The URL can be used to link to this page

1. Hurt Variances PC DATE: October 18, 2005 1 CC DATE: November 14, 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN REVIEW DEADLINE: November 15, 2005 CASE #: 05-32 BY: JM STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Request for 4.5% hard surface coverage variance from the maximum 25% hard surface coverage restriction and a 5-foot side yard setback variance for the addition of a sport court on property located in the Single Family Residential District at 8491 Mission Hills Circle. The sport court has been built. LOCATION: Lot 6, Block 2, Marsh Glen 8491 Mission Hills Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 APPLICANT: Clint & Jennifer Hurt 8491 Mission Hills Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING: Single Family Residential (RSF) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential – Low Density (Net Density Range 1.2 – 4u/Acre) ACREAGE: 0.47 acre DENSITY: N/A SITE DATA SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a 4.5% hard surface coverage variance from the maximum 25% hard surface coverage restriction and a 5-foot side yard setback variance for the addition of a sport court. The sport court has already been built.Staff is recommending denial of this request. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Marshland TrltrC dribkcalBE lliH yaW noissiMW lliH yaW noissiMtrC eciR Hurt Variance Planning Case #05-32 October 18, 2005 Page 2 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Lake Susan M i s s i o n The subject property is located H i l l s e L l southeast of Great Plains a c n r i e C Boulevard and north of West d s v th l 86 Street on Mission Hills l l i B H Circle and is zoned Single SUBJECT SITE n s o n i Family Residential (RSF). The i M s a s l a P i applicant is requesting a 4.5% M y t f Hills a Mission i e e (which represents 926.78 square Crt l r d G C feet of site coverage) hard r t 1 M 0 surface coverage variance from 1 i H i s l n W 86th St l y s s o w D the maximum 25% hard surface i i s r o . H s i n M coverage restriction for the M H i s s i o n i H addition of a sport court, l i l l l Fr s i s s L c approximately 53’x40’, D a o r n . bringing the hard surface C e r t coverage to 29.5%. This W 86th St structure has already been built. APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Sec. 20-91. Zoning compliance review. (a) Zoning compliance review shall be required for the construction of structures which do not require building permits to determine compliance with zoning requirements such as setback, site coverage, structure height, etc. (b) Any zoning compliance review application that fails to meet zoning ordinance requirements shall be denied by the community development director. Impervious surface means any material that substantially reduces or prevents the infiltration of storm water. It shall include, but not be limited to, gravel driveways, parking area, buildings and structures. Hurt Variance Planning Case #05-32 October 18, 2005 Page 3 Sec. 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks. 25 percent (5) The maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces is . Sec. 20-904. Accessory structures. (3) Tennis courts and swimming pools may be located in rear yards with a minimum side and rear yard setback of ten feet, but must comply with applicable ordinary high water mark setbacks. Sec. 20-908. Yard regulations. (6) The placement of any structure within easements is prohibited, except for those structures specified herein. Fences may be allowed within an easement with an encroachment agreement if they do not alter the intended use of the easement. A driveway or sidewalk from the street to the house crossing drainage and utility easements at the front of the property are exempt from this requirement. Hurt Variance Planning Case #05-32 October 18, 2005 Page 4 BACKGROUND The subject property was platted as part of Marsh Glen which was recorded on November 8, 2000. The house was built in 2001. The 60’x40’ sport court was not shown on the plans for the building permit application. The subject property is located in the Single Family Residential (RSF) district and has an area of 20,595 square feet. In the RSF district 25% is the maximum permitted impervious surface coverage for a lot. The applicant has a hard cover of 32.11%, is proposing to remove 539 square feet (2.62%) of hard Rear cover, and is requesting a 4.5% hard cover Property variance. The applicant is also requesting Line a 5-foot side yard setback variance for the sport court. The hard cover issue came to the attention of the City in the spring of 2005 with an anonymous phone call from a resident inquiring about construction of the sport court close to the applicants’ property line. Upon inspection of the property, it was clear that various portions of the improvements were on, or extended across property lines onto neighboring property. It also appeared the lot could be over on the maximum hard cover percentage. When it was clear the sport court did not meet required setbacks, the applicant was informed that the property would have to be brought into compliance with City Code or a variance would be need to be applied for. After meeting with staff to discuss the issues surrounding the sport court, the applicant decided to have an as- built survey completed on their property. The as- built survey revealed the existing hard cover was 32.11%. Variance West requests for relief from Side hard cover and setback Property restrictions were applied Line for on September 16, 2005. Hurt Variance Planning Case #05-32 October 18, 2005 Page 5 ANALYSIS The site is zoned Residential Single Family (RSF). The applicant has completed construction of the sport court in question. Chanhassen City Code does not require building permits for sport courts. However, such structures do require a zoning compliance review. The City uses zoning compliance reviews to ensure that structures, which do not require a building permit, still comply with zoning ordinances. Criteria of a zoning compliance review include setbacks, hard surface coverage and structure height. The applicant has proposed the removal of the concrete slab (120 sq ft), the area of the sport court lying within the 10-foot drainage & utility easement on the south edge of the property (300 sq ft), those portions of retaining wall located within drainage and utility easements surrounding the sport court (119 sq ft) and that portion of retaining wall extending 9 feet across the southern property line onto Mission Hills Garden Homes Homeowners Association property. Existing Hard Cover Calculations: Lot Area = 20,595 sq. ft. House = 1,968 sq. ft. Driveway = 1,473 sq. ft. Walk, Stoop, Porch = 242 sq. ft. Patio = 93 sq. ft. *Retaining Walls = 281 sq. ft. *Concrete Slab = 120 sq. ft. *Sport Court = 2,437 sq. ft. TOTAL = 6,614 sq. ft. 32.11% * Portions of indicated items proposed to be removed. Proposed Hard Cover Calculation: House = 1,968 sq. ft. Driveway = 1,473 sq. ft. Walk, Stoop, Porch = 242 sq. ft. Patio = 93 sq. ft. Retaining Walls = 162 sq. ft. Concrete Slab = 0 sq. ft. Sport Court = 2,137 sq. ft. TOTAL = 6,075 sq. ft. 29.5% The applicant would have to remove 5 feet by the entire length of the west side of the court