PC SUM 2006 08 01
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
SUMMARY MINUTES
AUGUST 1, 2006
Chairman McDonald called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Jerry McDonald, Kurt Papke, Dan Keefe, Debbie Larson, and
Kevin Dillon
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Deborah Zorn and Mark Undestad
STAFF PRESENT:
Bob Generous, Senior Planner; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner;
Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer; and Paul Oehme, City Engineer
PUBLIC HEARING:
BOULDER COVE: REQUEST FOR REZONING OF PROPERTY FROM
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY (RSF) TO RESIDENTIAL LOW & MEDIUM
(RLM), SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES AND A SITE PLAN FOR A ONE,
TWO AND THREE UNIT TOWN HOME COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON
PROPERTY NORTH OF HIGHWAY 7, EAST OF CHURCH ROAD AND
ND
SOUTH OF WEST 62 STREET, PLANNING CASE NO. 06-10, APPLICANT,
ROGER DERRICK, COTTAGE HOMESTEADS AT BOULDER COVE, LLC,
(120 DAY DEADLINE WAIVED.)
Public Present:
Name Address
Julie Hirsch 6321 Church Road
Dan Torgerson 6185 Strawberry Lane
James Gagnon 26125 Oak Leaf Trail
Lisa Wagner 26145 Oak Leaf Trail
nd
Wade Navratil 3751 West 62 Street
Stacey Klein 26000 Shorewood Oaks Drive
Kim McReavy 1350 Heather Court
Bill McReavy 3790 Meadow Lane
William Kahman 3780 Meadow Lane
Merlyn Wanous 6231 Church Road
nd
Leah Schneider 26420 West 62 Street
Jill Biatek 26285 Oak Leaf Trail
Mike & Mary K. Barga 26305 Oak Leaf Trail
Dory & Tom Croskey 26265 Oak Leaf Trail
Marcus Hoffmann 6195 Strawberry Lane
David Igel 501 Big Woods Boulevard
Roger Derrick 11954 Germanic Terrace, Eden Prairie
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
Cara Otto Otto Associates
Dan Smock 2475 Crestview Parkway
Henry Vloo Braun Intertec
Carrie Miller 6311 Church Road
Dave Hughes 6311 Church Road
Jacqui Kouba 3520 Highway 7
nd
Mark Plewka 26540 West 62 Street
nd
Robin Dodson 26540 West 62 Street
Jeff Jibben 26300 Oak Leaf Trail
Ken Durr 4830 Westgate Road, Minnetonka
Fan Tielking 26225 Oak Leaf Trail
Keith Korinke 6310 Church Road
Becky Finley 6310 Church Road
John M. Hugo 26110 Oak Leaf Trail
Sharmeen Al-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Alyson Fauske addressed
traffic and drainage issues associated with the development. Ray Wuolo with Barr
Engineering talked about hydrology and ground water issues in the area. Commissioner
Papke asked for clarification of the drainage system in the area, and specifically how the
French drainage system works and how the clay liner in the storm water pond will work.
Chairman McDonald asked about the capacity requirements for the storm water ponds.
Commissioner Keefe asked about design criteria for storm water piping and ponds, if
nd
West 62 Street and Church Road were adequate to handle the additional traffic,
berming, and tree loss. Commissioner Papke asked staff to explain their rationale for
allowing higher hard surface coverage percentages. The applicant, Roger Derrick with
Cottage Homesteads addressed the issues of potential buyers, traffic, drainage, tree
preservation, and price point for the units. Chairman McDonald opened the public
hearing.
Dave Hughes, speaking on behalf of his daughter and husband, Carrie and Mike Miller
who live adjacent to this property, spoke to the drainage problems in the area, suggested
the pond should be moved to the other side of the property, placement of the water line
loop, noise mitigation along Highway 7, and the need for a sidewalk along Church Road.
Tom Croskey, 26265 Oak Leaf Trail, stated he was representing members of the
nd
Shorewood Oaks Association, West 62 Street and Strawberry Lane residents. He talked
about the need to address drainage in this area, and cited the legal standards for rezoning.
