Loading...
3. Fox HillCITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DATE: January 2, 2007 3 CC DATE: January 22, 2007 REVIEW DEADLINE: January 30, 2007 CASE #: 07-03 BY: Al-Jaff, et al PROPOSAL: Preliminary Plat to Subdivide property into 3 single-family lots with a Variance to allow a private street — FOX HILL SUBDIVISION LOCATION: West of Chanhassen Road (Highway 101) and south of Fox Ho*llow Drive (6570 Chanhassen Road) APPLICANT: 10 Spring Homes, Inc. 7925 Stone Creek Drive, Suite 120 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 215-8535 scott@ l Ospring.com PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Single Family Residential District 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (Net Density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 1.69 acres DENSITY: 1.77 Units per Acre Gross - 2.19 Units per Acre Net SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivision of 1.69 acres into 3 single-family lots, and a variance to allow a private street. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Subdivision Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi judicial decision. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 2 of 16 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to subdivide 1.69 acres into 3 single-family lots. The property is zoned RSF, Single Family Residential District. The site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Fox Hollow Drive and Chanhassen Road (Highway 101) and contains a single- family home that is proposed to be demolished. Access to the site is proposed off of a private street. Near Mountain Bl� d At Road Pleasant Mew Road Pleasant view :E- Jose h Curve O �? ut Drive <<o+ Q Joseph Cu ox Broadmoore Dri Foxtail SUBJECT PROPERTY y All lots meet the minimum lot area, width and depth requirements of the zoning ordinance with an average lot area of 20,183 square feet (these are lots served by a private street and the area of the private street is excluded from the overall lot area). City Code requires a variance to allow a private street. Staff is recommending approval of the variance to eliminate access to Highway 101. This issue is discussed in detail later in the report. Staff is recommending approval of the subdivision with variances with conditions outlined in the staff report. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 3 of 16 PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 1.69 acre site into 3 single-family lots. The density of the proposed subdivision is 1.77 units per acre gross and 2.19 units per acre net. All lots exceed the minimum 15,000 square feet of area, with an average lot size of 20,183 square feet. All proposed lots meet the minimum width and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The lots are proposed to be served via a private street. The City Code requires a 30 foot front yard setback for lots served by private streets. The front yard is the lot line nearest the public right-of-way that provides access to the parcel. As such, the front lot line is the northerly property line on all three lots. Also, all three lots have frontage on Highway 101. Consequently, these lots are considered corner lots and must maintain a 30 foot setback along the easterly property line as well. All remaining setbacks are 10 feet as they are side yard setbacks. Staff is recommending that Lot 3 maintain a 20-foot side yard setback along the westerly property line to provide additional buffer for the property to the west. The City may require an increase in a setback when a parcel is served by a private street (Sectionl8-57 Streets P-6). Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. WETLANDS No wetlands exist on site. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL A NPDES Phase II Construction Site Storm Water Permit will be required from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for this site. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required in conjunction with this application. The SWPPP should be provided to the City so it can be reviewed by the Carver Soil and Water Conservation District. The plans should be revised to incorporate Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control, including 5300, 5301, 5302A and 5302D. In order to ensure that the proposed infiltration area functions properly, the contractor should minimize the number of equipment trips across this part of the site. Additionally, the lightest equipment appropriate for the job should be used. Once the infiltration area is graded, the easement area should be fenced off so no further compaction occurs. The applicant may want to consider planting native shrubs, grasses and wildflowers within the infiltration area instead of sod to promote volume reduction through infiltration and evapotranspiration. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the infiltration area should be provided. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail should be included in the plan. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 4 of 16 Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3 :1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. The plans should be revised to show a rock construction entrance (minimum 75 feet in length) off Fox Hollow Drive. The rock construction entrance should be constructed in accordance with Chanhassen's Standard Detail 5301. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEES Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of $1,900/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 1.69 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $3,211. The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average city wide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single- family residential developments have a connection charge of $3,100 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $5,239 for the proposed development. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $8,450. OTHER AGENCIES The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Site Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Carver County, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 5 of 16 GRADING AND DRAINAGE The 1.7 acre site is bordered by Fox Hollow Drive to the north, State Highway 101 to the East and Fox Hollow Subdivision to the south and west. There is an existing house, two accessory structures, and a gravel drive on the site; all of these must be removed before site grading commences. The high point of the site divides the site into two main pieces. Approximately 60 percent of the drainage drains to the new low area in the southeast corner of the site. The remaining 40 percent drains through a series of catch basins and enters an existing pond north of Fox Hollow Drive. A summary of the hydrology calculations is shown on the plans. A report showing the calculations of the storm sewer and N URP will need to be provided to ensure that they meet the requirements of the City and the MPCA. The swales on the eastern side of Lot 2, between Lots 2 and 3, and the swale west of Lot 3 appears flat. A minimum slope of two percent is required for drainage. Also, the swale in the northwest corner of the house of Lot 1, back yard of Lot 2, and side yard of Lot 3 are near the foundations of the structure. These swales should not direct water toward the foundation. Plantings shall be placed outside of swales to promote drainage. Spot elevations shall be added at the building corners of Lot 1 to ensure drainage. A valley gutter should be installed at the intersection of the private drive and Fox Hollow Drive to convey water through the intersection. The developer's engineer shall also provide spot elevations around the intersection to ensure that the curb line has a minimum of 0.5% slope. The infiltration basin outlet shall be directed east of the berm of Lot 6, Block 5 of Fox Hollow. This will allow the storm water to enter the drainage ditch along Highway 101. The proposed storm line connecting to the existing system shows a bend without a structure. A structure will be required at all bends of storm sewer. Also a separation of 18" shall be maintained between the sanitary sewer and drain tile. Private street and individual driveway grades shall not exceed 10%. Ground (i.e. non -paved) surface grades shall not be less than 2%. Emergency overflow locations and elevations must be shown on the plan. An easement is required from the appropriate property owner for any off -site grading. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 6 of 16 RETAINING WALLS The proposed retaining walls are as follows: Location Length (approximate) Maximum Height (approximate) Along the driveway of lot 1 100 feet 4 feet Rear yard of lot 1 25 feet 4 feet Along the west side of the drive of lot 3 25 feet 4 feet Elevations shall be added to the bottom of retaining walls to confirm actual height. Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. UTILITIES The developer proposes to extend lateral sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer within the development. All utilities within this site shall be publicly owned and maintained. Proposed watermain will extend from the existing watermain within Fox Hollow Drive. The proposed watermain will terminate at the hydrant of Lot 3 having a total length of 270LF. Due to the alignment of the watermain off of Fox Hollow Drive, it appears that the connection cannot take place under traffic. The connection on Fox Hollow Drive must be wet -tapped. Sanitary sewer for this development will extend off of Fox Hollow Drive. A stub was provided during the Fox Hollow Subdivision which should allow this connection to be completed under traffic. Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water, and storm lines). Actual elevations of existing utilities shall be verified for accuracy. A cleanout for the sanitary sewer service will be needed for Lot 2 because of the length. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. The 2007 trunk hookup charge is $1,669 for sanitary sewer and $4,485 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. The developer will be responsible for extending lateral sewer and water service to the lots; therefore, the sanitary sewer and water connection charges will be waived. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The applicant must be aware that all public utility improvements will require a preconstruction meeting before building permit issuance. Permits from the appropriate Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 7 of 16 regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, Dept. of Health, Carver County, Watershed District and MnDOT. EASEMENTS A combined easement has been provided for utility and driveway connections. The utilities in this easement will need to be adjusted to ensure that there is a minimum of 10 feet horizontal separation between the easement and the proposed utilities. The front of Lots 2 and 3 require a 10-foot drainage and utility easement. STREETS Access to the site will be a private street off of Fox Hollow Drive. The private street must connect to Fox Hollow Drive at a 90-degree angle. The developer has provided plans showing the street as both private and public. Staff supports the variance for the private street for the following reasons: Less than four houses will be served by this street; Less hard surface coverage will be generated with the private street. A public street has a width of 31 feet while a private street is 20 feet wide. Existing trees will be saved with a private street. The private street within the development will be privately owned and maintained. The street must be built to a 7-ton design, paved to a width of 20 feet, and utilize a maximum grade of 10 percent. The fire marshal reviewed the proposed turnaround and finds it acceptable. Upon completion of the private street, the applicant shall submit a set of "as -built" plans signed by a professional civil engineer. PARKS AND TRAILS PARKS This property is located within the neighborhood park service area for North Lotus Lake Park. Future residents of Fox Hill will have convenient access to the park from Fox Hollow Drive. North Lotus Lake Park is 19.8 acres in size and features a playground, picnic shelter, trails, hockey rink, skating rink, seasonal shelter, tennis/basketball court, and a ball field. Ample off-street parking is available at the park. Many amenities at the park have been updated within the past few years. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 8 of 16 TRAILS The subject site has direct access to the Highway 101 North pedestrian trail. Upon development, all three homes will abut Highway 101 and the pedestrian trail located on the west side of the highway. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. TREE PRESERVATION/LANDSCAPING Canopy coverage and preservation calculations have not been submitted for the Fox Hill development. Staff has calculated the following coverages: Total upland area (including outlots) 73,700 SF Total canopy area (excluding wetlands) 13,000 SF Baseline canopy coverage 17% Minimum canopy coverage allowed 25% or 18,425 SF Proposed tree preservation 13% or 10,000 SF The developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore, the difference between the baseline and proposed tree preservation is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage 3,000 SF Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement 3,600 SF Difference in canopy coverage 5,425 SF Total number of trees to be planted 8 The total number of trees required for the development is 8. The applicant has proposed a total of 8 deciduous, overstory trees and 64 evergreens and 25 ornamentals within buffer yards. No more than one-third of the trees may be from any one species. All of the evergreens are proposed to be of one species. A revised landscape plan showing a variety of evergreens will be required prior to final approval. The subdivision is also required to have bufferyard plantings along Highway 101. Requirements are as follows: Location Required Proposed Hwy. 101 — bufferyard B 6 overstory trees 0 overstory trees — 20' width 10 understory trees 26 understory trees 330' length 16 shrubs Berm on lots 1 & 2 The applicant generally meets the minimum requirements for bufferyard planting along Highway 101 by planting the overall total of over and understory trees and adding a berm. The applicant is proposing to save many of the existing trees on site. Staff recommends that all trees be thoroughly protected by installing fencing around all groups. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 9 of 16 COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Lot Lot Lot Home Area Width Depth Setback Ordinance 15,000 100' 125' 30' front/rear 10' sides BLOCK 1 Lot 1 18,067 115' 260' 30'/NA 10' Lot 2 19,372 115' 260' 30'/NA 10' Lot 3 23,112 115' 260' 30'/NA 20' SUBDIVISION - FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District and the zoning ordinance if the private street is approved. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan and subdivision ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 10 of 16 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. 7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. VARIANCE Section 18-57. Streets. (s) Private streets serving up to four lots may be permitted in the A2, RR, RSF, R4 and RLM (when less than four units per acre) districts if the criteria in variance section 18-22 are met and upon consideration of the following: (1) The prevailing development pattern makes it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public street. In making this determination, the city may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence of wetlands. (2) After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. (3) The use of a private street will permit enhanced protection of the city's natural resources, including wetlands and protected areas. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 11 of 16 T =r ' $T ' ST Iw F�— _ 4l94 �i �3y / I I 1 IS Jr �' I �+3«1i ' I 7 Es E11 9,.9J1 I Y RT _ Er1 .G Y� �_ -i�PJj IIC�I `PP F it � V 6 `� - FXIS-nh�. f I r 6rr_ary 1O 1 `I] tl 1, f - - 3-1a 91:3 I —931. P I APopR II I I M S I �y F 0 IN _ass: A — vl 1 i � >ks'a,�r�e 1 0 827 x�l �i��� cif ri�� area) I I — --PIz.Pj*, ::FQ MAWAff .axn ..p1I;1_; yT---- �— I x Li a _- >a�2113 WkX•Q] Sr,au Ix_D YATa. 11.3 '� � �a SEAT FRr7 ',�2+1 323 .00 r T.FCR CSC F_AT AT 92e DEJ� ROCK AND � ���Y� a�afl� Oa�� y I SIX -VA 92] 10 1�2ir +4WIS 4a� �I I i t 3 I d 'T- e i1'pp 0C �gyp. ■ 1 '� — r■i�. 1 � e — �N mm ® '■ ■ ■ 1 ■ L SOT L ' � 1 me � ■ L ■ • a. ■ 1. T7,%0\ 1 I� 1 1 ■ r= 1 L IL G 'M 1 1 1 �� �.■■ �■r r �r ■ II � 1 °I ■� � ti 1 � r � r 1 fir■ ■ ■ 'mrP - � '"r � - ■ uW ii MJiiM -�iiM ii■■-=M I50"ii. i�!�-Mii W M �L Staff reviewed the two possible plat layouts for the site and considered individual driveways off of Fox Hollow. Staff believes that the best option from a safety and environmental standpoint is the private street option. The option of all the lots accessing directly from Fox Hollow with three separate driveways is not recommended from a safety standpoint. Each of the separate accesses creates a potential conflict point with traffic on Fox Hollow Drive, adjacent to a collector street. The second option of a public street and cul-de-sac serving the parcel requires additional grading of the site. The final option of a private street serving three lots is the most environmentally friendly with minimal tree removal. It removes the existing access off of Highway 101 and allows the site to develop. Staff is recommending approval of the private street. VARIANCE FINDINGS Sec.18-22.Variances. The city council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 12 of 16 VARIANCE FINDINGS WITHIN SUBDIVISONS The city may grant a variance from the regulations of the subdivision ordinance as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. Finding: The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. The proposed private street preserves site features. 