnical engineer-of-record
responsibilities.
E.3. Use of Report
This report is for the exclusive use of the addressed parties. Without written approval, we assume no
responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may
not be appropriate for other parties or projects.
E.4. Standard of Care
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality.
No warranty, express or implied, is made.
400
Appendix
401
MAJESTICWAYH U NTER DRI
V
E
LONGA R E S D R IV E
MATCH LINE
W.78THSTREET WALNUTLANEBRINKER STREET
WYNSONGLANETOPAZDRIVELAKEHARRISONLAKELUCYROADROAD
PINEHURST DRIVE
CRESTVIEW
W.65TH STREET
MELODY HILL ROAD
P
H
E
A
S
A
N
T
D
R
I
V
E
F:\2018\B1802734.dwg,Geotech,4/27/2018 10:55:15 AM
braunintertec.com952.995.2000Minneapolis, MN 5543811001 Hampshire Avenue SProject No:B1802734Drawn By:Date Drawn:Checked By:Last Modified: 4/27/18Drawing No:Project InformationDrawing InformationB1802734JAG3/26/18BJSGalpin Boulevard(CR 117)Galpin Boulevardbetween TH 5 to theHennepin County LineChanhassen, MinnesotaSoil BoringLocation SketchDENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFSTANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING0SCALE:1"= 400'400'200'N402
15
30
8
6
4
Benchmark: Elevationswere obtained usingGPS and the State ofMinnesota's permanentbase station network.
OC=4%
11
14
23
PAV
FILL
FILL
FILL
CL
7 inches of bituminous over 10 inches of aggregate base.
FILL: Silty Sand, fine-grained, trace Gravel, brown,moist.
FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and darkbrown, moist.
FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, slightly organic, dark brown toblack moist.
SANDY LEAN CLAY, with lenses of Silt, gray and brown,moist, soft.(Glacial Till)
END OF BORING.
Water not observed while drilling.
Boring immediately backfilled.
963.0
959.4
955.4
951.4
949.9
1.4
5.0
9.0
13.0
14.5
3/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER:
Tests or NotesWL
ST-1 page 1 of 1
3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain
L O G O F B O R I N G
(See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)LOCATION: N: 182329, E: 548803. See attachedsketch.
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908)
Description of Materials
ST-1
METHOD:
BORING:
BPF
Braun Intertec CorporationB1802734LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\02734.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 4/27/18 11:14Braun Project B1802734
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117)
TH 5 to the Hennepin County Line
Chanhassen, Minnesota
MC
%Symbol
Elev.feet
964.4
Depthfeet
0.0
403
7
7
7
9
OC=3%17
21
PAV
FILL
CL
10 inches of bituminous over 8 inches of aggregate base.
FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, slightly organic, dark brown toblack, moist.
SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown and gray withsome iron stains, moist, medium to stiff.(Glacial Till)
END OF BORING.
Water not observed while drilling.
Boring immediately backfilled.
985.4
982.9
975.9
1.5
4.0
11.0
3/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER:
Tests or NotesWL
ST-2 page 1 of 1
3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain
L O G O F B O R I N G
(See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)LOCATION: N: 183707, E: 549134. See attachedsketch.
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908)
Description of Materials
ST-2
METHOD:
BORING:
BPF
Braun Intertec CorporationB1802734LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\02734.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 4/27/18 11:14Braun Project B1802734
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117)
TH 5 to the Hennepin County Line
Chanhassen, Minnesota
MC
%Symbol
Elev.feet
986.9
Depthfeet
0.0
404
9
12
11
9
4
70
OC=3%
22
18
20
PAV
FILL
FILL
CL
8 inches of inches of bituminous over 6 inches ofaggregate base.
FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown, dark brownand gray, moist.
FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, slightly organic, trace roots, withlenses of Silt and Silty Sand, dark brown to black, moist.
SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, gray, moist, soft(Glacial Till)
END OF BORING.
Water not observed while drilling.
Boring immediately backfilled.
994.1
986.3
981.3980.8
1.2
9.0
14.014.5
3/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER:
Tests or NotesWL
ST-3 page 1 of 1
3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain
L O G O F B O R I N G
(See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)LOCATION: N: 185272, E: 549528. See attachedsketch.
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908)
Description of Materials
ST-3
METHOD:
BORING:
BPF
Braun Intertec CorporationB1802734LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\02734.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 4/27/18 11:14Braun Project B1802734
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117)
TH 5 to the Hennepin County Line
Chanhassen, Minnesota
P200
%
MC
%Symbol
Elev.feet
995.3
Depthfeet
0.0
405
14
16
12
14
12
22
PAV
FILL
SC
CL
8 inches of bituminous over 10 inches of aggregate base.
FILL: Mix of Clayey Sand and Sandy Lean Clay, traceGravel, dark brown and gray, moist.
CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained, trace Gravel, brown andgray, moist, medium dense.(Glacial Till)
SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown and gray,moist, stiff.(Glacial Till)
END OF BORING.
Water not observed while drilling.
Boring immediately backfilled.
975.3
969.8
967.8
965.8
1.5
7.0
9.0
11.0
3/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER:
Tests or NotesWL
ST-4 page 1 of 1
3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain
L O G O F B O R I N G
(See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)LOCATION: N: 186828, E: 550105. See attachedsketch.
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908)
Description of Materials
ST-4
METHOD:
BORING:
BPF
Braun Intertec CorporationB1802734LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\02734.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 4/27/18 11:14Braun Project B1802734
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117)
TH 5 to the Hennepin County Line
Chanhassen, Minnesota
MC
%Symbol
Elev.feet
976.8
Depthfeet
0.0
406
9
12
9
7
7
OC=4%
13
18
24
PAV
FILL
FILL
CL
7 inches of bituminous over 7 inches of aggregate base.
FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, gray and darkbrown, moist.
With a seam of Silty Sand at 5 feet.
FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, slightly organic, trace roots, darkbrown, moist.
SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, gray, moist, medium.(Glacial Till)
END OF BORING.
Water not observed while drilling.
Boring immediately backfilled.
991.8
984.0
981.0
978.5
1.2
9.0
12.0
14.5
3/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER:
Tests or NotesWL
ST-5 page 1 of 1
3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain
L O G O F B O R I N G
(See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)LOCATION: N: 188228, E: 550470. See attachedsketch.
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908)
Description of Materials
ST-5
METHOD:
BORING:
BPF
Braun Intertec CorporationB1802734LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\02734.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 4/27/18 11:14Braun Project B1802734
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117)
TH 5 to the Hennepin County Line
Chanhassen, Minnesota
MC
%Symbol
Elev.feet
993.0
Depthfeet
0.0
407
9
7
11
11
18
16
PAV
CL
5 1/2 inches of bituminous over 9 inches of aggregatebase.
SANDY LEAN CLAY, with lenses of Clayey Sand, brownand gray with iron stains, moist, medium to stiff.(Glacial Till)
END OF BORING.
Water not observed while drilling.
Boring immediately backfilled.
1030.3
1020.5
1.2
11.0
3/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER:
Tests or NotesWL
ST-6 page 1 of 1
3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain
L O G O F B O R I N G
(See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)LOCATION: N: 189427, E: 550515. See attachedsketch.
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908)
Description of Materials
ST-6
METHOD:
BORING:
BPF
Braun Intertec CorporationB1802734LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\02734.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 4/27/18 11:14Braun Project B1802734
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117)
TH 5 to the Hennepin County Line
Chanhassen, Minnesota
MC
%Symbol
Elev.feet
1031.5
Depthfeet
0.0
408
24
8
4
14
3811
21
PAV
FILL
FILL
SC
CL
7 inches of bituminous over 5 inches of aggregate base.
FILL: Clayey Sand, fine-grained, trace Gravel, darkbrown and gray, moist.
FILL: Clayey Sand, fine-grained, with lenses of LeanClay, dark gray, moist.
CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained, with Sand lenses, gray andbrown, moist, very loose.(Glacial Till)
SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown and gray,moist, stiff.(Glacial Till)
END OF BORING.
Water not observed while drilling.
Boring immediately backfilled.
983.1
980.1
977.1
975.1
973.1
1.0
4.0
7.0
9.0
11.0
3/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER:
Tests or NotesWL
ST-7 page 1 of 1
3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain
L O G O F B O R I N G
(See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)LOCATION: N: 191611, E: 550839. See attachedsketch.