to comply with the 10-foot side yard setback while removing 926.25 square feet from the sport court in order to bring the hard cover to 25%. The applicant could maintain a 1,210.75 square-foot sport court (approximately 40’x30’); this would allow the applicant to continue to enjoy their backyard while complying with ordinance requirements. The area of a basketball court inside the three-point arc is approximately 628 square feet. The applicant could maintain a sport court nearly twice this size and still comply with ordinance. Another option for removal of hard cover would be reduction of driveway area. Hurt Variance Planning Case #05-32 October 18, 2005 Page 6 The post-construction runoff pattern appears to be consistent with the drainage pattern that existed before the sport court was constructed. Drainage flows to the existing pond southwest of the Hurt residence within the Mission Hills townhome development. Based on the Mission Hills storm water design calculations, this pond can accommodate the additional runoff from the impervious area for which the Hurts are requesting a variance. However, staff is concerned that, should the Hurt variance request be granted, future requests for a variance within this drainage area may be requested and granted based on precedence. Should future variances be granted, the capacity of the pond may be exceeded; therefore, staff recommends that the hard cover variance request be denied. While the applicant has expended money for the improvements, such expenditure does not justify the granting of a variance. Approval of a variance is contingent upon proof that the literal enforcement of the Chanhassen City Code would cause an undue hardship. Not having a reasonable use of the property would constitute an undue hardship. Reasonable use is defined as the use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet. Reasonable use of this property, a single-family home with a two- car garage, already exists. Any use of the property beyond that discussed above is strictly ancillary to the principal use. Based on these facts, staff must recommend denial of this request. FINDINGS The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre- existing standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria. Finding: The literal enforcement of this chapter does not cause an undue hardship. By having a single-family home and a two-car garage the property owner has reasonable use of the property. Additionally, the applicant could maintain a smaller sport court. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties that lie within the Single Family Residential District. c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The improvements increase the value of the property. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Hurt Variance Planning Case #05-32 October 18, 2005 Page 7 Finding: Construction of the sport court was completed before a zoning compliance review was performed; therefore, this is a self-created hardship. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of a variance may be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located due to the increase in runoff from this property. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets. RECOMMENDATION Staffrecommends that the Planning Commissionadopt the following motion: “The Planning Commission denies Variance #05-32 for a 4.5% hard surface coverage variance from the maximum 25% hard surface coverage restriction and a 5-foot side yard setback variance for the addition of a sport court on a lot zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) based upon the findings in the staff report and the following: 1.The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship. 2.The property owner has reasonable use of the property. The Planning Commission orders the property owner to: 1.Remove sufficient impervious surface to comply with ordinance requirements.” ATTACHMENTS 1.Findings of Fact. 2.Development Review Application. 3.Letter and Variance description from Clint & Jennifer Hurt stamped “Received September 16, 2005”. 4.Letter from Mission Hills Garden Homes Homeowners Association stamped “Received September 20, 2005”. 5.Numerous letters from various Chanhassen residents in support of Hurt Variance. 6.Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing List. 7.As-Built Survey. g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-32 hurt variance\staff report.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND ACTION IN RE: Application of Clint & Jennifer Hurt for 4.5% hard surface coverage variance from the maximum 25% hard surface coverage restriction and a 5-foot side yard setback variance for the addition of a sport court – Planning Case No. 05-32. On October 18, 2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the Application of Clint & Jennifer Hurt for 4.5% hard surface coverage variance from the maximum 25% hard surface coverage restriction and a 5-foot side yard setback variance for the addition of a sport court on property located in the Single Family Residential District at 8491 Mission Hills Circle. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance that was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1.The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential (RSF). 2.The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential – Low Density (Net Density Range 1.2 – 4u/Acre). 3.The legal description of the property is: Lot 6, Block 2, Marsh Glen. 4.The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a.Literal enforcement of this chapter would not cause undue hardship. b.The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable, generally, to other properties in the Single Family Residential district. c.The improvements increase the value of the property. d.The alleged difficulty or hardship is a self-created hardship. e.The granting of the variance may be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located. f.The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger 1 of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 5.The planning report #05-32 Variance dated October 18, 2005, prepared by Josh Metzer, et al, is incorporated herein. ACTION The Planning Commission denies the Variances from the impervious surface and side yard setback restrictions for the addition of a sport court. th ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on this 18 day of October, 2005. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: ___________________________________ Its Chairman g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-32 hurt variance\findings of fact.doc 2 Planning Case No. 6S - 3~ CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION RECEIVED SEP. 1 6 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLEASE PRINT Applicant Name and Address: --LU.n:t- at-.JeY) VI; -Fe r --t:h.u-t -Men MISS ion -tfi 11.5 r J rd~ l J\aVlhO~Sf--tf\ M,~) 55?:> II Contact: .Jc -!f' VI \ --k..