Kenneth Durr, 4830 Westgate Road, Minnetonka and developer of Minnewashta
Landings provided background on the series of storm water ponds that were built in his
development to address the drainage issues from Highway 7 and developments north of
Highway 7. He also had concern with the density of the development in relation to
nd
runoff concerns. Robin Dodson, 26540 West 62 Street had concerns with traffic and
nd
pedestrian safety on West 62 Street with the additional traffic being generated by this
development. Kim McReavy,1350 Heather Court opposed the rezoning of the property.
Julie Hirsch, 6321 Church Road, one of the three properties adjacent to this development
noted that the developer was willing to provide T connections to the French drain tile, but
was wondering if they developer could be required to provide the connection to their
2
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
properties and then assume any liabilities that could incur if the drains adversely affect
their properties even more, and/or enhances already existing water issues. Marcus
Hoffman, 6195 Strawberry Lane, which is the house with the driveway adjacent to the
nd
road into this development, expressed concern with traffic on West 62 Street and
suggested putting a right-in only off of Highway 7 into this development to help with
nd
traffic on West 62 Street. Wade Navratil who lives on the western boundary of this
property stated he was not opposed to the development but did have concern with the
traffic, drainage and rezoning. Carrie Miller, 6311 Church Road would support the need
for a trail in this area because the development is located between two public parks.
David Igel who lives at 501 Big Woods Boulevard in Chanhassen, but used to live on
Strawberry Lane stated concern with the location of the entrance on the curve of West
nd
62 Street and Strawberry Lane, and talked about drainage issues. Chairman McDonald
closed the public hearing. After discussion and comments by the commission, the
following motions were made.
Papke moved, Dillon seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval
of Case #06-10 to rezone 12.99 acres of property zoned RSF, Residential Single
Family to RLM, Residential Low and Medium Density District for the Boulder Cove
as shown on the plans dated received July 7, 2006, and revised July 25, 2006, subject
to the following condition:
1.Lot 22, Block 1, Boulder Cover shall remain under the Residential Single Family
zoning district.
All voted in favor, except Keefe who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of
4 to 1.
Papke moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision Case #06-10 for Boulder Cove for
39 lots and 1 outlot as shown on the plans received July 7, 2006 and revised July 25,
2006, subject to the following conditions:
1.Hydraulic calculations must be submitted with the final plat application for staff
review. The revised calculations should include the entire area drained by the north
ditch of Trunk Highway 7 since concentration points have been established at the
inlets of the two existing culverts heading south underneath Trunk Highway 7.
2.The top and bottom of wall elevations must be shown on the final grading plan.
3.The developer will reimburse the City the cost of the Barr analysis upon final plat
approval.
4.Any retaining wall four feet high or taller must be designed by an engineer registered
in the State of Minnesota and requires a building permit.
3
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
5.The developer is required to obtain any necessary permits for the sanitary sewer
extension from the Metropolitan Council (sewer connection permit) and the City of
nd
Shorewood (work in right-of-way permit) and West 62 Street must be restored.
6.Rim and invert elevations of all sanitary and storm sewers must be shown on the final
utility plan.
7.The utility plan must show the existing drainage and utility easements on the Miller
and Navratil properties.
8.The developer shall be responsible for any damage to the Miller’s fence as a result of
the watermain installation.
9.The existing wells and septic systems must be properly removed/abandoned.
10.Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the
City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed
construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat.
11.The private street must be constructed to a 7-ton design.
12.The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in
rear yard areas and bufferyards.
13.Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the dripline for tree #71 or as
close to that location as possible. All other tree preservation fencing shall be installed
at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction.
14.All landscape planting shall be field located. No plantings will be allowed within the
dripline of tree #71 or below the NWL of the proposed pond.
15.No evergreens shall be planted in the front yards within a space less than 40 feet in
width between driveways.
16.The grading and the storm sewer alignment shall be shifted as far east as needed in
order to protect and save the evergreens along the westerly property line.
17.Payment of park fees at the rate in force at the time of platting shall be required as a
condition of approval. The 2006 park dedication fees are $5,800 per single family
dwelling, $5,000 for each unit in a duplex, and $3,800 for each unit within a three-plex.