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908)
Description of Materials
ST-7
METHOD:
BORING:
BPF
Braun Intertec CorporationB1802734LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\02734.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 4/27/18 11:14Braun Project B1802734
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117)
TH 5 to the Hennepin County Line
Chanhassen, Minnesota
P200
%
MC
%Symbol
Elev.feet
984.1
Depthfeet
0.0
409
Descriptive Terminology of Soil
Based on Standards ASTM D 2487-11/2488-09a
(Unified Soil Classification System)
Group
Symbol Group NameB
Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D GW Well-graded gravelE
Cu < 4 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D GP Poorly graded gravelE
Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelE F G
Fines Classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelE F G
Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D SW Well-graded sandI
Cu < 6 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D SP Poorly graded sandI
Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandF G I
Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandF G I
CL Lean clayK L M
PI < 4 or plots below "A" lineJ ML SiltK L M
Organic OL
CH Fat clayK L M
MH Elastic siltK L M
Organic OH
PT Peat
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and
Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA
Soil Classification
Coarse-grained Soils (more than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve)Fine-grained Soils (50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve) Sands
(50% or more coarse
fraction passes No. 4
sieve)
Clean Gravels
(Less than 5% finesC)
Gravels with Fines
(More than 12% finesC)
Clean Sands
(Less than 5% finesH)
Sands with Fines
(More than 12% finesH)
Gravels
(More than 50% of
coarse fraction
retained on No. 4
sieve)
Highly Organic Soils
Silts and Clays
(Liquid limit less than
50)
Silts and Clays
(Liquid limit 50 or
more)
Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor
Inorganic
Inorganic
PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" lineJ
PI plots on or above "A" line
PI plots below "A" line
Liquid Limit −oven dried
Liquid Limit −not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M N
Organic silt K L M O
Liquid Limit −oven dried
Liquid Limit −not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M P
Organic silt K L M Q
Particle Size Identification
Boulders.............. over 12"
Cobbles................ 3" to 12"
Gravel
Coarse............. 3/4" to 3" (19.00 mm to 75.00 mm)
Fine................. No. 4 to 3/4" (4.75 mm to 19.00 mm)
Sand
Coarse.............. No. 10 to No. 4 (2.00 mm to 4.75 mm)
Medium........... No. 40 to No. 10 (0.425 mm to 2.00 mm)
Fine.................. No. 200 to No. 40 (0.075 mm to 0.425 mm)
Silt........................ No. 200 (0.075 mm) to .005 mm
Clay...................... < .005 mm
Relative ProportionsL, M
trace............................. 0 to 5%
little.............................. 6 to 14%
with.............................. ≥ 15%
Inclusion Thicknesses
lens............................... 0 to 1/8"
seam............................. 1/8" to 1"
layer.............................. over 1"
Apparent Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils
Very loose ..................... 0 to 4 BPF
Loose ............................ 5 to 10 BPF
Medium dense.............. 11 to 30 BPF
Dense............................ 31 to 50 BPF
Very dense.................... over 50 BPF
A.Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve.
B.If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders,
or both" to group name.
C. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:
GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt
GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay
GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt
GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay
D.Cu = D60 / D10 Cc = 𝐷30 2 / (𝐷10 𝑥𝐷60)
E.If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name.
F.If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM or SC-SM.
G. If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name.
H. Sands with 5 to 12%fines require dual symbols:
SW-SM well-graded sand with silt
SW-SC well-graded sand with clay
SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt
SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay
I.If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name.
J. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is CL-ML, silty clay.
K.If soil contains 15 to < 30% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is
predominant.
L. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name.
M. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name.
N. PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above “A” line.
O. PI < 4 or plots below “A” line.
P. PI plots on or above “A” line.
Q.PI plots below “A” line.
Laboratory Tests
DD Dry Density,pcf OC Organic content, %PL Plastic limit
WD Wet Density, pcf qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf LL Liquid limit
P200 % Passing #200 sieve MC Moisture conent, %PI Plasticity Index
Consistency of Blows Approximate Unconfined
Cohesive Soils Per Foot Compressive Strength
Very soft................... 0 to 1 BPF................... < 1/4 tsf
Soft........................... 2 to 4 BPF................... 1/4 to 1/2 tsf
Medium.................... 5 to 8 BPF .................. 1/2 to 1 tsf
Stiff........................... 9 to 15 BPF................. 1 to 2 tsf
Very Stiff................... 16 to 30 BPF............... 2 to 4 tsf
Hard.......................... over 30 BPF................ > 4 tsf
Drilling Notes:
BPF: Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standard
penetration test, also known as “N” value. The sampler was set
6 inches into undisturbed soil below the hollow-stem auger.
Driving resistances were then counted for second and third
6-inch increments, and added to get BPF.
Partial Penetration:If the sampler cannot be driven the full
12 inches beyond the initial 6-inch set, the number of blows for
that partial penetration is shown as "No./X" (i.e., 50/2"). If the
sampler cannot be advanced beyond the initial 6-inch set, the
depth of penetration will be recorded in the Notes column as
"No. to set X" (i.e., 50 to set 4").
WH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of
hammer and rods alone; driving not required.
WR: WR indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of
rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required.
WL: WL indicates the water level measured by the drillers
either while drilling or following drilling.
Moisture Content:
Dry:Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch.
Moist: Damp but no visible water.
Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table.
1/2018 410
Instructions: All yellow boxes require an input value.
Dropdown choices are provided for Base Year (C18), Number of Lanes (C19), and Urban or Rural (C21).
You must click on cells C18, C19, and C21 to access the dropdown choices.
General Information
Date
Forecast Performed by
Name of County or City
Project Number
Project Description
Route Number
Base Year (i.e. opening to traffic)2020
Number of Lanes (total both directions)2 = typical 2 lane
Current AADT 8,700
Urban or Rural Urban
Historical AADT (enter a minimum of two years)Year AADT
Enter oldest traffic data here 2018 8,700
Enter second oldest traffic data here 2040 10,000
Enter third oldest traffic data here
Enter fourth oldest traffic data here
Base Year AADT 2020 8,820
20-Year AADT 2040 10,000
35-Year AADT 2055 10,890
Growth Rate
Vehicle Class
%Flexible Rigid
2AX-6TIRE SU 1.45%0.25 0.24
3AX+SU 0.08%0.58 0.85
3AX TST 0.12%0.39 0.37
4AX TST 0.24%0.51 0.53
5AX+TST 1.75%1.13 1.89
TR TR, BUSES 0.64%0.57 0.74
TWIN TRAILERS 0.00%2.40 2.33
Total 4.27%NA NA
20-Year Flexible Forecast (10 Ton) = 1,179,000
20-Year Rigid Forecast (10 Ton) = 1,764,000
35-Year Flexible Forecast (10 Ton) = 2,116,000
35-Year Rigid Forecast (10 Ton) = 3,167,000
Revised: 11/8/2017
State Aid 10 Ton ESAL Traffic Forecast Calculator
For State Aid questions and information concerning this tool, please contact State Aid Pavement Engineer
Joel Ulring at joel.ulring@state.mn.us or 651-366-3831.
4/3/2018
Brian Schreurs (Braun Intertec)
Carver County - City of Chanhassen
B1802734
Vehicle Type ESAL Factors
0.67%
Galpin Boulevard (CSAH 117) Reconstruction
from W. 78th Street to north of Pheasant Dr.
This ESAL calculator is for use with default Heavy Commerical Traffic values; click "User Defined Traffic
Values" sheet below if you wish to enter your own Heavy Commercial Traffic values.
411
MnPAVE Design Summary
MnPAVE 6.304 Simulation Input File: Galpin Blvd - no sand subbase
Confidence Level for Preliminary Life Estimate = 70%
Confidence and Reliability may not agree. Thickness and modulus are reduced when Confidence > 50%.
Monte Carlo Reliability randomly selects values for each layer. Use Reliability for final design.
Preliminary Life Estimate 20-Year Reliability (2,500 cycles)
Fatigue FatigueRutting Rutting
>50 years 21 years 100%92.6%
Project Information
District County City
Metro Carver Chanhassen
Project Number Route Reference Post
B1802734 Galpin Blvd. (CSAH 117)from -- to --
Letting Date Construction Type
05/04/20 Reconstruction
Designer Soils Engineer
KHA Brian Schreurs Braun Intertec
Climate Information
Seasons Location
5 44˚ 48’ Latitude, 93˚ 46’ Longitude
Structural Information (Design Level: Basic)
Layer Type Subtype Height (in.)
1a Hot-Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%) PG58-34 (2360F 1/2")4.00
1b Hot-Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%) PG58-28 (2360F 1/2")3.00
2 Aggregate Base MnDOT Class 5 9.00
3 Engineered Soil Unified CL 12.00
4 Undisturbed Soil Unified CL
Traffic Information (Speed = 45 mph)
Load Type First Year ESAL Growth Rate Total Repetitions
ESAL 55,420 0.7% (simple)1,179,000
Notes
From West 78th Street to north of Pheasant Drive
The Minnesota Department of Transportation makes no guarantee or warranty, either express or implied, with respect to the reuse of the data provided
herewith, regardless of its format or means of its transmission. The user accepts the data "as is", and assumes all risks associated with its use. By
accepting this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user shall include with
the data a copy of this disclaimer. The Minnesota Department of Transportation assumes no responsibility, actual or consequential, for damage that
results from any user’s reliance on this data.
Printed Friday, April 27, 2018 at 15:30:34
412
MnPAVE Design Summary
MnPAVE 6.304 Simulation Input File: Galpin Blvd - with sand subbase
Confidence Level for Preliminary Life Estimate = 70%
Confidence and Reliability may not agree. Thickness and modulus are reduced when Confidence > 50%.
Monte Carlo Reliability randomly selects values for each layer. Use Reliability for final design.
