PC Staff Report 06-21-2022Planning Commission Item
June 21, 2022
Item Santa Vera Residential Development Concept PUD Amendment
File No.Planning Case No. 2022-09 Item No: B.3
Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS
Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner
Applicant
Hansen HomeTech
7920 Kerber Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Present Zoning Planned Unit Development District (PUD)
Land Use Residential High Density
Acerage 3.82
Density 18.32 units per acre
Applicable
Regulations Sec 20-517 General Concept Plan
SUGGESTED ACTION
The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the direction and
issues for the concept approval of PUD #2022-09, Hanson Homes 2022 Development Project, as
outlined in the staff report."
SUMMARY
The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the
City showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring
substantial costs. The applicant has submitted a plan that includes 30-35 apartment units in a three-story
building, five single-family homes, six townhomes, and an additional eight units added to the existing
18 units on the site.
29
BACKGROUND
In 1998, the City of Chanhassen purchased the western 2.75 acres of the 6.6 +/- acre parcel for City
Center Park. This 2.75 acre parcel was rezoned to OI, Office Institutional. The remaining 3.85 was
rezoned to PUD-R. This parcel was approved for development with up to 30 multi-family residential
units. (#98-2 PUD, #98-3 Rezoning, and #98-7 Subdivision)
In 1977, Saratoga 1st and 2nd Additions were approved. The subject parcel was platted as Outlot B. In
the next year, a PUD was approved for the Santa Vera Apartments which are located on the northwest
portion of the parcel.
DISCUSSION
Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most
normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to permit a variety of housing
types within the development. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a mixing of the housing styles
within the development and to permit a private street system. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility,
the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and
more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts.
City review attempts to provide direction and guidance to allow the applicant to determine the process
they need to follow and what needs to be addressed if they decide to proceed.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the direction and
issues for the concept approval of PUD #2022-09, Hanson Homes 2022 Development Project, as
outlined in the staff report.
ATTACHMENTS
Staff Report
Development Review Application
Hansen Homes Concept Plan
Saratoga 3rd Add PUD
Affidavit of Mailing
Email - Comment
30
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PC DATE:June 21, 2022
CC DATE: July 11, 2022
REVIEW DEADLINE: July 19, 2022
CASE #: 2022-09
BY: RG, EH, JR, JS, JS, ET
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to
the City showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without
incurring substantial costs. The applicant has submitted a plan that includes 30-35 apartment
units in a three-story building, five single-family homes, six townhomes, and an additional eight
units added to the existing 18 units on the site.
LOCATION:621 Santa Vera Drive
Lot 2, Block 1, Saratoga 3rd Addition
APPLICANT:Hanson Hometech
7920 Kerber Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
612) 369-1910
PROPOSED MOTION:
The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the direction and
issues for the concept approval of PUD #2022-09, Hanson Homes 2022 Development Project as
outlined in the staff report.”
31
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 2
PRESENT ZONING:Planned Unit Development – Residential, PUD-R
2040 LAND USE PLAN:High Density Residential (8 - 16 units per acre)
ACREAGE:3.82 acres DENSITY:18.85
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving amendments to PUD’s because the
City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. An amendment to a PUD must be
consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The purpose of the conceptual review of a PUD is to establish the parameters for the
development to proceed through the next phase of the PUD process. Specifically, the City needs
to evaluate the types and distribution of land uses within the proposed development and provide
the applicant with direction as to the issues and concerns which the City has with the proposal.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Sec 20-517 General Concept Plan
https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book?type=ordinances#name=Sec_20-
517_General_Concept_Plan
32
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 3
BACKGROUND
In 1998, the City of Chanhassen purchased the western 2.75 acres of the 6.6 +/- acre parcel for
City Center Park. This 2.75 acre parcel was rezoned to OI, Office Institutional. The remaining
3.85 was rezoned to PUD-R. This parcel was approved for development with up to 30 multi-
family residential units. (#98-2 PUD, #98-3 Rezoning, and #98-7 Subdivision)
In 1977, Saratoga 1st and 2nd Additions were approved. The subject parcel was platted as Outlot
B. In the next year, a PUD was approved for the Santa Vera Apartments, which are located on
the northwest portion of the parcel.
DISCUSSION
Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of
most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to permit a variety
of housing types within the development. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a mix of the
housing styles within the development and to permit a private street system. In exchange for this
enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a
significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the
other more standard zoning districts.
Comprehensive Plan
The property is guided for High Density Residential use, which permits densities of 8-16 units
per acre. With a total of 70 units being proposed on 3.82 acres, the density is 18.32 units per
acre. This is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The maximum number of units given
this land use designation is 61. The City may increase the permitted net density of a project by
25 percent. The “bonus” density must meet affordable housing criteria as defined by the City.
Developers shall be required to enter into an agreement ensuring the affordability of the units.
Landscaping
The site is a mix of maintained and unmaintained green space including maintained landscape
area in the generally north half of the site and unmaintained natural area in the south half.
Landscaping requirements for the site include:
Foundation plantings around apartment buildings
Front yard landscape for townhouses and single-family
Buffer yard landscaping along park borders. Preservation of existing trees could qualify
to meet buffer yard requirements depending on the amount preserved.
Parking lot landscaping depending on whether the lot size exceeds 6,000 square feet.
Other landscaping issues to consider include treating or removing and replacing any ash trees on
site as well as preservation of existing significant trees.
33
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 4
Streets
The existing apartment complex’s at-grade parking area gains accesses via two driveways
located off Laredo Drive to its east and Santa Vera Drive to its west. The proposed
development, located south of the existing apartment complex, also abuts Laredo Drive to its
east. Based on the initial concept plans provided, Public Works/Engineering does not find it
appropriate to construct a public through-street that would connect Laredo Drive and Santa Vera
Drive. Access is sufficiently provided between the two streets via Saratoga Drive just north of
the existing apartment complex. Furthermore, the proximity of the intersections where a public
street would meet Santa Vera Drive in relation to the intersection of Saratoga Drive and Santa
Vera Drive would be out of conformance with standard access management guidelines and City
Ordinances. City Ordinance requires that local streets have a centerline offset of not less than
300 feet (Sec 18-57(i)). Additionally, an intersection at this location would add more conflict
points based on the proximity of the intersection of Saratoga Drive and Santa Vera Drive, which
is further exacerbated by the western driveway access to the existing apartment complex located
approximately 70 feet south of said intersection. Lastly, a street extension through this parcel is
not identified in the Comprehensive Plan which identifies areas where street network
connectivity is lacking. As such, staff would recommend approval of a private street to provide
access into the site and that the private street be located at the existing intersection of Laredo
Drive and Del Rio Drive. The private street will be required to use traffic control that is
consistent with the current version of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices, along with meeting the criteria listed in Sec. 18-57.n, o., and p. Sec. 18-57.p.2 includes
the requirement that covenants concerning maintenance and snowplowing operations shall be
filed against all benefit properties
Based on the proposed density of the conceptual development it is expected that new trips to the
adjacent street network during the peak hour will generate the need for a traffic impact study. In
order to assess impacts such as traffic safety, access management, current street capacity, etc., a
traffic impact study performed by a licensed engineer is recommended to accompany the
preliminary construction plans. The study will describe: key traffic issues; the characteristics of
the surrounding transportation system including operations of key intersections including but not
limited to Kerber Boulevard and Santa Vera Drive and W. 78th Street and Laredo Drive; existing
and background conditions; site-generated conditions; as well as on-site circulation as a through-
connection is not recommended (i.e., an adequate turnaround within the development meeting
City Ordinances).
Staff agrees with the conceptual proposal that pedestrian connectivity is warranted along
Saratoga Drive and Santa Vera Drive to connect existing trail and sidewalk pedestrian routes.
However, based on recommendations previously discussed in this section, the proposal to have
public pedestrian routes through the private development, as indicated on the last page of the
concept plans, is not recommended.