-r Phone:~ Fax: Email: _bo:cnux--t@-fJe-Vd' V)~-t: Owner Name and Address: ~<-- OS Contact ~ Ca.rn-- J vr-€b Phone: ax: Email: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit 'X.. Variance Non-conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign** - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit Site Plan Review* X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost*** - $50 CUP/SPRNACNARIWAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ doG ~ Subdivision* An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. * Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an aw' x 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a diaital COpy in TIFF-Group 4 (*.tif) format. ** Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. *** Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TOTAL ACREAGE: WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: See, ctJtached This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ~ Signature of Applicant ... Q-/S-V5 Date q-/5-D5 Date G:\plan\forms\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/05 Dear Planning Commissioners, REceIVED Sfp 1 6 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN September 16, 2005 We are applying for a side setback and hard surface cover variance from the City of Chanhassen. We'd like to share with you reasons why you should consider recommending our variance to the City Council. On June 10, 2005, a letter arrived in the mail from Josh Metzer, stating that "your property is in violation of Chanhassen City Code." We were devastated. When we built our sport court in May of 2005, we certainly did not intend for it to be as big a deal as it has become. We are fully aware that our contractor did not consult with the city before it was built, and we are taking responsibility for that as well. There is nothing we can do about that, other than to apologize to you. We are just average homeowners, so we weren't aware of what needed to be done to build a sport court. That is why we hired a licensed contractor to do the job. He assured us that he would take care of the permits and whatever else needed to be done to build the sport court of our dreams. When we received Josh's letter, we immediately phoned our contractor and had him stop working on the sport court. Unfortunately, at that point, it was almost completed. We realize our retaining walls are abundant and will gladly take them out. That is the least of our problems. But it hurts us that the sport court will have to be cut off. Not only will it be a financial burden, but we LOVE our court. We had enough room on the court to put a short court tennis court, along with a half court basketball court. The purpose of installing this sport court was not to increase the value of our land. Rather, we thought it would be a great way for us, our neighbors, children, and friends to have a safe place to play, close to home. The closest park to our house is approximately a mile away, via walking trail. Another park that we frequently visit requires us to cross Highway 101, which, in the future, is going to be made into a four-lane highway. We thought that if we could provide a safe place for our children and our neighbors' children to play, we would be doing a great service to our neighborhood. In addition, our neighbors believe our sport court to be an asset to the neighborhood. We have included several letters from neighbors as well, all in support of our variance. When we moved to Chanhassen two years ago, we planned to stay here forever. We want to raise our children in this house and have them attend public schools, so our intention was to make our home a great place to live forever. We are not intransigent people, and that is why we are asking you to see that we ARE taking measures to try and comply, but we are also asking for you to grant us a variance in order for us to keep the remainder of our sport court. What we'd like to do is ask that you come out to see the court. We don't want you to come to the commission meeting in October and not have seen it in person. We want you to understand our point of view as well and not just the City Planner's point of view. Please consider this request, and being objective to our situation. Thank you for your time. SinCereIY,~. / .... /// --- C/l-H.c . ~ ~rHurt 8491 Mission Hills Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-974-8349 Description of Variance Request An "as-built" survey was completed on July 18, 2005. Attached you will find a copy of this survey. The retaining walls need to be removed in order to comply with city code. We will remove the wall on the entire west side of the sport court (75.5 sq. feet), the entire south end of the court (33.5 sq. feet), and the 19.5 sq. feet that are in the city easement on the southeastern corner of the sport court. In addition, we will remove 8 feet off the south side of the sport court (320 sq. feet) and the concrete slab (120 sq. feet) on the east side of our property. With these removals, our total hard surface coverage will be 6055.5 sq. feet. That brings our total hard surface coverage down to 29.4%. However, this amount still exceeds the Single Family Residential District's maximum hard surface coverage of 25%. Therefore, we are asking for a variance of 4.4% hard surface coverage. In addition, to avoid cutting any more off of our sport court, we are asking for a variance for a five-foot setback on the west side of our property. Please consider our variance with understanding. RECEIVED SE~ 1 6 2005 CIT'fOF CHANHASSEN Justification of How Request Complies with the Findings for Granting a Variance a. We do not consider this variance an undue hardship. b. We did not intend for our property to be in violation of city code and we are trying to make things work. That is why we are applying for a variance for single family residential zoning. We also realize that there hasn't been any history of variances for sport courts. c. We did not intend for this sport court to increase the value of our home. Rather, we thought it would be a great way for us, our neighbors, kids, and friends to have a safe place to play, close to home. d. This hardship is not a self-created one. Our builder didn't check into the city for a zoning compliance review. We gave that responsibility to our builder, and he let us down. e. We don't believe that this variance will affect other neighbors and have included several letters from neighbors in support of our variance. f. There will not be any inadequate air or light supply from our sport court, no increase in congestion of public streets, and no increase in the danger of fire or endangerment of public safety. In addition, this variance will not diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. All of the neighbors we've talked to are in support of our variance. RECEIVED SE~ 1 6 2005 CITV OF CHANHASSE~' September 19,2005 Mr. Josh Metzer Planning Department City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. Metzer: It has come to the attention of the Mission Hills Garden Homes Board of Directors that the property owner's recreational improvement at 8491 Mission Hills Circle, Chanhassen MN is in violation of city codes. The Board is also aware that the owner of that property has been canvassing the residents of Mission Hills Garden Homes for petition signatures to gain support for allowing a variance to the city codes. The Mission Hills Garden Homes Board of Directors wishes to make it a matter of record with the Chanhassen Planning Department that the property bordering the improvements at 8491 Mission Hills Circle borders on property owned by the Mission Hills Garden Homes Association. While the border in question is closest to addresses 520 and 528 Mission Hills Drive, it is the Boards position that any requests for variance should be addressed to the Mission Hills Garden Homes Association and not the individual residents. It is also the position of the Mission Hills Garden Homes Board of Directors that the City of Chanhassen not allow the property owner at 8491 Mission Hills Circle a variance to city code due to the overall impact on properties of Mission Hills Garden Homes. Mission Hills Garden Homes, Board of Directors / ,/ ~-/. - ." / .