Preliminary Life Estimate 20-Year Reliability (2,500 cycles)
Fatigue FatigueRutting Rutting
>50 years >50 years 100%99.9%
Project Information
District County City
Metro Carver Chanhassen
Project Number Route Reference Post
B1802734 Galpin Blvd. (CSAH 117)from -- to --
Letting Date Construction Type
05/04/20 Reconstruction
Designer Soils Engineer
KHA Brian Schreurs Braun Intertec
Climate Information
Seasons Location
5 44˚ 48’ Latitude, 93˚ 46’ Longitude
Structural Information (Design Level: Intermediate)
Layer Type Subtype Height (in.)
1 Hot-Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%) PG58-34 (2360F 1/2")5.00
2 Aggregate Base MnDOT Class 5 7.00
3 Aggregate Subbase MnDOT Select Granular 18.00
4 Engineered Soil R-Value = 12 (CL)12.00
5 Undisturbed Soil Engineered Soil Modulus/2
Traffic Information (Speed = 45 mph)
Load Type First Year ESAL Growth Rate Total Repetitions
ESAL 55,420 0.7% (simple)1,179,000
Notes
From West 78th Street to north of Pheasant Drive
The Minnesota Department of Transportation makes no guarantee or warranty, either express or implied, with respect to the reuse of the data provided
herewith, regardless of its format or means of its transmission. The user accepts the data "as is", and assumes all risks associated with its use. By
accepting this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user shall include with
the data a copy of this disclaimer. The Minnesota Department of Transportation assumes no responsibility, actual or consequential, for damage that
results from any user’s reliance on this data.
Printed Friday, April 27, 2018 at 15:28:36
413
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
APPENDIX F – PREFERR ED LAYOUT AND PROFIL E
414
MAJESTIC WAY HUNTER DR LONGACRES DRRDTOPAZ DR HARRISONLAKELAKE LUCY RD
PINEHURST D
R
CRESTVIEW D
R
W 65TH STWHITETAIL RIDGE CTMELODY HILL
R
D
PH
E
A
S
A
N
T
D
RGALPIN BLVD (CR 117) W 78TH ST WALNUT CURVEBRINKER ST
GALPIN BOULEVARD (CR 117)RECONSTRUCTIONPROPOSED ROADWAYPLAN AND PROFILEALTERNATIVE BNORTHCARVERCOUNTY415
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
APPENDIX G – PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN
416
MAJESTIC WAY HUNTER DRLONGACRES DRRDTOPAZ DR HARRISONLAKELAKE LUCY RD
PINEHURST DR
CRESTVIEW DR
W 65TH STWHITETAIL RIDGE CTMELODY HILL RD
P
H
E
A
S
A
N
T
D
R GALPIN BLVD (CR 117) W 78TH STWALNUT CURVEBRINKER ST PROPOSEDPOND AWATER QUALITYVOLUME - 8,800 CF POND AREA - 17,500 SFPROPOSEDPOND BWATER QUALITYVOLUME - 3,100 CFPOND AREA - 12,500 SFPROPOSED POND CWATER QUALITYVOLUME - 3,100 CFPOND AREA - 11,000 SFPROPOSED POND DWATER QUALITYVOLUME - 12,000 CFPOND AREA - 26,000 SFFINE SEDIMENTPRETREATMENTDEVICEMANAGE 2WETLANDCLASSIFICATIONGALPIN BOULEVARD (CR 117)RECONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYSTORM DRAINAGE PLANNORTHCARVERCOUNTY417
Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Improvements
August 2018
APPENDIX H – ESTIMATED COSTS A ND FUNDING
418
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE AND COST PARTICIPATION PLAN
Project:GALPIN BOULEVARD (CR 177) RECONSTRUCTION
Owner:CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND CARVER COUNTY
Description:PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE - LAYOUT ALTERNATIVE B
MAY 31, 2018
Item No.Item Description Unit
Contract
Quantity Unit Price Amount County City Cost Share Notes
1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ 248,500.00$ 101,500.00$ Prorated by construction cost share - 71% County/29% City
2 2101.505 CLEARING/GRUBBING LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ -$ County
3 2101.505 MISCELLANEOUS REMOVALS LUMP SUM 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 45,500.00$ 4,500.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
4 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 1400 3.00$ 4,200.00$ 3,800.00$ 400.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
5 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 8500 3.00$ 25,500.00$ 12,750.00$ 12,750.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
6 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ YD 1750 6.00$ 10,500.00$ 4,200.00$ 6,300.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
7 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 52500 3.00$ 157,500.00$ 139,900.00$ 17,600.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
8 2105.507 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 75000 8.00$ 600,000.00$ 546,000.00$ 54,000.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
9 2105.507 POND EXCAVATION CU YD 35000 8.00$ 280,000.00$ 238,000.00$ 42,000.00$ Contributing flow - 85% County/15% City
10 2105.507 MUCK EXCAVATION CU YD 7500 10.00$ 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ -$ County
11 2105.507 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD 40000 15.00$ 600,000.00$ 546,000.00$ 54,000.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
12 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 CU YD 13000 22.00$ 286,000.00$ 260,300.00$ 25,700.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
13 2360.509 BITUMINOUS TRAIL SQ FT 180000 2.00$ 360,000.00$ -$ 360,000.00$ City
14 2360.509 BITUMINOUS NON WEAR COURSE MIX (ROADWAY)TON 6500 60.00$ 390,000.00$ 355,500.00$ 34,500.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
15 2360.509 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIX (ROADWAY)TON 9800 65.00$ 637,000.00$ 581,750.00$ 55,250.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
16 2503.503 STORM SEWER PIPE (15"-18")LIN FT 7750 40.00$ 310,000.00$ 263,500.00$ 46,500.00$ Contributing flow - 85% County/15% City
17 2503.503 STORM SEWER PIPE (24"-36")LIN FT 5500 60.00$ 330,000.00$ 280,500.00$ 49,500.00$ Contributing flow - 85% County/15% City
18 2503.603 DRAINTILE LIN FT 24500 8.00$ 196,000.00$ 178,400.00$ 17,600.00$ County
19 2503.603 42" CULVERT EXTENSION LIN FT 50 250.00$ 12,500.00$ 12,500.00$ -$ County
20 2506.602 CATCH BASINS EACH 55 2,500.00$ 137,500.00$ 116,900.00$ 20,600.00$ Contributing flow - 85% County/15% City
21 2506.602 MANHOLE/CATCH BASINS EACH 60 4,000.00$ 240,000.00$ 204,000.00$ 36,000.00$ Contributing flow - 85% County/15% City
22 2506.602 POND OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURES EACH 5 10,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 42,500.00$ 7,500.00$ Contributing flow - 85% County/15% City
23 2501.603 FLARED END SECTION WITH TRASH GUARD (24"-36")EACH 5 2,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 8,500.00$ 1,500.00$ Contributing flow - 85% County/15% City
24 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 33000 14.00$ 462,000.00$ 33,600.00$ 428,400.00$ 2,400 LF County/30,600 LF City
25 2531.504 CONCRETE MEDIAN SQ YD 1500 45.00$ 67,500.00$ 45,000.00$ 22,500.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
26 2411.618 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SQ FT 24000 26.00$ 624,000.00$ 312,000.00$ 312,000.00$ 50/50
27 2557.603 48" CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 2700 20.00$ 54,000.00$ 27,000.00$ 27,000.00$ 50/50
28 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT/ROUNDABOUT APRON SQ YD 1000 65.00$ 65,000.00$ 32,500.00$ 32,500.00$ 50/50
29 2360.602 DRIVEWAY REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT EACH 18 3,000.00$ 54,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 9,000.00$ County
30 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 21,300.00$ 8,700.00$ Prorated by construction cost share - 71% County/29% City
31 2573.601 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 53,250.00$ 21,750.00$ Prorated by construction cost share - 71% County/29% City
32 2575.601 TURF ESTABLISHMENT LUMP SUM 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 45,500.00$ 4,500.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
33 2571.501 TREES LUMP SUM 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ -$ 50,000.00$ City
34 2582.601 SIGNING/STRIPING LUMP SUM 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 45,500.00$ 4,500.00$ County except West 78th Street (City)
35 2545.511 STREET LIGHTING (AT ROUNDABOUTS AND INTERSECTIONS) EACH 28 8,000.00$ 224,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 192,000.00$ 4 EACH County/24 EACH City
Subtotal:6,927,200.00$ 4,866,650.00$ 2,060,550.00$
10% Contingency:693,000.00$ 487,000.00$ 206,000.00$
Subtotal with Contingency:7,620,200.00$ 5,353,650.00$ 2,266,550.00$
4% Escalation (2018 to 2022):305,000.00$ 215,000.00$ 90,000.00$
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 7,925,200.00$ 5,568,650.00$ 2,356,550.00$
LUMP SUM 1 400,000.00$ 400,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 50/50
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION AND RIGHT-OF-WAY COST 8,325,200.00$ 5,768,650.00$ 2,556,550.00$
20% INDIRECT COST 1,665,000.00$ 1,154,000.00$ 511,000.00$
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST 9,990,200.00$ 6,922,650.00$ 3,067,550.00$
NOTES:
1. INCLUDES 10% CONTINGENCY AND 4% FOR ESCALATON FOR 2022 CONSTRUCTION PRICING
2. ASSUMES PAVEMENT SECTION OF 5” BITUMINOUS, 7” AGGREGATE BASE, AND 18” SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL (PER BRAUN GEOTECH REPORT)
3. ASSUMES NO WATER MAIN OR SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
4. INCLUDES 7,500 CY OF MUCK EXCAVATION AND SELECT GRANULAR BACKFILL FOR SOIL CORRECTION - SOIL CORRECTION NEEDS TO BE FURTHER DEFINED AS A PART OF FUTURE DESIGN EFFORTS
5. ROW/EASEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS ASSUME THAT EASEMENT AREAS FOR STORM WATER FACILITIES ON CITY PARK LAND AND THE PRINCE PROPERTY WILL BE DEDICATED AND THAT
ACQUISITION COSTS WILL BE INCURRED FOR ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE 2 STORM WATER FACILITIES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
COST PARTICIPATION PLAN
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENT ACQUISITION COSTS
419
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
RESOLUTION NO. _____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL OF TURNBACK ACCEPTANCE
AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF CARVER FOR COUNTY HIGHWAY
NO. 117 WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
WHEREAS,the County Board of the County of Carver intends to adopt a resolution
(copy attached), to revoke the designation and turnback of County Highway No. 117
within the corporate limits of the City of Chanhassen, as follows:
County Highway No. 117, beginning in Section 15, Township 116 North, Range 23
West at the intersection of Trunk Highway 5 (Arboretum Boulevard) and Galpin
Boulevard at a point approximately 700 feet easterly of the northwest corner of said
Section 15; thence continuing northerly along Galpin Boulevard through Sections
10 and 3, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, to the Hennepin County border at
point approximately 200 feet east of the northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter
of said Section 3, and there terminating, is hereby revoked and turned back to said
city for use as a city street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Chanhassen that said revocation and turnback is in all things approved, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chanhassen enter
into Carver County Agreement No. 21-452 with Carver County and that the City Mayor
and City Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the
Agreement.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen this ___ day of _________, 2022
ATTEST:
______________________________
Elise Ryan, Mayor
Laurie Hokannen, City Manager
420
CARVER COUNTY
COUNTY HIGHWAY
JURISDICTIONAL REVERSION
("TURNBACK") AGREEMENT
County Highway Number: 117
Purpose: County release of County Highway No. 117 to the City of Chanhassen lying
northerly of Trunk Highway No. 5 to the Hennepin County border.
