08-08-2022 Agenda and PacketA.5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Note: Unless otherwise noted, work sessions are held in the Fountain Conference Room in
the lower level of City Hall and are open to the public. If the City Council does not complete
the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular
agenda.
A.1 Traffic Safety Committee Presentation
A.2 Discuss Regulation and Licensing Short-Term Rentals
A.3 THC Law
A.4 Discuss Eliminating Solicitor Licensing
A.5 City Council Roundtable
A.6 Future Work Session Schedule
B.7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)
C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
D.CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will
be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is
desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City
council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for
each staff report.
D.1 Approve City Council Minutes dated July 11, 2022
D.2 Receive Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated June 21, 2022
D.3 Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated June 14, 2022
AGENDA
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 8, 2022
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD
1
D.4 Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated June 8, 2022
D.5 Approve Claims Paid dated August 8, 2022
D.6 Reappoint Youth Commissioners to the Park & Recreation Commission and Environmental
Commission
D.7 Authorize Execution of Operations and Maintenance Agreement for the 7851 Park Drive
Property
D.8 Authorize Execution of Two Separate Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Agreements
for the Cunningham 2nd Addition Subdivision
D.9 Approve Consultant Agreement for Geotechnical Investigation Services for the Galpin
Boulevard Reconstruction and the Crimson Bay Road Reconstruction Projects
D.10 Resolution 2022-XX: Accept Public Streets and Utilities Improvements in Foxwood, City
Project No. 2016-07
D.11 Resolution No. 2022-XX: Award Contract for the Lake Susan Trail Rehabilitation Project
D.12 Ordinance XXX: Amendment Concerning Improvements and Encroachments in Public
Easements
E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and
submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda).
E.1 Don McDonald Citizen Action Request
F.PUBLIC HEARINGS
G.GENERAL BUSINESS
H.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
I.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
J.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION
J.1 2022 Building Permit Activity
J.2 Mediacom Programming Changes Letter 07-19-2022
K.ADJOURNMENT
GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the
Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.
That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.
2
Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is
required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at
https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers
prior to the meeting.
Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the
Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be
addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is
not a member of the City Council.
If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a
spokesperson that can summarize the issue.
Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the
Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council.
During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in
discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a
thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request.
Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an
individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be
directed to the City Manager.
Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West
79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the
public are welcome.
3
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Traffic Safety Committee Presentation
File No.N/A Item No: A.1
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A - Discussion only
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority Operational Excellence
SUMMARY
Members of the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) will give a presentation summarizing the work over
the past year and will present to the Council a Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy/decision matrix.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
Since the last TSC update provided to Council during a work session in July of 2021, the TSC has
received approximately 65 new cases. The most common concerns raised were regarding crosswalks
and pedestrian safety, signage, and speeding. The TSC will provide a breakdown of these statistics and
insights into how evaluation of cases have helped the City improve strategic priorities such as
operational excellence, communications and asset management. Lastly, the City's draft crosswalk policy
will be presented to Council followed by a Q&A session.
4
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Crosswalk Policy - Treatment Flowchart
Traffic Safety Reports Last 12 Months
5
CITY OF CHANHASSENCrosswalk Policy
Uncontrolled Crossing Locations Treatment Flowchart
Crosswalk concern
received or identified
Is there a crash history
involving any
pedestrians
at the crossing?
Does the crossing being
evaluated serve two or
more regular pedestrian
traffic generators?
Is there a marked
crossing less than
500 feet away?
Is the area planned for
future pedestrian connectivity
through the latest City
Comprehensive Plan or a planned
street project?
Is there adequate
sight and
stopping distance?
Can the obstruction
be removed?
NO ACTION
RECOMMENDED;
RESPOND TO
CONCERN & FILE
PERFORM ENGINEERING
STUDY AND EVALUATE
RECOMMENDATIONS
CONSIDER
”UNMARKED PEDESTRIAN
CROSSING FACILITY”
GO TO TABLE 1
Any additional unique
circumstances which
would require a study?
Y Y
Y
N
N
N
N Y
FEASIBLE NOT FEASIBLE
1. Regular pedestrian traffic generators include public or private facilities such as; schools, mutifamily dwelling, commercial
areas, transit stops, parks and recreational facilities, trails, and places of worship.
2. An “unmarked pedestrian crossing facility” is any treatment that improves a pedestrian’s ability to cross a street short of the
marked/signed and enhanced crossings detailed in Table 1. Installations of this type of pedestrian facility are subject to TSC
review and the City Engineer’s judgement and may include curb ramps and/or a raised median refuge. However, no effort
is made to attract pedestrians or recommend that pedestrians cross at this location. The treatments simply provide an
improvement for a low volume pedestrian crossing where pedestrians are already crossing and will like continue to cross.
3. Distance to the nearest marked or protected crossing may be reduced to 300 feet subject to TSC review and the City
Engineer’s judgment. For example, where crossing treatments and crossing activity would not create undue restrictions to
vehicular traffic operations.
SAFETY COMMITTEE
Y
Y
N
N
Y
3
1
2
1
2
3
6
Notes:
1. Painted medians can never be considered a refuge for a crossing pedestrian. Similarly, a 4 foot wide raised median next to a left turn lane can only be considered a refuge for pedestrians if the left
turning volume is less than 20 vehicles per hour (meaning that in most cases the left turn lane is not occupied while the pedestrian is crossing).
2. A multiple threat lane is defined as a through lane where it is possible for a pedestrian to step out from in front of a stopped vehicle in the adjacent travel lane (either through or turn lane).
3. Additional treatments may be considered if suitable gaps in traffic for safe crossing are not available.
Treatment Descriptions
A
B
C
D*
E*
Install marked crosswalk with road-side signs
Specific Guidance: Install marked crosswalk with signs mounted on the side of the roadway (W11-2 and W16-7P) with standard (W11-2) advance
pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations.
Install marked crosswalk with road-side and in-roadway (bollard mounted) signs
Specific Guidance: Install marked crosswalk with signs mounted on the side of the roadway (W11-2 and W16-7P) and “State Law – Stop for Pedestrian”
(R1-6) signs mounted on in-roadway bollards; use standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations.
Install marked crosswalk with signs and geometric improvements to increase pedestrian visibility and reduce exposure
Specific Guidance: For 2-lane roadways, install marked crosswalk with signs mounted on the side of the roadway (W11-2 and W16-7P) and “State Law
– Stop for Pedestrian” (R1-6) signs mounted on in-roadway bollards; use standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School
Crossing locations. Add curb extensions (concrete, paint, flexible delineators) or median refuge islands to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance
and increase pedestrian visibility to motorists.
For 3+ lane roadways, install marked crosswalk with advance regulatory “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) signs mounted on the side of the roadway,
(W11-2 and W16-7P) mounted at the crossing location on the side of the roadway and “State Law – Stop for Pedestrian” (R1-6) signs mounted on
in-roadway bollards; use standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. Add curb extensions
or median refuge islands to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance and increase pedestrian visibility to motorists. Advance stop bars may be
used in combination with “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) sign.
Install marked crosswalk with advanced “Stop here for Pedestrians” signs, pedestrian activated Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), and geometric improvements to increase pedestrian visibility and reduce exposure
Specific Guidance: Install raised median refuge island (unless it is a one-way street or one already exists) to shorten the pedestrian crossing
distance and increase pedestrian visibility to motorists. [If a median refuge cannot be constructed on a two-way street, go to Treatment E]. Install
marked crosswalk with signs (W11-2 and W16-7P) WITH pedestrian activated RRFBs mounted on the side of the roadway and on median mounted
signs AND advance regulatory “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) signs mounted on the side of the roadway; use standard (W11-2) advance warning
pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. Consider adding curb extensions at the crossing if on-street parking exists on
the roadway and storm drain considerations will allow. Advance stop bars may be used in combination with “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) sign.
Do not install marked crosswalk at uncontrolled crossing. Consider HAWK beacon, pedestrian traffic signal,
or grade-separated crossing
Specific Guidance: Consider HAWK beacon, pedestrian traffic signal or grade-separated crossing; application of these treatments will consider,
corridor signal progression, existing grades, physical constraints, and other engineering factors.
*Will require an engineering study to be performed
2 Lanes (one way street) 2 1 A B C A B C
2 Lanes (two way street with no median) 2 0 A B C A B C
3 Lanes (w/raised median) 1 or 2 0 or 1 A B D A C D
3 Lanes (w/striped median) 3 0 or 1 C C D C C D
4 Lanes ( two way street w/no median) 4 2 A D D B D D
5 Lanes (w/raised median) 2 or 3 2 A B D B B C
5 Lanes (w/striped median) 5 2 D D D D D D
6 Lanes (two way street w/or w/out median) 3 to 6 4 E E E E E E
Roadway Configuration
# of
lanes
crossed
to
reach a
refuge(1)
# of
multiple
threat
lanes(2)
per
crossing
1,000-9,000vpd(3)
Roadway ADT and Posted Speed
≤30mph 35mph 35mph40mph 40mph≤30mph
9,000-12,000 vpd
Table 1. Decision Guide for Crossing Treatments
7
Lake
Virginia
Christmas
Lake
Lotus Lake
Brendan
Pond
Lake
Harrison
Kerber
Pond
Lake Susan Rice Marsh
Lake
Lake Riley
Rice Lake
Lake St. Joe
Lake
Minnewashta
Lake Ann
Lake Lucy
ST14
ST15
ST18
ST17
ST61
Minnewashta
Regional Park
North Lotus
Lake Park
Meadow
Green Park
Lake Ann Park
Chanhassen
Pond Park
Chanhassen
Nature
Preserve
Chanhassen
Recreation
Center
Lake
Susan
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Preserve
Power
Hill Park
Fox Woods
Preserve
Bandimere
Community
Park
Bluff Creek
Golf Course
Hesse Farm
Park Preserve
Lake
Susan
Preserve
Raguet Wildlife
Management Are
MN Valley
National
Wildlife Re
MN Landscape
Arboretum
Seminary Fen
Scientific
& Nat*
Bluff Creek
Preserve
Independent
School
District 11
Independent
School
District 112
Independent
School
District 276
Riley
Ridge
Park
Lake Ann Park
Preserve
SA5SA5
SA7
SA101
SA41
SA5
)212PowersBlvd
AudubonRdLyman Blvd Chanhassen RdPion e e rT rlA rb o re t u m B lv d
GalpinBlvdHw y212Hwy 212Hazeltine BlvdMarketBl
vdHwy
7
GreatPl
a
in
s
B
lvdArboretum Blvd
Flying
C
l
o
u
d
D
r
C
o
R
d
1
0
1
ST101
ST101
GH117
Date Created: 7/13/2022
Document Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\Traffic Safety\Traffic Safety.aprxCreated By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 3,000
Feet
0 0.5
Mile
Reported Traffic Concerns - July 2021 to July 2022
City of Chanhassen
Legend
Reported Traffic Concerns
8
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Discuss Regulation and Licensing Short-Term Rentals
File No.Item No: A.2
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
Provide staff direction on the desired approach to short-term rentals.
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
The City has received a few complaints regarding short-term rentals. At a previous work session city
staff discussed with the Council developing a short-term rental license. Staff is proposing two options.
The first would be would be to outsource/contract with a vendor for licensing and enforcement. The
other option would be internal/staff licensing and enforcement.
DISCUSSION
Review elements to consider for a potential short term rental ordinance:
Number and nature of short-term rentals
Regulations (parking, noise, etc.)
Contracting with a vendor or internal staffing
9
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests City Council provide direction as to whether to adopt a short-term rental license and if
regulation should be internal or outsourced.
ATTACHMENTS
Short-Term Rentals Document
10
Short Term Rentals: External Vender (Host Compliance)
Breakdown of Chanhassen’s short term rentals:
1. 37 units for rent* (42 listings)
2. Average Price $468 per night
3. 85% SF Home, 15% Multi-Family
4. 95% Entire Home, 5% Partial Home.
* This is a snap shot of the properties listed on a single day
on July 29, 2022. A pervious report showed 35 units (40
listings).
Host Compliance Services:
Staff met with a vendor who offers software to help with the regulation of short term rentals. The
program is modular and cities can choose which modules meet their needs. A brief summary of
the offered services is provided below.
1. Address Identification
a. Only required.
b. Monitors 60+ websites and uses AI to identify address.
2. Compliance Monitoring
a. Sends enforcement letters.
b. Collects and tracks evidence of violations.
3. Permitting & Registration
a. Online registration process and portal.
b. Customizable based on permitting needs.
4. 24/7 Hotline
a. Call or Online
b. Contacts onsite contact.
c. Documents complaint and resolution.
5. Ordinance Consultation
a. Advise on effectiveness and enforceability of proposed ordinance.
b. Included with purchase.
Take aways:
Staff is concerned 35 rental figure may be inflated/include properties not actively being
rented and actual number is lower.
Depending on fee, number of rentals units, and modules selected program could be
revenue neutral or, if fewer than expected licenses, operate at a loss.
Would allow proactive identification and registration of rentals.
24/7 hotline would allow timely enforcement without impacting staff or law enforcement
resources.
Could add or subtract modules in future years as needs change.
11
Short Term Rentals: Internal
Staff Enforcement:
Registration would be the result of education activities or reactive to enforcement action.
Given small volume of complaints would not expect many properties to come to the
City’s attention.
After hours complaints would need to be dealt with by law enforcement or retroactively
the following day, similar to how current code violations are addressed.
Minimal revenue impact. Would be handled by existing staff and registration fee, if
charged, would not be a significant revenue source.
Past experience with the home occupation ordinance indicates that enforcement actions
on problematic properties could require significant amounts of staff time.
Internal versus External Enforcement
Pros of Internal
Lower disruption to rentals not generating complaints.
Lowest cost.
Cons of Internal
Difficulties with afterhours enforcement.
o Would rely on law enforcement for crisis issues, non-crisis would be
addressed after the fact through normal enforcement policies.
No capacity to pro-actively identify properties.
Neutral
Ordinance requirements would likely be same.
o Noise (existing)
o Trash (existing)
o Parking (new)
o Registration (new)
Staff time required to deal with worst case scenario properties would likely be same for
both.
o Misdemeanor for violations.
o Court order to stop renting.
12
SHORT TERM RENTALS/NEIGHBORING CITIES
Not
Regulated
Regulate Same as Long Term
Rentals
Specific Short Term Rental
Regulations
Prohibit Short Term
Rental
5 5 1 3
The one city that had specific short term rental regulations caped the number of days they
could be rented at a maximum of 60 days per year, but had no other short term rental specific
standard. Cities that defined the term short term rental did so based on the duration of the
rental, using either 15, 30, or 60 days as the criteria. Cities with rental regulations or
prohibitions indicated they used complaint based enforcement to ensure compliance with
their short term rental ordinances. Five cities charged license fees for rental properties.
Fees ranged from a low of $10 with a $50 biannual inspection fee to a high of $205.00
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
None One time Annual
Fee Structure for Cities Regulating Rentals
13
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item THC Law
File No.Item No: A.3
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
Discussion
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
A new law was enacted at the end of the 2022 legislative session that allows certain edible and beverage
products infused with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to be sold. City staff will be prepared to provide an
overview of the new law, the unknowns for regulation and enforcement, and an update on actions being
taken or considered by other cities. No action will be taken at the work session although the City
Council may direct staff to future action.
BACKGROUND
See attachments for additional information.
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
14
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
THC inspection checklist for Law Enforcement
15
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 1/11
Cities and Regulation of Edible
Cannabinoid Products
Published: July 15, 2022
A new law was enacted at the end of the 2022 legislative session that allows certain edible and
beverage products infused with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to be sold. Since the enactment of
the law, the League of Minnesota Cities has been researching and collecting information from
state agencies and stakeholders to answer questions pertaining to local regulatory authority,
law enforcement, taxing, and employment. The following frequently asked questions (FAQ)
aim to provide information to cities on the new law to assist local governments in making
decisions related to the law. The League will continually update the information below as
necessary.
(Updated July 28, 2022)
Get answers to FAQs regarding the new law allowing certain edible and beverage products
containing THC extracted from hemp to be sold.
General information
Q1. What does the new law do?
Q2. Under the new law, where are edible cannabinoids allowed to be sold? (Updated July 20,
2022)
Q3. Could my cityʼs municipal liquor store sell the edible cannabinoid products? (Updated July
20, 2022)
Q4. What regulations are in place for packaging for edible cannabinoids?
Q5. Are these products legal under federal regulations? (Updated July 22, 2022)
Q6. Where do the edible cannabinoid products come from?
Q7. How are the new products taxed?
Enforcement and public safety
Q8. How is the new law enforced? (Updated July 28, 2022)
Q9. What are penalties for someone who violates?
Q10. How do our officers determine if a driver is under the influence of these new products?
Q11. Could cities prohibit the sale of edible cannabinoids entirely? (Updated July 19, 2022)
Q12. Is our city required to adopt regulations under the new law?
City Licensing
16
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 2/11
Q13. What authority do cities have regarding licensing the sale of edible cannabinoids?
Q14. What types of restrictions should we consider in regulating cannabinoids? (Updated July
19, 2022)
Q15. Can a city add edible cannabinoid products to its existing tobacco licensing program?
Q16. If our city licenses edible cannabinoid products, how much can we charge as a license
fee?
Zoning
Q17.What authority do cities have regarding zoning for where the products could be sold?
(Updated July 19, 2022)
Q18. Could cities adopt a moratorium prohibiting the sale, manufacturing or, distribution of
cannabinoids so it can study the issue?
City employment and personnel issues
Q19. Does the new Minnesota legal cannabinoid law change anything about how we do drug
testing for CDL holders? (Updated July 22, 2022)
Q20. Does the new law change anything related to employees who carry a firearm? (Updated
July 22, 2022)
Q21. Are there now “acceptable” limits of cannabinoids for non-CDL employees for purposes of
drug testing at work (i.e., those we test under state drug and alcohol testing law)?
Q22. Can we still prohibit employees from being under the influence of cannabinoids while at
work? Does the League have a model policy with updated language?
Q23. Can employees be in possession of edibles or other cannabinoid products while at work?
Q24. Do we need to change anything in our collective bargaining agreement with regard to
discipline of employees who use cannabinoid products?
Q25. Can employees use cannabinoid products off-duty?
Q26. How does this impact the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act?
Q27. Should my city still continue to include marijuana as a pre-employment panel screen for
my Non-DOT employees? (Updated July 19, 2022)
General information
Q1. What does the new law do?
A1. It is now legal to sell certain edibles and beverages infused with tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC), the cannabis ingredient extracted from hemp.
The new law was passed by the Legislature as part of Chapter 98. Article 13 makes several
changes to Minnesota Statutes, section 151.72 regarding the sale of certain cannabinoid (CBD)
products. The changes took effect on July 1.
The new law amends the scope of sale of any product that contains cannabinoids extracted
from hemp and that is an edible cannabinoid product or is intended for human or animal
17
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 3/11
consumption.
Previous law authorized a product containing nonintoxicating cannabinoids to be sold, but the
authority to sell edible CBD products was unclear. The new law expands the authority to
include nonintoxicating cannabinoids, including edible cannabinoid products, provided they
do not contain more than 0.3% of any THC. An edible cannabinoid product also cannot exceed
more than five milligrams of any THC in a single serving, or more than a total of 50 milligrams
of any THC per package.
Q2. Under the law, where are edible cannabinoids
allowed to be sold?
A2. The new law does not limit where edible cannabinoids products may be sold. However,
certain businesses by their nature maybe be limited on their ability to sell the products. Liquor
stores, for example, are limited to selling specific items set by Minnesota Statute, section
340A.412, subd. 14. The Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division (AGE) of the Minnesota
Department of Public Safety has advised the League of Minnesota Cities that products
containing CBD, hemp, or THC are not allowed for sale at an exclusive liquor store. In addition,
AGE has informed LMC that a liquor storeʼs ability to sell food pursuant to Minnesota Statute,
section 340A.412, subd. 14 (b), does not include edible cannabinoid products.
Q3. Could my city ’s municipal liquor store sell the
edible cannabinoid products?
A3. Liquor stores are limited to selling specific items set by Minnesota Statute, section
340A.412, subd. 14. The Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division (AGE) of the Minnesota
Department of Public Safety has advised the League of Minnesota Cities that products
containing CBD, hemp, or THC are not allowed for sale at an exclusive liquor store. AGE has
advised LMC that CBD, hemp, or THC infused beverages are not intended to be mixed with
alcoholic beverages and are not considered so drinks. In addition, AGE has informed LMC
that a liquor storeʼs ability to sell food pursuant to Minnesota Statute, section 340A.412, subd. 14
(b), does not include edible cannabinoid products. Due to this guidance, LMC recommends
cities refrain from selling such products at their municipal liquor stores.
Q4. What regulations are in place for packaging for
edible cannabinoids?
A4. Along with testing and labeling requirements, an edible cannabinoid must meet several
requirements, including that it:
Not bear the likeness or contain cartoon-like characteristics.
Not be modeled a er a brand of products primarily consumed or marketed to children.
Not be made by applying an extracted or concentrated hemp-derived cannabinoid to a
commercially available candy or snack food item.
May not contain an ingredient, other than a hemp-derived cannabinoid, that is not approved
by the federal Food and Drug Administration.
May not be packaged in a way that resembles any commercially available food product.
Must not be packaged in a container that could reasonably mislead any person to believe that
it contains anything other than an edible cannabinoid product.
18
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 4/11
Q5. Are these products legal under federal
regulations?
A5. The 2018 Farm Bill made several changes to federal law related to hemp. Under the law,
hemp was removed from the controlled substance act, including derivates, extracts, and
cannabinoids, provided those substances contained less than 0.3% THC concentration. If a
product contains more than 0.3% THC it is considered marijuana and not hemp. Pursuant to
the Farm Bill, Minnesota has legalized the production of hemp through its industrial hemp
program.
Although hemp extracts that meet the mandated THC level are no longer controlled
substances, the Farm Bill did not alter the authority of other federal agencies, including the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from regulating hemp and hemp byproducts. Under
current FDA regulations, CBD or THC products cannot be sold as a dietary supplement and
cannot be added to food for humans or animals.
Q6. Where do the edible cannabinoid products come
f rom?
A6. Under current law, these products can be manufactured in Minnesota but also imported
from other states. Growing hemp in Minnesota is governed by the Department of Agriculture,
though the MDA Hemp Program does not regulate cannabis extracts, development and
manufacturing of cannabis extracts, or the retail and marketing of cannabinoid products.
Cities may want to consider zoning implications for manufacturing and production of
cannabinoid products.
Q7. How are the new products taxed?
A7. It is the understanding of LMC that edible cannabinoid products legalized under the new
law are subject to Minnesota sales tax. LMC is waiting for more guidance from the Minnesota
Department of Revenue to determine if any exemptions apply. The new law does not authorize
cities to tax the products in their communities, however LMC is waiting on more information
as to whether the products would be subject to a local food and beverage tax.
Return to top of page
Enforcement and public safety
Q8. How is the new law enforced?
A8. The Minnesota Board of Pharmacy has regulatory authority over drug products that are
implicitly or explicitly intended for human or animal consumption. This includes products
regulated in the new law. If a product does not meet all the requirements of the new law, the
product may be considered misbranded or adulterated. The sale of a misbranded or
adulterated product is a misdemeanor-level crime which is to be prosecuted by the county
attorney where the offense took place. Questions regarding whether a specific product deviates
from the requirements of the new law should be forwarded to the Minnesota Board of
Pharmacy. The Board of Pharmacy has provided a form to file complaints against licensed or
unlicensed cannabis businesses and an inspection checklist to assist law enforcement.
In addition, the new law limits the sale of CBD and THC products to persons over the age of 21.
The sale of CBD and THC products to a person under the age of 21 is a misdemeanor-level
19
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 5/11
crime which is to be prosecuted by the county attorney where the offense took place. Cities will
need to work with local law enforcement and the county attorney to determine how to enforce
this requirement.
If cities desire to further regulate CBD and THC products within their jurisdiction, they will
need to work with their city attorney to adopt local regulations.
The League is working with the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association and Minnesota Sheriff ʼs
Association to understand potential implications for law enforcement and identify additional
questions pertaining to the enforcement of these new products along with employment related
questions for law enforcement.
Q9. What are penalties for someone who violates?
A9. A violation of the new law is a misdemeanor. In most cases, the county attorney is charged
with prosecuting these violations.
Q10. How do our of cers determine if a driver is under
the in uence of these new products?
A10. The new law does not change the current rules relating to driving under the influence of a
cannabinoid. Officers should use the same process to determine sobriety as they have used if
they suspected a driver was under the influence of marijuana.
Q11. Could cities prohibit the sale of edible
cannabinoids entirely ?
A11. In most states that have adopted adult use cannabis legislation, local governments are
given the option to either opt-in or opt-out of cannabis in their communities. This framework
helps to maintain local control of the cannabis issue. The new Minnesota law does not provide
such an option. Therefore, the new law makes the new cannabinoid products legal in every city
throughout the state.
Without a clear opt-out option, the question as to whether a city could completely prohibit the
sale of edible cannabinoids is an open question. One potential approach would be to follow the
Minnesota House Researchʼs suggestion to LMC that it may be possible for a city to classify
cannabis edibles containing THC as an intoxicating cannabinoid and therefore would not be
allowed under the new law.
Arguments have also been made that a city may be able to prohibit the sale of edible
cannabinoids products under its authority to provide for the health safety and welfare of its
community. If a city were to attempt to prohibit edible cannabinoids under this authority, it
would need to work with its city attorney to develop findings that clearly show the dangers of
edible cannabinoids products and the need to prohibit the products. Cities may want to look at
communities that have banned the sale of flavored tobacco products as a model for such
prohibitions.
Q12. Is our city required to adopt regulations under
the new law ?
A12. The new law does not require cities to take action in regulating the new products. If a city
chooses not to adopt additional regulations, the sale and production of these new products will
20
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 6/11
be governed by the cityʼs existing zoning and other regulations. In addition, the new law gives
local law enforcement power to enforce violations as a misdemeanor.
Return to top of page
City licensing
Q13. What authority do cities have regarding
licensing the sale of edible cannabinoids?
A13. A cityʼs authority to license comes from either a specific grant of authority from the
Legislature or from its authority to provide for its general health, safety, and welfare. When a
city official proposes local licensing of any activity or occupation, a city first must determine
whether the state already licenses that activity and, if so, whether the law forbids or allows a
local license.
Q14 . What types of restrictions should we consider in
regulating cannabinoids?
A14. If a city decides to regulate edible cannabinoids or other cannabinoid products, the types
of regulations can vary from city to city. Some items a city may consider when dra ing these
regulations include:
What areas of the city edible cannabinoids may be sold or manufactured or distributed.
What business should be allowed to sell edible cannabinoids.
Age of person selling the product.
Location of products within retail establishment.
Pop-up sales.
Transient merchants.
Vending machines.
Distance from other uses (schools, parks, residential, etc.).
Distance between retailers.
Delivery services.
Online sales.
Limit number of establishments within the city.
Age verification.
Hours.
Background checks.
Q15. Can a city add edible cannabinoid products to its
existing tobacco licensing program?
A15. The requirements and legal authority for tobacco products are unique to those products.
While some aspects of tobacco regulations may be used when regulating edible cannabinoid
21
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 7/11
products, the products and the authority to regulate them are quite different. If a city chooses
to license edible cannabinoid sellers, it would be best to do so separately from tobacco
regulations or be sure to carefully dra new language in an existing ordinance that follows the
unique requirements of the new law.
Q16. If our city licenses edible cannabinoid products,
how much can we charge as a license fee?
A16. When setting fees, cities should consider a number of things. First, cities should not view
municipal licensing as a significant source of revenue. License fees must approximate the
direct and indirect costs associated with issuing the license and policing the licensed activities.
License fees that significantly exceed these costs are considered unauthorized taxes.
This means a license fee may not be so high as to be prohibitive or produce any substantial
revenue beyond the actual cost to issue the license and to supervise, inspect, and regulate the
licensed business.
Return to top of page
Zoning
Q17.What authority do cities have regarding zoning
for where the products could be sold?
A17. Nothing in the new law limits a cityʼs zoning authority related to CBD and THC products.
No Minnesota court has interpreted the limits on zoning authority in this context, but at least
one court in another state has ruled that a state law related to cannabis did “not nullify a
municipalityʼs inherent authority to regulate land use under [state] law so long as the
municipality does not prohibit or penalize all medical marijuana cultivation … and so long as
the municipality does not impose regulations that are unreasonable and inconsistent with
regulations established by state law.” DeRuiter v. Township of Byron, 505 Mich. 130, 949 N.W.2d 91
(2020). It is unknown if a Minnesota court would come to the same conclusion.
Cities should be thoughtful and intentional about how zoning regulations related to
cannabinoid products affect their communities and work with their city attorney to determine
what, if any, zoning restrictions should be adopted. Cities will need to consider not only zoning
regulations related to retail sales of CBD and THC products but also the manufacturing and
production of the products within the city. Unless specifically differentiated in a zoning
ordinance, a cityʼs general manufacturing and production zoning provisions will likely apply to
CBD and THC production as well.
Q18. Could cities adopt a moratorium prohibiting the
sale, manufacturing or, distribution of cannabinoids
so it can study the issue?
A18. A moratorium is a tool cities use to pause specific uses in order that the city may study the
issue in anticipation of future regulations. A moratorium is limited to a period of one year. To
adopt a moratorium, a city must follow the procedures in Minnesota Statute, section 462.355,
subd. 4. The statute specifies the specific instances where a city may adopt a moratorium. If a
city were to adopt a moratorium prohibiting the sale or manufacturing of edible cannabinoid
22
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 8/11
products, it should work with its city attorney to clearly state the legal justification for the
moratorium.
If a city does adopt a moratorium, it must actually review and study the issue or meet one of
the other requirements of the statute. More information on moratoriums can be found in the
LMC Zoning Guide for Cities.
Return to top of page
City employment and personnel issues
Q19. Does the new Minnesota legal cannabinoid law
change anything about how we do drug testing for
CDL holders?
A19. No, cities with positions requiring an employee to hold a commercial driverʼs license
(CDL) will recall these positions are regulated by federal law, and those regulations are
supervised by the Federal Department of Transportation (DOT). Federal law preempts state law
related to cannabinoid use; in fact the DOT states in its DOT Recreational Marijuana Notice it
does not authorize the use of Schedule I drugs, including marijuana, for any reason. As a result,
cities should continue to follow their drug-testing procedures related to CDL holders and may
enforce prohibitions against any use of cannabinoids for CDL holders, regardless of state law
protections.
Although there is a legal difference between marijuana and hemp, DOT warns CDL drivers the
hemp products could lead to a positive marijuana test; therefore CDL holders are ultimately
responsible if those products lead to a positive marijuana test.
Cities can find more information on the effects of the new law on drug testing in the LMC Drug
and Alcohol Testing Toolkit, starting on page 22.
Q20. Does the new law change anything related to
employees who carry a rearm?
A20. No. Public safety employees who carry a firearm cannot lawfully use marijuana under
federal law. Federal law prohibits cities from providing firearms or ammunition to an employee
it knows or has reason to think is using marijuana. Although there is a legal difference between
marijuana products and hemp products, it is the understanding of LMC that it may not be
possible to differentiate the products in a drug test. Officers should be mindful of any substance
they ingest because they are ultimately responsible if those products lead to a positive
marijuana test.
Q21. Are there now “acceptable” limits of
cannabinoids for non-CDL employees for purposes of
drug testing at work (i.e., those we test under state
drug and alcohol testing law)?
A21. There isnʼt a clear answer, since THC can remain in the body for several weeks a er usage
(and long a er any intoxicating or impairing effects have since disappeared), so positive test
results may not indicate any wrongdoing on the employeeʼs part and may just be evidence of an
employeeʼs lawful actions done outside of work. The League of Minnesota Cities recommends
23
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 9/11
that employers thoroughly document any suspicions of an employee being under the influence
and to work closely with their city attorney(s) before taking any action against the employee.
With this new area of law, a city may want to avoid relying on the results of traditional tests that
detect metabolites remaining in a personʼs body (for many days or weeks a er using marijuana)
and instead focus on implementing reasonable-suspicion drug-testing protocols to detect
marijuana intoxication based on behavioral observations. Keep in mind, employers may
prohibit all employees from being under the influence while the employee is working. That
would include employees who operate vehicles. Employers may want to revise their policies to
clarify that employees still may not be under the influence of cannabis, legal or otherwise,
while at work.
The National Drug-Free Workplace Alliance offers a toolkit to help employers work through the
complex and confusing issue of marijuana and the workplace.
Q22. Can we still prohibit employees f rom being
under the in uence of cannabinoids while at work?
Does the League have a model policy with updated
language?
A22. Yes, employers can continue to prohibit employees from being under the influence of
cannabinoid products, including edibles, while at work. Although employersʼ obligations and
restrictions related to marijuana use vary widely across the states, there is no law we are aware
of that requires employers to allow cannabinoid use during work hours or to allow an
employee to report to work impaired. Thus, employers may continue to maintain drug-free
policies at the workplace and discipline employees who use cannabinoids during working
hours or who report to work impaired. In fact, one could argue that under the Occupational
Safety and Health Administrationʼs (OSHA) General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act, employers are required to furnish a workplace free from recognized hazards that
are likely to cause serious physical harm. This provision of the Act is typically used in accident
cases where toxicology screens are positive.
OSHAʼs new electronic recordkeeping rule, clarified on 10/11/2018, states “If the employer
chooses to use drug testing to investigate the incident, the employer should test all employees
whose conduct could have contributed to the incident, not just employees who reported
injuries,” with respect to using drug testing to evaluate the root cause of a workplace incident
that harmed or could have harmed employees. Thus, if a city has a non-DOT drug-testing policy
in place, a protocol following this guidance is important.
The League has a Non-DOT Drug and Alcohol Testing and Drug-Free Workplace Act model
policy that has been updated initially, and will be continually updated as the League learns
more.
Q23. Can employees be in possession of edibles or
other cannabinoid products while at work?
A23. Cities may enact policies prohibiting employees from bringing cannabinoid products,
including edibles, to work.
24
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 10/11
Q24. Do we need to change anything in our collective
bargaining agreement with regard to discipline of
employees who use cannabinoid products?
A24. No, but ensure your cityʼs drug-testing policy has been updated and your supervisors are
trained on the behavioral signs and symptoms associated with impairment. Of course, if the
collective bargaining agreement includes language that policy changes need to be negotiated,
then there would need to be a meeting with the union if the cityʼs policy changes.
Q25. Can employees use cannabinoid products off-
duty ?
A25. It depends. Certain types of employees, such as law enforcement officers and other
employees issued firearms and ammunition as part of their jobs, are subject to regulations
from the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, which prohibits firearms and
ammunitions to be given to individuals who do or are believed to use illegal drugs. As noted
above, city positions required to hold a commercial driverʼs license are subject to Department
of Transportation regulations and are not authorized for the use of Schedule I drugs, including
marijuana, for any reason. Thus, these types of employees could be prevented from using
cannabinoid products both on and off duty. Other employees who are not subject to that or
other federal regulations would likely be able to use cannabinoid products while they are off
duty, as there is nothing under Minnesota law which prohibits certain classes of employees
from using cannabinoid products off duty, as long as they are not impaired at work.
If there are any questions regarding whether an employee could be prevented from using
cannabinoid products while off-duty due to federal regulations, please consult your city
attorney before any action is taken.
Q26. How does this impact the requirements of the
Drug-Free Workplace Act?
A26. It does not. The Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (DFWA) requires federal grantees and
contractors to implement a drug-free workplace policy and establish a drug-free awareness
program as a precondition for receiving a federal grant or a contract. However, the DFWA does
not require covered employers to test employees for drugs or terminate them for drug-related
violations, so the new Minnesota state law does not impact the DFWA directly. Minnesota law
allows employers to prohibit employees from bringing legal cannabinoid products to work and
permits employers to prohibit employees from being under the influence while at work. It
would be best practice for cities with drug-free work policies to keep those in effect. If a city
wishes to do so, it can update its policy to include lawful cannabinoid products within its scope.