2) The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. Finding: The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape and topographical conditions of the land. Current access is gained off of Highway 101. They proposed layout will eliminate this access point and redirect it to the private street. 3) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property. Finding: The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other properties due to the unique site features. 4) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. Finding: The granting of a variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance, and comprehensive plan. The applicant is proposing to access the site via a private street. This option will minimize grading and tree removal as well as provide less potential conflict with vehicles on Highway 101. The applicant's request is reasonable. Staff is recommending approval of this request. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Planning Case 07-03 for Fox Hill Subdivision for 3 lots with variances to allow a private street as shown on the plans dated received December 1, 2006, subject to the following conditions: A minimum of two 2'/z-inch deciduous, overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 13 of 16 2. No more than one-third of the required trees may be from any one species. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits around all trees proposed to be preserved prior to any grading. 4. Any trees proposed for preservation that are lost due to grading and construction activities will be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 5. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided to the City so it can be reviewed by the Carver Soil and Water Conservation District. 6. The plans shall be revised to incorporate Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control, including 5300, 5301, 5302A and 5302D. 7. In order to ensure that the proposed infiltration area functions properly, the contractor shall minimize the number of equipment trips across this part of the site. Additionally, the lightest equipment appropriate for the job shall be used. Once the infiltration area is graded, the easement area shall be fenced off so no further compaction occurs. The applicant may want to consider planting native shrubs, grasses and wildflowers within the infiltration area instead of sod to promote volume reduction through infiltration and evapotranspiration. 8. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the infiltration area shall be provided. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail shall be included in the plan. 9. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3 :1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 10. The plans shall be revised to show a rock construction entrance (minimum 75 feet in length) off Fox Hollow Drive. The rock construction entrance shall be constructed in accordance with Chanhassen's Standard Detail 5301. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. 11. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $8,450. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 14 of 16 12. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Site Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Carver County, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. 13. Full park fees in lieu of parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. 14. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. d. Separate sewer and water services must be provided to each lot. e. Any existing wells and on -site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 15. Fire Marshal conditions: a. Add an additional fire hydrant at the intersection of Fox Hollow Drive and Fox Hollow Court. b. A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed at street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota fire Code Section 501.4. d. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. e. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 15 of 16 16. All existing buildings, driveways and accessory structures must be removed before grading commences. 17. Submit calculations of storm sewer and N URP showing that the development meets the requirements of the City and the MPCA. Determine the new HWL for the existing pond and show it on the plan along with the NWL. 18. The swales on the eastern side of Lot 2, between Lots 2 and 3, and the swale west of Lot 3 must have a 2% minimum slope. Also, the swales in the northwest corner of the house of Lot 1, back yard of Lot 2, and side yard of Lot 3 should be moved away from the foundations of the structures. Plantings shall be placed outside the swales to promote drainage. Add spot elevations at the building corners of Lot 1. 19. A valley gutter shall be installed at the intersection of Fox Hollow Drive and the private street to convey water through the intersection. Also, provide spot elevations on the curb to ensure curb line has a minimum slope of 0.5%. 20. The proposed storm line connecting to the existing storm sewer shows a bend without a structure. A structure will be required at all bends of storm sewer. Maintain 18 inches of separation between the sanitary sewer and drain tile. 21. On the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, show: a) Private street and driveway grades shall not exceed 10%. b) Ground (i.e. non -paved) surface grades shall not be less than 2%. c) Emergency overflow locations and elevations must be shown on the plan. d) Add bottom elevations to the retaining walls. 22. An easement is required from the appropriate property owner for any off -site grading. 23. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 24. Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 25. All sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer within this site shall be publicly owned and maintained. 26. The watermain extension from Fox Hollow Drive must be wet -tapped. Due to the alignment of the watermain in Fox Hollow Drive, it appears that this connection cannot be done under traffic. The sanitary sewer connection on Fox Hollow Drive connecting to an existing stub shall also be completed under traffic. Fox Hill Subdivision Planning Case 07-03 January 2, 2007 Page 16 of 16 27. Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer lines. The actual elevations of existing utilities shall be determined. 28. Install cleanout for the sewer service for Lot 2 due to length. 29. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,669 for sanitary sewer and $4,485 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 30. The utilities will need to be adjusted to allow a minimum of 10 feet horizontal separation between the easement and the proposed utilities. 31. A 10-foot drainage and utility easement will be required for the front of Lots 2 and 3. 32. The private street entrance must connect to Fox Hollow drive at a 90-degree angle. 33. Lot 3, Block 1, must maintain a 20-foot side yard setback along the westerly property line. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Application. 3. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing 4. Plans Dated December 1, 2006. g:\plan\2007 planning cases\07-03 fox hill\staff report pc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Fox Hill Subdivision — Planning Case 07-03 On January 2, 2007, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary Plat to Subdivide a 1.69 Acre Lot into Three (3) single-family Lots, Fox Hill Subdivision. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned RSF, Single -Family Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Low Density (1.2 — 4.0 units per net acre). The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2. Lack of adequate roads. 3. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 5. The planning report Planning Case 07-03, dated January 2, 2007, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with Variances. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 2nd day of January, 2007. CHANHAS SEN PLANNING COMMISSION I:• Jerry McDonald, Chairman 2 That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 628.3 feet south of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West at right angles 260.05 feet; thence South at right angles 335.0 feet; thence East at right angles 260.05 feet to said East line; thence North along said East line 335.0 feet to the point of beginning. 