This Agreement is between the County of Carver, acting through its County Board of
Commissioners ("County") and the City of Chanhassen, a political subdivision of the State of
Minnesota acting through its City Council ("Political Subdivision").
RECITALS
1. Minnesota Statutes §375 authorizes Minnesota counties to enter into agreements with other
governmental authorities; and
2. The Political Subdivision is a Road Authority as defined in Minnesota Statutes §160.02 (subd.
25); and
3. County has determined that a portion of County Highway No. 117 lying northerly of Trunk
Highway No. 5 to the Hennepin County border in the City of Chanhassen ("Roadway
Segment") is no longer needed for county highway purposes; and
4. County has determined that the Roadway Segment will revert to another road authority in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes §162.02 and §163.11 and County has further determined
that the Political Subdivision is the proper road authority; and.
5. The parties have entered into this Agreement to provide for the orderly reversion of the
Roadway Segment to the jurisdiction of the Political Subdivision.
AGREEMENT
1. Effective Date; Survival of Terms
This Agreement will be effective on the date last signed below by the parties. This Agreement
will remain in effect until County has served a Notice of Release and made payments (if any)
as required by this Agreement. All clauses which impose obligations continuing in their nature
and which must survive in order to give effect to their meaning will survive the expiration of
the Agreement.
2. Identification of County Highway Segment; Right-of-Way Determination
The Roadway Segment covered by this Agreement is described as County Highway No.117,
lying northerly of Trunk Highway No. 5 to the Hennepin County border as depicted on the
421
Page | 2
attached exhibit. County will determine the final right-of-way limits prior to transfer of title to
the Political Subdivision.
3. Notice of Release; Conveyance Documents
3.1. Notice of Release. County will deliver a "Notice of Release" to the Political Subdivision,
releasing the Roadway Segment from County’s jurisdiction. Upon receipt of such notice,
the Political Subdivision will become the Road Authority with jurisdiction over the
Roadway Segment and will assume all responsibility for the operation, maintenance, and
reconstruction of the Roadway Segment and of all structures and facilities that are a part
of the Roadway Segment, except for the maintenance as specified in Article 5.2.
3.2. Conveyance Documents. Subsequent to issuing the Notice of Release, County will
prepare and execute necessary and appropriate documents conveying County’s interest
in the Roadway Segment to the Political Subdivision.
4. Delivery of Records
Following delivery of the Notice of Release, County will provide the Political Subdivision
with available records concerning the Roadway Segment. Such records must be in County’s
possession, and will be released only if such release is lawful under the provisions of the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. Such records may include the following:
a) A list of active maintenance agreements, including signal and routine maintenance
agreements with other governmental agencies that will be cancelled, and a list of
agreements with utility companies that will be cancelled;
b) Records concerning utility permits, drainage permits, driveway and other access
permits, advertising and sign permits, and other limited-use permits;
c) Construction plans and records, as-built construction plans (if available);
d) Bridge inspection reports and ratings;
e) Aerial photos and other photo and video files, in either hard copy or digital form;
f) Right-of-way maps and parcel files;
g) Inventory Data;
h) Pavement condition ratings;
i) Traffic signal files including timing sequence information and repair history;
j) Accident reports and statistics;
k) Most current traffic counts;
l) Alignment ties, horizontal and vertical control monuments and related data;
m) Partially or fully completed plans for construction projects;
n) Road opening and right-of-way documentation;
o) Speed studies;
5. Maintenance
5.1. Prior to Release. Prior to the Political Subdivision’s receipt of the Notice of Release,
maintenance of the Roadway Segment will continue to be provided by County, or by the
party performing such maintenance under an existing agreement with County. If
maintenance is being provided by the Political Subdivision under an agreement with
422
Page | 3
County, the Political Subdivision will receive a prorated payment for maintenance
performed up to the date of receipt of the Notice of Release.
5.2. Upon Release. Upon receipt of the Notice of Release, the Political Subdivision will
become the roadway authority responsible for maintenance of the Roadway Segment,
except that County will perform snow and ice removal of the Roadway Segment in
accordance with the County’s adopted Snow and Ice Policy beginning at the Notice of
Release through May 1, 2023, at no cost to the Political Subdivision. The Political
Subdivision will thereafter be responsible for performing and paying for all maintenance
and reconstruction of the Roadway Segment, including all structures and facilities that
constitute a part of such roadway, except that County will reimburse the Political
Subdivision for actual snow and ice removal costs performed to adopted standards of the
Political Subdivision for the Roadway Segment incurred between May 1, 2023 and May
1, 2024 if the new pavement, pavement markings, traffic signage and safety features of
construction project necessary for safe operation is not substantially complete by
November 15, 2023.
6. Responsibility for Claims
Notwithstanding anything in Section 8 to the contrary, County will remain responsible, to the
extent authorized by Minnesota Statutes §466 and other applicable law, for claims related to
construction, maintenance, and operation of the Roadway Segment during the period when it
was a county highway, even if such claims are filed after the Political Subdivision receives the
Notice of Release. The Political Subdivision will be responsible for claims arising out of its
own construction, maintenance, or operation of the Roadway Segment after it received the
Notice of Release.
7. Turnback Funds
7.1 No Turnback Funds Applied. After serving the Notice of Release, County and Political
Subdivision will perform a construction project to bring the Roadway Segment up to a
satisfactory condition and agreed upon improvements. Therefore, no turnback funds will
be available to the Political Subdivision for the Roadway Segment, as agreed upon in a
joint powers agreement, County Contract No. 21-451.
7.2 Eligibility – Construction and Related Costs. The expenses that are eligible for funding
from the County for work related to the Roadway Segment are authorized in a separate
joint powers agreement, County Contract No. 21-451.
7.3 Payment Schedule – Construction and Related Costs. Funds from the County will be
available for eligible costs, as specified in Article 7.2, in calendar years 2022, 2023 and
2024. County has allocated County Transportation Sales Tax funding to the County’s 5-
year capital improvement program for this construction project. The availability of these
funds is contingent on County Board of Commissioners approval and appropriation in
each County budget year.
7.4 County’s Maximum Obligation. County’s maximum obligation, beyond the eligible
costs as specified in Article 7.2, under this Agreement is $10,000.00 for maintenance as
423
Page | 4
specified in Article 5.2. This obligation may be increased only by amending this
Agreement.
8. Release of Claims; Covenant not to Sue
By accepting the payment provided for in this Agreement, the Political Subdivision releases
County from any and all claims related to the condition of the Roadway Segment, regardless
of whether such claims result from surface or sub-surface conditions, and regardless of whether
such conditions were known or unknown at the time of reversion. In consideration of the
turnback payment provided by County, the Political Subdivision covenants not to sue County
or official with respect to County’s decision to make the reversion or for any claim arising out
of the condition of the Roadway Segment.