34
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 5
Wetlands
City GIS records indicate the presence of two small wetlands within the project site located on
the southern portion of the property. The preliminary plans submitted with the Conceptual PUD
show grading and structures in conflict with the wetlands in the City’s GIS database. The
applicant will need to confirm the existence and limits of all existing wetlands onsite as outlined
by the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). A wetland delineation report will be required with the
preliminary plat submittal.
The applicant has provided a letter dated May 1, 2000, which states that the Water Resources
Coordinator at that time determined that there were no wetlands on the property; however, no
wetland delineation or decision was found. Furthermore, the letter appears to be in reference to
681, not 621 Santa Vera Drive. WCA wetland delineations and decisions expire after 5 years, as
such a new report will be required with the preliminary plat submittal. Recent aerial images and
topography support the GIS wetland database showing two small wetlands on the property.
The existing wetlands have been classified as a Manage 3 wetland in the City’s Surface Water
Management Plan. Article VI, Chapter 20 of City Ordinance describes buffer strip and setback
requirements. A Manage 3 wetland requires a 16.5-foot permanent buffer and a 30-foot setback
from the buffer strip for principal structures. The Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed
District (RPBCWD) also has rules that regulate wetlands and wetland buffers. The applicant will
need to meet both City and Watershed wetland rules.
Grading and Drainage
In the existing condition, stormwater runoff generally flows from west to the east. City Center
Park which boarders the property to the west is located on a high point, with stormwater leaving
the park in all directions. Stormwater is transferred downstream through the site primarily by
overland flow via a conveyance channel that routes runoff to three catch basins located at a low
point along Laredo Drive. Stormwater from the site is collected and conveyed by public
infrastructure including storm sewer and wet ponds before discharging to Lotus Lake. There are
no public or private stormwater best management practices (BMPs) located on the site. As such,
stormwater pollutants generated by the property are removed by public infrastructure
downstream.
The conceptual plans did not include any grading or stormwater design. The applicant shall
include stormwater routing and grading as part of the preliminary plat submittal. The design will
need to account for all existing stormwater generated by the site and upstream properties to
perpetuate existing flow patterns. Based on the impervious area in the preliminary plans
permanent stormwater BMPs will be required to treat stormwater and reduce runoff rates.
The project site is in an older part of the city developed in the 1960’s and 1970’s. Rules and
regulations governing stormwater conveyance and pollutant removals have evolved significant
since that time. As a result, by today’s standards this area of Chanhassen is deficient in
35
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 6
stormwater BMPs which creates higher pollutant loading to Lotus Lake. The development of the
Santa Vera property is an opportunity to help correct this problem through the construction of
stormwater treatment in excess to the limits outlined by existing regulations. The property is
currently zoned as PUD for 12 units per acre, however the preliminary plans show an increased
density of 18 units per acre. As such, the applicant is seeking relief from the City on the zoning
for the project site. To offset this increase in use, it is recommended that the applicant provide
increased levels of water quality treatment to alleviate the stress on downstream stormwater
infrastructure. It is therefore proposed that the applicant oversize water quality treatment BMPs
by 50% to allow treatment of stormwater from public ROW. An alternate approach would be for
outlot areas on the property to be used for public stormwater treatment. In both cases, the City
would adjust stormwater fees to help fund the improvements.
36
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 7
Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control
The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject
to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction
Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES
Construction Permit). The SWPPP is a required submittal element for preliminary plat review.
No earth disturbing activities may occur until an approved SWPPP is developed. This SWPPP
shall be a standalone document consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall
contain all required elements as listed in Parts III and IV of the permit. The SWPPP will need to
be updated as the plans are finalized.
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main
Currently, municipal sanitary sewer and potable water services are available and extend into the
site to service the needs of the conceptual plans. However, these public mains will be required to
be relocated by the developer to accommodate the layout of the future development. Upon
receipt of preliminary construction plans the locations, depths, alignments, material, and type of
all sanitary sewer and water mains will need to conform to the most recent edition of the City of
Chanhassen’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Additionally, as these mains will be
located within a private street, as recommended under “Streets” of this report, public drainage
and utility easements will be required over the public utilities in order to adequately perform
maintenance and repairs. These easement widths can be determined upon receipt of preliminary
construction plans. Lastly, the development will be assessed and required to pay all appropriate
sanitary sewer and water fees as outlined in the City of Chanhassen’s Fee Schedule at the rate in
effect at the time of final plat and/or site plan approval.
Stormwater Management
Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management
development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be
reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site
plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include water quality
treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total
phosphorous (TP), and runoff rate control for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events. The
proposed development appears to exceed the one (1) acre of new impervious area and will
therefore require permanent stormwater BMPs to be constructed as part of this project to be
owned and maintained by the owner. A stormwater maintenance agreement and associated
operations and maintenance plan is required for all private stormwater BMPs.
The proposed development is located within the RPBCWD and is therefore subject to the
Watershed’s rules and regulations which include water quality, water volume abstraction, and
rate control. RPBCWD rules require 1.1 inches of stormwater abstraction for all impervious area
new and existing) for the entire project area when over 50% of the project area is being
37
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 8
disturbed. The project will require permits from the Watershed District. Early coordination with
the Watershed is encouraged by the City to ensure the applicant understands the rules and
procedures.
A stormwater management plan is required for preliminary plat review. The stormwater
management plan outlines the governing rules and regulations along with the design calculations
associated stormwater infrastructure. A typical stormwater management plan includes the
following:
Project narrative
Impervious area calculations
Governing stormwater rules and regulations
Hydrologic and Hydraulic (H&H) modeling reports
Water quality modeling
Peak runoff rate analysis
Water quality analysis
Operations and Maintenance plan for permanent stormwater BMPs
Geotechnical report
Infiltration rate testing
Stormwater Management Fees
City Ordinance sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A water quality and
water quantity fee are collected with a subdivision. These fees are based on land use type and
are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the
degradation of surface water.
This fee will be applied to the new lots of record being created. It is assessed at the rate in effect
at that time; the 2022 rate for high density residential is $15,870.00 per acre of developable land.
Miscellaneous
Building:
1. Building permits must be obtained before beginning any construction.
2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State
of Minnesota.
3. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets
all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or
requirements may be required after plan review.
38
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 9
4. The apartment building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems.
5. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the
Code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to: allowable
size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be
addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted.
6. Apartment building plans must include a Code analysis that contains the following
information: Key plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and
area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext. walls,
Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required
Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count.
7. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional
engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction.
8. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before
building permits will be issued.
Fire:
1. Road widths, parking lots, and entrances will need to be within fire apparatus access road
minimum widths, which could lead to no parking on either side of the road if done to
only minimum standards.
2. Multiple hydrants will need to be put into the development.
3. If the current existing apartment building does not have a fire sprinkler system, it will
need to have one installed when adding the 3rd level.
4. New apartment building will need full fire sprinkler system.
5. If only two townhomes are side by side, a fire sprinkler system is not required. Three or
more will need fire sprinklers.
Parks:
As mentioned in the General Notes of the Concept Plan, the applicant is requesting the existing
trail be removed near on the southwest side of the proposed development. The City believes this
is a vital link for our public trail system and, at this time, lacks the desire to remove this section.
Park Dedication fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and
approval.
39
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 10
Development
To proceed with the development of the site as proposed, the applicant would need to complete
the preliminary PUD process and amend the PUD zoning for the site. The current PUD
specifically prohibits single-family homes, detached townhouses, also known as cottage homes,
and townhouses. This would include preparing the specific design standards to be included in the
PUD ordinance. The project would also require subdivision review and approval to create the
ability to sell off the various housing units and build dwellings on the parcels. Finally, site plan
approval would be required to approve development of the townhouse and apartment units, and
before any building construction could occur, building permits would need to be applied for and
issued.
Without a survey of the property, it is unclear whether the proposed uses and buildings on the
site would actually work. While small lot detached homes are a desired housing style, the plan
appears to require an inordinate amount of land to accommodate the houses. Single-family
homes with detached garages are not a desirable housing type. This design would also negatively
impact the preservation of trees along the southern property boundary. Cottage style homes may
be an alternative. A more efficient design may include townhouse units on both side of the
entrance off Laredo Drive.