~ /~',,// , ~ L~~~oI! iPs: September 15, 2005 RECEIVED SE:P 1 6 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Building Commissioner City of Chanhassen Dear Sir or Madam: My husband and I live at 461 Mission Hills Court, here in Chanhassen. I am taking the time to write a letter in support of a variance of a 5' setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage for the sport court in the yard our next door neighbors, Clint and Jennifer Hurt. Seeing as their yard directly abuts our yard, we are two of the most affected by their landscaping choice and we have absolutely no problem with the size or design of the sport court. It should also be noted that the property in question is quite secluded and only two neighbors' views are directly even affected by what is in no means an eyesore. At one time, some ofthe home owners approached our builder to see ifhe could reserve a small plot of land or even sell a small lot to all of us so that we could have a playground for all the children in the neighborhood to play on. However, in his interest to make as much money as possible, he squeezed houses onto even the smallest lots he could. One of the sport court's main uses is to serve as a tennis court for those children and without a variance, it will no longer be anywhere near large enough for them to play. My husband and I would find it much more intrusive to have such a large section of the sport court tom back out. It is a blessing to have that yard finally landscaped, after the previous owner left it completely untended and had not even bothered to sod the back yard the entire time she lived at the address. (I've often wondered why the city did not get involved then!) It wasn't until Clint and Jennifer Hurt moved in that the huge mass of weeds in the back yard invading our lawn was finally dealt with, much to our relief. I truly appreciate your time and consideration towards this matter. I should think that the City could spend it's time on much more disturbing issues than one that the affected neighborhood has little or no problem with. Thank you once again. Sincerely, d~ vt()G(\l{}J Lea N ordos Building Commissioner RE: Letter of support for Clint and Jemrlfer Hurtts variance To whom it may concern: On behalf of Clint and Jennifer Hurt, please accept this letter of support concerning their sport court variance for a five foot side setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage area. We live two houses down trom the Hurtts residence and were one of the first residents to move into the Mission Hills development. We have seen our neighborhood develop trom the onset and strongly feel the addition of the Hurtts sport court is an asset to our community. The court has provided a much needed safe haven for our children to play on a daily basis. In addition, our neighborhood has held numerous social and recreational gatherings on the Hurtts court and hope to do so in the future. Our only option in years past was to hold these events in the street. The court is unobtrusive, blends in well with the environment, and has contributed to the property values of our neighborhood. We strongly support the addition of the Hurtts sport court and accordingly request that the Building Commission grant the applicable variance for a fiVe foot setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage. Dan' Eastman and Leanne Eastman Dan and Leanne Eastman 8451 Mission Hills Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-380-0245 September 12, 2005 RECEIVED SE~ 1 6 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Building Commissioner 7700 Market Boulevard City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN 55317 To Whom It May Concern, This letter is in response to Clint & Jennifer Hurt's sport court variance. We are John & Mary Gerogeorge and our address is 470 Mission Hills Court. Our back yard property and the Hurt's back yard are adjacent to each other. Jennifer and Clint Hurt approached us early on and asked if we had an issue about them putting in a sport court. We had no objections to them installing the sport court. Since the sport court has been in, there has been no problems. As a matter of fact, it brings some of the neighborhood families together for some family fun of tennis or basketball. Our opinion would be that we support the variance of the sport court. If you have any questions, please feel free to call us at (952) 934- 7011. Thank you, RECEIVED SE~ 1 6 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN September li\ 2005 Dear Building Commissioner: I am writing in support of Clint and Jennifer Hurt's request for a variance of a five foot side setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage. Since Clint and Jennifer installed their sport court, it has become a real asset for the Mission Hills Lane neighborhood. It is continually being used by the neighborhood kids and adults alike. It also has served as an excellent and safe play area and has filled a void that existed due to the lack of a nearby park. We humbly ask that you consider granting this variance and take into account the benefit that it provides for this neighborhood. Sincerely, ~j:~ ~;;:;j~ Scott and Micheh~ T~rQ9lg / 8455 Mission Hills Lane Chanhassen MN 55317 952-906-1046 Dan and Jane Zureich 8490 Mission Hills Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 September 15,2005 REceiVED SE~ 1 6 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Building Commissioner City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: 8491 Mission Hills Circle Request for Variance To Whom It May Concern: Our property borders to the East that of Jennifer and Clint Hurt (8491 Mission Hills Circle). Our family has used their sport court, which is the subject of their request for variance. We understand that the rock wall erected by the Hurts is currently situated on our shared property line and that the sport court is currently five feet from that line, as opposed to the ten feet required by the City of Chanhassen. It is our further understanding that if the Hurt's request for variance is granted, this rock wall will be removed and that the area on the east side of the sport court will be re-graded and re-sodded. Weare writing this letter to inform you that based on our understanding of the above, we support Jennifer and Clint Hurt's variance request for a five-foot side setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage. We take comfort in knowing that our children have someplace safe and close to play, and do not have to worry about them playing in or crossing streets or venturing far from home to play at a park. The sport court is especially timely since we understand that in the near future Mission Hills Lane will be opened to Highway 101, which is being widened into a four lane road. If you have any questions, please contact us at 952-914-0879. ffl"lcer. el y'. r );#11)4JA&{;J ~.