9. General Provisions
9.1. Venue. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this Agreement, or its breach, must be in
the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Carver County,
Minnesota.
9.2. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated only by mutual written agreement of
the parties.
9.3. Suspension. County may suspend its payment obligations under this Agreement in the
event of a total or partial government shutdown. The period of suspension will end when
County is legally authorized to resume such payments.
9.4. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found to be invalid or unenforceable,
such provision will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this
Agreement, which will remain in force and effect.
9.5. Merger. This Agreement contains all prior negotiations and agreements between County
and the Political Subdivision. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether
written or oral, may be used to bind either party.
9.6. Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be
effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and
approved this Agreement, or their successors in office.
9.7. Government Data. This Agreement, and any data exchanged by the parties pursuant to
this Agreement, will be "government data" and subject to the requirements of the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.
9.8. State Audits. The books, records, documents, and accounting practices and procedures
of the Political Subdivision relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by
County and the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of
six years.
424
Page | 5
10. Additional Provisions
None.
THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
425
Page | 6
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed.
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
Mayor
Date:
Attest:
City Manager
Date:
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
Date:
County of Carver, Minnesota
County Board Chair
Date:
Attest:
County Administrator
Date:
Approved As To Form:
County Attorney
Date:
426
Redwin
g
LaneW
e
st78th S treet
Lake D riveWestParkR oad
CenturyBoulevardLakeSu s anHills D riveAudubon RoadR ubyL
aneFawnHill
Roa
d MurrayHillRoadLakeLu cyRoad YosemiteAvenueWoodDuck L aneManchesterDriveLongacre sDri v e Pearl
DriveSton e CreekD r ive UticaLaneTecumsehL ane
Paisley P a t hGunflintTrail Te t onLaneHighoverDriveO rchar d L a n e
T imberwood
DriveW al nut Cur veRidgeviewW ay
C o u l t e r B o ule vard
Lilac Lane
Her o n Drive ParkDr
i
v
eBentB
o
wTrailPon
t
iac Ci rcleC
h
aparral
L
aneHunt erDrive Della Drive
PeaveyRoadNorexDr
i
veA r b o r e t u m B o u le v ardHazeltine BoulevardGalpinBoulevardP
o
we
r
s
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
15
17
117
Hennepin
County
Carver
County
7
41
5
Project Location Map
This map w as created using a compilation of
information and data from various City, County,
State, and Federal offices. It is not a surveyed or
legally recorded map and is intended to be used
as a reference. Carver County is not responsible
for any inaccuracies contained herein.
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Public Works D ivision
11360 H wy 212, Suite 1
Cologne, MN 55322
(952) 466-5200
Created: 9/23/2021
Project Location
Beginning of Project
End of Project
Exhibit A
427
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION ON
COUNTY HIGHWAY 117
THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION ON COUNTY HIGHWAY 117,
("Agreement") shall be in effect from the date of execution and shall continue until the completion of
the Project, by and between the City of Chanhassen (“City”), and the County of Carver ("County")
(each sometimes hereinafter called "Party" and both sometimes collectively "Parties") the Parties
being governmental and political subdivisions of the State of Minnesota.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, each of the Parties has the authority to construct, maintain, repair, and improve
public streets within their respective jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, County Highway 117 (CH 117) is a duly dedicated public street, located within
the corporate limits of City; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to undertake a joint project involving grading, aggregate base,
pavement surfacing, curb & gutter, sidewalk, storm sewer, stormwater management, lighting,
landscaping and other incidentals, and to share the costs of such improvement as herein provided; and
WHEREAS, the authority of the Parties to enter into this Agreement is provided by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants of each to the
other contained in this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto do covenant and agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE AGREEMENT
Section 1.01. Purposes. The purpose of this Agreement is to define the rights and obligations
of the City and the County with respect to the Project and the sharing of the duties and costs of the
Project.
Section 1.02. Cooperation. The City and the County shall cooperate and use their reasonably
best efforts to ensure an expeditious implementation of the various provisions of this Agreement. The
Parties agree in good faith to undertake resolution of disputes, if any, in an equitable and timely
manner. The Project will be open to inspection of duly authorized representatives of the Parties at
any time during normal business hours and as often as reasonably deem ed necessary.
Section 1.03. Relationship To Other Contracts. The City and the County acknowledge
that Contract Documents will be entered into by the City on behalf of the Parties with respect to the
Project, and that Change Orders or other documents may be entered into by the City on behalf of the
Parties, with respect to the Project. This Agreement shall be construed so as to give the fullest effect
to its provisions, consistent with the provisions of the other contracts and documents referred to above.
428
Page | 2
Section 1.04. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period commencing on the
date hereof and terminating on the date the Project is completed, accepted by the Parties and all
amounts owed by one Party to the other have been paid in full.
Section 1.05. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct as of the date hereof and
constitute a part of this Agreement.
Section 1.06 Enabling Authority. Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, authorizes two
or more governmental units to jointly exercise any power common to the contracting Parties.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
Section 2.01. Definitions. In this Agreement the following terms shall have the following
meanings unless the context requires otherwise:
(a) Agreement: this Agreement, as it may be amended, supplemented, or restated from
time to time.
(b) Change Order: a written order, change order or supplemental agreement to the
Contractor approved in writing, which may be electronic, by both Parties hereto and
signed by the City Representative on behalf of the Parties authorizing a change in the
work included within the Contract Documents and/or an adjustment in the price and/or
an adjustment in the construction schedule, issued after execution of the contract for
the construction of the Project.
(c) City: the City of Chanhassen.
(d) City Representative: Charles Howley, P.E., LEED AP, City of Chanhassen Public
Works Director / City Engineer.
(e) City/County Costs: the direct and indirect costs of City and County employees
performing services on behalf of the Project, and other incidentals.
(f) Design Phase Professional Services Costs: the fees and costs for all professional
services performed in design phase activities for the Project.
(g) Construction Phase Professional Services Costs: the fees and costs for all
professional services performed in construction phase activities for the Project.
(h) Contract Documents: drawings; Engineers Estimate; specifications; general and
special conditions; addenda, if any; Change Orders; and the construction contract for
the Project; approved by the Parties, or their respective representatives.
(i) Contractor: the person or entity that is awarded the contract for the construction of
429
Page | 3
the Project.
(j) County: Carver County.
(k) County Representative: Lyndon Robjent, P.E., Carver County Engineer.
(l) Engineers Estimate: the professional engineer’s opinion of probable cost prior to
the bidding of the Project, which encompasses all projected costs tabulated for each
Party.
(m) Project: All work required to program, implement and construct all of the
improvements to CH 117 within the Project Location including grading, aggregate
base, bituminous pavement surfacing, curb & gutter, sidewalk, trails, storm sewer,
stormwater management, lighting, landscaping, watermain, sanitary sewer, and other
incidentals.
(n) Project Costs: all costs for and associated with the programing, implementation and
construction of the Project, excluding Design Phase Professional Services Costs,
Construction Phase Professional Services Costs, and City/County Costs.
(o) Project Location: CH 117 from Trunk Highway 5 to the Hennepin County Border,
as generally depicted in Exhibit A.
(p) Uncontrollable Circumstances: the occurrence or non-occurrence of acts or events
beyond the reasonable control of the Party relying thereon, and not the result of willful
or negligent action or inaction of the Party claiming the event as an Uncontrollable
Circumstance, that materially adversely affects the performance of the Party claiming
the event as an Uncontrollable Circumstance including but not limited to the
following:
(1) Acts of God, including, but not limited to floods, ice storms, blizzards,
tornadoes, landslides, lighting and earthquakes (but not including reasonably
anticipated weather conditions for the geographic area), riots insurrections,
war or civil disorder affecting the performance of work, blockades, power or
other utility failure, and fires or explosions.
(2) The adoption of or change in any federal, state, or local laws, rules,
regulations, ordinances, permits, or licenses, or changes in the interpretation
of such laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, or licenses by a court or
public agency having appropriate jurisdiction after the date of the execution
of this Agreement.
(3) A suspension, termination, interruption, denial, or failure of renewal of any
permit, license, consent, authorization, or approval essential to the
construction of the Project.
430
Page | 4
(4) Orders and/or judgment of any federal, state, or local court, administrative
agency, or governmental body, provided, however, that the contesting in good
faith by such Party of any such order and/or judgment shall not constitute or
be construed to constitute a willful or negligent action or inaction of such
Party.
(5) Strikes or other such labor disputes shall not be considered an Uncontrollable
Circumstance, unless such strike or labor dispute involves persons with whom
the Parties have no employment relationship and the Parties, or either of them,
cannot, using best efforts, obtain substitute performance.
ARTICLE III
ALLOCATION OF DUTIES
Section 3.01. Design Phase Activities. Design phase activities, including, but not limited
to, field surveys, right of way plats, design, engineering, cost estimating, right of way acquisition,
public engagement, and other matters, shall be completed by the Parties as follows:
See attached Exhibit B.
Section 3.02. Construction Phase Activities. Construction phase activities, including, but
not limited to, the bid process, preparation of contract documents, awarding of contract, construction
inspection and surveying and other matters, shall be completed by the Parties as follows:
See attached Exhibit B.