If the existing apartment building is expanded, the apartment would need to meet the parking
requirements in City Code.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the direction
and issues for the concept approval of PUD #2022-09, Hanson Homes 2022 Development
Project as outlined:
1. The proposed development must address the Comprehensive Plan inconsistency.
2. The proposed development must prepare tree preservation and landscaping plans as
appropriate for subdivision and site plan review.
3. Recommend use of a private street to provide access into the site and that the private
street be located at the existing intersection of Laredo Drive and Del Rio Drive.
4. A traffic impact study performed by a licensed engineer is recommended to accompany
the preliminary construction plans. The study will describe; key traffic issues; the
characteristics of the surrounding transportation system including operations of key
intersections including but not limited to Kerber Boulevard and Santa Vera Drive and W.
78th Street and Laredo Drive; existing and background conditions; site-generated
40
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 11
conditions; as well as on-site circulation as a through-connection is not recommended
i.e., an adequate turnaround within the development meeting City Ordinances).
5. Pedestrian connectivity is warranted along Saratoga Drive and Santa Vera Drive to
connect existing trail and sidewalk pedestrian routes. Public pedestrian routes through
the private development, as indicated on the last page of the concept plans, is not
recommended.
6. The applicant will need to confirm the existence and limits of all existing wetlands onsite
as outlined by the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). A wetland delineation report will
be required with the preliminary plat submittal.
7. The Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) also has rules that
regulate wetlands and wetland buffers. The applicant will need to meet both City and
Watershed wetland rules.
8. The applicant shall include stormwater routing and grading as part of the preliminary plat
submittal. The design will need to account for all existing stormwater generated by the
site and upstream properties to perpetuate existing flow patterns. Based on the
impervious area in the preliminary plans, permanent stormwater BMPs will be required
to treat stormwater and reduce runoff rates.
9. It is recommended that the applicant provide increased levels of water quality treatment
to alleviate the stress on downstream stormwater infrastructure. The applicant shall
oversize water quality treatment BMPs by 50% to allow treatment of stormwater from
public ROW. An alternate approach would be to outlot areas on the property to be used
for public stormwater treatment. In both cases, the City would adjust stormwater fees to
help fund the improvements.
10. The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be
subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with
Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal
System (NPDES Construction Permit). The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,
SWPPP, is a required submittal element for preliminary plat review.
11. Municipal sanitary sewer and potable water services are available and extend into the site
to service the needs of the conceptual plans. However, these public mains will be
required to be relocated by the developer to accommodate the layout of the future
development.
12. Public drainage and utility easements will be required over the public utilities.
41
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 12
13. The development will be assessed and required to pay all appropriate sanitary sewer and
water fees as outlined in the City of Chanhassen’s Fee Schedule at the rate in effect at the
time of final plat and/or site plan approval.
14. A stormwater management plan is required for preliminary plat review.
15. The proposed development appears to exceed the one (1) acre of new impervious area
and will therefore require permanent stormwater BMPs to be constructed as part of this
project to be owned and maintained by the owner. A stormwater maintenance agreement
and associated operations and maintenance plan is required for all private stormwater
BMPs.
16. The proposed development is located within the RPBCWD and is therefore subject to the
Watershed’s rules and regulations which include water quality, water volume abstraction,
and rate control. A permit from RPBCWD will be required.
17. City Ordinance sets out the fees associated with surface water management. Water
quality and water quantity fees will be collected with a subdivision.
18. Building permits must be obtained before beginning any construction.
19. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State
of Minnesota.
20. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets
all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or
requirements may be required after plan review.
21. The apartment building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems.
22. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the
Code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to: allowable
size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be
addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted.
23. Apartment building plans must include a Code analysis that contains the following
information: Key plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and
area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext walls,
Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required
Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count.
24. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional
engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction.
42
612 Santa Vera Drive Concept Approval
June 21, 2022
Page 13
25. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before
building permits will be issued.
26. Road widths, parking lots, and entrances will need to be within fire apparatus access road
minimum widths which could lead to no parking on either side of the road if done to only
minimum standards.
27. Multiple hydrants will need to be put into the development.
28. If the current, existing apartment building does not have a fire sprinkler system, it will
need to have one installed when adding the 3rd level.
29. The new apartment building will need full fire sprinkler system.
30. If only two townhomes are side by side, a fire sprinkler system is not required. If adding
three or more, they will need fire sprinklers.
31. Meet all parking standards.
32. To proceed with the development of the site as proposed, the applicant would need to
complete the preliminary PUD process and amend the PUD zoning for the site. The
project would also require subdivision review and approval.
33. Site plan approval is required to approve development of the townhouse and apartment
units.
34. Park Dedication fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat
submission and approval.
ATTACHMENTS
Development Review Application
Hanson Homes 2022 Development Project
Saratoga 3rd Addition PUD
g:\plan\2022 planning cases\22-09 621 santa vera dr\staff report santa vera concept.docx
43
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard
Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317
Phone: (952\ 227 -1 100 / Fax: (9521227-1110
5/*/ro*
PC oate: tD et
CITY OT CHAI{HASSII{
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Submiftal Date
Att ottrers.................
CC Date
425 E Consolidate Lots...
6GDay Review Date 1 rltI
n
tr
Refer to the apqogiale Applicaton Checklist for requircd submittal infoinat:an that must ac.filpany this application)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment......................... $600 E Subdivision (SUB)
n Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers...-.$1OO E Create 3 lots or less .....................-.................. $300
E Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (_ lots)
E Single-Family Residence ...............................- $325 E Metes & Bounds (2 tots).................................. $300
n lnterim Use Permit (lUP)
E ln conjunction with Single-Family Residence.. $325
E Atl others....... .......-............ $425
F
n Sign Plan Review............................................-...... $150
E Site Plan Review (SPR)
n Administrative .................... $100
Commercial/lndustrial Districts-...................... $500
Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area:
thousand square feet)
lnclude number of e2!Sli4g employees:
lnclude number ot4eq employees:
E Residential Districts......................................... $500
Plus $5 per dwelling unit (- units)
E Notification Sign (city to install and remove)
1s0
Lot Line Adjustment......................................... $1 50
Final P|at.............. ............... $700
lncludes $450 escrow for attorney costs)*
Additional essow may be required for other applications
300
Rezoning (REZ)
through the development contract.
EL Ptanned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 E Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)....
I Minor Amendment to existing PUD................_ $100 (Additional recording Iees mayapply)
E Att others...................$5oo E variance (vAR). $200
n Wefland Alteration Permit (WAP)
n Single-Family Residence.....-......-.................. $1 50
n All ottrers....... .................. $275
Zoning Appea|................ $100
E zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500
qIE: When multiple applications are p,ocessed concufienlty,
the appropriate fee shall be charged tor each application.
200
ffi Property Owners' List within 500' lcity to generate afte. pre'application meeting) -.............. -.. $3 per address
63 addresses)
Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)...................-... ........ . ....... $50 per document
E conditional Use Fermit E tnterim Use Permit ! Site Plan Agreement
n Vacation E Variance E Wetland Alteration Permit
n Uetes a Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) n Easements (- easements) E OeeOs
TOTAL FEE:
Section 1: Application Type (check all that aPply)
Section 2: Required lnformation
6r\r (eZ\ aF\ h V EPR.
Property Address or Location:O ,'1 t-oT RS*lagzo. Atrr;rfroxi
p"r."1x, L6l z ?>I Legal Descdption E,l€.h-\oet^f*slrsror-l
Total Acreage:
Present Zoning
Wetlands Present?pves ! trto
Requested Zoning
3-,15
Select One PU D . Select One
Select One Select One
Existing Use of Prooertv: V f(^t.iT LpI
ECnecf box if separate nanalive is attached
Description of Proposal:
Requested Land Use Oesignation:Present Land Use Designation:
44
Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant lnformation
APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this applicalion, l, as applicant, represent to have obtained
authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to
the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. lf this application has not been signed by
the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application
should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any mafter pertaining to this
application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I
further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility sludies, etc. with an estimate prior to
any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name 5 +b contact: 6?AEY 1-\HntseU
Address: TfZD KreSR B.fED pnone: Glz'3L9.l1 tb
City/State/Zip ciJrr,-ii{ts@ Cell:
Fax:
Date
r. E.
