1981 03 18
e
.
.
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
HELD MARCH 18, 1981, AT 7:30 P.M.
CHANHASSEN CITY HALL
Members Present: Chairman Art Partridge, Carol Watson, Ladd Conrad
Howard Noziska, M. Thompson and J. Thompson
Members Absent: Walter Thompson
Staff Present: Bob Waibel, Mark Koegler
Public Hearing on the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan:
Partridge stated that this is the last formal public hearing to
be held on the Comprehensive Plan review.
Koegler explained to the public why the City has a Comprehensive
Plan and what it involved. He explained that it is basically a
guide, not an ordinance for the City to follow in looking at
development.
Koegler stated that in April 1977, the City received a system
statement from the Metropolitan Council, which is the Regional
Planning Agency in St. Paul. It discusses park, and transportation
issues that are a Metropolitan investment so that they would know
what to expect in the future.
Koegler pointed out that the population figures from the Metro
Council and the City of Chanhassen1s projected population figures
do not agree. In 1977, Met Council stated that Chanhassen1s population
in 1990 should be 17,000 people, and by the year 2000 - 25,500W
In 1978, they did a re~analysis of those numbers and revised
the numbers down. The new numbers reflected 11,000 population in
1990 and 15,500 in the year 2000. Chanhassen was never in agree-
ment with the revision process, and documented what Chanhassen
feels should be a reasonable number for growth, those numbers all
point to the original numbers as being more valid than the revised
numbers. The Met Council has the authority to make the City make
changes to the plan.
Koegler explained the differences in opinion between the Metro Council
and the City regarding the MUSA Line.
Koegler explained further hhat the major elements of the Comp Plan
are land use, housing, tranportation, recreation and utilities.
Koegler briefly reviewed each of the areas mentioned.
Planning Commission Minutes
March 18, 1981
Page 2
e
Keogler stated that after the City Council has approved this plan,
then the Planning Commission will begin to look at the present
Zoning structure for the City. The Planning Commission will have
to revise the Zoning Ordinance to put it in conformance with the
Comp Plan.
There was no one present representing the public.
Watson made a motion, seconded by Conrad, to close the public
hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Minnetonka Labs:
Present: Ron Whipperman, Minnetonka Labs
Whipperman indicated that he is interested in purchasing 120 acres
to locate' Minnetonka Labs using a campus type layout. The property
is located at Highways 41 and 5. He indicated that they would like
to have plenty of room for expansion.
Whipperman stated that he is concerned about what is happening
with the MUSA Line and the Metro Council. The proposed property
is not located in the MUSA line. He asked the Planning Commission
if they would consider this application even though it is located
outside the MUSA Line.
e
Partridge s~ated that the property is zoned R-l now and is shown
in the Comp Plan as being agricultural land.
Whipperman stated that they would be willing to continue the Lake
Ann Interceptor to the property at their own expense. Partridge
stated that this proposal is not really what the City had in mind
for the area.
Whipperman presented a rough site plan for the Planning Commission
to review.
Conrad asked why the company is looking for so much property.
Whipperman stated that they wanted to keep with their image and
have a rural campus look. They also want to have plenty room
for expansion without having to look crowded. The company is
now located on approximately 30 acres. The firm has grown dramatically
in the last 4 years and plans to keep growing!:at that rate.
Watson stated that this proposal should be looked into.
Koegler explained that this request will have to go before the
Metro Council to request that the MUSA Line be located on that
property.
-
Waibel stated that he suggests that Minnetonka Labs make a formal
application to the Planning Commission and discuss with staff the
possibility of this request. He further suggested that this should
go before the City Council to get their comments on this request.
e
.
e
Planning Commission Minutes
March 18, 1981
Page 3
The Planning Commission suggested that Minnetonka Labs go before
the City Council to get their ideas on this request. The Planning
Commission stated that they feel this is a good idea and should
make an application to come before the Planning Commission with
their proposal. The Planning Commission asked staff to bring
this before the Metro Council to see if the MUSA Line can be
moved.