Q27. Should my city still continue to include
marijuana as a pre-employment panel screen for my
Non-DOT employees?
A27. That is for each city to decide for itself. Because currently there are no devices or blood
tests available that measure marijuana impairment, and because a best practice approach for
Non-DOT marijuana drug testing is to base testing on behavioral observations, some employers
are excluding marijuana from their pre-employment Non-DOT drug screens. Some states even
prohibit an employer from refusing to hire an applicant simply because of a positive drug test,
25
8/2/22, 2:29 PM Cities and Regulation of Edible Cannabinoid Products - League of Minnesota Cities
https://www.lmc.org/resources/cities-and-regulation-of-edible-cannabinoid-products/#Q1 11/11
but Minnesota is currently not one of these states at this time. Any city that chooses to continue
to test for THC for Non-DOT positions must be aware of the fact that these substances may
remain in an individualʼs system for weeks a er the impairing effect of the drug has worn off.
Thus, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to determine whether the positive test indicates
usage in violation of the cityʼs drug-free workplace policy or indicates lawful usage during an
employeeʼs time-off from work. Cities should consult with their city attorneys prior to taking
any action based upon a positive drug test for THC.
Return to top of page
Your LMC Resource
Research & Information Service staff members are ready to help you apply their broad
knowledge to the issues youʼre dealing with today.
Access online form to submit a question, or call us: (651) 281-1200 or (800) 925-1122
26
1
Law Enforcement Hemp-Derived THC Inspection Checklist
7/22/2022
Please complete for each business/location inspected.
Business name
Business address
Street City ZIP Code
Employee name and
title
Inspection Details
Check products labeling to confirm all labeling is correct and appropriate.
Labels must include the following information:
▪ The serving size. State law limits products to 5mg total THC per serving and 50mg THC per
package.
▪ If an edible cannabinoid is intended for more than a single use, each serving must be
indicated by scoring, wrapping, or other indicator of individual serving size.
▪ A full list of ingredients, including identification of any major food allergens declared by
name.
▪ The following statement “Keep the product out of reach of children.”
▪ A statement stating that the “product does not claim to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent
any disease and has not been evaluated or approved by the United States Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) unless the product has been so approved.”
The label information below may be provided on an outer package or may be provided
through the use of a small scannable barcode or matrix that links to a page on the
manufacturer’s website and contains all the required information.
▪ The name, location, contact phone number, and website of the manufacturer of the
product.
▪ The name and address of the independent, accredited laboratory used by the
manufacturer to test the product.
▪ An accurate statement of the amount or percentage of cannabinoids found in each unit of
the product meant to be consumed.
27
LAW ENFORCEMENT HEMP-DERIVED THC INSPECTION CHECKLIST
2
Edible products must NOT include:
▪ The likeness or contain cartoon-like characteristics of a real or fictional person, animal, or
fruit that appeals to children.
▪ Imitations of any brand of products primarily consumed by or marketed to children.
▪ Any packaging that in a way resembles the trademarked, characteristic, or product-
specialized packaging of any commercially available food product.
▪ Any statement, artwork, or design that could reasonably mislead any person to believe
that the package contains anything other than an edible cannabinoid product.
▪ Any claim that the product may be used or is effective for the prevention, treatment, or
cure of a disease or that may be used to alter the structure or function of human or
animal bodies, unless that claim has been approved by the FDA.
If possible, view a sales transaction to confirm that the store is properly verifying age on all
transactions. If it is not possible to view a transaction confirm the process the store uses to
verify no THC sales are to anyone under 21.
Review product packaging. An edible cannabinoid product must be prepackaged in packaging
or a container that is tamper-evident, and opaque at the final point of sale to a customer. The
edible cannabinoid packaging is required to be child resistant. If you suspect the packaging is
not child resistant, you may have to contact the manufacturer and request a Child Resistant
Certificate. The requirement that packaging be child-resistant does not apply to an edible
cannabinoid product that is intended to be consumed as a beverage and which contains no
more than a trace amount of any tetrahydrocannabinol.
Check products for cannabinoids that are not allowed. No other substance extracted or
otherwise derived from hemp may be sold for human consumption if it is intended for health
benefit or intoxication. An example of a hemp derived compound that is not allowed is HHC
(hexahydrocannabinol) and its derivatives. Allowable substances include all hemp-derived
THC and CBD.
Check for product forms that are not allowed. Only hemp-derived THC edibles and beverages
are allowed under state law. Other product forms are not. Examples of unallowed THC
products include flower, pre-rolls, tinctures, moonrocks, or topicals.
Violations may be reported to the Minnesota Board of Pharmacy through a complaint form found at Hemp-Related/Edible
Cannabinoid Complaints (https://stage.wcm.mnit.mn.gov/boards/pharmacy/public/complaints/hemprelatedcomplaints.jsp).
Keep this Inspection Checklist for your records. Submit complaint forms to:
Minnesota Board of Pharmacy
335 Randolph Ave., Suite 230
St. Paul, MN 55102
Fax: 651-215-0951
Email: pharmacy.board@state.mn.us
28
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Discuss Eliminating Solicitor Licensing
File No.Item No: A.4
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
If the Council agrees with staff's recommendation (Abandonment Trial recommendation), an issue
paper and code amendment will be prepared.
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
City staff conducted a planned abandonment trial (Drucker Institute process). The trial constituted staff
taking positions for and against licensing. The jury (staff members) weighed the arguments and
determined that the reasons for eliminating the license requirements were more compelling than the
reasons for maintaining the license requirement.
The reasons to eliminate solicitor's license include:
Provides an illusion of safety without actually being safer.
A No Solicitors sign and the enforcement by the police is sufficient and will still act as a
deterrent.
Background checks are limited for out-of-state solicitors.
29
Enforcement limitations.
DISCUSSION
See attachment for summary of the abandonment trial.
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Abandonment Trial Activity Sheet
30
Planned Abandonment Trial
Program/Policy:
Prosecution Defense
Abandonment Score: Verdict:
Scores: Average:Scores: Average:
Drucker Institute | Drucker Playbook for Chanhassen 31
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item City Council Roundtable
File No.Item No: A.5
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
None
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
The quarterly roundtable is time for the City Council to discuss items of interest, propose new items for
review, and ask general questions of staff/each other. Items with interest from at least two
Councilmembers may be scheduled for research by staff, future work sessions, or other action as
appropriate.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
32
ATTACHMENTS
Roundtable Process Overview
Citizen Action Requests Year To Date
33
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
Roundtable Overviewand Guidelines
The quarterly roundtable is scheduled time for the City Council to discuss items of interest,
propose new items for review, and ask general questions of staff/each other. The roundtable
is designed to fill in the gaps between the annual Strategic Plan updates.
Staff will provide a one-year historical summary of the Citizen Action Request Forms
received in the packet for each roundtable.
Timing:
Quarterly, at a work session.
Procedure:
Submit items for consideration and publication in the council packet by noon on the Wednesday
prior to the meeting. Be prepared to give a brief overview of proposed items at the work session.
Actions:
The City Council should determine the next steps, using the following menu of options:
1. Do nothing at this time
2. Park for discussion during the Strategic Plan update in January
3. Request staff prepare an issue paper (requires two votes of support)
4. Refer to a commission for further consideration (requires two votes of support)
5. Schedule a city council work session (requires three votes of support)
CITY OF CHANHASSEN A Community
For Life.
34
2022 CITIZEN ACTION REQUESTSAs of Julyy 31, 2022Select the date of the City Council meeting you plan to attend to make your visitor presentation.First Name Last Name Address1 City State Zip Council Action Requested Summary of Information2/22/2022 JoAnn Syverson 489 Pleasantview Road Chanhassen MN 55317Restrict wake surfing in narrow channel of Lotus LakeRequest for a meeting to discuss ideas for the restriction. Discover what can be done to keep the narrow channel by the city park and beach environmentally secure. 2/28/2022 JoAnn Syverson 489 Pleasantview Road Chanhassen MN 55317I request wakesurfing to be restricted from the narrowest channel on Lotus Lake (431 feet wide). Area is directly in front of Carver Park, which has suffered extensive damage to its shoreline and sea wall. I will report on the University of Minnesota, St Anthony Falls Laboratory, Wake Research Project which has now been completed, peer‐reviewed, and published. It concludes that wakesurfing boats need to be 425‐500 feet from shore to have the same effects as a ski boat at 200 feet. Based on these conclusions, I am asking for a restriction on wake surfing in the narrowest section of Lotus Lake. 4/11/2022 Joseph Zasadzinski 536 Pleasant View Road Chanhassen MN 55317Restrict wavesurfing boats operation to the south end of Lotus Lake where water depths are greater than 15 feet to minimize disruption of the alum layer used to prevent phosphorus release to the lake waters. This should improve water quality and clarity and prevent algal blooms,Phosphorus is typically the limiting nutrient for algal growth in freshwater lakes in Minnesota. To reduce the release of phosphorus from the lake sediments, the city and water district applied alum to the lake in 2018. Alum forms a fluffy precipitate in water and settles to the bottom of the lake, where it forms a barrier to phosphorus release from the sediment. Disruption of this alum barrier causes more phosphorus to enter the lake water, increasing algal growth and the unsightly algal blooms seen in Lotus Lake the past few summers. Lotus Lake is also not in compliance with state rules on water quality and water clarity due to algal blooms due to the high phosphorus levels . Recent work by University of Minnesota scientists has shown that wakesurfing boats can stir up the lake bottom down to depths of 15 feet, disrupting the alum barrier and causing phosphorus release, algal blooms and decreased water quality. We propose to limit wakesurfing boats to areas of the lake with depths greater than 15 feet, which are mainly at the southern end of the lake near the boat launch ramp. The costs of this modification are minimal, and would only require placing semi‐permanent bouys in the lake to outline the lake area suitable for wakesurfing boats to operate.4/25/2022 Paul Granos 6663 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen MN 55317Installation of signs at public access on Lotus LakeSignage at Public Access reminding lake users of boating industry recommendations and visual distance markers along the drive to help gauge while on the waterSign 1: Wake ResponsiblySign(s) 2: Distance markers along drive for visual referenceInstall ASAP (BoaƟng season)Est Cost for signs and InstallaƟon = $2000 (If city funding is not available LLCA will fund)Boats that generate large wakes on Lotus have generated passionate discussions in recent years. In an effort to mitigate the emotions on this issue, the LLCA will be utilizing social media in an effort to educate boaters on the Water Sports Industry Association's recommendations. Signage at the landing will help communicate same to local and transient lake users.35
2022 CITIZEN ACTION REQUESTSAs of Julyy 31, 2022Select the date of the City Council meeting you plan to attend to make your visitor presentation.First Name Last Name Address1 City State Zip Council Action Requested Summary of Information4/25/2022 Paul Granos 6663 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen MN 55317Endorse LLCA Goose Management Plan for Lotus LakeLike other lakes and municipalities in our area, the LLCA would like the City to endorse our efforts to acquire a permit to control the Canadian Goose populaƟon on Lotus Lake. The LLCA has received many requests to assist in this effort by property owners. Docks, rafts, lawns and beaches have all been subject to the feces left by estimated 75‐100 Canadian Geese on the lake. In polling our membership, 66% of respondents were in favor of a goose populaƟon reducƟon effort. Any effort must include a licensed contractor and federal permit. We have completed the necessary paperwork and need the CIty of Chanhassen's approval before moving forward.The cost for trapping and removal on Lotus is esƟmated at $3000...a cost the LLCA will fundThe trapping would take place in June/July36
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Future Work Session Schedule
File No.Item No: A.6
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions:
August 22, 2022
1. 2023 Budget Overview and Initial CIP Discussion
September 12, 2022
1. Preliminary Levy Discussion
September 26, 2022
October 10, 2022
37
October 24, 2022
1. General Fund & Property Supported Funds Discussion
November 14, 2022
1. CIP, Debt & Utility Rate Study Discussion
BACKGROUND
Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting
agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 pm on the second and fourth Monday of
each month in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times
as needed.
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
38
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Approve City Council Minutes dated July 11, 2022
File No.Item No: D.1
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council minutes dated July 11, 2022."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes dated July 11, 2022
39
City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes dated July 11, 2022
40
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
JULY 11, 2022
Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge
of Allegiance.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman Campion, Councilwoman
Rehm, Councilwoman Schubert, Councilman McDonald.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None.
STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager;
Jerry Ruegemer, Park & Recreation Director; Andrea McDowell-Poehler, City Attorney;
Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk; and Erik Henricksen, Project
Engineer.
PUBLIC PRESENT:
Senior Commission members: Dorina Tipton, Linda Haight, Jerry Cerchia, Ruth Lunde.
David Scott Tipton
John Goodman, 915 Pleasant View Road
Zac Gleason, Hackamore Brewing Company, LLC
Charlie Hansen, Hansen Hometech
Gary Hansen, Hansen Hometech
David Miller, 420 Santa Fe Circle
Doug Hansen, 11969 North Shore Drive, Spicer, MN
Dan Phillips, Denali Custom Homes
Mayor Ryan asked the City Council if there were any modifications or additions to the agenda.
After the roll call vote there were no changes to the published agenda.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS:
1. Presentation of Maple Leaf Award to Dorina Tipton
Mayor Ryan invited Ms. Tipton to the front and read the following:
Dorina Tipton was appointed to the Senior Commission in April 2012. Although she volunteered
her time at numerous City events to serve the public, her most prominent accomplishment was
educating the community on the topic of dementia, a disease that does not discriminate. She
worked relentlessly with City staff, Carver County staff and the Senior Commission members to
establish an “ACT on Alzheimer’s” task force which included City residents, faith communities,
police officers, business owners and social services organizations. Today, Chanhassen is
41
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
2
recognized as a member of the “Dementia Friendly Community.” Dorina’s efforts were
instrumental in putting Chanhassen on the Dementia Friendly Communities map. She attended
training sessions and became a Dementia Friend Technician. She began training City Staff,
business and community members, volunteered to publicly speak on the topic, joined caregiver
support groups, and advocated to establish the Maple Café to host a monthly gathering of people
with Dementia and their caregivers. Dorina was always present as a volunteer to support this
group. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dorina made personal calls to the caregivers that
attended the Maple Café monthly events to check on them and ask if they needed anything. She
delivered Memory Kits to homes as well. November is “Alzheimer’s Awareness Month” and
each November, Dorina set up a table at the library with brochures. She also left her personal
name card for people to contact her with questions in case she wasn’t there in person and she
received multiple calls. Dorina’s other accomplishments include: Volunteering at numerous City
functions such as the 3rd of July Business Expo, Memorial Day fundraising for veterans, and
many other social and service programs. Volunteering at the 4th of July Bingo event sponsored
by the Senior Commission to benefit veterans. Volunteering her time at numerous City events to
serve as a greeter, server, or in any way she might be needed. Educated herself on topics to
better serve seniors by attending Older Adult Mental Health workshops. Walked the trails and
sidewalks of the City to make sure the elderly had enough time to cross streets where there were
traffic signals. Dorina, your support to the Senior Center and the community at large is evident
and these are just a few things that you did that made life better and more comfortable for our
community. You’ve been an instrumental and invaluable member of the Senior Commission. The
seniors in Chanhassen are very fortunate and honored to have had you on their team. We love
you. Thank you, Dorina.
2. Presentation honoring Councilman McDonald
Mayor Ryan noted one more presentation that is not on the Agenda. As many know, Councilman
McDonald was the 18th Annual Chanhassen Rotary’s Distinguished Award Recipient for 2022.
Beyond getting the unique opportunity to be the Grand Marshall in the 4th of July parade, this
award is given to a resident who has gone above and beyond in their service to others. Service
has always been a part of Councilman McDonald’s life from his service to our nation in the U.S.
Navy, extensive volunteerism with organizations in and around Chanhassen, and his tenure as a
City Councilman. He has given much of himself to improve the lives of those around him.
Thoughtful, intuitive, willing to challenge and ask the tough questions, Councilman McDonald is
known for working behind the scenes for those in need as he puts action behind his words. He is
a friend, a colleague, and an excellent Councilman. Mayor Ryan said on behalf of the rest of the
City Council, congratulations, Jerry, on this much-deserved award.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded
that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City
Manager’s recommendations:
1. Approve City Council Minutes dated June 27, 2022
42
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
3
2. Receive Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated May 24, 2022
3. Approve Claims Paid dated July 11, 2022
4.Resolution 2022-59:Appoint Election Judges for State Primary and General Elections and
Approve Rates of Pay
5.Resolution 2022-60:Approve Settlement Agreements for Parcels 11 and 15 as part of the
CSAH 101 Improvement Project
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Resolutions 2022-61 and 2022-62: Adopt a Resolution Vacating a Portion of Public
Drainage & Utility Easements within the Edwards Vogel Addition Plat; and Adopt a
Resolution Approving Preliminary and Final Plat for Goodman Homestead
Engineer Henricksen gave a presentation on the item noting the existing site is zoned single-
family and is serviced adequately by public sewer and water. The subdivision is the combination
of Outlot A with Lot 1. The Applicant consulted with Staff to construct a storage shed and the
location would have been over the property line without outlot A and Lot 1, both of which the
Applicant owns. To construct in a more usable location and save tree loss, the Applicant would
like to combine the lots to file for the building permit. The vacation is the six-foot drainage and
utility easement on the eastern property line which will be re-recorded when the lots are
combined. Staff has not received any comments from the public regarding the vacation or the
utilities and Staff supports the vacation. The Planning Commission reviewed the case on June 21,
2022 and voted 7-0 in favor.
Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing.
John Goodman thanked Mr. Henricksen and Mr. Generous for their help on the process. He
noted everything they are doing is within the existing fence and will allow them to build the shed
closer to the property line and allow them to keep a mature maple tree and oak tree.
Mayor Ryan closed the public hearing.
Councilman Campion moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council
adopt the Resolution approving the Goodman Homestead plat subject to the conditions of
approval; adopt the resolution approving the vacation of a portion of public drainage and
utility easements within the Edwards Vogel Addition as shown on the attached Exhibit A;
and adopt the Findings of Fact. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously
with a vote of 5 to 0.
43
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
4
2. Approve On-Sale Beer & Wine Liquor License for Tono Dakota, LLC doing business
as Tono Pizzeria & Cheesesteaks located at 190 Lake Drive East, Suite 110
Assistant City Manager Matt Unmacht gave a presentation on the item, noting the City received
a request from the Applicant for a new restaurant which will occupy approximately 2,700 square
feet. Tono Dakota, LLC consists of five partners (found in the Staff report) and have submitted a
certificate of insurance showing liquor liability and worker’s compensation which is required
prior to issuance of the liquor license. The public hearing notice was published on June 30 and
mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. Staff has not received any comments
from the public.
Councilman McDonald noted the owner of the property came to the City Council and was asked
to provide additional parking spaces; however, he has not seen a plan for that.
Ms. Aanenson replied the Applicant is waiting for approval from the Watershed District for the
stormwater management plan. She does not anticipate any problems with the Watershed District.
Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing.
Antonio Gambino, Applicant, noted it is pretty basic as they sell pizza and cheese steaks, and
beer and wine are a complement to the food and are a small portion of sales.
Mayor Ryan closed the public hearing.
Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council
approves an On-Sale Beer and Wine Liquor License for Tono Dakota, LLC doing business
as Tono Pizzeria and Cheesesteaks located at 190 Lake Drive East, Suite 100. All voted in
favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
GENERAL BUSINESS
1. Ordinance 693: Approve the Hackamore Brewing Code Amendment Request
Ms. Aanenson noted this item appeared before the Planning Commission on June 21, 2022 and is
a request for a brewery and taproom with a limited menu. Currently taprooms are permitted but
the restaurant portion is not. The requested change would be to allow a commercial kitchen
accessory to a taproom. She walked through the Staff Assessment including concern over
conversion of industrial to commercial, older buildings not always desirable for modern uses,
and she noted Staff does not believe it would be negatively impacting the surrounding area. Ms.
Aanenson clarified the difference between a brewery (selling their own beer) and a brew pub
(selling all types of beer and/or cocktails). Staff recommends approval of the change and feels
based on the plans it fits in the scale of the building and location.
44
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
5
Zac Gleason, founder of Hackamore Brewing, stated it is a dream of his to have an upscale,
elevated brewery. The plan is to have fun amenities including a full-sized golf simulator, a stage
for music and night-life, and a full merchandise shop. He noted this will be a unique product and
the food is a large piece of the business plan with a smaller menu of food including elevated pub
fare such as burgers, chicken wings, chicken sandwiches, as he does not want people to leave the
establishment when they get hungry.
Ms. Aanenson noted the Applicant had a very nice business plan and she was happy when they
chose this location as they had looked in a number of different communities.
Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council
adopts the attached ordinance amending Chapter 20 of the City Code, concerning
permitted accessory uses in the Industrial Office Park District (IOP). All voted in favor and
the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
2. Santa Vera Residential Development Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Amendment
Ms. Aanenson noted this item appeared before the Planning Commission on June 21, 2022 and
the request is to amend a Concept PUD for a mixed-use development. The site currently has an
apartment building and the Applicant is looking at expanding. The site is guided to allow up to
16 units/acre but has a PUD that restricts that number. Currently there is an 18-unit apartment on
site with a detached garage which is served by City sewer and water. Ms. Aanenson shared about
the PUD noting in 1999 they subdivided the parcel to provide additional park space to the City
which is now a ballfield and was rezoned at that time from R-12 to PUD-R. In the PUD it stated
another 30-unit apartment building would be allowed for a total of 48 units. In 2012 City Staff
went through all the downtown PUDs and all had different standards so Staff tried to codify
those. The Applicant came before the Planning Commission with a schematic looking at 30-35
apartment units in a three-story building, five single-family homes, six town homes, and eight
units added onto the existing unit on site. She noted it went over the density maximum and there
were many concerns from neighbors regarding height of buildings, mix of different types of
product, and visual impacts.
Mr. Henricksen shared this was a conceptual PUD and it is clear that the site would enact many
Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed rules and City rules regarding storm water management
practices. Because of the minimal or deficient stormwater treatment in the area, Staff feels in
order to offset the intensification of the site use it would be a reasonable request to have more
than what is standard stormwater treatment which has been relayed to the Applicant. It could
mean a potential 50% increase over what they would have to do by the letter of rules for the
Watershed and City Ordinances. There are City records that show two small wetlands on the
south side of the site and the delineation will have to be updated. Mr. Henricksen spoke about
site access, residents’ traffic concerns and traffic safety, a required traffic study, and on-site
circulation with adequate turnaround for emergency services.
45
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
6
Ms. Aanenson noted the Applicant has said they are not sure 30 units is a viable option, noting
they have brought a number of projects to the City which were not sustainable. In order for the
Applicant to receive feedback they need to go through the concept process. The goal tonight is
non-binding feedback for the Applicant. Ms. Aanenson noted the Planning Commission voted 4
to 3 and had some questions. She clarified that there is a revised plan since the Applicant came
before the Planning Commission. Currently it shows a reduction in units to a 30-34 unit
apartment three-story building with four single-family homes, four town homes, and they would
keep the existing building without adding additional units but re-facing the building to update it.
She showed the initial and revised concepts on screen, noting they are asking for an additional 12
units and to allow some single-family homes and town homes which Ms. Aanenson feels is a
nice transition into the neighborhood.
Mayor Ryan noted the City Council has received and read through the minutes from the Planning
Commission as well as from the Applicant. While this is not a public hearing, she welcomes any
new information.
Councilman McDonald has not seen a mix like this within this size of an area and asked what
price points they are looking at, noting the current apartments are affordable.
Ms. Aanenson replied the City did not ask the Applicants to make anything affordable or
subsidized and deferred to the Applicant.
Mayor Ryan noted the traffic concerns and asked about the determination of public and private
streets when looking at Del Rio and Laredo Drives.
Mr. Henricksen replied Staff would support a proposed private street. If the Applicant proposed a
public street it does not necessarily meet some of the requirements they would typically want to
see. One benefit of a private street is that it should also enhance or protect some of the natural
resources. While the concept plan looks fairly built out, the Applicant has expressed a desire to
save some of the trees in the area to allow a more “built-in” or established feel.
Mayor Ryan asked about trail improvements and keeping a park feel to the site.
Ms. Aanenson clarified in the PUD those standards would be put in, and the form will first come
out where the wetlands are that would shape preservation of trees, and after that the City would
look at the type of product, rooflines, sightlines, and how they would be viewed from the exterior
of the site.
Mayor Ryan acknowledged traffic, Chanhassen Elementary, and the challenge in living in those
neighborhoods for drop off and pick up times, as well as entrances and exits in the area.
46
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
7
Mr. Henricksen noted many things will be flushed out within the traffic study, and there are
certain guidelines that will come forth. He said many of the resident comments were noted at the
Planning Commission and would be directed to the third-party traffic study firm.
Mayor Ryan invited the Applicant forward.
Charlie, Doug, and Jerry Hansen, Hansen Hometech, approached the podium and spoke about
the project. Doug Hansen noted the original plot had 8-10 other apartments in 1978 and the
family donated the Hansen field (ball field).
Charlie Hansen stated he lives in the community and has a 5 and 8-year-old that play in those
woods. He understands the traffic issues, he loves Chanhassen, and is the President of the
farmer’s market. He noted they are neighbors and are here to build something that fits the
community and they believe the town houses fit and provide some buffer to the apartment
building which will help the community. Mr. Hansen shared they revised the plan and he has
gone to some barbeques with neighbors and has been in direct contact with them to make sure
the plan fits the community.
Councilman McDonald noted this is an unusual layout for a lot. He asked if the current
apartments are affordable housing and whether the new apartments would also be affordable.
Mr. Hansen replied the new apartments would be market rate and in looking at traffic studies
they are looking at two of the three floors potentially being 55 or older. This would be part of the
strategy to have a little less density with traffic, especially in the morning, noting moving the
demographic may ease some of the morning bus and school traffic. Mr. Hansen said they want to
avoid the cookie cutter development and make it feel organic while keeping the tree cover to
keep a buffer with the school and park.
Mayor Ryan again noted the Council read comments from the Planning Commission meeting but
if anyone made the effort to come this evening she welcomes them to come forward.
David Miller thinks this is one of the greatest con jobs he has ever seen. He spoke about a
previous street project where they wanted to put flower beds in the circles and finally the City
Council got rid of the idiot that was trying to do that, and the Fire Chief said how can they do it?
Mr. Miller thinks this is the same thing happening here and is absolutely unbelievable. His
children walked to school and they cannot tell him with all those people there will not be traffic
problems. That is overdoing a lot that size, period. He is shocked that the City Council will
consider this as it is unbelievable. He said perhaps four-, five-, or six-family homes in there but a
three-story building? He is sorry but this is not right and it is time for people to say enough is
enough. He asked is there another 2-3 story building in this area? No. He asked the City Council
to look into their minds and hearts, and say enough is enough and change it. He would agree with
it if it was single-family homes but not this.
47
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
8
Mayor Ryan asked if anyone else wanted to come forward with comments. There were no
additional comments. Mayor Ryan asked Ms. Aanenson if this were to go forward, what is the
level of discretion the City Council has, and what can and cannot be changed.
Ms. Aanenson said the Hansen family owned the property over here (noted on screen) and had
entitlements to do 300 apartment units. She stated they still have approval to do a 30-unit
apartment building as that is what the PUD currently states. She said the Hansens are looking for
permission to add the additional townhomes and single-family homes.
Mayor Ryan clarified without any changes to the PUD as it is today the Hansens could move
forward with an additional 30-unit apartment building on the site.
Ms. Aanenson replied that is correct, and they would have to come through site plan approval.
The Hansens are asking for an additional 12 units and for single-family homes. She noted the
City could have them do a PUD and modify that when there are controls over the traffic,
architectures, whether they want senior housing, and those are things the City Council could
incorporate.
Ms. Hokkanen shared the Hansens are asking for up to four additional apartment units (between
30-34 units); they have approval for the 30 or they have the entitlement for the four single-family
homes and four townhomes. The 12 units are made up of all three product types.
Mayor Ryan noted entitlement is a legal definition. She asked at what stage does this come back
for further comment, question, or clarification.
Ms. Aanenson said the concept PUD is not legally binding to any party but in good-faith the City
is trying to give the Applicant direction. Staff has put a laundry list of things they would need to
move forward, the Applicant has heard from the Planning Commission and have already
modified their plans. Now they are waiting to hear from the City Council and will determine how
to move forward based on those comments. It would go back to the Planning Commission for a
public hearing and the City Council would have final say at the next approval process.
Doug Hansen noted the first house he built was 7601 and they sold it for just under $20,000 as a
three-bedroom rambler with a double garage and brick veneer. He noted times have changed and
they are trying to do something to finish the land that he owns, and to make it look good and fit
with the neighborhood which is why they had a few single-family homes in there. He stated they
are open to getting something done and finishing what they can do with the land. He noted it
originally allowed for ten 8-unit buildings (80 units) before they donated or sold the land for the
ball park. He noted they want to do something that is good for the City and would not do
anything that is bad for the City.
48
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
9
Councilman McDonald would be interested in seeing more detail and how the Applicant would
address some of the issues the PUD would bring up. With more detail he could render better
judgment as to whether they could proceed. He does not think building an apartment building
would be good; he thinks it would be better to have more of a home structure and he appreciates
trying to keep the trees and keep it as a livable lot with a home people could be proud of. Mr.
McDonald thinks what they are looking at building would improve the value of the
neighborhood, and he is concerned with the traffic surrounding the school. He would like more
detail on how the Applicants would make it a community, how it would all play together, and
how it will affect the neighborhoods around them.
Councilwoman Rehm agrees with Councilman McDonald and while it needs to be flushed out
more, she is in favor of adding housing. The idea of building something more people could enjoy
makes sense and she is interested in hearing about the neighborhood park. She is concerned
about traffic but noted that is a concern throughout the City and hopefully that could be
addressed in the next iteration. She is in favor of moving forward in looking at the next step.
Councilman Campion agrees with the Councilmembers and would like to see more detail before
approving anything concrete. The concept is interesting and he is not ruling it out at this point.
Councilwoman Schubert is interested in learning more, especially if the Council does not have a
say over the 30 units. Traffic will be an issue one way or another and she is glad to hear traffic
studies will be done and wants to make sure the City does what they can to mitigate traffic. In
reading through the Planning Commission minutes she appreciated people who live locally,
wanting to design and make sure it fits the neighborhood versus another developer coming in and
saying they will build what they want to build because they can. She appreciates the Hansens’
willingness to work with the City and go back to the drawing board and their willingness to find
creative solutions to problems. She would like to hear more details.
Mayor Ryan agrees with the City Council on moving forward and shares the concerns regarding
traffic, tree preservation, the landscape, and transition from the existing neighborhoods. She
recognizes height as a concern and does not know if a two-story apartment building is an option
and then to change up some of the mixing. She understands the financial component and asked to
explore whether three stories on a hill works in that location. The revitalization of that corner is
exciting and Mayor Ryan thinks it helps the continued growth and reinvestment in that area of
Chanhassen. Overall she supports it but would like to see the next stage and design elements that
go with it. She agrees it is nice to have someone local and that benefits the community.
Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council
approves the direction of mixed housing types, issues and concerns in the Planning
Commission Staff Report for the concept Planned Unit Development, and comments made
by the City Council this evening. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously
with a vote of 5 to 0.
49
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
10
1. Request for Agreement for the Issuance of Building Permit Before Demolition of
Existing House - 2961 Washta Bay Court
Ms. Aanenson noted this is not a formal application but was requested by the property owners.
They are requesting to keep the existing house as they are building the new house. The City does
not allow two houses on one lot; the existing house will be demolished when the new house is
finished and the owners are willing to offer escrow to ensure. Staff understands the owner’s
desire and shared the City has entered into this agreement three times previously and in one
instance the dwelling was not removed. The City Attorney has noted that due to issues with non-
compliance another city no longer enters into these agreements. If the City moves forward, Staff
recommendations include the building permit will not be issued unless the new home complies
with all zoning and building requirements; the certificate of occupancy for the new home will not
be issued until a demolition permit has been issued for the old home; the owners will have 30
days to move into the new home and demolish the existing house upon issuance of the certificate
of occupancy; the owners will provide the City with an escrow for 110% of the estimated cost of
demolishing the home to be held until the demolition is complete.
Councilwoman Rehm asked if a timeline is established.
Ms. Aanenson noted it could take nine months to a year.
Councilman McDonald asked how far the City went to enforce the agreement with the house that
was not demolished previously.
Ms. Aanenson is not sure they put escrow on it and thinks the City was reluctant to hire someone
to go pull down a structure on someone else’s property.
Councilman McDonald’s concern is the follow-through as someone may give up the escrow to
keep both houses. He is somewhat in favor of doing this but also wants to make sure the City has
all the assurances and legal pieces in place so there is a method going forward. He wants to see
legal fees built in and while he wants the Applicant to be able to do it he also wants to make it as
painful as possible if they do not comply. In other communities it always comes down to
enforcement.
Councilman Campion asked if the homeowner wanted to subdivide into two lots, is there
anything stopping them.
Ms. Aanenson noted it is a very narrow lot so to subdivide they would need a variance.
Dan Phillips, on behalf of the home owner, said initially the home owner looked at subdividing
but at this point they are just looking to stay in the existing house while building the other house.
If they need to sign something regarding attorney fees he is willing and has given the City
Attorney a signed contract with the demolition company, he can write a binding contract with the
50
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
11
demolition company, or pull the permit ahead of time. Mr. Phillips said it is going to cost
$60,000-80,000 to move out of their house and build another house on a property they already
own and pay taxes on which seems little ridiculous because of an enforcement issue once in the
past. He shared they will knock the house down when they are finished.
The Council discussed adding language about paying the City’s attorney fees.
Ms. Hokkanen wants to make the record clear: if the City gives this approval and the home
owner chooses not to demolish the home on their own within 30 days of being issued the
Certificate of Occupancy, the City would then go out, hire a demolition contractor, and pursue
demolishing a private home on private property. She wants to say it that clearly because it would
be very unusual. For future Councilmembers, she wants it to be clear that this City Council
understood that was a course the City would be willing to take and wrote the agreement to ensure
that the City had that right and protection in terms of costs. If the City ended up in that position,
they indeed intend to act on it.
Councilman McDonald noted a step in between: that the City would go to court to get a
judgment based on the contract that was signed. It is not that the City has decided it will enter
private property and tear down a house, they will enter into property they are allowed to enter
and tear down a house. That is why he wants to make it painful enough so the City can take that
action. They are granting a waiver and he wants to have assurances that the waiver is upheld.
Mayor Ryan noted this is a big ask of City Council and it would have been great if the home
owners had attended tonight and make the ask themselves. It is putting the City in a challenging
situation as they want to allow property owners to live in their house but long term it poses a
potentially difficult situation. While the Council wants to support the resident they also want to
protect the overall City and noted other residents will look at this and look at what they think
they can do on their property. She clarified that is why they must be careful and if approved she
hopes the homeowners understand the seriousness of the issue and that the City Council is
putting faith in their commitment to demolish the house.
Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Schubert seconded that the City Council
approves the agreement allowing owners to stay in the current home while a new home is
being constructed at 2961 Washta Bay Court; and with the addition of comments
concerning restrictions and guarantees discussed at the City Council meeting. All voted in
favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS.
Mayor Ryan thanked Mr. Ruegemer for his staff’s amazing execution of the 4th of July
celebration. Everyone had extraordinarily positive feedback, with great numbers and fun events.
She understands the time involved in planning and thanked the Rotary Club and the many
business partners who support the event.