~ () Dan and Jane Zureich September 10, 2005 Subject: RECEIVED SEP 1 6 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN I am a neighbor to the Hurt's. I live at 8460 Mission Hills Circle, Chanhassen. City of Chanhassen Building Commissioner To: Clint and Jennifer Hurt's Sports Court I fully support the Hurt's Sport Court. It is as built as professional as something to be found in a local park. Furthermore, I have had the opportunity to use it and it will cause fewer injuries to children and adults than a concrete court. You should also be reminded that we do not have a public facility similar to the Hurt's in close proximity to our neighborhood. Therefore, I recommend you approve the five-foot side setback and a 29.40/0 hard surface coverage. As they said in the original movie; "Bad News Bears 11" let the children play! I can be contacted during the daytime at 952-932-4101. REceiVED SEp\ 1 6 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN September 14, 2005 Building Commissioner Re: Clint & Jennifer Hurt's Sport Court Dear Sir/Madam: Weare writing to you today in an effort to communicate to you that we support Clint and Jennifer Hurt's variance of a five foot setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage. Our home is located just off the back of the Hurt's backyard and have been given the opportunity to play on and make use of their sport court. We currently do not have a neighborhood park and find this sport court to be an asset to our neighborhood and a privilege for our two children to have access to. Please take the time to consider this and allow the Hurt's to keep their sport court at its current size, I believe if it is eliminated or reduced in size it will no longer have the same benefit as it was originally intended for. Thank-you! Kelly, Dan, Cayman & Jordan Fasching 8550 Mission Hills Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-937-1229 REceiVED SEP 1 6 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN September 15, 2005 To the Chanhassen Building Commissioner: Re: Sport Court Variance. Clint and Jennifer Hurt As residents of 8444 Mission Hills Lane, we are in support of Clint and Jennifer Hurt's variance of a five-foot side setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage. The Hurt's sport court has been a gathering place for BBQ's and other neighborhood events due to the fact they have the space as well as the sport court for recreation for the children as well as the adults. As a neighborhood we have had basketball games and anticipate having the Hurt's host hockey games for the neighborhood in the winter months. It should be noted that there is not a similar facility/recreation space in the immediate vicinity. It would be a determent to the neighborhood should this sport court be altered or removed. Again, our full support is behind this variance application. Sincerely, /~~ \; fw".~ Kim & Conrade Thomas 8444 Mission Hills Lane (952) 937-7551 (Neighbors of Clint and Jennifer Hurt) September 12,2005 RECEIVED SEP 1 6 2005 CITVOF CHANHASSEN Building Commissioner, This letter is in support of Clint and Jennifer Hurt's variance of a five foot side setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage of their sport court. We live directly next door to the Hurt's residence at 8481 Mission Hills Circle. With over 65 kids in this relatively small neighborhood and no park nearby, this sport court is a huge asset. We always know were our kids are and with our children in many City of Chanhassen sports, this is a nice and close practice ground. An approval of the Hurt's variance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you so much for your time. Sincerely, /-1 J~~4~g~~ Dale and Rhonda Tirevold September 14, 2005 REceIVED SEp 1 62005 CITYOF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen Building Commissioner, We are neighbors ofCHnt and Jennifer and are familiar with the variance discussion regarding their sport court. We have used the sport court and enjoy having it in our neighborhood. We are also in favor of them maintaining a variance of a five foot side setback and a 29.4% hard surface coverage. Please reconsider their plea and the support they have from the neighborhood to maintain a healthy outdoor-living environment. / Sincerely, t' \ ~fL~ ;,} _I I . i, y-' /'-;f1i/ft4-/1~/J- t ' ifer ike Hidding 5 Mission Hills Lane september 11, 2005 REceiVED SE~ 1 6 2005 CITY-OF CHANHASSEN Dear Building commissioner, we live at 8471 Mission Hills circle (2 houses from clint & Jennifer Hurt). We are in support of Clint and Jennifer Hurt's variance of a five foot side setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage. please consider this request at the upcoming planning commission Meeting. Thank you, ~~ caroline and John Herbeck September 10, 2005 RECEIVED SfP 1 6 2005 CITY 01= CHANHASSEN To: The Building Commissioner ofChanhassen City Council Clint and Jennifer Hurt are in our Mission Hills Lane Development. We would like you to know we are in support of their variance of a five food side setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage. Thank you, ) /l--I-- /U:..d9~~~ Patrick and Lee Anne Eastman 8425 Mission Hills Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 ~e~- Date: 9/15/06 REceIVED SfP 1 6 2005 CITVOF CHANHASSEN To: City of Chanhassen MN From: Michael Maule 8464 Mission Hills Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Sport Court/ Clint and Jennifer HurtlMission Hills Lane This memo is to inform the City of Chanhassen, MN that we (Micheal Maule and spouse Patricia Silva) are in support of Clint and Jennifer Hurt's variance of a five foot setback and 29.4% hard surface coverage. If you have any questions regarding this matter, you can reach us at 952 294 4545. Sincerely, Mi~AI Patricia Silva r;-;;~ ({ /~0~ z w en en <C :c z <C :c c...:> ~. ~ C/) ~ c...:> QL!'? W g > C"J _ e.t:l w~ (.) w a: . Cl) u e CO 'C CO > ~(J) -e ::J J: 1- ~ e e Cl) ~ "'0 e CO .I-J e .- U \.I- o .I-J 1- o 0. 0. ::J (J) e Cl) 1- CO Cl) $ ~ Cl) ..c .I-J ..c ~ ~ >- .l-Jo. ffi E, E 8 Cl) 0 (J) .I-J CO.I-J Cl) 1- ~~ '0 U .I-J.I-J o 0 J2o. I (J) 01- M 'Cl) Cl)..c ..c.I-J .I-J \.l- e 0 .- Cl) :5"'0 .~ 'Vi (J)..c _ .I-J - ::J ~ g cnCl) e..c . _ .I-J . e \.I- co 0 :=.l-Jtt:: ~ ~ 0 (J)..c.I-J -e.I-JCI) ::J~~.I-J J: (J) e Cl) Cl) ~ Cl) ..c1-coE .I-J:p::JCI) .I-J e 0" (J) co Cl) (J) co :5 Cl) 0 Cl) , "'0 ..c N },~ e .I-J M .- Cl) Cl) u 19> .I-J (J)o~o cuEEJ2 "'OCl)Cl)I e 0::: 0:::0 ::J M Cl) · · $ -() ..~ ~ -;-J ~ .-- C)) ! - j~ ~ "- I 'f) , \" ~ I " ~~'~~:f.~ w ~~.,j ri' ~ \J';- ~I". \:::::. '- G NI \"" ~ ~. <:) G'- ~<S ~ Q) ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~O'- 0-: ~ i j l~ ~ D>.:- ~ ~ .JJ~ '1Jl ,<.~ ~ !?, ~ R~ ~~ ~ -3 ~ -'" ~ of. f "- ---z s~ .~ ,~ ~ c .~ ~ ~.~ '" ,5 I ~Y' 'C\Vl '\\r'} ~ ,<>~ ~ \f) ~ :J? ,~~~<S ~ Vl .z: lJ) s- c6 ~ Q)Vl n L>o /\. S s- .'" L.. -.u '0 ~:S- - " ....."0<( 7: L~ \'C) ~ ~ ~ ~ '-J V) - \,.0 'i"'. ~ \0 iJ\ \n Ui/'~ -.o'.~ ~ ~ --Q ~,,~~ ~ ~ 21 N""\ """,," ~~ "- ~ ~ ra ~ ~ <S'"" -" ~ 0- o '-...:... ~ ~ O-~C J r .