Email: 4AP ErJ
zo
PROPERW OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do,
authorize the filing of this applicalion. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those
conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of
the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may
be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the
study. lcertify that the information and exhibits submitled are lrue and correcl.
ruame: Douquns H*lrs=-* contact: D,uQ f$-r-ised
nooress: i1969 N*H siLp-rDz phone:3ZD - 7a7 _l il B
city/state/zip gpIcEA r,".r./ 5G268 Cell
Fax
3zo4Y,-8<93
Email r-,Con,-
Signature Date:5.
This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by
applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Applicalion Checklisl
and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural
requirements and fees.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within '15 business days of application submittal. A
written notice of application deticiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within '15 business days of application.
PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable)
Name:Contact:
Phone:Address
City/State/Zip
Email:
Who should receive copies of staff reports?*Other Contact lnformation:
Prooertv owner Via: f'l Emart
Ei nppri".nt Via: Ei Email
Engineer Via: E Email
E othef via: fl Emait
E[ Maiteo Paper Copy
E Maiteo Paper copy
E tr,,taiteO Paper Copy
E uaiteo Paper copy
Name
copy to the city for processing
SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM
Section4: Notificationlnformation
City/State/Zip
Email:
r*l
Signature:
Cell:
Fax:
Address:
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your
device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital
45
HANSEN HOMES
2022 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SITE PLAN CONCEPT - DESIGN ELEMENTS OMITTED
46
SITE PLAN
HIGH DENSITY - MIXED HOUSING
HANSEN HOMES
2022 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Zk f^f[^kl h_ma^bmr hng\be%in[eb\h_Û\bZel Zl p^ee Zl ma^lnkkhng]bg`g^b`a[hkl%maZgd rhn hk mZdbg`mbf^mh h makhn`a hnk hg-
im ieZg hk mabl g^p o^ehif^gm ikhc^\m'hk^Zgrmabg`%p^pZgm^]mh lbfier maZgd rhn hk bg`Z iZkm h_mabl hffngbmr Zg]fZdbg`
aZgaZll^g ma^ZfZsbg`bmr bm bl mh]Zr'P^hglb]^k rhn Z g^b`a[hk Zl mabl bmr bl pa^k^p^ebo^Zg]phkd Zl p^ee Zg]p^Zk^ahghk^]mh
Z iZkm h_mabl hiihkmngbmr mh hgmbgn^mh a^ei aZgaZll^g khp bgmh ma^nmnk^'
nm hk^p^fho^hkpZk]%p^eho^mh ehhd Z\d mh ma^iZlm Zm hnk lmhkr pab\a lmZkm^]Z\d bg 2/)pa^g hn`AZgl^g l AZgl^g
Debg`^eanms"hn`am Z\k^l khf Zkf^k D^k[^k'hn`aZ]Z oblbhg hk aZgaZll^g maZm ehhd^]rhg]ma^p Zkl%lfZee lmhk^Zg]ihlm
h_Û\^Zm ma^mbf^'A^nbem ang]k^]l h_ahf^l maZm fZgr h_rhn fZr ebo^bg mh]Zr pbma ma^a^ei h_abl mph lhgl @Zkr Zg]Lm^o^AZgl^g ghp
AZgl^g Ahf^m^\a"'
Ho^k ma^r^Zkl ma^AZgl^gl aZo^hgmbgn^]mh ebo^Zg]phkd pbmabg ma^hffngbmr'Mabl eZlm fZchk o^ehif^gm ikhc^\m bl ma^eZlm Z\k^l h_
maZm eZg]khf Zkf^k D^k[^k'P^phne]eho^mh l^^mabl eZg]m o^ehi^]hk hn`%Zl p^ee Zl hk ma^k^Zm aZgaZll^g hffngbmr'
Hnk ikbfZkr hZe bl mh o^ehi mabl eZg]mh e^g]bgmh ma^g^b`a[hkahh]'Lhf^mabg`maZm hma ahghkl aZgaZll^g Zg]qm^g]l mhpZk]ma^
nmnk^pbma jnZebmr mbf^e^ll lb`g'Ma^Ûklm mabg`rhn phne]l^^khf EZk^]h k'phne]lbg`e^Zfber ahf^l Zg]mhpgahnl^l%pab\a mh nl
k^li^\ml ma^hffngbmr fn\a fhk^'abg]mahl^ahf^l phne]Z g^p ZiZkmf^gm nbe]bg`Zm ma^Z\d h_ma^ikhi^kmr g^Zk ma^Zee Û^e]
maZm pbee Ûgbla o^ehibg`mabl eZg]'P^ieZg mh ebfbm Zee nbe]bg`l mh hger mak^^lmhkb^l pab\a Zohb]l nk]^gbg`ma^lnkkhng]bg`g^b`a[hkahh]
oblnZeer'
EZlmer%p^pbee k^fh]^ebg`ma^nkk^gm LZgmZ O^kZ ZiZkmf^gml maZm hn`AZgl^g nbem bg 201%r Z]]bg`Z mabk]lmhkr Zg]ni]Zmbg`ma^
qm^kbhk'r hbg`mabl%p^pbee Z]]fhk^glbmr Zg]Zelh ni]Zm^bm r nmbebsbg`g^p khh_ebg^l Zg]lb]bg`mZbel mh e^g]pbma ma^g^p o^e-
hif^gm ikhc^\m mh Z]]oZen^mh ma^g^b`a[hkahh]'
Ma^AZgl^g gZf^aZl g Z hng]Zmbhg a^k^bg aZgaZll^g lbg\^2/)Zg]p^Zk^mak^^g^kZmbhgl i bgmh ma^nmnk^'hk ma^iZlm
rkl AZgl^g Ahf^m^\a aZl hgmbgn^]bg ma^nbe]bg`bg]nlmkr Zg]p^phne]o^kr ikhn]mh Z[e^mh o^ehi mabl eZg]hk mabl hffngb-
mr Zg]mh hgmbgn^ma^AZgl^g e^`Z\r bgmh ma^nmnk^'
Dbg]k^`Zk]l Zg]Z`Zbg%maZgd rhn hk mZdbg`mbf^mh k^ob^p hnk hg\^im ieZg'
hn`AZgl^g%@Zkr AZgl^g%Lm^o^AZgl^g%Zg]aZkeb^AZgl^g
47
SITE PLAN CONCEPT - DESIGN ELEMENTS OMITTED
NEW APARTMENT BUILDING
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
TOWN HOUSES
UPDATED APARTMENTS
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
SITE PLAN
HIGH DENSITY - MIXED HOUSING
48
SITE DETAILS
HIGH DENSITY - MIXED HOUSING
SITE PLAN CONCEPT - DESIGN ELEMENTS OMITTED
New apartment building
mh ngbml%e^o^el
hhmikbgm Z[hnm 0)q+))
Ng]^k`khng]iZkdbg`
hnm iZkdbg`lihml hnmlb]^
hffngbmr liZ\^hnmlb]^g^Zk iZkd
Lb]^pZed Z\\^ll makhn`a g^b`a[hkahh]mh iZkd
Single Family Housing
Ahf^l
lj m ngÛgbla^]Zl^f^gm
q-1 hhmikbgm Lmhkr
Ehml Z[hnm q*,)
Ehml fZbgmZbg mk^^khpma mh fZbgmZbg ikboZ\r Zg]oZen^
bg hffngbmr b'^l\ahhe%iZkd%Zg]lnkkhng]bg`g^b`a-
hkahh]"
Town houses
mhpg ahnl^l
lj m ngÛgbla^]Zl^f^gm
Lmhkr ZkZ`^Zg]gmkZg\^fZbg e^o^e"
q-.hhmikbgm lbg`e^ngbm"
Lbg`e^ngbm ehm Z[hnm q2.