51
City Council Minutes – July 11, 2022
12
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS.
1. Response from Republic Services
Ms. Hokkanen noted a response in the packet from Republic Services. She spoke with the
municipal sales manager who was able to provide good data about what is going on in
Chanhassen. From Republic’s perspective any service issues experienced have to do with yard
waste and in the letter it talks about the approach they are taking. The manager has committed to
share service updates with the City. Ms. Hokkanen said if residents are experiencing trash or
recycling issues they need to follow up directly with Republic so they have that data.
CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None.
Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Schubert seconded to adjourn the meeting.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City
Council meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen
City Manager
Prepared by Kim Meuwissen
City Clerk
52
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
MINUTES
JULY 11, 2022
Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman McDonald, Councilman
Campion, Councilwoman Rehm, Councilman McDonald, and Councilwoman Schubert.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None.
STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager;
Charlie Howley, City Engineer/Public Works Director; Don Johnson, Fire Chief; Jerry
Ruegemer, Park & Recreation Director; Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director; Danielle Washburn,
Interim Finance Director; Rick Rice, IT Manager; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk.
PUBLIC PRESENT:None.
Mayor Ryan called the Work Session to order at 5:30 p.m.
2023 PRELIMINARY BUDGET FINANCIAL PLAN DISCUSSION
City Manager Laurie Hokkanen presented a slide showing the 2022 assessment summary,
followed by future projections from the 2022 budget as well as an estimated impact of the
projected 2023 levy. Ms. Hokkanen explained that employee services is the bulk of the levy
impact, which includes implementation of the pay plan, health insurance costs, and adding three
firefighters.
Funding Major Projects
Ms. Hokkanen reviewed possible timelines for constructing the Lake Ann Preserve, construction
of a civic campus, a Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) Referendum, and programming of
identified park priorities.
Lake Ann Preserve – 2023-2024
Ms. Hokkanen presented the potential design and construction schedule for the project as well as
proposed funding sources which included the Pavement Management Program (PMP) Fund for
bituminous trails, American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), Fund Balance, and Park Dedication Fees.
An alternative would be a $10M bond issue for a 10-year term with first payment in 2024.
Chanhassen Civic Campus (new City Hall and associated park improvements)
Ms. Hokkanen presented a potential design and construction schedule of this project as well as a
2026 levy increase and debt payment scenario. Another option would be to pursue a Local
Option Sales Tax (LOST) referendum for 2023.
53
City Council Work Session Minutes – July 11, 2022
2
Following her presentation, Ms. Hokkanen provided the following list of questions for Council
to consider and provide staff with direction:
Does this plan fund the major priorities in a desired time?
Are the financial impacts acceptable?
Should we move forward with the Lake Ann Preserve Project I the near term?
Should we schedule a design workshop with our commissions to further consider and
refine civic campus plans?
Should we engage the University of Minnesota for a LOST study?
The next Parks Referendum Task Force meeting is Monday, July 18. What direction
should be given for next steps?
Mayor Ryan asked Council to provide comments or concerns to the increase in Employee
Services.
Mayor Ryan started the discussion by asking if the predetermined Cost of Living Adjustment
(COLA) amount of 2.5% should be reconsidered. Councilman Campion asked what the 2022
COLA amount was. Ms. Hokkanen replied that it was 2.5%. Councilman McDonald asked for
clarification of the $800,000 CIP savings. Ms. Hokkanen explained that the primary response
engine at Fire Station 2 is at the end of its useful life and needs to be replaced in 2023; however,
if we were to transition Fire Station 2 from an active fire station to leasing to Ridgeview for an
ambulance bay, we would not have a need to replace the engine. Fire Chief Johnson added that
the amount to replace the engine at Fire Station 2 was actually higher than $800,000. Laurie also
addressed the cost of the deferred maintenance that would be needed at Fire Station 2.
Mayor Ryan reiterated her desire to discuss the proposed COLA. Councilman Campion asked
about the surplus reported in the 2021 audit and where it came from. Ms. Hokkanen replied that
the surplus was to some degree a result of building permit revenue. Councilman Campion to see
a summary of the building permit projections for 2023. Ms. Hokkanen stated that right now we
are forecasting to be on target. Councilman Campion also stated that he is open to considering
increasing the COLA.
In addition to the COLA Mayor Ryan asked the Council about the $30,000 to hire three new
captains. Ms. Hokkanen stated that the Council doesn’t need to provide detail at this time, but do
they support seeing the plan in a draft budget. Councilman Campion asked for clarification that
hiring three new firefighters would need to be hired in order to close Fire Station 2. Ms.
Hokkanen replied yes. Councilman Campion asked how our Fire Department compares in size to
neighboring communities. Chief Johnson responded that we are right in the ballpark. The more
full-time firefighters we have, the more stable Fire Department staffing will be. Councilman
Campion asked would there be future adjustments to the number of full-time firefighters needed
in the future. Chief Johnson replied that employee stability would reduce response time and
increase longevity and that it would be years before we would have to worry about adding more
firefighters. Also, paid-on-call local part-time firefighters are hard to find and retain.
Councilwoman Schubert was in favor of doing what needs to be done to close down Fire Station
2 but is unsure of a larger COLA increase in addition to step increases; however, she understands
54
City Council Work Session Minutes – July 11, 2022
3
we need to be competitive in order to retain employees. Councilman McDonald would like more
information on what comparable cities are offering for COLA. Ms. Hokkanen said staff would
gather that information and present it at a future work session. Councilman McDonald asked
about the 15% increase for health insurance. Ms. Hokkanen responded that our current carrier
has paid out more than what it has received in premiums. Councilwoman Rehm also supported
the Fire Department staffing plan and transitioning out of Fire Station 2. Councilwoman
Schubert asked about the funding sources for the Lake Ann Preserve project, specifically using
Pavement Management Program (PMP) funds for trails not adjacent to streets. Will we risk
future street improvement projects not being fully funded. She likes the idea of using ARPA
funds for the project. Mayor Ryan expressed appreciation of looking at all the funding sources
but is also concerned about using PMP funds for the Lake Ann Preserve trails, especially with
our current road rehabilitation needs. Mayor Ryan is reluctant to move forward with a
referendum this year. If we are going to do a park referendum, there needs to be more robust and
their needs to be further discussion; however, she supports using ARPA funds to move forward
with the Lake Ann Preserve project. Councilwoman Schubert agreed that we should use the
funds we have to get started and postpone the referendum to allow more time for options.
Councilman Campion agreed that the referendum should be postponed a year or two.
Councilman McDonald is in favor of taking care of the Lake Ann Preserve but it needs to be
prioritized with other City needs. He asked about how ARPA funds can be spent. Ms. Hokkanen
replied that we can use it for a wide variety of things, but the Lake Ann Preserve would
definitely qualify. Councilman McDonald also thought the referendum should be delayed. Could
ARPA funds be used to offset employee services. Ms. Hokkanen replied yes. Councilman
McDonald doesn’t think we can ask residents for $5M just for Lake Ann and we should
prioritize what is really needed. Councilwoman Rehm agreed that the referendum this year
would be rushed but believes that people really want to see the Lake Ann Preserve project
proceed and is in support of getting the project started.
Ms. Hokkanen asked Council about moving forward with the civic campus plans. Mayor Ryan
brought up the local sales tax option and Council agreed to move forward with the study.
Councilman Campion asked if there is a large cost to produce the plan. Ms. Hokkanen replied
that that the study costs $3,500. If the Council chooses to move forward with the LOST, staff
will contact the University of Minnesota to start the study and recent trends show that there
would be a good chance that the voters would go for it and that the legislature would approve it.
Mayor Ryan asked Council if we should move forward with a design workshop to further
consider and refine civic campus plans. Ms. Hokkanen suggested bringing all of the
commissions together with the City Council and a consultant for a design workshop before
presenting it to the public. Councilman McDonald is in favor of moving forward with this.
Councilman Campion agreed and suggested creating a separate task force and engaging
commercial aspects and partnerships. Councilwoman Rehm concurs with Councilman Campion.
Councilwoman Schubert concurs as well. Mayor Ryan directed staff to move forward with
scheduling a design workshop for a civic campus with the City Council and all of the
commissions.
PARK REFERENDUM UPDATE
Item discussed as part of the previous item discussion.
55
City Council Work Session Minutes – July 11, 2022
4
FUTURE WORK SESSION SCHEDULE
July 25:Traffic Safety Committee Presentation
Short-Term Rentals
City Council Roundtable
August 8:2023 Budget Overview and Initial CIP Discussion
September 12: Preliminary Levy Discussion
October 24:General Fund & Property Supported Funds Discussion
November 14: CIP, Debt & Utility Rate Study Discussion
The work session adjourned at 6:53 p.m.
Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen
City Manager
Prepared by Kim Meuwissen
City Clerk
56
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Receive Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated June 21, 2022
File No.Item No: D.2
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Jean Steckling, Sr. Admin Support Specialist
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council receives the Planning Commission meeting minutes dated June 21,
2022."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
57
Planning Commission Minutes dated June 21, 2022
58
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
JUNE 21, 2022
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman von Oven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Eric Noyes, Mark von Oven, Erik Johnson, Perry Schwartz, Ryan
Soller, Edward Goff, and Kelsey Alto.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; MacKenzie Young-
Walters, Associate Planner; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer.
PUBLIC PRESENT:
Zach Gleason Hackamore Brewing Co.
Mike Werth
John Goodman 915 Pleasant View Road
Charlie & Gary Hansen Hansen HomeTech
Stefan Szalkiewicz 511 Del Rio Drive
Jeanne Waslosky 517 Laredo Lane
Charles Littfin 7609 Laredo Drive
Dave Buckholz 7541 Chippewa Trail
Christina Ahola 7496 Saratoga
Derek Mellot 7501 Chippewa Trail
Thomas Wilmer 517 Del Rio Drive
Keely Unrue 7501 Chippewa Trail
Gordy Nagel 514 Del Rio Drive
PUBLIC HEARING:
HACKAMORE BREWING CODE AMENDMENT REQUEST
Associate Planner Young-Walters gave a presentation on the item, noting there are two ways a
Code amendment can happen. First is that staff of City Council observe something they would
like to change and second is when a resident or business requests the City change the Code. The
Hackamore Brewing Company has requested the City amend the industrial office park district.
The applicant is proposing to put a brewery and taproom at Lake Drive East and Dell Road.
Currently, City Code allows breweries and taprooms in the area but restaurants are not permitted
and this would prevent them from having a commercial kitchen. One reason the City does not
allow restaurants in the industrial office park district is because they do not want commercial
uses there; however they recognize that older industrial buildings are not always as desirable for
modern industrial uses and have become more flexible with what is allowed in those districts.
Staff does not believe there is a significant impact in allowing an accessory kitchen versus what
is currently on the site and do not believe this would negatively impact the district. In response to
this request, staff is proposing to allow commercial kitchens in conjunction with taprooms and
cocktail rooms as accessory uses in the Industrial Office Park district. Proposed conditions
include the businesses would not be eligible for on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses (hard liquor
59
Planning Commission Minutes – June 21, 2022
2
or beer not brewed on-site), must be accessory to a taproom or cocktail room, and the brewery
must be licensed as a brew pub. Mr. Young-Walters has not received public comment on the
item.
Chairman von Oven asked if it is subjective in someone saying they are a brewery first and a
restaurant second.
Mr. Young-Walters replied staff would look at the floor plan being submitted and if they saw
500 square feet dedicated to production and 2,000 square feet dedicated to the commercial
kitchen, there would be a conversation noting the kitchen is not accessory. Regarding these plans
it was clearly a brewery first and restaurant second.
Commissioner Alto asked why the City wants to keep commercial industrial second.
Mr. Young-Walters replied that looking at how the City has guided its land uses, it has made
very deliberate choices to concentrate commercial in the City’s downtown area and some
secondary commercial corridors for neighborhood support retail. Avienda is the one deviation
from that. The goal is to have a vibrant downtown and keep those businesses healthy. He noted
there are parking standards designed for industrial uses, and commercial uses tend to have higher
turnover and traffic volumes, which the streets in those areas are not designed for. He also noted
the benefits to the City’s tax and employment base to preventing the displacement of industrial
users.
Commissioner Goff has been to other establishments that use industrial spaces and parking
becomes an issue and there is a lot of traffic. How would the City prevent having two or three of
these next to each other?
Mr. Young-Walters noted staff told the brewery in the beginning they would need to demonstrate
that they can meet parking, which was shown. If another brewery went into the next building,
they would not be able to demonstrate the parking standards and that is a protection.
Zac Gleason, founder of Hackamore Brewing Company, noted they are looking to be a bit
different than an everyday brewery by being more upscale and elevated. He is working with an
award-winning builder and they will focus on upscale amenities including golf simulators, a
stage for live music, a pro shop with apparel, and he would like food as it will keep people in
their seats for a longer time. He would like to have a small, focused menu such as a burger,
chicken wings, and french fries.
Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. There were no public comments.
Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Noyes seconded that the Planning Commission
recommends the City Council adopt the attached ordinance amending Chapter 20 of the
City Code concerning permitted accessory uses in the Industrial Office Park District (IOP).
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0.
60
Planning Commission Minutes – June 21, 2022
3
PUBLIC HEARING:
915 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD REPLAT
Senior Planner Bob Generous gave the staff report noting the item is a replat and while it is
considered a subdivision there are no additional lots being created; rather there is one lot being
created out of a lot and an outlot. The property is zoned single-family residential and the
applicant is trying to combine the current lot with Outlot A in the Vinewood Addition. As a
condition of approval and with the final plat, the applicant will be vacating an easement and
dedicating a new easement for drainage and utilities. Staff recommends approval subject to the
conditions of approval. Mr. Generous has not received public comments on the item.
Mike Werth is representing the homeowner and said currently the house is over the setback. He
showed plans on screen and explained the design choice.
John Goodman stated everything is already inside of his fence and he is trying to combine them
because he would like to build a small garden shed. Because they cannot put the shed on an
outlot, it must be 22 feet inside the property which would result in taking down a large oak tree
and a large maple tree.
Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. There were no public comments.
Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Alto said to save the trees.
Commissioner Noyes thinks it makes perfect sense.
Commissioner Noyes moved, Commissioner Goff seconded that the Chanhassen Planning
Commission recommends approval of the replat for Goodman Homestead subject to the
conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. All voted in
favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0.
PUBLIC HEARING:
SANTA VERA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PUD AMENDMENT
Senior Planner Bob Generous gave the staff report, stating this is a 2022 development project
and they currently have property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and permits an
additional 30-unit apartment building. The concept plan review allows the applicant to come in
and put different proposals forward without doing the expensive engineering work and then find
out the proposal would or would not go forward. It allows them to shake out the project and see
what is acceptable to the City and community before coming up with an actual development
plan. Staff review provided an outline of the issues they would need to address if they were to
move forward and also received comments from the neighborhood. Mr. Generous said the
property is zoned PUD-Residential and would permit an additional 30 apartment units. He noted
the existing site has an 18-unit apartment building and the concept plan proposes 30-35
additional apartment units in a separate building, five single-family homes, six townhomes, and
an additional eight units added to the existing 18 units on the site.
61
Planning Commission Minutes – June 21, 2022
4
Project Engineer Erik Henricksen shared about drainage and grading, noting stormwater runoff
generally drains from west to east and must be maintained. Currently, there are no existing
stormwater infrastructures or BMPs on the site as in the 1970’s when the site was developed
there were no robust regulations. Based on the concept plans it would appear the applicant would
need to meet requirements for water quality, extraction, volume control, and rate control. He
spoke about street access, pedestrian routes, and a traffic impact study requirement.
Mr. Generous shared about building permit requirements specifically addressing the existing
building. Should the applicant add a third-story to the existing building, they would need to bring
the entire building up to compliance with current Building Code, Fire Code, and parking
standard requirements. Mr. Generous received an email which he has distributed from Amy
Anderson whose concerns were safety regarding the traffic and pedestrian circulation on the site,
as well as the size and scope of the development on the site, and hardcover. Mr. Generous
received a phone call from a gentleman who was concerned and opposed to the project due to the
high density and tree removal. He also received a response from a woman concerned about
traffic and pedestrian safety concerns due to the traffic from the school and ball fields, as well as
being opposed to the high density and tree removal. Staff recommends receiving feedback from
the public.
Commissioner Schwartz asked if the City requires that developers include any green building
components in construction.
Mr. Generous noted there are no specific requirements but they can encourage that. It has not
been a policy decision from City Council.
Commissioner Noyes noted the five single-family homes have detached garages due to the
narrow lot sizes, and asked if there is a standard for that within the City.
Mr. Generous replied it is not a standard and City ordinance requires a minimum two-car garage
for every dwelling unit but does not specify attached or detached.
Commissioner Schwartz asked if staff shares any concerns of the resident feedback received
regarding density of the site.
Mr. Generous stated consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is one of the issues. As proposed,
this would be at 18.25 units per acre and the Comprehensive Plan says a maximum of 16 units
per acre. Traffic is also a concern from staff and they want it to be studied. Regarding tree
removal, staff is aware that it happens and they also want to be sure hardcover and stormwater is
adequately addressed.
Commissioner Schwartz asked why the developer would propose a development in excess of the
City’s density requirements.
Mr. Generous replied to see if it would be acceptable to the City.
Charlie Hansen approached the podium and noted his grandfather purchased the land around this
area in 1963 and many of the homes in the neighborhood were a result of that development. He
62
Planning Commission Minutes – June 21, 2022
5
noted the original proposal was to add another apartment building, pave much of it, and add
garages which would cut down many trees and not make it one with the neighborhood. Instead,
they would like to do a mixed development to allow it to blend more with the neighborhood and
he clarified they would not be cutting down the trees. Mr. Hansen clarified part of the reason for
the detached garages is to be able to move them a bit to save tree cover.
Gary Hansen shared history noting his father tried to do this in 1978, 2004, 2014, and now they
are here in 2022. Previously the PUD limited it to 24 units and now it sounds like the Met
Council wants more density in Chanhassen which is why the Hansens are looking at what the
maximum is. He noted it is a concept and they are not trying to shoehorn things in. The trees
lining the elementary school will stay and the rest is mostly open field and gravel. He noted they
are looking at changing the PUD for a little more density and they would like to soften the
entrance with single-family and town homes before the apartment building.
Commissioner Noyes noted staff brought up many good points in the report and asked if the
Hansens have thought about stormwater management, erosion, wetland issues, updating the
sewer, bringing the current apartment building up to date and whether that is already included in
their plan.
Charlie Hansen replied they have had a lot of great suggestions from staff, noting green building
practices are important to them, including underground cisterns to reserve water on site and
reusing it in irrigation. They are looking at semi-permeable surfaces so there is less runoff, the
possibility of green roofs, and many other aspects.
Gary Hansen spoke about traffic control including a one-way road as they do not want extra
people going toward the school during drop-off and pick-up times.
Charlie Hansen stated they are asking for mixed-use as the site is currently zoned for the existing
apartment building. He noted they are spending more to put in underground parking so it blends
with the neighborhood. He spoke about updates to the current apartment building on site which is
already happening.
Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing.
Stefan Szalkiewicz lives four houses across the street from the development and noted change is
inevitable and the applicant has the right to try to do what they want with the property. His
concern is traffic and he shared he is getting married soon and hopes to have kids. He is a little
nervous to have kids playing in the road, especially because Del Rio does not have a sidewalk.
Jeanne Waslosky lives in a cul-de-sac and her backyard overlooks the existing apartments. She
noted it just seems like a lot to put in there, and there would be more traffic. She would also be
concerned about how long it would take, as well as the construction noise.
Charles Littfin lives across the street from the elementary school and asked if any of the
Commissioners live on Laredo Drive or Santa Vera. He stated right now they have sports
happening and Santa Vera is down to one-lane because police do not monitor the no parking
signs. He asked if they are planning a traffic study, noting hopefully it will be while the school is
open and not during the summer. This is a huge concern of Mr. Littfin’s and he stated they have
63
Planning Commission Minutes – June 21, 2022
6
tried 3-4 times to build on that property and now they are going after it again because the Met
Council says they can. He does not think what the Met Council is doing is right and that they can
say what the City has the right do to. This is the City of Chanhassen and they should do what
they want to do. Mr. Littfin noted one thing Mr. Generous spoke of is false and when they did
the Laredo Drive project about 10 years ago, everyone that lived on Laredo Drive and the cul-de-
sacs forked over $6,000 for the project and that property there did not pay one red cent even
though they have a driveway coming out onto Laredo Drive. This is because they said their main
driveway was on Santa Vera. He said the wetlands that were redone going down to Kerber Pond
that the neighborhood paid for and that the Hansens will utilize for their project was not financed
at all by them. He noted there are deer living in the woods right now and maybe they need to get
the DNR involved and see what they say about the wildlife and green space in this town. Mr.
Littfin noted he cannot do anything on the property because of the ground cover and asked how
much ground cover will be left after the development. He noted the City is all ground cover and
there is no greenspace left in this town. Regarding the parking lot that was spoken of that is an
eyesore, they were reimbursed because the City of Chanhassen and the developer used that piece
of property to stage all their equipment when they did that whole road project. It is the way it is
because of that road project. Now they have two accesses onto Laredo Drive, curb-and-gutter,
and driveways going into their properties that they never paid anything for. He stated that was a
huge concern for the people that paid for this road project. Obviously, this is a town with money
and it is all about money, not about what the people want but rather about what they want as
builders. Mr. Littfin said they are willing to kick everyone out of their apartment complex to put
a third story on which is all about money. He asked the Commissioners when they pass this on to
the City Council, to think about what they want to do and what is good for this town. He said the
Fire Department is running 24/7 and he met with the Chief who said they have more calls than
ever. Mr. Littfin asked what is that traffic going to do on Laredo Drive, noting Santa Vera is the
only other road to get from Kerber to this side of town without going through a stop light. He
noted again that the Commissioners need to go on Santa Vera some night when there are sports;
it is down to one lane, and he cannot believe it has never been brought up in any safety aspects of
the town, especially the Fire Department. He thanked the Commissioners for listening and said
he would see them at the City Council meetings.
Dave Buckholz lives on a corner lot on Santa Vera and Chippewa Trail and most of his concerns
have been addressed. First, a three-story apartment building will look right into his son and
daughter’s window and basically their entire back yard will be visible from the third floor of the
building. Second, traffic is an issue and their kids are not allowed to play in the front yard
because many people do not stop at the stop sign. Finally, based on the drawings, he does not
think the current ownership could maintain it. The property has not been maintained over the last
couple of years; things such as graffiti on the rocks has been there since he moved in 10 years
ago.
Christina Ahola, 7496 Saratoga, is representing her parents, noting the family moved here in
1979. Earlier in the spring Ms. Ahola and her mother were walking through the park and noted it
is an eyesore and they need better housing for the community and were very excited to see the
property development. They fully support this being built and adding population to Chanhassen.
She noted there are issues to be addressed such as parking, street traffic on Santa Vera which is
absolutely terrible during sporting events, drain water issues, and the addition of 35 homes which
adds two cars each and whether people will be parking on Santa Vera and Laredo. Generally
64
Planning Commission Minutes – June 21, 2022
7
speaking, the family is very excited for the ugly forest to go away and to have more people in
Chanhassen.
Derek Mellot shared concerns and does not know if this will be low-income housing, or if there
will be resale of certain property. He calculated about 73 units including the existing 18
apartments in an area that looks like it is fit for maybe 4 houses and when factoring in the
increase in cars he thinks they are getting into really high density. His concern is with traffic,
number of bodies, and who is coming in to rent those apartments and whether they are dealing
with an enhanced chance of crime. He noted it would be really nice to have that area cleaned up
and updated. Mr. Mellot shares a bit of skepticism regarding the current level of upkeep as the
previous fall he was walking daily and there was a free stroller on the front lawn for over a week
and then it ended up on his road. He ended up taking the stroller to his garbage can to get rid of
it. If they will invest all of this time and money into making something beautiful he would hope
it would be kept up to prevent spillover of garbage into neighboring areas. Mr. Mellot is still
concerned, would like to know more, and would like the Commissioners to act as though they
live next door to this development.
Thomas Wilmer lives across the street and asked if the applicant has submitted any variances for
the project. He has a general list of eight that the applicant will have to deal with including the
height of three levels, distances to streets from the buildings, and building separation including
fire safety. He spoke about hardscape percentage of easily 60-70%, water runoff, and the large
amount of water flowing into the drain on the east side of the property. Mr. Wilmer noted
setback issues with the school, path, and parkway and said foul balls will hit the back of the
apartment complex. Regarding emergency vehicle access, is the through road wide enough for
two emergency vehicles to pass through? He asked about sewer and where all the water will go,
noting three drains that feed the area with one of them holding 70% of the drainage on the east
side. Mr. Wilmer asked whether they will see an architectural or scaled drawing with actual
dimensions of this before going to the next step. Other questions include if the underground
garage will be dug in with very heavy equipment or will it be under-unit parking creating a 40
foot height. He also shared concerns about the number of vehicles, street parking, and snow
removal. Mr. Wilmer asked if the units will be at the same setback as his home which is 35-odd
feet from the road. Regarding the existing apartment complex, the parking is barely sufficient
now and in adding another level where will those additional vehicles go? He spoke about the
trees and tree removal. Mr. Wilmer does not mind the applicant upgrading the apartment
complex and would prefer a couple of nice town homes, double bungalows, and some single-
family homes.
Keely Unrue, 7501 Chippewa Trail, is new to the neighborhood and has a five year old son about
to start Kindergarten at the elementary school. She stated Chanhassen seems like a safe and
walkable community. Her only comment is that this does not feel very safe and asks the
applicant to reevaluate and go back to the drawing board. She is excited to see what they can
come up with because she thinks they can do great things.
Gordy Nagel, 514 Del Rio Drive, complimented Doug Hansen who built his house and did a
marvelous job. When he saw the plans for the new development his heart went out because it
65
Planning Commission Minutes – June 21, 2022
8
does not fit the neighborhood; it is too compact, and he understands the applicant is trying to
recoup some of the value of the land. However, he vehemently opposes this plan and suggests
they go back and sharpen their pencils.
Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing.
Community Development Director Aanenson clarified the PUD process, noting every project
starts with a concept and the purpose here is to hear concerns which will all be brought to the
City Council and that the public hearing comments will be advanced. The purpose of the PUD is
for the applicant to get their ideas out there and she encouraged everyone to go to the website
and download the staff report as in that document they addressed all the things that need to be
done including a traffic study, accommodating additional stormwater runoff, and noted all of
those things are part of this plan. In order for the plan to be advanced it must meet all those
criteria. Both parties in good faith give a recommendation to where they see this going with the
intent to be fair to both parties. There are no final drawings with all the setbacks but looking at
the current PUD, there are setbacks and standards in there. This is the first attempt to air the
concept in the public and see where it goes. It will go to the City Council with minutes attached
for another presentation and the staff report. From there the developer will make a decision on
how they want to proceed.
Commissioner Alto asked if there are resources for citizens to address the current safety concerns
such as parking, stop signs, and traffic.
Ms. Aanenson replied in the affirmative, noting those are things that can be reported back to the
Sherriff’s Office, although it is best if it comes from the residents. She stated they do have a
Traffic Safety Committee, and that is what they do.
Commissioner Schwartz learned a long time ago that there is one chance to make a first
impression and his sense is that the developer is premature in coming with a concept plan
tonight. There are so many issues and concerns with aesthetics, density, and safety. He does not
know whether they did any field testing or received comments from neighbors impacted by the
development that could have been incorporated into the concept plan. He has great concerns
about the project and noted it does not fit with the neighborhood and he visited it several times
this week.
Commissioner Goff noted in the staff packet there are three pages and 34 recommendations of
things like a traffic study that needs to be done and almost everything they have heard tonight
needs to be ironed out. As staff noted, they will be seeing this again. With so many constraints
on the project, if the Commissioners said, yes, it is a very tight box the developer must work in.
Most of the concerns he sees such as addressing the Comprehensive Plan inconsistencies, tree
preservation, recommended use of a private street, traffic impact study, and so on, are addressed
and written into the staff recommendation which has to happen before it moves forward.
Commissioner Goff said this group will see it again and his biggest issue is the three-story
apartment building and line-of-sight for those around it.
Commissioner Noyes thinks it is a pretty simple discussion. In looking at the Comprehensive
Plan, it allows for a density of 61 units right now and the applicant has basically told the City this
66
Planning Commission Minutes – June 21, 2022
9
does not work financially unless they have 70 or more. The purpose of the discussion tonight is
to move that number and he can understand why all the details are not worked out because they
do not know if they have that density worked out. The rest of the process will all get fleshed out
in time if they get to that point. To Commissioner Noyes, it is about whether the City thinks
changing the density to allow for the 15% variance is a good thing. The Met Council has come
up and in order to get to that it must be deemed as affordable housing. It is a bit of a dichotomy
because they are trying to maximize the amount of revenue from the project to help pay for all
the huge infrastructure costs up front such as stormwater, wetlands, sewers, or updating the
apartments which is a huge investment. The question is whether the Commission thinks
approving this so the density can go to 70 is warranted.
Commissioner Johnson agrees with Commissioners Goff and Noyes and heard the area could use
a facelift; there are so many layers of rules and regulations that have to happen and what is being
presented is very conceptual. He noted that it’s likely not what will end up being built because
the developer must check all the City boxes through the approval process. He agrees with
increasing the density if that is what needs to happen to make it work financially.
Commissioner Soller said it seems clear that many people think the property should be
redeveloped and he tends to agree. He also believes the owners should be able to redevelop the
property within the confines of what is acceptable to the community and City. Ideally what
happens there should also fit the neighborhood. He noted it is already zoned high-density
although he thinks it is strange to be zoned that way as it is between parks, a school, and single-
family neighborhoods. Commissioner Soller stated the developer already has permissibility to
do so much of this project already. He is not sure this is the right project or the right concept, but
the process is there so everyone can understand the right way to redevelop this property.
Alto’s gut reaction in joining the Commission was to not like high-density. She has learned over
the last year that in the world they live in, it is the new rule of the game in development; it is
small lots, maximizing the dollar, and she thinks having a developer that lives in the
neighborhood and actually cares about the community is important. If they are not able to make
this work, she thinks they will sell the land and a developer that does not live in Chanhassen will
come in and do the exact same thing without listening to the neighborhood concerns the way this
developer is willing to. She does not think the single-family homes makes sense. In looking at
the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and what the City wants for the downtown in making it walkable
and bringing in additional residents, Commissioner Alto thinks this makes sense, it is what it is
zoned for, and it is what will happen eventually. Finding a way to make it work now with a local
developer is important and she thinks they should take the next step to try and make that work.
Commissioner Schwartz asked the Commissioners who want to move forward, does that mean
they are in agreement to increase the density.
Commissioner Soller’s vote to move forward does not mean he is in favor of increasing the
density, rather it is to learn more about what this would actually materialize to be. He noted the
City is in the driver’s seat, there are many constraints to moving forward, and he would vote yes
to more fact finding and learning more about how they can make it work.
67
Planning Commission Minutes – June 21, 2022
10
Chairman von Oven thanked the public for coming tonight and sharing. Something that stood out
for him is the comment asking the Commissioners to pretend that they live across the street and
he believes that is their job. He also believes it is their job to pretend they are the applicant to be
able to see both sides of the issue. If he saw the picture of the concept plan it would scare him
and he can see why neighbors are a bit terrified. However, if he puts himself in the shoes of the
developer, a recommendation by this body and the City Council that they are good with this
direction means to go ahead and start pouring money into it and then bring it back again to see if
they approve the list of conditions. Tonight it boils down to the fact that this is slated for
apartments and the Commission would be saying they are fine with townhouses and some single-
family homes. He does not want to send the developer the message to go ahead and start writing
checks against this concept and he struggles with the word “direction” in the proposed motion.
He is leaning toward the side of not having City Council approve the direction in hopes that
feedback from the neighborhood is taken for a new concept plan that will be smoother sailing
and give them more confidence in writing out those checks for the actual PUD in the future.
Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Soller seconded that the Chanhassen Planning
Commission recommends City Council approve the direction and issues for the concept
approval of PUD #2022-09, Hansen Homes 2022 Development Project as outlined in the
staff report. All voted in favor and the motion carried with a vote of 4 (Alto, Johnson,
Soller, Goff) to 3 (Chairman von Oven, Noyes, Schwartz).
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Commissioner Noyes noted the summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated
May 17, 2022 as presented.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE:
Ms. Aanenson updated the Commission, noting the City Council approved all of the Code
amendments, the final plat for Erhart Farm, and a drainage and utility easement. She stated they
do not have a meeting on July 5 but do have a meeting on July 19.
ADJOURNMENT:
Commissioner Schwartz moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion
carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was
adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Submitted by Kate Aanenson
Community Development Director
Prepared by Jean Steckling
Senior Admin. Support Specialist
68
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated June 14, 2022
File No.Item No: D.3
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council receives the Economic Development Commission minutes dated June
14, 2022."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
69
Economic Development Commission Minutes dated June 14, 2022
70
CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 14, 2022
Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Eric Anderson, Vice Chair David Kressler, Commissioners
Duke Zurek, Chris Freeman, and Stacy Goff.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Bob Generous, Senior Planner.
PUBLIC PRESENT: None.
WORK SESSION: None.
Chair Anderson asked if there were any items for the work session.
Mr. Generous responded that the agenda was formatted to include that section, but that no items
were to be reviewed.
Commissioner Goff noted that the Economic Development Manager position had closed for
applications.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
APPROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10,
2022.
Chair Anderson questioned whether a work session had been set up with City Council and the
Commission. He stated it was important that the Commission receive direction from City
Council on items that they were working on before they expended time and effort on projects
that would not go forward. He stated it could be done informally with City Council. Chair
Anderson said that he could contact someone by phone if that would help.
Mr. Generous explained that the Commission should prepare a specific item that they wanted to
pursue and then request that they get on the Council work session to discuss the items and
receive preliminary direction.
71
Economic Development Commission – May 10, 2022
2
Member Kressler moved, Member Zurek seconded to approve the Minutes of the
Economic Development Commission meeting dated May 10, 2022. All voted in favor and
the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 – 0.
DISCUSSION ITEMS: None.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION:
1. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Discussion
Mr. Generous presented a PowerPoint on land uses within the City. He noted that the City has
guided all property within the community for different land uses as shown on the 2040 Land Use
Plan Map, Figure 2-10. The individual land use acreages are broken out in Figure 2 – 8, 2020-
2040 Land Use Comparisons. As part of the Transportation Chapter of the Plan, Table 6.2, City
of Chanhassen 2040 Population, Households, and Employment by TAZ, attempts to project
development trends within the City by Traffic Analysis Zones, Figure 6.2, TAZ Map. Figure 2-4,
Net Developable Residential Acreage 2020-2040, analyses the potential residential development
from 2020- 204 based on the available residential parcels at the minimum density for each of the
residential land uses. Figure 2-5, Potential Development Timeline, projects development
timeframes for various areas of the City by near term and long-term development expectations.
Figure 2-1B, Highway 61 Corridor Revised Land Use Guiding, show the intensification of future
development along Flying Cloud Drive with areas of Mixed use consisting of high density
residential and commercial uses, High Density Residential uses, and Medium Density
Residential uses along the corridor. Figure 2-11, Chanhassen Commercial Land Use Categories
and Mixed Use Land Use, shows the various commercial land use areas of the City: Central
Business District, Neighborhood/Convenience Commercial, Community Commercial,
Regional/Lifestyle Center, and Mixed Use land use area.
Commissioner Freeman stated that it did not appear that there was a lot of land available for
development. Had City Council looked at this?
Generous stated that City Council had adopted the Comprehensive Plan, but that it had not been
discussed recently.
Chair Anderson stated that a developer could request an amendment to the land use as part of
their development proposal.