3 CiTY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name and Address: 1 D r%l21 hl i?�da�1 St 5Tar�tCj crE'�u Q2. siz. /za G A>.1 S E. � ri )7 Contact: 5c-o7 i' Phone:g Sz- zt5' V53.F Fax: ctS2-242•-401.6 Email: s�v1-T-c� id5t7tZrrticl.c©ram Planning Case No. 0­7 - 6 Owner Name and Address: Gl-fie4lZ��S !{t1rt���.H�Tz e- ItAru 14Ar SSEty P'r Jy S S3 17 Contact: Phone: Fax: Email: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, Including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review (SPR)* Subdivision* Vacation of Rlght-of-Way/Easements (VAC) Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign - $200 (City to install and remove) X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost" - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be Invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/z" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (*Alf) format. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: 6520 c—U& ,40 5cc N D 5-144, (ic�SSNN ,C'tt�1 S�317 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: P t n SOS I� �-no TOTAL ACREAGE: -- WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING: tZ651 StNee-c REQUESTED ZONING: 17-(s rnErctle'e-- 5:1I1&t-C r—A(-t1 PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: 5 U-3 D r Lr i r7 C I t-1 TO '3 S t N G L E FA M 1 L Y E-Fd cl/t L o i 5 This application must be completed In full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all Information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencles shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This Is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed In my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself Informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc, with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and Information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. �►� (- v Signature of Applicant /o sP(z-)t c 1t�rn� $. , �J4G Date Signature of Fee O er c 4Arz-try g Date G:\ptANVorms\Development Review Appllcetion.DOG Rev. 12i05 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 21, 2006, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for FOX HILL — Planning Case 07-03 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. K.n J. En 0 ardt, puty Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this Z) day of Zbecem bnr , 2006. Notary Pu is KIryTs.icnb"W!"" NotmMliC-einnes ta MOMExpirMJan 31o2010yC Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 2, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for for Subdivision of property into three (3) single - Proposal: family lots with Variances on property zoned Residential Single Family — FOX HILL Applicant: 10 Spring Homes, Inc. Property 6570 Chanhassen Road Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens Public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1 • Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/07-03.html. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen Questions & AI-Jaff by email at saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone Comments: at 952-227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, January 2, 2007 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for for Subdivision of property into three (3) single - Proposal: family lots with Variances on property zoned Residential Single Family— OX HILL Applicant: 10 Spring Homes, Inc. Property 6570 Chanhassen Road Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens Public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/07-03.html. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen Questions & AI-Jaff by email at saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone Comments: at 952-227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227.1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Fox Hill Planning Case No. 07-03 City of Chanhassen 0 asant View Road Pleasant View Road Pleasant View Road Joseph Curve �a Of °+ a LL o m e Y Drive �a ou Hollow Drive m 0 co �e T of C Joseph Curve �o m i �o� o c 'p m r OX c y n ou w Broadmoore Drive Foxtail CO o O Li-F O F r Gray °+ Cu SUBJECT Har PROPERTY aG Of dF oT d, Lotus L ke 0 JASON P & TONIA R ASHLINE CLAUDIA M STEPHAN ORHAN A & PATRICIA J UNER 10 FOX HOLLOW DR 100 FOX HOLLOW DR 110 FOX HOLLOW DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9252 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9254 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9254 RICHARD A & RHONDA G HERR KEVIN & CHERYL PETERSON ROBERT & EDNA PETERSON 120 FOX HOLLOW DR 150 BLUFF RIDGE CT 160 BLUFF RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9254 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9251 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9251 NORA JANEL KIRKWOLD & DAVID B ROBINSON BROOK S BOLESTA & 20 FOX HOLLOW DR 25 PLEASANT VIEW RD 30 FOX HOLLOW DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9252 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9439 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9252 MARK A & WAI-MING T HENDERSON ROGUE L SWENSON JR & CONSTANCE M KEEFE 31 FOX HOLLOW DR PO BOX 1147 35 PLEASANT VIEW RD 40 FOX HOLLOW DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-1147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9439 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9252 JEFFEEY B & CYNTHIA S HALL EDGEWATER DEVELOPMENT MARIA VANDERZANDEN 41 FOX HOLLOW DR GROUP 50 HUNTERS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9256 4900 EDGEWATER DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9243 MOUND, MN 55364-2008 UNE VUE GARY J & VICTORIA G ALEXANDER STEVEN W & KELLY K LEN 527 MAIN ST NW 55 PLEASANT VIEW RD 60 HUNTERS CT COON RAPIDS, MN 55448-1528 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9439 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9243 JAMES M THEIS BLAINE O JOHNSON & DENNIS W & CHRISTINA HANSEN 6400 CHANHASSEN RD 6441 PLEASANT VIEW CIR 6450 PLEASANT VIEW CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8575 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9531 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9531 JAMES & JOYCE NICHOLLS KHAMPHENG XIONG MICHAEL D DOUGLAS & 6451 PLEASANT VIEW CIR 6460 FOX DR 65 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9531 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4590 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9439 JEFFREY J & DIANE L BROWN JUDY SUNDERLAND STEVEN R & ALYSSA D PETRIE 6500 GRAY FOX CRV 6502 GRAY FOX CRV 6503 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9244 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9244 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 TROY D & BETH EMERSON KATHY ANNE STUDER & SIM K & RY SOK SIMONS 6504 GRAY FOX CRV 6505 GRAY FOX CRV 6506 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9244 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9244 ELBERT A GINKEL IDRISS M ELBEKRAOUI & JEFFREY R & TERESE C KRULIK 6507 GRAY FOX CRV 6508 GRAY FOX CRV 6509 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9244 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 ROBERTA BROUGHTON 6510 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9244 DANIEL P & ANNETTE M MAXWELL 6513 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 JAMES E & HEATHER K LEE 6519 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 STEPHEN J MACHACEK & 6521 QUAIL XING CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9249 CHRISTINE A MCKENZIE 6531 QUAIL XING CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9249 KRISTINA VILLONES 6550 QUAIL XING CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9248 DAVID F WANEK 70 HUNTERS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9243 DANIEL J BUJOLD 80 HUNTERS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9243 JEFFREY P & RONDA M SEILER 6511 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 JILL A RODNING 6515 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 JAMES WALKER & PAMELA ORR 6520 QUAIL XING CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9248 LISA R GRATZ 6523 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 DAVID E & SHARON T TUPPER 6540 QUAIL XING CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9248 CHARLES R KLINGELHUTZ & 6570 CHANHASSEN RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9511 VALLEYVIEW DEVELOPMENT LLC 7264 LAKE RIDGE DR SAVAGE, MN 55378-2276 JOHN P & KIMBERLEE A GUILFOIL 90 HUNTERS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9243 LANCE A FLANNERY 6512 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9244 SCOTT A & SUSAN T MITCHELL 6517 