Updated apartment building
1 qblmbg`ngbml 1 g^p ngbml
Mabk]e^o^e Z]]^]mh Z]]ma^1 g^p ngbml
qm^kbhk k^ghoZm^]mh fZm\a ni]Zm^l hg ikhi^mr
Bgm^kbhkl k^ghoZm^]Zl m^gZgml fho^hnm
Neighborhood Park
gm^k h_g^b`a[hkahh]pbee aZo^Z hffngbmr Zk^Z(
iZkd mh bg\k^Zl^hffngbmr bgoheo^f^gm 49
SITE
ONE WAY ROAD
BEVERLY LN.
Hg^pZr fZbg lmk^^m lrlm^f lZo^l
liZ\^Zg]lZ_^k hk Zfbeb^l
Znl^h_ma^bg\k^Zl^]glbmr%
mkZ_Û\Ühp pbmabg ma^g^b`a[hkahh]
fho^l ZpZr khf ma^l\ahhe nbe]-
bg`mhpZk]l D^k[^k eo]'
Ab`a mkZ_Û\mbf^l nkbg`l\ahhe
khi h__Zg]ib\dni bl ma^g Zohb]-
E^ll iZo^f^gm f^Zgl e^ll pZm^k
run off from property
gh makn mkZ_Û\lb`gl Zg]hg^
pZr lmk^^m lrlm^f lb`gl pbee
place on the property entrances
SITE PLAN CONCEPT - DESIGN ELEMENTS OMITTED
BUILDING STEPS
51
ONEWAYROAD
BEVERLYLN.
SITE PREP
@khng]q\ZoZmbhg
Ng]^k`khng]Bg_kZlmkn\mnk^
Lmk^^m Zg]lb]^pZed
BUILD
Lbg`e^Zfber Ahf^l q
K^ghoZm^qblmbg`
ZiZkmf^gm nbe]bg`
Mhpg ahnl^l q
iZkmf^gm nbe]bg`
potentially completed before end of 2023)
BUILDING STEPS
SITE PLAN CONCEPT - DESIGN ELEMENTS OMITTED
52
DESIGN CONCEPTS
GENERAL AESTHETIC OF DEVELOPMENT
LB@G HG<>IML BG:E LB@GL LMBEE MH BG:EBS>=
DESIGN CONCEPT
POSSIBLE SINGLE HOME FAMILY DESIGN PLAN
53
DESIGN CONCEPT
POSSIBLE SINGLE HOME FAMILY EXTERIOR DESIGN
Single family homes will have
detached garages which will
allow narrower lots but still
adequate room between
homes.
This creates a better curb
appeal without a garage
dominant facade.
LB@G HG<>IML BG:E LB@GL LMBEE MH BG:EBS>=
DESIGN CONCEPT
TOWN HOMES EXTERIOR FLOOR PLAN IDEAS
54
DESIGN CONCEPT
TOWN HOMES DESIGN CONCEPTS/IDEAS
LB@G HG<>IML BG:E LB@GL LMBEE MH BG:EBS>=
DESIGN CONCEPT
APARTMENT BUILDING DESIGN CONCEPTS/IDEAS
55
DESIGN CONCEPT
APARTMENT BUILDING DESIGN CONCEPTS/IDEAS
56
Ng]^k`khng]iZkdbg`ng]^k g^p ZiZkmf^gm nbe]bg`
pbee d^^i iZo^f^gm hhmikbgm lfZee Zg]k^]n\^pZm^k
run off property
Lbm^ieZg lb`g fZbgmZbgl mk^^khpma mh bg\k^Zl^
oZen^h_ikhi^kmr Zg]ikboZ\r khf g^b`a[hkbg`
l\ahhe(iZkd
LnlmZbgZ[e^pZm^kla^]fbmb`Zmbhg m^\agbjn^l Zg
nl^]mh d^^i pZm^k hg ikhi^kmr nkbg`a^Zor kZbg_Zee
b'^'ng]^k`khng]blm^kg pab\a Zg Zelh nl^]hk
likbgde^k lrlm^f mh nm hpg hg pZm^k nlZ`^"
Mh Zohb]Zg hg&lbm^pZm^k hee^\mbhg ihg]p^Zg
bfie^f^gm l^fb&i^kf^Z[e^iZo^f^gml(]kbo^pZrl
lb`g hZel Zk^mh k^Zm^lhf^mabg`mbf^e^ll Zg]
ni]Zm^]pbma lb`g Z^lma^mb\oZkrbg`khf nbe]bg`mh
nbe]bg`mh Zohb]fng]Zg^Zg]k^i^mbmbo^lb`g
Lb]^pZed makhn`a g^b`a[hkahh]mh iZkd pbee
Z]]^]Zl p^ee Zl Z bmr lb]^pZed hg ma^ghkma lb]^h_
ikhi^kmr hk ma^lZ_m^r h_ma^gmbk^g^b`a[hkahh]
LiZ\^hk Z nmnk^Z]]^]e^oZmhk bg mhpg ahnl^l pbee
ZoZbeZ[e^
iZkmf^gm nbe]bg`pbee aZo^hffngbmr Zk^Z bg ma^
Z\d h_ma^nbe]bg`g^Zk Zl^[Zee be]
K^jn^lm hk g^p g\bg`mh bglmZee^]hg lhnma lb]^
h_ikhi^kmr mh k^ieZ\^he]pbk^g\^mh bg\k^Zl^ikboZ-
r Zg]g^kZe g^b`a[hkahh]Z^lma^mb\
P^fZr k^jn^lm Z lfZee lb]^pZed aZg`^(lbfiebÛ\Z-
mbhg bglb]^ma^bmr gm^k IZkd hg ma^lhnma p^lm lb]^
h_ma^ikhi^kmr mh bo^Z]]bmbhgZe blmZg\^(ikboZ\r mh
ahf^l l^^ehp"bg q\aZg`^hk Z]]^]bmr lb]^-
pZed hg ma^ghkma lb]^h_ma^ikhi^kmr
@K>>G 6 qblmbg`%EN>6 Z]]^]%K>=6 k^fho^]
GENERAL NOTES
57
1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE
CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE,
BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS:
Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby
amended by rezoning all property within Lot 2, Block 1, Saratoga 3rd Addition to Planned Unit
Development – Residential.
Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design
standards:
Saratoga 3rd Addition Zoning Standards
a. Intent
The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD high density residential development. The use of the
PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more
sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be underground. The development shall proceed
through the site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. The PUD
requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site
design. Except as modified by the standards below, the development shall comply with the
requirements of the R-12, High Density Residential District.
b. Permitted Uses
The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to multi-family residential uses. A total of 46
units are permitted on the site. (There are eight existing units.)
Multi-family Residential – This shall be defined as multi-storied apartments or condominium
units.
c. Prohibited uses
Townhouses
Detached Townhouses
Detached Single-Family Homes
d. Setbacks
Street Frontage Minimum Setback Building/Parking (feet)
Laredo Drive 50/50
Saratoga Drive 50/50
Santa Vera Drive 50/50
Interior Lot Line 15/50
58
2
The PUD standard for hard surface coverage is 65%
e. Building Materials and Design
1. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural
standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material
compatible to the building.
2. All material shall be of high quality and durable. Major exterior surfaces of all walls
shall be face brick, stucco with metal, wood, rock face block and stone accents. The
structure shall have a pitched roof.
3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted or broken face.
4. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary
structure.
5. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing
material or camouflaged to blend into the building or background. Wood screen
fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully
screened by compatible materials.
6. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or
other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through
building design or appropriate landscaping. The building(s) shall have varied and
interesting detailing. The use of a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing,
such as change in material, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual
relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass and scale of
the wall and its views from the public ways shall be prohibited.