Commissioner Zurek said that it was a lot of information and thanked staff for the presentation.
72
Economic Development Commission – May 10, 2022
3
2. Business Communication
Mr. Generous stated that as a part of the previous agenda and discussion regarding
communication about the residential SeeClickFix portal of the City’s website that staff looked
into efforts being discussed by the City to communicate with businesses. One item was the
voluntary registration of businesses being discussed by the public safety department, which
would provide information about businesses and contact information for public safety purposes.
Part of the information is general information on the type of business. Staff felt that it potentially
could be included as part of economic development communication efforts by the City with the
business’ permission. This voluntary registration was a program in Savage, Minnesota.
CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION:None.
Mr. Generous noted that the interviews for the Economic Development Manager begin next
week.
Commissioner Freeman asked if there were any studies on good economic development
commissions that were done. He wanted to know what was available and how other
communities use their economic development commissions.
Commissioner Zurek said that the commissioners would be willing to assist in the economic
development manager interviewing process.
ADJOURNMENT:
Commissioner Zurek moved, Commissioner Goff seconded to adjourn the Economic
Development Commission meeting at 8:25 p.m. All voted in favor 5 – 0.
Submitted by Bob Generous
Senior Planner
Prepared by Amy Weidman
Administrative Support Specialist
73
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated June 8, 2022
File No.Item No: D.4
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Jean Steckling, Sr. Admin Support Specialist
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council receives the Environmental Commission minutes dated June 8,
2022."
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
74
Environmental Commission Minutes dated June 8, 2022
75
1
Chanhassen Environmental Commission (EC)
Chanhassen City Hall, Fountain Conference Room
6:00 pm
June 8, 2022
Members Present: Kristin Fulkerson, Leslie Elhadi, Scot Lacek, Julia Adams, Greg Hawks, Markus
Fischer, and Scott Grefe
Members Absent: Kaisa Buckholz
Staff Present: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist; Braden Orr, Environmental Intern
Visitors: none
Minutes: May minutes were approved.
Fall/Winter Connection Article: The commission discussed what topic should be covered in the
newsletter article. Markus offered to write it. The commission looked at the communications calendar
to decide on a topic. Since people will be thinking about fall chores perhaps the importance of leaf clean
up and why phosphorous is an issue would be good ideas. The commission would encourage residents
to also clean leaves from storm sewers.
July 3rd Trade Fair table planning: Commissioners volunteered for shifts at the Trade Fair which runs
4-6p on Sunday, July 3. Volunteers 4-5p: Kaisa, Julia, Greg. Volunteers 5-6p: Scot, Scott, Greg.
Greg is working with Eleanor at the watershed district to create a poster about aquifers showing where
our water comes from. He hopes to have it for the trade fair. Jill said she can supply an easel for the
poster. Greg also received a rain barrel from the district to use as a giveaway. And he got handouts –
‘guide to water conservation’. He’ll get copies to give away at expo. Leslie made 2 games! One uses
the information about average water use in a household as well as available freshwater in the world.
They could both be set up to show the amounts rather than having people pour the amounts – too messy
and potentially wasteful. A game board could be made where people place the different amounts on the
right description, i.e. amount of freshwater frozen in ice. The second game is a maze with Q&A about
water. Right answers add up to a win. The commission discussed how to create the game. Maybe have
it on a metal board and use magnets for the pieces. Nothing will blow away then.
Commissioners are reminded to wear their EC t-shirts at the expo. Greg will pick up supplies from Jill
the week before the 4th. Scott is also available to pick up materials. Jill will work with the
communications dept. to make the game boards.
Plastic Free July: Commission would like to promote it. They also agreed that they’d like to do a one-
day challenge to be plastic free. Maybe choose a date after the 4th. The commission viewed the Plastic
Free July website and found they have posters that can be used for free. Maybe the city could share 1
76
2
poster a week? They suggested putting those on social media. They also would like to add a link on the
commission webpage to the Plastic Free July website.
GreenStep Cities update: Jill reviewed what the GreenStep Cities program is with the commission.
She presented the assessment sheet that was compiled in 2020 showing the next steps necessary to reach
a Step 3. Many of them involve the adoption of policies. Reaching the next step will involve work to
engage staff to adopt the policies but won’t require any budget expenditures. The commission asked
how they could help. Jill asked them to research how other communities use resident committees to
advance GreenStep initiatives in those communities. Markus offered to look into it and report back.
City Updates: Jill gave updates on the WaterWise rebate program, the tree rebates, and the spread of
emerald ash borer in the community.
General Discussion: Greg gave an update on RPBCWD. Terry has been confirmed as the director.
The open board seat has been filled. They had an in-person meeting to accomplish this business but will
be returning to zoom meetings. Julia shared that the high school club made $1000 on their compost and
raspberry plant sales. Kristin said she will continue to try to reach the brewery to confirm the fall event
date.
Meeting adjourned at 7:45p
Minutes prepared by Jill Sinclair
77
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Approve Claims Paid dated August 8, 2022
File No.Item No: D.5
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director
Reviewed By Kelly Grinnell
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated August 8, 2022."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Financial Sustainability
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
The following claims are submitted for review and approval on August 8, 2022:
Check Numbers Amounts
177766 - 177998 $1,827,561.23
ACH Payments $703,730.46
Total All Claims $2,531,291.69
78
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Check Summary
Check Summary ACH
Check Detail
Check Detail ACH
79
Accounts Payable
User:
Printed:
dwashburn
8/2/2022 12:02 PM
Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount
MatJon Jonathan Matthias & Elizabeth Sand 07/07/2022 0.00 1,000.00177766
HerKimb Kimberly Hermann & Ryan Dewelle 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177767
4pawsAn 4 Paws Animal Control 07/07/2022 0.00 350.00177768
ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 07/07/2022 0.00 490.84177769
AMELEG AMERICAN LEGION-CHAN POST 580 07/07/2022 0.00 500.00177770
AMETIR AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 07/07/2022 0.00 1,018.12177771
APAGRO APACHE GROUP 07/07/2022 0.00 455.65177772
ArbHau Arbor Haus LLC 07/07/2022 0.00 500.00177773
BranJack Jack Brancel 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177774
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 07/07/2022 0.00 903.26177775
EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 07/07/2022 0.00 1,836.76177776
CleSol Cleaning Solutions Services 07/07/2022 0.00 7,620.00177777
CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 07/07/2022 0.00 2,404.20177778
COTHOM Cotswold Homes LLC 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177779
CoxOks Oksana & Thomas Cox 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177780
CUSPOO CUSTOM POOLS 07/07/2022 0.00 500.00177781
DANIANNI ANNIE & MATT DANIELSON 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177782
DayGaz Daystar Gazebos Inc 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177783
DeckUnli Decks Unlimited of Cokato 07/07/2022 0.00 500.00177784
DesBui Design Build by Landmark Inc 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177785
DLTSOL DLT SOLUTIONS INC 07/07/2022 0.00 2,465.12177786
EdiHea Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 07/07/2022 0.00 1,725.00177787
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 07/07/2022 0.00 442.90177788
ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 07/07/2022 0.00 29,838.34177789
FieLand Fiedler Landscaping Inc 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177790
ForCon Forterra Concrete Products, Inc 07/07/2022 0.00 4,500.25177791
FRAINC FRANEK INCORPORATED 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177792
FRENOR FRED NORDAHL CONSTRUCTION INC 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177793
GRABAR GRAYBAR 07/07/2022 0.00 867.12177794
HagGer Gerald & Sherry Haga 07/07/2022 0.00 500.00177795
HamAmy Amy Hamilton 07/07/2022 0.00 409.95177796
HANHOM HANSEN HOMETECH 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177797
HeaPar HealthPartners, Inc.07/07/2022 0.00 77,956.15177798
IndSig Indigo Signs 07/07/2022 0.00 360.00177799
IntRemo Integrity Remodeling & Design Group 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177800
J&MDis J&M Displays, Inc 07/07/2022 0.00 23,000.00177801
JetCle Jetter Clean, Inc 07/07/2022 0.00 577.00177802
JimExc Jim's Excavating 07/07/2022 0.00 4.20177803
LinScot Scott Lindblad 07/07/2022 0.00 500.00177804
LinScoMa Scott and Marsha Lindblad 07/07/2022 0.00 500.00177805
MDSRem Mds Remodeling 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177806
MetHol Metronet Holdings, LLC 07/07/2022 0.00 55.31177807
MilAla Alan Mills 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177808
OUTSOL OUTDOOR SOLUTIONS INC 07/07/2022 0.00 500.00177809
ParCons Partac Construction Group Chartered 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177810
PetDenn Dennis Peterson 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177811
PILDRY PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 07/07/2022 0.00 443.80177812
Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (8/2/2022 12:02 PM)
80
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount
PinPes Pinnacle Pest Control 07/07/2022 0.00 1,125.00177813
PreDec Precision Decks LLC 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177814
RegUofM Regents of the University of MN 07/07/2022 0.00 65.00177815
RetkThom Thomas Retka 07/07/2022 0.00 600.00177816
SajMas Masood Sajady 07/07/2022 0.00 750.00177817
Scherb Scherber Co LLC 07/07/2022 0.00 2,500.00177818
schcom Schwickert Company 07/07/2022 0.00 30,695.00177819
Scrap Scrapbusters 07/07/2022 0.00 500.00177820
TanDou Douglas Tanner 07/07/2022 0.00 2,500.00177821
TimSav TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 07/07/2022 0.00 381.00177822
TWOTEA TWO TEACHER CONSTRUCTION 07/07/2022 0.00 250.00177823
VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 07/07/2022 0.00 5,401.65177824
ZilClo Zillow Closing Services 07/07/2022 0.00 5.23177825
UnProDev United Properties Development, LLC & Affiliated Entities Per Schedule A07/14/2022 0.00 500.00177826
APAGRO APACHE GROUP 07/14/2022 0.00 1,785.96177827
Apres Apres, Inc.07/14/2022 0.00 12,738.34177828
BCATRA BCA 07/14/2022 0.00 15.00177829
BRYROC BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 07/14/2022 0.00 848.78177830
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 07/14/2022 0.00 318.10177831
CenLin CenturyLink 07/14/2022 0.00 64.00177832
Cintas Cintas Corporation No. 2 07/14/2022 0.00 37.97177833
COMASP Commercial Asphalt Co 07/14/2022 0.00 1,371.23177834
CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 07/14/2022 0.00 1,661.79177835
CROCOL CROWN COLLEGE 07/14/2022 0.00 200.00177836
CUBFOO CUB FOODS 07/14/2022 0.00 48.03177837
DEMCON DEM-CON LANDFILL 07/14/2022 0.00 54.99177838
Enterpr Enterprise FM Trust 07/14/2022 0.00 2,733.12177839
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 07/14/2022 0.00 667.58177840
ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 07/14/2022 0.00 60.52177841
GruThom Thomas Grund 07/14/2022 0.00 16.95177842
GYMWOR GYM WORKS INC 07/14/2022 0.00 400.00177843
HeaPar HealthPartners, Inc.07/14/2022 0.00 84,509.64177844
INDSCH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 07/14/2022 0.00 2,783.20177845
IndSig Indigo Signs 07/14/2022 0.00 3,051.83177846
Loc49 IUOE Local #49 07/14/2022 0.00 665.00177847
KocWill William Koch 07/14/2022 0.00 100.00177848
LawPro Lawson Products, Inc.07/14/2022 0.00 38.20177849
LEMKTRKE TRAVIS LEMKE 07/14/2022 0.00 50.00177850
LilJam James Lilla 07/14/2022 0.00 50.00177851
METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 07/14/2022 0.00 217,038.58177852
MINROA Minnesota Roadways Co 07/14/2022 0.00 249.28177853
MNSaf Minnesota Safety Council 07/14/2022 0.00 644.00177854
NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 07/14/2022 0.00 112.00177855
NORREC NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 07/14/2022 0.00 4,750.00177856
PeteSte Steve Peters 07/14/2022 0.00 85.00177857
PierRond Ronda & Dan Pierre 07/14/2022 0.00 100.00177858
ResEnv Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 07/14/2022 0.00 1,241.00177859
RodVal Val Roder 07/14/2022 0.00 200.00177860
SanSha Shawn Sanders 07/14/2022 0.00 150.00177861
SchSte Stephen Joseph Schmidt 07/14/2022 0.00 550.00177862
SITLAN SiteOne Landscape Supply 07/14/2022 0.00 233.09177863
TheHart The Hartford 07/14/2022 0.00 1,567.95177864
TRUWES TruWest LLC 07/14/2022 0.00 2,500.00177865
WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 07/14/2022 0.00 1,654.52177866
WATCOM WATEROUS COMPANY 07/14/2022 0.00 967.00177867
WicJoh John Wickenhauser 07/14/2022 0.00 21.46177868
AbsMec Absolute Mechanical 07/21/2022 0.00 2,779.56177869
Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (8/2/2022 12:02 PM)
81
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount
UB*02548 ALL AMERICAN TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 21.69177870
AndRoy Roy Anderson 07/21/2022 0.00 1,026.32177871
ARAMAR ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 1,862.55177872
UB*02555 Samir & Nijaza Basaric 07/21/2022 0.00 224.76177873
BroFir Brothers Fire Protection 07/21/2022 0.00 60.06177874
UB*02529 LOEL BROWN 07/21/2022 0.00 55.31177875
BroMich Michelle Brown 07/21/2022 0.00 100.00177876
BS&ASo BS & A Software 07/21/2022 0.00 2,356.00177877
UB*02525 BURNET TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 13.47177878
UB*02541 BURNET TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 118.31177879
UB*02544 BURNET TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 15.81177880
UB*02547 BURNET TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 27.97177881
UB*02549 BURNET TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 12.74177882
UB*02552 BURNET TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 58.43177883
UB*02545 Kanwarpreet Singh Dua & Carol Mary Greene Dua07/21/2022 0.00 149.67177884
UB*02540 Carver County Abstract & Title Co 07/21/2022 0.00 137.62177885
UB*02530 CCA&T 07/21/2022 0.00 40.56177886
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 07/21/2022 0.00 392.50177887
CenLin CenturyLink 07/21/2022 0.00 60.41177888
UB*02553 CHB TITLE LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 7.59177889
CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA 07/21/2022 0.00 1,999.28177890
CLEIRR CLEARWATER IRRIGATION INC 07/21/2022 0.00 549.77177891
CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 07/21/2022 0.00 29.66177892
CoxOks Oksana & Thomas Cox 07/21/2022 0.00 250.00177893
UB*02542 GLORIA J COX TRUST 07/21/2022 0.00 91.34177894
DAKSUP DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 07/21/2022 0.00 1,192.74177895
UB*02522 DCA TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 100.31177896
DRIBUI DRIFTWOOD BUILDERS INC 07/21/2022 0.00 250.00177897
EARAND Earl F Andersen Inc 07/21/2022 0.00 105.80177898
UB*02527 EDINA REALTY TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 76.27177899
UB*02538 EDINA REALTY TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 54.81177900
UB*02558 EDINA REALTY TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 153.72177901
EGACOM EGAN COMPANY 07/21/2022 0.00 2,598.00177902
ENVEQU Environmental Equipment & Services Inc 07/21/2022 0.00 82.13177903
UB*02556 NICOLE EVENSON-MOHR 07/21/2022 0.00 55.89177904
ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 07/21/2022 0.00 87,207.12177905
UB*02557 Roderick & Robin Franks 07/21/2022 0.00 38.06177906
GatSha Sharon & David Gatto 07/21/2022 0.00 5,718.57177907
GOGYMN Go Gymnastics 07/21/2022 0.00 2,362.50177908
gonhom GONYEA HOMES 07/21/2022 0.00 750.00177909
GRELAK GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC07/21/2022 0.00 911.79177910
GreenMat Matthew Green 07/21/2022 0.00 50.00177911
GREMEA GREEN MEADOWS INC 07/21/2022 0.00 431.83177912
HenMich Michael Henry 07/21/2022 0.00 100.00177913
HopSpo Hopkins Sports Camps LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 376.00177914
HOPWES HOPKINS WESTWIND CONCERT BAND 07/21/2022 VOID 300.00 0.00177915
IndSig Indigo Signs 07/21/2022 0.00 3,599.03177916
UB*02536 JEFFREY & JANNA JARVIS 07/21/2022 0.00 163.72177917
KERRMATT Matt Kerr 07/21/2022 0.00 48.46177918
AlbJen Jennifer Kottke-Alberts 07/21/2022 0.00 425.60177919
KraBru Bruce Kraft 07/21/2022 0.00 50.00177920
UB*02521 LAKE TITLE LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 215.73177921
UB*02534 LAKE TITLE LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 268.19177922
MINRUR MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 07/21/2022 0.00 300.00177923
MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 07/21/2022 0.00 496.22177924
EDMYS ED MYSLIVECEK 07/21/2022 0.00 1,000.00177925
NOVSOL NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 10,362.99177926
Page 3AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (8/2/2022 12:02 PM)
82
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount
UB*02554 OB MULLIGAN, LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 52.93177927
OerArc Oertel Architects 07/21/2022 0.00 7,417.00177928
UB*02526 Sandra Opheim 07/21/2022 0.00 13.27177929
PeaHea Peak Heating and Cooling 07/21/2022 0.00 168.43177930
PioRes Pioneer Research Corporation 07/21/2022 0.00 325.33177931
PremLL Premier Lawn & Landscape LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 990.00177932
PulEle Pulse Electric 07/21/2022 0.00 703.00177933
UB*02531 KAMINI RAMARAJ 07/21/2022 0.00 199.66177934
UB*02550 REALTECH TITLE LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 20.33177935
UB*02551 RED CEDAR POINT LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 49.83177936
REISSUE SUE REISS 07/21/2022 0.00 100.00177937
UB*02518 RESULTS TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 74.99177938
UB*02524 RESULTS TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 35.78177939
UB*02532 RESULTS TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 9.54177940
UB*02537 RESULTS TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 237.31177941
RMBENV RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 07/21/2022 0.00 226.52177942
schcom Schwickert Company 07/21/2022 0.00 3,860.00177943
UB*02535 JOHNNA & DAVID SMITH 07/21/2022 0.00 311.84177944
SOULOC SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 07/21/2022 0.00 1,087.00177945
SOUSUB Southwest Suburban Publishing 07/21/2022 0.00 5,144.82177946
StraKend Kendall Strand 07/21/2022 0.00 50.00177947
StuJac Jacob & Cari Sturgis 07/21/2022 0.00 250.00177948
StutMar Mary Stutelberg 07/21/2022 0.00 182.04177949
UB*02533 THE TITLE GROUP 07/21/2022 0.00 140.79177950
VANGRO The Vanella Group of MN LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 9,997.56177951
TimSav TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 07/21/2022 0.00 308.00177952
TitaEne Titan Energy Systems 07/21/2022 0.00 33,526.40177953
UB*02539 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 07/21/2022 0.00 47.84177954
Truwest Truwest, LLC 07/21/2022 0.00 2,500.00177955
VALRIC VALLEY-RICH CO INC 07/21/2022 0.00 427.27177956
UB*02523 WATERMARK TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 11.22177957
UB*02528 WATERMARK TITLE 07/21/2022 0.00 174.82177958
UB*02519 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 07/21/2022 0.00 65.07177959
UB*02520 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 07/21/2022 0.00 139.53177960
UB*02543 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 07/21/2022 0.00 73.53177961
UB*02546 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 07/21/2022 0.00 136.14177962
WilJenn Jennifer Wilson 07/21/2022 0.00 50.00177963
YamGol Yamaha Golf & Utility 07/21/2022 0.00 425.00177964
AMETES AMERICAN TEST CENTER 07/28/2022 0.00 272.00177965
AMETIR AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 07/28/2022 0.00 104.19177966
ARAMAR ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 07/28/2022 0.00 793.65177967
BendEva Eva Bender 07/28/2022 0.00 50.00177968
CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 07/28/2022 0.00 1,540.98177969
DELTOO DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 07/28/2022 0.00 184.18177970
ehlers EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 07/28/2022 0.00 4,450.00177971
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 07/28/2022 0.00 139.88177972
ANAFATT Ana Fatturi 07/28/2022 0.00 30.00177973
FerEnt Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 07/28/2022 0.00 295.63177974
ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 07/28/2022 0.00 4,571.34177975
GRABAR GRAYBAR 07/28/2022 0.00 11,873.61177976
HENCOU HENNEPIN COUNTY 07/28/2022 0.00 25.00177977
HOLTOU Holt Tour and Charter Inc 07/28/2022 0.00 650.00177978
LacSal Lacount Sales, LLC 07/28/2022 0.00 63.00177979
LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 07/28/2022 0.00 110.00177980
MIDCOU MID COUNTY COOP 07/28/2022 0.00 12,717.79177981
MNSec Minnesota Secretary of State - Notary 07/28/2022 0.00 120.00177982
MinuPre Minuteman Press 07/28/2022 0.00 23.00177983
Page 4AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (8/2/2022 12:02 PM)
83
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount
MJPRO MJ PRODUCTIONS 07/28/2022 0.00 500.00177984
mtidis MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 07/28/2022 0.00 286.30177985
NORREC NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 07/28/2022 0.00 880.00177986
POST POSTMASTER 07/28/2022 0.00 1,291.86177987
RAITRE RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 07/28/2022 0.00 349.60177988
RicAla Richard Alan Productions 07/28/2022 0.00 400.00177989
SagCur Curtis Sagstetter 07/28/2022 0.00 129.99177990
schcom Schwickert Company 07/28/2022 0.00 6,922.00177991
SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 07/28/2022 0.00 136.50177992
SMHEN SM HENTGES & SONS 07/28/2022 0.00 1,010,729.53177993
TRACON TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 07/28/2022 0.00 1,200.00177994
UnmMatt Matt Unmacht 07/28/2022 0.00 53.00177995
WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 07/28/2022 0.00 2,187.29177996
WesSwi Westwind Swing Band, LLC 07/28/2022 0.00 300.00177997
WilNur WILSON'S NURSERY INC 07/28/2022 0.00 4,080.30177998
Report Total (233 checks): 1,827,561.23 300.00
Page 5AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (8/2/2022 12:02 PM)
84
Accounts Payable
Checks by Date - Summary by Check
User: dwashburn
Printed: 8/2/2022 12:02 PM
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 07/07/2022
0.00 39.78
ACH carcou Carver County 07/07/2022
0.00 96,309.77
ACH CRYINF Crystal Infosystems LLC 07/07/2022
0.00 157.00
ACH engwat Engel Water Testing Inc 07/07/2022
0.00 625.00
ACH GILMEC GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 07/07/2022
0.00 50.00
ACH HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 07/07/2022
0.00 4,083.25
ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 07/07/2022
0.00 28,036.60
ACH HOIKOE HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 07/07/2022
0.00 1,009.73
ACH ICC INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 07/07/2022
0.00 24.00
ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 07/07/2022
0.00 17,064.00
ACH KRESER KREMER SERVICES 07/07/2022
0.00 1,668.16
ACH LifSup Life Support Innovations LLC 07/07/2022
0.00 4,626.20
ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 07/07/2022
0.00 289.24
ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 07/07/2022
0.00 25.16
ACH OREAUT O'Reilly Automotive Inc 07/07/2022
0.00 56.14
ACH PRALAW PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 07/07/2022
0.00 46.02
ACH HLBTAU REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 07/07/2022
0.00 34,578.60
ACH DaniReem Reem Danial 07/07/2022
0.00 163.80
ACH UniAth Universal Athletic Services, Inc. 07/07/2022
0.00 1,589.22
ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 07/07/2022
0.00 1,277.68
ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 07/07/2022
0.00 1,055.15
ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 07/07/2022
0.00 16,528.97
ACH BENEXT BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 07/14/2022
0.00 228.60
ACH BROAWA BROADWAY AWARDS 07/14/2022
0.00 95.89
ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 07/14/2022
0.00 354.07
ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 07/14/2022
0.00 5,684.51
ACH HOIKOE HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 07/14/2022
0.00 2,100.00
ACH INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc 07/14/2022
0.00 187.00
ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergency Group 07/14/2022
0.00 1,449.80
ACH Marco Marco Inc 07/14/2022
0.00 1,010.00
ACH MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 07/14/2022
0.00 1,509.30
ACH MINGER MINGER CONSTRUCTION 07/14/2022
0.00 2,790.00
ACH MINNOCC MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 07/14/2022
0.00 361.00
ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 07/14/2022
0.00 5,970.13
ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 07/14/2022
0.00 320.16
ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 07/14/2022
0.00 9,418.17
ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 07/14/2022
0.00 4.00
ACH QUAFLO Quality Flow Systems Inc 07/14/2022
0.00 16,140.00
ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 07/14/2022
0.00 120.67
ACH SunLif Sun Life Financial 07/14/2022
0.00 1,922.95
ACH UniAth Universal Athletic Services, Inc. 07/14/2022
0.00 3,149.11
ACH WarLit Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 07/14/2022
0.00 2,794.00
ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 07/14/2022
0.00 419.47
ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 07/14/2022
0.00 552.42
ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 07/14/2022
0.00 4,381.50
ACH AdvEng Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 07/21/2022
0.00 2,635.00
Page 1 of 3 85
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
ACH BOLMEN BOLTON & MENK INC 07/21/2022
0.00 39,312.96
ACH BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 07/21/2022
0.00 3,153.55
ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 07/21/2022
0.00 16,384.56
ACH carcou Carver County 07/21/2022
0.00 3,625.50
ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 07/21/2022
0.00 7,657.94
ACH ColFun Colliers Funding, LLC 07/21/2022
0.00 132,659.62
ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 07/21/2022
0.00 492.80
ACH DelDen Delta Dental 07/21/2022
0.00 4,253.85
ACH EMEAUT EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 07/21/2022
0.00 1,277.48
ACH ESSBRO ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 07/21/2022
0.00 550.80
ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 07/21/2022
0.00 290.94
ACH Avesis Fidelity Security Life 07/21/2022
0.00 323.40
ACH HALCOM HALLOCK COMPANY 07/21/2022
0.00 222.78
ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 07/21/2022
0.00 20,794.04
ACH HOIKOE HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 07/21/2022
0.00 1,354.42
ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 07/21/2022
0.00 415.48
ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 07/21/2022
0.00 75.00
ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergency Group 07/21/2022
0.00 888.20
ACH Marco Marco Inc 07/21/2022
0.00 735.00
ACH METCO Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 07/21/2022
0.00 7,380.45
ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 07/21/2022
0.00 4,205.16
ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 07/21/2022
0.00 92.94
ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 07/21/2022
0.00 174.29
ACH PRARES PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 07/21/2022
0.00 1,340.00
ACH DaniReem Reem Danial 07/21/2022
0.00 33.60
ACH IMPPOR Rent N Save Portable Services 07/21/2022
0.00 5,518.00
ACH SCTC SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR TRANS COAL 07/21/2022
0.00 3,500.00
ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 07/21/2022
0.00 56.76
ACH TarLea TargetSolutions Learning, LLC 07/21/2022
0.00 4,720.37
ACH TWIWES TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RR CO 07/21/2022
0.00 1,045.01
ACH UniAth Universal Athletic Services, Inc. 07/21/2022
0.00 330.00
ACH WatCon Water Conservation Services, Inc. 07/21/2022
0.00 1,385.63
ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 07/21/2022
0.00 416.76
ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 07/21/2022
0.00 40.00
ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 07/21/2022
0.00 39,799.76
ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 07/21/2022
0.00 5,745.38
ACH ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 07/21/2022
0.00 1,050.40
ACH AdvEng Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 07/28/2022
0.00 3,088.37
ACH BarEng Barr Engineering Company 07/28/2022
0.00 13,934.00
ACH CarCou Carver County 07/28/2022
0.00 29,625.26
ACH CleGov ClearGov Inc 07/28/2022
0.00 6,221.66
ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 07/28/2022
0.00 67.80
ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 07/28/2022
0.00 3,000.00
ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 07/28/2022
0.00 421.80
ACH HeaStr Health Strategies 07/28/2022
0.00 34.00
ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 07/28/2022
0.00 779.71
ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 07/28/2022
0.00 127.97
ACH KenGra KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 07/28/2022
0.00 107.50
ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 07/28/2022
0.00 32,867.85
ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergency Group 07/28/2022
0.00 1,450.00
ACH MidAqu Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 07/28/2022
0.00 550.00
ACH MinEqu Minnesota Equipment 07/28/2022
0.00 374.84
ACH MOSBAR MOSS & BARNETT 07/28/2022
0.00 1,158.50
ACH PRARES PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 07/28/2022
0.00 450.00
ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 07/28/2022
0.00 589.38
ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 07/28/2022
0.00 24,502.17
Page 2 of 3 86
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
ACH ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 07/28/2022
0.00 175.60
Report Total:0.00 703,730.46
Page 3 of 3 87
AP
Check Detail-Checks
User: dwashburn
Printed: 8/2/2022 12:17:34 PM
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
& Affiliated Entities Per Schedule A United Properties Development, LLC 101-0000-2076 500.00 7/14/2022 Security Escrow - Landscape - Powers Pointe
500.00 7/14/2022
& Affiliated Entities Per Schedule A United Properties Development, LLC 500.00
& Elizabeth Sand Jonathan Matthias 101-0000-2073 1,000.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-00649 - 6697 Pointe Lake Lucy
1,000.00 7/7/2022
& Elizabeth Sand Jonathan Matthias 1,000.00
& Ryan Dewelle Kimberly Hermann 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-05903 - 2820 Tanagers Lane
250.00 7/7/2022
& Ryan Dewelle Kimberly Hermann 250.00
4 Paws Animal Control 101-1260-4300 175.00 7/7/2022 Animal control services-May
4 Paws Animal Control 101-1260-4300 175.00 7/7/2022 Animal control services-June
350.00 7/7/2022
4 Paws Animal Control 350.00
Absolute Mechanical 101-1250-3302 2,779.56 7/21/2022 Overpayment - Permit P2022-02191 - 8170 Upland Circle
2,779.56 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 1 of 43
88
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Absolute Mechanical 2,779.56
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.93 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099059-000, 6471 PIPEWOOD CURVE
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 3.98 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099059-000, 6471 PIPEWOOD CURVE
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 701-0000-2020 9.90 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099059-000, 6471 PIPEWOOD CURVE
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 720-0000-2020 6.88 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099059-000, 6471 PIPEWOOD CURVE
21.69 7/21/2022
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 21.69
ALLSTREAM 760-1160-4311 490.84 7/7/2022 Mitel phone system
490.84 7/7/2022
ALLSTREAM 490.84
AMERICAN LEGION-CHAN POST 580 101-0000-2073 500.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-00548 - 290 Lake Drive
500.00 7/7/2022
AMERICAN LEGION-CHAN POST 580 500.00
AMERICAN TEST CENTER 101-1220-4530 272.00 7/28/2022 test/inspection report-Ground ladder & heat sensors
272.00 7/28/2022
AMERICAN TEST CENTER 272.00
AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 101-1550-4120 1,018.12 7/7/2022 Tires
1,018.12 7/7/2022
AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 101-1550-4120 104.19 7/28/2022 ST235/80R16/10 124/120L Her Power St2 St Trailer
104.19 7/28/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 2 of 43
89
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 1,122.31
Anderson Roy 720-7025-4706 1,026.32 7/21/2022 Irrigation Repair Reimbursement
1,026.32 7/21/2022
Anderson Roy 1,026.32
APACHE GROUP 101-1170-4110 31.58 7/7/2022 Supplies
APACHE GROUP 101-1170-4530 424.07 7/7/2022 Supplies
455.65 7/7/2022
APACHE GROUP 101-1170-4350 1,785.96 7/14/2022 Supplies
1,785.96 7/14/2022
APACHE GROUP 2,241.61
Apres, Inc.101-1613-4410 12,738.34 7/14/2022 4th of July rental
12,738.34 7/14/2022
Apres, Inc. 12,738.34
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 92.17 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 92.17 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 358.71 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 187.49 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 41.86 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 41.86 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 60.50 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 670.55 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 -9.50 7/21/2022 Office Supplies - Return
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 187.49 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 71.39 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 67.86 7/21/2022 Office Supplies
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 3 of 43
90
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
1,862.55 7/21/2022
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 187.49 7/28/2022 Coffee
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 606.16 7/28/2022 Coffee/creamer
793.65 7/28/2022
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 2,656.20
Arbor Haus LLC 101-0000-2073 500.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-01275 - 6200 Murray Hill Road
500.00 7/7/2022
Arbor Haus LLC 500.00
Basaric Samir & Nijaza 720-0000-2020 15.69 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020041-000, 7277 PONTIAC CIRCLE
Basaric Samir & Nijaza 700-0000-2020 73.88 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020041-000, 7277 PONTIAC CIRCLE
Basaric Samir & Nijaza 700-0000-2020 4.06 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020041-000, 7277 PONTIAC CIRCLE
Basaric Samir & Nijaza 701-0000-2020 131.13 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020041-000, 7277 PONTIAC CIRCLE
224.76 7/21/2022
Basaric Samir & Nijaza 224.76
BCA 101-1120-4300 15.00 7/14/2022 Background Investigation
15.00 7/14/2022
BCA 15.00
Bender Eva 700-7204-4901 50.00 7/28/2022 Waterwise Rebate-smart irrigation controller
50.00 7/28/2022
Bender Eva 50.00
Brancel Jack 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion control - Permit 2017-01685 - 8727 Lake Riley Drive
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 4 of 43
91
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
250.00 7/7/2022
Brancel Jack 250.00
Brothers Fire Protection 101-0000-2022 0.03 7/21/2022 Refund - Permit P2022-01917 - 731 Wildflower Ln
Brothers Fire Protection 101-1250-3306 30.00 7/21/2022 Refund - Permit P2022-01921 - 725 Wildflower Ln
Brothers Fire Protection 101-0000-2022 0.03 7/21/2022 Refund - Permit P2022-01921 - 725 Wildflower Ln
Brothers Fire Protection 101-1250-3306 30.00 7/21/2022 Refund - Permit P2022-01917 - 731 Wildflower Ln
60.06 7/21/2022
Brothers Fire Protection 60.06
BROWN LOEL 700-0000-2020 19.25 7/21/2022 Refund Check 096220-015, 901 CARVER BEACH ROAD
BROWN LOEL 700-0000-2020 1.52 7/21/2022 Refund Check 096220-015, 901 CARVER BEACH ROAD
BROWN LOEL 701-0000-2020 23.27 7/21/2022 Refund Check 096220-015, 901 CARVER BEACH ROAD
BROWN LOEL 720-0000-2020 11.27 7/21/2022 Refund Check 096220-015, 901 CARVER BEACH ROAD
55.31 7/21/2022
BROWN LOEL 55.31
Brown Michelle 720-7202-4130 100.00 7/21/2022 Tree Rebate
100.00 7/21/2022
Brown Michelle 100.00
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 720-7207-4150 848.78 7/14/2022 Materials
848.78 7/14/2022
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 848.78
BS & A Software 101-1160-4326 2,356.00 7/21/2022 Online Permit Application Fees
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 5 of 43
92
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
2,356.00 7/21/2022
BS & A Software 2,356.00
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 7.46 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019709-004, 810 BUCKINGWOOD COURT
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.87 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019709-004, 810 BUCKINGWOOD COURT
BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 13.21 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019709-004, 810 BUCKINGWOOD COURT
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 6.43 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019709-004, 810 BUCKINGWOOD COURT
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 12.33 7/21/2022 Refund Check 011997-000, 7600 CANYON CURVE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 17.15 7/21/2022 Refund Check 011997-000, 7600 CANYON CURVE
BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 27.29 7/21/2022 Refund Check 011997-000, 7600 CANYON CURVE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.66 7/21/2022 Refund Check 011997-000, 7600 CANYON CURVE
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 6.94 7/21/2022 Refund Check 013029-000, 3401 SHORE DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.59 7/21/2022 Refund Check 013029-000, 3401 SHORE DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 5.21 7/21/2022 Refund Check 013029-000, 3401 SHORE DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 3.13 7/21/2022 Refund Check 018052-000, 6683 MULBERRY CIRCLE E
BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 5.55 7/21/2022 Refund Check 018052-000, 6683 MULBERRY CIRCLE E
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.57 7/21/2022 Refund Check 018052-000, 6683 MULBERRY CIRCLE E
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 4.22 7/21/2022 Refund Check 018052-000, 6683 MULBERRY CIRCLE E
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 33.92 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020265-000, 6363 OXBOW BEND
BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 49.77 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020265-000, 6363 OXBOW BEND
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 30.52 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020265-000, 6363 OXBOW BEND
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 4.10 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020265-000, 6363 OXBOW BEND
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 13.55 7/21/2022 Refund Check 097608-003, 1120 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 2.26 7/21/2022 Refund Check 097608-003, 1120 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE
246.73 7/21/2022
BURNET TITLE 246.73
Carol Mary Greene Dua Kanwarpreet Singh Dua &720-0000-2020 59.94 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019027-006, 2328 HUNTER DRIVE
Carol Mary Greene Dua Kanwarpreet Singh Dua &700-0000-2020 8.06 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019027-006, 2328 HUNTER DRIVE
Carol Mary Greene Dua Kanwarpreet Singh Dua &701-0000-2020 44.34 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019027-006, 2328 HUNTER DRIVE
Carol Mary Greene Dua Kanwarpreet Singh Dua &700-0000-2020 37.33 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019027-006, 2328 HUNTER DRIVE
149.67 7/21/2022
Carol Mary Greene Dua Kanwarpreet Singh Dua & 149.67