Section 3.03. Contract Award. The Contract Documents shall be approved in writing,
which may be electronic, by the Parties prior to the solicitation of bids. In accordance with the
applicable provisions of Minnesota Statutes, City will cause bids to be received by it for the
construction of the Project and, subject to approval by the County if the low responsible bidder is
more than the Engineers Estimate, shall award the contract for the construction of the Project to the
lowest responsible bidder.
Section 3.04. Project Construction. Subject to Uncontrollable Circumstances, the Parties
shall cause the Project to be constructed in accordance with the Contract Documents. The County
shall have the right to review and approve of any proposed changes to the plans and specifications as
they relate to County’s cost participation prior to the work being performed.
Section 3.05. Maintenance Upon Project Completion and Final Acceptance. Highway
maintenance shall be completed by the Parties, upon project completion and final acceptance of the
Project, as follows:
The City will perform all maintenance responsibilities on all current streets under the City jurisdiction
and will perform maintenance responsibilities on Galpin Boulevard north of Trunk Highway 5
(current County Highway 117) upon release by the County to the City in accordance with a separate
turnback agreement between the Parties.
431
Page | 5
ARTICLE IV
PROJECT COST SHARING
Section 4.01. Allocation.
(a) The Project Costs for all items shall be divided between the City and County as follows:
See attached Exhibit C.
(b) The Design Phase Professional Services Costs for all items shall be divided between the
Parties as follows:
See attached Exhibit C.
(c) The Construction Phase Professional Services Costs for all items shall be divided between
the Parties as follows:
See attached Exhibit C.
(d) All other costs including, but not limited to City/County Costs, shall be allocated between
the Parties as follows:
See attached Exhibit C.
Section 4.02. Payments to Contractor. The City shall make partial progress payments to
the Contractor and, upon approval of both Parties hereto, the final payment to the Contractor in
accordance with the Contract Documents. The designated County Representative shall have the right
to approve of any Change Orders prepared by the City that affect the County’s share of the
construction cost.
The County further agrees that it will participate in the settlement of any claim from the City's
contractor for the Project that involve delays attributable to unreasonable delays in approval by the
County for plan or specification changes deemed necessary by the City Engineer or staff. The amount
of the County’s participation in any such claim shall be commensurate with the percentage of delay
directly attributable to County’s actions.
Section 4.03. Adjustments and Reconciliation. To the extent that the actual value of any
item included in an invoice cannot be accurately determined at the time of submission of the invoice,
such item shall be invoiced on an estimated basis and an adjustment shall be made to reflect the
difference between such estimated amount and the actual amount of such item on the next invoice
after determination of the actual amount.
Prior to final acceptance of the Project, the designated City representative shall provide County with
a reconciliation of all costs for the Project and the respective contributions of the Parties for the review
and approval of the Parties.
432
Page | 6
Section 4.04. Exclusive Responsibility. All aspects of application for State of Minnesota
for State and Federal Funds and the grant thereof by the State, are the exclusive responsibility of the
City, including but not limited to the investment, expenditure, and allocation of such funds. It is
specifically agreed that any interest on the investment of any such funds is the sole property of the
City, to use as the City shall see fit.
Section 4.05. Payment to City. The County agrees to reimburse the City for costs incurred,
pursuant to Section 4.01. Unless previously deposited as provided herein, the County is responsible
to pay these monies to the City within thirty (30) days of being invoiced for costs incurred or services
performed. Costs will be invoiced at the completion of each Project phase and upon final acceptance
of the Project by the Parties, unless an alternate schedule is mutually agreed upon in writing by the
authorized representatives of the Parties.
At the start of the Design Phase and Construction of the Project, City shall invoice the County to
deposit with the City ninety five (95) percent of the estimated County’s share in the Design Phase
Professional Services Costs and Construction Phase Professional Services Costs.
After an award by City to the successful bidder on the Project, City shall invoice the County to deposit
with the City ninety five (95) percent of the estimated County’s share in the Project Costs.
Section 4.06. Payment to County. The City agrees to reimburse the County for costs
incurred, pursuant to Section 4.01. The City is responsible to pay these monies to the County within
thirty (30) days of being invoiced for costs incurred or services performed. Costs will be invoiced at
the completion of each Project phase and upon final acceptance of the Project by the Parties, unless
an alternate schedule is mutually agreed upon in writing by the authorized representatives of the
Parties.
ARTICLE V
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 5.01. Notices. All notices or communications required or permitted pursuant to this
Agreement shall be either hand delivered or mailed to City and County, certified mail, return-receipt
requested, at the following address:
City: Charles Howley, PE, LEED AP
Public Works Director / City Engineer
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
County: Lyndon Robjent, PE
County Engineer
Carver County Public Works
11360 Hwy 212 West, Suite 1
433
Page | 7
Cologne, MN 55322
Either Party may change its address or authorized representative by written notice delivered to the
other Party pursuant to this Section 5.01.
Section 5.02. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in more than one counterpart,
each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall be deemed a
single instrument.
Section 5.03. Survival of Terms, Representations and Warranties. The representations,
warranties, covenants, and agreements of the Parties under this Agreement, and the remedies of either
Party for the breach of such representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements by the other Party
shall survive the execution and termination of this Agreement. The terms of Sections 3.05, 5.14,
5.15, 5.16 and 5.17 shall survive the expiration, termination or withdrawal from this Agreement.
Section 5.04. Non-Assignability. Neither the City nor the County shall assign any interest
in this Agreement nor shall transfer any interest in the same, whether by subcontract, assignment or
novation, without the prior written consent of the other Party. Such consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
Section 5.05. Alteration. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between
the Parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and
negotiations between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this
Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any
alteration, variation, modification or waiver of the provisions of the Agreement shall be valid only
after it has been reduced to writing and duly signed by all Parties.
Section 5.06. Waiver. The waiver of any of the rights and/or remedies arising under the
terms of this Agreement on any one occasion by any Party hereto shall not constitute a waiver or any
rights and/or remedies in respect to any subsequent breach or default of the terms of this Agreement.
The rights and remedies provided or referred to under the terms of this Agreement are cumulative and
not mutually exclusive.
Section 5.07. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any
paragraph, section, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held
to be contrary to law, or contrary to any rule or regulation having the force and effect of law, such
decision shall not affect the remaining portions of this Agreement.
Section 5.08. Interpretation According to Minnesota Law. The Laws of the State of
Minnesota shall apply to this Agreement.
Section 5.09. Final Payment. Before final payment is made to the Contractor, the Contractor
shall provide a certificate of compliance from the Commissioner of Revenue certifying that the
Contractor and any out-of-state subcontractors have complied with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 290.92.
434
Page | 8
Section 5.10. Headings. The headings to the various sections of this Agreement are inserted
only for convenience of reference and are not intended, nor shall they be construed, to modify, define,
limit, or expand the intent of the Parties as expressed in this Agreement.
Section 5.11. Further Actions. The Parties agree to execute such further documents and
take such further actions as may reasonably be required or expedient to carry out the provisions and
intentions of this Agreement, or any agreement or document relating hereto or entered into in
connection herewith.
Section 5.12. Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure solely to
the benefit of the Parties hereto and their permitted assigns, and nothing in this Agreement, express
or implied, is intended to confer upon any other person any rights or remedies of any nature under or
by reason of this Agreement.
Section 5.13. Employees. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of
County and all other employees of said County engaged in the performance of any work or services
required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall be considered employees of
County only and not of City and that any and all claims that may or might arise under Workman’s
Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and
any and all claims made by any third Parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part
of County employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered
herein shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of County.
It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of City and all other employees of said City
engaged in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed
by City shall be considered employees of City only and not of County and that any and all claims
that may or might arise under Workman’s Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf
of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third Parties as a
consequence of any act or omission on the part of said City employees which so engaged on any
of the work or services to be rendered herein shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of City.
Section 5.14. Indemnification. The Parties’ total liability under this Agreement shall be
governed by Minn. Statutes, Section 471.59, Subd. 1a.
Each Party agrees that it will be responsible for the acts or omissions of its officials, agents, and
employees, and the results thereof, in carrying out the terms of this Agreement, to the extent
authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts/omissions of the other Party and the
results thereof. For purposes of determining total liability for damages, the participating
governmental units are considered to be a single governmental unit, the total liability of which
shall not exceed the limits for a single governmental unit as provided in Minn. Statutes, Section
466.04, Subd. 1.
Each Party agrees to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the other Party, its officials, agents,
and employees, from any liability, loss, or damages the other Party may suf fer or incur as the
result of demands, claims, judgments, or cost arising out of or caused by the indemnifying
Party’s negligence in the performance of its respective obligations under this Agreement. This
435
Page | 9
provision shall not be construed nor operate as a waiver of any applicable limitation of liability,
defenses, immunities, or exceptions by statute or common law.
To the full extent permitted by law, actions by the Parties pursuant to this Agreement are
intended to be and shall be construed as a "cooperative activity" and it is the intent of the Parties
that they shall be deemed a "single governmental unit" for the purposes of liability, all as set
forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subd. la(a); provided further that for purposes of
that statute, each Party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for the acts or
omissions of the other Party.