7. Space for recycling shall be provided.
8. There shall be no underdeveloped sides of building. All elevations visible from the
street shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities.
f. Site Landscaping and Screening
1. Landscaping along streets shall comply with buffer yard standard B. Interior lot lines
shall comply with buffer yard A, 10 feet in width. A landscape plan must be
presented for approval with the site plan review process.
2. Storage of materials outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan
review.
g. Signage
1. Signage shall comply with the sign ordinance for residential districts.
2. All signs shall require a sign permit.
59
3
h. Lighting
1. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light levels shall be no more than ½ candle at the
property line. Light fixtures shall not be more than 20 feet in height. This does not
apply to street lights.
i. Alternative Access
1. Separate pedestrian access shall be provided from the site to the public sidewalk and
trail system.
Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the
aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office
for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the
notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference
and made a part of this ordinance.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of _____, 20__, by the City Council of the City
of Chanhassen, Minnesota
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor
Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ______________________________)
60
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss
COUNTYOFCARVER )
I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on
Jtre 9,2022, the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota;
that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice ofConsider a request to
review a concept residential PUD for mixed density housing on property located at 621
Santa Vera, Planning Case N o.2022-09. Zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD).
Applicant: Hansen Hometech / Property Owner: Douglas Hansen to the persons named on
attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner,
and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage
fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by oth$ appropriate
records.
T City Clerk
Subscribed and swom to before me
ttriff-dayo 2022.
JEAN M SIECKLII{G
i5i.ry tutlotUtrnccca
fry o{r -at E{a-b !t,2@aNotaryPubc
61
Subject
Parcel
DtsclaiarEa
ThE map is neither a legally recoded map nor a su ey and is not iniended to be used
as one. This map is a comFiilatjon of records, info.mation and data located in vadous cjty,
county, state and fedeGl ofices and other sounes regarding the area shown, and is to
b€ used for reference purposes only. The City does not uatrant that the Geographic
lnfomaton system (G,s) Data used to prepare this map ale eror free, and th€ cily does
not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigatonal, trac*ing or any oiher
purpoGe requiring exacting measuement of distance or direction or pfecisioo an the
deFic-ton of ge€raphic ieatures. The preceding disdaimer i3 provaded pulsuant to
Minnesota StaMes S465.03. Subd. 21 (2000), and $e user of this map acknorvledges
that $e crty shall not be liable tor any damages, and e)Q.esst waives all dajms, and
agrees to deE.E, incbmnify, and hold hatmless the CiV ftom any and all claims brcught
by User, iE employees or agefits, o. thid pades wtlich adse out of the use/s ac.ess or
use oI data provided.
TAX_NAME,t
ITAX_ADD_Llr
tTAX-ADD_L2r
rNext RecordrnTAX-NAMEI
IITAX_ADD_Ll l
TAX-ADD-L2r
Subject
Paacel
L**a*i l
I t
r-1
l't
l
I
l
t--
lt
n
t
i
ll
Fr"
i,
This map is nerther a legally recorded map nor a suryey and is not intended to be used
as one. This map is a compilatjon of rccods, information and data located in various city.
county, state and federaloffices and other sources regardlng the alea shown, and is to
be used for reference puQoses only. The City does nol wanant that the Geographic
Information System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map ale enor free, and the City does
not represent that the GIS Datia can be used for navigational, tracking or any olher
purpose requiring exacting measurement of c,istance or direction or precision jn the
depiction of geographic ieatures. The p.eceding disdajmer is provided puGuant to
Minnesota Statutes 5466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges
that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all daims, and
agrees to defend, indemniry, and hold hamless the city f.om any and all claims bought
by user. its employees or agents, or third parties which aise out ol the useis access or
use of data provided.62
E
c
c;
E
q
E
E
a
F
c
ci-
oo
F
g
NNoN
N
o)c
j
o!
I.)
F
o
dl
o
o
ooF.
t-
ut
o)
o
E(!
c
oEfoO
6I
o
6ll
o-
cq)
Eo-
6
oo
cl
Eocc(
o
L
Dq)
coN
o)c'6
aee
or=
Eg(
5!
soo.xE'.
o .!zo^
o !-r
9L
9E
E: C(I,q)
OEEii
an(JD
E-
bgocaooo*
of,!?
dg;
l- o)
coo
o)
Eo-
c()
E(!
I
c
OJ
Co-
a
o)
foo
d
o
9
o
9
6
9o
o3
ForD^>
aoE
6"9
U) -a
N-(o<
o
c.,';i.
o-
0)!
ll.)
lo
ap
0)
E-
ior0f -cttO -JR --i A€
e'E A E
i,E€ -3"q 5
Ei i e I a.; PlZEE= O (l)= ci: o - - o--c -o c
AEEE EEgE
FEBS :iE;
ti gP
EHeeE:.9.9 g x 6 0
g*;s s= ro9aoot.9E fl
g*E+
EEEE4.9 -c .: o(,l,,.Jo-
d!= gr(EqEE6+9F (! c(J (,-Nd)S
olc
o)
q)
Ec
o
9
E
Eoo
o)
Ecc(
5
L
rP -.ln:,(:: 9>,o o g or+-=
E=-EEI?33B"893:se65q,9 9.EfigtEsEEa
H El::sEi'
E ll E E or or -6
fiElglEEE6Pl8r99cr;
q.rl 6 9-I98ql€teEE
EHSa es;
61; Pg5
EE;:EE=o*r-c:toa
PIN E=*8-*
EgHgfrf;E
5
c,
lo
aiI
NoN
o
tr
E
C'
o6t!
Eco
C
3q
B
E
n)
oo
q
0)
E
C)
oo
o-
U;
b(UEO'
i(E!
o.:
l _o
ij=o-
p'5oE>
o-6o'r9
on)FE
ol
coi'6
o
o
E
E
c
ac
Eco
o-
cc([
c,q
q
ii
o
o=
o
o0)
o
o
o)-
c
o
Dopq
E.
f
c)
o
0)p
Eco
o)
a
E
ui
q)
o-
o!
aoo)o
c
n)
o
E
E
0)
E
c
o
s
E
oc
rl)
Eqo
o
E
0)
o)
ooo
qac.
9o
UIz
I
E
E
6
3
E
o
JoJ tootto
o-
troo
o
ii{,
o
E
o,
oo
G
Ero
o.(geto-J
Iiito.=
o. :tf=
O(!.E
o
o9CEoo
6=OE:
oao
Btr
ooE
tDo
l,!
2.oiEErE
9oEo
tDr.g
oE
ai, G.
9d
OE23
ot!
E
G
o
ac
oo
P.ELtooaa(, .=
EoE=
o9(Jisr
OE
3E
E1z'o
IDaG
Eoso
9 -.-arc: !1 >rqPEPF5,
E oEH . os
3e8 P 3f e
E A#E E EBxEl =E 6E >
E El= e"-3H
ficIEiEEEE-Pl Rr9Rar;ol 5 0=I9
Hqe*c E 6
tl=8SEE::
clr (D 6r -c r
Dl(9 c E - cEE;:EE=
o*F-cXrod6r'-c! (D *o.^
HEHgfi#H
Eq)
oo-o
o-
O
c
9.
o)
o
iD
o-
9..
b(5cO)
ox
6=
of
P5o-E;+
oll'= ();,
8FO =i
o
vo
o
9.
fo
oto
NNo(\l
o
E
oot!
t!
o
ol
E
o)
0)
Ec
9
9.
E
Eoo
o)
gccoL
Co
coI
qo,:
o
o
9
0
p
IDg
o
E9o
oE
E.eo^>
eoE
6Soi
N-(o<
o)
E-
loh*
AgE
E366E'r E
Et EE E *":gi: e'E At: E:
iiEE s'3et
E'=E g ;sEEtiE.+k i=E 6:: [,
8 9 HEE
ex€= E=sgfr
EEEe EiHP
3 E:T PiPEHsEiHE!
ge= e8fS;
i d6€-EFoc(.)i/rrN(,)st
o
ID'
6'
o-
o
c.
n)
f,
aE
e
E
9I
E
oo
t-
o
Nc.loN
N
o)c
f-
j(!