18.Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all storm water ponds and
storm water conveyance features outside of the public ROW.
19.The future storm water pond shall be constructed prior to mass grading of the site and
shall be used as a temporary sediment basin. A temporary outlet shall be installed
4
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
(perforated standpipe with rock cone) in the temporary sediment basin. A detail shall
be provided within the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
20.Energy dissipation shall be installed at the flared-end section outlet of the storm water
basin within 24 hours of outlet installation.
21.Area inlets and curbside inlet control (Wimco or similar) shall be installed within 24
hours of inlet installation. A detail shall be provided in the SWPPP.
22.The proposed rock construction entrance shall be a minimum 20 feet in width and 75
feet in length with a filter fabric installed under the rock.
23.All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover
year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames:
Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can
Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area
10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.)
Flatter than 10:1 21 days
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any
exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as
a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or
other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water.
24.Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and
street sweeping as needed. A pickup broom shall be used at a minimum of once per
week or as conditions warrant.
25.The plans shall be revised to include a typical erosion control detail for individual lots
and multifamily lots.
26.At this time the total estimated SWMP fees payable upon approval of the final plat
are estimated at $67,384. The applicant will receive a water quality credit of 50% of
the per-acre water quality charge for each acre treated by the on-site pond.
27.The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory
agencies (e.g., Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction
Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering)) and comply with
their conditions of approval.
28.Building Department conditions:
a.Accessibility must be provided to all portions of the development and a
percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in
accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. Further
5
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
information is needed to determine these requirements.
b.Buildings over 8500 square feet of floor area are required to be protected with an
automatic sprinkler system. For the purposes of this requirement property lines
do not constitute separate buildings and the areas of basements and garages are
included in the floor area threshold.
c.The buildings will be required to be designed by an architect and engineer as
determined by the Building Official.
d.The developer must submit a list of proposed street name(s) and an addressing
plan for review and approval prior to final plat of the property.
e.Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing any structures on the
site. Application for such permits must include hazardous substances
investigative and proposed mitigation reports. Existing wells and on-site sewage
treatment systems but be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code.
f.A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections
Division before permits can be issued.
g.Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one-
hour fire-resistive construction.
h.Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a
professional engineer.
i.Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services.
j.The developer and or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early
as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures.
k.The developer must coordinate the address changes of the two existing homes
with the construction of the development and provide access for emergency
vehicles at all times.
29.Fire Marshal conditions:
a.A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps,
trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This
is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by
firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1.
b.Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be
installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and
6
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of
protection are provided.
c.Temporary street signs shall be installed at street intersections once construction
of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire
Code Section 501.4.
d.Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the
imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather
driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3.
e.No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs
must either be removed from site or chipped.
f.Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable.
30.All existing buildings on the site, with the exception of the house and garage on lot 22,
block 1, shall be removed.
31.Lot 22, Block 1, shall maintain a maximum hard surface coverage of 25%.
32.Sheets 2, 3, 4 and 5 shall be modified to reflect the new layout of Outlot A.
33.A cross-access easement agreement shall be granted in favor of the property located at
3520 Highway 7.”
34.Work with the developer to resolve the back flow on the drain tile at the vicinity of
the French tile outlet.
35. Work with the developer to see if the additional significant trees can be saved.
All voted in favor, except Keefe who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of
4 to 1.
Papke moved, Dillon seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval
of Site Plan #06-10 to construct 4 threeplexes as shown on the plans dated Received
July 7, 2006 and revised July 25, 2006, subject to the following conditions:
1.The applicant shall evaluate the potential for wing walls between the patios on the three-
plexes.
2.The three-plexes shall be built as shown on the elevations and floor plans dated received
February 3, 2006.
3.The applicant shall utilize cultured stone on a variety of elevations, i.e. an entire garage
elevation or an entire entryway elevation, rather than stopping at the midpoint of a wall.
7
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
The applicant shall also use Hardie board siding versus stucco.
4.The applicant shall submit drawings showing the exterior elevations and materials for the
single-family and duplex units.
All voted in favor, except Keefe who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of
4 to 1.