The Parties of this Agreement are not liable for the acts or omissions of the other participants to
this Agreement except to the extent to which they have agreed in writing to be responsible for
acts or omissions of the other Parties.
Section 5.15. Records – Availability and Access
A. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.05, Subd. 5, the City agrees that the County,
the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal
business hours and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to
and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers,
records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the City and
involve transactions relating to this Agreement.
City agrees to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of termination
of this Agreement.
B. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.05, Subd. 5, the County agrees that the City,
the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal
business hours and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to
and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers,
records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the County
and involve transactions relating to this Agreement.
County agrees to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of
termination of this Agreement.
Section 5.16. Data Practices. Each Party, its employees, agents, owners, partners, and
subcontractors agree to abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 and implementing regulations, if applicable, and all other
applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or
confidentiality, and as any of the same may be amended.
Section 5.17. Nondiscrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, the City
and the County agree to the following: No person shall, on the grounds of race, color, religion,
age, sex, disability, marital status, public assistance status, criminal record, creed or national origin
be excluded from full employment right in, participation in, be denied the benefits of or be
otherwise subjected to discrimination under any and all applicable Federal and State laws against
436
Page | 10
discrimination.
Section 5.18. Default and Withdrawal. Default in this Agreement may occur when a
Party fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work
as to endanger the performance of the Agreement. Unless the Party’s default is excused by the
non-defaulting Party, the non-defaulting Party may, upon written notice to the defaulting Party
representative listed herein, cancel this Agreement in its entirety as indicated below.
Any Party may withdraw from this Agreement with or without cause by providing thirty (30) days’
prior written notice to the other Parties herein. Only the governing bodies of the Participating
Parties have authority to act pursuant to this provision of the Agreement.
Each Party to this agreement reserves the right to withdraw from and cancel this agreement within
30 days from the opening of bids for the project in the event either or both Parties consider any or
all bids unsatisfactory; the withdrawal from or cancellation of the agreement to be accomplished
by either or both Parties within 30 days of opening of bids by serving a written notice thereof upon
the other, unless this right is waived by both Parties in writing.
Section 5.19. Third Party. This Agreement does not create any rights, claims or benefits
inuring to any person that is not a Party hereto nor create or establish any third Party beneficiary.
437
Page | 11
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The Parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed.
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
Mayor
Date:
Attest:
City Manager
Date:
Approved As To Form:
City Attorney
Date:
County of Carver, Minnesota
County Board Chair
Date:
Attest:
County Administrator
Date:
Approved As To Form:
County Attorney
Date:
438
Redwin
g
LaneW
e
st78th S treet
Lake D riveWestParkR oad
CenturyBoulevardLakeSu s anHills D riveAudubon RoadR ubyL
aneFawnHill
Roa
d MurrayHillRoadLakeLu cyRoad YosemiteAvenueWoodDuck L aneManchesterDriveLongacre sDri v e Pearl
DriveSton e CreekD r ive UticaLaneTecumsehL ane
Paisley P a t hGunflintTrail Te t onLaneHighoverDriveO rchar d L a n e
T imberwood
DriveW al nut Cur veRidgeviewW ay
C o u l t e r B o ule vard
Lilac Lane
Her o n Drive ParkDr
i
v
eBentB
o
wTrailPon
t
iac Ci rcleC
h
aparral
L
aneHunt erDrive Della Drive
PeaveyRoadNorexDr
i
veA r b o r e t u m B o u le v ardHazeltine BoulevardGalpinBoulevardP
o
we
r
s
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
15
17
117
Hennepin
County
Carver
County
7
41
5
Project Location Map
This map w as created using a compilation of
information and data from various City, County,
State, and Federal offices. It is not a surveyed or
legally recorded map and is intended to be used
as a reference. Carver County is not responsible
for any inaccuracies contained herein.
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Public Works D ivision
11360 H wy 212, Suite 1
Cologne, MN 55322
(952) 466-5200
Created: 9/23/2021
Project Location
Beginning of Project
End of Project
Exhibit A
439
Highway 117 Project
Exhibit B – Allocation of Duties
Design Phase Activities
City will complete all design phase activities of the Project and procure necessary Design Phase
Professional Services.
Construction Phase Activities
City will complete all construction phase activities of the Project and procure necessary
Construction Phase Professional Services.
440
Highway 117 Project
Exhibit C – Project Cost Sharing
County and City agree to cost share as follows:
Project Costs
The County and City agree to cost share Project Costs by the following:
1. All Project Costs, excluding public watermain and public sanitary sewer City utilities, shall
be split 75% County and 25% City responsibility. The Project will be designed to accepted
State Aid design standards for the project traffic and reasonably conform to the preliminary
layout scope as shown in Exhibit D.
2. All Project Costs for public watermain and sanitary sewer City utilities shall be 100% City
responsibility.
3. The County and City agree to evenly split (50% County/50% City) all right of way
acquisition costs. Right of way acquisition includes all costs related to the acquisition of
property except professional services.
4. The County agrees to transfer property or grant easement rights to the City of County
owned property needed for the Project at no cost to the City.
5. The Parties agree to enter into a turnback agreement of County Road 117 (Galpin
Boulevard) from Trunk Highway 5 to the Hennepin County border concurrently with this
agreement. Further, City will cause a right of way plat to be developed that includes the
existing right of way of said segment of highway turnback and any additional right of way
needed for the Project. The turnback and release of said County Road 117 segment from
County to the City will occur as specified in said turnback agreement.
6. The City agrees to pay for all City requested improvements that are included in the Project,
that are not reasonably necessary to carry out the scope of the Project as shown in Exhibit
D. The Engineers Estimate and any Change Orders will show such City requested
improvement costs.
Design Phase Professional Services Costs
The County and City agree to cost share Design Phase Professional Services Costs by the
following:
1. The County and City agree to evenly split (50% County/50% City) all right of way related
professional services costs.
441
2.All remaining professional services costs, except professional services for public
watermain and sanitary sewer City utilities will be split 75% County and 25% City
responsibility.
3.All professional services costs for public watermain and sanitary sewer City utilities shall
be 100% City responsibility.
Construction Phase Professional Services Costs
The County and City agree to cost share Construction Phase Professional Services Costs by the
following:
1.The County and City agree to evenly split (50% County/50% City) all right of way related
professional services costs.
2.All remaining professional services costs will be prorated and split based on the
construction cost share of the Parties.
City/County Costs
The County and City agree to cost share City/County Costs by the following:
1.Other than as specified in the following paragraph, the Parties agree to not bill each other
for direct and indirect internal staff costs for the Project in order to support the City and
County administration of the Project.
2.All City direct and indirect costs of staff directly supporting the Project and other incidental
costs will be prorated and split based on the construction cost share of the Parties and will
considered the same as professional services.
442
Exhibit D
443
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item 2022 Building Permit Activity January Year to Date
File No.Item No: K.1
Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION
Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
None
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority Development & Redevelopment
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Building Permit Activity - January
444
2022 Building
Permit Activity
JANUARYYTDCity of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
952-227-1100
Residential Single-Family 2 2
Residential Townhomes 00
Apartrnents/Senior Facilities 0 0
Total Residential 2')
INew1
0Redeveloped0
Remodeled 4 4
Total Commercial 5 )
Commercial Building Permits l" Quarter 2nd Quarter 3'd Quarter 4't Qurrter
Single-Family I-ots 90
Residential Tounhome I-ots 53
Total Available Lots 143
Available Lot Inventory
of Quarter)
l" Quarter 2ud Quarter 3d Quarter 4tb Quarter
(end
2Single-Family 55 19 40 68 98
12 56 18 0Townhomes
Apartments/Senior
Facilities 0 268 0 110
Commercial 67 58 62 66 5
7Total Number of All
Permits 134 431 t20 134 282
2020201920172018 2022
gi\adminforms\building perlnil activity 2022 r,td.doc
\r
fl[
\
=
4 \,l
0
Residential Building Permits l"t Quarter 2"d Qurrter 3'd Quarter 4th Quarter Total YTD
Total
YTD
Total Permit
History 2021
0 0
0 0
'74
445
I:e sI !a aI!7a a:Is ,g !3 t
=
a ?-a 1
?
::a I a a
:a
=
a a gI
z
a a !
It a
=d.a a
3
446
City Council Item
February 14, 2022
Item CenterPoint Energy Public Hearings Notice dated February 4, 2022
File No.Item No: K.2
Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
CP Energy Public Hearings Notice 02-04-2022
447
[o vre spond trte
505 Nicollet Mall
P.O. Bo 59038
Minneapolis, MN 55459-0038
February 4,2022
To \Mom lt May Concern:
I am writing to inform you that Administrative Law Judge Ann O'Reilly is holding four public hearings on
CenterPoint Energy's rate increase proposal- For more on the public hearings, please see the enclosed
copy of our Notice of Public Hearings for CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Customers.
Please contact me if you have any questions orwould like additional information about the filing.
Additional information about our Rate Case is available at our website at
CenterPointEnergy. corn/RateCase.
Sincerely,
Seth DeMerritt
Manager, Regulatory
612-393-6216
Enc.