E
ofF
oi
q
2
co
0)
ooF.
f.*
a
0)
o
E
Eo
ocaoo
o-
E
o)
o)
Eo-
a
0.)
ttEoI
gEgtEEEEEE'iEEi
iEEEiEiEEEEEiEEE
EgEEiaEEEgEaEgig
lEcEEfEEiEiEEEaE
iEE*itiEEEiEi'E'E
EEi$EEiiEEggFEEE
e
I
3
5
E
9d
a, .=
6r!+ a,f=€
O(ll.c
H
oO ..
o9EEoa,
o=(DE:
ooo
irt
EF
c6
6'
lllo
o
GIoJ
ooo
CIIG saIL
o
Eq,(
Lo
o.
Eto
0, 'Eo.llleto.J
i"
i:€(,
t!o
E
fooPE
E;
E.g
OEqrl)o x^!
E=
9::
onE95I
e o- EoE _9
E9ooo)d) 'al ^.
99EE=)
t8Eoccu)oco(,(g9od
rEEf0€
l
V'(
sEc
d,
E
o)o
iE6
d)vao)
E_8;g
9. -
a6aE;i(
Evoq)
O^f
iXsr9t ,,
ooS3E
5 o.F
E\uocacoE4
9E
E9ioExccgoo)
e3,Aq5 -E)cccEQ
di1
LE I;63
QOQOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOc,clc)OOOc)O C. Or Or l{).r qr N rn rn € <f 4 F. .fi (o ln o'! N !n O + r-r a a N o.n - - -'5 -,5NO...r N O o ln o o o Ln e) O l..r c) l.n (o O O r/) Fr (o c.r c) rt ; (o ri lri ; 6 Fr |,) r-rrr1oooooooooooooooooooo6ao6o6ocio66cicjdN0oc) co o .r o o o .--{ Q 9 i a n ri 6 O Fr O - 6 6 - o = o - 6 - o = 6c!oor ororol 0qooto€o ol 0g or@ooot qi co6ooototaot -6oo6ao 666O1.. r-l F d rn 0O.n rr1 F. @(n ln6N oO oO rY) F. oOrnoO(OF.(E.n oorri€roo..riaOaLArnraLnl,l l,) u) r/) Lo Ln Ln ln !n u1 u) tn lo Ln Ln !n l,l Lo !n l'. !a rJ,) t4 la rn l.') l.n tt rO r/iNNa\(\N r\l N N N.t NNa!a! a\J N N a.{ a.,1 N a! a!.{NNN N r! a{ N(\l a\t N.!
z
e)
H t i i 7 = * = =- = E = z-, E = N E = = E = E = = E = N = N = E = N z-,
EEE*EASHEISBBcISSEIeHeB?eBSHeEPEPH?=;g=gsEssFEssEFEEsFEsE=FESEEESESE5
OFl+OaOFrNNrOslS9'4 I@oOo)o) OOOFrt-r.!N N (nlY)<t sl Ln Ln (O(o
o !_.,r !n !o !4 a A o o o o o o o o o o o - - ; r-.{ r-r r.i ii ; ; ii i i -r -r .-r .rl.,l f\ (O I.- f- F rO LO Ln rn U'! L,t rn U1 rA u1 rn Ln rn Ln U) t4 Ln !n !n ra U)u)!,1rnLn!n rrr l,r L,l
rr (D d ra € @ Ln d .r '4 0q .r c) oo t) oo o Lnooooooq).o@@ooo o@6 o Fcoo(i.oF. 6odFF (,1 F.r\NFo) Or F. r- (,1 F. F. t- t- t\ F. F-ol or No)otoorF Fqror i\ q1 0) ol or qr irt irl.r to * * * * * * * ri ri * rl * * rl * rl A A * * * * * rl * * * ,- *
a.{ lJ) I !'l F{ !'{ Fl Fl Fl Fl Fl i-i r-{ r-l F{ F.l .-l Fl .-{ t-{ F{ F.{ !.1 Ft Ft F{ !.{ F.t F.l r-t ..,t r-{an F .n rn rn .n rfl (Yt rn dt (n lrl ro dt .n .n an dl dl an rn .n an tn d) d) rn (n an dl d) rn.\ r/) Ln rn lo ro Ln 6 ln ln u) lJ) la rn Ln L't La t/) !n !a ul Lr1 t) t4 |J1 rn !a l.n l.n '4 uidd ? , .. r..r L/l Lr1 Ln La !/'! rJ) rn lJ) !a rn sr La !n lJ) ui 6 lat tri lri '
ri
lri lri lri rri ti'ri '
rt
rri r/t.
r € Y Q Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
3 3 ts 2 "i- ; ; 2 2 ; ; 2 2 i i 2 i i 2 2 2 2 i i i 2 i 2 2 i i i i i-,32! ; S U U U U U U AAAUH H H H H H 3 H AAUAH H H 3 H HHn .- 5 ^---<u\u\u1
u1 th th ui v\ v,t ul th ta ta ta v\ v\ t/t tA rn r^ th q 6 rlt q i oq v)
n E.yio_ r r r r I - - -- r r - rI - r - r rr- - :E r r rI- --
rr,a _u a E z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z
I o- -'i O I I I I - - - -- I - - - - ! I I - =- -- - I - II - IF (J u' (J 6 IrJ (J (J (J (J (J U (J (J (J U U U U (J (J (J (J U u (J (J (J (J U (J (J (J O O
IoN
TJJ-
h 9
E$s;odi>
t =x 2? = x = = = E = = E = E E = > E = N = = E= E = E = E = E=
TEE?qEgEETgHBCIgPETgEgEIPEPEgEgEgE
3'$ ff I A H f 5 H s H H : s E x H H 5 H * Hlc.l N m or O o O O O O O O O O O O O ri - - Fr r{ ; - .-r - H i ; r.r r-{ FrFrFFlr"l-l Fl H Lr1 LnrnLOl,)Larn Ul U) lJ) lJ] rn LO Ln Ln rn !a gl !n rr1 lr1 rn Ln !a rJ1 |J|)u)LnlJ1
4,
5 6EE z qaE , 5 Z=
i, s ii',i* EEgEi8E
l**E;III=Egr=EEEE=
giEg=;EEEaEgEggg
64
Il=egErEE;e;E'EIElEEE3;=EE*IEIE=EE=
eaeA
i2a o
1 {!\|{{{{{{-.J\.1 \.1 ! .-f -.1 :.J >l:{ { \l { {O1 Or cl) qr {Jl (Il (rl (rl lI (,r
d Li +; +i +; }; +i .6 .d .E .s .tr .tr .E .tr .s .s F 'tr .tr .tr 5 5 c) O qr u, N N N, Nr F F. PPE66666,b (o (o !o (r, b (!' b ao co oo ao @ @ { sr or G (n N o E\ o P o to @ ..,l'-l
6 rJ @ @ a or Ln !n 5 uJ (rJ N P P o (o (o { lJr o P (o @ < a a a o oh t- t- t- r- t- t:t
e 3 B B E i E E ????a e E i ?i-i:aa-z.1iiiii g H E E B E
EE HHHHH gHHdH HHHHHH g ; HHH;EEE 6 frZZzzz*-
I o o o s s I o o ? g g 3 g B g 3 g ZZZ= ZZ= jZ; v v a v v = v , - v v V v v - - 7 - -
z
@
o
a) a) o a) .) 6 a) a) o .) .) .) a) r) r) o .) .) .) o o o .) o o o o o Q o o r) o o .)----
r-----....-----r-------IEII--r-
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 z z z 2 z z z z 9. z z z z Z 1 1 z z z z
r--ar----------'tn 't/t i/1 't ah'a \ -ri -tJ1 t iJt -v\ i, -t lrt'ttt't, a/1 -1, \, t4 6 tn - t/t vt t, l/ll @v)t, l lnq1iiii; ii. i .^ .n ./) i^O;666.l, (;6 6 tr1 t, "f H H = S S S H H H ffi H H HHmmmrrllr1ll| m m m rn ln m m rrl rr1 m m m m m Tn?