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 THOMAS L & JUDITH A NEWHOUSE 6521 GRAY FOX CRV CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9247 JOSEPH JR & KELLY J FERNANDES 6530 QUAIL XING CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9248 DAVID J PETERSON 6541 QUAIL XING CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9249 GRAYCE A FLOM 6590 CHANHASSEN RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9511 ANDREW DONAT 7651 172ND LN NW ANOKA, MN 55303-3536 BERNARD R & STACY L TRENDA CHRISTIAN S VITALE CHRISTOPHER & ROXANNE COTE 6496 BRACKETT RD 19143 JOSEPH CUR 19127 BROADMOORE DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 D J LHOTKA/L R THOMPSON DAVID C & KELLY S SCHACHT DAVID RETZLAFF & ERIN AHOLA 19158 JOSEPH CURVE 19155 JOSEPH CURVE 19080 BROADMOORE DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 DIAN M & TERRANCE J REINKALL DUNG T & TRI D NGUYEN DUWAYNE A & ANN E BRANDT 19119 JOSEPH CURVE 19116 JOSEPH CUR 19176 BROADMOORE DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 E H& P M SCHAEFER EDWARD J MUEHLBERG EDWARD L& JOAN L BECKER 19044 JOSEPH CURVE 19200 BROADMOORE DR 19131 JOSEPH CURVE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 ELIZABETH J BANK ERIC PRZYBILLA FRANK A & MAUREEN S BERTHOLD 19151 BROADMOORE DR 6448 BRACKETT RD 6484 BRACKETT RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 JAMES & CHERYL GAEBEL JAMES J BRENNAN JEFFREY & SAMANTHA SCHMIDT 19056 JOSEPH CURVE 19197 PLEASANTVIEW RD 19128 BROADMOORE DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 JOHN ERVIN IVERSON JOSEPH & MARY WROBLEWSKI KAKIT CHEUNG & XIAOMAN LI 19152 BROADMOORE DR 19080 JOSEPH CURVE 19068 JOSEPH CUR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 KIRK MARSH LEON J & KATHY J TERSTEEG LINDA J RICHARDS 19175 BROADMOORE DR 6460 BRACKETT RD 3635 JAMES AVE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 DEEPHAVEN MN 55391 LORALEE J IVERSON M A PETERSON & L M PETERSON M STRODEL 19169 PLEASANTVIEW RD 19104 JOSEPH CURVE 6610 LOCHANBURN RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 MARIA TWIGG MARY JOAN GRIFFITHS MATHIAS R STRODEL 19140 JOSEPH CUR 19128 JOSEPH CUR 6610 LOCHANBURN RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 MICHAEL G & JEAN M NEILL MONTE E & JEANETTE M NESS PATRICK J & JOY D SHEEHAN 19170 JOSEPH CUR 6472 BRACKETT RD 19152 JOSEPH CURVE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 PHILLIP A CAMP 19176 JOSEPH CURVE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 ROBERT & TRACY PETERSON 19107 JOSEPH CURVE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 SCOTT R & DEBORAH L STEVENS 19164 JOSEPH CUR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 STEVEN R BRACHMAN SUYING CHEN & SHIRLEY CHEN WILLIAM & VERONICA THEOBALD DEBRALYNN GEARY 19092 JOSEPH CURVE 19199 BROADMOORE DR 19180 DUCK LAKE TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: CHARLES KLINGELHUTZ SURVEYED: May, 2006 DRAFTED: August 28, 2006 REVISED: October 31, 2006 to show very preliminary 3 lot concept with private street. REVISED: November 1, 2006 to add possible future homes and proposed contours, still very preliminary REVISED: November 3, 2006 for submission, runoff and hardcover calculations to follow Monday morning. REVISED: November 29, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs markup of plan. REVISED: November 30, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs final comments. SURVEY OF: 6570 Chanhassen Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 628.3 feet south of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West at right angles 260.05 feet; thence South at right angles 335.0 feet; thence East at right angles 260.05 feet to said East line; thence North along said East line 335.0 feet to the point of beginning. LIMITATIONS & NOTES: 1. The scope of our services for this job is as follows: Preparing a preliminary plat for your review and for review by the City of Chanhassen and other governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over your proposal. This version is preliminary pending a preapplication consultation required by Sec. 18-38 of Chanhassen's ordinances. 2. The client has had us show the setback from the north line of Lots 2 and 3 as 30 feet, a front setback, under the language of the ordinance, but asks that the City consider whether the intent of the ordinance would be better met by considering the north lines of these lots as side lines and the east line of the roadway easement as the front line. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " • " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, if "o" is filled in, then denotes found iron monument. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Engineerfessional Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. q-u� I 1 s H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 LEGEND . _ i2b _ _ Denol<x cuxnng conbw li,c 934 0 , proposed line 934.5 Denote pmpoxed pd el aeon a. Denotes di—i-ofp w—l—i web. now N..-pin,o drill fence per ayapccifiwtiom sue- N..- proposed senibry sewer li. _y_ Denntea p,,No dwebr One ST IN—. pmpoxd drain Ele li. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FOX HILL �� 'T, I vv i �.v '------ „ prim w r;; wcmn w�.s FOX' HOLLOW �- s �s s s, .o.wrwtr ewwn or we MVKUr j I I " / ' A / I , — --------------- Vel .wF" alaw --------- .' p I I }yJ � 1 — 1 c ____- 1 ,•,� � ' — ' Ate. '� S '�• - -- az------ _ 1 •- I I . , I __ -------p2� '1 GRAPHIC SCALE /I 30 0 as 30 60 - (a veer) I 0 ) ___-__ - _----� I I DRAWING NO. 061130 EXISTING CONDITIONS, SHEET 1 OF 9 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: CHARLES KLINGELHUTZ SURVEYED: May, 2006 DRAFTED: August 28, 2006 REVISED: October 31, 2006 to show very preliminary 3 lot concept with private street. REVISED: November 1, 2006 to add possible future homes and proposed contours, still very preliminary REVISED: November 3, 2006 for submission, runoff and hardcover calculations to follow Monday morning. REVISED: November 29, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs markup of plan. REVISED: November 30, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs final comments. SURVEY OF: 6570 Chanhassen Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 628.3 feet south of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West at right angles 260.05 feet; thence South at right angles 335.0 feet; thence East at right angles 260.05 feet to said East line; thence North along said East line 335.0 feet to the point of beginning. LIMITATIONS & NOTES: 1. The scope of our services for this job is as follows: Preparing a preliminary plat for your review and for review by the City of Chanhassen and other governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over your proposal. This version is preliminary pending a preapplication consultation required by Sec. 18-38 of Chanhassen's ordinances. 2. The client has had us show the setback from the north line of Lots 2 and 3 as 30 feet, a front setback, under the language of the ordinance, but asks that the City consider whether the intent of the ordinance would be better met by considering the north lines of these lots as side lines and the east line of the roadway easement as the front line. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " • " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, if "o" is filled in, then denotes found iron monument. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Enggineer d a Professional Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. OH am s H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 LEGEND �nnr.,.�.fin8�newfiM 934 ocwu.PmPn d nnmwen 934.5� M..-—Wrd.px,L nm 1k.... d-fi..of pnposd awn.—Ouw N..—. P.P..Jsill tents"Ciry. 'fis.m— p.,.d vnit.ry swcr line — W — 1x�rc. P.npu.ca w.�r Iiz ST N-111 Pr N-d dr.in ck fins PROPOSED EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES ARE SHOWN THUS: (------+-------- I i BEING 5 FEET WOE ON ALL LOT LINES EXCEPT ON THOSE LOT LINES WHICH ABUT STREETS WHERE THEY ARE 10 FEET WDE. I s I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT OF i i FOX HILL d_ GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 1S 30 60 ( IN FI= I � I / W W — W a.rn r W-W w 4 MOM w.s— : — S—: S Ism .0 \ .dddIoa— \ I i / U / / W O / W O 1 1 Z W v n m 1 _L 11 1 r 1 1 \ 11 11 1 1 A --4314 0 a W.41 Corti W o[ 1Q,T MT pMeO OF =tI L T.l 114, r4 L n� 1T1 Il-r vvlL.v1 ffOLLOIY 1--259.85 (MEAS.) 260.05 (DESC.) S 89'42'14" E-- .�r . 14a70 —1-- - — — - 30 / M290.0. IL TOTAL I n/ 1&067 W iL C 01 Rood E--t it r / I --------------J r . W 1 R: 30 1 I r IW O = O IgW xl 1 i I "� L — .3-2.o—o — 23.305 .a IL TOTAL g 19.372 *% 1L L o1 Rood Ea.. t < 1 10 I I W Z W I � O I I ------------------- 1� a� r W I W I 23.112 .a. IL �' I W I - � L------------------�- s1 Si sM22 I L---------------- --260.22 (MEAS.)