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 6 of 43
93
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Carver County Abstract & Title Co 720-0000-2020 27.29 7/21/2022 Refund Check 007648-000, 491 TRAP LINE LANE
Carver County Abstract & Title Co 701-0000-2020 54.20 7/21/2022 Refund Check 007648-000, 491 TRAP LINE LANE
Carver County Abstract & Title Co 700-0000-2020 52.46 7/21/2022 Refund Check 007648-000, 491 TRAP LINE LANE
Carver County Abstract & Title Co 700-0000-2020 3.67 7/21/2022 Refund Check 007648-000, 491 TRAP LINE LANE
137.62 7/21/2022
Carver County Abstract & Title Co 137.62
CCA&T 720-0000-2020 5.13 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099488-000, 850 PONTIAC LANE
CCA&T 700-0000-2020 6.64 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099488-000, 850 PONTIAC LANE
CCA&T 701-0000-2020 28.11 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099488-000, 850 PONTIAC LANE
CCA&T 700-0000-2020 0.68 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099488-000, 850 PONTIAC LANE
40.56 7/21/2022
CCA&T 40.56
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1190-4321 396.74 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1170-4321 144.89 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7043-4321 161.68 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7019-4321 144.29 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-0000-4321 21.80 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1550-4321 33.86 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
903.26 7/7/2022
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 701-0000-4321 24.63 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1600-4321 21.80 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 701-0000-4321 27.16 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-0000-4321 27.17 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1370-4321 217.34 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
318.10 7/14/2022
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1220-4321 226.14 7/21/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1530-4321 144.56 7/21/2022 Monthly Service
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1171-4321 21.80 7/21/2022 Monthly Service
392.50 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 7 of 43
94
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,613.86
CENTURYLINK 101-1220-4311 33.04 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 700-7019-4311 217.71 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4311 15.13 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4311 15.13 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 101-1350-4311 30.04 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 101-1190-4311 123.88 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 101-1550-4311 30.04 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 101-1160-4325 250.00 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 101-1170-4311 843.80 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 101-1160-4325 125.00 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4311 6.01 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 101-1370-4311 48.06 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 101-1540-4311 92.91 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4311 6.01 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
1,836.76 7/7/2022
CenturyLink 700-0000-4311 32.00 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
CenturyLink 701-0000-4311 32.00 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
64.00 7/14/2022
CenturyLink 700-7043-4311 60.41 7/21/2022 Monthly Service
60.41 7/21/2022
CenturyLink 1,961.17
CHB TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 3.04 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099544-000, 7665 NICHOLAS WAY
CHB TITLE LLC 720-0000-2020 0.94 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099544-000, 7665 NICHOLAS WAY
CHB TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 0.64 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099544-000, 7665 NICHOLAS WAY
CHB TITLE LLC 701-0000-2020 2.97 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099544-000, 7665 NICHOLAS WAY
7.59 7/21/2022
CHB TITLE LLC 7.59
Cintas Corporation No. 2 101-1550-4300 2.95 7/14/2022 1st Aid Cabinet
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 8 of 43
95
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Cintas Corporation No. 2 101-1550-4300 35.02 7/14/2022 Supplies - 1st Aid cabinet
37.97 7/14/2022
Cintas Corporation No. 2 37.97
CITY OF CHASKA 101-1130-4370 1,999.28 7/21/2022 Conference - Kelly Grinnell
1,999.28 7/21/2022
CITY OF CHASKA 1,999.28
Cleaning Solutions Services 101-1190-4511 3,780.00 7/7/2022 Cleaning Services
Cleaning Solutions Services 701-0000-4511 60.00 7/7/2022 Cleaning Services
Cleaning Solutions Services 101-1370-4511 480.00 7/7/2022 Cleaning Services
Cleaning Solutions Services 101-1290-4511 240.00 7/7/2022 Cleaning Services
Cleaning Solutions Services 101-1170-4511 3,000.00 7/7/2022 Cleaning Services
Cleaning Solutions Services 700-0000-4511 60.00 7/7/2022 Cleaning Services
7,620.00 7/7/2022
Cleaning Solutions Services 7,620.00
CLEARWATER IRRIGATION INC 720-7025-4706 549.77 7/21/2022 Service Call
549.77 7/21/2022
CLEARWATER IRRIGATION INC 549.77
Commercial Asphalt Co 700-0000-4550 1,371.23 7/14/2022 Materials
1,371.23 7/14/2022
Commercial Asphalt Co 1,371.23
CORE & MAIN LP 700-0000-4550 2,404.20 7/7/2022 Materials
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 9 of 43
96
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
2,404.20 7/7/2022
CORE & MAIN LP 700-0000-4550 1,661.79 7/14/2022 parts
1,661.79 7/14/2022
CORE & MAIN LP 720-7207-4150 29.66 7/21/2022 Materials
29.66 7/21/2022
CORE & MAIN LP 700-0000-4550 1,540.98 7/28/2022 valve parts
1,540.98 7/28/2022
CORE & MAIN LP 5,636.63
Cotswold Homes LLC 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-00367 - 6853 Nez Perce Drive
250.00 7/7/2022
Cotswold Homes LLC 250.00
Cox Oksana & Thomas 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02330 - 6360 Fox Path
250.00 7/7/2022
Cox Oksana & Thomas 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/21/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-03133 - 6360 Fox Path
250.00 7/21/2022
Cox Oksana & Thomas 500.00
COX TRUST GLORIA J 720-0000-2020 2.91 7/21/2022 Refund Check 010424-000, 6990 SHAWNEE LANE
COX TRUST GLORIA J 700-0000-2020 27.03 7/21/2022 Refund Check 010424-000, 6990 SHAWNEE LANE
COX TRUST GLORIA J 700-0000-2020 0.39 7/21/2022 Refund Check 010424-000, 6990 SHAWNEE LANE
COX TRUST GLORIA J 701-0000-2020 61.01 7/21/2022 Refund Check 010424-000, 6990 SHAWNEE LANE
91.34 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 10 of 43
97
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
COX TRUST GLORIA J 91.34
CROWN COLLEGE 101-1220-4370 200.00 7/14/2022 EMT Training
200.00 7/14/2022
CROWN COLLEGE 200.00
CUB FOODS 101-1220-4290 48.03 7/14/2022 Supplies
48.03 7/14/2022
CUB FOODS 48.03
CUSTOM POOLS 101-0000-2073 500.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-01261 - 1650 West Farm Road
500.00 7/7/2022
CUSTOM POOLS 500.00
DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 701-0000-4120 125.00 7/21/2022 Supplies
DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 700-0000-4120 125.00 7/21/2022 Supplies
DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 700-0000-4550 472.00 7/21/2022 Supplies
DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 700-0000-4550 470.74 7/21/2022 Supplies
1,192.74 7/21/2022
DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 1,192.74
DANIELSON ANNIE & MATT 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-00512 - 9130 Degler Circle
250.00 7/7/2022
DANIELSON ANNIE & MATT 250.00
Daystar Gazebos Inc 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-02123 - 7111 Derby Drive
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 11 of 43
98
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
250.00 7/7/2022
Daystar Gazebos Inc 250.00
DCA TITLE 700-0000-2020 34.81 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100285-000, 8612 CHAN HILLS DR SO
DCA TITLE 701-0000-2020 65.50 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100285-000, 8612 CHAN HILLS DR SO
100.31 7/21/2022
DCA TITLE 100.31
Decks Unlimited of Cokato 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-00834 - 9137 Springfield Dr
Decks Unlimited of Cokato 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-00601 - 8012 Dakota Ave
500.00 7/7/2022
Decks Unlimited of Cokato 500.00
DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 101-1370-4260 184.18 7/28/2022 10TN Ram 2.25 Stroke
184.18 7/28/2022
DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 184.18
DEM-CON LANDFILL 101-1320-4150 54.99 7/14/2022 Disposal
54.99 7/14/2022
DEM-CON LANDFILL 54.99
Design Build by Landmark Inc 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-01884 - 6341 Murray Hill Road
250.00 7/7/2022
Design Build by Landmark Inc 250.00
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 12 of 43
99
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
DLT SOLUTIONS INC 760-1160-4217 2,465.12 7/7/2022 AutoDesk Annual License Renewal
2,465.12 7/7/2022
DLT SOLUTIONS INC 2,465.12
DRIFTWOOD BUILDERS INC 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/21/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2022-00941 - 1471 Camden Ridge Drive
250.00 7/21/2022
DRIFTWOOD BUILDERS INC 250.00
Earl F Andersen Inc 101-1320-4560 105.80 7/21/2022 Safety Signs
105.80 7/21/2022
Earl F Andersen Inc 105.80
Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 701-0000-4120 1,725.00 7/7/2022 AC unit Repair
1,725.00 7/7/2022
Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 1,725.00
EDINA REALTY TITLE 720-0000-2020 5.81 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100889-000, 920 LAKE LUCY ROAD
EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.78 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100889-000, 920 LAKE LUCY ROAD
EDINA REALTY TITLE 701-0000-2020 37.24 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100889-000, 920 LAKE LUCY ROAD
EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 10.98 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100889-000, 920 LAKE LUCY ROAD
EDINA REALTY TITLE 701-0000-2020 71.88 7/21/2022 Refund Check 018375-000, 6207 CASCADE PASS
EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 4.56 7/21/2022 Refund Check 018375-000, 6207 CASCADE PASS
EDINA REALTY TITLE 720-0000-2020 33.94 7/21/2022 Refund Check 018375-000, 6207 CASCADE PASS
EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 43.34 7/21/2022 Refund Check 018375-000, 6207 CASCADE PASS
EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.18 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020442-000, 7571 BEACON COURT
EDINA REALTY TITLE 720-0000-2020 8.79 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020442-000, 7571 BEACON COURT
EDINA REALTY TITLE 701-0000-2020 44.89 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020442-000, 7571 BEACON COURT
EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 21.41 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020442-000, 7571 BEACON COURT
284.80 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 13 of 43
100
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
EDINA REALTY TITLE 284.80
EGAN COMPANY 101-1190-4510 2,598.00 7/21/2022 service call
2,598.00 7/21/2022
EGAN COMPANY 2,598.00
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 700-7029-4300 494.44 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 700-7040-4300 494.44 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 700-7054-4300 168.11 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 700-7049-4300 494.45 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 370-0000-4300 494.44 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 701-7032-4300 247.22 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 700-7032-4300 247.22 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 700-7046-4300 494.45 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 720-7054-4300 163.17 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 700-7044-4300 494.45 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 700-7030-4300 494.44 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 701-7054-4300 163.17 7/28/2022 Continuing Disclosure Fee
4,450.00 7/28/2022
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 4,450.00
Enterprise FM Trust 770-1376-4412 707.09 7/14/2022 Lease - 214L
Enterprise FM Trust 770-1376-4412 1,314.97 7/14/2022 Lease - 201L
Enterprise FM Trust 770-1376-4412 711.06 7/14/2022 Lease - 140L
2,733.12 7/14/2022
Enterprise FM Trust 2,733.12
Environmental Equipment & Services Inc 101-1320-4120 82.13 7/21/2022 Supplies
82.13 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 14 of 43
101
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Environmental Equipment & Services Inc 82.13
EVENSON-MOHR NICOLE 700-0000-2020 1.66 7/21/2022 Refund Check 005404-000, 8797 NORTH BAY DRIVE
EVENSON-MOHR NICOLE 720-0000-2020 5.53 7/21/2022 Refund Check 005404-000, 8797 NORTH BAY DRIVE
EVENSON-MOHR NICOLE 700-0000-2020 17.90 7/21/2022 Refund Check 005404-000, 8797 NORTH BAY DRIVE
EVENSON-MOHR NICOLE 701-0000-2020 30.80 7/21/2022 Refund Check 005404-000, 8797 NORTH BAY DRIVE
55.89 7/21/2022
EVENSON-MOHR NICOLE 55.89
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1550-4120 43.80 7/7/2022 Supplies
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 700-0000-4120 43.80 7/7/2022 Supplies
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 700-0000-4140 155.64 7/7/2022 Supplies
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1320-4120 43.80 7/7/2022 Supplies
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 700-0000-4120 155.86 7/7/2022 Supplies
442.90 7/7/2022
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1320-4120 155.86 7/14/2022 Supplies
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 701-0000-4120 511.72 7/14/2022 Supplies
667.58 7/14/2022
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 701-0000-4140 139.88 7/28/2022 FVP P65
139.88 7/28/2022
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 1,250.36
Fatturi Ana 101-1220-4381 30.00 7/28/2022 Parking-ImageTrend conference
30.00 7/28/2022
Fatturi Ana 30.00
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 101-1550-4151 295.63 7/28/2022 Diaph rep kit/Urn kit/Clst rep kit
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 15 of 43
102
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
295.63 7/28/2022
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 295.63
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-1384-4556 18,606.01 7/7/2022 Meters
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 116.78 7/7/2022 Curb Box Repair
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 437.16 7/7/2022 Parts & Tools
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 340.05 7/7/2022 Supplies
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 742.56 7/7/2022 Supplies
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 701-1384-4556 332.74 7/7/2022 Meters
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-1384-4556 332.75 7/7/2022 Meters
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-1384-4556 -5,400.00 7/7/2022 Meter Reading Credit
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 720-7207-4150 1,124.28 7/7/2022 Supplies
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 701-1384-4556 -5,400.00 7/7/2022 Meter Reading Credit
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 701-1384-4556 18,606.01 7/7/2022 Meters
29,838.34 7/7/2022
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 43.18 7/14/2022 Parts
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 17.34 7/14/2022 Parts
60.52 7/14/2022
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 296.12 7/21/2022 Materials
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-1384-4556 2,707.86 7/21/2022 Supplies
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-1384-4556 40,455.00 7/21/2022 Meters
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 701-1384-4556 40,455.00 7/21/2022 Meters
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 585.28 7/21/2022 Materials
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 701-1384-4556 2,707.86 7/21/2022 Supplies
87,207.12 7/21/2022
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 3,746.28 7/28/2022 12/8/6 Splt Megalug F/DI
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 825.06 7/28/2022 6 DI 2blt macro coup-Frontier main break repair
4,571.34 7/28/2022
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 121,677.32
Fiedler Landscaping Inc 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-01392 - 1741 Wood Duck Lane
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 16 of 43
103
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
250.00 7/7/2022
Fiedler Landscaping Inc 250.00
Forterra Concrete Products, Inc 720-7207-4150 3,440.25 7/7/2022 Materials
Forterra Concrete Products, Inc 720-7207-4150 1,060.00 7/7/2022 Materials
4,500.25 7/7/2022
Forterra Concrete Products, Inc 4,500.25
FRANEK INCORPORATED 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-00496 - 6845 Ruby Lane
250.00 7/7/2022
FRANEK INCORPORATED 250.00
Franks Roderick & Robin 700-0000-2020 15.36 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101259-000, 756 STONEGATE ROAD
Franks Roderick & Robin 720-0000-2020 3.67 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101259-000, 756 STONEGATE ROAD
Franks Roderick & Robin 700-0000-2020 1.91 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101259-000, 756 STONEGATE ROAD
Franks Roderick & Robin 701-0000-2020 17.12 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101259-000, 756 STONEGATE ROAD
38.06 7/21/2022
Franks Roderick & Robin 38.06
FRED NORDAHL CONSTRUCTION INC 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-01516 - 7195 Frontier Trail
250.00 7/7/2022
FRED NORDAHL CONSTRUCTION INC 250.00
Gatto Sharon & David 101-0000-2076 5,718.57 7/21/2022 Security Escrow - 9631 Foxford Road
5,718.57 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 17 of 43
104
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Gatto Sharon & David 5,718.57
Go Gymnastics 101-1537-4343 1,470.00 7/21/2022 lessons
Go Gymnastics 101-1538-4343 892.50 7/21/2022 lessons
2,362.50 7/21/2022
Go Gymnastics 2,362.50
GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2075 750.00 7/21/2022 Landscape - Permit 2021-00398 - 740 Hawkcrest Circle
750.00 7/21/2022
GONYEA HOMES 750.00
GRAYBAR 101-1350-4120 867.12 7/7/2022 Supplies
867.12 7/7/2022
GRAYBAR 101-1350-4120 1,948.05 7/28/2022 RSX LED P4 40K R3 MVOLT RPA DDBXD
GRAYBAR 101-1350-4120 9,925.56 7/28/2022 Sqh250-1FS317-LB-SW
11,873.61 7/28/2022
GRAYBAR 12,740.73
GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC 101-1540-4130 911.79 7/21/2022 Supplies
911.79 7/21/2022
GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC 911.79
Green Matthew 700-7204-4901 50.00 7/21/2022 Waterwise Rebate
50.00 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 18 of 43
105
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Green Matthew 50.00
GREEN MEADOWS INC 101-1260-1193 128.86 7/21/2022 Lawn Mowing
GREEN MEADOWS INC 101-1260-1193 302.97 7/21/2022 Lawn Mowing
431.83 7/21/2022
GREEN MEADOWS INC 431.83
Grund Thomas 101-1540-4130 16.95 7/14/2022 Concession stand supplies
16.95 7/14/2022
Grund Thomas 16.95
GYM WORKS INC 101-1530-4530 400.00 7/14/2022 Gym Equipment Maintenance
400.00 7/14/2022
GYM WORKS INC 400.00
Haga Gerald & Sherry 101-0000-2073 500.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02231 - 3820 Leslee Curve
500.00 7/7/2022
Haga Gerald & Sherry 500.00
Hamilton Amy 101-1125-4300 409.95 7/7/2022 Resume Writers
409.95 7/7/2022
Hamilton Amy 409.95
HANSEN HOMETECH 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-01783 - 6857 Manchester Drive
250.00 7/7/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 19 of 43
106
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
HANSEN HOMETECH 250.00
HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 1,380.02 7/7/2022 July Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 2,760.04 7/7/2022 July Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 3,448.98 7/7/2022 July Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.210-0000-2012 690.01 7/7/2022 July Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 3,448.98 7/7/2022 July Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,380.02 7/7/2022 July Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 22,080.32 7/7/2022 July Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 39,663.27 7/7/2022 July Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 1,380.02 7/7/2022 July Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,724.49 7/7/2022 July Insurance
77,956.15 7/7/2022
HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 2,760.04 7/14/2022 August Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 22,770.33 7/14/2022 August Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 1,035.01 7/14/2022 August Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.210-0000-2012 690.01 7/14/2022 August Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,724.49 7/14/2022 August Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 2,415.04 7/14/2022 August Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,380.02 7/14/2022 August Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 3,448.98 7/14/2022 August Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 3,448.98 7/14/2022 August Insurance
HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 44,836.74 7/14/2022 August Insurance
84,509.64 7/14/2022
HealthPartners, Inc. 162,465.79
HENNEPIN COUNTY 101-1150-4501 25.00 7/28/2022 Assessment annual billing
25.00 7/28/2022
HENNEPIN COUNTY 25.00
Henry Michael 101-1560-4345 100.00 7/21/2022 Presentation
100.00 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 20 of 43
107
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Henry Michael 100.00
Holt Tour and Charter Inc 101-1560-4349 650.00 7/28/2022 motor coach-Orpheum Theatre 7/28/2022
650.00 7/28/2022
Holt Tour and Charter Inc 650.00
Hopkins Sports Camps LLC 101-1731-3636 376.00 7/21/2022 Camp
376.00 7/21/2022
Hopkins Sports Camps LLC 376.00
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 101-1530-4320 2,783.20 7/14/2022 Utiliites
2,783.20 7/14/2022
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 2,783.20
Indigo Signs 101-1370-4530 360.00 7/7/2022 Signs
360.00 7/7/2022
Indigo Signs 101-1220-4120 601.83 7/14/2022 Tags
Indigo Signs 720-7201-4130 250.00 7/14/2022 Signs
Indigo Signs 400-1220-4704 2,200.00 7/14/2022 Graphics
3,051.83 7/14/2022
Indigo Signs 101-1600-4130 1,295.00 7/21/2022 Signs
Indigo Signs 101-1600-4300 540.00 7/21/2022 Signs
Indigo Signs 400-4135-4704 1,764.03 7/21/2022 Graphics for City Vehicle
3,599.03 7/21/2022
Indigo Signs 7,010.86
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 21 of 43
108
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Integrity Remodeling & Design Group 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-00786 - 7107 Highover Drive
250.00 7/7/2022
Integrity Remodeling & Design Group 250.00
IUOE Local #49 701-0000-2004 83.29 7/14/2022 PR Batch 00414.07.2022 Local 49 dues
IUOE Local #49 101-0000-2004 455.00 7/14/2022 PR Batch 00414.07.2022 Local 49 dues
IUOE Local #49 700-0000-2004 126.71 7/14/2022 PR Batch 00414.07.2022 Local 49 dues
665.00 7/14/2022
IUOE Local #49 665.00
J&M Displays, Inc 101-1613-4300 23,000.00 7/7/2022 July 4th Fireworks Display
23,000.00 7/7/2022
J&M Displays, Inc 23,000.00
JARVIS JEFFREY & JANNA 700-0000-2020 49.50 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019520-000, 630 SANTA VERA
JARVIS JEFFREY & JANNA 700-0000-2020 3.75 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019520-000, 630 SANTA VERA
JARVIS JEFFREY & JANNA 720-0000-2020 27.90 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019520-000, 630 SANTA VERA
JARVIS JEFFREY & JANNA 701-0000-2020 82.57 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019520-000, 630 SANTA VERA
163.72 7/21/2022
JARVIS JEFFREY & JANNA 163.72
Jetter Clean, Inc 701-0000-4551 577.00 7/7/2022 Services Work
577.00 7/7/2022
Jetter Clean, Inc 577.00
Jim's Excavating 101-0000-2033 4.20 7/7/2022 Overpayment - Permit 2022-02090 - 1120 Hesse Farm Rd
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 22 of 43
109
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
4.20 7/7/2022
Jim's Excavating 4.20
Kerr Matt 101-1160-4380 48.46 7/21/2022 Travel Reimbursement
48.46 7/21/2022
Kerr Matt 48.46
Koch William 700-7204-4901 100.00 7/14/2022 Waterwise Rebate
100.00 7/14/2022
Koch William 100.00
Kottke-Alberts Jennifer 601-6047-4300 425.60 7/21/2022 Driveway
425.60 7/21/2022
Kottke-Alberts Jennifer 425.60
Kraft Bruce 700-7204-4901 50.00 7/21/2022 Waterwise Rebate
50.00 7/21/2022
Kraft Bruce 50.00
Lacount Sales, LLC 101-1550-4120 63.00 7/28/2022 AAA/D cell/9V batteries
63.00 7/28/2022
Lacount Sales, LLC 63.00
LAKE TITLE LLC 720-0000-2020 34.86 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099393-000, 6930 RUBY LANE
LAKE TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 136.07 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099393-000, 6930 RUBY LANE
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 23 of 43
110
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
LAKE TITLE LLC 701-0000-2020 92.57 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099393-000, 6930 RUBY LANE
LAKE TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 4.69 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099393-000, 6930 RUBY LANE
LAKE TITLE LLC 701-0000-2020 102.45 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100642-006, 1520 PEMBROKE PASS
LAKE TITLE LLC 720-0000-2020 54.31 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100642-006, 1520 PEMBROKE PASS
LAKE TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 8.45 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100642-006, 1520 PEMBROKE PASS
LAKE TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 50.52 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100642-006, 1520 PEMBROKE PASS
483.92 7/21/2022
LAKE TITLE LLC 483.92
Lawson Products, Inc.101-1320-4120 38.20 7/14/2022 Supplies
38.20 7/14/2022
Lawson Products, Inc. 38.20
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 101-1120-4370 110.00 7/28/2022 MCMA Dinner-Hokkanen/Unmacht
110.00 7/28/2022
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 110.00
LEMKE TRAVIS 700-7204-4901 50.00 7/14/2022 Waterwise Rebate
50.00 7/14/2022
LEMKE TRAVIS 50.00
Lilla James 700-7204-4901 50.00 7/14/2022 Waterwise Rebate
50.00 7/14/2022
Lilla James 50.00
Lindblad Scott 101-0000-2073 500.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2015-00629 - 10441 Bluff Circle
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 24 of 43
111
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
500.00 7/7/2022
Lindblad Scott 500.00
Lindblad Scott and Marsha 101-0000-2073 500.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2016-02578 - 10441 Bluff Circle
500.00 7/7/2022
Lindblad Scott and Marsha 500.00
Mds Remodeling 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-00077 - 6209 Powers Blvd
250.00 7/7/2022
Mds Remodeling 250.00
Metronet Holdings, LLC 700-7043-4311 55.31 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
55.31 7/7/2022
Metronet Holdings, LLC 55.31
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 701-0000-4509 217,038.58 7/14/2022 Waste Water
217,038.58 7/14/2022
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 217,038.58
MID COUNTY COOP 101-1370-4170 12,717.79 7/28/2022 87 Oct Gas
12,717.79 7/28/2022
MID COUNTY COOP 12,717.79
Mills Alan 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2016-02676 - 9040 Springfield Drive
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 25 of 43
112
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
250.00 7/7/2022
Mills Alan 250.00
Minnesota Roadways Co 420-0000-4150 249.28 7/14/2022 Materails
249.28 7/14/2022
Minnesota Roadways Co 249.28
MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 700-0000-4370 150.00 7/21/2022 Training - Ryan Brant
MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 700-0000-4370 150.00 7/21/2022 Training - Bill Kistner
300.00 7/21/2022
MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 300.00
Minnesota Safety Council 101-1560-4343 299.00 7/14/2022 Drivers class
Minnesota Safety Council 101-1560-4343 345.00 7/14/2022 Drivers class
644.00 7/14/2022
Minnesota Safety Council 644.00
Minnesota Secretary of State - Notary 101-1120-4360 120.00 7/28/2022 Notary-Osen
120.00 7/28/2022
Minnesota Secretary of State - Notary 120.00
Minuteman Press 101-1170-4110 23.00 7/28/2022 business cards-Grinnell
23.00 7/28/2022
Minuteman Press 23.00
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 26 of 43
113
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
MJ PRODUCTIONS 101-1620-4345 500.00 7/28/2022 Concert Series Performance-7/28/22
500.00 7/28/2022
MJ PRODUCTIONS 500.00
MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 701-0000-2037 7.99 7/14/2022 PR Batch 00414.07.2022 NCPERS-Life Insurance
MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 101-0000-2037 96.00 7/14/2022 PR Batch 00414.07.2022 NCPERS-Life Insurance
MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 700-0000-2037 8.01 7/14/2022 PR Batch 00414.07.2022 NCPERS-Life Insurance
112.00 7/14/2022
MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 112.00
MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 496.22 7/21/2022 Supplies
496.22 7/21/2022
MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 286.30 7/28/2022 end-rod/10" wheel asm
286.30 7/28/2022
MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 782.52
MYSLIVECEK ED 101-0000-2073 1,000.00 7/21/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-01861 - 10151 Great Plains Blvd
1,000.00 7/21/2022
MYSLIVECEK ED 1,000.00
NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 101-1550-4150 4,750.00 7/14/2022 Materials
4,750.00 7/14/2022
NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 101-1550-4300 880.00 7/28/2022 engineered wood fiber safety surfacing
880.00 7/28/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 27 of 43
114
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 5,630.00
NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 700-0000-4320 6,662.95 7/21/2022 Monthly Service
NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 701-0000-4320 3,536.64 7/21/2022 Monthly Service
NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 101-1350-4320 163.40 7/21/2022 Monthly Service
10,362.99 7/21/2022
NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 10,362.99
OB MULLIGAN, LLC 720-0000-2020 5.38 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099660-000, 7965 STONE CREEK DR-130
OB MULLIGAN, LLC 701-0000-2020 31.65 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099660-000, 7965 STONE CREEK DR-130
OB MULLIGAN, LLC 700-0000-2020 0.84 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099660-000, 7965 STONE CREEK DR-130
OB MULLIGAN, LLC 700-0000-2020 3.75 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099660-000, 7965 STONE CREEK DR-130
OB MULLIGAN, LLC 700-0000-2020 11.31 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099660-000, 7965 STONE CREEK DR-130
52.93 7/21/2022
OB MULLIGAN, LLC 52.93
Oertel Architects 402-1316-4702 7,417.00 7/21/2022 Chanhassen Fuel Island
7,417.00 7/21/2022
Oertel Architects 7,417.00
Opheim Sandra 700-0000-2020 9.34 7/21/2022 Refund Check 008412-000, 8305 STONE CREEK DRIVE
Opheim Sandra 701-0000-2020 3.93 7/21/2022 Refund Check 008412-000, 8305 STONE CREEK DRIVE
13.27 7/21/2022
Opheim Sandra 13.27
OUTDOOR SOLUTIONS INC 101-0000-2073 500.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2022-01424 - 8572 Drake Court
500.00 7/7/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 28 of 43
115
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
OUTDOOR SOLUTIONS INC 500.00
Partac Construction Group Chartered 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-01021 - 6893 Highover Drive
250.00 7/7/2022
Partac Construction Group Chartered 250.00
Peak Heating and Cooling 101-1250-3305 166.02 7/21/2022 Refund - Permit P2022-02428 - 2540 Arrowhead Ln
Peak Heating and Cooling 101-0000-2022 2.41 7/21/2022 Refund - Permit P2022-02428 - 2540 Arrowhead Ln
168.43 7/21/2022
Peak Heating and Cooling 168.43
Peters Steve 720-7207-4570 85.00 7/14/2022 Sprinkler Head Repair
85.00 7/14/2022
Peters Steve 85.00
Peterson Dennis 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-02225 - 6269 Chaska Road
250.00 7/7/2022
Peterson Dennis 250.00
Pierre Ronda & Dan 700-7204-4901 100.00 7/14/2022 Waterwise Rebate
100.00 7/14/2022
Pierre Ronda & Dan 100.00
PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 101-1220-4300 443.80 7/7/2022 Cleaning Services
443.80 7/7/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 29 of 43
116
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 443.80
Pinnacle Pest Control 700-7019-4300 125.00 7/7/2022 Pest Control
Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1170-4300 200.00 7/7/2022 Pest Control
Pinnacle Pest Control 700-7043-4300 125.00 7/7/2022 Pest Control
Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1220-4300 200.00 7/7/2022 Pest Control
Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1370-4300 250.00 7/7/2022 Pest Control
Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1190-4300 225.00 7/7/2022 Pest Control
1,125.00 7/7/2022
Pinnacle Pest Control 1,125.00
Pioneer Research Corporation 701-0000-4150 325.33 7/21/2022 Materials
325.33 7/21/2022
Pioneer Research Corporation 325.33
POSTMASTER 701-1130-4330 516.75 7/28/2022 July Utililty Statements Permit #14
POSTMASTER 700-1130-4330 516.75 7/28/2022 July Utililty Statements Permit #14
POSTMASTER 720-1130-4330 258.36 7/28/2022 July Utililty Statements Permit #14
1,291.86 7/28/2022
POSTMASTER 1,291.86
Precision Decks LLC 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-00612 - 9450 Foxford Road
250.00 7/7/2022
Precision Decks LLC 250.00
Premier Lawn & Landscape LLC 700-7019-4510 250.00 7/21/2022 Fertilizer/Weed Control
Premier Lawn & Landscape LLC 700-7043-4510 140.00 7/21/2022 Fertilizer/Weed Control
Premier Lawn & Landscape LLC 700-0000-4510 600.00 7/21/2022 Fertilizer/Weed Control
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 30 of 43
117
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
990.00 7/21/2022
Premier Lawn & Landscape LLC 990.00
Pulse Electric 101-1170-4510 703.00 7/21/2022 Sonic Washer
703.00 7/21/2022
Pulse Electric 703.00
RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 720-7202-4300 349.60 7/28/2022 Fox Woods oak 2-line treatment
349.60 7/28/2022
RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 349.60
RAMARAJ KAMINI 700-0000-2020 3.03 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019683-003, 1491 PEMBROKE PASS
RAMARAJ KAMINI 720-0000-2020 17.53 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019683-003, 1491 PEMBROKE PASS
RAMARAJ KAMINI 701-0000-2020 114.36 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019683-003, 1491 PEMBROKE PASS
RAMARAJ KAMINI 700-0000-2020 64.74 7/21/2022 Refund Check 019683-003, 1491 PEMBROKE PASS
199.66 7/21/2022
RAMARAJ KAMINI 199.66
REALTECH TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 5.13 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101064-000, 7407 LAREDO DRIVE
REALTECH TITLE LLC 701-0000-2020 8.47 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101064-000, 7407 LAREDO DRIVE
REALTECH TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 0.80 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101064-000, 7407 LAREDO DRIVE
REALTECH TITLE LLC 720-0000-2020 5.93 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101064-000, 7407 LAREDO DRIVE
20.33 7/21/2022
REALTECH TITLE LLC 20.33
RED CEDAR POINT LLC 701-0000-2020 22.93 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101669-000, 3616 RED CEDAR PT RD
RED CEDAR POINT LLC 700-0000-2020 2.39 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101669-000, 3616 RED CEDAR PT RD
RED CEDAR POINT LLC 720-0000-2020 17.82 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101669-000, 3616 RED CEDAR PT RD
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 31 of 43
118
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
RED CEDAR POINT LLC 700-0000-2020 6.69 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101669-000, 3616 RED CEDAR PT RD
49.83 7/21/2022
RED CEDAR POINT LLC 49.83
Regents of the University of MN 720-7202-4300 65.00 7/7/2022 UMN Plant Lab Testing
65.00 7/7/2022
Regents of the University of MN 65.00
REISS SUE 700-7204-4901 100.00 7/21/2022 Waterwise Rebate
100.00 7/21/2022
REISS SUE 100.00
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 720-7202-4300 1,241.00 7/14/2022 Hwy 61 Roundabout Veg Management
1,241.00 7/14/2022
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 1,241.00
RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 67.52 7/21/2022 Refund Check 098527-000, 6206 CASCADE PASS
RESULTS TITLE 720-0000-2020 34.49 7/21/2022 Refund Check 098527-000, 6206 CASCADE PASS
RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 4.64 7/21/2022 Refund Check 098527-000, 6206 CASCADE PASS
RESULTS TITLE 701-0000-2020 130.66 7/21/2022 Refund Check 098527-000, 6206 CASCADE PASS
RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.59 7/21/2022 Refund Check 102339-000, 7535 FAWN HILL ROAD
RESULTS TITLE 701-0000-2020 14.32 7/21/2022 Refund Check 102339-000, 7535 FAWN HILL ROAD
RESULTS TITLE 720-0000-2020 11.78 7/21/2022 Refund Check 102339-000, 7535 FAWN HILL ROAD
RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 8.09 7/21/2022 Refund Check 102339-000, 7535 FAWN HILL ROAD
RESULTS TITLE 720-0000-2020 6.24 7/21/2022 Refund Check 098729-000, 512 MISSION HILLS DRIVE
RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 3.24 7/21/2022 Refund Check 098729-000, 512 MISSION HILLS DRIVE
RESULTS TITLE 701-0000-2020 33.18 7/21/2022 Refund Check 098729-000, 512 MISSION HILLS DRIVE
RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 32.33 7/21/2022 Refund Check 098729-000, 512 MISSION HILLS DRIVE
RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 4.00 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101045-000, 7881 HARVEST LANE
RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.60 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101045-000, 7881 HARVEST LANE
RESULTS TITLE 701-0000-2020 4.56 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101045-000, 7881 HARVEST LANE
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 32 of 43
119
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
RESULTS TITLE 720-0000-2020 0.38 7/21/2022 Refund Check 101045-000, 7881 HARVEST LANE
357.62 7/21/2022
RESULTS TITLE 357.62
Retka Thomas 101-1620-4345 600.00 7/7/2022 Concert Series Performance
600.00 7/7/2022
Retka Thomas 600.00
Richard Alan Productions 101-1620-4345 400.00 7/28/2022 Concert Series Performance-7/28/2022
400.00 7/28/2022
Richard Alan Productions 400.00
RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 720-0000-4300 113.26 7/21/2022 Beach Monitoring
RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 720-0000-4300 113.26 7/21/2022 Beach Monitoring
226.52 7/21/2022
RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 226.52
Roder Val 101-1560-4343 200.00 7/14/2022 Chair Yoga
200.00 7/14/2022
Roder Val 200.00
Sagstetter Curtis 101-1320-4240 129.99 7/28/2022 Waterproof bibs
129.99 7/28/2022
Sagstetter Curtis 129.99
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 33 of 43
120
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Sajady Masood 101-0000-2073 500.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2014-02593 - 510 Bighorn Drive
Sajady Masood 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2011-02703 - 510 Bighorn Drive
750.00 7/7/2022
Sajady Masood 750.00
Sanders Shawn 101-0000-2021 10.30 7/14/2022 Pavilion Refund
Sanders Shawn 101-1541-3634 139.70 7/14/2022 Pavilion Refund
150.00 7/14/2022
Sanders Shawn 150.00
Scherber Co LLC 101-0000-2073 1,000.00 7/7/2022 Erosion control - Permit 2017-00368 - 7500 Chanhassen Road
Scherber Co LLC 101-0000-2073 1,500.00 7/7/2022 Erosion control - Permit 2017-00113 - 7405 Frontier Trail
2,500.00 7/7/2022
Scherber Co LLC 2,500.00
Schmidt Stephen Joseph 101-1620-4345 550.00 7/14/2022 Concert Performance
550.00 7/14/2022
Schmidt Stephen Joseph 550.00
Schwickert Company 101-1170-4530 30,695.00 7/7/2022 Furnace Replacement
30,695.00 7/7/2022
Schwickert Company 101-1170-4510 910.00 7/21/2022 Repair
Schwickert Company 101-1170-4510 310.00 7/21/2022 Repair
Schwickert Company 101-1170-4510 1,255.00 7/21/2022 Repair
Schwickert Company 101-1190-4510 130.00 7/21/2022 Materials
Schwickert Company 101-1170-4510 1,255.00 7/21/2022 Repair
3,860.00 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 34 of 43
121
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Schwickert Company 101-1170-4530 275.00 7/28/2022 Replace compressor contactor
Schwickert Company 101-1370-4530 695.00 7/28/2022 Replace thermostat & run new wire
Schwickert Company 101-1370-4530 595.00 7/28/2022 Replace thermostat
Schwickert Company 101-1190-4510 470.00 7/28/2022 unit repairs
Schwickert Company 101-1170-4530 490.00 7/28/2022 Replace compressor contactor/condenser fan
Schwickert Company 101-1370-4530 595.00 7/28/2022 Replace thermostat
Schwickert Company 101-1370-4510 595.00 7/28/2022 replace thermostat
Schwickert Company 101-1370-4510 595.00 7/28/2022 replace thermostat