PUBLIC HEARING:
REQUEST FOR AN INTERIM USE PERMIT FOR OFF-SITE GRADING FOR
THE DISPOSAL OF DIRT FROM THE HIGHWAY 312 CORRIDOR ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1560 BLUFF CREEK DRIVE AND 1425 BLUFF
CREEK DRIVE, AND SOUTH OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY RAIL
CORRIDOR AND BLUFF CREEK DRIVE, PLANNING CASE NO. 06-28,
ZUMBRO RIVER CONSTRUCTORS.
Public Present:
Name Address
Brad Moe 14372 Westridge Drive, Eden Prairie
Mike Billing 312 Lake Hazeltine Drive, Chaska
Cindy Peterson 1161 Bluff Creek Drive
Lindsay Lein 1161 Bluff Creek Drive
Mary Fafiushi 1520 West Farm Road, Chaska
Alyson Fauske presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Dillon asked for an
explanation of why this request was being made. Commissioner Larson asked how the
operation would impact neighboring properties. Commissioner Papke asked staff to
explain how they arrived at the traffic calculations. Commissioner Dillon asked about the
proximity and impact of these sites to the Seminary Fen. Mike Billing with Zumbro
River Contractors addressed the issues of site selection, impact to the fen, and haul
routes. The co-applicant Brad Moe, 14372 Westridge Drive, Eden Prairie, also speaking
on behalf of his father-in-law, Harold Hesse who lives at 1425 Bluff Creek Drive,
Chanhassen, explained why they requested fill be brought onto their property. Chairman
McDonald opened the public hearing. Cindy Peterson, owner of Bluff Creek Inn
expressed concern with Site 2 regarding traffic interfering with guest parking, noise,
compaction of the land affecting their ground water and well, drainage, and the affect on
their business. Chairman McDonald closed the public hearing. After commissioner
comments and discussion, the following motions were made.
Keefe moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends
approval of Planning Case #06-28 for Interim Use Permits to grade and fill Site 1
(1425 Bluff Creek Drive) in conformance with the grading plans prepared by
Zumbro River Constructors for the site, subject to the following conditions:
8
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
1. “Truck Hauling” signs posted at each end of Bluff Creek Drive.
2. Flag-persons must be on-site during trucking operations.
3. Bluff Creek Drive must be scraped and swept daily.
4. For safety reasons, access to the site should be via West Farm Road. The owner and
applicant are responsible for obtaining permission for this access.
5. A $4,500 escrow must be posted to guarantee the replacement of Bluff Creek Drive
curb and gutter and pavement that is damaged due to the trucking operations at this
site.
6. Hours of operations shall be 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no work allowed on holidays.
7. The site access must be clearly shown on the plan.
8. No fill shall be placed within the Bluff Creek Drive right-of-way.
9.The proposed swale along the southeast edge of the property shall be constructed to
minimize the potential for erosion around existing trees.
10. Each site shall be examined by a professional wetland delineator to determine
whether jurisdictional wetlands exist on-site or within 150 feet of the proposed fill.
Any wetlands that are identified shall be delineated, then reviewed by the City prior
to any work commencing on-site. If the delineation shows the proposed project to
include wetland impact, the applicant shall obtain a wetland alteration permit from the
City prior to wetland impacts occurring.
11. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall
be maintained around any ag/urban wetlands. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved,
surveyed and staked in accordance with the City’s wetland ordinance. The applicant
shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before
construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a
setback of at least 40 feet from ag/urban wetland buffer edges.
12. Wetland replacement, if necessary, shall occur in a manner consistent with the
wetland alteration permit and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420).
13. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1.
All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover
year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames:
Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can
Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area
10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.)
9
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
Flatter than 10:1 21 days
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any
exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as
a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or
other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water.
14. Silt fence shall be installed at the base of all proposed slopes in accordance with
Chanhassen Standard Detail Plates 5300. A rock construction entrance meeting the
specifications of Chanhassen Standard Detail Plate 5301 shall be installed where truck
traffic will enter and exit Bluff Creek Drive. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public
streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as-needed. Wimco-type
inlet protection shall be installed in accordance with Chanhassen Standard Detail Plate
5302A in all catch basins within 200 feet of the proposed project sites and maintained as
needed. The construction plans shall be revised to show the locations of the proposed
silt fence, rock construction entrances and Wimco-type inlet protection and to include
Chanhassen Standard Detail Plates 5300, 5301 and 5302A.
15. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory
agencies (e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Site Permit), Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with
their conditions of approval. Zumbro River Constructors shall apply for and receive
an amendment to their existing NPDES Phase II Construction Permit for the Trunk
Highway 212 project from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to incorporate a
storm water pollution prevention plan for these sites.
16. The applicant should review proposed slopes and runoff velocities for the site and
provide additional rock checks as an erosion control mechanism if needed. Rock
checks proposed within the right-of-way for Bluff Creek Drive must be reviewed and
approved by the City prior to installation.
All voted in favor, except Papke who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of
4 to 1.
Keefe moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends
approval of Planning Case #06-28 for Interim Use Permits to grade and fill Site 3
(1560 Bluff Creek Drive) in conformance with the grading plans prepared by
Zumbro River Constructors for the site, subject to the following conditions:
1. Overland hauling must utilize the existing creek crossing for the Bluff Creek Drive
realignment.
2. No fill shall be placed within the Bluff Creek Drive right-of-way.
10
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
3. Hours of operations are 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no work allowed on holidays.
4. Each site shall be examined by a professional wetland delineator to determine
whether jurisdictional wetlands exist on-site or within 150 feet of the proposed fill.
Any wetlands that are identified shall be delineated, then reviewed by the City prior
to any work commencing on-site. If the delineation shows the proposed project to
include wetland impact, the applicant shall obtain a wetland alteration permit from the
City prior to wetland impacts occurring.
5. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall
be maintained around any ag/urban wetlands. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved,
surveyed and staked in accordance with the City’s wetland ordinance. The applicant
shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before
construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a
setback of at least 40 feet from ag/urban wetland buffer edges.
6. Wetland replacement, if necessary, shall occur in a manner consistent with the
wetland alteration permit and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420).
7. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1.
All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover
year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames:
Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can
Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area
10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.)
Flatter than 10:1 21 days
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any
exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as
a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or
other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water.
8. Silt fence shall be installed at the base of all proposed slopes in accordance with
Chanhassen Standard Detail Plates 5300. A rock construction entrance meeting the
specifications of Chanhassen Standard Detail Plate 5301 shall be installed where truck
traffic will enter and exit Bluff Creek Drive. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public
streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as-needed. Wimco-type
inlet protection shall be installed in accordance with Chanhassen Standard Detail Plate
5302A in all catch basins within 200 feet of the proposed project sites and maintained as
needed. The construction plans shall be revised to show the locations of the proposed
silt fence, rock construction entrances and Wimco-type inlet protection and to include
Chanhassen Standard Detail Plates 5300, 5301 and 5302A.
11
Planning Commission Meeting – August 1, 2006
9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory
agencies (e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Site Permit), Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with
their conditions of approval. Zumbro River Constructors shall apply for and receive
an amendment to their existing NPDES Phase II Construction Permit for the Trunk
Highway 212 project from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to incorporate a
storm water pollution prevention plan for these sites.
10. The applicant should review proposed slopes and runoff velocities for the site and
provide additional rock checks as an erosion control mechanism if needed. Rock
checks proposed within the right-of-way for Bluff Creek Drive must be reviewed and
approved by the City prior to installation.
All voted in favor, except Papke who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of
4 to 1.
Keefe moved, Larson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission
recommends denial of Planning Case #06-28 for Interim Use Permit to grade and fill
properties identified as Site 2 located southwest of Bluff Creek Drive, south of the
Hennepin County Regional Trail Corridor and north of the Bluff Creek Inn. All
voted in favor, except Papke who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to
1.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:Commissioner Papke noted the verbatim and
summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated July 18, 2006 as
presented.
Chairman McDonald adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 10:35 p.m.
Submitted by Kate Aanenson
Community Development Director
Prepared by Nann Opheim
12