~ ~ P.t) ~ 'J ~ t CY~~ ~ irJ ~{i3~ ~fB. ~.~ $,j l ~ & n~ '- ~(j _;>."" " -; ~ c.,~J \ _.~ ~'\. ....::.t- .--J ":;j i{j ~ "" \.() " ~ ~ . . . I RECEIVED SE? 1 6 2005 D /3 " { . CITY OF CHANHASSEN ~(Itf/ . lAI / d LI:9 ,0 rnn1f"S510Y7ev/ 1-10-05 We tll v~ ~1 v V G~!J Ul/l. --to tfLf~prvo V6 fh.t- V /tV{~Y7C -e..fu V C I/t II nf-~t1) h 100 v5 (!f / hf . Itht1 Jcllr7lftv -/f-vll/r. W{ I/~ t?lf 4//0 fl/JI52f7il'vJ !-hIls COfAvt I~ {Wtf,h~u;seVJ ttn -lhe &l.tl-c/{e-:::v/c t{,t;o ve:.. tiCVlti( ~ sf of -fhe/ -fhfiv+ Yr-e5ilt:/et/7Ge" ,Wt S(A.;ppovi -rh<- -HiAvfj V#vV/t1(VlCe ibv ~ f7v-e foo+ Sia-( Se.fbaCK c{nd 2,~ vlo havd ,su,v p/l C~ {o v {,V f'lg~. JIV-t ha f/e -eKpei/iCt/l(('d : h 0 n~~PLh'v-e.- I vYl J:>~c--j- (voYn +~ sp~v~f- COlA vt Ano( se-t /1 (7M 'J a 5 a posr/1 ve, ac;sc f ,---t-b -f'h-c, V7e.''!Jh bo(/' h Dod. 1+ pvv vrcles (){ ,5at.e ana fu V7 place.. 'fov- -f1-K., VY1tf['y [Chi lav.(n, In -ft~ AV~t1'-to PI?/" 51nCG l+h-ev-c, J5n+ t1 ,PiA.l 1?AI/~ h:a.Vty. Ir #1./5D IprO Vld-es t1 p/?tce ivy' j7t-m( II ec; .fD 3/~-fh-ev ,tIt/V) c1 e-tjO<j -fh-ewl Sc , V~ 5 . . Theft VI k- youfvv jOUV COYlSid-cYPL-h'6h. [a:,;1/t~~ ~ ~d~--... f2D b-c vt t7t h tit L f~ Get (A V f V\ ~O (v'li~ifO'n }h'H ~ CoVlvt L~V1~~ (P1Z;2)QO&-Vl4og . 9- /S~()5 ~1 I <. fke.. ~ i i ""\ .~ I i \ VC0\ {~ J Ok ~cfl ~~ if D......~. rl:'~\I!r.~ n,,~uik,B. ~u SEP 2 2005 t RECEIVED SEP 3, 2 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN City of Chanhassen Attn Building Commissioner: Scott and Shannon Fiedler 8511 Mission Hills Lane Chanhassen MN 55317 952-975-9802 We live in the upper cul-de-sac of the neighborhood. Our children play back and forth at each others houses. When the Hurt family decided to put the sport court in their backyard, they were very kind to invite their neighborhood friends to use the sport court at the Hurt home with parent supervision. We are very much in support of Clint and Jennifer Hurt's variance of a five foot side setback and 29-4% hard surface coverage. The sport court of the Clint and Jennifer Hurt Family does not have a negative impact on the city in any way. If the neighbors of Mission Hills Lane are in support of Clint and Jennifer, then pass the variance and move on to more important issues that the city should be focused on. Best regards, Scott and Shannon Fiedler CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-32 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 18, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Variances after-the-fact hard surface coverage and side yard setback for a sport court located at 8491 Mission Hills Circle. Applicant: Clint & Jennifer Hurt. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Josh Metzer, Planner I Email: jmetzer@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1132 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on October 6, 2005) CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDA VIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on October 6, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for the Clint & Jennifer Hurt Variance Request - Planning Case 05-32 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this~ day oft'JL4e.~ r ,2005. ~ 1)K..,:I.4Y1iH' ~<l<l'~ J Notary~ \ o11",~r1J.:~ K\M t. MEUW\SSEN i .' . 'f~ r Minnesota Notarx Pub"'~p~res Jan 31,2010 Wr-J CommISSIon <J' 0) C +:i Q) Q) :!5 0)5 c.- .- U) J..U) as._ Q) E :l:e o ._ 0 :co ~O) c.c .... .- o c Q) c 0.!2 +:ic. o c ZQ) U) U) as s::. c as s::. o 0) c: +:i Q) Q) :!5 c 0)0 c.- ._ U) J.. U) as.- Q) E :l:E .2 0 :cO ~O) c.c .- ....c o c: Q) as 0- ._ c. - o c zQ) U) U) as s::. c: as s::. o "0 ..... ro >- Q) "0 '00 "0 C ro -o~ > ro al(i) - > Q) 0 E -= U ci ro Q) o~alt::: oo't::J ., 0 :J 0 """"""(/)U (tj""""Ot::: lC) ctl (ij 8- 0(i)L:(/) O.coro C\lEro ~..."'" 0 oowd,..... _ T""L:L:1Il ..... .....O+;Q) :J Q) ._ ..... CJ :c :8 g ~ la ......Q)....._ U :J ro.- C 00........ _0.E~ ~ ~ctiti~ ...., "O:c~alC\l06 ~ ~ o-.c C? C :J~Q)Q)lC)= I-oa:(/)OO Q) E j:: g ~~ s 5 CCU 0 ..J "i III o c.. o ... D. "0 ..... m >- Q) "0 '00 "0 C m -o~ > ro al(i) - > Q) 0 E -= U cimQ) ~alt::: 80't::J f'-.R~8 (tj""""Et::: lC)ctlm8- 0(i)L:(/) O.com C\lEm..... -m"lO OOL:Q)..... T""0L:1Il '- ~ (1) Q) ..... CJ .co '13 2 I: o 5 ro .S! 00........ _O.E~ ~ctiti~ -g:c~alC\l Q) .~ o-.c C? C :J~Q)Q)lC)= 1-0 a: (/)00 Q) E .. j::1: ~~ S 5 cu 0 C..J "i III o c.. o ... D. Q) -g Q) L:O:S -L:"O -.....m g,g~ .cL:- m 0>= :J'(j) 3: o c.=: >-Q)m GiE:SB S.EEQ)cn o ,!: e:s 0. CUI 0::: ~2 -:J c'(/) S(/)o..- 0) -0 .~.5 Q) c C Q)'- Gl 'C'!: E 3: ~m$Q)g GlQ).cL:O UlL:O-..... Q) as .2 0 0) ~ 13 ~ :0 ; 'E - _...:JC:JL: .- Gl 0. moO) 0:5(/)_ :J !!l C .- (/) ,0 o:SQ)O.c :c ,!!! ..... :J Q) - C C. 0 arc 0) o III Q) ..... ..... C .-(/) E (/) o.'c o.(/) (/) m .!!? C 0. c'- Q) ::2:.2 :; ro :S L: ...- '5 a..g S .Q O)oQ)"O..o:O "",-L:o..c:J OO<l:l-mmo. J!! U:.;..: gla~g 'c .~ Q) ~ I: ii. c.. cu .!!!4 e g D.<(D...J ai l.l :;:; o C UI :E ... - o Gl "C 'jjj Gl UI ... Q)Gl C3~ ........ t::: O~ i !!l-;; o .....Q) :c ,!!! :!::: C C. COlli C (/) E ~.!!? C 06~:8 T""1lI O)l.l "",.2 00<1: .!! u: .. ~'E >1: I:m1:0 .- CJ Q)'- 2 g'- c..-; cu 0 CJ _ ... 0 D.<CD...J Q) '8 Q) L:O:S -L:"O -.....m g.8~ .cL:- ro 0>= :J'(j) 3: o c.=: >-Q)m E:ScS ~E<D(ti .!: e:s 0. 0::: ...;..2 - :J c'(/) .!!? 0. +:: 0) o>.!: Q) C 'E.!: ~':1: ro$Q)g Q).cL:0 L:O_"'" .g 0 0> ~ :0 ; .!: - :Jc:;L: c..mo 0) (/)_ :J .- (/) ,0 :SQ)O.c '+-:::1(1)...... o 0-'0' 0> Q) ~ ..... C (/) o.'c o.(/) (/) m e-ci:~ :Jro- o.u-u Q)'8-g~ L: o..c :J I-roroo. I '5~-E ~ g- 00 ~ ti ~C\I-g Q) E .:. ....: :J Q) _Q)C"')(/) :gSQ)~' U U (/) ,cT""OQ)>'_.s::.- Q) (/) roEO";"'-L:OIll-t) .0'....: '0 ~ ci. Q) """ Q) - o..:E ~ Q) ..... u C 0.0 E ~ ~ .8 = - I: E 0. .~ 0 -...... 0 I ---'-'" .- "0 0 .- 0) ....~ (/) C\I ~ c: 3: O:C I: Q)......~ C""'olC)UO""'-Q)O (/)0 Q)o.,g 'E- ii5 0 - 0) :J U ro 1: 3: 'iij Q)-~_ Q)-0-1Il g-:s -g E E E' cti m g, C en c.."! ,- o .-..........0 Q)....E ..... C 0.0 Q) ro 0 Q) - ' ... r::: E 0. 0 Q) L: _ N Q) O>:t: ' Q) (/) L: Q) - 0 L: Q) en ~.!: cu 0 0 :S c-:S Q)e::! (/)OO:::::J ~-Q)-IIl"":O ..... ~ E"O 0 00 ':1:":: C ...... Q) CO ~ Oc..oc ..... - L:EoEQ)ol: 3:-c~m Q)~:J~':: .s::~.- .c:JO c:JQ)I-......1: .92 Q)"O"O (/) 0 >-...., Q)"'" L: ~ I: ~ (/) Q) Q) CL::!::O (/).Q-- '= cu ~ ~'$ ~ ~ Q) ,$ ~ ~ '0 5 .s:: c: o = ~ U .g ~ C L: (/) Q)'OO - Q) C ._ ..... (/) Q) :::: "0 0 C .- U (/) CU.s:: m 3: Q)'- :S 0 'C U ~ ~ ~'E Q) - Q)_.....O) Q)~LL.~uctl>E.5g > S ro.!: Q) .;- L: m'~ -c -g 0 -;: ... "5> u J!l Ca ti (J) ::; C> ~ ~ Q) \\1 0 0 0 - '8- C Q) Q) .8"0 g 0. ~ E.!: Q) Q) 'S: = 0. Q) L: '0 _ = ..... ~ Q) E - L: - .... 3:mEU=cmL:UNoc-.c~ 1a Q) E ~ u ~:c ;'.92. Q) U ~ .8 ~ cu _L:o:JQ)>>-moEc cu"O en I- 0 a..:S :J O~ "0 0...= Q) ~ ~ > ~ o C (/) = :::: 0.'0. cu :s >- >- 0._ m 'C Q) 0 Q) .s:: :!::.c~:SE3:"Ou.c1- 'i ,....:C\ic<:i-.:i III 0) I: I: Q).- c..t) c..Q) ~== -Q) cu.s:: .s::- :=-; ~.. 1IlJ!! I: I: o Q) ~E ~E :s 0 00 I -Q)- 0. :J.....E (/) 0 00 ~ ti ~C\I-g Q) E .:. (/) Q) Q)C"')(/) "OQ)Q)~' ....: :J (/) E~ C T"" 0 Q) 'S; :t:: :5 .5 U U m 0";"'-L:01ll - Q) :B ~ ci. Q) """ Q) - o..:E ~ m 'e ti C c.. 0 E ~ ~ .8 = - I: E 0. .~ 0 cii C"') 0 I 0 >.'S: 0'" := "0 0'- .. (/) C\I .t:: 0. > .c I: Q)..... (/) C""'OlC)UO""'-Q)0 (/) 0. cS .!!? ~ 0 - 0) U ro 1: 3: 'iij oQ)=E Q)-~_:JQ)-O_1Il g-:s-g E E~]j ~~5en g.