z ? z ?,2 = ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? " ? ? " ? " " " ;? ? ? " ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Z>=-2==22 2 z z z zzzzzzzzzz t z z z 2 z z z zz zz
r.n trl ta u! (n (^ ur ( (n r.rr q1 u't (r ur u rn ur (^ (, gr t o rn 90 !4 !4 !4 !4 !4 !4 14 Ln ui ut ra
a; ari 666 trrta tn r.nLtt6 ut ut rn vr irt G q t.n!nultrrur N) lJ't (n (r(ntn ut!rur(rt.rrurdj6jnj6j6ja.j u,) @ llJ u, 6j u, @ t, lJ.) q) !D (,lJ ur lrr l! (! (! O ur ur (^, (rr l, (rJ ur (r, qr q, u)
r. r- p r.. p F r. t. p F t. P r- i r. r_ P P P H P P P (, ts H r. r. ts ts F. P P P P
l -l -l -l rJ -r -l -l { \r \r { -l -l -l rJ {-J-l { ! { >l @ :.1 :l!!{\l:.1 {{{{- -'5.iGGGG .6 .,5 -d,j; -.b,b6,ir,b' !e.c.c,b.ce "b.c'b..c-l-l-l-j-rE -i -t 6-l -l E @'.1 { s{'.lP{90 (b 0o (,o:Jr- r- r- r- r- r- a |J 6a F-a<PP 5 ur (rr (! (rJ @ cb@0oo
j \j { \.t ! ! ! \J \r { { -.J ! {.{ .'J { { { ol1.{ ol1 oll { ('1 l'jnLnururESS55555555555FE55a555ouJurqrnJNr \i P t. P l.
i o (o (o (o ro (o 6 (o (o (g (o (o (o (o 6 @ oo @ co { o o o (Jr N.) o Q o P o (o co { \l
o rJ (o @ n or (^ ut 5 L.,, w N p FJ o (o (o ! ul o P Lo @ 94 vt ra a 6 (Jt - r- r - aou\ t!\ t^ ut t\ u1 th tn v1 l f'\ t- tt q ln > > > > t- > > > > P P m
F = v v n n' = " " izE I I q ?.7.36E q E { : g : x g E E E 3
OOOOO=tr,Clnc,Cr
r)trlc,.)r)=r)Cf CT0E C|OOOinnn , , ; v u - v v i P v - - ? - v v a i , i , v
N)AJhJI\.'NJNN)N'NJNJN.'N)N,,NAJNJNJN)N'NJAJN.)N)nJI\.)NNN)NJNJ\INJI\JN.)N)G in in ir U ir ir (, ut rr! (n i, ir 6 si (.Il (.rl ur (^ !r! (n (/r (, iJr ur er ( lrr (r ur 91 ( (Jr (/1 (,/1<
i tr :j <i -r -r -J p -r \l -i <j < <j <i -l - n ri Ao >l \t tl -l P { { \l { q., (4 ur @ (, cooiiooioidi6; oi i.o oioioiddddor 5a o (ocoororo ot (o 01 .tr@o)(o(oto(o(Dco666666666656tr6trFr-O6'! E'. F. o aoooooooooF6655565o6656o6oo65ooooo-oooooooooootr6E66t- 6 6 tr 6 tr tr 6 tr F tr F 6 F P P - O o o 5 o N) ^
J
ll P Fl (n
L i\) i-. E b 6 6 b or co (l) < bo in tr \r .E i\) b < + r,r r.J lJ (o lrJ N P 5 e Q (D e >ltil5i5b55656666d66bdooociooooooooFoooooo
65
ooooooooooooooo
o-diF(o6..lor.{o<t@oo-r F{ O O O O l! <l Fr m rn O O (Ylstoo6666000000000--
6..66oooooOaOOooiol616rchadto\ 01 (D or or ot o1 01.-{
J .-t Ft ..{ d r\ F F F F F T-r F l.\
r^ r,! rn r^ r^ rn rJl lrl Ln lJ] l/) ln Ln ln l..\
i ^
i
N N N N r! N N 6l a.,l N N a! a\
l O OO(!r'{ -{.r9l>.!<r<r6 66od F{ <f OrO@(o@Gl \o(.lrO(l) rOC,rn9r4dtcr6t6160rO',r (,1 6000
r- F. l- F. r\ F f. f\ F F- f\ F F f\ I\
i i ;.r .-r !-.t Fr..1 F.t Fl -l r'a -l Fl ?l .{.
6 .n .n .n rn (n (Yl dl d) rr1 ln rn (n anrnirirrirnL/) Ln lJ1 rn L/] rJ] ur l,) '
4
L lJ1 Ln
Lai ln 6 rn ln u) !n rn Lrl lJ1 lrl Ln ln ulLazzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
222ii2;2iii22iiuJl.J tlJ LrJ IrJ UJ l! trJ lfl IJJ llJ tlJ llJLlJt-^ t t t't u1 ut tt\ t1 th v\ v1 vt th t \ u\ v1ltAaatattr\ rh tt\ v1 vl vt \r\ v7 v1 ur
II-II-E---I---Izzz.2zzzzzzzzzzz
r-I-I--I---III-OOOoU(J(JuLruuu()u(J
JJ)JJ)
d.d.G.g,G,E
33=3=1;116-EEEEEElEiiEeggg--
I--EY<:==<xxxxu(Juuu(JYJ:.YJajcjoor{ -r o O F{ Fl ri rn rr1 (O qt aa aO aO
aOiltnBhfl3B838oooor- F. F F. F. F F F. F F F d O- IL O-
Ergd-<
t/t__
ut(J;
Xi 63--= .^E
g=EE==I=EEEUgEE
JJJJA,
a.G.d,G&E O!!!!!!:
n:iI=-#iFrrJi! uJ !r.r t! I! < X < < X F 2 < X
aEeaE=EeE(J (J (J (J U I Y I Y :Z I (O < !Z J
H !-{ o o t-.r Fr ti arl l/1(ogrFO I r-..
r + 6(oF. 01 00000(o vtoo
1,1 rn rn rn L,1 rrl (o (o lo lD (o o N (l, roF. F T\ F. F F T\ F F N F I.I1 F' l\ F
66
From:Steckling, Jean
To:Steckling, Jean
Subject:Proposal for Santa Vera
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2022 12:09:30 PM
From: Amy Anderson <anderamyk@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 10:27 PM
To: Generous, Bob <bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>
Subject: Proposal for Santa Vera
Good evening,
This is in regards to the concept plan on Santa Vera.
My first reservation is safety. Santa Vera is used frequently as a route for vehicles to bypass
the traffic lights and stop signs downtown to shortcut over to Kerber from Laredo. This stretch
doesn’t have sidewalks and the stop sign is often used as a “rolling” stop. To address this it
seems a sidewalk for all of Santa Vera and the stretch of Saratoga between Santa Vera and
Laredo would be a minimum safety step. Keep in mind this area is in the walk-zone for the
elementary school and is next to a busy park— it is frequently used by walkers and bikers.
Additionally, during games Santa Vera is often full of parked cars (even in no-parking zones).
To add essentially an entire neighborhood‘s worth of traffic in this mix seems a recipe for
accidents and/or injuries.
My second concern is the size and scope of this plan. The surrounding neighborhoods are full
of single family homes and a handful of twin homes with fairly spacious lots. To cram in such
a large scale development with two large apartment buildings, townhomes, and single family
homes would entirely change the character of these neighborhoods.
I am concerned about the hardcover percentage even with the use of permeable pavers given
the scale of the proposed development. Permeable paving is a start but it isn’t 100%
permeable.
I fear that the size of this plan is supersized for the lot. I believe it should be scaled down
significantly before proceeding again.
Thank you for your time.
Amy
67