Schwickert Company 101-1170-4530 160.00 7/28/2022 Replace Run Capacitor
Schwickert Company 101-1190-4510 1,550.00 7/28/2022 unit repairs
Schwickert Company 101-1170-4530 322.00 7/28/2022 Replace compressor contactor
Schwickert Company 101-1170-4530 580.00 7/28/2022 fin comb
6,922.00 7/28/2022
Schwickert Company 41,477.00
Scrapbusters 101-0000-2073 500.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2017-00240 - 1700 Flying Cloud Dr
500.00 7/7/2022
Scrapbusters 500.00
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 101-1320-4120 136.50 7/28/2022 gun repair kit
136.50 7/28/2022
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 136.50
SiteOne Landscape Supply 720-7202-4320 233.09 7/14/2022 Supplies
233.09 7/14/2022
SiteOne Landscape Supply 233.09
SM HENTGES & SONS 605-6502-4751 1,010,729.53 7/28/2022 CSAH 101-Pioneer Trail to Flying Cloud Drive
1,010,729.53 7/28/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 35 of 43
122
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
SM HENTGES & SONS 1,010,729.53
SMITH JOHNNA & DAVID 720-0000-2020 77.47 7/21/2022 Refund Check 097402-000, 404 CIMARRON CIRCLE
SMITH JOHNNA & DAVID 701-0000-2020 121.44 7/21/2022 Refund Check 097402-000, 404 CIMARRON CIRCLE
SMITH JOHNNA & DAVID 700-0000-2020 102.52 7/21/2022 Refund Check 097402-000, 404 CIMARRON CIRCLE
SMITH JOHNNA & DAVID 700-0000-2020 10.41 7/21/2022 Refund Check 097402-000, 404 CIMARRON CIRCLE
311.84 7/21/2022
SMITH JOHNNA & DAVID 311.84
SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 101-1170-4510 1,087.00 7/21/2022 Service
1,087.00 7/21/2022
SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 1,087.00
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1410-4336 33.08 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1110-4336 51.45 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1120-4336 25.73 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1613-4340 750.00 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1110-4336 33.08 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1310-4336 102.90 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1410-4336 29.40 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1210-4336 29.40 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1613-4340 600.00 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1613-4340 1,639.50 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1613-4340 375.00 7/21/2022 Publishing
Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1613-4340 1,475.28 7/21/2022 Publishing
5,144.82 7/21/2022
Southwest Suburban Publishing 5,144.82
Strand Kendall 700-7204-4901 50.00 7/21/2022 Waterwise Rebate
50.00 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 36 of 43
123
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Strand Kendall 50.00
Sturgis Jacob & Cari 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/21/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-04529 - 3931 Leslee Curve
250.00 7/21/2022
Sturgis Jacob & Cari 250.00
Stutelberg Mary 601-6047-4300 182.04 7/21/2022 Repair - AquaPro
182.04 7/21/2022
Stutelberg Mary 182.04
Tanner Douglas 101-0000-2072 2,500.00 7/7/2022 As-Built - Permit 2020-00377 - 3211 Dartmouth Drive
2,500.00 7/7/2022
Tanner Douglas 2,500.00
The Hartford 101-0000-2015 1,325.38 7/14/2022 LTD - July
The Hartford 720-0000-2015 58.88 7/14/2022 LTD - July
The Hartford 700-0000-2015 99.75 7/14/2022 LTD - July
The Hartford 701-0000-2015 64.16 7/14/2022 LTD - July
The Hartford 210-0000-2015 19.78 7/14/2022 LTD - July
1,567.95 7/14/2022
The Hartford 1,567.95
THE TITLE GROUP 700-0000-2020 41.35 7/21/2022 Refund Check 097179-000, 8531 MERGANSER COURT
THE TITLE GROUP 701-0000-2020 84.47 7/21/2022 Refund Check 097179-000, 8531 MERGANSER COURT
THE TITLE GROUP 720-0000-2020 13.19 7/21/2022 Refund Check 097179-000, 8531 MERGANSER COURT
THE TITLE GROUP 700-0000-2020 1.78 7/21/2022 Refund Check 097179-000, 8531 MERGANSER COURT
140.79 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 37 of 43
124
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
THE TITLE GROUP 140.79
The Vanella Group of MN LLC 101-1613-4300 3,500.00 7/21/2022 4th of July garbage operation
The Vanella Group of MN LLC 720-7201-4300 6,497.56 7/21/2022 4th of July garbage operation
9,997.56 7/21/2022
The Vanella Group of MN LLC 9,997.56
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 210-0000-4300 381.00 7/7/2022 Meeting Notes
381.00 7/7/2022
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 210-0000-4300 308.00 7/21/2022 Meeting minutes
308.00 7/21/2022
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 689.00
Titan Energy Systems 700-7025-4704 16,763.20 7/21/2022 Generator
Titan Energy Systems 701-7025-4704 16,763.20 7/21/2022 Generator
33,526.40 7/21/2022
Titan Energy Systems 33,526.40
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 700-0000-2020 14.51 7/21/2022 Refund Check 096604-000, 8975 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 701-0000-2020 29.80 7/21/2022 Refund Check 096604-000, 8975 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 700-0000-2020 1.45 7/21/2022 Refund Check 096604-000, 8975 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 720-0000-2020 2.08 7/21/2022 Refund Check 096604-000, 8975 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP
47.84 7/21/2022
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 47.84
TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 101-1350-4120 1,200.00 7/28/2022 annual intersection maintenance-78th & Laredo Dr
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 38 of 43
125
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
1,200.00 7/28/2022
TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 1,200.00
TruWest LLC 101-0000-2072 2,500.00 7/14/2022 As-Built - Permit 2019-01679 - 740 Crossroads Court
2,500.00 7/14/2022
TruWest LLC 2,500.00
Truwest, LLC 101-0000-2072 2,500.00 7/21/2022 As-Built - 725 Crossroads Court - Permit 2020-00892
2,500.00 7/21/2022
Truwest, LLC 2,500.00
TWO TEACHER CONSTRUCTION 101-0000-2073 250.00 7/7/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2022-00852 - 1100 Lake Lucy Rd
250.00 7/7/2022
TWO TEACHER CONSTRUCTION 250.00
Unmacht Matt 101-1120-4381 53.00 7/28/2022 Bag/seat fee
53.00 7/28/2022
Unmacht Matt 53.00
VALLEY-RICH CO INC 700-0000-4552 427.27 7/21/2022 Warning Lites
427.27 7/21/2022
VALLEY-RICH CO INC 427.27
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1520-4310 51.97 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1310-4310 220.85 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 39 of 43
126
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1220-4310 40.01 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 125.10 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1120-4310 314.82 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 210-0000-4310 41.21 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1550-4310 488.15 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1250-4310 368.69 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 703.37 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1170-4310 46.21 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1540-4310 40.01 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1530-4310 41.20 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1370-4310 89.47 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-0000-2033 11.08 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 848.12 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1600-4310 220.38 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1220-4310 692.39 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1160-4310 138.63 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 125.10 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1110-4300 40.01 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1320-4310 321.72 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
VERIZON WIRELESS 720-0000-4310 433.16 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
5,401.65 7/7/2022
VERIZON WIRELESS 5,401.65
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1170-4329 262.09 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1220-4329 104.15 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1370-4329 136.99 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1190-4329 362.02 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1220-4329 38.71 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 720-7202-4329 82.27 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1550-4329 634.05 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 700-0000-4329 17.12 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 701-0000-4329 17.12 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
1,654.52 7/14/2022
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1613-4410 633.34 7/28/2022 4th of July City Center/Carnival dumpster
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1613-4410 1,189.14 7/28/2022 4th of July Lake Ann dumpster
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1550-4300 364.81 7/28/2022 garbage service-Lake Ann
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 40 of 43
127
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
2,187.29 7/28/2022
Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 3,841.81
WATERMARK TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.60 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020325-002, 7491 CANYON CURVE
WATERMARK TITLE 700-0000-2020 2.34 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020325-002, 7491 CANYON CURVE
WATERMARK TITLE 720-0000-2020 4.51 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020325-002, 7491 CANYON CURVE
WATERMARK TITLE 701-0000-2020 3.77 7/21/2022 Refund Check 020325-002, 7491 CANYON CURVE
WATERMARK TITLE 700-0000-2020 53.07 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100508-001, 7506 ERIE AVENUE
WATERMARK TITLE 720-0000-2020 30.61 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100508-001, 7506 ERIE AVENUE
WATERMARK TITLE 700-0000-2020 4.12 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100508-001, 7506 ERIE AVENUE
WATERMARK TITLE 701-0000-2020 87.02 7/21/2022 Refund Check 100508-001, 7506 ERIE AVENUE
186.04 7/21/2022
WATERMARK TITLE 186.04
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 45.04 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099214-000, 185 PLEASANT VIEW RD
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 4.40 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099214-000, 185 PLEASANT VIEW RD
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 720-0000-2020 32.71 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099214-000, 185 PLEASANT VIEW RD
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 701-0000-2020 57.38 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099214-000, 185 PLEASANT VIEW RD
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 720-0000-2020 12.35 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099399-000, 3980 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 701-0000-2020 29.86 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099399-000, 3980 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 21.20 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099399-000, 3980 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 1.66 7/21/2022 Refund Check 099399-000, 3980 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 701-0000-2020 64.21 7/21/2022 Refund Check 009224-000, 7004 DAKOTA AVE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 3.70 7/21/2022 Refund Check 009224-000, 7004 DAKOTA AVE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 40.72 7/21/2022 Refund Check 009224-000, 7004 DAKOTA AVE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 720-0000-2020 27.51 7/21/2022 Refund Check 009224-000, 7004 DAKOTA AVE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 720-0000-2020 10.37 7/21/2022 Refund Check 011784-000, 880 KIMBERLY LANE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 3.62 7/21/2022 Refund Check 011784-000, 880 KIMBERLY LANE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 20.55 7/21/2022 Refund Check 011784-000, 880 KIMBERLY LANE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 701-0000-2020 38.99 7/21/2022 Refund Check 011784-000, 880 KIMBERLY LANE
414.27 7/21/2022
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 414.27
WATEROUS COMPANY 101-1220-4120 967.00 7/14/2022 Supplies
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 41 of 43
128
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
967.00 7/14/2022
WATEROUS COMPANY 967.00
Westwind Swing Band, LLC 101-1620-4345 300.00 7/28/2022 Concert Series performance-7/21/2022
300.00 7/28/2022
Westwind Swing Band, LLC 300.00
Wickenhauser John 700-0000-4310 10.73 7/14/2022 Google Circuit
Wickenhauser John 701-0000-4310 10.73 7/14/2022 Google Circuit
21.46 7/14/2022
Wickenhauser John 21.46
Wilson Jennifer 720-7202-4130 50.00 7/21/2022 Tree Rebate
50.00 7/21/2022
Wilson Jennifer 50.00
WILSON'S NURSERY INC 720-7202-4300 4,080.30 7/28/2022 Hwy 101 Rotary project trees
4,080.30 7/28/2022
WILSON'S NURSERY INC 4,080.30
Yamaha Golf & Utility 101-1613-4410 425.00 7/21/2022 Golf Cart Rental
425.00 7/21/2022
Yamaha Golf & Utility 425.00
Zillow Closing Services 700-0000-2020 5.23 7/7/2022 Refund Check - 8581 Chan Hills Dr S
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 42 of 43
129
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
5.23 7/7/2022
Zillow Closing Services 5.23
1,827,561.23
AP - Check Detail-Checks (8/2/2022)Page 43 of 43
130
AP
Check Detail-ACH
User: dwashburn
Printed: 8/2/2022 12:17:23 PM
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 700-0000-4300 2,635.00 7/21/2022 Professional Services
2,635.00 7/21/2022
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 700-0000-4300 1,544.19 7/28/2022 2022 SCADA services
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 701-0000-4300 1,544.18 7/28/2022 2022 SCADA services
3,088.37 7/28/2022
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 5,723.37
Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1539-4343 75.00 7/21/2022 Pickleball Lessons
75.00 7/21/2022
Al-Hilwani Juli 75.00
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 101-0000-2008 39.78 7/7/2022 June Payable
39.78 7/7/2022
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78
Barr Engineering Company 700-7025-4300 6,075.50 7/28/2022 Well Rehabilitation Project
Barr Engineering Company 700-7025-4300 2,294.00 7/28/2022 Well Rehabilitation Project
Barr Engineering Company 700-7025-4300 2,888.00 7/28/2022 Well Rehabilitation Project
Barr Engineering Company 700-7025-4300 2,676.50 7/28/2022 Well Rehabilitation Project
13,934.00 7/28/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 1 of 19
131
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Barr Engineering Company 13,934.00
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 101-0000-2012 49.50 7/14/2022 Insurance
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 101-1120-4300 179.10 7/14/2022 Insurance
228.60 7/14/2022
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 228.60
BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4300 538.00 7/21/2022 Professional Services
BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6049-4300 33,589.46 7/21/2022 Professional Services
BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6048-4300 5,185.50 7/21/2022 Professional Services
39,312.96 7/21/2022
BOLTON & MENK INC 39,312.96
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6049-4300 3,153.55 7/21/2022 Pond Project
3,153.55 7/21/2022
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 3,153.55
BROADWAY AWARDS 101-1110-4375 95.89 7/14/2022 Award
95.89 7/14/2022
BROADWAY AWARDS 95.89
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-1140-4302 16,384.56 7/21/2022 Legal Services
16,384.56 7/21/2022
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 16,384.56
Carver County 410-0000-2019 96,309.77 7/7/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 2 of 19
132
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
96,309.77 7/7/2022
Carver County 701-1384-4556 1,300.25 7/21/2022 Water meters
Carver County 700-1384-4556 1,300.25 7/21/2022 Water meters
Carver County 700-1160-4326 650.00 7/21/2022 Carver Fiber
Carver County 101-1160-4326 375.00 7/21/2022 Carver Link Internet
3,625.50 7/21/2022
Carver County 101-1210-4506 29,375.26 7/28/2022 Police contract OT-2nd quarter
Carver County 101-1210-4300 250.00 7/28/2022 Background Investigation-Tono Pizzaria & Cheesesteaks
29,625.26 7/28/2022
Carver County 129,560.53
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 118.05 7/21/2022 June Invoice
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 1,876.77 7/21/2022 June Invoice
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 377.32 7/21/2022 June Invoice
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 30.81 7/21/2022 June Invoice
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 3,355.11 7/21/2022 June Invoice
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 401.79 7/21/2022 June Invoice
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 1,369.60 7/21/2022 June Invoice
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1220-4320 128.49 7/21/2022 June Invoice
7,657.94 7/21/2022
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 7,657.94
ClearGov Inc 101-1160-4228 6,221.66 7/28/2022 Personnel/Capital/Transparency Budgeting
6,221.66 7/28/2022
ClearGov Inc 6,221.66
Colliers Funding, LLC 480-0000-4804 132,659.62 7/21/2022 Tax Increment
132,659.62 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 3 of 19
133
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Colliers Funding, LLC 132,659.62
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 701-0000-2008 15.30 7/28/2022 July 2022
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 101-0000-2008 37.20 7/28/2022 July 2022
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 700-0000-2008 15.30 7/28/2022 July 2022
67.80 7/28/2022
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 67.80
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.400-4117-4703 371.80 7/21/2022 Backup Service Fee, Office365
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.400-4117-4703 17.00 7/21/2022 Azure AD P2 & Exchange 365
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.400-4117-4703 9.00 7/21/2022 Azure AD Premium
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.101-1160-4205 95.00 7/21/2022 SSL Certificate Renewal
492.80 7/21/2022
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.101-1160-4300 3,000.00 7/28/2022 Network services retainer
3,000.00 7/28/2022
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 3,492.80
Crystal Infosystems LLC 101-1175-4110 157.00 7/7/2022 Toner
157.00 7/7/2022
Crystal Infosystems LLC 157.00
Danial Reem 101-1539-4343 163.80 7/7/2022 Zumba Instructor
163.80 7/7/2022
Danial Reem 101-1539-4343 33.60 7/21/2022 Zumba Instruction
33.60 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 4 of 19
134
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Danial Reem 197.40
Delta Dental 701-0000-2013 258.31 7/21/2022 August Dental
Delta Dental 210-0000-2013 45.00 7/21/2022 August Dental
Delta Dental 101-0000-2013 3,383.10 7/21/2022 August Dental
Delta Dental 700-0000-2013 348.29 7/21/2022 August Dental
Delta Dental 720-0000-2013 219.15 7/21/2022 August Dental
4,253.85 7/21/2022
Delta Dental 4,253.85
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 700-0000-4140 418.18 7/21/2022 Supplies
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 101-1550-4120 22.94 7/21/2022 Supplies
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 101-1550-4140 836.36 7/21/2022 Supplies
1,277.48 7/21/2022
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 1,277.48
Engel Water Testing Inc 700-0000-4300 625.00 7/7/2022 Water Samples
625.00 7/7/2022
Engel Water Testing Inc 625.00
ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 720-7207-4150 550.80 7/21/2022 Materials
550.80 7/21/2022
ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 550.80
FASTENAL COMPANY 101-1550-4120 299.60 7/14/2022 Supplies
FASTENAL COMPANY 101-1550-4120 7.49 7/14/2022 Supplies
FASTENAL COMPANY 700-0000-4550 46.98 7/14/2022 Materials
354.07 7/14/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 5 of 19
135
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
FASTENAL COMPANY 101-1310-4240 104.16 7/21/2022 Safety Equipment
FASTENAL COMPANY 101-1320-4240 186.78 7/21/2022 Safety Clothing
290.94 7/21/2022
FASTENAL COMPANY 700-0000-4150 421.80 7/28/2022 S/S HCS 7/8-9x3 / 7/8"-9 S/S FHN
421.80 7/28/2022
FASTENAL COMPANY 1,066.81
Fidelity Security Life 700-0000-2007 12.07 7/21/2022 August Insurance
Fidelity Security Life 101-0000-2007 299.26 7/21/2022 August Insurance
Fidelity Security Life 701-0000-2007 5.63 7/21/2022 August Insurance
Fidelity Security Life 720-0000-2007 6.44 7/21/2022 August Insurance
323.40 7/21/2022
Fidelity Security Life 323.40
GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 101-0000-2033 50.00 7/7/2022 Overpayment - Permit P2022-02135 - 7907 Powers Blvd
50.00 7/7/2022
GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 50.00
HALLOCK COMPANY 701-0000-4120 222.78 7/21/2022 Supplies
222.78 7/21/2022
HALLOCK COMPANY 222.78
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 400-0000-1155 2,717.75 7/7/2022 Berrospid Addition
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 400-0000-1155 451.00 7/7/2022 Deer Haven
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 400-0000-1155 914.50 7/7/2022 Lake Place Apartments
4,083.25 7/7/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 6 of 19
136
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 4,083.25
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 13,343.02 7/7/2022 Chemicals
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7019-4160 7,175.18 7/7/2022 Chemicals
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7019-4160 7,518.40 7/7/2022 Chemicals
28,036.60 7/7/2022
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7019-4160 5,684.51 7/14/2022 Chemicals
5,684.51 7/14/2022
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 6,833.91 7/21/2022 Chemicals
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 10.00 7/21/2022 Chemicals
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 10.00 7/21/2022 Chemicals
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 30.00 7/21/2022 Chemicals
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 4,122.77 7/21/2022 Chemicals
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 9,777.36 7/21/2022 Chemicals
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 10.00 7/21/2022 Chemicals
20,794.04 7/21/2022
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 54,515.15
Health Strategies 101-1220-4352 34.00 7/28/2022 Mask Fit-Geske K
34.00 7/28/2022
Health Strategies 34.00
HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 401-0000-4706 1,009.73 7/7/2022 2022 CIP Implementation
1,009.73 7/7/2022
HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 101-1110-4300 2,100.00 7/14/2022 CIP Implementation
2,100.00 7/14/2022
HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 101-1420-4300 1,354.42 7/21/2022 Professional Services
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 7 of 19
137
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
1,354.42 7/21/2022
HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 4,464.15
Indoor Landscapes Inc 101-1170-4300 187.00 7/14/2022 July Plant Service
187.00 7/14/2022
Indoor Landscapes Inc 187.00
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 205.66 7/28/2022 index tabs/paper
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 156.77 7/28/2022 soap/cups/cleaner
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 12.22 7/28/2022 legal pad
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 80.71 7/28/2022 tape/paper/creamer/knife
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 106.33 7/28/2022 Organizer/tray/stapler/cup
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 47.21 7/28/2022 tape/seal/note pads
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 145.88 7/28/2022 organizer/letter opener/notebook/scissors/magnets/calculator
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 24.93 7/28/2022 soap/pens
779.71 7/28/2022
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 779.71
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 101-1250-4210 24.00 7/7/2022 Storm Shelters
24.00 7/7/2022
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 24.00
JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 101-1220-4260 415.48 7/21/2022 Equipment
415.48 7/21/2022
JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 101-1220-4260 127.97 7/28/2022 Streamlight Survivor LED Alk yellow
127.97 7/28/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 8 of 19
138
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 543.45
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 101-1140-4302 107.50 7/28/2022 Local 49 Labor/employment matters
107.50 7/28/2022
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 107.50
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 400-0000-1155 17,064.00 7/7/2022 Private Dev Field Observation
17,064.00 7/7/2022
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 605-6502-4300 25,919.46 7/28/2022 TH 101 Reconstruction
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 210-0000-4300 4,030.00 7/28/2022 Metronet Support Services
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 605-6503-4300 2,918.39 7/28/2022 TH 101 Reconstruction
32,867.85 7/28/2022
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 49,931.85
KREMER SERVICES 101-1370-4520 1,668.16 7/7/2022 Repair
1,668.16 7/7/2022
KREMER SERVICES 1,668.16
Life Support Innovations LLC 101-1370-4530 551.54 7/7/2022 Equipment
Life Support Innovations LLC 101-1170-4530 1,103.09 7/7/2022 Equipment
Life Support Innovations LLC 101-1220-4143 2,971.57 7/7/2022 Equipment
4,626.20 7/7/2022
Life Support Innovations LLC 4,626.20
Macqueen Emergency Group 201-0000-4705 1,449.80 7/14/2022 Supplies
1,449.80 7/14/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 9 of 19
139
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Macqueen Emergency Group 101-1220-4120 888.20 7/21/2022 Supplies
888.20 7/21/2022
Macqueen Emergency Group 101-1220-4142 1,450.00 7/28/2022 foam, class A
1,450.00 7/28/2022
Macqueen Emergency Group 3,788.00
Marco Inc 701-0000-4410 101.00 7/14/2022 Equipment Rental
Marco Inc 101-1170-4410 757.50 7/14/2022 Equipment Rental
Marco Inc 720-0000-4410 50.50 7/14/2022 Equipment Rental
Marco Inc 700-0000-4410 101.00 7/14/2022 Equipment Rental
1,010.00 7/14/2022
Marco Inc 101-1160-4411 735.00 7/21/2022 Copiers Lease
735.00 7/21/2022
Marco Inc 1,745.00
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4120 74.84 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1220-4142 116.91 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4260 20.69 7/14/2022 Tools
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1320-4150 8.26 7/14/2022 Materials
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 701-0000-4260 294.99 7/14/2022 Tools
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1220-4120 8.63 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1530-4130 19.20 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-7043-4120 45.87 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-0000-4140 5.39 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-0000-4120 32.29 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 760-1160-4134 93.30 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4151 31.80 7/14/2022 Materials
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 701-0000-4120 82.45 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 701-0000-4140 5.40 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1170-4510 77.32 7/14/2022 Materials
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4150 66.64 7/14/2022 Materials
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1220-4290 85.17 7/14/2022 Supplies
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 701-0000-4150 112.25 7/14/2022 Materials
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 10 of 19
140
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4510 32.90 7/14/2022 Materials
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-0000-4260 295.00 7/14/2022 Tools
1,509.30 7/14/2022
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 1,509.30
Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 101-1250-3816 -74.55 7/21/2022 June SAC
Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 701-0000-2023 7,455.00 7/21/2022 June SAC
7,380.45 7/21/2022
Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 7,380.45
Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 101-1550-4300 550.00 7/28/2022 Weed/Algae Control-Lotus Lake
550.00 7/28/2022
Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 550.00
MINGER CONSTRUCTION 720-7207-4410 2,790.00 7/14/2022 Rental
2,790.00 7/14/2022
MINGER CONSTRUCTION 2,790.00
Minnesota Equipment 101-1550-4120 374.84 7/28/2022 seal/o-rings/line
374.84 7/28/2022
Minnesota Equipment 374.84
MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 700-0000-4300 64.00 7/14/2022 Professional Services
MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 101-1550-4300 64.00 7/14/2022 Professional Services
MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 700-0000-4300 64.00 7/14/2022 Professional Services
MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 101-1320-4300 169.00 7/14/2022 Professional Services
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 11 of 19
141
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
361.00 7/14/2022
MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 361.00
MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-1250-3818 -85.82 7/21/2022 June Services
MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-0000-2022 4,290.98 7/21/2022 June Services
4,205.16 7/21/2022
MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 4,205.16
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 145.57 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 29.90 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 81.59 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 32.18 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
289.24 7/7/2022
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 700-0000-4320 143.80 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 5,130.15 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1600-4320 32.91 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 191.74 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 701-0000-4320 471.53 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
5,970.13 7/14/2022
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 92.94 7/21/2022 Monthly Service
92.94 7/21/2022
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 6,352.31
MOSS & BARNETT 210-0000-4300 1,158.50 7/28/2022 professional services-Mediacom Renewal
1,158.50 7/28/2022
MOSS & BARNETT 1,158.50
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 12 of 19
142
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 700-0000-4140 25.16 7/7/2022 Supplies
25.16 7/7/2022
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 105.27 7/14/2022 Supplies
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1220-4140 214.89 7/14/2022 Supplies
320.16 7/14/2022
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4140 52.16 7/21/2022 Supplies
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 701-0000-4120 122.13 7/21/2022 Supplies
174.29 7/21/2022
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 519.61
O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1320-4140 17.01 7/7/2022 Supplies
O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1320-4120 39.13 7/7/2022 Supplies
56.14 7/7/2022
O'Reilly Automotive Inc 56.14
Potentia MN Solar 700-0000-4320 2,190.46 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
Potentia MN Solar 101-1170-4320 3,152.57 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
Potentia MN Solar 101-1190-4320 4,075.14 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
9,418.17 7/14/2022
Potentia MN Solar 9,418.17
PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 101-1550-4120 46.02 7/7/2022 Supplies
46.02 7/7/2022
PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 46.02
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 720-7202-4300 780.00 7/21/2022 WWTP Prairie Management
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 720-7202-4300 560.00 7/21/2022 Bluff Creek Prairie Management
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 13 of 19
143
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
1,340.00 7/21/2022
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 720-7202-4300 450.00 7/28/2022 Century Blvd poll meadow mgmt
450.00 7/28/2022
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 1,790.00
Premium Waters, Inc 101-1550-4120 4.00 7/14/2022 Monthly Service
4.00 7/14/2022
Premium Waters, Inc 4.00
Quality Flow Systems Inc 701-0000-4551 16,140.00 7/14/2022 Repair
16,140.00 7/14/2022
Quality Flow Systems Inc 16,140.00
REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 101-1130-4301 34,578.60 7/7/2022 Professional Services
34,578.60 7/7/2022
REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 34,578.60
Rent N Save Portable Services 101-1613-4400 5,518.00 7/21/2022 Portable Restrooms
5,518.00 7/21/2022
Rent N Save Portable Services 5,518.00
SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR TRANS COAL 101-1110-4364 3,500.00 7/21/2022 2022 Dues
3,500.00 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 14 of 19
144
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR TRANS COAL 3,500.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 101-1310-4140 120.67 7/14/2022 Supplies
120.67 7/14/2022
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 101-1550-4140 56.76 7/21/2022 Supplies
56.76 7/21/2022
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 177.43
Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2011 17.03 7/14/2022 Life Insurance
Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2011 569.40 7/14/2022 Life Insurance
Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2037 158.64 7/14/2022 Life Insurance
Sun Life Financial 720-0000-2011 25.27 7/14/2022 Life Insurance
Sun Life Financial 210-0000-2011 8.42 7/14/2022 Life Insurance
Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2037 915.24 7/14/2022 Life Insurance
Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2037 158.64 7/14/2022 Life Insurance
Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2011 27.51 7/14/2022 Life Insurance
Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2011 42.80 7/14/2022 Life Insurance
1,922.95 7/14/2022
Sun Life Financial 1,922.95
TargetSolutions Learning, LLC 101-1220-4370 4,720.37 7/21/2022 Membership
4,720.37 7/21/2022
TargetSolutions Learning, LLC 4,720.37
TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RR CO 700-0000-4509 795.01 7/21/2022 Annual Fee
TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RR CO 700-0000-4509 250.00 7/21/2022 Annual Fee - Utility Crossing
1,045.01 7/21/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 15 of 19
145
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RR CO 1,045.01
Universal Athletic Services, Inc.101-1600-4130 1,589.22 7/7/2022 4th of July T-shirts for sponsors
1,589.22 7/7/2022
Universal Athletic Services, Inc.101-1613-4130 1,649.11 7/14/2022 4th of July t-shirts
Universal Athletic Services, Inc.101-1613-4130 1,500.00 7/14/2022 4th of July t-shirts
3,149.11 7/14/2022
Universal Athletic Services, Inc.101-1613-4130 330.00 7/21/2022 Supplies
330.00 7/21/2022
Universal Athletic Services, Inc. 5,068.33
Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc.101-1613-4410 2,794.00 7/14/2022 4th of July Traffic Control
2,794.00 7/14/2022
Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 2,794.00
Water Conservation Services, Inc.700-0000-4300 1,385.63 7/21/2022 Service
1,385.63 7/21/2022
Water Conservation Services, Inc. 1,385.63
WATSON COMPANY 101-1540-4130 38.22 7/7/2022 Supplies
WATSON COMPANY 101-1540-4130 1,239.46 7/7/2022 Supplies
1,277.68 7/7/2022
WATSON COMPANY 101-1540-4130 564.65 7/14/2022 Supplies
WATSON COMPANY 101-1540-4130 -145.18 7/14/2022 Refund
419.47 7/14/2022
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 16 of 19
146
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
WATSON COMPANY 101-1540-4130 396.38 7/21/2022 Supplies
WATSON COMPANY 101-1620-4130 20.38 7/21/2022 Supplies
416.76 7/21/2022
WATSON COMPANY 101-1540-4130 589.38 7/28/2022 Lake Ann Concession supplies
589.38 7/28/2022
WATSON COMPANY 2,703.29
WM MUELLER & SONS INC 700-0000-4550 192.00 7/7/2022 Materials
WM MUELLER & SONS INC 700-0000-4550 440.00 7/7/2022 Supplies
WM MUELLER & SONS INC 420-0000-4150 423.15 7/7/2022 Materials
1,055.15 7/7/2022
WM MUELLER & SONS INC 420-0000-4150 270.63 7/14/2022 Materials
WM MUELLER & SONS INC 420-0000-4150 281.79 7/14/2022 Materials
552.42 7/14/2022
WM MUELLER & SONS INC 700-0000-4550 40.00 7/21/2022 Materials
40.00 7/21/2022
WM MUELLER & SONS INC 1,647.57
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 101-1310-4300 143.40 7/14/2022 GIS/AMS Support Services
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 101-1320-4300 143.40 7/14/2022 GIS/AMS Support Services
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 700-0000-4300 143.40 7/14/2022 GIS/AMS Support Services
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-0000-4300 143.40 7/14/2022 GIS/AMS Support Services
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-0000-4300 592.50 7/14/2022 Water Resources Support
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 101-1110-4300 3,072.00 7/14/2022 Parks Referendum Task Force
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 701-0000-4300 143.40 7/14/2022 GIS/AMS Support Services
4,381.50 7/14/2022
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 601-6040-4300 22,895.20 7/21/2022 Galphin Blvd
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 601-6046-4300 2,707.75 7/21/2022 Professional Services - Lake Lucy Road Rehab
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 101-1310-4300 3,019.00 7/21/2022 Professional Services
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 17 of 19
147
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 420-1310-4546 4,958.06 7/21/2022 Professional Services - Annual Pavement Inspection
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-7025-4300 6,219.75 7/21/2022 Professional Services - Pond Maintenance
39,799.76 7/21/2022
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 44,181.26
XCEL ENERGY INC 701-0000-4320 -334.82 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 19,253.42 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 -2,389.63 7/7/2022 Monthly Service
16,528.97 7/7/2022
XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 5,745.38 7/21/2022 Monthly Service
5,745.38 7/21/2022
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1171-4320 93.47 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1170-4320 -806.24 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 170.41 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1190-4320 -197.84 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 10,447.25 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1220-4320 1,503.03 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1370-4320 2,100.05 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 701-0000-4320 262.51 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 700-7019-4320 7,712.79 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1540-4320 3,176.27 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 262.51 7/28/2022 electricity charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1550-4320 -222.04 7/28/2022 electricity charges
24,502.17 7/28/2022
XCEL ENERGY INC 46,776.52
ZIEGLER INC 101-1613-4410 1,050.40 7/21/2022 Light Towers - Rental
1,050.40 7/21/2022
ZIEGLER INC 701-0000-4120 175.60 7/28/2022 Filter/Element fuel
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 18 of 19
148
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
175.60 7/28/2022
ZIEGLER INC 1,226.00
703,730.46
AP - Check Detail-ACH (8/2/2022)Page 19 of 19
149
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Reappoint Youth Commissioners to the Park & Recreation Commission and
Environmental Commission
File No.Item No: D.6
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council reappoints Alexandra Jerdee to the Park & Recreation Commission
and Julia Adams to the Environmental Commission as youth commissioners for a one-year term
ending August 31, 2023."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
On October 11, 2021, the Chanhassen City Council appointed Alexandra Jerdee and Julia Adams as
youth commissioners on the Park & Recreation and Environmental Commissions, respectively. Terms
for youth commissioners are for one year expiring on August 31. Both Alexandra and Julia are eligible
to serve one more year as youth commissioners and they are both interested in serving a second year.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
150
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council reappoint Alexandra Jerdee to the Park & Recreation Commission
as a youth commissioner for a one-year term ending August 31, 2023; and reappoint Julia Adams to the
Environmental Commission as a youth commissioner for a one-year term ending August 31, 2023.