~'E .....co.o Q)mOQ)- ...."""E c.. 0 Q) 0 L: - N Q) O):t: ' Q) (/) L: Q) - 0 L: Q) en ~.!: cu 0 0 L: C - L: .....0Q) ~ .~ ~ c=! L: ~ "Ui ;i 0 ::::~E~ >L: 0 Q)o~ Oo.oc Q)ctl:J(/)E-E.s::C'\I1: 3:c~ m .c:;!2~ c'S Q)I-=:::'c Q)Q)"O""" (/)0'--' Q).....L: ;';;1: .- .... C L: :!:: 0 (/).Q- - ,~CU i::(/)~Q) ro ro(/)Q)""'c_- Q) Q) ._ (/) _ Q) . _ m L: 0 0 .s:: D. > 0.. Q) ..Q o..g >. C L: (/) Q)'OO - Q) o = ~ U Q) :::: {g 0 C ,- U (/) cu .s:: ~':1: .....Q).!!? :S O'C U ~~ ~'E Q)- Q) _ ..... 0> Q) ~LL. ~ ~ J1-6 E ~ g > ~ m.!: ~'cL: m'13 C mOl:'" '0, U .s (ij ....: :J g> - @) Q) coo .9 _ = C Q) ~ .8"0 0 0...... E .- Q) Q) ~ ~ 8: EQ) L: '0' c '<<S .c tf ~ E c :S :c ~ ro .g == m:C - Q) - 0 Q) 0 cu cu :::: Q) E:o ..... 3: >"0' Q) U E - := "0 mL:o:JQ) ~m.....Ect:::(/)culll U5 I- 0 a..:S :J 0'- "0 0.::: 2 m .92 > ... o C (/).- _ 0. 0. cu :s >. >. 0 .- m'c Q) 0 Q).s:: :!::.c~:SE3:"Ou.c1- 'i T""C\ic<:i-.:i III 0) I: I: Q).- 0..- c..Q) cu Q) :I:== -Q) cu.s:: .s::- 3:1il ~.. 1IlJ!! I: I: o Q) ~E ~ E :s 0 00 ~E .oo.~Gl ~ ~ g~Gl~~:5 _____~ ~ -g.c: t'U 0.- Co cu- c:-- 0.Q) cu.9 ~Gl"O i~~ ~oGl ~<(c.g_ o~ :!::5.~ Q)(J) 0 ~i m~g ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~2g E~~cu~~ ~~~ ~.~ -~~ ""Glcu ~ ~ a € ~ ~ t ''E -= ~ a ~ c: ~ ~ g,~ o ~~~cu[%~S~~!o ~-~ ~c:2 ~cuo.E~Eoo~oE 0; ~~~ ~'~5 ~Q)!~~Q)~~Bt ~~ ~~5 ~~.~ c:2_a:s=ac:~w~ ~~ ~o~oc ~OU a:s~SE~E~w~~ > E=Gl c=OGl;::'u;'->-Co ~~ .0"0 ~~~ g~n~~roem~o -0 ~~Q) JBa.~ niE~~~~Q)~~_.S:.e~ ~<3~ ~roQ) ~~m~~~E~~~ Uti) ~~~ -g .~ ~ 0.. a. tI) - 8 c: > a:s m .- ~ - 0 a:s~o ~.~~a~~o~~~ ~I ~.9~ ~~I~~I~~~~i~~~ ro. ~~~ ~E;~~E~~~-gE~gE ~m 8~~ "0 Gl 0 ~ Gl 5 0. ~ - ~ ~ III ~;:: ':;; 0 ~ Gl (/) 5~~Gl~1~g~~~gE~ e~ csg ~~~5m,~~'~~Q)~~~! ~~ Q).~~ WE'~~mESQ)~~E~xo -~ ~~~ ~<( ~c:"O o~..c ~o en~~ "C~ c;Q)- .9:! t::: Q) :::J 0 Q).2 co "0 - 0 0."'5 ~ - c: "C a.. ~~~i~oi~E~~:~~ ~~ .~~! a: 0 g. 0 .- c: a. 0.== c: c: 0 tI) :J .- Q) c: - cO~-~'Eo umE~~tI) o~ ..c'-U ~~~i~~Q)!~~"Cni~~ .g& ~!s a..m~~g~~Q)8~m~~g.~:e ~ag $ 23 ~.5 ~ ~.~ 00 ~~ E 0.- ~ 1i)'-"C a.;;: 0 mm'5~~SE~~~mmQ)c.~~g ~gm -EC"~:"=- _Oc>Q)=~~E:+::..c J:::;::;cu ~ Q)t:::c.<($=Q)c:wm --S~ -roOl c: u ~ ~ c.. .-:3:..c.-:J en w ..c '0 0 tI) U '* Q)~~c.m~Q)c:~5"Oe5~~ffi~ ~li~ [Egi~~~.~~~j'5~gg~.~~~~E .Q~ ~Cii:CC"c'~ ga:u ~g:5<;'a.~-E- 2; Q) ~ ~~~~~~.QE~c~m&E~~Q)o~5~ ~~~2Q)~ni~8.Q0~a:sSO~S~.~o! ~Q)bESQ)~Obnig~~.-!~~&EE~~ C:'~6~C:::C~Q)o"C'EI.()Effi-Q)::"'C ~.- ..:J~ ~omE..c ~0Q)0 ~c.._.mo~u !uQ)c t:::~E~~E~SW~~~~~~e~ ~~~.~~&~8~~~~i~~E~E~.~Q)~ C1) ~ c..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {} 5rW.gJ -;:g g. B.~ 2 g.~ 8~5E::a:smmgo~~2c~IDUU~~~ID ~~u~c:~~~~~~ID~;.~~8&~~~D ~ 5 qj o'c ~ 00. cu 0 -g 5 ~ W w ~ ~ -E e .c ~ 9-.s. > ._ Ol 0 0. 1:: c Gl 'u; c .l!! .- .- ~ 0 ~ - - v; 52 .~ .!a c: g>~ ~ ~ o'~ E w :::J 0 S :: ~ ~ o'~ Q) ~.c C1)~~~~Q.m~!E'~8~~5w.~gu~~i ~DNC:a=Q)~ oE~C>oo:JIDIDID~ >~Q)~o.S~IDIDUO~.5'~~~C:Q)'~~~E ~woc~a:sw~SS~OO~:3:~w<(~a.ma:s~ 0.. ... ~ -0 0 ~ ~ ~ c~i ~~ w ~ ~! ~ 0 g.~ ~ ~:::: c >.:!::: 8. <1> ~ .9 Q>Q)"C a:s~m a:::o mC:C> oJ:: ~5~ ~Q)tI) Q)2 g<~ ~i iig ::;~::E Q)~~ S~ 8:tti~ ~Q) ~;::+:: i-Glog E~~m>.~ m~~ ~.~ ;g~, Q) E.e~IDt.t:: .<1>a~ ~~ ~>..- 1D n .0 8 Q) g.ta o.CU .Q.Iq :5 E c - 0 a:s - '0 ~go Gl>~E ~~(J)OGl 0; (J) C .__ ~mau~E~~~E 2~ID ~ m 2 u Q) ~ c: >. Q)"o "'E _ t::: ~~ ~ g :5 w!~ c:.~_CU=0.C:~0a:s u~ ~~5 ~.2~ a:s~~EBE~oo~i!~ .Ou E ::c ....... g ~ .8 JB $:'00'(3 ~ 5 0 - 0 >. Q) '53a.g ~::::a:s'Q;~CU4>UEg> ~~ ~B~ ~cu: ~i~~~j~~~'~ ~: IDQ)C u~s 0 R8.~EgoC:Q)a:s CU'- .g~5 ~'5~ ~gw~~~~~~~ ~~ ~.s~ ~i~ri'E~.9'~EQ)~:3:Q)! uw 5t:::o!!! c~Q)C:Q)Q).2u.~Ea:su~- a:s oJ 10...1 .2 ~ -'-ai.~ E::c -g:::: -g ~ ~ S ~ Q) (ij 8 g.~ ~ 53 8 Q) a5 5 a a:s ~ Q) ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ >. ~ U5 g~~~~~!~~~~gE~ e~ <3:5g ~~~~cu.~~.~~~ea.~~ ~~ Q)~'E wE'~"C~ES!~oEQ);u _.~ :5u~ :3:< ~c:u ou ~u e.c-u U.c c;Q)- .9:! t::: Q) ~ () Q).2 a:s "0 - 0 0."5 <1l - C U ~ ~~~~gc>ffi~E~~;~~ ~g> .~~~ ~oe.9i~~~~~Q)~~: g~ !E~ cu"O~iJ::cQ)~~~~~'ffi0 .g& u!a:s ~i~~~~n-o"O~~:5~~Q)~ ~=E JB!9 ~.~ g Q)~ m~~ ~ 8:.9 e~ .~~ 5.'~ 8 mis.~~:5E~~~cum~Q.Q)~g IDg~ -Err~~- _O~<1l="O!E~~ .c:+::rn ~ Q) 1:: 0.< JB = Q) c: 00 m ..... - CG ~ ..... m Q) c:~=cu~.'-::J::'E~0~~'(3cB ~.2a Q)Q)Q)c.m_~c:~o"O~oc>cQ).c -a.. EEuuuffi~Q Ni'5~:JgwO.~c..t g.<( ; JB .~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ - l:T ~ eo e'ffi:€ c: CG ~ _ c: woO l:Tc'- c u ~:..=:5 >oc.c c: 0 Q) Q) ~~~~~e.QE~~~m&E~~Q)o~:5~ ~~~SQ)~~~8.2oo~a:sJBOc::5~~o! ~Q)~~:5Q)~Ob~~~Q).-!~~~E~~ c2C>-c~GlGl~~~~Ei-Gl;::"OE~- ..=>~ C:OmE.c"-'Q)O(l)O oc._so~u ~"O~c<(1::~E~~E~S(/)~~lll$lll~~~ ~~~~~&~8~~~~i~~.5~EQ>.~Q)~ CD ~ c..~:-2 e @ @ ~ ~ C) ~ en.gJ -; ~ ffi" B"E 2 g.s: 8~~E~cumCGgo~~SC~<1>~u'~~~Q) ~~o~~~~~~~~~m~.~~g&i~2;~ ~ 5 ~o c: ~ & CG g-g.2'g cu.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s g.~ ~:~~~iID!E~~~~o~~~.co'~~!.5 ~~'~'E~a.mi!E~8~~goo~g~~~i ~~~~a~!~Q)8~~~.~~i~:'~~>E ~w~~~w~~S~OO~~~Cii<(~~~~g 0.. ... STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT METRO RIGHT OF WAY 1500 W CO RD B2 ROSEVILLE. MN 55113 -3174 LYNN S KROISS & STEPHEN J & MARTHA K KROISS 5605 ZUMBRA DR EXCELSIOR. MN 55331 -7760 MICHAEL J & JENNIFER J HIDDING 8415 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7712 PATRICK J & LEE ANNE EASTMAN 8425 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7712 SCOTT & KRISTIN NEUMAN 8435 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7712 LEROY MCCARTY 8445 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7712 SCOTT A & MICHELLE M TORBORG 8455 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7712 PETER R & ANNE M VOAS 8450 MISSION HILLS CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7720 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL, MN 55155 -1801 DAVID R & BRENDA M WITZIG 8465 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7712 DANIEL EASTMAN & LEANNE DODDS 8451 MISSION HILLS CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7720 JEFFREY A GORRALL & PATRICIA C GORRALL 8460 MISSION HILLS CIR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7720 KIMBERLEY THOMAS 8444 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7712 SCOTT R & STEPHANIE K RICH 8475 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7712 J CHARLES & BONNIE J EHLERS 8485 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7712 PATRICIA SILVA & MICHAEL D MAULE 8464 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7712 CHIU & HUNG CHING CHAN 8470 MISSION HILLS CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7720 JOHN N & CAROLINE 0 HERBECK 8471 MISSION HILLS CIR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7720 STATE OF MINNESOTA-DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD MAILSTOP 631 ST PAUL, MN 55155 -1899 CHARLES J & ELAINE M EASTMAN 8480 MISSION HILLS CIR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7720 ROBERT A & LISA K GAUVIN 460 MISSION HILLS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7714 RANDY V ROSETH & PENNY P WHITE 450 MISSION HILLS CT CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7714 TONY L & PATRICIA J FERGUSON 8495 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7712 DALE E & RHONDA R TIREVOLD 8481 MISSION HILLS CIR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7720 MISSION HILLS GARDEN HOMES 2681 LONG LAKE RD ROSEVILLE , MN 55113 -1128 CLINT R & JENNIFER J HURT 8491 MISSION HILLS CIR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7720 