-- --260.05 (DESC.)-- S 89'41'24' E 1P \ 1 0 Li DRAWING NO.061130 LOT LAYOUT, SHEET 2 OF 9 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: CHARLES KLINGELHUTZ SURVEYED: May, 2006 DRAFTED: August 28, 2006 REVISED: October 31, 2006 to show very preliminary 3 lot concept with private street. REVISED: November 1, 2006 to add possible future homes and proposed contours, still very preliminary REVISED: November 3, 2006 for submission, runoff and hardcover calculations to follow Monday morning. REVISED: November 29, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs markup of plan. REVISED: November 30, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs final comments. SURVEY OF: 6570 Chanhassen Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 628.3 feet south of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West at right angles 260.05 feet; thence South at right angles 335.0 feet; thence East at right angles 260.05 feet to said East line; thence North along said East line 335.0 feet to the point of beginning. LIMITATIONS & NOTES: 1. The scope of our services for this job is as follows: Preparing a preliminary plat for your review and for review by the City of Chanhassen and other governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over your proposal. This version is preliminary pending a preapplication consultation required by Sec. 18-38 of Chanhassen's ordinances. 2. The client has had us show the setback from the north line of Lots 2 and 3 as 30 feet, a front setback, under the language of the ordinance, but asks that the City consider whether the intent of the ordinance would be better met by considering the north lines of these lots as side lines and the east line of the roadway easement as the front line. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: • Denotes 1/2 ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, if orr is filled in, then denotes found iron monument. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Enggijneer d a Professional Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. OH 1 (�)WAan_ am s H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 LEGEND ._y,y. __ Dcnams costing wnlom lire 994 Denotes pmposcd wnmur lire 934.5 ---_ D-- pmpud arnl.i— ..ss D--, di —lion ofp.,.d slum—gow —SF Denotes pn,pwdsill (cote peg City s ifi.fi— Denotes proposed ssnitey sewer lire —y— D—.-prop—d—lire Sf N-,. p,.ws d drsin ule lire PROPOSED EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES ARE SHOWN THUS: r-------------- i BEING 5 FEET WIDE ON ALL LOT LINES EXCEPT ON THOSE LOT LINES WHICH ABUT STREETS WHERE THEY ARE 10 FEET WIDE. S I PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FOX i HILL I II i .rw . orur •oti�.sr GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 IN rEET ) \ ELEV.. 22&4 L EO Y \ T �mw� rvc=.ar �yy -i i 82 ii ormf— ` r �r i Will \ 1 '\ Ypp^agyp EL ELEK 0 fu1 Y.O.SO `\ ---- --4- 1 1 A 1 �r 1 W. `- 1 a rnn.Atr cam" w M ,grm"T ou.■o o Acx x r.E rr6 1111111116 ,., II W ---------------------- W lop — ..% — •� ---�. - W 1 1 ,`, A1•"" -"'" ,~ 'r36--_____ A1'V' Ours lErlE( , W ' �- 1 a22 7/3 osim Willi1YEp �M 1/3o" W - 1- t.Or W. q W M4 AWED rosa.IIo ne R.r .r s1. 1 M ru .aol uo nlor r.a.E b2 I / I W DRAWING NO.061130 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN, SHEET 3 OF 9 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: CHARLES KLINGELHUTZ SURVEYED: May, 2006 DRAFTED: August 28, 2006 REVISED: October 31, 2006 to show very preliminary 3 lot concept with private street. REVISED: November 1, 2006 to add possible future homes and proposed contours, still very preliminary REVISED: November 3, 2006 for submission, runoff and hardcover calculations to follow Monday morning. REVISED: November 29, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs markup of plan. REVISED: November 30, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs final comments. SURVEY OF: 6570 Chanhassen Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 628.3 feet south of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West at right angles 260.05 feet; thence South at right angles 335.0 feet; thence East at right angles 260.05 feet to said East line; thence North along said East line 335.0 feet to the point of beginning. LIMITATIONS & NOTES: 1. The scope of our services for this job is as follows: Preparing a preliminary plat for your review and for review by the City of Chanhassen and other governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over your proposal. This version is preliminary pending a preapplication consultation required by Sec. 18-38 of Chanhassen's ordinances. 2. The client has had us show the setback from the north line of Lots 2 and 3 as 30 feet, a front setback, under the language of the ordinance, but asks that the City consider whether the intent of the ordinance would be better met by considering the north lines of these lots as side lines and the east line of the roadway easement as the front line. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: Denotes 1/2 1f ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, if o11 is filled in, then denotes found iron monument. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Engineer a Professional Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. I I , 'Q1 L, am s H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 LEGEND Detrotcs e[is1n8 conbm lira 934 D—,, proposed wntow lim 934.5--_ Derote,proposed pots .fon Denote, direction of proposd —.eler 0— — SF Denotes proposed silt fence per City s ifwtio.. Ste— Deiwla proposed—ilq, line y— Denotes proposed —fro ST Denote, proposed deem file lim PROPOSED EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES ARE SHOWN THUS: 0. r----- 1------- I I BEING 5 FEET WIDE ON ALL LOT LINES EXCEPT ON THOSE LOT LINES WHICH ABUT STREETS WHERE THEY ARE 10 FEET MADE. I s i I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FOX HILL GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 19 30 60 IN PE6T A 19 / — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —i 1 I I I I DRAWING NO.061130 UTILITY & SURFACING PLAN, SHEET 4 OF 9 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: CHARLES KLINGELHUTZ SURVEYED: May, 2006 DRAFTED: August 28, 2006 REVISED: October 31, 2006 to show very preliminary 3 lot concept with private street. REVISED: November 1, 2006 to add possible future homes and proposed contours, still very preliminary REVISED: November 3, 2006 for submission, runoff and hardcover calculations to follow Monday morning. REVISED: November 29, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs markup of plan. REVISED: November 30, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs final comments. SURVEY OF: 6570 Chanhassen Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 628.3 feet south of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West at right angles 260.05 feet; thence South at right angles 335.0 feet; thence East at right angles 260.05 feet to said East line; thence North along said East line 335.0 feet to the point of beginning. LIMITATIONS & NOTES: 1. The scope of our services for this job is as follows: Preparing a preliminary plat for your review and for review by the City of Chanhassen and other governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over your proposal. This version is preliminary pending a preapplication consultation required by Sec. 18-38 of Chanhassen's ordinances. 2. The client has had us show the setback from the north line of Lots 2 and 3 as 30 feet, a front setback, under the language of the ordinance, but asks that the City consider whether the intent of the ordinance would be better met by considering the north lines of these lots as side lines and the east line of the roadway easement as the front line. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " • " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, if "o" is filled in, then denotes found iron monument. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Engineer d a Professional Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. I 1 �u am s H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 LEGEND I)—, existing conbm lire 934 D—,Mm wdw—liw 934.5� D»»np�w.apwan.d» 0. D..—di—fi.. fp�,.dao» SF — D—. pmpo dvIt f—, per Citys ific i.m —S— D--pmpo d—i,ary—lin — W — Denotes pm d »,ter tiro ST D.— M,.d drain 61. li. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOX OF i i HILL __ ' GRAPHIC SCALE w o Ts 30 60 (�FUT) 1 11 n 1 �r 1\ \ \ 11 I I �1 A W� I I v �--- ---------------1 I \ I I I 1 DRAWING NO.061130 HARDCOVER, SHEET 5 OF 9 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: CHARLES KLINGELHUTZ SURVEYED: May, 2006 DRAFTED: August 28, 2006 REVISED: October 31, 2006 to -show very preliminary 3 lot concept with private street. REVISED: November 1, 2006 to add possible future homes and proposed contours, still very preliminary REVISED: November 3, 2006 for submission, runoff and hardcover calculations to follow Monday morning. REVISED: November 29, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs markup of plan. REVISED: November 30, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs final comments. SURVEY OF: 6570 Chanhassen Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 628.3 feet south of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West at right angles 260.05 feet; thence South at right angles 335.0 feet; thence East at right angles 260.05 feet to said East line; thence North along said East line 335.0 feet to the point of beginning. LIMITATIONS & NOTES: 1. The scope of our services for this job is as follows: Preparing a preliminary plat for your review and for review by the City of Chanhassen and other governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over your proposal. This version is preliminary pending a preapplication consultation required by Sec. 18-38 of Chanhassen's ordinances. 2. The client has had us show the setback from the north line of Lots 2 and 3 as 30 feet, a front setback, under the language of the ordinance, but asks that the City consider whether the intent of the ordinance would be better met by considering the north lines of these lots as side lines and the east line of the roadway easement as the front line. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " • " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, if "o" is filled in, then denotes found iron monument. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Engineer d a Professional Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. I I �u am s H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 LEGEND .-y26 Dc.ok iAine­1iz 934 D..W. pmp.d—fim 934.5� Dc- pmw.d wt6-6- ..- Dcn d.—fi.. of pmpo.vd--flow D—W, pmp .d tilt fe . p<r City s ifiwti u S— Dawks rmpos<a-��ik.y:waliM — V— Dcnoms pmpoaed wakrliro ST Nem pm dd., 61, Gm PRELIMINARY PLAT OF i FOX HILL / / n.�rs4atoorse�e EXISTING N. WATERSHED 148+1035 - 1183 sq. ft. or 0.027 Acres impervious 39510 — 1183 - 38326 94 It. or 0.880 Acres gross Weighted overage C - 0.38 as calculated below. M35 x .880 - 0.308 0.37 x .907 - 0.334 L - 273 feel n - 0.4 (posture or overage gross) s-(930.3-923.5)/273 - 0.025 tc - 17 minutes 010- CiA - .37 x 5.65 x 0.907 - 1.90cfs 0, 00 - .38 x 6.35 x 0.907 - 2.13cfs EMSTING S. WATERSHED 148+1351 - 1499 sq. ft. or 0.034 Acres impervious 34205 — 1499 - 32706 sq. ft. or 0.751 Acres gross Weighted overage C . 0.38 as calculated below. 0.35 x .751 - 0.263 0.38 x .785 - M296 L - 246 feet n - 0.4 (posture or average gross) s-(930.3-923.7)/246 - 0.027 lc - 16.5 minutes 010-MA-.38x4.50x0.785- 1.34cfs 0100 - .38 x 6.50 x 0.785 - 1.94cfs GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 1s 30 60 ( IN FRET ) •o T corn a, .[ Wun l cum%* or KcL L ra I 81 L W n Ld C� O U AM1M1 ' \ ----------------- ----------------------------------- DRAWING NO. 061130 EXISTING WATERSHEDS, SHEET 6 OF 9 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: CHARLES KLINGELHUTZ SURVEYED: May, 2006 DRAFTED: August 28, 2006 REVISED: October 31, 2006 to show very preliminary 3 lot concept with private street. REVISED: November 1, 2006 to add possible future homes and proposed contours, still very preliminary REVISED: November 3, 2006 for submission, runoff and hardcover calculations to follow Monday morning. REVISED: November 29, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs markup of plan. REVISED: November 30, 2006 to revise plan per City staffs final comments. SURVEY OF: 6570 Chanhassen Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 628.3 feet south of the Northeast corner thereof, thence West at right angles 260.05 feet; thence South at right angles 335.0 feet; thence East at right angles 260.05 feet to said East line; thence North along said East line 335.0 feet to the point of beginning. LIMITATIONS & NOTES: 1. The scope of our services for this job is as follows: Preparing a preliminary plat for your review and for review by the City of Chanhassen and other governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over your proposal. This version is preliminary pending a preapplication consultation required by Sec. 18-38 of Chanhassen's ordinances. 2. The client has had us show the setback from the north line of Lots 2 and 3 as 30 feet, a front setback, under the language of the ordinance, but asks that the City consider whether the intent of the ordinance would be better met by considering the north lines of these lots as side lines and the east line of the roadway easement as the front line. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: • Denotes 1/2 ,1 ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, if o'1 is filled in, then denotes found iron monument. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Engineer d a Professional Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. PMAVU4 °H 6140� am s H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 LEGEND __I— -- D<-oms eunigm lira 'i954 Dcn p.po dm .Im 934.5� Denaerp,M. d.pnlarre a. D<.oI<sai�eo.orpr,.posed-,rm-.mrn<. — SF Denotespmpoxd ult f<n<e per Ciry specificemm — S — Dcnol<s pmp .d..ni.v s:w<r h- W— 13 m1-proposedwai Iu. ST Ne ,purposed drain W, lim PROPOSED EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES ARE SHOWN THUS. o ----- 1------- i I 1 BEING 5 FEET WIDE ON ALL LOT LINES 1 EXCEPT ON THOSE LOT LINES WHICH ABUT 1 STREETS WHERE THEY ARE 10 FEET MADE. I s I . 1 I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT OF I FOX PROPOSED N. WATERSHED 7749 s4 It. or 0.175 Acres impervious (house, deck drive,street, rat..olls) 28630 - 7749 - 20881 sq. It. or 0.479 Acres gross Weighted overage C - 0.51 as calculated below 0.35 x .479 - 0.168 0.51 x .657 - 0.337 L - 348 feet n - 0.4 (posture or overage grosS) s-(930-924)/348 - 0.017 le - 20 minutes O10-CiA-.51 x4.10x 0.657 - 1.37 cis 0100 - .51 x 5.90 x 0.657 - 1.97 cis I HILL PROPOSED S. WATERSHED 9.871 s4 ft. impervious or 0.227 Acres 35525 - 9871 - 25755 s4 It. or 0.591 Acres gross Weighted overage C - 0.52 as calculated below 0.35 x .591 - 0.207 0.52 x .818 - 0.423 L - 365 feet n - 0.4 (posture or overage gross) s-(930-924)/385 - 0.016 lc - 22 minutes 010- CIA -.52x3.73x0.818- 1.59cis 0100 - .52 x 5.30 x 0.818 - 2.25 c f s 1.94/2.25 X 5.3 - 4.57 IN/HR AFTER 7 MINUTES 7 MIN. X 60 SEC/MIN X (2.25-1.94) X 1/2 - 65 CU. FT. REQUIRED STORAGE 2570 PROVIDED GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 1s 30 60 ( D1 IRE? ) � I I I -J / W _ W rrrxre r m or r erase --a. � T ♦♦♦ zMsml�]wlr.e=wr ♦ I ♦♦ e \ Pv, . trSO I EIEv. - wx.s L 10 r ♦ ♦\ / Y.1.00 / I aua ti \ \ 3 �Sir PM 2.25 ELEV. 93,. \S[rl 1 \\\ 4 11 1 1 mr • W. mt -�. - a,rs- 4 � / wwrf r ruaea 0r a[ >011 T a,"We Or Kcf. % rax Ile, am I -------------WI I \Lrk\ -291 {c----t_� 91f► - - •�� ,- � I / = •� ) a—IrOC��r_ ` L 1 raorotm r a.r I -- I` arxa„•ell-x. -- ]]M91m L11a YlED -M 1/3 T r0 Y] ] W .D >gOEO M rut aTol -o rats r.s•C ' SM%1= M r0 0t7 - 2070 N. rw" �I A1�• ----------------------- / II ♦-----------------------------------� C211 O DRAWING NO.061130 PROPOSED WATERSHEDS, SHEET 7 OF 9', ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: CHARLES KLINGELHUTZ SURVEYED: May, 2006 DRAFTED: June 2, 2006 REVISED: June 8, 2006 to show Outlot "A" at City staffs suggestion. SURVEY OF: 6570 Chanhassen Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 116, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 628.3 feet south of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West at right angles 260.05 feet; thence South at right angles 335.0 feet; thence East at right angles 260.05 feet to said East line; thence North along said East line 335.0 feet to the point of beginning. LIMITATIONS & NOTES: The scope of our services for this job is as follows: 1. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important. 2. Showing the topography of the site by contour lines and by spot elevations. 3. Showing a preliminary proposal to divide the property into 3 lots and build a roadway and utility systems to serve the three lots, for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies as may have jurisdiction over your proposal. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: Denotes 1/2III ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, if oII is filled in, then denotes found iron monument. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Engineer and a Professional Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. AAOA °H POJA�� am s H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 LEGEND --93E--- Denotes <risling umbut liM 934 934.5 \—, a�w <a w els .em �. Dem-di—u...f p.,�.d wwsn water flow N— proposed silt f— p , City spxifiranom VARIANCE FREE PLAT OF i i FOX HILL GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 Is 30 60 IN ru-r I I � � � _v --: ---: p.Ca! CO W K M.Cal O NAM2 OI KC% % IM IM. Olp tl ------ `---------------------------------J t:1 0 C� 0 DRAWING NO. 061130 VARIANCE FREE PLAT, SHEET 8 OF 9 SYM G2TY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME INSTALLED HGT. / ROOT ROOT BALL / GAL. SPECIFIEDGOND GONT. SIZE COMMENTS + PROPOSED SHADE TREE 0 DECIDUOUS TREES A 8 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE I Aoer X freemanii 'Jeffer5red 2.5" GAL. B$B 40" MIN. DIA. HEALTHY PULL 1 + B 25 JAPANESE TREE LILACI S rin a reticulate 1.5" GAL. I BsB 36" MIN. DIA. LOCAL SPRING DU6 CONIFEROUS TREES D 1 64 BLACK SPRUCE Picea mariano 6AND 'i' HGT. B$B 56" MIN. DIA. I HEALTHY PULL EXISTING SHADE TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE PLAN LEGEND O 15, 50' (00' "= 50' LANDSCAPE LA YOUT PLAN O W O O O O O W O O O O • ADD EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IF GRADES GREATER THAN 3:1 OR IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. REFER TO MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION CONTROL. • PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR AGGREGATE BASE AND SILT FENCE. • WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF FINISHED SITE GRADING, DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD OR ROCK BASE. • CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ER05ION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES AND EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED CATCH BASINS, FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. • 3/I6" STEEL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS AND ANNUALS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS SOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. SYSTEM TO WORK WITH EXISTING PIPING ON -SITE. • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE PROPER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS AND OTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS OR SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FINAL PAY REQUEST. • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS) OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION, IRRIGATION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR • UNLE55 NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEEP/SOD PLACEMENT 15 FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. • FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING 15 GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO SEPTEMBER 15. ADJUSTMENTS TO SOD/SEED PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. • PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.I. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO 'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN V FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN &' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. • PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. PLANTING NOTES PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BID AND/OR QUOTATION. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL, OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS OR MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 5-0-20 OF 12 OZ. PER 2.5" CALIPER TREE AND 6 OZ. PER SHRUB WITH AND ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10-0-15 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. • PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS SCREENED COMPOST OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPING I" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER I AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE IF DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER • GRADING LIMITS AND LIMITS OF WORK SHOWN ON PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE AND MAY BE ADJUSTED IN FIELD BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WORK OUTSIDE OF THESE LIMITS WILL BE DONE AT LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE UNLESS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER IN WRITING. EXISTING TREES AND/OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUB MASSING5 FOUND ON SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVED OR ARE LOCATED IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED. QUESTIONS REGARDING EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL. NOTE: TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE 5TAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED; IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE - 3' 120 DEGREE INTERVALS (TYP.) 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP TYP.) TREE ARAP TO FIRST BRANCH FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE ROOTBALL TO SIT ON MOUNDED SUBGRADE. REMOVE TOP 1/5 OF BURLAP FROM ROOTBALL. ORGANIC MULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE SPEC PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC. TOPSOIL 5UBGRADE 2" X 2" X 24" WOOD STAKE SET AT ANGLE EDGE CONDITION VARIES - SEE PLAN DRAIN SYSTEM AS REOU I RED - PER SPEC: 4" DIA. PERF. PVC PIPE WITH SOCK- PLACED IN 42" MIN. DEPTH AUGERED HOLE FILLED WITH 3/4" DIAMETER DRAIN ROCK. LOCATE AT EDGE OF ROOT BALL AS SHOWN. • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR 5HALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DE51GN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'5 LAYOUT. • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND/OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND 51TE ELEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. DAMAGE TO SAME 5HALL BE REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10'-0" CLEARANCE). • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. • UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED 50 THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND OTHER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. • ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. CHANGES IN THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. • NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. • SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WITHIN WETLAND AREA. • REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR WETLAND BOUNDARY, GRADING EXTENTS, SPOT ELEVATIONS, RETAINING WALL DATA, ETC. NOTE: NOTE: TWO ALTERNATE METH005 OF TREE 5TAKING ARE CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD ILLU5TRATED. IT 15 THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION ON HOW TO MULCH UNLE55 NOTED OTHERWI5E. NO MULCH STAKE TREES. HOWEVER, THE GONIRAGT R 15 RE5PON515LE TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. PLACE ROOT FOR BALL 50 THAT BASAL FLARE 15 I" ABOVE MAINTAINING TREE5 IN A 5URROUNDING GRADE. PLUMB P051TION THROUGHOUT THE DOUBLE 5TRAND 14 GA. WIRE - 3' ® 120 WARRANTY PERIOD. y L DEGREE INTERVALS (TYP) 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL, I-I/2" WIDE STRAP TYP) 8'-0" 5TEEL 5TAKE FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE ROOT BALL TO 5IT ON MOUNDED 506RADE, REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/5 OF ROOT BALL (Y MULCH-4" DEEP -NO MOUNDING (5EE 5PEG) < JJ } PLANTING 50IL - 5EE 5PEG. TOPSOIL 5UBGRADE 2" X 2" X 24" WOOD STAKE 5ET AT ANGLE 500 X1i Z � DRAIN 5Y5TEM A5 REQUIRED- PER 5PE0. 4" DIAMETER AUGERED HOLE, 42" MIN. "X" x 3 _ DEPTH. FILLED Al 5/4" DIAMETER DRAIN ROCK. COVER W/ 6" FILTER FABRIC. K7 CON I riROUS TRmr: PLANTING L 1 WALE: 1/2• = V-0" ELEVATION 4' SNOW FENCE WITH POSTS VOL. (MAX.) @ DRIP LINE OF OUTER MOST BRANCHES DRIP LINE 4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. REMOVE EXISTING VEGETATION, PER SPEC., BEFORE INSTALLING MULCH. FENCE @ DRIPLINE PLAN NOTE: TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE SURVIVABILITY OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. NO EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED WITHIN THE TREE CONSTRUCTION BARRIER AS DESIGNATED ABOVE. 2 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAILK'5' TR PROTGTION OXTAIL L I WALE: I n' = V-0' L I BGALE: I/8' = V-0" PLANTING DETAILS 923 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 phone (612) 332.7522 fax (612) 332.0936 www.damonfar•ber.com SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR 6570 CHANHASSEN ROAD Chanhassen, Minnesota I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name: Damon Farber Registration #: 12538 Council of Landscape Architectural Registration Boards /CLARB Certification #: 326 11 ✓ \ICI IXOT 'Signature: Date: 11 /30/2006 Authorization DFA Project 4: 06-231 Drawn/Checked: BH/DF Scale: AS NOTED Date: 11-30-2006 Revision: LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET 13 OF 9