ATTACHMENTS
151
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Authorize Execution of Operations and Maintenance Agreement for the 7851
Park Drive Property
File No.Item No: D.7
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer
Reviewed By Charlie Howley
SUGGESTED ACTION
“The City Council authorizes execution of a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with Lotus
Holdings, LLC for the purposes of perpetual obligation by said entity to maintain a private
stormwater best management practice (BMP) system on the 7851 Park Drive Property.”
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
7851 Park Drive Storage Expansion proposed addition of an approximately 8,100 SF outdoor gravel
storage area and a one-way concrete drive entrance. The project included a stormwater BMP - a small
infiltration basin to provide stormwater rate, volume, and water quality control.
Properly designed, installed, and maintained private stormwater systems have the capacity to allow for
stormwater detention and/or infiltration. When not properly designed, installed, and/or maintained,
these systems could fail to facilitate the required detention and/or infiltration of stormwater as designed.
As such, it is important to ensure that an operations and maintenance agreement is in place with the
subject property owner. Said agreement shall require the proper design and installation and stipulate the
152
frequency and type of maintenance to be performed.
DISCUSSION
The attached Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement was developed by City Staff and
Attorney as part of the private property improvement project. Mark Hedge, Manager of Lotus Holdings,
LLC, has signed and agreed to the attached agreement.
BUDGET
N/A
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approving the execution of the Operations and Maintenance agreement with Lotus
Holdings, LLC for the 7851 Park Drive Property.
ATTACHMENTS
Stormwater Maintenance Agreement - Lotus Holdings
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
PARK DRIVEWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET
WET
WET WET12
9
920.0
925.0
930.0
917.
0
918.
0
919.0
921.0
922.0
923.0
924.0
926.0
927.0
928.0
929.0
931.0
920.0920.
0
920.
0
920.0 920.0920.0
925.0925.0925.
0
925.0 925.0925.0
930.0930.
0 930.0930.0930.0
930.0917.
0
917.
0
917.0 917.0917.0
917.0
918.
0
918.
0
918.0 918.0918.0
918.0
919.
0
919.
0
919.0 919.0919.0
919.0
921.0921.
0
921.
0
921.0 921.0921.0
922.0
922.
0
922.
0
922.0 922.0922.0
923.0923.0923.
0
923.0 923.0923.0
924.0924.0924.
0
924.0 924.0924.0
926.0926.0926.
0
926.0 926.0926.0
927.0927.0927.
0
927.0 927.0927.0
928.0928.
0
928.
0 928.0928.
0
928.0929.0929.
0
929.
0 929.0929.0
929.0931.0931.
0 931.0931.0931.0931.0
935.0
934.0
936.0
936.
0
936.0
937.0
935.
0 935.0935.0935.0
935.0
935.0934.0936.0
934.0
934.0 934.0934.0934.
0 934.0936.0
936.0
936.0936.0936.0936.0
936.
0
93
7
.
0
937.0
937.
0 937.0937.0937.0
937.0
935
934933936937940939938 TRASH
dwgmodels.com
dwgmodels.com
dwgmodels.com
933
932
932
931
930
929
928
EX STMH
RIM = 923.9
INV (NW) = 918.15
INV (SE) = 917.23
CB
RIM = 934.4
INV = 930.9
GRAVEL EDGEP.I.VEGETATED SWALE WITH UNDERDRAIN TYP.
NOT TO SCALE
OUTLET STANDPIPE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
STANDPIPE
DIA. = DIAMETER OF PIPE
(RIGID PIPE)
SLOTTED GRATE RIM = 932.95
1" - 2" DIA. ROCK
CONE EQUAL TO 12 THE
HEIGHT OF THE STANDPIPE
EXH AWETLAND BUFFERAREAROW EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
WET WET WETLAND DELINEATION LIMIT
WETLAND BUFFER LIMIT DATE: 03.18.2022CHECKED BY: W. Stark DRAWN BY: A. AndersonPROJECT NO.: 21XXXREVISION:07851 Park Dr.Chanhassen, MN 55317Watershed Review Submittal12.15.2021Watershed Permit Submittal04.11.202212022.05.0422022.05.17Feet
1" = 30'
6030015
WETLAND BUFFER AREA
TOTAL AREA = 60600 SF
WETLAND BUFFER LIMIT SIGN
MAX 200' SPACING
Pretreatment filter strip
Stormwater Infiltration Basin
12" HDPE RISER TEE INTO EXISTING
12" RCP PIPE
RIM = 932.95
INV (NW) = 924.44
INV (SE) = 924.27
BERM TOP: 933.70
BASIN BOT: 932.0
160
161
162
163
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Authorize Execution of Two Separate Stormwater Operations and Maintenance
Agreements for the Cunningham 2nd Addition Subdivision
File No.Item No: D.8
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer
Reviewed By Charlie Howley
SUGGESTED ACTION
“The Chanhassen City Council authorizes execution of two Stormwater Maintenance Agreements
with property owners Mary and Michael Meuwissen for the purpose of perpetual obligation by the
property owners to maintain two private stormwater best management practices (BMP) systems
located on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 1 of the Cunningham 2nd Addition Plat.”
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
As part of the Cunningham 2nd Addition Subdivision two private stormwater best management
practices (BMPs) are proposed to treat and control stormwater before it is discharged downstream. Both
BMPs are small infiltration/biofiltration type basins.
Properly designed, installed, and maintained private stormwater systems have the capacity to allow for
stormwater detention and infiltration. When not properly designed, installed, and/or maintained, these
systems could fail to facilitate the required detention and infiltration of stormwater as designed. As
such, it is important to ensure that an operations and maintenance agreement is in place with the subject
164
property owner. Said agreement shall require the proper design and installation and stipulate the
frequency and type of maintenance to be performed.
DISCUSSION
The attached Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Agreements were developed by City Staff and the
City Attorney as part of the Cunningham 2nd Addition Subdivision project. Property owners Mary and
Michael Meuwissen have signed and agreed to the attached agreements.
BUDGET
N/A
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council approve the execution of the Stormwater Operations and Maintenance
Agreements for the Cunningham 2nd Addition Subdivision.
ATTACHMENTS
City Stormwater O&M Declaration Lot 1 for Cunningham 2nd Addition
City Stormwater O&M Declaration Lot 2 for Cunningham 2nd Addition
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item
Approve Consultant Agreement for Geotechnical Investigation Services for the
Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction and the Crimson Bay Road Reconstruction
Projects
File No.Galpin Boulevard Reconstruction (PW176)
Crimson Bay Road Reconstruction (23-02)Item No: D.9
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves a consultant contract with Braun Intertec for geotechnical
exploration and engineering services in the amount of $54,070."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
This consultant agreement is for geotechnical investigation services for the final design of the Galpin
Boulevard reconstruction project and for the preliminary investigation in preparation for the design of
the Crimson Bay Road reconstruction project.
BACKGROUND
On February 28, 2022, the City Council approved a consultant agreement with WSB & Associates for
the final design work associated with the Galpin Boulevard reconstruction project.
DISCUSSION
190
Additional geotechnical investigation services in preparation for the design phases for the Galpin
Boulevard reconstruction services are needed. Preliminary work was completed by Braun Intertec in
conjunction with the feasibility study work completed in 2018. Engineering worked with WSB &
Associates to identify the additional investigation work needed for the final design phases of the Galpin
project. Engineering then worked with Braun Intertec to scope the additional services needed.
The investigation work needed for the Crimson Bay Road project is minor in scale in comparison to the
work associated with the Galpin Boulevard project. It was determined to combine the work for the two
projects into a single project to receive better pricing.
Braun Intertec's contract is an hourly, not-to-exceed fee based on completing a specified number of
borings, pavement corings, and laboratory testing. A City standard Professional Services Agreement
will be utilized for the contract.
As with all engineering contracts, Braun Intertec will submit periodic invoices that staff will review
before processing. Staff will review the invoices for accuracy and conformance with the contract.
BUDGET
This work will be funded with the budgets associated with the Galpin Boulevard and Crimson Bay
Road projects.
RECOMMENDATION
Engineering recommends the City Council approve the consultant agreement with Braun Intertec for
geotechnical investigation services in the amount of $54,070.
ATTACHMENTS
Braun Intertec Proposal
191
AA/EOE
Braun Intertec Corporation
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952.995.2020
Web: braunintertec.com
June 6, 2022 Revised Proposal QTB156736
George Bender, PE
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re: Revised Proposal for a Geotechnical Evaluation
City of Chanhassen Projects
Galpin Boulevard (CASH 117) Improvements – Final Design
City Project No. PW176B
Trunk Highway 5 and the Northern Boundary of the City of Chanhassen and
Crimson Bay Road Improvements
Chanhassen, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Bender:
Braun Intertec Corporation respectfully submits this revised proposal to complete a geotechnical
evaluation for two City of Chanhassen projects, the Final Design of the Galpin Boulevard
(formerly CSAH 117) Improvements project and the Crimson Bay Road Improvements project.
Project Information
Based on the RFP and the information provided by WSB for the Galpin Boulevard Improvements project,
the major roadway improvements will include the following:
Reconstruction of a two-mile segment of Galpin Boulevard to an urban section roadway to
State-Aid and City standards.
Full size roundabout at the West 78th Street intersection.
Mini roundabouts at the Brinker Street and Lake Lucy intersections.
10-foot wide trail along both sides of the roadway between TH 5 and Lake Lucy Road, and a
10-foot wide trail along the east side of the roadway north of Lake Lucy Road.
According to the available information, 11 retaining walls are planned along the proposed
roadway to retain and facilitate the proposed trail embankments.
Various utility improvements and relocations will be required. The specific design information for
the utility improvements or relocations were unknown at the time of our proposal.
The City of Chanhassen (City) is considering various locations along the alignment for stormwater
management.
192
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 2
Based on the information provided by the City of Chanhassen for the Crimson Bay Road Improvements
project, Crimson Bay Road will be reconstructed. At the time of this proposal, a site map or further
description of the project was not provided. We have assumed general road reconstruction, including
some utility work, but no embankment, retaining wall, or other structure work on the project.
Galpin Boulevard Previous Experience and Geotechnical Information
As part of preliminary design, Braun Intertec performed a preliminary evaluation along Galpin Boulevard
in 2018. We performed seven soil borings along the existing roadway to depths of approximately 10 to
15 feet below the existing ground surface. Additionally, we completed two nearby projects in 2018,
one near an existing pond east of Paisley Path and one near Wynson Lane. In general, our existing
borings encountered clayey and sandy fill soils underlain by clayey glacial till soils.
It is our understanding WSB completed an evaluation along a portion of Galpin Boulevard in 2016 for a
proposed water treatment plant and watermain construction. The WSB borings generally extended along
Galpin Boulevard between Pearl Drive and Whitetail Ridge Court. The borings ranged in depth from 16 to
31 feet below the existing ground surface.
We will review and reference the relevant soil information in our final evaluation.
Purpose
The purpose of our geotechnical evaluations will be to further characterize subsurface geologic
conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, and provide
geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of roadway improvements.
Task 1 – Galpin Boulevard Scope of Services
We propose the following tasks to help achieve the stated purpose. If we encounter unfavorable or
unforeseen conditions during the completion of our tasks that lead us to recommend an expanded scope
of services, we will contact you to discuss the conditions before resuming our services.
Site Access
Based on aerial photographs, it appears that the site is accessible to a truck-mounted drill rig for roadway
and retaining wall soil borings and an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) drill rig for stormwater improvement
locations. We assume there will be no cause for delays in accessing the exploration locations. We are not
including tree clearing, debris or obstruction removal, grading of navigable paths, or snow plowing.
Boring access outside of the public right-of-way will be provided by the City.
Depending on access requirements, ground conditions, or potential utility conflicts, our field crew may
alter the exploration locations from those proposed to facilitate accessibility.
Our drilling activities may also impact the vegetation and may rut the surface to access boring locations.
Restoration of vegetation and turf is not part of our scope of services.
193
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 3
Staking
We will stake prospective subsurface exploration locations, as selected by WSB and Braun Intertec, and
obtain surface elevations at those locations using GPS technology. For purposes of linking the GPS data to
an appropriate reference, we request that you provide CAD files indicating location/elevation references
appropriate for this project.
Utility Clearance
Prior to drilling or excavating, we will contact Gopher State One Call and arrange for notification of the
appropriate utility vendors to mark and clear the exploration locations of public underground utilities.
Permits
It is our understanding that a right-of-way permit is not required with City prior to beginning our
fieldwork. However, Carver County has requested a right-of-way permit completed prior to beginning our
fieldwork to notify County staff of work plans. it is our understanding the County will waive the
associated permit fees as we will be completing the work for them and the City.
Based on our conversations, work between 7:00 am and 6:00 pm will be allowed on weekdays to
complete our field exploration.
Traffic Control
Based on aerial images from Google Earth we anticipate performing the borings within the existing drive
lane, turn lanes, and roadway shoulders. We also anticipate the exploration locations will require
temporary partial closures along the road alignment to alert motorists to our work area. The temporary
closures will be moved along the alignment to cover the soil boring locations and safely protect our drill
rig and crew. We are including fees for a subcontractor to provide signage for closure of lane or shoulder
for a period of five days for our truck drill rig and also our pavement coring activities.
Pavement Coring
We propose to perform seven cores (five in the travel lanes and two in the shoulder) to help characterize
the in-place pavement section. Based on discussions with the City, it appears the numerous overlays of
the roadway have taken place and the pavement cores will assist in determining in-place pavement
thicknesses.
Penetration Test Borings
We propose to drill 19 standard penetration test (SPT) borings for the project to depths ranging from
14 1/2 (roadway, utilities) to 24 1/2 feet (retaining walls, culverts, ponds). We will perform standard
penetration tests at 2 1/2-foot vertical intervals to a depth of about 15 feet, and at 5-foot intervals at
greater depths. Table 1 provides a summary of the proposed boring locations.
194
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 4
Table 1. Proposed Soil Boring Locations
Boring Number
Proposed Depth
(feet) Feature to Evaluate
B-1 14 1/2 Roadway, Trail
B-2 14 1/2 Roadway, Trail
B-3 14 1/2 Roadway, Trail
B-4 14 1/2 Roadway, Trail
B-5 24 1/2 Stormwater Pond
B-6 24 1/2 Culvert
B-7 14 1/2 Roadway, Trail
B-8 14 1/2 Roadway, Trail
B-9 14 1/2 Roadway, Trail
B-10 20 Roadway, Trail
B-11 24 1/2 Stormwater Pond
B-12 20 Roadway, Trail
B-13 20 Roadway, Trail
B-14 24 1/2 Retaining Wall
B-15 24 1/2 Retaining Wall
B-16 24 1/2 Retaining Wall
B-17 24 1/2 Roadway, Trail
B-18 24 1/2 Retaining Wall
B-19 24 1/2 Retaining Wall
195
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 5
Figure 1 shows an illustration of our proposed boring locations. The proposed locations are shown in red.
The existing Braun Intertec and WSB borings discussed above are shown in blue and black, respectively.
We anticipate the exact locations will vary slightly from this map to line up with the planned walls, trail,
existing roadway, and other site features.
Figure 1. Proposed Boring Locations
Figure provided by WSB dated March 23, 2022.
If we identify a need for deeper (or additional) borings, we will contact you prior to increasing our total
estimated drilled footage and submit a Change Order summarizing the anticipated additional effort and
the associated cost, for your review and authorization.
Groundwater Measurements
If the borings encounter groundwater during or immediately after drilling of each boring, we will record
the observed depth on the boring logs.
MDH Sealing Record
We are planning the deepest borings to be at least 15 feet and less than 25 feet. Therefore, the Minnesota
Statutes require us to complete a Sealing Record after the completion of the borings. Our proposal includes
the fees associated with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Sealing Record.
In the event we extend our borings to a depth of greater than 25 feet, the MDH requires us to complete and
submit a Sealing Notification Form for the project. The submission of the Sealing Notification Form will
require a signature from the property owner (or agent). If the form is required, we will contact you to
discuss the additional fees and requirements.
196
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 6
Borehole Abandonment
We will backfill our exploration locations immediately after completing the drilling at each location.
Minnesota Statutes require sealing temporary borings that are 15 feet deep or deeper. Based on our
proposed subsurface characterization depths, we will seal approximately 285 linear feet of borehole with
grout. Our lump sum fee includes those fees associated with the sealing.
Upon backfilling or sealing exploration locations, we will fill holes in pavements with a temporary
bituminous cold patch material.
Sealing boreholes with grout will prevent us from disposing of auger boring cuttings in the completed
boreholes. Unless you direct us otherwise, we intend to thin-spread the cuttings around the boreholes.
Over time, subsidence of borehole backfill may occur, requiring releveling of surface grades or replacing
bituminous or concrete patches. We are not assuming responsibility for re-leveling or re-patching after
we complete our fieldwork.
Sample Review and Laboratory Testing
We will return recovered samples to our laboratory, where a geotechnical engineer will visually classify
and log them. To help classify the materials encountered and estimate the engineering properties
necessary to our analyses, we anticipate performing moisture content tests, organic content tests,
mechanical analyses (through a #200 sieve only), full sieve analyses, Atterberg limits tests, and electrical
resistivity of soils.
We will determine the actual laboratory testing for the project depending on the encountered
subsurface conditions. If we identify a laboratory testing program that exceeds the budget included in
this proposal but provides additional value to the project, we will request authorization for the additional
fees through a Change Order.
Engineering Analyses
We will use data obtained from the subsurface exploration and laboratory tests to evaluate the
subsurface profile and groundwater conditions, and to perform engineering analyses related to retaining
wall, embankment and pavement design and performance.
Report
We will prepare a report including:
A CAD sketch showing the exploration locations.
Logs of the soil borings describing the materials encountered and presenting the results of
our groundwater measurements and laboratory tests.
A summary of the subsurface profile and groundwater conditions.
Discussion identifying the subsurface conditions that will impact design and construction.
Discussion regarding the reuse of on-site materials during construction.
197
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 7
Recommendations for preparing structure and pavement subgrades, and the selection,
placement, and compaction of fill.
Recommendations for the design and construction of roadways (including roundabouts),
embankments, retaining walls, trails, pavements (including an assumed R-value), and
stormwater improvements.
We will only submit an electronic copy of our report to you unless you request otherwise. At your
request, we can also send the report to additional project team members.
Task 2 – Crimson Bay Road Scope of Services
We propose the following tasks to help achieve the stated purpose. If we encounter unfavorable or
unforeseen conditions during the completion of our tasks that lead us to recommend an expanded scope
of services, we will contact you to discuss the conditions before resuming our services.
Site Access
Based on aerial photographs, it appears that the site is accessible to a truck-mounted drill rig for roadway
soil borings. We assume there will be no cause for delays in accessing the exploration locations. We are not
including tree clearing, debris or obstruction removal, grading of navigable paths, or snow plowing.
Boring access outside of the public right-of-way will be provided by the City.
Depending on access requirements, ground conditions, or potential utility conflicts, our field crew may
alter the exploration locations from those proposed to facilitate accessibility.
Our drilling activities may also impact the vegetation and may rut the surface to access boring locations.
Restoration of vegetation and turf is not part of our scope of services.
Staking
We will stake prospective subsurface exploration locations, as selected by the City and Braun Intertec,
and obtain surface elevations at those locations using GPS technology. For purposes of linking the GPS
data to an appropriate reference, we request that you provide CAD files indicating location/elevation
references appropriate for this project.
Utility Clearance
Prior to drilling or excavating, we will contact Gopher State One Call and arrange for notification of the
appropriate utility vendors to mark and clear the exploration locations of public underground utilities.
Permits
Based on our conversations, it is our understanding that City permits will not be required to complete
our field exploration. We will notify the City of our planned drilling dates prior to starting our field
exploration.
198
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 8
Traffic Control
Based on aerial images from Google Earth we anticipate the exploration locations will require partial
closures along the road alignment to alert motorists to our work area. We are including fees for warning
signage for closure of lane or shoulder for a period of one day for our truck drill rig and our pavement
coring activities. We assume that full lane closures and traffic control will not be required on Crimson Bay
Road. If traffic control is required, we will request authorization for the additional fees through a Change
Order.
Pavement Coring
As requested, we will perform three pavement cores in the travel lanes at locations selected by the City
to help characterize the in-place pavement section. We have assumed one day of pavement coring
services to be completed in conjunction with our soil borings. Figure 2 shows an illustration of our
proposed pavement coring locations.
Figure 2. Proposed Pavement Locations – Crimson Bay Road
Figure provided by Bolton & Menk, Inc. dated April 6, 2022.
Penetration Test Borings
As requested, we will drill five standard penetration test (SPT) borings for the project to nominal depths
of 14 1/2 to 24 1/2feet. We will perform standard penetration tests at 2 1/2-foot vertical intervals to the
depth of about 15 feet, and at 5-foot intervals at greater depths. Figure 3 shows an illustration of our
proposed boring locations.
199
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 9
If we identify a need for deeper (or additional) borings, we will contact you prior to increasing our total
estimated drilled footage and submit a Change Order summarizing the anticipated additional effort and
the associated cost, for your review and authorization.
Figure 3. Proposed Boring Locations – Crimson Bay Road
Figure provided by Bolton & Menk, Inc. dated March 4, 2022.
Groundwater Measurements
If the borings encounter groundwater during or immediately after drilling of each boring, we will record
the observed depth on the boring logs.
MDH Sealing Record
We are planning the deepest borings to be at least 15 feet and less than 25 feet. Therefore, the Minnesota
Statutes require us to complete a Sealing Record after our completion of the borings. Our proposal includes
the fees for the MDH Sealing Record.
200
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 10
In the event we extend our borings to a depth of 25 feet or greater, the MDH requires us to complete and
submit a Sealing Notification Form for the project. The submission of the Sealing Notification Form will
require a signature from the property owner (or agent). If we extend our borings to a depth of 25 feet or
greater, we will forward on to you a copy of the form for signature and increase our total fees by $100.
Borehole Abandonment
We will backfill our exploration locations immediately after completing the drilling at each location.
Minnesota Statutes require sealing temporary borings that are 15 feet deep or deeper. Based on our
proposed subsurface characterization depths, we will seal about 50 linear feet of borehole with grout.
Our lump sum fee includes those fees associated with the sealing.
Upon backfilling exploration locations, we will fill holes in pavements with a temporary bituminous cold
patch material.
Sealing boreholes with grout will prevent us from disposing of auger boring cuttings in the completed
boreholes. Unless you direct us otherwise, we intend to thin-spread the cuttings around the boreholes.
Over time, subsidence of borehole backfill may occur, requiring releveling of surface grades or replacing
bituminous or concrete patches. We are not assuming responsibility for re-leveling or re-patching after
we complete our fieldwork.
Sample Review and Laboratory Testing
We will return recovered samples to our laboratory, where a geotechnical engineer will visually classify
and log them. To help classify the materials encountered and estimate the engineering properties
necessary to our analyses, we anticipate performing moisture content tests, organic content tests,
mechanical analyses (through a #200 sieve only), full sieve analyses, and Atterberg limits tests.
We will determine the actual laboratory testing for the project depending on the encountered
subsurface conditions. If we identify a laboratory testing program that exceeds the budget included in
this proposal but provides additional value to the project, we will request authorization for the additional
fees through a Change Order.
Engineering Analyses
We will use data obtained from the subsurface exploration and laboratory tests to evaluate the
subsurface profile and groundwater conditions, and to perform engineering analyses related pavement
design and performance.
Report
We will prepare a report including:
A sketch showing the exploration locations.
Logs of the soil borings describing the materials encountered and presenting the results of
our groundwater measurements and laboratory tests.
201
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 11
A summary of the subsurface profile and groundwater conditions.
Discussion identifying the subsurface conditions that will impact design and construction.
Discussion regarding the reuse of on-site materials during construction.
Recommendations for preparing structure and pavement subgrades, and the selection,
placement, and compaction of fill.
Recommendations for the design and construction of roadways, pavements (including an
assumed R-value), and utilities.
We will only submit an electronic copy of our report to you unless you request otherwise. At your
request, we can also send the report to additional project team members.
Schedule
We anticipate performing our work according to the following schedule:
Drill rig mobilization – within about six to eight weeks following receipt of written
authorization.
Galpin Boulevard field exploration – five days on site to complete the work.
Crimson Bay Road field exploration – one day on site to complete the work.
Classification and laboratory testing – within one to two weeks after completion of field
exploration.
Preliminary results – within two weeks after completion of field exploration.
Draft report submittal – within about three to four weeks after completion of field
exploration.
Final report submittal – within five days of receiving comments on the draft report.
If we cannot complete our proposed scope of services according to this schedule due to circumstances
beyond our control, we may need to revise this proposal prior to completing the remaining tasks.
202
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 12
Galpin Boulevard Improvements Projects Fees
We will furnish the base services described in this proposal for a lump sum fee of $43,965, which includes
up to one hour of post deliverable consulting time. Table 2 provides a breakdown of the proposed fees.
Table 2. Galpin Boulevard Improvements Proposed Fee Breakdown
Service Fee
Staking and utility clearance (assumes no ROW permit fee) $2,710
Subcontractor – traffic control ($2,250/day for 5 days) 11,250
Drilling and pavement coring 18,745
Laboratory testing 2,920
Coordination, engineering analysis, and report $8,340
Total $43,965
Crimson Bay Road Improvements Projects Fees
We will furnish the base services described in this proposal for a lump sum fee of $10,105, which includes
up to one hour of post deliverable consulting time. Table 3 provides a breakdown of the proposed fees
for the proposed Crimson Bay Road Improvements project.
Table 3. Crimson Bay Road Improvements Proposed Fee Breakdown
Service Fee
Staking and utility clearance (assumes no ROW permit fee) $955
Drilling and pavement coring 5,210
Laboratory testing 975
Coordination, engineering analysis, and report $2,965
Total $10,105
Our work may extend over several invoicing periods. As such, we will submit partial progress invoices for
work we perform during each invoicing period.
Additional Services
Our fees do not include potential costs due to the need for snow plowing, towing, stand-by time or work
that is not included in the above Scope of Services. We will charge costs for snow plowing or towing (if
necessary) at a rate of 1.15 times the actual cost. For stand-by time (defined as time spent by our field
crew due to circumstances that are beyond the control of our field crew or its equipment, or beyond the
scope of services indicated above), we will charge a rate of $300 per hour.
203
City of Chanhassen
Revised Proposal QTB156736
June 6, 2022
Page 13
General Remarks
We will be happy to meet with you to discuss our proposed scope of services further and clarify the
various scope components. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you.
We based the proposed fee on the scope of services described and the assumptions that you will
authorize our services within 30 days and that others will not delay us beyond our proposed schedule.
It is our understanding that the City of Chanhassen’s Professional Service Agreement with terms and
conditions will be used for contracting this project. Terms and conditions will be approved by both
parties prior to commencement of services.
To have questions answered or schedule a time to meet and discuss our approach to this project further,
please contact Chad Lukkarila at 952.995.2322 (clukkarila@braunintertec.com).
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
Chad R. Lukkarila, PE
Technical Leader, Senior Engineer
Joshua L. Kirk, PE
Account Leader, Senior Engineer
204
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Resolution 2022-XX: Accept Public Streets and Utilities Improvements in
Foxwood, City Project No. 2016-07
File No.Eng 16-07 Item No: D.10
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer
Reviewed By Charlie Howley
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council Adopts a Resolution Accepting the Public Streets and Utility
Improvements in the Foxwood Development for Perpetual Maintenance and Ownership."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
Staff has received a letter from Mark Rausch, P.E., the Engineer of Record for the project known as
Foxwood, requesting the City consider acceptance of the public street and utility improvements in the
above-referenced project. According to Mr. Rausch, the public street and utility improvements have
been completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications. City staff performed a
walk-through inspection of the project and found the streets and utilities are in satisfactory condition.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
205
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the public streets and utility
improvements in Foxwood, City Project No. 16-07, for perpetual maintenance and ownership.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Foxwood Area
Foxwood Engineer Certification
206
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: August 8,2022 RESOLUTION NO:2022-XX
MOTION BY: _______SECONDED BY: ________
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC STREETS AND UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS IN FOXWOOD, CITY
PROJECT NO. 2016-07
WHEREAS, the City has received a letter from Mark Rausch, P.E., the Engineer of Record
for Foxwood, CityProject No. 2016-07, indicating the public streets and utility improvements have
been completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, City staff has performed a walk-through inspection and finds the
improvements acceptable for perpetual maintenance and ownership.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe Chanhassen City Council:
1. The publicstreets and utilityimprovements in Foxwood, City Project No. 16-07, are
accepted for perpetual maintenance and ownership subject to the conditions provided in this
resolution.
2. The acceptance is conditioned upon the developer providing a 1-year warranty bond for
all public streets and utility improvements.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 8
th day of August, 2022.
ATTEST:
Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
207
Foxw ood D evel opme nt
July 27, 2022
1 in = 500 ft
±
Ma p P owered By Da taL ink208
March 31, 2022
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re: FOXWOOD Infrastructure Installation
To whom it may concern,
As requested, Alliant Engineering, Inc. has reviewed the FOXWOOD utility record/as-built drawings and
compared to the civil engineering design plans produced by Alliant Engineering and have found the measured
street and utility as-built information to be consistent and within design specification tolerance. Alliant does
understand that the City of Chanhassen did hire an outside consultant, Kimley Horn, to provide construction
inspection on behalf of the City of Chanhassen, for the project’s street and utility installations. The City’s hired
inspector has deemed the street and utility installation work they witnessed to have been consistent with the
design plans and specifications. Gonyea Homes did also provide occasional observation of utility installations
and witnessed work being completed per design plans and specifications as well.
Based on the information available from as-built records and with knowledge that construction inspection and
observation did occur, Alliant Engineering, Inc. does certify that the FOXWOOD infrastructure was installed in
accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
Please contact me at 612-75-3080 should you require any additional information or have any questions.
Sincerely,
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Mark Rausch
License No. 43480
Principal
Cc: file
209
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Resolution No. 2022-XX: Award Contract for the Lake Susan Trail
Rehabilitation Project
File No.TIM-02 Item No: D.11
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Alison Albrecht, Public Works Support Specialist
Reviewed By Charlie Burke
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves a Not-To-Exceed Contract of $80,000 to Northwest
Asphalt, Inc. for the Lake Susan Trail Rehabilitation Project."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
The existing trail is proposed to be reclaimed and the gravel generated by the project will be reused
under the trail (i.e. full depth reclamation). A new bituminous trail section built to current city standards
will be paved to re-establish the trail surface.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
Northwest Asphalt has previously worked for the City on other bituminous surface projects. Northwest
Asphalt's previous work has been acceptable.
BUDGET
210
The Public Works Department solicited quotes for a full depth rehabilitation overlay of the Lake Susan
Trail. Three (3) quotes were returned, as summarized below. Northwest Asphalt was the low quote.
Contractor Quote
Northwest Asphalt $73,736.00
Prior Lake Blacktop $73,739.00
GMH Asphalt Corporation $80,889.45
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends awarding the contract for the Lake Susan Trail Rehabilitation Project to Northwest
Asphalt, Inc.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Contract
CIP TIM-02
211
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: August 8, 2022 RESOLUTION NO: 2022-XX
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT WITH
NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC. FOR THE LAKE SUSAN TRAIL
REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS,existing bituminous trails located at Lake Susan are in need of rehabilitation;
and
WHEREAS,the Contractor with the low quote has successfully completed other city
projects, including trail rehabilitation; and
WHEREAS,the City obtained competitive quotes for the work.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby
authorizes entering into a contract with Northwest Asphalt, Inc. for the Lake Susan Trail
Rehabilitation Project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 8
th day of August, 2022.
ATTEST:
Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
212
1
175881v1
FORM OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND CONTRACTOR
FOR
LAKE SUSAN TRAIL REHABILITATION PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 1st day of August, 2022, by and between the CITY OF
CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Owner”) and NORTHWEST ASPHALT,
INC. (“Contractor”). Owner and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth
herein, agree as follows:
1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as
the “Contract Documents”, all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract
between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein:
A. This Agreement;
B. Request for quotes, email dated July 19, 2022;
C. City of Chanhassen General Conditions of the Construction Contract;
D. Current edition of City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications & Detail
Plates.
E. Quote/Bid dated July 26, 2022.
In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which
they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A”
having the first priority and Contract Document “D” having the last priority.
2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The contractor shall provide the
goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. This contract
may be terminated by the City at any time upon discovery by the City that the Contractor or any
of its subcontractors has submitted a false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of
the minimum criteria set forth in Minn. Stat. §16C.285, Subdivision 3, the Responsible
Contractor statute.
3. CONTRACT PRICE. Owner shall pay Contractor for completion of the Work
in accordance with the Contract Documents a Not-To-Exceed amount of Eighty Thousand and
00/100 dollars ($80,000.00).
4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES.