JOHN G & MARIGO N GEROGEORGE 470 MISSION HILLS CT CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7714 PATRICK S & CONSTANCE SULLIVAN 8500 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7719 SCOTT E & SHANNON L FIEDLER 8511 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7713 DANIEL M & JANE A ZUREICH 8490 MISSION HILLS CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7720 RICHARD A SWANSON 8520 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7719 BONITA R MENDEN 8504 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7719 KARLA K THOMSON 8524 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7719 RICHARD & EVELYN J KETTLER 8521 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -7719 CONNIE M MOEHL 8540 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7719 STEVEN M & TRACY A SCHEID 451 MISSION HILLS CT CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7714 JEFFREY G & LEA J NORDOS 461 MISSION HILLS CT CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7714 VERNON W & BARBARA L LINDEMANN 552 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7716 RAYMOND C ORTMAN JR JULIANNE E ORTMAN 8525 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7713 MICHAEL S & STEPHANIE R DILLE 291 TIMBER HILL RD CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9129 SUSAN M DEAN 8525 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -7719 JOHN A & JUDITH A HRUBY 419 PORTSIDE DR AMELIA ISLAND FERNANDINA BEACH. FL 32034 -4841 DIANE M DEPOE 548 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7716 JOCELYNE RYAN 576 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -7716 LAUREL J BOSECK 592 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7716 MATTHEW L & KATHLEEN ALBRECHT 6220 CASCADE PASS CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9476 LAWRENCE 0 & NANCY E STEIN 8541 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7713 MARCELLA HOWE & JOYCE HANSON TRUSTEES OF TRUST 596 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7717 GEORGE 0 STACY 584 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7716 SANDRA E GEVING 536 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7716 DANIEL T & KELLY A FASCHING 8550 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7713 HAROLD JR & POLLY L HARTIN 540 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7716 SUSAN M HOAGLUND 588 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7716 MARCIA L JOSEPHSON 528 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7715 PETER W & GLORIA JEAN WILCZEK 581 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -7716 ROGER A WAINWRIGHT 532 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -7715 NINA J KREIENBRINK 520 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7715 LYNETTE R LARSON 512 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7715 ARDIS M OLUFSON 565 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7716 RICHARD K & THERESA A HESS 8561 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7713 NADINE N NELSON 484 FRISCO CT CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7718 VIRGINIA A WELLUMSON 585 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7716 DALE E & BETTY HETLAND 524 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7715 GEORGE J CARLYLE & JANELLE VEILLEUX CARLYLE 8560 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7713 CURTIS & PATRICIA BRANDON 516 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7715 VERNIS M STROM 569 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7716 MARY A AINSWORTH 508 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7715 RUTH M THONANDER 549 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7716 LENORE J MOLSTAD 589 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7716 JANEEN D LANDSBERGER 480 FRISCO CT CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7718 KATHY J MCKIM 533 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7715 VIOLA M COLLING HAM 573 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7716 VERLE R & BETTE M POFFENBERGER 593 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7716 ERWIN C & CLARA M SIDER 553 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7716 SUNITAGANGOPADHYAY & SHUBHAGAT GANGOPADHYAY 8571 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7713 RONALD S & BAR BRA T EWING 8570 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7713 BARBARA J WELLUMSON 577 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7716 BONNIE JEAN THURK 537 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7716 GRACE REGALADO 525 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7715 CAROL K GELDERT 557 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7716 BEVERLY E CHRISTENSEN 517 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7715 MONICA M GALUSKA 509 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7715 LYNETTE LAABS 541 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7716 JUBA FAMILY 1989 TRUST 8788 JEWEL RIDGE AVE LAS VEGAS, NV 89148 -1435 FRANK J HANISH & CAREN SOENS 561 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7716 ROBERT J ZINNEL TRUSTEE OF TRUST 504 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7715 THOMAS J BOURNE 471 FRISCO CT CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7718 ADELINE R HARRIS 529 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7715 JAMES E PARISH 545 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7716 BERNARD M & JOANN C GAYTKO 521 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7715 JAMES A & MARILYN L CRAWFORD 8581 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7713 BRIAN M & DAWN M RODELL RILEY 8580 MISSION HILLS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7713 ROBERT C & SUSAN J ERICKSON 513 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN ,~MN 55317 -7715 JANET E BROWN 501 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7715 CARL P & VIRGINIA R PRIOR 500 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7715 ROSEMARY B WILL 475 FRISCO CT CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7718 KATHLEEN M JOHANNES 430 MISSION HILLS WAY E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7705 JEAN M KAMRATH 434 MISSION HILLS WAY E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7705 AMANDA C WINBLAD-VONWALTER 438 MISSION HILLS WAY E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7705 MICHELLE J ERICKSON-CODY 442 MISSION HILLS WAY E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7705 JENNIFER RENKL Y 446 MISSION HILLS WAY E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7705 JOHN 0 & MARY JO EICHLER TRUSTEE OF TRUST 25628 CORDOVA LN RIO VERDE, AZ 85263 -7146 ntrC d Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Hurt Variance Planning Case No. 05-32 8491 Mission Hills Circle City of Chanhassen Lake Susan M i s s i o n H i l l s L a e n l e c r i C s d l l v i H SUBJECT SITE l B n s o n i M s i s a a i l y M P f Hills Mission i t e a Crt l e d r C G r t 1 M 0 i 1 i H s l l s W 86th St n y s D o w i r i o . s H s n i M M H i s s i i o n l H l i l l s s Fr i s L c D a o r n . e C r t W 86th St t r C e c i R M i Marshland Trl s s i o E n W l l i a H y B H y i l l l W aMonk Crt W M a i s s ion c H k b e i r d a C r r t t l a