Notice of Public Hearings for CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Customers
OW,
448
RATE INCREASE NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNESOTA CUSTOMERS
CenterPoint Energy has asked the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) to approve an increase
to natural gas rates for distribution service. The requested increase is for about 6.5 percent or 567.1
million per year. The requested increase would add about S+.OS to a typical residential custome/s
monthly bill.
The MPUC may either approve or deny the requested changes, and may approve a lesser or greater
increase than was requested for any customer class or classes of service.
The MPUC will likely make its decision on our rate request in the fourth quarter of 2022. lf final rates are
lower than interim (temporary) rates, we will refund customers the difference with interest. lf final rates
are higher than interim rates, we will not charge customers the difference.
lf you move before a refund is issued and we cannot find you, your refund may be treated as abandoned
property and sent to the Minnesota Department of Commerce, Unclaimed Property Unit. You can check
for unclaimed property at www.missingmoney.com. To make sure we can send you any refund owed,
please provide a forwarding address when you stop service.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Administrative Law Judge Ann O'Reilly will hold two in-person public hearings and two virtual public
hearings so that customers have an opportunity to comment on the company's request. Any CenterPoint
Energy customer or other person may attend or provide comments at the hearlngs. You are invited to
comment on the adequacy and quality of CenterPoint Energy's service, the level of rates, or other related
matters. You do not need to be represented by an attorney. The hearings will begin at their scheduled
time and adjourn after everyone present has had an opportunity to comment or ask questions.
Bad weather? Find out if a hearing is canceled - call (toll free) 855-731-6208 or 65t-20L-2213 or visit
mn.gov/puc.
Golden Valley Library
830 Winnetka Ave N
Golden Valley, MN 55427
EVENT CENTER
10 Civic Center Plaza
Mankato, MN 55001
449
Virtual Public Hearings
Public hearings have been scheduled as follows to be held via video conference.
March 1, 2022, at 1:00 p.m, and 5:00 p.m.
Attend by lnternet Connection (Audio and Videol
To join the virtual hearing using a computer, tablet or smart phone, where you will have audio and video
capability, go to:: IEpg:Ztr jllllcsg(e.wcb ln the gray box where it says, "Enter Meeting
lnformation," type the Event Number below for the public hearing date you are attending:
Event Number:
249234o 7a66
Event Password, if
needed: MnPI.JCI
Event Number:
248,340'536?7
Event Password, if
needed: MnPUC!
Directions for Appearint via WebEx.
. Log on 5 to 15 minutes before the hearing begins. You will be asked to join the hearing through a Webex
application or through a plug-in for your web browser.
. Enter the Event Number shown in the box above.
. Next you will be asked to enter your name, your email address, and an event password (if requlred).
After entering this information, click '1oin Nora/' and you will be granted access to the virtual hearing.
. When you enter the hearing your microphone will be muted. lf you would like to ask a question or make
a comment during the meeting, use the chat function to send a message to the meeting moderator, who
will place you in the queue to comment. When it is your time turn to comment, your name will be called
and your line will be unmuted. You willthen be able to ask questions or make a comment.
To Attend by Telephone (Audio Only)
lf you do not have access to a computer, tablet, or smart phone, or if you would prefer to attend the
hearing via audio only, you mayjoin using anytype oftelephone. You do not need internet access to ca ll
into the hearing, however, you will only be able to hear (not see) the speakers. You will still be able to
comment and ask questions.
Use the information in the box below to dial into the hearing. You will be asked to enter the access code
for the hearing, as set forth belowi
Phone:
1-855-282-6330
Access Code:
2492 340 7466
Phone:
1-855-282-6330
Access Code:
2483 405 3637
lf you would like to ask a question or make a comment during the hearing, press *3 on your telephone.
You will then be placed into the queue to comment. When it is your turn to speak, the last few digits of
450
your telephone number will be announced by the moderator and your line will be unmuted, allowing
you to be heard.
Public Hearing and Process lnformation
Administrative Law Judge Ann O'Reilly will preside over the public hearings and will provide the
Commission with findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations after the conclusion of the
evidentiary hearing.
The purpose ofthe public hearings is to receive public input on the proposed rate increase. Atthe public
hearings, interested persons have the opportunity to: (1) ask questions ofthe utility and agency staff; and
(2) offerverbaland written comments on the merits ofthe proposed rate increase. Members ofthe public
may pa rticipate without needing to interven e as a pa rty. Representation by legal counsel is permitted but
not required.
Please note that the public hearings will end when all attendees present have had the opportunity to
comment and all other business has been concluded. You are encouraged to join the meeting at the
scheduled start time to be placed on the queue to comment. Commenters will be called in the order they
enter the queue. Therefore, it is advantageous to arriveatthe beginning ofthe hearing.
Written comments may be submitted during the comment period before and after the public hearings.
Follow the instructions below to provide written comment.
Please contact Cha rley Bruce at 651-201-2251 or charlev.bruce@state.mn.us or Tera 0ornfeld at 651-
201-2195 or tera.dornfeld@state.mn.us if you have questions on how to participate or have trouble
accessing the public hearing using telephone or internet.
WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
You can still submit comments even if you do not attend a public hearing.
Comment Period
Comments accepted through April 11, 2022, at 4:30 p,m.
. Comments must be received by 4:30 p.m. on the close ddte.
. Comments received dfter the comment period closes moy not be considered.
How to Submit a Written Comment
Written comments can be submitted via: (1) the Commlssion's ecomments website; (2) electronic mail;
(3) U.S. Mail; or (4) facsimile. To learn how to submit a comment in any of these ways, please visit
gp.g9y!99-select "Consumers" from the dropdown menu on the top of the page, then select "Public
Comments and How to Participate." This will take you to the Public Comment page, where you willfind
a list of ways to comment. Be sure to reference PUC Docket No. 21435 in the subject line of your
comment.
451
lf you do not have access to the internet, you may send or deliver your comment to:
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
121 7th Place East, Ste.350
5t. Paul, MN 55101
For assistance in submitting comments, or if you have questions, contact the Commission's Consumer
Affairs Office at:
Phone: 651-296-0406 or 800-657-3782
Email: consumer.puc@state.mn.us
Be sure to reference Docket Number 2L-435
lmportant: Comments can be reviewed by the public on the MPUC'S website, except in limited
circumstances consistent with the Minnesota Government Data Practlces Act. The MPUC does not edit
or delete personally identifying information or any other information from comments received.
EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS
Formal evidentiary hearings on CenterPoint Energy's proposal will be held on April 6, 7, and 8,2022,
starting at 9:30 a.m. each day. The evidentiary hearing will be held In Courtroom 1 at the Office of
Administrative Hearings at 600 South Robert Street, St. Paul, Minnesota. lndividuals who cannot attend
in person, may attend via Microsoft Teams (Teams), a video conferencing platform. Members of the
public who wish to attend the hearing through Teams may request an electronic invitation by contacting
Judge O'Reilly's legal assistant at michelle.severson@state.mn.us.
The purpose of the evidentiary hearing !s to allow CenterPoint Energy, the Minnesota Department of
Commerce - Division of Energy Resources, the Minnesota Office of Attorney General - Residential Utilities
Division, and parties who have formally joined the contested case, to present testimony and to cross-
examine each other's witnesses on the proposed rate increase.
lf you wish to formally intervene in this case, as a party to the litigation, you must serve and file a Petition
to lntervene, pursuant to Minn. R. 1400.6200.
TO LEARN MORE
CenterPoint Energy's current and proposed rate schedules are available at:
CenterPoint Energy
505 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis MN 55402
Phone 6L2-37 2-47 27 ot AOO-245-2377
Web http://wwuCenterPointEnergy.com/RateCase
Minnesota Department of Commerce
85 7th Place East, Suite 500, St. Paul, MN 55101
Phone: 651-539-1534
Web: https://www.edockets.state.mn.us/EFiling/search.,sp Select (2li in the year field, type (435) in
the number field, select Seorch, and the list of documents will appea r on the next page.
452
Questions about the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's review process?
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
L2L7th Place East, Suite 350
St. Paul, MN 55101
Phone: 651-296-0406 or 800-557-3782
Email: consumer.puc@state. mn.us
Anyone with hearing or speech disabilities may callthrough their preferred Telecommunications Relay.
Proposed Rate Increases
The table below shows the effect of both the interim and proposed rate changes on monthly bills for
residential, commercial and industrial customers with average natural gas use.
Customer Type
(usage in therms)
Avg monthly
usage in
therms
Avg monthly Avg monthly Avg monthly
bill: current bill: interim bill: proposed
rates rates rates
Residential 74 sos 577 s72
Commercial/lndustrial
up to 1,500/year
1,500 to 5,fl!0/year
5,0(X) or more/year
67
255
1,440 s1,095
sog ,tz sso
s21o sZrS Szso
s1,131 s1,136
Small Volume Dual Fuel Sales Service
up to 120,0fl/year
120,000 or more/vear
3,97t
L5,567
s2,310 52,382 52,482
s8,903 sg,rsz ss,4s0
Large Volume Dual Fuel Sales Service 42,091 523,466 523,981 524,403
Large Genera! Firm Sales Service 4L,602 s23,08s 523,776 s24,480
Demand charse (per Peak Dav)3,110
*Figures above are rounded (to the nearest whole number).
453