A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment. Applications for
Payment will be processed by Engineer as provided in the General
Conditions.
213
2
175881v1
B. Progress Payments; Retainage. Owner shall make 95% progress payments
on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor’s Applications
for Payment during performance of the Work.
C. Payments to Subcontractor.
(1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §
471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor
within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from
the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor.
The Contractor must pay interest of 1 ½ percent per month or any
part of a month to the Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not
paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest
penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is
$10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor
shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor.
(2) Form IC-134 (attached) required from general contractor. Minn.
Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Chanhassen obtain a
Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before
making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be
submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of
Revenue for approval.
The form is used to receive certification from the state that the
vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit
state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid.
D. Final Payment. Upon final completion of the Work, Owner shall pay the
remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by Engineer.
5. COMPLETION DATE/LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.
A. The Work must be completed and ready for final payment in accordance
with the General Conditions by Nov 11, 2022.
6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS.
A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents
and other related data identified in the Contract Documents.
B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as
to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and
performance of the Work.
214
3
175881v1
C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local
Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of
the Work.
D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests
of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of
physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface
structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities)
which have been identified in the General Conditions and (2) reports and
drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the site.
E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility
for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations,
explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface,
subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which
may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to
any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures
of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific
means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction
expressly required by the Bidding Documents, and safety precautions and
programs incident thereto.
F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations,
explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of
the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in
accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract
Documents.
G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by
Owner and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the
Contract Documents.
H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor,
information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and
drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional
examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the
Contract Documents.
I. Contractor has given Engineer written notice of all conflicts, errors,
ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the
Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by Engineer is
acceptable to Contractor.
J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey
understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing
of the Work.
215
4
175881v1
K. Subcontracts:
(1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the
Contractor shall, upon receipt of the executed Contract Documents,
submit in writing to the Owner the names of the Subcontractors
proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except
at the request or with the consent of the Owner.
(2) The Contractor is responsible to the Owner for the acts and
omissions of the Contractor's subcontractors, and of their direct
and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is
responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's
employees.
(3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any
contractual relation between the Owner, the Engineer, and any
Subcontractor.
(4) The Contractor shall bind every Subcontractor by the terms of the
Contract Documents.
7. WORKER’S COMPENSATION. The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for
the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Employer’s
Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
8. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY. Contractor shall obtain the
following minimum insurance coverage and maintain it at all times throughout the life of the
Contract, with the City included as an additional name insured on a primary and non-
contributory basis. The Contractor shall furnish the City a certificate of insurance satisfactory to
the City evidencing the required coverage:
Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate products and
completed operations
Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Contractual Liability (identifying the contract):
Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence
Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury, with Employment Exclusion deleted:
216
5
175881v1
$2,000,000 aggregate
Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non-owned, hired):
Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 each accident
Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence
9. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as
specified within the quote shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the
City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials,
and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper
notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part
or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications.
10. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless
from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the
Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a
result of any such claims.
11. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General
Conditions.
B. Owner and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns
and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors,
assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements,
and obligations contained in the Contract Documents.
C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or
unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and
all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon
Owner and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be
reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and
enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the
intention of the stricken provisions.
D. Data Practices/Records.
(1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated
for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any
other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to
implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy.
217
6
175881v1
(2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and
practices to the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to
this Contract are subject to examination by the City.
E. Software License. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant
to this Contract contains software, including that which the manufacturer
may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the
equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The
Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one
year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for
such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing
agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition
for continuing to use the software.
F. Patented devices, materials and processes. If the Contract requires, or the
Contractor desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process
covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the
Contractor shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the
patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the
Owner. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Contractor
shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner from any and all claims for
infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device,
material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in
connection with the Project agreed to be performed under the Contract,
and shall indemnify and defend the Owner for any costs, liability,
expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement
G. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or
obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other
party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may
agree to and set forth in writing.
H. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times
waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not
constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract
by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or
obligation.
I. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the
interpretation of this Contract. In the event of litigation, the exclusive
venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver
County.
J. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Contract is found
to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining
218
7
175881v1
provisions, terms and conditions of this Contract, unless such invalid or
unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Contract
impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the
Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to
operate as the parties’ entire contract.
K. Entire Agreement. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the
parties and is a final, complete and all inclusive statement of the terms
thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s),
understandings or written or verbal representations made between the
parties with respect thereto.
L. Permits and Licenses; Rights-of-Way and Easements. The Contractor
shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees therefore,
and give all notices necessary and incidental to the construction and
completion of the Project. The City will obtain all necessary rights-of-
way and easements. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional
compensation for any construction delay resulting from the City’s not
timely obtaining rights-of-way or easements.
M. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the
action or inaction of the Owner, the Contractor shall be allowed a time
extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other
compensation.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN CONTRACTOR:
BY: BY:
Elise Ryan, Mayor Its
BY:
Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager
219
220
Capital Improvement Program
City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley
2022 2026
thru Department Streets - TIM Transp Inf Mgm
Description
Pavement repairs and rehab for the City's trail system and various City parking lots.
Project #TIM-02
Priority n/a
Justification
Budget Impact/Other
Useful LifeProject Name Trails & Parking Lots Pavement Mgmt Category Transportation Maintenance
Type Improvement
Account #2
Account #1 420-0000-4xxx
Total Project Cost:$532,000
Account #4
Account #3
Status Active
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Expenditures
380,00072,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 80,000Improvement
72,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 80,000 380,000Total
Prior
70,000
Total
Future
82,000
Total
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Funding Sources
380,00072,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 80,000Streets - TIM Funds (Transp
Infr Mgmt)
72,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 80,000 380,000Total
Prior
70,000
Total
Future
82,000
Total
221
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Ordinance XXX: Amendment Concerning Improvements and Encroachments in
Public Easements
File No.Item No: D.12
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council adopts an ordinance amending Chapter 20, Zoning, concerning
Improvements and Encroachments in Public Easements."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Operational Excellence
SUMMARY
The City Code requires an encroachment agreement to place any structure within a City-held easement.
Entering into an encroachment agreement requires the approval of the City Council, which means that
many routine permits involving fences need to wait until the next City Council meeting before they can
be issued. In some cases, encroachment agreements are necessary to protect the City’s interests;
however, there are situations where the delays associated with these agreements may outweigh their
benefit.
BACKGROUND
On July 19, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment. During
the public hearing, no member of the public spoke for or against the proposed amendment. The
Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed
amendment.
222
DISCUSSION
The City Code requires an encroachment agreement whenever a structure is placed within an easement,
regardless of if the easement contains any infrastructure or not. Due to the requirement for
encroachment agreements to be approved by the City Council before being sent to the County to be
recorded, permits requiring encroachment agreements can encounter significant delays.
In order to reduce the frequency of these delays, staff reviewed the regulations governing easements to
determine if situations exist when encroachment agreements are not necessary. Staff determined that
most peer cities do not typically require encroachment agreements for fences, and that in cases where
infrastructure is not present, fences could be placed in easements, subject to performance standards
without interfering with the intended function of the easements. Staff is also proposing restructuring the
portions of the City Code that regulate easements to improve clarity, adding a clause stating that any
improvement conducted within an easement is done at the property owner’s risk, and amending the gas
transmission pipeline easement setback to only apply to habitable structures. Staff believes that these
changes will strike an appropriate balance between ensuring that easements are able to serve their
intended function and facilitating the final review and issuance of permits.
A full discussion can be found in the attached staff report.
BUDGET
N/A
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the proposed Code
amendment.
The proposed changes and ordinance are provided as attachments.
ATTACHMENTS
Issue Paper
Proposed Changes
Ordinance
223
CITY OT CIIAI'IHASSII'I
Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow
TO
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Planning Commission
MacKerzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner
luly 19,2022
Eacroachment Agreements
DATE:
SUBJ:
PROPOSEDMOTION:
"The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the
proposed ordinance amending Chapters 20, conceming Improvements and Encroachments in
Public Easements."
The City Code requires an encroachment agreement to place any structure within a City-held
easement. Entering into an encroachment agreement requires the approval ofthe City Council,
which means that many routine permits involving fences need to wait until the next City Council
meeting before they can be issued. In some cases, encroachment agreements are necessary to protect
the City's interests; however, there are situations where the delays associated with these agreements
may outweigh their benefit.
The City Code requires an encroachment agreement whenever a structure is placed wirhin an
easement, regardless ofifthe easement contains any infrastructure or not. Due to the requirement for
encroachment agreements to be approved by the City Council before being sent to the County to be
recorded, permits requiring encroachment agreements can encounter significant delays.
In order to reduce the frequency ofthese delays, staffreviewed the regulations goveming easements
to determine if situations exist when encroachment agreements are not necessary. Staff determined
that most peer Cities do not typically require encroachment agreements for fences, and that in cases
where infrastructure is not present, fences could be placed in easements, subject to performance
standards, without interfering with the intended function of the easements. Staffis also proposing
restructuring the portions of the City Code that regulate easements to improve clarity, adding a
clause stating that any improvement conducted within an easement is done at the property owner's
risk, and amending the gas transmission pipeline easement setback to only apply to habitable
PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110
,OO I4ARKET BOULEVARD.PO BOX I47 . CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55317
Issues:
Summarv:
224
Encroachment Agreements
\rly 19,2022
Page 2
structures. Staffbelieves that these changes will strike an appropriate balance between ensuring that
easements are able to serve their intended function and facilitating the final review and issuance of
permits.
Relevant City Cqdet
Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division l, Section 20-908 "Yard Regulations": Prohibits the placement
ofany structure within easements, except for listed structures subject to an encroachment agreement
and driveways/sidewalks crossing a front yard easement for street access.
Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 5, Section 20-1019 "Location": Requires an encroachment
agreement to place a fence within a City easement.
Chapter 20, Article )O(V, Division 2, Section 20-1122 "Access and Driveways": Requires an
encroachment agreement to encroach into a side yard easement.
Chapter 20, Article XXVI, Division 1, Section 20-1265 "General Location Restrictions": Requires
an encroachment agreement to place a sign within an easement.
Analysis:
Staff was recently advised by the City Attomey that all encroachment agreements need to be
approved by the City Council before they can be recorded. While routine items ofthis nature can be
placed upon the City Council's consent agenda, a group of items that are approved en masse without
discussion, it still means that any permit requiring an encroachment agreement cannot move forward
until the next available City Council meeting. In practical terms, this adds two to three weeks to the
two to three weeks it typically takes the County to record an encroachment agreement. Since the
City's goal is to process and issue most permits within 10 business days of receipt, adding four to six
weeks for an encroachment agreement on top of stafPs Code compliance review could result in a
permit for a permitted structure located in a City easement taking as long as two months to issue.
Understandably, a two month wait period to get a permit can create a lot of frustration for residents
and conuactors.
In the interests of streamlining the permitting process, staff reviewed when the City requires
encroachment agreements. Staff determined that there are many situations where encroachment
agreements are required because they act as necessary safeguards to protect the City's interests. For
example, if a sewer line runs across the back ofa residential property, the City needs an
encroachment agreement to enswe that the property's fence is designed and located so als to prevent
damage to the sewer line and facilitate its maintenance. Additionally, the higher level on scrutiny
and control associated with an encroachment agreement is desirable whenever impervious surfaces
or substantial structures are proposed within an easement. However, the most common request for an
encroachment agreement is to place a fence near the property line on a lot with standard 5-foot side
and rear yard drainage and utility easements. These easements do not qpically contain active
infrastructure and fairly generic design standards can ensure that fences in these locations do not
interfere with the intended function of the easement.
225
Encroachment A greements
Iuly 19,2022
Page 3
Staff reviewed the ordinances regulating fences for comparable and neighboring Cities and found
that most other Cities allow the placement of fences within most easements, so long as they do not
interfere with the intended function of the easement. In some cases, written permission from the City
Engineer was required, but encroachment agreements did not appear to be required as long as the
fences did not obstruct drainage or necessary access.
In addition to reducing the number of fences that will require encroachment agteements, the
proposed Code amendment will relocate the language goveming easements from the section titled
"Yard Regulations" and to a new section titled "Improvements and Encroachment in Public
Easements". This new section will contain most of the existing language regulating easements, as
well as a new clause making it clear that all work done in an easement is at the owner's risk, i.e. the
improvements may be removed or damaged if work needs to be done within the easement. This
clause will help to protect the City and utilities should improvements, with or without permits and/or
encroachment agreements, be constructed in the City easements where work ends up needing to be
done.
The final proposed change is removing the 20-foot setback from gas transmission pipeline easements
for non-habitable strucfi.res. The City currently requires a 2O-foot setback for all buildings from any
gas transmission pipeline; however, residents have requested permission to place storage sheds and
similar items within this setback, though still outside of the easement. In all cases, the gas pipeline
company that holds the easement has indicated that they have no objection or concem with these
qpes of structures being located next to the easement.
Staffbelieves that the City's current practice ofrequiring encroachment agreements for all structues
within easements could be modified to permit the placement of fences within drainage and utility
easements that do not contain active infrastructure without an encroachment agfeement, The City
would stipulate that these fences have removable panels or gates in the easements to facilitate access,
that these fences be designed to allow water to pass undemeath, and that the fences are constructed
in the easement at the owner's risk. Encroachment agreements would still be required for fences in
easements with active infrastructure or where staffbelieves the proposed fence would alter the
intended use ofthe easement. Since fences require zoning permits, staff would have an opportunity
to review any proposed fence for compliance with these standards and potential impacts to the
easements.
The intent of the 20-foot setback was to ensure that houses were not built right up against the
easement creating a situation where residents would not have any rear yard area to place patios,
decks, fre pits, or similar amenities. Staff also wanted to ensure a higher level of protection for
homes and residents in the event ofa gas leak or explosion. Given the intent ofthis provision, staff
feels that the language should be amended to only require a setback from the easement for habitable
structures. This change will allow residents to utilize more oftheir rear yard while still addressing
the concems that created the existing setback.
226
Encroachment Agreements
Iuly 19,2022
Page 4
Staffbelieves that the proposed changes and restructuring of the City's regulations around easements
and encroachment agreements will reduce the number of encroachment agreements needed and
provide a higher level of clarity regarding what improvements are allowed in easements and under
what circumstances.
l. Leave as is.
2. Prohibit the placement of any structure within an easement.
3. Amend the Code to remove all encroachment agteements.
4. Amend the Code to rcmove the need for encroachment agreements for the most cornmon and
least impactfrrl encroachments.
Staff recommends Altemative 4. The majority of the encroachment agreements the City issues are
for fences located within drainage and utility easements where there is a low probability that the
placement of the fence will ever impact the ability of the easement to serve its intended function.
Removing the need for these encroachment agreements will reduce the costs and delays associated
with permitting, without lowering the barrier for permitting more impactful encroachments into
easements. The proposed amendment would read as follows:
Sec 20-908 Ya rd Resulations
The following requirements qualifu or supplement district regulations. Yard measurements shali be
taken from the nearest point of the wall of a building to the lot line in question, subject to the
following qualifi cations :
a) Every part of a required yard or court shall be open and unobstructed.
b) A yard, court, or other open space of one building used to comply with the provisions of this
chapter shall not again be used as a yard, court, or other open space for another building.
c) Except as provided in the business, industrial and office districts, the front yard setback
requirements shall be observed on each street side ofa comer lot; provided, however, that the
remaining two yards will meet the side yard setbacks.
d) On double frontage lots, the required front yard shall be provided on both steets. Whenever
possible, structures should face the existing street.
e) The following architectural elements ofthe principal structure ot ifthe structure is attached
to the principal structure shall not be considered to be obstructions (variances granted from a
required setback are not entitled to the following additional encroachments):
1. Into any required front yard, or required side yard adjoining a side street lot line,
comices, canopies, eaves, or other architectural features may project a distance not
exceeding two feet, six inches; fire escapes may project a distance not exceeding four
feet, six inches; an uncovered stair and necessary landings may project a distance not
to exceed six feet, provided such stair and landing shall not extend above the entrance
floor of the building; bay windows, balconies, open porches and chimneys may
Alternatives:
Recommendation:
227
Encroachment Agreements
\iy 19,2022
Page 5
project a distance not exceeding three feet; unenclosed decks and patios may project a
distance not exceeding five feet. Other canopies may be permitted by conditional use
permit.
2. The above-named features may project into any required yard adjoining an interior lot
line, subject to the limitations cited above.
3. Porches that encroach into the required front yard and which were in existence on
February 19, 1987, may be enclosed or completely rebuilt in the same location,
provided that any porch that is to be completely rebuilt must have at least a ten-foot
minimum front yard.
4. Subject to the setback requirements in section 20-904, the following are permitted in
the rear yard: enclosed or open off-street parking spaces; accessory stnrcnres, tool
rooms, and similar buildings or structures for domestic storage. Balconies,
breezeways and open porches, unenclosed decks and patios, and one-story bay
windows may project into the rear yard a distance not to exceed five feet.
5. Into any required front, rear or side yard: driveways, sidewalks, fences and retaining
walls.
6. The intent of this section is to allow homes built prior to February I 9, I 987, to add an
open porch as an architectural feature to define the entrance into a residence or update
a front elevation.
1. Homes built prior to February 19,1987, may have open porches and/or
balconies that encroach into the required front yard a distance not exceeding
ten feet, provided they maintain a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet. The
ten feet shall include the roofline, support columns and steps. This area shall
not be enclosed nor screened with mesh, glass, or other similar material.
Homes that are on the national register listing or have been considered eligible
for listing on the national register shall be excluded from this ordinance unless
approved by the national historical registrar's office.
in-a"
the frent ef the preperty are exempt frem this requirernent,
builCi+gs, Habitable structures shall maintain a minimum 20-foot setback from the any gas
transmission pipeline easement.
Section 20-923 Easements
The purpose of this section is to ensure that any improvenents property owners make within
easements are compatible with the easements' intended functions. To this end, the placement
of any structure within easements is prohibited' except as specified below:
228
Encroachment Agreements
J:uly 19,2022
Page 6
a) A driveway and/or walkway from the street to the house may be placed within a front
yard drainage and utility easement, so long as they meet all other applicable
requirements of this chapter.
b) Fences are permitted within drainage and utility easements that do not contain active
utilities and infrastructure ifthey do not alter the intended use ofthe easement. Fences
may be allowed within an easement containing active infrastructure with an
encroachment agreement if they do not alter the intended use of the easement and at
the discretion ofthe City Engineer or designee, so long as they meet all other applicable
requirements of this chapter.
c) Retaining walls, Iire pits, walkrnays, pathways, patios, signs, and other encroachments
may be allowed within an easement with an encroachment agreement if they do not
alter the intended use of the easement and at the discretion of the City Engineer or
designee, so long as they meet all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
Any work within an easement including grading, landscaping, or the construction of the
structures, with or without an encroachment agreement, is conducted at the property owner's
risk In the event thst an easement needs to be utilized for its intended purpose the City or
other entify entitled to utilize the easement may require that the property owner remove items
from or restore the easement to a state that facilitates its use for its intended purpose. Such
removal and/or restoration shall be at the property owner's expense' unless otherwise
stipulated. Additionelly, structures and landscaping present in the easement may be damaged,
destroyed, or removed by the City or other entity entitled to utilize the easement in order to
facilitate its use for its intended purpose.
Sec 20-1019 Location
Generally. All fences and retaining walls shall be located entirely upon the property ofthe
fence or retaining wall owner unless the owner of the adjoining property agees, in writing,
that said fence or retaining wall may be erected on the property line of the respective
properties. Such agreement shall be submitted at the time ofbuilding permit application.
Encroachment into a city easement must comply with Section 20-923. sha[-re${re-aa
. Fences shall not be placed
within the public right-of-way.
Wetlands. No fences shall be permiued below the ordinary high water mark of a wetland or
within the required wetland buffer area.
Buffers. No fences shall be permiued between a required landscape buffer and a collector or
arterial street.
Temporary fences. Temporary fencing, such as fencing installed to enclose a seasonal garden
or snow fencing in winter, may not be located within the front yard setback. Snow fencing
shall not be located within any drainage or utility easement.
Bluffs. No fences shall be permitted within the 30-foot bluff setback.
Shoreline Fences. No fences shall be permitted within the structure setback from the ordinary
high water mark stipulated in Section 40-481.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
0
g:\plar\city cod€\2022\2022{6 ea smondment\encroachment sgreemenls issue paper.docx
229
Sec 20-908 Yard Regulations Remove existing easement language, change from building to habitable
structures for pipeline easements.
The following requirements qualify or supplement district regulations. Yard measurements shall be taken
from the nearest point of the wall of a building to the lot line in question, subject to the following
qualifications:
a) Every part of a required yard or court shall be open and unobstructed.
b) A yard, court, or other open space of one building used to comply with the provisions of this chapter
shall not again be used as a yard, court, or other open space for another building.
c) Except as provided in the business, industrial and office districts, the front yard setback
requirements shall be observed on each street side of a corner lot; provided, however, that the
remaining two yards will meet the side yard setbacks.
d) On double frontage lots, the required front yard shall be provided on both streets. Whenever
possible, structures should face the existing street.
e) The following architectural elements of the principal structure or if the structure is attached to the
principal structure shall not be considered to be obstructions (variances granted from a required
setback are not entitled to the following additional encroachments):
1. Into any required front yard, or required side yard adjoining a side street lot line, cornices,
canopies, eaves, or other architectural features may project a distance not exceeding two
feet, six inches; fire escapes may project a distance not exceeding four feet, six inches; an
uncovered stair and necessary landings may project a distance not to exceed six feet,
provided such stair and landing shall not extend above the entrance floor of the building;
bay windows, balconies, open porches and chimneys may project a distance not exceeding
three feet; unenclosed decks and patios may project a distance not exceeding five feet.
Other canopies may be permitted by conditional use permit.
2. The above-named features may project into any required yard adjoining an interior lot line,
subject to the limitations cited above.
3. Porches that encroach into the required front yard and which were in existence on February
19, 1987, may be enclosed or completely rebuilt in the same location, provided that any
porch that is to be completely rebuilt must have at least a ten-foot minimum front yard.
4. Subject to the setback requirements in section 20-904, the following are permitted in the
rear yard: enclosed or open off-street parking spaces; accessory structures, toolrooms, and
similar buildings or structures for domestic storage. Balconies, breezeways and open
porches, unenclosed decks and patios, and one-story bay windows may project into the rear
yard a distance not to exceed five feet.
5. Into any required front, rear or side yard: driveways, sidewalks, fences and retaining walls.
6. The intent of this section is to allow homes built prior to February 19, 1987, to add an open
porch as an architectural feature to define the entrance into a residence or update a front
elevation.
1. Homes built prior to February 19, 1987, may have open porches and/or balconies
that encroach into the required front yard a distance not exceeding ten feet,
provided they maintain a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet. The ten feet shall
include the roof line, support columns and steps. This area shall not be enclosed
nor screened with mesh, glass, or other similar material. Homes that are on the
national register listing or have been considered eligible for listing on the national
register shall be excluded from this ordinance unless approved by the national
historical registrar's office.
f) The placement of any structure within easements is prohibited, except for those structures specified
herein. Fences, retaining walls, nonstructural fire pits, sidewalks, pathways, and patios not integral
to the principal structure (the first ten feet adjacent to the principal structure shall be considered
integral), and other encroachments may be allowed within an easement with an encroachment
230
agreement if they do not alter the intended use of the easement and at the discretion of the
community development director or designee. A driveway or sidewalk from the street to the house
crossing drainage and utility easements at the front of the property are exempt from this
requirement.
g) Buildings shall not encroach in to any gas transmission pipeline easement. Additionally, all
buildings. Habitable structures shall maintain a minimum 20-foot setback from the any gas
transmission pipeline easement.
Section 20-923 Improvement and Encroachments in Public Easements Proposed new section
The purpose of this section is to ensure that any improvements property owners make within
easements are compatible with the easements’ intended functions. To this end, the placement of any
structure within easements is prohibited, except as specified below:
a) A driveway and/or walkway from the street to the house may be placed within a front yard
drainage and utility easement, so long as they meet all other applicable requirements of this
chapter.
b) Fences are permitted within drainage and utility easements that do not contain active
utilities and infrastructure if they do not alter the intended use of the easement. Fences may
be allowed within an easement containing active infrastructure and utilities with an
encroachment agreement if they do not alter the intended use of the easement and at the
discretion of the City Engineer or designee, and so long as they meet all other applicable
requirements of this chapter. Fences within a drainage and utility easement must provide
removable fence panels in areas where the fence encroaches on existing utilities and/or
installation of gates having a clear span the width of the easement for City access to its
Easement Areas and the fence must allow water to pass under it so as not to impede
overland water flow during rain events.
c) Retaining walls, fire pits, walkways, pathways, patios, signs, and other encroachments may
be allowed within an easement with an encroachment agreement if they do not alter the
intended use of the easement and at the discretion of the City Engineer or designee, and so
long as they meet all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
Any work within an easement including grading, landscaping, or the construction of improvements,
with or without an encroachment agreement, is conducted at the property owner’s risk. Any
improvements or landscaping placed within a drainage and utility easement is subject to removal
by the City or utility company if required for maintenance or improvement of the drainage or
utility. In such case, costs for removal and replacement and shall be the responsibility of the
property owner. The City or utility shall not be liable for damage or destruction of the
improvements or landscaping if removed in order to facilitate the use of the easement for its
intended purpose.
Sec 20-1019 Location Reference new section.
a) Generally. All fences and retaining walls shall be located entirely upon the property of the fence or
retaining wall owner unless the owner of the adjoining property agrees, in writing, that said fence
or retaining wall may be erected on the property line of the respective properties. Such agreement
shall be submitted at the time of building permit application. Encroachment into a city easement
231
must comply with Section 20-923. shall require an encroachment agreement between the property
owner and the city. Fences shall not be placed within the public right-of-way.
b) Wetlands. No fences shall be permitted below the ordinary high water mark of a wetland or within
the required wetland buffer area.
c) Buffers. No fences shall be permitted between a required landscape buffer and a collector or arterial
street.
d) Temporary fences. Temporary fencing, such as fencing installed to enclose a seasonal garden or
snow fencing in winter, may not be located within the front yard setback. Snow fencing shall not
be located within any drainage or utility easement.
e) Bluffs. No fences shall be permitted within the 30-foot bluff setback.
f) Shoreline Fences. No fences shall be permitted within the structure setback from the ordinary high
water mark stipulated in Section 40-481.
232
Page 1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. XXX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20, ZONING, OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY
CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA
ORDIANS:
Section 1.Section 20-908(f) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows:
f) Habitable structures shall maintain a minimum 20-foot setback from any gas transmission
pipeline easement.
Section 2. The Chanhassen City Code is amended to add Section 20-923 to read as
follows:
Section 20-923 Improvements and Encroachments in Public Easements
The purpose of this section is to ensure that any improvements property owners make within
easements are compatible with the easements’ intended functions. To this end, the placement of
any structure within easements is prohibited, except as specified below:
a) A driveway and/or walkway from the street to the house may be placed within a front
yard drainage and utility easement, so long as they meet all other applicable requirements
of this chapter.
b) Fences are permitted within drainage and utility easements that do not contain active
utilities and infrastructure if they do not alter the intended use of the easement. Fences
may be allowed within an easement containing active infrastructure and utilities with an
encroachment agreement if they do not alter the intended use of the easement and at the
discretion of the City Engineer or designee, and so long as they meet all other applicable
requirements of this chapter. Fences within a drainage and utility easement must provide
removable fence panels in areas where the fence encroaches on existing utilities and/or
installation of gates having a clear span the width of the easement for City access to its
Easement Areas and the fence must allow water to pass under it so as not to impede
overland water flow during rain events.
c) Retaining walls, fire pits, walkways, pathways, patios, signs, and other encroachments
may be allowed within an easement with an encroachment agreement if they do not alter
the intended use of the easement and at the discretion of the City Engineer or designee,
and so long as they meet all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
Any work within an easement including grading, landscaping, or the construction of
improvements, with or without an encroachment agreement, is conducted at the property owner’s
risk. Any improvements or landscaping placed within a drainage and utility easement is subject
to removal by the City or utility company if required for maintenance or improvement of the
233
Page 2
drainage or utility. In such case, costs for removal and replacement shall be the responsibility of
the property owner. The City or utility shall not be liable for damage or destruction of the
improvements or landscaping if removed in order to facilitate the use of the easement for its
intended purpose.
Section 3.Section 20-1019(a) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as
follows:
a) Generally.All fences and retaining walls shall be located entirely upon the property of the
fence or retaining wall owner unless the owner of the adjoining property agrees, in writing, that
said fence or retaining wall may be erected on the property line of the respective properties. Such
agreement shall be submitted at the time of building permit application. Encroachment into a city
easement must comply with Section 20-923. Fences shall not be placed within the public right-
of-way.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and
publication.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of August, 2022 by the City Council of the City
of Chanhassen, Minnesota
Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor
(Ordinance XXX published in the Chanhassen Villager on [Insert Date])
234
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Don McDonald Citizen Action Request
File No.Item No: E.1
Agenda Section VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority Communications
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Don McDonald Citizen Action Request Form
235
236
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item 2022 Building Permit Activity
File No.Item No: J.1
Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION
Prepared By Jenny Potter, Sr. Admin Support Specialist
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
Correspondence
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
2022 Building Permit Activity - June Year-to-Date
237
2022 Building Permit Activity - July Year-to-Date
238
2022 Building
Permit Activity
June YTI)City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
952-227-1100
25l5l0Residential Single-Family
000Residential Townhomes
oo0Apartments/Senior Facilities
25l0l5Total Residential
Residential Building Permits l't Quarter 2'd Quarter 3'd Quarter 4th Quarter Total YTD
1I0New
00oRedeveloped
251510Remodeled
25l0l6Total Commercial
Commercial Building Permits l't Quarter 2nd Quarter 3"d Quarter 4th Quarter
Total
YTD
77 67Single-Family Lots
5353Residential Townhome Lots
120130Total Available Lots
Available Lot Inventory (end l,t Quarter 2nd Quarter 3'd Quarter 4th Quarter
of rter)
259868404955Single-Family
0001856t2Townhomes
0110002680Apartments/Senior
Facilities
267466625867Commercial
51282134120431134Total Number of All
Permits
202r 20222024201920182017Total Permit
H
g:\adminvorms\building permit activity 2022 yd'doc
I
I
239
2022 7113t2022BUILDING PERMIT DATA
2022 Itm JANUARY MARCH APRIL MAY
S@tion I R6idmtid I
SF DETACHED 2 2 $715,578 10 l0 t0 l 3 $t.453.827 4 $ 1.886,073 3 3 3 $ 1,1 06,0 1 5 3 3 l $1,492,411 25 25 25 $ 10,656,156
SF ATTACHED I I 0 0 0
2,FAMILY 0 0 0 $
0 0 0
I 0 0
$715,578 l0 l0 l0 $4,002,252 l 3 3 $1.4s3.827 4 4 4 $1,8E6,073 3 3 3 s I -106-015 l l l sl -492-4 I I 25 25 25 $ 10,656,156
S6tion 2 R6ldatial. Non
HOTELSiMOTELS l
I
OTHER
Subtotal $0
I
f,rim 1 Nmr6id6tial
llll 0 0 0 $
Church6 I9 I 0 0 0
Indsrial 120 0 0 0
Parkinp 321 0 0 0 $
Snie StatioD/Repair $800,000 i I I 0 $ 800,000
H6DitaYlNtitutional 123 I 0 0 0 $
324 0 0 0
Public Work I 0
126 0 0 0 $
Slord 32't 0 0 0
@----shtu6dhqftabl&.
!q
329
0 0
0
0
0 $
Subtota $65,000 l sr 15000 4 I 0 $1.304.314
I
48 111 177 $3,046,10r 139 l19 s2.733.168 $3.487.067 141 141 0 n,564.224
4 3 3 $243.900 tl I $l,080,0ss )s215.000 4 4 $2.69s.932 25 25 0 s 5,446,911
0 0 0
s6.t82.999 111 111 0 21.015.201
SdJion 5 Dcmolition
I
2 Familv
3-4 family
648
Otha 649
Subtoral
I
TOTALS
I
$35?,7E9 $400.225 I $47 1.5 l8 s368.672 $491 -410
SF A]'TACHED #DM0!/lDrv/o!#DTV/O!#Dry/o1 #DN/01 #D[vo!
2.FAMILY 1/DM0!//DM0!HDTV/OI #DM0l l,Dtv/0!
#Dw/0!#Drv/o1 /iDrv/0!HDIV/O!dDM0!{DM0l
5 OR MORE FAMILY flDrv/01 #Dw/o!#DTV/O!#Drv/o!#DM0!
$357.789 s400.225 $484.609 s4?t 518 $491.4',70
GIPLAN\CENSUS\RPT 2O22.XLS
i iruNEl
.r'T--
lsubtorah I
r Tl
l
].4 FAMILY
5 OR MORE FAMIt,Y
sublotali
Sctiop 4 Ad!i!a!s
R6idatial
Nonr6idillial
IOI,
102.
I0l
104
t05.
109
llli
214.
2)a
2l
Jo
$800.000
l
tL_
yalrlti@ P@ibl E!@lUliEl yalu4loE_ fmlElBlttsLLU!!E valuti@ Pamib lEldelUEEI yeutiq4
-r
I---r-I-t----1-
-+a
I
I
I
llll
Itr+II+
$q $0
0 r) ()1;
il{
$0 r) 0 0$
l+
_L
+
+a+l
--T
I
I+
tlf-+rl
I
I
Ill
=I
48 1
4T
-Ts2l
$o
rr-r
tl I
Schmls fL:+
-
204
2
$65.000 $237,314
$231,314
s87,000
$87.!!o
-1-2l
-+
sg 2l
]_______]____]___ f
4\1
118
645
641
$1.048,5?0 or 6r. $2,559.?16
$501.300 4. 4 $710,7e0
ol 0t olT -ol ol ol$ol ol olsol ol olsol ol ols
oI-- ol oh .
Garag6
5 or more family
subtotall-- ffi@I (r<dor?o 611 6?l - I
ffio--I-T-t ro-t-f t ro-
Avo€ll4!tlgry
s@!E@!d
SF DETACHED
-------t------t___f-'---_-__t--r-t--ltt
l
I l Ill$$a.o'tzll
240
2022 Building
Permit Activity
July YTDCity of Chrnhassen
7700 Mrrket Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
952-227-1100
29l5l4Residential Single-Family
000Residential Townhomes
0Apartments/Senior Facilities 0
29l5t.rTotal Residential
Il0New
000Redeveloped
2'7t2l5Remodeled
t2l6Total Commercial
8.17'7Single-Family l-ots
53 53Residential Tormhome Lots
t3'l130Total -{vailable Lots
Availeble Lot Inventory (end
of Querter)
ld Qurrter 2d Quarter 3d Querter 4'r Qutrter
299866401955Single-Family
000l856t2
0I l0002680Apartmentvsenior
Facilities
28716662Commercial
5l134282120431134Total n*umber of All
Permits
Total Permit
Historv
B:\adminuorhs\building p€rmit a.tivity 2022 ytd.doc
Residentiel Building Permits I'r Quarter 2d Qurrter 3d Quarter 46 Querter Total YTD
0
Commercial Building Permits l" Qurrter 2d Quarter 3d Querter 4rh Qu.rter
Total
YTD
28
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Toulhomes
5867
241
9
3 9 i
e:
e
-
.
j
=
z ?z
a
z::
E I
6iE
E
2 6
II
2i
I
::
=
a
..
I
ilill
lllIlilI
[llflil
I
I
I
I
I
TG
6
iaq
242
City Council Item
August 8, 2022
Item Mediacom Programming Changes Letter 07-19-2022
File No.Item No: J.2
Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Mediacom Letter 07-19-2022
243
244
245